SPECZASHCHITA · library for reading and printing

Materials in one place

Choose a thematic package, read the summary and print the full text on A4. The print button also lets you save the package as a PDF.

17Thematic Packages
350Material Cards
332with published text
579source files

Thematic packages are based on published journal topics and library categories. This is a navigational grouping, not a new decision approving programmes or documents. Materials available on request are represented only by cards. Different versions of a source file are listed with the relevant resource; identical texts are marked as duplicates.

Open the entire text collection Search and compare materials →

Build date: 2026-09-29 · A4 format · Russian public version of the website

Download the package catalogue as a PDF

Download all PDFs in one archive

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

FENIX: Knowledge and Energy

Eight primary FENIX files, two ZE-01 module documents and four related sources about the New Order. Working concepts by the authors, brief summaries and full published texts.

Materials: 14 · with full text: 14 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Program and architecture · Full published text

FENIX — Evolutionary System

Source status: Author's working concept 1.0; document for discussion and approval

The concept of the voluntary people’s self-development programme Knowledge and Energy: personal choice, learning, mentoring and shared practice. The document connects 13 development areas with 19 directions and describes a proposed 12-week pilot, roles, outcomes and conditions for agreement.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/library/fenix-evolution-program.html

Open on the site

PROGRAM OF PEOPLE'S SELF-DEVELOPMENT

FENIX

EVOLUTIONARY
SYSTEM

Knowledge and Energy

Personal Choice → Knowledge → Practice
Testable result →

Concept, architecture and pilot model

13

the contours of personal development

19

Practice Directions

12

The proposed pilot

Working Edition | 1.0 17 September 2026

Project parameters and roles are to be agreed upon.
It is not a statutory act or an approved state program.

01 / APPOINTMENT

Passport of the program

"FENIX - Evolutionary System" - a draft voluntary program of national self-development "Knowledge and Energy". Her subject is personal training, mentoring and joint work on the practical tasks of the family, community and territory.

A working definition: a person chooses a goal, masteres knowledge, gets access to the necessary resources, does the job, checks the result and conveys useful experience.

Parameter

Project solution

Participant

A person with his own goals and the right to choose; the family and community participate by agreement.

Programme unit

A personal route associated with a specific practical result.

Two reasons

Knowledge is understanding and skill. Energy is a personal resource, a collaborative organization, and a physical energy supply; these values do not mix.

Scale

Personal route → small group → local center → network exchange experience.

Structure

13 contours of personal development and 19 directions of practical projects.

The first pilot

12 weeks are offered, 3 local centers, 60 participants, 6 mentors and 6 projects.

Status

Concept for discussion and pilot training. Not approved state program and not confirmation of operator registration.

What should appear in the participant

Clear next step, accessible set of materials, mentor support and completed work. The program does not promise the same rate of development, employment, income, treatment or recognized qualifications for each participant.

Pilot numbers, budget, acceptance criteria and role allocation are further suggestions. Partnerships and financing are not considered confirmed until the conclusion of the relevant agreements.

02 / ARCHITECTURE

How the Evolutionary System Works

Evolution here means a managed renewal of practice through experience and feedback. This is the name of the organizational model, not a statement about biological evolution, the special nature of man or a proven change in physical states.

Layer

Purpose

Result

Person

Selects the target and allowable load.

Personal request and participation limits.

Route

It links knowledge, practice and feedback.

Plan for the next cycle.

Mentoring

It helps to analyze tasks without substituting for the choice of a participant.

Review the work and the next step.

Project

Translates learning into concrete action.

A verifiable product or service.

Resources

Provides time, space, tools, energy, and funding.

Access to resources on clear terms.

Memory

Preserves sources, methods, results, and constraints.

material that another participant can repeat.

Three pillars of the organizational model

The platform connects participants, tasks and knowledge. Funds and other legitimate sources of funding provide agreed expenses. Association of participants sets the rules of interaction and feedback. None of these elements cancels the independence of a person.

What remains unchanged

Volunteering, respect for dignity, security, freedom of belief, verification of allegations and transparency of conditions. Methods, forms of classes and the composition of projects can be changed according to the results of the pilot. The failed experiment is stored in memory as an experience, not hidden.

The educational route is not a rating of the “value” of a person. Participation is not dependent on political views, membership in organizations or donations.

03 / THE FENIX CYCLE

Five Stages of Renewal

The image FENIX is used as the program language. The names of the stages retain the symbolism, but each action has the usual practical content. They do not describe a mystical diagnosis or a mandatory sequence of experiences for all.

Stage

Practical content

What is fixed

ISKRA / Choice

Need, personal purpose and willingness to participate.

One clear result and the right to refuse.

PLAY / Practice

Training, regular action and mentor support.

Intermediate sample work and feedback.

PEPEL / Revision

Analysis of errors, preservation of useful, rejection of non-working.

List of conclusions without charges and self-punishment.

ASSEMBLY / Development

Repeat the task taking into account the conclusions and confirming the skill.

Demonstration of the result according to the agreed criteria.

POLET / Transfer

Use in a new case and voluntary assistance to others.

Repetition material; new self-selected cycle.

Rule of transition

At each stage, the participant and the mentor check three questions: whether the task is clear, whether the resources are sufficient, and whether the continuation is safe. When overloading, the route is reduced or suspended. Repeating the stage is not considered a failure of a person.

Example of one cycle

The participant chooses the task: to learn to take into account the energy consumption of the public workshop. First, it studies the units and readings of the counter, then it collects a journal. When parsing, it notices gaps and different modes of operation. Corrects the methodology, compiles a comparable report and passes the template to the next group. The proof of the result is a journal and a reproducible calculation, and not the name of the passed stage.

“PEPEPEL” is a revision of the approach, not self-deprecation. “IMPRESSION” is the learning of a skill, not the assertion of superiority over others.

04 / PERSON IN THE CENTER

13 contours of personal development

The design structure of 13 contours is preserved. This is a menu for self-choice, not a scientifically established hierarchy of people. For the first cycle, it is enough to choose one main contour and one supporting one.

Code and outline

Working content

P01 / Health

Accessibility of participation and careful regime. Personal schedule with breaks and a clear procedure for applying for specialized help.

P02 / Consciousness

Attention and conscious choice. One self-selected goal; the participant explains why he needs it.

P03 / Mind

Review and verification of sources. Fact, assumption and conclusion are separated; the source to be checked is given.

P04 / Emotions

Self-observation and communication. A way to discuss difficulties without pressure and public disclosure is agreed.

P05 / Skills

Repeated practical action. A specific task has been performed according to pre-understood criteria.

P06 / Education

Continuous learning of knowledge. A personal set of materials and the next training step have been collected.

P07 / Work and skill

Quality of work and professional growth. There is a sample of work, feedback and a list of improvements.

P08 / Economics and financial independence

Understanding resources and commitments. The training budget of the project is drawn up without promises of profitability.

P09 / Family and communities

Cooperation and mutual support. The roles and limits of participation are agreed; there is a jointly performed task.

P10 / Creativity and culture

Creation and preservation of heritage. Prepared creative or archival material indicating authorship and rights.

P11 / Nature and Service to the Earth

Surveillance and Responsible Action. There is a map of observations or an agreed environmental measure.

P12 / Spirituality

Personal values and freedom of belief. The participant determines the content himself; disclosure of beliefs is not required.

P13 / Meaning and mission of life

The relationship of intention to real action. The closest contribution is formulated; it can be changed without sanctions.

You do not need to go through all the contours, disclose personal beliefs or publish health information. The task is evaluated; the dignity of the participant is not evaluated.

05 / TRAINING CONTOUR

Knowledge: From Source to Skill

In the program, knowledge is organized not only as a collection of materials, but also as a sequence of "question - source - understanding - action - verification". The international benchmark of lifelong learning covers different ages, life situations and formal, informal and everyday forms of learning. [S01]

Element

The program's working rule

Source

The author or organization, date, reference, status and limits of applicability are indicated.

Concept

Formulated in their own words; unfamiliar terms explained.

Practice

There is a safe task and an example of its implementation.

Verification

The result criteria are announced before the start; the participant receives an explanation of the comments.

Repetition

The material allows the other person to reproduce the action.

Update

Specifies the version, responsible and the reason for the change.

Library of Knowledge

Four shelves are offered: basic literacy; skills by directions; descriptions of local projects; an archive of methods and results. For each material, the rights of use are separately noted. Open educational resources, as understood by UNESCO, allow for use and processing within an open license or public domain regime. Free reading does not in itself mean the right to copy and recycle. [S02]

Verifiability

The library suggests labeling statements as verified information, a description of practice, a hypothesis or an author's interpretation. The UNESCO Open Science Recommendation provides guidance for transparency of methods and exchange of verifiable results; a specific programme procedure is developed separately. [S03]

The number of videos viewed does not replace the demonstration of skill. The answer AI does not replace the source.

06 / RESOURCE OF ACTION

Energy: three different values

In the title "Knowledge and Energy" combines humanitarian and engineering meanings. To avoid ambiguity, the documents and indicators of the program are divided.

Area

What does it mean?

How to work

Personal resource

Affordable time, attention, willingness to get involved in the case. This is a conditional organizational designation.

Agree on the pace and load; provide breaks and the right to pause. Do not measure the “value of a person.”

Joint action

Coherence of roles, mutual assistance, tools and organizational conditions. It's a metaphor, not a physical quantity.

Take into account agreements, availability of resources and completed tasks.

Physical energy

Electrical and thermal energy, supply, conversion, accumulation, loss.

Use instruments, methods, units and approved performers.

Engineering part

Power and energy are not identical: watt characterizes power, joule - energy; in practice, electrical energy is also taken into account in kW·h. With constant power 1 KW per 1 hour corresponds 1 KW·h, or 3,6 MJ. This is a unit ratio, not a promise of device performanceS06]

For the energy project, a sequence is proposed: the boundary of the object → source accounting → Safe measure → Re-registration → analysis of the result. Approach ISO 50001 uses data, objectives, measurement and continuous improvement of energy management; addressing it does not mean certifying the programS05]

Status of technical solutions

The applicable solution is checked for purpose and tolerance. The research prototype is considered only under the approved test program. An idea without reproducible measurements remains a hypothesis and is not included in the promised power, revenue, or savings estimate.

In the first pilot, the priority is to record and secure the efficiency of existing facilities, rather than funding unproven generation.

07 / WAY OF PARTICIPANT

Personal route for 12 weeks

The route begins with the request of the person himself. The mentor helps to narrow the task down to a result that can be shown in one cycle. The proposed pilot load is up to 4 hours per week, with an individual reduction; this is a plan, not a mandatory norm.

Period

Action

Result

Weeks 1–2

Selection of the request, conditions of participation and initial task.

Personal card; demonstration of current skill without public rating.

Weeks 3–4

Development of basic materials and trial work.

The first sample; remarks of the mentor.

Weeks 5–8

Participation in the project; repetition and clarification of actions.

Intermediate result; log of difficulties.

Weeks 9–10

Completion of work and quality control.

Finished product; fixation of actual costs.

Weeks 11–12

Demonstration, feedback and the next choice.

Portfolio; decision to continue, change task or pause.

An example of the "Understandable Energy Accounting" route

The goal is to independently prepare a journal of consumption of the agreed object. Knowledge - units, reading reading testimony, a simple table, comparability of periods. Practice - obtaining permitted data without interfering with the electrical installation. The result is a journal, calculation and a list of questions to the engineer. The instructor checks the arithmetic and the boundaries of the output.

Weekly meeting

Discuss what has been done, one difficulty, the help needed and the next step. The participant discloses personal circumstances only to the extent necessary for him. Lack of progress leads to a change of route, not to public censure.

Upon completion, you can issue an internal record of participation and work performed. It shall not be declared an official qualification document without an appropriate legal basis. [S08]

08 / COMMUNITY

Local Center and Mentoring

The basic organizational unit is the local center of knowledge and practice. It can be a contractual site of a library, workshop, educational or public organization. The name of the center does not imply ownership of the building or the consent of a particular institution.

Role

The task and the limit of responsibility

Participant

Chooses a route, performs coordinated actions, has the right to refuse or change a mentor.

Mentor

Conducts analysis of work, helps with sources, sends to a profile specialist outside of his competence.

Coordinator

Keeps a schedule, access to the site and accounting of appeals; does not make decisions instead of the participant.

Project Manager

Agrees the plan, resources, performers and acceptance of the result.

Responsible for safety

Stops the unsafe stage and checks the elimination of the cause.

Reviewer

Checks the result with the criteria; if possible, it is not its sole author.

Model of the first center

We offer 20 participants, 2 mentors and 2 practical projects. Groups of 5–10 people are formed by task and accessibility. This size is the organizational assumption of the pilot, and not a proven pedagogical optimum.

Family and children

A separate safe format, interaction with legal representatives, rules of photo and video shooting and work with data are prepared for the participation of minors before the launch. Children are not included in hazardous engineering operations, financial charges or public evaluation of families. The specific mode is checked by activity. [S08, S09]

Accessibility and Disagreement

There is a paper route, telephone communication, large font, accompanying and adapting the pace. Requests for mentoring, funding and security have separate channels, clear deadlines for response and the possibility of reviewing the decision.

09 / PERSON, KNOWLEDGE AND NATURAL BASIS

19 Directions · 1–5

The numbering D01–D19 is aligned with the previously prepared “Fundamentals of Legislation by Direction” package. The following are proposed FENIX learning and practical modules, not descriptions of projects already in operation or permits already issued.

D01 / People and Health

Knowledge: Navigation by assistance, accessible environment, safe participation. Practice: Map of the availability of the local site and the route of specialized assistance.

Result: Verified list of contacts; removed barriers. Border: Do not replace diagnosis and treatment with training.

D02 / Education and knowledge

Knowledge: Search for sources, mentoring, digital and project literacy. Practice: Training workshop and open library of materials.

Result: Practical work; cards of sources and conditions of use. Border: Do not promise official qualification status without a reason.

D03 / Natural climate

Knowledge: Weather, climate risks, adaptation and observational quality. Practice: Map of heat, shading and vulnerable areas of the territory.

Result: Dated observations and agreed adaptation plan. Border: Do not attribute local stock to a proven global effect.

D04 / Land and soil

Knowledge: Land use, fertility, observation methods. Practice: Training area on a legally provided site.

Result: Passport of the site; photo fixation and comparable observations. Border: Works only with the approval and consideration of the land regime.

D05 / Water

Knowledge: Water consumption, loss, hygiene and the boundaries of household tests. Practice: Log of water accounting and checking of leaks with the owner of the object.

Result: The volume of water by the meter; the act of eliminating a confirmed leak. Border: The household test does not replace drinking water quality control.

Family, children, culture, entrepreneurship and cooperation go through all directions. For the first pilot, the available tasks are selected, and not the mandatory launch of all 19 directions.

10 / ENVIRONMENT, FOOD, ENERGY AND MATERIALS

19 Directions · 6–10

The numbering D01–D19 is aligned with the previously prepared “Fundamentals of Legislation by Direction” package. The following are proposed FENIX learning and practical modules, not descriptions of projects already in operation or permits already issued.

D06 / Air

Knowledge: Air quality, ventilation, sensor limitations. Practice: Educational observations in the room using a safe method.

Result: Journal of conditions and indications; appeal to a specialist in the problem. Border: An unverified sensor does not serve as evidence of wrongdoing.

D07 / Biocenoses

Knowledge: Local species, habitats, seasonality and conservation. Practice: A map of observations and coordinated assistance to the natural territory.

Result: Observations with place and date; check by a specialist. Border: Do not interfere with protected objects without permission.

D08 / Food

Knowledge: Food literacy, storage, traceability, loss. Practice: Educational accounting of food losses of the family or the permitted site.

Result: Journal of mass and causes of loss; plan to reduce them. Border: Do not make healing promises and do not violate food safety.

D09 / Energy

Knowledge: Electricity, Heat, Accounting, Efficiency and Safety. Practice: Energy passport of the training area with an engineer.

Result: kW·h for a comparable period; list of safe measures. Border: Installation and access to electrical installations - only with approved performers.

D10 / Materials

Knowledge: Properties, tests, repairs, ceramics and synthetic crystals. Practice: Catalogue of samples and application tasks without dangerous experiments.

Result: Passport of the material: origin, properties, restrictions. Border: Distinguish the demonstration sample from the permitted product.

Family, children, culture, entrepreneurship and cooperation go through all directions. For the first pilot, the available tasks are selected, and not the mandatory launch of all 19 directions.

11 / PRODUCTION, TERRITORY, SCIENCE AND DIGITALS

19 Directions · 11–15

The numbering D01–D19 is aligned with the previously prepared “Fundamentals of Legislation by Direction” package. The following are proposed FENIX learning and practical modules, not descriptions of projects already in operation or permits already issued.

D11 / Industry

Knowledge: Production process, quality, tools and labor protection. Practice: Workshop repair or training production project.

Result: Accepted work; list of operations and quality control. Border: Equipment and operations are consistent with preparation and tolerances.

D12 / Transport

Knowledge: Logistics, mobility and accessibility of routes. Practice: A map of safe access to a school, workshop, or place of service.

Result: Proven route and agreed improvement proposals. Border: Do not substitute for the coordination of road and transport services.

D13 / Cities and settlements

Knowledge: Environment of life, housing, common spaces and participation of residents. Practice: Passport of the yard, village or public area.

Result: Map of tasks; decision of the owner or authorized participant. Border: Take into account the rights to the object and the powers to perform work.

D14 / Science

Knowledge: Hypothesis, method, data, criticism and reproducibility. Practice: Safe research with a plan and a scientific mentor.

Result: Protocol and baseline data; separately positive and zero result. Boundary: The hypothesis is not presented as a proven fact.

D15 / Digital Environment and AI

Knowledge: Working with data, digital tools and verifying answers AI. Practice: Knowledge catalogue or simple local community service.

Result: Working prototype; tests, access rights and change log. Border: Do not upload other people’s personal data without a legal basis.

Family, children, culture, entrepreneurship and cooperation go through all directions. For the first pilot, the available tasks are selected, and not the mandatory launch of all 19 directions.

12 / ECONOMICS, SOCIAL SYSTEM AND MANAGEMENT

19 Directions · 16–19

The numbering D01–D19 is aligned with the previously prepared “Fundamentals of Legislation by Direction” package. The following are proposed FENIX learning and practical modules, not descriptions of projects already in operation or permits already issued.

D16 / Economics and Finance

Knowledge: Estimates, primary documents, contract and resource accounting. Practice: Training budget and transparent report of the joint project.

Result: Plan and fact of expenses; supporting documents. Border: Participation points are not money or a guarantee of income.

D17 / Social system

Knowledge: Family, children, accessibility, mutual assistance and employment. Practice: Club mutual assistance or support in access to services.

Result: Completed requests with the consent of participants; feedback accounting. Border: Not to promise government payments or disclose personal circumstances.

D18 / Security and Sustainability

Knowledge: Risks, safe work, actions according to approved instructions. Practice: Site risk passport and training readiness check.

Result: Control sheet; eliminated violations; responsible. Border: The dangerous stage stops until the cause is eliminated.

D19 / Development Management

Knowledge: Planning, arrangement, feedback and verification of the result. Practice: Register of community projects and open anonymous report.

Result: Decisions with responsible; versions of plans; adopted results. Border: The internal decision does not replace the powers of the authorities.

Family, children, culture, entrepreneurship and cooperation go through all directions. For the first pilot, the available tasks are selected, and not the mandatory launch of all 19 directions.

13 / ACCOUNTING RESULTS

19 related balances

Balance in this program is a management record of the need, available resources, action, and change in the state of the object. This is project analytics, not automatic recognition of an accounting asset, debt, or property right.

Balance field

What is fixed

Object and boundary

What exactly is taken into account: participant, site, task or site; period and territory.

Need

What task requires a solution and who confirmed it.

Availability and deficit

What resources are available, what is missing, on what basis.

Action

Project, responsible, plan and source of support.

Change

The initial and final state in comparable units.

Evidence

Source, log, act, calculation and author of the check.

Connections

Main direction within D01–D19 and additional links.

How to avoid double counting

Each result has one identifier. For example, the energy savings of the workshop relate to D09; the training of participants - to D02; the costs - to D16. These are different indicators of one job. It is impossible to summarize kilowatt-hours, the number of trained and rubles in one amount or re-record one savings in several projects.

Example of recording

Object: Public workshop. Basic balance: D09. Contacts: D02, D13, D16. Need: understand the consumption and modes of equipment. Action: Harmonized log and secure organizational measures. Evidence: initial data, comparison conditions, calculation, conclusion of the responsible. All numerical results appear only after measurements.

Indicators of the state of the environment, financial accounting and the rights of participants are kept separately. The connection of records does not mean their legal identity.

14 / MANAGEMENT AND INTERACTION

Platform. Funds. Merger

For management, a separate responsibility is offered: methodology and library, work with participants, resources, security and verification of the result. The three pillars — platform, funds, and association — are linked by contracts and clear regulations, not informal promises.

Element

Proposed role

Condition

FENIX

Personal route, mentors and practical communities.

Voluntary participation and clear rules.

EQUILIBRIUM

Linkages, analytical balances and data validation.

Data has source and status; analytics does not create authority.

SFERA

The environment of interaction between people and projects.

Limits of access and operator liability.

ECO-PPA

Contractual support for agreed projects.

Specific rights, volumes and obligations are confirmed by documents.

SPECZASHCHITA

Possible executor of certain practical works.

Participation - after approval; competences and tolerances are confirmed.

ORION22:22 / Heritage Preservation Archive

Preservation of materials, experience and versions.

Copyright and access restrictions are taken into account.

Programme bodies — proposal

The methodological group is responsible for the content. The coordination group - for the pilot and resources. The Board of Participants discusses accessibility and feedback. The audit team reviews the results and conflicts of interest. Their authority and formation procedure must be accepted by the operator before launch.

Division of roles

The author of the project does not confirm his own expenses and controversial results. A person with personal interest discloses it and does not make the appropriate decision. Decisions and grounds for refusal are available to the participant in the part related to it.

These links are project architecture. They do not mean that these entities have already entered into agreements, transferred assets or assumed liabilities.

15 / DATA AND MEMORY

Digital environment and artificial intelligence

A minimum digital environment is sufficient for the pilot: a route register, a knowledge library, project cards, resource accounting and a solution log. A large-scale platform is not a condition of the first useful result.

Object

Minimum data

Access

Participant

Contact for communication, selected task, agreed conditions.

The participant himself and the appointed accompanying persons.

Route

Purpose, material, work, comment of the mentor.

By agreement and work necessity.

Project

Task, Responsible, Estimate, Status and Evidence.

Team; publicly - impersonal part.

Knowledge

Author, source, version, license and restrictions.

rights of use.

Resource

Type, volume, owner, access basis and expense.

Responsible for resources and verification.

Decision

Who, when and on what basis made the decision.

By role; personal information is protected.

Role AI

Suggested functions: explanation of terms, search for the allowed library, draft plans, assistance in arithmetic and identification of blanks in the form. Conclusions are verified by the person. Admission, security, employment, medical decisions and access to funding are not transferred to AI alone. The reference point is human control and responsibility in UNESCO recommendations. [S04]

Data protection

For each operation, the operator determines the purpose, the basis, the required composition of the information, the storage period and the access range. Consent is not used as a universal substitute for all the requirements of the law. Before publication and transfer, including to a foreign service, a separate check of the conditions is carried out. [S09]

The project does not provide for covert surveillance, collection of political preferences, mandatory psychological profiles or a single social rating of participants.

16 / PILOT ECONOMY

Resources and budget example

Below is a calculated example for discussion: 60 Participants, 3 Center, 6 Mentors, 6 Projects and 12 weeks. General framework — 1 200 thousand rubles. This is not a market valuation, not an approved estimate or a promise of funding raised.

Article

Limit, ths rubles

What needs to be clarified

Coordination and methodology

252

Composition of works, contracts and schedule.

Accompaniment of mentors

288

Support format, load, taxes and payment terms.

Venues and availability

90

Reason for use and availability.

Materials for 6 projects

180

Passports of projects and a list of admissible purchases.

Digital environment and support

90

Service, data protection, maintenance.

Security and verification

150

Necessary examinations and tolerances for actual tasks.

Reserve for changes

150

Basis of use and approval body.

TOTAL

1 200

Each expense is on a confirmed basis.

Calculation for planning

1 200 000 rub. / 60 Participants = 20 000 Rs. to the planned place of the full pilot. At 48 The estimated cost of completing the route would be 25 000 rub. These values characterize the cost of the program, not the value of the person or the promised effect.

Sources and accounting

Possible sources: own funds of the operator, contractual financing, donations and grants, subject to their conditions. Specific sources are not confirmed at the time of the concept. In-kind contributions and voluntary time are recorded separately from cash receipts; they cannot be recorded as money received.

The legal regime of revenues depends on the chosen operator, its charter and type of activity. Prior to the fees, the recipient, appointment, reporting and return procedure are determined if there are grounds. The relevant law applies to NGOs, but the name “programme fund” does not in itself create a legal entity. [S10]

Participation is not accompanied by a promise of investment return. Recognition points, skills and kW·h are not declared interchangeable money.

17 / EVALUATION WITHOUT HUMAN RATING

How to check the result

The quality of the program and the work performed is checked. Before the start, the initial state, criteria and method of confirmation are specified. For the first pilot, the following guidelines are proposed, which the operator must agree with the participants and sites.

Indicator

Proposed orientation

Confirmation

Personal routes

60 agreed routes.

Cards with the selected task and conditions of participation.

End of cycle

At least 48 out of 60; 80%.

Practical work done; reasons for withdrawal are analyzed without sanctions.

Projects

6 project profiles; at least 4 results accepted against the criteria.

Act or protocol of acceptance, limitations and actual costs.

Materials for repetition

No less than 12 verified knowledge cards.

Sources, Rights of Use, Version and Checker.

Security

Zero severe incidents as a requirement; accounting for all incidents.

Log, response measures and stop decisions.

Expenditure

Documents on all actually incurred expenses.

Separate consideration of plan and fact.

Skill assessment

The initial and final work are comparable in complexity. The examiner uses the same criteria sheet. Additionally, self-assessment and feedback are collected, but they are not a substitute for monitoring the performance of the task. The completion rate should not discourage a person from making a choice.

Energy result

It is proposed to compare data only within the same boundaries of the object, taking into account the time of work, load and significant external conditions. Savings in kW·h and change of payment in rubles are shown separately. The basis of the methodology is the measurement and analysis of energy consumption, and not a comparison of two random accounts. [S05, S11]

A pilot without a comparable control group does not prove that all changes are caused by the program alone. The final report should describe the limitations and negative results.

18 / LAUNCH CONDITIONS

Russian legal part

The legal model is determined by actual actions: who provides the service, to whom, in what territory, for what means and with what data. The material below is a training checklist, not a legal opinion on a specific operator.

Area

Reference source

What to check before action

Organization

Act No 7-FZ from 12.01.1996. [S10]

Operator form, charter, representative, decision-making and financial reporting.

Education and training

Act No 273-FZ; Articles 12.2, 60, 91. [S08]

Qualification of the format, the need for a license, the program and the exact name of the issued document.

Personal data

Act No 152-FZ. [S09]

Purpose, legal basis, access, storage, publication and possible cross-border transmission.

Energy projects

Act No 261-FZ. [S11]

Accounting, actual type of work, contract and applicable requirements; separate inspection of electrical and fire safety.

Property and contracts

Verification of a specific operation.

Right to use the site, equipment, copyright, acceptance, taxes and liability.

Package before start of set

Regulations on the program; information about the operator; rules of participation and exit; description of formats; contracts with sites and performers; data documents; safety rules and appeals; assessment methodology; procedure for expenses and reporting. The list is supplemented by actual activities.

What can not be implied from the name

The word "people's" describes the intention of open participation, not the power to speak on behalf of all residents. "Academy", "center", "fund" and "evolutionary system" are not used as evidence of license, registration, accreditation or government support.

Questions about the current version of the norm, the date of its entry into force and special regimes are checked before the start of the corresponding action. All necessary tolerances are not considered to be confirmed by this concept.

19 / Knowledge exchange

International part

The international format is proposed to be built as an exchange of educational materials, community experience and reproducible methods. It does not imply a single jurisdiction, automatic recognition of qualifications or already established partnership with international organizations.

Landmark

Content of source

Application in the project

Continuing Education — UNESCO. [S01]

Learning in different ages, formats and life situations.

Accessible route, including non-digital format.

Open resources - UNESCO. [S02]

Access and re-use by appropriate rights.

License card, authorship, authorized translation.

Open Science - UNESCO. [S03]

Transparency, verifiability and results sharing.

Methods, data and limitations of safe research.

Ethics AI - UNESCO. [S04]

Human rights, responsibility and human control.

Verifying output AI; clear treatment procedure.

Energy management — ISO 50001. [S05]

Data-driven management and energy efficiency improvements.

Source accounting, objectives and measurement; no certification statement.

UN SDGs. [S07]

Including education, energy, labor, settlements, consumption, and partnerships.

Thematic comparison with goals 4, 7, 8, 11, 12 and 17.

What is agreed with a foreign partner

Status and powers of the parties; subject of cooperation; language and applicable law; rights to materials and data; financing procedures; acceptance and resolution of disputes. It is necessary to verify the national requirements of both parties and the actual operation, and not just a reference to an international document.

The listed recommendations and goals are guidelines for design. Their mention does not imply approval of FENIX by the UN, UNESCO or ISO and does not replace national requirements.

20 / 12 WEEKS

Pilot: from preparation to solution

The pilot is limited to tasks for which sites, mentors, resources and a safe way to check are available. General hypothesis: a combination of personal route, mentoring and practical project will be organizationally feasible. Performance is not considered pre-determined.

Stage

Works

Transition condition

Weeks 1–2 / Preparation

Operator and sites; rules, selection of participants, requests and initial work.

There are reasons for work, security, data and resource limits.

Weeks 3–4 / Development

Materials, first practice, approval of 6 project passports.

The tasks are feasible, the performers are prepared, the criteria are clear.

Weeks 5–10 / Practice

Execution of projects, weekly analysis, accounting for changes and costs.

Risks are controlled; deviations are reflected, not hidden.

Weeks 11–12 / Check

Demonstrations, acceptance, feedback, financial and methodical report.

A separate decision has been made: continue, change, repeat or complete.

Six demonstration projects - an example of selection

Open knowledge library; site energy passport; service availability map; repair training workshop; local nature observation; digital or paper register of joint tasks. The actual composition is selected after checking the resources and permits.

Basis for the next cycle

The transition to a new site is discussed after the closure of significant risks, explaining the actual costs and confirming the repeatability of the methodology. The report contains the reasons for not completing the routes, complaints and correction measures. The increase in the number of participants does not by itself prove quality.

The start is not a massive expansion, but a limited testable cycle. The decision on the scale is made after the results, not instead of receiving them.

21 / QUALITY CONTROL

Risks and solutions before launch

Risk

Proposed monitoring

When to stop the stage

Overload and pressure

Voluntary load, pause, change of mentor, independent appeal.

Participation has become coercive or unsafe.

Unproven promises

Marking hypotheses; checking sources and statements.

The technology is promised to be sold or implemented without confirmation.

Dangerous work

Verify performers, locations, instructions and tolerances.

There is no permit, training or protection.

Data breach

Minimizing information, access by role, checking publications.

Unauthorized access or transmission is detected.

Conflict of interest

Disclosure of interest; individual examiner.

The cost or acceptance is approved by the interested person without control.

Distortion of results

A single identifier, initial data, taking into account negative results.

The data is replaced or it is impossible to restore the calculation.

Solutions required for a working start

Approve the operator and responsible; choose three sites; agree on rules of participation; check mentors and safe tasks; approve an affordable budget; determine data protection and rights to materials; fix the criteria and procedure for acceptance.

What remains open in this edition

The legal entity of the operator, the addresses of the sites, the personal composition of the team, sources of money, specific educational formats and a list of technical works. This information is not supposed to be false: they are intended for the forms and the protocol of the decision about the pilot.

The proposed formula for the solution: “To accept the concept as the basis for pilot training. Permits for specific activities and expenses should be issued only after checking the conditions.

22 / WORKING FORMULA

Participant form and knowledge card

Forms are filled in to the extent necessary for the task. They are not intended to collect medical histories, political preferences, or a mandatory description of beliefs.

F-01 / Private route

Field

To fill

Identifier; date; contact

________________________________________

My request and immediate goal

________________________________________

Selected contours P01-P13

________________________________________

Practical result

________________________________________

Original skill; method of verification

________________________________________

Materials and mentor

________________________________________

Permissible time and load

________________________________________

Accessibility and support required

________________________________________

Next step and date of analysis

________________________________________

Pause, exit and channel of treatment

________________________________________

F-02 / Knowledge Card

Field

To fill

Title; Author; Source; Date

________________________________________

Status: information / practice / hypothesis / interpretation

________________________________________

What can be done; limitations

________________________________________

Terms of use and translation

________________________________________

Version; Verifier; Update Date

________________________________________

Publication of works and personal information is agreed separately. The signature in the training card does not replace the necessary contracts and documents for data processing. [S08, S09]

23 / SINGLE FORMULAR

Project passport: 13 sections

F-03 links learning, resources, risks and evidence. Empty sections do not mean automatic admission to work. In the digital version, each field is assigned a responsible date and history of changes.

Section

What is being filled

1. Identification

Name, code, version and date.

2. Need

Whose task is being solved; as confirmed by the request.

3. Attendance

Operator, supervisor, mentors, performers and reviewer.

4. Boundaries

Site, object, territory and period.

5. Directions

Basic D01 to D19 and related directions; selected personal contours.

6. Knowledge

Materials, sources, necessary skills and rights of use.

7. Result

What is presented; initial state and acceptance criteria.

8. Plan

Steps, terms and conditions of transition.

9. Resources

Time, place, tools, materials and physical energy.

10. Financing

Plan and fact; sources, contracts and supporting documents.

11. Law and security

Grounds of work, tolerances, risks and conditions of stop.

12. Data and evidence

What is collected, who has access, how is checked and stored.

13. Acceptance and continuation

The result of the test, limitations, conclusions and the next cycle.

F-04 / Supplement for energy task

Border of accounting: ______. Type of energy: ______. Device and source of testimony: ______. Units: ______. Baseline: ______. Working conditions: ______. Measure implemented: ______. Verification period: ______. Method of comparison: ______. Errors and limitations: ______. Verifier: ______.

Power, output, consumption and monetary effect are separate fields. Project energy passport is not issued for the document of mandatory energy survey. [S06, S11]

24 / SOURCE REGISTER

Sources: international methodological part

Date of preparation of the editorial office: 17 September 2026. The links below are used to clarify concepts and methodological guidelines. Project numbers, structure 13/19, forms and rules of the pilot - proposals of this concept, and not the requirements of the listed organizations.

S01 UNESCO, Institute for Lifelong Learning. Lifelong learning.

Learning in different ages, life situations and forms.

Open Source

S02 UNESCO. Open Educational Resources; Recommendation on Open Educational Resources, 2019.

Open access and conditions for the reuse of educational materials.

Open Source

S03 UNESCO. Open Science Recommendation, 23.11.2021.

Transparency of methods, verifiability of results, knowledge sharing.

Open Source

S04 UNESCO. Recommendation on the Ethical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, 2021.

Human control, responsibility and protection of rights.

Open Source

S05 ISO. ISO 50001 — Energy management.

Energy management: baselines, objectives, measurement and improvement.

Open Source

S06 BIPM. The International System of Units (SI).

Units of energy and power; dimensions of physical quantities.

Open Source

S07 UN. Sustainable Development Goals.

Thematic links with goals 4, 7, 8, 11, 12 and 17; not project accreditation.

Open Source

The codes [S01] -[S11] in the text lead to this register. Mentioning the source does not constitute permission to use the logo, declare a partnership or certify.

25 / APPLICATION LIMITS

Sources: Russian legal part

S08 Federal law of 29.12.2012 № 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation".

Articles 12.2, 60 and 91: education, status of documents and licensing. The text of the law in the reference legal system.

Open Source

S09 Federal law of 27.07.2006 № 152-FZ "About personal data".

Purpose, basis, scope and security of data processing. The text of the law in the reference legal system.

Open Source

S10 Federal law of 12.01.1996 № 7-FZ "About non-profit organizations".

The status, activities and management of the NGO; the choice of form is not replaced by the name of the program. The text of the law in the reference legal system.

Open Source

S11 Federal law of 23.11.2009 № 261-FZ "On Energy Saving and Improving Energy Efficiency...".

Resource accounting, energy efficiency, surveys and energy service. The text of the law in the reference legal system.

Open Source

Note on the verification of standards

For the legal part, the available texts of laws in the reference legal system are used. Before a legally significant action, it is necessary to check the applicable wording, effective dates, by-laws and regional requirements. Full legal audit of the operator, educational formats, equipment and international operations is not included in this concept.

Relationship to previous materials

The internal basis for numbering the directions is the supplied presentation “Fundamentals of Legislation for the Directions of the New Order. Russia and the International Legal Framework”, version 2.0. It is used as the D01–D19 structure, not as an independent official source of law.

Editorial status

FENIX - Evolutionary system. The program of people's self-development "Knowledge and energy". Concept 1.0 for pilot discussion and training. The operator, budget, participants and partnerships require separate coordination.

Final logic: personal choice → knowledge → supported practice → verifiable result → saved experience → next cycle.

Published files

Basics and principles · Full published text

FENIX — Foundations. Core Document

Source status: Author's working concept 1.0; document for discussion and approval

FENIX’s shared principles, terminology, participant rights and procedures for joint work. Foundations explains how free choice, culture, scientific verification and practice connect, and shows where the other documents in the series fit; it does not replace learning modules or qualification documents.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/library/fenix-foundations.html

Open on the site

PROGRAM OF PEOPLE'S SELF-DEVELOPMENT

FENIX

BASES

Core document
the Evolutionary System

Knowledge and Energy / Culture and Science

Man chooses.
Culture makes sense.
Science checks.
Practice creates.
Experience becomes knowledge.

Document

Working information

Code and edition

FEN-BAS-001 · 1.0 · 17 September 2026

Purpose

General principles, language and procedures for joint work

Relationship to the series

"Evolutionary system" · "Designer of an ideal standard" · "Culture and science"

Working concept for discussion and harmonization. It is not a normative act approved by the state program or a certificate of qualification.

PASSPORT DOCUMENT

How to use the "Basics"

The Basics set the general meaning and rules FENIX. They do not replace the training modules and instructions: the participant chooses the direction, the mentor helps to organize the work, and specific requirements are fixed in the project passport.

What is fixed here

Where it is detailed

Principles and rights of the participant

"Fundamentals" - this document

Program device and route

"FENIX - The Evolutionary System"

Requirements, Verification and Versions

"Designer of the ideal standard"

Cultural and research practice

"The basics of self-development. Culture and Science »

Sectoral legal issues

"Fundamentals of legislation in the directions"

Document navigation

01 Meaning FENIX · 3

02 The Twelve Basic Principles · 4–5

03 Man and 13 Outlines of Development · 6–7

04 Culture and science · 8

05 Knowledge and Energy · 9

06 Five Stages of Development · 10

07 Collaboration and responsibility · 11

08 19 Practice Directions · 12–13

09 Result Constructor: 13 Fields and 20 Checks · 14–15

10 Balance Sheets, Archive and EQUILIBRIUM · 16

11 Russian and international part · 17–18

12 First work cycle · 19

Applications: personal sheet — c. 20; Passport of the project - with. 21; Protocol of decision - s. 22; A case study of c. 23; Dictionary and Continuity - c. 24; Sources - with. 25–26.

Classifiers P01–P13, D01–D19, M01–M13 and Q01–Q20 saved from previous documents in the series. The new provisions of this revision are proposed for approval, and are not considered automatically accepted.

01 / SMOSL

What is FENIX

FENIX is a project of a voluntary self-development system in which a person turns his own question into knowledge, practical action and experience available for further use.

Not a single image of a person, but the possibility of your own path

The task of the system is to help a person understand what he wants to learn, what he is able to do in accessible conditions and what support he needs. The target cannot be assigned instead of the participant. It can be small: read and comprehend the text, master the tool, describe the family history, check the calculation or prepare useful work for your place of life.

In this model, self-development is not about accumulating information, attending events, or comparing yourself to others. It gets a practical expression when the participant can show the work, explain their choice and name the next step. This approach does not require the same pace and does not link human dignity with productivity.

Why is the system called evolutionary?

Here, evolutionism means a consistent renewal of modes of action: choose a task, try, see constraints, correct and pass on experience. This is a working definition of an organizational model. It does not affirm the existence of a special biological hierarchy of people or a proven change in human physical properties.

What connects a person and a common cause

The personal result remains the result of the participant. Contributions to a family, community or territory arise where other people confirm a need and voluntarily agree to work together. Scaling means moving a proven method with adaptation to new conditions, rather than mechanically increasing the number of participants.

Working formula FENIX

Personal choice → knowledge → practice with support → verifiable result → saving and transferring experience → next cycle.

The criterion of program viability is the quality of support available to a person and the work performed. The scope, fame and number of publications are taken into account separately and do not replace this criterion.

02 / PRINCIPLES · 1–6

Man, Freedom and Knowledge

The twelve principles below are proposed as the common basis of all modules FENIX. For each, the observed rule is indicated, not just the intention.

01. Human dignity

A person is not a material of the program and is not obliged to prove the right to respect for the results of training.

In the paper: The specific work on the agreed criteria is evaluated; there is no general scale of "human value".

02. Voluntary choice

The participant chooses the task, the permissible load and the depth of personal disclosure.

In the work: Rules of participation, pauses and exits are reported before the start. Refusal from public speaking does not cancel the work done.

03. Accessibility of the path

The form of work is chosen for the real possibilities of a person, and not vice versa.

In the paper: Provides for clear language, paper form, adaptation of the pace and discussion of the necessary assistance.

04. Cultural Inheritance and Dialogue

Memory, language, art, and tradition become the material of meaningful study.

Author’s interpretation is separated from documentary information; different readings are discussed without humiliation.

05. Verification of allegations

A confident statement does not replace a source, observation or calculation.

In the work: For a significant conclusion, the basis, boundaries and degree of confirmation are recorded. The unknown is directly identified.

06. Practice and skill

Knowledge is associated with an action that the participant is able to explain and repeat in the described conditions.

In the work: Instead of the report only about attendance work is saved: text, sketch, magazine, calculation, product or instruction.

02 / PRINCIPLES · 7–12

Responsibility and continuation

07. Proportionality of resources

The task must be in line with the time, support, materials and means that can actually be managed.

Plan and fact are different. An unconfirmed promise is not considered a resource.

08. Safety Before Scale

The growth of the project does not justify dangerous actions and work without the necessary grounds.

In the paper: The boundaries, responsible and stopping conditions are named in advance; an uncovered critical risk blocks the corresponding step.

09. Cooperation without attribution

The common cause is based on clear roles, consent and respect for authorship.

In the paper: The contribution of the participant is recorded; publication, use of materials and possible costs are agreed separately.

10. Responsibility for consequences

The result of one direction is considered together with the impact on others.

Cost savings are tested for impact on accessibility, safety, people’s workload, and the state of the environment.

11. Preserving experience

The result, source records and constraints form the project memory.

In the work: A card with authorship, sources, version and access mode is transferred to the Archive; the personal does not become open by default.

12. Right to review

Mistakes and changing needs require adjustments rather than protecting the old solution at all costs.

In the paper: There is a channel of comments, a history of versions and a clear procedure for changing the criteria until the next cycle.

Disagreement with the author or mentor does not in itself constitute a violation. Actions, compliance with agreements and the possibility of safe discussion are essential.

03 / PEOPLE · P01–P07

13 contours of personal development

Contours are a menu of self-choice, not the steps of “higher” and “lower” people. One main circuit and one supporting circuit are sufficient for one cycle. There is no mandatory passage of all thirteen.

Contour

Content of choice

What can be presented

P01 / Health

Available load, breaks and safe conditions of participation.

A coordinated regime and an understandable path to specialized assistance.

P02 / Consciousness

Attention to your own choices and actions.

The participant explains why he chose the task.

P03 / Mind

Question, argument, distinction of fact and assumption.

The output is related to the source; the constraints are named.

P04 / Emotions

Self-observation and respectful discussion of difficulties.

There is a way for the participant to request help.

P05 / Skills

Learn a specific repetitive action.

Work is shown according to previously known criteria.

P06 / Education

Personal route of learning.

A set of materials was collected and the next step was determined.

P07 / Work and skill

Quality of performance and feedback.

Sample work, comments and corrected version.

How to formulate a personal task

Instead of "getting better at everything" - "prepare a card of a family thing with the separation of memories from verified information." Instead of "understanding science" - "to formulate the question, record the observation and show what exactly follows from it."

Personal choice does not turn into a questionnaire of worldview

The task, conditions and necessary support are discussed. Diagnoses, beliefs and family circumstances are not collected for the sake of the completeness of the profile. The training route does not replace medical or psychological care.

03 / PEOPLE · P08–P13

Personal Meaning and Social Contribution

Contour

Content of choice

What can be presented

P08 / Economics and financial independence

Understanding time, costs and obligations.

Training estimates with a division of available and expected funds.

P09 / Family and communities

agreements and mutual support.

Joint task with voluntary roles.

P10 / Creativity and culture

Creating and preserving cultural experiences.

Text, handicraft or archive card with authorship.

P11 / Nature and Service to the Earth

Careful supervision and responsible practice.

Dated observation or concerted action.

P12 / Spirituality

Personal values and freedom of belief.

The content is chosen by the participant; disclosure is not required.

P13 / Meaning and mission of life

The relationship of intention to the next real step.

A personal answer about the benefits of the task, which can be revised.

One task - several connections

Working with family history can begin in P10 "Creativity and culture" based on P03 "Reason" and support P09 "Family and Communities". These are links of one work, not three separate achievements. They do not provide a basis for assessing all aspects of the author's life.

The Mentoring Frontier

The mentor helps to clarify the result, select materials and organize feedback. He does not assign a life mission, does not interpret experiences as a diagnosis, and does not require agreement with his own beliefs. When the task goes beyond its competence, the work is transferred to a profile specialist or is limited to a safe educational format.

Contents P12 and P13 do not become mandatory reporting. The participant has the right to work only with practical contours and not to discuss ideological issues.

04 / TWO OPERA

Culture and science

In FENIX, culture helps to raise the question of the meaning, context and form of work. The scientific approach helps to determine what is known, how it is verified and where the conclusion ends.

Cultural work

Research work

Language, memory, work, craft, tradition.

Question, source, observation, method, data.

What does this mean for the author and the community?

What statements can be verified and in what way?

Allows for different reasoned readings.

It is necessary to distinguish between the basis of the conclusion and the assumption.

Result: creative work or interpretation with context.

Outcome: protocol, data, and output within specified boundaries.

The UNESCO Framework Programme on Culture and Art Education 2024 addresses cultural learning during the life and relationship of the educational and cultural environment. In this paper, it is used as an international reference point rather than as a proof of effectiveness of FENIX. [S02]

The UNESCO Open Science Recommendation 2021 describes the availability of scientific knowledge, transparency and the possibility of its reuse, taking into account the necessary limitations. The source card offered for FENIX is its own tool for implementing this idea. [S03]

General Exercise: One Thing, Two Questions

Select the subject with the consent of the owner. The cultural question is: why is this thing important and what kind of story is connected with it? Checkable question: what can be established about the origin by inscription, photo, catalog or document? The result is a small card in which the story, confirmed summary and author's reading are not mixed.

Communication without substitution

Image and symbol can guide creativity, but do not serve as physical evidence. Measurement can specify the properties of an object, but does not in itself determine its personal or cultural value.

05 / RESOURCE OF ACTION

Knowledge and Energy

Knowledge: from material to own work

A small set of sources is selected for each task. The participant briefly retells the meaning in his own words, verifies an important statement and applies what he has learned in the work. The knowledge card indicates the author, date, origin, terms of use, verification and restrictions.

The concept of lifelong learning at the UNESCO Institute covers different ages, contexts and forms of learning. In FENIX this is used as the basis of an open route, not as a requirement to study continuously without rest. [S01]

Open educational resources are defined by UNESCO through a public domain or open license allowing appropriate uses. A free web page does not automatically allow processing and distribution. [S04]

Three Energy Values - Three Ways of Accounting

Meaning

What we fix

What we do not mix

Personal resource

Available time, attention, agreed load and pauses.

Self-esteem does not translate into electrical units.

Joint efforts

Roles, working hours, mutual aid and employment restrictions.

The same hour is not promised for two tasks.

Physical energy

Object, instrument or data source, period, readings and units.

Equipment power and actual energy consumption are different.

In the SI system, joule refers to energy and watt to power. From these units follows: at constant power 1 KW per 1 Time is spent 1 KW·h = 3,6 MJ. This is a calculation by unit definitions, not a characteristic of a particular device. [S06]

Energy practices start with permitted data and safe surveillance. Installation, repair and testing of electrical installations are not included in the general route of self-development. An untested technical idea is preserved as a hypothesis, not as a promised resource.

06 / THE FENIX CYCLE

Five Stages of Development

Stage names retain the symbolic language of the program. The transition is determined by the readiness of the work and the participant, and not by assigning a level to a person. Returns, pauses and task changes are allowed.

Stage

The main question

Action and Confirmation

Iskra

What do I choose and why?

Short request; borders; initial work; agreed immediate result.

Flame

What do you need to know and try?

Study materials, safe practice, journal questions and intermediate work.

Ashes

What has experience shown and what should be changed?

Analysis of errors, costs and limitations; preservation of useful; rejection of unconfirmed conclusions.

Ascension

What really happened?

Check by criteria; explanation of the result; corrected version and acceptance decision.

Flight

How to pass on the experience and continue?

A card in the Archive; clear instruction; new question or completion of participation.

Each transition is a short check

Suffice it to say: is the problem clear, is there enough confirmed resources and is it safe to continue? If the answer is negative, the plan is adjusted. You cannot declare the result achieved just because the deadline has expired or the next symbolic stage has come.

The standard accompanies the cycle

On the "Iskra" the desired image is recorded. Before the main work, it turns into verifiable requirements. When accepting, the actual work is compared with the agreed version of the requirements. The modified criteria shall not be applied retroactively without separate discussion.

Ashes: Analysis of experience, not depreciation

A wrong hypothesis can yield a useful result: a clear limit of applicability and a corrected way of working. To do this, it is important to keep the original records, not just the beautiful final version.

07 / JOINT WORK

Local Center and Responsibility

The local center FENIX is offered as a meeting place, knowledge and safe practice. It can work on the agreed site of a library, workshop or other organization. The name of the center does not in itself confirm the presence of premises, partnerships, financing or rights to operate.

Role

Area of responsibility

Participant

Selects the task and load; performs the work; retains the right to pause and exit.

Mentor

Helps with sources, method and feedback within the competence.

Task Owner

Confirms the need and conditions for the use of the result.

Site operator

Provides organizational grounds, safe conditions, agreements and documents.

Reviewer

Compares work with criteria; reveals personal interest.

Keeper of materials

Leads versions, access rights, origin and order of corrections.

How the decision is made

The initiator describes the issue and options. Performers confirm the load, the operator checks the grounds, the checker specifies the criteria. The decision shall be made by the authorized person within the limits of his role and shall be recorded: subject, reason, responsible, term and method of revision. The consent of the group does not replace the necessary permission or contract.

Disagreements and treatment

A separate contact is offered for the appeal, the period of initial response is up to five working days and consideration by the person whose actions are disputed. This is a project procedure; it does not reduce statutory rights and deadlines. In case of an immediate threat, security is provided immediately, without waiting for the usual consideration.

In a small group, roles can be combined, but the combination is revealed. For a controversial result, it is desirable to attract an inspector who is not its author. Waiver of participation shall not be used as a ground for public censure.

08 / ARCHITECTURE · D01–D10

19 areas of practice

Classifier D01 - D19 from the program "FENIX - Evolutionary system" is preserved. These are task areas, not people’s evaluation categories. For the project, one main code is selected; the others indicate links.

Code

Area of work

Subject of work

D01

People and health

Accessibility of participation, navigation by assistance, environmental conditions.

D02

Education and knowledge

Personal route, sources, mentoring, workshops.

D03

Natural climate

Observations and adaptation; local result without global promises.

D04

Land and soils

Authorized training area, history of use, observation.

D05

Water

Water accounting, history of reservoirs, questions to a profile specialist.

D06

Air

Observation of the conditions of the room with an indication of the method and restrictions.

D07

Biotic communities

Careful study of species and habitats without unauthorized intervention.

D08

Food

Food culture, origin of products, observation of losses.

D09

Energy

Clear accounting, resource support, safe practice.

D10

Materials

Ceramics, synthetic crystals and other materials: properties by sources.

One work can connect several directions

For example, "Light for reading" may have a basic code D09 and liaison with D02, D13, D14 and D18. Electricity consumption, reading experience and safety remain different subjects of observation. One improved corner is not recorded as five independent results.

Culture and science in this module are cross-cutting ways of working. For culture, a new twentieth direction is not created; D14 "Science" is preserved as an independent subject of research tasks.

08 / ARCHITECTURE · D11–D19

From Production to Development Management

Code

Area of work

Subject of work

D11

Industry

Manufacturing map, product history, processes and craftsmanship.

D12

Transport

Routes and availability without interference.

D13

Cities and settlement

Location, public spaces, cultural routes.

D14

Science

Question, protocol, source data, calculation and output limits.

D15

Digital environment and AI

Catalogs, access rights, digital literacy and verification AI.

D16

Economics and finance

Plan and fact of resources, costs and liabilities.

D17

Social system

Mutual assistance, intergenerational learning, accessibility.

D18

Safety and resilience

Risks, stop conditions, permissions, and response procedures.

D19

Development management

Tasks, solutions, responsibility, versions and feedback.

Scaling without losing meaning

First, the work is described in one context: for whom it is intended, what was required and what did not work. Then another group checks the applicability of the method on its site. Knowledge, pattern, and criteria are transferred, but not unconfirmed promises of the same result.

When not to include all directions

A small cultural or educational project is not required to complete nineteen separate plans. The main direction and significant connections are enough. A complete matrix is needed to review the program or territory when there is data, responsibility and decisions for each area actually affected.

Compatibility rule

The new modules use the same D-codes. Changing the name or content is made out by a version of the classifier with a correspondence table, and is not introduced imperceptibly in the next illustration or form.

09 / RESULTS CONSTRUCTOR

13 fields of a unified profile

Three levels remain separate: the ideal image is the desired benefit; the working standard is the agreed requirements; the fact is the work presented and the confirmations. The standard refers to the result, process, and conditions, not to the dignity of the human being.

Code / field

What should be clear

M01 / Identification

Name, code, version, date and status

M02 / Need

Whose task it is and how the request is substantiated

M03 / Participants

Author, mentor, operator, reviewer

M04 / Borders

Object, audience, period, exceptions

M05 / Directions

Primary D-code, connections and selected P-areas

M06 / Knowledge

Sources, skills, method and rights of use

M07 / Results

Image → working requirements → actual work

M08 / Plan

Steps, deadlines and checkpoints

M09 / Resources

Time, materials, site and energy separately

M10 / Finance

Expenditure plan, source and supporting evidence

M11 / Law and Security

Legal basis, accessibility, risks and stopping conditions

M12 / Data and evidence

Log, Files, Method, Access and Restrictions

M13 / Acceptance and continuation

Decision, comments, version and next cycle

Minimum unit of result

For a small task, one clear output is enough: a card, a sketch, a magazine or a verified calculation. To it are added the criterion, the method of verification and limitation. For example: "The reader can trace the origin of each significant statement in the card to the attached source or the mark "not established".

P01–P13 — personal contours; M01–M13 — field of passport. These are different lists. Coincidence 13 It does not make them interchangeable. The completed passport form is in Appendix B.

09 / QUALITY VERIFICATION

20 Inspections

Q01-Q20 are saved from "Designer of the ideal reference". For each item, the status, confirmation and responsible are fixed. The overall rating of people is not calculated.

Code

Group

Verification

Q01

Use

The need is confirmed by the participant or the owner of the task.

Q02

Use

A person can choose a route, pause and exit.

Q03

Use

The boundaries of the object, period, and group are clearly described.

Q04

Use

The initial state is separated from the desired result.

Q05

Use

The criteria are clear to the user and the examiner.

Q06

Feasibility

The necessary knowledge, method and mentor are available.

Q07

Feasibility

Resources are confirmed; there is no double promise of one resource.

Q08

Feasibility

Time and load agreed with the performers.

Q09

Feasibility

The financial plan has a basis and is responsible.

Q10

Feasibility

Roles, powers and dependencies are defined.

Q11

Security

Legal grounds and mandatory requirements are identified.

Q12

Security

Risks, stop conditions and response procedures have been identified.

Q13

Security

The availability and absence of coercion are taken into account.

Q14

Security

Rights to materials and data regime are established.

Q15

Security

Side effects in related directions have been tested.

Q16

Evidence

For the criterion, units, method and decision rule are specified.

Q17

Evidence

Periods and conditions are comparable or differences are explained.

Q18

Evidence

Data, calculations and restrictions are available to the verifier.

Q19

Evidence

The result is not only verified by its author.

Q20

Evidence

The version, revision period and correction channel are assigned.

Statuses: "confirmed"; "required improvement"; "Not applicable - with an explanation." Unclosed security risk, rights or data blocks related work, even when performing the remaining items. Checks are carried out before the start and upon acceptance.

10 / MEMORY AND RESOURCES

Balances, Archive and EQUILIBRIUM

Inside FENIX, a linked balance sheet is a proposed record of a need, available resource, action, and confirmed change. The record has an object, a period, a unit and a responsible one. Time, money, electricity, materials, and learning outcomes do not add up to a single value without a separately valid model.

Before the action

During work

After verification

need and initial condition.

Artist, method and primary records.

Actual results and limitations.

Availability of resources and confirmed grounds.

Actual costs and plan changes.

Balances, obligations and necessary corrections.

Basic D-code and significant connections.

Control of side effects.

Verified changes for each link.

Protection from double counting

Material, work hour or consumption gets one primary record. Links to it are used in related areas. If the total cost is to be distributed, the method of distribution is agreed in advance; resuming one record is excluded. The comparison before and after is carried out in the same units and with an explanation of the differences in conditions.

Memory with origin

The Heritage Preservation Archive stores the author, source, method, date, version, result of verification, rights, and access restrictions. EQUILIBRIUM in the architecture of this document is the intended environment for linking such records. The existence of a ready-made software implementation, integrations or legal powers is not approved by this description.

“KRISTALL741”

The information scheme proposed in the previous module is retained: three layers - image, working standard and fact — × 19 Directions × 13 Fields = 741 Position. It is a data structure for reconciliation, not a physical law and not a proof of effectiveness. Unused positions are not filled artificially.

The project balance does not replace the mandatory accounting, contracts and confirmation of rights. The contribution, the promise and the actual received resource are reflected in different statuses.

11 / RUSSIAN LEGAL

Grounds before work begins

Articles 43–44 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation establish the foundations of the right to education, support for self-education, freedom of creativity and participation in cultural life. The practical conditions of activity are determined by special norms and the actual format of the project. [S07]

Question for verification

Reference source and project document

Who organizes the work and on what basis?

Information about the operator, his powers and agreements with the site; decision on a specific format.

Is the educational program being implemented?

273-FZ "Education in the Russian Federation". Prior to launch, check the applicable mode, including licensing; the name "circle" or "workshop" does not resolve the issueS08]

What data is really needed?

152-FZ "About Personal Data". Determine the purpose, basis, composition, access, timing and order of appeals; separate verification of publication and cross-border transferS09]

Who owns the materials used?

Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation: authorship, rights and acceptable methods of use. A specific basis, not just the existence of a file, is fixed for publication. [S10]

What actions require special conditions?

Map of activities: children, equipment, medical issues, premises, land and natural objects. Applicable requirements are determined prior to admission to work.

Minimum operator package

Regulations on the module; information about the operator and the site; rules for participation and exit; distribution of roles; security and appeal procedures; documents on data and rights; acceptance criteria; estimates and contractual grounds if there are costs. Before inviting participants, you need to know who is responsible for each document.

The Limit of this Legal Part

This is a navigation for training, not a conclusion about the legality of a particular project. The source register distinguishes between the initial publication of the law and the available departmental text. Full reconciliation of all editions and regional requirements before launch is carried out separately.

11 / INTERNATIONAL PART

Cooperation through knowledge

International development FENIX in this edition is proposed as a voluntary exchange of cultural works, methods, authorized materials and mentoring experience. The status of the participants, the availability of partners and the conclusion of agreements must be confirmed separately.

Landmark

What goes into work

Lifelong Learning - UNESCO

Different life situations and forms of learning; the ability to continue the route at an affordable pace. [S01]

Culture and art education — 2024

Attention to heritage, cultural context, and the relationship between cultural and educational sites. [S02]

Open Science — 2021

Origin of knowledge, description of method and transparency with necessary access restrictions. [S03]

Open educational resources — 2019

Authorized exchange, adaptation, translation and distribution of materials within rights. [S04]

Ethics of artificial intelligence — 2021

Human responsibility, supervision, rights protection and caution when working with data. [S05]

Model of the common project of two workshops

Choose one common question; agree on terms and language; prepare cards according to one structure; exchange materials with the permitted mode of use; compare methods and explain the differences in context. The observation of one group does not extend to the whole country or culture.

Before the transfer of materials

The parties, the subject matter of the work, rights, data, costs, jurisdictions and the procedure for resolving disagreements are fixed. The availability of open access does not cancel the national requirements for the transfer of personal data and the use of works. For a real operation, the applicability of the standards is checked separately. [S09, S10]

These international recommendations and framework documents are guidelines, not certificates, licenses or information about the approval of FENIX UNESCO. The terms of a particular international treaty are established by its status, parties and subject matter; automatic applicability is not expected.

12 / START OF WORK

First cycle: from question to result

For communication with the last module "Culture and Science", an example of 12 weeks and 36 hours of total time of the participant is used. This is the proposed volume, not the mandatory norm: 36 hours for 60 minutes, including meetings, independent work, practice and verification. The number of the center and funding are determined by a separate passport.

Period / Time

What is being done

What remains as a result

Weeks 1–2 / 6 hours

Personal question, availability, task selection, initial work and criteria.

Personal sheet; draft passport; decision on a safe start.

Weeks 3–6 / 12 hours

Cultural context, sources, method, small exercises.

Knowledge cards; refined plan; intermediate work.

Weeks 7–10 / 12 hours

Practice, primary records, feedback, correction.

Work and journal; actual resources; limitations.

Weeks 11–12 / 6 hours

Checking, explaining the result, Archive and next question.

Protocol; Authorized Archival Card; Decision to Continue.

The first week is five steps.

Choose one question. Name the result. Find a reliable source. Agree on time and safe conditions. Assign a short review. You don’t need to fill out the entire matrix of the system or cover nineteen directions first.

How to Watch the Program Results

Separately, the number of start-ups, the number of completions and the reasons for stopping; the number of works with agreed criteria; actual costs; comments; cases of reuse of materials. The denominator of each indicator is disclosed. The self-report of benefit is kept separate from the observed skill.

Repetition condition

A new cycle begins when the query, responsible, resources, security, and method of verification are understood. In the absence of one of these conditions, scaling is postponed, and the task is reassembled.

ANNEX A / FORM F-BAS-01

Personal list "Fundamentals"

It is filled by the participant. Short answers enough. You can use the selected name or code; contact is only transmitted where it is really needed.

My question

What is important for me to understand or learn to do?

________________________________________________________________________

My Result

What specific work can I show you?

________________________________________________________________________

My choice

The main P-circuit; supporting contour - only if necessary.

________________________________________________________________________

My sources

Material, author, date; who will help verify understanding?

________________________________________________________________________

My Terms

Available time, place, necessary fixtures and support.

________________________________________________________________________

My Boundaries

What actions do I not perform; when I pause?

________________________________________________________________________

My test

Who and how will check the work according to the known criterion?

________________________________________________________________________

My next step

Action, convenient date and time of a short analysis.

________________________________________________________________________

Date of filling: __________________ Date of next analysis: __________________

The public presentation of the work, the processing of data and the right to publish are agreed separately. This sheet is not a universal consent to the use of personal data.

ANNEX B / FORM F-BAS-02

Short project passport

The structure M01-M13 coincides with the "Designer of the ideal reference". Fields can be filled in directly in Word. The application or registry entry is specified for details.

Field

Project recording

M01 / Identification

______________________________________________

M02 / Need

______________________________________________

M03 / Participants

______________________________________________

M04 / Borders

______________________________________________

M05 / Directions

______________________________________________

M06 / Knowledge

______________________________________________

M07 / Results

______________________________________________
Image: __________ Requirement: __________ Fact: __________

M08 / Plan

______________________________________________

M09 / Resources

______________________________________________

M10 / Finance

______________________________________________

M11 / Law and Security

______________________________________________

M12 / Data and evidence

______________________________________________

M13 / Acceptance and continuation

______________________________________________

Annexes to the passport: criteria and method of verification; Q01-Q20; risk map; sources; rights and access; if necessary - estimates. Filling out the form does not mean automatic admission to the activity.

ANNEX C / FORM F-BAS-03

Solution, acceptance and new version

The form applies to the start, acceptance or revision of one particular job. The chosen type of decision is marked with words, without a summary assessment of the person.

Field

To fill

Project, code and version

________________________________________________________

Decision type and date

Start / acceptance / revision / suspension / completion
________________________________________________________

Subject matter

What result or step is being considered?
________________________________________________________

Confirmations

Criteria, primary records, references, checker.
________________________________________________________

Limitations and risks

What is not confirmed; what is excluded; what blocks the continuation?
________________________________________________________

Decision and Responsibility

What is allowed or accepted; who is responsible for the next step?
________________________________________________________

Corrections and due date

________________________________________________________

Publication and access

What can be transferred to the Archive and on what basis?
________________________________________________________

Review and treatment

Date of review; way to report disagreement.
________________________________________________________

A short log of changes

Date / Version

What has changed and why

Who is considered

________________

____________________________________

__________________

________________

____________________________________

__________________

________________

____________________________________

__________________

The decision is kept together with the version of the criteria under which the verification was carried out. The new version does not erase the history of previous decisions.

APPENDIX G / TRAINING EXAMPLE

First work: "The story of one thing"

The example shows the application of the "Basics"; it does not describe the event held and does not contain fictional measurement results.

Request and Borders

The participant wants to keep the story about the family thing and learn to distinguish the memory from the established information. The owner allows the inspection and recording of the selected part of the story. No restoration, valuation or publication of personal data is included in the task.

Element

Proposed entry

Communication with the system

Basic D02; connections D14 and D17. Basic personal circuit P10; supporting P03 - optional.

The perfect image

The family memory is clearly and carefully preserved.

Working Standard

Card up to two pages: description, story indicating the source, verified information, unknown, rights.

Resources

One permitted thing, existing materials, time of the participant and the interlocutor. No new purchases are expected.

Criterion

Each significant statement has a source or a note about an assumption or an unknown fact.

Verification

Another participant tracks down the grounds; the owner checks the information about himself. These tests perform different tasks.

Passing the cycle

The spark is to settle the matter. The flame is to describe a thing and study the materials. Ashes are to detect gaps and not to adjust history to wait. Ascension - check the card and correct the wording. Flight - save the allowed version and select the next question.

Permissible outcome

The date of manufacture is not established, but the story is correctly recorded, the origin of the information is visible, and the rights are preserved. This may be a sufficient result of an agreed task — without a statement that an unknown date has been found.

ANNEX D / LANGUAGE AND CONTINUITY

General dictionary FENIX

Term

Importance in this series

Self-development

Independent choice of task and movement from knowledge to action with the analysis of experience.

Evolutionary system

Organization of successive cycles of practice renewal; not the theory of the biological hierarchy of humans.

Culture

Work with language, memory, art, craft, heritage and meaning in their context.

Scientific approach

Checkable issue, sources, method, data, and output within defined limits.

Working Standard

Agreed version of the requirements for the result, the process and the conditions for its receipt.

Proof of result

A source, record, sample, protocol, or calculation sufficient for a particular criterion.

Related Balance

Project record of need, resource, action and change with units and links.

Archive

Materials together with origin, authorship, version, verification and access rights.

Acceptance

Decision on the work presented and agreed criteria; not giving a person dignity.

Scaling

Checking and adapting the way of working in another context after reviewing the first experience.

Continuity and rule of the new version

The name "FENIX - Evolutionary System", the cycle of five stages, classifiers P, D, M and Q, connection with "Knowledge and Energy", "Culture and Science", Archive and EQUILIBRIUM. This document adds a set of twelve principles, a single dictionary and three basic level forms.

The next revision should clearly indicate what has changed, why and which old records require revision. Approval by the operator or other authorized party is fixed by a separate decision; the date of preparation of the file is not the date of such approval.

SOURCES / S01-S06

Methodological and scientific guidelines

Accessed pages date: 17 September 2026. Numbers S01-S10 refer to this document. References are opened by the title "Official source".

S01 / UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. Lifelong learning

Different ages, forms and contexts of learning. Used in section 05 and international part.

Official source

S02 / UNESCO. Framework Programme on Culture and Art Education, 2024

Official communication 15.02.2024 and reference to the framework. Used in section 04.

Official source

S03 / UNESCO. Open Science Recommendation 2021

Official text, adopted 23.11.2021. Transparency, access and responsible reuse of knowledge.

Official source

S04 / UNESCO. Recommendation on Open Educational Resources, 2019

Official text, adopted 25.11.2019. Definition of open resources and licenses; conditions of exchange.

Official source

S05 / UNESCO. Recommendation Concerning the Ethical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, 2021

The official text. Human responsibility, supervision and rights; an international reference point.

Official source

S06 / International Bureau of Weights and Measures. International System of Units (SI)

Official definitions of units and reference to the SI brochure. The difference between power and energy.

Official source

The principles, forms, schedule and methods of internal verification FENIX are design solutions. The sources do not confirm the effectiveness of the program already achieved and do not mean approval from their authors.

SOURCES / S07-S10

Legal support and documents of series

S07 / Constitution of the Russian Federation, articles 43–44

Official page of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. Education, self-education, creativity and cultural life.

Official source

S08 Federal Law of 29.12.2012 № 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation"

The card of the official initial publication from 30.12.2012. The current version and mode of specific activity are checked before launch.

Official source

S09 / Federal Law No. 152-FZ of 27.07.2006 “On Personal Data”

Available departmental text on the website of the Ministry of Labor of Russia. The completeness of the changes for a particular operation requires additional reconciliation.

Official source

S10 / Civil Code of the Russian Federation, part IV

Official page of Rospatent. For a specific method of using the material, the current norm and legal basis are checked.

Official source

Internal basis of continuity

"FENIX - Evolutionary system", working concept 1.0; "Designer of the ideal standard", working concept 1.0; "The basics of self-development. Culture and Science”, working concept 1.0; previously prepared set of “Fundamentals of legislation in the areas”.

The source Word documents from this correspondence are used for reconciliation. Titles P01–P13 and D01–D19, Fields M01–M13 and verification Q01–Q20 transferred from text documents of the series; different numbering on individual illustrations was not used.

Meaning of "Fundamentals"

Each cycle has a clear question, a voluntary participant, available knowledge, proven resources, safe practices, and an honestly described outcome.

Published files

Culture, science and training · Full published text

FENIX — Culture and Science. Teaching and Methodology Document

Source status: Author's working concept 1.0; document for discussion and approval

An extended self-development module for adults: eight learning modules, 19 areas of practice and six working forms. It proposes a 12-week, 36-hour pathway, cultural work, a research task, verification of results and preservation of experience; timing and conditions require agreement.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/library/fenix-culture-science-document.html

Open on the site

PROGRAM OF PEOPLE'S SELF-DEVELOPMENT

FENIX

EVOLUTION SYSTEM

BASES
SELF-DEVELOPMENT

Culture and science

UNDERSTAND → RESEARCH → CREATE → TRANSFER

Methodology • 8 Training Modules • 19 Directions • 6 Working Forms

Working concept 1.0 | 17 September 2026

01 / PASSPORT AND NAVIGATION

From interest to independent action

"FENIX - Fundamentals of self-development. Culture and Science” is a training and methodological module of the program of national self-development “Knowledge and Energy”.

The working sense of self-development: a person chooses the question, master the way of action, creates work, checks it and retains experience. Culture reveals language, memory, values and forms of creativity. Science provides methods for research, argumentation, and verification of claims.

Parameter

Proposed action

Audience

Adults with different experiences; no special training required.

Format

12 weeks, 36 hours of total participant planning time; a shortened route is possible.

Result

Personal itinerary, cultural work, research record and contribution to the overall project.

Status

Concept 1.0. Not an approved standard, not a license, and not a promise of qualification.

How to use

Meaning and practice - c. 3–8. Training route - with. 9–12. Examples and 19 Directions - with. 13–17. Reference, verification and evaluation — c. 18–22. Legal and international part - c. 23–24. Six working forms - with. 25–30. Sources - with. 31–32.

Admission is free by human choice; the pace is consistent. The standard applies to work and conditions, not to the participant's dignity or beliefs.

02 / BASIC

Culture and science: different issues, general practice

The program does not contrast creative and research thinking and does not mix their criteria.

Area

Main question

Work of the participant

Culture

How do we understand, express and communicate our experiences?

Reading, interpretation, creativity, dialogue, preservation of memory.

Science

What happens, how to explain and verify?

Question, method, data, comparison, output boundaries.

General practice

What do we create and what are we responsible for?

Useful result, transparent sources, security and authorship.

Consciousness → meaning → creation

In this module, it is an organizational formula: notice your question; determine why it is important; do the work you can. It is not stated by a universal physical law or a scientifically established stage of personality development.

The UNESCO Framework Programme 2024 and Guideline 2025 address culture and the arts in relation to learning in different educational environments. Here they are used as benchmarks, not proof of the effectiveness of the proposed course. [S01, S02]

The beauty of the image does not prove a scientific thesis. Scientific calculation by itself does not choose for a person his goals and values.

Creative work allows for several interpretations. Claims about the author, the origin of the item, the historical date or action of the device require verification of sources and data.

03 / PERSONAL CHOICE

13 contours - menu, not a ladder of people

Saved P01-P13 from "FENIX - Evolutionary System". For the first cycle, one main and one supporting circuit is enough.

Code

Contour

Application in module

P01

Health

Affordable load and safe participation

P02

Consciousness

Attention to your own choices and actions

P03

Mind

Questions, arguments, verification of conclusions

P04

Emotions

Name of experience without imposing interpretation

P05

Skills

Observed action and feedback

P06

Education

Individual route and sources

P07

Work and skill

Quality of work and tool development

P08

Economics and financial independence

Time, materials and costs plan

P09

Family and communities

Dialogue and voluntary transfer of experience

P10

Creativity and culture

Reading, Art, Craft and Heritage

P11

Nature and Service to the Earth

Careful monitoring of the place of life

P12

Spirituality

Personal reflection; freedom of outlook

P13

Meaning and mission of life

Choosing a useful result and the next step

The main links of the topic: P03 "Mind", P06 "Education", P10 "Creativity and Culture". The remaining contours are included only at the request of the participant.

P12 and P13 do not require a common religion, ideology, or public account of the individual. Rejection of an assignment or change of purpose does not diminish the right to respect and participation.

04 / CULTURAL PRACTICE

Notice. Understand. Create. Transmit.

The cultural part is built around actions available without a large budget: read, consider, discuss, do and carefully preserve.

Practice

Task

Confirmation

Reading and observation

Choose a work; describe what is directly present in it.

List of observations without speculation.

Interpretation

Offer two explanations and show what details they rely on.

Comparison of interpretations; recognition of uncertainty.

Creativity

Create your own text, sketch, sound recording or layout.

Design, Draft, Feedback, Version 2.

Memory and Dialogue

Specify the origin of the subject or story; agree on the use.

Source card and authorized access mode.

Example: History of Family Subject

The participant describes the material, inscriptions, traces of repairs and the owner’s story. The card separates the observed signs, the words of the narrator, the documents found and its own interpretation. The unknown author remains unidentified; personal history is not declared the history of all families.

The discussion begins with the question “What have you noticed?” and not “How should I understand?”. The review relates to work: clarity, reasonableness, accuracy of execution. Preference for one genre does not become an assessment of the cultural value of a person.

Preservation of heritage is not copying indiscriminately: origin, context, rights and the ability to correct the description are important. [S11, S13]

05 / SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE

From curiosity to testable question

It offers a simple learning cycle that is suitable for safe observations, open data and small calculations.

Step

What to write

1. Question

One object and one difference that can be observed.

2. Backgrounds

What is already known; what sources are available; where is the gap.

3. Plan

Method, conditions, units, comparison and stop rule.

4. Data

Original records without removing inconvenient values; skips separately.

5. Analysis

Calculation or comparison; alternative explanations.

6. Verification

Another participant repeats the calculation; if possible, a new observation.

7. Conclusion

What is supported by the data that is not established and where the conclusion is not applicable.

The National Academies report distinguishes between recalculating on the same data and re-investigating with new data. In FENIX there are two separate marks: "calculation checked" and "observation repeated". None automatically proves the transferability of the result to another site. [S06]

The absence of the expected effect is an acceptable result. A small study observation does not have to end with an opening.

Studies with health effects, hazardous substances, electrical installations or personal data are not launched under this general scheme without separate professional and legal training.

06 / KNOWLEDGE

Differentiate statements before arguing

The same topic may contain fact, hypothesis, interpretation, and value choices. They need different questions.

Type

Example

How to apply

Observation / Fact

"The picture shows an inscription; source dated".

Specify the source, conditions and limit of accuracy.

Hypothesis

"Location change will improve score".

Check and possible refutation.

Interpretation

"This image expresses the experience of loss."

Show details and allow a different interpretation.

Value / Purpose

"We want to preserve the memory of this place."

Discuss voluntariness, consequences and consent.

Checking the source for one lesson

Find the author and date, open the source material, specify the context and type of publication. Compare with an independent source: two retellings of the same news are not two independent confirmations. Save the link and write down briefly what the source does not prove.

AI - assistant, not a witness

In module AI is used for draft, explanation of terms and search for spaces. A person opens the named sources, checks quotes and calculations, fixes corrections. Personal and private data are not uploaded to a third-party service without a set basis and verification of conditions. [S07, S12]

Tag in the Archive: "verified source", "training practice", "hypothesis", "author's interpretation". The answer AI does not receive the status of fact only because of a confident tone.

07 / BASICS OF SELF-TRAINING

Small action, feedback, new cycle

Suggested rhythm of the lesson: see the problem → study the material → restore the meaning with your words → apply → check.

Learning without the promise of universal impact

The Karpicke and Blunt experiment (2011) on scientific texts showed the benefit of the practice of extracting from memory in the studied conditions. For FENIX, it is suggested to try a short reproduction and check your own result; the study does not guarantee the same effect for each person and any topic. [S05]

Reception

Proposed action

Question before reading

Write down what you are looking for an answer to. Do not try to master the whole subject at once.

Retelling without a hint

Close the material, explain the main thing, then check and correct.

Practice with feedback

Do a little work and get a comment on a specific action.

Return to topic

Return to the task on another day; choose the time according to the complexity and load.

Promotion Magazine

Record what has been done, difficulty, help and the next step.

Three Energy Values in the Program

Time and attention are personal resources; collaboration is organizational resources; electricity and heat are physical resources. They are counted separately. “Flame” FENIX is a metaphor for practice, not a measurement of a person’s condition.

The plan must be put into real life. Overload reduces the amount of work, changes the mode of participation or pause; public censure does not apply.

08 / MARCHRUT

12 Weeks / 36 Hours

This is a single participant’s proposed workload, including meetings, practice, and self-employment, not just classroom hours.

Period

Contents

Clock

Withdrawal

Weeks 1–4

U01-U04: question, culture, memory, creativity

12

Personal route and cultural work

Weeks 5–8

U05-U08: science, data, AI, general project

12

Protocol, verified sources, passport

Weeks 9–10

Practical project on the selected topic

6

Result version and primary records

Week 11

Review by other participant and correction

3

Verification protocol and version 2

Week 12

Show work, Archive and next step

3

Authorized contribution to the Archive and the new route

Calculation: 8 Modules × 3 Hours = 24 hours; project 6 hours; checking 3 hours; transfer of experience 3 hours. Total 36 hours. Example of Weekly Distribution: 60 Minutes of Meeting, 60 minutes of practice and 60 minutes of independent work.

Five stages FENIX

The spark is a personal question. Fire is study and creation. Ashes are the analysis of errors and unverified assumptions. Ascension - clarification and confirmation of work. Flight is a voluntary transfer of experience. The stages can be repeated; they do not measure a person's "level".

The basic version is for adults. The format for children and adolescents requires a separate age methodology, organization of security and interaction with legal representatives.

09 / TRAINING MODULES

Cultural background

Each module is designed for 3 hours of total time; the volume and method of execution are adapted.

Module

Practice

Result

U01 / Attention and personal question

Choose one task: what I want to understand or learn to do. Share the interest, responsibility and expectations of others.

Short route; coordinated load.

U02 / Reading and cultural context

To analyze a text, image or musical work: observation, context, interpretation.

Card of the work with two justified interpretations.

U03 / Memory and heritage

Describe the subject or story; establish the origin, agree on the record and publication.

A history card showing the unknown.

U04 / Creativity and craftsmanship

Create a text, sketch, layout or safe craft sample; check by design.

Version 1, review and revised version.

Scenario of one lesson

Start: The participant specifies the task and the expected result. Then the presenter shows a small example and gives time for independent work. In conclusion, the participant shows what has been done, names one restriction and chooses the next step.

The criterion for completion is the work presented and clear feedback. Visiting by itself does not confirm the learning of the skill.

Written, oral and visual responses are allowed. For auditory, visual, motor, or digital barriers, an alternative pathway is suggested in advance. Adaptation does not diminish the value of the result.

10 / TRAINING MODULES

Research basis

Each module is designed for 3 hours of total time; the volume and method of execution are adapted.

Module

Practice

Result

U05 / Scientific question and source

Formulate the question being checked; find the original source and alternative explanation.

Question, expected observation, inspection plan.

U06 / Observation and data

Set the object, units and conditions; write the initial data and omissions; repeat the calculation.

Log and output with restrictions.

U07 / Digital Literacy and AI

Verify answer AI from external sources; separate draft from proof.

Verification and rectification report.

U08 / General Project

Combine cultural work with research, fill in passport and criteria.

Passport M01-M13 and project plan.

Scenario of one lesson

Start: The participant specifies the task and the expected result. Then the presenter shows a small example and gives time for independent work. In conclusion, the participant shows what has been done, names one restriction and chooses the next step.

The criterion for completion is the work presented and clear feedback. Visiting by itself does not confirm the learning of the skill.

Written, oral and visual responses are allowed. For auditory, visual, motor, or digital barriers, an alternative pathway is suggested in advance. Adaptation does not diminish the value of the result.

11 / LOCAL CENTER

Workshop of Culture and Scientific Thinking

Proposed pilot unit: one agreed site, 20 adult participants, two mentors and two projects.

Role

Responsibility

Participant

Goal selection, work, source fixation and feedback.

The Culture Mentor

Context, authorship, creative practice and careful dialogue.

Research Mentor

Question, method, data quality and conclusion boundaries.

Site operator

Access, Arrangements, Resources, Security and Treatment.

Reviewer

Checking work on criteria; disclosure of conflict of interest.

Continuity of Pilot

The full model of the previous program is three centers, 60 participants, six mentors and six projects. This module may be its teaching content, rather than another group on top of the same people. One participant and one result are not counted twice.

Minimum set of resources

Space or remote channel; library of legally available materials; paper or computer; authorized samples; place of storage of works; contact responsible. For measurements - a suitable device and a trained mentor. The estimate is made after the agreement of the site, without assuming the received funding.

The workshop can run on paper. EQUILIBRIUM and the digital Archive help store communications and versions, but developing a large platform is not a condition for starting.

12 / EXAMPLE 1

The Story of One Thing

Cultural research project: the participant describes the object of everyday life, finds out its origin and creates a small exposition.

Element

Working solution

Main code

D02 “Education and Knowledge”; links to D14, D15, D17. Personal choice — P06 and P10.

Cultural work

Photo or drawing, owner's story, short author's essay.

Research

Inscriptions, materials by sources, documents, comparison of versions of origin.

Working Standard

A card with separation of observation, evidence and interpretation; rights and unknowns are indicated.

Evidence

Links, authorized copies, date of entry, correction and review of the verifier.

Working arrangements

Agree on the owner's participation and handling of the subject. First describe the signs, then write down the story, then look for the documents. Don't make it into a beautiful story. Prepare the signature for the exhibition and let the owner check the information about it.

Reception

Another participant can understand where each statement came from and what elements are the author's reading. The absence of the document is recorded honestly. Publication is agreed separately from participation in the meeting.

A learning example is not an examination of authenticity, an estimate of market value, or a permission to restore an item. Family history does not become public automatically.

13 / EXAMPLE 2

Light for reading

The educational project connects the culture of the readership with the observation of physical conditions and the consideration of resources.

Cultural question: how to make the reader's place understandable and convenient for the selected user? Research question: how do the readings on one section of the table change at the two pre-described positions of the permitted table lamp?

What to fix

How to ensure comparability

Object

One table, one lamp, one point and the orientation of the sensor.

Terms

Time, daylight, lamp position, mode, instrument and its limitations.

Observations

Alternating conditions A ?B ?A ?B, multiple entries; no choice of only convenient values.

Resource

Working hours and energy consumption data are separate from light.

Conclusion

The difference within this experience; the reasons for the possible differences.

Project output

A sketch of the reader's place, an observation protocol, the original journal, a repeated calculation and a list of questions to the specialist. Links: main D09; D02, D13, D14 and D18. Subjective feedback about comfort is stored separately from the readings of the device.

Only regular safe use of a serviceable lamp. No work with wiring, autopsy or self-assembly. Telephone application - demonstration, not sanitary examination.

Changes in readings do not prove improvements in health, vision, or learning. Other methods and professional evaluation are needed for such assertions. Numbers of results are not given in advance.

14 / EXAMPLE 3

Live map of the place

A general project about the history and the observed state of the permitted route: yard, street, park or site area.

Layer

Contents

Culturally

Names, stories, crafts, memorable places; source and context of each description.

Research

Dated observations of accessibility, visible objects and seasonal changes.

Project

Offer to the owner or responsible: what can be clarified, preserved or improved.

Archival

Map version, source records, rights and a list of unconfirmed information.

Boundaries

Observations are conducted from authorized places, without visiting closed objects and publishing private addresses. For natural objects, sampling, damage, feeding of animals and other interference are excluded. The uncertain definition of the species remains preliminary.

Criteria

For each point, there is a date, source or observation and access mode. The historical version is separated from the legend. The proposals are formulated as proposals, not as a decision for the owner. Another participant checks one selected point and explains the discrepancy.

Main code D13. Contacts D02, D07, D12, D14, D15 and D17 selected for actual work. The presence of the card does not confirm the legal status of the territory or environmental safety.

15 / 19 DIRECTIONS

Culture and science in all directions

D01–D19 are retained from the base programme. Culture here is a cross-cutting practice, not a new twentieth direction.

Code / Direction

Example of work

What to Show/Limit

D01 / People and Health

Accessibility map of the cultural site

Checking the route, not the medical conclusion

D02 / Education and knowledge

Reading and Research Workshop

Participant's work and source card

D03 / Natural climate

Calendar of seasonal observations

Dates and conditions; no global conclusions

D04 / Land and soil

History of use of the training area

Sources and permission to observe

D05 / Water

History of the local water body and water journal

History apart from quality analysis

D06 / Air

Monitoring of accommodation conditions

Journal; not a conclusion on sanitary standards

D07 / Biocenoses

Atlas of local observations

Photo, date; indefinite appearance and marked

D08 / Food

Cultural history of the dish and accounting for losses

Source of prescription; no therapeutic promises

D09 / Energy

Reading Place: Light and Expense

Measurements under the described conditions

D10 / Materials

Catalogue of ceramics and synthetic crystals

Origin and properties by source

One project selects the main D-code and only significant connections. Different units do not add up to the overall development score.

The table offers topics but does not approve accessibility of sites, partnerships, and permissions. The training material is adapted to the group experience and the actual legal model.

16 / 19 DIRECTIONS

Continuation of the direction matrix

D01–D19 are retained from the base programme. Culture here is a cross-cutting practice, not a new twentieth direction.

Code / Direction

Example of work

What to Show/Limit

D11 / Industry

Product history and map of its manufacture

Process diagram; hazardous operations excluded

D12 / Transport

Cultural Route and Its Accessibility

Checking the path without interfering with traffic

D13 / Cities and settlements

Live map of places and public spaces

Authorized data and offers to the owner

D14 / Science

Question, protocol and repeatable calculation

Data, method and output limits

D15 / Digital Environment and AI

Digital catalogue and verification of answers AI

Sources, access rights, change log

D16 / Economics and Finance

Estimates of cultural and scientific workshop

Plan and fact; no appreciation of human value

D17 / Social system

Intergenerational exchange of skills

Volunteering, Accessibility, Feedback

D18 / Security and Sustainability

Passport of risks of occupations and sites

Responsible and understandable stop conditions

D19 / Development Management

Register of tasks, solutions and versions

Responsible, time-bound and evidence

One project selects the main D-code and only significant connections. Different units do not add up to the overall development score.

The table offers topics but does not approve accessibility of sites, partnerships, and permissions. The training material is adapted to the group experience and the actual legal model.

17 / DETAIL CONSTRUCTOR

13 fields — one clear passport

Saved M01–M13 from the previous module. Personal contours P01–P13 and passport fields M01–M13 — Different Lists.

Code

Field

What to write

M01

Identification

Name, code, version, date and status

M02

Need

Whose task it is and how the request is substantiated

M03

Participants

Author, mentor, operator, reviewer

M04

Boundaries

Object, audience, period, exceptions

M05

Areas

Primary D-code, connections and selected P-areas

M06

Knowledge

Sources, skills, method and rights of use

M07

Result

Image → working requirements → actual work

M08

Plan

Steps, deadlines and checkpoints

M09

Resources

Time, materials, site and energy separately

M10

Financing

Expenditure plan, source and supporting evidence

M11

Law and safety

Legal basis, accessibility, risks and stopping conditions

M12

Data and evidence

Log, Files, Method, Access and Restrictions

M13

Acceptance and continuation

Decision, comments, version and next cycle

For M07 there are always three layers separated: desired image; agreed requirements; actual operation. Changing the criterion after the experience is made out with a new version.

The internal KRISTALL741 model can link 3 layers × 19 areas × 13 fields. This is a record architecture, not a scientific formula for effectiveness or a requirement to fill all 741 positions for a small task.

18 / FULL FRAGMENT

Reference research card

An example for the project "History of one thing". The requirements below are proposed for approval before work.

Layer / Field

Example of recording

Image

The reader understands the history of the subject without confusing memory, assumption and document.

Working Standard

The card contains a description, origin, source of each verified statement, mode of use and a list of unknowns.

Actual data

Filled after work: what is prepared and confirmed; now there is no result.

M06 / knowledge

Description of the subject, search for documents, rules for citing and coordinating publications.

M09 / resources

Authorized access, paper or computer, time of owner and mentor.

M12 / proof

Original entry, links, allowed copies, bug log.

M13 / acceptance

The inspector notes the fulfilled criteria and returns the unverified statements for revision.

Criterion in working form

“In every paragraph containing a verifiable statement of origin, there is a reference to the source or an explicit mark “not established”. Check: read the card and compare with the applications. This is a rule of the card, not an assessment of the author’s talent.

Do not replace the proof with the word “reference”. The accepted work remains limited by its object, sources and period.

19 / QUALITY VERIFICATION

20 checks before start and acceptance

Saved Q01-Q20 constructor. For each item, the status, the reference to the confirmation and the responsible person are recorded.

Code

Group

Verification

Q01

Use

The need is confirmed by the participant or the owner of the task.

Q02

Use

A person can choose a route, pause and exit.

Q03

Use

The boundaries of the object, period, and group are clearly described.

Q04

Use

The initial state is separated from the desired result.

Q05

Use

The criteria are clear to the user and the examiner.

Q06

Feasibility

The necessary knowledge, method and mentor are available.

Q07

Feasibility

Resources are confirmed; there is no double promise of one resource.

Q08

Feasibility

Time and load agreed with the performers.

Q09

Feasibility

The financial plan has a basis and is responsible.

Q10

Feasibility

Roles, powers and dependencies are defined.

Q11

Security

Legal grounds and mandatory requirements are identified.

Q12

Security

Risks, stop conditions and response procedures have been identified.

Q13

Security

The availability and absence of coercion are taken into account.

Q14

Security

Rights to materials and data regime are established.

Q15

Security

Side effects in related directions have been tested.

Q16

Evidence

For the criterion, units, method and decision rule are specified.

Q17

Evidence

Periods and conditions are comparable or differences are explained.

Q18

Evidence

Data, calculations and restrictions are available to the verifier.

Q19

Evidence

The result is not only verified by its author.

Q20

Evidence

The version, revision period and correction channel are assigned.

Statuses: "confirmed", "required revision", "not applicable - with explanation". Unresolved security risks, rights or data block the relevant work. The total rating of people is not calculated.

20 / MEMORY SYSTEMS

Heritage Preservation Archive and EQUILIBRIUM

Not only the final work is preserved, but also the way of obtaining it: origin, method, version, comments and rights.

Register

Minimum recording

Materials and sources

Author; date; link; type; mode of use; check.

Cultural works

Title; author; context; versions; permission to display.

Research records

Question; method; initial data; calculation; limitations.

Projects and benchmarks

Passport M01-M13; criteria; checks Q01-Q20; solution.

Resources and communications

Time; materials; costs; D-codes; units and no take.

Changes and treatment

Note; responsible; decision; new version; access.

Knowledge Flow

Monitoring → Description → check → Authorized publication → Usage → Review → update. An unconfirmed hypothesis may be stored, but not marked as established fact. Open science is used as a benchmark for transparency, given access rights and restrictionsS03]

Access Modes

Open description; group access; owner and examiner access. Personal data are collected only to the extent necessary, for a specific purpose, basis and storage period. Publishing a photograph of a person, recording an interview or private correspondence requires separate legal verification. [S12, S13]

An archival record does not create ownership, scientific priority, qualification, or accounting asset by itself.

21 / RESULT

Evaluate work — not to rank people

Prior to the start, the initial task, criteria and method of verification are agreed. The participant knows what will be considered a sufficient result.

Testable ability

Observed action

Cultural understanding

Separates the features of the work from its own interpretation; names the source.

Working with the question

Formulates a limited research question and an alternative explanation.

Working with data

Keeps logs, saves blanks, explains calculation.

Establishment

Presents the idea, work, review and corrected version.

Responsibility

Complies with agreed rights, security and access conditions.

Three control points

Start: a small independent work without punishment for mistakes. Completion: A comparable task and verification by another participant. Later: voluntary return to the selected action, for example, after 7–14 days. Term is a design solution, not a performance standard.

Program Report

The number of start-ups and finishers, the reasons for non-completion, the share of work with the fulfilled criteria, the actual costs and treatment are indicated. The denominator of each indicator is disclosed. The self-report of benefit is kept separate from the observed skill.

Changing the “before” without a suitable comparison does not prove the causal effect of the course. No income growth, treatment, universal personality transformation or guaranteed discovery are promised.

22 / RUSSIAN LEGAL

Foundations and documents before launch

The format is determined by the actual actions of the operator. The name "workshop" or "people's program" does not replace the verification of the legal regime.

Area / Source

What to check in a specific project

Self-education and creativity
Constitution, Article 43–44 [S08]

Access, voluntariness, freedom of creativity and respect for the rights of participants.

Educational activities
273-FZ, Including Art. 91 [S09]

Educational or educational format; operator; program; license requirement and result documents.

Culture and science
3612-1 and 127-FZ [S10, S11]

Site and facilities regime; agreements with institutions; do not declare an absent official status.

Materials and authorship
Civil Code of the Russian Federation, part IV [S13]

Rights to works, images, records, translations and processing; the procedure for using the works of participants.

Data
152-FZ [S12]

Purpose and basis, required scope, access, storage, disposal and transmission.

Constitutional articles 43–44 lay the foundations for education, self-education, creativity and participation in cultural life. The specific procedures of the activity are determined by the applicable site rules and conditions. [S08]

Work Package

Regulations on the module; information about the operator; rules of participation and exit; agreements with the site; safety rules and appeals; documents on data and rights; acceptance methodology; estimates at costs.

This is a review for preparation, not an individual legal opinion. References include initial and departmental publications; the completeness of all changes to 17.09.2026 is not verified. Before launching, the current version of each applicable act is checked.

23 / INTERNATIONAL PART

Exchange of culture, methods and knowledge

The international bloc continues the previously included part of the program: cooperation is based on sources, rights, clear roles and verifiable results.

Landmark

Application in module

UNESCO: Culture and Art Education, 2024; Manual, 2025 [S01, S02]

Linking culture with learning; adapting to context and accessibility.

UNESCO: Open Science, 2021 [S03]

Available methods, explainable limitations, exchange of verifiable records.

UNESCO: Open Educational Resources, 2019 [S04]

Use and processing only within rights and open license.

UNESCO: Ethics AI, 2021 [S07]

Human responsibility and control of digital assistants.

United Nations: Universal Declaration, art. 27 [S14]

Cultural participation, scientific progress and the interests of the author as a legal guide.

Model of collaboration

The two workshops choose a common question and exchange solved cards, translate terminology, compare methods, and explain context differences. It is impossible to draw a conclusion about the country or culture in one group.

Prior to the transfer of materials, the parties, subject matter, languages, rights, data regime, financing and the procedure for resolving disagreements are determined. National requirements are verified by place of business and actual operation. [S12, S13]

The framework programs and recommendations are not declared mandatory by Russian norms. References to UNESCO and the United Nations do not mean partnership, accreditation or endorsement of FENIX.

24 / FORM F-CS-01

Personal route of self-development

It is filled out by the participant himself together with the mentor. Personal circumstances are disclosed only to the extent necessary.

Field / Question

Participant's record

Name or internal code / date

My question and why it matters

One main P-contour and one supporting

What I already know / what is not yet possible

The work I want to show

Sources and assistance needed

Affordable time / convenient format / adaptation

First step and date of the short check

How do I know I learned to act?

What can be shown to others and what remains personal

The participant has the right to change the goal, pace, way of response or stop the route. The signature in the form does not replace the documents and consents required by law.

25 / FORM F-CS-02

Cultural work card

For a work, subject, history, craft practice or your own creative result.

Field / Question

Participant's record

Name / Card Author / Version / Date

What is being considered or created

Observed details: what is seen, heard, read

Origin and Context / References

Storytelling: Where does the testimony end?

My interpretation and its grounds

Another possible interpretation

What is unknown or requires clarification

Rights to materials / agreed access mode

Review to work / correction / next version

Do not assign authorship and do not publish someone else's story just because it sounded at the meeting. Use mode is checked separately. [S12, S13]

26 / FORM F-CS-03

The protocol of the study

It is designed for safe observations and calculations. The plan is fixed before data collection; changes are recorded with a date.

Field / Question

Participant's record

Code / question / author / mentor / date

Hypothesis or research task

Object, period and boundaries of withdrawal

Method / Units / Device / Limitations

Conditions of comparison / alternative explanations

Risks, permissions and stop condition

Date / Condition

Original entry

Skip/Remark

Field / Question

Participant's record

Calculation and reference to the original journal

What the data showed / what it does not show

Who repeated the calculation / whether a new collection is needed

The result may be uncertain. Do not replace the lack of data with the certainty or beauty of an explanation.

27 / FORM F-CS-04

Source and verification card AI

One page for an important statement. For a conventional source, block AI is noted as not applicable.

Field / Question

Participant's record

Approvals that are being verified

Author / organization / title / date / version

Link or exact location in document

Type: research, normative act, certificate, interpretation

What data and what context is behind the statement

Independent verification / other source

What the source does not confirm

Rights of use / allowable volume of publication

AI: tool, date, task, saved answer

What the person/final status/checker fixed

The final status is chosen explicitly: confirmed within the specified limits; partially confirmed; not established; refuted by the source. The wording and the output area remain together.

28 / FORM F-CS-05

Passport of cultural and scientific project

Single Structure M01-M13. For a small project, a short answer and a link to the application are enough.

Field

Project recording

M01 / Identification

M02 / Need

M03 / Participants

M04 / Borders

M05 / Directions

M06 / Knowledge

M07 / Results

M08 / Plan

M09 / Resources

M10 / Finance

M11 / Law and Security

M12 / Data and evidence

M13 / Acceptance and continuation

Result criteria

Criterion

How to check

Confirmation / status

V M07 separately record the image, working standard and fact. V M12 Specify where the primary records are located. Q01–Q20 applied at the start and acceptance.

29 / FORM F-CS-06

Verification, feedback and new cycle

Filled in for a specific job. It is not used to assign a person an overall rating or a place in the rating.

Field / Question

Participant's record

Project / version / date / author / reviewer

Criterion

Evidence

Status and observation

Field / Question

Participant's record

What happened and can be used

What is not established and requires revision

Infringements of rights, security or access / solution

What did the author accept / what changed

Authorized publication / place in the Archive

Next question, responsible and date

Statuses: accepted according to the specified criteria; accepted with restrictions; for revision; stopped until the risk is eliminated. The decision shall be accompanied by a basis and the possibility of review.

30 / SOURCES

Methodological and scientific sources

Date of preparation and access to the available pages: 17 September 2026.

S01 / UNESCO. Framework Programme for Culture and Art Education, 2024

Culture and art in teaching; international methodological guide.

Open Source

S02 / UNESCO. Framework Implementation Guide, 2025

Practical guide; page updated 16.01.2026. Not performance evaluation FENIX.

Open Source

S03 / UNESCO. Open Science Recommendation 2021

Transparency of methods, knowledge sharing and responsible openness.

Open Source

S04 / UNESCO. Recommendation on Open Educational Resources, 2019

Public domain and open licensing; free access is not equal to processing permission.

Open Source

S05 / Karpicke J. D., Blunt J. R. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 2011

DOI: 10.1126/science.1199327. Experimental work on memory extraction in the study of texts; not a universal guarantee.

Open Source

S06 / National Academies. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science, 2019

DOI: 10.17226/25303. Distinguish between recalculation, new study, and tolerability of the conclusion.

Open Source

S07 / UNESCO. Recommendation Concerning the Ethical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, 2021

Human responsibility and supervision; methodological guide, not a certificate of conformity.

Open Source

Modules U01–U08, duration, forms, criteria and examples - design solutions of this kit. These sources do not confirm the effectiveness of FENIX This does not imply approval of the program by author organizations.

31 / SOURCES

Legal support and continuity

Date of preparation and access to the available pages: 17 September 2026.

S08 / Constitution of the Russian Federation, articles 43–44

The official page of the Ministry of Justice: education, self-education, creativity and participation in cultural life.

Open Source

S09 Federal Law of 29.12.2012 № 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation"

Official initial publication. The current version and actual format are checked for launch, including article 91.

Open Source

S10 Federal Law of 23.08.1996 № 127-FZ "On science and state scientific and technical policy"

The official DOJ card. Mention of the law does not give the educational circle the status of a scientific organization.

Open Source

S11 / Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation on culture from 09.10.1992 No 3612-1

The text on the website of the Regional Ministry of Culture, published in 2023, does not confirm the completeness of the subsequent changes.

Open Source

S12 / Federal Law No. 152-FZ of 27.07.2006 “On Personal Data”

Official departmental text. The purpose, basis, scope, access, storage and transfer of data are checked.

Open Source

S13 / Civil Code of the Russian Federation, part four

Official page of Rospatent. Rights to works, conditions of use and processing of materials.

Open Source

S14 / UN. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, art. 27

Participation in cultural life, access to scientific progress and protection of the interests of the author. The Declaration is not a partnership agreement.

Open Source

Internal basis: "FENIX — The Evolutionary System, v1.0, and "Designer of the ideal reference", v1.0, provided in this work. Saved P01–P13, D01–D19, M01–M13, Q01–Q20. Illustration on the cover - a fragment of a previously created image FENIX.

Published files

Culture, science and training · Full published text

FENIX — Culture and Science. Presentation

Source status: Author's working concept 1.0; document for discussion and approval

A slide version of the learning module: the path ‘understand — investigate — create — pass on’, four participant outputs to be presented and the organisation of sessions. The slides introduce the learning model, while the accompanying DOCX document details the forms and requirements.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/library/fenix-culture-science-presentation.html

Open on the site

Slide 1

PROGRAM OF PEOPLE'S SELF-DEVELOPMENT

FENIX

EVOLUTION SYSTEM

BASES

SELF-DEVELOPMENT

Culture and science

Understand

Explore

Create

Transmit

Working concept 1.0

17 September 2026

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

01

Slide 2

BASIC

Consciousness → meaning → creation

The working formula of the module: notice the question, select the goal and perform the feasible work.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

02

01

Consciousness

What do I notice?

What do I want to understand?

Which question do I choose?

02

Meaning

Why is it important?

Who needs the result?

What conditions are acceptable?

03

Creation

What am I gonna do?

How will I check the work?

What will I say next?

The organizational model is not a universal law and not an obligatory ladder of development.

Slide 3

ENTRY EXIT

Not only learn, learn to act.

Four results of one cycle.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

03

01

Personal route

One question, the time available and the next step.

02

Cultural work

Text, sketch, history or craft sample.

03

Research Record

Method, source data and output limits.

04

Contribution to the project

Verified version of the work and allowed transfer of experience.

Slide 4

TWO OPERA

Culture and science complement each other

Different criteria are common responsibility for the created work.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

S01 · S02 · S03

04

CULTURE

Understanding and expression

Language, memory, values, art and craft.

Work with context and multiple interpretations.

SCIENCE

Research and verification

Question, method, data, arguments and constraints.

Dealing with explanations that can be verified.

Beauty does not prove a scientific thesis. Calculation does not choose for a person his values.

Slide 5

CYCLE FENIX

Five steps in one practice cycle

The stage can be repeated; the name of the stage does not evaluate the person.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

05

1

Iskra

Personal Question

and choice of work

→

2

Flame

Study

and practice

→

3

Ashes

Analysis of errors

and assumptions

→

4

Ascension

Corrigendum

and verification

→

5

Flight

Voluntarily

transfer of experience

Clear problem + available resources + safe continuation.

Slide 6

PERSONAL CHOICE

13 contours - menu of possibilities

To begin with, one main and one supporting circuit is enough.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

06

P01

Health

P02

Consciousness

P03

Mind

P04

Emotions

P05

Skills

P06

Education

P07

Work and skill

P08

Economics and financial independence

P09

Family and communities

P10

Creativity and culture

P11

Nature and Service to the Earth

P12

Spirituality

P13

Meaning and mission of life

Module focus: P03 "Mind", P06 "Education", P10 "Creativity and Culture".

Slide 7

CULTURE

Four practices of cultural self-development

From attentive perception to your own work and transfer of experience.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

07

READING

Notice

Describe the details without replacing observation with guesswork.

DIALOG

Understand

Offer interpretation and hear another.

MASTERY

Create

Make a draft, get a review, fix.

HERITAGE

Transmit

Preserve origin, context and rights.

Slide 8

PRACTICUM

One piece - a few questions

Example of a lesson with text, image, music or subject.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

08

Observation

What is directly present at work?

Context

Who, when and under what circumstances created it?

Interpretation

What details support my reading?

Dialogue

How can I read differently and why?

Establishment

What do I express in my work?

The review refers to the work, not to the author’s cultural value or dignity.

Slide 9

MEMORY AND HERITAGE

History requires care and sources

A beautiful version should not hide the gaps in origin.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

S12 · S13

09

CONTENTS

Share on card

Observable signs.

The narrator's words.

Documents found.

Author's interpretation.

ACCESS

Agree separately

Recording the conversation.

Use of images.

Publication of name and history.

Correction of description.

The unknown author or date remains unknown.

Slide 10

SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE

Question → method → data → verification

Each conclusion is accompanied by an indication of what experience has not established.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

S03 · S06

10

01

Question

One object

and verifiable differences

02

Method

Conditions, units,

Comparison and Risks

03

Data

Original records

and passes

04

Verification

Re-calculation

or a new collection

Repeated calculation and re-examination are different marks. The portability is checked separately.

Slide 11

THE LIMITATION OF KNOWLEDGE

Fact, hypothesis, interpretation, value

First, determine the type of statement - then choose the method of verification.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

11

Fact / observation

Where is the source, date, conditions and limit of accuracy?

Hypothesis

What to watch and what could refute it?

Interpretation

What are the details and what are the alternatives?

Value / Purpose

Whose choice, whose consent and what are the consequences?

Confident tone, author status and response AI do not replace the proof.

Slide 12

DATA

Comparability is more important than effective number

The learning observation describes the conditions, not promises a predetermined result.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

12

BEFORE COLLECTION

Describe

One object.

Device and Units.

Conditions A and B.

Stop rule.

IN TIME

Write

All initial values.

Time and Conditions.

Skips and deviations.

Modification of method.

AFTER

Limit withdrawal

Repeat the calculation.

Check the explanations.

Name the uncertainty.

Do not transfer without checking.

Slide 13

SELF-TRAINING

Learn → to reproduce → apply

Suggested reception: close the material, explain in your own words, check and correct.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

S05

13

PRACTICE

Small cycle

One question for reading.

A retelling without a clue.

Permissible application.

Return to topic.

VERIFICATION

Looking at work

What happened without help?

Where did the error occur?

Which feedback is useful?

What to try next?

The study of 2011 supports admission in the studied conditions, but does not guarantee the effect of the course.

Slide 14

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

Three resources - three separate records

Do not translate time, joint efforts and physical energy into an arbitrary overall score.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

14

PERSONAL RESOURCE

Time and attention

Load available.

Convenient format.

Possibility of pause.

ORGANIZATION

Joint work

Roles and arrangements.

Teacher and help.

Feedback.

PHYSICAL RESOURCE

Electricity and heat

consumption of the object.

Access to data.

Safety of equipment.

When overloading, the route changes, not the attitude towards the person.

Slide 15

TRAINING MARCHRUT

12 Weeks / 36 Hours

Total planning time of the participant: meetings + practice + independent work.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

15

WEEKS 1–8

Training modules

8 × 3 Hours

24 hours

WEEKS 9–10

Practical project

Two weeks

6 hours

WEEKS 11

Checking and Editing

One week

3 hours

WEEKS 12

Transfer of experience

One week

3 hours

Load - project assumption. There is a reduction, adaptation and pause.

Slide 16

8 TRAINING MODULES

Cultural background + research background

Each module is 3 hours and the work presented.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

16

U01

Attention and personal question

U02

Reading and cultural context

U03

Memory and heritage

U04

Creativity and craftsmanship

U05

Scientific question and source

U06

Observation and data

U07

Digital Literacy and AI

U08

General project

Visiting is not a substitute for demonstrating skill: work, recall, and correction are important.

Slide 17

LOCAL CENTER

One site — 20 participants — 2 mentor

Proposed pilot unit: two projects on the agreed site.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

17

Culture

Context, creativity, authorship and careful dialogue.

Research

Question, method, data and output limits.

Controller

Access, resources, security and treatment.

Reviewer

Criteria and comments; not just the author of the work.

Full old model: 3 centers / 60 participants / 6 mentors / 6 projects. Not a double set.

Slide 18

PROJECT 01

The Story of One Thing

The subject of everyday life as a reason for cultural work and research sources.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

18

CREATE

History Card

Description and context.

The owner's story.

My own essay.

Authorized illustration.

CHECK

Origin

Inscriptions and documents.

Several versions.

Unknown marked.

Sources are opening.

PRESENT

Verified version

Card and applications.

Right to publish.

Withdrawal of another participant.

Corrections journal.

D02 → links to D14, D15, D17. This is neither an authentication assessment nor a valuation.

Slide 19

PROJECT 02

Light for reading

The culture of the reader place + observation of physical conditions.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

19

CULTURAL WORK

Sketch of place

For whom is it created?

What is important to the user?

How to make it clearer and more convenient?

What kind of feedback was received?

RESEARCH

Comparison of A and B

One table and a lamp.

One sensor point.

The described conditions.

Journal and calculation repetition.

No interference with the wiring. Not a health test or evidence of health effects.

Slide 20

PROJECT 03

Live map of the place

Cultural memory + dated observations + sentences to the responsible.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

20

The cultural layer

Names, stories, crafts and source of each description.

Observations

Dates, visible objects, availability and seasonal changes.

Proposal

What to specify, preserve or improve - without substitution of powers.

Archive

Map version, rights, primary records and unknown.

Primary D13. No interference with protected objects or publication of private addresses.

Slide 21

19 DIRECTIONS

Culture and science: directions D01-D10

Numbering retained. Culture is a cross-cutting practice, not a new twentieth direction.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

21

D01

People and health

D02

Education and knowledge

D03

Natural climate

D04

Land and soils

D05

Water

D06

Air

D07

Biotic communities

D08

Food

D09

Energy

D10

Materials

Example: D09: readership, light conditions, and resource accounting.

Slide 22

19 DIRECTIONS

Culture and science: directions D11-D19

Numbering retained. Culture is a cross-cutting practice, not a new twentieth direction.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

22

D11

Industry

D12

Transport

D13

Cities and settlement

D14

Science

D15

Digital environment and AI

D16

Economics and finance

D17

Social system

D18

Safety and resilience

D19

Development management

Example: D14: protocol and calculation; D15: digital archive; D19: versions and solutions.

Slide 23

RELATED BALANCES

One job - different indicators

One result identifier; each indicator retains its own unit.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

23

D02 / EDUCATION

Mastered action

Participant's work.

Criteria for implementation.

Checking without a clue.

D09 / ENERGY

Conditions and consumption

object and period.

Original records.

Limitations of comparison.

D16 / ECONOMY

Project costs

Plan and fact.

Source of funds.

Confirming documents.

The number of works, kW·h and rubles can not be added to the total score or take into account one effect twice.

Slide 24

DETAIL CONSTRUCTOR

13 project profile fields M01–M13

P - personal contours; M - passport fields; D - directions; Q - Checks.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

24

M01

Identification

M02

Need

M03

Participants

M04

Boundaries

M05

Areas

M06

Knowledge

M07

Result

M08

Plan

M09

Resources

M10

Financing

M11

Law and safety

M12

Data and evidence

M13

Acceptance and continuation

M07 always shares the desired image, work requirements and actual operation.

Slide 25

QUALITY

20 checks: four groups of five

Q01-Q20 are saved from "Designer of the ideal reference".

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

25

Q01–Q05

Use

Request, voluntariness, boundaries, baseline and criteria.

Q06–Q10

Feasibility

Knowledge, resources, workload, funding and roles.

Q11–Q15

Security

Law, risk, availability, data and side effects.

Q16–Q20

Evidence

Method, comparability, records, checker and version.

Confirmed/required/not applicable with explanation. Blocking risks are closed before work.

Slide 26

ARCHIVE AND EQUILIBRIUM

Preserve not only the result - to preserve the grounds

The result, sources, method, rights and history of corrections are stored together.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

S03 · S04

26

Source

Author, date, link, context and terms of use.

Work

Cultural version or research protocol.

Evidence

Original record, check and limit.

Transmission

Authorized access and instructions for repetition.

Update

Review, fix, new version and responsible.

An archival record alone does not create a property, qualification or accounting asset.

Slide 27

DIGITAL LIABILITY

AI helps to prepare - the person checks

Responsibility for sources, publication and decision remains with people.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

S07 · S12

27

USEFUL CHERNOVIK

Application in module

Explain the term.

Propose a plan.

Find gaps in the form.

Help check the arithmetic.

VERIFICATION BY A HUMAN

Obligatory actions

Open primary sources.

Check citations and numbers.

Fix corrections.

Protect the closed data.

Faith in response to AI is not a learning outcome. The result is the ability to test it.

Slide 28

ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULT

Checking skills, not ranking people

The work and conditions of the program are compared; beliefs and dignity are not evaluated.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

28

START

Background work

A feasible mission.

Common understandable criteria.

No penalty for gaps.

COMPLETION

Comparable work

Independent action.

Verification by another participant.

Withdrawal and revision.

CONTINUATION

Voluntary return

Repeat the selected action.

New question.

Clarification of the route.

A simple “before-after” does not prove the causal effect of the program. Pilot numbers are not a guarantee.

Slide 29

RUSSIAN LEGAL PART

The legal regime is determined by the action

The actual format, operator, site and documents are checked before launch.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

S08 · S09 · S10 · S11 · S12 · S13

29

Education

Self-education/education/program; licensing check.

Culture and science

Site mode, facilities and work; real powers of participants.

Authorship

Rights to materials, recordings, images, translations and works of participants.

Data

Purpose, basis, scope, access, storage, disposal and transfer.

Security

Authorized operations, liability, availability and handling.

The review does not replace the legal opinion; before the launch, the current versions of the rules are checked.

Slide 30

INTERNATIONAL PART

Sharing knowledge without losing context and rights

International documents are used as guidelines, not as a confirmation of partnership.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

S01 · S02 · S03 · S04 · S07 · S14

30

Culture and art

UNESCO: Framework 2024 and Guide 2025.

Open Science

UNESCO, 2021: Transparent methods and responsible openness.

Training materials

UNESCO, 2019: Open License or Public Domain.

Responsibility

UNESCO, 2021: AI ethics and human oversight.

Cultural participation

United Nations: Universal Declaration, article 27; interests of the author.

Parties, languages, rights, data, financing and applicable law shall be agreed separately.

Slide 31

FIRST STEP

Start with an understandable job.

The plan of the first seven days is an offer for the operator and participants.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

31

Days 1–2

Agree on a platform, responsible, access and secure format.

Day 3

Choose a personal question and fill out a short route.

Days 4–5

Open sources, complete the original task, agree on the criteria.

Days 6–7

Create the first version, get feedback and choose the next step.

Do not start with scaling and complex platform: first check one job on one site.

Slide 32

WORKING BOOK

Six forms for the participant and mentor

All forms are included in Word and are available for editing.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

32

F-CS-01

Personal route

F-CS-02

Cultural work

F-CS-03

Research report

F-CS-04

Source and verification AI

F-CS-05

Project profile

F-CS-06

Verification and new cycle

Form should help action, not be more of the task itself.

Slide 33

FENIX / BASES OF SELF-DEVELOPMENT

Culture is the language of experience. Science is the way to test.

Self-development is manifested in independent action, created work and transferred experience.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

33

Personal Question

→ knowledge and practice

→ verified work

→ Next Cycle

The choice remains with man.

Sources, responsibility and the possibility of correction - for each work.

Slide 34

SOURCES

Methodology and scientific support

Available pages are viewed during preparation 17.09.2026; Sources do not imply approval FENIX.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

34

S01

UNESCO. Framework Programme for Culture and Art Education, 2024

S02

UNESCO. Framework Implementation Guide, 2025

S03

UNESCO. Open Science Recommendation, 2021

S04

UNESCO. Recommendation on Open Educational Resources, 2019

S05

Karpicke, Blunt. Practice extracting from memory. Science, 2011. DOI: 10.1126/science.1199327

S06

National Academies. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science, 2019

S07

UNESCO. Recommendation Concerning the Ethical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, 2021

Slide 35

SOURCES

Legal support and continuity

Available pages are viewed during preparation 17.09.2026; Sources do not imply approval FENIX.

FENIX / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

35

S08

Constitution of the Russian Federation, articles 43–44

S09

Federal Law of 29.12.2012 No. 273-FZ “On Education in the Russian Federation”

S10

Federal law of 23.08.1996 № 127-FZ "On science and state scientific and technical policy"

S11

Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation on culture of 09.10.1992 No 3612-1

S12

Federal Law of 27.07.2006 No. 152-FZ “On Personal Data”

S13

Civil Code of the Russian Federation, part four

S14

United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 1948, article 27

Published files

Reference, passport and verification · Full published text

FENIX — Ideal Reference Model Builder. Document

Source status: Author's working concept 1.0; document for discussion and approval

A method for moving from a desired image to a working result profile: 19 directions, 13 profile fields and 20 checks. It distinguishes the image, requirements and actual data, and describes resources, responsibility and version updates; the benchmark applies to the work, not a person’s worth.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/library/fenix-ideal-benchmark-document.html

Open on the site

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY / PROGRAM MODULES OF PEOPLE'S SELF- DEVELOPMENT

FENIX

EVOLUTION SYSTEM

Builder
the Ideal Standard

From the image of the desired result
to verifiable and reproducible practices

EXAMPLE → REQUIREMENTS → PRACTICE → PROOF → UPDATE

Methodology • 19 directions • 13 profile fields • 20 checks

Working concept 1.0 | 17 September 2026

The benchmark is set for the outcome, process, or conditions of participation. It does not determine the value of a person and is not a mandatory model of personality.

01 / APPOINTMENT

What the constructor creates

The designer of the ideal reference is the proposed module FENIX, which helps translate a personal or joint idea into a description of the result, available actions and an understandable verification procedure. His way out is not a beautiful image in itself, but a working passport with sources, resources and responsible.

Key rule

First, agree on what counts as a result and how to check it. Then act. After checking, keep both successful experience and limitations.

Parameter

Contents

Purpose

Preparation of a personal route, training module, practical project, process or site.

User

Participant, mentor, project manager, center curator and reviewer.

Sign in

Confirmed need, baseline, context and available resources.

Withdrawal

Passport M01-M13; criteria; route; evidence; protocol and standard version.

Status

A working concept, not an approved standard, license, certificate or government program.

Continuity

D01–D19 and P01–P13 from FENIX — Evolutionary System, v1.0, are preserved.

How to use the document

First, read the rules and rules of participation. Then select the object and direction, fill in 13 fields, make up criteria and pass 20 checks. Practical examples show how to separate intention from proven result. At the end, work forms and sources are placed.

The numbers, deadlines, examples of requirements and internal acceptance rules in this module are project proposals. Roles, venues, funding and application of specific methods are agreed separately.

02 / SYMBOL OF THE STONE

The ideal image is a guide, not a promise

“Ideal” in this concept means a clearly expressed desired quality in a certain context. This is not a statement about the existence of a single perfect solution for all people, territories and conditions. The working standard is selected according to the need and can be changed after verification.

Concept

Working value

Example

The perfect image

Qualitative description of the desired benefit without substitution by fact.

A person understands the energy of his own site.

Working Standard

Agreed requirements, limitations, criteria and methods for checking the version of the project.

Journal without unexplained omissions; reproducible calculation; specified restrictions.

Actual result

Observed data and performed work with date and conditions.

The journal is received; two lines require clarification; calculation is checked.

Regulatory requirement

A mandatory rule from an applicable source of law, checked separately.

The requirements for activity, security and data are not set by the project name.

Why it is important to distinguish the meanings

In metrology, the standard is associated with the implementation of the definition of magnitude, value and uncertainty. Here another term is used - "project result standard". The card FENIX does not create a state standard and does not certify the measuring system. [S03, S09]

Output boundary

"Complies with the version of the standard v1.0 in the described conditions" - an acceptable form of internal output. "Perfect in everything" and "suitable for any application" are not conclusions of this system.

03 / PERSON IN THE CENTER

The standard of conditions, not the people rating

The person chooses the target and the permissible load. The program can check the availability, security, support and quality of feedback; the work performed has specific requirements. Beliefs, dignity and the right to participate are not translated into an overall score of “ideal conformity”.

Saved 13 personal contours of the previous program. This is a selection menu, not a mandatory development ladder. In one cycle, one main and one supporting circuit is enough.

Code

Contour

Code

Contour

P01

Health

P08

Economics and financial independence

P02

Consciousness

P09

Family and communities

P03

Mind

P10

Creativity and culture

P04

Emotions

P11

Nature and Service to the Earth

P05

Skills

P12

Spirituality

P06

Education

P13

Meaning and mission of life

P07

Work and skill

—

—

Rules proposed to be fixed

The participant can refuse the task, change the goal, request an adaptation and exit. The personal route is closed by default; publication of the work and the name is agreed separately. It is not necessary to disclose medical history, family circumstances, political or religious views.

The check should explain what condition of work is not fulfilled and what help is needed. The phrase “insufficient data” is preferable to an unconfirmed conclusion about a person. Disagreement with the examiner is considered by the other responsible.

Three different signage systems

P01–P13 — personal contours. M01–M13 — Passport Fields. D01–D19 — Directions of practice. Matching the number of fields does not make these lists interchangeable.

04 / ARCHITECTURE

Three layers of one object

For each object, three related but separate layers are retained. The user always sees what was the intention, what was agreed to perform and what really happened.

Layer

What is stored in it

What is forbidden to replace

A. Image

Necessity; desired benefits; limitations; alternatives.

The desired effect cannot be attributed to what has been achieved.

B. Reference

Requirements; methodology; initial state; target values; deadline and responsible decision.

After receiving the result, the criterion cannot be changed imperceptibly.

C. Fact

Data; work done; costs; side effects; evidence; acceptance decision.

Missing data cannot be written as zero or success.

Design objects

The personal route describes the chosen skill. The training module describes the content, support and validation of the development. A practical project connects the result with the resources. The process sets a repeatable sequence of work. The site describes the conditions of use. The territorial task combines several projects without substituting their heterogeneous results with one number.

Connection with "Knowledge and Energy"

Knowledge answers the questions “what to do, why and how to check”. Resources answer the question “how to ensure action”. Separately recorded time and attention of a person, joint organizational work, electricity and heat. These values are not converted into each other by an arbitrary coefficient.

Short recording

Need → Image → working standard → Available Action → fact → check → next version.

05 / CYCLE

Eight steps and five stages FENIX

Step

Action

Withdrawal

1

Clarify the need and owner of the task.

One clear task and consent to participation.

2

Define the object and initial conditions.

Limit of application and initial description.

3

Describe the desired benefits and alternatives.

The image of the result without the promise of effect.

4

Set requirements and method of verification.

The operating standard before the test.

5

Check resources, law and security.

Decision on admission or list of obstacles.

6

Carry out limited practical work.

Journal, sample, actual costs.

7

Compare the fact with the requirements and the request.

Status for each criterion and limitation.

8

Save experience and agree on a new version.

Archive, change, repeat or complete.

Symbolic cycle of the program

Spark is the choice of task and image. Fire is learning, training and practice. Ashes - data analysis and rejection of a non-working. Ascension - repetition taking into account the comments and confirmation of the result. Flight is the voluntary transfer of proven experience. It is the language of the organizational model, not an assessment of the internal state of a person.

Transition condition

At the control point, the clarity of the task, the availability of resources and the security of the continuation are checked. Return to the previous step is allowed. When the boundaries, method or criterion are changed, a new version is created, and the original protocol remains available to the verifier.

06 / SINGLE PASSPORT

13 fields: meaning and requirements

Passports are consistent 13 sections from the previous program FENIX. In this module, the section M07 is revealed through three layers - image, working standard and fact. Detailed indicators are made by applications, so as not to overload the main card.

M01 / Identification

Name, code, version, date and status of the reference. How to distinguish this edition from the previous one?

Example: FEN-ET-D02-001 / v0.1 / project.

M02 / Need

Whose task is solved, what benefits are expected and how the request is confirmed. Is the result needed by the participant or just the organizer?

Example: Participants want to keep an energy log on their own.

M03 / Participants

Operator, task owner, executors, mentor and examiner. Who has the right to agree on the goal and who takes the job?

Example: Curator of the site; mentor; examiner, not the author of the calculation.

M04 / Borders

Object, territory, group, period, conditions of use and exclusion. Where the standard is applicable, and where the conclusion can not be transferred?

Example: One workshop; only reading permitted data; 12 weeks.

M05 / Directions

One Primary D01–D19, related directions and selected personal contours P01–P13. What links really change the project?

Example: D02; links to D09, D15, D18; personal areas P03, P05.

M06 / Knowledge

The necessary skills, sources, methodology, mentoring and rights to materials. Can I repeat and understand this instruction?

Example: Energy units; log; instruction; source cards.

M07 / Results

Ideal image, working standard, initial state and acceptance criteria. What exactly will be presented and what will confirm the achievement?

Example: Journal, reproducible calculation and explanation of constraints.

For a short project, a short answer in each field and a link to the application are enough. The empty field is marked as "not defined" and inapplicability is explained.

07 / SINGLE PASSPORT

13 fields: execution and acceptance

M08 / Plan

Steps, deadlines, control points, dependencies and transition conditions. What is the next step with the available resources?

Example: Agree data → learn → collect log → check.

M09 / Resources

People's time, playground, materials, equipment and physical energy are separate. Is the availability of the resource for the desired period confirmed?

Example: A mentor, workplace, computer or paper form.

M10 / Finance

Plan and fact of expenditure, source, spending authority and documents. What amounts are confirmed and what are estimated?

Example: The limit is agreed in the pilot’s estimate; the money received is not expected.

M11 / Law and Security

Grounds of work, availability, risks, tolerances and stopping criteria. What is prohibited to continue regardless of the expected benefit?

Example: There is no interference with the electrical installation; in case of danger, work is stopped.

M12 / Data and evidence

Sources, Units, Methods, Quality, Access, Storage, and Output Limitations. Is there enough data for the stated result?

Example: Primary log, calculation version, verification act, pass list.

M13 / Acceptance and continuation

Who checked what is accepted, what is not proven, the revision period and the next cycle. What are the reasons for applying or updating the standard?

Example: Status for each criterion; comments; responsible and new date.

Rule of completeness

A completed passport does not mean a work permit. Critical conditions must be confirmed, not just listed. In the absence of a legal basis, admission or a safe method, performance does not begin.

08 / REQUIREMENTS

How to describe the test criteria

Criterion format: object + observed action or property + Unit or descriptive heading + threshold + Terms and Conditions + Term + Method + rule of decision. Not every useful quality needs to be expressed in numbers, but every conclusion requires an explicable basis.

Weak wording

Working language

"Quality training"

The participant independently fills out the training journal, performs the calculation and explains two data limitations on the pre-issued criteria sheet.

“Energy is used perfectly”

Specific consumption for the agreed period is not above the target value under comparable regime; safety and quality of conditions are not deteriorated.

"The knowledge base is complete"

For each card included, the source, date, authorship, rights, method, limitations, and version are filled in; exceptions are shown separately.

“The community is stronger.”

The participants received a clear order of joint work and appeals; the fact of its use and comments are reflected in the protocol.

Three groups of requirements

Mandatory conditions - right, security, data and other prohibitions on continuation. Acceptance requirements are qualities without which the declared result is not fulfilled. Directions of improvement are desirable qualities of the next cycle. The group of each criterion is fixed before the result is obtained.

Four verification statuses

Achieved; not achieved; insufficient data; not applicable to justification. For a mandatory condition, "data is not enough" is not equally "allowed". The average of several successful criteria does not cover the failure of a critical requirement.

Achievement is not ideal

The result may correspond to the selected version and at the same time have restrictions. These restrictions are included in the standard, and not hidden in the notes.

09 / EVIDENCE

Check compliance and check benefits

The engineering methodology distinguishes between verification - confirmation of compliance with specified requirements - and validation - confirmation of suitability for the expected application. The constructor uses both questions: "Made according to the conditions?" and "Does this solve the agreed user problem?". [S02]

Object of verification

Suitable material

Limitation

Skill

Independently completed task and a list of criteria.

Self-reporting and attendance do not replace the work pattern.

Process

Observing multiple executions, log of deviations.

One lucky case does not prove sustainability.

Physical size

Method, instrument, conditions, primary data and quality assessment.

The number without unit and conditions is not suitable for comparison.

User suitability

Real-world verification and feedback.

The opinion of a limited group cannot be considered as the opinion of all.

Expense

Confirmation documents and reconciliation of the plan with the fact.

The promised funding is not equal to the money received.

Measurement quality and withdrawal limits

Metrological traceability links the measurement result to the support through a documented calibration chain, taking into account uncertainty. This is not the same as a digital file history. The procedure required is determined by the type of measurement and the applicable regulations. [S10, S09]

Each check records the omissions, changed conditions and possible sources of error. When the uncertainty range crosses the threshold, a positive opinion is not automatically issued: a pre-agreed rule is applied or additional data is collected.

Chain Break

Source → method → data → calculation → conclusion. If one link is missing, the withdrawal status is reduced to "data is not enough" or "hypothesis".

10 / CONTROL LIST

20 checks before applying the standard

Q01-Q20 is the proposed designer's checklist. These are not requirements of an international standard or an assessment of personality. The non-applicability of the paragraph requires a short explanation; blocking comments are closed before the start.

Code

Group

Verification

Q01

Use

The need is confirmed by the participant or the owner of the task.

Q02

Use

A person can choose a route, pause and exit.

Q03

Use

The boundaries of the object, period, and group are clearly described.

Q04

Use

The initial state is separated from the desired result.

Q05

Use

The criteria are clear to the user and the examiner.

Q06

Feasibility

The necessary knowledge, method and mentor are available.

Q07

Feasibility

Resources are confirmed; there is no double promise of one resource.

Q08

Feasibility

Time and load agreed with the performers.

Q09

Feasibility

The financial plan has a basis and is responsible.

Q10

Feasibility

Roles, powers and dependencies are defined.

Q11

Security

Legal grounds and mandatory requirements are identified.

Q12

Security

Risks, stop conditions and response procedures have been identified.

Q13

Security

The availability and absence of coercion are taken into account.

Q14

Security

Rights to materials and data regime are established.

Q15

Security

Side effects in related directions have been tested.

Q16

Evidence

For the criterion, units, method and decision rule are specified.

Q17

Evidence

Periods and conditions are comparable or differences are explained.

Q18

Evidence

Data, calculations and restrictions are available to the verifier.

Q19

Evidence

The result is not only verified by its author.

Q20

Evidence

The version, revision period and correction channel are assigned.

The form of verification shall indicate the status, proof, comment, responsible and term. The result is a specific decision on the project: allow, modify, suspend or complete.

11 / 19 DIRECTIONS

Man, knowledge and natural basis

The D01–D19 numbering is retained from the FENIX programme. Typical benchmarking objects are proposed below; specific thresholds and permits are selected for each project.

D01 / People and Health

Reference: Affordable and safe practice. Agreed mode of participation, clear route of specialized care and the absence of unauthorized medical interventions.

Confirmation: Map of barriers; adaptation protocol; feedback. Border: Do not evaluate the value of a person and do not replace treatment with a learning route.

D02 / Education and knowledge

Reference: Repeated training module. The participant performs an agreed task, explains the method and can use the material without hidden conditions.

Confirmation: Sample work; criteria sheet; sources and rights. Border: Attending a class by itself does not prove a skill learned.

D03 / Natural climate

Reference: Passport of local climate risk. Observations are time-bound; the proposed measures are consistent with the vulnerability studied.

Confirmation: Log; map; description of the season and withdrawal limits. Border: Local observation does not prove global climate change.

D04 / Land and soil

Reference: Training area with comparable observations. There is an agreed site, method of selection and initial description of the soil and the site regime.

Confirmation: Passport of the site; scheme of points; results of profile analysis if necessary. Border: Do not transfer conclusions from one site to the entire territory.

D05 / Water

Reference: Clear water accounting. Volumes and losses are different; the resolved leakage is confirmed before and after under comparable conditions.

Confirmation: Indications; act; object mode log. Border: Saving water does not confirm the quality of drinking water.

12 / 19 DIRECTIONS

Environment, power, energy and materials

The D01–D19 numbering is retained from the FENIX programme. Typical benchmarking objects are proposed below; specific thresholds and permits are selected for each project.

D06 / Air

Reference: Checkable map of the premises. Specifies the destination of the sensor, location, time and conditions; the limits of the method are communicated to the user.

Confirmation: Testimonial log; device information; profile check if necessary. Boundary: Household surveillance is not equal to the laboratory conclusion.

D07 / Biocenoses

Reference: Reproducible map of observations. The type, place, date and method are recorded; the environmental action is consistent with the regime of the territory.

Confirmation: Observation cards; route; photo with permissible disclosure of coordinates. Border: Do not interfere with protected habitats without a reason.

D08 / Food

Reference: Traceable learning food chain. The origin, storage and distribution of the product are described; safety is checked by type of activity.

Confirmation: Party log; storage conditions; documents of the performer. Border: The training project does not waive sanitary requirements.

D09 / Energy

Reference: Energy passport of the object. The energy is taken into account within the specified limits; the comparison takes into account the mode of operation and significant factors.

Confirmation: Journal; units; calculation; uncertainty and limitations. Boundary: The estimated potential is not declared as measured savings.

D10 / Materials

Reference: Material passport and testing. Composition, batch, assignment and required properties are defined; the verification method corresponds to the task.

Confirmation: Test report; sample ID; conditions. Border: Ceramics and synthetic crystals are not interchangeable without checking the properties.

13 / 19 DIRECTIONS

Production, infrastructure and science

The D01–D19 numbering is retained from the FENIX programme. Typical benchmarking objects are proposed below; specific thresholds and permits are selected for each project.

D11 / Industry

Reference: Repeated production process. The output, technological conditions, quality and safety limitations are set before performance.

Confirmation: Process map; party log; act of control. Boundary: A single successful sample does not confirm serial stability.

D12 / Transport

Reference: Route with proven conditions of use. Availability, time, resource and route constraints are described for a specific group and period.

Confirmation: Map; time log; check conditions. Border: The promised time does not replace the actual availability.

D13 / Cities and settlements

Reference: Available site or environment object. Owner, permitted mode, users and barriers are known; changes are agreed.

Confirmation: Measurements; user route; works acts. Border: The improvement scheme does not replace the project and permits.

D14 / Science

Reference: Reproduced research protocol. The question, hypothesis, method, initial data and conditions of repetition are published to an acceptable extent.

Confirmation: Protocol; data; calculation; limitations and negative results. Boundaries: The hypothesis is not declared to be an established scientific result.

D15 / Digital Environment and AI

Reference: Verifiable digital function. Purpose, access rights, log of actions, test cases and manual correction method are defined.

Confirmation: Test protocol; versions; error log and access. The answer AI is not an independent proof.

14 / 19 DIRECTIONS

Resources, community and governance

The D01–D19 numbering is retained from the FENIX programme. Typical benchmarking objects are proposed below; specific thresholds and permits are selected for each project.

D16 / Economics and Finance

Reference: Transparent resource and monetary plan. The plan is separate from fact, obligation from revenue, and in-kind contribution from money.

Confirmation: Estimate; contracts; primary documents; reconciliation. Border: Do not summarize rubles, hours, energy and human qualities.

D17 / Social system

Standard: Affordable voluntary service. The conditions for participation, support, treatment and withdrawal are clear; feedback does not entail sanctions.

Confirmation: Rules; impersonal feedback; log of appeals. Border: Do not build a social rating of families or participants.

D18 / Security and Sustainability

Reference: Proven procedure for actions in case of failure. Risks, stop conditions, responsible and job recovery are set and tested in a safe way.

Confirmation: Risk log; training check; elimination protocol. Border: Zero incident records does not prove no risk.

D19 / Development Management

Reference: Transparent cycle of project solutions. There are powers, criteria, evidence, protocol and the possibility of reviewing the decision on the project.

Confirmation: Register of decisions; versions; execution and motivated remarks. Border: The project procedure is evaluated, not the person’s political views or choices.

Related Areas

The main direction determines the owner of the task. Additional links note the impact on knowledge, resources, security, and the environment. They do not create multiple copies of the same effect.

15 / RELATED BALANCES

From reference to change of state

The standard specifies what change is considered necessary and acceptable. Balance describes the need, presence, deficit, action, and confirmed change in certain units. Multiple balances may be required for a single project, but the result is not multiplied by the number of links.

Recording

What to fix

Need and initial condition

Object, period, units, source and confirmed deficit.

Resource and Action

Resource owner; availability; limitations; actual contribution; work.

Reference and fact

Target state; actual value; comparison method.

Inter-directional communication

From which D-code to which; type of influence; expected sign; proof.

Result of the decision

Improvement, deterioration or lack of data; responsible for the following action.

Matrix 19 × 19

At the intersection of directions, a description of the connection is stored, not an arbitrary universal score. Example: reducing energy consumption D09 requires air impact testing D06, availability D01 and safety D18. Savings in case of deterioration of critical conditions are not accepted as a fulfilled standard.

Working interpretation of KRISTALL741

For this module, a display is offered: 3 Layer "image - reference - fact" × 19 Directions × 13 Fields = 741 structural position. This is an information model for reconciliation, not a proven law of nature. Structure does not require filling everything 741 positions for each small project.

Matrix 13 × 20 Connecting Fields M01–M13 with checks Q01–Q20. The cell contains a reference to proof or justification of non-applicability; it does not add new personal contours.

Units do not mix

Rubles, watches, kW·h, water volume and descriptive qualities are stored separately. The balance sheet is not equal to the accounting recognition of the asset.

16 / EXAMPLE: KNOWLEDGE

The Open Learning Module

A training example. The site wants to prepare a selection of 20 cards for self-filling the energy log. All the numbers below are fictional to demonstrate the methodology.

Layer

Contents

Image

The beginner understands the task, performs the action and knows where his competence ends.

Reference

Each published card has a source, authorship, usage rights, steps, restrictions, version, and checker. Two users independent of the author go through the script.

Example fact

20 cards have been produced; 18 have been verified; no illustration rights have been established for the two. One of the two test users could not repeat the calculation without a hint.

Decision on examples of criteria

The eligibility criterion for the entire claimed kit has not been met. The criterion of self-repetition by two test users is also not fulfilled. "18 out of 20 is ready" describes the amount of readiness, but does not turn the whole kit into accepted. It is allowed to separately accept 18 cards as a clearly reduced volume after agreeing on a new version.

Next Action

Replace two illustrations or get permission. Refine the calculation instructions. Repeat the user check. In the Archive, save both the original version and the list of corrections; do not erase the fact of a failed attempt.

For open educational resources, UNESCO links reuse to the public domain or open license. Free access to the page by itself does not confirm the right to process its materials. [S05]

The Meaning of Knowledge

Not the number of files, but the ability to understand, legally use, safely repeat and verify a specific action.

17 / EXAMPLE: ENERGY

A comparison that does not hide the conditions

Training calculation for a conditional workshop. Main direction D09; Communications D02, D06, D15 and D18. The purpose of the example: specific consumption not higher 18 KW·h per hour of operation under comparable conditions and without deterioration of safety.

Indicator

Baseline

Verification period

Electricity

2 400 kW·h

1 900 kW·h

Opening hours

120 h

100 h

Specific consumption

2 400 / 120 = 20 kWh/h

1 900 / 100 = 19 kWh/h

Change in total flow

—

(2 400 − 1 900) / 2 400 = 20,8%

Change in specific flow rate

—

(20 − 19) / 20 = 5,0%

What can I say

The total cost is less than the 500 KW·But the hours of work have also decreased. After a simple normalization of time, the decrease is 5%. Target threshold 18 KW·h/h not achieved: actual value equals 19. Neither attendance nor weather nor load composition in this example is measured.

What not to say

It is not possible to declare all 20,8% confirmed savings from the event. It is impossible to withdraw financial savings without a tariff and calculation conditions. Normalization is not sufficient only by the hour when other factors are significant; in this case, the causal effect remains unconfirmed.

The ISO 50001 is used as a benchmark for setting energy goals, working with data, and verifying improvements. Calculation here is your own educational illustration, not a certification procedure. [S04]

Summary of Example

The target expenditure requirement is not met. Reasonable savings - data is not enough. The next step is to check for significant factors and safe measures, rather than reversing the target.

18 / FULL PASSPORT

Workshop of knowledge: design and standard

Demonstration passport FEN-ET-D02-001, Version 0.1. This is a project example, not information about the open site. The purpose is to learn how to keep records of resources without performing dangerous engineering work.

Field

Complete example

M01 / Identification

"A workshop of understandable energy consumption". Code FEN-ET-D02-001. Version 0.1. Status: Project.

M02 / Need

Participants want to read the allowed readings, keep a journal and explain their calculation. Prior to recruitment, the need is confirmed by a short conversation.

M03 / Participants

The curator of the center is the owner of the task. The teacher is an escort. A group of adults are performers. The examiner is not the author of the final calculation. Names are assigned separately.

M04 / Borders

One agreed platform; log only permitted data. The proposed cycle is 12 weeks. Electrical installation, repair, testing of hazardous devices and access to electrical panels are excluded.

M05 / Directions

Main D02. Contacts D09, D15 and D18. Personal contours by choice: P03, P05, P06. The remaining contours are not evaluated.

M06 / Knowledge

Concepts of energy and power; reading data; log; calculation; distinguishing between total and specific flow; output limits. Sources and rights are recorded in the cards.

M07 / Results

Ideal image: a person understands resource accounting. Operating standard: agreed log, reproducible calculation, explanation of constraints and safe transmission of instruction. The initial skill is checked by the training task.

The number of a specific group, premises, devices and financing are not supposed to be substituted here. They are included in the operator's decision after checking the available conditions.

19 / FULL PASSPORT

Knowledge Workshop: Resources and Acceptance

Field

Complete example

M08 / Plan

Weeks 1–2: inquiry and rules. 3–4: benchmark and training. 5–8: log and calculation. 9–10: recheck. 11–12: acceptance, archive and next step.

M09 / Resources

Mentor; available materials; permitted source of readings; workplace; computer or paper form. The permissible load is agreed personally.

M10 / Finance

Costs are included in the agreed cost estimate of the common pilot; before approval, the amounts have the status of "not defined". Income and expenses are confirmed by documents.

M11 / Law and Security

Consent of the site owner to access the data; rules of participation; safe instruction; data mode. In the absence of authorized access or the occurrence of danger, the action is terminated.

M12 / Data and evidence

Log with dates; units; mode description; saved formulas; criteria sheet; verification comments. Personal contacts are kept separate from the published sample.

M13 / Acceptance and continuation

For each requirement, status and proof are recorded. Corrections are reviewed again. Acceptance of the educational result does not confirm engineering savings or professional qualifications.

Example of workshop acceptance conditions

The journal refers to a known object and period. Each value has a unit and a source. The calculation is repeated on the provided data. The participant explains the limitations. There are no unauthorized technical actions. The publication defines the rights and excludes unnecessary personal data.

Two independent results

The learning task is checked on the participant’s work. The energy effect is checked by the measurements of the object. One result does not replace another.

20 / DIGITAL ARCHITECTURE

Designer as a working system

The first version can be maintained in folders and tables without waiting for a complex platform. The digital interface must retain the same logic: Question → passport → action → proof → solution. Automation does not change the status of the source data.

Module

Minimum function

Request Card

Select the object, the desired use, the main D-direction and boundaries.

Reference Editor

Fill in M01 to M13; bind criteria; show missing fields.

Checks Q01-Q20

Collect evidence; assign comments and blocking conditions.

Practice and resources

Fix work, load, plan and expense fact.

Evidence

Store source, method, date, version, access, and restrictions.

Acceptance and Versions

Compare the fact with the agreed version; formalize the decision and review.

Heritage Preservation Archive

Transfer verified materials with origin, rights and history of changes.

Six Logical Registers

ET - standards; CR - criteria; EV - evidence; PR - projects and routes; BL - balance sheet connections; RV - tests and versions. These are proposed internal record types, not a replacement for previously created legal registries. Each record must have an identifier, owner and date.

Role EQUILIBRIUM

It is proposed to use EQUILIBRIUM to monitor communications, data quality and execution. FENIX organizes training and practice, and the Archive maintains the results. This is the distribution of functions within the concept; the existence of working integrations is not claimed.

21 / QUALITY MANAGEMENT

Roles, Versions and Corrections

Role

What is responsible for

What he doesn’t do alone

Participant / owner of the request

The need, choice of route and suitability of the result.

You don't have to disclose your privacy for admission.

Author of the standard

Requirements, boundaries, method and communication with sources.

Does not independently declare its work verified.

Mentor / Performer

Training, practice, journal and early risk communication.

Doesn't change the criteria after a failed test.

Reviewer

Verification of evidence and reasoned conclusion.

It does not draw conclusions beyond its competence.

Operator / Curator

Authority, security, resources, data and referrals.

It does not eliminate the mandatory rules by an internal decision.

Recording Life Cycle

Project → is agreed for pilot → tested under specified conditions → applied with restrictions → revised → archive. The status "verified" refers to a specific version, object, and period. With the new application, portability is checked, and the conclusion is not copied automatically.

Version change

Changing a goal, criterion, method, or boundary requires a new alignment. The correction of a typo is reflected in the journal without replacing the old result. The application contains the reason, the affected records, the author, the decision and the date of the re-examination.

AI in constructor

Proposed functions AI: search for gaps, offer wording, compare versions and prepare drafts. Sources and calculations are checked by a person. NIST AI RMF 1.0 — Voluntary Guidance for Risk Management AI, not a quality certificate of a particular systemS06]

22 / RUSSIAN PART

Legal conditions of application

The specific mode depends on the operator's actions, type of data, equipment, site and services. This page is a training navigation, not a legal opinion on a particular organization.

Question

What to check before launch

Reference source

Working with data

Purpose and legal basis; sufficiency of the volume collected; access; storage; security; participant rights; publication and transfer mode.

152-FZ. [S07]

Format of training

Distinguish between education, training on the program and the provision of other services; check the licensing and legality of the issued document.

273-FZ. [S08]

Measurements

Determine whether the task belongs to a regulated area; establish requirements for the method, measuring instruments and confirmatory procedures.

102-FZ. [S09]

Site and technical works

Confirm the powers of the owner and the performer, the admissibility of works, technical and industry requirements.

A separate list for a specific object.

Acceptance and publication

Determine who accepts the work; what rights are transferred; what is disclosed; what remains restricted.

Contracts and applicable rules on outcome and materials.

Internal document does not replace external status

The name "reference", "center" or "evolutionary system" does not confirm registration, license, accreditation, government support or certification. The project acceptance certificate fixes the internal solution within its boundaries; mandatory external procedures are checked separately.

For a real launch, it is necessary to check the applicable version of the rules, the date of entry into force of the changes, regional and industry requirements. Available texts of laws in the reference system are used in the preparation; no full legal audit was conducted.

23 / INTERNATIONAL PART

Comparability without confusion of statuses

The international part of the constructor is a common language for describing knowledge, requirements and evidence. It does not create a single jurisdiction and does not confirm the recognition of the standard by a foreign partner.

Landmark

What is it used for

What does not follow

ISO: Quality principles

Understand processes, improve them, and build on data. [S01]

Automatic compliance with the standard or certification.

NASA: Verification and suitability

Separate compliance and utility in the scenario. [S02]

All engineering regulations NASA are mandatory.

BIPM / JCGM: metrology

Correctly designate measurements, benchmarks and traceability. [S03, S10]

Recognition of the project card as a means of metrological support.

ISO 50001: energy management

Build a cycle of accounting, objectives and verification of energy performance. [S04]

Confirmed savings or technology approval.

UNESCO: Open resources

Take into account the rights to access, adapt and exchange educational materials. [S05]

The freedom to copy any material found.

NIST AI RMF 1.0

Organize consideration of risks of use AI. [S06]

Legal guarantee or approval of a specific product.

Exchange card with partner

Indicates the country and parties, the purpose of the material, version, language, units, method, conditions of repetition, rights of use, data mode and the procedure for recognizing the result. Differences in local conditions are recorded by the appendix. With legally significant cooperation, the right of both parties and a specific operation are separately checked.

Exchange Rule

Not only the sample of the result is transmitted, but also the conditions under which it is received. Retesting in the new context remains a necessary project step.

24 / IMPLEMENTATION

Designer pilot for 12 weeks

The module is embedded in the previously proposed scenario FENIX: 3 center, 60 participants, 6 mentors and 6 projects. These parameters remain a calculation model, not a confirmed set. A new network and additional budget are not automatically assumed.

Period

Work

Verified exit

Weeks 1–2

Appoint an operator and responsible; confirm requests, sites, data and secure tasks.

6 applications; map of restrictions; decision on readiness of preparation.

Weeks 3–4

Prepare passports, criteria and sources; conduct training analysis.

6 versions of benchmarks; initial tasks; Q01–Q20.

Weeks 5–8

Perform limited work; keep journals; deal with difficulties.

Primary data and samples; actual costs; comments.

Weeks 9–10

Repeat the check, including the user and non-author verification.

Statuses of criteria; limitations; list of corrections.

Weeks 11–12

Make acceptance or revision; save experience and determine the next cycle.

6 protocols; archival cards; decision to repeat or terminate.

Proposed module performance criteria

For all 6 selected projects, there is a passport, criteria and a named responsible. For each significant conclusion, proof is available or its drawback is directly indicated. All blocking comments have been cleared; the number of incidents is not hidden. At least one result is repeated by another performer under the stated conditions; this is a hypothesis for the pilot, not the promised outcome.

Reason for continuation

The reproducibility of the methodology, the actual load, the reasons for the exit of participants, the quality of feedback and the closure of risks are taken into account. The large number of completed forms does not in itself indicate an improvement. The solution can be "continue", "simplify", "repeat" or "complete".

25 / WORKING FORM F-ET-01

The passport of the standard - the idea

Project Name: ______________________________ Code: __________________ Version: __________

Status: Project/Agreed for Pilot/Verified/Revised/Archive. Owner: __________________

Field

To fill

M01 / Identification

Name, code, version, date and status of the reference.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

M02 / Need

Whose task is solved, what benefits are expected and how the request is confirmed.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

M03 / Participants

Operator, task owner, executors, mentor and examiner.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

M04 / Borders

Object, territory, group, period, conditions of use and exclusion.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

M05 / Directions

One main direction D01–D19, related directions and selected personal areas P01–P13.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

M06 / Knowledge

The necessary skills, sources, methodology, mentoring and rights to materials.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

M07 / Results

Ideal image, working standard, initial state and acceptance criteria.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

The unknown is marked "undefined". For an inapplicable field, a reason is given. Evidence and approvals are attached by identifiers.

26 / WORKING FORM F-ET-01

Passport of the standard - execution

Project Name: ______________________________ Code: __________________ Version: __________

Status: Project/Agreed for Pilot/Verified/Revised/Archive. Owner: __________________

Field

To fill

M08 / Plan

Steps, deadlines, control points, dependencies and transition conditions.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

M09 / Resources

People's time, playground, materials, equipment and physical energy are separate.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

M10 / Finance

Plan and fact of expenditure, source, spending authority and documents.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

M11 / Law and Security

Grounds of work, availability, risks, tolerances and stopping criteria.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

M12 / Data and evidence

Sources, Units, Methods, Quality, Access, Storage, and Output Limitations.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

M13 / Acceptance and continuation

Who checked what is accepted, what is not proven, the revision period and the next cycle.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

The unknown is marked "undefined". For an inapplicable field, a reason is given. Evidence and approvals are attached by identifiers.

27 / WORKING FORMS F-ET-02 AND F-ET-03

Criterion and verification protocol

F-ET-02 / Criterion card

Field

Filling

Criterion code; reference; version

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Object and test property

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Group: mandatory / acceptance / improvement

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Initial state; source

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Purpose; unit; conditions and period

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Method; decision rule; uncertainty

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Evidence; responsible; date

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

F-ET-03 / Acceptance protocol

Item: _____________________ Reference and version: _____________________ Date: ______________

Criterion

Fact / Proof

Status

Note / deadline

__________

____________________

____________

__________________

__________

____________________

____________

__________________

__________

____________________

____________

__________________

__________

____________________

____________

__________________

Statuses: Done / not done / not enough data / not applicable with justification.

Solution and scope: __________________________________________________________
Limitations and reasons: __________________________________________________________________
Checker: __________________________ Participant / Task Owner: ______________________
Review channel and recheck date: ______________________________________________

28 / WORKING FORMS F-ET-04 AND F-ET-05

Version modification and related balance

F-ET-04 / Application for change of reference

Field

Filling

Code; original version; author; date

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

What is changing and why

________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________

What requirements and relationships are affected

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Transfer risks and re-checking required

________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Who agreed; new version; date

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

F-ET-05 / Balances communication card

Field

Filling

Project; main D-code; linked D-code

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Object, period, units and source

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Need → Resource → Action

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Objective and actual change

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Side Effect and Proof

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Double counting is excluded as

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Decision; responsible; next term

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Minimum set

Passport + criteria + primary evidence + protocol. Forms of change and connections are added as needed. No need to create a workflow more than the task itself.

29 / SOURCES

Methodological and legal support

Date of preparation and access to the available pages: 17 September 2026. References clarify concepts. Architecture 13 / 19 / 20, forms, examples and internal procedures - project proposals FENIX, and not the requirements of the listed organizations.

S01 / ISO. Quality management principles

Methodological guidance: process approach, improvement and data-based solutions. An open description of the principles is used, not the full text of the standard or a certification statement.

Open Source

S02 / NASA. Systems Engineering Handbook, § 5.0 Product Realization

Distinguish between checking compliance with requirements and checking the suitability of the result for real application. Industry engineering source; its rules do not become mandatory for FENIX automatically.

Open Source

S03 / JCGM / BIPM. VIM, § 5.1 Measurement standard

Technical significance of the standard in metrology. The design standard FENIX is not declared as a unit of value standard.

Open Source

S04 / ISO. ISO 50001 — Energy management

Open energy management review: data, objectives, measurement and improvement. The numbers in the kit are a training example, not a confirmed savings.

Open Source

S05 / UNESCO. Recommendation on Open Educational Resources, 2019

Educational materials in the public domain or under an open license. The conditions of access, translation and reuse must be checked with the specific material.

Open Source

Status of materials

Open official methodical pages of international organizations and texts of laws in the reference system are used. Full paid standards have not been reproduced. References do not mean partnership, verification of the project by the specified organization or its approval.

30 / SOURCES

Sources and continuity

Date of preparation and access to the available pages: 17 September 2026. References clarify concepts. Architecture 13 / 19 / 20, forms, examples and internal procedures - project proposals FENIX, and not the requirements of the listed organizations.

S06 / NIST. Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), 2023

Voluntary risk management framework AI. The kit uses this version as a methodological reference, without a statement of compliance or approval NIST.

Open Source

S07 / Federal Law No. 152-FZ of 27.07.2006 “On Personal Data”

Available text of the law in the reference legal system. The purpose and basis of processing, the rights of participants, security and data transfer mode are checked for launch.

Open Source

S08 Federal Law of 29.12.2012 № 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation"

Available text of the law in the reference legal system. Education, educational activities, licensing and education documents differ; applicability depends on the actual format.

Open Source

S09 Federal Law of 26.06.2008 № 102-FZ "On ensuring the uniformity of measurements"

Available text of the law in the reference legal system. The scope of state regulation, methods and means of measurement and the required procedures are checked; the project card does not replace them.

Open Source

S10 / JCGM / BIPM. VIM, § 2.41 Metrological traceability

The metrological traceability of the measurement result and the chain of calibrations with contribution to uncertainty. Not identical to the link to the file or the history of changes to the document.

Open Source

Internal basis

"FENIX — The evolutionary system. Knowledge and energy”, working concept 1.0; Fenix_Evolution_Program_v file1.docx provided in this work. It is preserved from D01–D19, P01–P13, sequence 13 Sections and pilot model. Image FENIX taken from a previously prepared illustration of the user; a fragment without text promises is used.

Readiness for use is confirmed for a specific operator and project. Not defined in the document details, powers, sources of funds and partnerships are not considered established.

Published files

Reference, passport and verification · Full published text

FENIX — Ideal Reference Model Builder. Presentation

Source status: Author's working concept 1.0; document for discussion and approval

A presentation of the working design toolkit: a request, an agreed benchmark, action, evidence and a new version. It shows the distinction between image, benchmark and actual result, the profile structure and the process for deciding on the result; this is a brief visual introduction to the detailed DOCX methodology.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/library/fenix-ideal-benchmark-presentation.html

Open on the site

Slide 1

FENIX

EVOLUTION SYSTEM

Builder

Perfect

Standard

From the image of the desired result

to the practice under review

EXAMPLE

ETHALON

FACT

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

Working concept 1.0 | 17 September 2026

Slide 2

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

APPOINTMENT

Not just the image of the future - a way to check the result

At the exit of the designer - a working passport, practice and a motivated decision.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

02

01

Request

Whose task?

What use is needed?

What do we know?

02

Working Standard

Requirements and boundaries.

Resources and actions.

Verification criteria.

03

Confirmed experience

What happened?

What have they not proven?

What do we repeat next?

Requirement → requirements → action → proof → new version

Slide 3

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

DEFINITION

Three Layers: Image, Reference and Fact

Intention, the agreed requirement and the data obtained are not mixed.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

Sources: S03

03

A

The perfect image

Desired use.

Makes sense.

Alternatives.

B

Working Standard

Context and limitations.

Criteria and method.

Version before checking.

C

Actual result

Primary data.

Work and costs.

Limitations of withdrawal.

"Conforms to this version in these conditions" - instead of "perfect in everything".

Slide 4

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

HUMANITY

The standard of conditions is not the rating of people

Personal choice, accessibility and dignity do not turn into an overall score.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

04

Verify

Quality of specific work.

Security of conditions.

Availability of support.

Understand the feedback.

We do not normalize

The value of personality and belief.

The “perfect life.”

The speed of development of all people.

Public Rating of Families.

The participant has the right to change the goal, request help, pause and leave.

Slide 5

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

OBJECTS

What can be designed

A single method is different items of verification and different evidence.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

05

Personal route

One selected skill

Training module

Knowledge, practice and support

Practical project

Result, resources and acceptance

Process

Repeated sequence

Playground

Conditions and availability

Task of the Territory

Related Projects and Effects

Slide 6

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

CYCLE FENIX

Five steps to update the practice

Symbolic names are translated into ordinary actions and documents.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

06

1

Iskra

Task Selection

and desired benefits

2

Flame

Training

and implementation

3

Ashes

Analysis of experience

and errors

4

Ascension

Loop

and confirmation

5

Flight

Transfer of experience

and a new choice

Repeating the stage is normal work with experience, not a person’s evaluation.

Slide 7

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

ALGORITHM

Eight steps of the builder

The working version is fixed until the result is obtained.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

07

01

Confirm the need

02

Describe the object and initial state

03

Select result image

04

Set requirements and method

01

Check resource and security

02

Carry out limited practice

03

Verify compliance and benefit

04

Save experience and new version

Change the goal, method or boundaries - agree on a new version.

05

06

07

08

Slide 8

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

PASSPORT

13 fields save program logic

M01–M13 — project fields; P01–P13 — personal areas; D01–D19 — directions.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

08

M01

Identification

M02

Need

M03

Participants

M04

Boundaries

M05

Areas

M06

Knowledge

M07

Result

M08

Plan

M09

Resources

M10

Financing

M11

Law and safety

M12

Data and evidence

M13

Acceptance and continuation

M07 - image, criteria and fact. M12 - evidence. M13 - solution and next cycle.

Slide 9

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

CRITERIA

The requirement must allow for verification

The number is not necessary. A clear reason for withdrawal is necessary.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

09

OBJECT + PROPERTY + CONDITIONS + BREAD + METHOD + TIME

Instead of “Quality Learning”

Independently fill in the journal and explain the restrictions on the agreed list of criteria.

Three groups of requirements

Obligatory conditions.

Requirements of acceptance.

Directions of improvement.

The failure of the critical condition cannot be compensated by an average score.

Slide 10

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

PROOF

Two questions to the result

Compliance and suitability for the user are different checks.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

Sources: S02, S10

10

Made under the terms?

Verification of requirement.

Primary data.

Method and reproducible calculation.

Solves the right problem?

The real scenario.

User experience.

Limitations of application.

SOURCE → METHOD → DATA → CALCULATION → CONCLUSION

There is not enough evidence - "data is not enough" is recorded.

Slide 11

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

Know what to do and how to check

Three types of resources are reflected separately.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

11

Person

Time and attention.

Permissible load.

Support of the teacher.

Joint work

Arrangements.

Roles and Coordination.

Availability of the site.

Physical energy

Electricity and heat.

Units and instruments.

Method and conditions of accounting.

Knowledge explains action. The resource makes it possible. The evidence confirms the result.

Slide 12

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

19 DIRECTIONS / 1–5

Man, knowledge and natural basis

Examples of reference objects. Specific thresholds are selected for the task.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

12

DIRECTION

OBJECT OF THE STATE

CONFIRMATION

D01

People and health

Affordable and safe practices

Map of barriers; adaptation protocol; feedback.

D02

Education and knowledge

Repetitive training module

Sample work; list of criteria; sources and rights.

D03

Natural climate

Local climate risk passport

Journal; map; description of the season and the withdrawal limits.

D04

Land and soils

Training area with comparable observations

Passport of the site; scheme of points; results of profile analysis if necessary.

D05

Water

Clear water accounting

Indications; act; object mode log.

Slide 13

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

19 DIRECTIONS / 6–10

Environment, energy and materials

Examples of reference objects. Specific thresholds are selected for the task.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

13

DIRECTION

OBJECT OF THE STATE

CONFIRMATION

D06

Air

Verified map of premises

The log of readings; information about the device; profile check if necessary.

D07

Biotic communities

Reproduced Observation Map

Observation cards; route; photo with permissible disclosure of coordinates.

D08

Food

Traceable learning food chain

Party magazine; storage conditions; documents of the performer.

D09

Energy

Energy passport of the object

Journal; units; calculation; uncertainty and limitations.

D10

Materials

Material Passport and Testing

Test report; sample ID; conditions.

Slide 14

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

19 DIRECTIONS / 11–15

Production, infrastructure and science

Examples of reference objects. Specific thresholds are selected for the task.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

14

DIRECTION

OBJECT OF THE STATE

CONFIRMATION

D11

Industry

Repeated production process

Process map; party log; act of control.

D12

Transport

Route with proven conditions of use

Map; time log; conditions check.

D13

Cities and settlement

Accessible site or environment facility

Measurements; user route; work acts.

D14

Science

Reproducible research protocol

Protocol; data; calculation; limitations and negative results.

D15

Digital environment and AI

Verified digital function

Test protocol; versions; error log and access.

Slide 15

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

19 DIRECTIONS / 16–19

Resources, community and governance

Examples of reference objects. Specific thresholds are selected for the task.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

15

DIRECTION

OBJECT OF THE STATE

CONFIRMATION

D16

Economics and finance

Transparent resource and monetary plan

Estimates; contracts; primary documents; reconciliations.

D17

Social system

Affordable voluntary service

Rules; impersonal feedback; log of appeals.

D18

Safety and resilience

Verified procedure for failures

Risk log; training check; elimination protocol.

D19

Development management

Transparent cycle of project solutions

Register of decisions; versions; execution and motivated remarks.

Slide 16

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

RELATED BALANCES

Changing one direction affects others

The link captures the impact and the proof - does not create a copy of the effect.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

16

D09 / ENERGY

Reduction of consumption

D06 / Air

Conditions of accommodation

Not getting worse?

D18 / Security

Critical requirements

implemented?

D01 / Availability

Conditions of participation retained?

Do not add rubles, watches, kW·h, water and descriptive qualities into one indicator.

Slide 17

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

DATA STRUCTURE

741 position — working display of architecture

The proposed interpretation for this module is not a physical law.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

17

3

layers

Image • Reference • Fact

×

19

directions

D01–D19

×

13

Fields

M01–M13

= 741

13 × 20: linking profile fields to checks Q01–Q20, not a new scale for ranking people.

Slide 18

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

QUALITY CONTROL

20 checks in four groups

On each note - status, proof, responsible and term.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

18

Q01–Q05

Use

Request confirmed.

There's a personal choice.

The boundaries are clear.

Initial state is given.

Criteria agreed.

Q06–Q10

Feasibility

Knowledge is available.

Resources confirmed.

Load is acceptable.

Finance has reason.

Roles are defined.

Q11–Q15

Security

The legal grounds are clear.

Stop conditions are defined.

Accessibility is taken into account.

Rights and data are protected.

Side effects are tested.

Q16–Q20

Evidence

There is a method and units.

Conditions are comparable.

The data is available for verification.

Not only the author checked.

Version and revision are set.

Slide 19

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

TEACHING EXAMPLE / KNOWLEDGE

20 cards - does not mean 20 finished materials

All numbers are illustrative here.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

19

20

Claimed reference

All cards have permissions, source, method, restrictions and version.

18

Passed the test

Two of the cards do not have the right to be illustrated.

→

Next Action

Replace the materials.

Clarify the instructions.

Repeat the test.

The readiness of a part of the kit does not mean acceptance of the entire declared volume.

Slide 20

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

TEACHING EXAMPLE / ENERGY

Lower cost does not prove savings

First, compare the boundaries of the object, the mode of operation and significant factors.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

Sources: S04

20

INDICATORS

EASTERN PERIOD

AFTER

Electricity

2 400 kW·h

1 900 kW·h

Opening hours

120 h

100 h

Specific consumption

20 kW·h/h

19 kW·h/h

−20,8%

Total consumption

−5,0%

After accounting hours

Target ≤ 18

not achieved: fact 19

This is a training calculation. The causal effect, without taking into account other factors, has not been confirmed.

Slide 21

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

FULL PASSPORT

Workshop of understandable energy consumption

FEN-ET-D02-001 / v0.1 — demonstration project.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

21

Task and boundaries

D02 + D09, D15, D18.

One agreed platform.

Only authorized data.

No interference with the electrical installation.

What is presented

Journal with dates and units.

Reproducible calculation.

Explanation of limitations.

Safe instructions for repetition.

Educational results and energy effects are taken separately.

Slide 22

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

VERIFICATION PANEL

Four statuses instead of a total score

Each status refers to a criterion and a version, not a person.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

22

Achieved

There's enough evidence.

Not implemented

The fact does not meet the criterion.

Data is not enough

The conclusion has not yet been substantiated.

Not applicable

The reason is stated and agreed.

A mandatory condition with insufficient data does not receive automatic admission.

Slide 23

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

DIGITAL SYSTEM

From request to Heritage Preservation Archive

FENIX organises practice. EQUILIBRIUM connects data and observation.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

23

Request

Object and need

Reference

13 fields and criteria

Practice

Actions and resources

Verification

Evidence and decision

ARCHIVE: source • rights • method • limitations • version • repetition

You can start with simple forms and folders: proof logic is more important than the complexity of the interface.

Slide 24

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

REGISTERS AND VERSIONS

One ID connects the entire life cycle

The proposed types of records complement the project, without replacing previous legal registries.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

24

ET

Reference standards

CR

Criteria

EV

Evidence

PR

Projects and routes

BL

Balances relationships

RV

Checks and Versions

Project → Pilot → Tested in → Application → Revision → Archive

The new context requires a tolerability test. The old conclusion is not copied automatically.

Slide 25

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

AI AND RESPONSIBILITY

AI helps to formulate — a person makes a decision

Automation does not increase the evidence of unconfirmed data.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

Sources: S06

25

Functions of Assistant

Find passes in your passport.

Suggest options for the criterion.

Compare versions and sources.

Prepare a draft report.

Human responsibility

Check the facts and calculations.

Set acceptable boundaries.

Allow or stop work.

Consider the objection.

The source, method and proof are checked separately from the persuasiveness of the text.

Slide 26

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

RUSSIAN LEGAL PART

The name "reference" does not replace the legal basis

The actual activity of a particular operator is checked.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

Sources: S07, S08, S09

26

Data

Purpose and reason.

Sufficient volume.

Access and storage.

Participant rights.

152-FZ

Training

Format of activities.

Licensing.

Status of the document.

Conditions of participation.

273-FZ

Measurements

Scope of application.

Method and instrument.

Required procedures.

Safety at work.

102-FZ

Domestic acceptance does not mean a license, accreditation or state approval.

Slide 27

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

INTERNATIONAL PART

Common language of claims and evidence

Comparability does not mean sole jurisdiction or automatic recognition.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

Sources: S01, S02, S04, S05, S06

27

METHODICAL ORIENTIR

APPLICATION IN THE CONSTRUCTOR

ISO / Quality principles

Processes, Improvements and Data

NASA / System Engineering

Compliance and suitability

ISO 50001 / energy

Accounting, objectives and verification of improvements

UNESCO / Open Resources

Rights, adaptation and knowledge-sharing

NIST AI RMF 1.0 / AI

Risks, Verification and Human Responsibility

Transfer the result along with the method, rights, conditions and restrictions.

Slide 28

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

PILOT

12 weeks: from application to proven experience

It is built into the previous model: 3 centers, 60 participants, 6 mentors, 6 projects.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

28

1–2

Queries

Operator, sites,

Borders and Security

3–4

Reference standards

6 passports, criteria

and initial tasks

5–8

Practice

Magazines, work,

resources and comments

9–10

Verification

Repeat, user

and non-authorial evaluation

11–12

Archive

6 Protocols

and the next cycle

Number and timing - a project scenario, unconfirmed set or commitment.

Slide 29

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

WORKING FORMS

Five forms for real application

The completed tables are included in the Word document.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

29

FORM

APPOINTMENT

F-ET-01

Reference passport: 13 fields

F-ET-02

Criterion card and decision rules

F-ET-03

Verification and Acceptance Protocol

F-ET-04

Modification and approval of the new version

F-ET-05

Balance sheet linkage and elimination of double counting

Minimum: passport + criteria + proof + protocol.

Slide 30

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

FIRST DECISION

Start with one result that can be verified.

Agree before the launch - do not think during the execution.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

30

01

Select object and task owner

02

Define boundaries and initial state

03

Appoint an author, mentor and reviewer

04

Agree criteria, resources and stop conditions

05

Practice and preserve evidence

FENIX: selected target → knowledge → practice → proof → next cycle.

Slide 31

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

SOURCES / 1

Sources and limits of use

Date of preparation: 17 September 2026. References are also given in notes and document.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

31

S01

ISO. Quality management principles

Quality principles and data-based solutions.

S02

NASA. Systems Engineering Handbook, § 5.0 Product Realization

Verification and validation in engineering methodology.

S03

JCGM / BIPM. VIM, § 5.1 Measurement standard

Technical significance of the standard in metrology.

S04

ISO. ISO 50001 — Energy management

Energy management: data, goals and improvement.

S05

UNESCO. Recommendation on Open Educational Resources, 2019

Open license, rights and exchange of educational materials.

Methodological sources do not mean certification, partnership or project approval.

Slide 32

FENIX / EVOLUTION SYSTEM

SOURCES / 2

Sources and limits of use

Date of preparation: 17 September 2026. References are also given in notes and document.

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY • STONE CONSTRUCTOR

32

S06

NIST. Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), 2023

Voluntary risk management framework AI.

S07

Federal Law of 27.07.2006 No. 152-FZ “On Personal Data”

Purpose, basis, security and rights in data processing.

S08

Federal Law of 29.12.2012 No. 273-FZ “On Education in the Russian Federation”

Format, licensing and status of documents.

S09

Federal Law of 26.06.2008 No. 102-FZ “On Ensuring the Uniformity of Measurements”

Scope of regulation, methods and means of measurement.

S10

JCGM / BIPM. VIM, § 2.41 Metrological traceability

Traceability of the measurement result and uncertainty.

Internal basis: “FENIX — Evolutionary System”, v1.0. D01–D19 are retained.

Published files

Practice and Mentoring · Full Published Text

FENIX — Volume II. The Practice of Self-Development. Document

Source status: Author's working concept 1.0; document for discussion and approval

A practical continuation of Foundations: a personal pathway, a mentor, a workshop, one’s own work, verification of results and passing on experience. It contains exercises and forms, an example 12-week / 36-hour cycle and links to 19 directions, 13 fields and 20 checks; the proposed schedule is not a mandatory standard.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/library/fenix-practice-volume-two-document.html

Open on the site

PROGRAM OF PEOPLE'S SELF-DEVELOPMENT

FENIX

EVOLUTION SYSTEM

Volume II

PRACTICE
SELF-DEVELOPMENT

From personal choice
to shared endeavour

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY / CULTURE AND SCIENCE

Select a question.
Master the way of action.
Create a job.
Verify the result.
Preserve and transmit the experience.

Contents of Volume

Working model

Personal route and mentoring

One selected result per cycle

Cultural and research practice

12 weeks / 36 hours - an example for coordination

Workshops, projects and forms

19 directions / 13 fields / 20 checks

Practical continuation of the document "FENIX - Basics". Tom does not assign a person a life goal and does not associate his dignity with performance.

Methodical project. Not a regulatory act, not a state program and not a qualification document.

PASSPORT AND CONTINUITY

How was the second Tom

The “basis” define principles and a common language. This volume translates them into a sequence of actions: from the first conversation to the accepted work and the next cycle.

Field

Contents

Code / Version

FEN-PRC-002 / 1.0 / 17 September 2026

Place in the series

Volume II; "Basics" are used as the base volume, without changing their source code FEN-BAS-001.

Who it is for

Adult participant, mentor, workshop organizer, inspecter and custodian of materials.

Status

Proposed methodology. Terms, formats and criteria are approved for a specific site separately.

What does not change

P01–P13, D01–D19, M01–M13, Q01–Q20; Five Stages FENIX; Volunteerism and the right to review.

What is added

Training scenarios, weekly itinerary, practice catalogue, three training projects and eight working forms.

Three Ways to Read

To the participant: start with a personal task, choose one practice and fill out the form A. Mentor: read the chapters about the lesson, feedback and criteria; then, together with the participant, clarify the passport. To the organizer: to check the site, roles, resources, legal grounds and method of consideration of appeals.

No need to fill the whole system at once

For the first safe step, a question, a small result, a source, time and an agreement on verification are enough. A full passport is required before an organized project with general resources; industry permits - before appropriate actions.

The Rule of Reading Examples

All situations, numbers, calculations, and results marked "learning example" are created to explain the method. This is not a report on the pilot and not a confirmation of the effectiveness of FENIX.

Children and adolescents are not included in the described basic format automatically: a separate age version is designed for them with a check of the applicable conditions. Sources S01 to S11 are given at the end of the volume.

NAVIGATION

Contents

I. PERSONAL MARCHRUT

01. Result instead of promise · 4

02. First conversation and personal task · 5

03. 13 The choice, not the ladder · 6

04. Culture: context and own work · 7

05. Science: question, method and conclusion boundaries · 8

06. How to arrange a training session · 9

07. Mentoring and feedback · 10

08. One cycle: 12 weeks and 36 Hours · 11

II. MASTER AND GENERAL CASE

09. Workshop: roles and conditions · 12

10. Project through 13 Passport Fields · 13

11. Criteria and evidence · 14

12. Knowledge, time and energy · 15

13. Directory of Practice D01–D07 · 16

14. Directory of Practice D08–D13 · 17

15. Directory of Practice D14–D19 · 18

16. Project "One text - two readings" · 19

17. Project "Energy of the training place" · 20

18. Project "Live Knowledge Catalogue" · 21

III. VERIFICATION AND CONTINUATION

19. Archive, Versions and Application AI · 22

20. Related balances without double account · 23

21. Reception, Disagreements and Corrections · 24

22. Russian part: launch preparation · 25

23. International Workshop · 26

24. Pilot results and next cycle · 27

WORKING FORMS AND SOURCES

ADD. Route, source, surveillance, passport, resources · 28

E. 20 Readiness and Results Checks · 33

JES. Reception and card Archives · 35

Sources and succession register · 37

In the forms left fields to fill. Codes F-PRC-01–F-PRC-08 refer to this volume; S numbers refer only to its source register.

01 / PRACTICE LOGIC

Results instead of promises

Unit FENIX is neither an event nor a declaration. This is the chosen task with clear result, conditions of execution and method of verification.

Four different issues

Question

What to write

Why would I do that?

Personal sense. The answer belongs to the participant and may remain non-public.

What am I gonna do?

Presented work: card, text, instruction, magazine, sketch, calculation or sample.

How will we know what happened?

Requirement, method of verification and the person who reviews the result.

What will change for others?

Confirmed user need and separately verified application of the result.

These issues are related, but not a substitute for each other. The written text does not yet prove the improvement of the life of the territory. The reader's gratitude does not establish the accuracy of the calculation. A completed training project can be valuable without a statement of social impact.

Three Levels of Results

First, the work is created: there is a specific file or object. The second method is mastered: the participant explains the essential actions and performs an agreed similar task. The third result is used: the user is named, the context and confirmation of application. These levels are taken into account separately.

Exercise: Reduce the intention to the first step

The initial intention to "create a library of knowledge" is transformed into the task of "preparing four cards on one question and checking whether another person can find a source in them." The boundaries are set: without mass data collection, other people’s unpublished materials and the promise of a ready-made digital platform.

Sign of the completed first step

There is a work, criterion, confirmation and honestly named limitation. The continuation is selected after review; it is not an obligation to the program.

Relationship to the “Basics”: Principles 05, 06 and 12; Fields M02, M07 and M13; Checks Q04, Q05, Q19 and Q20.

02 / BEGINNING OF THE MARCHRUT

The first conversation and personal task

The proposed first conversation takes up to 40 minutes. Its goal is not to collect a complete biography, but to agree on one feasible work and the necessary support.

Part of the conversation

Question and record

0–8 minutes / selection

What do you want to understand or learn to do? The participant formulates the task himself.

8–16 minutes / result

What can I show you? One exit and an indicative period of time are chosen.

16–24 minutes / original work

What's going on? A small sample is performed without an assessment of personality.

24–32 minutes / conditions

How much time is available? What form is convenient? What not to do?

32–40 minutes / arrangement

What is the next step, who will help and when will there be a short discussion?

Formulation suitable for work

“Over the agreed period, I will prepare [the work] for [the user or my own task]. I use [sources and means]. I will show you [confirmation]. I do not perform [excluded actions]. I’ll decide if I want to continue the route.” Empty positions are discussed; they are not filled by the mentor on behalf of the participant.

Initial work is needed to compare, not select people

For reading, this can be a brief explanation of the text, for calculation - an analysis of one situation, for craft - a safe sample in acceptable conditions. Conditions and available assistance remain. The final task should test the same skill, and the differences in difficulty should be explained.

When to start with less

If there is no time, the method is unclear or disturbing publicity, the volume is reduced and the format changes: one paragraph instead of a speech, a paper card instead of an online service, an individual meeting instead of a group. Reducing the volume does not mean reducing the dignity or exclusion from the program.

Result of the first meeting

Completed Form A, one basic P-circuit, one basic D-code if necessary, and an arrangement for immediate action. Personal beliefs, diagnoses and family circumstances are not required.

03 / PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT

13 contours: choice, not ladder

The names P01 to P13 are from the "Fundamentals". Suggested actions - entry options; you do not need to go through all the contours or disclose personal content.

Contour

Proposed practice

P01 / Health

Agree on the available load, breaks and conditions of participation; do not conduct self-diagnosis.

P02 / Consciousness

In their own words, explain the choice of the task and the opportunity to change the solution.

P03 / Mind

Divide in one text the verified summary, conclusion and assumption.

P04 / Emotions

Choose a convenient way to report a difficulty; the content of the experiences need not be disclosed.

P05 / Skills

Show one repeated action and name the conditions for its safe execution.

P06 / Education

Make a small route of sources and tasks on the selected issue.

P07 / Work and skill

Present the original sample, get a comment and prepare the corrected work.

P08 / Economics and financial independence

Compare the plan and the fact of time and expense; do not make unnegotiated commitments.

P09 / Family and communities

Agree on the joint task and contribution of each without assigning other people's duties.

P10 / Creativity and culture

Create a text, sketch or cultural card with authorship and context.

P11 / Nature and Service to the Earth

Make a valid observation and distinguish it from the conclusion about the state of the whole environment.

P12 / Spirituality

Independently choose to work with personal values; the content may not be fixed.

P13 / Meaning and mission of life

Link your own intention to one immediate action; retain the right to review.

One job can have several connections. They don’t turn into separate achievements for each code. The internal personal route and public card of the project are kept separately.

04 / CULTURE

Context and own work

Cultural practice does not begin with the requirement to accept the finished meaning, but with a careful acquaintance with the work, thing, language, memory or way of mastery.

One job - four layers of description

Layer

Example of a question

Observable

What is seen, heard or read directly? Where does your description begin?

Origin

Who is the author, when created, where does the material come from? What remains unknown?

Context

Who was it created for? What information about time and place is confirmed by sources?

Interpretation

How do I understand work? What details support this reading? Are others possible?

The “Two Readings”

Select a small allowed text or image. First, each participant writes their own explanation. The pair then highlights the coincident observations and divergent interpretations. The result is not a vote for the right worldview, but two reasoned cards and a list of questions to sources.

The author may associate work with family memory, local language or craft. An oral story is recorded as the story of a particular person, not as an established fact about the entire community. The refusal to record or publish is accepted without a requirement to justify.

What is considered during the audit

The accuracy of the description of the source material, understandable origin, the presence of context, the distinction between interpretation and fact, respect for authorship. The aesthetic preference of the examiner does not become a hidden mandatory criterion. The creative result can be accepted without the consent of all participants with its meaning.

Leaving class

A cultural work card in Form B: object, authorship, source, context, own reading, alternative explanation and conditions of use.

The UNESCO Framework Programme on Culture and Art Education 2024 addresses education in culture and the arts throughout the life and relationship of cultural and educational spaces. Here it is a guideline, and the procedure of the lesson is a design solution FENIX. [S02]

05 / SCIENCE

Issue, method and withdrawal limits

Research practice makes the way to the conclusion visible: what was asked, what was observed, how was recorded and what explanations remain possible.

From the big question to the verified one

Instead of "does a lot of energy is spent in the study room?" - "what is the consumption of the specified luminaire at a given duration of work on the selected data source?". The second question is already, but allows you to describe the method. Readability, mood and electricity consumption are studied separately.

Step

Minimum recording

Question and boundaries

The object, the period and what the work does not establish.

Method before data collection

What will be recorded, by whom, in what units and under what conditions.

Primary recording

Date, source or device, indication, circumstances and omissions.

Record Checker

Can we trace the origin of the number and repeat the calculation?

Conclusion

What follows from the material, what is not confirmed and what checks are needed next.

Lack of data is also a record

The empty field is not replaced by zero. Changed conditions do not hide in the mean. The unusual result is not removed for the sake of a flat picture: a possible error and a method of checking are recorded next to it. The conclusion about one site is not automatically transferred to others.

Educational research and professional expertise

The training record shows the development of the method, but does not replace the laboratory conclusion, medical assessment, environmental expertise or technical admission. When special conditions are needed for the answer, the project is limited to a description of the question and preparation of materials for a specialist.

Sufficient result

The hypothesis was not confirmed, but the question, primary data, calculation and limitations are described correctly. This is a reason to clarify the following experience, and not to declare the participant unsuccessful.

The transparency of the method and the responsible reuse of materials are in line with UNESCO’s Open Science Recommendation 2021. Openness does not mean the publication of any personal or protected information. [S03]

06 / TRAINING PRACTICE

How to arrange a lesson

Instead of a long review of materials, a short sequence is proposed: a question, an independent attempt, a source check, application and analysis.

Example of a lesson / 60 minutes

Action

0–5 / task

Find out what will happen by the end of the meeting.

5–15 / study

Read a small fragment or disassemble a sample indicating the source.

15–20 / playback

Close the material and explain the meaning in your own words; what you did not remember, do not invent.

20–25 / sparkle

Return to the source and mark the omission, distortion or unconfirmed statement.

25–30 / break

Pause; shape and duration adapt if necessary.

30–50 / Application

Perform one task: card, calculation, instruction fragment or data parsing.

50–60 / feedback

Name the resulting, one necessary edit and the next step.

Return to Skill

At the next meeting, the participant solves a small similar task before re-reading. Then check the method of action and correct the error. The periodicity is selected according to the available time; this volume does not establish a universal rate of repetition.

In an experimental paper by Karpicke and Blunt (2011), the authors reported the benefits of replicating what they had learned in specific scientific text assignments. A methodological critique of this comparison has also been published. The procedure proposed here does not mean that one method is always better than another or that the effectiveness of the program FENIX has already been proven. [S05, S06]

What to do to see movement

The first attempt, a short correction after reconciliation, the completed task and the explanation of the participant. Notes are needed to understand change; they do not become a continuous control of a person. Individual assistance and access to materials are noted if the comparison of works depends on them.

Result of the training meeting

One testable piece of work. The number of pages viewed and the duration of the connection to the meeting are taken into account only as conditions, and not as evidence of the mastered skill.

07 / MENTIONING

Helping without replacing choices

The mentor keeps the task within available boundaries, helps with the method and makes the comments understandable. The authorship of the result and the decision on the personal route remain with the participant.

Short analysis: 20–30 minutes

The participant first shows the work and himself calls the difficulty. The mentor clarifies the criterion, separates the observed from the impression, offers one way to correct. In conclusion, the participant formulates the next step in their own words; the parties agree on a deadline, support or pause.

Unsuccessful wording

Working feedback

"You're inattentive."

There is no date in the two records. Let’s add it so that we can compare the periods.”

"Make it beautiful."

“The reader needs to find the source without additional question. Let’s put the link next to the statement.”

"You just have to try."

"The volume does not fit in the available time. We will choose one card instead of four.

"I would have understood the text differently."

"My reading is different; show the details on which your conclusion is based."

Limits of role

Mentoring in this volume does not include life mission assignment, psychological diagnosis, medical advice, financial counseling, or legal opinion. The lack of competence is fixed; the task is transferred to a specialist or narrowed down to a safe educational format.

Joint authorship and conflict of interest

If the mentor actually wrote a significant part of the work, this is noted in the contribution information. To test an independent skill, a separate feasible task is selected. Acceptance of the disputed result should not be limited to the sole decision of the person whose actions are appealed.

Working meeting record

Shown version → specific remark → action participant → available help → next analysis term. Personal evaluations and assumptions about motives are not included in the protocol.

08 / RHYTHM OF WORK

One cycle: 12 weeks and 36 hours

Saved model from the "Basics": 36 hours at 60 minutes for 12 weeks. This is an example of planning, not a mandatory norm or a promise of result.

Week / stage

Contents

Withdrawal

1 / Spark

Personal question, conditions, small initial sample.

Personal route

2 / Spark

User, borders, work requirements and security.

Passport and decision to start

3 / Flame

Cultural context and first reading.

Cultural card

4 / Flame

Verification of sources and significant claims.

Source card

5 / Flame

Method of action and trial recording.

The Black Protocol

6 / Flame

A little independent work and clarification of the plan.

Intermediate sample

7 / Flame → Ashes

Basic practice; actual costs.

Work and primary records

8 / Ashes

Checking data, omissions and changed conditions.

List of restrictions

9 / Ashes

Feedback; verification of the original hypothesis.

List of specific edits

10 / Ashes

Correction and preparation of the presented version.

Acceptance version

11 / Ascension

Verification of requirements and explanation of the method of action.

Acceptance protocol

12 / Flight

Archive, transfer method, new question or completion.

Experience card and solution

Example of the distribution of each week: 1 Hour of general meeting, 1 an hour of self-study and 1 hours of work on the result. Total: 12 + 12 + 12 = 36 hours of one participant. Breaks are included in agreed meeting times; actual load may decrease.

Transition is determined by readiness

The deadline does not make the work accepted automatically. Return to source, volume reduction and pause are allowed at any stage. The hours of the mentor and the organizer are taken into account separately from the time of the participant.

09 / ORGANIZATION

Workshop: roles and conditions

A workshop is an agreed place to work and discuss, not a mandatory new organization or separate building. The site and its rights are confirmed prior to the invitation of participants.

Role

What provides support

Participant

Selection of the task, own work, communication of the difficulty and the right to stop.

Mentor

Method, sources, feedback and designation of the boundaries of their competence.

Task Owner

Confirmation of the need and conditions for future use of the result.

Site operator

Authority, organizational documents, safe conditions and availability.

Reviewer

Review of work on known criteria; disclosure of interest.

Keeper of materials

File origin, versions, access mode and correction order.

Minimum equipment

Available space, permitted set of materials, convenient way to record, clear contact of the organizer and stopping conditions. A paper journal is acceptable; a digital platform is not a prerequisite for a start. The equipment shall be switched on only if there are competent responsible and required conditions.

Until the first meeting

The operator describes the actual activity, checks the applicable legal regime, agrees on the use of the site, the necessary costs, data rules and appeals. The participant receives in advance clear information about the load, possible payments, training results and the method of exit. The name "workshop" does not replace this check.

Group work without coercion

No public life history, shared beliefs, or participation in activities outside of the agreed upon task is required. Roles are voluntarily accepted. When combining roles, separate records are kept about who created the work and who made the decision on it.

Working rhythm of the site

Opening: task and constraints. Work: help and primary recording. Completion: result, return of materials, next step. The incident stops the affected activity, rather than waiting for a scheduled reporting day.

10 / PROJECT CONSTRUCTOR

Project through 13 passport fields

M01-M13 retained without renumbering. Each field answers the question needed to work together; detail depends on scale and risk.

Field

Practical filling

M01 / Identification

Code, name, version, date and status. Files are one specific job.

M02 / Need

Who needs the results and how it is confirmed. Do not ascribe a request to an absent partner.

M03 / Participants

Author, mentor, operator, user and reviewer; real arrangements.

M04 / Borders

Object, audience, period and excluded actions.

M05 / Directions

Basic D-code, significant connections and voluntarily selected P-contours.

M06 / Knowledge

Sources, method, necessary skills and rights to the materials used.

M07 / Results

Separate: desired image, work requirements, actually presented work.

M08 / Plan

Steps, deadlines and points where you can change the volume or stop.

M09 / Resources

Time, materials, room and energy; availability confirmed.

M10 / Finance

Cost plan, source, responsible and confirmation; obligations are not hidden.

M11 / Law and Security

Grounds, availability, risks, restrictions and actions when stopping.

M12 / Data and evidence

Primary records, files, verification method, access and restrictions.

M13 / Acceptance and continuation

Checker, decision rule, comments, version and next cycle.

M07 cannot be filled with a single slogan. For example: image - "knowledge is available"; requirement - "four cards have traceable sources"; fact - "cards with the listed defects are presented". The empty fact before acceptance is marked "not yet received".

11 / ETALINE AND PROOF

Criteria understood by both parties

The criterion is written before the main work. The examiner must understand not only the desired property, but also what confirmation is sufficient for the solution.

Criterion

Confirmation and decision rule

The source is traced

For each significant statement, a source with an exact location or an honest mark "not established".

The method is clear

The other person reproduces one selected calculation from the original record; discrepancies are explained.

The version is suitable for the user

The user performs an agreed task on the work: for example, finds the desired card without the author’s prompt.

Transfer is allowed

For each material included, the basis of use and access mode are named.

Select sufficient confirmation

Cultural interpretation requires a reliance on material and clear authorship, but not everyone’s agreement with the conclusion. The calculation needs raw data, units and verifiable actions, but not the number of positive reviews. The skill requires observable performance, and the self-report of benefit is accounted for separately.

Four groups of Q-checks

Q01–Q05 clarify the benefits and boundaries; Q06–Q10 — Feasibility; Q11–Q15 — Security and rights; Q16–Q20 — Evidence and revision. The complete list with fields for recording is in Form E. Before the start, the preparation of the method of verification is fixed, upon acceptance - the actual confirmation.

Refinement does not change the criterion retroactively

If it turns out that the requirement is wrong, a new agreed version is released. The protocol preserves the conditions under which the work began and what was revised. You can’t declare success by simply removing an inconvenient criterion from the final version.

Rule of decision

Q statuses: "confirmed", "required revision", "not applicable - with explanation". Unclosed critical risk blocks the corresponding step; the amount of completed items does not compensate for it.

12 / KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

Resourcing practices

A resource is something that can be disposed of at the right time and on a confirmed basis. The promise of help, the allotted time and the actual expenditure are different recording states.

Resource

Planning and confirmation

Knowledge

Available source, right of use, clear material and help with the method.

Time of man

Agreed hours, breaks, format and possibility of load revision.

Joint efforts

Who does what work; common meeting hour and participants' hours do not mix.

Materials and Playground

Quantity, condition, owner, permit, term of return or expense.

Money

Cost plan, confirmed source and actual documents; separately - expected funds.

Physical energy

Object, period, method of obtaining data and units; calculation is separated from measurement.

Power and energy

Watt describes power, joule describes energy; 1 Tue = 1 J/s. For constant power E = P × t. At P in kilowatts and t in hours E is expressed in kilowatt hours. 1 KW·h = 3,6 MJ. This is a relationship of units, not a confirmation of the properties of a particular deviceS07]

Time is not converted to electricity

Personal energy in talking about self-development means available forces, attention and load. It is not measured in watts. A voluntary help clock does not become money, an asset, or a debt claim without a separate reason. The technical hypothesis is not written as an active generation.

What to consider with free participation

Zero payment of the participant does not mean no costs: the time of the mentor, the use of the premises and materials have separate records. Monetary valuation does not need to be invented for the sake of the overall result; it is possible to keep the natural values and the source of provision.

Minimum before action

For a critical resource, the quantity or volume, term, owner and availability confirmation are indicated. When the resource is not confirmed, the project is reduced or the corresponding step is postponed.

13 / PRACTICE CATALOGUE · D01–D07

Human and Natural Environment

Below are the starting training tasks, not the list of permitted professional jobs. The direction number is taken from the "Basics"; restrictions are specified for the site.

Area of work

Work

Border

D01 / People and Health

Map of conditions of participation: entrance, place of work, breaks, ways to request help.

Description of the environment, not a diagnosis and not a medical evaluation.

D02 / Education and knowledge

One question is three sources: cards, your own explanation and a corrected version.

Do not promise qualification; the operator checks the training mode.

D03 / Natural climate

Compare the allowed weather data for the same periods and describe the context.

A short series does not prove global climate change.

D04 / Land and soil

Map of the history of the permitted area: sources, use, observations.

Do not make a conclusion about fertility without a suitable method.

D05 / Water

Journal of available indications of water consumption and questions to a specialist.

Do not evaluate the suitability of water for drinking by appearance.

D06 / Air

Description of the conditions of the room and the source of available data.

The training record does not replace sanitary measurements and conclusion.

D07 / Biocenoses

Dated catalogue of species and habitats observations with confidence marks.

Without capture, withdrawal, feeding and publication of sensitive places without reason.

One job, one basic code

In the project on the reservoir, the main one can be D05, and D07 and D14 denote connections. One photo or record receives one identifier; links to it in other directions do not create new observations.

General criterion

The other person understands what was really observed, in what way and what can not be concluded from this. The unknown species name or origin of the record is noted directly.

14 / PRACTICE CATALOGUE · D08–D13

Resources, materials and place of life

A production topic can begin with a safe study of the source, history of a thing or process. The training workshop is not obliged to carry out testing of equipment.

Area of work

Work

Border

D08 / Food

A product cultural card and observation of losses on authorized records.

Without the appointment of a diet, medical findings and product safety check by household experience.

D09 / Energy

Clear calculation or log of available energy consumption with the specified method.

No installation, opening of shields, repair and testing of electrical installations.

D10 / Materials

Catalogue of properties of ceramics and synthetic crystals by scientific and technical sources.

Properties of a particular sample are not attributed by name alone; hazardous experiments are excluded.

D11 / Industry

A map of the manufacture of a simple product according to authorized documentation or conversation.

Do not disclose protected information; do not replace the technological instruction.

D12 / Transport

Map of the available route for open data and safe monitoring.

Without interference with traffic and inspection of closed objects.

D13 / Cities and settlements

Cultural route of the place: sources, points, availability and use cases.

The sketch does not allow the construction, change of property or placement of objects.

Culture and material are connected through the source

The history of the ceramic thing can be studied together with a description of the technology and properties of the material. If the exact composition is unknown, it is not inferred from the external similarity. For a synthetic crystal, the name, the chemical basis by source and the conditions to which the given characteristic belongs are indicated.

General criterion

A directory, calculation, or route contains the origin of the data, the working purpose, the constraints, and an understandable form of presentation. Advertising information does not become technical confirmation without verification.

15 / PRACTICE CATALOGUE · D14–D19

Knowledge, collaboration and solutions

These directions provide the method, organization and memory of the project. Their task is to make the actions verifiable, and not to replace the independent choice of the participant.

Area of work

Work

Border

D14 / Science

One question, a pre-described method, a primary record, and a limited output.

The result of one study is not declared a scientific discovery without appropriate verification.

D15 / Digital Environment and AI

A small directory with versions, links and verified access rights.

Personal and private data are not transferred to an external service automatically.

D16 / Economics and Finance

Plan and fact of resources of one work; disclosed assumptions of educational calculation.

Not an investment recommendation, a banking transaction, or a basis for recognition of an asset.

D17 / Social system

Coherent mutual assistance: the necessary task, the roles taken and the way of treatment.

Assistance is not conditioned by the disclosure of beliefs or someone else's personal history.

D18 / Security and Sustainability

Map of risks and stops of a particular workshop; educational analysis of the situation.

No security certificate and no right to special work.

D19 / Development Management

Decision log: subject, reason, responsible, deadline and new version.

The decision of the group does not create the powers of the authority or the right to someone else's property.

Verifying connections before scaling

When one decision is changed, it is checked who will be affected. Moving classes to a digital environment can reduce site costs, but increase device requirements and participant access. Such an effect is recorded separately; saving does not justify excluding a person without discussing an affordable alternative.

The classifier is single.

Culture is a cross-cutting practice and, for example, the content of tasks D02 or D13; a new twentieth direction is not introduced. Change of D-codes is possible only in a separate version with a correspondence table.

16 / TRAINING PROJECT A

One text, two readings

Reading workshop model: Cultural interpretation is combined with source verification. The project is described for use, and not as an already held event.

Element

Proposed entry

Selection

Main D02; communications D14, D17. Main P10; supporting P03 by choice.

Need

The participant wants to argue his reading and understand where the information about the work is taken from.

Result

Two short interpretations of one permitted text, a source card and a discussion protocol.

Boundaries

Without evaluating the beliefs of participants, recording personal stories by default and reprinting someone else's work without reason.

Resources

Available text, the time of two authors and the examiner, paper or text editor. The site is agreed separately.

Consistency

First, determine the origin of the text and the conditions for its use. Then independently prepare one reading. After the exchange, separate the matching observations and different explanations. Check the historical data from the source. Make edits, maintain differences, and prepare a resolved final version.

Three conditions of acceptance

Each reading is based on specific fragments or details; background information is traced back to the source or marked as unspecified; comments are reviewed and you can see which edits are accepted. The consent of the authors is not required.

What may not work

There are no rights to publish the source code - their own cards and a valid link are saved, not a full copy. The context is not found - the unknown remains in the card. One participant stops work - his contribution is used only within the agreed limits; the scope of the project is reviewed.

Transfer of experience

Agreed cards, source origin, discussion rules and method limitations are sent to the Archive. A foreign life experience does not turn into educational material without a separate basis.

17 / EDUCATIONAL PROJECT B

Energy of the training place

The goal is to master the difference in power, operating time and energy consumption. This is a training task with a calculation model, not an electrical installation project and not an audit of energy saving.

Passport tasks

Main D09; Communications D02, D14 and D18. The participant describes one training place, selects an available data source and presents a calculation table. Replacement of equipment, interference with the network and conclusions about health or regulatory coverage are excluded.

Learning Assumptions

Value / Calculation

Constant power of one lamp

12 W = 0,012 kW. This is an illustrative value, not a reading from an actual device.

Scenario A

2 hours per day × 5 days = 10 hours; E = 0,012 × 10 = 0,120 kWh.

Scenario B

2 hours per day × 4 days = 8 hours; E = 0,012 × 8 = 0,096 kWh.

Difference

0,120 − 0,096 = 0,024 kWh; 0,024 / 0,120 × 100 = 20%.

What the difference means

In the model, the operating time has decreased. The effectiveness of the lamp has not been improved.

The calculation uses the E-link = P × t and the definition of power and energy units. The actual mode, data source and calculation constraints are specified in the real task. [S07]

How not to get a false conclusion

Compare the cost with the completed task. If there were fewer classes in the second scenario, the lower spending alone does not confirm the improvement. Efficiency requires the determination of a useful outcome and comparable conditions; this example does not.

Acceptance

The verifier restores the translation of units and both calculations, sees the conditionality of the initial data and the explanation of the difference. When using real readings, the authorized primary source, period and journal are attached, without dangerous actions for the sake of obtaining data.

Permissible outcome

The participant correctly calculated the model and abandoned the unconfirmed claim of savings. This is the result of mastering the method; money, emission reduction, and technical effects are not attributed automatically.

18 / TRAINING PROJECT IN

Live Knowledge Catalogue

The catalog combines cultural and research cards so that another person can find the source, understand the status of the record and offer a fix.

Element

Proposed entry

Selection

Main direction D15; links to D02, D14 and D19. P06 and P05 are chosen by the participant.

Need

The materials of one workshop are difficult to find and distinguish from the old versions.

Minimum result

Eight cards on one issue, table of contents, version log and access rules. The number eight is a learning assumption.

Form

Folder with files and registry or paper file. Ready integration with EQUILIBRIUM is not expected.

Boundaries

Do not collect profiles of participants, health information and other people's private materials; do not copy the entire source without reason.

Practical assembly

Assign a single code to each card. Separate the source material from your own retelling. Record the author, date, source, verification status and right of use. Leave only what is necessary in the table of contents. Save the previous version when corrected; check that the links and access rights work for the right user.

Verification on a specific task

Before testing, agree on what exactly the user should find: for example, the basis of one statement and the latest version adopted. During the test, record obstacles, not help in silence. While the test is not carried out, the field "actual result" remains blank with the appropriate mark.

Criteria for acceptance

Each card has an origin and access mode; the selected links are checked; the outdated version is not rendered as current; the user can submit a comment. Having eight files does not in itself fulfill these requirements.

Continued

The second workshop receives the allowed template and tries it with its materials. The way of organization is transferred, not the assumption that the same structure guarantees the same benefits.

19 / MEMORY SYSTEMS

Archive, version and application AI

The archive retains not only a successful result, but also the origin, method and limitations. The available file without this information is not yet verified knowledge.

Recording

Why it is needed

Code / Version / Status

Distinguish draft, accepted and archival version; do not erase history.

Author and contribution

Indicate who prepared the material and what help they received.

Source and date

Find the source material and understand its time context.

Method and Confirmation

Check the way to the conclusion, not just read the result.

Rights and access

Determine who and in what way is entitled to use the record.

Limitations and revision

Understand where the material must not be used and whom to notify about an error.

Simple name rule

For example: FEN-PRJ-003_K04_v1.0. The project code, card number and version do not change the meaning when transferring between folders. Date, author and status stored in the card; file with suffix "final_new_2" does not replace the change log. EQUILIBRIUM here — the projected communication environment, not the statement about the current software service.

AI - Assistant, not source of authority

In the proposed order, AI can help formulate a question, simplify a text, or suggest a structure. Significant statements are checked by a person from primary sources. The contribution of the tool is noted next to the work; the answer AI is not used as the only proof. Closed materials and personal data are not uploaded automatically.

UNESCO Recommendation on Ethical Aspects AI 2021 The year includes human supervision and responsibility. It is used as a guideline; the specific order of work with the tools is approved by the operator taking into account the data and applicable requirementsS08]

Open Access and Open License are Different

In defining UNESCO’s open educational resources, the public domain or a license allowing appropriate use is important. Free reading of the page does not mean free right to process and distribute it. [S04]

20 / RELATED BALANCES

One primary record - multiple links

The associated balance shows the need, resource, action and confirmed change in directions. This is a project accounting model, not a replacement for accounting or a law document.

Four states of resource

State

Example

Required

Six hours of catalog work is required.

Verified

The performers agreed on volume and period; the same employment is not promised twice.

Used

According to the journal, specific actions were actually performed and the time was indicated.

Remaining / changed

The remainder or need to reassess the plan is fixed; the promise does not become a fact.

Example of distribution

General record R-001 contains 6 man hours. For analytics pre-agreed distribution: 4 hours refer to the preparation of training cards D02, 2 hours to organize the catalog D15. The sum of the distributed parts is equal to 6 hours. If both of these points are referenced 6 hours, these links are not re-combined.

This distribution describes the costs, but does not share the value of the contribution and does not create two independent results from one work. Money, hours, number of cards and kilowatt-hours are shown in different lines and do not add up to a single indicator without a reasonable model.

Connection with the "Designer of the ideal standard"

The vision, working requirements and facts are retained for the project. KRISTALL741 remains a proposed data structure: 3 layers × 19 areas × 13 fields = 741 positions. This is not a new mandatory reporting requirement, a physical law or confirmation of an achieved impact.

What the Guardian Checks

The record has a code, object, period, unit, source and responsible. Links lead to a primary record; distributions are checked by sum; incomplete data are marked and not turned into zero values.

21 / NOTE AND CORRIGENDUM

Consider the work, not evaluate the person

Acceptance is the decision on a specific version of the result. It is separated from the participant’s gratitude, discussion of his personality and decision on further participation.

Order of consideration

The author presents an agreed version and grounds. The examiner selects the methods provided, records compliance and comments. According to the controversial statement, the source of the disagreement is first established: the criterion, data, calculation or interpretation. Then record the decision, the responsible, the time of correction and the mode of transfer of materials.

Decision on work

Consequence

Accepted

The agreed requirements are met; restrictions remain in the card.

Needed refinement

Specific inconsistencies, support and conditions for re-examination are indicated.

Pending consideration

There are no sufficient grounds or safe conditions for a solution; a blocking issue is named.

Work completed without acceptance

The participant stopped the project or the task lost its meaning; the done and the rights to it are described without fictional success.

Right to dissent

The participant receives an understandable explanation and the opportunity to contact another authorized person. As an internal guideline, the first response period of up to five working days proposed in the “Fundamentals” is retained. This is a project procedure that does not override applicable legal rights and deadlines.

After an error is detected

The corrected version receives a new number and a description of the change. If there is a significant error, the previous publication is marked as revised; users are informed which conclusion is no longer confirmed. In case of security threat, the affected activity is stopped until the usual analysis.

Three independent solutions

Take a job; allow publication; continue personal route. One does not automatically involve the other. A person may not publish the accepted work and not start the next cycle.

22 / RUSSIAN PART

Launch preparation: issues and documents

This section specifies a list of checks for the operator. It does not establish that a specific site has the right to start activities, and does not replace the legal expertise of the actual format.

Question to be checked

Document prior to action

What exactly is being done?

Description of activities; verification of the applicable education regime, including licensing, under 273-FZ. [S09]

Who is the organizer and who is responsible?

Information about the operator, powers, responsible and grounds for using the site.

What personal data is needed?

Purpose, legal basis, necessary composition, access, timing, procedure for appeals and removal; verification of 152-FZ. [S10]

What is allowed to publish and transmit?

Separate decision on materials, personal data and rights; in international exchange - check the transfer mode. [S10, S11]

Who owns the materials?

Register of authorship and grounds of use, including processing, translation and distribution; Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. [S11]

Are there special risks?

Map of actions: children, equipment, premises, natural objects, medical and other special issues. The requirements are determined by the actual task.

Minimum Organizer Set

Regulations on the module, conditions of participation and exit, roles, site documents, security and appeal procedures, documents on data and rights, acceptance criteria, confirmed resource plan and costs if available. The forms of this volume help to describe the project, but do not replace the required contracts, consents and permissions.

Status of legal sources

S09 - the card of the initial official publication of the law; S10 - the available departmental text; S11 - the official section of Rospatent with regulatory materials. The completeness of the revisions as of the date of the specific operation, regional requirements and transitional provisions are subject to separate reconciliation.

Start condition

The name "club", "center" or "workshop" is not a legal opinion. Prior to inviting participants, the operator determines the actual content, necessary grounds and responsible.

23 / INTERNATIONAL PART

Exchange of promises, not methods

An international workshop is offered as a collaboration on a single cultural or research issue. Partnerships, financing and applicability of specific contracts are confirmed separately.

Methodological guidance

Practical application

Lifelong learning

Different ages, life contexts and forms of learning; accessible route without a single mandatory pace. [S01]

Culture and art education

Context, linguistic diversity and the relationship of cultural work to learning. [S02]

Open Science

Origin, method and responsible reuse of materials. [S03]

Open educational resources

Exchange and transfer within the public domain or the relevant license. [S04]

Model of two workshops

The parties choose one question, agree on a dictionary and the same fields of the card. Each group works in its own context. Then, only the permitted materials are exchanged, the meaning of the translation is checked, and the differences in observations are explained. The conclusions of one group are not attributed to the whole people, country or culture.

A short list of agreements

Parties and contacts; purpose and result; language and translation control; contribution and costs; authorship and permitted uses; data and access mode; applicable law and dispute resolution; acceptance and withdrawal. The signature under the sheet does not replace the mandatory form of agreement for the operation.

For the transfer of personal data and the use of protected materials, the rules of the affected jurisdictions are checked, and for the Russian side, the applicable requirements, including 152-FZ and part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The mere intention of sharing knowledge does not create an exception to these requirements. [S10, S11]

Border of international reference points

The recommendations and framework documents of UNESCO here are not a contract with FENIX, a license, a certificate or a summary of the approval of the program. The proposed exchange procedure is designed for this volume.

24 / PROGRAM CHECK

Pilot results and next cycle

The first cycle should show how the method works in these conditions. Coverage, completion, quality of work, costs and participants’ opinions are taken into account separately.

What to observe

How not to distort the recording

Participation

Started, continuing, paused and completed; cut date and condition criterion.

Works

Presented, accepted and directed to revision; one version is not considered a new project.

Mastering the action

Comparable initial and final task, type of assistance and comparison limitations.

Resources

The fact of time, materials, money and energy in individual units.

Accessibility and treatment

Difficulties, format changes, answers and corrections without publishing unnecessary personal data.

Re-application

Who used the method, in what context and with what changes.

Example of the denominator

Conditionally: started 12 man, the work was presented 10, adopted 8 One by one from the author. On the cut date, two paused, two submitted works require revision. Enrollment rate for start-ups — 8/12 = 66,7%; Among those who have — 8/10 = 80%. These numbers describe different relationships, not the proven effectiveness of the program.

When to repeat and when to reassemble

The next cycle is possible when you understand the need, the confirmed resources, the permissible load, the security and the method of verification. With systemic difficulties, materials, availability, the role of the mentor or the scope of the task are first corrected. Increasing the number of sites does not replace the elimination of causes.

Completion of the second volume

The person chose the task, received support, created the work and understood the limitations. The workshop retained a proven method, costs and errors. The next step is a conscious decision, not an obligation to constantly expand the project.

Independent performance evaluation will require a separate research protocol and comparison design. Descriptive statistics of one volunteer pilot alone do not establish the causal effect of the method.

FORM A/F-PRC-01

Personal route of one cycle

It is filled by the participant independently or with the selected support. You can use a working name or code; intimate and worldview information is not required.

1. My question

What do I want to understand or learn to do?

_____________________________________________________________________

2. My work

What small result will I present by the end of the cycle?

_____________________________________________________________________

3. My choice

Main P-circuit; associated contours and D-direction - if necessary.

_____________________________________________________________________

4. My initial attempt

Date, sample or description; available assistance and conditions.

_____________________________________________________________________

5. My sources and support

Material, mentor or partner; what else needs to be found.

_____________________________________________________________________

6. My time and conditions

Available hours, convenient format, breaks and analysis period.

_____________________________________________________________________

7. My Boundaries

What I don't do or publish; how do I report a pause or an exit.

_____________________________________________________________________

8. My test

Criterion, confirmation and a person who will help to check the work.

_____________________________________________________________________

9. Nearest action

What, when and with whose support I will do first.

_____________________________________________________________________

Date: __________________ Code / Name: __________________ Version: __________

Filling in the route does not constitute consent to its public distribution.

FORM B / F-PRC-02

Source and cultural work

One card connects one’s own work with the material, its origin and the boundaries of interpretation. The unknown is directly indicated.

Field

Recording

Code / Date / Version

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Name of object or material

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Author / origin

Author, organization or "not installed": __________________
________________________________________________

Where to find the source

Link or archive cipher; page; date of access:
________________________________________________

Substantial allegation

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Confirmed by the source

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Context / Limitations

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

My reading

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Other Possible Readings

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Check / Edit

Who checked and what was fixed: _________________________
________________________________________________

Right to use / access

License or other basis; permissible actions:
________________________________________________

For each record, distinguish: fact by source, own observation, interpretation, hypothesis and unknown. The participation of AI in the search, translation or preparation of the text is indicated separately; the information is verified by a person.

FORM B / F-PRC-03

The protocol of educational observation

First, the question, method, and conditions are agreed upon; then primary records are created. Corrections should not hide the original entry.

Question, object and period

The project code and what surveillance does not establish.

_____________________________________________________________________

Method and permissible conditions

Source or instrument; units; recording conditions; reason for stopping.

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

Comparison rule

What is compared and what differences in conditions need to be explained.

_____________________________________________________________________

Date / Code

Original entry

Conditions / omissions

Source

____________

__________________

__________________

____________

____________

__________________

__________________

____________

____________

__________________

__________________

____________

____________

__________________

__________________

____________

____________

__________________

__________________

____________

Calculation or method of analysis

Formula, source numbers, sequence; calculation file if available.

_____________________________________________________________________

Conclusion and Limitations

What is established; what is not confirmed; what other explanations are possible.

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

Reviewer and next step

Name or code, date, comment, additional verification.

_____________________________________________________________________

The absence of data is not indicated by zero. The training protocol does not replace professional opinion, expertise or technical admission.

FORM G / F-PRC-04

Passport of practical project

The unified fields M01-M13 link task, resources, and verification. If necessary, the lines are expanded or accompanied by applications.

Passport field

Recording

M01 / Identification

Name, code, version, date: ___________________________

M02 / Need

Who and what needs: _______________________________
________________________________________________

M03 / Participants

Author, mentor, operator, checker: ________________

M04 / Borders

Object, period, included / excluded: __________________

M05 / Directions

Basic D code; related D and selected P: ______________

M06 / Knowledge

Sources, method, rights, missing knowledge: _____________
________________________________________________

M07 / Results

Desired image: ____________________________________
Testable requirements: ______________________________
Fact / not yet received: ________________________________

M08 / Plan

Stages, terms, actions, responsible: __________________
________________________________________________

M09 / Resources

Need, Confirmation, Units, Limit: ____________
________________________________________________

M10 / Finance

Sources, costs, bases, responsible: ___________

M11 / Law and Security

Grounds, risks, stop conditions, access: __________________
________________________________________________

M12 / Data and evidence

Method, records, criteria, storage locations: _________________
________________________________________________

M13 / Acceptance and continuation

Who, when and by what rule checks: ________________
Decision and date of revision: ____________________________

Author: __________________ Date: __________ Viewed before: __________

A review mark is an internal solution to a project, not a replacement for required permits.

FORM D / F-PRC-05

Journal of Resources and Links

Project, period and responsible

Passport version; single source of primary record.

_____________________________________________________________________

Code / resource

Ed.

Needed

Subtv.

Actual data

Balance

________________

______

______

______

______

______

________________

______

______

______

______

______

________________

______

______

______

______

______

________________

______

______

______

______

______

________________

______

______

______

______

______

________________

______

______

______

______

______

"Subtv." is a confirmed available volume, not a verbal promise. The balance is calculated only for comparable values for one period. Time in man-hours, energy in kW·h, money in rubles and the number of materials recorded in different lines.

Basis and distribution

Resource Code

Document / Source

Relationships and distribution

____________

________________________

________________________

____________

________________________

________________________

____________

________________________

________________________

____________

________________________

________________________

One resource is counted once. Links or shares of its distribution are fixed in related directions, but not the reappearance of the same volume.

Deviation and cause

What has changed regarding the plan; what actions have not yet been secured.

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

Decision

Who and when confirms the transfer, reduction or additional resource.

_____________________________________________________________________

The form is designed to manage the project; it does not replace accounting registers and does not establish ownership of the resource.

FORM E / F-PRC-06 / LIST 1 OF 2

Benefits and feasibility

Project / Version: __________________________ Date: __________________

Stage: before start / intermediate analysis / acceptance. Before the result is available, the readiness of the confirmation method is checked; the result itself is not marked as already received.

Code

Verification

Status

Proof / who

Q01

The need is confirmed by the participant or the owner of the task.

________
________

____________
____________

Q02

A person can choose a route, pause and exit.

________
________

____________
____________

Q03

The boundaries of the object, period, and group are clearly described.

________
________

____________
____________

Q04

The initial state is separated from the desired result.

________
________

____________
____________

Q05

The criteria are clear to the user and the examiner.

________
________

____________
____________

Q06

The necessary knowledge, method and mentor are available.

________
________

____________
____________

Q07

Resources are confirmed; there is no double promise of one resource.

________
________

____________
____________

Q08

Time and load agreed with the performers.

________
________

____________
____________

Q09

The financial plan has a basis and is responsible.

________
________

____________
____________

Q10

Roles, powers and dependencies are defined.

________
________

____________
____________

Statuses: "confirmed"; "required improvement"; "Not applicable - with an explanation." Explanation and reference to document or observation are mandatory for the decision.

Necessary corrections

What, who and by what date specifies what support is needed.

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

Checker: __________________ Next parsing: __________________

Checks do not add up to the overall score of the person or project.

FORM E / F-PRC-06 / LIST 2 OF 2

Safety and evidence

Project / Version: __________________________ Date: __________________

Extension of sheet Q01 to Q10. The reason is given for each inapplicable item; lack of proof does not mean confirmation.

Code

Verification

Status

Proof / who

Q11

Legal grounds and mandatory requirements are identified.

________
________

____________
____________

Q12

Risks, stop conditions and response procedures have been identified.

________
________

____________
____________

Q13

The availability and absence of coercion are taken into account.

________
________

____________
____________

Q14

Rights to materials and data regime are established.

________
________

____________
____________

Q15

Side effects in related directions have been tested.

________
________

____________
____________

Q16

For the criterion, units, method and decision rule are specified.

________
________

____________
____________

Q17

Periods and conditions are comparable or differences are explained.

________
________

____________
____________

Q18

Data, calculations and restrictions are available to the verifier.

________
________

____________
____________

Q19

The result is not only verified by its author.

________
________

____________
____________

Q20

The version, revision period and correction channel are assigned.

________
________

____________
____________

Statuses: "confirmed"; "required improvement"; "Not applicable - with an explanation." Unremoved critical condition stops the corresponding action regardless of the other marks.

Termination and renewal conditions

Action, cause, responsible, confirmation of risk elimination.

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

Checker: __________________ Next parsing: __________________

The verification history and previous versions are saved with the established access mode.

FORM F-PRC-07

Acceptance and revision

Some work is being done on the agreed requirements. The decision does not establish the value of the person and does not oblige him to continue participation.

Field

Recording

Project / Version / Date

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Author and Examiner

Names or codes; possible conflict of interest:
________________________________________________

Subject of acceptance

Work, composition, boundaries and declared result:
________________________________________________

Criteria and version

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Evidence

Files, primary records, protocol Q01-Q20:
________________________________________________

Confirmed / Unknown

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Decision

Accepted / finalized / suspended / closed without acceptance:
________________________________________________

Corrections and support

What, who, by what date; assistance provided:
________________________________________________

Publication and rights

Separate solution, bases, scope and access mode:
________________________________________________

Objection and consideration

Contact, order, other checker if necessary:
________________________________________________

Selecting the next step

Continue / change / pause / complete; participant's decision:
________________________________________________

Author read: ______________ Checker: ______________ Date: __________

Acceptance is not equal to permission to publish. Corrections are issued with a new version; the source of the comment and the reason for the change remain.

FORM WITH / F-PRC-08

Experience Card for Archive

The mode of action is retained along with the conditions of repetition, result, and limitations. Before posting, the composition of information and access rights are checked.

Field

Recording

Code / Title / Version

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Project and communications

Main D-code, related directions, original passport:
________________________________________________

Authorship and contribution

Author, participants, mentor; help AI if available:
________________________________________________

Task and context

For whom, where and under what conditions the work is done:
________________________________________________

Work and method

What is done; sequence; result criterion:
________________________________________________

Sources and primary data

Links, archive ciphers, files; availability for verification:
________________________________________________

Errors and Limitations

What did not work or remained unverified:
________________________________________________

Rights and access

Reasons for storage, use and distribution:
________________________________________________

Conditions of repetition

Knowledge, resources, assistance, permissible conditions and limitations:
________________________________________________

Storage and revision

Term, reason, responsible; removal or depersonalization:
________________________________________________

Corrections and Contact

How to report an error; who updates the card:
________________________________________________

Guardian: ______________ Date: __________ Card Status: ______________

Excess personal information is not included in the card. The form does not replace the required legal grounds for data processing and use of materials.

SOURCES / S01-S06

Methodology and research

Date accessed: 17 September 2026. Sources set separate methodological guidelines, but do not confirm the effectiveness of FENIX. Scripts, formulas and examples of the volume are project solutions.

S01 / UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning

"Lifelong learning". Training covers different ages, contexts and forms. It is used to build a voluntary route, not a single standard of life development.

Open Source

S02 / Culture and art education

UNESCO. "UNESCO Member States adopt global framework to strengthen culture and arts education", 15.02.2024. Official announcement of the framework programme; source of links between cultural practices and education.

Open Source

S03 / Open Science Recommendation

UNESCO, 23.11.2021. Methodical support for transparency of origin, methods and responsible reuse of materials. Does not remove access restrictions and rights of third parties.

Open Source

S04 / Open educational resources

UNESCO. Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER), 2019. Public domain and open licenses differ with simple free read access.

Open Source

S05 / Study of reproduction of studied

Karpicke J. D., Blunt J. R. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science. 2011;331(6018):772–775. DOI: 10.1126/science.1199327. The conclusions relate to the conditions of the described experiments.

Open Source

S06 / Methodological commentary

Mintzes J. J. et al. Comment on “Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping”. Science. 2011;334(6055):453. DOI: 10.1126/science.1203698. Considered as a published critique of comparison methods in S05.

Open Source

Training methodology, research publication and independent evaluation of the program are different types of grounds. Tom is not replacing one with another.

SOURCES / S07-S11

Units, law and continuity

S07 / Units of energy and power

NIST, reference article on energy; BIPM, section units. Joule is a unit of energy; watt is a joule per second. Calculations on page 20 are made for conditional input data.

Open Source · Units BIPM

S08 / Ethics of artificial intelligence

UNESCO. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, 2021. International methodological guide: human participation, responsibility and consideration of technology limitations.

Open Source

S09 / Education in the Russian Federation

Federal law of 29.12.2012 № 273-FZ. Original official publication card. The current version and the actual legal regime of activity are checked for launch.

Open Source

S10 / Personal data

Federal law of 27.07.2006 № 152-FZ; text on the website of the Ministry of Labor of Russia. Used for legal navigation; not stated as a complete current revision on the date of all future transactions.

Open Source

S11 / Intellectual rights

Rospatent, the section of regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation, including part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The applicable editions, exceptions and grounds of specific use are checked separately.

Open Source

Internal base of the series

Source document: "FENIX — Basics", FEN-BAS-001, Version 1.0. It is preserved from P01–P13, D01–D19, M01–M13, Q01–Q20 and five stages. Related modules: "Knowledge and energy", "Designer of an ideal standard", "Basics of self-development. Culture and Science.

Illustrative posters do not replace the classifier of the source Word document. The new links and practices in this volume do not change the numbering of directions.

FENIX • VOLUME II • FROM PERSONAL CHOICE TO SHARED ENDEAVOUR

Published files

Practice and Mentoring · Full Published Text

FENIX — Volume II. The Practice of Self-Development. Presentation

Source status: Author's working concept 1.0; document for discussion and approval

A slide-based path from personal choice to shared endeavour: choose a question, produce work, verify the result and preserve experience. It distinguishes the finished product, the acquired skill and the achieved effect, and shows the roles of the mentor and workshop and how the second volume relates to Foundations.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/library/fenix-practice-volume-two-presentation.html

Open on the site

Slide 1

PROGRAM OF PEOPLE'S SELF-DEVELOPMENT

FENIX

EVOLUTION SYSTEM

Volume II

PRACTICE

SELF-DEVELOPMENT

From personal choice

to shared endeavour

Select a question.

Create a job.

Verify the result.

Passing on experience.

Working concept 1.0

17 September 2026

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

CULTURE AND SCIENCE

Slide 2

CONTINUITY

From “Basics” to Observed Practice

The second volume translates the principles of the system into the actions of the participant and the workshop.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, Passport, p. 2; "Fundamentals"

02

01 / BASIC

Volume I ·

Principles, voluntary choice, common language and system codes.

02 / ACTION

Volume II · Practice

Route, mentor, own work and verifiable result.

03 / MEMORY

Next cycle

Comments, corrected version, Archive and mode transfer.

Methodical model for adults. The site, timing, roles and conditions are agreed separately.

Slide 3

RESULT

Create a work ≠ master a skill ≠ achieve an impact

Three levels of results are recorded separately.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 01, p. 4

03

LEVEL 1

Work created

There is a certain text, card, calculation or sample.

Confirmation: file or object.

LEVEL 2

Method mastered

The participant explains the method and performs a similar task.

Confirmation: Action.

LEVEL 3

The result is applied

The user used the work in these conditions.

Confirmation: Application.

Training can be completed without a statement of proven social impact.

Slide 4

FIVE STAGES FENIX

One cycle: from question to transfer of experience

Symbolic names refer to the stages of work, not the stages of human value.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 08, p. 11

04

1

Iskra

Selection

The question, the boundaries,

Initial Attempt

2

Flame

Practice

Source, method,

own work

3

Ashes

Dismantling

Errors, limitations,

corrected version

4

Ascension

Verification

Criteria, evidence,

decision on work

5

Flight

Transmission

Archive, repetition,

new question

The transition is determined by the readiness of work. The calendar date does not mean automatic acceptance.

Slide 5

FIRST TALK

40 minutes to select a feasible task

The purpose of the meeting is one job and the necessary support, and not the collection of a complete biography.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 02, p. 5

05

TIME

SUBJECT

QUESTION

0–8 min

Selection

What do you want to understand or learn to do?

8–16 min

Result

What little work can be shown?

16–24 min

Initial attempt

What happens with the help available?

24–32 min

Terms

How much is increased and what is excluded?

32–40 min

Agreement

What is the next step, who will help and when analysis?

Result: Form A, one selected result and a clear way to request help.

Slide 6

FORM A/F-PRC-01

Personal itinerary: eight short recordings

The participant fills out the form himself or with the support chosen by him.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, Form A, p. 28

06

01

My question

02

Work to be undertaken

03

Selected P- and D-codes

04

Initial attempt

05

Sources and support

06

Time and convenient format

07

Boundaries and the right to pause

08

Criterion and method of verification

The next step is filled in - not a mandatory program of a lifetime.

Slide 7

P01-P07 / PERSONAL CONTOURS

13 areas: choice, not stairs

One practice can connect several areas. It is not necessary to go through everything.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 03, p. 6

07

RCD

AREA

PRACTICAL ENTRANCE

P01

Health

Available load, breaks, conditions of participation.

P02

Consciousness

Conscious choice of the task and the right to change the solution.

P03

Mind

Distinguishing information, conclusions and assumptions.

P04

Emotions

A convenient way to report a problem.

P05

Skills

One repeatable and safe action.

P06

Education

A small route of sources and tasks.

P07

Work and skill

Reference → comment → correction.

Personal beliefs and internal experiences do not become mandatory data of the project.

Slide 8

P08-P13 / PERSONAL CONTOURS

Skills are related to the context of life

The area is chosen for its own task, not for an external requirement.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 03, p. 6

08

RCD

AREA

PRACTICAL ENTRANCE

P08

Economics and financial independence

Plan and fact of time and expenditure.

P09

Family and communities

Agreed task and voluntary contribution.

P10

Creativity and culture

Text, sketch or card with authorship and context.

P11

Nature and Service to the Earth

Allowed surveillance and withdrawal limits.

P12

Spirituality

Personal values; content can not be fixed.

P13

Meaning and mission of life

Immediate action and the right to review the plan.

Several connections of one work do not turn into several independent achievements.

Slide 9

CULTURE

Four layers of cultural work

The object, work, language or craft is considered together with their origin.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, chap. 04, p. 7 · S02

09

1

Observable

What you can see, you can hear.

or read?

2

Origin

Who is the author, when created,

Where does the material come from?

3

Context

What information about time

Is the place confirmed?

4

Interpretation

How I understand work

How do you support the conclusion?

Result: author's card, source and conditions of use; different readings are saved.

Slide 10

SCIENCE

The exit path should be visible.

Training practice shows the method, but does not replace professional expertise.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, chap. 05, p. 8 · S03

10

01

Question

Object, period,

excluded conclusions

→

02

Method

What is fixed,

Who and in what units

→

03

Recording

Source, date,

Testimonials and omissions

→

04

Verification

Origin of number

and repeated calculation

→

05

Conclusion

What is confirmed

and what else is unknown

No data ≠ zero value. One training record ≠ Conclusion about the whole environment or population.

Slide 11

CLASS / EXAMPLE

60 minutes: from question to work

Each meeting ends with one testable fragment of the result.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 06, p. 9

11

MINUTES

STAGE

ACTION

0–5

Task

Name the meeting result

5–15

Study

Disassemble a small source or sample

15–20

My own attempt

Explain without text; don't make up omissions

20–25

Sverka

Find omissions and unconfirmed claims

25–30

Interruption

Pause in agreed format

30–50

Application

Perform a card, calculation or part of the instruction

50–60

Dismantling

One necessary change and the next step

Pages viewed and connection times are working conditions, not proof of skill.

Slide 12

TEACHING

Feedback is related to work

Authorship and the decision on the route remain with the participant.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 07, p. 10

12

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION

VERIFIED COMMENT

"You are inattentive."

There is no date in the two records. Let’s add it to compare periods.”

"Make it beautiful"

"The reader needs to find the source. Let’s put the link next to the statement.”

"We have to try"

"The volume does not fit in time. We'll choose one card instead of four."

"I understood the text differently."

"Show the details on which your reading is based."

Meeting record: version → remark → participant action → help → date of next parsing.

Slide 13

WEEKLY ROUTE / PART 1

Weeks 1–6: choose, explore, try

The model of one cycle is 12 weeks and 36 hours of participant; the rate is consistent separately.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 08, p. 11

13

WEEK

STAGE

WORK

EXIT

1

Iskra

Question, conditions, initial attempt

Personal route

2

Iskra

User, Borders, Security

Passport and decision to start

3

Flame

Cultural context and reading

Cultural card

4

Flame

Verification of significant allegations

Source card

5

Flame

Method and trial recording

The Black Protocol

6

Flame

Independent work and clarification

Intermediate sample

Example of the week: 1 Time of meeting + 1 Hour of Study + 1 time of practice. Breaks and load adapt.

Slide 14

WEEKLY ROUTE / PART 2

Weeks 7–12: check, fix, pass

The transition to the next stage depends on the readiness of the work, and not only on the time.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 08, p. 11

14

WEEK

STAGE

WORK

EXIT

7

Flame → Ashes

Practice and actual costs

Work and primary records

8

Ashes

Verification of data and changed conditions

List of restrictions

9

Ashes

Feedback and Hypothesis Analysis

List of specific edits

10

Ashes

Correction and collection of the presented version

Acceptance version

11

Ascension

Verification of requirements and method

Acceptance protocol

12

Flight

Archive, broadcast, next choice

Experience card and solution

Continue, reduce the volume, pause or complete the route - a separate choice of the person.

Slide 15

WORKSHOP

Six roles - clear responsibility

It is a workspace agreed upon, not necessarily a new organization or building.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 09, p. 12

15

Participant

Selection of task and own work

Mentor

Method, sources and feedback

Task Owner

Need and conditions of use

Controller

Platform, grounds and security

Reviewer

Criteria and reasoned decision

The Guardian

Versions, origin and access

Minimum: place, permitted materials, recording method, contact of the organizer and stopping conditions.

Slide 16

PASSPORT / M01-M07

First, the need and the testable result

The first seven fields explain who needs work, within what boundaries and on what basis.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, chap. 10, p. 13; form G, p. 31

16

Fields

CONTENTS

M01 / Identification

Code, name, version, date and status.

M02 / Need

Who needs the result and how the need is confirmed.

M03 / Participants

Author, mentor, operator, user, checker.

M04 / Borders

Object, audience, period and excluded actions.

M05 / Directions

Basic D-code, communications, and selected P-areas.

M06 / Knowledge

Sources, method, necessary skills and rights.

M07 / Results

Perfect image / work requirements / actual work.

Until the result is obtained, the "fact" field contains "not yet obtained" rather than the desired effect.

Slide 17

PASSPORT / M08-M13

Then - resources, bases and acceptance

The passport links the plan to what is really available and can be verified.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, chap. 10, p. 13; form G, p. 31

17

Fields

CONTENTS

M08 / Plan

Steps, dates and points of volume change.

M09 / Resources

Time, materials, room, energy and availability.

M10 / Finance

Costs, source, responsible and confirmation.

M11 / Law and Security

Grounds, risks, availability and stopping conditions.

M12 / Data and evidence

Primary records, files, checks and restrictions.

M13 / Acceptance and continuation

Verifier, decision rule, comments and version.

The details of the passport depend on the scale and risk; the internal form does not replace the necessary permits.

Slide 18

STATEMENTS AND EVIDENCE

The criterion is consistent with the main work

The desired property, method of verification and decision rule are written together.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 11, p. 14

18

CRITERIA

HOW TO CHECK

The source is traced

For a substantial statement, there is a source or a mark "not established".

The method is clear

The other person reproduces the selected calculation from the primary record.

Work is suitable for the user

The user performs the agreed task without the hidden help of the author.

Transfer is allowed

For the included materials, the basis of use and access mode are named.

Criteria evaluate a certain work. They do not establish a person’s dignity or worth.

Slide 19

FORM E / Q01-Q20

20 checks — four groups of questions

Checks do not add up to the overall score of the person or project.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, chap. 11, p. 14; form E, p. 33–34

19

Q01–Q05

Benefits and boundaries

Need · choice · object

Initial state · result

Q06–Q10

Feasibility

Knowledge · resources · plan

Responsibility · Financing

Q11–Q15

Security and rights

Bases · risks · availability

Data and authorship · consequences

Q16–Q20

Evidence and revision

Method · comparability · data

External inspection · new version

Unremoved critical condition stops the step - the remaining marks do not compensate for it.

Slide 20

CATALOGUE OF PRACTICE / D01-D04

People, knowledge and the natural environment

Saved all 19 directions and numbering of the source Word document.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 13, p. 16

20

DIRECTION

STUDY WORK

BORDER OF APPLICATION

D01 / People and Health

Map of the conditions of participation and ways to request help.

Description of the environment, not a diagnosis.

D02 / Education and knowledge

One question is three sources and its explanation.

No promise of qualification.

D03 / Natural climate

Comparison of weather data for the same periods.

A short series is not a conclusion about the global climate.

D04 / Land and soil

History of permitted site and sources.

Without a conclusion about fertility.

One project, one basic D-code. Culture remains a cross-cutting practice, not a new 20 direction.

Slide 21

CATALOGUE OF PRACTICE / D05-D08

Water, air and living environment

Saved all 19 directions and numbering of the source Word document.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 13–14, p. 16–17

21

DIRECTION

STUDY WORK

BORDER OF APPLICATION

D05 / Water

Journal of available water consumption indications.

Appearance is not a test of drinking water.

D06 / Air

Conditions of premises and origin of data.

Not a sanitary report.

D07 / Biocenoses

Dated catalogue of species observations.

No interference with the habitat.

D08 / Food

Product cultural card and loss records.

Without the appointment of a diet and dangerous experiments.

One project, one basic D-code. Culture remains a cross-cutting practice, not a new 20 direction.

Slide 22

CATALOGUE OF PRACTICE / D09-D12

Energy, materials and technology

Saved all 19 directions and numbering of the source Word document.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 14, p. 17

22

DIRECTION

STUDY WORK

BORDER OF APPLICATION

D09 / Energy

Calculation of energy consumption with this method.

Without installation and interference with the network.

D10 / Materials

Properties of ceramics and synthetic crystals by sources.

The name of the material does not prove the properties of the sample.

D11 / Industry

Map of a simple product.

Without disclosure of protected information.

D12 / Transport

Map of the available route by open data.

No interference with the movement.

One project, one basic D-code. Culture remains a cross-cutting practice, not a new 20 direction.

Slide 23

CATALOGUE OF PRACTICE / D13-D16

Place of life, science, data and resources

Saved all 19 directions and numbering of the source Word document.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 14–15, p. 17–18

23

DIRECTION

STUDY WORK

BORDER OF APPLICATION

D13 / Cities and settlements

Cultural route of the place: points and accessibility.

The sketch does not permit construction.

D14 / Science

Question, method, primary record, limited output.

Do not declare the learning result as an opening.

D15 / Digital Environment and AI

Catalogue with versions, links and access.

No downloading of private and personal data.

D16 / Economics and Finance

Plan and fact of resources of one work.

Not a bank transaction or asset recognition.

One project, one basic D-code. Culture remains a cross-cutting practice, not a new 20 direction.

Slide 24

CATALOGUE OF PRACTICE / D17-D19

Mutual Assistance, Security and Solutions

Saved all 19 directions and numbering of the source Word document.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 15, p. 18

24

DIRECTION

STUDY WORK

BORDER OF APPLICATION

D17 / Social system

Concerted mutual assistance and accepted roles.

Help does not require the disclosure of beliefs.

D18 / Security and Sustainability

Risk map and workshop stops.

Not a certificate and not access to special works.

D19 / Development Management

Journal of decisions: grounds, term, responsible person.

The decision of the group does not create power.

One project, one basic D-code. Culture remains a cross-cutting practice, not a new 20 direction.

Slide 25

TRAINING PROJECT A

One text, two readings

D02 · Education and Knowledge; links to D14 · Science, D17 · Social System.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 16, p. 19

25

RESULT

Two Readings

Two author's cards, a common source and a discussion protocol.

SEQUENCE

Independently → together

First my explanation. Then compare observations, context, and arguments.

NOTES

Reliance on material

The details of the text, the origin of the information and the comments considered are visible.

Consent to someone else’s interpretation is not required. A stranger’s story doesn’t automatically become material.

Slide 26

TRAINING PROJECT B

Energy of the training place

Illustrative model: power 12 W = 0,012 kW; for constant power, E = P × t.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, chap. 17, p. 20 · S07

26

Scenery A

10 hours

0,012 × 10 = 0,120 kWh

Scenery B

8 hours

0,012 × 8 = 0,096 kWh

Difference: 0,024 kWh / 20%

The reason for the model is less work time.

Less consumption alone does not prove efficiency gains. All initial numbers are educational.

Slide 27

TRAINING PROJECT IN

Live Knowledge Catalogue

D15 · Digital Environment and AI; links to D02, D14 and D19.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 18, p. 21

27

8

Cards

on one issue

Training minimum

for discussion

Code and Version

Definitely find the right material

Author and source

Trace the origin of the claim

Status and access

Distinguish draft from accepted version

Observation and corrigendum

Report an error and see a new entry

Verification: another person finds the source and current version without the author’s hidden clue.

Slide 28

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

Resources are recorded in their units

The promise of help, confirmed availability, and actual expense are different records.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 12, p. 15

28

Knowledge

Source, method and assistance

Time

Hours, breaks and load

General work

Contribution and man hours

Materials

Quantity, access and return

Money

Costs and confirmations

Physical energy

Object, period and kW·h

Attention is not measured in watts. The help clock does not automatically become money or assets.

Slide 29

RELATED BALANCES

One primary record - multiple links

Project Accounting Model: Need → Confirmation → Fact → Balance or Revision.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 20, p. 23

29

R-001

6

man hours

D02 / Cards

4 h

Training materials

D15 / Catalogue

2 h

Organization of records

Verification of distribution: 4 + 2 = 6, not 6 + 6.

Clocks, rubles, cards and kW·h do not add up to one result without a separately substantiated model.

Slide 30

ARCHIVE AND EQUILIBRIUM

Work continues with its origin.

EQUILIBRIUM here is the projected communication environment; ready integration is not expected.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 19–20, p. 22–23

30

FEN-PRJ-003_K04_v1.0

Origin

Author, contribution, source, date

Verification

Method, records, restrictions

Use

Rights, access, conditions of repetition

Revision

Contact, comment, new version

KRISTALL741

3 × 19 × 13

Image / Requirements / Fact

× directions

× Passport fields

741 is a proposed data structure, not a requirement to fill everything for each task.

Slide 31

AI AND RESPONSIBILITY

Tool helps - a person checks

The proposed procedure for working with AI does not replace the original source and approval of access.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, chap. 19, p. 22 · S04, S08

31

Affordable Assistance

Structure

Formulate the question, divide the task into steps, simplify the draft.

MANDATORY

Verification

Find the original source, verify the essential information and mark the contribution of AI.

BORDERS

Data and Rights

Do not transmit private information automatically. Check the reason for use.

Free reading of the material does not mean permission to freely process and distribute it.

Slide 32

NOTES

The decision relates to a specific version

Criteria, evidence, comments and conditions for reconsideration are recorded.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 21, p. 24

32

Accepted

The requirements are met; restrictions remain.

Needed refinement

There are specific comments and conditions for re-verification.

Suspended

It’s a question that blocks the solution.

Completed without acceptance

What is done and the rights are described without fictitious success.

Three separate decisions: take the job / allow publication / continue the personal route.

Slide 33

EIGHT FORMS OF TOM

Common language of participant and workshop

The forms on the slides are a review. The completed versions are in the Word document of Volume II.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, Forms of AZ, p. 28–36

33

A / 01

Personal route

Used / 02

Source and cultural work

In / 03

Monitoring protocol

G / 04

Project passport · 13 fields

D / 05

Resources and communications

E / 06

Readiness and result · 20 checks

W / 07

Acceptance and revision

From / 08

Experience Card for Archive

All forms are linked by project code and version. Changes do not erase the history of the decision.

Slide 34

RUSSIAN PART / TRAINING

Before launch — check the actual format

List of questions for the operator; not a conclusion about the readiness of a particular site.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, chap. 22, p. 25 · S09–S11

34

CHECK

WHAT TO PREPARE

Activity and organizer

Description of the format, authority, responsibility and conditions of participation.

Training / 273-FZ [S09]

Determination of applicable regime; verification of licensing issue.

Personal data / 152-FZ [S10]

Purpose, basis, composition, access, storage time and order of appeals.

Materials / Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [S11]

Authorship, permitted uses, publication and translation.

Site and special risks

Grounds of use, availability, restrictions and order of stop.

Links are legal navigation. The applicable revisions and requirements are checked before a specific action is taken.

Slide 35

INTERNATIONAL PART

Two Workshops, One Agreed Question

Exchange the permitted materials and method; the context of each group is preserved.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, chap. 23, p. 26 · S01–S04, S10–S11

35

Workshop A

its context

Their observations

Permitted card

Workshop B

its context

Their observations

Verified translation

GENERAL QUESTION

Dictionary

Method

Terms of exchange

Reference points: lifelong learning · culture · open science · open educational resources.

International benchmarks do not mean partnership, license, certificate or program approval.

Slide 36

PILOT RESULTS / TRAINING EXAMPLE

One numerator - different denominators

Shares describe different relationships. They alone do not prove the effectiveness of the method.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 24, p. 27

36

12

Home

10

Presented Work

8

Works accepted

8 / 12 = 66,7%

Among the beginners

8 / 10 = 80%

Among those who have worked

All numbers are conditional. The actual report indicates the cut-off date, status determinations, and limitations.

Slide 37

PROGRAM VERIFICATION

Six different questions for the first cycle

Coverage, quality, costs and participants’ opinions are not combined into one indicator.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, chap. 24, p. 27

37

Participation

Who started, continued, paused, or completed?

Works

What is presented, accepted and requires revision?

Method of action

What has changed in the comparable initial and final task?

Resources

What are the real hours, materials, money and energy?

Availability

What were the difficulties, treatment and changes in the format?

Repetition

Who has applied the method in a different context and what has changed?

First, correct the identified limitations - then decide whether to repeat the cycle and expand the sites.

Slide 38

PREPARATION OF THE FIRST MASTER

Five agreements before the cycle

A small confirmed step is preferable to a large unprepared plan.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, Ch. 02, 09–11, 22, 24

38

1

Question

One hard work and its user.

2

Support

Mentor, accessible format and right to pause.

3

Grounds

Organizer, platform, data, rights, security.

4

Resources

Confirmed time, materials and costs.

5

Verification

Criterion, evidence of the result and date of the analysis.

The result of training: personal route + passport of the project + known conditions of the first action.

Slide 39

SOURCES AND NAVIGATION

Foundation - Volume II; External Sources - Guides

The S codes are preserved from the volume's bibliography. The source headers below are opened by pressing.

FENIX / Volume II

Volume II, Sources, p. 37–38

39

S01 Lifelong learning

UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning

S02 Culture and art education · 2024

UNESCO

S03 Recommendation on Open Science · 2021

UNESCO

S04 Open educational resources · 2019

UNESCO

S07 Joule and power units

NIST

S08 Ethical aspects AI · 2021

UNESCO

S09 Federal Law No 273-FZ · Education

Official publication · 30.12.2012

S10 Federal Law No 152-FZ · Data

Ministry of Labor of Russia · departmental text

S11 RF Civil Code, Part IV · Intellectual Rights

Rospatent · regulatory materials

Methods, timing, forms and training examples - Tom II's design decisions.

Sources and explanations are also included in the Rapporteur's notes. The relevance of legal requirements is a separate test.

Slide 40

NEXT CYCLE

Question → Work → Test → Transfer Experience

The practical result is a mastered mode of action and honestly described limitations.

FENIX / Volume II

Vol. II, Ch. 24, p. 27; forms A-Z

40

One selected result.

understandable conditions.

Verified work.

Saved experience.

PERSONAL CHOICE IS RESERVED

Continue / change the task / pause / complete - the decision is left to the participant.

Published files

Knowledge, energy and territorial pilot · Full published text

Knowledge and Energy — Applied Module ZE-01. Document

Source status: Concomitant ZE-01 module concept; pilot proposal, unapproved masterplan

A related New Order document connecting the Archive, science, computing, energy and measurable results. It proposes preparing a limited ZE-01 pilot, Safari Park — City of Knowledge: one engineering node, learning programmes and verification of benefits. Building a city or a large data centre is explicitly outside the first pilot’s scope.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/library/knowledge-energy-ze01-document.html

Open on the site

WHITE DEVELOPMENT BOOK / APPLICATION MODULE

NEW
WORLD CONTRIBUTION

KNOWLEDGE AND ENERGY

Archive → science → computing → energy → useful result

Conceptual illustration. Not a master plan or a description of the constructed objects.

Knowledge gives direction.
Energy provides action.

A model of coordinated human development, natural environment and technological infrastructure. From the pilot of Safari Park - City of Knowledge to the network of territories that exchange proven solutions.

The archive has grounds. The Academy creates competences. GRID checks the scripts. Energy provides the job. The multi-dimensional profile shows the result.

Prepared for Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

5 September 2026 | Version 1.0 | ZE-Module01

01 / SOLUTION IN ONE LEAVE

Two resources, one development cycle

It is proposed to develop “Knowledge and Energy” as an applied module of EQUILIBRIUM: to provide every socially useful task with verified knowledge, a competent person to carry it out, a measurable resource and responsibility for the result. The module complements, rather than replaces, the previously prepared documents on the New Order and the City of Knowledge. [П1–П3]

What we connect

What we get

Archive, research, education

Reusable materials, reproducible methods and trained participants.

Power supply, accounting, load management

Reasonable consumption profile and choice of supply options without loss of service quality.

GRID, registers, accounting group

Comparable scenarios, related balances and traceable decision dossiers.

City of Knowledge and Multidimensional Ratings

Testing benefits for humans, territory, and nature, not just increases in costs or power.

Proposed first decision

Approve a 90-day preparation phase for the ZE-01 pilot within NMU-P001 “Safari Park — City of Knowledge”. Appoint the owners of the knowledge, engineering node and methodology; agree on access to materials and measurements; determine the budget and scope of work after the survey. Construction of a new city, power plant or large data centre is not included in the initial decision.

Navigation

Pages

Paradigm Change and Architecture

3–4

Archive, Academy and Computing GRID

5–7

Energy, Contract Model and Balances

8–12

Multivariate Ratings and Calculation Example

13–16

Pilot, responsibility and road map

17–21

Data, draft decision and sources

22–24

There are no pilot results. Goals for 90 days - proposals for approval. Calculating examples are not site valuation, promise of savings, or an investment proposition.

02 / PARADIGM SHIFT

From Accumulation of Resources to Useful Outcome

In the proposed model, value is not created by the number of documents, calculations or kilowatt-hours worked. Significant result: mastered competence, working technology, preserved natural environment, reliable service and the ability to repeat a successful solution.

Previous management habits

Proposed conversion

Document as completion of work

The document as a verifiable basis for the next action.

Power as the main indicator of development

Reliability and quality of the required service at reasonable costs.

Individual digital and energy projects

Joint calculation of data, calculations, energy, water, personnel and life cycle.

Unified rating of winners

Multidimensional profile of the result, limitations and quality of evidence.

Why Knowledge and Energy are Practical

In Review IEA from 16 April 2026 Global electricity consumption by data centers is estimated at 485 TWT·h for 2025 year; central projection of 2030 A year or so 950 TWT·h. This is the entire data center sector, not just AI. The forecast is not a fact of the future and does not determine the load of our pilot1]

Conclusion for the project: the computing infrastructure should follow the confirmed tasks. The scope of service, the quality of the solution and physical consumption must be considered together; the increase in the number of calculations does not in itself prove public benefit.

Two meanings of the word "energy"

In an engineering circuit, energy is measured in physical units, and power describes the rate of its transmission or use. In the cultural language, “energy of creation” can mean motivation and initiative. These values are not mixed in balance sheets, contracts and scientific evidence.

The project formula is managerial, not physical: proven knowledge + secured action + independent verification → useful and reproducible result.

03 / ARCHITECTURE

Two Lines and Shared Responsibility

The contour of knowledge answers the questions "what is known, what can be checked and how to act." The energy circuit answers the questions "what service is needed, what and when it is provided." They converge in the project dossier and diverge after execution into measurements, results, and new knowledge.

Element

Role in the ZE-01 module

Withdrawal

Heritage Preservation Archive

Acceptance of originals, versions, rights, safety and communications.

Available to restore the file.

Academy and scientific partners

Research, training, examination of applicability.

Protocol, program, competence.

Computational Grid

Calculation of solved tasks and options.

Playable scenario.

Energy Operator

Accounting, supply and operational reliability.

Load profile and event log.

The Accounting Group

Reconciliation of units, boundaries, resources and commitments.

Balances agreed B01 to B19.

IAC / ORION22:22

Description of objects, analysis of consequences and profiles.

Justification of the decision with restrictions.

SFERA / ECO-PPA

Participants, initiatives and treaty obligations.

Cooperation program and contracts.

Execution operator / SPECZASHCHITA

Organization of coordinated work and acceptance.

Accepted result and report.

End-to-end solution recording

Need → object of knowledge → technical requirement → options → selected action → resource and contract → acceptance → Measurement → Archive. Each link receives an ID, version, source and responsible. Updating raw data causes revision of related calculations.

Platform names denote the proposed functions within the project. They do not certify state powers, consent of organizations to participate or already established legal structures.

04 / HERITAGE ARCHIVE

A memory that brings knowledge back to work

The archive is proposed to be an active infrastructure, not a warehouse of final files. It combines historical materials, scientific protocols, engineering solutions, training programs and performance history. Separately, cultural significance, scientific verification and rights of use are taken into account.

Stage

Obligatory result

1. Reception

Original, source, author or applicant, date and basis of transfer.

2. Description

Permanent ID, type, theme, territory, version and links.

3. Verification

Status: primary material, hypothesis, evaluation or confirmed result; expert comments.

4. Rights and access

Rightholder, permitted actions, restrictions and term of access revision.

5. Saving

Integrity control, backups, change log, and recovery test.

6. Reuse

A reference to the curriculum, calculation or solution in which the material is actually used.

It is proposed to coordinate the preservation metadata with PREMIS, where objects, events, rights and agents differ. The relationships of origin of the data can be described by means of W3C PROV-O: essence, action and responsible agent. These are methodological guidelines, not a declared system certification. [I3; I4]

Minimum pilot result

The proposed volume is 100 of the described archival objects; for each source and access mode are determined. At least 10 objects are associated with specific programs or scenarios. For materials with undefined rights, access restriction is fixed, not a fictional permission. At least one documented recovery of the agreed set is carried out.

The checksum confirms the immutability of the file, but not the truth of the content. AI can help to search and describe materials, but does not establish authorship or authenticity without verification.

05 / ACADEMY AND APPLICATION SCIENCE

From heritage to competence and technology

Knowledge becomes a development resource when it can be understood, tested, applied, and passed on to the next participant. A Guide to Open Science UNESCO — Accessibility and reuse of scientific knowledge, together with responsible openness management. In the project, the access mode is established by the material and task. [and2]

Programme

Practical product

Verification

Energy literacy

Two training programs: "How the balance of energy is arranged" and "How the result is confirmed".

Entrance task and final practical work on one method.

Biocenoses and engineering environment

Field protocols of water, microclimate, loads on routes and energy consumption.

Season, measurement points, data quality and re-observation.

Materials of the New Order

Tasks for ceramics and synthetic crystals: leukosapfir, IAG, GGG, synthetic diamond.

Selection of material according to the requirements of the node and tests, and not the prestige of the name.

Sensors, control and robotics

Limited safe monitoring and maintenance tasks.

Comparison with the base method, manual reserve and operational limitations.

Heritage and culture

Thematic collections, scientific biographies, history of engineering solutions.

Origin, rights and connection to the educational program.

Passport of scientific result

Question; method; source materials; performers; test environment; evidence; uncertainty; conclusion; limit of applicability; law; version. A negative result is maintained along with a successful one: it limits the wrong decisions and prevents the repetition of errors.

Partnership, not unconfirmed status

IMASH RAS, universities and specialized institutes are considered as possible scientific partners in individual competencies. Their participation requires agreements. The name "Academy" is used in design architecture and does not in itself confirm accreditation or the right to conduct licensed activities.

06 / COMPUTER GRID

Metacomputers start with a task

GRID is a proposed collaboration of computational resources and permissioned data. It is not equal to the electrical network and does not automatically combine all computers into one machine. The choice of the computing tool is determined by the task, the quality of the result, the costs and access conditions. [P1; P3]

Level

What we launch

Extension condition

1. Register and calculation

Catalog, archive storage, index passport, simple model and solution log.

Real users and verified data.

2. Partner Resources

Isolated calculation tasks on existing sites with coordinated access.

Measured need, contract and ability to repeat the result.

3. Specialized Node

Additional capacities only for confirmed tasks and requirements.

Comparison of life cycle cost, energy, water, personnel and alternatives.

Computational task card

Project identifier; purpose; input and version; permission to use; program method and version; allowable deadlines; quality requirements; resource limit; execution log; result and control calculation. For external service, it is separately noted how much energy is measured, and what is estimated or unknown.

General accounting, different management modes

GRID can offer a schedule of non-critical calculations and assess the impact on the load. The management of protections and critical engineering systems remains in a proven operational loop. At the start, the exchange of data is one-sided: measurements are transferred to analytics, and the change of modes is approved by a responsible specialist.

Own large data center is not a condition for starting. First, we prove the usefulness of calculations and the need for resources, then we solve the issue of capital investments.

07 / ENERGY CONTOUR

Designing a service, not a list of installations

The initial task is to provide the necessary services to people, scientific programs and environmental activities. Before choosing a power source, it is required to describe the current and planned loads, the quality of supply, site restrictions, technical condition and available contractual terms.

Step

What should be established

1. Need

Who receives the service; opening hours; seasonality; electricity, heat and other resources along separate borders.

2. Criticism

Load that can not be interrupted; allowable break; safe stop; manual and backup mode.

3. Measurement

Accounting points, intervals, units, time synchronization, instrument health and pass log.

4. Reduction of losses

Comparison of modes, schedules, maintenance and equipment with the same quality of service.

5. Supply options

Existing network, contractual changes, local generation and accumulation are only in reasonable combinations.

6. Operation

Responsible, service, spare parts, emergency communication, testing and full cycle cost.

Technological neutrality

Solar, wind, thermal and other technologies are not automatically included. For each resource, land, seasonal profile, connection, impact on the natural environment and availability of service are checked. The storage device is considered as a means of energy transfer and mode provision, and not as an independent source of primary energy.

What we fix before investing

Current supply scheme; indications and documents for the available period; installed and actual capacity; critical loads; site restrictions; supplier conditions; maintenance costs. If there is a lack of data, the survey is carried out first, and the required capacity of the “city of the future” is not assigned.

Proposed start: one authorized engineering unit and at least 30 consecutive days of observations. This is enough for a prototype of accounting, but not enough to promise an annual effect without seasonal data.

08 / PHYSICAL ACCOUNT

Energy should not appear twice.

Balance is maintained for one boundary, one period and agreed units. Electricity, heat and fuel are shown in separate streams; the transfer of units or the comparison of the beneficial effect is accompanied by a methodology. The financial cost of energy refers to B01, physical flow to B03.

Electricity balance per interval:
import + local generation + discharge drive =
load + storage charging + exports + grid losses.

The change in the stock of the storage device is taken into account separately with the efficiency of charge and discharge. If the initial and final stock are different, it is neither savings nor new generation. Energy receipts and selection are compared on the explicitly specified sides of the converters.

Conditional example for one day, kW·h

Access to the common tyre

kW·h

Shared tyre consumption

kW·h

Import from the network

630

Payload

1 000

Local generation

450

Battery Charge

200

Discharge of the storage device

160

Export to network

20

—

—

Losses of distribution network

20

Total

1 240

Total

1 240

In this example, the storage capacity at the beginning and end of the day is the same. The difference between charge 200 and grade 160 KW·h — 40 KW·Loss of cycle. External input and generation: 630 + 450 = 1 080 KW·h. Their distribution: 1 000 payload + 20 Exports + 20 network losses + 40 Accumulation losses = 1 080 KW·h.

Quality checks

The discrepancy between the sum of flows, the incomplete interval, different time zones and the negative balance without explanation create a record of the discrepancy. The accounting group establishes the permissibility of the data; the analytics does not hide the error by rounding or averaging.

All the numbers on this page are designed to demonstrate arithmetic. They do not describe Safari Park, existing equipment, or an agreed power supply scheme.

09 / ECO-PPA AND ECONOMY

Linking contracts, not mixing rights

Energy PPA is a contractual instrument for organizing the purchase of energy; the materials of the World Bank separately consider the structure of revenue and the distribution of risks. In our project ECO-PPA is broader: a framework for coordinating energy, resources and verifiable result. These concepts are not identical. [I6; P1]

Treaty block

What is fixed

Power supply

Parties, volume, profile, quality, points of account, price, calculations and responsibility.

Energoservice

Comparison base, change of mode or equipment, effect measurement and result payment rules.

Knowledge and calculations

Composition of services, input materials, licenses, data limitations, quality and acceptance.

Science and education

Program, audience, protocol, rights to the result and confirmation of its achievement.

Archive and Continuity

Security, storage time, portability, access and verification of recovery.

Ecology and public benefit

Measured obligation, boundary, method, checking and separate basis of payment, if any.

Financial accounting rules

Separately, capital investments, operating expenses, working capital and reserve are shown. Savings are not equal to cash flow, and the reduction in kW·h does not guarantee the same share of the reduction in the account: the tariff structure, power, fixed payments and the terms of the contract are affected. The monetary model is filled in according to the survey and proposals of counterparties.

Knowledge and Energy Sustainability Funds

At the start, these can be two target budgets of one operator: the first finances archive, training and research, the second - survey, accounting, reliability and maintenance. The transfer of funds between them is clearly reflected. The promised funding is not shown as money received; the future benefit is not recognized as ready collateral.

This section is a project of contractual architecture, not a legal conclusion. Transactions, tariffs and authorization requirements are checked in relation to the participants, the site and the jurisdiction before signing.

10 / TRADING CLASSIFICATION

19 related balances — no renaming

The B01–B19 codes and names from the original concept are retained. New energy indicators and archive objects link to them rather than forming a competing set of “19 directions”. [П1]

Code

Balance

Application in module

B01

Finance

Funds, expenses, liabilities and reserve.

B02

Materials

Consumables, cable, components, return.

B03

Energy

Electricity, heat, power and peaks.

B04

Production capacity

Availability of scientific and service processes.

B05

Equipment

Condition, service, resource and reserve.

B06

Workforce

Competence, time, preparation and load.

B07

Science

Protocols, data and adopted results.

B08

Technology

Methods, tests and conditions of use.

B09

Infrastructure

Buildings, networks, communication and node readiness.

B10

Transport

Movement of participants and business flights.

B11

Logistics

Supply, stock, timing and execution of orders.

B12

Land

Rights, regimes, sites and restrictions.

B13

Water

Consumption, Return, Quality and Cooling.

B14

Ecology

Biocenoses, effects and recovery.

B15

Carbon

Emissions and absorption at a given boundary.

B16

Data

Origin, quality, access and preservation.

B17

Social impact

Availability of services, skills and benefits to the community.

B18

Security

Dangers, incidents and preparedness.

B19

Strategic development

Goals, dependencies, milestones and commitments.

Example of communication: new curriculum requires staff B06, Knowledge B07, Data B16, Energy B03 and funds B01; Skill is reflected in B17. One effect does not add up over all related balances.

11 / ORION22:22

Nine registers of one decision

ORION connects five levels: meaning, knowledge, decision, action, and memory. Inside them, nine previously defined registers of the "Thinking Stream" are used. For the module "Knowledge and Energy" their codes and meaning are stored. [P1; P3]

Code

Register

Pilot's record

R01

Observations

Node, primary document or user request.

R02

Themes

Why is this important and whose need is affected.

R03

Classification

Object type, balance codes, ORION axis and dictionary version.

R04

Scripts

Base, alternatives, constraints and prerequisites.

R05

Decisions

Choice, basis, authority, budget and terms of review.

R06

Actions

Contractor, term, contract and performance journal.

R07

Results

Accepted product, measured change and side effects.

R08

Evidence

Protocol, measurement, calculation and conclusion of the verifier.

R09

Connections

Relationships between records, versions, rights and balances.

Numbers indicate different directories

22 ORION axis describes objects and context. 19 Balance Sheets Take into Account Resources and Consequences. 19 Human standards describe the conditions of development. 260 indicators - the target volume of a wider system, and not the mandatory equipment of the first launch. For ZE-01 a separate version of the starting set of 12 indicators.

Example of regime change

Observation records peak load. Scenarios compare the transfer of a non-critical task and the base mode. After the decision, the operator changes only the agreed schedule. The result is checked by comparable service, interval data and restrictions. The archive stores the original data, calculation, decision and acceptance.

Symbolic system 20 × 13 = 260 The kin remains a cultural contour. It does not serve as a basis for physical calculations, scientific ranking or restriction of human rights.

12 / MULTI-DIME RATINGS

Development profile instead of a single place

The module uses ten dimensions of the previously proposed profile: human potential; quality of life; nature and biocenoses; education and science; technology and innovation; culture and heritage; social sustainability; economics; cooperation; and long-term sustainability. Energy values are distributed by these measurements without replacing them. [P3]

Proposed rules of calculation

Rule

Application

Comparable group

One type of object, a similar stage and clearly described differences in conditions.

Unified base

Same boundaries, period, definitions, units and quality of service.

Transparent scale

Thresholds and direction "better" are established before calculation; physical value is maintained.

Skips and Uncertainty

"No data" is not replaced by zero, hidden average or positive score.

Resilience check

We change permissible weights and assumptions; we do not publish an unstable conclusion as an accurate rating.

Uncompensated restrictions

Safety, rights, and critical natural constraints are not overshadowed by success in other areas.

Methodological guide - manual OECD/EC-JRC on the construction of composite indicators. The rules given here are a design technique ZE-01 and require approval before real publication. [I7]

Normalization - only after setting thresholds

For an indicator where more means better: s = 100 × min(1; max(0; (x − L)/(U − L))), at U > L. For the reverse direction: s = 100 × min(1; max(0; (U − x)/(U − L)))). L and U are pre-approved thresholds; both formulas are a proposed presentation method, not a mandatory standard.

In the first version, separate values, dynamics, source and completeness of data are published. Aggregate score is not required. Human value rating, social scoring of people and automatic restriction of basic rights are not created.

13 / STARTING INDICATORS PASSPORT

Knowledge and reliability: 01–06

ZE-01 starter set, version 1.0. This is a new applied specification compatible with ORION; it is not presented as an already approved complete register of 260 indicators. Baseline values for the site have not yet been established.

ZE-K01 / Complete archival description

100 × objects with mandatory fields / objects of the accepted directory, %. Archive register; the list of required fields is fixed before checking.

Culture and heritage; B16

ZE-K02 / Re-application of knowledge

The number of unique archival objects used in the programs or decisions made. Object references and act of use; views are not considered use.

Education and Science; B07, B16

ZE-K03 / Proven research results

100 × results with accepted verification / results submitted for verification, %. Protocol and independent review; negative results are not automatically excluded.

Education and science; B07

ZE-K04 / Mastering a practical skill

100 × participants who completed the final task / participants who started the program, %. One evaluation rubric; completion and reasons for elimination are shown separately.

Human potential; B06, B17

ZE-E01 / Uncovered critical load

Minutes of an unexpected interruption of an agreed critical service. Event log and operational data; criticality criterion approved.

Quality of life; B03, B18

ZE-E02 / Specific Energy Services

Energy at the border / comparable service units, kW·h/ed. Counter and service accounting; the total cost and volume of the service are also published.

Economy; B03, B17

For each indicator, the owner, object, period, boundary, version, source, initial value, purpose and status of the check are additionally fixed. If the denominator is zero, the value is marked "not applicable" rather than being calculated conditionally.

13 / STARTING INDICATORS PASSPORT

Efficiency and stability: 07–12

ZE-01 starter set, version 1.0. This is a new applied specification compatible with ORION; it is not presented as an already approved complete register of 260 indicators. Baseline values for the site have not yet been established.

ZE-E03 / Maximum power consumption

Maximum average power over the approved interval, kW. Interval profile; the length of the interval is the same when compared.

Technology and innovation; B03, B09

ZE-E04 / Confirmed consumption reduction

Adjusted base − actual flow, MW·h for the period. Measurement and verification plan; separately uncertainty and reasons for change.

Long-term stability; B03

ZE-S01 / Covering mandatory expenses

Available unlimited money / average mandatory monthly payments, months. Operator accounting; earmarked funds are excluded if not suitable for the intended purpose.

Social sustainability; B01

ZE-N01 / Specific water consumption

Water at the border / comparable service units, m³/unit. Instrument accounting and water assignment; environmental quality is monitored separately.

Nature and biotic communities; B13, B14

ZE-D01 / Completeness of interval data

100 × valid intervals / expected intervals, %. Revenue log; validity rule, omissions and corrections retained.

Technology and innovation; B16

ZE-C01 / Completed joint tasks

Number of accepted tasks with two or more participants and documented contributions. Register of agreements and acceptances; one result is taken into account once.

Cooperation; B07, B19

For each indicator, the owner, object, period, boundary, version, source, initial value, purpose and status of the check are additionally fixed. If the denominator is zero, the value is marked "not applicable" rather than being calculated conditionally.

14 / CALCULATION AND ECONOMY

We confirm the effect of a comparable base

Measurement and verification of savings separate the initial state, the reporting period, the change in conditions and the effect of the event. External methodical reference — FEMP M&V Guidelines 5.0; a specific measurement plan is being developed for the pilot's unit. [I5]

Conditional example for one comparable month

Size

Value

Status

Measured energy in the base month

120 MWh

Conditional baseline observation.

Amendment to agreed terms

+5 MW·h

Conditional model of normalization.

Base under reporting month conditions

125 MWh

120 + 5.

Cost after the event

105 MWh

Conditional measurement.

Decrease in relation to the base

20 MWh

125 − 105.

Relative decrease

16%

20 / 125 × 100%.

At a conditional variable price 8 RUB/kWh·The change in energy costs is 20 000 × 8 = 160 000 rub. This is not a profit or a full monetary effect: additional costs for equipment, maintenance, measurements, calculations, financing and the structure of the actual account must be taken into account.

Three Comparable Options

A:Continuation of current mode with necessary maintenance. B: accounting, regulation of schedules and confirmed measures to reduce losses. B: Option B plus local sources or accumulation, if they are justified by calculation. In all variants, the same requirements for service, safety and natural restrictions remain.

The example is entirely conditional. No uncertainty interval is calculated for it. Annual savings, payback and pilot profitability are not declared; a monthly example cannot be automatically multiplied by 12.

15 / PILOT TERRITORY

Safari Park — City of Knowledge

Safari Park remains a natural core, and the City of Knowledge links it to education, applied science, and infrastructure. The Knowledge and Energy module demonstrates this connection at a limited node: resource monitoring → training work → study → selected improvement → verification. [P2]

Part of the territory

Role in the module

Start border

The Natural Core

Biocenoses, ecological routes, observations and family education programs.

Observations without changing the agreed environmental management regimes.

Academy and campus

Workshops, archival laboratory, research groups and scientific residences.

Existing or agreed premises; no mandatory new development.

Engineering Node

Consumption accounting, load schedule and comparison of operating options.

One authorized object with a responsible operator.

City of knowledge and partner sites

Training, application development and reuse of solutions.

External sites under agreements; major functions are considered separately.

Preserved elements of the original design

Academy of Biology and Ecology, club "Young Zoologist", ZOO-hotel "Russian Tiger" and thematic objects can become participants of programs within the limits of really confirmed rights, readiness and operation mode. Their names do not mean that all objects are already built or available for the pilot.

Mentioned in the original concept 67,21 hectares - the original design parameter, and not confirmation of the actual area, rights or permitted development. For ZE-01 the area is not used as the basis of power, budget or number of visitors without separate verification. [P2]

The task of the pilot is to prove the efficiency of a bundle of knowledge and energy. Preserving the natural core is more important than saturating the territory with demonstration plants.

16 / PILOT PASSPORT

ZE-01 as part of NMU-P001

Field

Proposed content

Name

"Knowledge and Energy": Archive, training, accounting and scenarios of one engineering node.

Goal

Check whether the knowledge and measurement mix helps you make better decisions.

Playground

Safari Park - A city of knowledge or an agreed partner node as part of its program.

Border

One engineering object, an archive collection, two training programs, the start profile of ORION.

Preparation period

90 days from team approval, access and budget.

Budget

Not set. It is compiled according to the survey, labor costs and offers of suppliers.

Beyond the Border

Construction of a city, a large data center and mandatory purchase of generation.

Proposed acceptance criteria, not achieved indicators

Result

Criterion

Archive

100 described objects; defined access mode; 10 Confirmed connections with the application.

Measurements

At least 30 consecutive days; at least 95% valid intervals at the agreed boundary.

Scripts

Three options with the same service requirements and explicitly stated assumptions.

Training

Two programs and a protocol for practical assessment; the number is determined by resources.

Profile and evidence

12 passport indicators; available values or explained lack of data; one recovery check.

Decision

Independent review; list of comments; decision to continue, finalize or stop.

Threshold 95%, volume 100 objects and other numbers - the proposed criteria for this pilot. They are not industry standards. Energy savings are not guaranteed and are not the only condition for utility.

17 / MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION

Separation of powers and conflicts of interest

Role

Responsibility

Project Council / Customer

Approve the goal, the limits, the budget, the limits and the decision on the next stage.

Owner of Knowledge and Archive

Responsible for origin, rights, quality of description and recovery.

Operator of the engineering unit

Responsible for the safe operation, measurement and coordination of changes.

IAC / Methodological Director

Describes models, passport indicators, assumptions and limitations of conclusions.

The Accounting Group

Checks data, units, expenses and elimination of double counting.

Independent reviewer

Repeats significant calculations, checks the acceptance and reveals a conflict of interest.

Representatives of participants

Provide feedback on the availability, quality of training and impact on the territory.

Risks that can not be hidden by the final score

Risk

Action

Invalid data or overstated effect

Stop publishing the output; save the original version; repeat the check.

Violation of safety or natural restriction

Stop the affected module prior to evaluation by an authorized specialist.

Lack of material rights

Limit access; set the basis of use; do not disclose automatically.

Budget overrun or dependence on supplier

Revise the stage; check data export and alternative; do not expand commitments silently.

Loss of data or service inaccessibility

Perform a recovery plan; record the test result and correct weaknesses.

AI supports analysis, but does not make final decisions about people's rights, security, funding or the management of critical systems. For corrections and challenges, an open journal of appeals is provided.

18 / FIRST 90 DAYS

From materials and measurements to solutions

Timeframe

Main works

Control output

Days 1–15

Assign roles; check rights and access; select a node; describe a boundary; make a catalog and plan for observations.

Passport ZE-01, register of source data, training budget and list of restrictions.

Days 16–35

Run data collection; describe archival objects; approve 12 passports and two programs; fix basic scenarios.

Working accounting, dictionary versions, program materials and first quality checks.

Days 36–60

Continue observations; compare three options; run programs; link materials to solutions; test recovery.

A set of observations of at least 30 days, calculation dossiers, training and recovery protocols.

Days 61–90

Check data and calculations; close comments; form a multidimensional profile; prepare a solution for the next stage.

Acceptance certificate or list of improvements, costs, restrictions and justification for continuation.

Conditions for transition between stages

The regime cannot be tested until safety and responsibility are defined. An effect cannot be declared until the database and data quality are agreed upon. It is impossible to replicate the solution until its reproducibility, rights and applicability on another site are checked.

What should lie on the table on the 90-th day

One pilot file with passport, sources, 19 linked balances in the applicable part, measurement register, 12 passport indicators, scenarios, program protocols, costs, risks, the result of an independent audit and the draft of the next decision. Unknown values remain unknown and have a receipt plan.

90 days - the period of the proposed preparation and verification of the prototype after permission to start. It does not mean completion of construction, annual energy audits or a full assessment of the long-term environmental impact.

19 / MACHINERY

Knowledge network — cooperation of energy nodes

After checking the pilot, it is proposed to expand not only the set of objects, but also the ability of participants to exchange methods, personnel, permitted data and engineering solutions. A common network is built on interoperability and responsibility, not on mandatory centralization of ownership.

Step

What is being replicated

What is checked again

One node

Dictionary, archive card, load profile and decision cycle.

Data quality and usefulness for a specific service.

Park - City of Knowledge

Training programs, resource management and several related nodes.

Exploitation, seasonality, load on nature and organizational capacity.

Regional network

Catalog of solutions, training of operators, joint research and service.

Logistics, mutual obligations, economics of maintenance and accessibility.

"Peace Parks" / international cooperation

Compatible descriptions, research protocols, and treaty programs.

Local law, languages, climate, rights to materials and the permissibility of exchange.

What does not follow from the association

Computing does not create a single electrical network. Knowledge sharing does not transfer the right to generate. The international catalog does not abolish data regimes and laws of countries. The existence of a single methodology does not make heterogeneous territories automatically comparable.

Next node maturity criterion

There is a responsible operator; the need is confirmed; rights and resources are defined; specialists are trained; a portable archive is available; a measurement plan is agreed; costs and obligations are understood; significant restrictions are met. The new site accepts the protocol, but confirms its base independently.

Energy provides local reliability. Knowledge makes decisions portable. A network is valuable when each participant receives verifiable benefits while maintaining responsibility for their territory.

20 / TECHNICAL TASK

Minimum composition of data and systems

Object

Minimum fields

Archival object

ID, title, author/source, date, version, format, rights, access, integrity control, associated programs and solutions.

Measurement

Node and instrument ID, value, value, unit, interval, time zone, method, quality status, source file.

Scenario

Project ID, basic data, boundaries, model version, prerequisites, limitations, result, uncertainty, executor.

Indicator

Code, definition, formula, source, period, object, denominator, comparison method, owner, verification status.

Decision

Authority, basis, scenario chosen, budget, term, responsible, risks, terms of review and balance sheet linkage.

Acceptance

What is presented, what criterion is applied, who checked, comments, conclusion and preserved evidence.

Functional requirements

Search by object and source; access delimitation; version log; download registers in an open machine-readable format; save originals; link the indicator to primary data; check passes; reproducible calculation; backup and restore test. Automation is added after checking the manual process.

System Acceptance Test

Select one solution; open the used material; repeat the calculation on the fixed version; check the rights; track the flow and the result; restore the agreed set from the backup. The test shall be considered completed only if there is a report and substantial observations are closed.

Required card: ID → Source → Method → period → Version → Law → Responsible → Balance → solution → proof. Different entities are not united by the same field of "value".

21 / DRAFT DECISION

Start module preparation ZE-01

Below is the working wording of the decision for discussion by the initiator, site operator and participants. It is not a signed regulation.

1. Adopt a working concept

Adopt the “New World Order — Knowledge and Energy” module as the basis for preparing ZE-01 within the NMU-P001 “Safari Park — City of Knowledge” pilot.

2. Set boundaries

Limit the start to one engineering node, an archive collection, two educational programs and a set of 12 indicators; do not include obligations for large-scale construction.

3. Appointing those responsible

Determine the customer, the owner of the Archive, the operator of the node, the methodical leader, the Accounting Group and the independent examiner; consolidate powers and conflicts of interest.

4. Allow preparatory work

After confirming the rights, access and budget, start the 90-day cycle; approve the measurement plan, security rules and acceptance forms.

5. Save Single Account

Use the unchanged names B01–B19 and R01–R09; maintain versions of the indicators, archival links, expenditure, risks and the correction history.

6. Consider the next stage

As a result of the audit, make a separate decision: continue, modify, limit or stop the module. Scaling to justify the results, not just the readiness of the presentation.

Annexes to the signed decision: pilot’s passport; budget; composition of participants; measurement plan; register of rights and access; road map; acceptance criteria; procedure for independent verification.

Matching: ____________________ Date: ____________________

22 / SOURCES AND VERSIONS

Grounds and status of allegations

External sources verified 05.09.2026. References are the methodological grounds of individual sections and do not mean the approval of the project by these organizations.

Project materials

[P]1] "The New World Order — EQUILIBRIUM", Word, 05.09.2026: architecture, B01–B19, R01–R09 and NMU-P001.
[P2] "Safari Park - City of Knowledge EQUILIBRIUM", Word, 05.09.2026: original territory and functional blocks.
[П3] “New Order — ORION22:22”, PowerPoint, 05.09.2026: development profile, reference lists and the Archive.

Primary External Sources

[I1] IEA. Key Questions on Energy and AI, 16.04.2026. Executive summary.

[I2] UNESCO. Recommendation on Open Science, 2021.

[I3] Library of Congress. PREMIS Data Dictionary, Version 3.0.

[I4] W3C. PROV-O: The PROV Ontology, Recommendation, 2013.

[AND5] U.S. DOE / FEMP. M&V Guidelines, Version 5.0, 14.10.2024.

[I6] World Bank. Power Purchase Agreements and Energy Purchase Agreements.

[I7] OECD / EU / EC-JRC. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators, 2008.

What is added in version 1.0

Module ZE-01; two-way communication of knowledge and energy; the working cycle of the Archive; phased GRID; physical balance with accumulation; 12 passports; two conditional calculated examples; acceptance criteria and 90-day road map. The names of the source balances and registers are retained. The illustration is taken from the current discussion.

Fact is approval with source. A proposal is a design architecture, goal, or rule. An example is conditional numbers. RESULT — measurement and acceptance after the work is done. In this version, there are no real ratings and achieved savings of the pilot.

Published files

Knowledge, energy and territorial pilot · Full published text

Knowledge and Energy — Applied Module ZE-01. Presentation

Source status: Concomitant ZE-01 module concept; pilot proposal, unapproved masterplan

A presentation of the Knowledge and Energy concept: the Archive and GRID, the educational environment, reliable energy services and preservation of the natural core. It shows the Safari Park — City of Knowledge pilot, the transition from a node to a network of territories and decisions needed to begin; the source does not describe the visual concept as an approved master plan.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/library/knowledge-energy-ze01-presentation.html

Open on the site

Slide 1

CITY OF KNOWING

Conceptual image, not master plan.

EQUILIBRIUM

NEW

WORLD CONTRIBUTION

KNOWLEDGE

AND ENERGY

Knowledge gives direction.

Energy provides action.

ARCHIVE

GRID

CITY OF KNOWING

ZE-Module01 • Concept and pilot

05.09.2026 • For Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Slide 2

EQUILIBRIUM / PARADIGM CHANGE

Changing the criterion of success

Not more resources in themselves, but a better solution and verifiable benefit.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

02

Number of documents

→

Applied and verified knowledge

Installed capacity

→

Reliable service and reasonable costs

Dispersed projects

→

Linked data, resources and responsibility

One place in the rating

→

Development profile and quality of evidence

Man and the natural environment are the recipients of the result, not the residual article of the project.

Slide 3

EQUILIBRIUM / WORLD CONTEXT

Computing and energy require a common plan

IEA, April 2026: global electricity consumption by data centres.

Source: IEA, Key Questions on Energy and AI, 16.04.2026 [И1]

03

2025

485

TWt·h

Consumption estimates

2030

950

TWt·h

Central projection

→

This is the entire data center sector, not just AI.

The forecast is not the result achieved or the calculation of our pilot.

Output for ZE-01: First a confirmed problem, then a computational power.

Slide 4

EQUILIBRIUM / ARCHITECTURE

The two paths converge in one solution.

Knowledge justifies action. Energy provides the right service.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

04

CONTOUR OF KNOWLEDGE

Archive → Academy → GRID

Source • method • competence

Scenarios and Reproducible Calculation

CONTOUR OF ENERGY

Need → record → supply

Profile • reliability • service

Service and physical resources

SOLUTION → ACTION → NOTE

The measurement of the result and the evidence are returned to the Archives and related balances.

Slide 5

EQUILIBRIUM / HERITAGE ARCHIVE

Archive — current development infrastructure

We preserve not only the result, but also the origin, rights, method and history of application.

Methodological references: PREMIS [И3], W3C PROV-O [И4] • Project ZE-01

05

01

Appointments

Original

and Source

02

Description

Object

and version

03

Verification

Status

and comments

04

Rights

Mode

Access

05

Saving

Copies

and integrity

06

Application

Programme

or solution

100

objects in the pilot collection

10 connections with application

+ Recovery test

Proposed objectives of the pilot. The integrity of the file is not equal to the truth of the content.

Slide 6

EQUILIBRIUM / ACADEMY AND SCIENCE

Knowledge becomes competence and technology

Openness, verification of applicability and rights to result are considered jointly.

Methodological reference: UNESCO, Recommendation on Open Science [І2]

06

Energy literacy

Energy Balance Workshop

and confirmation of the result.

Biocenoses and engineering environment

Field data, microclimate, water

and limited monitoring tasks.

Materials of the New Order

Ceramics and synthetic crystals:

requirement → test → application.

Culture and heritage

Archival collections and history of decisions

in educational and scientific programs.

Scientific result: question, method, data, verification and limit of applicability.

Slide 7

EQUILIBRIUM / COMPUTER GRID

The metacomputer starts with a confirmed task

Distributed computing is a means of work, not a mandatory mega-building.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

07

01

Register and calculation

Archive, passport indicator,

simple model and magazine

Decisions taken.

02

Partner Resources

Allowed Tasks

in the existing sites.

Contract and Repeatability.

03

Specialized Node

New capacity only

After checking the demand,

Full costs and restrictions.

The job has input data, a version of the method, a time frame, quality and resource limit.

Slide 8

EQUILIBRIUM / ENERGY CONTOUR

First the service. Then profile and technology.

The capacity and composition of the equipment is determined by the survey, not by the image of the future.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

08

01

Need

Who gets the service

and when you need it.

02

Criticism

What can not be interrupted

How to safely stop.

03

Measurement

Boundary, instrument, interval,

unit and data quality.

04

Reduction of losses

Service and modes

the same quality of service.

05

Supply

Network, generation and accumulation

by comparison.

06

Operation

Responsible, repair,

Reserve and full costs.

One agreed engineering node is the sufficient scale of the launch prototype.

Slide 9

EQUILIBRIUM / ENERGY BALANCE

One boundary. One period. No double counting.

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE • Electricity over one day at the common bus, kW·h.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

09

INCOME

COST

Import from the network

630

Local generation

450

Discharge of the storage device

160

Payload

1 000

Battery Charge

200

Exports

20

Network losses

20

1 240

=

1 240

The energy stored did not change over the day. Losses in its cycle: 200 − 160 = 40 kW·h.

This is a demonstration of arithmetic, not the parameters of Safari Park or the scheme of its supply.

Slide 10

EQUILIBRIUM / ECO-PPA AND FUNDS

Binding obligations, sharing treaties

Energy PPA and design frame ECO-PPA are not identical.

Energy Source PPA: World Bank [I6] • Architecture ECO-PPA — project proposal

10

Energy

Volume, profile,

quality, accounting,

price and responsibility.

Knowledge

Materials, licenses,

calculations, training

and acceptance of the result.

Measurement

Base, period,

Modification of conditions

and effect check.

Continuity

Preservation of the Archive,

service,

Output and portability.

Target Knowledge Budget

Energy Sustainability Target Budget

Savings ≠ revenue. A future impact ≠ money already received.

Slide 11

EQUILIBRIUM / 19 RELATED

B01-B19: keep the common language of the project

Energy, knowledge and social effect are related, but do not add up as one quantity.

Basis: the original “New World Order — EQUILIBRIUM” concept, B01–B19

11

B01

Finance

B02

Materials

B03

Energy

B04

Production capacity

B05

Equipment

B06

Workforce

B07

Science

B08

Technology

B09

Infrastructure

B10

Transport

B11

Logistics

B12

Land

B13

Water

B14

Ecology

B15

Carbon

B16

Data

B17

Social impact

B18

Security

B19

Strategic development

Physical flow → B03. Cost → B01. Scientific result → B07. Benefit → B17.

Slide 12

EQUILIBRIUM / THINKING FLOW

Nine registers of one decision

The signal, choice, action and proof are connected by constant identifiers.

Basis: the original EQUILIBRIUM concept, R01–R09 • Application to ZE-01

12

R01

Observations

What's discovered?

R02

Themes

Why is it important?

R03

Classification

What does it relate to?

R04

Scripts

What are the options?

R05

Decisions

Who and what was chosen?

R06

Actions

Who and when performs?

R07

Results

What's changed?

R08

Evidence

What's confirmed?

R09

Connections

What's the connection?

The archive preserves the versions and bases. The accounting team checks the consistency.

Slide 13

EQUILIBRIUM / ORION22:22

Do not mix layers, balances and indicators

Five levels of work: from meaning to memory. Different numbers are different directories.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

13

MEANING

→

KNOWLEDGE

→

DECISION

→

ACTION

→

MEMORY

22

Axis Classification

Description of object and context

19

interconnected balances

Resources and implications

260

indicators in the plan

Not a condition for starting a prototype

12

ZE-01

Application Starter Kit

19 Human Standards and Cultural Outline 20 × 13 retain individual appointments.

Slide 14

EQUILIBRIUM / MULTI-DIME RATINGS

We show the profile, and do not hide the differences on average

We save ten Orion dimensions. The pilot's actual estimates have not yet been calculated.

Basis: ORION profile [П3] • Methodological reference: OECD / EC-JRC [И7]

14

01

Human potential

02

Quality of life

03

Nature and biocenoses

04

Education and science

05

Technology and innovation

06

Culture and heritage

07

Social sustainability

08

Economy

09

Cooperation

10

Long-term sustainability

Next to the assessment

Source

Period and boundary

Physical significance

Data completeness

Limitations

No data is zero. A high score does not negate safety requirements and people’s rights.

Slide 15

EQUILIBRIUM / 12 STARTING INDICATORS

Passport is more important than a beautiful chart

Each indicator has a formula, source, period, owner and verification status.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

15

KNOWLEDGE

ZE-K01

Archive Description

ZE-K02

Re-application

ZE-K03

Verified results

ZE-K04

Skill development

ENERGY

ZE-E01

Interruptions of services

ZE-E02

Energy per unit of service

ZE-E03

Maximum power

ZE-E04

Reduction of consumption

SUSTAINABILITY

ZE-S01

Covering costs

ZE-N01

Water per unit of service

ZE-D01

Data completeness

ZE-C01

Joint tasks

All base values according to the site. The unknown is not replaced by a conditional zero.

Slide 16

EQUILIBRIUM / EFFECT MEASUREMENT

Compare not just "before" and "after", but a comparable base

CONDITIONAL EXAMPLE • One month • Numbers do not apply to Safari Park.

Methodological benchmark of measurement and verification: FEMP M&V Guidelines 5.0 [Y5]

16

Adjusted base

125

MW·h (120 + 5)

After the event

105

MW·h

Decline

16%

20 MWh

At an illustrative 8 rubles/kWh: a 160 000-ruble change in the energy component.

This is not a profit: additional costs and the structure of the account are taken into account separately.

A monthly example cannot be automatically carried forward for a year or used as a promise.

Slide 17

EQUILIBRIUM / SELECTION SCENARIO

First, compare the three options.

The same requirements for service, safety and natural environment.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

17

A

Basic mode

Continuation of work

with necessary

service.

Point of comparison.

B

Accounting and efficiency

Observations, schedules,

elimination of losses

and verifiable changes.

Verified first step.

V

Additional sources

Variant B +

or accumulation,

If it's justified.

Separate justification.

The decision is made at full cost, reliability, limitations and data quality.

Slide 18

EQUILIBRIUM / SAFARI PARK — CITY OF KNOWLEDGE

Natural Core, Academy and Application Node

We check the general model on a limited scale, preserving the natural environment.

Basis: “Safari Park — City of Knowledge”, 05.09.2026 [П2] • Development of module ZE-01

18

The Natural Core

Biocenoses, routes,

Field observations

and family programs.

Academy and Archive

Training workshops,

Research, Heritage

and scientific partners.

Engineering Node

Energy metering,

scenarios and verification

Quality of the required service.

Large city functions - on separately agreed platforms.

The start of the pilot does not require continuous development of the natural core.

Observation → learning → research → decision → measurement → Archive.

Slide 19

EQUILIBRIUM / PILOT PASSPORT ZE-01

90 days: what is proposed to be presented for inspection

The criteria below are project objectives, not achieved results and not industry standards.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

19

100

Descriptive

Archival Objects

30

Consistently

Days of observation

3

Comparable

script

2

conducted

Training programmes

12

Passports

indicators

1

Permitted

the Engineering Unit

Advanced: ≥95% Valid intervals, 10 connection with the application, check recovery.

Slide 20

EQUILIBRIUM / ROAD CARD

From Agreed Borders to Verified Dossier

90 days are counted after the approval of the team, access and budget.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

20

1–15

Boundaries and Responsibility

Select the node.

Checking the rights.

Approve the passport

and a measurement plan.

16–35

Data and programs

Run the account.

Describe the collection.

Approve indicators

and training materials.

36–60

Scenarios and practices

Gather observations.

Compare the options.

Run Programs

and recovery.

61–90

Verification and solution

Repeat the calculations.

Close the comments.

Generate profile

and the next stage.

On day 90: dossier, verification, costs, risks and the decision to continue, refine or stop.

Slide 21

EQUILIBRIUM / MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION

The person is responsible for the decision. The system maintains its foundations.

The roles and order of verification are fixed before the start of work.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

21

Who is responsible

Customer - purpose and budget

Archive — origin and rights

Operator — operation and data

IAC - methodology and scenarios

Reviewer - independent review

What cannot be compensated

Security breach

Unacceptable impact on nature

Lack of right to use

Data exchange and double counting

Opaque restriction of human rights

Knowledge archive and energy sustainability have separate target budgets.

Slide 22

EQUILIBRIUM / TERRITORIES NETWORKS

We will only replicate the solutions after verification

Compatibility of data and programs does not require the centralization of property.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

22

UZEL

Method

and proof

→

CITY OF KNOWING

Programmes

and related services

→

REGION

Cooperation

and training

→

PARKS OF PEACE

International

Research and Exchange

At each site, the rights, needs, base,

personnel, resources, security and the admissibility of data exchange.

Knowledge makes decisions portable. Energy is the local reliability of services.

Slide 23

EQUILIBRIUM / START SOLUTION

ZE-01 is not a mega-building

The next result of the project is a verified dossier of a limited pilot.

Project proposal ZE-01 • Version 1.0

23

01

Agree

The goal, the border,

participants, access,

responsible and budget.

02

Verify

Archive, measurements,

12 passports, scenarios

and acceptance criteria.

03

Solve

Continue, refine,

Limit or stop

Based on the audit.

KNOWLEDGE → JUSTIFICATION → ENERGY → ACTIVITY → USE

The grounds and the result return to the Archive - the next cycle begins with better knowledge.

Slide 24

EQUILIBRIUM / BASIS AND STATUS

Primary sources and project materials

Verified 05.09.2026. References do not imply approval of the project by the designated organizations.

Concept 1.0 • 24 slides • Main texts and diagrams are editable

24

[I1]

IEA · Key Questions on Energy and AI · 2026

The global context

[I2]

UNESCO · Recommendation on Open Science · 2021

Open Science

[I3]

Library of Congress · PREMIS 3.0

Save Metadata

[I4]

W3C · PROV-O · Recommendation

Origin of data

[I5]

U.S. DOE / FEMP · M&V Guidelines 5.0

Measurement and verification

[I6]

World Bank · Power Purchase Agreements

Instrument

[I7]

OECD / EC-JRC · Composite Indicators · 2008

Methodology of indicators

The project is based on two Word documents and the presentation “New Order — ORION22:22”,

prepared on 05.09.2026. The names of 19 balances and nine registers are preserved.

Fact with source • Project proposal • Conditional example • Result after verification

Published files

New Order · Full published text

White Paper of Shared Destiny

Source Status: Associated Author Source

A working model of shared responsibility, 19 directions and balances, projects and verification of results. It includes the City of Knowledge and Cooperation pilot and the Knowledge and Energy programme.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/related-sources/common-destiny-whitepaper.html

Open on the site

CIVILIZATION METAPROJECT • EQUILIBRIUM

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

People. A Living Earth. A Creative Civilisation.

From the common sense to the coordinated actions of a verifiable improvement in life.

SINGLE SURVEY — GENERAL RESPONSIBILITY

It is not the uniformity of people or the predestination of the future, but the ability of free participants to connect knowledge, resources and actions for the sake of life, peace and development.

16 KON Principles

19 ARTICLES

19 BALANCES

Moral and philosophical grounds

the Covenant of One Heaven

Harmonization of needs and opportunities

Three Spheres × 19 Directions × 13 Fields = 741The matrix of the measuring circuit: 13 × 20 = 260

Initiator of the concept: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

Master document for the Book of Kins project · Working edition 1.0 • 9 September 2026

PASSPORT EDITION

The purpose and status of the book

Field

Contents

Name

White Paper of Shared Destiny

ID

BK-ES-001

Edition

1.0 from 09.09.2026. Project for discussion and development of pilots.

Continuity

Development of the White Paper of Destiny master concept. The titles of earlier works are retained in the register.

Subject

Meaningful bases, 19 directions, related balances, institutions, data and execution mechanisms.

Horizon

First cycle: 365 days from the agreed launch. Long-term horizon: 2030–2050, without prejudging the results.

To whom is addressed

Project participants, researchers, engineers, cooperatives, public institutions and potential partners.

Meaning in one paragraph

The book proposes to combine the image of the future with managed practice: from human dignity and careful attitude to the biosphere - to observations, decisions, resources, actions and proven results. Its basic unit is not a slogan or a separate digital service, but a replicable cycle of improving life, for which there is someone to answer.

Four Reading Modes

The basis is author's values and covenant. Architecture - Proposed roles, connections, and classifiers. Proof - sources, measurements and verification. Action - Pilots, formulas and decision-making stages. These regimes complement each other, but do not substitute.

Boundaries of authority and facts

The book is not a law, an international treaty, a medical protocol or confirmation of property rights. Mentioning an organisation indicates a proposed role or the title of an earlier resource, rather than that organisation’s consent to participate. All new formulations of the 16 KON Principles, classifiers and profiles in this edition are proposed for agreement.

The register of previous works reflects the available names and thematic links. The full source files of these works are not included in the current build; their versions, signatures, and actual shipment were not verified. External sources are listed in Annex D.

NAVIGATION

Contents

01 Mission and vision of the common future4

02 Person in center of system5

03 16 KON Principles — Foundations for Joint Action 6

04 the Covenant of One Heaven — 19 Articles8

05 Planetary Lotus and KRISTALL741 12

06 Seven levels: from principle to balance 13

07 19 directions of the New World Order · 14

08 19 Related Balance Sheets: Management Method16

09 Measuring circuit 13 × 2018

10 EQUILIBRIUM and execution architecture19

11 Communities, institutions and peaceful cooperation20

12 Finance, funds and resources21

13 State Designer and productive forces22

14 Science, GRID and Future Research23

15 Validation map and Heritage preservation archive24

16 Five pilots of the first cycle25

17 Roadmap to 365 days27

18 Risks, restrictions and conditions of stop 28

19 Acceptance, update and total commitment29

A Passports 19 Balances30

B Register 260 measuring positions35

B Reference forms36

G Register of previous works and packages39

D Sources and reliability map47

Titles in the content are internal references. Page numbering is updated by Word when you open the document.

CHAPTER 01

Mission and vision of a common future

Shared Destiny is a proposed name for the shared responsibility of individuals, communities, and institutions for the consequences of development. It does not deny the freedom of will, the plurality of cultures and the right to one’s own path. The general is not the way of thinking of each person, but the ability to take into account each other and the conditions for the continuation of life.

A vision of the future

At the center of this image is a person who has access to the necessary help, water, food, knowledge, safe housing and decent work. Nearby is a strong family in a variety of life circumstances, communities of mutual support, living territories, responsible enterprises and science that can explain and test its decisions.

In this book, the New World Order means a project for coordinating human, natural and productive development. It is not a claim that a universal system has already been created or that all contradictions have been eliminated. A way forward is proposed: choose tasks, agree on criteria, test solutions, identify losses and correct mistakes.

What changes in management

The initial question changes from "what object to build?" to "what need to satisfy and how to prove the result?". Object, budget, digital service and organizational structure become means. The project is considered to have taken place not after the release of the presentation or the development of funds, but after confirming the useful result and the ability to maintain it in time.

KEY LEGISLATION

Meaning → need → agreed criterion → surveillance → solution → resource → Action → Result → Proof → Balance update.

What the book brings together

EQUILIBRIUM receives the role of observation and feedback; SFERA - interaction of participants; ECO-PPA - coordination of resource obligations; SPECZASHCHITA - project execution within the confirmed powers. The State Designer links these functions with objects, technologies, territories and life cycle.

Start with a limited area and a few tasks to check. The planetary scale remains a compatibility horizon, but not an excuse for the unlimited volume of the first launch. The right to scale arises through experience, trust and reproducibility of the result.

CHAPTER 02

The man at the center of the system

Human-centricity in the proposed model is not the position of the human icon in the middle of the scheme. This is the rule of choice of goals, methods of measurement and limitations: the solution should increase the real capabilities of people and not turn them into serving material of the system.

Life Route Instead of Departmental Gaps

The need for a person rarely coincides with the border of one institution. Returning to an independent life after an injury may require the help of specialists, an accessible environment, technical means, training, transport and family support. The book proposes to link such actions by a common route, and not to require a person to independently connect uncoordinated services.

In the Second Breath program, the benchmark for the result is an agreed improvement in daily independence. Attending classes, installing the device, and the number of consultations are counted as actions; they are not automatically declared as a restored function. Medical decisions and criteria for assistance are determined by authorized specialists.

Three Questions for Every Program

Question

What you need to show

Who's feeling better?

A defined group and inclusion criteria; the distribution of the effect, not just the average.

What has changed in life?

Access, quality, autonomy, security or real time and resource savings.

How is that confirmed?

Initial state, measurement method, period, restrictions, and participant's right to challenge the record.

Rights are not dependent on registration in the system

Access to fundamental rights should not be made conditional on acceptance of the symbolism, ideology or digital identity of the project. For essential services, the project provides a clear non-discriminatory participation procedure, an opportunity to get an explanation and an accessible channel of treatment without a complex digital procedure.

External moral and legal benchmark for comparison is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which enshrines equal dignity and rights, freedom of conscience and the opportunity to participate in public life. The specific project procedures below are an author's proposal, not an interpretation of all international law. [I03]

STANDARD FOR 19 DIRECTIONS

Each direction describes not only its industry output, but also the result understandable to the person. Where the result cannot be reliably measured with a single digit, several indicators and meaningful assessment involving affected people are used.

CHAPTER 03

16 KON Principles — Foundations for Joint Action

The word "Kon" is used as the author's designation of a moral and philosophical foundation. Below 16 The wording is an editorial version for this book, not a historical reconstruction and not established physical laws of the universe. They do not mix with balances and indicators.

K01. Integrity

The decision is evaluated together with its consequences for man, nature and society. Local winning is not declared a general success until the external losses and conditions for reproduction of the result are disclosed.

K02. Life

The preservation of life and the conditions for its continuation is accepted as the initial moral guide. When the threat of irreversible harm is threatened, priority is given to prevention, assistance and verification of the solution.

K03. Dignity

A person does not become the property of the system, the pledge of the program or a unit of consumable material. His rights, voice, and ability to refuse are retained regardless of the usefulness to the project.

K04. Freedom and responsibility

Participation is based on an understandable choice. Freedom of action is combined with the obligation to disclose risks, to be responsible for consequences and to correct the harm caused in the prescribed manner.

K05. Reciprocity

Cooperation must be clear and fair to all parties. Contributions, benefits, risks and responsibilities are discussed before action begins; the participant's weak position is not used to impose conditions.

K06. Measure

The scale of the solution relates to the need, resources and limits of the environment. Quantity growth is no substitute for quality, and a high goal does not live up to promises for which there is no proven assurance.

K07. Balance

Balance is understood as matching needs, capabilities, and recovery, not immobility. The acceptable deficit has a deadline, a responsible and coverage plan, and sustainability is tested over time.

K08. Diversity

Unity is achieved by the compatibility of actions, not by the sameness of people. Cultural, scientific and organizational differences persist when they do not violate the dignity and security of others.

Chapter 03 • CONTINUATION

16 KON Principles — Measure, Memory and the Future

K09. Truth and verifiability

Observation, opinion, hypothesis, promise, and confirmed result are denoted differently. The error is corrected openly; a reference to authority or a beautiful image does not replace the proof.

K10. Cause and effect

Any explanation of the result should reveal the mechanism and alternative causes. The coincidence of events is not considered a proven influence, and the calculation is separated from the measurement.

K11. Time and rhythm

Each process has a duration, delays, and recovery conditions. Solutions take into account service, seasonality and future liabilities; the short-term effect does not hide the long-term burden.

K12. Continuity

The new develops without destroying the memory of the previous one. Sources, authors and versions are preserved, and revision of views is documented as the development of knowledge, not as the erasure of history.

K13. Creation

Preference is given to actions that increase the real capabilities of people and living systems. Creativity is confirmed by the usefulness, accessibility and reproducibility, not just the scale of the stated design.

K14. Cooperation

Difficult tasks are solved by division of labor, exchange of knowledge and coordination of interests. Competition is not excluded, but should not destroy the foundations of trust and the general conditions of life.

K15. Recovery

Disruption of the balance requires not only explanation, but also correction. For each significant impact, maintenance, recovery actions and the source of their resource support are provided.

K16. An open future

The book does not declare the story complete and does not deprive future generations of choice. Each edition allows for criticism, verification and change while maintaining responsibility for commitments already made.

The use of horses requires a discussion of specific circumstances. When principles clash, the interests affected, the options involved and the reasons for the choice are fixed; a reference to a general principle does not replace a responsible decision.

CHAPTER 04

The Covenant of One Heaven — 19 articles

An independent, original foundational text of the White Paper of Shared Destiny. It is not a translation, abridgement or reproduction of the One-Heaven body of law. The image of One Heaven expresses the shared nature of life and is open to a secular reading.

Preamble. We take responsibility for what we create together and choose to combine freedom with care, knowledge with verification, opportunity with measure, and development with the preservation of life.

Article 1. The Fate of Free People

We recognize the commonality of living conditions and the mutual dependence of the consequences of our actions. Unity does not mean giving up the identity, culture, faith or autonomy of the community. We unite our efforts for peace, dignity and the continuation of life, without declaring any person a means of achieving someone else’s plan.

Practical expression: Each program reveals who benefits, who is affected and how objections are taken into account.

Article 2. Inviolability

Human dignity is not determined by wealth, origin, age, health status, beliefs, or participation in a project. No one should be traded, digitally pledged or a source of obligation without a valid basis. The system serves man and preserves his right to explanation and protection.

Practical expression: The project passport fixes the restrictions on the use of personal data and the independent way of considering the complaint.

Article 3. The World as a Way of Joint Action

We choose to prevent violence, negotiate, help the victims, and rebuild broken ties. Peace is not a statement: it requires safe access to basic goods, dispute resolution and the rejection of collective guilt. Any cooperation is built without coercion to participate in political or spiritual unity.

Practical expression: Peacekeeping proposals have a civilian character, a transparent mandate and agreed security rules.

Article 4. Freedom of conscience and voluntary participation

The participant has the right to share the goals of the book, not accepting its figurative or spiritual language. Accession to the program is based on clear conditions and allows for the settlement of actual obligations. Neither symbol, nor registration, nor silence of a person is a substitute for the expressed consent.

Practical expression: The participant receives a clear description of the conditions, terms, risks and procedure for termination of participation.

Chapter 04 • CONTINUATION

The Covenant of One Heaven • Article 5–9

Article 5. Children and future generations

We evaluate development according to the conditions that it leaves for children. Caring for a child combines security, love, access to knowledge and respect for his growing up. Future generations do not participate in today’s vote, so their interests should be represented in the assessment of long-term solutions.

Practical expression: Projects reveal the consequences for childhood and the obligations to service facilities after the completion of funding.

Article 6. Health and independence

The goal of help is not only to remove obstacles, but also to empower people to live, learn, work and participate in the community. We combine prevention, accessible environment and professional rehabilitation, while maintaining personal choice and confidentiality. The promise of results is no substitute for safety and effectiveness testing.

Practical expression: The outcome criteria are consistent with the person and the specialists; expectations and actual changes achieved are reflected separately.

Article 7. Living Earth

The biosphere is seen as a condition for the existence of civilization, and not as an unlimited warehouse. We preserve the diversity of living systems and take into account the territory’s ability to recover. Intervention must have clear boundaries, monitoring and accountability for consequences.

Practical expression: Natural projects are spatial accounting of the initial state, changes and recovery actions.

Article 8. Water and food

Access to water and nutrition is a priority for development programmes. We combine reliability of supply, safety, availability and careful attitude to sources. Improvements in human supply should not be achieved through the hidden depletion of water systems and soils.

Practical expression: The result is confirmed by data on access, quality, losses and state of sources, and not by one volume of production.

Article 9. Knowledge and education

We support the human right to learn, to ask questions, to check the grounds and to pass on skills. Knowledge retains authorship and is disclosed to society within the agreed rights and security. Education aims at understanding, independence and the ability to act, not just to obtain a document.

Practical expression: Training programs set verifiable learning outcomes and available participation routes for different groups.

Chapter 04 • CONTINUATION

The Covenant of One Heaven • Article 10–14

Article 10. Science and honest research

The courage of design is combined with the discipline of verification. The hypothesis has the right to research, but becomes the basis of mass application only after sufficient confirmation in the relevant field. We maintain methods, limitations and negative results so that subsequent decisions can become more accurate.

Practical expression: The research passport separates assumption, model, test, independent reproduction, and operational result.

Article 11. Labor and the creative economy

We strive for work that provides a decent life, preserves health and develops skills. Entrepreneurship and cooperation should empower individuals, not make dependency a condition for survival. Success is assessed by the quality of the product, the fairness of the relationship and the sustainability of the activity.

Practical expression: The project reveals working conditions, training, payment procedure and safety indicators.

Article 12. Energy and Material Responsibility

Energy, materials and infrastructure serve life and development. We support solutions whose characteristics are confirmed by tests, and the resource cycle takes into account the manufacture, operation, repair and completion of service. Neither the promised capacity nor digital recording replaces the actually available supply.

Practical expression: The passports separately indicate the measured indicators, project assumptions and service obligations.

Article 13. Finance as a means of security

Money and financial instruments should link resources to understandable actions and outcomes. We distinguish between cash, promises, rights and obligations without creating security with one name or symbol. Each participant should understand what he manages, what risks he takes and on what grounds.

Practical expression: In the financing register, the source, owner, appointment, term, restrictions and confirming document are fixed.

Article 14. Cooperation and mutual support

We combine personal initiative with the ability to act together. Cooperatives, foundations, enterprises and public associations have clear roles, internal rules and accountability to participants. The generality of the goal does not cancel the independence of the participants and does not give the right to arbitrarily dispose of their property.

Practical expression: Contribution and distribution of the result are described in advance; conflict of interest is disclosed before a decision is made.

Chapter 04 • CONTINUATION

The Covenant of One Heaven • Article 15–19

Article 15. Culture and memory

We preserve languages, heritage, artistic creativity and memory of the passed way. The general book does not erase differences and does not assign other people's sources. Knowledge transfer involves respect for creators, communities, and access conditions.

Practical Expression: Each heritage record receives an origin, author or bearer of a tradition, terms of use, and history of change.

Article 16. Law and Accountability

Power within project institutes is limited by an understandable mandate and control procedure. The decision should have a basis, a responsibility and the possibility of revision. We do not replace existing public institutions with a self-proclaimed status and do not issue an internal registry for universal jurisdiction.

Practical expression: Before the execution of a significant decision, the powers, applicable rules and order of protection of the affected persons are checked.

Article 17. Data, technology and personal freedom

A digital system helps to see connections and mistakes, but does not become the owner of human destiny. Artificial intelligence supports analysis and does not exempt people from responsibility. Access to the data is limited to the purpose; the person must know how to challenge a decision that significantly affects him or her.

Practical expression: The journal records the origin of the data, the version of the model, the human solution and the possibility of correcting the record.

Article 18. Related Balances and Fair Results

We evaluate action through its impact on several interrelated aspects of life. A positive indicator does not hide the deterioration elsewhere, and the overall reporting does not add up to incomparable values. The promised effect, measured change and proven contribution of the program are reflected separately.

Practical expression: The result is taken together with the sources, methodology, uncertainty assessment and a list of side effects.

Article 19. Continuity and an open future

The White Paper is a living commitment to learn and correct decisions, not the ultimate answer for everyone. We preserve the memory of versions, accept justified criticism, and leave space for new generations to choose from. A single destiny is created not by a single order, but by a sequence of responsible and coordinated actions.

Practical expression: Each new edition contains the reasons for the changes, the retained obligations and the available history of the discussion.

CHAPTER 05

Planetary Lotus and KRISTALL741

"Planetary lotus" and "Three Flowers of Life" are preserved as an image of the project integrity. Their task is to help see relationships; the geometry of the symbol does not prove the physical properties of the world and does not replace measurements. For practical work, the following semantic expansion of the three Spheres is proposed.

Sphere

What it checks in each of the 19 directions

S1. People and communities

Dignity, needs, accessibility, ability, work, culture and quality of life.

S2. Biosphere and Territory

Resources, spatial boundaries, the state of living systems, limits and recovery.

S3. Knowledge and Civilization

Technologies, institutions, infrastructure, data, cooperation and the ability to maintain the result.

Each Sphere looks at the same 19 directions from its own angle. This gives 57 sense nodes, not 57 independent industries. One water project simultaneously relates to human access, water source status and supply technology. The volume of water is taken into account only once.

Three different numbers, three different assignments

Design

Calculation

Purpose

Three Spheres

3 × 19 = 57

Meaningful representations of directions.

KRISTALL741

3 × 19 × 13 = 741

Structured description fields 57 nodes.

Measuring circuit

13 × 20 = 260

Positions of the register of indicators; separate structure.

13 Crystal Node Fields

Purpose; object; boundaries; need; opportunity; flows; responsibility; evidence; risks; solution; resource provision; result; feedback. Key entry: S-sphere-D-direction-F-field. For example, S2-D04-F08 indicates evidence for water direction in biosphere representation.

These 13 fields are the proposed passport format, not 13 indicators of chapter 09. An equal number of elements does not make structures identical. For data exchange, explicit links are established between the passport field and the required indicators.

CONSERVATION OF MEANING

16 KON Principles provide the ethical foundations; 19 articles define a shared commitment; 19 directions define the scope of work; 19 balances monitor interconnections; 741 and 260 are different ways of organising information.

CHAPTER 06

Seven Levels: From Principle to Balance

The proposed seven-level system links values with account and action. It is designed for this book and is not declared a restored One-Heaven technical architecture. It is not the account of the levels that matters, but the absence of gaps between them.

Level

Contents

Verified exit

L1. Foundation

Purpose, value and permissible limitations.

The approved basis of the project and the list of unacceptable harm.

L2. Object

Who and what affects the action; where the boundary passes.

Passport of the object, territory or group of participants.

L3. Eligibility

Rights, consent, responsibility and authority.

Agreed roles and documents sufficient for action.

L4. Decision

Options, selection criteria, deadlines and commitments.

Record the solution with the resource and stopping conditions.

L5. Event

Action and observation of actual changes.

Event record, measurement, or primary document.

L6. Verification

Method, origin of data, independent evaluation.

Conclusion with restrictions and confirmation status.

L7. Balance

Change of Status, Commitments and Next Decision.

Updated balances and orders for the next cycle.

Transition between levels

Each transition has a mandatory question. Is the object defined enough? Is there authority? Is the security confirmed? Can the origin of the data be restored? Has the damage shifted to another balance sheet? The lack of an answer brings the work back to the previous level, rather than masking a beautiful final score.

Separate from ISO/OSI

ISO/IEC 7498-1:1994 describes the basic model of open systems interaction and is designed to harmonize system interaction standards. This is a different subject area. Seven levels of project management do not give grounds to declare compliance ISO/OSI or certification. [and02]

Example of passing

The principle of accessible water → specific water intake and consumers → operator and agreed rights → Loss Reduction Program → instrument readings → Checking the comparability → updating water, energy and financial balances. The seventh level returns the result to the original need: whether the service has become more reliable and affordable?

CHAPTER 07

19 New World Order

This is the working classifier of the edition 1.0, proposed for coordination with the passports of previous programs. It collects known project themes, but does not automatically rename source documents. The direction answers the question "what we change", the balance - "how we take into account the state and consequences".

Code

Area of work

Purposeful meaning

Basic Balances

D01

People, health and rehabilitation

Human autonomy and available assistance

B12, B13

D02

Children, the family and the continuity of generations

Safe childhood and support of free choice of family

B01, B13

D03

Poverty alleviation and social support

Access to basic goods without excluding people

B13, B07

D04

Water and water balance

Reliable water for people and living systems

B03, B02

D05

Climate, living soil and biocenoses

Preservation and restoration of natural functions

B02, B05

D06

Food and nutrition

Affordable, safe and sustainable food supply

B05, B12

D07

Decent work and family income

Safe work, skills and economic independence

B09, B13

D08

Entrepreneurship and cooperation

Viable enterprises and mutually beneficial ties

B14, B09

D09

Education and Cities of Knowledge

Lifelong learning and transfer of skills

B10, B11

D10

Science and technological development

Verifiable knowledge and reproducible technologies

B11, B06

Programs can cross directions

The second breath is connected D01, D07, D10 and D12. "Cooperation and Trade Unions" D07, D08 and D18. "Knowledge and Energy" D09, D10 and D11. The main thing is the result for a person or territory, not departmental affiliation.

Chapter 07 • CONTINUATION

19 Directions • technologies and institutions

Code

Area of work

Purposeful meaning

Basic Balances

D11

Energy and Energy Sustainability

Reliable energy with proven characteristics

B04, B07

D12

Materials, engineering and production

Productive complexes and repairable products

B06, B11

D13

Housing, construction and housing

Safe environment and full life cycle of facilities

B08, B03

D14

Transport and connectivity

Availability of services, markets and research centres

B15, B08

D15

Data, Computational GRID and Communication

Reliable digital environment with access control

B16, B11

D16

Finance, funds and resources

Transparent funding of confirmed actions

B07, B14

D17

Culture, heritage and shared memory

Preserving diversity and access to ancestral knowledge

B17, B10

D18

Governance, law and public institutions

Accountability decisions and resolution of differences

B18, B16

D19

Peace, security and international cooperation

Harm prevention, protection of life and cooperation

B19, B18

Communication with external frames

The UN’s Agenda for the period up to 2030 includes 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets. The book’s classifier does not replace them and does not approve official recognition. A table of correspondences at the task and indicator level is proposed, rather than a matching by number of directions. [I04]

Working examples of comparison: D01 — SDGs 3; D04 — SDGs 6; D07 — SDGs 8; D09 — SDGs 4; D11 — SDGs 7; D13 — SDGs 11; D19 — SDGs 16 and 17. This is an editorial map of the links, not an external assessment of the compliance achieved04]

The direction has a coordinator, a list of tasks, the boundaries of solutions and connections with other directions. The coordinator does not receive authority over all participants just because of his position in the classifier.

CHAPTER 08

19 related balances: method of management

Balances are the basis of a management system when they not only describe the balances, but also link needs, available opportunities, flows, constraints, and responsible decisions. At the same time, the balance itself does not work: you need rules of choice, the performer, resources and feedback.

Two types of presentation

Flow-stock representation is applied where comparable units are defined: water, energy, materials, money by currency. The representation of status and outcome applies to health, education, culture, and institutions. The second type cannot be mechanically attributed to the laws of conservation of the first.

BASIC LEARNING EQUALITY

Stock at the end of the period = stock at the beginning + receipts − disposals + other documented changes. All members have the same units, boundary, and period. Losses and reclassifications are disclosed separately, and not hidden in the "other".

What Makes Balances Linked

The link describes the specific impact: water requires energy; production requires materials and skills; and human recovery involves transportation, labor, and the availability of an environment. Communication has a direction, a reason, a period and a degree of confidence. Causal effects are not considered to be proven just because the two variables have changed simultaneously.

Rule

Practical investigation

One entity, one identifier

One object, payment or delivery does not become a new result when it appears in another report.

Borders and periods

Before the comparison, the territory, population, currency, units and date are checked.

Flows between nodes are agreed

The transfer of the resource from the sender and the receipt from the addressee are linked by a common operation.

Incomparable is not summed up

Rubles, years of life, hectares and kW·h remain different axes of assessment.

The external effect is revealed

Improving one balance is checked for load or damage to others.

For natural accounting, the external methodological guide is SEEA Ecosystem Accounting: the system considers the area, the state of ecosystems and ecosystem services in spatial representation. The specific passport of the book is its own design scheme; compliance with SEEA has yet to be verified separately. [I05]

Chapter 08 • PRACTICAL MODEL

How One Decision Changes Multiple Balances

Below is an exclusively educational calculation for a conditional water supply area. The numbers are not the data of the real object, investment valuation or the declared result of the current program.

Amount for the same period

Initial scenario

Scenario after repair

Water supply to the boundaries of the site, m³

100 000

88 000

Useful transfer to consumers, m³

75 000

75 000

Losses within the boundaries of the site, m³

20 000

8 000

Stock increase, m³

5 000

5 000

Checking equality

100 000 = 75 000 + 20 000 + 5 000

88 000 = 75 000 + 8 000 + 5 000

Conditional specific energy, kW·h/m³

0,60

0,60

Power consumption, kW·h

60 000

52 800

What can be concluded in the framework of assumptions

With constant useful transfer and the same increase in stock, the required supply is reduced by 12 000 m³. Losses are reduced by 60%, The share of losses in the supply is changing with 20,0% up to approximately 9,1%. These are different indicators, they can not be called the same savings.

With a conditional constant specific energy, the calculated reduction is 7 200 KW·h. The real energy effect must be checked by measurements: a change in pressure and operating mode can change the specific flow rate. No cash effect is specified, since the tariff, repair cost and maintenance in the example are not specified.

Map of links

Balance

What is changing or needs to be checked

B03 - water

Filing, loss and comparability of accounting.

B04 - energy

Estimated energy demand; actual readings are a separate check.

B07 - Financial

Repair costs, maintenance and confirmed payments.

B08 — infrastructure

Condition of the site and expected service life.

B02 and B12

The possible effect for the source and humans is not proven by this calculation; separate observations are required.

Decision condition: the initial limits are preserved; the quality and reliability of the service are not deteriorated; loss reduction is confirmed; negative effects are disclosed. Alternative explanations and comparable periods are further compared to approve the causal contribution of the repair.

CHAPTER 09

Measurement framework 13 × 20

The matrix contains 20 blocks of 13 measurement positions: the first 19 correspond to directions D01–D19, while the twentieth is for coordination between systems. D20 is not the twentieth balance. There are 260 slots for indicator profiles, not 260 measurements already obtained.

Axis

What is being checked

Example of indicator form

M01. Need

Scale of Unsatisfied Task

Number of people in need or deficit.

M02. Coverage

Proportion of need actually provided by service

Secured/needy, %.

M03. Quality

Fulfillment of a predetermined criterion

Corresponding checks/all checks, %.

M04. Term

Time from request to result

Median and upper quantile waiting days.

M05. Continuity

Availability of services for the period

Availability time / required time, %.

M06. Resource Efficiency

Result per unit of resource

Useful output / spent resource.

M07. Availability at cost

Load on user

Cost of service / affordable income, %.

M08. Losses

Loss of resource or result

Losses/input, %.

M09. Security

Undesirable consequences

Incidents on the scope of activity.

M10. Recovery

Correction of the disturbed condition

Remediation tasks performed, %.

M11. Sustainability

Ability to withstand failure

Reserve days or recovery time.

M12. Inclusion

Differentiation of access between groups

Coverage gap in percentage points.

M13. Confirmation

Verifiability of result

Results with sufficient evidence, %.

What should be in every passport

Code; meaning; unit; formula; numerator and denominator; boundary; period; source; data owner; method of verification; uncertainty; desired direction of change; conditions of inapplicability. The target value is chosen after the initial measurement and agreement, and not for a beautiful chart.

Some axes are not applicable to individual blocks. Such positions are given the status of "not applicable" with an explanation; the lack of data is a separate status. Neither is replaced by a zero. 260 is the capacity of the working circuit, and not the requirement to invent an unnecessary indicator.

A summary assessment is allowed only for exposed weights, rationing and sensitivity. Violation of rights or security threshold is not compensated by a high score in another area. A complete code register is provided in Appendix B.

CHAPTER 10

EQUILIBRIUM and execution architecture

EQUILIBRIUM is designed as a system of observation, coordination and feedback. Its purpose is to show the state, identify inconsistencies in decisions and return the verified result to the general memory. This is not a single all-powerful operator and not a substitute for professional responsibility.

Component

Proposed function

The main exit

EQUILIBRIUM

Monitoring, scenarios, control of connections and changes.

A picture of the state and reasonable signals for decision.

SFERA

Interaction of people, organizations and project teams.

Clear requests, suggestions and agreed roles.

ECO-PPA

Mobilization of resources and harmonization of commitments.

Confirmed assurance of a specific action.

SPECZASHCHITA

Organization of execution within the limits of contracts and powers.

Work accomplished, documents and elimination of comments.

The Accounting Group

Methodology, identifiers, reconciliation and consolidation.

Comparable balances without double counting.

Computational Grid

Share computing tasks and resources.

Reproducible calculation with data version and model.

State Constructor

Relationship of objects, technologies, territory and life cycle.

Coordinated configuration of the development program.

Validation Centers

Checking data and results with independence disclosure.

Conclusion on the sufficiency of evidence.

Working cycle

Monitoring → meaning → Classification → script → solution → Action → Result → Proof → Lesson → new rule. Each link keeps in touch with the previous one. The model signal can initiate verification, but does not itself become a confirmed fact or a mandatory order.

Levels of access and separation of functions

The social layer shows the tasks, approved solutions, aggregated results and sources. The working layer contains details of projects. A limited layer stores personal, contractual and other protected data. The verifier shall not confirm his own work without disclosing a conflict of interest and additional control.

The proposed interactions with the RF CCI, ASI, scientific institutions and threat assessment bodies are formalized by separate agreements. Mentioning such roles in the concept does not confirm their acceptance by the organizations concerned.

CHAPTER 11

Communities, institutions and peaceful cooperation

A strong community is not built on a consensus. It arises around understandable common objectives, mutual benefit, rules of engagement, and the ability to resolve differences. The participant must see not only the purpose of the merger, but also his own voice, the boundaries of obligations and the way out.

Proposed institutional model

Project Institute

Function

Limitation

Meeting of participants

Discussion of objectives, selection of representatives and rules of participation.

It does not replace the public authority of the state.

Directions Council

Alignment of needs and cross-sectoral linkages.

It does not have the right to appropriate assets or impose participation.

Scientific and Expert Council

Methods, examination and analysis of uncertainty.

It separates scientific findings from value preferences.

Project Office

Terms, resources, executors and log of decisions.

It does not accept its accountability for independent evaluation.

Independent review

Complaints, conflicts of interest and reasonableness checks.

Has access to the necessary evidence with data protection.

Cooperation and trade unions

Entrepreneurs, cooperatives and workers’ representatives are involved in the harmonization of production tasks, working conditions, training and risk distribution. Voluntary cooperation does not negate contractual autonomy. Project savings should not be achieved by hidden deterioration of working conditions or transfer of family costs.

The Collective Security Council — A Project Role

In the book, this is the name of the proposed platform for risk assessment and peaceful cooperation. It can compare threats to basic life systems, organize expert dialogue and propose preparedness measures. It is not attributed to the powers of the existing international bodies, the right to use coercion or self-management of armed structures.

Practical Peace Programme

The first set of joint tasks is assistance to victims, water and shelter rehabilitation, exchange of professional knowledge, cultural ties and safe civil projects. Each initiative receives an agreed mandate, a range of participants, a publicly explicable goal and a harm prevention mechanism. Political differences do not become the collective fault of the population.

The image of “the planet as one state” in this edition is read as a horizon of compatibility and common responsibility. Any proposals for real political and legal reforms require an independent legal process and free coordination; symbolic unity does not replace it.

CHAPTER 12

Finance, funds and resources

The financial system of the project should make it possible to act and at the same time show the limit of obligations. Key principle: the resource is not considered available by the name of the document, but after checking the owner, the basis of the order, restrictions, time and possibility of actual use.

Fund System of the New Order

Contour

Purpose

Trust condition

Personal and family

Consideration of agreed goals, human rights and participation in the results.

No assessment of personality as collateral; voluntariness and confidentiality.

Cooperative

Co-provision of works and distribution of results.

Rules of contribution, expenses, participation in management and exit.

Project

Funds for a specific amount of work and life cycle.

Confirmed sources and milestone terms of spending.

Community and Rehabilitation

Support for the common good and repairing the damage.

Transparent assignment, access criteria and independent monitoring.

"Man - Bank": working reading

In conceptual language, this formula emphasizes the independence of a person and his participation in the creation of value. To implement it, it is transferred to account for personal goals, rights, competencies, contributions and agreed payments. The book does not attribute banking status to a person, does not create a monetary emission and does not recognize the obligations of third parties by the mere fact of personal registration.

ECO-PPA and confirmation of the resource result

In this book ECO-PPA is a project outline of resource mobilization. Its registry shares the intent, the agreed commitment, the available resource, the delivery completed and the work undertaken. For the energy project, the right to order, volume and schedule of delivery, measurement, quality, cost, restrictions and liability are separately checked.

The product statement, the 30 forecast and the digital token are not considered here to be proof of the energy already produced. The unit of account kW·h is not equal to a monetary obligation without a separate contractual basis. Title, pledge, set-off and right of claim are considered only on the basis of audited documents and after a specialized legal assessment.

Life cycle financing

Estimates include the preparation, implementation, operation, maintenance, verification of the result, restoration and completion of the project. Income, grant, loan, contribution and savings are shown separately. The next step shall be allowed after confirmation of the result of the previous one, if it is provided by the agreed conditions.

The specific amounts, returns and sources of funding for this book are not approved. Their absence is not hidden by contingent assets; they must appear in the passports of real pilots.

CHAPTER 13

State Constructor and Productive Forces

The State Constructor is proposed as a system for coordinating development, rather than a showcase of proposals. It connects territory, need, technology, production complex, infrastructure, resource cycle and 19 balances. The name refers to the project concept, not the fact of the creation of a state body.

SPACE AXES

Russia → macroregions → industrial cores → energy hubs → transport corridors → science and technology centres → New Order Complexes → interregional cooperation → 19 balances.

Eight layers of the project model

Layer

Contents

1. Territory and population

Spatial boundaries, resettlement, access to services and restrictions.

2. Biosphere and resources

Water, soil, ecosystems, materials and regenerative capacity.

3. Energy

Sources, networks, modes, measurement and reliability of supply.

4. Transport and infrastructure

Connectivity, logistics, housing, housing and utilities and the life cycle of objects.

5. Science and competence

Institutes, laboratories, education, skills and testing base.

6. Production

Technological chains, capacities, products, maintenance and processing.

7. Cooperation and finance

Participants, contracts, funds, confirmed resources and obligations.

8. Management and data

Passports, solutions, validation cards, balances and feedback.

New Order Complex

The complex is described through a function, not just a set of buildings. It integrates research, materials, production, energy, repair, training, quality management and resource recovery. Ceramics and synthetic crystals are preserved as separate classes of materials; their suitability is determined by the task and results of the tests, and not by belonging to a common image of the future.

The Master Plan 2050, Eight Macroregion Profiles and Register of 50 Complexes packages are retained as separate project sources. Their complete lists are not recreated from memory or declared approved in this edition; source files are added through the register in Appendix D.

The designer's pilot must show at least one closed chain: → tested technology → manufacture → operation → measured result → service. Scaling without this chain increases the number of objects, but does not prove the performance of the system.

CHAPTER 14

Science, GRID and the study of the future

The book supports a broad research horizon: machine science, materials science, physical chemistry, plasma, biosphere processes, digital models and rehabilitation methods. The novelty of the idea is a basis for research, but not ready proof of its effectiveness or safety.

Ladder of Evidence

Stage

What is required for the transition

Idea and hypothesis

Clear statement, scope, intended mechanism and method of verification.

Model

Explicit assumptions, data, boundary conditions, sensitivity, and computational verification.

Laboratory test

Protocol, equipment, raw data, error evaluation and repeatability.

Independent playback

Sufficient materials for other competent team and comparison of results.

Limited pilot

Control of risks, agreed criteria and the possibility of a safe stop.

Operation

Maintenance, monitoring, incident analysis and periodic reassessment.

Planetary GRID / Metacomputer

In a project sense, it is the sharing of distributed computing resources through understandable interfaces, access rules and reproducible tasks. Combining capacities alone does not create a common mind and does not guarantee the acceleration of any task. For each calculation, data, program version, parameters, restrictions and the result are stored.

Hypergraphs and digital models

The hypergraph in the proposed model relates many participants, objects, resources, and rules in one relation. For example, the rehabilitation route simultaneously includes a person, specialists, device, transport and fund. Such a record helps not to lose contact, but the quality of the solution still depends on the completeness of the data and the verifiability of assumptions.

Space and philosophical horizon

The topics of “density change”, “measurement change”, Law of One, galactic keys and time cycles are preserved in a separate philosophical and research layer. They are not used in the book as a confirmed physical mechanism for controlling weather, energy, or health. The testable hypothesis is granted a separate research passport; the symbolic interpretation retains its status.

New energy solutions require a transparent balance of input and output energy, storage accounting and independent testing. An untested characteristic is not included in the guaranteed capacity of the infrastructure and does not become the basis for financial support.

CHAPTER 15

Validation Map and Heritage Preservation Archive

The validation map shows not only the content of the statement, but also the limit of what is known. Each significant record should allow you to restore who, when, by what method and on what basis the result was obtained. The principle of data origin is useful guide W3C PROV, describing the relationships between entities, actions, and participants in the creation of information07]

Status

Significance in the book

C - value position

The basis of choice; it is not presented as an empirical discovery.

P - project proposal

Desired organization of action; requires coordination and verification of feasibility.

G - Hypothesis

Probable assumption; result not yet established.

M - model calculation

Output within the disclosed assumptions and raw data.

H - Observation

Recorded measurement or documented fact with source.

B - Confirmed conclusion

A conclusion supported by sufficient evidence in this area.

C. The disputed claim

There are objections, conflicting sources or insufficient verification.

One-Heaven as a Comparative Source

The One-Heaven main page archive of 25 June 2014 contains links to spiritual texts, canons, participatory, banking, and judicial sections. It confirms the publication of such names, but does not in itself certify the legal status of the designated structures. This book uses the source to compare designs, not to recognize universal jurisdiction. [I01]

The Covenant of 19 articles and the seven functional levels of this book are a separate development. Historical statements about trusts, title, assumed obligations and similar structures are not accepted without a separate verification of the primary documents and applicable law.

Live Archive

The document receives the identifier, original title, author, version, date, source, access rights and project links. The original version is not replaced by a later edition: history is stored. The checksum helps to detect a file change, but does not confirm the truth of its content or the validity of the signature.

Artificial Intelligence and Responsibility

AI can help classify and compare data. Significant decisions preserve the responsible person, the reason log and the challenge order. NIST AI RMF is considered as a voluntary risk management framework AI; reference to it does not mean project certification or automatic model safety. [I06]

CHAPTER 16

Five pilots of the first cycle

The pilot is a limited test of the work chain, not a reduced advertising version of the global program. For each pilot, participants, boundary, initial state, success criterion, resource limit, risks and stopping conditions are determined in advance. None of the pilots described in this book is declared funded or launched.

Pilot 1. "Second Breath"

Task: to connect vocational rehabilitation, accessible environment, technical means, training and return to the chosen types of daily activities. Contour: D01, D07, D10, D12; B12, B13, B09. Result: change in agreed roles and availability of assistance. Evidence: initial assessment, professional surveillance protocol, participant feedback and list of undesirable events.

Entry to the pilot is voluntary. The number of participants and the duration are determined after evaluating the capabilities of the team. Professional help is not replaced by a digital rating; the negative result is not hidden by the exclusion of the participant from the report.

Pilot 2. Water and water balance »

Objective: to show the measurable effect of maintenance and reduction of losses on one site. Contour: D04, D11, D13; B03, B04, B08, B07. Result: confirmed change in losses while maintaining quality and useful delivery. Evidence: Uniform boundaries, metering devices, comparable periods, work log and verification of alternative causes of change.

A critical risk is to accept the change in readings due to the replacement of the technique for real savings. The condition of stopping is a deterioration in the safety or quality of service. The training example of Chapter 08 shows the form of calculation, but does not replace the original site data.

Pilot 3. "Living soil and food"

Objective: to compare the selected site management practices with the initial state and, where possible, with a comparable site. Contour: D05, D06, D04; B02, B05, B03. Result: measured changes in soil, product, resource consumption and risk. Proof: Sample location, season, method, weather conditions and treatment description.

The name "biodynamic" does not in itself serve as proof of advantage. Each practice is evaluated separately; the impact of weather and site differences is disclosed. Monetary and biophysical results are not combined without an explicit methodology.

GENERAL CRITERIA OF TRANSITION

The next stage is allowed not because the calendar period has expired, but because the security, data quality, performance of obligations and the sufficiency of the result for the next solution have been confirmed.

Chapter 16 • CONTINUATION

Pilots of the system, not just technology

Pilot 4. "City of Knowledge and Cooperation"

Task: to connect one educational platform, research team and production participants around a specific useful task. Contour: D09, D08, D10, D07; B10, B14, B11, B09. Result: confirmed skill development and completed work with a clear customer and user.

Indicators: access to the program, completion, practical development, task performance, safety and sustainability of cooperation. The number of meetings and certificates is not considered a sufficient result. In the Safari Park + City of Knowledge, natural and educational contours are additionally checked for restrictions on the handling of living systems.

Pilot 5. "The perfect document"

Task: to conduct one inter-organizational program through common identifiers, versions, solutions, confirmation of resources and acceptance of the result. Contour: D15, D18, D16; B16, B18, B07. Result: Participants restore the origin of the solution and the state of obligations without manually searching for uncoordinated archives.

Indicators: search time, share of records with origin, number of uncoordinated versions, speed of error correction and data recovery success. Automation is not considered a success if it makes the wrong decision less noticeable or deprives the person of the possibility of objection.

A single scheme for the reception of five pilots

Verification

Condition of completion of the stage

Authority and participation

The roles, consent and limits of data use are fixed.

Baseline state

The reference point and comparability of future measurements have been determined.

Resources

The work and subsequent maintenance have confirmed security.

Action

There is a journal of actually completed works and deviations.

Result

A useful output is shown; actions and effect are not mixed.

Evidence

Verification independence is disclosed, limitations and errors are saved.

Decision

Select: Continue, change, repeat, pause or terminate.

All five pilots use the same application form B. This allows you to compare the manageability of programs without forcing different areas to measure the beneficial effect with the same physical magnitude.

CHAPTER 17

Road map for 365 days

Day 0 is the date of a separate launch decision after confirmation of participants and resources. It is not automatically assigned by the date of publication of the book. The calendar below is a project sequence with control conditions, not a promise of an inevitable outcome.

Stage

Work

Result for the transition

Days 0–30Foundations

Alignment of purpose, participants, boundaries, roles, and constraints. choice of pilots.

Signed or otherwise duly executed grounds for participation; owners of tasks.

Days 31–60Original painting

Passports of objects, initial measurements, register of documents and risk map.

Sufficient baseline data; identified gaps are not hidden.

Days 61–90Design

Solution options, life cycle estimates, contracts and a verification plan.

Confirmed first-stage security and clear acceptance conditions.

Days 91–180Performance

Limited launch, monitoring, event registration and adjustments.

Works completed; incidents reviewed; data available for review.

Days 181–270Check

Comparison of results, repeated checks and analysis of side effects.

Conclusion on the result with restrictions and decision on continuation.

Days 271–365Fixing

Maintenance, Knowledge Transfer, Book Update and Next Cycle Selection.

Steady-state or documented termination; published lessons.

Control rhythm

The team keeps a log of events as they occur. The working review checks actions and obstacles. The monthly review checks resources, liabilities and balance sheet changes. The quarterly review examines the quality of the result, the risks and the reasons to continue the program. The frequency is specified by the risk and speed of the process.

What to expect at the end of the first cycle

Not a report on the built world system, but several proven management chains; initial and final data; current passports of balances; a recoverable register of documents; clear rules of collaboration; decisions on scaling those approaches that really stood the test.

MASSTABING CRITERIA

Another competent participant is able to understand the method, reproduce the action under comparable conditions, verify the result and maintain it without hidden obligations and uncertain sources of funding.

CHAPTER 18

Risks, restrictions and stopping conditions

A risk system is needed not to abandon bold goals, but to detect errors early before they affect people and the sustainability of the program. The risk is received by the owner, a sign of the onset, a measure of reduction and a pre-agreed action.

Risk

Early sign

Protective action

Mixing image and fact

A symbol or hypothesis is used as evidence.

Return approval to correct status; assign verification.

Insufficient authority

There is no reason to manage the resource or data.

Suspend the action until confirmed.

Unconfirmed funding

The estimate is based on promises or a controversial title.

Not to accept new obligations; to reassign security.

Double counting

One delivery or effect is shown several times.

Verify consolidation identifiers and boundaries.

Invalid data

No origin, methodology or comparable period.

Exclude from the confirmed result by saving the error record.

Harm to man

Deterioration of security, availability or data protection is violated.

Immediate protection of participants and profile investigation.

Harm to the biosphere

Negative change beyond agreed limits.

Stop the impact and execute the recovery plan.

Concentration of control

One party sets the data, the solution and their own verification.

Divide functions and include independent review.

Unsustainable service

No personnel, spare parts, budget or responsible.

Do not scale; restore the operating model.

Distrust and exclusion of people

Participants do not understand the conditions or cannot challenge the decision.

Review communication, access and complaint procedure.

Unconditional reasons for pause

Immediate threat to life; material violation of the agreed rights of participants; work outside the confirmed authority; substitution of primary data; unsecured obligations that threaten the continuation of a critical service. Specific thresholds and emergency procedures are defined in the pilot’s passport before launch.

Disassembly without concealment

After an incident, data is stored, participants are protected and the immediate cause, organizational conditions and system error are shared. Resumption requires a confirmed elimination of the cause, not just a new promise. Closing a failed pilot with a useful lesson is better to continue for the sake of a beautiful report.

CHAPTER 19

Adoption, updating and general commitment

The white paper is proposed as an open architecture of joint action. It allows for step-by-step acceptance: the participant can agree on the goals of a particular pilot and the rules for verification, without taking all the philosophical positions or the whole long-term image of the future.

Method of adoption

First, the boundaries of application, principles and prohibitions on the substitution of facts are discussed. Working classifiers, roles, pilots, and recording forms are then agreed upon. After checking the resources and powers, a separate decision on the launch is made. Just reading the book does not create obligations.

Modification order

The proposal receives the identifier, the author, the justification, the articles affected and the evaluation of the consequences. The editorial group publishes a comparison of versions and collects objections. Changes in the principles, rights of participants and resource obligations are not masked by technical changes. The new version fixes the date of action and the transitional order.

What is saved regardless of the version

Human dignity; voluntariness of participation; distinction of knowledge and assumptions; verifiability of significant results; transparency of authority; responsibility for consequences; the right to correction and revision. The format of the registry, the number of working services and specific design decisions may change when justified.

Immediate solutions for harmonization

Decision

Subject of approval

РД-01

Adopt the master document’s name and purpose while preserving the history of the White Paper of Destiny.

РД-02

Review the author’s 16 KON Principles and the 19 articles of the Covenant; record comments.

РД-03

Compare the D01–D19 and B01–B19 classifiers with the original profiles of earlier works.

РД-04

Select a limited set of pilots, participants and launch conditions.

РД-05

Start downloading source documents and confirming resource support.

GENERAL COMMITMENT

We combine freedom with responsibility, knowledge with verification, development with recovery, and personal initiative with cooperation. We do not promise the future instead of action: we consistently create conditions under which a decent life becomes more possible for everyone.

ANNEX A

Passports 19

Working editorial nomenclature. Passports describe the subject matter; initial values, target levels, data owners, and methods of real objects are determined at startup. Numbering requires matching with previous source forms.

B01. Demographic

Border. Population of the territory and movement of age groups; without monetary valuation of a person.

Indicators and Units. Number by age, person; birth, death and migration for the period, person.

Communications. B12, B13, B10. First action. Agree territory boundaries, date and sources; separate observation from scenario.

B02. Natural and Biosphere

Border. Ecosystems within fixed spatial boundaries: area, state and function.

Indicators and Units. Area by type, ha; proportion of surveyed areas, %; status profile according to the method.

Communications. B03, B05, B04. First action. Create a map of sites and a program of repeated observations; do not reduce all nature to one price.

B03. Water

Border. Water intake, supply, storage, use, return and loss; quality is taken into account separately.

Indicators and Units. Volumes for the period, m³; change of stocks, m³; quality of samples according to the chosen method.

Communications. B02, B04, B08. First action. Approve accounting points, devices, intervals and the list of permissible adjustments.

B04. Energetic

Border. Production, import, conversion, consumption, export and energy storage.

Indicators and Units. Power, kW·h; power, kW; separate heat profile; supply interruptions, h.

Communications. B03, B06, B07. First action. Separate power and output; compare meters, contracts and actual delivery.

ANNEX A • CONTINUATION

Balance profiles B05–B08

B05. Food

Border. Food flows and stocks by comparable categories; nutrition is a separate estimate.

Indicators and Units. Release, import, export, consumption and loss, by category; days of security.

Communications. B02, B03, B12. First action. Select the base basket and traceability; do not fold different products without a basis.

B06. Material and production

Border. Materials, products, production facilities, secondary resources and waste.

Indicators and Units. Flows of materials, t by type; output, units; available capacity; return share, %.

Communications. B04, B11, B15. First action. Collect specifications, routes and test passports; exclude the re-registration of one product.

B07. Financial

Border. Money, confirmed claims, liabilities and sources of coverage for owners and currencies.

Indicators and Units. Balances and flows in each currency; payment terms; cash gap; service cost.

Ties. All balances through costs and liabilities. First action. Separate actual funds from applications and forecasts; confirm grounds and authority.

B08. Infrastructure

Border. Physical housing, housing and general infrastructure; transport services - in B15.

Indicators and Units. Objects, units; network length, km; power by type; defects; life cycle costs.

Communications. B03, B04, B15. First action. Create object passports and a service plan; distinguish between the availability of the object and the quality of the service.

ANNEX A • CONTINUATION

Balance profiles B09–B12

B09. Labour and Competence

Border. Jobs, available working hours, qualifications and safety.

Indicators and Units. Employed and vacancies, people; man-hours; confirmed skills; security violations.

Communications. B10, B14, B13. First action. Compare the demand for work with voluntary participation of people and training programs.

B10. Educational and knowledge

Border. Educational needs, access to training, development of competencies and transfer of knowledge.

Indicators and Units. Participants, persons; training places; completion of programs, %; confirmed results of development.

Communications. B09, B11, B17. First action. Identify ways to assess development, not just hours of presence or number of certificates.

B11. Scientific and technological

Border. Research, hypothesis, testing and maturity of technologies within specific tasks.

Indicators and Units. Experiments and reproductions, etc.; criteria fulfilled; availability of equipment, h.

Communications. B06, B10, B16. First action. Disperse idea, prototype, validation and operation; maintain negative results.

B12. Health and functional independence

Border. Needs for assistance, availability of services and changes in human functions; sensitive data is protected.

Indicators and Units. Waiting for help, days; coverage of needy, %; agreed functional outcomes.

Communications. B01, B05, B13. First action. Approve consent, route of assistance and professional evaluation criteria; do not promise a therapeutic effect.

ANNEX A • CONTINUATION

Balance profiles B13–B16

B13. Social Welfare

Border. Availability of basic goods and support; distribution of results among groups.

Indicators and Units. Unmet needs, people; family spending on basic services, %; availability of support.

Communications. B07, B09, B12. First action. Describe the criteria of need, data protection and the procedure for appealing the refusal.

B14. Entrepreneurial and cooperative

Border. Sustainability of production links, execution of contracts and participation of cooperative associations.

Indicators and Units. Active contracts, units; execution on time, %; terms of calculations, days; repeated orders.

Communications. B06, B07, B09. First action. Verify the reality of supply and distribution of responsibility; do not count the number of participants as a success.

B15. Transport and logistics

Border. Movements of people and goods and availability of routes; infrastructure facilities are connected with B08.

Indicators and Units. Access time, min; passenger-km; ton-km; reliability of delivery, %; downtime, h.

Communications. B06, B08, B04. First action. Describe bottlenecks and load calculation; do not duplicate the cost of objects in two balances.

B16. Information and computing

Border. Data, communication, computing tasks, availability of services and the origin of results.

Indicators and Units. Availability, %; delay, s; jobs, ed.; verified records, %; energy consumption.

Communications. B11, B18, B04. First action. Enter identifiers, version control, access log, and recovery test from the backup.

ANNEX A • CONTINUATION

Balance profiles B17–B19

B17. Cultural and Heritage

Border. Heritage objects and practices, access rights, state of preservation and memory transfer.

Indicators and Units. Described units, units; verified digital copies, %; community participation; knowledge transfer events.

Communications. B10, B13, B16. First action. Record origin, authorship, and consent; not assign someone else's heritage to the common system.

B18. Institutional and legal

Border. Powers, decisions, agreements, control procedures and consideration of appeals.

Indicators and Units. Decisions with responsibility, %; response period, days; disputes considered; conflicts of interest.

Communications. B07, B16, B19. First action. Establish a register of powers and a channel for independent review; separate the draft from the existing bodies.

B19. Security, Peace and Sustainability

Border. Threats, incidents, prevention of harm, readiness for recovery and peaceful interaction.

Indicators and Units. Incidents by class, unit; response and recovery time; proven preparedness measures.

Communications. B18, B08, B12. First action. Determine the thresholds for stopping hazardous work and the order of assistance; do not classify violations under the guise of protection.

MANDATORY SUPPLEMENT TO EACH PASSPORT

Territory or object; period; starting point; source; methodology; responsible; access restriction; uncertainty; target solution; resources; verification criterion; date of next revision.

ANNEX B

Register of measuring positions 260

The code is Pbb.mm: bb — block 01–20, mm — here M01–M13 from chapter 09. The same letter P is omitted in the table. For example, the cell 04.08 means P04.08 — Loss rate in the water direction. The table reserves places, not contains measured values.

Block

M01

M02

M03

M04

M05

M06

M07

M08

M09

M10

M11

M12

M13

D01

01.01

01.02

01.03

01.04

01.05

01.06

01.07

01.08

01.09

01.10

01.11

01.12

01.13

D02

02.01

02.02

02.03

02.04

02.05

02.06

02.07

02.08

02.09

02.10

02.11

02.12

02.13

D03

03.01

03.02

03.03

03.04

03.05

03.06

03.07

03.08

03.09

03.10

03.11

03.12

03.13

D04

04.01

04.02

04.03

04.04

04.05

04.06

04.07

04.08

04.09

04.10

04.11

04.12

04.13

D05

05.01

05.02

05.03

05.04

05.05

05.06

05.07

05.08

05.09

05.10

05.11

05.12

05.13

D06

06.01

06.02

06.03

06.04

06.05

06.06

06.07

06.08

06.09

06.10

06.11

06.12

06.13

D07

07.01

07.02

07.03

07.04

07.05

07.06

07.07

07.08

07.09

07.10

07.11

07.12

07.13

D08

08.01

08.02

08.03

08.04

08.05

08.06

08.07

08.08

08.09

08.10

08.11

08.12

08.13

D09

09.01

09.02

09.03

09.04

09.05

09.06

09.07

09.08

09.09

09.10

09.11

09.12

09.13

D10

10.01

10.02

10.03

10.04

10.05

10.06

10.07

10.08

10.09

10.10

10.11

10.12

10.13

D11

11.01

11.02

11.03

11.04

11.05

11.06

11.07

11.08

11.09

11.10

11.11

11.12

11.13

D12

12.01

12.02

12.03

12.04

12.05

12.06

12.07

12.08

12.09

12.10

12.11

12.12

12.13

D13

13.01

13.02

13.03

13.04

13.05

13.06

13.07

13.08

13.09

13.10

13.11

13.12

13.13

D14

14.01

14.02

14.03

14.04

14.05

14.06

14.07

14.08

14.09

14.10

14.11

14.12

14.13

D15

15.01

15.02

15.03

15.04

15.05

15.06

15.07

15.08

15.09

15.10

15.11

15.12

15.13

D16

16.01

16.02

16.03

16.04

16.05

16.06

16.07

16.08

16.09

16.10

16.11

16.12

16.13

D17

17.01

17.02

17.03

17.04

17.05

17.06

17.07

17.08

17.09

17.10

17.11

17.12

17.13

D18

18.01

18.02

18.03

18.04

18.05

18.06

18.07

18.08

18.09

18.10

18.11

18.12

18.13

D19

19.01

19.02

19.03

19.04

19.05

19.06

19.07

19.08

19.09

19.10

19.11

19.12

19.13

D20*

20.01

20.02

20.03

20.04

20.05

20.06

20.07

20.08

20.09

20.10

20.11

20.12

20.13

* D20 - Intersystem coordination: completeness of connections, execution of decisions, quality of summary data and ability to maintain the overall cycle. This is a measuring unit, not a new industry direction or an additional balance.

Status of completion

Design: meaning and method are still consistent. No data: passport is defined, no surveillance. Observation received: data is available, verification is not completed. Verified: conditions of confirmation are fulfilled. Inapplicable: there is a substantial justification for the exception. In this edition, all cells are a design reserve; no actual passports are declared.

Example of passport P04.08

The meaning is the share of water losses taken into account in the supply within the boundaries of the site. Formula - loss / supply × 100%. The unit is the percentage. The period and points of reference are the same for the numerator and denominator. At zero feed, the ratio is not calculated. Comparison is allowed after checking the boundaries, devices and mode. Training calculation of Chapter 08 does not change the status of the register to "verified".

APPENDIX C • FORM Ф-01

Passport of the project: standard of filling

Training filling on the conditional water section of chapter 08. It is not a work permit, a real contract or a report on the effect achieved. In a real passport, role designations are replaced by confirmed participants.

Field

Educational content

ID

PRJ-DEMO-WATER-001; revision 1; status: model example.

Purpose and Result Recipient

Reduce water loss while maintaining useful transmission, quality and reliability of the service.

Directions and balances

D04, D11, D13; B03, B04, B08, B07. Possible links with B02 and B12 Requires separate evaluation.

Border

One conditional area between the agreed input and output devices; same comparison period.

Baseline state

Supply 100 000 m³; transfer 75 000 m³; losses 20 000 m³; increase in storage 5 000 m³.

Hypothesis of action

Repair of the selected site can reduce losses without worsening the service. The causal contribution must be verified.

Target scenario

Feeding 88 000 m³; Transmission 75 000 m³; Losses 8 000 m³; Increase in stock 5 000 m³. It's a calculation, not a guarantee.

Responsibility

Operator - data and service; executor - work; checker - comparability; coordinator - solution.

Grounds and consent

Prior to the actual launch, rights to work, contracts, obligations and restrictions on the use of data are confirmed.

Resource support

Repair estimate, instrument inspection, maintenance and restoration reserve. No cash amounts are given.

Risks and stoppages

Deterioration of quality, interruption of service, incomparability of accounting, lack of security or authority.

Acceptance

Comparable measurements, stored useful transmission, disclosed side effects, checker conclusion.

Next Solution

After checking: continue, change the project, repeat the measurement or complete the pilot.

How to use the form

The coordinator fills out the goal and the border together with the users of the result. The operator confirms the possibility of measurement. The Contractor and the owner of the resource agree on obligations. The examiner shall determine in advance the sufficiency of evidence. The acceptance signature is not put instead of the missing baseline measurement.

APPENDIX C • FORM Ф-02

Proof card and event log

Each significant record has its origin and limit of applicability. This card is a learning example; it cannot be assigned the status of an actual measurement just because the arithmetic is correct.

Field

Mandatory content

Record ID

Unique event or proof code associated with the project and object.

Approval

What exactly is confirmed; without extending the output beyond the data.

Status

C, P, G, M, H, B or C under chapter 15; date of assignment and basis.

Source

Primary file, instrument, protocol, data set or certificate; storage location.

Time and Border

Event date, record date, time zone, object, territory and observation period.

Method

Method of obtaining, unit, formula, equipment, program version and calibration, where applicable.

Responsible

Record creator, data owner and reviewer; disclosure of possible conflict of interest.

Limitations

Gaps, errors, uncertainties, assumptions, and alternative explanations.

Access and Corrections

Access base; version history; fix by new record without hidden removal of source.

Result of verification

Accepted in this area, additional data is needed, rejected or disputed.

Educational Journal

ID

Event or approval

Withdrawal Status/Border

EV-DEMO-01

The baseline values are defined as 100 000 / 75 000 / 20 000 / 5 000 m³.

M - conditional baseline data, not instrument readings.

EV-DEMO-02

The post-repair scenario is defined as 88 000 / 75 000 / 8 000 / 5 000 m³.

M is the project scenario, not the work done.

EV-DEMO-03

Two balance sheets are checked.

M is the arithmetic consistency within the example.

EV-DEMO-04

A difference of 7 200 kWh was calculated at 0,60 kWh/m³.

M is a conditional calculation; no real energy efficiency has been established.

EV-DEMO-05

Effects on health and the biosphere.

D - possible influence; there are no confirmatory measurements in the example.

The transition from M to H requires real observation; from H to B, sufficient verification and a clear field of inference. A beautiful card or a check amount does not increase the status of the content.

APPENDIX C • FORMS Ф-03 AND Ф-04

Decision and balance sheet report

Ф-03. Decision card

Field

What is fixed

Subject

What need or problem is being addressed and why a solution is needed now.

Options

Actions considered, including maintaining the current position; limitations of each.

Grounds

Links to data, sources, advice and applicable regulations.

Selection

Selected action, reasons for rejection of alternatives, affected balances.

Responsibility

Who accepts, who executes, who provides the resource, who checks.

Implementation

Term, budget or other resource limit, acceptance conditions and stopping thresholds.

Revision

The date of verification of the decision and the procedure for complaint or change with new data.

Ф-04. Balance change report

Section

What needs to be reflected

Identification

Balance, object, territory, period, units and comparability with the previous version.

Initial and final status

State values or profile; missing data are marked separately.

Change

Differences, flows, reclassifications, accounting errors and comparison conditions.

Contribution of the program

What can be attributed to the action and what alternative explanations remain.

Connections

Energy, finance, nature, health and other affected balances; exclusion of re-accounting.

Evidence

Primary records, methods, limitations, verification and independence of the verifier.

Decision for the next period

Continuation, maintenance, rectification, additional research or termination.

RULE OF NOTE

First, the quality of the evidence and the sufficiency of the useful result are accepted, then the management conclusion. The work performed, the change in the indicator and the proven causal effect are three different statements.

Annex G

Register of previous works and packages

Inventory of 149 known names in the available project context. This is not an archive of complete texts. For all entries below, the source file is not included in the build; version and checksum are not set. The completion, signature and sending of packages are not verified.

Recording

Known name of work or package

Thematic outline

REG-001

White Paper of Destiny

Grounds

REG-002

The Covenant of One Heaven — 19 articles

Grounds

REG-003

One-Heaven — seven-level information and legal system: reconstruction, verification and integration with 19 balances

Sources

REG-004

Space Order

Grounds

REG-005

16 KON Principles — The Foundation of the Universe

Grounds

REG-006

Planetary lotus

Grounds

REG-007

Three flowers of life. Three Spheres in 19 Spheres

Grounds

REG-008

KRISTALL741

Architecture

REG-009

Doctrine of Victory

Strategy

REG-010

Field Theory / Nodes / Graphs

Methodology

REG-011

Cycle Theory

Methodology

REG-012

NEUROSVOD Civilizations

Methodology

REG-013

Unified Science of Natural Systems

Science

REG-014

Core Mathematics and Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

Science

REG-015

ORION 22:22

Research

REG-016

Quantum Leap of Density and Measurements

Research

REG-017

Space Sciences

Research

REG-018

Galactic Keys and Gates

Research

REG-019

MetaCivilization Project

Strategy

REG-020

The New Order of Knowledge

Strategy

Annex D •

Register of works • records 021–040

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

Recording

Known name of work or package

Thematic outline

REG-021

Unification of Renaissance Systems

Strategy

REG-022

Map of Awakening

Strategy

REG-023

EQUILIBRIUM - White Paper

Architecture

REG-024

State program EQUILIBRIUM

Architecture

REG-025

GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM" - early warning

Monitoring

REG-026

World Portal SFERA

Interaction

REG-027

World Film Portal — SFERA

Culture

REG-028

ECO-PPA №001

Resources

REG-029

SFERA and EQUILIBRIUM + ECO-PPA

Resources

REG-030

Mind Map ECO-PPA

Architecture

REG-031

ESG-IR 1.0

Validation

REG-032

Indicator register and validation centres

Validation

REG-033

SPECZASHCHITA 1.0

Implementation

REG-034

Information and analytical center: assets and projects

Organization

REG-035

One State - Concept

Institutions

REG-036

The Planet as One State

Institutions

REG-037

Consolidation

Cooperation

REG-038

Planetary balance

Balances

REG-039

Balance of Biosphere

Balances

REG-040

Man. Culture and global balance

Balances

Annex D •

Register of works • records 041–060

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

Recording

Known name of work or package

Thematic outline

REG-041

Related balances 19 — unification

Balances

REG-042

Balances as management systems

Balances

REG-043

Russia — SUR: development management system

Management

REG-044

SUR — 810 code

Research

REG-045

The ideal document flow

Data

REG-046

Heritage Preservation Archive

Heritage

REG-047

Validation map

Validation

REG-048

Globe of Meanings

Validation

REG-049

Biocenous labels

Biosphere

REG-050

Dynamic Model of the Biosphere

Biosphere

REG-051

Monitoring and forecasting

Monitoring

REG-052

Design and planning

Management

REG-053

Hydrosphere

Biosphere

REG-054

Air

Biosphere

REG-055

Land use

Biosphere

REG-056

Analysis of Russian balance sheets for 30 years

Analysis

REG-057

Balances for 130 years. Influence of the Academy of Sciences of the Russian Empire, USSR and Russia

Analysis

REG-058

China's Balances for 130 Years

Analysis

REG-059

Balances of the USA

Analysis

REG-060

Synchronization of Russia, China and the United States - effects assessment

Analysis

Annex D •

Register of works • records 061–080

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

Recording

Known name of work or package

Thematic outline

REG-061

Balances by ministries and institutions

Analysis

REG-062

Inter-industry balance. Exits through meanings

Analysis

REG-063

Analysis of the balance of state corporations for 30 years

Analysis

REG-064

Country management — State Corporations

Management

REG-065

Russia — Planning and Design System

Management

REG-066

Russia — A New Order

Strategy

REG-067

Russia - Risk Management

Management

REG-068

State Designer of Russia

Builder

REG-069

Graf of Productive Forces

Builder

REG-070

General scheme of deployment of productive forces of Russia 2050

Builder

REG-071

Eight passports of macroregions of Russia 2050

Territories

REG-072

Register of 50 New Order Complexes

Production

REG-073

Industrial solutions in 19 directions

Production

REG-074

Mechanical Engineering of Russia — Complexes of the New Order

Production

REG-075

State basis of interdepartmental programs

Management

REG-076

Materials of the New Order

Materials

REG-077

Ceramics and synthetic crystals

Materials

REG-078

Physical Chemistry of the New Order

Science

REG-079

Physics of Plasma

Science

REG-080

Robotics of the New Order

Production

Annex D •

Register of works • records 081–100

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

Recording

Known name of work or package

Thematic outline

REG-081

Mobilization complexes

Production

REG-082

Russia — Transport of the Future

Transport

REG-083

Transport 2035–2050

Transport

REG-084

Energy tariffs and carbon units

Energy

REG-085

A concept for autonomous generation in the New World Order

Research

REG-086

Unified Construction Portal

Construction

REG-087

Digital transformation of construction and housing and utilities up to 2030

Construction

REG-088

Package by decree: housing and construction

Construction

REG-089

IA — Intangible Assets

Accounting

REG-090

NMA — world experience of assessment and accounting

Accounting

REG-091

The Accounting Group

Accounting

REG-092

Computational Grid

Calculations

REG-093

Planetary GRID / Metacomputer / Big Data

Calculations

REG-094

IMASH RAS - the structure of the Institute

Science

REG-095

Hypergraphs IMASH RAS - external contours

Science

REG-096

IMASH RAN - Computational GRID. Mathematics of Large Numbers

Science

REG-097

IMASH RAS - Interdepartmental System

Science

REG-098

The new financial system. Man — emission center and bank

Finance

REG-099

Personal and Named Funds

Funds

REG-100

Fund System of the New Order

Funds

Annex D •

Register of works • records 101–120

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

Recording

Known name of work or package

Thematic outline

REG-101

Cooperative funds and personal funds

Funds

REG-102

Global Energy PPA

Resources

REG-103

New World Order — 19 directions

Programmes

REG-104

New World Order - Education

Education

REG-105

New World Order — Health

Health

REG-106

People and health

Health

REG-107

Water and water balance

Water

REG-108

Natural climate, living soil and food

Biosphere

REG-109

Natural climate / Biodynamic farming

Biosphere

REG-110

New World Order - Children

Children

REG-111

Poverty alleviation

Social support

REG-112

Decent work, income and economic independence of the family

Work

REG-113

New World Order — Entrepreneurship

Cooperation

REG-114

Cooperation

Cooperation

REG-115

Cooperation and trade unions

Work

REG-116

New World Order - Security

Security

REG-117

New World Order - Finance

Finance

REG-118

How do we stop the war?

Peace

REG-119

The Collective Security Council

Peace

REG-120

Density change. Change of Measurements. One Goal

Research

Annex D •

Register of works • records 121–140

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

Recording

Known name of work or package

Thematic outline

REG-121

Strong communities — bringing people together

Community

REG-122

Culture. Science. Civilization

Culture

REG-123

Cities of Knowledge

Education

REG-124

Safari Park + City of Knowledge

Territories

REG-125

Knowledge and Energy

Education

REG-126

Unified Lineage System

Community

REG-127

World Builder

Builder

REG-128

the Fire of Knowledge Relay

Culture

REG-129

World Christian Games

Culture

REG-130

Social Programmes of the New Order

Social support

REG-131

Integrated rehabilitation system

Rehabilitation

REG-132

Second Breath

Rehabilitation

REG-133

Materials of the New Order — Prosthetics

Rehabilitation

REG-134

Science and production — Biocenoses

Science

REG-135

Systemic rehabilitation

Rehabilitation

REG-136

Cognitive habilitation and personalized 3D food printing

Rehabilitation

REG-137

Reference forms

Methodology

REG-138

Russia - Soft Power

Culture

REG-139

Dumin's package to the State Council

Address Package

REG-140

Letter from A. R. Belousov - The essence of strategic decisions. Balances

Address Package

Annex D •

Register of works • records 141–149

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

Recording

Known name of work or package

Thematic outline

REG-141

A package of documents for the head of the FSB - Bortnikova A. B.

Address Package

REG-142

Package Civil A.

Address Package

REG-143

Letters to Putin and Lukashenko — United State

Address Package

REG-144

Package for Anthony de Rothschild - Russian and English versions

Address Package

REG-145

The Rothschild package is the New World Order. Image of the Future

Address Package

REG-146

Letter to Rothschild — foreclosure of generation

Address Package

REG-147

The Rothschild Family Tree

Research

REG-148

Formation of the Rothschilds. Anthony de Rothschild

Research

REG-149

Charter 1820, Code of laws of the Russian Empire and constitutional models - comparative analysis

Research

Method of insertion of source documents

After receiving the file, the original name and original date are saved; the version, authorship, access rights, checksum and links to directions are determined. Similar names are not considered the same documents without comparison. The new version is associated with the previous one, and does not erase it.

Identifier REG denotes an inventory record, not proof of the existence of a signed document. The list is open for addition and verification; the completeness of the entire personal archive of this book is not declared.

Annex D

Sources and Reliability Map

External sources were verified by 09.09.2026. Links lead to primary publications, official pages or archive of the primary site. They only support explicitly noted factual information; the book's own suggestions do not receive automatic recognition from them.

[I01] One-Heaven. Main page. Archived image 25.06.2014, 06:31:05.

Open Source

Confirms the presence of navigation sections and names in the picture. Does not confirm the legal force, authority, property or execution of the declared structures.

[AND02] ISO/IEC 7498-1:1994. Information technology — Open Systems Interconnection — Basic Reference Model: The Basic Model.

Open Source

Official card ISO. It is used to distinguish between the network model and the author's seven-level scheme. Conformity or certification of the project is not declared.

[I03] OHCHR. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. English translation.

Open Source

External reference point of equal dignity, rights and freedom of conscience. Full legal analysis of applicability to specific activities was not performed.

[I04] UN. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Open Source

The source of the structure is 17 SDGs and 169 tasks. Comparison with the directions of the book is an editorial map, not a UN assessment.

How the references are indicated

The designation [Ixx] relates a specific factual statement to a source. Normative articles, formulas of the educational example, classifiers, road map and forms are the author's project content of this edition. They cannot be cited as an externally confirmed assessment of the current system.

NEXT EDITION

Add source files → reconciliation nomenclature → matching principles and roles → passports of real pilots → original measurements → verified results. The history of the current edition is preserved as the beginning of this sequence.

Annex D • Extension

Validity limits and next verification cycle

[I05] UN. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Ecosystem Accounting. Methodological page.

Open Source

A landmark of spatial accounting of the area, the state of ecosystems and services. Compliance with their own passports SEEA is not established.

[I06] NIST. AI Risk Management Framework. Official page of the program.

Open Source

Source of information on the voluntary risk management framework AI. For implementation, a specific revision is fixed; this is not a certificate of certification.

[I07] W3C. PROV-Overview. 30.04.2013.

Open Source

Overview of the PROV family and approach to data origin. The book cards are a project format, not a declared implementation of all of the PROV specifications.

What is checked in this edition

Checked individual external information marked by sources; arithmetic 3 × 19 × 13 = 741 and 13 × 20 = 260; educational water-energy calculation; consistency of internal codes of directions and balances. This is not an audit of the future system, its partners or financial reasons.

What remains project-based

The texts of the 16 KON Principles and 19 articles; the names of the three Spheres; 13 node fields; D and B classifiers; measurement axes and 260 positions; governing bodies; partner roles; pilots; launch schedule; forms. Approval of these elements requires separate agreement.

What requires source documents and independent verification

Full versions of previous works; legal status and powers of participants; rights to assets; contracts and financing; technical characteristics of devices; test results and medical outcomes. The book does not recognize this information as confirmed only on the basis of the previous discussion or the name of the package.

Characteristics of archival sources

The date of the archive image refers to a specific page. A link can open a different time frame; the date should be recorded for each page separately. The full One-Heaven case is not included in this edition. Its detailed structure and controversial legal claims require independent source research work.

Published files

New Order · Full published text

White Paper of Shared Destiny

Source Status: Associated Author Source

A working model of shared responsibility, 19 directions and balances, projects and verification of results. It includes the City of Knowledge and Cooperation pilot and the Knowledge and Energy programme.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/related-sources/common-destiny-whitepaper-slides.html

Open on the site

Slide 1

Slide 2

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

02

The meaning of the book: a single fate as a system of action

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

A common destiny is not uniformity. It is the alignment of rights, resources, responsibilities and outcomes around the human and living planet.

☼

Principle

◎

Task

⚙

Decision

✦

Action

▣

Evidence

✓

Balance

The working formula of the book is that every idea must come to a verifiable change in balance, otherwise it remains a slogan.

Slide 3

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

03

What is included in the master document

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

01

Mission, the human being, 16 KON Principles and a Covenant of 19 articles

02

Planetary Lotus, KRISTALL741 and the 13×20 matrix

03

Seven levels of transition from principle to balance

04

19 New World Order destinations and 19 related balances

05

Execution architecture: EQUILIBRIUM, SFERA, ECO-PPA, SPECZASHCHITA

06

Pilots, forms, road map and reliability map

The internal discipline of the document: to separate the inspiring image, design decisions and verifiable facts.

Slide 4

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

04

The Covenant of One Heaven — 19 articles

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

01

The Fate of Free People

02

Inviolability

03

The World as a Way of Action

04

Freedom of conscience and participation

05

Children and future generations

06

Health and independence

07

Living Earth

08

Water and food

09

Knowledge and education

10

Science and research

11

Work and Economics

12

Energy and responsibility

13

Finance as a means

14

Cooperation and support

15

Culture and memory

16

Law and administration

17

Data and personal freedom

18

Related Balance Sheets

19

Continuity of the future

The purpose of the Covenant is not to replace the right, but to set a high ethical framework for the design of solutions.

Slide 5

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

05

19 related balances — result management language

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

Life and Nature

01

Demography

02

Biosphere

03

Water

04

Health

05

Generations

Resources and production

06

Energy

07

Food

08

Materials

09

Infrastructure

10

Work

Knowledge and technology

11

Knowledge

12

Science

13

Technology

14

Culture

15

Space

Institutions and trust

16

Finance

17

Security

18

Management

19

Cooperation

Each balance receives a passport: the object of registration, responsible, metrics, data source, frequency and acceptance criteria.

Slide 6

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

06

Seven Levels: From Meaning to Measurement

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

1

Meaning

Why people need a solution

2

Right

What is allowed and protected

3

Object

What we are considering

4

Consent

Who takes responsibility

5

Action

What is launched on the ground

6

Evidence

What evidence supports the fact

7

Balance

What has changed in the system

Important limitation: this is the author's information and management model; it is not declared compliance with ISO/OSI without a separate certification check.

Such an honest framework strengthens the document: inspiration remains high, and the practical part becomes verifiable.

Slide 7

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

07

Implementation architecture

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

EQUILIBRIUM

surveillance, control, early warning

SFERA

portal, general map of meanings and projects

ECO-PPA

resources, contractual contours, confirmation of the result

SPECZASHCHITA

execution, sites, work safety

One control cycle: observation → Design → resource support → execution → check → Balance update.

The system is needed not for paper control, but for connecting solutions with real life: health, water, energy, labor, territory and trust.

Slide 8

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

08

KRISTALL741 and measurement framework 260

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

3×19×13

KRISTALL741: three Spheres, 19 areas, 13 node fields

13×20

260 measuring positions for certification and comparison

19×19

coherence of balances: one project changes several contours

Objective

object

Participants

resources

Data

metrics

Risks

Law

Finance

Timeline

evidence

acceptance

Update

The meaning of matrices is not to complicate the text, but to make each initiative have a full description and measurable result.

Slide 9

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

09

19 New World Order

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

People and Demography

Health and rehabilitation

Water and water balance

Living soil and food

Energy and autonomous generation

Materials of the New Order

Education and knowledge

Science and GRID

Work and family income

Entrepreneurship and cooperation

Finance and funds

Infrastructure and utilities

Transport of the Future

Culture and memory

Security and peace

State Constructor

Biocenoses and climate

Space development

Future generations

The rule of connectivity: the direction does not live separately. It should show an impact on at least three balances and one human program.

Slide 10

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

10

Five pilots of the first cycle

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

1

Second Breath

rehabilitation, prosthetics, health, independence

2

Water and water balance

accounting of sources, quality, consumption, recovery

3

Living soil and food

biodynamics, fertility, local food safety

4

City of Knowledge and Cooperation

education, work, entrepreneurship, strong communities

5

The ideal document flow

forms, balances, evidence, verification of decisions

Each pilot is accepted not by presentation, but by a set of proofs: passport, pre/after data, responsible, risk list and scaling decision.

Slide 11

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

11

Road map for 365 days

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

0–30 days

single edition, balance sheets passports, source map

31–90 days

pilot package, data register, appointment of responsible

91–180 days

first measurements, adjustments, evidentiary acceptance

181–365 days

scaling, external validation, white paper update

Management rhythm: weekly fact-finding, monthly update of passports, quarterly check of balance sheet coherence.

Slide 12

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

12

Validation Map: Trust Through Verification

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

Source

Where the position is taken from

Status

fact, hypothesis, project solution

Data

which confirms the change

Risk

which can distort the result

Decision

Accept, Rework, Stop

Unconditional reasons for pause: harm to a person, substitution of facts, conflict of interest, legal uncertainty, inability to verify the result.

A strong system is not afraid of limitations. It shows in advance where inspiration ends and responsibility begins.

Slide 13

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

13

Material set and following assemblies

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 09.09.2026

White Paper

master document, 19 chapters, annexes, register of previous works

Presentation

visual version for addressees and work meetings

Image

The cover and symbolic map of the One Destiny

Formularies

Passports of balance sheets, pilots, solutions and sources

Next step

separate packages for 19 destinations and pilots

Important: the register of previous works is a list for inclusion and reconciliation. Past packet files are not automatically embedded in the current book.

Slide 14

Published files

New Order · Full published text

Fund System of the New Order: 19 Registers and 19 Directions

Source Status: Associated Author Source

A concept for integrating personal, named and cooperative funds with profiles, rights, projects, oversight and distribution of results.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/related-sources/new-order-funds.html

Open on the site

FUND SYSTEM OF THE NEW ORDER

Integration of cooperative funds, personal and registered funds on 19 registers and 19 development directions

Conceptual master document • New Order • EG

Summary

The Fund System of the New Order brings together two sources of development: an individual’s personal capital and the collective capital of cooperation. A fund becomes a digital institution with a profile, rights, sources, goals, projects, a balance, indicators, risks and rules for distributing results, rather than a separate “wallet”.

The architecture is constructed as a matrix R01-R19 × N01-N19. Nineteen basic registries provide legal and digital connectivity. Nineteen areas determine which social, industrial, natural and space tasks capital is directed to.

personal and personal funds retain the result of a person, family, family, author and scientific school;

cooperative funds accumulate shares, reserves, investments, production and social funds;

The meta-register links rights, money, projects and effects;

The Living Balance shows not only the balance of funds, but also the state of man, production, territory, biosphere and heritage;

Smart money implements the purpose, limits and preliminary control;

The project result is distributed according to a pre-approved formula between participants, reserves, development, society, nature and future generations.

Summary architecture

Figure 1. A matrix of 19 basic registers and 19 directions of the New Order.

1. Four levels of the fund system

I. Man, family, kind and name

Personal, family, family, name, educational, medical and hereditary funds. The owner retains the rights within the framework of the law and the approved passport of the fund.

II. Cooperative and project

Share, reserve, investment, production, innovation, social and infrastructure funds. Resources are pooled voluntarily and directed to agreed projects.

III. Territory, industry and macroregion

Territory development funds and industry funds link projects, production chains, infrastructure, personnel and natural constraints.

IV. State and planetary contour

The system of funds is aggregated into 19 linked balance sheets, PSC, Metareister, State Constructor and Planetary Balance.

2. Nineteen basic registers

Registers are not a substitute for state systems, but a proposed integration layer. Each record must have a source, data owner, legal basis, access level, change history, and verifiable connections.

Code

Register

Composition of data

Function in the system of funds

R01

Subjects and beneficiaries

Individuals, families, births, co-operators, organizations, communities and peoples

Identification of participants, roles, beneficiaries and successors

R02

Funds and digital passports

Type of fund, mission, term, jurisdiction, governing bodies, rules of use

A single passport of each personal, name, cooperative and project fund

R03

Membership, Shares and Contributions

Membership, share contributions, participation shares, labor and property deposits

Confirmation of participation and calculation of rights to the result

R04

Property and other rights

Ownership, use, management, trust, licenses, easements

Legal map of assets and other property rights

R05

Assets and independent valuation

Financial, material, intellectual, natural, cultural assets

Valuation, revaluation, origin and quality of assets

R06

Accounts, Wallets and Smart Money

Bank accounts, digital wallets, limits, trust funds, reserves

Payment and settlement contour of funds

R07

Transactions and accounting entries

TX-codes, wiring, real and nominal streams, primary documents

Cross-cutting traceability of all operations

R08

Purposes, meanings and MSK-codes

Common purpose, directions, allocation of funds, criteria of admissibility

Relationship of each operation to the mission and social outcome

R09

Projects and inter-agency programmes

Passports of projects, stages, estimates, performers, results

Project distribution of resources in 19 directions

R10

Contracts, obligations and limits

Contracts, obligations, schedules, limits, sureties, guarantees

Preliminary control of liabilities and cash gaps

R11

RID, OIC, licenses and know-how

Patents, copyrights, production secrets, licenses, royalties

Knowledge capitalization and continuous R & D funding

R12

Human capital and competences

Education, qualifications, experience, health, individual trajectories

Human Development Funding and Team Selection

R13

Social guarantees and services

Health, education, housing, rehabilitation, family support

Targeted social policies and fund commitments

R14

Natural capital and the biosphere

Land, water, forest, air, biodiversity, environmental damage and restoration

The relationship of funding to the balance of the biosphere

R15

Spiritual Culture and Heritage

Archives, languages, traditions, works, monuments, knowledge of ancestors

Preservation, assessment and transmission of the great heritage of ancestors

R16

Reserves, insurance and mutual assistance

Contingency funds, mutual insurance, emergency reserves

Sustainability of personal and cooperative contours

R17

Results, effects and 19 balances

Financial, social, natural, scientific, infrastructural results

Live Balance and Goal Achievement Assessment

R18

Verification, audit, risk and protection

Checks, data origins, conflicts of interest, risk models, SPECZASHCHITA

Trust, legality, preliminary control and security

R19

KIN cycles and scheduling calendar

Periods, control points, rhythms 13/20, 52 and 84

Synchronization of plans, transactions, reports and generational cycles

3. Summary matrix 19 directions

Code

Area of work

Cooperative Funds

Personal/name funds

Main registries

Main balance

N01

State Design and Balance Sheets 19

System Development Fund; Fund of Standards and Registers; Interdepartmental Project Fund.

Civil Initiative Fund; State Designer Name Fund.

R02, R08, R09, R10, R17, R18, R19

Balance of goals, resources, obligations and execution across 19 areas.

N02

People, demography and personal development

Human Development Fund; Demographic Fund; Talent Fund.

Personal development fund; life reserve fund; name trajectory fund.

R01, R02, R05, R12, R13, R17, R19

Personal Live Balance: Health, Competence, Income, Assets, Contributions, and Risks.

N03

Family, communities and social programmes

Social fund; mutual assistance fund; family initiatives fund.

Family fund; birth fund; fund for children and future generations.

R01, R02, R03, R13, R16, R17

Balance family commitments, reserves, housing, education and social sustainability.

N04

Health, rehabilitation and longevity

Health fund; rehabilitation fund; medical technology fund.

Personal health fund; family medical reserve; personal fund of the clinic or school.

R02, R05, R09, R11, R12, R13, R16, R17

Balance health, access to care, prevention, costs, and treatment outcomes.

N05

Education, Personnel and Cities of Knowledge

Education Fund; Personnel Reserve Fund; City of Knowledge Fund.

Personal educational fund; family fund of education; personal scholarship.

R02, R09, R11, R12, R13, R15, R17

Balance of competencies, educational results, personnel demand and availability of training.

N06

Science, R & D and intellectual rights

Fund for Innovative Development; Fund for Research and Development; Fund for Scientific Infrastructure.

Name fund of scientist; fund of author and inventor; fund of scientific school.

R04, R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R11, R17, R18

Balance of costs and revenues for RID/OIC, licenses, implementation and technological effect.

N07

Spiritual Culture and the Great Heritage of Ancestors

Heritage Fund; Spiritual Culture Fund; Language and Traditional Knowledge Fund.

Birth fund; name cultural fund; heritage keeper fund.

R01, R04, R05, R09, R11, R15, R17, R18

Balance conservation, accessibility, rights, financing and cultural impact.

N08

Industry, Materials Science and Engineering

Production fund; Fund of modernization; Fund of materials science and robotics.

Name engineering fund; personal fund of production qualification; cooperative share fund participations.

R03, R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R11, R17, R18

Balance of capacities, equipment, materials, orders, personnel, cost and modernization.

N09

Energy, tariffs and carbon units

Energy fund; tariff stabilization fund; energy efficiency fund.

Energy Efficiency Fund of the house; personal energy reserve; personal technology fund.

R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R11, R14, R17

Energy balance, tariff balance, balance of generation, networks, consumption and emissions.

N10

Agriculture, food and water

Agricultural Fund; Food Security Fund; Water Fund.

Family Farm Fund; Land and Crop Fund; Personal Water Reserve.

R03, R04, R05, R09, R10, R12, R14, R16, R17

Balance of land, water, seeds, production, reserves, logistics and consumption.

N11

Nature, Biosphere, Biocenoses and Climate

Biosphere Restoration Fund; Climate Fund; Biocenous Monitoring Fund.

Trustee of the territory; personal environmental fund; family natural fund.

R04, R05, R09, R10, R14, R16, R17, R18, R19

The balance of the biosphere: atmosphere, water, soil, species, man, man-made load and restoration.

N12

Construction, housing and urban infrastructure

Housing cooperative fund; infrastructure fund; urban development fund.

Personal housing fund; family savings fund; personal fund of public space.

R01, R03, R04, R05, R06, R09, R10, R13, R17

Balance housing, land, infrastructure, life cycle cost and urban quality.

N13

Transport, logistics and development corridors

Transport fund; development corridor fund; logistics reserve.

Mobility fund; name of engineering and transport fund; cooperative share fund knots.

R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R17, R18

Balance of passenger flows, cargo, capacity, tariffs, timing and infrastructure wear and tear.

N14

Digital platforms, AI, GRID and data

Digital Infrastructure Fund; Computational GRID Fund; Trusted Data Fund.

Digital Competence Fund; Data and Digital Rights Fund; personal fund AI-laboratory.

R01, R02, R06, R07, R08, R09, R11, R17, R18, R19

Balance of data, computing power, models AI, cyber risks and social impact.

N15

Finance, Smart Money and EFS

Share, reserve, investment, clearing and stabilization funds.

Personal capital; life reserve fund; educational and hereditary funds.

R02, R03, R05, R06, R07, R08, R10, R16, R17, R18

Live financial balance: capital, liquidity, liabilities, goals, effects and risks.

N16

Other property rights, shares, trusts and cooperation

cooperative share fund; common property fund; trust and cooperation fund.

Family trust contour; birth fund; personal participation rights fund.

R01, R02, R03, R04, R05, R10, R16, R18

Balance of rights: property, management, use, income, risk and continuity.

N17

Security, risks and mobilization complexes

Security Fund; contingency fund; fund for mobilization complexes and rehabilitation.

Personal emergency reserve; family insurance fund; personal protection fund.

R06, R07, R09, R10, R16, R17, R18

Balance risks, reserves, critical dependencies, readiness and recovery time.

N18

International Cooperation and the Assembly of the Peoples of the World

International Cooperation Fund; Public Diplomacy Fund; Assembly Fund.

Name Fund of the Ambassador of Peace; Fund of Cultural Exchange; Fund of Diaspora.

R01, R02, R04, R08, R09, R10, R15, R17, R18

Balance the contributions of peoples, joint projects, cultural exchange, commitments and benefit sharing.

N19

Space, Spaceports and Galactic Culture

Space infrastructure fund; fund of spacecraft and spaceports; fund of Galactic Culture.

Name Space Fund; Foundation for Human Training; Gagarin Start Heritage Fund.

R02, R04, R05, R09, R10, R11, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19

Balance missions, apparatus, infrastructure, risks, knowledge, international contributions and cultural impact.

4. Passports 19 destinations

N01 State Design and 19 Balance Sheets

Mission: To link goals, resources, documents, funds and results into a single planning and design system.

Cooperative Funds: System Development Fund; Fund of Standards and Registers; Interdepartmental Project Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Civil Initiative Fund; State Designer's name fund.

Main registries: R02, R08, R09, R10, R17, R18, R19

Live balance of direction: Balance of goals, resources, obligations and performance according to 19 contours.

Key indicators: The share of projects with a pass-through passport; accuracy of the plan-fact; speed of the management cycle.

Pilot example: Pilot “State Constructor” for the macroregion.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N01-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N01-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N02 People, demography and personal development

Mission: To make a person the primary subject of development and the carrier of confirmed human capital.

Cooperative funds: Human Development Fund; Demographic Fund; Talent Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Personal development fund; fund of life reserve; personal trajectory fund.

Main registries: R01, R02, R05, R12, R13, R17, R19

Live Balance Direction: Personal Live Balance: Health, Competence, Income, Assets, Contributions and Risks.

Key indicators: increase in healthy life expectancy; employment; increase in competencies and income.

Pilot example: Personal development account with education funding and prevention.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N02-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N02-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N03 Family, communities and social programmes

Mission: Strengthen family, mutual aid, local communities and targeted social support.

Cooperative Funds: Social Fund; Mutual Fund; Family Initiatives Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Family fund; birth fund; fund of children and future generations.

Main registries: R01, R02, R03, R13, R16, R17

Living Balance Direction: Balancing Family Commitments, Reserves, Housing, Education and Social Sustainability.

Key indicators: Poverty reduction; accessibility of services; sustainability of the family budget.

Pilot example: Cooperative program of family housing and elder care.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N03-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N03-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N04 Health, rehabilitation and longevity

Mission: To shift funding from treatment to prevention, rehabilitation and health preservation.

Cooperative funds: Health Fund; Rehabilitation Fund; Medical Technology Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Personal health fund; family medical reserve; personal fund of the clinic or school.

Main registries: R02, R05, R09, R11, R12, R13, R16, R17

Live balance: balance of health, access to care, prevention, costs and outcomes.

Key indicators: Reduction of preventable mortality; terms of rehabilitation; availability of diagnostics.

Pilot example: Foundation for Continuous Rehabilitation of Participants and Families.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N04-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N04-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N05 Education, Personnel and Cities of Knowledge

Mission: Finance lifelong learning, workforce training for the New Order and knowledge infrastructure.

Cooperative funds: Education Fund; Personnel Reserve Fund; City of Knowledge Fund.

Personal and nominal funds: Personal educational fund; family fund of training; nominal scholarship.

Main registries: R02, R09, R11, R12, R13, R15, R17

Live balance of the direction: Balance of competencies, educational results, personnel demand and availability of training.

Key indicators: Employment; confirmed competencies; number of project educational programs.

Pilot example: Name fund of the engineering school at the production complex.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N05-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N05-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N06 Science, R&D and intellectual rights

Mission: To create a continuous investment cycle: research - RID - evaluation - implementation - income - new R&D.

Cooperative funds: Innovative Development Fund; Research and Development Fund; Scientific Infrastructure Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Name fund of scientist; fund of author and inventor; fund of scientific school.

Main registries: R04, R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R11, R17, R18

Live balance of direction: Balance of costs and revenues for RID/OIS, licenses, implementation and technological effect.

Key indicators: RID share in assets; license income; period from development to implementation.

Pilot example: RID Foundation with income distribution between the author, research institute and production.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N06-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N06-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N07 Spiritual Culture and the Great Heritage of Ancestors

Mission: To preserve and transmit the languages, traditions, works, archives and spiritual values of peoples.

Cooperative funds: Heritage Fund; Spiritual Culture Fund; Language and Traditional Knowledge Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Family fund; cultural fund; heritage keeper fund.

Main registries: R01, R04, R05, R09, R11, R15, R17, R18

Live Balance: Balancing Preservation, Accessibility, Rights, Funding, and Cultural Impact.

Key indicators: Digitized and restored objects; programs of transfer; coverage of youth.

Pilot example: The archive fund and the school of traditional art of the people.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N07-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N07-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N08 Industry, Materials Science and Engineering

Mission: To provide new industrialization, modernization of production and a full cycle of materials and machines.

Cooperative Funds: Production Fund; Modernization Fund; Materials Science and Robotics Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Name engineering fund; personal fund of production qualification; cooperative share fund participations.

Main registries: R03, R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R11, R17, R18

Live balance of the direction: Balance of capacities, equipment, materials, orders, personnel, cost and modernization.

Key indicators: Capacity utilization; productivity; share of domestic technologies; wear.

Pilot example: Foundation for the renewal of the machine park due to the depreciation and innovative contours.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N08-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N08-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N09 Energy, tariffs and carbon units

Mission: To provide affordable energy, tariff predictability, technological renewal and environmental responsibility.

Cooperative funds: Energy Fund; Tariff Stabilization Fund; Energy Efficiency Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Energy Efficiency Fund at home; personal energy reserve; personal technology fund.

Main registries: R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R11, R14, R17

Live balance of direction: Energy balance, tariff balance, balance of generation, networks, consumption and emissions.

Key indicators: Cost of energy; losses; reliability; energy intensity; recovery effect.

Pilot example: Cooperative microgeneration with the distribution of savings into personal funds.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N09-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N09-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N10 Agriculture, food and water

Mission: To guarantee food and water security through cooperation, manufacturability and land restoration.

Cooperative Funds: Agrarian Fund; Food Security Fund; Water Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Family farm fund; land and crop fund; personal water reserve.

Main registries: R03, R04, R05, R09, R10, R12, R14, R16, R17

Live balance of direction: balance of land, water, seeds, production, stocks, logistics and consumption.

Key indicators: self-sufficiency; food loss; fertility; water capacity; income of co-operators.

Pilot example: Territorial agricultural cooperative with soil restoration fund.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N10-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N10-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N11 Nature, biosphere, biocenoses and climate

Mission: To make natural capital an object of accounting, restoration and intergenerational responsibility.

Cooperative Funds: Biosphere Restoration Fund; Climate Fund; Biocenous Monitoring Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Fund of the custodian of the territory; personal ecological fund; family natural fund.

Main registries: R04, R05, R09, R10, R14, R16, R17, R18, R19

Living balance of direction: Balance of the Biosphere: atmosphere, water, soil, species, man, technogenic load and recovery.

Key indicators: Equilibrium index; area of recovery; water/air quality; reduction of damage.

Pilot example: A river basin fund with sensors and targeted recovery funding.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N11-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N11-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N12 Construction, housing and urban infrastructure

Mission: To link urban development, affordable housing, infrastructure and environmental quality with long-term funds.

Cooperative Funds: Housing Cooperative Fund; Infrastructure Fund; Urban Development Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Personal housing fund; family savings fund; personal fund of public space.

Main registries: R01, R03, R04, R05, R06, R09, R10, R13, R17

Living balance of the direction: the balance of housing, land, infrastructure, life cycle cost and quality of the urban environment.

Key indicators: affordability of housing; construction time; cost of operation; environment index.

Pilot example: cooperative share fund quarters with the return of part of the effect to residents.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N12-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N12-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N13 Transport, logistics and development corridors

Mission: To finance the connected transport system and interregional cooperation on a full life cycle.

Cooperative Funds: Transport Fund; Development Corridor Fund; Logistics Reserve.

Personal and personal funds: Mobility Fund; name of engineering and transport fund; cooperative share fund nodes.

Main registries: R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R17, R18

Live balance of direction: Balance of passenger flows, cargoes, capacities, tariffs, terms and infrastructure wear.

Key indicators: Delivery time; cost; capacity; security.

Pilot example: Interregional fund of transport and industrial corridor.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N13-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N13-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N14 Digital platforms, AI, GRID and data

Mission: To create a sovereign computing and information circuit for registries, analytics and fund management.

Cooperative funds: Digital Infrastructure Fund; Computational Grid Fund; Trusted Data Fund.

Personal and personal funds: Digital Competence Fund; Data and Digital Rights Fund; personal fund AI-laboratory.

Main registries: R01, R02, R06, R07, R08, R09, R11, R17, R18, R19

Live balance of direction: Balance of data, computing power, models AI, cyber risks and social impact.

Key indicators: Availability of capacities; data quality; share of domestic software; incidents.

Pilot example: A single operator of the Meta-Registry of funds on a distributed grid.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N14-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N14-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N15 Finance, Smart Money and EFS

Mission: To transfer finance from the mode of money movement to the mode of managing target flows and results.

Cooperative funds: Share, reserve, investment, clearing and stabilization funds.

Personal and personal funds: Personal capital; fund of life reserve; educational and hereditary funds.

Main registries: R02, R03, R05, R06, R07, R08, R10, R16, R17, R18

Live Balance Direction: Live Finance Balance: Capital, Liquidity, Commitments, Goals, Effects, and Risks.

Key indicators: Target use; cost of capital; sustainability; share of long-term investments.

Pilot example: Smart money with limited purpose and automatic plan-fact control.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N15-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N15-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N16 Other property rights, shares, trusts and cooperation

Mission: To create a transparent architecture of collective ownership, management and inheritance of assets.

Cooperative funds: cooperative share fund; common property fund; trust and cooperation fund.

Personal and personal funds: Family trust contour; birth fund; personal participation rights fund.

Main registries: R01, R02, R03, R04, R05, R10, R16, R18

Live Balance: Balance of Rights: Property, Management, Use, Income, Risk and Succession.

Key indicators: Transparency of beneficiaries; protection of rights; disputes; share of collective projects.

Pilot example: Co-ownership Fund production complex with digital passport rights.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N16-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N16-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N17 Security, risks and mobilization complexes

Mission: To ensure the sustainability of funds, projects, people, data and infrastructure in times of crisis.

Cooperative Funds: Security Fund; Reserve Fund; Fund mobilization complexes and recovery.

Personal and personal funds: Personal emergency reserve; family insurance fund; personal protection fund.

Main registries: R06, R07, R09, R10, R16, R17, R18

Live balance of direction: balance of risks, reserves, critical dependencies, readiness and recovery time.

Key indicators: RTO/RPO; reserve coverage; number of prevented violations; sustainability of supplies.

Pilot example: Seven contours SPECZASHCHITA for the fund and its supply chain.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N17-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N17-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N18 International Cooperation and Assembly of the Peoples of the World

Mission: To unite the funds of peoples, cultural missions and international projects on the principles of equality and mutual benefit.

Cooperative Funds: International Cooperation Fund; Public Diplomacy Fund; Assembly Fund.

Personal and personal funds: the Ambassador of Peace Fund; Fund of Cultural Exchange; Fund of Diaspora.

Main registries: R01, R02, R04, R08, R09, R10, R15, R17, R18

Live Balance Direction: Balancing peoples' contributions, joint projects, cultural exchange, commitments and benefit sharing.

Key indicators: Number of joint programs; participation of peoples; amount of co-financing; index of connectedness.

Pilot example: Foundation for Language Preservation and Crafts Development with International Market.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N18-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N18-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

N19 Spaceports and Galactic Culture

Mission: To create a long-term stock contour of the open space program and the cultural presence of mankind in space.

Cooperative funds: Space infrastructure fund; fund of spacecraft and spaceports; fund of Galactic Culture.

Personal and personal funds: Name Space Fund; Human Training Fund; Gagarin Start Heritage Fund.

Main registries: R02, R04, R05, R09, R10, R11, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19

Live Balance: Balance missions, vehicles, infrastructure, risks, knowledge, international contributions and cultural impact.

Key indicators: readiness of technologies; mission cost; reusability; international cooperation.

Pilot example: Baikonur and Gagarin Launch Foundation in the open space program.

Fund code: FUND:NU-N19-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID]

Operation code: TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N19-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]-[STATUS]

5. Communication mechanism for personal and cooperative funds

1. Formation of personal capital

Income, labor contribution, RID, property, right to participate, inheritance or voluntary contribution are recorded in the personal / name fund.

2. Selection of purpose and project

The owner of the fund voluntarily chooses a cooperative or project outline. The assignment is fixed with MSK-code and limit.

3. Registration of the right

The registers R03-R05 reflect shares, shares, right of income, right of management, term, limitations and continuity.

4. Financing

Funds pass through R06-R10; preliminary control checks the contract, plan, limit, counterparty and risks.

5. Performance and Live Balance

The project reflects costs, assets, liabilities and registry effects R07, R09, R14–R17.

6. Distribution of results

According to the approved formula, the result is directed to the return of capital, income of participants, reserve, development, social tasks, nature, authors and future generations.

7. Continuity

The rights of a personal and personal fund are transferred according to the passport of the fund, the law and the will of the founder.

6. The Foundation's single passport

id and type of fund;

founder, participants and beneficiaries;

Mission, direction N01-N19 and MSK codes;

Legal form, jurisdiction and set of rights;

composition of assets and independent evaluation;

sources of income and admissible expenses;

Rules of management, voting and conflict of interest;

reserve, insurance and risk level;

formula of distribution of the result;

Inheritance, succession and termination;

indicators of Live Balance;

disclosure, audit and SPECZASHCHITA.

7. Live Balance and 19 related balances

Each direction has its own balance sheet, but all balances use a single core: plan, sources, assets, liabilities, real flows, nominal flows, live effects, risks, reserves and management result. The code is formed by person, fund, project, cooperative, territory, industry and state.

financial and monetary balance;

investment and stock balance;

production and material balance;

balance of RID/OIC and knowledge;

balance of people, personnel and competencies;

social, family and medical balance;

balance of spiritual culture and heritage;

Balance of the biosphere and natural capital;

energy, infrastructure and transport balance;

balance of security, risks and reserves;

Balance of international cooperation;

the balance of time, stages and cycles KIN.

8. System Management

Organ

Function

Fund System Council

Approves the standard, policy, directions, restrictions and rules of consolidation.

The Accounting Group

Leads the Meta-Register, Live Balance, wiring methodology, plan-fact and reporting.

Scientific and Expert Council

Validates assessment methods, indicators and effects.

Funds operator

Performs calculations and administration within the legal regime.

Directions tips N01-N19

They form project portfolios and industry standards.

The Council of Participants and Rights Holders

Protects the rights of co-operators, authors, families, peoples and beneficiaries.

SPECZASHCHITA

Provides legal, organizational, technological, informational, financial, physical and cultural and ethical protection contours.

Independent verification

Conducts audits of assets, data, results, risks and compliance with goals.

9. Principles of security and legal feasibility

voluntary participation and inadmissibility of hidden alienation of property;

separate accounting of personal, cooperative, project and reserve funds;

identification of beneficiaries, verification of the origin of assets and compliance with AML/KYC;

legal qualifications of unit, trust, hereditary and digital structures in each jurisdiction;

independent valuation of significant assets and RID/OIC;

Four Eyes and Multilateral Signature for Critical Operations

immutable event log, backup and access management;

AI is used for analysis and warning, but a legally significant decision is made by an authorized person.

10. Pilot road map

Timeframe

Actions

Benchmark

0–30 days

Approval of classifiers R01-R19 and N01-N19; template of the fund's passport; legal analysis; formation of the Accounting Group.

Passport, registry, balance and pilot report

31–90 days

Launch of the Metareist MVP; personal, family, name and share pilots; Live Balance; preliminary control.

Passport, registry, balance and pilot report

3–6 months

Connecting three industries and two territories; RID funds, production, education, nature and social support.

Passport, registry, balance and pilot report

6–12 months

Deployment of all 19 direction; connection with 19 balances; independent verification and results report.

Passport, registry, balance and pilot report

12–24 months

Interregional and international cooperation, funds of peoples and replication of standards.

Passport, registry, balance and pilot report

11. Output expected

The Fund System of the New Order creates a single route for capital: from the individual, family, author and cooperative member to the project, production, territory, nature and future generations. Rights are not diluted, goals are not lost, and the result becomes measurable and distributable according to rules established in advance.

Note: The document presents a conceptual architecture. Implementation requires separate legal, tax, banking, accounting, investment and information security work.

Published files

New Order · Full published text

Fund System of the New Order: 19 Registers and 19 Directions

Source Status: Associated Author Source

A concept for integrating personal, named and cooperative funds with profiles, rights, projects, oversight and distribution of results.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/fenix/related-sources/new-order-funds-slides.html

Open on the site

Slide 1

FUND SYSTEM OF THE NEW ORDER

19 registers × 19 directions • personal, named and cooperative funds

Fund System of the New Order | 1

Slide 2

The Fund is not a wallet, but a development institute

Profile • rights • assets • objective • project • balance • oversight • distribution

PERSONAL CONTOURMANFamilyFamilyNameAuthorHeritage

METARESTRIBUYBACKSmart moneyMSK/TX-codesFund BuilderPre-control

COOPERATIVE CONTOURSPayReservesInvestmentsProductionSocial programsTerritory

Fund System of the New Order | 2

Slide 3

Summary architecture R01–R19 × N01–N19

Fund System of the New Order | 3

Slide 4

Four levels of the system

1

I. Man, family, kind and name

Personal, family, family, name, educational, medical and hereditary funds. The owner retains the rights within the framework of the law and the approved passport of the fund.

2

II. Cooperative and project

Share, reserve, investment, production, innovation, social and infrastructure funds. Resources are pooled voluntarily and directed to agreed projects.

3

III. Territory, industry and macroregion

Territory development funds and industry funds link projects, production chains, infrastructure, personnel and natural constraints.

4

IV. State and planetary contour

The system of funds is aggregated into 19 linked balance sheets, PSC, Metareister, State Constructor and Planetary Balance.

Fund System of the New Order | 4

Slide 5

I. Identity, rights and assets

Basic registers of the Metaregistry of Funds

R01

Subjects and beneficiaries

Identification of participants, roles, beneficiaries and successors

R02

Funds and digital passports

A single passport of each personal, name, cooperative and project fund

R03

Membership, Shares and Contributions

Confirmation of participation and calculation of rights to the result

R04

Property and other rights

Legal map of assets and other property rights

R05

Assets and independent valuation

Valuation, revaluation, origin and quality of assets

Fund System of the New Order | 5

Slide 6

II. Money, operations, goals and projects

Basic registers of the Metaregistry of Funds

R06

Accounts, Wallets and Smart Money

Payment and settlement contour of funds

R07

Transactions and accounting entries

Cross-cutting traceability of all operations

R08

Purposes, meanings and MSK-codes

Relationship of each operation to the mission and social outcome

R09

Projects and inter-agency programmes

Project distribution of resources in 19 directions

R10

Contracts, obligations and limits

Preliminary control of liabilities and cash gaps

Fund System of the New Order | 6

Slide 7

III. Knowledge, people, society and nature

Basic registers of the Metaregistry of Funds

R11

RID, OIC, licenses and know-how

Knowledge capitalization and continuous R & D funding

R12

Human capital and competences

Human Development Funding and Team Selection

R13

Social guarantees and services

Targeted social policies and fund commitments

R14

Natural capital and the biosphere

The relationship of funding to the balance of the biosphere

R15

Spiritual Culture and Heritage

Preservation, assessment and transmission of the great heritage of ancestors

Fund System of the New Order | 7

Slide 8

IV. Reserves, results, protection and time

Basic registers of the Metaregistry of Funds

R16

Reserves, insurance and mutual assistance

Sustainability of personal and cooperative contours

R17

Results, effects and 19 balances

Live Balance and Goal Achievement Assessment

R18

Verification, audit, risk and protection

Trust, legality, preliminary control and security

R19

KIN cycles and scheduling calendar

Synchronization of plans, transactions, reports and generational cycles

Fund System of the New Order | 8

Slide 9

Unified route of funds and rights

CONTRIBUTION / LAW

→

REGISTER

→

GOAL + MSK

→

PROJECT

→

PRECONTROL

→

RESULT

→

ALLOCATION

The distribution formula is fixed in advance: return of capital • Share of participant • Reserve • development • social tasks • Nature • Authors • Future generations

Fund System of the New Order | 9

Slide 10

N01 State Design and 19 Balance Sheets

Link goals, resources, documents, funds and results into a single planning and design system.

COOPERATION FUND, System Development Fund, Standards and Registers Fund, Interdepartmental Project Fund.

PERSONAL / NAMED CIVIL INITIATIVE FUND; the name fund of the state designer.

MAIN REGISTERS R02, R08, R09, R10, R17, R18, R19

Live Balance of Goals, Resources, Commitments and Executions on 19 contours.

KEY INDICATORS of projects with a pass-through passport; accuracy of the plan-fact; speed of the management cycle.

Pilot example: Pilot “State Constructor” for the macroregion.

FUND:NU-N01-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N01-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 10

Slide 11

N02 People, demography and personal development

To make a person the primary subject of development and the carrier of confirmed human capital.

COOPERATION FUND; demographic fund; talent fund.

PERSONAL / NAME development fund; life reserve fund; name trajectory fund.

MAIN REGISTERS R01, R02, R05, R12, R13, R17, R19

Personal Living Balance: Health, Competencies, Income, Assets, Contributions, and Risks.

KEY INDICATORS of healthy life expectancy; employment; increase in competence and income.

PILOT EXAMPLE: Personal Development Account with Education Funding and Prevention.

FUND:NU-N02-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N02-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 11

Slide 12

N03 Family, communities and social programmes

Strengthen family, mutual assistance, local communities and targeted social support.

Funds COOPERATIVESocial fund; mutual assistance fund; fund of family initiatives.

PERSONAL / NAME-SEMY FUND; birth fund; fund of children and future generations.

MAIN REGISTERS R01, R02, R03, R13, R16, R17

A LIVE BALANCEBalance of family commitments, reserves, housing, education and social sustainability.

KEY INDICATORS: poverty reduction; availability of services; sustainability of the family budget.

PILOT EXAMPLE: Cooperative program of family housing and elder care.

FUND:NU-N03-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N03-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 12

Slide 13

N04 Health, rehabilitation and longevity

Transfer funding from treatment to prevention, rehabilitation and health preservation.

COOPERATION FUND; Rehabilitation Fund; Medical Technology Fund.

PERSONAL / NAME HEALTH FUND; family medical reserve; name fund of the clinic or school.

MAIN REGISTERS R02, R05, R09, R11, R12, R13, R16, R17

Living Balance of health, availability of care, prevention, costs and outcomes of treatment.

KEY INDICATORS: reduction of preventable mortality; terms of rehabilitation; availability of diagnostics.

Pilot example: Foundation for Continuous Rehabilitation of Participants and Families.

FUND:NU-N04-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N04-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 13

Slide 14

N05 Education, Personnel and Cities of Knowledge

Finance lifelong learning, workforce training for the New Order and knowledge infrastructure.

COOPERATION FUND Education fund; personnel reserve fund; City of Knowledge fund.

PERSONAL / NAME Educational Fund; Family Training Fund; personal scholarship.

MAIN REGISTERS R02, R09, R11, R12, R13, R15, R17

LIVE BALANCEBalance of competencies, educational results, personnel demand and availability of training.

KEY INDICATORS; confirmed competencies; number of project educational programs.

PILOT EXAMPLE: Name fund of the engineering school at the production complex.

FUND:NU-N05-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N05-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 14

Slide 15

N06 Science, R&D and intellectual rights

Create a continuous investment cycle: research - RID - evaluation - implementation - income - new R&D.

COOPERATION FUND; Innovative Development Fund; Research and Development Fund; Science Infrastructure Fund.

PERSONAL / NAME SCIENTIST FUND; Fund of the author and inventor; Fund of scientific school.

MAIN REGISTERS R04, R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R11, R17, R18

LIVE BALANCEBalance of costs and revenues for RID/OIS, licenses, implementation and technological effect.

KEY INDICATOR OF RID in assets; license income; term from development to implementation.

PILOT EXAMPLE: RID Fund with income distribution between the author, research institute and production.

FUND:NU-N06-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N06-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 15

Slide 16

N07 Spiritual Culture and the Great Heritage of Ancestors

Preserve and transmit the languages, traditions, works, archives and spiritual values of peoples.

COOPERATIVE VALUE FUND; Spiritual Culture Fund; Foundation for Languages and Traditional Knowledge.

PERSONAL / NAME-EROD Fund; Name Cultural Fund; Heritage Keeper Fund.

MAIN REGISTERS R01, R04, R05, R09, R11, R15, R17, R18

The balance of safety, accessibility, rights, financing and cultural effect.

KEY INDICATORS Digitized and restored objects; programs of transfer; coverage of youth.

PILOT EXAMPLE: The archive fund and the school of traditional art of the people.

FUND:NU-N07-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N07-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 16

Slide 17

N08 Industry, Materials Science and Engineering

Provide new industrialization, modernization of production and a full cycle of materials and machines.

Production fund; modernization fund; fund of materials science and robotics.

PERSONAL / NAME Engineering Fund; personal fund of production qualification; cooperative share fund participations.

MAIN REGISTERS R03, R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R11, R17, R18

LIVE BALANCEBalance of capacities, equipment, materials, orders, personnel, cost and modernization.

KEY INDICATORSLoading capacities; productivity; share of domestic technologies; wear.

PILOT EXAMPLE: Foundation for the renewal of the machine park due to the depreciation and innovative contours.

FUND:NU-N08-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N08-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 17

Slide 18

N09 Energy, tariffs and carbon units

Ensure affordable energy, tariff predictability, technological renewal and environmental responsibility.

COOPERATIVE FUNDEnergy fund; tariff stabilization fund; energy efficiency fund.

PERSONAL / NAME Energy Efficiency Fund of the house; personal energy reserve; personal technology fund.

MAIN REGISTERS R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R11, R14, R17

LIVE BALANCE Energy balance, tariff balance, balance of generation, networks, consumption and emissions.

KEY INDICATORSEnergy cost; loss; reliability; energy intensity; recovery effect.

Pilot example: Cooperative microgeneration with the distribution of savings into personal funds.

FUND:NU-N09-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N09-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 18

Slide 19

N10 Agriculture, food and water

Guarantee food and water security through cooperation, manufacturability and land restoration.

COOPERATIVE FUNDAGRARIAN FUND; FUND FOR FOOD SECURITY; WATER FUND.

PERSONAL / NAME FAMILY FUND; Land and Crop Fund; personal water reserve.

MAIN REGISTERS R03, R04, R05, R09, R10, R12, R14, R16, R17

Living Balance of land, water, seeds, production, stocks, logistics and consumption.

KEY INDICATORS, food losses, fertility, water capacity, income of cooperatives.

PILOT EXAMPLE: Territorial agro-cooperative with soil restoration fund.

FUND:NU-N10-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N10-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 19

Slide 20

N11 Nature, biosphere, biocenoses and climate

Make natural capital an object of accounting, restoration and intergenerational responsibility.

COOPERATION FUND Biosphere Restoration Fund; Climate Fund; Biocenous Monitoring Fund.

PERSONAL / NAME-Fund of the custodian of the territory; personal ecological fund; family natural fund.

MAIN REGISTERS R04, R05, R09, R10, R14, R16, R17, R18, R19

Living Balance of the Biosphere: Atmosphere, Water, Soil, Species, Man, Man-made Load and Restoration.

KEY Equilibrium Index; Remediation Area; Water/Air Quality; Damage Reduction.

PILOT EXAMPLE: River Basin Fund with sensors and targeted recovery funding.

FUND:NU-N11-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N11-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 20

Slide 21

N12 Construction, housing and urban infrastructure

Link urban development, affordable housing, infrastructure and environmental quality with long-term funds.

Housing Cooperative Fund; Infrastructure Fund; Urban Development Fund.

PERSONAL / NAME housing stock; family savings fund; personal fund of public space.

MAIN REGISTERS R01, R03, R04, R05, R06, R09, R10, R13, R17

Living Balance of housing, land, infrastructure, cost of life cycle and quality of urban environment.

KEY INDICATORSLoading of housing; construction time; cost of operation; environment index.

PILOT EXAMPLE: cooperative share fund quarters with the return of part of the effect to residents.

FUND:NU-N12-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N12-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 21

Slide 22

N13 Transport, logistics and development corridors

To finance the connected transport system and interregional cooperation on a full life cycle.

Transport fund; development corridors fund; logistics reserve.

PERSONAL / NAMED Mobility Fund; name of engineering and transport fund; cooperative share fund knots.

MAIN REGISTERS R05, R06, R07, R09, R10, R17, R18

LIVE BALANCEBalance of flows of passengers, cargoes, capacities, tariffs, terms and infrastructure wear.

KEY INDICATORSDelivery time; cost; capacity; security.

PILOT EXAMPLE: Interregional Fund of Transport and Industrial Corridor.

FUND:NU-N13-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N13-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 22

Slide 23

N14 Digital platforms, AI, GRID and data

Create a sovereign computing and information loop for registries, analytics, and fund management.

COOPERATION FUNDDigital infrastructure fund; Computational Grid fund; Trusted Data fund.

PERSONAL / NAMED Digital Competence Fund; Data and Digital Rights Fund; Name Fund AI-laboratory.

MAIN REGISTERS R01, R02, R06, R07, R08, R09, R11, R17, R18, R19

The balance of data, computing power, models AI, cyber risks and social impact.

KEY INDICATORSCapacity; data quality; share of domestic software; incidents.

PILOT EXAMPLE: A single operator of the Meta-Register of Funds on a Distributed Grid.

FUND:NU-N14-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N14-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 23

Slide 24

N15 Finance, Smart Money and EFS

Transfer finance from the mode of money movement to the mode of managing target flows and results.

COOPERATIVE, reserve, investment, clearing and stabilization funds.

PERSONAL / NAME capital; fund of life reserve; educational and hereditary funds.

MAIN REGISTERS R02, R03, R05, R06, R07, R08, R10, R16, R17, R18

Living financial balance: capital, liquidity, liabilities, goals, effects and risks.

KEY INDICATORS Targeted use; cost of capital; sustainability; share of long-term investments.

PILOT EXAMPLE: Smart money with limited purpose and automatic plan-fact control.

FUND:NU-N15-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N15-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 24

Slide 25

N16 Other property rights, shares, trusts and cooperation

Create a transparent architecture of collective ownership, management and inheritance of assets.

COOPERATIVE FUND; common property fund; trust and cooperation fund.

PERSONAL / NAME SESME TRUST CONTROL; patrimonial fund; personal fund of participation rights.

MAIN REGISTERS R01, R02, R03, R04, R05, R10, R16, R18

The living balance of rights: property, management, use, income, risk and continuity.

Transparency of beneficiaries; protection of rights; disputes; share of collective projects.

PILOT EXAMPLE: Fund of joint ownership of a production complex with a digital passport of rights.

FUND:NU-N16-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N16-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 25

Slide 26

N17 Security, risks and mobilization complexes

Ensure the sustainability of funds, projects, people, data and infrastructure in times of crisis.

COOPERATION VALUE FUND; reserve fund; fund for mobilization complexes and rehabilitation.

PERSONAL / NAME emergency reserve; family insurance fund; personal protection fund.

MAIN REGISTERS R06, R07, R09, R10, R16, R17, R18

The balance of risks, reserves, critical dependencies, readiness and recovery time.

KEY INDICATORSRTO/RPO; reserve coverage; number of violations prevented; sustainability of supplies.

Pilot example: Seven contours SPECZASHCHITA for the fund and its supply chain.

FUND:NU-N17-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N17-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 26

Slide 27

N18 International Cooperation and Assembly of the Peoples of the World

To unite the funds of peoples, cultural missions and international projects on the principles of equality and mutual benefit.

COOPERATION FUND: International Cooperation Fund; Public Diplomacy Fund; Assembly Fund.

PERSONAL / NAMED FOUNDATION OF A PEACE AMBASSADOR; FOUNDATION OF CULTURAL EXCHANGE; FOUNDATION OF DISASPORIA.

MAIN REGISTERS R01, R02, R04, R08, R09, R10, R15, R17, R18

The balance of peoples’ contributions, joint projects, cultural exchange, obligations and distribution of benefits.

KEY INDICATORSNumber of joint programs; participation of peoples; amount of co-financing; index of coherence.

PILOT EXAMPLE: Foundation for the Preservation of Language and the Development of Crafts with International Market.

FUND:NU-N18-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N18-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 27

Slide 28

N19 Spaceports and Galactic Culture

To create a long-term stock contour of the open space program and the cultural presence of mankind in space.

COOPERATIVE Astronomical Infrastructure Fund; Fund of Apparatuses and Spaceports; Fund of Galactic Culture

PERSONAL / NAME Space Fund; Human Training Fund; Gagarin Start Heritage Fund.

MAIN REGISTERS R02, R04, R05, R09, R10, R11, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19

LIVE BALANCESBalance of missions, apparatus, infrastructure, risks, knowledge, international contributions and cultural impact.

KEY INDICATORY of technologies; mission cost; reusability; international cooperation.

PILOT EXAMPLE: The Baikonur and Gagarin Launch Foundation in the Open Space Program.

FUND:NU-N19-[LEVEL]-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[ID] | TX:NU-[DATE]-[FUND]-N19-[Rxx]-[MSK]-[KIN]

Fund System of the New Order | 28

Slide 29

Digital passport of the Fund

• ID and fund type

• Founder, participants, beneficiaries

• Mission, N-code and MSK-codes

• Legal form and set of rights

• Assets and independent valuation

• Sources, costs and limits

• Management and conflict of interest

• Reserve, insurance and risk

• Formula for the distribution of the result

• Inheritance and succession

• Live Balance Indicators

• Audit, Disclosure and SPECZASHCHITA

Fund System of the New Order | 29

Slide 30

Management, verification and protection

Fund System Council

Approves the standard, policy, directions, restrictions and rules of consolidation.

The Accounting Group

Leads the Meta-Register, Live Balance, wiring methodology, plan-fact and reporting.

Scientific and Expert Council

Validates assessment methods, indicators and effects.

Funds operator

Performs calculations and administration within the legal regime.

Directions tips N01-N19

They form project portfolios and industry standards.

The Council of Participants and Rights Holders

Protects the rights of co-operators, authors, families, peoples and beneficiaries.

SPECZASHCHITA

Provides legal, organizational, technological, informational, financial, physical and cultural and ethical protection contours.

Independent verification

Conducts audits of assets, data, results, risks and compliance with goals.

Fund System of the New Order | 30

Slide 31

19 directions → 19 interconnected balances

SINGLE NUCLEARSSourcesActivitiesLiabilitiesReal streamsNominal flowsLive effectsRisksReserves

AGGREGATIONManFundProjectCooperativeTerritoryIndustryMacroregionStatePlanet

ManagementMetareisterLiving BalanceSmart MoneyAccounting GroupESPRESSState DesignerSPEZZAZITA

Fund System of the New Order | 31

Slide 32

Pilot's road map

0–30 days

Approval of classifiers R01-R19 and N01-N19; template of the fund's passport; legal analysis; formation of the Accounting Group.

31–90 days

Launch of the Metareist MVP; personal, family, name and share pilots; Live Balance; preliminary control.

3–6 months

Connecting three industries and two territories; RID funds, production, education, nature and social support.

6–12 months

Deployment of all 19 direction; connection with 19 balances; independent verification and results report.

12–24 months

Interregional and international cooperation, funds of peoples and replication of standards.

Fund System of the New Order | 32

Slide 33

FUND SYSTEM OF THE NEW ORDER

Humans retain rights and results.Cooperation receives capital for development.Territory receives projects and infrastructure.Society, nature and future generations receive a measurable share of benefits.

19 registers × 19 directions × Living Balance = an interconnected financial architecture of the New Order

Fund System of the New Order | 33

Published files

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

SPECZASHCHITA: structure and participation

Public texts about the cooperative, its tasks and governing bodies, membership, enquiries, contacts, contributions and payments. A useful starting point before exploring programmes and documents.

Materials: 18 · with full text: 18 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

About cooperative and site · Full published text

One goal. A worthy future.

Source status: Public page

NPK “NPO ‘SPECZASHCHITA’” is a consumer cooperative: 25 member programs across 19 development sub-goals, one environmental program (ECO-PPA), 17 regulations and an open documentary base.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/

Open on the site

SPECZASHCHITA · A cooperative of shared purpose

One purpose.
A future of dignity.

Bringing knowledge, technology and initiative together for people, nature and our shared future.

19
directions for development
25
member programs
1
shared purpose — creating together

SFERA — A world without borders

A clear path to every section

The whole system at a glance

Texts, documents, maps, platforms and print editions.

ORION22:22 · Unified Structure

White Paper
connects everything.

Meanings, knowledge, documents, reports and registers in one clear system.

Open the unified system White Paper of Shared Destiny · version 1.0

FENIX · Knowledge and Energy

A city that learns

Primary documents and presentations, a conceptual masterplan, natural and technical systems, and the SUR architecture.

Explore the FENIX collection ↗

Cinema that connects ideas

Six themes
for a shared future

Choose an idea to explore the films and directions connected with it.

Featured films

Discover the vision.
Sense the scale.

All films
Skip the ECO-PPA presentation
  1. Flagship program

    ECO-PPA: a joint development program

    From a contribution —
    to a verifiable result

    ECO-PPA brings members' developments, property, rights and expertise into projects governed by shared rules. Every contribution is verified and every result is measured.

    19
    directions
    25
    programs
    ∞
    one methodology
  2. 02 · Contribution and verification

    Only a documented asset enters the shared framework

    The rights holder, contributed asset and technical description are verified before entry into the program. Every decision retains its source, date and version.

    ASSET PASSPORT
    Object
    Technology unit
    Right
    Verified
    Version
    03 / 08.2026
    Evidence level
    1. D0
    2. D1
    3. D2
    4. D3
    5. D4
    6. D5

    The level applies to an individual claim, not to the project as a whole.

  3. 03 · Shared framework

    One framework — six domain modules

    Property, rights, developments and expertise are connected through shared rules for accounting, implementation and result verification.

    ECO-PPA shared rules

    • EN Energy
    • WW Water and runoff
    • CE Closed Cycle
    • ER Emissions
    • AG Agro
    • LR Land and soil
  4. 04 · Result

    From initiative to a measurable result

    Every stage leaves a documentary trail. This makes it possible to define participation in advance and verify exactly what was created.

    1. 01 Contribution
    2. 02 Verification
    3. 03 Program
    4. 04 Implementation
    5. 05 Measurement
    6. 06 Distribution

    A contribution becomes part of a shared program with clear rules and a verifiable result.

The ECO-PPA architecture

From a shared goal to a programme and a document

The system has four levels: 19 areas define the tasks, programmes bring participants together, materials explain the solutions, and primary documents substantiate their basis.

ECO-PPA 19 directions — one program

Unity in diversity

Every colour is a direction.
Together, one system.

Choose a segment to explore its purpose, programs and source documents.

All directions

Direction program material primary document

Geography

Geography of Programs and Initiatives

Choose a location to view related programmes and their status.

Eurasia RUSSIA INDIA Black Sea
Natural Earth

Choose a territory

Regional administrative reference point

Moscow Region

The points mark areas listed in the register, not exact site addresses. India is an area of analysis and partnership.

About the data and site visits

Why we publish this

Every claim carries a confirmation level of D0–D5 — from a statement to recognition under approved rules. The level is assigned to the claim, not to the project as a whole.

Roadmap to 2050

The White Paper sets a strategic planning horizon of 2026–2050 and the transition sequence: pilot → contract → production → settlement.

See the program in person

Kovcheg is a demonstration site for the environmental track and biocenosis.

Request a visit

Participation in the cooperative

Choose how to join the shared framework

You can become a cooperative member or propose your own contribution: a development, property, a right or expertise. Participation terms are agreed before joint work begins.

01 To participate in programs

Become a cooperative member

Read the joining procedure, participant requirements and the documents needed to complete the formalities.

Entry procedure
02 For authors of initiatives

Propose a contribution or project

Describe your initiative, expected outcome and available resources. The team will identify the relevant area and the next step.

Submit a Request

Defined before participation begins

  • 01 Contributions and rights
  • 02 Role and responsibility
  • 03 Order of distribution of results

Repeated catalog cards are not reproduced here. All materials, programs, directions and texts of films are fully represented in their thematic packages of the printed library.

About cooperative and site · Full published text

About

Source status: Public page

About the structure of SPECZASHCHITA: mission, tasks and principles of the socio-legal system of protection, security and control. EQUILIBRUM ecosystem safety circuit.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/about

Open on the site

Science · Programs · Protection

About

SPECZASHCHITA is a research and production association organised as a non-profit consumer cooperative. We develop the Theory of Security and turn it into working mechanisms: targeted programmes, projects and protection for every participant.

Mission

Security is what unites us

Security is a state in which a person or entity is not threatened by danger, is protected against it, and has measures in place in case it arises. We study security as a system, from the global level to the everyday protection of a cooperative member, and build mechanisms in which each participant combines resources, expertise and responsibility with others.

Research

Development of the Theory of Security: a unified definition, aspects (legal, economic, informational, social, environmental) and principles of security.

Concepts and materials in the library →

Expertise and recommendations

Analysis of risks, documents and projects; preparation of recommendations and positions based on the association methodology.

Regulations in the library →

Targeted programs

Cooperative mutual welfare, affordable housing, food security, and veterans support programs.

Programs in the library →

Projects and technologies

Project initiatives: territorial development programs, unmanned systems, university educational project.

Project materials in the library →

Participant protection

Operational outline: appeals, legal qualifications, route of action, support - according to regulations and with a written result.

Procedure on this page →

Principles

What is the defense based on?

  • 01

    Documentation

    The appeal, decision, program and result are recorded in a clear procedure, and are not based on verbal promises.

  • 02

    Legal framework

    SPECZASHCHITA does not replace government agencies or legal assistance. We help determine the legal route and assemble a position.

  • 03

    Profile review

    Questions are categorized by type, risk and document. Difficult cases are brought to the specialized group or Council.

  • 04

    Cooperation

    The cooperative unites participants around common goals: protection, expertise, organizational support and mutual support.

Management

Who makes the decisions

Decisions go through the cooperative’s governing bodies and are recorded in minutes; their list is publicly available in the document library.

01

General Meeting of Cooperative Members

The highest management body: adopts the Charter, key decisions and approves areas of work.

02

Council

The collective governing body between General Meetings: admits cooperative members, approves programmes and records decisions in minutes.

03

Management Board

Executive body: conducts current work, is responsible for the implementation of decisions. Chairman of the Board - Alexander Ivanovich Berdnikov.

04

Appraisal Commission

Evaluates membership share contributions in kind as decided by the Board.

Roles of participation

How does participation work?

A cooperative is a form of uniting participants around common goals. Each role has its own rules and documents.

Cooperative member

Basic status. Participates in management through the General Meeting, makes contributions, can enter targeted programs and apply for protection according to the rules of the cooperative.

Member of a cooperative plot

Works as part of a site - by direction, territory or project. The site has its own meeting, chairman and position.

targeted program participant

Registers in a specific program, accepts its rules and receives a result secured by the program’s regulations.

Tasks

What are we doing

Seven areas of work cover the entire circuit: from legal protection to risk monitoring.

Legal route Public control Project security Cooperative sites Social protection Expert check Risk monitoring

About cooperative and site · Full published text

Create an account first

Source status: Public page

A secure process for creating an account and submitting a preliminary enquiry to the SPECZASHCHITA cooperative.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/join

Open on the site

A secure first step

Create an account first

Enter your name and email address, create and repeat a password, accept the Terms of Use, confirm that you have read the Policy, and separately consent to personal data processing. Then confirm your address using the link in the email.

The form checks for approved document versions before submitting any data. Check document status .

Process

Three clear steps

  1. 01
    Registration

    Name, email address, password and password confirmation. Here you also accept the Terms, read the Policy, and separately consent to personal data processing using a dedicated checkbox.

  2. 02
    Email confirmation

    Follow the link in the service email. You cannot sign in until the address is confirmed.

  3. 03
    Member Account

    After signing in, you will see the prepared sections. KYC data and admission documents will be requested later in a separate protected stage.

About cooperative and site · Full published text

Submit a Request

Source status: Public page

Submit an appeal to SPECZASHCHITA: type of appeal, region, description of the situation, documents. The application goes to the specialized group in the direction of defense.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/appeal

Open on the site

Where protection is needed, a system is needed

Submit a Request

Describe the situation. Your application will reach the relevant specialist group; we will carry out a legal assessment and determine the next steps.

Name or organization
Request type
Region
Email
Phone (optional)
Describe the situation
Documents (optional) Attach files (PDF, JPG, up to 10 MB)
I provide separate consent to personal data processing for the review of my request. Personal Data Processing Policy is available separately.

After the fields are validated, your email application will open. Attach the files to the message manually.

Legal disclaimer

  • This website does not replace formal legal advice. A request is preliminary and does not by itself create obligations for either party.
  • Descriptions of legal assistance are general. Specific steps are determined after the specialist group reviews the matter.
  • Personal data is processed in accordance with the Personal Data Processing Policy and the relevant consent.

About cooperative and site · Full published text

Official contacts

Source status: Public page

Official contacts of SPECZASHCHITA: email from the domain, phone numbers, address, registration procedure, what to attach to the first letter and legal disclaimer.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/contacts

Open on the site

Public Verifiability

Official contacts

For enquiries, document requests, programme participation and project reviews, use the official email address, telephone numbers and advance appointments.

Phone +7 (921) 307-67-01
Address Room 11, Building 2, 22 Stanislavskogo Street, Moscow 109004, Russia
Appointments Requests accepted by appointment
Authorized officer Alexander Ivanovich Berdnikov — Chairman of the Management Board

Application via the website is preliminary. The specific procedure is determined after checking the documents and does not replace emergency services, government agencies, court or legal assistance.

How to make an appointment

Write to the official email with the subject of the appeal and a brief description of the situation. The response will suggest the procedure for further communication.

What to include in your first email

  • Full name or organization
  • question type
  • region
  • brief chronology
  • documents or links
  • contact for feedback

Request processing timeframes

  • Acknowledgement of receipt — within one business day
  • Initial review and recommended next steps — within three business days
  • Referral to a specialist group or the Council — by the next meeting

The deadlines describe the procedure for processing the appeal and are not a guarantee of the outcome of the consideration.

Routing

Questions for initial contact

In the first letter, indicate the essence of the issue, region, chronology of events and attach documents that you already have.

application for the program request for documents partnership project verification clarifying the status of the application

About cooperative and site · Full published text

Cooperative details

Source status: Public page

Official details of NPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA, contact information and the procedure for verifying payment details.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/requisites

Open on the site

Public Verification

Cooperative details

Information current as of 10 July 2026

Organization Details

Full name
Non-Profit Consumer Cooperative “Scientific and Production Association ‘SPECZASHCHITA’”
Abbreviated Name
NPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA
Primary State Registration Number (OGRN)
1207700383087
INN / KPP
9709066128 / 770901001
Legal Form
Non-profit consumer cooperative
Registered Address
Room 11, Building 2, 22 Stanislavskogo Street, Moscow 109004, Russia
Chief Executive
Alexander Ivanovich Berdnikov, Chairman of the Management Board

Contacts

Email: office@speczashchita.com
Phone: +7 (921) 307-67-01
Website: speczashchita.com

Payment details

Online payments use the details linked to the individual payment assessment and the acquiring bank agreement. Do not transfer contributions using details from old invoices, correspondence or unofficial messages.

Until acquiring is launched, the current bank account for a particular contribution is specified in the invoice issued by the cooperative. Details of the ALFA-BANK JSC account used for acquiring will be published after written confirmation by the accounting department and the bank.

How to Verify the Information

OGRN and INN can be checked through the Russian Federal Tax Service. Before paying, verify the recipient, payment assessment number, contribution type, amount and programme. If the details differ, do not pay the assessment; use the official contact details to enquire.

Public Document Library · Payment Rules

About cooperative and site · Full published text

Payment of contributions

Source status: Public page

Procedure for paying admission, share and earmarked contributions to Non-Profit Consumer Cooperative “Scientific and Production Association ‘SPECZASHCHITA’” (NPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA): basis, amount, confirmation, security and accounting.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/payment

Open on the site

Cooperative Payments

Payment of contributions

Version 1.0 July 10, 2026

Online payment is not yet launched. The page describes the proposed acquiring model. The payment button will be enabled after secure data exchange is verified and the acquiring bank is activated.

Payments Accepted Through the Website

Non-Profit Consumer Cooperative “Scientific and Production Association ‘SPECZASHCHITA’” (NPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA) plans to accept only monetary cooperative contributions through a secure bank payment page: admission, share and earmarked contributions. This is not payment for goods or consumer services and is not an unrestricted transfer of funds.

Payment is available only against an individual payment assessment issued by the cooperative. It states in advance the payer, contribution type, basis, amount in roubles, programme or project where applicable, and refund conditions.

Before activation, the cooperative provides the bank with its Charter, contribution rules and payment scenarios and obtains written confirmation that the acquiring agreement permits the acceptance of cooperative contributions. Contributions must not be disguised as payment for services.

Types of Payment

Admission contribution

A monetary contribution to cover admission-related costs. It is not part of the cooperative share fund. After admission to the cooperative is complete, the admission contribution is non-refundable; exceptions for rejected admission, erroneous or duplicate payments are specified in the refund rules.

Share contribution

A cooperative member’s contribution of property to the cooperative share fund. Only monetary contributions are accepted through acquiring. A non-cash share contribution is documented separately through an application, valuation, decision and transfer-and-acceptance certificate.

Earmarked contribution or earmarked share contribution

An earmarked contribution to a specific approved targeted program or cooperative project. Before payment, the payer receives the program rules, the designated use of funds, the amount, and a statement of whether the contribution is refundable or non-refundable.

Payment procedure

  1. The applicant submits an application for membership or the cooperative member submits an application to participate in the program, contribute an additional share or initiate a project.
  2. The competent authority of the cooperative reviews the application and issues a decision, agreement or confirmation of participation when required.
  3. The cooperative creates an individual accrual with a unique number, exact amount and purpose.
  4. The payer checks the full personal or organization name, contribution type, programme, amount and refund rules.
  5. Payment is made on a secure bank page. Arbitrary changes in the amount and purpose are not allowed.
  6. After confirmation by the bank, the contribution is reflected in the personal account of the cooperative member or applicant and a confirming document is generated.

Payment by itself does not mean automatic admission to the cooperative or automatic inclusion in the program. Membership requires an application, a decision of the Council and the fulfillment of the conditions stipulated by the Charter for entrance and share contributions.

Information Displayed Before Payment

  • unique accrual number and its validity period;
  • Full name or name of the payer and his identifier in the register;
  • contribution type, without combining several bases into one line item;
  • exact amount and currency - Russian rubles;
  • the name and code of the targeted program or project;
  • link to the current program regulations;
  • an indication of whether the earmarked contribution is refundable or non-refundable;
  • links to these rules and the refund procedure.

Payment from a third party card is not allowed by default. If such payment is necessary, the cooperative first identifies the payer and documents for whom and on what basis he contributes the funds.

Bank Card Security

The planned acquiring bank is JSC ALFA-BANK. After concluding and activating the agreement, card details will be entered only on the bank’s secure payment page using the transaction confirmation methods provided by the bank.

The card number, expiration date and security code are not entered and are not stored on the cooperative server. The site receives from the bank only the technical status of the transaction, payment ID, amount and information necessary to reconcile the accrual.

Confirmation and Accounting

After a successful transaction, the payer is shown the payment number and receives confirmation through the specified channel. The cooperative records the receipt separately by contribution type and, for an earmarked contribution, by the relevant programme.

If the payment is a cooperative contribution and is unrelated to the sale of goods, work or services, it is documented by a contribution receipt and an entry in the personal account. If the payment’s actual basis is determined to be payment for goods, work or services, the cooperative will use cash-register equipment and issue a fiscal receipt in the prescribed manner.

Payment Support

Before payment and for reconciliation questions: office@speczashchita.com , +7 (921) 307-67-01. In your request, please indicate the accrual number and bank transaction number; Full card details cannot be provided.

Cooperative Contribution Rules · Refunds and Erroneous Payments · Cooperative details

About cooperative and site · Full published text

Cooperative Contribution Rules

Source status: Public page

Rules governing admission contributions, share contributions, earmarked contributions and earmarked share contributions at Non-Profit Consumer Cooperative “Scientific and Production Association ‘SPECZASHCHITA’” (NPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA), participation in programmes and documentation of non-cash share contributions.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/contributions

Open on the site

Membership and Programs

Cooperative Contribution Rules

Version 1.0 July 10, 2026

These rules disclose the procedure for payments on the site and do not replace the Charter, decision of the competent authority, regulations of a specific program, individual application or agreement. In case of discrepancy, signed and approved documents are used.

General Rules

The cooperative accepts contributions only where there is a documented basis. The type, amount, and payment purpose must match the individual assessment. Funds are accounted for separately by cooperative member, contribution type, and targeted program.

A public description of the program on the website allows you to get acquainted with the direction of work, but does not in itself create an obligation for the cooperative to accept money or include a visitor in the program.

Joining a cooperative

  1. A citizen or organization submits a written application for admission and the necessary information.
  2. The cooperative council considers the application in the manner and within the period established by the Charter.
  3. Following a positive decision, separate assessments are issued to the applicant for the admission contribution and share contribution, or for the prescribed portion of the share contribution.
  4. After the Board decision and fulfilment of contribution requirements, the information is entered in the register and membership is confirmed by the document specified in the Charter.

Signing the application or paying only the admission contribution does not, by itself, confirm cooperative member status. Until admission is complete, the payer remains an applicant.

Contribution to an Approved Targeted Program

  1. The cooperative member selects an active program and reviews its regulations, objectives, term, budget, and the conditions governing whether the contribution is refundable.
  2. The cooperative member submits a participation application and states the proposed level of participation if it is not established by the program documents.
  3. The cooperative confirms the possibility of participation and creates an accrual with the program code.
  4. After payment, the receipt is recorded in the cooperative member’s personal account and in a separate program account.

An earmarked contribution may not be assigned a generic payment purpose without the program name and application or assessment number. Each program must separately state whether the contribution is refundable, non-refundable, or an earmarked share contribution.

If a cooperative member initiates a new program

The phrase “I initiate the program and my share is such and such an amount” is a statement of offer, but not yet a basis for payment. The statement must describe the purpose, activities, estimated budget, deadline, form and size of the share, control procedure and expected result.

The cooperative checks the initiative’s compliance with the Charter, assesses the risks and source of funds, determines the contribution type, and approves the programme regulations or executes the necessary documents. Only then is an individual payment assessment created.

If the initiative has not been approved, the cooperative will not accept an earmarked contribution or share contribution through the website. Funds received without a documented basis must be identified and returned as an erroneous payment.

Property share contribution in non-cash form

A share contribution may be made in cash, securities, property, property rights, or other rights with monetary value. Merchant acquiring applies only to monetary contributions.

For a non-monetary contribution, at a minimum, the following must be drawn up: an application from the cooperative member, documents on the right to the asset, a description and monetary valuation, a decision to approve the valuation and acceptance of the contribution, a transfer-and-acceptance certificate and an entry on the personal account. For intellectual or other rights, the scope of transferred rights, territory, term and restrictions on use are additionally recorded.

Documents and Accounting

For each contribution, the cooperative retains the complete supporting record: an application or agreement, a decision of the competent governing body, the assessment, bank confirmation, the accounting entry, and the personal account statement. For an earmarked contribution, the program regulations and separate analytical records of the use of funds are also retained.

The payment purpose must clearly identify the cooperative member, the type of contribution, and the program. A single payment must not combine an admission contribution, share contribution, and earmarked contribution.

Important Limitations

  • The contribution is not a bank deposit, a loan to a cooperative, or the purchase of a security.
  • Depositing a share does not guarantee a fixed income, payback period or increase in the value of the share.
  • Cooperative payments are possible only if there are grounds, financial results and a decision of the competent authority.
  • Targeted funds are used within the approved program and are accounted for separately.
  • Payments by third parties, splitting of payments and discrepancies in the source of funds may require additional documents for verification under 115-FZ.

Payment procedure · Refund of contributions

About cooperative and site · Full published text

Refund of Contributions and Erroneous Payments

Source status: Public page

Procedure for refunding erroneous card payments, admission, share and earmarked contributions to Non-Profit Consumer Cooperative “Scientific and Production Association ‘SPECZASHCHITA’” (NPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA).

Source: https://speczashchita.com/refund

Open on the site

Payments and Settlements

Refund of Contributions and Erroneous Payments

Version 1.0 July 10, 2026

A card transaction refund and the return of a cooperative share are different procedures. The first corrects a payment error. The second changes the member’s property relationship with the cooperative and requires documents and a decision under the Charter or programme regulations.

Applicable Procedure

Return of the card transaction is applied when re-write-off, erroneous amount, absence of valid charge, refusal to accept before the membership occurs or inability to identify the basis of payment.

Return of the share or target contribution is made at the request of cooperative member in connection with the withdrawal, reduction of the share or the terms of the program. This is not a cancellation of the purchase and not an automatic return to the card.

Erroneous, Duplicate, or Unaccepted Payment

The payer submits an application with the payment assessment number, date, amount, transaction identifier and reason for the refund. The cooperative registers the request, reconciles the payment with the bank and communicates its decision within 10 business days after receiving sufficient information.

If the application for membership is rejected or membership has not arisen and there is no other agreed basis for offset, the received admission and share payments will be returned. Non-refundability of the admission contribution applies after the completion of admission, and not to the money of a person not accepted into the cooperative.

Admission contribution

After a person is admitted to the cooperative and the membership conditions are met, the admission contribution is not part of the cooperative share fund and is non-refundable. It may be refunded only as an erroneous, duplicate or unaccepted payment, or in another case expressly provided for by a mandatory legal rule or a cooperative decision.

Share contribution

Upon termination of membership, the return of the share is made after calculating the cooperative member's obligations in the manner and within the period established by the Charter. The Charter provides for final payment no later than six months after approval of the annual balance sheet. Debt and other documented obligations of the cooperative member to the cooperative may be deducted from the amount.

Partial reduction of share without exit is not performed with one button. The cooperative member submits an application, the cooperative checks the possibility of a reduction taking into account obligations and the program, makes a decision and formalizes a change in the personal account. If the decision is not made, the payment transaction is not cancelled.

Earmarked contribution and earmarked share contribution

Refunds depend on the contribution type and the specific programme regulations. Before payment, the assessment must specify one of these conditions: a refundable earmarked contribution, a non-refundable earmarked contribution or an earmarked share contribution.

A refundable earmarked contribution is refunded in the circumstances and within the time limits established by the program regulations, agreement, and cooperative decision. A non-refundable earmarked contribution, once duly accepted and applied to the program purpose, is not refundable except in the event of an error or where required by law. An earmarked share contribution may be returned in cash or in property under an agreed and properly documented procedure.

How to Submit an Application

The application is sent to office@speczashchita.com or at the cooperative’s registered address. State your full personal or organization name, member or applicant identifier, payment assessment number, payment date and amount, contribution type, programme, reason and requested resolution method.

Do not send the full card number, expiration date and security code. For initial reconciliation, the last four digits of the card and the bank transaction ID are sufficient. The cooperative has the right to request additional documents if necessary for identification, accounting or verification under 115-FZ.

Refund Method

A card transaction is reversed through the acquiring bank to the same card or payment instrument from which the funds were received; cash is not paid instead of a card refund. The time taken for the refund to be credited depends on the payer’s bank.

The return of the share or earmarked contribution is made in the manner established by the decision and program documents: by bank transfer or, if applicable, by transfer of property under a deed. The transaction status and supporting document are sent to the cooperative member after execution.

Payment procedure · Contribution rules · Details

About cooperative and site · Full published text

19 areas of the shared programme

Source status: Public page

19 ECO-PPA directions: member programmes, films about a shared future, themed intros and documentary references from SPECZASHCHITA.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions

Open on the site

The ECO-PPA architecture

19 areas of the shared programme

Areas define long-term tasks. Within them are member programmes, knowledge and primary documents. One programme may be linked to several areas after its classification is approved.

19 directions
25 programs
5P Task Groups

People · Planet · Prosperity · Peace · Partnership

System map

Select a task

Each card opens the purpose of a direction, full films, short intros, related programmes and documentary references.

People

3

Planet

8

Prosperity

6

Peace

1

Partnership

1

SPECZASHCHITA · Film library

Ideas that unite

Explore the vision, see the connections and find a topic that speaks to you. Films about people, knowledge and a shared future.

Direction Meaningful topic

Movies: 74

SPECZASHCHITA · Images of a Common Future

Screensavers in directions

Space, geometry and ideas of cooperation - in short video screensavers.

Select a direction

Screensavers: 39

Brand Screensaver 0:08

SPECZASHCHITA

Common Screensaver of the Cooperative

Brand Screensaver 0:08

ONE SHARED GOAL — A COMMON FUTURE

Common Screensaver of the Cooperative

Screensaver 0:08

SFERA — Brand Intro

Brand Screensaver 0:04

SHARED GOAL — Film Section

Common Screensaver of the Cooperative

Brand Screensaver 0:04

THE POWER OF COOPERATION

Common Screensaver of the Cooperative

Screensaver 0:04

UNIFIED UNIVERSITY

Brand Screensaver 0:04

CROSS-SECTOR CONNECTIONS

Common Screensaver of the Cooperative

Brand Screensaver 0:04

FROM VISION TO ACTION

Common Screensaver of the Cooperative

Brand Screensaver 0:04

CREATING THE FUTURE TOGETHER

Common Screensaver of the Cooperative

Screensaver 0:08

NEW WORLD ORDER

Screensaver 0:08

BIOTRON

Screensaver 0:08

ORION22:22 — AN APPEAL TO PEOPLE

Screensaver 0:08

FENIX - People's Self-Development Program

Screensaver 0:08

EQUILIBRIUM — Opening

Screensaver 0:08

EQUILIBRIUM — Closing

Screensaver 0:07

FENIX — Closing

Screensaver 0:08

HERITAGE PRESERVATION ARCHIVE

Screensaver 0:08

SFERA — A world without borders

Screensaver 0:10

EQUILIBRIUM — Brand Intro

Screensaver 0:06

KRISTALL741 — Vision · Requirements · Fact

Thematic Screensaver 0:07 · without sound

RUSSIA — PEOPLE AND BIOTIC COMMUNITIES

Thematic Screensaver 0:05 · without sound

THE LIVING FABRIC OF THE EARTH — SOIL · WATER · MICROCOSM

Thematic Screensaver 0:05 · without sound

KNOWLEDGE FOR RESTORATION

Thematic Screensaver 0:04 · without sound

PPA

Thematic Screensaver 0:07 · without sound

EVOLUTIONARY FINANCIAL SYSTEM

Thematic Screensaver 0:05 · without sound

Revival of the Earth

Thematic Screensaver 0:04 · without sound

RUSSIA — A NEW ORDER

Thematic Screensaver 0:05 · without sound

SFERA — Revival of the Earth

Screensaver 0:07

INMORTRANS — Shipping in the New Order

Screensaver 0:07

INMORTRANS — Unified Development Program

Screensaver 0:07

INMORTRANS - Cooperation and Responsibility

Screensaver 0:07

INMORTRANS — Science and Fleet Resources

Screensaver 0:07

INMORTRANS — Four Directions

Screensaver 0:07

INMORTRANS — Water and Biotic Communities

Screensaver 0:07

INMORTRANS — Energy for Ship and Shore

Screensaver 0:07

INMORTRANS — The First Pilot

Screensaver 0:07

INMORTRANS — First 90 days

Security Framework

Protection functions

These are not ECO-PPA thematic areas, but ways the cooperative works with enquiries, risks and projects.

  1. 01

    Legal guidance

    We help you gather the facts, determine the applicable framework, and prepare a sequence of further actions.

  2. 02

    Public control

    We receive signals, record circumstances and formulate acceptable methods of public and documented response.

  3. 03

    Project security

    We check documents, participants, counterparties and risks before launching or scaling an initiative.

  4. 04

    Cooperative local units

    We create a work outline for a territory, direction or project with responsible and understandable rules.

  5. 05

    Social protection

    We route requests from veterans, families and social groups based on documents, status and available support mechanisms.

  6. 06

    Expert review

    We involve specialized specialists to analyze documents, risks and controversial circumstances.

  7. 07

    Risk monitoring

    We monitor signs of pressure, conflict, procedural violations and threats to the sustainability of the project.

Next level

From an area to an active programme

Open the programme register or find a publication, study or primary resource in the knowledge base.

Repeated catalog cards are not reproduced here. All materials, programs, directions and texts of films are fully represented in their thematic packages of the printed library.

About cooperative and site · Full published text

25 Programs in One ECO‑PPA Framework

Source status: Public page

25 member programs across 19 ECO-PPA directions: document status, direction, program modules and published resolution details.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs

Open on the site

Members' programs

25 Programs in One ECO‑PPA Framework

Cooperative programs, their areas of work, status and related documents. Search by name or select an area.

19
directions
25
programs
11
approved by the Council

Program Registry

What has been entered into the shared framework

Each card status is determined by documents: a Council resolution, a draft regulation, or the initiative's development stage. It describes the document, not the program's quality or prospects.

Direction Search by program

Showing 25 of 25 items

The status is based on documents and is not a project rating.

One Working Logic

From Contribution to a Verifiable Result

ECO-PPA connects members' individual resources to one process for verification, implementation, result measurement and distribution of created value.

  1. 01 Contribution of participant
  2. 02 Inspection and registration
  3. 03 Inclusion in the program
  4. 04 Project implementation
  5. 05 Result measurement
  6. 06 Value distribution

New Initiative

Do You Have an Asset, Right, Technology or Expertise?

Describe your contribution — the cooperative will review the materials and determine a possible route into a program.

Offer initiative →

Repeated catalog cards are not reproduced here. All materials, programs, directions and texts of films are fully represented in their thematic packages of the printed library.

About cooperative and site · Full published text

Public document library

Source status: Public page

SPECZASHCHITA documents as an evidence base: registration, details, minutes, regulations, membership forms, personal data, targeted programs and project materials.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Open on the site

Documents

Public document library

Registration information, regulations, decisions, participation forms and programme materials are collected in one section so that their status and working procedures can be checked.

ORION22:22 · Unified Structure

White Paper
connects everything.

Meanings, knowledge, documents, reports and registers in one clear system.

Open the unified system White Paper of Shared Destiny · version 1.0

Shown: 54 of 54

Registration and details

4

Governance: minutes and decisions of the Council

3

Regulations and Regulations

3

Entry and application forms

4

Personal data protection

2

Targeted programs

4

Project materials

29

Archive / historical materials

5

Legal disclaimer

  • Privacy policy and consent to the processing of personal data.
  • The materials in this section are for informational purposes only and do not replace individual legal advice.
  • Some documents may be provided upon request if they contain internal information or personal data.
  • Archival and project materials are not valid rules of participation.

Repeated catalog cards are not reproduced here. All materials, programs, directions and texts of films are fully represented in their thematic packages of the printed library.

About cooperative and site · Full published text

Knowledge Center

Source status: Public page

A unified catalogue of SPECZASHCHITA articles, studies, presentations and documents, searchable by area, programme and topic.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge

Open on the site

Knowledge Center

Articles, research and cooperative documents. Read them on the website or open the originals.

ORION22:22 · Unified Structure

White Paper
connects everything.

Meanings, knowledge, documents, reports and registers in one clear system.

Open the unified system White Paper of Shared Destiny · version 1.0

Print collection PHOENIX collection

Search Sort

Found 195 · Shown 12

About Thematic Connections

Thematic connections help users find materials. They are preliminary navigation tags, not confirmation that a document is included in a programme. Check the original source for its status and content.

Map of areas →

Repeated catalog cards are not reproduced here. All materials, programs, directions and texts of films are fully represented in their thematic packages of the printed library.

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Directions and programmes

All 19 directions and 25 programmes in the current public register: their purpose, stated status and cited grounds for decisions. Library resources on targeted programmes are also included; each document’s status is preserved.

Materials: 48 · with full text: 46 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Target programs · Card · document on request

Materials of the target program "Cosy House"

Source status: Project

An affordable accommodation programme for members: goals, mechanism and participation procedure.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Only a catalogue card is published in the library. The full document is available on request; its contents are not included in this compilation.

Open on the site

Target programs · Full published text

PEOPLE'S SELF-DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

Source status: Project

The self-development program is a draft policy document on tasks and the procedure for participation.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/narodnaya-programma-samorazvitiya-1.html

Open on the site

PEOPLE ' S PROGRAMSAMORATION12/20/60

«QUANTUM HARMONY in AGREEMENTALALLY"

FENIX (Finnst) is an ancient Russian symbol of immortality and rebirth, the renewal of man, nature and Russia. As an element of Slavic mythology, it is a bird with feathers of fiery red and gold colors, symbolizing the rising Sun-Yarylo. In the Russian legends, the Finist-Clear Falcon is an eternally young and victorious warrior bird, defender of Rus, justice, covenants and traditions of the Ancestors of Rus, Messenger of the Gods of Heaven Rus

"FENIX"

PEOPLE'S SELF-DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME12/20/60

People's 12-th summer recovery program

20-th summer program of creation

60-th summer program of transformation

Basis for the development of the program

  • First side of the medal
  • The second side of the medal
  • Third Party Medal (Border)

Objective of the programme

In an economic sense:

BB in financial terms:

In a social sense:

Mr. In a scientific and technological sense:

D. In a worldview sense

Infrastructure Project for the Capture of the Future "Russian Map",

First:Transport Project Initiative:

Second: Energy Project Initiative

Third: Information Project Initiative

Fourth: Infrastructure Project Initiative

Fifth: Space Project Initiative 1961-2021-2061(60 Gagarin Flight)

Road map of the program "FENIX"

12 - You are the summer program of the Jupiter Cycle

20 - you summer development programJupiter-Saturn

Road map of the program "FENIX" Jupiter Cycle

20 - you the Jupiter - Saturn Summer Development Program

Objective of the programme

On the basis of knowledge of the Laws of Quantum Harmony of the Universal Order in a coherent universe and knowledge of the cyclic nature and laws of all historical processes, as well as the exact reference system in cyclic coordinates, our national place and role in this planetaryly significant moment of history. It is correct to make a retrospective reassessment of the entire multifaceted national historical experience, for a nationwide understanding of their future, using the wave laws of Skypolitics that are accessible to understanding. Apply common sense in assessing the current world situation and the opportunities that open up, at this point in history, in order to restore, in a manner appropriate to the spirit of the times, sustainable State and Cooperative management of social development processes in the national economic activity, aimed at guaranteeing prosperity and growth in the number of up to 300 million people of the entire people for the next 200 years. To approve and provide a national new social cultural and ideological contour of the GOLDEN AGE, in the center of which is MAN and his SPACE DESIGN IN THE UNIVERSE.

A. In an economic sense:

1.Returning the legal field, from killing the people, to the sphere of market management of economic activity in the country, to the sphere of people's management of economic activity, all life-supporting infrastructure: energy; communication; transport; supplying and providing; housing and production funds; raw materials and land resources; not material and scientific assets.

2.To carry out a deep total modernization of all aspects of life-supporting and industrially reproducing processes on the basis of the world's best samples and technological solutions, using the entire range of closing technologies and emerging technologies of the 6nd technological order.

3.To create a stable, reliable and flexible system of production-consumer and national-economic relations ensuring long-term national prosperity and national development for the next 100 years.

B. Financially:

1.Conditions for the legal and factual return to popular control of historically related national monetary and debt financial assets from the World Financial System.

2.Personally condition and return to the financial circulation of the actually stolen money since the beginning of the administrative chaos of the period of collapse of USSR, perestroika and the period of privatization plundering of the country.

3.On the actual national material basis, create the basis and generation of a new financial asset for the world and national economy, for the long-term, reliable and sustainable functioning of the national three contour financial system.

In a social sense:

Through stabilization and orderly interaction of the main spheres of life support and national life, as well as, relying on the worldview, a conscious picture of the real world, based on national values, the correct education of the younger generation, adequate education of the younger generation and the all-encompassing system of adult vocational training, dynamically meeting the requirements for the current changes in the functioning of the entire state system, to create a stable, guaranteeing all-round security and reliability 150 years.

In a scientific and technological sense:

During our Soviet past, in the scientific and technical thought of the Soviet people’s genius, amazing effects were discovered in a number of physical technological processes, on the basis of which unique technological and production chains and techniques were developed that allow, in many cases, to completely change the industrial technological structure of the national economy and the everyday way of life resulting from this, approaching the ideological national goal of that historical period. Thus, a technologically historical foundation was created for the transition of all mankind to a new technological order corresponding to the coming noospheric New Era in the historical development of mankind, the evidential symbol of which was the year 1961, the time of humanity’s exit into Space.

2025 gives us the opportunity, when expressing our universal national intention, to return to our own lost national heritage, and on its basis, having considered the regular trajectory of PLANETARY history, to step forward, continuing my glorious messianic path, into my own shining national future, taking me in. Having provided the foundation on its own territory, applying in its new national technological structure the national economic and industrial activities of the whole range of Closing Technologies, in the national infrastructure project "RUSSIAN MAP".


D. In a world-view sense:


National Infrastructure Project for the Capture of the Future

"Russian Map",

consists of: 5 National Project Initiatives

First: Transport Project Initiative:

As a result of the initiative, the whole country will receive an ultra-high-tech high-speed transcontinental transport system to provide transportation services, people, goods and money within 5-12 years.

Second: Energy Project Initiative

As a result of the implementation of the initiative, the whole country will receive full excess energy coverage throughout the private and industrial sectors within 3-7 years with the same cost and excess resource generation for sale.

Third: Information Project Initiative

As a result of the implementation of the initiative, Sran will receive the world’s leading infrastructure of functioning cyberspace for managing the digital national and global economy within 1-3 years.

Fourth: Infrastructure Project Initiative

As a result of the implementation of the initiative, the housing issue for all categories of citizens in all regions can be fully resolved within 3-12 years.

Fifth: Space Project Initiative 1961-2021-2061

As a result of the implementation of the initiative, Russia will organize, lead and implement the World Space Program for 2-20 years, which will determine the cosmic future of mankind for the next 2000 years.

First: Transport Project Initiative:

  • 2- the level, the underground cargo; - is a tunnel similar to the underground infrastructure, like the spine hidden in the body, consisting of a set of channels - trunks, along which a platform with reverse polarity moves in a statically stationary spiral magnetic field, it turns out as if the effect of suction by the discharge tunnel, in the form of a platform with a 40 Foot Container (20 tone, with speed 1500 km per hour. This means that the cargo coming from Japan to Europe and entered the system in Vladivostok passing underground 11 500 kilometers, through 12 The clock is in the center of Europe. For reference: now on the water 36 days, by the rain. 16 days, to what extent %? reduced time of transportation? - WHERE IS TIME-MONEY, compressing at the expense of speed commodity time.

Structure of 20 trunks in a harness under the control of the Central Operating System will automatically be able to provide acceptance / dispatch of the platform, its movement with cargo and cargo handling (20 Tons of each 10 seconds from each gun.

Mathematics - Nothing personal, 20x20x10 seconds = 400 The tone in 10 sec. x 6 = 2400 Ton Minute, 144 000 tone per hour, 24 Hours – 3 456 000 tons x 365 days =1 261 440 000 tons per year, at cost 1000 $ the National Park 1 ton at route length 12 000 km and 16 days on the continent. Total, in proportions 1 261 440 000 tons x 1000$ = 1 261 440 000 000$ in a year, or 7 568 640 000 000 Direct revenue from exploitation. Timing of the initiative 12 years, when reaching the design capacity payback 1 year.

The proposed system will provide Russia with an undeniable leadership for the next 120 years in the infrastructure of rapid delivery of cargo in the global logistics system and will create, at least for two centuries, a stable source of constant replenishment of the national heritage, the "common treasury", at the expense of the cost of transportation, in which the share of profits through the ownership of "Transport Bonds" will be relied on by each resident of the country. The system is an Intelligent Automated Transcontinental Transport Complex with a length of 12 000 km.

  • 3-the level, the upper passenger; -is an openwork load-bearing structure located above modern railway tracks, to maintain a bidirectional monorail providing a magnetic suspension of the transported means - platform, relying on an overconducting electromagnetic environment. Construction of engineering structures is made and made of wood CLT panels, the whole structure is based on a distributed screw pile field. The speed of movement of the modular platform through the magnet will be 470-520 km per hour, which will allow the user of the system to cross over the entire surface of our country 12 000 km. from 24 hours of travel, enjoying its Russian Land all possible species, to be at the other end of the continental plate, which as a result of use will lead to a colossal spatial compression of social time. Now the land route takes 7 The system is designed to operate in a fully automatic intelligently controlled mode of sending and moving bidirectional passengers (to the 6 modules from endpoints of the path, each 5 minutes. Mathematics: 72 per hour x 24 Hours = 1728 per day x 365 days = 630 720 man. X 2 (two ends) = 1 261 440 One person per year can maintain the system. At the planned cost of using the system in 100 $, Turnover per year will be 126 144 000$, - (7 568 640 000 Rs., considering the possibility of increasing 5 speed and capacity of the system, which is 630 720 000$ - or 6 307 200 passengers per year. And that’s just in one direction. To cover the entire area, as shown in the figure above, you need to build about 100 000 kilometers of such a highway, at a cost of one kilometer of magnetic wire 8 million.$. The functioning of the system will automatically lead to an increase in non-breakable infrastructure connectivity in the country, and to an increase in the number of 7 the Social Speed of Man Flow and 10 times the passenger flow density per unit time. Build for yourself and for yourself 12 This system can be used for the next few years 200 years to become the main global point of financial settlements for the movement of passengers, goods and services between global markets.
  • 4-th levelAirless network unmanned cargo-passenger; - is a public-cooperative inter-municipal four-circuit intelligent unmanned passenger and cargo air transport system.

1. the contour is ground; each municipality of our country, and their 26 000, places on its territory the central municipal passenger reception, transfer, parking and repair charging unit (gateway) for the elements of the system, in a common calculated graphic grid to cover the territory of the system operating radius

2. air transport contour; consists of a basic set of Intelligent Unmanned Electric Flying Platforms operating in a given digital coordinate system, for safe, fast and comfortable carrying passengers in the most individualized conditions, 2-x, 4-x and 6- those local salons, to any given point in the system's space of operation with a range of transport by air 300-500 km, with speed 200-250 km.h.

and cargo-carrying purposes 200 kg.to 2 with similar speed and vector range depending on the size of the charging grid cells.

3. contour control; static spatial digital model of the territory above or within which the system operates, dynamic mathematical spatial model of the territory is carried out and maintained by the computational GRID network, this is the digital space and environment for the operation of the unmanned system, an integral part of which are data networks.

4. outline core; System Artificial Intelligence under the control of which are all the processes of unmanned movement occurring in the system of digital coordinates of the entire network, carrying out 24 hours a day in any part of our country, the function of providing the possibility of transportation by a call by phone request from any point to any point, while always and at any time the price for transportation will be 1Kilomile. – 1 Ruble in all areas of coverage.

5. SKIF Satellite Group (243 Satellites for global unmanned systems management.

x

Thus:

The Transport Project Initiative offers; during 12 years to create 3-x level National Intelligent Unified Digital Transcontinental Transport System, which will be able to carry out for residents the reach of any point of our country for 24 hours, from threshold to threshold.

Thus, the compressed social and personal time released may allow a different mass look at the implementation of the program of urban settlement and settlement under the national program of the Far Eastern hectare and the Arctic hectare. We win 250 years, remaining an absolute logistics leader, for a quiet, measured creative life of our God-preserved homeland with constant income from guaranteed uninterrupted high-speed transportation of goods, money and services, in the modern paradigm of economic relations.

Second: Energy Project Initiative

The initiative provides for the implementation of the management role and the guarantee of the function of the Civilization Crossing (Russian Map, film 3) in the circulation of the global commodity and raw materials and information and financial flow, the deployment of the network framework of digital distributed generating infrastructure with total combined capacity 300 GW., with open, with further development, the technical possibility of increasing the total generated capacity to 2,5 TWh (total power generation capacity worldwide 4,5 TWt, c 2025 The year will increase to 6 The technological basis of network generation is modular solar-wind-hydro-gas-small nuclear generating complexes with unit capacity 1-2-5-10 Mgw. Placed in a sequence for full coverage of the territory by the network, within the framework of the development program according to the optimal mathematical model. Distributed generation supplies electricity to the backbone system for transportation and sale to the end user, both domestically and externally.

The ecological infrastructure proposed by the project would, through technology and at almost no cost, provide hundreds of millions of people throughout the remote territories of Siberia and the Far East with a renewable, unlimited fuel and energy base. This would support communities living comfortably, permanently or on a rotational basis, with a high quality of life, in any chosen conditions and at any distance from existing centres, in the most beautiful parts of our country. The fuel resources are the Sun, wind, moving water, snow and ice.

Also, the infrastructure will provide social multi-disciplinary employment:

- in the production and industrial process of servicing the system of electricity generation for the supply of its volumes to consumers in the national network and through the existing national network to Europe according to the planned network infrastructure creation using new technologies of electricity transportation, for the transportation of electricity to China;

- in the field of scientific research on the study and application of regional features in the national economy;

- in the production of high-tech area, using in production processes the latest achievements of high technology, in the exploration of fossils, mining, processing and processing of any material, before obtaining a market semi-finished product or finished product with high added value directly in the cluster.

Thus, from the implementation of two project initiatives, we will get 100 years ahead, a comfortable spatial springboard for the development of domestic national human resources provided with accessibility and energy.

At the same time, the creation of new environments will inevitably cause a dialogue between representatives of different civilizations on the principles of the spiritual organization of life. The process of mastering living space inevitably involves the organization and connection of three different shells or environments: the biosphere (spheres of life), the noosphere (spheres of reason and intelligent life, according to Vernadsky) and the pneumatosphere (or spheres of spirit, according to Florensky). Moreover, if humanity went from the transformation of the naturally formed biosphere into the noosphere and the pneumatosphere, spiritualizing and bringing elements of the mind into the natural environment of life, then the present stage of life development suggests that a person based on reason and spirit can artificially form life systems, forming their special spatial-environmental cluster configurations.

  • Ready-made Local autonomous fuel transport solutions


Third: Information Project Initiative

The National Information Project Initiative provides for:

1. Implementation of the project to lay the main electric power and communication fiber optic cable, with a length of 11 700 km., from (St. Petersburg-Helsinki) to Hokkaido (Japan), along the route of the Northern Sea Route. For locking into a global ring, through the national segment, a transcontinental cable communication system, which will eliminate the problem of delay of the passing signal in 31 sec.

Fiber optic cables cover the bottom of all oceans and large seas, even in Lake Ontario in the summer of 2019 earned the American-Canadian communication channel Crosslake Fiber. The only region not yet affected by broadband networks is the Arctic Ocean. There is only one cable laid 15 years ago from Norway to Spitsbergen.
At the same time, the Arctic is the shortest water route from Europe to Asia and further to North America - and these are the three main telecommunications hubs in the world. A hundred years ago, the development of the Northern Sea Route almost halved the distance for the transportation of goods between Northern Europe and the Far East. Now information, digital data is the same product, and the faster and more convenient it moves, the lower the costs and higher the profit.

Level 0

is associated with the physical environment - the signal transmitter and is not actually included in this scheme, but is very useful for understanding. This honorary level represents the intermediaries connecting the end devices: cables, radio lines, etc. Cables there are a great many different types and types: shielded and unshielded twisted pairs, coaxial, based on optical fibers, etc. Since this level is not included in the scheme, it does not describe anything, only indicates the environment.

Level 1

- Physically. Includes physical aspects of binary communication. Describes in detail, for example, voltage, frequency, nature of the transmitting medium. This level is charged with the responsibility of maintaining communication and receiving-transmitting the bit stream. Infallibility is desirable, but not required.

Level 2

- canal. Data connection. Provides error-free transmission of data blocks (called frames) through the layer 1, which may distort the data during transmission. This level should determine the beginning and end of the frame in the bit stream, form from the data transmitted by the physical layer, frames or sequences, include a procedure for checking for errors and correcting them. This layer (and only it) operates with elements such as bit sequences, coding methods, markers. It is responsible for the correct transmission of data (packages) on the sections between the directly related elements of the network. Provides access control to the transmission environment. Due to its complexity, the channel level is divided into two sub-levels: MAC (Medium Access Control (MAC LLC (Logical Link Control (LCR) is the control of logical communication. Level MAC controls network access (with token transmission in Token Ring networks or conflict recognition (clash of transmissions) in Ethernet networks) and network management. Level LLC, Operating above the level MAC, and there is actually the level that sends and receives messages with data.

Level 3

- networked. This layer uses the capabilities provided by the 2 layer to provide communication between two points on the network. Any, not necessarily related. This layer carries messages over a network that can have many lines of communication, or over multiple collaborative networks that require routing, i.e. determining the path through which data should be sent. Routing is done at the same level. Performs address processing, as well as demultiplexing.

The main function of the software at this level is to select information from the source, convert it to packets and correctly transfer it to the destination.

There are two fundamentally different ways of working at the network level. The first is the virtual channel method. It consists in the fact that the communication channel is established at the call (the beginning of the session), information is transmitted through it, and at the end of the transmission the channel is closed (destructed). The packets are transmitted with the original sequence, even if the packets are sent along different physical routes, i.e. the virtual channel is dynamically redirected. In this case, data packets do not include the address of the destination, because it is determined during the establishment of communication.

The second is the datagram method. Datagrams are independent, they include all the information necessary for their shipment. While the first method provides the next level (level 4) with a reliable data transmission channel that is free from distortions (errors) and correctly delivers packets to the destination, the second method requires the next level to work on errors and verify delivery to the desired destination.

On the Internet, this level is supported by the IP protocol.

Level 4

- transport. Regulates the transmission of message packets between processes running on network computers. Completes the organization of data transfer: controls on a cross-cutting basis the flow of data passing along the route determined by the third level: the correctness of the transfer of data blocks, the correctness of delivery to the desired destination, their completeness, safety, order of following. Collects information from the blocks in its former form. Or it operates with datagrams, i.e. it waits for a response-confirmation of reception from the destination, checks the correctness of delivery and addressing, repeats the datagram’s parcel if the response did not come. Within the framework of the transport protocol, there are five classes of transport quality and appropriate management procedures. The same level should include a well-developed and reliable addressing scheme to provide communication across multiple networks and gateways. In other words, the task of this level is to bring to mind the transfer of information from any point to any in the entire network. The transport layer hides from all higher levels any details and problems of data transmission, provides standard interaction of the level lying above it with the reception-transfer of information regardless of the specific technical implementation of this transmission.

On the Internet, this layer is supported by the protocol TCP.

Level 5

- séance. Coordinates the interaction of the communicating users: establishes their connection, operates with it, restores the emergency sessions. The same level is responsible for network mapping - it converts regional (domain) computer names into numeric addresses, and vice versa. It coordinates not computers and devices, but processes in the network, supports their interaction - manages communication sessions between application-level processes.

Level 6

- level of data presentation. This level deals with the syntax and semantics of the transmitted information, i.e., it establishes the mutual understanding of the two communicating computers as to how they represent and understand the transmitted information upon receipt. Here, for example, such tasks as transcoding text information and images, compression and decompression, support for network file systems (NFS), abstract data structures, etc. are solved.

Level 7

- applied. It provides an interface between the user and the network, makes all kinds of services available to a person. At this level, at least five application services are implemented: file transfer, remote terminal access, electronic message transfer, directory service, and network management. In a particular implementation, it is determined by the user (programmer) according to his immediate needs and capabilities of his wallet, intellect and imagination. It deals, for example, with a variety of different terminal type protocols, of which there are more than a hundred.

2. Creation within three to five years (2020-2025g.) of the National Computing Platform on the basis of GRID network built into the fabric of the state communication infrastructure of electronic government in the segment of digital economy management. The project SKIF-GRID system covering the whole country includes:

  • 26 000 municipal nodes of supercomputer servers;
  • 128 nuclear architecture of the network base computing node;
  • 47 000 terminal points for wireless access zones;
  • 87 000 fixed points of direct video exchange;
  • Network Channel Binding Points at speed 1Ggb/sec, 5G
  • Installation capacity of the transmission channel 1 TB;
  • Basic network performance500 T.Flop, peak 1 P.Flop
  • Memory capacity, base 10 million. TB;

National "Cloud" GRID – The network at the heart of the infrastructure is intended to be a tool to ensure the fundamental constitutional right to digital equality for the population in the possibility of obtaining all types of information services and modern cloud services throughout the country 24 hours per day.

According to computational parameters, the network will exceed the combined computing power of American supercomputers that operate the global Internet, thus, the National Network will be able to provide and guarantee a secure Digital National Sovereignty in the global cyberspace, including, acting as a national defense cyber security system.

According to the project, in 5 years, it is planned to upgrade the system, switch to a neuroflon computer and change the computing core to a photonic processor, after which the operating parameters of the system can be upgraded to a degree.

The implementation of the Russian innovations in the field of IT-technologies, based on the global infrastructure of the Internet, can lead to the creation of the World Digital Cyberspace, operating meta-system mathematical models that are able to accommodate and operate to change the current 3 dimensional reality in the online feedback mode. The creation of a networked Mega supercomputer will make Russia a leader in the development, creation and maintenance of a global digital interface to the cloud infrastructure of cyberspace. The Mega network supercomputer is able to operate (operationally manage) the full digital model of the country, the entire global infrastructure in an interactive mode, providing customers with all types of digital services and Cyber-Space capabilities throughout the planet. The functional working environment of the space is carried out by a cluster mega-supercomputer. Access to the cyber environment is carried out through public sphere gateways or through individual network VIP-terminals of virtual presence. The implementation of projects in cyberspace will allow to obtain a real mathematical 4D model of the solar system as a whole, 4D model of the Earth and all major planetary processes, 4D model of Russia, all infrastructure, model of regional development plans, etc.

Fourth: Infrastructure Project Initiative

The initiative involves the creation of a network of infrastructure, evenly distributed across the country, from 1000 New cities with population up to 25 000 in large nodes of the main stream and network intersection, and 10 000 cluster noosphere settlements with population up to 3-5 thousands of people as network maintenance and support infrastructure. Examples of territorial solutions of the Venera project

The implementation of the project during 5-7 will involve in active employment up to 35 000 000 jobs at the stage of construction of the network and high-tech highway, in the subsequent maintenance, operation and management of the entire second level system.

The project implementation process will have a macro-stimulating effect on all regions of the country, and on the development of national basic industries.

The use of a combination of only two technologies in the field of production of new building materials and their application will allow for 10 years to completely rebuild the entire housing stock in the country, and the constructive execution of new cities of these materials will be the pinnacle of architectural biosphere aesthetics.

The first technology is the production and use of hyper-pressed bricks and structural building elements. The construction of 300 plants in former growth points, now monotowns, completely, i.e. forever, will close the question of the need for always equally cheap and high-quality building material for the population and the construction industry.

The second technology is the production of CLT panels and products from them. Full production can be deployed at a regular sawmill site.


Fifth Strategic Space Initiative2011 -2061

Anniversary Edition 2020 the National Strategic Space Initiative (2011 – 2061 It organically continues the traditions of the Russian school of comic thinking and technological approach, reflected in the documents of the Soviet Space Initiative (1946-1964 Inevitable development of the planned development of near space for industrial, pragmatic and scientific purposes. The cycle of activities for the coordination of a single space program within the Space Initiative 2011 Year includes levels: Noospheric, Planetary, International,National, Corporate.

The concept of the national space initiative 2011-2061 was developed by the ETR-United Technologies Group in cooperation with specialists from the leading enterprises of the space industry. RSC Energia, TsNIIMASH, Institute of Space Research, with the participation of the intergovernmental commission of the state Duma on space on the eve of the 50 anniversary of Gagarin's flight.

Project objectives (initiatives)

Introduction

For many ages, peoples and cultures have had the earth, the sky and the stars, now the heavens have opened before humanity, in the form of a mesmerizing pulsating universe in a majestic infinite grandeur with an infinite number of systems, billion galaxies, hyperclusters in megastructures, pulsars, quasars, black holes, plasma flows, all kinds of radiation and an immeasurable number of planets.

Goal: Restoring the final consolidation of the historically legal status of Russia as a concept-technological legislator and planetary leader in creating technical opportunities to unite the efforts of all nations in solving the problem of large-scale development of the treasures of the Solar System.

Plan-line development and development is technologically possible using already operated space systems using chemical processes of hot oxidation to obtain traction when moving in space, with all types of associated restrictions on the continuous duration of flights in space.

Result of the project (initiatives)

Strategically breakthrough development in the creation of a large-scale space infrastructure for space exploration, possibly based on knowledge of the electromagnetic and electrical nature of all macro-processes within a single whole, the Solar System.

Based on the conclusions of the formulated heper-spatial physics of cosmic processes and a fundamentally different, torsion-technological scheme of movement, between celestial bodies using the transformation and transformation into a directed force of the basic energy that carries out the rotation of the planet, the rotation of the Solar system, and the rotation of the galaxy, in the Big Space.

Space propulsion systems of the new generation will allow humanity in the next 25-50 years to begin the integrated development of the planets of the solar system and their satellites using research telemetry robotic intelligent complexes.

The creation of the "Stratospheric electromagnetic launch complex" which will allow to deliver to orbit from 100 to 500 tons of payload every day, 365 days of the year. During 10 years in orbit can be raised 365 000 Tons to 2 000 000 tons of structures for the construction of orbital complexes and fleets of interplanetary cities - stations designed for continuous stay in space 3-5 000 during the cycle of circumnavigation of the Solar System, in order to study the environmental conditions on planetary bodies in order to create technological capabilities of expeditionary and long-term visits to all celestial bodies within the Solar System.

Thanks to a fleet of 20-30 units, in the interplanetary environment of the solar system on a universal measuring instrument the size of the solar system can carry out their research, scientific and production activities in space up to 500 000 people at the same time, and to visit space swimming as a tourist several million.

Key elements of the expanded National Strategic Space Initiative 2011-2061 are:

  • Approved Strategic Initiative Action Plan
  • highly effective existing and emerging technological systems, such as Sea Launch, ISS, Glonass; Vostochny spaceport.
  • designed and developed space complexes, such as: "Air Launch", "International Orbital Technological Research Institute" (IOTI), Orbital Automated Industrial Production Platform (OAPPP), space transport system for near-space exploration consisting of four levels, orbital near-Earth, orbital near-moon, intermediate at the point of libration between the orbits of the Earth and the moon.
  • A support network of educational high-tech universal demonstration complexes for the purpose of popularization, education, education, training and comprehensive preparation of young people for interested participation in state and international space activities.

According to the stages of implementation of the general program, on the visible side of the Earth satellite, to carry out the planned construction of network swarms of robots, full-fledged under the surface engineering and transport infrastructure. The technological system should provide the possibility of a permanent, safe, comfortable stay on the moon tens of thousands of people, with various production, scientific and research missions and provide a regular scheduled visit to the satellite by tourist groups. On the surface of the moon, the construction of a spaceport for reception, circulating space transport along the route of the Earth's orbit - the Moon - the Earth's orbit;

construction under the surface of the technological complex of cargo locks for mooring, parking and maintenance of ships intended for tourist and cargo use in near space, as well as systems and mechanisms for receiving, processing and storing materials and equipment elements delivered from Earth;

construction of a network of radial stations-settlements connected by tunnel arteries infrastructure designed for permanent residence of tourist groups or service personnel under the lunar surface;

- at different depths inside the satellite body:

constructing an interconnected system of cavities in the ground and deep within the rock of an inactive celestial body, to house storage and generating equipment for various purposes;

construction of the main element of the Lunar transport and instrument-scientific system, engineering construction of tunnel type with a length of 3 500 km, passing through the body of the satellite. The system is designed for permanent operation, protected by high-speed transport backbone, delivering personnel, equipment, materials, assembled components and structural parts, for large-scale construction of a base for the permanent stay of mankind on the far side of the Moon;

- on the far side of the satellite:

construction of a large spaceport complex - Space Earth Representation, with locks and hangars in the mine exit area, with all associated engineering technical infrastructure to ensure the process of final assembly, testing and commissioning of the Starfleet of large spacecraft, automatic systems and space stations;

construction of a scientific measuring system of the Space Mission with an area of a measuring mirror equal to the size of the Moon's disk, for close study of local, galactic and deep layers of the Universe, creation on the basis of such an instrument of a system of distant galactic communication and a system of control of all space within the Solar System.

Project duration: 60 years

Project implementation targets: Technological goal, as a result, to create, for future epochs, on the Earth satellite, the Moon, the technological fundamental basis of the multilayered autonomous infrastructure of the Great Space Portal for the Cosmic Future of Human Civilization.

  • In the field of global energy supply of the economy and life processes of the population of the BRICS countries and the whole planet, for the next 20 000

Construction and operation of production equipment systems under the control of artificial intelligence and robotic surface of the moon. Extraction and processing of local material explored by lunar expeditions into necessary finished products such as; liquefied oxygen, hydrogen, iron, titanium and packaged for delivery to the Earth isotope Helium 3, fuel for thermonuclear power plants. The explored reserves of which, according to the results of the research missions carried out by the USSR on the Moon, are more than 1 billion tons, which is guaranteed to provide an increasing need for energy for all mankind, for tens of thousands of years.

Project implementation period: 3-5 years for the preparation and implementation of the mission of the lunar rover group, by the number of countries participating in the program. For pre-intelligence of selected localizations and engineering markings of planned construction, industrial territories, under the control of artificial intelligence. With the actual availability of already developed and tested prototypes of machines, landing modules and delivery ships, as well as remote control systems, 7-10 years for the development and delivery of the first industrial equipment for the further process of large-scale development of the Lunar platform.

Project implementation targets: with technological steps in 7, 12, 20 and 30 years, to deploy on the moon, the infrastructure of a multifunctional industrial complex forever providing planetary civilization with an external platform for space activities.

SINOPSIS of the projectLunaBalt:

When it finally came to us, with what grace, perseverance, perseverance and determination, our ancestors conducted this operation, then we have to admit that we can forgive all the mistakes made, the price for which they were paid, is explored and confirmed by two robots1 and the moon-2, energy reserves of the future of mankind in the aggregate 26 000 years.

Robots have done everything 11 Months on the Moon, Moon rovers controlled1 and the moon-2 From the ground, each of them drilled around 500 wells, to the depth of 2,5 meters, shot thousands of panoramas and examined tens of hundreds of kilometers2. After the Lunokhods were out of action, they remained on the Moon and, first, are visible from Earth, to become only with the help of our Lunokhods, or rather with the help of their corner antenna reflectors, it was finally possible to establish the exact distance to the Moon, well, and most importantly, are physical evidence to the world community, Russia's claims to leadership in this project.

So why LunaBALT, and all just the first Russian car was RUSOBALT and our country this year celebrates its centenary, therefore, the first space vehicle (CTS), it may well be LunaBALT, if we honestly come up with it, we call it! But in general, LunaBalt is not only a CCC, it is also a system for their design and construction, construction, service (in unearthly conditions) and modernization, but also the organization of races and all that part of this industry. Let these races will first take place in cyberspace, especially since everything is filmed, can easily be digitized and turned into a 3D model of the Moon, but in the future the races will turn into real space auto shows, where there are no leaders and no one even has any claims to this leadership, except for Russia of course.

Mining and processing regolith, transporting Helium-3 into orbit and to Earth, assembling lunar stations, building a ship for the “Space Odyssey”—all that comes later. For now, there is racing on the Moon: first on an exact digital replica, and then, once you have practised and proved that you can be a LunaBALT pilot, a real race. Just show me a boy who would not want a ride on another planet, even if he starts in a simulator seat. Then we will see; perhaps there will be a place for that boy in the “Space Odyssey” too.

RUSSOBALT

PR

LUNA-BALT

IPO "BRICS"

IPO"USA"-IPO"RUSSIA"-IPO"EUROPE"

IPO"OIC"-

IR

Project:

Luna BALT:

Energy part of the "Space Odyssey".

Our fathers and grandfathers, who brilliantly conducted this operation .... Dedicated.

The goal of the project: Creation of Mega Holding uniting several industries, such as IT, engineering companies, 3D- studio design, rocket companies, construction firms, auto giants, scientific centers of the world, etc.

Due to the fact that modern humanity can go and has already gone into some kind of collapse, chaos and as a result began to destroy itself. Let’s not dwell on the reasons that led to this, let’s just try to think about the DESTRUCTION of human civilization.

The center of initialization and the control center of "Lunnaya" part of the project is proposed to make Bauman University, as a place from where it came, aviation, nuclear (peaceful and military) energy, astronautics and many other industries.

Economic indicators: Helium-3 contained in the regolith, which covers the lunar surface with a layer of thickness 5-15 According to the latest estimates, it contains about billion tons of thermonuclear fuel, one kilogram of helium-3, The energy indicators are equal 33 000 Translate this, until the untouchable stock in dollars, as the hand does not rise, may be tempted, someone, even the moon to privatize and tax, on any action with it.

For reference, on Earth, in scattered state, in all forms, is 4 000t Helium-3

The project itself is divided into several stages, the first and most important stage, a cyber system should be built, the control and visualization of mathematical fields in the virtual space. Such a system will be arranged as a GRID, in each cluster it will rely on a personal Super computer and can support any remote operator with mathematical support.

The next stage will be the construction of several autonomous transport robots (Lunokhod3,-4,-5 and so on), throwing them on the moon, repairing and modernizing the lunar rover-1 and the moon-2, full exploration and preparation of both LunaBALTA racing tracks, and preparation of places for the meeting of ore mining robots, organization of lunar stations, Helium logistics stations, etc.

-Next, it is planned to build a transshipment base in the orbit of the Moon, with the simultaneous uploading of dozens of Harvester Robots to the Moon, capable of immediately turning rigolite into helium-3 cylinders, without any additional alterations.

-Well, in conclusion of the project on the moon will have to modularly assemble a spacecraft to start "Space Odyssey" (see the project "Space Odyssey")

IR-Service: The priority task of specialists in working with investments of the LunaBALT project will be to obtain IPO The project, especially since there will be assets in the security 33 000 000 000 000000 oil, fully confirmed by space exploration robots1 and the moon-2, Belonging USSR.

PR-Service: It is engaged in the popularization of the Space Odyssey and LunaBALTA, the organization at the beginning of virtual, and subsequently real lunar auto racing, forms a new branch of engineering - space automotive industry, car tuning, modernization, etc.

Target programs · Card · document on request

Regulations on the target consumer program

Source status: current

Rules of the mutual support programme: participants, registration, contributions and transaction procedures.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Only a catalogue card is published in the library. The full document is available on request; its contents are not included in this compilation.

Open on the site

Target programs · Full published text

Title page of the target program (sample)

Source Status: Sample

The title page of the target program shows how program documents are drawn up.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/titulnyi-list-programmy-kooperativa-4.html

Open on the site

THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 year, 2,5 years, 4 years, 7 years, 12 years, 14 years, 20 years, 36 years, 60 years, 84 years, 144 years.

20252037 20492061 207320852097 21992211 2223 22352247 2259

Directions · Full published text

01 · Living environment

Source status: Public direction

Comprehensive development of an accessible and environmentally safe living environment: housing, mutual support services and shared infrastructure for cooperative members.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=1#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Integrated development of affordable and environmentally safe living environments

Direction content

Comprehensive development of an accessible and environmentally safe living environment: housing, mutual support services and shared infrastructure for cooperative members.

National project — reference point

Infrastructure for Life

Programs in this area

  • Sphere — Approved by the Council
  • Mutual support — Initiative in development
  • Cozy house — Initiative in development
  • PLOYADKA — Initiative in development
  • KUPOL — Initiative in development

Directions · Full published text

02 · Clean energy

Source status: Public direction

Development of distributed energy and local generation: modular solutions, energy efficiency and verifiable characteristics of energy facilities.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=2#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Development of distributed energy systems and local generation

Direction content

Development of distributed energy and local generation: modular solutions, energy efficiency and verifiable characteristics of energy facilities.

National project — reference point

New nuclear and energy technologies

ECO-PPA Modules

  • EN

Programs in this area

  • KEU-60 — Initiative in elaboration

Directions · Full published text

03 · Food systems

Source status: Public direction

Sustainable agriculture, biofarms and food security: closed production cycles, raw material processing and food production.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=3#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Sustainable agriculture, biofarms and food security

Direction content

Sustainable agriculture, biofarms and food security: closed production cycles, raw material processing and food production.

National project — reference point

Technological Support for Food Security

ECO-PPA Modules

  • WW
  • CE
  • AG

Programs in this area

  • Full cycle farm "BioFarm Plus" — Approved by the Council
  • Deep processing of grain: Mountain Altai — Draft provision

Directions · Full published text

04 · Clean water

Source status: Public direction

Water management and water systems development: access to water, treatment, reuse and loss reduction.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=4#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Water resource management and water supply system development

Direction content

Water management and water systems development: access to water, treatment, reuse and loss reduction.

National project — reference point

Environmental Well-being

Programs in this area

There are no programs in the registry yet.

Directions · Full published text

05 · Health and longevity

Source status: Public direction

Health, rehabilitation and active longevity: medical and social solutions, rehabilitation centers and drug development.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=5#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Health, rehabilitation and active longevity

Direction content

Health, rehabilitation and active longevity: medical and social solutions, rehabilitation centers and drug development.

National project — reference point

A Long and Active Life

ECO-PPA Modules

  • AG

Service contours

  • S

Programs in this area

  • Medical Substances — Approved by the Council
  • Rehabilitation and rehabilitation of participants of the SVO — Draft regulations

Directions · Full published text

06 · Environmentally friendly materials

Source status: Public direction

Development and application of environmentally friendly materials: research, testing, rights to results and industrial development of materials.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=6#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Development and use of environmentally safe materials

Direction content

Development and application of environmentally friendly materials: research, testing, rights to results and industrial development of materials.

National project — reference point

New Materials and Chemistry

ECO-PPA Modules

  • CE

Programs in this area

  • Vologda OSP Plant — Approved by the Council
  • Materials — Draft provision

Directions · Full published text

07 · Circular economy

Source status: Public direction

Waste management, recycling and resource reuse: from safe handling of industrial waste to returning raw materials to the production cycle.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=7#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Waste management, recycling and resource reuse

Direction content

Waste management, recycling and resource reuse: from safe handling of industrial waste to returning raw materials to the production cycle.

National project — reference point

Environmental Well-being

ECO-PPA Modules

  • CE
  • ER

Programs in this area

  • Industrial waste disposal — Approved by the Council

Directions · Full published text

08 · Critical materials

Source status: Public direction

Processing lithium and other critical materials: technologies for extracting useful components from natural and industrial raw materials.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=8#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Recycling lithium and other critical materials

Direction content

Processing lithium and other critical materials: technologies for extracting useful components from natural and industrial raw materials.

National project — reference point

New Materials and Chemistry

ECO-PPA Modules

  • CE
  • LR

Programs in this area

  • EcoMining (IEMP) — Initiative in development

Directions · Full published text

09 · Land restoration

Source status: Public direction

Land restoration, reclamation and stabilization of soils: return of disturbed territories to safe and economically viable circulation.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=9#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Land restoration, remediation and soil stabilization

Direction content

Land restoration, reclamation and stabilization of soils: return of disturbed territories to safe and economically viable circulation.

National project — reference point

Environmental Well-being

Programs in this area

There are no programs in the registry yet.

Directions · Full published text

10 · Forests and biodiversity

Source status: Public direction

Conservation of forests, biodiversity and natural capital: reforestation, protection of natural areas and support of sustainable ecosystems.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=10#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Conservation of forests, biodiversity and natural capital

Direction content

Conservation of forests, biodiversity and natural capital: reforestation, protection of natural areas and support of sustainable ecosystems.

National project — reference point

Environmental Well-being

Programs in this area

There are no programs in the registry yet.

Directions · Full published text

11 · Aquatic ecosystems

Source status: Public direction

Restoration of rivers, lakes, seas and coastal areas: pollution reduction, restoration of water ecosystems and careful use of water resources.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=11#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Restoration of rivers, lakes, seas and coastal areas

Direction content

Restoration of rivers, lakes, seas and coastal areas: pollution reduction, restoration of water ecosystems and careful use of water resources.

National project — reference point

Environmental Well-being

Programs in this area

There are no programs in the registry yet.

Directions · Full published text

12 · Environmentally friendly transport

Source status: Public direction

Development of an environmentally efficient transport system: shipbuilding, port infrastructure and logistics with measurable resource efficiency.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=12#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Development of an environmentally efficient transport system

Direction content

Development of an environmentally efficient transport system: shipbuilding, port infrastructure and logistics with measurable resource efficiency.

National project — reference point

Industrial provision of transport mobility

ECO-PPA Modules

  • WW

Programs in this area

  • Shipbuilding and port logistics — Approved by the Council
  • OCEAN-80 — Draft Regulation

Directions · Full published text

13 · Clean production

Source status: Public direction

Ecological modernization and automation of production: biotechnological and chemical production, resource efficiency and industrial implementation of developments.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=13#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Environmental modernization and automation of manufacturing

Direction content

Ecological modernization and automation of production: biotechnological and chemical production, resource efficiency and industrial implementation of developments.

National project — reference point

Means of Production and Automation; Technological Support for the Bioeconomy

Note to Orientation

a list based on the programs in this area; there is no single reference

ECO-PPA Modules

  • EN
  • CE
  • AG
  • ER

Programs in this area

  • PROMBIT — Approved by the Council
  • Bioprotein production — Draft regulation
  • Smolensk Gas Chemical Complex — Draft Regulation

Directions · Full published text

14 · Green employment

Source status: Public direction

Training and job creation in the environmental economy: training, retraining, mentoring and promoting the employment of participants.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=14#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Workforce development and job creation in the green economy

Direction content

Training and job creation in the environmental economy: training, retraining, mentoring and promoting the employment of participants.

National project — reference point

Workforce

Service contours

  • S

Programs in this area

  • FENIX — Approved by the Council

Directions · Full published text

15 · Environmental education

Source status: Public direction

Education, science and environmental competences development: training programs, research practices and dissemination of knowledge about sustainable development.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=15#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Education, science and environmental skills development

Direction content

Education, science and environmental competences development: training programs, research practices and dissemination of knowledge about sustainable development.

Programs in this area

There are no programs in the registry yet.

Directions · Full published text

16 · Sustainable tourism

Source status: Public direction

Development of ecological tourism and natural areas: tourist infrastructure, natural sites and employment taking into account the load on ecosystems.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=16#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Development of sustainable tourism and natural areas

Direction content

Development of ecological tourism and natural areas: tourist infrastructure, natural sites and employment taking into account the load on ecosystems.

National project — reference point

Tourism and hospitality

ECO-PPA Modules

  • LR

Service contours

  • S

Programs in this area

  • Ark - Approved by the Council

Directions · Full published text

17 · Environmental monitoring

Source status: Public direction

Unified digital system of environmental data and monitoring: collection of indicators, document flow, traceability of decisions and accounting of program results.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=17#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Unified digital system for environmental data and monitoring

Direction content

Unified digital system of environmental data and monitoring: collection of indicators, document flow, traceability of decisions and accounting of program results.

National project — reference point

Data Economy and Digital Transformation of the State

Note to Orientation

a reference for digital infrastructure, not a claim of participation in the national project

Service contours

  • MRV

Programs in this area

  • EQUILIBRIUM — Approved by the Council

Directions · Full published text

18 · Impact assessment

Source status: Public direction

Evaluation, validation and verification of environmental and social outcomes: methodologies, baseline data, calculations and independent verification of reported impacts.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=18#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

Assessment, validation and verification of environmental and social outcomes

Direction content

Evaluation, validation and verification of environmental and social outcomes: methodologies, baseline data, calculations and independent verification of reported impacts.

ECO-PPA Modules

  • LR
  • ER

Programs in this area

  • Biocenosis India — Initiative in development

Directions · Full published text

19 · International cooperation

Source status: Public direction

International cooperation and financing of environmental projects: partnerships on technologies, agricultural solutions, personnel and resource attraction.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions?n=19#direction-detail

Open on the site

Full Task

International cooperation and financing for environmental projects

Direction content

International cooperation and financing of environmental projects: partnerships on technologies, agricultural solutions, personnel and resource attraction.

National project — reference point

International Cooperation and Export

ECO-PPA Modules

  • WW
  • AG

Service contours

  • S

Programs in this area

  • International agro- and greenhouse complex — Approved by the Council
  • Personnel: India — Initiative in elaboration

Programs · Full published text

PROMBIT

Source status: Approved by the Council

Industrial biotechnology: organizing the development, financing and implementation of biotechnological production and research.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-prombit

Open on the site

Purpose

Industrial biotechnology: organizing the development, financing and implementation of biotechnological production and research.

Status

Approved by the Council

The basis

Council minutes No. 13 of 16.07.2026

Modules and service contours

  • AG
  • CE

Area of work

13 · Clean production

Programs · Full published text

Full-Cycle Agrifarm “BioFerma Plus”

Source status: Approved by the Council

An integrated farm with a closed biocenosis: aquaculture, biofilter plants, quail husbandry, and processing of biomass into humic fertilizer.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-bioferma-plus

Open on the site

Purpose

An integrated farm with a closed biocenosis: aquaculture, biofilter plants, quail husbandry, and processing of biomass into humic fertilizer.

Status

Approved by the Council

The basis

Council minutes No. 13 of 16.07.2026

Document note

Extends the PROMBIT track; results may be used in the Cooperative's integrated environmental projects by decision of the Council (cl. 1.3 of the Regulations).

Modules and service contours

  • AG
  • CE
  • WW

Area of work

03 · Food systems

Programs · Full published text

Phoenix

Source status: Approved by the Council

A community university: training, retraining and professional development of personnel, and support for the employment of cooperative members.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-fenix

Open on the site

Purpose

A community university: training, retraining and professional development of personnel, and support for the employment of cooperative members.

Status

Approved by the Council

The basis

Council minutes No. 6.1.1 of 28.04.2025

Modules and service contours

  • S

Area of work

14 · Green employment

Programs · Full published text

Equilibrium

Source status: Approved by the Council

A cooperative-management IT platform: member accounts, records of share and earmarked contributions, and document workflows for targeted programs.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-equilibrium

Open on the site

Purpose

A cooperative-management IT platform: member accounts, records of share and earmarked contributions, and document workflows for targeted programs.

Status

Approved by the Council

The basis

Council minutes No. 6.2 of 05.05.2025

Modules and service contours

  • MRV

Area of work

17 · Environmental monitoring

Programs · Full published text

Sphere

Source status: Approved by the Council

The Sphere digital platform for the media industry: a marketplace with an escrow-based settlement mechanism, a social network, and an advertising platform.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-sfera

Open on the site

Purpose

The Sphere digital platform for the media industry: a marketplace with an escrow-based settlement mechanism, a social network, and an advertising platform.

Status

Approved by the Council

The basis

Council minutes No. 8.1 of 01.07.2025

Area of work

01 · Living environment

Programs · Full published text

Industrial Waste Recycling

Source status: Approved by the Council

An industrial-waste recycling facility for hazard classes I–V in the Chelyabinsk Region: consolidating documentation, raising financing, and providing support.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-utilizatsiya

Open on the site

Purpose

An industrial-waste recycling facility for hazard classes I–V in the Chelyabinsk Region: consolidating documentation, raising financing, and providing support.

Status

Approved by the Council

The basis

Council minutes No. 9.1 of 11.12.2025

Modules and service contours

  • CE
  • ER

Area of work

07 · Circular economy

Programs · Full published text

Kovcheg

Source status: Approved by the Council

A safari resort in the Moscow Region under the national project “Tourism and the Hospitality Industry”; a demonstration site for the environmental track and biocenosis.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-kovcheg

Open on the site

Purpose

A safari resort in the Moscow Region under the national project “Tourism and the Hospitality Industry”; a demonstration site for the environmental track and biocenosis.

Status

Approved by the Council

The basis

Council minutes No. 9.4.1 of 16.01.2026

Modules and service contours

  • LR
  • S

Area of work

16 · Sustainable tourism

Programs · Full published text

Vologda OSB Plant

Source status: Approved by the Council

Organizing financing for OSB board production in the town of Sokol, Vologda Region.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-vologodskiy-osp

Open on the site

Purpose

Organizing financing for OSB board production in the town of Sokol, Vologda Region.

Status

Approved by the Council

The basis

Council minutes No. 9.5 of 24.02.2026

Document note

The rights holder's design, permitting and contractual documentation is not included in the Program's assets (cl. 1.2 of the Regulations).

Modules and service contours

  • CE

Area of work

06 · Environmentally friendly materials

Programs · Full published text

Medical Substances

Source status: Approved by the Council

Development, registration, certification and organization of production of pharmaceutical substances and plant-based preparations.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-med-substantsii

Open on the site

Purpose

Development, registration, certification and organization of production of pharmaceutical substances and plant-based preparations.

Status

Approved by the Council

The basis

Council minutes No. 14 of 20.07.2026

Modules and service contours

  • AG

Area of work

05 · Health and longevity

Programs · Full published text

International Agro and Greenhouse Complex

Source status: Approved by the Council

Intensive-type greenhouse complexes (the “phytopyramid” technology) and international cooperation on agricultural and personnel matters; in coordination with BioFerma Plus.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-agro-teplichny

Open on the site

Purpose

Intensive-type greenhouse complexes (the “phytopyramid” technology) and international cooperation on agricultural and personnel matters; in coordination with BioFerma Plus.

Status

Approved by the Council

The basis

Council minutes No. 14 of 20.07.2026

Modules and service contours

  • AG
  • WW

Area of work

19 · International cooperation

Programs · Full published text

Shipbuilding and Port Logistics

Source status: Approved by the Council

River-sea class vessels, fishing and auxiliary fleets, port and transshipment hubs, export and transit logistics.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-sudostroenie

Open on the site

Purpose

River-sea class vessels, fishing and auxiliary fleets, port and transshipment hubs, export and transit logistics.

Status

Approved by the Council

The basis

Council minutes No. 14 of 20.07.2026

Modules and service contours

  • WW

Area of work

12 · Environmentally friendly transport

Programs · Full published text

Rehabilitation and Recovery for Special Military Operation Participants

Status of source: Draft provision

Medical, social and psychological rehabilitation and recovery; the creation and equipping of rehabilitation centers.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-svo-reabilitatsiya

Open on the site

Purpose

Medical, social and psychological rehabilitation and recovery; the creation and equipping of rehabilitation centers.

Status

Draft Regulation

Modules and service contours

  • S

Area of work

05 · Health and longevity

Programs · Full published text

Bioprotein Production

Status of source: Draft provision

Industrial production of a high-protein product from natural gas through microbiological conversion, for the feed and food industries.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-bioprotein

Open on the site

Purpose

Industrial production of a high-protein product from natural gas through microbiological conversion, for the feed and food industries.

Status

Draft Regulation

Modules and service contours

  • AG
  • CE

Area of work

13 · Clean production

Programs · Full published text

Smolensk Gas Chemical Complex

Status of source: Draft provision

A gas-chemical complex for the deep processing of natural gas and the manufacture of chemical products in the Smolensk Region.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-smolensk-ghk

Open on the site

Purpose

A gas-chemical complex for the deep processing of natural gas and the manufacture of chemical products in the Smolensk Region.

Status

Draft Regulation

Modules and service contours

  • EN
  • ER

Area of work

13 · Clean production

Programs · Full published text

Deep Grain Processing: Gorny Altai

Status of source: Draft provision

Production of processed grain products and feed and food ingredients in the Altai Republic.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-gorny-altay

Open on the site

Purpose

Production of processed grain products and feed and food ingredients in the Altai Republic.

Status

Draft Regulation

Modules and service contours

  • AG

Area of work

03 · Food systems

Programs · Full published text

Materials Science

Status of source: Draft provision

Development and industrial adoption of new materials and formulations; rights to the results of intellectual activity, research and testing.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-materialovedenie

Open on the site

Purpose

Development and industrial adoption of new materials and formulations; rights to the results of intellectual activity, research and testing.

Status

Draft Regulation

Area of work

06 · Environmentally friendly materials

Programs · Full published text

OCEAN-80

Status of source: Draft provision

Shipbuilding, dredging and port infrastructure; launched as a pre-investment review.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-okean-80

Open on the site

Purpose

Shipbuilding, dredging and port infrastructure; launched as a pre-investment review.

Status

Draft Regulation

Modules and service contours

  • WW

Area of work

12 · Environmentally friendly transport

Programs · Full published text

Mutual provision

Source status: Initiative in development

A targeted consumer program of mutual provision of goods, works and services; the regulations are being prepared for approval by the Council.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-vzaimnoe-obespechenie

Open on the site

Purpose

A targeted consumer program of mutual provision of goods, works and services; the regulations are being prepared for approval by the Council.

Status

Initiative in progress

Area of work

01 · Living environment

Programs · Full published text

Cozy home

Source status: Initiative in development

A network of available accommodation for participants invited for employment.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-uyutny-dom

Open on the site

Purpose

A network of available accommodation for participants invited for employment.

Status

Initiative in progress

Area of work

01 · Living environment

Programs · Full published text

KEU-60

Source status: Initiative in development

A modular power unit for distributed generation; materials are undergoing review of title and specifications.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-keu-60

Open on the site

Purpose

A modular power unit for distributed generation; materials are undergoing review of title and specifications.

Status

Initiative in progress

Modules and service contours

  • EN

Area of work

02 · Clean energy

Programs · Full published text

EcoMining (IEMP)

Source status: Initiative in development

An international program for the integrated environmental processing of man-made mineral formations with land reclamation; materials are undergoing title review.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-ecomining

Open on the site

Purpose

An international program for the integrated environmental processing of man-made mineral formations with land reclamation; materials are undergoing title review.

Status

Initiative in progress

Modules and service contours

  • CE
  • LR

Area of work

08 · Critical materials

Programs · Full published text

Biocenosis India

Source status: Initiative in development

An analytical base on India's carbon footprint and land degradation: four analytical reports based on national registries and IPCC/FAO methodologies.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-biotsenoz-india

Open on the site

Purpose

An analytical base on India's carbon footprint and land degradation: four analytical reports based on national registries and IPCC/FAO methodologies.

Status

Initiative in progress

Modules and service contours

  • LR
  • ER

Area of work

18 · Impact assessment

Programs · Full published text

Personnel: India

Source status: Initiative in development

International cooperation on training and recruiting personnel.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-kadry-india

Open on the site

Purpose

International cooperation on training and recruiting personnel.

Status

Initiative in progress

Modules and service contours

  • S

Area of work

19 · International cooperation

Programs · Full published text

PLATFORM

Source status: Initiative in development

An electronic trading service with settlements through escrow accounts; launched in 2020.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-ploshchadka

Open on the site

Purpose

An electronic trading service with settlements through escrow accounts; launched in 2020.

Status

Initiative in progress

Area of work

01 · Living environment

Programs · Full published text

DOME

Source status: Initiative in development

The “DOME” integrated radar security system; a technical product, with materials undergoing review.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/programs#program-kupol

Open on the site

Purpose

The “DOME” integrated radar security system; a technical product, with materials undergoing review.

Status

Initiative in progress

Area of work

01 · Living environment

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Cooperative documents and public rules

Organization profile, governance, regulations and personal data, as well as published versions of the website’s legal documents. For materials available on request, only descriptions already public and the contact procedure are provided.

Materials: 17 · with full text: 8 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Registration and details · Card · document on request

Charter of NPK “NPO SPECZASHCHITA”

Source status: current

Defines membership procedures, the powers of the cooperative’s governing bodies, types of contributions, and rules for recording and returning shares. A certified copy is provided to a bank or another applicant with a substantiated reason upon request.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Only a catalogue card is published in the library. The full document is available on request; its contents are not included in this compilation.

Open on the site

Registration and details · Card · document on request

Extract from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities (EGRUL)

Source status: current

Confirms the existence of the legal entity. An up-to-date extract can be obtained independently from the Federal Tax Service at egrul.nalog.ru using OGRN 1207700383087.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Only a catalogue card is published in the library. The full document is available on request; its contents are not included in this compilation.

Open on the site

Registration and details · Full published text

Organisation Details for NPK “NPO SPECZASHCHITA”

Source status: current

Verifiable details: name, address, OGRN, INN, KPP, bank, contact details and authorized signatory.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/karta-npk-npo-speczashchita.html

Open on the site

Official card of the organization with verifiable details. Information can be checked with the USRUL in the open service of the Federal Tax Service of Russia on OGRN 1207700383087.

Full nameNon-Profit Consumer Cooperative “Scientific and Production Association ‘SPECZASHCHITA’”
Abbreviated NameNPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA
Name in EnglishNon-profit Consumer Cooperative "Scientific-production Association "Special Protection"
Legal, postal and actual addressRoom 11, Building 2, 22 Stanislavskogo Street, Moscow 109004, Russia
Sitehttps://speczashchita.com
Emailoffice@speczashchita.com
Phone+7 (921) 307-67-01
Taxpayer Identification Number (INN)9709066128
KPP770901001
Primary State Registration Number (OGRN)1207700383087
Legal FormNon-profit consumer cooperative
Main activityActivities of head offices (OKVED 70.10)
Settlement account40703810325000000023, Branch "Central" VTB Bank (PAO) in Moscow
Correspondent account30101810145250000411 in the Central Federal District of the Bank of Russia, g. Moscow
BIK (bank identification code)044525411
A person with the right to sign without a power of attorneyChairman of the Board NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" — Berdnikov Alexander Ivanovich

Registration and details · Card and available sources

Form Р13014 (registration of changes)

Source status: archive

Form Р13014 for state registration of changes — confirms the cooperative’s registration actions.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/r13014.html

The public HTML page contains no readable form text: it displays a repeated administrative header or footer. The form file listed in the old register is missing. Use the library page to obtain the form.

Open on the site

Management: minutes and decisions of the Council · Full published text

Order on the powers of the Chairman of the Management Board

Source status: current

Authorization Order - confirms who is acting on behalf of the cooperative.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/prikaz-na-berdnikova-a-yu-pp-npk-npo-spetszaschita.html

Open on the site

Non-profit Consumer Cooperative

Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA"

(NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA")

Legal Address: 109004, Moscow, st. Stanislavsky, 22, p. 2, room 11

Actual address and address for correspondence: 109004, Moscow, st. Stanislavsky, 22, p. 2, room 11

Site:HYPERLINK "https://nposz.ru" https://nposz.ru E-mail: info@nposz.ru Tel. +7(495) 766-20-24

OGRN 1207700383087, INN 9709066128, KPP 770901001

"21" June 2025 Moscow


P R I K A Z No 13

"On the assumption of the position of Chairman of the Board and accounting employee"

1. According to Protocol No7 from 09 June 2025the Council of Non-profit Consumer Cooperative " Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA" From "07" December 2021and making appropriate changes to the USRUL, I assume the position of Chairman of the Management Board NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA“From this date on5 (five) years.

2. Due to the absence of the position of an accounting officer in the staffing table, I impose the responsibility for maintaining accounting and submitting reports.

Chairman of the Board

NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"_______________________A.I. Berdnikov

Management: minutes and decisions of the Council · Card · document on request

Board Minutes No. 02 dated 13.01.2021

Source status: archive

A historical Board decision from the cooperative’s registration file.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Only a catalogue card is published in the library. The full document is available on request; its contents are not included in this compilation.

Open on the site

Management: minutes and decisions of the Council · Card · document on request

Board Minutes Nos. 6, 6.1, 7, 8

Source status: current

Record Board decisions on admitting cooperative members, programmes and appointments. They contain personal data and are therefore provided upon a substantiated request.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Only a catalogue card is published in the library. The full document is available on request; its contents are not included in this compilation.

Open on the site

Regulations and regulations · Full published text

Regulations on a Cooperative Unit (Legal Entities)

Source Status: Sample

Defines how a cooperative unit is established, its governing bodies, tasks and relationship with the Board.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/polozhenie-o-kooperativnom-uchastke-yul.html

Open on the site

Approved by the Council decision NPK"NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" Protocol No. ... from "...... 2025

Chairman of the Board NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"

______________Berdnikov A.I.

COOPERATIVE PARTY STATUS

«…..»

NON-COMMERCIAL CONSUMER COOPERATION "Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA"

1. General

1.1. Co-operative site Limited Liability Company "Supply Complex" was established on the basis of the decision of the Council of Consumer Society (co-operative) "International Research and Production Center "Hyperion" (hereinafter - the Company) and carries out its activities in accordance with the articles 17, 18 The Law of the Russian Federation "On Consumer Cooperatives (Consumer Societies, Their Unions) in the Russian Federation" and the Charter of the Company. 1.2. Co-operative site "Limited Liability Company "Pavstavok Complex" (hereinafter referred to as the Co-operative site) is a part of the Company, in which an unlimited number of cooperative members. 1.3. The cooperative area is located at: 119180, RF, g. Moscow, st. Polyanka B., d.7/10, Page.3, Pom.2, room.17. 1.3. The cooperative site exercises its powers in the person of its governing bodies, which are cooperative members the Cooperative Site and the Chairman of the Cooperative Site. 1.4. The cooperative site uses and disposes of the property allocated for its use and disposal by the Company or received on other grounds. The cooperative site is not a legal entity and cannot independently exercise the powers of the owner of the property in its use and disposal. 1.5. The implementation of specific operations for the use and disposal of property allocated to it by the Company, the management bodies of the Cooperative site shall be carried out on the basis of decisions and orders of the management bodies of the Company, as well as the credentials of the Chairman of the Council and the Chairman of the Board, the relevant competences of these management bodies of the Company. 1.6. Accounting of property allocated for use and disposal of the Cooperative site is carried out on the balance sheet of the Company. The transfer of such property for use and disposal of the Cooperative site is carried out on the basis of the decision of the Council of the Company and the act of acceptance and transfer from the management bodies of the Company to the management bodies of the Cooperative site. 1.7. The cooperative site has bank accounts, round printing, stamps, forms with its name, emblem, brand symbols and other means of visual identification (requisites). The circular seal is intended for certification, which are within the competence of the cooperative site management bodies, internal documents, decisions, orders, primary accounting documents, contracts. The name of the Cooperative site specified in the round seal, stamps, forms with its name, emblems, brand symbols and other means of visual identification (requisites) should contain the name of the Company. The cooperative site is considered to be created from the moment of its approval by the decision of the Council of the Company and is created for an indefinite (not limited in time) period.

Objectives and objectives of the Cooperative Area

2.1. Objectives: 2.1.1. Ensure reliable, efficient and transparent management of international and domestic supply chains, creating a competitive advantage for customers through the integration of advanced logistics solutions, digital technologies and high quality standards. 2.1.2. Become a leader in transport and logistics services using integrated solutions that contribute to the sustainable development of customers’ business. 2.2. Objectives: 2.2.1. Fast and accurate delivery of goods due to optimized processes and modern transport technologies; 2.2.2. Use of digital platforms and blockchain technologies to ensure full transparency of operations and tracking of cargo at every stage; 2.2.3. Introduction of advanced IT solutions, automation of logistics processes, integration with international standards of sustainable development; 2.2.4. Application of environmentally friendly technologies, rational use of resources and reduction of carbon footprint in logistics processes; 2.2.5. Long-term relationships with customers and partners based on mutual trust, flexibility and adaptability to changing market conditions. 2.2.6. Combining a full range of transport and logistics services - from cargo transportation and warehousing to integrated supply chain management; 2.2.7. Providing accurate forecasting, operational decision-making and a high degree of transparency based on modern IT systems, Big Data analytics and blockchain solutions; 2.2.8. Creation of a network of regional centers and international partnerships, allowing to effectively serve both domestic and foreign markets, taking into account local peculiarities; 2.2.9. Application of innovative technologies aimed at reducing environmental impact; 2.2.10. Maintenance and replenishment of a team of highly qualified specialists in the field of logistics, transport and supply chain management; 2.2.11. Introduction of automation and analytics systems to optimize supply chain management; 2.2.12. Integration of blockchain technologies to ensure transparency and control of transactions; 2.2.13. Development of a network of regional hubs to cover key transport hubs and international routes; 2.2.14. Strengthening partnerships with international transport and logistics companies; 2.2.15. Implementation of energy efficient vehicles and environmentally sound technologies; 2.2.16. Development of programs to reduce the carbon footprint and optimize resource use; 2.2.17. Organization B2B- events, forums and conferences to exchange experience and establish long-term relationships with key customers and partners; 2.2.18. Implementation of loyalty programs and comprehensive service offers for the constant development of the client base; 2.2.19. Regular independent audits and monitoring of key performance indicators (KPI); 2.2.20. Implementation of feedback systems to promptly respond to customer requests and adjust business processes.

Powers of the Cooperative Area

3.1. The cooperative area in the face of its governing bodies has the following powers: - attracts new people to the consumer society cooperative members, receives applications from them and sends these applications for consideration to the Board of the Company; - collects entrance, unit and membership fees, and sends them to the settlement account of the Company, specified by the Board of the Company; - disposes of the property of the Cooperative plot, including its funds, within its competence, estimates and restrictions on transactions approved by decisions of the Board of the Company; - prepares, agrees, visas contracts in relations with other persons, including cooperative members, and sends them to the Society for imprisonment; - studies the demand cooperative members And the people follow orders cooperative members; - organizes the provision of services cooperative members; - considers the issues of the activities of the Cooperative site, the Company and consumer cooperation in general and informs about it cooperative members; - agrees on the working conditions of the enterprises and divisions of the Company serving this cooperative site; develops proposals for expanding the production base of the Company; - considers complaints and applications cooperative members and makes proposals for taking measures to the Council of the Company; - stores the documentation of the Meetings cooperative members The cooperative site, brings their decisions to the Council of the Company and its other management and control bodies, sends to the Council of the Company copies of these decisions, certified by the signature of the Chairman and the seal of the Cooperative site; -stores copies of documents certified by the seal of the Company and the corresponding signatures of its management concerning the activities of the Cooperative site: decisions and administrative documents of the Company's management bodies, statements cooperative members, contracts and others; - exercise other powers attributed to its competence by decisions of the management bodies of the consumer company, with the exception of powers related to the exclusive competence of these bodies.

4. Management bodies

4.1. The supreme governing body of the Cooperative Section is the Meeting of its members, convened as necessary, but at least once a year, at the request of: - the Council, Management Board and Audit Commission of the Society; - the Chair of the Cooperative Section; - a group of members of the Cooperative Section representing at least 50% of its total membership. 4.2 The Meeting of members of the Cooperative Section is quorate if more than 50% of the members are present. Decisions of the Meeting are adopted by a simple majority of the votes of members present. 4.3 A member’s non-participation in a vote, vote “against”, or abstention does not constitute grounds for failing to comply with a decision adopted in the prescribed manner. 4.4. Between Meetings of members, the Cooperative Section is headed by its Chair, elected by the members of the Cooperative Section for a term of five years. The Chair is confirmed in office by the Council of the Society on the basis of the minutes of the Meeting of members of the Cooperative Section. 4.5. Where the Cooperative Section has a large membership, it is divided into groups of members headed by authorised representatives of the Cooperative Section. Representatives are elected for every hundred members of the Cooperative Section at meetings of the groups of members and exercise their powers on the basis of decisions of those meetings approved by the Chair of the Cooperative Section. The representatives represent the groups of members and have one vote at the Meeting of members of the Cooperative Section. The Chair of the Cooperative Section is its authorised representative at the General Meeting of the Society.

5. Competence of management

5.1. Collection cooperative members Cooperative site: considers all issues of the activities of the Cooperative site and the Company within the powers of the Cooperative site, specified in p.2 this Regulation; approves programs for the development of the Cooperative site; develops orders to the leadership of the Cooperative site and its units; considers proposals for the exclusion of cooperative members from the Company; hears reports of the management of the Cooperative site and its subdivisions. 5.2. To the exclusive competence of the Assembly cooperative members The cooperative site includes: - election of the Chairman of the cooperative site; - approval of proposals on the creation of the Company or its accession to the unions of consumer companies, as well as on withdrawal from them; - approval of proposals on the transformation of the Company into another organizational and legal form. Voting protocols with registration lists for each of these issues, certified by the Chairman and authorized by the Cooperative site, are sent to the Board of the Company to summarize the results of voting on all cooperative sites. 5.3. The Chairman of the cooperative site: - by proxy of the Chairman of the Council of Consumer Society acts on behalf of the Cooperative site and the Company, represents it in relations with third parties; - prepares, agrees, visas contracts in relations with other persons, including with cooperative members, and sends them to the Company for conclusion; - opens settlement accounts in banks and bears all the responsibility associated with these actions; - carries out day-to-day management of the activities of the cooperative site, organizes its economic activities; - disposes of the property of the cooperative site, including its funds, within its competence within the competence of the Cooperative site; - organizes the collection of entrance, unit and membership fees, the provision of services cooperative members, Convening of Meetings cooperative members cooperative site; - considers applications, complaints and orders cooperative members The cooperative site, takes measures for them, controls the observance of the Law of the Russian Federation "On Consumer Cooperation", the Charter of the Company, decisions of the management and control bodies of the Company at the Cooperative site. 5.4. The exclusive competence of the Chairman of the cooperative site includes: - convening and holding meetings cooperative members the cooperative site, determining, in coordination with the Board of the Company, the agenda of meetings; - hiring, appointing and dismissing employees of the cooperative site in coordination with the Board of the Company; - drafting and changing internal regulatory documents of the cooperative site, internal regulations and regulations on the forms and amounts of remuneration and their approval in the Board of the Company; - suspension of membership cooperative members Co-operative site in the Company until the decision of the General Meeting of the Company on their exclusion for reasons provided for by the Charter of the Company.

6. Accounting and financial reporting

The cooperative site is obliged to maintain accounting primary documentation, as well as to submit financial statements to the Company. The Chairman of the Cooperative Site is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the information contained in the accounting and financial reports provided to the Company. Accountant or accountant-cashier of the Cooperative site provides the following reports to the Company: on cash turnover - every day; on estimates approved by the Company's Council - every month; on limited transactions approved by the Company's Council - every quarter; on emerging taxation - every month. 6.4. Personal accounts cooperative members The cooperative area shall be taken into account simultaneously in the cooperative area and the Company. 6.5. Activities on creation and use of non-profitable common funds in the Cooperative site, determination of their limits is carried out on the basis of decisions of the Company’s Council.

7. Termination

7.1. Termination of activity of the Cooperative site is carried out: by decision of the Assembly cooperative members cooperative site; by decision of the Board of the Company; on other legal grounds. 7.2. The Council of the Company on the next day after the decision to terminate the activities of the Cooperative site appoints a liquidation commission and establishes the procedure and terms for terminating the activities of the Cooperative site. 7.3. Liquidation Commission accepts and verifies all the obligations of the Cooperative plot, consolidates its property and assets. 7.4. Termination of activity of the Cooperative site is considered completed, and the Cooperative site is considered to have ceased its activities after the decision of the Company’s Council on the basis of the submission of the liquidation commission. 7.5. Documents of permanent storage in the Co-operative area are transferred for storage to the Company Council.

Regulations on the cooperative section of the Non-commercial Consumer Cooperative "Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA"

Page PAGE2 of NUMPAGES2

Regulations and regulations · Card · document on request

Membership and contribution regulations

Source status: current

Defines participant statuses, types of contributions and payment procedures. Contribution amounts are disclosed before the agreement is signed.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Only a catalogue card is published in the library. The full document is available on request; its contents are not included in this compilation.

Open on the site

Regulations and regulations · Card · document on request

Regulations for requests

Source status: Project

Sets out the procedure for receiving, classifying and reviewing enquiries and the deadlines for responding to applicants.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Only a catalogue card is published in the library. The full document is available on request; its contents are not included in this compilation.

Open on the site

Personal data protection · Card · document on request

Regulations on the protection of confidential information and personal data

Source status: current

Regulates the processing of personal data of applicants and programme participants.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Only a catalogue card is published in the library. The full document is available on request; its contents are not included in this compilation.

Open on the site

Personal data protection · Card · document on request

Consent to personal data processing (form)

Source Status: Sample

The form of consent that the applicant signs when submitting documents.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Only a catalogue card is published in the library. The full document is available on request; its contents are not included in this compilation.

Open on the site

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Forms and joining

Published templates for a letter, a questionnaire, an application and a participation agreement. The cards explain each form’s purpose; restricted document packages are not reproduced.

Materials: 4 · with full text: 3 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Forms of entry and application · Full published text

Questionnaire, application and participation agreement (blank form)

Source Status: Sample

The questionnaire, membership application and participation agreement forms are used to formalize cooperative member status.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/1-spetszaschita-anketa-zayavlenie-dogovor-tssep-froks.html

Open on the site

Date: "....."..2025g.

Chairman of the Board NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"

…

OGRN ....

INN/KPP ....

Legal address: ....

Phone: .....

Email: .....


APPLICATION No1

on joining the Non-commercial Consumer Cooperative "Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA" (NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA")


.....................(Applicant) ,

(full name of legal entity)

in the face:

______________________________,(F.I.O., post)

Acting on the basis of:

.

(Charter, power of attorney, etc.)

1. Asks to accept ..... as associate members of the Non-profit Consumer Cooperative "Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA" (NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA").

2. Commits to complying with Charter requirements NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" and during 3-x (three) working days from the date of submission of the present application to make an entrance fee in the amount of .... (for LS. 100 000 (one hundred thousand rubles.

3.Makes an entrance fee in the amount of .......... rub.

4. Undertakes to comply with the Terms and Conditions approved by the Regulations and Programs NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA", undertakes to participate in the implementation of the Cooperative Community Development Target Program (CoE Target Program) and other programs, makes appropriate Targeted contributions share contributions and share contributions the relevant Programmes and Funds NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITAdefined and approved by the relevant internal provisions NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITAas well as the relevant Joint Regulations and Programmes approved as NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITAapproved jointly with other members of the cooperative community - other cooperatives (cooperatives; consumer cooperatives; consumer societies).

5.In case of interest/initiation of the Applicant in participation in the Programs NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA“The applicant undertakes to:

- fill out the Application for participation in the relevant Program NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA";

- fulfill the conditions and requirements of the relevant Programs and Regulations NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA";

- to participate in the development of the Cooperative Community on the basis of the Programmes NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA";

- make appropriate earmarked contributions share contributions and share contributions, relevant to the Programmes, Regulations and Regulations of the respective Funds NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITAdefined and approved by the relevant internal provisions NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITAas well as the relevant Joint Regulations and Programmes approved as NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITAand other cooperatives (cooperatives; consumer cooperatives; consumer societies).

In this case, I report the bank details:

p/s: ...

c/s: ....

BIC ....

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Document circulation between the Applicant and NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA":

The applicant is notified that he can exchange documents with NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" 3 (three) ways:

1 WAY. Self-visiting office NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA".

In office NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" - g. Moscow, st. Stanislavsky 22 p.2 pom11.

The applicant, having previously contacted the office NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA", arrives independently and at his own expense at the above address, where he draws up all the necessary Statements and contracts. Passes to representative NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA“All declarations and treaties signed by themselves.

NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" signs all declarations and treaties on its part. He keeps his copies, and transmits copies to the applicant at the office NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" Back.

The applicant also transfers certified by himself (or notarized copies) all copies of the constituent documents of the legal entity.

NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" invoices the Applicant for the payment of the entry fee, the target fee and share contribution.

The applicant during 3-days pays these bills and sends to email NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"Scan copies of payment orders with the mark of your bank (on the execution of this payment). E-mail box NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" - info@nposz.ru Site NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA": www.nposz.ru .

2 WAY. Sending package to office NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" by postal and courier services.

The applicant, independently and at his own expense, sends to the office NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" - g. Moscow, st. Stanislavsky 22 p.2 pom11. package of documents, including:

- all necessary Applications (signed and completed by the Applicant);

- all necessary contracts (signed and completed by the Applicant);

- copies of the constituent documents of the legal entity (page certified by the signatures of "COPY VERNA", page certified by the signature of the responsible official, page certified by the seal of the Applicant Organization; /OR all the constituent documents are stitched together, page numbering of all documents as a single document, a control label is pasted on which the following information is applied - the number of pages, the name of the organization signed).

NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" accepts the applicant's documents delivered by the postal and courier services.

NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" invoices the Claimant for the Introductory Contribution, the Earmarked Contribution and share contribution.

The applicant during 3-days pays these bills and sends to email NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"Scan copies of payment orders with the mark of your bank (on the execution of this payment). E-mail box NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" - info@nposz.ru Site NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA": www.nposz.ru .

In agreement with the applicant NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" sends the postal courier service at the expense of the Applicant all documents related to the interaction NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" - The applicant. The Applicant pays for the services of postal and courier services according to preliminary invoices or upon receipt of a package of documents, he pays independently and directly to postal and courier services.

3 WAY. Sending the package to the office NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" via email.

The applicant, independently and at his own expense, sends to the office NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" - Mr. Moscow, st. Stanislavsky 22 Page.2 Pom11. by sending information electronically to the e-mail address - info@nposz.ru a package of documents that includes:

- all necessary Applications (signed and completed by the Applicant);

- all necessary contracts (signed and completed by the Applicant);

copies of the constituent documents of the legal entity (page certified by the signatures of "COPY VERNA", page certified by the signature of the responsible person, page certified by the seal of the Applicant Organization; /OR all the constituent documents are stitched together, page numbering of all documents as a single document, a control label is pasted on which the following information is applied - the number of pages, the name of the signatory, the signature).

NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" accepts the applicant's documents sent by the postal services.

NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" invoices the Claimant for the Introductory Contribution, the Earmarked Contribution and share contribution.

The applicant during 3-days pays these bills and sends to email NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"Scan copies of payment orders with the mark of your bank (on the execution of this payment). E-mail box NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" - info@nposz.ru . Site NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA": www.nposz.ru .

In agreement with the applicant NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" sends from the funds of the Applicant by the postal service all documents related to the interaction NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"The applicant. The Applicant pays for the services of postal and courier services according to preliminary invoices or upon receipt of a package of documents, he pays independently and directly to postal and courier services.

Any of the methods of sending documents and/or exchanging documents shall be accepted by all Parties and shall be sufficient for record-keeping.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Annex:

1. Copies of constituent documents, which reflect the right of a legal entity to be an associate member of the Cooperative (cooperative member).

2. A document confirming the powers of a representative of a legal entity.

(name, position and name of the head)

or any other person entitled to act

without power of attorney/representative by proxy) ______________________ /.../

(signature, seal)

"... ........................2025.

Date: "......... 2025g.

Chairman of the Board NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"

from .....

OGRN:

INN/KPP:

Legal address:

Phone:

E-mail:


APPLICATION No2

on joining the Target socio-economic program "Finance for the development and health of the cooperative community" (hereinafter - CSEP FROX)

... (Applicant)

(full name of legal entity)

in the face:

,(F.I.O., post)

Acting on the basis of:

.

(Charter, power of attorney, etc.)

1. Asks Non-profit Consumer Cooperative "Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA" (NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA") to accept the Applicant in the Target socio-economic program "Finance for the development and health of the cooperative community" (hereinafter - the Center).

2.The applicant, for his part, voluntarily participates in the Cooperative Development Trust Fund and makes a Target Contribution for the development of the Cooperative movement, the infrastructure of the Cooperative, and the Non-profit Consumer Cooperative "Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA", for its part, confirms the consideration of the documents of the applicant applied for participation in the CSEC FROX and is ready to provide support within its participation in the Targeted socio-economic program "Finances for the Development and Health of the Cooperative Community".

3. The applicant undertakes to comply with the requirements of the Charter NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" and the requirements of the provisions of the CSE FROX.

4. We confirm that the Applicant is familiar with the Regulation on the Target socio-economic program "Finance for the development and improvement of the cooperative community" and has no restrictions on participation in the CSE FROX, which may not lead to the achievement of cooperative member the objectives of the CCEP FROX Target Program. The applicant does not hide and / or distort the information transferred to the participants of the Target Program about himself, his activities, his assets, the activities of affiliates with cooperative member persons, as well as other circumstances that create impossible and / or negative / negative conditions that arose due to the fault cooperative member and do not allow to fulfill the Target program CSE FROX.

5. We undertake to comply with all the terms of the contractual relationship between the Applicant and NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" related to the Targeted Socio-Economic Program "Finance for the Development and Health of the Cooperative Community".

6.We guarantee to comply with the Confidentiality Agreement in the framework of cooperation between the Applicant and NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA".

(name, position and name of the head)

or any other person entitled to act...

without power of attorney / representative by power of attorney) ___________________ /... /

M.P.

"..........2025g.

"APPROVED"

Council NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"

CONTRACT - PUBLIC OFFER No. ..... CSEP FROX OSN

In accordance with article 438 The Civil Code of the Russian Federation (CC RF), unconditional acceptance (acceptance) of the terms of this Agreement - the public Offer (hereinafter - the Agreement) is considered to be the payment of contributions established by the Charter and the receipt of a card cooperative member, Profiles cooperative member the Council of Non-profit Consumer Cooperative " Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA" (NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITAhereinafter - Cooperative).

Terms used:

Consumer cooperation is a system of consumer cooperation organizations created to meet the material and other needs of their members.

cooperative member - a member of a consumer society, a citizen and / or a legal entity that has made entrance and share contributions and accepted into a consumer society in the manner prescribed by the Charter of the Cooperative.

Entry fee is a non-refundable sum of money aimed at covering the costs associated with joining a consumer society.

share contribution - property contribution cooperative member in cooperative share fund consumer society money, securities, land or land shares, other property or property or other rights that have a monetary valuation.

Targeted share contribution (earmarked contribution, earmarked project contribution) - property contribution cooperative member in the target joint stock of money, securities, land plots or land shares, other property or property rights, intellectual, creative, other assets that have a monetary valuation.

1. SUBJECT OF THE TREATY

1.1. cooperative member brings in NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" share contribution in the Target socio-economic program "Finances for the development and improvement of the cooperative community" (hereinafter - CSEP FROX) in accordance with the Statement, the provisions of the Cooperative and Corporate agreements, in accordance with the provisions of the CSEP FROX, for use in accordance with the Charter of the Cooperative. The cooperative is named cooperative member (Trustee cooperative member) Membership Card for the Cooperative.

share contribution will be on the account NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" and upon application cooperative member Funds share contribution can be used to cover additional costs or refunded cooperative member.

1.2. share contribution is perpetual, at the disposal of the Cooperative until the moment of withdrawal cooperative member the Cooperative.

1.3.All share contributions and/or targeted share contributions, carried out as necessary and in the interests of implementation of the CSEC FROX, are accountable and are directed to the implementation of specific activities for the coordination of the Parties.


2. RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PARTIES

2.1.Estimated value share contribution cooperative member the Cooperative is the property cooperative member.

2.2.The cooperative guarantees cooperative member The Secret of Mutual Contribution.

2.3. The cooperative provides cooperative member information on the activities of the cooperative, in accordance with the procedure provided for in the Charter of the cooperative.

2.4. A share contribution to TsSEP FROKS (developed and being implemented by PK “MEKA” and NPK “NPO ‘SPECZASHCHITA’”) is a property contribution by a Cooperative Member to the Cooperative(s), in the form of money, securities, a land plot or land share, other property or property rights, or intellectual, creative or other assets with a monetary valuation. It is used to implement the relevant TsSEP in accordance with the Cooperative Member’s Application, the Cooperatives’ Charters, their internal regulations and the Corporate Agreements between the Cooperative(s) and the Applicant, in accordance with the provisions of TsSEP FROKS, to assist the Applicant within TsSEP FROKS in fulfilling the Cooperatives’ statutory aims and objectives.

2.5. cooperative member has the right to withdraw from membership in the Cooperative, after the full return of all loans (loans, loans) issued to it by this Cooperative, taken from the Cooperative for use (rent) of tangible or intangible assets, or other obligations in accordance with the relevant

contracts, as well as the performance of other obligations to the Cooperative or its cooperative members.

2.6.Return cooperative member cash equivalent of funds, produced by the Cooperative after the liquidation of all types of debt cooperative member. By agreement of the Parties, the cost of unliquidated obligations can be compensated from the funds to be returned, which is formalized by a separate bilateral protocol. In case of liquidation of the cooperative, cooperative member the amount of the share is paid in accordance with the Charter of the Cooperative.

2.7.The cooperative undertakes to return the monetary share (the remaining part of the share) cooperative member upon request cooperative member within the terms established by the Charter of the Cooperative, after the adoption by the Council of the Cooperative of the decision on the results of consideration of the application for withdrawal cooperative member the Cooperative.

2.8.Upon reaching cooperative member the objectives of the Target Programme cooperative member Targeted share contributions The target program remains in cooperative share fund Cooperatives.

2.9.When not reached cooperative member the objectives of the Target Programme for circumstances related to the activities cooperative member, including concealment and/or misrepresentation of information submitted by cooperative member participants of the Target Program about themselves, their activities, their assets, activities of affiliated companies cooperative member persons, as well as other circumstances that created impossible conditions through the fault of cooperative member the Target Program - Target share contributions cooperative member the Target Program cooperative share fund Cooperatives.

2.10.In case of unjustified refusal to return the cooperative cooperative member share (the remaining value of the share) under this contract, the Cooperative is responsible for the refusal in the manner prescribed by Art.395 the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

3. DATE OF ACTION OF THE TREATY

3.1. This Agreement shall enter into force from the date of actual submission (transfer) of) cooperative member introductory fee and share contribution the Target socio-economic program "Finances for the development and improvement of the cooperative community" (hereinafter - CSEP FROX.

3.2.The cooperative cannot break, unilaterally (without written consent cooperative member), Contract with cooperative member, Except in cases:

- violation of the Charter of the Cooperative cooperative member;

- violation of the agreements stipulated by the mutual obligations of the Parties, and in the manner prescribed by the Charter of the Cooperative and the provisions of the CSEC FROX.

3.3.For cooperative member this Agreement shall terminate upon adoption by the Council of the Cooperative of a decision on the results of consideration of the application for withdrawal from cooperative members Under the conditions of p. 2 this Agreement or in the event of death cooperative member.

4. CONCLUDING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATY

4.1. Any information obtained in the framework of the implementation of the Target Program, including the terms of this agreement, its additional agreements and other related information, is confidential and is not subject to disclosure.

4.2. The terms of this Agreement may be changed by mutual agreement with the mandatory preparation of a written document, which is signed by both Parties, and becomes an integral part of this Agreement.

4.3. The Parties shall resolve all disputes through negotiation. If they fail to reach agreement on a disputed matter, the Parties have the right to apply to arbitration or judicial bodies at the claimant’s location, whose decision shall be final and binding on the Parties.

4.4.Parties are exempt from liability for the period during which the circumstances of force majeure (force majeure), namely: war, natural disasters, social and military unrest, fires, epidemics, etc., as well as government regulations or changes in the current state legislation.

4.5. On the occurrence of force majeure, the expected duration of their action, termination of their action, the Party for which they occurred must immediately notify the other Party.

4.6.All notices and communications must be in writing. Communications will be deemed to be properly executed if they are sent by registered mail, by telegraph, teletype, telex, telefax or delivered personally to the legal (postal) addresses of the Parties with receipt under receipt by the relevant officials.

4.7. In everything else that is not provided for by this agreement, the Parties shall be guided by the current legislation of the Russian Federation.

4.8.This contract is drawn up in two copies, having the same legal force, one copy for each of the Parties.

5. LEGAL AND BANKING REQUIRES OF THE PARTIES:

Non-profit Consumer Cooperative "Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA" (NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"):

Address: 109004, Mr. Moscow, st. Stanislavsky, house 22, Page. 2, Pom. 11; OGRN 1207700383087,

KPP 770901001, INN 9709066128, Tel. +7(495)7662024; e-mail: info@nposz.ru; Website: www.nposz.ru

Bank details:

Account No40703810325000000023

Branch "Central" of VTB Bank (PAO) in Moscow;

Correspondent account No. 30101810145250000411 in GU BANK OF RUSSIA by CFO Moscow

BIC 044525411/ INN 7702070139/ KPP 770943002

OKPO 01929672/ OKATO45296590000

Bank address: 107031, Russia, Moscow, st. Kuznetsky Bridge, 17, p. 1

cooperative member:

….

Legal address:

INN/KPP ..

OGRN ....

Phone: .....

Email: ...

Bank details:

p/s: ...

c/s: ...

BIC...

NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA":

Chairman of the Board


______________________ / A.I. Berdnikov

MP

cooperative member:

…

…_____________________ /.. /

MP

Date: "..........2025g.z

Forms of entry and application · Full published text

Official Letter Template

Source Status: Sample

An official letter template — an example of the cooperative’s business correspondence.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/blank-pismo.html

Open on the site

Non-profit Consumer Cooperative

Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA"

(NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA")

Legal Address: 109004, Moscow, st. Stanislavsky, 22, p. 2, room 11

Actual address and address for correspondence: 109004, Moscow, st. Stanislavsky, 22, p. 2, room 11

Site:HYPERLINK "https://nposz.ru" https://nposz.ru E-mail: info@nposz.ru Tel. +7(499) 649-51-21

OGRN 1207700383087, INN 9709066128, KPP 770901001

"___" _______ 2025 g.No 175-KP

In reply to No. _____ dated “___” ________20____

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

Dear ________________!


LETTER OF INFORMATION

(investment commercial offer)

the Chairman of the Board

the Specialized Fund of the SFSR

Lebedev A.I.

Dear Alexander Ivanovich.

The activities of Company _________ are founded on directions for personal, social, technological and civilisational development based on the Vector of Deep Active Unity (VGDE), because without a development vector all energy dissipates.

VGDE does not replace existing value systems; it serves as a universal framework for aligning decisions under conditions of high complexity and uncertainty, and proceeds from the premise that:

Man and society are not opposed to each other.

Technology should be used for development, not exclusion.

Economics is inseparable from ethics.

The state is a form of collective responsibility, not a form of coercion.

As financial support for investment development programs, the International Unified Reserve and Monetary Unit (MURDE) is used for:

intersystem calculations;

long-term reserve value;

ensuring the sustainability of sovereign economies;

Financing of socially significant and civilizational programs.

We considered your proposals, presented in the form of CIVIL INITIATIVE on the topic: Public-state partnership with Targeted Social Capital, as a form of evolutionary development of Russia, improving the well-being of the People of Russia, developing local self-government, strengthening statehood and the vertical of presidential power.

Since the Concept of CIVIL INITIATIVE and the investment projects proposed for its implementation correspond to the main provisions of the mission, goals and objectives of the Company _____________, we are ready to take part in the implementation of the proposed Programs and Projects, including by attracting investment financing.

Specific terms of financing will be determined when agreeing on the list of joint investment projects.

Signature__________________

Person carrying out the work:

Tel: _________; Emai.__________

INCLUDEPICTURE "https://static.tildacdn.com/tild3265-6165-4137-b862-656664343737/024f9530-2e0f-4d9e-b.jpg" \* MERGEFORMATINETINCLUDEPICTURE "https://storage.yandexcloud.net/sv-2020/uploads/9f/c553d733acb6cd42a48d8c1d9699ca.png" \* MERGEFORMATINETINCLUDEPICTURE "https://www.gz.moomap.ru/images/tild3934-3630-4339-b339-316266633131__cgmlogo.png" \* MERGEFORMATINET

Forms of entry and application · Card · document on request

Application of a legal entity for admission (form and sample)

Source Status: Sample

A membership application package for organisations: an application, applicant questionnaire and membership agreement.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

Only a catalogue card is published in the library. The full document is available on request; its contents are not included in this compilation.

Open on the site

Forms of entry and application · Full published text

Official Cooperative Letterhead

Source Status: Sample

Official cooperative letterhead — an example of how to format outgoing documents.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/blank.html

Open on the site

Non-profit Consumer Cooperative

Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA"

(NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA")

Legal Address: 109004, Moscow, st. Stanislavsky, 22, p. 2, room 11

Actual address and address for correspondence: 109004, Moscow, st. Stanislavsky, 22, p. 2, room 11

Site:HYPERLINK "https://nposz.ru" https://nposz.ru E-mail: info@nposz.ru Tel. +7(499) 649-51-21

OGRN 1207700383087, INN 9709066128, KPP 770901001

"___" _______ 2025 g.No 175-KP

In reply to No. _____ dated “___” ________20____

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________

Dear ________________!

Person carrying out the work:

Tel: _________; Emai.__________

INCLUDEPICTURE "https://static.tildacdn.com/tild3265-6165-4137-b862-656664343737/024f9530-2e0f-4d9e-b.jpg" \* MERGEFORMATINETINCLUDEPICTURE "https://storage.yandexcloud.net/sv-2020/uploads/9f/c553d733acb6cd42a48d8c1d9699ca.png" \* MERGEFORMATINETINCLUDEPICTURE "https://www.gz.moomap.ru/images/tild3934-3630-4339-b339-316266633131__cgmlogo.png" \* MERGEFORMATINET

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Territorial and sectoral projects

Library resources on the development of Dagestan and Kabardino-Balkaria, infrastructure, industry, unmanned systems and national projects. This is a collection of sources with their original statuses preserved.

Materials: 29 · with full text: 27 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Project materials · Full published text

Strategiya-razvitiya-AO-KAVKAZ.RF-do-2031-g

Source status: archive

The development strategy of KAVKAZ.RF JSC up to 2031 is a reference context.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/strategiya-razvitiya-ao-kavkaz-rf-do-2031-g.html

Open on the site

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF KAVKAZ.RF JSC 2026 YEARS AND FORWARDS 2031 YEARS

Moscow 2022

APPROVED by the Board of Directors of KAVKAZ.RF JSC Protocol No. 106 from "28" December 2022 g.

2

Table of contents

1. General provisions of the Strategy……………………………………………………………………......................

2. Mission, vision, goals, objectives, principles and approaches

3. Priority areas of the Strategy………………………………………………………………………

4. Marketing agency………………………………………………………………………………………………..

5. Investment policy and tools for the implementation of the Strategy.

6. Stages and roadmap for implementing the Strategy………………………………

7. Necessary resources for the implementation of the Strategy ...................................................

8. Motivation system and key performance indicators of the Company

for the implementation of the Strategy .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

9. Managing the risks of implementing the Strategy.................................................................

10. Monitoring and control of the implementation of the Strategy ...................................................

4

7

9

12

17

22

25

27

32

35

3

4

1. General provisions of the Strategy

North Caucasus Federal District

The North Caucasus Federal District is a priority geostrategic macroregion of the Russian Federation, which occupies an important geo-economic and geopolitical position, being the Russian Federation with the countries of the Caucasus and the Middle East. At the same time, the overall level of the sphere and human capital of the macro-region is lower than the average indicators in the Russian Federation.

infrastructure,

Binding

Social

Transit

the corridor,

economy,

Main

Development

These circumstances cause special attention to its development by the Government of the Russian Federation and the demand for special mechanisms of state support, including a separate federal development institute aimed at helping solve the problems of the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District.

the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 30 April 2022 № 1089The Strategy of Socio-Economic Development of the North Caucasus Federal 2030 the main problems of the macroregion, development goals and objectives, priority areas of development and sectors of the economy.

period up to

County

the City

Following the discussion in the Government of the Russian Federation 2020 In the year of discussion of the problem of increasing the effectiveness of existing development institutions and the need to reform them, it was decided to 31 December 2020 (the Government of the Russian Federation 31.12.2020 № 3710-p) on the merger of the North Caucasus Resorts Joint Stock Company, the North Caucasus Development Corporation Joint Stock Company and the Elbrus Resort Joint Stock Company into a single Company. The merger of the companies was carried out by joining KSK JSC and Resort Elbrus JSC. Joint Institute for Development of North Caucasus Federal District, established on the basis of JSC "KSK", received a new name - joint-stock company "KAVKAZ.RF" (hereinafter - JSC "KAVKAZ.RF", the Company, the Institute for Development).

5

The sole shareholder of the Company is the Russian Federation (represented by the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation), whose share in the authorized capital is 100%.

The actual unification of development institutions on the basis of KSK JSC, which engaged in different approaches, requires the revision of all elements of the new emerging Company (ideology, goals and objectives, structure and management).

Utilized

Destinations

different

and

the University of London

The new Company is tasked not only with supporting and developing the tourism industry, but also with supporting projects aimed at developing priority sectors of the economy, as defined in the Strategy for the Socio-Economic Development of the North Caucasus Federal District for the period up to 2030 of the year, as well as investment projects included in the models of economic development of the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District, approved by the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation M.V. Mishustin (protocol solution from 26.11.2021 No MM-P47-33Ave).

The strategy takes into account the following strategic documents and regulations:

legal acts:

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 7 May 2018 № 204 On National Goals and Strategic Objectives of the Development of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2024 Year;

Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 21 July 2020 № 474 National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2030 Year;

Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 13 May 2017 № 208 Strategy of economic security of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030 Year;

Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 2 July 2021 № 400 On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation;

Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 16 January 2017 № 13 About approval of the Fundamentals of the state policy of regional development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025 Year;

The Strategy of Spatial Development of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2025 of the year (Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 13 February 2019 № 207-r);

Implementation plan of the Strategy of Spatial Development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025 of the year (Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 27 December 2019 № 3227-r);

6

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

the Strategy of the Federal Period of the Russian Federation 30 April 2022 № 1089-r);

the Social and Economic

North Caucasus (order)

2030 years

Development

County

to

State Program of the Russian Federation "Development of the North- (Decree of the Caucasian Federal Government of the Russian Federation of 15 April 2014 No 309);

up to 2030

Strategy of tourism development in the Russian Federation for the period up to 2035 of the year (Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 20 September 2019 № 2129-r);

Development

Strategy of the Federation of 26 November 2018 No 2581-r);

(Order

Sanatorium and Resort Government

the Russian Federation Complex

Development

North Caucasus Strategy for the Federal District 2035 of the year (Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 7 March 2019 № 369-r);

Territory

Tourism

Plan for the implementation of the Strategy for the Development of Tourism in the North Caucasus Federal Territory (Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 5 July 2021 of 1802-r);

County

2035

Year

to

activities and projects formed within the framework of models of economic development of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation that are part of the North Caucasus Federal District.

7

8

2. Mission, vision, goals, objectives, principles and approaches

The mission of the Society is to promote socio-economic policy in the territory of the North Caucasus Federal District in order to accelerate the pace of economic development of the macro-region and improve the standard of living of the population.

State

effective

Realization

The vision of KAVKAZ.RF is the core of the ecosystem of support for the development of the North Caucasus Federal District.

Values of the Society 1. Desire for partnerships with counterparties from among the bodies

government and business communities, public organizations.

2. Promoting innovation in all areas. 3. Attitude to employees as the main capital of the company. 4. Ensuring a systematic contribution to the socio-economic development of the NCFD. 5. Respect for the traditions and history of the peoples of the NCFD. 6. Promotion of sustainable development of the territories of the NCFD, careful attitude

to the unique natural landscapes of the North Caucasus.

The basic ideologue of the Society Diversity and partnership are the foundation of development.

The strategic goal of the Company is to promote the creation of an attractive investment environment in the North Caucasus Federal District and the implementation of projects aimed at unlocking the socio-economic potential of the North Caucasus Federal District and improving the living standards of the population of the macro-region. The Company achieves this goal by solving the following strategic tasks:

1. Assistance in the development of priority sectors of the economy of the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District, as defined in the Strategy for Social and Economic Development of the North Caucasus Federal District until 2030.

2. Attracting partners and investors, including national institutions

development and financial structures, in projects in the territory of the NCFD.

3. Ensuring equal and visible presence of the Company in all regions

SKFO.

4. Optimization and enhancement

efficiency of state participation in projects in the North Caucasus by searching for the most optimal measures for specific projects.

5. Implementation of non-financial support measures to find financial resources

and support the regions of the NCFD when they are received.

9

The creation of a single institute for the development of the North Caucasus Federal District is aimed at improving the efficiency of the Company's activities. In addition to changing the ideological component of the new development institution, the paradigm of the Society itself is changing.

1. The Society’s activities are based on the following system of principles: 2. Actions

transparent. The company implements projects that are significant and able to attract third-party (in cost-effective (bankable).

(b)banking,

The expert,

Systemic

Society

are

t.u.m.

and

3. The society is guided by the principles of sustainable high

Development *: responsible attitude of social responsibility; high quality of corporate governance.

to the environment;

In addition, the Corporation uses the following approaches in its activities:

• Ecosystems. The society considers the external environment of its activities as interrelated and transforming resources, and sees its role in harmonizing this system and giving it additional impetus to development.

The actors,

complex

System

• Formation

Partnerships. Society

A key player in attracting new partners, including national development institutions and financial structures to the macro-region, the main moderator in the creation of partnerships in the territory of the North Caucasus Federal District.

He speaks

Active

• Digital transformation. The Society is a development institution that seeks to bring digital technologies and solutions to development projects implemented in the North Caucasus Federal District.

• Work with the macroregion at different levels of government. The Company’s work is built on the system of business-oriented offices with the need to interact with partners within the macroregion and beyond, as well as ensure an equal and noticeable presence in all regions of the North Caucasus Federal District.

To ensure the strategic maneuver, the Company will re-engineer business processes - organizational transformation of the Company and the transition to a system of business-oriented offices. This transformation will introduce a design and product approach, as well as provide an "equal" and "noticeable" presence in all regions of the North Caucasus Federal District by strengthening linear functional links in contrast to the previous organizational structure of the Company, blurred in the accompanying business processes.

* The principles of ESG include three main components: environmental, social and governance.

10

11

3. Priorities of the Strategy

1. Developer of growth points

Society creates and develops growth points:

• resorts and significant tourist areas:

- existing projects: Arkhyz, Elbrus, Mamison, Veduchi, Armhi; - new projects: Caspian coastal cluster, Cheget, Kezena Am, Dombay; - tourist territories of the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District;

• tourist ropeways and adjacent areas; • technoparks, industrial and agro-industrial parks; • wholesale distribution centers, fruit and vegetable storages.

The main approach in the implementation of the “Developer of growth points” direction is based on attracting partners to promising projects, joint development and bringing projects to a state where they form a positive EBITDA and are stable. After the release of the project for operational payback, the Company leaves it.

Within the framework of these projects, the Company may act as a management company.

The implementation of the direction will solve the following problems and tasks: • increase in the number of local centers of population growth and attraction; • Improving the level of development of the real sector of the economy; • removal of restrictions for the development of large, medium and small businesses; • Decrease in the share of the shadow economy; • Reduction of unemployment.

Figure 1. Estimated perspective budget for the implementation of the direction "Developer of growth points", billion rub.

83

39

32

12

2022

2023-2025

2026-2030

2022-2030

12

2. Shareholder-investor, financial consultant and investor of "breakthrough"

and large projects

The Company promotes the implementation of "breakthrough" and large projects in the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District (including projects to create sanatoriums and hotels, the implementation of electric transport infrastructure (including urban), etc.), in the field of housing and communal services, systematically influencing the solution of the main tasks of the economic development of the macroregion (initiates, enters projects as a shareholder, advises).

Fuel and Energy

Infrastructure

(Airports,

Complex

projects

E.g.,

and

and

The main approach in the implementation of the direction "Investor-shareholder, financial consultant and investor of "breakthrough" and large projects" is the initiation of new projects or entering into existing projects with the subsequent involvement of partners, "packaging" projects and organizing their financing, including monitoring and monitoring the implementation of projects, as well as providing the services of a financial consultant for the evaluation and "packaging" projects, attracting funding and informing about available state support measures, including measures to support federal development institutions.

The company can participate in the co-financing of projects.

In case of initiation of new projects or entry into existing projects with the subsequent involvement of partners, after reaching the project capacity / payback of the project, the Company (if appropriate) withdraws from it.

The implementation of the direction will solve the following problems and tasks:

• Improving the level of development of the real sector of the economy; • promotion of the level of development of financial and credit sphere; • increase in the number of local centers of population growth and attraction; • Reduction of unemployment; • elimination of bottlenecks in the transport system of the macroregion.

Figure 2. Estimated perspective budget for the implementation of the direction "Investor-shareholder, financial consultant and investor of "breakthrough" and large projects", billion rub.

47

27

15

5

2022

2023-2025

2026-2030 2022-2030

13

3. Developer of standard solutions and business consultant of small business entities

and medium-sized enterprises

Society

Supports

small and medium-sized enterprises in the framework of interaction with regional development corporations through the promotion of "box" (typical) solutions:

implementation of projects

Subjects

• glamming, small hotel complexes, roadside service

complexes;

• greenhouses, family farms, fruit and vegetable storage; • Warehouse complexes and parking.

Elaboration

Economically

The main approach in the implementation of the direction "Development of standard solutions and business consultant of small and medium-sized businesses" is potentially the search for scalable business plans and financial models according to the standards of SME Corporation JSC and financial organizations - partners in order to bring them to compliance with the parameters of "box" / standard solutions. After that, the Company transfers projects to regional development corporations for promotion and co-finances them if necessary.

Eligible

assistance

Reworked

projects,

and

the University of London

The implementation of the direction will solve the following problems and tasks:

• decrease in the share of the shadow sector of the economy; • promotion of the level of development of the financial and credit sphere; • decrease in unemployment; • decrease in the number of depressed rural mountainous areas.

Figure 3. The estimated prospective budget for the implementation of the direction "Developer of standard solutions and business consultant of small and medium-sized businesses" billion rub.

2,4

2,1

0,3

0

2022

2023-2025

2026-2030 2022-2030

14

15

4. Marketing Agency

The Company forms and comprehensively promotes a positive investment image of the North Caucasus Federal District, increases the recognition of the territories and brands of the North Caucasus Federal District, the Company’s brand and products in Russia and the world, and forms a quality mark. In addition, the promotion of the Company in the business environment of new business ideas and niches for the implementation of projects in the territory of the North Caucasus Federal District.

Formation

Executes

search,

and

Taking into account the strategic positioning and goal-setting, principles and approaches to the organization of activities, the Company forms the most appropriate to the specified conditions architecture of the Company's brand - a hybrid, combining the architecture structure of the Company-brand * (strategy when products act as a sub-brand under a parent brand) and the House of Brands ** (strategy when individual products and services are considered as separate brands) depending on the specific situation and project. Hybrid architecture with development flexibility. In this case, the brand expansion strategy will be used.

use

Retaining

will allow

Strong

brand,

When choosing marketing communications, the priority is given to indirect communications (BTL-communications (below the line, i.e. “under the line”)): expanding public relations, sales promotion and direct marketing, adapted to the tools and directions of the digital transformation strategy.

Event marketing (event-marketing). The Company is the initiator and organizer of business and social events in the North Caucasus Federal and macro-regional level, actively participates in regional events, co-finances the participation of government and business in congress and exhibition events.

Content marketing, social media marketing, social media brand reputation management, storytelling, influencer marketing (content-marketing, SMM, SMRM, storytelling, influencer-marketing). The Company uses modern electronic means of communication for the formation and maintenance of branded communities, reputation management, content formation, joint search and formation of ideas for the development of the North Caucasus, etc.

partner organizations,

Agents

influence,

C

Them

Sales (sales

promotion). Within the framework of

Cooperation Stimulation with regional administrations and development institutions The Company promotes the developed "box" solutions for small businesses, co-financing stimulating and the possibility of direct and indirect advertising of projects through the Company's channels. Also, the Company carries out the program "Quality Mark" - a system of assigning the most high-quality and popular products produced in the North-Eastern Federal District, a special sign with the right to use it by manufacturers of products to promote goods and services and the Company's obligations to promote these products through its channels.

BBQ

Implementation

*Branded House **House of Brands

16

(direct

Marketing

marketing)

Direct interaction with a narrow segmented audience. As a result of the use of its own database and the database of regional authorities, as well as the activities carried out by entrepreneurs, the Company and the management of companies implementing projects in the territory of the NCFD, informing about the capabilities of the Company to assist in the implementation of projects and advising on the details of a possible partnership.

Executes

Meetings

For

C

The implementation of the direction will solve the following problems and tasks:

• promotion of a positive investment image of the NCFD; • realization of the potential of priority sectors of the economy; • increase in the level of development of the real sector of the economy.

Figure 4. The estimated prospective budget for the implementation of the direction "Marketing Agency", billion rub.

1,1

0,8

0,2

0,05

2022

2023-2025

2026-2030 2022-2030

17

5. Personnel operator

The company promotes the management of labor migration, as well as the improvement of training and retraining of labor resources in the North Caucasus Federal District.

Practice-Oriented

programs

The main approach in the implementation of the "Personnel Operator" direction is the creation and development of an information system that provides analysis and forecast of the labor market and the personnel needs of the economy of the North Caucasus Federal District and other subjects of the Russian Federation (by professions, specialties, areas of training). The Company assists employment services and recruiting agencies in improving the system of search and selection of personnel for work on rotational projects of implementation by the method in the North Caucasus Federal District and other subjects of the Russian Federation.

Investment

Large-scale

the University of London

Higher Education

The Company also organizes with organizations of primary, secondary practice-oriented and resource programs, co-financing them if necessary.

Vocational Training

Education Retraining

Labor

and

The implementation of the direction will solve the following problems and tasks:

• Reduction of unemployment; • improving the quality of services in the field of vocational education; • Involvement of the labor resources of the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District in the implementation of regional

projects.

Figure 5. Estimated perspective budget for the implementation of the "Personnel Operator" direction, billion rubles.

0,3

0,2

0,1

0

2022

2023-2025

2026-2030 2022-2030

18

6. Organizer of socially-oriented practices

The Company, together with federal executive authorities, development institutions, specialized organizations, professional education organizations, organizes the promotion of advanced socially oriented practices in the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District:

• human capital development (worldskills, hackathons, case championships,

"boiling points", etc.);

• Social Entrepreneurship; • Social projects of non-profit organizations.

Best

Operators

practices" - selection

The main approach in the implementation of the direction "Organizer of socially-oriented social-oriented practices, the creation in partnership with them adapted to the regions of the NCFD programs and projects. The company organizes the implementation of selected practices in the macroregion in conjunction with regional development institutions, and also initiates the development of its own socially-oriented thematic forums and other events in the regions. In the future, the Company coordinates the implementation of socially-oriented synergistic effect in order to obtain a federal district.

Holding

practices,

Practitioners

The implementation of this direction will contribute to the creation and development of a favorable living environment for residents of the macroregion, the formation of their active social position, improving the standard of living of citizens, including socially vulnerable categories of the population.

Human capital development practices are aimed at developing modern competencies and skills that increase the level of their adaptation to the ongoing social and economic processes and encourage them to actively participate in these processes.

The implementation of the direction will solve the following problems and tasks:

• Improving the accessibility and quality of socially-oriented practices

for the population of the regions of the NCFD;

• increase in social activity in the NCFD, increase in the number of social projects

orientation;

• involvement of youth in social practices, self-realization of youth;

development of additional skills, advanced training;

• Entrepreneurship development.

19

Figure 6. Estimated perspective budget for the implementation of the direction "Organizer of socially-oriented practices", million rubles.

7

5

2

0

2022

2023-2025

2026-2030 2022-2030

20

21

5. Investment policy and tools for the implementation of the Strategy

The Company’s investment policy is aimed at facilitating the implementation of cost-effective and socially significant projects in the NCFD aimed at implementing the goals and objectives set for the Company within the framework of this strategy, including the creation of an investment attractive environment in the macroregion.

Currently, the Regulations on the Company’s Investment Policy, approved by Order No. 985Р-РМ of the Minister of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, M. G. Reshetnikov, dated 11 November 2022, provide for the following activities of the Company:

Investment

Implementation

Tools

• debt financing of initiators (provision of targeted loans to initiators) in the framework of joint transactions with credit organizations, and (or) development institutions, and (or) other legal entities;

• targeted loan financing of credit institutions for subsequent lending in order to implement investment projects in the North Caucasus Federal District;

• payment of shares of closed mutual funds under the management of the limited liability company "KRSK - Asset Management", which invests the funds of mutual funds in the form of debt financing of the initiators (provision of targeted loans to the initiators);

• debt financing of initiators (provision of targeted loans to initiators) under guarantees of credit institutions, and (or) VEB.RF, and (or) SME Corporation JSC.

within

Activities

Investment

V provides financing for investment projects in priority sectors of the economy in the Strategy of socio-economic entities of the NCFD, certain development of the NCFD to 2030 years, including those included in the models of economic development of the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District, approved 26 November 2021 Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation M.V. Mishustin (Minutes of the Meeting with the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation 26 November 2021 No MM-P47-33Ave).

Society

An important condition for the implementation of the Strategy and the implementation of the investment policy is the introduction of a new set of investment and financial instruments that will complement the federal instruments of state support for other development institutions, taking into account the peculiarities and specific problems of the NCFD.

The use of new investment and financial instruments will improve the quality of investment projects that claim external financing, reduce the financial risks of investment projects in order to increase their attractiveness for financial and credit institutions and development institutions, increase the profitability of investment projects implemented in the territory of the NCFD, and also increase the multiplier effects.

22

The introduction of a new set of investment and financial instruments will require actions and initiatives on the part of the Company to change the approaches, principles and criteria for investing in the Company, as well as the federal and corporate regulatory framework.

To implement the Strategy, the possibility of using the following tools will be explored.

1. Debt and (or) equity financing of projects

The company selects partner organizations that implement projects in the North Caucasus Federal District that systematically affect the solution of the main tasks of the economic development of the macroregion. The company is part of the capital and management bodies of existing and newly formed companies and organizations (creates joint ventures), which implement specific projects, including under concession agreements, or issue loans for the implementation of projects. The company may initiate projects, including concession projects. The company provides borrowed equity financing of projects, helps, if necessary, attract additional external financing, controls the progress of projects.

Receiving

projects;

Partly

Risks

Myself

the City

2. Support for projects in the pre-investment phase (bridge-

financing)

Bridge financing (from English bridge - "bridge") - a short-term loan that is taken to cover the costs of the pre-investment phase in anticipation of the main funding.

Valuation

Promising

Project society and obtaining long-term loan financing. Further, the Company provides loan financing for the launch of the project and monitors the progress of the pre-investment phase of the project, including the provision of consulting services, and obtaining long-term financing.

Investment

Ideas

3. Ready-made business solutions (“typical products”) for small businesses

and medium-sized enterprises

Development and implementation of ready-made business solutions and "typical products" of entrepreneurship for the implementation of the investment economies of the North Caucasus Federal District, priority jointly financed by the Company with credit and financial organizations and development institutions.

the Small Business Unit

Middle

projects

Sectors

and

This tool includes:

• Formation of a catalogue of “typical products” in priority sectors

economy;

• creation

typical business plans,

Feasibility studies

and financial models;

23

• - organization of co-financing of "typical products" (participation in capital, debt

with fixed

income;

Exit

the City

including financing options);

• bank support of projects (consultations and assistance in obtaining

Loan financing);

• administrative land support; • assistance in financing technological connections; • assistance in project promotion (sales, marketing, IT, integration

market, certification and standardization).

4. Increasing market value and investment attractiveness

Land (Land Development)

–

Investment

Land development involves increasing the value of a land plot through the development of a concept of its development, the formation of urban planning documentation, the construction of infrastructure, etc. for the purpose of further sale / lease of a land plot or its individual parts.

instrument,

The company analyzes promising growth points in urban agglomerations, ski clusters, transport and logistics corridors, etc. Further, the Company develops a project for the development of the territory at a promising growth point, buys or leases a land plot, establishes a project management company.

Executes

construction/reconstruction

Engineering Society and Transport Infrastructure Project. Also, the Company searches for potential residents and provides them with formed and provided with the necessary infrastructure land plots, provides other standard services of the Criminal Code, including assistance in obtaining support measures. Role of the Company - management company of development projects in:

• projects

Redevelopment

Old

Industrial

Zones

the University of London

Urban

agglomerations;

• projects of industrial land development — creation and management

industrial parks;

• projects of land development of ski and sanatorium-recreational

Resorts.

5. Joint

implementation of investment, including innovative, projects, carried out in the form of investment partnerships

Investment

Activities

Objectives

the University of London

Investment partnership agreement (DIT) is a form of joint investment activities of partners to invest common property in investment projects. Project investment commitments are disclosed as funding becomes necessary.

24

The company forms a data bank on projects that have problems with bank financing, assesses their prospects, risk profile. It is possible to form pools of projects of one industry, for example, tourism or agriculture. Further, the Company searches for investment partners (companies) for the development of projects experiencing problems with bank financing, and organizes the signing of DIT. The company enters DIT as a managing partner, invests its own funds and controls the fulfillment of obligations by fellow investors, as well as the progress and results of projects.

6. Support for socially-oriented practices

Social entrepreneurship is a business aimed at achieving socially useful goals and contributing to solving social problems of citizens and society, in particular:

• Employment of socially vulnerable categories of population; • production of goods and services for socially vulnerable categories of people; • conducting activities aimed at achieving socially useful goals and contributing to the solution of social problems (organization of recreation and rehabilitation of children, cultural and educational activities, etc.).

Pedagogical and Social

services,

The company selects the best operators of socially-oriented practices, and creates projects adapted to the regions of the NCFD in partnership with them. Further, he organizes, together with local development institutions, the implementation of selected practices, and also initiates the development of own practices in the regions, holding thematic forums and other events.

25

26

6. Stages and road map for the implementation of the Strategy

The strategy is implemented in three stages in the following terms: • Stage I - Reengineering of management approaches and implementation of "fast"

projects in 2022.

• Stage II - Launch of design and product activities in 2023 - 2025 years. • Stage III - Launch of the second stage of "breakthrough" and interregional

investment projects in 2026 - 2030 years.

Stage I - Reengineering of management approaches and implementation of "fast" projects in 2022

The first stage of the Strategy is aimed at introducing new tools of work into the Company’s activities.

Table 1. The first stage of the implementation of the Roadmap Strategy

No Event

Time frame for implementation

Responsible Expected Results

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

Adoption of the Strategy for the Development of Society

31.12.2022

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Board of Directors approved Strategy

Approval of the digital transformation strategy and modernization of the Company’s information portal

31.12.2022

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Approval of the new investment policy of the Company

31.12.2022

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

The Strategy of Digital Transformation of Society approved by the Board of Directors

Updated information portal on the Internet Approved by the Board of Directors new Regulation on the Company's investment policy

Conclusion of partnership agreements with federal development institutions on joint mechanisms Development of priority projects in the field of tourism (including the organization of development of master plans of tourist territories)

31.12.2022

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Signed agreements

31.12.2022

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Started priority projects in the tourism sector

Selection of socially oriented practices

31.12.2022

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Approval of the Company’s adjusted KPIs and management for the years 2023, 2024 and 2025

31.12.2022

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Partnership agreements have been concluded, the first projects have been launched

Approved by the Board of Directors of KPE Company and Management for 2023-2024.

27

Phase II - Launch of design and product activities (2023 - 2025 years)

Stage

Second

Implementation of the organizational strategy of transformation of the Company, as well as ensuring the launch of “breakthrough” and large interregional investment projects in priority sectors of the economy of the North Caucasus Federal District. Much of the success of this stage will depend on the effectiveness of the further work of the Company as a whole.

Linked

C

Table 2. The second stage of the implementation of the Roadmap Strategy

No Event

Approval of the long-term development program (DDP) of the Company Organizational and functional restructuring of the Company - approval of the new organizational structure and staffing of the Company

Approval of the Company's Corporate Code

Formation of a catalog of "typical products / solutions" for SMEs (concept, business plan, financial model) Approval of a marketing strategy, including the concept of brand architecture of JSC "KAVKAZ.RF" and a PR and GR program to promote the investment attractiveness of SKFO Implementation of new projects in the field of industry, agriculture, new technologies, logistics, urban projects Implementation of the project "Managed labor pendulum migration"

Launch of a program for the implementation of "typical products / solutions" for SMEs in the regions of the NCFD

Time frame for implementation

2023

Responsible Expected Results

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Approved by the Board of Directors of DPR Company

2023

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

The new organizational structure of the Society was approved

2023

2023

2023

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Approved the provision on payment and bonuses Approved the corporate code of the Company

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Catalog of "typical products" developed

2023-2025

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

2023-2025

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Strategy for promotion is approved

positive investment image of NCFD

New jobs created, extra-budgetary investments attracted

2023-2025

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Reduced unemployment

2023-2025

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

Implementation of strategic and program documents of the Company

2023-2025

JSC "KAVKAZ.RF"

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

New jobs created, extra-budgetary investments attracted

Increased investment and social attractiveness of NCFD

28

Stage III - Launch of the second phase of "breakthrough" and interregional investment projects (2026 - 2030 years)

"Breakthroughs"

At the third stage of implementation of the Strategy, the Company will ensure the launch of the second stage of interregional projects in priority sectors of the economy of the North Caucasus Federal District. The implementation of the activities of this stage is aimed at strengthening the results achieved at the previous stage and increasing the efficiency and multiplier effect of the start of the implementation of the first wave projects.

Investment

and

29

7. Necessary Resources for the Strategy Implementation

Implementation of the Company’s Strategy is aimed primarily at creating a critical mass of new breakthrough projects in the North Caucasus Federal District, which will allow the macro-region economy to create conditions for the emergence of projects in the field of small and medium-sized businesses in priority sectors of the economy, as well as ensure the growth of the revenue part of the budgets of the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District.

competitiveness

significantly

raise

An important condition for the implementation of the Strategy is the consolidation of resources and cooperation of all stakeholders. The implementation of the goals and objectives of the Strategy is possible with the support of state authorities and with the active involvement and participation of federal development institutions, large businesses and financial institutions.

The resource support of the Strategy is built in such a way that on the one hand it increases the financing of specific projects for the development of the NCFD, and on the other hand it reduces the costs of maintaining supporting organizations and infrastructure.

Table 3 and 4 summarize the main sources of financing for the implementation of the Strategy, including the Company's own revenues, and the main expected areas of spending. The final amounts and budget should be clarified based on the results of the development and coordination of the Company’s long-term development program, taking into account the fact that there is a list of new projects for which more funding is needed than is currently provided.

Table 3. Evaluation of resources for the implementation of the Strategy (billion rub.) *, **

Resources

2022

2023-2025

2026-2030 2022-2030

1. Targeted allocation of budget investments

including the budgetary balances previously provided to the Company for the establishment of SEZ infrastructure at the beginning of the relevant periods

2. Investment support funds

including the balances of budget allocations previously provided to the Company for the implementation of investment projects outside the SEZ at the beginning of the relevant periods

3. Subsidy for the maintenance of the Company

4. Tourism development grant

5. Investment income

6. Revenues from ski passes, rent

7. Revenues from the sale of 25% shares of JSC "UK Arkhyz"

9

9

0

15

0,7

0,2

0,3

2

0,0

28

7

4

10

1,9

0,9

1,7

4

5,7

26

0

25

3

2,3

1,5

6,6

11

0,0

63

9

29

15

4,8

2,6

8,3

17

5,7

30

Resources

8. Income from deposits

Total financial support including balances at the start of the respective periods. Total financial support excluding balances at the start of the respective periods.

2022

2023-2025

2026-2030 2022-2030

1,0

37

13

1,4

63

47

0,0

74

72

2,4

156

132

Notes: * Final amounts for the resource support of the strategy should be adjusted after approval of the long-term development program of the Company. ** Total limits of budget obligations: 2022 St Petersburg. – 10 billion rub., 2023-2025 Gov. – 29 billion rub., 2026-2030 Gov. – 55 billion RUB (subject to preservation of average annual limits of budget obligations for previous periods), 2022-2030 Gov. – 94 billion rub. The additional budget requirement for the federal budget 5 billion The rupees that are required 2023 – 2025 Total expenditure Total own income for the period 2022 – 2030 Mr. Will 33 billion roubles.

Table 4. Assessment of the expenditure of funds in the areas of the Company's activities 2030 years (billion rub.)

Areas

2022

2023-2025

2026-2030 2022-2030

1. Priorities of the Strategy

1.1. Developer of growth points

1.2. Shareholder-investor, financial consultant and investor of "breakthrough" and large projects

1.3. Developer of standard solutions and business consultant for small and medium-sized businesses

1.4. Marketing Agency

1.5. Personnel operator

1.6. Organizer of socially oriented practices 2. Expenses for the maintenance of resorts and the Society

Total expenditure

17

12

5

0

0,05

0

0

3

20

54

39

15

0,3

0,2

0,2

62

32

27

2,1

0,8

0,1

134

83

47

2,4

1,1

0,3

0,002

0,005

0,007

7

62

12

74

22

156

Regional

In addition to financial resources for the implementation of the Strategy, administrative resources of federal executive bodies and local executive self-government are used. The attraction of this type of resources is carried out in the framework of cooperation and existing and interaction both of a general nature, and in connection with the implementation of individual projects.

Legislation

treaties

bodies

bodies

The authorities,

About

31

32

8. Motivation system and key performance indicators of the Company for the implementation of the Strategy

The motivation system of the Company’s personnel is aimed at achieving the Company’s strategic goals and objectives. It is based on the following principles:

• Transparency and openness to all employees; • Combination of tangible and intangible instruments; • assistance

Achievements

High

Productivity

Labor

and performance;

• assistance in achieving high quality of activity; • assistance in maintaining and increasing employee loyalty; • assistance in attracting qualified employees to the organization; • accounting of the degree of achievement of goals (KPI) of the organization as a whole, structural

departments and employees directly;

• allocation of constant and variable parts of material remuneration, and determination of their optimal ratio for various categories of employees; • periodic motivation;

Intangible

Tools

Update

System

• Building an attractive employer brand; • Formation, maintenance and development

modern corporate culture, which is based on the following values: responsibility for the result; proactive position; customer orientation; welcoming changes; self-improvement.

Changes and based on:

Motivation systems are produced as needed

• analysis

Levels

achievements

Strategic

Objectives

organizations

over a number of years;

• Employee satisfaction analysis conducted

on a periodic basis;

• Analysis of changes (innovations) in the practice of applying motivational measures

in other companies and organizations;

• analysis of the dynamics of vacancies and qualifications of applicants for vacant positions to assess the competitiveness of working conditions in the Company regarding the working conditions of other companies searching for similar personnel.

In order to determine the key performance indicators of the Company for the implementation of the Strategy, the following management objects were selected:

• finances of the Company; • operating activities of the Company; • beneficiaries

Face

the University of London

entrepreneurs,

Executors

investment activities in the NCFD;

• beneficiaries represented by the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District, in whose territory

projects are being implemented with the participation of KAVKAZ.RF JSC;

• Beneficiaries

the Ministry 's

Economic Development

The Russian Federation is the sole shareholder of the Company.

33

These control objects form three groups of control processes:

1. Management of the internal environment of the Society; 2. Management of the Company’s Direct Environmental Impact; 3. Management of the external environment of the indirect impact of the Society.

Based on the analysis of the set of objects and management processes, 3 groups of key indicators of the Company’s performance are allocated:

• financial and economic performance of the Company

Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 28.12.2020 of 3579-r;

• the NCFD Development Strategy 's 2030 years; • indicators of the Company's Strategy.

The key targets of the Company’s activities in relation to management facilities and methods of measuring KPIs are presented in the table below.

Table 5. Key performance indicators of the Company for the implementation of the Strategy

Indicators of achievement of the objectives of the Strategy of socio-economic development of the North Caucasus Federal District up to 2030

№

Indicators

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

1.

1.1.

The number of direct and indirect jobs created and saved by SEZ residents and within the framework of investment projects implemented with the participation of KAVKAZ.RF (accumulated), jobs

These include:

The number of direct created and saved jobs by SEZ residents and within investment projects implemented with the participation of KAVKAZ.RF (accumulated total), places

6 000 7 400 9 500 14 300 18 700 26 200 38 900 54 900 71 600

1 755

2 200 2 800 4 200 5 500

7 700 11 200 16 000 27 000

34

№

Indicators

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2.

Number of tourists who visited tourist sites created with the participation of JSC "KAVKAZ.RF", thousand people *

The share of extra-budgetary investments attracted with the assistance of KAVKAZ.RF to the physical volume of investments in fixed assets, except for investments of infrastructure monopolies (federal projects) and budget allocations of the federal budget, by 2020, %

Average rank of the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District in terms of investment risk within the rating of RAEX investment attractiveness of the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District, place

3.

4.

1 250 1 400 1 500 1 750

2 100

2 600 3 000

3 500

4 000

1,4

2,7

4,9

7,0

10,5

15,1

20,3

25,6

30,5

81

77

73

70

66

62

58

54

50

35

Indicators of achievement of the objectives of the Company Strategy

№

Indicators

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

Ratio of attracted extra-budgetary investments in projects in the territory of the North Caucasus Federal District to the investments of Kavkaz.RF JSC within the framework of the investment policy, rub/ 1 rub. Society

Ratio of attracted extra-budgetary investments of SEZ residents to the investments of KAVKAZ.RF JSC in the development of SEZ infrastructure, rub. / 1 rub. Society

The volume of attracted investments of federal development institutions with the assistance of KAVKAZ.RF JSC, RUB million

5 .

6 .

7 .

0,6 **

0,2 **

0,6

1,4

1,7

2,3

3,3

4,5

4,5

4,5

0,3

0,8

1,3

3,6

4,8

5,1

5,3

5,5

0

1 000

3 000

5 000

8 000

10 000

13 000

18 000

25 000

Financial and economic indicators (according to the order of the Government of the Russian Federation from 28.12.2020 No 3579-r)

8.

9.

Operating expenses to assets under management (Cost to assets), %

Profitability ratio of investments in resorts (EBITDA / Investments), %

1,5

1,5

1,5

1,5

1,5

1,5

1,5

1,5

1,5

2

3

3

3

3

4

4

5

5

Notes: * Including an estimate of the number of tourists visiting the all-season tourist and recreation complex "Archyz". ** The average value for the period 2020 – 2022 Gov.

36

The implementation of the Strategy of KAVKAZ.RF JSC will contribute to the implementation of the Strategy for the Development of the North Caucasus Federal District until 2030 and the Strategy for the Development of Tourism in the Territory of the North Caucasus Federal District until 2035. Support for new projects and implementation of priority initiatives will accelerate the growth rate of investment in fixed assets, increase employment in the economy, increase the average per capita income of the population living in the territory of the North Caucasus Federal District, implement projects to develop the urban environment in cities and rural settlements, and ultimately improve the quality of life of the population of the macro-region. In the field of tourism, new resorts will be created, priority tourist areas will be developed, as well as extrabudgetary investments will be attracted in the development of tourist infrastructure and room fund, new jobs will be created.

Implementation of the Strategy of KAVKAZ.RF will ensure 8 % the total number of new (direct) jobs created before 2030 the implementation of "breakthrough" investment projects that are part of the models of economic development of the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District, approved 26 November 2021 Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation M.V. Mishustin, as well as provide 23 % The total amount of extra-budgetary investments that will be made before 2030 the Year of Implementation of “Breakthrough” Investment Projects.

37

38

9. Risk management of Strategy implementation

When implementing the Strategy, the Company takes into account the main risks that may complicate the solution of the tasks for the development of the NCFD facing the Company.

Table 6. The main risks of implementing the Strategy

Type of risk

Description

Degree of influence

Probability of attack

Management tools

Increasing sanctions pressure on the Russian Federation and the deterioration of macroeconomic indicators of the country's development, as a result of the reduction of financial opportunities for financing activities for the development of the Northern Federal District, including budget funds from the federal budget, and the implementation of projects of the Company

1.

Economic risks

High

High

2.

Financial risks

3.

Market Risks

Low efficiency of projects implemented in the territory of the NCFD, as a result of the lack of payback of projects, tax returns and return on investment

Reduction of domestic demand for goods and services produced and rendered in the territory of the North-Eastern Federal District, as a result of a decrease in the level of incomes of the population, changes in the price situation, geopolitical changes

High

High

High

Average

Search for new contractors from friendly countries. Assistance in reorienting the supply of expert-import products, in changing logistics chains.

Attraction of additional sources of financing and investment resources for the implementation of projects, conclusion of agreements with financial institutions, federal development institutions and large corporations to support and implement projects in the territory of the NCFD

Project management, project selection and support tools, involvement of federal development and financial institutions for project evaluation

Active PR campaign to promote the North Caucasus Federal District and improve the image of the region, cooperation and attracting large investors, support and implementation of advanced standards and services in tourism and the service sector

39

№

Type of risk

Description

Degree of influence

Probability of attack

Management tools

Decrease in the level of state and municipal administration in the territory of the federal district

4.

Political risks

Average

Average

5.

Legal risks

6.

Social risks

Deterioration of business conditions, which may lead to the departure of part of the business in the shadow sector of the economy, employment decline

loss of income, or other undesirable and

socially unacceptable business results

(until it is terminated), related to the observance of social rights,

guarantees and interests of individuals, communities and society as a whole

Low

Average

Average

Low

Building systemic relations with regional executive bodies and regional development institutions, participation and organization of additional professional programs for advanced training and professional retraining Financial instruments for project support, promotion of "typical ready-made solutions" for business, training programs for business

Making changes to the motivation system of the company and (or) wages, aimed at reducing social tension in the workforce.

Monitoring of social processes in the territories of the Company's projects

Active PR-support of the Company’s activities and projects implemented with its participation.

Monitoring and control of compliance with ESG- principles of the Company’s activities

40

41

10. Monitoring and monitoring the implementation of the Strategy

The implementation of the Strategy is monitored by regular monitoring of its implementation, during which the planned values of the Company’s key performance indicators for the implementation of the Strategy are compared with the actual ones. System monitoring involves conducting a comprehensive analysis of the Company’s main activities for the reporting year, assessing the achievement of the Company’s key performance indicators for the implementation of the Strategy, as well as the implementation of the activities of the Action Plan for the implementation of the Strategy.

Monitoring is carried out annually on the basis of the results of the Company’s work. In case of deviations of actual indicators from the target parameters, a list of corrective measures is carried out.

Nonconformities

Development

Reasons

analysis

and

The Strategy is updated taking into account the directives of the Government of the Russian Federation, the implementation of the strategy of socio-economic development of the North Caucasus Federal District until 2030, as well as other strategic documents of the development of the Russian Federation and the North Caucasus Federal District.

Adjustment based on the results of individual stages based on monitoring data.

« Developed

Events

Strategies

Implemented

The monitoring system and the necessary adjustment of the Strategy are formed on the basis of the official statistical reporting of Rosstat, information and analytical materials of the Company, as well as materials received from subsidiaries, federal and regional development institutions, the Russian regional federations that are members of the North-Eastern Federal District.

Executive

Subjects

bodies

Authorities

Based on annual monitoring, no later than 15 February the year following the reporting year, a report on the implementation of the Strategy and the implementation of the action plan is prepared with proposals for its adjustment.

42

43

Project materials · Full published text

Architecture of the World Public Assembly 2025

Source status: Project

Architecture of the World Public Assembly — a concept for a partnership initiative.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/arhitektura-vsemirnoi-obschestvennoi-assamblei-2025.html

Open on the site

Architecture of the World Public Assembly Programme

A New World of Conscious Unity

20-21 September 2025 Moscow, Russia,

World Trade Center

Plenary session

A NEW WORLD OF CONSCIOUS UNITY

Panel session

"Culture as the basis of trust on the way to harmony of the world"

Panel discussion

"Humanitarian modernization is an imperative for the development of modern civilization"

Panel discussion

"Senses as a strategic resource of development, society, state, man"

STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AND PUBLIC DIPLOMATY

HUMANITARIAN MODERNIZATION: MAN AS CENTER OF THE FUTURE

A New World of Conscious Unity

International integration associations. New architecture of the world

SCO — a space of trust between peoples

Community of common destiny

BRICS Dialogue and Partnership on Strengthening Solidarity and International Cooperation

Creative industries of BRICS countries

Commonwealth of Independent States: Conscious Unity

Latin America — Greater Eurasia: the era of new strategic opportunities

Africa in the Modern World: A New Era of Cooperation and Partnership

The phenomenon of public diplomacy

Leadership in international humanitarian and charitable projects

International cooperation in the scientific and educational sphere as a factor of sustainable development

International cooperation: science and education. Meeting of Rectors

Education and public diplomacy: spaces of mutual understanding

UNESCO Project: Uniting Humanity for Shared Values to Build a Better Future

Geniuses of the world - leaders of public opinion outside time and space

Congress of the World Organization of Writers WOW

Health-saving technologies of the peoples of the world

VALUES OF A NEW WORLD

SPIRITUAL AND CULTURAL UNITY

AND SERVICE TO VALUES

Responsibility

as the basis of the future

Meeting of the Scientific and Expert Council of the Assembly of Peoples of the World "Global Challenges for the Preservation and Development of Humanity"

Space: a space of peace, trust and cooperation

Spiritual culture — a space for the formation of meanings and values

Interreligious dialogue for the sake of preserving and strengthening spiritual and moral values

Diplomacy of Happiness as an International Practice of Building the Future

Spiritual unity for peace and humanity

Identity as the basis of development

Traditions as a resource of the future

Digital environment in the family and family in the digital environment

Diversity as a Resource of the World

Peacemaking — a strategy for the unification and prosperity of mankind

Children of the world: time to be friends

Family culture: Family — Family — People — Human race

Altai as a junction of civilizational worlds

International Youth Forum "Generation of Unity"

National sports as a model of international cooperation

Digital Media and Information

literacy: person, society, AI

Education and science - new horizons of development

Culture and interethnic dialogue: bridges between generations

Eurasian Forum of National Cultures and Equestrian Traditions "Constellation of the First"

Corporate Social Responsibility: Investing in the Future

Humanitarian values, public trust - the basis of sustainable development

Economic Relations

Adaptation of business in the context of changing geopolitical course of the economy

Economic integration and cultural diplomacy

New markets: experience, conclusions, proposals

Investing in Human Capital: From Ethics to Efficiency

A culture of trust: an economy built on values

The Winning Countries: Lessons from World War II and the Responsibility for Peace

From people’s trust to economies’ trust: humanitarian foundations of international partnership

The role of business in the integration of the economy in the context of global changes

Ecosystem of international business: presentation of projects

Culture of Memory and Historical Truth

International tourism in a multipolar world

Media in the service of humanity: opportunities, challenges and media builders of the future

New media as a tool for the service of humanity

Key challenges of the industry within the concept of a multipolar world

Media as a tool to protect against digital threats

International Trends

Media as a tool for shaping the image of the media builder of the future

International Youth Forum "Generation of Unity" International Public Forum

"Winner Countries: World War II Lesson and Responsibility for Peace" Congress of the World Organization of Writers (WOW) Final of the IV International Competition "Leader of People's Diplomacy"

International Media Forum "Media in Service to Humanity" Awarding the winners of the First Grant Competition of the Assembly of Peoples of the World "Trust and Unity" Business Forum "Social Responsibility of Business: Investing in the Future" Eurasian Forum of National Cultures and Equestrian Traditions "Constellation of the First" Confectionery Championship Moscow open WFRS

Project materials · Full published text

Unmanned Systems

Source status: Project

Materials in the direction of unmanned systems - project context.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/bespilotnye-sistemy.html

Open on the site

MeetingGovernments

On the agenda: on advanced financing for the construction and repair of educational institutions, on business support in border regions, on additional programs for training specialists in the field of unmanned technologies.

Opening remarks by Mikhail Mishustin:

Good afternoon, dear colleagues!

This week we honor our teachers. Yesterday was an anniversary date – 85The Year of Secondary Vocational Education. A 5 October We all celebrate Teacher's Day.

I sincerely want to congratulate all employees of this sphere - educators, teachers, teachers. Thank you from the bottom of our hearts for your responsible, selfless, very necessary and very difficult work. I wish you health and great success.

Quality development of domestic education, each of its level is, without a doubt, an absolute priority for us. Within the framework of the relevant national projects “Family” and “Youth and Children”, we are implementing a whole range of activities. First of all, we create and update the appropriate infrastructure.

Today, we will send six regions almost 4 billion Rubles in advance funding. These funds will be reallocated from the next two years to the current year. This will allow to complete the construction of schools and kindergartens, to carry out major repairs of educational buildings and dormitories of several technical schools.

The program of modernization of institutions of secondary vocational education is carried out at the initiative of the President. The head of state instructed to put them in order, equip the training base and infrastructure.

We will also provide for Belgorod, Bryansk, Kursk regions in addition to 2,3 billion Rubles. These resources will help them to upgrade and restore kindergartens and schools so that children learn in good, modern conditions. Here I would ask the Ministry of Education to strictly monitor the delivery of funds to the subjects of the Russian Federation and the implementation of all planned activities.

The Government has consistently undertaken such tasks. To help companies that were in difficult conditions, this year, I recall, allocated about 2 billion Rubles. This allowed them to maintain production, qualified specialists and compensate for part of the costs of wages.

Today we will send even more 4 billion In the Belgorod, Bryansk and Kursk regions within the framework of the program of comprehensive restoration of these territories, thanks to which enterprises will be able to receive subsidies and concessional loans, as well as funds for payment of insurance premiums in order to resume operations and reduce their costs, purchase the necessary equipment and establish the release of goods and services. This is especially necessary now. It is important to increase the sustainability of the business that creates jobs in these entities.

Order of 20 March 2025 No647-r

More 4 billion Rubles will be allocated from the federal budget 2025 In the same year, a number of regions set up a network of research and production centers for testing and competencies in the development of technologies for civil unmanned aircraft systems. Order on the distribution of these funds.

Subsidies will be received by seven regions whose projects won the competitive selection held on the platform of the State Industrial Information System. These are Yakutia, Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, Perm Krai, Nizhny Novgorod, Novgorod, Orenburg and Tula regions.

The work is carried out within the framework of the federal project "Development, standardization and serial production of UAS and components", which is part of the new national project "Unmanned aircraft systems".

Vitaly Saveliev held an expanded meeting on the development of the industry of unmanned aircraft systems

The Government Coordination Center, chaired by Deputy Prime Minister Vitaly Savelyev, held an expanded meeting on the development of the unmanned aircraft systems industry. The event was attended by representatives of the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Industry and Trade, the Ministry of Education, subjects, as well as manufacturers of unmanned aircraft systems and their operators. 

The participants presented current data on the production and use of advanced unmanned systems for various sectors of the economy, and also discussed a number of opportunities that contribute to the further development of the industry in terms of growth in production and use of UAVs. 

An important issue to stimulate the use of UAVs at various levels is the development of means of their identification and the further integration of unmanned aircraft systems into airspace. At the final stage of development is the introduction of a new class of airspace - H with the use of a simplified procedure for the use of airspace for the flight of unmanned aircraft. In addition, a unified system for identifying unmanned vehicles is being created on the basis of the ERA-GLONASS state information system. The practical implementation of these solutions will create additional opportunities for the opening of the sky in the regions for the use of unmanned aircraft. 

For 2024 The production volume of civil unmanned aircraft systems has grown more than a year ago 2,5 Time - s 6 Thousands of units before 16,4 Thousands of units compared to 2023 Year. Currently there are more 600 UAS and Component Manufacturers.

In addition, all participants of the meeting noted the importance of training for the ALS management, including the integration of veterans into civilian professions in the ALS industry. Thanks to the activities of the federal project "Personnel for unmanned aircraft systems" of the national project "Unmanned aircraft systems" in 2024 year prepared more than 10 thousand people. This year it is planned to train 5,6 thousand people. In total, according to the programs of the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Education and the NTI Foundation, about 68 thousand people undergo training in various areas related to the ALS. 

Main indicators and activities of the national project "Unmanned aircraft systems"

Purpose of the national project:

Ensuring technological independence and the formation of new markets in such areas as unmanned aircraft systems.


Aimed at achieving the national development goal:

Technological leadership


Federal projects

  • Infrastructure, safety and certification
  • Advanced technologies for ALS
  • Personnel for BAS
  • Stimulation of demand for domestic UAS
  • Development, standardization and serial production of UAS and components
    Key activities of the national project
  • A specialized certification system for unmanned aircraft systems was formed
  • Mass production of unmanned aircraft systems is organized
  • Infrastructure necessary for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems
  • Research and development work was carried out to ensure the technological independence and global competitiveness of Russian unmanned aircraft systems in 9 technological areas
  • Provides an influx of highly qualified personnel in the development, production and operation of unmanned aircraft systems
  • A comprehensive system for stimulating the use of domestic unmanned aircraft systems and services provided using unmanned aircraft systems has been formed
    Key indicators of the national project by 2030
  • The share of domestic UAS in the total volume of the Russian UAS market, including aircraft, helicopters, multirotors - 70,3%
  • The size of the Russian UAS market, excluding educational UAS and including aeroplanes, helicopters and multirotors (taking demand for services into account), in 2030 — 46 230 units.
  • The number of subjects of the Russian Federation equipped with the infrastructure of the NPC in accordance with the methodological support of the ANO "Federal Center BAS" - 48 units.
  • Achieved level of technological independence in the ALS industry - 81,1%
  • The number of certified BAS is 26 units.
  • The number of additional professional programs in the field of UAS that have passed the examination and are included in the digital register of UAS personnel (accruing) is 250 units.
  • Share of specialists in the development, production and operation of UAS in the digital register of UAS personnel employed in organizations in the field - 75%
  • The time to access the use of airspace for equipped unmanned aircraft is 2 hours.
  • The number of new Russian solutions to ensure the integration of unmanned aircraft into a single airspace is 5 units.

Project materials · Full published text

Full Year 2025

Source status: Project

Annual plan 2025 — working materials on project directions.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/god-2025-polnyi.html

Open on the site

Year — Start of the Project

1425 —

Knowledge of the Hierarchy about the upcoming externalization, 568

permission for the inflow of energy Shambhala, 133

1500, approval of plans for preparing mankind for the new Age of Aquarius

1575, the first weak signs of the merger trend, 133

1825 —

Grand Council, 536

Start of preparatory work of the Second Ray, 678

1860 —

activity of Second Ray agents, 678

beginning of the process of the Teachers phenomenon, 697

1918, cycle input, 518

1919 —

first contact of D.K. Master with A.A.B., 631

early occult groups, disappearance, 571

1925 —

Grand Council, 389

value, 518

Conclave Teachers, results, 106

1932, student mobilization, 474

1934, cycle culmination, 516

1936 —

failure, causes, 394–395

planetary force, 474

1939, war, 475, 491

1942 —

June Full Moon, test, 361–362

decisive year of conflict, 326

Widespread Goodwill or Postponement, Prophecy, 97

1945, San Francisco Conference, 464, 466

1945–1948, work, 461

1946 —

completion of reorganization task, 538, 638

beginning of the cycle, 553

1946–2005, completion of the Logos problem, 562

1949, completion of the cooperation of the Teacher D.K. with A.A.B., 631

1975 —

The vanguard of Hierarchy precedes outward manifestation, 587

genuine peace, attendant circumstances, 325

The Science of the Soul, 58

Cleaning work, 694

2025 —

The Great Council,

date set for the first phase of externalization, 530

value, 530

progress in education, religion and economics, subject, 363

2044 — Externalization preceding the return of the Hierarchy, 436

2025 is a unique year!

Mathematically, this number is the crown of numbers!
The sum of all the numbers squared is equal to 2025. (1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9)² = 2025.
The sum of the cubes of all digits also equals 2025. 1³+2³+3³+4³+5³+6³+7³+8³+9³ = 2025
This is a rare phenomenon - the year of a full square: 45² = 2025
The previous "square" year - 44² - was 89 years ago. And the next "square" year will come only in 91 - in 2116! The magic of numbers!

If we compare life with a huge mechanism, the slow planets — Pluto, Uranus, Neptune, as well as Saturn and Jupiter — giant gears that trigger global processes. Their movement determines historical events, economic cycles and social changes, as well as major transformations in the life of each of us.

In the year 2025, these “gears” will take a fundamentally new position, changing the world order, political alliances and our attitude to life. It is important to understand: either you adapt to change, or lag behind reality.

What important events can we expect for ourselves and the planet?

7 key dates — points of change for the planet in 2025

31 March: Neptune enters the Aries - time to act, not dream

26 May: Saturn enters the Aries — the era of determination and discipline

26 May: Saturn's connection with Neptune - the destruction of old systems

4 June: Sextile of Venus and Jupiter - a day of luck and love

9 June: Jupiter turns into a sign of Cancer - a return to family values

7 July: Uranus turns into a sign of Gemini - a leap in technology and global change

11–12 August: Venus connects with Jupiter - a day of happiness

Pluto in Aquarius: the whole year and another 20 years

Since humanity today, after all, as a result of its own inventions and abstract intellectual development, is forced to think in terms of its global destiny and universal unity, to feel involved in the evolution of our entire planet and the real responsibility for what we can now do - all this must be developed by the efforts of all conscious human beings. Studying the cycles of the planets of our solar system can be a life-saving aid for the growth of this impersonal historical and global awareness in people - those people who are ready and willing to believe that now humanity will have to play an unusual, new role.

As already noted, there are centuries-old climatic processes, imperial cycles (144 The existence of some form of civilization, 10-12- summer (as well as longer and shorter) economic cycles, and seasonal changes throughout the year. For example, in rice. 4.13 Recurring 12- summer waves, constituting the imperial cycle. Comparing these waves at a certain interval, shows that everything is repeated (sometimes with a reverse sign). But the use of this pattern allows us to predict the future not as a random event, but as a completely natural phenomenon in the general world dynamics. Recorded in our scientific predictive work is still in the middle 90- the years of the last century, the future change of globalization to the regionalization of world politics and the confrontation "north-south" at the level of 2013-2024 History confirms the practice.

What unique events occurred within this "Imperial" historical cycle at the end of which we are now

2025 ended 12-year cycle with 2013-2025 correlated with the cycle of Jupiter

  • Ended 36- a summer cycle (3X12) with 1989 by 2025 correlated with the cycle of Saturn and Neptune.
  • Ended 60- a summer cycle (5X12) with 1965 by 2025 correlated with the basic cycle of the eastern calendar system, this was the last phase 1 000 000- a summer cycle associated with the fifth Aryan race and its fifth sub-race in the current history of mankind.
  • Ended 84- summer cycle (7X12) with 1941 by 2025 Correlation with the cycle of the planet Uranus.
  • Ended 144- summer cycle (12X12) with 1881 by 2025 correlated with the patterns of history pulse.
  • V 2020 The cycle ended in 260 years due to the cycle of conjunctions of Saturn and Jupiter and the planetary parade cycle.
  • V 2012 At the beginning of the last phase 144-summer cycle, ended simultaneously two cycles: 5 200 Years since 3113 the Year of Our Era 2012 year A.D.

and cycle in 26 000 years associated with precession or the Great Space Year.

  • In 2000 ended the epochal cycle of 2160 years, due to precession and associated with the change of eras, the Pisces era ended and the Aquarian age began, which lasted until 4160.
  • Modern change of eras with a cycle in 2160 years and the cycle of a large space year duration 26 000 years associated with the cycle in 260 000 years, cycle of rotation of the Big Wheel of the Zodiac
  • In 1996, a planetary event occurred that marked the boundary of the cycle at 18 000 000 years, a cycle spanning the entire history of known humanity in this fourth circle.
  • V 1975 The year ended with the direct effect of the cycle duration in 21 000 000 years that lasted from 1875 by 1975 a year associated with the planetary and space history of mankind.
  • In December 1983, Pluto will reach Scorpio (heliocentrically) and remain in that sign until September 1995. As it moves through Scorpio, the planet will travel faster than ever—literally faster than Neptune. Pluto will reach its perihelion (the point closest to the Sun) in 1988, at 12°43'» Scorpio. Before entering this zodiacal sign, Pluto will cross Neptune’s orbit and come closer to the Sun than Neptune. This very interesting phenomenon occurs because Pluto’s orbit is considerably elongated; during this period it will resemble Mercury’s orbit on a gigantic scale. We may speak of this as the fertilisation of Neptunian ideals by the unremitting activity of Plutonian factors. As already stated, the period will last nine years, according to the calculations of astronomer Hugh Rice of the New York Planetarium; more recent astronomical calculations, however, indicate that this cosmic phenomenon will last more than twenty-two years, between November 1978 and May 2000. The last such period occurred just before 1750—a time when the ideas and the people destined to dominate the revolutionary upheavals approximately 30 years later were born.

It can be said that Pluto, in at least one sense, symbolizes the seed falling into the soil, created from decomposed and chemically treated remnants of the final cycle of annual vegetation (products of the Neptuneian dissolution process); it may have to do with the "descending into hell" of Christ before his resurrection. And since Pluto (physically) invades Neptune’s orbit, symbolically we can say that there is a process of liberation (from the past) and fertilization containing the nucleus, which can give a vision of the future. Indeed, such a period at each orbit of Pluto around the Sun, in the historical sense, is unusually significant.

20252037 20492061 207320852097 21992211 2223 22352247 2259

In the year 2025 cycles will begin:

  • 12-year cycle of complete social transformation with the manifestation of phase sequence of qualitative changes in 1 year. (1-12)
  • 30-year cycle of complete reconstruction of the state system with phase transformations of the process with a frequency of 2,5 years.
  • 36-year cycle of change of ideology, caused by the cycle of conjunctions of Saturn and Neptune.
  • 7-year cycle, the first phase of 84-year cycle of transformation of the foundations of planetary existence.
  • 14-year cycle, the first phase of 164-year cycle of the global paradigm shift of the planetary civilization.
  • 20-year cycle, the first phase of 248-year cycle of change of the global scientific and religious paradigm on a planetary scale.
  • 60-year cycle of complete transformation of public-state relations, the basic bearing cycle in the Eastern calendar system.
  • 144-s summer cycle, the main carrier wave of history in changing the form of the national way of life.

The following should be added:

V 2020 the Year – 5 Years ago, the cycle began 260 years associated with specific features of planetary relations, the cycle which contains all of the above cycles with their features.

V 2012 the Year – 13 years ago, a new cycle of human space history began, the duration of 26 000 years.

In 2000 - 25 years ago, a new epochal cycle of the Aquarian Age began with a duration of 2160 years, a cycle of complete change of the foundations of planetary civilization.

A unique feature of the previous "Imperial" cycle in 144 Year (c 1881 by 2025 In current history, it is that this cycle had to end very large cosmic cycles of duration 1 000 000 years, 18 000 000 years and 21 000 000 years related to the cosmic destiny and evolutionary task of planetary humanity.

That will inevitably be reflected, and its form of manifestation, in all the forthcoming cyclical unfolding of the "package", the above described cycles that form the contours of the future.

The main astrological correspondences to age factors in human life

7 years. Saturn's growing square to its natal position, the semi-sectilla of Uranus.
12 years. Jupiter's first return to the radix position.
14 years. Saturn's opposition to natal, sextile Uranus.
19 years. A new cycle of nodes.
21. Saturn's falling square to the natal point, Uranus' first square.
24. Jupiter's Second Return.
27 years. Return of the progressive moon to its natal position.
28 years. Uranus trigon natal, inversion of lunar nodes.
29,5 years. Return of Saturn to its natal position.
30 years. The repetition of the natal aspect of the Sun-Moon in progressions, Jupiter's opposition to the natal position.
36 years. Saturn's second growing square, Jupiter's third return to the radix position.
38 years. Second cycle of nodes.
42. Uranus' opposition to natal position, Neptune's growing square to radix, Jupiter's opposition to natal position.
44. Saturn's Second Opposition.
47 years. Inversion of lunar nodes.
48 years. Jupiter's fourth return to the radix point.
51. Saturn's second falling square.
55 years. The Second Return of the Progressive Moon.
56 years. The Falling Trigon of Uranus. The worm cycle of knots.
59-60 years. Saturn's second return, Jupiter's fifth return. Pluto's growing square is natal, the second progressive repetition of the natal aspect of the Sun-Moon.
63. The Falling Square of Uranus.
65 years. Inversion of lunar nodes.
66 years. Saturn's third growing square.
70 years. The Falling Sextile of Uranus.
72. Jupiter's Sixth Return.
75 years. Fifth cycle of nodes, the third opposition of Saturn.
77 years. The Falling Semi-Sequel of Uranus.
80 years. Saturn's third falling square.
82-83. The Third Return of the Progressive Moon to the Radix Point
84. The Return of Uranus, the Seventh Return of Jupiter Inverse position of lunar nodes.

Here is an extended forecast for the Year of the Yellow Resonance Seed (2025–2026), It was created for inspiration on the Day Out of Time. Year of the Yellow Resonance Seed 26 July 2025 – 24 July 2026

  • Kin of the Year: Yellow Resonance Seed (Kin 124)
  • Pulsar of the Galaxy: The Blue Rhythmic Eagle
  • Focus: Vision + Equality) Analog in 13 Lunar Calendar: The Year of the White Crystal Wizard.
  • Symbol of the Year: Space Garden. - Seed (Kahn): The year of the conception of new realities. Every thought, intention, or project “planted” in this cycle carries the code of the future. — Yellow (Southern Color): Energy of awareness, fertility, and maturation. It is not growth through struggle, but flourishing through wisdom and mutual support.
  • (7th tone): Vibration of harmony, channels, co-creation. The answer to the question: "How to attract resources for my seeds?" through resonance with others!
  • Metaphor of the year: “Imagine that you are a gardener of a galactic garden. Your seeds are your intentions. Resonance is the rain and sunlight coming through your connections to the world. Soil is the purity of your heart." 4 Keys to the Year (What to Focus):

1. Intention as Art: - Do not throw "seeds" by accident. Wrap them in beauty: visualize, draw, sing to them. The brighter the image, the stronger the shoots. - Action on the Day out of Time: Write 1 seed-intention on a bud of paper and "plant" it into the ground (pot / garden) after the ritual.

2. 🔶 Creating a Synchronous Community: - The Resonant Tone calls for a network, not an individual heroic feat. Your seeds will sprout through people whose frequencies match yours. - Question for meditation: “Who resonates with my seed? How can I find/strengthen these connections?”

3. Open Channels (Resonance = Health): - Blocks in the body, emotions, communications = dried seeds. Year Requires: - Clean channels: water, breath, sincere conversations. - Tune resonance: sound baths, mantras, silence.

4. - Abundance through bestowal: - Yellow Seed is the energy of Earth's bounty. The more you share resources (knowledge, time, inspiration), the more you come back. - Practice: Give something without conditions every full moon. A warning from Pulsar (Blue Eagle): "Do not plant seeds in the blind! Do you see the way from seed to tree?

Project materials · Full published text

Strategic Cooperation Agreement No. м32

Source status: Project

The strategic cooperation agreement is a model of cooperative partnership.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/dog-o-strat-m32-npk-npo-spetszaschita-2.html

Open on the site

Contract No. 32

the Strategic Partnership

and business relations

Mr. Moscow, Russian Federation "10" December 2025 year

Financial operator of the MC in the PC MIC "Pre-Intrast" represented by the President of the MC Alimova Svetlana Fedorovna (LLC "New Dawn" OGRN 1167746546076, INN 7722366303, KPP 773301001, Legal address125310, Mr. Moscow, ter. g. Mitino municipal district, st. Mitinskaya, d. 55, Page. 1, Floor 1, place./com. III/15)acting on the basis of the Charter, resident of the Russian Federation, (hereinafter - the Party 1),

and

NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITAthe Chairman of the Council Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich , acting on the basis of the Charter, INN 9709066128, KPP 770901001, OGRN 1207700383087, Legal address: 109004, Mr. Moscow, st. Stanislavsky, d. 22, Page. 2, Seating. 11, Parties, hereinafter referred to as "the Party" 2"The Russian Federation residents, collectively referred to as the "Parties", have concluded this agreement on the following.

1. SUBJECT OF THE TREATY.

1.1. The Parties, recognizing the importance and specific nature of the tasks to be undertaken by each of them, agree on a comprehensive strategic partnership and cooperation with a view to ensuring favorable conditions for the activities of the Parties in areas of common interest of the Parties, in particular, the economy. The Parties shall enter into legal relations regulated by the legislation of the Russian Federation and foreign countries.

1.2. The subject of this agreement is the development of strategic measures for the successful financial and economic activities of the Parties, with the aim of implementing socially significant projects independently or jointly implemented by the Parties to improve, stabilize living conditions, security of legal aspects of further activities.

1.3. The Parties shall concentrate their intellectual, material, labor, organizational, and financial resources for cooperation within the framework of this Agreement.

1.4. The Parties also agreed that the strategic partnership will be ensured through joint interaction of the Parties with state regulatory bodies, as well as state, commercial and non-profit organizations whose activities are of interest to the Parties.

1.5. In addition to the goals specified in paragraph 1.1 of this Agreement, the Parties determined that the purpose of their mutually beneficial cooperation is to co-finance and implement software activities of any of the parties concerned on a parity basis, comprehensive assistance in the formation and development of statehood, the formation of a modern and civilized society, the development of culture, the organization of favorable conditions for doing business by third parties in the territory of the Russian Federation (and beyond its borders), which will be provided by the Parties, through coordination.

1.6. At the same time, each of the "Parties" reserves the right to regulate the issues of professional activities of participants in their activities.

2. Forms of cooperation.

2.1. The parties agreed that the strategic partnership under this Treaty is based on the principles of legality, openness and trust, coherence of actions and mutual timely information about them, integrity and reliability, mutual assistance.

2.2. The parties state that they have a business reputation, professional knowledge, necessary business ties, material and other opportunities and are ready to fulfill their obligations to ensure the implementation of the activities of this Agreement.

2.3. Within the framework of the strategic partnership "Parties":2.3.1. Unite their efforts to develop joint proposals to state bodies of legislative and executive power on issues of their joint activities and to promote their proposals to the relevant state structures;

2.3.2. coordinate positions on any issues related to the development of their equal strategic partnership, using and improving the mechanism of regular meetings, primarily at the highest and high levels;

2.3.3. Conduct regular exchange of views and coordinate positions on topical domestic international issues of mutual interest, as well as develop regulations for the activities of other participants involved in the preparation of relevant projects;

2.3.4. Coordinate the cooperation and joint work of representatives authorized to represent the interests of the Parties in state, public and other bodies in order to effectively defend the interests of the Parties;2.3.5. Combine their service, production and other capabilities and opportunities in order to more effectively address the issues of increasing the capacity of each of the Parties;

2.3.6.They exchange information between the parties on the functioning of a strong and effective system of interaction, as well as the activities of organizations that are part of the "Parties"; mutual advice on issues within the competence of the parties, as well as provide relevant information in terms of interaction of organizations in the development of new technologies and mutual assistance in search of reliable partners in various regions of the Russian Federation;

2.3.7. Contribute to the preservation and development of the activities of the "Parties", the consolidation of civilized forms of activity in the financial and other markets; maintain the business reputation of the "Parties", as well as establish contacts with organizations interested in cooperation with the "Parties"; 2.3.8. Agree on a time limit under which representatives of Parties may participate in meetings of governing bodies, meetings, and other events held by the Parties.


3. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES

3.1. The Parties undertake:

3.1.1. Refrain from any action or omission that may lead to the violation of the legitimate interests of the other party to the contract, or take other actions that may cause any harm or damage to the other party to this contract.

3.1.2. Take all measures regarding the confidentiality of information in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 8 of this contract;

3.1.3. To consider, interpret and use the terms and conditions of this contract in direct and exact accordance with its text, not allowing interpretations of the text of the contract, supplementing, excluding, expanding, reducing distortions of the meaning inherent in them.

4. rights of the parties.

4.1. The parties have the right to:

4.1.1. To personally monitor the implementation of this Agreement.

4.1.2. Involve in joint activities financial, production, labor and other resources of third parties.

4.1.3. To finance joint work on the implementation of this Agreement.

4.3.4.From the received dividends received as a result of the strategy developed by both Parties for the implementation of this Agreement, to pay expense items, services of third parties, to make purchases of property necessary for the implementation of administrative and economic activities of the Parties.

5. GOALS AND TASKS.

5.1. This Agreement is intended to ensure the use of innovative technologies of NEU-HAU to achieve a common goal in accordance with the current legislation, which will be provided:

5.1.1. Investment of funds in joint projects, followed by their professional and controlled management;

5.2. Conducting activities that meet the objectives of the Parties and are not contrary to the

the current legislation of the Russian Federation and the states beyond it.

5.3. Parties may carry out activities for which obtaining licenses is necessary (if necessary) from the moment of obtaining such a license and within the period established in it and terminate upon the expiration of its validity, unless otherwise established by law or other legal acts.

5.4. The distribution of dividends received in the process of strategic measures arising from the terms and conditions of this Treaty will be made in accordance with the agreement of the Parties and will be spelled out in the Additional Protocols, Regulations, Agreements, Annexes to this Treaty.

6. Organization and Management

6.1. The parties agreed that the organization and management under this agreement will be as follows:

6.1.1. "Party 1" on the basis of the adopted decisions carries out the organization and documentary support of licensing measures necessary for the implementation of projects.

6.1.1.1. "Party 2" organizes the attraction of funds for the implementation of projects.

6.1.2 The Party 2 organizes and carries out measures for the construction of agro-industrial complexes, taking into account the construction of four mini-hydroelectric power stations, included in the business plan of the project.

7. Liability of the Parties

7.1. For failure to perform or improper performance of their obligations under this agreement, the Parties are liable in accordance with the current legislation of the Russian Federation.

7.2. In case of non-performance or improper performance by one of the Parties of its obligations under this contract and in connection with it, it is obliged to compensate the other Party for the losses caused by such non-performance or improper performance, stipulated in contracts and additional agreements to contracts.

7.3. Compensation for damages is understood as compensation by the guilty Party for the costs of the other Party (direct costs associated with activities) caused by violations by the guilty Party of the terms and conditions of this contract. Loss of profits and other indirect losses are not recoverable.

7.4. Persons participating in projects are responsible for non-compliance with deadlines, incomplete and inadequate quality of work performed. In the event that a Party has reasonable claims against a company, that Party shall take all measures to hold such person accountable and to compel such persons to satisfy the claims at their own expense.

7.5. Persons participating in projects are responsible to the Parties for the quality of the organization and conduct of work, including the quality of their own and rental equipment, its operation, as well as for the organization of work and provision of qualified personnel, safe working conditions in case of

performance of work.

8. PRIVACY

8.1. The parties undertake to observe official, industrial, economic, social, state secrets, both for investment programs and for work with documents, for negotiations carried out within the framework of this general agreement. It is necessary to take all organizational, technical, technological and other security measures to ensure internal, industrial, official secrecy.

8.2. All information received by the Parties during the implementation of the investment program in the development of this agreement may not be transferred to a third party without the written consent of the second party.

8.3. The parties are obliged to respect the interests and confidentiality of the owners. The property includes assets, projects, business plans, documents, details, telephone numbers, as well as any other information related to the Investment Program.

8.4. Information on the ownership of any property acquired by the Party as a result of cooperation under this Agreement will be protected by this Agreement, the Charter, current legislation, internal regulations of the Party, and may not be transferred to a third party without the written consent of the second party.

8.5. The parties agreed to adhere to the principles of confidential business ethics and non-disclosure rules established by international requirements. These principles and rules will be in force for 5 (five) years after receipt of the information.

representing industrial, internal, state secrets, and relate to all transactions concluded in the course of this contract, repeated or renegotiated and concluded transactions in respect of the same subject.

8.6. All information exchanged between the Parties is confidential and neither Party may transmit the information in its possession in relation to this contract and conduct transactions within it with persons not duly authorized.

9. Procedure for entry into force, validity period, procedure for termination and termination of this contract

9.1. This Agreement shall enter into force from the moment of its signing by authorized representatives of the Parties and shall remain in force until the Parties fully fulfill their obligations under this Agreement and in connection with it.

9.2 This Agreement may be terminated and terminated:

- by mutual agreement of the Parties;

- by court decision;

- on other grounds expressly provided for by law.

9.3. In the event that one of the Parties decides to withdraw from the contract, it must notify the other Party in writing. The party who has expressed a desire to terminate this agreement shall transfer to the other Party not less than 6 (six) months before the date of its actual termination.

9.4. Termination of this contract does not automatically mean termination of other contracts and contracts concluded between the Parties under this contract and in connection with it, which must be performed in accordance with the conditions contained in their texts.

9.5. In case of termination or change of the terms of this agreement by mutual consent of the Parties, in case of damage to one of the Parties, each of the Parties shall compensate for the specified damage to the other Party.

9.6. In the event of termination of this Agreement at the initiative or fault of one of the Parties, this Party shall compensate the other Party for all losses caused by early termination.

10. Dispute resolution and applicable law

10.1. All disputes and/or disagreements that may arise between the Parties under this Agreement and in connection with it will, if possible, be resolved through negotiations between the Parties.

10.2. For disputes related to the execution of this contract, the pre-trial procedure is mandatory. The period for consideration of the claim is 30 (thirty) calendar days. The claim is sent to the other party by registered mail or transferred under a receipt.

10.3. In case the Parties do not come to an agreement on disputes and disagreements, the disputes shall be resolved in court in accordance with the current legislation.

10.4. All relations of the Parties under this Agreement and in connection with it, not reflected in the text of this Agreement, shall be regulated in accordance with the norms of civil law.

11. Force majeure and other cases of release of responsibility

11.1. The parties are exempt from liability for partial or complete non-performance or improper performance of their obligations under this contract, if such non-performance or improper performance of obligations was the consequence of

circumstances of force majeure, and in other cases arising after the conclusion of this contract as a result of events of an extraordinary nature, independent of the will of the Parties, which the parties could not foresee, and the consequences of which they could not influence by reasonable measures.

11.2. The following events shall be considered as cases of irresistible force: war and military actions, uprisings, mobilization, strike at enterprises of the Parties to this Treaty and their partners, epidemics, natural and man-made disasters, acts of state and municipal authorities affecting the fulfillment of obligations and all other events, and circumstances that the competent court recognizes and declares as cases of irresistible force.

11.3. A Party affected by force majeure circumstances shall immediately notify the other Party by telegram, fax about the nature and possible duration of these circumstances, give an assessment of their impact on the performance of the Parties' obligations under this agreement, as well as report on the

11.4. During the period of force majeure and other circumstances exempting from liability, the fulfillment of the obligations of the Parties under this Agreement is suspended, the terms of performance of obligations are postponed for the duration of such circumstances or their consequences, sanctions for failure to fulfill obligations within the period provided for by this Agreement are not applied.

11.5. If force majeure lasts more than three months, the Parties shall take a joint decision to fulfill their obligations. If no agreement is reached, the Party not affected by force majeure shall have the right without recourse to the court to terminate this Agreement after written notification to the other Party.

12. Notifications and messages

12.1. All notifications and communications sent in accordance with and in connection with this Agreement, with the exception of notifications, the procedure for the transfer of which is prescribed separately, will be considered as submitted properly if they are sent to the addressee by registered mail, by telex, fax, telefax or computer communication or delivered personally to the specified addresses of the Parties.

13. Legal addressrequisites and signatures of parties

Party1

FO UC in PC MIC "PRE-INTRAST"

"The New Dawn"

Address: g 125310, Mr. Moscow, ter. g. Mitino municipal district, st. Mitinskaya, d. 55, Page. 1, Floor 1, place./com. III/15

OGRN 1167746546076

INN/CAT7722366303 / 773301001

Tel.: +7 999 848 64 10

E-mail:sve-1945@yandex.ru

_____________/Alimova S.F./

Address Parties2

PC "MIC PRE-INTRAST"

Russia, g. Moscow, st. People's House 8.

OGRN 1183443000113, TIN3459055334

Tel:+7-904-419-9142

E-mail: aabdyusheva@yandex.ru

Party 2

NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"Address:_ 109004, Mr. Moscow, st. Stanislavsky, d. 22, Page. 2, Seating. 11

OGRN 1207700383087

INN/CAT9709066128/ 770901001

Tel.: +7921 307 67 01E-mail:severa.70@mail.ru

_____________/Sokolov S,A.

Project materials · Full published text

Caucasus Trail

Source status: archive

The Caucasus Trail project — reference materials about the tourist route.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/kavkazkaya-tropa.html

Open on the site

Caucasus.Russia presented the project of the Caucasus Trail

Caucasus.RF presented the project of a single tourist route "Caucasian trail" at the meeting of the working group on tourism development of the Coordinating Council under the Plenipotentiary Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the North Caucasus Federal District. The meeting was chaired by the Deputy Plenipotentiary of the President of the Russian Federation in the North Caucasus Federal District Vladimir Nadykto. 

General Director of Caucasus.RF Andrey Yumshanov, Executive Director of Caucasus.RF Hasan Timizhev, representatives of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, the governments of the regions of the North Caucasus and relevant departments took part in the discussion of the agenda issues.

The main issue of the agenda was the creation of an interregional tourist route "Caucasian Trail" as a promising project for the North Caucasus, which will allow combining the natural, cultural and historical objects of the district into one route from the Black to the Caspian Sea.

“The total length of the trail is 3300 km. It will pass through the territory of all the republics of the North Caucasus and the Krasnodar Territory, including 13 specially protected natural areas. Now we are working on a master plan for the development of the territories of the subjects of the North Caucasus Federal District within the boundaries of the route, it will be ready in March next year. We already have an understanding of the corporate style of the Caucasian Trail, suggestions for marking and navigation,” said Executive Director of Caucasus.RF Hasan Timizhev.

The meeting also discussed security issues in the territories of the resorts of the North Caucasus and the macro-region’s readiness for the winter tourist season. 

"Caucasian trail" - one of the tourist projects Caucasus.RF. The route will run from the Black to the Caspian Sea and will connect Sochi and Derbent. It will unite lovers of trekking, mountaineering, mountain biking, archeology, cultural and ecological tourism.

The total amount of investment in the creation of the “Caucasian trail” can be 6 billion roubles

Mineralnye Vody. 27 May. INTERFAX - "Kavkaz.RF" plans to send 3 billion the creation of the tourist route "Caucasian trail", while the order 3 billion RUB can also invest and private investors, said Deputy General Director of JSC "Kavkaz.RF" Vladimir Lapukhin.

“We have a two-stage implementation period. Once we adopt the necessary legislation, it will allow us to attract public and private funds. The total amount of money in the project, approximately, 3 billion Rubles, but we are still planning 3 billion We will build a huge number of glampings, campsites and other places of accommodation throughout the route, it is planned to equip other infrastructure facilities," Lapukhin said during the session "Tourism in the North Caucasus Federal District: from sea to sea" at the Caucasus Investment Forum on Tuesday.

All interchanges and branches of the trail, according to the deputy director, are planned to be designed so that tourists can get acquainted with agrotourism. The trail is expected to attract at least 3 Millions of tourists a year, this will require the creation of at least 8 Thousands of collective accommodation facilities.

“We have already, in principle, started [the implementation of the project]. On the territory of the Chechen Republic, 60 km of trails were implemented, on the territory of Elbrus a little less - 38 km. We see that they are actively in demand,” said Lapukhin.

He added that with the support of the Ministry of Economic Development, a law is currently being worked out that will define the concept of an “ecotrope”, approaches to its organization and regulation.

“The main specificity of the trail is that it cannot just be interrupted somewhere and go back. It should be a complete route, which means that it must pass through different lands in one way or another. In general, there are all agreements, I think that the first reading (of the law) this year will be held,” said Deputy Minister of Economic Development Dmitry Vakhrukov.

The route "Caucasian trail" will affect all the republics of the North Caucasus and Krasnodar region, including 13 specially protected natural areas. The 3,3 thousand km trail will pass from the Caspian Sea through the entire North Caucasus and will go to the Black Sea coast.

Read more: https://www.interfax-russia.ru/tourism/news/obshchiy-obem-investiciy-v-sozdanie-kavkazskoy-tropy-mozhet-sostavit-6-mlrd-rubley

Project materials · Full published text

Concept for Dagestan’s Development

Source status: Project

Dagestan development concept — project materials for the territorial area.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/kontseptsiya-razv-dagestana.html

Open on the site

09:27 11.10.2018

Economy

Conceptual foundations of the new strategy of social and economic development of Dagestan

Abbas Akhmeduev D.E., Professor

Issue - 2018 No269-270

Version for the visually impaired

695

Large-scale work has been launched in the republic to develop a strategy for the socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan until 2035. With the involvement of experts and the general public, strategic sessions are held to discuss problems and determine priorities for the long-term socio-economic development of the republic.

We must first discuss and adopt the concept of a new strategy

Strategic sessions are very useful work and are essentially a sociological survey aimed at identifying and forming public opinion on certain topical issues of economic and social development. The results of such strategic sessions can, of course, be taken into account in the formulation of the strategy in some form.

But strategic planning, the development of strategic documents in accordance with the Federal law of 28.06.2014 City No 172-FZ "On strategic planning in the Russian Federation" requires a deep systematic analysis of the state of the economy, forecasting and fundamental justification of strategic decisions. The Strategy of the Republic of Dagestan is a legislatively approved strategic planning document that defines the priorities, goals and objectives of economic and social development for the long term. The quantitative and qualitative indicators provided for in the strategy, their guaranteed achievement in the planned time will determine the state and pace of development of the economy, the level and quality of life of the entire population of the republic and each Dagestani.

The strategy of Dagestan as a formalized directive of long-term goals and the dominant organization of life activity is of crucial importance for the entire Dagestani society and every citizen. It follows that the strategy is not only a key lever of state and municipal governance. At all stages in the development and implementation of strategic documents for the development of the republic, municipalities, territories, sectors of the economy and the social sphere, citizens should take an active part. Therefore, it would be advisable to first develop and widely discuss in society, at strategic sessions, in the expert community, etc., the concept of a strategy in which to reveal real modern key problems, to determine the main long-term strategic goals and priorities for the socio-economic development of the republic. On the basis of such a concept, agreed upon and approved by the majority of the population, it is advisable to develop strategic planning documents for the long term.

It is necessary to justify the objective need for a new strategy

The concept should first of all justify the need for a new Strategy, provided the existence and functioning of the legally approved Strategy for Social and Economic Development of the Republic of Dagestan until 2025 (Strategy RD - 2025). There must be good reasons for repealing the law approving the current RD-2025 Strategy. It is advisable to discuss and publish them, especially since the current Strategy of RD - 2025 as an instrument of public administration has not yet exhausted itself, not all the tasks envisaged in it have been solved, and the goals are still far from being achieved.

However, the development and subsequent adjustment of the RD 2025 strategy should be taken into account and used in the formulation of the new strategy. It would be advisable to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the implementation of the main strategic indicators for the first stage (2015) and, possibly, for individual indicators (for example, for GRP) - for the second stage (2020).

The most superficial analysis of the progress of the RD strategy - 2025 shows that many strategic indicators planned for the stage up to 2015,
Not implemented. For example, the industry has not achieved the most important indicators both in terms of growth and production volumes. The manufacturing industry has been particularly unsuccessful, with output growth of less than 45% to the strategic plan under the optimistic scenario. Also, the strategic guidelines for reducing the subsidy budget, the income of the consolidated budget per capita, the growth of real wages, the level of general unemployment and some other key indicators of the development of the social sphere have not been achieved.

A deeper analysis will avoid the shortcomings that existed in the development of the RD Strategy - 2025, objectively assess the planned indicators adopted then, reveal real potential, justify strategic goals and priorities for a new long-term perspective.

What is the time horizon of a new strategy?

One of the conceptual issues that require reflection and justification is the definition of the time horizon of the new strategy of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan. The need for and possibility of adopting a strategy for the period up to 2035 should be thoroughly discussed and justified. The fact is that a strategy for the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation until 2030 is being developed. Accordingly, strategies for the development of macroregions (federal districts) of Russia until 2030 will be drawn up and adopted. According to the Federal Law "On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation", the strategies of socio-economic development of macro-regions, constituent entities of the Russian Federation and municipalities should be interconnected and consistent with the priorities and goals of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation. Accordingly, the strategy of socio-economic development of the NCFD will be developed before 2030 in conjunction with the strategy of the Russian Federation.

It will be difficult, if not impossible, to link the strategy of the RD up to 2035, respectively, the strategic goals and priorities of the republic's development with the strategy of the North-Eastern Federal District up to 2030. This, in turn, can cause difficulties for the republic’s participation in federal programs, in the implementation of national projects (programs) developed in accordance with the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 7 May 2018 of 204 (May Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 2018), etc.

For Dagestan, active participation in these and other programs and projects of the Russian Federation and the North Caucasus Federal District is extremely important in order to obtain and use resources from these sources for socio-economic development and solving strategic problems. That is why it is advisable to thoroughly discuss and conceptually solve the issue of the time horizon of the new strategy of socio-economic development of the RD.

It should also be borne in mind that the regions of Russia, for example, St. Petersburg, the Republic of Tatarstan, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Sverdlovsk, Samara, Irkutsk, Tomsk, Arkhangelsk regions, etc., have strategies until 2030. Obviously, such a time horizon is optimal for strategic planning, given the intensive processes of globalization, changes in technological patterns, geopolitical and economic instability in the world. At the same time, it is advisable to predict the socio-economic development of RD not only up to 2030, but also for a longer period, for example, up to 2040, and for individual indicators, possibly up to 2050.

Strategic planning of socio-economic development of municipalities is necessary

The issue of strategic planning of socio-economic development at the level of municipalities is of fundamental importance. The Federal Law "On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation" provides that strategic planning in the Russian Federation is carried out at the federal level, the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and the level of municipalities (Article 1). Contrary to the initial provisions of the Federal Law, strategic planning at the municipal level is not carried out in the Republic of Dagestan and strategic documents for the long-term socio-economic development of municipalities are not developed as stipulated by the Federal Law. The lack of a coherent integrated system of strategic planning of socio-economic development of the republic and municipalities is one of the main factors of disunity of goals and objectives of the management structures of the republican and municipal levels, hence the inefficiency of the entire system of organization and management of economic and social development of the republic.

The economic and financial condition of the municipalities of the republic urgently requires a cardinal strengthening of their role and responsibility for long-term sustainable socio-economic development, modernization and improvement of the efficiency of the entire system of municipal administration. The basis of such modernization, strengthening manageability and ensuring breakthrough socio-economic development at the municipal level can be the system of strategic planning. A long-term strategy for each municipality should become an important tool for restructuring the management system, sustainable socio-economic development, overcoming subsidies, etc. In general, such a system of strategic planning and a corresponding mechanism for implementing strategies at each level should ensure sustainable socio-economic development of municipalities and the republic as a whole.

It is advisable and extremely important to introduce all the provisions and legal norms on strategic planning at the level of municipalities into the Law of the Republic of Dagestan.

At the same time, in order to ensure uniformity, harmonization and interconnection of strategies of the republic and municipalities, it is necessary to discuss and determine the general concept, standard structure of strategic documents, basic indicators and possible scenarios for the long-term socio-economic development of municipalities. For a clear organization of this work and competent development of strategic documents of municipalities, it is advisable - according to the experience of the Republic of Tatarstan - to develop and approve methodological recommendations for strategic planning of socio-economic development at the level of municipal districts (urban districts) of the Republic of Dagestan.

The main strategic goal of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan

One of the key conceptual issues that require broad discussion is the definition of the main strategic goal of the socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan for the long-term perspective. All directions and priorities of development, respectively, the structure and content of strategic documents, should be subordinated to the justification, specification, resource support and the formation of a mechanism for the implementation of the main strategic goal.

The Republic has all the natural, labor and production resources for breakthrough development and overcoming the lag. It is necessary to radically modernize the organization of the economic complex and the system of state and municipal administration

When determining the main strategic goal of the Republic of Dagestan, it is necessary to take into account that in the conditions of globalization and open world market, Russian, including Dagestani republican, markets become segments of the global world market. The economy of Dagestan, as well as Russia as a whole, needs to ensure competitiveness in this global market. At the same time, the republic will have to take an active part in the implementation of the May decree of the President of the Russian Federation 2018. "On national goals and strategic objectives of the development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2024", where among others set a very ambitious task to become one of the five largest economies in the world and to accelerate the technological development of the Russian Federation. In order to fulfill such a difficult task, Russia and its regions, including Dagestan, need to overcome the lag and make a breakthrough in economic, social and technological development.

Vladimir Putin in his Address to the Federal Assembly (1 March 2018) stressed: “It is the backlog that is the main threat and our enemy. And if we do not change the situation, it will inevitably intensify.” The lagging behind of the developed countries in terms of socio-economic and technological development poses a real threat not only to Russia’s economic, but also to its military-strategic security. According to the latest international comparisons, according to the key indicator of GDP per capita at purchasing power parity in US dollars, Russia lags behind Luxembourg 3,9 times, Norway 2,6 times, Sweden 2,4 times, the United States 2,1 times.

Of particular concern should be Russia’s technical and technological backwardness, which, in the context of globalization and an open world market, inevitably entails uncompetitiveness and the gradual extinction of certain industries and sectors of the economy. According to foreign experts, for example, in the US economy, the share of the fourth technological order is 20%, Fifth – 60% and the sixth – 5%, In Russia, it is still 30% – Economics of the Third Technological Order, 50% Fourth and all 10% The fifth, and to the sixth technological order of the Russian economy has not yet reached. Judging by these data, the Russian economy needs to overcome the technical gap with the United States in about one technological way.

With such a lag of Russia from the developed countries of the world, Dagestan as a result of 2016 The country lags behind the average Russian level in almost all macroeconomic indicators. Dagestan lags behind in per capita indicators: GRP 2,4 The amount of industrial output in 20 The cost of fixed assets in 2,5 the amount of investment in fixed assets - in 1,4 Productivity and productivity in 1,7 once. At the same time, the share of innovative goods, works and services in the total volume shipped in Russia was 8,5%, the Republic of Dagestan – 0,4% (Less in 21,3 the share of organizations that implement technological innovations, – 8,4% and 2,5% (Less in 3,4 a) respectively.

This state of the economy inevitably led to an insufficient revenue base and a budget-system deficit, together with lagging social development and living standards in the republic. Subsidies account for 76% of the consolidated budget. The average monthly nominal wage is lower than the Russian average by a factor of 1.8; unemployment is almost twice as high; and consolidated budget expenditure per capita is lower by a factor of 2 than the average across Russian regions. Non-monetary indicators of living standards add to this picture: in Dagestan, total housing floor area per resident is lower than the Russian average by a factor of 1.3, and the number of privately owned cars per 1000 residents is lower by a factor of 1.7. This is a broad, far from complete picture of Dagestan’s economic and social lag.

The development and placement of industry in rural areas is an important factor in ensuring employment of the rural population, reducing migration, securing the population in areas and rural settlements.

Such a large-scale, stable, continuing for almost three decades, lag of socio-economic development poses a threat to socio-political stability and security not only for Dagestan, but also for the entire Russian Federation. The gap in the level of development, the existing social stratification and inequality of citizens are assessed by the population as a social injustice, and in some circles are considered as the main social factor of socio-political instability, the spread of radicalism, extremism and terrorism.

An even more dangerous consequence of the lag is that tens of thousands of the most active and capable Dagestanis leave the republic every year in search of work and normal modern living conditions. The main motives for the migration of Dagestanis are associated with dissatisfaction with the quality of life in the region, the search for work, and reasons of a personal and family nature. Moreover, from 77% to 80% leaving Dagestan are citizens of working age.

For the last 10 According to official data, the negative balance of migration from Dagestan was 146 Thousands of people, around 117 thousands of working age. If these Dagestanis remained and worked in the republic on average productivity of employed people (609 Rs., could have been 2016 Creating from Above 71 billion rub. GRP and to make in the consolidated budget about 4 billion RUB tax and non-tax payments.

This is a far from incomplete annual economic damage of migration of the population from Dagestan to other regions of Russia and foreign countries. Of course, the current steady migration trend is much more dangerous as a process of resorption of Dagestanis, loss of their identity, and in a certain long-term perspective as a threat of the collapse of Dagestan. Therefore, lagging behind is the main threat and enemy not only of all Russia, but also of Dagestan, of all Dagestani society.

Overcoming these threats, breakthrough development, overcoming the lag and leveling the level of socio-economic development should be considered as the most important strategic task of the authorities and the entire Dagestani society. That is why the head of Dagestan V. Vasilyev in one of his speeches quite rightly stressed that Dagestan needs to reach the average indicators of Russia in socio-economic development.

It follows from all this that the main long-term strategic goal of the republic should be to overcome the lag and reach the average macroeconomic indicators of Russia in terms of economic and social development.

The main task of the strategy being developed is precisely to give a clear and precise answer to the question: how, in what time frame and by what means to solve this main strategic task, what resources are needed for this and where to get them.

First, it is necessary for all Dagestanis, especially the young generation, to master one truth - to bring the republic out of the socio-economic crisis and to ensure a decent standard of living only by their own labor, their own efforts and means. Of course, with the help of the Federal Center, which can only be obtained thanks to skillful organization and effective work, active participation in the implementation of federal state programs, plans and other projects.

Secondly, we must understand that the chronic lag of the last three decades is not the result of the incapacity of Dagestanis and is not associated with a lack of resources. The Republic has all the natural, labor and production resources for breakthrough development and overcoming the lag. It is necessary to radically modernize the organization of the economic complex and the system of state and municipal management.

The formation of modern competitive human capital is a top strategic priority

One of the central tasks of the new strategy, strategic planning in general, is the justification of priority areas, industries and spheres of socio-economic development. The choice and justification of strategic priorities should be carried out not by a rally vote, but on the basis of clearly oriented criteria through a deep systematic analysis of the impact of each priority direction on the achievement of the main strategic goal - overcoming the lag, reaching the average indicators of Russia in economic development and living standards of the population.

One of the main factors in the development of the modern knowledge economy is human capital. Modern developed human capital is a supporting structure and the most important system-forming factor of progress in all areas of life, breakthrough socio-economic development in particular. The state and development of human capital, hence the reproductive human potential of the republic, depend on the level and quality of life of the population. In the May decree of the President of the Russian Federation 2018, the national goals of breakthrough development are aimed at improving the standard of living of citizens, creating comfortable conditions for their living, as well as conditions and opportunities for self-realization and disclosure of each person’s talent. Therefore, the priority of the republic’s long-term strategy is to improve the level and quality of life of the population, the formation of modern competitive human capital.

Overcoming the lag of the entire social sphere, improving the level and quality of life of the population for Dagestan is an acute economic, social and socio-political task. The data on the republic’s lagging behind were given above for some indicators: the average salary, budget expenditures per capita, the number of own cars. The republic lags behind the average Russian indicators is taking place throughout the infrastructure of the social sphere, the state and level of development of which depend on the formation and efficiency of the use of human capital.

Okay, 28,4% the General Educational Institutions of Dagestan 2-3 Changes (in Russia – 12,8%, in the NCFD average – 24,3%), on 1000 Students of general education organizations in the republic are 104 personal computer, and in the country – 135 (in 1,3 more than once). Pre-school education in the country is 30,7% (in Russia – 66,5%, SKFO – 45,1%). According to this indicator, Dagestan among the regions of Russia takes the penultimate 84- I'm in. With the urgent need for specialists with higher and secondary special education, the number of students of secondary special educational institutions at 10000 Population in the Republic is less 1,3 than the average in Russia, and students of higher educational institutions 1,4 times less.

A significant lag is observed in healthcare, which plays a key role in improving the level and quality of life of the population, in the formation and maintenance of the capacity of the human capital of the republic. On 10000 We have fewer hospital beds than in Russia as a whole 22,6%, Doctors - on 23,4%, Medical Professionals - on 21,7%. Accordingly, based on the 10000 Dagestan among the regions of Russia occupies the number of hospital beds 79- the place, by number of doctors – 73- e.g., mid-level medical personnel – 80- e.
The incidence rate is 1000 people higher than the average Russian indicator by 2,3%, and the infant mortality rate is 1,7 times higher.

In improving the level and quality of life of the population, the formation and development of human capital, a purposeful and active work in the ideological, educational and cultural spheres should play an essential role. Now the activities of these areas do not meet modern requirements. For example, Dagestan among the regions of Russia for 1000 people in terms of the number of theater spectators occupies 74 place, the number of visits to museums - 81, the library fund - 82 and, paradoxically, the issue of newspapers - 81.

Special attention and urgent measures require the problem of training modern competitive personnel for industries and sectors of the economy of Dagestan. Without this, it is not only difficult to increase the investment attractiveness of the republic, to create new high-tech industries, but it is also impossible to develop existing enterprises.

For the formation of modern human capital, it seems necessary first of all to modernize the entire system of general and professional education. The May Decree of the President of the year 2018 provides for the introduction of new methods of teaching and education at the levels of basic general and secondary general education, educational technologies that ensure the development of basic skills and vocational guidance of all students. This means that the dominant in the system of general and secondary education should be the education of the younger generation of hard work, professional orientation and skills in the use of knowledge in socially useful activities.

The existing traditional system of addressless training in secondary and higher educational institutions needs to be modernized taking into account the modern requirements and needs of the economic complex of the republic. To ensure the personnel solution of strategic tasks of socio-economic development, it is necessary to determine the need for personnel (working and engineering specialists) in the main professions and qualification characteristics for all sectors of the economy and the social sphere at the moment and for the projected strategic perspective. Accordingly, on the basis of these needs, on a contractual (contractual) basis, to organize training for the national economy of the republic in higher and secondary specialized educational institutions, institutes and training courses, etc.

It clearly follows from the above that the modernization and development of the entire infrastructure of the social sphere, overcoming the lag in the level and quality of life of the population, the formation of modern competitive human capital are the absolute priority of the long-term strategy of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan.

The key strategic priority is the transformation of Dagestan into a highly developed industrial and agrarian republic.

The fundamental task of the new strategy is to predict structural changes, determine the optimal sectoral and territorial structure of the republic's economy. All structural changes in the economy should first of all be focused on ensuring the achievement of the main strategic goal. Central and difficult in determining the long-term sectoral structure is the question of choosing between the industrial-agrarian and agrarian-industrial model of specialization of the economy of Dagestan. Methodological approaches to justifying and choosing strategic priorities for long-term socio-economic development depend on this.

Analysis and evaluation of the dynamic processes of globalization, modern sustainable trends of scientific and technological progress suggest that the sustainable development of the economy and the social sphere, overcoming the lag and the republic’s reaching the average Russian macroeconomic indicators are possible only with the breakthrough development of modern industry at the scientific, technical and technological level of the fifth and sixth technological modes. It should be borne in mind that post-industrial civilization grows out of industrial society, and industry is not only the material basis of economic and social development, but also the most important driving force of scientific and technological progress. Therefore, the long-term strategic model should be conceptually oriented towards the transformation of Dagestan into a highly developed industrial and agrarian republic.

The experience of recent decades shows that the restoration and especially the breakthrough development of the modern high-tech industry require cardinal and non-standard strategic decisions. After all, we have the historical experience of the Soviet five-year plans.

The need to restore the former industrial power and breakthrough development of the industrial complex of Dagestan is due to many objective factors. First, ensuring employment of the population of the republic, especially the growing urban population, is impossible in principle without large-scale industrial production. Population with 1991 the City of London 2016 G has increased in 63,9%, the City Hall 66,3%. At last 2016 The urban population has reached 1372 Thousands of people. According to Rosstat, 62,7% (or 860 Thousands of people) belong to the economically active population of the labor force. In all industrial activities, including those located in rural areas 89,6 thousands of people, or 10,4%, economically active urban population. It is clear that to provide employment for the rest of the able-bodied urban population (more 770 Other industries and areas of activity can neither now nor in the longer term. Only the development of industry, the creation of new high-paying jobs for the production of high-tech and high-tech products will solve this acute problem for Dagestan.

Secondly, the development and placement of industry in rural areas is one of the important factors in ensuring employment of the rural population, reducing migration, securing the population in areas and rural settlements. A balanced spatial distribution of productive forces, overcoming inequality and levelling the level of economic and social development of rural and urban areas can be ensured through the active development of industrial activities, the creation of modern high-paying jobs and comfortable living conditions for rural residents.

To do this, you can use the pre-perestroika experience of creating district industrial plants and district food processing plants, canneries and other modern high-tech enterprises for processing agricultural raw materials, placing in the areas of highly specialized production workshops of large enterprises, the development of enterprises of folk arts and other modern competitive industries.

Thirdly, the need to develop industry is dictated by the prospect of developing mineral deposits, expanding the scale of the mining and processing industry. Sustainable development of the fuel and energy complex is extremely important by increasing oil and gas production and processing, creating new capacities for electricity production, etc.

Fourth, it should be borne in mind that industry plays a leading role in the development of agriculture in the republic. It is the industry that creates, develops and supports the material and technical base of the agricultural sector, provides fuel and energy support for the entire process of agricultural production. Sustainable development of the food and agricultural raw material processing industries is crucial for the development of agriculture.

Fifthly, the crucial importance of industry for building up the tax base and creating its own revenue potential of budgets at all levels should be emphasized. Reducing and gradually overcoming the subsidy for Dagestan is the most acute economic, social, socio-political and moral problem. It can be solved only through a breakthrough and large-scale development of industry. Currently, 65% tax and non-tax revenues are provided by the basic industries of the republic. It is obvious that only a modern highly developed and efficient industry can become a real and reliable source of budget revenues at all levels and the financial self-sufficiency of the republic.

The arguments in favor of the industrial-agricultural model of the strategic development of Dagestan can still be continued. But even this makes it possible to assert that Dagestan is doomed to develop a modern high-tech industry. Given the dominant strategic role of industry in the economy and in general in the life of Dagestani society, the current state of the industrial complex should cause serious concern. Started in 1990The years and the deep crisis that continues to this day have led to the degradation of industry, and in fact to the de-industrialization of the republic. In just eight years (1991–1998 b) Industrial production decreased by 83,3%, the City Hall 15 Industries and sub-sectors from 20The fall was more 90%. Total industrial output in 2016 Mr. has totaled 81,4% C 1990 St Petersburg.

This means that the industry is already 26 The years are in place. During this time (in 2016 c. compared to 1990 Natural gas and oil production has declined 3,8 The production of canned food has decreased 10,8 The wine of the vine is in 3,2 fishing, fishing and processing of fish in 7 One. Electricity production per capita in the Republic 2016 Mr. has decreased 16% Compared to 1990 Mr. Per capita, less electricity is produced and consumed 5-5,3 In general, in Russia and 1,8 More than in the SCFA. This is the current state of the industrial complex of the republic.

At the same time, the statistics published about the allegedly high growth rates do not at all indicate the prosperity of industry and disorient the authorities and the public. At one of the meetings of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic, the Chairman of the Government of the RD Artem Zdunov quite rightly questioned the statistical indicators of socio-economic development and demanded to provide him with objective data on the state of the economy of the republic. Such an order is justified, and the clarification of statistical indicators is especially important for an objective assessment of the current state of the industrial complex.

The experience of recent decades shows that the restoration and especially the breakthrough development of the modern high-tech industry require cardinal and non-standard strategic decisions. There is a historical experience of the Soviet five-year plans, when, due to the effective use of its own potential and its resources, thanks to an active state regional policy and direct state participation, a breakthrough was made in socio-economic and cultural development, and Dagestan turned from a backward suburb of the Russian Empire into a highly developed industrial and agrarian republic.

During the years of the Soviet five-year plans were created equipped with the latest technology enterprises of engineering, oil, gas, chemical, glass, woodworking, textile, sewing, leather and footwear, canning, fishing, winemaking and meat and dairy industry. To the post-war 1950 There are more in Dagestan 100 large factories and factories, 70 Fishing Artels, 24 ray industry and ray food industry. The industry also developed at an increasing pace in the post-war period. Only for five years (1971–1985 b) have been built and put into operation 22 large industrial enterprises and 56 Production workshops. For the last 27 years (1991-2017 Only two notable industrial enterprises were built in the republic.

This historical experience shows that Dagestan has the necessary natural and labor resources for the breakthrough development of the republic’s industry. From this experience, the second conclusion follows that the breakthrough development of industry, as well as the entire economy of the republic, is possible only with real state assistance, with an active state regional policy aimed at overcoming inequality and advancing the development of backward regions.

Two strategic priorities for real solutions to the problems of breakthrough industrial development in Dagestan should be highlighted:

1) Recovery and restoration on a modern innovative basis destroyed in 90years of enterprises and sub-sectors, modernization of existing enterprises, full use of production capacities and potential of all branches of industry of the republic;

2) construction of new enterprises by attracting investment and implementing modern innovative investment projects.

First of all, it is necessary to conduct a substantive analysis, assess the state and revive all industrial enterprises that were operating before 1990. It is advisable to restore small and medium-sized industrial enterprises in rural areas that do not require large investments (raipromkombinats, rayeshchembints, branches and workshops of industrial enterprises), modernize and bring them to the modern level of technology and technology.

Secondly, it is necessary to assess the potential and prospects for the development of all existing industrial enterprises, in particular, the use of production facilities, competitiveness of products (services), staffing, financial situation and group them into:

- Sustainable and potentially promising;

potentially promising, but requiring modernization and technical reconstruction;

- hopeless, subject to complete reorganization or liquidation.

With this integrated assessment, it is necessary to define the concept, perspective and practical measures for the development and effective use of the potential of each enterprise.

Thirdly, it is advisable to carry out forecasting, justification and objective assessment of the volume of possible investments in the fixed capital of the republic’s industry from all federal sources. We must proceed from the fact that for such depressed regions of Russia as Dagestan, the federal policy of regional development and, above all, the federal investment policy should provide for active participation of the state in financing investments in priority projects on the terms of public-private partnership.

The strategy should include:

- public-private partnership in financing capital investments in the development of industry in the following forms;

- restoration and technical re-equipment of state unitary enterprises and municipal unitary enterprises by co-financing at the expense of public and private investments, followed by their transformation into open joint-stock companies and the corresponding distribution of shares among investors;

- technical re-equipment and reconstruction of private enterprises at the expense of public investments on the terms of equity participation (acquisition of a stake) of the state in the authorized capital;

reconstruction and technical re-equipment of open joint-stock companies with the participation of the state (share in capital, shareholding) by co-financing at the expense of the state and a private investor (investors) with the corresponding redistribution of the shareholding of the joint-stock company between investors;

construction of new enterprises (implementation of investment projects) through equity financing at the expense of the state and private investor (investors) with the corresponding consolidation of the share of investors in the authorized capital;

- construction of new enterprises at the expense of state investments in fixed assets, followed by their transformation into open joint-stock companies and the free distribution of shares among the population and legal entities.

The new strategy of socio-economic development should provide for the phased implementation of active and effective measures in the proposed areas, which will ensure the breakthrough development of industry, restore the former power of the industrial complex and solve this key strategic task for Dagestan.

Agriculture - a basic industry and a strategic priority of socio-economic development

The industrial-agricultural strategic model of the economy does not mean the priority development of industry to the detriment of other industries and sectors of the economy. On the contrary, such a model implies a harmonious and balanced development of the entire economic complex, and industry at the same time ensures the revival and integration of the potential of all industries, plays an active role of the “locomotive” of sustainable growth of the entire economy and improving the standard of living of the population.

Industry should play a special role in the breakthrough development of agriculture, strengthening its material and technical base, introducing modern innovative agricultural technologies, effective methods of storage, processing and transportation of agricultural products.

Agriculture is the second basic structural branch of the economy of the republic, the state and prospects of development of which, along with industry, determine the level and quality of life of the population, overcoming the lag and solving the main strategic goal of the Republic of Dagestan for the long term. In agriculture, the republic is created 15,5% Gross regional product, employed 255,2 Thousands of people (23,9% Total number of employees, operating 6,3% fixed assets.

In recent decades, the production of certain types of agricultural products in the republic has been growing at a high rate. So, in 2016 c. compared to 1990 The production of vegetables increased in 6,2 Once, potatoes in 5 Once, the milk in 2,4 Once, the meat in 1,8 Fruits and vegetables, in 1,2 once. population during this time (1991-2016 Growing up 63,9%, and the production of the main types of agricultural products lagged behind the rate of population growth. As a result, the production of agricultural products (except vegetables and potatoes) per capita has decreased sharply and in 2016 c. compared to 1990 G. made up by: grain – 45,8%, Grapes – 49, Eggs – 61,5, Wool – 62,5%, Milk – 70,8%, Fruits – 75,4%. At the same time, Dagestan lags behind the average indicators of Russia in per capita grain production 6,6 Once, eggs in 3,7 Once, potatoes in 1,6 Once, the meat in 1,5 of these products, respectively, in the 11 time, 1,8 times, 1,2 times, 1,5 times.

In accordance with the decree of the President of the Russian Federation 30 January 2010 № 120 To ensure food security, it is necessary to guarantee the physical and economic availability of food products for each citizen in amounts not less than rational consumption standards. This requirement of the Food Security Doctrine for Dagestan as a predominantly agrarian region is of absolute importance. Meanwhile, the needs of the population of the republic at the expense of their own production are not satisfied for any type of food, except vegetables and potatoes. As of 2016 The country meets its needs according to the established rational consumption standards for milk and dairy products 85,9%, bread and bread products - on 72,1%, Meat and meat products - on 60,7%, Fruits - on 43,4%, the Egg - on 30,6%, Fish and fish products - on 8,9%. In order to meet the needs of the population according to rational consumption standards, the republic annually needs to be imported 81,1 thousand tons of bread and bread products, 87 thousand tons of meat and meat products, 138,9 thousand tons of milk and dairy products, 171,5 thousand tons of fruits and berries, 66,2 Thousands of tons of fish and fish products, 546,5 Millions of eggs.

The state of organization and level of development of agriculture, its role in the economy of the republic characterizes the fact that in general the contribution of the agrarian sphere to tax and non-tax revenues of the consolidated budget is only one percent. This state of agriculture and food industry is a real threat not only to food security, but also to the overall economic security of the republic.

First of all, it is necessary to clearly understand that agriculture in Dagestan, where 73,5 % products are produced in households, has no prospects and cannot be accepted as a strategic direction for the organization and development of agricultural production. Overcoming the lag of agriculture and threats to food security requires a radical reorganization and consolidation of agricultural enterprises and organizations, KFH and LPH, breakthrough development and radical modernization of equipment, technology and organization of agricultural production. For radical modernization and long-term sustainable development of agriculture of the republic along the path of intensification, it is necessary to carry out active work on a scientific basis in the following priority strategic areas:

- development and strengthening of scientific and technical potential of the agrarian sphere, deployment of large-scale research on current problems of modernization and progressive development of agriculture;

- overcoming desertification and land degradation, restoring soil fertility, the most complete, effective and rational use of land, water and other natural, as well as production and labor resources;

- improvement of technology and technology, the consecutive transfer of agriculture of the republic from partial to complex mechanization, subsequently - to the stage of the "machine system", and from it to information and biological systems, the basis of which are two key technologies - global positioning systems and genetic engineering;

- increasing crop yields and livestock productivity, large-scale development of seed production, breeding, reclamation and chemicalization;

large-scale and intensive organization of training and advanced training of workers, specialists and managers of farms that meet the modern requirements of scientific and technological progress and market conditions of management;

- consolidation of personal subsidiary farms (labor resources, land plots, machinery, financial resources, etc.) into larger farms for joint organization of production, storage, processing, sale, etc. of agricultural products in various organizational and legal forms (CFS, production cooperatives, production and marketing cooperatives, etc.);

- social development of the village, improvement of the level and quality of life of the rural population, convergence of living conditions of urban and rural residents;

- in each district of Dagestan, to create at least one agro-town as an exemplary settlement (modern standard village), in which agricultural production is organized at the modern level of agricultural technology, all social infrastructure is created at the level of modern standards, all conditions for labor, recreation and development of the entire population, especially young people, such agro-towns will represent standards (models) of long-term development of both rural settlements and small towns, working settlements, industrial areas.

Strategic planning and implementation of measures in these areas will allow in the coming years to overcome the backlog of agriculture and ensure food security of the republic.

In accordance with the May Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 2018, a world-class scientific and educational center should be created in the RD based on the integration of the institutes of the DNC RAS, universities and their cooperation with leading enterprises and organizations of the real sector of the economy.

Overcoming the scientific and technological gap is a strategic priority and a key factor in breakthrough socio-economic development

One of the most acute challenges of our time and the basic condition for solving the main strategic task of breakthrough socio-economic development and overcoming the lag of the Republic of Dagestan is the acceleration of scientific and technological development, modernization and transfer of all sectors and spheres of the economy to an innovative development model with the prospect of reaching the level of the fifth and sixth technological modes. In a modern economy, the most important factor for development and competitiveness is not physical capital and material assets, but knowledge, scientific achievements, their materialization into new technologies, products and services. Taking into account the active integration of Russia into the world economic space and the expected cardinal measures to transfer the country's economy to an innovative development model, Dagestan needs to ensure a genuine scientific and technical revolution in the economy and in all spheres of society.

the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 1 December 2016 № 642 The Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of Russia was approved. It defines the goals, principles, tasks, priorities, as well as the main directions and measures for the implementation of the state policy of scientific and technological development of the country for the coming years 10–15 years. the Government of the Russian Federation 24 June 2017 №1325the Plan of Measures for the Implementation of the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation 2017–2019 years (first stage). The Strategy and the Action Plan provide for active participation in their implementation by authorities at all levels, the scientific, educational and business community, and civil society institutions. The federal strategy is the basis for the development of strategies and state programs of scientific and technological development of the subjects of the Russian Federation. In addition, in the May decree of the President of the Russian Federation 2018 Breakthrough scientific and technological development is defined as one of the national goals of the Russian Federation, as a key strategic task for the period up to 2024 years. It follows from all this that scientific and technological development should be a priority of Dagestan’s new strategy.

We are carrying out some work on scientific and technological development in the framework of the implementation of state programs of the Republic of Dagestan and state programs of the Russian Federation. In particular, according to the state program of RD "Development of industry and increasing its competitiveness in the 2015–2020 years" is carried out modernization of industry, industrial parks are created, according to the state program of RD "Economic Development and Innovative Economy" business incubators, technoparks, industrial (industrial) and agro-industrial parks are developing. the Government of RD 13 December 2013 № 655 the State Program of the Republic of Dagestan "Development of Scientific, Technical and Innovative Potential of the Republic of Dagestan 2014-2018 years”, the goals of which have not been achieved at all, and the planned indicators and indicators have not been achieved in any innovation sphere.

Within the framework of federal state programs and corporate investment programs, measures are being taken to technological modernization of Dagdiesel Plant, Kizlyar Electromechanical Plant Concern, Plant. Gadzhieva", JSC "Dagfos", JSC "Aviaagregat", LLC "DagestanStekloTara" and other enterprises. In order to facilitate research and development, the creation and implementation of innovative developments, the RD Government established an autonomous non-profit organization "Scientific and Innovation Center".

Large-scale work on the development of fundamental and applied science, the solution of current scientific and applied technical and technological problems, the implementation of modern innovative projects is carried out at the institutes of the DNC RAS, higher educational institutions, industry research institutes and laboratories of the Republic of Dagestan.

Innovation processes in Dagestan have been gaining momentum in recent years, but the scale of creation, development in production and promotion of innovative goods, technologies and organizational innovations on the market is completely insufficient to transition to an innovative model of development and ensure the competitiveness of the economy. Enterprises do not have enough developed investment projects aimed at using innovations and developing modern competitive products. The main reason for the low innovative activity of scientific organizations and enterprises engaged in scientific research and development is the limited investment resources due to the difficult financial situation of most of them.

The development of innovation activity is also hampered by the lack of a single managed republican innovation system capable of managing innovative transformations, consolidating all the efforts and resources available to the republic to ensure sustainable economic growth, modernization and competitiveness of the economy.

The innovative infrastructure in the republic is not sufficiently developed, which could ensure the inflow of innovative technologies and developments into production. Developments of scientific organizations of DNC RAS, universities, industry research institutes and inventors remain unclaimed or difficult to implement at specific enterprises of the republic. There is no effective state regulation in this area, and innovatively active enterprises do not receive tangible support.

Research and development in the Republic as at 2016 Mr. Busy 45 Organizations and 1997 The staff, which is 26,1% Number of similar personnel in the NCFD and total 0,3% for the Russian Federation. The total number of researchers in the republic is 1419 People, of whom have scientific degrees of doctor of sciences 232 and Candidate of Sciences 788 person.

In recent years, Dagestan has seen a tendency to weaken the innovation activity of organizations. The share of organizations that implement technological innovations in the 2000 G. was 6,4% and to 2016 G is down to 2,5%, or in 2,6 once. According to this indicator, as of 2016 The country lags far behind Russia as a whole (8,4%) and NCFD (2,9%).

A similar picture is observed in the dynamics of the volume of innovative goods. Their specific weight in the total volume of shipped goods (works, services) in the republic amounted to 2000 St Petersburg. 2,8% (Russian Federation – 4,4%, SKFO – 0,6%), the University of Chicago 2016 St Petersburg. – 0,4% (Russian Federation – 8,5%, SKFO – 6,4%). The significant lag in the development of technology and technology in the RD is evidenced by the fact that the share of the republic in the total number of advanced production technologies created in Russia 2016 Mr. has made 0,4%, and used everything 0,3%.

Of particular concern is the steady trend of declining domestic R&D expenditures as a share of total gross regional product. This share of RD decreased from 0,36% in 2000 M. to 0,17% in 2016 Mr. It should be noted that domestic research and development costs as a percentage of total GRP in RD are lower than in the previous year 8,3 than in Russia, and 1,5 More than ever in the NFL as a whole.

Given such a large-scale lag in all indicators of the technical and technological level, the dominant feature of the new strategy of the republic should be the breakthrough scientific and technological development of all sectors of the economy. First of all, it is necessary to ensure the implementation of the measures provided for by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation “On the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation”. To do this, it is necessary to develop a special state program of scientific and technological development of the republic and a plan for its phased implementation. This program should also reflect measures to ensure the implementation of the May (2018) decree of the President of the Russian Federation, in which among the national goals up to 2024, the breakthrough scientific and technological development is given a central place.

The most important goals and key strategic priorities of Dagestan, arising from these presidential decrees, are: 1) bringing the number of organizations implementing technological innovations to 50% of their total number; 2) a phased increase in research and development costs and bringing the total volume of investments in this area from all sources to 2% GRP.

The Decree of the President of the Russian Federation "On the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation" provides for the formation of an effective modern management system in the field of science, technology and innovation. The first strategic task is to create a clearly oriented to structural modernization of the economy of the republican innovation system, uniting and coordinating the innovative activities of all academic and branch scientific departments, universities, research, design and technological links of enterprises, organizations, business associations. To determine the innovation policy and successful management of this republican innovation system, there is a need to form a state innovation management body in the status of the republican Ministry (Agency, Committee) of Science and Higher Education. The main functions and priorities of such a body, in our opinion, should be:

- definition of long-term strategy and republican policy of innovative development and structural modernization of the economy and other spheres of life of Dagestan society;

coordination of innovative activities of academic institutions, branch research institutes, universities, design and development organizations, enterprises and economic associations operating in Dagestan;

- implementation of a complete inventory and accounting of existing innovations in the republic (discoveries, inventions, new high technologies, new competitive goods and services, high-tech developments, etc.), drawing up their register, selecting from them relevant for commercialization in the economy of the republic, identifying industries and areas of activity where they can be used, as well as bodies and officials responsible for introducing each innovation into production;

- identification of current and forecast long-term problems and bottlenecks in each sector of the economy and social sphere, for the solution of which it is necessary to conduct scientific research and research; organization of solving these problems and cracking bottlenecks with the involvement of academic and industry institutions, universities, inventors, small venture capital organizations, specialists of enterprises, organizations, ministries and departments on a competitive and contractual (contractual) basis.

It is advisable to re-subordinate the autonomous non-profit organization "Scientific and Innovation Center" to this ministry, determine the scope of activities and widely expand its work on the creation and implementation of innovative developments, assistance in research and development.

At the same time, in accordance with the May Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 2018, a world-class scientific and educational center should be created in the RD on the basis of the integration of the institutes of the DNC RAS, universities and their cooperation with leading enterprises and organizations of the real economy.

Further strengthening of innovation potential, development of innovation activity, use of modern achievements of science and high technologies will allow to carry out structural diversification, transfer the economy of the Republic of Dagestan to an innovative model of development and in the long-term strategic perspective to ensure its competitiveness in regional, domestic and world markets. This should be facilitated by a republican innovation system, the creation of which is an objective necessity. The solution of these tasks is one of the main goals and priorities of the new strategy of the Republic of Dagestan.

Project materials · Full published text

NATIONAL PROJECTS

Source status: archive

A review of national projects is a reference context for development programmes.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/natsionalnye-proekty.html

Open on the site

ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL PROJECTS

1. Young people and children 2. Family 3. Personnel 4. Prolonged and active life 5. Infrastructure for life 6. Environmental well-being 7. Tourism and hospitality 8. Efficient and competitive economy 9. International Cooperation and Exports 10. Data Economy and Digital Transformation of the State 11. Efficient transport system

NATIONAL PROJECTS TO ENSURE TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP

12. New Health Saving Technologies 13. Unmanned aircraft systems 14. New nuclear and energy technologies 15. New Materials and Chemistry 16. Industrial provision of transport mobility 17. Development of Multi-Satellite Orbital Grouping (MSP) 18. Means of production and automation 19. Technology for food security

2

NATIONAL PROJECT "Youth and Children"

Deputy Chairman of the Government: D. N. Chernyshenko Responsible FOV: Rosmolodezh Project manager: G. A. Gurov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Formation and development of a generation of Russian citizens, patriotic, moral and responsible, capable of ensuring the sovereignty, competitiveness and further development of Russia

• Realization of the potential of each person,

development of his talents, education of a patriotic and socially responsible personality

• Comfortable and safe living environment • Sustainable and dynamic economy

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Russia - country of opportunities • We are together • Russia in the world

• All the best for children • Leading schools • Educators and mentors

• Establishing a network of modern campuses • Universities for a generation of leaders • Professionals

3

NATIONAL PROJECT "Youth and Children"

Key activities of the national project

• Implemented 6942 Activities aimed at

education of the younger generation of personality formation in the framework of the largest children's movement of the country - the Movement of the First.

• Participation in the program "More than a trip"

C 2030 the Year of the Host 390 Thousands of people.

• Attraction of 20 thousand people to the holding

World Youth Festival.

• Educational and production centers (clusters) and educational clusters of secondary vocational education have been created.

• Creation of a network of world-class campuses in universities. • Implementation of the largest in the state program of university support program "Priority-2030".

• Training of highly qualified

• Created a single digital profile of foreign

student on the basis of the superservice "Entry into the university online".

engineering personnel, for which advanced engineering schools will be created.

• Teaching Russian Language and Subjects in Russian

• One-time compensation

language abroad.

• In all districts of the Russian Federation formed

network of 12 advanced schools.

• Built 150 Schools.

payments to teachers in the framework of the program "Land Teacher" for 7,5 thousand people.

• Annually provided more than 800 thousand payments

Rewards for good leadership.

4

NATIONAL PROJECT "Youth and Children"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Enrolment of students in the system of measures to identify, support

• Proportion of young people who believe in opportunities

development of their abilities and talents based on the principles of responsibility, justice, universality and aimed at self-determination and professional orientation - 100 %.

• Proportion of young people participating in projects

and programs aimed at professional, personal development and patriotic education - 75,1 %.

• Proportion of young people involved

Voluntary and social activities - 45,8 %.

• Number of foreign students enrolled in

educational programs of higher education in Russian educational organizations of higher education and scientific organizations - 500 thousand people.

Self-realization in Russia - 85 %.

• Share of projects in the field of culture, art and folk

Creativity funded by state development institutions, within which the promotion and protection of traditional Russian spiritual and moral values is provided - 80 %.

• The index of creating conditions for the education of a harmoniously developed, patriotic and socially responsible personality on the basis of traditional Russian spiritual, moral, cultural and historical values is 95 %.

• The share of teaching staff for all levels of education who have been trained in additional professional education programs on the basis of updated professional standards on the basis of leading educational institutions of higher education and scientific organizations is 10 %.

5

NATIONAL PROJECT "Families"

Acting Deputy Prime Minister: T. A. Golikova Responsible FOIV: Ministry of Labor of Russia Project Manager: A. Oh. Kotyakov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Increase in the number of families with children, including those with many children, strengthening family values

• Preservation of the population, improvement of health and well-being of people, family support • Realization of the potential of each person, development of his talents, education of patriotic

and socially responsible person

• Comfortable and safe living environment

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Family support • Large family • Maternity and child protection

• Older generation • Family values and cultural infrastructure

6

NATIONAL PROJECT "Families"

Key activities of the national project

• Creation of at least 1 000 rooms for mother and child

and groups of short-term stay of children. in educational institutions of higher education. • Provision of maternity capital for improvement of living conditions, education, pension savings, etc.

• Provision of single allowance to needy families. • Provision of "Family mortgage" (more than 1,5 million families)

with children).

• Provision of an annual family payment. • Targeted construction of at least 100 kindergartens in certain settlements with objectively identified infrastructure needs.

• Equipping educational spaces not less than 2,2 thousand

Kindergarten.

• Implementation in 41 region of regional programs

Increase in birth rate.

• Provision of state social assistance

on the basis of a social contract annually at least 220 thousand families (priority - many children).

• Provision of regional support measures to large families, implementation of regional measures to increase the birth rate in the development of the Presidential Decree No. 63. • Provision of mortgage repayment payments

Large families with children in the amount of 450 thousand rubles. in order to improve housing conditions.

• Establishing an annual order 1 000 Extended day groups for students 1–4 Classes in Educational Organizations. • Establishment 336 Women 's Consultations ( RF Subjects

and FMBA of Russia).

• Medical supplies 133 perinatal

Centers, maternity hospitals of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and 9 perinatal centers of the Ministry of Health of Russia and the Federal Medical Academy of Russia.

• Medical devices 180 Children ' s hospitals • Acquisition 526 Mobile medical complexes

for children's clinics in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and 10 - for children's clinics FMBA of Russia.

• Implementation 485 Thousands of IVF cycles. • Implementation of regional programmes on maternal health and

childhood in all regions.

7

NATIONAL PROJECT "Families"

Key activities of the national project

• Repair of 43 objects of social services. • Implementation of regional programs "Active longevity"

in all regions.

• More than 31 thousand developing and educational

events in communication centers for older citizens.

• Construction and modernization of not less than 1011 regional

and municipal children's art schools.

• Modernization of at least 450 cultural institutions

in settlements with numbers up to 500 Thousands at least 420 Regional and municipal libraries, at least 100 Theatres and 250 Museums in regional and municipal ownership

• Creation of 2,5 thousand model libraries, 310 memorable places,

related to the military history of Russia.

• Implementation of 1,3 thousand creative projects of NGOs to strengthen Russian civil identity on the basis of spiritual moral and cultural values of the peoples of Russia, 390 creative projects aimed at preserving and popularizing traditional values, 144 exhibition projects of federal and regional museums in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

• Conducted 479 cultural and educational programs

for students.

• Competition "This is our family" - 600 thousand people

participants of the competition.

• At least 280 million tickets for attending events

• Equipment not less than 410 regional and municipal

Using the Pushkin card.

Theaters in cities with a population of more than 300 thousand people, 2,1 thousand regional and municipal museums, 3,6 thousand children's schools of arts and schools with musical instruments, equipment and educational materials, 2,4 thousand cinema halls with modern equipment in settlements up to 500 thousand people, in which national films are provided.

• Provision of long-term care services not less than 500

Thousands of people need such care.

• Commissioning of at least 122 objects for accommodation of citizens in stationary organizations of social services in the subjects of the Russian Federation (more than 6,9 thousand places).

8

NATIONAL PROJECT "Families"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Increase in total fertility rate.

• Level of job satisfaction

• Poverty reduction.

State and municipal organizations of culture, art and folk art - 63 %.

• Total third-party fertility rate

• Number of playback centers created

and subsequent children - 0,475 units.

• Proportion of older persons and persons with disabilities receiving

Long-term care, of the total number of citizens in need of such care - 30,3 %.

Audiovisual content in small settlements with a population of up to 50 thousand people, equipped with the necessary equipment and connected to a single digital platform with a library of modern products of the Russian film industry - 900 units.

9

NATIONAL PROJECT "KADRY"

Acting Deputy Prime Minister: T. A. Golikova Responsible FOIV: Ministry of Labor of Russia Project Manager: A. Oh. Kotyakov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Satisfying the economy’s need for personnel through additional involvement in employment

Preserving the population, promoting health and well-being, supporting the family A sustainable and dynamic economy

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Labour market management • Education for the labour market

• Active measures to promote employment •

10

NATIONAL PROJECT "KADRY"

Key activities of the national project

• Formation and annual updating of the forecast

The needs of the economy in personnel for a five-year period.

• For analysis of the personnel need for professional

In terms of qualification, an all-Russian survey of employers and experts will be conducted annually (since 2026 on the basis of the EDS "Work in Russia").

• Modernization of more than 1,5 thousand employment centers

Population.

• Annual increase in the minimum wage to reach 2030

the target value established by Decree No. 309 (subparagraph "m" of paragraph 2).

• Annual formation of the rating of educational organizations of secondary vocational and higher education on the level of employment and salaries of graduates.

• Formed a flexible system of professional

standards. The list of professional activities has been updated.

• Improved system of 238 career centers

base of higher education organizations.

• Vocational training and additional vocational training

education of more than 120 thousand employees of defense industry organizations.

• Independent assessment of the qualifications of 390 thousand people. • Methodical recommendations on the organization of the system of vocational guidance and routing of students and graduates of organizations of secondary vocational and higher education, as well as young professionals to specific enterprises (organizations of the region) were developed.

• Development of two scientific and educational clusters to ensure

personnel needs of high-tech productions of Rosatom, in monotowns and ZATO.

• Vocational training and further education

about 104 thousand people annually from among certain categories of citizens in demanded professions.

• Implementation of the All-Russian Youth Development Program

entrepreneurship in order to increase the proportion of young people employed by SMEs.

• Subsidization of equipment not less than 33,5 thousand jobs

for disabled people, including participants of the SVO.

• Encouragement of employers to employ certain categories of citizens for the purpose of employment of about 29,7 thousand people.

11

NATIONAL PROJECT "KADRY"

Key activities of the national project

• Employer attraction from another

About 9,8 thousand workers in demand in the region within the framework of the program "Mobility 2.0".

• The All-Russian Employment Fair, the Professions Festival were held in order to popularize working professions, as well as the Youth Employment Practices Competition.

• More than 8 thousand qualified specialists were attracted within the framework of regional programs to increase the mobility of labor resources for the implementation of large projects in priority sectors of the economy.

• All - Russian Professional Competition

skills "Best in profession" in order to popularize working professions (with an increase in the number of nominations from 5 to 20).

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Reduction of staff deficit by increasing

The base year is 103,4 %.

12

NATIONAL PROJECT "LONG-TERM AND ACTIVE LIFE"

Acting Deputy Prime Minister: T. A. Golikova Responsible FOIV: Ministry of Health of Russia Project Manager: M. A. Murashko

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Increase in life expectancy to 78 years by 2030 and to 81 by 2036, including a faster increase in healthy life expectancy

Preservation of the population, health and well-being of people, family support

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Upgrading of primary care

• Hepatitis C control and risk minimization

the Russian Federation Health

spread of the disease

• Cardiovascular control

• Improvement of emergency

Diseases

Medical Care

• Cancer control • Diabetes control

• Optimum for health recovery

Medical Rehabilitation

• National digital platform "Health" • Development of Federal State University and network NIRC • Health for each • Medical personnel

13

NATIONAL PROJECT "LONG-TERM AND ACTIVE LIFE"

Key activities of the national project

• Provided remote monitoring of health status using medical devices with remote data transmission to patients with circulatory system diseases, diabetes mellitus and a number of other diseases.

• Based on timely and modern diagnostics

Prevention of the progression of coronary heart disease and the development of its complications in patients under dispensary supervision.

• In the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, the routing of patients with oncological diseases is organized on the basis of the procedure for providing medical care, taking into account clinical recommendations and ensuring the territorial availability of medical care.

• Equipped with regional, inter-district (district)

centers providing medical care to patients with carbohydrate metabolism disorders and diabetes mellitus.

• Children with diabetes 1 type of age from 2-x to 17 years

are provided with continuous glucose monitoring systems, including those of Russian production.

• Achieved a stable virological response in patients with

chronic viral hepatitis C, who have completed a course of antiviral therapy.

• A modern infrastructure of reception offices has been created

the use of modular structures to provide emergency medical care to patients with life-threatening conditions (new construction using modular structures).

• Secure data network for the industry

Health.

• The creation, implementation and operation of a single digital platform that contributes to the maintenance and preservation of human health.

14

NATIONAL PROJECT "LONG-TERM AND ACTIVE LIFE"

Key activities of the national project

• An in-depth study and correction of the diets of the population in the subjects of the Russian Federation was carried out in order to eliminate the deficit of macro- and micronutrients, taking into account regional characteristics.

• Expanded national medical network

research centers for the implementation of organizational and methodological support of medical organizations of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation on the profiles of medical care.

• Adult health centers organized on the basis of

Departments (offices) of medical prevention in the CRB, RB, including in remote settlements.

• Provided referral of doctors, including "watchmen

method”, in medical organizations of the subjects of the Russian Federation.

• Trained in secondary vocational education programmes under contracts providing for a commitment to employment.

• An information and communication campaign was conducted to increase the commitment of citizens to lead a healthy lifestyle and correct risk factors for diseases.

15

NATIONAL PROJECT "LONG-TERM AND ACTIVE LIFE"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Proportion of persons living 5 years or more since the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm - 67 %.

• Increase in the number of persons with circulatory diseases

those who lived the previous year without acute cardiovascular events - 10 %.

• The proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus 1 and 2 types who are under clinical observation in regional medical units created and equipped during the federal project from the number of persons subject to such observation is 85 %.

• Proportion of persons with chronic non-communicable diseases who are under clinical observation at the doctor-therapist site who received medical services in the framework of clinical observation during the reporting period from all patients with chronic non-communicable diseases who are under clinical observation at the doctor-therapist site - 70 %.

• Proportion of persons admitted to primary health care

Sanitary assistance by one mobile unit per year, from the estimated capacity of one mobile unit - 100 %.

• Proportion of patients under proactive surveillance

The health status of users of remote data transmission equipment is 20 %.

• Satisfaction of the population with medical care

According to the results of public opinion assessment - 55,2 %.

• Proportion of population with access to primary health care in modernized medical units - 100 %.

• Proportion of citizens leading a healthy lifestyle – 13,6 %. • Healthy life expectancy – 68 years. • Life expectancy at birth – 78 years. • Life expectancy at birth rural

Population: 76,9 years.

16

NATIONAL PROJECT "LONG-TERM AND ACTIVE LIFE"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Screening coverage for antibodies to viral hepatitis C

• Percentage of patients treated with high-tech

Persons from high-risk groups - 7,52 %.

• Provision of medical care to the population

in medical organizations participating in the implementation of the program of state guarantees of free provision of medical care to citizens 10 Thousands of people – 43,46 person.

• Increase in the share of patients admitted to a bed for a one-day stay in the admissions departments of medical organisations providing round-the-clock inpatient care, out of all patients admitted to round-the-clock inpatient care—1.24 %. • Reduction in the total duration of temporary

Incapacity to work for the disease of working citizens - 85%

Medical care in modernized federal medical, scientific and educational (if clinics are available) organizations, from the total number of patients who have been provided with high-tech medical care in federal medical, scientific and educational (if clinics are available) organizations - 57 %.

• Differentiation of life expectancy at

Births between urban and rural populations – 1,48 years. • Increased number of people receiving medical care

Medical rehabilitation - 26,5 %.

• Proportion of patients with socially significant chronic

Non-communicable diseases, which are available for proactive monitoring of health status using digital services - 100 %.

• Proportion of patients cured of chronic viral hepatitis

C, provided with drugs - 95 %.

17

NATIONAL PROJECT "INFRASTRUCTURE FOR LIFE"

Acting Deputy Prime Minister: M. Sh. Khusnullin Responsible FOV: Ministry of Construction of Russia, Ministry of Transport of Russia, Ministry of Finance of Russia, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Project Manager: I. Uh. Faizullin

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Providing citizens with infrastructure (residential, transport, social, communal) of new quality

Comfortable and safe environment for living

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Infrastructure development in human settlements • Housing • Modernization of municipal infrastructure • Creating a comfortable urban environment • Road safety • Development of public transport

• Development of the federal network • Regional and local road network • System-wide development measures

Road Economy

• New rhythm of construction

• Mortgage • Railway development

Infrastructure of the Central Transport Hub

18

NATIONAL PROJECT "INFRASTRUCTURE FOR LIFE"

Key activities of the national project

• Comprehensive renewal of human settlements, including

• Improvement of housing conditions of Russian citizens

implementation of projects for the integrated development of territories, development and implementation of programs for the development of strongholds, development of master plans for large and small cities.

• Development of individual housing construction, provision of the necessary infrastructure of land plots for the development of housing construction, including housing.

• Improvement of targeted preferential mortgage programs and development of alternative mechanisms for housing acquisition.

Federation.

• Modernization of municipal infrastructure.

• Reduction in investment duration

The construction cycle.

• Introduction of artificial intelligence technologies in

construction industry.

• Training and involvement of specialists in construction

industry.

• Organization of road safety measures

• Uninhabitable accommodation

of Motion.

Fund.

• Implementation of measures for the formation of modern

urban environment, including the improvement of public areas, projects of the winners of the All-Russian competition of the best projects for creating a comfortable urban environment.

• Construction of new and repair of existing roads of federal, regional and local significance.

• Road development.

• Public transport update.

• Construction and reconstruction activities

(modernization) of drinking water supply facilities.

• Development of railway infrastructure of the CTU.

19

NATIONAL PROJECT "INFRASTRUCTURE FOR LIFE"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Improvement of the quality of the environment for living in the reference population

• Ensuring significant growth in energy and resource resources

settlements by 30%.

efficiency in construction and maintenance.

• Updating the housing stock by at least 20%

compared to 2019.

• Connection to natural gas not less than 1,6 million houses • Increase in the regulatory status of highways

• Provision of citizens with housing with a total area of at least 33

federal value to 85 %.

sq. m. per person.

• Sustainable reduction of uninhabitable

housing fund.

• Improvement of at least 30 thousand public territories, implementation of at least 1600 projects of the winners of the All-Russian competition for creating a comfortable urban environment.

• Reduction in investment and construction duration

cycle up to 1000 days.

• Increase in the standard condition of regional and inter-municipal roads to 60 %. • Increase in the standard condition of highways

largest urban agglomerations up to 85 %.

• Increase in the regulatory status of roads,

network up to 85 %.

• Reduction in road traffic deaths

accidents in 1,5 times (1,58 people on 10 thousand vehicles).

• Implementation of the program of modernization

• Increase in the share of public transport not older than

infrastructure and improved public services for 20 million people.

• Construction and reconstruction (modernization) of not less than 2 thousand drinking water supply and water treatment facilities

standard service life not less than 85%.

20

NATIONAL PROJECT "ECOLOGICAL WELFARE"

Deputy Chairman of the Government: D. N. Patrushev Responsible FOIV: Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia Project Manager: A. A. Kozlov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

Preservation and restoration of the environment in order to improve environmental well-being, including in the framework of measures to eliminate accumulated environmental damage, the use of secondary resources, secondary raw materials from waste in economic sectors, improving the system of solid municipal waste management, reducing emissions of dangerous pollutants into the atmospheric air, improving water bodies, reducing the volume of untreated wastewater, preserving forests, preserving and restoring rare species of animals, developing a system of specially protected natural areas and promoting environmental protection.

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Environmental Well-being

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• General cleaning • Closed cycle economy

• Conservation of biological diversity

and development of ecological tourism

• Clean air • Water of Russia

• Save

Forests

21

NATIONAL PROJECT "ECOLOGICAL WELFARE"

Key activities of the national project

• Industry application programs implemented

secondary resources and secondary raw materials from waste in the fields of construction and utilities, agriculture and industry.

• In the cities participating in the federal project, the total volume of emissions, including hazardous pollutants, into the atmospheric air is reduced due to the implementation of the measures provided for in the integrated plans.

• Secondary resource utilization capacity and

Production of secondary raw materials

• Measures to improve environmental

status of the hydrographic network.

• Measures were taken to preserve and restore some rare and endangered wildlife objects.

• Solids management infrastructure established

municipal waste, including in the Baikal natural territory.

• The most dangerous objects of accumulated harm to the environment, including those located on the territory of the industrial site in Usolye-Siberian, on the site of industrial waste "Red Bor" and formed as a result of the activities of OJSC "BBC".

• Reconstructed (modernized) and built treatment facilities for the treatment of contaminated wastewater, including entering Lake Baikal.

• Measures to increase the area

Reforestation in non-lease forest areas, including around cities and industrial centers.

• Tourist infrastructure in specially protected natural areas of federal significance was created and equipped

22

NATIONAL PROJECT "ECOLOGICAL WELFARE"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Reduction in untreated wastewater discharged into

• Number of visitors to specially protected natural areas

Main water bodies – 9 215,1 million cubic meters. m. (to 15%).

federal value - 20,6 million people.

• Reduction of total emissions of hazardous substances

Contaminants in 29 cities participating in the federal project - 80% (20%).

• The ratio of the area of reforestation and forestation to the area of felled and dead forest plantations is 112 %.

• Use of secondary resources and raw materials from waste

in the economy - 25 %.

• Reduction of negative impact on Central

The ecological zone of the Baikal natural territory is 54,7% (for 41,6%).

• Number of people who have been eliminated

and environmental objects of accumulated damage to the environment - 50 pcs.

23

NATIONAL PROJECT "Tourism and Hospitality"

Deputy Chairman of the Government: D. N. Chernyshenko Responsible FOV: Ministry of Economic Development of Russia Project Manager: M. Mr. Reshetnikov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

• Increasing the role of the tourism industry in the country's economy and increasing the number of tourist trips to 140 million by 2030

A sustainable and dynamic economy

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Creation of a room fund • Sea resorts

• Tourist

attractiveness of the country

• Personnel • Industrial support for tourism

24

NATIONAL PROJECT "Tourism and Hospitality"

Key activities of the national project

• Preferential lending for the construction of large hotels from 120 rooms and tourist attractions (ski resorts, water parks, year-round amusement parks) - 59 thousand new rooms and an increase in the number of visits to the created infrastructure for recreation and entertainment to 23 million people per year.

• Creation of year-round seaside resorts - 11 projects in 9 subjects of the Russian Federation - more than 72 thousand new rooms and 80 thousand jobs.

• Construction of modular non-capital funds

accommodation - 10 thousand new rooms.

• Unified subsidy to subjects of the Russian Federation

Events, improvement of historical city centers, development of beaches and tourist routes, creation of non-capital berthing infrastructure will provide an increase in tourist trips by 7,4 million.

• Development and operation

information systems aimed at implementing public services and functions in the tourism sector, creating a single digital platform, including 18 digital services, including identification of at least 35 000 Participants in the tourism services market. • Organization of a feedback system with all participants of the tourism industry. The index of satisfaction of citizens in tourism and hospitality will reach 80 %.

• Training 89 regional program teams

formation of a regional product for domestic tourism under the programs of additional professional education.

• Training 96 regional teams for the formation and

promotion of international tourism product to foreign markets.

• Productivity improvement projects in 57

organizations in the field of tourism in the direction of "Lean production".

• Development of educational and methodological complexes and conducting

training of personnel for the tourism and hospitality industry up to 53 thousand students.

• A mechanism has been created to stimulate demand for domestic products for the tourism industry to sell 11,8 thousand domestic products for the tourism industry, including equipment for ski resorts, cable cars, as well as equipment for amusement parks and domestic tourist buses.

25

NATIONAL PROJECT "Tourism and Hospitality"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• The share of the tourism industry in the gross domestic product is 5 %.

• Number of tourist trips in the territory of the Russian Federation

- 140 million

• Exports of tourism services – $10,75 billion

26

NATIONAL PROJECT "Effective and competitive economy"

Acting Deputy Prime Minister: A. B. Novak Responsible FOIV: Ministry of Economic Development of Russia Project Manager: M. Mr. Reshetnikov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Ensuring sustainable economic development based on competition, entrepreneurship, including high-tech, and private initiative

A sustainable and dynamic economy

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Labour productivity • Increase in investment activity • Development of competition

• Low carbon development • Financial market development • Technologies

• Small and medium-sized enterprises

and support of individual entrepreneurial initiative

27

NATIONAL PROJECT "Effective and competitive economy"

Key activities of the national project

• Extrabudgetary investments in core

• Technology projects financed

capital of SMEs who have gained access to industrial (industrial) parks, agro-industrial parks, business parks, technoparks, industrial technoparks.

• Implementation of innovative projects with the aim of

stimulation of creation of small technology companies, involvement of achievements of science and technology in production, creation of jobs and development of innovative infrastructure.

• Subjects of small and medium-sized businesses have secured the attraction of financing through guarantees (independent guarantees) of lending assistance funds (guarantee funds, guarantee funds).

• Guarantee system is in place

under life insurance contracts.

sovereignty and structural adaptation of the economy of the Russian Federation (the total cost of projects).

• Enterprises of basic non-resource sectors of the economy were involved in the implementation of projects to increase labor productivity.

• In the constituent entities of the Russian Federation

Methodological support of the Federal Competence Center created regional competence centers to improve labor productivity. Through industry competence centers, created including in organizations of the social sphere, the best practices of process organization (box solutions) based on lean production technologies have been introduced.

• Greenhouse gas emissions register is developed,

Integration with other state and departmental information systems, including the register of carbon units, the national greenhouse gas inventory, was carried out.

28

NATIONAL PROJECT "Effective and competitive economy"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Increase in labor productivity in the Russian economy

• Increase in the volume of investments in fixed assets - 60 %.

The Federation in relation to 2023 year - 20,7 %.

• The share of medium and large enterprises in the basic non-primary sectors of the economy involved in the implementation of projects aimed at increasing labor productivity, the cumulative total is 40 %.

• Share of state and municipal organizations

The social sphere involved in the implementation of projects aimed at increasing labor productivity, the total result is 100 %.

• Real increase in income per employee of the subject

Small and medium-sized enterprises - 28,1 %.

• National climate monitoring system established

active substances - 1 pcs.

• Adaptation programs approved and implemented

climate at the federal, regional and corporate levels - 106 units.

• Revenue of small technology companies

– 1 950,48 billion rub.

• The volume of capitalization of the stock market relative to GDP is 66 %.

• Share of long-term savings of citizens in the total amount of their

Savings - 40 %.

29

NATIONAL PROJECT "INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND EXPORT"

Deputy Chairman of the Government: D. B. Manturov Responsible FOV: Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia Project Manager: A. A. Alikhanov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Increase in the volume of exports of non-primary non-energy goods and products of the agro-industrial complex, as well as the creation of foreign export support infrastructure

• Security to 2030 the Non-Commodity Non-Energy Export Growth

not less than on 2/3 Compared to the indicator 2023 years

• Increase by 2030 year of export of products of agro-industrial complex not less than

1,5 times compared to 2021

• Forming a network of sustainable partnerships with foreign countries and establishing

necessary infrastructure for foreign economic activity, technological and industrial cooperation and development of new markets

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Industrial export • Creation of foreign infrastructure

• Systemic measures for the development of international cooperation and export • Exports of agricultural products

30

NATIONAL PROJECT "INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND EXPORT"

Key activities of the national project

• After-sales service of exported high-tech products is provided (it is sold since 2027).

• Increased volume of Russian industrial supplies

compensation of part of the costs of R&D and (or) homologation of existing industrial products for foreign markets.

• High-tech export volume achieved

products within the framework of export projects (transactions) with the use of concessional lending of JSC RUSEXIMBANK, VEB.RF.

• The volume of deliveries of industrial products to foreign markets increased due to compensation to exporters of part of the planned costs for its transportation.

• Increased number of Russian certificates of conformity

of industrial products to the requirements of foreign markets due to compensation of a part of the corresponding costs (it is realized from 2027).

• Transport and logistics centers and Russian

industrial zones in the reference countries.

• Domestic non-oil products transported

non-energy exports by providing a preferential tariff to logistics operators as part of the creation of new international transport and logistics routes.

• The standard for ensuring favorable conditions for the development of export activities (Regional export standard 2.0) has been introduced in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

• The services of the digital ecosystem "One Window" of the exporter on the basis of the digital platform of JSC "Russian Export Center" were created.

31

NATIONAL PROJECT "INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND EXPORT"

Key activities of the national project

• The planned volume of export of products has been achieved due to reimbursement to organizations of part of the costs associated with participation in international exhibition and fair events (implemented since 2027).

• ANO DPO "School of Export of JSC "Russian Export Center" implemented educational programs aimed at developing competencies in the field of foreign economic activity, with the participation of youth and students.

• Information received

consulting support of ANO "Information and analytical center on foreign trade issues".

• Export volume increased due to the implementation of the program of promotion of Russian products under the national brand "Made in Russia" in the markets of friendly countries.

• Increased volume of Russian industrial supplies

products to foreign markets through concessional lending to organizations implementing corporate competitiveness programs.

• Products transported using

compensation for part of the costs of transportation of agricultural products.

• Concessional short-term and investment loans were issued in order to increase the volume of production of export products of the agro-industrial complex.

• Certificates for exported agricultural products were issued as part of the Rosselkhoznadzor’s activities to ensure its access to foreign markets.

32

NATIONAL PROJECT "INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND EXPORT"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Exports of non-commodity non-energy goods

• Volume of foreign trade transactions using instruments

Nominal prices) – $248,1 billion

REC Group – $23,3 billion

• Exports of goods in industries

• Export volume of agricultural products (in

Nominal prices) – $192,9 billion

Nominal prices) – $55,2 billion

• Exports of non-commodity non-energy goods in

Friendly countries (at nominal prices) – $206,1 billion

• Growth in exports of non-resource non-energy

goods to the indicator of 2023 year - 67 %.

• Coverage of core countries by Russian infrastructure for maintenance

foreign economic activity and ensuring production and cooperation coherence - 23,08 %.

33

NATIONAL PROJECT "DATA ECONOMY AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE STATE"

Deputy Chairman of the Government: D. J. Grigorenko Responsible FOV: Ministry of Finance of Russia Project manager: M. I. Shadayev

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Digital transformation of state and municipal management, economy and social sphere through ensuring cybersecurity, uninterrupted access to the Internet, training of qualified personnel for the IT industry, digital public administration, development of domestic digital platforms, software, promising developments and artificial intelligence

Digital transformation of state and municipal management, economy and social sphere

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Internet access infrastructure

• Digital platforms in industries

• Digital Public Administration • Domestic Solutions • Applied Research

Social sphere

and prospective developments

• Cybersecurity Infrastructure • Digital Transformation Personnel • Government Statistics • Artificial Intelligence

34

NATIONAL PROJECT "DATA ECONOMY AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE STATE"

Key activities of the national project

• Upgraded platform

DAC GIS statistics.

• Low-orbit satellite constellation

• Mobile base stations 4G/5G with open architecture of OpenRAN operator class of domestic production. • Prototypes of quantum processors with speed of calculation

providing broadband access to the Internet.

up to 300 qubits.

• 6 industry platforms in the social sphere. • In state and municipal educational

• Quantum communications up to 15 thousand km • Technological support for the introduction of promising technologies

organizations have formed an IT infrastructure to ensure safe access to state, municipal and other information systems, as well as to the Internet information and telecommunications network.

• Research in the field of AI for development

breakthrough technologies.

• 500 data sets for use in various fields

and industries.

(6G) in telecommunications.

• Unified online data exchange platform for counteraction

Fraudulent actions against citizens.

• Information system to counteract personal leaks

data by identifying and blocking phishing sites.

• Annual security audit 43 key GIS. • Upgraded automated security system

traffic security of the Russian segment of the Internet (ASBI). • 450 thousand trained schoolchildren and college students in IT and AI

• 10,2 thousand graduates trained in higher education programs

on digital educational platforms.

Education for Top Professionals in the Field AI. • Development of infrastructure information systems

e-Governments (feedback, FOV and ROV data showcases, etc.).

• 100 mass socially significant state and municipal services provided in a proactive mode or at the time of application.

• 400 thousand college students and high school students trained

modern programming languages, technologies AI and robotics.

• 250 thousands of students who have undergone practice-oriented training in higher education organizations on IT programs with the participation of accredited IT companies.

• 3,5 thousand graduates trained in educational programs

higher education for top specialists in the field of information technology.

35

NATIONAL PROJECT "DATA ECONOMY AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE STATE"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Proportion of households that are able to

• Proportion of public services for which the average

High-quality high-speed broadband access to the Internet information and telecommunications network is 97 %.

• Share of Russian organizations in key sectors of the economy

switched to the use of basic and applied Russian software in systems that provide basic production and management processes - 80 %.

• The share of Russian software used in the activities of state bodies, state corporations, state companies and business companies, in the authorized capital of which the share of the Russian Federation in aggregate exceeds 50 %, as well as in their affiliated legal entities - 95 %.

• Percentage of fraud attempts prevented

committed using information and telecommunication technologies (compared to 2024) - 150 %.

• The share of traffic of the Russian segment of the information and telecommunications network "Internet", annually processed by the automated security system (ASBI), taking into account its annual growth - 98 %.

assessment of satisfaction with the quality of work of civil servants and employees of social sector organizations on their provision in electronic form using the Unified State University and (or) the Unified State University above 4,5 - 75 %.

• Achievement of “digital maturity” of state and municipal management and key sectors of the social sphere, involving the automation of most transactions within the framework of single industry digital platforms and data-based management model, taking into account the accelerated introduction of technologies for processing large amounts of data, machine learning and artificial intelligence - 46,7 %.

• The share of mass socially significant state and municipal services provided in electronic form is 99 %.

• Proportion of public authorities and local authorities

Self-government, connected to a single digital platform for the selection, development and rotation of personnel - 60 %.

• Number of mass socially significant state

and municipal services in electronic form, available using a single portal of public services, the process of providing which is provided by departments in a proactive mode or at the time of application of the applicant - 100 units.

36

NATIONAL PROJECT "EFFICIENCY TRANSPORT SYSTEM"

Acting Deputy Prime Minister: B. Mr. Savelyev Responsible FOV: Ministry of Transport of Russia Project Manager: R. B. Starovoit

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Formation of an effective transport system that meets the demand of the population and the economy of the Russian Federation, due to the development of the backbone infrastructure of the Unified Support Transport Network

Sustainable and dynamic economy, comfortable and safe environment for living

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• High-speed railway lines • Big SMP • Railway development

• Sea ports • Inland waterways • Airfield development

• Development of checkpoints • Digital transformation of transport • Personnel of the transport industry

37

NATIONAL PROJECT "EFFICIENCY TRANSPORT SYSTEM"

Key activities of the national project

• High-speed railway between Moscow and St. Petersburg (travel time between the capitals will be reduced to 2 hours 15 minutes).

• 14 rescue vessels, 4 nuclear icebreakers, 4

icebreakers on organic fuel, 1 multifunctional nuclear-technical service vessel in the waters of the Northern Sea Route.

• 150 million tons of iron capacity increase

roads in the East, Azov-Black Sea and North-West directions, as well as on the North-South ITC. *

• 225 million tons of capacity growth of seaports

in the East, Azov-Black Sea and North-West directions, as well as on the North-South ITC.

• No less than 75 modernized airfield complexes.

• 27 built and reconstructed priority points

Pass through the state border of the Russian Federation.

• National Digital Transport and Logistics Platform.

* Parameters are indicated indicatively and can be clarified following the consideration of the investment program of JSC "Russian Railways" at meetings in the Government of the Russian Federation and meetings of the Board of Directors of JSC "Russian Railways" for the relevant period

38

NATIONAL PROJECT "EFFICIENCY TRANSPORT SYSTEM"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Aviation mobility of the population of the Russian Federation

• Volume of cargo transportation in the Northern Sea Route

- 1,08 units

- 109,1 million tons.

• Growth of infrastructure capacity of the Unified Support

The transport network is 182 %.

39

NATIONAL PROJECT "NEW HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES"

Acting Deputy Prime Minister: T. A. Golikova Responsible FOV: Ministry of Health of Russia, Ministry of Education and Science of Russia, Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia Project Manager: T. A. Golikova

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

A set of measures aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of medical research and development and creating conditions for the implementation of their results, including preventive medicine and longevity technologies, as well as ensuring technological sovereignty in the field of production (production) of medicines, biomedical cellular products, tissue engineering products and medical devices

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

Technological leadership - achieving by 2030 a high level of technological sovereignty in the field of medical technologies, production of medicines and medical devices

• Medical Science Administration • Medical Development Technologies.

Biomedical and cognitive technologies of the future

• Regenerative Biomedicine, Preventive Medicine Technologies,

Ensuring active and healthy longevity

• Development of the production of the most demanded medicines

Medicines and Medical Devices

40

NATIONAL PROJECT "NEW HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES"

Key activities of the national project

• Implemented for medical care

• Selected and implemented in clinical practice cell

medical products developed under the federal project.

products, tissue engineering products, methods and technologies of regenerative medicine.

• Development and clinical trials of new

• Provided with raw materials and components of Russian production

medical devices for registration.

medical products and medicines.

• Equipped (reequipped) clinical bases for

• Medical devices and

development of new medical technologies, clinical trials of drugs and clinical trials of medical devices.

medicines from the list of vital and essential medicines on the territory of the Russian Federation

41

NATIONAL PROJECT "NEW HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Share of medical devices of Russian production

• Proportion of all studies carried out under national

in the total market volume - 40 %.

• Industry gross value added growth rate

Medically, 70 %.

• Proportion of radiopharmaceuticals

production of which is carried out in the Russian Federation - 95 %.

• The share of medicines on the list of strategically important medicines for medical use, the production of which is carried out in the Russian Federation on a full cycle, including the synthesis of a pharmaceutical substance - 80 %.

• The achieved level of technological independence is 80 %.

The project ended with the successful development and implementation of new drugs, medical devices, biomedical cellular products (BMCP), tissue engineering products and medical technologies - 50 %.

• The level of growth of funds received as a result of the commercialization of intellectual property rights (IPRs) created by public institutions in the interests of health, relative to the level of the base value (level of 2023 St Petersburg.) – 30 %.

42

NATIONAL PROJECT "FREE AVIATION SYSTEMS"

Acting Deputy Prime Minister: B. Mr. Savelyev Responsible FOIV: Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia Project Manager: A. A. Alikhanov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Ensuring technological independence and the formation of new markets in such areas as unmanned aircraft systems

Technological leadership

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Infrastructure, security and certification • Advanced technologies for BAS • Personnel for BAS

• Stimulation of demand for domestic BAS • Development, standardization and serial production of BAS

and components

43

NATIONAL PROJECT "FREE AVIATION SYSTEMS"

Key activities of the national project

• Specialized certification system formed

• Highly qualified personnel in the field of

unmanned aircraft systems.

• Serial production of unmanned

Aviation systems.

• The infrastructure necessary for operation has been created

unmanned aircraft systems.

development, production and operation of unmanned aircraft systems.

• Integrated incentive system

domestic unmanned aircraft systems and services provided with the use of unmanned aircraft systems

• Research and development

Design work to ensure the technological independence and global competitiveness of Russian unmanned aerial systems in 9 technological areas

44

NATIONAL PROJECT "FREE AVIATION SYSTEMS"

Key indicators of the national project 2030 the Year • Share of domestic UAVs in the total volume of the Russian UAV market, including aircraft, helicopters, multi-rotors – 70,3 %.

• The size of the Russian UAS market, excluding educational UAS and including aeroplanes, helicopters and multirotors (taking demand for services into account), in 2030 — 46 230 units.

• The number of subjects of the Russian Federation equipped with the infrastructure of the SPC in accordance with the methodological support of the ANO "Federal Center BAS" - 48 units.

• Achieved level of technological independence

industry BAS - 81,1 %.

• Number of certified unmanned aerial vehicles

systems - 26 units.

• The number of additional professional programs in the field of UAS that have passed the examination and included in the digital register of UAS personnel (accruing) is 250 units.

• The share of specialists in the development, production and operation of UAS in the digital register of UAS personnel employed in organizations in the field is 75 %.

• Air access time

space for equipped unmanned aircraft - 2 hours.

• Number of new Russian solutions for security

integration of unmanned aircraft into a single airspace - 5 units.

45

NATIONAL PROJECT "NEW ATOMIC AND ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES"

Acting Deputy Prime Minister: A. B. Novak Responsible FOVI: Ministry of Energy of Russia Project Manager: S. E. Tsivilev

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Providing world leadership in nuclear technologies, technological sovereignty in new energy technologies

• Technological leadership

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• New nuclear energy • Experimental stand-by base for development of technologies of two-component nuclear energy

• Thermonuclear power technologies • Special materials and nuclear power technologies • Serial reference of nuclear power plants large

• New technologies and production of lithium-ion and post-lithium

Energy Storage Systems

• New equipment and technologies in the electric power industry • New equipment and technologies in solar and wind generation • New equipment and technologies for liquefaction of natural gas • New equipment and technologies

and low power

the Oil and Gas Industry

46

NATIONAL PROJECT "NEW ATOMIC AND ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES"

Key activities of the national project

• Development of closed nuclear fuel technology

cycle and power units of large and medium capacity: ? commissioning of a pilot demonstration power unit with a reactor unit (RU) BREST-OD-300 with a lead coolant with an electrical capacity of 300 MW (by 2028 year).

• Technical re-equipment of complexes of additional plasma heating and engineering systems of the tokamak T-15 (T-15CBM), completion of the reconstruction of the TSP complex (phase 1) and test benches for electro-reactive engines and a powerful neutron source (stages 1 and 2) (C 2027 St Petersburg.). • Development of advanced materials for nuclear

Development of a module for processing spent nuclear energy

Industry by R&D.

Fast neutron reactor fuel with a capacity of 10 tons / g (by 2030 g).

• Development of technologies for low-power nuclear power plant (ASMM) based on the SHELF-M reactor facility (by 2026). • Construction of a research nuclear installation based on a universal multi-purpose fast neutron research reactor MBIR with the world's highest neutron flux density and unique reactor characteristics for fuel and materials justification (by 2028).

• Construction of new units of large and small power plants

(input 1 and 2 the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant2 C 2030 g. input 3 and 4 the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant2 C 2032 St Petersburg.).

• Creation of the All-Russian Test Center for complex research and testing for high-voltage electrical equipment of voltage classes up to 750 kV (by 2030).

• Creation of critical domestic equipment

and technologies for the fuel and energy complex.

47

NATIONAL PROJECT "NEW ATOMIC AND ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Number of countries of Russia's global presence in the international market of nuclear and related technologies - 75 units.

• The level of technological independence in the fuel and energy sector is 90 %.

• The share of domestic equipment in the fuel and energy complex is 90 %.

• Level of technological independence in the field of creation

• Production volume of domestic equipment in the fuel and energy complex

New nuclear technologies - 67 %.

– 2 719 billion rub.

48

NATIONAL PROJECT "NEW MATERIALS AND CHEMICALS"

Deputy Chairman of the Government: D. B. Manturov Responsible FOV: Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia Project Manager: A. A. Alikhanov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

Achieving technological independence, creating conditions for the formation of new markets and technological leadership in the sectors of production: chemical and biotechnological products, new and promising materials, rare and rare earth metals

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Technological leadership

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Development of production of chemical products • Import substitution of critical biotechnological products • Development of production of composite materials (composites)

And products from them.

• Development of rare and rare earth metals • Development of the most important high-tech technologies

on the direction of new materials and chemistry • Advanced training and retraining

qualified personnel in the direction of new materials and chemistry

49

NATIONAL PROJECT "NEW MATERIALS AND CHEMICALS"

Key activities of the national project

• Implemented 138 projects to create a priority

chemical products.

• Implemented 35 projects to create a priority

biotechnology products.

• The sites for pilot production and scaling of technologies with the provision of technological equipment for the production of products in the field of new materials and chemistry have been created and equipped.

• Value achieved

import-dependent commodity products of rare and rare earth metals with compensation to the manufacturer of discounts to consumers.

• Training of citizens on the developed or

Up-to-date additional professional programs in order to ensure the production activities of organizations in the field of new materials and chemistry.

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Achieved technological independence

• Production volume of new composite materials and products

for new materials and chemistry - 100 %.

- 25 939,78 million rubles.

• Proportion of chemical imports by consumption

• Proportion of imports by raw material and rare earth

– 30 %.

The volume of metals consumed is 48 %.

• Proportion of imports in critical biotechnology consumption

• Reduction of personnel deficit through federal measures

Products - 57,5 %.

The base year is 90 %.

50

NATIONAL PROJECT "INDUSTRIAL VEHICLE ENSURE"

Deputy Chairman of the Government: D. B. Manturov Responsible FOV: Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia Project Manager: A. A. Alikhanov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

The growth of production volumes of basic civil aircraft, ships and marine equipment, electric vehicles and corresponding shares of domestic products in consumption

Ensuring technological independence in the production of products that ensure transport mobility

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Manufacture of aircraft and helicopters • Manufacture of ships and ship equipment

• Production of innovative transport • Development of technologies and personnel support

51

NATIONAL PROJECT "INDUSTRIAL VEHICLE ENSURE"

Key activities of the national project

• Ensuring technological sovereignty of aviation

• Provision of electric vehicles, including

industry based on the developed new technical solutions.

serial hybrids, as well as the production of high-speed railway rolling stock.

• Creating conditions for achieving target volumes

• Ensuring the development and implementation of domestic technologies

Construction of water transport vessels.

also the influx of highly qualified personnel into the aviation, shipbuilding and innovative transport industries.

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• The level of technological sovereignty in the aircraft industry

• High-speed technological sovereignty level

– 50 %.

Railway rolling stock - 81 %.

• Level of technological sovereignty of shipbuilding

• The level of technological sovereignty of universal modular

The industry is 45 %.

platforms - 80 %.

52

NATIONAL PROJECT "CONDITION OF PRODUCTION AND AUTOMATION"

Deputy Chairman of the Government: D. B. Manturov Responsible FOV: Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia Project Manager: A. A. Alikhanov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Ensuring technological independence in the production of high-tech machines and increasing the level of industrial robotization

Technological leadership

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Development of machine tool production

• Development of foundry and thermal production

Industry

Equipment

• Development of industrial robotics and automation

• Science and human resources for the production of means of production

Production

and automation

53

NATIONAL PROJECT "CONDITION OF PRODUCTION AND AUTOMATION"

Key activities of the national project

• Production of new types of high-tech

• Production of new types of foundry and thermal

machines and components.

equipment.

• Conditions for the introduction of new technologies and inflow

• Industrial production projects implemented

personnel in the field of machine tools and robotization.

Robotics.

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• Ensuring the technological independence of the Russian Federation in the production of means of production - 95 %. • Increase in the volume of machine tool production

products for the needs of various industries of the Russian Federation in relation to 2022 the Year – 103 %. • Position of the Russian Federation in the rating by indicator

robot density - 25 place.

• Density of robotization – 145 ed. on 10 Thousands of people. • Percentage of graduates employed in the organization

Production of means of production and automation based on the results of training in the developed or updated basic educational programs of higher education in the interests of organizations of production of means of production and automation - 90 %.

• The level of professional qualification of organizations in the sphere of production of means of production and automation is 90 %.

54

NATIONAL PROJECT "TECHNOLOGICAL SAFETY"

Deputy Chairman of the Government: D. N. Patrushev Responsible FOIV: Ministry of Agriculture of Russia Project Manager: O. N. Lut

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Improving technological security of food security to create conditions for sustainable production growth

Technological leadership

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Veterinary preparations • Production of critical enzyme preparations, food and feed additives, technological aids

• Scientific developments in selection and genetics

• Personnel in AIC

• Technical and technological

Independence of agriculture, food and processing industries

55

NATIONAL PROJECT "TECHNOLOGICAL SAFETY"

Key activities of the national project

• Facilities for the production of critical enzyme preparations, food and feed additives, technological aids have been created and (or) modernized.

• Infrastructure facilities created and modernized

Manufacturers of medicines for veterinary use.

• Specialists are involved in the implementation of key projects in the field of agro-industrial complex through the provision of incentive payments.

• Modernized objects for attraction

skilled workers and mid-level specialists in the agro-industrial complex.

• Complex scientific and technical

• Built (acquired) housing to provide

specialists involved in the implementation of key projects in the field of agro-industrial complex, under the contract for the hiring of residential premises.

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

projects aimed at achieving the indicators of the subprogrammes of the Federal Scientific and Technical Program for the Development of Agriculture, with subsequent reimbursement of part of the costs.

• Agro-industrial technoparks (agrobiotechnoparks) were created). • Technical and technological independence is ensured

agriculture, food and processing industries.

• Conditions for the development of production of new types of equipment and

equipment, development of promising technologies.

• Agricultural production index

• Average crop yield index

the complex (in comparable prices) to the level of 2021 - 125 %.

for 5 years - 29 units.

• Achieved level of technological independence in the field of

• Agricultural animal productivity index

food security - 66,7 %.

average for 5 years - 140 units.

56

Project materials · Full published text

National Project Unmanned Systems

Source status: archive

The national project “Unmanned Systems” is the reference context of the direction.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/nats-proekt-bespilotnye-sistemy.html

Open on the site

NATIONAL PROJECT "FREE AVIATION SYSTEMS"

Acting Deputy Prime Minister: B. Mr. Savelyev Responsible FOIV: Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia Project Manager: A. A. Alikhanov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

Ensuring technological independence and the formation of new markets in such areas as unmanned aircraft systems

Technological leadership

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Infrastructure, security and certification • Advanced technologies for BAS • Personnel for BAS

• Stimulation of demand for domestic BAS • Development, standardization and serial production of BAS

and components

NATIONAL PROJECT "FREE AVIATION SYSTEMS"

Key activities of the national project

• Specialized certification system formed

• Highly qualified personnel in the field of

unmanned aircraft systems.

• Serial production of unmanned

Aviation systems.

• The infrastructure necessary for operation has been created

unmanned aircraft systems.

development, production and operation of unmanned aircraft systems.

• Integrated incentive system

domestic unmanned aircraft systems and services provided with the use of unmanned aircraft systems

• Research and development

Design work to ensure the technological independence and global competitiveness of Russian unmanned aerial systems in 9 technological areas

NATIONAL PROJECT "FREE AVIATION SYSTEMS"

Key indicators of the national project 2030 the Year • Share of domestic UAVs in the total volume of the Russian UAV market, including aircraft, helicopters, multi-rotors – 70,3 %.

• The size of the Russian UAS market, excluding educational UAS and including aeroplanes, helicopters and multirotors (taking demand for services into account), in 2030 — 46 230 units.

• The number of subjects of the Russian Federation equipped with the infrastructure of the SPC in accordance with the methodological support of the ANO "Federal Center BAS" - 48 units.

• Achieved level of technological independence

industry BAS - 81,1 %.

• Number of certified unmanned aerial vehicles

systems - 26 units.

• The number of additional professional programs in the field of UAS that have passed the examination and included in the digital register of UAS personnel (accruing) is 250 units.

• The share of specialists in the development, production and operation of UAS in the digital register of UAS personnel employed in organizations in the field is 75 %.

• Air access time

space for equipped unmanned aircraft - 2 hours.

• Number of new Russian solutions for security

integration of unmanned aircraft into a single airspace - 5 units.

Project materials · Full published text

National projects

Source status: archive

A review of national projects is a reference context for development programmes.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/natsionalnye-proekty-2.html

Open on the site

National projects

National projects are single-core instruments of achievement approved by the President of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the program of social and economic development up to 2030. They contain key decisions aimed at strengthening the country's economy, ensuring technological sovereignty and improving the lives of citizens

  • Presentation "National Projects of Russia"
  • General issues of implementation of national projects
  • National project "Youth and Children"
  • National project "Family"
  • National project "Personnel"
  • National project "Long and active life"
  • National project "Infrastructure for Life"
  • National project "Environmental well-being"
  • National project "Tourism and hospitality"
  • National project "Effective and competitive economy"
  • National project "International cooperation and export"
  • National project "Data Economy and Digital Transformation of the State"
  • National project "Effective transport system"
  • National project "New technologies of health saving"
  • National project "Unmanned aircraft systems"
  • National project "New nuclear and energy technologies"
  • National project "New materials and chemistry"
  • National project "Industrial provision of transport mobility"
  • National project "Means of production and automation"
  • National project "Technological support of food security"
  • Technological Support for the Bioeconomy national project
  • National project "Development of space activities"

Project materials · Full published text

National project

Source status: archive

The materials of the national project are a reference context.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/natsionalnyi-proekt.html

Open on the site

A national project that will help make traveling in Russia convenient, safe and interesting. Tourists will receive a service, and the organizers of recreation places and tourist routes will receive state support.

Curator of the national project: D.N. Chernyshenko is Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation.

Head of the national project: M.G. Reshetnikov - Minister of Economic Development of the Russian Federation.

The goal of the national project is to increase the role of the tourism industry in the country's economy and increase the number of tourist trips to 140 million by 2030.

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

  • The share of the tourism industry in the gross domestic product is 5 %.
  • Number of tourist trips in the territory of the Russian Federation - 140 million
  • Exports of tourism services – $10,75 billion

Key activities of the national project

  • Preferential lending for the construction of large hotels from 120 rooms and attractions for tourists (ski resorts, water parks, year-round amusement parks) – 59 thousands of new rooms and an increase in the number of visits to the created infrastructure for recreation and entertainment 23 Millions of people per year.
  • Creation of year-round seaside resorts - 11 projects in 9 subjects of the Russian Federation - more than 72 thousand new rooms and 80 thousand jobs.
  • Construction of modular non-capital accommodation facilities - 10 thousand new rooms.
  • A single subsidy to the subjects of the Russian Federation - holding events, improving historical centers of cities, arranging beaches and tourist routes, creating a non-capital berthing infrastructure will provide an increase in tourist trips by 7,4 million.
  • Development and maintenance of information systems aimed at the implementation of public services and functions in the tourism sector, the creation of a single digital platform, including 18 digital services, including the identification of at least 35 000 participants in the tourism services market.
  • Organization of a feedback system with all participants of the tourism industry. The index of satisfaction of citizens in the field of tourism and hospitality will reach 80 %.
  • Training of 89 regional teams on programs for the formation of a regional product for domestic tourism under additional professional programs
  • Education.
  • Training of 96 regional teams on the formation and promotion of the international tourist product to foreign markets.
  • Projects to increase labor productivity in 57 organizations in the tourism sector in the direction of "Lean production".
  • Development of educational and methodological complexes and training of personnel for the tourism and hospitality industry up to 53 thousand students.
  • A mechanism has been created to stimulate demand for domestic products for the tourism industry for the sale of 11,8 thousand domestic products for the tourism industry, including equipment for ski resorts, cable cars, as well as equipment for amusement parks and domestic tourist buses.

The state is trying to provide comprehensive support to the tourism industry. We will analyze how the national project "Tourism and the hospitality industry" in 2025 works, what programs it includes, what goals and plans are set within the national project, what support measures participants in the tourism sector can count on.

How does the national project "Tourism and hospitality industry" in 2025

The main objectives of the national project "Tourism and hospitality industry":

  • comprehensive development of the tourism business, as a result of which conditions will be created for affordable, comfortable and safe travel throughout Russia;
  • improving the quality of service and service at tourist sites;
  • increase in the number of tourist facilities and the number of jobs in the tourism sector;
  • Increased export of tourism services.

Initially, this project was designed for the period from 2021 to 2024, then it was extended to 2030. Since 2022, this national project has been carried out under the control of the Ministry of Economic Development.

It is assumed that as a result of measures to develop the tourism sector in Russia, the number of trips in the country by 2030 will increase to 140 million per year.

The project is also expected to have a significant financial impact - around 530 billion The federal budget and approximately 72 billion Rubles from regional budgets.

The national project "Tourism and Hospitality Industry" includes the following major projects:

  • "Development of tourism infrastructure";
  • "Enhancing the availability of tourism services";
  • "Improvement of tourism management".

Within each of these projects, various programs are implemented that have a narrower focus on solving specific problems and problems in the tourism sector.

Consider each of these projects, their features and plans for the implementation of the programs included in the projects in 2025.


What is a tourist product and how to implement it Tourist product is all the services and goods that a tourist company sells for travel. Tourist product is an important concept for the tourism industry, since it is implemented according to the rules approved by the Government of the Russian Federation. We will understand what types of services in practice are included in the tourist product, what are the rules for its sale, as well as how to create a tourist product and determine its cost. Learn more

Federal project "Development of tourist infrastructure"

The following programmes are being implemented under this project:

  • concessional lending - for the purpose of construction and / or reconstruction of service facilities (hotels, sanatoriums, multifunctional complexes, etc.);
  • subsidizing the activities of companies and entrepreneurs working in the tourism sector;
  • development of construction of additional (engineering and transport) infrastructure and master plans for tourist areas.

Each program has its own nuances.

Preferential lending for the construction and reconstruction of service facilities

This program is regulated by the Rules approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 09.02.2021 of 141.

A loan with preferential terms is issued for the purpose of construction or reconstruction, including with elements of restoration, of the following facilities: a hotel, a sanatorium or a major investment project in the field of tourism and recreation.

Conditions for issuing a loan for reconstruction of the hotel

To obtain such a loan in 2025, the service object must meet one of the requirements:

  • hotel (hotel) with a category of at least 3 stars, while its total area should be at least 5 thousand sq.m. or the number of rooms should be more than 120 rooms;
  • sanatorium, sanatorium and resort complex and (or) hotel, which is located in a multifunctional complex (MFC) and at the same time occupies at least 10 % from the area of such a complex. Additional requirements are set for hotels: category no less than 3 stars; if the area is less than 10 % from the area of the IFC - the availability of rooms more than 120 rooms. Such facilities, in addition to IFC, can be located in a sports and recreation complex, and (or) a congress center.
  • infrastructure ski resort with attendance of 450 thousand guests per year;
  • water park or amusement park, operating all year round - the number of visitors to such objects should be at least 1 million per year.

If a loan is issued for the construction of a ski resort with attendance from 450 thousand per year or a year-round park, then the necessary attendance indicators should be achieved no later than 2 years after the start of their operation (commissioning).

Minimum amount of credit - 100 million rubles; the maximum size - 70 billion rub.

The maximum loan term is up to 15 years.

The rate on loans issued in 2024- 2025 - from 3 to 7 % per year, the rate depends on the change in the refinancing rate.

Additional requirements for the borrower: the presence of a business plan and the rights to land for construction registered in Rosreestr.

The procedure for issuing a loan for the reconstruction of the hotel

A potential borrower submits an application and a set of documents to one of the banks that are authorized to issue such loans.

The Bank pre-approved the application and transmits the documents of the borrower for consideration to the Ministry of Economic Development and the special commission on tourism. The advantage is given

  • investment projects that are supposed to be implemented in new regions or in special economic zones of tourist and recreational type;
  • potential borrowers, in whose authorized capital there is a contribution from JSC "Corporation Tourism.RF".

After approval of the application of the Ministry of Economic Development, the bank concludes a loan agreement with the borrower.

The received credit funds cannot be spent on:

  • payment of lease payments;
  • repayment of debt on other loans of the borrower;
  • payment of dividends;
  • payment of taxes, fees or duties that are not directly related and are not included in the cost of the investment project;
  • placement at interest (in deposits or other financial instruments).

Total funds allocated to this programme 10 years - about 100 billion rub.

Subsidizing companies and entrepreneurs in the tourism sector

This program is one of the activities that are implemented within the framework of the State Program of the Russian Federation "Tourism Development" (approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 24.12.2021 N 2439). The program is aimed at providing financial support to tourism infrastructure through the allocation of subsidies and grants to entrepreneurs.

Previously, grants were issued under this program for the development of domestic tourism, the construction of modular accommodation facilities or the arrangement of beaches in small settlements. Since 2023, support in certain areas (projects for the development of domestic tourism and the construction of modular non-capital accommodation facilities - campsites and motor campsites) has been discontinued.

How to get a grant for agro-tourism in 2025 The grant of agro-tourism is the money that the state provides to the agricultural producer for the development of rural tourism. What you need to know to receive a grant, what documents to prepare and how long to meet further in the article. Learn more

Now, instead of subsidies in certain areas, the government gives the regions a single subsidy for tourism, from which the government of the subject of the Russian Federation distributes funds to the most priority areas for the development of this region.

For example, subsidies can be used for events (cultural, sports and gastronomic), the arrangement of national tourist routes, beaches, berths, campsites (autocamping), the design of tourist code of city centers, etc.

But not all regions can count on such a support measure, but only those where there is a high tourist potential.

V 2022 These funds have been allocated approximately 4 billion in 19 Regions of Russia.

V 2023 and 2024 C.A. has been allocated for this purpose in 2,5 More money (about 10 billion The number of regions receiving subsidies has been increased to 58.

The purpose of subsidizing private business 2025

Since 2025, subsidies have been granted to private businesses and investors only for modular hotel projects.

Such hotels, due to the short construction time and quick commissioning, help to improve the conditions for accommodation of tourists and guests. The subsidy covers no more than half of the costs provided for the investment project (at the rate of about 1,5 million rubles per one number).

Funds from the federal subsidy to the region are distributed between organizations and entrepreneurs who have applied for participation in the competitive selection in this direction.

At the end of 2024 The Ministry of Economic Development announced a competitive selection of projects for the construction of modular hotels for the period from 2025 to 2027, which will be held in about 85 regions of the Russian Federation.

In the selection, priority will be given to new regions and special economic zones for tourist purposes. Additional points will also be given to regions that did not receive subsidies in 2023-2024, or on the territory of which national tourist routes take place.

A new additional requirement for land - they must meet the purpose of subsidizing, i.e., among the types of permitted use of land should be such as the placement of tourist facilities and providing tourists with accommodation for temporary residence (including modular hotels).

As a rule, such authorized use is the land of settlements or forest fund. It is impossible to conduct tourism activities, for example, on industrial lands and agricultural lands.

Tourism Infrastructure Development and Construction Program

Thanks to this program, various engineering and transport infrastructure facilities are being created and actively updated in many regions of the country to ensure the activities of the tourism sector.

For example, under the program, subsidies are allocated for the construction of the following facilities: roads, water supply and sewerage networks, heating networks, gas and energy networks.

V 2023 and 2024 The program was allocated to 10 billion rub. V 2025 The program continues to work and receive support from the state.

For the implementation of tourist facilities in the framework of the national project "Tourism and the hospitality industry" and this program was created Joint Stock Company "Corporation Tourism.RF". The tasks of the corporation include the following:

  • formation of tourist clusters of the country, construction of providing infrastructure to them;
  • development and implementation of master plans of tourist areas;
  • investment in the creation of infrastructure of tourist areas on the principles of public-private partnership.

Information on the activities of the corporation is posted on the official website: https://туризм.рф/

There is also a section that tells about tourism projects implemented with the help of JSC "Corporation Tourism.RF" and investors.

Federal project "Improving the availability of tourism products"

This project has developed many programs that are aimed at stimulating demand for domestic travel; exempting tour operators from certain types of contributions and taxes, in order to provide additional financial support from the state.

Not all programs were successful, many were closed after 2-3 years from the beginning of their launch, because they did not show the desired result.

I will tell you about some of these programs that show the result and the application of which continues in 2025.

National tourist routes

Among the many tasks of the National Project "Tourism and Hospitality Industry" not the last place is occupied by the task of developing a system of national tourist routes.

What route can be added to the number of national tourists

Special programs are developed for such routes, which must meet the criteria approved by the Government to obtain the status of “national”. For example, the route should include at least one object of federal or international importance, and the route should be available to tourists all year round.

Project materials · Full published text

Dagestan District Development Program

Source status: Project

Dagestan district development programme — project materials for the territorial area.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/programma-razvitiya-raiona-dagestana.html

Open on the site

OXfV,sL Tl^o^f

R E S P U B L I C A D A G E S T A G L A A M N I C P A L N O G R A J O N A " T A A A A R A N S I J R A Y O N "

DECISION

№ J30^

On the forecast of socio-economic development of the municipal district "Tabasara district" of the Republic of Dagestan for 2023 and for the planning period up to 2025

In order to maintain the positive dynamics of economic growth, to achieve the projected indicators of socio-economic development of the municipal district "Tabasaransky district", the administration of the municipal district decides:

1. Approve

development of the municipal district "Tabasara district" of the Republic of Dagestan for the year 2023 and for the planning period until 2025".

socio-economic

"Forecast

M.S. Kurbanov

ADMINISTRATION to the forecast of socio-economic development of the MR "Tabasaran district" of the Republic of Dagestan for 2023 and for the planning period up to 2025.

1. Explanatory note to the forecast of socio-economic development of the MR "Tabasara district" of the Republic of Dagestan for 2023 and for the planning period up to 2025. 1.1. General assessment of the socio-economic situation of MR "Tabasara district" in

Republic of Dagestan for the reporting period (2021 year).

1.2. The main trends of socio-economic development of the MP "Tabasaransky

the Republic of Dagestan 10 months 2022 years.

1.3. Forecast of socio-economic development of the MP "Tabasara district"

Republic of Dagestan for the year 2023 and for the planning period up to 2025.

1.4. List of major issues of concern, constraining social

economic development of the municipal district "Tabasara district"

1-40

1-14

14-25

25-34 34-40

2. Table material: 2.1. "The pace of the main socio-economic indicators of the district for 2020"

1-14 1-1

2021 (Annex No. 1)

2.2.

Main

development of the municipal district "Tabasara district", according to the forecasted estimate for the year 2022. (Appendix No. 2)

socio-economic

indicators

2-3

Main

district "Tabasara district" in 2020-2025 (increase/decrease, % to the previous year) (annex No. 3)

Municipal Economics

indicators

Development

2.3. The main indicators of the socio-economic development of M R "Tabasaran district" 2023 Year and planning period 2024 and 2025 Years (Annex No4)

4-5

2.4. Indicators of socio-economic development M R

Tabasaransky

6-6

district " for 10 months 2021-2022 years (Annex No. 5)

2.5. Comparison of the dynamics of the main indicators of socio-economic development of the Tabasaransky district in 2020-2021 with the Republican (Table No 1)

7-7

2.6. the M Unicorn Roads 2021 Table No 2) 2.7. Register of investment projects implemented in Tabasaran district

8-8 9-9

as of 01.11.2022 (Table No. 3)

2.8. The program "Formation of the modern urban environment" for 2022 years

10-11

M R "Tabasaransky district" (Table No. 4)

2.9. Priority project-"Local initiatives" by M R "Tabasaransky

District " on 2022 (Table No 5)

2.10. M Unidipalnaya

medium-sized enterprises in the municipal district "Tabasara district" for 2022-2024 years.

Development of small

programme

and

12-12

Projected amount of funds for the implementation of the Program (Table No. 6) Target indicators of the municipal program

"Development and support of small and medium-sized businesses in Tabasaran district of the Republic of Dagestan" for 2022 - 2024 (Table No. 7)

2.11. M Unidipalnaya

Tabasaran district programme for the years 2022-2024".

"Development

Handheld

Carpeted

the University of London

13-13

Projected amount of funds for the implementation of the Program "Development of manual

2

Carpet production in Tabasaran district for the years 2022-2024" (Table No. 8)

2.12. "M Unilateral Program for Tourism Development for 2021-2024" Projected amount of funds for the implementation of the Program (Table No. 9) Target indicators for achieving goals and solving tasks, the main expected final results of the municipal Program (Table No. 10)

14-14

2.13. List of projects under the program "Formation of a comfortable urban environment in the Republic of Dagestan", planned for the municipal district "Tabasaransky district" for the year 2023 (Table No. 11)

15-15

2.14. _Information on the work done on the Republican Road

16-16

fund (transp. tax (subsidy)) for 2022 (Table No 12)

2.15. M Unilateral road fund for 2022 (Table No. 13)

17-18

M Unilateral road fund (excises). The only supplier for 2022 (Table No 13a)

2.16. Tourist infrastructure facilities in Tabasaran district,

19-19

under construction. (Table No. 14)

2.17. the Republican Investment Program of the Republic of Dagestan

20-20

2022 and for the planning period 2023 and 2024 (Appendix No. 6)

1.

Explanatory memorandum

to the forecast of socio-economic development of the municipal district "Tabasara district" for 2023 and the planning period up to 2025

Forecast of socio-economic development of the municipal district "Tabasara district" 2023 Year and planning period 2024 and 2025 The forecast is developed on the basis of instructional information of the Ministry of Economy and Territorial Development of the Republic of Dagestan for the development of a forecast of socio-economic development of municipalities for the period up to 2025 the main macroeconomic indicators of the Forecast of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan for long-term tasks, priorities and benchmarks, the period up to 2035 Message of the President of the Russian Federation V.V. the Federal Assembly of Putin 21 April 2021, the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 7 May 2018 № 204 On National Goals and Strategic Objectives of the Development of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2024 Year", the Unified Plan for the Achievement of the National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2024 Year and Planning Period 2030 the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 21.07.2020 City No 474 National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2030 Strategy of social and economic development of the Republic of Dagestan for the period up to 2030 years.

year, based on

In the development of the basic parameters of the area forecast for 2023 Year and planning period before 2025 The analysis of the socio-economic development of the district for the previous years, the results of the development of the district for the 2021 Year and for 10 months 2022 year, and the forecast indicators are set for the accelerated socio-economic development of the municipal district "Tabasara district" until the end of this year and in the medium term.

1.1. General characteristics of the socio-economic situation in the municipal district "Tabasara district"

during the reporting period (2021 year)

The municipal district "Tabasaransky district" is located in the plain, foothill and mountain zones of the Republic of Dagestan and borders: in the west - with the MO "Agulsky district", in the north - with the MO "Kaitagsky district", in the east - with the MO "Derbent district", in the south - with the MO "Suleiman-Stalsky district", in the south-west - with the MOHiv.

Territory - 803,1 sq. km, which is 1,6 % of the total territory

Republics.

Population - 64 976 According to the National Census, according to 01.10.2021 St Petersburg. 52 389 cel. (1,6 % of the total population of the Republic 01.01.2022 St Petersburg.).

The municipal area is relatively

high population density - 65,2 people/km2, (average in the republic - 62,7 people/km2, rural population - 34,3 people/km2).

the district is many times higher than the average republican level and is 92,1 units / 1000 sq. km (32,2 units / 1000 sq. km in the republic average)

the Municipal Territory

Density

Settlements

National structure of the population: Tabasarans - 79,06 %; Azerbaijanis - 18,4 %; others - 2,54 %. 22 rural areas were formed in the municipal district

municipalities, including 74 settlements.

Large population centers with populations above 2 Thousands of people: p. Hoochni (district center) - 3795 person, or 7,2 % of the total population of the region; c. Sirtych 3871 People; p. Darwag 2891 People; p. Hurik - 2849 i) Population with less than 100 person: p. Yurgunyag 65 cel.;

The municipal district "Tabasara district" has a relatively favorable transport and geographical position in relation to the Caspian coast, as well as to the republican center - the city. Makhachkala (distance to the republican center - 181 km) and to most areas of the republic, as it has convenient road access to transport communications passing along the coast of the Caspian Sea and to the city. Derbent (distance to mr. Derbent - 51 km), Daghestan Lights, Mr. Izberbash. Area

political and geographical location, as it also has convenient transport exits of the railway station - 51 km (city of Moscow). Derbent).

with Azerbaijan.

is characterized

concerning

Distance

Beneficial

Border

to

C

Transport links with other regions of the republic, as well as with other territories

Mainly

Implemented

the City Council

regions of Russia Derbent region.

The modern network of roads of the district, providing its external connections, includes roads of republican and inter-municipal significance. There are no federal highways in the city. The total length of public roads within the district is 792,6 km.

The transport network in the area is automobile. In recent years, as part of the implementation of the republican investment project "My Dagestan - My Roads", roads with a new asphalt coating are being built,

connecting the district with republican highways, intra-rural and inter-settlement roads.

The area is forested and forests perform mainly nature-protective functions. The total area of agricultural land of the district is 34,1 thousand hectares, of which agricultural land - 31,8 thousand hectares.

In the structure of agricultural land, the share of pastures is 17,4 thousand ha (54,7 %) Senokos 3,989 thousand ha (12,5%), arable land - 6,9 thousand ha (21,8 %), Many years of planting - 3,517 thousand ha (11%).

At

existing

agricultural specialization of the district economy, the factor of land resources involvement in turnover, relative to previous years, average.

Mainly

There is a lack of mineral resources in the area, and the

exploration work in the area is carried out inefficiently. construction of all

By conditions

The area is not particularly

favorable, characterized by difficult and especially difficult conditions.

With sufficient water resources, there is a trend of lack of drinking water in the area, the water supply of the population is only 60-65%.

By natural indicators

the territory of the municipal district "Tabasara district" is quite attractive for the development of recreation and tourism.

In recent years, in the framework of investment projects in the territory of

The region is developing infrastructure to attract tourists:

- at the modern level, a site on the territory of the fortress "Seven brothers and one sister", where various events of a mass nature are held;

- transformed and improved the territory of "Waterfall" with the organization

Parking for visitors;

- Hotel and restaurant complexes are built, cafes are opened and

steam;

In the municipal area, there is an unfavorable situation in the labor market, due to an excess of labor and an acute shortage of jobs. There is a large migration process in the area. The structure of employment of the population, namely a high proportion of employed in the social sphere, indicates a high degree of load on the municipal budget of the district.

The environmental situation in the municipal district is generally favorable, in the presence of certain problems of environmental protection (landslide processes, problems with the circulation of solid waste and the creation of animal burial grounds, wastewater treatment plants in water supply and sewage).

The settlements of the district are provided with gas at 100 %.

Over the years, the energy supply remains a major problem. Electricity supply in the area remains unsatisfactory. It should be noted that for the development of production, business, a developed sustainable energy supply system is necessary. Power lines in the district were built in 1960. There is a big problem with low voltage. In many settlements, the voltage sometimes reaches 120 - 140 Volts.

Transformer substations and power lines 10-6-0,4 sq. not always

Provide a high-quality supply of electricity to consumers.

Access to the nearest service facilities for most settlements is above standard. The MFC is located in the district center, where residents of settlements can get far.

The level of development of communication in the area can be considered normal, including the level of development and use of modern means of communication (non-stationary (mobile) telephone, satellite communication and fiber-optic communication lines).

In the region, industrial enterprises and valuable art crafts have been lost, the restoration of which has recently been directed by the efforts of the district leadership.

A low share of industry in the structure of the district leads to a low level of the tax base and the district continues to be highly subsidized.

The existing settlement system is quite complete. System

socio-cultural area,

the network of the municipal socio-cultural level of provision with certain types of services. In terms of the provision of social infrastructure facilities, there are facilities in the area that are located in non-standard, dilapidated and emergency rooms.

characterized sufficiently.

Services

concerning

The institutions,

developed

Medium

The development of small and medium-sized businesses in the municipal Tabasaran district allows you to create new jobs, increase budget revenues at the expense of tax revenues, increase incomes of the population through independent economic activity.

As part of investment projects and programs, great efforts have been made by the district management, and as a result of the implementation of projects, many socio-cultural institutions have been built and updated.

security

objects

Latest

the City

V

According to the level of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan, the district is included in the group with an average level of development. In the rating of districts of the Republic of Dagestan in many socio-economic indicators

municipal district "Tabasara district" occupies advanced and middle positions.

The region has maintained a positive dynamics of development and is gaining

stability and sustainability.

According to the achieved indicators, the region has: - 1,6 % production of agricultural products in the Republic

Dagestan;

- 0,1% housing construction; - 0,3 % the amount of investment in fixed assets 0,4 % retail trade turnover 0,3 % The amount of paid services to the population. As in recent years, there has been an increase in the

The majority of economic indicators (Table No. 1).

The pace of key indicators of socio-economic development

For the year 2021 to the fact 2020 were:

- in terms of shipped goods of own production - 113,4 %; - for agricultural products - 104,4 %; - for investments in fixed assets - 134,4 %; - for completed works on the type of activity "construction" -

149,1 %;

- for retail trade turnover - 100,5 %; - for the volume of paid services to the population - 101,9 %; - for tax and non-tax revenues to the consolidated budget -

103,5 %.

Comparison

Social and economic development of the municipal district "Tabasaransky district" for 2020-2021 years in comparison with the republican is shown in table No 1.

indicators

Dynamics

Main

Speed

Comparison of the dynamics of the rates of the main indicators of socio-economic development of the Tabasaransky district in 2020-2021 with the Republican.

Table No. 1

Indicators

Volume of goods shipped, works performed and services Agricultural products Investments in fixed assets Construction

Introduction of residential buildings

RD 104,5

101,4

113,6

99,6

95,2

2020

SKFO

district 111,2

RD 112,1

2021g.

SKFO

105,2

102,8

74,2

83,8 83,8

88,6

102,0

106,3

district 113,4

104,4

134,4

149,1 114,4

Retail turnover Real disposable income of the population

Number of officially registered unemployed (thousands) %

94,4

96,8

in 5,2times

101,5

101,0

104,3

100,4

2,801 or 9 times

3 4 IL and in 3,12 time

100,5

111,4

91,21

Average monthly wage for 1 employees for 2021 years increased by

Number

13,7 % and amounted to 24644,9 rubles., (in 2020 - 21673,3 rubles.).

The year has decreased and is 2555 The man who in 9 % less than in 2020 the Year (2020 Mr. - 2801 cel.).

Registered

Citizens

the National Park

In 2021 the implementation of priority projects continued in the region

Development of the Republic of Dagestan.

Key

Industry

for the area

is

Agricultural

production.

V 2021 c. compared to 2020 The volume of agricultural production has increased and is 104,4% (2 billion 886 Millions of rubles and 2 billion 766 Millions of rubles respectively).

The total number of vineyards is 1465 hectares, including

fruiting 1167,8 ha.

V 2021 the Year of Gathering 14885 Tons of grapes (with yield 122 c/ha),

That is 925 tons more than in 2020 year (107 %).

According to the republican investment programs and projects adopted in the Republic of Dagestan, small and medium-sized businesses of the region for laying gardens and vineyards, for caring for them from the budgets of all levels in recent years received significant amounts of subsidies and grants, which was a good help for the development of agriculture in the region:

the National Park 2019 Year - 54 million. 182 thousand rubles; for 2020 Year - 43 million. 800 thousand rubles; for 2021 Year - 122 million. 426 thousand rubles; Total 3 More than a year 220 million. 408 thousand rubles. Investment platforms for further development of viticulture, for planting new vineyards, with a total area of 1494 ha and fixed under long-term lease agreements for investors:

1. "The Vineyard - 1" 2. LLC "Sadar" 3. Adago LLC 4. Adago LLC 5. SPC "Tsanaksky

- 240 ha of arable land (salt. Syrtych); - 605 ha of arable land (salt. Maraga); - 340 ha of arable land (salt. Maraga); - 148 hectares of arable land (salt. Heli-Pendzhik); - 300 ha of arable land (village). Canak).

On the territory of the district 15 investment projects are being implemented

Development of agriculture.

The amount of funds invested for the implementation of these investment projects was 122 million. 426 thousand rubles. The volume of produced and sold products for the reporting year - 2 billion 871 million rubles.

Agricultural output projected to increase by 2025

on 11,3 % (3 billion 168 million rubles.).

Small and medium-sized enterprises

It is necessary to note the contribution of small business in the development of the economy of the region. The region is home to 473 small and medium-sized businesses, of which 62 are small businesses and 411 are individual entrepreneurs. In order to create favorable conditions for the development of entrepreneurship in our district, a mechanism for the participation of small and medium-sized businesses in the implementation of municipal (for example, for repair work and provision of various services) is implemented annually.

In the year 2021, the working group carried out active work to reduce

Informal employment, which results in the plan:

-

reduction of informal employment in the region

The reporting year was 106,8 %.

To further increase the activity of the population in the development of small and medium-sized businesses, as well as taking into account the role of small and medium-sized businesses in creating jobs and receiving tax payments to the budgets, measures have been taken to reduce the tax rates on the Requested Tax (USN), the Unified Agricultural Tax (USR), the patent system by almost 50 % (for the duration of the pandemic).

the Tax System

Industry.

and

persons

individual

individual

The industry in the region is represented by a small enterprise for the production of building materials (LLC "Brick Factory" with. entrepreneurs, Sirtych), whose legal activities are the extraction of sawn stone (career), and the production of entrepreneurs, as well as plastic windows and doors. It should be noted that today there are business activities without state registration and tax registration, including several careers. In the course of the inventory carried out by the administration of the municipal district "Tabasara district", 14 quarries were identified, of which 6 quarries are idle, 1 quarries are suspended.

Executors

physical

Busy

Faces,

By court decision, the remaining 7 quarries are valid and are tax-accounted.

For the year 2021 LLC "Brick factory" p. Sirtych

products (brick) - in the amount of 17 million 336 thousand rubles.

Construction and repair of roads and construction

materials (asphalt, crushed stone) are:

-

JSC "Tabasaran CEP No 33", which for the reporting year

33 thousands. 675 tons of asphalt concrete in the amount of 110 million. 108 thousand rubles., and also performed works on repair and maintenance of roads in the amount of - 28 million. 480 thousand rubles.;

- NEMA LLC has completed construction and repair work

Roads and other works in the amount of - 187 million. 482 thousand rubles.;

- LLC UK "Bars" has performed repair work of roads for the sum

- 11 million. 882 thousand rubles.;

- LLC "MK" performed repair work of roads for the sum

- 4 million. 348 thousand rubles.;

Ismailov Rajab M Akhmarizaevich

Intra-rural roads for the sum - 3 million. 517 thousand rubles.;

- LLC "EURODOR SERVICE" has performed repairs of in-farm

roads for the amount of 880 thousand rubles.

The above-mentioned organizations and individual entrepreneurs achieved significant production growth in 2021 compared to previous years, which led to additional tax revenues at all levels of the budget, especially in the local budget of the district (the total amount of revenues to the local budget of the district from taxpayers of the USN, including those from the above-mentioned commercial organizations, amounted to more than 11 million 712 thousand rubles of taxes and fees).

Consolidated Area Budget

In 2021, we achieved good results in meeting the revenues of the consolidated budget of the region, despite the difficult working conditions due to the pandemic.

By the decision of the Assembly of Deputies of the district budget of the municipal district "Tabasara district" 2021 The year was approved in total 1 billion 546 million. 995 thousands. 120 rub.

Tax and non-tax revenues plan for the consolidated budget of the district 2021 a) Amount determined 160 million. 799 thousands. 300 RUB, executed in the amount 168 million. 228 thousand rubles, which is 104,6 % the Plan (or 7 million. 428 thousands. 700 more planned tasks). Compared to the same period last year, income was provided for 20 million.

859 thousand rubles. more (for 2020 year received 147 million 369 thousand rubles.) and the increase in relation to last year amounted to 114,2 %.

Implementation of the budget of rural settlements of the district on own income with an annual plan 13 898 Thousands of Rubles 14 467 Thousands of rubles, which is 104,1 % to the annual plan. In the annual plan - 145 million. 685 Thousands of rubles in the consolidated budget of the district for 2020 year received its own tax and non-tax revenues in the amount of - 147 million. 369 thousand rubles.

The tax plan is executed on - 101,2 %. Compared to last year, revenues were provided for 5 million 011 thousand rubles more, which is - 103,5%.

Implementation of the budget of rural settlements of the district on its own income, with an annual plan - 14,021 million rubles, amounted to 14,289 million rubles. The plan was executed on 101,9 %. Compared to last year, revenues were provided by 588 thousand rubles.

In 2021, the work of the working group on expanding the tax base continued in the region as a result of the updating of land plots and capital construction facilities.

At the same time, work is being carried out to establish the tax accounting of physical business activities without state registration, as well as to identify persons who have not legally entered into labor relations.

Executors

illegal

persons,

For 2021 year as a result of the activities additionally became on tax accounting 128 natural persons; additional employment with 245 individuals working for various agricultural contracts. All are additional to the district budget.

these activities

RIP, Investments

For 2021, some positive work was done in attracting investments to the region, the volume of which in fixed assets from all sources of financing amounted to 641 million 441 thousand rubles.

Municipal customers, the administration of the municipal district "Tabasara district" for 2021 the Year of the Entente 52 municipal contracts with contracting organizations for repair work on schools, construction of sports grounds and other works for a total amount of 83 911 Thousands of rubles (for 2021 Year concluded 52 Contract for the amount of - 73 470 thousand rubles).

Within the framework of the Republican investment program in 2021, financing was carried out, including for the preparation of design projects.

estimated documentation 11 objects for a total amount of 222 million 73 thousand rubles, including:

- 4 object of general education p. Hurick, p. Turuff, p. Nichras and

c. Juljag;

- 2 of the object of preschool education in p. Sirtych and s. Guvlig; - 4 water supply facility: - water supply with. The Wallet, p. Uluz, p. Karag, p. Schiele, p. Hapil, p. Tatil; - water supply with. Sirtych; - water supply with. Gyuhrag, p. Chulat; - water supply with. Hanag, p. Buchnag, p. Gumi; - 1 health facility - polyclinic p. Go on.

Project "100 Schools".

V 2021 the Project "100Schools are more involved 140 schools in the Republic of Dagestan that have passed the competitive selection, 4 Schools are the general educational institutions of Tabasaran district. According to the capital of the project repaired 34 Schools.

"100-schools"

2019-2021

District

years

the City Council

the National Park

The total cost of funds for the implementation of the republican project "100 the School District 2021 The year was - 9 million. 430 thousands of rubles, including from the Republican budget - 7 million. 292 thousand rubles; local budget - 578 thousand rubles; attracted extrabudgetary funds -1 million. 559 thousand rubles.

Local Initiatives Project

According to the project "Local initiatives" of municipalities of the Republic of Dagestan, which passed a competitive selection for a subsidy from the republican budget of the Republic of Dagestan in 2021, 4 projects were included in the district for a total amount of 17 million 788 thousand rubles. Projects successfully completed.

In the region, our region is also in first place in terms of the number of

Implemented projects.

Comfortable urban environment (K.G.S.)

the Government of the Republic of Dagestan 10.04.2019 City No 76 the State Program of the Republic of Dagestan "Formation of the Modern Urban Environment in the Republic of Dagestan" 2018-2022 years.

Under this program, for 2021 A year in the area was built 2 Squares for the total amount 2 million. 389 thousand rubles, including: p. Chulat - 1 million. 126 thousand rubles; p. M Araga 1 million. 263 thousand rubles.

Roads

the Republic of Dagestan

According to the program "Municipal roads of the Republic of Dagestan" from the budget (income of transport tax) in 2021 Year of work in the amount - 17 million. 534,9 thousand rubles, without surcharges. N Achinaya 2019 year, the amount of transport tax paid by citizens of our district is fully returned to the district budget in the form of subsidies for the repair of intra-settlement roads and for 2021 year received 17 million. 534,9 thousand rubles.

Grants

account

the National Park

Nr. p/p

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

M unidirectional roads for 2021

Table No. 2

Name of object

Estimated value

Contract price

Work was done on the amount, rub.

Length of km.

Repair of intra-rural roads JV "rural council "Khuchninsky". Repair of the road on Ildarova Street in c. Repair of intra-rural roads JV "Khuchninsky village council". Repair of the road on the street Hospital in s. Go on. Repair of intra-rural roads JV "village Council Hapil". Repair of the road. Central, p. Tatil. Repair of intra-rural roads JV "village Council Hapil". Repair of the road along the street Koltsevaya, p. Hapil. Repair of intra-rural roads JV "Maraginsky village council". Repair of the road on Dzhurdakskaya Street, p. Maraga. Repair of intra-rural roads JV "Maraginsky village council".

Repair of the automobile road on G Elibatanskaya Street, p. Gelinbatan. Repair of rural roads. Repair of the road in c. Dagny.

2 136,690

2 136,690

2 136,690

0,53

2 552,640

2484,994

2484,994

0,93

2 765,980

2765,980

2765,980

0,70

1 033,730

1 033,730

1 033,730

0,26

1 435,240

1 435,240

1 435,240

0,36

1 270,220

1 270,220

1 270,220

0,32

3 958,660

3 958,660

3 958,660

1,00

8.

Repair of intra-rural roads of JV Kurkaksky village council. Repair of the Sika-Vartatil road.

2 454,570

2 454,570

2 454,570

2,50

TOTAL

17 607,73

17 534,9

17 534,9

6,6

At the expense of the municipal road fund (excise) for 2021, local roads were provided and repaired for a total amount of 23 million 370 thousand rubles.

Construction of a road on the Mammadkala - Khuchni section has begun 16-28 km, with estimated cost 440 million rubles, with a deadline for completion in 2022 year. For 2021 Year Built 4 km of road for the amount of about - 160 million rubles. Construction of the rest of the road continues.

For 2021 Totally at the expense of federal, republican and local funds for road repairs 364 million. 576 thousand rubles, and repaired 43,16 km of roads.

As part of the implementation of the Federal project "Modern School" of the national project "Education" in 2021 year 16 schools opened the Center for Education of Digital and Humanitarian Profile "Point of Growth", which additionally created 3 jobs. Modern digital equipment for children’s education has been delivered to each Center in the amount of 1 million 700 thousand rubles.

In the year 2021: 1.

V 2021 Year received 10 Vehicle units: MKAU

"Chulatskaya SOSH", MKOU "Pilgskaya SOSH", MKOU "Ilenskaya SOSH", MKOU "Kuryagskaya SOSH", MKOU "Gelinbatanskaya SOSH", MKOU "Akkinskaya SOSH", MKOU "Khuchninskaya SOSH No 2", MKOU "Zilskaya SOSH", MKOU "Gasik"

About tkry you additionally 1 group in the Akkinsky kindergarten "Cinderella" for 25 seats, at the expense of subventions from the budget of the Republic of Dagestan, where an additional 3 jobs were created.

In the 2019-2021 academic years, due to the opening of new groups in the gardens, the number of pre-school children covered

The number of children in active education increased by 350 children.

Health care

There are 63 health care facilities in the district.

including:

1 the District Hospital 170 Beds; 2 Hospitals in c. Yersi and p. Sirtych 15 The bed in each; 9 - medical outpatient clinics; 14 - paramedic - midwifery;

37 - paramedic stations. Total number of employees in the health care institutions of the region

- 775 people.

Under the program "Zemsky Doctor" young, promising doctors are attracted to the district; under this program, all 19 The doctors, for example 2021 Year of employment 1 Doctor - District Therapist UB c. Sirtych.

The following support services are deployed in the CRB: - X-ray cabinet with low-dose fluorographic and modern

X-ray equipment;

- modern mammography; - biochemical, clinical, bacteriological laboratories with everything

necessary equipment;

- Physio-therapeutic, massage rooms; - offices of fibrogastro- and colonoscopy; - 3 ultrasound diagnostic office in the main building of the CRB, in the district

polyclinic and for ultrasound of pregnant women in the maternity-gynecological department;

- 2 ECG cabinet; - CT functioning; Organized ultrasound - offices in UB c. Sirtych and s. Ersy. Significantly improved the material and technical base of the CRB thanks to

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Dagestan, district administration and TFOMS.

During the period from 2019 to 2021 CRBs were free of charge

received 9 vehicles, including:

For the year 2019:

1. Medical service van - 1 Units. 2. Emergency medical vehicles - 3 Units For 2020 year: 1. Mobile FAP. 2. Mobile Mammograph. 3. Mobile Fluorograph. 4. Lada Largus 2 Units. 5. Ouaz Patriot 1 Units.

For the year 2021:

1. Car Gazelle - 1 pcs. - for the amount of - 724 thousand rubles.; 2. Lada Largus All medical equipment received under the National Projects,

- 1 pcs. - for the amount - 1 million 401 thousand rubles.

installed and working.

Under the program "Modernization of primary health care in the Republic of Dagestan" 2021-2025 Years in 2021 the City of the District 5 Medical and Obstetric Units (FPAs) and 1 Doctoral

Outpatient clinic (VA) and 1 district hospital - totaling 104 million 13 thousand rubles including:

- p. Novo - Lidzhe 8 million. 715 thousand rubles 8 million. 715 thousand rubles; - p. Tsukhtyg 9 million. 737 thousand rubles; - p. Chulat - 8 million. 715 thousand rubles; - p. Gurhun 8 million. 715 thousand rubles; - p. Nichras 15 million.750 thousand rubles., Medical outpatient clinic (VA); - p. Maraga - p. Sirtych 43 million.670 thousand rubles. district hospital. V 2021 the Municipal Hospital

c. Ersi, the amount of the contract 7 million. 663 thousand rubles.

Also received funds for the equipment of the district hospital

c. Sirtych 4 million. 179 thousand rubles.

Total for the year 2021 the amount of contracts for the repair of the Central Bank amounted to

78 million. 176 thousand rubles (slide, photo)

Of the total number of health facilities, 4 facilities require

Major repairs.

Taking into account the construction of the FAPs and VA (medical outpatient clinics), the district hospital and the cars received on a free basis, the amount of investment in the health care of the district for 2021 is about 196 million 157 thousand rubles.

Under the program "Modernization of primary health care in the Republic of Dagestan" 2021-2025 Years in 57 settlements of the district and planned medical outpatient clinics in the amount of - 465 million. 665 thousand rubles.

Field - Obstetrics

Construction

Paragraphs

It is on the design of the construction of the clinic c. Khuchni for 150 visits per day at the expense of the republican budget of the Republic of Dagestan for a total amount of 234 million 869 thousand rubles - up to 2024 years.

In connection with the continuation of the coronavirus pandemic "COVID-19", the fight against

It continues.

To date, in order to develop collective immunity from

Coronavirus, other than vaccination, is not invented.

The total number of people eligible for vaccination in the region is 29 thousands. 181 People vaccinated more 25 Thousands of people, which is 86 %. 1.2. The main trends of socio-economic development of the municipal district "Tabasara district" 10 months 2022 years

Po

development of the municipal district "Tabasara district" for 10 months 2022 years

socio-economic

Forecaster

Evaluation

The positive dynamics of the pace of the main economic indicators (Table No. 1).

The pace of the main indicators of socio-economic development of the district for 10 months 2022 years to the corresponding period 2021 years were:

- by volume of shipped goods of own production -

151,1 % (including the production of brick and asphalt concrete); - for agricultural products - 104,9 %; - for investments in fixed assets - 138,8%; - for completed works on the type of activity "construction" -

104,4 %;

- on retail trade turnover - 100,2 %; - on the volume of paid services to the population - 100,3 %; - on tax and non-tax revenues of the consolidated

The budget is 115,6 %.

Annual targets for the year 2022 in the consolidated budget of the LL

"Tabasaran district" is set in the amount of 181 million 343 thousand rubles.

Implementation

the National Park 11 This year’s months have been 163 million. 438 thousand rubles. with the plan 166 million. 232 thousand rubles, which is 101,7% the Plan 11 months and 90,1 % from the annual.

Compared to the same period last year 11 months 2022b) Income is provided to 21 million. 133 thousand rubles more (for 11 Months. 2021Mr. has arrived 142 million. 305 thousand rubles) and the increase in relation to last year amounted to 114,9 %.

With regard to ensuring revenues directly to the budgets of the JV, the main priority of the heads of rural settlements, among many other tasks, is to ensure full receipt of property taxes from individuals (land tax, property tax and transport), as well as rent.

The SP Budgets 2022 G is planned for execution 14 million. 100 thousands.

Ruble of income.

Actual performance for 11 This year’s months have been 10 million. 496 thousands. 400 Rub, which is 81,2 % the Plan 11 months and 74,4% from the annual. During the same period last year, the budgets of the SP received 11 million. 897 thousands. 100 RUB, i.e. for 2021Mr. More has arrived 1million. 400 thousands. 700rub.

On this fact it should be noted that compared to the same period last year this year, the income rate is lower due to the fact that last year for 11 months.2021 there was a one-time income - more than 2 million rubles. land tax - from a legal entity (SUE "Tabasaran"), which are absent this year.

Transport tax On transport tax for 11 months of the current year, more than 14 million 181 thousand rubles were provided. During the same period last year, 10

million. 157thousand rubles, i.e. this year income is provided to 4 million.024 thousand rubles. more, the increase was 139 %.

In 2022

In the same year, work continued in the area to expand the taxable base: the updating of land plots and capital construction projects, the tax registration of individuals engaged in business activities illegally, as well as the identification of persons who have not legally registered labor relations, which will additionally replenish our budget.

As a result of the work of the working commission to reduce informal employment in the district for 10 months 2022 year plan to reduce informal employment of the population is fulfilled by 188,2 %, which is 2,8 times more than in the corresponding period last year.

For 10 months 2022 The annual plan to create jobs in the area is implemented at 101 %. As a result of the implementation of investment projects and programs and conditions for the development of tourism in the region, new jobs are created. So, with the opening of the Sirtych kindergarten 19 Jobs. Investment projects in agriculture have been established 52 workplaces.

The leading place in the production sector of the district is occupied by agriculture: viticulture, horticulture, livestock and cultivation of other crops.

Agricultural production in the region is carried out by 8 agricultural organizations, 32 operating farms and 10235 personal farms.

The volume of agricultural production in farms of all categories of the district was 2 billion 975 million. 417 thousand rubles, which is 104,9 % by the relevant period 2021 Year (for 10 months 2021 Year - 2 billion 834 million. 236 thousand rubles.).

In order to identify the rights holders,

as well as other characteristics of land plots, a planned, commission inventory of land on the territory of 7 has been started in the district:

The boundaries,

- with Chulat; - with.Knizhnik; - with.Khurik; - with.Tinit; - with. Burgankent; - p. Maraga; - p. Hapil. Agricultural technology is currently being developed.

work on soil preparation and sowing of winter cereals.

This year, the Republican plan of spring sowing

With an area of 2020 hectares, it is made on 100 %.

One of the most successful agricultural sectors in the

The area is viticulture.

The total area of vineyards in the area today is 1494 hectares, including fruit-bearing - 1407 hectares, of which using drip irrigation - 684 hectares. It is planned to lay vineyards on an area of 70 hectares.

V 2022 the Collection and Delivery of Grapes 19854 Tons of what 4969 Tons more than 2021 year. Among 25-those districts of RD engaged in the production of grapes, Tabasaran district occupied 4 place. The increase in the gross harvest of grapes was achieved by commissioning new areas of vineyards and improving the quality of care and watering for vineyards.

Despite the results achieved, viticulture in the region has even greater potential for the development of this industry. To do this, it is necessary to master suitable areas for grapes, which today amount to 1305 hectares. The development of these areas would increase the volume of grape production by another 14-16 thousand tons, but due to the lack of appropriate equipment, this problem has not yet been solved.

Gardening is also one of the priority areas for the development of agriculture in the region. The total area of the gardens in the area is 1273 hectares. Of the total area of gardens, more than 900 hectares have been in operation for more than 35 - 45 years. These gardens are poorly maintained, have high cutting, the harvest from these areas does not have the appropriate commercial quality and is suitable only for the production of juice. Due to the lack of processing plants in the area, the crop is exported outside the region and the Republic at a very low price.

Production

This year’s spring is set 16 Gardens, including, 5 ha intensive type (LLC "Dagfruit") and 13 of vineyards. At the moment, enterprises, KFH district, as well as personal subsidiary farms that received rural areas” in the amount of up to 500 thousand rubles for planting small intensive gardens.

Subsidies under the Mountain Development Programme

Multi-year planting

Autumn

Cultures

Within the framework of the state program of RD "Social and economic development of mountainous territories of RD" received 5 grants for planting intensive gardens, the amount of which is up to 500 thousand rubles.

Subsidies received for the purchase of small agricultural machinery

12 500 rubles - Kurbanov Uruzhbek Feizulaevich.

Within the framework of the republican project on the development of SPOK, a vegetable storage facility was built for the storage of grapes, vegetables and fruits on the territory of the JV MO "c / s Tinitskiy" SPOK "Zanak" 1000 Tons in total 82,0 million.

Growing

rupees, from which construction costs are subsidized within 60 %, the amount of - 49 million. 300 thousand rubles. closed

from the demanded areas of vegetable growing. The district currently has 1,35 hectares for growing vegetables of closed soil, which are mainly located in personal subsidiary farms of the population.

is

Vegetables

Soil

One

In 2022 year in the SEC "Loza" completed the construction of a greenhouse on an area of 2 hectares, in the amount of 100 million rubles, where tomatoes will be planted for harvest 2023 years.

The competition "Agrostart" was held and won in the livestock breeding line

Residents:

- p. Dubek - Bagirov Rajab Shabanovich; - Tinit - Isaev Isakhan Agalarovich; - p. Sirtych - Tagiyev Ayubkhan Samurkhanovich. The amount of grants is 2 million. 975 Thousands of rubles for each

Amount - 8 million.925 thousand rubles.

In terms of agriculture in 2022 The year in the area implemented 10 priority projects. They are in the process of completion 4 investment projects. The total investment in agriculture for the current period is about 44 million rubles, including investments under the Zanak SPC in the amount of -35 million rubles and KFH "Gyulov" in the amount of - 4,0 Millions of rubles, etc.

Register of investment projects implemented in Tabasaran district on 01.11.2022

Name of the Investment Project

Amount of investment, million rubles.

Level of readiness of the investment project

Total funds invested, million rubles

%

1 1.

2.

3. 4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

2 CF H "Gyulov. T"

K F Kh Kurbanov A."

KF H "K urbanov A" KF H "Gyulov. T"

KF H "K urbanov N."

KF H Agasiev G.

KF H M agomedov I.

JV OC "Zanak"

About NGO "Dagfruit"

10.

JSC "Dagfruit"

a in t d e r s

e e n e e c b o C

a in t d e r s

e e e e e e e e l e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e

5

ogess

3

4

90

35

7,5 26

7,7

21

12

80

2,3

3,2

45

18

3,0 14

4,1

9

4

30

0,6

1,3

45

17

4,5 12

3,6

12

8

50

1,7

1,9

a A L P

-

C N C and B

e and h and l a N

6

+

+

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

+

- +

D S P

e and h and l a N

7

+

+

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

+

N n n o n n n n n n n n n n c n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n

e and h and l a N

I and n a c and p o

e e e e e

and c c a c c e e l p

8 vineyards

and c a z l a e r

O L A H

) d o g , c i s e m

(

9

n a l p

, e and n s r e in a Z

D O G

,

I'm with M.

(

10

15.01.2018

30.10.22

vineyards

01.06.2017

30.10.22

int. garden 5 ha wines. 26 ha

12.01.19 15.02.18

10.2023 10.2022

Int.sad. 5 ha

20.03.19

10.2023

Vin-k 20ha

12 ha wine-to-wine storage

25.03.19

25.10.19

11.2023

11.2024

Autumn 2021

11. 2022

Int. Garden-5 ha

Autumn 2021

11, 2026

Int.sad-8 ha

Spring 2020

11.2024

.

l e h . t c e m

x and h o b a r

T A D O S

I am with t e y r and n a l P

11

55

21

3 10

3

5

3

7

1

2

the D E R S

x n n e t c b o s

.

t t t t

13

45

17,9

4,1 12,4

2,4

11,3

4,7

20

0,5

1,1

the D E R S

x e e e e e e l e r p

.

h. t B

14

43

17

3,4 13,3

5,6

8,4

5,4

50

1,5

2,1

: o g e s B

12

88

34,9

7,5 25,7

8,0

19,7

10,1

75

2,0

3,2

Table No. 3

Incl. invested in the reporting period (as of 1.07.2022year), mln. rub

A brief description of the work performed during the reporting period (as of 01.07.2022g), including an indication of the volume of products produced and jobs created.

the D E R S

x n n e t c b o s

.

t . t

Oges

SV V

the D E R S

x e e e e e e l e r p

.

t t t t

15

16

17

18

4,0

0,4

0,1 1,0

0,3

1,0

1,0

35

0,5

0,6

-

0,4

-

1,0

0,3

-

15

0,3

0,4

4,0

-

0,1 -

-

1,0

1,0

20

0,2

0,2

vineyards 90ga, created jobs - 4 vineyards 31ga, created jobs - 4

Inten.sad 5They created jobs- 2 Winog. 26 They created jobs-2 Garden Intensive 5They created jobs- 3 vineyards 20They created jobs-5 vineyards 12They created jobs-3

Grape-storage 1000 tn Slave places- 7 Intensive garden 5 They created jobs-1 Intensive garden 8 haha

Total

284,7

129

155,7

110

274,1

119,4

149,7

43,9

17,4

26,5

The development of agriculture in the region is the receipt of taxes to the budget, the creation of new jobs, the provision of the population with their own production and the improvement of the welfare of the people.

For many years, the issues of involvement of arable land in agricultural turnover rested in the need to provide the area with irrigation water and the lack of agricultural machinery.

539

10 months

Small and medium-sized businesses also contribute to the development of the region's economy. According to the results of the average activity, entrepreneurship is carried out, of which 62 small enterprises and 477 existing individual entrepreneurs, of which 45 % are engaged in wholesale and retail trade. During the reporting period, 146 individual entrepreneurs were put on tax accounting, for the corresponding period last year - 84 individual entrepreneurs. General

Subject of small

quantity

Busy

Medium

Small

persons,

and

and

the University of London

entrepreneurship, in our area is more than 1200 people.

In addition, 477 self-employed were registered during the reporting period

(total area 1001 self-employed persons).

Development

Bolshaya

the University of London

Economics

District

Plays

industry.

Mainly construction and repair of roads, as well as production (asphalt, concrete, rubble, brick) in the area

3 enterprises and 1 individual entrepreneurs are engaged in construction materials:

- LLC "Brick Factory" p. Sirtych, the turnover of which for the current period amounted to about 17 million rubles and produced 730.0 thousand pieces of bricks;

- JSC "Tabasaransky DEP No. 33", which during the reporting period performed work on the summer and winter maintenance of roads of republican and local significance in the amount of 14 million 184 thousand rubles;

- LLC "NEMA", which during this period has performed work for the amount of more than 67 million.410,0 thousand rubles. In addition, both organizations have spent about 5890 tons of asphalt concrete for more than 29 Millions of rubles;

Kurbanov Salman Hajikurbanovich - manufactured

concrete for more than 3,5 million rubles

These organizations, by achieving certain indicators of production growth, are the main payers of taxes and fees to the district budget among small and medium-sized businesses.

V 2022 The issues of attracting investment to the region are successfully resolved. The volume of investments in fixed assets from all sources of financing for the reporting period amounted to 543 million. 243 thousands of rubles, including: for the implementation of national projects - 159 million. 37 thousand rubles; according to the municipal road fund - 46 million. 495 thousand rubles; on the roads along the line of Dagavtodor - 111 million.791 thousand rubles; for the construction of private houses - 225 million. 920 thousand rubles. Of great importance in attracting investment in the area is the participation of our district in the implementation of projects and programs in the territory of which they are implemented 5 National Projects:

1. "Demography"; 2. "Education"; 3. "Housing and Urban Environment"; 4. "Culture"; 5. "Safe Quality Roads".

and 7 regional projects:

1. "Modernization of school education systems of the Republic of Dagestan"; 2. "Capital repair of preschool educational organizations"; 3. "Local Initiatives"; 4. "Formation of a comfortable urban environment"; 5. "Cultural environment"; 6. "Clean Water"; 7. "Road network". the Administration of the municipal district "Tabasara district" 10 months 2022 the Year of the prisoner 42 municipal contracts with contracting organizations for repair work on schools, improvement of territories, repair of roads and other works at the initial price of the contract (NCC) for the amount of - 262 million. 227 thousands.409 roubles.

During the current period, 5 regional

Projects and Programs for the Amount 159 million. 37 thousand rubles, including.:

1. According to the national project "Education", according to the regional project "Modernization of national education systems of the Republic of Dagestan", in the Tabasaran district 2022 Year included 6 Schools with Estimated Costs 68 million. 186 thousands.283 RUB, contracts are concluded for the amount of 64 million. 552 thousands.080 rub.

2. Regional project "To the capital and repair of preschool educational organizations" 2022 Year of 35-the total number of kindergartens in the Republic of Dagestan submitted documents, passed 2 Kindergarten from Tabasaran district for the amount of - 13 million. 2 thousands. 260 rub.

Contracts awarded in the amount of - 10 million. 579 thousands.153 rub.

3. The regional project “Local initiatives” is being implemented 3 the Project for the amount 22 million. 241 thousands. 111,0 rub. The funds of the patron are - 3 million. 675 thousand rubles. Contracts awarded in the amount of - 22 million.58 thousands.37 Ruble in particular.:

-

Capital

repair

the MBU Building

"Multifunctional

The Youth Center.” Amount of contract - 7 million. 271 thousands. 394 rub.;

- major renovation of the village house of culture c. Pilig. Amount

contract - 3 million 433 thousand 151 rubles;

- completion of major repairs of the building of ICAC "ICBS". Amount

contract - 11 million 353 thousand 491 rubles.

4. According to the national project "Fleet and urban environment", according to the regional program "Formation of a comfortable urban environment in the Republic of Dagestan" 2018-2022 years for 2022 A year in the area 3 (Project with estimated cost 4 million. 333 thousands.253 rub. Contracts awarded in the amount of - 3 million. 597thousands. 832 rub.:

- improvement of the square in s. Hapil. The amount of the contract is 950 thousand rubles; - improvement of the square in the village. Ersy. The contract amount is 1 million 616 thousand.

240 rub.;

- improvement of the square in s. Gyukhryag. The contract amount is 1 million 031 thousand.

592 rub.

Program "Formation of the modern urban environment" for the year 2022 in the municipal district "Tabasaransky district" Table No 4

Nr. p/p

1.

2.

3.

Name of object

CONTRACT

Funds management

Contractors

Percentage of development

Improvement of the square in s. Ersi Tabasaran district RD Improvement of the square in s. Gyukhryag Tabasaran district RD Improvement of the square in s. Khapil Tabasaran District of the Republic of Dagestan

1 616 240,70

1 616 240,70 "ISTOK" LLC

100

1 031 592,00

1 031 592,00

950 000,00

950 000,00

LLC "SYNERGY"

LLC "SYNERGY"

100

100

Total

3 597 832,70

3 597 832,70

Priority project "Local Initiatives" for the municipal district "Tabasara district" on 2022 Table No. 6

Sources of funding

Total

Municipal education and Name of the facility

Local budget

Extrabudgetary sources

Republican Budget

1 1. Major maintenance

2

2.

3.

Building of MBU "Multifunctional Youth Center" Tabasaran district of the Republic of Dagestan Major repair of rural house of culture Pilig Tabasaran District of the Republic of Dagestan Completion of major renovation of the building of the ISCAC "Inter-settlement Central Library System" of the Tabasaran District of the Republic of Dagestan

3

4

5

6

7 419 790,00

4 979 790,00

1 250 000,00

1 190 000,00

3 467 830,00

2 322 830,00

590 000,00

555 000,00

11 475 130,00

7 705 130,00

1 930 000,00

1 840 000,00

Total

22 362 750,00

15 007750,00 3 770 000,00

3 585 000,00

5.

National project "Culture", within the framework of the regional

the Cultural Environment Project 3 Project with estimated cost 41 million. 125 thousands. 225 rub. Contracts awarded in the amount of 35 million. 706 thousands. 116 rub.:

- "Capital repair of KFOR building in c. Harag." Contract Amount - 10

million 180 thousand 976 rubles;

- "Capital renovation of KFOR building in c. The amount of the contract -

19 million 80 thousand 497 rubles;

- Technical equipment of the museum. Amount of contract - 6 million. 494 thousands. 643

rub. Development of funds for these objects at the level of 80-90%.

The Municipal Road Fund of the District

The district road fund for the year 2022 consists of subsidies

(The transport tax and excise taxes shall be 46 million. 495 thousands. 575,51 rub.

As from 2019, the amount of the transport tax shall be refunded to

budget of the district in the form of subsidies for the repair of intra-settlement roads.

In the year 2022 under the Program "Municipal roads of the Republic of subsidies

Dagestan" from the budget of the Republic of Dagestan (transport tax) in the amount of 21 million 714 thousand 340 rubles.

selected

During the reporting period, concluded 11 Contracts for the amount of - 21 million.

714 thousand 340,0 rubles:

1. Repair of st. Ring in c. Hoochni; 2. Repair of the road in c. Arkit;

3. Major road repairs on the street. Osmanova in p. Hoochni; 4. Repair of roads on the street. New, Nut, Urzigskaya with organization

storm drain s.Urzig;

5. Repair of the public road Guvlig - Urzig; 6. Repair of the road on the street. Lenin to the New Kindergarten, p. Sirtic; 7. Repair of public road from Juljag - Harhni to

c. Churdaf;

8. Major road repairs on the street. Ring in c. Hapil; 9. Repair of the public road from Khuchni - Juljag to

c. Harhni - Gasik;

10. Major repairs of Dagny-Gukhrag road; 11. Repair of the road on the street. Hospital to 4 apartment buildings

c. Go on.

From the municipal road fund (excise 2022 The year was funded by 24 million. 781 thousands. 235 Rubles and Entries 23 Contract:

1. Repair of the road on the street. West of the street. Central 34 in c. Dubeck; 2. Repair of rural roads in c. Darwag; 3. Repair of the road on the street. Ring in c. Khuchni; 4. Repair of intra-rural roads in the Ministry of Defense of the JV "village council "Tinitsky"; 5. Repair of the access road to the MBU MFMC in c. Khuchni; 6. Repair of rural roads in the Ministry of Defense of the JV "rural council "Khurik"; 7. Repair of intra-rural roads in the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation "Yersinsky village council"; 8. Repair of rural roads in the Ministry of Defense of the JV "rural council" Turagsky "; 9. Repair of intra-rural roads in JV "Araksky village council"; 10.

Motorways of the Ministry of Defense

intra-rural

Repairs

"Selsovet

"Burgankent";

11. Repair of intra-rural roads JV "Village Council "Guminskiy"; 12. Repair of intra-rural roads of JV Selsovet Gurikskiy; 13. Repair of intra-rural roads of JV "Village Gyukhryag"; 14. Repair of intra-rural roads of JV "Selsovet "Kurkaksky"; 15. "Maraginskiy";

Motorways of the Ministry of Defense

intra-rural

Repairs

"Selsovet

16. Repair of intra-rural roads "village council "Khalagsky"; 17. Repair of the rural roads of JV "Selsovet Heli-

Penjik;

18. Repair of the rural road on the street. Rajabova in p. Hoochni; 19. Repair of the access road to the school in c. Hurik; 20. Construction of a retaining wall at the entrance to the Khuchninsky

waterfall;

21. Repair of intra-rural roads of JV "Choolat village";

22. Costs of design work and technical supervision; 23. To complete the pedestrian road to the school and repair the streets

c. Karag;

24.To repair the road on the street school in s. Gasik; 25. Construction of a bridge to the Afna-Tea river road, contract

Not yet locked.

According to the regional project "Road Network", according to the contract with the State Institution "Dagestanavtodor" in the district, four projects are being implemented for the amount of - 391 million. 791 thousands. 376 rub.:

1. Repair of Derbent-Khuchni-Hiv road at km 16 - km 18.

Amount of contract - 30 million. 435 thousands. 720 rub.;

2. Repair of the road Khuchni - Halag on the section of km 3 - km 10.

Amount of contract - 39 million. 851 thousands. 679 rub.;

3. Repair of the entrance to c. Yagdyg from Derbent - Khuchni - Hiv road at km 0 - km 3. Amount of contract - 41 million. 503 thousands. 977 rub. These objects are completed.

Also, a major role for the development of the district is played by the construction of the Mammadkala-Tatil highway, km 16 - km 28, worth more than 440 million rubles, which is planned to be completed this year.

The main indicators of socio-economic development of the municipal district "Tabasara district", according to the forecasted estimate for 2022

Indicators

Annex No. 2

2021 years

Report

2022 years

Forecast estimate

Economic growth of production sectors (% compared to the previous year)

own services

goods of work performed and

Gross regional product Volume of shipped production, own-account Agricultural products in all categories of farms Investments in fixed assets at the expense of all sources of financing Volume of work performed by type of activity

"Construction" Retail trade Volume of paid services to the population

(consolidated budget) - total

Finance

Income million rubles.

-

113,3

102,9

134,4

142,4

100,5 101,9

-

211,8

100,9

106,1

101,4

105,0 102,7

1552,638

1539,046

including tax and non-tax revenues,

168,228

169,685

Indicators

million rubles.

Real disposable income, % to the previous year Average monthly salary per employee, rub.

Nominally

Accrued

2021 years

Report

2022 years

Forecast estimate

111,4

107,9

21644,9

26813,7

Number of unemployed persons registered in state employment service institutions (at the end of the year), thousands of people.

Registered unemployment rate, %

2555

4,3

1670

3,5

1.3. The forecast of socio-economic development of the municipal district "Tabasara district" for 2023 and the planning period up to 2025.

Year of Development

The main indicators of the Forecast of socio-economic development of the municipal district "Tabasara district" 2023 Year and Schedule of the Meeting 2025 the Government of the Republic of Dagestan 12 October 2022 № 12.3 "On the forecast of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan 2023 year and for the planning period 2024 and 2025 Ministry of Economy and Territorial Development of the Republic of Dagestan to develop forecasts of the regions of the Republic of Dagestan for the medium term.

Extracts of the Protocol

According to

Macroeconomic parameters of the Forecast of the district are developed on the basis of the analysis of the socio-economic development of the district for the previous years, an assessment of the situation in the current year, trends in the external and internal conditions of the district development for the short and medium term, priorities for the future.

socio-economic

directions

Development

The main indicators of economic development of the Tabasaransky district in 2020-2025 (increase/decrease, % to the previous year)

Indicators

Report

Ratings - ca

Annex No. 3

Forecast (option 2)

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Indicators

Volume of shipped goods of own production, performed works and services by own forces

Agricultural products

Investments in fixed assets

Construction

Retail trade turnover

The volume of paid services to the population

Average monthly nominal wage per employee

Number of registered unemployed (at the end of the period) (thousands)

Report

Ratings - ca

Forecast (option 2)

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

11,2

5,2

-25,8

-16,2

1,5

4,0

13,3

4,3

34,4

42,4

0,5

1,9

111,76

4,2

6,1

6,3

5,0

2,7

7,3

2,8

7,0

6,5

5,2

2,9

8,1

3,3

7,9

6,7

5,5

3,5

13,25

3,9

9,0

7,0

6,0

4,3

2,9

13,7

8,8

9,6

10,8

12,3

2,8

2,6

1,6

1,6

1,5

1,4

M Unipartite program of development of small and medium

Entrepreneurship in the municipal area

Tabasaran district for the years 2022-2024

Total costs of the Program activities 2023 - 2024

The years are 19 million. 009,0 thousand rubles, including.:

- at the expense of the republican budget - 14 304,0 thousand rubles; - at the expense of the local budget - 4 693,0 thousand rubles; - extra-budgetary funds - 12,0 thousand rubles.

Projected level of funds for the implementation of the Program.

rub.)

Sources of funding

Table

9

(thousands)

Total funding

Including by years:

National budget funds Local budget funds Extrabudgetary funds Total

14304,0 4693,0 12,0 19009,0

2023 6452,0 2097,0 6,0 8555,0

2024 7852,0 2596,0 6,0 10454,0

Target indicators of the municipal program "Development and support of small and medium-sized businesses in Tabasaran district of the Republic of Dagestan" for 2022 - 2024 years

Nr. p/p

Name of target (indicator)

I'm eating here.

Table No. 10 Values of targets (indicators)

(

F A C )

2 0 1 8

Mr.

(

F A C )

2 0 1 9

Mr.

(

F A C )

2 0 2 0

Mr.

(

F A C )

2 0 2 1 g .

(

O C N A )

2 0 2 2 g .

)

(

P R N O Z

2 0 2 3 g .

)

(

P R N O Z

2 0 2 4 g .

Ed.

535

516

531

525

550

590

610

Ed.

105

129

135

172

180

185

190

percentage cents

L

t

R D

£ in

18,5

18,5

18,5

18,5

18,5

18,6

18,7

11018

16397

26986

16898

18512

20450

22153

1.

2.

3.

4.

Number of SMEs Average number of employees employed in small enterprises Share of average number of employees (without external partners) of SMEs in the average number of employees (without external partners) of all enterprises and organizations

According to Table No 10, within the framework of the municipal program "Development and support of small and medium-sized businesses in Tabasaran district of the Republic of Dagestan" 2022 -2024 The number of SMEs is expected to increase by 2024 year in comparison with the fact of 2021 the City of London 16,19 %, The average number of employees in small businesses is expected to increase 2024 year in comparison with the fact of 2021 the City of London 10,4 %. And also according to the table 10 the tax revenues of SMEs are projected to increase by 2024 year in comparison with actual data 2021the City of London 31,1 %.

Municipal program "Development of hand carpeting in Tabasaran district for 2022-2024 years"

For the forecast period 2023-2024 the Municipal Program for the Development of Hand Carpets in Tabasaran District 2022-2024 Years of funding 2 million.240 thousands of rubles, including: - at the expense of the republican budget -280,0 thousand rubles; - at the expense of the local budget - 1800,0 thousand rubles.;

- extra-budgetary funds - 160,0 thousand rubles.

Projected level of programme implementation

Sources of funding

Total funding

Table No. 11

Including by years:

National budget funds Local budget funds Extrabudgetary funds Total

280,0

1800,0 160,0 2240,0

2023 140,0

800,0 80,0 1020,0

2024 140,0

1000,0 80,0 1220,0

Within the framework of the municipal program "Development and support of small and medium-sized businesses in Tabasaran district of the Republic of Dagestan" for 2021-2024, an increase in the number of SMEs engaged in carpeting by 2024 is projected compared to the fact by 2021 (3 units) by 5 times.

Tourism

1.

In accordance with the Federal Law of 24.11.1996 No 132-F3 "On

the basics of tourist activity in the Russian Federation”, the Law of the Republic of Dagestan 29 December 2012 № 105 About approval of the republican target program "Development of tourist and recreational complex in the Republic of Dagestan 2019-2024 years" and contains the most relevant proposals and measures for their implementation in order to create a legal environment conducive to the development of tourism and the tourism industry in the municipal area developed "Tabasaran" M unipartite program for the development of tourism in the 2021 -2024 years", which was adopted at the meeting of the Assembly of deputies of the district.

Organisational and Management

the Administration

Economic

the area,"

District

and

The tourist potential of our district in terms of natural and historical cultural resources is certainly quite attractive and unique for the development of tourism The distinctive feature of Tabasaran is the magnificent landscapes, nature, rich history with cultural and historical monuments. Switzerland is often compared to Tabasaran.

In 2021 year the area was visited by about 18 you are a man, in 2022 year for

the reporting period - more than 47 you are a man.

In the area to attract tourists prepared and

Two sites are designed at the modern level:

-

territory of the fortress: "Seven brothers and one sister" and territory

"Waterfall", which in the season is visited by more than 700 tourists per day.

Within the framework of this program, so that visitors and guests of the area can navigate on the terrain, along the main routes to the 11-those designs have been installed 32 navigation signs, including QR code - the ability to instantly switch to information about the object - "Fortresses of seven brothers and one sister".

On

Tabasaran District

38

objects

Cultural Heritage of Federal Importance:

Of these, the most famous are: - Fortress XVIII - Fortress "Seven Brothers and Sisters"; - Cave "Durk" of the Middle Ages; - Khanagsky ("Khuchninsky) waterfall"; - Mosque with a minaret 1875-1876 years. in the village. Julie; - Spring - Feast (tomb) 1708-1709 in c. Gumi; - Forts of the wall "Dag-Bari" VI century. in the village of Tatila, in the village of Zile, in the village of Darvag; - Mausoleum XVIII - XIX centuries. "Bashly - Pir" in Khuchni village; - Natural bridge near the village. A wooden bridge near the village. Schiele. There are also balneological resources in the area, which contributes to

Development of medical tourism:

- source of therapeutic mud in the village of G Urik; - hydrogen sulfide source in the village of Akka; - therapeutic source in the village of Tatil. Tabasaran district is rich in natural monuments, history and culture. Under protection are 298 objects of cultural heritage of regional importance - monuments.

The most striking example is the well-known Wooden Bridge, which according to various estimates from 300 - to 700 years old, located in the village. Schille, on his way to c. Gully. It is also necessary to cancel the arch bridge in c. The rug, which is a stone structure with a height of about 25 meters.

4 projects were developed in the district

Tourists

routes with coverage of the most popular and large tourism facilities:

1. Route "Three Bridges"; 2. Route "From "Waterfall" to the cave"; 3. Route "On the Great Wall "Dag-Bars"; 4. The route "Two Ages of Islam" or "Two Sheikhs of Tabasaran". In the conditions of economic instability, tourism becomes a promising source of additional income for our region. To do this, it is necessary to provide tourists with quality rest and leisure, to equip places of their mass recreation.

Active participation in the development of infrastructure for tourism is taken by people from our region living outside our Republic of Dagestan, for example, in the construction of the following facilities:

1.

Hotel and restaurant cost - 150 million rubles for more than 90 seats;

complex

the Khanagh

Waterfall

2. 4-star Boutique Hotel - 100 million rubles in p. Khuchni

native c. Certificate, number of seats created more than 40;

3. Base recreation "Voskhod" cost - 70 million rubles in s. Kuwag

the number of seats created is more than 30;

4. Wooden ecological guest houses and Cafeteria near the fortress: "Seven brothers and one sister" cost - 20 million rubles. the number of seats -80, In addition to sleeping places- 18;

5. From wooden houses to c. Khapil is being built a tourist complex, with the name of the object - "Taba7a". The estimated cost is 30 million rubles, the number of seats created is 50.

In addition, the diversity and identity of the culture, Tabasarantsev deserves special attention, the most striking example is Tabasaran carpets.

Area

Rich

not

only

Natural

Cultural and Historical

And the people who live there:

Tabasaranians; Azerbaijanis; Aguls, etc. The development of tourism in the region will solve a number of problems of a socio-economic nature, namely, will revive rural architecture, preserve the traditional way of life, reduce unemployment, which in general will positively affect the development of the region.

3. Programme resource support

The total cost of the program is 2022 -

2024 years is 339 million 945 thousand rubles, including:

- at the expense of the republican budget -14 750 thousand rubles; - at the expense of the local budget -11 945thousand rubles; - extra-budgetary funds - 320 700,0 thousand rubles.

Projected level of programme implementation

Table 1.

Sources of funding

Funds

Total funded 14 750,0

2022 0

Including by years:

2023 9 375,0

2024 5 375,0

National Budget Extrabudgetary funds

4 495,0

45,0

2 220,0

2 230,0

100 350,0 107 955,0 Up to 2024 Year to be introduced 5 objects of tourist infrastructure

320 700,0 339 945,0

120 000,0 120 045,0

100 000,0 111 595,0

Total

Total amount 320 million. 700 thousand rubles.

4. Goals, objectives, deadlines and stages of implementation of the municipal Program

District

Touristic

The purpose of the program is to form in the Tabasaran municipal providing opportunities to meet the needs of residents of the district, Russian and foreign citizens in tourist and recreational services, which will make it possible to make a significant socio-economic development of the district, and the revival of the historical and cultural identity and originality of the native land, as well as create new jobs.

complex,

Contributor

the University of London

To achieve this goal, it is necessary to solve the following tasks: -development and implementation of advertising and information support

tourism sector;

-

creating conditions for the development of wellness,

Culturally -

historical and sports tourism;

- Expansion and improvement of the quality of tourism services. The duration of the program is up to 2024.

5. Target indicators of achievement of goals and objectives, the main expected final results of the municipal program.

During the implementation of the program, packages of documents will be developed for the development of the tourism industry and attracting investors for the implementation of tourism development projects of the Tabasaransky district.

Following the results of the Program, the development of strategies for the development of the industry, the formation of the tourist image of the region, the establishment of information and advertising support for the industry, the sale of souvenir products will be implemented.

Achievement of the goal and the solution of the tasks will serve

Targets:

Target

Importance of the target

Table 2.

Number of tourists

2021 (fact) 17198

2022 (estimate) 50638

2023 g. (forecast) 64077

2024 g. (forecast) 75800

Hotels and similar accommodation facilities

One-time capacity of hotels and similar accommodation facilities Number of publications on tourist resources and projects of the municipal "Tabasara district" in the media, units

Number of promotional and informational materials on the tourism potential of the region Number of meetings, seminars on tourism issues

14

250

2

14

250

17

360

19

440

5

5

7

20

-

1

40

2

70

2

District

Tabasaransky

According to Table No 2 it is seen that within the framework of the municipal program "Municipal target program" Tourism development in the municipal years is projected to increase the number of tourists to 2024 year in comparison with the fact of 2021 the City of London 50%, increase in hotels and similar accommodation facilities to 2024 year in comparison with the fact of 2021 the City of London 35,71 % and increase the one-time capacity of hotels and similar accommodation facilities with 250 Seats 440 Places to 2024 Year or on 76 %. Let's display these indicators graphically by years.

the District

2022 -2024

NUMBER OF TOURISTS

64077

75800

50638

17198 I

2021 (fact)

2022 (estimate)

2023 y. (forecast)

2024 y. (forecast)

Rice 1. Number of tourists in the municipal area "Tabasara district" for the period 2022 -2024 Gov.

Hotels and similar accommodation facilities

2021 (fact)

2022 y. (forecast)

2023 y. (forecast)

2024 y. (forecast)

Importance of the target

Figure 2. The number of hotels and similar accommodation facilities in the municipal district "Tabasara district" on 2022-2024 gg.

Non-recurrent capacity of hotels and similar accommodation facilities

Non-recurrent capacity of hotels and similar accommodation facilities

500 450

t 400 | 350 2 300 > 250 ? 200 I 150 * 100 50 0

Importance of the target

Figure 3. One-time capacity of hotels and similar accommodation facilities in the municipal district "Tabasaransky district" on 2022 - 2024.

6. Mechanisms of implementation of the municipal program

The municipal customer of the Program determines the main content

Programme directions and activities.

Implementation of the Program is carried out through: conclusion of municipal contracts for the purchase of goods, performance of

work and (or) provision of services necessary for the implementation of the Program.

-

Establishing and participating in basic infrastructure

Support the development of domestic and inbound tourism.

Financing

from the republican, district budget and from extrabudgetary sources in accordance with the volumes established for each financial year.

Implemented

Events

Programmes

Overall direction and control, coordination and administration

Activities for the implementation of the Program are carried out by the municipal district "Tabasara district".

The administration of the municipal district "Tabasaransky district" in the prescribed manner makes proposals for clarifying and adjusting the distribution and redistribution of program activities for financial resources.

7. Expected impact of municipal program activities

The economic effect of the municipal program will be achieved by attracting additional investment in the tourism sector in the implementation of public-private partnership mechanisms and providing economically attractive conditions for tourism activities.

objects

In the process of implementing measures, it is planned to create a developed system of infrastructures, and ensuring the effective functioning of existing tourist facilities and creating favorable conditions for the organization of new tourist facilities.

Transport

Engineering

As a result of the effective implementation of the municipal program,

The following socio-economic indicators have been achieved:

- increase in the number of tourists by 1,5 times; - increase in hotels and accommodation facilities by 35,71%; - increase in the one-time capacity of hotels and accommodation facilities

on 76%;

- increase of potential investors in tourism; - development of infrastructure in tourism. An important result of the implementation of the municipal program will be the formation of a modern tourist complex on the territory of the Tabasaransky District, capable of meeting the needs for active and full-fledged recreation, health promotion, and introduction to cultural values not only of citizens of the Tabasaransky District, but also of the tourist Republic of Dagestan. The modern product created in the municipal district "Tabasaransky district" will contribute to the formation of an attractive tourist image of the district in the domestic market, with subsequent inclusion in the regional tourist product.

competitive

1.4. The list of the main problematic issues that hinder the socio-economic development of the municipal district. 1.Development of road-street networks.

The share of the total length of public roads of local importance that do not meet the regulatory requirements is 43 %.

The administration of the Tabasaran district is actively repairing roads within the approved funding. It is envisaged in the near future in the following years to finance funds for the repair of roads of the municipal district of republican and local significance.

2. The problem of developing the provision of high-quality clean

Drinking water and water supply.

Many sources of fresh water dry up during the summer season, forcing the population to travel long distances to purchase water, which in turn leads to numerous complaints and appeals from the population.

Absence

individual water pipelines and quality drinking water in the following settlements: p. Arkith, p. Buchnag, p. Hysick, p. Gumi, p. Gurick, p. Gyukhryag, p. Darwag, p. Juljag, p. Dubeck, p. Ersi, p. Zyl, p. Karag, p. The Wallet, p. Kurek, p. Maraga, p. Rushul, p. Sirtych, p. Tatil, p. Uluz, p. Urzig, p. Uttnig, p. Halagh, p. Hapil, p. Hustil, p. Cannack, p. Cuchtig, p. Schiele, p. Chulat, p. Churdaf.

It is necessary to provide: water supply c. Darwag; -water supply c. Dubeck, p. Hustil; -water supply c. Maraga; -water supply c. Arkith, p. Rushul, p. Cannack, p. Cuchtig, p. Uttnig; -water supply c. Gurik, Gisik, Juljag, p. Churdaf, p. Kurek, p. Urzig. The problem of water supply in Tabasaran district can be solved by

participation in various programs and projects.

3. Problems of electricity supply. The main problem is the critical wear of the entire power grid of the district, for uninterrupted and high-quality supply of voltage 11684 to consumers of electricity of the Tabasaran district.

It is also necessary to locate and identify the electricity grid facilities supplying consumers in the Tabasaran district, register the rights to those facilities and organise work to bring them into compliance with technical regulations, regardless of ownership.

4. Problems of health development.

For the development of health care in the municipal area "Tabasaransky

area" is required:

1. Completion of the construction of the district polyclinic, suspended in

2007 due to lack of funding;

the University of London

Primary

2. Inclusion

the Modernization Program

health care up to 2024 for the new construction of all the remaining 11 FAS in private homes (p. Dagny, p. B. Lige, p. Sikuk, p. Sertil, p. Afna, p. Hanak, p. Acca, p. Uluz, p. Harag, p. Hysick, p. V-Gukhrag) and 26 FAPs located in adapted premises (p. G-Gyukhryag, p. Curtil, p. Kurkak, p. Cannack, p. Rushul, c. Heli-Penjik, p. Heli Penjik (Ekrag), Firgil, Gelinbatan, Maraga (Gumral), Kulif, p. Huchni (Tsalak microdistrict), p. Arak, p. Tatil, p. Curiag, p. Churdaf, p. Hurriak. C. B. Jagdig, p. Pilig, p. Zyl, p. Uttnig, p. Turuf, p. Hustil, p. Evening, p. Gasick, p. Gurik).

the University of London

3. Inclusion

the Health Care Department 2024 Years of New Construction 7 Medical laboratories (c. Turag, p. Dubeck, p. Halagh, p. Hurick, p. Darwag, p. The Wallet, p. Tinnitus) located in adapted rooms.

the Modernization Program

Primary

4. Provision of five outpatient clinics (p. Dubeck, p. Maraga, p. The Wallet, p. Juljag, p. Hurik), where there is no motor transport with new sanitary transport and replacement of the old, spent his life of sled vehicles in three medical outpatient clinics (p. Turag, p. Darwag, p. Tinit

5. Upgrading of all VA and FAPs with necessary equipment, according to

requirements.

6. Training and retraining of specialists, including outside

of the Republic, on current medical posts for work in the CRB.

5. Problems of education development. 58 educational institutions operate in the district

organizations and 37 preschool educational institutions.

Requiring

To date, there are objects of preschool and school immediately

institutions, major repairs and ensuring high technical deterioration. To solve the problems of education development of the region, it is necessary:

Construction and major maintenance of general and

Construction

New

and

preschool education;

- Purchase of necessary equipment and materials for

Effective functioning of educational institutions;

- Training of young personnel. 6. Repair of gas networks. Major repairs with reconstruction: - gas pipeline Khuchni - Gurik 0,219 mm with a length of 1900m,

with the replacement of sections of the gas pipeline with a total length of 850 m; - Gurik-Hanag gas pipeline 0,159 mm length 2300 m, lies on

the earth;

Sirtych - Gyukhryag 0,159 mm length 4500 m; AGRS

"Sirtych"-Sirtych 0219mm length 2300m.

All the above gas pipelines are still owned by the Ministry of Land and Property Relations of the Republic of Dagestan. Gazprom is working on acquiring data, and other gas pipelines, into its own property. According to the management of Gazprom Gas Distribution Dagestan LLC, the work on the reconstruction of gas pipelines will be carried out after Gazprom acquires these gas pipelines.

7. Development of agriculture. Factors hindering the development of agriculture in the region

are:

-

absence

(b) processing of the area of enterprises in agricultural products and the complete absence of production of products due to its unsuitability and deterioration of existing;

Technicians

- neglect of the Bilgandash and Ilanhol industrial canals, which are on the balance of the Derbent Federal State University of Mines and Water Resources, which have not been repaired for 10 years, have not been repaired for decades. Despite repeated appeals to various ministries and departments, this issue has been left without due attention;

repair. These

require

Channels

Uncertainty of ownership of agricultural lands of SUE "Tabasaranian" and SUE "Sardarova" due to the bankruptcy proceedings lasting more than 10 years creates difficulties for the population to register long-term lease on land, which slows down the laying of gardens and vineyards.

For development

Agriculture is offered

following

Events:

- construction of processing shops and refrigerators for storage

and processing of agricultural products.

Lack of availability and shortage of available land or

Areas can be solved in the following ways:

- Exemption

land or land in

The owners,

Use not for the intended purpose;

- Overcoming bureaucratic barriers in the transfer and registration

Land plots.

8. Lack of conditions for sports (no gyms in a number of

of human settlements).

To solve this problem, it is proposed to: -Construction of a sports complex in c. Sirtych, p. Dubeck; - Repair of gyms in educational institutions where there are

Gyms - p. Dagny, p. Hanag, p. Sirtic.

The administration of the Tabasaransky District municipal formation sets strategic goals that primarily affect the problems of securing the population in the district, the level of ensuring and providing welfare, improving living conditions for the population, creating comfort, safety and comfort for the residents of the district.

jobs,

Upgrades

Within the framework of the (RIP) Republican Investment Program 2022 Year and planning period 2023 and 2024 years of funding by area included 10 Objects in the amount of- 1 339 million. 930 thousands. 426 Rubles, including:

2 General education: - p. Hurik - by the amount - 549 million.637 thousands. 321Rubrics; p. Turuf - for the sum - 293 million.564 thousands. 055 rubles; The construction of these schools is underway. Funds were allocated for the development of design estimates for

Construction of the following facilities:

- General education organization c. Certificate for 80 student places

in the amount of 927 thousand.090 rubles;

- General education organization c. Gyukhryag for 150 student places

for the amount of -6 million.238 thousand.940 rubles. - 1 sports facility:

- Flat sports facility c. Chulat, including the preparation of project documentation totaling 9,0 million rubles. Construction continues.

5 Water supply facilities in the amount of - 480 million.563 thousands.020 Rubles: -Water supply with. Sirtych, tenders were held for the amount 80 million. 087 thousands. 380

Rubles. Construction of the water supply system at the stage of completion;

the City

Implementation

-Water supply c. Yersi-Zil, including the preparation of project documentation, the republican budget in the amount of - 61 million. 429 thousands. 466 Ruble. On this project, proceedings are underway in the Arbitration Court of the RD on the claim of the RD procurement committee against the decision of the FAS. We are waiting for new bidding. Of the total budget for 43 million.429 thousands.466 Roubles are moved to 2023year;

selected

Funds

- Plumbing with. Halagh, p. Buchnag, p. Gumi, including the preparation of project documentation, with an estimated cost of 87 million.442 thousand.069 rubles. Received a positive conclusion of the state examination;

- Water supply to villages Kozhnik, Uluz, Karag, Shile, Hapil, Tatil 2 - oy stage for the amount of - 176 million 181 thousand 012 rubles. Received a positive conclusion of the state examination;

-Water pipeline "Gyukhryag"

- Chulat", preparation of design estimates for the amount of 75 million.423 thousand.093 rubles. The object is at the stage of examination.

Also, this year, upon the submission of the TU "Rospotrebnadzor", to bring in accordance with the standards of the organization of zones of sanitary protection of underground sources of fresh water of drinking and domestic water supply, 24 projects were prepared and received on them sanitary and epidemiological conclusions of the TU "Rospotrebnadzor in the Kaitaga district".

For the years 2022 to 2023:

Electronic competition for major repairs of the following

objects:

- the entrance of the road Khuchni-Harag to the village of Khurik, on

on the km 0 - 2,5 section, for an amount of 81 million 789 thousand 280 rubles — 2,5 km;

- road FAD "Caucasus" - Sirtych - Tatil, on the site

km 32-39 km for the amount of 316 million 875 thousand 722 rubles

- road Khuchni - Harag, on the section of km 7- 11 for the amount of -

19 million 997thousands 760 rub.- 4 km.

Funds were allocated for the development of design estimates for

Major repairs of the following facilities:

-

road FAD "Caucasus" - Sirtych - Tatil, on a stretch of km

42-46 km for the amount of 6 million 032 thousand 840 rubles;

- road Khuchni - Juljag, on the section of km 0- km 8 on

total - 5 million. 288 thousand. 798 rub.- 8 km.

For the year 2023 under the national project "Liter and urban environment", under the regional program "Formation of a comfortable urban environment in the Republic of Dagestan" it is planned to include 3 construction objects for the amount of 5 million 895 thousand 843 rubles:

— Khuchni village: 3 million 461 thousand 436 roubles; — Turag village: 1 million 243 thousand 199 roubles; — Tinit village: 1 million 191 thousand 208 roubles.

Head of the municipal district "Tabasara district" of the Republic of Dagestan

M.S. Kurbanov

2. Table material: 2. 1. "The rates of the main socio-economic indicators of the district for 2020-2021 years"

Annex No. 1

Indicators

2020 years

2021 years

Average for the year 2

Volume of shipped goods of own production of works performed and services by own efforts Agricultural products in all categories of farms Investments in fixed assets at the expense of all sources of financing The volume of works performed by the type of activity "construction" Entering of residential houses Retail trade The volume of paid services to the population The receipt of taxes, fees and other payments to all levels of budgets, including the consolidated budget of MR "Tabasaransky district" Real disposable income of the population

111,2

113,3

112,3

105,2

102,9

104,1

74,2

134,4

104,3

83,8

83,8 101,5 104,0

109,6

103,5

104,3

142,4

114,4 100,5 101,9

108,8

106,0

111,4

113,1

98,9 101,0 205,9

109,2

104,8

107,8

102,9 (21673,3 rub.)

2801 people -in 9 times

113,7 (24644,9 rub.)

91,91

105,4 (23159,1 rub.)

2678 people

2.2. The main indicators of socio-economic development of the municipal district "Tabasara district", according to the forecasted estimate for 2022 years.

Indicators

Annex No. 2

2021 years

Report

2022 year forecast g estimate

Economic growth of production sectors (% compared to the previous year)

own services

goods of work performed and

Gross regional product Volume of shipped production, own-account Agricultural products in all categories of farms Investments in fixed assets at the expense of all sources of financing Volume of completed works by type of activity "construction" Volume of paid services to the population

(consolidated budget) - total

Finance

Income million rubles.

including tax and non-tax revenues,

million rubles.

Real disposable income, % to the previous year Average monthly salary per employee, rub.

Nominally

Accrued

-

103,7

102,9

134,4

142,4

100,5 101,9

-

131,5

100,9

106,1

106,3

105,0 102,7

1552,638

1539,046

168,228

169,895

111,4

107,9

21644,9

26813,7

Number of unemployed persons registered in state employment service institutions (at the end of the year), thousands of people.

Registered unemployment rate, %

2555

4,3

1670

1,5

The main indicators of economic development of the Tabasaransky district in 2020-2025 (increase/decrease, % to the previous year)

Indicators

Volume of shipped goods of own production, performed works and services by own forces

Agricultural products

Investments in fixed assets

Construction

Retail trade turnover

The volume of paid services to the population

Report

Ratings - ca

Annex No 3 Forecast (option 2)

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

11,2

5,2

-25,8

-16,2

1,5

4,0

83,4

2,9

34,4

42,4

0,5

1,9

31,5

0,9

6,1

6,3

5,0

2,7

7,3

2,8

7,0

6,5

5,2

2,9

8,1

3,3

7,9

6,7

5,5

3,5

13,25

3,9

9,0

7,0

6,0

4,3

Average monthly nominal wage per employee

Number of registered unemployed (at the end of the period) (thousands)

2,9

13,7

8,8

9,6

10,8

12,3

2,8

2,6

1,6

1,6

1,5

1,4

The main indicators of the forecast of socio-economic development of M R "Tabasaran district" for the year 2023 and the planning period 2024 and 2025

2.3.

Annex No4

Name

Macroeconomic indicators

Number of permanent population (average annual) 1 Volume of shipped products (works, services)

Index of Industrial

Production

deflator index

Agricultural products in farms of all categories

growth rate

deflator index

Investments in fixed assets from all sources of financing

growth rate

deflator index

The scope of work performed by type of activity "Construction"

growth rate

deflator index

Unit of measurement

Actual data

2019

Actual data

2020

Actual data

Evaluation

Forecast

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2025

% in 2021

thousand people

million rubles. % before. year % before. year

million rubles. % before. year % before. year

million rubles. % before. year % before. year

million rubles. % before. year % of

50,3

50,3

52,4

52,6

52,9

53,2

53,5

102,1

101,2

112,5

127,5

270,0

289,7

313,2

354,7

102,8

111,2

113,3

211,8

107,3

108,1

113,25

278,2

102,0

111,2

183,4

112,0

104,1

104,0

103,9

2627,8

2765,2

2886,4

3010,0

3094,28 3196,391

3321,05

101,9

105,2

104,3

104,2

102,8

103,3

103,9

115,1

101,9

105,2

104,3

105,0

104,9

104,9

104,9

677,0

502,4

675,0

716,2

766,3

826,8

901,2

129,3

129,2

74,2

75,5

134,4

106,1

132,4

108,5

107

105

107,9

104,0

202,9

170,0

253,5

257,3

274

292,3

84,9

83,8 83,8

149,1 149,1

101,5 101,5

106,5 103,9

106,7 103,8

109

133,1

103,6

312,7

107 103,5

123,4

Retail trade turnover

growth rate

deflator index

The volume of paid services to the population

growth rate

deflator index

Employee Wages Fund

growth rate

Average monthly nominal wage of employees

growth rate

The number of people with income below the subsistence minimum as a percentage of the total population (according to RD) The number of people employed in the economy (average annual) in the methodology of the APC The total number of unemployed (according to the ILO methodology) on average per year The number of registered unemployed (at the end of the year) The unemployment rate to the economically active population:

(according to the ILO methodology) registered

pre.year

million rubles. % to pre.year % to pre.year million rubles. % to pre.year % to pre.year million rubles. % to pre.year

RUB % to the previous year

2917,0

2960,9

2976,5

3125,3

3287,8

3468,0

3676

100,7

101,5

100,5

105,0

105,2

105,5

106

123,5

100,7 403,4

101,6 419,3

100,6 427,4

116,8 438,9

109,6 451,6

109,5 466,8

104,4 486,85

101,7

104,0

101,9

102,7

102,9

103,5

104,3

113,9

101,7 1203,0

104,0 1222,6

101,5 1314,3

115,9 1444,4

110 1597,5

106,7 1790,8

106,7 2043,3

109,2

101,6

105,3

109,9

110,6

112,1

114,1

155,5

21066,8

21673,3

24644,9 26813,7 29387,8

32561,6

36566,7

107,9

102,9

113,7

108,8

109,6

110,8

112,3

148,4

rub./month

9779,8

10333,0

10628,0 12667,0

13688

14836,0

16476

155,0

% thousand thousand people thousand people

% %

14,6

19,9

1,4

0,3

6,8 1,4

14,8

20,5

4,8

2,8

7,4 9,4

14,7

20,2

6,6

2,6

28,9 4,3

14,7

21,8

0,6

0,5

1,6 1,5

13,6

12,5

11,8

22,27

22,9

23,7

117,3

0,6

0,5

1,6

1,5

0,6

0,5

1,6 1,5

0,6

0,5

9,1

19,2

1,6

1,5

2.4.Indicators of socio-economic development of MR "Tabasara district" for 10 months 2021-2022

Indicators

Unit of measurement

for 10 months 2021 g.

for 10 months 2022 g.

% to 10 months 2021 years

Annex No. 5

Volume of shipped goods of own production, performed works and services by own efforts Agricultural products, total

Crop production

Livestock Products

Total arable area* including used

Area of perennial plantings: * vineyards

Investments in fixed assets: at the expense of all sources of financing; except for budget funds

The volume of work performed on the type of activity "construction" Commissioning of residential buildings

Total housing area per inhabitant, average

The amount of land provided for construction 10 Thousands of people*

The volume of paid services to the population

Turnover of small and medium enterprises

Number of small and medium-sized enterprises in total, including: small and medium-sized enterprises; individual entrepreneurs

Average number of employees (without external part-timers) of small and medium-sized enterprises in the average number of employees (without external part-timers) of all enterprises of organizations

Tax and non-tax revenues of the district budget (city district)

Municipal

The share of financial assistance from the republican budget of the Republic of Dagestan in the total budget revenues of the municipal district (urban district), excluding subventions

Average monthly nominal wage:

Employees of the municipal district (city

District (total);

Pedagogical workers of municipal general education

institutions;

Pedagogical workers of municipal preschools

educational institutions;

employees of municipal institutions of culture and art; pedagogical workers of municipal institutions

Additional education of children

Number of new jobs created, including: high-performance jobs; investment projects

thousand rubles.

thousand rubles

thousand rubles.

ha ha ha

haha

haha

thousand rubles

thousand rubles.

sq.m

sq.m

haha

thousand rubles.

thousand rubles.

thousand rubles.

units

ed. ed.

%

171145

258600

2834236

1610821

1223415

2975417 1747672

1227745

6968

4050

16

16

391502,3

339623,2

216331,8

9756,1

23,9

2625500

365700

447

62

385

6918 4890 25 13

16

543243 225920

225920

7927

24,4

0

2631100

366600

370700

539

62 477

18,5

20,2

thousand rubles.

126867

146 608

%

65,4

73,1

rub.

rub.

rub.

rub.

rub.

units

ed. ed.

22401,7

27825

23570

23570

21010

25280,9

23404,5

24345

23650

25726,6

284

10

187

303

19 52

151,1 105,0

108,5

100,4 99,3 120,7 156,3

100,0

138,8 66,5

104,4 81,3

102,1

100,2 100,2

120,6

100,0 123,9

115,6

124,2

100,0

120,3 104,0

108,8 106,7

190,0 27,8

No. p/p

1

2

2.1

2.2

3

3.1

4

4.1

4.2

5

5.1

5.2

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

13.1

13.2

14

15

16

17

17.1

17.2

17.3

17.4

17.5

18

18.1

18.2

2.5. Comparison of the dynamics of the rates of the main indicators of socio-economic development of the Tabasaransky district in 2020-2021 with the Republican.

2021g.

SKFO

2020

SKFO

Indicators

Volume of goods shipped, works performed and services Agricultural products Investments in fixed assets Construction

Introduction of residential buildings

Volume of paid services to the population Real disposable income of the population Average monthly salary of one employee

Number of officially registered unemployed (thousands) %

RD 104,5

101,4 113,6 99,6

95,2

94,4

96,8

120,3

in 5,2times

district 111,2

105,2 74,2 83,8

83,8

101,5 104,0 104,3

RD 112,1

102,8 88,6 102,0

106,3

101,0 101,1 100,4

102,9

101,9

2,801 or 9 times

34 or 3,12 times

Table No. 1

district 113,4

104,4 134,4 149,1

114,4

100,5 101,9 111,4

114,0

91,21

2.6. Information on the program "Municipal roads of the Republic of Dagestan" for the year 2021 (excises)

No p / p

Name of object

Estimated value

Price contract a

Table No. 2

Length of km.

The amount of work done, rub-

1. Repair of In-Rural Automobiles

"Huchninsky village council" JV roads. Repair of the road on Ildarova Street in c. Khuchni

2. Repair of In-Rural Automobiles

"Khuchninsky village council" JV roads. Repair of the road on the street Hospital in s. Go on.

3. Repair of In-Rural Automobiles

"Hapilsky village council" JV roads. Repair of the road. Central, p. Tatil.

4. Repair of In-Rural Automobiles

"Hapilsky village council" JV roads. Repair of the road along the street Koltsevaya, p. Hapil.

5. Repair of In-Rural Automobiles

Roads JV "Maraginsky village council". Repair of the road on Dzhurdakskaya Street, p. Maraga.

6. Repair of In-Rural Automobiles

Roads JV "Maraginsky village council". Repair of the automobile road along Helibatanskaya Street, p. Gelinbatan. 7. Repair of In-Rural Automobiles

The road. Repair of the road in c. Dagny. 8. Repair of In-Rural Automobiles

"Kurkaksky village council" JV roads. Repair of the Sika-Vartatil road.

2 136,690

2 136,690

2 136,690

0,53

2 552,640

2484,994

2484,994

0,93

2 765,980

2765,980

2765,980

0,70

1 033,730

1 033,730

1 033,730

0,26

1 435,240

1 435,240

1 435,240

0,36

1 270,220

1 270,220

1 270,220

0,32

3 958,660

3 958,660

3 958,660

1,00

2 454,570

2 454,570

2 454,570

2,50

TOTAL

17 607,73

17 534,9

17 534,9

6,6

2.7. Register of Investment Projects Implemented in Tabasaran District for 01.11.2022

Name of the Investment Project

Amount of investment, million rubles.

Level of readiness of the investment project

Total funds invested, million rubles

1 %

1 1

2

3 4 5

6 7

8

9

2 KFH "Gyulov. T"

KFH Kurbanov A."

KFH "Kurbanov A" KFH "Gyulov. T" KFH "Kurbanov N."

KFH Agasiev G. KFH Magomedov I.

"Zanak"

"Dagfruit"

10

"Dagfruit"

a in t d e r s

e e n e e c b o C

a in t d e r s

e e e e e e e e l e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e

5

ogess

3

4

90

35

7,5 26

7,7

21

12

80

2,3

3,2

45

18

3,0 14

4,1

9

4

30

0,6

1,3

45

17

4,5 12

3,6

12

8

50

1,7

1,9

a A L P

-

C N C and B

e and h and l a N

6

+

+

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

+

- +

D S P

e and h and l a N

7

+

+

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

+

N n n o n n n n n n n n n n c n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n

e and h and l a N

I and n a c and p o

e e e

and

and c c a c c e e l p

8 vineyards

and c a z l a e r

O L A H

d o g ,

I'm with M.

(

9

n a l p

, e and n s r e in a Z

D O G

,

I'm with M.

(

10

15.01.2018

30.10.22

vineyards

01.06.2017

30.10.22

int. garden 5 ha wines. 26 ha

12.01.19 15.02.18

10.2023 10.2022

Int.sad. 5 ha

20.03.19

10.2023

Vin-k 20ha

12 ha wine-to-wine storage

25.03.19

25.10.19

11.2023

11.2024

Autumn 2021

11.2022

Int. Garden-5 ha

Autumn 2021

11.2026

Int.sad-8 ha

Spring 2020

11.2024

.

l e h . t c e m

x and h o b a r

T A D O S

I am with t e y r and n a l P

11

55

21

3 10

3

5

3

7

1

2

: o g e s B

12

88

34,9

7,5 25,7

8,0

19,7

10,1

75

2,0

3,2

Table No. 3

Incl. invested in the reporting period (as of 1.07.2022year), mln. rub

A brief description of the work performed during the reporting period (as of 01.07.2022g), including an indication of the volume of products produced and jobs created.

the D E R S

x n n e t c b o s

.

t . t

the University of London

the D E R S

x e e e e e e l e r p

.

h. t B

the D E R S

x n n e t c b o s

.

t . t

Oges

SV V

13

14

15

16

45

17,9

4,1 12,4

2,4

11,3

4,7

20

0,5

1,1

43

17

3,4 13,3

5,6

8,4

5,4

50

1,5

2,1

4,0

0,4

0,1 1,0

0,3

1,0

1,0

35

0,5

0,6

-

0,4

-

1,0

0,3

-

15

0,3

0,4

the D E R S

x e e e e e e l e r p

.

t . t

the University of London

17

4,0

-

0,1 -

-

1,0

1,0

20

0,2

0,2

18

vineyards 90ga, created jobs - 4 vineyards 31ga, created jobs - 4

Inten.sad 5They created jobs- 2 Winog. 26 They created jobs-2 Garden Intensive 5They created jobs- 3 vineyards 20They created jobs-5 vineyards 12They created jobs-3

Grape-storage 1000 tn Slave places- 7 Intensive garden 5 They created jobs-1 Intensive garden 8 haha

Total

284,7

129

155,7

110

274,1

119,4

149,7

43,9

17,4

26,5

2.8. Program "Formation of the modern urban environment" for 2022 year by MR "Tabasara district"

Name of object

CONTRACT

Funds management

Contractors

Table No. 4 Development rate

Improvement of the square in s. Yersi Tabasaran District RD

Improvement of the square in s. Gyukhryag Tabasaran District RD

Improvement of the square in s. Khapil Tabasaran District RD

1 616 240,70

1 616 240,70

LLC "ISTOK"

1 031 592,00

1 031 592,00

950 000,00

950 000,00

LLC "SYNERGY"

LLC "SYNERGY"

100

100

100

№

1

2

3

Total

3 597 832,70

3 597 832,70

2.9. Priority project^Local initiatives on the MP "Tabasara district" 2022 St Petersburg.

Municipal education and Name of the facility

No p/p 1 1 Major renovation of the building of the MBU

2

the " Multifunctional Youth Center " of Tabasaran District RD

2 Major renovation of the village house of culture p. Pylig Tabasaran district RD Completion of major repairs of the building of MKUK "M CBS" Tabasaran district RD

3

Total

Sources of funding

Republican budget 4 4 979 790,00

Local budget

5

1 250 000,00

Extrabudgetary 6 1 190 000,00

3 7 419 790,00

Table No. 5

3 467 830,00

2 322 830,00

590 000,00

555 000,00

11 475 130,00

7 705 130,00

1 930 000,00

1 840 000,00

Total

22 362 750,00

15 007 750,00

3 770 000,00

3 585 000,00

2.10. Municipal Development Program for Small and Medium

medium-sized businesses in the municipal area

"Tabasara district" for 2022-2024 years.

Projected level of programme implementation

Sources of funding

National budget funds Local budget funds Extrabudgetary funds Total

Total financial resources 14304,0 4693,0 12,0 19009

Table No. 6 (thousand rubles) Including by years:

2023

2024

6452,0 2097,0 6,0 8555

7852,0 2596,0 6,0 10454

Information on target indicators and indicators of the municipal program "Development and support of small and medium-sized businesses in the

Tabasaran District

the Republic of Dagestan for 2022 - 2024 years

Name of target (indicator)

No p / p

I'm the only one who's gonna change my mind.

Table No. 7 Values of targets (indicators)

(

F A C )

2 0 1 8

Mr.

(

F A C )

2 0 1 9

Mr.

(

F A C )

2 0 2 0

Mr.

(

F A C )

2 0 2 1 g .

(

O C N A )

2 0 2 2 g .

(

the Russian Academy of Sciences )

2 0 2 3 g .

(

the Russian Academy of Sciences )

2 0 2 4 g .

1. Number of SMEs

Ed.

535

516

531

525

550

590

610

2.

3.

4.

Average number of employees employed in small enterprises Proportion of average number of employees (without external part-time) of SMEs in the average number of employees (without external part-time) of all enterprises and organizations

Ed.

105

129

135

172

180

185

190

Ntow

18,5

18,5

18,5

18,5

18,5

18,6

18,7

About

L

t

YU

R D

£ in

11018

16397

26986

29417

32100

35450

38800

2.11. The unique program "Development of hand carpeting in Tabasaran district for 2022-2024 years".

Projected amount of funds for the implementation of the Program "Development of hand carpeting in Tabasaran district for the years 2022-2024".

Sources of funding

Total funding

Volume

Republican

Local budget Extrabudgetary

280,0

1800,0 160,0 2240,0

Tom

In years: 2023 140,0

800,0 80,0 1020,0

Table No. 8

the City Council

2024 140,0

1000,0 80,0 1220,0

2.12. "Municipal program of tourism development on 2021 -2024years"

Projected level of programme implementation

Sources of funding

National budget funds Local budget funds Extrabudgetary funds

Total

Total funded

14 750,0

Table No. 9. (thousand rubles.) Including by years:

2022 0

2023 9 375,0

2024 5 375,0

4 495,0

45,0

2 220,0

2 230,0

320 700,0 339 945,0

120 000,0 120 045,0

100 000,0 111 595,0

100 350,0 107 955,0

Targets for achieving goals and objectives, key

Expected Outcomes of the Municipal Programme

Target

Importance of the target

Table 10.

Number of tourists

Hotels and similar accommodation facilities One-time capacity of hotels and similar accommodation facilities Number of publications on tourist resources and projects of the municipal "Tabasara district" in the media, units Number of advertising and information materials on the tourist potential of the district Number of meetings, seminars on tourism

2021 (fact) 17198 14

2022 g. (estimate) 50638 14

2023 g. (estimate) 64077 17

2024 g. (estimate) 75800 19

250

250

360

440

2

5

5

7

— 20

-

1

40

2

70

2

2.13. The list of projects under the program "Formation of a comfortable urban environment in the Republic of Dagestan", planned for the municipal district "Tabasara district" for 2023 year

Table No. 11

Nr. p/p

Name of municipality

The amount of financial resources for the improvement of yard and public areas for 2023 year, rubles Federal budget

Republican Budget

Total

1 Improvement of the square p. Turag

1 243 199,00

1 230 767,00

12 432,00r

2 Improvement of the square p. Tinit

1 191 208,00

1 179 296,00

11 912,00r

3 Improvement of the square p. Khuchni

3 461 436,00

3 426 822,00

34 614,00r

Total

5 895 843,00

5 836 885,00

58 958,00r

2.14. Information on the work done on the Republican

to the road fund Transp.tax (subsidy) for 2022

№

Name of object

4

2

3

6

5

1 Repair st. Ring in c. Khuchni Repair st. Arkitskaya in s. Arkit Tabasaran district RD Repair of automobile road on the street. Osmanova in p. Huchni Repair of roads on the street. New, Orekhovaya, Urzigskaya with the organization of storm drain Repair of the public road G ullig-Urzig Repair of the road on the street. Lenin to the new kindergarten c. Sirtych Repair of the public road from Juljag Harhni to c. Churdaf Major road repairs on the street. Ring in c. Hapil Repair of public road from Khuchni -Juljag to s. Harhni - G Asik Major road repair Dagny-G hurrag Road repair on the street. Hospital to 4 sq.m. residential buildings with the organization of storm drain in s. Khuchni Tabasaran District RD

7

8

9

10

11

Total

Table No. 12

Estimated value

Contract price

Funds management

1 781 090

1 781 090

3 015 390

3 015 390

3 015 390

947 350

947 350

947 350

3 083 550

3 052 714,50

3 083 550,0

1 500 180

1 500 180

1 500 180,0

1 248 860

1 248 860

1 248 860

1 481 400

1 022 166

1 022 166,0

3 094 580

2 614 920,10

2 614 920,10

2 519 750

2 519 750

2 000 000

3 042 190

3 042 190

3 042 190

969 730 22 684 070 21 714 340

969 730

18 474 606,10

2.15. M Unilateral road fund for 2022

№

Name of object

Repair of the road on the street. West of the street. Central 34 in p. Dubek Tabasaran district RD. Repair of rural roads in the village of Tabasaran district RD Repair of the road on the street. Ring in c. Khuchni Tabasaran District RD

Repair of intra-rural roads in the Ministry of Defense of the village council "Tinitsky" Tabasaran district RD

Repair of the access road to the MBU MFMC in c. Khuchni Tabasaran District RD

Repair of intra-rural roads in the Ministry of Defense of the JV "Khurik village council" Tabasaran district RD

Repair of intra-rural roads in the village of Yersinsky Tabasaran district of RD

Repair of intra-rural roads in the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Tatarstan

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Estimated value

Contract price

Table No. 13

871 670

871 670

871 670

771 790

603 034,15

603 034,15

770 930

770 930

770 930

867 730

867 730

867 730

1 757 110

1 757 110

1 757 110

1 384 440

1 384 440

1 384 440

675 410

675 410

675 410

771 850

771 850

771 850

Total

7 870 930

7 702 174

7 702 174

M Unilateral road fund (excises). The only supplier for 2022 g.

№

Name of object

CONTRACT

Table 13a.

Funds management

Contractors ki

% completed

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Repair of intra-rural roads in the Ministry of Agriculture of Arak Repair of intra-rural roads of the Ministry of Agriculture of Burgankent Repair of intra-rural roads of the Ministry of Agriculture of Guminsk Repair of intra-rural roads of the Ministry of Agriculture of Guriksky 2

386060,00

386060,00

LLC "MK"

482502,60

482502,60

482505,6

482505,6

IP "Ismailov Rajab" LLC "MK"

385850

385850,00

LLC "MK"

473120,00

473120,00

Repair of intra-rural roads of JV "Village Gyukhryag"

372331,20

372331,20

IE "Ismailov Rajab" IE "Ismailov Rajab" LLC "MK"

IE "Ziyaudinov Eldar"

289500,00

289500,00

530972

530972,00

385850

385850,00

LLC "MK"

10 Repair of in-village vehicles

359030,00

359030,00

LLC "MK"

Repair of intra-rural roads MV "Selsovet Kurkaksky" Repair of intra-rural roads MV "Selsovet Maraginsky" Repair of intra-rural roads . "Halagh village council"

Khili - Pendzhiksky Village Council

11 Repair of intra-rural road on the street. Rajabova in p. Khuchni Tabasaran District RD

12 Repair of the access road to the school in c. Khurik Tabasaran District RD

276950,00

276950,00

LLC "MK"

100

578113,20

578113,20

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

13 Construction of a retaining wall on

588000

588000

the Khuchninsky waterfall Tabasaran district RD

14 Repair of in-village vehicles

291255,60

291255,60

the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine "Chulat Village"

15 To complete the construction of a footpath to the school and repair the streets c. Karag Tabasaran District RD

579859,00

579859,00

Total

6461899,20

6461899,20

100

100

100

100

IE "Ismailov Rajab" IE "Mazalayev Rasim" IE "Ismailov Rajab" IE "Ismailov Rajab"

Tourist infrastructure facilities in Tabasaran district,

under construction.

Nr. p/p

Naimenova

Description

1

Sunrise.

2

"Butik Hotel"

3

"Waterfall"

4

as yet untitled

5

"tabaza"

Base recreation "Sunrise" in s. Cuvag. The first house-administrative building was built, another 7 ethnohouses are being built, an open playground-restaurant for holding solemn events, a kitchen, a newlyweds' house and parking are provided.

Estimated cost - 70 million rubles. 4-their star boutique hotel with swimming pool, restaurant, gym, steam room, salt caves and rooftop penthouses. A viewing elevator, tandoor and barbecue will be installed. On the top floor will be 2 Penthouse.

Estimated cost - 90 million rubles.

The restaurant and hotel complex is located on the Khanag waterfall. Each of the 3 floors of the complex will be made in a special style, the main part of the facade overlooking the waterfall will be sheathed with glass. The complex will have an entertainment center, 20 rooms of different classes, including suites, as well as a restaurant and a parking zone.

Estimated cost - 100 million rubles.

Wellness complex with a restaurant, 6 rooms for 40 square meters, kitchen, common hall and access to the river.

Estimated cost - 30 million rubles.

The tourist complex which will be: 6 Log cabins, 4 A - Frame House (2 Floors), 2 floor dining room with national cuisine, gazebos and access to the river.

Estimated cost - 30 million rubles.

Table No. 14

Number of seats

Location address

30

40

in c. Kuvag Tabasaransk

c. Huchni, st. Gornaya

40

Khanag waterfall

30

50

c. Hapil, at a/road "Derbent-Khuchni-Hiv" at 42 km.

c. Hapil, at a/road "Derbent-Khuchni-Hiv" at 42 km.

The bed will be created.

Total:

Investments for the year 2022-2023: 320 million rubles

190

Republican investment program of the Republic of Dagestan for 2022 and for the planning period 2023 and 2024

Annex No. 6

Buildings and facilities

Start of construction year

Year of completion a (plan)

Power in c.d.

Public investments

2022 years

2023 years

2024 years

Total (thousand rubles)

input powerful stp (cot. ed.)

Total (thousand rubles)

Total (thousand rubles)

Total (thousand rubles)

№

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

the General Educational Organization 5 0 0 Student places in c. Khurik, Tabasaran district General education organization 100 Student places in c. Turuf, Tabasaran district General education organization 80 Student places in c. Siertpl Tabasaran district, preparation of project documentation Construction of a general education organization 150 Student places in c. Tyukhryag Tabasaran district, preparation of project documentation Pre-school educational organization 60 Places c. Sirtich, Tabasaran district, Republic of Dagestan Flat Sports Building in c. Chulat Tabasaransky district, including the preparation of project documentation Sirtych Tabasaran District of the Republic of Dagestan Vodoproaod p. Kh alag, Bukhnag, Gumi Tabasaran district of the Republic of Dagestan, including preparation of project documentation Water supply to villages, Zil Tabasaran district, including preparation of project documentation

1

2

3

4

5

B

7

8

9

2020

2020

2022

2022

2020

2024

500 students. Seats

131574.716

311541.825

106520.780

549 637,321

2023

100 students. Seats

106000.000

187564.055

293 564,055

80 V4. Seats

927.090

150 students. Seats

6238.940

2022

60 seats

560,938 60 seats

927,090

6 238,940

560,938

2022

2023

1500 sq. m.

4350,057

4649,943

9 000.000

2020

2022

8,7 km

110068,355

8.7 km

110 068,355

2020

2023

8.0 km

1545.910

48555.440

50 101,350

2020

2023

18000.000

43429.466

61 429,466

Total

379266.006

595740,729

106520,780

1 081 536,515

Project materials · Full published text

Development program up to 2030

Source status: Project

Development program up to 2030 - project materials.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/programmma-razvitiya-do-2030.html

Open on the site

GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

R A S P O R J E N E

from 20 May 2023 No 1315-r

MOSCOW

1. Approve the attached Concept of technological development

for the period up to 2030 (hereinafter referred to as the Concept).

2. The federal executive bodies shall be guided by the provisions of the Concept when developing and implementing sectoral strategic planning documents, state programs (subprograms) of the Russian Federation and other strategic planning documents.

3. Recommend: the state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local self-government bodies should be guided by the provisions of the Concept when developing and implementing regional programs (subprograms) and other documents;

to state corporations and interested joint-stock companies with state participation to ensure the inclusion in their strategies of ensuring the technological development of the Russian Federation, and to 30 October 2023 to send the updated strategies of activities to the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia.

directed

Activities

The measures,

the City

4. The Ministry of Economic Development of Russia together with the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia

ensure:

development within a month with the participation of the authorities

federal plan of priority measures for its introduction in the Government of the Russian Federation;

Executive

bodies

organizations concerned and the implementation of the Concept

2

preparation and annual submission to the Government of the Russian Federation 30 November the year following the report, the report on the implementation of the Concept, including an assessment of progress in achieving the goals and targets of the Concept, and the need for updating and opportunities for technological development of the Russian Federation.

Clarification of the Concept

Challenges and

Accounting

C

Prime Minister of the Russian Federation

M. Mishustin

Approved by the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 20 May 2023 No 1315-r

K O N C E P Z

technological development up to 2030 years

I. General

The concept of technological development for the period up to 2030 - the Concept) defines the challenges, principles and goals

(further technological development for the period up to 2030.

The concept is being developed as part of the implementation of the list of instructions of the President of the Russian Federation following the meeting of the Council under the President of the Russian Federation on strategic development and national projects, held 18 July 2022 (No. Pr-1553 of 1 September 2022).

Law

The legal basis of the Concept is the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Federal "On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation", the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 1 December 2016 № 642 "On the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation", Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 5 December 2016 № 646 "On Approval of the Doctrine of Information Security of the Russian Federation", Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 21 July 2020 № 474 National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2030 Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 21 January 2020 № 20 "On Approval of the Doctrine of Food Security of the Russian Federation", Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 2 July 2021 № 400 "On the Strategy of National Security of the Russian Federation" and other regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation.

Concept

Generalizes

materials

Strategic

the Government of the Russian Federation June

The sessions,

2

Implementation

strategic year to determine the priority August 2022 activities of the Government of the Russian Federation, taking into account the restrictions and risks associated with sanctions pressure.

development of high-tech sectors of the economy of the Russian Federation, which characterizes it as an industry document of strategic planning of the Russian Federation, which determines the development of a certain sphere or industry of the economy.

Directed

Concepts

The concept is the basis for the development

(adjustments) and implementation of state programs (subprograms) of the Russian Federation, regional programs (subprograms) of subjects of the Russian Federation, schemes of territorial planning of the Russian Federation, as well as planning and program-targeted documents of state corporations, state companies and joint-stock companies with state participation.

II. Basic concepts

Concepts used in the Concept mean the following: "the most important innovative projects of national importance" - a complex of interrelated resources, performers and timing of activities, which is aimed at achieving the necessary economic effect that is important for the economy as a whole or large sectors of the economy;

National

safety,

Levels

"Venture investment" means investment in technology companies at an early stage and growth stage, aimed at creating and bringing to market promising products related to the probability of loss of funds invested in a particular company, as well as failure to achieve the planned result and high expected potential returns from the totality of such investments;

“technological development challenges” means a set of problems, threats and opportunities in the development and implementation of technologies, the complexity and scale of which are such that they cannot be solved, eliminated or implemented without structural changes solely due to an increase in resources;

3

-

goods,

High - tech

Related products” to the following product groups in accordance with the United Nations Standard International Trade Classification: weapons, measuring instruments, scientific and optical instruments, computer and office equipment, space and other aircraft, including unmanned, non-electrical machinery and equipment, medicines and medical instruments, chemical products and materials, electrical machinery, electronics and telecommunications equipment;

The Contract

Investment

a tool for direct and (or) venture investments, in which fellow investors undertake to carry out joint activities without forming a legal entity and make their contributions to common property to finance innovative projects;

Partnerships »

-

Modern

Competitive

"import substitution" - the process of creating new or developing existing industries and technologies in the Russian Federation, designed to replace imported goods, services and technologies. Import substitution, as a rule, is carried out in the form of localization of production and technologies on the territory of the Russian Federation, reproduction of technologies, or in the form of reorientation of cross-border production chains to stable (reliable) suppliers importing goods, services and technologies to the territory of the Russian Federation;

"Innovative Products"

- new or technological changes of varying degrees during the last 3 years goods, works, services;

Purpose

which

Main

Activities

"innovative scientific and technological center" - a set of organizations, the implementation of scientific and technological activities, and other persons whose activities are aimed at ensuring the functioning of such a center, operating in a certain Government of the Russian territory is applied by the Federation preferential scientific and implementation of technological and other activities aimed at increasing the investment attractiveness of the field of research and development, commercialization of their results, as well as increasing the access of citizens and legal entities to participate in promising scientific and technological projects;

territories. On legal

the specified regime

4

"Innovatively oriented economic growth"

- type of socio-economic development, provided mainly by economic technological innovations and the resulting effects of their implementation, including the production of value added and capitalization of companies and corporations;

"innovation project" - a set of measures aimed at achieving economic effect on the implementation of innovations, including the commercialization of scientific and (or) scientific and technical results;

«institutions of innovative development» are specialized organizations created by the state, whose activities are aimed at stimulating technological innovations and obtaining economic effects from their implementation, as well as creating conditions for the development of the provision of companies, financing;

Technology

including

“Intelligent

protected results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization (trademarks, etc.), which are provided with legal protection;

property"

-

an organisation,

"company-leader"

concluded a Russian agreement with the Government of the Russian Federation in the field of end-to-end technology development and carrying out activities to develop markets for innovative products produced using end-to-end technologies, to stimulate the production of such products, to ensure the development of appropriate infrastructure and training;

Science and Technology

and groceries,

"critical technologies" - industry technologies that are critical for the production of the most important types of high-tech products and the creation of high-tech services, having economies, system country socio-economic solutions and state security;

Importance for Functioning

Tasks and Defense

"localization of production" - the creation in the Russian Federation of production based on foreign technologies, in which the management of further technical documentation, the production of key components) to some extent remains outside the Russian Federation;

(The competence,

Technology

Development

"small technology company" - a technology company,

simultaneously meeting the following criteria:

5

non-exceedance of the limit value of the organization's revenue (revenue from the sale of goods (provision of services, performance of works) both of its own production and previously acquired, proceeds from the sale of property rights) for the previous calendar year determined in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation;

Main

Conformity

Economic

activity of an organization to one of the main types of economic activity included in the list of main types of economic activity, which is determined in accordance with the procedure established by the legislation of the Russian Federation in accordance with the All-Russian Classifier of Economic Activities;

compliance with the level of scientific and technical potential of the organization to the level determined in accordance with the procedure established by the legislation of the Russian Federation;

availability of opportunities for the use (implementation) of innovative technologies in the development and (or) production of products (provision of services, performance of works);

which

"small innovative enterprises" - economic companies, in practical application of the activity (introduction) of the results of intellectual activity, the exclusive rights to which belong to the founders (participants) of such economic companies - scientific organizations or educational organizations of higher education;

The World

“best available technology” means a technology for the production of products (goods), the performance of work, the provision of services, determined on the basis of modern scientific and technological achievements and the best combination of criteria for achieving environmental protection objectives, provided that such technology is technically feasible;

-

“National

Technological Initiative"

Association of representatives of business and expert communities for the development of promising technological markets and industries in the Russian Federation. The national technological initiative includes a system of organizational forms (platforms) that ensure the activity of such associations, appropriate measures for their stimulation and support, as well as infrastructure (centers of the National Technological Initiative on the basis of educational institutions of higher education and scientific organizations, infrastructure centers, collective

6

of space). The activities of the National Technology Initiative include support for projects to implement the National Technology Initiative action plans and projects aimed at creating conditions for achieving technological leadership and (or) technological centers of the National Technology Initiative for the development of end-to-end technologies, popularization and support of small technology companies, acceleration of teams involved in the creation of small "circle" movement that brings together technology companies, schoolchildren, students, their parents, teachers, mentors in teams to solve technological problems, training and others;

sovereignty,

Implementation

programs

"Advanced Engineering School"

- the structural unit of the educational organization of higher education, carrying out educational, scientific, innovative activities in accordance with the program of development of the advanced engineering school in partnership with technology companies; "Right to Risk"

- the assumption of the possibility of not achieving the planned effects of the implementation of an innovative project using state support funds due to the high level of risk (uncertainty) of innovation. Determination of the acceptable level of risk, including financial losses, as well as basic criteria for risk management in the legislation of the Russian Federation;

is fixed in

Beacon projects are projects for the formation of new markets (prototypes of markets) based on the creation of demand and supply of high-tech and innovative products, providing for the introduction of new regulatory rules or conducting a legal experiment, testing the business models of organizations. Currently, beacon projects are being implemented in the field of commercial cargo unmanned transportation in 3 environments (air, auto, water), medicine based on data processing, and the development of electric transport;

"Projects of technological sovereignty"

- projects of a full innovation cycle for the production of high-tech products based on their own development lines using critical and end-to-end technologies, covering all stages of the innovation cycle and including personnel and regulatory aspects;

"The Production System"

structures and mechanisms,

- a set of interrelated creations, sustainable

providing

7

distribution in the national economy;

handling and consumption of products and

Services

or

knowledge

Decisions,

containing

"results of intellectual activity" - intangible created objects, as a result of creative (creative) activity, including research and development. According to Article 1225 of the Code of the Russian Federation, the results of intellectual activity and equated to them means of individualization of legal entities, goods, works, services and protection (intellectual property) are:

the Fourth Civil War

provided

enterprises,

Legal

Whom

works of science, literature and art; programs for electronic computers (programs

for computers);

databases; performances; phonograms; broadcast or cabled radio or television broadcasts (broadcasting)

broadcasting or cable broadcasting organizations);

inventions; utility models; industrial designs; selection achievements; topologies of integrated circuits; secrets of production (know-how); brand names; trademarks and service marks; geographical indications; appellations of origin; commercial designations; "through"

Technology

(Technological

- advanced technologies of inter-industry purpose, ensuring the creation of innovative products and services and having a significant impact on the development of the economy, radically changing existing markets and (or) contributing to the formation of new markets. End-to-end technologies determine the perspective appearance of the economy and individual industries over the next 10 - 15 years;

directions)"

8

«own line of technology development» - a set of measures (projects, programs) and conditions that ensure the creation and sustainable development of specific domestic technologies and products based on them, including the development of their new generations. Own lines of technology development by enterprises and organizations that have the resources necessary for these purposes (research and development results, technical documentation, intellectual property rights, financing) material and competencies, including within the framework of international cooperation;

Domestic

Sources

Executed

The staff,

The base,

"agreements between the Government of the Russian Federation and leading companies" - agreements on the intentions and obligations of the parties to develop certain end-to-end technologies in order to form promising markets and create technological parties are fixed products. Relevant in the roadmaps for the implementation of agreements up to 2030;

Commitments

" Startup

Innovation

(Technologically)"

- a newly established enterprise focused on the development and (or) production of products based on a rule, idea, using new technologies. The peculiarity of a startup is the presence of a team and a technological idea. The purpose of the startup development is to capitalize the idea within the production of serial products (services) and (or) absorption by the investor company;

related,

How

"taxonomy of projects of technological sovereignty" - a list of requirements (priority criteria), according to which the investment and (or) research project is recognized as a project for the development of critical and (or) end-to-end technologies. This list is fixed in the legislation of the Russian Federation and serves for the organization of concessional financing (lending) and other measures to support projects;

"technological innovation" - a new or improved product (goods, service), process or method of production (transfer) of products introduced on the market and (or) used in the activities of the organization;

company"

"Technological

organization creating and (or) applying innovative technologies in the development and (or) production of products (services, economic work) within the framework of the main type

Commercial

-

9

activities included in the list of main types of economic activity, which is determined in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation in accordance with the All-Russian classifier of types of economic activity;

"Technological

"technological leadership" - the superiority of technologies and (or) products on the main parameters (functional, technical, cost) over foreign analogues;

regulatory, directed economic, to achieve specific goals in the field of technological development, development and implementation of new production and technological processes;

Policy of organizational

a number of other measures,

and

control)

- availability

Critical and

"Technological

"technological priority" - a group of technologies (technological directions) identified as priority. At the heart of technological priorities is ensuring technological sovereignty, accelerating innovation-oriented economic growth and ensuring the development of the country's production system; sovereignty.

(under national technologies of own development lines and conditions of production on their basis, providing a stable opportunity for the state and society to achieve their own national development goals and implement national interests. Technological sovereignty is ensured in 2 main forms - research, development and implementation of critical and end-to-end technologies (according to the established list) and production of high-tech products based on these technologies. Technological sovereignty is ensured, inter alia, on the basis of stable international scientific and technical cooperation with friendly countries;

End-to-end

Country

the University of London

Centers

Competences"

Organisational

structures, - uniting in order to strengthen the organizational integration of the results of research activities into technological chains of research organizations, development and implementation structures, private industrial partners, whose activities are aimed at creating competitive high-tech products necessary to meet the challenges of technological development;

10

Also

Organizations

"technology transfer centers" - structural units of education and scientific higher education are carried out by organizations, and organizations, commercialization of activities and involvement of researchers in solving technological problems of companies and corporations and (or) assist in this process, as well as attract organizations of the real sector of the economy as customers and partners for the implementation of research, development and technological works;

which intellectual

Results

-

development"

"Ecosystem

Technology

A set of interrelated economic and scientific-educational actors that interact on the basis of network principles, develop innovative products and services using a common set of technologies, knowledge or skills, together and on a competitive basis, significantly affecting the development of the economy, radically changing existing markets or contributing to the formation of new markets.

III. Challenges and stages of technological development

1. Challenges of the current decade

The technological development of the Russian Federation in the medium term will be influenced on the one hand by a number of external and internal threats to the technological backwardness and degradation of the Russian economy, on the other hand, by new opportunities to accelerate its innovatively oriented growth.

Should

threats to the technological development of the Russian Federation in the period from 2023 to 2030.

following

Key

highlight

The first threat is the insufficient ability of the national economy to adapt to global trends that are systemic, which leads to structural deformations of the economy and increases social tensions:

a sharp acceleration in the process of creating and distributing qualitatively new technologies, including digital ones, radically changing markets and production systems;

11

the complexity of technologies, especially in the field of microelectronics, computing, new materials, system engineering, requiring the development of appropriate competencies and deep cooperation of research;

The impact on the global economy of climate change, stimulating the spread of “green” technologies, as well as restrictive measures on the import and consumption of hydrocarbons and commodities;

Energy Saving and

Systemic disruptions in the balance of supply and demand in a number of global commodity markets, including energy, metals, fertilizers, and food markets;

formation in the most developed countries of new standards of living and quality of life, including in the field of health, education, housing and security.

The key response to the ongoing systemic changes is the use of new, primarily end-to-end, technologies, including artificial intelligence. The use of end-to-end technologies allows to significantly increase the speed of adaptation of domestic companies and corporations and the Russian economy as a whole to global trends, increase energy efficiency, cope with the emerging shortage of resources, which in turn creates an opportunity to develop end-to-end technologies, to produce innovative products based on them.

In the Russian Federation, work has also been initiated on the development of end-to-end technologies, including using the principles of public-private partnership. At the same time, the Russian Federation as a whole lags behind the most developed countries in the development and implementation of end-to-end technologies.

For example, the Russian Federation is in the top ten countries for patent and publication activity in the field of energy generation and transmission technologies, quantum technologies and new materials, and in the middle of the second ten in the field of digital technologies - artificial intelligence, new production technologies, promising mobile communication networks, the Internet of things, as well as biomedical and pharmaceutical technologies. However, it is important to note that in absolute values of indicators of patent and publication activity there is a multiple lag of the Russian Federation from the leading countries - the United States of America, the People's Republic of China and Western Europe.

12

Production

The second threat is lagging behind the most developed countries in the pace of innovatively oriented economic growth, which is due to the low motivation of developers of technological solutions to create appropriate security in technological entrepreneurs, the lack of financial resources of the market and high-tech products, as well as companies and corporations, to research and technological innovation, primarily due to low competition and the ability to buy ready-made technological solutions abroad (before sanctions).

concerning

Internal

small

Capacity

Weak

Power

In the most developed countries of the world in the last 20 years, the development and introduction of new technologies has become a key factor in economic growth and improving the living standards of the population. The use of new technologies is aimed both at improving the efficiency of existing processes and business models, and at creating new markets. It should be noted that technology has become a key factor in attracting investment and market capitalization of companies and corporations. At the same time, the main means for ensuring the growth of business capitalization are the creation and turnover of the results of intellectual activity in the field of new technologies.

Sphere

Thus, the innovative activity of companies and corporations, primarily in technological innovations, determines their sustainable competitiveness and growth potential. Low innovation activity of business in the long term means loss of sales markets, reduction of labor productivity, outflow of the most qualified personnel.

Values

indicators,

Characteristics

Innovative business activity in the Russian Federation lags behind the leading countries. So, in 2021 The share of innovative goods (services) in the total volume of shipped goods (services) in the Russian Federation was 5 percentage, while in leading European countries exceeded 15 Percentage.

important

indicator

Another technology is the volume of venture investments in the development of innovative projects in the field of technology. In terms of the share of venture investments as a percentage of gross domestic product, the Russian Federation is 11 times inferior to the average

Interest

13

Po

by countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, by the volume of venture investments - by 43 times. In terms of innovation level

The Russian Federation lags behind most of the most developed countries in business activity 2021 In the year of its size 11,9 percent, while in Canada 79,3 Federal Republic of Germany - 68,8 United States of America - 64,7 the French Republic - 54,8 Percentage of Japan - 54,2 Percentage of UK - 47,3 the People 's Republic of China - 40,8 Percentage of Federal Estimates

Autonomous educational institution of higher education "National Research University "Higher School of Economics", the return on investment in technological innovation in the Russian Federation is one third lower than in the countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. As evidenced by the data of the Global Innovation Index for the year 2022, the existing innovation potential in the country is not sufficiently used by the efficiency of the system, institutional innovation activities.

percentage, national and conditions

It is due to innovation

State

Regulation

What

61

the City

The Russian Federation’s lagging behind in these indicators tends to increase, which indicates the need to radically change the business environment in the field of technological innovation in order to increase the motivation of companies and corporations and provide them with the necessary resources for the development and implementation of technologies as the main factor in the growth of profits and capitalization of companies and corporations.

The third threat is the outflow of talents and highly qualified personnel abroad, reducing the opportunities for scientific and technological development of the country, the competitiveness of the Russian economy.

The “brain drain” is a global problem that not only the Russian Federation, but also other emerging and developed markets, have faced and continue to face at different stages of their economic activity. In the last decade, scientific and technological development has had a significant impact on the international division of labor, which determines the changes in the sectoral structure of the economies of countries associated with the emergence of the demand for personnel new technological markets.

14

ensuring these processes. In this regard, the structure of migration of human capital is undergoing changes. In particular, in the flow of free labor migration, the share of highly qualified specialists with high intellectual potential is increasing, who become participants in the global labor market, not national, but personnel (in IT specialists).

Researchers,

Engineering

young

Them

In the scientific sector, the most common reasons for the outflow of researchers’ labor are the expectations of applicants, the obsolescence of scientific infrastructure, and a shortage of sources and volumes of research funding.

become a discrepancy in the level of payment

The implementation of technological development goals will require a large number of highly qualified specialists. Leading scientists and specialists will expand opportunities for self-realization, as well as opportunities for growth of well-being. The state should provide mechanisms, opportunities to implement.

which will allow

these

The fourth threat is the disruption of the functioning of the production impact

Production

Chains)

Under

systems of sanctions restrictions in the field of technology.

(break)

In 2022, the Russian Federation faced unprecedented and long-term sanctions pressure. A ban has been imposed on the export to the Russian Federation of a wide range of goods and technologies, on the purchase of goods from third countries created with the help of Western technologies. Limited software supply and maintenance.

Goods

Smooth

Currently, the critical infrastructure of the Russian Federation, as well as the production and consumption of a number of vital degrees of imported equipment and software that are not produced in the Russian Federation. If this equipment is produced on the territory of the country, then by foreign technologies (design and technological documentation), with a critical share of imported components and materials, on imported production equipment (including computer means of design and maintenance of technological processes).

significant

the University of London

Technical means available in the country, including resources, are morally

Gradually exhausting

Yours

production,

15

and physically wear out. The process of resource depletion is accelerated by the cessation of regular maintenance and supply of spare parts. As a result, the following threats arise:

technological degradation of production systems in a wide range of industries, which is caused, among other things, by a reduction in the supply of investment equipment and technologies (75 percent of investments in machines and equipment related to their import into the territory of the Russian Federation), which makes it technically impossible to implement a number of investment projects;

Violation

Security

infrastructure,

Products

production processes, including information security;

limiting the development of their own scientific research due to the interaction of leaders,

narrowing with limited access to patents, laboratory equipment.

cooperation, technological

Scientific -

Foreign

Opportunities

Company

At the same time, it should be noted that with the acceleration of scientific and technical development, new opportunities are opening up for the Russian Federation in the next 10 years. The Russian Federation has a significant scientific and significant human resources potential and the development of technical technologies, which determines the following key opportunities for accelerating the technological development of the Russian Federation:

the most important directions

Localization of production

the Board of Directors

Industries

the University of London

in the conditions of reduction of imports and departure of foreign companies;

the use and implementation of scientific results in the sectors of the economy due to the available scientific and technological groundwork for a number of end-to-end technologies and the creation of prototypes in the conditions of undeveloped opportunities for the creation of pilot and experimental production, scale production and output in serial (mass) production;

attraction to large-scale tasks of technological development of professional engineering and technical personnel. The Russian Federation has historically strong engineering and science schools and a high level of basic physical and mathematical education, which allows us to maintain high positions in the field of software creation and development, in the field of physics and mathematics.

Against the background of leaving

foreign manufacturers domestic technology companies received

the Russian Market

16

The ability to increase sales of products. A limiting factor in such a situation is the need to quickly scale production and refine products to fully meet the needs of customers. Given the low level of development of the venture capital market, debt instruments, the task of scaling production cannot be solved by technology companies, including small ones, in a short time independently, without attracting state support.

developed

Shared

and

Thus, based on the analysis of threats and opportunities in the field of technological development, goals, tasks and mechanisms for their solution are formulated.

2. Stages of technological development

The technological development of the Russian economy since the beginning

90-ies to date should be allocated 2 major stages.

The first stage (90-ies) - disintegration and survival of scientific

technological system.

The collapse of the USSR and attempts at sweeping liberalisation of the Russian economy set in motion a series of destructive processes in science and technology that continued through inertia and could not be overcome until the mid-2000s. The most important of these processes were: the breakdown of organisational forms of interaction and integration of activities

Production

Educational

and

scientific, in the civil sphere;

"atomization" of fundamental and applied science and the outflow of scientific

personnel associated with a sharp reduction in funding;

the transition to the model of "import of technologies in exchange for

for raw materials;

degradation of the management system of science and technology as a single complex, as a result of which the possibility of implementing large scientific, technological and industrial projects was lost;

The degradation of engineering education and engineering schools. In fact, the scientific sector performed a social function - the provision of jobs and remuneration for researchers. This has led to the fact that the scientific sector has almost lost the ability to be a source of innovation.

17

The second stage (from the mid-2000-ies to the present) - the global global scientific space and

integration into production and technological chains.

and

Educational

In the Russian Federation, a number of systemic actions were taken to reform the scientific and innovative spheres and accelerate technological development aimed at integration into the world scientific and technological space. These actions, as a rule, were based on borrowings of established foreign institutions and practices, in particular, comprehensive efforts were made to integrate scientific projects and programs aimed at creating and configuring elements of the national innovation system, a number of specialized development institutions were launched (RUSNANO Joint Stock Company, Russian Venture Company Joint Stock Company, Development Fund of the Center for Development and Commercialization of New Technologies (Skolkovo Fund), Russian Science Foundation and others), and a number of financial instruments were created, (2005, Reforming the system of academic science 2013 regimes for innovative companies (2005, 2011, 2017 years).

Preferences

implemented

implemented

sectors,

Launch

years),

Efforts have stopped the degradation of science and prevented the collapse of science and technology. However, there have been no fundamental improvements in technology development. From the beginning 2000The level of research and development costs has remained unchanged until now 1 - 1,1 percentage of gross domestic product. The share of the Russian Federation in the global number of patent applications for inventions has decreased by half 1,8 Percentage up to 0,9 Percentage. The number of people engaged in research and development has decreased by a quarter 887,7 Thousands of people before 662,7 Thousands of people (2021 year). The level of innovation activity of organizations is stable in the range 9 - 11 percentage. The Russian economy remains critically dependent on imports of other high-tech goods and services.

microelectronics,

Bioengineering,

Series

The reason for this situation in the scientific and technological spheres is that the model of the Russian economy that developed at the second stage of technological development inevitably determined the place of the scientific and technological sectors on the periphery of the world scientific and technological spheres.

18

the University of London

Embedding

space.

the Economy

the World Division Structure

The global technological production and technological chains consolidated the raw material nature of Russian labor and strengthened the model of “import of technologies in exchange for raw materials”, which had developed in the 90-ies. Large business remained immune to domestic developments - buying ready-made imported technologies is easier and cheaper than investing in their own technology development lines. Emerging technology startups gravitated to the center of venture science and technology financing.

Space

developed

C

As a result, the parallel deployment of 2 system processes (metaprocesses) was fixed, each of which has its own internal logic, motivations of subjects, the language of describing problems and results.

organizations

The first is the development of science. The main goal of its subjects (educational scientific organizations) is an expanded circulation of new scientific knowledge in the framework of research and development. Technological innovation is more a by-product of this meta-process than a result of it.

education,

Higher Education

The second process is the development of the production system, within which there is a technological component. The goal of entities (companies, corporations, technology start-ups) is to update products (services), ways of production, distribution and consumption of resources, which ultimately leads to the creation of added value, the capitalization of companies, corporations and technology start-ups and increasing economic sustainability.

Now we can talk about the third stage.

technological development of the Russian economy.

The noted challenges faced by the Russian economy in the current decade determine the need for a systemic change in approaches to scientific and technological development of the country.

In the third stage, the priority of technological policy is to achieve technological sovereignty - the presence in the country (under national control) of critical and end-to-end technologies of its own developments.

Achieving technological parity in the context of limited scientific groundwork, human, material and financial resources

19

objectively requires the formation of a system of technological priorities and their consistent "end-to-end" implementation at all stages of the scientific and technological cycle.

The implementation of technological priorities means the need to conduct a state that is independent in relation to scientific, technical and industrial policy.

Technology

Policy

New

Sources

Formations

Technology

Priorities

are:

Parts

in terms of end-to-end technologies - scientific forecast (foresight);

countries of significant types of high-tech in the production of products, such as microelectronics, machines and equipment, turbines and others.

Critical Systems

Technology

-

Requirement

achievements

It does not deny sovereignty, but implies the formation of a mutually beneficial partnership with developed friendly countries in the scientific and technological spheres. At the same time, such a partnership is built on the basis of its own technological priorities.

Technology

To implement new priorities, it is necessary to form fundamentally new types of technological development entities that will become a support in solving the problems of technological development.

the University of London

If

Stage

within

Second

Subjects of technological development were industry companies, scientific organizations and educational organizations of higher education, development institutions and start-ups, then at a new stage it is critically necessary to develop complex organizational forms of management and the network format of their interaction.

Main

New subjects of technological development should be: (technological holdings, etc.), including associations of design research, educational, and production base, pilot production. Such associations can be formed by educational organizations of higher education and technology companies and will combine startups with research, infrastructure and production facilities in order to create high-tech products based on an integrated approach;

Technical

around

20

Structures Implement

scientific and educational projects

(research large-scale consortia), ready up to technological for commercialization of prototypes, the main functionality of which will be aimed at the operational solution of scientific and educational tasks by building effective interaction between the consortium participants by combining their own and external resources, reallocating these tasks between them and optimizing the costs of research, development and technological work;

Development

to

Small

companies,

Technology

both for integration into the production and technological chains of large business, and for independent deployment of serial production; (brokers), technological ensuring the development of engineering services, technology transfer and intellectual property rights, and organization of international cooperation.

Professional

orientated

Intermediaries

For the effective functioning of these entities is necessary

New institutional environment:

institutions to support their own technology development lines, infrastructure

including research and development, testing and testing;

Collective

Uses

Centers

Forms

Contract Manufacturing and Technology

research implementation and public-private partnership (including agreements between the Government of the Russian Federation and leading companies);

activities,

Integration

the institute of "qualified customer", including general designers and design bureaus, forming a technical task for research and development for further implementation of their results in production and technological processes;

digital platforms and information services to ensure

network interaction of subjects of technological development;

elimination of regulatory barriers, primarily in terms of turnover

results of intellectual activity and protection of investors’ rights;

the system of "growing" small technology companies as

forms of capitalization of knowledge (ideas).

It is also necessary to ensure

Technology

development,

The Creators

Launch of new tools effect

"pulling"

21

and accelerating the development of priority tools will be:

Technology. Key

industrial mega-projects aimed at bringing the created technologies to the markets,

large ones implemented on the principles of public-private partnership;

High-tech lines of our own

Liner Usage

products, development

Implementation

Best

Program

technologies using high-tech products of own lines of technology development; agreements

companies-leaders and the Government of the Russian Federation for the development of high-tech product lines based on critical and end-to-end technologies;

Affordable

large-scale research projects on the priorities of technological sovereignty (on lists of critical and cross-cutting technologies), including applied research.

The role of the state in ensuring technological development in the new

Technological development is increasing.

Main functions of the state (state institutions)

The third stage is: strategic

list management establishment of technological priorities and taxonomy of projects of technological sovereignty;

Targeting, technology,

planning and

and through

Critically

establishment and provision of transparent and stable regulatory rules of behavior and interaction of subjects of technological development, motivating them to technological innovations;

financial support for private innovation projects, including public corporations

number of development institutions and companies with state participation;

State

order for fundamental and applied

research and development, priority technological solutions;

acceptance of risks and part of costs in the implementation of individual

long-term non-recoverable innovative projects;

supporting the development of small technology companies; ensuring interaction with friendly countries in scientific

and technological areas;

development of the education system for the purpose of staffing

technological development;

22

development

applied infrastructure of fundamental research, including the base for testing prototypes.

and

IV. Principles, goals and indicators of technological development

1. Principles of technological development

The development and implementation of the Concept is based on the principles that allow making management decisions taking into account the identified challenges and the current situation, as well as in a state of high uncertainty and possible lack of data for making such decisions. These principles are:

the principle of concentration, meaning the transition from the frontal movement on a wide range of challenges of scientific and technological development of the country to the prioritization of limited resources on the selected, in the tasks and mechanisms of their solution;

within the concept,

Numbers

the University of London

Prioritization of Private Initiative Support

cooperation between the state and business;

Principle of Reasonable Competition

- Promoting competition among producers of innovative products, encouraging competing technological solutions and teams, and the need to provide support through competitive procedures;

Ecosystems

the principle of integrity of the innovation cycle, providing for technological development, providing support measures within and ensuring “seamlessness” at all stages of creation and implementation of technologies from research and development to implementation in the real sector of the economy (transition to innovatively oriented economic growth);

Principle

Economic

Expediency

technological developments, providing a combination of efficiency (minimization of time and other resources for the implementation of technological efficiency of developments), technological developments) and efficiency (degree of achievement of the final goals of the activity). This principle may not apply to individual long-term non-payable projects;

Productivity

(Economic

the principle of recognition of the right to risk, allowing the possibility of failure to achieve the planned results of technological work,

23

including research work, provided that there is no intention of such failure.

2. Technological development objectives

The implementation of the Concept is aimed at creating technological conditions for the socio-economic development of the country in accordance with the national development goals of the Russian Federation up to 2030 and national interests.

Towards the end of the third decade XXI century Russian Federation

Must have:

own scientific, critical and cross-cutting technologies;

Personnel and

Technology

Base

companies, corporations and entrepreneurs that rely on

Innovative

activity,

high-intensity on a comfortable regulatory environment;

Sustainable

Production

Fast-growing

base of the national economy, ensuring the production of the necessary including nomenclatures of microelectronics and robotics, aerospace equipment, drones, medicines and medical equipment, telecommunications equipment and software, accelerators and detectors of charged particles.

products, high precision

High - Tech

(Russian

Chips,

By the year 2030, 3 key goals have been achieved. First objective

- Ensuring national control

Reproduction of critical and end-to-end technologies.

Critical technologies provide today’s solution of the most important production tasks to create systemically significant types of high-tech products. These include, in particular, industry technologies - technologies in the field of microelectronics, machine tool construction, bioengineering, material processing and others.

End-to-end technologies are promising technologies of intersectoral importance that determine the future appearance of the economy and individual industries in the medium term. These include technologies of artificial intelligence, new materials, quantum computing and communications, energy storage, communication systems, space systems.

The indicators for achieving this goal by the year 2030 are:

24

achieved level of technological sovereignty by type

products;

achieved level of development of critical and end-to-end technologies

(according to the established list);

reduction in the coefficient of technological dependence by 2,5 times; for growth

Research

Internal

Costs

Development

and

(in comparable prices) not less than 45 percent.

Second objective

- transition to innovatively oriented economic growth, strengthening the role of technology as a factor in the development of the economy and the social sphere.

Indicators of achievement of this objective 2030 The growth of innovation activity of organizations in 2,3 times; increase in innovation costs (in comparable prices)

1,5 times;

growth of innovative goods, works, services (in comparable terms)

prices) 1,9 times;

increase in the number of patent applications by 2,4 times; increase in the number of registered large technological

companies 5 times, including small - 2,3 times; tempo

increase

Private

growth of technology companies by 3 times. target

Third

Technology

-

Investments

the Small Town

security

Sustainable

operation and development of production systems.

The economic growth envisaged for the implementation of the national development goals of the Russian Federation by 2030 by at least 20 percent requires:

Recovery of production and technological chains through

deepening the localization of their main elements;

conducting

technological modernization of the production system of the economy, including through the introduction of the best global available competitiveness.

Support

Technology

For

Her

Indicators of achievement of this goal by 2030 are: growth of non-resource non-energy exports (in comparable terms)

prices) 1,5 times;

increase in the share of manufacturing organizations,

Implementing technological innovations, 1,6 times;

25

increasing the share of high-tech industrial products produced in the territory of the Russian Federation in the total consumption of such products to 75 percent;

Singularity

achievement

- produced using the best available technologies - up to 100 percent (on industrial facilities having a negative impact on the environment classified in category I).

goods,

Weight

Indicators of achievement of technological development goals, by

Years to 2030 The year is shown in Appendix No 1.

Specified

These are interconnected technological goals and achieving each of these goals is a prerequisite for achieving the remaining goals.

Development

Objectives

V. Mechanisms for the implementation of the goal "Ensuring national control over the reproduction of critical and end-to-end technologies"

1. Main provisions

Technological sovereignty, mainly secured by its own lines of technology development and implementation of projects in priority sectors of the economy, is achieved when 2 conditions are met:

in the field of critical technologies - establishment and maintenance

technological parity with the leading countries;

in the field of end-to-end technologies - achieving technological leadership by creating scientific and technological groundwork and the potential for their commercialization. Lists

Technology defines cross-cutting technological priorities for the activities of the subjects of technological development and all forms of state support.

Technology and

Critically

End-to-end

End-to-end

List

scientific and technological technological forecast (foresight) and is formed on the basis of transparent procedures established by the legislation of the Russian Federation. In the selection of technologies should participate the federal state scientific budget entrepreneurs. and

Educational

Associations

"Russian

Community,

Agency

Residing

Academy

science,''

the City

26

A preliminary list of end-to-end technologies of directions) is given in Annex No. 2.

(Technological

Critical production projects of high-tech products.

Technology is defined

Systemic

During the implementation of species

significant

2. Approaches to the formation of mechanisms to support technological innovations

Currently, about 200 tools support technological innovations, including research and development, are operating in the Russian Federation. Their inventory in terms of efficiency and effectiveness and subsequent reassessing to eliminate duplication, consolidation and focus on cross-cutting technology priorities are in place, which includes the following approaches.

The first approach is the formation of all forms of the state order for research and development (except for basic research) of cross-cutting should be carried out by technological priorities through:

Financial

Support

Selections

within

Base

the City

the University of London

research projects;

setting up key performance indicators and target indicators of scientific and technological projects to achieve technological development goals.

The result of applied research and development should be identified and formalized, including registered, the object of intellectual property (invention, database, the secret of production (know-how), etc.). The second approach

- change of general approaches to development

incentive mechanisms, which should include:

Increase the time needed to finance the development

highlighting their stages;

Allowing simultaneous inclusion in a project

at all levels of technology readiness;

support the creation and development of experimental and experimental research

simultaneously

Production

C

industrial and development;

27

encouragement and financing of parallel development lines

technologies and products of one purpose;

recognition of the possibility of suspending or closing projects in the case of realization of scientific and technological risks without applying sanctions against the developer;

Decline

within the framework of state support for certain complex and technologically risky research and development;

Co-Finance

Requirements

the City Council

the University of London

to reduce the requirements for developers and future manufacturers to guarantee the sale of new products with a long development horizon;

Encouraging the transfer and introduction of technologies and products to competing producers

Development

own for the deployment of serial productions;

Lines

implementation

Principles

Customer-centricity

and

Simplification

administration of support measures based on digitalization of processes;

creation and development of a navigator of support measures on the principle of one

windows for all possible recipients of support in the field of innovation.

The third approach involves

creation of new markets for high-tech promotion of fundamentally new products produced on the basis of end-to-end technologies, and development of business models through the launch of a number of lighthouse projects. Up to 2030 Beacon projects in the field of commercial cargo unmanned transportation in the Russian Federation will be completed 3 environments (air, auto, water), medicine based on data processing, development of electric transport.

Species

The fourth approach is aimed at overcoming technological barriers that impede the development of new markets created by the use of end-to-end technologies, based on the launch and development of a system of open technological competitions, including within the framework of the National Technology Initiative.

3. Creation of new forms of integration of research and production and technological activities

In order to achieve the integrity of the innovation cycle, a number of measures will be implemented in the main areas of technological priorities aimed at strengthening the organizational integration of research and production and technological activities, in particular the following activities:

and

28

assistance in the creation of associations, including educational, research, production components, with the involvement of technological startups (in the image of technological holdings created by the Development Fund of the Center for the Development and Commercialization of New Technologies (Skolkovo Foundation);

R&D

and

modernization of mechanisms of existing programs and projects of full innovation cycle (the most important innovative projects of national importance, federal scientific and technical programs, complex scientific and technical programs and projects of full innovation cycle), providing for the integration of research and production, which consists in radical simplification and acceleration of procedures for their launch and implementation on the basis of clear technical and economic criteria for selection, focusing on technological priorities;

high-tech products based on end-to-end technologies within the framework of implementing agreements with the Government of the Russian Federation, including taking into account the development of research and training in relevant areas. The first 12 such agreements have been concluded and implemented since 2022;

Leading Companies

Linek

(by

"new

Sample

Directions

security),

Unifying

deployment of software research organizations, development and implementation structures, private industrial partners in each of the priority technological areas (critical technologies) of the network of industrial centers of industrial competence. The task of such centers is to provide serial high-tech competitive products by the forces of industrial partners. It is also planned to expand the list and programs of activities of the competence centers of the National Technological Initiative on the basis of educational institutions of higher education and scientific organizations implementing programs for the development of end-to-end technologies in partnership with major technology companies;

Release

creation of legal and organizational foundations for the functioning of the institute of chief designers and chief technologists in the areas of critical and end-to-end technologies. Such an institution should be established in each state corporation and companies with state participation, as well as in large private companies that support the development of the state.

29

appropriate technological directions. In addition, it is necessary to create an institute for the training and development of chief designers of scientific and technological, and engineering product-oriented groups;

Executives

and technologists,

scientific,

End-to-end

Technology. Provided for

reassembling and reloading the programs of innovative development of state corporations and companies with state participation, that is, their focus on the development and implementation of critical and the creation of a mechanism to stimulate state support for technological innovations in accordance with the established priorities of state corporations and companies with state participation;

State budgetary institution "Russian Academy of Sciences" scientific councils in priority areas of critical and end-to-end technologies. Their function is goal-setting, monitoring and conducting expertise of scientific research in the interests of technological development. Such councils should include chief designers and chief technologists in relevant technological areas;

Formation

System

the University of London

and

For

Terms and Conditions

creation

Developments

Use

infrastructure,

educational organizations of higher education and scientific organizations for research belonging to production companies, including data centers, test stands;

Creation of research consortia in the field of research and development in order to implement large-scale innovative projects. Establishing a new organizational and legal form in the legislation of the Russian Federation - a research consortium;

promotion

Legal

Terms and Conditions

and

creation of experimental zones (territories) for working out new organizational and legal forms, regulatory and financial mechanisms for the purpose of developing and introducing fundamentally new technologies;

Focusing of the program of strategic academic leadership "Priority of critical and cross-cutting technologies, commercialization of intellectual activity results;

Development

Implementation

2030"

the City

and

strengthening the role of key educational organizations of higher drivers of educational organizations of technological development by supplementing functions in the field of

Scientific

Quality

and

the University of London

30

research and experimental production, including through:

development,

R&D

and

Works

expansion of the network of engineering centers and technology transfer centers on the basis of educational institutions of higher education and scientific organizations, taking into account the current and future needs for the localization of certain types of industries and technologies;

Scientific

Associations

business in national laboratories and (or) research consortia, responsible for the implementation of complex innovative projects;

Organizations

Participation

the University of London

development of scientific expertise of research and development and evaluation of the expected economic efficiency of their expected results;

Creation

partnerships of modern world-class campuses as a new type of infrastructure and environment for solving the problems of technological development of the country.

Public-Private

Base

the City

4. Training and competence development based on long-term motivation

At the previous stages of technological development in the Russian Federation, the prestige of professions related to science was largely lost, which led to an increase in personnel shortages in the field of technology, engineering, physics and mathematics and in general throughout the spectrum of natural sciences, including in connection with the “brain drain” abroad.

Alongside restoring the prestige of science and overcoming “staff shortages”, an equally important task is developing “soft skills and competencies”, including the training of leaders of technology projects. These matters are discussed in section VI of the Concept.

Entrepreneurship. These

Technology

In order to fill the emerging gaps and focus the training system on technological priorities, the following activities will be implemented:

clarification of educational programs of secondary vocational and higher education, including ensuring compliance of subjects, structure and results of development of educational programs with a set of competencies required for solving the problems of development of critical and cross-cutting technologies. Development on an ongoing basis

31

and implementation of educational programs with a practice-oriented approach, involving the management of projects of the full life cycle of products, including stages from idea to commercialization;

monitoring and forecasting of the labor market and employment structure on professional positions related to the development of critical and end-to-end technologies, including an assessment of the need for specialists and the level of necessary professional competencies for the subsequent adaptation of educational programs;

support for the creation of new and existing research teams, young scientists engaged in research and development in the field of critical and end-to-end technologies in the framework of the implementation of projects on the basis of scientific research on educational education and scientific organizations;

State

Organizations

Higher Education

Linking initiatives to ensure a “seamless” personnel transition of their participants from the stage of launching projects aimed at the development of end-to-end technologies to their implementation in production and technological chains:

Involvement of students of higher educational institutions "Platform

in the activities of the federal project of education of university technological entrepreneurship";

creation of scientific laboratories under the leadership of young promising researchers in order to develop technological hypotheses;

support of leading scientists and scientific schools involved

development

development of critical and end-to-end technologies; advanced

ensuring the need for engineering personnel for the development of critical and end-to-end technologies;

Engineering Schools,

Popularization

and

Support

programs

Additional

vocational education;

replicating the best results of the creation of "digital departments"

in higher education organizations;

ensuring the accessibility of digital educational content

platforms for educators and students;

Scholarships

higher education institutions in the field of critical and cross-cutting technologies;

Students

Support

32

creation of STEM-learning centers (STEM), designed to develop the knowledge and competencies of the population in the field of natural sciences, as well as the competencies of technology, engineering and mathematics, in the production of products, at all levels of education. Development of advanced engineering schools;

A

Professional Industries

and high-tech

development of the Olympic movement and competitions, championships of the working number of professions in joint youth technological accelerators, startup studios and case championships on solving practical scientific and technological problems in order to introduce competitive teaching methods and improve the quality of talent search and development;

craftsmanship, industry,

Tom

the University of London

support for postgraduate programs and launch of internship system for young scientists in leading companies and technology companies;

launch of a system of technological internships for young employees in leading companies and acceleration of joint technological teams from among employees, students and postgraduates of higher education and scientific organizations;

support by technology companies to create basic departments of applied orientation and (or) development of educational programs in educational organizations in the areas of technological priorities.

5. Setting up of innovative development institutions

The activities of innovation development institutions for the development and implementation of critical and end-to-end technologies will be built taking into account:

the existing portfolio of innovative projects, competencies of employees and departments of the Institute of Innovative Development, as well as available expertise that provides the necessary quality of decisions and assessment of the potential to provide a significant contribution to the development and implementation of technologies that meet technological priorities;

Promising demand for products brought to market in the framework of innovative projects and technological projects

33

sovereignty from both industrial customers and end users.

In order to adjust the system of innovation development institutions for the implementation of projects in accordance with technological priorities, the following activities will be implemented:

participation as a financial investor in the formation of

technological holdings;

normative

securing rules for supporting innovative projects and projects of technological sovereignty, including managing the increased risk of investment in technology companies, taking into account data on the projected return on investment in these companies, applying a portfolio approach to the assessment of investment efficiency (estimating the result across the totality of implemented projects, regardless of possible negative results for individual projects);

Quotation of the amount of funds allocated to support innovative projects and projects of technological sovereignty in the total amount of financial resources;

development and implementation of a line of financial instruments to support all stages of the innovation cycle, taking into account the specific characteristics of customers (tech companies);

implementation

Adaptive management and financing aimed at minimizing risks by reducing the development of technology or products to a series of short cycles;

Mechanisms

Flexible

Creating long-term models of motivation for end-to-end management

Linked institutions are the results of supported innovation projects.

Innovation

development,

C

VI. Mechanisms for the implementation of the goal "Transition to innovatively oriented economic growth, strengthening the role of technology as a factor in the development of the economy and the social sphere"

1. General

In developed countries of the world, the production of value added and the growth of the value of companies occurs mainly technology. introduction for competitiveness is determined by their innovation activity.

and companies

Capitalization

Many

New

account

the University

34

To strengthen the role of technology as a factor in the development of the economic and social spheres and increase the level of innovation activity in the Russian Federation, it will be necessary:

removing regulatory barriers to technological innovation and the intellectual property market, including legal protection of developers, entrepreneurs and investors;

Encouraging the expansion of domestic innovation markets

products (supply and demand);

creating conditions for the growth of small technology companies, significant barriers for which are the underdevelopment of the venture capital market, low availability of financing for technology companies, as well as the problems of entry of technology companies into domestic and foreign markets.

2. Removing regulatory barriers to technological innovation and the intellectual property market

In order to stimulate the turnover of the results of intellectual activity and reduce the administrative burden on technology companies, the following activities will be implemented:

introduction of the principle of "right to risk" - presumption of good faith of officials in case of failure to achieve the planned results of an innovative project, including using budget funds, funds of companies with state participation, state corporations and institutions of innovative development;

creation

creation of a mechanism for competition of technological solutions based on the principle of "right to risk", including in the formation of a portfolio of projects of innovation development institutions; commercialization

results of intellectual market liquidity. To this end, mechanisms for assessing rights to intellectual property objects will be developed, including for the purpose of securing rights to them and subsequent implementation;

Tools of activity

by raising them

the use in some cases of mechanisms for compulsory licensing of the results of intellectual activity, the exclusive rights to which belong to right holders from unfriendly countries;

Unused

Relation

the University of London

35

Creation of an Institute of Credit secured by Intellectual Property

property;

optimization of preferential tax conditions for increasing the turnover of rights to intellectual property and stimulating research, development and technological works, including the introduction of a "patent box" regime - a regime of reduced taxation on profit from turnover of rights to intellectual property, the abolition of taxation on value-added transactions with rights to all types of intellectual property, the abolition of contributions to extrabudgetary funds from intellectual activity, a gradual increase (up to 3-x) a factor that allows to write off the costs of research, development and technological work at cost, if the development is ordered by the business from scientific organizations and educational institutions of higher education to improve the administration of the provision of these tax benefits, including in terms of applying an increasing cost factor for research, development and technological work;

Rewards

results

Service

products,

Creation

New

Objectives

the National Park

the University of London

between

Settlement

Legal Relations

rights holders and the state in relation to the results of intellectual activity necessary for state and municipal needs, created by organizations on an initiative basis at their own expense, including the establishment of the price of acquiring rights to such results of intellectual activity (both rights of use and exclusive rights);

Simplification of the procedure for the transfer of results of intellectual activity between the defense and civil spheres in both directions;

and

Scientific

Scientific

Educative

removal of barriers in the transfer of rights to the results of intellectual organizations of activities in the commercial sector, including the creation of small innovative enterprises by educational organizations of higher education, as well as the authors of inventions;

provisions on the conditions that allow authors of inventions to dispose of the objects of intellectual property created by them, in intellectual documents (policies,

Organizations

Regulation

regulations,

inclusions

order)

Regions

and

the University of London

36

property of scientific and educational organizations of higher education;

elimination of tax restrictions when using the investment partnership agreement as a tool for attracting venture deferred taxation;

financing,

Mechanism

including

providing the possibility of establishing experimental legal regimes in certain areas of technological innovations that are not digital innovations;

in order to simplify the procedure and increase the transparency of transactions with intellectual property rights - the development of interdepartmental data exchange of state registers in terms of data entry on intellectual property rights;

changing the jurisdiction of economic (property) disputes in relation to the rights to the results of intellectual activity - transfer from courts of general jurisdiction to arbitration courts;

development of the procedure for management of tangible assets (including material carriers of information on the results of intellectual activity, prototypes and test stands) created within the framework of research and development for the purposes of state order;

adaptation of the sphere of intellectual property of new subjects of the Russian Federation to the Russian legislation, including persons, preferential status living in new subjects of the Russian Federation.

Attorneys

Patents

receiving

3. Stimulating the expansion of markets for domestic innovative products

The key condition for a significant expansion of innovative product markets is increased competition in technologically developed sectors of the economy, including taking into account the import of technological products from friendly countries. In this regard, the Government of the Russian Federation will consistently increase efforts to combat market monopolization and support private initiative. A set of legislative measures (“the fifth antimonopoly package”) aimed at developing competition in digital markets will be adopted and implemented. Antimonopoly programs will be developed for other markets of high-tech products and services.

37

However, it is not enough to rely solely on market forces that generate demand for innovation through competition. In order to supply and demand Russian incentives for the expansion of innovative products, the state also needs to support the growth of the technological development ecosystem and ensure the implementation of a number of targeted measures.

4. Stimulating supply and demand

due to

Low demand for domestic innovative products is largely related to the integration of the Russian economy into global production chains. In addition, a key role is played by numerous regulatory restrictions leading to higher prices and the extension of the timing of the release of high-tech products.

Structural factors,

and

Volume

Low

Production

Insufficient

The level of competitiveness of domestic high-tech products is largely due to the unwillingness of companies and corporations to invest in long-term innovative projects, including research and development, in order to produce and market new high-tech products. In the most developed countries, the share of total research and development funding is 80 percent, while in the Russian Federation it is about 30 percent. The motivation of companies and corporations to invest in research and development largely depends on the availability of sources of long-term financing, the effectiveness of research and development, the convenience of practical testing of the technological solutions being created, as well as reducing the time for their implementation.

weight of business

Sectors

Creating conditions

Incentive

Domestic mechanisms:

Innovation

Products

Supply and Demand Support

will be

optimization of the standardization system in order to stimulate technological innovations based on their own technology development lines;

Introduction of the mechanism

procurement of certain types (normatives) of high-tech products created on the basis of their own technology development lines by state corporations and companies

38

with state participation (taking into account the quality and price of these products). This requirement can be introduced by rebooting the existing mechanism of innovative development programs;

Requirements

Establishment

domestic to innovative products in the formation of large investment, including infrastructure projects with state participation and (or) with state support;

Use

creation of digital platforms (marketplaces) for interaction

large customers and developers of high-tech products;

creation of special mechanisms for financial support of purchases of products of national treatment requirements for suppliers

High - Tech

National

(leasing) taking into account from friendly countries;

development and implementation of special mechanisms (tools)

support of export of high-tech products;

development of preferential regimes in certain territories, including the legal regime of innovative scientific and technological centers, including optimization of their number and unification of the composition and rules of the provided privileges and preferences;

creation or adaptation of special debt and equity financial instruments and providing them with sources of financing for the development of fast-growing technology companies;

creation of landfill infrastructure, enlarged and pilot plants for testing new technological solutions in real operation;

formation and use, including in determining the rules for concessional financing of investment projects, of sectoral requirements for enterprises under construction, providing for the creation of experimental workshops, sites for pilot implementation and other infrastructure solutions;

creation of mechanisms and tools for preferential long-term (with going beyond the budget cycle) financing of long-term research and development projects for the benefit of production companies that stimulate the commercialization of the created results of intellectual activity;

39

changing the dividend policy of companies with state participation to maintain additional sources of financing long-term investments in research and development;

creation of a preferential leasing mechanism for production

constructions and buildings by analogy with the conditions of industrial mortgage;

creation and development of a network of regional development institutions providing support and financing of production projects of project financing companies. Long-term and concessional sources of financing will be provided for such development institutions;

Technology

Mode

the University of London

Creation of special mechanisms to support and increase the Russian

competitiveness of production when it is implemented in an unregulated market segment;

Innovation

Products

creation

Mechanisms

investors to create infrastructure in areas with preferential regimes, on the basis of which critical and end-to-end technologies are created.

Incentive

5. Infrastructure and personnel

In the Russian Federation, there is practically no infrastructure for technology transfer, which ensures the transformation of technologies into real production forces.

To this end, the following activities will be implemented: the creation of technology exchanges that ensure the commercial circulation of patented results of intellectual activity, including industrial designs;

creation

Industrial

demonstration areas of research,

development of the results of development and technological works that ensure the transformation of secured legal activities into existing production. Such demonstration zones will be created, including within the framework of innovative scientific and technological centers;

Intellectual Property

Results

Security Guard

the Interregional Network of Technology Transfer Centers

according to a single standard and rules of interaction;

40

creation of a network of funds for the commercialization of research and development results, including those developed within the framework of the state order for research and development.

Special attention is required to the development of competencies and skills necessary to increase the innovative activity of ownership of the development of organizations, and technological entrepreneurship.

Intellectual Property

Market

In the sphere of turnover of rights to the results of intellectual activity, there is an acute shortage of qualified personnel. At the same time, it is necessary to solve separately the issues of personnel support in the field of intellectual rights in courts and law enforcement agencies.

Also, special attention is required to develop the competencies and skills necessary to ensure the leadership of technological projects, their structuring, promotion and financing. The following activities will be aimed at developing these competencies and skills:

promotion

Qualifying

employees of educational institutions of higher education on the protection, protection and commercialization of rights to the results of intellectual activity;

Pedagogy

Selection

admission to higher education organizations providing training in the field of intellectual property;

Additional

Control

Numbers

study

High School

Supplementing the school curriculum with related disciplines

on intellectual property; (or) educational programs expansion of the network of departments and with institutes of technological entrepreneurship of innovative companies. Providing relevant educational programs in open access through digital platforms;

Jointly Technological

Questions,

development,

inclusion in educational programs in the field of finance, economics and management of a complex of educational subjects aimed at the development of venture financing, risk management of technological projects;

Expansion of additional

(optional, selective) for middle and high school students to obtain knowledge from institutes

Technological Entrepreneurship

Opportunities

About

41

innovative development, successful entrepreneurs and employees of venture funds.

6. Creating conditions for the growth of small technology companies

In order to ensure the accelerated development of small technology companies and attract private investment in capital and projects with their participation, as well as the use of the opportunities of the technological development ecosystem, the following activities will be implemented:

Fixation

normative

technology company" and the creation of a register of small technology companies in order to create a "window" for large investors and focus on government support measures;

Concepts

"small

creation of preferential regimes for small technological administrative

special tax and

including

companies, regulation;

Technology

creation of a mechanism for seamless integration of existing measures to support innovation development institutions, providing for the formation of a single information environment, ensuring mutual recognition of the results of the innovation project examination by innovation development institutions;

Companies

Sides

the City

development

Special Forces

investment financing of small technology companies, including crowd platforms and the institute of business angels, endowment funds (trust funds);

Mechanisms

creation

(development) of special financial support tools for small technology companies in order to refine products and technologies to the requirements of large customers, as well as increasing the availability of credit products for the commercialization of development results and technological works;

research,

creation

(scaling)

(exchanges of small capacity companies) to the production facilities of large companies for the organization of pilot and experimental productions;

Technology

Digital

Platforms

Access

the City Council

expansion of mechanisms for supporting youth technological involvement of schoolchildren

Entrepreneurship. Development

42

and young people in technological projects that have the potential to create small technology companies, including in the framework of the “circle” movement of the National Technological Initiative, the All-Russian schoolchildren of the “National Technological Olympiad”;

Interdisciplinary

Olympiads

Events

development of the system of acceleration of technological teams, including the implementation of the "Platform of Federal University Technological Entrepreneurship", the use of services and various forms of practice-oriented education created and implemented for existing and potential participants of the National Technological Initiative (National Network Accelerator, design and educational intensives, etc.);

Project

Step-by-step implementation of special labour regulation regimes

for certain categories of personnel of small technology companies.

VII. Mechanisms for the implementation of the goal "Technological support for the sustainable functioning and development of production systems"

1. General

The implementation of this goal is the 3 integral component of ensuring the technological development of the country in the specific conditions of challenges and restrictions 2023 - 2030. Its achievement will create a powerful “focused” impulse of demand for innovative technologies from the real sector of the economy and at the same time will provide domestic wide withdrawal of high-tech goods and services.

Line

Markets

the City

Saving

The medium-term development of production systems (2023 - 2030) will be achieved through the following mechanisms:

Functioning

Sustainable

and

implementation of the best available technologies and improvement of

Resource efficiency of enterprises;

implementation of the largest projects for the production of certain types (mega-projects) using

high-tech products of own lines of technology development;

import substitution

Broad

Nomenclature

Products

and component products.

43

2. Implementation of the best available technologies and improvement of resource efficiency of enterprises

Sectors

Implementation

Affordable

Economics

Best

Technology

Justified

Aims of increase

is aimed at technological modernization of industry and other resource industries in real efficiency and reducing the negative impact on the environment. The implementation of the best available technologies is implemented through the production and establishment of technological processes in information and technical directories containing information for an informed choice of alternatives by the end of 2024, industrial facilities that have the greatest negative impact on the environment must comply with the best available technologies or the necessary modernization must be started on them.

Technology

Technical

Requirements

and

C

This will be achieved through the implementation of the following activities: updating the directories of the best available technologies of high-tech products,

c and use of domestic relevant best world practices;

Necessity

Domestic

Implementation

Accounting

establishment of preferential tax regimes for domestic enterprises implementing the best available technologies, including through the introduction of increasing coefficients of accelerated depreciation of equipment and the use of special investment contracts;

creation of favorable conditions for attracting long-term loan financing in projects of modernization of enterprises with the use of the best available technologies;

establishment of requirements for resource and energy efficiency of enterprises when concluding special investment contracts, providing subsidies and other measures of state financial support for enterprises and individual projects.

3. Implementation of the largest projects for the production of certain types of high-tech products

Sustainable socio-economic development of the country, preservation and development of production and technological potential in the conditions of sanctions pressure from unfriendly countries

44

Human Resources

All and

technological,

the Russian Federation

It requires the availability of production and financial opportunities for the production of high-quality high-tech products that meet the basic needs of the economy and society. We are talking about the implementation of major projects (mega-projects) for the production of lines of new complex equipment, mobile equipment and medicines in industries such as aviation and shipbuilding, electronic and radio-electronic industry, engine building, railway and transport engineering, machine tool manufacturing, pharmaceutical and medical industry, etc.

mechanical engineering,

heavy

Production and operation of such products taking into account the requirements of quality, price and speed of market launch is possible only within the framework of public-private approach under the following conditions:

Partnerships

Project Management

and

a private partner (including state corporations) performs the functions of a customer, determining the parameters of quality and prices, concluding a long-term contract (contract for a future thing) with the company - the main executor;

the company - the main contractor forms a cooperation network and determines the necessary directions of research, development and technological work, using the mechanism of the cluster investment platform and other measures of state support;

State

creates maximum

conditions for the implementation of this agreement within the existing support mechanisms and instruments. In addition, the state provides the necessary research and personnel support for the mega-project.

Favorable

In the years 2023 - 2030, the implementation of at least 15 mega-projects, primarily in these industries, will be launched

10 industry.

Thus, the mechanism for the implementation of mega-projects includes: the definition of an anchor customer providing long-term demand for products and monitoring compliance with technological, economic and temporary conditions of its production;

45

Definition

forming production and technological cooperation with the support of the state;

the executor,

Main

Conclusion of a long-term contract - a contract for a future thing

at least 5 years;

determination of forms and methods of research and scientific and technological support of a mega-project, including in the form of a state order for research and development;

provision of training of workers and engineering personnel; application of state support mechanisms, including special investment contracts, protection and promotion of investment, cluster investment platform; assistance from the state in attracting for implementation

Agreements on

mega-project of long-term borrowed funds on preferential terms.

systems,

The priority mega-projects should be the production of a range of civil aircraft, including unmanned medium-air and high-speed diesel engines, machine tools and robotics, equipment for the production of liquefied natural gas, turbines, and pharmaceutical microelectronics, low-tonnage substances.

Production

development

Chemistry

and

4. Import substitution of a wide range of products and components

There is an urgent need to deploy

own production of final products, components and raw materials for those types that fell under sanctions. Such productions will be created both on the basis of localization mechanisms and on the basis of such own lines of development of the order of production 300 - 400 items. Import substitution

Technology. Nomenclature

Industry

Nomenclature

Products

covers

Broad

Industries

the University of London

and components will be provided by:

formation and approval of the list of products, components and raw materials that require localization taking into account the requirements of unification and standardization;

46

deployment of necessary research, development and technological works, including in the framework of reverse engineering;

Launch of information service

(platforms) search for services of development companies in accordance with the requests of industrial enterprises providing a product localization program;

the Development Institutes for Development

production in accordance with the list of localized products;

Using an Industrial Mortgage Tool to Create

new productions within the framework of the product localization program.

The implementation of import substitution programs will require re-equipment of reverse engineering centers with special devices and installations, as well as staffing in the field of engineering professions.

VIII. Support of priority projects in key sectors of the economy (technological sovereignty projects)

Achieving all 3 goals of technological development requires an integrated, systematic approach to the organization of the innovation cycle. The concentration of efforts only at its individual stages - research and development, the organization of pilot production and the creation of product samples, entering serial production - creates gaps, and therefore risks in the holistic system of ensuring the technological development of the country. In this regard, it is necessary to create conditions for the implementation of domestic projects of a full innovation cycle on the basis of its own lines of technology development.

An integrated approach to the organization of a full innovation cycle will be implemented by deploying and supporting priority projects of technological sovereignty in key sectors of the economy. It is preferable that such projects include:

coverage of the entire research and development cycle, the production of prototypes and the creation of serial production using critical and end-to-end technologies;

creation of services for the use (operation) of products

throughout its life cycle;

personnel support of development, production and operation of products in terms of research, engineering (designers and technologists) and working professions. The importance of

47

use of the best world practices in the training of personnel, including those obtained through participation in international competitions in professional skills;

the regulation of such products, including

Technical Regulation and Standardization.

If these conditions are met, specific projects will be able to have the status of projects of technological sovereignty. Confirmation of this conformity will be carried out within the framework of an independent examination.

About

Terms

Relating

In order to establish the requirements and criteria for projects of technological sovereignty, the taxonomy of projects of technological sovereignty is normatively fixed by a decree of the Government of the Russian Federation 15 April 2023 № 603 On approval of priority areas of projects of technological sovereignty and projects of structural adaptation of the economy of the Russian Federation and the Regulations on projects of technological sovereignty and projects of structural adaptation of the economy of the Russian Federation, on the submission of information on projects of technological sovereignty and projects of structural adaptation of the economy of the Russian Federation and the maintenance of a register of these projects, as well as on requirements for organizations authorized to submit opinions on requirements to projects of technological sovereignty and projects of structural adaptation of the economy of projects, the Federation.

Conformity of Projects

Russian

Implementation

projects

C

IX. The role of the Russian Federation in accelerating the technological development of the country

Role and list of functions of the subjects of the Russian Federation in the new

Technological development is increasing.

K

Main Functions

Subjects of Russian Federation

Accelerating technological development includes:

Formation of research and production clusters around leading

Engineering higher education institutions;

48

deployment of necessary infrastructure - industrial technologies

polygons,

Transfer

Centers

parks, and engineering services;

Experienced

Support for small and medium-sized technology companies, including regional financial support measures and creation of preferential conditions for their activities;

support for the development of various forms of combining scientific, technological and production activities, including technological holdings with the participation of regional industrial partners (investors);

programs, including on the basis of a guaranteed regional state order. At the same time, the subjects of the Russian Federation can often perform the function of a qualified customer in the field of research and development;

Science and Technology

own

Creation of

territories of subjects of the Russian Federation of innovative scientific and technological centers and other forms of preferential regimes for technological development;

training of engineers and workers, including in the framework of

Secondary vocational education.

X. International scientific and technical cooperation of the Russian Federation

Despite sanctions, the Russian Federation remains a deeply integrated economy in the system of international division of labor. At the same time, the system of restrictions that have arisen requires a change in the priorities and vectors of international scientific and technical cooperation. Key

Cooperation of the Russian Federation in the field of scientific and technological development will be: strengthening multilateral sustainable ties with friendly countries in the field of joint creation and development of new technologies and markets for high-tech products;

International

Results

increase in the number of critical and end-to-end technologies localized in the Russian Federation, created within the framework of cooperation with friendly countries;

49

creation of international (cross-border) mechanisms to support the creation and implementation of technological innovations of economies in the interests of the Russian Federation and national friendly countries;

Simple

and organizations

Transparent High

System

Participation of Education and Scientific Companies

Technology

educational research in international programs and projects;

organizations,

creating conditions for growing technology companies -

world leaders.

multilateral

The organization of international projects will realize the scientific and technical potential and innovative cooperation within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Organization of BRICS countries, the Regional Commonwealth in the field of communications, as well as the potential of the Union State of the Russian Federation bilateral with friendly states.

cooperation,

Scientifically,

Connections

and

International

Cooperation covers

key areas such as joint production and development, development of international cross-border exports, development of human resources and attracting specialists.

Regulatory cooperation and

cooperation,

Base

For the purpose of joint production and development is provided

implementation of the following activities:

creation and development of international networks of scientific, scientific, technical and innovative cooperation, as well as industrial cooperation (contract manufacturing);

Support

technologies and high-tech products with the subsequent localization of production in the developing countries;

Joint

Developments

attracting foreign partners from friendly countries to participate in organized forms of technology development and development in the Russian Federation (agreements on the development of end-to-end technologies, mega-projects, innovative joint project teams, etc.);

Science and Technology

Centres,

Formation and development of international direct

and venture investments.

50

In order to develop an international regulatory framework for cooperation

The following activities are envisaged:

ensuring access of Russian software developers to global open source repositories and creating national repositories with access to them by developers from other countries;

development of the legal and regulatory framework of international scientific and technical cooperation and industrial cooperation of the Russian Federation and partner states, including the development of standards and regulations for interaction;

development of support system for domestic technology companies in the field of intellectual property rights protection in foreign jurisdictions;

Standardization of conformity assessment systems of Russian products

Federation and friendly countries.

For the development of cross-border cooperation and exports

The following activities are envisaged:

creation and development of cross-border technological platforms,

including contractual development platforms;

support for the export of high-tech products, including

services, to promising world markets; centers

Deployment

Network

Transboundary

Transfer

technologies;

Formation

Industrial

Zones

the City Council

Production

high-tech products in friendly countries.

In order to develop human resources and attract specialists

The following activities are envisaged:

creation and development of international scientific and technological centers of competence, centers of collective use of scientific equipment, technoparks, spaces of collective work;

support for the formation of foreign branches and joint education

Organizations

Higher Education

laboratories of educational and scientific organizations in friendly countries;

joint training of scientific and engineering personnel; implementation of programs of international educational and scientific academic mobility, including for graduate students, young specialists and scientists;

51

development of forms

“ Digital

Residency »

-

Attraction

foreign specialists and companies for technology development;

removal of regulatory barriers, including in the field of migration, labor and tax legislation, to attract specialists from abroad.

XI. Management of technological development (functional model)

Meta Processes

The management system should ensure the achievement of the goal of managing technological activities 2 and production and technological activities. In order to ensure an integrated approach to the formation of a management system, a functional model needs to be described.

the Research Foundation

Development -

Integration

the City

The functions of the management system can be divided into the following:

Groups:

strategic management; operational management (execution); monitoring and control. Strategic management provides: forecast of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation for the long term in conjunction with the forecast of socio-economic development;

the general goal of scientific and technological development in the framework of the Strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation, approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 1 December 2016 No 642 "On the Strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation", in conjunction with national development goals;

definition of technological priorities; definition of the main directions of international scientific research;

technical interaction.

Operating

mechanisms and tools of technological development, specified in sections V - IX of the Concept, which are implemented within the framework of:

) provides

Management

The Unified Plan for the Achievement of the National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2024 and for the Planning Period up to 2030, approved by the Government of the Russian Federation

52

the Federation 1 October 2021 № 2765-p, in terms of fulfilling the tasks of technological development; functional

as state development, state program of economic development and innovative economy, program of development of digital economy, programs of development institutions;

Science and Technology

Tools

management,

programme

such

Sectoral Government Programs and Corporate Programs

and projects that include scientific and technological sections;

Projects and programs of structural development

- agreements on the development of end-to-end technologies, beacons projects, advanced engineering schools and others;

Regulatory Reference Information Management

and

Best

Critically

Taxonomy of Technology Sovereignty Projects). Monitoring and control provides for: monitoring the implementation of projects and programs

End-to-end

(definition of technologies, formation of technologies, formation of

the University of London

within

State automated management system; and critical

Technology

Products

Development

Levels

monitoring of high-tech technologies;

the City Council

Production through and

scientific and technical expertise and evaluation of results in the field of research and development, including with the involvement of the federal state budgetary institution "Russian Academy of Sciences";

statistical

security

Monitoring

Technology

development and innovation.

____________

Annex No. 1 to the Concept of technological development for the period up to 2030

TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES INDICATORS

Name of indicator

Unit of measurement

Evaluation 2022 year 2023 year 2024 year 2025 year 2026 year 2027 year 2028 year 2029 year 2030 year

Forecast

Note

Indicators of achievement of the goal "Ensuring national control over the reproduction of critical and end-to-end technologies"

1.

2.

Achieved level of technological sovereignty by types of products

Achieved level of development of critical and end-to-end technologies (in accordance with the established list)

3.

Technology dependency ratio

interest

68,7

68,3

66,7

56,5

47,5

40,9

35,9

32

development of a methodology for calculating the indicator is required

27,3 Switzerland: 2021 - 89,5; USA: 2021 - 51,9; China: 2021 - 23

4.

5.

Growth rate of domestic research and development costs (in comparable prices, to the level of 2022)

The share of innovative goods, works, services in the total volume of goods shipped, works performed, services

interest

100

107,5

109,2

115,8

121,4

127,3

133,4

139,8

146,3

interest

5,2

5,2

5,3

5,8

6,2

6,7

7,1

7,6

8

Germany - 14; Italy - 13,5; Portugal - 14,5; France - 6,2

2

Name of indicator

Unit of measurement

Evaluation 2022 year 2023 year 2024 year 2025 year 2026 year 2027 year 2028 year 2029 year 2030 year

Forecast

Note

6.

7.

8.

9.

Indicators of achievement of the goal "Transition to innovatively oriented economic growth, strengthening the role of technology as a factor in the development of the economy and the social sphere"

The level of innovation activity of organizations

interest

11,9

12,1

12,4

13,9

15,7

17,8

20,3

23,2

27

The growth rate of innovation costs (in comparable prices, to the level of 2022 years) The growth rate of innovative goods, works, services (in comparable prices, to the level of 2022 years)

The growth rate of innovative goods, works, services of small technology companies (in comparable prices, to the level of 2022 years)

interest

100

101

103,1

114,7

123,1

131,6

138,8

146

153,1

interest

100

101

104,2

117

129,4

142,4

156,2

170,9

186,3

interest

100

102

107,9

132,1

152,6

175,8

194,9

212,5

228,3

10. Number of small technology companies

More of them with more revenue 2 billion roubles

11. Growth rate of investment in small

technology companies (in comparable prices, to the level of 2022)

Thousands of units

units

interest

8,9

28

100

9,1

29

103

9,5

32

10,1

42

12,1

58

14,1

78

16

98

18

120

20

144

111,9

148,5

170,3

214,5

243,4

270,2

294,2

12. Number of patent applications for inventions

Thousands of units

28,1

28,3

28,9

34,2

40,7

47,2

53,7

60,3

66,9

Germany - 68,8; Italy - 55,7; Portugal - 51,1; France - 54,8

development of a methodology for calculating the indicator is required

and utility models filed by Russian applicants in the Russian Federation and abroad under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Indicators of achievement of the goal "Technological support of sustainable functioning and development of production systems"

13. Growth rate of non-resource

interest

100

93,8

97,8

114,8

120

126,2

132,7

139,3

146,8

non-energy exports (in comparable prices, to the level of 2022)

3

Name of indicator

Unit of measurement

Evaluation 2022 year 2023 year 2024 year 2025 year 2026 year 2027 year 2028 year 2029 year 2030 year

Forecast

Note

14. The proportion of manufacturing organizations that implement technological innovations

interest

29

29,5

30

31,8

33,9

36,3

38,8

41,6

45

development of a methodology for calculating the indicator is required

15. Specific weight of high-tech

interest

56,1

58,4

60,8

63,3

65,5

68,1

70,5

72,6

75

industrial products produced in the territory of the Russian Federation, in the total consumption of such products in the Russian Federation

16. Proportion of goods produced

interest

2

15

90

90

91

91

92

94

99

on industrial facilities with negative impact on the environment classified in category I, confirming the use of the best available technologies in the total volume of shipped goods produced at industrial facilities with negative impact on the environment classified in category I

____________

Annex No. 2 to the Concept of technological development for the period up to 2030

PROVISIONAL LIST

End-to-end technologies (technological directions)

Data processing and transmission technologies

Artificial intelligence, including machine learning technologies

and cognitive technologies

Technologies of storage and analysis of big data Technologies of distributed registries Neurotechnology,

Virtual

Technology

and

Augmented

Realities

Quantum computing Quantum communications New industrial and system-wide software Geodata and geoinformation technologies Technologies of trusted interaction Modern and prospective mobile communication networks

Energy technologies

Technologies of electric power transportation and distributed

Smart Power Systems

Energy storage systems Hydrogen energy development

New production technologies

Technologies of robotics and mechatronics components Microelectronics and photonics

2

Technologies of new materials and substances, their modeling

and Development

Biotechnology and technology of living systems

Technologies for controlling the properties of biological objects Molecular engineering in life sciences Bionic engineering in medicine Accelerated development of genetic technologies

Technologies to reduce anthropogenic impact

Advanced Space Systems and Services

____________

Project materials · Full published text

University Project on SPECZASHCHITA Letterhead

Source status: Project

A university project on SPECZASHCHITA letterhead — a proposed educational initiative.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/proekt-universiteta-na-blanke-spetszaschity-2.html

Open on the site

Non-profit Consumer Cooperative "Scientific and Production Association"SPECZASHCHITA" (NPK "NPO "SPECZASHCHITA") Legal Address: 109004, Moscow, st. Stanislavsky, house 22, Page. 2, Pom. 11 Actual address and address for correspondence: 109004, Moscow, st. Stanislavsky, house 22, Page. 2, Pom. 11 Site: https://nposz.ru E-mail: info@nposz.ru Tel. +7(499) 649-51-21 OGRN 1207700383087, INN 9709066128, KPP 770901001

"26" 02. 2026 City No 144-441 on 2026-2029 Mr. NON-COMMERCIAL HUMANITARIAN PROJECT Noospheric University"

CONTENTS OF PROJECT MATERIALS

Introduction: Page. 1-2 Why Noosphere? p. 3 Because it teaches the Knowledge of the Inclusiveness of Being! p. 4-6 Based on the Inviolable Laws page. 6-16 Based on the Rhythms of Integrity in the Cycles of Genesis p. 17-31 Harmonious Relationship Unity Page. 32-42 Worldview Levels Page. 43-48 Evolution of the Universe Page. 49 Is there a direct analogy between the development of the System, the Planet, Man and Atom? p. 50-63 Basic Postulates Page. 64-68 Ether Spaces Page. 69-72 Space, Time, Mind, Causes of Being, Seven Eternities. 73-81 _________________________________________________________________________________ WORLDWIDE Noospheric University Page. 82

• Statutory provision: "MANIFEST NOOSPHERES"; • Aim of education:

Establishing the Planetary Mind of Galactic Culture;

Channel 10 – Utopia Vision Page. 83-90 Founders of Page. 91-106 The Board of Trustees. 107-116 The Supervisory Board. 117-176 NOOSPHERE. 177-230 Departments:

a. Psychology. b. Astronomy. c. Physiology. g. Metaphysics. d. Anthropology. e. Astrology. Geometry. p. Mystics. i. Symbolism, c. Numerology.

"The seven keys reveal the secrets, past and future, of the seven great indigenous races and the seven kalpas." Subjects

A single fundamental school can be recognized by some characteristic features: By the fundamental nature of the presented truths embodied in the following:

Postulates:

a. The unity of life. b. The gradual development of the individual, a sequential course of learning in which one moves from one expansion of consciousness to another until reaching what is called perfection.

c. The sevenfold relationship between microcosm and macrocosm. The method of development and the place of the microcosm within the macrocosm, which is opened up through the study of the periodicity of all manifestations and the basic law of cause and effect.

Secondly, it is a consistent scientific study of the microcosm, including the study of

The following items using a microscope, if necessary:

Microcosm

a. Elementary anatomy, physiology, biology. b. Ethnology. c. Study of the etheric body and related vitality and magnetism. The study of geology, the plant kingdom (botany) and the animal kingdom. The study of human history and the development of science. Study of the laws of the microcosm.

Macrocosm

a. The study of the laws of electricity, fohat, prana, and astral light. Study of Astronomy and Astrology. c. The study of occult cosmogony. The study of human hierarchy. d. The study of the deva of evolution. e. Studying the laws of the solar system. The study of telepathy, mental creative process, psychometry.

Mind

a. The study of the mental plan. b. The Laws of Fire. c. Study of the Causal Body. The fifth principle. d. Study of color and sound.

Synthesis

a. Study of spirit-matter-mind. b. Study of numbers and symbols. c. Studying Higher Mathematics. Study of the laws of unity. d. Studying the laws of gender.

Mental development

a. The study of practical occultism. b. Study of Psychics. c. The study of astral light and akashic records. The study of mediumship and inspiration. d. Study of past lives. The study of macrocosmic and microcosmic centers.

Practical work a. Service to Race. b. Study group work. c. Retrospective view. 330] Work on subtle bodies in order to acquire continuity of consciousness. The study of magic. Study of the Seventh Ray

The transformation of opportunities in ability The third type of work is based on the described curriculum and consists in direct individual development. It covers the following actions:

a. Alignment of bodies for the purpose of egoic touch. b. Building antahkarana and development of the higher mind. c. The development of intuition and the concrete spiritual awakening of the student. Study of its vibration, ray, color and tone. d. Conscious cleansing of all bodies, starting with the physical.

The faculties of Seven are united under the following names:

1. Field of evolution. 2. Evolution of Substance. 3. Evolution of form or group evolution. 4. Evolution of man, thinker. 5. Evolution of Consciousness. 6. Purpose of evolution. 7. Space evolution.

These chapters discuss the scientifically based relationship between matter and consciousness, which is strengthened as evolution alternately affects the atomic substance of all forms, subjective and objective. The purpose of the lectures is to provide "scientific evidence" of the existence of this connection and "show listeners the identical manifestations of this connection and some basic laws in successively increasing states of being, in order to lead to an understanding of the universality of the evolutionary process and its relevance."

Annexes: 2025 Mr. The Mayan Factor 9- a summer vision card; The Law of Thought; Master Plan for the Establishment of Galactic Culture Seven postulates of the Galactic Operating System; The RINRI Project, Tom 1,2, 3 –What is the Cube Matrix 441?; The One Mind Galactic Culture Chronicle Space History Tom 1,2,3,4,5,6,7; TELEKTON 7:7:7:7 – Revelation of Telektonon DRIMSPEL Time and Technosphere; The earth is rising; Altai and Ancient Maya; 12 Lessons of Wisdom + A library consisting of 350 the Founders ’ Writings, 250 The book covers more than one subject, and a library of 15 000 Works on illuminated issues written during the past Epoch Textbook, workbook

Place of position; Republic of Altai Mountain

WHY NOOSPHERE?

BECAUSE IT TEACHES THE KNOWLEDGE OF ALL THE HOSPITALITY OF BEING!

EXPERIENCED INTO INDEPENDENT LAWS

EXPERIENCE RHYTHM OF WHOLENESS IN THE CYCLES OF BEING

UNITY OF HARMONIC RELATION 34560

Every situation that we have considered so far creates its own special case. But in addition to the above facts, it should be remembered that we are dealing with a single system of spherical vibrations (pulsations), behaving in accordance with simple musical (harmonic) principles. If we had to prove the accuracy of such a model, we should have discovered the harmonic cohesion that persists throughout the universe. If each object of matter-energy is formed by a liquid “ether” from the Great Central Vibrator, then there must be a single musical relation that forms a “universal connection” throughout the known Universe, at all levels of size.

Controversial physicist Ray Toomes has proposed a vital new model that combines the entire puzzle with the science of harmonics or musical vibrations. As we have already said, the Great Central Sun continues its rhythmic movement, creating intersecting wave pulsations following the laws of music and vibration. In the Universe there are spherical-thorough energy formations of various sizes - the moon, planets, the Sun, the galaxy and the Universe itself.

Surprisingly, Toomes discovered that in the universe, the average distances between all spherical energy formations at each size level are precisely interconnected through a simple musical relationship — 34560.

• If we take the average distance between the moons and multiply it by 34560, we

We get the average distance between the planets.

• If we take the average distance between the planets and multiply it by 34560,

We get the average distance between the stars.

• Multiply the average distance between the stars by 34560, You will get an average

distance between galaxies.

• Take the average distance between galaxies and multiply it by 34560, and you

Get the size of the known universe.

This suggests that the Cosmos is inherent in a “fractal organization”. This means that we have what is called “self-similarity at all levels.” Geometric formations created by fractal mathematics can grow exponentially. And no matter how small the education you portray as “close-up”, all the time you will see the same geometric structures. Many theories of Chaos have already recognized that in many strange and mysterious ways the universe itself works according to this logic.

Surprisingly, as you can see from the diagram below, the same harmonic

The ratio 34560 in space can expand or decrease.

• Reduce the average distance between the moons by two multipliers 34560 and you

get the average distance between cells, both plants and animals.

• Reduce the average distance between cells by 34560, You will get an average

distance between atoms.

• Reduce the average distance between atoms by 34560, and you get the average distance between nucleons - the smallest natural "particles" in the Universe.

Figure 7.5 Ray Toums: Discovery of a single ratio of 34560 in the Universe

The above diagram shows the total of all links, demonstrating that all

The universe is interconnected through one vast unified plan.

It is incredible that such a simple system works so well at the quantum level, and at the level of a living cell, and at the level of a supergalactic, without requiring any contractions or mathematical-magical transforming corrections, trick-pocus. [Example of such a "correction": before Copernicus placed the Sun in the center of the Solar system, to mathematically explain the "retrograde" (reverse) motion of the planet.

Research in traditional science, therefore, immediately dismissed the objection of skeptics that Tomes “fabricated the reporting”. He was simply the first person to discover that each of the different classes of spherical energy forms is shared and interconnected through a simple basic harmonic relationship. As soon as we add to this new findings of quantum physics, we, of course, notice the completeness and completeness of the model.

Moreover, the usefulness of the relationship 34560 It is not limited to the remarkable facts that we have just noted. Other forms of aether vibrations, such as the difference between the speed of light and other major vibration/pulsation speeds, also exhibit a major harmonic 34560. Such evidence is found in the work of Dan Winter, who went further in the study of the connections discovered by Toomes. As one harmonic example from Winter's work: the speed of light in water is approximately exactly equal to the speed of light in vacuum, and ? is the standard musical relationship between the two vibration frequencies. Here is something even more interesting: • Reduce the speed of light 34560, and you will get the speed of sound. • Reduce the speed of sound 34560. and you will get the speed of distribution

Heat.

This, of course, illustrates a very simple concept: the speed of light is by no means the highest speed in the universe, as we have already discussed. It is simply the highest speed at which energy can move through the ether in our local region of density. Other regions of greater density would permit a higher speed of light, as Kozyrev observed in his torsion-wave fields. In The Shift of the Ages, we presented Bruce Cathie’s detailed evidence that the speed of light is a perfect harmonic value. First, to measure time, Cathie used what he called a “grid second”. This unit is shorter than a second, but closely related to it. It is based on a system of 9 rather than 8—that is, 8 х 3 = 24 hours; 9 х 3 = 27 “grid” hours. Cathie showed that Earth’s harmonic measurements, such as a nautical mile corresponding to one minute of one degree at the equator, provide a perfect harmonic measure for understanding and measuring universal energy. Remember that the Earth must have formed according to harmonic principles, so this is no coincidence. Thus, when Cathie calculated the speed of light as the number of nautical miles light would travel in a vacuum during a grid second, he obtained exactly 144,000! 144 is the square of 12 and a significant number in the science of musical vibrations.

Moreover, the work of Lembert Dolphin and Barry Setterfield convincingly proves that the measured speed of light has been constantly reduced by a small amount since the moment when it was first calculated. This discovery was the result of a rigorous analysis of literally every study related to the speed of light, made up to 1980. We believe that the measured drop in the speed of light is due to the energy strength of the boundary we are now facing as we prepare to move into the higher ether density region in the galaxy. This is the main theme of this book. A

Now it should simply be remembered that the speed of light directly correlates with the speed of sound and the speed of heat propagation through the same universal harmonic ratio 34560.

If we want to investigate the likelihood of finding a relationship 34560 When discussing the density of matter, we will need to consider cubic harmonics, that is, harmonics 34560 Third degree, because in this case we are dealing with three-dimensional structures instead of two-dimensional distances between them. With this in mind, when we consider the densities of matter in the universe, the following interesting relationships emerge:

• Reduce the density of ordinary matter by 345603 and you get the density

neutron star, which is considered the densest object in the universe.

• Reduce the density of ordinary matter by 345603 x 2, and you get the density of the known Universe - predominantly what is now called "empty" space.

All the observations of Tomes and Winter only reinforce the idea that in the Universal Sphere the central vibrator creates ripples throughout the ether. All pulsations are exact harmonic multipliers of the time interval of a second, or greater or lesser time intervals, and their initial harmonic wavelengths are ratios of 34560.

Toomes demonstrated that the distance between stars and planets can be determined by other harmonic relations, in addition to 34560, but the ratio 34560, of course, is the most predominant. His research includes a complete definition that all nearby stars are in exact harmonic relationships with each other in terms of relative distances.

The concept of a central vibrator also offers an explanation for why aether waves are observed as spirals in Kozyrev’s experiments. Wherever we are within the sphere of the Universe, aether energy will constantly be engaged in more than one kind of motion: the outward and inward pulsations of the central vibrator, and the rotation of the sphere itself. These motions are repeated at every scale throughout the Universe. Thus, whenever a wave is created in the aether medium, it will move in a spiral, following the geometry of the intersecting motions.

However, in the solar system, we have a great opportunity to fully study the system of the Central Vibrator. The whole mechanism was outlined in Oliver Crane's work: and it was only reinforced by the work of Ray Tomes and especially J. B. Stoneking in his "Theory of the Stoneking Resonance". The first acquaintance with the mystery begins with the discovery of E. D. Titius (1766), in 1772 published by J. I. Bode and known as “Bode’s Law”. This finding reveals that the positions of the planets are determined according to regular musical intervals.

And even more surprising: now we know that the Sun, undoubtedly, is the central vibrator. In 1962 R. Leighton and his colleagues found that

The surface of the sun pulses regularly. In the early 70-ies, several groups from America, Russia and the UK confirmed that the Sun does vibrate with steady pulsations, its surface rises and falls about three kilometers. Pulsation occurs in different harmonic intervals of the main unit of time - exactly 5 minutes, no more and no less, and reaches a maximum value of 160 minutes. The fact that the Sun has an accurate five-minute beat indicates that the Central Vibrator in the Universe is pulsating in perfect multipliers of one second. It is for this reason that we call the second the “Universal Quantity of Time.”

All doubts about this effect disappeared when a team of French, Russian and American scientists gathered at the south pole in Antarctica to observe and measure the Sun for five consecutive days. In the last days December the south pole is illuminated by the Sun 24 hours. It never “enters” in this place. With exceptionally good weather, hour after hour, they observed a 160-minute period of fluctuation and a three-kilometer amplitude.

Figure 7.6 and 7.7 Stoneking resonance affecting the positions of internal and

the Solar System 's

The above schemes are borrowed from the work of Stoneking. They show

The waves created by the Sun’s pulsation and how they position the planets.

In his 1998 article, Stoneking calculates the wavelengths generated by the Sun’s different harmonic intervals, such as the five-minute, ten-minute, 80-minute and 160-minute pulsations, and so on. These wavelengths would be measured at some distance from the Sun. Calculating wavelengths is a simple mathematical problem involving the distance the Sun’s surface moves with each pulsation (2–3 km), the time taken by each pulsation (five-minute intervals), and the wave’s speed of travel, that is, the speed of light (300,000 km/sec).

When Stoneking performed these calculations, he found that at each end of the calculated wavelengths is a planet, which can be clearly seen in the drawings. The “nodes” of wavelengths are the zones of least pressure where all vibrations mutually extinguish and allow the formation of planets. Moreover, the entire heliosphere formed by the Sun's magnetic field is exactly five 160-minute pulsations.

Figure 7.8 Stoneking's resonance in the outer solar system

Moreover, Stoneking discovered that each planet is located in a specific exact number of solar diameters from the Sun. Each planetary orbit fits exactly into one of the "pitches" created by the pulsation of the Sun in the ether, for it resonates like a giant drum. The above diagram shows that only the outer planets are aligned with the diameter of the Sun, but it is not made to scale. In fact, the diameter of the Sun is slightly smaller than the 160-minute pulsation. The harmonious connection between the planets’ positions provides reliable scientific data on which Oliver Crane is based in his article “The Central Vibrator”.

The Great Constant of Nineveh was found on Sumerian clay tablets. It was deciphered by NASA astrophysicist Maurice Chatelain, who worked on enormous orbital calculations for the Apollo mission. The Great Constant of Nineveh shows that all planetary orbits are exact subdivisions of one master cycle. This cycle is expressed as a number of seconds: 70 multiplied by 60 seven times, or (70 х 60)7. Every known body in our solar system has a whole number of orbital cycles within this master number expressed in seconds. A simple analogy for each planet would be twelve eggs fitting perfectly into a tray. Likewise, a certain number of cycles of each planetary orbit fits perfectly into the Great Constant of Nineveh, without a single second left over. For example, according to the Great Constant of Nineveh, Pluto has 25,000 cycles and Halley’s Comet 81,000 cycles. Roughly speaking, the Great Constant of Nineveh spans about 6.2 million years. In turn, the Great Constant itself is a subharmonic of even larger numbers recorded in the Mayan Codices.

Wilcock’s Constant harmoniously links all the orbits of every object in the entire galaxy, just as Nineveh’s Great Constant unites the entire solar system. This number is exactly 0,7, Nine times multiplied by 60 or (0,7 x 60)9. This is the exact duration in seconds of the true time it takes for the galaxy to rotate around the axis. This number is only slightly smaller than the generally accepted number 225 Millions of years ago (roughly speaking) 223,5 millions of years. Moreover, Constant Wilcock is exactly in 36 More than the Great Constant of Nineveh. It is very likely that further discoveries will confirm that this Galactic Constant is the main cycle of all planetary systems. Such discoveries will be made through the technology of space travel with superluminal speed, which is already available, and the theoretical basis of which is presented in the previous book.

The Universal Constant was first introduced in the work of Dr. Henry B. Myers. Detailed mathematical analysis led to the conclusion that the entire Universal Sphere makes one complete revolution, which is a complete life cycle. Myers' calculations combined scientific knowledge with the ancient Hindu Vedas and showed that the true age cycle of the universe is very close in duration to the 120 Wilcock's constants or, roughly speaking 25 billion 820 millions of years. Myers estimated that we are now

We are only in the middle of the cycle. Also, his work suggests that ancient Vedic astronomers knew this cycle well.

10-33(Quantum level 10+28 (METAGALACTICS)

WHERE ALL THE DIAPASON OF HUMAN PERCEPTION COMPOSITES

0.03 Micron

1 Forms. 1. Divine thought passes from the abstract to the concrete or visible form. The objective is the emanation of the subjective. D., I, 407. b. Impulse is the spiritual energy that causes objectivity. D., I,

349,)

c. The Logos gives objectivity to the hidden thought. D., II, 28) 2. In order for any form of energy to become objective, three components are required (T. D., I, 89): a. Lack of separation. Initial impulse. Energy. Will. b. Form is quality, or shape. Nature. Love. c. Matter is an objective sphere. The active mind. (see. T. D., III, 561). 3. Life precedes form. D., 242) a. The thinker always remains. D., II, 28) b. The power of life is the transformation of the thought of the Logos into energy. (III,179) 4. Spirit develops through form and out of form. D., I, 680) a. The spirit must attain full self-consciousness. D., I, 215) b. Form sharpens the spirit. (T. D., II, 775) c. The principle of limitation is a form. D., III, 561) Mr. The Spirit fills all the shells. D., I, 669, Note) d. The Spirit passes through the cycle of Being. (T. D., I, 160) 5. The devas are the source of form. D., I, 488) They exist in two large groups: a. Ahhi is the vehicle of divine thought. D., I, 70) b. The Host of the Voice. (T. D., I, 124) They are a collection of substances

Four higher and three lower planes.

6. There is a form that unites all forms. D., I, 77, 118) This form is the totality of the whole manifested or the entire solar sphere, or system. It contains: a. Ten planetary schemes with everything in them; b. All smaller interplanetary bodies; c. Virgo and human evolution; The kingdoms of nature are everywhere; d. Involutionary and Evolutionary Gods; e. Every atom of substance on every plane. 7. All forms are periodically destroyed. Read carefully (T. D., I, 397-401.)

EVOLUTION OF THE UNIVERSE

Entity

Explorer

Centre

Space

Time

Unknown

7 Constellations

Space Logos

5 Space Plans

Space Logos

Solar Logos

7 Solar Systems

7 Planetary Circuits

Solar Logos

4 Space Plans

Heavenly Man

3 Space Plans

Heavenly Man

7 Planetary Circuits

Chohans and Groups

2 Space Plans

Period of Three Solar Systems

Period of one solar system

Person

7 Air Centers

Principle

1 Space Plan

Period of one planetary scheme

Is there a direct analogy between development?

Systems, Planets, Man and Atom? If this question is dictated by the desire to confirm the exact similarity, then the answer should be: no, the analogy is never accurate in detail, but only in certain explicit basic correspondences. Indisputable similarities are found in all four subjects of consideration, however, if you look at them from the point of view of a person in three worlds, limited in their perception, in the details of the stage of evolutionary growth may not seem the same. If we take the atom on the physical plane as a starting point and develop the idea of similarity from stage to stage, then the similarities between all four can be described as follows:

Atom 1 (a) An atom consists of a spheroidal form containing the nucleus of life within itself.

1 The Secret Doctrine says about the atom: 1. Through each atom, the absolute intelligence vibrates. (T.D., I, 298) 2. Where there is an atom of matter, there is life. D., I, 245, 269, 279) 3. The atom is a concrete manifestation of Universal Energy. D., I, 201) 4. The same invisible life forms atoms, etc. D., I, 281) 5. Every atom in the universe has a potential self-awareness.

(T. D., I, 132; II, 742)

6. Atoms and souls are synonyms in the Initiate language. D., I, 620, 622) 7. The atom belongs entirely to the field of metaphysics. (p. D., I, 559) 8. God is within every atom. D., I, 89, 183) 9. Every atom is doomed to perpetual modification. (T. D., I, 167)

10. The purpose of the evolution of the atom is Man. D., I, 206) 11. In the center of every atom there is an embryo. D., 1, 87; II, 622) 12. There is heat in every atom. D., I, 112) 13. Each atom has seven planes of being. D., I, 174) 14. Atoms are vibrations. (T.D., I, 694)

b) The atom contains changing molecules within itself, which together form the atom itself. The physical atom contains fourteen billion archetypal atoms, but these myriads manifest as one.

(c) The atom is characterized by activity and demonstrates the qualities of:

- Rotational movement; - Ability to distinguish; - Ability to develop.

The atom, we are told, contains within itself three major large spirillas and seven smaller ones 2 - all ten are in the process of being revived, but have not yet reached full activity. At this stage, only four are functioning, and the fifth is in the process of development.

e) The atom is governed by the Law of Economy, with the atom slowly coming under the influence

The Law of Attraction will eventually come under the control of the Law of Synthesis.

e) The atom is found in all forms; it is the aggregate of atoms that forms the form. g) Its response to external stimulation is as follows:

- Electrical stimulation affects his objective form. - Magnetic stimulation affects his subjective life.

The combined effect of both stimulations causes its internal growth and development. Therefore, the atom is distinguished by the following signs:

1. Spheroidal form. His "ring-not-crime" is definitely and apparently 2. Internal device that determines the scope of each specific

Atom.

3. Life activity, or the degree to which life in the center animates this activity.

atom; at the present stage it is a rather relative concept.

4. Sevenfold internal structure in the process of evolution. 5. Final internal synthesis of seven in three. 6. Contact with your group. 7. Develop your consciousness or response.

By listing the distinctive features of the atom in this way, we can now try

to extend them to humans, following the same general scheme:

Man is spheroidal in form, he can be seen as a spherical “ring-not-crime”, as a sphere of matter with the core of life in the center. When we say this, we mean, of course, the true man in his fundamental state — that is, the Ego with its sphere of manifestation, the causal body — that body which forms the middle point between Spirit and matter.

b) Man is composed of various atoms, which together form the objective form of man on the planes of his manifestation. They are all animated by his Life, by his persistent will to be; they are all vibrating, and the speed of vibration depends on the stage that man has reached in the course of evolution. If we consider a person from the higher planes, he is seen as a sphere (or spheres) of diverse matter, vibrating in a certain tact, painted in a certain color, rotating in accordance with a specific key - the key of his life cycle.

c) A person is characterized by activity on one or more planes in three worlds and manifests

the following qualities:

1. Rotational motion, or its special rotation in the wheel of life around its

The selfish pole.

2. The ability to distinguish, or the ability to choose and gain experience; 3. The ability to develop, increase vibration and establish contact.

A person has three main principles: Will, Love, Wisdom, Active Intelligence, or the ability to adapt, and they are divided into seven principles. Forming in the end a dozen perfect manifestations, they are in the process of reviving, and have not yet reached

2 Ch. Leadbeater, "Inner Life", II, c. 177-179. “Occult Chemistry, c. 22, Annex II and III. Babbitt, "Principles of Light and Color. c.

97-101.

full expression. There are only four principles active in man today, and he is in the process of developing a fifth, or Manasic, principle. Note how accurate the analogy is between a person considered as the lower quaternary and developing the principle of intelligence, and an atom with four active spirillas and a fifth in the process of stimulation.

e) Man is governed by the Law of Attraction, develops through the Law of Economy and begins to pass under the control of the Law of Synthesis. Economy governs a material process with which man is not too consciously connected; attraction determines his relations with other units or groups, and synthesis is the law of his inner self, Life within form.

A person finds his place within the group form. Selfish Groups and Celestial People

are aggregates composed of human and deva units. g) Human response to external stimulation is as follows: 1) Electrical stimulation affects the external form; it is a pranic response. 2) Magnetic stimulation affects his subjective life. This stimulation emanates from his egoistic group, and later from the Celestial Man, in whose body a person is only a cell.

3) The combined effect of these two stimulations causes its constant growth and

development.

Thus, a person is characterized by:

1. Spheroidal base form. His "ring-not-crime" is definitely and apparently 2. The internal structure; the whole sphere of human influence is in the process of development. Currently, this area is limited, the range of its activity is small. As the egoic body develops, the central core of Life increases the radius of control until the whole person comes under its control.

3. activity, or the extent to which it is currently

Self-consciousness, or governs its trinity of lower nature.

4. Sevenfold internal structure, the development of its seven principles.

5. Final and occurring under the action of three laws internal synthesis of seven

Three, and then one.

6. Group communication. 7. development of consciousness, response to contact, including, therefore,

Increased awareness.

Celestial Man.3

a) Every Heavenly Man can also be seen as a spheroidal form. He, like the atom and man, has his own "ring-not-crimes." This "ring-not-crime" includes all

3 Heavenly people are: 1. The Body of Consciousness (T. D., I, 626). 2. Creators (T.D., I, 477, 481-485; cf.: T. D., II, 244).

a. They are the seven primary creations which have assumed the etheric form of the Heavenly Man. They are the seven secondary creatures who have taken on a dense physical body. Trace this to the Microcosm, as well as the work of dev ethers to build a body.

c. The aggregates of divine intelligence (T.D., I, 488). The Mind-Born Sons of Brahma (T.D., I, 493; II, 610). They are the Logoic Quaterner, the Five, and the Seven.

d. The Seven Rays (T. D., I, 561, II, 201.

They are the seven ways to return to God. Spirit. Metaphysically, they are the seven principles. Physically, they are seven races.

e. Lord of infinite and untiring devotion. D., II, 92). Failure to implement the previous system (T. D., II, 243. p. Polar Opposites of the Pleiades (T. D., II, 579, 582.

Our system is male in occult terms, and the Pleiades are female. In the same way, Heavenly Man creates in his planetary scheme. (T.D., II, 626).

The dense physical globe of any chain in his case is an analogue of the physical body of man and the atom on the physical plane. Each scheme of the seven chains is an expression of the life of the Entity that uses it, just as a person uses his body for the purpose of manifestation and experience. b) The Celestial Man contains in himself what corresponds to the cells in the vehicles of expression of the human being. The atoms, or cells, of the body of the Celestial Man are a collection of devas and human units that vibrate on his main note and respond to the rhythm of his life. They are all held together and animated by his will to exist, and all vibrate according to the point of evolution he has reached. From space, Heavenly Man can be seen as a sphere of wonderful life, including within the radius of its influence the vibrating volume of the entire planetary scheme. It vibrates at a certain rate, on a certain note, which is determined by the activity of life pulsing in the center of the sphere; the entire planetary scheme is colored with a certain color and rotates according to a set key, which is the key of its life cycle in an even larger Mahamanvantara, or logoic cycle.

c) Every Heavenly Man is distinguished by his activity on one or another of the planes, called Triads, or Atma-Buddhi-Manas, just as men are distinguished by activity on one of the planes in the three worlds: mental, astral, physical. Man eventually becomes self-aware at all three. Ultimately, Heavenly Man becomes fully self-conscious on the three higher planes. Each movement forward, or increase in vitality in the aggregate of people in the three worlds, is accompanied by similar activity on the three higher planes. The action and interaction between the life that animates these groups, or Celestial People, and the life that animates atoms, or people that exist as units in these groups, is mysterious and surprising. On his own plans, Heavenly Man also manifests the following qualities:

Rotational motion, or special cyclical activity, around its wheel of life, planetary pattern, and therefore around its egoic pole. The ability to distinguish, or the ability to choose, and thereby gain experience. It is the manifestation of the manas, or mind (hence their name "Divine Manasaputras"), which allows you to understand, choose and discard, thereby acquiring knowledge and self-awareness. This manasic ability they developed in previous kalpas, or solar systems. Now they are trying to use what has been developed to implement certain effects and achieve special goals.

The ability to develop, increase vibration, acquire knowledge and make contact. The increase in vibration is achieved gradually, has an evolutionary character and goes from center to center, as it happens in humans and in the case of the development of atom’s spiritils. The goal of Heavenly People is to achieve a harmonious connection with each other and eventually merge their individual identities into a One Authenticity, while maintaining complete self-awareness, or individualized self-perception.

The Heavenly Man contains three main principles: Will, Love, Wisdom, and Intelligence, together with their manifestation through the seven principles so often discussed in our occult literature. They make up the ten of its ultimate perfection, for seven turns into three, and three into one.

Every Heavenly Man has, of course, his own basic color, or principle, as does man and the atom. Man has the same basic color, or principle, as the Celestial Man of whom he is a particle. He (like the Celestial Man) has two other main principles, forming a triple with the first, and their differentiation by seven, as mentioned earlier. The basic color, or principle, of the atom is the color, or principle, of the egoic Ray of that, for example, human being in whose body it is. It is the physical atom of the human body. This color manifests itself as a vibration, setting the rhythm of the three main and seven smaller spirillas.

So far, only four principles have been manifested in Heavenly Men, although One of the Heavenly Men has far surpassed the others and has an adequately vibrating fifth principle, while some others are only perfecting their fourth principle. The Heavenly Man of our chain responds in some way to the fifth principle, or rather, awakens him to life. His fourth vibration, or principle, is awakened in the present

The fourth circle, or cycle, on a given fourth globe, although it does not yet function as it will in the fifth circle. Many of the troubles that are occurring on our planet at the present time are due to the activation of the higher or fifth vibration, which will be fully manifested and transcended in the next or fifth cycle. Here, too, the analogy with man and the atom is preserved, although not in all the details.

e) The Celestial Man is governed by the Law of Attraction, transcends the Law of Economy, and is rapidly coming under the authority of the Law of Synthesis. Therefore, pay attention to the gradual increase in control, as well as the fact that:

1. The law of economy is the fundamental law of the atom. The law of attraction begins to control the atom. The life of the atom is only slightly felt by the Law of Synthesis. It is the law of life.

2. The law of attraction is the basic law of man. The law of economy is secondary to him and governs the matter of his conductors. The Law of Synthesis begins to be felt steadily.

3. The Law of Synthesis is the basic law of Heavenly Man. The Law of Attraction

Total power. The law of economy is transcendent.

For the Heavenly Man, the dense physical body is not a principle, and hence the Law of Economy is transcended. The material process of creating a form is governed by the Law of Attraction. The Law of Being of Heaven is the Law of Synthesis.

The Heavenly Man finds his place in the logical groups, trying to realize his

position among the seven and as a result approach unity.

Its response to external stimulation. From a human limited point

It is unfathomable to human intelligence, and is related to:

Electrical stimulation that deals with the response to solar radiation

and the planetary radiation existing in parallel with it. Magnetic stimulation that affects his subjective life. This radiation emanates from sources outside the system. We can note the following facts:

Magnetic stimulation of the physical atom emanates from the person on the astral

levels, and later, from the buddhic levels.

- Magnetic stimulation of man emanates from Heavenly People on Buddhic, and

later on the monadic levels.

The magnetic stimulation of the Celestial Man emanates from sources outside the System, from the Cosmic Astral, and the combined effect of these stimulations causes a steady internal development.

Thus, the Heavenly Man is different:

1. Spheroidal form. His "ring-no-crime" during his stay in

Objectivity is defined and visible.

2. The inner workings and sphere of its influence, or activity, which animates

planetary chain.

3. Spiritual management of life in any given period. This is the power by which He revives His septenary nature. Note the increase in its influence compared to the triple radius of human influence.

4. The final synthesis is seven in three, and then - in one. I mean the obscenity.

celestial bodies and the merging of the seven principles developed by each globe.

5. Evolution according to the Law and the development resulting from it. 6. Group communication. 7. Develop your consciousness and awareness.

And finally, we should extend what we have said to the Solar Logos and see how well the analogy is preserved. The words that describe stimulation,

The magnetic and the electric will inevitably lead us back to the reflections on the Fire, the basis and source of all Life.

Solar Logos (a) The solar Logos, the Great Man of Heaven, is also spheroidal in form. Its "ring-not-crime" includes the entire circumference of the solar system, everything that falls within the sphere of influence of the Sun. The Sun occupies a position similar to the nucleus of life at the center of the atom. This sphere includes seven planetary chains in its periphery, together with the synthesizing three, which is the ten of the logoic manifestation. The Sun is the physical body of the Solar Logos, its manifestation body, and its life circulates cyclically through the seven circuits, just as the life of the Planetary Logos circulates seven times around its seven-chain circuit. Each chain occupies a position similar to the globe of the planetary chain. Note the beauty of this correspondence, as well as the lack of detailed similarity.4

b) The Solar Logos contains within itself, as atoms of its body of manifestation, all the diversity of groups, from the involutional group soul to the egoic groups on the mental plane. He has (as the life-giving centers of his body) seven main groups, or seven Celestial Men, radiating their influence over all parts of the Logoic sphere and enclosing within Himself all the smaller lives, smaller groups, human and deva units, cells, atoms, and molecules.

When viewed from cosmic levels, the Logos sphere is seen as a vibrating fireball of divine glory, accommodating planetary spheres of influence, the same vibrating fireballs. The Great Man of Heaven vibrates with a constant increase in the rate of vibration; the whole System is colored in a certain color - the color of the Life of the Logos, the One Divine Ray; The system rotates at a certain speed, which corresponds to the key note of the Great Kalpa, or solar cycle, and also revolves around its Central Solar Pole.

The Solar Logos is characterized by its activity on all the planes of the Solar System. He is the sum total of all manifestations, from the lowest and densest physical atom to the most radiant and cosmically ethereal Dhyan Chohan. The total sevenfold vibration is the key to the lower cosmic plane, and its velocity, or rhythm, can be felt on the cosmic astral plane with a faint echo on the cosmic mental plane. Thus, the life of a logical existence on cosmic levels is similar to the life of a person in three worlds on the lowest of the system planes.

On its own plans, the Logos also demonstrates:

1. Rotating motion. His life, circulating during the day of Brahma, moves along

spirals on His great wheel, on the ten schemes of the solar system.

2. ability to distinguish. His first act, as we know, was to distinguish, or

choice, the matter necessary for manifestation. This choice was determined by: - Cosmic Karma; - Quality of vibration; - Color, or quality, of response; - Numerical factors associated with cosmic mathematics.

He is the embodiment of the Cosmic Manas, and, using this ability, He seeks - through the animated form - to enrich his cosmic causal body in parallel with the quality of Love-Wisdom.

3. The ability to progress, increase vibration and gain full self-awareness

Space Levels.

d) The Solar Logos contains three main principles or aspects and their differentiation into seven principles. They make up the top ten of his ultimate perfection and in the end

4 T. D. I, 136.

They are synthesized into a single perfect principle of Love-Wisdom. This final principle is its primary color. Each principle is embodied in one of the schemes and manifests itself through one of the Celestial People. So far, only four principles have been manifested to a certain extent, since the evolution of the Logos is parallel to the evolution of Heavenly People.

The solar Logos is governed by the Law of Synthesis and holds everything in synthetic unity, or homogeneity. His subjective life is governed by the Law of Attraction, and his material form by the Law of Economy. It comes under the control of a different cosmic law, which is still incomprehensible to humans, but is open to the highest initiates.

(e) The Solar Logos is in the process of figuring out its place in a larger System in which it occupies a position similar to that of the Celestial Man in the Solar System. He seeks, first, to reveal the secret of his own existence and achieve complete Self-consciousness; secondly, to determine the position and place of his polar opposite; thirdly, to unite and merge with this polar opposite. This is a cosmic marriage of Logos.

g) Each Solar Logos is distinguished by its response to external stimulation. This

related to:

By electrical stimulation, or His response to the electric phohatic force emanating from other stellar centers and largely controlling the activity of our System and its movement in space relative to other constellations.

By magnetic stimulation affecting His subjective life and emanating from certain cosmic centers hinted at in The Secret Doctrine. The source of their origin is at the cosmic buddhic levels.

The combined effect of these stimulations is what causes constant development. Solar Logos is characterized by:

1. The Spheroidality of His Manifested Existence. His solar "ring-no-crime" is definitely obvious. So far, this can only be detected by trying to establish redefining subjective control, as well as by measuring the solar sphere of influence, or the Sun's magnetic attraction to other, smaller bodies that it holds spinning around it.

2. The activity of life animating the ten circuits. 3. The degree of control that the Logos exerts in any given period. 4. The final connection of the seven schemes into three and then into one. This includes the obscenity

These are the seven principles that they represent.

5. Subjection to the Law of His Being. 6. Contact my group. 7. The disclosure of one’s Consciousness, the time of which is determined by the measure of the disclosure of all

conscious units in his body.

Here, we have traced some of the analogies between the four previously mentioned factors very briefly and have answered the questions briefly. Reflection on this information can be of real help to the student in understanding the subject and comprehending the beauty of the entire solar scheme.

There are three important questions that can be considered one, since they all belong to one subject and are connected with the fact of the existence of objectivity itself, endowed with intelligence. Probably, the problem will not seem so complicated if you paraphrase this triple question and ask it, referring to microcosmic objectivity. It can be expressed as follows:

What is the thinking aspect of a human being? Why His Mind and Mental Process

So important? Who is the Thinker?

Man is essentially a higher triad, manifesting through a gradually developing form, the egoic or causal body, and using the lower trinity as a personality.

A means of contact on the lower three planes. The purpose of all this manifestation is the development of perfect self-awareness. Above the Triad is the Monad, or Father in Heaven, which from the physical plane is seen by man as a point of abstraction. The Monad is in the position of the Absolute in the same sense in which the undifferentiated Logos refers to the Trinity, to the three Persons of the Logoic manifestation. It's a perfectly accurate match.

1. Monad. 2. The Triad of Atma-Buddhi-Manas, or spiritual will, intuition, and the higher mind.

3. The egoic, or causal, body, is the place for the manifestation of the buddhic principle. This

The body must be built by the power of the mind. It is a manifestation of three.

4. The triple lower nature, the point of the most dense objectivity. 5. The triple lower nature is, in fact, the quaternary, the etheric vehicle that gives life to life, or prana, kama-manas, and the lower mind. Manas, or the fifth principle, creates a connection between the lower and the higher.5

Thus we have: the lower four, the higher three, and the connection between them is the principle of mind. Seven here is formed as a result of the combination of three and four, and another factor gives eight. The final seven will be seen after Buddhi and Manas are joined. In some of our occult books there have been many hints of the eighth sphere. I would say that in this connecting factor of the thinking mind lies the key to the mystery. When the mind develops excessively and ceases to connect the higher and the lower, it forms its own sphere. This is the greatest misfortune that can befall a human unit. Thus, we have:

Monad, microcosmic absolute. Pure Spirit. One and only. The Monadic Trinity.

The first aspect ........................ Atma, or spiritual Will. The second aspect ........................ Buddhi, or the principle of Christ. The third aspect ........................ Manas, or the Supreme Mind.

The aspect of the Son in objectivity The egoic or causal body. Lower quaternary.

1. The Mental Body. 2. Astral or emotional body.6 3. Prana, or vital energy. 4. The etheric body.

The microcosm reproduces the solar system in miniature. The above refers to the objective forms corresponding to the Sun and the seven sacred planets. However, the exoteric form is accompanied by mental development, which we call the seven principles. The human being develops seven principles that can be listed as follows:

5 T. D., I, 107. 6 Kama-manas is the fusion of the mental element and the desire element forming the personality, or ordinary intelligence,

expressed through the human brain.

The energies which express themselves through the lower varieties of mental matter are so transformed under its influence into slower vibrations that astral matter responds to them, and the two bodies vibrate together for a long time and become closely intertwined. Besant, "Ancient Wisdom").

Microcosmic Principles7

Two higher principles: 1. Active Intelligence. 2. Hidden Love-Wisdom.

(Monad's psychic nature is dual). 1. The Atma Principle. Spiritual nature. Will. 2. The Buddhi Principle. nature of love. Wisdom. 3. The Manas Principle. Intellectual nature. Activity. Note that the three principles understood as the Triad, together with the two synthesizing principles on the Monad plane, constitute the five principles and provide the key to the numbering to which H.P.B. has resorted in some places. We can put it this way:

I. Absolute ........................................ II. 1. Prakriti ........................

Monad Active Intelligence. Divine Manasaputra Love-Wisdom. Aspect of Vishnu

2. Purusha ........................

On the plane of objectivity III.

3. Atma 4. Buddhi 5. Manas

Triad

From the standpoint of evolution, we consider the two highest and the two highest principles to correspond to the Absolute, which manifests itself in duality. Duality precedes objectivity, which requires three. If we consider the principles in manifestation, their list may look as follows:

The first principle... Sphere of manifestation, Monadic egg Second Principle Atma ......... The third principle ....... Buddhi ......... The fourth principle... Manas .......... The fifth principle . . . Manas .......... The sixth principle ..... Kama-Manas ... Seventh Principle .......... Pure emotion, or feeling.

Will Pure Mind, Wisdom Pure Mind, Higher Mind Lower Mind

Here are the principles for the Microcosm, which in this case has already completely transcended physical bodies, so that this table refers entirely to subjective life, that is, to the development of the psyche, or Soul.

7 1. In nature there are two basic cosmic principles:

a. Active and passive, male and female (T.D., II, 556. I, 46). b. Buddhi and Mahat (See also T. D., I, 357. II, 649. III, 273).

2. These higher principles, when combined, produce three and seven (T.D., I, 46). a. They are called the three Rays of Essence and the four Aspects (T.D., I, 147). b. They may be called the three Guides with their three Aspects and Atma (T. D., I, 182. c. They are also called the Trilingual Flame of the Four Fitiles (T.D., I, 257).

This is true from a cosmic and human perspective.

The Principles of the Logos, The Seven Planetary Logos. D., I, 358, 365 Principles of the Planetary Logos... a conductor called a chain (T.D., I, 194, 196; II, 626)

The principles of man . . . various conductors

(See also: T.D., I, 176, 177; II, 630, 631; I, 189. Summary: T.D., III, 475).

3. Cosmic Thought, focused in principle, manifests itself as the consciousness of the individual (T. D., I, 351.

a. The individual’s mastering of the conductor leads to the manifestation of the energy of some plan. This energy will be special.

color and quality according to the plan.

4. The seven principles are the manifestation of one Flame (T. D., I, 45; III, 374. Notice also the function of the Gods in equipping man with his principles (T. D., I, 308.

This should be remembered well, otherwise there is confusion. In our listing we have

It’s about subjectivity, not form. Thus, we considered:

(a) The septenary objectivity of material forms; (b) the septenary subjectivity of psychic evolution; (c) the septenary spirituality of the essence.

Note also that in the table reflecting the spiritual life of the Monad, we considered it as a fivefold. It is inevitably so in the present fivefold evolution, but the other two principles can be described as:

6. The life of the Heavenly Man, in whose body is the human Monad.

7. The life of the Logos, in whose body is the Heavenly Man.

Here it would be useful to consider another enumeration of human principles8, how it manifests itself in the three worlds, as well as plans on which the subjective and objective are united. What are we dealing with here? Let’s start with what a person usually starts with, the lowest:

7. The etheric body .................... 6. Prana ................................. 5. Kama Manas ....................... 4. The lower mind ........................ 3. Manas ................................. 2. Buddhi ................................ 1. Atma ...................................

1. The vital body 2. Vital Force 3. The Desired Mind 4. Specific mind 5. The higher or abstract mind 6. Wisdom, power of Christ, intuition 7. Spiritual Will

This is a list of the lowest level, relating to the underdeveloped person of our time.

What can we see from the ego’s point of view?

I am absolutely ........................ II. Duad

Atma. Pure will to be

1. Buddhi ........ Pure Reason, Wisdom 2. Manas ........................ Pure Mind

II. Triad

3. Causal body 4. The lower mind 5. Kama Manas 6. Prana 7. The etheric body

8 Numbering of Principles (T. D., II, 627, 631). 1- the Principle......... A dense physical body. Shula Sharira 2- the Principle......... The etheric body. Ling Sharir 3- the Principle......... Prana. Vital energy. 4- the Principle......... Kama rupa. The Energy of Desire (T.D., I, 136)

(These are the four lower principles)

5 Princip ......... Manas. Energy of thought. The average principle

(T.D., II, 83, 84; II, 332. II, 669).

6- the Principle......... Buddhi. Energy of Love (T.D., II, 649, 676; III, 58) 7- the Principle......... Atma. Synthetic principle (T.D., I.D, 357, 201; III, 142)

See chap. T. D., III, 201, note.

a. Buddhi is the vehicle of Atma; b. Manas is Buddhi's guide; c. Kama-rupa is the vehicle of Manas (T. D., II, 171); The etheric body is the vehicle of prana.

Remember also:

a. That the physical body is not a principle (T.D., II, 652; III, 445, 652); b. That atma is not a principle (see also T.D., III, 62, 63; III, 293).

(Other lists, differing in details, are given in: T.D., I, 177, 181, 685; II, 669; III, 476, 560. The latter is more esoteric).

In these various enumerations we discuss the principles (according to H.P.B.'s instructions on how they should be listed)9 10 from different points of view, as well as depending on the stage reached.

It is septenary in evolution and in time, nine-terrestrial in the period of obscuration and ten-fold in the period of time.

Objective development

Dissolution.

Macrocosmic 1. The seven sacred planets of the solar system.

2. Two hidden, synthesizing planets. 3. One final synthesizing planet is the Sun. Seven plus two plus one makes up

Ten.

These are the ten centers of the Great Heavenly Man.

The Heavenly Man.

1. Seven Circuits circuit. 2. Two Synthesizing Chains. 3. One last chain.

The Planetary Logos has ten centers.

Microcosm.

1. The seven conductors used are: a) the Atmic shell. b) the Buddhic conductor. c) the Causal, or egoic, body. d) the Mental body. e) the Astral body. e) the Etheric body. f) the dense physical. 2. Two synthesizing bodies: a) Causal body. b) Physical body. 3. One Synthesizing Body

(a) Monadic shell.

In the physical conductor there are seven centers corresponding to these bodies, with synthesizing centers in the heart and throat; the head is the place of final synthesis. This list refers exclusively to that which is connected with the form, as well as to the conductors in which the Logos, Manasaputra, and Man reside.

3. Subjective development

It is also septenary:

1. Astral ....................... 2. Kama-manas ........................ 3. Manas ....................................... 4. The highest manas ........................

Pure desire, emotion, feeling. Desire-mind. The lower specific mind. Abstract or pure mind.

9 E. P. Blavatsky, in The Secret Doctrine, says in connection with the Principles: a. Misclassifications in classification are very possible (T.D., II, 677). b. We must seek occult meaning (T.D., II, 652). In fact, there are six, not seven principles. There are several classifications (T.D., III, 374, 446). Mr. The esoteric list cannot correspond to the exoteric list (T.D., III, 476). d. The list of principles is a matter of spiritual progress (T.D., III, 456, 460). 10 T. D., III, 456.

5. Buddhi ........................ 6. Atma ........................................ 7. Monadic ........................

Pure mind, intuition. Pure will, realization. Will, Love-Wisdom, Intelligence.

Subjective development is connected with the septenary development of the inherent love-wisdom with the help of the mind. On a macrocosmic scale, it is realized through seven Celestial People who are actively intellectual, are intrinsically loving and objectively visible through their forms, planetary schemes. Together they are the Logos, the Great Man of Heaven. In the case of the Heavenly Man, development is accomplished through the seven groups of human beings that make up his psychic centers. These groups on their own plane develop intelligence, have inherent love, and can objectively come into contact with them on the seven circuits of the scheme. In the case of the individual man, development takes place through his seven centers, which are the key to his psychic evolution. A person also develops intelligence, has inherent love and is objectively visible due to one or another of his bodies.

What I would like to emphasize here is the fact of mental development, and also that subjective evolution is the main enterprise of the Logos, the Planetary Logos and man. As a result of evolutionary progress, active intellectual love arises (thanks to the use of the mind, the innate quality of love is revealed from the hidden state). Just as the duality of objectivity is life-form, so the duality of subjectivity is mind-love, and the combination of the two creates consciousness. Only the Spirit is one and indivisible; the development of the Spirit (or the development of the fruits of evolution by it) can be realized and realized only when the dual evolution of form and psyche is completed. Then the Spirit reaps the fruits of evolution and absorbs the qualities acquired during the manifestation period - perfect love and perfect intelligence, which as a result already manifest themselves as Active Intellectual Love-Wisdom.

Thus, to the question “What is the aspect of the Mind and why does it matter?” we might answer that the aspect of the mind is the ability, or skill, of a logical Existence to think, act, build, and evolve to develop the capacity for active love. When the Logos, which is active intelligence, passes through its life cycle, it will also become a love fully manifested in all Nature. The same can be attributed to the Heavenly Man in his sphere, as well as to the man in his tiny cycle. Thus, the importance of manas can be seen in full. It is the means by which evolution becomes possible, understanding is achieved, activity is born and practiced.

Let’s look at how to express this topic, if you look at it from the point of view

Vision of Fire:

Objectively 1. Sea of fire ..........

2. Akash ..................... 3. Ether ....................... 4. Air .................... 5. Fire ...................... 6. Astral Light 7. Physical plan electricity

Subjectively Spiritual 1. Our God is the fire that eats 2. The Light of God ........................ 3. Heat of Matter ............... 4. Enlightenment of intuition 5. The Fire of Mind 6. Heat of emotions

Energy-energizing Will Aspect of Form Aspect of Activity

7. Kundalini and Prana

The triple secret is: 1. The mystery of electricity 2. The mystery of the seven constellations 3. The secret of who is above the LOGO.

Heavenly Men and Man The final part of the sixth question is: Who are the Manasaputras? We will talk about this in more detail in connection with our planet when we come to the topic of the coming of the Lords of the Flame. Here, I would like to clarify some facts that should form the basis for any discussion on this issue. The divine Manasaputra, 11 12, mentioned in the "Secret Doctrine" under various names, are the "Mind-born Sons of Brahma," the Third Logical Aspect.

They are the seven planetary Logos, and they are the Lords of the Rays, the Seven Heavenly Men. They developed a mental aspect in the First Solar System, which was dominated by Brahma, embodying objective existence. He did so in the same sense that the second aspect (the Vishnu aspect, or the Dragon of Wisdom) is in our Second System the totality of existence.

The cells of their bodies are composed of units of human and deva evolutions in the same way (only at the highest turn of the spiral), as the bodies of human beings are composed of living organisms - various animated cells, or smaller lives. This fact is fundamental in occultism, and careful reflection on the relationship between the cells of human conductors and the cells of the bodies of the Heavenly Man will lead to enlightenment.

Just as man has his original source, the Monad, and the conditionally constant vehicle, the causal body, manifesting itself through its lower principles (of which the dense physical is not a principle), so Heavenly Man has his original source, the Monad. His conditionally constant body is at the monadic levels of the solar system, but He manifests Himself through the three lower shells - our atmic, buddhic and manasic levels. It takes an external position with respect to the astral and physical planes, just as the human being is external with respect to the physical body. Man animates the physical vehicle with his power or warmth, but in the occult sense does not regard it as a principle. So the Heavenly Man is beyond the two lower planes of manifestation, though he animates them with his power. The human being is aware of his relationship (as a cell of the body) with the Heavenly Man only when he develops ego consciousness on his own plane. If this is so, then the groups of causal bodies are the lower forms through which the Celestial Man manifests, just as the physical body is the lowest of the bodies through which the human being manifests, and the etheric body is involved.

It should be remembered that manifested Beings embody certain plans, and points

Their lowest involutions are at different levels:

11 Sons of Mind: known by various names, such as "Manasaputra, Prajapati, Kumara, Primordial Seven, Rudra,

Heavenly Men, Rishis, Spirits before the Throne.

12 The “Secret Doctrine” speaks of the Heavenly People as: 1. The working forces of creation. They are a combination of manifestations (T. D., I, 470). 2. They are pre-cosmic (T. D., I, 470). 3. They are a combination of solar and lunar entities (T.D., I, 152, 470. Wed: II, 374). 4. They are the seven biblical Archangels.

They are the seven powers or creative powers. They are the seven Spirits before the Throne. They are the seven Spirits of the Planets (T. D., I, 472, 153).

5. Together, they form the Secret Unpronounceable Name (T. D., I, 473). 6. They are collective Dhyan Chohans (T. D., I, 477). 7. They are the seven Kumaras. The Seven Rishis (T. D., I, 493; III, 196, 327). 8. They are the sons of light. D., I, 521, 522). 9. They are the Hierarchy of Creative Forces (T. D., I, 233).

10. They are a veiled synthesis (T.D., I, 362). 11. They are our own planetary deities (T. D., I, 153). 12. They are all human beings, created from other worlds. D., I, 132). 13. They are closely related to the seven stars of the Great Bear (T.D., I, 488; II, 332, 579, 668; III, 195). 14. They are symbolized by circles (T. D., II, 582). 15. They are all fallen angels. D., II, 284, 541).

Man is born on the monadic level, his main focal point is on the fifth, mental, level, but he strives for his full conscious development on the three lower planes: mental, astral and physical.

b) The Celestial Man originates from levels outside the Solar System (as man is born outside the three worlds of his aspiration), his main focal point is on the second plane of the system - the monadic, and He reveals consciousness on the Triad planes - this applies to all cells 272] his body. He developed consciousness on the three lowest planes of the three worlds during the First Solar System, and this again applies to the cells of His body. Man repeats his efforts until the Fifth Initiation, which leads him into the stage of consciousness attained by the Heavenly Man in one of the preceding Mahamanvantarics. This should be well remembered in connection with initiations.

c) The Solar Logos originates from an even higher cosmic level, its main focal point is on the Cosmic mental plane, but He manifests Himself through the three lower cosmic planes, as well as man seeks self-expression in the three worlds. Therefore, the seven main plans of the solar system on a cosmic scale relate to it in the same way as the physical plan to man. They form His ethereal and dense body. We can say that:

1. He activates them with his life and warmth. 2. He revives them. 3. Thanks to them, He becomes fully conscious. 4. The etheric body is in time its lowest principle, but the dense physical is not considered to be so. The dense cosmic physical body is composed of the matter of the three lower planes of the solar system: mental, astral, and physical. Therefore, the Buddhic plane is the Fourth Cosmic Ether.

d) Celestial People form seven centers in the Logos body. They are thus spheres of fire that revive His body, and each of them, depending on the place occupied in this body, expresses one of the forms of the power manifestation of the Logos.

e) Human beings, when concentrated in groups on causal levels, form

One of the seven centers in the body of the Heavenly Man.

(e) The Solar Logos forms one center in the body of an even greater Cosmic Entity. Thus, human 273] beings are placed in one of the forty-nine centers (but not groups, since the center can consist of many groups corresponding to different parts) of the seven Celestial People.

Heavenly Man with his seven centers forms one center in the body of the Solar Logos. Here I would like to emphasize the close connection between the Rishi family of the Great Bear and the seven Heavenly People. The Seven Rishis of the Great Bear are to them what the Monad is to the individual developing man.

BASIC POSTS

These postulates are simply the development of the three main provisions given in the Prologue to the

The first is the "Secret Doctrine." P. Blavatsky.1

I. There is one Infinite Invariant Principle; one Absolute Reality prior to any manifested conditioned Being. It is beyond the reach of any human thought or expression.

The manifested universe is enclosed in this Absolute Reality and is its conditioned symbol. In the totality of this manifested universe, three aspects are distinguished: 1. The First Cosmic Logos, Impersonal and Unmanifested, Predecessor

Manifested.

2. The Second Cosmic Logos, Spirit-Matter, Life, Spirit of the Universe. 3. The Third Cosmic Logos, Cosmic Thinking, Universal World Soul.

1 T.D., I, 42-44.

From these basic creative principles come in a certain order countless universes, including an infinite number of manifested stars and solar systems.

Each Solar System is a manifestation of the energy and life of the great Cosmic Existence, which we, for lack of a better term, call the Solar Logos. This Solar Logos is incarnated, that is, it reaches manifestation, through the medium of the Solar System.

This Solar System is a body, or form, of given Cosmic Life, and it is trinified. This triple solar system can be described in terms of three aspects, or

Christian theology) of three persons.

1th Person .............. Father. Life. Will. Purpose.

Positive energy.

Electric Fire, or Spirit.

Sunfire, or the soul.

2th Person .............. Son. Consciousness. Love is Wisdom. Balanced energy.

The Fire of Friction, or Body, or Matter. 3th Face ............ Holy Spirit. Form. Active intelligence.

Negative energy.

Each of these three aspects is also threefold in manifestation, thus forming:

(a) Nine Powers, or Emanations; (b) Nine Sephiroth; (c) Nine Causes of Initiation.

They, together with the totality of manifestations, or the Whole, form a ten.

(10)

A perfect person, or a perfect person. These three aspects of the Whole are present in each form:

(a) The solar system is a trinity, manifesting itself through the three above-mentioned aspects. (b) The human being is also a trinity, manifesting as Spirit, Soul and Body, or Monad,

Ego and Personality.

c) The atom as it appears to the scientist is also threefold, since it is composed of a positive nucleus, negative electrons and a set of external manifestations, the result of the connection of the first two.

The three aspects of each form are interrelated and allow for interaction because:

(a) Energy is in motion and circulating; (b) All forms in the Solar System are part of the Whole, not part of the whole.

isolated units;

c) It is the basis of brotherhood, holy communion and astrology.

These three aspects of God, the Solar Logos, and Central Energy, or Forces (for these terms are synonyms), manifest themselves through the seven centers of power, the three principal and the four minor. These seven centers of logical power, in turn, are arranged in such a way that they form Entities, which are known as:

(a) Seven Planetary Logos, (b) Seven Spirits before the Throne, (c) Seven Rays, (d) Seven Heavenly Men.

The seven Logoi embody the seven types of differentiated power and are called the Lords.

Rays. The rays are called:

Ray I ..... Ray of Will, or Power .......... 1nd Aspect Ray II ..... Ray of Love-Wisdom ......... 2nd Aspect Ray III .. Ray of Active Intelligence .......... 3th Aspect These are the three main Rays.

Ray IV .. Ray Harmony, Beauty and Art Ray V... The Ray of Concrete Knowledge, or the Science of Ray VI. The Ray of Devotion, or Abstract Idealism The Ray of Ceremonial Magic, or Order

II. There is a basic law called the Law of Periodicity.

1. This law governs all manifestation, whether it is the manifestation of the Solar Logos through the solar system or the manifestation of the human being through the medium of form. This Law also governs all the kingdoms of nature.

2. There are other laws related to the main one in the System. Here are some of them:

(a) The Law of Economy ...

b) The Law of Attraction

(c) The law of synthesis.

The law that governs matter, the third aspect, the law that governs soul, the second aspect, the law that governs spirit, the first aspect.

3. There are three cosmic laws. There are seven other laws that also apply to

The system is controlled by the manifestation of our Solar Logos: a) the Law of Vibration. b) the Law of Clutch. c) the Law of Decay. d) the Law of Magnetic Control. e) the Law of Fixation. e) the Law of Love. f) the Law of Sacrifice and Death.

4. Each of these laws is manifested mainly on one of the seven plans.

Solar system.

5. Each law periodically takes control, each plan has its own

period of manifestation and period of obscuration (removal). 6. Every manifested life has three great cycles:

Birth ........ Appearance ........ Involution ................. Inert movement Tamasic life ........................

Life .............. Death Increases ................................. The disappearance of evolution... Obscuring Activity... Rhythmic movement Rajasic .. Life

Sattvic Life

7. Knowledge of cycles includes knowledge of number, sound and color. 8. Only the perfect adept has full knowledge of the secret of cycles.

III. All souls are the same as the Supersoul.

1. The Logos of the Solar System is Macrocosm. Man is a Microcosm. 2. The soul is an aspect of every life form from the Logos to the atom. 3. The connection between all souls and the Supersoul forms the basis of scientific belief in Brotherhood.

Fraternity is a fact that exists in nature, not an ideal.

4. The Law of Correspondence explains the details of this relationship.

The Law of Correspondence, or Analogy, is the explanatory Law of the System. He explains

Man of God.

5. Just as God is the Macrocosm for all the kingdoms of nature, man is

Macrocosm for all prehuman kingdoms.

6. The purpose of the evolution of the atom is self-consciousness, as expressed in the human kingdom. 7. The purpose of human evolution is group consciousness, an example of which is Planetary Consciousness.

Logos.

8. The purpose of the Planetary Logos is Divine Consciousness, an example of which is Solar

Logos.

9. The Solar Logos is the totality of all states of consciousness within the solar system.

2I. The Seven System Plans: 1. The Divine Plan (Logos) 2. The Monadic Plan (Monada) 3. Spiritual Plan 4. Intuitive plan

1-th space ether 2-th space ether 3-th space ether 4-th space ether

5. Mental Plan (Ego) 6. Astral Plan 7. Physical II. The seven differences, denoted in terms of fiery energy:

Gas Plan Liquid Plan Rough

1. Plan of Divine Life 2. Plan of Monadic Life... 3. Plan Atma 4. Buddha's plan, intuition. 5. Plan of Mind 6. Plan of desire 7. Physical plan

Father Son Holy Spirit Central.

Sea of Fire Akasha Air Air Fire Astral Light Air

III. Plans of Logical Evolution: Seven Plans

Plans for the evolution of the Son .........................................six plans for the monadic evolution ..................five plans for human evolution ..................three worlds

Seven is the number of manifestation. Three is the number of consciousness. One is the number of Life, or Spirit.

IV. Electric fire..

Father... Spirit...

Sunfire. Son... Consciousness...

Fire of friction Holy Spirit Matter

Much of the discussion, especially between physicists and chemists, has been about the nature of the substance that, according to scientific hypotheses, should fill the entire space. One side insists that it is infinitely thinner than the most rarefied gas, completely devoid of friction and weight; the other states that it is denser than the hardest body. It is believed that in this substance the primary atoms of matter float like dust grains in the sun's ray, and light, heat, and electricity rely on its vibrations. Theosophical researchers, using methods that are not available to physical science, have found that these hypotheses are related to two completely different and separate categories of phenomena. Being able to deal with states of matter more subtle than gas, they discovered that it is through the vibrations of this subtle matter that light, heat and electricity manifest themselves for us. Seeing that matter in these higher states fulfills the functions attributed to the ether of science, they (perhaps unwisely) called these states ethereal, thus remaining without a suitable name for the substance that fulfills the other part of the requirements of science. Let’s temporarily call it a coil, because it fills what we used to call empty space. What mulaprakriti or “matter-matter” is to the entire incomprehensible universe, coilon is to our particular universe — not just to the solar system, but to the vast totality that includes all the visible suns. There must be different stages between coil and mulaprakriti, but we do not now have direct means to determine their number or to ascertain anything about them. However, in the ancient occult treatise we read of a "colorless spiritual fluid that exists everywhere and forms the foundation upon which our solar system is built. Outside the latter, it is in pristine purity only between the stars of the universe. Because this substance is of a different kind than that known on Earth, the inhabitants of the latter, looking through it, in their illusion and ignorance, believe that this is empty space. κοιλος; — empty, hollow. But in the whole boundless universe there is not a finger of empty space. In this treatise it is said that "matter-matter" produces this ether of space on the seventh degree of compaction, and it is said that this is the "substance" of all objective suns. With any power of vision available to us, this coil appears homogeneous, although perhaps it is not at all, since only the mother substance can have uniformity. Beyond all measure, it is denser than any substance we know, infinitely denser, if such an expression is permitted; it is so dense that it seems to belong to a different type or order of density. And here's the most striking result of this study: we might expect matter to be a compaction of this coil, but it's not. Matter is not coil, but the absence of coil, and at first glance it seems that matter and space have changed places, and emptiness has become solid, and solid - emptiness. To understand this more clearly, let's examine the primary atom of the physical plane (the beginning of the chapter. III). It consists of ten rings or wires, separate from each other and not touching anywhere. If you take one of them separately, unraveling its specific spiral stacking and spreading on a flat surface, you can see that this is a vicious circle - a tightly twisted endless turn. It is a spiral that has 1680 And they can be turned into an even bigger circle. This process can be repeated again, having obtained an even greater circumference, and this can be repeated until all seven sets of spiryls are turned, having obtained a gigantic circumference from such minute points as can be imagined, like pearls strung on an invisible thread. These points

so incredibly small that it takes many millions of them to make up one primary physical atom, and although their number can hardly be easily ascertained, several different methods of calculation yield approximately fourteen billion. With such huge numbers, it is obvious that direct counting is impossible, but fortunately, different parts of the atom are quite similar to each other, which allows you to make a calculation with not so much error. The atom consists of ten such “wires”, which are naturally divided into two groups — three thicker and more noticeable and seven thinner, which correspond to colors and planets. These latter seem identical in structure, though the forces flowing through them must differ, since each responds most readily to its own particular set of vibrations. By direct calculation, it was found that the number of turns or first-order spirals in each "wire" is equal to 1680, and the ratio of the different orders of the spirillas to each other in all cases studied is always equal and corresponds to the number of points in the primary spirilla of the lowest order. This usual septenary rule is exactly followed on all finer turns, but there is a curious variation concerning the set consisting of three. As you can see from the pictures, they are obviously thicker and more visible. This is caused by an increase (so small that it is barely noticeable) in the proportional ratio of one order of spirals to another and the number of points at the most limiting. This increase, which in each case is not more than 0,00571428 Of the total, this part of the atom is allowed to undergo some change - actually be in the process of growth, so there is reason to assume that the three thicker spirals originally resembled others. Since observation shows us that every physical atom is represented by forty-nine astral atoms, every astral atom by forty-nine mental atoms, and every mental atom by forty-nine Buddhic atoms, there are several series of regular progressions here, and it is natural to suppose that these series continue on where we can no longer observe them. This assumption becomes even more probable by the fact that if we take one point for what corresponds to the atom of the seventh, or highest of our planes (as suggested in Ancient Wisdom. 42) and multiply by assuming that 49 such points form an atom on the next, or sixth plane, 2401 — on the fifth, etc., we shall find that the quantity thus obtained for the physical atom (496 ), almost exactly corresponds to the calculation based on direct counting of turns. In fact, it seems likely that without a slight gain in the three thicker "wires" of the atom, the correspondence would be accurate. It should be noted that the physical atom cannot be directly broken down into astral atoms. If the force unit that swirls these millions of points so that they take on the complex form of a physical atom is pushed back by the will effort through the threshold of the astral plane, the atom will instantly disappear as the points are liberated. But the same unit of force, now working at a higher level, will express itself not through one astral atom, but through a group of atoms 49. If this process of repression is continued to the mental plane, we will find a group of higher atoms increased to 2401. At the buddhic level, the number of atoms formed by the same amount of force is even much greater — perhaps a cube 49 Instead of a square, though they were not actually counted. Therefore, one physical atom is not composed of 49 astral or 2401 This corresponds to the mental atoms, in the sense that the force manifested through them could express itself at these higher levels, energizing the corresponding numbers of atoms. These dots or beads seem to be the constituents of all matter of which we know anything, the astral,

The mental and buddhic atoms are constructed of them, so that we may well regard them as fundamental units, as the basis of matter. All these units are the same, they are spherical and have a completely simple structure. Although they are the basis of matter, they are not matter themselves; they are not bricks but bubbles. They do not resemble air-fed soap bubbles, consisting of a thin film of water separating the outer air from the inner and having both an inner and outer surface. They are rather like bubbles that arise in water and have not yet reached the surface - those bubbles that can be said to have only one surface - water pushed away by the air contained in it. Just as such bubbles are not water, but only places where there is no water, so these units are not coil, but the absence of coil - just zones where there is none - floating in it. It should be remembered that, as stated in the Secret Doctrine, all of our seven planes are only subplanes of the cosmic physical plane, and therefore, although these points may be regarded as limiting atoms to the cosmic physical plane, in the absolute sense they are not the limit. "spots of nothing" - after all, the inside of these bubbles of space is for the most perceptive vision that we could only apply to them, an absolute emptiness. This is a startling and almost unthinkable fact. Matter is nothing, space obtained by the displacement of an infinitely dense substance. Fohat is truly "digging holes in space," and these holes are ephemeral nothingness, the bubbles from which "solid" universes are built. What, then, are these bubbles, or rather, what is their content, the force that is capable of inflating bubbles in substances of infinite density? The ancients called this force “breath,” and it seems that this symbol indicates that those who used it saw this cosmic process, in which the Logos breathed into the waters of space, creating bubbles from which universes are built. Scientists may call this "Power" as they please, names are nothing; for us Theosophists, it is the breath of the Logos, though we do not know whether the Logos is our solar system or an even more powerful being; it is most likely the latter, since the above-quoted occult treatise says that this breath is the substance of all visible suns. The breath of the Logos is the power that fills these spaces, it is its power that holds back the terrible pressure of the coil, they are full of its Life, of itself, and all that we call matter, on the high or on the low plane, is permeated with divinity; these units of power, of life, the bricks from which it builds its universe, are its very Life, scattered in space, and it is correctly written, "I have established this whole." And when he takes his breath, the waters of space will close again, and the universe will disappear. It's just breathing. The breath that creates these bubbles is quite different from the three outpourings, or Life Waves, so familiar to students of Theosophy, and has long preceded them. The first wave of life picks up these bubbles and, swirling them, gives them different arrangements, which we call atoms of different planes, collects them into molecules, and on the physical plane into chemical elements. Worlds are built from these voids, which seem to us to be nothing, but are a divine force. It's matter made out of her absence. How true were the statements. P. In The Secret Doctrine, she wrote, “Matter is nothing but a collection of atomic forces” (III, 398). The Buddha taught that the primary substance is eternal and unchanging. Its conductor is pure radiant ether, infinite and infinite space, not the emptiness resulting from the absence of all forms, but, on the contrary, the basis of all forms" (III, 492). How vividly and unmistakably this knowledge brings us closer to the great doctrine of Maya, of the immensity and unreality of all earthly things, and of the extremely deceptive nature of appearances! When a candidate for initiation actually sees (not just believes) that what has always seemed to him empty space, in fact -

A solid mass of incomprehensible density, and matter, which seemed to be the only tangible and definite basis of all things in comparison, is not only sparse as the thinnest fabric (the web woven by the "Father-Mother"), but in reality consists of emptiness and nothing - the very negation of matter - then for the first time he deeply appreciates the futility of physical feelings as guides to truth. And the great certainty of the immanence of the Divine becomes even clearer; for not only is everything animated by the Logos, but everything in visible manifestation is literally a part of it, built from its substance, so that to the disciple who really understands matter becomes sacred as well as spirit. The coil in which all these bubbles are formed is part, and perhaps a crucial part, of what science considers to be the light-bearing ether. Whether it is actually a carrier of vibrations of light and heat through interplanetary space has not yet been determined. It is only clear that these vibrations penetrate and reach our bodily senses only through the etheric matter of the physical plane. But this does not prove that they are transmitted through space in the same way, because we know very little to what extent there is etheric physical matter in interplanetary and interstellar space, although the study of meteoric matter and cosmic dust shows that at least some of it is scattered there. The scientific theory is that the ether has some ability to transmit transverse waves of all lengths and amplitudes at a certain speed, which is usually called the speed of light and is 300000 km/s It is likely that this may be true of coilone, and if so, it must also transmit these waves to bubbles or bubble aggregates, and before light reaches our eyes, there must be a transfer down from the plan to a plan similar to what takes place when thought awakens emotion or triggers action. In a recent paper on the density of the ether, Sir Oliver Lodge observes: “Just as the mass-to-volume ratio is small in the case of the solar system, the nebula, or the web, I am inclined to think that the observed mechanical density of matter may constitute an exceptionally small part of the total density of the substance of the ether contained in space, which this matter thus only partially occupies — the substance from which it can hypothetically consist. Take, for example, the mass of platinum and assume that its atoms are composed of electrons or other structures that are not quite different: the space that these bodies actually fill in comparison with all the space they occupy will be one ten-millionth of a part even inside each atom, and for the visible mass, the part will be even smaller. So the minimum estimate of the density of the ether, made on this basis, should be of order 10 billion of platinum.” He further adds that this density can easily exceed the density of platinum and 50 billion One. He says: “The densest known matter may be like gauze compared to the unmodified ether of the same space.” With our ordinary ideas, this seems unthinkable, but it is undoubtedly an understatement, not an exaggeration of the true proportion observed in the case of coil. We shall understand how this can be so, if we remember that it appears to be absolutely uniform and solid, even when investigated with an increase in which the physical atoms look like secluded houses scattered across an empty plain, and in addition we should remember that the bubbles of which these atoms in turn consist can themselves not without reason be called fragments of nothing. In the same article, Sir Oliver Lodge makes a startling assessment of the energy inherent in ether. He states: "The total power plant is one million kilowatts, continuously operating 30 millions of years, inaccessible in every cubic millimeter of ether." Here again, he may be underestimating this

The amazing truth. Of course, one might ask, if this is the case, how can we move freely in a solid body that Oliver Lodge says is ten billion Harder than platinum? The obvious answer is that when the densities of bodies are sufficiently different, they can move through each other completely freely. For example, water or air passes through matter, air passes through water, the astral form passes unconsciously through a wall or an ordinary human body; many of us have seen the astral form pass through the physical without even noticing it. It doesn't matter if we say a ghost goes through a wall or a wall through a ghost. The dung freely passes through the rock and moves inside the earth with the same convenience as we walk through the air. And the deeper answer is that consciousness can only recognize consciousness, and since we have the nature of a logos, we can only sense those things that also have its nature. These bubbles are his essence, his life, and therefore we, as a part of him, can see matter built from his substance, because all forms are only his manifestations. Coilon, on the other hand, is unmanifest for us, for we have not revealed the forces that would enable us to know it, and it may be the manifestation of a logos of a higher order that is beyond our knowledge. Since none of our researchers can raise their consciousness to the highest plane of our universe, the adi-tattva plan may be of interest in explaining how they can see what is likely to be its atom. It is important to remember that the force of increase by which these experiments were conducted is something quite different from the ability to function on one plane or another. The latter is the result of the slow and gradual development of the ego, while the former is simply the special development of one of the many faculties latent in man. All the planes are here, all around us, just as they are at any other point in space, and if a man sharpens his vision so much that he can see their smallest atoms, he will be able to explore them, although he will be far from the level that will allow him to understand the higher planes as a whole and function on them, or come into contact with the great Minds who collect these atoms into their conductors. Here you can find a partial analogy with the position of the astronomer in relation to the stellar universe, or, say, with the Milky Way. He can observe their components and learn a lot about them in different aspects, but it is absolutely impossible for him to look at it from the outside as a whole or to form a certain idea of the true form of this Universe and what it really is. Suppose that the universe, as many of the ancients thought, is an unimaginably large being, and it is impossible for us to know what this being is and what it does, since it would require a rise to a height comparable to its own. However, we can do extensive and detailed research on the parts of his body that are within our reach, because it means just patient use of the forces and mechanisms already at our disposal. But it is not to be supposed that by discovering a little more of the wonders of Divine Truth by advancing our investigations to the limit of our possibilities, we will somehow alter what has already been written in the Theosophical literature about the form and structure of the physical atom and the wonderful and orderly arrangement of atoms in various chemical molecules — all this remains unchanged. Nor will this affect the idea of the three outpourings of the Logos and the amazing ease with which matter of different planes is built up by them into forms that serve the developing life. But if we wish to acquire a true view of the realities behind the manifestation of this universe, we must to some extent change our ordinary ideas about the essence of matter to the opposite. Instead of thinking of its primary constituents as solid particles floating in

We must realize that this apparent emptiness is itself solid, and the particles are only bubbles in it. Once we understand this fact, we leave everything else as it was. The relative position of what used to be called matter and force remains the same for us as always; on closer examination, both of these concepts turn out to correspond to the power variants, one of which animates the combinations of the other, and the true "matter," coilon, seems to be something that has hitherto remained completely outside our mental schemas. In the light of this amazing self-distribution of the Logos through “space,” the familiar notion of his “victim” takes on a new grandeur and depth; it is his “dying in matter,” his “continuous sacrifice,” and perhaps all the magnificence of the Logos — that he can sacrifice himself to the extreme by penetrating and making part of himself that portion of the coil he has chosen as the field for his universe. What is a coil, what is its origin, and whether it itself changes by the Divine Breath pouring into it, whether thus the "dark space" at the beginning of manifestation becomes a "bright space" - we cannot even point out the answers to these questions at present. It is possible that a thoughtful study of the great scriptures of the world will give them.

SPACE

The “Mother-Birth” Space is the eternal, ever-present Cause of all things, the Unfathomable Godhead, whose “Invisible Covers” are the mystical Root of all Matter and the Universe. Space is that single, eternal, which we can most easily imagine unshakable in its abstraction and independent of the influence and dependence on the presence or absence of an objective universe in it. It is out of dimension in every sense and self-existent. Spirit is the first differentiation from the “TOGO,” the Causeless Cause, both Spirit and Matter. As the Esoteric Catechism teaches us, "it is neither 'the infinite Void' nor 'conditional Fullness', but both. It was and always will be.”

So "covers" means the noumenon of undifferentiated Cosmic Matter. It is not matter as we know it, but the spiritual essence of matter, which is contemporaneous and even one with Space in its abstract sense. Root-Nature is also the source of the subtlest, invisible properties in visible matter. It is like the soul of the One and Infinite Spirit. The Hindus call it Mulaprakriti, Root-Matter, and claim that it is the Primordial Substance which is the basis, the Upadhi, or vehicle of every phenomenon, physical, mental, or mental. This is the source from which Akasha emanates.

THE NATURE OF SPACE

Here we must repeat some broad generalisations about the etheric body. The existence of the etheric body, inseparable from all material exoteric forms, is now acknowledged by many schools of scientific thought. Nevertheless, the original teaching has been revised to fit prevailing theories of energy and its forms of expression. Thinkers today recognise the factual nature of energy—I use the word “factual” quite deliberately. Energy is now regarded as all that IS; manifestation is the manifestation of an ocean of energies. Some are organised into forms, others constitute the environment in which those forms live and move and have their being, and still others animate both the forms and the surrounding substantial medium. It must also be remembered that forms exist within forms. This fact underlies the symbolism of the balls intricately carved by Chinese craftsmen from ivory…

bones, when the balls are enclosed in each other, all with a complex pattern, all free, but at the same time prisoners.

When you sit in a room, you are the shape inside the shape; the room itself is the shape inside the house, and the house (also the shape) is probably one of many similar houses standing side by side and forming an even larger shape together. But all, being these manifold forms, consist of a material substance, which you have coordinated and collected according to the design or idea and mind of a thinker, is a tangible form. This material substance is made up of living energies that vibrate together, but have their own quality and their own characteristic life.

The whole universe is ethereal in nature and full of life, and its dimensions cannot be analyzed by the greatest mind of our age, calculated in more than astronomical figures, if such a statement says anything at all to your mind. Its dimensions cannot be calculated even in light years; this cosmic etheric extension is the field of action of countless energies and the basis of all astrological calculations; it is the playground of any historical cycles - cosmic, systemic and planetary - correlated with the constellations, the worlds of the suns, the most distant stars and the numerous revealed universes, as well as with our own solar system, the many planets and the one on which we live. Everything exists in Space, and Space is ethereal in nature; Space, as Eastern science says, is the Essence. The greatness of man is that he sees space, can imagine this space as a field of living divine activity, filled with active cognitive forms, each of which exists in the etheric body of this unknown Being, each associated with any other form of force that not only ensures their existence, but also retains their relative status; however, each of the differentiated forms has its own differentiated life, its own unique quality or color, and its own, special and peculiar consciousness.

Nevertheless, this etheric body, however gigantic and unknown its size, is limited in nature and static in action; it retains a fixed form, a form of which we know absolutely nothing, but which is the etheric form of the Unknown Essence. Esoteric science calls this form SPACE; it is the specific extent in which any form, from the universe to the atom, has its place.

We sometimes speak of an expanding universe; what we really mean is an expanding consciousness, since it is the etheric body of the Essence, the Space is the receiver of numerous saturating and penetrating energies, as well as the field of the cognizable activity of the Universe's Lives, the multitude of constellations, distant stars, our solar system, the planets of the system, and the totality of these individual living forms. What connects them is consciousness and nothing else, and the field of conscious awareness is created by the interaction of all living cognizing forms within the etheric body of that great Life which we call SPACE.

Each form within the etheric body is like the center of a planet or human being; this similarity, if we proceed from what is reported here about human centers, is indisputable and obvious.

Each form (forming a set of substantial lives or atoms) is the center of the etheric body of the form in which it is part of. At the heart of its existence is a living dynamic point that integrates form and supports its essential being. A form or center, large or small, a person or an atom of substance, is connected with all other forms and reacts to the energies of the surrounding space, automatically perceiving some and rejecting others for lack of recognition; it ignores or transmits the energies emanating from other forms, thereby becoming, in its turn, an impressive agent. This is when a variety of truths are conjoined, conjugated, and forced to use similar terminology to express the same factual truths or ideas.

Again, each point of life within the center has its own sphere of radiation or its own field of influence; the latter is necessarily determined by the type, nature of inner Consciousness. It is the magnetic interaction between the many giant centers of energy in space that underlies any relationship established in astronomy: between the universes, solar systems and planets. Keep in mind, however, that it is the aspect of consciousness that makes the form magnetic, receptive, rejecting, or transmitting; consciousness varies according to the nature of the entity saturating or working through a large or small center. Keep in mind also that life flowing through all centers and animate all space as a whole is the life of the entity; hence it is the same life in all forms, limited in time and space by the intention, desire, form and quality of inner consciousness; there are many different types of consciousness, but life is always one and indivisible because it is ONE LIFE.

The sphere of radiation is always determined by the point of evolution of life and form; the correlative, integrating factor connecting the center with the center is life itself: life establishes contact; vitality is the basis of any relationship, even if it is not obvious to you; consciousness gives contact quality and colors radiation. In doing so, we return again to the fundamental trinity that I called Life, Quality, and Phenomenon in the previous book. Form is therefore the center of life as part of some aspect of the etheric body of Essence, Spaces, if one is talking about a living, animate existence such as a planet. The same is true for all smaller forms and composition of plans.

Within this center there is a point of life; the center is connected with all surrounding energies and has its own sphere of radiation or influence, determined by the nature or force of consciousness and the dynamic factor of the mental life of the animate entity. All these facts require your closest attention. Finally, in each center there is a central triangle of energies; one of these energies expresses the life-animating form; the other expresses the quality of consciousness, while the third - the dynamic integrating life, uniting form and consciousness in a single life expression - determines the radiation of form, the degree of its responsiveness to the surrounding energies and the general nature of the saturated life, plus its creative ability.

Much of what is set out in these pages will provide the key to the science of relationships, that is, in fact, the key to astrology, as well as to the science of Laya Yoga. The Last (fortunately for the Aryan race)

It has been a bad name since the time of the late Atlantis; but it will be revived and enjoyed at the highest turn of the spiral for the next five hundred years. Correctly restored, it will emphasize not the nature of any center, but the quality of consciousness that characterizes it and necessarily determines its sphere of radiation. According to the great Law of Correspondence, everything can be applied to all forms of life: the universe, the solar system, the planet, the human being, any prehuman form, and the tiniest atom of substance (whatever you mean by this last term!).

TIME

“Time” is only an illusion created by successive alternations of our states of consciousness throughout our wanderings in Eternity, and it does not exist, but “rests in sleep” where there is no consciousness in which an illusion can arise. The present is only a mathematical line separating that part of the Eternal Duration which we call the Future from the part which we call the Past. Nothing on Earth has a true, real duration, for nothing remains unchanged — or the same — for a billionth of a second; and the sensation we get from the apparent separation of time, known as the Present, comes from the vagueness of fleeting perceptions or a series of perceptions of objects conveyed to us by our senses, as these objects, from the realm of ideal representations we call the Future, pass into the realm of memories. In the same way, we feel the impression of duration from the action of an instantaneous electric spark, due to its foggy and long imprint on the retina. Indeed, a person or an object does not consist only of what is visible in it at any given moment, but is the totality of all its different and changing states from the moment of its appearance in material form up to its disappearance from our Earth. It is “these aggregates” that exist from time immemorial in the Future and gradually pass through matter in order to exist eternally in the Past. No one will say that a bar of iron dropped in the sea began its existence by leaving the air, and ceased to exist by entering the water, and that the bar itself consisted only of this intersection of the plane, which coincided at the moment with a mathematical plan that separated and, at the same time, connected the atmosphere with the ocean. The same is true of men and things which, falling from “will” to “was,” from the Future to the Past, instantly reveal to our senses, as if crossing their wholeness as they progress in Time and Space (as matter) from one Eternity to another. And these two eternities constitute that Duration, in which alone all has a true existence, if only our senses could perceive it.

ROOM

"Mind" is the name given to the totality of the states of Consciousness grouped under the determinative - Thought, Will and Feelings. During deep sleep, thinking ceases on the physical plane and memory is suspended; thus, for this time, "Mind does not exist," because the organ through which the "Ego" manifests its thinking and memory on the material plane has temporarily ceased to act. Numen can become a phenomenon on any plane of existence, manifesting on this plane through a suitable basis or conductor. And in the continuation of the long Night of rest, called Pralaya, when all lives have dissolved, the “Universal Mind” remains as a constant possibility of mental activity or as that abstract and absolute Thought, the concrete and relative manifestation of which is Mind. Ah-hi (Dhyan-Chohans) are a host of spiritual Beings - Angelic Ranks

In Christianity, the Elohim and the "Heralds" of the Jews are the vehicles for the manifestation of Divine or Universal Thought and Will. They are the rational Forces which give and establish in Nature her "Laws," and at the same time they themselves act according to the Laws imposed upon them in the same way by still higher Powers; but they are not the "personifications" of the Forces of Nature, as is often mistakenly thought. This Hierarchy of Spiritual Beings, through which the Universal Mind manifests itself, is like an army - a Host, indeed, through which the militant power of the people manifests itself; it consists of corps, divisions, brigades, regiments, etc.; each has its own individuality or its own special life, with a certain degree of freedom in action and corresponding responsibility; each is included in an even more extensive Individuality, to which each is subordinated to its own personal interests.

REASONS OF BEING

The Twelve Nidans or the Causes of Being. Each is a consequence of the previous cause and, in turn, the cause of the subsequent one. The totality of all Nidan is based on the Four Truths, a doctrine that is particularly characteristic of the Hinayana System13. They belong to the theory of flow, the law of adhesion, which generates merit and misconduct, and finally brings Karma into full force. This system is based on the great truth that one should be afraid of incarnation, for existence in this world brings man only suffering, unhappiness and pain; and death itself is not able to free man from this, for death is only the door through which he passes to the next life on Earth, after a brief rest on its eve - Devachan. The Hinayana system or the Small Chariot School is of very ancient origin; whereas the Mahayana or Big Chariot School dates back to a later period, for it arose after the death of the Buddha. Nevertheless, the foundations of the latter are as old as the mountains which have sheltered such schools since time immemorial; and the schools of Hinayana and Mahayana, both, in fact, teach the same Doctrine. The Jana or Chariot is a mystical expression, and both Chariot try to capture the doctrine that man can free himself from the sufferings of birth and even from the false bliss of Devachan by attaining Wisdom and Knowledge, which alone can dispel the fruits of Illusion and Ignorance.

"Causes of Existence" means not only physical causes known to science, but also metaphysical causes, of which the main is the desire to exist, the consequence of Nidan and Maya. The desire for conscious life is revealed in everything from the atom to the sun, and is a reflection of the Divine Thought, striving for objective existence, for the law that the universe exists. According to the Esoteric Teaching, the true cause of this supposed desire, as of all existence, will remain forever hidden, and its first emanations are the most perfect abstractions that the mind can conceive. These abstractions must, by necessity, be presupposed as the cause of the material universe, which appears to the senses and reason, and must underlie the secondary and subordinate forces of Nature, humanized and revered as "God" and "Gods" by the popular masses of all times. It is impossible to imagine anything without a cause; such an attempt brings the mind to the limit of consciousness. In fact, this is the state to which the mind must eventually arrive when we try to trace in reverse order the chain of causes and effects; but science and religion, both arrive rather than follow, at this point.

13 See “Buddhism”, Vasilieva, p. 97–128.

They do not know the limits of consciousness, for they do not know the metaphysical abstractions which are the only possible causes of physical concreteness. These abstractions become more and more concrete as they approach our plane of existence, until they finally manifest themselves in the form of the material universe, through a process of metaphysics becoming physics, analogous to the process by which steam can be condensed into water and water frozen into ice.

Maya, or Illusion, is an element which is part of all finite objects, for everything that exists has not an absolute, but only a relative reality, since the appearance in which the hidden noumenon is clothed for a given observer depends on the cognitive abilities of the latter. For the undeveloped eye of the savage, any picture will first appear as a meaningless chaos of stripes and strokes of paint, while the educated eye will immediately see a face or a landscape. Nothing is permanent except a single, hidden, absolute Being, which contains the noumena of all realities. The existences belonging to every plane of existence up to the highest Dhyan Chohans are like shadows cast by a magic lantern on a colorless screen. Nevertheless, all things are relatively real, for the knower is also a reflection, and therefore all things comprehended by him are as real to him as he himself is. Whatever reality things have, this reality must be found in them before or after they flash, like a flash of lightning in our material world; for we cannot know such an existence directly, so long as the senses-instruments we have can only transmit material existence into the field of our consciousness. On whatever plane our consciousness acts, we and the objects belonging to that plane are at that time our only realities. But, as we progress in development, we realize that in the stages we have gone through we have taken the shadows for realities and that the ascending process of the ego consists of a whole series of progressive awakenings, and each advance brings with it the conviction that we have finally now reached "reality." But only when we reach the absolute Consciousness and merge our consciousness with it, only then will we be freed from the delusions generated by Maya.

There is a “Seven Path” or “Ways” to the “Blessing” of Non-Being, which is Absolute Being, Existence, and Consciousness. The idea of “Eternal Non-Being,” which is “One Being,” would seem to be a paradox to anyone who does not remember that we limit our thoughts about Being to our present consciousness of Existence, making it a specific term instead of a universal one. The unborn child, if he could think in our sense of the term, would inevitably and in the same way limit his conception of Being to one life in the womb which he knows; and if he tried to express in his consciousness the conception of life after birth (death for him), then for lack of data for this, and also the ability to comprehend such data, he would probably express this life as "Non-Being". In our case, the One Being is the noumenon of all the nomens, who, as we know it, must lie at the base of the phenomena and provide them with the shadow of reality that they have, but for the comprehension of which we do not have, now, neither the proper feelings nor cognitive abilities. The intangible atoms of gold scattered in a ton of gold-bearing quartz may not be visible to the naked eye of the Rudokop, yet he knows that they are not only there, but that they are the only ones that give it value; and this ratio of gold to quartz may be weakly shaded.

Project materials · Card and available sources

University Project on SPECZASHCHITA Letterhead

Source status: Project

A university project on SPECZASHCHITA letterhead — a proposed educational initiative.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/documents

The public page listed in the register is missing. The document card has been preserved.

Open on the site

Project materials · Full published text

Kabardino Development Project

Source status: Project

Kabardino-Balkaria development project — project materials for the territorial area.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/proekt-razvitiya-kabardino.html

Open on the site

Strategy for the development of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic up to 2030

This report was developed by Pro-Invest Spetsproekt LLC on the basis of information provided by the Government of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, and no part of it can be reproduced or transferred to the coma in any form and by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording on magnetic media, if there is no written permission of the Government of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.

Introduction

2

In the middle 2006 The Government of the Republic decided to develop a development strategy for 2030 years

Over the past year, some progress has been made in the Republic. Its economy has come out of a phase of stagnation. In particular, the pace of industrial production has significantly increased

These changes indicate the possibility of improving the economic situation in the Republic through active actions of the regional authorities. Achievements must be consolidated and strengthened

This requires identifying the most promising areas

to concentrate the efforts of the state and society on them and to proceed to a systematic change in the nature of the modern economy, which is characterized by extremely low efficiency

The development and implementation of the Strategy serves this purpose

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Objectives of developing the Strategy. Main restrictions

3

Objectives of Strategy Development

Consolidate the efforts of government, society and business to ensure high and sustainable

Economic growth rate of the Republic

Identify priorities for concentrating power and effective use

Limited resources

In the long run, raise competitiveness to an acceptable level

the Republic and the demand for its economy in the Russian and world markets

To ensure a decent standard and quality of life for the population

Main restrictions

Low investment attractiveness of the region

The current structure of the economy does not take into account the natural and climatic features of the region, does not use its advantages and therefore is low efficiency

The population of the Republic, its business structures, social groups are anxiously expecting high results from the new socio-economic policy, which urgently requires the authorities to take non-trivial and decisive actions for the future development of the Republic.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Summary

4

The CBD economy is currently one of the least competitive in Russia. The reasons for this, which lie in the depths of the past decades, were aggravated by the transition of the country to the market. Accumulated problems are systemic and require an integrated, targeted solution

Analysis of industry trends in the world, their compliance with the current structure of the economy of the Republic, the natural and climatic and resource characteristics of the region, as well as the study of the prerequisites for accelerated and sustainable socio-economic development - all this leads to the conclusion that the promising areas of activity in the territory of the CBD can include the production of products of deep processing of agricultural raw materials (with a focus on the export of premium products), sports and health tourism and high-tech production of building materials

The development of the Strategy considered three alternatives to the development of the CBD economy: "Inertial development", "CBD - the center of recreation and tourism", "CBD - the center of health and effective environmental management". The most attractive alternative is "CBD - a center for health and effective environmental management"

The choice of this alternative and the implementation of the relevant strategy will allow 2030 the GRP Year 6,9 Once (before 255 billion Roughly reducing unemployment with 26% to 15%, increase the regional budget with its own revenues 35% to 75% Increase the average salary in 7,3 once, with 3,8 to 28,5 thousand rubles in modern prices

The priorities of the Government of the CBD outlined in the Strategy provide for its active participation in supporting and developing entrepreneurial initiative, protecting property rights in all other areas of economic activity in the republic:

Financial support: temporary tax preferences, co-financing of projects

at the federal level, promotion of products at the federal and international level, assistance in establishing business contacts with administrations and business in other regions of Russia and foreign countries

Support: Defending

Enterprises

Interests

One of the important conditions for the implementation of the Strategy is the formation of a new image of the CBD as a successfully developing, reliable and safe region for living and recreation in Russia.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Contents

5

1. The relevance of the development strategy of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

2. Prospective sectors of the economy

3. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy up to 2030

4. Prospects for the implementation of the Strategy

5. Annexes

1. Industry analysis: selection of priority industries

2. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy

3. Current socio-economic situation of the CBD

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The relevance of the development strategy of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

6

> Integrated

Low CBD competitiveness: CBD ranks 81 among 88 regions of the Russian Federation. Economic problems of the Republic are also characteristic for other subjects of the SFD

Testimony

Economics

evaluation

Her

About

The low competitiveness of the economy is due, in particular, to the extremely low efficiency of the use of resources available in the Republic. As a result, the main sectors of the economy, which give 50% Budgets bring less to the budget 20% Tax Revenues

The development strategy of the CBD is designed to focus the efforts of the authorities on the development of those high value-added sectors, to provide employees with high wages and income to the budget system of the Republic of an adequate amount of taxes

Capable of releasing

Products with

economy,

Who

The Republic has a number of competitive advantages, on the basis of which it can

A modern, highly efficient economy

The competitive advantages of the Republic can be realized only if

carefully thought out, active and purposeful actions of the authorities

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

At present, the economy of the Republic is not competitive. While maintaining its current structure, the prerequisites for overcoming the competitiveness crisis are weaker than that of most other subjects of the Russian Federation.

7

Competitiveness of CBD

Consolidated rating M 81**

The current competitiveness (***) reflects the competitiveness of the region according to the actual development results

The Growth Competitiveness***)

Reflects the ability to grow in the medium term, on the basis of the region's prerequisites

Assessment of the current situation of the region in Russia on the main indicators of socio-economic development

M 73

Estimation by investors and economically active population of the actual preference of the region for investment and residence

Amount of investments per capita, million rubles

M 35

Migration growth rate, %

The region’s relative ability to compete in the foreign market

Gross national income per person employed in the economy

Proportion of products produced in the region exported

M 79

Quality of infrastructure (transport infrastructure, electricity, telecommunications infrastructure, educational infrastructure, health care, living conditions of the population)

Quality of human resources (demography and migration of the population, quality of labor resources)

M 68

M 46

Business environment

(business environment, competitiveness of the leading sectors of the economy of the region, the level of development of the credit system, the level of costs for doing business, the efficiency of government)

M 84

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the authorities to improve the competitiveness of the region in recent years

M 84

(Projection for 2006 g. M75****)

*The calculation of competitiveness ratings was carried out according to the Pro-Invest methodology, developed on the basis of M. Porter (USA) and experience in assessing the competitiveness of the US and UK regions **We are here and then the place of CBD among 89 the Russian Regions 2004 St Petersburg. *** The concepts of modern competitiveness and growth competitiveness were first used in the works of M. Porter **** Projected values based on data from 9 months 2006 St Petersburg.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The problems accumulated in the economy of the Republic are systemic and are associated primarily with inefficient use of resources, with underestimation of the competitive advantages of the region.

8

Sectoral structure of the economy CBD*, 2005

50197

310 600

22%

1%

2%

9%

1%

19%

Agriculture

29%

Food industry

Mechanical Engineering Tourism

8%

5% 1%

Other basic industries

15%

Supporting Industries

25%

Other industries

17%

45%

2 482

1%

7%

4%

3%

14%

39%

32%

Turnover**, mln. rub.

Number of employed

Tax revenues, million rubles.

* In addition to turnover for medium and large enterprises, turnover of small business is taken into account

** For agriculture, the indicator "Gross production" is used instead of the indicator "Oborot" as the most accurately reflecting the level of production

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Employment structure in the sector "Other industries", ths. persons 138

Employed in health, education and other social services

Employed by individual work

80

58

2005

Basic sectors of the economy > Agriculture and food industry > Mechanical engineering > Metallurgy > Light industry > Building materials industry > Tourism > Oil production and refining > Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology > Science

Small Business

Supporting industries > Construction > Electricity and utilities > Transport and communications > Trade

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

It is necessary to increase the efficiency of the economy structure - that is, to provide employment of the population mainly in sectors with high levels of productivity and added value.

9

Changing the structure of the economy

On the chart, the structure of the CBD economy by employment and wages in industries. 2006

Increased productivity

) g 6 0 0 2

.

rubles

.

S and T

,

a l l i a n t o a r a Z

7,5

6,0

5,9

6,1

4,8

4,8

4,7

4,6

4,5

4,5

4,4

4,4

4,3

3,7 3,4

3,4

1,8

Science Tourism

Trade and marketing

Mechanical Engineering

Construction

Transport and communications

Small Business

Electric Power

Pharmaceutics

Other sectors of economy

Utilities

Agriculture

Number of employees, % (2006)

Construction materials

Metallurgy

Food industry

Light industry

Oil production and refining

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The development strategy of the CBD provides for the concentration of efforts and resources on priority sectors of the economy that ensure a high level of added and paid labor, as well as sustainable and adequate entry into the budget system of the Republic.

10

Consistency and main results of the stages of work on the Strategy

“We need to learn to concentrate resources on key development issues” Vladimir Putin

When developing a strategy, it is necessary to identify the most promising areas of economic development of the Republic, concentrate the efforts of the state and society on them and begin a systematic change in the nature of the modern economy, which is extremely inefficient.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Identification of priority sectors of the CBD economy

1.1. Identification of the priority sectors selection space: Identification of the list of sectors significant for the modern economy of the CBD and its expansion capable of developing in the CBD by fast-growing sectors of the world economy, characterized by a high level of added value and products in demand in foreign markets

1.2. Selection of priority sectors for development in the CBD

Selection criteria: 1. Prerequisites for development

the CBD

2. High level of added

Cost of products

3. Demand for products in

Foreign Markets

4. High synergy with respect to other industries 5. Importance of the industry in the future

the CBD Economy

Analysis of possible alternatives to the development of the CBD economy and the choice of the preferred alternative 2.1. Identification of development alternatives

Analysis of development alternatives that differ in goals, objectives and opportunities for implementation

2.2. Strategic choice of alternative to the CBD economy development

Selection criteria: 1. Budget security 2. The population is 3. Population income 4. Recoupment of state

Investments

5. Sustainability in the long term

Perspective

3. Formalization of the strategy. Formation of a package of promising investment projects. Determination of goals and objectives of the executive authorities for the implementation of the Strategy.

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The Republic has a number of competitive advantages, on the basis of which a modern, highly efficient economy can be formed*

11

Proportion of population younger than working age, %

17

20

22

Potentially high availability of labor resources at the expense of the younger generation

Almost 100 percent gasification of settlements, extensive road network of good quality

Gas supply in the region, %, 2003 93

85

70

Russian Federation

SFD

CBD

Russian Federation

SFD

CBD

Strong recreational potential and positive experience of its large-scale use in the past

Favorable climatic conditions for the creation of modern agricultural production with deep processing of its products, in demand in the Russian and foreign markets

Availability of significant reserves of minerals, products of deep processing of which are in demand in the regional and Russian markets

* For an analysis of the current socio-economic situation of the Republic, see annex.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Contents

12

1. The relevance of the development strategy of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

2. Prospective sectors of the economy

3. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy up to 2030

4. Prospects for the implementation of the Strategy

5. Annexes

1. Industry analysis: selection of priority industries

2. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy

3. Current socio-economic situation of the CBD

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Prospective sectors of the CBD economy

13

The choice of priority sectors for development in the CBD economy provides for careful consideration of the characteristics of the region, long-term trends in the evolution of similar industries in the world economy, sales opportunities for relevant products in the domestic and foreign markets.

When determining the optimal sectoral structure of the CBD economy, prospects were taken into account

development of not only historically developed areas of activity on its territory, but also the most actively growing sectors of the world economy, whose products are in demand in global markets. The analysis showed that from this point of view only the production of therapeutic and preventive drugs and other health products has the necessary prerequisites for development in the Republic.

In determining the priority sectors, the presence of the Republic is crucial.

necessary conditions for their successful development and the availability of real opportunities for the authorities to optimize these conditions

Industry analysis, taking into account possible risks, led to the conclusion that the most

promising for the formation of a competitive economy of the CBD tourism with the development of related activities; deep processing of agricultural raw materials; high-tech production of building materials

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Optimization of the sectoral structure of the economy provides not only for the accelerated development of existing industries, but also the formation of new industries for the Republic, whose products are in demand on the world market.

14

Sectoral structure of the CBD economy in 2005 (by turnover), %

Industries poorly represented in the current CBD economy but actively developing in the global economy

17%

29%

5%

5%

6%

6%

3%

10%

3%

1%1%1%

8%

5%

Agriculture

Food industry

Mechanical Engineering

Metallurgy

Light industry

Construction materials

Tourism

Small Business

Electric Power

Construction

Trade and marketing

Transport and communications

Utilities

Other sectors of economy

Information technology

Educational services

Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

The list of sectors of the economy to be analyzed in order to determine the priority for the Republic:

1. 2. 3. 4.

Agriculture Food industry Mechanical engineering Metallurgy

5. 6. 7. 8.

Light industry Building materials Tourism Oil production and processing

Small Business

9. 10. Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology 11. Educational services

Source: CBD Statistical Service; European business facts and figures; US manufacturing statistics

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The choice of priority sectors of the economy involves careful consideration of the characteristics of the region, long-term trends in economic development in the world, trends in demand for goods and services in the national and global markets.

15

5

Availability of export potential

4

The importance of the industry now and in the future

1

Availability of necessary and sufficient conditions for the development of the industry on the territory of CBD

The potential of industry development in the Republic

2

Industry’s ability to synergize with other sectors of the economy

3

Opportunities for production of high value-added products

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Priority for the CBD economy can be considered those industries for the development of which there are necessary and sufficient market conditions, which, in turn, can be optimized by regional authorities.

16

Availability of necessary conditions in the CBD for the development of certain industries and the ability of the authorities to optimize these conditions

Rating of industries by availability of necessary and sufficient conditions (units)

Area of further industry analysis

Tourism

Manufacture of health products

Tourism

Food industry

Medicines for health

Light industry

Food industry

Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Mechanical Engineering

Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

C/H

Information services

Metallurgy

Educational services

Oil production and processing

Construction materials

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1,0

1,2

1,4

1,6

1,8

2,0

2,2

Availability of the necessary conditions for the development of the industry in the CBD, ed.

Source: Analytics of LLC "Strategy"

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

C/H

Construction materials

Light industry

Metallurgy

Oil production and processing

Mechanical Engineering

Educational services

Transport equipment

Information services

1

1

1

1

Industries that do not have the prerequisites for development in CBD. They are not considered further

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

on the

I and I and I and I and a and a and a and a and a

i t t o n o m o V

.

d e .

L with U

,

and l with a r t o e and t and with a r

3,0

2,5

2,0

1,5

1,0

0,5

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

2

2

Industry analysis showed that the activities of the most promising sectors for the development of the CBD economy are based on the use of the competitive advantages of the region.

17

The matrix of industry risks and its prospects for development in the CBD

Industries with high potential, but also with high risks

Tourism

Agriculture

Industries that need to be prioritized

Food industry and deep processing of agricultural raw materials

Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Construction materials

Light industry

Stabilizing industries

Metallurgy

Oil production and processing

* and l c a r t o

i and t and t and a r t t o n e n e e r e p

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

5,0

5,5

6,0

6,5

7,0

7,5

8,0

8,5

9,0

9,5

10,0

10,5

11,0

Industry Risk Resilience Index**

* Subject to the development of industries according to an optimistic scenario, in conventional units (See slide 63) ** In units (see slide 64)

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The content of activities, nomenclature and quality of products of future sectors of the economy will be radically different from the ones that have developed to date.

18

Existing economic sectors

Future economic sectors

Agriculture

Food industry

Pharmaceutics

Light industry

Tourism

Production of market-demanded crop and livestock products, their deep processing and receipt of products with high added value, belonging to the premium class and in demand in the domestic and foreign markets (vegetables, fruits, chilled sheep and cattle meat, high-quality feed, biofuels, etc.)

Production of therapeutic and preventive drugs and health-promoting products for consumption in the region and beyond. Production of all kinds of goods for tourists and vacationers

Sports and health tourism, offering a wide range of services for the prevention and treatment of various diseases. Hotels, sanatoriums and other tourist facilities of modern format

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Small business is one of the most important sectors of the economy with significant growth potential in the CBD

19

Small business can effectively contribute to addressing the employment problem in the CBD, especially in remote areas

Development trajectory: increasing the share of small businesses in GDP and total employment

Russia 2005

Russia 2003

CBD 2005

Russia 2004

Hungary

Poland

Croatia, Sweden

Germany

Great Britain France USA

Israel

Philippines

Italy

Mexico

Australia

Japan

China

Russia 2010 the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation*

Pakistan

I and I and R.

x and n d e r s

I'm going to go to D.

%

,

P V V

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Proportion of small and medium-sized enterprises in total employment, %

Stage of growth

Stage of maturity

In developing countries and countries of the former Soviet bloc

Small Business Segment Growth

In Eastern Europe after market reforms

the average annual growth rate of the sector was up to 50%

In developed countries, small business is stable

high share, being the basis of the economy

The share of employees in the sector ranges from 50 to 80%, and the contribution

sector in GDP - 40-60%

* Target declared by the Minister of Economic Development and Trade Gref

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Contents

20

1. The relevance of the development strategy of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

2. Prospective sectors of the economy

3. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy up to 2030

4. Prospects for the implementation of the Strategy

5. Annexes

1. Promising projects for implementation in the CBD

2. Industry analysis: selection of priority industries

3. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy

4. Current socio-economic situation of the CBD

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy until 2030

21

Existing alternatives to CBD development differ from each other primarily in the role that

The government is able to play in the development of the economy of the Republic, as well as how the future society of Kabardino-Balkaria sees its future

The alternative "inertial development" involves following the current development trends

economy, preserving its industry structure

Alternative "Center of tourism and recreation" provides for the accelerated development of tourism

a Recreational Complex with Exit 23 Years on 6,4 Millions of tourist visits. If this alternative is implemented, the development of agriculture and the food industry is focused primarily on ensuring domestic consumption, including the provision of food to the growing tourism sector

The alternative "CBD - the center of health and effective environmental management" provides

comprehensive development of the region, effective use of all its competitive advantages. In the case of this alternative, the development of tourism is guided by the average price segment, the positioning of the Republic as a region, which assumes wide opportunities for active recreation and health promotion. There is an exit through 23 the Year 3371 Thousands of tourist visits per year. Large-scale production of various therapeutic and preventive drugs based on local raw materials of plant, animal and mineral origin. Advanced development in the Republic of deep processing of agricultural raw materials, large-scale export of products with high added value outside the region

Analysis of these alternatives has shown that inertial development is not in the interests of economic development.

active population, business and society as a whole. Focusing only on the tourism sector of the economy carries great risks and will not solve, in particular, the problem of high-paying employment of the population.

The most attractive alternative is “CBD is a center for health and effective environmental management”.

Qualitative and quantitative analysis gave the best results

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The existing alternatives to the development of the CBD differ from each other in the role that the authorities are able to play in the development of the economy of the Republic, as well as in the way the future society of Kabardino-Balkaria sees its future.

22

Alternative to inertial development

Alternative "Center of Tourism and Recreation"

Alternative "CBD - the center of health and effective use of nature"

Tourism

Deep processing of agricultural raw materials

Manufacture of health products, pharmaceutical products

High-tech production of construction materials

Other sectors of economy

*

**

* APC is focused on domestic consumption ** AIC is focused on the production of premium and "export-oriented" products

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Primary priority

Priority

Inertial development

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The alternative "Inertial development" involves following the current trends in the development of the economy, preserving its sectoral structure.

23

Implementing this alternative means maintaining current trends and industry

the CBD Economy Structure

The tourism industry is developing mainly through private initiatives. There is no planned development of recreational zones in Nalchik and Prielbrusye that meet international standards

Food industry and agriculture work mainly on domestic,

Regional Market

The government only indirectly participates in the implementation of production development projects

Building Materials

The development (decline) of other sectors of the economy continues in line with the established

Trends

The government's efforts to improve the economy and economic relations have neither

neither sectoral nor social priorities

The volume and structure of public investment in the CBD economy are changing

Trends

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Alternative "Center of Tourism and Recreation"

24

The implementation of this alternative means:

- Forced development of tourist and recreational complex with exit

During 23 Years on 6,4 million tourist visits to Kabardino-Balkaria, which implies:

Significant modernization of the transport infrastructure of the region

- Forced construction of new and reconstruction of existing hotels,

sanatoriums, tourist bases in Prielbrus, on the "northern slope" and in Nalchik

Creation of modern ski slopes in Prielbrusye and on the northern

Slope

Advanced development in the CBD SPA-resort

. . . active development of services infrastructure in recreational areas; and

Entertainment

The focus of agriculture and food industry in the first

to meet the demands of the regional market, including the provision of food for the growing tourism sector

Development of production of building materials (in the format of small and medium-sized businesses) is subordinated to the needs of the tourism industry

Other industries are developing and under control

the Government of the CBD in the framework of the all-Russian industrial policy and the growth of the state order

The volume of investment from the federal budget in the economy of the CBD will be

2.5 billion dollars (mainly for developing tourism infrastructure), and up to 2.7 billion dollars from other sources.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The alternative "CBD - the center of health and effective environmental management" provides for the integrated use of all competitive advantages of the Republic.

25

Integrated development of the region and its transformation into a "health region":

Development of tourism with a preferential orientation to the average price segment and

positioning of the Republic as a region adapted for active recreation, health prevention and rehabilitation for 3,3 million people per year by the beginning of the 2025-ies; gradual development of the ski complex in Prielbrusye, on the "northern slope" and in the vicinity of the city. Nalchik; construction of SPA-resort on the territory of Nalchik and Gila-Su

Large-scale production of various therapeutic and preventive drugs based on local raw materials of plant and animal origin using modern biotechnology in the pharmaceutical and food industry

Advance development of agro-industrial complex and large-scale export

Products with high added value outside the region:

Production of chilled cattle and lamb

Production of juices, soft drinks, vegetables, fruits and other products

crop production, including canned, meeting the modern requirements of consumers for quality and ecology

Production of fuel alcohol and compound feed based on modern protein additives (in

DDGS)

High-tech production of building materials is developing at

active support of the authorities (including in the format of small and medium-sized businesses) with a focus on regional, interregional and national markets

Other industries are developing and actively supported

the Government of the CBD in the framework of the all-Russian industrial policy and the growth of the state order

The volume of investments from the federal budget in the economy of the CBD will be 1,5

billion dollars (mainly in the development of tourist infrastructure), and from other sources up to 1,6 billion dollars.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The definition of the preferred alternative should be based on the analysis of quantitative and qualitative criteria

26

Key stakeholders and their expectations

Government of the Russian Federation (Federal Government)

Minimization of federal budget expenditures

Support for the Subsidized Region

Improving the standard and quality of life of the population* - Ensuring high rates of sustainable living

Economic growth*

Capacity-building for future development* - Enhancing national security*

CBD Government (Regional Authority)

High standard of living of the population - High level of regional security

Budget own taxes

The region’s high attractiveness for

Investors and the economically active population

CBD Population

High level and quality of life - Opportunities for development and self-realization

CBD Business

A favorable climate for development and

Entrepreneurship Development

Quantitative criteria

1

Employment of the population

* Income of the population

Tax revenues (fullness)

budget)

Financial results (take into account the amount of

investments in alternative

Qualitative criteria

2

Sustainability of the economy in

Long term

> Compliance with the development goals of Russia,

the Russian Government*

Synergistic effect of development

CBD Economy for Other Regions of South Africa

* Methodological recommendations for the preparation of reports on the results and main activities of budget planning entities, Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, 2004 St Petersburg.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The alternative “CBD is the center of health and effective environmental management” is the most attractive option for the development of the CBD economy.

27

Selection criteria

"Inertial Development"

"Center for Tourism and Recreation"

"CBD - Center for Health and Effective Environmental Use"

Development indicators of CBD 2005

e e n e e e e t e h and l o C

e e e n e e e e c e a K

Employment of the population, % of the economically active population (by 2030)

Per capita income, ths rubles / month (by 2030 year)

CBD Consolidated Budget Endowment (by 2030)

Sustainability of the economy in the long term

Compliance with the objectives of the Government of the Russian Federation

Synergistic effect of CBD development for other regions of the SFD

67%

13,1

46%

ü ü

74%

3,3

65%

83%

19,9

36%

ü ü üü

ü

84,7%

26,5

25%

ü ü ü ü ü

üü

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Calculation of the main indicators of pessimistic, realistic and optimistic scenarios of economic development in the implementation of the alternative "CBD - the center of health and effective environmental management" *

28

Endowment** Budget (2030 g.), %

Unemployment rate (2030), %

35

27

25

18

15,3

3,3

Pessimistic Realistic Optimistic

Pessimistic Realistic Optimistic

GRP (2030 g.), billion rub.

Income of the population (2030), ths rubles/person.

240

256

351

25,3

26,5

34,2

GRP

Pessimistic Realistic Optimistic

Pessimistic Realistic Optimistic

* See chap. "Methodology, prerequisites and results of forecasting strategic alternatives for the development of the CBD economy"

**Hereafter, subsidisation refers to the difference between the expenditures and the CBD consolidated budget's own revenues attributable to the expenditures of the consolidated budget

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Contents

29

1. The relevance of the development strategy of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

2. Prospective sectors of the economy

3. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy up to 2030

4. Prospects for the implementation of the Strategy

5. Annexes

1. Promising projects for implementation in the CBD

2. Industry analysis: selection of priority industries

3. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy

4. Current socio-economic situation of the CBD

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Prospects for the implementation of the Strategy

30

During the upcoming 23 Over the years, the efforts of the authorities in the Republic will be aimed at creating a new, more efficient economy. Its development will be based on the unique features of Kabardino-Balkaria, as a result of which the average wage will grow in the future 7,3 times (s 3,8 to 28,5 The budget will be formed mainly from its own tax revenues (the provision of the regional budget with its own revenues will increase from the current year 35% to 75%)

In the Republic will be created in fact new industrial complexes for

production of healthy food products, therapeutic and preventive drugs, providing comprehensive tourist services for the treatment, promotion of health and recreation of the population of Russia and foreign guests of our country. High-tech production of construction materials with high added value, meeting modern environmental standards, will be launched in the Republic. In the Republic will be actively developed other sectors of the economy that provide employment of qualified personnel

The structure of the economy thus formed will ensure high and

The stable rate of its development (the average annual growth rate of GRP (2006-2030) will be 9%). The republic will become one of the most successful regions of the North Caucasus, characterized by high standards of quality of life (unemployment will decrease from 26% to 15,3%) and public safety.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Vision - Center for Health and Environmental Management

31

(cid:127) The highest life expectancy among the regions of Russia (cid:127) Uncompromising compliance with high environmental standards (cid:127) Developed sports and recreation infrastructure combining:

Unique and extensive opportunities for sports holidays in ski centers

(cid:127) (cid:127) High level of treatment and prophylactic and balneological services (cid:127)

World-class comprehensive medical services

(cid:127) Production of high-quality and in-demand medicines

products and food additives, including from local raw materials

(cid:127) Manufacture of other goods for health, sports and recreation (cid:127) Production of environmentally friendly food products, including from

the use of modern technologies of processing and packaging, as well as biotechnology

(cid:127) Availability of scientific schools and educational institutions in the field of medicine,

Spa and Sports

(cid:127) Developed system of training for tourist and sanatorium-resort

Organizations

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The goals of the regional executive power in the implementation of the strategic alternative "CBD - the center of health and effective environmental management"

32

Long-term goals up to 2030

Ensure high incomes and ensure high incomes and quality of life of the population

Ensure high rates of sustainable development of the CBD economy

Ensure high rates of sustainable development of the CBD economy

Increase the financial independence of the region

Increase the financial independence of the region

Strategic goals up to 2015

To form an economy structure capable of effectively using the competitive advantages of the CBD

To form an economy structure capable of effectively using the competitive advantages of the CBD

Increase the share of own tax revenues in the income of the CBD budget

Priority goals in economic development

Financial objectives

Increase the production of export-oriented products of the agricultural sector (including premium agricultural products (including the premium segment) segment)

Accelerated development of tourism

Accelerated development of tourism

Increase production of high-tech high-tech building materials

Increase production and increase the depth of processing processing of natural raw materials (ore, oil, etc.) (ores, oil, etc.)

Ensure that tax revenue is commensurate with the scale and efficiency of economic activity

Increase the level of the minimum wage and ensure the growth of wages and ensure the growth of the average wage in the budget sphere in the budget sphere

Objectives for infrastructure development and enterprise support

To provide conditions for mass implementation of the entrepreneurial initiative

Increase inflows Increase inflows of domestic and foreign domestic and foreign private investment

To create infrastructure, to create an infrastructure that provides 2030 by 2030, providing more than 1 million tour arrivals more than 1 million tour arrivals

To increase the attractiveness of products manufactured in CBD products and services in the domestic (in and services in the domestic (including state order), and foreign (including state order), and foreign market

To ensure the growth of the economy with its own energy resources

To ensure the advanced development of small-scale entrepreneurship

Objectives to improve the efficiency of the executive branch

Aims of the social block

Provide the authorities with highly qualified personnel at all levels

To organize the work of the executive power "on goals and benchmarks" (conduction of goals and benchmarks) (implementation of administrative reform)

To ensure a high level of health care, to ensure a high level of health care, social protection, education, science and culture of social protection, education, science and culture

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Objectives that ensure the achievement of priority goals in economic development

33

Increase production Increase production of export-oriented products of agro-industrial complex of agricultural products (including the premium segment) (including the premium segment)

To promote the creation of a modern (certified) meat processing plant capable of providing sustainable supplies of chilled meat for sale in national and global trade networks

To promote the implementation of projects for the production and export of bioethanol, the production of modern feed

and feed additives (based on bioethanol production waste), production of biofuels and other rapeseed products

Implement land reform that streamlines and improves efficiency

Land Use and Crop Optimization

To ensure accelerated growth in livestock production, increase in sheep and cattle

Provide state support (financial and organizational) to promotion programs

domestic and foreign markets of high-quality food products

Ensure high environmental standards are met

Develop a master plan for the territorial placement of production of goods and services for

information support of potential investors and provision of land plots to them

Accelerated development of tourism

Accelerated development of tourism

Provide state funding for advanced development of tourism infrastructure

(transport, protection against mudslides/lavins, provision of water, gas, electricity, sewage, construction of tracks, lifts and other facilities)

Ensure personal and environmental safety of tourists

Develop a comprehensive program for the creation and development of small and medium-sized production facilities

related goods and ensure its implementation

To ensure the promotion of tourism services within the country and abroad

Increase production Increase production of high-tech high-tech building materials

Increase production and increase the depth of processing of natural raw materials (ore, natural raw materials (ore, oil, etc.) oil, etc.)

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

To promote the construction of the Russian railway line to the city of Tyrnauz

Attract investors to create high-tech production of building materials

To promote the development of innovative entrepreneurship in the production of building materials

To clarify oil and gas reserves with public and private funds

Attract investors for the organization of mining and deep processing of minerals (oil, ore)

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Tasks on infrastructure

34

Provide support Provide support for successful businesses and successful businesses and entrepreneurial initiative initiatives

Ensure the inflow of domestic and foreign investments, foreign investments, promote the implementation of investment projects of investment projects

Create infrastructure, infrastructure that provides 2030 1,2 million tour 2030 1,2 million tour arrivals

To ensure the promotion of CBD products and services in CBD products and services in Russia (including state orders) and Russia (including state orders) and abroad. To form an image and to form an image and a brand of the Republic

Ensure growth of the economy with the necessary energy resources

To provide for the cutting development of small-scale entrepreneurs.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Provide targeted support for successful enterprises and entrepreneurial initiative (subsidies, compensation payments, state guarantees) > Promote products to the foreign market, expand and strengthen business ties > Provide PR support and public recognition of successful development of small and medium-sized businesses > Organize systematic training of qualified personnel

To form favorable investment legislation > To ensure guaranteed protection of investors' interests > To ensure active, personal participation of regional leaders in attracting key investors > To minimize bureaucratic barriers to the implementation of investment projects > To develop and implement a program for the development of telecommunications and communications in the CBD

To develop and implement a comprehensive program for the development of Prielbrus and the Northern slope of the city. Elbrus

- reconstruction of existing and construction of new cars and railways for the delivery of tourists - construction of avalanches and shelter structures - construction of ski slopes, lifts, balneological infrastructure

Develop and implement a comprehensive program for the development of the resort area of Nalchik (including

implementation of the "city" ski route project)

Create effective sales representative offices in major cities of Russia and abroad to develop and conduct (on a regular basis) advertising and PR companies to improve the image

Republic, brand formation and its promotion

To promote the production of light industry and state engineering enterprises

Orders

Promote the comprehensive and rational development of the hydropower potential of the CBD

Ensure equal, transparent and prompt access to enterprises and tourist facilities

Energy Capabilities

Implement a set of measures to create a favorable business climate

Build an effective small business support infrastructure

Develop and implement a small business support system through a franchising mechanism

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Tasks on Finance and Executive Power

35

Finance

Ensure that tax revenues are commensurate with the scale and efficiency of economic activity

Increase the level of the minimum wage and ensure the growth of wages and ensure the growth of the average wage in the economy and wages in the economy and the budgetary sphere

Executive branch

Provide the authorities with highly qualified qualified personnel at all levels

Organize the work of the executive branch "on the executive branch" on goals and control goals and control indicators "(conducting indicators" (administrative reform) of administrative reform)

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Increase the efficiency of tax administration to form a new culture of legal business

To ensure a gradual increase in the level of the minimum wage, to consistently increase the share of “legal” wages

To create a system of motivation to certify employees to improve the efficiency of systems of training and training of young professionals

Develop a system of goals and benchmarks

To bring the organizational structure of government bodies in line with strategic goals and objectives

CBD

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

In the 70-ies economic science began to associate the success of development with the formation of the so-called clusters. State support for clustering has fundamentally changed the face of the national economy, for example, a country like Finland.

36

The state is responsible for the implementation of an active policy to support the creation and development of clusters:

In the socialist economy

the analogue of the cluster was the territorial-production complex, which, unlike the market prototype, was created directively, with all the inherent shortcomings of the command economy

The cluster is

a group of geographically adjacent and functionally interconnected companies characterized by common activities and complementing each other; successful firms that produce products and services; suppliers that exist in the region. All of them operate in a favorable business climate in a market economy cluster is formed under the influence of many factors of objective and subjective nature.

The role of regional authorities in the formation of a successful cluster is to timely "detect" opportunities for its formation and provide comprehensive support to initiatives for its development, to involve in this process the intellectual potential of the region, to stimulate its constituent enterprises to produce export-oriented and highly competitive products.

Provide support in the creation of supplier enterprises for manufacturers of final products and the development of "outsourcing"

Leading companies

Key companies exporting goods and services outside the region

Network of supplier companies

Companies that provide "leaders" with raw materials, raw materials, components and specialized services

Business climate

Resources/Economic basis of activities

Human resources

Technology

Access to capital Infrastructure

Source: M. Porter, The Clusters White Book, National Competitiveness Institute, Bauman Innovation

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Creating a favorable business climate implies:

. . . . all necessary conditions

for the creation and conduct of business in the region; - the possibility of registration of new companies in the shortest possible time and the low cost of the relevant services;

reasonable cost of rental housing; and

non-residential premises;

high level and quality of life; ? security guarantees for business and

Population;

Ensuring equal access to sources

energy;

high quality of labor resources; availability of scientific and production base; high quality of transport and

Telecommunications infrastructure

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The implementation of the alternative "CBD - Health Center" will significantly accelerate the formation of three clusters in the Republic

37

Cluster "Health", which includes a wide range of companies for the production of goods and services related to the development of sports, mining, sports, environmental, contemplative tourism with a balneological component, as well as high-tech and preventive drugs and other products that improve the production of medical health, based on natural local raw materials (grass, mud, mineral water, etc.) The formation of the cluster will provide a comprehensive use of tourism and recreational potential of the Republic

Cluster "Agro-industrial complex", uniting production for deep processing of agricultural raw materials and providing high quality premium products with high added value, which is in growing demand in the domestic and foreign markets Formation of the cluster will allow to put agricultural production on a modern basis, integrate it with the processing of products, to give sustainability to the development of the industry, to ensure its high competitiveness, and workers employed in the industry - decent income

Cluster "Extraction and processing of natural raw materials", which includes enterprises for complex and deep processing of minerals The formation of the cluster will allow using the most advanced technologies that ensure the proper depth and complexity of the development of ore and non-ore deposits in the Republic in compliance with all environmental requirements, significantly increase the added value of products, increase its competitiveness

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The study of international experience allows us to identify the most important factors for the success of public policy aimed at the formation and intensive development of clusters.

38

Formalization of public policy towards clusters taking into account country (regional) and industry specifics - Identification of long-term goals for the functioning and evolution of clusters (inclusion of cluster development programs in the strategy)

Development of the country/region)

Development of communications between the main components of the cluster: companies, government bodies, scientific and technical

educational community, financial organizations, trade associations, etc.

Support from the state cluster initiatives (at least at the stage of formation of the cluster) - Active use of the state order as a tool to support clusters - Development of scientific and educational base, expansion of access to state research and development, stimulation of cooperation of educational

the Complex and Real Economy Sector

Development of innovative infrastructure (incubators, science parks, special economic zones) > Marketing policy and presentation of clusters in foreign markets > Ensuring access of cluster participants to information

Source: The Clusters White Book, National Competitiveness Institute, International Organization for Knowledge Economy and Enterprise Development

Critical factors of cluster formation and development success

Mutual cooperation and partnership Innovative technologies Quality of labor resources Physical infrastructure Presence of large companies Entrepreneurial initiative Availability of sources of financing Professional services Access to markets Business support Competition Accessibility of information Communications Leadership Information technologies External economic factors

a x e s y r o t a F

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

% of sources that mention the factor

Source: A Practical Guide to Cluster Development A Report to the Department of Trade and Industry and the English RDAs by Ecotec Research & Consulting

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

All companies that form the cluster receive state support in one form or another

39

Companies-leaders The state can use various forms of support:

> Attracting Direct

Foreign investors, (Maquiladoras in Chihuahua, Malaysia IT Super Corridor)

Export support,

delegations-participants of international exhibitions, (India Software) - Public sponsorship of joint brands, market development campaigns, etc. (Marketing Canadian Wine)

> Provision of services

Export credit and finance (Spain fund for international disputes IP)

Modern clusters can be competitive only if the most modern technologies are used. Innovation is the key to success

Government Needs State Policy to Support the Formation and Development of Regional Clusters

Power

Companies

The environment of mutual action

Finance

Science

The state authorities contribute to the establishment of links between companies and institutions that form a cluster and are able to join it:

By creating a platform for dialogue

(Science Parks, Incubators; eg. Bangalore, India. Austin, Texas, Stanford Research Park)

* By encouraging and helping to establish contacts; (Vinnova, Sweden, UK Incubation Challenge Fund, Pro-Inno Germany)

(Barcelona)

Through training and provision

Information (Competence Systems, Sweden, Italy)

The role of the state: attracting large financial institutions to the region, reducing their risks, stimulating financial market development

Source: Adapted from Sjelvell et al. (2003); IKED (International Organization for Knowledge Economy and Enterprise Development)

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The strategy provides for the development of tourism in the CBD in sports and health and medical areas

40

Availability of CBD resources

Current trends

Tourism

Peace

Russia

Cruise tourism is a fast-growing type of tourism, but in absolute terms it occupies a small share of the entire market.

Types of tourism based on cultural, historical or natural features of the region

Tourism

Types of tourism based on visits to artificial structures or events

Rapidly growing and promising direction

Growing direction Non-growing/stagnant direction Declined direction

Beach tourism

Cruise (water, bus)

Sports and active tourism

Health and Wellness Tourism

Cultural and educational tourism

Ecological tourism

Extreme and adventure tourism

Amusement parks

Event tourism

Conference tourism

Shopping tourism

Gambling tourism

û ü ü ü û ü ü ü ü û û û

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Source: Expertise Ghh-consult, Analytics LLC "Strategy"

The strategy provides for the development of tourism in the CBD, taking into account the peculiarities of traditional and new resort areas in the North Caucasus.

41

Rostov region

Kalmykia

Astrakhan region.

Sea of Azov

Black Sea

Krasnodar

Arkhyz

Investment amount: 1,1 billion US dollars.

Capacity:

30 thousand people/day

Maykop

The creation of the Adler-Cherkessk-Nalchik highway will strengthen the consolidation of tourist areas in the North Caucasus and will cause a synergistic effect

Stavropol

KMV (Kislovodsk, Pyatigorsk, Essentuki)

Number of arrivals: 2,5 million to 2030

Cherkessk

Grozny

Nalchik

Vladikavkaz

Caspian Sea

Makhachkala

Sochi and Krasnaya Polyana Mining and Recreation Complex

Investment amount: 12 billion US dollars.

Number of arrivals: 6 million people

Dombay Ski Center

Investment: 1 billion dollars

Georgia

Greater Caucasus

The basin of Caucasian mineral waters

Rocky Ridge

Centers of subjects of Federation

Sources: Statements, No 218 November 2006g; Expert magazine, No38 16 Oct., 2006g; Region-Inform news agency 19 Dec. 2006 St Petersburg.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Azerbaijan

On the territory of the CBD there are a number of promising tourist sites, the most large-scale of which are the Prielbrusye and the Nalchik balneological zone.

42

5

BAKSAN

FRESH

MAISKY

CZEGEM

NARTKAL

TALKER

1

TEREK

3

TURNIAUZ

Elbrus

2

6

7

4

8

9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Nalchik resort and recreational balneological zone

Mining and Recreation Complex Prielbrusje

Northern slopes of Elbrus - creation of a multidisciplinary ski resort using healing springs of Djila Su

The Bezengi Wall is five five thousandths of seven, located in the North Caucasus. Mountaineering routes of various difficulty categories are laid - up to 6A and 6B

Lake Tambukan - creation of a medical and health complex based on healing muds

Blue lakes - one of the deepest lakes in Russia

Chegem waterfalls,

Auschiger is a unique source of nitrogen-bromide thermal hot water

Upper Balkaria

*Analysis and estimated rates of tourism industry deployment are given in the industry analysis

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Description of prospective tourist and recreational zones of KBR*

43

The North Side. Elbrus.

The development of Elbrus region is associated with large-scale investments in the construction of an all-season highway (120 km.), power line (100 km.), gas pipeline (100 km.), sewage treatment system, mini airfield. Advantages:

The shortest distance to m. Kislovodsk, which will provide an influx of tourists from the region KMV - Undeveloped currently the northern slope of the city. Elbrus has great opportunities for the construction of lifts, and other

Ski Infrastructure

In terms of capacity, the northern slope is comparable to the already developed slopes in the Azau valley . Sources of thermal water of Dzhilysu, located in close proximity to the northern slopes, allow creating a comprehensive

ski and balneological zone.

The tourist capacity of Elbrus is calculated taking into account the development of the Baksan Valley, the gorges and slopes adjacent to it throughout the city. Turnause to Elbrus. On this site, along with the existing ropeways and bogie lifts, including 2-y and 3-th queue of the new gondola cable car (Old Outlook - World) and six-seater cable car (Mir - Gara-Bashi), it is possible to build new ski slopes with the necessary infrastructure.

Due to climate change in the Caucasus region, it is advisable to provide artificial snow removal from remote glacial zones

ski runs, which will extend the season by 2 months.

Maximum capacity of all slopes. Elbrus (including the Northern) and other gorges of the Baksan Valley: 35 000 people. - In an alternative to "CBD - health center" in a moderate scenario, the capacity of the Elbrus region will be 21 000 skiers.

Nalchik resort area (cid:127) There are currently 7,5 thousand beds. Considering that most of the resort area needs a root

reconstruction in accordance with modern requirements of comfort, the number of beds in 2030 Year adopted at the level 6 thousands (realistic scenario). In an optimistic scenario, the number of beds - 7,5 thousands.

(cid:127) It is necessary to organize balneological treatment in each health resort, but in the presence of a general resort treatment and diagnostic center.

In addition, it is necessary to create hotels and sanatoriums of modern formats focused on recreation and health promotion.

(cid:127) It is advisable to develop ski slopes in the South-West region of the city. Nalchik and in the ski slope of Sary-Tala in 18 km. from

Mr. Nalchik. In 1988-90 there was an attempt to develop the slope. In working condition were 3 bugels, and tourists were delivered from the tourist base of Dolinsk. The road and the power line are brought to the slope. The project requires further development.

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The development strategy of resorts in the CBD provides for a synergistic effect from interaction with the Cavminvods and the Red Glade, as well as a special positioning in specialization and price.

44

Synergy

● Integration (entry) into

the overall system of ski resorts. Rotation of tourist contingents (exchange of tourists)

The Creation of North Caucasus

tourist highways, exchange of tourists and tours

Characteristics of CBD

The presence of mountain-balneologists-

the Czech Complex

The competitiveness of

Price/quality ratio

Dombay, Arkhyz

Synergy

The Creation of North Caucasus

tourist highways, exchange of tourists and tours

Characteristics of CBD

> Orientation to

the average Russian consumer (as opposed to the more expensive Krasnaya Polyana)

The CBD has more

various ski slopes, allowing, in particular, to hold competitions in giant slalom

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Sochi, Krasnaya Polyana

Mineralnye Vody

Essentuki

Pyatigorsk

Kislovodsk

CBD

Synergy

Offer of skis,

Mountaineering, environmental and excursion tours to the CBD for holidaymakers in the KMV

.Inclusion of Nalchikskaya and others

balneological zones of the CBD as part of the tourist product of the KMV. Joint promotion of balneological treatment and prevention

Use of the transport hub. Mineral Waters for the transit of tourists to the CBD

The Creation of North Caucasus

tourist highways, exchange of tourists and tours

Characteristics of CBD

Promotion of own brand

"health center", development of own distribution of tours, development of own system of transport communications

Wide offer of various types of sports and health tourism, in contrast to the more "medical" and medical specialization of KMV

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The strategy provides for state support for the development of the tourism industry, in particular, in the form of organizing a broad advertising campaign of opportunities open to domestic and foreign tourists.

45

Tourism

One of the most effective ways to promote is the organization of tourism offices

Budgets of tourism offices, millions of dollars

25

20

15

10

5

0

a B E

A C A A A A A A A A

a n o e e s r a B

the University of St Petersburg

n and l r e B

Ph D C

g r in b r e t e P

Funding by Authority

Private capital

Functions of tourism offices:

Interaction with travel agencies in key tourism markets and ensuring their interaction with tourism operators in the region

Promotion of the tourist product of the region in the audience

potential tourists and travel agencies

Source: Tourism Development Strategy, St. Petersburg, BCG, 2005

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Along with the program to improve the image of the Republic, an advertising campaign is needed to promote the tourism product of the CBD in other regions of the Russian Federation and foreign countries.

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The strategy provides for the qualitative improvement of the agro-industrial complex of the CBD and the production of high-quality products in demand on the all-Russian and world markets.

46

APK

Increase in GRP

Production of mass products in highly competitive markets

Production of premium products with high added value

The main part of added value is created in the processing of agricultural raw materials

The scale of Kabardino-Balkaria does not allow it to become a significant player in the mass food market of Russia

Based on raw materials

Based on imported raw materials

The creation of a processing enterprise operating on imported raw materials and marketing products in other regions contradicts the global trend.

Premium segment and export-oriented product groups (shown in color)

Potential for Segment Increase

Level of competition

Availability of market entry conditions

Summary assessment of competitiveness

Market volume

*

Bread Bread Products Products Vegetables and Vegetables and melons

Main Main product groups

Fruits and berries Fruits and berries

Meat Meat Milk and Dairy Milk and Dairy Products Eggs

Sugar and confectionery Sugar and confectionery products

Fish and fish products Fish and fish products

Alcohol Alcohol

Liquor Distillery Products

Soft drinks Soft drinks

Source: Analytics of LLC "Strategy"

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The strategy provides for the growing participation of the CBD Government (following the example of foreign countries) in promoting republican products to foreign markets.

47

APK

The Canada Beef Export Federation –

1997 is an organization that promotes and organizes the supply of meat from Alberta to Mexico.

Example

Supply of beef Alberta, thousand tons

+29%

53 000

72 000

12 000

Functions:

> Establishing business relationships with customers > Creating an image

Goods

Quality control > Search for promising markets and segments

> Interaction with

1997

2002

2004

Power

Parma Ham Consortium is a long-term organization dedicated to the promotion of Italian consumer goods in the US and Europe

Functions:

Example

> Forming an image

Goods

Advertising campaigns for the promotion of goods

* Identification of counterfeit

Products

> Quality control

Products produced under this brand

Source: Marketing: Whose job? (Blue Planet Report), 2006

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

The structure of costs for the promotion of exports of food industry products in the world, 2002, million dollars.

1 530

Industry

71%

State

29%

390

59%

41%

320

66%

34%

820

77%

23%

In the world

Europe

USA

Other

Food industry (private funds)

State

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The strategy provides for the accelerated development of high-tech 48 production of facing materials, dry building mixtures, wall materials and cement

Construction materials

Market volume

Potential to expand the segment

Value added level

Availability of market entry conditions

Summary assessment of complicity

Possible Segments

Facing Materials Facing Materials

Dry construction mixes Dry construction mixes

Roofing materials Roofing materials

Wall Materials Wall Materials

Precast Concrete Precast Concrete

Cement Cement

Non-metallic raw materials Non-metallic raw materials

Any production of construction materials on the territory of the CBD must meet the most

High environmental requirements

The main requirements for the creation of new industries - the use of progressive

Technology and high competitiveness

Source: Analytics of LLC "Strategy"; interviews with experts

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The strategy provides for state support for entrepreneurial initiative primarily in strategically important areas of the region’s development.

49

Projects that have already expressed

Entrepreneur Interest*

Forms of support by the authorities for entrepreneurial initiative

Tribal and meat sheep and cattle

Construction of a certified meat processing plant

Production of modern feed, fuel alcohol and fuel additives

Production of rapeseed processing

Production of pharmaceuticals

Promising projects are also the development of tourist areas of the CBD, the development of parapharmaceutical production, the extraction of granite gravel, oil production and refining, cement production based on environmentally friendly technologies.

*See annex

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Temporary tax preferences

Co-financing of prospective

projects

Promotion of products of enterprises

in the Russian and international markets

● Advocating for enterprises’ interests

the region at the federal level

Ensuring the timely return of VAT to enterprises exporting products to foreign countries

> Facilitate business relationships with

companies and administrations of other regions and foreign countries

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The strategy provides for the mandatory formation of a new image of the CBD as a successfully developing, reliable and safe region for living and recreation in Russia.

50

Improving the image of the CBD both in Russia and abroad depends on comprehensive and targeted actions of the authorities.

A survey conducted by the Public Opinion Foundation showed that almost half of Russians perceive the situation in the CBD as unstable*

"Can the situation in the CBD become as tense as in Chechnya?"

Difficult to answer

28%

44%

Yeah.

27%

none

* The survey was conducted in November 2005 years

We need to change the image

Source: Analytics of "Strategy" LLC; research of "Public Opinion" Foundation

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

The main directions of formation of the image of the Republic

Reliable and economically stable region for strategic partners

Safe, environmentally friendly picturesque region for family and individual holidays

Republic, managed by a highly professional team of modern professionals

Enterprises of the region are reliable partners for conducting profitable business

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The creation of a franchise-based system of small enterprises can significantly contribute to the development of small business in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

51

The sequence of the project to create a franchise network of small businesses in the CBD. The most promising areas include: mini-shops in the food industry, the construction materials industry, light industry and health products, the service sector

Selection of the most promising business ideas for the Republic

Launch of pilot project

Project preparation for scaling

Selection of entrepreneurs, territorial placement

Networking

Coordination: President and Government and CBD

Support from the Federal Government

Private investors

“Franchise networks, due to their structural features, present the state with significantly greater opportunities to purposefully influence the development of small business” G.B. Kochetkov, Head of the Center for Management Problems of the Institute of the USA and Canada RAS

Features of the franchise business allow to minimize the risks of a small enterprise

Staff training, consulting support

Well-functioning business model and operational processes

Complex technological equipment

Staff training, consulting support

Adequate market assessment and business planning

Providing sales through centralized promotion and marketing support

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Significant reduction of small business risks

Additional benefits

Opportunities to attract cheaper funding

Improving the “survival” of small enterprises and their profitability

More effective performance of social functions (employment)

The past “school of entrepreneurship” will be able to further develop their own business

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The scientific and educational complex will play a key role for the development of the future economy of Kabardino-Balkaria

52

Scientific and educational complex

is of strategic importance for the development of the CBD:

(cid:127) An industry of high social significance,

Impact on employment and income

(cid:127) Key value in elevation

competitiveness of the Republic (personnel and scientific potential)

(cid:127) The basis for the development of modern,

the Innovation Economy

(cid:127) Providing highly qualified

Accelerated Development of Priority Industries

Objectives for the development of the NOC:

Implementation of the national project "Education" (improving the quality of education, motivating teachers and students)

Strengthening the material and technical base of educational institutions, providing highly qualified personnel

Development of cooperation of CBD universities, student exchange programs, study abroad opportunities

Opening of branches of leading educational institutions in the Republic

Creation of infrastructure to support innovative business ("new economy") - business incubators, technoparks

Main directions of NOC development

(cid:127) Effective management of the industry based on a system of goals and benchmarks (cid:127) Development of a program for the development of the scientific and educational complex in accordance with a long-term strategy

Development of the Republic

(cid:127) Active modernization of the industry using federal and regional budgets,

Public-Private Partnerships

(cid:127) Measures to attract new and retain existing highly qualified

Staff

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

As a result of the implementation of the Strategy, the share of employed in high-wage sectors will be increased in the CBD economy

53

54

54

55

54

47

39,2

23

17,2

7,5

5,6

3,7

5,2

4,5

2,8

8,7

5,9

7 5,9

6,4

) . St Petersburg 0 3 0 2 - 6 0 0 2 (

.

rubles

.

S and T

,

a l l i a n t o a r a Z

Comparison of the structure of employed and wages

payments by economic sectors in 2006 and 2030

39

28

37

31,4

22

20

27

18

4,4

4,7

3,5 4,3

8,8

3,4

Pharmaceuticals Tourism Construction

Food Industry Science Building Materials

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Electric Power

Other sectors of economy

Trade and marketing

Utilities

Agriculture

Transport and communications

Mechanical Engineering

Metallurgy

Small Business

Light industry

Number of employees, % (2006 - 2030)

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Under the most likely scenario, the CBD will reach the current level of GDP per capita of countries such as Argentina and Venezuela by 2030, and China will outpace the rate of growth.

54

GDP per capita and average GDP growth in the world

12%

10%

Kazakhstan

CBD 2030

China

8%

CBD 2005

Russian Federation

Belarus

India Ethiopia

Bulgaria

Philippines

Republic of Korea

Hong Kong, China

Slovak Republic

Hungary

Chile

Nicaragua

Brazil

Poland Mexico

Czech Republic

Venezuela

Malta

Kenya

Argentina

Israel

Portugal

Canada United Kingdom

Spain

USA

France

Japan

Germany

5 000

10 000

15 000

20 000

25 000

30 000

35 000

40 000

45 000

GDP per capita, dollars, 2004

6%

4%

2%

0%

0

4 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 2

a c e e e e e r c %

, St Petersburg 0 0 0 2 X A C

the P V V A T C O R M E T

Source: World Bank Development Indicators Database, Analytics of "Strategy"

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The strategy will significantly improve the efficiency of government decisions

55

Expected impact of implementation

Initiatives:

• Strategic Effect - Conformity

the Government Strategic Priorities Initiative

• Economic effect • Social effect • Emotional effect

Initiatives

Risks: • Budget • Legal • Organizational • Other (environmental, political,

The natural...)

Activities included in the plans of the Government and Municipalities

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Contents

56

1. The relevance of the development strategy of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

2. Prospective sectors of the economy

3. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy up to 2030

4. Prospects for the implementation of the Strategy

5. Annexes

1. Industry analysis: selection of priority industries

2. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy

3. Current socio-economic situation of the CBD

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Summary

57

In terms of growth and productivity, the most promising sectors in the global economy are pharmaceuticals, information technology and transport equipment manufacturing.

In terms of employment and value added, the most

promising in the world economy are medical, educational and information services

The possibility of developing new sectors of the economy of the Republic is determined by the presence of the necessary conditions and the ability of the authorities to optimize these conditions.

Among the "traditional" industries that exist in the Republic, the authorities deserve special attention those in which products are manufactured that are competitive in foreign markets and that can positively affect the development of other industries (producing a significant synergistic effect).

In this view, the most promising sectors of the economy are

tourism, food industry, oil production and refining, production of building materials. This Strategy provides for the priority development of tourism with related industries, agro-industrial complex and production of building materials until 2030.

Various scenarios for the development of promising industries, taking into account

Various measures of associated risks

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

In terms of growth rates and productivity in the global economy, pharmaceuticals, information technology and the production of transport equipment are the most dynamically developing.

58

Labour productivity and industry growth in the EU 1993-2003

Labor productivity and industry growth rates in the United States 1998-2004

Productivity

Productivity

105

100

95

90

85

80

75

70

65

60

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

Pharmaceutics

The most attractive

Chemical industry

Information services

Medical services Extraction of non-energy minerals

Transport equipment

C/X Mechanical Engineering

Household instrumentation

Educational services

Woodworking prom.

Production of furniture, etc.

Attractive

The least attractive

300

280

260

240

220

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

Pharmaceutics

The most attractive

Information services

Non-energy mining

Transport equipment

Chemical industry

Woodworking industry

Attractive

Production of furniture, etc.

The least attractive

Medical services

Educational services

0 0,000

0,025

0,050

Growth rate

0,075

0 -0,025

0,100

0,000

0,025

0,050

0,075

0,100

Growth rate

The most promising industries for development are

Pharmaceutics

Information services

Transport equipment

Source: Eurostat, US Census Bureau

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

In terms of employment and value added, health, education and information services are the most promising for development

59

Number of employed and value added industries in the EU 1993-2003

Busy, thousands

Busy, thousands

Number of employed and value added industries in the United States 1998-2004

17000

16000

15000

14000

13000

12000

11000

10000

9000

8000

7000

6000

Medical services

The most attractive

Attractive

Information services

5000

Least Attractive

4000

3000

2000

1000

0 0,2

Transport equipment

Chemical industry

Woodworking industry Manufacture of furniture, etc.

Household instrumentation

Educational services

Pharmaceutics

C/X Mechanical Engineering

Extraction of non-energy. fossils

0,4

0,6

Share of value added in revenue

16000

15000

14000

13000

12000

11000

10000

9000

8000

7000

6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

0

0

Medical services

The most attractive

Attractive

The least attractive

Information services

Chemical industry

Transport equipment

Pharmaceutics

Woodworking industry

Production of furniture, etc.

Educational services

Non-energy mining

Share of value added in revenue

The most attractive industries are

Medical services

Educational services

Information services

Source: Eurostat, US Census Bureau

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Among the priorities should be the industries that have the best conditions for development in the CBD, high export potential and can have a significant synergistic effect.

60

Industries

Medical services

Food industry

Agriculture

Mechanical Engineering

Tourism

Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Educational services

Information services

Construction materials

Metallurgy

Light industry

Oil production and processing

Criteria: > The availability of conditions for the development of the industry in the CBD > The ability of the authorities to influence the development of the industry > The positive impact of the industry on the development of other industries > The contribution of the industry to the economy to 2030 under the most favorable development scenario

Industry 1

Industry 2

Industry 3

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Industries that can give the maximum synergistic effect include tourism, food industry, medical services

61

The possibility of export-oriented industries to become cluster-forming

Industry ranking (by synergistic effect)

Tourism

4

Tourism

Food industry

a c and c c c u d o r p

a t r o p c e

i t t o n o m o V

12

10

Agriculture

.

D E

Medical services

Food industry

.

L with U

,

R B K e l e e r p

Metallurgy

Pharmaceutics

Light industry

8

6

Oil production and processing 4

Construction materials 2

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

The region’s need for industry-specific products

Medical services

Metallurgy

Pharmaceutics

Agriculture

Light industry

Oil production and processing

Construction materials

1

3

3

2

2

2

2

2

Source: Analytics of LLC "Strategy"

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The analysis shows that tourism and agriculture will make the greatest contribution to the economy of the CBD in 2030.

62

Comparison of the tax return and the number of employees to 2030 the Year*

Tax deductions, million rubles.

1 000

900

800

Tourism

Food industry

Construction materials

700

Medical services

600

Pharmaceutics

Industry contribution to the economy rating 2030

Tourism

Food industry

C/H

Construction materials

Medical services

Pharmaceutics

3

3

3

3

2

2

1

1

500

400

300

200

100

0

Oil production and processing

Light industry

Agriculture

Oil production and processing

0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

Light industry

*Based on industry development forecast for 2030 year under optimistic scenario

Employment, thousand people.

Great contribution

Average contribution

Low contribution

Source: Analytics of LLC "Strategy"

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Tourism and agriculture - the most promising industries for development in the CBD

63

Cluster-building potential of industries

Rating of industries according to the necessary conditions of development

Industry contribution to the economy rating 2030

Tourism Food industry

Medical services

Metallurgy

Pharmaceutics

Agriculture

Light industry Oil production and processing Building materials

2

2

2

2

2

1

4

3

3

Tourism Food industry

Medical services

Pharmaceutics

C/X Building materials

Light industry

Metallurgy Oil production and processing

2

2

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

Tourism Food industry

C/X Construction Materials Medical Services

Pharmaceuticals Oil production and processing

Metallurgy

Light industry

3

3

3

3

2

2

1

1

1

The resulting industry outlook rating

Tourism

Food industry

Medical services

C/H

Construction materials

Pharmaceutics

Light industry

Oil production and processing

Metallurgy

11

10

10

8

7

7

6

5

5

Source: Analytics of LLC "Strategy"

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The development of each sector of the CBD economy is subject to certain risks

64

1.Fall of the world oil price

2.Removal of barriers to entry to the Russian market of Western players in connection with the entry into WTO, increase in imports

3.The growth of tension in the Caucasus (terrorism, political instability, etc.) and as a result - low tourist and investment attractiveness of the region

4.Unfavorable natural factors: natural disasters, epidemics, etc.

and n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n

I am in and p.

e e e e e e e e e r t C

A and R and M

e o c e e e e e e c

I'm in the X

M with R in T

3

1

9

9

1

9

1

9

3

6

1

1

3

3

3

1

i and r y l l t e M

3

3

3

1

Industry development risk exposure

Least risk exposure

Average risk exposure

The highest risk exposure

a c and t in e c a m r a F

3

3

6

6

and n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n

I am a Mr L

and a b e e e e e e e e e e e

a c c c b a r e r e p

e and c n and c and d e M

and g y y y y

3

9

1

1

9

1

3

3

3

1

9

9

0,4 0,4

Industry Stability Index

Building materials Metallurgy Food industry Oil production and processing Light industry Pharmaceuticals Agriculture Medical services Tourism

0,3

0,3

0,3

0,2

0,2

0,2 0,2

Source: Analytics of LLC "Strategy"

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Contents

65

1. The relevance of the development strategy of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

2. Prospective sectors of the economy

3. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy up to 2030

4. Prospects for the implementation of the Strategy

5. Annexes

1. Industry analysis: selection of priority industries

2. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy

3. Current socio-economic situation of the CBD

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Modeling the results of the alternative "Inertial development"

66

Structure of the CBD economy in 2030 in the implementation of the alternative "Inertial development"

168 810

283 707

17 407

16,70%

3,00% 3,80% 5,00%

7,60%

4,50%

23,60%

2,90% 3,30%

7,50%

6,70%

13,10%

0,90%

0,50%

0,10%

0,30% 0,60%

1,10%

0,90%

0,00% 0,30%

38,30%

6,70% 3,90%

11,60%

2,30%

1,60%

2,00%

27,70%

1,10%

1,50% 0,20%

0,60% 0,30%

38,80%

2,60% 3,00%

9,80%

6,30% 3,30%

16,00%

3,60%

4,70% 5,60%

1,30%

1,40% 0,50%

0,40%

0,90%

0,80% 1,20%

Turnover*, million rubles

Busy, man.

Taxes, million rubles

Agriculture

Food industry

Mechanical Engineering

Metallurgy

Light industry

Construction materials

Small Business

Pharmaceutics

Tourism

Science

Oil production and refining

Electric Power

Construction

Trade and marketing

Transport and communications

Utilities

Other sectors of economy

* Here and beyond - turnover by medium and large enterprises (except for the small business sector)

Source: Analytics of LLC "Strategy"

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Modeling the results of the alternative "Center of Tourism and Recreation"

67

The structure of the CBD economy in 2030 in the implementation of the alternative "Center for Tourism and Recreation"

506 440

348 158

1,20%

0,30%

16,70%

2,20% 4,20% 2,90% 2,60%

18,80%

39,10%

0,00%

0,10%

0,50%

3,10% 2,20% 4,40%

0,60% 1,10%

1,10%

0,70%

0,00%

0,50%

31,20%

14,00%

2,90%

13,50%

6,30%

0,30%

1,50%

1,40% 0,20%

1,60%

1,30%

1,00% 0,30%

22,60%

51 247

13,20%

1,30% 4,90%

10,90%

3,50% 3,00%

20,40%

32,60%

0,80%

0,50%

1,00% 0,70%

3,20% 2,60%

0,70%

0,40%

Turnover*, million rubles

Busy, man.

Taxes, million rubles

Agriculture

Food industry

Mechanical Engineering

Metallurgy

Light industry

Construction materials

Small Business

Pharmaceutics

Tourism

Science

Oil production and refining

Electric Power

Construction

Trade and marketing

Transport and communications

Utilities

Source: Analytics of LLC "Strategy"

Other sectors of economy

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Modelling of the results of the implementation of the alternative "CBD - Center for Health and Environmental Management"

68

The structure of the CBD economy in 2030 in the implementation of the alternative "CBD - Health Center"

0,10%

1,10%

575 074

16,70%

2,00% 4,50% 2,90% 2,10%

34,20%

1,10%

1,40%

0,10%

1,00% 1,40%

1,40%

17,80%

3,30% 3,80% 6,10%

356 863

30,40%

15,50%

1,40%

16,90%

3,90%

1,00%

1,60%

20,70%

1,50%

1,00% 0,60%

1,80% 0,30%

60 702

11,10%

1,10% 4,30%

11,10%

3,50% 2,30%

35,70%

14,70%

2,90% 4,10%

2,30%

0,40%

1,90%

0,50%

1,40%

1,60%

0,90%

1,70%

0,00% 0,80%

Turnover*, million rubles

Busy, man.

Taxes, million rubles

Agriculture

Food industry

Mechanical Engineering

Metallurgy

Light industry

Construction materials

Small Business

Pharmaceutics

Tourism

Science

Oil production and refining

Electric Power

Construction

Trade and marketing

Transport and communications

Utilities

Other sectors of economy

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Comparison of alternatives

69

168 810

506 440

575 074

3,00%

0,90%

0,30% 0,50%

16,70%

3,80% 5,00%

7,60%

4,50%

23,60%

2,90%

7,50%

6,70%

13,10%

0,10%

0,60% 3,30%

1,20%

0,00%

0,10%

16,70%

4,20% 2,90%

18,80%

39,10%

0,60%

3,10%

2,20%

4,40%

2,20%

2,60% 0,30%

1,40%

0,50% 1,10%

1,00% 1,40%

16,70%

2,00%1,10% 4,50% 2,90% 2,10%

34,20%

17,80%

3,30% 3,80%

0,10%

0,10%

1,40%

6,10%

Inertial development

Tourism and Recreation Center

CBD - Health Center

Agriculture

Food industry

Mechanical Engineering

Metallurgy

Light industry

Construction materials

Small Business

Pharmaceutics

Tourism

Science

Oil production and refining

Electric Power

Construction

Trade and marketing

Transport and communications

Utilities

Other sectors of economy

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Comparison of employment alternatives

70

283 707

348 158

356 863

1,10%

0,20%

0,00% 0,60%

38,30%

1,10% 6,70% 3,90% 1,50%

11,60%

2,30% 1,60% 2,00%

27,70%

0,90%

0,30% 0,30%

1,10%

0,70%

0,00%

0,50%

31,20%

14,00%

2,90%

13,50%

6,30%

1,50%

1,40% 0,20%

1,60%

1,30%

1,00% 0,30%

22,60%

30,40%

1,50%1,10%

15,50%

1,40% 1,00%

16,90%

3,90% 1,00% 1,60%

0,60%

0,80% 0,30%

1,70%

0,00% 1,80%

20,70%

Inertial development

Tourism and Recreation Center

CBD - Health Center

Agriculture

Food industry

Mechanical Engineering

Metallurgy

Light industry

Construction materials

Small Business

Pharmaceutics

Tourism

Science

Oil production and refining

Electric Power

Construction

Trade and marketing

Transport and communications

Utilities

Other sectors of economy

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Comparison of tax revenues by alternatives

71

17 407

38,80%

3,00%

9,80%

6,30% 3,30%

16,00%

3,60%

4,70% 5,60% 0,40%

2,60%

0,90%

1,40%

0,50%

1,30%

0,80% 1,20%

1,30%

0,80%

0,50%

51 247

13,20%

10,90%

3,50%

20,40%

32,60%

1,00%

3,20%

2,60%

0,40%

60 702

11,10%

1,10% 4,30%

11,10%

3,50% 2,30%

35,70%

1,40%

1,60%

0,90%

14,70%

2,90% 4,10%

2,30%

0,40%

1,90%

0,50%

4,90%

3,00% 0,30%

0,70% 0,70%

Inertial development

Tourism and Recreation Center

CBD - Health Center

Agriculture

Food industry

Mechanical Engineering

Metallurgy

Light industry

Construction materials

Small Business

Pharmaceutics

Tourism

Science

Oil production and refining

Electric Power

Construction

Trade and marketing

Transport and communications

Utilities

Other sectors of economy

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The alternative “CBD is the center of health and effective environmental management” provides higher employment of the population and the level of monetary incomes of the population.

Employment of the population, thousand people.

Dynamics of average per capita income of the population, thousand rubles per month

348

357

284

14

10

6

3,33,3

72

26,426,4

19,919,9

13,113,1

"Inertial Development"

"Recreation and Tourism Center"

"Center for Health and Environmental Management"

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

2004 2006 2008 2010 2015 2018 2020 2024 2028 2030

The main assumptions of calculations

Wage share in income by sector of the economy 55% (35% for

small business)

Wages are rising with productivity growth in

the relevant industry

Employment is calculated by dividing the turnover of the industry by

Productivity

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

In addition, the alternative "CBD - Center for Health and Environmental Management" is more attractive from the point of view of ensuring the budget system with taxes.

The volume of the regional budget, billion rub.

Budget security with regional taxes, %

8,68,6

68,768,7

35 %35 %

73

75 %75 %

64%64%

54 %54 %

0 2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2030

0 2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2030

"Inertial Development"

"Recreation and Tourism Center"

"Center of production of goods and services for health"

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

The main assumptions of the calculations > The regional budget of the CBD is growing due to the reduction of

per capita expenditure of the consolidated budget to 75% from the average Russian level

The forecast of each industry assumes the growth of the share of taxes in revenue to

Middle Russian

The forecast of each alternative assumes a decrease in the share of taxes coming to the regional budget due to an increase in the share of taxes coming to the federal budget

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Contents

74

1. The relevance of the development strategy of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

2. Prospective sectors of the economy

3. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy up to 2030

4. Prospects for the implementation of the Strategy

5. Annexes

1. Industry analysis: selection of priority industries

2. Strategic choice of alternatives for the development of the CBD economy

3. Current socio-economic situation of the CBD

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Social and economic problems of the CBD are typical for the regions of the SFD

75

CBD is characterized by a high subsidy budget with an average growth in the South Federal District tax

Revenue

The unemployment rate in the CBD is one of the highest in Russia (26%), and the share of unemployed in the

The CBD economy accounts for 69% of the working-age population.

The Republic is characterized by territorial distribution and significant differences

areas from each other

The productivity of the Kabardino-Balkaria industries is lower than in Russia and significantly lower,

than in industrialized countries.

Average salary and GRP per capita share in CBD is lower than in other regions

Russia

The sectoral structure of the economy is inefficient, it retains the priorities of the past and does not

competitive advantage of the region

In the main sectors of the economy, there is excessive wear and tear of equipment,

lack of qualified personnel, low-cost products with low added value and oriented to intraregional consumption

According to forecasts of Rosstat and estimates of the government of the CBD, in the republic there is a slow decline in the population and a decrease in the share of the population in working age

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

About the current situation. CBD is characterized by high budget subsidy with an average increase in tax revenues in the South Federal District

76

Structure of revenue part of budgets of subjects of the Russian Federation, 2005

100%

Tax revenues

73%

Non-tax revenues

Gratis income

Other

9%

16%

2%

28%

2%

65%

54%

5%

39%

2%

5%

Subjects of RF

Subjects of SFD

CBD 2005

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

About the current situation. Unemployment in the CBD is one of the highest in Russia

77

Unemployment rate, % (2004)

Average by Federal District

Southern FO

CENTRAL

4,6%

NORTH-WEST

6,0%

URAL

PRIVOLZHSKY

7,5%

7,8%

Rostov Rgn

Krasnodar region

Volgograd Rgn

Stavropol Krai

Astrakhan Rgn

North Ossetia - Alanya

Karachay-Cherkess Republic

Adygea Republic

8,6%

8,8%

9,4%

9,6%

11,0%

11,7%

16,9%

17,6%

LONG EAST

8,8%

Kalmykia Republic

21,7%

SIBERIAN

10,0%

SOUTH

15,4%

Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Dagestan Republic

Ingushetia Republic

Chechen Resp

25,7%

27,2%

46,3%

75,6%

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The share of unemployed in the CBD economy is 69% of the working-age population

78

Age structure of the population of CBD, %, thousand people

25 (4%)

35 (6%)

100% Unemployed

Structure of the population in working age, %

Employed

= 100% 562 thousand people

Discontinued students

40,8 (7%)

Unemployed

99 (18%)

Others not in employment

106,1 (19%)

Younger than able-bodied

Older than able-bodied

899

204 (23%)

140 (16%)

897

195 (22%)

140 (16%)

In the employable

556 (62%)

562 (63%)

Students in Universities

361,1 (56%)

Employed

2003

2004

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The proportion of unemployed and other unemployed is significantly lower in the cities of Nalchik and Prokhladny, compared with other regions of the Republic

79

Baksan +

Chegemsky

Zolsky

Urvansky +Lexensky

Prokhladnenskiy

Chereksky

Tersky

Maysky

Elbrussky

Nalchik

Unemployed relative to population, %, 2004

57%

52%

46%

53%

47%

40%

42%

45%

42%

43%

0% 10%

19%

5%

91%

2%

15%

17%

5%

91%

1%

17%

19%

7%

90%

0%

15%

18%

4%

90%

0%

15%

22%

4%

89%

0%

17%

22%

9%

87%

1%

17%

1%

12%

21%

24%

6%

87%

2%

85%

1%

14%

20%

5%

82%

3%

11%

18%

2%

77%

Mr. Cool

37%

1%

11%

23%

2%

75%

Other Unemployed

Percentage of retirees

Percentage of registered unemployed

Proportion of primary vocational education

Percentage of students in general education

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Among the unemployed, the share of those with higher or secondary vocational education is lower, which emphasizes the relevance of the development of the educational complex of the Republic.

80

Structure of employed and unemployed by level of education*

You're a man.

With higher professional education

With incomplete higher professional education

With average professional

35

10,1%

3,3%

9,4

With primary vocational education

11%

With secondary (general) education

57,5%

100%

176

27%

1%

24%

10%

33%

With basic general education

8,7%

Unemployed

4%

Employed

Source: Rosstat 2004

PRO-INVEST SPECIAL PROJECT

Development Strategy of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Project materials · Full published text

Development Project for Kabardino up to 2040

Source status: Project

Kabardino-Balkaria development project up to 2040 — project materials.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/proekt-razvitiya-do-2040-kabardino.html

Open on the site

Project

STRATEGY OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE CABARDINO-BALKAR REPUBLIC TO 2040

INTRODUCTION

The strategy of socio-economic development of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic up to 2040 (hereinafter referred to as the Strategy) is the fundamental document of the strategic planning system of the republic, the purpose of which is to identify and disclose the main problems, determine long-term goals, justify priority directions and scenarios for the development of the economy and social sphere of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic for the period up to 2040.

The Strategy takes into account the general trends in the development of the economy and civil society, the macroeconomic situation in Russia, as well as the conceptual foundations and directions of the policy of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation.

The document contains an analysis of the state and main directions of development of the economy and the social sphere of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, an analysis of key problems of socio-economic development, an assessment of the competitiveness and investment attractiveness of the republic, a scenario analysis and a forecast of macroeconomic indicators for two possible development options.

The strategy is formulated in accordance with the provisions of the article 32 the Federal Law 28 June 2014 N 172-FZ "On strategic planning in the Russian Federation", the Law of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic 28 December 2018 N 47Strategic Planning in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, taking into account the goals and objectives of the long-term development of the Russian Federation, the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and nearby regions, federal state programs and state programs of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, the Scheme of territorial planning of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.

Section I. ASSESSMENT OF THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE CABARDINO-BALKARIAN REPUBLIC

1.1. Analysis of socio-economic development of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

Socio-economic

The Kabardino-Balkarian Republic has been characterized by sufficient stability in recent years. Even in a crisis, the positive dynamics of its main

development

indicators.

The volume of gross regional product of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic has reached 2022 the Year 258,9 billion RUB, with the growth rate compared to the previous year in comparable prices 107%.

Industry

The industrial complex of the republic, the construction enterprises of engineering, is dynamically developing.

including materials, food, light, woodworking and other industries.

the University of London

Many enterprises are leading manufacturers of diamond tools, clothing, cable products of a wide range of applications, high-voltage switches, radio electronics devices, noise silencers to cars and trucks, complex medical equipment.

In the structure of manufacturing industries, the largest share is occupied by the sub-sectors "food production", "drink production", computers, electronic and optical products", "production of finished metal products".

“ Production

“ Production

clothes,

For 2019-2023 over the years, the volume of shipped goods of own production, performed works and services in current prices increased by 36,2% and in 2023 the Year of the Master 61,1 billion roubles.

The growth of the industrial production index for 5 years was 129,5%. Among the subjects that are part of the North Caucasus Federal District, the Kabardino-Balkar Republic in terms of shipped goods in 2019-2022 occupied 3th place (after the Stavropol Territory and the Republic of Dagestan).

The index of industrial production in 2020 and 2022 was higher than the average for the Russian Federation and the North Caucasus Federal District.

Utilities

Water supply and sanitation are an important branch of the territorial infrastructure and is designed to provide comfortable living conditions for the population for a long time, provided that it is constantly maintained in proper condition. This is the most complex production and technological complex of life support of the population, in which a quarter of the fixed assets are concentrated, including: water supply facilities - the total length of water supply networks is 4248,16 km, only 545 water intakes. Deterioration of water supply networks - 65,10 %, water intake facilities - 56,24%;

water disposal facilities – 9 Sewerage Treatment Facilities (USC 217,3 thousand.m3/day., 740,74 km of sewerage networks, 24 Pumping Stations.

Currently, the proportion of the population provided with quality water supply is 91,66%; 34 settlements are provided with self-flowing water supply to reduce energy consumption; 35 rural settlements receive water through water channels, this is an important part of water supply, aimed at covering the daily and economic needs of centralized water supply.

Human Settlements

Population;

Paragraphs

without

7

Great attention is paid to solving problems of uninterrupted

Providing the population of the republic with quality drinking water.

One of the solutions to the problems of improving water supply and providing the population with high-quality drinking water is participation in the programs implemented in the territory of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic in the field of water supply and sanitation.

During the period 2019-2023 in Kabardino-Balkarian

The Republic has implemented activities on:

construction and reconstruction of water supply facilities - built, reconstructed and replaced water supply networks with a length of 435,8 km, drilled 46 wells;

- built 42

Drainage

objects

Kilomile

Sewerage networks and 1 sewage treatment plant.

Agro-industrial complex

Agroindustrial

the economy of Kabardino-Balkaria, on the condition and development of which depends not only the food and financial security of the inhabitants of the republic, but also the socio-economic development of the territory as a whole.

The most important

complex

is

Agriculture

Agriculture makes the largest contribution (20,7%) to the gross regional product of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic. The industry is developing dynamically, which is ensured by a fuller use of competitive potential, intensification of high-tech investment projects, as well as state financial support for commodity producers.

Natural Resource Implementation

and production,

Benefits

V 2023 the Year of Creation 100 the Department of Agriculture 2,2 more than the average in the North Caucasus Federal District and 3,7 more than the average in the Russian Federation. According to the indicator of agricultural production per capita Kabardino - Balkar Republic 1- the place among the republics that are part of the North Caucasus Federal District, the index of agricultural production – 1- the place.

Over the past five years, the volume of agricultural production in a comparable estimate has increased by 49,9% and compiled the results 2023 years 96 billion roubles.

Agricultural production in 2019-2023

96037,1

84382,1

114,0

112,0

120000,0

100000,0

80000,0

60000,0

54933,6

59241,5

110,0

110,1

110,0

67970,8

40000,0

20000,0

0,0

104,9

2019 years

108,4

109,0

108,0

106,0

104,0

2021 years

2020 Gross agricultural output, million rubles Agricultural production index, %

2022 years

2023 years

The share of agricultural products in the total volume of agricultural products was 30,1%, increased almost to 6,4% Compared to 2019 Year. During this period, the share of agricultural production in the agricultural sector decreased 37,5% in 2019 the Year 26,1% in 2023 the Year.

Crop production is the leading branch of the agro-industrial complex of the republic. The share of crop production in the total volume of agricultural production in the year 2023 amounted to 59%.

Warm climate, fertile land allow to obtain good harvests of field crops, vegetables and fruits, to develop selection and seed production.

In the structure of the sown areas of the republic more than 75% are grain crops, the main one of them is corn (more than 70% crops). On the lands of the republic, winter wheat and spring wheat, barley, millet, oats, buckwheat, peas, etc. are cultivated. The growth of grain production over the past five years amounted to 125,12% and in 2023 reached 1421,1 thousand tons.

Kabardino-Balkarian

Traditionally, the Republic is a vegetable country. Tomatoes, cucumbers, greens, melon crops, onions, cabbage, carrots, sugar beet are grown in the republic. Vegetables are grown in protected and open ground. In the year 2023, almost 470,1 thousand tons of various vegetables were collected.

is

Production of vegetables in farms of all categories for the period 2019-2023 years increased by 16%. Including the production of greenhouse vegetables in 2023 the Year 39 thousand tons, which is 3,7 higher than the indicator 2019 years.

Kabardino-Balkaria is the leader in the production of fruit and vegetable canned food among the subjects of the North Caucasus Federal District. In 2023 year fruit and vegetable cans were produced - 314,6 million conditional cans.

The Republic has unique conditions for specialization in the field of horticulture. Kabardino-Balkaria occupies a leading position in the country in the construction of intensive-type gardens and the production of fruit and berry products.

Kabardino-Balkaria Republic is in the TOP-3 regions of Russia in terms of bookmarking of perennial plantings. From 2019 to 2023 year laid 8,2 thousand hectares of new gardens and nurseries. All gardens are of intensive and super-intensive type.

15 is valid for laying high-quality gardens in the republic

certified farms for growing planting material.

Annual production of seedlings is more than 2,5 million pieces, of which more than a million are sent outside the region. In 2023 year new nurseries laid on an area of about 150 hectares.

amounts to

To start 2024 years the area of perennial fruit and berry plantations ha. The area of intensive and thousands of super-intensive gardens - 23 thousand ha. Gross fruit and berry production charges for 2019-2023 Years have been increased in 2,2 once. V 2023 The gross collection of this product was 786 thousand tons (1- the place among the subjects of the Russian Federation).

26,4

In 2023 the area of actually irrigated lands amounted to 73,5

thousand, which is 171% to the level 2019 years.

Over the past five years, 658 units of various new agricultural machinery have been purchased. At the beginning of the year in the republic there are 5216 tractors, 569 combine harvesters, 45 feed harvesters. Available agricultural machinery allows you to carry out the entire range of field work at a high level and quickly.

For energy supply from 2019 to 2023 years Kabardino-Balkarian

The Republic holds 1 seats in the NCFD.

In the animal husbandry of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

41% gross agricultural output.

Priority areas of the industry are dairy, meat cattle, poultry, sheep, breeding livestock, fish farming.

As of 1 January 2024 breeding stock

is 27,7 thousand conventional heads (146,5% to 2019).

V 2023 In the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic meat (cattle and poultry) was produced) – 142,4 thousand tons (127% to the level 2019 Year of Milk – 601,3 thousand tons (116,9%), Eggs – 258,6 Millions of pieces (112,4%).

The most promising and rapidly developing livestock industry of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is poultry, which accounts for almost half (47%) of the meat produced. The number of birds in all categories of farms of the republic is more than 4,5 million heads. Poultry production is growing every year, including through the implementation of investment projects.

Further increase in meat production is planned

Birds.

The food and processing industry over the past years remains one of the main drivers of output growth in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic. On the industrial production of the territory of the republic carry out production activities 119 food and processing industry (including individual entrepreneurs, small and micro enterprises). The total number of employees in the food and processing industry in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is 4494 people.

Construction

For 2019-2023 Over the years, the total area of housing built in the republic, taking into account individual housing construction, increased by 28,4% and compiled in 2023 the Year 559,3 thousand sq. m.

Commissioning of residential buildings by organizations of all forms of ownership, thousand sq. m

559,3

514,4

522,6

500,4

474,1

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

580

560

540

520

500

480

460

440

420

Among the subjects that are part of the North Caucasus Federal District, in terms of the volume of housing introduced, the Kabardino-Balkar Republic in 2023 lost to the Chechen Republic, Stavropol Krai and the Republic of Dagestan.

4th place,

Shea

the Year

Construction of residential buildings in 2023, thousand sq. m

Stavropol Krai

Chechen Republic

1791,9

2331,5

Republic of North Ossetia-Alania

Karachay - Cherkess Republic

Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

481,5

419,9

559,3

Republic of Ingushetia

162,6

Republic of Dagestan

1617,4

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

In the total volume of housing introduced in the North Caucasus Federal District in 2023, the share of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is 7,6%.

The main volume of commissioned housing in the republic falls on individual developers, in 2023 - 57,4% of the total.

The volume of work performed by the type of activity "Construction", in current prices increased for 2019-2023 years more than in 2 Once in a while I made 2023 the Year 37,9 billion roubles.

In the total amount of work performed on the type of activity "Construction" in the North Caucasus Federal District in 2023, the share of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic accounts for 6,2%.

Transport and roads

electric, railway,

The main components of the transport system of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic are public transport (road, urban communication and public transport safety, road management. Analysis of the state of development, identification of needs and methods of determining ways to solve problems in each direction require a balanced improvement approach for the transport system of the republic.

Promising

by air,

Support

Development

and

Transportation of passengers is carried out by buses small, medium and

large capacity depending on the intensity of passenger traffic.

The municipal routes of Kabardino-Balkaria are represented by 85 routes, intermunicipal - 122 routes.

Republic

The infrastructure of railway transport in the republic consists of railways with length 133,3 km, access roads length 70 Kilomile, 10 stations, including 2 Train Station, 50 Platforms. 15 Rail

Rail

Moving,

Rail transport carries passengers in suburban traffic and long-distance trains.

The most important component of the transport system of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic are roads. From the level of transport and operational status and development of a network of public roads that provide communication between regions and settlements of the republic, the solution of problems of achieving sustainable economic growth, improving business conditions and improving the quality of life of the population largely depends. At present, the total length of the roads of the Republic passing (federal, regional and local significance) is 10588,5 km. Roads, depending on their value, are divided into:

Kabardino - Balkar

Territory

the City Council

Public roads of federal significance -

384,7 km;

public roads of regional importance -

2950,9 km;

public roads of local importance - 7252,9 km. Length

Use of regional significance in relation to the total length of roads in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is 27,87%.

Automotive

General

Roads

On the roads of federal and regional importance is currently operating 559 Bridges and overpasses, the total length of which is 16584,01 M, on the federal roads – 101 The bridge is long 5437 M on regional roads – 221 The bridge is long 7572,24 M, on the municipal roads – 237 Bridges Long 3574,8 pg. m.".

Fuel and energy complex

Fuel and energy complex

The Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is a set of interrelated sectors of the economy, including structures engaged in gas, heat, oil, electricity and consumption systems.

(more)

The power system of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic operates as part of the Unified Power System (UES) of the South in parallel with the UES of Russia, communication with which is organized along voltage transmission lines 330 KV and 110 kV through the electrical networks of adjacent regions. The energy system of the region is 5 Intersystem Connections 330 KW (3 - with the power system of the Stavropol Territory, 2 - with the power system of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania) and 7 Intersystem Connections 110 KW (4 - with the power system of the Stavropol Territory and 3 - with the power system of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania). The level of provision of settlements of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic with electric energy is 100%.

Control room

Operation Management

Power Systems

Management

The Republic,

Kabardino-Balkarian operation of existing hydroelectric power plants, system-forming lines 330 kV and power lines from power stations voltage 110 kV is carried out by the dispatch center of the branch of the joint-stock company "System Operator of the Unified Energy System" "Regional dispatch management of power systems of the republics of the North Caucasus and Stavropol Territory".

Modes

The electricity supplier in the country is

Joint Stock Company PJSC "Rosseti North Caucasus".

(installed

Electricity production is provided by the Baksansky Zaragizhskaya hydroelectric power plants (installed capacity 27 MW), Auschiger (installed capacity - 60 MW), Kashkhatau (installed capacity - 65,1 a) the power of the Muharram 0,9 MW), Akbashskaya (installed capacity - 1 MW), MHPP N 3 (Installed capacity - 3,5 MW), Verkhnebalkarskaya (installed capacity - 10 MW) and two thermal power plants.

30,6 MW),

Power

Currently, 2 investment projects are being implemented in the territory of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic for the construction of 2 small hydroelectric power plants (MHPPs): Cherekskaya MHPP and Verkhnebaksanskaya MHPP.

The most important indicators affecting the functioning of the power system are the balance of electric energy (power), which in the republic depends on the purchased energy in the wholesale market, and the structure of electricity consumption. In total, the amount of electricity generated by power plants located in the republic is more than 32%.

Consumable

Share

An average of more than 1.5 billion kWh of electricity is sold in the republic each year. To meet consumers’ electricity demand in full, generating capacity of up to 250 MW is needed to cover the base load, and up to 100 MW to cover the winter peak load, including the necessary reliability reserve. The substantial hydro resources, climatic conditions, construction- enabling installation work, location in the area of the republic’s road and electricity networks provide extensive opportunities to stimulate investment in the energy sector. is produced

Construction sites

Year-round

Implementing

Thermal

Large

Maintenance

energy

Small

the City

and

(decentralized) CHP and boiler systems

Gas Distribution

a property complex consisting of gas pipelines 8036,9 km, of which 2 729,4 km is above ground and 5307,5 Kilometres underground. The CBD is located 41 Gas Distribution Station.

Presents

CBD

Gas supply

consumers of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is carried out by Gazprom Mezhregiongaz Nalchik. Operation

gas distribution networks and facilities on the networks are carried out by Gazprom Nalchik. Both companies are part of the Gazprom Mezhregiongaz Group. The annual volume of natural gas supplies to the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic exceeds cubic meters. The priority area for Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is reconstruction and technical re-equipment of the existing gas infrastructure. The development will contribute to the growth of economic potential, as well as the investment attractiveness of the republic.

Gas Supply

1,4 billion

System

In the republic, a program of social gasification in gasified settlements (dogasification) is being implemented, under which points without attracting funds from the population are connected to the boundaries of land plots of non-gasified households owned by individuals on the right of ownership or on another right provided for by law, according to the submitted application.

Budget

V

Sphere

Economics

Budget

The positive dynamics of tax revenues to the budget system of the Russian Federation remains. Budgets at all levels in 2023 Taxes and other mandatory payments in the amount of 23482,6 Millions of rubles, which 9,8% higher than 2022 years. For 5 Tax payments to the budget system of the Russian Federation have increased over the years 1,6 times.

Republic

For 2019 - 2023 the Consolidated Budget of Kabardino - Balkarian Republic 1,9 Time and made 69991,0 million rubles. Tax and non-tax revenues of the consolidated budget of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic in the amount of 24804,0 Millions of rubles for 5 Years have increased in 1,5 once. Expenditure

The budget of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic for the analyzed period increased by 2,1 times and in 2023 amounted to 70096,2 million rubles.

Consolidated

As a result of the measures taken by the Government of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, it was possible to significantly reduce the size of the state debt of the republic, as well as the cost of its maintenance. For 5 The amount of CBD’s public debt has decreased over the years 25,0% and as of 1 January 2024 The amount of the state debt of the republic 7739,8 million rubles.

The implementation of the main directions of the debt policy will be sustainable

to contribute to the budget system of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.

further

Debt

Tourism

Has

High

Kabardino-Balkaria

Recreational Specialization Areas are

tourist and recreational potential, which is due to a unique combination of natural conditions. The main recreation complex "Prielbrusye" and sanatorium complex "Nalchik". Currently, the list of objects of the resort-recreational and tourist complex of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic has 390 collective accommodation facilities, which are simultaneously ready to accommodate 18190 tourists and vacationers.

Tourist flow, thousands of people

1533

1213

1086

602

540

1800

1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

2019 years

2020 years

2021 years

2022 years

2023 years

Tourist flow for 5 years increased by 2,8 times and amounted to 2023 years

1533 thousand people.

status

National

In recent years, a number of measures have been implemented to update existing and develop new tourist routes. In 2022 the tourist route "Three Gorges of Kabardino-Balkaria and the majestic Elbrus" received a tourist route. In addition to popularizing the region, the presence of an approved national tourist route allows the republic to participate in a grant program in the direction of arranging the national tourist route. It should also be noted the work carried out by JSC "KAVKAZ.RF" in the framework of the interregional tourist route "National Caucasian Trail" - in general, it is planned to equip about 500 km throughout the republic.

Within the framework of the project to create a tourist cluster in the North Caucasus Federal District under the management of KAVKAZ.RF JSC, work is actively underway in the republic to develop the Prielbrusya zone, which involves the modernization of the resort and bringing the ski infrastructure in line with international standards. In the course of implementation, it is planned to expand the ski areas by building new ski slopes and cable cars. The construction of an artificial snowmaking system is also being carried out and the arrangement of

tourist routes.

In order to create a favorable image of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic annually takes part in international, all-Russian and interregional events in the field of tourism.

Social sphere

Education

According to Rosstat 1 February 2024 People in the Republic 87052 Children under the age 6 years, from 7 to 17 years – 102248 children who receive general, additional and secondary vocational education in 387 State and municipal educational organizations.

The education system of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is currently functioning 266 Organizations that offer pre-school education programs 47875 Pupils.

C 2016 the Republic of Moldova 100- percentage availability

Preschool education from 2 months to 7 years.

According to the educational programs of primary general, basic general, secondary general education, 121603 people study, educational 266 general educational organizations. 17918 people work in general education organizations, including 10713 teachers and 7126 teachers.

Execute

Activities

Also

Additional education of children provided 24 institutions, including 21 Municipal and 3 State. They work around 50 Thousands of children. Educational activities are carried out 769 employees, including 557 Pedagogical workers.

Condition

Inherent

socio-economic

The development of the republic is an effectively built system of professional education and science. This activity is being implemented 6 Scientific Institutions, 3 Federal Universities and 18 Secondary Vocational Education Institutions, 6 of which are subdivisions of higher education organizations, 9 – the Ministry of Education of the CBD 3 – Private.

Health care

Currently in the system structure

the Kabardino - Balkarian Republic 45 medical organizations, including 11 Hospitals, 1 the District Hospital, 1 the District Hospital, 4 Dispensary, 11 Polyclinics, 17 Specialized Centers.

Health organizations of the republic work 3444 Doctor and 7999 Personnel in nursing positions. They operate in the Republic 31 Medical and Obstetrics Department, 11

the Health Care Centers, 93 Medical Outpatients and 1 medical center, which are structural units of central district hospitals and provide primary health care to the population.

The population of the Republic of Korea has reached the 2023 the Year 72 Beds on 10 Thousands of people. The availability of doctors is 46 on 10 thousands of people, the provision of secondary medical personnel 10 Thousands of people – 97.

In recent years, the material and technical equipment of medical organizations has significantly improved, which made it possible to introduce high-tech methods of treatment and diagnosis, the receipt of which was previously possible only outside the republic.

hospitals,

Republican

On the basis of the Republican Clinical Hospital, the Interdistrict Clinical Multidisciplinary Center for High Medical Technologies, the City Clinical Hospital No 2, Perinatal Center, Republican Children's Clinical Multidisciplinary Center, Center for Combating AIDS and Infectious Diseases, Oncology Dispensary, Center for Allergology and Immunology, Republican Clinical Medical and Surgical High-tech Medical Care by Profiles: Neurosurgery, Cardiovascular Surgery, Ophthalmology, Traumatology-Orthopedics, Maxillofacial Surgery, Abdo-Personal Surgery.

It turns out

Center

In order to provide high-quality and timely medical care, the fleet of sanitary vehicles has been updated, including purchased reanimation vehicles equipped with artificial ventilation devices, cardio monitors, defibrillators.

Measures aimed at improving the organization of medical care and increasing its accessibility, prevention of cardiovascular diseases, promotion of a healthy lifestyle contributed to a decrease in mortality in 2023 to 7,5 per 1000 inhabitants, which is one of the lowest rates in the country (on average in the Russian Federation - 12,1).

The provision of medical care in the field of motherhood and childhood is provided by a preventive modern perinatal center. Infant mortality rate in the Republic 2023 the Year of the Master 3,6 in the calculation of 1000 Born (in 2018 the Year – 4,8).

Multidisciplinary

The institutions,

developed

which

Network

Numbers

The implementation of demographic policy measures allowed to increase life expectancy in the republic from 76,08 in 2018 to 77,14 in 2023.

Physical Culture and Sports

In the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, much attention is paid to the development of physical culture and sports, the formation of a healthy image of a strong life of the population, the younger generation, as well as a worthy performance of athletes at the largest all-Russian and international sports competitions, which is one of the components of the socio-economic development of Kabardino-Balkaria.

Physical education

Harmonious

In accordance with the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation "On National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030" in the established targets characterizing the achievement of national goals, the proportion of citizens involved in systematic physical culture and sports should be at least 70,0% by 2030.

A special role in the development of physical culture and sports at the place of residence is played by 13 units in the field of physical culture and sports of municipalities, which are part of the physical culture movement, and they are the ones who carry out the amount of practical work on the development of physical culture and mass sports at the place of residence and study.

are the main

52

In the system of development of physical culture and sports function 47 sports schools, sports training center of national teams of Kabardino-Balkaria Republic, professional football club "Spartak-Nalchik", sports federations, Olympic Council and various sports clubs. In the sports sector, from which 13 State and 36 Municipal, 39 Sport Sports 27693 Man, of them 25643 – Children and youth before 18 years. 14 sports organizations train high-class athletes and have the status of Olympic reserve schools.

Accredited

Regional

Today, 678 full-time students work in sports schools of the republic.

Teachers and 219 combine work activities.

Integrated work has resulted in 2023 in the year to increase the proportion of persons systematically engaged in physical culture and sports in the total population of the Republic of 3-79 years before 56,2%.

For the quality preparation of the sports reserve of the national teams of Russia, 11 basic sports were approved, which included: boxing, skiing, judo, athletics, karate, modern pentathlon, sports wrestling, weightlifting, hand-to-hand and universal combat, taekwondo.

According to the Unified Calendar Plans of the Ministry of Sport of the Russian Federation and the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, more than 300 events are held annually, of which about 80-90 are interregional, all-Russian and international levels.

The Republic,

In order to stimulate and financially support coaches and athletes who have achieved international and all-Russian sporting events, there are decrees of the Head of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic to pay monetary rewards to athletes of the republic - members of the national teams of the Russian Federation and teachers.

Results

High

In the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, targeted work is being carried out to attract people with disabilities to regular physical education and sports, to create the necessary conditions for reunification with society, participation in socially useful work and rehabilitation of their health.

More than 30 sports events are held annually for people with disabilities. Athletes of this category take part in republican and all-Russian competitions, where they become winners and prize-winners.

Priority

sports infrastructure through the construction and commissioning of sports facilities within walking distance for people to engage in physical culture and sports.

Direction

development

is

C 2018 the Year of Construction 68 objects, of which 10 Sports Complex and 58 Construction of flats, including: 34 Multifunctional Sports Grounds, 12 GTO sites, 4 Standard Football Fields with Artificial Coating, 3 the Open Type Sports and Health Complex, 4 "Smart" sports fields, 1 mini-field with artificial coating.

The level of providing citizens with sports facilities based on one-time capacity" is 58,0%, which corresponds to the target values of the state program "Development of physical culture and sports in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic".

Interethnic relations

Kabardino-Balkarian Multiconfessional Republic.

Republic

–

Multinational

and

The system of educational and cultural institutions operating in Kabardino-Balkaria generally meets the ethnocultural and religious needs of the peoples living in the republic.

The main ethnic diasporas and communities have created public organizations, the main purpose of which is to fully express the needs and requests of the peoples they represent in preserving ethnic groups in the socio-cultural space of the republic. There are about 40 national public associations in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, including 14 national cultural centers.

Registered in the Republic 193 religious organizations, including 138 Muslim, 23 Orthodox, 1 Judaic, 1 Armenian, 3

Roman Catholic and 27 Protestants. The Republic operates 150 Mosques, 20 Orthodox Churches, 1 Monastery, 4 the Temple Chapel, 1 synagogue, 25 Protestant and 3 Roman Catholic Prayer Houses.

The state authorities of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and local self-government bodies, observing the principle of non-interference, maintain constructive relations with national cultural centers, national and religious associations, Cossack societies, cooperate with them in the observance of legislation on freedom of speech, freedom of religion, ensuring interethnic, interreligious and intrareligious harmony, religious and humanitarian education, the use of their capabilities in spiritual and moral education. They provide financial, material and other assistance in the construction and restoration of religious buildings and objects that are monuments of history and culture, providing tax and other benefits. This has a positive impact on the improvement and stabilization of the socio-political situation in the republic.

An important factor in stabilizing the socio-political situation in the republic is the support and interaction with compatriots living abroad.

Efforts are aimed at implementing cultural and humanitarian projects, objective coverage of the history of the Russian state, the study of native and Russian languages, improving the mechanisms for returning compatriots living abroad to their historical homeland, and forming a positive image of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and the Russian Federation as a whole by representatives of the Adyghe and Balkarian diasporas abroad.

The activities of public organizations of compatriots abroad and in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are focused on the revival and development of cultural and spiritual heritage, the preservation of its national identity, the strengthening of peace, friendship and harmony between peoples.

More than 60 public associations of compatriots are actively working in the Russian Federation and abroad, in particular: "International Circassian Association" includes 15 organizations, of which 6 operate abroad (Turkey, Jordan, Germany, Israel, Syria, Abkhazia), 9 in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (CBD, KCR, RA, Krasnodar Territory, Stavropol).

Also,

abroad there are 17 Karachay-Balkarian public organizations, of which: in the Republic of Turkey - 13, the Republic of Kazakhstan - 3, the Kyrgyz Republic - 1

Standard of living

In recent years, as a result of the growth of production in real terms

The economic sector and the implementation of national projects and government programmes aimed at improving the quality and living standards of the population have significantly reduced the number of people living abroad in poverty.

Thus, the population with monetary incomes below the subsistence minimum for 5 years decreased by 1,7 times and amounted to 2023 127,9 thousand people, or 14,2% of the total population.

Average monthly nominal wage, rubles

39987,6

35250,8

29899,0

31711,8

45000,0

40000,0

35000,0

30000,0

27466,4

25000,0

20000,0

15000,0

10000,0

5000,0

0,0

2019 years

2020 years

2021 years

2022 years

2023 years

During this period, more than 1,5 The average monthly nominal wage (in 25776 Rubles in 2018 the Year 39988 Rubles in 2023 year). With consumer prices rising, real wages have increased 10,6%. The average Republican salary in 2023 The year provided 2,4 The subsistence minimum of the working population.

Small Business

In the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, small business is one of the

important areas of socio-economic development.

As of 10 January 2024 The number of small and medium-sized businesses was 21290 units (growth rate since the beginning of the current year – 109,9 %), including 5586 legal entities (growth rate since the beginning of the current year – 106,6 %), 15704 Individual entrepreneurs (growth rate since the beginning of the current year – 111,1 %).

By results 2023 The number of employees in the sphere of SMEs, including individual entrepreneurs operating in the territory of the republic, was 118,2 Thousands of people.

The number of self-employed citizens who have fixed their status and apply a special tax regime "Tax on professional - 71261 people, of which 69344 individuals and 1917 income" of individual entrepreneurs.

The number of newly created SMEs was 4767 units, including newly created legal entities - 613 units, newly created individual entrepreneurs - 4154 units.

In Kabardino-Balkaria, a service model for supporting small and medium-sized businesses is being implemented, involving the use of the entire arsenal of support measures at all stages of the life cycle of enterprises from registration to expansion and going beyond small forms through the development of infrastructure to support small and medium-sized businesses.

SME support infrastructure is a network of organizations that provide property, information, consulting and financial support to businesses.

For

2019–2023

Small businesses under special tax regimes amounted to 6461 million rubles.

income

Subjects

years

from

Tax revenues from small and medium-sized entities

Entrepreneurship, million rubles

1803,9

1671,2

1003,9

974,2

1007,8

2000

1800

1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

As part of financial support to small and medium-sized businesses, guarantees are provided at the expense of the NGO "Guarantee Fund of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic" to attract

bank credit (hereinafter referred to as the Guarantee Fund).

the Guarantee Fund

397 sureties in the amount of 1656,7 million rubles were provided. The amount of loan agreements concluded under the guarantee of the Guarantee Fund amounted to 5452,6 million rubles.

period

the National Park

Amount of guarantees provided by the Guarantee Fund to small and medium-sized businesses

1170,4

1259,3

1047,1

1192,7

783,11

592,0

197,1

77

237,3

109

279,3

39

350,98

74

98

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Number of guarantees

Amount of loan agreements

Amount of loan agreements

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

For development and improvement

In the year 2016, a regional microfinance organization was established in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic - a non-profit microcredit company "Fund of Medium-Sized Enterprises of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic" (hereinafter - the Microcredit Fund).

Microcredit

Subjects

Small

and

Microcredit Fund for the specified period issued to small and medium-sized businesses 803 loans totaling 633,3 million rubles.

The amount of support provided by the Microcredit Fund to small and medium-sized businesses

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

348,8

177

166

169

77

79,2

69,4

79,7

214

28,1

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

number of microloans

amount, million rubles

Property support includes the provision of rental on preferential terms of state and municipal property through a network of business incubators located in the territory of the republic, also formed, lists of state and municipal property intended for the possession and (or) use of small businesses on a long-term basis.

Complementary

approved

Constantly

and

the University of London

the University of London

On

Territory

Republic

I am functioning

There are 6 business incubators providing property support, where 79 entrepreneurs are located, which created 377 jobs. Also

In the framework of property support, lists of state and municipal property designed to provide ownership and (or) use to small and medium-sized businesses on a long-term basis have been formed and approved. As of 1 January 2024 the List of State Property 21 the object, in the list of municipal property - 183 Object.

the University of London

Information, consulting and methodological support is provided by almost all organizations of infrastructure support of small and medium-sized businesses, which for the convenience of entrepreneurs operate on a single platform - the Center for the provision of services "My Business".

Centre

Entrepreneurship of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, providing a complex of information, consulting and educational services, includes:

Support

Engineering Engineering

technological entrepreneurship;

center, readiness

providing subjects

Small

Services

Increase in average

and

SME Export-Oriented Entity Support Coordination Centre to facilitate export-oriented SME

to Russian and international markets; social innovations

Center

the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, whose main goal is the development of an innovative, small-scale system of entrepreneurial education.

Entrepreneurship,

Social

Middle

and

Agricultural

The center is also endowed with the functions of a regional center of competence in the field of implementation of cooperation in the development of organizational agricultural cooperatives and small forms of management in the republic.

in directed

support,

Objectives

measures

the City

Investment climate

The development of the economy of Kabardino-Balkaria in the medium term will depend entirely on the actions of state authorities and business in terms of attracting investment, improving the investment climate.

In the republic there is a positive dynamics of growth of investments in fixed assets. For the last 5 This number has increased over the years with 42,3 to 64,9 billion roubles.

Investment risks

- this is a key factor inhibiting the attraction of investments to the republic. A situation in which credit institutions refuse to finance the implementation of investment projects in the territory of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic or offer financial resources on conditions that make the implementation of the project unattractive cannot stimulate the activity of potential investors.

Measures are being taken to solve the strategic problem of increasing the investment attractiveness of the territory and attracting improvement of investments, investment legislation and creating favorable conditions for attracting investors.

the Department

attention

Special

In accordance with the Law of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic of 16 April 2001 No. 23-RZ "On Investment Activities in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic", the following measures of state support may be applied to entities carrying out the republic:

Activities

Territory

the City

the Kabardino - Balkarian State Guarantees

Republic;

providing a benefit on the property tax of organizations; reducing the rate of corporate income tax; providing security in the form of collateral for the objects of the pledge fund

Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

Providing investment tax credits for regional

taxes;

provision of subsidies from the republican budget of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic for reimbursement of part of the costs of interest payments on loans received by the subjects of investment activity in credit institutions;

provision of subsidies from the republican budget of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic for reimbursement of part of the costs for payment of leasing payments under financial lease (leasing) agreements concluded by the subjects of investment activity;

Subsidies from the Republican Budget

Balkar Republic in the implementation of investment projects;

reduction of corporate income tax rate for some

categories of taxpayers in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

Land for rent without bidding in

in accordance with the orders of the Head of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.

In addition to the investment legislation,

The measures of support provided for at the federal level are in force.

Thus, in order to protect investors and promote investment 01.04.2020 Law No 69-FZ “On protection and promotion adopted Federal (SZPK). SZPK is an investment agreement in the Russian Federation between the Russian Federation and/or its subjects and the organization implementing the investment project. This agreement provides a number of benefits for organizations implementing investment projects.

This law was adopted at the republican level.

Relevant regulatory legal acts:

the Government of the CBD 31.08.2020 № 199-PP "On the determination of the Ministry of Economic Development of the CBD by the executive body of state power of the CBD authorized to sign agreements on protection and promotion of investments from the CBD";

(b) reconstruction that provides and

the Government of the CBD 24.05.2021 № 112-PP "On reimbursement of Kabardino-approval of the Rules for determining the volume of Balkar Republic costs for the creation (construction), modernization of related and infrastructures necessary for the implementation of an investment project, in respect of which an agreement on the protection and promotion of investment, as well as the cost of interest on loans and loans, coupon payments on bonded loans attracted for these purposes, and the provision of subsidies for these purposes in accordance with the budget legislation of the Russian Federation";

(or)

the Government of the CBD 11.12.2021 № 249-PP "On approval of the list of laws and other regulatory legal acts of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, applied taking into account the features established by article 9 Federal Law.

the RF Government Decree 19.10.2020 № 1704 About approval of Rules of determination of new investment projects, in order to

implementation of which the funds of the budget of the subject of the Russian Federation released as a result of reducing the amount of repayment of debt of the subject of the Russian Federation to the Russian Federation on budget loans are subject to the direction of implementation by the subject of the Russian Federation of budget investments in infrastructure objects.

In order to implement this resolution, the CBD adopted: the Decree of the Government of the CBD of 22.10.2021 No. 461-rp on the definition of the executive body of state power of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, authorized to sign agreements on behalf of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic on the implementation of new investment projects included in the consolidated list of new investment projects;

the Government of the CBD 30.12.2021 № 291-PP "On approval of the Procedure for the formation of the list of new investment projects for inclusion in the consolidated list of new investment projects";

the Government of the CBD 30.12.2021 № 292-PP "On approval of the procedure for granting subsidies from the republican budget of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic to legal entities for reimbursement of costs for the creation of infrastructure facilities necessary for the implementation of new investment projects".

During the reporting period, more than 20 large investment projects were implemented in the republic, including under the state program "Development of the North Caucasus Federal District" with the involvement of co-financing from the federal budget, among which the following should be noted:

the Russian Federation

The first production stage of the project of Chegem Agro LLC "Construction of a greenhouse complex for the production of fruit and vegetable products of protected soil with a total area of 100 hectares, located at the address: Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, Chegemsky district, 2,5 km. east of the city. Chegem” for 8 300 million rubles, 592 new jobs were created;

"Creation of breeding and seed breeding center" LLC "Selection", the total investment - 569,60 million rubles, the number of jobs created - 73;

"Construction of Verkhnebalkarskaya Hydroelectric Power Plant with capacity adjustment from 29,6 MW to 10 MW", the total investment amount is 3 706,10 million rubles. As part of the project, 25 new jobs were created.

"The laying of a super-intensive garden on an area of 200 hectares in the Chegem municipal district" the total investment amounted to 440,4 million rubles, 25 new jobs were created;

"The laying of an intensive garden on an area of 73 hectares", LLC "Nalchik Gardens" the total investment - 325 million rubles, created 22 new jobs;

"Construction of a fruit processing plant with a capacity of 240 tons

per day (finished-product capacity: 70-80 tonnes of sterile apple purée for baby food and the confectionery industry) in Nalchik”; total investment: 250 million roubles; 40 new jobs created. “Creation of the UPPER BLUE LAKES tourist complex” by VERKHNIE GOLUBYE OZYORA LLC: total investment amounted to 240.0 million roubles.

"The laying of the apple orchard and the construction of a fruit storage facility in the Chegem municipal district" LLC "KABARDINE APPLES" the total investment - 580 Millions of rubles, created 20 new jobs; "Construction of modern fruit storage facilities 3,4 thousand tons and laying an intensive apple orchard on the square 33 Alfa Plus LLC Total Investment - 202,1 Millions of rubles, created 22 new jobs;

"Construction of fruit storage for 7 thousand tons with a sorting site in the city. AGROHOLOD LLC, total investment - 670,03 million rubles, created 22 new jobs;

"Construction of the fruit storage facility for 9 thousand tons per year. Nalchike, Elbrus Gardens LLC total investment - 630 million rubles, 50 new jobs created;

"Modernization of the plant for the production of plastic containers (SE SKFO)" LLC TD "Stroy-Mash" the total investment - 600 million rubles, created 29 new jobs;

"Construction of a cattle slaughter enterprise in the Baksan municipal district with a capacity of 5 thousand tons per year" MitPlant LLC total investment - 350 million rubles, 25 new jobs were created;

"Construction of trout in the city. Chegeme of Chegemsky district" LLC "Kavkaz Ryba" total investment - 170 million rubles, 25 new jobs were created;

Resumption of the glass container production plant of Chegem Glass Plant LLC total investment - 150 million rubles, 270 new jobs were created;

Expansion of production capacities of VoentikstilProm LLC

(in English) Baksane) created 240 new jobs;

In addition, for the specified period, 25 fruit storage facilities with a total capacity of over 102 thousand tons per year were put into operation. Nalchik, Baksan, Urvan and Chegem municipal districts with a total investment of 6 352 million rubles, created more than 293 new jobs.

In pursuance of the order of the President of the Russian Federation 8 July 2014 No Pr-1603 Kabardino-Balkarian Republic annually participates in the National rating of the investment climate in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, which is carried out by the autonomous non-profit organization "Agency for Strategic Initiatives to Promote New Projects" in order to assess the effectiveness of activities

executive bodies to improve the investment climate in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, as well as the introduction of best practices aimed at improving the investment climate in the regions.

According to the results of the National rating 2023 Mr. The Kabardino-Balkarian Republic improved the position of the previous year, taking 19 Place from 38. The integrated index of the investment climate of the CBD increased by 7,43 points (average increase in Russia – 6,45 a) and has made 261,77 a Point ( in 2023 the Year 254,34 Score).

At the same time, the level of investment activity in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic does not correspond to the level of its potential investment attractiveness. As part of the implementation of the Strategy, work will be carried out to increase investment potential and reduce investment risk, as well as increase the rank of the investment climate in the rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

1.2. Analysis of key problems of socio-economic development of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The factors,

Deterrence

development

Activities

the University of London

Sphere

Industry:

Insufficient funding for measures

State support;

High interest rates on bank loans; shortage of qualified personnel. In order to advance the development of the industry of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, it is necessary to consider the possibility of easing the conditions for enterprises of the industrial complex of the republic when receiving financial measures of state support within the framework of the measures of the state program of the Russian Federation "Development of industry and increase its competitiveness", approved by the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation 15 April 2014 N 328, As a priority area.

Non-subsidized regions receive co-financing from the federal budget in the amount of 30% for the implementation of regional programs. It is necessary to revise this approach and increase support for the industry of high-granting regions (which include all republics that are part of the North Caucasus Federal District) from 5% to 50% and above, since regional budgets at their own expense allocate funds necessary for the development of non-industry expenditures.

Status

the University of London

It is necessary to resolve issues related to the provision of short-term loans at the expense of the federal budget at a preferential percentage to subjects of activity in the industry to replenish working capital, attracting industrial enterprises of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic to perform the state defense

assistance in placing state orders for high-tech civilian and dual-use products within the framework of the diversification program.

The main problem for the republic remains the issue of uninterrupted water supply to the population, as well as the organization of water disposal. These problems predominate in rural areas of the republic.

In many localities of the republic, especially in the rural network, in unsatisfactory

areas, the water supply condition is worn out water disposal networks.

Existing water networks, including those in rural areas, have been built in 1940 - 1960years and are in a state of wear, which entails losses in water supply networks 20 - 40%. The current situation requires a comprehensive solution.

Currently, fresh groundwater plays a significant role in the economic and drinking water supply of the population and as a source of water supply, has a number of advantages over surface water. First of all, they have better quality, are more reliably protected from pollution and contamination, are less susceptible to seasonal and long-term fluctuations and in most cases their use does not require expensive water treatment measures. However, the use of groundwater is inextricably linked to the environment, any changes, for example, the amount of precipitation, inevitably cause changes in the regime, resources and quality of groundwater.

In connection with the change of climatic conditions and experience of recent years in drilling geological exploration and updating the database on approved groundwater reserves of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.

Necessity

exists

Wells,

the University of London

Many rural areas lack a centralized water disposal system. Due to the lack of sewerage networks in settlements, treatment facilities are loaded from 20 to 60%, a significant part of the wastewater accumulates in sumps, cesspools, filtration fields, which worsens the environmental situation. In order to eliminate non-standard wastewater treatment at the facilities, it is necessary to build new and reconstruct sewerage facilities, replace outdated and failed technological and pumping equipment, replace emergency networks and collectors.

existing

In addition, problems in the utilities sector remain: a high volume of unaccounted water consumption due to the low level of equipping consumers with metering devices, the relevance of the subscriber base and unauthorized water intake for household needs (watering gardens, greenhouses, car washes, etc.);

lack of centralized water supply and sanitation

human settlements; lack of

Investment

programs

UW

Resource Providers

organizations;

negative impact on the environment. Non-subsidized regions receive co-financing from the federal budget in the amount of 30% for the implementation of regional programs. It is necessary to revise this approach and increase support for the industry of high-granting regions (which include all the republics that are part of the North Caucasus Federal District) from 5% to 50% and above, since regional budgets do not allocate funds necessary for the development of industry at their own expense.

Status

the University of London

It is necessary to resolve issues related to the provision of short-term loans at the expense of the federal budget at a preferential percentage to industrial entities to replenish working capital, attracting industrial enterprises of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic to fulfill the state defense order, assisting in placing state orders for high-tech civilian and dual-use products within the framework of the diversification program.

In the agro-industrial complex, the main problems are related to

The following factors:

Yield

development. Accepted

technological and technical level lag

Due to the insufficient agricultural producers for modernization and transition to innovative implementation of state programs, the measures allowed to overcome the long-term reduction in the number of machines and equipment in agriculture, but the available agricultural machinery is not enough to carry out the entire volume of agricultural work and ensure their quality. The supply of agricultural producers with tractors is 79,1%, grain harvesters - 44,8%, ploughs - 105,4%, grain seeders - 70,9% from the requirements;

within

the University of London

situation

Financial

Unstable

enterprises: most producers do not have their own working capital, the level of income of agricultural producers does not allow them to conduct production on an expanded basis, to maintain and update timely material payments with suppliers and contractors;

social infrastructure,

Base and

Many

Products

Price Increases

Energy resources, increasing price disparity in support of the agricultural state (several times lower than developed countries in Europe and the United States), resulting in unprofitable production. Unfavorable ratio of prices for agricultural products and services make it difficult to carry out field work in a timely manner and adversely affect the overall result of production;

Small Size

Insufficient

relationship,

Land

the University of London

land use, constant redistribution and fragmentation of land and the associated destruction of the system that has developed over many years - the foundations of agriculture and agriculture, and in particular crop rotation of field productivity, reducing the efficiency of the use of land reclamation, agrochemistry and large-sized equipment;

Exclusion of agricultural land from agricultural circulation and the problem of maintaining (reproducing) soil fertility. The removal of nutrients from the soil exceeds their intake with mineral and organic fertilizers, which leads to soil depletion. The loss of soil fertility has resulted in partial soil degradation. The use of organic and mineral fertilizers has decreased. There is a shortage of mineral fertilizers in agriculture. The proportion of areas with introduced mineral fertilizers in the entire sown area in agricultural organizations of the republic is not more than 70%;

Limited access of agricultural producers to the market in the conditions of imperfection of its infrastructure, weak development of cooperation in the production and sale of agricultural products, remains low level of development of intra- and intersectoral cooperation of enterprises. During two decades of agrarian reforms, it was not possible to create a satisfactory system for selling agricultural products, to create conditions for effective trade in agricultural products, raw materials and food in the food market of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

Employment

Rural residents

The slow pace of social development of rural areas, the reduction of alternative activities, low public assessment of agricultural labor, insufficient resource provision at all levels of financing, the lack of qualified personnel in agricultural enterprises, the strengthening of the outflow of qualified personnel from the agricultural sector, the aging of workers.

Weak

the University of London

There are a number of problems with water supply and sanitation. The problem for the Republic remains

The issue of uninterrupted supply of water to the population, as well as the organization of water disposal. These problems predominate in rural areas of the republic.

In many localities of the republic, especially in the rural network, in unsatisfactory

areas, the water supply condition is worn out water disposal networks.

Existing water networks, including those in rural areas, have been built in 1940 - 1960years and are in a state of wear, which entails losses in water supply networks 20 - 40%. The current situation requires a comprehensive solution. Rural communities lack their own revenues to replace water networks at the expense of local budgets. Because

At present, the republic has not yet reached a self-sufficient level of development, and federal state bodies need assistance to resolve this issue.

To solve these problems, it is necessary to implement a set of measures, including the completion of the construction of the Zolya Group Water Supply (Stage II), the construction of sewage treatment plants.

Zolsky

Group water supply is designed to provide high-quality drinking water to 15 rural settlements and the district center of the Zola municipal district.

The population of these settlements is more than 52 Thousands of people. In the area are located 77 social facilities (27 Schools, 13 Polyclinics, 21 Pre-school, 6 Music Schools, 10 Clubs).

The existing water supply networks were built in 1960 - 1970 years of the last century with a water consumption rate of 50 liters / day per person. Currently, water consumption has increased by 5 times and increased to 250 l / day per person due to gasification of these settlements and the use of gas columns.

Given the scale of the project, design and construction

Zola group water supply is divided into two stages.

The construction of the water pipeline was started within the framework of the federal target program "South of Russia" (2008 - 2013 years) in 2009 year. The estimated cost of construction of the first stage of the Zola group water pipeline is 821210,0 thousand rubles. The facility was put into operation in December 2016 St Petersburg.

The second stage provides for the supply of drinking water from

p.p. Habaz to specific consumers of the remaining 13 rural settlements.

Design and estimate documentation has been developed, the estimated cost of the object in prices of the IV quarter 2016 is 1530948,42 thousand rubles, the capacity of the object is 18692,97 cubic meters per day. Due to the lack of funding, the group water supply has not been started.

Phase II of Zolsky

Construction

The construction of the second stage of the Zola group water supply will be the final stage of organizing the supply of high-quality drinking water to the settlements of the district and will ensure the effective use of funds previously spent on group water supply.

Zolsky I Stage

Construction

"Sewage treatment

In Mr. More than 25 thousand people live in May. Due to the high wear of treatment facilities, it was decided to design the facility with a capacity of 2500 cubic meters per day. The estimated cost of the object is 239426,24 thousand rubles in the prices of the second quarter 2016 c.

Construction of a left-bank sewer in the city. Cold (according to

Mr. Maysky

Constructions

required

question

Except

So,

design and estimate documentation the estimated cost of completion of construction is more than 10 million rubles), treatment facilities and other settlements of the republic, including in the city. Nalchik (estimated cost - more than 37 million rubles), in p. Adiyukh (2-th stage, estimated cost of about 45 million rubles), in p. Kenje (Vol. The Keshev brothers, the estimated cost is more than 10 million rubles). The construction of these facilities will solve the problem of water disposal and improve the ecology of the region.

Features of the nature of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic the complexity of the geological structure and terrain cause an active manifestation of processes such as landslides, mudslides, avalanches, landslides and landslides.

The development of tourism is closely connected with the safe stay of tourists in the resort area of the republic. To reduce social tension and improve the image component of the tourist complex of the republic, it is necessary to direct efforts to eliminate landslide zones and comprehensive development of territories for resettlement of the population from dangerous areas for living. All this requires a systematic approach in terms of ensuring the safe life of the population of the republic and the safe stay of tourists on the territory of the republic.

One of the most acute

is to increase the protection of the population in living conditions in areas subject to landslide processes.

Questions

The total area of the republic subject to landslide processes is 4431 sq. km, registered landslide hazardous areas - 140. To update information on the number of people living in the landslide zone, the situation is periodically monitored, surveys of settlements of the republic are carried out.

Po

Kabardino - Balkarian

Specialists of Kabbalkgeomonitoring LLC conducted control engineering-geological surveys on the definition of landslide sites and prepared appropriate schemes of engineering-geological conditions for the development and distribution of landslide processes.

According to the results of the measures, it was established that the most vulnerable to the threat of landslide danger in the territory of the republic are 24 the City of Sorrow 6 Municipalities. On 13 April 2018 the Landslide Danger Zones 743 number of residents, number of residents - 3621 person.

According to preliminary calculations, the total area of housing for resettlement of citizens living in landslide danger zones in the territory of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is 63,441 thousand square meters.

For the resettlement of citizens living in avalanche-dangerous and landslide zones in the territory of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, according to preliminary calculations, more will be required 2,5 billion roubles.

Implementation

these events

Difficult because of

Onerous for the republican budget of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic financial costs and the absence of the state program of the Russian Federation, providing for the implementation of measures to resettle the population from landslide zones in the republic.

The main problems of the transport complex continue

stay:

Insufficient rate of rolling stock renewal; in urban areas with a relatively developed route network

Lack of or underdeveloped systems

and coordination of passenger traffic. State of the public

transport in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic requires a transition to a qualitatively new level of development that meets the requirements of the innovative economy, improving the quality, accessibility and safety of providing transport services to the population, the transfer of vehicles mainly

for gas engine fuel. To the most urgent problems of the road economy Kabardino

Balkar Republic includes:

under-repair of the road network; poor technical condition; non-conformity of the basis and coverage of roads with increased transport

Loads.

What

wear and tear

Under-repair of regional roads does not provide annual compensation for increases in the restoration of the road network. On 65% Roads of regional importance are not maintained interrepair periods, and some of them exceed the regulatory period 3 once. In order to eliminate the under-repair and further ensure the regulatory maintenance of regional roads, it is necessary to repair at least annually 200 km of roads and 19 Bridges.

subsequent

expenditure

The main problems of the fuel and energy complex (further -

FEC):

high degree of wear of the main energy resources, which results in low efficiency, increasing accident rate and high risks, which negatively affects the competitiveness of the economy, negatively affects the quality of life of the population and entails man-made threats;

loss of a significant part of scientific and technological potential in some

Fuel and energy industries;

insufficient degree of development of innovation sphere in the fuel and energy sector; preparation of reduction

personnel, insufficient level of interaction of fuel and energy companies with higher educational institutions;

Science and Technology

Quality

small property;

Efficiency of intellectual property management

Imperfection of innovation systems of companies; long technological lag in creation and development

modern combined-cycle and electric grid technologies.

In the social sphere, the most acute are the following:

problems.

Low standard of living of the population of the republic. Consumer price increases reduce real wages. The average per capita income of the population, the average monthly wage, the average size of pensions and social benefits are reduced relative to the subsistence minimum. The average per capita income in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic in the year 2018 was 66% from the national average, and the average monthly wage was 57%.

creates

The investigation

Economic and

social problems in the region. Negative

the migration unattractiveness of the migration balance 2018 The year was 3,4 Thousands of people. The largest group of retired (about 70%) Migrants in active working age 20 to 49 years, mainly qualified specialists. The trend of aging and migration outflow of the able-bodied population of the republic on the able-bodied population and budget. On 1000 The working-age population is 729 A person of incapacitated age. Number of pensioners 19,7% Population. Based on demographic processes, it should be expected that in the foreseeable future the population of the republic will continue to age. It is projected that c 2030 the Year of Older People 60 The years will be 25%, the East Coast 2050 The year - about 30% of the total number of residents of the republic, which will require an increase in spending on medical and social services of the population.

Demographic

significant

Load

Kabardino-Balkarian

Republic of the labour-surplus regions. In the economy and social sphere, 362 thousand people are employed. The working-age population, for various reasons not employed in the economy, exceeds 130 thousand people.

Remark

C

The total number of unemployed, calculated according to the methodology of the International Labor Organization, for the year 2018 amounted to 47,0 thousand people, or 10,4% from the labor force of the republic.

Employment of young people, their employment is an acute problem

After graduation from schools and vocational schools.

The lack of jobs and the high share of the agricultural sector of the economy caused low wages and incomes of the population.

In terms of wages, the republic has consistently occupied one of the last places among the constituent entities of the Russian Federation for many years.

Logistic

part of general education organizations is in poor condition, which does not allow to provide quality education at the modern level in accordance with the requirements of the new state

significant

Base

Standards. 77 schools, or nearly 30% The total number of built more 50 years ago and in need of reconstruction or major repairs, 8 schools do not have all types of improvement, buildings of a number of organizations are in an emergency condition.

It is necessary to withdraw the buildings of schools with such a level of wear and tear, from the

Transfer and transfer of students to new buildings.

Education in 34 schools (9,7 thousand students) is carried out in two

shifts.

To improve the availability and quality of general education, it should be possible to organize all types of educational activities in one shift, as well as the safety and comfort of learning conditions.

Total projected need up to 2025 for the introduction of new school

The number of seats is 12 thousand, including:

to provide one-shift training - 8,5 thousand places; to transfer students from buildings with a high degree

wear - 3,5 thousand seats.

In connection with the increase in the birth rate associated with measures of state support for families with children, the number of children of preschool age has increased significantly in the republic. They currently live in the Republic 81,8 Thousands of children from 0 to 7 years, of which 50,4 Thousands of children aged from 3 to 7 years.

However, the existing network of kindergartens, designed for 44 thousand seats, does not fully meet the growing demand for preschool education services.

In order to reduce the deficit of places in educational organizations of the republic and the organization of the educational process at the modern level, the construction and reconstruction of existing school buildings, the development of their material and technical base in accordance with the requirements of state educational standards are necessary.

Quantitative values of provision of health facilities in Kabardino-Balkarian Republic as a whole correspond to normative values and the average Russian level. At the same time, a significant part of the treatment and preventive decrepit, institutions of adapted premises that do not meet sanitary requirements and are not able to introduce high-tech methods of diagnosis and treatment.

posted

the University of London

V

Objectives

delivery

Specialty

High-tech medical care requires a serious improvement of the material and technical base of the Republican Children's Clinical Hospital, the Republican Clinical Hospital, the AIDS Control Center and infectious diseases dispensary, the Republican Dental Center, and a number of central district hospitals.

Psychoneurological

diseases,

Despite significant progress in reducing the incidence of socially significant diseases, there are still

high mortality rate from diseases of the circulatory system (396,1 per 100 thousand population) and neoplasms (120,4 cases per 100 thousand population). There is also a high incidence and mortality rate from tuberculosis.

Culture

Security of the population by institutions

Overall satisfactory. However, a significant part of cultural objects is located in buildings that require reconstruction or major repairs. Everywhere there is a large wear of equipment, musical instruments, stage costumes, a lack of lighting, sound and amplification equipment, a significant number of historical and cultural monuments with a high degree of destruction, damage and destruction, a shortage of qualified personnel, primarily for restoration work on cultural heritage sites.

Given the large concentration of archaeological monuments in the republic, it is necessary to strengthen control over compliance with the legislation in the field of protection of cultural heritage in the conduct of land management, earth, construction, road, land reclamation, economic and other works, as well as the development of urban and project documentation, town planning regulations, in which the content and should provide for measures, the use of cultural heritage objects.

providing

There are a number of problems related to the environmental situation, among them: the state of atmospheric air. One of the main characteristics that determine the environmental safety and attractiveness of any region is the state of atmospheric air. Road transport is the main air pollutant, accounting for about 80% emissions. Also, about 4 thousand tons of harmful (polluting) substances are emitted annually into the atmospheric air from stationary sources, a significant proportion belongs to landfills;

negative effects of water. The most striking and objective indicator of the quality of the natural environment in the republic is the state of water sources. Analysis of information based on long-term observations indicates a decrease in water quality in the rivers of the republic due to human economic activity. Floods and floods in the republic are sources of pollution of water management facilities located in water protection zones and in areas of projected flooding, and have a negative impact on the quality of water resources;

poor condition of sewage treatment plants and sewerage networks, their insufficient development. Many rural areas lack a centralized water disposal system. Due to the lack of sewerage networks in settlements, treatment facilities are loaded from 20 to 60%, a significant part of the wastewater accumulates in sumps, cesspools, filtration fields, which

It worsens the environmental situation. To eliminate non-standard wastewater treatment at facilities, it is necessary to build new and reconstruct existing sewerage facilities, replace outdated and failed technological and pumping equipment, replace emergency networks and collectors;

soil degradation and destruction due to water erosion, salinization, waterlogging, irrational land use. The area of such lands increases due to the extraction of minerals by the quarry method. In and floodplain rivers pebbles, sand, gravel, sand granite mixture provoke a change in the river bed, erosion of their banks, increases the likelihood of floods;

Unordered

result

Mining

of

organization of an effective system of waste management of production and consumption in the territory of the republic. Despite the work carried out in this direction, the problem of accumulation of production and consumption waste remains one of the main threats to environmental safety. The volume of waste generation is steadily increasing, followed by its disposal at landfills. With growing volumes of waste, the problem of their management is one of the most socially significant for all municipal districts and urban districts. Almost all municipal districts of the republic have unauthorized landfills. There are also a number of threats related to global change

Climate.

Geographically

The direction of air masses determines the diversity of climatic conditions in the territory of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.

terrain,

The situation,

The impact on the territory of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic of a wide range of dangerous natural processes and phenomena provokes various kinds of emergencies.

Given the global climate change around the world, the territory of the republic also appear uncharacteristic climate risks, and characteristic are changing. A possible increase in temperature in mountainous areas will lead to the ablation of glaciers, which can provoke an increase in the area of flooding and flooding. The increase in the intensity and frequency of abnormal weather events can lead to an increase in such phenomena as hurricanes, floods, drought. The intensity of the rainfall is important. As a rule, it is heavy rains that provoke the descent of mudflows and landslides.

Thus, in the territory of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic it is predicted

The following climate risks:

flooding of settlements and economic facilities as a result of

rain, snow, heavy rains;

emergency situations of the municipal level due to high activity of glacial collapse and breakthrough mudflow processes. Sources of Emergency

Initiated

Exogenous

processes,

situations and incidents: flow-forming rains, collapses of glaciers, breakthroughs of glacial tanks and lakes, anthropogenic activities;

occurrence of emergency situations related to the difficulty of traffic on roads in the spring-summer period due to landslides, landslides, sweeping the roadway;

occurrence of dangerous meteorological phenomena that can cause damage to the population and industries (breakage of power lines, damage to buildings and structures, difficulties in the work of transport and road services, flooding as a result of littering of storm and drainage windmills, damage to crops, etc.) due to strong wind (squalls, hurricanes), heavy rains, heavy snow, snowfall on wires, large hail.

Economics

effluents,

Despite the positive trends, the following problems hindering the development of small and medium-sized businesses remain relevant in the republic:

Insufficient start-up capital and own working capital

funds from small and medium-sized businesses;

Difficulties in obtaining loans from credit institutions and high

credit rates;

Administrative

development of entrepreneurial activity and forcing small and medium-sized businesses to go into the shadow economy.

Obstacles

barriers,

creates

The economic and political situation in some countries is difficult. At the same time, the Republic seeks to maintain its presence in the countries that are its traditional partners;

Sanctions policy and

enough

low popularity and activity of enterprises of the republic in the direction of foreign economic activity. There are few exporting companies in the country. About 140 participants are engaged in foreign economic activity, of which only 41 are engaged in export operations.

Enterprises of the republic restrain from making a decision on entering foreign markets gaps in marketing policy. This is the lack of information about foreign markets, the lack of international certificates, and the lack of qualifications of employees;

shortcomings of customs accounting of exported products. Some enterprises of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic make transactions for the export of products, bypassing the Mineralovodskaya customs of the North Caucasus customs department, others sell their products to exporting enterprises of neighboring subjects of the Russian Federation. As a result, the volume of products exported by manufacturers and companies of the republic from its territory is not taken into account by the customs statistics bodies as exports of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.

1.3. Comprehensive assessment of external and internal conditions of development of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

In order to identify the list of the main problems impeding the socio-economic development of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, an analysis of the weaknesses and strengths, as well as external opportunities and threats (SWOT-analysis) of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic was carried out.

Strengths

Weaknesses

high percentage of the population with the highest

concerning

low

education;

unique recreational potential;

Naturally-

good environmental condition; availability of minerals; large

significant

Hydropower

Stockpiles

potential of the rivers of the republic; favorable

soil-

climatic conditions; developed

transport infrastructure, developed road, rail and air high density roads;

Communications,

availability

availability of gas pipelines, gasification of the republic;

High population

Level of points

developed multi-service network;

Telecommunications

availability of a state system consisting of various support, financial property mechanisms aimed at both beginners and existing business entities;

and

developed

Support infrastructure for small and medium-sized businesses; availability

Free

Labor

productivity in the economy;

lack of own sources of investment resources of enterprises and organizations of the republic;

unsatisfactory

material and technical majority of enterprises;

Status of base

insufficiency

start-up capital and own working capital from medium small business entities;

and

Difficulties in obtaining loans from high

Organizations

and

credit interest rates;

Administrative

Barriers to development

hindering business activities;

Low income; high differentiation

Population by income level;

low

Housing security, c

Number of need

Great improvement of housing conditions;

Imbalance

Demand

and

labour supply; increasing

Deficit

Skilled workers

resources

Features

Threats

Sustainable economic growth in

complex

Foreign Economic Affairs

the Russian Federation; increasing the population of the republic;

conditions;

Welfare

Increasing market competitiveness; increasing market competitiveness

visa facilitation; tourism development; development

law enforcement practice, reducing administrative pressure on business;

Increase in the share of social and modern

Services

community levels;

capital;

Multi-year

hotbeds of interethnic and interfaith conflicts;

Neighborhood

Advanced Development of Tourism

other regions of the Russian Federation;

outflow of qualified personnel from

Republics;

development of science and scientific and technological progress

technology,

Increase in the share of imports in markets

Republic and curtailment of production;

1.4. Assessment of competitiveness and investment attractiveness of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The analysis of competitiveness and investment attractiveness of Kabardino-Balkaria shows that the republic has a number of competitive advantages, on the basis of which a modern, highly efficient economy can be formed. These include:

high level of gasification of settlements of the republic

natural gas (92,9%), extensive road network of good quality;

favorable climatic conditions, including for

production of environmentally friendly food and ecotourism;

availability

deep processing of which are in demand in the republican and Russian markets;

mineral resources, products

the presence of powerful recreational potential; a significant number of objects attractive for development (recreational, sports,

various types of domestic tourism cognitive, gastronomic, medical);

availability of raw materials for the development of livestock; large hydropower potential of the rivers of the republic; economy potentially

security

High

Labor

resources at the expense of the younger generation;

A wide range of legislative measures of the state

Support for investment activities.

Realization of these competitive advantages is possible only under the condition of carefully thought out, active and purposeful actions of the state authorities of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.

The investment policy is aimed at the implementation of the strategic goals defined by the Investment Strategy of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic until 2040:

creation

the Kabardino - Balkarian Republic

investment and business climate;

Increase in the amount of

various sources of investment in the economy of the republic to ensure a dynamic

economic growth and improving the living standards of the population.

To achieve the objectives of the Investment Strategy

It is necessary to solve the following tasks: administrative

elimination

infrastructure restrictions for the development of business and investment activities;

Barriers

and

Improving the effectiveness of the state support system

investment and business activities;

effective use of the investment potential of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic in accordance with established territorial and sectoral priorities;

creation of conditions for increasing innovation activity

business entities;

human development and improvement of the system of needs

orientated

preparation of high-tech and innovative industries;

specialists,

the City

formation and promotion of the image (brand) of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic as an open region favorable for investment activities.

Further improvement of the investment climate is possible through the expansion of financial incentives (tax and customs benefits, access to concessional financing, land lease benefits, guarantees, etc.), the development of the necessary basic infrastructure and the creation of effective processes for attracting potential investors and interacting with them. The republican legislation provides for the provision of state support in the form of state guarantees, tax incentives, the provision of land plots without tendering for the implementation of large investment projects, etc.

At the same time, it is necessary to implement measures aimed at attracting domestic and foreign investments. Such events include:

formation of a portfolio of investment proposals; placement of investment proposals

In the information-

telecommunications network "Internet" (hereinafter - the Internet);

analysis of investment activities of domestic and foreign companies operating on the Russian market in order to identify potential domestic and foreign investors;

participation in Russian and international exhibitions, etc. Within the framework of the Strategy

Possibly Development

following

Species

Foreign Investment: Attracting

Funds

Foreign

investment funds,

making both direct and portfolio investments;

obtaining foreign equipment on the basis of leasing; attracting foreign capital in an entrepreneurial form by creating joint ventures with a different share of foreign

participation, including by selling shares to foreign investors;

International

cooperation in technology transfer, creation of joint ownership;

production,

Accompanied

Creation of enterprises wholly owned by foreign companies

investors;

cooperation with foreign companies in the development of production

on the basis of a contract (contract) without the creation of a legal entity;

Attracting foreign capital through concession

agreements.

In order to create conditions for reorienting bank capital to invest in the real sector of the economy, strengthening the investment orientation in the activities of commercial banks and reducing the risk of long-term investment, it is necessary:

Simplify the procedure for the implementation of mortgages on loans; create reliable schemes for syndication of bank capital (banking and leasing pools, consortia) to finance capital-intensive investment projects of high social significance.

The priorities of the investment policy are aimed at developing the potential of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic in order to ensure faster economic growth and optimize its structure.

For the purpose of investment projects priority

The branches of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic are:

agro-industrial complex; tourism and recreation; construction complex: production of building materials and

housing development;

hydropower; metallurgical complex; social sphere and housing and communal services.

Section II. GOALS, TASKS AND BASIC DIRECTIONS OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE CABARDINO-BALKAR REPUBLIC

2.1. Goals and objectives of socio-economic development of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The strategic goal of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is to improve the well-being of the population on the basis of dynamic and sustainable economic growth. In this regard, it is relevant to create the necessary conditions for accelerated socio-economic development and improving the quality of life of the population of the republic.

To achieve this goal, the following decisions are required:

interrelated sets of tasks:

material well-being and quality improvement

life of the population;

dynamic, sustainable and balanced development of the economy; creation of favorable conditions for life; protection of the population and territory from natural man-made emergencies, fire safety and

and safety of people in water bodies.

2.2. Main directions of social sphere development

2.2.1. Improving the standard and quality of life of the population

One of the priorities of the socio-economic development of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is to improve the level and quality of life of people.

The main objectives of the state authorities in the implementation of the Strategy are to promote employment of the population with high pay and to ensure the basic needs of the inhabitants of the republic in housing, education, medical care, in the field of culture and sports.

In order to achieve these objectives, it is necessary to resolve the following

Tasks:

ensuring economic growth; combating unemployment, creating economically efficient jobs that allow to ensure a decent level of wages, developing small and stimulating self-employment;

the population allowing to earn enough to ensure an acceptable standard of living for the family, taking into account the dependency load (increase in the minimum wage, reform of wages of employees of budgetary organizations, etc.);

medium-sized businesses,

Working Group

conditions,

creation of an effective system of targeted social support (the elderly, the disabled, the unemployed,

vulnerable large families, socially disadvantaged families, etc.);

Population groups

Increasing the budget provision of social support measures

Population;

creating a barrier-free living environment for persons with disabilities and

other low-mobility categories of the population in the social sphere. The result of work in this direction will be: a decrease in the share of the population with incomes below the subsistence minimum.

14,2% in 2023 to 2,3% in 2040.

2.2.2. Demographic and migration policy

The objectives of the Strategy in the field of demographic policy for the period up to 2040 are a steady increase in the population of the republic, an increase in the life expectancy of the population, and the creation of conditions for reducing migration outflow from the republic.

To achieve the goals it is necessary to implement

the following tasks:

increase in the birth rate (including through birth)

The second child and subsequent children;

preservation and promotion of public health, increasing the role of

prevention of diseases and the formation of a healthy lifestyle;

Decreasing infant

mortality,

Population Mortality

working age;

creation of conditions for career development for residents of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and potential highly qualified migrants from other subjects of the Russian Federation.

These tasks will be addressed as a matter of priority.

The following measures have been implemented:

improvement of the system of early detection of diseases, previously oncological

Blood circulation and

Diseases

System

all diseases;

Formation of the population motivation to maintain a healthy image

life;

Improving the quality of health care for the population through

introduction of high-tech medical care;

improving the safety of the population; development of measures to support young professionals, including those employed in

the budget sector;

social support for the return and prevention of the outflow of Russian

Population.

As a result of solving these tasks, it is expected: an increase in the population of the republic by 3,5% (from 905,5 thousand tons).

2023 to 937,5 thousand people in 2040);

increase in the life expectancy of the population from 77,14 to

2023 to 81,8 years in 2040.

2.2.3. Labour market development, employment provision

The objectives of implementing social and economic policy in this direction are to provide the labor market of the republic with personnel in accordance with the current and future needs of the economy of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, to maintain social stability in society, to create conditions conducive to the effective development of the labor market.

The main objectives for achieving these goals are:

formation of an optimal investment policy aimed at improving the socio-economic situation in the republic and creating new industries in promising and priority types of economic activity that allow to provide work to residents of the republic;

creation of conditions for effective employment of the population, ensuring the balance of supply and demand in the labor market of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic in accordance with the current and future needs of the economy;

increasing the use of flexible forms of employment; increasing territorial and professional mobility

working population;

improving the quality of services in the field of employment promotion, including services for vocational guidance of citizens in order to choose the field of activity (profession), employment, vocational training and additional vocational education;

implementation of activities that promote employment of citizens,

Difficulty finding work;

Incentive

existing and creating new jobs, especially for citizens experiencing difficulties in finding work.

employers,

Retaining

The results of the implementation of measures in this direction will be: an increase in the number of people employed in the economy from 386,0 thousand people in

2023 to 464,3 thousand people in 2040;

decrease in the general unemployment rate from 9,1% in 2023 to 2,5% in 2040

year.

2.2.4. Education development

The objectives of the implementation of socio-economic policy in the field of education are to improve the quality and accessibility of preschool and general education, improve the system of training in the professions and specialties most in demand in the economy of the republic. The main objectives for achieving these goals are:

inclusion in a single educational space; development of the system of continuous education; improvement of the efficiency and quality of education management; stimulation of innovative activities in education, including the introduction of digital technologies, modern methods and forms of education, development of research and project potential of educational organizations;

support and development of pedagogical personnel, increase their

professional level, motivation and social status;

security

Accessibility

general, vocational and additional education for all categories of the population, including children with special educational needs, orphans, children from low-income families, children from remote and inaccessible territories;

pre-school,

Quality

and

Formation

students, the development of their creative and critical thinking, value orientations and life competencies.

Identity

Civil

Patriotism

and

To achieve the goals, the following are required:

Events:

major repairs of kindergartens, including equipment for training and

preschool educational organizations of education;

"targeted" construction of kindergartens; overhaul of educational organizations; «targeted» construction of schools; creation of a unified management of education in the territory of Kabardino-Slovakia

Balkar Republic;

organization of functioning of at least 1 support (rural) school in each municipality, corresponding to transport accessibility, including the possibility of obtaining additional education; increase in the prestige of pedagogical professions; timely identification and correction of features (deviations) in

development of children;

development of infrastructure of tourism and local lore

additional education of children in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

development of a system for physical culture and sports, assembly halls, libraries, classrooms for the organization of educational work and additional education of children, the creation of school volunteer centers, art workshops, creative and material-technical for the implementation of educational programs of basic general and secondary general education in the subjects "Basics of safety and protection of the homeland", "Labour (Technology)";

equipment

Cabinets

development of a system of comprehensive support for gifted children and

talented youth;

training of middle-level specialists for the sectors of education, health, culture, services, tourism and creative industries within the framework of the federal project "Professionality";

Expected results: 203 kindergartens were overhauled; 5255 additional places were created in 37 kindergartens; kindergartens are equipped with medical offices; 100% access to preschool education for children from 2 has been achieved

months. up to 8 years from the place of residence;

155 buildings of general education organizations were repaired; 11390 places were created in 33 schools. New schools have created conditions for the development of additional education of the scientific profile, equipped with material and technical base of medical offices;

a unified education management system was created, 100% schools

transferred to the regional level of management;

There is a network of support in all municipalities

schools;

The system of remuneration of teachers has been improved; the need for teachers of preschool and general education has been closed; the qualification of teachers and managerial staff has been increased

personnel;

Coverage of children aged 5 to 18 years with additional education

increased to 82%;

A qualitatively new level of education has been achieved

human, society and state.

2.2.5. Health development

In order to ensure the availability and quality of medical care that meets the needs of the population, it is necessary to solve the following tasks:

prioritizing prevention in health care and

development of primary health care;

improving the effectiveness of specialized, including high-tech, medical care, ambulance, including emergency specialized, medical care, medical evacuation;

development and

introduction of innovative diagnostic methods,

prevention and treatment, as well as the basics of personalized medicine;

improving the efficiency of the maternity and childhood services; development of medical rehabilitation of the population and improvement

sanatorium-resort treatment systems, including children;

Palliative Care for Incurables

patients, including children;

providing a highly qualified health care system and

Motivated staff;

providing affordable and quality medical care

population, including children;

Ensuring the systematic organization of health care. The following tasks will be implemented to achieve the objectives set out below:

Measures:

development of the system of medical prevention of non-infectious diseases

diseases and the formation of a healthy lifestyle;

development of primary health care, as well as early detection of diseases, pathological conditions and risk factors

their development, including medical examinations and medical examinations of the population;

education and awareness-raising, including for children and young people, about healthy lifestyles, the consequences of tobacco use and alcohol abuse, including the development, implementation and development of information communications;

security

Healthy and Safe Food for the Population

All age groups involved in the optimization of the diet and the nature of nutrition, as well as education and training of various population groups on healthy nutrition, including with the participation of organizations involved in these issues;

promotion and stimulation of active lifestyle, education

population in matters of physical culture;

development of physical therapy and physical culture directed

to maintain health;

medical examination of the population with the allocation of risk groups for development

socially individual programs of medical prevention;

non-infectious

Diseases

significant

and

promotion

qualifications and retraining of medical and

pharmaceutical workers;

state support for certain categories of medical workers (providing social support measures to certain categories of specialists, primarily the most scarce);

creation of a competitive environment of public and private ownership, development of public-private partnership in the healthcare sector.

Expected results: reduced mortality from all causes with 7,5 on 1000 Population up to 6,0 in

2040 (for 1000 population);

reduction of mortality from circulatory system diseases from 349,9 to

250 in 2040 (for 100 thousand population);

reduction of mortality rate from neoplasms, including malignant ones, from 119,4 cases to 100 cases in 2040 (100 thousand population);

Reduction of infant mortality rate from 3,6 to 3,4 in 2040 (as of 1)

A thousand born alive.

2.2.6. Development of physical culture and sports

In the framework of the development of physical culture and sports in Kabardino,

The priorities of the Balkar Republic are:

increasing the accessibility of sports and sports organizations for all residents of the republic, the development of the infrastructure of physical culture and sports, including children's and youth sports schools;

development of sport of highest achievements;

providing opportunities for physical culture and

Sports for persons with disabilities and persons with disabilities;

System

organizations providing sports-qualified health and sports work with various categories and groups of the population.

Physical Culture and Sports

Executors

The trainers,

In order to involve and increase interest in systematic physical education and sports, maintain a healthy lifestyle of all age categories of the population and achieve indicative indicators, it is necessary to provide solutions in a number of areas:

Together with local self-government bodies, it is necessary to work on the integrated development of sports infrastructure and updating the material and technical base, which will allow the population to lead facilities, a healthy lifestyle located within walking distance;

Modern

Sports

the City

It is necessary to increase the number and systematize the organization and physical fitness and events, including the holding of sports competitions among various groups of the population, as well as competitions among school clubs;

Mass Sports

to create a unified system of adaptive sports in the republic to attract people with disabilities to regular physical education and sports at the place of residence, to intensify work on physical fitness and sports mass work among people with disabilities;

It is planned to consider the issues of increasing the number of teachers of sports institutions and their level of average wages, bringing in 2030 to the level of average wages according to the forecast of socio-economic development of the republic.

Integrated work on the development of physical culture and sports

By the year 2040:

to increase the proportion of citizens involved in systematic physical education and sports in 2030 to at least 70,0%, and in 2040 to 80%;

improve conditions for physical culture and sports at the place of residence for all categories of citizens by building and commissioning new sports facilities;

increase the availability of sports facilities, including for persons with

disabled health and disabled people;

increase

quantity

children,

the University

the University of London

Sports

institutions;

to establish the Republic as a centre for the conduct of significant and

interregionally,

All - Russian

Events

Sports at international level.

2.2.7. Cultural development

The strategic goal of the industry is to preserve the cultural heritage of the republic, the development and implementation of the cultural and spiritual potential of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic as the basis for sustainable and dynamic development of the region.

The basic directions of the Culture Strategy are: strengthening and development of the material and technical base of cultural institutions, including reconstruction and overhaul of cultural institutions, improvement of their equipment;

development of public interest in the historical and cultural heritage

Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

stimulation and support of folk art (folk art centers, houses of crafts, centers of traditional folk culture, etc.);

development of professional and amateur art of all kinds and

genres;

organization and conduct of interregional and international

exchange tours of state cultural institutions;

participation in competitions, conferences, festivals, focused on both the realization of the creative potential of the population and the integration of Kabardino-Balkarian Russian at the cultural interregional, all-Russian and international levels;

Cultural infrastructure

for development

space,

Republic

Exchange

development of public-private partnership in the field of culture, involvement of business entities in the implementation of cultural policy in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

State support for non-profit organizations in the field of

culture and art;

preservation and state protection of cultural heritage objects,

located on the territory of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

introduction of new information technologies in various fields

Culture;

creation of modern multifunctional cultural and leisure centers of a new type (including a concert hall, a library, rooms for clubs and sections, an area of free access to the Internet, a cafe, rooms for meetings and training sessions, offices, a career guidance center, provision of information, legal and financial services, etc.).

Consulting

Centers

Expected results: increased number of visits to cultural organizations by 35%

compared with 2023;

increase in the share of cultural heritage objects in satisfactory condition in the total number of cultural heritage objects of federal, regional and local significance in the year 2040

60%.

2.2.8. Working with youth

Given the value of harmoniously developed youth for society, it is necessary to concentrate efforts on a number of areas of work with youth:

patriotic

Promotion of moral formation of conditions for the spiritual, moral, patriotic and physical development of young people;

Education.

and

Involvement in socio-economic construction. Creating conditions for realizing the potential of young people in the socio-economic sphere;

Encouragement of volunteer projects. Development of Volunteer

(volunteer) and student movements, the institute of mentoring;

Support for young people in difficult situations. Assistance to young citizens who find themselves in a difficult life situation, persons from among orphans and children left without parental care, as well as persons with disabilities; infrastructure. youth

Expansion of infrastructure opportunities for youth development, improvement of the level of improvement and comfort of young people in the municipalities of the region;

creation

promotion of creative abilities of young people. Creating conditions for identifying and promoting talented youth and their innovative activities.

2.2.9. Development of charitable and voluntary

(Volunteer) Activities

In order to expand opportunities for self-realization of citizens, increase the role of volunteering (volunteerism) in social development, (volunteer) formation of innovative practices of social activities, it is necessary to strengthen work in the following areas:

Volunteering

Distribution

and

creation of conditions for the demand for the participation of volunteer organizations and volunteers (volunteers) in solving social problems, as well as increasing the recognition of volunteering in society;

supporting existing activities and creating conditions for

the emergence of new volunteer organizations;

development of consulting, and volunteer (voluntary) activities;

Educational

Infrastructure

methodically,

Resurs

information, support

Increasing cross-sectoral collaboration in the field of

Volunteering, including the interaction of volunteer organizations with other organizations of the non-profit sector, business, public authorities and local self-government bodies, state and municipal institutions, the media, international, religious and other interested organizations;

security

volunteering activities of all age groups of the population - children, youth, adults and older people.

Opportunities

Participation

For

the University of London

2.2.10. Development of non-commercial support infrastructure

Organizations

To promote the development of the non-profit sector of the economy, including the provision of conditions for the creation and development of socially oriented non-profit organizations, the dissemination of new technologies and best practices in the social sphere, it is necessary to develop infrastructure to support non-profit organizations in a number of areas:

Creating catalogues of best practices. Maintenance and updating of databases

non-profit organizations, volunteers, technologies, services;

Involvement of active citizens in activities

development of the social sphere;

implementation of effective practices of public-private partnership

in the social sphere;

formation of partnerships, networks, coalitions of NGOs; assistance in the creation of new resource centers, as well as funds

Local communities; assistance

the University of London

Formation

Funds

Targeted

Capital

non-profit organizations;

development, distribution and implementation of mechanisms of private and corporate charitable donations. Motivation of business to solve social issues;

organization and support of grants for NGOs, as well as competitions from extrabudgetary sources, including the administration of competitive procedures, monitoring and evaluation of implemented projects that have received support;

methodological support for the development and implementation of municipal programs for supporting NGOs, including conducting examinations, developing standards and procedures;

conducting research, monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of programs

Support for NGOs;

improving the effectiveness of the relevant advisory and advisory bodies of local self-government, as well as councils in social institutions.

2.2.11. Development of the market of services in the social sphere on a competitive basis

The main directions of development of the market of services in the social sphere

On a competitive basis should be:

Diversification

services. It involves the provision of a variety of social services and services, the formation of its own market segment in the interests of the client and obtaining economic benefits;

Social Services and

public-private partnership. It should be based on projects to develop new social technologies and approaches in the field of social services, as well as expanding the range of services with grants;

support to non-governmental organizations; ensuring equal competitive access to budgetary funds; creation of a system of independent assessment of the quality of social work

institutions.

2.3. The main directions of economic development of Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

2.3.1. Industry development

Total

strategy

Industrial

The republic is focused on the transition to high-tech, innovative, high-tech production of competitive products, expanding export potential. The following priority areas should be developed:

Smooth

production,

Policy

the University of London

innovative model of industry development; quality, efficiency and safety of final products; production of high-tech products; development of export-ready industries and new developments; full shipped increase in production of which is located in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

products,

Volumes

Cycle

creation

economic conditions,

stimulating the accelerated renewal of the main production assets of the industrial complex of the Republic of the products;

Competitiveness

Increase

For

concentration of resources for solving priority problems; balanced development of various types of production; ensuring a balance of interests of the state, business and public

institutions interested in the sustainable operation of the complex;

Maximizing the use of available competitive advantages

Kabardino-Balkarian Republic in the field of industry.

The strategic goal is to create conditions for the development of the industrial complex of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic on the basis of innovative renewal of industries, ensuring an increase in their economic security, resource saving and increasing the competitiveness of products in the required nomenclature, quality and volume of supplies.

efficiency,

Environmental

serves

Strategy

development of conceptual industry, stimulation of pilot projects and the most important investment technical re-equipment in the field of science-intensive production, demanded by the market of new generation products.

Modernization

projects

Base

For

the City Council

and

Other strategic goals include: expanding production of products with increased added

cost, reducing the resource intensity of production;

improvement

Investment

Attraction

Industrial

enterprises of the republic, including for foreign investments;

Incentive

Creation

New

Modern

Enterprises

manufacturing industry;

Expanding markets for products. In order to achieve the goals, it is necessary to provide a solution

the following main tasks:

promotion

Production

industrial enterprises on the basis of technical re-equipment and modernization, the introduction of new technologies of breakthrough high-performance industries, the intensification of innovative activities of enterprises, import substitution, reducing the technological and commodity dependence of the industry on other regions;

providing

Capacity Building

Creation

and

security

Economic

production, significant growth of labor productivity, environmental safety of technological processes and products, resource saving, increasing the culture of production;

Efficiency

formation of a civilized consumer market and market intersectoral infrastructure, distribution network, commercial ties with the regions of the Russian Federation, countries of near and far abroad;

Interregional

development

and

Incentive

Investment

increasing the efficiency of innovative and development of high-tech industries, attracting innovative development funds; cooperation,

development of inter-territorial and inter-sectoral interaction of subjects of science, industry, small business;

activity,

Integration

Depth

processes

and

development of the system of reproduction of labor resources, training and retraining of workers, managers and managerial personnel capable of skillfully conducting production and business in an open market;

legislative support of the sustainable position of domestic

manufacturers in the domestic market, improving customs and credit policies, stimulating the export of products.

Directions for the development of the industrial complex. In the industry sector, until 2040, it is planned to implement investment projects of various orientations, which will allow industrial development of production potential, attract investment and create new high-performance jobs.

import substitution,

activate

growth

The development of light industry will contribute to the implementation of

investment project to create a large textile factory.

Modern

In Kabardino-Balkarian Republic there is a large number of light industry enterprises specializing in the production of sewing, textile and footwear products, equipped with light modern industry, provide the economy of the republic. On

Today, light industry enterprises of the republic are under pressure in connection with the rise in the cost of raw materials and components for enterprises of the clothing industry, chemical reagents), as well as logistics costs.

equipment. substantial

influence on

Enterprises

In particular

raw materials

(in

The implementation of the project will minimize costs and increase the added value of products produced in the republic in the field of light industry.

The production capacity of the investor Mirtex LLC is currently located in the Ivanovo region. The company is one of the leaders of the Russian market and is interested in implementing a project for the production of textile products in the territory of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic with an estimated cost 5 billion Rubles, from which 2,5 billion Rubles are your own money. Estimated production volumes before 1300 Tons per month. Number of jobs - 1500.

As a result of the project, the largest textile production complex will be created, providing the main raw materials for the light industry enterprise of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.

The development of the metallurgical industry is due to the resumption of the development of the Tyrnyauz tungsten-molybdenum field, the technical re-equipment of the joint-stock company to produce Terekalmaz. import-substituting carbide tools, as well as to develop industrial cooperation.

Products:

Implementation

Diamond

projects

will allow

and

In accordance with the instruction of the President of the Russian Federation to the Government of the Russian Federation from 27 October 2016 No Pr-2077 in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, the project "Renewal of production and processing of tungsten-molybdenum ores of the Tyrnyauz

fields", realization of metallurgical cluster in the North-Eastern Federal District. This project has a total cost 55 billion rupees, within which the order will be created 700 Jobs.

the Department

Project

Basic

the City Council

In the medical industry, Sevkavrentgen-D is planned

with limited implementation of the investment project on creation of import-substituting serial production of medical X-ray competitive equipment and equipment for X-ray equipment.

C

In 2022, a project was implemented in the republic to resume the work of the glass container production plant of Chegem Glass Plant LLC. Currently, the plant employs more than 300 people. The plant operates at full capacity - more than 170 million units of finished products in terms of annual volume. Currently, bank financing measures are being carried out for the design and attraction of construction at the plant of the second stage of production, which will double the volume of production of finished products.

The most important priority for the development of the industrial complex

The current stage is its transfer to an innovative path of development.

It is necessary to develop and implement a set of measures aimed at: (attracting an increase in investment for structural restructuring, modernization of production, the use of mechanisms for attracting private financial investment resources, the introduction of new production technologies);

Attraction

Investment

Terms and Conditions

creation

and competitiveness will give a quantitative and qualitative growth in the production of industrial products (due to the expansion and modernization of various industries);

Industrial

Efficiency

production,

Increase

For

What

creation of science-intensive high-tech industries based on the use of the intellectual and personnel potential of enterprises, including the military-industrial complex of the republic;

economic and financial mechanisms to enhance

innovation in industry;

development of incentive system for the development of innovation

activities;

participation in the development and implementation of republican and federal target programs in the field of development of scientific, technical and innovative activities, making changes to these programs in accordance with the established procedure.

Creation and development of the nanotechnology market.

The development of nanotechnology is currently considered as one of the priority areas of science and technology in the Russian Federation.

One of the prerequisites for the development of the nanotechnology market in the republic

there are large universities of interregional importance and training specialists for the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and neighboring regions of the Russian Federation. On the basis of federal state budget educational institutions of higher education "Kabardino State University. H.M. Berbekova" and Balkarsky "Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V.M. Kokova" is conducted scientific and technical with fundamental research, which are of a unique nature.

development,

Related

One of the current issues is the training of highly qualified personnel. On the basis of the Engineering and Technical Faculty of Kabardino-Balkarian State University, the innovative scientific and educational center "High Technologies in Mechanical Engineering" began its work, which is engaged in the training of modern personnel, research in the field of the application of materials processing technologies using a modern high-performance tool. In the interests of the innovative industries created in the republic, together with the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, work is being carried out on retraining, advanced training and internship of specialists in Russian and foreign educational organizations.

The following additional

measures:

Restoration of the system of training of workers in the republic

industry through vocational training;

creation

the University of London

New Universities

Specialties and

specializations,

in demand in promising areas of industry;

development of training programs and retraining of specialists

Specialty schools; increase

Quality

internships;

educational programs,

Organization

In the first phase, the development of new products and

technologies of specialists with experience in industrial science;

salary increase.

2.3.2. Development of agriculture

Accessibility

The fundamental goal in the development of the agro-industrial complex is to ensure food security, taking into account the products of the economic agro-industrial complex, increase the volume of exports of agro-industrial investment activities in the agro-industrial complex, as well as provide the territories with Kabardino-Balkaria complex Republic.

Incentive

Consumer

complex,

Rural

Development

For

The achievement of these objectives is envisaged through the

the following tasks:

stimulation of growth of crop production,

creation

livestock, food and processing industries; use

agricultural land, including land reclamation activities;

Taking action,

directed

effective

Attraction

Terms and Conditions

For

the City

the University of London

highly qualified personnel;

stimulation of creation of new commodity mass of agricultural products, in

including products with high added value;

promotion of activities,

directed

the City

Technical

Re-equipment of the agro-industrial complex;

implementation of measures aimed at digitalization of the industry; creation of conditions for increasing the number of small-form entities

management and agricultural cooperation;

creation of conditions for the development of seed production and use of seeds

Domestic production; development

Accelerated rural infrastructure;

social, engineering,

Communal

stabilization of the rural population,

increasing their well-being.

An important role in increasing production volumes

Crop production plays the development of a melioration complex.

The development of land reclamation is more relevant than ever for the republic. The bulk of the territory, due to the lack of natural water resources, is characterized as arid and semi-arid. Due to global climate change, there has been an increase in average annual temperature and a change in rainfall patterns over the years, leading to an increase in the frequency of dry periods. This, in turn, leads to a lack of moisture in the soil, a decrease in crop yields and their gross fees.

Given this fact, agricultural producers in recent years have been building reclamation systems at an accelerated pace. As a result, irrigation covered 73,5 thousand hectares, or 56,6% from the area of conditionally irrigated lands, of which 129,8 thousand hectares in the republic. This is a high indicator.

Over the past five years (2019-2023gg.) more than 30 thousand hectares of irrigated land were put into operation. It is expected that at least 5 thousand hectares of irrigated land will be commissioned annually.

Currently, there are about 374 wide-grabbing rain machines and more than 23 sprinkler irrigation systems in the republic.

Implementation of measures in the field of land reclamation in the republic is carried out within the framework of the regional project "Export of agricultural products"

National project "International Cooperation and Export" and departmental program "Development of the melioration complex of Russia".

Largely due to the active development of land reclamation in the republic

Production

increase

Volumes

They produce crops annually.

In irrigated areas, the yield of corn is 100-120 centners per hectare, and for non-irrigated - no more 70 centners per hectare. On repeated crops, the yield of corn for grain reaches 80 centners per hectare.

One of the priorities of the agro-industrial complex of the republic

It is the construction of fruit stores.

The growth of fruit and vegetable production requires the development of capacities for long-term storage of fruits and vegetables. Today, modern fruit and vegetable storage facilities with a total capacity of 298,5 thousand tons are functioning in the republic, including 42 fruit storage facilities with a total capacity of 223,5 thousand tons and 1 wholesale distribution center (OOO "Prokhodnoye") with a capacity of 75 thousand tons.

The availability of sufficient storage capacities for fruit and vegetable products using modern technologies and additional processing of products (sorting, calibration and packaging) have a significant impact on improving the profitability of horticultural activities, allow to ensure entry into trade networks, as well as extend the period of providing the population with fresh vegetables and fruits of domestic production and reduce the amplitude of price fluctuations for these products during the year.

Tribal animal husbandry plays a key role in the formation of livestock production. Tribal animal husbandry is necessary for breeding breeding of breeding animals in order to improve the productive qualities of farm animals and the breeding of highly productive farm animals.

The growth of livestock production is planned to be ensured through the development of breeding livestock, increasing the effective productivity of animals, and developing the use of the potential of mountain pastures.

feed base,

On the territory of the republic, 21 breeding farms operate (some farms operate in several areas of breeding livestock).

It is necessary to continue work on improving the breeding composition of breeding farm animals using a scientific approach, together with the Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V.M. Kokova" and the Institute of Agriculture - a branch of the FSBI "Federal Scientific Center "Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences".

The total area of fish-breeding areas in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is 3,0 thousand hectares. The main directions of fish farming in

The republic has commercial fish farming and recreational development of aquaculture (sports and amateur fishing). The growth of commercial fish production is planned to be ensured by creating its own feed base, improving the quality of breeding stock, applying the polyculture of pond fish, introducing and acclimatizing new breeds and types of fish.

In the field of development of maximum processing of agricultural products for the construction of meat and cold, processing capacity of milk, grain, processing and canning of vegetable and fruit and berry products.

Investment

necessary

Implementation

projects

In the field of market regulation and development of market infrastructure of the agro-industrial complex of the republic, it is necessary to organize a regional wholesale and food market, ensure access of local producers to trade networks, fairs, exhibitions, etc.

Improvement of housing, living and social conditions of the population in rural settlements is carried out within the framework of the state program "Integrated development of rural areas of the Kabardino-Balkar Republic", which has been implemented since 2020 and is aimed at stabilizing the population living in rural areas and accelerating the development of social, engineering, and communal infrastructure.

This state program carries a high social burden, is designed to prevent the outflow of qualified personnel from rural areas, to improve the quality of life of the rural population. In addition, it is based on the project principle of implementation, which allows the integrated development of rural areas and rural agglomerations, purposefully increasing their economic and social potential.

The main directions of implementation of the state program are "Modern appearance of rural areas", "Development of transport infrastructure in rural areas", "Advancing rural areas". During the period from 2020 to 2024, social and engineering infrastructure facilities were built and reconstructed under the State Program.

To ensure

socio-economic development

The Government of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic has approved by Decree No. 30 March 2023 No. 56-PP a list of strongholds of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and adjacent territories.

Development, approval and implementation of long-term plans for the socio-economic development of strongholds and adjacent modern infrastructure in the field of education, medicine, culture, sports, accessible to residents of the relevant territories.

Territories

Creation

Base

Will become

As a result of the implementation of the main directions of development in agriculture, an increase in the volume of agricultural products is expected in 2040 the Year 275,0 billion roubles.

2.3.3. Development of the construction complex

A component of a high quality of life at any time is the availability of comfortable housing, provided with a reliable communal infrastructure.

In the coming years, it is planned to maintain the trends in the development of housing construction along with improving the quality of housing under construction. The main form of investment activity in housing construction will be the financing of objects at the expense of own and borrowed funds of an investor engaged in the construction of housing for the purpose of sale, including using the mechanism of escrow accounts within the framework of the Federal Law on Housing 30 December 2004 № 214-FZ On participation in the shared construction of apartment buildings and other real estate and on amendments to some legislative acts of the Russian Federation. High

The use of effective technologies for building construction and maintenance is also ensured. The increased volume of housing construction, the development of mortgage housing lending, the competition of developers will provide citizens with the opportunity to meet their housing needs.

Quality of Modern

building materials,

Housing under construction

will be

A

The ongoing urban development policy will be focused on integrated development and infrastructure support of territories in accordance with territorial planning.

approved

Documents

C

To ensure affordable and quality housing

Necessary:

creating conditions for the development of mass housing construction administrative barriers in the housing market

removal by construction;

encouraging investors to create a market for affordable rental housing, the development of a non-profit housing stock for citizens with low income;

creation of conditions for the development of mortgage housing lending; stimulation of the use of new technologies and materials in housing construction, including those that meet the requirements of energy saving;

creation of conditions for use in the construction of low-rise energy supply and utilities

Technology

Autonomous infrastructure housing.

2.3.4. Tourism

The tourism sector is one of the most promising industries in terms of potential contribution to the socio-economic development of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, including the solution of the problem of employment, growth of tax revenues, stimulation of the development of transport infrastructure and related industries.

the City Council

Project

creation

Implementation

The tourist and recreational complex "Elbrus" as part of the tourist and recreational special economic zone (hereinafter referred to as "Elbrus"), the work on which is carried out in conjunction with JSC "KAVKAZ.RF", acting as the management company of the special economic zone, is of key importance.

All - Season

The aim of the project is to stimulate investment activity and attract capital to the economy, create a modern tourist infrastructure, as well as increase the tourist flow in Elbrus to 1 million people per year.

As a result of the implementation of the VTRK "Elbrus" project 2030 The year will be created 2384 jobs and 4438 New places for tourists. The cost of goods and services produced will be more 20 billion roubles.

It will also operate on its territory 35 km of ski slopes and 12 The cable cars. Open parking is already in operation 800 car seats (total area 28000 square meters) and area with shopping pavilions and stage (total area 4500 sq. m) One-way bypass road with length also opened 350 m.

V

Conform

the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 23 July 2024 № 1959Nalchik resort is recognized as a resort of federal importance. Nalchik resort is a balneoheat and mountain climatic resort with a specialization in the treatment and prevention of diseases of the circulatory system and nervous system, musculoskeletal system and connective tissue, digestive organs, genitourinary system, endocrine system diseases, eating disorders and metabolic disorders, as well as skin diseases and subcutaneous tissue.

The rich traditions of sanatorium-resort service of the population and rehabilitation therapy of the resort as an all-Russian health resort count almost 100 years. The presence of unique natural healing resources and, importantly, qualified medical personnel creates favorable conditions for the development of medical tourism in the republic.

The Kabardino-Balkarian Republic during the twentieth century played a significant role in the development of domestic spa and restorative medicine. Given the importance of preserving the health and recreation base of the resort, it is necessary to give impetus to the development of the resort. Development

This direction will not only attract new tourists, but also create additional jobs, improve the quality of life of the local population and strengthen the image of the region as one of the centers of health and rehabilitation in Russia.

Taking into account that the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic has been and remains one of the most popular and significant recreation areas in the Russian Federation, where in recent years there has been an active growth in tourist flow, it is necessary to pay attention to the development of such types of tourism as rural, environmental, automotive, which are becoming increasingly popular among Russian and foreign travelers. In recent years, within the framework of national projects, a lot of work has been done to bring roads into a normative state, which contributes to the organization of comfortable logistics for holidaymakers, road construction work is actively underway on roads leading to popular tourist attractions, including in mountainous areas, new accommodation facilities are being built, including taking into account the principles of sustainable tourism. These types of tourism represent an important and promising segment of the tourism industry of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, contributing not only to the economic development of the region, but also to the preservation of its unique cultural and natural environment, the formation of patriotism and interest in the history and culture of its homeland. With globalization and growing interest in eco-friendly and authentic travel, tourism is becoming a key tool for attracting tourists who want to immerse themselves in local traditions and lifestyles.

In order to create a modern tourist and recreational complex, which provides ample opportunities to meet the needs of holidaymakers, the following tasks will be solved:

tourist infrastructure in order to form a competitive tourist offer and improve the quality of tourist services and tourism security;

Modern

security

Development

and

development of popular and promising recreational areas of the republic (creation of a modern multi-profile resort of world level on the basis of mountain recreation and significance of Nalchik, creation, improvement of the resort of federal reconstruction and development of the material and technical base of medical and health areas of Auschiger and Dzyla-Su, others);

"Prielbrussier,"

Complex

development

creation of conditions for ensuring the transport accessibility of tourist resources of the republic through the development of a network of highways, multifunctional zones of road service, railway and air communication;

providing roads and mountain areas with quality

mobile communication and Internet connection, as well as digital services;

improving the convenience of travel on the territory of Kabardino-Balkaria

the Republic and ensuring the availability of tourist products, including for persons with disabilities;

creation of prerequisites for the socio-economic development of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and the development of new strongholds of economic growth;

creating conditions for the creation of new jobs of various

qualifications and specializations;

creation of favorable conditions for attracting investment in the development of the necessary accompanying and supporting infrastructure, including for organizations from related sectors of the economy;

creation of conditions for the development of entrepreneurship through entrepreneurship mechanisms,

support of those involved in the development of tourism and the hospitality industry;

Subjects of small

Middle

and

creating conditions for increasing tax revenues in the

consolidated budget of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

development and implementation of a marketing plan aimed at promoting the tourist product of the Kabardino-Balkar Republic in the domestic and foreign markets of services.

The implementation of these tasks will allow achieving the following goals: comprehensive development of tourism, including the sanatorium and resort industry in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, by creating conditions for the formation and promotion of a quality, competitive tourist product;

strengthening the social role of tourism, increasing the availability of services

tourism, recreation and recreation for citizens;

Strengthening the role and contribution of the tourism and hospitality industry

Social and economic development of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.

Expected results: increase in the number of tourists visiting Kabardino-Balkaria

Republic, up to 3,5 million people per year;

increase the share of tourism in the gross regional product to 10%.

2.3.5. Small and medium-sized enterprises

V

within

"Small

Project

Executed

National

medium entrepreneurship and support of individual entrepreneurial initiative" ("Creation of favorable conditions for self-employed middle and citizens", entrepreneurship "Creation of conditions for an easy start and comfortable doing business"), which ensure the introduction of a service approach in the provision of state support to business.

Regional

"Accessories

Subjects

Project

Small

and

3

Addressing the challenges posed by regional projects will enable investment to

create an increase in attractiveness and development of small and medium-sized businesses.

necessary

Terms and Conditions

The regional project "Creation of favorable conditions for self-employed citizens" contains a list of activities for self-employed citizens in order to ensure an easy start of their activities and development.

The regional project "Creation of conditions for an easy start and comfortable doing business" contains a list of activities for individuals planning to start entrepreneurial activities and beginning entrepreneurs, contributing to their formation and development.

The regional project "Accession of small and medium-sized businesses" contains a list of complex measures for existing entrepreneurs to ensure their growth and development, as well as access to foreign markets.

The implementation stage of regional projects in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic will create the basis for the further effective development of small and medium-sized businesses.

Implementation

National

Medium-sized entrepreneurship and support for individual entrepreneurial initiative” will be completed in 2024. From 2025 years will be in the framework of the national project "Effective and competitive economy" will begin to operate a federal project "Small and medium-sized businesses and support individual entrepreneurial initiative".

Project

"Small

and

2.4. Main directions of development of scientific and innovative sphere

The infrastructure of scientific, technical and innovative activities of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is a set of universities, scientific institutions, enterprises and organizations of various forms of ownership and sectoral orientation, ministries and departments that have scientific and technical councils and structural units in their composition.

The Republic specializes in fundamental and applied scientific research in a wide range of areas in mathematics, physics, geophysics, chemistry, biology, nanotechnology, ecology, agricultural sciences, humanities, in the resort and health sphere, etc.

Currently, scientific institutions and universities are developing

Innovative projects with a market perspective.

However, the insufficient scale of implementation of scientific developments is due to the lack of own funds from enterprises and the insufficient demand of the economy for technological innovations.

In this direction, the following tasks are priorities: conducting scientific research focused on priority areas of socio-economic development, while striving to include

in the educational process of their results, attracting students to scientific activities;

improving the quality and increasing the number of competitive scientific

works of students and postgraduates;

implementation

effective positioning of research and development in the intellectual property market, search for potential customers of scientific developments;

Systemic and

expanding the range of contacts with leading scientific centers and

individual scientists in various fields of knowledge;

participation in scientific and educational projects, exhibitions, other international

Funded

Russian

and

activities, organizations;

stimulating the participation of young scientists, postgraduates, doctoral students in scientific research conducted in the republic in order to strengthen and reproduce higher education, the personnel potential of science and improve the system of training and retraining of personnel in the innovative sphere;

support of basic and applied research, results

which are of great importance for the Republic;

effective use of innovative potential on the basis of cooperation of scientific departments, universities, research institutes and commercial scientific groups engaged in industry research and development;

formation of a regional order for targeted scientific developments and innovative solutions in the main spheres and sectors of social production.

In the field of intellectual property, a number of

tasks, among them:

development of intellectual property market infrastructure to create conditions for innovative and technological development of the Kabardino-Balkar Republic;

increasing competitiveness and capitalization of organizations,

operating in the territory of the Republic;

development of mechanisms

intellectual activity and management of rights to the results of intellectual activity and means of individualization;

Results

creation of conditions for the development of invention and innovation. In order to implement these tasks, it should be ensured: the definition of authorized executive bodies

the authorities of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, responsible for the development of the sphere of intellectual activity and the management of rights to the results of intellectual activity;

development

regulating legal relations in the field of intellectual property in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

Regulatory

Legal

Bases,

management of intellectual property rights,

belonging to the Republic;

Training in Intellectual Property and Development

competences in the field of intellectual property;

measures

Support

Innovation

Entrepreneurship,

inventions and innovations in the republic;

support of the activities of scientific and educational organizations in the field of intellectual property in matters of legal protection, protection for the results of intellectual management and legal activities;

Popularization

Activities

the University of London

Sphere

Intellectual Property

property.

2.5. The main directions of environmental management and environmental safety

The Kabardino-Balkarian Republic devotes considerable attention to the strategic objectives of state policy on environmental development: ensuring a favourable environment and comfortable living conditions for the population by reducing adverse effects on ambient air, creating an effective system for managing municipal solid waste, including the one hundred per cent (complete) elimination of accumulated environmental damage, and preserving biodiversity.

One of the main characteristics that determine the environmental safety and attractiveness of the region is the state of atmospheric air.

In Kabardino-Balkarian Republic 312 objects 1 and 2 categories of pollutants which have 2180 sources of pollutants into the air.

In the air pool is thrown 16 353 Tons of pollutants

The latter dominates, contributing up to 66,4 % to the mass emissions of all types of pollution sources.

Nalchik city

In 2023, the activities of the main industrial (hydrometallurgical production) enterprise of the atmospheric air pollutant OJSC Hydrometallurg were suspended, which allowed to significantly reduce emissions, improve the state of atmospheric air and the quality of life of people in the urban district.

A Regional Monitoring Network should be established to provide analysis of ambient air conditions in an ever-evolving industry and transport environment. According to the Federal State Budgetary Institution "Main Geophysical Observatory", according to the results of a study of atmospheric air in the CBD, the need for the opening of 13 points, stationary and mobile analytical points was revealed.

Water supply of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is carried out at the expense of underground and surface sources. At the same time, underground water supplies account for about 70 % of the total volume of water supplied to distribution systems. Despite the large number of existing water intakes, the republic is experiencing a water shortage, which is associated with an increase in the number of water consumers.

Projected resources of drinking and technical groundwater

They are about 5 million m3/day, stocks - more 1 million m3/day, estimated

on 98 deposits and subsoil plots. There are 21 stations located at 18 observation posts and 9 wells of the local observation network.

The current water system of the Republic includes: 13 Sewerage Treatment Facilities 240,0 thousand.m3/day., 760,24 km of sewerage networks, 22 Pumping Stations.

Water quality is negatively affected by the discharges from polluted areas of settlements located in the

near water protection zones.

An observation network for the quality of surface waters of the basin r. Terek, which includes 6 observation points, which are located on 6 of the largest rivers of the republic.

Po

Monitoring results

The number of wild animals, the book of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, recorded positive dynamics in terms of growth in the number of protected animals.

the Red River

In the republic, 7 hunting users operate: FGBU "Nalchikskoe GOOH", OOO OVOH "Geduko", LLC "Uroshchishche"

Ekipzoko, OOO OVOH "Harakhora", Kolkhoz named after Petrov,

LLC OFH "In-Tour", LLC "Ushtulu". Area of hunting grounds

is 870,177 thousand hectares, of which 294,300 (33,82 %) are fixed

and public - 575,877 (66,18 %). For the reproduction of hunting species of animals, hunting farms are engaged in their maintenance and breeding in semi-free conditions and artificially created habitat.

The total area of the forest fund is 194,7 thousand hectares, of which covered

forest - 171,9 thousand hectares. The forest cover of the Republic is 15,4%.

The strategic goal in the field of forestry of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is the effective use of protection, protection and reproduction of forests.

In order to preserve the unique natural complexes, typical and reference landscapes, rare and endangered species of plants and animals in the republic there are 27 specially protected natural areas, including 7 state nature reserves (148900 hectares) and 20 natural monuments (3061,63 hectares).

Total

Square

Specially

Protected

Natural

Territories

of regional importance has 152031,63 hectares.

The priority is to reduce the negative impact on the environment and eliminate environmental damage resulting from past economic activities.

in the territory of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic. In accordance with the National Waste Register approved by the

The Government of the Republic, currently

There are 70 temporary waste disposal facilities (unauthorized landfills). The total area of unauthorized landfills is 184,5 hectares.

In the framework of the federal project "Clean country" of the national project "Ecology" in the period from 2018-2022 years work was carried out on the liquidation of objects of accumulated environmental damage 6 objects.

REDUCED

Socio-environmental consequences,

The reclamation of the dry beach of the TBMK tailings pond has reduced the negative impact on the environment and air pollution caused by the negative impact of the disturbed lands and the economic damage caused by the disturbed lands to the environment. The event improved the quality of life of the population of 39,241 thousand people. The area of reclaimed areas that were exposed to negative environmental impacts was 6.1 hectares.

Since 2019, a new system for the treatment of TCW has been introduced - service provision

Only regional operators.

On

Today, 100% people are covered by the regional operator. 3754 container sites were created, on which

7611 containers. There are 4 garbage sorting facilities in the republic.

lines and 2 polygons.

In the year 2023 a concession agreement was concluded between the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and a limited construction company

responsibility of the waste sorting complex with a capacity of more than 200 thousand tons per year

"Museum-sorting

the Plant

in the Urvan municipal district. The planned completion date is December 2025 years. The sorting section has a high degree of process automation.

The water complex of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic consists of water management systems for industrial purposes and protective structures against the negative effects of water. Important issues of the Republic that require urgent solution are: ensuring the emergency-free passage of floods; safe provision of shore protection facilities;

Kabardino - Balkar

existing

Operation

Complex

construction and reconstruction of shore protection facilities. Number

Kabardino - Balkar

Population

The Republic,

living in the territories affected by the negative effects of the waters, is 150,89 thousand people, the length of the coastline of water bodies within the boundaries of settlements is 744,33 km.

Within the framework of the federal project "Protection from the negative effects of water and ensuring the safety of hydraulic structures in the territory of the Russian Federation" over the past 5 years, from 2019 to 2023 years, measures have been taken on the ability of flood hazardous sections of water bodies with a total length of 15,432 km.

Increase in capacity

In order to form an ecological culture in society, to foster respect for nature, rational use of natural education through the dissemination of environmental knowledge about environmental safety, information about the state of the environment and the use of natural resources.

Implemented

environmental

resources

In preschool educational institutions, general educational institutions and educational institutions of additional education, organizational and legal forms, independently and profile, the basics of environmental knowledge are taught.

Them

from

C

V

Profile

Conform

Institutions providing vocational training, retraining and advanced training of specialists are provided with the teaching of educational disciplines on environmental protection, environmental safety and environmental management.

Educational

the University of London

Objectives

Policy

Main

Environmental management and ecology in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic are the preservation of natural systems, maintaining their integrity and life-supporting functions for the sustainable development of society, increasing the demographic situation, ensuring environmental safety of the republic.

quality of life,

improvements

Population

Health

Regions

To do this, it is necessary: ensuring a favorable state of the environment; preservation and restoration of natural systems, their biological

diversity and ability to self-regulation;

Ensuring environmental management and equitable

access to natural resources for present and future generations of people.

To achieve the goals set in the implementation of the Strategy

The main objectives are:

development of the environmental monitoring system; reconstruction and

technical re-equipment of industrial use

Production

individual enterprises of resource-saving and environmentally friendly technologies;

and

C

construction and reconstruction of water supply and sanitation systems

human settlements;

construction and reconstruction of landfills for solid municipal and industrial waste and facilities for their processing and disposal;

construction and reconstruction of water facilities on water bodies, compliance with the regime of economic activity in water protection zones and coastal protective strips of water bodies;

carrying out complex land reclamation and reclamation,

forest restoration works;

development of normative, methodological and scientific support

implementation of environmental measures.

Priority in solving problems of protection of atmospheric

The following activities are to be carried out:

acquisition and implementation of an automated program of accounting for objects and sources of negative impact on the environment, through which payments for negative impact will be recorded, permits for environmental users to regulate emissions of pollutants into the atmosphere and waste generation limits;

Conducting regular sampling and analysis of samples for the content of pollutants in order to objectively assess the negative main effects of emissions on the environment and on the state of the surface air layer in the settlements of the republic.

Decision

Environmental and Water Management

problems

appropriate

implement in the following areas:

construction and water facilities;

reconstruction

Hydrotechnical and

Others

construction and reconstruction

flood protection

constructions;

Environmental management of water bodies. Activities are envisaged

repair of hydraulic structures on the rivers of the republic. Activities of this direction, in addition to the tasks of using water resources, solve the problem of hydraulic and other ensuring the reliability of water facilities.

Capital

Operation

the City Council

Protection of surface waters from pollution can be ensured by monitoring of water bodies, creation of water protection zones, treatment of wastewater (industrial, municipal, etc.), treatment and disinfection of surface and groundwater.

To address the following environmental management issues:

necessary

the City Council

waste areas:

implementation of a territorial scheme and program in the field of waste management for the purpose of organizing and carrying out activities for the collection, transportation, processing, disposal, neutralization, disposal of waste;

effective functioning

Regional

Operator

the City Council

waste management in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

construction and reconstruction of landfills and other facilities

Organized storage, disposal and disposal of waste;

creation of waste treatment facilities with the production of products; and construction,

reconstruction

technical re-equipment using

C

enterprises of resource-saving and environmentally friendly technologies;

Industry

Republic

construction and reconstruction of plants and systems of treatment plants at enterprises with the use of effective methods of purification, reagents and equipment.

Main results of the implementation of placement and

Waste management:

calculation of the balance of quantitative characteristics of formation, processing, disposal, neutralization, disposal of production and consumption waste;

Waste management will reduce the number of disposals

waste, will minimize disposal;

Expansion of the number of reception points from the population of different types

waste suitable for recycling;

Increase in the number of landfills for disposal and burial

waste;

Creation of solid waste processing facilities; gradual formation of ecological culture of the population and economic stimulation of separate collection of municipal solid waste will reduce their volume entering the landfill and reduce the area of land used for this.

Activities ensuring the protection of land and forest resources,

will be implemented in the following areas:

carrying out reclamation, anti-erosion works; reclamation of disturbed during production activities

Lands;

reforestation works; expansion of areas of specially protected natural areas

Republics.

Achievment

Strategic Objectives

In the field of environmental management and ecology, the implementation of regional projects "Clean country", "Preservation of unique water bodies", "Conservation of forests", "Clean water" and "Formation of an integrated system for solid municipal waste management" of the national project "Ecology" at the initial stage contributes.

Implementation of the planned activities will achieve the target of 2040

the following results:

Shorten

Emissions

Contaminants

substances

the University of London

the Atmosphere

stationary sources, including particulate emissions;

develop air pollution monitoring systems to account for

development of territorial planning schemes;

transition to the use of electric types of engines; increase

Automotive

quantity

Gas Filling

compressor stations;

rational use of groundwater; improvement of the ecological condition of water quality in surface waters

water bodies of the republic;

Improving environmental conditions near the Terek River

more than 42 thousand residents of May and Tersky municipal districts;

Increase in the number of protected animals listed in the Red Book

Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

ensure full restoration and forestation of the area

Deforestation and loss of life; and

form

for reforestation in all areas of felled and dead forest plantations;

support

Forest

Seeds

Stock

maintaining a healthy environment for people and creating conditions for

development of regulated tourism and recreation;

conservation and reproduction of natural resources in natural conditions, including rare and endangered species of wildlife listed in the Red Books of the Russian Federation and the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic;

Reducing the negative impact on the environment by

Reducing the amount of waste sent to landfill.

The implementation of national and regional plans of adaptation to climate change, reflecting a comprehensive assessment of the risks and opportunities arising from climate change and adaptation, a system of directions and specific measures supported by the necessary resources, plays a key role in addressing the problem of adaptation to global climate change and their negative impact on economic sectors and the quality of life of people.

the Order of the Government of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic 292-rp from 24 June 2022 approved a regional plan for adaptation to climate change in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, containing adaptation measures in agriculture, environmental management, transport, construction, industrial complex and trade, in the field of ensuring sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, civil defense and emergency situations.

A systematic approach to the implementation of national and regional plans will contribute to the development of the adaptation process in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.

2.6. Main directions of spatial development

A balanced territorial development will allow to form in each municipality of the priority development zone, which will act as engines of growth not only for these areas, but also for the republic as a whole:

Zolsky, Baksan, Chegemsky, Prokhladnensky, Tersky, Leskensky, Urvansky municipal districts and the city district of Baksan - the development of the agro-industrial complex using technologies for deep processing of raw materials and obtaining final products;

Elbrussky, Zola, Chegemsky, Chereksky municipal districts - the creation and operation of a special economic zone of tourist and recreational type;

Chegemsky, Elbrussky municipal

areas

-

development

construction materials industry;

Urvansky, Elbrus municipal districts - construction

small hydroelectric power stations.

Of particular importance is the development of the urban district of Nalchik as an administrative, financial and service center. This development will present the Nalchik urban district as:

A major economic center that concentrates on management

functions, coordinating commodity and transport flows; balneological resort of federal significance; interregional business center (financial and industrial sphere,

congress and exhibition and fair activities);

innovative

Center

(Education,

science,

institutions

commercialization of scientific research).

2.6.1. Development of the transport system

The development of the transport system is of great importance for the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic. Transport, along with other sectors of the economy, provides the basic conditions for the life of society, being an important tool for achieving social and economic goals.

Main directions of development

the Transport Complex

The republics are:

in terms of road transport: ensuring road safety; improving the level of safety on public transport; updating the fleet of rolling stock; improving the quality of transport services for passengers; forming the market for public transport services; switching to vehicles operating on gas-powered vehicles

fuel;

improvement of public transport infrastructure;

Improving the legal and regulatory framework for development

public transport;

improvement of control and supervisory functions; improvement of the development of the road network; in the part of air transport: reconstruction of the Nalchik airport complex, including reconstruction of the runway, as well as the construction of a new airport complex with a capacity of 500 thousand passengers per year.

The implementation of measures aimed at the development of the transport system will create conditions for further increasing the efficiency and competitiveness of public transport enterprises, attracting investment in the development of the transport system and will provide incentives for the introduction of new technologies and the use of modern vehicles.

As a result of improved public infrastructure

Transport will be achieved by:

providing transport services to all districts of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and direct transport communication between settlements and the capital of the republic in accordance with the minimum social transport requirements;

renewal of the fleet of transport enterprises; reduction of loss-making traffic for transport enterprises for

the expense of reducing transport costs and operating costs;

Improving the quality of passenger transportation by reducing time

in the way, improving the comfort and safety of transportation;

Reducing the negative impact of public

environment.

the Transport Department

Priority goals and objectives of road development

The Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is:

increasing the volume of repair work on roads and ensuring the preservation of the existing network of highways of the republic by improving the methods of work production, applying new technologies and improving the road management system;

the principle of determining the annual amount of funds required for repair work should be based on the normative interrepair periods, depending on traffic intensity and types of road surfaces;

and a list of road reconstruction based on an assessment of the existing transport and operational condition and the level of load of the road network, determining the necessary level of forecasting of cargo and passenger traffic, traffic volumes and traffic intensity;

Automotive

Construction

Technical

objects

General

Roads

bringing the sections of the federal highway P-217 within the boundaries of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic to parameters providing for movement on 4 lanes;

separation of traffic flows of oncoming directions by barrier fences using innovative structures, taking into account transport and pedestrian accessibility for the local population;

Holding

inventory (production of technical passports) for regional roads of state registration of property rights to real estate;

Passports

Technical

and

development of road traffic management projects; improving the efficiency of organizations in the road traffic market

works;

Attracting investment from the federal budget and others

sources.

the City

In determining the volume of construction work in subsequent years with the transition, it is necessary to allocate funds in such a way as to ensure the commissioning of facilities as soon as possible, excluding the possibility of default.

Long term

Planning

Main projects: reconstruction of Nalchik airport with extension of the runway

strips up to 2950 m;

construction of a new airport complex; renewal and replacement of rolling stock; construction of the Nalchik Ring Road; development of the mountain route "Caucasian Trail" along 5 gorges; introduction of transport systems.

technology,

Digital

t.u.m.

the University of London

Intelligent

Expected results: increasing the competitiveness of public transport enterprises; improving the efficiency of public transport management; increasing passenger traffic;

Transported

passengers,

Quantity

growth

Decline

Quantity

Road Traffic Accidents

C

severe consequences;

organization of cargo and passenger transport services of the tourist complex "Prielbrusye", increase of tourist flow in Prielbrusye;

Improving the quality and safety of transport services

Population;

creation of comfortable arrival conditions for residents and guests of the republic

and departure from G. Nalchik;

reduction of transport costs of transport enterprises; ensuring protection of the population in the transport system; improvement of transport and operational condition and quality

maintenance of roads, which will lead to a decrease in the number of road accidents due to related road conditions, the comfort of vehicle movement;

ensuring the safety of the existing road network, safety and traffic conditions in accordance with the technical standards of roads;

improving the technical characteristics of roads, which, in turn, will increase the load on the axle of vehicles and, accordingly, the volume of cargo transportation;

Increasing road capacity and creating

comfortable conditions for road users;

transition to the normative terms of repair and overhaul of the road network, elimination of the main foci of road accidents;

Improving the efficiency of organizations operating in the market

road works;

creating a competitive environment in the road works market, including for

account for attracting small businesses;

reduction in the percentage of depreciation of fixed assets of enterprises of industry, equipment and

High-performance and

Technician

attraction of equipment;

increase in tax payments to budgets of all levels from road

contracting organizations by increasing the volume of road works.

2.6.2. Fuel and energy complex

and

Production

Electric

The development of centralized heat supply (CHP), including combined energy, heat implies a decrease in the number of CHPs and an increase in the number of CHPs at the expense of existing boiler plants in order to achieve the highest production of electrical energy based on consumers of thermal energy. In this regard, there is a need to build a mini-CHP with a capacity of 20 - 1000 kW on the basis of existing boiler houses by superstructure of steam and gas turbines. For

Two demographic indicators are the density of the rural population and the degree of concentration of the urban and rural population.

Efficiency of CT

are

Important

Evaluations

In addition to the concentration of the population, it is necessary to assess the size of the heat market, the efficiency of the plants used and the ratio between electric and thermal efficiency. The ideal installation for combined generation of electrical and thermal energy is CHP.

The increase in the production of cheap electricity on the existing thermal consumption is possible through the use of gas turbine technologies, which will allow the existing industrial and heating boiler to become consumers of heat and dispose of their exhaust

gases. The temperature of the exhaust gases of domestic installations of the NC brand is 450 - 530°C. Modernization and superstructure of industrial and heating boiler houses, as well as CHP with convertible gas turbine engines of low and medium power (1 - 30 MW) allow to obtain a fuel utilization factor 89% and more.

The high degree of readiness of gas turbine equipment allows to reduce the terms of construction and installation and commissioning work at the customer's sites to 2 - 3 months.

In the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic there are all possibilities for the construction of a mini-CHP: all villages are gasified, the density and concentration of the population is high.

Given transport security, the availability of developed social and other infrastructures in rural areas, the conditions for the development of central heating systems are very favorable.

The construction of a low-power CHP and the transfer of existing heating boilers to the CHP mode by installing gas or steam turbines on them, as well as a decrease in the temperature of the network water at the outlet of the subscriber (with the development of more advanced heating appliances or the installation of temperature valves) and at the entrance to the CHP heat exchanger (with the installation of a heat pump installation) will significantly reduce the consumption of natural gas by the region.

The most promising project in terms of increasing the degree of cogeneration in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic is the replacement of large thermal boilers with maximum thermal loads located in the areas of the city. Nalchik.

According to preliminary estimates, for the issuance of electrical power will require the construction of a distribution point RP-6 kV with 10 linear cells, laying about 1,2 km of high-voltage cable lines, installation and modernization of metering units.

organizations

from mini-CHP energy heat exchangers and pump

Selection

For

Additional equipment will be required.

One of the mechanisms for overcoming the impact of the phenomena of the financial and economic crisis is the transformation of the fuel and energy complex into a financially stable, economically effective, environmentally compliant complex equipped with advanced technologies - a reliable and effective element of infrastructure that ensures the satisfaction of economically justified needs of the economy and allows solving regional security problems.

V

within

relevant

It is planned to further develop the fuel and energy complex of the republic through modernization, development of rational renewable energy sources (RES) and alternative types of energy, which will reduce the costs of energy resources supplies, including in the budget sphere.

Energy

Strategic

Use

resources,

Currently, the vector of development for the republic is modernization through technological renewal and the introduction of modern methods of managing the state information system of the fuel and energy complex).

(including information)

Technology

The main directions of development of the fuel and energy complex are: transition to the path of innovative and energy-efficient development; change in the structure and scale of energy production; creation of an internal competitive market environment. The need for regular adaptation of the parameters of energy development of the republic is dictated by new trends and phenomena in the Russian fuel and energy sector. It is necessary to note a high growth in demand for energy resources (TER).

In order to reliably ensure the fuel and energy efficiency of the Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria and reduce their anthropogenic impact on the environment, it is necessary to solve the following tasks:

Increase

resources,

Task

1.

Development

Energy Savings

and

promotion

energy efficiency.

Energy and resource saving is one of the most important factors ensuring the efficiency of the economy as a whole. It is achieved through the implementation of energy saving measures, timely transition to new technical solutions, technological processes and optimization forms of using management, international experience and other measures. The introduction of energy-saving technologies not only reduces costs and increases the competitiveness of products, but also contributes to increasing the sustainability of the fuel and energy complex and improving the environmental situation, reducing the cost of introducing additional capacities, and also helps to remove barriers to economic development by reducing technological restrictions.

Elevated

products,

Quality

Problem 2. Improvement of production, transportation and

increasing the depth of processing of hydrocarbon raw materials.

The lack of technical re-equipment of hydrocarbon processing facilities leads to the impossibility of reaching the depth of oil refining, at which the produced oil products can be successfully sold on the market.

In terms of ensuring the production of petroleum products, product quality requirements are defined at the level of world standards, which forces manufacturers to significantly increase the depth of oil refining and stimulates them to reach a new quality level in fuel production. Problem 3. Development of renewable energy

Improving the environmental efficiency of energy sources

Renewable energy has an important role to play because

Diversification

context

V

The use allows to solve the problems of reducing the anthropogenic load on the environment and the negative impact on the climate, as well as reduce dependence on fossil fuels.

The low rate of energy development based on the use of large non-traditional hydroelectric power plants with an installed capacity of more than 25 MW and biomass thermal power plants is determined by the following factors:

are included

RES,

not

the University of London

non-competitiveness of non-conventional renewable energy projects in the existing market environment compared to fossil fuel-based projects;

Institutional barriers, lack of

support programs for the use of non-traditional types of renewable energy;

lack of infrastructure required to ensure accelerated energy development through the use of non-traditional renewable energy sources, including insufficient level and quality of scientific services, low level of technological development;

Absence

Regulatory and technical

methodological regulation, as well as engineering and software tools necessary for the design, construction and operation of generating facilities operating on the basis of renewable energy sources;

and

placing most of the resources of non-traditional renewable energy sources in hard-to-reach areas with difficult climatic conditions and low population density.

Given the current current situation in the energy markets and the level of technological development without state support, it is economically possible to use only a small part of the available RES resources, with the exception of water energy used by large hydropower facilities and biomass.

Problem 4. Promotion of innovative development of the fuel and energy complex. Supporting the development and implementation of competitive equipment and technologies, updating, upgrading and commissioning of new capacities, as well as R&D in the fuel and energy sector is considered as one of the most important tasks, the key areas of which are strengthening investment activity in terms of innovations.

The priority in the implementation of innovation policy is given to the conduct of research and development and implementation of energy-efficient technologies aimed at solving the priority problems of accelerated development of the fuel and energy complex and taking into account the priority directions of development of science, technology and technology and the list of critical technologies of the Russian Federation, approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 7 July 2011 № 899 About approval of priority directions of development of science, technology and technology in the Russian Federation and the list of critical technologies of the Russian Federation.

Innovative development of the fuel and energy sector is based on the latest achievements

and

Innovation

Improvements

R&D of the infrastructure to bring innovation to the end user, within a sustainable innovation system (ES-2030). The most important decision tools

tasks of modernization and perspective development of fuel and energy sectors and creation of innovative energy are technological platforms in the energy sector based on the principles of public-private partnership, and with the development of the program by state participation.

Innovation

Joint Stock Company

Societies

For

Promoting the innovative development of the fuel and energy sector requires adequate information and analytical support. Such support should be provided by the state information system of the fuel and energy complex. In addition to information and analytical support for solving the tasks of the Strategy of the fuel and energy information state complex is designed to provide information support for the implementation of the state energy policy and, in particular, to solve the tasks of public administration of the functioning and development of the fuel and energy complex, aimed at achieving the following goals:

system

balanced development of modern fuel and energy infrastructure,

reducing fuel costs in the economy;

improving the budget efficiency of the fuel and energy complex; increasing the availability of fuel and energy complex services for the population; improving the integrated safety and sustainability of the fuel and energy complex; ensuring measures in the field of environmental safety; improving investment

Climate and

development

Market

relationship.

Problem 5. Construction (creation)

gas filling infrastructure facilities - stationary automobile gas filling compressor stations (AGNSS).

Currently, in accordance with the increasing requirements for the environment and reliability of transport, as well as their compliance with international safety standards, gas-engine fuel is gaining great importance.

The transition to gas engine fuel has a number of advantages: environmental friendliness - gas is much less harmful when used for fuel. The use of transport, gas engine fuel will reduce carbon monoxide emissions by eight times, nitrogen oxide - twice, smoke falls nine times, and soot

Diesel

Gasoline

Than

or

It does not form at all. The combustible mixture burns completely, which

positively affects the state of the surrounding air;

economy - cost and consumption of gas engine fuel

significantly lower than traditional motor fuels. development

6. Implementation of activities

Task

Charging

infrastructure for electric vehicles.

Considering the environmental friendliness, as an advantage in the market, go to

Project materials · Full published text

Development of the Suleyman district of Dagestan

Source status: Project

Materials on the development of Suleyman-Stalsky District, Dagestan.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/razvitie-suleimanskogo-raiona-dagestane.html

Open on the site

Approved

the Decision of the Assembly of Deputies

the Municipal District

MUNICIPAL PROGRAM "FORMATION OF MODERN URBAN

WEDNESDAY IN THE MUNICIPAL AREA "SULAYMAN-STEEL REGION" OF THE REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN FOR 2019-2024 YEARS

c. Kasumkent 2020

P A S P O R T MUNICIPAL PROGRAM "FORMATION OF MODERN

URBAN ENVIRONMENT IN THE MUNICIPAL AREA "SULEIMAN-STEEL AREA" OF THE REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN FOR 2019-2024 YEARS

Name of the Program

Municipal program "Formation of modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" for 2019-2024 years (hereinafter - the Program)

Basis for the development of the Program

Responsible Executive Program Participants Program

Objective of the Programme

Self - Government

Modifications

Local Organization

Federal Law of 06.10.2003 № 131-FZ "On General Principles in the Russian Federation"; - Federal Law of 09 December 2018 № 415-FZ On the Federal Budget for 2019 Year and planning period 2020 and 2021 Draft Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation “On the Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation on 30 December 2017 № 1710"On approval of the rules for the provision and distribution of subsidies from the federal budget to the budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation programs of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and municipal programs for the formation of a modern urban environment"; - Minutes of the Presidium of the Council under the Head of the Republic of Dagestan on strategic development and project activities in the Republic of Dagestan from 13 December 2018 № 11/7-02 About approval of the passport of the regional project of the Government of the Russian Federation "Comfortable in the Republic of Dagestan".

State

Support

Urban

Wednesday

the City

- Minutes of the meeting of the Presidium of the Presidential Council for Strategic Development and

the Russian Federation on National Projects 3 December 2018 № 14.

Administration of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" of the Republic of Dagestan (hereinafter - the Administration) Administration; contracting organizations; enterprises, organizations, institutions (by agreement); residents of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district"; HOA, management companies Improving the quality of living in the territories of settlements with a population of more than 1000 people who are part of the settlements of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" Improving the comfort of rural areas of the district", municipal increase in the quality index of the urban environment in 30 percent, the reduction in the number of cities with adverse environment in accordance with this index, as well as the creation of a mechanism

"S Uleiman-S Talsky

District

Objectives of the Programme

Target indicators and indicators of the Programme

direct participation of citizens in the formation of a comfortable urban environment, increasing the proportion of citizens involved in solving issues of urban environment development to 30 percent.

the City Council

Levels

citizens,

Involvement

promotion

Improvements

Interested

- Improvement of the level of improvement of yard areas of apartment buildings and public areas of rural settlements of the municipal district "Suleiman-Stalsky district"; - municipal areas of general use in the territory of rural settlements of the municipal district "Suleiman-Stalsky district"; in organizations - the implementation of the rural areas of urban and rural settlements of the municipal district "Suleiman-Stalsky district" 1 Number of citizens who took part in solving issues of urban environment development at the age of 14 years, living in municipal which projects are implemented to create a comfortable urban environment; - Number of well-maintained public areas, in municipal programs of formation of included modern urban environment -7; - included in the modern urban environment;

Local areas in municipal programs of formation

Essence

the entities,

Number

Territory

Courtyards

the City

Duration of the Programme Budget allocations

2019 - 2024

Total funding in 2019-2024 All of these years, all of the sources 56663,838 thousands of rubles, of which: at the expense of the federal budget 49561,820 thousands of rubles; at the expense of the republican budget of the Republic of Dagestan - 500,624 thousand rubles; budget of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" - 6601,394 Thousands of rubles including 2020 year; total funds - 8 878, 658 Thousands of rubles, of which:

Expected accomplishments of the Programme

From the federal budget - 8371,305 thousand rubles; at the expense of the republican budget of RD - 84,559 thousands of rubles; at the expense of the budget of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" -422,794 thousand rubles..

Program

territories,

Toasted

(relevant)

Municipal

Realization in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" in 2019-2024 years of a set of priority measures for improvement will lead to: - approval of the formation of a modern urban environment by public discussions on the results of voting on the selection of public improvement as a priority; - involvement for the period 2019-2024 years more 30 percent of the total number of citizens of 14 years, living municipal projects are implemented to create a comfortable urban environment; - implementation of measures for the improvement of public, yard areas, provided by the municipal program for the formation of a modern urban environment; - the proportion of citizens who took part in solving issues of development of living municipal projects to create a comfortable urban environment, - 30 percentage; - the number of well-maintained public areas, in the municipal programs of formation of included modern urban environment -7;

age of the entities,

the entities,

Territory

Territory

Wednesday,

years,

the City

the City

from

14

and

creation

Mechanism

Modern

Modern

the Municipal Base for the Implementation of Measures

- normative legal improvement, corresponding to the creation of a comfortable living environment for citizens; - the formation of a system of competitive selection of projects for improvement, and involving popular citizens projects; urban - increasing the implementation of projects; - additional job growth;

Environment in the Territories

Quality

Best

Selection

I. Characteristics of the current state of the sphere of improvement in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district"

One of the main activities of local self-government bodies of settlements, in accordance with the requirements of Federal Law No 131-FZ General principles of local organization

self-government in the Russian Federation”, is the solution of issues of organization of improvement of the territory, the creation of a modern urban environment, as one of the components of the integrated development of the territory.

The stage,

Important

Development

the previous municipal program "Formation of modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" for 2019-2024 years (further analysis of the current state of improvement of settlement territories, identification of the most problematic places, determination of priority directions of development of settlement territories in order to create a modern urban environment convenient and comfortable for people to live in.

It is an objective

- The programme),

Suleyman-Stalsky municipal district is located on the low-lying foothills of the Republic of Dagestan and is one of the largest districts of Dagestan. The area of the territory is 666,3 km2, or 1,4 % from the total area of Dagestan. The municipal district is part of the "Derbent mountain economic zone" of the "Mountain Dagestan" territorial zone and borders: in the north - with Tabasaran district, in the north-west - Khiv district, in the east, south and south-east - Magaramkent district, in the west and south-west - Kurakh district.

The population of the district at 01.01.2017, according to Dagestan, is - 56,7 thousand people, or 1,86 % of the total population of the republic.

The entire population is rural. Population density - 86,1 people/km2 (in

average in the republic - 59,49 people / km2).

On the territory of Suleyman-Stalsky municipal district 16 rural municipalities were formed - rural settlements, with a total number of rural settlements - 39.

Administrative center - Kasumkent village, population

14,5 thousand people.

Distance to the capital city. Makhachkala 187 km to the nearest city Derbent - 60 km to the railway station Beliji - 35 Kilomile.

The total area of the housing stock is 1173,0 thousand sq. m., of which 17 apartment buildings - 6,9 thousand sq. m. The population of Suleyman-Stal district is provided with housing, per capita, is 20,7 sq. m of total area of housing stock.

The climate in the region is transitional from moderate to subtropical, moderately continental. V

Mountain

Parts

-

the University of London

half dry,

Administrative center of the district (Kasumkent village) average temperature -11 °C to +37 °C. By the nature of the air during the year varies from the relief of Suleyman-Stalsky district can be divided into three main parts - low-lying (4 %), foothills (80 %) and mountain (16 %). The villages of Eminhur, Darkush, Novaya Maka, G Yereikhanovskoye, Kasumkent, Karchag, Ekendil, Zizik, Nytyug, Alkadar, Sardarkent, Ashaga-Arag, Yuhari-Arag, Asalikent, Ashagakartas, Yuharikartas, Kakhtsug are located in the lowlands. The rest of the villages are considered mountainous.

The total length of public roads in the region

"Suleyman-Stalsky

District

The territory of the municipality is 890 km, of which:

Roads within rural areas

settlements - 608,4- km; roads,

connecting municipal districts - 207,6km.

Populated

Items

the University of London

Boundaries

The federal road "Caucasus" (Baku) passes through the territory of the district

Rostov).

The state of supply of electricity to the population of the region as a whole remains unsatisfactory. The technical losses of power supply from transformer stations to consumers are more than 20% (large length of power lines from TP, transmission of current through non-standard wires, losses on transformers).

Over the past decades, more than 40 new residential neighborhoods have been formed in connection with the development of rural settlements in the municipal district, in which it is necessary to create an appropriate electric grid infrastructure.

In the area fully gasified 24 settlements of 39, in

which live about 60 thousand people, which is - 61,5%.

The Kurakhchay, Chiragchay and Tsmur rivers flow through the territory of the district, which merging near the village of Kasumkent, form the Gulgerichay River. There are also several small lakes in the area.

Water sources in the municipal area are mainly springs. There are also artesian wells in rural settlements "Kasumkentsky", "Ashagastalsky", "Alkadarsky", "Kurkent village" and "Darkush-Kazmalyar village".

To improve the situation with the water supply of settlements of the municipal district from 2008, the construction of a group water pipeline "Sardarkent-Darkush-Kazmalyar" with a length of about 38,8 km, which will provide more than 60 thousand people with high-quality drinking water.

Collection and removal of municipal solid waste in the area

rural settlements specialized Suleyman-Stal organization MUP housing and communal services "Suleyman-Stalsky district". The main method of solid waste disposal is their placement at the landfill in the area of Kasumkent village.

In economic specialization, the district is one of the largest producers of agricultural products. The development of agriculture is one of the priorities of the region's economy. The area has always been famous for its gardens. Fertile land, favorable climatic conditions, many sources, abundance of sun are the main components of the success of the Suleyman-Stal district. At the lowland, cereals, fruits, vegetables, grapes are grown, in the foothills and mountain parts of the district, livestock is engaged. From exotic fruits in the area grow pomegranates, persimmons, figs and partially kiwi.

On the territory of the district you can find the flora of almost all climatic zones: alpine meadows of highlands and forest areas of the foothills. Moreover, the greatest proportion is the forests of such valuable breeds as oak, eastern beech, rake, ash, maple, linden. Among wild food plants, walnut forests occupy a special place with their valuable product - walnuts.

The richness of the local flora is evidenced by the fact that in the territory

There are about 2500 species of herbaceous plants in the area.

Favorable climatic conditions, irrigated lands, many sources of medicinal mineral waters, abundance of sun, unique landscapes, clean air, dissolved in itself the healing aroma of gardens and forests, abundance of fruits, vegetables, grapes, numerous monuments of history, architecture, material culture make Suleyman-Stal district, in fact, a natural health resort.

Within the framework of the implementation of the Program of economic and social development of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" for 2019-2024, measures are being taken to improve intra-rural streets, sidewalks, reconstruction of alleys and landscaping of public areas in settlements.

Get

Of the 39 settlements, 15 have a population of over 1000 people. The largest centers of social gravitation, in which all services should be socio-cultural, including the creation of comfortable living conditions for villagers on the basis of the implementation of complex projects for the improvement of territories, ensuring their operation and maintenance, in accordance with the rules of improvement approved in municipalities

development

Industry

They are - c. Kasumkent with population 13,232 Thousands of people, p. Orta - Stahl 2,836 Thousands of people, p. Ashaga - Stal 2,849 Thousands of people, p. Ashaga - Stal - Kazmalyar 2,978 Thousands of people, p. Gereykhanovskoe 3,490 thousands of people., 2- the second branch of the state farm - 1,265 Thousands of people, p. Nova Maka 3,706 Thousands of people, Eminhjur - 3,476 thousands of people, Darkush-Kazmalyar - 2,816 thousand people., Kurkent- 3,975 Thousands of people, net-1243 cel.

Other settlements belonging to rural privates will have a network of objects of daily demand and convenient connections with the nearby center of social gravitation.

The natural and climatic conditions of the Suleyman-Stal district, its geographical location and relief create favorable prerequisites for the work on the improvement of territories and the development of engineering infrastructure.

"Goodwill" - a set of measures aimed at creating favorable, healthy and cultural living and leisure conditions of the population in the territory of the municipality, including works on the construction and repair of improvement objects, small architectural forms, proper sanitary maintenance of territories, lighting, landscaping, urban environment, external advertising and information, creating the appearance of the settlement. V

Implementation of the priority project

"Formation

Objectives

"Comfortable Urban Environment" and the present municipal program:

The term “urban environment” applies to both urban and

rural settlements;

under the improvement of the territories of municipalities or under the municipalities means the improvement of the territories of settlements with a population of more than 1000 people. Orta-Stal, Ashaga-Stal, Ashaga-Stal-Kazmalyar, - Gereikhanovskoe, 2nd branch of the state farm, Nova Maka, Ispic, Yukhari-Stal, Darkush-Kazmalyar, Nytyug, Kurkent, Eminhur;

ss. Kasumkent,

improvement of public territories

- measures to improve the education of the relevant functional purpose (squares, embankments, streets, pedestrian zones, squares, parks, other territories);

Municipal

yard territory means the totality of territories adjacent to apartment buildings, with objects located on them intended for maintenance and operation of such houses, and elements of improvement of these territories, including (parking places), sidewalks and car parks.

Roads, including roads, to areas adjacent to apartment buildings;

The following abbreviations were used: priority project "Formation of a comfortable urban environment" of the main direction of strategic development of the Russian Federation "Housing and Urban Environment" - Priority Project;

About

Agreement

Grants

from the republican budget of the Republic of Dagestan to the budget of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" to support the municipal program "Formation of a modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" for 2019-2024 years - Agreement;

Grants

2019

the Year

the University of London

administration of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district"

Republic of Dagestan - Administration;

municipal program "Formation of modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" for 2019-2024 years - Program.

Requiring

Day-to-day

The problem of land improvement is one of the most effective urgent, complex measures aimed at solutions. It is necessary to take the restoration of the proper condition of common areas, yard areas of apartment buildings and passageways to the yard areas, on the condition of which the quality of life of the population largely depends.

Attention and

Time

Current

Courtyards

Status

and public most of the territories in the municipalities does not meet modern requirements for the places of residence of citizens, due to the norms of the Town-planning and Housing codes of the Russian Federation. Prior to the present territories, improvement was carried out on certain types of work, without the mutual connection of elements of improvement. Some types of improvement works were practically not carried out: work on the maintenance of green areas of courtyard areas, the organization of new courtyard sites for children of different age groups, the installation of parking lots for temporary storage of cars.

Courtyards

The current situation is due to a number of factors: the introduction of new modern requirements for the improvement and maintenance of yard areas, insufficient funding for events in previous years, the problems of creating and providing an environment that is comfortable and favorable for the population.

Integrated

absence

Decision

Approaches

C

At

absence

It is not possible to obtain a multifunctional adaptive environment for citizens.

Improvements

Project

When performing landscaping work, it is necessary to take into account the existing infrastructure of the territory for

opinion of residents and definition of functional areas and performance of other activities.

Complex improvement of the territories will allow to maintain them in a satisfactory condition, to increase the level of improvement, to create an environment, to ensure healthy conditions of rest and life of residents.

Architectural and landscape

Harmonious

Despite the positive trends in the development of landscaping and landscaping, it is necessary to note a number of existing problems: insufficient funding for the reconstruction of green spaces of ordinary plantings, the creation of park areas.

By the decisions of the Councils of Deputies of the settlements of Suleyman-Stalsky municipal district, in 2017, the updated Rules for the improvement of the territories of municipal formations of the Suleyman-Stalsky district were adopted, which established requirements for the complex improvement of microdistricts and courtyard territories of municipal formations for the long term.

improvement of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district"

The entities are represented by the following indicators:

present

Sphere

Sub-State

(provided

the number and area of landscaped yard areas in a coating that allows comfortable movement on the main pedestrian communications at any time of the year and in any weather, lighting, play equipment for children under five years of age and a set of necessary furniture, landscaping, equipped waste collection sites), (units / sq. m) - 0;

Hard

percentage of the total number of well-maintained yard areas

- Domestic territories, (%) - 0;

coverage of the population with landscaped yard areas (the proportion of the population living in the housing stock with landscaped yard areas of the population of municipalities), (%) - 0;

General

from

the number and area of sites specially equipped for recreation, communication and leisure activities by different groups of the population of municipalities (sports grounds, playgrounds,

dog walking areas and others), (unit / sq. m) - 50/25000;

the proportion of the population with convenient pedestrian access to sites specially equipped for recreation, communication and leisure, of the total population of municipalities. Convenient pedestrian access means the possibility for the user of the site to reach it on a paved and illuminated route for no more than five minutes, (%) - 10;

Number of public areas in municipalities

(parks, squares, embankments, etc.), (unit/sq.m) - 24/139200;

the share and area of well-maintained public areas (parks, squares, embankments, etc.) of the total number of such areas (% / sq. m) - 17/24000;

The percentage and area of public areas of the total number of such

territories in need of improvement, (%/sq. m) - 83/115200;

Area of well-maintained public areas

for 1 residents of the municipality (sq. m. / person) - 0,8;

the volume of financial participation of citizens, organizations in the implementation of measures for the improvement of courtyard territories, public territories in municipalities, (million rubles) - 0;

labor participation of citizens, organizations in the implementation of activities for -

improvement of yard areas, public areas, regularly held subbotniks for their cleaning and landscaping.

A unique opportunity to implement modern integrated approaches to the formation of a comfortable urban environment is provided by the implementation of this Program, developed within the framework of the priority project of the Russian Federation "Formation of a comfortable urban environment" of the strategic direction "Housing and Urban Environment".

Prior to approval and start of implementation of the project of the municipal program "Formation of modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" 2019-2024 years to be published for conducting in accordance with the established procedure of public discussions with the participation of the general public, in accordance with the municipal program "Formation of a modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" 2019-2024 years, approved by the decision of the administration of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" from 10 November 2017 № 292.

the Order of Public

discussions

Project

Implementation of the Program is carried out in two directions: - entities;

improvement

Territories

Courtyards

the Municipalities

- improvement of the most visited municipal territories (public territories) in municipal

common use of the entities.

This

Activities

It provides for the improvement of the most intensively used territories, residential areas, public areas, territories, functions of performing adapted (multifunctional areas), yard spaces and others.

Diverse

Program

For

Status

In order to organize the process of integrated improvement, according to the results of the inventory and assessment of the current improvement, carried out during a full-scale survey of the territories of settlements of Suleyman-Stalsky district with a population of more than 1000 people, the Administration conducts measures to prepare a passport for the improvement of territories, which will optimize both the process of care and maintenance of territories, and their further development (for example, design and construction of playgrounds, placement of recreation areas, allocation of additional places).

Inventory

Improvements

The passport of improvement of territories, prepared in accordance with the form approved by the order of the Ministry of Construction of the RD of 16.06.2017 No 112 "On the yard approval of the order of territories, public territories, territories of individual residential development and territories in the management of legal entities and individuals includes the boundaries and the total area of the territory, entrepreneurs", present and planned for placement of objects of improvement and their characteristics (including the general level of improvement - the state of their coverage).

etc.). Passport

Also

and

II. Policy priorities for improvement, formulation of objectives and setting of objectives of the Program

The modern citizen perceives the entire territory of the settlement as a single space and expects safety, comfort, functionality and aesthetics from it. Rationally built urban environment allows you to reduce the degree of social tension, on the illuminated streets below the level of crime, with the presence of safe and modern sports grounds, the proportion of the population increases,

Regularly playing sports, the level of morbidity decreases.

Priorities and objectives of state policy in the field of implementation

The programmes are defined as:

the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 7 May 2012 № 600 On measures to provide citizens of the Russian Federation with affordable and comfortable housing and to improve the quality of housing and communal services;

Passport of the Priority Project approved by the Presidium of the Presidential Council for Strategic Development and Priority Projects (Minutes No. 21 November 2016 of 10);

the RF Government Decree 09.02.2019 N 106 "Amendments to Annex N 15 to the state program of the Russian Federation and the Russian Federation with public services of citizens of the Russian Federation";

Comfortable accommodation

"Security

Affordable

and

Passport of the regional project "Comfortable urban environment in the Republic of Dagestan", approved by the Presidium of the Council under the Head of the Republic of Dagestan for strategic development and project activities in the Republic of Dagestan (minutes from 13 December 2018 No 11/7- 02)

1. In this regard, the priorities of the municipal district "Suleyman-

Steel district" in the field of improvement are:

Creating a safe, comfortable, environmentally friendly and attractive urban environment accessible to persons with disabilities and other people with limited mobility;

taking into account the needs and requests of residents and other urban entities

environment, their direct participation at all stages of the Program;

ensuring compliance of elements of urban environment in the territories

Municipalities with established criteria;

ensuring proper maintenance and repair of facilities and

elements of improvement of the territories of municipalities.

2. The purpose of the Program is to improve the quality of living in the territories of settlements with a population of more than 1000 people, which are part of the settlements of the Suleyman-Stalsky district.

3. In order to achieve this goal, the following must be achieved:

Tasks:

promotion

Levels

Improvements

Courtyards

Territories

multi-apartment houses of municipalities;

increase in the level of improvement of municipal territories of squares,

public use of municipal embankments, etc.);

(Parks,

involvement of interested citizens, organizations in the implementation of

measures for the improvement of the territories of municipalities;

Accessibility of the urban environment for low-mobility groups

Population.

III. The implementation of the Program, the control stages and the terms of their implementation The implementation of the Program is designed for one stage with 2019 by 2024 year. The plan for the implementation of the Program with the timing of the onset of control events is given in Appendix No 3.

IV. Indicators and indicators of the Program are adopted in conjunction with its goals and objectives and, taking into account the need to ensure the achievement of the priorities of the state policy of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" in the implementation of the Program.

Indicators and indicators are achieved by

implementation (implementation) of all activities of the Program.

List of indicators and indicators of the Program with decoding

The planned values for the years of its implementation are given in Appendix No. 1.

Number of Programme indicators

is formed on the basis of the principles of necessity and sufficiency to achieve the goals and solve the tasks.

System of indicators used

(Indicators) of the Program allows to clearly assess the progress in achieving all goals and objectives of the Program and cover the essential aspects of achieving the goal and achieving the task. Indicators (indicators) have quantitative values planned for the deadlines. The values of indicators (indicators) can be specified.

V. Total Programme Funding in 2019-2024 the Years

Resource information for the Programme

account of all sources is - 56663,838 thousand rubles, of which:

at the expense of the federal budget - 49561,820 thousand rubles; at the expense of the republican budget of the Republic of Dagestan

500,624 thousand rubles;

budget of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district"

-

6601,394 thousand rubles.

The cost of the program is also included

in Annex No. 2 to the Programme.

VI. Description of regulatory measures by local authorities

Self - Government

The responsible executive of the Program - the Administration, together with the participants of the Program, are responsible for the qualitative and timely implementation of activities, the effective use of allocated budget funds.

1. To ensure the implementation of the Program, the Administration, as

The responsible executor:

annually concludes with the responsible executor of the state program of the Republic of Dagestan "Formation of the modern urban environment in the Republic of Dagestan" for 2019-2024 - the Ministry of Construction, Economy of the Republic of Dagestan (Minstroy of Dagestan) an Agreement on the provision of a subsidy from the republican budget of the Republic of Dagestan to the budget of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky District" to support the Program (hereinafter - the Agreement);

Housing and Communal Services

Architecture

Annually

Agrees

with the Ministry of Construction of Dagestan, updated indicators of the effectiveness of the Program for the corresponding year and annually reports on the progress of their implementation;

implements the activities of the Program; provides the appointment

responsible person and placement of information in the module "Formation of a comfortable urban environment" of the state system of housing and communal services (GIS);

Information

ensures changes in the activities of the Program; provides reports and information on the progress of the Program. 2. Implementation of the Program activities

with risks that affect outcomes, including: budget risks associated with budget deficits and

Linked

the possibility of non-fulfillment of the Program’s activities;

social risks associated with low social activity of the population, lack of mass culture of complicity in the improvement of yard areas;

management (internal) risks associated with ineffective quality of the Program, management of interagency control over the implementation of the Program, insufficiently high level of quality of improvement projects, etc.

Interactions, insufficient

Realization

Low

To prevent risks, reduce the likelihood of adverse consequences and ensure the continuity of the implementation of activities, the following opportunities:

Programs Administration

following

Executes

implementation on the territory of the municipality of the requirement of mandatory fixation for owners, legal owners (users) of the obligation to maintain the adjacent territory;

availability of the formed consumer request for accommodation in the

comfortable and safe urban environment, "feedback" system;

carrying out information and outreach work in the media in order to stimulate the participation of citizens and business in the implementation of improvement projects;

Training

Holding

their subsequent participation in the implementation of projects will create modern competencies in creating a comfortable urban environment and implement improvement projects taking into account modern requirements;

the Administration

and

formation of a clear schedule for the implementation of the Agreement with the most specific activities, terms of their implementation and responsible persons;

creation of a system for monitoring and monitoring online the implementation of the Agreement, which allows to quickly identify deviations from the approved schedule and eliminate them.

VII. List of programme activities and programme implementation mechanism

Major activities of the Programme

formed on the basis of the need for a comprehensive solution of the tasks set and the achievement of goals aimed at increasing the level of improvement of the territories of municipalities, indicating the targets and the timing of their implementation.

1. The following main tasks are planned to be carried out

Events:

improvement of yard areas of apartment buildings in

Municipalities; improvement

Public

Entities;

Territories

the Municipalities

implementation of complex projects for the improvement of territories in

Municipalities;

Holding

physical, spatial, informational accessibility of the urban environment for various population groups, including the creation of a barrier-free environment for

Support

Events

the City Council

People with limited mobility in the public areas of municipalities.

In addition, the formalization of indicators (indicators) of the Program and the establishment of their values are performed taking into account their relationship with the indicators of the Rules for the provision of federal subsidies, the Rules for the provision of republican subsidies, the passport of the Priority Project, the documents of strategic planning of the federal and republican in the names of indicators of different levels and the methodology for their calculation.

Continuity

Security

Levels

C

2. When forming the Program, the Administration carried out the following activities (including in preparation for the formation of the Program):

Analysis of the state of territorial development of municipalities

entities, including determining the prospects for their development;

appropriate lists are formed and priorities are defined

development taking into account the information received;

analysis

Current

the University

Status

territories of municipal entities: an inventory was carried out and documents were compiled (including in electronic form) describing all improvement objects located in the territories of municipal status, formations, typology of these objects, as well as the ownership structure of land resources and improvement objects (by type of property), the described improvement objects were mapped;

Technical

Them

Describes the existing problems based on the

analysis, formulated proposals for their solution;

expert analysis of the received materials, including with the involvement of the relevant municipalities, and developed proposals for measures for inclusion in the Program based on their results;

Address

Territories

Formed

All Courtyards

list of apartment buildings in need of improvement and subject to improvement during the implementation of the Program based on the minimum list of works on improvement, following the results of the inventory and public discussion of the draft Program. The order of improvement is determined in the order of receipt of proposals of interested persons on their participation in the performance of these works. Interested persons include representatives of authorities, local self-government, business, public associations, individuals interested in the improvement project and ready to participate in its implementation;

Formed

territories address list (Appendix No. 5) in need of improvement during the implementation of the Program, following the results of the inventory and public discussion of the draft Program;

All Improvements

Public

and

an address list of municipalities to be created (restored, water supply centralized reconstruction) based on the results of public discussion of the draft Program was formed;

Drinking Water

objects

an address list of real estate objects (including unfinished construction objects) and land plots owned (used) by legal entities and individual entrepreneurs subject to improvement no later than 2024 years at the expense of these persons in accordance with the agreements concluded with the Administration, based on the results of the inventory and public discussion of the draft Program.

3. In light of the public debate held in

Special importance of the territories (open

public spaces that meet at least two - centrality of location, historical and cultural and / or criteria (demand) for significance, high popularity of the natural population) for the purpose of improvement the following objects located in the territories of municipalities were selected:

4. Measures for inventory of the level of improvement of real estate and land plots provided for their placement were carried out in accordance with the Procedure for the inventory of territories, territories, improvement of territories of individual residential development and territories under the jurisdiction of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs, approved by the order of the Ministry of Construction of Dagestan from 16 June 2017 № 112. inventory of the territory in the prescribed form.

the Passport

Public

Courtyards

results

Po

5. Activities for the improvement of the territories within the framework of the Program are carried out taking into account the availability for people with limited mobility. By the resolution of the Head of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" of 28.12.2015 of 74, the Plan ("road map") "Increasing the values of indicators of accessibility measures for persons with disabilities of objects and services in the established areas of activity (2016-2020 years)" (hereinafter - "road map") was approved.

The Roadmap is designed to provide an integrated approach to the implementation of measures to increase the value of accessibility indicators: health.

According to the road

Barriers are being implemented in the district, preventing accessibility for disabled and disabled groups of the population of social infrastructure facilities, expanding the range of

Retained

Deletion

map"

measures

the City Council

Social services provided. p.

Conducted

Work

Equipment

institutions of health care, education, social protection of the population, physical culture and sports, culture and art, as well as transport infrastructure of disabled people and devices that remove barriers to the passage of other groups of the population, ensuring their access to the information space.

Low Mobility

(adaptations)

Further implementation of these measures in municipalities is also carried out within the framework of this Program, in accordance with the approved design projects for the improvement of courtyard areas and public areas, which necessarily take into account measures to ensure the physical, spatial, information accessibility of the urban environment for people with disabilities and people with limited mobility.

6. The minimum list of works on improvement of yard territories, adopted in accordance with the list of established Rules for the provision and distribution of subsidies from the federal budget to the budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation for support of state programs of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and municipal programs for the formation of the modern urban environment, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation 09.02.2019 N 106 "Amendments to Annex N 15 to the state program of the Russian Federation "Ensuring affordable and comfortable housing and public services of citizens of the Russian Federation", appendix (Annex No6) a visualised list of examples of improvement elements proposed for placement on the yard territory and by the Government of the Republic of Dagestan 10 April 2019 76a "Formation of modern urban environment in the Republic of Dagestan" 2019-2024 years.:

- providing lighting for yard areas; - installation of benches; - installation of garbage bins; - installation of ramps; - equipment for children; - installation of gazebos

7. Additional list of works on improvement of yard territories, in accordance with the list established by the subprogram "Formation of modern urban environment in the Republic of Dagestan" 2017 the year approved by the Government of the Republic of Dagestan 10 April 2019 76a "Formation of modern urban environment in the Republic of Dagestan" 2019-2024 years.:

- the device of sports grounds; - the equipment of car parks; - the importation of soil, landscaping;

- decorative fencing; - container platforms; - tree crowning.

8. Normative cost (single prices) of works on improvement of yard territories included in the minimum and additional lists of works are determined on the basis of estimated standards and are:

Nr. p/p

Name of work

Unit of measurement

Unit cost in prices 2000 (without VAT)

Minimum list of improvements

1 units

9064,0

1

2 3 4 5 6

7

8 9

10

11

12

Lighting of public areas with installation of supports and cable laying Installation of benches Installation of garbage bins Children's playground Installation of gazebos Device of ramps

1 bench 1 urn 1 playground 1pcs.

1m2

Additional list of improvement works

Car parking equipment Sports ground Decorative fencing device Container sites Soil supply, landscaping

Tree crowning

1m2

1 Playground 1p/m

1m2

1m2

1der.

1708,0 636,0 12085,0 60850 6500

428,0

77904,0 1919

190,0

190,0

150

If there is a decision of the owners of the premises of an apartment building, the yard area of which is landscaped, on the adoption of the composition of the common property of an apartment building created as a result of the improvement of property.

such

cost

Implementation

When co-financing by the owners of the premises of an apartment building of works on improvement of yard territories, the amount is not less than 20 percent condition included applies to yard municipal programs of formation of modern urban environment, included this program municipal programs after the entry into force of the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation from 9 February 2019 106 "On Amendments to the Annex 15 the state program of the Russian Federation "Providing affordable comfortable housing with public services of citizens of the Russian Federation".

The territory has not previously

works. Dane

9. To achieve the Programme’s objectives, the following main measures are planned, including at municipal level: — prepare and submit to Russia’s Ministry of Construction the parameters for compiling the urban environment quality index for the urban districts of the Republic of Dagestan (relative to the previous year), in accordance with the methodology for compiling that index; — survey the level of improvement of individual residential houses and the land plots allocated for them, and, following the survey, conclude improvement agreements with the owners (users) of those houses and land plots, no later than… in accordance… the latter… requirements of the improvement rules;

Federally Approved Municipalities

Education

Project

Year

- carrying out work on the formation of land plots on which apartment buildings are located, the improvement of the yard areas of which is carried out using a subsidy from the republican budget;

- conclusion of agreements on the results of the purchase of goods, services to ensure municipal needs for the implementation of municipal programs no later than 1 July year of granting a subsidy - for concluding agreements for the performance of works on the improvement of public territories, no later than 1 May year of granting a subsidy - for the conclusion of agreements for the accomplishment of works on the improvement of yard areas, and except for cases of appealing the description of the actions (inaction) of the customer (or) of the commission for the implementation of purchases (or) of the operator of the electronic platform in the procurement of goods, works, services according to the procedure established by the legislation of the Russian Federation, in which the term for concluding such agreements is extended for the period of appeal

relevant

Municipal

included

program,

-

Conclusion

Historic

Subsidiaries

the Municipal Agreements

competition of the best projects for creating a comfortable urban environment for small settlements; cities with the winners of the All-Russian competition for the best projects for creating a comfortable urban environment for small towns of historical settlements in order to provide them with federal support in the form of other intergovernmental winning projects; implementation of transfers - updating the "Electronic Budget" system of the agreement between the heads of the Federal Project (Program) for the implementation of the regional project (Program); updating the agreement "Electronic Grant from the Federal Budget of the Republic; Dagestan - updating agreements with municipalities for the purposes of

Republican

Realization

Support

Budget

The Budget"

System

For

Subsidies by recipients of co-financing of municipal programs;

the City

of

Best

Competition

- implementation of projects by municipalities - winners of projects; - submission no later than 1 December the current fiscal year of the Ministry of Construction of Russia for a competition for the selection of best practices (projects) for the improvement of at least two projects implemented this year on the territories; improvement of public ones - increasing the level of digitalization, improving the quality of urban management in specific cities of the Republic of Dagestan within the framework of the implementation of the activities provided for by the passport of the departmental project. (The list of the main activities of the Program is indicated in Appendix No 1.)

VIII. Projections of expected programme results

1.

As a result of the updated rules,

According to the federal guidelines and the implementation of the Program, adopted taking into account the opinion of the population, territorial public self-government of Suleyman-Stalsky district, a mechanism for the implementation of improvement measures will be created that meets modern requirements for creating a comfortable living environment for citizens and involves large-scale involvement of citizens in the implementation of these measures, which will increase the volume of measures implemented and really improve the quality of the living environment in municipalities.

all

A model for the implementation of improvement projects will be built, a regional one linking the municipal authorities and the residents themselves and creating a clear model of the movement in the implementation of the project with pre-defined rules for the selection and support of projects.

(Federally,

Levels

2. The created system of assessment of quality of the urban environment will allow to conduct on a permanent and systematic basis assessment of municipalities, with the involvement of citizens themselves in this work, to attract the attention of authorities and the public to the solution of one of its key problems of the modern state of the urban environment of aggressiveness and not comfort for a person.

3. Implementation of the complex in the territories of municipal entities Suleyman

In the 2019-2024 priority improvement measures of the Stal municipal district will also lead to:

creation of a mechanism and a modern municipal regulatory legal framework for the implementation of improvement measures that meet modern requirements for creating a comfortable living environment for citizens;

Formation

improvement, involving the selection of the best and popular projects;

Competition

projects

System

Selection

improving the quality of the urban environment in the territories of implementation

projects;

Additional job growth. At the same time, the republican subsidy provided will help in the implementation of landmark municipal improvement projects, which in turn will allow to involve citizens and business directly into the implementation of improvement projects, including by encouraging citizens or business to initiate projects. This creates a cross-cutting (“top-down” and “bottom-up”) system of involvement in the process of improving a particular territory and synchronizing the actions of government, citizens and business.

IX.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Program will be carried out using indicators of the Program, monitoring the degree of achievement of target values of which will allow to analyze the progress of the program to develop the right management decision.

The methodology for assessing the effectiveness of the Program is an algorithm for assessing the process (by years of the Program implementation) based on the results of the Program implementation, the Program effectiveness based on the assessment of the compliance of the current values of indicators with their target values.

Evaluation of the effectiveness (results) of the use of the subsidy from the republican budget is carried out by comparing the values of performance indicators from (results) of the republican budget established by the agreement on the provision of the subsidy from the federal budget of the Republic of Dagestan to support the Program with their achieved values.

Use

Grants

X.

Involvement of citizens, organizations in the process of discussion and implementation of the Program

1.

Participation of citizens, organizations in the process of discussion and implementation

The program is carried out in accordance with the target model for the organization of public participation, as well as the involvement of business and citizens in the implementation of urban environment improvement projects developed by the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation, and with the Procedure for the submission, consideration and evaluation of proposals of interested parties, the Procedure for conducting public discussion by the decision of the administration of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" from 10 November 2017 №292 in the following forms:

The draft program,

Approved

- joint definition of goals and objectives for the development of yard and public areas, inventory of problems and potentials of these territories (with regard to yard areas, the limits of inventory and joint decision-making are limited to the corresponding yard areas);

-

participation of public areas, priority for improvement;

Organization of wide

Public

the University of London

Selection

- discussion and choice of equipment type, non-capital objects, small architectural forms, including definition of their functional purpose, corresponding dimensions, style solution, materials, types of coatings, landscaping, lighting and lighting equipment of the yard and public area;

-

coordination of project solutions

with participants in the design process and future users, including local residents, entrepreneurs, and other stakeholders;

Territories and

Owners

Neighbours

- implementation of public (control of owners of premises in multi-apartment buildings - in relation to yard areas) control over the process of implementing the project for the improvement of the municipal territory of public use and their further operation (including as an opportunity for control by any interested group, public council of the project, or supervisory board of the project);

and formation.

Work

The parties,

2. In the implementation of projects for the improvement of yard and public areas, citizens and organizations are informed about the planned changes and the possibility of participation in this process by:

- creation of a single information Internet resource (site or application) that will solve the tasks of collecting information, ensuring "online" participation and regular information about the progress of the project, with the publication of photos, videos and text reports on the results of public discussions;

- working with local media covering a wide range of people

different age groups and potential audience of the project;

- posting posters and announcements on information boards in the entrances of residential buildings located in the immediate vicinity of the designed object, as well as on special stands at the object itself, in places of attraction and crowds of people' (public and shopping - entertainment centers, iconic places and sites), in the halls of significant and social infrastructure facilities located in the neighborhood of the designed territory, sports halls. Stands can work both to collect questionnaires, information and feedback, and as platforms for the publication of all stages of the design process and reports on the results of public discussions.

- organization of reception of proposals for improvement of yard areas in various formats (by e-mail, on purpose (by organizing a special point for reception of proposals on the territory of the authorized body).

3. Financial participation

in the implementation of the minimum and additional lists of works on the territories in the framework of improvement of yard and public programs, is not provided.

the interested parties,

Organizations

In the implementation of improvement projects under the Program, how

Organizations

Labor

citizens,

Participation

is provided

with regard to additional and minimum lists of improvement works.

Participation of citizens, organizations in labor (non-monetary) form

expressed in: - performance by residents of unpaid work that does not require special

qualifications, such as:

- preparation of the object (yard territory) for the beginning of work (land works, removal of old equipment, garbage collection) and other works (painting of equipment, landscaping, planting trees, protection of the object);

- provision of building materials, machinery, etc.;

- ensuring favorable conditions for the work of the contractor

organization that performs work and for its employees.

Documents (materials) confirming labor participation are the report of the contractor on the performance of work, including information on the event with the labor participation of citizens, the report of the council of an apartment building, the person who manages an apartment building on the event with the labor participation of citizens. At the same time, photo, video materials confirming the event with the labor participation of citizens with their placement in the media, social networks, the information and telecommunication network Internet (hereinafter - the Internet) are presented.

Annexes

Soo

Report

C

The administration also, if possible, ensures the involvement of student construction teams in the improvement of yard areas.

XI. Peculiarities of monitoring the implementation of the Program within the Priority Project

Coordination and monitoring of the implementation of the Program, including the implementation of specific activities under the Program, the organization of public discussions of the project of the Program, the assessment of interested persons for inclusion in the Program, proposals is carried out by those interested in the implementation of the municipal program "Formation of a modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" on the 2018-2022 years, formed by the decision of the administration of the municipal district (hereinafter - "Suleyman-Stalsky district" from 21 November 2017 №292

the Implementation Commission

public persons,

the Control Committee

Evaluation

the National Park

Public Commission).

the Urban Environment 2019-2024

The public commission, in accordance with the Methodological recommendations for the preparation of state programs of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and municipal programs for the formation of years, approved by the modern order of the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation from 6 April 2017 No. 691 /pr, includes representatives of local governments of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district", local branches of political parties, public organizations operating in the territory of the Suleyman-Stalsky district.

The organization of the activities of the public commission is carried out in accordance with the Regulations on the public commission approved in accordance with the standard form approved by the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation.

At the same time

Holding

Public commissions are carried out in an open form using video recording from records, protocols of subsequent meetings in open access on the website of the Administration on the Internet.

relevant

Smog

Meetings

Annex No. 1 to the municipal program "Formation of a modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" for 2019-2024 years

KEY EVENTS AND INDICATORS (INDICATORS) OF THE MUNICIPAL PROGRAM "FORMATION OF THE MODERN URBAN ENVIRONMENT IN THE MUNICIPAL AREA "SULEIMAN-STEAL REGION" FOR 2019-2024 YEARS

Main activities

Namenani

е

Indicators

Ed. izm.

Values by year

2019

2020 2021

2022

2023

2024

(Indicator)

increase in the number of landscaped yard areas of apartment buildings increase in the number of landscaped public areas;

Improvement of yard areas of Kasumkent apartment buildings

the University of London

c.

Blag2 arrangement of public territories in ss. Orta-Stal, New Ispic, Maka, Ashaga-Stal, Ashaga-Stal

-

d.

0

0

0

0

0

d.

29% 38% 46% 50% 54% 58%

increase in the share of the area of well-maintained public areas, which are for 1 inhabitants

d.

43% 50% 10% 80% 40% 20%

42% 22% 18% 8%

8% 7%

00

00

00

00

00

from quantity

Executed

share of complex projects for the improvement of the overall implemented improvement projects, the share of yard and public areas, landscaped taking into account the availability of people with limited mobility

with them for

Kazmalyar, Gereikhanovskoye, 2 - state farm department. e Gereikhanov, village Yukhari-Stal, Eminkhur, Darkush-Kazmalyar (hereinafter - municipalities) Implementation of complex projects for the improvement of the territories of municipalities

the University of London

the City Council

Carrying out measures to ensure physical, spatial, information accessibility of the urban environment for various groups of the population, including the creation of a barrier-free environment for people with limited mobility of public spaces of municipalities

Zone

For

the University of London

Annex No. 2 to the municipal program "Formation of a modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" for 2019-2024 years

RESOURCE PROVIDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MUNICIPAL PROGRAM "FORMATION OF THE MODERN URBAN ENVIRONMENT IN THE MUNICIPAL AREA "SULEIMAN-STEEL REGION" FOR 2019-2024 YEARS

Name of program

Responsible Executive of the Program

Source of finance

Total

Budget allocations (thousands of rubles)

Including by years:

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

5 6 6 6 3 ,8 3 8

9 5 5 7 ,0 4 8 8 7 8 , 6 5 8 8 8 7 8 , 6 5 8 9 2 5 2 ,4 6

9 2 5 2 ,4 6 9 2 5 2 ,4 6

Total, including:

Federal District Federal District Federal District 4 9 5 6 1 ,8 2 "Suleyman-

and budget

Municipal Administrator program "Formation of modern urban environment of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" for 2019- 2024 years

in the Steel District."

8 2 3 8 ,1 0 3 8 3 7 1 ,3 0 5 8 3 7 1 ,3 0 5

8 7 2 7 ,9

8 7 2 7 ,9

8 7 2 7 ,9

Republican Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Municipal budget

5 0 0 ,6 2 4

8 3 ,2 1 3

8 4 ,5 5 9

8 4 ,5 5 9

8 8 ,1 6

8 8 ,1 6

8 8 ,1 6

6 6 0 1 ,3 9 4

1 2 3 5 ,7 2

4 2 2 ,7 9 4 4 2 2 ,7 9 4

4 3 6 ,4 0

4 3 6 ,4 0

4 3 6 ,4 0

Annex No. 3 to the municipal program "Formation of a modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district"

on 2019-2024 years

PLAN OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MUNICIPAL PROGRAM "FORMATION OF THE MODERN URBAN ENVIRONMENT IN THE MUNICIPAL AREA "SULEIMAN-STEAL REGION" FOR 2019-2024 YEARS (hereinafter - the Program)

Named

Status

The Control Event

responsible for the performance of-

2019 St Petersburg. 2020 St Petersburg. 2021 St Petersburg. 2022 St Petersburg. 2022 St Petersburg. 2024St Petersburg

Programmes

1 1. Carrying out an inventory of improvement of yard territories, public territories (1 stage), territories of individual residential development and territories administered by legal entities and individual entrepreneurs (2 stage) and preparation of passports of improvement 2. Conclusion of agreements and ensuring improvement of territories of individual residential development and territories under the jurisdiction of legal entities of individual entrepreneurs at the expense of these persons 3. Approval and publication of the procedure and submission, consideration of the evaluation of proposals of citizens to include the yard area 4. Approval and publication

Timing

and

About

the University of London

Gel

3 Adminis - MP

5 0.1.03.

8

Adminis - MP

31 December

Adminis - MP

2 regulatory legal act of the administration of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" (hereinafter - the Administration)

I am the Administration with my own

Kam

and (use of trees) real estate objects

Regulatory legal act of the Administration

Normative y

Administra Ra

procedure and terms of submission, consideration and evaluation of proposals of citizens, organizations on inclusion in the Program of public territories 5. Approval and publication of the procedure for public discussion of the draft Program

6.Creation of a municipal public commission for coordination and control over the implementation of the Program 7. Conducting public discussions and approval of the corrected rules for the improvement of the territories of municipalities of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" 8.Development (amendment) and publication for public discussion of the period of discussion less 30 the Project Program 9.Approval

not days)

(with

the MP

Legal act Administration

Administrator of MR

Administrator of MR

1 5 .01.2019

15.0 1 .

15.01.20 2 21

2020

15.01.2 022

15.01.2 023

15.01.2 024

MR radio administrator

Regulatory legal act of the Administration

Normative legal act of the Administration

Normative legal acts of local self-government bodies of municipalities

the Project Programmes

Administrator of the MR

31.03

31.03 31.03

Normative Administrator 31.03

31.03 31.03 31.0

31.03

31.03

(modifications)

Programmes

10. Preparation and

approval, taking into account the discussion with interested parties and individuals, of design projects for the improvement of yard and public areas included in the Program 11. Conclusion of an agreement on granting a subsidy from the republican budget of the RD to the budget of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" to support the Program (hereinafter - the Agreement) 12. Appointment of a responsible person and regular placement of information in the module "Formation of a comfortable urban environment" of the state information system of housing and communal services (GIS of housing and communal services) during the entire period of the implementation of the Program 13. Quarterly reports and reports

a- LL

Administrator of MR

01.05.

01.05. 2020

01.05. 2021

1.05 202 2

1.05. 2023.

1.05. 2024.

Legal act of the Administration Approved Designs - projects posted on the website of the Administration of the MR

E-Agreement

Administrator of the MR

01.05.

01.05. 01.05. 01.05. 01.05. 01.05.

Help information

Administrator of MR

Father

MR radio administrator

t

Daily up to 10 number of sl going to s

hedges up to 10 numbers

hedgehogs up to 10 numbers

quarterly d at 10 sl going to his month

The number of days is 10.

the Agreement in Minstroy RD

his month

I am going to the month of the month.

. . his

10 January

I'm going to eat him.

2 0 2 2 -2 0 2 3 years months

10 January

January 10 January

10

10 January 2 0 2 4 - 2 0 2 5 Gov.

Annex No. 4 to the municipal program "Formation of a modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district" for 2019-2024 years

XII. PROCEDURE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, DISCUSSION WITH INTERESTED PERSONS AND APPROVAL OF DESIGN PROJECTS FOR THE GOODNESS OF DOUBLE AND PUBLIC TERRITORIES INCLUDING OF PROPOSALS IN THE MUNICIPAL PROGRAM "FORMATION OF THE MODERN REGION 2019-2024 YEARS (hereinafter - the Program)

1.1.

This Agreement regulates the development process,

discussions with stakeholders and approval of design projects

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

"Security

improvement of yard areas and public areas when including proposals in the Program (hereinafter - the Procedure) and developed in accordance with the G radostroitelnyj code of the Russian Federation, the Federal law on 06.10.2003 City No 131-FZ "On the General Principles of Self-Government in the Russian Federation", the organization of local by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation 09.02.2019 N 106 "Amendments to Annex N 15 to the state program of the Russian Federation for affordable and comfortable housing and public services of citizens of the Russian Federation"; and the Rules for the improvement of the territories of municipalities of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district", in order to ensure a single concept of the architectural appearance of the urban environment in the village. Kasumkent, Orta-Stal, Nova Maka, Ispik, Ashaga-Stal, Ashaga-Stal-Kazmalar, G Jereikhanovskoe, Sovkhoz, Eminkhur, Yukhari-Stal, Darkushkazmalar, Nytyug, Alkadar, Kurkent. and (hereinafter - municipalities). 1.2. the territories included in the Program are understood as public graphic and text material with a description of the works and activities proposed for implementation (hereinafter referred to as the design project). The design project is developed in the form of design and estimate documentation for improvement - architectural, planning, landscape, design, engineering and technical solutions, including parts and components, necessary and sufficient for the production of construction and installation works.

Department

2

Under the design projects of improvement of yard territories and

1.3.

The persons concerned include: persons authorized to

submission of proposals on the inclusion of the yard or public area in the Program, owners of premises in apartment buildings, owners of other buildings and structures located within the boundaries of the subject yard territory and (or) public area, improvement (hereinafter - interested persons).

2. DESIGN PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

2.1.

Design projects are developed in accordance with

Rules for the improvement of the territories of municipal entities of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district", the requirements of the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the current construction and other rules and regulations, taking into account measures to ensure the physical, spatial, information accessibility of courtyard and public areas for the disabled and people with limited mobility.

-

Definition

2.2. Before the development of the project of integrated improvement of the territory, pre-project analysis and formation of the project vision is carried out, analysis of the existing situation, identification of individual characteristics and problems of the territory, collection of initial data, as well as ideas and wishes of local residents. The results of the interaction of interested parties are drawn up and visualized to ensure the widest possible access.

design,

Land

Borders

2.3. The design project is developed taking into account a unified approach to the formation of a modern comfortable urban environment and includes the text (descriptive) part and the graphic part, including in the form of visualized images of the proposed project.

The text part includes the following sections: - general explanatory note; - photo fixation and description of the existing situation and objects. The graphic part includes: - scheme of planning organization of the territory; - plan of arrangement of small architectural forms and equipment, - specification of small architectural forms and elements; - ZE-visualization (at least two images). 2.4. The development of design projects is carried out by the administration of the municipal - "Suleyman-Stal Administration" within five days from the date of approval by the public commission for the evaluation of proposals of interested persons, monitoring the implementation of the municipal program "Formation of a modern urban environment in the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky District" for 2019-2024 years (hereinafter - the public commission) of the protocols for the assessment (ranking) of applications of interested persons for inclusion in the address lists of the program of the yard.

District

district"

(more)

2.5. Development of design projects for the improvement of the yard area of an apartment building is carried out taking into account the minimum list of works on improvement established by the Government of the Republic of Dagestan.

3. DISCUSSION, HARMONIZATION AND APPROVAL OF DESIGN PROJECTS WITH Stakeholders, developed by

3.1. For discussion

design - projects are posted on the official website of the Administration.

3.2. In order to coordinate design projects for landscaping

Multi-Apartment

Homes, Administration

The authorized person shall notify the authorized person who has the right to act in the interests of all owners of premises in an apartment building, the adjacent territory of which is included in the address list of yard areas of the draft Program (hereinafter - the authorized person), about the readiness of the design project within 1 working day from the date of its manufacture.

3.2. The authorized person provides discussion, approval of the design - project, for its further approval within a period not exceeding 3 working days.

3.3. Design projects approved by the public commission with indication of the addresses of objects placement are approved by the head of the Administration within two working days. Design projects are approved in two copies, one copy is sent to Minstroy RD, the other is stored in the Administration.

4. PROCEDURE FOR APPLICATION FOR PARTICIPATION IN DISCUSSION WITH

INTERESTED DESIGN PROJECTS

4.1. The application (Pr and l of the same and e Noq6) for participation in the discussion of the design project (or) public yard area of an apartment building and the territory of a municipality - the Application) is submitted (hereinafter the interested person to the Administration in writing within the period established in the notification on the selection of yard and public areas and is subject to mandatory registration in the register of incoming correspondence.

The deadline for submitting Applications should be no more than 14 calendar days from the date of publication of the message on the website of the organizer of the discussion with interested parties of design projects.

All application forms and attached documents must be stitched and numbered. The application must be sealed by the participant of the discussion (for legal entities) and signed by the participant of the discussion.

4.2. The following documents are attached to the Application: 1

in an apartment building, in which the composition of interested persons from among the owners of the premises is determined to participate in the discussion with the interested territories of apartment buildings;

Owners of premises

design projects

Courtyards

Assembly

Faces

2) design project with the changes taking into account the technical

opportunities, and without changing the design and estimate documentation.

4.3. Consideration of applications is carried out by the public commission, in accordance with the requirements established by this Procedure, on which

The minutes of the meeting of the commission (hereinafter - the Protocol) are drawn up, in which the Applications of all participants are necessarily evaluated, indicating changes and other information.

4.4.

Protocol

Signed

All

Members

The Commission,

present at the meeting and posted on the official website of the Administration and in the media within three working days from the date of its signing.

If at the end of the application period only one

Application for participation in the discussion, the Commission considers the specified Application.

If the Application complies with the requirements and conditions of this Procedure, specified in the design estimate documentation, must be performed in accordance with the amendments to the design project.

If the discussion fails, the work is performed

previously agreed upon design.

Reference No. 5

to the P order of development, discuss D-en and me

with interested persons and approvals

Design projects of improvement

the Courtyards and Common Estates of the Territories

When the zenium was included, he proposed og en and y in P rogram m y

ADDRESS LIST OF PUBLIC TERRITORIES

Targeted list of public areas that have passed public discussion and are subject to improvement

Minimum list of improvements

Year of implementation

Estimated cost (thousand rubles)

No. p/p

Address list of public territories that have passed public discussion and are subject to

Beautification

Park improvement on the street. C. Alderova in Orta Stall.

c.

Improvement of the public area of the square on Lenin Street in the village. New Maca

The city of Ispic, on the street.

Improvement of the public territory of the obelisk to the participants of the Second World War c. Ashaga-Stal

1.

2.

3.

4.

Installation of fences, sawing of old age trees, laying paving slabs, installation of paving stones, installation of paving stones, installation of canopy, lighting, installation of benches, installation of litter bins, installation of playgrounds, installation of playgrounds, installation of fencing, laying paving stones, installation of lighting, installation of benches, installation of playgrounds

2019

3464,163

2019

4535,950

2019

1569,40

2020

2 607,259

Improvement of public territory, alleys of Eminhur village

The improvement of the park named after Y.G. Hereikhanov on Lenin Street in the village of Gereikhanovskoye

Improvement of public territory, park village Nytyug

Improvement of public territory, public square of Kurkent

Improvement of public territory, alleys of Yukhari-Stal

Laying of paving slabs, installation of side stones, installation of benches, installation of garbage bins, lighting device

Sawing of old trees device paths from paving slabs, installation of side stones, installation of a gazebo, lighting device, children's playground, playground, landscaping.

Laying of paving slabs, installation of side stones, installation of benches, installation of garbage bins, lighting device, children's playground device, landscaping.

Laying of paving slabs, installation of side stones, installation of benches, installation of garbage bins, lighting device

Laying of paving slabs, installation of side stones, installation of benches, installation of garbage bins, lighting device, children's playground device, landscaping.

2020

3 082,708

2020

3 188,691

2021

2900,00

2021

3500,031

2022

2900,031

Improvement of public territory, alleys c. Ashaga-Stal, on S.Stalskogo Street

Laying of paving slabs, installation of side stones, installation of benches, installation of garbage bins, lighting device, landscaping

2022

4357,031

5.

6.

7.

8

9

10

11

Improvement of public territory, public square of the village of Tsmur

Laying of paving slabs, installation of side stones, installation of benches, installation of garbage bins, lighting device Laying of paving slabs,

2023

1900,031

2024

2550,031

12

Improvement

public territory, square village Alkadar

13

Improvement of public territory, square in the village. Darkush-Kazmalyar

installation of side stones, installation of benches, installation of garbage bins, lighting device Laying of paving slabs, installation of side stones, installation of benches, installation of garbage bins, lighting device, children's playground device, landscaping.

2024

3500,031

Reference No. 6

to the P order of development, discuss D-en and me

with interested persons and approvals

Design projects of improvement

the Courtyards and Common Estates of the Territories

When the zenium was included, he proposed og en and y in P rogram m y

APPLICATION for participation in the discussion with interested parties and approval of design projects

D ata__________________ Where: Administration of the municipal district "Suleyman-Stalsky district": p. Kasumkent, st. Lenina d. 26 Name of participant ____________________________________ Location of participant _________________________________

(legal address and postal address, place of residence)

INN, OGRN, KPP (for legal reasons c a)___________________________

Passport details (for an individual)____________________________ Contact phone number (fax)___________________________________

Having studied the procedure of discussion with interested parties of design projects

in the face

(name of the participant)

They want to participate in the design process.

(name of position and name of signatory)

Suggest changes_______________________________________________

The minutes of the meeting of the Commission we ask you to send in writing to the Commissioner

Representative: _____________________________________________________

(type of work, address of the territory)

(Name of the representative, address) This application is accompanied by documents n a ____ l. D alzhnost________________________________________

(signature, surname, name, patronymic of the signatory)

Annex No. 7 to the municipal program

Visualized list of samples of improvement elements offered for placement in the yard territory in accordance with the minimum list of improvement works

Nr. p/p

Visualized image

Name, characteristics

~ T .

Bench

Bench without back:

bench length - 1,5 m;

width - 380 mm;

height - 680 mm.

Bench without back:

bench length - 2,0 m;

width - 385 mm;

height - 660 mm.

Bench with back:

bench length - 2,085 m;

width - 770 mm;

height - 975 mm.

Bench with back:

Length: 1500 mm

Irina W: 550 mm

Height: 1000 mm

1.2.

1.3.

1.4.

2.

Urna

Metal urn "Wooden decor": height - 665mm;

width - 420 mm;

Volume:10 L

Garbage bin:

height - 540 m;

width - 400 mm;

Volume: 20 l.

Street urn:

height - 570 mm;

width - 480 mm;

Volume: 40 l.

In the rna d l i m y s o r a UM -5:

Length: 220 mm

Irina W: 250 mm

Height: 900 mm

Volume: 20 l.

2.2.

2.4.

F he ar

Project materials · Full published text

Development of Khasavyurt

Source status: Project

Materials on Khasavyurt’s development — territorial area.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/razvitie-hasavyura.html

Open on the site

Approved by the Decision of the Assembly of Deputies of the Ministry of Defense "Khasavyurtovsky District" of 27.12. 2018, No 21- VI CD

STRATEGY OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF "KHASAVURTOV REGION" FOR THE PERIOD TO 2025

Republic of Dagestan

Khasavyurt district 2018 year

1

The content of the Strategy of socio-economic development of the Khasavyurt municipal district for the period up to 2025

Contents

Page

№

Section I

Section II

2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13

Scheme of territorial planning. Main content. Characteristics of the district Analysis of the socio-economic situation and main directions of development of the municipality "Khasavyurtovsky district" Demographic policy, standard of living of the population Agro-industrial complex Industry Investments and construction, housing and communal services Transport and communication Small and medium business Consumer market Finance Health Education Labor market Culture Physical culture and sports, youth policy

Section III Main goals and objectives, terms and stages of implementation

Strategies

Section IV Main indicators of the level of social

Section V

the Economic Development of Khasavyurt Municipal District 2025 Year (Annex 1 on 2 p.) Volumes and sources of financing of activities under the Strategy of Khasavyurt municipal district to 2025 Year (Annex 2 on 8 Page.)

2

3-6

7-24

7-8 8-11 12 12-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-35

35

35-36

TERRITORIAL PLANNING SCHEME OF MUNICIPAL EDUCATION "KHASAVURTOV REGION" OF THE REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN

3

MAJOR CONTENTS

Strategy

socio-economic

in accordance with Administrative Decree No. 353 of 25.04.2016 About approval of the Action Plan for implementation of the Strategy of social and economic development of administration of the Ministry of Defense "Khasavyurtovsky district" till 2025 for 2016-2020 years

developed

Development

Strategy

Present

The development of the Khasavyurt municipal district for the period up to 2025 determines the long-term goals and priorities, tasks, as well as the main directions of economic and social development of the municipal district.

socio-economic

Strategy

prepared by

with Methodical recommendations of the Ministry of Economy and Territorial Development of the Republic of Dagestan. The strategy is a document that defines the socio-economic policy of local self-government bodies for the long term.

Conform

is

Basic

the University of London

The strategy addresses the following issues:

1. Consolidation of all members of the community

solutions to key problems.

2. Coordination of the process of strategic management of the district 3.Improving the investment attractiveness of the district.

1. Characteristics of the Ministry of Defense "Khasavyurtovsky district" of the Republic of Dagestan

Khasavyurt district of the Republic of Dagestan

geostrategic position.

Distance to the Republican Center – 82 Kilometers General area – 1423,6 Kilomile2 , or 3 % from the entire square of Dagestan. The length of paved roads is 339,3 Kilometers The Rostov-Baku highway of international importance passes through the district, as well as the Astrakhan-Makhachkala highway, the Kavkaz highway and others.

A railway passes through the Khasavyurt district. The main operating passenger lines are Moscow-Baku, Kiev-Baku, Moscow-Tbilisi and others. Built in 90 years railway line Kizlyar-Karlanyurt connects Dagestan with the center in the second branch and reduces the transit of goods from Europe and Russia to Asia and back.

Located in the northern part of the country, it is one of the

large areas of the Republic of Dagestan with an agrarian orientation. It borders: in the north - with Babayurt district of RD, in the south - with Novolak, Kazbek district of RD, in the east - with Kizilyurt district of RD, the Ministry of Defense "Hasaviurt" RD, in the west - with the Chechen Republic.

The area has favorable climatic conditions, and also has a large resource and labor potential. The Majors

4

population settlements of the district are: Aksai, Mutsalaul, Kokrek, Kurush, Endirei (8296 - 10475 people).

Average annual resident population of the district in 2017

It was 169,8 thousand people.

The administrative center of the district is located in the city of Khasavurt. On the territory of Khasavyurt municipal district 42 rural municipalities were formed - rural settlements, with a total number of rural settlements - 56.

The territory of Khasavyurt district covers 142,358 thousand hectares. In the use of individuals in the district is 5,98 thousand hectares, legal entities - 136,37 thousand hectares. The area of farmland is 89,4 thousand hectares.

Relief and elements of geomorphology

Khasavyurt district is mainly located on the plane, is included in the

Central area of the Republic.

According to the physico-geographical zoning, most of the northern territory of the region belongs to the North Dagestan region and is located within the Kumyk dry steppe plain.

Geomorphologically, the northern part of the territory is confined to the delta-alluvial-marine modern plain with absolute marks varying from 20 to 100 m.

Tersko - Sulak

C

The central part of the territory is a foothill terraced quaternary-age plain with absolute marks from 20 to 100 m. The southern, smaller part of the territory belongs to the Gorno-Dagestan region of the Greater Caucasus, the north-western foothills occupy the Outer (Pre-mountain) Dagestan. The southern part of the territory of Khasavyurt district has pre-mountain erosion-tectonic dissected asymmetric ridges, here the absolute marks vary from 100 to 800-1000 m. The surface is disturbed by the valleys of the rivers Aksai, Yaryksu, Aktash, Yaman-su, etc. Mineral resources

relief,

Strongly

C

Mineral resources of Khasavyurt district are represented by hydrocarbon raw materials, construction materials, groundwater. Hydrocarbon raw materials

The area has several promising areas for exploration

Hydrocarbon raw materials. Building materials are represented by clays and loams. 3 deposits have been explored - Aksay, Batashevsky, Ayunskoye. We do not have information about reserves, development of deposits.

Water resources

Surface water at

The Khasavyurt district is represented by the waters of the Aksai, Aktash, Yaryksu, Yamansu, Yuzbash, Umash rivers, their tributaries, large and small lakes and reservoirs.

5

Presny

Underground

for household and drinking water supply. One field, Khasavyurtskoye, has been explored and operated. Projected fresh groundwater resources by area 147,5 thousand.m3/day. Approved reserves exceed 6 thousand.m3/day.

are used

Everywhere

Water

Soils

The area is dominated by meadow soils, which cover about 75% areas. According to morphological features, they are very diverse, but the general is dark gray color and grain-comic structure.

Foothills and river terraces occupy chestnut soils. They are developed on alluvial deposits, mainly light mechanical composition.

Lugo-wet soils occupy about 12% area of the district. They are characterized by the presence of excessive moisture, a large content of humus. A significant part of the area is occupied by salt flats.

Vegetation and the animal world

On elevated areas, xerophytic-desert semi-shrubs and numerous ephemers grow; reduced and moist areas are occupied by cereal-multi-herbal vegetation, and highly salty areas by salty vegetation. On light - chestnut soils are widely distributed desert steppes with grasses and cereals. Animal world: fox, jackal, wolf, raccoon dog, ferret, pheasant, gray quail, quail, pigeons.

Climate

The climate of the region is greatly influenced by the Caspian Sea,

which softens it and moistens the air.

Average annual air temperature 10-120C, maximum 33-360C is observed in July-August, The absolute minimum is minus 170 at the bottom to minus 25-300C in the North.

The amount of rainfall varies from 350 to 480 mm per year. Snow cover here is extremely unstable, usually appears in December. The number of days with snow varies from 10-15 to 30 days. Duration of frost-free period 230-250 days.

The prevailing winds in the warm season are eastern and

Winds in the west, in the cold.

Plain terrain, satisfactory soil fertility, agricultural production. Winter cereals, corn, rice, vegetables, melon fodder crops, as well as fruits and grapes are cultivated here.

allow

develop

climate,

warm

6

II.Analysis of the socio-economic situation and main directions of development of the municipal formation "Khasavyurtovsky district"

Social development of municipal education is characterized by education,

demographic health, culture, and living standards of the population.

indicators,

Status

Sphere

2.1.Demographics, standard of living of the population According to the district statistics authority is – 169,8 Thousands of people or 5,5 % Population of the Republic (at 01.01.2018 G.) The number of households is - 39253 units. The whole population is rural. The area occupied is 1423,6 Sq. km (3 % population density of the republic – 119,3 person per sq.km (60,9 by RD). The demographic situation in recent years, as in Dagestan as a whole, is characterized by a certain trend of population growth. This is facilitated by an increase in the birth rate and a decrease in the mortality of the population. As a result, over 33,2 % The population consists of children of school and preschool age. V 2017 The families of the district were born 3412 Kids. On 1000 The population was born 22,6 children (according to RD, this indicator – 16,4).

Table 1. The main demographic indicators of the municipality "Khasavyurtovsky district"

Indicators

2015 years

2016 years

2017 years

Number of permanent residents (at the end of the year), people

163919

Born, man.

The dead, man.

Natural increase ("-" loss), ppl.

3660

923

2737

167115

169800

3 563

3412

934

969

2 629

2443

Natural growth rate, per 1000 population

166,9

157,3

143,8

Over the last 3 years, by the end of 2017, the resident population of the Khasavyurt district increased by an average of 3,5 % due to an increase in the birth rate.

The number of citizens receiving pensions for the year 2017 was 34202 people (their disability - 15876 people) or 20,1 % of the total population. Paid through the branch of the pension fund of Russia on RD to the population of pensions, benefits and social assistance in the amount of 7

5007 million rubles. The average monthly pension per pensioner in the district for 2017 year amounted to 9431 rubles.

Table 12. Indicators of living standards of the population

Indicators

The food is measured.

including by years: 2015

2016

2017

Average monthly salary of employees of large and medium-sized organizations in the region

Salary

rub.

14543,6

18153,6

18879

Number of pensioners registered in the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation

thousands of people

31691

32918

34202

Average monthly population per capita

Cash

income

rub.

4354

4943,6

5199

Total funds spent on social support

The population of the district through the Department of social protection of the population of the district for 2017 was 682,3 million rubles.

There are 21096 recipients of social support measures registered in the district. Particular attention was paid to the issues of social support for large families. Within the framework of the republican law "On measures of social support for large families" and other normative acts, 4950 people used the right to various payments for a total amount of 448,4 million rubles. Preferential categories of citizens were paid for housing and utilities at the expense of all budgets in the amount of 157,1 million rubles.

In the area they live 165 Families who educate 218 Child Caregivers, 3 Family with 3 –I have adopted children. 8 Orphans for 2017 The year is provided with housing. Are registered with the Ministry of Education as needing to provide accommodation 67 Orphans and children without living space.

2.2.Agroindustrial complex

critical role in the current economic situation, and especially in

Import substitution conditions are allocated to agriculture, which is the most important direction of the economy of our region.

The share of the agricultural sector of the economy in the gross regional product is 92 %. In the agricultural area employs more than 57,4 % employed in the economy of the population, which is 30519 people. Agricultural activities in the area

47 agricultural organizations, KFH -12811, of which 81 are active and 22819 are personal households of the population.

The total area of agricultural land of the district is 103,3 thousand hectares, of which the main share (57,2 %) is arable land, 34,5 % - pastures, 6 % - perennial plantations. More than 34,4 % cultivated area is occupied by grain crops.

8

Total area of crops in all categories of farms in 2017 the Year of the Year 58,9 thousand ha. the Winter Grains Cleaning Area 2017 The Year - 15,01 thousand ha. The share of irrigated land in the total area of agricultural land is – 50,7 . the Farmhouses 69.4%.

Table 2. Structure of used crop areas in farms of all categories in the municipality (ha)

The name of indicators The area of arable land, ha The entire sown area for the crop, ha including grain potatoes feed vegetables

2015St Petersburg. 59376 54157 19048 1349 4907 19800

2016St Petersburg. 59376 58200 19900 1400 5000 24800

2017 St Petersburg. 59376 59400 20400 1400 5100 25300

The workers of the district managed to maintain a positive year in 2017

dynamics of growth of individual indicators.

Plant production is

V 2017 The share of profitable farms 100 % of the total number. In total, the profits of agricultural enterprises amounted to 80,7 million rubles, or on 5,5 % More than was in 2016 year. Agricultural production in all categories of farms 2017 The year in current prices was 8625,5 Millions of rubles or 105,2 % to the level 2016 years. of total agricultural products in (57 %), Proportion of livestock – 3731,4 Millions of rubles (43 %). Per resident, the implementation of 2017 The year in terms of the agricultural production plan was 102,1%. Implementation of planned indicators and growth of production rates in comparison with 2016 the year was mainly due to an increase in the yield of all produced as well as quality indicators of livestock products

Khasavyurt district is 7,0% from the level in the Republic of Dagestan.

4894,1 million rubles

agricultural products,

agricultural products.

Producing

Major

thousand rubles

Products

Specific

Rural

Volumes

Species

50,8

crop production, is grain, vegetables, fruits and grapes.

Production

to meet all the needs of the grain consumed. All technical and more than 74 percent of grain are grown in agricultural enterprises.

The grain in the area is

The main producers of vegetables, fruits and grapes are

population and peasant and farm enterprises.

Share of individual categories of farms in total agricultural production 2017 The year was characterized as follows: agricultural enterprises –11 %, peasant (farm) farms – 12 % and personal households of the population – 77 % . By results 2017 the Year of Construction 35,4 The vineyards and 108 Ha Gardens,

9

The multi-year plan has been implemented 106,5 %. In the first half 2018 the Year of Planting 35 Gardens and 5 vineyards, with an annual planting plan – 100 Gardens and 25 Ha Vineyards.

The share of poultry meat has increased in the total volume of livestock production. A great contribution to the development of poultry is made by Batyr-Broiler LLC with modern poultry houses, incubators. 33 % poultry meat is produced in this enterprise from the total production in the region. On its territory, feed mills with a capacity of 10 thousand tons of high-performance feed per hour were built. In 2017 year completed the construction of new poultry houses, a new slaughter shop.

Despite the difficulties

In agriculture, there are

a sustainable basis for further progressive development.

Table 3. Indicators of development of the agro-industrial complex of Khasavyurt district for 2015-2017 years.

Indicators

The food is measured.

Including by year: 2017 2016 2015

Crop production Sown areas of agricultural crops, ha

Cereals , total including wheat Vegetables and melon Sunflower Gardens (fruit-bearing) Vineyards (fruit-bearing)

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

19048 9177 4907 5737 1826 1036

Crop yields

Cereals , total including wheat Sunflowers Vegetables and melons Gardens (fruit-bearing) Vineyards (fruit-bearing)

c/ha c/ha c/ha c/ha c/ha c/ha c/ha

31,9 27,8 12,3 210,2 45,1 30,1

Gross agricultural product collection

Cereals , in total including wheat Sunflower Vegetables and melons Fruits Grapes Meat KRS and birds (in live weight) Milk Eggs Chicken Livestock - number of cattle including cows Small cattle Bird

thousand tons thousand tons thousand tons thousand tons thousand tons thousand tons thousand tons thousand tons thousand tons million pieces 76

60,7 25,5 7,1 103,9 8,2 2,5 26,1 64,1

19869 9950 5230 5885 1596 1060

30,2 26,5 11,8 212,1 46,2 44,5

60,1 26,4 7 110,9 7,3 4,7 26,1 53,9 76,7

20378 10930 5421 5816 1611 1351

30,7 26,4 12 213,4 51,2 42,8

62,5 28,8 7 116,3 8,2 5,8 26,2 54,2 75,6

thousands of heads 57,3 thousands of heads 26,4 thousands of heads 90,8 thousands of heads 1997,

51,6 24,7 90,3 2201,7

53,1 25,4 93 1178,3

1

10

of them laying hens, Productivity of cattle and poultry Nadoy on 1 cow Eggs on 1 hen laying hens

thousand heads 628,1

634,4

605,3

kg pieces

2425 121

2176 121

2130 125

Key problems of the current period in the development of rural

Farms:

• high prices for new equipment; • disparity in prices for agricultural products and products

used in agriculture, including energy; • lack of working capital and long-term investments; • underdevelopment of infrastructure

Seed Production

and tribal

livestock;

• decrease in soil fertility; • lack of industrial processing of products in Khasavyurt district, which limits the possibility of selling products from agricultural producers;

• No regulated and managed product markets

agricultural producers;

• Inadequate training system, shortage of specialists,

lack of effective managers in the industry;

• low labor productivity in the industry, a shortage of own sources of financing and low wages, which is 2- 2,5 Fewer than in other industries.

Table 4. X. Investment projects implemented in the Khasavyurt municipal district

Name and characteristics of the investment project Construction of poultry complex with a shop for slaughter and processing of poultry meat "Batyr-Breller" p. Botayurt Khasavyurt district 2018 Mr. - 350 million rubles. Construction of an animal farm for breeding fox in the agroindustrial complex "Rosomakha" off-budget investments in 2018 Mr.- 17,8 million rubles. Laying gardens on the square 120 ha of them 20 the Intensive Gardens Extrabudgetary Investments 2018 St Petersburg. – 14,0 Millions of rubles Carrying out capital-restorative planning of rice checks of KFH "Mamaeva" and MUP "im. Nurova" in the square 150 Extrabudgetary investments in 2018 Mr. - 3,15 million rubles.

Effective solution of these problems, including with the help of state support for the industry, will largely determine the qualitative transformations in the agro-industrial complex of the Khasavyurt district.

11

2.3. Industry

The volume of shipped goods and services in general for the district industry for 2017 amounted to 45,7 million rubles or 105 % to 2016 years.

The most significant contribution to the economy of the district is made by enterprises for the production of industrial products of Dazu LLC - brick production, Kostek, Sana-Plast LLC - the manufacture of plastic doors and windows of Novo-Kostek, Rossomakha SCPC - fur of Novo-Kostek, mills of Novo-Kostek, Botashyurt, Kurush, individual entrepreneurs for the production of paving slabs.

Table 5. Indicators of development of industry of Khasavyurt district for 2015-2017 years.

Indicators

Volume of shipped goods of own production, performed works and services by own efforts Production of main types of industrial products in physical terms: Flour Feed Bread and agricultural products Production of plastic windows and doors Production of concrete and concrete products Production of paving slabs

Meals measured. million rubles

Including by year: 2017 2016 2015

36,75

43,5

45,7

tons tons tons thousand m3 thousand m3 thousand m3

394 132 321 1,69 1,6 40,7

418 100 353 1,93 1,63 41,3

418,8 100,5 354 1,98 1,76 42,7

2.4. Investment and construction, housing and communal services

Total fixed capital investments

development of the economy and social sphere of the municipal district at the expense of all sources of financing for 2017 the Year 2 797 million rubles, increase to the level 2016 years 111,1 %.

Investments have been made in various sectors of the economy of the region:

The federal budget for the amount – 500,6 million rubles; - Republican investment program – 15,8 million rubles; - from the local budget – 126,8 million rubles; - private investment in individual housing construction – 1880,1 million rubles; - funds for laying multi-year plantings – 76,2 million rubles; - extrabudgetary funds – 197,4 Millions of rubles.

V 2017 In the same year, at the expense of the federal budget, the construction of a secondary school in the village of Karlanyurt was completed 500 Student seats, c.Kadyrotar 120 The place, drilled artwell in the village. Terechnoe.

12

Table 6. Indicators of the volume of investments of Khasavyurt district for 2015-2017 years.

Including by year: 2017 2016 2015

2126

Indicators

The food is measured. The volume of investments (in fixed capital) for millions of all sources of financing - total rubles. including by types of activity: million rubles. Agriculture million rubles. 178,1 Construction of millions of rubles. 1725,2 Transport million rubles. 39 Municipal administration of millions of rubles. 15,8 million rubles. 132,1 Education Other public and personal services RUB million. 35,8 From the total amount of funding sources: Own funds of enterprises Budget funds-total including: federal budget republican budget local budget Housing funds

million rubles. 12,6 million rubles. 215,6 million rubles. 120,2 million rubles. 18,9 million rubles. 76,4 million rubles. 1741

Individual

Population

the City

2509,4

2797,1

447,8 1894,9 17,5 51,6 69,8 27,5

476,7 148,7 45 32,7 71 1884,3

273,7 1880,2 49,5 78,4 504,4 10,9

269,5 647,4 497,6 23 126,8 1880

The Road Fund for 2017 Year Asphaltized 4,7 km of roads, 1,6 km of sidewalks for the amount 48,9 Millions of rubles. The construction of the gas pipeline and major repairs spent 10,8 Millions of rubles.

Within the framework of the Republican investment program, major repairs were carried out and equipment was purchased in KFOR Toturbiykal in the amount of 15,8 million rubles. In 2017 the construction was completed and the administrative building in the village of Endirei was introduced.

From the local budget of the district for the construction and overhaul of social facilities spent: in education - 3,7 million rubles, for mass sports - 18,0 million rubles, culture - 29,0 million rubles. Introduced individual developers 71 thousand square meters. meters of housing.

Area of dwellings based on 1 a District Resident 2017 the Year

The average was 16,4 square meters.

Construction of socio-cultural and municipal state facilities

Mainly

account

the National Park

Appointments are made with capital investments.

The entire housing stock is privately owned by the rural

terrain.

As of 1.01.2018g. registered for housing is 6228

young families.

Housing and communal

Khasavyurt district represents the branch of non-production sphere necessary for life support of population and other consumers with housing and communal services.

Municipal Farming

13

The district administration pays daily attention to housing and communal services - providing the population with drinking water, construction and repair of drainage and gas networks, maintenance of roads within the boundaries of the district settlements.

The housing stock of Khasavyurtovsky is 2842,6 thousand square meters of private housing.

District 01.01.2018

The total area of the housing stock, which has dropped out during the year in 2017 the Year of the Master 1812 sqm Construction of housing on the territory of the municipality "Khasavyurtovsky district" is carried out at the expense of individual developers.

The average for the district is equipped with: water supply 65% total residential

fund, natural gas heating 100 % , water supply 50%.

The single length of the street water network is 713,2 km.

V 2017 Year completed and put into operation; • construction of a gas pipeline in Aksai, Karlanyurt and overhaul of gas networks in the settlements of the district for the amount of 10,8 Millions of rubles

• road works for the amount of 49,6 million rubles. • private houses 233 units were built.

-

Farming

One of the acute problems of the financial condition of housing - for the growth of public services provided. V 2017 the Public Debt for Housing and Utilities 310,5 Millions of rubles from the amount 952,5 Millions of rubles a year. The cost of housing and communal payments for the population 1 per person per month 2017 The year was 561 Rubles. The level of collection of payments for housing services is 69,3 %.

Debts

Population

Subsidies for housing and communal services are provided to low-income families. Preferential categories of citizens were paid for housing and utilities at the expense of all budgets in the amount of 157,1 million rubles.

All human settlements

Electrified. The total length of electrical networks is 1792 km. The main consumer of energy resources is the population of the district, which accounts for 81,6 % of the total useful supply of electricity in the district.

District

Electricity supply in the area is satisfactory. However, electrical networks are characterized by high wear and, as a result, large losses in the transmission of electricity.

In all settlements in the areas of new residential development, it is necessary to build additional electric lines with the installation of transformer points.

2.5. Transport and communication To public roads of local importance include municipal roads, road network and road objects 14

infrastructures located in municipally owned settlements.

the University of London

the boundaries of human settlements,

On public passenger routes, 120 road units are involved, including 5 buses and route taxis - 115 units. The positive aspects of the transport network of the district include an extensive network of roads suitable for all settlements.

In Khasavyurt District, the total length of roads is 339.3 km, including 237.3 km of local roads, of which 158.1 km have an asphalt surface. All settlements in the district have regular road transport links with the district’s administrative centre, the city of Khasavyurt.

Annually

the National Library

Plan

Reconstruction

MoD Highways

"Khasavyurtovsky district" from the funds of the road fund. target program "Development of the road approved municipal economy on the territory of the municipality "Khasavyurtovsky district" for 2017-2019 years", which indicates the annual funding for the maintenance and repair of roads from the funds of the "Road Fund" and the municipal budget of the district.

The current level of development of the transport network of the area as a whole

It meets the needs of the population and the economy.

In perspective

Within the area is necessary

The following activities: construction and reconstruction of highways; creation and maintenance of a certain set of public bus routes, including for ensuring labor migration of the population and for ensuring cultural and household relations; creation of the AGNKS network (taking into account the increase in the share of gas engine fuel).

The development of communication contributes to meeting the needs of the population of the region in the field of obtaining and exchanging information, contributes to the inflow of investment in the sectors of the economy.

Currently in the municipal area only in 30

Out of 56 settlements of the district there are post offices. There is a wireless connection 3 mobile operators. Most of the area is in a zone of confident and satisfactory reception of the signal. All settlements of the district are covered by cellular communication services, television.

2.6. Small and medium business

The number of small businesses in the area 2017 the Year – 1889 Some of them are small businesses – 270 individual entrepreneurs - 1619 man. Turnover from small business entities for 2017 the Year 791,2 Millions of rubles. Volume

Receiving

Subjects

taxes,

Small

from

Entrepreneurship for the year 2017 amounted to 61 million rubles.

15

The number of small businesses in 10 Thousands of people 111,2 ed.

Average number of employees in small

The number of employees in 2017 was 1623.

Table 7. Information about the change in the number of small entities

Entrepreneurship and individual entrepreneurs

Indicators

1.Total registered small business entities including: total registered small business entities (without individual entrepreneurs, including microenterprises) Individual entrepreneurs 2.The share of the average number of employees (without external part-timers) of small and medium enterprises in the average number of employees (without external part-timers) of all enterprises of organizations

The food is measured.

including by years: 2016

2015

2017

units

2203

1845

1889

units

units

396

276

270

1807

1569

1619

%

5

5,4

6,1

For 2017 The year of execution of the plan by the number of identified employees with whom contracts were concluded was 129 %. In the plan-task 1228 People are registered 1578 man. Register as an individual entrepreneur in 2017 Year of delivery 338 People are provided

Further entrepreneurship as an important element of increasing the population and reducing tensions in the labor market.

Income development

Perspective

V

2.7. The consumer market

There are: shops - 490, pharmacies - 31, catering facilities - 15, gas stations - 30, 11 - points of provision of paid household services.

In the consumer market, positive results were noted in the reporting year. the Retail Trade Turnover 2017 the Year 641 Millions of rubles, implementation 108 %. Currently in use: Shops 490, Pharmacies - 31 , Catering facilities - 15, Gas Stations - 30, 11 - points of provision of paid domestic services.

the Khasavyurt Municipal Market

District

Taxes received in the consolidated budget of the district for 2017

from the activities of retail facilities in the amount of 15,4 million rubles.

The volume of paid services to the population through all sales channels in performance from current prices amounted to 1382,3 million rubles, the established plan amounted to 117,1 %. The largest share in paid services is payment for housing and communal services (90,2 %), for transport services - 6,3 %.

16

Table 8. Retail turnover and services

Indicators

1.Retail trade turnover (in full circle) Retail trade turnover per capita 2.Full-circle catering turnover) Public catering turnover per capita 3.Volume of paid services to the population full circle) Turnover of paid services to the population per capita

The food is measured.

million rubles.

thousand rubles.

including by years: 2016 8428,1

2015 7207

2017 641

44,2

50,4

40

(by

million rubles.

841,3

2520

2790

5,14

15,1

20

1157,4

1030,1

1084,2

7,1

6,17

6,4

thousand rubles.

(by

million rubles.

thousand rubles.

2.8. Finance

The main tool for carrying out social, financial and investment policy in the territory of the municipality is the district budget.

Expanding the tax base is one of the main sources

Create a consolidated budget for the area.

For 2017 The tax and non-tax revenue plan is implemented in the year - 121,3 %. Under the plan 239,9 Millions of rubles, the budget of the district – 291 Millions of rubles.

As a result of the intensification of the work of the interdepartmental working group on reducing informal employment, legalization of wages and increasing the collection of insurance contributions to extrabudgetary funds, additional tax revenues were received for the USN, UNIVD, ESHN for the period of the year 2017 g. in total – 7,8 Millions of rubles.

The total expenditure of the municipality in 2017 amounted to 1944,2 million rubles. Despite the difficult economic situation, the budget of the municipality in 2017 remained socially oriented. To finance social sectors of the economy: education, culture, housing and communal services and social policy, 92,6 % total budget expenditures were allocated from the district budget.

Within the framework of the priority project for the development of the RD "Obeleniya Economy", measures were implemented to expand tax and non-tax revenues of the district budget, to remove the economy from the "shadow". Weekly discussed at the meetings of the administration of the implementation of the planned tasks on taxes by rural settlements, also considered issues on the progress of updating land and capital construction projects.

For 2017 year with a plan 3261 units, updated - 5475 units of land (implementation of the plan 168 %). For capital objects

17

construction with a plan of 1926 units, updated - 3075 units. (implementation of the plan 160 %).

Table 9. Revenues and expenditures of the municipal budget

Indicators

1. Tax revenues 2.Non-tax revenues 3.Implementation of non-tax revenues of the MO budget 4.Gratis income from budgets at other levels 4.Local budget expenditure

Tax

Plans

and

Ed - za. 2015 million rubles. 199901 million rubles. 50300

Including by year: 2016 225903 97072

2017 223951 67912

%

103,9

110,6

121,3

Millions of rubles

1605337

1545515

1631249

million rubles 1865217

1830220

1944209

2.9. Health care for the translation of district

The institutions,

Health Care

Prophylactic

Despite the republican level, the organization and quality of health care services occupy an important place in the socio-economic development of the district. Network providing medical care to the population of the region, in 2017 The year remained unchanged. Today, the health sector is functioning: 13the District Hospitals 510 Beds, 17 Medical Outpatients 8- we have day hospitals on 50 Beds, 27 the Medical and Obstetric Centers, 3- Ambulance stations. Security of beds 10 Thousands of people are -30,3, what is in 2 below the national average (RD64,7) . The capacity of the medical and preventive institutions of the district is – 1995 Visits on shift. The area served 185 Doctors, 587 Average medical workers. Provision of medical services (for 10 Thousands of people – 11 Doctors (average republican indicator – 39,2), Secondary Medical Personnel – 35 The average Republican -81,8). For 2017 A year there are positive changes in the medical examination of certain groups of the population, the epidemic situation on tuberculosis has stabilized. V 2017 In order to improve the health indicators of the population, the Khasavyurt CSR adopted a set of measures to improve the quality of medical care. The diagnostic department was reconstructed and expanded, a biochemical and bacteriological laboratory appeared. Total morbidity rate 100 Thousands of people in the area 2017 Year has grown. In the first place among the diseases are diseases of the cardiovascular system, respiratory organs, digestion, trauma and poisoning. Table 10. Level of health development in municipal education

18

including by years: 2016

2017

2015

"Khasavyurtovsky district" Indicators

All

Doctors

Number of doctors by specialty 10 thousands of people at the end of the year Number of medical personnel Number of medical personnel 10 Total number of beds at the end of the year 10 Thousands of people

The food is measured.

man.

man.

man.

202

205

12,4

12,3

627

man.

39

units

units

455

28

632

37,9

510

31

185

11

587

35

510

30

The implementation of the Republic of Dagestan’s Priority Development Project “Healthy Dagestan” in Khasavyurt District is expected to improve the accessibility and quality of medical care, increase the number of days each hospital bed is used per year, reduce patients’ length of stay in round-the-clock inpatient care, and increase bed turnover.

Work is underway to improve the efficiency of work, the quality of medical services provided and the organization of payment for medical workers. Three-tiered health care systems have been introduced.

Children of orphans and children in difficult institutions in the

living situation, staying in a stationary number of 210 people.

Measures are being taken to cover the maximum number of singles

elderly citizens and disabled people with inpatient care. All the main regulatory documents for the medical examination are systematized. In GBU RD "HCRP" there is a license for medical activities and a license for types of medical examinations (preliminary and periodic). In the GBU RD "HCRP" there is an office of medical prevention. The schedule for passing the general medical examination for all settlements was approved. A visiting team of specialists has been created to conduct inspections of the medical examination.

2.10. Education

Education is one of the most important social sectors of the region. As of 01.01.2018 Years in the area 54 18 – Municipal State Preschool Educational Institutions (including. 5 non-state), correctional boarding school - 1, the House of Children 's Creativity 1, 1-station of children's and youth tourism and local history, 1 –the Center for Gifted Children.

General educational institutions,

19

Of 54 general educational institutions, 18 are located in standard buildings, 37 - in non-standard (adapted) premises, 9 schools are in an emergency condition.

The proportion of students in municipal general educational institutions engaged in the first shift is 58 % (according to RD-73,6%). In the school year 2016-2017, 24156 students were enrolled in educational institutions of the district.

Coverage of children from 3-7 the Preschool Education Program 2017 the Year – 23,3 %. The number of children attending pre-school educational institutions is 3131, In other words, non-state 454 children. The number of children registered for preschool education is - 2111 children or 7,5 % Total number of children 1-6 years.

In the year 2017, the number of places in kindergartens was increased.

institutions for 364 places through public-private partnership. 2518 children were covered in the groups of short-term maintenance of children for the availability of preschool education in the main educational institutions.

Number

Pedagogy

Employees

the University of London

Educational

Institutions – 3128 man. The proportion of persons who passed the single state exam, from the number of graduates of municipal institutions participating in the single state exam was 92,2 % (2016 Mr.- 85,4 %). The proportion of students in municipal general education institutions engaged in the first shift was 2017 the Year 58 %.

The issue of child employment is of particular relevance. In the villages of the district there are branches of sports schools, there are flat sports grounds and football fields of different levels. Since 2017, increased attention has been paid to the delivery of TRP standards. Table 11. "Khasavyurtovsky District"

Dynamics of education development in municipal education

Indicators

the University of London

Seats

Children

Pre-school

Preschool

Number of pre-school educational institutions Number of age (aged 1 to 7 years) Provision of preschool institutions Number of institutions, including those located in non-standard premises, requiring major repairs

General Education

Children

years

1-6

including by years: 2015

2016

2017

12

16

18

1530

1940

2294

21174

23217

25610

8,4

54

38 16

9,7

54

37 11

12,2

55

37 12

The food is measured.

ed

Seats

cel

% of children

ed

ed

ed

20

the University of London

Daytime

Number of places in general education institutions Number of children occupying 100 places in pre-school educational institutions Number of general education institutions

Students

Average class occupancy

ed

cel

ed

cel

13169

13038

13788

172

177

176

22723

23069

24156

20

19,2

19,2

Within the framework of the implementation of the Priority Development Project of the Republic of Dagestan "Enlightened Dagestan", measures are envisaged to increase motivation to study the language, history and culture of the people. Improving the material base of teaching, increasing the responsibility of teachers for teaching results. Preservation and continuation of the traditions of the people. It is planned to increase interest in the study of the Russian language and literature, the culture of language learning and motivation for literary reading. It is planned to develop a draft program in the area, which will increase the interest of students and English language learning. The Department of Education systematically checks the implementation of the English-speaking Dagestan subprogram in the educational institutions of the district. Offices of foreign languages in technical 15 schools by communication means. 9 schools are covered by the project "School of the Future" The implementation of the project "School of the Future" is under the Ministry of Education and Science of the RD. The Department of Education of the Ministry of Education "Khasavyurtovsky district" organized work on the formation of groups of pre-school preparation of children in the educational institutions of the district.

Modern

Equipped

OU

2.11. Labour market

by area is 74925

Workforce size, in persons; of these, 52,605 people are employed in the economy. As of 1 January 2015, 3,097 people had approached the Khasavyurt District Employment Centre in search of work, of whom 2,725 had been placed in employment by the Centre. A total of 1,001 people were recognised as unemployed, of whom 933 were awarded unemployment benefit. The unemployment rate in the district was 1.6% (in the Republic of Dagestan, 2.1). The number of new jobs created in the district in 2014 was 395.

Table 13. Employment rates

Indicators

Number of resident population (average annual)

The food is measured.

thousand rubles.

Including by years:

2015

2016

2017

151,4

154,5

157,6

21

Number of labor resources Number of economically active population From them: employed in the economy of the district

Employment in the economy as a proportion of the working population

Number of officially registered unemployed at year end

Registered unemployment rate

Thousands of people

Thousands of people

Thousands of people

%

cel

%

71,56

72,19

63,52

63,65

52,08

52,23

72,7

72,3

74,9

64,0

52,6

67,0

1180

1000

1001

1,9

1,6

1,6

2.12.Culture

The administration of the district gives great

importance of culture development. The network of municipal cultural institutions has been preserved in recent years. For the organization of cultural leisure of the population in the area 98 Institutions of Culture: The Centralized Library System and Its 48 Branches, 44 cultural and leisure type institutions (of which: 31 - Village Cultural Houses (KFOR), 13- Centers of traditional culture of the peoples of Russia, children's music school 3 branches, children's art school with 5 branches, children's art school with 3 Branches, 2 collective of folk theater, ), folk ensemble "Laman-Az", vocal ensemble "Echo of Mountains", children's choreographic ensemble "Rainbow", studio of arts of national dance "Friendship", youth theater-studio, choir of amateur art. On the basis of the existing Houses of culture of Dagestan. the Centers are open Local television "Aitash", public-political weekly "Vesti" is published.

Traditional

Culture

Peoples

In the area carefully preserved folk crafts and crafts:

pottery (s. Suleukent), carpet weaving (s. Kurush), in s. Aksai tastarobletii; in p. Crush wood carvers and carpeters.

Creative teams take an active part in all festive events in the settlements of the district and beyond. Every year meetings with veterans, field events of various thematic orientations are held.

From the local budget for the repair and strengthening of the material and technical base in cultural and art institutions 2017 the Year 44,8 Millions of rubles.

V 2017 The budget of the cultural sector was more 116,6 million.

Rubles.

22

Population

In the year 2017 there were 41890 people.

Participating

Cultural and Dog

In the region, the State program "Cultural Development" is being implemented, which provides for the overhaul of the Kokrek KFOR with the installation of the film studio 3 D. Co-financing from the local budget is 225 thousand rubles.

2.13. Physical culture and sports, youth policy

When implementing social policy, special emphasis is placed on increasing the priority of work with young people. To date, special attention is paid to working with the public initiative of the younger generation, the inclusion in the active activity of as many adolescents and youth as possible through public organizations, creative associations.

At the head of the MO from among the youth of the district there is a "Council of youth", consisting of 15 man. The area operates 6 Community youth groups with more - 19 thousands of people.

In order to create conditions for increasing the social activity of young people and involving them in solving social and economic problems, the Open Youth Administration of the Khasavyurtovsky District Ministry of Defense has been created. One of the priority areas was and remains the work to involve young people in active public life, international education and generation, growing intolerance to extremism and radicalism.

Atmosphere

Conviction

The summer employment campaign for underage citizens contributes to the involvement of young people in social practice and the formation of initial working skills for adolescents. V 2014 Temporary jobs were created for 962 Teenagers.

Today, there are many young people in Khasavyurt district, citizens who have excellent organizational skills on a positive agenda, who have a strong civic position and are able to lead young people. They want to live, work, create families and raise children in the Khasavyurt district. With them, we have strong hopes for the successful, progressive development of municipal education.

Much attention is paid to the development of sports in the region. In the municipality, a course has been taken to create and develop a single sports infrastructure and youth policy. Special attention is paid to the development of physical culture and sports in the region. There are children’s sports schools in the village. Botayurt, branches of Porsukov State Art School in many villages of the district and Seitiev State Art School within the city limits. In the area - 38 the Sports Hall, 12 – Playgrounds for children, 44 – Fitness Gyms,189 - sports grounds and fields (i.e 10 fields with an artificial green coating). Sections and circles visit 8865 man. V 2017 the District Teams and Individual 23

athletes participated in all-Russian, republican, inter-district competitions and systematically climbed the high pedestal in various sports.

Proportion of the population of the area systematically engaged in physical

Culture and sport, is 38 %.

III. The main goal of the Strategy of socio-economic development of Khasavyurt municipal district for the period up to 2025 is the creation of favorable conditions for the life of the population, the development of the social sphere and sustainable economic growth.

Improving the standard of living of the population

Purpose:

1.Creating conditions for quality human life; 2.Stabilizing the population and forming prerequisites for

subsequent demographic growth;

3.Creation of conditions ensuring growth of real incomes of the population,

increase in wages and decrease in differentiation within the district.

Task: 1. Creation of conditions for increasing the population of the Ministry of Defense, first of all, by reducing the mortality rate of the population (especially children) and creating prerequisites for stabilization and subsequent growth of fertility rates.

2. Development of a system of support for young families in solving the housing problem. Formation of a system of social support and adaptation for all categories of the population. Increasing the effectiveness of state support for the family.

3. Creating conditions for the development of positive migration

processes.

4. Recovery

Reproduction,

and regulating the function of wages in the main types of economic activity, while wage growth should be accompanied by an increase in labor productivity and the creation of new jobs. 6. Improving the living conditions of the elderly and the poor by offering them a wide range of services at affordable prices.

Incentive

In agriculture

Target: 1.

competitive and sustainable agricultural production.

Municipal

Development

District

the City

2.Creating conditions for the formation of a raw material base for enterprises

food and processing industry.

4.Increase in agricultural production. market 5.Formation

Ongoing

Effectively

agricultural products and development of the infrastructure of this market.

24

6.Creating a favorable investment climate and increasing

volume of investment.

7.Promotion

Local Products

Commodity Producers

the City

The Republican Market.

Task: 1.Accelerated development of livestock (herding, sheep, -

Development of other areas of livestock

poultry). beekeeping and animal husbandry.

2. Creation of waste-free poultry complexes based on specialized technological lines for automation of production focused on deep processing

Equipped

premises,

3.Development and support of breeding-tribal work. 4.State support measures within targeted programs. 5.Support for timely implementation of anti-epizootic

activities.

6.Development of crop production:

- support of grain growing - increase in acreage, application of high-yielding varieties of grain crops; - development of rice growing - expansion of rice check areas; - development of vegetable growing - transfer of vegetable growing to the production of closed ground vegetables, construction of greenhouse complexes for growing seedlings of vegetable crops - development of fruit growing - transfer of horticulture to intensive and laying of new gardens with the aim of super-intensive types of development;

Expansion of vineyards,

-

- support of elite seed production - increase in the area planted with elite seeds to 15% from the total area of crops, bringing the area of varietal crops with regional varieties and conditioned seeds of grain crops to 100%;

7. Improvement of soil fertility, modernization of reclamation

introduction of advanced irrigation technologies,

- systems of inter-farm flood control measures of structures expansion of areas of reclaimed land;

Intra-farm reclamation

Hydrotechnical

the City

and

Systems

8.Development of effective land turnover - carrying out an inventory of agricultural land and making appropriate changes to the land balance, establishing and fixing boundary marks of agricultural land, as well as the boundaries of agricultural land plots,

The Hotel

Utilization

the University of London

25

producers, gardening societies and other land users, stage-by-stage completion of re-registration of the right to use land, producers, gardening societies and other land users, redistribution of agricultural land in the interests of the most effective economic entities

Agricultural

held

Utilization

the University of London

9.Development of the market of mechanized services and increase of the level

technical equipment.

10.Development of agro-industrial integration and agricultural

cooperation, including consumer, credit.

11.Creation of investment platforms and preparation of investment

projects and proposals.

In industry

Objective: 1.Formation of industrial complex on the basis of existing

resource and labor potential of the municipality,

2.Development of food processing industry, strengthening

to combat the import and production of counterfeit products, enterprises

3.modernization

existing

Food

Industry

Task: 1. creating economic conditions that ensure the creation and

effective development of industrial enterprises in the territory of the Ministry of Defense.

2. Creation of a network of mini-productions on processing of agricultural products and production of finished products focused on consumer demand of various groups of the population in the municipal district.

3. Development of meat and dairy production and processing

products.

4. Development of bread production, bakery and confectionery

products.

5. Creation of a favorable investment climate to attract investment in the development of industry of the municipal district.

6. Formation of a stable raw material base for processing enterprises, stimulation of farms, including farmers and personal assistants, for the supply of raw materials for processing.

7. Expansion of raw materials markets and sales of products in the region

products, including through the development of new regional markets.

8. Creating a favorable climate for the development of new industries, the production of industrial products

the University of London

Small business municipal education.

9.

Increasing consumer loyalty to food

Local production.

10.Development of the market of mechanized services.

26

11.Creation of new and promotion of existing brands 12.Promotion of local products

In construction and housing

Purpose:

1.Development

Construction

the Complex

development of services

construction, development of production of building materials.

High

1.Achievement

level of reliability and

sustainability of the municipal housing and communal complex. 2. Improving the quality of housing and communal services provided while optimizing the cost of their provision. Ensuring the availability of housing for all categories of citizens, as well as the compliance of the housing stock with modern standards of comfortable housing.

3. Improving the efficiency of fuel and energy use

resources.

Task: 1.Development of housing construction, provided with engineering and communal infrastructure of territories for housing construction. Increase in the volume of housing construction. 2.Development of mortgage housing lending. 3.Provision of residential premises of certain categories and

poor citizens.

4.Development and implementation of projects of complex development of land plots for housing construction. Land allocation for housing construction.

5.Ensuring access to social infrastructure facilities in accordance with security standards (medical and educational institutions, household services, shops, etc.). 6. Development of the market of building materials and services. 7.Development of housing and communal services provides

Construction

Drainage

(reconstruction) and modernization of networks and facilities for the construction of water supply, (reconstruction), modernization of networks and gas supply facilities, energy saving and energy efficiency in the housing stock and municipal water supply systems, water disposal and electrification of new microdistricts. Lighting systems modernization. 8. Recovery of financial debt of the population for housing services.

infrastructure.

Gasification,

Liquidation

Situations

The industry,

the University of London

9.Ensuring permanent participation of local self-government bodies

10.Analysis

in control of quality of housing and communal services. energy consumption

organizations financed from the local budget, identifying and eliminating hotbeds of irrational use of energy resources.

27

In transport, communications and road management Objective: 1.Development of a competitive transport system, maximum transport

and interregional

Republican

the University of London

Integration of space.

2. Development of the road network through:

- preservation and development of public roads of local importance due to current and major repairs; - creation of conditions for the development of the social infrastructure of the municipality; - improvement of road safety on the roads of the "Khasavyurtovsky district" MO; - improvement of the road network, roads and road structures of local importance; - provision of transport and operational indicators at the level necessary to meet the needs of road users, taking into account the priorities of socio-economic development of the Khasavyurts.

3. Meeting the needs of the population and organizations in various

types of communication due to: - increasing the level of telephony as a result of using satellite communication; - developing access to the Internet, including the development of fiber-optic communication lines; - ensuring the use of the Internet in all general educational institutions of the district, which will lead in the future to improve the quality of education and access to the latest educational technologies, regardless of the location of the student;

Task: 1. Ensuring the availability and quality of transport services for the population of the municipal district in accordance with transport standards, the organization of regular transport services for the population between all settlements of the district and the cities of the republic.

2. Maintenance, repair and construction of public roads between settlements. Maintenance of the road network of the municipality, maintenance, repair and construction of artificial structures on public roads.

3.Improving the level of road safety, reducing

Road traffic injuries.

4.Formation of passenger traffic according to the concept of development

efficient single route network.

5.Enhancing Internet access.

28

6. Development of telephone network, replacement of analog telephone

stations on digital. 7.Telephony

in remote settlements, farmers and peasant farms of the region.

Non-production facilities

In small and medium-sized enterprises, the goal: 1.Creation of the most favorable conditions for the development of small and medium-sized businesses, increase on its basis the inflow of investments, the volume of production of goods and services, tax revenues to the budget, increase the level of employment of the population of the municipal district.

Task: 1. Support under existing legislation

Development of small business entities.

2. Support for the development of small and medium-sized

medium business.

3. Creation of a municipal pledge fund. 4. Development of the system of social partnership between small and medium-sized businesses and the administration of the municipal district.

5. Information, methodological and organizational support of the population and representatives of small business on the problems of small business development.

6. Provision

Agricultural land.

For

organizations

and

Terms of reference

7. Assistance in the production and marketing of products,

activation of fair and exhibition activities.

In the consumer market Target: 1.Satisfaction of the consumer demand of the population in quality

goods and services. Task: 1.The development of retail trade provides for the construction, reconstruction and modernization of retail facilities, the development of small businesses in the consumer market, the development of consumer cooperation (opening of trading houses of local agricultural producers).

2.Development of wholesale trade

in large settlements, provides for the creation of centers of small wholesale trade, modernization of warehouse infrastructure of trade organizations, including through the construction of wholesale and logistics centers of trade, increasing the level of automation and mechanization of loading, unloading and warehouse 29

operations. Ensuring presence in trade and logistics centers of Russian regions and consolidation of sales under a single brand

3. Development and improvement of the catering network. 4. Expansion of the list of paid services provided to the population. 5. Development of the non-governmental non-profit organizations sector to provide high-quality socially significant household services to residents of the municipal district.

6. Formation of internal culture of the enterprise of trade and sphere

services.

7. Development of the domestic services market.

In the area of municipal finance, the target is 1. Ensuring the growth of own revenues of the local budget. 2. Improving the efficiency of budget expenditures. 3. Implementation of the priority development project of the Republic of Dagestan

“The economics of ‘whitewashing’.”

Task: 1. Creating conditions for increasing tax potential

Municipal education.

2. Development and implementation of a set of measures to increase the collection of taxes coming to the district budget. Organization of control over single tax payers on imputed income for certain types of activities in the field of retail trade and public services. Assistance to settlements to collect rents for land owned by the state, until the division of state ownership of land. Take measures to recover arrears on local taxes.

3. Conducting

Inventory

Creditor

Debts

C

Expired statute of limitations and taking appropriate action.

4. Increase non-tax revenues by increasing

efficient use of municipal property.

5. Carrying out measures to identify unregistered real estate objects belonging to individuals, facilitating their registration and paying property tax on individuals.

6. Optimization of budget expenditures, increasing the efficiency of spending budget funds, focus on achieving final socio-economic results.

In health care, the goal is 1.The formation of a health care system that ensures high quality of public health, prevention of premature mortality and disability.

Task:

30

Quality and

1.Promotion

Accessibility of medical care provides for the construction and reconstruction of health facilities (hospitals, clinics, dispensaries, FAPs, ambulance stations).

2. Strengthening control over the organization and quality of delivery

Medical services.

3. Preservation, restoration and promotion of children ' s health. 4. The development of the system of prevention of infectious and socially significant diseases provides for the early detection, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with socially significant diseases.

5. Implementation of the priority development project of the Republic of Dagestan

"Human capital" (subsection "Healthy Dagestan").

In education Goal: 1.Improving the availability of quality education,

meeting the requirements of innovative development of the economy, modern needs of society and every citizen

Task: 1.Expansion of the network of full-time educational institutions and children's

Pre-school institutions.

2.Strengthening and development of infrastructure of material and technical base of day and preschool educational institutions, carrying out major repairs in them. 3.Enhancing educational processes.

improvement

education,

Quality

4.Ensuring the innovative nature of the educational system, the introduction of state and

the Department of Information and Communication Technologies in Municipal Educational Institutions

children,

5. Organization of leisure activities of schoolchildren. 6.Improving the quality of staffing of the educational system, encouragement and targeted support of certain categories of teachers.

In the development of culture and tourism Goal: 1.Preservation, development and implementation of cultural and spiritual

potential of the municipality.

2.Development of tourist and recreational complex of municipal

area.

Task: 1. Formation of the cultural environment for the education of the individual. 2. Creation of optimal material and organizational conditions to ensure maximum availability of cultural goods in the field of culture and art.

31

3. Strengthening the material and technical base of cultural institutions of the municipal district, carrying out major repairs in them, improving working conditions.

4. Expansion of the network of musical and artistic institutions

Education.

5. Development of library services. 6.

Development

System

Terms and Conditions

For

Additional

education of children in the artistic and musical sphere.

7.Preservation and popularization of the cultural heritage of the municipality

district. stimulating the development of folk crafts; the creation of a school of masters.

8. Organization and holding of mass cultural events,

Participation in republican and district competitions.

9. Implementation of the priority development project of the Republic of Dagestan

"Human Capital" (subsection "Cultural Dagestan").

10.Creating conditions for attracting investments, preparation

investment sites.

11. Development of new tourist routes and excursions. 12. Development of ecological and health tourism. 13.Development of historical, ethnographic and educational tourism. 14.development of municipal television and radio broadcasting, preservation and

Development of local publications.

Physical culture and sports, youth policy Goal: 1.

healthy lifestyle of the population, creating optimal conditions, increasing accessibility for the development of mass physical culture and sports.

2.Creating conditions for successful social and effective

Self-realization of youth, development of youth potential and its use for innovative development.

3. development of youth centers. Task:

1. Expansion of the network of sports institutions and development of sports infrastructure.

2.Creation of conditions for the development of mass culture and sports, including the development of children's and youth sports, extracurricular forms of physical education and sports.

3. Strengthening the physical infrastructure

culture and sport.

4. Organization, conduct of district and participation in interdistrict and

Republican sporting events.

5. Development of the system of additional education in the field of physical culture and sports, creation of sports clubs and sections for children and adults, strengthening the material and technical base of children's sports

32

schools. Organization of a system of leisure and sports for people with limited mobility (pensioners, etc.)

6.Implementation of information policy to increase interest

citizens to engage in physical culture and sports.

7.Involvement of young people in social practice and its informing about potential opportunities for self-development, providing support for scientific, creative and entrepreneurial activity of young people.

9.Provision

8.Formation of a holistic system of support for initiative and talented youth with leadership skills. Support of educational institutions in the implementation of their own programs aimed at developing potential opportunities for self-realization, scientific, creative and entrepreneurial activity of students.

assistance to young people, development of special projects that equalize the opportunities of young people living in rural areas and remote areas in the search, application and dissemination of relevant information, ensuring the availability of information for young people about the conditions created for it and the opportunities provided by programs

10.realization

Youth

Support

Entrepreneurship.

11.Promoting effective models and forms of youth participation in the management of public life, involving young people in the activities of local bodies. Involvement of young people in innovative projects in international creative, scientific and sports associations.

education, science,

technology,

culture,

Sphere

the University of London

The goal of the labor market is 1, creating an effective functioning labor market. Task: 1.Address support for citizens moving to another area for

Permanent and temporary employment

2.Promotion of small business and self-employment

unemployed citizens.

3.Organization of training (retraining) of unemployed citizens

skills required in the market.

4.Promoting the employment of unemployed persons with disabilities, parents raising disabled children, parents with many children and other categories of citizens in need of social protection, within special programs.

5.Development and implementation of measures to improve conditions and labor protection, production, management

reducing the risk of occupational risks with the participation of the parties to the social partnership.

Injuries to Improvement

diseases,

Mortality

and

33

6.Establish and maintain a unified development information system (including a base for providing direct access)

the employer's job market to the job bank).

7. Optimizing labor supply and demand in the labor market. Implementation of a set of measures to ensure the employment of the able-bodied population.

Environment and Environmental Protection Objective: 1. Ensuring environmental safety and quality of environmental protection, creating comfortable living conditions and developing production for residents of the municipal district. Organization of secondary processing.

and

2.Stabilization

sanitary and epidemiological situation by reducing the level of negative impact of industrial waste on the environment and the population

Environmental

improvement

and

Task: 1.Solving the problem of waste disposal. Creation of municipal landfills in all settlements, organization of an enterprise for the disposal of agricultural waste, introduction of modern technologies for the export, processing and disposal of industrial waste, agriculture and household waste 2. Implementation of shore protection works. 3. Increase the level of improvement and landscaping of the municipal

Organized

District

area.

4. Regularly inform the public about the

Forest and water fund of the municipal area.

Management and use of municipal property and land:

Objective: 1.Improving the efficiency of property and land use,

owned by the municipal district.

Task: 1. Carrying out an inventory of municipal property in order to determine the composition of property that is necessary for the provision of social services and the implementation of issues of local importance.

2. ownership of land.

Completion of the process and legal

Delimitation Design

the Lands

Municipal Law Levels

3. Intensification of the identification of self-occupying land and

Take appropriate action.

4. Regular monitoring of the implementation of the terms and conditions of agricultural land leases and measures

34

increase the efficiency of their use, up to the forced withdrawal.

5. Control over the completeness and timeliness of payment of rent for the use of municipal property, repayment of the resulting debt for the use of land.

Interaction with rural settlements Goal: 1. Improving the interaction and coordination of the work of local self-government bodies of the municipal district with local self-government bodies of rural settlements.

2. Reducing disparities in socio-economic development

rural settlements. Tasks: 1. Promote the creation of a rural property complex

settlements.

2. Creating conditions for the effective use of land

resources.

3. Creation of conditions for the development of “growth points” in rural settlements, promotion of investment projects, development of small business, organization of employment.

The main indicators of the level of socio-economic development of the Khasavyurt municipal district up to 2025 (Appendix 1)

V. Volumes and sources of financing of activities under the Strategy of Khasavyurt municipal district up to 2025 (Appendix 2)

The overall need for financial resources to implement the Strategy 2019-2025 The amount is estimated 21912,4 Millions of rubles, including 5506,64 million rubles from the federal budget, 2016,65 million rubles - from the republican budget of the Republic of Dagestan, 152,6million rubles - from the municipal budget of the MO "Khasavyurtovsky district", extra-budgetary funds – 1423,6 million rubles.

The volume of necessary financial is determined on the basis of design and estimate documentation for the construction and reconstruction of industrial and social facilities, events of sectoral republican target programs providing for financing the construction of the territory of the Ministry of Defense "Khasavyurtovsky district", feasibility studies and business plans of investment projects, preliminary calculations of the necessary costs for the proposed construction of facilities.

Reconstruction

objects

the City

and

The participation of the federal budget in the investment of program activities is expected within the framework of existing and developing

35

federal target programs and other items of the federal budget. These funds are intended mainly for the implementation of measures in the social and utility sector and for subsidizing part of interest rates on investment projects.

Loans attracted

For

The funds of the republican budget of the RD are supposed to be allocated for the implementation of the action plan of the Strategy included in the existing and developing republican target programs, for the construction of industrial infrastructure facilities, subsidizing part of the interest rate on loans attracted for the implementation of investment projects.

Communal

Social

areas,

and

The main areas of use of the municipal budget are: measures for the development of agriculture, education, housing and communal services, sports, small and medium-sized businesses and culture.

RD

Funds

Volumes

Federally,

Republican

and the municipal budget of the Ministry of Defense "Khasavyurtovsky District", directed to finance the action plan of the Strategy, are subject to annual clarification when adopting the relevant budgets for the next year and planning period. Financial

It is planned to direct sources to the implementation of investment projects in the agro-industrial complex, industry, tourism, as well as housing construction. This category includes own funds of enterprises and organizations, bank loans, funds of the population and others.

Extrabudgetary

Funds

account

the National Park

Volumes and sources of financing of the Strategy in the areas of

In the context of activities and by year are given in appendix No. 2 to the Strategy.

Head of Economic Department A.Kazakov

36

R E S E N E

Project:

from 27 December 2018 No 21-VI SD

Strategy of social and economic development of Khasavyurt municipal district for the period up to 2025

In accordance with Articles 25 and 30 of the Statute of the Municipal

education "Khasavyurtovsky district",

Assembly of Municipal District Deputies

SOLUTION:

Approve

1. development of Khasavyurt municipal district for the period up to 2025 (attached).

socio-economic

Strategy

2.Require the executive bodies of the municipal district to ensure the implementation of indicators (indicators) provided for by the Strategy of the municipal district for the period up to 2025.

socio-economic

Khasavyurtovsky

Development

3.This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Chairman of the Assembly of Deputies M. Akhaev

37

Letter of agreement

Agenda issues at the 21 session of the Assembly of Deputies

Municipal Formation "Khasavyurtovsky District"

Strategy of social and economic development of Khasavyurt municipal district for the period up to 2025

Agreed: Acting head of the municipal district

______________ Botashev Z.G. "_____"______________2018

Agreed: Head of Legal Department

_____________ A.Zagirov "_____"______________2018 g.

38

Report on the 21 session of the Assembly of Deputies of the Ministry of Defense "Khasavyurtovsky District" "On the Strategy of Socio-Economic Development of the Khasavyurtovsky Municipal District for the Period up to 2025"

Dear members, members and guests!

A socio-economic strategy is presented to you.

development of Khasavyurt municipal district for the period up to 2025.

Strategy

Present

Development of Khasavyurt municipal district for the period up to 2025, which is a basic document that defines long-term goals and priorities, tasks, as well as the main directions of economic and social development of the municipal district.

socio-economic

The strategy addresses the following issues:

1. Consolidation of all members of the community

solutions to key problems.

2. Coordination of the process of strategic management of the district. 3. Increase the investment attractiveness of the area. The strategy consists of 5 sections, on 46 printed sheets.

1 section are reflected : scheme of territorial planning, the main content and characteristics of the area; 2 section - analysis of the socio-economic situation and main directions of development of the municipal formation "Khasavyurtovsky district" by industries 2015-2017 years; 3 section - the main goals and objectives of the Strategy; 4 section - the main indicators of the level of socio-economic development of the Khasavyurt municipal district 2025 years; 5 section - volumes and sources of financing of activities under the Strategy of the Khasavyurt municipal district 2025 years.

The strategy was developed by the Economic Department of the Khasavyurt district administration in accordance with the tasks and principles emanating from the Strategy of Social and Economic Development of the Republic of Dagestan and taking into account the development of economic entities located in the district. The basis for the formation of forecast parameters is for the previous period, calculations submitted to the Ministry of Economy for the development of the social infrastructure of the district.

Economics

Trends

Development

District

analysis

The material is voluminous and consists of 36 sheets of text and 2 applications in

tabular form.

Social development of municipal education is characterized by education,

demographic health, culture, sports, as well as the standard of living of the population.

indicators,

Status

Sphere

The area with a relatively high birth rate. On 1000 Population is born 22,6 children (according to RD, this indicator – 16,4).

39

The expected average annual population of the district by 2025 is 178400 people. In improving the standard of living of the population, the main task:

1. Creating conditions for increasing the population of the Ministry of Defense

Reducing the mortality rate (especially child mortality.) 2. Development of a system of support for young families in solving the housing problem. Formation of a system of social support and adaptation for all categories of the population. Improving the efficiency of state support for the family. 3. Recovery

Wage growth and the regulatory role of wages in core economic activities must be accompanied by productivity growth and job creation. The average monthly wage per employee by 2025 will increase by 56 % and will amount to 31837 rubles. 4. Improving the living conditions of the elderly and the poor by offering them a wide range of services at affordable prices.

Reproduction,

Incentive

Education is one of the key units of the sphere

Municipal education. Its main components are children's preschools, day general education schools, the system of additional education of children, boarding school for children with disabilities.

To achieve the estimated level of population security

Education services required: 1. Design and construction of pre-school institutions in rural settlements of the municipal district.

Number

Children

Preschool

Age

amounts to

25610

man. Percentage of children aged 3 - 7 The number of years that pre-school services have been available to 01.10.2018 years – 20,0%. Level of availability of preschool institutions for children 1-6 Years in the area – 9,7 %. V 30 from 42 Rural municipalities lack pre-school facilities.

In the planned 2019-2025 It is necessary to start the construction of kindergartens in 12 Rural areas with total number of places 1900: Botayurt – 160 places, Bayramaul – 140 Places, Mutsalaul – 180 places, Pervomayskoe – 120 places, Sivukh – 140 Locations, Endiray – 140 places, Temiraul – 140 Places,Kurush – 220 places, Botashyurt - 160 places, Pokrovskoe – 180 Places, Osmanurt – 180 places, Karlanyurt -140 Seats. 2. Design and construction of general education institutions

From 54 Schools in one shift is the educational process in 4 schools, in 2 Changeover 41 SSH, in 3 Changeover 9 SSH. The percentage of physical wear and tear taking into account major repairs is 100 % in 27 SSH.

Level of security

Student places from the standard is on the district 71 %. Additional need - 6473 student places.

40

On 2019-2025 years to complete the planned design and construction of schools in settlements: an extension to the school in the village of Kostek 200 School places, schools on 300 ed.m. in Terechnoe village, on 300 in Kandouraul village, on 120 In the village of Kemsiurt, on 300 M. in s.Andyray,502 Locations in Hamavyurt, 120 student places in Akbulaturt village, 705 student places in Novo-Kostek village. .+ Aksai The need to build schools in such settlements, where the level of provision of student places is lower 70%: village Aksai, Sivukh, Five-year-old,Novosasitli.

In health care, due to the growth of the population, the problem of beds has worsened. The provision of beds for 10 thousand of the population is -30,3, which is 2 times lower than the average republican indicator (according to RD-64,7).

Hospitals

Status

C

For the years 2019-2025 it is indicated:

- completion of the construction of the district hospital for 260 beds in the village of Botayurt; - reconstruction of the building d/s "Solnyshko" for the district clinic in the city of Khasavurt; -construction of a medical outpatient clinic in the village of Mutsalaul, Toturbiykal, Novogatli; -construction of felsher-obsher points in the village.

In the field of culture: construction of KFOR in Kostek and reconstruction of existing cultural objects, strengthening the material and technical base of cultural objects.

In the development of physical culture and sports: construction and

The existing facilities,

reconstruction of the operation of physical culture and health complexes.

Construction and

input

Accessible environment - the formation of a modern urban environment on the territory of 10 settlements of the district with the creation of 25 objects (parks, sports grounds, park areas, street improvement).

The implementation mechanism of the Strategy will ensure the achievement of the goals and objectives of the Strategy

targets in the economy. In the agro-industrial complex, the purpose of municipal agricultural production of livestock and crop production.

District

Competitively for

- Development of

the Sustainable Development Account

and

In crop production:

Grain Farming

by increasing the area of cultivation,

-support the use of high-yielding varieties of grain crops; -development of rice farming -expansion of rice check areas; -development of vegetable growing -transfer of vegetable growing to the production of closed ground vegetables, construction of greenhouse complexes; transfer of horticulture to intensive and -development of fruit growing -superintensive types of development, laying new gardens in order to improve the structure and range of plantings, the introduction of advanced technologies of cultivation; 41

-

Expansion of vineyards,

- development of viticulture, the use of new environmentally friendly and natural technologies to increase yields, increasing the area for table grapes; - development of the market of mechanized services and increasing the level of technical equipment. In general, the volume of financing for the development of the agro-industrial complex will be 1738,2 million rubles. The volume of agricultural production in all categories of farms is 11807 million rubles.

Volume of shipped industrial products (works, services) to 2025 Mr. will – 73,2 million rubles, the amount of financing of the activities of the Strategy – 7120 million rubles.

Investments

All sources of financing will be directed mainly to the development of rural settlements infrastructure.

in fixed assets

account

the National Park

Continue

investments

the City

water supply,

water disposal,

Electrification Road Economy

The implementation of the goals and objectives of the Strategy will be carried out at the expense of funding sources from the federal, republican, local budgets and extra-budgetary funds.

The overall need for financial resources to implement the Strategy 2019-2025 The amount is estimated 21912,4 Millions of rubles, including 5506,64 million rubles from the federal budget, 2016,65 million rubles - from the republican budget of the Republic of Dagestan, 152,6million rubles - from the municipal budget of the MO "Khasavyurtovsky district", extra-budgetary funds – 1423,6 million rubles.

Head of Economic Department A.Kazakov

42

Project materials · Full published text

Government Order of 20 March 2025

Source status: archive

The order of the Government of the Russian Federation is the regulatory context of project initiatives.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/rasporyazhenie-pravitelstva-ot-20-marta-2025.html

Open on the site

GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

R A S P O R J E N E

from 20 March 2025 No 647-r

MOSCOW

V

with part 2

Conform

Article 7

the Law of Ukraine 28 November 2018 № 457-FZ About modification of the Budget code of the Russian Federation and separate legislative acts of the Russian Federation" to approve the attached changes which are made in distribution of subsidies to budgets of subjects of the Russian Federation for the purpose of creation of network of scientific and production centers of tests and competences in the field of development of technologies of unmanned aerial systems on 2025 year and for the planning period 2026 and 2027 years approved by the annex 31 (table 61) Federal Law on the Federal Budget 2025 year and for the planning period 2026 and 2027 years".

Prime Minister of the Russian Federation

M. Mishustin

0437795-Uch-2025 (4.0)

Approved by the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 20 March 2025 No 647-r

and I,

which are included in the distribution of subsidies to the budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in order to create a network of research and production centers of tests and competencies in the field of development of technologies of unmanned aircraft systems in 2025 year and for the planning period 2026 and 2027 years approved by the annex 31 (table 61) Federal Law on the Federal Budget 2025 year and for the planning period 2026 and 2027 years"

Name of the subject of the Russian Federation

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

(thousands of rubles)

Republic of Bashkortostan

Buryat Republic

-

-

2617980,2

1460047,3

Kabardino-Balkar Republic

518294,5

Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)

554834,1

-

-

Republic of Tatarstan

Udmurt Republic

Perm Krai

Kaluga Region

Moscow Region

Nizhny Novgorod Region

Novgorod Region

Novosibirsk Region

Orenburg Region

Ryazan Region

-

-

2002782,5

1281293,8

552847,4

-

-

828768,5

494563,3

-

375673,1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2637896,2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2563015,3

2131266,6

-

-

985775,1

-

-

0437795-Uch-2025 (4.0)

2

Name of the subject of the Russian Federation

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

Tula region

Yaroslavl region

Total

678494,6

-

-

-

-

1389943

4003475,5

10000000

7070000

___________

0437795-Uch-2025 (4.0)

Project materials · Full published text

Strategy 2030 (26 October)

Source status: archive

Strategy 2030 is the reference context for development programmes.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/strategija-2030-26-oktyabrya.html

Open on the site

S T R A T E G I

SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN FOR THE PERIOD TO 2030 YEARS

MAHACHACKALA - 2021

1

LIST OF EXECUTORS

Full name, basic information

Work accomplished

Signatures

Fadik Kurbanovich Mugulov is the Executive Director of Interregional Center for Ex-Pertiza and Evaluation "Golden Pro-portion", a member of the Working Group on the Development of Strategy-2030 of Dagestan.

Structure of the Strategy. General provisions. Sections: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Appendices: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Title-page design. Overall editing of the Strategy.

Mair Eminbekovich Pashayev is the head of the project and resource development office of the territory, a member of the Working Group on the Development of Strategy-2030 of the Dagestan Republic.

Structure of the Strategy. Sections: 1.4, 2, 3, 4. Annexes: 7. Coordination of the project with the Government of RD and municipalities. General edition of the Strategy.

Reviewers

____________________ (signature, date)

____________________ (signature, date)

_____________________ (signature, date)

_____________________ (signature, date)

_____________________ (signature, date)

_____________________ (signature, date)

2

GENERAL PROVISIONS

CONTENTS

I. MAIN RESULTS OF STRATEGIC ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL-ECO-NOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN

1.1. Brief description of the Republic of Dagestan 1.1.1. Economic and geographical characteristics. 1.1.2. Administrative-territorial division and historical and cultural features of the region.

1.2. Social and economic development of the Republic of Dagestan 2010-2020Gov 1.2.1. Macroeconomic dynamics and separate indicators of the efficiency of functioning of the region's economy. 1.2.2. Human Potential and Social Development. Integral assessment of the quality of life of the population. 1.2.3. Development of basic sectors of economy. 1.2.4. Spatial development and preferential territories. 1.2.5. State of the environment. 1.2.6. A brief assessment of the effectiveness of the implementation of the main federal and regional strategic documents and state programs in the republic. 1.2.7. Features of the modern stage of socio-economic development of the republic - stage, type, technological basis. 1.2.8. Stage of the life cycle of the Republic of Dagestan.

1.3. The place of the Republic of Dagestan in the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation and the North Caucasus Federal District

1.4. Key factors and opportunities for the development of the Republic of Dagestan 1.4.1. Domestic potential of socio-economic development. 1.4.2. Major imbalances and imbalances in development. 1.4.3. Utilization of existing and creation of new advantages. 1.4.4. Opportunities for Accelerating Economic Growth.

II. STRATEGIC TREATMENT

2.1. Mission of the Republic of Dagestan 2.2. Scenarios of Social and Economic Development of the Republic of Dagestan 2021-2030Gov 2.3. Strategic priorities, goals and objectives of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan 2.3.1. Goal-setting system Strategy. 2.3.2. Breakthrough projects and key tasks. 2.4. Stages of implementation of the Strategy and expected key results of achieving strategic goals

3

III. STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS OF INTEGRATED SOCIAL-ECONO-MIC DEVELOPMENT: GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES

3.1. Human development and social protection systems 3.1.1. Improving demographic processes and population growth. 3.1.2. Creation of a modern health system. 3.1.3. Improving the quality and accessibility of education, development of regional science. 3.1.4. Employment generation, income generation and poverty reduction. 3.1.5. Social protection of population. 3.1.6. Culture, youth policy and education of the younger generation. 3.1.7. Sports and popularization of physical culture. 3.1.8. Public security and the rule of law.

3.2. Modern infrastructure for life and activity 3.2.1. Complex development of settlements and improvement of living conditions of citizens. 3.2.2. Ensuring the regulatory status and guarantee mode of operation of the infrastructure. 3.2.3. Effective TCO management system and use of secondary resources.

3.3. Structural changes, modernization of industries and economic complexes 3.3.1. Prospective economic specialization of the Republic of Dagestan. 3.3.2. Modernization and development of industries. 3.3.3. Development of investment complex. 3.3.4. Modern tourism industry. 3.3.5. Ahead of Small and Medium Business Development. 3.3,.6. Development of interregional and foreign economic relations.

3.4. Balanced spatial development and sustainable ecology 3.4.1. Development of priority geostrategic territory of the Russian Federation. 3.4.2. Promising centers of economic growth. 3.4.3. Development of Makhachkala agglomeration. 3.4.4. Complex development of the historical settlement of the Russian Federation of Derbent. 3.4.5. Sustainable Ecology and Conservation of Biosystems.

3.5. Scientific and technological progress and the digital economy 3.5.1. Improving the level and effectiveness of science development. 3.5.2. Formation of the scientific and technological base of the "new economy". 3.5.3. Integration into the global information environment. 3.5.4. Digital Development Platforms.

3.6. Social capital and civil society development 3.6.1. Development of public institutions and civil society. 3.6.2. National and interfaith policies. 3.6.3. Patriotic education of citizens and preservation of identity.

4

IV. ORGANIZATIONAL-ECONOMIC MECHANISM, RESOURCE SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT MODEL OF STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION.

4.1. Institutional changes 4.1.1. System of program and planning documents on development management of the Republic of Dagestan. 4.1.2. Improving the efficiency of public and municipal administration. 4.1.3. Improvement of personnel policy. 4.1.4. Improving the effectiveness of political and legal institutions. 4.1.5. Ensuring the development of a competitive market environment in the economy. 4.1.6. Formation of institutional forms of implementation of the Strategy.

4.2. Investment and financial and budgetary model of Strategy 4.2.1. Investment strategy. 4.2.2. Development of investment complex. 4.2.3. Development of budget and financial sphere.

4.3. Improving the efficiency of management of state and municipal property 4.3.1. Improving the management of land and other natural resources 4.3.2. Improving the efficiency of management of state and municipal property

4.4. Strategy Management System

4.5. Proposals for the composition of strategic projects

V. INDICATORS AND EXPECTED RESULTS OF STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION.

MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS.

ANNEXES. 1. Regulatory framework. 2. Tables. 3. SWOT- and PEST - analysis of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan for the period up to 2030 years. 4. Industries (clusters) of perspective specialization of economy of the Republic of Dagestan. 5. the Forecast Balance of Electricity of the Republic of Dagestan 2021- 2026 Gov. 6. Objects of transport infrastructure development. 7. State unitary enterprises, joint-stock companies with 100 % shares of the Republic of Dagestan in the authorized capital or participation of the Republic of Dagestan in the authorized capital 8. Register of investment projects of the Republic of Dagestan. 9. List of state programs of the Republic of Dagestan for the implementation of the Strategy.

5

GENERAL PROVISIONS

The Strategy for the Socioeconomic Development of the Republic of Dagestan through 2030 (hereinafter the Strategy or Strategy-2030) is a strategic planning document of the Republic of Dagestan, developed as part of goal-setting in accordance with Article 75 of the republic’s Constitution, the decision of the Head of the Republic of Dagestan, S. A. Melikov, and Order No. 160-р of the Government of the Republic of Dagestan dated 4 May 2021. The Strategy was prepared in the year of the 100th anniversary of the formation of the Dagestan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic within the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic. It sets out a future vision for the republic whose realisation will strengthen Dagestan’s standing as a constituent entity of the Russian Federation, ensure accelerated development of its economy and social sphere, and substantially improve citizens’ quality of life. The Strategy forms part of the overall vertically integrated system of documents for strategic planning and forecasting the region’s long-term socioeconomic development. The need for it arises from: the republic’s difficult situation following prolonged stagnation and the scale of accumulated unresolved socioeconomic problems; preparation of socioeconomic development strategies for the Russian Federation through 2030 and the North Caucasus Federal District through 2035; changes in the conditions and progress of implementing the socioeconomic development strategies of Dagestan through 2025 and the North Caucasus Federal District through 2025; and the current results of implementing regional and federal projects and programmes for medium- and long-term development within the republic. The Strategy defines Dagestan’s socioeconomic development priorities, goals, objectives and directions in alignment with those of the Russian Federation. It provides a long-term basis for cooperation among Dagestan’s public authorities, population, civic organisations and businesses and for regional management decisions, ensuring long-term coordination between the republic’s public authorities and local government bodies. The legal and regulatory basis for its development comprises: the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Constitution of the Republic of Dagestan; Federal Law No. 172-ФЗ of 28 June 2014, “On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation”, and Republic of Dagestan Law No. 72 of 05 December 2016, “On Strategic Planning in the Republic of Dagestan”; the Methodological Recommendations for Developing and Adjusting a Socioeconomic Development Strategy for a Constituent Entity of the Russian Federation and an Action Plan for Its Implementation, approved by Order No. 132 of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation dated 23 March 2017, “On Approval of the Methodological Recommendations for Developing and Adjusting a Socioeconomic Development Strategy for a Constituent Entity of the Russian Federation and an Action Plan for Its Implementation”; and an extensive set of other federal and regional legislative and regulatory documents in this field, the principal ones being listed in Appendix 1 to the Strategy. The information base used in preparing the Strategy included statistical data from the Federal State Statistics Service and its territorial office for the Republic of Dagestan;

6

departmental information on the development of the republic’s economic sectors; development plans of leading enterprises; best practices in public administration in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation; expert assessments and national rankings; and academic and practical work on the strategic management of regional development in the Russian Federation. Preparation of the document included a strategic study of Dagestan’s socioeconomic position, an analysis of its development results mainly for 2010–2020, and an assessment of changes in the attractiveness and competitiveness of the region and individual municipalities. Long-term strategic development goals and objectives were formulated, with targets for their achievement; priority infrastructure and sectoral complexes and new economic sectors were identified, along with economic and management models for implementing and resourcing the Strategy, lists of the republic’s state programmes, and major investment projects. The conceptual provisions and content of individual sections were refined through close dialogue with Dagestan’s ministries and departments, and progress was reported periodically at various meetings of the republic’s executive authorities (ОИВ РД). The results were presented to the public and discussed with representatives of civic associations and social groups, universities, enterprises and other regional organisations. The Strategy was developed using economic and mathematical analysis and forecasting, PEST and SWOT analyses, scenario forecasting, Foresight and expert assessment methods, and modern information technologies. The Strategy is the foundational document for Dagestan’s long-term development, aimed at ensuring a decent quality of life, sustained growth in economic potential, more efficient economic reproduction processes and greater competitiveness of the republic’s economy. It will be implemented in accordance with the Action Plan for Implementing the Strategy for the Socioeconomic Development of the Republic of Dagestan through 2030. Within the strategic planning system, it is complemented by the main implementation instruments: Dagestan’s state programmes, containing specific, resourced measures to achieve the Strategy’s goals, and the republic’s Territorial Planning Scheme. The Strategy proceeds from Dagestan’s status as a priority geostrategic territory and is linked to the main state support instruments for territorial socioeconomic development: the Russian Federation’s national projects, the state programme “Development of the North Caucasus Federal District”, and measures in the draft Unified Plan for Achieving the Russian Federation’s National Development Goals through 2024 and for the planning period through 2030. It takes account of the current state, development trends and prospects of the economy, infrastructure, social sphere and human capital in Dagestan and the Russian Federation, as well as those of the global economy. In determining priority directions, major projects of regional and interregional significance were considered, together with systemic tasks for changing the region’s institutional environment. At the same time, developing Dagestan’s Strategy-2030 was significantly complicated by the absence of socioeconomic development strategies for the Russian Federation and the North Caucasus Federal District through 2030.

7

The strategy focuses on the transition of the Republic of Dagestan to a new stage of development, based on the principles of advanced development and complex solution of the challenges facing the republic, including sectoral, spatial and environmental, as well as on creating conditions for reformatting the life and activities of people based on new information and digital technologies. The strategy is based on the basic principle: the development of the Republic of Dagestan should be aimed at ensuring a decent standard of living and harmonious human development. This implies the preservation and enhancement of human potential: qualitative changes in demographic processes in the republic, in the fields of education, medicine, culture, information, environment and ecology, etc. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure a balanced spatial development and advanced development of the basic sectors of the region’s economy based on innovation, advanced modern technologies and equipment, as well as using the natural geographical and domestic advantages of the region and advantages in traditional specialization sectors that have not yet exhausted their potential. The Republic of Dagestan has favorable conditions for the development of the agro-industrial complex, the extractive and processing sectors of industry, electricity, tourism, the sanatorium and resort sector, as well as transport and logistics and transit functions of the region, further capacity building of education, health care, trade and paid services. In accordance with the goals set in the Strategy: - the assessment of the state and the most important prerequisites for the development of the economy of Dagestan are determined; - the socio-economic mission of the republic for the long-term perspective is formulated; - the main goal and goals of the first and subsequent levels, priority directions of the long-term development of the Republic of Dagestan are determined and justified, taking into account the general priorities of the development of the Russian Federation and the North Caucasus Federal District; - the most important external and internal factors are described 2030 The objectives, priorities, target indicators, mechanisms for the development of the main sectors of the economy, the social sphere, science and technology are defined; proposals are made to improve the territorial structure of the economy, taking into account the trends in the socio-economic development of cities and districts, as well as the emergence of new forms of spatial organization of the economy, reflecting the qualitative content and quantitative parameters of interregional ties in the North Caucasus and beyond in the long term; the main directions of reforming the system of state administration are defined. The strategy is designed to: - conduct effective economic policy and develop a mutually agreed upon at the regional and federal levels of power a set of measures aimed at sustainable and advanced socio-economic development of the republic; - ensure joint actions and search for partnership items of state bodies, municipalities, commercial and non-profit organizations, including public, citizens and their associations.

8

The implementation of the main provisions of the Strategy will allow: - to reverse negative trends in the economy and social sphere of the Republic of Dagestan; - to significantly increase the potential of the economic base of the republic, to ensure its competitiveness for the long term and to achieve a stable trajectory of advanced growth and development; - to increase the efficiency of state and municipal management of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan, the potential and opportunities of business and civil society. All this will be the key to the growth of the quality of life and well-being of the population of the republic and fully corresponds to the achievement of national goals envisaged by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 21.07.2020 No. 474 "On the national development goals of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030". The draft Strategy for Social and Economic Development of the Republic of Dagestan for the period up to 2030 was developed in accordance with the instructions and proposals of the Head of the Dagestan Res-public, in close cooperation with the Government of the Republic of Dagestan, relevant committees of the People's Assembly of the Republic of Dagestan, ministries, departments and municipalities of the republic.

9

I. KEY RESULTS OF STRATEGIC ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL AND

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN

1.1. Brief description of the Republic of Dagestan

1.1.1. Economic and geographical characteristics

The Republic of Dagestan is the southernmost region of the Russian Federation, is one of the oldest and richest historical regions of the country, occupies a favorable geostrategic position and has a direct access to international sea routes, through its territory there are railway, road, air, sea and pipeline routes of federal and international importance. The Republic of Dagestan borders by land and sea with five states - Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Iran. The area from south to north is about 400 km, from west to east 200 km.

The total area of the Republic of Dagestan 1 January 2020 He is 50,3 thousand square kilometres. In the structure of the lands of the republic, agricultural land is 86,4% (4344,5 thousands of hectares), land settlements 3,2% (160,5 thousands of hectares), industrial land and other special purpose 0,9% (43,3 thousands of hectares), lands of specially protected natural areas 0,6% (28,7 thousand hectares), forest fund land 8,4% (421,6 thousands of hectares), water fund lands 0,48% (26,6 Thousands of hectares of land stock 0,02% (1,8 Thousands of hectares), outside the administrative boundaries of the republic are used 158,6 thousand ha. Dagestan, a small land republic, but with a variety of soil and vegetation cover.

10

According to the variety of plant and climatic zones, Dagestan has no equal in Russia: from subtropical forest at the mouth of the Samur River, deserts and semi-deserts in the north of the republic, to high-mountain pastures and glaciers. The rich and diverse animal world of the republic: 89 Mammalian Species, 300 species of birds and 92 species of fish, including sturgeons. In general, the climate of Dagestan is characterized as dry and semi-dry, moderately continental. The climate in the north and in the central part of Dagestan is moderately continental and arid, in the south along the Caspian Sea and on the Caspian lowland subtropical semi-dry. In the mountains above 3 thousand m absolute maximum temperatures are 21-23°C, In the north, the air temperature can be higher 40°C. Precipitation at the lowlands does not exceed 400 And in the mountains at the height 3 Thousands of miles more 1 thousand mm. Dagestan has an extensive hydrographic network, represented by rivers, canals, lakes, swamps, the Caspian Sea, glaciers. There is total in the Republic 4374 Rivers, total length 25973 Kilomile. 92% The river is in the mountains, and 8% It is found in the mountains and plains. The largest rivers are the Terek, Sulak and Samur with tributaries. Long-term annual flow of the rivers of Dagestan reaches 16,2 Kilomile3/year. With an average multi-year water 16,2 Kilomile3/year, for one resident of Dagestan 7795 m3 the highest availability of fresh water in Russia, but the main disadvantage is that it is not equally distributed across the territory. The mountain and foothill areas are most provided with water. Rivers are widely used in the national economy of the republic for hydropower construction, reclamation and water supply. Hydropower potential of the republic is 55,2 billion KW/h or almost 40% potential of the North Caucasus rivers. Economically highly efficient part of them is concentrated mainly in the basins of four major rivers of Dagestan - Sulak, Samur, Avar and Andi Koisu. The Sulak River accounts for half of all hydropower here are located Chiryurtovskaya and Chirkeiskaya HPP. Dagestan resources, operating hydroelectric power plants (17 The HSE is only about 10% Hydropower of the Republic. The largest reservoirs of Dagestan - Chirkei, Irganay, Miatlin, Chiryurtov and Gergebil, are located in the foothills. The largest water reservoir in the whole North Caucasus in the mountains is the Chirkei reservoir with a full volume 2,8 billion m3 and useful1,3 billion m3. The area of his mirror 42 Kilomile2. The natural river network is thickened by an artificial one, represented by a number of irrigation channels. In Dagestan there are about 100 Lakes, total area of more 150 Kilomile2. Lakes of the Primorsky lowland (Akkol, Big and Small Turali, Aji) of lagoon-sea origin, salty, at the bottom contain therapeutic mud, which is a potential for mud treatment. Large lakes of the low part of Dagestan are Temirgo lakes, key ornithological territories, according to a number of characteristics corresponding to the Ramsar Convention. In Mountainous Dagestan, the largest, including in the entire North Caucasus, is the Great Trout Lake. Length of the lake 3,8 km, width 1,1 km, depth 320-436 m. The nature around all mountain and high-mountainous lakes is unusually picturesque and recreation centers can be created on some lakes of High-mountainous and Mountainous Dagestan. The most important hydrological element of Dagestan is the Caspian Sea, located at the junction of Europe and Asia. The level of the Caspian Sea-lake lies far below the level of the World Ocean. In the beginning 2000 The year he had a mark about -27 Abs. m. Average and maximum depth 208 and 1025 M respectively. The length of the sea shoreline varies from 6400 to 6800 km: within the boundaries of Dagestan is located near 8,5% their total length. The Caspian Sea is the most important fishing basin of the country.

11

The biological resources of the Caspian Sea include world stocks of rare and valuable sturgeon species. It contains 70% of the world’s sturgeon stocks and more than 60% of the larger non-sturgeon commercial fish stocks. The Caspian coastline within Dagestan is more than 540 km long. The republic is rich in mineral resources: oil, gas, peat, lignite and oil shale, as well as solid mineral raw materials (ferrous and non-ferrous metal ores, non-metallic mineral raw materials, etc.). Potential oil and gas reserves amount to 509.3 million tonnes of oil including gas condensate, of which 169.3 million tonnes are onshore; and 877.2 billion cubic metres of natural gas, of which 337.2 billion cubic metres are onshore. The Caspian shelf offers an important reserve for increasing hydrocarbon reserves and production. The republic has substantial reserves of building materials: limestone, marl, gravel, sand and clay. Southern Dagestan has a copper deposit whose exploitable reserves are estimated at 60,953.6 thousand tonnes of copper-pyrite ores and 3,428.3 thousand tonnes of zinc-pyrite ores. Dagestan has 255 identified springs and 15 deposits of medicinal mineral waters: carbonated, sulphide, bromide, iodine-bromine, siliceous, iron-bearing and low-radon waters.

1.1.2. Administrative-territorial division and historical-

cultural characteristics of the region.

Daghestan 2021 the Year of the Prophet 100 years of its modern state, which originates in the 1920 The year when 13 November At the first congress of the peoples of Dagestan, the autonomy of Dagestan was proclaimed. Then 20 January 1921 A decree of the VTsIK was announced on the formation of the Dagestan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. Later 70 years, in 1991 It was renamed first to the Dagestan SSR (17 September), the Republic of Dagestan (17 December). In the territory of the republic are formed 41 Municipal area and 10 urban districts. The Republic of Dagestan is the largest by population (3,13 Millions of people) and second largest (50,3 thousands of square kilometers) in the North Caucasus. The average population density is 62,2 per square kilometre (5- the place in the NCFD and 13- the place in the Russian Federation). However, the area is very unevenly populated. The largest part of the population is concentrated in the flat part of Dagestan, the north and highlands are extremely sparsely populated. The majority of the population of the republic are rural residents (about 54%). Representatives of the Republic live above 30 Indigenous peoples, more 110 ethnic groups with independent languages and dialects, culture and rich traditions. The peoples of Dagestan speak languages belonging to three large language families: Iberian-Caucasian (North Caucasian), Altaic and Indo-European. According to the Constitution of the Republic of Dagestan, the state languages are Russian and the languages of all peoples inhabiting the republic. Among them, the most common are Avar, Agul, Azerbaijani, Dargin, Kumyk, Lak, Lezgin, Nogai, Rutul, Tabasaran, Tat, Tsakhur, Chechen languages. The most numerous nationalities according to the All-Russian Population Census 2010 Years are: Avars (29,4%), Dargins (17%), Kumyks (14,9%), Lezgins (13,3%), Lacca (5,6%), Azerbaijanis (4,5%), Tabasarans (4,1%), Russian (3,6%), Chechens (3,2%), Nogais (1,4%), Rutulians (1%), Agula (1%), Tsakhura (0,3%). Their share is 98,8% population, the rest of the population is from several hundred to several people.

12

Dagestan is a cultural and ethnographic phenomenon in which a historically formed diversity of peoples’ cultures and traditions combines with a rich history as one of the ancient spiritual centres cultivating and spreading the world’s Abrahamic religions: Islam, Christianity and Judaism. Since ancient times, Dagestan has been called both the Land of Mountains and a “mountain of languages”. Its complex history is undoubtedly a factor in its ethnic diversity. Geographically part of Western Asia, it became, in remote antiquity, a meeting ground for different cultures: the agricultural civilisation of Mesopotamia and the nomadic Great Steppe, the Hellenistic world and the Roman Empire, Parthia and Sasanian Iran, the Muslim East and Orthodox Byzantium. Reminders of Dagestan’s rich and complex historical destiny as the “heart of Eurasia” include more than 6 thousand historical and cultural monuments, of which 132 are of federal significance, and the museum city of Derbent, Russia’s oldest settlement, with a history spanning 5 millennia. It contains the UNESCO-recognised Naryn-Kala citadel (fifth century), the Great Caucasian Wall of Dag-Bary with remnants of towers (sixth century), the mausoleum of the khans (eighth century) and the country’s oldest mosque (eighth century). Equally renowned historical monuments include the Armenian Church of St Grigoris in Nyugdi village (fourth century), the Kala-Koreish fortress (ninth century), Datuna Church (tenth century), the Karakyur (tenth century), Kochkhyur (tenth–twelfth centuries) and Kumukh (thirteenth century) mosques, and the defensive towers of mountainous Dagestan. Medieval buildings in some auls stand alongside no less remarkable modern monuments: Russia’s highest arch dam at the Chirkey hydroelectric power station (232.5 m), its largest diversion-type hydroelectric station, Irganay, and the longest road tunnel in Russia and the CIS, the Gimry Tunnel (4285 m), among others. Among the many remarkable natural monuments are Russia’s only subtropical liana forest in the Samur delta; Sulak Canyon, deeper than Colorado’s famous Grand Canyon; the world’s largest freestanding sand dune, Sary-Kum; the remarkable Kug “Aeolian City”, with weathered remnants shaped like towers, pillars, mushrooms and arches; the Karadakh Gorge, the “Gates of Wonders”; the trout-rich mountain lake Kezenoy-Am, the largest and deepest in the North Caucasus; the Aymaki Gorge, inhabited since remote antiquity; and numerous waterfalls, large and small. One, Charaur, ranks fourth among Russia’s highest waterfalls (more than 250 m). Thus, a favourable geostrategic location, natural and climatic conditions, reserves of minerals, land, water and therapeutic mineral resources, unique historical and cultural monuments, relatively developed human and productive potential, and energy and transport infrastructure provide strong foundations for a successful long-term strategy for the republic’s socioeconomic development.

13

1.2. Social and economic development of the Republic of Dagestan in 2010-2020gg

1.2.1. Macroeconomic dynamics and separate indicators of the efficiency of the region's economy.

Socio-economic processes in the Republic of Dagestan during 2010-2020They are characterized by unstable and contradictory trends (as well as in the subjects of the Russian Federation of the North Caucasus Federal District and in the country as a whole). The overall picture in the analyzed period is clearly divided into two periods: in the first period, 2010-2014There was a steady dynamics of growth and development in almost all major socio-economic indicators, which allowed the republic to enter the 20- the country's leading subjects by development rate; in the second half, 2015-2020In contrast, the region’s external positions among the subjects of the Russian Federation are mainly seen as stagnation and crisis processes. Tables 1.2.1. (official publications of Rosstat and Dagestanstat are used in the compilation of this and subsequent tables, unless otherwise specified). Nevertheless, the Republic of Dagestan in the period increased its potential: in the ranking of the socio-economic situation of the regions of the country, compiled by RIA Rating, for 2010-2020The position of the Republic has improved 15 The items moved from 64 Seats 49 Place by results 2020St Petersburg.1 The importance of the integrated rating for the republic 2020the City Council 34,0 (-0,7 per year) with the average value of the integrated rating of all regions 38,9 points (-3,8) and its median value 36,9 (In the range of possible values from 1 to 100 points). This speaks generally about the sustainability of the socio-economic situation of the republic, but sustainability at a relatively low level of development. The total volume of gross regional product (GRP) of RD in nominal terms has increased over 2010-2019the City Council 2,79 Once in a while I made 2019 the Year 718,5 billion rub. In total terms for all subjects of the Russian Federation during the period of GRP increased in 2,96 R. (unless otherwise stated, here and below, 2019the University of St Petersburg 2009d), by subjects of the Russian Federation SKFO - in 2,92 r., and three of them for the period achieved an increase in the indicator higher than in the republic: Republic of Ingushetia - growth for the period in 3,86 r., Chechen Republic – 3,76 R., Stavropol Krai – 2,98 again). In terms of gross regional product, the Republic of Dagestan currently occupies 2 place, after the Stavropol Territory (in 2010St Petersburg – 2 place), and among the subjects of the Russian Federation 34 Place (2010St Petersburg – 35 place). Contribution of the Republic of Dagestan to the total production of GRP under the NCFD 2019 St Petersburg – 31,3% (2010 – 30,8%, the Total Gross Domestic Product of Russian Federation – 0,76% (2010 – 0,73%): There has been no noticeable change in the indicators over the period. General picture of the dynamics of GRP of subjects of the Russian Federation 2010-2019the Table of Contents 2.1. the Annex 2, and graphically presented below in Fig.1.2.3. Production of gross regional product per capita in the Republic of Dagestan 2019 the City Council 231,9 thousand rubles (Russian Federation – 645,98 thousand rubles, SKFO – 232,0 thousand rubles). In ten years it has increased in the country 2,56 In other words, in the United States, in 2,88 r., SKFO - in 2,75 once. The level of the republic from the level of the similar indicator on average by subjects of the country for these ten years increased with the 59,6% to 64,1%; The smallest gap in terms of the indicator was observed at the end of 2014 St Petersburg – 56,2%. The increase in the population of the republic played a role. The trend of increasing the gap in the size of this indicator from the average Russian, was characteristic of the North Caucasus Federal District as a whole.

1See.: http://vid1.rian.ru/ig/ratings/rating_regions_2011.pdf ;

https://riarating.ru/infografika/20210531/630201353.html .

14

Table 1.2.1. Dynamics of the main indicators of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan in 2010-2020gg,

% of previous year

2010 St Petersburg 2011 St Petersburg 2012 St Petersburg 2013 St Petersburg 2014 St Petersburg 2015 St Petersburg 2016 St Petersburg 2017 St Petersburg 2018 St Petersburg 2019 St Petersburg 2020 St Petersburg

The index of the physical volume of GRP in comparison with the prices of the labor force The index of labor productivity The level of GRP per capita, as a percentage of the average Russian level The volume of investments in fixed capital for half the circle of economic entities (in relative prices) The depreciation of fixed assets, as a percentage of the index of industrial production Production of agriculture The volume of work performed by type of activity The construction of housing by the total area of road transport Passenger

103,6 102,7

108,0 107,6

104,6 104,2

106,3 103,5

106,3 104,1

98,6 100,5

101,4 99,6

102,9 101,8

100,4 98,0

100,9 101,5

n.d. n.d.

36,0

35,6

36,6

40,7

43,8

42,2

40,8

38,1

35,8

35,9

n.d.

115,3 37,8 109,6 103,9

109,6 105,4 67,0 97,4 105,0 107,3

140,0 101,6 53,2 14,8

107,5 38,5 106,5 106,2

106,5 107,9 103,8 104,7 101,9 98,8

114,7 100,6 57,2 12,7

108,5 38,1 108,2 102,3

108,2 118,4 109,3 104,6 105,5 103,1

102,1 100,5 56,2 11,7

109,7 38,2 108,6 103,4

108,6 107,0 87,5 73,6 107,3 102,7

101,2 100,6 55,9 11,6

105,2 34,3 109,1 109,5

109,1 107,2 119,2 72,4 106,9 105,9

96,6 100,9 56,7 10,2

87,3 35,1 101,1 102,7

106,6 109,2 79,4 117,8 103,5 96,6

47,8 100,8 55,0 10,8

95,8 32,3 116,6 104,6

104,0 101,9 64,0 150,5 90,3 97,0

73,7 100,9 55,8 10,9

88,9 35,8 103,2 104,5

108,2 107,4 176,6 135,3 101,3 108,8

85,3 100,7 55,5 12,0

102,5 35,8 94,8 101,7

86,2 48,8 105,9 108,7 90,3 103,4

83,4 100,7 55,9 11,6

103,9 40,1 109,1 101,4

115,2 104,4 69,1 67,8 101,1 99,8

98,0 100,8 54,4 13,0

113,6 E 104,5 101,3

99,6 94,0 126,1 46,1 94,4 85,6

95,9 100,7 48,6 15,7

108,6

105,4

107,2

99,1

103,2

99,2

90,9

101,1

96,2

102,1

96,8

8,8

8,3

7,0

10,2

10,2

11,0

13,0

14,5

14,7

14,6

16,4

15

2 500 000,0

2 000 000,0

1 500 000,0

1 000 000,0

500 000,0

0,0

North Caucasus Federal District

Republic of Dagestan

Republic of Ingushetia

Kabardino-Balkar Republic

Karachay-Cherkess Republic

Republic of North Ossetia-Alania

Chechen Republic

Stavropol Krai

Rice.1.2.1. Dynamics of GRP of subjects of the Russian Federation in the North Caucasus Federal District 2010-2019Gov, billion Rubles in basic prices

On the production of GRP per capita among the subjects of the Russian Federation in the Northern Federal District, the Stavropol Territory and the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania are ahead of the Republic of Dagestan. However, even for these subjects, there is an increase in the lag from the average Russian corresponding indicator.

The volume of GRP of the Republic of Dagestan for the period increased 39,1%, the Russian Federation 's 24,9%, and by subjects of the Russian Federation: Republic of Ingushetia – 55%, the Kabardino - Balkar Republic – 22%, the Karachay - Cherkess Republic – 8%, the Republic of North Ossetia - Alania – 3%, the Chechen Republic – 38%, Stavropol Krai – 27%. Dynamics of the GRP volume index of the Republic of Dagestan 2010-2019the Table of Contents 1.2.2.

Table 1.2.2. Dynamics of the index of the volume of GRP RD in 2010-2019, in % to the previous year

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

2017 2018 2019

Index of the physical volume of GRP RD* For reference: Index of the physical volume of GRP of the subjects of the Russian Federation

103,6 108,0 104,6 106,3 106,3 98,6 101,4 103,2 101,0 100,9

104,6 105,4 103,1 101,8 101,3 99,4 100,8 101,8 102,8 101,6

*Color marking: the mentioned periods of different dynamics are highlighted.

Compared to the period 2000-2009Average annual growth rate of GRP 2010-2019G is down from 13,7% to 3,4% or more than in 4 time, and compared to the period 2010-2014the City Council 2015-2019The rate decreased with 5,8% to 0,8%. GRP Structure-tour for certain types of economic activity in recent years 10-15 There have been notable changes in the years since (see Table 2.2. the Annex No2 and Rice. 1.2.2.). In the structure of the gross value added of the region, the largest share of 20,17% form - operate wholesale and retail trade, as well as repair services for motor vehicles, motorcycles, household products and personal items.

16

Despite the decline in these economic activities,

by 7% for 2010-2019gg (for 15 years, on the contrary, the share increased by 0,5%);

The second largest share in the GRP is formed by agriculture, hunting, forestry, fishing and fish farming - 16,7% (increased over the period by 1,6%, and for 15 years - a decrease of almost 7%);

third, construction - 15,4% (decreased by almost 4,5%, for 15 years -

growth of almost 3%);

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Agriculture, hunting and forestry

Extraction of minerals

Manufacturing industries

Production and distribution of electricity,...

Construction

Wholesale and retail trade; repair ...

Hotels and restaurants

Transport and communications

Financial activities

Real estate transactions, leases and...

Public administration and security...

Education

Health care and social care...

Providing other utilities...

2005

2010

2019

Fig.1.2.2. Dynamics of the structure of GRP RD by types of economic activity in

2005, 2010 and 2019, in % (taking into account changes in OKVED from 2016 g)

Fourth, real estate transactions, lease and provision of services - 7,8%. It is necessary to take into account that in 2018-2019 the calculation of the structure of the GRP was made already taking into account the assessment of housing services produced and consumed by the owners of housing, and the assessment of consumption of fixed capital on the basis of its current market value (without appropriate adjustment for previous periods). This has had a significant impact on the industry’s share, increasing by almost 5% over the period;

fifth, public administration - 7,44% (growth by 1,3%, for 15 years - growth by

3,3%);

sixth, transportation, storage, information and communication - 6,89% (5,3% - Foreign Economic Activity

"Transportation and storage" decrease of more than 2%, for 15 years - for 7%;

seventh, industry (FEA "Mining", "Processing", "Electric energy, gas and steam supply; air conditioning", "Water supply; wastewater disposal, organization of waste collection and disposal, pollution elimination activities) - 6,7% (growth by 0,2%, for 15 years - decrease by 3,1%);

eighth, education - 5,84% (an increase of about 1%, for 15 years is almost not due to

has changed);

ninth, health and social services - 5,74% (growth almost

for 2%, for 15 years - more than 2%);

the tenth, others - 2,3% (growth more than 1%, for 15 years almost unchanged).

17

Thus, the economy of the Republic of Dagestan for the period continued the structural transformation and further progress towards the agrarian-polyservice economy 2. The overall dynamics of the GRP structure over the past 15 years shows that this situation in the economy of the RD is fixed - Table 1.2.3.

Table 1.2.3. Dynamics of the structure of the GRP of the Republic of Dagestan according to the criterion of

production of goods and services in 2005-2019, in %

Gross regional product, including: Production of goods Production of services

2005 St Petersburg 2010 St Petersburg 2015 St Petersburg 2019 St Petersburg 100,0 100,0

100,0

100,0

46,0 54,0

41,0 59,0

39,2 60,8

38,7 61,3

The share of industries producing goods in the GRP of RD for 2005-2019 decreased from 46,0% to 38,7%, and the GRP of the Russian Federation (the amount of GRP of the subjects of the Russian Federation) it has changed slightly and is 43%.

The GRP RD shows a significant increase in the share of mainly non-market services sectors 13,4% in 2005 G to G 20,5% in 2019 Mr. In these sectors, the processes of commercialization of services are gaining momentum (including shadow ones: taxes on the population and corruption), but increasing budget support, including federal support, contributes to this growth of non-market share in them. Another feature is the leading share of health, physical culture and social security sectors (growth from 7,7% to 13,2% during the period) in comparison with the increase in the share of education, cultural activities, sports, leisure and entertainment (with 5,7% to 7,3%).

The dynamics of changes in the share of high-tech and knowledge-intensive industries in the GRP of the republic is presented in Table 1.2.4. During the period in the country as a whole and the Northern Federal District, it practically did not change, and in the republic it increased from 12,7% to 14,3% (in 2015-2017 it tended to decrease). However, according to this indicator, the economy of the republic differs both from the average Russian level (19%) and from the corresponding indicators of other subjects of the Russian Federation in the district.

Table 1.2.4. The share of high-tech and knowledge-intensive industries in

GRP of the Republic of Dagestan in 2010-2019, %

0 1 0 2

Russian Federation 7 , 9 Subjects of Russian Federation) 1 North Caucasus 4 , 8 Federal District 1

(the amount

Republic of Dagestan

7 , 2 1

1 1 0 2

1 , 9 1

1 , 8 1

1 , 2 1

2 1 0 2

4 , 9 1

0 , 8 1

9 , 1 1

3 1 0 2

4 , 9 1

1 , 9 1

1 , 3 1

4 1 0 2

6 , 9 1

5 , 8 1

2 , 3 1

5 1 0 2

2 , 0 2

1 , 9 1

6 , 2 1

6 1 0 2

7 , 0 2

8 , 8 1

1 , 2 1

6 1 0 2

5 , 8 1

0 , 7 1

0 , 1 1

7 1 0 2

5 , 8 1

4 , 7 1

2 , 2 1

8 1 0 2

5 , 8 1

8 , 8 1

0 , 4 1

9 1 0 2

0 , 9 1

7 , 8 1

3 , 4 1

2 Agricultural and polyservice regions: 1.The share of total production in the foreign economic activity "Agriculture, hunting and forestry" and "Fishing and fish farming" in the structure of the GRP of the region is not less than 2 times higher than in the Russian Federation.

2.The share of production in the subject of the Russian Federation in the structure of GRP of the region is less than 0,8 values of the corresponding share in the Russian Federation.

See: A.O. Polynev, I.V. Grishina. Methodical approaches to typology construction

regions/regions. South of Russia. 2019. T. 7. № 1, Page.30-39.

18

Total investment in fixed assets in the Republic of Dagestan 2010-2020Gov 2085 billion Rub., and in 2020 He has reached 279,7 billion RUR increased in nominal terms during the period 2,74 times (Russia – 2,52 r., SKFO – 2,65 p.). Reference: growth in 2000-2009the City Council 7,06 once. In comparable prices, the volume of investments in fixed assets in the region increased over the period under review 39,6% – Tab faces 1.2.5.

Table 1.2.5. Dynamics of investments in fixed assets in the Republic of Dagestan

A full range of organizations in 2010-2020Gov* 3 1 0 2

0 1 0 2

5 1 0 2

1 1 0 2

2 1 0 2

4 1 0 2

6 1 0 2

Investments in fixed capital, billion rub. Investments in fixed capital, in % to previous year Share of investments in fixed capital to GRP

7 , 0 2 1

3 , 5 1 1

0 , 4 4

1 , 7 3 1

5 , 7 0 1

5 , 1 4

7 , 2 5 1

5 , 8 0 1

8 , 0 4

1 , 9 7 1

7 , 9 0 1

5 , 9 3

3 , 2 0 2

2 , 5 0 1

3 , 8 3

6 , 7 9 1

3 , 7 8

7 , 4 3

6 , 9 9 1

8 , 5 9

2 , 4 3

7 1 0 2

4 , 7 8 1

9 , 8 8

7 , 1 3

8 1 0 2

0 , 0 0 2

5 , 2 0 1

6 , 9 2

9 1 0 2

8 , 4 2 2

9 , 3 0 1

9 , 1 3

0 2 0 2

7 , 9 7 2

6 , 3 1 1

.

.

Dr N

*Color marking: the periods of different dynamics mentioned above are highlighted. At the same time, the total decrease in the level of investment in 2015-2017the City Council 25,6% (see the table above), it is still not replenished: the Republic has not yet reached the level of comparable investments 2014Mr. In addition, the bulk of investment is traditionally carried out in passive elements of fixed assets: buildings and structures (residential and non-residential) are sent about 60%, and for machinery and equipment - less 25%.

Index of the ratio of fixed investment to GRP - the multiplier of investments - for the period 2010-2019The C ’s 12 Items: c 44,0% to 31,9%. However, this is still significantly higher than in general by regions of the country (about 20%) and regions of the NCFD (27%). This generally favorable value of the investment multiplier has not been transformed into the corresponding dynamics of the republic’s economic development for a long time. This raises questions about the limits of growth, the new development paradigm, the effectiveness of management, as well as the objectivity of investment statistics in the region. Per capita investment rate increased during the period 2,5 Once and in 2020G has exceeded 89,9 thousand rubles - 65,2% of the average Russian level. This is 46 result in the country among the subjects of the Russian Federation, ahead, for example, neighboring Krasnodar and Stavropol territories. Major investments (excluding small businesses) in 2019-2020In the Republic, the following economic activities were carried out: construction (23,9% and 12,1%, transportation and storage (18,2% and 6,0%); Education (12,7% and 23,7%); Agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing and fish farming (9,58% and 6,4%); provision of electric energy, gas and steam, air conditioning (7,7% and 16,0%); information and communications activities (6,3% and 3,5%), water supply, sanitation, waste collection and disposal, pollution elimination activities (3,2 and 3,5%), Health Care (2,9% and 11,2%), Public administration and military security, compulsory social security (3,8% and 13,3%).

Large and medium-sized organizations in 2020 d) invested in fixed capital in the republic 58 billion RUR, which is higher than last year's results 50,1%. At the same time 25,7% These investments are the organizations’ own funds, 74,3% Funds raised, including 0,2% Loans from banks, 70,8% budget funds. The share of small enterprises in total investment is extremely small – 6-8%, which shows, among other things, the low level of development of modern small innovative structures.

19

Budget investments in fixed assets in 2020the City Council 41,1 billion Rs. or 14,7% Total population in the country (previous years 10-12%, Federally around 8-10%). At the same time, over the past three years, the investment complex of the republic for various reasons could not use more than 30 billion Budget funds allocated for investments (mainly for the construction of social facilities). However, even in these circumstances, the results 2020There is clearly an increase in investment activities for the development of the infrastructure of the republic (energy, water supply and sanitation, educational, health, public administration and social security).

In the republic, foreign investments in fixed assets for the entire analysis period amounted to interest shares (mainly 0,1-0,2%, 2020g - 0,4%), as in all subjects of the Russian Federation in the North Caucasus Federal District, except for the Stavropol Territory.

The investment potential of the republic has always been high. For the period 2010- 2020According to experts3, the rank of investment potential of the Republic of Dagestan has increased to 30 the State of the Union - Improvement of 5 Items (for 2020G - ned 3 See para. From the individual components of the investment potential, the ranks of innovative (45 Place and +21 forward point for the period), tourist (44 Place and +15 b) the institutional (58 Place and +8 i) The Work (15 Place and +7 b) and consumer (12 Place and +3 b) the potential for deterioration 3 the Production Potentials Rank Point (55 place), infrastructure-tour (39 place) and natural resources (41 location); financial capacity remained unchanged (21 Place).

At the same time, rating agencies have previously noted high investment risks in the republic (the risk ranking in 2020St Petersburg – 84 place among the regions of the country) with their deterioration during the period of 11 Items. Therefore, in the rating of investment attractiveness of the regions of RA "Expert" the Republic of Dagestan was consistently in the group with low investment potential and the highest investment risk (group 3D)4. But the situation is beginning to change for the better, which was marked by the Agency for Strategic Initiatives of the Russian Federation at the last St. Petersburg International Economic Forum 2021 g: clan-corruption and administrative pressure on the economy, unjustified interference of law enforcement agencies in business, albeit slowly, but is weakened. The results of the growth of investment in fixed assets are also encouraging 2020St Petersburg (113,6%).

For 2010-2020The annual volume of financial investments of organizations in the republic increased from 3,0 billion rub. up to 45,5 billion Rub. or in 15,2 once. In particular, this increase is observed with 2017 year - compared with the previous year growth in 2,7 once. The majority of these were short-term, except for 2010- 2012When the long-term investment rate is 36-46%. The sectoral structure of financial investments of organizations for the period did not change significantly - the overwhelming part of them was sent to manufacturing industries (production of food products, beverages, other vehicles and equipment), construction.

The improvement of the investment situation in the republic is mainly due to changes in the priorities of the socio-economic development of the republic, institutional and structural changes and risk reduction in the economy, development of human potential, infrastructure (including banking and credit) and the tourist and recreational complex of the region, entrepreneurship, the application of innovations and the increase of production potential, the growth of natural and resource potential.

3 See.: https://raex-a.ru/ratings/regions/2020#graph 4 https://raex-a.ru/ratings/regions/2020#graph

20

The state and opportunities of the region’s economy are largely determined by cash assets in the region’s economy, their structure and quality. Fixed assets in the economy of the Republic of Dagestan at their full accounting value at the end 2019the City Council 1825,8 billion RUR and increased compared to 2010the City of London 2,6 the Russian Federation (RF 3,75 r., SKFO – 3,1 times) - Table 2.3. the Annex 2. Over the period, the share of RD fixed assets in the total value of fixed assets under the NCFD decreased from 30,3% to 25,5% (2 place in the district). Core RD funds are 0,52% the National Capital Fund (49 place among the subjects of the Russian Federation).

Structure of fixed assets by types of economic activity in the Republic

Dagestan in 2019g (more recent data is not yet available) is presented in Fig 1.2.3.

ACTIVITIES IN HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES; 2,03

AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, HUNTING, FISHING AND FISHING; 7,31

EDUCATION; 2,48

STATE MANAGEMENT AND MILITARY SECURITY; SOCIAL SECURITY; 3,93

PROPERTY OPERATIONS; 29,65

INFORMATION AND RELATIONSHIP ACTIVITIES; 1,33

TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE; 25,29

PROCESSING PRODUCTS; 6,91

ELECTRICAL ENERGY, GAS AND PASSENGER SUPPLY; AIR CONDITIONING; 4,12

CONSTRUCTION; 1,79

TRADE, WHOLESALE AND RETAIL; REPAIR OF VEHICLES AND MOTORCYCLES; 10,26

Rice 1.2.3. Structure of fixed assets by type of economic activity in

RD in 2019g, as a percentage of their full accounting value at the end of the year

The most significant volumes of fixed assets in the economy of the republic are measured by types of activity: operations with real estate – 29,7%; trans-portation and storage – 25,3%; wholesale and retail trade, as well as repair services for motor vehicles, motorcycles, household goods and personal items – 10,3%; agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing and fish farming – 7,3%; Manufacturing Industry – 6,9%; electric energy, gas and steam, air conditioning – 4,1%; Public administration and military security, compulsory social security – 3.9%; Education – 2,5%; Health – 2,0%; Construction – 1,8%; information and communication – 1,3%.

21

The structure of fixed assets of the Republic of Dagestan by types of economic activity has significant differences from the structure of fixed assets of the Russian Federation (SKFO): pre-existing minerals - the share of fixed assets is less in the 13,3 (in 2,3 a) less real estate transactions; and 1,6 Less than (in 1,4 p.); agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing and fish farming - more in 3,9 More than once (in 1,1 b) Construction is more 2 transportation and storage - more in 1,7 more than in the NZF 1,6 p.); wholesale and retail trade, as well as repair services for motor vehicles, motorcycles, household goods and personal use items - more in 6,5 more than in the NZF 2,4 p.). In addition, by type of activity, public administration and military security, compulsory social security in the RD share of fixed assets in the 1,6 Less than the SFN.

Decline in total fixed investment in 2015-2017In the past few years (see above) significantly slowed down the renewal and modernization of fixed assets in the republic and did not allow to compensate for their current wear and tear: depreciation of fixed assets in the economy of the republic for 2010-2019C has increased with 36,7% to 40,1%, and in general for the Russian Federation and the Northern Federal District, the reverse picture is a decrease in the depreciation of fixed assets for the period under the Russian Federation 47,1% to 37,8%, the North - West Federal District 44,0% to 37,7% (See chap. Table 2.4. the Annex No2). At present, the deterioration of available fixed assets in the following economic activities is particularly high (67,4%), Transportation and storage (54%), information and communications activities (66,7%), Administrative and related additional services (78,8%), the Department of Public Administration and Social Security (62,5%).

In almost all branches of the social sphere (services), the depreciation of fixed assets significantly exceeds the average depreciation of fixed assets in the republic, the NCFD and the country as a whole. This situation with the renewal of fixed assets in the economic sectors of the Republic of Dagestan with the traditionally high unemployment rate in the region not only does not allow to expand the number of jobs, but even to replenish the outflow of obsolete jobs. C 2015g annual input of fixed assets in the republic in terms of its volumes was lower than in the previous year 2019Introduction of fixed assets (104,5 billion rub.) on 15,7% It was lower than in 2014St Petersburg (123,9 billion rub.).

In these circumstances, the urgent task for the republic is not only to increase the volume of investments in fixed assets, but also to ensure an adequate growth in the flow of fixed assets into the economy: the ratio of "inflow of fixed assets to the volume of investments in fixed assets" in the economy 2010-2012Gov 84-87%, in 2018-2019Gov 62-67%. It is necessary to minimize the inefficient and inappropriate use of budget funds allocated for the construction of social facilities and the development of the economy of the region, to accelerate the solution of the problem of unfinished construction 1 January 2020 The Republic was 1354 construction project for the amount of 41,4 billion Rubles. The facilities are located on the territory of all 52 Municipalities of the Republic. The Accounts Chamber of the RD 2020g, from n 775 The work is carried out in a planned manner, according to 499 of which works are suspended or objects are legalized, according to 80 – Work is more 5 years.

Number of workers in the region 2020 the Year of the Year 1286,8 thousands of people and during the period under review 15,1 thousands of people (on 1,19%). Average annual number of employed population in the Republic of Dagestan 2010-2019Mt. increased to 1109,4 Thousands (on 81,3 thousands of people or on 7,9%). Their distribution by type of economic activity is presented in Fig.1.2.4. According to Rosstat, in the economy of the republic in terms of the number of employed, four types of economic activity (FEA) are leading with the total number of employed in the country 698,0 Thousands of people or 62,9% the RD Economy:

agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing and fish farming – 239,1 Thousands of people (decreased 2010-2019the City of London 27,1 thousands of people or on 10,2%), Proportion of total employed 21,6% (-4,3% for the period);

22

wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles -

201,0 Thousands of people (+38,7 Thousands of people or 23,8%), Specific gravity 18,1% (+2,3%);

Construction142,3 Thousands of people (+17,9 Thousands of people or 14,4%), Specific gravity 12,8% (0,7%); Education – 115,6 Thousands of people (-2,2 Thousands of people or -1,8%), Specific gravity 10,4% (-1,0%).

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

30,0

agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing ...

Mining and Processing

0,3

0,5

5,9

6,8

25,9

21,6

supply of electricity, gas and ... water supply; water disposal, organization ...

Construction

wholesale and retail trade; repair ...

Transportation and storage

Hotels and businesses...

Information and communication activities Financial and insurance

activities in real estate operations ... activities professional, scientific and ... activities administrative and ... public administration and maintenance ...

Education

0,9 0,6

0,9

0,5

5,2

5,9

2,2

2,2

12,1 12,8

15,8

18,1

0,8 0,6 1,0 1,3 1,1

0,9 0,6

1,1 1,3 1,3

4,9

4,9

6,0

6,4

11,5

10,4

health and ... activities in the field, culture, sports, ...

1,6

Provision of other types of services

1,4

2,3

2,3

2010

2019

Fig.1.2.4. Structure of employment by economic activity in the economic

mike RD for 2010g and 2019g, in%

Another notable group of foreign economic activity with a total number of employees of 266,9 thousand people or

24,0% are:

Manufacturing Industry – 75,4 Thousands of people (+14,2 Thousands of people or 23,3%), Al-Haqq

weight 6,8% (+0,8%);

healthcare and social service activities — 71.3 thousand people (+9.5

thousand people or 15,4%, specific gravity 6,4% (+0,4%);

transportation and storage — 65.6 thousand people (+12.2 thousand people, or 22.8%), share

weight 5,9% (+0,7%);

Public administration and military security; social

security – 54,6 Thousands of people (+4,3 Thousands of people or 8,5%), Specific gravity 4,9% (0,0%).

There is also a group of types of foreign economic activity (the total number of employed 91,5 thousand people or 8,4%), where the number of employed in each of them exceeds 1%, but less than 3% of the total number of employed in the economy of the republic:

activities of hotels and catering enterprises – 24,7 Thousands of people (+2,1

thousand people or 9,3%), specific gravity 2,2% (0,0%);

activities in the field of culture, sports, leisure and entertainment organization - 15,8

Thousands of people (-2,2 Thousands of people or -1,5%), Specific gravity 1,4% (-0,1%);

administrative and related additional services - 14,4

Thousands of people (+2,8 Thousands of people or 23,8%), Specific gravity 1,3% (0,2%);

professional, scientific and technical activities – 14,1 Thousands of people (+0,9 thousands.

person or 7,2%), specific gravity 1,3% (0,0%);

23

Real estate activities – 12,2 Thousands of people (+1,1 thousands.

person or 20,9%), specific gravity 1,1% (0,1%);

provision of electric energy, gas and steam, air conditioning

– 10,3 Thousands of people (+0,7 Thousands of people or 20,9%), Specific gravity 1,1% (0,1%).

In all the remaining foreign economic activity (total number of employed 53,0 thousand people) with the number of employed in each less than 1 % of the total number of employed in the economy of the republic, during the period there was an increase in employment:

1,9 thousand people or 157,3 % by type of activity "mining"

(share +0,2%);

on 0,7 thousands of people or on 6,8% by type of activity "providing electrical energy

gia, gas and steam; air conditioning” (the share has not changed);

with 5,8 Thousands of people before 6,0 thousands of people or on 104,3%by type of activity "water supply; water disposal, organization of waste collection and disposal, pollution elimination activities" (share -0,1%);

from 8,4 thousand people to 9,7 thousand people or to 115,9% by type of "activities in the field of in-

Formations and Connections" (share +0,1%);

from 6,5 thousand people to 6,9 thousand people or 106,2% by type of "financial and financial activity"

Insurance (the share has not changed).

Monetary system: the volume of credit investments in the economy

Dagestan faces in 2010-2020 are presented below on the histogram - Fig. 1.2.5.

The volume of credit investments in the economy of the republic for the period increased by 2,94 times. In terms of the comparable volume of credit investments, taking into account the growth of prices in the investment complex of the region, the republic has not yet reached the level of 2012.

54786,8

39544,6

43263

44735,2

39073,9

32430,3

26144,3 28814,9

65227

53356

70000

60000

50000

40000

30000

20000

10000

0

22197,6

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Fig.1.2.5. Loan investments in the Republic of Dagestan in 2010-2020, mln. rubles

The volume of credit investments of legal entities and individuals, as well as individual entrepreneurs in the economy of the RD in recent years has not exceeded 20-23% of the total investment. In developed economies, traditionally, the bulk of investment falls on attracted bank loans 70-80% of their total size. At the same time, the volume of funds mobilized by credit organizations on the spot has steadily increased in the republic. 1.2.6. The dynamics of the ratio of credit investments in the region and the funds attracted by credit organizations in the region has changed from 88-91% At the beginning of the period before 51-55% at the end of the period. Thus, almost half of the funds attracted by credit organizations do not work in the region. The picture is even more contrasting if we compare the volume of loans issued to legal entities and individuals, as well as individual entrepreneurs in the Republic of Dagestan and in the neighboring Stavropol Territory (with a comparable economy and population 2020 The city has been given loans for 417,5 billion Rub. or in 6,44 More than in the Republic. This gap has been much higher in previous years. Amounts of lending to legal entities and individual entrepreneurs of neighboring countries

24

regions also differ by factors of several tens, especially for agricultural producers. Clearly, the complex mechanisms for securing loan repayment with collateral also play a role here (often excessive—dozens of documents and approvals have to be collected!).

60591,9

61102,1

56390

63370,3

70930,6

117435

103745,6

79356,7

86177,5

140000

120000

100000

80000

60000

40000

20000

0

25180,7

2010

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Fig.1.2.6. Deposits (deposits), loans and other attracted credit institutions

funds in the Republic of Dagestan in 2010-2020, million rubles.

The analysis highlights another general pattern in the Federal District as a whole: the share of loans issued annually by the banking system in the NCFD of their total volume in the country is about 2% or slightly above this threshold. At the same time, the population of the district is about 7% of the population of the country. This policy of credit limitation of the region and the republic by the banking and credit system continues for quite a long period and requires a detailed analysis of the reasons for this situation and the adoption of relevant decisions by federal and regional authorities, together with the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and banking structures, to radically change this situation. The situation is not explained only by the high credit risks of the region. In this situation, entrepreneurs often find themselves forced to resort to the registration of consumer loans or even worse - to turn to microfinance organizations, especially small businesses.

At the same time, lending rates are rising and, in the conditions of stagnation of the economy, they lead to an increase in the risks of non-repayment of loans. Consequently, the situation is even worse: the share of overdue loans in the 2020 G is slightly higher than the national average – 5,86% Against 4,05%. However, it is encouraging that for one economically active resident of the republic there is an average of about 6,0 Thousands of rubles of overdue credit debt (83 place among the regions of the country) - more than in 3 less than the national average5 (Real credit rating of the region!).

In the course of the analysis, it was impossible not to notice the obvious policy of limiting the de-tender mass, respectively, of monetary circulation in the republic. According to the territorial bank of the Central Bank of Russia and Dagestan, for the period 2010-2017After the official data were not published, the money supply (cash and non-cash, monetary aggregate M2) The economy of the republic has increased in 1,57 In the same period, the GRP of RD increased in 2,2 once. Cash in circulation decreased during the same period 4,32 percentage or percentage of the 35,5% to 5,5%. For reference: cash in Russia was more 20% the Money Unit M2 country as a whole. General picture of the dynamics of money supply and GRP in the Republic of Dagestan 2010-2017G is presented in the Table 2.5. the Annex No2 the Rice River.1.2.7.

Were it not for such restrictive monetary policy, the growth of the GRP of the republic over the analyzed period would have been much higher and, probably, it would have been possible to avoid a long-term decline.

5 https://www.tadviser.ru/index.php/Статья:Кредитование_в_России_(задолженность)

25

economic stagnation in the region: to stimulate economic growth, the rate of growth of the money supply had, on the contrary, to outpace the growth rate of GRP in the region 1,2-1,5 once. V 2010-2017 The ratio of the money supply in the RD to the GRP of the republic decreased from 16,4% to 11,9%, This was one of the main factors of demand restriction, stagnation and crisis state of the economy. For example, in the Russian Federation, the ratio of money supply M2 GDP is now around 54% and even this ratio does not allow to launch a mechanism of sustainable growth in the country.

700000

600000

500000

400000

300000

200000

100000

0

Money supply M2 (at the end of the year), million rubles

cash outside the banking system, million rubles

cashless funds, million rubles.

GRP (at the end of the year), million rubles.

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Fig.1.2.7. Dynamics of money supply (M2), cash (M0) and GRP

the Republic of Dagestan in 2010-2017

All this was a consequence of the mass liquidation of credit institutions and their financial institutions (quantitatively decreased by a factor of ten over the period). Currently, in terms of the banking system, the Republic of Dagestan has slipped from a leading position among the subjects of the Russian Federation in the early 2000-ies to the last place in the country.

Thus, starting in 2013–2014, the use of credit resources in the republic’s economy declined substantially and the total money supply fell significantly. Then, in 2015–2017, investment contracted sharply. Together with the decline in the population’s real incomes, discussed below, this created all the conditions for stagnation and crisis in the republic’s socioeconomic development. The economy’s money supply began to recover gradually only in 2018–2020. However, lending to the economy, investment and the population’s monetary incomes have not yet returned even to their 2012–2014 levels. Clearly, rapid growth in monetary incomes and investment, supplying the regional market with money, and a substantial expansion of lending to businesses and households on acceptable terms are essential conditions for the republic’s continued successful and sustainable socioeconomic development.

Fiscal processes: during 2010-2020revenues of the consolidated budget of the republic and the territorial state extra-budgetary fund increased in 3,35 Once and in 2020the City Council 215,8 billion RUR, and expenses for the period increased in 3,17 Once and last year they reached 214,1 billion rub. Republican budget revenues increased during the period 2,9 Once and in 2020G has reached 169,7 billion RUR, and expenses for the period increased in 2,73 Last year and last year they made 168,8 billion rub. Local budget revenues increased during the period 2,14 Once and in 2020G has reached 65,0 billion RUR, and their expenses for the period increased in 2,0 Last year and last year they made 64,1 billion rub.

In the Republic of Dagestan, measures are being taken to ensure the balance and sustainability of the budget, maintaining the total amount of financial resources at the level necessary for the performance of functions and obligations.

26

A set of measures to increase their own tax and non-tax revenues is also being carried out, the Action Plan for the mobilization of income and the phenomenon of hidden sources of taxation and the Program for Financial Recovery and Socio-Economic Development for the years 2020-2024 are being implemented.

As a result of the measures taken, there is a stable positive trend in the growth of taxes and fees of the consolidated budget, which for 2018-2020 years grew by 8-13% annually. At the same time, tax and non-tax revenues of the budget system for the period 2010-2020gr increased by 3,4 times. In accordance with the Program, it is planned to expand the tax base for property taxes, legalize business activities, reduce debts and reduce arrears in payments to the budget, as well as reduce informal employment of the population.

However, despite the measures taken, the share of taxes and fees in the total revenues of the budget of the republic, without subventions, is 28,6% or 46,7 billion rupees that only provide 26% Costs. The region remains highly dependent on financial assistance from the federal budget: income of the subject of 1 January 2021 more than on 74% formed from gratuitous revenues from other budgets of the budget system of the Russian Federation. The actual level of funding of the budget of Dagestan, although reduced, has remained within the limits of the budget in recent years 50%. In the consolidated budget revenues, the share of corporate income tax was 5,4% in 2009G and G 2,2% in 2020g, personal income tax 8,6% and 10,7%, Accordingly, excises – 1,8% and 4,0%. According to the calculations of the Ministry of Finance of Russia 2021 Dagestan in terms of tax potential is on the penultimate level among the regions of Russia. The revenue part of the budget of the republic in the predominant part is formed at the expense of personal income tax, the share of which in taxes and fees in the 2020 the Year of the Master 49,5%.

For a long time on budget per capita, the republic occupied places in the seventh and eighth ten among the regions of the country, but in the second half of the year 2020Social expenses of the consolidated budget of the Republic of Dagestan 53,53 thousand rubles per resident – 57 place in terms of expenses among the subjects of the Russian Federation (2019 St Petersburg – 81 place). For social expenditures in total expenditures of the consolidated budget of the region 2020G G 77,2% – increased with 2015the City of London 7,2 Paragraphs.

In the budget of the Republic of Dagestan, as in the budgets of other neighboring republics, the share of expenditures for the formation, development and use of human potential is significantly higher than the average for the regions of Russia (62,4%). In the expenditures of the consolidated budget of the Republic, the proportion of expenditures on education in 2020the City Council 28,0% (2009St Petersburg 26,3%), on health, social policy culture, art, cinematography, media, physical culture has increased – 53,1% (2009St Petersburg 26,9%), Public administration, local self-government, law enforcement and security of the state – 5,3% (2009St Petersburg 11%), Industrial production and construction - during the period funds were not allocated, agriculture and fishing – 2,1% (2009St Petersburg – 2,9%).

The deterioration of the economic situation and business climate in the republic to the period under analysis affected business activity in the public. First of all, the number of economic entities in the republic has significantly decreased: only for 2016-2019According to official Rosstat data, the number of organizations for all types of economic activity decreased by more than a year 5,4 thousands of organizations or 15,4%. Significant reduction in the number of organizations during the period: agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing and fish farming (37,6%); Manufacturing Industry (18,4%); water supply, water disposal, waste collection and disposal, pollution elimination activities (33,7%); Wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles (25,9%);

27

activities of hotels and catering enterprises (23,1%); Information and communication activities (19,4%; Financial and insurance activities (29,7%). In general, the contradictory policy in relation to the development of small and medium-sized businesses, a high level of corruption and administrative-bureaucratic pressure have also led to a significant reduction in their number in the republic compared to the previous year 2010 Year.

At the same time, the specific indicators of the development of entrepreneurship in the republic are lower than the national average by 3-5 times. The same imbalance exists within the republic between the separate zones, districts and cities of the republic.

Performance indicators of organizations have deteriorated significantly. Despite the relatively low level of loss-making organizations for the period – 20- 22%, The aggregate economic result of Dagestan enterprises in the second half of the analyzed period tended to increase losses 2017-2019The profit and loss balance of the companies increased from -8,2 billion rub. up to -18,8 billion The total loss in the economy as a whole 24,2 billion Rubles; almost 24 billion Losses are incurred by organizations and 2020 b) in the case of a loss or gain on -15,1 billion Rubles. High losses began to show the wholesale trade link, experiencing increasing pressure of modern forms of network and electronic commerce.

The debt of the organizations is growing at a high rate 1 January 2021G G 183,4 billion The rub, from which 71,8 billion RUB or 39,1% – Overdue. The main problems here are in the industry of production, transmission and distribution of electricity, where overdue accounts payable about 50 billion rub. Accounts receivable 1 January 2021 Imprint 45,0 billion Rubles, from it overdue – 11,1 billion Rubles or 24,6% of the total.

Labour productivity in the economy of the Republic of Dagestan, as determined by the GRP, for 2010-2019 increased on 25,8%. This is higher than in all other subjects of the Russian Federation of the North Caucasus Federal District, but significantly lower than the average for the subjects of the Russian Federation – 32% (See chap. Table 1.2.7.).

Table 1.2.7. Labor productivity index in 2010-2019gg, in % to the previous year

0 1 0 2

2 , 3 0 1

7 , 2 0 1

1 1 0 2

8 , 3 0 1

6 , 7 0 1

2 1 0 2

8 , 3 0 1

2 , 4 0 1

3 1 0 2

1 , 2 0 1

5 , 3 0 1

4 1 0 2

8 , 0 0 1

1 , 4 0 1

5 1 0 2

7 , 8 9

5 , 0 0 1

6 1 0 2

1 , 0 0 1

6 , 9 9

7 1 0 2

1 , 2 0 1

8 , 1 0 1

8 1 0 2

1 , 3 0 1

0 , 8 9

9 1 0 2

6 , 2 0 1

5 , 1 0 1

0 1 0 2

g 9 1 0 2

1 , 2 2 1

7 , 5 2 1

Russian Federation

Republic of Dagestan

The energy intensity of the Republic of Dagestan’s GRP fell during 2012–2019 from 165.7 kg to 138.8 kg of fuel equivalent per 10 thousand roubles, or by 16.3%, a greater improvement than for the Russian Federation as a whole (13.5%). Dagestan’s GRP energy intensity is 23.6% above the Russian average, but substantially below that of the other federal subjects in the North Caucasus Federal District: the differences range from 9.3% to a factor of 2.81 (Table 2.6). Data on the structure of fixed assets, employment, GRP and tax/non-tax receipts into the budget system by type of economic activity are summarised in Table 1.2.8. These data were used to determine the efficiency of individual types of economic activity in the Republic of Dagestan by comparing the principal regional resources they use—the number of employed persons (ЧЗ) and fixed assets (ОФ)—with the main results achieved using them: gross regional product (GRP) and tax revenues (НП) into the budget system.

28

Table 1.2.8. Efficiency of certain types of economic activity in the Republic of Dagestan * Amount of Ranks of shares in terms of GRP and li-NP by the order of RD 4 17,6

Amount of shares in the PF and PE according to RD 2 28,91

Grade by weight 7 16

Rank by rank

Dec. 4/Dec.2

6 0,61

3 3

5 5

0,86

14,59 28,36

31,19 2,65

1 Agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing, fisheries Mining 1,14 Manufacturing industries 13,71 5,02 Provision of electric energy, gas and steam; air conditioning Water supply, sanitation, social services and waste management, activities and pollution elimination Construction Trade wholesale and retail; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles Transportation and storage Activities of hotels and public catering Activities in the field of information and communications Activities financial and insurance activities on operations with real estate

12,88 8,43

30,75

1,72

8,83

1,47

2,23

1,75

1

16 6 10

3,5 21,5 8,3

13 3 11

3,07 1,57 1,64

2 7 6

18

2,5

15

2,93

3

5 4

1 11

12

17

2

15

13

8

7 9

22,5 28,0

10,4 5,3

2,9

14,9

8,4

1,5

1,6

20,4

14,5 11,7

2 1

9 12

14

6

10

18

17

4

7 8

1,54 0,99

8 14

0,33 2,02

17 5

1,30

10

14,90 1

0,27

18

1,03

13

0,94

15

2,31

4

1,13 1,39

11 9

14

1,9

16

1,12

12

*Color marking: leading positions in terms of indicator value, positions with

indicators above the average, positions with indicators below the average, outsider positions in terms of the value of the corresponding indicators.

29

The five most effective types of activities are (hereafter - on decreasing efficiency): financial and insurance activities; mining; water supply, sanitation, waste collection and disposal, activities and pollution elimination; public administration and security; social security.

The above average results show: provision of electricity, gas and steam, air conditioning; manufacturing; construction; health and social services; information and communication activities.

The following are below average effective: education; cultural, sports, leisure and entertainment activities; professional, scientific and technical activities; wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles.

The lowest results in terms of accepted evaluation criteria are: administrative and related additional services; agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing, fish farming; transportation and storage; real estate activities.

It should be borne in mind that some types of economic activities have their own specifics, which affect their effectiveness according to the accepted criteria of comparison: education, health care and some others - services are mainly non-commercial in nature; transportation and storage, real estate operations - the main assets in them mainly with long terms of use, etc.

1.2.2. Human Potential and Social Development. Integral assessment

quality of life of the population.

Population of the Republic of Dagestan 1 January 2021G G 3133 Thousands of people For the period 2010-2020 The years have increased by 265 thousands of people or on 9,2% (Tab faces 1.2.9.), Including the city of 134,6 Thousands of people. (10,5%) and rural 129,9 Thousands of people (8,2%).

Table 1.2.9. Population dynamics of the Republic of Dagestan 2010-2020at the end of the year) 6 3 1 1 0 0 2 2

2 1 0 2

9 1 0 2

8 1 0 2

5 1 0 2

7 1 0 2

1 1 0 2

0 2 0 2

4 1 0 2

0 1 0 2

2010-

2020

Population by year, thousand people. Dynamics, in % to the previous year

4 1 9 2

6 , 1 0 1

1 3 9 2

6 , 0 0 1

6 4 9 2

5 , 0 0 1

4 6 9 2

6 , 0 0 1

0 9 9 2

9 , 0 0 1

5 1 0 3

8 , 0 0 1

2 4 0 3

9 , 0 0 1

4 6 0 3

7 , 0 0 1

6 8 0 3

7 , 0 0 1

1 1 1 3

8 , 0 0 1

3 3 1 3

7 , 0 0 1

+265,0

109,15

In Russia, only the Chechen Republic and the Republic of Ingushetia are ahead of Dagestan in terms of population growth over the same period. According to the estimate for 2020, the population of the republic is younger than the working age was more than 790 thousand people (25%, Russia - 18,7%), older than the working age - about 450 thousand people.

30

The share of the urban population in the total population is currently 45,3% (increased over 11 years by 0,5%), and rural - 54,7% (decreased by the same 0,5%). Slow change in the degree of urbanization of the republic is observed for a long time. Processes can accelerate under the influence of significant growth in housing construction, mainly in cities.

Population growth in the republic was sustained by a traditionally high birth rate and a decline in mortality: per 1000 inhabitants, the respective rates in 2020 were 14.9 and 6.2 (in 2019 — 14.8 and 4.8), and in 2010 — 18.0 and 5.9, respectively—Table 1.2.10.

Table 1.2.10. Dynamics of fertility, mortality and natural population growth rates in 2010-2020gg by RD, by 1000 people of population

Birth rate Mortality Natural increase

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 18,0 18,1 19,0 18,8 19,1 18,2 17,4 16,4 15,6 14,7 14,9 5,9 6,2 5,4 12,1 12,5 13,4 13,3 13,5 12,8 12,2 11,3 10,8 10,0 8,7

5,1

4,8

4,7

5,2

5,6

5,6

5,5

5,6

Up to 2014The birth rate in Dagestan has steadily increased - increased from 18,0 to 19,1 on the background of a slower growth or decline in the birth rate in the Russian Federation as a whole (increase in 12,62 to 13,3). There is a noticeable decline - until 14,9, As the national average (9,8). Mortality rate 1000 population in the republic is usually at a low level and has decreased up to 2020When he grew up with 4,7 to 6,2 due to the "coco-like" pandemic and its side effects. According to the absolute value of natural population growth, the Republic of Dagestan is a long time 1 place among the subjects of the Russian Federation: only in the last three years, the natural increase in population amounted to more than 91 Thousands of people.

Life expectancy at birth is one of the key indicators included in the calculation of the human development index, and the main integral indicator for inter-country and interregional comparisons of the level and quality of life of the population. the OPG for the Republic of Dagestan 2010-2019GG has grown 73,87 Year to Year 79,1 the Year 2019Mr. This was facilitated by good heredity, favorable natural factors of places of residence, mainly a healthy, calm and measured lifestyle of Dagestanis and the peculiarities of nutrition, certain successes of modern medicine with the strengthening of its material and technical base and the improvement of the quality of medical care of the population in the region. The Republic of Dagestan takes quite a long time in terms of the size of the OPG 2 place in the country (after the Republic of Ingushetia). Due to the increase in population mortality due to the co-ronavirus pandemic, the OPG in the republic 2020G is down to 77,73 years.

The dynamics of demographic processes in the near future will be determined by a number of adverse factors that have emerged in past years, if appropriate measures are not taken. At the same time, a further slowdown in the birth rate is expected, including for the following reasons:

1.Reduction of the total fertility rate (how many children are born per woman at childbearing age). In the Republic, after the rise in 2010-2014the University of St Petersburg 1,92 to value 2,08, in 2015-2020DH has declined to 1,79 (See chap. Tab-face 1.2.11.), that does not provide even a simple reproduction of the population of the republic in the future - for this, the birth rate should be 2,14-2,22.

Table 1.2.11. Dynamics of total fertility rate in the Republic of Dagestan in 2010-2020gg 2018 1,86

2016 2017 1,98 1,91

2012 2,03

2015 2,02

2014 2,08

2013 2,02

2019 1,8

2020 1,786

2011 1,98

2010 1,92

31

2.The entry into the childbearing age of a smaller generation, born in the second half of 1990 and 2000. This is evidenced by the age structure of the population of the republic - Fig. 1.2.12.

10

8

6

4

2

0

%

I would have to go to D.

the University of London

i and n e e e c a n and t c o n e l c and h

7,9

8,2

7,9

8,9

9,2

7,1

7,2

7,5

6,3

6,1

5,9

5,9

4,7

4,3

2,9

0-4

5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70 and more

Age groups

Fig.1.2.8. Age structure of RD population at 1.01.2020g

3.Reduction in the number of marriages and increase in the age of marriage of young people (family formation). Number of marriages 1000 Population for 2010-2020It has been reduced by almost two times, c 8,1 to 4,4. The number of divorces is also increasing 1000 Marriages are more 380 Divorces.

4 Postponement of the birth of the first child and subsequent children, in particular

the second (the total fertility rate of the second children is 0,52).

5. Gradual weakening of the dominance factor of the large family model in Dagestan society (the total fertility rate of third and subsequent children is 0,52).

6.Relatively high infant mortality: in 2020 Number of children who died before 1 the Year 1000 Born alive, by RD 6,7 (the Russian Federation – 4,5). Significant progress is also worth noting: the indicator for the period decreased in 2,13 times.

In recent years, migration outflows outside the republic have decreased, but the negative migration balance remains at a relatively high level. So in 2018-2020 The migration balance in exchange with the regions of Russia was minus 21,8 thousand people - the second place in the country among the subjects, after the Omsk region (-34,6 Thousands of people). Currently, in the republic not only individual settlements, but entire municipal districts lose their population, the population of individual territories is reduced. During the period c 2010Population decline is observed in 14 Municipal areas: Agul (on 8,7%), Akushinsky (0,4%), (Akhtynsky (5,1%), Dakhadaev (0,7%), Dokuzparinsky (3,3%), Kulinsky (1,3%), Kurakhsky (6,2%), Laksky (2,9%), Magaramkent (1,2%), Nogai (18,9%), Rutulsky (8,7%), Suleyman - Stalin (5,6%), Tabasaran (4,9%), Khivsky (8,6%).

The transformation of demographic processes results in a significant increase in the demographic burden on the working-age population. With one hundred, against the background of an increased birth rate, the share of the population younger than the working age remains one of the highest in the country - 24,0% of the total population of the republic in 2020, in the Russian Federation - 18,7%. On the other hand, the increase in life expectancy leads to a gradual aging of the population. These trends create significant challenges in the formation of social infrastructure in the republic: providing the population with services of preschool institutions and schools, providing facilities for health infrastructure and social security systems for older people and the elderly.

The total number of unemployed citizens (according to the ILO methodology) in the RD last year reached 201,5 thousand people and increased in 2010-2020 by 30,1 thousand people or 17,6%.

32

Such a number of unemployed as in the Republic of Dagestan for a long time (more than 15 years), is not observed in any other subject of the Russian Federation, including the most densely populated. The unemployment rate in the republic during the last decade was higher than the average in Russia in 2-2,5 times and was kept equally high in both rural and urban areas (on average in Russia, the excess of rural unemployed over urban - 1,8 times, in the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District - 1,1 times), as well as the average time of job search. The problem of unemployment in the republic began to worsen even more, starting from the second half of the analyzed period, when the balance of the outflow of old and the creation of new jobs in the republic’s economy became sharply negative.

Employment and unemployment in the Republic 2020The pandemic has worsened significantly: this level of employment (46,4%) and high levels of unemployment (15,7%) The Republic of Dagestan has not been in the last decade. The number of employed people in 2018-2020The D-Day 140,0 Thousands of people or more 11,4%. But such a large-scale reduction in the number of employed people has not turned into a corresponding increase in unemployment rates in the public and the issue requires clarification by statisticians.

Estimates from the ILO methodology do not include those who have been desperate to find work and have stopped looking for it for a long time, especially in rural areas. According to estimates, more than 120 thousand people live in the Republic of Dagestan. Registered as unemployed in the bodies of the employment service at the end of 2020, according to the Ministry of Labor, 106,1 thousand people (an increase of 5,2 times).

The need for employees at the end of even the pre-crisis period declared by employers to state employment service institutions 2019G G 923 It's a trap. The burden of the unemployed population on the registration, based on the 1 The advertised vacancy is 22 People, in Russia – 0,5 People in the NCSF – 3,7 Human. Thus, the republic is characterized by a high coefficient of tension in the regulated labor market. The average age of the unemployed is 32,4 years. The largest age groups of unemployed 20-24 and 25-29 years. Their share is 45,2% All the unemployed. Most unemployed have secondary (complete) general education – 44,1%, A 66% Unemployed job seekers have no work experience. In this regard, entrepreneurs are deficient in qualified personnel. The level of education seeking work does not correspond to the modern needs of entrepreneurs.

On the other hand, a large number of people in the region have jobs, though not in the formal economy. However, if we consider the number of employees in private farms, where more 77,5% agricultural products of the republic, engaged in their own housing construction and repair of their own housing, as well as in some other areas, which in their field cannot be attributed to shadow employment, the scale of shadow employment, as well as the scale of the shadow economy in the Republic of Dagestan, will be overestimated: its share is not more than 30-35% (the Russian Federation 20,7% in 2019 year). The non-formal sector of the economy has a restraining character for the development of the economy of the republic, at the same time, there is no need to hypertrophiedly exaggerate its scale: for this, there is no corresponding scale of economic base and economic activity, as indicated by indirect specific indicators of the welfare of the population (for example, indicators of nutrition and consumption of services, housing, durable goods, transport, etc.).

The number of high-performance jobs in the economy of the republic 2013-2020C has increased with 86,2 thousands before 120,1 thousands or on 139,3% (See chap. Table 2.7. the Pre - bed No2). The largest number of such jobs are currently available: in health care and social security – 41,7 Thousands of places or more 60% (Growth in 7,15 times);

33

in public administration and military security, social protection – 33,7 Thousands or 28% (decreased by 21,4%); in education – 10,8 Thousands or 10% (Growth in 2,3 a) the manufacturing industry – 7,3 Thousands or 6,1 % (Growth in 1,27 times); transport and communications – 6,9 Thousands or 5,8% (decreased by 11,5%). At the same time, if we compare the number of high-performance jobs by types of economic activity in the republic, for example, with the Stavropol Territory, it should be noted that in the Republic of Dagestan the situation in health care and social security, as well as education, is better; almost the same in public administration and military security, social insurance. However, the situation is ten times worse by type of activity: agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing and fish farming; water supply, sanitation, organization of collection and disposal of waste, pollution elimination activities; activities of hotels and catering facilities; activities related to real estate operations; wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles.

The personnel trained for this purpose play a decisive role in the introduction and use of modern high-production technologies and industries. According to Rosstat 2020g. the proportion of the workforce aged 22 years and older, with secondary vocational and higher education, in the total workforce of the corresponding age in the republic at present barely exceeds 59%. There is no such low quality of labor anywhere else in the subjects of the Russian Federation (on average in the Russian Federation – 80,2%, SKFO – 68%).

Thus, in the Republic of Dagestan, unemployment, educational and qualification levels of workers, and the creation of new jobs have escalated to the limit.

Cash income of the population in 2010-2020C has increased with 544,0 billion rub. up to 1035,9 billion Rub. or in 1,9 once. At the same time, according to the same Rosstat, the real disposable income of the population of the republic over the years has increased by only one percent 8,8% (Rice.1.2.13.), In other words, they actually stayed at the level of 2010Mr. By results 2019At a comparable level of income, the Republic was already at the level of 2012the City and City 2020The situation has deteriorated further.

108,6

105,4

107,2

103,2

99,1

99,2

101,1

102,1

96,2

96,8

90,9

110

105

100

95

90

85

80

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Fig.1.2.9. Dynamics of real disposable income of the population

Dagestan in 2010-2020gg, in % to the previous year

In the structure of monetary incomes of the population is still a low share of wages, pensions, benefits and social benefits - in total about 35%. The share of income from business activities and property - about 6%, Income from other sources is more 59%. Average monthly wages in the general economy of the 2020 G G 32,3 thousand rubles and increased for 2010-2020the City Council 3,54 times (Russia – 2,76, SKFO – 2,8).

34

Real wages for the period under review increased by 71,1% (Russian Federation – 38,5%, SKFO – 39,9%). Despite the measures taken, in terms of the average monthly wage, the republic is in the seventh ten among the regions of the country and about the same 30% Employees are paid less 15 thousand rubles per month, and the minimum wage – 26,8%. These are “anti-records” among the Russian regions. Average monthly per capita income per 2020 the Year 27,8 thousands of rubles (higher than in the subjects of the Russian Federation SKFO and the Republic in the fifth ten among the subjects of the country).

It should be noted that the estimates of the statistical agencies of the average per capita incomes and the total monetary incomes of the population of the republic cause problems with the expert community: their sizes seem significantly overestimated and do not agree with other indicators of the standard of living of the population and surveys of household budgets in the region, etc. The data require further clarification, as well as the value of the so-called "shadow incomes" of the population based on these data - by estimates, is overstated by more than 25%. However, their withdrawal from the shadow remains relevant.

In the light of the above, the poverty rate of the population has naturally increased in the republic 8,0% to 14,6-14,8% (near 460 Thousands of people) in 2019-2020Total expenditure It is almost in 2 This is more than the average Russian poverty rate. The increase in the level of poverty in the republic occurred against the background of a predominant decrease in income inequality between individual segments of the population - the situation is moving in the direction of "equality in poverty" 1.2.13.

Table 1.2.13. Dynamics of Gini coefficient, fund coefficient and Decil coefficient for RD in 2010-2020Gov 3 1 0 2

0 1 0 2

4 1 0 2

5 1 0 2

2 1 0 2

7 1 0 2

1 1 0 2

9 1 0 2

6 1 0 2

8 1 0 2

Gini coefficient

Fund ratio, times

Decimal coefficient, times

8 9 3 , 0

1 , 4 1

9 5 , 6

3 0 4 , 0

5 , 4 1

4 7 , 6

7 0 4 , 0

0 , 5 1

9 , 6

1 9 3 , 0

3 , 3 1

3 3 , 6

0 9 3 , 0

3 , 3 1

1 3 , 6

6 8 3 , 0

9 , 2 1

7 1 , 6

3 8 3 , 0

6 , 2 1

8 0 , 6

5 9 3 , 0

7 , 3 1

6 4 , 6

3 9 3 , 0

5 , 3 1

9 3 , 6

4 9 3 , 0

6 , 3 1

3 4 , 6

0 2 0 2

3 8 3 , 0

6 , 2 1

8 0 , 6

The high level of poverty in the republic and the level of inequality in the incomes of individual groups of citizens are, first of all, a reflection of low monetary incomes, wages and pensions of the population, as well as a high level of unemployment in the region.

The general picture with the formation, use and development of the human dimension in the republic for the analyzed period is characterized by indicators from the Table 2.8. the Annex No2 and based on them Rice.1.2.9. Almost all indicators, except for population and unemployment, show the same growth dynamics in the first half of the period and the downward trend in the second period. And unemployment, of course, was in the opposite phase of the dynamics.

It should be noted that there are inconsistencies in the data on the formation, development and use of human potential by official statistical bodies, which require further research and clarification of the reasons for this situation. For example, in the absence of dramatic changes in demographic processes, with the implementation of the adopted version of the pension reform and the presence of some other factors, there can be no such noticeable decrease in the level of participation in the labor force and the number of the labor force itself.

35

The total volume of retail trade turnover in the Republic of Dagestan increased over the period from 317,2 billion rub. up to 588,0 billion rub. or on 213,7% in 2020 City (Russia – 232,0%, SKFO – 235,8%). The growth of per capita turnover in the republic amounted 1,95 times - significantly less than the average for the subjects of the Russian Federation (2,26 a) and the SCFA (2,21 p.). the Dagestan Republic Retail Volume Index 2010- 2020Gov 105,6% (the Russian Federation – 113,9%, the NCFD – 119,9%). The number of public catering companies in the Republic of Dagestan has increased 2009-2020the University of St Petersburg 25,9 billion rub. up to 54,8 billion rub. or on 212,0% in 2020 City (Russia – 203,1%, SKFO – 239,2%). Index of physical volume of public catering in the Republic of Dagestan 2010- 2020Gov 84,0% (If you don't take into account the cod 2020St Petersburg – 121,7%), On average, the RF subjects – 109,9% (142,0%), the NCFD – 14,6% (142,4%).

Rice 1.2.10. Dynamics of the main indicators of formation, development and use of human potential of RD in 2010-2020, as a percentage of the previous year

The volume of services of the tourist industry of the republic 2020 In the past year, statistics have been downgraded, 4,0 billion rub. Despite the steady growth of the tourist flow in recent years, the volume of services of the tourist industry in comparable areas is increasing much more slowly. On 2020 The total number of collective accommodation facilities in the republic is 130 units. In terms of accommodation of guests of Dagestan, both for certain types of accommodation facilities, and for their total number takes 58 place among the regions of Russia, located between the city of federal importance Sevastopol (138 DAC and Novgorod Region (134 CEB).

Housing Fund of the Republic of Dagestan at the beginning 2020 the Year 61,3 million square metres of total living space: increased over the period. Total living space in the urban area by the end 2019 the Year 26,1 million square metres or 42,6% The entire housing stock. Moreover, more 1/5 The total area of the housing stock in the city district of Makhachkala is 2019 the Year 13,2 million square metres. In the local executive authorities in the queue for housing are more 55 Thousands of families, more than 16 Thousands of families are waiting for housing 10 and more years. The share of families registered and improved their conditions in the republic is less than the average for Russia and North Caucasus Federal District.

Despite the fact that the housing stock of the RD 2010 grew more rapidly than in Russia as a whole and in the NCFD, by the beginning 2021 The average number of people per person in the Republic of Dagestan 20,0 square meters. m. at the average Russian value 26,9 sq. m; proportion of dilapidated and emergency housing stock – 18,9% (3 place among the subjects of the Russian Federation). The share of the total area of the housing stock of the republic, which is simultaneously equipped with water supply, sanitation (channelization), heating, hot water supply, gas or floor electric stoves is 45,4% (Russian Federation – 69,5%), Including the city – 82,7% (Russian Federation – 80,6%), Rural – 17,1% (Russian Federation – 37,5%).

36

In the rating of housing affordability among the subjects of the Russian Federation at the beginning 2020The Republic took 80 place: minimum number of years required for family to accumulate per quarter – 13,8; The cost of the apartment with total area 60 sq. m at the beginning 2020St Petersburg – 2,9 million rubles. President of Russia V.V. Putin 15 April 2021 At a joint meeting of the State Council Presidium and the Agency for Strategic Initiatives (ASI), he called improving the quality of life of people the main thing in the national development goals. RIA Rating for a long time conducts calculations of rating points of quality of life in the subjects of the Russian Federation on the basis of integrated accounting of the order 70 indicators that record the actual situation of the population and the situation in the social sphere of regions. These points are general assessments of interregional differences in the quality of life of the population and relevant criteria for ranking regions.

Dynamics of rating points for 2012-2020gg in the Republic of Dagestan

Table 1.2.14.

Table 1.2.14. Dynamics of rating points of quality of life in the Republic of Dagestan 2012-2020according to RIA Rating6)

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

The place of RD among the subjects of the Russian Federation 72 When summarizing information on quality of life indicators in the Republic of Dagestan based on their gradation by 4 groups - leading positions, positions above the average, below the average and outsider positions - the following groups of corresponding indicators are obtained:

73

73

71

73

64

68

56

69

Table 1.2.15. Positioning of RD in the socio-economic space

the Russian Federation in 2020 on indicators of quality of life of the population

Indicators

Nr. p/p

1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9

I. Leading positions (1–21) Life expectancy at birth Proportion of population systematically engaged in physical education and sports Average hospital bed employment per year Turnover of public catering per inhabitant Mortality of the population in working age Mortality of the population from external causes per capita 100000 Number of crimes in 10000 Number of victims - individuals, people on 10000 Natural increase (decrease) in population 1000 man. Population Number of students in general education organizations 100 Teachers

10 11 Share of profitable enterprises 12 Number of gas stations on 1000 km of highways

Number of victims in the 100000 Units of road transport 13 14 Climate assessment

Place by indicator among the subjects of the Russian Federation

2

2 3 3 3 3 3

3 4

4 4 5

7 9

6 See https://ria.ru/20210215/kachestvo-zhizni-1597462656.html?in=t.

37

15 Population change in three years

Share of public roads of regional or inter-municipal and local importance that meet the requirements

16 17 Perinatal mortality rate

18

19

Share of emergency housing stock in the total area of housing stock Share of utility networks (water, sewerage and heat and steam networks) in need of replacement, in total length Total turnover of small and micro enterprises, as well as individual entrepreneurs

20 21 Physician load, number of visits per physician 22 Density of public roads

Emissions of pollutants from stationary and mobile sources per unit area of populated areas

23

II. Positions above average (22–42)

24 Total investment in fixed assets

Number of injuries, poisonings and some other consequences of external causes 1000 Total investment in fixed assets of small and medium enterprises, as well as individual entrepreneurs 15 The ratio of monetary incomes of the population to the cost of a fixed set of consumer goods and services The proportion of public roads with a solid coating in the total length Number of children in preschool educational organizations 100 Pedagogical workers

25

26

27

28

29

30

III. Positions below average (43–63)

31 Absolute volume of production of goods and services 32 Retail turnover per capita 33

Incidence of 1000 Total number of seats in the auditoriums of the Ministry of Culture of Russia 100 Thousands of inhabitants

34 35 Proportion of population with incomes below the subsistence minimum 36 Investment in fixed assets per inhabitant 37 Density of public railway tracks 38 Number of doctors in 100 Thousands of people

Fixed-capital investment by small enterprises, microenterprises and sole traders per resident; the share of the population aged 15 and over without basic general education; the share of the total population supplied with drinking water that meets safety requirements; the ratio of the monetary income of the lowest-income 20% of the population to the cost of a fixed basket of consumer goods and services.

39

40

41

42

10

10 15

15

17

18 20 20

21

24

24

25

33

37

37

41

47 47 48

52 53 54 54 56

57

58

61

62

38

43

44

Proportion of ambulance teams arriving at the call point within 20 minutes

IV. Outsider Positions (64–85)

Turnover of small and micro enterprises and individual entrepreneurs per capita Number of average medical personnel per 100 thousand people

45 46 Average time of job search 47 Share of modern retail space in the total sales area 48 Number of theater viewers per 1000 inhabitants

49

Proportion of students and students systematically engaged in physical culture and sports Proportion of housing stock provided with all types of improvement, in total housing stock Costs of protection of atmospheric air per unit of emissions

50 51 52 Hospital beds

Proportion of ambulance crews arriving at the scene of an accident within 20 minutes

53 54 Production of goods and services per capita

Total housing area per inhabitant, average

55 56 Infant mortality

Share of own revenues in the total revenues of the consolidated budget 57 58 Unemployment rate

Proportion of population seeking more than 3 months of employment

59 60 Number of visits to museums per 1000 inhabitants

61

Share of students in state (municipal) general educational organizations engaged in one shift The volume of deposits (deposits) of individuals in banks per capita

62 63 Number of sports facilities for 100 thousand inhabitants 64 Migration increase (decrease) of population

63

65

66 70 74 77

79

79 79 80

80 80

81 81

81 82

82 82

83

83 83 84

66

67

65

84

The level of provision of the population with sports facilities based on the one-time capacity of sports facilities 10 Provision of preschool children with places in preschool educational institutions 100 thousands of people Provision of retail space, sq. m of retail space on 1 Proportion of employed in small business and individual enterprise in the total labour force *Colour marking: 1-21 places - the leading positions in terms of the indicator among a quarter of subjects; 22-42 Positions above the average; 43-63 Positions below average; 64-85 places - positions of the out-of-the-way by the value of the indicator.

84

85

85

85

85

70

68

69

39

According to the table 1.2.15., by 42,9% indicators (30 Indicators from 70), determining the quality of life of the population, the republic occupies positions above the average for the subjects of the Russian Federation, including the 32,9% of them (23 a) is in the leading group of 21 Subject, and by 22,9% (by 16 In the top ten subjects. Po 40 indicators (57,1%), the Republic occupies positions below the average among the subjects of the country, including the 13 (18,6%) – Below average, by 27 (38,6%) – Outsider Positions.

1.2.3. Development of basic sectors of economy.

In the predominantly industrial-agrarian Soviet economy of the region, fundamental changes have occurred in the outcome of market transformations, both in the structure and volume of production of individual sectors of the economy, as well as in their territorial dispersal. As noted earlier, currently the structure of the economy of the Republic of Dagestan is agrarian and polyservice. At the same time, the republic has a fairly diversified and multi-structured eco-nomic environment with a wide range of economic activities, with a high share of the service sector, and positive dynamics of socio-economic indicators in general.

Agro-industrial complex. Production of agricultural products in the Republic of Dagestan for the analyzed period increased in current prices from 45,5 billion rub. in 2009G to G 141,5 billion rub. in 2020g or c 3,1 times (Russia – 2,6 p.) - see Rice. 1.2.11. below.

57,2

63,2

71,9

47,4

83,4

94,5

119,0

124,4

108,5

133,3

141,5

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Fig.1.2.11. Volumes of agricultural production in 2010-2020gg

according to RD, billion rubles. in current prices.

In the value structure of agricultural production of the republic with a large majority, crop production predominates: during the period production increased from 24,0 billion rub. up to 71,1 billion Ruble (in 2,96 c) animal husbandry, c 23,4 billion rub. up to 70,4 billion Ruble (in 3,0 again). The index of agricultural production in the republic 2010-2020Gov 158,0% Increases over a period of nearly 2 higher than the average for the Russian Federation (129,2%) – Table 1.2.16.

In the structure of the GRP of the Republic, the share of agriculture is more than 15% (Four times higher than the average for the Russian Federation), the fixed assets in the industry are about 7% the main funds of the republic, more work in the industry 20% the Republic's population. Tax revenues are total 0,9% tax revenues of the budget. The indicator of gross agricultural output per capita of the republic reached 45,2 thousand rubles. – 108,1% from the average Russian level (41,8 thousand rubles per person).

According to the data for the year 2019, there are 3 348 thousand hectares of agricultural land in the industry of the republic - 21 place among the subjects of the Russian Federation and 2 place among the subjects of the Russian Federation of the Northern Federal District. Dagestan is a strategically important region of the country for ensuring food security of the Russian Federation. In the inter-regional division of labor within the framework of the NCFD, the agricultural specialization of the republic is clearly visible, some areas in it have a specialization of the country's production value, as well as an export orientation.

40

Table 1.2.16. Index of agricultural production in Russia and RD

2010-2020, % of previous year

0 1 0 2

Russian Federation 8

9 , 7

Republic of Dagestan

9 , 3 0 1

1 1 0 2

3 , 2 2 1

2 , 6 0 1

2 1 0 2

4 , 4 9

1 , 3 0 1

3 1 0 2

1 , 5 0 1

8 , 5 0 1

4 1 0 2

1 , 4 0 1

2 , 8 0 1

5 1 0 2

1 , 2 0 1

1 , 5 0 1

6 1 0 2

8 , 4 0 1

8 , 5 0 1

7 1 0 2

9 , 2 0 1

7 , 5 0 1

8 1 0 2

8 , 9 9

1 , 1 0 1

9 1 0 2

3 , 4 0 1

7 , 0 0 1

0 2 0 2

5 , 1 0 1

4 , 1 0 1

2010-2020Yyyyyyyy, % to previous year

129,2

158,0

The specificity of the territorial organization of agriculture is that it is dispersed throughout the republic, but the main production of agricultural products falls on the mountain (taking into account the plain "cutanes" of mining farms) and the central zone of Dagestan.

The main specialization of agriculture in the region in the Russian Federation is livestock breeding (including cows), MRS (sheep and goats), poultry, with the production of basic food products: meat, milk, eggs. A significant place in the industry is occupied by cattle breeding, which plays a large role in the organization of the territory: both in the mountainous terrain and on the plane. Crop production and production of related food products also occupies a strong position in the agricultural production of the public: among them are grain and technical crops, fruits and berries, grapes, vegetables and melons, potatoes.

According to a whole group of indicators of the agro-industrial complex of the Republic takes the leading position not

only in the Northern Federal District, but also in the Russian Federation - Table 1.2.17.

Table 1.2.17. Place of the agro-industrial complex of the Republic of Dagestan in the Russian Federation and the North-Eastern Federal District

Place in

1 1 2 2 1 1 2

Name of indicators

Share, in % in RF SKFO RF SKFO 31,44 2,14 34,68 4,64 26,93 2,25 27,38 1,51 5,25 45,61 20,55 55,89 24,0 1,69

12 2 14 21 2 1 20

Number of population Number of rural population Gross agricultural production at current prices Area of farmland Population of sheep and goats Livestock and poultry for slaughter (in live weight) Production in physical terms: Vegetable Grapes of fruits and berries of meat of cattle and poultry Milk Eggs Wool grain (in weight after processing) seeds of sunflower fruit-bearing fruit-bearing fruit-bearing fruit-bearing area

1 1 2 2 1 2 1 5 4 1 1 1 Color marking: leading positions in terms of indicator among a quarter of subjects; positions above the average indicator; positions below the average indicator.

10,15 58,63 28,50 77,28 24,62 4,95 21,33 1,39 33,89 2,91 0,54 15,6 26,14 59,88 4,64 0,32 1,98 0,06 35,02 1,82 5,77 43,22 26,27 73,81

1 2 3 23 7 43 1 44 29 18 2 2

41

In Dagestan, production and yield of the main types of crop production are growing, work is underway to create modern seed farms for the production of high-quality seed material that meets modern requirements.

However, in agriculture RD remains a complex of development problems, including acute problems. The main contradiction is that the level of development of agricultural production of the republic is not adequate to the agricultural territory and does not provide the basic food needs of the population of the region, supply to foreign markets, the creation of new modern production and jobs.

Compared to 2010, the average annual number of employees in the industry has decreased by more than 25 thousand people, the needs of the population of the region for food (except for vegetables and potatoes) are not met, exports are low, and the development of the food and processing industry is very weak.

A characteristic feature of the agro-industrial complex of RD is the small size of the contours of agricultural areas in general, as well as arable land and fodder of economic entities, dominant small and small producers in the structure of production of the industry. Dynamics of structure of production of agriculture for the period by categories of farms of the republic is presented in Table 1.2.18.

Table 1.2.18. Production of agricultural products by categories of farms by RD in 2010-2020, as a percentage of the volume of production in the republic.

Agricultural organizations

2010 2015 2017 2018 2019 2020

Agricultural products including: Livestock

8,9

12,7 12,1 12,5 13,0

13,6

9,9 7,9

10,9 10,0 9,5 10,2 14,3 14,0 15,3 15,9

11,4 15,8

Households

Agricultural products including: Livestock

81,1 75,8 76,4 78,7 78,6

77,5

81,1 87,1 87,2 88,4 87,1 81,2 65,8 66,4 69,5 69,7

85,1 69,8

Peasant (farm) farms*

Agricultural products including: Livestock

10,0 11,5 11,5 8,8

8,4

8,9

2,0

2,6 2,7 9,0 11,0 19,9 19,6 15,2 14,5

2,2

3,6 14,4

* - taking into account individual entrepreneurs

The table is a clear expression of the small-scale agricultural production of the republic, especially crop production - the population farms produce more than 85% products of the sub-industry (potatoes, vegetables and fruits 96-99%). This is confirmed by comparisons of the production of the main types of agricultural products in the households of the population of the republic, neighboring regions, as well as in the country as a whole. Figure 1.2.12 below.

42

Russian Federation

Krasnodar region

Stavropol Krai

Republic of Dagestan

1

,

9 9

3

,

6 9

4

,

2 7

7

,

5 6

6

,

9 3

1

,

9 5

7

,

1 5

,

1 7 3

1

,

4 2

5

,

7 2

1

,

7 1

1

,

6 1

9

,

5 6

1

,

6 6

3

,

1 7

9

,

5 6

4

,

7 3

9

,

5 2

5

,

0 4

%

3

,

8 1

C A R T O F E L )

O V O I

M J S S S K O T I P T I C .

M O L O K O

J T A

Rice.1.3.12. The share of LPH in the production of basic agricultural products in the Republic of Dagestan, Krasnodar and Stavropol Krai, the Russian Federation in 2019 g., %. There are practically no large vertically integrated agricultural organizations in the republic, cooperation in the production, storage, processing and sale of industry products is poorly developed. More 100 thousands of hectares of arable land, which are the most scarce (in the republic their per capita 5 less than the average for the Russian Federation), remain outside the agricultural turnover. The main reason for this situation is the unresolved issues of land use, outdated technical and technological base of the entire industry. For example, the availability of crop production of the republic does not exceed the energy capacity 30%, Soil Processing Machinery and Plant Protection Machinery – 20%, Feed Harvesting Machines – 50%, Grain Harvesters – 75%, Rice Harvesters – 24%. In farms there is practically no machinery for fertilizer and machinery for carrying out reclamation work, the level of mechanization of livestock farms is extremely low 5–10%. In general, the agriculture of the republic does not melt more 40 Thousands of different agricultural and reclamation machines for a total amount of more than 36 billion Rubles, including some 6,0 Thousands of tractors and 500 ed. grain-forage harvesters. This situation leads to significant excess loads on machinery and equipment of the industry, crop losses, growth of cost-bridges and decrease in the competitiveness of products.

Among the current problems in the development of agriculture of the republic should be

also highlight:

- low level of value added generated and, accordingly, investment

attractiveness of the industry;

- Weak level of modernization and innovative development; - decrease in soil fertility due to poor condition as inter-farm

Having both an indoor and outdoor irrigation network;

- the need to provide the industry with its own seeds; - the need to provide the industry with high-quality feed; - a low proportion of breeding livestock in the general population; - a decrease in the level of management and unsatisfactory staffing; - problems of cattle breeding and livestock grazing lands (HZH); - the need to restore Black lands and Kizlyar pastures, restore

soil fertility and productivity of natural pastures;

- problems of revival of terrace farming in mountain areas, repair and restoration of

development of land reclamation systems throughout the country.

43

Unresolved land use issues limit development and reduce the attractiveness of investment in agriculture. The problem of lending to small and medium-sized agricultural producers is very important for the solution. Especially acute is the issue of short-term lending - for the period of sowing and harvesting. Credit cooperatives have hardly been developed in Dhaka. The infrastructure of the agro-industrial complex is poorly developed: it is estimated that no more than 5% vegetables and 15% meat and dairy products are processed in the Republic. The lack of storage facilities and the underdeveloped system of pre-sale preparation of products deprives manufacturers of the opportunity to store high-quality products in demand in the markets of the country, and then bring it to consumers in proper condition. The issues of consulting and information support of producers in investment and infrastructure issues are acute. Ensuring the integrated development of rural areas is an important task.

Fishing and fish farming: in the analyzed period, positive dynamics was observed in the volume of production of aquatic biological resources in the Caspian Sea and inland waters of the republic as a whole. V 2016 The year was caught in the Republic 4,7 Thousands of tons of fish, and the results 2020 Production has increased to 22,3 thousand tons. At the same time, fishing-former enterprises of the Republic of Dagestan have the right to extract annually the order 147 Thousands of tons of fish 100 Thousands of tons of Caspian pegs, 45 thousands of tons of so-called non-quota species and 2 thousand tons of valuable species (sledding, pike, oxen, bream, catfish).

The total number of people involved in 2020the Fisheries Industry of the Republic 845 million rubles. The fishing fleet of fishing organizations of the republic 22 Ships that work 176 crew members. In the Caspian Sea, at the suggestion of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Ministry of Agriculture, changes have been made to the fishing prairie (Order of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation 6 November 2018 № 511), What allowed in 2019 to expand the fishing area in the southern part of the Republic of Dagestan, where fishing can now be carried out almost all year round, except for the forbidden spawning periods.

In order to reduce the volume of unaccounted fishing and poaching during the implementation of fishing in the Caspian Sea, the Government of the Republic of Dagestan adopted Resolution No. 31 January 2019 of 12 "On the determination of places of unloading of catch of aquatic biological resources extracted (catched) during the implementation of coastal fishing, fishing and other products produced from such catch". The essence of this decree is a 3-fold reduction in the number of places of unloading of catches.

However, the official volume of production of valuable fish species in the republic after the adoption of the resolution decreased, although the heads of fishing enterprises show that in fact they develop their quota in two weeks. Therefore, there is reason to believe that more fish are actually caught in the territory of the Republic of Dagestan than indicated in official statistics.

To bring the industry to a serious level of production of fish products, it is necessary to create conditions for industrial trout and sturgeon farming, further accelerated development of the material and technical base for fishing in the sea, its acceptance on the shore, storage and processing (the creation of a diversified network of coastal facilities, the commissioning of storage facilities for products, its primary and deep processing).

Industry. Index of industrial production in the republic 2010- 2020Gov 172,2% (the Russian Federation – 131,2%, the Russian Federation NCFD – 146,2%) – Table 1.2.19.

44

Table 1.2.19. Industrial production index7 for Russia, North Caucasus Federal District and RD in 2010-2020, in % compared to the previous year

Russian Federation

North Caucasus Federal District

Republic of Dagestan

0 1 0 2

3 , 7 0 1

4 , 3 0 1

2 , 1 9

1 1 0 2

0 , 5 0 1

8 , 9 0 1

3 , 2 9

2 1 0 2

4 , 3 0 1

3 , 6 0 1

4 , 0 0 1

3 1 0 2

4 , 0 0 1

2 , 6 0 1

0 , 4 5 1

4 1 0 2

7 , 1 0 1

4 , 0 0 1

7 , 0 0 1

5 1 0 2

2 , 0 0 1

6 , 4 0 1

0 , 1 0 1

6 1 0 2

8 , 1 0 1

7 , 3 0 1

6 , 6 1 1

7 1 0 2

7 , 3 0 1

9 , 0 0 1

2 , 3 0 1

8 1 0 2

5 , 3 0 1

3 , 5 9

8 , 4 9

9 1 0 2

4 , 3 0 1

3 , 2 0 1

1 , 9 0 1

0 2 0 2

4 , 7 9

5 , 6 0 1

5 , 4 0 1

2010 -2020, %

131,2

146,2

172,2

Despite the uneven development of the republic’s industry in the period, only the Republic of Ingushetia is ahead of Dagestan in the general industry development index in the North Caucasus Federal District. In the structure of GRP RD, the share of industry in 2019 Imprint 6,75%, including: mining 0,5%, Manufacturing Industry 4,7%, electric energy, gas and steam, air conditioning 1,45%, c) additional supply, water disposal, organization of collection and disposal of waste, pollution elimination activities 0,1%.

Aggregated share of industrial activities in the structure of fixed assets of the republic is 12,03%, including: mining 0,64%, Manufacturing Industry 6,91%, provision of electrical energy, gas and steam, air conditioning 4,12%, Water supply, sanitation, waste management, pollution management 0,36%.

The average annual number of employees employed in the industry of the republic was 8,7% population of the Republic, including: mining 0,5%, Manufacturing Industry 6,8%, provision of electric energy, gas and steam, air conditioning 0,9%, Water supply, sanitation, waste management, pollution management 0,5%.

Revenues to the budget system for the industry as a whole 29,17%, including: mining 3,0%, processing production 16,8%, provision of electricity, gas and steam, air conditioning 6,95%, water supply, sanitation, waste collection and disposal, pollution elimination 2,42%.

Over the years of market reforms, industrial production in the republic has significantly decreased, and the structure of industrial production has been significantly trans-formed: if earlier the main share in it was the extractive industry, engineering products, food industry and the construction materials industry, then now more 53% food and drink production, more 14% Production of other non-metallic mineral products, 9,5% production of machinery and equipment not included in other groups, production of other vehicles and equipment, 7% production of computers, electronic and optical products, electrical equipment, more 6% production of furniture, other finished products, 3,7% production of coke and petroleum products, rubber and plastic products, 1,9% repair and installation of machines and equipment, 1,6% production of metallurgical, finished metal products, except machinery and equipment, 1,3% textiles, clothing, leather.

7 Aggregated index of production by types of economic activity "Mining of minerals", "Processing industries", "Electric energy, gas and gas supply; air conditioning", "Water supply; water disposal, organization of waste collection and disposal, pollution elimination activities".

45

Thus, the structure of the industry continues to adapt to market realities, preserving and developing those areas of production that are competitive in modern conditions, have state support, including in the form of a defense order, focused on the use of raw materials and materials mainly local production. Most likely, this trend will continue in the coming years, given the sharp increase in the cost of raw materials, materials and aggregates in 2021, as well as the widespread deployment of strict requirements of the “green economy” in the world.

the Industrial Complex of the Region 2020Goods of own production were shipped, works and services were performed on 66,5 billion Rubles (Growth in relation to 2010 the Year 2,0 In addition, including: mining – 4033 million rubles. (53 place among the subjects of the Russian Federation); processing production – 43146 million rubles. (69 place); electric energy, gas and steam, air conditioning – 17487 million rubles. (65 place); water supply, water disposal, organization of collection and disposal of waste, pollution elimination activities – 1830 million rubles. (69 Place).

In general, the average annual capacity of the industry organizations is currently used: mining of other minerals in 18-25% (In recent years, it has decreased by 3,5-19 b) food production, mainly 15-30% (The C-Cut 25-40 points), and bakery products and butter on 74-82% (increased on 3,5-14 production of soft drinks more 74 % (The C-Cut 3,5-5%); production of chemicals and chemical products (fossil fertilizers) is stable 50%; production of rubber and plastic products 55% (Decline in 16%); Production of other non-metallic mineral products 7-36% (Mainly growth in 6%); Manufacture of machinery and equipment not included in other groupings 7-60% (Mainly growth in 2-20%, Production of elevators decreased to 30% Power).

In the republic there are large industrial productions of machine-building.

The complex:

Dagdizel, JSC (Caspian) - enterprise of shipbuilding industry, specialization of production on marine underwater equipment of special purpose; Fiberglass Plant, AO (Mr. Makhachkala) - specializes in the production of ma-

fiberglass-based materials;

Hajiyev Plant, JSC - production of pumping equipment, general production

thinking and oil and gas valves;

KEMZ Concern, JSC - specializes in the production of other transport

facilities and equipment;

Buynak aggregate plant, JSC - specializes in the production of products

civil and defence purposes;

Caspian Precision Mechanics Plant, JSC is one of the largest industrial enterprises of the Republic of Dagestan and the Russian Federation, specialized in the manufacture of navigation systems, power systems, various devices and controls for the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and customers for inter-factory cooperation, etc.

10 defence industry enterprises operate in the Republic of Dagestan. Some produce unique products and participate in programmes to develop the sector. For example, Russia’s Ministry of Industry and Trade decided to allocate 1.9 billion roubles for a comprehensive modernisation of the Dagdizel plant under the modernisation programme for the MPO–Gidropribor concern. One of the region’s leading and largest defence enterprises, OJSC Concern KEMZ, has developed and is implementing its own strategy for the development and production of high-technology civilian products for the aviation and automotive industries.

The company currently has high-tech...

production units in G. Caspian and G. Moscow also has:

46

- modern high-tech equipment of world level in all technical areas, ranging from foundry to modern paint and varnish coatings;

- modern training and technical center (UTC) (the only one in the NCFD) for training and advanced training of specialists for work on modern equipment.

Industrial production of the Republic is characterized by a high level of concentration and localization. The main production and economic indicators for the industry as a whole provide 8-10 of the largest industrial enterprises of the republic, in particular, more than 85% of all tax revenues of the industry to the budget of the region, about 75% of the total revenue of the industry.

The specifics of the territorial organization of the economy is its increased concentration in the Central and Northern zones of the Republic - in the most developed and urbanized part of the territory, and reduced - in the territory of South Dagestan. The mining industry of the Republic is relatively poorly developed, although the potential for the development of energy (including renewable energy) and the food industry is very high, which has been very poorly used for decades. In the context of increasing economic development needs and the deficit of these capacities in the territory of the republic, such a policy is short-sighted.

In particular, therefore, the industry of the Republic of Dagestan until recently was not an investment priority of the region - from year to year, the volume of investments in the fixed capital of organizations of this branch of the republic's economy is more than an order of magnitude less, for example, than in the Stavropol Territory. The dynamics of industrial production of the Republic of Dagestan is ensured by limited own funds of enterprises and the receipt of state defense orders by leading enterprises of the defense industry located in the Makhachkala agglomeration.

In general, the problem of low investment attractiveness of the Republic is the most important limiting factor for the industry of the Republic, since it does not allow attracting credit and financial resources for the implementation of significant projects for the region. In particular, therefore, the industry of the Republic of Dagestan mainly develops outside the main world technological trends, with the exception of single industries (for example, Concern KEMZ).

The problems of the region’s industry are also the lack of qualified personnel, the low level of support of the domestic producer from the federal authorities, the priority of the domestic supplier of products at state procurements, etc. At the same time, the region has great potential for training highly qualified personnel necessary for the development of high-tech industries, the development of the digital economy, and new managers.

Construction. The volume of work performed by the type of activity "Construction, in current prices for the period increased from 53,6 billion rub. in 2009 G to G 181,0 billion rub. in 2020 g or c 3,38 times (Russia – 2,38 r., SKFO – 3,43 p.). At comparable prices, it is 2010-2020Mt D increased 212,8% – see Table 1.2.20.

face 1.2.20. Dynamics of the volume of work performed by type of activity

"Construction" on RD in 2010-2020gg, in % to the previous year

The volume of work performed in the current prices, billion rub.

0 1 0 2

1 1 0 2

2 1 0 2

3 1 0 2

4 1 0 2

5 1 0 2

6 1 0 2

7 1 0 2

8 1 0 2

9 1 0 2

0 2 0 2

2 2 , 0 6

6 3 , 8 6

2 7 , 5 7

1 4 , 8 8

0 , 6 0 1

9 , 3 2 1

4 , 3 3 1

1 , 3 5 1

1 , 5 3 1

3 , 0 7 1

0 , 1 8 1

2010- 2020, in %

338

47

Index of the volume of work performed, in % to the previous year

1 , 3 3 1

1 , 4 0 1

2 , 8 0 1

6 , 8 0 1

1 , 9 0 1

6 , 6 0 1

0 , 4 0 1

2 , 8 0 1

5 , 6 8

9 , 5 1 1

6 , 9 9

212,8

“Construction” is the third most important type of economic activity in Dhaka. Share of the industry in the economy of the republic: in the total volume of GRP – 15,5%, in fixed assets – 1,76%, Average annual number of employees – 12,8%, Tax and non-tax revenues of the budget system – 6,95%.

Despite the drop in the volume of work performed in the construction industry in 2018g (index to previous year 86,5) and 2020St Petersburg (99,6%), Currently, the Republic is almost 2% of the total volume of construction and installation works of the country (12 place among the subjects of the Russian Federation) and more 40% of their shares in the FSA (1 place). The productivity of labor in construction exceeds the productivity of the entire employed population in the republic on average 3,2 once. This is facilitated by the structure of the fixed assets of the industry: in the cost of fixed assets of the organizations of the industry, machinery and equipment, as well as vehicles, are 87,2%.

V 2017-2020The construction complex of the republic is provided with the commissioning of more 18,2 Thousands of buildings with total area 6720,6 thousand square meters, including residential purposes – 17,8 Thousands of square 5956,4 thousand sq. m, non-residential purposes – 0,4 thousand total area 764,2 thousand sq. m. The share of unfinished construction in the RD is within the 7 % of the total number of commissioned buildings and structures, which is not a high indicator in comparison with the all-Russian and average in the NCFD corresponding indicators. However, an accelerated solution to the problem of unfinished construction is quite relevant for the republic.

Housing construction in the Republic of Dagestan decreased from 1123,8 you. sq. m in 2010G to G 967,9 thousand sq. m in 2020 G or on 13,9%. In terms of the total volume of housing for the year, the republic ranks second among the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District after the Stavropol Territory and 30 place in the country among the subjects of the Russian Federation. According to the indicator of housing construction 1City Hall – 0,311 sq. m region 6 place in the NCFD and 71 place by country.

It should be noted the active growth over the period of the number of construction organizations (sub-row construction organizations, enterprises of the industry of construction materials and structures, etc 3608 to 4195 or on 116,3%, and strengthening their technical and material base: over the past four years 26,5 billion Ruble of investments in fixed assets. More 80 % All enterprises and organizations are concentrated in the capital of the republic - the city of Makhachkala. The share of private construction companies is about 85% The construction volume, in state and municipal ownership is 5%, and in private-mixed ownership – 10%. The vast majority of construction companies belong to small businesses, and only about 1,5% They are medium and large, have financial, material and technical capabilities for the construction of large construction projects, including in industrial construction.

The building materials industry is geared to the demands of the local construction base. The industry is represented by 90 enterprises, of which about 25 are medium and large. In the republic, sand, lime, clay, stone, gravel, gravel are mined; ceramic brick, silicate, concrete and ceramic blocks, ceramic tiles, reinforced concrete structures are mined. The production of plastic windows and two-rays, fillers for facing walls and ceilings, double-glazed windows, tinted, grain glass, there are capacities for the production of plastic pipes and glass insulation. In the construction materials industry, the share of non-state ownership reached 95%. However, the technological level at most enterprises is low and does not provide the necessary level of quality and expansion of production supplies not only outside the region, but also to the Dagestani market.

48

Large plants have significantly reduced the production of precast concrete

constructions, increasing the production of monolithic concrete and small wall blocks.

Construction design is emerging from the crisis. Due to the rapid pace of construction, the number of orders for design from large design organizations of the republic is increasing (State Enterprise "Dagestancivilproekt", PI "Dagesta-nagropromproekt"). At the same time, the level of implementation of investment plans of the republic for the period and the inability to develop the construction complex of the republic of significant amounts of investment, including from the federal budget, indicates the need for further development of the construction base of the republic with the creation of large construction organizations and enterprises of building materials. This is also indicated by the statistics of the state of the fixed assets of the industry - 52-74% machines and mechanical organizations with expired service life.

There are a number of factors that limit the speed and

competitiveness of the construction complex. These include:

- Investment unattractiveness of the republic due to significant corruption canopy, lack of guarantees for bringing investment projects to a logical completion and return on investment, low level of compliance with laws, due to the pressure of the control and supervision bodies, unresolved land and property issues, etc. The unfavorable investment climate in Dagestan is also formed due to the subsidization of the republic's budget, incomplete and (or) non-rhythmic development of funds allocated for the implementation of republican and municipal investment programs, which in aggregate hinders the activities and development of the construction complex;

- Inadequacy of educational institutions of vocational education for the preparation of qualified personnel of construction specialties and scientific and technical base capable of solving the problems of the construction industry with skill and quality.

External constraints include: - external supplies at monopolistically high prices of petroleum products, timber -

fishing, binders and metal for the construction complex;

- imperfection of the legislative framework for ensuring effective investment activities. In the Russian law on foreign investment, many articles are made by the need to comply with the national security of Russia and, due to the vagueness of the wording, giving rise to bureaucratic arbitrariness in suppressing the initiative of investors. This also includes the restrictions established by the budget legislation of Russia in relation to the attraction of municipal entities of highly subsidized regions of funds of credit institutions.

A lot of problems stem from the imperfection of the federal legislative framework in the field of construction, as well as from the activities of one-day firms that, participating in tenders and biddings, receive construction contracts, unjustifiably cutting prices, not paying taxes, thereby violating the competitive conditions for companies that work within the law.

At the same time, in recent years, external demand for materials from local raw materials of non-metallic minerals has been growing. These are mainly cladding tiles made of wild stone, non-metallic quarry materials. In general, the resource and raw material conditions of the pre-production of non-metallic minerals in Dagestan in the future allow the development of the construction materials industry in significant volumes and in a wide range. For the development of the construction industry of the republic, it is necessary to create conditions for increasing the investment attractiveness of the republic by improving the federal, regional and sectoral regulatory framework, by eliminating investment risks in the region, by stimulating external and internal investors. It is also necessary to strengthen the educational and scientific base for the training of qualified personnel for the construction industry.

49

The main problems of the construction industry of the republic: - decrease in the growth rate of the volume of work; - decrease in investments in the modernization of the construction industry; - decrease in the growth rate of housing construction; - shortage of qualified personnel; - extremely low level of innovation activity in the industry. Causes of the situation: - reduction of real incomes of the population as a result of inflation, sharp

reduction of demand for residential real estate;

- high mortgage rates; - high rates on bank loans; - high level of taxes; - lack of -

exact amount of investment;

- low demand for contract work; - weak solvency of customers; - growth of inflation expectations, including due to higher fuel prices

resources and VAT rate increases;

- innovations in legislation and taxation. Recommendations for improving the situation in the construction of the region: - adoption of comprehensive measures of concessional lending to small enterprises that

constitute a numerical majority in the construction industry;

- renewal of fixed assets of companies working in construction; - development of production of high-quality, including innovative, construction

materials;

- renewal and improvement of the mortgage subsidy mechanism; - increase in the volume of financing of construction projects at the expense of funds of the Fund;

regional and regional budgets;

- introduction of tax breaks for enterprises of the industry; - stimulation of innovative activity of construction enterprises; - development of infrastructure, improvement of the existing system in construction;

the region's sector;

- improving the investment attractiveness of the region and attracting funds from private investors in the implementation of various projects; - development and improvement of public-private partnership (PPP) mechanisms.

Transport and logistics. The Republic is at the junction of many international routes and connects the transport flows "North - South" and "East - West", so the republic is one of the few regions of the Russian Federation, where almost all types of transport have developed: rail, road, sea, air, pipeline, as well as transport hubs, a network of intermodal and multi-modal transport and logistics complexes.

In the structure of the GRP of the Republic, the share of the type of economic activity "Transportation and storage" in the 2019G G 5,3% (Russian Federation – 7,3%, SKFO – 5,2%). The industry’s core funds are higher 25% Total fixed assets of the Republic at full cost – 2 place after fixed assets in the housing sector (FEA "Real Estate Operations"). They almost work here 6% the employed population of the republic, and tax revenues to the budget system are 5,1% of the Republic ' s income.

Despite the complication of 2016 g) opportunities to compare sectoral data for the period due to changes in the methods of their statistical accounting by types of economic activity, it can be noted that the overall performance of the industry as a whole has deteriorated - its share in the GRP has decreased compared to 2010G - on 4 paragraph a c 2005d) more than twice.

50

This situation is mainly due to the deterioration in the performance of road and rail transport. It should also be noted that the components of the transport and logistics system have not yet formed a single complex, especially with regard to logistics and interaction with the territory’s trading system. The priority development of motor transport and road infrastructure in the republic is facilitated by its location, natural landscape conditions and the existing network of highways of federal and republican significance. It plays a particularly important role in the development of the mountainous regions of Dagestan. Federal roads of international importance Route R pass through Dagestan Republic217 (M M – 29) "Caucasus" (direction "Baku-Makhachkala-Moscow"), AD "Kochubey-Neftekumsk-Minvody", AD-153 "Astrakhan-Caspian-Kochubey - Kizlyar - Makhachkala" and 43-x av-thorozh of republican and local importance.

The length of public roads in the Republic of Dagestan is currently 29 thousand km (s 2012g also takes into account the length of the street network of the horn, of which 21,2 km of roads (73,1%) They have a hard cover. According to these indicators, the Republic is 1 places among the subjects of the Russian Federation SKFO, significantly ahead of the Stav-Ropol region. Of the total length of roads from public use with a hard cover in the Republic of Dagestan 0,64 Thousands of miles of federal roads, 7,4 thousands of miles of national importance, and 13,1 thousands of km of local importance - Table 1.2.21. Public road density for 1000 The area of the territory is 561,8 Kilometers On the horns of public use located 1237 The bridge is longer 32 Thousands of meters.

The dynamics of the development of the road network of the republic for the period is presented below in

Table:

Table 1.2.21. Development of roads RD in 2010-2020, thousand km.

2012 2015 2017 2018 2019 2020

2020v % to 2012

The length of the automobile horn of public use (at the end of the year)* - the total length of the automobile horn of public use with a hard surface - in total including: federal significance of the republican value of local significance The length of the automobile horn of public use with an improved surface * From 2012 g includes a street network.

24,2

18,7

0,64 7,1 11,0

26,0 27,7

28,0 28,7

29,0 119,8

20,0 20,6

21,0 21,5

21,2 113,4

0,64 0,64 7,1 7,3 12,2 12,7

0,64 0,64 7,3 7,4 13,0 13,5

0,64 100,0 7,4 104,2 13,1 119,1

8,4

7,9

8,3

8,8

8,6

8,9

106,0

Dynamics of the proportion of roads with solid and improved surface

shown in Table 1.2.22.

51

Table 1.2.22. Proportion of roads with solid and improved road

Covering the length of public roads

in 2012-2020gg for RD, NCFD and RF, in %

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Specific gravity of paved roads Russian Federation 72,4 70,6 70,5 70,6 70,3 70,6 70,4 70,6 70,6 North Caucasus Federal District Republic of Dagestan

77,7 77,8 78,3 78,7 78,0 78,2 78,5 79,4 79,0 77,2 78,8 78,5 76,9 74,6 74,5 74,8 75,0 73,1

Specificity of roads with improved coverage Russian Federation 63,3 62,7 62,4 62,3 62,3 62,4 62,1 62,0 62,2 North Caucasus Federal District Republic of Dagestan

51,6 50,9 50,3 49,1 49,4 49,5 50,0 49,4 50,2 45,1 42,4 41,2 39,4 40,1 40,1 41,9 39,9 41,9

Compared to 2012g The share of paved roads in the total length of public roads in the republic during the period decreased from 77,2% to 73,1% (the Russian Federation - s 72,4% to 70,6%) – The inclusion of c 2012 g Street network in the total length of roads. In general, the situation in the NCFD is better - the indicator has increased with 77,7% to 79,0%.

The situation in the Republic has worsened compared to 2012g and with a specific weight of a horn with an improved coating - the corresponding indicator for the period of sleep with 45,1% to 41,9% (the Russian Federation - with 63,3% to 62,2%, SKFO - s 51,6% to 50,2%). In terms of the proportion of roads with improved coverage in the length of motor roads with solid surface of public use, the republic lags significantly behind both the average Russian level and the average level in the North Caucasus Federal District.

In terms of density of public roads of federal, regional or inter-municipal and local importance with a hard surface, the Republic of Dagestan exceeds the average Russian indicator by 6,6 times, and the average for the Northern Federal District by 1% - Table 1.2.23.

Table 1.2.23. Density of public roads with hard surface

federal, regional or inter-municipal and local significance in 2012- 2020by RD, SKFO and RF (at the end of the year; km of roads on 1000 Kilomile2 Territory)

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Russian Federation 54 North Caucasus Federal District Republic of Dagestan

348 371

58

60

61

62

62

63

64

64

367 370

374 370

392 397

393 396

401 410

407 417

417 427

418 421

The share of dirt and gravel roads (mainly local and inter-municipal) is high in the structure of the territorial roads of the RD, serviced by the GKU Dagavtodor. This is a large-scale problem that significantly complicates the development of villages and district centers. In addition, more than 40% of local roads do not meet the regulatory requirements.

JSC "Makhachkala Commercial Sea Port" is the only Russian port on the Caspian Sea. Railways and highways connect it with the entire territory of the Russian Federation. The main activities are loading and unloading and oil transshipment.

Mahachkala International Airport is the oldest and, at the moment, one of the largest airports in the world.

State-owned airline in Dagestan.

52

The capacity of the terminal building on domestic flights is 200 passengers per hour. Construction of a new international terminal with a total area of over 8000 m2 with capacity 190 Pass-fats per hour. They arrive and fly around the year 10 900 Aircraft. By results 2019 The number of passengers served during the year 1,3 Millions of people who 21 % More compared to 2017 Year. After the reconstruction of the runway, the Makhachkala airfield (Uytash) can accept aircraft of the Airbus type 330, Boeing 767 and index below.

The Makhachkala branch of the SKZhD deployed railway line 1227,5 km, operational length of main tracks – 509 km (not changed during the period). The main activity of the Makhachkala branch of the North Caucasus Railway is the transportation of passengers and goods. The main railway line passes through the territory of the republic, part of the North Caucasus Railway, which is part of the international North-South transport corridor. In the south of the republic there is a border crossing "Samur" with the Republic of Azerbaijan. Currently, the capacity of the line significantly exceeds the existing cargo and passenger traffic. The prospects for the growth of the cargo traffic, primarily with the transit of goods to and from Iran, which will be possible after the connection of the railway infrastructure of Iran and Azerbaijan within the Astara-Rasht-Kazvin transport corridor under construction. V 2019 the Iron Horns 1,5 million people (0,09 % the Russian Federation and 14,2 % from the SCFO). According to this indicator, the republic occupied 65place in the country, and 2- the place in the NCFD. V 2019 The railroad was moved around 1,5 million people.

Freight turnover and passenger traffic in the Republic of Dagestan during the analyzed period had a contradictory dynamics - the periods of growth of the corresponding respondents were combined with periods of significant decline - Table 1.2.24.

Table 1.2.24. Freight and passenger traffic on the RD in 2010-2020gg, in % to the previous year.

0 1 0 2

1 , 4 9

1 , 3 8

9 , 5 0 1

1 1 0 2

1 , 0 0 1

8 , 0 8 1

1 , 7 7

2 1 0 2

2 , 3 0 1

3 , 2 8

1 , 6 0 1

3 1 0 2

9 , 8 9

9 , 6 1 1

7 , 4 0 1

4 1 0 2

7 , 5 0 1

0 , 3 0 1

5 1 0 2

0 , 7 0 1

0 , 2 6

7 , 8 7

8 , 7 7

6 1 0 2

1 , 4 0 1

6 , 7 1 1

2 , 8 0 1

7 1 0 2

5 , 4 0 1

5 , 2 1 1

0 , 7 0 1

8 1 0 2

1 , 5 2 1

0 , 6 0 1

5 , 9 1 1

9 1 0 2

1 , 9 6

0 , 1 0 1

0 , 6 1 1

0 2 0 2

1 , 6 2 1

.

.

Dr N

.

.

Dr N

g 0 2 0 2

- 0 1 0 2

4 9 , 8 2 1

* * 5 7 , 0 3 1

* * 1 , 8 8

Freight turnover of all types of transport, mln. ton-km*

Transportation (departure) of goods by rail (wide co-layee), thousand tons of passengers Departure by rail transport port of general use, thousand people Passenger turnover of motor transport, million passengers-km

7 , 4 0 1

6 , 4 0 1

6 , 3 7

4 , 7 9 *Clarified. **Without 2020 Mr. The Republic of Dagestan in terms of transportation of goods by road transport (5,4 million tons) is in 3- the place according to the North Federal District, on the turnover of road transport (482 Millions of ton-km 2- the same results for the dispatch of passengers by rail, as well as for the carriage of passengers by public buses and passenger traffic of public buses.

1 , 6 4

8 , 7 6

4 , 2 7

3 , 6 4

8 , 7 1 1

5 , 0 5 1

3 , 5 3 1

7 , 8 0 1

53

During the period, the region’s foreign trade turnover decreased from 541,3 million to 164,4 million.

US dollars, or by 69,4% (Table 1.2.25.), including:

Countries outside the CIS - with 314,4 Millions before 95,2 Millions of dollars the United States or 69,7%. Exports as Exports to 55,3% (with 126,0 to 56,3 Millions of dollars United States and imports of 74% (with 415,3 to 101,8 Millions of dollars USA).

the CIS countries - with 226,9 to 71,4 Millions of dollars the United States or 68,5%. However, the decrease is due to a decrease in imports of 207,0 to 28,3 Millions of dollars United States or nearly 86%. Exports have increased over the period 20,0 to 40,9 Millions of dollars the United States or 205%.

Table 1.2.25. Dynamics of foreign trade turnover of the Republic of Dagestan in 2010-

2020, ths dollars USA

Foreign trade turnover - total including export import Foreign trade turnover with countries outside the CIS including export import Foreign trade turnover with the CIS countries including export

2010 541,3

2015 344,5

2020 164,4

126,0 415,3 314,4

106,1 208,4 226,9

51,7 292,9 171,4

27,6 143,8 173,2

20,0 207,0

24,1 149,1

56,3 108,1 95,2

15,4 79,8 69,2

40,9 28,3

2020/2010 in % 30,4

44,7 26,0 30,3

14,5 38,3 30,5

205,1 13,7

1.2.4. Spatial development and preferential territories

Northern Dagestan includes the cities of Kizlyar and Yuzhno-Sukhokumsk and the municipal districts of Nogaysky, Kizlyarsky, Tarumovsky and Babayurtovsky. It is primarily an agro-industrial territorial zone, but also has developed industrial functions, with defence-industry complex (OBK) facilities in the urban okrugs of Yuzhno-Sukhokumsk and Kizlyar. Its principal territorial parameters, here and below as of the beginning of 2020, are: area, 18.5 thousand square kilometres, or 36.6% of the Republic of Dagestan's total area; population, 237.2 thousand people, excluding the population of the mountain districts' “kutans”, or 7.7% of the republic's total population; population density, 12.81 people per square kilometre. With 6.1% of the republic's population and 6.2% of its fixed-capital investment, the Northern Dagestan territorial zone accounts for 10.6% of the total turnover of enterprises and organisations across all types of economic activity in the republic, and 20.3% of the total volume of products shipped and services provided in industrial activities. This indicates the high efficiency of its economy among the republic's territorial zones.

Central Dagestan: includes the territories of the NGO "Makhachkala city", NGO "Buinaksk city", NGO "Izberbash", NGO "Caspian city", NGO "Kizilurt city", NGO "state Khasavyurt" as well as municipal areas: Babayurtovsky, Buynaksky, Kazbekov-sky, Karabudakhkentsky, Kayakavtorsky. Central Dagestan is a large multifunctional territorial zone of the RD with developed industrial, agro-industrial, trans-port and logistics functions, a construction base, a tourist and recreational complex, a business and scientific and educational center, the capital of the republic - the city of Makhachkala, with the development of military-strategic functions, with the presence of defense industry facilities and the Main Base of the Caspian Flotilla of the Navy.

54

It is characterised by a high concentration of the republic’s economic potential, including its labour, industrial, investment and innovation potential. The territory’s main parameters are: an area of 11.81 thousand square kilometres, or 23.5% of the territory of the Republic of Dagestan; a population of 1,797.7 thousand people, or 57.8% of the republic’s population; and a population density of 152.2 people per square kilometre. According to the “Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2025”, the Makhachkala agglomeration is a promising territory for economic growth of federal significance.

In the agricultural specialization of the republic occupies a strong position in the production of meat (54,2% from all-republican production), grain (30%). Viticulture is developed. Central Dagestan, with a population share of 57,8%, occupies in the total turnover of enterprises and organizations in all types of economic activity of the republic 64,6%: the efficiency of the economy of the territory is higher than the average in the republic - it occupies 2 place among the territorial zones of the republic.

In this territorial zone, the following economic zones can be distinguished: "Khasavyurtovskoy-Kizilyurtovskaya" (KKEZ). It includes the following territories: NGO "Hasaviurt", NGO "Kizilurt", as well as municipal districts Kazbekovsky, No-volaksky, Khasaviurtovsky, Kizilyurtovsky. In general, the economy of HKEZ is characterized by very low efficiency. At the same time, the situation with the effectiveness of the eco-nomination of the NGO Hasavyurt is worse: with a share of the population 4,7% from the Republican Party, and 3,8% of the total volume of investments in the republic, the turnover for all types of economic activities of the zone is total 0,4%.

"Makhachkala" (MakhEZ). It includes the territories: NGO "Makhachkala", NGO "Caspian city", NGO "Izberbash city", as well as municipal districts: Kumtorka-Lynsky, Karabudakhketsky and Kayakentsky. MahEZ: a multifunctional zone with a diversified economy, the presence of the Makhachkala agglomeration, with a high concentration of the urban population, a developed urban environment; one of the centers of the defense industry of the Russian Federation with the deployment of the base of the "Caspian flotilla" of the Navy of the Russian Federation; transport and logistics center, center of transit relations in the international transport corridors "North-South", "East-West"; medical center. It is distinguished by the presence of metropolitan functions and a high level of concentration of economic potential, administrative and managerial functions of both Central Dagestan and the republic as a whole. The makhaz in the agricultural specialization of the republic has weak positions (production of grain – 4,8%, Milk – 2,4% Meat – 4,6%). Wine growing and winemaking are developed and developed on the territory of Kayakent and Karabudakhkent districts. In general, the economy of the MakhEZ is characterized by high efficiency: with a share of the population 35,1% the number of its members, and 40,8% of the total volume of investments in the republic, the turnover for all types of economic activities of the zone is 60,0%; 2 place in the leadership group on economic efficiency among cities and districts of the republic.

Buynak Economic Zone (BuEZ). It includes the territories of: GO Buynaksk and Buynaksky municipal district. The economy of BuEZ is characterized as one of the lowest in terms of performance among the economic zones of the republic: with the share of population 4,7% Population of the Republic and 4,4% of the total volume of investments in fixed assets in the republic, the turnover for all types of economic activity of the zone is 0,2%; 9 Place from 10 efficiency in the economic zones of the region. The economy of Buynaksk is relatively more efficient - above the average for the efficiency of the economy among cities and districts of the republic. The economy of the Buynak district is one of the worst in terms of performance in the republic: with a share of the population 2,1% Population of the Republic and 3,6% of the total volume of investments in the republic, the turnover for all types of economic activity is 0,02%.

55

Key industrial production of the economic zone: JSC "Buynak Ag-regatta plant" (M. Buynaksk) is included in the consolidated register of organizations of the military-industrial complex and the list of strategic enterprises and organizations (FEA "Production of mechanical equipment" - the production of units and assemblies for military and civil aviation equipment); "Musharaka" Ltd (Mr. Buynaksk, Foreign Economic Activity: "Production of Plastic Plates, Strips, Pipes and Profiles".

Mountainous Dagestan: the territorial zone includes the main part of the mountainous territories of Dagestan. Includes the territories of municipal districts: Ahvakh, Botlikh, Gumbetovsky, Gergebil, Unzukulsky, Tliaratinsky, Hunzakh, Sha-Mila, Tsumadinsky, Tsuntinskiy, Bezhtinsky site - form in the west of the territory "Unzukuly economic zone"; Akushinsky, Gunibsky, Kulinsky, Laksky, Levashinsky, Sergokalinsky - form the "Levashin Economic Zone" in the east. Territorial zone of Mountainous Dagestan, with a share of population 16,6% and share of investments 16,5% In the case of the Republic as a whole, the 5,8% in the total turnover of enterprises and organizations for all types of economic activity of the republic, which shows low efficiency of the territory's economy - significantly lower than the average for the territorial zones of the republic.

Southern Dagestan: the territorial zone includes the southern part of the coastal, foothill and mountain territories of Dagestan. Includes the following territories: NGO "City of Der-Bent", NGO "City of Dagestan Lights"; municipal areas: Agulsky, Dakhadayevsky, Derbent, Kaitagsky, Kurakhsky, Suleyman-Stalsky, Tabasaran, Khivsky - form the "Derbent Economic Zone" in the south-east of the territory; Ru-Tul, Akhtyn, Dokuzparinsky, Magaramken - form the "Samur economic zone". South Dagestan is one of the geostrategically important territories of the RD and the Russian Federation, with developed industrial (with defense industry facilities), agro-industrial, tourist and recreational and military-border functions. A regional feature is its location on the southern state border of the Russian Federation with the Republic of Azerbaijan: along the southern border of the municipal districts of the "Samur Economic Zone" is the state border of the Russian Federation with Azerbaijan. Territorial zone of South Dagestan, with a share of the population 19,5% and share of investments 16,7% In the case of the Republic as a whole, the 13,2% in the general turnover of enterprises and organizations in all types of economic activity of the republic - the efficiency of the economy is lower than the average for the territorial zones of the republic. In terms of aggregated industrial output (20,3%) The territory of "South Dagestan" is used economically relatively efficiently among the districts and cities of the republic. The territorial zone in the agricultural specialization of the economy of the Republic occupies a strong position in viticulture and winemaking, horticulture and horticulture, in animal husbandry (KRS), as well as in fish farming.

"Derbent Economic Zone" (DEZ). It includes the following territories: NGO "City of Derbent", NGO "City of Dagestan Lights"; municipal areas: Agulsky, Dahada-Evskiy, Derbent, Kaitagsky, Kurakhsky, Suleyman-Stalsky, Tabasaransky, Khivsky. In agricultural specialization, the SEZ holds strong positions in viviculture, vegetable and horticulture, livestock breeding (KRS). In general, the economy of the DEZ is characterized by higher average performance among economic zones of the public: with a share of the population 15,4% Population of the Republic and 13,0% of the total volume of investments in the republic, the turnover for all types of economic activity of the zone is 11,7%. Municipal budgets are still in a difficult situation in the republic, since their revenues are mainly secured by deductions from personal income tax. And the receipts of local taxes, as well as taxes under special regimes (USN, UTIS, patent, ESHN) are insignificant. And in the total amount of taxes and fees of the budget of the republic they occupy only 3-3,8% respectively.

56

Against the background of the continuing general low level of socio-economic development of Dagestan in comparison with the average Russian indicators, imbalances in the development of certain territorial zones, cities and districts of the republic are growing. With the growth of the population, this leads to chronic insufficiency of many objects of social and industrial purposes, including those with the conditions of production, work and maintenance corresponding to modern standards. For example, according to Dagestan statistics for the last two years, by districts and cities of the republic, specific investments in fixed assets (excluding budget funds) per capita were in the range of less than 500 rub. (areas Agul-sky, Akushinsky, Gumbetovsky, Botlikhsky, Kaitagsky, Kurakhsky, Tabasaransky, Rutulsky, Suleyman-Stalsky, Tsumadinsky and the cities of Dagestan Lights, Buynaksk) to more 10000 rub. (Untsukulsky, Shamilsky, and the city of Izberbash, South Sukhokumsk).

Preferential areas. the Government of the Russian Federation 29 July 2014 № 1398The cities of the Caspian and Daghestan Lights were awarded the status of monocities of the Russian Federation. At present, in the single-industry towns of the Caspian and Dagestani Lights, by decrees of the Government of the Russian Federation 24 March 2017 № 334 and from 11 December 2018 № 1508 Two territories of advanced socio-economic development (TOSER) "Caspian" and "Dagestan Lights" were created. The presence of the status of a resident of TOSED in single-industry towns implies significant tax benefits and preferences (reduced rates for contributions to extra-budgetary funds from 30 to 7,6%, zero rates of property tax and land tax, reduced rates of income tax – 5% During the first five years, 13% – The next five years). The minimum requirements for residents of TOSER "Caspian" are established in terms of capital investments – 5 million rubles and the number of jobs created – 20 units, for residents of TOSER "Dagestan Lights" by volume of capital investments – 2,5 million rubles, by the number of jobs created – 10 units. The State of the Union 1 July 2021 the TOSER Resident Register 17 companies, including 14 – the TOSER "Caspian", 3 – on TOSER "Dagestan Lights". Residents of TOSER "Caspian" in the framework of investment projects attracted investment in the amount of 360,85 million rubles, created 319 Daghe-Stan Lights TOSER residents attracted jobs 41,81 million rubles. investments and created 22 Jobs. In the framework of TOSER "Caspian" 2027 The year provides for the creation 3990 new jobs, attracting 35 Residents and 17,7 billion Ruble of investments. Accordingly, the residence-Tami TOSER "Dagestan Lights" to 2028 The year provides for the creation 1229 Jobs and Attraction 23 Residents and 4,8 billion Rubles of investments.

1.2.5. The state of the environment.

Modern processes of human activity and urbanization contribute to the depletion of natural resources, air pollution, surface and groundwater, soils, the disappearance of not only many species of plants and animals, but also entire native complexes. In general, the environment in the Republic of Dagestan is not satisfactory. The geological environment and soil cover have been significantly disturbed by dangerous natural processes. The total area of land in the northern zone of the Republic of Dagestan affected by desertification is 1,5 million heck-packs – 94,6 % the entire territory of the northern pastures and is assessed as an environmental disaster. In the northern zone, deterioration of the topsoil, loss of humus and decrease in the level of natural fertility of soils due to sheep grazing, and the onset of sands, have been identified. With sheep grazing rate 0,5 Head to hectare in the Republic, it is 1,7 head per hectare, and in some areas, for example, in Babayurtovskaya, reaches 3,3.

57

In addition, the number of sheep belonging to the residents of Nogay, Tarumovsky, Kizlyarsky districts is about 600 thousand heads, plus tens of thousands of heads of cattle and horses. With such loads, pasture circulation is quickly disturbed, and many areas practically do not rest.

The level of bacterial contamination of drinking water is extremely high mainly due to: contamination of water sources, lack of sanitary protection zones, treatment facilities and disinfectants, high wear of water pipelines and breeding networks (up to 90%). Extremely low iodine content in the external environment, including in water, causes a high incidence of en-demic goiter.

The quality of the sea waters of the Dagestani Primorye in the area of the estuaries of the river Sou-lacquer, as well as from Makhachkala to Izberbash, changes from "moderately polluted" to "dirty". In coastal cities and areas, the issues of organizing areas of marine water use (beach zones), the regime of which is regulated by regulatory documents, have not been resolved, the boundaries of the sanitary protection districts of the resort zone along the coast have not been established.

In cities and districts, the issues of sewage and wastewater treatment, problems of solid household waste management have not been resolved. With the development of vehicles and transport communications, the number of substances polluting atmospheric air increases. In the republic, the regimes of specially protected natural territories and zones are violated with a special condition for the use of territories.

Further deterioration of the environmental situation in the Republic of Dagestan jeopardizes the future socio-economic development. Environmental health and protection are associated with the solution of existing problems, the most important of which are:

- risk of emergencies related to natural disasters

and dangerous geological processes (earthquakes, floods, etc.);

destruction of the geological environment by dangerous natural and man-made processes;

cassami (slides, cliffs, erosion, abrasion, karst, mud, avalanches, etc.);

- local pollution of the air basin; - pollution of river and sea waters; - low quality of drinking water; - erosion, washing, disturbance and soil pollution; - reduction of forest area and deterioration of their quality; - erosion of the coastline of the sea; - weakening of the ecological framework; - poor condition or complete absence of treatment facilities;

sewerage systems;

- problems of waste management; - use of poor-quality fuel by motor vehicles; - non-compliance with zones with special conditions for the use of the territory; - lack of modern materials of engineering-geological and engineering-economy;

logical shooting.

In addition to the protection and rehabilitation of certain elements of the environment

Wednesday, in the territory of the Republic of Dagestan it is necessary:

- to continue work on the formation of a territorial system of environmental monitoring, the creation of an information and analytical center for processing information on the state of the environment and the use of natural resources, the regulation of the maximum permissible harmful effects on the nature of Dagestan;

- within the framework of the execution of powers in the field of environmental supervision of the Ministry of Natural Resources and its territorial structures, regularly carry out control and supervisory measures to comply with environmental legislation;

58

- to strengthen production and state environmental control over the potential

Environmentally hazardous objects;

- to ensure the conduct of a state environmental examination on all aspects of

the projects of the planned economic activity;

- improve the accounting and regulation of environmental impact on

enterprises of the republic;

- Develop and approve standards for maximum permissible concentrations of pollutants. For the entire territory, the maximum permissible concentrations for all patients should not exceed 0,8 MPC; and for health and recreation areas and resorts - 0,7 MPC;

- legislatively and on the ground to approve the boundaries of special use zones, including water protection and sanitary protection zones of water sources, as well as protection zones of resorts and medical and resort areas;

- licensing of certain types of protection activities

environment and environmental management;

- Continue work on environmental education and education of the population. Assessment of the ecological state of the environment in the territory of Dagestan made it possible to identify the territories characterized by: a relatively favorable state of the environment; a relatively satisfactory state of the environment; a tense state of the environment. Territories with a relatively favorable state of the environment occupy the southern mountainous and foothills of Dagestan. There are no serious violations of the natural environment in these territories. Here, in the future, there may be manifestations of violations of the geological environment associated with landslides, erosion, unresolved problems of household maintenance, the lack of certain necessary components in the waters used for construction. Areas with a tense state of the environment are confined to the city district. Makhachkala, Caspian and other large settlements. Environmental changes here are associated with possible pollution of airspace, surface waters, a complex of dangerous geological processes (slides, erosion, erosion, flooding), high man-made load.

1.2.6. A brief assessment of the effectiveness of implementation in the republic

Regional strategic documents and state programs.

The strategy of social and economic development of the Republic of Dagestan for the period up to 2025 was adopted in 2011 in the form of the Law of the Republic of Dagestan of 15.07.2011 No 38. The main goal of the Strategy-2025 was to increase the quality of life of the population on the basis of increasing competitiveness, sustainable economic development and security of the region. The second level strategic objectives were:

economic development - sustainable economic growth and ensuring competitiveness on the basis of synergy of international flows and industrial-innovative complexes;

social and innovative development - creation of complex conditions for the benefit of

half-time and safe life, work and creativity, recreation and sports of a person;

spatial development - balanced spatial development and integration into the interregional and international socio-economic space; institutional development - the creation of a competitive institutional environment,

Promote balanced sustainable development.

59

In the strategy-2025 Three scenarios for the development of the Republic of Dagestan were determined 2025 year - inertial, basic and optimistic, as well as indicators of the implementation of the Strategy. In order to achieve the stated objectives of the Strategy-2025 In the republic, a deep modernization of its economy was planned in three stages: 2011-2015Gov, 2016-2020Gov, 2021-2025Total expenditure In the framework of the Action Plan for the implementation of the Strategy 2011-2015 years, were developed and approved (decree of the Government of the Republic of Dagestan 27 December 2012 № 471) Social and economic development of territorial zones 2025 Year: year Makhachkala, North Dagestan, Central Dagestan, Coastal Dagestan, Mountainous Dagestan. On their basis, the Program for Economic and Social Development of Municipal Districts and Urban Districts of the Republic of Dagestan was then developed.

Strategy-2025 was adjusted taking into account: the results of the implementation of its first stage; adoption of the Federal law of the Russian Federation 28 June 2014 № 172-FZ "On strategic planning in the Russian Federation"; target indicators of social and economic development of the subjects of the Russian Federation and decrees of the President of the Russian Federation 7 May 2012 № 596-602, 606; the State Programs of the Republic of Dagestan.

The analysis showed that within the framework of the Strategy, the state programs of the RD were adopted and implemented, the Gotsatlin hydroelectric power station was commissioned, education and health facilities were built, the road network of the republic was built and developed, the airport, the railway station and the seaport were modernized, the MFCs were opened in municipal districts and state districts of the republic, the development of industry and the agro-industrial complex were implemented. At the same time, significant fluctuations in the world and Russian economy in the period under review, irregular financing of activities and insufficient investment, unbalanced state policy in the field of spatial development, a significant shortage of resources for the development of modern infrastructure, "cotyledon" restrictions and a number of other factors predetermined the lag in the pace of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan from the ones outlined in Strategy-2025. Therefore, despite certain results of implementation of the Strategy - 2025 in 2012-2020, out of 29 its target indicators it is possible to speak about achievement of three (planned values of the base scenario are exceeded), for two more values of the inertial scenario were achieved, for the majority of other indicators the current values are significantly lower than planned indicators even of the inertial scenario8. Positive changes were achieved, first of all, in the growth of the population, housing per capita, increasing revenues of the consolidated budget of the region, and the development of tourism.

State Program of the Russian Federation "Development of the North Caucasus Federal District" for the period up to 2025 The implementation plan was approved by the Government of Russia 15 April 2014 № 309. It is the main tool for the implementation of the previously approved socio-economic development strategy of the North Caucasus Federal District 2025 Mr. The purpose of the state program was initially stated to create conditions for the development of the real sector of the economy of the North Caucasus Federal District, improving the quality of life and well-being of citizens. According to the program, budget allocations from the federal budget in 2013-2025 The years should have 264,3 billion RUR, including the RD development subprogram 2016-2025Gov – 24,73 billion rub. In fact, it was planned around the 8 billion rub.

8 By 3 out of 29 indicators evaluation cannot be carried out due to lack of published

official statistics.

60

The program was supposed to be implemented in three stages (conditionally): 2013-2015 - the first stage (preparatory, currently completed), when the priority measures are mainly social development and infrastructure, the completion of previously implemented federal target programs in the region.

2016-2020 - the second stage, when the priority economic development measures and

Infrastructure support for investment projects.

2021-2025 - the third stage - mainly the development of resorts in the North Caucasus Federal District, reducing the amount of funding from the federal budget, increasing the participation of institutions of development, repayment of funds, as well as active attraction of private investment. The implementation of Strategy-2025 of the NCFD over the past period did not provide the republic (as well as other subjects of the Russian Federation of the NCFD) with a faster pace of socio-economic development, as originally stated, a comprehensive solution of issues related to the creation of conditions for the socio-economic development of the region: it was not possible to reverse the trend of lagging in such indicators as the development of industrial production, the production of GRP per capita, the appropriate rate of growth of housing. Various preferential regimes and benefits applied in the region did not ensure the inflow of investment and the creation of a significant number of new jobs; in many respects, the investment projects provided for in the initially Strategy-2025 of the North Caucasus Federal District - the construction of industrial facilities, schools, medical and health complexes, etc.

The Federal Targeted Investment Program is another important document within the framework of which targeted investments were made for the social and industrial infrastructure of the Republic of Dagestan in the analyzed period. V 2010- 2020In total, investments were sent to the republic 51,7 billion rub. (84,3% budget allocations), and the actual 46,7 billion RUB or 76,1% from budget appointments.

National projects of the Russian Federation. V 2019 the Republic of Dagestan participated in the 10 National Projects (48 regional projects), and 2020 The Year - 12 National Procts (52 regional projects: "Demography", "Health", "Education", "Housing and urban environment", "Ecology", "Safe and high-quality roads", "Digital economy", "Culture", "Small and medium-sized enterprises and support for individual entrepreneurial initiative", "International cooperation and export", "Labour productivity and employment support" and "Science". Financing of national projects "Labour productivity and support for employment", and "Science" in 2020 year was not provided for, and 2019 They were not implemented in the territory of the republic. National projects are implemented 17 Ministries and Departments of the Republic of Dagestan.

Taking into account the funds of non-budgetary sources of financing and local budgets, the total amount of provided funding for the implementation of national projects (hereinafter referred to as NP) in the Republic of Dagestan in 2020 G was 29,6 billion rub. (2019 St Petersburg – 21,33 billion rub.).

Of total budget appropriations of 27.75 billion roubles (19.89 billion roubles in 2019), the largest amounts were allocated to measures under the national projects “Demography”—11.82 billion roubles, or 42.6% (8.86 billion roubles, or 44.5%, in 2019); “Education”—7.76 billion roubles, or 28% (5.08 billion roubles, or 25.5%); and “Healthcare”—3.65 billion roubles, or 13.2% (1.74 billion roubles, or 8.7%).

V 2020 NP budget funds in the amount 27, 74 billion RUB or 99,9 % Authorized appointments (2019 St Petersburg – 19,88 billion RUB or 99,9%).

61

However, as before, during the year there was an irregular funding of the NP, and from the total budget allocation for 2020 Year actually mastered 21,39 billion RUB or 77,1 % (2019 St Petersburg – 9,82 billion RUB or 49,4 %). In addition, in 2020 g budget allocations for the implementation of the NP "Culture" have been fully utilized – 198,9 million rubles, "International cooperation and export" – 42,4 million rubles, "Ecology" – 74,63 million rubles, "Small and medium-sized enterprises" – 254,86 Millions of rubles, and in 2019 NP "Culture" (177,7 million rubles), NP "Safe and quality roads" (1 648,6 million rubles), NP "International cooperation and export" (45,4 million rubles). Mastering 95% and more in 2020 by NP "Health" – 3 472,6 million rubles, "Housing and urban environment" – 2 018,5 million rubles, "Safe and high-quality roads" – 1 786,4 million rubles. by NP "Digital Economy" (3,86 Millions of rubles) is used 83,0 pro-cent, NP "Demography" (9 120,6 million rubles) – 77,1 Percentage. Low level of development developed under the NP "Education" – 56,9 % (4 419, 8 million rubles).

In 2019, funding for 6 national projects in the Republic of Dagestan remained unspent: “Demography”—6,140.75 million roubles, or 69.30%; “Education”—3,522.96 million roubles, or 69.34%; “Healthcare”—6.6 million roubles, or 0.4%; “Housing and the Urban Environment”—0.74 million roubles, or 0.07%; “Ecology”—13.14 million roubles; and “Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and Support for Individual Entrepreneurial Initiative”—376.65 million roubles.

1.2.7. Features of the modern stage of socio-economic development

Republic - stage, type, technological basis.

The choice of priorities for the future development of the Republic of Dagestan and the opportunities for their implementation largely depend on the definition of the stage and type of socio-economic development of the region, as well as on the technological basis and stage of the cycle of development of the republic's economy. Currently, four main stages of socio-economic development of the region are distinguished in the world economic science. Their allocation is based on the ratio of sectors of the economy: 1. Primary stage: predominance of agriculture, forestry and extractive industries. 2. Secondary stage: predominance of the “secondary sector” (manufacturing, construction and transport). 3. Tertiary stage: predominance of products in the sphere of personal services (trade, housing and communal services, health care, etc.). 4. Quaternary stage: predominance of intellectual work (science, education, information technology, credit, etc.).

Based on the GRP structure of the Republic 2019 Year (see para. Tab faces 1.2.26.), The primary sector and the primary sector are 17,1 percentage of GRP, "secondary" – 26,9 Percentage of “Tertiary” – 40,7 percent and “quarters” – 15,3 Percentage of GRP in the region.

Table 1.2.26. Dynamics of economic sectors in the structure of the GRP of the Republic of Dagestan

State 2005-2019gg

2005 2010 2015 2018 2019

Primary sector (agriculture, forestry, mining) Secondary sector (manufacturing, construction and transport)

25,5 15,6 15,7 16,69 17,11

34,7 34,4 30,4 26,85 26,87

62

Tertiary sector (spheres of personal services - trade, housing, health care, etc.) Quaternary sector (spheres of intellectual labor - science, education, information technologies, credit sphere, etc.)

30,0 39,0 42,6 41,17 40,69

9,8

11,0 11,3 15,3

15,32

Thus, the Republic of Dagestan is mainly at the tertiary (post-industrial) stage of development with significant elements of the secondary (in-dushtrial) stage. At the same time, according to some calculations, about a dozen subjects of the federation are at the "primary" - pre-industrial stage of socio-economic development.

Assessment of the type of socio-economic development of the region. The industry of the Republic of Dagestan by the time of creation of key enterprises, applied technologies and nomenclature of products should be attributed mainly to the fourth technological order, the formation of which took place in the 1960- 1980Total expenditure The crisis of this system in the Republic has come 2010-2020Total expenditure It is obvious that the Dagestan public, due to the availability of natural resources and close to the average level of investment (47 the level of investment per capita), can be attributed to the average investment type of development with elements of innovative.

Typology of the regions of the Russian Federation on the structural and sectoral basis should take into account the modern structural features of the domestic economy and significant structural and sectoral shifts in the medium and long term. The above analysis of the socio-economic development of the republic shows that the Republic of Dagestan has moved to the number of regions of the country of agrarian-polyservice type. The dynamics of the consolidated structure of GRP according to the criterion of production of goods and services over the past 15 years shows that this situation in the economy of the RD is fixed - Table 1.2.27.

Table 1.2.27. Dynamics of structure of GRP of the Republic of Dagestan on production

goods and services in 2005-2019, %

Indicator

Gross regional product, including: 100,0 46,0 Production of goods - industry 9,8 - agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing and fish farming - construction Production of services (a) Market services: transport and communication

23,6 12,6 54,0 40,6 14,2

2005 St Petersburg 2010 St Petersburg 2015 St Petersburg 2018 St Petersburg 2019 100,0 100,0 38,7 39,2 6,63 6,3

100,0 41,7 7,2

100,0 41,0 6,5

15,1 19,4 59,0 44,1 9,0

15,3 17,6 60,8 44,9 6,9

18,1 16,4 58,3 39,5 8,1

16,63 15,44 61,3 40,8 6,89

trade and commercial activities for the re-sale of goods and services (b) non-market services: health, physical education and social security, cultural, sports, leisure and entertainment activities

26,4 13,4

35,1 14,9

38,0 15,9

31,4 18,8

33,91 20,5

7,7

10,0

10,9

12,2

13,2

5,7

4,9

5,0

6,6

7,3

63

With this structure of the GRP, the economy of the region, on the one hand, becomes more diversified, mobile and susceptible to changes, on the other hand, is increasingly dependent on the situation in the regional market, including the population of the republic, the level of income and savings of the population and economic entities, access of the population and economic entities to credit resources, the activity of investment activities in the region. The regional economy is becoming more vulnerable, which was most pronounced during the period of “covid” restrictions of 2020: at the end of the year, the volume of paid services to the population fell by almost 16%.

1.2.8. Stage of the life cycle of the Republic of Dagestan.

The life cycle of a territory is understood as a sequential change in the stages of territorial development within the framework of the dominant functional specialization of the territory (priority types of economic activity), which determines the level of its competitiveness and adaptability to the effects of external and internal problems. For the economic space, it is formed under the influence of trends in the development of the institutional environment (information approach). As quantitative criteria for determining the boundaries of the stages of the life cycle of the region, the threshold values of economic security proposed by leading scientists in this field (Glazyov S.Yu., Senchagov V.K., etc.) were used.

The corresponding system of description of the four stages identification indicators (the allocation of more is actually a further detail of these) of the life cycle of the Republic of Dagestan is summarized in the table below - Table 1.2.28.

Table 1.2.28. Life Cycle Stage Identification Indicators System

Republic of Dagestan (color indication - compliance with the indicators of the region)

Dynamics of indicators by stages of the life cycle

Nr. p/p

Indicator

Growth rate of gross output (GRP), % Average annual growth rate of labor productivity, % Natural population growth (people per capita 1000 Population growth (people in 1000 Residents)

Depreciation of basic funds, %

Unemployment according to the ILO methodology, %

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Education (transformation) High (medium) -(5-10) High (medium)

Stanovle

Development

Decline

High Average

>10

5-10

High Average

Low or high price <5 Low or high price

-(6-12)

>12

6-12

<6

Very high (average)

High Average

Low or high-grade

>20 (5-12,5)

12,5-20

5-12,5

<5

Very high (average)

High Average

Low or high-grade

>10 (1,1-2)

2-10

1,1-2

<1,1

Virtually absent 0-10 Virtually absent 0-1 High

Low

Medium

High

10-30

30-40

>40

Low

Average

High

1-1

4-5

High** Average

>5 Low

64

Share of investments in fixed assets in GRP, %

Fund ratio, %

Provision of doctors for 10 Thousands of people*, volume of emissions into the atmosphere from stationary sources, t/km Innovative activity of organizations, %

Housing size 1 inhabitants, sq. m

8

9

10

11

12

>10

30-40

25-30

<25

Low

<3

Low

<30 (<40)

Low

Below Average 3-6 Average (growing) 30-40 (40-55) Average (growing)

Above average 6-8

High

>40 (>55) High

High

>8 Average (declining)

30-40 (40-55)

Average (decreased)

<0,2 (growth)

0,2-0,5

0,5-0,6

<0,5 (fall)

High (medium) >50 (20-50)

Low

<20

High

Average

Low

>50 Average (Growing) 20-25

20-50 Higher 25-30

<20 The average (reduced) <25

* is based on intercountry comparisons. In parentheses -

Alternative values based on estimates of the shortage of doctors in Russia

**according to official statistics. However, there are serious doubts about the...

confidence of numbers.

At the stages of formation and formation, due to some inertia of social processes, the economic activity of the territory develops more rapidly than the social sphere.

At the end of the development stage and at the beginning of the decline, despite the economic indicators, social indicators supported by budget financing can remain at a good level for quite a long time. This statement accurately describes the period experienced by the Republic of Da-gestan.

The analysis of the values of the relevant indicators suggests that the Dagestani Republic is at an early stage of the decline of the current life cycle of the region’s economy, when certain limits of growth and development have been reached within the framework of the existing system.

To achieve a turnaround in the situation and enter a new cycle of development, a change in the development paradigm is required, taking into account the interests of the whole society and with the active participation of the population, business, regional and federal authorities and management.

At the same time, taking into account the results of the typology of the region on the structural and sectoral sign, it is also necessary to take into account the modern features of the domestic and regional economies and significant structural and sectoral shifts both in the medium and in the long term.

65

1.3. The place of the Republic of Dagestan in the socio-economic development of Russia

the Russian Federation and North Caucasus Federal District

The Republic of Dagestan in the Russian Federation occupies a special priority geo-strategic position in the southern direction. This is an outpost and the "south gate of the country" in the Caucasus. The Republic of Dagestan has a fairly large and diversified economy by types of activity. According to Ros-stat, according to the main indicators of socio-economic development, the Republic of Dagestan among the subjects of the Russian Federation and the Russian Federation is positioned as follows:

Table 1.2.29. Place of the Republic of Dagestan in the Russian Federation and the Northern Federal District

basic indicators of socio-economic development*

Name of indicators

Area Population by area 1 January 2021 including GRP per capita per capita per capita for urban rural development Investments in fixed assets per capita Fixed assets in the economy (at full accounting value; at year-end 1 Ruble of value of PF Volume of shipped goods of own production, performed works and services by own forces by types of economic activity: mining, processing production provision of electric energy, gas and steam; air conditioning water supply; water disposal, organization of collection and disposal of waste, elimination of pollution Agricultural products Area of agricultural land Poultry stock Sheep and goats Livestock cattle and poultry

Place in

Percentage of RF 0,3 2,14

SKFO RF 52 29,5 12 31,44

SKFO 2 1

1,3 4,64 0,76 35,9 1,39 65,2

28,25 34,68 31,3 99,95 39,5 125,9

0,52

25,46

23 2 34 81 18 46

49

145,2

122,9

9

0,04 0,1

17,0 9,9

0,31

11,5

0,14

9,3

2,25 1,51 5,25 20,55 1,69

10,15 28,50 4,95 1,39 2,91 0,54 26,14 0,32 9,8

26,93 27,38 45,61 55,89 24,0

58,63 77,28 24,62 21,33 33,89 15,6 59,88 4,64 89,9

53 69

65

69

14 21 2 1 20

1 2 3 23 7 43 1 44 2

2 1 2 3 1 1

2

3

3 2

3

2

2 2 1 1 2

1 1 2 2 1 2 1 5 1

66

The area of vineyards in the fruit-bearing age The amount of work performed by type of activity "Construction" Commissioning of residential and non-residential buildings, thousand sq. m Construction of residential buildings, sq. m on 1 people. Individual housing construction, provided by the population, sq. m for 1 people. Retail trade turnover

0,06 1,82 5,77 26,27

1,98 35,04 43,22 73,81

1,91

40,15

0,94

20,98

56,4

78,6

61,54

62,9

1,75

30,05

12,23

29,96

29 17 2 2

12

30

69

63

12

59

20

4 1 1 1

1

2

7

6

1

2

2

Wholesale trade wholesale organizations wholesale 0,14

The volume of paid services to the population

1,35

*Colour marking: 1-21 places - positions in the leading quarter of subjects of the Russian Federation in terms of the indicator (1 Place in NCFD); 22-42 places - positions above the average (2-3 places in NCFD); 43-63 Positions below average (4-5 the NCFD); 64-85 Positions - Outsider positions by the main rank of the indicator (6-7 places in NCFD).

Republic of Dagestan: in terms of population (01.01.2021g - 3133 thousand people) occupies 1 place in the North Caucasus Federal District and 12 place in the Russian Federation, and in terms of the absolute value of natural population growth - 1 places both in the district and in the country as a whole;

by GRP (2019 — 718.5 billion rubles): 2nd place in the district and 34th among

Subjects of RF. According to the GRP per capita, respectively, 3 and 81 places;

by volume of investments in fixed assets - 1 place in the North-Eastern Federal District and 18 place in the Russian Federation. In-

investment in fixed capital per capita - respectively, 1 and 46 places;

the Agricultural Products Industry – 14 place. The Republic of Dagestan 2,12% Population of the Russian Federation, produced 0,76% GRP of RF subjects, 0,46% Industrial products and 2,3% products of agriculture in Russia. The amount of work performed by the type of activity "Construction", in the republic is 1,9% from an all-Russian similar indicator. The Republic - Goes 1,3% All - Russian Housing, 1,2% Investments in the main capital, 1,8% Retail Trade Turnover, 1,3% The amount of paid services to the population. Favorable natural and demographic conditions of the republic led to a strategically significant position of the region to ensure food security of the Russian Federation. The rural population of the republic is about 5% rural population of the country and more than a third of the rural population of the North Caucasus Federal District. In Dagestan is concentrated around 1,5% Farming, more 5% cattle and more 20% Small cattle, around 6% Gardens and 27% vineyards in the fruit-bearing age of the Russian Federation. According to the NCFD, these shares of the republic are: agricultural land 27,4%; CRS 45,6%, MRS 55,9%; Gardens 43,2%; vineyards 43,2%.

In the structure of the GRP of the republic, the share of agriculture is about 15% (non-economic activities forestry, hunting, fishing and fish farming), which is almost in 4 This is more than the national average. The Republic produces 2,2% Crop production and 2,4% The country's livestock products. According to a whole group of indicators of agricultural production, Dagestan occupies a leading position in Russia and the North-Eastern Federal District: vegetables (more 10% All-Russian and almost 59% SKFO), wine-grade (28,5% and 77,3%, Fruits and berries, respectively (5,0% and 24,6%), Livestock and poultry meat (1,4% and 21,3%), Milk (2,9% and 33,9%), Wool (26,1% and 59,9%). Daghestan 1 place in the country for the production of cognac products.

67

The strategic direction of development of the agrarian-industrial complex of Dagestan is rice farming: in terms of production (113 thousand tons) - 2 place in the country. One of the drivers of the growth of agriculture in Dagestan is greenhouse vegetables, where there are already more than 700 hectares of greenhouses of different formats - more than 21% of their total area in the country.

The Republic has a sufficiently developed system of transport infrastructure (road, rail, aviation, sea, pipeline), which plays a serious role in the transport and logistics complex of the entire south of Russia, as well as favoring its further expansion. The key object of the trans-port infrastructure of the North Caucasus is the Makhachkala Sea Trade Port - the only ice-free port of Russia in the Caspian Sea, favorably located in the area of international transport corridors "North - South", "East - Za-pad". In terms of retail trade turnover per capita, the republic occupies 45 place in the Russian Federation.

Dagestan is rightfully called a sports republic, a center for the preparation of a controversial reserve in the national teams of Russia by types of martial arts. In terms of the number of qualified Olympic and World Champions, the republic occupies advanced positions in the Russian Federation and surpasses more than a hundred states. Following the results of performance at all-Russian and international competitions, Dagestani sportsmen 2020 the City of Conquest 749 Medals, among them: 225 Gold, 216 Silver and 308 Bronze. At the last Olympics in Japan, Dagestani athletes won 10 Meda - lei: 4 Golden, 1 Silver and 5 Bronze, including Paralympics 1 Gold and three bronze medals. At the same time, in the development of game sports, the Republic of Da-gestan lags significantly behind the average Russian level.

The socio-economic potential of the region and its components are in constant variability. According to periodic scientific and expert estimates for a fairly long period (since the mid-2000-ies.) Republic of Dagestan has significant economic potential, which determines its place in the second or third ten among the regions of the country. In terms of socio-economic development, the region, on the contrary, has long been in the 7 or 8 among the subjects of the Russian Federation with a weak or low level of development.

Analysis of a wide range of indicators that determine the socio-economic situation of subjects and rating assessments of the level of development show that the republic is currently in the fifth ten among the regions of the country (RIA Rating – 49 Place by results 2020St Petersburg9). Summarizing rating estimates of the quality of life of the population in the region show the place of the region in the sixth ten among the subjects of the Russian Federation (RIA Rating – 56 Place by results 2020St Petersburg10).

As noted by the Head of the Republic of Dagestan. Melikov, in his speech to the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, "there is a cutting eye discrepancy between the huge potential of the republic and the depressing quality of life of Dagestanis. The conditions of a significant part of the inhabitants do not meet the minimum requirements of the civilization11.

Such a situation is the most eloquent evidence of the need to develop this Strategy in order to consistently resolve the main contradiction in the socio-economic development of the region: a deep gap between the existing regional and the quality of life of the population.

9 See https://riarating.ru/regions/20210531/630201367.html . 10 See https://ria.ru/20210215/kachestvo-zhizni-1597462656.html?in=t . 11

http://president.e-dag.ru/novosti/v-centre-vnimaniya/na-500-m-zasedanii-soveta-federatsii-fs-rf-

proshel-chas-respubliki-dagestan

68

1.4. Key factors and opportunities for the development of the Republic of Dagestan

1.4.1. Internal potential of socio-economic development.

The results of the analysis, including SWOT and PEST analyses (see para. Annex 3) for the time being, that the main elements forming the internal potential of the socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan are the following:

1) population, numbering more than 3,13 million people, with a favorable sex-age structure and the prospect of further growth, mainly leading a healthy lifestyle, tolerant, with historically high patriotism and civic consciousness, entrepreneurial activity. These qualities can be strengthened by the development and implementation of measures aimed at encouraging and supporting general initiatives, promoting the development of small and medium-sized businesses.

2) significant operational reserves of natural resources (land, water, marine, biological, mineral, fuel and energy, tourism and recreation), which can be additionally involved in economic turnover. 3) economic and geographical advantages, expressed in a convenient transit location, proximity to the capacious consumer market of the South of the Russian Federation, the Caucasus and the Middle East, the presence of a long land border with the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Georgia with a relatively developed border infrastructure, as well as more 500 the kilometer coast of the Caspian Sea with access to the ports of the Caspian states from the cargo port Makhachkala International Airport (Uytash).

4) is a fairly diversified sectoral structure of the economy of investment-on-innovative type of development with the predominance of tertiary sectors (more than 40%).

5) relatively high level of development of housing and communal services, road transport, energy

Information and communication infrastructure.

6) the presence of agricultural, industrial, construction, trade and transport enterprises with production and technological competences and significance in the regional and Russian, individual - and international markets, with high potential and capacity to expand and increase the volume of production of goods and services, create new jobs, develop cooperation with small businesses.

7) agricultural land, a sufficient number of potential investment sites such as Greenfield and Brownfield, as well as unused land that can be involved in the circulation to expand the area of arable land, as well as the formation of attractive investment sites, including agro-industrial.

8) a relatively high level of development of the scientific and educational complex (including universities, secondary professional educational institutions, scientific organizations), which is the basis for training and providing existing and new enterprises with highly qualified personnel, as well as for the development of innovative activity;

9) high national-cultural, historical and spiritual-moral in the Tential of the Republic of Dagestan, the presence of a large number of monuments of history and culture. 10 significant potential for the development of interregional relations with the subjects of the Russian Federation of the North Caucasus Federal District and other subjects of the Russian Federation, as well as foreign economic relations and border economic cooperation (in the presence of related and divided peoples on both sides of the land border).

69

The use of the existing internal potential of social and economic development of the Republic of Dagestan is associated with a number of restrictions that can be lifted due to the development and implementation of a set of relevant measures and projects:

1) a significant decrease in the dynamics of the main socio-economic indicators of the development of the region in the period compared with the dynamics of their development in 1999-2009. 2) decrease in the dynamics of population growth and the total fertility rate and the marriage rate, late marriage of young people, a change in the model of a large family, relatively high infant mortality.

3) high unemployment rate, growing demographic load, outflow of students and graduates, significant migration outflow of the most qualified personnel to other regions (mainly to Stavropol and Krasnodar Krai, Tyumen Region, St. Petersburg and Moscow) and abroad, reducing the quality of migration inflow to the region.

4) clan- and national-tumor nature of distribution of the main assets of the republic and spheres of business activity, building relations in many spheres of economy and management.

5) increased administrative and bureaucratic and corruption pressure on

population and business, a high proportion of the shadow economy.

6) insufficient development and unsatisfactory quality of infrastructure in the state and municipal districts in the Republic of Dagestan, a high level of depreciation of basic infrastructure facilities of federal, republican and local importance.

7) increase in environmental threats, pollution of the sea and the sea coast, desertification of agricultural land, increase in the volume of production and consumption waste with a low level of utilization and resupply, low quality of drinking water and water treatment in the settlements of the republic. 8) high tariffs for connection to networks with the existing shortage of energy capacities in cities and municipal districts of the Republic of Dagestan.

9) high level of depreciation of fixed assets, in particular the social sphere (housing and communal, road infrastructure in most urban and rural settlements), low availability of social infrastructure facilities, as well as low comfort of the urban environment.

10) a high share of agricultural production in private households, low level of commodity and technical and technological equipment, the continuing degradation of the industrial potential of the region, stagnation of the construction and transport industries, insufficient level of development of trade, public nutrition, paid services.

11) weak technical and technological equipment and a high level of wear and tear of the agricultural, industrial and social infrastructure, technological lag of most enterprises and industries, which necessitate the need for modernization. 12) presence of monoprofile municipalities with high risk

deterioration of the socio-economic situation.

13) unfavorable investment climate, low level of internal investment opportunities (sufficient savings of the population and economic entities, credit resources), financial and budgetary and organizational opportunities for effective use of available resources of the territory, modernization and structural changes of the economy, ensuring its sustainable growth and development.

14) insufficient level of economic relations and cooperation with subjects of the Russian Federation SKFO, foreign economic relations, use of transport and logistics opportunities.

15) low level of efficiency of the system of state, municipal and

Corporate Governance

70

1.4.2. Major imbalances and imbalances in development.

Analysis of the main trends and problems of socio-economic development of Dagestan, assessment of the potential and limitations of its use allowed to reveal the following main imbalances and imbalances in development:

1) imbalance between the preferential orientation of the economy to the internal market of the republic with the supply of raw materials, materials and components for the production of goods and services from outside the region.

2) significant imbalance in production and consumption of fuel and energy

resources.

3) deep territorial differentiation of the level of socio-economic development: growing disparities in the level and dynamics of socio-economic development of individual municipalities, in the level and quality of life of urban and rural settlements.

4) the growth of environmental imbalances in the whole republic and in its separate territorial zones, including the sea and the sea coast, the growing problems with the collection, sorting, processing of MSW and industrial waste.

5) increase in the concentration of population, labor force and business entities in the for-peace Makhachkala agglomeration in combination with acceleration of depositing processes in remote parts of the republic, the formation of a trend towards the formation of a mo-nocentric region.

6) acute shortage of places in preschool institutions and general education schools, shortage of personnel in education and health care, low level of education and qualification of personnel.

7) growing competition for young professionals and qualified personnel from the Eastern mining regions, g. Moscow, Mt. St. Petersburg, the southern regions of Russia in terms of advantages in quality of life, opportunities for self-realization, comfort of the urban environment, quality of leisure, availability of modern places and level of wages.

8) imbalances between a significant number of the working population and the availability of jobs, the needs of the regional labor market and training profiles in higher and secondary vocational education, as well as between the requirements of employers for the quality of vocational training and the possibilities of educational institutions;

9) imbalance relatively high level of development of science and education in the public, on the one hand, and the level of interaction of educational and scientific organizations with enterprises of the real sector of the economy, on the other.

10) preservation of low budget security of the region and restrictions on the introduction and use of tax incentives for business and entrepreneurship, if it is necessary to implement an active investment policy and state support for investment and entrepreneurial activities.

11) the high role of small business and tourism in the creation of new jobs and

self-employment of the population with a large share of the shadow sector in these areas;

12) digital inequality availability of settlements, not provided with qualitative cellular communication and / or access to information and telecommunication network of the Internet, with the general high development of information and communication infrastructure in large cities.

13) weak development of interregional cooperation and negligible volumes of foreign trade in the presence of great opportunities for the development of cross-border trade and foreign economic activity in the presence of related peoples on both sides of the border, while maintaining strict regulatory regimes and tightening economic and other sectoral sanctions by foreign countries.

71

14) infrastructural and institutional restrictions of interaction in the border zone with the Republic of Azerbaijan (the state of checkpoints and related infrastructure, transport infrastructure).

The main possibilities for removing the above restrictions and dispro-

Development portions include:

1) Ensure the planned levels of funding for national development goals and the corresponding national projects in the republic; implement the planned measures funded by the Republic of Dagestan’s budget and by federal and regional state programmes, including the Russian Federation’s state programme “Development of the North Caucasus Federal District” for the period up to 2025; and implement the measures proposed in Resolution No. 85-СФ of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, dated 17.03.2021, “On State Support for the Socioeconomic Development of the Republic of Dagestan”.

2) expansion of participation of the Republic of Dagestan in federal state programs, federal investment program with the concentration of resources and attention on several breakthrough infrastructure, economic and social projects that can provide a serious multiplier effect for the Republic of Dagestan, including in the field of agricultural and manufacturing development, transport infrastructure, tourism and recreation, Makhachkala agglomeration, coastal areas, coastal areas, coastal development. 3) active use of new tools of state support and development of individual territories, including the creation of territories of advanced socio-economic development, eco-industrial and agro-industrial parks, etc.

4) cardinal improvement of the quality of the regulatory environment and improvement of the investment climate, removal of administrative barriers and administrative pressure on business in general and, in particular, on small and medium-sized businesses, creation of favorable institutional conditions, development of a special infrastructure for supporting entrepreneurship;

5) restart of industrial and innovation policy of the region in combination with the development of new forms and tools of state support for investment projects, the creation and increase of the efficiency of regional development institutions;

6) implementation of major infrastructure projects, including modernization and development of the airport Makhachkala and Makhachkala seaport, construction of bypasses of the cities of Makhachkala, Derbent and Khasavyurt, modernization of transit federal highways, development of energy infrastructure and gasification, etc.;

7) reducing the energy deficit of the territory due to the use of energy-saving technologies in the region, modernization of the power grid and reduction of super-regulatory loss of electricity, construction of small hydropower plants, development of alternative and renewable energy (solar, wind and thermal energy), bioenergy, solving tariff problems (last mile and cross-subsidy) to launch projects in the field of other energy.

8) development of water treatment infrastructure and improvement of drinking water quality, improvement of the environment and public spaces to improve the comfort of living for the preservation and enhancement of human potential.

9) creation of conditions for the formation of the Republic of Dagestan as a center of ecological and health tourism of all-Russian significance, preservation of biodiversity and natural landscapes, involvement of specially protected territories and objects of regional significance in the development of the republic, the tourism sector.

72

10) popularization and implementation of environmental programs aimed at the development of separate garbage collection, the development of waste processing enterprises and recycling of secondary raw materials.

11) overcoming the tendency to reduce the share of the younger generation and increase the share of older people in the workforce through the implementation of measures to strengthen qualified young personnel in the region.

12) the development of scientific and educational complex aimed at the formation of high-tech entrepreneurship and the preservation of highly qualified personnel, the formation of knowledge-intensive services in the field of health, recreation, information technologies.

13) technological modernization to increase the depth of processing of raw materials and production of finished consumer products by attracting, implementing and supporting investment projects aimed at creating the production of new types of products with high added value from local raw materials, the introduction of "green technologies" in industry.

14) formation of industry clusters (wine and cognac, glass, building materials, footwear, furniture, fisheries, tourism) through measures of state support, stimulation of cooperation processes and organization of joint productions, which will increase the intensity of resource use, competitiveness of products and services, concentrate production chains in the region and the added value produced by them.

15) promotion of products of Dagestan manufacturers under a unique trademark and through a single regional distributor, the organization of the supply of health and environmentally friendly products to the trade networks of large cities and countries.

16) development of interregional and international cooperation in the implementation of complex projects of environmental and tourist and recreational orientation, including interregional projects related to the development of tourism and recreation in the North Caucasus Federal District, on the coast of the Caspian Sea, in the mountain zone, etc.;

17) attraction of resources of cross-border and interregional cooperation at the federal, regional and local levels for the purpose of social and economic development of the territory, use of the potential of cross-border cooperation.

The population of the region is not satisfied with the quality of those services in which huge budget resources are directed. Among the most popular topics in the categories of "problems" and "needs" in the local print media are 2019-2020the Center for Management of the Region 2021 year unconditional "leaders" were water and electricity supply, garbage removal and disposal, health care, education and kindergartens, housing, dissatisfaction with the quality of roads, the population is not satisfied with the state of the house and yard areas, as well as the work of public transport.

1.4.3. Utilization of existing and creation of new advantages

The Republic of Dagestan is a priority geostrategic territory of the Russian Federation, an object of special attention of the federal center and a subject of the Russian Federation of a high level of interaction, which has a favorable geostrategic position, a natural geographical and transport corridor, a historically formed overflow of routes with the proximity of the main markets.

The Republic of Dagestan is a unique natural and historical-cultural territory, inhabited since ancient times, preserving ancient historical settlements and valuable monuments of history, archeology, architecture, culture, national diversity, folk crafts and its authenticity, with many natural features.

73

The Republic has: a variety of biosystems, including the Caspian Sea, and the biodiversity of the territory; high potential of natural and climatic, water and recreational resources, allowing to create tourist territories of world importance).

The Republic of Dagestan is favored by its demographic features - the continuing growth of the population and a high proportion of the economically active population. The further development of the republic depends on the level and quality of education and health care, the creation of modern and high-paying jobs, and the provision of adequate monetary incomes of the population. Personal and business security, high environmental quality should be very significant regional advantages. These factors contribute to economic prosperity.

The future competitiveness of the Republic of Dagestan will be largely related to: the development and more efficient use of natural and socio-cultural resources - the level of opportunities is estimated as high; with a consistent improvement in the structure of the regional economy, the use of significant reserves of economic resources and the improvement of business administration and project management, regional planning; with the development of market infrastructure, effective regional industrial policy, the volume of state and private investment, the degree of development of small business;

Prospective innovative structure of the economy of the Republic of Dagestan with the development of education, science, innovation, the implementation of sustainable development principles and integration into the global information environment. The promising export-oriented structure of the economy of the Republic of Dagestan is associated with the development of relevant industries in the field of agriculture, industry, the consolidation of competitive producers into clusters, industry associations, the creation of new competitive sectors of the economy.

The socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan will largely depend on how widely banking, insurance, consulting, investment and other institutions will be represented - they contribute to the introduction of innovative ideas, flexibility and adaptability of the entire economic complex. The availability of high-quality modern communication lines, the development of regional computer networks and network platforms, free access to the Internet - these factors have now become of the same importance as at the beginning of the century for regional development were roads, energy supply.

Within the framework of this stage of strategic planning of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan, the possibilities of how to make the most of the strengths of the region, and the weak ones - to neutralize or turn into advantages are considered. In modern conditions, it is important to determine regional advantages not only in the production of tangible products, but also in the sphere of services with prospects for their export: consulting, auditing, information, education, medical and other services in modern conditions can contribute to increasing competitiveness and progressive regional development.

1.4.4. opportunities to accelerate economic growth.

the GRP of the Republic of Dagestan per capita 2019 the City Council 231,9 thousand rubles - a little more 1/3 from the same level on average in the country. Compared to the period 2000-2009 Average annual growth rate of GRP in 2010-2019G is down from 13,7% to 3,4%, Compared to the period 2010-2014the World of Arts 2015-2019G is down from 5,8% to 0,8%.

74

Long-term growth slowdown may indicate achievement of

limits of growth of the current model of the economy of the Republic of Dagestan.

The stagnation (inhibition) of the economy of the Republic of Dagestan is also said: a) a significant drop in the growth rates of other main socio-economic indicators of the republic's development, starting from 2014 g; b) a decrease in the level of incomes of the population and economic entities, consumer and production demand, investment in fixed capital; c) low level of congestion of production capacities (at the same time, many investment projects over the years cannot reach the production stage and investment stage.

A significant factor in the slowdown of the republic's economy is also the low level of development of market segments of the economy, which does not allow to include significant amounts of resources in the economic turnover, attract investment, and develop priority economic complexes.

Currently, countries and regions of the post-cod world are actively searching for the paradigm of future development using mechanisms and tools of state strategic and indicative planning, with their spread to non-state segments of the economy. It is these approaches that have been implemented in the formation of Strategy-2030. They allow us to ensure balanced development, increase GRP and improve the standard of living of the population of the Republic of Dagestan.

This means that other key factors of economic growth come to the fore: increasing productivity and complexity of the economy, developing competencies, attracting private capital, creating export-oriented economies with high added value, increasing the operational efficiency of enterprises and industries, technological renewal and digitalization of all spheres of life and activities of people in the region.

In the new model of economic growth of the Republic of Dagestan, a special place is given to the promotion of competition and the leading role of private business. Competition will create incentives for the growth of productivity of enterprises, the development of competencies in the labor market, the creation of new jobs through the emergence of new enterprises. An additional factor of economic growth is the disclosure of the potential of the municipalities of the Republic of Dagestan. It is in the municipalities that land and property resources and human potential are concentrated. The involvement of local economic reserves and the improvement of human capital will allow, on the one hand, to maximize the volume of regional production and increase consumption markets, and on the other hand, to improve the quality of life of the population in municipalities. The development of tourism and export of products will expand the boundaries of the market, integrate into global value chains. Trade in foreign markets is not an incentive for increasing the competitiveness, complexity and diversification of the range of exported goods and services through competition with domestic and foreign producers.

The main directions (drivers) of qualitative growth of the economy

Dagestan faces, as follows:

- Increasing public investment in the region's infrastructure (should become a long-term trend, given the chronic underfunding in the past of the region's infrastructure development).

- Involvement in the economic turnover of additional resources and efficiency

the use of (land, water, mineral, fuel and energy).

- development of entrepreneurship, business, farming and development of cooperation;

75

- effective tariff policy that stimulates investment attraction

It increases the competitiveness of production.

- placing orders on existing production facilities and increase

physical volume of output;

- improving the competitiveness of production, the implementation of substitution policies

Importation of goods and export promotion;

- project and investment activities, increasing investment in the main

Catering;

- increased use of corporate governance tools; - increased productivity, increased production efficiency; - increased income of the population and stimulation of demand in the regional market

consumption (taking into account the low income base, market volumes, long-term trend).

A key factor in the successful launch of new growth drivers in the economic sectors of the Republic of Dagestan is the creation of an effective system for attracting and retaining private investment and increasing technological competencies. In the modern world, it is impossible to ensure sustainable growth of a sufficiently large and diversified regional economy, such as the economy of the Republic of Dagestan, without the availability of appropriate human potential. With a population of more than 3 million people and maintaining the pace of its growth, creating appropriate conditions for human development, the Republic of Dagestan has good prospects for accelerating economic growth.

At present, transformations of a fundamental nature, both in the conditions of people’s lives, factors, processes and production results, and in global and regional markets, will be intensified in the planned period in the country and the world. These transformations are mainly related to the transition to the fourth industrial revolution and the sixth technological order, the tightening of environmental standards and the requirements of the “green economy”. Changes in the basis of social production will be accompanied by the intensification of world geopolitical processes, as well as the emergence of new political and social phenomena, not always and not everywhere leading to progress. At the same time, there is a danger: lagging countries and regions can forever be left behind in future development.

The world experience of management and economic practice demonstrates the new role of regions as subjects of strategic goal setting and locomotives of social and economic development of countries. This is no exception to the Russian Federation. At the same time, competition between regions within the country is increasing: visionary management teams strive to create appropriate conditions for attracting and developing human potential, business, investment, modern industries, tourism and recreation facilities. Strong regions succeed in this and become even richer.

With the high turbulence of processes and uncertainty of the future, knowledge of strategic prospects allows regions to outline their own future, choose the right directions, focus resources and main efforts on them, and reduce risks. Since the initial conditions of the regions sometimes differ significantly, the recipes for choosing strategies may not be the same.

76

II. STRATEGIC TREATMENT

2.1. Mission of the Republic of Dagestan

The mission of the Republic of Dagestan in a narrow sense - as an idea (vision) of its socio-economic development, proceeds from long-term regional and federal strategic priorities and beyond the horizon of the Strategy-2030, goals and objectives of development, taking into account the unique features of the republic, its resource potential, historical role and place in the North Caucasus Federal District and the Russian Federation, as well as in the interregional and international division of labor.

1.The mission of the region consists of economic, socio-cultural and environmental components, ensuring an effective and dynamic combination of them, improving the territorial (spatial) and sectoral development of the region, as well as observing state and regional interests.

2.Economic development is one of the main components of the mission of the region, on which the solution of many other problems (social, demographic, national-cultural, etc.) depends, increasing the investment attractiveness and competitiveness of the region.

3.The social mission of the region is aimed at solving social problems and raising the standard of living of the population of the region, has a decisive impact on the development, without the participation of which any transformations of any direction in regions of different taxonomic rank are impossible.

4.The cultural mission of the region expresses the socio-cultural community of the population of the region and the country, is aimed at preserving and developing cultural identity, the fullest satisfaction of cultural (material, spiritual) needs of the city.

5.The environmental mission of the region characterizes the development and use of its native potential, the state of biosystems, as well as the level of environmental measures.

Taking into account the Strategy of Spatial Development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025, in brief, the long-term socio-economic mission of the Republic of Dagestan can be formulated:

1.Dagestan is a priority geostrategic territory of the Russian Federation and a key center of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation in the south of the country with a unique natural resource, historical, cultural and spiritual-moral nature, the most important demographic, scientific, educational, agrarian-industrial, transport and logistics, tourist and recreational functions, functions in the field of public health protection.

2.Dagestan is the territory of ensuring a decent level and quality of life of the population, sustainable economic, socio-cultural and environmental development, preservation and enhancement of spiritual and moral traditions, culture and national wealth of the peoples of Dagestan, including for their transmission to future generations.

77

2.2. Scenarios of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan in 2021-2030gg

The main options for the long-term socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan are determined by the level of development and intensity of the impact of the following key factors in their various combinations:

- the state of the macroeconomic situation in the country and the world; - the development of the human potential of the Republic of Dagestan (demography, health protection, education, employment and income of the population, cultural level and creative abilities, housing and habitat, etc.);

- the volume of investment in the development of the economy and the social sphere -

gion;

- the speed of change in the quality of the environment and activities, modernization and overcoming restrictions in infrastructure sectors (energy, transport, housing and communal services, etc.);

- the degree of development and realization of the competitive advantages of the region in the natural resource and historical and cultural potential, agriculture, industrial production, construction, trade and paid services, transport and logistics, tourism and recreation in the regional, domestic and world markets;

- dynamics of innovative and digital renewal of industries and spheres of economy,

technological processes, labor productivity;

- increasing trust and social justice in society; - the level of legitimation of the rights of ownership, use and disposal in matters of social security;

Melno-property relations;

- Development of institutions that determine business and investment

activity, intensity of interregional and foreign economic relations;

- the effectiveness of state and municipal management and the quality of

Interaction with civil society institutions. The socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan is projected under three scenarios. The possibility of a conservative scenario is based on the assumption of an unfavorable development of events in the world and domestic economy (prolonged crisis and stagnation, extension and further tightening of the sanctions regime in relation to the country's economy and activities in foreign markets, acceleration of inflationary processes, destabilization of the situation in neighboring states and nearby regions of the world, etc.), which can lead to a limitation of the volume of federal support, attracted resources. In these conditions, there is a high probability of the absence of positive transformations and stagnation in the economy of the republic, the actual preservation of its existing structure, and regional policy will be focused mainly on maintaining the stability of the socio-economic situation in the republic and leveling the negative impact of external non-economic factors. The scenario is characterized by a lack of growth or little sense of growth in private investment and the introduction of innovative technologies, low rates of labor productivity growth, a further reduction in the lag of quality indicators of living standards of the population from the average Russian indicators, and weak demand in domestic and foreign markets will have a restraining effect on the development of industries. In view of the limited budget resources, the development of infrastructure and bring it to a normative state will be extended beyond the strategic mountain-umbrella. However, social obligations will be largely met through the federal centre.

78

Under this scenario, if current demographic trends continue, the population growth rate will decrease, migration outflows will increase, and a slight increase in GRP will be combined with crisis declines. In the future, this prospect is not considered as a possible development scenario of the Republic of Dagestan, since the sixteen-year-old (taking into account the 2015- 2020The period of stagnation is a very unlikely event, especially after the recent crisis 2020 years. At the same time, within the framework of the Strategy, a new crisis at the border is allowed 2023-2024Total expenditure Such a development in its recent forecast assumes the Central Bank of the Russian Federation as a consequence of unprecedented quantitative easing of monetary policy by central banks of the leading countries of the world during the period of “coherent” restrictions.

The moderate-optimistic (or Basic) scenario is based on favorable conditions of macroeconomic functioning (with minor fluctuations) and a gradual increase in current positive trends. The scenario is aimed at improving the use of natural opportunities and internal resources of the Republic of Dagestan (geographical differences, natural and climatic factors, minerals, recreational resources) and at the priority development of the infrastructure, agro-industrial and resort-recreational complexes, characterized by an increase in the investment and innovation orientation of the economic growth rate, while the growth rate of the main indicators will be average 10-15 years. The scenario assumes overcoming crisis phenomena in the medium-term period and ensuring the regulatory state of infrastructure, using the national projects, it is also assumed a gradual transition to a new model of development of the country and the region. Under this scenario, the modernization of social infrastructure is being laid, which will provide conditions for improving the quality of human capital and living standards of the population. The scenario is also based on more optimistic assumptions regarding the dynamics of indicators of the natural movement of the population of the republic and migration outflow - the population of the Republic of Dagestan will increase at a pace close to the current one: 0,7-0,8% Annually and at the end 2030 G will 3359 thousands of people, and taking into account the relocation of the Caspian flotilla – 3392 Thousands of people The quality of public services and the effectiveness of public administration in general will also be improved. The key components of the Basic scenario are the implementation of national projects of the Russian Federation in the territory of the RD; growth in the number and welfare of the population; ensuring the normal state of infrastructure; moderate economic growth based on the agricultural and service and recreational potential at the current level (or some improvement) of investment growth and budget and financial support for federal prices. The GRP will increase the average annual rate of the index of physical volume in 6,22%, including: 2021-2024Gov – 5,5%, 2025-2030Gov – 6,7%.

The optimistic scenario is characterized by the intensification of economic growth factors and the stability of the dynamics of positive changes in the macroeconomic situation. It involves the transition to a new model of economy and management at a faster pace, the intensification of investment and innovation, spatial and environmental development, accelerated digital transformation of the regional economy. It is the best option to achieve the established priorities and goals of socio-economic development of the Dagestani Republic, and was called the Target scenario of the Strategy of socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan for the period up to 2030.

79

The essence of the target scenario - Basic scenario + Mobilization of internal sources + large-scale federal support; outstripping economic growth by a new effective use of the existing human, investment, innovation, management and integration potential of the republic with large-scale financial and investment support of the federal center and the implementation of breakthrough projects for the development of the republic. In the process of implementation of the Target scenario, large-scale attraction of federal and private investments will lead to the modernization and development of social and industrial infrastructure, as well as sectors of the republic's economy. New industries and export-oriented production will be created. The development of human potential, the use of innovative and digital technologies will contribute to the effective use of the region's resources and the growth of labor productivity. The qualitative change in the living and working environment, as well as the modernization and expansion of infrastructure, contribute to improving the level of economic development, improving transport accessibility and connectivity of the region and municipalities. In order to ensure the adequate functioning and development of the republic, the regional administration system will exercise its powers in such a way that all the processes taking place in it are carried out in a timely, qualitative and effective manner. The scenario involves the use of new advanced state and public management principles, and technologies focused on the final result and effective management of financial, material and human resources, including the project approach, effective cooperation of public authorities and civil society in matters of socio-economic development of the region. The scenario is based on the full implementation of all the goals and objectives set in the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation on 21 July 2020 № 204 On national goals and strategic objectives of the development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030 of the year”, the opportunities provided by the implementation of other federal and regional strategic documents, including the Strategy of the NCFD-2035. At the same time, at the start of the Strategy, the Republic of Dagestan considers it expedient to adopt a more “supplied” federal regional policy with a “pull-up” of the standard of living of the population of the region and a set of measures to stimulate structural changes. As the region is ready to scale up transformation processes, the most significant effect will be a powerful federal "investment intervention", i.e. the implementation of large-scale investment projects of both production and infrastructure nature within the Republic of Dagestan (SKFO). The target scenario is characterized by more favorable demographic trends in combination with high quality parameters of the standard of living of the population. Population by end 2030The target scenario is expected at the level of 3440 Thousands of people GRP will increase at an average annual rate 8,8%, in 2021-2024Gov – 7,17%, 2025-2030Gov – 9,97%.

80

Project materials · Full published text

Strategy of the Republic of Dagestan 2025

Source status: archive

The strategy of the Republic of Dagestan 2025 is a reference context.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/strategija-rd-2025-dagestana.html

Open on the site

The Government of the Republic of Dagestan

Project

Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Dagestan

Strategy of social and economic development of the Republic of Dagestan up to 2025

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, AV Investment Consulting Company LLC, 2011

This presentation was developed by AV Investment Consulting Company LLC and no part of it can be reproduced or transmitted in any form and by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording on magnetic media, unless it is authorized in writing by the Government of the Republic of Dagestan, AV Investment Consulting Company LLC.

Strategic consultant of the project:

Development strategy of the Republic of Dagestan up to 2025

Strategic pyramid - AV approach

External diagnostics

Internal diagnostics

Strategic doctrine

Real sector development programme

Development Program "Future Economy"

Development strategy of key clusters and complexes

Social development programme

Territorial development strategy

Development projects "economy of the future" (from 15)

Source: AV

Projects for the development of the real sector of the economy (from 30)

Social development projects (from 15)

The development strategy is developed in the form of a single multi-level document:

1. Diagnosis: 1990-2008, with an estimate

2010

2. Strategic doctrine:

Long-term plan up to 2025

3. Development programmes: medium-term

plans up to 2020

4. Mechanisms (measures system): portfolio

priority investment projects (from 60 units) and mechanisms for implementing the strategy at the level of key clusters and complexes, as well as territories.

Period of work: 9 months (4 sq. 2010 )

2 sq. 2011.

Form of work: joint

work of the working group (representatives of state and municipal authorities, business, science and public organizations) and strategic consultants.

The methodological basis of the Strategy is the consideration of the socio-economic system of the Republic of Dagestan in the context of 7 complexes.

Matrix: economic complexes - elements of strategy

Diagnostics

Doctrine

Mechanisms (measure system)

Trade, transport and logistics complex

Industrial complex

Agro-industrial complex

Construction complex

Fuel and energy complex

Socio-innovative complex

Tourist and recreational complex

Source: AV

The Republic of Dagestan occupies the area of the Eastern Caucasus, located on the north-eastern slope of the Greater Caucasus and the south-west of the Caspian lowlands.

Geographical location of the Republic of Dagestan

The Republic of Dagestan is the largest republic

North Caucasus: ? ?

the Square 50,3 Thousands of square kilometres from north to south – 420 km, from west to east – 216 km average height above sea level – 1 thousand m highest point - g. Bazarduzi (4466 m)

 

> Internal Russian borders: > Republic of Kalmykia > Stavropol Krai > Chechen Republic

Foreign Russian land borders:

The Republic of Azerbaijan

Georgia

?Foreign Russian Maritime Borders: ?Azerbaijan Republic?Kazakhstan Republic?Islamic Republic of Iran?

Turkmenistan

Source: Economic Encyclopedia of Russian Regions. Republic of Dagestan

Currently, the Republic of Dagestan is facing long-term systemic challenges, reflecting both Russian and global trends and internal barriers to development.

Strategic challenges

Increased global competition against the background of the formation of new growth points

World Economy "BRIC+11" with an emphasis on the special role of Asia and integration opportunities of the Republic of Dagestan.

Strengthening the role of the federal center and competition between subjects

Russian Federation. Creation of the North Caucasus Federal District.

The increasing role of human capital, innovation and modernization as the main factors of economic development, while reducing the influence of many traditional growth factors.

Exhaustion of the potential of the resource model of economic development,

based on pre-industrial industries and emphasis on the low cost of production factors - labor, fuel, electricity.

Source: AV

The Republic of Dagestan-2010 is a unique geostrategic location, a compact combination of sea, plains, foothills and mountains, saturated with natural resources of development and a growing, healthy population with leadership ambitions.

Competitive advantages of the Republic of Dagestan

1. Unique geostrategic position * (crossing trade and transport

logistics flows, sea and land state border).

2. Compact combination of sea*, plains, foothills and mountains saturated

natural resources for development.

3. Human Resources: A Growing, Healthy Population with Leadership

Ambition.

The exclusive competitive advantages of the Republic of Dagestan are:

A unique geostrategic position.

The presence of the sea.

Source: AV

Republic of Dagestan-2025 - dynamically developing subject of Russia, represented by competitive post-industrial clusters "Caspian HAB" and "House of Peoples"

Vision of the future

The Republic of Dagestan is a subject of Russia with high growth rates

Economic development and quality of life, the axial region of geopolitics and trade and economic integration in the South of Russia.

Republic of Dagestan - competitive cluster "Caspian HAB"

Synergy of international flows and industrial and innovative complexes that produce and process high-value-added products in high demand, including export.

The Republic of Dagestan - competitive cluster "House of Peoples" - a comfortable place for life, work and creativity, recreation and sports.

Hub (English hub, literally - wheel hub, center) - a large interchange and transshipment transport hub with the necessary set of services, having a suitable geographical location

Source: AV

Republic of Dagestan - competitive cluster "Caspian HAB" - synergy of international flows and industrial and innovative complexes producing and processing high value-added products, which are in high demand, including export

Elements of the cluster "Caspian HAB"

A well-developed trade, transport and logistics complex based on

redistribution of the main flows of Southeast and Central Asia, the Middle East and Europe, which creates special conditions for the passage of commodity flows through Russia and the possibility of their multiplication and accumulation.

Developed industrial complex based on production

innovative products.

Developed agro-industrial complex based on production

environmentally friendly products.

A well-developed construction complex that ensures the development of all

economic complexes and improvement of living conditions, tourism and recreation.

- Developed fuel and energy complex, which provides a growing demand for energy resources, which determines a special place for alternative energy.

Source: AV

The Republic of Dagestan is a competitive cluster "House of Peoples" - a comfortable place for life, work and creativity, recreation and sports

Elements of the "House of Peoples" cluster

A well-developed social and innovation complex based on

high-quality social services, knowledge and technology economy, developed innovation system.

Developed tourist and recreational complex (sea and mountain)

international resort with developed medical and health and scientific and cognitive components, which has the infrastructure that allows the Republic of Dagestan to become a business center of the Caspian region).

“Bet on growth” of the quality of human capital.

Source: AV

The main strategic goal is to increase the quality of life of the population based on increasing the competitiveness of the region, sustainable economic development and security.

The implementation of the main strategic goal will allow to achieve the level of economic and social development corresponding to the status of the Republic of Dagestan as an advanced subject of the Russian Federation of the XXI century. In 2020-2025, the republic should enter the top twenty subjects-leaders in terms of gross regional product and human development index.

Strategic objectives

Economic development - sustainable economic growth and provision

competitiveness based on the synergy of international flows and industrial and innovative complexes.

Social and innovative development - creation of complex conditions for a prosperous and safe life, work and creativity, recreation and sports of a person.

Spatial development - balanced spatial development and integration into the interregional and international socio-economic space.

Institutional development - creation of a competitive institutional

An environment conducive to balanced sustainable development.

Source: AV

The implementation of strategic goals is interconnected and largely depends on the creation of a highly competitive institutional environment.

Strategic objectives

Economic development - sustainable economic growth and ensuring competitiveness based on the synergy of international flows and industrial innovation complexes

SOCIAL AND INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT - creation of complex conditions for a prosperous and safe life, work and creativity, recreation and sports of a person

SPACE DEVELOPMENT - balanced spatial development and integration into interregional and international socio-economic space

INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT - creating a competitive institutional environment that promotes balanced sustainable development

Source: AV

The implementation of the main strategic goal will allow to achieve the level of economic and social development corresponding to the status of the Republic of Dagestan as an advanced subject of the Russian Federation of the XXI century. In 2020-2025, the republic should enter the top twenty subjects-leaders in terms of gross regional product and human development index.

Benchmarks 2025

Gross regional product – 1,059 trillion rub.

Level of the region 20-ki 2025 c. from above 1 trillion rub.

Human Development Index - 0,887.

The level of the region 20-ki 2025 - over - 0,850.

According to the optimistic development scenario (in assessing the dynamics of development of the leading regions, forecasts of the development of the subjects of the Russian Federation up to 2025 were applied.

Source: AV

Achieving the level of economic and social development corresponding to the status of the Republic of Dagestan as an advanced subject of the Russian Federation XXI centuries, possibly as a result of multi-level modernization

The development of the Republic of Dagestan in 2011-2025 will take place in four stages

The first stage (2011-2012) is based on the implementation and expansion of those competitive

advantages that the economy of the Republic of Dagestan has in traditional areas in order to increase the efficiency of the resource economy and form the prerequisites for a sustainable industrial development model. At this stage, the foundations of institutional development will be laid. It will be necessary to implement a “set of tough measures”: legalization of business, increasing the level of security.

The second stage (2013-2015) is based on the formation of a sustainable industrial model

development and creation of prerequisites for post-industrial development. Institutional conditions and technological groundwork will be created to ensure a systemic transfer of the economy to the post-industrial (innovative) development mode at the next stage.

The third stage (2016 - 2020) - a breakthrough in improving the competitiveness of the economy on the basis of

its transition to a new post-industrial model of development, improving the quality of human potential and the social environment, structural diversification of the economy.

The fourth stage (2021-2025 and beyond) will be aimed at consolidating the post-industrial model of development and achieving the position of the leader on the basis of transforming innovation into a leading factor of economic growth, the formation of a balanced social structure of society. The accumulated potential of knowledge and capital, corresponding to advanced economies, will determine the preservation of trends of sustainable socio-economic development of the Republic of Dagestan based on the innovative “economy of the future” (having a powerful service sector) as the main driving force of economic growth.

Source: AV

The implementation of the Strategy will ensure the Republic of Dagestan to achieve the following indicators

Basic economic indicators for the implementation of the Scenario Strategy

Indicator

Inerz.

Basic

Optimum.

Population (2025), thousand people

GRP (2025), million rubles

GRP per capita (2025), ths rubles

Increase in GRP (2025 to 2008 g.), million rubles.

Growth rate of GRP (average annual) (2025), %

3 008

692 394

230

481 134

5,9

3 008

875 674

291

664 414

6,6

3 008

1 059 938

352

848 678

7,1

The average annual funding from all sources (for 2011-2025 years), million rubles.

100 784

137 368

174 486

Tax deductions to budgets of all levels (2025), million rubles.

81 504

104 358

129 062

Increase in tax revenues to budgets of all levels (2025 to 2008), mln. rub.

65 253

88 107

112 811

Revenues of the consolidated budget of the RD per capita (2025), thousand rubles.

Budget subsidies (2025), %

The average annual number of employed in the economy, related to economic complexes (2025), people.

The number of employed in the economy (including those not related to economic complexes) (2025), thousand people. The number of jobs created (2025 to 2008), people.

Labor productivity (2025), million rubles.

Labor productivity (according to DS) (2025), million rubles.

Unemployment rate (2025), %

Average salary (2025), thousand rubles.

Proportion of population with incomes below the subsistence minimum (2025), %

Source: AV

32,5

38

41,3

32

47,8

25

1 116 332

1 174 186

1 266 393

1 328

178 032

0,995

0,620

10,1

21,9

8,3

1 344

235 886

1,194

0,746

9,0

25,9

6,9

1 374

328 093

1,351

0,837

7,0

34,8

5,8

Development and restructuring of the economy of the Republic of Dagestan

Main economic indicators - 2008

Main economic indicators - 2025

* tax payments to the budget system of the Russian Federation, directly related to types of economic activity

agro-industrial complex; PC - industrial complex; Fuel and energy complex; SK - construction complex; TTLK - trade, transport and logistics complex; TRK - tourist and recreational complex; SIK - social and innovative complex

Source: Dagestanstat, Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Dagestan, AV Analytics

Number of employees, persons.Production, mln.rub.Investments in fixed assets, mln.rub.TTLC91 88928%PC7 6472%APK52 12916%FEC11 8673%IC80 01824%SIC58 38618%TRK28 9979%TTLK30 23535%PC2 6363%APK6 5838%FEC3 0373%IC28 87233%SIC10 81912%TRK5 3436%TTLK195 90021%PC41 4004%APK270 90029%FEC10 0001%IC98 83111%SIC269 46929%TRK51 8005%Productivity, mln. rub./person Value added, mln. rub. Taxes, mln. rub.*0,4690,1850,1921,1870,8100,2170,560TTLCPCAPKTEKSKSICTRK0,00,51,01,5TTLK60 61129%PC3 7782%APK34 52716%FEC7 8024%IC51 50624%SIC38 99518%TRK14 0427%TTLK2 21317%PC4644%APK2 17516%FEC2 36818%IC1 45811%SIC4 41033%TRK1401%Number of employees, persons.Production, mln.rub.Investments in fixed assets, mln.rub.TTLC611 34436%PC209 38412%APK222 00513%FEC28 5652%IC258 36715%SIC256 56115%TRK125 1237%TTLK3 5294%PC1840%APK12 05915%FEC1 5092%IC34 68641%SIC22 12426%TRK9 99512%TTLK276 59522%PC117 1899%APK300 86524%FEC9 2541%IC149 29612%SIC322 72925%TRK90 4657%Productivity, mln. rub./person Value added, mln. rub. Taxes, mln. rub.*TTLK413 30739%PC108 29010%APK125 07812%FEC18 3292%IC158 33715%SIC174 03616%TRK62 5616%TTLK39 68732%PC19 56416%APK18 25114%FEC5 0624%IC15 68812%SIC17 25314%TRK10 5238%2,2101,7870,7383,0871,7310,7951,383TTLCPCAPKTEKSKSICTRK0,01,02,03,04,0 The implementation of the optimistic scenario of the strategy will ensure significant economic growth

Dynamics of basic economic indicators

Source: AV Analytics

IndicatorAbsolute increase (2008 -2025)Relative increase, when (2008-2025)Average annual growth rate (CAGR)GRP, million rubles.848 6785,09,95%The average annual number of employed in the economy, related to economic complexes, people.328 0931,31,78%Productivity, million rubles.0,9993,88,22%Average salary, thousand rubles.274,69,36%Tax deductions to budgets of all levels, million rubles.112 8117,912,96%211 260275 893411 745751 5071 059 938200820122015202020250,0500 000,01 000 000,01 500 000,0938 300987 6601 065 6801 173 5381 266 39320082012201520202025900 000,01 100 000,01 300 000,00,3530,4390,6301,0441,351200820122015202020250,00,51,01,57,69,815,125,334,8200820122015202020250,020,040,016 25119 33141 26784 966129 062200820122015202020250,050 000,0100 000,0150 000,0 The implementation of the optimistic scenario of the strategy will lead to a qualitative growth of the social sphere

Dynamics of basic social indicators

Source: AV Analytics

IndicatorAbsolute increase (2008 -2025)Relative increase, when (2008-2025)Average annual growth rate (CAGR)Provision of hospital beds (at 10 thousands of people.)30,41,42,19%Pre-school enrolment (%)24,61,93,72%Proportion of students in general education institutions 1- I'm on shift15,91,21,23%Total fertility rate (per cent 1000 population)1,71,10,52%Life expectancy at birth, years2,61,00,20%68,267,373,683,798,6200820122015202020250,050,0100,0150,028,628,437,246,653,2200820122015202020250,020,040,060,069,172,777,880,085,02008201220152020202550,070,090,018,319,519,719,820,02008201220152020202517,018,019,020,021,074,475,175,776,477,02008201220152020202572,074,076,078,0 Characteristics of economic development in the context of economic complexes

Gross regional product

Average annual employment

Source: AV Analytics

Average annual number of employees, persons.Structure of employeesTTLCPCAPKTEKSKSICTRK050 000100 000150 000200 000250 000300 000350 00020082012201520202025TTLCPCAPKTEKSKSICTRK0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%20082012201520202025GRP, mln rub.Structure of WRPTTLCPCAPKTEKSKSKKTRK050 000100 000150 000200 000250 000300 000350 000400 000450 00020082012201520202025TTLCPCAPKTEKSKSICTRK0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%20082012201520202025 Characteristics of economic development in the context of economic complexes

Tax deductions to budgets of all levels

Investments in fixed assets

Source: AV Analytics

Taxes, mln rub.Structure of taxesTTLCPCAPKTEKSKSKTRK05 00010 00015 00020 00025 00030 00035 00040 00045 00020082012201520202025TTLCPCAPKTEKSKSICTRK0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%20082012201520202025Investments in fixed assets, RUB mln Structure of investments in fixed assetsTTLKPKAPKTEKSKSKSICTRK05 00010 00015 00020 00025 00030 00035 00040 00045 00020082012201520202025TTLCPCAPKTEKSKSICTRK0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%20082012201520202025 Characteristics of economic development in the context of OKVED

Gross regional product

Section A Agriculture Section B Fisheries Section C Mining Section D Manufacturing Section E Electricity, Gas and Water Production and Distribution Section F Construction Section G Commerce Section H Hotels and Restaurants Section I Transport and Communications

Section J Financial activities Section K Real estate Section L Public administration Section M Education Section N Health care Section O Other services Section Q Activities of extraterritorial organizations

Source: AV Analytics

GRP, mln rub. Structure of GRPABCDEFGIKONMHL050 000100 000150 000200 000250 000300 000350 00020082012201520202025ABCDEFGOHNMKI0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%20082012201520202025 Level of budget allocation to 2025 G is down to 25%

Forecast of budget indicators of the Republic of Dagestan

Source: AV Analytics

* incl. sources of financing of budget deficitIncomes and expenditures of the consolidated budget, million rubles.The level of budget subsidies, %020 00040 00060 00080 000100 000120 000140 000160 00020082012201520202025Other income*Tax revenuesSubsidies of the federal budget77%70%53%35%25%0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%20082012201520202025The Republic of Dagestan has a competitive position in the foreign and domestic markets in a number of areas

I priority

Second priority

Freight transportation (rail, auto, water, air,

Pipeline Transportation)

> Transportation and warehouse handling > Wholesale and retail trade > Financial sector > Production of cars and components (assembly)

production, followed by localization)

Production and repair of ships ? Production of aircraft and components ? Electrical equipment, radio electronics (assembly)

production, followed by localization)

? Livestock (KRS meat and dairy) ? Vegetables and fruit ? Fruit and vegetable cans and juices ? Vineyards, grape wine and cognac ? Meat processing

Construction services > Construction materials > Real estate and utilities > Electricity (production, transmission,

distribution)

? Beach and sea tourism ? Health and wellness tourism ? Scientific and educational tourism ? Education ? Health ? Research and development ? Communication and telecommunications

? Light industry (shoes, carpet weaving) ? Jewelry production ? Chemical industry

> Sheep > Poultry > Dairy products > Drinking and min. water and soft drinks > Bakery and confectionery > Fish farming > Mining of non-metallic minerals

Oil and gas (products) > Fuel and energy minerals

Mountain tourism > Sports and entertainment services

Complex

Trade, transport and logistics complex

Industrial complex

Agro-industrial complex

Construction complex

Fuel and Energy Complex

Tourist and recreational complex

Socio-innovative complex

Source: AV

Republic of Dagestan - competitive cluster "Caspian HAB" - synergy of international flows and industrial and innovative complexes producing and processing high value-added products, which are in high demand, including export

Elements of the cluster "Caspian HAB"

A well-developed trade, transport and logistics complex based on

redistribution of the main flows of Southeast and Central Asia, the Middle East and Europe, which creates special conditions for the passage of commodity flows through Russia and the possibility of their multiplication and accumulation.

Developed industrial complex based on production

innovative products.

Developed agro-industrial complex based on production

environmentally friendly products.

A well-developed construction complex that ensures the development of all

economic complexes and improvement of living conditions, tourism and recreation.

- Developed fuel and energy complex, which provides a growing demand for energy resources, which determines a special place for alternative energy.

Source: AV

The cluster "Caspian HAB" is a synergy of a multifunctional hub formed at the intersection of the international transport corridors "East-West", "North-South" and industrial and innovative complexes.

Source: AV

Integration of the cluster "Caspian HAB" in the transport space of Russia will effectively realize the transit potential of MTK* "North-South" and create a competitive alternative to the Eurasian direction MTK* "West-East"

The most promising for the republic will be the development of transit traffic of the southern and southeastern directions of the North-South ITC, which reach the ports of Bender-Abas (Iran) and Aktau (Kazakhstan), as well as the development of a competitive alternative to the ITC TRACECA. In this case, the railway lines of the republic, the ICCP** and the ferry have a fairly good transit perspective.

Source: AV *International Transport Corridor , **Makhachkala Sea Trade Port

Competitiveness of Caspian HAB cluster flows

Comparative expert analysis of transport corridors

Transport corridors

Variant No1 "East - West" (China - Turkey)

Distance, km

Average tracking time, day

Average cost of transportation, thousand dollars.

20 ft. container

40 ft. container

Number of customs crossings

Time Factor

Price Factor

Partner factor/integration

Ball of 5

Final assessment (taking into account the weight of factors)

Notes

Dostyk (border crossing China-Kazakhstan - Aktau - Makhachkala - Novorossiysk - Istanbul)

5908

8,13

1375

2056

TRACECA (Dostyk - Tashkent - Baku - Batumi - Istanbul)

6091

8,38

1621

2423

Southern Trans-Asian Corridor (Dostyk - Almaty - Tashkent - Serax - Mashad - Tehran - Ankara - Istanbul)

5031

6,92

1171

1751

Variant No2 "East - West" (China - Ukraine)

Dostyk (border crossing China - Kazakhstan) - Aktau - Makhachkala - Rostov-on-Don - Kiev

Northern Trans-Asian Corridor (Dostyk - Chelyabinsk - Moscow - Kiev) Central Trans-Asian Corridor (Dostyk - Aktogay - Almaty - Volgograd - Kiev) Variant No3 "North - South" (India - Finland)

Bombay - Bander-Abas (for Indian cargo) - Amir-Abad - Makhachkala - Moscow - St. Petersburg - Helsinki

5848

8,04

1361

2035

5398

5769

7,43

7,94

1257

1343

1879

2008

6111

8,41

1423

2127

Bombay - Persian Gulf - Suez Canal - Odessa - Kiev - Moscow - St. Petersburg - Helsinki

10181

14,00

1980

3170

Bombay - Persian Gulf - Suez Canal - Gibraltar - Baltic Sea - St. Petersburg - Helsinki

14262

19,62

2025

3750

Variant No4 Alternative automobile corridors Aktau - Makhachkala - Buynaksk - Untsukul - Gotsatl - Tbilisi (Georgia) - Poti Border with Kazakhstan - Ozinki - Saratov - Borisoglebsk - Voronezh - Kursk - Krupets - the border of Ukraine

1002

1140

12,53

14,25

Zhatibai (Aktau) - Beineu - Kotyaivka - Astrakhan - Volgograd - Donetsk - Border of Ukraine

2032

25,40

Aktau - Makhachkala - Rostov-on-Don - Kiev

1267

15,84

2

3

4

2

2

2

3

5

4

3

3

3

3

4

3

5

4

5

4

5

3

3

4

4

5

4

5

4

5

2

2

5

4

3

4

5

4

3

5

3

3

5

3

3

4

3

3

5

4,30

The single customs union, the balance of trade margins for transport, port service, logistics and trade operations within the cluster "Caspian HAB" will reduce the through transit rate for transportation

3,60 Single preferential terms and tariffs, high

Capital intensity

4,40

Electrified 46% of all routes, technical barriers in Iran, ferry crossing in Turkey is required

4,30 Common Customs Union

4,40 Electrified 29% all ways 3,70 Shortest way from Asia to Central

Europe

5,00

2,70 Low delivery speed, high

Capital intensity

2,70 Low delivery speed, high

Capital intensity

2,70 Alternative TRACECA

2,10

1,80

2,70

Promotes the development of trade in transit regions, connects the regions, runs along the routes M29 and M4

Source: AV Analytics Note: weight of factors: time factor - 0,3, price factor - 0,4, partnership / integration factor - 0,3

Trade, transport and logistics framework

Scheme of objects of trade, transport and logistics complex

Source: Government of the Republic of Dagestan and AV

Trade, transport and logistics complex: redistribution and accumulation of international flows

* financial activity in the statistics of the Republic of Dagestan is not reflected

Source: AV Analytics

Volumes of financing (average annual) - regional budget, million rubles Volumes of financing (average annual) - extra-budgetary sources, million rubles Taxes in budgets of all levels, million rubles Labor productivity, million rubles Average annual number of employed in the economy, people Average salary, thousand rubles Production, million rubles Value added, million rubles Financing (average annual.050 000100 000150 000200 000250 000300 000350 00020082012201520202025TransportTransport and warehouse cargo handlingTradeFinancial activities050 000100 000150 000200 000250 000300 000350 00020082012201520202025TransportTransport and warehouse cargo handlingTradeFinancial activities020 00040 00060 00080 000100 000120 000140 000160 00020082012201520202025TransportTransport and warehouse cargo handlingTradeFinancial activities0,05,010,015,020,025,030,035,040,020082012201520202025TransportTransport and warehouse cargo handlingTradeFinancial activities05 00010 00015 00020 00025 00020082012201520202025TransportTransport and warehouse cargo handlingTradeFinancial activities0,0001,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,00020082012201520202025TransportTransport and warehouse cargo handlingTradeFinancial activities7 93120 75414 0331 34405 00010 00015 00020 00025 00030 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Federal budget2 0914 7104 00028505 00010 00015 00020 00025 00030 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Regional budget15 16226 4228 2425 39005 00010 00015 00020 00025 00030 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Extrabudgetary sources Industrial complex: development of mechanical engineering and production of electrical equipment, as well as the realization of the potential of crafts

Source: AV Analytics

Volumes of financing (average annual) - the federal budget, million rubles. Volumes of financing (average annual) - the regional budget, million rubles. Volumes of financing (average annual) - extra-budgetary sources, million rubles.Production, million rubles.Value added, million rubles.Taxes in budgets of all levels, million rubles.The average annual number of employed in the economy, people.The average salary, thousand rubles.020 00040 00060 00080 000100 000120 000140 00020082012201520202025Mechanical engineeringElectrical equipmentOther production010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00060 00070 00020082012201520202025Mechanical engineeringElectrical equipmentOther production010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00060 00020082012201520202025Mechanical engineeringElectrical equipmentOther production0,010,020,030,040,050,060,020082012201520202025Mechanical engineeringElectrical equipmentOther production02 0004 0006 0008 00010 00012 00014 00016 00020082012201520202025Mechanical engineeringElectrical equipmentOther production0,0000,5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,00020082012201520202025Mechanical engineeringElectrical equipmentOther production2 5808041010-4 0001 0006 00011 00016 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Federal budget183194195193-4 0001 0006 00011 00016 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Regional budget11 09014 6235 0283 04805 00010 00015 00020 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Extrabudgetary sources Agro-industrial complex: development of processing and promising areas of agriculture

Source: AV Analytics

Volumes of financing (average annual) - the federal budget, million rubles. Volumes of financing (average annual) - the regional budget, million rubles. Volumes of financing (average annual) - extra-budgetary sources, million rubles.Production, million rubles.Value added, million rubles.Taxes in budgets of all levels, million rubles.The average annual number of employed in the economy, people.The average salary, thousand rubles.020 00040 00060 00080 000100 000120 000140 00020082012201520202025AgricultureFishing, fish farmingProcessing010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00060 00070 00080 00090 00020082012201520202025AgricultureFishing, fish farmingProcessing050 000100 000150 000200 000250 000300 00020082012201520202025AgricultureFishing, fish farmingProcessing0,05,010,015,020,025,030,020082012201520202025AgricultureFishing, fish farmingProcessing02 0004 0006 0008 00010 00012 00014 00016 00020082012201520202025AgricultureFishing, fish farmingProcessing0,0000,5001,0001,5002,0002,50020082012201520202025AgricultureFishing, fish farmingProcessing2 5715 3743 4853 284-2 0003 0008 00013 00018 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Federal budget1 5663 6012 6752 146-2 0003 0008 00013 00018 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Regional budget12 71112 77612 56615 91605 00010 00015 00020 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Extrabudgetary sources Construction complex: ensuring intensive economic growth and development of production of building materials

Source: AV Analytics

Production output, million rubles Value added, million rubles Taxes in budgets of all levels, million rubles Labor productivity, million rubles Average wages, thousand rubles Average annual number of employed in the economy, people Amount of financing (average annual) - the federal budget, million rubles Amount of financing (average annual) - the regional budget, million rubles Amount of financing (average annual) - extra-budgetary.020 00040 00060 00080 000100 000120 000140 000160 000180 000200 00020082012201520202025Construction materialsConstructionMining (except thermal)Real estate and utilities020 00040 00060 00080 000100 000120 000140 00020082012201520202025Construction materialsConstructionMining (except thermal)Real estate and utilities010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00060 00070 00080 00090 00012345Construction materialsConstructionMining (except thermal)Real estate and utilities0,05,010,015,020,025,030,035,040,045,020082012201520202025Construction materialsConstructionMining (except thermal)Real estate and utilities01 0002 0003 0004 0005 0006 0007 0008 0009 00010 00020082012201520202025Construction materialsConstructionMining (except thermal)Real estate and utilities0,0000,5001,0001,5002,0002,50020082012201520202025Construction materialsConstructionMining (except thermal)Real estate and utilities1 6962 6401 4601 335010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Federal budget1 9181 8671 2701 249010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Regional budget34 47730 39236 49942 184010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Extrabudgetary sources Integrated development of fuel and energy complex

Scheme of input of objects of fuel and energy complex

Source: Analysis of the Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Dagestan and AV

Electricity development is an important resource for economic growth

Forecast of electricity production and consumption

Source: AV Analytics

Production and consumption of electricity, million rubles Losses in networks, %02 0004 0006 0008 00010 00012 00020082012201520202025Electricity received from other regionsElectricity generatedElectricity consumed0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%20082012201520202025Fuel and energy complex: development of oil and gas processing and realization of energy potential

Source: AV Analytics

Volumes of financing (average annual) - the federal budget, million rubles. Volumes of financing (average annual) - the regional budget, million rubles. Volumes of financing (average annual) - extra-budgetary sources, million rubles.Production, million rubles.Value added, million rubles.Taxes in budgets of all levels, million rubles.The average annual number of employed in the economy, people.The average salary, thousand rubles.05 00010 00015 00020 00025 00020082012201520202025Fuel and energy mineralsOil and gas processingElectricity02 0004 0006 0008 00010 00012 00014 00016 00018 00020082012201520202025Fuel and energy mineralsOil and gas processingElectricity01 0002 0003 0004 0005 0006 0007 0008 00012345Fuel and energy mineralsOil and gas processingElectricity0,05,010,015,020,025,030,035,040,020082012201520202025Fuel and energy mineralsOil and gas processingElectricity05001 0001 5002 0002 5003 0003 50020082012201520202025Fuel and energy mineralsOil and gas processingElectricity0,0001,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0008,00020082012201520202025Fuel and energy mineralsOil and gas processingElectricity2 5531 93810010002 0004 0006 0008 00010 00012 00014 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Federal budget61138821021002 0004 0006 0008 00010 00012 00014 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Regional budget4 9274 57512 6199 14602 0004 0006 0008 00010 00012 00014 00011-1213-1516-2021-25The implementation of the system of measures in the trade, transport and logistics, industrial, agro-industrial and tourist and recreational complexes will give a significant contribution to the economy in the form of tax returns

Ratio of financing, taxes and value added by complexes

Source: AV Analytics

circle size - Growth of GRP, mln. rubles352 696PC104 512APK90 551FEC10 528IC106 831SIC135 042TRK48 52005 00010 00015 00020 00025 00030 00035 00040 00045 000010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00060 00070 000Increase in taxes, million rubles. Amount of financing (average annual 2011-2025 RM, million rubles The Republic of Dagestan is a competitive cluster "House of Peoples" - a comfortable place for life, work and creativity, recreation and sports

Elements of the "House of Peoples" cluster

A well-developed social and innovation complex based on

high-quality social services, knowledge and technology economy, developed innovation system.

Developed tourist and recreational complex (sea and mountain)

international resort with developed medical and health and scientific and cognitive components, which has the infrastructure that allows the Republic of Dagestan to become a business center of the Caspian region).

“Bet on growth” of the quality of human capital.

Source: AV

Territorial and economic zoning, potential nodes for placing objects of socio-economic development

Number on the map

Name of municipal districts and urban districts

Name of administrative centres

Number on the map

Name of municipal districts and urban districts

Name of administrative centres

1 2 3 4 5

6

7 8 9

c. Tpig p. Akusha p. Karata p. Akhta

Aghul Akushinsky Akhvah Akhtyn Babayurtovsky p. Babayurt Bezhtinsky District Botlikhsky Buynaksky Gergebilsky p. Gergebil

c. Botlikh Mr. Buynaksk

c. Bezhta

26 Kayakentskiy 27 Kizilyurtskiy 28 Kizlyarskiy 29 Kulinsky 30 Kumtorkalinsky p. Korkmaskala

c. Novokayakent Kizilurt Kizlyar p. Vachi

31 Kurakhsky

c. Kurah

32 Laksky 33 Levashinsky 34 Magaramkentsky p. Magaramkent

c. Kumukh p. Levashi

10

Mr. Makhachkala

35 Novolaksky

c. Novolak

11

12

13

Mr. Buynaksk

Mr. Kizlyar

Mr. Kizilurt

14

Mr. Derbent

36 Nogai

37 Rutulsky

c. Tereckley-Meckteb p. Rutul

38 Sergokalinsky

c. Sergokala

39

Suleyman - Stalin

c. Kasumkent

15

Mr. Izberbash

40 Tabasaran

c. Khuchni

16

Mr. Khasavyurt

41 Tarumovsky

c. Tarumovka

17

Mr. Yuzhno Sukhokumsk Gumbetovsky Gunibsky

c. Mechelta p. Gunib

18 19 20 Dakhadaevsky p. Urqarah 21 Derbent Mr. Derbent 22 Dokusparin p. Usukhchai 23 Kazbekovsky p. Dylym 24 Kaitagsky p. Majalis p. Karabudakh - kent

Karabudahkents

25

42 Tlaratinsky

c. Tlyarat

43 Unzukulsky 44 Khasavyurtovsky 45 Khivsky 46 Hunzakh 47 Tsumadinsky 48 Tsuntinsky 49 Charodinsky

c. Unzukul Mr. Hasavyurt p. Heav p. Hunzah p. Agwali p. Kidero p. Tsurib

50 Shamilsky

c. Hebda

Source: Analysis of the Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Dagestan and AV

Caspian agglomeration Favorable economic and geographical location Makhachkala and Mr. Derbent at the intersections of major transport routes (North-South, West-East) is of paramount importance for the development and formation of them as centers of future agglomeration.

Source: Analysis of the Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Dagestan and AV

Social and innovation complex: emphasis on high human potential and innovation development

Source: AV Analytics

Volumes of financing (average annual) - the federal budget, million rubles. Volumes of financing (average annual) - the regional budget, million rubles. Volumes of financing (average annual) - extra-budgetary sources, million rubles.Production, million rubles.Value added, million rubles.Taxes in budgets of all levels, million rubles.The average annual number of employed in the economy, people.The average salary, thousand rubles.010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00060 00070 00080 00020082012201520202025EducationHealthcareState management, security and social insuranceCommunicationsNIROther services05 00010 00015 00020 00025 00030 00035 00040 00045 00050 00020082012201520202025EducationHealthcareState management, security and social insuranceCommunicationsNIROther services020 00040 00060 00080 000100 000120 000140 00020082012201520202025EducationHealthcareState management, security and social insuranceCommunicationsNIROther services0,010,020,030,040,050,060,020082012201520202025EducationHealthcareState management, security and social insuranceCommunicationsNIROther services05001 0001 5002 0002 5003 0003 5004 0004 5005 00020082012201520202025EducationHealthcareState management, security and social insuranceCommunicationsNIROther services0,0000,5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,0004,50020082012201520202025EducationHealthcareState management, security and social insuranceCommunicationsNIROther services12 13417 12218 86821 61605 00010 00015 00020 00025 00030 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Extrabudgetary11 29414 40314 04417 36705 00010 00015 00020 00025 00030 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Regional budget13 23019 63320 58829 68905 00010 00015 00020 00025 00030 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Federal budget of the Republic of Dagestan has significant potential for tourism and recreation development

Scheme of tourist and recreational zoning of the Republic of Dagestan

The development of the tourism and recreation complex involves the solution of a set of tasks affecting both structural transformations and systemic processes in the tourism and recreation sector:

- development of beach and sea tourism;

development of health tourism;

development of mountain tourism;

development of scientific and educational tourism;

Development of the sports and entertainment industry.

The solution of these problems is possible only with an integrated approach in which all spheres of social and economic life of society will participate:

staffing of the industry;

creation of infrastructure in the tourist and recreational complex due to the development of small business;

solution of tourist safety problems;

development of balneological base;

Attracting tourists to spectacular events is due to the level of development of sports and culture.

Source: Analysis of the Ministry of Economy and Tourism Agency of the Republic of Dagestan, AV

Tourist and recreational complex: realization of tourist and natural recreational potential

Source: AV Analytics

Volumes of financing (average annual) - the federal budget, million rubles. Volumes of financing (average annual) - the regional budget, million rubles. Volumes of financing (average annual) - extra-budgetary sources, million rubles.Production, million rubles.Value added, million rubles.Taxes in budgets of all levels, million rubles.The average annual number of employed in the economy, people.The average salary, thousand rubles.010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00060 00070 00080 00090 00020082012201520202025Services of hotels and catering servicesServices of travel agenciesServices for the organization of recreation and entertainment, culture and sports05 00010 00015 00020 00025 00030 00035 00040 00020082012201520202025Services of hotels and catering servicesServices of travel agenciesServices for the organization of recreation and entertainment, culture and sports010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00060 00012345Services of hotels and catering servicesServices of travel agenciesServices for the organization of recreation and entertainment, culture and sports0,05,010,015,020,025,030,035,040,020082012201520202025Services of hotels and catering servicesServices of travel agenciesServices for the organization of recreation and entertainment, culture and sports01 0002 0003 0004 0005 0006 0007 0008 00020082012201520202025Services of hotels and catering servicesServices of travel agenciesServices for the organization of recreation and entertainment, culture and sports0,0000,5001,0001,5002,0002,50020082012201520202025Services of hotels and catering servicesServices of travel agenciesServices for the organization of recreation and entertainment, culture and sports14 30818 17911 94415 25305 00010 00015 00020 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Extrabudgetary58349124822405 00010 00015 00020 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Regional budget3 3322 01591005 00010 00015 00020 00011-1213-1516-2021-25Trade, transport and logistics, social and innovative, construction and industrial complexes will become the basis of social development of the republic

Ratio of employment, productivity and average wages

Source: AV Analytics

size of the circle - Average salary, ths rubles29,0PC35,3APK16,4FEC34,6IC31,6SIC35,2TRK27,80,0000,5001,0001,5002,0002,500050 000100 000150 000200 000250 000300 000350 000400 000Productivity, million rubles/person Average annual number of employees in 2025 G., man. The Strategy monitoring process is an integral part of the strategy

The Strategy Monitoring Process

Objectives and objectives of the Strategy

Measures necessary to achieve the objectives

Expected results of the Strategy

System of indicators and benchmarks for assessing the implementation of the Strategy

Determination of the responsible performers and terms of monitoring

Identification of research objects (list of enterprises, processes, etc.)

Information processing (comparison with the expected results of the Strategy and the results of monitoring of past years)

Preparation and approval of the report

Adjustment of the Strategy

i and g e t t t t t S

and e t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t

Source: AV

Indicators

Indicator

2008

2012

2015

2020

2025

Volume of cargo transportation, million tons of cargo turnover of the ICCP, million tons of grain production, thousand tons of production of vegetables and potatoes, thousand tons of fruit production, thousand tons of grape production, thousand tons of livestock and poultry production (in live weight), thousand tons of egg production, thousand tons of eggs. Production of milk, thousand tons Production of bread and bakery products, thousand tons Production of meat and meat products, sausage products, thousand tons Production of fruit and vegetable canned food, mubs. Production of whole-milk products, thousand tons Production of canteen wine, champagne and sparkling wine, thousand dkl Input of housing, thousand sq.m Input of social housing, thousand sq.m Housing security, sq.m per person The share of emergency housing in the housing stock (of the total area of the housing stock), % Installed power generation capacity, MW Production of petroleum products, million tons Production of liquefied natural gas, million cubic meters Increase in electricity savings in physical terms, million kW*h Electricity losses in networks Total fertility rate (persons per year 1000 Infant mortality by major class of cause of death (persons 10 Number of doctors in public health institutions (thousands of people born alive 10 thousands of people.)

Number of medical staff in public health institutions (10 thousand people) Provision of hospital beds (10 thousand people)

Capacity of outpatient and polyclinic institutions (number of visits per shift by 10 thousand people)

126,7 6,4 281,6 1204,4 96,6 89,5 154,7 199,4 525,5 205,3 6,4 34,0 18,6 2 130 907 0 16,5 2,70 1 828 0,1 0 0 32% 18,30 13,00

39,90

83,70

157,1 8,5 340,2 1133,8 104,9 120,6 169,8 300,0 620,0 221,2 19,0 69,0 22,0 3 738 1 280 433 16,9 2,27 1 828 0,2 0 650 31% 19,50 14,00

40,00

84,50

223,0 15,0 375,2 1261,9 124,6 253,6 187,8 400,0 790,0 268,8 41,2 419,0 56,2 5 993 1 740 388 18,0 1,75 2 352 0,9 280 1545 27% 19,70 13,30

42,10

89,50

312,7 50,0 451,2 1761,0 191,9 555,4 233,5 512,0 847,6 332,2 58,0 706,5 74,2 7 428 2 913 880 21,6 1,23 3 168 3,0 280 2702 22% 19,80 12,20

47,20

96,80

438,6 60,0 556,5 2422,1 335,9 698,4 299,6 708,6 939,7 405,0 80,7 856,0 78,4 8 546 3 764 1 129 26,8 0,71 4 892 3,0 280 3591 17% 20,00 10,80

52,00

104,40

68,20

67,26

73,60

83,68

98,60

117,40

121,68

128,45

156,07

189,84

Indicators

Indicator

2008

2012

2015

2020

2025

Provision of the population with indoor sports facilities (sq.m. on 10 thousands of people) Provision of the population with flat sports facilities (sq.m. on 10 Proportion of population engaged in physical education and sports (%) Pre-school enrolment (%) Proportion of students in general education institutions engaged in 1Proportion of children with disabilities who receive education using distance educational technologies, of the total number of children with disabilities studying at home (%) Number of student places (thousand places) The level of involvement of young people in social practice, % Proportion of the population participating in cultural and leisure events held by state (municipal) cultural organizations Number of copies of the library fund of public libraries 1 Volume of discharge of waste water (million cubic meters) Emissions of pollutants into the atmospheric air (thousand tons) Share of enterprises implementing technological innovations (%) Share of the Republic of Dagestan in the Russian market of high-tech goods and services (%) Share of exports of high-tech goods of the Republic of Dagestan in the total volume of exports of high-tech goods of the Russian Federation (%) Share of innovative products in the total volume of industrial products. Beach and sea tourism, thousands of people. Health tourism, thousands of people. Mountain tourism, thousands of people. Scientific and educational, thousands of people. Number of places, thousand beds Number of festivals, pcs. Number of exhibitions, pcs.

0,90

5,75

7,60 28,60 69,10

1,02

1,06

1,24

1,37

8,70

10,80

13,10

15,10

9,00 28,40 72,70

12,00 37,22 77,80

16,00 46,58 80,00

20,00 53,23 85,00

n/a

35,40

99,90

99,90

99,90

392

n/a

33,00

393 18,00 35,50

398 20,00 38,00

417 25,00 40,00

439 37,00 45,00

3026

3116

3120

3150

3200

74,98 19,30 8,30 0,00

0,00

0,40

198 100 31 55 12 27 3 1

70,20 18,10 15,00 0,50

50,00 15,00 25,00 3,00

30,00 5,00 35,00 5,00

10,00 1,50 45,00 7,00

0,30

0,70

0,80

1,00

4,00

17,00

20,00

25,00

246 106 33 85 22 29 3 3

664 204 59 319 82 45 5 5

1396 641 203 385 167 84 5 5

2254 1193 404 445 212 132 7 7

Project materials · Full published text

EXONOR — SULEYMAN-STALSKY POLYMER PIPE PLANT

Source status: Project

The project of the polymer pipe plant is a production initiative of partners.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/eksonor-suleiman-stalskii-zavod-polimernyh-trub.html

Open on the site

SULEIMAN-STEEL PLANT OF POLYMER PIPES

Production

On the territory of the Republic of Dagestan, p. Orta-Stal plans to open the largest polymer pipe plant in the North Caucasus Federal District, in the region with the lowest growth rate of polymer production.

80 000

AREA OF ENTERPRISE

m²

MACHACHALA

DERBENT

C. ORTA-STAL

Development

The technological and production complex will provide 250 jobs:

OWN LABORATORY

for testing incoming raw materials and products for compliance with GOST and TU

TRAINING CENTER

for training qualified personnel

GARAGE CORPUS

for own fleet of trucks

FORMER CORPUS

for year-round residence of employees in the territory

10 production lines

equipped with the latest equipment from leading manufacturers Beier, ZhongYun and HaiTian. All products are manufactured in accordance with GOST and TU

Products

Polyethylene pressure pipes HDPE for water supply with diameter

110-1200 mm

HDPE Polyethylene pressure pipes for gas supply with diameter

110-315 mm

HDPE Smooth Cove Pipes for Diameter Water Supply

16-110 mm

Pipes HDPE corrugated double-wall diameter

100-1200 mm

Helical diameter pipes

1000-2400 mm

Drip irrigation pipes with built-in emitter diameter

16 mm

Corrugated double-layer pipes

2 production lines

Line No. 1 produced by corrugated double-layer pipe:

Line No. 2 produced by corrugated double-layer pipe:

ø100

ø150

ø300

ø400

ø500

ø600

ø800

ø200

ø250

Nominal ring stiffness of corrugated pipes SN: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 16

ø1000

ø1200

Scope of application

Industrial drainage systems

Sewerage systems in private households

Urban and auxiliary storm systems

Electrical communications, even near groundwater

Telecommunications laying, cable protection, including near the railway

Advantages of using products

Easy installation thanks to monolithic integrated bathroom

Resistance to temperature fluctuations

Impact resistance and resistance to external deformations and mechanical loads

Low friction coefficient of the inner surface

High dielectric index

High cracking resistance

High resistance to UV radiation and conditions of increased insolation

High resistance to chemically active and aggressive environments

Environmental safety during installation and operation

Self-cleaning of the drainage system due to a hydraulically smooth inner surface

Efficient operation in earthquake-prone areas

Specification: corrugated pipes

Modifications with a split without a splitter

Connection: docking

Fitting

d (inside), mm 100, 150, 200, 250,

300, 400, 500, 800,

1000, 1200

Product length 6 m or 12 m

Maximum effluent temperature: constant - up to 40°C

Service life 100 years

Laying depth up to 16 meters

short-term - up to 60°C

Smooth pressure pipes

6 production lines

Line No1 Pressure Pipe Manufacturing 16-63 (180 kg/hour16, ø20, ø25, ø32, ø40, ø50, ø63;

Line No2 Pressure Pipe Manufacturing 110-400 (500 kg/hour110, ø160, ø200, ø250, ø315, ø400;

Line No3 Production line 3-layer pressure pipe 110-315 (400 kg/hour110, ø160, ø225, ø315

Line No4 Pressure Pipe Manufacturing 200-450 (550 kg/hour200, ø250, ø280, ø315, ø355, ø400, ø450;

Line No5 Pressure Pipe Manufacturing 400-800 (800 kg/hour400, ø450, ø500, ø560, ø630, ø710, ø800;

Line No6 Pressure Pipe Manufacturing 500-1200(1 t/h500, ø630, ø800, ø900, ø1000, ø1200;

Wall thickness of each diameter of the pressure pipe: SDR: 26, 21, 17, 13.6, 11, 9

with blue stripe - water pipe for drinking water

yellow stripe marking - gas pipe

without marking - pipe for technical purposes

Scope of application

Pressure water disposal

Reconstruction of water supply

Construction of Dukers

Systems of transportation of chemical liquids under pressure in industrial enterprises

Domestic, industrial and urban water supply

Pressure sewer systems

Laying and repair of drinking or household water supply

Advantages of using products

Sanitary and hygienic safety

Ease of transportation and installation

Environmentally friendly material

Not Corrosable

Resistance to scratches and mechanical loads

Easier than metal analogues

Service life up to 100 years

Chemical resistance to aggressive media and substances: alkalis of any concentration, saline solutions, acids of organic and inorganic origin (including sulfuric acid)

High resistance to environmental cracking

Efficient operation in earthquake-prone areas

No deposits during operation due to increased material smoothness

Specification: Smooth Pressure Pipe

Standard dimensional coefficient SDR 9, SDR 11, SDR 13.6, SDR 17, SDR 21, SDR 26

Connection: soldering

Fitting

d (inside), mm 16 - 1200

Product length 6-13 m

Color of the product Color marking according to GOST

Service life 100 years

Raw material: HDPE 100

Working pressure: 6-20 ATM

Spiralled Pipes

Production of spiral pipes (SVT)

Pipe production is carried out by spiral infusing the hollow profile of the square section of the PND and connecting the turns with simultaneous extrusion welding on both sides. This increases the resistance of the product to static and dynamic loads at a relatively low weight and makes spiral pipes a modern alternative to traditional metal and concrete structures.

Spiral pipe production line 500 kg/h

Ring stiffness, SN: 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16

ø1000

ø1200

ø1400

ø1600

ø1800

ø2000

ø2200

ø2400

Possibility of reinforcement

Scope of application

Construction

Construction

storm and technical sewerage collectors

Pressure Dukers

Deep Sea Releases

Pressure water supply and sewerage pipelines

Construction, reconstruction and renovation

Urban and industrial collectors and sinks

Manufacturing

Construction

wells, reservoirs, storage and fire tanks for drinking and technical water or chemically aggressive means

drainage and reclamation systems. Waterworks: wells, pontoons, local treatment plants and sewage pumping stations

Advantages of using products

Lower installation and transportation costs due to the relatively light weight of the product

Lifetime - from 100 years

Low thermal expansion

Reparability

Frost resistance

High resistance to chemically aggressive environments, acids and alkalis

High dielectric index

Anticorrosion

Low hydroabrasive wear

High cracking resistance

Hydro-insulated connection

Environmental safety during installation and operation

Specification: Spiral Pipe

Hardness class SN 2, SN 4, SN 6, SN 8, SN 12, SN 16

Connection: soldering

Carving

d (inside), mm 1 000-2 400

Laying depth up to 12 meters

Service life 100 years

Raw material: HDPE 100

Pipes for drip irrigation

Production of drip irrigation pipes

A thick-walled tube from the primary HDPE, in which emitters (droppers) are built with a certain step for a uniform water supply with a specified flow rate. The addition of polymer impurities in the production increases the flexibility of products, stability to the conditions of increased insolation, provide long-term uniform watering due to increased strength.

Pipe production line for drip irrigation with built-in emitter, diameter ?16 mm

Scope of application

Industrial agriculture

Landscape gardening

Private or private subsidiary

Greenhouse or open ground

care for green spaces

for watering beds, flower beds and gardens

Fruit and Berry Gardens

Private or Industrial Purposes

Ornamental crop

nurseries of seedlings, plants and fruit crops

Advantages of using products

Increased flexibility to form the necessary geometry of the drip line

High cracking resistance

Environmental safety during installation and operation, does not cause soil erosion

Uniform irrigation along the entire length without formation of a jet

Water savings up to 60% compared to rain irrigation

High resistance to UV radiation and conditions of increased insolation

Resistance to temperature fluctuations - do not require cleaning for the winter

No physical costs when watering and con-trol by volume of watering

Specification: drip irrigation pipes

Diameter 16 mm

Wall thickness 8 mil (0,2 mm)

Pressure 1,5 - 3 bar

Step emitters Step emitters are set individually to order. 20 cm, 30 cm, 35 see etc.

Water consumption (by 1 Emitter): 2,0 l/h

Type of drip emitter

Denis Kaziev

Head of Sales

TEL. +7 (932) 090 00 02 SALE@EXONOR.RU

Republic of Dagestan, Suleyman - Staly district, p. Orta-Stal, st. Topoleva d.1.

Project materials · Full published text

EXONOR — PIPES FOR DRIP IRRIGATION

Source status: Project

The project for the production of drip irrigation pipes is a production initiative.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/eksonor-truby-dlya-kapelnogo-orosheniya.html

Open on the site

Pipes for drip irrigation

Suleyman - Stalin Polymer Pipe Plant

Production

On the territory of the Republic of Dagestan, p. Orta-Stal plans to open the largest polymer pipe plant in the North Caucasus Federal District, in the region with the lowest growth rate of polymer production.

80 000

AREA OF ENTERPRISE

m²

MACHACHALA

DERBENT

C. ORTA-STAL

Development

The technological and production complex will provide 250 jobs:

OWN LABORATORY

for testing incoming raw materials and products for compliance with GOST and TU

TRAINING CENTER

for training qualified personnel

GARAGE CORPUS

for own fleet of trucks

FORMER CORPUS

for year-round residence of employees in the territory

10 production lines

equipped with the latest equipment from leading manufacturers Beier, ZhongYun and HaiTian. All products are manufactured in accordance with GOST and TU

Products

Polyethylene pressure pipes HDPE for water supply with diameter

110-1200 mm

HDPE Polyethylene pressure pipes for gas supply with diameter

110-315 mm

HDPE Smooth Cove Pipes for Diameter Water Supply

16-110 mm

Pipes HDPE corrugated double-wall diameter

100-1200 mm

Helical diameter pipes

1000-2400 mm

Drip irrigation pipes with built-in emitter diameter

16 mm

Drip irrigation

In drip irrigation, together with moisture, plants receive micro and macro elements directly into the root system, and the root layer receives optimal aeration.

When drip irrigation is used, the interrows remain dry, which allows weeding, tilling or harvesting at the same time.

Drip irrigation has a positive effect on the soil itself - water erosion, leaching and salinization of the soil is reduced.

Drip irrigation Suitable for all crops

Especially popular is the cultivation of those crops that do not accept the irrigation of leaves - tomatoes, eggplant, sweet peppers, squash, etc.

Also drip irrigation significantly improves the performance of crops in a dry climate - grapes, watermelons, melons.

Suitable for crops in arid climates

for crops that do not tolerate the irrigation of leaves

Production of drip irrigation pipes

A drip irrigation tube with built-in emitters is a thick-walled tube made of high-quality HDPE, in which emitters (droppers) are built with a certain step to uniformly supply water with a specified flow rate.

The regulation of water pressure is due to a special labyrinth inside the emitter (dropper), which creates a turbulent flow inside the device and prevents the free flow of water.

Drip irrigation tubes have increased flexibility and resistance to conditions of increased insolation due to the addition of polymer applications at the manufacturing stage. This provides a multi-year uniform watering due to the increased strength of the products.

Production line for drip irrigation pipe with built-in emitter ?16 mm

Scope of application

Industrial agriculture

Landscape gardening

Private or private subsidiary

Greenhouse or open ground

care for green spaces

for watering beds, flower beds and gardens

Fruit and Berry Gardens

Private or Industrial Purposes

Ornamental crop

nurseries of seedlings, plants and fruit crops

Advantages of using products

Efficiency of water consumption during irrigation due to the lack of additional evaporation and loss of water

No sunburn on the leaves of irrigated plants - water is supplied directly to the root system

Reducing the spread of weed through selective root watering

Advantages of using products

Increased flexibility to form the necessary geometry of the drip line

Prevents soil moisture

Ability to operate at low water pressure

Preserves soil structure, prevents erosion

Advantages of using products 60

Uniform irrigation along the entire length without formation of a jet

%

Water saving

Resistance to temperature fluctuations - do not require cleaning for the winter

Compared to rain irrigation

High resistance to UV radiation and conditions of increased insolation

High cracking resistance

No physical costs when watering and con-trol by volume of watering

Environmental safety during installation and operation

The principal scheme of planting grapes

5 meters (between rows) x 2-3 meters (between seedlings depending on the grape variety)

5 meters (between rows) x 2 meters (between seedlings)

5 meters (between rows) x 2,5 meters (between seedlings)

5 meters (between rows) x 3 meters (between seedlings)

stub

Water tank or water supply

Hose

Crane

Stand

stub

5 m

2-3 m

stub

Installation method

Overground Laying of irrigation tube near seedlings and plants at the required distance

Soil Depth Bookmark - from 50 mm up to 60 mm in the planned root zone of the seedling or plant

Specification: drip irrigation pipes

Diameter 16 mm

Wall thickness from 0,7 to 1,2 mm

Pressure 1 - 3 bar

Type of drip emitter uncompensated

The step of emitters is set individually to order: from 200 mm to 5000 mm

Water consumption (by 1 Emitter): 2,2 l/h

Number of meters in the bay from 100 to 500

Denis Kaziev

Head of Sales

TEL. +7 (932) 090 00 02 SALE@EXONOR.RU

Republic of Dagestan, Suleyman - Staly district, p. Orta-Stal, st. Topoleva d.1.

Project materials · Full published text

South Dagestan

Source status: Project

Materials on South Dagestan - territorial direction.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/yuzhnyi-dagestan.html

Open on the site

"Kavkaz.RF" 2028 The Year of Investing 14,6 billion the Infrastructure of the Caspian resort

29.05.2025

Approved planning of the territory 432 ha

By the end of 2027, Kavkaz.RF JSC will invest 14.6 billion roubles in developing the internal infrastructure of the Caspian Coastal Cluster complex and the Dagestan children’s centre. Dagestan’s head, Sergey Melikov, announced this in his address to the republic’s People’s Assembly, according to Interfax.

“Of particular importance for the development of tourism and bringing it to a qualitatively different level is the implementation of the project of the all-season tourist and recreational complex “Caspian coastal cluster” and the all-Russian children’s center “Dagestan” in the Derbent district. The planning of the area of more than 432 hectares was approved, the parameters of the necessary infrastructure were determined," he said.

Melikov noted that tourism is a driver of the socio-economic growth of Dagestan. He said that last year in the republic began work on the legalization of the activities of tourist enterprises and collective accommodation facilities. As a result, tourism services for 2024 The year was in order 22 billion Roughly, the increase was 5 billion

  • Large-scale investment projects
    • MIP "Construction of fair complex "Russian fairs-Makhachkala"
    • MIP "Construction of wholesale and logistics center"
    • MIP "Production of concentrated juices, purees and nectars"
    • Establishment of a rice production and processing centre
    • MIP "Construction of a sewing shop"
    • MIP "Complex for storage and transportation of liquid medical oxygen and liquid argon of own production in RD
    • MIP "Planning vineyards for 311 hectares in Derbent district"
    • MIP "Construction of a plant for the production of corrugated pipes in the Republic of Dagestan"
    • MIP "Construction of a meat processing enterprise with a completed cycle"
    • "Construction of solar power plant Derbent SPP "SES Zodiac" in the Republic of Dagestan"
    • "Production of glass fiber and products from it"
    • "Comprehensive development of the territory of the microdistrict "South" of Derbent"
    • "Production of juice products from vegetables and fruits"
    • "Launch of a super-intensive garden in Derbent district of RD"
    • "Filling of a vineyard with drip irrigation on a land plot of 331,8 hectares in the village of Jalgan of Derbent district"
    • "Construction of asphalt concrete plant"
    • "Construction of a wholesale distribution center"
  • Breakthrough investment projects
    • Creation of tourist and recreational complex "Inche Marina Caspian"
    • Creation of tourist and recreational complex "Golden Sands"
    • Creation of tourist and recreational complex "Caspian"
    • Construction of mkr. "The Coast," Mr. Makhachkala, Primorsky residential area
    • Construction of a plant for processing vegetables and fruits, and further production of concentrates, concentrated puree, as well as direct-pressed juices and
    • Development of apple and hazelnut gardens and construction of a high-tech fruit storage facility with a capacity of up to 50 000 tons in the Republic of Dagestan
    • Reconstruction (construction) of federal property, including the construction of a new runway
    • Strategic project "City of shoemakers"
    • Construction of a glass furnace for the production of single-stage textile fiberglass, g. Caspian
    • Modernization and expansion of the workshop for the production of glass containers that meet European standards, g. Daghestan Lights
    • Organization and expansion of ceramic granite tile production in the Republic of Dagestan

Project materials · Full published text

Dagestan State Program

Source status: archive

The state program of Dagestan is the reference context of territorial projects.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/gos-programma-dagestana.html

Open on the site

GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN

Resolution of 24 October 2023 No 420 MACHACHALA

About modification of the state program

Republic of Dagestan "Socio-economic

development of mountainous territories of the Republic of Dagestan"

The Government of the Republic of Dagestan decrees: 1. Approve the enclosed changes which are made to the state program of the Republic of Dagestan "Social and economic development of mountain areas"

Territories

Republic

the Government of the Republic

Daghestani, by Daghestani decree 18 February 2020 № 21 About approval of the state program of the Republic of Dagestan "Social-

Approved

Economic Development of Mountainous Territories of the Republic of Dagestan

changes to the List of state programs of the Republic of Dagestan" (www.pravo.e- (Internet portal of legal information of the Republic of Dagestan dag.ru), 2020, 26 February, №05002005322; 2021, 4 February, № 05002006714; 15 June, № 05007007285; 2022, 25 November, № 05002010065).

2.- Present-decree-out-stealth-in-force-with-1-January-2024-year.

DARAALENI - BUSINESS PRODUCTION

Acting Secretary General

the Government ’s Editor

the Republic of Dagestan

R. Aliyev

APPROVED

the Government Decree

the Republic of Dagestan

from 24 October 2023 No 420

Changes,

which are included in the state program

Republic of Dagestan "Socio-economic development

Mountainous Territories of the Republic of Dagestan

State program of the Republic of Dagestan "Social -

Economic Development of the Mountainous Territories of the Republic of Dagestan

This edition:

"APPROVED

the Government Decree

Republic of Dagestan from 18 February 2020 g, No 21 (as amended by the resolution)

the Government of the Republic of Dagestan

The State Program

from 24 October 2023 No 420)

Republic of Dagestan "Socio-economic

Development of Mountainous Territories of the Republic of Dagestan

Strategic priorities in the public sector

the Program of the Republic of Dagestan " Socio-Economic Development

Mountainous Territories of the Republic of Dagestan

1. Assessment of the current state of socio-economic development of mountainous areas of the Republic of Dagestan

The Republic of Dagestan in terms of territory (50,3 thousand sq. km) and population (3,21 million people) is one of the largest subjects of the Russian Federation in the North Caucasus.

Mountainous territories occupy 44,0 percent of the area of Dagestan (22335 sq. km). Their natural and climatic features, which differ from the plains,

Cultivate

specific

parameters

Functioning

Natural

ecosystems, create special living conditions for people that affect their health,

Lifestyle and daily activities. Mountainous territories of Dagestan

are located in the eastern part of the Caucasus ridge and bordered in the south by the Republic of Azerbaijan, in the southwest by Georgia, and in the west by the Chechen Republic.

Mountainous territories of the Republic of Dagestan include 1153 settlements (69,9 percent of the total number of settlements of the republic).

the Law of the Republic of Dagestan 5 May 2006 № 25 "About the river of hard-to-reach and remote areas in the Republic of Dagestan" 492 settlements are classified as hard-to-reach areas. These settlements are located mainly in the zone of special conditions.

Of the total number of settlements located within the boundaries of mountain territories, large, with a population of more than 5 thousand people, -20, with a population of up to 100 people - 267.

As of 1 January 2023, the population of the mountainous areas was 951.7 thousand people (29.7 percent of the republic’s total population). Population density was 42.6 people per square kilometre (compared with an average of 63.5 people per square kilometre across the Republic of Dagestan).

In 2022, the natural increase in the population of mountain areas was 8054 people, while in 2021 - 8628 people. The outflow of population from the mountainous territories of the republic also remained.

One of the priority tasks facing the executive authorities and local self-government bodies in the republic is to create favorable conditions for the population to live in the mountain zone, as well as to dream about the future of the country.

The rate of migration from the mountains to the lowlands.

The land fund of mountain territories is 3290,2 thousand hectares. It includes land located within the boundaries of municipalities and land located outside municipal districts.

Mountain areas have a significant potential of land resources for the development of agriculture. The area of land resources per capita in mountainous areas is 3,5 ha/person (according to the public -1,6 ha/person).

Given the availability of land in the plains, assigned to the municipality

settlementsmountain territories,the situation with land resources

Very good. overall.

V

Agricultural land is 48,8 Percentage of forest land - 9,8 Percentage.

Territories

Square

Mountain

Lands

Share

According to the complex of natural factors, mountain areas are relatively favorable for certain types of economic activity, first of all, agriculture (summer pasture livestock), tourism and agriculture.

Creations.

Balneological and tourist-recreational resources are not fully used, although they have significant potential. In the short term, a huge play that is represented by unique tourist and recreational

Territories

Development

complex,

Mountain

will be

Role

the University of London

historical monuments, numerous tourist routes, objects of tourist and recreational purposes. This industry is capable

have a positive impact on related and related agropro

The artistic complex and folk crafts.

1.1. Agro-industrial complex

Agricultural products in mountainous areas are produced by 710 agricultural organizations, 1,5 thousand peasant (farm) farms, as well as more than 277 thousand personal subsidiary farms. The industry employs more than 315 thousand people, which is 38,5 percent of the total population of mountainous territories. Most of the agricultural products in the mountainous areas are produced in private farms, where there is a high proportion of

manual labor, low productivity.

In the economy of mountain areas, diversified agriculture has developed. The production of cereals, potatoes, legumes, meat, milk,

eggs, honey, fruits and berries.

V 2022 The volume of agricultural production in the mountainous areas amounted to 83697,9 million rubles (44,9 percentage of the republican indicator), including the volume of production of crop production - 37 245,2 million rubles (31,4 percent), livestock - 46 452,7 million rubles (40,8 Percentage).

Mountain areas have a relatively high level of security

agricultural lands.

The total area of agricultural land in mountain areas in 2022 amounted to 2275,4 thousand hectares (70,3 percent of all agricultural land of the republic).

In the structure of agricultural land a significant proportion of pastures - 1767,6 Thousands of hectares (77,7 percent), arable land - 177,0 Thousands of hectares (7,8 percent), hay - 159,2 Thousands of hectares (6,9 Percentage).

Area of unused agricultural land in 2022

villa 99,3 thousand hectares (4,3%).

V 2022 The area of agricultural land in the mountainous areas per person was 2,7 A hectare, which is more than 2,4 times higher than the average of the Republic (1,1 g/person). The area of arable land per inhabitant was 0,2 g/person (in the Republic - 0,16 ha/person.).

In the livestock industry in 2022 The number of cattle in the mountain areas 622,6 Thousands of cows, including 296,2 Thousands of heads. The small cattle population was 3418,3 Thousands of heads.

V 2022 the Year of Production 116,3 thousand tons of meat in live weight (43,7 percentage of meat production in the republic), milk - 577,8 thousand tons (61,4 About the cent, wool - 8,7 thousand tons (60,0 Percentage).

Crop production is an important branch of agriculture in mountainous areas. It is produced here 32,5 percentage of the gross grain harvest in the republic, 76,0 Percentage of potatoes, 58,9 percent of vegetables. In addition, fodder crops are grown (corn, annual and perennial grasses, forage melons and root crops).

Crop production forms 44,5 percent of agricultural production in mountainous areas (data from 2022 years) and 55,5 percent of crop production in the republic.

Grain production in 2022 year compared to 2021 year increased by

1,32 percent, wheat production increased by 1,71 percent.

Potato production is unstable. V 2022 The production of potatoes has decreased 4,0 Percentage (252,5 thousands of tons) relative 2021 The year the harvest was 168,3 c/ha (by Republic of Dagestan - 179,9 c/ha).

The production of oxen 2022 the Year (654,8 thousand tons) decreased relative to 2021 years (673,8 thousands of tons 3,0 Percentage. The yield of vegetables in the mountainous territories of the republic 2022 the Year of the Year 250,9 C/A, while in general 336,3 c/ha.

Production of fruits and berries in 2022 The year has grown relatively 2021 the Year 1,09 percentage and was 119,6 thousand tons. The yield was 67,2 c/ha (in the Republic of Dagestan - 82,2 c/ha).

processing;agricultural industry in

The mountain areas have developed agricultural products with great difficulties in its implementation.

creates

weakly,

For

What

Manufacturers

The volume of production of pipe products and beverages in mountain areas in 2022 amounted to 4219,6 million rubles. Its share in total industrial production amounted to 27,9 percent.

For mountain areas, it is important to create mini-shops for processing livestock products (including primary ones), which will contribute to the development of the economy.

Cooperation in agricultural production.

1.2. Industrial complex

At present, industrial production in mountain areas is represented by enterprises of food and processing industries, enterprises for the production of asphalt, crushed stone and crumbs, cinder blocks,

quarries for the production of sawn stone, brick shops, enterprises

the pits of folk crafts, enterprises for the production of plastic windows and

doors, etc.

In the year 2022, the volume of shipped goods of own production, works and services performed by own forces of large and medium-sized enterprises

for all types of economic activity in mountain areas, increased compared to 2021 year by 6,0 percent in comparable prices and amounted to 14 661,0 million rubles.

1.3. Construction Complex

Construction as interconnected, organizational and technological

a complex in the mountainous territory formed.A significant role in the construction industry is played by a small construction business.

In 2022, the total area of housing was 191,5 thousand square meters. m (0,23 sq. m per 1 inhabitants of mountain areas per year), which was fully built at the expense of individual developers.

Area of housing in mountainous areas 2022 the Year of the Year 18180,1 thousands of square meters, or 31,0 percent of the total area of housing stock of the republic.

Relatively high population security with a total area of residential buildings - 22,2 square meters. m per inhabitant (in the Republic of Dagestan the total area of residential buildings - 18,1) - is due to the low population of mountain areas.

1.4. Trade, transport and logistics complex

In the structure of trade and transport and logistics complex of mountain

Trade in the territories takes the leading positions.

The proportion of mountain areas in 2022 The year was about 9,6 percentage of the total retail trade of the republic, which is 74,7 billion rub lei.

The turnover of retail trade per capita in 2022 in the mountainous areas below the average republican indicator (241,4 thousand rubles.). Wholesale trade is also underdeveloped.

substantially

rub./person,

Immanuel

91,5

thousands of

What

Of all the types of transport in the mountainous areas operates only road. On public passenger routes

van 1849 motor vehicles.

The length of public roads within the boundaries of mountainous territories in 2022 the Year of 10 946,8 km, of which the republican value (IV category) - 1885,0 km, local (V category) - 9 249,9 kilometers. The length of roads with asphalt pavement - 1 948,1 ki meter. Density of public roads with hard cover in 2022 the Year of 457,4 km/1000 sq km. There are mountains on the roads 902 The bridge total length 21424 Lean Meters.

1.5. Socio-innovative complex

In the mountainous areas, the level of well-being of people is significantly lower than the average level in the republic. Average monthly nominal salary of employees in the mountainous territories of the republic 2022 the Year of the Year 30161,6 Ruble, while in the republic the average monthly salary was 35082.3 Ruble. Average monthly income per capita of mountain areas in 2022 the Year of 10530,4 Ruble (in the Republic - 33329,0 Ruble). V 2022 The average monthly income per capita was 83,1 about a cent of the subsistence minimum.

Expenditures of the population on mountain areas for 2022 amounted to 90421.4 million rubles. In the structure of expenditures of the population, the largest part is occupied by the purchase of food and non-food products, the obligation to

payments and other contributions, payment for services.

Number of employees in the economy in 2022 the Year of the Year 312,4 thousands of people, or 59,4 percent of the total workforce of the mountain territories. Number of economically active population in 2022 The Year - 430,6 Thousands of people or 52,7 percentage of the total population and 82,1 percent of the number of labor resources of mountain territories.

In the mountain areas

The high unemployment rate of mountain areas registered with the bodies of the State Employment Service in 2022 was 8,4 thousand people (16,2 thousand people in the republic).

concerning the population

Remains unemployed

Number

The largest share of employed in the economy of mountain areas in 2022 was in agriculture, education, provision of other services.

public, social and personal services, trade, health.

1.6. Tourist and recreation complex

Tourist and Recreation Complex of Mountain Territories 31 Children 's Health Camp, 5 sanatorium and resort organizations, 3 Classified Hotels, 118 guest houses, historical monuments, numerous tourist routes, tourist and recreational facilities. Number of recreationalists in 2022 the Year 22415 People and tourists - 302881 man. Recreational resources of mountain areas -

This is, first of all, a variety of mountain landscapes of the Greater Caucasus, a wide selection of healing mineral waters, favorable natural and climatic conditions, the presence of

many unique natural, historical and cultural monuments,

relatively favorable environmental conditions. All of the above presented

It has broad prospects for the development of the tourism and recreation industry in the mountainous territories and its investment attractiveness and allows to form the tourist and recreational direction of the development of mountain territories. This industry will have a positive impact on related and related

agro-industrial complex and folk crafts.

Factors limiting the development of tourism and recreation complex in the mountainous areas are the weak development of tourism services and the insufficient number of existing infrastructure for the industry.

1.7. Small and medium business

V 2022 the Mountain Territories 16751 Small Business Owner (in 2021 The Year - 20423), including 4714 Small businesses (in 2021 The Year - 5682) and 12037 Individual entrepreneurs (in 2021 The Year - 14741). The main activities of the subjects of ma logo and medium entrepreneurship are wholesale and retail trade (in 2022 The Year - 5968 Agriculture, hunting and forestry (5004 ed.), construction (780 ed.).

The small business turnover in 2022 the Mountain Territories 27970,7 Millions of rubles (in 2021 The Year - 16926,4 million rubles). About 29 percentage of turnover is accounted for by trade enterprises.

V 2022 in the mountainous territories decreased the number of subjects of ma logo entrepreneurship 2021 years. In the mountainous territories, conditions for the development of small business have not been created, the infrastructure for business development has not been formed.

2. Priorities and objectives of state policy in the sphere of mountain territories development

The key priorities of the Program are: improving the socio-economic situation of the mountainous territories of the Republic of Dagestan; improving the well-being and quality of life of the mountain population.

the Republic of Dagestan; ensuring sustainable economic growth; creating conditions for comfortable living in the mountainous territories of the republics

Faces.

The implementation of these priorities should be ensured by conducting an analysis of the flows, its state of the economy and the social sphere of mountain areas.

the Republic of Dagestan and the definition of the economic potential of the mountainous territories of the republic in the context of the main basic economic complexes

plex.

The objectives of the program are;

development of a set of measures and the definition of mechanisms of involvement;

state potential of mountain territories in economically active turnover;

Implementation of measures aimed at socio-economic time

development of mountain areas;

providing state support in the implementation of investment projects

mainly in the real sector of the economy;

stimulation of business development in the mountainous territories of the republic; increase of the tax base;

population growth and reduction of migration

outflow of population from the settlements of the mountain zone of the republic.

3. Relationship with the strategic priorities of the Republic of Dagestan, goals and indicators

the State Programs of the Russian Federation

The program in accordance with the system of sectoral priorities

the tasks determined by the Strategy of Social and Economic Development of the Republic of Dagestan for the period up to 2030.

Implementation of the Program has an impact on the achievement of strategic

development of the agro-industrial complex of mining

areas, as well as sectors of the economy, aimed at production and

processing of agricultural raw materials.

8

The program provides support for entrepreneurship

and personal farms in the following areas:

acquisition of equipment for entrepreneurs engaged in the field of

production and processing of industrial, food and beverages,

catering and trade;

construction of wholesale and logistics centers for product storage; purchase of small-sized agricultural equipment;

laying gardens of an intensive type;

development of tourism;

development of beekeeping.

The main competitive advantage of mountain areas is

availability

significant

Cattle

Sheep

and

Big

Horned

cattle.

Availability of raw materials will allow to develop food and processing

Industry

the University of London

Mountain

territories,

Restore

Recycled

Agricultural

Raw materials. Prospective is

development

such

areas of the food industry, such as fruit and vegetable cans and juices,

meat and meat products, dairy products, mineral waters and other bezal

Cholic drinks.

Potential growth point for rural mountain settlements

The development of organic agriculture, which will ensure the Republic of

Dagestan image of a supplier of environmentally friendly products.

Competitive advantages are raw materials and environmentally friendly

high quality products, early commercial fruiting, domestic

Demand for locally produced products.

At

Creation

relevant

Terms and Conditions

capacity

Development

The mining industry has grown significantly.

Aunt.

Creating conditions for the development and support of small businesses and

entrepreneurship, as well as demand in local product markets

The need to organize family farms in the mountains,

hunting farms and low-power industries: bakery, confectionery,

cheese making industry, preservation, packaging of medicinal products

herbs, bee products and other products.

The relationship of the Program with the goals and indicators of the state

No gram of the Russian Federation is provided.

4. The tasks of public administration in the implementation of the Program, ways of their effective solution

The Program’s objectives are defined in accordance with the Strategy

economic and social life up to 2030.

Development

Republic

Daghestan

the City

period

The objectives of mountain development are intersectoral,

cover the whole range of problems on reconstruction and modernization

existing enterprises, renewal of fixed assets, new builder

the location of modern production facilities with innovative equipment

In the field, creating a significant number of new jobs, involving the existing potential in economic turnover.

The Programme takes into account factors that ensure equitable sustainable development of mountain areas and settlements. This is a reasonable and efficient land use in the mountains, achieving self-sufficiency and employment of the population.

development of mountain areas through the development of entrepreneurship, the creation of favorable and safe conditions for capital investment in the mountain areas of the Dagestan public.

In addition, the complex of tasks indirectly provides a steady increase in incomes, reduce migration outflow and create new jobs in the mountainous territories of the republic.

Project materials · Card and available sources

the Federal Program for Dagestan

Source status: archive

The Federal Program for Dagestan is a reference context.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/programma-federalnaya-po-dagestanu.html

The text is in a separate PDF. This print compilation includes a summary and a file link; open the PDF to print the document itself.

Open on the site

Published files

Project materials · Full published text

Development of the City of Derbent, Dagestan

Source status: Project

Materials on Derbent’s development — territorial area.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/razvitie-g-derbenta-dagestan.html

Open on the site

GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

R A S P O R J E N E

from 2 October 2025 No 2753-r

MOSCOW

annexed

Approve the order

the Federation of 11 October 2021 № 2853-p (Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation, 2021, № 43, Art. 7292; 2022, № 52, Art. 9686; 2023, № 52, Art. 9697).

Governments

Russian

changes,

Who

Prime Minister of the Russian Federation

M. Mishustin

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

Approved by the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 2 October 2025 No 2753-r

and I,

which are submitted to the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 11 October 2021 No 2853-r

1. In paragraph 1 and the first paragraph 2 " The Word "2027 years to replace

with the words "the year 2030".

2. V

words

item 6

" Projects

the address investment program" to replace the words "registry of property, capital construction (reconstruction, including restoration elements, technical re-equipment) or the acquisition of which is carried out (planned to be carried out) at the expense of the federal budget, ";

construction,

Real Estate

Federal

objects

3. List of activities for integrated development Derbent up to 2027, approved by this order, state as follows:

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

2

Approved by the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 11 October 2021 No. 2853-r (as amended by the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 2 October 2025 No. 2753-r)

LIST OF EVENTS

Integrated Development of Mr. Derbent to 2030

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

(millions of rubles)

Extrabudgetary

I. Activities for which a funding mechanism has been identified

1. Construction of the water supply "Kaitag-Derbent" in the city. Derbent

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

2025 years

700,25

665,24

35,01

-

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

3

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

2027 - 2030 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2025 years

2305,61

2167,27

138,34

101,47

319,15

943,17

941,82

-

95,38

300

886,58

885,31

-

6,09

19,15

56,59

56,51

-

2025 years

3,19

3,1

0,09

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

The Ministry of Health of Russia, the Government of the Republic of Dagestan, the administration of the city of Derbent

The Ministry of Health of Russia, the Government of the Republic of Dagestan, the administration of the city of Derbent

2. Construction of the Shurdere-Derbent water pipeline in the city Derbent

3. Equipment and re-equipment

equipment of the state budgetary institution of the Republic of Dagestan "Derbent Central City Hospital"2

4. Equipment and re-equipment

State budgetary institution of the Republic of Dagestan "Derbent Central City Hospital" by road for the delivery of patients to medical organizations, medical workers to the place

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

4

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

residence of patients, as well as for the transport of biological materials for research, the delivery of drugs to residents of remote areas

5. Major renovation of buildings

State budgetary institution of the Republic of Dagestan "Derbent Central City Hospital"

6.

Reconstruction of the street. Kobyakova and Naneishvili in Derbent

7. Construction of the waterfront in the city. Derbent (1nd stage, 1rd stage)

The Ministry of Health of Russia, the Government of the Republic of Dagestan, the administration of the city of Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

2025 years

9,3

9,09

0,21

2025 years

200,22

-

200,22

2025 - 2026 - total

including:

810

769,5

40,5

2025 years

2026 years

405,17

404,83

384,91

384,59

20,26

20,24

-

-

-

-

-

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

5

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

8. Construction of the Sports Palace (with equipment) in the city. Derbent

9.

Reconstruction of the street. Avain-Bulag in Mr. Derbent

10. Reconstruction

St. C. Yeast - Gyrkhlar-Kapy in Derbent

11. Reconstruction

St. Pushkin in Moscow. Derbent

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, City of Derbent, Ministry of Transport of Russia, Rosavtodor

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, City of Derbent, Ministry of Transport of Russia, Rosavtodor

The Government of the Republic of Dagestan, the administration of the city district "Derbent",

1447,61

1375,23

72,38

2025 - 2026 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2025 - 2026 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

851,17

596,44

152,3

95,9

56,4

808,61

566,62

144,68

91,1

53,58

2025 years

137,96

131,06

42,56

29,82

7,62

4,8

2,82

6,9

2026 years

148,77

141,33

7,44

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

6

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

12. Reconstruction

St. Construction in Mr. Derbent

13. Reconstruction of the city

streets with replacement / reconstruction of engineering communications Tahoe-Gody - Red Dawn - G. Dalgata - Sheboldayeva Derbent

14. Construction

educational institution for 1200 places in the microdistrict "South" Derbent3

Ministry of Transport of Russia, Rosavtodor

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, City of Derbent, Ministry of Transport of Russia, Rosavtodor

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, City of Derbent, Ministry of Transport of Russia, Rosavtodor

Ministry of Education of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

2025 years

112,19

106,58

5,61

2025 - 2026 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2025 - 2027 - total

including:

1123,68

1047,25

76,43

296,37

827,31

281,56

765,69

1594,47

1578,54

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

531,49

531,49

531,49

526,18

526,18

526,18

14,81

61,62

15,93

5,31

5,31

5,31

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

7

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

15. Preschool construction

educational organization for 140 places in the microdistrict "Airport" Derbent3

Ministry of Education of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

16. Preschool construction

educational organization for 160 places on the street. C. Yeast in Mr. Derbent3

Ministry of Education of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

17. Preschool construction

educational organization for 250 places in the city. Derbent3

Ministry of Education of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

2025 - 2027 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2025 - 2027 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2025 - 2027 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

265,08

262,44

2,64

88,36

88,36

88,36

314,31

104,77

104,77

104,77

310,8

103,6

103,6

103,6

87,48

87,48

87,48

311,16

103,72

103,72

103,72

307,68

102,56

102,56

102,56

0,88

0,88

0,88

3,15

1,05

1,05

1,05

3,12

1,04

1,04

1,04

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

8

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

322,47

230,35

92,12

18. Construction of preschool

educational institution No. 1 for 140 places in the microdistrict "South" Derbent

Ministry of Education of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

19. Construction of preschool

educational institution No. 2 for 140 places in the microdistrict "South" Derbent

Ministry of Education of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

20. Improvement of the park "Sosnovy Bor" in the city. Derbent. 2 queue4

21. Major maintenance

and reconstruction of preschool educational institutions (with equipment) in the city. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

2025 - 2027 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2025 - 2027 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2025 years

90,46

142,21

89,8

320,12

90,46

142,21

87,45

71,95

2027 - 2029 - total

499,28

including:

2027 years

50

89,56

140,79

-

230,35

89,56

140,79

-

64,4

-

-

0,9

1,42

89,8

89,77

0,9

1,42

87,45

7,55

499,28

50

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

9

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

22. Construction

the Derbent North Electric Substation 2" (1 Phase) in G. Derbent2

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Total, line I

2028 years

2029 years

2025 years

2025 - 2030 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

-

-

-

150

299,28

-

Total

150

299,28

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1200

240

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

10849,56

9545,25

1304,31

3892,81

3146,39

1156,94

469,15

1242,45

941,82

3544,71

3013,33

915,32

300

886,58

885,31

348,1

133,06

241,62

169,15

355,87

56,51

-

-

II. Forward-looking activities for which a funding mechanism is required

23. Construction

Waste sorting complex in the city. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

2025 - 2027 - total

including:

2025 years

1200

240

-

-

10

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

24. Construction of Southern

Sewage treatment plants in the city. Derbent3

25. Construction of the cable car in G. Derbent

26. Construction of the waterfront in the city. Derbent (1-the stage, 2- I and 3-I queue)3

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

2026 years

2027 years

2027 - 2029 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2027 - 2029 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2026 - 2028 - total

including:

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

Total

480

480

-

-

-

-

4093,92

3857,12

236,8

883,77

1234,89

1975,26

5450,19

1034,61

2160,26

2255,32

1430,88

271,62

567,15

592,11

839,58

1160,80

1856,74

44,19

74,09

118,52

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1347,74

83,14

258,04

533,12

556,58

13,58

34,03

35,53

480

480

-

-

-

-

5450,19

1034,61

2160,26

2255,32

-

-

-

-

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

11

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

27. Construction of the waterfront in the city. Derbent (2-the stage)3

28. Construction of the waterfront in the city. Derbent (3-the stage)3

29. Construction of the embankment

in g. Derbent (4-th stage)3,5

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

2027 - 2029 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2028 - 2030 - total

including:

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2026 - 2030 - total

including:

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2250,8

2120,03

130,77

427,27

892,14

931,39

1266,61

240,44

502,04

524,13

2680

30

-

530

1060

1060

405,91

838,61

875,51

1193,02

228,42

471,92

492,68

2491

-

-

498,2

996,4

996,4

21,36

53,53

55,88

73,59

12,02

30,12

31,45

189

30

-

31,8

63,6

63,6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

12

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

30. Construction of the embankment

in g. Derbent (5-th stage)3,5

31. Construction of the embankment

in g. Derbent (6-th stage)3,5

32. Market construction

in g. Derbent

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

2027 - 2030 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2027 - 2030 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2029 - 2030 - total

including:

2029 years

2030 years

2945

2735,4

209,6

35

582

1164

1164

1948,66

25

384,74

769,46

769,46

250

200

50

-

547,08

1094,16

1094,16

1808,24

-

361,66

723,29

723,29

-

-

-

35

34,92

69,84

69,84

140,42

25

23,08

46,17

46,17

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

250

200

50

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

13

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

33. Construction of wholesale-

distribution center in the city. Derbent

34. Construction of bus station

in g. Derbent

35. Complex

improvement of the street-road network of the magic part of the city. Derbent (stages 4.2 and 5)3,5

36. Construction of an apartment hotel on the Caspian Sea coast (near the Patriot Park) in the city. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the urban district "Derbent", Ministry of Construction of Russia

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

2027 - 2028 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 - 2030 - total

including:

2029 years

2030 years

2026 - 2027 - total

including:

2026 years

2027 years

2026 - 2029 - total

including:

2026 years

2027 years

Total

2000

1000

1000

1800

800

1000

638,72

250,4

388,32

5000

1500

1500

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

602,9

35,82

237,88

365,02

12,52

23,3

-

-

-

-

-

-

2000

1000

1000

1800

800

1000

-

-

-

5000

1500

1500

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

14

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

37. Construction of covered parking spaces in the city. Derbent

38. Construction of the park

Entertainment in G. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

39. Construction of a road network and engineering communications in the microdistrict "South" Derbent3, 5

Ministry of Construction of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent City Administration

2028 years

2029 years

2028 - 2029 - total

including:

2028 years

2029 years

2026 - 2030 - total

including:

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2026 - 2028 - total

including:

1500

500

520

260

260

3000

300

600

900

1000

200

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

6569,58

6187,83

381,75

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

1241,69

1944,49

3383,4

1179,61

1827,82

3180,4

62,08

116,67

203

1500

500

520

260

260

3000

300

600

900

1000

200

-

-

-

-

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

15

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

40. Improvement of the territory

and the construction of multi-level parking in the microdistrict "South" Derbent3

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

41. Construction of hotels in the microdistrict "South" Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

42. Construction

administrative and business buildings in the microdistrict "South" Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

2027 - 2030 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2027 - 2029 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2027 - 2029 - total

including:

2789

25

350

750

1664

2450

350

900

1200

5336

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

1100,8

1600,8

2634,4

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2789

25

350

750

1664

2450

350

900

1200

5336

1100,8

1600,8

2634,4

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

16

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

43. Construction of University

in the South neighborhood. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

44. Construction of a road network and utilities in the neighborhood "Avain" Derbent5

Ministry of Construction of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent City Administration

45. Construction of preschool educational institution for 200 places in the neighborhood "Avain" Derbent3

Ministry of Education of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

2027 - 2030 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2026 - 2028 - total

including:

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2028 - 2030 - total

including:

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

Total

4062,5

418,75

750

1100

1793,75

1824,9

344,92

540,14

939,84

322,4

12,4

155

155

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1718,85

106,05

327,67

507,73

883,45

291,4

-

145,7

145,7

17,25

32,41

56,39

31

12,4

9,3

9,3

4062,5

418,75

750

1100

1793,75

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

17

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

46. Construction of average

secondary school for 500 places in the neighborhood "Avain" Derbent3

Ministry of Education of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

47. Construction of the park

in the neighborhood "Avain" g. Derbent3,5

48. Construction of a cultural center in the neighborhood "Avain" Derbent

Ministry of Construction of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent City Administration

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

2028 - 2030 - total

including:

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2026 - 2028 - total

including:

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2028 - 2030 - total

including:

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

1063,14

999,36

63,78

354,38

354,38

354,38

2468,3

828,78

865,24

774,28

1800

420

720

660

333,12

333,12

333,12

2328,49

787,34

813,33

727,82

-

-

-

-

21,26

21,26

21,26

139,81

41,44

51,91

46,46

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1800

420

720

660

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

18

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

49. Integrated development

Industrial areas in G. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

50. Construction of sewage treatment plants in the city. Derbente (adjustment)3, 5

51. Update

Railway Station Complex Derbent6

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the urban district "Derbent", Ministry of Construction of Russia

The Government of the Republic of Dagestan, the administration of the city district "Derbent", the Ministry of Transport of Russia, with the participation of the open joint-stock company "Russian Railways"

2028 - 2030 - total

including:

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2028 - 2030 - total

including:

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2027 - 2029 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

Total

2486

365

691

1430

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1131,63

1063,73

67,9

247,64

530,19

353,8

1000

200

400

400

232,78

498,38

332,57

-

-

-

-

14,86

31,81

21,23

-

-

-

-

2486

365

691

1430

-

-

-

-

1000

200

400

400

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

19

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

52. Construction of hotels

in g. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

53. Construction of shopping centers and buildings in the city. Derbent

54. Construction of catering facilities in the city. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

2025 - 2030 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2025 - 2027 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2025 - 2027 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

Total

4300

500

550

600

700

950

1000

3399,3

1100

1299,3

1000

350

100

100

150

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4300

500

550

600

700

950

1000

3399,3

1100

1299,3

1000

350

100

100

150

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

20

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

55. Modernization

existing and the creation of new industrial facilities in the country. Derbent

56. Housing construction

in g. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

57. Construction

commercial facilities in the microdistrict "South" Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

2025 years

1000

2025 - 2030 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2025 - 2030 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

1150

150

150

200

200

300

150

12035,64

1067,93

2967,71

1000

1000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1000

1150

150

150

200

200

300

150

12035,64

1067,93

2967,71

1000

1000

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

21

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

58. Construction of residential buildings

in the South neighborhood. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

59. Construction of religious buildings in the microdistrict "South" Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

2029 years

2030 years

2025 - 2030 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2025 - 2030 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

4000

2000

7863,17

2300

1000

1000

1000

2000

563,17

14400

200

1700

2200

1300

4000

5000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4000

2000

7863,17

2300

1000

1000

1000

2000

563,17

14400

200

1700

2200

1300

4000

5000

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

22

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

60. Construction of the center of gifted children in the microdistrict "South" Derbent

61. Construction

commercial facilities in the neighborhood "Avain" Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

62. Construction of residential buildings in the neighborhood "Avain" Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

2027 - 2028 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2026 - 2030 - total

including:

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2025 - 2030 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

450

200

250

1050

260

260

230

200

100

7350

920

1230

1000

1000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

450

200

250

1050

260

260

230

200

100

7350

920

1230

1000

1000

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

23

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

63. Construction of tourist-

Recreational complex "South Pier" in the city. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

64. Reconstruction of the street-

The road network in G. Derbent

65. Construction

the Derbent North Electric Substation 2" (2 Phase) in G. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

The Government of the Republic of Dagestan, the administration of the urban district "Derbent", the Ministry of Energy of Russia, with the participation of the public joint-stock company "Federal Grid Company - Rosseti"

Total

1200

2000

329,78

60

119,89

149,89

45

2029 years

2030 years

2026 - 2028 - total

including:

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2025 years

2026 - 2028 - total

including:

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

3537,4

1061,22

1414,96

1061,22

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

45

-

-

-

-

1200

2000

329,78

60

119,89

149,89

-

3537,4

1061,22

1414,96

1061,22

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

24

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

66. Complex

improvement of streets, parks and public spaces in the city Derbent

67. Major repairs of streets and engineering networks Derbent

68. Urban Renovation

Water supply and sanitation systems in the city. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

69. Creating additional places in the field of preschool education in the city. Derbent

Government of the Republic of Dagestan, administration of the city district "Derbent"

2025 years

71,21

2025 years

69,9

2025 - 2028 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2025 - 2028 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

829,46

98,56

488,59

100

142,31

375,2

80,42

-

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

71,21

69,9

829,46

98,56

488,59

100

142,31

375,2

80,42

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

25

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

70. Construction of a central city hospital in the city. Derbent5

The Ministry of Health of Russia, the Government of the Republic of Dagestan, the administration of the city of Derbent

71. Construction of overpass

on the street. Sheboldayeva with access to M-29 "Caucasus" in the city. Derbent3

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, Government of the Republic of Dagestan, Derbent city district administration

Total, line II

2027 years

2028 years

2025 - 2029 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2027 - 2029 - total

including:

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2025 - 2030 - total

including:

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

Total

-

294,78

84,19

84,19

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

294,78

84,19

84,19

-

-

-

-

6376,16

5998,76

377,4

517,75

645,93

5212,48

134844,64

491,86

607,17

4899,73

34743,87

25,89

38,76

312,75

3741,79

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

96358,98

2025 years

8027,21

-

449,28

7577,93

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

26

Event

Responsible Executive

Term of implementation

Total

Amount and sources of funding1

Federal Budget Funds

the Consolidated Budget of the Republic of Dagestan

Extrabudgetary

Total

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

2025 - 2030 - total

including:

2025 years

2026 years

2027 years

2028 years

2029 years

2030 years

16114,23

22148,14

28748,45

37814,92

21991,69

145694,2

11920,02

19260,62

23305,08

29217,6

39057,37

22933,51

2790,54

5784,37

10156,09

11894,95

4117,92

44289,12

3544,71

5803,87

6699,69

10456,09

12781,53

5003,23

665,46

509,76

1095,19

759,25

262,85

5046,1

797,38

798,52

751,38

1264,34

1115,12

319,36

12658,23

15854,01

17497,17

25160,72

17610,92

96358,98

7577,93

12658,23

15854,01

17497,17

25160,72

17610,92

____________________ 1 The volume of financing of activities at the expense of the federal budget and the budget of the Republic of Dagestan shall be subject to annual clarification in accordance with the established procedure when drafting the relevant budgets for the next financial year and planning period, the amount of appropriations from extrabudgetary sources shall be subject to annual clarification and coordination with the owners of facilities in accordance with their investment programs. 2 The facility is fully funded and will be put into operation 2025 Year of funding in 2025 Year not provided. 3 The name, volumes and terms of financing may change according to the results of development of design estimates and consideration of supporting documents submitted by the Government of the Republic of Dagestan, including a positive conclusion of the state examination, as well as the results of selection of capital facilities

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

27

construction during the formation for the relevant period of the register of capital construction objects, real estate, construction (reconstruction, including restoration elements, technical re-equipment) or the acquisition of which is carried out (planned to be carried out) at the expense of the federal budget. 4 Financing of the event is carried out at the expense of funds received in accordance with the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation from 7 March 2018 № 237 About provision and distribution of means of the state support from the federal budget to budgets of subjects of the Russian Federation for encouragement of municipalities - winners of the All-Russian competition of the best projects of creation of comfortable urban environment. 5 Sources of financial support for the implementation of measures will be determined during the execution of the federal budget and within the budget allocations in the federal budget for the relevant financial year. 6 The feasibility and timing of the implementation of activities, sources and amounts of funding, as well as the possibility of participation of the open joint stock company "Russian Railways" will be determined on the basis of the development by the Government of the Republic of Dagestan of a feasibility study. ".

___________

1581500-Uch-2025 (12.0)

Project materials · Full published text

Development of Energy, Housing and Utility Enterprises in the Republic of Dagestan

Source status: Project

Materials on the development of energy, housing and utilities in Dagestan.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/razvitie-predpriyatii-energetiki-i-zhkh-respubliki-dagestan.html

Open on the site

AlexanderNovakprovoksvesvetsemestvoproizvitaEnergetika ZhKhRepublicsDagestan

30 April 2025 21:30 HouseGovernments, Moscow

Alexander Novak held a meeting on the development of energy enterprises and housing and communal services of the Republic of Dagestan

30 April 2025

Alexander Novak held a meeting on the development of energy enterprises and housing and communal services of the Republic of Dagestan

30 April 2025

Alexander Novak held a meeting with the head of the Republic of Dagestan Sergey Melikov

30 April 2025

NextNews

AlexanderNovakprovoksvesvetsemestvoproizvitaEnergetika ZhKhRepublicsDagestan

Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak held a meeting on the implementation of the regional program for sustainable economic development of energy enterprises and housing and communal services of the Republic of Dagestan.

The event was attended by the head of the Republic of Dagestan Sergey Melikov, representatives of the Ministry of Energy and the Ministry of Economic Development, heads of energy companies, representatives of the government of Dagestan.

The participants discussed the implementation of the order of the President of Russia for the development of energy in Dagestan, the current status and prospects for the implementation of the regional program for the sustainable economic development of energy enterprises and housing and communal services, as well as the implementation of the roadmap for stabilizing the situation in the power grid complex and reliable energy supply to consumers in the Republic of Dagestan.

Sergey Melikov noted that the growth of energy consumption in the region requires further modernization of the electric grid economy and the creation of the necessary conditions for connecting new infrastructure facilities to the grid.

According to the Ministry of Energy, the federal headquarters for stabilizing the situation in the power grid complex and reliable power supply of Dagestan continues to work to reduce electricity losses, consolidate power grid facilities, increase the payment discipline of electricity consumers and utilities, eliminate hotbeds of non-contractual electricity consumption, including the identification and suppression of illegal mining of cryptocurrencies.

Alexander Novak instructed the Ministry of Energy, together with federal and regional executive authorities, to develop a comprehensive program for the development of the energy system of the Republic of Dagestan for the period up to 2031, which will provide for measures to modernize and expand the region's energy capacities in accordance with the increase in electricity demand against the background of economic growth, population growth and the development of modern tourist infrastructure. It was also instructed to monitor the implementation of the program to improve the energy efficiency of the power grid economy of the region.

The authorities of Dagestan, together with energy companies, were instructed to continue work on improving the payment discipline of consumers of electricity and housing and communal services in Dagestan, to improve the consumer accounting system and the debt collection system, including in court. It was also instructed to continue the work on consolidation of the electric grid economy and its involvement in economic turnover. Federal authorities have been instructed to work out options for toughening liability for illegal connection to power grids and use of electricity in energy-deficit regions, including Dagestan.

The Deputy Prime Minister also stressed the need for advance preparation of the energy system of the Republic of Dagestan for the autumn-winter period of 2025–2026.

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Historical Library Materials

Five archive entries: organisational, contractual and project materials from earlier periods. They are included for traceability and are not identified as newly applicable decisions.

Materials: 5 · with full text: 4 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Archive / historical materials · Full published text

Archival document (PDF)

Source status: archive

Historical document from the archive of the cooperative.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/afbgy3mqxlndxhvvvvhrxcra2h6upuan.html

Open on the site

NATIONAL PROJECT "Tourism and Hospitality"

Deputy Chairman of the Government: D. N. Chernyshenko Responsible FOV: Ministry of Economic Development of Russia Project Manager: M. Mr. Reshetnikov

PURPOSE OF THE NATIONAL PROJECT:

SENDED TO ASSIST THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL:

• Increasing the role of the tourism industry in the country's economy and increasing the number of tourist trips to 140 million by 2030

A sustainable and dynamic economy

FEDERAL PROJECTS:

• Creation of a room fund • Sea resorts

• Tourist

attractiveness of the country

• Personnel • Industrial support for tourism

NATIONAL PROJECT "Tourism and Hospitality"

Key activities of the national project

• Preferential lending for the construction of large hotels from 120 rooms and tourist attractions (ski resorts, water parks, year-round amusement parks) - 59 thousand new rooms and an increase in the number of visits to the created infrastructure for recreation and entertainment to 23 million people per year.

• Creation of year-round seaside resorts - 11 projects in 9 subjects of the Russian Federation - more than 72 thousand new rooms and 80 thousand jobs.

• Construction of modular non-capital funds

accommodation - 10 thousand new rooms.

• Unified subsidy to subjects of the Russian Federation

Events, improvement of historical city centers, development of beaches and tourist routes, creation of non-capital berthing infrastructure will provide an increase in tourist trips by 7,4 million.

• Development and operation

information systems aimed at implementing public services and functions in the tourism sector, creating a single digital platform, including 18 digital services, including identification of at least 35 000 Participants in the tourism services market. • Organization of a feedback system with all participants of the tourism industry. The index of satisfaction of citizens in tourism and hospitality will reach 80 %.

• Training 89 regional program teams

formation of a regional product for domestic tourism under the programs of additional professional education.

• Training 96 regional teams for the formation and

promotion of international tourism product to foreign markets.

• Productivity improvement projects in 57

organizations in the field of tourism in the direction of "Lean production".

• Development of educational and methodological complexes and conducting

training of personnel for the tourism and hospitality industry up to 53 thousand students.

• A mechanism has been created to stimulate demand for domestic products for the tourism industry to sell 11,8 thousand domestic products for the tourism industry, including equipment for ski resorts, cable cars, as well as equipment for amusement parks and domestic tourist buses.

NATIONAL PROJECT "Tourism and Hospitality"

Key indicators of the national project by 2030

• The share of the tourism industry in the gross domestic product is 5 %.

• Number of tourist trips in the territory of the Russian Federation

- 140 million

• Exports of tourism services – $10,75 billion

Archive / historical materials · Full published text

Archival document (PDF)

Source status: archive

Historical document from the archive of the cooperative.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/uvjnwosw8nugsa2zabdwbsmne7vok3gb.html

Open on the site

List of participants of the meeting of the Government of the Russian Federation

3 October 2025 Government House of the Russian Federation

Tatyana Golikova

- Deputy Prime Minister

the Russian Federation

NOVAK Alexander Valentinovich

- Deputy Prime Minister

the Russian Federation

OVERCHUK Alexey Logvinovich

- Deputy Prime Minister

the Russian Federation

PATRUSHEV Dmitry Nikolaevich

- Deputy Prime Minister

the Russian Federation

SAVELEV Vitaly Gennadievich

- Deputy Prime Minister

the Russian Federation

HUSNULLIN Marat Shakirzianovich

- Deputy Prime Minister

the Russian Federation

CHERNYSHENKO Dmitry Nikolaevich

- Deputy Prime Minister

the Russian Federation

CHUICHENKO Konstantin Anatolievich

- Minister of Justice

the Russian Federation

Anton ALIKHANOV

DEGTYAREV Mikhail Vladimirovich

- Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation

Federation

- Minister of Sports of the Russian Federation

KOZLOV Alexander Alexandrovich

- Minister of Natural

Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation

Kravtsov Sergey Sergeevich

NIKITIN Andrey Sergeevich

- Minister of Education of the Russian Federation

- Minister of Transport of the Russian Federation

Anton Germanovich Siluanov

FIZULLIN Irek Envarovich

2

- Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation

- Minister of Construction and Housing

Communal Services of the Russian Federation

FALKOV Valery Nikolaevich

- Minister of Science and Higher Education

the Russian Federation

CIVILEV Sergey Evgenievich

CHEKUNKOV Alexey

- Minister of Energy of the Russian Federation

- Minister of the Russian Federation for Development

the Far East and Arctic

Shadayev Maksut Igorevich

- Minister of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media

Communications of the Russian Federation

KRASNIKOV Gennady Yakovlevich

TREMBITSKY Alexander Vyacheslavovich

- President of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Head of the Federal Service

Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision

OBRVALIN Sergey Gennadievich

First Deputy Minister of Culture

the Russian Federation

FASTOVA Elena

First Deputy Minister of Agriculture

the Russian Federation

FISENKO Victor Sergeevich

- First Deputy Minister of Health

the Russian Federation

HOREMYKIN Viktor Petrovich

- Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation - Head of the Main Military and Political Directorate of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation

ZUBOV Igor Nikolaevich

- State Secretary - Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

Anatoly Suprunovsky

3

Deputy Minister of the Russian Federation

Civil Defense, Emergencies and Disaster Relief - Chief State Inspector of the Russian Federation for Fire Supervision

PUDOV Andrey Nikolaevich

- State Secretary - Deputy Minister of Labour and

Social Protection of the Russian Federation

KhERSONTSEV Alexey Igorevich

- State Secretary - Deputy Minister

Economic Development of the Russian Federation

GAVRILOV Sergey Anatolievich

Valery Sergeevich Seleznov

the State Duma of the Federal

Assembly of the Russian Federation, representative of the faction of the political party "COMMUNICAL PARTY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION"

the State Duma of the Federal

Assembly of the Russian Federation, representative of the faction of the political party LDPR - the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia

PONOMAREV Yuri Alexandrovich

- Deputy Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation

Federation

GUZNOV Alexey Gennadievich

- State Secretary - Deputy Chairman of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation

OSTROVSKY Alexey Vladimirovich

- Director General of the Ministry

of the Russian Federation

Lyakina Olga Yurievna

- Deputy Presidential Affairs Manager

the Russian Federation

Archive / historical materials · Full published text

In accordance with

Source status: archive

Historical working document from the archive of the cooperative.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/v-sootvetstvii.html

Open on the site

From_____October 2025

Special Economic Zones for Tourists

recreational type and medical and health tourism in the North Caucasus Federal District.

V

"About

Law

Conform

the Federal Reserve

Special Economic Zones in the Russian Federation”, taking into account the absence for more than three years of agreements on the conduct of tourist and special recreational economic zones, medical and health tourism in the territory of the implementation of the Decree of the North Caucasian President of the Russian Federation No. 204 in terms of national projects "Health Care Government of the Russian Federation in the following areas:

Activities at

"Demography"

Federal

Territories

District,

Parts

and

1. Approve the enclosed changes which are made to acts of the Government of the Russian Federation concerning creation of special economic zones.

2. The Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation shall conclude contracts on behalf of the Government of the Russian Federation, with the governments of the Karachay-Cherkess Republic, the Chechen Republic, the Republic of Ingushetia, the Government of the Kabardino-self-government of the Balkar Republic,

Local Authorities

and

District

The Republic,

Elbrussky municipal district, Chereksky municipal district, Chegemsky municipal district of the Zolya region of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, the municipal Zelenchuk and Urupsky municipal districts of the Karachay-Cherkess Itum-Kalinsky territories of the Chechen Republic, Dzheyrah and Sunzhensky municipal districts of the Republic of Karabudakhkent, Ingushet.

the Hunzah territories,

Territory

the City

District,

A strategic investor, a number

3. The Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation to include in the program offered within the concession tourist-agreement of the recreational special economic zones of the North Caucasus federal tourist-recreational complexes "Arkhyz" (on the territories of Zelenchuk and Urup municipal Republic), "Veduchi" (on the territory of Itum-Kala municipal district of the Chechen Republic), "Elbrus" (on the territories of Elbrus).

Karachay - Cherkess

Municipal

Districts

(on

Prime Minister

the Russian Federation

M. Mishustin

Archive / historical materials · Card and available sources

State program (archive)

Source status: archive

Historical materials of state programs.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/library/gos-prog.html

The text is in a separate PDF. This print compilation includes a summary and a file link; open the PDF to print the document itself.

Open on the site

Published files

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Strategy and management

Texts about state and social structures, development strategies, management and institutional proposals. Brief summaries are accompanied by the published text and links to the originals.

Materials: 19 · with full text: 19 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Strategy · Full published text

White Paper of Shared Destiny

Source Status: Primary Document

People. A Living Earth. A Creative Civilisation.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/belaya-kniga-edinoy-sudby

Open on the site

CIVILIZATION METAPROJECT • EQUILIBRIUM

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

People. A Living Earth. A Creative Civilisation.

From common sense to concerted action
and verifiable improvement of life.

16 KON Principles19 ARTICLES19 BALANCES
Moral and philosophical groundsthe Covenant of One HeavenHarmonization of needs and opportunities

Three Spheres × 19 Directions × 13 Fields = 741
Measuring circuit matrix: 13 × 20 = 260

Initiator of the concept: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

Master document of the “Book of Kins” project
Working Edition 1.0 • 9 September 2026

PASSPORT EDITION

The purpose and status of the book

FieldContents
NameWhite Paper of Shared Destiny
IDBK-ES-001
Edition1.0 from 09.09.2026. Project for discussion and development of pilots.
ContinuityDevelopment of the White Paper of Destiny master concept. The titles of earlier works are retained in the register.
SubjectMeaningful bases, 19 directions, related balances, institutions, data and execution mechanisms.
HorizonFirst cycle: 365 days from the agreed launch. Long-term horizon: 2030–2050, without prejudging the results.
To whom is addressedProject participants, researchers, engineers, cooperatives, public institutions and potential partners.

Meaning in one paragraph

The book proposes to combine the image of the future with managed practice: from human dignity and careful attitude to the biosphere - to observations, decisions, resources, actions and proven results. Its basic unit is not a slogan or a separate digital service, but a replicable cycle of improving life, for which there is someone to answer.

Four Reading Modes

The basis is author's values and covenant. Architecture - Proposed roles, connections, and classifiers. Proof - sources, measurements and verification. Action - Pilots, formulas and decision-making stages. These regimes complement each other, but do not substitute.

Boundaries of authority and facts

The book is not a law, an international treaty, a medical protocol or confirmation of property rights. Mentioning an organisation indicates a proposed role or the title of an earlier resource, rather than that organisation’s consent to participate. All new formulations of the 16 KON Principles, classifiers and profiles in this edition are proposed for agreement.

The register of previous works reflects the available names and thematic links. The full source files of these works are not included in the current build; their versions, signatures, and actual shipment were not verified. External sources are listed in Annex D.

NAVIGATION

Contents

01 Mission and image of the common future 4

02 Person in center of system 5

03 16 KON Principles — Foundations for Joint Action 6

04 The Covenant of One Heaven — 19 articles 8

05 Planetary Lotus and KRISTALL741 12

06 Seven levels: from principle to balance 13

07 19 the New World Order 14

08 19 Related Balance Sheets: Management Method 16

09 Measuring circuit 13 × 20 18

10 EQUILIBRIUM and execution architecture 19

11 Communities, institutions and peaceful cooperation 20

12 Finance, funds and resources 21

13 State Constructor and productive forces 22

14 Science, GRID and Future Research 23

15 Validation Map and Heritage Preservation Archive 24

16 Five pilots of the first cycle 25

17 Road map for 365 days 27

18 Risks, restrictions and stopping conditions 28

19 Acceptance, update and total commitment 29

A Passports 19 Balances 30

B Register 260 measuring positions 35

B Reference forms 36

G Register of previous works and packages 39

D Sources and reliability map 47

Titles in the content are internal references. Page numbering is updated by Word when you open the document.

CHAPTER 01

Mission and vision of a common future

Shared Destiny is a proposed name for the shared responsibility of individuals, communities, and institutions for the consequences of development. It does not deny the freedom of will, the plurality of cultures and the right to one’s own path. The general is not the way of thinking of each person, but the ability to take into account each other and the conditions for the continuation of life.

A vision of the future

At the center of this image is a person who has access to the necessary help, water, food, knowledge, safe housing and decent work. Nearby is a strong family in a variety of life circumstances, communities of mutual support, living territories, responsible enterprises and science that can explain and test its decisions.

In this book, the New World Order means a project for coordinating human, natural and productive development. It is not a claim that a universal system has already been created or that all contradictions have been eliminated. A way forward is proposed: choose tasks, agree on criteria, test solutions, identify losses and correct mistakes.

What changes in management

The initial question changes from "what object to build?" to "what need to satisfy and how to prove the result?". Object, budget, digital service and organizational structure become means. The project is considered to have taken place not after the release of the presentation or the development of funds, but after confirming the useful result and the ability to maintain it in time.

What the book brings together

EQUILIBRIUM receives the role of observation and feedback; SFERA - interaction of participants; ECO-PPA - coordination of resource obligations; SPECZASHCHITA - project execution within the confirmed powers. The State Designer links these functions with objects, technologies, territories and life cycle.

Start with a limited area and a few tasks to check. The planetary scale remains a compatibility horizon, but not an excuse for the unlimited volume of the first launch. The right to scale arises through experience, trust and reproducibility of the result.

CHAPTER 02

The man at the center of the system

Human-centricity in the proposed model is not the position of the human icon in the middle of the scheme. This is the rule of choice of goals, methods of measurement and limitations: the solution should increase the real capabilities of people and not turn them into serving material of the system.

Life Route Instead of Departmental Gaps

The need for a person rarely coincides with the border of one institution. Returning to an independent life after an injury may require the help of specialists, an accessible environment, technical means, training, transport and family support. The book proposes to link such actions by a common route, and not to require a person to independently connect uncoordinated services.

In the Second Breath program, the benchmark for the result is an agreed improvement in daily independence. Attending classes, installing the device, and the number of consultations are counted as actions; they are not automatically declared as a restored function. Medical decisions and criteria for assistance are determined by authorized specialists.

Three Questions for Every Program

QuestionWhat you need to show
Who's feeling better?A defined group and inclusion criteria; the distribution of the effect, not just the average.
What has changed in life?Access, quality, autonomy, security or real time and resource savings.
How is that confirmed?Initial state, measurement method, period, restrictions, and participant's right to challenge the record.

Rights are not dependent on registration in the system

Access to fundamental rights should not be made conditional on acceptance of the symbolism, ideology or digital identity of the project. For essential services, the project provides a clear non-discriminatory participation procedure, an opportunity to get an explanation and an accessible channel of treatment without a complex digital procedure.

External moral and legal benchmark for comparison is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which enshrines equal dignity and rights, freedom of conscience and the opportunity to participate in public life. The specific project procedures below are an author's proposal, not an interpretation of all international law. [I03]

CHAPTER 03

16 KON Principles — Foundations for Joint Action

The word "Kon" is used as the author's designation of a moral and philosophical foundation. Below 16 The wording is an editorial version for this book, not a historical reconstruction and not established physical laws of the universe. They do not mix with balances and indicators.

K01. Integrity

The decision is evaluated together with its consequences for man, nature and society. Local winning is not declared a general success until the external losses and conditions for reproduction of the result are disclosed.

K02. Life

The preservation of life and the conditions for its continuation is accepted as the initial moral guide. When the threat of irreversible harm is threatened, priority is given to prevention, assistance and verification of the solution.

K03. Dignity

A person does not become the property of the system, the pledge of the program or a unit of consumable material. His rights, voice, and ability to refuse are retained regardless of the usefulness to the project.

K04. Freedom and responsibility

Participation is based on an understandable choice. Freedom of action is combined with the obligation to disclose risks, to be responsible for consequences and to correct the harm caused in the prescribed manner.

K05. Reciprocity

Cooperation must be clear and fair to all parties. Contributions, benefits, risks and responsibilities are discussed before action begins; the participant's weak position is not used to impose conditions.

K06. Measure

The scale of the solution relates to the need, resources and limits of the environment. Quantity growth is no substitute for quality, and a high goal does not live up to promises for which there is no proven assurance.

K07. Balance

Balance is understood as matching needs, capabilities, and recovery, not immobility. The acceptable deficit has a deadline, a responsible and coverage plan, and sustainability is tested over time.

K08. Diversity

Unity is achieved by the compatibility of actions, not by the sameness of people. Cultural, scientific and organizational differences persist when they do not violate the dignity and security of others.

Chapter 03 • CONTINUATION

16 KON Principles — Measure, Memory and the Future

K09. Truth and verifiability

Observation, opinion, hypothesis, promise, and confirmed result are denoted differently. The error is corrected openly; a reference to authority or a beautiful image does not replace the proof.

K10. Cause and effect

Any explanation of the result should reveal the mechanism and alternative causes. The coincidence of events is not considered a proven influence, and the calculation is separated from the measurement.

K11. Time and rhythm

Each process has a duration, delays, and recovery conditions. Solutions take into account service, seasonality and future liabilities; the short-term effect does not hide the long-term burden.

K12. Continuity

The new develops without destroying the memory of the previous one. Sources, authors and versions are preserved, and revision of views is documented as the development of knowledge, not as the erasure of history.

K13. Creation

Preference is given to actions that increase the real capabilities of people and living systems. Creativity is confirmed by the usefulness, accessibility and reproducibility, not just the scale of the stated design.

K14. Cooperation

Difficult tasks are solved by division of labor, exchange of knowledge and coordination of interests. Competition is not excluded, but should not destroy the foundations of trust and the general conditions of life.

K15. Recovery

Disruption of the balance requires not only explanation, but also correction. For each significant impact, maintenance, recovery actions and the source of their resource support are provided.

K16. An open future

The book does not declare the story complete and does not deprive future generations of choice. Each edition allows for criticism, verification and change while maintaining responsibility for commitments already made.

The use of horses requires a discussion of specific circumstances. When principles clash, the interests affected, the options involved and the reasons for the choice are fixed; a reference to a general principle does not replace a responsible decision.

CHAPTER 04

The Covenant of One Heaven — 19 articles

An independent, original foundational text of the White Paper of Shared Destiny. It is not a translation, abridgement or reproduction of the One-Heaven body of law. The image of One Heaven expresses the shared nature of life and is open to a secular reading.

Preamble. We take responsibility for what we create together and choose to combine freedom with care, knowledge with verification, opportunity with measure, and development with the preservation of life.

Article 1. The Fate of Free People

We recognize the commonality of living conditions and the mutual dependence of the consequences of our actions. Unity does not mean giving up the identity, culture, faith or autonomy of the community. We unite our efforts for peace, dignity and the continuation of life, without declaring any person a means of achieving someone else’s plan.

Practical expression: Each program reveals who benefits, who is affected and how objections are taken into account.

Article 2. Inviolability

Human dignity is not determined by wealth, origin, age, health status, beliefs, or participation in a project. No one should be traded, digitally pledged or a source of obligation without a valid basis. The system serves man and preserves his right to explanation and protection.

Practical expression: The project passport fixes the restrictions on the use of personal data and the independent way of considering the complaint.

Article 3. The World as a Way of Joint Action

We choose to prevent violence, negotiate, help the victims, and rebuild broken ties. Peace is not a statement: it requires safe access to basic goods, dispute resolution and the rejection of collective guilt. Any cooperation is built without coercion to participate in political or spiritual unity.

Practical expression: Peacekeeping proposals have a civilian character, a transparent mandate and agreed security rules.

Article 4. Freedom of conscience and voluntary participation

The participant has the right to share the goals of the book, not accepting its figurative or spiritual language. Accession to the program is based on clear conditions and allows for the settlement of actual obligations. Neither symbol, nor registration, nor silence of a person is a substitute for the expressed consent.

Practical expression: The participant receives a clear description of the conditions, terms, risks and procedure for termination of participation.

Chapter 04 • CONTINUATION

The Covenant of One Heaven • Article 5–9

Article 5. Children and future generations

We evaluate development according to the conditions that it leaves for children. Caring for a child combines security, love, access to knowledge and respect for his growing up. Future generations do not participate in today’s vote, so their interests should be represented in the assessment of long-term solutions.

Practical expression: Projects reveal the consequences for childhood and the obligations to service facilities after the completion of funding.

Article 6. Health and independence

The goal of help is not only to remove obstacles, but also to empower people to live, learn, work and participate in the community. We combine prevention, accessible environment and professional rehabilitation, while maintaining personal choice and confidentiality. The promise of results is no substitute for safety and effectiveness testing.

Practical expression: The outcome criteria are consistent with the person and the specialists; expectations and actual changes achieved are reflected separately.

Article 7. Living Earth

The biosphere is seen as a condition for the existence of civilization, and not as an unlimited warehouse. We preserve the diversity of living systems and take into account the territory’s ability to recover. Intervention must have clear boundaries, monitoring and accountability for consequences.

Practical expression: Natural projects are spatial accounting of the initial state, changes and recovery actions.

Article 8. Water and food

Access to water and nutrition is a priority for development programmes. We combine reliability of supply, safety, availability and careful attitude to sources. Improvements in human supply should not be achieved through the hidden depletion of water systems and soils.

Practical expression: The result is confirmed by data on access, quality, losses and state of sources, and not by one volume of production.

Article 9. Knowledge and education

We support the human right to learn, to ask questions, to check the grounds and to pass on skills. Knowledge retains authorship and is disclosed to society within the agreed rights and security. Education aims at understanding, independence and the ability to act, not just to obtain a document.

Practical expression: Training programs set verifiable learning outcomes and available participation routes for different groups.

Chapter 04 • CONTINUATION

The Covenant of One Heaven • Article 10–14

Article 10. Science and honest research

The courage of design is combined with the discipline of verification. The hypothesis has the right to research, but becomes the basis of mass application only after sufficient confirmation in the relevant field. We maintain methods, limitations and negative results so that subsequent decisions can become more accurate.

Practical expression: The research passport separates assumption, model, test, independent reproduction, and operational result.

Article 11. Labor and the creative economy

We strive for work that provides a decent life, preserves health and develops skills. Entrepreneurship and cooperation should empower individuals, not make dependency a condition for survival. Success is assessed by the quality of the product, the fairness of the relationship and the sustainability of the activity.

Practical expression: The project reveals working conditions, training, payment procedure and safety indicators.

Article 12. Energy and Material Responsibility

Energy, materials and infrastructure serve life and development. We support solutions whose characteristics are confirmed by tests, and the resource cycle takes into account the manufacture, operation, repair and completion of service. Neither the promised capacity nor digital recording replaces the actually available supply.

Practical expression: The passports separately indicate the measured indicators, project assumptions and service obligations.

Article 13. Finance as a means of security

Money and financial instruments should link resources to understandable actions and outcomes. We distinguish between cash, promises, rights and obligations without creating security with one name or symbol. Each participant should understand what he manages, what risks he takes and on what grounds.

Practical expression: In the financing register, the source, owner, appointment, term, restrictions and confirming document are fixed.

Article 14. Cooperation and mutual support

We combine personal initiative with the ability to act together. Cooperatives, foundations, enterprises and public associations have clear roles, internal rules and accountability to participants. The generality of the goal does not cancel the independence of the participants and does not give the right to arbitrarily dispose of their property.

Practical expression: Contribution and distribution of the result are described in advance; conflict of interest is disclosed before a decision is made.

Chapter 04 • CONTINUATION

The Covenant of One Heaven • Article 15–19

Article 15. Culture and memory

We preserve languages, heritage, artistic creativity and memory of the passed way. The general book does not erase differences and does not assign other people's sources. Knowledge transfer involves respect for creators, communities, and access conditions.

Practical Expression: Each heritage record receives an origin, author or bearer of a tradition, terms of use, and history of change.

Article 16. Law and Accountability

Power within project institutes is limited by an understandable mandate and control procedure. The decision should have a basis, a responsibility and the possibility of revision. We do not replace existing public institutions with a self-proclaimed status and do not issue an internal registry for universal jurisdiction.

Practical expression: Before the execution of a significant decision, the powers, applicable rules and order of protection of the affected persons are checked.

Article 17. Data, technology and personal freedom

A digital system helps to see connections and mistakes, but does not become the owner of human destiny. Artificial intelligence supports analysis and does not exempt people from responsibility. Access to the data is limited to the purpose; the person must know how to challenge a decision that significantly affects him or her.

Practical expression: The journal records the origin of the data, the version of the model, the human solution and the possibility of correcting the record.

Article 18. Related Balances and Fair Results

We evaluate action through its impact on several interrelated aspects of life. A positive indicator does not hide the deterioration elsewhere, and the overall reporting does not add up to incomparable values. The promised effect, measured change and proven contribution of the program are reflected separately.

Practical expression: The result is taken together with the sources, methodology, uncertainty assessment and a list of side effects.

Article 19. Continuity and an open future

The White Paper is a living commitment to learn and correct decisions, not the ultimate answer for everyone. We preserve the memory of versions, accept justified criticism, and leave space for new generations to choose from. A single destiny is created not by a single order, but by a sequence of responsible and coordinated actions.

Practical expression: Each new edition contains the reasons for the changes, the retained obligations and the available history of the discussion.

CHAPTER 05

Planetary Lotus and KRISTALL741

"Planetary lotus" and "Three Flowers of Life" are preserved as an image of the project integrity. Their task is to help see relationships; the geometry of the symbol does not prove the physical properties of the world and does not replace measurements. For practical work, the following semantic expansion of the three Spheres is proposed.

SphereWhat it checks in each of the 19 directions
S1. People and communitiesDignity, needs, accessibility, ability, work, culture and quality of life.
S2. Biosphere and TerritoryResources, spatial boundaries, the state of living systems, limits and recovery.
S3. Knowledge and CivilizationTechnologies, institutions, infrastructure, data, cooperation and the ability to maintain the result.

Each Sphere looks at the same 19 directions from its own angle. This gives 57 sense nodes, not 57 independent industries. One water project simultaneously relates to human access, water source status and supply technology. The volume of water is taken into account only once.

Three different numbers, three different assignments

DesignCalculationPurpose
Three Spheres3 × 19 = 57Meaningful representations of directions.
KRISTALL7413 × 19 × 13 = 741Structured description fields 57 nodes.
Measuring circuit13 × 20 = 260Positions of the register of indicators; separate structure.

13 Crystal Node Fields

Purpose; object; boundaries; need; opportunity; flows; responsibility; evidence; risks; solution; resource provision; result; feedback. Key entry: S-sphere-D-direction-F-field. For example, S2-D04-F08 indicates evidence for water direction in biosphere representation.

These 13 fields are the proposed passport format, not 13 indicators of chapter 09. An equal number of elements does not make structures identical. For data exchange, explicit links are established between the passport field and the required indicators.

CHAPTER 06

Seven Levels: From Principle to Balance

The proposed seven-level system links values with account and action. It is designed for this book and is not declared a restored One-Heaven technical architecture. It is not the account of the levels that matters, but the absence of gaps between them.

LevelContentsVerified exit
L1. FoundationPurpose, value and permissible limitations.The approved basis of the project and the list of unacceptable harm.
L2. ObjectWho and what affects the action; where the boundary passes.Passport of the object, territory or group of participants.
L3. EligibilityRights, consent, responsibility and authority.Agreed roles and documents sufficient for action.
L4. DecisionOptions, selection criteria, deadlines and commitments.Record the solution with the resource and stopping conditions.
L5. EventAction and observation of actual changes.Event record, measurement, or primary document.
L6. VerificationMethod, origin of data, independent evaluation.Conclusion with restrictions and confirmation status.
L7. BalanceChange of Status, Commitments and Next Decision.Updated balances and orders for the next cycle.

Transition between levels

Each transition has a mandatory question. Is the object defined enough? Is there authority? Is the security confirmed? Can the origin of the data be restored? Has the damage shifted to another balance sheet? The lack of an answer brings the work back to the previous level, rather than masking a beautiful final score.

Separate from ISO/OSI

ISO/IEC 7498-1:1994 describes the basic model of open systems interaction and is designed to harmonize system interaction standards. This is a different subject area. Seven levels of project management do not give grounds to declare compliance ISO/OSI or certification. [and02]

Example of passing

The principle of accessible water → specific water intake and consumers → operator and agreed rights → Loss Reduction Program → instrument readings → Checking the comparability → updating water, energy and financial balances. The seventh level returns the result to the original need: whether the service has become more reliable and affordable?

CHAPTER 07

19 New World Order

This is the working classifier of the edition 1.0, proposed for coordination with the passports of previous programs. It collects known project themes, but does not automatically rename source documents. The direction answers the question "what we change", the balance - "how we take into account the state and consequences".

CodeArea of workPurposeful meaningBasic Balances
D01People, health and rehabilitationHuman autonomy and available assistanceB12, B13
D02Children, the family and the continuity of generationsSafe childhood and support of free choice of familyB01, B13
D03Poverty alleviation and social supportAccess to basic goods without excluding peopleB13, B07
D04Water and water balanceReliable water for people and living systemsB03, B02
D05Climate, living soil and biocenosesPreservation and restoration of natural functionsB02, B05
D06Food and nutritionAffordable, safe and sustainable food supplyB05, B12
D07Decent work and family incomeSafe work, skills and economic independenceB09, B13
D08Entrepreneurship and cooperationViable enterprises and mutually beneficial tiesB14, B09
D09Education and Cities of KnowledgeLifelong learning and transfer of skillsB10, B11
D10Science and technological developmentVerifiable knowledge and reproducible technologiesB11, B06

Programs can cross directions

The second breath is connected D01, D07, D10 and D12. "Cooperation and Trade Unions" D07, D08 and D18. "Knowledge and Energy" D09, D10 and D11. The main thing is the result for a person or territory, not departmental affiliation.

Chapter 07 • CONTINUATION

19 Directions • technologies and institutions

CodeArea of workPurposeful meaningBasic Balances
D11Energy and Energy SustainabilityReliable energy with proven characteristicsB04, B07
D12Materials, engineering and productionProductive complexes and repairable productsB06, B11
D13Housing, construction and housingSafe environment and full life cycle of facilitiesB08, B03
D14Transport and connectivityAvailability of services, markets and research centresB15, B08
D15Data, Computational GRID and CommunicationReliable digital environment with access controlB16, B11
D16Finance, funds and resourcesTransparent funding of confirmed actionsB07, B14
D17Culture, heritage and shared memoryPreserving diversity and access to ancestral knowledgeB17, B10
D18Governance, law and public institutionsAccountability decisions and resolution of differencesB18, B16
D19Peace, security and international cooperationHarm prevention, protection of life and cooperationB19, B18

Communication with external frames

The UN’s Agenda for the period up to 2030 includes 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets. The book’s classifier does not replace them and does not approve official recognition. A table of correspondences at the task and indicator level is proposed, rather than a matching by number of directions. [I04]

Working examples of comparison: D01 — SDGs 3; D04 — SDGs 6; D07 — SDGs 8; D09 — SDGs 4; D11 — SDGs 7; D13 — SDGs 11; D19 — SDGs 16 and 17. This is an editorial map of the links, not an external assessment of the compliance achieved04]

The direction has a coordinator, a list of tasks, the boundaries of solutions and connections with other directions. The coordinator does not receive authority over all participants just because of his position in the classifier.

CHAPTER 08

19 related balances: method of management

Balances are the basis of a management system when they not only describe the balances, but also link needs, available opportunities, flows, constraints, and responsible decisions. At the same time, the balance itself does not work: you need rules of choice, the performer, resources and feedback.

Two types of presentation

Flow-stock representation is applied where comparable units are defined: water, energy, materials, money by currency. The representation of status and outcome applies to health, education, culture, and institutions. The second type cannot be mechanically attributed to the laws of conservation of the first.

What Makes Balances Linked

The link describes the specific impact: water requires energy; production requires materials and skills; and human recovery involves transportation, labor, and the availability of an environment. Communication has a direction, a reason, a period and a degree of confidence. Causal effects are not considered to be proven just because the two variables have changed simultaneously.

RulePractical investigation
One entity, one identifierOne object, payment or delivery does not become a new result when it appears in another report.
Borders and periodsBefore the comparison, the territory, population, currency, units and date are checked.
Flows between nodes are agreedThe transfer of the resource from the sender and the receipt from the addressee are linked by a common operation.
Incomparable is not summed upRubles, years of life, hectares and kW·h remain different axes of assessment.
The external effect is revealedImproving one balance is checked for load or damage to others.

For natural accounting, the external methodological guide is SEEA Ecosystem Accounting: the system considers the area, the state of ecosystems and ecosystem services in spatial representation. The specific passport of the book is its own design scheme; compliance with SEEA has yet to be verified separately. [I05]

Chapter 08 • PRACTICAL MODEL

How One Decision Changes Multiple Balances

Below is an exclusively educational calculation for a conditional water supply area. The numbers are not the data of the real object, investment valuation or the declared result of the current program.

Amount for the same periodInitial scenarioScenario after repair
Water supply to the boundaries of the site, m³100 00088 000
Useful transfer to consumers, m³75 00075 000
Losses within the boundaries of the site, m³20 0008 000
Stock increase, m³5 0005 000
Checking equality100 000 = 75 000 + 20 000 + 5 00088 000 = 75 000 + 8 000 + 5 000
Conditional specific energy, kW·h/m³0,600,60
Power consumption, kW·h60 00052 800

What can be concluded in the framework of assumptions

With constant useful transfer and the same increase in stock, the required supply is reduced by 12 000 m³. Losses are reduced by 60%, The share of losses in the supply is changing with 20,0% up to approximately 9,1%. These are different indicators, they can not be called the same savings.

With a conditional constant specific energy, the calculated reduction is 7 200 KW·h. The real energy effect must be checked by measurements: a change in pressure and operating mode can change the specific flow rate. No cash effect is specified, since the tariff, repair cost and maintenance in the example are not specified.

Map of links

BalanceWhat is changing or needs to be checked
B03 - waterFiling, loss and comparability of accounting.
B04 - energyEstimated energy demand; actual readings are a separate check.
B07 - FinancialRepair costs, maintenance and confirmed payments.
B08 — infrastructureCondition of the site and expected service life.
B02 and B12The possible effect for the source and humans is not proven by this calculation; separate observations are required.

Decision condition: the initial limits are preserved; the quality and reliability of the service are not deteriorated; loss reduction is confirmed; negative effects are disclosed. Alternative explanations and comparable periods are further compared to approve the causal contribution of the repair.

CHAPTER 09

Measurement framework 13 × 20

The matrix contains 20 blocks of 13 measurement positions: the first 19 correspond to directions D01–D19, while the twentieth is for coordination between systems. D20 is not the twentieth balance. There are 260 slots for indicator profiles, not 260 measurements already obtained.

AxisWhat is being checkedExample of indicator form
M01. NeedScale of Unsatisfied TaskNumber of people in need or deficit.
M02. CoverageProportion of need actually provided by serviceSecured/needy, %.
M03. QualityFulfillment of a predetermined criterionCorresponding checks/all checks, %.
M04. TermTime from request to resultMedian and upper quantile waiting days.
M05. ContinuityAvailability of services for the periodAvailability time / required time, %.
M06. Resource EfficiencyResult per unit of resourceUseful output / spent resource.
M07. Availability at costLoad on userCost of service / affordable income, %.
M08. LossesLoss of resource or resultLosses/input, %.
M09. SecurityUndesirable consequencesIncidents on the scope of activity.
M10. RecoveryCorrection of the disturbed conditionRemediation tasks performed, %.
M11. SustainabilityAbility to withstand failureReserve days or recovery time.
M12. InclusionDifferentiation of access between groupsCoverage gap in percentage points.
M13. ConfirmationVerifiability of resultResults with sufficient evidence, %.

What should be in every passport

Code; meaning; unit; formula; numerator and denominator; boundary; period; source; data owner; method of verification; uncertainty; desired direction of change; conditions of inapplicability. The target value is chosen after the initial measurement and agreement, and not for a beautiful chart.

Some axes are not applicable to individual blocks. Such positions are given the status of "not applicable" with an explanation; the lack of data is a separate status. Neither is replaced by a zero. 260 is the capacity of the working circuit, and not the requirement to invent an unnecessary indicator.

A summary assessment is allowed only for exposed weights, rationing and sensitivity. Violation of rights or security threshold is not compensated by a high score in another area. A complete code register is provided in Appendix B.

CHAPTER 10

EQUILIBRIUM and execution architecture

EQUILIBRIUM is designed as a system of observation, coordination and feedback. Its purpose is to show the state, identify inconsistencies in decisions and return the verified result to the general memory. This is not a single all-powerful operator and not a substitute for professional responsibility.

ComponentProposed functionThe main exit
EQUILIBRIUMMonitoring, scenarios, control of connections and changes.A picture of the state and reasonable signals for decision.
SFERAInteraction of people, organizations and project teams.Clear requests, suggestions and agreed roles.
ECO-PPAMobilization of resources and harmonization of commitments.Confirmed assurance of a specific action.
SPECZASHCHITAOrganization of execution within the limits of contracts and powers.Work accomplished, documents and elimination of comments.
The Accounting GroupMethodology, identifiers, reconciliation and consolidation.Comparable balances without double counting.
Computational GridShare computing tasks and resources.Reproducible calculation with data version and model.
State ConstructorRelationship of objects, technologies, territory and life cycle.Coordinated configuration of the development program.
Validation CentersChecking data and results with independence disclosure.Conclusion on the sufficiency of evidence.

Working cycle

Monitoring → meaning → Classification → script → solution → Action → Result → Proof → Lesson → new rule. Each link keeps in touch with the previous one. The model signal can initiate verification, but does not itself become a confirmed fact or a mandatory order.

Levels of access and separation of functions

The social layer shows the tasks, approved solutions, aggregated results and sources. The working layer contains details of projects. A limited layer stores personal, contractual and other protected data. The verifier shall not confirm his own work without disclosing a conflict of interest and additional control.

The proposed interactions with the RF CCI, ASI, scientific institutions and threat assessment bodies are formalized by separate agreements. Mentioning such roles in the concept does not confirm their acceptance by the organizations concerned.

CHAPTER 11

Communities, institutions and peaceful cooperation

A strong community is not built on a consensus. It arises around understandable common objectives, mutual benefit, rules of engagement, and the ability to resolve differences. The participant must see not only the purpose of the merger, but also his own voice, the boundaries of obligations and the way out.

Proposed institutional model

Project InstituteFunctionLimitation
Meeting of participantsDiscussion of objectives, selection of representatives and rules of participation.It does not replace the public authority of the state.
Directions CouncilAlignment of needs and cross-sectoral linkages.It does not have the right to appropriate assets or impose participation.
Scientific and Expert CouncilMethods, examination and analysis of uncertainty.It separates scientific findings from value preferences.
Project OfficeTerms, resources, executors and log of decisions.It does not accept its accountability for independent evaluation.
Independent reviewComplaints, conflicts of interest and reasonableness checks.Has access to the necessary evidence with data protection.

Cooperation and trade unions

Entrepreneurs, cooperatives and workers’ representatives are involved in the harmonization of production tasks, working conditions, training and risk distribution. Voluntary cooperation does not negate contractual autonomy. Project savings should not be achieved by hidden deterioration of working conditions or transfer of family costs.

The Collective Security Council — A Project Role

In the book, this is the name of the proposed platform for risk assessment and peaceful cooperation. It can compare threats to basic life systems, organize expert dialogue and propose preparedness measures. It is not attributed to the powers of the existing international bodies, the right to use coercion or self-management of armed structures.

Practical Peace Programme

The first set of joint tasks is assistance to victims, water and shelter rehabilitation, exchange of professional knowledge, cultural ties and safe civil projects. Each initiative receives an agreed mandate, a range of participants, a publicly explicable goal and a harm prevention mechanism. Political differences do not become the collective fault of the population.

The image of “the planet as one state” in this edition is read as a horizon of compatibility and common responsibility. Any proposals for real political and legal reforms require an independent legal process and free coordination; symbolic unity does not replace it.

CHAPTER 12

Finance, funds and resources

The financial system of the project should make it possible to act and at the same time show the limit of obligations. Key principle: the resource is not considered available by the name of the document, but after checking the owner, the basis of the order, restrictions, time and possibility of actual use.

Fund System of the New Order

ContourPurposeTrust condition
Personal and familyConsideration of agreed goals, human rights and participation in the results.No assessment of personality as collateral; voluntariness and confidentiality.
CooperativeCo-provision of works and distribution of results.Rules of contribution, expenses, participation in management and exit.
ProjectFunds for a specific amount of work and life cycle.Confirmed sources and milestone terms of spending.
Community and RehabilitationSupport for the common good and repairing the damage.Transparent assignment, access criteria and independent monitoring.

"Man - Bank": working reading

In conceptual language, this formula emphasizes the independence of a person and his participation in the creation of value. To implement it, it is transferred to account for personal goals, rights, competencies, contributions and agreed payments. The book does not attribute banking status to a person, does not create a monetary emission and does not recognize the obligations of third parties by the mere fact of personal registration.

ECO-PPA and confirmation of the resource result

In this book ECO-PPA is a project outline of resource mobilization. Its registry shares the intent, the agreed commitment, the available resource, the delivery completed and the work undertaken. For the energy project, the right to order, volume and schedule of delivery, measurement, quality, cost, restrictions and liability are separately checked.

The product statement, the 30 forecast and the digital token are not considered here to be proof of the energy already produced. The unit of account kW·h is not equal to a monetary obligation without a separate contractual basis. Title, pledge, set-off and right of claim are considered only on the basis of audited documents and after a specialized legal assessment.

Life cycle financing

Estimates include the preparation, implementation, operation, maintenance, verification of the result, restoration and completion of the project. Income, grant, loan, contribution and savings are shown separately. The next step shall be allowed after confirmation of the result of the previous one, if it is provided by the agreed conditions.

The specific amounts, returns and sources of funding for this book are not approved. Their absence is not hidden by contingent assets; they must appear in the passports of real pilots.

CHAPTER 13

State Constructor and Productive Forces

The State Constructor is proposed as a system for coordinating development, rather than a showcase of proposals. It connects territory, need, technology, production complex, infrastructure, resource cycle and 19 balances. The name refers to the project concept, not the fact of the creation of a state body.

Eight layers of the project model

LayerContents
1. Territory and populationSpatial boundaries, resettlement, access to services and restrictions.
2. Biosphere and resourcesWater, soil, ecosystems, materials and regenerative capacity.
3. EnergySources, networks, modes, measurement and reliability of supply.
4. Transport and infrastructureConnectivity, logistics, housing, housing and utilities and the life cycle of objects.
5. Science and competenceInstitutes, laboratories, education, skills and testing base.
6. ProductionTechnological chains, capacities, products, maintenance and processing.
7. Cooperation and financeParticipants, contracts, funds, confirmed resources and obligations.
8. Management and dataPassports, solutions, validation cards, balances and feedback.

New Order Complex

The complex is described through a function, not just a set of buildings. It integrates research, materials, production, energy, repair, training, quality management and resource recovery. Ceramics and synthetic crystals are preserved as separate classes of materials; their suitability is determined by the task and results of the tests, and not by belonging to a common image of the future.

The Master Plan 2050, Eight Macroregion Profiles and Register of 50 Complexes packages are retained as separate project sources. Their complete lists are not recreated from memory or declared approved in this edition; source files are added through the register in Appendix D.

The designer's pilot must show at least one closed chain: → tested technology → manufacture → operation → measured result → service. Scaling without this chain increases the number of objects, but does not prove the performance of the system.

CHAPTER 14

Science, GRID and the study of the future

The book supports a broad research horizon: machine science, materials science, physical chemistry, plasma, biosphere processes, digital models and rehabilitation methods. The novelty of the idea is a basis for research, but not ready proof of its effectiveness or safety.

Ladder of Evidence

StageWhat is required for the transition
Idea and hypothesisClear statement, scope, intended mechanism and method of verification.
ModelExplicit assumptions, data, boundary conditions, sensitivity, and computational verification.
Laboratory testProtocol, equipment, raw data, error evaluation and repeatability.
Independent playbackSufficient materials for other competent team and comparison of results.
Limited pilotControl of risks, agreed criteria and the possibility of a safe stop.
OperationMaintenance, monitoring, incident analysis and periodic reassessment.

Planetary GRID / Metacomputer

In a project sense, it is the sharing of distributed computing resources through understandable interfaces, access rules and reproducible tasks. Combining capacities alone does not create a common mind and does not guarantee the acceleration of any task. For each calculation, data, program version, parameters, restrictions and the result are stored.

Hypergraphs and digital models

The hypergraph in the proposed model relates many participants, objects, resources, and rules in one relation. For example, the rehabilitation route simultaneously includes a person, specialists, device, transport and fund. Such a record helps not to lose contact, but the quality of the solution still depends on the completeness of the data and the verifiability of assumptions.

Space and philosophical horizon

The topics of “density change”, “measurement change”, Law of One, galactic keys and time cycles are preserved in a separate philosophical and research layer. They are not used in the book as a confirmed physical mechanism for controlling weather, energy, or health. The testable hypothesis is granted a separate research passport; the symbolic interpretation retains its status.

New energy solutions require a transparent balance of input and output energy, storage accounting and independent testing. An untested characteristic is not included in the guaranteed capacity of the infrastructure and does not become the basis for financial support.

CHAPTER 15

Validation Map and Heritage Preservation Archive

The validation map shows not only the content of the statement, but also the limit of what is known. Each significant record should allow you to restore who, when, by what method and on what basis the result was obtained. The principle of data origin is useful guide W3C PROV, describing the relationships between entities, actions, and participants in the creation of information07]

StatusSignificance in the book
C - value positionThe basis of choice; it is not presented as an empirical discovery.
P - project proposalDesired organization of action; requires coordination and verification of feasibility.
G - HypothesisProbable assumption; result not yet established.
M - model calculationOutput within the disclosed assumptions and raw data.
H - ObservationRecorded measurement or documented fact with source.
B - Confirmed conclusionA conclusion supported by sufficient evidence in this area.
C. The disputed claimThere are objections, conflicting sources or insufficient verification.

One-Heaven as a Comparative Source

The One-Heaven main page archive of 25 June 2014 contains links to spiritual texts, canons, participatory, banking, and judicial sections. It confirms the publication of such names, but does not in itself certify the legal status of the designated structures. This book uses the source to compare designs, not to recognize universal jurisdiction. [I01]

The Covenant of 19 articles and the seven functional levels of this book are a separate development. Historical statements about trusts, title, assumed obligations and similar structures are not accepted without a separate verification of the primary documents and applicable law.

Live Archive

The document receives the identifier, original title, author, version, date, source, access rights and project links. The original version is not replaced by a later edition: history is stored. The checksum helps to detect a file change, but does not confirm the truth of its content or the validity of the signature.

Artificial Intelligence and Responsibility

AI can help classify and compare data. Significant decisions preserve the responsible person, the reason log and the challenge order. NIST AI RMF is considered as a voluntary risk management framework AI; reference to it does not mean project certification or automatic model safety. [I06]

CHAPTER 16

Five pilots of the first cycle

The pilot is a limited test of the work chain, not a reduced advertising version of the global program. For each pilot, participants, boundary, initial state, success criterion, resource limit, risks and stopping conditions are determined in advance. None of the pilots described in this book is declared funded or launched.

Pilot 1. "Second Breath"

Task: to connect vocational rehabilitation, accessible environment, technical means, training and return to the chosen types of daily activities. Contour: D01, D07, D10, D12; B12, B13, B09. Result: change in agreed roles and availability of assistance. Evidence: initial assessment, professional surveillance protocol, participant feedback and list of undesirable events.

Entry to the pilot is voluntary. The number of participants and the duration are determined after evaluating the capabilities of the team. Professional help is not replaced by a digital rating; the negative result is not hidden by the exclusion of the participant from the report.

Pilot 2. Water and water balance »

Objective: to show the measurable effect of maintenance and reduction of losses on one site. Contour: D04, D11, D13; B03, B04, B08, B07. Result: confirmed change in losses while maintaining quality and useful delivery. Evidence: Uniform boundaries, metering devices, comparable periods, work log and verification of alternative causes of change.

A critical risk is to accept the change in readings due to the replacement of the technique for real savings. The condition of stopping is a deterioration in the safety or quality of service. The training example of Chapter 08 shows the form of calculation, but does not replace the original site data.

Pilot 3. "Living soil and food"

Objective: to compare the selected site management practices with the initial state and, where possible, with a comparable site. Contour: D05, D06, D04; B02, B05, B03. Result: measured changes in soil, product, resource consumption and risk. Proof: Sample location, season, method, weather conditions and treatment description.

The name "biodynamic" does not in itself serve as proof of advantage. Each practice is evaluated separately; the impact of weather and site differences is disclosed. Monetary and biophysical results are not combined without an explicit methodology.

Chapter 16 • CONTINUATION

Pilots of the system, not just technology

Pilot 4. "City of Knowledge and Cooperation"

Task: to connect one educational platform, research team and production participants around a specific useful task. Contour: D09, D08, D10, D07; B10, B14, B11, B09. Result: confirmed skill development and completed work with a clear customer and user.

Indicators: access to the program, completion, practical development, task performance, safety and sustainability of cooperation. The number of meetings and certificates is not considered a sufficient result. In the Safari Park + City of Knowledge, natural and educational contours are additionally checked for restrictions on the handling of living systems.

Pilot 5. "The perfect document"

Task: to conduct one inter-organizational program through common identifiers, versions, solutions, confirmation of resources and acceptance of the result. Contour: D15, D18, D16; B16, B18, B07. Result: Participants restore the origin of the solution and the state of obligations without manually searching for uncoordinated archives.

Indicators: search time, share of records with origin, number of uncoordinated versions, speed of error correction and data recovery success. Automation is not considered a success if it makes the wrong decision less noticeable or deprives the person of the possibility of objection.

A single scheme for the reception of five pilots

VerificationCondition of completion of the stage
Authority and participationThe roles, consent and limits of data use are fixed.
Baseline stateThe reference point and comparability of future measurements have been determined.
ResourcesThe work and subsequent maintenance have confirmed security.
ActionThere is a journal of actually completed works and deviations.
ResultA useful output is shown; actions and effect are not mixed.
EvidenceVerification independence is disclosed, limitations and errors are saved.
DecisionSelect: Continue, change, repeat, pause or terminate.

All five pilots use the same application form B. This allows you to compare the manageability of programs without forcing different areas to measure the beneficial effect with the same physical magnitude.

CHAPTER 17

Road map for 365 days

Day 0 is the date of a separate launch decision after confirmation of participants and resources. It is not automatically assigned by the date of publication of the book. The calendar below is a project sequence with control conditions, not a promise of an inevitable outcome.

StageWorkResult for the transition
Days 0–30
Grounds
Alignment of purpose, participants, boundaries, roles, and constraints. choice of pilots.Signed or otherwise duly executed grounds for participation; owners of tasks.
Days 31–60
Original picture
Passports of objects, initial measurements, register of documents and risk map.Sufficient baseline data; identified gaps are not hidden.
Days 61–90
Design
Solution options, life cycle estimates, contracts and a verification plan.Confirmed first-stage security and clear acceptance conditions.
Days 91–180
Implementation
Limited launch, monitoring, event registration and adjustments.Works completed; incidents reviewed; data available for review.
Days 181–270
Verification
Comparison of results, repeated checks and analysis of side effects.Conclusion on the result with restrictions and decision on continuation.
Days 271–365
Fixing
Maintenance, Knowledge Transfer, Book Update and Next Cycle Selection.Steady-state or documented termination; published lessons.

Control rhythm

The team keeps a log of events as they occur. The working review checks actions and obstacles. The monthly review checks resources, liabilities and balance sheet changes. The quarterly review examines the quality of the result, the risks and the reasons to continue the program. The frequency is specified by the risk and speed of the process.

What to expect at the end of the first cycle

Not a report on the built world system, but several proven management chains; initial and final data; current passports of balances; a recoverable register of documents; clear rules of collaboration; decisions on scaling those approaches that really stood the test.

CHAPTER 18

Risks, restrictions and stopping conditions

A risk system is needed not to abandon bold goals, but to detect errors early before they affect people and the sustainability of the program. The risk is received by the owner, a sign of the onset, a measure of reduction and a pre-agreed action.

RiskEarly signProtective action
Mixing image and factA symbol or hypothesis is used as evidence.Return approval to correct status; assign verification.
Insufficient authorityThere is no reason to manage the resource or data.Suspend the action until confirmed.
Unconfirmed fundingThe estimate is based on promises or a controversial title.Not to accept new obligations; to reassign security.
Double countingOne delivery or effect is shown several times.Verify consolidation identifiers and boundaries.
Invalid dataNo origin, methodology or comparable period.Exclude from the confirmed result by saving the error record.
Harm to manDeterioration of security, availability or data protection is violated.Immediate protection of participants and profile investigation.
Harm to the biosphereNegative change beyond agreed limits.Stop the impact and execute the recovery plan.
Concentration of controlOne party sets the data, the solution and their own verification.Divide functions and include independent review.
Unsustainable serviceNo personnel, spare parts, budget or responsible.Do not scale; restore the operating model.
Distrust and exclusion of peopleParticipants do not understand the conditions or cannot challenge the decision.Review communication, access and complaint procedure.

Unconditional reasons for pause

Immediate threat to life; material violation of the agreed rights of participants; work outside the confirmed authority; substitution of primary data; unsecured obligations that threaten the continuation of a critical service. Specific thresholds and emergency procedures are defined in the pilot’s passport before launch.

Disassembly without concealment

After an incident, data is stored, participants are protected and the immediate cause, organizational conditions and system error are shared. Resumption requires a confirmed elimination of the cause, not just a new promise. Closing a failed pilot with a useful lesson is better to continue for the sake of a beautiful report.

CHAPTER 19

Adoption, updating and general commitment

The white paper is proposed as an open architecture of joint action. It allows for step-by-step acceptance: the participant can agree on the goals of a particular pilot and the rules for verification, without taking all the philosophical positions or the whole long-term image of the future.

Method of adoption

First, the boundaries of application, principles and prohibitions on the substitution of facts are discussed. Working classifiers, roles, pilots, and recording forms are then agreed upon. After checking the resources and powers, a separate decision on the launch is made. Just reading the book does not create obligations.

Modification order

The proposal receives the identifier, the author, the justification, the articles affected and the evaluation of the consequences. The editorial group publishes a comparison of versions and collects objections. Changes in the principles, rights of participants and resource obligations are not masked by technical changes. The new version fixes the date of action and the transitional order.

What is saved regardless of the version

Human dignity; voluntariness of participation; distinction of knowledge and assumptions; verifiability of significant results; transparency of authority; responsibility for consequences; the right to correction and revision. The format of the registry, the number of working services and specific design decisions may change when justified.

Immediate solutions for harmonization

DecisionSubject of approval
РД-01Adopt the master document’s name and purpose while preserving the history of the White Paper of Destiny.
РД-02Review the author’s 16 KON Principles and the 19 articles of the Covenant; record comments.
РД-03Compare the D01–D19 and B01–B19 classifiers with the original profiles of earlier works.
РД-04Select a limited set of pilots, participants and launch conditions.
РД-05Start downloading source documents and confirming resource support.

ANNEX A

Passports 19

Working editorial nomenclature. Passports describe the subject matter; initial values, target levels, data owners, and methods of real objects are determined at startup. Numbering requires matching with previous source forms.

B01. Demographic

Border. Population of the territory and movement of age groups; without monetary valuation of a person.

Indicators and Units. Number by age, person; birth, death and migration for the period, person.

Communications. B12, B13, B10. First action. Agree territory boundaries, date and sources; separate observation from scenario.

B02. Natural and Biosphere

Border. Ecosystems within fixed spatial boundaries: area, state and function.

Indicators and Units. Area by type, ha; proportion of surveyed areas, %; status profile according to the method.

Communications. B03, B05, B04. First action. Create a map of sites and a program of repeated observations; do not reduce all nature to one price.

B03. Water

Border. Water intake, supply, storage, use, return and loss; quality is taken into account separately.

Indicators and Units. Volumes for the period, m³; change of stocks, m³; quality of samples according to the chosen method.

Communications. B02, B04, B08. First action. Approve accounting points, devices, intervals and the list of permissible adjustments.

B04. Energetic

Border. Production, import, conversion, consumption, export and energy storage.

Indicators and Units. Power, kW·h; power, kW; separate heat profile; supply interruptions, h.

Communications. B03, B06, B07. First action. Separate power and output; compare meters, contracts and actual delivery.

ANNEX A • CONTINUATION

Balance profiles B05–B08

B05. Food

Border. Food flows and stocks by comparable categories; nutrition is a separate estimate.

Indicators and Units. Release, import, export, consumption and loss, by category; days of security.

Communications. B02, B03, B12. First action. Select the base basket and traceability; do not fold different products without a basis.

B06. Material and production

Border. Materials, products, production facilities, secondary resources and waste.

Indicators and Units. Flows of materials, t by type; output, units; available capacity; return share, %.

Communications. B04, B11, B15. First action. Collect specifications, routes and test passports; exclude the re-registration of one product.

B07. Financial

Border. Money, confirmed claims, liabilities and sources of coverage for owners and currencies.

Indicators and Units. Balances and flows in each currency; payment terms; cash gap; service cost.

Ties. All balances through costs and liabilities. First action. Separate actual funds from applications and forecasts; confirm grounds and authority.

B08. Infrastructure

Border. Physical housing, housing and general infrastructure; transport services - in B15.

Indicators and Units. Objects, units; network length, km; power by type; defects; life cycle costs.

Communications. B03, B04, B15. First action. Create object passports and a service plan; distinguish between the availability of the object and the quality of the service.

ANNEX A • CONTINUATION

Balance profiles B09–B12

B09. Labour and Competence

Border. Jobs, available working hours, qualifications and safety.

Indicators and Units. Employed and vacancies, people; man-hours; confirmed skills; security violations.

Communications. B10, B14, B13. First action. Compare the demand for work with voluntary participation of people and training programs.

B10. Educational and knowledge

Border. Educational needs, access to training, development of competencies and transfer of knowledge.

Indicators and Units. Participants, persons; training places; completion of programs, %; confirmed results of development.

Communications. B09, B11, B17. First action. Identify ways to assess development, not just hours of presence or number of certificates.

B11. Scientific and technological

Border. Research, hypothesis, testing and maturity of technologies within specific tasks.

Indicators and Units. Experiments and reproductions, etc.; criteria fulfilled; availability of equipment, h.

Communications. B06, B10, B16. First action. Disperse idea, prototype, validation and operation; maintain negative results.

B12. Health and functional independence

Border. Needs for assistance, availability of services and changes in human functions; sensitive data is protected.

Indicators and Units. Waiting for help, days; coverage of needy, %; agreed functional outcomes.

Communications. B01, B05, B13. First action. Approve consent, route of assistance and professional evaluation criteria; do not promise a therapeutic effect.

ANNEX A • CONTINUATION

Balance profiles B13–B16

B13. Social Welfare

Border. Availability of basic goods and support; distribution of results among groups.

Indicators and Units. Unmet needs, people; family spending on basic services, %; availability of support.

Communications. B07, B09, B12. First action. Describe the criteria of need, data protection and the procedure for appealing the refusal.

B14. Entrepreneurial and cooperative

Border. Sustainability of production links, execution of contracts and participation of cooperative associations.

Indicators and Units. Active contracts, units; execution on time, %; terms of calculations, days; repeated orders.

Communications. B06, B07, B09. First action. Verify the reality of supply and distribution of responsibility; do not count the number of participants as a success.

B15. Transport and logistics

Border. Movements of people and goods and availability of routes; infrastructure facilities are connected with B08.

Indicators and Units. Access time, min; passenger-km; ton-km; reliability of delivery, %; downtime, h.

Communications. B06, B08, B04. First action. Describe bottlenecks and load calculation; do not duplicate the cost of objects in two balances.

B16. Information and computing

Border. Data, communication, computing tasks, availability of services and the origin of results.

Indicators and Units. Availability, %; delay, s; jobs, ed.; verified records, %; energy consumption.

Communications. B11, B18, B04. First action. Enter identifiers, version control, access log, and recovery test from the backup.

ANNEX A • CONTINUATION

Balance profiles B17–B19

B17. Cultural and Heritage

Border. Heritage objects and practices, access rights, state of preservation and memory transfer.

Indicators and Units. Described units, units; verified digital copies, %; community participation; knowledge transfer events.

Communications. B10, B13, B16. First action. Record origin, authorship, and consent; not assign someone else's heritage to the common system.

B18. Institutional and legal

Border. Powers, decisions, agreements, control procedures and consideration of appeals.

Indicators and Units. Decisions with responsibility, %; response period, days; disputes considered; conflicts of interest.

Communications. B07, B16, B19. First action. Establish a register of powers and a channel for independent review; separate the draft from the existing bodies.

B19. Security, Peace and Sustainability

Border. Threats, incidents, prevention of harm, readiness for recovery and peaceful interaction.

Indicators and Units. Incidents by class, unit; response and recovery time; proven preparedness measures.

Communications. B18, B08, B12. First action. Determine the thresholds for stopping hazardous work and the order of assistance; do not classify violations under the guise of protection.

ANNEX B

Register of measuring positions 260

The code is Pbb.mm: bb — block 01–20, mm — here M01–M13 from chapter 09. The same letter P is omitted in the table. For example, the cell 04.08 means P04.08 — Loss rate in the water direction. The table reserves places, not contains measured values.

BlockM01M02M03M04M05M06M07M08M09M10M11M12M13
D0101.0101.0201.0301.0401.0501.0601.0701.0801.0901.1001.1101.1201.13
D0202.0102.0202.0302.0402.0502.0602.0702.0802.0902.1002.1102.1202.13
D0303.0103.0203.0303.0403.0503.0603.0703.0803.0903.1003.1103.1203.13
D0404.0104.0204.0304.0404.0504.0604.0704.0804.0904.1004.1104.1204.13
D0505.0105.0205.0305.0405.0505.0605.0705.0805.0905.1005.1105.1205.13
D0606.0106.0206.0306.0406.0506.0606.0706.0806.0906.1006.1106.1206.13
D0707.0107.0207.0307.0407.0507.0607.0707.0807.0907.1007.1107.1207.13
D0808.0108.0208.0308.0408.0508.0608.0708.0808.0908.1008.1108.1208.13
D0909.0109.0209.0309.0409.0509.0609.0709.0809.0909.1009.1109.1209.13
D1010.0110.0210.0310.0410.0510.0610.0710.0810.0910.1010.1110.1210.13
D1111.0111.0211.0311.0411.0511.0611.0711.0811.0911.1011.1111.1211.13
D1212.0112.0212.0312.0412.0512.0612.0712.0812.0912.1012.1112.1212.13
D1313.0113.0213.0313.0413.0513.0613.0713.0813.0913.1013.1113.1213.13
D1414.0114.0214.0314.0414.0514.0614.0714.0814.0914.1014.1114.1214.13
D1515.0115.0215.0315.0415.0515.0615.0715.0815.0915.1015.1115.1215.13
D1616.0116.0216.0316.0416.0516.0616.0716.0816.0916.1016.1116.1216.13
D1717.0117.0217.0317.0417.0517.0617.0717.0817.0917.1017.1117.1217.13
D1818.0118.0218.0318.0418.0518.0618.0718.0818.0918.1018.1118.1218.13
D1919.0119.0219.0319.0419.0519.0619.0719.0819.0919.1019.1119.1219.13
D20*20.0120.0220.0320.0420.0520.0620.0720.0820.0920.1020.1120.1220.13

* D20 - Intersystem coordination: completeness of connections, execution of decisions, quality of summary data and ability to maintain the overall cycle. This is a measuring unit, not a new industry direction or an additional balance.

Status of completion

Design: meaning and method are still consistent. No data: passport is defined, no surveillance. Observation received: data is available, verification is not completed. Verified: conditions of confirmation are fulfilled. Inapplicable: there is a substantial justification for the exception. In this edition, all cells are a design reserve; no actual passports are declared.

Example of passport P04.08

The meaning is the share of water losses taken into account in the supply within the boundaries of the site. Formula - loss / supply × 100%. The unit is the percentage. The period and points of reference are the same for the numerator and denominator. At zero feed, the ratio is not calculated. Comparison is allowed after checking the boundaries, devices and mode. Training calculation of Chapter 08 does not change the status of the register to "verified".

APPENDIX C • FORM Ф-01

Passport of the project: standard of filling

Training filling on the conditional water section of chapter 08. It is not a work permit, a real contract or a report on the effect achieved. In a real passport, role designations are replaced by confirmed participants.

FieldEducational content
IDPRJ-DEMO-WATER-001; revision 1; status: model example.
Purpose and Result RecipientReduce water loss while maintaining useful transmission, quality and reliability of the service.
Directions and balancesD04, D11, D13; B03, B04, B08, B07. Possible links with B02 and B12 Requires separate evaluation.
BorderOne conditional area between the agreed input and output devices; same comparison period.
Baseline stateSupply 100 000 m³; transfer 75 000 m³; losses 20 000 m³; increase in storage 5 000 m³.
Hypothesis of actionRepair of the selected site can reduce losses without worsening the service. The causal contribution must be verified.
Target scenarioFeeding 88 000 m³; Transmission 75 000 m³; Losses 8 000 m³; Increase in stock 5 000 m³. It's a calculation, not a guarantee.
ResponsibilityOperator - data and service; executor - work; checker - comparability; coordinator - solution.
Grounds and consentPrior to the actual launch, rights to work, contracts, obligations and restrictions on the use of data are confirmed.
Resource supportRepair estimate, instrument inspection, maintenance and restoration reserve. No cash amounts are given.
Risks and stoppagesDeterioration of quality, interruption of service, incomparability of accounting, lack of security or authority.
AcceptanceComparable measurements, stored useful transmission, disclosed side effects, checker conclusion.
Next SolutionAfter checking: continue, change the project, repeat the measurement or complete the pilot.

How to use the form

The coordinator fills out the goal and the border together with the users of the result. The operator confirms the possibility of measurement. The Contractor and the owner of the resource agree on obligations. The examiner shall determine in advance the sufficiency of evidence. The acceptance signature is not put instead of the missing baseline measurement.

APPENDIX C • FORM Ф-02

Proof card and event log

Each significant record has its origin and limit of applicability. This card is a learning example; it cannot be assigned the status of an actual measurement just because the arithmetic is correct.

FieldMandatory content
Record IDUnique event or proof code associated with the project and object.
ApprovalWhat exactly is confirmed; without extending the output beyond the data.
StatusC, P, G, M, H, B or C under chapter 15; date of assignment and basis.
SourcePrimary file, instrument, protocol, data set or certificate; storage location.
Time and BorderEvent date, record date, time zone, object, territory and observation period.
MethodMethod of obtaining, unit, formula, equipment, program version and calibration, where applicable.
ResponsibleRecord creator, data owner and reviewer; disclosure of possible conflict of interest.
LimitationsGaps, errors, uncertainties, assumptions, and alternative explanations.
Access and CorrectionsAccess base; version history; fix by new record without hidden removal of source.
Result of verificationAccepted in this area, additional data is needed, rejected or disputed.

Educational Journal

IDEvent or approvalWithdrawal Status/Border
EV-DEMO-01The baseline values are defined as 100 000 / 75 000 / 20 000 / 5 000 m³.M - conditional baseline data, not instrument readings.
EV-DEMO-02The post-repair scenario is defined as 88 000 / 75 000 / 8 000 / 5 000 m³.M is the project scenario, not the work done.
EV-DEMO-03Two balance sheets are checked.M is the arithmetic consistency within the example.
EV-DEMO-04A difference of 7 200 kWh was calculated at 0,60 kWh/m³.M is a conditional calculation; no real energy efficiency has been established.
EV-DEMO-05Effects on health and the biosphere.D - possible influence; there are no confirmatory measurements in the example.

The transition from M to H requires real observation; from H to B, sufficient verification and a clear field of inference. A beautiful card or a check amount does not increase the status of the content.

APPENDIX C • FORMS Ф-03 AND Ф-04

Decision and balance sheet report

Ф-03. Decision card

FieldWhat is fixed
SubjectWhat need or problem is being addressed and why a solution is needed now.
OptionsActions considered, including maintaining the current position; limitations of each.
GroundsLinks to data, sources, advice and applicable regulations.
SelectionSelected action, reasons for rejection of alternatives, affected balances.
ResponsibilityWho accepts, who executes, who provides the resource, who checks.
ImplementationTerm, budget or other resource limit, acceptance conditions and stopping thresholds.
RevisionThe date of verification of the decision and the procedure for complaint or change with new data.

Ф-04. Balance change report

SectionWhat needs to be reflected
IdentificationBalance, object, territory, period, units and comparability with the previous version.
Initial and final statusState values or profile; missing data are marked separately.
ChangeDifferences, flows, reclassifications, accounting errors and comparison conditions.
Contribution of the programWhat can be attributed to the action and what alternative explanations remain.
ConnectionsEnergy, finance, nature, health and other affected balances; exclusion of re-accounting.
EvidencePrimary records, methods, limitations, verification and independence of the verifier.
Decision for the next periodContinuation, maintenance, rectification, additional research or termination.

Annex G

Register of previous works and packages

Inventory of 149 known names in the available project context. This is not an archive of complete texts. For all entries below, the source file is not included in the build; version and checksum are not set. The completion, signature and sending of packages are not verified.

RecordingKnown name of work or packageThematic outline
REG-001White Paper of DestinyGrounds
REG-002The Covenant of One Heaven — 19 articlesGrounds
REG-003One-Heaven — seven-level information and legal system: reconstruction, verification and integration with 19 balancesSources
REG-004Space OrderGrounds
REG-00516 KON Principles — The Foundation of the UniverseGrounds
REG-006Planetary lotusGrounds
REG-007Three flowers of life. Three Spheres in 19 SpheresGrounds
REG-008KRISTALL741Architecture
REG-009Doctrine of VictoryStrategy
REG-010Field Theory / Nodes / GraphsMethodology
REG-011Cycle TheoryMethodology
REG-012NEUROSVOD CivilizationsMethodology
REG-013Unified Science of Natural SystemsScience
REG-014Core Mathematics and Architecture EQUILIBRIUMScience
REG-015ORION 22:22Research
REG-016Quantum Leap of Density and MeasurementsResearch
REG-017Space SciencesResearch
REG-018Galactic Keys and GatesResearch
REG-019MetaCivilization ProjectStrategy
REG-020The New Order of KnowledgeStrategy

Annex D •

Register of works • records 021–040

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

RecordingKnown name of work or packageThematic outline
REG-021Unification of Renaissance SystemsStrategy
REG-022Map of AwakeningStrategy
REG-023EQUILIBRIUM - White PaperArchitecture
REG-024State program EQUILIBRIUMArchitecture
REG-025GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM" - early warningMonitoring
REG-026World Portal SFERAInteraction
REG-027World Film Portal — SFERACulture
REG-028ECO-PPA №001Resources
REG-029SFERA and EQUILIBRIUM + ECO-PPAResources
REG-030Mind Map ECO-PPAArchitecture
REG-031ESG-IR 1.0Validation
REG-032Indicator register and validation centresValidation
REG-033SPECZASHCHITA 1.0Implementation
REG-034Information and analytical center: assets and projectsOrganization
REG-035One State - ConceptInstitutions
REG-036The Planet as One StateInstitutions
REG-037ConsolidationCooperation
REG-038Planetary balanceBalances
REG-039Balance of BiosphereBalances
REG-040Man. Culture and global balanceBalances

Annex D •

Register of works • records 041–060

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

RecordingKnown name of work or packageThematic outline
REG-041Related balances 19 — unificationBalances
REG-042Balances as management systemsBalances
REG-043Russia — SUR: development management systemManagement
REG-044SUR — 810 codeResearch
REG-045The ideal document flowData
REG-046Heritage Preservation ArchiveHeritage
REG-047Validation mapValidation
REG-048Globe of MeaningsValidation
REG-049Biocenous labelsBiosphere
REG-050Dynamic Model of the BiosphereBiosphere
REG-051Monitoring and forecastingMonitoring
REG-052Design and planningManagement
REG-053HydrosphereBiosphere
REG-054AirBiosphere
REG-055Land useBiosphere
REG-056Analysis of Russian balance sheets for 30 yearsAnalysis
REG-057Balances for 130 years. Influence of the Academy of Sciences of the Russian Empire, USSR and RussiaAnalysis
REG-058China's Balances for 130 YearsAnalysis
REG-059Balances of the USAAnalysis
REG-060Synchronization of Russia, China and the United States - effects assessmentAnalysis

Annex D •

Register of works • records 061–080

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

RecordingKnown name of work or packageThematic outline
REG-061Balances by ministries and institutionsAnalysis
REG-062Inter-industry balance. Exits through meaningsAnalysis
REG-063Analysis of the balance of state corporations for 30 yearsAnalysis
REG-064Country management — State CorporationsManagement
REG-065Russia — Planning and Design SystemManagement
REG-066Russia — A New OrderStrategy
REG-067Russia - Risk ManagementManagement
REG-068State Designer of RussiaBuilder
REG-069Graf of Productive ForcesBuilder
REG-070General scheme of deployment of productive forces of Russia 2050Builder
REG-071Eight passports of macroregions of Russia 2050Territories
REG-072Register of 50 New Order ComplexesProduction
REG-073Industrial solutions in 19 directionsProduction
REG-074Mechanical Engineering of Russia — Complexes of the New OrderProduction
REG-075State basis of interdepartmental programsManagement
REG-076Materials of the New OrderMaterials
REG-077Ceramics and synthetic crystalsMaterials
REG-078Physical Chemistry of the New OrderScience
REG-079Physics of PlasmaScience
REG-080Robotics of the New OrderProduction

Annex D •

Register of works • records 081–100

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

RecordingKnown name of work or packageThematic outline
REG-081Mobilization complexesProduction
REG-082Russia — Transport of the FutureTransport
REG-083Transport 2035–2050Transport
REG-084Energy tariffs and carbon unitsEnergy
REG-085A concept for autonomous generation in the New World OrderResearch
REG-086Unified Construction PortalConstruction
REG-087Digital transformation of construction and housing and utilities up to 2030Construction
REG-088Package by decree: housing and constructionConstruction
REG-089IA — Intangible AssetsAccounting
REG-090NMA — world experience of assessment and accountingAccounting
REG-091The Accounting GroupAccounting
REG-092Computational GridCalculations
REG-093Planetary GRID / Metacomputer / Big DataCalculations
REG-094IMASH RAS - the structure of the InstituteScience
REG-095Hypergraphs IMASH RAS - external contoursScience
REG-096IMASH RAN - Computational GRID. Mathematics of Large NumbersScience
REG-097IMASH RAS - Interdepartmental SystemScience
REG-098The new financial system. Man — emission center and bankFinance
REG-099Personal and Named FundsFunds
REG-100Fund System of the New OrderFunds

Annex D •

Register of works • records 101–120

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

RecordingKnown name of work or packageThematic outline
REG-101Cooperative funds and personal fundsFunds
REG-102Global Energy PPAResources
REG-103New World Order — 19 directionsProgrammes
REG-104New World Order - EducationEducation
REG-105New World Order — HealthHealth
REG-106People and healthHealth
REG-107Water and water balanceWater
REG-108Natural climate, living soil and foodBiosphere
REG-109Natural climate / Biodynamic farmingBiosphere
REG-110New World Order - ChildrenChildren
REG-111Poverty alleviationSocial support
REG-112Decent work, income and economic independence of the familyWork
REG-113New World Order — EntrepreneurshipCooperation
REG-114CooperationCooperation
REG-115Cooperation and trade unionsWork
REG-116New World Order - SecuritySecurity
REG-117New World Order - FinanceFinance
REG-118How do we stop the war?Peace
REG-119The Collective Security CouncilPeace
REG-120Density change. Change of Measurements. One GoalResearch

Annex D •

Register of works • records 121–140

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

RecordingKnown name of work or packageThematic outline
REG-121Strong communities — bringing people togetherCommunity
REG-122Culture. Science. CivilizationCulture
REG-123Cities of KnowledgeEducation
REG-124Safari Park + City of KnowledgeTerritories
REG-125Knowledge and EnergyEducation
REG-126Unified Lineage SystemCommunity
REG-127World BuilderBuilder
REG-128the Fire of Knowledge RelayCulture
REG-129World Christian GamesCulture
REG-130Social Programmes of the New OrderSocial support
REG-131Integrated rehabilitation systemRehabilitation
REG-132Second BreathRehabilitation
REG-133Materials of the New Order — ProstheticsRehabilitation
REG-134Science and production — BiocenosesScience
REG-135Systemic rehabilitationRehabilitation
REG-136Cognitive habilitation and personalized 3D food printingRehabilitation
REG-137Reference formsMethodology
REG-138Russia - Soft PowerCulture
REG-139Dumin's package to the State CouncilAddress Package
REG-140Letter from A. R. Belousov - The essence of strategic decisions. BalancesAddress Package

Annex D •

Register of works • records 141–149

General status: name known; source file not included; version not installed. The designations REG are assigned only for navigation of this edition.

RecordingKnown name of work or packageThematic outline
REG-141A package of documents for the head of the FSB - Bortnikova A. B.Address Package
REG-142Package Civil A.Address Package
REG-143Letters to Putin and Lukashenko — United StateAddress Package
REG-144Package for Anthony de Rothschild - Russian and English versionsAddress Package
REG-145The Rothschild package is the New World Order. Image of the FutureAddress Package
REG-146Letter to Rothschild — foreclosure of generationAddress Package
REG-147The Rothschild Family TreeResearch
REG-148Formation of the Rothschilds. Anthony de RothschildResearch
REG-149Charter 1820, Code of laws of the Russian Empire and constitutional models - comparative analysisResearch

Method of insertion of source documents

After receiving the file, the original name and original date are saved; the version, authorship, access rights, checksum and links to directions are determined. Similar names are not considered the same documents without comparison. The new version is associated with the previous one, and does not erase it.

Identifier REG denotes an inventory record, not proof of the existence of a signed document. The list is open for addition and verification; the completeness of the entire personal archive of this book is not declared.

Annex D

Sources and Reliability Map

External sources were verified by 09.09.2026. Links lead to primary publications, official pages or archive of the primary site. They only support explicitly noted factual information; the book's own suggestions do not receive automatic recognition from them.

[I01] One-Heaven. Main page. Archived image 25.06.2014, 06:31:05.

Open Source

Confirms the presence of navigation sections and names in the picture. Does not confirm the legal force, authority, property or execution of the declared structures.

[AND02] ISO/IEC 7498-1:1994. Information technology — Open Systems Interconnection — Basic Reference Model: The Basic Model.

Open Source

Official card ISO. It is used to distinguish between the network model and the author's seven-level scheme. Conformity or certification of the project is not declared.

[I03] OHCHR. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. English translation.

Open Source

External reference point of equal dignity, rights and freedom of conscience. Full legal analysis of applicability to specific activities was not performed.

[I04] UN. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Open Source

The source of the structure is 17 SDGs and 169 tasks. Comparison with the directions of the book is an editorial map, not a UN assessment.

How the references are indicated

The designation [Ixx] relates a specific factual statement to a source. Normative articles, formulas of the educational example, classifiers, road map and forms are the author's project content of this edition. They cannot be cited as an externally confirmed assessment of the current system.

Annex D • Extension

Validity limits and next verification cycle

[I05] UN. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Ecosystem Accounting. Methodological page.

Open Source

A landmark of spatial accounting of the area, the state of ecosystems and services. Compliance with their own passports SEEA is not established.

[I06] NIST. AI Risk Management Framework. Official page of the program.

Open Source

Source of information on the voluntary risk management framework AI. For implementation, a specific revision is fixed; this is not a certificate of certification.

[I07] W3C. PROV-Overview. 30.04.2013.

Open Source

Overview of the PROV family and approach to data origin. The book cards are a project format, not a declared implementation of all of the PROV specifications.

What is checked in this edition

Checked individual external information marked by sources; arithmetic 3 × 19 × 13 = 741 and 13 × 20 = 260; educational water-energy calculation; consistency of internal codes of directions and balances. This is not an audit of the future system, its partners or financial reasons.

What remains project-based

The texts of the 16 KON Principles and 19 articles; the names of the three Spheres; 13 node fields; D and B classifiers; measurement axes and 260 positions; governing bodies; partner roles; pilots; launch schedule; forms. Approval of these elements requires separate agreement.

What requires source documents and independent verification

Full versions of previous works; legal status and powers of participants; rights to assets; contracts and financing; technical characteristics of devices; test results and medical outcomes. The book does not recognize this information as confirmed only on the basis of the previous discussion or the name of the package.

Characteristics of archival sources

The date of the archive image refers to a specific page. A link can open a different time frame; the date should be recorded for each page separately. The full One-Heaven case is not included in this edition. Its detailed structure and controversial legal claims require independent source research work.

Another published edition: White Paper of Shared Destiny — presentation Belaya_kniga_Edinoy_Sudby_presentation_v1_0.pptx · web text +

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

02

The meaning of the book: a single fate as a system of action

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

A common destiny is not uniformity. It is the alignment of rights, resources, responsibilities and outcomes around the human and living planet.

☼

Principle

◎

Task

⚙

Decision

✦

Action

▣

Evidence

✓

Balance

The working formula of the book is that every idea must come to a verifiable change in balance, otherwise it remains a slogan.

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

03

What is included in the master document

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

01

Mission, the human being, 16 KON Principles and a Covenant of 19 articles

02

Planetary Lotus, KRISTALL741 and the 13×20 matrix

03

Seven levels of transition from principle to balance

04

19 New World Order destinations and 19 related balances

05

Execution architecture: EQUILIBRIUM, SFERA, ECO-PPA, SPECZASHCHITA

06

Pilots, forms, road map and reliability map

The internal discipline of the document: to separate the inspiring image, design decisions and verifiable facts.

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

04

The Covenant of One Heaven — 19 articles

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

01

The Fate of Free People

02

Inviolability

03

The World as a Way of Action

04

Freedom of conscience and participation

05

Children and future generations

06

Health and independence

07

Living Earth

08

Water and food

09

Knowledge and education

10

Science and research

11

Work and Economics

12

Energy and responsibility

13

Finance as a means

14

Cooperation and support

15

Culture and memory

16

Law and administration

17

Data and personal freedom

18

Related Balance Sheets

19

Continuity of the future

The purpose of the Covenant is not to replace the right, but to set a high ethical framework for the design of solutions.

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

05

19 related balances — result management language

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

Life and Nature

01

Demography

02

Biosphere

03

Water

04

Health

05

Generations

Resources and production

06

Energy

07

Food

08

Materials

09

Infrastructure

10

Work

Knowledge and technology

11

Knowledge

12

Science

13

Technology

14

Culture

15

Space

Institutions and trust

16

Finance

17

Security

18

Management

19

Cooperation

Each balance receives a passport: the object of registration, responsible, metrics, data source, frequency and acceptance criteria.

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

06

Seven Levels: From Meaning to Measurement

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

1

Meaning

Why people need a solution

2

Right

What is allowed and protected

3

Object

What we are considering

4

Consent

Who takes responsibility

5

Action

What is launched on the ground

6

Evidence

What evidence supports the fact

7

Balance

What has changed in the system

Important limitation: this is the author's information and management model; it is not declared compliance with ISO/OSI without a separate certification check.

Such an honest framework strengthens the document: inspiration remains high, and the practical part becomes verifiable.

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

07

Implementation architecture

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

EQUILIBRIUM

surveillance, control, early warning

SFERA

portal, general map of meanings and projects

ECO-PPA

resources, contractual contours, confirmation of the result

SPECZASHCHITA

execution, sites, work safety

One control cycle: observation → Design → resource support → execution → check → Balance update.

The system is needed not for paper control, but for connecting solutions with real life: health, water, energy, labor, territory and trust.

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

08

KRISTALL741 and measurement framework 260

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

3×19×13

KRISTALL741: three Spheres, 19 areas, 13 node fields

13×20

260 measuring positions for certification and comparison

19×19

coherence of balances: one project changes several contours

Objective

object

Participants

resources

Data

metrics

Risks

Law

Finance

Timeline

evidence

acceptance

Update

The meaning of matrices is not to complicate the text, but to make each initiative have a full description and measurable result.

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

09

19 New World Order

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

People and Demography

Health and rehabilitation

Water and water balance

Living soil and food

Energy and autonomous generation

Materials of the New Order

Education and knowledge

Science and GRID

Work and family income

Entrepreneurship and cooperation

Finance and funds

Infrastructure and utilities

Transport of the Future

Culture and memory

Security and peace

State Constructor

Biocenoses and climate

Space development

Future generations

The rule of connectivity: the direction does not live separately. It should show an impact on at least three balances and one human program.

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

10

Five pilots of the first cycle

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

1

Second Breath

rehabilitation, prosthetics, health, independence

2

Water and water balance

accounting of sources, quality, consumption, recovery

3

Living soil and food

biodynamics, fertility, local food safety

4

City of Knowledge and Cooperation

education, work, entrepreneurship, strong communities

5

The ideal document flow

forms, balances, evidence, verification of decisions

Each pilot is accepted not by presentation, but by a set of proofs: passport, pre/after data, responsible, risk list and scaling decision.

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

11

Road map for 365 days

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

0–30 days

single edition, balance sheets passports, source map

31–90 days

pilot package, data register, appointment of responsible

91–180 days

first measurements, adjustments, evidentiary acceptance

181–365 days

scaling, external validation, white paper update

Management rhythm: weekly fact-finding, monthly update of passports, quarterly check of balance sheet coherence.

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

12

Validation Map: Trust Through Verification

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

Source

Where the position is taken from

Status

fact, hypothesis, project solution

Data

which confirms the change

Risk

which can distort the result

Decision

Accept, Rework, Stop

Unconditional reasons for pause: harm to a person, substitution of facts, conflict of interest, legal uncertainty, inability to verify the result.

A strong system is not afraid of limitations. It shows in advance where inspiration ends and responsibility begins.

WHITE PAPER OF SHARED DESTINY

13

Material set and following assemblies

Principle → Problem → Solution → Action → Proof → Balance Change

White Paper

master document, 19 chapters, annexes, register of previous works

Presentation

visual version for addressees and work meetings

Image

The cover and symbolic map of the One Destiny

Formularies

Passports of balance sheets, pilots, solutions and sources

Next step

separate packages for 19 destinations and pilots

Important: the register of previous works is a list for inclusion and reconciliation. Past packet files are not automatically embedded in the current book.

Published files

Strategy · Full published text

White Paper of Destiny: Rebirth

Source Status: Primary Document

A master document on the verifiable restoration of the ability of a person, community, culture, territory, ecosystem or institution to live, learn, create and pass on what is valuable.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/belaya-kniga-sudby-vozrozhdenie

Open on the site

• free choice memory • vitality recovery

Version 1.0 | Project edition | 30 August 2026

Status and reading rules

The main definition. The fate in this document is not a prediction or a predetermined outcome. It is a documented trajectory of conditions, free decisions, actions, consequences, feedback and new opportunities.

Resurgence. A verifiable restoration of an individual, community, culture, territory, ecosystem, or institution’s ability to live, learn, create, collaborate, and pass value on.

  • Symbolic systems serve navigation, culture, and interpretation; they are not a diagnosis, a prognosis, or the basis for a high-value decision.
  • The 16 KON Principles are presented as a modern philosophical and ethical framework, not as scientifically proven physical laws or mandatory religious dogma.
  • Indicators describe the environment, capabilities, and outcomes; human dignity is not ranked and does not depend on the profile, code, or score.
  • Numbers 344, 16, 19, 13, 3, 5, 22, 260 and 741 They belong to different registers. Matching power doesn't mean matching meaning.
  • Critical decisions retain human authority, the right to explanation, correction, and appeal.

Book Map

PartSectionResult
IDefinitionsFate, Rebirth, Legacy and Limits of Application
IIFoundation16 KON Principles and the Ethical Admissibility of Action
IIIPlanetary LotusThree Flowers, 19 Contours, 13 Balance and BAL‑741
IVRelated SystemsORION22:22, SRCh 19/260, Book of Kins 20×13, FIELD‑741
VThought FlowFrom signal and origin to solution, effect and memory
VIBuilding WorksFull registry of all 344 existing files and manifest of the new release
VIIManagementRights, roles, road map, readiness criteria

Summary for decisions

The White Paper of Destiny brings philosophical, cultural, scientific, engineering, environmental, financial and management works together into a single verifiable memory. The baseline snapshot includes all 344 files, without sampling: 159 DOCX, 164 PPTX, 19 PDF and 2 XLSX. Each object retains its title, format, path, provenance and version.

IndicatorValueMonitoring
Full body344 file344 unique paths and 344 unique Library ID
The main pairs138 DOCX↔PPTX135 High confidence; 3 Requires manual inspection
Thematic families12All 344 records received one main category
Current issueDOCX + PPTX + PNG 9:16New artifacts shown separately and do not change base account 344
  • Turn the archive from a set of files into a managed legacy with rights, versions, and origins.
  • Disseminate a worldview, a symbol, a hypothesis, a testimony and a verifiable statement.
  • Linking man, civilization, and planet through subject contours, balances, and proven effects.
  • To form a pilot in which the benefit, risk, external effect and recovery are visible before scaling.

Decision. Approve version 1.0 as a master frame, fix the basic register of 344 works and launch certification of the priority pilot portfolio.

1. Fate and Rebirth: An Open Trajectory

ConceptWorking definitionInvalid interpretation
FateAn open trajectory of conditions, choices, randomness, relationships, actions, consequences, and learning.A sentence, prophecy, or an automatically calculated human role.
RebirthRestoration of lost ability to live, create, cooperate and continuity, confirmed by the observed result.Guaranteed miracle or promise of result without criteria.
HeritageMaterial or intangible result with the carrier, origin, rights, context and value of the transmission.An anonymous set of meanings without responsibility or permission.
EvidenceSource, method and procedure of verification sufficient for a specific approval and decision.The authority of a name, symbol, or numerical coincidence is in itself.
Recovery effectMeasurable improvement relative to baseline without hidden harm transfer.The growth of one indicator at the cost of exclusion of people or degradation of nature.

The main formula

Trajectory. Memory → understanding → Free choice → Action → Consequence → check → Recovery → new heritage.

  • Conditions set the stage, but do not cancel the possibility of choice and support.
  • The scenario shows several options and uncertainty, and does not give a forecast for fate.
  • The decision has the owner, the authority, the basis, the term and the criterion of revision.
  • The result is returned to memory only together with sources, limitations and lessons.

2. 16 KON Principles — The Foundation of the Universe

Status. The section retains the author's title "The Foundation of the Universe", but uses the methodologically refined edition EQUILIBRIUM. Cohns work as philosophical and ethical questions to choice and consequences; they do not pass off as empirically proven laws of physics.

CodeKONMeaningVerified sign
K01Continuity and improvementInherited biological, cultural, family, and institutional conditions become the material for preservation, verification, and improvement, rather than mechanical repetition.Share of decisions based on lessons learned; availability of knowledge register; reduction of repeatability of errors.
K02Will and moral choiceWill is the ability to hold on to a chosen direction by relating momentum, values, and consequences; it is not equal to rigidity and does not justify the suppression of another.Fulfillment of voluntary commitments; stability of focus; ability to adjust the course without abandoning the goal.
K03The identity of the part and the wholeMan is included in the larger systems; the similarity of part and whole is used as a metaphor for systemic connectedness, not as proof of complete identity.Number of relationships taken into account; reduction of unforeseen external effects; completeness of the system map.
K04CreationCreation is the production of value that supports life, dignity, knowledge, beauty, trust and the ability of systems to develop.Proven utility; satisfaction of recipients; no or compensation for harm.
K05Similarity and WednesdayThe environment is shaped by shared interests, attitudes, choices, algorithms, social conditions, and available opportunities, rather than mystical attraction.A variety of reliable contacts; the quality of information sources; the level of psychological safety.
K06Resonance and TransformationInformation elicits a response; maturity is not to transmit a destructive impulse further, but to transform it into understanding, a boundary, or a constructive action.Reduction of escalations; speed of recovery from conflicts; share of conflicts with agreed solution.
K07Long horizon of lifeThe practical core is to consider consequences beyond short-term benefits and the interests of future generations; reincarnation is labeled as a worldview, not a scientifically established idea.Share of long-term indicators; intergenerational equity; risk reversibility.
K08Causality and responsibilityKarma is interpreted as an ethical-philosophical image of causes and consequences; a person is responsible for his own contribution, but complex events have many causes.Quality of analysis of the root causes; implementation of corrective measures; reduction of repeated incidents.
K09Conformity to purposePurpose is the dynamic correspondence of abilities, values, needs of the world and mature responsibility, and not a predetermined fate.Growth of skills; sustainable participation; confirmed social value of activities.
K10World of Thought and AttentionThoughts affect perception, emotions, and behavior, but do not materialize events directly; attention requires thought testing and choice of action.Reduced cognitive bias; quality of decisions; compliance with the recovery regime and specialist assistance.
K11Magnetism and Responsible LeadershipInfluence arises from trust, competence, status, communication and association of people; strong influence increases responsibility and does not give the right to manage without consent.Trust; transparency of decisions; distribution of leadership; mechanisms of feedback and withdrawal of authority.
K12Conservation and conversion of resourcesThe physical law of conservation of energy is not directly transferred to emotions, money and information; management takes into account sources, losses, conversion and restoration of resources.Resource intensity of the result; recovery rate; waste reduction; absence of chronic burnout.
K13Exchange and reciprocityViable systems exist through the exchange of matter, energy, information, labor, care and trust; fair exchange takes into account contribution, need, voluntariness and asymmetry of power.Balance of contributions and benefits; accessibility; low level of conflicts on the terms of exchange.
K14Gratitude and LearningGratitude helps to notice support and meaning, but does not require to call harm good and is compatible with boundaries and the demand for justice.Culture of recognition; retention of participants; speed of learning; implementation of restorative measures.
K15Impact and social contributionGiving is the voluntary direction of time, knowledge, means or concern for the development of others and the common good without guarantee of personal reward.Confirmed effect; transparency; growth of independence; sustainability of participation.
K16Replace, upgrade and upgradeLiving systems retain their identity through renewal; transition requires distinguishing between what to complete, what to preserve, and what to experience.Speed of safe adaptation; share of completed commitments; safety of critical functions.

The Cycle of the 16 KON Principles. Awareness → choice → action → consequence → feedback → improvement

  • The OH is not assigned to a person as a type or rank.
  • Historical names are retained as alternative labels and do not hide the modern edition.
  • Any practical conclusion should have a criterion, source and possibility of refutation or revision.

3. Planetary Lotus: Three Flowers of Life

Figure 1. Planetary lotus. A visual metaphor of three levels; an exact model — 3 Levels × 19 Subject Contours × 13 Balance pair = 741 Cell.

Geometry. Each flower contains exactly 19 nodes: one core, six nodes of the inner contour and twelve nodes of the outer contour. The same structure is repeated on three levels; it is a map of connectivity, not a ranking.

FlowerCompliance with BALThe main question
PersonS1 - Object-territorialWhat happens to a person, family, organization, facility, municipality, or pilot?
CivilizationS2 - industry and nationalHow do industries, regions, federal programs and cross-industry complexes agree?
PlanetS3 - interstate and globalHow are cross-border systems, shared resources, externalities and future generations taken into account?

19 subject contours — "19 related balances"

Historical Name "19 Balance Sheets are retained as the name of the project. In the normative core C01–C19 are subject contours: they answer the question of what is reproduced and controlled. The balance is set by thirteen pairs B01–B13, applicable to each circuit.

CodeContourVerified result
C01People and demographySustainable reproduction of a healthy and prosperous population.
C02Health and rehabilitationReducing the burden of disease and restoring human function.
C03Education and talentsCompetencies are in line with development objectives, talents are revealed.
C04Culture and heritageContinuity of cultural memory in creative renewal.
C05Science and technologyIndependently confirmed technologies are brought to use.
C06Industry and materialsReliable complete production chains.
C07EnergyContinuous, affordable and resource-efficient energy.
C08Food and agricultureAffordable safe food without depleting the natural base.
C09Water and hydrosphereReliable water supply within the pool’s reproducibility.
C10Ecology and biodiversityEconomic activity remains within the permissible load.
C11Territory, cities and resettlementA connected system of secure settlements with equal basic access.
C12Transport and logisticsAvailable continuous corridors with a predictable delivery time.
C13Digital environment, data and AIA compatible, sovereign and secure digital environment under human control.
C14Finance and investmentReproduction financing at an acceptable price and risk.
C15Labour, entrepreneurship and cooperationProductive work, fair results and sustainable cooperation.
C16Governance, law and trustPredictable, responsible and contested management.
C17Safety and ContinuityAcceptable risk and restoration of critical functions within a given period.
C18International cooperationEqual diversified projects with mutual benefit.
C19The Long HorizonThe choice of future generations and readiness for big challenges are preserved.

13 Balance Pairs

CodePaired BalanceCodePaired Balance
B01Security - DevelopmentB02Man is a state
B03Center - regionsB04Nature — technosphere
B05Sovereignty — OpennessB06Present - future
B07Efficiency — fairnessB08Labor - Capital
B09Competition - cooperationB10Innovation - reliability
B11Digital efficiency — human sovereigntyB12Tradition - Update
B13Agglomeration growth - spatial connectivity

4. Two spaces 741 - different semantics

There are two confirmed power models 741 in the heritage. They cannot be combined by arithmetical coincidence. The white paper preserves individual namespaces and binds them only to versionable displays.

RegisterFormulaWhat AddressesCanonical code
BAL‑74119 Contours × 13 Balance pair × 3 LevelsWhat is controlled, between which poles the result is held and where the effect is manifested.BAL:C01:B01:S1
FIELD‑74113 Field Families × 19 Base Nodes × 3 StatusWhich field family, base node and mode of operation - diagnosis, coordination or development.FIELD:S01:N01:D

Critical difference. There is no separate approved list in the sources "13 Phases" for the model 741. Thirteen tones of Keene remain a symbolic layer 20×13 They do not replace 13 Balance pair BAL‑741.

State of Evidence BAL-741

CodeStateMeaning
Z0OriginalFixed baseline prior to intervention.
Z1PrognosticScenario or forecast state with assumptions and uncertainty.
Z2After the pilotThe result is after a limited pilot; scaling has not yet been confirmed.
Z3Independently ConfirmedThe result was independently verified sources, method and effect.
Z4OperatingSustainable operational status with monitoring and possibility of revision.

FIELD-741: three modes

CodeModeThe Source Formula
DDiagnosticsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T
KCoordinationK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R
RDevelopmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V

13 Field families

CodeFamilyFunction
S01Unity and ManagementIntegrity, subjectivity and coherent management.
S02Meaning and ValuesPurpose, values, identity and social meaning.
S03Time and CyclesRhythms, stages, timelines, scenarios and cycles of development.
S04Energy and resourcesResource security, energy and material flows.
S05Information and dataData, knowledge, digital footprints and analytics.
S06Man and ConsciousnessHuman potential, competence, perception and learning.
S07Cooperation and NetworksConnectivity, trust, contracts and networking.
S08Balance and sustainabilityEquilibrium, Sustainability, Adaptation and Recovery.
S09Evolution and innovationUpdating, experiments, R&D and scaling.
S10Creation and productionValue creation, production, services and execution infrastructure.
S11Navigation and strategyPriorities, routes, portfolios and strategic choices.
S12Life and EcologyBiocenoses, environment, ecosystem health and natural reproducibility.
S13Security and integrityThreats, protection, continuity and control of critical states.

19 base nodes FIELD

CodeNodeCodeNodeCodeNode
N01SubjectN02GoalN03Border
N04ResourceN05SignalN06Knowledge
N07DecisionN08ActionN09Feedback
N10RiskN11TrustN12Cooperation
N13InfrastructureN14StandardN15Finance
N16WorkforceN17TechnologyN18Environment
N19Result

4.1. How the cell works BAL‑741

The cell BAL-741 is neither a number nor a final score. This is a certified management situation in which the subject contour C, the pair balance B and the level S are simultaneously fixed. Any state of Z0-Z4 remains the same cell version.

Passport fieldWhat is fixedQuality control
AddressType code BAL:C09:B04:S3 and C/B/S schematic version.The address is constant; the code is not re-used for a new meaning.
Result subjectWhat is the reproducible state C01-C19 should change.The result is formulated observable and is not limited to the release of the product.
Paired BalanceWhich two poles B01 to B13 should be held together?Distortions in both directions and unacceptable boundaries are described.
LevelS1, S2 or S3; territory and affected systems.Primary, national and global effects are not mixed.
Base line Z0Fact before intervention, date, territory, method, and uncertainty.The source is reproducible; units and period are comparable.
Purpose and thresholdDesired change, duration, minimum acceptable result and stop condition.The threshold is not retroactively entered after the data has been received.
IndicatorsSet IND: formula, unit, frequency, owner and source.The indicator measures the environment or the result, but not the dignity of a person.
ScriptsThere are at least two alternatives and the option not to act.Specifies assumptions, sensitivity and range of uncertainty.
Resources and obligationsFinance, labor, materials, energy, data, contracts and reserves.Sources of resources are confirmed; hidden liabilities are disclosed.
Rights and protectionLegal basis, consent, access, data minimization, veto and appeal.A high-risk solution is not automated without human authority.
Effect and external consequencesBenefit, risk, transfer of harm between contours, territories and generations.The entire set of affected B pairs is checked, not just the main indicator.
Origin and memorySources, authors, actions, versions, evidence, and journal changes.The provenance chain is played from the signal to the archive package.

Expanded example: water, soil and swimming pool

Address. BAL:C09:B04:S3 — "Water and Hydrosphere" × "Nature - Technosphere" × "Interstate and Global Levels". The example is applicable to the transboundary program of restoration of the river, soils and biocenoses, including cooperation between Russia and India.

ComponentContents of the example
Initial state Z0Map of water quality and bottom sediments; contaminated soils; seasonal runoff; biodiversity; population access to safe water; sources of discharges and waste.
GoalReduce pollution and health risks, restore the reproducibility of the basin and soils, without creating inaccessible infrastructure or a new critical dependence.
Key indicatorsConcentrations of priority substances; proportion of treated effluents; area of restored soils and coastal zones; biodiversity index; reliability of water supply; life cycle cost; carbon and material intensity.
Balance B04The environmental threshold is not replaced by a development ban; the technological solution is not scaled up without an assessment of energy, materials, waste, maintainability and residual environmental risk.
Additional PairsB01 security-development; B05 sovereignty-openness; B06 present-future; B07 efficiency-justice; B10 innovation-reliability.
ScriptsA: Modernization of centralized facilities; B: distributed natural and technical modules; C: Combined system with pollution prevention priority D: Delay with enhanced monitoring
Pilot Z2Limited pool area, predefined thresholds, open measurement protocol, independent laboratory and emergency recovery plan.
Solution Z3→Z4Scaling is allowed after independent verification of the effect, the cost of the life cycle, the rights of local communities, off-season sustainability and the absence of downstream harm transfer.

Crosswalk BAL↔FIELD

BAL and FIELD are linked by separate matching objects. The display does not state the identity of the axes: it explains which nodes and modes FIELD support the specific problem BAL.

Display fieldExampleRule
mapping_idMAP‑BAL‑FIELD‑0001Permanent identifier; new bases create new version.
sourceBAL:C09:B04:S3Always specify the version of the original scheme.
targetFIELD:S12:N18:D + FIELD:S05:N06:K + FIELD:S10:N17:RThe composite correspondence stores all components and the formula of the combination.
relationcomposite / relatedclose cannot be automatically raised to exact.
conditionPool, period, type of pollution, units and legal regimeWithout a condition, compliance does not apply automatically.
evidenceProtocol, source, test examples and round-trip verificationThe author, independent reviewer and date are retained.
statusDraft → Candidate → Approved → Deprecated → RetiredThe published version is unchanged; the replacement is issued replacedBy.

E0-E4

ClassPermissible contentWhat is allowed
E0 — symbol / author positionMetaphor, worldview, artistic or philosophical interpretation.Publication with explicit labeling; no basis for an operational solution.
E1 - hypothesisA falsifiable assumption that explains observation or suggests a mechanism.Test research and design; it is forbidden to give out for a confirmed effect.
E2 - Internal evidenceObservation, calculation or pilot with documented method, but without independent verification.Limited pilot with protection and monitoring.
E3 - independent confirmationThe data, method and result are independently verified; the limitations are disclosed.Controlled scaling decision.
E4 - Reproducible practiceThe result is stable in several contexts, has operational monitoring and revision procedure.Wide application within the confirmed scope of applicability.

Three Pilots in Three Flowers

FlowerPilotIntegrated workVerified exit
Person / S1Personal and family trajectory of opportunitiesSRCh 19/260; SFERA; social cooperation; development fundsPassport of conditions and access to opportunities without a personality rating; support plan with consent and appeal.
Civilization / S2Food Security and an Integrated Farm Covering the Full Production CycleBiocenosis; full cycle farm; ECO-PPA; funds and banks; computing GRIDBalance nutrition, water, soil, energy, logistics, finance and employment with measurable restoration of the natural base.
Planet / S3Russia-India: water, soil and biocenosesGanges; hydrosphere; land use; Planetary balance; Heritage ArchiveCross-border pilot with comparable data, open source, independent verification and preservation of cultural context.

5. Related systems: ORION, SRCh and the Book of Kins

ORION22:22 — common management language

ORION 22 independent classification axes and 22 Verified results. It does not replace the original classifiers, but combines values, versions, rights, origins, and conversion rules.

LayerCodesQuestionsResults
MeaningVAL • NEE • GOA • BENValue / Principle • Necessity/contradiction • Purpose/desired effect • Recipient/affected systemValue tracing • Register of normalized needs • Passport of target • Map of effect recipients
KnowledgeDOM • OBJ • AGT • GEO • TIMSubject area • Object/Essence Type • Subject / role • Space / Territory • Time / CycleDomain Routing • Canonical Object Type • Responsibility Matrix • Territorial Compatibility • Time Definition
DecisionSIT • IND • SCN • RSK • DECSituation / observed condition • Indicator / measure • Scenario / alternative • Risk / uncertainty • Solution / impact toolConfirmed state snapshot • Comparative index • Set of comparable alternatives • Risk map • Machine readable decision act
ActionCAP • PRC • INI • RES • DELAbility / Function • Process / Cycle Stage • Initiative / Program / Project • Resource / Asset • Product / Service / SupplyCapacity Map • Through-process • Linked portfolio initiatives • Checked resource balance • Accepted supply
MemoryREC • PRV • RGTRecord / Document / Artifact • Origin / Proof • Rights / Access / StorageFull archival package • Chain of origin • Rights and storage policy

SRCh 19/260 — measuring the development environment

Formula. 13 Standards × 14 indicators + 6 Standards × 13 indicators = 260. The system measures conditions, capabilities and confirmed results, but not human dignity.

CodeStandardPurpose
СРЧ-01Dignity and rightsProvides protection of the dignity, rights, freedoms and subjectivity of a person.
СРЧ-02Physical healthProvides health preservation, prevention, treatment and recovery.
СРЧ-03Psychological well-beingProvides mental stability, support and quality of inner life.
СРЧ-04SecurityProvides protection against physical, social, technological and digital threats.
СРЧ-05Healthy environmentProvides access to environmentally friendly living conditions.
СРЧ-06Family and childhoodIt ensures the well-being of the family, parenthood and the full development of the child.
СРЧ-07Lifelong educationProvides continuous development of knowledge, thinking and competencies.
СРЧ-08Culture and worldviewProvides cultural identity, ethical maturity and openness to diversity.
СРЧ-09Work and professional implementationProvides decent work, skill and professional self-realization.
СРЧ-10Economic independenceProvides sustainable income, financial literacy and resource management.
СРЧ-11Housing and living spaceProvides an affordable, safe and developing living space.
СРЧ-12Digital subjectivityProvides the rights, security, access and independence of the Human in the digital environment.
СРЧ-13Creativity and innovationProvides the ability to create, research and implement socially useful solutions.
СРЧ-14Social ties and solidarityProvides affiliation, trust, mutual assistance and participation in communities.
СРЧ-15Civic participationProvides informed participation in public life and decision-making.
СРЧ-16Environmental responsibilityEnsures responsible environmental management and ecosystem restoration.
СРЧ-17Time and life trajectory managementProvides a balance of roles, time, goals and transitions between life stages.
СРЧ-18Meaning and ServiceProvides meaningful life, value certainty and contribution to the common good.
СРЧ-19Legacy and continuityIt ensures the transfer of knowledge, culture, experience and results to the next generations.

Book of Kins — a symbolic layer of 20×13

The Book of Kins uses 20 archetypes and 13 tones to create 260 symbolic coordinates. This is a language of cultural memory and interpretation, not an SRCh measurement scale or a prediction of personality.

Archetypes 01–20Tones 01–13
01 Dragon • 02 Wind • 03 Night • 04 Seed • 05 Serpent • 06 Bridge of Worlds • 07 Hand • 08 Star • 09 Luna • 10 Dog01 Magnetic • 02 Lunar • 03 Electric • 04 Self-Subsisting • 05 Overturning • 06 Rhythmic • 07 Resonance
11 Monkey • 12 Man • 13 Sky Wanderer • 14 Magician • 15 Eagle • 16 Warrior • 17 Land • 18 Mirror • 19 Storm • 20 Sun08 Galactica • 09 Solar • 10 Planetary • 11 Spectral • 12 Crystalline • 13 Space

6. Thought Flow

Flow. Work or signal → Identification → origin → Law → context → Type of approval → Hypothesis and scenario → human solution → Action → effect → independent verification → new version of memory.

StepNodeActionCoordinates
1SignalRecord the source, time, format and boundaries of the observation.REC • PRV • TIM
2ContextIdentify the object, territory, interested parties and rights.OBJ • GEO • AGT • RGT
3HypothesisSeparate the verifiable statement from the symbol, opinion, and evidence.DOM • IND • PRV
4ScenarioCompare at least two alternatives, risks and externalities.SCN • RSK • B01–B13
5CredentialsAppoint the owner of the decision, the basis, the term and the veto right.DEC • AGT • RGT
6ActionLink process, resources, initiative and acceptance criteria.CAP • PRC • INI • RES • DEL
7VerificationCompare the fact with the baseline and confirm the result independently.IND • PRV • Z0–Z4
8MemoryCreate an immutable version, a change log, and lessons.REC • PRV • RGT
  • AI can recognize text, translate, search for duplicates, extract metadata, and offer connections.
  • AI does not establish authorship, legal status, truth of worldview, human value or final interpretation of a sensitive heritage.
  • Any automatic recommendation should be explained, verified and canceled by an authorized person.

Dynamic Model of the Biosphere

Condition. Condition = Stock + Reproduction − Consumption − Degradation + Restoration

For each indicator, the unit of measurement, territory, period, source, history of changes and the verification criterion are recorded. Improvement is not considered confirmed if it transfers damage to another circuit, level or future generation.

7. All our works: a single body

Completeness. The application includes all 344 records of the original image without a sample. Control: 344 unique paths, 344 unique Library ID, zero missing entries.

FormatNumberShare
PPTX16447.67%
DOCX15946.22%
PDF195.52%
XLSX20.58%

12 Thematic families

CodeFamilyTotalDOCXPPTXPDFXLSX
F01Metasystems, classifiers and ORION41201920
F02Public administration, security and doctrines36171720
F03Economics, Balance Sheets, Finance, Funds and PPA39191811
F04Industry, materials, construction and transport48212160
F05Digital Systems, Data, AI and Computing137600
F06Ecology, biocenoses and natural systems28131401
F07Social cooperation, people and institutions21111000
F08Culture, Civilization and Meanings27111600
F09Heritage, Archives, Memory and Media26131210
F10Science, Mathematics, Physics and Universal Laws2010910
F11Territories, international integration and development projects31121450
F12Service, targeted and unrecognized materials145810

Pairs, Versions and Doubles

MonitoringResultEditorial Action
The main pairs DOCX↔PPTX138Link a common job identifier and view view.
High confidence135Accept automatically with selective audit.
Manual check of pairs3Confirm by editorial decision.
Odds DOCX / PPTX21 / 26Check the completeness and independent archival identity.
Copies or Versions Groups6Save options, select canonical edit, do not delete history.
Byte duplicatesnot approvedContent checksums will be required for confirmation.

Passport of each work

  • Permanent identifier BKS-0001...BKS-0344; numbering has no rank meaning.
  • Original and normalized name, format, path, version, date, language and completeness.
  • Authorship, copyright holder, license, access restrictions and heritage sensitivity.
  • Connections with the 16 KON Principles, C01–C19, B01–B13, S1–S3, ORION22:22 and applied programmes.
  • Evidence class, sources, criticism, journal changes and editorial board decision.

Manifest of the current issue

Release codeArtifactPurposeRelation to base account
BKS‑R1‑DOCБелая_Книга_Судьбы_Мастер-документ_Возрождение.docxFull master document and register of 344 worksNew release artifact; not included retroactively in image 344
BKS‑R1‑PPTБелая_​Книга_​Судьбы_​Стратегическая_​презентация.pptxStrategic presentation and case mapNew Release Artefact
BKS‑R1‑IMGBelaya_Kniga_Sudby_9x16.pngVertical Image 9:16, 1080×1920Visual release asset

8. Governance, rights and security

RoleResponsibilityIndependent Authority
White Book CouncilApproves definitions, boundaries, versions, and priorities.Stops publication if basic principles are violated.
Editorial BoardPassports work, communications, options and canonical headlines.Returns the object for revision and fixes the disagreement.
Human Rights and Ethics CouncilVerifies dignity, non-discrimination, consent and sensitive heritage.It has a veto on high-risk use.
Scientific and Methodological CouncilIt separates proof, hypothesis, evidence and symbol.Requires independent verification and adjustment of the approval status.
Owners of contoursIndicators, risks, programs and results C01-C19.Reject unconfirmed or unacceptable cells BAL.
Archive and KeepersSave versions, rights, access, origin and long-term readability.Blocks loss of context and unauthorized disclosure.
Independent auditVerifies completeness, security, data quality and effects.Issued by GO / REDESIGN / HOLD / STOP.

Red Lines

  • It is impossible to calculate the "destiny" of a person, assign him a role or limit rights by a symbolic coordinate.
  • Human dignity, social worth or the right to help cannot be ranked.
  • You can’t automatically make decisions about credit, labor, medicine, education, justice, or access to White Paper services.
  • You can not give the author’s model, philosophical metaphor or number for a scientific fact without specifying the status and source.
  • It is impossible to publish a sensitive heritage without the rights, consent and assessment of possible harm.

Passport Solutions

FieldMandatory content
Purpose and RecipientWhat effect, for whom or for what, in what contour and at what level.
BasisSources, version of the concept, right and authority.
BalanceWhich pairs B01 to B13 are affected; where harm transfer is possible.
AlternativesAt least two comparable scenarios, including the option not to act.
Risk and protectionProbability, exposure, residual risk, stopping and repair mechanisms.
IndicatorBaseline, formula, unit, period, source and revision threshold.
DecisionOwner, date, term, terms, veto and right of appeal.
MemoryResult, proof, deviations, lessons and a new version.

Passport work cycle

  1. Prior to launch: Confirm target, power, rights, Z0 base line, alternatives and stop conditions.
  2. During the pilot: keep a log of decisions, deviations, data sources, incidents, and externalities.
  3. At the control point: compare Z1/Z2 the Z0, Check for damage transfer B01–B13 Independence of Confirmation.
  4. After completion: Record the actual result, the cost of the full cycle, lessons and recovery commitments.
  5. Re-use: open a new version of the passport; the previous solution is not automatically transferred to a different context.

Stop the rule. Absence of source, authority, baseline, right of appeal or redress mechanism means HOLD; unacceptable risk to dignity, rights or nature means STOP.

9. Road map of the Renaissance

TimeframeGatewayResultExit criterion
0–2 monthsG0–G1Mandate and fixation of the hullApprove definitions, roles, basic register 344 and red lines.
2–6 monthsG2–G3Passports and rightsPassport priority 50 works; audit rights and sensitivity.
4–9 monthsG4MetareisterDeploy identifiers, versions, provenance, directory, and crosswalk.
6–15 monthsG5Three pilotsHuman/community, civilizational contour and natural object; basic lines and BAL passports.
12–24 monthsG6–G7Independent verificationCompare effect, risk and external effects; take GO/REDESIGN/HOLD/STOP.
24–36 monthsG8Federation and inheritanceConnect autonomous nodes, provide long-term storage and public reporting.

Decision criteria

  1. GO - the use is confirmed, the rights are respected, the risk is acceptable, the result is reproduced.
  2. REDESIGN - The target is maintained, but the architecture, metric, process, or protection requires a change.
  3. HOLD - Evidence, rights, data or resources are not enough; launch is suspended.
  4. STOP - Unacceptable harm, violation of dignity, rights, safety or irreversibility of risk is detected.

Next step. Approve the basic picture of 344 works, appoint the owners of the register and choose the first 50 works for certification and three pilots to check the architecture.

10. Sources and status of allegations

The White Paper architecture is a project synthesis. International documents are used as reference models for rights, metadata, interoperability, origin and measurement; references do not imply certification or formal approval of the project by the relevant organizations.

1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Dignity, equality, freedom and legal personality. Official source

2. OHCHR Human Rights Indicators. Method of measuring the implementation of human rights standards without any knowledge of the dignity of the score. Official source

3. ISO/IEC 11179-1:2023. The conceptual basis of the metadata registry. Official source

4. ISO/IEC 11179-3:2023. Identify, define, record and display data elements. Official source

5. W3C SKOS. Schemes of concepts and typed interscheme correspondences. Official source

6. W3C DCAT 3. Federal catalog of data sets, services and versions. Official source

7. W3C PROV-O. Origin of entities, actions and responsibility. Official source

8. SDMX 3.1. Structured indicators, code lists and statistical data exchange. Official source

9. FAIR Guiding Principles. Availability, accessibility, compatibility and reuse of digital objects. Official source

10. UN SEEA Ecosystem Accounting. Relationship of ecosystems, services, assets and economic activities. Official source

Internal sources

  • 16 конов.docx — a historical list, retained only as the original edition.
  • 16_конов_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx — a methodologically refined edition of the 16 KON Principles.
  • Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Unifikatsiya_741.docx — BAL‑741: 19 Contours × 13 Steam × 3 Levels.
  • Register_741_Other Organiser741.docx — FIELD‑741: 13 Family × 19 Node × D/K/R.
  • Planetary_Balance_and_Balance_Biospheres_EG.docx — the dynamics of a natural object and requirements for indicators.
  • Human Development Standard SRCh 1.0 — 19 standards and 260 indicators of the environment.
  • Book of Kins. Archive for Preserving Humanity’s Heritage — a symbolic matrix of 20×13.
  • ORION22:22 - 22 axles and 22 testable results.

Annex A. Full register of all 344 works

Image of the original housing at 30 August 2026. All entries are included without a sample. Code BKS - assigned only for navigation in this edition and does not mean value, priority or authorship. Paths and names are saved from the registry.

№CodeNamePathFormatSam.Origin
1BKS-000116 конов.docx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/16 конов.docxDOCXF08Sourcebook
2BKS-000216_конов_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/16_конов_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF08Created
3BKS-000316_конов_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_презентация.pptx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/16_конов_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_презентация.pptxPPTXF08Created
4BKS-000417053bb5-09c0-44c7-98f9-0680ac4fdfc1.docx/Report 01 августа/17053bb5-09c0-44c7-98f9-0680ac4fdfc1.docxDOCXF12Sourcebook
5BKS-0005560b417c-9d70-46fe-b16c-ad67374aeb14.pdf/560b417c-9d70-46fe-b16c-ad67374aeb14.pdfPDFF12Sourcebook
6BKS-00065781f682-b846-4f41-ba8f-7b2d7a25b724.pptx/Report 01 августа/5781f682-b846-4f41-ba8f-7b2d7a25b724.pptxPPTXF12Sourcebook
7BKS-0007Analiz_balansov_Rossii_1995-2025.pptx/Балансы/Analiz_balansov_Rossii_1995-2025.pptxPPTXF03Created
8BKS-0008Analiz_natsionalnyh_balansov_Rossii_1995-2025.docx/Балансы/Analiz_natsionalnyh_balansov_Rossii_1995-2025.docxDOCXF03Created
9BKS-0009Arkhitektura_natsionalnoy_bezopasnosti_ECO-PPA.pptx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/Arkhitektura_natsionalnoy_bezopasnosti_ECO-PPA.pptxPPTXF02Created
10BKS-0010Balances_as_a_System_SUR.docx/Balances_as_a_System_SUR.docxDOCXF03Created
11BKS-0011Balances_as_Management_System_SUR.pptx/Balances_as_Management_System_SUR.pptxPPTXF03Created
12BKS-0012Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_Equilibrium_Sinhronizatsiya.docx/Балансы/Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_Equilibrium_Sinhronizatsiya.docxDOCXF03Created
13BKS-0013Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_Equilibrium_Sinhronizatsiya.pptx/Балансы/Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_Equilibrium_Sinhronizatsiya.pptxPPTXF03Created
14BKS-0014Balansy_Rossii_1896-2026_Akademiya_nauk.docx/Балансы/Balansy_Rossii_1896-2026_Akademiya_nauk.docxDOCXF03Created
15BKS-0015Balansy_Rossii_1896-2026_Akademiya_nauk.pptx/Балансы/Balansy_Rossii_1896-2026_Akademiya_nauk.pptxPPTXF03Created
16BKS-0016Belaya_kniga_kooperativa_SPECZASCHITA_v1.docx/Report 01 августа/Belaya_kniga_kooperativa_SPECZASCHITA_v1.docxDOCXF07Created
17BKS-0017Belaya_kniga_SPECZASCHITA_v1.pptx/Report 01 августа/Belaya_kniga_SPECZASCHITA_v1.pptxPPTXF12Created
18BKS-0018Biocenozy_ECO-PPA.pptx/SPECZASHCHITA report Госсовет/Biocenozy_ECO-PPA.pptxPPTXF02Created
19BKS-0019Chelovek_Kultura_i_mirovye_balansy.docx/Chelovek_Kultura_i_mirovye_balansy.docxDOCXF08Created
20BKS-0020Chelovek_Kultura_i_mirovye_balansy.pptx/Chelovek_Kultura_i_mirovye_balansy.pptxPPTXF08Created
21BKS-0021Dinamicheskaya_model_biosfery_Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema_Arkhiv_naslediya.docx/Dinamicheskaya_model_biosfery_Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema_Arkhiv_naslediya.docxDOCXF09Created
22BKS-0022Dinamicheskaya_model_biosfery_Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema_Arkhiv_naslediya.pptx/Dinamicheskaya_model_biosfery_Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema_Arkhiv_naslediya.pptxPPTXF09Created
23BKS-0023Doklad_SPECZASCHITA_Gossovet.docx/SPECZASHCHITA report Госсовет/Doklad_SPECZASCHITA_Gossovet.docxDOCXF02Created
24BKS-0024Doktrina_Pobedy_2026_2036.docx/Doktrina_Pobedy_2026_2036.docxDOCXF02Created
25BKS-0025ECO-PPA_001_Матрица_Календарь_Управление.xlsx/Agreement PPA/ECO-PPA_001_Матрица_Календарь_Управление.xlsxXLSXF03Created
26BKS-0026ECO-PPA_arkhitektura_natsionalnoy_bezopasnosti.docx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/ECO-PPA_arkhitektura_natsionalnoy_bezopasnosti.docxDOCXF02Created
27BKS-0027ECO-PPA_main_map_A0.pdf/ECO-PPA_main_map_A0.pdfPDFF03Created
28BKS-0028Edinaya_Nauka_Prirodnyh_Sistem.docx/Core Mathematics and Architecture ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Edinaya_Nauka_Prirodnyh_Sistem.docxDOCXF10Created
29BKS-0029Edinaya_Nauka_Prirodnyh_Sistem.pptx/Core Mathematics and Architecture ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Edinaya_Nauka_Prirodnyh_Sistem.pptxPPTXF10Created
30BKS-0030Ediny_stroitelny_portal_Kontseptsiya.docx/Ediny_stroitelny_portal_Kontseptsiya.docxDOCXF05Created
31BKS-0031Ediny_stroitelny_portal_Prezentatsiya.pptx/Ediny_stroitelny_portal_Prezentatsiya.pptxPPTXF05Created
32BKS-0032EQUILIBRIUM_10_smyslov_Vhozhdenie_v_Realnost.pptx/36/EQUILIBRIUM_10_smyslov_Vhozhdenie_v_Realnost.pptxPPTXF08Created
33BKS-0033EQUILIBRIUM_AI_self_assessment.docx/Core Mathematics and Architecture ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/EQUILIBRIUM_AI_self_assessment.docxDOCXF10Created
34BKS-0034GASMP_EQUILIBRIUM_Presentation.pptx/Кладовочка/GASMP_EQUILIBRIUM_Presentation.pptxPPTXF09Created
35BKS-0035GASMP_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docx/Кладовочка/GASMP_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docxDOCXF09Created
36BKS-0036GIDROSFERA_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docx/ORION 22:22/GIDROSFERA_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docxDOCXF01Created
37BKS-0037GIDROSFERA_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_prezentatsiya.pptx/ORION 22:22/GIDROSFERA_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_prezentatsiya.pptxPPTXF01Created
38BKS-0038Ideal_Document_Flow_SUR.docx/Ideal_Document_Flow_SUR.docxDOCXF01Created
39BKS-0039Ideal_Document_Flow_SUR.pptx/Ideal_Document_Flow_SUR.pptxPPTXF01Created
40BKS-0040Karta_validatsii_EQUILIBRIUM.docx/Social Кооперация/Karta_validatsii_EQUILIBRIUM.docxDOCXF07Created
41BKS-0041Karta_validatsii_SK42_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx/Social Кооперация/Karta_validatsii_SK42_EQUILIBRIUM.pptxPPTXF07Created
42BKS-0042Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_Chelovechestva.docx/Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_Chelovechestva.docxDOCXF09Created
43BKS-0043Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_Chelovechestva.pptx/Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_Chelovechestva.pptxPPTXF09Created
44BKS-0044Konsolidatsiya_stran_Prezentatsiya.pptx/Konsolidatsiya_stran_Prezentatsiya.pptxPPTXF11Created
45BKS-0045Konsolidatsiya_stran_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docx/Konsolidatsiya_stran_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docxDOCXF11Created
46BKS-0046Manifest_10_smyslov_EQILIBRIUM.docx/36/Manifest_10_smyslov_EQILIBRIUM.docxDOCXF08Created
47BKS-0047MERA_Standard_PPA_2017_RU_full_translation.docx/Agreement PPA/MERA_Standard_PPA_2017_RU_full_translation.docxDOCXF03Created
48BKS-0048Ministerstva_Uchrezhdeniya_Mezhotraslevoi_Balans_Smysly_2026.docx/Ministerstva_Uchrezhdeniya_Mezhotraslevoi_Balans_Smysly_2026.docxDOCXF03Created
49BKS-0049Ministerstva_Uchrezhdeniya_Mezhotraslevoi_Balans_Smysly_2026.pptx/Ministerstva_Uchrezhdeniya_Mezhotraslevoi_Balans_Smysly_2026.pptxPPTXF03Created
50BKS-0050My_na_Gossovete.docx/SPECZASHCHITA report Госсовет/My_na_Gossovete.docxDOCXF02Created
51BKS-0051Nauka_Ciklov_EQVILIBRIUM.docx/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Nauka_Ciklov_EQVILIBRIUM.docxDOCXF01Created
52BKS-0052Nauka_Ciklov_EQVILIBRIUM.pptx/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Nauka_Ciklov_EQVILIBRIUM.pptxPPTXF01Created
53BKS-0053NMA_Nematerialnye_aktivy_master.docx/Машиноведение/NMA_Nematerialnye_aktivy_master.docxDOCXF04Created
54BKS-0054NMA_Nematerialnye_aktivy_presentation.pptx/Машиноведение/NMA_Nematerialnye_aktivy_presentation.pptxPPTXF04Created
55BKS-0055Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema.docx/Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema.docxDOCXF03Created
56BKS-0056Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema.pptx/Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema.pptxPPTXF03Created
57BKS-0057Nuclear_Mathematics_EQUILIBRIUM_AI.pdf/Core Mathematics and Architecture ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Nuclear_Mathematics_EQUILIBRIUM_AI.pdfPDFF10Created
58BKS-0058Nuclear_Mathematics_EQUILIBRIUM_AI.pptx/Core Mathematics and Architecture ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Nuclear_Mathematics_EQUILIBRIUM_AI.pptxPPTXF10Created
59BKS-0059PacifiCorp_Renewable_Energy_PPA_RU_full_translation.docx/Agreement PPA/PacifiCorp_Renewable_Energy_PPA_RU_full_translation.docxDOCXF03Created
60BKS-0060Paket_Dyuminu_Gossovet_Balansy_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.docx/Балансы/Paket_Dyuminu_Gossovet_Balansy_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.docxDOCXF03Created
61BKS-0061Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.docx/Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.docxDOCXF12Created
62BKS-0062Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.pptx/Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.pptxPPTXF12Created
63BKS-0063Pismo_A_R_Belousovu_Doktrina_Pobedy_Strategicheskie_balansy.docx/Письма/Pismo_A_R_Belousovu_Doktrina_Pobedy_Strategicheskie_balansy.docxDOCXF12Created
64BKS-0064Portaly_stikhiy_Gorod_Sobytiy.pptx/City Событий/Portaly_stikhiy_Gorod_Sobytiy.pptxPPTXF11Created
65BKS-0065PPA_annotated_full_translation_RU.docx/Agreement PPA/PPA_annotated_full_translation_RU.docxDOCXF03Created
66BKS-0066Prezentaciya_Doktrina_Pobedy_A_R_Belousovu.pptx/Письма/Prezentaciya_Doktrina_Pobedy_A_R_Belousovu.pptxPPTXF02Created
67BKS-0067Prezentaciya_SPECZASCHITA_Gossovet.pptx/SPECZASHCHITA report Госсовет/Prezentaciya_SPECZASCHITA_Gossovet.pptxPPTXF02Created
68BKS-0068Prezentatsiya_Dyuminu_Gossovet_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.pptx/Балансы/Prezentatsiya_Dyuminu_Gossovet_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.pptxPPTXF03Created
69BKS-0069Prikladnaya_teoriya_potokov_EQ.docx/New Физика/Prikladnaya_teoriya_potokov_EQ.docxDOCXF10Created
70BKS-0070Prikladnaya_teoriya_potokov_EQ.pptx/New Физика/Prikladnaya_teoriya_potokov_EQ.pptxPPTXF10Created
71BKS-0071Prodovolstvennaya_bezopasnost_Biocenoz_i_ferma_polnogo_cikla.docx/Prodovolstvennaya_bezopasnost_Biocenoz_i_ferma_polnogo_cikla.docxDOCXF06Created
72BKS-0072Prodovolstvennaya_bezopasnost_Biocenoz_i_ferma_polnogo_cikla.pptx/Prodovolstvennaya_bezopasnost_Biocenoz_i_ferma_polnogo_cikla.pptxPPTXF06Created
73BKS-0073RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy.docx/City Событий/RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy.docxDOCXF11Created
74BKS-0074RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy_presentation.pdf/City Событий/RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy_presentation.pdfPDFF11Created
75BKS-0075RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy_presentation.pptx/City Событий/RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy_presentation.pptxPPTXF11Created
76BKS-0076Rebra_svyazannosti_SOYUZ741.docx/Theory Поля/Rebra_svyazannosti_SOYUZ741.docxDOCXF01Created
77BKS-0077Rebra_svyazannosti_SOYUZ741.pptx/Theory Поля/Rebra_svyazannosti_SOYUZ741.pptxPPTXF01Created
78BKS-0078Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master(1).docx/Машиноведение/Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master(1).docxDOCXF09Created
79BKS-0079Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master.docx/Машиноведение/Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master.docxDOCXF09Created
80BKS-0080Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master.pdf/Машиноведение/Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master.pdfPDFF09Created
81BKS-0081Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_presentation.pptx/Машиноведение/Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_presentation.pptxPPTXF09Created
82BKS-0082Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.docx/Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.docxDOCXF11Created
83BKS-0083Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.pptx/Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.pptxPPTXF11Created
84BKS-0084Rossiya_Karta_Probuzhdeniya_Master_Document.docx/Rossiya_Karta_Probuzhdeniya_Master_Document.docxDOCXF08Created
85BKS-0085Rossiya_Karta_Probuzhdeniya_Strategic_Presentation.pptx/Rossiya_Karta_Probuzhdeniya_Strategic_Presentation.pptxPPTXF08Created
86BKS-0086Schetnaia_kniga_Arhetipy_i_cikly.docx/Schetnaia_kniga_Arhetipy_i_cikly.docxDOCXF05Created
87BKS-0087Schetnaia_kniga_Arhetipy_i_cikly.pptx/Schetnaia_kniga_Arhetipy_i_cikly.pptxPPTXF05Created
88BKS-0088Schetnaya_sistema_Equilibrium.docx/Schetnaya_sistema_Equilibrium.docxDOCXF01Created
89BKS-0089Schetnaya_sistema_Equilibrium.pptx/Schetnaya_sistema_Equilibrium.pptxPPTXF01Created
90BKS-0090SFERA_banking_financial_system.docx/PPP Bank COOPERATIVE BANKS AND SOCIAL БАНК/SFERA_banking_financial_system.docxDOCXF03Created
91BKS-0091SFERA_banking_financial_system.pptx/PPP Bank COOPERATIVE BANKS AND SOCIAL БАНК/SFERA_banking_financial_system.pptxPPTXF03Created
92BKS-0092SFERA_Grant_Conveyor.pptx/City Событий/SFERA_Grant_Conveyor.pptxPPTXF11Created
93BKS-0093SFERA_Mir_bez_granits.docx/World without границ/SFERA_Mir_bez_granits.docxDOCXF11Created
94BKS-0094SFERA_Mir_bez_granits_presentation.pptx/World without границ/SFERA_Mir_bez_granits_presentation.pptxPPTXF11Created
95BKS-0095SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.docx/City Событий/SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.docxDOCXF11Created
96BKS-0096SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.pdf/City Событий/SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.pdfPDFF11Created
97BKS-0097SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.pptx/City Событий/SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.pptxPPTXF11Created
98BKS-0098Simvolicheskaya_sistema_i_yazyki.docx/Simvolicheskaya_sistema_i_yazyki.docxDOCXF01Created
99BKS-0099Simvolicheskaya_sistema_i_yazyki.pptx/Simvolicheskaya_sistema_i_yazyki.pptxPPTXF01Created
100BKS-0100Sistema_fondov_Lichnye_i_imennye_fondy_i_banki.docx/Sistema_fondov_Lichnye_i_imennye_fondy_i_banki.docxDOCXF03Created
101BKS-0101Sistema_fondov_Lichnye_i_imennye_fondy_i_banki.pptx/Sistema_fondov_Lichnye_i_imennye_fondy_i_banki.pptxPPTXF03Created
102BKS-0102Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.docx/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.docxDOCXF01Created
103BKS-0103Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.pdf/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.pdfPDFF01Created
104BKS-0104Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.pptx/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.pptxPPTXF01Created
105BKS-0105SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Kosmoritmologiya.docx/Кибалион/SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Kosmoritmologiya.docxDOCXF08Created
106BKS-0106SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Kosmoritmologiya.pptx/Кибалион/SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Kosmoritmologiya.pptxPPTXF08Created
107BKS-0107SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Kosmoritmologiya_repeat.pptx/Кибалион/SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Kosmoritmologiya_repeat.pptxPPTXF08Created
108BKS-0108SPECZASCHITA_KIBALION.docx/Кибалион/SPECZASCHITA_KIBALION.docxDOCXF08Created
109BKS-0109SPECZASCHITA_KIBALION.pptx/Кибалион/SPECZASCHITA_KIBALION.pptxPPTXF08Created
110BKS-0110SUR_810_Master_Document.docx/SUR_810_Master_Document.docxDOCXF01Created
111BKS-0111SUR_810_Strategic_Presentation.pptx/SUR_810_Strategic_Presentation.pptxPPTXF01Created
112BKS-0112SUR_Культура_Новый_Уклад.docx/SUR/SUR_Культура_Новый_Уклад.docxDOCXF08Created
113BKS-0113SUR_Культура_Новый_Уклад.pptx/SUR/SUR_Культура_Новый_Уклад.pptxPPTXF08Created
114BKS-0114Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Unifikatsiya_741.docx/Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Unifikatsiya_741.docxDOCXF01Created
115BKS-0115Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Unifikatsiya_741.pptx/Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Unifikatsiya_741.pptxPPTXF01Created
116BKS-0116Tehnologicheskoe_lico_Rossii_Politeh.pptx/Письма/Tehnologicheskoe_lico_Rossii_Politeh.pptxPPTXF12Created
117BKS-0117Tehnologicheskoe_lico_Rossii_Politeh_light.pptx/Письма/Tehnologicheskoe_lico_Rossii_Politeh_light.pptxPPTXF12Created
118BKS-0118Teoriya_Uzlov_SOYUZ741.docx/Theory Поля/Teoriya_Uzlov_SOYUZ741.docxDOCXF01Created
119BKS-0119Teoriya_Uzlov_SOYUZ741.pptx/Theory Поля/Teoriya_Uzlov_SOYUZ741.pptxPPTXF01Created
120BKS-0120UCC_в_надсистеме_ECO-PPA_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_ЕУТ.docx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/UCC_в_надсистеме_ECO-PPA_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_ЕУТ.docxDOCXF03Created
121BKS-0121UCC_в_надсистеме_ECO-PPA_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_ЕУТ.pptx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/UCC_в_надсистеме_ECO-PPA_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_ЕУТ.pptxPPTXF03Created
122BKS-0122Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_master.docx/Машиноведение/Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_master.docxDOCXF04Created
123BKS-0123Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_master.pdf/Машиноведение/Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_master.pdfPDFF04Created
124BKS-0124Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_presentation.pptx/Машиноведение/Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_presentation.pptxPPTXF04Created
125BKS-0125Upravlenie_stranoi_Goskorporatsii_SUR.docx/Upravlenie_stranoi_Goskorporatsii_SUR.docxDOCXF02Created
126BKS-0126Upravlenie_stranoi_Goskorporatsii_SUR.pptx/Upravlenie_stranoi_Goskorporatsii_SUR.pptxPPTXF02Created
127BKS-0127Vozrozhdenie_Zemli_Prezentatsiya.pptx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/Vozrozhdenie_Zemli_Prezentatsiya.pptxPPTXF06Created
128BKS-0128Vozrozhdenie_Zemli_Strategicheskaya_doktrina.docx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/Vozrozhdenie_Zemli_Strategicheskaya_doktrina.docxDOCXF06Created
129BKS-0129Vsemirnye_Hristianskie_Igry_Master_Document.docx/Vsemirnye_Hristianskie_Igry_Master_Document.docxDOCXF08Created
130BKS-0130Vsemirnye_Hristianskie_Igry_Presentation.pptx/Vsemirnye_Hristianskie_Igry_Presentation.pptxPPTXF08Created
131BKS-0131Vychislitelnyi_GRID_Metakompyutery_Federativnye_bazy_Bolshie_vychisleniya.docx/Vychislitelnyi_GRID_Metakompyutery_Federativnye_bazy_Bolshie_vychisleniya.docxDOCXF05Created
132BKS-0132Vychislitelnyi_GRID_Metakompyutery_Federativnye_bazy_Bolshie_vychisleniya.pptx/Vychislitelnyi_GRID_Metakompyutery_Federativnye_bazy_Bolshie_vychisleniya.pptxPPTXF05Created
133BKS-0133Yadernaya_matematika_i_Arhitektura_EKVILIBRIUM.docx/Core Mathematics and Architecture ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Yadernaya_matematika_i_Arhitektura_EKVILIBRIUM.docxDOCXF10Created
134BKS-0134Yadernaya_matematika_i_Arhitektura_EKVILIBRIUM.pptx/Core Mathematics and Architecture ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Yadernaya_matematika_i_Arhitektura_EKVILIBRIUM.pptxPPTXF10Created
135BKS-0135Академическая_инфраструктура_Возрождение_Земли.docx/Академическая_инфраструктура_Возрождение_Земли.docxDOCXF06Created
136BKS-0136Архив_сохранения_наследия_Академическая_интеграция.docx/Архив_сохранения_наследия_Академическая_интеграция.docxDOCXF09Created
137BKS-0137Архив_сохранения_наследия_Академическая_интеграция.pptx/Архив_сохранения_наследия_Академическая_интеграция.pptxPPTXF09Created
138BKS-0138Архив_сохранения_наследия_интеграционная_экосистема.docx/Кладовочка/Архив_сохранения_наследия_интеграционная_экосистема.docxDOCXF09Created
139BKS-0139Архив_сохранения_наследия_интеграционная_экосистема.pptx/Кладовочка/Архив_сохранения_наследия_интеграционная_экосистема.pptxPPTXF09Created
140BKS-0140Атлас_социальных_данных_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/IT система/Атлас_социальных_данных_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF05Created
141BKS-0141Атлас_социальных_данных_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_презентация.pptx/IT система/Атлас_социальных_данных_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_презентация.pptxPPTXF05Created
142BKS-0142Белая_книга_кооператива_расширенная_версия_1_0.docx/Report 01 августа/Белая_книга_кооператива_расширенная_версия_1_0.docxDOCXF07Created
143BKS-0143Биоценоз_Воздух_Концепция.docx/Биоценоз_Воздух_Концепция.docxDOCXF06Created
144BKS-0144Биоценоз_Воздух_Презентация.pptx/Биоценоз_Воздух_Презентация.pptxPPTXF06Created
145BKS-0145Биоценоз_Землепользования_Концепция.docx/Биоценоз_Землепользования_Концепция.docxDOCXF06Created
146BKS-0146Биоценоз_Землепользования_Презентация.pptx/Биоценоз_Землепользования_Презентация.pptxPPTXF06Created
147BKS-0147Биоценозная_точка_мониторинга.pptx/Report 01 августа/Биоценозная_точка_мониторинга.pptxPPTXF06Created
148BKS-0148Биоценозная_точка_мониторинга_концепция.docx/Report 01 августа/Биоценозная_точка_мониторинга_концепция.docxDOCXF06Created
149BKS-0149Биоценозы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_презентация.pptx/IT система/Биоценозы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_презентация.pptxPPTXF06Created
150BKS-0150Виды_PPA_классификация_и_PPA_коренных_народов.docx/Agreement PPA/Виды_PPA_классификация_и_PPA_коренных_народов.docxDOCXF03Created
151BKS-0151Виды_PPA_презентация.pptx/Agreement PPA/Виды_PPA_презентация.pptxPPTXF03Created
152BKS-0152Внешний_контур_ECO_PPA_260_млн_акварельный_стиль.pptx/Report 01 августа/Внешний_контур_ECO_PPA_260_млн_акварельный_стиль.pptxPPTXF12Created
153BKS-0153Внешний_пакет_ECO_PPA_260_млн_уверенная_версия.pptx/Report 01 августа/Внешний_пакет_ECO_PPA_260_млн_уверенная_версия.pptxPPTXF12Created
154BKS-0154ВОДА_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/IT система/ВОДА_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF06Created
155BKS-0155ВОДА_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/IT система/ВОДА_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF06Created
156BKS-0156ВОЗДУХ_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/IT система/ВОЗДУХ_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF06Created
157BKS-0157ВОЗДУХ_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/IT система/ВОЗДУХ_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF06Created
158BKS-0158Возрождение_Земли_Академические_реестры.pptx/Возрождение_Земли_Академические_реестры.pptxPPTXF06Created
159BKS-0159Всемирный_Портал_Кино_СФЕРА.docx/Письма/Всемирный_Портал_Кино_СФЕРА.docxDOCXF09Created
160BKS-0160Всемирный_Портал_Кино_СФЕРА_презентация.pptx/Письма/Всемирный_Портал_Кино_СФЕРА_презентация.pptxPPTXF09Created
161BKS-0161Гидроробототехника_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_исследование.docx/Машиноведение/Гидроробототехника_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_исследование.docxDOCXF04Created
162BKS-0162Гидроробототехника_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_исследование.pdf/Машиноведение/Гидроробототехника_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_исследование.pdfPDFF04Created
163BKS-0163Гидроробототехника_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_презентация.pdf/Машиноведение/Гидроробототехника_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_презентация.pdfPDFF04Created
164BKS-0164Гидроробототехника_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_презентация.pptx/Машиноведение/Гидроробототехника_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_презентация.pptxPPTXF04Created
165BKS-0165Гиперграфы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Гиперграфы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF01Created
166BKS-0166Гиперграфы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_читабельно.pptx/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Гиперграфы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_читабельно.pptxPPTXF01Created
167BKS-0167Государственная_программа_ОГОНЬ.docx/IT система/Государственная_программа_ОГОНЬ.docxDOCXF02Created
168BKS-0168Государственная_программа_ОГОНЬ.pptx/IT система/Государственная_программа_ОГОНЬ.pptxPPTXF02Created
169BKS-0169Договор_ренты_PPA_Rent_Framework.pptx/Agreement PPA/Договор_ренты_PPA_Rent_Framework.pptxPPTXF03Created
170BKS-0170Договор_ренты_комплект_типовых_форм.docx/Agreement PPA/Договор_ренты_комплект_типовых_форм.docxDOCXF03Created
171BKS-0171Доктрина_Победы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/Philosophy Войны/Доктрина_Победы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF02Created
172BKS-0172Доктрина_Победы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Презентация.pdf/Philosophy Войны/Доктрина_Победы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Презентация.pdfPDFF02Created
173BKS-0173Доктрина_Победы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Презентация.pptx/Philosophy Войны/Доктрина_Победы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Презентация.pptxPPTXF02Created
174BKS-0174Дополненный_первичный_контур_отчета_кооператива.docx/Report 01 августа/Дополненный_первичный_контур_отчета_кооператива.docxDOCXF12Created
175BKS-0175Единый_строительный_портал_398-р_презентация.pptx/Unified construction портал/Единый_строительный_портал_398-р_презентация.pptxPPTXF04Created
176BKS-0176Единый_строительный_портал_архитектура_398-р.docx/Unified construction портал/Единый_строительный_портал_архитектура_398-р.docxDOCXF04Created
177BKS-0177ЕУТ_Единые_унифицированные_технологии.docx/New Физика/ЕУТ_Единые_унифицированные_технологии.docxDOCXF10Created
178BKS-0178ЕУТ_Единые_унифицированные_технологии_презентация.pptx/New Физика/ЕУТ_Единые_унифицированные_технологии_презентация.pptxPPTXF10Created
179BKS-0179ЗЕМЛЯ_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/IT система/ЗЕМЛЯ_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF05Created
180BKS-0180ЗЕМЛЯ_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/IT система/ЗЕМЛЯ_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF05Created
181BKS-0181ИАЦ_концепция_для_первого_лица.docx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/ИАЦ_концепция_для_первого_лица.docxDOCXF11Created
182BKS-0182ИАЦ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Социальный_капитал_и_институциональное_проектирование.docx/36/ИАЦ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Социальный_капитал_и_институциональное_проектирование.docxDOCXF07Created
183BKS-0183ИАЦ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Социальный_капитал_и_институциональное_проектирование.pptx/36/ИАЦ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Социальный_капитал_и_институциональное_проектирование.pptxPPTXF07Created
184BKS-0184ИАЦ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Социальный_капитал_институциональное_проектирование_расширенная_презентация.pptx/36/ИАЦ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Социальный_капитал_институциональное_проектирование_расширенная_презентация.pptxPPTXF07Created
185BKS-0185ИМАШ_РАН_Стратегическая_концепция_2026-2035.pptx/SUR/ИМАШ_РАН_Стратегическая_концепция_2026-2035.pptxPPTXF04Created
186BKS-0186ИМАШ_РАН_Стратегическая_концепция_SUR_2026-2035.docx/SUR/ИМАШ_РАН_Стратегическая_концепция_SUR_2026-2035.docxDOCXF04Created
187BKS-0187Индустриальные_мегапроекты_аналитическая_доктрина.docx/36/Индустриальные_мегапроекты_аналитическая_доктрина.docxDOCXF04Created
188BKS-0188Индустриальные_мегапроекты_презентация.pptx/36/Индустриальные_мегапроекты_презентация.pptxPPTXF04Created
189BKS-0189Инструменты_валидации_Архив_и_Интеллектуальная_система.docx/Инструменты_валидации_Архив_и_Интеллектуальная_система.docxDOCXF09Created
190BKS-0190Инструменты_валидации_Архив_и_Интеллектуальная_система.pptx/Инструменты_валидации_Архив_и_Интеллектуальная_система.pptxPPTXF09Created
191BKS-0191КАВОТ+БС_—_презентация_для_банка.pptx/Письма/КАВОТ+БС_—_презентация_для_банка.pptxPPTXF03Sourcebook
192BKS-0192Книга_Универсальных_Законов_и_Унифицированных_Технологий.docx/New Физика/Книга_Универсальных_Законов_и_Унифицированных_Технологий.docxDOCXF10Created
193BKS-0193Книга_Универсальных_Законов_и_Унифицированных_Технологий_Презентация.pptx/New Физика/Книга_Универсальных_Законов_и_Унифицированных_Технологий_Презентация.pptxPPTXF10Created
194BKS-0194Консолидация_стран.docx/Консолидация_стран.docxDOCXF11Created
195BKS-0195Консолидация_стран.pptx/Консолидация_стран.pptxPPTXF11Created
196BKS-0196Консолидация_стран_Презентация.pptx/Консолидация_стран_Презентация.pptxPPTXF11Created
197BKS-0197Консолидация_стран_Стратегический_доклад.docx/Консолидация_стран_Стратегический_доклад.docxDOCXF11Created
198BKS-0198Кооперативная_Биржа_Труда_Социальная_кооперация.docx/Social Кооперация/Кооперативная_Биржа_Труда_Социальная_кооперация.docxDOCXF07Created
199BKS-0199Кооперативная_Биржа_Труда_Социальная_кооперация.pptx/Social Кооперация/Кооперативная_Биржа_Труда_Социальная_кооперация.pptxPPTXF07Created
200BKS-0200Культура_Нового_уклада.docx/Social Кооперация/Культура_Нового_уклада.docxDOCXF07Created
201BKS-0201Культура_Нового_уклада.pptx/Social Кооперация/Культура_Нового_уклада.pptxPPTXF07Created
202BKS-0202Личные_и_именные_фонды_ЕГ.docx/Book кинов/Личные_и_именные_фонды_ЕГ.docxDOCXF09Created
203BKS-0203Личные_и_именные_фонды_ЕГ.pptx/Book кинов/Личные_и_именные_фонды_ЕГ.pptxPPTXF09Created
204BKS-0204Материаловедение_2_0_Реестр_материалов_цифровые_паспорта_валидация.docx/SUR/Материаловедение_2_0_Реестр_материалов_цифровые_паспорта_валидация.docxDOCXF04Created
205BKS-0205Материаловедение_2_0_Реестр_материалов_цифровые_паспорта_валидация.pdf/SUR/Материаловедение_2_0_Реестр_материалов_цифровые_паспорта_валидация.pdfPDFF04Created
206BKS-0206Материаловедение_2_0_Реестр_материалов_цифровые_паспорта_валидация.pptx/SUR/Материаловедение_2_0_Реестр_материалов_цифровые_паспорта_валидация.pptxPPTXF04Created
207BKS-0207Материаловедение_и_транспорт_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/General конструктор/Материаловедение_и_транспорт_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF04Created
208BKS-0208МАТЕРИАЛОВЕДЕНИЕ_керамика_и_синтетические_кристаллы(1).pptx/Projects ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/МАТЕРИАЛОВЕДЕНИЕ_керамика_и_синтетические_кристаллы(1).pptxPPTXF04Created
209BKS-0209МАТЕРИАЛОВЕДЕНИЕ_керамика_и_синтетические_кристаллы.docx/SUR/МАТЕРИАЛОВЕДЕНИЕ_керамика_и_синтетические_кристаллы.docxDOCXF04Created
210BKS-0210МАТЕРИАЛОВЕДЕНИЕ_керамика_и_синтетические_кристаллы.pptx/SUR/МАТЕРИАЛОВЕДЕНИЕ_керамика_и_синтетические_кристаллы.pptxPPTXF04Created
211BKS-0211МАТЕРИАЛОВЕДЕНИЕ_керамика_и_синтетические_кристаллы.pptx/Projects ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/МАТЕРИАЛОВЕДЕНИЕ_керамика_и_синтетические_кристаллы.pptxPPTXF04Sourcebook
212BKS-0212Материаловедение_СКФЭ_керамика_синтетические_кристаллы.docx/Машиноведение/Материаловедение_СКФЭ_керамика_синтетические_кристаллы.docxDOCXF04Created
213BKS-0213МЕСТО_единая_система_хранения.docx/Кладовочка/МЕСТО_единая_система_хранения.docxDOCXF09Sourcebook
214BKS-0214МЕСТО_единая_система_хранения_презентация.pptx/Кладовочка/МЕСТО_единая_система_хранения_презентация.pptxPPTXF09Created
215BKS-0215Мир_без_границ_продвижение_портала.docx/World without границ/Мир_без_границ_продвижение_портала.docxDOCXF11Created
216BKS-0216Мир_без_границ_продвижение_портала.pdf/World without границ/Мир_без_границ_продвижение_портала.pdfPDFF11Created
217BKS-0217Мир_без_границ_продвижение_портала.pptx/World without границ/Мир_без_границ_продвижение_портала.pptxPPTXF11Created
218BKS-0218Нарративы_и_ценности_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_13x20.docx/Social Кооперация/Нарративы_и_ценности_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_13x20.docxDOCXF07Created
219BKS-0219Нарративы_и_ценности_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_13x20.pptx/Social Кооперация/Нарративы_и_ценности_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_13x20.pptxPPTXF07Created
220BKS-0220Наука_Поля_СОЮЗ-741.docx/Theory Поля/Наука_Поля_СОЮЗ-741.docxDOCXF10Created
221BKS-0221Национальные_центры_валидации_ESG-IR_ECO-PPA.docx/Agreement PPA/Национальные_центры_валидации_ESG-IR_ECO-PPA.docxDOCXF03Created
222BKS-0222Национальные_центры_валидации_ESG-IR_ECO-PPA.pptx/Agreement PPA/Национальные_центры_валидации_ESG-IR_ECO-PPA.pptxPPTXF03Created
223BKS-0223Нейросвод_Культуры_и_Цивилизации_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Нейросвод_Культуры_и_Цивилизации_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF08Created
224BKS-0224Нейросвод_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Нейросвод_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF01Created
225BKS-0225Нейросвод_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Нейросвод_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF01Created
226BKS-0226New SKFE industry металлургия.docx/Machine science/New SKFE industry металлургия.docxDOCXF04Sourcebook
227BKS-0227Новая_финансовая_система_Человек_эмиссионный_центр_и_банк_ЕГ.docx/Book кинов/Новая_финансовая_система_Человек_эмиссионный_центр_и_банк_ЕГ.docxDOCXF03Created
228BKS-0228Новая_финансовая_система_Человек_эмиссионный_центр_и_банк_ЕГ.pptx/Book кинов/Новая_финансовая_система_Человек_эмиссионный_центр_и_банк_ЕГ.pptxPPTXF03Created
229BKS-0229НПП_АСИ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/НПП_АСИ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF02Created
230BKS-0230НПП_АСИ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/НПП_АСИ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF02Created
231BKS-0231ОРИОН_22-22_Стратегическая_концепция.docx/ОРИОН_22-22_Стратегическая_концепция.docxDOCXF01Created
232BKS-0232ОРИОН_22-22_Стратегическая_презентация.pptx/ОРИОН_22-22_Стратегическая_презентация.pptxPPTXF01Created
233BKS-0233Парки_России_и_мира_Города_Знания_Суперкласс.docx/Projects ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Парки_России_и_мира_Города_Знания_Суперкласс.docxDOCXF11Created
234BKS-0234Парки_России_и_мира_Города_Знания_Суперкласс.pdf/Projects ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Парки_России_и_мира_Города_Знания_Суперкласс.pdfPDFF11Created
235BKS-0235Парки_России_и_мира_Города_Знания_Суперкласс.pptx/Projects ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Парки_России_и_мира_Города_Знания_Суперкласс.pptxPPTXF11Created
236BKS-0236Первичный_контур_отчета_о_результатах_работы_кооператива.docx/Report 01 августа/Первичный_контур_отчета_о_результатах_работы_кооператива.docxDOCXF12Sourcebook
237BKS-0237Пилот_ECO_PPA_260_млн_дорожная_карта_WBG_адаптировано.pptx/Report 01 августа/Пилот_ECO_PPA_260_млн_дорожная_карта_WBG_адаптировано.pptxPPTXF12Created
238BKS-0238Планета_как_одно_государство_ЕГ.docx/Book кинов/Планета_как_одно_государство_ЕГ.docxDOCXF09Created
239BKS-0239Планета_как_одно_государство_ЕГ.pptx/Book кинов/Планета_как_одно_государство_ЕГ.pptxPPTXF09Created
240BKS-0240Планетарный_Баланс_и_Баланс_Биосферы_ЕГ.docx/Book кинов/Планетарный_Баланс_и_Баланс_Биосферы_ЕГ.docxDOCXF09Created
241BKS-0241Планетарный_Баланс_и_Баланс_Биосферы_ЕГ.pptx/Book кинов/Планетарный_Баланс_и_Баланс_Биосферы_ЕГ.pptxPPTXF09Created
242BKS-0242Портал_пяти_стихий_Эстафета_Огня_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/IT система/Портал_пяти_стихий_Эстафета_Огня_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF05Created
243BKS-0243Портал_пяти_стихий_Эстафета_Огня_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/IT система/Портал_пяти_стихий_Эстафета_Огня_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF05Created
244BKS-0244Презентация_смета_260_млн_ECO_PPA.pptx/Report 01 августа/Презентация_смета_260_млн_ECO_PPA.pptxPPTXF03Created
245BKS-0245Профсоюз_4_0_Презентация.pptx/Agreement PPA/Профсоюз_4_0_Презентация.pptxPPTXF03Created
246BKS-0246Профсоюз_4_0_Стратегическая_программа.docx/Agreement PPA/Профсоюз_4_0_Стратегическая_программа.docxDOCXF03Created
247BKS-0247Реестр_741_Полей_СОЮЗ-741.docx/Theory Поля/Реестр_741_Полей_СОЮЗ-741.docxDOCXF01Created
248BKS-0248Реестр_741_Полей_СОЮЗ-741.pptx/Theory Поля/Реестр_741_Полей_СОЮЗ-741.pptxPPTXF01Created
249BKS-0249Реестр_фондов_НПК_НПО_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА.docx/Реестр_фондов_НПК_НПО_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА.docxDOCXF03Created
250BKS-0250Роли_Наций_ОС_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Роли_Наций_ОС_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF01Created
251BKS-0251Роли_Наций_ОС_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/NEUROSVOD ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Роли_Наций_ОС_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF01Created
252BKS-0252Россия_Анализ_баланса_госкорпораций_30_лет_Новый_Уклад.docx/Машиноведение/Россия_Анализ_баланса_госкорпораций_30_лет_Новый_Уклад.docxDOCXF04Created
253BKS-0253Россия_Анализ_баланса_госкорпораций_30_лет_Новый_Уклад.pptx/Машиноведение/Россия_Анализ_баланса_госкорпораций_30_лет_Новый_Уклад.pptxPPTXF04Created
254BKS-0254Россия_Идеальное_Мироустройство.docx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/Россия_Идеальное_Мироустройство.docxDOCXF08Created
255BKS-0255Россия_Идеальное_Мироустройство_светлая_презентация.pptx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/Россия_Идеальное_Мироустройство_светлая_презентация.pptxPPTXF08Created
256BKS-0256Россия_Идеальное_Мироустройство_светлая_радостная.pptx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/Россия_Идеальное_Мироустройство_светлая_радостная.pptxPPTXF08Created
257BKS-0257Россия_Мастер_Стихий_БИОТРОН_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/IT система/Россия_Мастер_Стихий_БИОТРОН_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF06Created
258BKS-0258Россия_Мастер_Стихий_БИОТРОН_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/IT система/Россия_Мастер_Стихий_БИОТРОН_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF06Created
259BKS-0259Россия_Науки_Будущего.docx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/Россия_Науки_Будущего.docxDOCXF10Created
260BKS-0260Россия_Науки_Будущего_презентация.pptx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/Россия_Науки_Будущего_презентация.pptxPPTXF10Created
261BKS-0261Россия_Новый_Уклад.docx/Машиноведение/Россия_Новый_Уклад.docxDOCXF04Created
262BKS-0262Россия_Новый_Уклад.pdf/Машиноведение/Россия_Новый_Уклад.pdfPDFF04Created
263BKS-0263Россия_Новый_Уклад.pptx/Машиноведение/Россия_Новый_Уклад.pptxPPTXF04Created
264BKS-0264Россия_Система_планирования_и_конструирования.docx/Машиноведение/Россия_Система_планирования_и_конструирования.docxDOCXF04Created
265BKS-0265Россия_Система_планирования_и_конструирования.pdf/Машиноведение/Россия_Система_планирования_и_конструирования.pdfPDFF04Created
266BKS-0266Россия_Система_планирования_и_конструирования.pptx/Машиноведение/Россия_Система_планирования_и_конструирования.pptxPPTXF04Created
267BKS-0267Русский_мир_цели_стратегия_структура.docx/36/Русский_мир_цели_стратегия_структура.docxDOCXF08Created
268BKS-0268Русский_мир_цели_стратегия_структура.pptx/36/Русский_мир_цели_стратегия_структура.pptxPPTXF08Created
269BKS-0269Русский_мир_цели_стратегия_структура_читабельно(1).pptx/36/Русский_мир_цели_стратегия_структура_читабельно(1).pptxPPTXF08Created
270BKS-0270Русский_мир_цели_стратегия_структура_читабельно.pptx/36/Русский_мир_цели_стратегия_структура_читабельно.pptxPPTXF08Created
271BKS-0271Русский_мир_цели_стратегия_структура_читабельно_крупные_шрифты.pptx/36/Русский_мир_цели_стратегия_структура_читабельно_крупные_шрифты.pptxPPTXF08Created
272BKS-0272Самовалидирующаяся_природно-техническая_система.docx/SUR/Самовалидирующаяся_природно-техническая_система.docxDOCXF06Created
273BKS-0273Самовалидирующаяся_природно-техническая_система.pptx/SUR/Самовалидирующаяся_природно-техническая_система.pptxPPTXF06Created
274BKS-0274Связанность_лучших_проектов_мира_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/Связанность_лучших_проектов_мира_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF11Created
275BKS-0275Связанность_лучших_проектов_мира_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/Связанность_лучших_проектов_мира_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF11Created
276BKS-0276Aleksandr Selenkin Геннадьевич.pdf/Rakoshits doctrine Ross/Aleksandr Selenkin Геннадьевич.pdfPDFF02Sourcebook
277BKS-0277Система_систем_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/Система_систем_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF01Created
278BKS-0278Слабые_стороны_стран_и_регионов.pptx/36/Слабые_стороны_стран_и_регионов.pptxPPTXF11Created
279BKS-0279Смета_260_млн_экомодули_и_мини_генерация.xlsx/Report 01 августа/Смета_260_млн_экомодули_и_мини_генерация.xlsxXLSXF06Created
280BKS-0280Социальный_маркетплейс_концепция.docx/Social Кооперация/Социальный_маркетплейс_концепция.docxDOCXF07Created
281BKS-0281Социальный_маркетплейс_презентация.pptx/Social Кооперация/Социальный_маркетплейс_презентация.pptxPPTXF07Created
282BKS-0282СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_Гидроробототехника.docx/Машиноведение/СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_Гидроробототехника.docxDOCXF04Created
283BKS-0283СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_Гидроробототехника.pptx/Машиноведение/СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_Гидроробототехника.pptxPPTXF04Created
284BKS-0284СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_Судостроение_ОСК_ВТБ_Инмортранс_Океан80.docx/Машиноведение/СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_Судостроение_ОСК_ВТБ_Инмортранс_Океан80.docxDOCXF04Created
285BKS-0285СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_Судостроение_ОСК_ВТБ_Инмортранс_Океан80.pptx/Машиноведение/СПЕЦЗАЩИТА_Судостроение_ОСК_ВТБ_Инмортранс_Океан80.pptxPPTXF04Created
286BKS-0286Стандарт_развития_Человека_СРЧ_1.0.docx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/Стандарт_развития_Человека_СРЧ_1.0.docxDOCXF07Created
287BKS-0287Стандарты_развития_Человека_СРЧ_1.0.pptx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/Стандарты_развития_Человека_СРЧ_1.0.pptxPPTXF07Created
288BKS-0288СФЕРА_единое_пространство_инициатив.docx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/СФЕРА_единое_пространство_инициатив.docxDOCXF07Created
289BKS-0289СФЕРА_единое_пространство_инициатив.pptx/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/СФЕРА_единое_пространство_инициатив.pptxPPTXF07Created
290BKS-0290СФЕРА_Новый_уклад_Кодированное_искусство.docx/City Событий/СФЕРА_Новый_уклад_Кодированное_искусство.docxDOCXF11Created
291BKS-0291СФЕРА_Новый_уклад_Кодированное_искусство_презентация.pdf/City Событий/СФЕРА_Новый_уклад_Кодированное_искусство_презентация.pdfPDFF11Created
292BKS-0292СФЕРА_Новый_уклад_Кодированное_искусство_презентация.pptx/City Событий/СФЕРА_Новый_уклад_Кодированное_искусство_презентация.pptxPPTXF11Created
293BKS-0293Теория_Графов_СОЮЗ741.docx/Theory Поля/Теория_Графов_СОЮЗ741.docxDOCXF01Created
294BKS-0294Теория_Графов_СОЮЗ741_Презентация.pptx/Theory Поля/Теория_Графов_СОЮЗ741_Презентация.pptxPPTXF01Created
295BKS-0295Теория_Узлов_СОЮЗ741_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/Theory Поля/Теория_Узлов_СОЮЗ741_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF01Created
296BKS-0296Теория_Узлов_СОЮЗ741_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/Theory Поля/Теория_Узлов_СОЮЗ741_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF01Created
297BKS-0297Транспортно-промышленный_контур_России_2035-2050.docx/General конструктор/Транспортно-промышленный_контур_России_2035-2050.docxDOCXF04Created
298BKS-0298Транспортно-промышленный_контур_России_2035-2050.pptx/General конструктор/Транспортно-промышленный_контур_России_2035-2050.pptxPPTXF04Created
299BKS-0299Универсальный_закон_систем.docx/New Физика/Универсальный_закон_систем.docxDOCXF10Created
300BKS-0300Универсальный_закон_систем_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/New Физика/Универсальный_закон_систем_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF10Created
301BKS-0301Управление_стихиями_светлая_презентация.pptx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/Управление_стихиями_светлая_презентация.pptxPPTXF06Created
302BKS-0302Управление_стихиями_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/EQUILIBRIUM Unique Россия/Управление_стихиями_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF06Created
303BKS-0303CHARTER OF NPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA - website format ФОТО.pdf/ORION22:22/CHARTER OF NPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA - website format ФОТО.pdfPDFF01Sourcebook
304BKS-0304Фонды_НПК_НПО_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА.pptx/Фонды_НПК_НПО_СПЕЦЗАЩИТА.pptxPPTXF03Created
305BKS-0305Формула_Генплана_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/Core Mathematics and Architecture ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Формула_Генплана_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF10Created
306BKS-0306Формула_Генплана_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_презентация.pptx/Core Mathematics and Architecture ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ/Формула_Генплана_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_презентация.pptxPPTXF10Created
307BKS-0307Хеджирование_Силы_России.docx/Машиноведение/Хеджирование_Силы_России.docxDOCXF04Created
308BKS-0308Хеджирование_Силы_России.pptx/Машиноведение/Хеджирование_Силы_России.pptxPPTXF04Created
309BKS-0309Цивилизация.docx/Social Кооперация/Цивилизация.docxDOCXF07Created
310BKS-0310Цивилизация.pptx/Social Кооперация/Цивилизация.pptxPPTXF07Created
311BKS-0311Эволюция_стандартов_и_эталонов_Стройкомплекс_РФ.docx/Эволюция_стандартов_и_эталонов_Стройкомплекс_РФ.docxDOCXF04Created
312BKS-0312Эволюция_стандартов_и_эталонов_Стройкомплекс_РФ.pptx/Эволюция_стандартов_и_эталонов_Стройкомплекс_РФ.pptxPPTXF04Created
313BKS-0313ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Гиперлупы_и_скоростные_системы.docx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Гиперлупы_и_скоростные_системы.docxDOCXF04Created
314BKS-0314ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Гиперлупы_и_скоростные_системы.pptx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Гиперлупы_и_скоростные_системы.pptxPPTXF04Created
315BKS-0315ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Индустриальный_контур_технологий.docx/36/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Индустриальный_контур_технологий.docxDOCXF04Created
316BKS-0316ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Индустриальный_контур_технологий.pptx/36/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Индустриальный_контур_технологий.pptxPPTXF04Created
317BKS-0317ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Как_собрать_в_Единое.docx/IT система/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Как_собрать_в_Единое.docxDOCXF01Created
318BKS-0318ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Как_собрать_в_Единое_презентация.pptx/IT система/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Как_собрать_в_Единое_презентация.pptxPPTXF01Created
319BKS-0319ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Материаловедение_и_транспорт.pptx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Материаловедение_и_транспорт.pptxPPTXF04Created
320BKS-0320ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Межотраслевой_контур_презентация.pptx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Межотраслевой_контур_презентация.pptxPPTXF02Created
321BKS-0321ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Межотраслевой_федеральный_контур.docx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Межотраслевой_федеральный_контур.docxDOCXF02Created
322BKS-0322ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минобрнауки_ведомственная_записка.docx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минобрнауки_ведомственная_записка.docxDOCXF02Created
323BKS-0323ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минобрнауки_презентация.pptx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минобрнауки_презентация.pptxPPTXF02Created
324BKS-0324ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минприроды_ведомственная_записка.docx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минприроды_ведомственная_записка.docxDOCXF02Created
325BKS-0325ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минприроды_презентация.pptx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минприроды_презентация.pptxPPTXF02Created
326BKS-0326ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минпромторг_ведомственная_записка.docx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минпромторг_ведомственная_записка.docxDOCXF02Created
327BKS-0327ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минпромторг_презентация.pptx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минпромторг_презентация.pptxPPTXF02Created
328BKS-0328ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минстрой_ведомственная_записка.docx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минстрой_ведомственная_записка.docxDOCXF02Created
329BKS-0329ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минстрой_презентация.pptx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минстрой_презентация.pptxPPTXF02Created
330BKS-0330ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минтранс_ведомственная_записка.docx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минтранс_ведомственная_записка.docxDOCXF02Created
331BKS-0331ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минтранс_презентация.pptx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минтранс_презентация.pptxPPTXF02Created
332BKS-0332ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минцифры_ведомственная_записка.docx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минцифры_ведомственная_записка.docxDOCXF02Created
333BKS-0333ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минцифры_презентация.pptx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минцифры_презентация.pptxPPTXF02Created
334BKS-0334ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минэкономразвития_ведомственная_записка.docx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минэкономразвития_ведомственная_записка.docxDOCXF02Created
335BKS-0335ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минэкономразвития_презентация.pptx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минэкономразвития_презентация.pptxPPTXF02Created
336BKS-0336ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минэнерго_ведомственная_записка.docx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минэнерго_ведомственная_записка.docxDOCXF02Created
337BKS-0337ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минэнерго_презентация.pptx/General конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минэнерго_презентация.pptxPPTXF02Created
338BKS-0338ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_ОС_1.0.docx/IT система/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_ОС_1.0.docxDOCXF01Created
339BKS-0339ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_ОС_1.0_Презентация.pptx/IT система/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_ОС_1.0_Презентация.pptxPPTXF01Created
340BKS-0340ЭКО-PPA_Минигенерация_Экомодули_Биоценозы_Робототехника_Валидация.docx/SUR/ЭКО-PPA_Минигенерация_Экомодули_Биоценозы_Робототехника_Валидация.docxDOCXF06Created
341BKS-0341ЭКО-PPA_Минигенерация_Экомодули_Биоценозы_Робототехника_Валидация.pptx/SUR/ЭКО-PPA_Минигенерация_Экомодули_Биоценозы_Робототехника_Валидация.pptxPPTXF06Created
342BKS-0342ЭФИР_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/IT система/ЭФИР_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF06Created
343BKS-0343ЭФИР_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx/IT система/ЭФИР_Портал_пяти_стихий_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptxPPTXF06Created
344BKS-0344ЭФС_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx/IT система/ЭФС_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCXF05Created

Annex B. The Legend of Themed Families

CodeThematic familyNumber
F01Metasystems, classifiers and ORION41
F02Public administration, security and doctrines36
F03Economics, Balance Sheets, Finance, Funds and PPA39
F04Industry, materials, construction and transport48
F05Digital Systems, Data, AI and Computing13
F06Ecology, biocenoses and natural systems28
F07Social cooperation, people and institutions21
F08Culture, Civilization and Meanings27
F09Heritage, Archives, Memory and Media26
F10Science, Mathematics, Physics and Universal Laws20
F11Territories, international integration and development projects31
F12Service, targeted and unrecognized materials14

Editorial note. The rubric is assigned deterministically by name and path and is a navigation hypothesis; meaningful expertise can add secondary families without changing the identity of the record.

Another published edition: WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY Белая_Книга_Судьбы_Стратегическая_презентация.pptx · web text +

Fate is an open trajectory. Recovery is a verifiable recovery.

16 KON Principles • Planetary Lotus • BAL‑741 • ORION22:22 • Complete Register of 344 Works

30 August 2026 | Version 1.0

Two definitions hold boundaries

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 02

Metaphors become useful only after an explicit definition and prohibition of unacceptable applications

FATE

REVIVAL

An open trajectory of conditions, choices, randomness, relationships, actions, consequences, and learning.

Restoring the ability to live, learn, create, collaborate, and transfer value — with observable results.

NO prediction • NO verdict • NO human role calculated

Use • Security • Rights • Dimension • Memory

Terms ≠ Sentence | Scenario ≠ Prophecy | Indicator ≠ Dignity

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

The White Paper: A Single Route

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 03

The original systems remain independent; the general outline links meaning, proof and action

Meaning and Ethics

16 KON Principles

Overall testable contour

Body and Memory

Memory

↓

understanding

↓

Free choice

↓

action

↓

Consequence

↓

verification

↓

new heritage

344 works

Context and balance

19 Contours × 13 Steam × 3 Levels

Evidence

Z0–Z4 • E0–E4 • provenance

Action and Revival

Pilot → Test → Legacy

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Fate remains many options.

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 04

Management makes conditions, alternatives, consequences and possibility of revision visible

Alternative A

Terms

Signal

Scripts

Selection

Action

Result

Alternative B

Freedom of choice requires information, authority, protection from coercion, and the right to reconsider a decision.

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Regeneration: The Restored Ability

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 05

The fact of improvement is confirmed regarding the baseline and without hidden transfer of harm

LIVE

LEARN

CREATE

COOPERATION

TRANSFER

Health • Safety • Environment

Knowledge • Culture • Feedback

labor • technology • resources

Trust • Right • Cooperation

Archive • Rights • Transfer

Confirmation = base line + indicator + source + independent verification + absence of unacceptable harm

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Thought Flow Preserves Origin

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 06

AI helps to form hypotheses and connections; critical authority remains in Man

Signal

Hypothesis

Mandate

Verification

Context

Scenario

Action

Memory

AI offers • The man decides • The evidence checks • The archive preserves

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

The 16 KON Principles define ethical admissibility

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 07

The modern philosophical and ethical framework is not a proven physical law and not a dogma.

BASIC

RELATIONSHIP

K01 Continuity and improvement

K02 Will and moral choice

K03 The identity of a part and a whole

K04 Creation

K05 Similarity and environment

K06 Resonance and transformation

K07 Long horizon of life

K08 Causality and Responsibility

IMPLEMENTATION

UPDATE

K09 Conformity to purpose

K10 Thoughts and attention

K11 Magnetism and responsible leadership

K12 Conservation and conversion of resources

K13 Exchange and reciprocity

K14 Gratitude and Learning

K15 Impact and public contribution

K16 Replacement, upgrade and upgrade

Awareness → choice → action → consequence → feedback → improvement

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

CONES 1–8: Base and connectivity

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 08

Each COD has a sense, testable feature and limitation of application

Continuity and improvement

Will and moral choice

Inherited biological, cultural, family and institutional...

Will is the ability to hold the chosen direction, correlating the impuls...

Criterion: The proportion of decisions based on...

Criteria: Fulfillment of voluntarily accepted obligations.

The identity of the part and the whole

Creation

Man is included in great systems; the similarity of part and whole uses...

Creation is the production of a value that supports life, the dignity of life.

Criterion: Number of relationships taken into account

Criterion: Proven utility

Similarity and Wednesday

Resonance and Transformation

The environment is formed by common interests, attitudes, choices, algo...

Information elicits a response; maturity consists of not passing...

Criterion: Variety of reliable contacts

Criterion: Reducing escalation

Long horizon of life

Causality and responsibility

The practical core is to consider the consequences beyond short-term...

Karma is interpreted as an ethical-philosophical image of causes and consequences.

Percentage of long-term indicators

Criterion: Quality of analysis of the root causes

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

CONS 9–16: implementation and update

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 09

Each COD has a sense, testable feature and limitation of application

Conformity to purpose

World of Thought and Attention

Purpose is the dynamic correspondence of abilities, values,...

Thoughts affect perception, emotions and behavior, but do not materialize.

Criterion: Growth of skill

Criterion: Reducing cognitive distortions

Magnetism and Responsible Leadership

Conservation and conversion of resources

Influence arises from trust, competence, status, communication.

The physical law of conservation of energy is not directly transferred to the emoticon.

Criterion: Trust

Criterion: Resource intensity of the result

Exchange and reciprocity

Gratitude and Learning

Viable systems exist due to the exchange of matter, energy and energy.

Gratitude helps to notice the support and meaning, but does not require...

Criterion: Balance of contributions and benefits

Criterion: Culture of recognition

Impact and social contribution

Replace, upgrade and upgrade

Giving is the voluntary direction of time, knowledge, means or resources.

Living systems retain their identity through renewal; the transition requires...

Criterion: Confirmed effect

Criterion: Speed of safe adaptation

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Planetary Lotus - an accurate map 3×19×13

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 10

the Three Flowers 19 Node; 13 Balance pairs are applied to each subject contour

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

19 outlines describe the reproduction of the whole

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 11

Historical Name "19 Balance Sheets; and Regulations C01–C19 — Subject contours

C01 People and demography

C02 Health and rehabilitation

C03 Education and talents

C04 Culture and heritage

C05 Science and Technology

C06 Industry and materials

C07 Energy

C08 Food and agriculture

C09 Water and hydrosphere

C10 Ecology and biodiversity

C11 Territory, cities and settlement

C12 Transport and logistics

C13 Digital environment, data and AI

C14 Finance and investments

C15 Labour, entrepreneurship and cooperation

C16 Governance, law and trust

C17 Security and Continuity

C18 International Cooperation

C19 Long horizon

Outline Answers: WHAT is reproduced? • Balance Answers: Between which poles is the result held?

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

13 Balance pairs detect distortions

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 12

Balance does not mean compromise at all costs: it shows benefit, risk, limitation and externality.

Security - Development

Labor - Capital

Man is a state

Competition - cooperation

Center - regions

Innovation - reliability

Nature — technosphere

Digital efficiency — human sovereignty

Sovereignty — Openness

Tradition - Update

Present - future

Agglomeration growth - spatial connectivity

Efficiency — fairness

B01–B13 apply to everyone 19 the contours on each of the three levels S1–S3.

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

741

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 13

BAL-741 - address of the situation, not the final score

One cell answers three questions: what, between what and at what level

Subjects

Contours

Steam

Balance

Levels

S1–S3

Addressable

Cells

Example address: BAL:C09:B04:S3 → Water and hydrosphere × Nature - technosphere × Global level

Z0 → Z1 → Z2 → Z3 → Z4 — Evidence of one cell, not new balances

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Cell passport BAL-741

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 14

The address becomes manageable only together with the purpose, sources, rights, risks and memory

Address and versions of schemes

Result subject

Balance and distortions

Permanent code

The observed effect

two poles

Level and territory

Base line Z0

Purpose and thresholds

scale of manifestation

fact before action

minimum and stop

Indicators and sources

Scenarios and uncertainty

Resources and obligations

formula and unit

minimum 2 options

Source and Reserve

Rights, consent and veto

Effect and external consequences

Provenance and Archive

Human Authority

Transfer of Damage

version and proof

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Example: water, soil and swimming pool

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 15

BAL:C09:B04:S3 links natural restoration, technology, rights and cross-border inspection

Map of water, soils, runoff, biodiversity and sources of pollution

Verified indicators

Reducing health risks and restoring pool reproducibility

Goal

• Water quality

• Soil pollution

• treated waste water

• coastal zones

• Biodiversity

• Access reliability

• cycle cost

• Energy and materials

Centralized • Distributed • Combined •

Scripts

Pilot with open protocol, independent laboratory and stop conditions

Scaling after checking effect, cost, rights and off-season sustainability

Z3→Z4

Russia-India • Ganges •

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

FIELD-741 — other address space

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 16

13 Field Families × 19 Base Nodes × three states D/K/R

13 FAMILIES

19 Nodes

3 STATE

S01 Unity and Management

S02 Meaning and Values

S03 Time and cycles

S04 Energy and resources

S05 Information and data

S06 Man and Consciousness

S07 Cooperation and networks

S08 Balance and Sustainability

S09 Evolution and innovation

S10 Creation and production

S11 Navigation and strategy

S12 Life and ecology

S13 Security and integrity

N01 Subject

N02 Purpose

N03 Border

N04 Resource

N05 Signal

N06 Knowledge

N07 Solution

N08 Action

N09 Feedback

N10 Risk

N11 Trust

N12 Cooperation

N13 Infra

N14 Standard

N15 Finance

N16 Personnel

N17 Technology

N18 Wednesday

N19 Result

Diagnostics

D =.40C +.35Q +.25T

Coordination

K =.40A +.30L +.30R

Development

R =.40G +.30S +.30V

FIELD:S01:N01:D — field family / base node / work mode

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

BAL and FIELD connect crosswalk

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 17

Equal power 741 does not create identity; communication has type, condition, version and proof

MAP‑BAL‑FIELD‑0001

BAL:C09:B04:S3

FIELD

• relation: composite

• condition: swimming pool / period

• version and owner

• source and tests

• Draft → Approved

• round-trip verification

Water and hydrosphere

Nature ↔ technosphere

Global level

S12:N18:D

+ S05:N06:K

+ S10:N17:R

close ≠ exact • The compound relationship holds the formula • noMatch allow and see

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

ORION22:22 — common language of connections

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 18

22 Independent Axis ↔ 22 verifiable results from value to rights and memory

VAL • NEE • GOA • BEN

value • need • target • recipient

MEANING

DOM • OBJ • AGT • GEO • TIM

Domain • Object • Role • Territory • Time

KNOWLEDGE

SIT • IND • SCN • RSK • DEC

situation • indicator • scenario • risk • act

DECISION

CAP • PRC • INI • RES • DEL

Ability • Process • Initiative • Resource • Supply

ACTION

REC • PRV • RGT

entry • origin • rights

MEMORY

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

260

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 19

SRCh 19/260 measures the environment, not the individual

13 Standards ×14 indicators + 6 Standards ×13 indicators = 260

• 01–05 Foundation

• 06–08 Formation

• 09–12 Independence

• 13–16 Creation

• 17–19 Continuity

• conditions • possibilities • results

STANDARDS

INDICATORS

The dignity of a person does not depend on the profile, code, indicator or score.

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Book of Kins — symbolic memory of 20×13

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 20

The 260 symbolic coordinates are kept separate from the 260 SRCh measurement indicators

13 tones

Coordinate — interpretation language • not diagnosis • not prognosis • not grounds for legal decision

20 Archetypes

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

The same number does not mean the same system.

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 21

Master document preserves individual namespaces, evidence, and valid applications

KONA

Ethical framework

Not physical laws.

22:22

ORION

axles ↔ results

Not a mystical code.

19/260

SRCh

Measurement of environment

not personality rating

20×13

Keena

Symbolic Memory

not forecast

741

BAL

19×13×3

Not the final score.

741

FIELD

13×19×D/K/R

not identical BAL

Corpus

Files and Versions

Not the typology of people

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

E0-E4 separate meaning from proof

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 22

The approval status determines what can be published, piloted and scaled

Symbol / position

publication with marking

Hypothesis

Design Verification

Internal certificate

Limited pilot

Independent confirmation

Controlled Scaling

Reproduced practice

Operation and monitoring

A critical decision requires sufficient evidence for a specific risk — not the maximum number of publications.

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

164

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 23

All 344 works were included in the unified register

Completeness 100%: 344 unique paths, 344 unique Library ID, no missing entries

159

PPTX

DOCX

PDF

XLSX

47.67%

46.22%

5.52%

0.58%

138 The main pairs DOCX↔PPTX • 12 Thematic families • 29 Top Folders

SHA‑256 Registry: 2b90bf50884a3abde93fe57c0346ed4af89eb912d1d7e6a55f23a214b42de840

The basic image 344 is not overwritten by new versions - a new release is added by a separate manifesto.

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

12 families give the body navigation

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 24

Category helps to see the portfolio, but does not replace the substantive examination of each work

F01 Metasystems and ORION

F07 Social cooperation

F02 Management and security

F08 Culture and Meanings

F03 Economics and Balance Sheets

F09 Heritage and Archives

F04 Industry and transport

F10 Science and Universal Laws

F05 Data, AI and calculations

F11 Territories and partnerships

F06 Ecology and biocenoses

F12 Office supplies

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

138

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 25

Pairs and versions retain the identity of the work

Format, copy, and edit do not become new work without a decision on a separate archival identity.

135

The main pairs DOCX↔PPTX

High confidence pair

Pairs for manual inspection

21/26

unpaired DOCX / PPTX

groups of copies or versions

Files with version markers

Byte duplicates are not approved without content checksums.

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Three flowers start with three pilots.

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 26

Pilots test architecture on humans, civilizational contours, and planetary systems

MAN / S1

CIVILIZATION / S2

PLANET / S3

Trajectory of Opportunities

Full cycle farm

Russia-India: Ganges

SRCh • SFERA • cooperation • funds

Food • Biocenosis • ECO‑PPA • GRID

hydrosphere • land use • archive

Passport environment and support without personality rating

Balance of water, soil, energy, logistics and finance

Cross-border data, recovery and verification

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Human rights are built into governance

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 27

Independent veto, appeal and prohibition of high-risk automatic ranking

HUMANITY

DECIDES

Advice Book

Owners of contours

Ethics and rights

Archive

Scientific Council

Independent audit

Prohibited: personal forecast • dignity rating • automatic decisions on rights • publication of heritage without consent

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

36 months: from registry to federation

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 28

We first record memory and rights; then we check three pilots; we scale only after an independent decision

0–2 months

2–6 months

4–9 months

6–15 months

12–24 months

24–36 months

Mandate

Profiles

Metareister

3 Pilot

Verification

Federation

344 + Borders

first 50 works

URI + Version

S1 / S2 / S3

GO / REDESIGN / HOLD / STOP

nodes + archive

Approve the Editorial Board 1.0 • fix the registry 344 • Appoint owners • Select the first 50 Work and three pilots

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 1–20

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 29

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0001

16 конов.docx

BKS-0011

Balances_as_Management_Sy…

BKS-0002

16_конов_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx

BKS-0012

Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-…

BKS-0003

16_Other OrganiserEQUILIBRIUM_pres

BKS-0013

Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-…

BKS-0004

17053bb5-09c0-44c7-98f9-0…

BKS-0014

Balansy_Rossii_1896-2026_…

BKS-0005

560b417c-9d70-46fe-b16c-a…

BKS-0015

Balansy_Rossii_1896-2026_…

PDF • F12

BKS-0006

5781f682-b846-4f41-ba8f-7…

BKS-0016

Belaya_kniga_kooperativa_…

BKS-0007

Analiz_balansov_Rossii_19…

BKS-0017

Belaya_kniga_SPECZASCHITA…

BKS-0008

Analiz_natsionalnyh_balan…

BKS-0018

Biocenozy_ECO-PPA.pptx

BKS-0009

Arkhitektura_natsionalnoy…

BKS-0019

Chelovek_Kultura_i_mirovy…

BKS-0010

Balances_as_a_System_SUR.…

BKS-0020

Chelovek_Kultura_i_mirovy…

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 21–40

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 30

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0021

Dinamicheskaya_model_bios…

BKS-0031

Ediny_stroitelny_portal_P…

BKS-0022

Dinamicheskaya_model_bios…

BKS-0032

EQUILIBRIUM_10_smyslov_Vh…

BKS-0023

Doklad_SPECZASCHITA_Gosso…

BKS-0033

EQUILIBRIUM_AI_self_asses…

BKS-0024

Doktrina_Pobedy_2026_2036…

BKS-0034

GASMP_EQUILIBRIUM_Present…

BKS-0025

ECO-PPA_001_Matrix_Calen...

BKS-0035

GASMP_EQUILIBRIUM_Strateg…

XLSX • F03

BKS-0026

ECO-PPA_arkhitektura_nats…

BKS-0036

GIDROSFERA_EQUILIBRIUM_St…

BKS-0027

ECO-PPA_main_map_A0.pdf

BKS-0037

GIDROSFERA_EQUILIBRIUM_St…

PDF • F03

BKS-0028

Edinaya_Nauka_Prirodnyh_S…

BKS-0038

Ideal_Document_Flow_SUR.d…

BKS-0029

Edinaya_Nauka_Prirodnyh_S…

BKS-0039

Ideal_Document_Flow_SUR.p…

BKS-0030

Ediny_stroitelny_portal_K…

BKS-0040

Karta_validatsii_EQUILIBR…

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 41–60

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 31

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0041

Karta_validatsii_SK42_EQU…

BKS-0051

Nauka_Ciklov_EQVILIBRIUM.…

BKS-0042

Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohrane…

BKS-0052

Nauka_Ciklov_EQVILIBRIUM.…

BKS-0043

Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohrane…

BKS-0053

NMA_Nematerialnye_aktivy_…

BKS-0044

Konsolidatsiya_stran_Prez…

BKS-0054

NMA_Nematerialnye_aktivy_…

BKS-0045

Konsolidatsiya_stran_Stra…

BKS-0055

Novaya_mirovaya_finansova…

BKS-0046

Manifest_10_smyslov_EQILI…

BKS-0056

Novaya_mirovaya_finansova…

BKS-0047

MERA_Standard_PPA_2017_RU…

BKS-0057

Nuclear_Mathematics_EQUIL…

PDF • F10

BKS-0048

Ministerstva_Uchrezhdeniy…

BKS-0058

Nuclear_Mathematics_EQUIL…

BKS-0049

Ministerstva_Uchrezhdeniy…

BKS-0059

PacifiCorp_Renewable_Ener…

BKS-0050

My_na_Gossovete.docx

BKS-0060

Paket_Dyuminu_Gossovet_Ba…

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 61–80

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 32

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0061

Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.do…

BKS-0071

Prodovolstvennaya_bezopas…

BKS-0062

Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.pp…

BKS-0072

Prodovolstvennaya_bezopas…

BKS-0063

Pismo_A_R_Belousovu_Doktr…

BKS-0073

RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy.do…

BKS-0064

Portaly_stikhiy_Gorod_Sob…

BKS-0074

RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy_pr…

BKS-0065

PPA_annotated_full_transl…

BKS-0075

RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy_pr…

BKS-0066

Prezentaciya_Doktrina_Pob…

BKS-0076

Rebra_svyazannosti_SOYUZ7…

BKS-0067

Prezentaciya_SPECZASCHITA…

BKS-0077

Rebra_svyazannosti_SOYUZ7…

BKS-0068

Prezentatsiya_Dyuminu_Gos…

BKS-0078

Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya…

BKS-0069

Prikladnaya_teoriya_potok…

BKS-0079

Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya…

BKS-0070

Prikladnaya_teoriya_potok…

BKS-0080

Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya…

PDF • F09

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 81–100

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 33

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0081

Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya…

BKS-0091

SFERA_banking_financial_s…

BKS-0082

Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.…

BKS-0092

SFERA_Grant_Conveyor.pptx

BKS-0083

Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.…

BKS-0093

SFERA_Mir_bez_granits.docx

BKS-0084

Rossiya_Karta_Probuzhdeni…

BKS-0094

SFERA_Mir_bez_granits_pre…

BKS-0085

Rossiya_Karta_Probuzhdeni…

BKS-0095

SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.d…

BKS-0086

Schetnaia_kniga_Arhetipy_…

BKS-0096

SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.p…

BKS-0087

Schetnaia_kniga_Arhetipy_…

BKS-0097

SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.p…

BKS-0088

Schetnaya_sistema_Equilib…

BKS-0098

Simvolicheskaya_sistema_i…

BKS-0089

Schetnaya_sistema_Equilib…

BKS-0099

Simvolicheskaya_sistema_i…

BKS-0090

SFERA_banking_financial_s…

BKS-0100

Sistema_fondov_Lichnye_i_…

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 101–120

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 34

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0101

Sistema_fondov_Lichnye_i_…

BKS-0111

SUR_810_Strategic_Present…

BKS-0102

Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_O…

BKS-0112

SUR_Culture_New_Contribution....

BKS-0103

Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_O…

BKS-0113

SUR_Culture_New_Contribution....

PDF • F01

BKS-0104

Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_O…

BKS-0114

Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Un…

BKS-0105

SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Ko…

BKS-0115

Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Un…

BKS-0106

SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Ko…

BKS-0116

Tehnologicheskoe_lico_Ros…

BKS-0107

SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Ko…

BKS-0117

Tehnologicheskoe_lico_Ros…

BKS-0108

SPECZASCHITA_KIBALION.docx

BKS-0118

Teoriya_Uzlov_SOYUZ741.do…

BKS-0109

SPECZASCHITA_KIBALION.pptx

BKS-0119

Teoriya_Uzlov_SOYUZ741.pp…

BKS-0110

SUR_810_Master_Document.d…

BKS-0120

UCC_in_supersystem_ECO-PPA_...

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 121–140

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 35

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0121

UCC_in_supersystem_ECO-PPA_...

BKS-0131

Vychislitelnyi_GRID_Metak…

BKS-0122

Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychisli…

BKS-0132

Vychislitelnyi_GRID_Metak…

BKS-0123

Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychisli…

BKS-0133

Yadernaya_matematika_i_Ar…

BKS-0124

Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychisli…

BKS-0134

Yadernaya_matematika_i_Ar…

BKS-0125

Upravlenie_stranoi_Goskor…

BKS-0135

Academic_infrastructure...

BKS-0126

Upravlenie_stranoi_Goskor…

BKS-0136

Archive_save_heritage...

BKS-0127

Vozrozhdenie_Zemli_Prezen…

BKS-0137

Archive_save_heritage...

BKS-0128

Vozrozhdenie_Zemli_Strate…

BKS-0138

Archive_save_heritage...

BKS-0129

Vsemirnye_Hristianskie_Ig…

BKS-0139

Archive_save_heritage...

BKS-0130

Vsemirnye_Hristianskie_Ig…

BKS-0140

Atlas_social_data_E...

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 141–160

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 36

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0141

Atlas_social_data_E...

BKS-0151

Виды_PPA_презентация.pptx

BKS-0142

White_book_cooperative_r...

BKS-0152

External_circuit_ECO_PPA_26...

BKS-0143

Biocenosis_Air_Concept...

BKS-0153

External_Package_ECO_PPA_260...

BKS-0144

Biocenosis_Air_Presentation...

BKS-0154

WATER_Portal_five_natural_E...

BKS-0145

Biocenosis_Land use...

BKS-0155

WATER_Portal_five_natural_E...

BKS-0146

Biocenosis_Land use...

BKS-0156

AIR_Portal_five_verse...

BKS-0147

Biocenose_point_monitor...

BKS-0157

AIR_Portal_five_verse...

BKS-0148

Biocenose_point_monitor...

BKS-0158

Rebirth_Earth_Academy...

BKS-0149

Biocenoses_EQUILIBRIUM_pre...

BKS-0159

World_Portal_Cinema_SFE...

BKS-0150

Types_PPA_classification_and_...

BKS-0160

World_Portal_Cinema_SFE...

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 161–180

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 37

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0161

Hydrorobotics_SPEZZA...

BKS-0171

Doctrine_Victory_EQUILIBRI...

BKS-0162

Hydrorobotics_SPEZZA...

BKS-0172

Doctrine_Victory_EQUILIBRI...

PDF • F02

BKS-0163

Hydrorobotics_SPEZZA...

BKS-0173

Doctrine_Victory_EQUILIBRI...

BKS-0164

Hydrorobotics_SPEZZA...

BKS-0174

Advanced_primary_con...

BKS-0165

Hypergraphs_EQUILIBRIUM.do...

BKS-0175

Single_Construction_Port...

BKS-0166

Hypergraphs_EQUILIBRIUM_chi...

BKS-0176

Single_Construction_Port...

BKS-0167

State_program...

BKS-0177

EUT_Unified...

BKS-0168

State_program...

BKS-0178

EUT_Unified...

BKS-0169

Contract_rents_PPA_Rent_Fr...

BKS-0179

LAND_Portal_five_natural_...

BKS-0170

Contract_rents_sets...

BKS-0180

LAND_Portal_five_natural_...

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 181–200

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 38

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0181

IAC_concept_for_first...

BKS-0191

CAWOT+BS_QQQ_presentation_Dl...

BKS-0182

IAC_EQUILIBRIUM_Social...

BKS-0192

Book_Universal_Law...

BKS-0183

IAC_EQUILIBRIUM_Social...

BKS-0193

Book_Universal_Law...

BKS-0184

IAC_EQUILIBRIUM_Social...

BKS-0194

Консолидация_стран.docx

BKS-0185

IMASH_RAN_Strategic_to...

BKS-0195

Консолидация_стран.pptx

BKS-0186

IMASH_RAN_Strategic_to...

BKS-0196

Consolidation_Countries_Presen...

BKS-0187

Industrial_megaproject...

BKS-0197

Consolidation_Countries_Strate...

BKS-0188

Industrial_megaproject...

BKS-0198

Cooperative_Exchange_Work...

BKS-0189

Tools_Validation_Arch...

BKS-0199

Cooperative_Exchange_Work...

BKS-0190

Tools_Validation_Arch...

BKS-0200

Culture_New_Study.do...

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 201–220

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 39

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0201

Culture_New_Study.pp...

BKS-0211

MATERIALS_Ceramics...

BKS-0202

Personal_name_funds_EG...

BKS-0212

Material science_SKFE_ker...

BKS-0203

Personal_name_funds_EG...

BKS-0213

LOCATION_Single_Storage System...

BKS-0204

Materials_2_0_Rees...

BKS-0214

LOCATION_Single_Storage System...

BKS-0205

Materials_2_0_Rees...

BKS-0215

World_without_boundaries_advance...

BKS-0206

Materials_2_0_Rees...

BKS-0216

World_without_boundaries_advance...

BKS-0207

Material science_and_transp...

BKS-0217

World_without_boundaries_advance...

BKS-0208

MATERIALS_Ceramics...

BKS-0218

Narratives_and_values_ECVI...

BKS-0209

MATERIALS_Ceramics...

BKS-0219

Narratives_and_values_ECVI...

BKS-0210

MATERIALS_Ceramics...

BKS-0220

Наука_Поля_СОЮЗ-741.docx

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 221–240

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 40

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0221

National_centers_valid...

BKS-0231

ORION_22-22_Strategic...

BKS-0222

National_centers_valid...

BKS-0232

ORION_22-22_Strategic...

BKS-0223

Neuroscientist_Culture_and_Civi...

BKS-0233

Parks_Russia_and_world_City...

BKS-0224

Нейросвод_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx

BKS-0234

Parks_Russia_and_world_City...

BKS-0225

Нейросвод_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx

BKS-0235

Parks_Russia_and_world_City...

BKS-0226

The new SCF Metal...

BKS-0236

Primary_contour_report_...

BKS-0227

New_financial_system_...

BKS-0237

Pilot_ECO_PPA_260_million_dor...

BKS-0228

New_financial_system_...

BKS-0238

Planet_as_one_state...

BKS-0229

НПП_АСИ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx

BKS-0239

Planet_as_one_state...

BKS-0230

НПП_АСИ_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.pptx

BKS-0240

Planetary_Balance_and_Balance...

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 241–260

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 41

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0241

Planetary_Balance_and_Balance...

BKS-0251

Roles_Nations_OS_EQUILIBRIUM...

BKS-0242

Portal_five_natural_Estafa...

BKS-0252

Russia_Balance analysis_states...

BKS-0243

Portal_five_natural_Estafa...

BKS-0253

Russia_Balance analysis_states...

BKS-0244

Presentation_estimate_260_million...

BKS-0254

Russia_Ideal_Miroust...

BKS-0245

Trade Union_4_0_Presentation....

BKS-0255

Russia_Ideal_Miroust...

BKS-0246

Trade Union_4_0_Strategic...

BKS-0256

Russia_Ideal_Miroust...

BKS-0247

Register_741_Fields_SOYUZ-741...

BKS-0257

Russia_Master_Poem_Biot...

BKS-0248

Register_741_Fields_SOYUZ-741...

BKS-0258

Russia_Master_Poem_Biot...

BKS-0249

Register_funds_NPK_NGO_SPE...

BKS-0259

Россия_Науки_Будущего.docx

BKS-0250

Roles_Nations_OS_EQUILIBRIUM...

BKS-0260

Russia_Science_Future_Pre...

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 261–280

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 42

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0261

Россия_Новый_Уклад.docx

BKS-0271

Russian_world_targets_strategy...

BKS-0262

Россия_Новый_Уклад.pdf

BKS-0272

Self-sufficient nature...

BKS-0263

Россия_Новый_Уклад.pptx

BKS-0273

Self-sufficient nature...

BKS-0264

Russia_System_planned...

BKS-0274

Connectivity_best_project...

BKS-0265

Russia_System_planned...

BKS-0275

Connectivity_best_project...

BKS-0266

Russia_System_planned...

BKS-0276

Selenkin Alexander Gennad...

PDF • F02

BKS-0267

Russian_world_targets_strategy...

BKS-0277

System_system_ECVILIBRIOU...

BKS-0268

Russian_world_targets_strategy...

BKS-0278

Weaknesses_sides_of_country_and_re...

BKS-0269

Russian_world_targets_strategy...

BKS-0279

Estimate_260_million_ecomodules_and...

XLSX • F06

BKS-0270

Russian_world_targets_strategy...

BKS-0280

Social_marketplace_co...

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 281–300

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 43

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0281

Social_marketplace_pr...

BKS-0291

SPHERE_New_Construction_Codes...

BKS-0282

SPECSAYTA_Hydrorobotech...

BKS-0292

SPHERE_New_Construction_Codes...

BKS-0283

SPECSAYTA_Hydrorobotech...

BKS-0293

Теория_Графов_СОЮЗ741.docx

BKS-0284

SPECIALIZED_Shipbuilding_About...

BKS-0294

Theory_Counts_Soyuz741_Pre...

BKS-0285

SPECIALIZED_Shipbuilding_About...

BKS-0295

Theory_Nodes_SOYUZ741_ECVI...

BKS-0286

Standard_Development_Man...

BKS-0296

Theory_Nodes_SOYUZ741_ECVI...

BKS-0287

Standards_Development_Human...

BKS-0297

Transport and industrial_...

BKS-0288

SPHERE_single_space...

BKS-0298

Transport and industrial_...

BKS-0289

SPHERE_single_space...

BKS-0299

Universal_law_sist...

BKS-0290

SPHERE_New_Construction_Codes...

BKS-0300

Universal_law_sist...

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 301–320

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 44

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0301

_Other Organiser

BKS-0311

Evolution of_standards_and_this...

BKS-0302

Manage_Ecvil...

BKS-0312

Evolution of_standards_and_this...

BKS-0303

CHARTER NPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA …

BKS-0313

EQUILIBRIUM_Hyperloops_and_with...

PDF • F01

BKS-0304

Funds_NPC_NGO_SPECIFICITY....

BKS-0314

EQUILIBRIUM_Hyperloops_and_with...

BKS-0305

Formula_Genplan_ECVILBR...

BKS-0315

EQUILIBRIUM_Industrial...

BKS-0306

Formula_Genplan_ECVILBR...

BKS-0316

EQUILIBRIUM_Industrial...

BKS-0307

Hedging_Powers_Russia....

BKS-0317

EQUILIBRIUM_How to_collect_in...

BKS-0308

Hedging_Powers_Russia....

BKS-0318

EQUILIBRIUM_How to_collect_in...

BKS-0309

Цивилизация.docx

BKS-0319

EQUILIBRIUM_Materials...

BKS-0310

Цивилизация.pptx

BKS-0320

EQUILIBRIUM_Inter-industry...

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Register of works 321–340

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 45

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0321

EQUILIBRIUM_Inter-industry...

BKS-0331

EQUILIBRIUM_Mintrans_pres...

BKS-0322

EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Science_in...

BKS-0332

EQUILIBRIUM_Minds_ve...

BKS-0323

EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Science_P...

BKS-0333

EQUILIBRIUM_Minds_Pres...

BKS-0324

EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Nature_we...

BKS-0334

EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Economic Development...

BKS-0325

EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Nature_Apr...

BKS-0335

EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Economic Development...

BKS-0326

EQUILIBRIUM_Minpromtorg_in...

BKS-0336

EQUILIBRIUM_Minenergo_ved...

BKS-0327

EQUILIBRIUM_Minpromtorg_p...

BKS-0337

EQUILIBRIUM_Minenergo_pre...

BKS-0328

EQUILIBRIUM_Minstroy_vedo...

BKS-0338

ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_ОС_1.0.docx

BKS-0329

EQUILIBRIUM_Minstroy_pres...

BKS-0339

EQUILIBRIUM_OS_1.0_Presen...

BKS-0330

EQUILIBRIUM_Mintrans_vedo...

BKS-0340

ECO-PPA_Minigeneration_Eco...

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

344 / 344

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 46

Register of works 341–344

All identifiers are included; full names and paths are saved in notes and master document

BKS-0341

ECO-PPA_Minigeneration_Eco...

BKS-0342

Efir_Portal_five_verse_E...

BKS-0343

Efir_Portal_five_verse_E...

BASIC CORPUS IS FIXED

BKS-0344

ЭФС_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx

164 PPTX • 159 DOCX • 19 PDF • 2 XLSX

138 Steam DOCX↔PPTX • 12 Thematic families

Next step: certification of the first 50 works and launch of three pilots

Master document "Revival" · edition 1.0

Sources cited in presentation 431

  • Author's master-frame; there are no external statements on the title slide.
  • https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
  • https://www.ohchr.org/en/publications/policy-and-methodological-publications/human-rights-indicators-guide-measurement-and
  • Internal: whitebook_build/document_architecture.md
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
  • Internal: 16_конов_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx
  • https://seea.un.org/ecosystem-accounting
  • Internal: ОРИОН_22-22_Стратегическая_концепция.docx
  • Internal: whitebook_sources/16_конов_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docx
  • Internal: whitebook_build/source_extract.json
  • [Details]
  • K01 Continuity and improvement: Inherited biological, cultural, family and institutional conditions become the material for preservation, verification and improvement, rather than mechanical repetition. | Percentage of decisions based on lessons learned; availability of knowledge register; reduction of repeatability of errors.
  • K02 Will and moral choice: Will is the ability to hold on to a chosen direction by relating momentum, values, and consequences; it is not equal to rigidity and does not justify the suppression of another. | Fulfillment of voluntary commitments; sustainability of focus; ability to adjust course without abandoning the goal.
  • K03 Part-and-whole identity: Man is included in large systems; the similarity of part-and-whole is used as a metaphor for systemic connectedness, not as proof of complete identity. | Number of relationships taken into account; reduction of unforeseen external effects; completeness of the system map.
  • K04 Creation: Creation is the production of value that supports life, dignity, knowledge, beauty, trust and the ability of systems to develop. | Proven utility; satisfaction of recipients; lack of or compensation for harm.
  • K05 Similarity and environment: The environment is shaped by shared interests, attitudes, choices, algorithms, social conditions, and available opportunities, rather than mystical attraction. | Variety of reliable contacts; quality of information sources; level of psychological safety.
  • K06 Resonance and transformation: Information evokes response; maturity is not to transmit the destructive impulse further, but to transform it into understanding, boundary, or constructive action. | Reduction of escalations; speed of recovery after conflicts; proportion of conflicts with agreed solution.
  • K07 Long life horizon: The practical core is to consider consequences beyond short-term benefits and the interests of future generations; reincarnation is labeled as a worldview, not a scientifically established idea. | Proportion of long-term indicators; intergenerational equity; reversibility of risks.
  • K08 Causality and responsibility: Karma is treated as an ethical-philosophical image of causes and consequences; a person is responsible for his own contribution, but complex events have many causes. | Quality of analysis of the root causes; implementation of corrective measures; reduction of repeated incidents.
  • K09 Purpose - Dynamic matching of abilities, values, needs of the world and mature responsibility, and not a predetermined fate. | Growth of skills; sustainable participation; confirmed social value of activities.
  • K10 Thoughts affect perception, emotions and behavior, but do not materialize events directly; attention requires thought testing and choice of action. | Reduced cognitive biases; quality of decisions; compliance with the recovery regime and specialist assistance.
  • K11 Magnetism and Responsible Leadership: Influence arises from trust, competence, status, communication, and the association of people; strong influence increases responsibility and does not give the right to govern without consent. | Trust; transparency of decisions; distribution of leadership; mechanisms of feedback and revocation of authority.
  • K12 Conservation and Resource Transformation: The physical law of energy conservation is not directly transferred to emotions, money, and information; management takes into account sources, losses, conversion, and resource recovery. | Resource intensity of the result; recovery rate; waste reduction; absence of chronic burnout.
  • K13 Exchange and reciprocity: Viable systems exist through the exchange of matter, energy, information, labor, care, and trust; fair exchange takes into account contribution, need, voluntariness, and asymmetry of power. | Balance of contributions and benefits; accessibility; low level of conflicts on terms of exchange.
  • K14 Gratitude and Learning: Gratitude helps to notice support and meaning, but does not require to call harm good and is compatible with boundaries and the demand for justice. | Culture of recognition; retention of participants; speed of learning; implementation of restorative measures.
  • K15 Giving and social contribution: Giving is the voluntary direction of time, knowledge, means or concern for the development of others and the common good without guarantee of personal reward. | Confirmed effect; transparency; growth of independence; sustainability of participation.
  • K16 Replacement, Transition and Renewal: Living systems retain identity through renewal; transition requires distinguishing between what to complete, what to preserve and what to experience. | Speed of safe adaptation; share of completed commitments; safety of critical functions.
  • Internal: whitebook_sources/Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Unifikatsiya_741.docx
  • Internal: whitebook_build/assets/planetary_lotus_3x19x13.svg
  • C01 Humans and demography: Sustainable reproduction of a healthy and prosperous population.
  • C02 Health and rehabilitation: Reducing disease burden and restoring human function.
  • C03 Education and Talents: Competencies are in line with development objectives, talents are revealed.
  • C04 Culture and heritage: Continuity of cultural memory in creative renewal.
  • C05 Science and technology: Independently validated technologies are brought to use.
  • C06 Industry and materials: Reliable complete production chains.
  • C07 Energy: Continuous, affordable and resource-efficient energy.
  • C08 Food and agriculture: Affordable, safe food without depleting the natural base.
  • C09 Water and hydrosphere: Reliable water supply within the pool's reproducibility.
  • C10 Ecology and biodiversity: Economic activity remains within the permissible load.
  • C11 Territory, cities and settlement: A connected system of secure settlements with equal basic access.
  • C12 Transport and logistics: Available continuous corridors with predictable delivery time.
  • C13 Digital environment, data and AI: A compatible, sovereign and secure digital environment under human control.
  • C14 Finance and investment: Financing reproduction at an acceptable price and risk.
  • C15 Work, entrepreneurship and cooperation: Productive work, equitable outcome and sustainable cooperation.
  • C16 Governance, law and trust: Predictable, responsible and contested governance.
  • C17 Safety and continuity: Acceptable risk and recovery of critical functions in a given time.
  • C18 International cooperation: Equitable diversified projects with mutual benefit.
  • C19 Long horizon: The choice of future generations and readiness for big challenges are preserved.
  • B01 Security — development
  • B02 Person to State
  • B03 Center — regions
  • B04 Nature — technosphere
  • B05 Sovereignty — Openness
  • B06 Present is the future
  • B07 Efficiency — fairness
  • B08 Labour — capital
  • B09 Competition — cooperation
  • B10 Innovations — reliability
  • B11 Digital efficiency — human sovereignty
  • B12 Tradition — Update
  • B13 Agglomeration growth — spatial connectivity
  • Internal: Белая_Книга_Судьбы_Мастер-документ_Возрождение.docx
  • Internal: Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.docx
  • Internal: Планетарный_Баланс_и_Баланс_Биосферы_ЕГ.docx
  • Internal: whitebook_sources/Реестр_741_Полей_СОЮЗ-741.docx
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/78915.html
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/78914.html
  • Internal: orion_sources/Agency for Strategic Initiatives АСИ/Стандарт_развития_Человека_СРЧ_1.0.docx
  • Internal: orion_sources/Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_Chelovechestva.docx
  • Internal: whitebook_build/registry_analysis.json
  • Internal: library_documents_registry.json
  • registry_sha256=2b90bf50884a3abde93fe57c0346ed4af89eb912d1d7e6a55f23a214b42de840
  • F01 Metasystems, classifiers and ORION: 41
  • F02 Public administration, security and doctrines: 36
  • F03 Economics, balance sheets, finance, funds and PPA: 39
  • F04 Industry, materials, construction and transport: 48
  • F05 Digital systems, data, AI and calculations: 13
  • F06 Ecology, biocenoses and natural systems: 28
  • F07 Social cooperation, people and institutions: 21
  • F08 Culture, civilization and meanings: 27
  • F09 Heritage, Archives, Memory and Media: 26
  • F10 Science, mathematics, physics and universal laws: 20
  • F11 Territories, international integration and development projects: 31
  • F12 Service, address and unrecognised materials: 14
  • Internal: Стандарт_развития_Человека_СРЧ_1.0.docx
  • Internal: Prodovolstvennaya_bezopasnost_Biocenoz_i_ferma_polnogo_cikla.docx
  • BKS-0001 | 16 конов.docx | /ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ Уникальная Россия/16 конов.docx | DOCX | F08 | libfile_13e73ac600d4819192dc82a061039310
  • BKS-0002 | 16_Other OrganiserEQUILIBRIUM.docx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia16_Other OrganiserEQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F08 | libfile_3ffc1538c2a88191bdd3d7b35b699d7d
  • BKS-0003 | 16_Other OrganiserEQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia16_Other OrganiserEQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_51c42d42c83c819198b856369e9b88c4
  • BKS-0004 | 17053bb5-09c0-44c7-98f9-0680ac4fdfc1.docx | /Report 01 August/17053bb5-09c0-44c7-98f9-0680ac4fdfc1.docx | DOCX | F12 | libfile_08172fbb8864819184cc976f1ca87582
  • BKS-0005 | 560b417c-9d70-46fe-b16c-ad67374aeb14.pdf | /560b417c-9d70-46fe-b16c-ad67374aeb14.pdf | PDF | F12 | libfile_9a5b8d14137481918a02e2285740884c
  • BKS-0006 | 5781f682-b846-4f41-ba8f-7b2d7a25b724.pptx | /Report 01 August/5781f682-b846-4f41-ba8f-7b2d7a25b724.pptx | PPTX | F12 | libfile_7d514bbbd27c8191829082a557fb4d07
  • BKS-0007 | Analiz_balansov_Rossii_1995-2025.pptx | /Balances/Analiz_balansov_Rossii_1995-2025.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_70fc4387d3448191901b225e9129b594
  • BKS-0008 | Analiz_natsionalnyh_balansov_Rossii_1995-2025.docx | /Balances/Analiz_natsionalnyh_balansov_Rossii_1995-2025.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_b4be4abb7a9c8191873cf1a320717596
  • BKS-0009 | Arkhitektura_natsionalnoy_bezopasnosti_ECO-PPA.pptx | /Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASI/Arkhitektura_natsionalnoy_bezopasnosti_ECO-PPA.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_a5c6a19828e08191aea52ca49aae7482
  • BKS-0010 | Balances_as_a_System_SUR.docx | /Balances_as_a_System_SUR.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_aa1d9a1edad48191854fd2ac42fa88b9
  • BKS-0011 | Balances_as_Management_System_SUR.pptx | /Balances_as_Management_System_SUR.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_9fdc3af9cbb48191888ef22fd69089df
  • BKS-0012 | Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_EQUILIBRIUM_Sinhronizatsiya.docx | /Balansy/Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_EQUILIBRIUM_Sinhronizatsiya.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_8425f86d72d8819181501354dbd6a2d3
  • BKS-0013 | Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_EQUILIBRIUM_Sinhronizatsiya.pptx | /Balansy/Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_EQUILIBRIUM_Sinhronizatsiya.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_409692e7f66881919e84b4580f2f8f64
  • BKS-0014 | Balansy_Rossii_1896-2026_Akademiya_nauk.docx | /Balances/Balansy_Rossii_1896-2026_Akademiya_nauk.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_8d6ca4445af0819193a15eae72dbc930
  • BKS-0015 | Balansy_Rossii_1896-2026_Akademiya_nauk.pptx | /Balances/Balansy_Rossii_1896-2026_Akademiya_nauk.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_8e50dea2153c819191d4ea5fa4f14a7b
  • BKS-0016 | Belaya_kniga_kooperativa_SPECZASCHITA_v1.docx | /Report 01 August/Belaya_kniga_kooperativa_SPECZASCHITA_v1.docx | DOCX | F07 | libfile_958c7d5c7a9081918d9d786b3e21fd00
  • BKS-0017 | Belaya_kniga_SPECZASCHITA_v1.pptx | /Report 01 August/Belaya_kniga_SPECZASCHITA_v1.pptx | PPTX | F12 | libfile_aed2e7926bbc8191a2048c1919ca40da
  • BKS-0018 | Biocenozy_ECO-PPA.pptx | /Report SPECZASHCHITA State Council/Biocenozy_ECO-PPA.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_be756cf300488191955a414373127478
  • BKS-0019 | Chelovek_Kultura_i_mirovye_balansy.docx | /Chelovek_Kultura_i_mirovye_balansy.docx | DOCX | F08 | libfile_1b374c5855cc81918a6a99c939790b85
  • BKS-0020 | Chelovek_Kultura_i_mirovye_balansy.pptx | /Chelovek_Kultura_i_mirovye_balansy.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_be0d67cab1e48191bf2776042ede85b2
  • BKS-0021 | Dinamicheskaya_model_biosfery_Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema_Arkhiv_naslediya.docx | /Dinamicheskaya_model_biosfery_Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema_Arkhiv_naslediya.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_7c7a7b28268081919338dbc1f6a588f7
  • BKS-0022 | Dinamicheskaya_model_biosfery_Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema_Arkhiv_naslediya.pptx | /Dinamicheskaya_model_biosfery_Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema_Arkhiv_naslediya.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_2fda12a06f3881918a53a732530f9330
  • BKS-0023 | Doklad_SPECZASCHITA_Gossovet.docx | /Report SPECZASHCHITA State Council/Doklad_SPECZASCHITA_Gossovet.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_bd9060787f8c81918ff49a3c442ac4bf
  • BKS-0024 | Doktrina_Pobedy_2026_2036.docx | /Doktrina_Pobedy_2026_2036.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_ed4a834853888191b934188d8883d4d7
  • BKS-0025 | ECO-PPA_001_Matrix_Calendar_Control.xlsx | /Contract PPA/ECO-PPA_001_Matrix_Calendar_Control.xlsx | XLSX | F03 | libfile_106d69e342688191aeb082c3af830220
  • BKS-0026 | ECO-PPA_arkhitektura_natsionalnoy_bezopasnosti.docx | Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASIECO-PPA_arkhitektura_natsionalnoy_bezopasnosti.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_c31207b031dc8191ba044b7637b10062
  • BKS-0027 | ECO-PPA_main_map_A0.pdf | /ECO-PPA_main_map_A0.pdf | PDF | F03 | libfile_5d7821f5d11481919a6c63f69f1f61c7
  • BKS-0028 | Edinaya_Nauka_Prirodnyh_Sistem.docx | /Core Mathematics Achitecture EQUILIBRIUM/Edinaya_Nauka_Prirodnyh_Sistem.docx | DOCX | F10 | libfile_4acfc2e019c48191b24cc50ddf9d8da8
  • BKS-0029 | Edinaya_Nauka_Prirodnyh_Sistem.pptx | /Core Mathematics Achitecture EQUILIBRIUM/Edinaya_Nauka_Prirodnyh_Sistem.pptx | PPTX | F10 | libfile_c111b1c02d54819193ad1cef83dd518b
  • BKS-0030 | Ediny_stroitelny_portal_Kontseptsiya.docx | /Ediny_stroitelny_portal_Kontseptsiya.docx | DOCX | F05 | libfile_e650d13e83648191b556863279abe411
  • BKS-0031 | Ediny_stroitelny_portal_Prezentatsiya.pptx | /Ediny_stroitelny_portal_Prezentatsiya.pptx | PPTX | F05 | libfile_9d0e7f36b6508191ae4c7b21d2a2bfa8
  • BKS-0032 | EQUILIBRIUM_10_smyslov_Vhozhdenie_v_Realnost.pptx | /36/EQUILIBRIUM_10_smyslov_Vhozhdenie_v_Realnost.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_03f9a02654f48191adeddf18b0c4fee1
  • BKS-0033 | EQUILIBRIUM_AI_self_assessment.docx | /Core Mathematics Achitecture EQUILIBRIUM/EQUILIBRIUM_AI_self_assessment.docx | DOCX | F10 | libfile_a92a898614d08191b1a013aa180b800f
  • BKS-0034 | GASMP_EQUILIBRIUM_Presentation.pptx | /Kladovochka/GASMP_EQUILIBRIUM_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_bb5f3959b1c8819186176873edfe50e9
  • BKS-0035 | GASMP_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docx | /Kladovochka/GASMP_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_c94f902679748191bdc12fe86eb9e53d
  • BKS-0036 | GIDROSFERA_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docx | /ORION22:22/GIDROSFERA_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_7567fbd500748191bb45badb591899d6
  • BKS-0037 | GIDROSFERA_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_prezentatsiya.pptx | /ORION22:22/GIDROSFERA_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_prezentatsiya.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_123b8b58aabc81919657e0e4c5e27092
  • BKS-0038 | Ideal_Document_Flow_SUR.docx | /Ideal_Document_Flow_SUR.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_29544ca9c45c819186ed706c74915cab
  • BKS-0039 | Ideal_Document_Flow_SUR.pptx | /Ideal_Document_Flow_SUR.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_26a72e9c1d4c81919013d7f8c28b1c1f
  • BKS-0040 | Karta_validatsii_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /Social Cooperation/Karta_validatsii_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F07 | libfile_5f723c60387c8191a7a740e324ac9014
  • BKS-0041 | Karta_validatsii_SK42_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /Social Cooperation/Karta_validatsii_SK42_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F07 | libfile_bca3d3aaebec8191b0c7276a05688db3
  • BKS-0042 | Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_Chelovechestva.docx | /Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_Chelovechestva.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_6175c5245f488191abc8c770b4313101
  • BKS-0043 | Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_Chelovechestva.pptx | /Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_Chelovechestva.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_3ff790cd8ed88191bc3a9ca11caeae79
  • BKS-0044 | Konsolidatsiya_stran_Prezentatsiya.pptx | /Konsolidatsiya_stran_Prezentatsiya.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_677a615fcbac819181729adef3de489d
  • BKS-0045 | Konsolidatsiya_stran_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docx | /Konsolidatsiya_stran_Strategicheskaya_kontseptsiya.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_39ed76cebcd4819199bd6d2b139ebeb0
  • BKS-0046 | Manifest_10_smyslov_EQILIBRIUM.docx | /36/Manifest_10_smyslov_EQILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F08 | libfile_1598cca42c788191b0f51da6203ef4ff
  • BKS-0047 | MERA_Standard_PPA_2017_RU_full_translation.docx | /Contract PPA/MERA_Standard_PPA_2017_RU_full_translation.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_ed06d01f8b8c81919ed52e4d8214e9fd
  • BKS-0048 | Ministerstva_Uchrezhdeniya_Mezhotraslevoi_Balans_Smysly_2026.docx | /Ministerstva_Uchrezhdeniya_Mezhotraslevoi_Balans_Smysly_2026.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_948daa83f2b88191ac28dd3921f01f52
  • BKS-0049 | Ministerstva_Uchrezhdeniya_Mezhotraslevoi_Balans_Smysly_2026.pptx | /Ministerstva_Uchrezhdeniya_Mezhotraslevoi_Balans_Smysly_2026.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_2b4acc74452c8191988ba6504f425d5a
  • BKS-0050 | My_na_Gossovete.docx | /Report SPECZASHCHITA State Council/My_na_Gossovete.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_c5d951c3ff5481919705a15cf3b01bcb
  • BKS-0051 | Nauka_Ciklov_EQVILIBRIUM.docx | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/Nauka_Ciklov_EQVILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_07546e4ff20881919dbc9622d702acfe
  • BKS-0052 | Nauka_Ciklov_EQVILIBRIUM.pptx | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/Nauka_Ciklov_EQVILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_c321e00ae3848191adce13b98e600ba5
  • BKS-0053 | NMA_Nematerialnye_aktivy_master.docx | /Machine Science/NMA_Nematernialnye_aktivy_master.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_70e29ffad3f08191b733f66fb3128e92
  • BKS-0054 | NMA_Nematerialnye_aktivy_presentation.pptx | /Machine Science/NMA_Nematernialnye_aktivy_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_a3c11b6102a48191be95bfa9ab14b75f
  • BKS-0055 | Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema.docx | /Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_275d1a7f96a881918603ba36d4825d34
  • BKS-0056 | Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema.pptx | /Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_e8cf68d08be48191b1c5ac3f352c257b
  • BKS-0057 | Nuclear_Mathematics_EQUILIBRIUM_AI.pdf | /Core Mathematics Achitecture EQUILIBRIUM/Nuclear_Mathematics_EQUILIBRIUM_AI.pdf | PDF | F10 | libfile_724f352a73e48191abb03de0c935c6a8
  • BKS-0058 | Nuclear_Mathematics_EQUILIBRIUM_AI.pptx | /Core Mathematics Achitecture EQUILIBRIUM/Nuclear_Mathematics_EQUILIBRIUM_AI.pptx | PPTX | F10 | libfile_ea75d1290dc48191ae8dc90b02b6921e
  • BKS-0059 | PacifiCorp_Renewable_Energy_PPA_RU_full_translation.docx | /Contract PPA/PacifiCorp_Renewable_Energy_PPA_RU_full_translation.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_da0507049b1c8191a06fd486c84a4b21
  • BKS-0060 | Paket_Dyuminu_Gossovet_Balansy_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.docx | /Balances/Paket_Dyuminu_Gossovet_Balansy_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_480c9814f1408191b726c12f59319d02
  • BKS-0061 | Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.docx | /Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.docx | DOCX | F12 | libfile_43b65e0d6fe08191989c745bbf0cb661
  • BKS-0062 | Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.pptx | /Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.pptx | PPTX | F12 | libfile_3e470b6328008191b02ccb0d33aa049e
  • BKS-0063 | Pismo_A_R_Belousovu_Doktrina_Pobedy_Strategicheskie_balansy.docx | /Letters/Pismo_A_R_Belousovu_Doktrina_Pobedy_Strategicheskie_balansy.docx | DOCX | F12 | libfile_ba98aabc08008191b53d7073e48e2d30
  • BKS-0064 | Portaly_stikhiy_Gorod_Sobytiy.pptx | /City Events/Portal_stikhiy_City_Sobytiy.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_4224540a97688191ac4278f5c9a0e548
  • BKS-0065 | PPA_annotated_full_translation_RU.docx | /Contract PPA/PPA_annotated_full_translation_RU.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_7b99920ffa188191ae3e6fc8749b3d97
  • BKS-0066 | Prezentaciya_Doktrina_Pobedy_A_R_Belousovu.pptx | /Letters/Prezentaciya_Doktrina_Pobedy_A_R_Belousovu.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_cf78780269dc81918b5f0f7d56d4a62f
  • BKS-0067 | Prezentaciya_SPECZASCHITA_Gossovet.pptx | /Report SPECZASHCHITA State Council/Prezentaciya_SPECZASCHITA_Gossovet.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_e74e121c18b48191af592ef2e5458a73
  • BKS-0068 | Prezentatsiya_Dyuminu_Gossovet_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.pptx | /Balances/Prezentatsiya_Dyuminu_Gossovet_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_3235b05c33fc8191867f7a5454fe181b
  • BKS-0069 | Prikladnaya_teoriya_potokov_EQ.docx | /New Physics/Prikladnaya_teoriya_potokov_EQ.docx | DOCX | F10 | libfile_fd21ee5c8b688191ac2c8077efee4e5b
  • BKS-0070 | Prikladnaya_teoriya_potokov_EQ.pptx | /New Physics/Prikladnaya_teoriya_potokov_EQ.pptx | PPTX | F10 | libfile_cdab3a6aba208191af9ab5d834f47057
  • BKS-0071 | Prodovolstvennaya_bezopasnost_Biocenoz_i_ferma_polnogo_cikla.docx | /Prodovolstvennaya_bezopasnost_Biocenoz_i_ferma_polnogo_cikla.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_b2f18871c578819184e96a990101c304
  • BKS-0072 | Prodovolstvennaya_bezopasnost_Biocenoz_i_ferma_polnogo_cikla.pptx | /Prodovolstvennaya_bezopasnost_Biocenoz_i_ferma_polnogo_cikla.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_a5c4e03bbb3c8191a3e4a551b1d98980
  • BKS-0073 | RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy.docx | /City Events/RD_model_City_Sobytiy.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_f68790f8e47081918445fc3df420454e
  • BKS-0074 | RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy_presentation.pdf | /City Events/RD_model_City_Sobytiy_presentation.pdf | PDF | F11 | libfile_b41004f6652481918bad6591e637ef6f
  • BKS-0075 | RD_model_Gorod_Sobytiy_presentation.pptx | /City Events/RD_model_City_Sobytiy_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_19723a2e12a08191a6e5aefb3556609a
  • BKS-0076 | Rebra_svyazannosti_SOYUZ741.docx | /Field Theory/Rebra_svyazannosti_SOYUZ741.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_8e4df81680548191a630ea697fd111f7
  • BKS-0077 | Rebra_svyazannosti_SOYUZ741.pptx | /Field Theory/Rebra_svyazannosti_SOYUZ741.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_c92d0c2866788191a18e859d51ca30c1
  • BKS-0078 | Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master(1).docx | /Machine Science/Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master(1).docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_731c120131dc8191b5b51b700870eacb
  • BKS-0079 | Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master.docx | /Machine Science/Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_a6f032ede8b0819196121f9f1819b4ee
  • BKS-0080 | Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master.pdf | /Machine Science/Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_master.pdf | PDF | F09 | libfile_7dda43e09f8c8191b896bc0a63274c83
  • BKS-0081 | Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_presentation.pptx | /Machine Science/Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_a9e9a4c84cfc819185dabd9276e334ee
  • BKS-0082 | Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.docx | /Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_3ce1544b8c148191b68ba33dfe6189ec
  • BKS-0083 | Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.pptx | /Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_4631826b2fb48191b1a050c8335d82a3
  • BKS-0084 | Rossiya_Karta_Probuzhdeniya_Master_Document.docx | /Rossiya_Karta_Probuzhdeniya_Master_Document.docx | DOCX | F08 | libfile_2fbf877968d88191b383a5e7ea951b98
  • BKS-0085 | Rossiya_Karta_Probuzhdeniya_Strategic_Presentation.pptx | /Rossiya_Karta_Probuzhdeniya_Strategic_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_2ea1426e89f88191a094d2cd2d199e1c
  • BKS-0086 | Schetnaia_kniga_Arhetipy_i_cikly.docx | /Schetnaia_kniga_Arhetipy_i_cikly.docx | DOCX | F05 | libfile_6cd032084a58819197a1f885bddfc5eb
  • BKS-0087 | Schetnaia_kniga_Arhetipy_i_cikly.pptx | /Schetnaia_kniga_Arhetipy_i_cikly.pptx | PPTX | F05 | libfile_e83d0666a6bc81919825fb5f6567ae59
  • BKS-0088 | Schetnaya_sistema_Equilibrium.docx | /Schetnaya_sistema_Equilibrium.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_055c9e34a4c88191b8f5dedb92585e8c
  • BKS-0089 | Schetnaya_sistema_Equilibrium.pptx | /Schetnaya_sistema_Equilibrium.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_f87016c563f08191868bf97b1f779711
  • BKS-0090 | SFERA_banking_financial_system.docx | /Bank PPP COOPERATIVE BANKS AND SOCIAL BANK/SFERA_banking_financial_system.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_810b68fa060881918acf89852dc99401
  • BKS-0091 | SFERA_banking_financial_system.pptx | /Bank PPP COOPERATIVE BANKS AND SOCIAL BANK/SFERA_banking_financial_system.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_ea39e69a8df48191bb1676e95dfe2837
  • BKS-0092 | SFERA_Grant_Conveyor.pptx | /City Events/SFERA_Grant_Conveyor.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_68583b2357bc81918a49f257a30f25e4
  • BKS-0093 | SFERA_Mir_bez_granits.docx | /World Without Borders/SFERA_Mir_bez_granits.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_ca026a1430788191bf14245d3b60c926
  • BKS-0094 | SFERA_Mir_bez_granits_presentation.pptx | /World Without Borders/SFERA_Mir_bez_granits_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_27e122c69efc8191a93fd4fc2177d501
  • BKS-0095 | SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.docx | /City Events/SFERA_SMI_City_Sobytiy.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_a5c7190964408191a9bc92197cda2ce2
  • BKS-0096 | SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.pdf | /City Events/SFERA_SMI_City_Sobytiy.pdf | PDF | F11 | libfile_2c7bd3d042748191af8a007cd51a1413
  • BKS-0097 | SFERA_SMI_Gorod_Sobytiy.pptx | /City Events/SFERA_SMI_City_Sobytiy.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_ebd1ee58e3d88191b4663f8bb8bfe8dc
  • BKS-0098 | Simvolicheskaya_sistema_i_yazyki.docx | /Simvolicheskaya_sistema_i_yazyki.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_65d99057ea0c8191984fc32bf62ea4e5
  • BKS-0099 | Simvolicheskaya_sistema_i_yazyki.pptx | /Simvolicheskaya_sistema_i_yazyki.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_8f9d874626bc8191a61f0d76d3fe735e
  • BKS-0100 | Sistema_fondov_Lichnye_i_imennye_fondy_i_banki.docx | /Sistema_fondov_Lichnye_i_imennye_fondy_i_banki.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_199ac1e116a48191b4fe5f1d83bc75d6
  • BKS-0101 | Sistema_fondov_Lichnye_i_imennye_fondy_i_banki.pptx | /Sistema_fondov_Lichnye_i_imennye_fondy_i_banki.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_d5616a5ab5f881918d3ee39131d78bca
  • BKS-0102 | Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.docx | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_3f22b99b5ce08191a2dd83cb1482a755
  • BKS-0103 | Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.pdf | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.pdf | PDF | F01 | libfile_30f3cf9683748191823639fbace714d6
  • BKS-0104 | Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.pptx | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_7d52e71933648191af2be6d6baca537c
  • BKS-0105 | SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Kosmoritmologiya.docx | /Cibalion/SPECZASCHITA_Archeometr_Kosmoritmologiya.docx | DOCX | F08 | libfile_4b9e3ca8fa088191ac27c82559b4a72e
  • BKS-0106 | SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Kosmoritmologiya.pptx | /Cibalion/SPECZASCHITA_Archeometr_Kosmoritmologiya.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_f5932a216b508191b6000cf9cf43b86b
  • BKS-0107 | SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Kosmoritmologiya_repeat.pptx | /Cibalion/SPECZASCHITA_Arheometr_Kosmoritmologiya_repeat.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_183f9f9718188191af904f119a6a1fb0
  • BKS-0108 | SPECZASCHITA_KIBALION.docx | /Kybalion/SPECZASCHITA_KIBALION.docx | DOCX | F08 | libfile_359f2d49264881919dccc816805ab00b
  • BKS-0109 | SPECZASCHITA_KIBALION.pptx | /Kybalion/SPECZASCHITA_KIBALION.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_17f8da7d3c488191a8fe578fa2ad7e1c
  • BKS-0110 | SUR_810_Master_Document.docx | /SUR_810_Master_Document.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_9e9a0f6ba2fc8191a179b9d4f499823e
  • BKS-0111 | SUR_810_Strategic_Presentation.pptx | /SUR_810_Strategic_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_6d2e532561d8819194c6f0da378b56cb
  • BKS-0112 | SUR_Culture_New_Conclusion.docx | /SUR/SUR_Culture_New_Conclusion.docx | DOCX | F08 | libfile_6cbf9d903c648191a4cd2d7da442bbd0
  • BKS-0113 | SUR_Culture_New_Contribution.pptx | /SUR/SUR_Culture_New_Contribution.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_433918b3cc208191873ffdf00d7a5c0b
  • BKS-0114 | Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Unifikatsiya_741.docx | /Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Unifikatsiya_741.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_b621b343b05c8191ad9bcf91ab0a060f
  • BKS-0115 | Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Unifikatsiya_741.pptx | /Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Unifikatsiya_741.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_05d8d6a7bb7481918dd5689d8f68f5d1
  • BKS-0116 | Tehnologicheskoe_lico_Rossii_Politeh.pptx | /Letters/Tehnologicheskoe_lico_Rossii_Politeh.pptx | PPTX | F12 | libfile_6472cf22410c8191a9518503486e43d4
  • BKS-0117 | Tehnologicheskoe_lico_Rossii_Politeh_light.pptx | /Letters/Tehnologicheskoe_lico_Rossii_Politeh_light.pptx | PPTX | F12 | libfile_06027755c67c819189e334cce9f87cd2
  • BKS-0118 | Teoriya_Uzlov_SOYUZ741.docx | /Field Theory/Teoriya_Uzlov_SOYUZ741.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_40d2f9041e68819196112358cc568a64
  • BKS-0119 | Teoriya_Uzlov_SOYUZ741.pptx | /Field Theory/Teoriya_Uzlov_SOYUZ741.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_84965a1ccac0819183873a6064fac1f1
  • BKS-0120 | UCC_in_supersystem_ECO-PPA_EQUILIBRIUM_EUT.docx | /Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASI/UCC_in_supersystem_ECO-PPA_EQUILIBRIUM_EUT.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_df65f626706c819188642e69081f281f
  • BKS-0121 | UCC_in_supersystem_ECO-PPA_EQUILIBRIUM_EUT.pptx | /Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASI/UCC_in_supersystem_ECO-PPA_EQUILIBRIUM_EUT.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_d04adc12cf4c8191bc1961d9819837da
  • BKS-0122 | Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_master.docx | /Machine Science/Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_master.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_90c1243028f081919d09ab6e0265335d
  • BKS-0123 | Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_master.pdf | /Machine Science/Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_master.pdf | PDF | F04 | libfile_fc5f295c1a108191a3669c8fc9783acd
  • BKS-0124 | Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_presentation.pptx | /Machine Science/Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_7a4ee72081f48191aa46b12fc86f2f6a
  • BKS-0125 | Upravlenie_stranoi_Goskorporatsii_SUR.docx | /Upravlenie_stranoi_Goskorporatsii_SUR.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_22576c10facc8191baa9f89457a1b924
  • BKS-0126 | Upravlenie_stranoi_Goskorporatsii_SUR.pptx | /Upravlenie_stranoi_Goskorporatsii_SUR.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_1fa56441df8c8191b0c0e6f214d84e18
  • BKS-0127 | Vozrozhdenie_Zemli_Prezentatsiya.pptx | /Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASI/Vozrozhdenie_Zemli_Prezentatsiya.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_04ef4de4dd548191a132c517efc7a7b8
  • BKS-0128 | Vozrozhdenie_Zemli_Strategicheskaya_doktrina.docx | /Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASI/Vozrozhdenie_Zemli_Strategicheskaya_doctrina.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_5cf053ea4f388191a2440c0edeff05dd
  • BKS-0129 | Vsemirnye_Hristianskie_Igry_Master_Document.docx | /Vsemirnye_Hristianskie_Igry_Master_Document.docx | DOCX | F08 | libfile_e036dec3a99881919c5ab483bdfb6c1a
  • BKS-0130 | Vsemirnye_Hristianskie_Igry_Presentation.pptx | /Vsemirnye_Hristianskie_Igry_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_d48972e5e4708191b2b2490fac755a99
  • BKS-0131 | Vychislitelnyi_GRID_Metakompyutery_Federativnye_bazy_Bolshie_vychisleniya.docx | /Vychislitelnyi_GRID_Metakompyutery_Federativnye_bazy_Bolshie_vychisleniya.docx | DOCX | F05 | libfile_fcf1b04ada7c8191b99506dd3db1d4ce
  • BKS-0132 | Vychislitelnyi_GRID_Metakompyutery_Federativnye_bazy_Bolshie_vychisleniya.pptx | /Vychislitelnyi_GRID_Metakompyutery_Federativnye_bazy_Bolshie_vychisleniya.pptx | PPTX | F05 | libfile_126cd543536c81918a58fbc3c89f21db
  • BKS-0133 | Yadernaya_matematika_i_Arhitektura_EKVILIBRIUM.docx | /Core Mathematics Achitecture EQUILIBRIUM/Yadernaya_matematika_i_Arhitektura_EKVILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F10 | libfile_b1a066c69d1c819182189346cc562d0c
  • BKS-0134 | Yadernaya_matematika_i_Arhitektura_EKVILIBRIUM.pptx | /Core Mathematics Achitecture EQUILIBRIUM/Yadernaya_matematika_i_Arhitektura_EKVILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F10 | libfile_e3f957b5cba88191a091b15abd474231
  • BKS-0135 | Academic_Infrastructure_Renaissance_Earth.docx | /Academic_Infrastructure_Renaissance_Earth.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_b3bff4b38d708191b29447ea322a0c1b
  • BKS-0136 | Archive_preservation_inheritance_Academic_integration.docx | /Archive_Conservation_Heritage_Academic_Integration.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_4da0c9a8f7248191b3f4dec791d2fe2f
  • BKS-0137 | Archive_preservation_inheritance_Academic_integration.pptx | /Archive_Conservation_Heritage_Academic_Integration.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_46d3eeaceb9c8191a88ce5ad9d1fca99
  • BKS-0138 | Archive_preservation_inheritance_integration_ecosystem.docx | /Kladovochka/Archive_Conservations_Heritage_Integration_Ecosystem.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_4b0e6e3efb7881919cc923519bcab82b
  • BKS-0139 | Archive_save_inheritance_integration_ecosystem.pptx | /Kladovochka/Archive_Conservations_Heritage_Integration_Ecosystem.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_3c795561ccc88191b1c08fe2e82e86ee
  • BKS-0140 | Atlas_social_data_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /IT system/Atlas_social_data_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F05 | libfile_b47b15ee83788191a9c85d72d6fa7a43
  • BKS-0141 | Atlas_social_data_EQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx | /IT system/Atlas_social_data_EQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F05 | libfile_d737b23fa934819199ce780e0b7bbb6a
  • BKS-0142 | White_book_cooperative_extended_version_1_0.docx | /Report 01 August/White_book_cooperative_extended_version_1_0.docx | DOCX | F07 | libfile_d21065f1cfe88191ba1d796f6a816295
  • BKS-0143 | Biocenosis_Air_Concept.docx | /Biocenosis_Air_Concept.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_941d86670ddc8191b94b1ce751ee8102
  • BKS-0144 | Biocenosis_Air_Presentation.pptx | /Biocenosis_Air_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_6f2f9fd658d081919cb4f2c92b8925fc
  • BKS-0145 | Biocenosis_Land use_Concept.docx | /Biocenosis_Land Use_Concept.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_ee26304128588191bc119f911a79fb1c
  • BKS-0146 | Biocenosis_Land use_Presentation.pptx | /Biocenosis_Land Use_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_bfa8673806f881919ddc2dfa81f3be4f
  • BKS-0147 | Biocenose_point_monitoring.pptx | /Report 01 August/Biocenous_point_monitoring.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_c12be7a2d73c8191893a2b90228a3e78
  • BKS-0148 | Biocenose_point_monitoring_concept.docx | /Report 01 August/Biocenous_point_monitoring_concept.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_52a6b97a74a081919a385ca26f0cc32a
  • BKS-0149 | Biocenoses_EQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx | /IT system/Biocenoses_EQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_7e3f84093f2c81919ff546841d7c9bed
  • BKS-0150 | Types_PPA_classification_and_PPA_indigenous_peoples.docx | /Contract PPA/Types_PPA_classification_and_PPA_indigenous_peoples.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_43a05ef0b2a08191a958729757bc3d23
  • BKS-0151 | Types_PPA_presentation.pptx | /Contract PPA/Types_PPA_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_51ce8836a9e88191bc1a54238cd0a3ac
  • BKS-0152 | External_Contour_ECO_PPA_260_million_watercolor_style.pptx | /Report 01 August/External_Contour_ECO_PPA_260_million_watercolor_style.pptx | PPTX | F12 | libfile_5abcc925d0bc8191a75f9722517ec3f1
  • BKS-0153 | External_Package_ECO_PPA_260_million_certain_version.pptx | /Report 01 August/External_Package_ECO_PPA_260_million_certain_version.pptx | PPTX | F12 | libfile_ec636809ed108191a208d60a01d86be1
  • BKS-0154 | WATER_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /IT system/WATER_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_01da7817f7c48191a9cd287c2ab247b4
  • BKS-0155 | WATER_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /IT system/WATER_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_f584a2b61cc88191b1fd69e73be1bf4b
  • BKS-0156 | AIR_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /IT system/AIR_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_7269a8af07208191aaecce1ce34ff8b7
  • BKS-0157 | AIR_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /IT system/AIR_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_f9d8b623e6588191bff4ce040f8820d7
  • BKS-0158 | Rebirth_Earth_Academic_Registries.pptx | /Rebirth_Earth_Academic_Registries.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_ad781cb45a648191a7fb4ec8371eb246
  • BKS-0159 | World_Portal_Cinema_Spheres.docx | /Letters/World_Portal_Cinema_Spheres.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_c7b97cd2d17c8191bdd01dfc05df32c7
  • BKS-0160 | World_Portal_Cinema_Spheres_presentation.pptx | /Letters/World_Portal_Cinema_Spheres_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_d476c744323081918c3a40d56aeda3e8
  • BKS-0161 | Hydrorobotics_Specza-Study.docx | /Engineering/Hydrorobotnics_SPECSE_research.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_7327d29c73cc8191b3db2d086bed114c
  • BKS-0162 | Hydrorobotics_Specification_research.pdf | /Engineering/Hydrorobotechnika_Specification_research.pdf | PDF | F04 | libfile_fc25e4a30a7481918ae59f9c02e478a3
  • BKS-0163 | Hydrorobotics_Specification_presentation.pdf | /Machinery/Hydrorobotnics_SPECSE_presentation.pdf | PDF | F04 | libfile_e58f55f1683c8191b543acd61ff9b324
  • BKS-0164 | Hydrorobotics_SPETS_presentation.pptx | /Engineering/Hydrorobotnics_SPECSE_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_ff2185ae14ac81918d88e17babcdf68a
  • BKS-0165 | Hypergraphs_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/HypergraphsEQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_0a61d278070c81918b08f03ba5c59427
  • BKS-0166 | Hypergraphs_EQUILIBRIUM_readable.pptx | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/HypergraphsEQUILIBRIUM_readable.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_7fc6fd0369b081919ca4d816e8c735c9
  • BKS-0167 | State_Program_Fires.docx | /IT System/State_Program_FIRE.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_c583144188108191b53aae681b41e7c8
  • BKS-0168 | State_Program_FIRE.pptx | /IT System/State_Program_Fire.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_d0d33ff42bd081919c988ce761be988c
  • BKS-0169 | Contract_rents_PPA_Rent_Framework.pptx | /Contract PPA/Contract_rents_PPA_Rent_Framework.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_0416130f09888191a34d3237008a2531
  • BKS-0170 | Contract_rents_set_type_forms.docx | /Contract PPA/Contract_rents_set_type_forms.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_9bfac46c28c881919512bece850ea779
  • BKS-0171 | Doctrine_Victory_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /Philosophy of War/Doctrine_Victory_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_5b00a42ecacc8191809a15adc2da7a3a
  • BKS-0172 | Доктрина_Победы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Презентация.pdf | /Философия Войны/Доктрина_Победы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Презентация.pdf | PDF | F02 | libfile_377bf440de608191945b7d0ebb86ffda
  • BKS-0173 | Doctrine_Victory_EQUILIBRIUM_Presentation.pptx | /Philosophy of War/Doctrine_Victory_EQUILIBRIUM_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_b6b201006d7081919f496290268cf81d
  • BKS-0174 | Augmented_primary_contour_reports_cooperative.docx | /Report 01 August/Additional_primary_contour_reports_cooperative.docx | DOCX | F12 | libfile_1962bf2cca908191b7b817e0ce6da8a3
  • BKS-0175 | Single_building_portal_398-p_presentation.pptx | /Single Construction Portal/Single_Construction Portal_398-p_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_4b5172b687a08191b444d6387428d305
  • BKS-0176 | Single_building_portal_architecture_398-p.docx | /Single construction portal/Single construction portal_architecture_398-p.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_ecfe0a8655308191819568905e5b65fb
  • BKS-0177 | EUT_Single_Unified_Technologies.docx | /New Physics/EUT_Single_Unified_Technologies.docx | DOCX | F10 | libfile_9b4503e4747c81918166a67d736ceb33
  • BKS-0178 | EUT_Single_Unified_Technology_presentation.pptx | /New Physics/EUT_Single_Unified_Technology_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F10 | libfile_64faf37c8b908191a342fd256999561d
  • BKS-0179 | LAND_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /IT system/LAND_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F05 | libfile_93bb680b83648191b3d7d7be6aa97704
  • BKS-0180 | LAND_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /IT system/LAND_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F05 | libfile_ee96d8c181a08191b905140dc5f5343a
  • BKS-0181 | IAC_concept_for_first_person.docx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/IAC_concept_for_first_person.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_514a9f3747e48191a614ec7b24489469
  • BKS-0182 | IAC_EQUILIBRIUM_Social_capital_and_institutional_design.docx | /36/IAC_EQUILIBRIUM_Social_capital_and_institutional_design.docx | DOCX | F07 | libfile_2c7b6366b7e48191a61f5db63d1ea49d
  • BKS-0183 | IAC_EQUILIBRIUM_Social_capital_and_institutional_design.pptx | /36/IAC_EQUILIBRIUM_Social_capital_and_institutional_design.pptx | PPTX | F07 | libfile_9903de6ee3a48191a296f410125d1928
  • BKS-0184 | IAC_EQUILIBRIUM_Social_capital_institutional_design_extended_presentation.pptx | /36/IAC_EQUILIBRIUM_Social_capital_institutional_design_extended_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F07 | libfile_3336134ad7648191a3c06ceaad1b822f
  • BKS-0185 | IMASH_RAN_Strategic_concept_2026-2035.pptx | /SUR/IMASH_RAN_Strategic_concept_2026-2035.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_cd8a2dade1908191847c1e2f58405fcc
  • BKS-0186 | IMASH_RAN_Strategic_concept_SUR_2026-2035.docx | /SUR/IMASH_RAN_Strategic_Concept_SUR_2026-2035.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_9b4283a18d0c81918e758fda187bf5d3
  • BKS-0187 | Industrial_megaprojects_analytical_doctrine.docx | /36/Industrial_megaprojects_analytical_doctrine.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_395e7e1a63ac8191b4a6d2f90374ba80
  • BKS-0188 | Industrial_megaprojects_presentation.pptx | /36/Industrial_megaprojects_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_599de2fa3e448191b765b9869a9c6ea5
  • BKS-0189 | Tools_validation_Archive_and_Intellectual_system.docx | /Validation Tools_Archive_and_Intellectual_System.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_248a0d978d6c819181a5b0e346d546a3
  • BKS-0190 | Tools_validation_Archive_and_Intellectual_system.pptx | /Validation Tools_Archive_and_Intellectual_System.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_591dd3f4de74819188f269faf53bc45f
  • BKS-0191 | CAVOT+BS_QQ_presentation_for_bank.pptx | /Letters/CAVOT+BS_QQ_presentation_for_bank.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_120cb92f907081919dc4aaf8eb3a2e1e
  • BKS-0192 | Book_Universal_Laws_and_Unified_Technology.docx | /New Physics/Book_Universal_Laws_and_Unified_Technology.docx | DOCX | F10 | libfile_b16a32cade848191a5883682a9c51a29
  • BKS-0193 | Book_Universal_Laws_and_Unified_Technology_Presentation.pptx | /New Physics/Book_Universal_Laws_and_Unified_Technology_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F10 | libfile_19ac3c8d97488191b0471b5b96115715
  • BKS-0194 | Consolidation_countries.docx | /Consolidation_countries.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_6b8e2d6cb0b48191ba47eb4cb193018c
  • BKS-0195 | Consolidation_countries.pptx | /Consolidation_countries.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_1cc14ed312d88191adf8706eca186d8d
  • BKS-0196 | Consolidation_Countries_Presentation.pptx | /Consolidation_countries_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_3836b54f97c481919c6075dc5c5d9f91
  • BKS-0197 | Consolidation_Countries_Strategic_Report.docx | /Consolidation_Countries_Strategic_Report.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_f9d9443be8fc8191a4a92bf393346957
  • BKS-0198 | Cooperative_Exchange_Work_Social_Cooperation.docx | /Social Cooperation/Cooperative_Exchange_Work_Social_Cooperation.docx | DOCX | F07 | libfile_381f90ba4d448191910fc6e45f027281
  • BKS-0199 | Cooperative_Exchange_Work_Social_Cooperation.pptx | /Social Cooperation/Cooperative_Exchange_Work_Social_Cooperation.pptx | PPTX | F07 | libfile_3d6c5e2b6eb081918747c98becbbb496
  • BKS-0200 | Culture_New_Study.docx | /Social Cooperation/Culture_New_Settings.docx | DOCX | F07 | libfile_2737eeb3197c81918ce4cff4f6bfc07b
  • BKS-0201 | Culture_New_Settings.pptx | /Social Cooperation/Culture_New_Settings.pptx | PPTX | F07 | libfile_0e1061ea53748191a0e8d9df9c6f75c0
  • BKS-0202 | Личные_и_именные_фонды_ЕГ.docx | /Книга кинов/Личные_и_именные_фонды_ЕГ.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_aa2c52b63b3c8191af10d6134b9b20d3
  • BKS-0203 | Личные_и_именные_фонды_ЕГ.pptx | /Книга кинов/Личные_и_именные_фонды_ЕГ.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_d519829d26d081919d97d3d08acc7d0c
  • BKS-0204 | Materials science_2_0_Register_materials_digital_passports_validation.docx | /SUR/Materials_2_0_Register_materials_digital_passports_validation.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_9ce56c413ab081919e663288658a3658
  • BKS-0205 | Materials science_2_0_Register_materials_digital_passports_validation.pdf | /SUR/Materials_2_0_Register_materials_digital_passports_validation.pdf | PDF | F04 | libfile_e8c80e6eb61c819187846c5b23a4154e
  • BKS-0206 | Materials science_2_0_Register_materials_digital_passport_validation.pptx | /SUR/Materials_2_0_Register_materials_digital_passport_validation.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_b9dd670d3bfc81919f43a6f36fea9328
  • BKS-0207 | Materials_and_transport_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /General Designer/Materials_and_transport_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_b21e1209ff948191aa1ef478cd560778
  • BKS-0208 | MATERIALS_ceramics_and_synthetic_crystals(1).pptx | /Projects EQUILIBRIUM/Materials_ceramics_and_synthetic_crystals(1).pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_f2918b1e536881918b741abaa85ae372
  • BKS-0209 | MATERIALS_ceramics_and_synthetic_crystals.docx | /SUR/Materials_ceramics_and_synthetic_crystals.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_6205de50ccf0819194c4ac000f6e4406
  • BKS-0210 | MATERIALS_ceramics_and_synthetic_crystals.pptx | /SUR/Materials_ceramics_and_synthetic_crystals.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_1830a02b2c5081919fd6d313a70f4dd0
  • BKS-0211 | MATERIALS_ceramics_and_synthetic_crystals.pptx | /Projects EQUILIBRIUM/Materials_ceramics_and_synthetic_crystals.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_3e0b8fb992a08191a16646a199bc9d25
  • BKS-0212 | Materials science_SKFE_ceramics_synthetic_crystals.docx | /Machinery/Materials_SKFE_ceramics_synthetic_crystals.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_e0050b2add5081919b307bc27cedbd96
  • BKS-0213 | LOCATION_Single_Storage_System.docx | /Place/Place_single_storage system.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_03263dddc5b4819196f0e88f006f4828
  • BKS-0214 | PLACE_Single_Storage_Presentation.pptx | /Place/Place_Single_Storage_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_3eb8d9bd97788191bec8d6c99f14f822
  • BKS-0215 | World_without_borders_advancement_portal.docx | /World without borders/World_without_boundaries_promotion_portal.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_cefec3b008808191ac19e207f0d9e5be
  • BKS-0216 | World_without_borders_promotion_portal.pdf | /World without borders/World_without_borders_promotion_portal.pdf | PDF | F11 | libfile_f82dfdee32e48191abf94b958312c7e4
  • BKS-0217 | World_without_borders_promotion_portal.pptx | /World without borders/World_without_borders_promotion_portal.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_9ece4ce3ae4081918873f33f369adeee
  • BKS-0218 | Narratives_and_values_EQUILIBRIUM_13x20.docx | /Social Cooperation/Narratives_and_values_EQUILIBRIUM_13x20.docx | DOCX | F07 | libfile_77251620c2508191b618207b75227ba9
  • BKS-0219 | Narratives_and_values_EQUILIBRIUM_13x20.pptx | /Social Cooperation/Narratives_and_values_EQUILIBRIUM_13x20.pptx | PPTX | F07 | libfile_d4cf495a2d78819182575b81230bafac
  • BKS-0220 | Science_Fields_Unions-741.docx | /Field Theory/Science_Fields_Unions-741.docx | DOCX | F10 | libfile_0d9d60f6cb5c8191a735b27c71e42769
  • BKS-0221 | National_Centers_validation_ESG-IR_ECO-PPA.docx | /Contract PPA/National_Centers_validations_ESG-IR_ECO-PPA.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_bd82f10bdb2c8191af5f192c21ffb5b9
  • BKS-0222 | National_Centers_validation_ESG-IR_ECO-PPA.pptx | /Contract PPA/National_Centers_validations_ESG-IR_ECO-PPA.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_89d98c5716fc819180d8f470ba55c97e
  • BKS-0223 | Neural_Culture_and_Civilization_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/Neurology_Culture_and_Civilization_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_b9ecd8b2027c8191b10069e7d4f7c90f
  • BKS-0224 | Neurologist_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/Neurosovod_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_5a67c2ed28208191b5c02748170afe38
  • BKS-0225 | Neurologist_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/Neurosovod_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_de41fdbaaa5c81919cb287b9a8014e7e
  • BKS-0226 | New SCF Metallurgy Industry.docx | /Machine Science/New Industry SCF Metallurgy.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_a526c918f67c8191861533c92ee21677
  • BKS-0227 | Новая_финансовая_система_Человек_эмиссионный_центр_и_банк_ЕГ.docx | /Книга кинов/Новая_финансовая_система_Человек_эмиссионный_центр_и_банк_ЕГ.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_5506a22fd6c0819183f68f26cfbcd281
  • BKS-0228 | Новая_финансовая_система_Человек_эмиссионный_центр_и_банк_ЕГ.pptx | /Книга кинов/Новая_финансовая_система_Человек_эмиссионный_центр_и_банк_ЕГ.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_41ad24aa810081918ed129d6dcc599d4
  • BKS-0229 | NPP_ASI_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASI/NPP_ASI_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_3fa0980079048191b1708be2fca25bd8
  • BKS-0230 | NPP_ASI_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASI/NPP_ASI_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_648c4921ec988191852b7fe583303c74
  • BKS-0231 | ORION_22-22_Strategic_concept.docx | ORION22-22_Strategic_concept.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_6c79d36e5278819193a8f358319c2836
  • BKS-0232 | ORION_22-22_Strategic_presentation.pptx | ORION22-22_Strategic_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_a63269f12a948191add8eb87cafd16ca
  • BKS-0233 | Parks_Russia_and_world_Cities_Knowledge_Superclass.docx | /Projects EQUILIBRIUM/Parks_Russia_and_world_Cities_Knowledge_Superclass.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_5a018d1fae848191838da304bdc8b2b8
  • BKS-0234 | Parks_Russia_and_world_Cities_Knowledge_Superclass.pdf | /Projects EQUILIBRIUM/Parks_Russia_and_world_Cities_Knowledge_Superclass.pdf | PDF | F11 | libfile_de92440e7fa88191aa308c003df62d3a
  • BKS-0235 | Parks_Russia_and_world_Cities_Knowledge_Superclass.pptx | /Projects EQUILIBRIUM/Parks_Russia_and_world_Cities_Knowledge_Superclass.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_05269d10f2c48191bc069015b9b65038
  • BKS-0236 | Primary_Contour_Report_About_Results_Work_Co-operative.docx | /Report 01 August/Primary_Contour_Report_About_Results_Work_Co-operative.docx | DOCX | F12 | libfile_1f21ed23d63081919158299f625b86f1
  • BKS-0237 | Pilot_ECO_PPA_260_million_road_map_WBG_adapted.pptx | /Report 01 August/Pilot_ECO_PPA_260_million_road_map_WBG_adapted.pptx | PPTX | F12 | libfile_14765cbce3b4819194829a19a98ac79e
  • BKS-0238 | Планета_как_одно_государство_ЕГ.docx | /Книга кинов/Планета_как_одно_государство_ЕГ.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_096758933d8c8191bfa56945db6534a5
  • BKS-0239 | Планета_как_одно_государство_ЕГ.pptx | /Книга кинов/Планета_как_одно_государство_ЕГ.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_95c7265d9b088191b06dc2f436ef84a1
  • BKS-0240 | Планетарный_Баланс_и_Баланс_Биосферы_ЕГ.docx | /Книга кинов/Планетарный_Баланс_и_Баланс_Биосферы_ЕГ.docx | DOCX | F09 | libfile_c2401467bf9c8191a4ce78adb992a568
  • BKS-0241 | Планетарный_Баланс_и_Баланс_Биосферы_ЕГ.pptx | /Книга кинов/Планетарный_Баланс_и_Баланс_Биосферы_ЕГ.pptx | PPTX | F09 | libfile_0555d46c7f908191983dfd29b4de0b74
  • BKS-0242 | Portal_five_natural_Relay_Fire_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /IT System/Portal_Five_Nice_Relay_Fire_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F05 | libfile_7f7f57d74cdc8191ace405bf89ca4f4e
  • BKS-0243 | Portal_five_natural_Relay_Fire_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /IT System/Portal_Five_Nice_Relay_Fire_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F05 | libfile_d3a8c859010c81919a247299cd7dbcd8
  • BKS-0244 | Presentation_estimate_260_million_ECO_PPA.pptx | /Report 01 August/Presentation_estimates_260_million_ECO_PPA.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_e6317a3245108191bff41f2600b226a5
  • BKS-0245 | Trade Union_4_0_Presentation.pptx | /Contract PPA/Trade Union_4_0_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_519c22689f2c81919701037548b2853c
  • BKS-0246 | Trade Union_4_0_Strategic_program.docx | /Contract PPA/Trade Union_4_0_Strategic_program.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_eec2b74cddf08191a80f9a1be95c8cf4
  • BKS-0247 | Register_741_Other Organiser741.docx | /Field Theory/Register_741_Other Organiser741.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_1815d02c8cc8819185034c38f7ebb2d0
  • BKS-0248 | Register_741_Other Organiser741.pptx | /Field Theory/Register_741_Other Organiser741.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_28b2b189ee208191aaf4eeec0da1fbf7
  • BKS-0249 | Register_funds_NPK_NGO_SPECIALS.docx | /Register_funds_NPK_NGO_SPECIFIC.docx | DOCX | F03 | libfile_d14d14d6f0508191a65ac1112f8acba4
  • BKS-0250 | Roles_Nations_OS_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/Roles_Nations_OS_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_40efc0aff5dc8191908a05dd1c8f0b53
  • BKS-0251 | Roles_Nations_OS_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM/Roles_Nations_OS_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_f61d1e2b2c108191a3c7b9701683a1ff
  • BKS-0252 | Russia_Analysis_Balance_State Corporation_30_years_New_Contribution.docx | /Engineering/Russia_Analysis_Balance_State Corporation_30_years_New_Contribution.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_9f580abbef2c81918e2675584986f787
  • BKS-0253 | Russia_Analysis_Balance_State Corporation_30_years_New_Contribution.pptx | /Engineering/Russia_Analysis_Balance_State Corporation_30_years_New_Contribution.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_142c7927ce5c81919089155afecaaffc
  • BKS-0254 | Russia_Ideal_World order.docx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/Russia_Ideal_World order.docx | DOCX | F08 | libfile_7ab3dd6407188191a954038dd4dd3806
  • BKS-0255 | Russia_Ideal_World order_Light_presentation.pptx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/Russia_Ideal_World order_Light_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_eec40c935c588191b5b5c54b3f1df88f
  • BKS-0256 | Russia_Ideal_World Order_Light_Joyful.pptx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/Russia_Ideal_World Order_Light_Joyful.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_f245586160a081918f8df1b987705e01
  • BKS-0257 | Russia_Master_Poem_BIOTRON_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /IT System/Russia_Master_Poems_BIOTRON_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_8990a7cb2e0c8191986a0fb3a174b490
  • BKS-0258 | Russia_Master_Poem_BIOTRON_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /IT System/Russia_Master_Poems_BIOTRON_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_c82cfe8a557c8191a32decd0163e3b86
  • BKS-0259 | Russia_Science_Future.docx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/Russia_Science_Future.docx | DOCX | F10 | libfile_f7f7a4aef4388191822a212fd11cc0a6
  • BKS-0260 | Russia_Science_Future_presentation.pptx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/Russia_Science_Future_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F10 | libfile_853d79827d148191a11171d3d6d34b3a
  • BKS-0261 | Russia_New_Conclusion.docx | /Machine Science/Russia_New_Conclusion.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_02cc6dae50f481919f083221994d5961
  • BKS-0262 | Russia_New_Claim.pdf | /Engineering/Russia_New_Conclusion.pdf | PDF | F04 | libfile_655484b3a87c81919cb9b1389acf9f1e
  • BKS-0263 | Russia_New_Conclusion.pptx | /Machine Science/Russia_New_Conclusion.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_0a5826edf18c8191abff0e873555e433
  • BKS-0264 | Russia_Planning_System_and_Design.docx | /Engineering/Russia_Planning_System_and_Design.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_3317c4dec28c8191abe8e460812fcd90
  • BKS-0265 | Russia_Planning_System_and_design.pdf | /Engineering/Russia_Planning_System_and_design.pdf | PDF | F04 | libfile_cdf11e7dbe948191a1e8710f9802c2c3
  • BKS-0266 | Russia_Planning_System_and_Design.pptx | /Engineering/Russia_Planning_System_and_Design.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_0a3c856ed88081918526ca0a04837a51
  • BKS-0267 | English_world_goals_strategy_structure.docx | /36/Russian_world_goals_strategy_structure.docx | DOCX | F08 | libfile_cd690635b9788191a220eb50eb2894b2
  • BKS-0268 | English_world_goals_strategy_structure.pptx | /36/Russian_world_goals_strategy_structure.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_c1fe54b389108191af8328a6b0a0234c
  • BKS-0269 | Russian_world_goals_strategy_structure_readable(1).pptx | /36/Russian_world_goals_strategy_structure_readable(1).pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_6cfe0780b3288191b37033f44300a8c7
  • BKS-0270 | English_world_goals_strategy_structure_readable.pptx | /36/Russian_world_goals_strategy_structure_readable.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_07c4098ed4b88191a3197aa4d0c435e8
  • BKS-0271 | English_world_goals_strategy_structure_readable_large_fonts.pptx | /36/Russian_world_goals_strategy_structure_readable_large_fonts.pptx | PPTX | F08 | libfile_e99e00bb35888191b68aae7968aea3c6
  • BKS-0272 | Self-assembly_natural-technical_system.docx | /SUR/Self-adjusting_natural-technical_system.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_0b025823c9e08191b4ba30cc0d738000
  • BKS-0273 | Self-assembly_natural-technical_system.pptx | /SUR/Self-assembly_natural-technical_system.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_8dcfc13c0ef08191975fd13b47fe5084
  • BKS-0274 | Connectivity_best_projects_world_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/Connectivity_Best_Projects_World_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_efe1304e136c8191930d29390e939a54
  • BKS-0275 | Connectivity_best_projects_world_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/Connectivity_Best_Projects_World_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_9106a8908cf081918b62b09464967dbd
  • BKS-0276 | Selenkin Alexander Gennadievich.pdf | /Rakoshits doctrine Ross/Selenkin Alexander Gennadievich.pdf | PDF | F02 | libfile_4348704ae238819197e095cf70cbca9d
  • BKS-0277 | System_System_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/System_System_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_61a49ca2b5988191bdd9c681ff485df0
  • BKS-0278 | Weak_sides_countries_and_regions.pptx | /36/Weak_sides_countries_and_regions.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_62b2decaa3888191bf3db0c792e90373
  • BKS-0279 | Estimate_260_million_ecomodules_and_mini_generation.xlsx | /Report 01 August/estimate_260_million_ecomodules_and_mini_generation.xlsx | XLSX | F06 | libfile_20761741797c8191a37b1001748561be
  • BKS-0280 | Social_marketplace_concept.docx | /Social Cooperation/Social_marketplace_concept.docx | DOCX | F07 | libfile_28d73d6dc9088191a20cc148b1ef7661
  • BKS-0281 | Social_marketplace_presentation.pptx | /Social Cooperation/Social_marketplace_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F07 | libfile_3c00a1c16e608191b5387583677239af
  • BKS-0282 | SPECSAYTA_Hydrorobotics.docx | /Machine Science/Specification_Hydrorobotics.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_6e4c54c0b9f48191a55376850874361b
  • BKS-0283 | SPECSAYTA_Hydrorobotics.pptx | /Machine Science/Specification_Hydrorobotechnika.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_4b79f96496d08191b1ae98ebfbd9b389
  • BKS-0284 | SPECSAIT_Shipbuilding_USC_VTB_Inmortrans_Ocean80.docx | /Machine Science/SPECSUIT_Shipbuilding_OSK_VTB_Inmortrans_Ocean80.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_280c69cacf9081918cb5f9bdffa33c22
  • BKS-0285 | SPECSAIT_Shipbuilding_USC_VTB_Inmortrans_Ocean80.pptx | /Machine Science/SPECSUIT_Shipbuilding_OSK_VTB_Inmortrans_Ocean80.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_499d49f6f72481918f55e6e0a527edcb
  • BKS-0286 | Standard_Development_Human_HRP_1.0.docx | /Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASI/Standard_Development_Person_RDP_1.0.docx | DOCX | F07 | libfile_21338077a8a4819183f118768cf63aee
  • BKS-0287 | Standards_Development_Person_RPM_1.0.pptx | /Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASI/Standards_Development_Person_Person_Person_Person_Person_1.0.pptx | PPTX | F07 | libfile_a1218ca558788191b25c5c2790693704
  • BKS-0288 | SPHERE_single_space_initiatives.docx | /Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASI/SPHERE_single_space_initiatives.docx | DOCX | F07 | libfile_e23e461a64088191994bc35bcc1eed67
  • BKS-0289 | SPHERE_single_space_initiatives.pptx | /Agency for Strategic Initiatives ASI/SPHERE_single_space_initiatives.pptx | PPTX | F07 | libfile_2a4b2b288c048191ae6e765784dcaf62
  • BKS-0290 | Sphere_New_Setting_Coded_Art.docx | /City Events/Spheres_New_Setting_Coded_Art.docx | DOCX | F11 | libfile_1f7f2e0204c88191a581b7877a56184a
  • BKS-0291 | SPHERE_New_Setting_Coded_Art_Presentation.pdf | /City Events/Spheres_New_Constitution_Coded_Art_Presentation.pdf | PDF | F11 | libfile_fb87a2dca304819188f955661e7ca6dd
  • BKS-0292 | Sphere_New_Setting_Coded_Art_Presentation.pptx | /City Events/Spheres_New_Setting_Coded_Art_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F11 | libfile_8c595d09cc94819197e252420f8dd9dd
  • BKS-0293 | Theory_Counts_Unions741.docx | /Field Theory/Theory_Counts_Union741.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_e24ac1b233288191b567444287950b12
  • BKS-0294 | Theory_Counts_Unions741_Presentation.pptx | /Field Theory/Theory_Counts_Union741_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_5381c19aa4fc8191a4a7d11a419c1506
  • BKS-0295 | Theory_Nodes_Union741_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /Field Theory/Theory_Knots_Union741_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_177c015ea53081918751d6cf9d283ad1
  • BKS-0296 | Theory_Nodes_Union741_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /Field Theory/Theory_Knots_Union741_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_dfce6212bcec819185f235b27ce9b5a2
  • BKS-0297 | Transport-industrial_contour_Russia_2035-2050.docx | /General Designer/Transport-industrial_Contour_Russia_2035-2050.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_da688f17674c8191b2224cd0ec0cf7c4
  • BKS-0298 | Transport-industrial_contour_Russia_2035-2050.pptx | /General Designer/Transport-industrial_Contour_Russia_2035-2050.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_c90841428b9c8191970b7e016dedf286
  • BKS-0299 | Universal_law_systems.docx | /New Physics/Universal_Law_Systems.docx | DOCX | F10 | libfile_cfdeeeb2f740819180487ee9f1539392
  • BKS-0300 | Universal_law_systems_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /New Physics/Universal_Law_Systems_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F10 | libfile_f3043d6ba79c81919d47a11f21f9a179
  • BKS-0301 | Manage_Styles_Light_Presentation.pptx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/Style Management_Light_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_27ae6f5262108191ba19777ae6faa771
  • BKS-0302 | _Other OrganiserEQUILIBRIUM.docx | /EQUILIBRIUM Unique Russia/Style Management_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_fee4e43e7b6c8191a84e3ddbab4b8be0
  • BKS-0303 | CHARTER NPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA - format for the site PHOTO.pdf | /ORION22:22/Charter NPK NPO SPECZASHCHITA - format for the site PHOTO.pdf | PDF | F01 | libfile_26822842d8e8819189392a0db4055ddf
  • BKS-0304 | Funds_NPK_NGO_SPECSE.pptx | /Funds_NPC_NGO_SPEAKING.pptx | PPTX | F03 | libfile_7a7a3866d5ac8191b1af2df3a5bf4717
  • BKS-0305 | Formula_Genplan_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /Core Mathematics Achitecture EQUILIBRIUM/Formula_Genplan_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F10 | libfile_19364c2bdf1c8191b13984280ae37433
  • BKS-0306 | Formula_Genplan_EQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx | /Core Mathematics Achitecture EQUILIBRIUM/Formula_Genplan_EQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F10 | libfile_50a0dce2a1908191bc99dd9556ffe4b3
  • BKS-0307 | Hedging_Powers_Russia.docx | /Machine Science/Hedging_Powers_Russia.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_ed96fdec100481918d9b9a62ff07b6f6
  • BKS-0308 | Hedging_Powers_Russia.pptx | /Machine Science/Hedging_Powers_Russia.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_f26579bd5ddc81919d157d9d433284b8
  • BKS-0309 | Civilization.docx | /Social Cooperation/Civilization.docx | DOCX | F07 | libfile_4fee2b849dd48191bb4d4962bfcf29c3
  • BKS-0310 | Civilization.pptx | /Social Cooperation/Civilization.pptx | PPTX | F07 | libfile_f13afd6917608191adeb64a60f3a6690
  • BKS-0311 | Evolution_standards_and_standards_Construction complex_RF.docx | /Evolution_standards_and_standards_Constructioncomplex_RF.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_0a09bc7fbf748191863737e76f7c6103
  • BKS-0312 | Evolution_standards_and_standards_Construction complex_RF.pptx | /Evolution_standards_and_standards_Construction complex_RF.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_89200a3c0b588191989a14b9edaa38f7
  • BKS-0313 | EQUILIBRIUM_Hyperloops_and_speed_systems.docx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Hyperloops_and_speed_systems.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_0f0aaa7820088191b633adf4baf21a3e
  • BKS-0314 | EQUILIBRIUM_Hyperloops_and_speed_systems.pptx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Hyperloops_and_speed_systems.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_a801873966b0819199aa4dbfdff43490
  • BKS-0315 | EQUILIBRIUM_Industrial_circuit_technology.docx | /36/EQUILIBRIUM_Industrial_circuit_technology.docx | DOCX | F04 | libfile_ae4af16afae881918389c11f6805e32c
  • BKS-0316 | EQUILIBRIUM_Industrial_circuit_technology.pptx | /36/EQUILIBRIUM_Industrial_circuit_technology.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_9de78e3507948191bd459392028ffa53
  • BKS-0317 | ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Как_собрать_в_Единое.docx | /IT система/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Как_собрать_в_Единое.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_a1e21f2ffaf881919e84b164ccde6afd
  • BKS-0318 | ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Как_собрать_в_Единое_презентация.pptx | /IT система/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Как_собрать_в_Единое_презентация.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_f3950455751481919e88d962f9c11589
  • BKS-0319 | EQUILIBRIUM_Materials_and_transport.pptx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Materials_and_transport.pptx | PPTX | F04 | libfile_74351c9c997081919fe793dc66169061
  • BKS-0320 | EQUILIBRIUM_Inter-industry_contour_presentation.pptx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Inter-industry_contour_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_e70dd29edcec8191aa8a2c50827b2039
  • BKS-0321 | EQUILIBRIUM_Intersectoral_federal_contour.docx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Intersectoral_federal_contour.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_dbb5c7b066ac81918fd426851f4c07b2
  • BKS-0322 | EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Science_Departmental_Note.docx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Science_Departmental_Note.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_851d0530a1008191b813b0ea25601c08
  • BKS-0323 | EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Science_presentation.pptx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Science_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_39ed45afe0188191a7ad3fadecd79224
  • BKS-0324 | EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Nature_Departmental_Note.docx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Nature_Departmental_Note.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_ed431596245481919e48ae575f51e07a
  • BKS-0325 | EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Nature_presentation.pptx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Nature_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_233c5b8e4c988191a5c21675df3b2332
  • BKS-0326 | EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Industry_Departmental_Note.docx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Industry_Departmental_Note.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_0757d53872908191813d0c4169dcc77d
  • BKS-0327 | EQUILIBRIUM_Minpromtorg_presentation.pptx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Minpromtorg_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_01a2acfe728c8191a34d50651921adc5
  • BKS-0328 | EQUILIBRIUM_Minstroy_Department_Note.docx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Minstroy_Department_Note.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_554235016cc0819186ee4acb5162c2d1
  • BKS-0329 | EQUILIBRIUM_Minstroy_presentation.pptx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Minstroy_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_9716856638d48191abbf47d354caea4d
  • BKS-0330 | EQUILIBRIUM_Mintrans_agency_note.docx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Mintrans_agency_note.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_7c2bb3108d408191b6cbf53711a6cfdc
  • BKS-0331 | EQUILIBRIUM_Mintrans_presentation.pptx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Mintrans_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_189a5def745481919640f8f1035aed77
  • BKS-0332 | ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минцифры_ведомственная_записка.docx | /Генеральный конструктор/ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Минцифры_ведомственная_записка.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_369bafea2890819194f400ac12826e35
  • BKS-0333 | EQUILIBRIUM_Minds_presentation.pptx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Minds_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_91c3c99e2b0081918f1fd8c6780b41e1
  • BKS-0334 | EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Economic Development_Departmental_Note.docx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Economic Development_Departmental_Note.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_f20b23dfce0481919c4f36159258c222
  • BKS-0335 | EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Economic Development_presentation.pptx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Economic Development_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_b68184bcf530819189de9f6328c0228c
  • BKS-0336 | EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Energy_Departmental_Note.docx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Energy_Departmental_Note.docx | DOCX | F02 | libfile_eec0816c8af081919942670e2029eeb1
  • BKS-0337 | EQUILIBRIUM_Minenergo_presentation.pptx | /General Designer/EQUILIBRIUM_Minenergo_presentation.pptx | PPTX | F02 | libfile_247f6c35cc088191bdbfa4346123c7c7
  • BKS-0338 | EQUILIBRIUM_Other Organiser1.0.docx | /IT system/EQUILIBRIUM_Other Organiser1.0.docx | DOCX | F01 | libfile_c71f6ee8d4888191b8babf639cb0fdbe
  • BKS-0339 | EQUILIBRIUM_Other Organiser1.0_Presentation.pptx | /IT system/EQUILIBRIUM_Other Organiser1.0_Presentation.pptx | PPTX | F01 | libfile_49ff2be1f2f88191a6fb905afe6446fa
  • BKS-0340 | ECO-PPA_Minigeneration_Ecomodules_Biocenoses_Robotics_Validation.docx | /SUR/ECO-PPA_Minigeneration_Ecomodules_Biocenoses_Robotics_Validation.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_cf8ad21a88c0819197d635fefd9a4cab
  • BKS-0341 | ECO-PPA_Minigeneration_Ecomodules_Biocenoses_Robotics_Validation.pptx | /SUR/ECO-PPA_Minigeneration_Ecomodules_Biocenosis_Robotics_Validation.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_761c12857d1c8191a51d400569de2fea
  • BKS-0342 | Efir_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /IT system/EFIR_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F06 | libfile_58b2092f8a2c819180d9d780c188c51d
  • BKS-0343 | Efir_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | /IT system/EFIR_Portal_five_natural_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx | PPTX | F06 | libfile_9512ed1f03288191964eee73940e7a15
  • BKS-0344 | EFS_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | /IT system/EFS_EQUILIBRIUM.docx | DOCX | F05 | libfile_5e1c7761b6488191a42a6d7dbb2f67ea

Published files

Management · Full published text

Intangible Assets: Managing Intangible Capital

Source Status: Primary Document

A master document on the transition from recording rights to systematically identifying, documenting, valuing, protecting and using intangible assets.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/nematerialnye-aktivy-upravlenie-kapitalom

Open on the site
Level 1Accounting and tax accounting of NMA
Level 2Register of rights, technologies, data, software and brands
Level 3Strategic capitalization of knowledge, meanings and intellectual infrastructure

Version 1.0 • 2026

1. The essence: MMA as a managed value system

  • The accounting outline answers the question: what can be recognized by the IA in the reporting and at what cost.
  • The legal outline answers the question: who owns the exclusive rights, in what territory, for what period and on what grounds.
  • The management outline answers the question: what intangible resources create value, even if they are not yet recognized in accounting.
  • The Investment Outline answers the question: which IAs can generate cash flow, reduce risks, increase capitalization and serve as the basis for licenses, franchises, concessions and partnerships.
  • The digital circuit transforms disparate rights and knowledge into a verifiable ledger with a passport of each asset and links to projects, funds, organizations and balance sheets.

2. What about MMA

ClassExamplesBasic protectionValue model
Patent rightsinventions, utility models, industrial designsPatents, contractslicensing, production, royalties
Software and Digital Solutionsprograms, algorithms, platforms, modulesexclusive right, registration, contractsSaaS, Licenses, Subscriptions, Integrations
Databasesstructured data sets, registers, directoriescopyright/related rights, access modeanalytics, services, access, efficiency improvement
Means of individualizationtrademarks, brands, commercial designationsregistration of signs, contractspremium to price, franchise, loyalty
Secrets of productionknow-how, recipes, technological modesthe Trade Secrets RegimeCompetitive Advantage and Licenses
Content and documentationmethods, standards, training materials, architecturescopyright, contractsreplication, training, implementation
Contractual rightslicenses, concessional and other rights in the performance of accounting criteriaContractual documentationaccess to the market, exploitation, flows
Business reputationGoodwill occurs primarily when acquiring a businesstransaction, evaluationsynergy, customer base, market position

Important: not every intangible resource is an accounting IA. For example, staff competencies, part of reputational capital, unformed knowledge and relationships may have high managerial value, but do not meet the criteria for recognition of an asset.

3. Recognition criteria and boundaries

  1. The object is controlled by the organization: there are rights and the ability to limit the access of others to benefits.
  2. The object is able to bring economic benefits in the future.
  3. The object is identifiable and separate or arises from legal/contractual rights.
  4. Intended for use in activities during the period corresponding to the accounting rules.
  5. The initial cost can be determined and confirmed by documents.
  6. The rights, limitations, useful life and model of subsequent accounting are fixed in the accounting and legal documentation.

4. Expanded map of intangible capital

LayerWhat is includedObjective of management
I. Recognized IArights, software, patents, trademarks, licensesaccounting, depreciation/depreciation, reporting
II. Disbursable assetsR&D results, methodologies, databases, know-how, documentationinventory → legal package → rating → registration when fulfilling criteria
III. Strategic capitalknowledge, competence, communications, reputation, architecture, data, standardsValue and risk management even without accounting recognition
IV. Ecosystem capitalnetwork effects, partnerships, access to infrastructure, trustscaling, cooperation, reduction of transaction costs

5. The life cycle of IA

01. Detect

02. Identify

03. Submit rights

04. Rate

05. Recognize/Classify

06. Include in the registry

07. Exploit

08. License/Monetize

09. Overestimating the risks

10. Modernize

11. Transfer/Input

12. Write/Archive

6. NMA passport: a single asset card

Passport fieldContents
ID / codeunique code, version, registry owner
Name and classpatent / software / database / mark / know-how / methodology / contract law
Rights holderorganization, fund, author, joint owners
Legal basispatent, certificate, contract, act, job assignment, secrecy regime
Territory and termjurisdiction, duration of rights, renewals
Author/developerpersons and organizations-sources
Initial costcost composition and supporting documents
Estimated valuevaluation method, date, evaluator, range
Income profileroyalty, cost savings, subscription, license sale, revenue impact
Connectionsprojects, products, contracts, funds, technologies, standards, registers
Riskschallenging rights, leakage, dependence on key persons, technological obsolescence
Statusdevelopment / protection / implementation / licensing / dispute / archive

7. Assessment of the cost of IA

  • Cost approach: how much it costs to create or replace an asset with comparable utility.
  • Profitable approach: the current value of future cash flows associated with an asset; a private option is relief-from-royalty for brands and technologies.
  • Comparative approach: targeting transactions and market rates on comparable licenses/assets.
  • Option approach: useful for high-ambiguity technologies and developments where value depends on future decisions and stages.

8. Management System of NMA

ContourFunctionKey resultProcess Owner
Legalregistration and protection of rightsPure title chainlegal function / IP
Technologicalversioning, maturity, implementationcurrent technological passportR&D / CTO
Financialaccounting, valuation, depreciation, impeachmentReliable cost and effectCFO / Accounting
Commerciallicenses, royalties, franchises, dealscash flowBusiness Development
Informationregistry, access, provenance, auditA single source of truthCDO / archive / IAC
Risk-contourdisputes, leaks, dependency, cyber risksRisk Map and Protection Measurescompliance / security

9. NMA in Architecture EQUILIBRIUM — SFERA — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA

  • EQUILIBRIUM: the layer of observation, classification, evaluation of bonds and balance sheets of intangible assets.
  • SFERA: A space of projects and initiatives where IAs become components of products, programs and partnerships.
  • ECO-PPA: Mechanism for linking IA with resources, objectives, risks, indicators and contract contours.
  • SPECZASHCHITA: Executive outline - design, implementation, licensing, production cooperation and protection of results.
  • Archive of heritage preservation: fixation of origin, authorship, versions, evidence, historical materials and succession.
  • Funds system: distribution of IA by personal, personal, project, branch and trust funds with a transparent regime of ownership and use.

10. HMA and Balance Sheet System

1. Technology: patents, know-how, technology maps, digital twins

2. Personnel: teaching methods, competence models, knowledge bases

3. Ecology: models of biocenoses, bases of observations, methods of validation

4. Construction: TIM/BIM-models, classifiers, solution libraries, software

5. Transport: optimization algorithms, maps, digital models of infrastructure

6. Finance: scoring models, methodologies, rights registries, software cores

7. Science: research results, experimental bases, scientific collections, software

8. Culture: archives, works, brands, digital collections, rights

11. Roadmap for the implementation of the IA register

StageTimeframeActionsResult
0. Normalization0–30 daysapprove classifier, roles, passport template, access modeUniform Rules
1. Inventory30–90 dayscollect objects, documents, authorship, contracts, versionsDraft Registry
2. Legal packaging60–180 daysclose the gaps in rights, registration, NDA/secret regimesNet Chain of Rights
3. Evaluation90–210 dayssegment assets, determine valuation methods and prioritiescost map
4. Capitalization120–270 dayslicenses, deposits, franchises, partner models, accountingmonetary effect
5. Integration180–365 dayslink IA with projects, balance sheets, funds, archive and BIDigital Control System

12. KPI intangible capital

  • Percentage of objects with confirmed ownership.
  • Share of critical IAs with backup documentation and succession plan, %.
  • The value of the portfolio according to the selected methods of valuation and change in value for the period.
  • Revenue and cost savings directly related to IA.
  • Number of licenses, implementations, partnership agreements and re-applications.
  • Share of IA related to specific products, projects and cash flows.
  • Number of legal defects, disputes and incidents of leakage/unauthorized use.
  • The average time from the creation of the result to legal registration and inclusion in the register.

13. Launch Solution

  1. Create a unified register of NMA and intangible capital with distinction of accounting, legal, market and strategic status.
  2. Approve the passport of the NMA and a single classifier of objects.
  3. Carry out portfolio inventory: rights, software, databases, technologies, techniques, brands, archives, licenses, know-how.
  4. Form a cross-functional commission: law + finance + technology + data + commercialization + security.
  5. Highlight priority assets for legal packaging, valuation and monetization.
  6. Link the registry to the Heritage Preservation Archive, Funds System, Project Outline and Balance Sheet System.

14. Normative support and sources

1. FSBU 14/2022 "Intangible assets" - requirements for accounting information about NMA.

2. Tax Code of the Russian Federation, Art. 257 - definition of IA for the purposes of income tax, requirements for economic benefits and confirmation of rights.

3. Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation - legal regulation of the results of intellectual activity and means of individualization.

4. International orientations: IAS 38 Intangible Assets, IFRS 3 Business Combinations, ISO 55000 family - useful for comparing approaches to assets acquired by IA and asset management.

NMA = Rights × Knowledge × Data × Technology × Trust × Management

Other published edition: NMA Intangible assets NMA_Nematernialnye_aktivy_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

From accounting rights to the system of intangible capital management

RIGHTS

IP and Contracts

DATA

Databases and registries

TECHNOLOGIES

PO, know-how, techniques

CAPITALIZATION

Licenses and cash flows

1. NMA is a system of managed value

Two levels: recognised assets and wider intangible capital

Accounting level

Strategic level

What meets the criteria for recognition of IA: controlled and identifiable rights that can bring economic benefits and have a proven value.

Knowledge, Data, Competence, Reputation, Standards, Networks and Architecture. Not all of them are accounting IAs, but they need to be managed as capital.

Task of the system

Detect → to issue rights → evaluate → Registering where applicable → to be included in the register → Link to projects and cash flows → Protect → Licensed → Scaling.

2. Main classes of IA

Patents

Databases

Brands

inventions, models, industrial designs

programs, algorithms, platforms

registers, directories, arrays of observations

trademarks, means of individualization

Know-how

Techniques

Licenses

Goodwill

secrets of production, technological regimes

standards, documentation, content

contractual rights of use

the effect of acquired business and synergy

3. When an object becomes an MMA

Key criteria for recognition

• Control over the object and its benefits

• The ability to bring economic benefits

• Identity/legal or contractual rights

• Use in business for a specified period

• Documented original cost

• Certain useful lives, limitations and subsequent accounting model

4. The Four Layers of Intangible Capital

I. Recognized IA

Accounting assets: rights, software, patents, trademarks, licenses.

II. Designable

Developments, methods, bases, know-how, documentation.

III. Strategic

Knowledge, competence, communication, reputation, standards.

IV. Ecosystems

Network effects, trust, partnerships, access to infrastructure.

5. The life cycle of IA

Detect

Rights

Rate

Register

Introducing

Monetize

Protect

Refresh

The main principle

The asset must live not in the legal department’s folder, but in a related system → Technology → Project → Product → Contract → cash flow → Risk → archive.

6. Passport of the NMA — a single asset card

Legal identification block

Financial and management unit

• ID and version • Class and name • Rightholder • Legal basis • Territory and term • Author / Developer

• Cost: accounting / market • Income profile • Related projects and contracts • Risks and constraints • Life cycle status • Archive of origin / provenance

7. Assessment of IA: four different costs

Balance

Tax

Market

Strategic

Cost in accounting

Cost for tax purposes

Transaction/License/Contribution Evaluation

Impact on system, sustainability and future flows

• Cost approach — creation/replacement

• Profitable approach — discounted flows and relief-from-royalty

• Comparative approach — transactions and rates by analogues

• Option approach — high uncertainty technologies

8. Six contours of the control of NMA

Legal

Technological

Financial

Rights and Chain of Title

Versions and Maturity

Accounting and evaluation

Commercial

Information

Risk-contour

Licenses and Royalties

Registry and Provenance

leaks, disputes, obsolescence

9. NMA in Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

ECO-PPA

classification, communication, balance sheets, analytics

projects, initiatives, products

resources, indicators, contracts, risks

SPECZASHCHITA

ARCHIVE

FUNDS

design, implementation, licensing, protection

origin, versions, authorship, evidence

ownership, intended use, contribution and distribution

10. Paired balance: material + intangible

Material system

Intangible system

Equipment Infrastructure Raw materials Land Transport Production facilities

Patents and know-how Software and algorithms Databases Standards and techniques Brands and rights Digital models and archives

11. Road map for 12 months

Rules

classifier, passport, roles

0–30 days

Inventory

objects, documents, ownership

30–90 days

Legal packaging

registration, treaties, regimes

60–180 days

Evaluation

methods, priorities, cost map

90–210 days

Capitalization

licenses, deposits, transactions

120–270 days

Integration

balance sheets, funds, archive, BI

180–365 days

12. KPI NMA portfolio

• % of assets with confirmed rights chain

• Portfolio value and value dynamics

• Revenue/cost savings from NMA

• Number of licenses and implementations

• Time from the creation of the result to legal registration

• % of critical assets with reserve documentation

• Number of legal defects, disputes and incidents

• % of IA related to specific projects and cash flows

13. Proposed action

1. Unified Register

Create a single register of IA and intangible capital with separate statuses: accounting, legal, market, strategic.

2. Inventory and legal packaging

Collect rights, software, databases, technologies, techniques, brands, archives, licenses and know-how; close copyright defects.

3. Capitalization

Evaluate priority assets and run licensing, deposits, franchises, joint projects and other monetization models.

4. Related architecture

Link the IMA to the Heritage Preservation Archive, funds, projects, balances and EQUILIBRIUM.

NMA is the memory, law and intelligence of the system

As long as knowledge is not identified, shaped, or associated with value, it remains a hidden resource.

The IA register turns a hidden resource into managed capital.

Published files

Strategy · Full published text

ORION22:22 — Strategic Concept

Source Status: Primary Document

A concept and presentation of the ORION22:22 strategic architecture.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/orion-22-22-strategicheskaya-kontseptsiya

Open on the site

Operational Navigation

22 functions ↔ 22 measurable results

Unified navigation of meanings, data, decisions, resources, execution and memory

Strategic Concept • Version 1.0

25 August 2026

Initiator and author of the concept

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov • SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

Brief summary

ORION22:22 is not a separate portal or a new departmental registry. It is a meta-architecture that sets a single language, connects existing systems, shows decision owners, and translates strategy into a portfolio of verifiable actions. The central principle is compliance: each function of the system is assigned a measurable result, owner, data source, tolerance criterion and feedback loop.

The system brings together EQUILIBRIUM as an analytical operating environment, SFERA as a space for initiatives and cooperation, ECO-PPA as a mechanism for mobilising resources for verifiable impact, SPECZASHCHITA as the implementation framework, KRISTALL741 as the classification and modular core, and the Heritage Preservation Archive as a long-term memory of provenance, decisions and results.

ParameterContents
StatusDraft strategic concept for discussion and harmonization
PurposeNavigation by goals, registers, initiatives, risks, resources, pilots and evidence of results
Main audienceState bodies, development institutions, scientific and production organizations, territories, partners and public associations
HorizonPilot 12 months; replication 36 months; a constant learning and development loop
First decisionApprove the zero cycle, architectural group, pilot territory and single passport of the initiative

Navigation according to 22 provisions

№PositionPractical output
1Project profileObject, status, addressees and boundaries
2Essence and scaleWhat the system combines and what the result is
3The original problemWhy projects get lost between idea and series
4Name and working definitionDecoding O-R-I-O-N
5Formula 22:2222 functions and 22 results
6EcosystemRoles of EQUILIBRIUM, SFERA, ECO-PPA and partners
7Five layers of architectureMeaning, knowledge, decision, action, memory
822 Functional CircuitFull list of functions
922 measurable resultsSystem of indicators and evidence
10Life cycle of initiativeFrom registration to scaling
11The Digital CoreData, integration, AI and evidence environment
12The Meaning Graph and KRISTALL741Coherence and classification
13Digital twinModelling of territory and scenarios
14ManagementOrgans, roles and the right to stop
15EconomyProject financing and ECO-PPA
16Law and standardsCompatibility, Evidence and Audit
17Human beings and cultureCompetence, participation and heritage
18Safety and EthicsLimitations and red lines
19The First Pilots' PortfolioStarting Directions
20Pilot and road map100 days, 12 and 36 months
21Validation and maturityAdmission to replication
22Launch solution and manifestWhat needs to be approved

1. Passport of project

Name: ORION22:22 — Unified Register Intelligent Operational Navigation.

Type of project: cross-industry digital and organizational meta-architecture, ensuring the coherence of strategies, registers, data, initiatives, financial mechanisms, performers and evidence of results.

The object of management: not a separate organization, but the life cycle of socially significant, scientific and technological, environmental, cultural, infrastructure and international initiatives.

  • Boundaries of authority: ORION does not replace state bodies, data owners, scientific expertise, the court, control bodies or the project operator.
  • Principle of compatibility: existing information systems are maintained; ORION links them through passports, identifiers, exchange rules, and an evidence model.
  • Implementation mode: voluntary pilot with formalized agreements, the right to stop and independent verification of the result.

2. Essence and scale

Modern programs break down into unrelated documents, databases, budgets, pilots, and reports. Even a strong idea often lacks a single passport of origin, a responsible owner, a production trajectory, a verifiable baseline, and an understandable mechanism for moving to scale. ORION22:22 bridges the gap not by centralizing just one database, but by creating a common navigation framework.

The scale of the system is set in three dimensions: substantive - from nature and technology to culture and security; territorial - from the object and the municipality to the country and international cooperation; temporary - from the current event to the long-term heritage. At each level, it is possible to trace why the decision was made, by whom, what resources were used and what effect was obtained.

  • To see the whole: to form a map of systems, subjects, flows, risks and break points.
  • Collect action: translate idea into passport, consortium, funding, pilot and measurable result.
  • Preserve memory: record origin, rights, versions, decisions, errors, evidence, and conditions of replication.

The main product of ORION is not an information showcase, but managed connectivity: the system’s ability to quickly find competencies and resources, prevent duplication, detect conflict of goals and bring the solution to a confirmed effect.

3. The Problem: The Gap Between Idea and Result

GapManifestationConsequenceORION Response
SmyslovaDifferent participants have different understanding of the purpose and criteria for successConflict of priorities and reporting for the sake of reportingSingle ontology, tree of goals and map of contradictions
RosterObjects, rights, technologies and projects are described by different identifiersYou can't build a proof chain.Cross-Passport and Registry Conformity Table
ThisNo baseline, source quality not definedPrognosis and effect cannot be verifiedData Passport, Quality, Origin and Versions
OrganizationalThe owner of the decision does not coincide with the owner of the resultBlurred ResponsibilityRole agreement and power matrix
ProductionThe prototype is not related to the serial production and the customerPilots don't scale.Co-operative chain and criteria of serial readiness
FinancialFunded effect, but not confirmed effectCapital sees no managed riskECO-PPA, stage financing and independent verification
MemoryMistakes and lessons remain in individual teamsThe system repeats failed decisionsArchive of decisions, versions, results and constraints

4. Name and working definition

LetterComponentContents
AboutUnitedFederated connectivity without destroying the autonomy of participants and systems
RRosterReliance on passports of objects, rights, technologies, initiatives, data, roles and results
AndIntelligentAnalytics, graphs, modeling, forecasting and AI with mandatory human control
AboutOperatingDecision routes, regulations, roles, control of deadlines, resources, risks and quality of execution
N HNavigationUnderstanding the current state, target course, allowable trajectories and next responsible step

Working definition: ORION22:22 is a suprasystem navigation circuit that connects the semantic model, registers, data, digital twins, forecasts, initiatives, financing, cooperative execution, verification and long-term memory into a single evidence-based trajectory.

  • ORION is not a system of total control; access is based on roles, goals and legal grounds.
  • The ORION does not make critical decisions autonomously; AI forms recommendations, alternatives, and warnings.
  • ORION does not declare symbolic designs to be physical laws; symbolism serves as the language of project assembly and communication.

5. Formula 22:22

The dot in the name means the relation of conformity. The left side is 22 mandatory functions of the holistic system. The right side is 22 results by which you can prove that functions do not exist on paper. Each pair receives the owner, data source, calculation method, tolerance threshold, update frequency, and verification procedure.

Operational formula for connectivity: O = C × D × E × T, where C is the connectivity of participants and objects, D is the reliability of data, E is the ability to execute, and T is trust and legitimacy. The multiplicative entry emphasizes that the critical failure of one component nullifies the practical value of the others. This is a management evaluation model, not a physical law.

The result formula for each pair: Rᵢ = Fᵢ × Qᵢ × Vᵢ, where Fᵢ — Maturity of function, Qᵢ — Data quality, Vᵢ — Level of independent confirmation. Values can be normalized on a scale 0–1 or 0–100 After approval of the method.

6. Ecosystem and role distribution

ContourMain roleMain productLimit of responsibility
EQUILIBRIUMObservation, analysis, forecast and balanceModels, indices, scenarios, warningsIt does not substitute for a political and legal decision
SFERAInitiatives, people, knowledge and cooperationShowcase of opportunities, teams, communicationDoes not manage resources without authority
ECO-PPAResource mobilization for measurable impactTransaction structure, stages, covenants, resultDoes not replace the bank, budget or investor
SPECZASHCHITACo-operative executionConsortiums, production, implementation, serviceWorks under the contract and the result passport
KRISTALL741Classification and Modular CompatibilityCodes, connections and module profiles for 19×13Not evidence without data and validation
Heritage archiveMemory, origin and rightsVersions, documents, authorship, lessons, limitationsComplies with access modes and storage periods
IACSolution assembly and situational coordinationReports, options, instructions, feedback controlDoes not concentrate authority outside the approved mandate

ORION is located above individual products as an agreement on language, data, routes, and evidence. It provides a transition between contours, but retains the legal independence of organizations, information systems and resource owners.

7. Five layers of architecture

LayerQuestionCompositionWithdrawal
1. MeaningWhy and for whom?Values, mission, goals, limitations, social contractMap of goals and unacceptable consequences
2. KnowledgeWhat do we know?Registers, data, documents, graphs, models, base lineVerified status picture
3. DecisionWhat to choose?Scenarios, criteria, expertise, risk, authorityReasonable decision and route
4. ActionWho and how will do it?Projects, contracts, finance, production, implementationResult in the territory or object
5. MemoryWhat to save and change?Verification, versions, lessons, rights, replicationUpdated rules and scalable model

The layers are not consistent departments. It works like a closed cycle. The change in actual state returns to the knowledge layer; new information changes scenarios; the verified result adjusts strategic goals and rules.

8. Twenty-two functional contours

№FunctionPurposeWithdrawal
1Mission and valuesDefines a public purpose, addressees and ethical boundariesProject Charter
2Strategic objectivesLink initiatives to long-term priorities and measurable challengesTree of Purpose
3Threats and opportunitiesIdentifying risks, windows of opportunity and cross-industry dependenciesMap of risks and opportunities
4Registries and identifiersProvides unambiguous description of objects, rights, data and subjectsPass-through passport
5Semantic connectivityConstructs a graph of concepts, causes, goals, projects and resultsGraph of meanings
6Data and IntegrationDetermines the sources, quality, exchange, versions and originCatalog and passport data
7Digital twinsDisplays the state of the territory, object, system and scriptsCurrent status model
8Forecast and scenariosCompares trajectories, thresholds, consequences and uncertaintyScenario report
9Initiatives and teamsRegisters the idea, author, problem, command and resource requestInitiative profile
10Examination and validationVerifies scientific, legal, environmental and social viabilityConclusion on admission
11Science and R & DLink hypothesis, testing, law and technological readinessRoute of R&D
12Production cooperationForming the supply chain, seriality, service and responsibilityMap of cooperation
13Finance & ECO-PPACombines effect, risk, stages, capital and contractFinancial model of the project
14Law and standardsDefines regulatory grounds, regimes and compatibility criteriaRequirements Matrix
15Territories and PilotsSelects the site, base line, operator and implementation planPilot's passport
16Human capitalForms roles, competencies, employment, mentoring and trainingCompetence map
17Culture and educationConnects identity, knowledge, participation and intergenerational transmissionCultural and educational program
18Nature and biocenosesMeasuring the state of ecosystems and guiding recovery measuresTerritory Index
19Safety and resilienceManages failures, crises, cyber risk and backupsContinuity plan
20International cooperationCreates compatible rules for projects, data and mutual recognitionOutline of partnership
21Evidence and reportingFixes the baseline, result, additional effects and harmVerified report
22Memory and ScalingSaves versions, lessons, rights and conditions of safe replicationMultiplier Package

9. Twenty-two measurable results

№ResultIndicatorEvidence
1A single charter was adoptedPercentage of signatories to the charter; number of unresolved value conflictsProtocol and version of the document
2A portfolio of goals is formedPercentage of initiatives linked to target, deadline, owner and indicatorRegister of objectives
3Early warning worksRisk coverage, average detection time, share of spent signalsEvent Log
4Objects have a pass-through passportCompleteness of required fields, percentage of duplicates eliminatedRegister audit
5Links are tracedProportion of sites with proven causal and legal relationshipsCount Control
6The data is suitable for the solutionCompleteness, relevance, accuracy, origin, availabilityQuality Passport
7Digital double is relevantCoverage of key parameters and delay in updatingMatching with observations
8The forecast is checkedAdvance horizon, accuracy, uncertainty intervalsBack-testing
9Ideas go to passportsConversion of the application in the passport, the time of routing, the quality of the equipmentRegister of initiatives
10The examination is timelyTerm of imprisonment, percentage of eliminated comments, conflict of interestExpert Trace
11Technology increases maturityTransition between levels of readiness, testing and lawTest report
12The partnership is ready for a seriesShare of confirmed capacity, critical dependencies, serviceChain audit
13Funding is related to impactPercentage of stage funding and Covenants implementedFinancial monitoring
14Requirements are metCompleteness of the correspondence matrix and number of critical deviationsCompliance-audit
15The pilot had a measurable effect.Change against the baseline taking into account external factorsIndependent verification
16The team has competencesClosing role deficits, training, retention and mentoringCompetency Matrix
17People participate meaningfullyCoverage, feedback quality, accessibility and intergenerational participationSocial assessment
18The state of biocenosis is improvingConsolidated index of water, air, soil, species and loadEnvironmental monitoring
19The system is resistant to failuresRecovery time, reserving, exercises, critical incidentsSustainability Report
20Partnerships are compatibleNumber of agreements in force, joint pilots and recognized methodologiesRegister of cooperation
21Effect ProvenPercentage of results with baseline, methodology, data and independent conclusionESG-IR / Impact report
22The solution is replicated safelyNumber of re-implementations, cost of adaptation, lessons savedScaling Package

10. Life cycle of initiative

A single route eliminates premature transition to funding or public promise. At each stage, the minimum set of grounds is checked; a return to the previous step is considered a normal quality mechanism, not a failure.

StepStageThe control questionWithdrawal
1Signal CaptureProblem, opportunity, author, source, addresseeSignal card
2Initiative profilePurpose, object, rights, command, data, restrictionsPassport version 0.1
3BindingGoals, registries, technologies, territories, partnersLinks graph
4EvaluationScience, law, ecology, risk, economy, social effectConclusion on the route
5Consortium AssemblyCustomer, operator, manufacturers, verifier, financingRole agreement
6PilotBase line, plan, stages, control, stop rightMeasured result
7VerificationCausality, Complementarity, Harm, Cost, SustainabilityIndependent opinion
8Scaling and memoryAdaptation, standardization, circulation, lessons, versionsMultiplier Package

Minimum passport of the initiative

  • ID, title, author and origin history;
  • problem, target group, territory and target;
  • Measurable target, baseline, indicators and horizon;
  • rights to results, data, technologies and materials;
  • team, competence gaps and potential partners;
  • risks, restrictions, unacceptable consequences and the right to stop;
  • Pilot plan, resources, funding sources and scaling criteria.

11. Digital Core and Data Architecture

The digital core is built as a federal environment. The data remains with the rightful owners, and ORION stores metadata, links, permitted representations and proof of origin. Only those sets are centralized for which it is legitimate, safe and economically justified.

ComponentFunctionKey rule
Federal CatalogueFinds sets, documents, models and servicesOwner and access mode are required
Identifier RegistryLinks industry and territorial codesNo silent association of entities
Knowledge GraphStores concepts, links, bases and versionsFact, Hypothesis, and Evaluation Differ
Bus of eventsTransfers changes and warnings between systemsSubscriptions, Logging and Delivery Control
Storage of evidenceFixes source data, calculations, protocols and signaturesInvariability of versions and verifiable origin
Digital twinsCombine observations, models and scenariosThe model always marks uncertainty.
AI-assistantSearch, comparison, forecast, explanation and preparation of optionsPeople make critical decisions.
Portal SFERAProvides role-playing jobs and public presentationsMinimization of data and availability of the interface

12. The Meaning Graph and KRISTALL741

The meaning graph answers the question “how is everything connected?”, while KRISTALL741 answers “how can everything be classified and assembled in modules?”. Together they form a navigation framework: the graph stores relationships and causal chains, while the 19×13 matrix gives a stable address to a function, object, indicator or technology within the shared system.

ElementIn the graphIN KRISTALL741Joint effect
GoalRelationships to problems, addressees and consequencesClass code and system levelExclusion of duplicate and conflicting goals
ProjectTeam, Resources, Dependencies, ResultsCompatibility module and passportQuick assembly of the portfolio and consortium
IndicatorCause, method, source and effectIndicator code and rangeComparability of reports
TechnologyRights, tests, objects of applicationFunctional ModuleReuse without losing context
RiskTriggers, Consequences, Owners and MeasuresThreat class and protection contourEarly warning and reaction route

The code does not replace the description, and the connection does not replace the proof. Any automatic classification must be explainable, verifiable, and allow for human correction while preserving the version history.

13. Digital twin of territory and system

The digital twin of ORION reflects not only physical objects, but also institutional connections, resources, commitments, environmental status and social impacts. It is designed for scenario comparison and early warning, not to replace reality with a model.

Contour of the doubleObserved statusScenario question
NatureAir, water, soil, biodiversity, climatic and man-made loadsWhat measures reduce risk without transferring harm?
InfrastructureFacilities, networks, capacities, wear, availability and redundancyWhere does critical dependence occur?
EconomyResource flows, employment, supply chains, life cycle costWhich scenario is sustainable when conditions change?
SocietyDemography, accessibility, participation, trust, competenceWho wins, who bears the risk and how to compensate for it?
ManagementPowers, terms, contracts, indicators, execution of ordersWhere is the solution blocked and what role is missing?
  • The baseline is fixed before the intervention and includes a range of natural variability.
  • The model shows confidence intervals, assumptions and quality of input data.
  • After the pilot, the prediction is compared with the fact; errors return to the model and methodology.

14. Management model

Organ / roleCredentialsKey output
Strategic CouncilMission, borders, priorities, admission of large programsApproved course and portfolio
IAC ORIONSituational analysis, solutions, control of orders and feedbackReport and route of the decision
Architectural officeOntology, Passports, Integrations, Version and Compatibility RulesArchitectural standards
Data BoardQuality, Access, Security, Origin and Intersystem ExchangePassport and data permission
Scientific and Expert CouncilMethods, hypotheses, tests, independence of examinationConclusion and conditions of admission
Finance and Investment CommitteeRisk, stages, covenants, sources and structure of the transactionDecision on financing
Operator SPECZASHCHITAConsortium, production, implementation, service and labor protectionAn accomplished pilot
Independent VerifierBaseline, result, additionality, harm and sustainabilityVerification opinion
Public and Ethical OutlineRights, availability, feedback, conflict of interestRecommendations and stop signals

15. Economy and mechanism ECO-PPA

The ORION economy separates the cost of the platform from the cost of projects. The basic outline finances architecture, data, methodologies, integration, and portfolio management. The project outline collects individual deals and budgets for specific pilots. This prevents system-wide costs from being mixed with the commercial and budgetary obligations of participants.

ContourWhat is fundedSourceCondition
ArchitectureOntology, passports, integration, security, methodsBudget, grant, development institute, consortiumOpen rules and compatibility
DataMonitoring, baseline, quality, storage and exchangeData Owner, Region, Project, PartnersLegal basis and measurable value
PilotEquipment, works, training, operation and inspectionECO-PPA, PPP, Contract, Investments, Trust FundsStages, Covenants and the Right to Stop
ScaleSeries, localization, service, replicationOrder, project financing, license, franchisingConfirmed effect and serial readiness
MemoryArchive, standards, training, reusePart of the portfolio budget and service modelAccessibility of lessons and preservation of rights

Principles ECO-PPA

  • capital is provided in stages after the achievement of the audited conditions;
  • The cash flow and the socio-ecological effect are accounted for separately, but are related in one model;
  • non-financial indicator does not turn into money automatically: a legal object of the transaction, counterparty, price and settlement infrastructure are necessary;
  • risks, reserves, insurance and liability are fixed before the pilot starts;
  • A report on failures and side effects is a mandatory part of the evidence environment.

16. Law, standards and compatibility

ORION is implemented through a package of interrelated documents. The concept does not replace regulations, contracts or industry standards, but defines a minimum common framework so that the decisions of different participants are comparable and verifiable.

DocumentPurposePriority of preparation
Regulation on ORION22:22Status, mission, authorities, authority and boundariesZero cycle
Life Cycle Regulation InitiativeStages, tolerances, returns, stop and archiveZero cycle
Single Passport InitiativesFields, Identifiers, Versions, Rights and EvidenceZero cycle
Data PolicyPossession, access, quality, origin, safety and retention periodsPilot
Methodology 22 indicatorsFormulas, sources, thresholds, periodicity and responsibilityPilot
Validation StandardIndependence, conflict of interest, methods and form of detentionPilot
Consortium model agreementRoles, rights, resources, responsibilities, outcomes and outcomesPilot
Scaling PackageCriteria for series, adaptation, licensing, service and trainingAfter verification
  • Compatibility is more important than total unification: industry models are preserved, but must have a correspondence table to the common passport.
  • Evidence is more important than the scope of the report: each conclusion must be traced back to the source, method, version, and person responsible.
  • International application requires a separate legal assessment of data transfer, sanctions, export, tax and environmental regimes.

17. People, culture and education

ORION is created for the ability of a person and society to act meaningfully in a complex environment. Therefore, human capital is not seen as a serving resource of the platform, but as an independent result: competence, subjectivity, health, safety, access to knowledge, participation and the ability to transfer experience.

LevelTaskTools
PersonUnderstand the purpose, role, rights, risks and next stepPersonal account, training, mentor, understandable recommendations
TeamGather complementary competencies and agree on responsibilityMap of roles, deficits, conflicts and mutual commitments
CommunityParticipate in selection, observation and feedbackSFERA, public panels, civil science, initiative budgeting
InstitutePreserve knowledge and improve the quality of solutionsAcademy, standards, archive, practice reviews and certification
GenerationsTransfer heritage, lessons and responsibility for the futureIntergenerational projects, expeditions, family and territorial archives

18. Safety, Ethics and Red Lines

RiskMandatory restrictionMonitoring
Concentration of powerDivision of roles, decision log, independent oversightAudit of powers and conflicts of interest
Opaque AIProhibition of autonomous critical decisions; explanation and appealModel audit and human approval
Data leakage or abuseMinimization, encryption, role access and localization by lawAccess Log and Protection Testing
Manipulation of societyProhibition of hidden influence and profiling beyond legal groundsEthical Expertise and Public Control
Environmental damageImpact assessment, principle of not causing significant harm, stoppageIndependent monitoring and baseline
Technological dependenceOpen interfaces, data portability, backup providersExit plan and recovery test
False evidenceSeparation of fact, hypothesis, estimate and forecastReproduction of calculations and verification
Symbolic substitution of scienceClear labeling of metaphors, copyright models and scientifically confirmed patternsEditorial and scientific control

Security is designed before integration, not added after launch. For each category of data and solutions, a mode, minimum composition, shelf life, risk owner, incident scenario and recovery procedure are established.

19. The First Pilots' Portfolio

PilotPurposeFirst Proven Result
GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”Aerospace monitoring and early warningThreat Map and Confirmed Response Rules
Biocenosis monitoring pointDigital sense of territoryBaseline and Ecosystem Status Index
Ecomodules and small generationLocal sustainability of infrastructureMeasured resource efficiency and reliability
Materials Science6N alumina, soil stabilisation and low-carbon solutionsTests, rights, serial route and customer
Transport and industrial contourLinkage of materials, production, logistics and new high-speed systemsInter-industry pilot's passport
Heritage Preservation ArchiveOrigin, rights, preservation and access to valuesProof Chain and Storage Mode
Culture of a New OrderIntergenerational participation, knowledge and creative practicesPortfolio of cultural initiatives with effect
Social MarketplaceComparison of needs, initiatives, funds and implementersTransparent routing of social assistance
City of Knowledge / City of EventsTerritory of education, science, culture and tourismIntegrated master plan and operator model
Elemental ManagementMonitoring, adaptation and restoration of the Earth, Water, Air, FireVerified system of natural safety
Rehabilitation and personnel "Superclass"Return of the person to health, work and social roleIndividual trajectory and confirmed result
International cooperationJoint standards, projects and evidence sharingPilot of mutual recognition of methods

The portfolio does not start simultaneously. The first 3–5 pilots are selected based on availability of data, team, site, rights, funding and independent verification. ORION must prove its usefulness on a limited number of real-world tasks.

20. Pilot and road map

Zero cycle: the first 100 days

PeriodActionWithdrawalCompletion criterion
Days 1–20Approve the mandate, architectural group, pilot theme and territoryLaunch decisionDesignated owners and boundaries
Days 21–45Collect registers, passports, base line, rights and participant cardSource data packageCritical gaps are known
Days 46–70Build a graph, a prototype workplace and an initiative routeMVP navigationOne initiative goes full digital route
Days 71–100Form a consortium, pilot plan, budget, risks and verificationPilot's passport 1.0Preparedness for funding decision

Road map 36 months

StageTimeframeResultCheckpoint
0. Design0–3 monthsPosition, Architecture, Passports, Pilot and TeamLaunch decision
1. MVP3–6 monthsCatalog, graph, jobs, data and first routeFull cycle demonstration
2. Pilot6–12 monthsReal implementation and measurement in the territoryThe Independent Report
3. Portfolio12–24 months3–5 related pilots, standards and financial modelPortfolio solution
4. Zoom24–36 monthsCirculation by territories and industriesNational implementation package

21. Validation, maturity and scale tolerance

Maturity is assessed on five levels. The resulting high score does not cover critical violations of rights, safety, ecology or evidence. Scaling requires at least a 3 layer for key functions and no red constraints.

LevelStateSignPermissible action
0Not statedNo owner, data and mechanismStudy of the problem
1DescribedThere is a concept and responsible, but no verifiable practiceDesign and data collection
2CollectedHave a passport, model, team, rights and plan of the pilotLimited pilot
3VerifiedPilot complete, result and risks independently verifiedManaged replication
4InstitutionalizedThe solution is repeated, standardized and teaches the systemScale and international compatibility

Questions of independent verifier

  1. Was the baseline defined prior to the intervention?
  2. Is it possible to relate the change to the actions of the project, and not only to external factors?
  3. Is the effect additional to the usual scenario?
  4. Has harm been shifted to another territory, group, period or component of nature?
  5. Are the costs, rights, purchases and data in line with the approved passport?
  6. Does the impact continue after funding is completed and conditions change?

22. Launch solution and manifest

To move from concept to action, it is proposed to approve a limited zero cycle without prematurely deploying a national platform. Its task is to prove the operability of the principle 22:22 on one full route of the initiative and to prepare a package of solutions for the pilot.

  1. Adopt the concept as a working basis for discussion;
  2. appoint a result customer, coordinator and architectural office;
  3. choose one pilot territory and one priority initiative;
  4. agree on data owners, independent verifier and legal boundaries;
  5. prepare a zero-cycle estimate and project financing for the pilot;
  6. After 100 days, present a demonstration of the full route and a decision on the next stage.

Manifesto

We connect meaning to evidence, data to responsibility, resources to result.

We are not building a center that replaces everyone; we are creating a common language that allows everyone to act in concert.

We recognize uncertainty, we preserve the right to stop and consider mistakes to be a source of development if they are honestly recorded.

We protect human dignity, the living systems of the Earth, cultural heritage and the freedom of future generations.

We scale only what has passed the real test and can be understood, repeated and improved.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • ORION22:22

Annex. Key terms

TermDefinition
Base LineFixed state before the intervention, taking into account natural variability.
VerificationIndependent verification of data, method, result and significant side effects.
Graph of meaningsA related model of concepts, goals, causes, actors, projects, risks, and outcomes.
ComplementaryPart of the effect that wouldn't have occurred in a normal scenario without the project.
KRISTALL741The author’s 19×13 classification and modular core for addressing system elements.
Initiative profileStructured record of origin, purpose, rights, data, team, resources, risks and outcome criteria.
Multiplier PackageA set of standards, rights, instructions, models, training and adaptation conditions for a proven solution.
End-to-end identifierStable code that connects representations of a single object in different systems.
Digital twinAn updated model of an object or territory that connects observations, rules, and scenarios.
ECO-PPAMechanism of combining resources and obligations for measurable socio-ecological result.
ESG-IRThe scope of evidence, reporting, validation and impact assessment in the project ecosystem.
The Red LineA condition under which the initiative is not allowed to continue until critical risk is eliminated.

This document is a draft strategic concept and does not create legal, financial or budgetary obligations in itself. All pilots are subject to separate legal, financial, scientific, environmental and technical expertise.

Other published edition: ORION22:22 ORION_22-22_Strategic_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

Joint Register Intelligent Operational Navigation

METAARCHITECTURE OF CIVILIZATION PROJECT

22 functions ↔ 22 measurable results

Strategic Concept • Version 1.0

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov • SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

25 August 2026

Why do we need Orion?

ORION 22:22

02 / 22

The main gap arises not in design, but between meaning, registry, resource, execution and proof.

Different IDs

No refund

Lessons

STRONG

IDEA

RESULT

NOT PROVIDED

No owner

Results

Documents • data • budgets • pilots • reports

ORION creates controlled connectivity — the ability of a system to bring a solution to a confirmed effect.

Name and working definition

ORION 22:22

03 / 22

ORION is a suprasystem communication circuit, not a total control system.

United

Federal connectivity without destroying autonomy

Roster

common passports, identifiers and exchange rules

Intelligent

analytics, graphs, prediction and AI under human control

Operating

decision routes, roles, timelines, risks and quality of execution

Navigation

current state, target course and next responsible step

Does not replace state bodies, data owners, scientific expertise, court or project operator.

22 FUNCTIONS

ORION 22:22

04 / 22

Formula 22:22

A colon means structural correspondence: no function without a measurable result.

22

RESULTS

Owner

Data

Tolerance

Who is responsible for the function and the result

Source, Quality, Version and Origin

threshold, periodicity and independent verification

Ri = Fi × Qi × Vi

Ecosystem and role distribution

ORION 22:22

05 / 22

ORION is located above individual products as an agreement on language, routes and evidence.

IAC

variants • coordination

EQUILIBRIUM

observation • forecast

ECO-PPA

resources • covenants

ORION

22:22

SFERA

initiatives • people

SPECZASHCHITA

• Service

KRISTALL741

codes • compatibility

Heritage archive

Right • Version • Lessons

Federality: systems retain legal and technical autonomy.

Five layers of architecture

ORION 22:22

06 / 22

Layers form a closed cycle: the confirmed result changes knowledge, goals and rules.

Mission • Objectives • Limitations • Social Contract

1. MEANING

Why and for whom?

registers • data • graphs • model • base line

2. KNOWLEDGE

What do we know?

Scenario • Examination • Risk •

3. DECISION

What to choose?

projects • contracts • finances • production

4. ACTION

Who and how will do it?

verification • version • lessons • replication

5. MEMORY

What to save and change?

22 Functional Circuit

ORION 22:22

07 / 22

The full set of functions is collected into five management groups - from meaning to memory.

COURSE

RELATIONSHIP

Assembly

ADDRESS

TRUST

Mission and values

Registers and ID

Initiatives

Right

Resilience

Strategic objectives

Semantics

Expertise

Territories

Partnerships

Threats and opportunities

Data

Science

Capital

Evidence

Doubles

Cooperation

Culture

Memory

Forecast

Finance

Nature

The system is considered complete only if all 22 functions are available - even if they are implemented by different organizations.

22 measurable results

ORION 22:22

08 / 22

Right-hand side 22:22 translates architecture from description to proof system.

COURSE

DATA

PORTFOLIO

TERRITORY

MASSHTAB

The Single Charter

Pass-through passport

Idea in the passport

Requirements are met

Resilience

Portfolio of goals

Connections are visible

Examination on time

The Pilot Effect

Compatibility

Early warning

Data is suitable

Maturity is growing

Competent team

Effect Proven

Double is relevant

Serial cooperation

Meaningful participation

Safe circulation

The forecast is checked

Finance ↔ effect

Biocenosis is better

Each result receives an indicator, a data source, a calculation method, an admission threshold, and an independent confirmation.

Matrix 22:22 • pairs 1–11

ORION 22:22

09 / 22

Each function has a verifiable output — and no pair lives without a data owner.

FUNCTION

MEASURABLE RESULT

Mission and values

A single charter was adopted

Strategic objectives

A portfolio of goals is formed

Threats and opportunities

Early warning works

Registries and identifiers

Objects have a pass-through passport

Semantic connectivity

Links are traced

Data and Integration

The data is suitable for the solution

Digital twins

Digital double is relevant

Forecast and scenarios

The forecast is checked

Initiatives and teams

Ideas go to passports

Examination and validation

The examination is timely

Science and R & D

Technology increases maturity

Matrix 22:22 • pairs 12–22

ORION 22:22

10 / 22

Each function has a verifiable output — and no pair lives without a data owner.

FUNCTION

MEASURABLE RESULT

Production cooperation

The partnership is ready for a series

Finance & ECO-PPA

Funding is related to impact

Law and standards

Requirements are met

Territories and Pilots

The pilot had a measurable effect.

Human capital

The team has competences

Culture and education

People participate meaningfully

Nature and biocenoses

The state of biocenosis is improving

Safety and resilience

The system is resistant to failures

International cooperation

Partnerships are compatible

Evidence and reporting

Effect Proven

Memory and Scaling

The solution is replicated safely

Life cycle of initiative

ORION 22:22

11 / 22

A single route eliminates the premature transition to funding, promise, or scale.

1 Signal

Card

2 Passport

Version 0.1

3 Bondage

Count

4 Rating

route

8 Scale and memory

Package

7 Verification

Conclusion

6 Pilot

effect

5 Consortium

Roles

Returning to the previous step is a normal quality mechanism, not a failure.

Digital Core and Data Architecture

ORION 22:22

12 / 22

Federated environment: data remains with the rightful owners, ORION stores links, metadata and proof of origin.

DIGITAL NUCLEAR ORION

DATA OWNER

Registries

Territories

Projects

Science

Partners

PRODUCTS SOLUTIONS

Profile

Digital twin

Forecast

Route

Impact Report

Federal Catalogue

Identifier Registry

Knowledge Graph

Bus of events

Storage of evidence

AI ASSISTANT: search • forecast • explanation

Critical decisions are approved by the person.

The Meaning Graph and KRISTALL741

ORION 22:22

13 / 22

The graph answers "how everything is connected", the matrix 19×13 — "how to classify and assemble everything modularly".

GRAPH OF MEANING

KRISTALL741

PURPOSE

COMMUNICATIONS

↔

ADDRESS

19 classes

RESULT

RISK

PROJECT

Subject

13 levels

19 × 13 = 247 stable addresses

Digital twin of territory and system

ORION 22:22

14 / 22

The double connects the observed state, rules and scenarios - without substituting reality for a model.

OFFICE: powers • terms • contracts • indicators

NATURE

water • air • soil • species

ECONOMY

Resources • Employment • Chain

DIGITAL

DOUBLE

INFRASTRUCTURE

objects • networks • reservations

SOCIETY

participation • trust • competence

Base line → script → fact → model update

Management model

ORION 22:22

15 / 22

The powers are distributed; the right to stop is separated from the right to finance and execute.

COURSE

ARCHITECTURE

TRUST

Strategic Council

mission • boundaries • priorities

IAC + Architectural Office

Version • Integration •

Verifier + ethical contour

base line • damage • rights

Data Board

Scientific Council

Finance Committee

Operator SPECZASHCHITA

STOP LAW: Critical risk to life, rights, ecology, data or infrastructure suspends the initiative.

Economy and mechanism ECO-PPA

ORION 22:22

16 / 22

It is not a promise that is funded, but a step-by-step route to a verifiable socio-ecological effect.

PASSPORT

EFFECTA

Objective

base line

indicator

1

Condition

2

Verification

3

Tranche

4

Next stage

Sources: budget • grant • PPP • contract • investment • trust funds

Architecture

Data

Pilot

Scale

Memory

Open rules

Value and law

Stages and Covenants

Confirmed effect

Law and Lessons

Cash flow and effect are accounted for separately, but are linked in a single evidence model.

Law, security and ethics

ORION 22:22

17 / 22

Red lines are designed before integration — and are not overlapped by a high final score.

DOES NOT REPLACE

DOES NOT DECIDE AUTONOMOUSLY

DO NOT GIVE A METAPHOR FOR SCIENCE

state, court, expert, data owner

critical issues of life, rights, ecology and infrastructure

fact, hypothesis, estimate and forecast are marked separately

Roles and conflicts of interest

Audit of Authority

Minimization and encryption

Access Log

Baseline and harm

Independent monitoring

Open interfaces

Exit and Recovery Plan

Red lines: life • dignity • rights • ecology • data • critical infrastructure

The First Pilots' Portfolio

ORION 22:22

18 / 22

The first 3–5 pilots are selected based on availability of data, command, site, rights and independent verification.

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Biocenous point

Eco-modules

Threat Map and Response Regulations

baseline and ecosystem index

resource efficiency and reliability

Materials Science

Heritage archive

Rehabilitation "Superclass"

Tests, rights and serial route

origin, rights and storage regime

individual trajectory and effect

Portfolio rule: first prove your own usefulness ORION on a limited number of real tasks.

Zero cycle: the first 100 days

ORION 22:22

19 / 22

The goal is not to build a national platform, but to prove one full digital route of the initiative.

01–20

21–45

46–70

71–100

MANDATE

REFERENCE DATA

MVP NAVIGATIONS

PILOT PASSPORT

Group • topic • territory

Registers • passport • base line

Count • Workplace • Route

consortium • budget • risks • verification

Launch decision

Critical gaps are known

One initiative goes through a cycle

readiness for financing

MONITORING POINT 100

Demonstration of the full route + decision on the next stage

Road map 36 months

ORION 22:22

20 / 22

Scale begins after independent verification, not after a technology demonstration.

0–3 months

6–12 months

24–36 months

DESIGN

PILOT

MASSHTAB

Position • Architecture • Passport

real implementation and measurement

Replication • compatibility • training

3–6 months

12–24 months

MVP

PORTFOLIO

catalog • graph • data • route

3–5 pilots • standards • finance

STARTING RULES

First, one complete route and one measurable territorial result. Then there are new modules, integrations and participants.

Solution required for launch

ORION 22:22

21 / 22

A limited zero cycle with a fixed mandate, one territory and one priority initiative is proposed.

Approve the concept as a working basis

Appoint a result customer and a coordinator

PROPOSED

DECISION

Choose a territory and initiative

Agree data owners and verifier

Create an interdisciplinary architectural group ORION22:22 and appoint the IAC as a focal point of the zero cycle.

Prepare estimates and funding

After 100 days decide on the next stage

Zero-cycle output: demonstration of route + solution package for pilot.

Launch Manifesto

ORION 22:22

22 / 22

Combine meaning with proof, data with responsibility, resources with result.

We create a common language, not a center that replaces everyone.

We keep the right to stop and honestly fix uncertainty and errors.

We protect human dignity, the living systems of the Earth and cultural heritage.

We scale only what is tested, understood, repeated and improved.

Next step: approve the zero cycle

and show the route in 100 days.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Sources cited in presentation 1

  • Author's concept "ORION22:22", version 1.0, 25.08.2026.

Other published edition: ORION22:22 ORION_22-22_Strategic_concept.docx · Web Text +

Civilized operating systems

Unification of the classifier

22 Axles • 19 Human Standards • 260 Destiny Indicators • separate matrix 260 Kinov

Normative and conceptual project | Revision 2.0 | 30 August 2026

Passport Solutions

ParameterContents
NameORION22:22 - Unified Register Intelligent Operational Navigation
SubjectFederal unification of classifiers, metadata, indicators and symbolic systems without loss of autonomy of the original schemes
Formula 22:2222 orthogonal classification axes ↔ 22 verifiable management results
Human-centric contourSRCh 1.0: 19 standards and exactly 260 indicators of conditions, opportunities and confirmed results
Symbolic outlineBook of Kins: 20 archetypes × 13 tones = 260 coordinates; it is not a system for ranking or predicting personality
StatusProject for interdepartmental, scientific, technological, business and public discussion
PrincipleThe environment is standardized, not the individual. The dignity of a person does not depend on the score, profile or code.

Decision. Do not create one worldwide "supercode". ORION preserves sovereign classifiers and adds a common layer of persistent identifiers, concepts, versions, crosswalk, origin, and independent verification.

Brief summary

  • ORION connects five layers - Meaning, Knowledge, Solution, Action and Memory - into the testable circuit "data → digital twin → solution → action → effect → proof".
  • “Thinking flow” is the dynamic of this circuit: observation turns into context, concept, hypothesis, scenario, and solution proposal; after human authority, action and effect are brought back to memory as verified knowledge.
  • 22 axes answer different questions and do not replace each other. Language, version, source, trust, and alignment status are common meta-information, not complementary axes.
  • SRCh 1.0 is connected as a profile of the individual and the environment: 19 standards form the normative framework, while 260 indicators form the measurement register. The technical name is “life trajectory indicators”; the name presented to users is “Destiny indicators”.
  • Matrix 260 Kins are stored separately as a symbolic system 20×13. Its coordinates can describe the role of the record or the cycle phase, but do not confirm causality and are not used for automated decisions about rights, access or resources.

Contents

  • 1. Strategic objective and boundaries
  • 2. Five Layer Orion
  • 3. Register 22 axes
  • 4. Metamodel concepts and identifiers
  • 5. Crosswalk and Federation of Circuits
  • 6. SRCh 1.0: 19 standards and 260 Destiny indicators
  • 7. Book of Kins: a separate framework of 20×13
  • 8. Governance, security and ethics
  • 9. Technological architecture
  • 10. Road map
  • 11. Benchmarks 22:22
  • Annex A. Register 260 indicators
  • Annex B. Sources

1. Strategic objective and boundaries

Civilizational systems use thousands of legal, statistical, industry, scientific and local classifiers. Their direct merging destroys the context: the same words denote different concepts, the same codes change the meaning between versions, and close categories are not always identical.

1.1. What is Unified

  • identity of the concept and its constant URI;
  • Definitions, preferred and alternative designations in different languages
  • scheme-owner, version, status and validity period;
  • hierarchical and associative links;
  • typed correspondences between schemes;
  • source, author, validator, conversion rule and proof;
  • access rights, license and storage period.

1.2. What is not enforced

  • legal force and substantive autonomy of the original classifier;
  • cultural differences in terms and local meanings;
  • person as a person - conditions, roles, events and verifiable statements are encoded, but not dignity;
  • symbolic interpretation - it is stored as a separate layer and is not disguised as an empirical dimension.

Critical boundary. closeMatch never automatically rises to exactMatch; meaningful proximity is not equal to legal or statistical equivalence.

2. Five Layer Orion

The ORION working model associates meaning with measurable action and stores the entire chain in memory. Each layer has its own type of objects and control question.

Table 1 - Five-layer model

LayerPurposeThe main questionContours
MeaningValues, needs, goals, effect recipientsWhy and for whom?SFERA; Strategic Council
KnowledgeDomains, entities, entities, territory, timeWhat, who, where and when?KRISTALL741; EQUILIBRIUM
DecisionStatus, indicators, scenarios, risks, act of choiceWhat happens and what is chosen?EQUILIBRIUM; ECO-PPA
ActionCapacities, processes, initiatives, resources, suppliesHow and by what to perform?SFERA; ECO-PPA; SPECZASHCHITA
MemoryRecords, origin, rights and custodyWhat is proved and how to preserve?Heritage archive; KRISTALL741

Checkable contour. value → concept → code → Approval → solution → Action → effect → Proof → Memory Version

2.1. Thought Flow

Working definition of the project: The thinking stream is a continuous, versionable and evidence-based trajectory of converting signals into meaningful actions and new results into updated knowledge. It is not an autonomous subject or a substitute for human responsibility: AI forms hypotheses, alternatives and warnings, and the critical decision is made by an authorized person or collegiate body.

PhaseConversionResultMonitoring
1. Monitoring→ dated fact signalSIT + PRVsource, quality, time
2. Understandingfact → concept and contextDOM/OBJ/GEO/TIMSchema version, definition
3. HypothesisContext → Explanationversioned statementreason, confidence, refutability
4. ScenarioHypothesis →SCN + RSKalternatives, assumptions, risks
5. Proposaloptions → draft decisionDEC-candidaterights, values, consequences
6. CredentialsProject → Authorized SolutionDEC-approvedperson, mandate, digital confirmation
7. ActionSolution → Process and DeliveryPRC/INI/DELresource, owner, acceptance criteria
8. VerificationEffect → Proven ResultIND + PRVindependent verification
9. Memoryresult → new version of knowledgeREC + RGTarchive, rights, lesson, return to stream

Profile code: OR22/PRC/ORION.FLOW/THINKINGx1.0. Any transition saves input, output, author/agent, time, version, and proof.

3. Register 22 axes classification

The axis is considered orthogonal if it asks an independent question and allows for an independent value. The record is not required to fill all 22 axes: the object profile defines the required and permissible edges.

Meaning

№CodeAxisThe only questionVerified result
1VALValue / PrincipleOn what principle is the action based?Value Tracing
2NEENecessity/contradictionWhat regulatory deficit needs to be addressed?Register of Normalized Needs
3GOAPurpose/desired effectWhat state should be achieved?Passport Purpose
4BENRecipient/affected systemFor whom or for what effect is created?Map of effect recipients

Knowledge

№CodeAxisThe only questionVerified result
5DOMSubject areaIn which domain is the object considered?Domain Routing
6OBJObject/Essence TypeWhat is this entity?Canonical type of object
7AGTSubject / roleWho is acting, owning or responding?The Responsibility Matrix
8GEOSpace / TerritoryWhere does the object exist or operate?Territorial compatibility
9TIMTime / CycleWhen and in what cycle is it really?Temporary certainty

Decision

№CodeAxisThe only questionVerified result
10SITSituation/observable stateWhat is actually happening now?Confirmed status snapshot
11INDIndicator/measureHow is the state and change measured?Comparable
12SCNScenario / AlternativeWhat options or actions are being compared?A set of comparable alternatives
13RSKRisk/UncertaintyWhat could change the expected outcome?Risk Map
14DECSolution / Impact ToolWhat is authorized or selected?Machine-readable act of decision

Action

№CodeAxisThe only questionVerified result
15CAPAbility / FunctionWhat should the system be able to do?Map of abilities
16PRCProcess/cycle stageWhat is the repeatable sequence of work?End-to-end process
17INIInitiative / program / projectWhich unit implements the solution?Linked portfolio of initiatives
18RESResource / assetDue to what the action is performed?Checked balance of resources
19DELProduct / Service / DeliveryWhat is produced and accepted?Accepted delivery

Memory

№CodeAxisThe only questionVerified result
20RECRecord / Document / ArtifactIn what form is knowledge or event preserved?Full archive package
21PRVOrigin / proofWhere did this come from and what is confirmed?Chain of Origin
22RGTRights / Access / StorageWho and under what conditions uses and stores the object?Rights and Storage Policy

3.1. Separation of close axes

  • NEE — normative gap; SIT — observed fact.
  • GOA — final effect; DEL — immediate product or service.
  • AGT - performer, owner or responsible; BEN - recipient or carrier of the effect.
  • CAP — a system capability; PRC — a reproducible sequence of operations.
  • DEC - authorization of action; INI - time-limited execution.
  • IND measures the state; PRV proves the origin of the data.
  • TIM describes subject time; version dates refer to system metadata.

4. Metamodel concepts and identifiers

4.1. The minimum card concept

GroupRequired fields
Identityconcept_uid; concept_uri; axis_code; scheme_id
Meaningpreferred_label; alternative_labels; definition; scope_note; language
Connectionsbroader; narrower; related; equivalent; replaces; replaced_by
Versionscheme_release; status; valid_from; valid_to; system_from; system_to
Managementowner; steward; approver; reviewer; change_request
Evidencesource_id; provenance_id; evidence; confidence; verification_status
Rightsaccess_class; license; purpose_limit; retention_rule

4.2. Two Identifier Views

Permanent URI. https://id.orion2222.org/c/{axis}/{scheme}/{concept_uid}

Human Readable Code. OR22/{AXIS}/{SCHEME}/{CODE}x{RELEASE}

Examples: OR22/GEO/UN.M49/356@2026.1; OR22/DOM/UN.ISIC/0111@5.0; OR22/IND/SRCH/01.01@1.0. The version is not permanent UID: renaming does not create a new concept, and semantic separation or merger requires an explicit migration.

4.3. Versioning

  • MAJOR - change of metamodel or meaning with violation of backward compatibility.
  • MINOR - new concepts and compatible relationships.
  • PATCH — correction of labels, descriptions and technical errors without changing the meaning.
  • The published version is immutable; code and UID are not reused.
  • Life Cycle: Draft → Candidate → Approved → Deprecated → Retired.
  • Each release has a signed manifesto, a change log, a migration table, and an impact report.

5. Crosswalk and Federation of Circuits

The basic model is "sovereign schemes + canonical semantic ridge". It reduces the number of pairwise transformations from about N² to about N, keeping direct links where they are legally or statistically binding.

5.1. Types of Correspondence

TypeMeaningAutomatic application
exactEquivalence in a given contextOnly after an independent review
closeproximity without guarantee of interchangeabilitynone
broader / narrowerA broader and narrower conceptby explicit aggregation/decomposition rule
relatedassociative communicationnone
compositecompliance with the formula and conditionswithin the published rule
noMatchConfirmed lack of correct compliancenone

5.2. Crosswalk Card

  • initial and target scheme, version and concept;
  • direction, type and condition of applicability - territory, time, role, unit;
  • conversion rule and test examples;
  • source, justification, author, independent examiner and confidence ratio;
  • object and system time, status and reference to the substituted compliance.

5.3. Quality control

MetricsWhich shows
CoverageProportion of reference concepts with proven conformity
AccuracyExact percentage among verified links
AmbiguityAverage number of permissible goals per initial concept
Loss of detailBroad/composite fraction where the original granularity disappears
Round-tripPercentage of records that retain meaning when converted back and forth
StabilityPercentage of links that did not require revision after the release of the scheme

6. SRCh 1.0: 19 standards and 260 Destiny indicators

Basic principle. Man is a subject of development. The quality of the environment and support is standardized, not the personality. Indicators serve to improve conditions and cannot be used for discrimination, punishment or public ranking.

In ORION, the name “260 Destiny indicators” is retained for users as a meaningful image of a life trajectory. The technical and normative layers use the neutral name “260 indicators of conditions, opportunities and confirmed development results”. Their distribution is fixed: СРЧ-01–СРЧ-13 have 14 indicators each, and СРЧ-14–СРЧ-19 have 13 each; 13×14 + 6×13 = 260.

6.1. Five contours and 19 standards

ContourCodeStandardPurpose
BasisСРЧ-01Dignity and rightsProvides protection of the dignity, rights, freedoms and subjectivity of a person.
BasisСРЧ-02Physical healthProvides health preservation, prevention, treatment and recovery.
BasisСРЧ-03Psychological well-beingProvides mental stability, support and quality of inner life.
BasisСРЧ-04SecurityProvides protection against physical, social, technological and digital threats.
BasisСРЧ-05Healthy environmentProvides access to environmentally friendly living conditions.
FormationСРЧ-06Family and childhoodIt ensures the well-being of the family, parenthood and the full development of the child.
FormationСРЧ-07Lifelong educationProvides continuous development of knowledge, thinking and competencies.
FormationСРЧ-08Culture and worldviewProvides cultural identity, ethical maturity and openness to diversity.
IndependenceСРЧ-09Work and professional implementationProvides decent work, skill and professional self-realization.
IndependenceСРЧ-10Economic independenceProvides sustainable income, financial literacy and resource management.
IndependenceСРЧ-11Housing and living spaceProvides an affordable, safe and developing living space.
IndependenceСРЧ-12Digital subjectivityProvides the rights, security, access and independence of the Human in the digital environment.
CreationСРЧ-13Creativity and innovationProvides the ability to create, research and implement socially useful solutions.
CreationСРЧ-14Social ties and solidarityProvides affiliation, trust, mutual assistance and participation in communities.
CreationСРЧ-15Civic participationProvides informed participation in public life and decision-making.
CreationСРЧ-16Environmental responsibilityEnsures responsible environmental management and ecosystem restoration.
ContinuityСРЧ-17Time and life trajectory managementProvides a balance of roles, time, goals and transitions between life stages.
ContinuityСРЧ-18Meaning and ServiceProvides meaningful life, value certainty and contribution to the common good.
ContinuityСРЧ-19Legacy and continuityIt ensures the transfer of knowledge, culture, experience and results to the next generations.

6.2. Communication with 22 axles

Each SRCh indicator is a concept on the IND axis and must also be linked, at a minimum, to GOA, BEN, GEO, TIM, PRV and RGT. An SRCh standard forms a profile: it defines the mandatory facets, but does not create a second independent metalanguage.

SRCh objectThe key axis of OrionVerification
StandardVAL, NEE, GOA, BEN, DOMThere is a regulatory basis, purpose and recipient
IndicatorIND, GEO, TIM, PRV, RGTis the formula, unit, period, source and rights
Improvement programmeDEC, CAP, PRC, INI, REShave authority, process, project and resource
ResultDEL, REC, PRVhave acceptance criteria, record and independent proof

6.3. Limitations of application

  • No single score can compensate for a critical failure in dignity, safety, rights, or health.
  • Personal data is minimized; identifying and analytical sets are stored separately.
  • A person has the right to know the source, correct the error and demand a human review of the automated solution.
  • Public reporting is aggregated with risk control of re-identification.
  • The model and thresholds are assessed for human rights impacts prior to implementation.

7. Book of Kins: a separate framework of 20×13

Distinguishing the two sets of 260. SRCh contains 260 measurable indicators according to the formula 13×14 + 6×13. The Book of Kins contains 260 symbolic coordinates according to the formula 20 archetypes × 13 tones. Equal counts do not imply identical meanings.

In the Heritage Archive, the KIN describes a combination of a semantic function and a cycle phase for a record, event, or decision. The archetype is not assigned to a person as an immutable characteristic, and the symbolic coordinate is not used as a forecast of fate or a basis for the distribution of rights and resources.

7.1. Twenty Archetypes

№ArchetypeMemory Function
01DragonEast
02WindTransmission
03Nightcapacity
04SeedDesign
05SerpentViability
06Bridge of WorldsCommunication
07Handimplementation
08StarHarmony
09LunaPurification
10DogLoyalty
11MonkeyGame
12PersonSelection
13Sky WandererStudy
14Magicianattention
15EagleVision
16Warriorquestion
17LandSynchronization
18MirrorDifferences
19Stormconversion
20SunIntegrity

7.2. Thirteen tones

№ToneCycle Phase
01MagneticObjective
02LunarCall
03ElectricMinistry
04Self-SubsistingForm
05OverturningAuthority
06RhythmicOrganization
07ResonanceSetup
08GalacticaIntegrity
09SolarIntent
10Planetarymanifestation
11SpectralRelease
12Crystallinecooperation
13Spacepresence

7.3. Encoding and allowable crosswalk

Format: KIN{001–260coordinate stores archetype_id and tone_id. Connection with ORION is allowed as related to TIM, REC or VAL and requires the explicit indication of "symbolic". Conversion to IND prohibited without separate empirical protocol, scientific verification and ethical approval.

Table 2 - Numerical contouring

ContourFormulaPurposeYou can't
ORION 22:2222 axes ↔ 22 resultsUnification of concepts and management verifiabilityinterpret the number as a mystical prediction
SRCh 1.013×14 + 6×13 = 260Measurement of environment, opportunities and outcomesRank the dignity of the person
Book of Kins20×13 = 260Symbolic coordinate of role and phasegive a symbol for a proven indicator
KRISTALL7413×13×19 = 741scale × phase × control systemmix with the axes and indicators of SRCh

8. Governance, security and ethics

8.1. Allocation of responsibility

RoleResponsibility
Metamodel Boardapproves 22 axles, basic rules, profiles and MAJOR releases
Axle ownerslead semantics, mandatory fields, quality and life cycle of concepts
Owners of original schemesMaintain legal and substantive autonomy of classifiers
Crosswalk Commissionvalidates the type, direction, conditions and conformity tests
SRCh Councilmaintains 19 standards, 260 indicators, critical minimums and ethical restrictions
Curator of the symbolic layerseparates cultural interpretation from empirical analysis
Independent auditverifies origin, rights, security, non-discrimination and reproducibility

8.2. Policy decisions about people

  • prohibited hidden social rating, sale of personal profile and behavioral manipulation;
  • automated recommendation should be explained and subject to human review;
  • Sensitive traits are used only for legitimate purposes, minimizing and controlling discrimination.
  • critical decisions require an independent source and a journal basis;
  • A symbolic profile is not grounds for refusal, admission, tariff, sanction or priority.

8.3. Access model

ClassExampleCondition
Openapproved concepts, public schemes, aggregated indicatorsOpen License and Version
Servicerough crosswalk, tests, quality reportsRole, Purpose and Access Log
ConfidentialMicrodata and individual caseslegal basis, minimization, encryption
Limited by HeritageSacred, traditional or sensitive cultural materialsrules of carriers, recall and special terms

9. Technological architecture

9.1. Components

  1. Register of namespaces and permanent identifiers.
  2. Thought Flow Orchestrator: Observation, Hypothesis, Scenario, Proposal, Authority, Action, Verification, and Memory.
  3. Register of concepts and schemes with multilingual labels.
  4. Crosswalk registry and contextual transformation engine.
  5. Object profile compiler: Decision, Project, Dataset, Heritage Object, SRCh.
  6. Catalog of sets and services; subscriptions to changes and manifestos of releases.
  7. Outline of origin and evidence; signatures, hashes, and independent verification.
  8. The scope of rights, consents, licenses and retention periods.
  9. API and event bus for federal bases, GRID and digital twins.
  10. Archive of versions, migrations, decisions and lessons.

9.2. Compatibility with standards

ORION TaskReference StandardRole
MetareisterISO/IEC 11179elements recorded, identification and management
TerminologyISO 704; ISO 860Concepts, definitions, designations and harmonization
SemanticsW3C SKOSschemas of concepts and types of interconnections
CatalogueW3C DCAT 3sets, services, versions and federal search
OriginW3C PROV-OEntity-Activity-Agent and chain of origin
StatisticsSDMX 3.1code lists, data structures, registry and exchange
GeographyUNSD M49reference countries, territories and regions
Activity / ProductsISIC Rev.5 / CPC 3.0external object schemas, not universal code
Human rightsUDHR; OHCHR Indicatorsdignity, rights and method of measurement of performance

10. Road map of implementation

WaveTimeframeResultExit criterion
0. Constitutive0–2 monthsmandate, metamodel board, axes owners, rights policyBoundaries and Roles
1. Semantic Core2–5 months22 axis, URI, concept card, versionabilitypublished CORE 1.0
2. The Crosswalk Pilot4–8 monthsM49 + one sectoral + one national classifiercoverage ≥90%; 100 round-trip tests
3. SRCh profile6–10 months19 standards and 260 indicators in axis IND260 cards undergo methodical and ethical audit
4. The Digital Double9–15 monthsLinking data, scenarios, solutions, projects and effectsA complete outline of the two pilots
5. Federation12–24 monthsAPI, subscriptions, catalog, archive, independent auditat least five autonomous nodes operate according to the general rules

10.1. Recommended Pilots

  • Territorial: human-centred regional development — M49/national geography + SRCh + a portfolio of programmes.
  • Ecological: biocenosis and full-cycle farm - objects, territories, cycles, indicators, resources and proven effect.
  • Heritage: the Book of Kins and the Heritage Archive — symbolic coordinates, the rights of heritage bearers, provenance and versions.
  • Computational: federated databases and GRID are sets profiles, data schemas, access, provenance, and reproducibility.

11. Benchmarks 22:22

The threshold values below are the starting design standards. They are refined after the baseline and pilot validation, but the determinations of results remain stable.

№AxisResultStarting criterion
1VALValue Tracing≥95% goals and solutions are related to the approved principle
2NEERegister of Normalized Needs≥95% of initiatives have a need code; duplicates account for <2%
3GOAPassport Purpose100% goals have a base, target, deadline and indicator
4BENMap of effect recipients≥95% of impacts have a recipient and a scale of influence
5DOMDomain Routing≥98% of records have a primary domain
6OBJCanonical type of object≥99% entities are typed by a valid class
7AGTThe Responsibility Matrix100% managed objects have owner and responsible role
8GEOTerritorial compatibility≥98% spatial objects use canonical code or geometry
9TIMTemporary certainty100% periodicized objects have an interval or a named cycle
10SITConfirmed status snapshot≥95% solutions refer to dated confirmed photo
11INDComparable100% critical indicators have formula, unit, source and periodicity
12SCNA set of comparable alternativesFor each major decision, at least two alternatives are considered
13RSKRisk Map100% major decisions have probability, impact and residual risk assessment
14DECMachine-readable act of decision100% solutions have the authority, basis, deadline and digital confirmation
15CAPMap of abilities100% strategic objectives related to required capabilities
16PRCEnd-to-end process≥95% of critical processes have an owner, inputs, outputs, an SLA and oversight
17INILinked portfolio of initiatives100% initiatives related to the purpose, solution, owner, effect and stages
18RESChecked balance of resources≥98% resource allocations are checked against source and constraints
19DELAccepted delivery100% results have acceptance criteria; critical - independent verification
20RECFull archive package≥99% completed objects complete and archived on time
21PRVChain of Origin100% critical data and statements have verifiable provenance
22RGTRights and Storage Policy100% artifacts have access class, usage rights and shelf life

12. System readiness criteria

  • All 22 axes have an owner, a formal definition and a published version.
  • Each circuit has URI, license, status, owner and machine readable manifest.
  • All crosswalks have type, terms, version, origin and independent verification.
  • SRCh contains exactly 19 standards and 260 indicator cards; the count is checked automatically.
  • SRCh and Kins are separated by namespace, evidentiary status and permitted use cases.
  • For critical decisions, the complete chain is reproduced: data → situation → script → solution → Action → Result → Proof.
  • The user can find out the source of the data, the version of the concept and the cause of the conversion result.
  • No published version is overwritten; migrations and substitutions are documented.
  • Security, human rights, non-discrimination and heritage rules are independently audited.

ORION22:22 becomes not just another classifier, but an operating system for coordinating meanings: it keeps the differences, makes the connections explicit and turns each solution into a verifiable, versionable and inherited record.

Appendix A. Register of 260 Destiny indicators / SRCh 1.0

The names of the 260 indicators from SRCh 1.0 are listed below. Measurement rules, formulas, sources, units, critical minimums and owners are documented in separate IND-axis cards. The name “Destiny” does not imply predetermination: the system observes conditions, opportunities and confirmed changes in a life trajectory.

СРЧ-01. Dignity and rights

Provides protection of the dignity, rights, freedoms and subjectivity of a person.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
101.01Knowledge of your rightsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
201.02Access to legal aidIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
301.03Protection against discriminationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
401.04Freedom of expressionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
501.05Privacy PolicyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
601.06Documented legal personalityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
701.07Access to justiceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
801.08Procedural fairnessIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
901.09Freedom of associationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
1001.10Freedom of conscienceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
1101.11Personal data protectionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
1201.12Participation in decisions about yourselfIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
1301.13Accessibility of environment and servicesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
1401.14Recovery of violated rightsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-02. Physical health

Provides health preservation, prevention, treatment and recovery.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
1502.01Healthy life expectancyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
1602.02Access to primary careIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
1702.03Coverage of preventive examinationsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
1802.04Timeliness of diagnosisIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
1902.05Control of chronic diseasesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
2002.06Physical activityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
2102.07Quality of foodIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
2202.08Quality of sleepIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
2302.09Reproductive healthIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
2402.10Dental healthIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
2502.11Access to medicinesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
2602.12Rehabilitation after injuries and diseasesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
2702.13Self-assessment of physical healthIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
2802.14Preventable mortalityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-03. Psychological well-being

Provides mental stability, support and quality of inner life.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
2903.01Emotional stabilityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
3003.02Satisfaction with lifeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
3103.03Access to psychological assistanceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
3203.04Timely crisis supportIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
3303.05Level of chronic stressIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
3403.06Self-regulation skillsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
3503.07Prevention of addictionsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
3603.08Protection against violence and traumaIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
3703.09Social and emotional skillsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
3803.10A sense of personal effectivenessIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
3903.11Load and recovery balanceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
4003.12Psychological safety of the environmentIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
4103.13Absence of discriminatory stigmaIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
4203.14Recovery from the crisisIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-04. Safety

Provides protection against physical, social, technological and digital threats.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
4304.01Personal physical safetyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
4404.02Home securityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
4504.03Safety of public spacesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
4604.04Occupational safetyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
4704.05Road safetyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
4804.06Fire safetyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
4904.07Preparedness for emergenciesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
5004.08Information securityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
5104.09Protection against fraudIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
5204.10Protection against domestic violenceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
5304.11Child safetyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
5404.12Availability of emergency assistanceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
5504.13Trust in Protection ServicesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
5604.14Recovery after incidentsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-05. Healthy environment

Provides access to environmentally friendly living conditions.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
5705.01Drinking water qualityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
5805.02Air qualityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
5905.03Food safetyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
6005.04Sanitary condition of the territoryIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
6105.05Noise levelIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
6205.06Access to green areasIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
6305.07Soil safetyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
6405.08Waste managementIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
6505.09Climatic comfort of housingIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
6605.10Environmental safety of productionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
6705.11Access to environmental informationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
6805.12Protection from climate risksIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
6905.13Biodiversity of the living environmentIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
7005.14Participation of residents in improving the environmentIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-06. Family and childhood

It ensures the well-being of the family, parenthood and the full development of the child.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
7106.01Material sustainability of the familyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
7206.02Accessibility of preschool developmentIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
7306.03Maternal and child healthIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
7406.04Responsible ParenthoodIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
7506.05Child safetyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
7606.06Quality of family relationsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
7706.07Family time togetherIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
7806.08Support for families in crisisIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
7906.09Accessibility of child careIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
8006.10Inclusion of children with special needsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
8106.11Participation of the child in decisionsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
8206.12Protection from family violenceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
8306.13Preparation for independent lifeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
8406.14Intergenerational linksIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-07. Lifelong learning

Provides continuous development of knowledge, thinking and competencies.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
8507.01Functional literacyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
8607.02Mathematical literacyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
8707.03Natural and scientific literacyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
8807.04Digital literacyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
8907.05Critical ThinkingIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
9007.06Communication skillsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
9107.07Accessibility of educationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
9207.08Individual educational trajectoryIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
9307.09Recognition of non-formal learningIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
9407.10Vocational retrainingIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
9507.11Civic literacyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
9607.12Financial literacyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
9707.13Environmental literacyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
9807.14Ability to learn independentlyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-08. Culture and worldview

Provides cultural identity, ethical maturity and openness to diversity.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
9908.01Knowledge of native cultureIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
10008.02Access to cultural goodsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
10108.03Participation in cultural lifeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
10208.04Intercultural dialogueIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
10308.05Ethical literacyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
10408.06Freedom of worldviewIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
10508.07Media literacyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
10608.08Historical literacyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
10708.09Preservation of mother tongueIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
10808.10Creative self-expressionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
10908.11Respect for cultural diversityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
11008.12Culture of communicationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
11108.13Critical Understanding of InformationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
11208.14Link between culture and everyday lifeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-09. Work and professional fulfilment

Provides decent work, skill and professional self-realization.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
11309.01Access to decent workIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
11409.02Workplace safetyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
11509.03Fair payIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
11609.04Stability of employmentIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
11709.05Conformity of work qualificationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
11809.06Professional developmentIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
11909.07Autonomy at workIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
12009.08Work-life balanceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
12109.09Protection of labour rightsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
12209.10Employee participation in managementIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
12309.11Recognition of professional contributionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
12409.12Entrepreneurial initiativeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
12509.13Labour productivityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
12609.14Public utility of workIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-10. Economic independence

Provides sustainable income, financial literacy and resource management.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
12710.01Sufficiency of disposable incomeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
12810.02Income stabilityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
12910.03Availability of financial reserveIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
13010.04Debt managementIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
13110.05Access to basic financial servicesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
13210.06Protection against financial fraudIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
13310.07Personal budgeting skillsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
13410.08Long-term savingsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
13510.09Access to development investmentIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
13610.10Insurance securityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
13710.11Economic sustainability of householdsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
13810.12Diversification of income sourcesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
13910.13Possession of productive assetsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
14010.14Ability to overcome financial shockIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-11. Housing and living space

Provides an affordable, safe and developing living space.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
14111.01Housing affordabilityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
14211.02Legal protection of residenceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
14311.03Physical security of housingIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
14411.04Provision of public servicesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
14511.05Energy efficiency of housingIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
14611.06Accessibility of transportIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
14711.07Barrier-free spaceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
14811.08Sufficient personal spaceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
14911.09Access to social infrastructureIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
15011.10Quality of the yard environmentIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
15111.11Coherence of territoryIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
15211.12Sustainability of housing costsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
15311.13Possibility of improving housing conditionsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
15411.14Participation of residents in the management of the houseIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-12. Digital agency

Provides the rights, security, access and independence of the Human in the digital environment.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
15512.01Internet accessIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
15612.02Accessibility of digital devicesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
15712.03Basic digital literacyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
15812.04Digital Identity ManagementIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
15912.05Control of personal dataIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
16012.06KibergigienIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
16112.07Protection from Digital ViolenceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
16212.08Understanding algorithmic solutionsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
16312.09Skills of working with artificial intelligenceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
16412.10Accessibility of digital public servicesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
16512.11Digital InclusionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
16612.12Right to human considerationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
16712.13Screen Time ManagementIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
16812.14Creation of digital contentIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-13. Creativity and innovation

Provides the ability to create, research and implement socially useful solutions.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
16913.01Creative activityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
17013.02Research skillsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
17113.03Access to laboratories and workshopsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
17213.04Access to funding initiativesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
17313.05Protection of intellectual rightsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
17413.06Team-building solutionsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
17513.07Experimentation and prototypingIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
17613.08Implementation of resultsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
17713.09The Social Utility of InnovationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
17813.10Environmentally friendly innovationsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
17913.11Entrepreneurial implementation of ideasIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
18013.12Open knowledge exchangeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
18113.13Recognition of author's contributionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
18213.14Scaling successful solutionsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-14. Social connections and solidarity

Provides affiliation, trust, mutual assistance and participation in communities.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
18314.01Presence of close linksIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
18414.02Trust in the immediate surroundingsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
18514.03Mutual assistanceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
18614.04Involvement in communitiesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
18714.05Protection from social exclusionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
18814.06Quality of communicationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
18914.07Voluntary activityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
19014.08Intergenerational interactionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
19114.09Neighbourhood cooperationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
19214.10Inclusion of vulnerable groupsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
19314.11Conflict ResolutionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
19414.12Social trustIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
19514.13Access to public spacesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-15. Civic participation

Provides informed participation in public life and decision-making.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
19615.01Knowledge of civil rights and dutiesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
19715.02Participation in elections and votingIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
19815.03Participation in public discussionsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
19915.04Access to public informationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
20015.05Citizens' appeals and initiativesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
20115.06Public controlIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
20215.07Participation in local self-governmentIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
20315.08Membership in public associationsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
20415.09Experience of joint problem solvingIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
20515.10Trust in participation proceduresIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
20615.11Getting feedback from authoritiesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
20715.12Competence of public dialogueIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
20815.13Impact of participation on decisionsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-16. Environmental responsibility

Ensures responsible environmental management and ecosystem restoration.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
20916.01Separate waste collectionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
21016.02Reducing waste generationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
21116.03Energy-efficient behaviourIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
21216.04Water savingIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
21316.05Responsible consumptionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
21416.06Use of environmentally friendly transportIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
21516.07Participation in the restoration of natureIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
21616.08Conservation of biodiversityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
21716.09Ecological nutritionIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
21816.10Keeping a Personal Environmental FootprintIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
21916.11Support for environmental initiativesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
22016.12Observance of environmental standardsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
22116.13Transfer of environmental practicesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-17. Time and life trajectory management

Provides a balance of roles, time, goals and transitions between life stages.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
22217.01Awareness of life goalsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
22317.02Time planningIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
22417.03Balance of work and restIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
22517.04Balancing family and community rolesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
22617.05Time for healthIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
22717.06Time for trainingIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
22817.07Time for creativityIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
22917.08Quality of restIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
23017.09Overload managementIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
23117.10Preparedness for life transitionsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
23217.11Updating the individual trajectoryIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
23317.12Achieving personal goalsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
23417.13Subjective control of timeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-18. Meaning and service

Provides meaningful life, value certainty and contribution to the common good.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
23518.01Meaningfulness of lifeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
23618.02Value CertaintyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
23718.03Conformity of actions with valuesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
23818.04A sense of purposeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
23918.05Contribution to the well-being of othersIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
24018.06Regularity of socially useful activitiesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
24118.07Responsibility for the consequences of decisionsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
24218.08Ability to make moral choicesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
24318.09Appreciation and recognition of the contributions of othersIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
24418.10Reconciliation of the personal and common goodIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
24518.11Sustainability of meaning in crisisIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
24618.12Mentoring and Service ExperienceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
24718.13Public impact assessmentIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

СРЧ-19. Heritage and continuity

It ensures the transfer of knowledge, culture, experience and results to the next generations.

№CodeIndicatorMandatory connectivity
24819.01Fixation of life experienceIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
24919.02Transfer of professional knowledgeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
25019.03Mentoring the Next GenerationIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
25119.04Preservation of family historyIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
25219.05Transfer of cultural traditionsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
25319.06Continuity of public initiativesIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
25419.07Durability of created resultsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
25519.08Open Access to KnowledgeIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
25619.09Training of successorsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
25719.10Responsible Heritage ManagementIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
25819.11Intergenerational projectsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
25919.12Evaluation of long-term effectsIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT
26019.13Contribution to the future of the TerritoryIND + GOA/BEN/GEO/TIM/PRV/RGT

Annex B. Sources and regulatory framework

ORION architecture is a project synthesis. International standards are used as reference models for compatibility; references do not imply certification or formal approval of the project by the relevant organizations.

1. ISO/IEC 11179-1:2023. The basis of the meta-register and the separation of data and their descriptions. Official source

2. ISO/IEC 11179-3:2023. Conceptual model of recorded elements and displays. Official source

3. ISO 704:2022. Separation of object, concepts, definitions and designations. Official source

4. ISO 860:2007. Method of harmonization of concepts, systems of concepts, definitions and terms. Official source

5. W3C SKOS. A model of schemas of concepts and typed interscheme correspondences. Official source

6. W3C DCAT 3. Federal catalog of sets, services and versions. Official source

7. W3C PROV-O. Machine-readable origin of Entity Activity Agent. Official source

8. UNSD M49. The reference geographical axis for countries, territories and regions. Official source

9. UNSD ISIC Rev. 5. Reference scheme for the classification of activities. Official source

10. UNSD CPC Ver. 3.0. Reference scheme for goods and services. Official source

11. SDMX 3.1. Information model, registry and exchange of statistical data and metadata. Official source

12. FAIR Guiding Principles. Availability, accessibility, compatibility and reuse of digital objects. Official source

13. European Interoperability Framework. Legal, organizational, semantic and technical compatibility levels. Official source

14. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Normative basis of dignity, equality, freedoms and legal personality. Official source

15. OHCHR Human Rights Indicators. Measurement of human rights standards. Official source

Internal project sources

  • Human Development Standard SRCh 1.0. 19 standards, 260 indicators. Edition 1.0 dated 18 August 2026.
  • Book of Kins. Archive for Preserving Humanity’s Heritage. A model of 20 archetypes × 13 tones.
  • Ledger. Archetypes and Cycles.
  • ORION22:22. Strategic concept and presentation, previous edition.

Other published edition: ORION22:22 ORION_22-22_Strategic_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

Civilizational Operating System for Compatible Solutions

Unification of the classifier · 19 Human Standards · 260 indicators · "Thinking Flow"

Meaning

Knowledge

Decision

Action

Memory

30 August 2026 · version 2.0

Compatibility, not centralization

ORION22:22 / 02

ORION does not replace existing classifiers - it retains their autonomy and connects meanings.

Sovereign schemes

Application contours

Metareister ORION

M49 · geography

ISIC · activities

CPC · products

SDMX · statistics

SRCh · human development

Industry and national codes

Solutions and programs

Digital twins

Federal bases and GRID

New financial system

Biocenoses and farms

Heritage archive

22 sense axes

Permanent identifiers

Versions and origin

Crosswalk with type of communication

Rights and terms of storage

Principle: A single metalanguage is not a single coerced code.

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

The main risk is semantic loss

ORION22:22 / 03

The error does not occur in the code, but in the transfer of meaning between systems, contexts and versions.

Code moved

The concept simplified

Context is lost

The indicator drifts

The decision is distorted

The meaning seems to coincide

Conditions of applicability disappear

Time, place and recipient not taken into account

The comparison becomes false

Responsibility is blurred

Definition

context

Version

provenance

Law

round-trip test

ORION Protection

Each match has a direction, type, conditions, proof and reverse conversion test.

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

Architecture 22:22

ORION22:22 / 04

A double point means structural conformity: 22 Sense Axis ↔ 22 Verified Results

SEMANTICS

01–05

Value → target

Core and Identity

6–10

06–10

Object → situation

Crosswalk and quality

11–13

11–15

Indicator → Risk

Evidence and SRCh

14–18

16–18

Solution → resource

Double and Flow

RESULTS

19–22

19–22

Result → rights

API, federation, archive, audit

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

Five layers of civilizational OS

ORION22:22 / 05

Each layer takes a verifiable input and leaves a machine-readable trace

MEANING

What's that supposed to mean?

· Definitions · Values

KNOWLEDGE

What's confirmed?

Data · sources · versions

DECISION

Who and on what basis?

Scripts · Risk ·

ACTION

What's done?

process · resource · result

MEMORY

What is preserved and assimilated?

provenance · archive · lesson

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

“Thinking stream” — controlled trajectory

ORION22:22 / 06

AI expands the field of hypotheses; a person retains the authority and responsibility for a critical decision

1 Signal

2 Context

3 Hypothesis

surveillance

GEO·TIM·SIT axes

alternatives

6 Authority

5 Offer

4 Script

person / college

options and risks

effects and price

7 Action

8 Verification

9 Memory

execution

Fact against purpose

version and lesson

AI: hypotheses · alternatives · warnings

Person: Target · Authority · Critical Decision

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

22 sense axes

ORION22:22 / 07

Minimum profile that makes an object comparable, verifiable and manageable

Intention

CONTACTS

PROOF

EXECUTION

RESPONSIBILITY

01 VAL

02 NEE need

03 GOA target

04 BEN

05 DOM domain

06 OBJ

07 AGT agent

08 GEO space

09 TIM time

10 SIT situation

11 IND indicator

12 SCN script

13 RSK risk

14 DEC Solution

15 CAP ability

16 PRC process

17 INI initiative

18 RES resource

19 DEL result

20 REC record

21 PRV origin

22 RGT rights

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

22 Verified Results

ORION22:22 / 08

Architecture is considered to work only when each result has an owner and a acceptance criterion.

NUCLEAR

COMPARISON

PERSONS AND DATA

DECISION

01 CORE metamodel

02 Profile of 22 axes

03 Namespace

04 Card concepts

05 Release Policy

06 Dictionary of Relations

07 Register crosswalk

08 Coverage metric

09 Round-trip tests

10 Multilingual tags

11 Provenance Chain

12 Rights Model

13 Data Catalog

14 SRCh profile

15 260 cards

16 Double Profile

17 Stream Orchestrator

18 Decision log

19 Public API

20 Federated nodes

21 Heritage Archive

22 Audit Panel

Readiness = artefact + owner + test + version + evidence

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

Card of the concept - the atom of compatibility

ORION22:22 / 09

The concept has identity, definition, context, version, origin and rights.

The machine checks

OR22 / IND / SRCH / 05.014 @ 1.0

Uniqueness URI

mandatory fields

Version Compatibility

integrity provenance

Accessibility

URI

https://id.orion2222.org/c/IND/SRCH/05.014

OSI

IND · indicator

Schema

SRCH · Human Development Standard

DEFINITION

Normatively approved meaning without labeling

The man claims

CONTACTS

GEO · TIM · BEN · SIT

Definition and boundaries

Owner of Meaning

Application conditions

Ethical restrictions

critical decision

VERSION / PRV

release 1.0 · source · author · date · hash

RIGHTS

access class · license · storage life

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

Crosswalk: communication with type, direction and conditions

ORION22:22 / 10

Conformity is a self-managed object, not a string in a single table

TYPE OF COMMUNICATION

Source

Goal

exact

close

broader / narrower

related

composite

noMatch

scheme_A / concept_X

version · definition

context · owner

scheme_B / concept_Y

version · definition

context · owner

direction

Terms and Conditions

Proof

Tests

Commission Decision

Forbidden: silently coerce - silently turn "close" into "equal".

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

19 Human Standards

ORION22:22 / 11

The environment is standardized, not the individual. Standards describe the conditions of a decent life and development

BASIC · 01–05

BUILDING · 06–08

INDEPENDENCE · 09–12

CREATION · 13–16

CONTINUITY · 17–19

01 Dignity and rights

02 Physical health

03 Psychological well-being

04 Security

05 Healthy environment

06 Family and childhood

07 Lifelong learning

08 Culture and worldview

09 Work and professional implementation

10 Economic independence

11 Housing and living space

12 Digital subjectivity

13 Creativity and Innovation

14 Social relations and solidarity

15 Civic participation

16 Environmental responsibility

17 Time and life trajectory management

18 Meaning and ministry

19 Legacy and succession

Not a rating of fate. Not a personality prediction. No reason to deny the right.

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

260

ORION22:22 / 12

260 indicators: the complete SRCh counting system

Each indicator is a verifiable card, not an arbitrary score of a person

13 × 14

6 × 13

13 Standards

6 Standards

Total

by 14 indicators

= 182 cards

by 13 indicators

= 78 cards

182 + 78

= 260 cards

Definition

unit

Source

period

Method

threshold

Law

Card structure

260 = covering the conditions of development; not personality typology and not predicting the future.

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

SRCh becomes an operational profile

ORION22:22 / 13

The indicator is associated with the context, decision, action and proof of effect

Standard

Indicator

Context

Decision

Action

Effect

05 · Healthy environment

SRCH / 05.xxx

GEO · TIM · BEN · SIT

DEC · CAP · RSK

PRC · INI · RES

DEL · REC · PRV

One indicator without context does not govern. Context without provenance does not prove. Evidence without authority does not authorize action.

aggregation

Disaggregation

Methodical audit

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

The same numbers, different systems

ORION22:22 / 14

Numerical coincidence does not mean semantic identity: the layers are divorced architecturally and ethically

22:22

ORION

22 axes ↔ 22 results

operating structure

260

SRCh

13×14 + 6×13

Empirical Indicators of Conditions

260

Book of Kins

20×13

Symbolic coordinates

741

CRYSTALL

3×13×19

Compatibility Codes

Symbolic layer: Cultural interpretation is never a rating, a prediction of rights, or the basis of a sanction.

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

Human rights embedded in architecture

ORION22:22 / 15

Ethics is implemented as rules of data, access and authority - not as a declaration in the application

REQUIRED

PROHIBITED

Purpose and legal basis

Minimization of data

Explainability of the recommendation

The human revision

Control of discrimination

Solution Log and Provenance

? Withdrawal, correction and retention period

× hidden social rating

× Personal profile sale

× Behavioral manipulation

× sanction on symbolic profile

× critical solution without human

× unlimited storage

× tacit change of definition

The environment is standardized, not the individual.

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

Ecosystem roles and technological core

ORION22:22 / 16

Organizations remain independent, but work according to the general rules of identity, evidence and rights.

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

ECO-PPA

observation · forecast · double

people · initiatives · development

resources · agreements · effect

TECHNOLOGICAL NUCLEAR ORION

register · crosswalk · catalogue · provenance · rights · API · event bus · GRID

SPECZASHCHITA

KRISTALL741

HERITAGE ARCHIVE

Execution · service · protection

codes · compatibility

Right · Version · Lessons

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

Roadmap: From Mandate to Federation

ORION22:22 / 17

Six overlapping waves, each ending in a measurable exit criterion

0–2 months

2–5 months

4–8 months

Institution

Semantic Core

The Crosswalk Pilot

Mandate · Roles · Rights

22 axes · URI · CORE 1.0

M49 + sectoral + national

6–10 months

9–15 months

12–24 months

SRCh profile

Digital twin

Federation

19 standards · 260 cards

solution → action → effect

≥5 Autonomous Units

Pilots: territory · biocenosis / full cycle farm · heritage archive · computing GRID

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

Solution: authorize pilot ORION22:22

ORION22:22 / 18

The first stage creates not another base, but the rules of joint work of existing systems.

APPROVAL

FIRST 30 DAYS

Pilot's mandate and limits

01 pilot profile

02 participants and roles register

03 Version 0.1 of the metamodel

04 Selection of three initial diagrams

05 20 test crosswalks

06 Protocol of rights and audit

The Metamodel and Axis Owners Council

an ethical policy for SRCh and the symbolic layer

resources for CORE 1.0 and crosswalk pilot

ORION: meaning becomes compatible, solution becomes provable, action becomes verifiable, memory becomes inherited.

Civilized operating systems · version 2.0

Sources cited in presentation 26

  • Author's design definition ORION22:22
  • https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/iopeu-monitoring/european-interoperability-framework-detail
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/78914.html
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/78915.html
  • Author's model ORION22:22
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
  • https://www.ohchr.org/en/publications/policy-and-methodological-publications/human-rights-indicators-guide-measurement-and
  • Author's project definition of "Thinking Flow"
  • Author's model 22 axes ORION
  • https://sdmx.org/standards-2/
  • Author's results matrix ORION22:22
  • Author's scheme of ID ORION
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/79077.html
  • https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
  • The author’s SRCh 1.0 structure
  • The author’s counting model SRCh 1.0
  • The author’s SRCh profile for ORION
  • The author’s project models: ORION, SRCh, Book of Kins and KRISTALL
  • Author's distribution of ORION roles
  • https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/
  • https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic
  • https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/cpc
  • Author's roadmap ORION
  • Author's design solution ORION22:22

Published files

Strategy · Full published text

Russia: A New Order

Source Status: Primary Document

A strategic model for moving towards interconnected management of technological, industrial, infrastructure, personnel, financial, territorial and biotic-community balances.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/rossiya-novyi-uklad

Open on the site

Strategic package version: document + presentation + visual image

1. Executive summary

The New Order is not a change of slogan, but a transition to a system in which goals, balances, projects, resources, production, oversight and feedback work as a unified framework for the country’s development.

The basic idea: Russia should manage not individual programs, but a related system of balances: technological, industrial, infrastructure, personnel, financial, territorial and biocenose.

The main result is the transformation of disparate assets, institutions, state corporations, scientific schools and territories into a coherent system of national design.

SupportContents
National targets 2030/2036Preservation of population, realization of human potential, comfortable environment, environmental well-being, sustainable economy, technological leadership, digital transformation.
Science and technologyTransition from purchasing ready-made solutions to creating your own critical technologies, scientific groundwork, materials and engineering schools.
Industrial OutlineSynchronization of the manufacturing industry, engineering, instrumentation, materials science, energy and infrastructure.
EQUILIBRIUM / MetabalanceA superstructure linking data, forecasts, cross-industry balances, government registries and execution contours.

2. Formula of the New Order

New Order = sovereign planning + science + industry + energy + the individual + a digital framework + biotic communities + cooperation

3. The Eight Paths of Transition

ContourTaskResult
1. Sovereign planningTransition from departmental planning to a single state contour of goals, balances and design.Measurable contribution to the country's metabalance
2. Science and technologyFocus on critical technology, engineering schools, test sites, validation and rapid implementation.Measurable contribution to the country's metabalance
3. Industry and new materialsAssembling industries around materials science, synthetic crystals, ceramics, microelectronics, machinery and equipment.Measurable contribution to the country's metabalance
4. Energy and infrastructureCommunication of power systems, transport, utilities, construction, logistics and distributed generation into a single sustainability map.Measurable contribution to the country's metabalance
5. People, education and personnelTraining for real production chains: engineer, technologist, designer, data operator, project manager.Measurable contribution to the country's metabalance
6. Digital circuit and AIFederated databases, computational GRID, digital twins, modeling, forecasting and performance control.Measurable contribution to the country's metabalance
7. Ecology and biocenosesBalancing air, water, soil, biota, human health and man-made load as part of economic planning.Measurable contribution to the country's metabalance
8. Interregional cooperationCross-linking of regions through production tasks, logistics, labor markets, research centers, foundations and cooperation agreements.Measurable contribution to the country's metabalance

4. System architecture

Target layer

national goals, security, quality of life, sovereignty, technological leadership

Balance layer

cross-industry, territorial, personnel, energy, financial and biocenosis balance sheets

Design layer

project portfolios, roadmaps, standards, project assignments, digital twins

Executive layer

state corporations, ministries, regions, development institutions, foundations, scientific and production consortia

Control layer

KPI, effects audit, feedback, plan adjustment, public monitoring panels

5. Exits to the New Order

WithdrawalContents
The New Industrializationfull cycle production chains, machines, devices, materials, robotization
Materialistic breakthroughceramics, synthetic crystals, composites, rare earth chains, laboratories and landfills
Computational Gridsovereign computing, distributed data centers, engineering modeling, AI-control circuit
Funds systemproject trust funds, regional funds, personal and branch funds, returnable capital model
Biocenosis balancelinking the economy to water, soil, air, forests, health and food security
Territorial Metabalanceeach region gets a role in the overall production and scientific architecture of the country
Export of the waysupply of not only resources, but standards, technologies, infrastructure solutions and educational programs

6. Road map 2026–2030

YearDecision
2026Collection of metabalance: state corporations, industries, regions, critical technologies, personnel, funds.
2027Launch of pilot contours: new materials, energy, digital GRID, biocenous monitoring points.
2028Scaling cooperation: interregional chains, design standards, federal control panels.
2029Institutionalization: permanent funds, unified registers, effects validation center, export showcase.
2030Transition to the continuous construction of the country: forecast, balance, project, production, audit.

7. KPI and control

  • share of projects with a digital double and a balance passport
  • Number of interregional production chains
  • reduction of critical import dependence on materials and equipment
  • Productivity gains in pilot industries
  • Number of trained engineers, technologists and data operators
  • number of biocenose monitoring points and restored territories
  • Full-cycle fund funding

8. Sources and normative support

  1. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 07.05.2024 No. 309 "On national development goals of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030 and for the future up to 2036".
  2. The decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 28.02.2024 No145 "On the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation".
  3. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 06.06.2020 from 1512-r, Consolidated strategy for the development of the manufacturing industry of the Russian Federation up to 2030 and for the period up to 2035, with changes 2024–2026 years.

Other published editorial board: Russia_New_Conclusion Russia_New_Conclusion.pptx · web text +

The New Order is a mode of continuously shaping the country

1. Meaning of New Order

From Programs to Development

Not a set of projects

Not just the economy

Not Import Model

A unified system of goals, balances, resources, design, execution and feedback.

The contour includes human, education, health, territory, biocenoses and safety.

Own development architecture based on sovereign data, technologies and institutions.

  • The goal: to link state corporations, ministries, regions, science, funds and projects into one metabalance.
  • Tool: digital circuit EQUILIBRIUM / GRID / registers / control panels.
  • The result: the transition from departmental fragmentation to a managed national designer.

The New Order builds on existing state planning horizons

2. Normative support

2030–2036

National targets 2030/2036

Strategy NTR 2024

Industry 2030/2035

Human, environment, ecology, economy, technological leadership and digital transformation.

Critical technologies, big challenges, science as the basis of a sustainable future and sovereignty.

Manufacturing industry, engineering, industry priorities, technological independence.

The task of the package is to collect these horizons into a single execution architecture, where each project has a balance passport, a resource card, a responsible performer and a measurable effect.

3. The Eight Paths of Transition

System Map

Sovereign

Planning

Science and

Technology

Industry and

new materials

Energy and

infrastructure

Man,

education, personnel

Digital

contour and AI

Ecology and

Biocenoses

Interregional

Co-operation

Principle: each outline does not exist separately - it receives a task, data, resources, performer and place in the general metabalance of Russia.

4. Metabalance architecture

Objective → Balance → Project → Execution → Control

Objectives

Balances

Designing

Implementation

Monitoring

national goals, safety, quality of life

resources, personnel, energy, territory, finance

projects, standards, digital twins

state corporations, regions, funds, consortia

KPI, audit, feedback, adjustment

EQUILIBRIUM / Computational GRID / Federal databases / requirements registers / monitoring panels

  • Metabalance is not a substitute for controls; it links them into a single picture of decisions.
  • The key effect is to see the consequences of the decision before starting the project and adjust the course according to the data.

5. Exits to the New Order

practical directions

The New Industrialization

Materialistic breakthrough

Full cycle production chains

ceramics, synthetic crystals, composites

Computational Grid

Funds system

sovereign computing, AI, modeling

trust funds of projects and territories

Biocenosis balance

Export of the way

water, soil, air, health, food safety

standards, technologies, infrastructure, education

6. Road map 2026–2030

assembly and scaling

2026

Metabalance collection: state corporations, industries, regions, technologies, personnel, funds.

2027

Pilots: new materials, energy, digital GRID, biocenose monitoring points.

2028

Scaling: interregional chains, design standards, control panels.

2029

Institutionalization: funds, registers, effects validation center, export showcase.

2030

Continuous design mode: forecast, balance, project, production, audit.

7. New Order KPI

Measurability of management

  • Share of projects with balance passport and digital twin
  • Number of interregional production chains
  • Reduction of critical import dependence on materials and equipment
  • Productivity gains in pilot industries
  • Trained engineers, technologists, data operators
  • Biocenose monitoring points and restored territories
  • Full-cycle project fund funding

KPI: the ability of the state to see, design and adjust development as a single system, and not as the sum of departmental reports.

Russia enters the New Order when every resource gains meaning, every project a balance, every region a role and every person a path of development.

8. Final formula

New Country Assembly System

Decision

Create a single planning and design circuit: metabalance + GRID + funds + pilot territories + effects control.

Final Logic: Goals → Data → Balance Sheets → projects → resources → Production → monitoring → adjustment → development.

Published files

State · Full published text

Russia: A System of Planning and Design

Source Status: Primary Document

An integrated system for turning strategic goals into balances, projects, resources, production, construction and management feedback.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/rossiya-sistema-planirovaniya-i-konstruirovaniya

Open on the site

Working concept package • version 1.0

1. Purpose of system

The planning and design system of Russia is a single contour of the translation of strategic goals into verifiable projects, resources, production chains, construction solutions and management feedback.

Key principle: the country is governed by linked balances and project models. Each national idea should have an image of the result, a resource model, responsible executors, benchmarks and an adjustment mechanism.

The system combines state strategic planning, cross-industry balance sheets, digital twins of territories and industries, personnel contours, industrial execution, construction complex and control of achievement of results.

2. Logic of the full cycle

A full cycle is built as a closed loop: strategic goals → balances and data → Design → resources and personnel → production and construction → control and feedback → Clarification of objectives.

Such a cycle allows you to move from disparate programs to a single national designer: each initiative gets a place in the system, is associated with territories, industries, funds, standards, personnel and terms.

The result is not just a planning document, but a managed implementation architecture where you can see deficits, bottlenecks, effects and risks before large-scale spending begins.

3. Six basic modules

ModuleContentsKey productManagement issue
1. Strategic objectivesNational priorities, scenarios, development goals and outcome indicators.Map of goals and success criteria.What should be built and why?
2. Balances and dataDemographics, resources, capacity, finance, technology, territories and risks.A shared database of balances and deficits.What restrictions and reserves exist?
3. DesignDesign models, digital twins, technical specifications and regulatory solutions.Package of project solutions.How exactly should this be designed?
4. Resources and staffingFunds, budgets, cooperation, skills and educational pathways.Resource and personnel matrix.Who and by what does he perform?
5. Production and constructionIndustrial cooperation, the construction sector, logistics and import substitution.An implementation plan and supply chains.How can this be brought to a physical result?
6. Control and feedbackMonitoring, audit, validation, adjustment and lessons from implementation.Control panel and adjustment package.What works, what needs to be changed?

4. Management architecture

  • Federal level: strategic goals, cross-cutting standards, national balances, priority projects and benchmarks.
  • Industry level: production chains, technological maps, personnel needs, quality standards and modernization plan.
  • Regional level: territorial models, infrastructure nodes, land and urban planning solutions, social effects.
  • Project level: project passport, digital twin, budget, risks, calendar plan, procurement outline, performance control.
  • Civil and expert level: public validation, scientific expertise, feedback, open result indicators.

5. Relationship with EQUILIBRIUM, SFERA, ECO-PPA and SPECZASHCHITA

ContourRole in the systemPractical output
EQUILIBRIUMIntelligent OS: observation, meanings, balances, scenarios, coherence of solutions.A unified picture of the country and modeling the consequences.
SFERAThe space of initiatives and communications: collecting projects, participants and meanings.Entrance for civil, scientific, entrepreneurial and regional initiatives.
ECO-PPAMechanism for resource mobilization and threat prevention.Pilot packages, resource agreements, environmental and infrastructure contours.
SPECZASHCHITACooperative organization of project execution and protection.Consortiums, pilots, industrial cooperation, risk control.

6. Pilot launch

  • Choose 3–5 territories and 3–5 industry areas: construction, energy, transport, ecology, materials, digital registers.
  • Collect basic balances: needs, capacities, resources, personnel, land, infrastructure, finance, regulatory restrictions.
  • Create pilot passports: purpose, effect, digital twin, performers, calendar, budget, risks, control indicators.
  • Start a monthly feedback cycle: plan - fact - deviations - reasons - adjustment - a new version of the plan.
  • Prepare scaling to the federal outline after testing the model on pilots.

7. Road map for 12 months

StageTimeframeActionsResult
I. Kernel Assembly1–2 monthWorking group, methodology, data list, passport template of the project.The pilot's uniform.
II. Balances3–4 monthData collection, maps of deficits, a register of resources and performers.The first version of balance.
III. Design5–7 monthDigital models, technical tasks, calendar plans, risk maps.Package of project solutions.
IV. Implementation8–10 monthLaunch of pilot works, cooperation, supply and personnel control.First physical and managerial results.
V. Scaling11–12 monthEvaluation of effectiveness, adjustment of methods, federal proposal.Implementation package for the next cycle.

8. Final formula

Strategy + Balances + Design + Resources + Implementation + Feedback = Managed development of the country

The planning and design system should become a working development machine: not to replace existing institutions, but to link them to a test cycle, where each project takes place in the general architecture of Russia.

Other published edition: RUSSIA Russia_System_planning_and_design.pptx · web text +

Planning and design system

Unified outline of strategic goals, balances, design, resources, execution and feedback

Working concept package

1. Why we need a system

Transition from disparate programs to a manageable result architecture

Issue addressed

Decision

Strategies, budgets, industry plans, construction and control often live in different contours. As a result, goals do not always turn into verifiable results.

Single cycle: target → Balance → Project → resources → execution → control. Each project is related to data, personnel, finances, territory and terms.

Package Purpose

Assemble a working model of the state development designer: with a map of goals, national balances, project outline, resource and personnel matrix and feedback system.

2. Full cycle of management

A closed loop turns strategy into a physical and social result

Strategic

Objectives

Balances

and data

Design

Resources

and personnel

Monitoring

and feedback

Production

and construction

Each turn of the cycle refines the plan, reduces uncertainty and increases manageability.

3. Balance as the basis of design

Without balance, the plan becomes a declaration.

Demography

Resources

Power

people, families, migration, health, employment

land, water, energy, raw materials, infrastructure

industry, construction, logistics, IT

Finance

Workforce

Risks

budgets, funds, investments, PPA mechanisms

competence, education, project teams

Deficiencies, Threats, and Regulatory Restrictions

Output: a single map of deficits, reserves, restrictions and effects across the country, industries and territories.

4. Architecture of levels

The system should connect the state, industries, regions and projects

Federal Contour

goals, standards, national balances, priorities

Industry Outline

production chains, technologies, standards, personnel

Regional Outline

territories, infrastructure nodes, land, social effect

Project domain

passport, digital twin, budget, risks, calendar

Expert outline

validation, audit, feedback, adjustment

The main effect: not the vertical of the orders, but the associated implementation machine.

5. Integration of contours

EQUILIBRIUM - SFERA - ECO - PPA - SPECZASHCHITA: functional roles

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

Intelligent OS: meanings, balances, scenarios, connectivity

space of initiatives, projects, participants and communications

Resource mobilization, environmental and infrastructure packages

cooperative execution, consortia, pilots, risk control

Their task is not to compete with institutions, but to link them into a single cycle of result.

6. Pilot launch

You need to start with a limited set of territories and industries

Selection of 3–5 territories and industry directions

Priorities of the pilot

Collection of basic balances and resource register

Construction

Energy

Transport

Ecology

materials

Digital Registers

Pilot passports and digital models

Run execution and monthly feedback

Scaling after model verification

7. Final formula

The system should become a working development machine

Strategy + Balances + Design + Resources + Implementation + Feedback

= Managed development of the country

The next step is to pack the system into a state master document: a regulation, a project passport template, a balance model, a pilot roadmap and a list of responsible contours.

Published files

Management · Full published text

Balances as a Management System

Source Status: Primary Document

Explaining how a system of interconnected balances can be used to plan and control.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/balansy-kak-sistema-upravleniya

Open on the site

19 SYSTEMS × 13 FAZ × 3 MASSTABA = 741 MODULES

From static tables and disparate indicators to interrelated contours of observation, diagnosis, decision, resource, execution and proven result

Integration: SUR • KRISTALL741 • catalogue 260 • EQUILIBRIUM • SUR-810 • ESG-IR 1.0

Author: Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov

Version 1.0 | 28 August 2026

STATUS

Passport Concept

ParameterValue
SubjectArchitecture of 19 interconnected balance management systems
GoalLink national goals, actual status, decisions, resources and proven results
Operating CoreKRISTALL741: 19 systems × 13 phases × 3 scales
StandardizationCatalog 260: indicators, formulas, sources, thresholds and validation rules
TraceabilitySUR-810: settlement and document trail without creating a parallel currency
ResultEQUILIBRIUM and ESG-IR 1.0 confirm state change and exposure

MAIN

Summary for decision

Public administration often shares goals, indicators, budgets, industries, territories, and reporting. The balance approach combines them into a single contour: the observed state is compared with the target corridor, the reasons for the deviation are checked by the model, the solution receives legal authority and resource, and the execution is completed by independent validation of the result.

It is proposed to use 19 balances not as new departments, but as cross-cutting coordination systems. Each system has an object, stocks and flows, regulatory constraints, the owner of the result, impact tools, associated balances, and an evidence cycle.

DECISION

Proposed management solution

  1. Approve the definition of balance as a management system, and not a static department table.
  2. Secure the list B01-B19 as a project classifier of end-to-end control circuits.
  3. Apply a single cycle L01–L13 and three scale S1–S3 for addressing decisions.
  4. For each module, approve the passport: object, purpose, indicators, data, formulas, law, resources, risks, dependencies and validation.
  5. Link documents, budget and project commitments to balance, phase, scale and outcome.
  6. Prohibit automatic approval unless legal, resource, safety or evidence gateways are passed.
  7. According to the results of the pilot to make a decision: stop, improve or scale.

DEFINITION

Balance as a system

Balance is the management system. Each balance is a living contour of a particular area of development: observes stocks, flows, structure and constraints; compares them with the target corridor; explains the reasons for the deviation; models the consequences; forms permissible impacts; connects the decision with the resource and responsibility; checks the actual effect on feedback. The set of interrelated balances forms the management of the country as a system of systems.

ElementContentsThe control question
ObjectPopulation, territory, resource, industry, infrastructure or institutionWhat exactly are we changing?
StateStocks, flows, structure, quality and constraintsWhere are we?
Target corridorMinimum, target value, maximum risk and durationWhere are we going?
ObservationSources, events, periodicity and quality of dataHow do we know about the change?
ModelCausality, Dependence, Scenarios and ForecastWhy did it happen?
RegulatorAuthorized owner of the solution and routeWho has the right to decide?
ImpactNorm, project, program, resource or organizational actionWhat will be done?
FeedbackAcceptance, independent verification and adjustmentIs there an effect?

MODEL CHANGE

From Static to Dynamic Balance

Static approachSystemic approach
Date photoStatus, trend, forecast and early signal
One indicatorSet of stocks, flows, quality and constraints
Industry boundaryInter-balance causal relationships
Report on activitiesProven state change
Budget as an entranceResource as a liability for result
Mean valueCorridor, risk threshold and distribution
Manual approvalFormalized locks of law, resource and security

FORMALIZATION

Mathematical Core

For balance b, the state at time t is described by the vector X_b(t): stocks, flows, structure, quality, and risk. The target corridor is defined by the lower and upper boundaries [L_b(t), U_b(t)].

ComponentWorking formulaMeaning
DynamicsX(t+1) = X(t) + In(t) − Out(t) + ΔQ(t)Stocks change flows and qualitative effect
DeviationD_b(t) = distance(X_b(t), [L_b(t), U_b(t)])Zero distance means getting into the corridor.
ScenarioX(t+1) = F(X(t), u(t), W(t), ε(t))The u solution acts via W connections and external factors ε
Integral effectE = Σ w_b·ΔN_b − Σ λ_r·R_rNormalized effect minus risk penalty
ReadinessR = min(LEG, DAT, RES, CYB, TRC, VAL)The system is ready for the weakest mandatory gateway

OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR

KRISTALL741: the complete management address

MeasurementCodesPurpose
Balance systemB01–B19What is managed
Decision phaseL01–L13At what stage is the decision
ScaleS1–S3Where authority and results apply
ExampleDecryption
SUR-B16-L10-S1Federal resource-calculated model of financial balance
SUR-B12-L12-S2Regional validation of the water balance result
SUR-B06-L11-S3Project execution on the balance of work and employment

CLASSIFICATIONER

Nineteen interconnected systems

CodeBalance systemTarget result
B01DemographySustainable reproduction and managed migration
B02HealthIncreased healthy life expectancy
B03Family, income and social well-beingIncome adequacy and vulnerability reduction
B04Education, skills and talentsSkills outpace structural demand
B05Culture, values and social cohesionIncreased connectivity while maintaining diversity
B06Work and employmentDecent productive employment
B07Food and APCAffordable food while preserving soil and water
B08Space and resettlementBalanced Resettlement and Connectivity
B09Housing and public infrastructureAvailability, reliability and energy efficiency
B10Transport and logisticsMinimizing time and costs for sustainability
B11Fuel and energy balanceReliable and affordable energy supply
B12WaterWater without exhaustion
B13Natural capital and ecological capacityThe impact does not exceed the ability to recover
B14Materials, resources and circularityMaterial intensity reduction and cycle closure
B15Production and cross-sectoral linkagesSustainable production and technological connectivity
B16Finance, investment and budgetThe resource is provided and related to the result
B17Science, technology and innovationResearch turns into a confirmed effect
B18Digital environment, information and dataAffordable quality data in cyber resilience
B19Security, sovereignty and institutional sustainabilityThe system can withstand threats without losing legitimacy

LIFE CYCLE

Thirteen Phases of Decision

CodePhaseThe main question
L01Signal or needWhat's changed?
L02Identification of data and sourcesWhat is the assessment based on?
L03Data validationCan we trust the data?
L04Base LineWhere does the change begin?
L05Balance and Causal DiagnosisWhy did the rejection occur?
L06Forecast and scenariosWhat will happen with the solutions?
L07Purpose, standard and allowable deviationWhat is the result and limit of risk?
L08Options for solutionWhat alternatives are available?
L09Legal Expertise and SecurityIs a solution acceptable?
L10Resource and calculation modelWhat is the solution?
L11Implementation and coordinationWho, what and when does it work?
L12Monitoring, acceptance and validationIs there an effect?
L13Adjustment, scaling or closingWhat to change in the next cycle?

MASSHTAB

Three Levels of Management

CodeScaleModel solution
S1National / FederalNational goal, intersectoral balance, federal resource
S2Regional / InterregionalTerritorial scenario and inter-agency portfolio
S3Municipal / Object / ProjectSpecific execution, acceptance and confirmed effect

Scales do not form an administrative hierarchy of data. They share authority, detail, frequency of observation, and responsibility for the result, while maintaining a common end-to-end code.

SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS

Balanced connectivity

Any significant decision changes several balances simultaneously. Therefore, optimization of one circuit is permissible only after checking the direct, indirect and delayed effects in related systems.

DecisionDirect effectRelated EffectsRisk of Local Optimization
New productionB15 issueB06 labor; B11 energy; B12 water; B13 ecology; B16 investmentGrowth of output in case of resource deficit or environmental damage
Housing constructionB09 housingB08 settlement; B10 transport; B11 energy; B12 waterApartments without availability and communal capacity
Digital platformB18 dataB04 skills; B17 technologies; B19 securityService without trust, data quality or sustainability
Modernization of AICB07 FoodB06 labor; B12 water; B13 ecology; B14 materialsProductivity in soil degradation and water stress
Budget measureB16 FinanceAll balances through the resourceManagement of funds without change of status

PASSPORT BALANCE

B01. Demography

FieldContents
Managed ObjectPopulation, age structure, migration and reproduction
Target corridorSustainable reproduction and managed migration
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB02, B03, B04, B06, B08
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B02. Health

FieldContents
Managed ObjectPublic health, access to care and prevention
Target corridorIncreased healthy life expectancy
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB01, B03, B06, B07, B13
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B03. Family, income and social well-being

FieldContents
Managed ObjectHouseholds, income, expenditure, poverty risks and support
Target corridorIncome adequacy and vulnerability reduction
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB01, B02, B06, B09, B16
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B04. Education, skills and talents

FieldContents
Managed ObjectHuman capital, access to knowledge and matching skills
Target corridorSkills outpace structural demand
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB01, B05, B06, B17, B18
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B05. Culture, values and social cohesion

FieldContents
Managed ObjectCultural heritage, trust, identity and participation
Target corridorIncreased connectivity while maintaining diversity
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB01, B03, B04, B08, B19
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B06. Work and employment

FieldContents
Managed ObjectLabour force, productivity, quality of employment and mobility
Target corridorDecent productive employment
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB01, B03, B04, B15, B17
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B07. Food and APC

FieldContents
Managed ObjectFood security, agro-production and supply chains
Target corridorAffordable food while preserving soil and water
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB02, B08, B12, B13, B15
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B08. Space and resettlement

FieldContents
Managed ObjectTerritorial structure, availability of centers and density of functions
Target corridorBalanced Resettlement and Connectivity
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB01, B09, B10, B12, B13
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B09. Housing and public infrastructure

FieldContents
Managed ObjectHousing, utilities and environmental quality
Target corridorAvailability, reliability and energy efficiency
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB03, B08, B10, B11, B12
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B10. Transport and logistics

FieldContents
Managed ObjectMovement of people and goods, capacity and accessibility
Target corridorMinimizing time and costs for sustainability
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB06, B08, B09, B11, B15
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B11. Fuel and energy balance

FieldContents
Managed ObjectGeneration, networks, consumption, reserve and emissions
Target corridorReliable and affordable energy supply
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB09, B10, B13, B14, B15
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B12. Water

FieldContents
Managed ObjectReserves, fences, quality, losses, sanitation and ecosystem needs
Target corridorWater without exhaustion
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB07, B08, B09, B13, B15
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B13. Natural capital and ecological capacity

FieldContents
Managed ObjectEcosystems, biodiversity, pollution and load limits
Target corridorThe impact does not exceed the ability to recover
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB02, B07, B11, B12, B14
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B14. Materials, resources and circularity

FieldContents
Managed ObjectRaw materials, waste, secondary resources and critical stocks
Target corridorMaterial intensity reduction and cycle closure
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB11, B13, B15, B16, B17
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B15. Production and cross-sectoral linkages

FieldContents
Managed ObjectOutput, capacity, cooperation, import dependence and value chains
Target corridorSustainable production and technological connectivity
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB06, B10, B11, B14, B16
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B16. Finance, investment and budget

FieldContents
Managed ObjectIncome, expenditure, capital, debt, liquidity and investment flows
Target corridorThe resource is provided and related to the result
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB03, B11, B14, B15, B17
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B17. Science, technology and innovation

FieldContents
Managed ObjectKnowledge, research, development, transfer and technological sovereignty
Target corridorResearch turns into a confirmed effect
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB04, B06, B14, B15, B18
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B18. Digital environment, information and data

FieldContents
Managed ObjectData, Computing, Communication, Platforms, Models and Trust
Target corridorAffordable quality data in cyber resilience
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB04, B10, B15, B17, B19
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

PASSPORT BALANCE

B19. Security, sovereignty and institutional sustainability

FieldContents
Managed ObjectRisks, Reserves, Law, Institutional Trust and Management Continuity
Target corridorThe system can withstand threats without losing legitimacy
Minimum measurementsStock/coverage; inbound and outbound flows; quality; availability; sustainability; risk
Model impactsNorm; program; project; infrastructure, organizational or resource solution
Related Balance SheetsB01, B05, B11, B16, B18
Proof of resultChange in reference line + source + method + independent validator
  • The state is assessed not by a single figure, but by a combination of level, distribution, dynamics and risk.
  • The solution goes through phases L01 to L13 and receives the scale S1, S2 or S3.
  • Threshold values and formulas are taken from the catalog 260 or approved for the pilot.
  • Acceptance requires proof of a change in status, not just a report on activities performed.

STANDARDIZATION

Catalogue 260: Measurement standards

KRISTALL741 answers the question “Where does the management action take place?”, while catalogue 260 answers “How is it measured and verified?” The number 260 is the catalogue’s designed capacity, not a requirement to apply all indicators at once.

GroupRequired fields
IdentificationCode, name, balance, version, validity period
DefinitionIndicator sense, unit, perimeter, inclusions and exceptions
FormulaNumeral, denominator, conversion, rounding and uncertainty
SourceOwner, Primary System, Frequency and Quality
CorridorMinimum, purpose, maximum risk, duration and basis
ConnectionsDependencies and inter-balance factors
ValidationMethod of verification, evidence, expert and acceptance criteria

ANALYTICS

EQUILIBRIUM: Observation and scenarios

  • Collects signals and confirmed data on B01-B19;
  • forms a baseline and shows a deviation from the corridor;
  • Assesses inter-balance dependencies and delays;
  • compares scenarios “without a solution” and “with a solution”;
  • shows limitations, uncertainty and early warnings;
  • After execution, compares the forecast with the fact and updates the model.

TRAVELING

SUR-810: resource and design trace

SUR-810 links the solution to the source of the resource, the calculation model, the obligation, the execution and the confirmed result. Pilot 810 is used as a project code and traceability register, rather than as a currency or parallel currency.

ContactWhat is fixed
Solution → resourceLegal basis, limit, source, period and owner
Resource → liabilityRecipient, destination, milestones and control points
Obligation → PerformanceFacts, documents, payments in legal currency and results
Execution → balanceChange in indicator relative to baseline
Balance → new cycleAdjustment of model, decision and resource allocation

VALIDATION

ESG-IR 1.0: proof of exposure

LevelQuestionEvidence
Sign inWhat was allocated?Resource, authority, source data
ActivitiesWhat's done?Events, documents, acts, journal
WithdrawalWhat is created?Object, service, power, product
ResultWhat has changed for the recipient?Pre/post and control scenario
ImpactHow has the balance changed?Normative effect, contribution and sustainability

DIGITAL CONTOUR

Information architecture

LayerPurposeKey object
NormativePowers, limitations and standardsRule
SemanticB01–B19, L01–L13, S1–S3, catalog 260Classifier
DataSources, quality, origin and versionsData Set
ModelDiagnostics, dependencies, scenarios and prognosisModel
DocumentalPassports, Decisions, Signatures and StatusesAuthoritative record
ProcessRoutes, roles, timelines and controlsEvent
EvidentiaryExecution, acceptance, result and archiveResult file

MEMORY AND CONTINUATION

Intelligence of the Archive of Heritage Preservation

The legacy preservation archive forms the long-term memory of the balance system. It preserves not only the final documents, but also the context of the decision: the state of balance, sources, model versions, authority, alternatives, resource, execution, evidence and consequences. Archive intelligence returns this memory to a new cycle as a verifiable historical context.

FunctionWhat is maintained or formedCommunication with management
HeritageCultural, scientific, production, territorial and institutional objectsB05 as a profile balance; context for B01–B19
Authoritative recordOriginal, signature, date, origin, access rights and checksumInvariable basis of the decision and evidence
Version memoryBaselines, indicators, models, scenarios, decisions and actual resultsComparability of cycles L01-L13 in time
Semantic BondingFaces, Places, Events, Objects, Balances, Phases and ScalesFinding connections and restoring the causal context
Intellect ArchiveSimilar cases, long-term trends, continuity gaps and risk of lossDiagnostic and scripting tool EQUILIBRIUM
Return to CycleArchive with cited sources and level of confidenceIncluded in the solution file SUR-810 and verification ESG-IR 1.0

ORGANIZATION

Governance, roles and responsibilities

RoleResponsibilityCan't.
Balance holderTarget corridor, dependencies and outcomeSubstitution of powers of authorities
Data OwnerSource, quality, frequency and originHide Data Limitations
Model ownerFormulas, scenarios, versions and uncertaintyForecasting as a fact
ApprovingLegal decision on a specific versionApprove without resource and verification
Person carrying out the workAction, time, resource and primary evidenceTake own result
ValidatorIndependent verification of the resultModify Primary Data
SUR OperatorIntegration, routes, registers and SLAMake meaningful decisions

CONTROL

Decision-making gateways

GatewayVerificationStop-condition
LEGRights and powersNo legal basis or competence
DATData and originSource not confirmed or quality below threshold
MODModels and scenariosAssumptions or Sensitivity not disclosed
RESResource and reserveObligation not secured
CYBSecurityAccess, integrity, or sustainability is compromised
TRCTraceabilityThe decision is not related to documents and execution
VALValidationNo acceptance criteria or independent reviewer

IMPLEMENTING

Pilot 30 / 100 / 365 days

TimeframeWorksResult
0–30 daysSelection of the task; 3–5 balances; baseline; right; data; ownerPilot's passport and stop criteria
31–100 daysClassifiers; passport modules; model; prototype; routeWork outline and base line
101–180 daysParallel mode; check of calculations and loadComparison with the current process
181–300 daysExecution; monitoring; evidence; archiveFull evidence cycle
301–365 daysIndependent assessment of law, effect, safety and valueStop/revise/scale solution

KPI

Pilot performance

IndicatorModal thresholdMeaning
Passport modules are filled100%Governance and responsibility
Critical data is of origin100%Trust in calculations
Completeness of mandatory metadata≥95%Quality of Registry
Authorized Authority Verified100%Legal admissibility
Decisions are related to resource and result≥95%Full evidence cycle
Time to Recover Decision File≤15 minutesControllability
Lost evidence0Integrity
Violations of Stop Conditions0Law and safety

RISKS

Key risks and measures

RiskManifestationMeasure
Formal digitalizationOld reports received new codesCheck full cycle and proof of result
Local optimizationOne balance is improved by anotherMandatory inter-balance assessment
False accuracyForecast issued for factRanges, Sensitivity and Model Versions
Overload by indicators260 fields are used simultaneouslyProfile of indicators by task and scale
SubstitutionThe algorithm makes a decisionHuman-in-command and legal gateways
Unsecured solutionNo resource or reserveBlocking RES to execution
Loss of trustThe source and change of the data are unclearOrigin, Versions and Event Log
Vendor dependencyClosed formats and modelsOpen schemes, exports and migration plan

MASSTABING

Road map to 2030–2036

PeriodFocusBenchmark
2026Methodology, Law, Classifiers and BaselinePilot's readiness
2027Pilot 3–5 related balance sheetsIndependently confirmed full cycle
2028Compatibility of registries, documents and modelsGeneral identifiers and API
2029–2030Regional portfolios and cross-sectoral solutionsRelationship to national objectives
2031–2036Adaptive control and early signalsScenario management of long-term balance sheets

DECISION

Draft instruction

Proposed wording for further legal development:

  1. Prepare a draft target model of development management based on 19 interconnected balance systems.
  2. Determine the customer of the pilot, the owner of the result, operator, object, territory and legal regime.
  3. In the period up to 100 days to develop a classifier B01–B19, Phases L01–L13, Scale S1–S3 Passports and Modules.
  4. Approve the minimum catalog profile 260, data sources, formulas, corridors and validation rules.
  5. Ensure that decisions are linked to documents, resources, execution and evidence through SUR-810.
  6. Conduct a 12-month pilot and independent assessment of legal, organizational, information, financial and cyber readiness.
  7. As a result, submit a proposal for stopping, finalizing or scaling.

CONCLUSION

Final position

Balances are a management system when each has a managed object, a target corridor, verifiable data, a causal model, a legitimate decision holder, a secured exposure, and evidence-based feedback. Nineteen balances do not form a list of topics, but a system of systems: a change in one circuit is considered through consequences for others.

KRISTALL741 makes the system addressable; Catalogue 260, measurable; EQUILIBRIUM, observable and capable of scenario analysis; SUR-810, traceable; and ESG-IR 1.0, evidence-based. Together, they create an architecture for the transition from managing documents and expenditure to managing verified changes in the state of a country, territory, sector and person.

A strong system doesn’t eliminate the differences between balances — it makes their connections visible, their decisions legitimate, their resources secure, and the outcome provable.

ANNEX A

Official sources and standards

1. Federal Law No. 172-FZ "On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation"

2. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 309 of 07.05.2024 on national goals up to 2030 and for the future up to 2036

3. Rosstat: National accounts and input-output base tables

4. Rosstat: Federal monitoring of "cost-release" for 2026

5. ISO 37120-2020: Indicators of urban services and quality of life

6. GOST R 7.0.97-2025: organizational and administrative documentation

7. GOST R ISO 15489-1-2019: document management

ANNEX B

Glossary

TermDefinition
BalanceSystem for managing the state of the object through observation, model, decision, resource, execution and feedback
Target corridorAcceptable state range with target value, time and risk limits
InterbalanceThe causal or resource effect of changing one balance sheet to another
Module 741Combination of balance, solution phase and management scale
Catalog 260Project Register of Standards, Indicators, Formulas, Sources and Rules of Verification
Base LineConfirmed reference state relative to which the change is measured
GatewayMandatory verification, without successful passage of which the transition is prohibited
Proven resultMeasurable change associated with the solution and confirmed by sources and independent verification

ANNEX C

Methodological reservations

  • Classification B01-B19 is a design architecture and is specified after a survey of authority and data.
  • Formula 19×13×3=741 Describes the addressing of management modules, not the number of bodies, information systems, or reports.
  • Catalog 260 specifies the maximum design capacity of standards; for each solution, a minimum sufficient profile is used.
  • Models and forecasts support decision, but do not replace law, political responsibility and professional judgment.
  • Economic cost-output tables are an important source of cross-industry linkages, but do not exhaust social, environmental, spatial, and institutional balances.
  • Scaling is only possible after independent verification of legality, security, compatibility, provability and economic feasibility.

End of document

Other published edition: BALANCES — CONTROL SYSTEM Balances_as_Management_System_SUR.pptx · Web Text +

The Russian Development Management Architecture

RELATED

BALANCES

19 SYSTEMS × 13 FAZ × 3 MASSTABA = 741 MODULES

Status → Objective → solution → resource → execution → Proven result → new cycle

Author: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich | version 1.0 | 28 August 2026

Balances and there is a management system

MAIN THESIS

PURPOSE

STATE

DECISION

RESULT

Management exists only when the state is measured, the deviation is explained, the decision is legal, the resource is provided, the execution is confirmed, and the result is returned to a new cycle

SES — a shell of reconciliation, addressing and evidence of interrelated balances

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Why management breaks down without balance sheets

DIAGNOSIS

OBJECTIVE

INDICATORS

BUDGETS

REPORTS

Separated from fact

They do not explain the reasons

Not related to effect

Replace the result

Industry optimization can improve its performance and simultaneously destroy the neighboring balance

Balanced approach returns causality, constraints and feedback

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

One Balance - Full Control Outline

DEFINITION

OBJECT

STATE

CORRIDOR

OBSERVATION

MODEL

CREDENTIALS

EFFECTS

RESOURCE

FEEDBACK

Balance = object + Objective + surveillance + Model + Authority + Impact + resource + execution + feedback

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Dynamic balance controls deviation

FORMALIZATION

X(t+1) = X(t) + In(t) − Out(t) + ΔQ(t)

condition tomorrow = condition today + inputs − outputs + quality effect

TARGET CORRIDOR

Deviation D = state distance to allowable corridor

The system condition is optimized while maintaining mandatory restrictions

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Nineteen systems form a system of systems

KRISTALL741

MAN AND SOCIETY

TERRITORY AND LIFE

PRODUCTION AND CAPITAL

KNOWLEDGE AND SOVEREIGNTY

B01 Demographics

B07 Food

B14 Materials

B17 Science

B02 Health

B08 Space

B15 Manufacturing

B18 Data

B03 Family and income

B09 Housing

B16 Finance

B19 Security

B04 Education

B10 Transport

B05 Culture

B11 Energy

B06 Labour

B12 Water

B13 Nature

This is not 19 new departments - it is 19 through the contours of the existing institutions

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

19 × 13 × 3 = 741 Module

ADDRESS OF MANAGEMENT

BALANCES

FAZ

MASSTABA

what is managed

Where is the solution

Where the result works

SUR-B16-L10-S1

financial balance • resource model • federal scale

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Thirteen Phases of Decision

LIFE CYCLE

L01

L02

L03

L04

L05

L06

L07

Signal

Sources

Verification

Baseline

Diagnostics

Scripts

Corridor

L08

L09

L10

L11

L12

L13

Options

Right

Resource

Implementation

Validation

Adjustment

Result L12 and knowledge L13 become input for new signal L01

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

One Balance - Three Levels of Solution

MASSHTAB

national target • intersectoral balance • federal resource

NATIONAL

territorial scenario • interagency portfolio

REGIONAL

specific performance • acceptance • confirmed effect

PROJECT

Common code retained - powers, detail, and frequency of observation vary

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Change several balances at the same time

SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS

B06 LABOR

B12 WATER

DECISION

B11 ENERGY

B13 ENVIRONMENT

Local optimization is prohibited if the associated balance goes beyond the mandatory limit

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

New production: output growth is not equal to development

Example:

B15

B06

B11

B12

B13

B16

EDITION

WORK

ENERGY

WATER

ENVIRONMENT

FINANCE

+ Power

+ employment

− reserve

− Security

+ Load

− capital

Balanced solution

production increases without violating mandatory restrictions on labor, energy, water, ecology and finance

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Control keeps the system within acceptable limits

TARGET CORRIDOR

AVAILABLE CORRIDOR

MINIMUM

PURPOSE

RISK LIMIT

Why the corridor is more important than one goal

It takes into account the minimum acceptable state, desired outcome, risk limit, distribution, seasonality and timing.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Heritage preservation archive brings experience back to new cycle

CONTOURS OF SOLUTIONS AND MEMORY

Right

DATA

MODEL

DECISION

RESOURCE

EXECUTION

RESULT

→ new cycle memory

result → memory

INTELLIGENCE OF THE ARCHIVE OF HERITAGE

primary sources • version • context • similar cases • risks of loss • cited archival reference

Archive does not rewrite source or make decision: fact, interpretation and uncertainty are separated

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Uniform rules for measurement and verification

CATALOGUE 260

RCD

DEFINITION

FORMULA

SOURCE

Balance • Version

meaning • perimeter

numerator • denominator

owner • frequency

CORRIDOR

LINKS

VALIDATION

minimum • target • risk

Dependencies • coefficients

Method • Expert

741 Answers "where management operates" • 260 "How to Measure and Prove"

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Watch • explain • predict • correct

EQUILIBRIUM

SIGNAL

BASIC LINE

DIAGNOSIS

SCENARIUM

COMPARISON

what has changed

Where to start

Why it happened

What will happen next

Forecast against the fact

EQUILIBRIUM offers verifiable options and consequences, but does not make a legally significant decision instead of a person

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Resource and estimated footprint

SUR-810

Base •

DECISION

source • limit • reserve

RESOURCE

Recipient • Stage • Term

COMMITMENT

fact • document • payment

EXECUTION

modification • validation

BALANCE

810 — project code and traceability register, not parallel currency

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Proof of impact instead of an activity report

ESG-IR 1.0

ENTRANCE

ACTIVITIES

EXIT

RESULT

EFFECTS

What is allocated

What's done

What is created

what has changed

How the balance has changed

Budget implementation ≠ Implementation of activities ≠ Proven result

Acceptance requires a change with respect to the baseline and independent verification

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Roles are divided - the result remains personal

RESPONSIBILITY

OWNER OF BALANCE

DATA OWNER

OWNER OF MODEL

corridor • dependencies • result

Quality • Frequency • Origin

Formulas • scenarios • Version

CONFIRMING

EXECUTOR

VALIDAR

Legal Decision •

Validity • Term • Proof

independent verification

The algorithm supports the decision - the authorized person accepts and signs it

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Readiness is equal to the weakest mandatory gateway

STOP CONDITIONS

LEG

DAT

MOD

RES

CYB

TRC

VAL

LAW

DATA

MODEL

RESOURCE

PROTECTION

SLODE

NOTES

Readiness = min(LEG, DAT, MOD, RES, CYB, TRC, VAL)

If one mandatory gateway is not passed, the transition to execution is prohibited

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

30 / 100 / 365 days

PILOT

One integrated task • 3–5 Balance Sheets • Measurable result

0–30

101–180

301–365

PERIMETER

PARALLEL MODE

EVALUATION

Problem • Right • Data

comparison • load

stop • finish • scale

31–100

181–300

PROTOTIP

FULL CYCLE

passport • model • baseline

Execution • evidence

The first scale is to prove a complete management cycle, not to connect the maximum systems

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Measure manageability and state change

KPI

100%

100%

100%

Passport Modules

Origin of Critical Data

completeness of metadata

authority verified

≤15 min

decisions are related to the result

the Decision File

Lost evidence

Violations of Stop Conditions

Main KPI — confirmed improvement of selected balances relative to the baseline

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Start the management system through balance sheets

DRAFT DECISION

Approve thesis

Balances and there is a management system

Fix architecture

B01–B19 • L01–L13 • S1–S3

Appointing owners

balance • data • model • result

Collect profile 260

indicators • formula • corridors

Launch the pilot

100 Design Days • 12 Months of Inspection

Solution: one full cycle • 3–5 Balance Sheets • independent evaluation • stop / modify / scale

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Sources cited in presentation 8

  • Author's concept "Balance - control system", version 1.0, 28.08.2026.
  • [/Sources]
  • Rosstat: basic tables "cost-output" — https://rosstat.gov.ru/statistics/accounts
  • GOST R ISO 15489-1-2019 — https://protect.gost.ru/gost/details/2497916a-b91d-4248-a025-f898920fa001
  • Author's concept "Intelligence of the Archive of Heritage Preservation", 28.08.2026.
  • Federal Law No172-FZ — https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201406300016
  • Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No309 — https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202405070015
  • Author's concept "Balances - control system", 28.08.2026.

Published files

Strategy · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM Victory Doctrine

Source Status: Primary Document

A strategic doctrine, materials supporting an address and a presentation of balances for discussion at government level.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/doktrina-pobedy-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM

Conceptual doctrine

2026

Document status

The Doctrine of Victory is a philosophical and strategic concept. It is not an operational military manual and does not contain instructions on how to conduct combat operations. Its subject is the principles of sustainable victory of the state and society through protection, conflict management, law, technological superiority, sustainability, restoration and transition to peace.

Subject: Victory is seen as a systemic outcome: preserving the viability of the state, society and culture while achieving a politically and legally sustainable outcome of the conflict.

Scale: Personality → society → state → international system → civilization horizon.

The main criterion: After victory, the system should be more stable, freer in choosing the future and less dependent on the repetition of violence.

Short formula

Victory = PROTECTION + VOLIA + LAW + GOVERNANCE + SUSTAINABILITY + DEVELOPMENT + WORLD

Contents

1. Preamble

2. Definition of Victory

3. Need a war?

4. The Seven Laws of Victory

5. The Twelve Principles of Doctrine

6. The Seven Contours of Victory

7. Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

8. Cycle: from threat to sustainable peace

9. Victory of the state

10. The victory of society and people

11. Economy of Victory

12. Science, technology and information

13. Culture, memory and ethics

14. International contour

15. System of indicators

16. Stages of implementation

17. Red lines of doctrine

18. Final Theses

1. Preamble

War is the ultimate form of political and social conflict in which the price of error is measured by human lives, the destruction of institutions, and the loss of the future. Therefore, a mature state is obliged to think not only in the categories of resistance, but also in the categories of prevention, sustainability, limitation of damage, recovery and end of the conflict.

The doctrine proceeds from the proposition that conflict is inevitable, but destruction is not inevitable. Strength is necessary as the ability to protect existence and freedom of decision; however, strength alone does not create victory. Victory arises when the state’s will is united with law, intelligence, economy, technology, public trust, and the clear goal of peace after conflict.

2. Definition of Victory

Victory is the achievement of a politically significant goal while maintaining or restoring the viability of the system and creating conditions under which a return to the destructive phase becomes less likely.

Victory has five dimensions: protective - preventing the loss of a critical one; political - achieving an acceptable and recognized result; human - minimizing irreparable losses; systemic - maintaining manageability and development ability; temporary - the stability of the result after the acute phase of the conflict.

Therefore, military success may be an element of victory, but not identical with it. Tactical luck, which destroys strategic stability, is not a victory.

3. Need a war?

War is not a value and should not become an end in itself. The state must be ready to defend itself, because giving up the ability to defend can encourage coercion. But the willingness to defend and the desire for war are the opposite.

War becomes a reality where the mechanisms of politics, law, trust, deterrence and reconciliation of interests are insufficient or deliberately rejected. Therefore, the task of an intelligent system is not to deny conflicts, but to reduce the likelihood of their transition into a destructive form.

Maturity criterion: the state is able to defend itself without making war the basis of identity and without making the continuation of the conflict more important than the future.

4. The Seven Laws of Victory

1. Law of Purpose. Victory begins with an accurate determination of what needs to be protected and what condition is considered a sufficient result. An undetermined goal turns power into an infinite expenditure.

2. Law of price. The price of achieving the goal is part of the goal itself. The result that has destroyed the human, economic, or institutional foundation of the future is strategically depreciating.

3. The law of will. The system wins not only with resources, but with the ability to maintain political will, manageability, trust and discipline under pressure.

4. Law of Connection. The army, economy, management, infrastructure, science, culture and society form a single contour. Failure of one critical node can nullify the benefits of others.

5. The law of adaptation. The advantage is a system that detects changes faster, recognizes errors, learns and rebuilds.

6. Law of Legitimacy. A force that has lost its legal and moral basis begins to destroy trust within its own system and reduces the stability of the result.

7. Law of completion. The highest ability is not only to withstand conflict, but also to translate the achieved result into sustainable order, recovery and peace in a timely manner.

5. The Twelve Principles of Doctrine

1. The priority of life and preservation of the future.

2. Protection of sovereignty and the ability to decide independently.

3. Clarity of political objectives and sufficiency criteria.

4. Proportionality of means of purpose.

5. Unity of defence, economics, science and public administration.

6. Truthfulness of internal diagnostics and inadmissibility of self-deception.

7. Early warning of threats and work to the stage of irreversible escalation.

8. Technological and intellectual superiority instead of extensive use of resources.

9. Sustainability of infrastructure, communications, data, logistics and basic services.

10. Preserving public trust and human dignity.

11. Readiness to recover simultaneously with protection.

12. Ending the conflict in a form that reduces the likelihood of its recurrence.

6. The Seven Contours of Victory

1. Meaningful outline. Determines what the system is protecting for, what kind of world it seeks to preserve and what kind of future it considers worthy.

2. State coordination circuit. Provides unity of solutions, division of responsibility, crisis management and feedback.

3. Economic contour. Preserves production, finance, employment, resources, logistics and the ability to recover.

4. Scientific and technological contour. Creates the ability to see earlier, to decide more accurately, to protect more effectively and to recover faster.

5. Information circuit. Provides reliability, stability of communication, countering panic and the quality of public understanding of what is happening.

6. Cultural and social contour. Supports solidarity, memory, mutual responsibility and the ability of society not to disintegrate under pressure.

7. Right-ethical contour. Defines the limits of permissible, responsibility, humanitarian obligations and criteria for the legitimacy of decisions.

Note: indicators and contours are intended for further verification, detail and binding to responsible institutions.

7. Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

In the framework of the Doctrine, EQUILIBRIUM is considered as an analytical-coordination architecture: data collection, risk map, scenario modeling, sustainability assessment, conflict detection and support for solutions. This is not a substitute for state institutions or an autonomous subject of power, but a tool for improving the quality of coordination.

The core of architecture connects the seven contours: meaning, coordination, economics, technology, information, culture, and legal ethics. Between them there is a constant feedback: data → evaluation → solution → action → measurement result → adjustment.

The main principle of the Victory Doctrine is EQUILIBRIUM: the speed of understanding and coordination should be higher than the speed of escalation.

8. Cycle: from threat to sustainable peace

1. Observation: fixation of weak signals and deviations.

2. Diagnosis: separation of symptoms from causes.

3. Classification: Identification of the threat level and affected contours.

4. Scenario: Calculation of the consequences of alternative solutions.

5. Coordination: synchronizing responsible institutions.

6. Protection: Minimizing damage and maintaining critical functions.

7. Stabilisation: Stopping the Crisis.

8. Negotiation and legal clearance: translating the achieved situation into sustainable rules.

9. Recovery: The return of people, territories, economies, and institutions to development.

10. Training: analysis of solutions and updating the system.

9. Victory of the state

The victory of the state is the preservation of subjectivity: the ability to make decisions, ensure law, security, basic services, economic turnover and strategic development.

Critically important are: continuity of management, sustainability of communication and data, financial stability, transport and energy, food and medicine, trust in institutions, talent pool and the ability to quickly restore impaired functions.

A strong state is not measured by the scale of mobilization for the sake of mobilization itself, but by how little it is able to protect a large system.

10. The victory of society and people

Society should not be seen as a resource. It is the vehicle of meaning, work, knowledge, family, memory, and the future. Therefore, the protection of human capital is the central criterion of strategic viability.

The victory of society means the preservation of trust between people, social elevators, education, medicine, legal protection, conditions for the family, entrepreneurship, creativity and the return to normal life.

The victory of a person is an opportunity to preserve the dignity of loved ones, the right to the future and participate in the restoration of the country.

11. Economy of Victory

The economy of victory is not an economy of infinite urgency. It is a system that withstands shock, preserves production and core chains, is rapidly reconfigured, protects critical competencies, and is able to move from crisis mode to growth.

Key qualities: diversification, redundancy, financial stability, technological sovereignty in critical positions, logistics connectivity, supplier competition, maintainability, energy efficiency and the ability to scale production without destroying the civil economy.

Criterion: Each invested resource should strengthen future performance, and not only cover current consumption.

12. Science, technology and information

Science provides the ability to see causality and not to substitute persuasion for analysis. Technology makes knowledge sustainable. The information system ensures the quality of decisions and public orientation.

Priorities: risk forecasting, protected data and communication, independent expertise, systems modeling, material and energy efficiency, medicine and rehabilitation, robotization of hazardous work, recovery technologies, environmental monitoring.

AI in this architecture should enhance a person in the analysis and verification of hypotheses, but not abolish the responsibility of officials and not turn into an opaque source of solutions.

13. Culture, memory and ethics

The culture of victory should not be based on hatred. Its foundation is dignity, responsibility, courage, the ability to protect the weak, remember the price of war and appreciate peace.

Memory is not necessary for the reproduction of hostility, but to prevent the repetition of errors. Heroism does not abolish tragedy, and victory does not abolish moral limits.

Ethical criterion: remedies should not destroy the values for which they are protected.

14. International contour

Sustained victory requires an external order in which there are channels of negotiation, verifiable commitments, mechanisms to prevent accidental escalation, and incentives to restore economic and humanitarian ties.

The goal of the international circuit is not to abolish competition, but to create rules that allow us to compete without going to destruction as the main tool of politics.

The long-term criterion is a reduction in the need for all parties to constantly wait for a new war.

15. System of indicators

1. The viability of the state: continuity of management, communication and basic services.

2. Human losses: minimizing mortality, injury, forced displacement and long-term damage.

3. Economic sustainability: maintaining production, employment, financial and logistical capacity.

4. Infrastructure resilience: time to restore critical systems.

5. Technological autonomy: the share of critical competencies and the availability of alternatives.

6. Public trust: the ability of a society to act without decay and mass panic.

7. Legal sustainability: preserving procedures, accountability and protection of rights.

8. The pace of recovery: the speed of transition from crisis mode to development.

9. The risk of re-escalation: the dynamics of the causes that gave rise to the conflict.

10. The future: investing in education, demography, science, culture and quality of the environment.

Note: indicators and contours are intended for further verification, detail and binding to responsible institutions.

16. Stages of implementation

I. Conceptualization. approve definitions, goals, boundaries and scorecards.

II. Sustainability diagnostics. Create a map of critical functions and dependencies.

III. The contours of early warning. link economic, social, technological and infrastructure indicators.

IV. Script center. introduce regular crisis modeling and interdepartmental management exercises.

V. Reservation system. provide alternative communication channels, data, logistics, energy supply and personnel.

VI. Reconstructive contour. Prepare recovery plans in advance, not after destruction.

VII. Public culture of sustainability: teaching people to act in crises without militarizing everyday life.

VIII. International protocols to support channels of de-escalation, humanitarian engagement and reconstruction.

17. Red lines of doctrine

1. The inadmissibility of war as an end in itself.

2. The inadmissibility of undefined goals that turn conflict into an endless process.

3. Inadmissibility of the dehumanization of peoples and groups.

4. The inadmissibility of substitution of analysis by propaganda within the management system.

5. The inadmissibility of the destruction of civil viability for the sake of a demonstrative result.

6. The inadmissibility of transferring political and moral responsibility to the algorithm.

7. The inadmissibility of such a “victory”, after which society loses the ability to develop.

18. Final Theses

1. Power is needed to protect the world, not to replace the world.

2. Victory begins with a clear goal and ends with a stable order.

3. Human life and the future are at the strategic cost of any decision.

4. Tactical success does not equal strategic victory.

5. Superiority is the ability to learn and rebuild faster than a threat.

6. Economics, science, culture, and law are all part of a common safety circuit.

7. Victory without recovery is incomplete.

8. A world without the ability to protect the fragile; a defense without the goal of peace is destructive.

9. EQUILIBRIUM — the contour of understanding and coordination, not the source of unlimited power.

10. The ultimate victory of civilization is the ability to resolve more conflicts without war.

Another published edition: VICTORY DOCTRINE Доктрина_Победы_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Презентация.pdf · web text +

EQUILIBRIUM

Victory as the achievement of sustainable peace, protected sovereignty and ability

to development.

Philosophy of War → Peace Architecture → Victory Doctrine

What in this doctrine is called Victory 02

Not the cult of war, but the ultimate state for which the power of the state is used.

Protection Sustainability Development

Preservation of life, territory, ability of society and the state Transition from survival to growth

sovereignty and critical to withstand pressure without the collapse. economy, science, culture and infrastructure. human potential.

World Subjectivity

Ending the cycle of violence and creating self-righteousness

A sustainable post-war order, defining the future and being responsible for it.

EQUILIBRIUM • Doctrine of Victory

Formula of Victory 03

Victory is a multidimensional outcome, not a single military episode.

Victory = PROTECTION + VOLIA + LAW + GOVERNANCE + SUSTAINABILITY +

DEVELOPMENT + WORLD

Protection Will Law Governance Sustainability Development World

I have news.

Don't let Don't lose Save Don't lose Hold Become Finish

destroy the goal legitimacy system pressure stronger conflict

EQUILIBRIUM • Doctrine of Victory

7 laws of Victory 04 laws connect military, political, economic and civilizational levels.

1 Purpose above funds 5 Price included in result

Power is justified only in connection with a clear political and moral victory, destroying its own future, strategically incomplete.

Purpose.

2 Victory begins before collision 6 The world is projected in advance

Strategic advantage is created by institutions, science, the post-war order can not be left to chance.

economy and unions.

3 Management is stronger than chaos 7 Victory is confirmed by development

The system wins, faster seeing, decisive and final criterion - the ability to live, recover and

Adaptable, growing.

4 Unity is more important than mobilization noise

Society is based on trust, justice and an understandable goal.

EQUILIBRIUM • Doctrine of Victory

12 principles of the Doctrine 05 From them the regime of strategic stability is formed.

1 Clarity of purpose 2 Priority of life 3 Sovereign subjectivity

4 Legal legitimacy 5 Unity of management 6 Scientific validity

7 Economic 8 Information 9 Cultural identity

Endurance Reliability

1 Technological 1 Ability to 1 World Design

Superiority of Recovery 0 1 2

EQUILIBRIUM • Doctrine of Victory

7 system contours of Victory 06 Doctrine becomes a controlled system only when all contours work simultaneously.

1 Meaning 2 Management 3 Security 4 Economics

image of the future, purpose and solution, coordination, protection of the population, resources, production, criterion of the result responsibility of the territory and finance, logistics of infrastructure

5 Science and 6 Information and 7 World and

technologies culture recovery forecast, adaptation, trust, identity, de-escalation, reconstruction, technological reserve protection against radicalization long-term sustainability

EQUILIBRIUM • Doctrine of Victory

Architecture EQUILIBRIUM 07

An analytical and coordination layer that connects data, decisions, execution, and feedback.

THE LAW OF ETHICS

DATA SOLUTION

EQUILIBRIUM

Core Coordination

FORECAST EXECUTION

FEEDBACK

EQUILIBRIUM • Doctrine of Victory

Victory Cycle 08

The doctrine should lead not to eternal mobilization, but to the end of the destructive cycle.

1 2 3 4 5 6

THE THREAT OF PROTECTION OF STABILIZER RECONSTRUCTED WORLD

IYA

detect contain stop decay return functions to secure order advantage

Criterion of mature victory: after the crisis the system becomes

more stable than it was before.

EQUILIBRIUM • Doctrine of Victory

Three reasons for a long Victory 09

Military sustainability is inseparable from economics, science and the quality of human capital.

Economics of Victory Science of Victory Man of Victory

  • • Industrial Sustainability • Forecast and Modeling • Health and Education
  • • Energy and Resource Security • Materials Science • Discipline and Competence
  • • Independent Critical Chains • Communication, AI and Cyber Resilience • Trust and Solidarity
  • • Financial Endurance • Dual Technology • Executive Responsibility
  • • Recovery Reserve • Rapid Implementation Results • Ability to Live After Crisis

Research

EQUILIBRIUM • Doctrine of Victory

How to measure Victory 10

Winning should be checked by indicators, not just declarations.

Reducing losses and risks to the population

Life

speed of decision making and execution

Management

sustainability of production and logistics

Economy

Recovery of critical functions

Infrastructure

tempo of creation and implementation of solutions

Science

trust, cohesion, reduction of radicalization

Society

duration of sustained de-escalation and no recurrence

Peace

EQUILIBRIUM • Doctrine of Victory

Stages of implementation 11

The doctrine must move from philosophy to institutions, data, pilots and normative anchorage.

  • I. Doctrine II. Indexes III. Centre IV. Pilots V. VI.

Coordinators Standards Scalir common concepts, the system of the Ionian territory, regulations, effevdaerniliennoe and goals, principles, indicators contour of the industry, protocols, international threat criteria, EQUILIBRIUM infrastructure audit and the level of sustainability and contours validation of recovery

EQUILIBRIUM • Doctrine of Victory

Victory is not an eternal war

It is the ability to protect life and sovereignty, to preserve governance,

to recover, to become stronger and to create a world that does not reproduce the causes of the next war.

PROTECTION → SUSTAINABILITY → DEVELOPMENT → WORLD

EQUILIBRIUM • 2026

Other published edition: On the consideration of the project "Victory Doctrine" Pismo_A_R_Belousovu_Doktrina_Pobedy_Strategicheskie_balansy.docx · Web Text +

System of strategic decisions and balances to prevent threats, ensure sovereignty and sustainable development of Russia

The victory is the absence of the need for war: the state of Russia, in which it cannot be forced to give up sovereignty, stop in development or be drawn into war on foreign terms.

Dear Andrey Ramovich!

I am forwarding for preliminary expert review the draft conceptual document “Victory Doctrine” and related applications that combine previously developed solutions for strategic balances, early warning, technological sovereignty, cross-industry cooperation and evidence-based results management system.

The proposed approach assumes that modern victory is determined not only by the ability to repel armed aggression, but also by the ability of the state to detect critical imbalances in advance, maintain continuity of management and infrastructure, reproduce technologies and resources, prevent the disruption of national goals and deprive a potential enemy of the opportunity to achieve a political result by force or non-force pressure.

This logic corresponds to the task set by the President of the Russian Federation to integrate the economy of the Ministry of Defense and the power block into the overall economy of the country, linking defense stability with innovative industrial development, as well as provisions of security legislation and strategic planning, providing for threat forecasting, balance, continuity of planning and digital support of public administration.

Essence of proposal

  • to form a common methodology for evaluating strategic decisions through interrelated balances of "threats - goals - resources - abilities - terms - indicators - evidence";
  • create an experienced analytical support circuit for solutions based on the author's architecture "EQUILIBRIUM", not replacing the state information systems and the powers of officials;
  • introduce a single passport of strategic decision, the register of evidence, independent validation and mandatory gates of admission: the result is risk - the economy of the full life cycle;
  • test the model on two limited pilots: one civilian territorial and one protected departmental or dual-use;
  • scale only those solutions that have proven effect, security, legitimacy, resource security and reproducibility.

Proposed role of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation

The Ministry of Defense is offered not the function of managing civil industries and not the transfer of data to the open circuit, but participation in determining the requirements for defense stability, technological and operational readiness, continuity of critical functions and protected exchange of only those aggregate indicators that are necessary for interagency coordination.

Civil and defense contours are organizationally and informationally separated. Information constituting state secrets, operational and mobilization planning shall remain exclusively under the authority of authorized state structures.

Please consider the possibility

  1. identify the relevant unit or responsible official for preliminary examination of materials;
  2. conduct an interdisciplinary expert assessment in terms of defense sustainability, technological sovereignty, full-life cycle economics and interdepartmental planning;
  3. consider the expediency of temporary interdepartmental expert group without formation of a new management body;
  4. determine one civilian and one protected pilot direction with pre-established boundaries, indicators and stopping conditions;
  5. hold a working meeting to present the architecture, list of strategic decisions, balance system and pilot protocol.

At this stage, it is not proposed to approve the “Victory Doctrine” as an official document, assign state status to the project or undertake scaling obligations. It is proposed to test the methodology itself on a limited, reversible and auditable pilot.

Composition of annexes

№DocumentPurpose
1Draft Concept Paper "Victory Doctrine"Purpose, principles, architecture, boundaries and criteria of Victory
2The essence of strategic decisionsSingle set of 19 system solutions and their first practical step
3Strategic balance sheet systemMethodology of indicators, evidence, risks and admission of decisions
4Pilot and draft decisionsStages 100 days — 60 months and formulations for working consideration

With respect,

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov

Initiator of the concept "EQUILIBRIUM" · SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

ANNEX 1

The Doctrine of Victory

Draft Concept Paper on War Prevention, Strategic Sustainability and Russia’s Creative Superiority

STATUS Draft concept paper for preliminary peer review. It is not a normative act and does not replace the current strategic planning documents of the Russian Federation.

1. Main thesis

The formula for victory is the absence of the need for war.

In the modern sense, the Victory consists not only in the ability to repel armed aggression, but above all in creating a state of the state, society, economy, science and infrastructure, in which external pressure does not lead to the loss of sovereignty, internal vulnerability does not develop into a systemic crisis, and potential aggression becomes meaningless and unacceptably costly.

Military force remains a necessary guarantee of security. The doctrine does not oppose the prevention of defense: it binds deterrence, readiness, technological development, economic security and the viability of the country into a single system.

2. Status and subject

The Doctrine of Victory is proposed as an intersectoral conceptual framework that complements the existing documents of strategic planning of the Russian Federation. It does not replace military planning, does not interfere with operational management and does not create a parallel vertical of power.

Subject: Identification and maintenance of strategic balances of the Russian Federation, ensuring sovereignty, security, sustainability and continuity of development.

Object of management: not a separate organization, but a related system of goals, threats, institutions, territories, technologies, resources, infrastructure, solutions and confirmed results.

Boundaries: Artificial intelligence, digital models, and registries support the solution, but do not receive power and personal responsibility.

3. Purpose and objectives

The goal of the Doctrine is to create a permanent mechanism that reduces the likelihood of war, increases the cost of external coercion, preserves Russia’s freedom of strategic choice, and ensures recovery and continued development in any acceptable scenario.

  • Identify critical threats, vulnerabilities and opportunities in advance;
  • Assess the cascading impact of decisions on security, the economy, society and natural systems;
  • to form comparable variants of state decisions with indication of uncertainty;
  • transfer solutions to resource-based programs, projects and control points;
  • Measure the actual result, the damage prevented and the residual risk;
  • Keep knowledge of successful and unsuccessful decisions in the registry for the next cycle.

4. Image of Victory

Victory is achieved if the following conditions are simultaneously ensured:

  • Protected sovereignty and guaranteed strategic deterrence;
  • sustainable public administration and legal certainty;
  • technological, production and personnel independence in critical functions;
  • Sustainable demography, public health and social solidarity;
  • Security of energy, water, food, transport, communications and critical infrastructure;
  • the ability of the economy to withstand prolonged pressure without destroying civilian functions;
  • protected information and cultural space;
  • Russia’s ability to form international relations in which cooperation is more profitable than confrontation.

Victory means the disruption of the political, economic, information and military goals of the aggressor while maintaining the viability of Russia, the manageability of the state and the country's ability to continue development.

5. The Twelve Principles

1. Sovereignty. Critical decisions, data, technology and infrastructure are under national control.

2. Warning. Priority is given to eliminating the causes of the crisis before the transition of the threat to the emergency or military phase.

3. Strategic sufficiency. Resources focus on critical vulnerabilities and points of systemic effect.

4. Unity of security and development. Security is understood as the country’s ability to continue development, and development as a source of sustainability.

5. Balanced approach. One task should not create a critical failure in another area.

6. Evidence. Each solution has a baseline, metrics, owner, resources, and independent verification criteria.

7. Personal responsibility. Models and AI explain the options; the decision is made by the authorized person.

8. Distributed sustainability. Critical functions are not dependent on a single center, supplier, route or technology.

9. Legality. Powers, financing, data and execution are formalized only in the current legal regimes.

10. Separation of contours. Civil and defense data, roles, and access systems are delineated.

11. Open cooperation with a protected core. Science, business and regions participate without transferring state powers to them.

12. Feedback. Forecasting, decision, execution, measurement and adjustment form a continuous cycle.

6. Three levels of architecture

LevelQuestionResult
13 fields of stabilityWhat should maintain viability?Full profile of the state of the country without hiding the failures of the average index
19 Strategic Balance SheetsWhat contradictions need to be kept?Target corridors, thresholds, risk and resource security
20 stages of solutionHow does a signal turn into a result?Traceable cycle from observation to inheritance of experience

This structure serves as an engineering system of completeness. Numbering is a way of addressing data, functions, and responsibility, not a claim to a universal mathematical law.

7. Thirteen fields of sustainability

  1. Security, Defense and Sovereignty.
  2. Public administration and legal sustainability.
  3. Demography and human capital.
  4. Health, biological and health safety.
  5. Science, education and technology.
  6. Industry and production capacity.
  7. Energy and critical resources.
  8. Food, water and natural systems.
  9. Territories, transport, communications and logistics.
  10. Finance, investment and material reserves.
  11. Information, cybersecurity and cognitive resilience.
  12. Social solidarity, culture and historical continuity.
  13. International, foreign economic and allied relations.

For each field, the normative and actual state, the permissible corridor, critical deviations, the forecast on several horizons, the responsible body, recovery resources and the chain of evidence are recorded.

8. Functional contours

ContourParticipantsProduct
StrategicThe President, the Security Council and the Government of the Russian Federation within their competencePriorities, decisions and assignments
DefensiveInstalled system of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian FederationReadiness requirements and protected management
CivilianFOIV, regions, state-owned companies and development institutionsContinuity of civilian functions and development programmes
AnalyticalIAC and EQUILIBRIUMSummary, scenarios and early warnings
Scientific and technologicalRAS, research centers, universities and KBMethods, tests and reproducibility
Project and financialLegitimate budgetary, contractual and investment arrangementsProgrammes provided with resources
ProductionEnterprises and cooperation chainsProduction, capacity and operation
Validation and controlIndependent auditors and auditsConfirmed effect and limitations
InternationalAllies and partners in safe areasCompatibility and reduction of conflict

Signal → balance assessment → State Decision → Program → Project → execution → Verification → adjustment

9. Separation of civil and defense contours

Civil Contour

  • Open and restricted data;
  • socio-economic, infrastructure, environmental and technological indicators;
  • register of civil projects and interaction with regions, science and business;
  • civil budgets, contracts, indicators and admission bodies.

The Defence Contour

  • information constituting a state secret, and other protected information;
  • assessment of defense risks, requirements and readiness indicators;
  • operational and mobilization planning;
  • management of exclusively authorized state structures.

Exchange between the contours is carried out only through certified interfaces and in the amount of aggregate indicators necessary for interagency coordination. Primary private data is not transmitted to the civil platform.

10. Criteria for success

The exact target values shall be approved after the baseline has been determined. Measurable guidelines are offered for the pilot:

  • 100% critical threats of the pilot have a formalized passport, owner and response plan;
  • the time of signal passing and preparation of the interdepartmental decision is reduced by at least 30%;
  • the horizon of reliable early warning is increased by at least 30%;
  • the recovery time of the selected critical function is reduced by 25–40%;
  • Each pilot has a full life cycle budget, control points and independent verification;
  • at least 70% pilot results confirmed by an independent validator;
  • solutions and resource movement have a full audit trail;
  • no unauthorised data transfers have been permitted between the civilian and defence systems;
  • The reduction of systemic risk is confirmed, not only the implementation of activities.

INTEGRATED CRITERIA Russia retains the freedom of strategic choice, stability and ability to develop while reducing the likelihood of war.

11. Institutional boundaries

The doctrine does not provide:

  • creation of a super-agency or transfer of state powers to private and cooperative structures;
  • Intervention of the civilian platform in the operational military management;
  • placement of information constituting a state secret in civil information systems;
  • Autonomous decision-making by artificial intelligence;
  • non-budgetary obligations without a legal basis and confirmed sources of security;
  • exclusive access of an individual operator to government orders;
  • massive collection of personal data without a specific legitimate purpose;
  • public disclosure of information that may create additional vulnerabilities.

The working names "EQUILIBRIUM", "SFERA", "ECO-PPA" and "SPECZASHCHITA" are subject to legal, terminological and information security examination before inclusion in official documents.

ANNEX 2

ESSENCES OF STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS

Single set: individual projects are combined into 19 system solutions, each of which has a state result, the first step and the criterion of admission

STATUS Draft concept paper for preliminary peer review. It is not a normative act and does not replace the current strategic planning documents of the Russian Federation.

This section does not claim to list each industry project. It reduces them to 19 top-level solutions. Transport, energy, biocenoses, materials science, heritage storage, social programs, and international initiatives are seen as implementation portfolios within the overall architecture.

R-01. Doctrine of Victory

To consolidate the prevention of war and the preservation of the ability to develop as a single subject of strategic management.

State Outcome: A common framework linking security, economy, technology, society and infrastructure.

First step: Interdepartmental expert evaluation of the draft document.

Criteria for admission: Consistency of existing powers and documents of strategic planning.

R-02. Strategic balance sheet system

Essence: Evaluate decisions not on one KPI, but on the profile of interrelated goals, resources, risks and consequences.

State result: Identification of delayed and cross-industry failures before scaling.

First step: Adopt a pilot list of balances, indicators and thresholds.

Admission criteria: Basic line, open formula, stress scenario and independent verification.

R-03. Information and Analytical Center

The essence: To create an analytical and management headquarters in two directions: economy and security.

State result: Single consolidated environment, options, instructions and control of execution.

The first step is to determine the customer, the composition of the expert group and one real process.

Admission criterion: the IAC does not receive the powers of the authorities and does not replace departmental centers.

R-04. EQUILIBRIUM OS

Create a digital layer of observation, coordination, evidence, and feedback over existing systems.

State result: Traceable cycle "purpose - register - resource - project - result - feedback".

First step: MVP on 1–3 projects and 10–20 KPI.

Admission criterion: Full audit trail, person in outline and proven win in time or quality of solution.

R-05. Unified registries and digital twin

The essence: To connect stable identifiers of objects, territories, participants, risks, decisions and evidence.

State result: Single version of the state without replacing the official accounting.

First step: Ontology v0.1 and minimum data model.

Criteria for admission: Origin of data, versionability, access rights and absence of duplication of legally significant registers.

R-06. GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM"

ESSENCE: Combine aerospace and ground observation, scientific models and early warning circuit.

State result: Reduction of time from weak signal to confirmed decision.

First step: One territory and 3–5 threat scenarios.

Criteria for admission: At least three independent source classes, validation protocol and conducted teaching.

R-07. Unified unified technologies

Introduction of a common passport of technology and eight levels of readiness from design to infrastructure standard.

State result: Comparability of technologies and prohibition of premature scaling.

First step: EUT passport 0.9 and three pilots.

Admission criterion: Transfer of the level only after confirmation of the result, risk and economy of the previous level.

R-08. National validation system

The essence: to separate the developer, operator, decision owner and independent validator.

State result: Trust in effect, limitations and actual costs.

First step: Methodology, evidence register and requirements for conflicts of interest.

Admissibility criterion: Negative results are maintained on a par with positive ones; essential theses are reproducible.

R-09. SFERA Initiatives

To create a single route of social, scientific, entrepreneurial and regional initiatives.

State Result: Linking each initiative to a threat, a national goal, the owner of the result, and KPI.

The first step: a single passport initiative and qualification procedure.

Admission criteria: Voluntary participation, transparent criteria and lack of promises of state status until the decision of the authorized body.

P-10. ECO-PPA

The essence: To structure the program and project agreements of preventive action around a specific threat and the confirmed result.

Public Result: Mobilization of public and private resources before damage occurs.

The first step is the legal model of one pilot agreement.

Legal source of funding, risk allocation, milestone tranches and independent impact testing.

R-11. SPECZASHCHITA

Essence: To organize cooperative execution: consortia, production, pilots and standard scaling packages.

State result: Full route from initiative to working solution.

The first step: Audit of competencies, charter, 19 plots and the first portfolio.

Admission criterion: The operator does not receive power or exclusive access; rights and assets are confirmed.

R-12. Technological Sovereignty and Industrial Cooperation

The essence: To connect critical technologies, materials, production capacities, personnel and guaranteed demand.

State Result: Reducing the Gap between Scientific Result and Serial Production.

The first step: the Registry of critical chains and 2–3 pilot localization.

Admission criterion: Confirmed TRL/MRL, series economy, quality, supplier replacement and technology rights.

R-13. Energy and infrastructure sustainability

To ensure continuity of critical functions through distributed generation, accumulation, redundancy and autonomy.

State result: Reduction of single points of failure and recovery time.

First step: Passport of one critical function and stress test N−1/N−2.

Tolerance criterion: Power reserve, battery life, life cycle cost and safe mode switching.

R-14. Biocenoses: water, air, land and food

To observe the territory as a living system and to link environmental signals with economic decisions.

State result: Early detection of the source of the deviation and the recovery program.

First step: Biocenose monitoring point and digital passport of the territory.

Admission criterion: baseline, causal hypothesis, instrumental data and no irreversible damage.

R-15. Transport and logistics contour

The essence: Connect transport, supply, warehouses, corridors, backup routes and digital traceability.

State result: Continuity of supply, reduction of delivery time and cost, readiness for stress scenarios.

The first step: Digital twin of a single corridor or supply chain.

Admission criterion: Alternative route, switching time, capacity and proven safety.

R-16. Scientific, educational and academic infrastructure

Restore the coherence of institutions, laboratories, standards, data archives and human resources trajectories.

State result: Science receives the tasks of implementation, industry - verifiable solutions, the state - the register of competencies.

First step: Register of institutions, equipment, methodologies and priorities.

Criteria for admission: Confirmed competence, open methodology, reproducibility and protection of intellectual rights.

R-17. Human development and social sustainability

Link health, education, employment, rehabilitation, civic preparedness and environmental quality.

State Outcome: Human capital is becoming a measurable result of security and development programs.

The first step: Pilot set of indicators and the route of preparation of project teams.

Criteria for admission: Human rights, voluntariness, data protection and proven effect for specific groups.

R-18. Archive for heritage preservation

The essence: to combine the origin, rights, condition, storage conditions and digital copies of the scientific and cultural heritage.

State result: Traceability, preservation and intergenerational transfer of knowledge and values.

The first step is the minimum register of one collection or scientific fund.

Admission criteria: Legal rights, long-term storage standard, integrity, version and independent audit.

R-19. The International Outline of Strategic Stability

ESSENCE: Use scientific, environmental, infrastructure and humanitarian programs to reduce conflict.

State result: A space of mutual interest where cooperation is more profitable than confrontation.

First step: One safe civilian cross-border pilot and compatibility protocol.

Admission criteria: Sovereign data control, mutual benefit, legal certainty, and no hidden obligations.

UNIFORM Initiative → Expertise → Co-operation → resource support → Pilot → independent confirmation → Standard → Scaling.

ANNEX 3

STRATEGIC BALANCE SYSTEM

Strict, reproducible and verifiable acceptance, piloting, scaling and review of decisions

STATUS Draft concept paper for preliminary peer review. It is not a normative act and does not replace the current strategic planning documents of the Russian Federation.

1. Main provision

Victory is determined not by a single achievement, but by a stable state in which national goals are achieved, critical functions are preserved, risks are kept within acceptable limits, the economy reproduces the necessary resources, and the decision made does not create a delayed strategic defeat.

Resources → actions → direct result → public or defense effect → strategic balance change

Any integral index is published only together with a full balance sheet profile. One high value cannot hide the critical failure of security, legality, evidence, vital civilian functions, or defense readiness.

2. Nineteen key balances

B-01. Objectives — resources

Main indicators: Ensuring the full life cycle; confirmed result per ruble; share of unsecured liabilities.

B-02. Threats — Readiness

Key indicators: Coverage of priority threats; the ratio of deployment time to the time of threat development; residual risk.

B-03. Current Sustainability — Long-Term Development

Main indicators: Minimum level of current functions; share of modernization; technical debt; effect on the horizons 1, 3, 6 and 12 years.

B-04. Warning - Response - Recovery

Main indicators: Detection, response and recovery time; prevented damage; cost of the full cycle of the incident.

B-05. Sovereign control - international cooperation

Main indicators: Share of critical functions under national control; concentration of suppliers; switching period.

B-06. Safety - economic efficiency

Key indicators: Prevented expected damage to the cost of the life cycle; the cost of the protected result; budget burden.

B-07. Need - production capacity

Main indicators: Available power to peak demand; loading; reserve; unmet need.

B-08. Funding — Physical Preparedness

Main indicators: Deviation of cost and terms; break of cash performance and physical result; unit cost of production.

B-09. Innovation — reliability

Main indicators: Failure rate; operational readiness; proportion of pilots who have passed into the series; test safety.

B-10. Scientific - technological - production maturity

Main indicators: Breaks TRL/MRL/SRL; certified capacity; period from development to series.

B-11. Human Capital - Automation

Key indicators: Competency; lead time; performance; errors and incidents.

B-12. Centralization - territorial independence

Key indicators: The share of decisions at the minimum sufficient level; speed of interagency decision; regional accessibility.

B-13. Infrastructure load — sustainability reserve

Main indicators: Peak load; power reserve; performance N−1/N−2; recovery time; autonomy.

B-14. Resource consumption — replenishment

Main indicators: Energy, water and material intensity; reserve in days; protection of sources; reuse.

B-15. Data Utility — Information Security

Main indicators: completeness, relevance and compatibility of data; violations; time of detection and termination of access.

B-16. Speed of decision — quality — legality

Main indicators: Full cycle of the decision; result from the first presentation; alterations; cancellations and legal objections.

B-17. Concentration — Distributed Sustainability

Main indicators: Concentration of suppliers and nodes; single points of failure; alternative routes; replacement time.

B-18. Operational effectiveness — social acceptability

Main indicators: Coverage; cost per recipient; distribution of benefits and losses; continuity of vital services.

B-19. Environmental stress - regenerative capacity

Main indicators: Load to the allowable capacity of the territory; prevented damage; speed and completeness of recovery.

Target corridors, weights, data sources and stop criteria are fixed until the result is obtained. Their change requires a new version of the passport, an explanation of the reasons and re-admission.

3. Density indicators

Absolute volumes are supplemented by density indicators so that a large budget or scale does not substitute for efficiency:

D_O = confirmed change in result / life cycle cost

D_T = confirmed change in result / time

D_L = confirmed change in result / man-hours

D_S = Affordable Average Annual Damage/Life Cycle Cost

D_C = Available Critical Ability / Critical Need

D_E = weighted percentage of critical indicators with confirmed evidence

Densities are matched only for the same functions, territories, horizons and stress scenarios. Diverse effects are not reduced to a single monetary value without an open and verifiable transformation technique.

4. Balance and Integral Index

For each KPI, a rationing function is selected in advance: growth is positive; reduction is positive; or the value should be inside the target corridor. The normalized z value ranges from 0 to 1.

B_j = 100 × Q_j × Π max(z_jk, 0,01) ^ α_jk, where Σ α_jk = 1

Q_j is the proof factor; α_jk is the pre-approved weight. The geometric average reduces the possibility of hiding the failure of one critical indicator by the high value of another.

B_j(robust) = min [ B_j(base), B_j(stress) ]

I = 100 × Π [ B_j(robust) / 100 ] ^ w_j, where Σ w_j = 1

At the same time, the worst critical balance, the number of yellow and red balances, the range of uncertainty and the results of the stress scenario are published. Project thresholds and formulas are subject to statistical and expert calibration prior to regulatory application.

5. Risk Check

RI_c = max [ E(L_c) / A_c; CVaR_95,c / C_c ]

E(L_c) - expected damage by risk class; A_c is the expected damage; CVaR_95,c — average damage in the heavy tail of the distribution; C_c is the maximum damage of a heavy scenario.

ZoneThresholdManagement Mode
GreenRI ≤ 0,80Risk below the established limit; staff control
Yellow0,80 < RI ≤ 1,00Pilot with limits, enhanced monitoring and correction plan
KrasnayaRI > 1,00 or prohibited scriptStopping, processing or decision of the authorized body in a special legal regime

The risks to life and health, defence capability, sovereign governance, critical infrastructure, financial sustainability and the environment are not mutually offset.

6. Economic Gateway

NPV* = PV(direct effects) + PV(Prevented damage) + PV(value of sustainability) − LCC − PV(external costs)

Civil solutions

One effect is taken into account only once. For civil decisions are checked NPV, BCR, Life cycle cost, budget availability in a stress scenario and at least two alternatives, including the option without intervention.

Defence solutions

For defense decisions where the monetary assessment of the result is incorrect, cost-effectiveness, change of readiness, prevented damage, survivability, recovery period and ensuring the full life cycle are applied. The negative commercial NPV is not masked: the need must be justified by the task of safety and superiority over alternatives.

7. Register of evidence

For each critical thesis, a record is created: decision and balance identifier; hypothesis being tested; initial and target value; measurement method; primary source; date and version; data owner; independent examiner; class of evidence; uncertainty; deviations and decision made.

ClassBasisRatio
D-0Assumption without observable data0,00
D-1Expert assessment or internal calculation0,40
D-2Instrumental or administrative data0,70
D-3Independent verification or reproduction0,90
D-4Audit, certified measurement or officially confirmed array1,00

Critical to pilot access KPI Must have a class not lower than2. For scaling - not lower than D-3, and safety indicators and actual costs - D-3 or D-4.

8. Traffic lights for decision-making

StatusThe Integral IndexMandatory conditionsDecision
GreenI ≥ 75Critical balances ≥ 65; Q ≥ 0,80; risk green; LCC provided; effect confirmedAllowance for controlled scaling
Yellow55 ≤ I < 75Q = 0,60–0,79; risk is at the limit; economy is sensitiveOnly a limited pilot with limits and stop conditions
RedI < 55Critical balance < 45; Q < 0,60; risk exceeded; no baseline or legal basisStopping or processing

Green integral index in the presence of at least one red critical restriction is prohibited.

9. Passport of every balance

  1. code, name, purpose and boundaries of calculation;
  2. civilian or defense contour and access mode;
  3. a pair of balanced factors and the target corridor;
  4. KPI, units, formulae, reference line and source;
  5. goals for control horizons and density indicators;
  6. Basic, favorable and stressful scenarios;
  7. risk register and tolerance limits;
  8. LCC, NPV/BCR or cost-effectiveness;
  9. class of evidence and independent examiner;
  10. Dependence on other balances and corrective actions;
  11. owners of the result, data, risk and budget;
  12. version, history of changes and the decision of the admission authority.

10. Interim balances

The register retains five states: original balance; forecast balance; post-pilot balance; independently confirmed balance; operational balance.

ΔB_t = B_t − B_(t−1)

Funding is provided in tranches after verifiable interim results have been achieved. Failure to comply with the threshold returns the decision to adjust, scale down or close. Changing the source line after launch is allowed only as a new version with the disclosure of the cause.

11. Separation of civil and defense contours

  • the general methodology is applied without creating a single database of sensitive data;
  • contours have separate registers, budgets, risk models, access rights and admission authorities;
  • only impersonal, declassified or specially prepared units are transferred to the general panel;
  • The defense result does not compensate for a fall below the minimum level of vital civilian functions;
  • Civil economic effect does not compensate for the red level of defense readiness;
  • for dual-use objects, an interface card is issued: the civil minimum of the service, the mobilization need, switching, costs, compensation and return to normal mode.

12. Management cycle

  1. registration of the problem, boundaries and baseline;
  2. development of alternatives, including the option without intervention;
  3. map of affected balance sheets and owners;
  4. verification of data and the register of evidence;
  5. preliminary calculation of the result, risk and economy;
  6. limited pilot's clearance;
  7. Instrumental measurement of the actual result;
  8. independent verification;
  9. sequential gateways: result → risk → economy;
  10. scaling, adjustment or stop;
  11. Monthly monitoring, quarterly review, semi-annual stress test and annual revalidation;
  12. extraordinary review with a significant change in threats, cost, technology or external environment.

A strategic decision is only one that gives a confirmed result, withstands risk, is provided with a full life cycle economy and maintains the stability of the state after achieving the goal.

ANNEX 4

PILOT AND DRAFT DECISIONS

Limited, reversible and auditable testing of methodology before considering scaling

STATUS Draft concept paper for preliminary peer review. It is not a normative act and does not replace the current strategic planning documents of the Russian Federation.

1. Subject of the pilot

The pilot checks not the philosophy and not the brand of the project, but the passage of a full management cycle: a signal → Data → Proof → Model → options → solution → Resource-funded project → Measured effect → independent verification → adjustment.

ContourProposed objectWhat is being checked
CivilianOne area with natural, infrastructural and socio-economic riskEarly warning, continuity of critical function, resource mobilization, public feedback
ProtectedOne departmental or dual-use process determined by the authorized bodyReadiness requirements, secure analytics, aggregated interface with civil contour, no data leakage

2. First 100 days

  1. Appoint a responsible unit and a temporary expert group;
  2. conduct legal, terminological, information security and scientific and methodological expertise;
  3. approve the boundaries of the two pilots, the owners of the result and access modes;
  4. fix baselines, indicators, data sources and stop criteria;
  5. inventory of existing departmental systems, data, sensors, models and production capabilities;
  6. to form passports of threats, decisions, technologies and balances;
  7. create a demo panel without connecting closed primary data;
  8. prepare a TK, feasibility study and financial model of the full life cycle;
  9. conduct scenario learning and independent audit of results;
  10. report: continue, adjust or stop.

3. Road map

StageTimeframeResultGate
Pre-project0–3 monthsMandate, boundaries, legal model, baselines, TKAdmission to the development of the demonstrator
Demonstrator3–6 monthsRegistries, Balance Sheets, Scenarios, Evidence ProtocolWorking closed analytical cycle
Pilots6–12 monthsTwo limited pilots, measurement and independent verificationConfirmed result or reasoned stop
Interdepartmental scale12–36 monthsInterfaces, network of territories and industries, validation centersReproducibility in two independent environments
Institutionalization36–60 monthsRegulatory procedures, personnel system, regular stress testsIntegration of confirmed elements into the state cycle

4. Draft language for working review

  1. To accept the submitted materials for preliminary expert review without giving them the status of an official document.
  2. Determine the profile unit of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation for the assessment of materials in terms of defense stability, technological sovereignty and the economy of the full life cycle.
  3. Consider the feasibility of a temporary interdepartmental expert group without the formation of a new management body.
  4. To instruct to prepare legal, scientific-technical, financial-economic and information-safety conclusions.
  5. Identify one civil and one protected pilot direction; approve the owners of the result, basic indicators, limits and stopping conditions.
  6. Ensure organizational and informational separation of civil and defense contours.
  7. Prepare a TK, feasibility study, data architecture, validation protocol and scenario exercise plan.
  8. To submit an interim report six months later and a final report no later than twelve months after the start of the pilot.
  9. To consider scaling only when the result is confirmed, acceptable risk, provided full life cycle economy and independent verification.

5. Minimum Pilot Set

  • passport of the problem, territory or function and baseline;
  • Map of powers and stakeholders;
  • solution passport and architectural scheme;
  • Data management plan, access modes and cybersecurity;
  • risk register, stress scenarios and stop criteria;
  • financial life cycle model and sources of collateral;
  • test report, indicators and evidence register;
  • the conclusion of an independent validator;
  • plan of operation, recovery, reversibility and scaling.

6. Decision requested from A. R. Belousov

Request to determine the working route of the expert review: the profile unit → interdisciplinary evaluation → temporary expert group → two limited pilots → report on the feasibility of further solutions.

BASES AND MATERIALS

NORMATIVE SUPPORTS AND INTERNAL SOURCES

Normative references are given for expert orientation. In the official preparation of the draft document requires up-to-date legal expertise and verification of the current version of each act.

1. Official grounds

1. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 14.05.2024. Appointment of A. R. Belousov Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation. official text

2. Federal law of 28.12.2010 № 390-FZ. "On security": forecasting, detection, analysis and assessment of threats. official text

3. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 400 dated 02.07.2021. National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation. official text

4. Federal law of 28.06.2014 № 172-FZ. "On strategic planning in the Russian Federation". official text

5. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 633 dated 08.11.2021. Fundamentals of state policy in the field of strategic planning. official text

6. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 145 dated 28.02.2024. Strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation. official text

7. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 309 dated 07.05.2024. National development goals up to 2030 and for the future up to 2036.

8. Meeting of the President of the Russian Federation with the commanders of the military districts, 15.05.2024. The task is to integrate the economy of the Ministry of Defense and the power block into the general economy of the country.

9. Meeting of the President of the Russian Federation with the leadership of the Ministry of Defense, 05.08.2026. Confirmation of the current status of the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation. official text

2. Internal conceptual materials of the project

  • The White Paper of the Cooperative SPECZASHCHITA", version 1.0 from 18 August 2026;
  • GASMPEQUILIBRIUM". Strategic Concept, version 1.0 from 23 August 2026;
  • "Unified technologies", version 1.0 from 23 August 2026;
  • "EQUILIBRIUM. Operating system 1.0", strategic concept, 2026;
  • "Core Mathematics and architecture EQUILIBRIUM", conceptual version 1.0 from 24 August 2026;
  • "We're on the State Council," strategic note for the state review, August 2026.

STATUS OF INTERNAL MATERIALS Materials are author's conceptual developments. Financial instruments, assets, rights, technologies, indicators, partner roles and organizational models require separate legal, scientific, technical, financial and information security verification.

3. Author's mark

Author and initiator: Sergey Sokolov / SOKOL EQUILIBRIS.

System: EQUILIBRIUM - SFERA - ECO-PPA - SPECZASHCHITA.

Editorial Board: 1.0 from 26 August 2026.

Purpose: preliminary expert review; open conceptual material.

Other published edition: DOCTRIA VICTORY PREZENTACIYA_Doktrina_Pobedy_A_R_Belousovu.pptx · web text +

Victory is the absence of the need for war

Strategic decisions and balances to prevent threats

Ensuring Russia’s Sovereignty and Sustainable Development

Materials for the appeal to the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation

A. R. Belousov

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 26 August 2026

Victory is the absence of the need for war

MAJOR THESIS

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

The state wins when external pressure is not able to:

Military strength is a guarantee.

The doctrine combines deterrence, preparedness, economics, science, and infrastructure into a single warning system.

To deprive Russia of a sovereign choice

stop the development of economy and technology

Disrupt management and critical infrastructure

War on other people’s terms

2 / 16

Methodology strengthens the solution

STATUS AND BORDERS

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

It does not create a parallel vertical and does not replace the current control.

WHAT IS ADDED

WHAT STAYS INDISCRIMINATE

• single passport of strategic decision

• 19 interrelated balances

• Evidence and independent validation

• gate: result → Risk → economy

• reversible pilots before scaling

• state powers belong to the state

• operational and mobilization management - in the established contour

• private data is not transmitted to the civil platform

• AI supports but does not make power decisions

3 / 16

Architecture of completeness: 13 × 19 × 20

ARCHITECTURE

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

Sustainability Fields

Strategic Balance Sheets

Stages of decision

What should keep the country alive

What contradictions need to be maintained

How the signal turns into a confirmed result

Signal → Balance → solution → Program → Project → Verification → adjustment

4 / 16

Solutions 1–7: Strategic Core

STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

P-01

Doctrine of Victory

P-05

Unified registries

A single subject of strategic management.

Related IDs, Versions, and Access Rights.

P-02

Balance system

P-06

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

A profile of goals, resources, risks and consequences.

Early warning based on independent sources.

P-03

Analytical Center

Summary of the situation and solutions.

P-07

Unified technologies

Maturity only after confirmation.

P-04

EQUILIBRIUM OS

Trackable cycle from goal to result.

5 / 16

Solutions 8–13: Evidence and Resource

STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

P-08

National validation system

P-11

SPECZASHCHITA

Separation of the developer, operator, and checker.

Cooperative execution, pilots and scaling.

P-09

SFERA initiatives

P-12

Technological Sovereignty

Unified route of social, scientific and business initiatives.

Linking critical technologies, capacities and demand.

P-10

ECO-PPA

P-13

Energy sustainability

Program and project agreements of preventive action.

Reservation, autonomy and safe switching.

6 / 16

Solutions 14–19: Industries and Sustainability

STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

P-14

Biotic communities

P-17

Human development

Water, air, land and food as a single system.

Health, education, employment and civic preparedness.

P-15

Transport and logistics

P-18

Heritage archive

Backup routes and supply continuity.

Rights, origin, storage and digital copies.

P-16

Science and education

P-19

Strategic stability

Register of institutions, equipment and competencies.

Secure international cooperation without hidden obligations.

7 / 16

Four ways to turn an idea into a result

MECHANISMS OF EXECUTIVE

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

surveillance

forecast

control

Initiatives

Co-operation

feedback

resources

Agreement

Responsibility

Consortiums

Production

Scaling

The state contour sets requirements and makes decisions. Architecture provides data, evidence, and execution — without transferring power to it.

8 / 16

Balances 1–10: targets, threats, resources

STRATEGIC BALANCES

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

B-01

Objectives — resources

B-06

Safety - economic efficiency

B-02

Threats — Readiness

B-07

Need - production capacity

B-03

Current Sustainability — Long-Term Development

B-08

Funding — Physical Preparedness

B-04

Warning - Response - Recovery

B-09

Innovation — reliability

B-05

Sovereign control - international cooperation

B-10

Scientific - technological - production maturity

A high score in one area does not have the right to hide a critical failure in another.

9 / 16

Balances 11–19: stability of performance

STRATEGIC BALANCES

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

B-11

Human Capital - Automation

B-16

Speed of decision — quality — legality

B-12

Centralization - territorial independence

B-17

Concentration — Distributed Sustainability

B-13

Infrastructure load — sustainability reserve

B-18

Operational effectiveness — social acceptability

B-14

Resource consumption — replenishment

B-19

Environmental stress - regenerative capacity

B-15

Data Utility — Information Security

The civilian effect does not compensate for the red level of defense readiness - and vice versa.

10 / 16

Decision is allowed only after calculation

CALCULATION AND APPROACH

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

Bⱼ = 100 × Qⱼ × Π max(zⱼₖ, 0,01)^αⱼₖ

I = 100 × Π [Bⱼ(robust) / 100]^wⱼ

Evidence

Q reduces score with weak database

Stress scenario

Robust picks the worst out of a basic and stressful state

Critical veto

One red limit prohibits the green final index

11 / 16

Scaling requires evidence

PROOF

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

D-0 Assumption → D-1 Expert assessment → D-2 Data → D-3 independent verification → D-4 Audit

GREEN

YELLOW

RED

I ≥ 75

critical balances ≥ 65

Q ≥ 0,80

55 ≤ I < 75

Q = 0,60–0,79

Risk at the Limit

I < 55

critical balance < 45

Q < 0,60

Controlled Scaling

Only a limited pilot

Stopping or processing

For the pilot, the critical KPI is not lower than D-2. For scaling - not lower than D-3.

12 / 16

Two pilots test the methodology

PILOT

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

CIVIL CONTOUR

PROTECTED CONTOUR

Object

One area with natural, infrastructural and socio-economic risk

Verification

Early warning, continuity of function, resource mobilization, public feedback

Object

One departmental or dual-use process

Verification

Readiness requirements, secure analytics, aggregated interface, no data leakage

Both pilots are limited, reversible, auditable, and have predefined stop conditions.

13 / 16

The first 100 days create a closed loop

FIRST 100 DAYS

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

1. Designate a responsible unit and expert group

6. Create passports of threats, decisions and balances

2. Conduct legal, scientific and information security expertise

7. Create a demo panel without private data

3. Approve pilot boundaries and access modes

8. Prepare TK, Feasibility Study and Life Cycle Model

4. Fix baselines and stop criteria

9. Conduct scenario training and independent audit

5. Inventory of systems, data and power

10. Present a solution: continue, adjust or stop

14 / 16

Scaling - only through the stage gate

ROAD MAP

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

0–3 months

PREPROJECT

mandate, boundaries, legal model, baselines and TK

3–6 months

DEMONSTRATOR

registries, balance sheet, scenarios and evidence protocol

6–12 months

PILOTS

two pilots, measurement and independent verification

12–36 months

INTER-AGENCY MASKTAB

interfaces, territories, industries and validation centers

36–60 months

INSTITUTIONALization

regular procedures, personnel, stress tests and state cycle

15 / 16

Requested work route, not status

PROPOSED SOLUTION

MATERIALS FOR EXPERT CONSIDERATION

Identify a profile unit for preliminary study of materials

Conduct interdisciplinary assessment: defense sustainability, technology, economics and law

Consider a temporary expert group without forming a new management body

Define civilian and protected pilots with indicators, limits and stop conditions

At this stage, it is proposed to test the methodology - not to approve the Doctrine and not to commit to scaling.

16 / 16

Sources cited in presentation 23

  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Victory Doctrine and Strategic Balances, version 1.0 of 26.08.2026.
  • Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 14.05.2024: https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50555
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. The Victory Doctrine, Annex 1, Sections 1–4.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. The Doctrine of Victory, Annex 1, sections 2, 9 and 11.
  • Federal Law No. 28.12.2010 of 390-FZ: https://special.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/32417
  • Federal Law No. 28.06.2014 of 172-FZ: https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/38630
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. The Victory Doctrine, Annex 1, Sections 6–8.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Annex 2, decisions P-01-P-07.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Annex 2, decisions P-08-P-13.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Annex 2, decisions P-14-P-19.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Annex 2, Decisions of R-03, R-04, R-09, R-10 and R-11.
  • The white paper of the cooperative SPECZASHCHITA, version 1.0 from 18.08.2026.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Annex 3, B - Balances01—B-10.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Annex 3, balances B-11B-19 and section 11.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Annex 3, sections 3–5.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Annex 3, sections 7–8.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Annex 4, section 1.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Annex 4, section 2.
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov. Annex 4, section 3.
  • Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 07.05.2024 № 309: https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202405070015
  • Letter from A. R. Belousov, section "Please consider" and annex 4, section 6.
  • Meeting of the President of the Russian Federation with the commanders of the military districts, 15.05.2024: https://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/74030
  • Meeting of the President of the Russian Federation with the leadership of the Ministry of Defense, 05.08.2026: https://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/80427

Published files

Management · Full published text

Ideal Document Flow in SUR

Source Status: Primary Document

A model of the flow of documents, decisions and responsibility within the development management system.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/idealnyi-dokumentooborot-sur

Open on the site

DOCUMENT → DECISION → EXECUTION → RESULTS → MEMORY

The architecture of transition from files, folders and approvals to a single life cycle of powers, versions, electronic signatures, execution and proof of result

Integration: SUR • KRISTALL741 • EQUILIBRIUM • SFERA • ECO-PPA • SUR-810 • ESG-IR 1.0

Author: Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov

Version 1.0 | 27 August 2026

STATUS

Passport Concept

ParameterValue
ObjectFull life cycle of management documents and related evidence
GoalOne-time creation of a reliable document and its repeated legal use without loss of context
Control unitAuthoritative record: content + Metadata + Authority + Version + Signature + Communications + status + storage life
ArchitectureFederated: the original is kept by the authorized owner; SES links identifiers, statuses and evidence
ResultFrom the decision you can go to the base, performer, resource, fact of execution, result and archival fate
BorderThe system does not replace the powers of authorities, secrecy regimes, official archives and owners of state information systems.

MAIN

Summary for decision

Modern workflow often optimizes file transfer, but does not eliminate the gap between the content of the document, the author’s authority, version, approval, management decision, execution and proven result. As a result, a digital file exists, and a single decision history is split between mail, folders, departmental systems and reports.

The target model considers the document as an active control object. It has an immutable identifier, metadata passport, owner, status, route, timeline, access rights, digital signatures, links to other documents, and event logs. The approved version becomes an authoritative record, not another copy of the file.

In SUR, the document is linked to the KRISTALL741 balance management system, the indicators of Catalogue 260, EQUILIBRIUM analytics, ECO-PPA project execution, the SUR-810 settlement trail and ESG-IR 1.0 validation. This forms a continuous chain from a signal to archival memory and the reuse of knowledge.

DECISION

Proposed management solution

  1. To approve the development of a target model of the ideal document flow as an outline of the Development Management System.
  2. Determine the state or corporate process of the pilot, the owner of the result and the list of participating information systems.
  3. Approve a single document passport, ID, classifier, status model and mandatory event log.
  4. Ensure legally significant signing through acceptable types of electronic signature and trusted infrastructure.
  5. Exclude creation of parallel originals: one authoritative record, controlled submissions and verifiable copies.
  6. Link the document to the decision, order, project, resource, execution, result indicator and storage period.
  7. Following the results of the pilot, submit regulatory, organizational, information, archival and economic assessments.

DEFINITION

What is the ideal document flow

The ideal workflow is a system for creating, registering, using, executing, proving, storing and legally destroying documents, in which the authenticity, authenticity, integrity, usability and context of each record are preserved.

PropertyPractical meaning
AuthenticityYou can prove the origin of the document, author, authority and method of signing
CredibilityThe content correctly reflects the operation, decision or event
IntegrityUnauthorized change detected, versions distinguishable
SuitabilityThe document can be found, opened, understood and used in an acceptable process
ContextRelations with the case, participants, grounds, decisions and events are maintained
TraceabilitySeen full story from creation to execution and archival destiny

DIAGNOSIS

Why the usual electronic document flow is insufficient

  • files are duplicated in mail, messengers, network folders and several EDMS;
  • the file name is used instead of a stable ID and passport;
  • approval captures the opinion, but does not always check the authority, data and risks;
  • the approved version is separated from the order, resource and actual execution;
  • event report replaces the proof of change in the result;
  • the storage period is determined late or is not associated with the class of the document;
  • when changing the system, the context, the log of actions and legal evidence are lost;
  • The search returns the documents, but does not explain which one is valid and why.

ARCHITECTURE

The Ten Principles of the System

PrincipleRule
One originalFor each legally significant state, one authoritative record is determined.
Default ContextDocument does not exist without cause, process, owner, reason and purpose
Authority before signatureChecks not only the certificate, but also the right of the person to make a specific decision
Version as eventEach change creates a new version with a base and author
EventivityThe route is described by an event log, not by moving copies
FederalityData remains with the owners; intersystem exchange is on standard passports
Minimizing accessAccess is issued by role, purpose, information class, phase and deadline
EvidenceExecution ends with confirmation of the result, not a change of status
Archive since creationTerm and archival fate are appointed at registration
ReversibilityCritical actions have stop conditions, rollback and standby mode

ARCHITECTURE

Seven Layers of Target Architecture

LayerPurposeResult
1. NormativePowers, regulations, standards, terms of storageLegal model of the document
2. SemanticClassifiers, ontology, 741, catalog 260Common language and address
3. DocumentalContents, props, versions, presentationsAuthoritative record
4. ProcessRoutes, roles, timelines, escalations, assignmentsControlled movement
5. TrustedIdentification, credentials, EP, time stampsProved will
6. EvidentiaryRelationship of decision, resource, execution and resultFull file
7. Archival and analyticalStorage, value examination, search, re-knowledgeInstitutional memory

LIFE CYCLE

Thirteen phases of the life cycle

CodePhaseBenchmark
D01NeedA task, event, or reason is recorded
D02ClassificationDetermine the type, case, mode, template and shelf life
D03Data collectionVerified sources and previous solutions are connected
D04PreparationA draft and passport of the document is created
D05Factual verificationCheck data, formulas, references and completeness
D06Law and safetyRules, powers, access and risks are checked
D07HarmonizationPositions, comments and resolution of disagreements are recorded
D08Approval and signatureThe expression of will is associated with a specific version
D09RegistrationAssign number, date, status and authoritative storage
D10AdvertiseRecipients receive a verifiable submission and commitment
D11ImplementationThe document is associated with actions, resources and deadlines
D12Acceptance and ValidationConfirmed performance and measurable result
D13Archive, destruction, re-knowledgeThe fate of the recording is completed and the applicable knowledge is retained

LIFE CYCLE

Document Status Model

The status of the document is determined by the event and a set of fulfilled conditions. The user should not manually select the status if the system can deduce it from signatures, route and execution facts.

StateEntry conditionAllowed output
ProjectPassport and first version createdTo check or close
Under reviewAuditing and control issues are assignedFor finalization or approval
In agreementFacts, Law and Security PassedTo sign or resolve a dispute
ApprovedSignature valid, authorization confirmedFor registration
In effectRegistration completed and due to expireFor execution, modification or cancellation
ExecutedObligatory actions completedOn reception
VerifiedResults accepted and validatedTo archive or new cycle
Replaced / CancelledThere is a new decision or act of cancellationTo archive
ArchivalFinished office work, assigned storage modeValuation / Destruction

CLASSIFICATION

Document classes and control modes

ClassExamplesFeature
StrategicStrategy, doctrine, concept, programLong horizon and inter-documentary links
NormativeRegulation, regulation, standard, methodologyMonitoring relevance and scope
ManagingDecision, order, order, orderAuthority, addressees, time frame and control
ProjectPassport, plan, assignment, protocol, actLinkage to stage, resource and result
ContractualContract, agreement, additional agreementCommitments, counterparties, versions and signatures
FinancialEstimate, limit, account, payment basisAccounting, control and communication with SUR-810
Science and technologyReport, calculation, model, drawing, data setReproducibility and origin
EvidentiaryAcceptance certificate, test report, photo, measurementIndependence, time and reference to the criterion
CorrespondenceLetter, request, reply, appealRoute, timing and connection to the case
Archival complexesCase, Inventory, Electronic ContainerIntegrity of the composition and long-term preservation

CLASSIFICATION

Single ID and document address

ElementValue
SUR-DOCObject class — SUR document
B16Financial and investment balance management system
L10The resource and calculation model phase of KRISTALL741
S1Federal scale
2026Year of primary registration
000001Invariant ordinal identifier
V03Third version of content

The identifier does not replace the registration number of a particular system. It serves as the end-to-end address for communication between documentary, project, financial, analytical and archival contours.

METADAN

Universal Document Passport

The passport connects the content of the document with its context, authority, versions, execution and archival fate.

GroupRequired fields
IdentificationCode, name, type, language, format, date of creation
ContextProcess, business, balance system, phase, scale, project
ResponsibilityAuthor, content owner, result owner, operator
RightBasis, authority, applicable rules, regime of information
VersionNumber, reason for change, author of change, date, status
HarmonizationRoute, participants, positions, comments, resolution of disagreements
Authorized officerEP view, certificate, time, inspection result, power
ConnectionsParent, applications, replaceable documents, decisions, instructions
ImplementationAddressee, action, time, resource, reference point
EvidenceActs, measurements, sources, validator, result
AccessClass, Roles, Purpose, Term, Copy Limitations
ArchiveNomenclature of the case, shelf life, countdown event, fate

GOVERNANCE

Powers and roles

RoleResponsibilityCan't.
InitiatorFormulates the need and expected resultIndependently approve outside the authority
AuthorCreates content and confirms sourcesHide the origin of borrowed data
Owner of ContentResponsible for relevance and correctnessDelete Version History
Lawyer / ComplianceChecks rights, risks and restrictionsSubstitute the owner of the management decision
AgreeingFixes position within competenceAgree for another participant
ApprovingMakes a decision and signs a specific versionDelegate signature without legal basis
RegistrarAssigns a number and records an authoritative recordChange the approved content
Person carrying out the workPerforms action and applies evidenceIndependently accept your own result
ValidatorIndependently checks the resultModifying Primary Evidence
ArchivistManages the case, time and archival fateExterminate outside of approved procedure

GOVERNANCE

Consent without loss of responsibility

The ideal route does not seek to obtain the maximum number of visas. It includes only those participants whose competence is necessary for the quality and legality of the decision.

  1. The system defines mandatory checks by type of document, risk and information mode.
  2. Each conciliator receives a list of questions of their competence, rather than a general request to “agree”.
  3. The comment contains the norm, the risk, the proposal of change and the degree of criticality.
  4. Parallel agreements are carried out simultaneously; dependent ones - only after the completion of the necessary predecessor.
  5. Disagreement is not hidden by a new copy: a formal decision on position and basis is created.
  6. The expired deadline causes an escalation to the process owner, but does not mean automatic consent for critical documents.

TRUST

Versions, changes and cancellations

OperationMandatory fixationResult
Black changeAuthor, time, modified fragmentsNew working version
Substantial revisionBase, comparative report, rechecksA new agreed version
Bug FixError description, influence, decision makerFixed version with original version
ExtensionLegal basis and new dateNew version of validity period
ReplacementLink to new document and termination dateThe previous document receives the status of "replaced"
CancelCancellation Act, grounds, date and consequencesStatus "cancelled", content saved

TRUST

Electronic signature and trusted time

The choice of the type of electronic signature is determined by law, the agreement of the participants and the risk of the operation. For each route, a valid type of signature, method of identification, certificate verification, credentials and trusted time are specified in advance.

MonitoringQuestion to be checked
IdentityWho owns the key and was the certificate valid at the time of signing?
CredentialsDid the person have the right to sign exactly this type of document and the amount/perimeter?
VersionWhat exact set of bytes and applications were signed?
TimeWhen did the signing take place and what source confirmed the time?
IntegrityDid the document change after signing?
Long-term verificationAre the data required to verify the signature after the certificate expires?
IntroductionDoes the visual form match the signed content and structured data?

PROOF

Origin Metadata and Event Log

Metadata should tell the story of the document: who, what, when, why, and on what basis did it with a specific digital object. The journal stores events, not just the last values of fields.

EventMinimum composition
EstablishmentAuthor, source, template, original version, time
ChangePrevious version, new version, differences, base
View / UnloadSubject, role, purpose, object, time, channel
HarmonizationPosition, competence, comment, signature, time
ApprovalPerson, power, version, signature, trusted time
RegistrationNumber, system, registrar, authoritative repository
ImplementationAction, executor, resource, deadline, proof
VerificationMethod, validator, result, limitations
Archival ActionCase, term, value examination, transfer or destruction

PROOF

End-to-end evidence chain

  • each relationship has a type, author, time, reason and direction;
  • loss of mandatory communication creates a quality signal and can block the route;
  • the proof cannot be considered a result without the acceptance criterion and validator;
  • the archive record saves not only the file, but also the necessary verification context;
  • The search does not show a list of similar documents, but an existing authoritative chain.

SUR INTEGRATION

A document in KRISTALL741

Each management document receives an address of the balance system, phase and scale. This allows you to understand not only the theme of the file, but also its function in a closed control loop.

CodeDocument FunctionExample
B01–B19Balance Management SystemB12 - water balance
L01–L13Management cycle phaseL09 - Legal Expertise and Security
S1–S3ScaleS2 - Regional / Interregional
DOCObject classDocument, application, proof, data set
VxxVersionV04 - The fourth substantial version

SUR INTEGRATION

Roles of the ecosystem

ComponentDocument roleWithdrawal
EQUILIBRIUMSources, models, scenarios and analytical findingsVerifiable basis of the decision
GASMPObservation events and early signalsPrimary Signal with Origin
SFERARegistration of initiatives and public feedbackInitiative card and route
KRISTALL741Classification of the document by system, phase and scaleCross address
ECO-PPAPassports, agreements and resource commitmentsExecutable project package
SPECZASHCHITAExecutive documents and primary evidenceFact of action
SUR-810Relationship of the document with the obligation and the ruble settlement eventCalculated footprint
ESG-IR 1.0Methodology, acceptance and independent validationConfirmed result

INFORMATION MODEL

Minimum set of registers

RegisterKey objects
DocumentsIdentifier, type, version, status, owner, storage
Cases and processesProcess, case, stage, relationships, timing
Participants and credentialsPerson, organization, role, power of attorney, limit
Classifiers741, 260, types of documents, modes, nomenclature of cases
RoutesChecks, approvals, signatures, escalation
Decisions and instructionsDecision, addressee, action, deadline, control
Projects and resourcesProject, commitment, limit, settlement status
EvidenceSource, method, criterion, result, validator
EventsAction, Subject, Object, Time, Basis, Result
Archival fateTerm, countdown event, examination, transfer, destruction

INFORMATION MODEL

Formats, Compatibility and Migration

  • Content and metadata are shared separately but linked by a single identifier.
  • structured data is stored together with human-readable representation;
  • the exchange format includes the versions of the scheme, mandatory fields and verification rules;
  • Migration confirms the number of objects, checks, connections and results of the check;
  • long-term storage does not depend on a single application software product;
  • each integration has an owner, SLA, backup mode and error handling protocol;
  • The replacement of the information system should not change the identifier and legal history of the document.

SAFETY

Access, protection and minimization

The decision on access is formed by five dimensions: the role of the subject, the business purpose, the information class, the process phase and the allowable period. The fact of access does not mean the right to copy, distribute or modify.

MonitoringRequirement
IdentificationConfirmed account and multi-factor authentication
AuthorizationMinimum authority over role and case
SegmentationSeparation of open, service, confidential and special contours
CopyControl of discharge, marking of submissions and watermarks as necessary
EncryptionProtection during transfer and storage by information class
JournalingUnchangeable access trail and critical actions
ReviewAutomatic termination of access when changing role, case or term
ResponseSignals, isolation, investigation, recovery and notifications

SAFETY

Personal data, privacy and critical infrastructure

CategoryProject requirement
Personal dataLegal basis, minimization, purpose of processing, localization when applicable, deadline and deletion
A trade secretList of information, regime, marking, accounting of persons and contractual obligations
Official informationDepartmental rules, restriction of distribution and registration of extradition
State secretsSeparate protected contour and compliance with the established mode
KIICategorization, safety requirements and interaction with the competent authorities, if applicable
Archival documentsMaintain access restrictions along with document and metadata

ARCHIVE

Archival fate begins at registration

  1. When classifying a document, it receives the position of the case nomenclature and a preliminary storage period.
  2. The system records the event from which the term is calculated: completion of the case, termination of the contract, dismissal, replacement of the document or other grounds.
  3. The document is bundled with metadata, signatures, applications, and the necessary verification context.
  4. At the end of the process, an electronic case is formed with the control of completeness and integrity.
  5. The value examination determines permanent, long-term, temporary storage or destruction.
  6. Destruction is performed by act, after expiration of deadlines and removal of locks, with the event log.
  7. Knowledge that is no longer valid can be reused only with an explicit label of status and origin.

AUTOMATION

Artificial Intelligence in Document Management

AIAI should not be on its own
classify the document and propose a routeMaking a legally significant decision
extract details and check completenessSigning for an Authorized Person
find contradictions, duplicates and outdated linkshide uncertainty or source of output
compare versions and summarize commentsModify the approved version
propose related documents and precedentsExpand access to private data
control timing and generate early signalsAutomatically close critical order
prepare a draft dossier and archival inventorydetermine the archival fate without an authorized procedure

AUTOMATION

Automatic Routing Rules

SignalAutomatic action
No required propsReturn to author before start of approval
Invalid or outdated linkPrevention and appointment of factual verification
No confirmed authoritySignature Blocking
Changed content after approvalCancellation of dependent approvals
Critical disagreementTransfer to the owner of the process; prohibition of automatic approval
Expiration dateEscalation to the owner of the result and fixation of the deviation
The proof is not related to the criterionProhibition of closure of the order
Expires on storageStart examination; not automatic destruction
Infringed integritySite isolation and security incident

MEASUREMENT

Indicators of ideal document flow

[M] values are model pilot targets, not government regulations. After two months of observation, they are specified on the basis of the baseline.

IndicatorModel thresholdMeaning
Authoritative record is defined100%No competing originals
Completeness of mandatory metadata≥99,5% [M]Document can be understood and verified
Confirmed powers of signatories100%Barrier to legal significance
Agreement without sending copies≥95% [M]Working with one version
End-to-end solution - result≥99% [M]Full evidentiary file
Search for the current version, P95≤30 seconds [M]Fast availability of knowledge
Formation of a complete dossier, P95≤15 Minutes [M]Readiness for control
Overdue critical orders0Stop-indicator
Unauthorized changes0Stop-indicator of integrity
Documents without archival fate0Managed Storage

IMPLEMENTING

Pilot: 30 / 100 / 365 days

TimeframeWorksGateway Result
0–30 daysProcess selection; map of systems; inventory of documents, credentials, signatures, archival requirementsBorders, owner and base line approved
31–100 daysSingle passport, ID, classifier, statuses, route, access model, prototypeGo / revise / stop for a working pilot
101–180 daysShadow mode: parallel comparison with the current process without changing the legal contourCompleteness and correctness confirmed
181–300 daysLimited working mode, trusted signature, execution register, evidenceStop conditions and KPI are met
301–365 daysArchival completion, stress test, recovery, independent evaluation and scaling packageDecision on termination, revision or scale

IMPLEMENTING

Road map to 2030

StageFocusResult
2026Methodology and legal modelPassport, classifier, rules of trust and pilot regulations
2027Limited pilotVerified chain of document, execution and archive
2028Intersystem compatibilityFederal Registers, API, common event dictionary
2029Scaling to portfoliosStandard routes for strategic and project documents
2030Managed Document Environment for SDSCross-linking goals, decisions, resources, results and memory

RISKS

Key risks and measures

RiskManifestationMeasure
Parallel originalsSome "final" versionsAuthoritative record and register of submissions
Formal digitalizationScan Instead of Managed RecordingPassport, Events and Structured Data
Signature without credentialsCertificate valid, decision invalidAutomatic role and limit testing
Excess approvalsDeceleration without quality gainMatrix of mandatory competencies
LeakageA single search reveals private informationFederal index and minimization of extradition
AI-hallucinationIncorrect fact or referenceOrigin, confidence and human verification
Dependence on supplierInability to migrateOpen export schemes and regular testing
The Archive GapSignature or format not verified years laterLong-term Validation and Migration
Substitution of resultStatus "executed" without effectAcceptance criteria and independent validation

DRAFT DECISION

Draft instruction

Proposed wording for further legal development:

  1. Prepare proposals for the creation of a pilot outline of the ideal document flow as part of the Development Management System of the Russian Federation.
  2. Determine the owner of the result, operator, pilot object, participating bodies and information systems.
  3. Within a period of up to 100 days, develop a single document passport, identifier, classifier, status model, event log and archive fate rules.
  4. Ensure the use of electronic signature, verification of authority, integrity and trusted time in accordance with applicable requirements.
  5. Establish the principle of one authoritative record and prohibit the uncontrolled formation of parallel originals.
  6. Link the pilot’s documents with decisions, instructions, resources, execution, evidence, and measurable results.
  7. Conduct an independent legal, informational, archival and cybernetic assessment.
  8. Following the results of 12 months to submit proposals for the termination, revision or scaling of the model.

PLAN OF ACTION

The first 100 days: ten results

ResultAcceptance criterion
Mandate and boundariesThere is a customer, the owner of the result, the process and the list of systems
Map of current statusFixed documents, copies, routes, deadlines and problems
Legal modelQualified documents, signatures, data and archival requirements
ClassifierDefined types, 741-address, modes and nomenclature of cases
Passport documentMandatory metadata and quality rules approved
Status modelEvery transition has an event, conditions, role and prohibition
Trusted routeVerify version, signature, authority and time
Evidence-based modelThe document is related to the order, resource, action and result
Archival modelAppointed date, countdown event, case and completion procedure
Prototype and GatewayShown end-to-end script and decided go / revise / stop

CONCLUSION

Final position

The ideal workflow transforms a document from a file and an administrative footprint into a manageable medium of authority, decision, action, and institutional memory. It does not start with the purchase of a new EDMS: it begins with a single model of authoritative record, responsibility, metadata, events, and evidence.

In the SUR architecture, each document is assigned a place in one of the 19 balance management systems, a life-cycle phase and a scale of KRISTALL741. Catalogue 260 sets measurable requirements; EQUILIBRIUM provides the analytical basis; ECO-PPA, the project commitment; SUR-810, the settlement trail; and ESG-IR 1.0, validation of the result.

The ideal document doesn’t just exist. He explains who created him and why, what he changed, how he was executed, and what result he left behind.

ANNEX A

Official sources and standards

1. GOST R 7.0.97-2025 - requirements for the preparation of organizational and administrative documents

2. GOST R ISO 15489-1-2019 - document management: concepts and principles

3. GOST R 7.0.101-2018 / ISO 30301 — document management systems: requirements

4. GOST R ISO 30302-2022 — Guide for the implementation of the document management system

5. ISO 23081-1-2008 - metadata for documents

6. Federal Law No. 63-FZ "On Electronic Signature"

7. Federal Law No. 149-FZ "On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection"

8. Federal Law No. 152-FZ "On Personal Data"

9. Federal Law No. 125-FZ "On Archival Affairs in the Russian Federation"

10. Federal Law No. 187-FZ "On the Security of Critical Information Infrastructure of the Russian Federation"

11. Order of Rosarchiv No236 — list of standard management archival documents and storage periods

12. ISO 23081 — metadata for records

ANNEX B

Glossary

TermDefinition
Authoritative recordDocument, which is given the status of an official and controlled copy by the established rules
DocumentInformation and related context created or received as evidence and business asset
IntroductionA human-readable or machine form of authoritative writing that does not create a new original
Passport documentStructured Metadata Set Required for Management and Verification
EventThe recorded action of a subject or system over a particular object
VersionCondition of detention resulting from controlled change
CredentialsConfirmed right of a person to perform a specific action within the specified limits
Trusted timeEvent time confirmed by an acceptable source and suitable for verification
Electronic caseA set of interrelated documents, metadata, and events of a single process or issue
Archival fateThe established term and procedure for storing, transferring or destroying the record
Evidentiary dossierLinked set of grounds, decisions, execution, resources and confirmation of the result

ANNEX C

Methodological reservations

  • The concept describes the target model and does not replace the survey of a specific process and information systems.
  • The term “perfect” refers to the completeness of the management cycle, not the absence of errors or absolute automation.
  • The unified architecture is compatible with federated storage and does not require the centralization of restricted access documents.
  • The electronic signature is applied only in the permissible legal and contractual regime.
  • AI supports classification, search and control, but does not replace authority and legal liability.
  • Model KPI [M] are specified after the baseline and are not normative or promise effect.
  • Storage periods and archival fate are determined according to the current lists, nomenclature of cases and expertise of value.
  • Scaling is allowed after independent verification of the right, security, portability, archival integrity and actual result.

End of document

Other published edition: IDEAL DOCUMENT_Document_Flow_SUR.pptx · web text +

National system of managed documents and evidence

AUTHORITY

RECORDS

DOCUMENT → DECISION → EXECUTION → RESULTS → MEMORY

Unified life cycle of powers, versions, electronic signatures, execution and evidence of the result

Author: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich | version 1.0 | 27 August 2026

Not “without paper”, but without a break in responsibility

DECISION

Normal electronic circulation

The ideal document flow

Moves files, records visas, and stores copies. But context, authority, version, execution, and archival destiny often live apart.

Manages the authoritative record: who and on what basis created, approved, performed, checked and saved the result.

Solution: to design the outline of the managed documents and evidence of the SDS

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The file moves — the management sense is broken

DIAGNOSIS

COPY

FILE NAME

VISA

REPORTS

Mail • Messengers • Folders

Instead of a sustainable address

without verification of authority

Instead of proof of result

When a system changes, connections, event logs, and legally relevant context are lost.

Targeted transition: from sending files to managing responsible records

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The formula of authoritative record

DEFINITION

Contents

Context

Credentials

Version

Authorized officer

Connections

Status

Archive

Evidence

Document = Contents + context + Authority + Version + Signature + Communications + status + storage life + evidence

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

One original - multiple controlled performances

TRUST

Work

Editable form

You can't

AUTHORITY

RECORDS

create multiple independent "final" files without a common address and history

Signed

Unchanged version

Printable

visual representation

Machine

The new version does not erase the old one - it becomes its proven successor.

Structured data

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Thirteen Phases - One Closed Circuit

LIFE CYCLE

D01

D02

D03

D04

D05

D06

D07

Need

Classification

Data collection

Preparation

Fact check

Law and protection

Harmonization

D08

D09

D10

D11

D12

D13

Authorized officer

Registration

Advertise

Implementation

Acceptance

Archive / Knowledge

Result D12 and knowledge D13 become input for new need D01

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Status is determined by the event, not the folder name

STATE

Project

Verified

Agreed

Approved

In effect

Executed

Verified

Archival

Created a passport

verified facts

Allowed Positions

signed version

delivered to the addressees

there is evidence

result validated

Fate is appointed

You cannot delete or rewrite the approved version: only replace it with the same base

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Passport turns a file into a manageable document

METADAN

IDENTIFICATION

CONTACTS

RESPONSIBILITY

LAW

code • type • format • date

Process • Balance • Phase • Project

Author • Owner • Operator

Base • Power • Mode

VERSION AND SIGNATURES

LINKS

EXECUTION

ACCESS AND ARCHIVES

Change • certificate • time

Solution • Order • Application

address • term • resource • result

Role • Term • Destiny

Minimum: without a passport, the file remains an information object, but not an authoritative record

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

A single identifier connects all contours

ADDRESS

SUR-DOC-B16-L10-S1-2026-000001-V03

SUR-DOC

B16

L10

2026

000001

V03

Class

Balance

phase 741

scale

Year

Room

Version

The identifier does not replace the EDMS number - it creates a through address between systems

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The right to be checked before signing

CREDENTIALS

Identity

Role

Basis

Who is acting

In what capacity

Why he has the right

Limit

Version

Time

What decisions are acceptable

What exactly is signed

When and for how long

A valid electronic signature does not correct a lack of authority or a false document

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Examination is distributed - approval personally

Alignment

FACT

LAW

SAFETY

FINANCE

Sources • calculations

norm • power

mode • access

Resource • Commitment

CONFIRMING

Decide on a specific version

The disagreement is fixed and allowed - a new copy does not hide it

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The event magazine explains the history of the document

ORIGIN

Created by

CHANGES

VERIFIED

SIGNED

PERFORMED

ARCHIVED

Author • source

Version • Base

Control • result

certificate • time

Action • Resource

term • fate

Minimum Event Composition

Who • What • When • Why • On what basis • with which version • What result

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The document links the decision with the result

PROOF

Basis

Data

Project

Expertise

Credentials

Authorized officer

The Commission

Resource

Implementation

Acceptance

Result

Archive

The control question is: is it possible to restore the complete dossier of the solution in 15 minutes?

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Seven Layers - Uniform Rules Without a Single Monolithic Base

ARCHITECTURE

NORMATIVE

Authority • Standards

SEMANTIC

Classifiers • ontology

DOCUMENTARY

Content •

PROCESS

Routes •

TRUSTED

identity • signature

EXPLANATORY

performance • result

ARCHIVE

term • fate

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

KRISTALL741 defines the address — the document proves the action

SUR INTEGRATION

19 BALANCES

CATALOGUE 260

what is managed

What type and rule

CONTROLLED

DOCUMENT

KRISTALL741

SUR-810

Where and in what phase

What a calculated trail.

EQUILIBRIUM Confirms the balance • ESG-IR 1.0 Confirms the result

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Minimum set of general information

REGISTERS

Documents

Cases and processes

Participants

Classifiers

ID • status

Context • Term

Roles •

741 • 260 • types

Routes

Events

Evidence

Archival fate

• Approval

who • that • when

source • validator

Term • Destruction

Integration is based on a common data contract, not the same software

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Access is defined by role, purpose and time

PROTECTION

IDENTITY

AUTHORIZATION

SEGMENTATION

Confirmed Subject

Role and Authority

contour and class

WRITING

JOURNAL

RESPONSE

during transfer and storage

Invariable footprint

Isolation and Recovery

A single search does not mean a single view: the result is disclosed only within the legitimate purpose

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Archival fate begins at registration

ARCHIVE

Case • List • Mode • Provisional

Classification

Case completion • contract termination • record replacement

Countdown Event

Metadata • Signatures • Application • Version

Completeness control

Permanent • Long • Temporary Storage

Examination of value

Transfer • re-knowledge • act of destruction

Fulfillment of destiny

The archive is not a warehouse: it provides long-term provability and controlled reuse

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

AI Helps — the person saves the decision

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

AI

AI can not independently

Classify • retrieve details • look up contradictions • compare versions • offer route • prepare draft response

Sign • Approve • Change the source • Hiding the risk • Destroy the document • Making a legally significant decision

Each recommendation AI stores the model, version, input, time, confidence and decision of the person

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

30 / 100 / 365 days

PILOT

One complete interdepartmental process with solution, resource, execution and archive

0–30

101–180

301–365

DESIGN

PARALLEL MODE

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION

Process • Right • Role • Base Line

comparison • quality • load

stop • finish • scale

31–100

181–300

WORKING CONTOUR

EXPANSION

passport • statuses • signature • API

documents • proof • archive

The first scale is to prove the full cycle, not to connect the maximum number of users

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

KPI Test manageability, not activity

MEASUREMENT

100%

100%

Authoritative record is defined

completeness of mandatory metadata

Signatories are verified

The decision is related to the result.

≤30 sec

≤15 min

search for the current version

Full Decision File

Lost evidence

Unauthorized copies

Stop conditions: violation of law, security, integrity or archival provability

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The first 100 days - ten mandatory results

DRAFT DECISION

Mandate and boundaries

Status map

Legal model

Classifier

Passport document

Status model

Trusted route

The Evidence Module

Archival model

Prototype and base line

Proposed action

Run 100- day design and 12A month-long pilot in one full interdepartmental process

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Sources cited in presentation 12

  • Author's concept "Perfect workflow", version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • [/Sources]
  • GOST R ISO 15489-1-2019 — https://protect.gost.ru/gost/details/2497916a-b91d-4248-a025-f898920fa001
  • ISO 23081 — https://committee.iso.org/sites/tc46sc11/home/projects/published/iso-23081-metadata-for-records.html
  • Federal Law No.63-FZ "On Electronic Signature" — https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102146610
  • GOST R 7.0.101-2018 / ISO 30301 — https://protect.gost.ru/gost/details/a2fe605e-7c73-428b-b519-4fa57f633907
  • GOST R ISO 30302-2022 — https://protect.gost.ru/gost/details/4bf6db6d-3ced-47f0-b982-436add643e86
  • Federal Law No152-FZ — https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102108261
  • Federal Law No187-FZ — https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/view/0001201707260023
  • Rosarchiv, order No236 — https://www.archives.gov.ru/documents/prik236_2019.shtml
  • Federal Law No125-FZ — https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102089692
  • GOST R 7.0.97-2025 — https://protect.gost.ru/gost/details/360994e3-9a70-47b9-ab3a-cf21809e26ed

Published files

State · Full published text

Ministries and the Cross-Sector Balance

Source Status: Primary Document

A model of the distribution of functions and meanings between ministries and institutions in a single intersectoral balance.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/ministerstva-i-mezhotraslevoi-balans

Open on the site

Russia • China • USA

Resource → program → industry → result → public ability

Analytical section: 2024–2026

27 August 2026

Official statistics, estimated shares and author's standardized models are shown separately. Scenario indexes are not ratings of states.

Summary for decisions

30 × 30 the Intercountry Model Core 3 Countries × 10 Sectors2,06 issue multiplier author balance 100 units55,9 → 60,0 The meaning index of the three 25% Closing the Gap4,1 p.p. break-even coordination after - negative effect
The Ministry’s money cannot be directly attributed to industry or public utility. The working bridge consists of five transitions: Office → program → product or service → industry → independent result → meaning.
  • A federal or general budget line shows the input of the resource, but not the scale of the managed production. This is especially important for Treasury, HHS, USDA, Ministry of Finance and Social Funds.
  • In the author’s inter-industry scenario, the highest physical multipliers are machines and electronics (2,45), materials and chemistry (2,36), other industry (2,31) and construction (2,28).
  • The main system bottleneck is ICT, finance, software platforms and business standards: index 100 with a lower multiplier 1,74. The information layer converts the separate power into a reproducible circuit.
  • Scientific academies, universities and laboratories should be conducted by a satellite circuit of knowledge. Publication and patent - release; implemented technology, reduced risk or open standard - the final semantic output.
  • Demonstration synchronization that closes 25% breaking to the best practice of the three, increases the average semantic index with 55,9 to 60,0: +4,1 paragraph, or +7,4% to the base. This is not a monetary estimate or an official rating.
  • Value added and damage prevented are used for monetary utility estimation; gross output cannot be summed up due to double counting of raw materials and semi-finished products.

What is Balanced

One control object should be seen in five books at once. Only such an architecture separates consumption, physical release, the state of the system, and the social outcome.

BookContentsUnitControl of double account
1. Fiscal entranceBudget allocations, transfers, taxes, purchasesRubles / Yuan / Dollars; % of GDPDo not mix the federal, general and consolidated perimeter
2. Financial balanceLoans, guarantees, funds, assets and liabilitiesstock and flow; risk; termCredit and guarantee are not equal to cost
3. Intersectoral flowGoods and services between sectors, imports, value addedZ, A, L=(I−A)⁻¹Do not add up gross output with added value
4. Physical resultMW, TW·h, t, km, beds, years of life, recovery timevolume, quality, availabilityCash performance does not prove the result
5. The Meaningful ExitSovereignty, reproduction, option, sustainability, trust, development, security, common goodIndependent KPI 0–100Don't attribute causality without an evaluation design
OVERALL FORMULA m = H · Q · (I − A)⁻¹ · G · b − r, where b is the budget impulse, G is the bridge to sectors, Q represents outcome coefficients, H is the map of meanings, and r represents risks and coordination costs.

Comparability of three states

Figure 1. The close scale of spending does not mean the same structure of the stateRU03–RU05; CN01, CN03; US01]

Issue addressedDifferenceRule
BudgetRussian Federation: Federal; PRC: general public budget; United States: federal outlaysCompare as a macro-scale, but not as a consolidated share of the state
YearCalendar 2024/2025; United States - Fiscal YearRequires FY and calendar year marking
Function / OfficeFunctional section and agency costs do not matchTreasury includes debt service; HHS transfers and insurance
PriceNational currencies and current pricesShares of GDP are acceptable; direct addition of currencies is not
Expenses/issuesTotal year OECD ICIO - 2022; national tables newerGeneral model 2022, current KPI — satellite updates
ResultRelease, Outcome, and Social Ability - Different LevelsBudget is not KPI results

Equivalent functional contours

FunctionRussiaChinaUSA
Finance and macro balanceMinistry of Finance; Treasury; FNS; FCS; Bank of Russia; RosstatMoF; PBOC; STA; GACC; NBS; NDRCTreasury; Fed; IRS; OMB; BEA; Census; BLS
Science and educationMinistry of Education; Ministry of Education; RAN; RSFMOST; MOE; CAS; NSFCNSF; NIH; NASA; DOE Science; DARPA; National Academies
Industry and tradeMinpromtorg; FRP; Rosstandart; RECMIIT; MOFCOM; SAMR; NDRCCommerce/NIST/BIS/ITA; USTR; SBA; EXIM
EnergyMinistry of Energy; Rosatom; Rostekhnadzor; SO UESNEA; NDRC; SASAC; State GridDOE; EIA; FERC; NRC; DOI
Transport and logisticsMintrans; Rosavtodor; Russian Railways; AvtodorMOT; CAAC; NRA; China RailwayDOT; FHWA; FAA; FRA; FTA; MARAD
APC and foodMinistry of Agriculture; Rosselkhoznadzor; RosrybolovstvoMARA; NFGA; SAMRUSDA; ERS; NASS; ARS; FNS; FSIS
Health and demographicsMinistry of Health; FOMS; Ministry of Labor; SFR; RospotrebnadzorNHC; NHSA; MHRSS; MCA; China CDCHHS; CMS; CDC; FDA; NIH; SSA
Defence and securityMinistry of Defence; MIA; FSB; Rosgvardia; EMERCOMCMC; MND; MPS; MEM; MSSDoD; DHS; DOJ/FBI; FEMA; Intelligence Community
EcologyMinistry of Environment; Rosprirodnadzor; REOMEE; NDRC; NEA; NFGAEPA; NOAA; DOI/USGS; DOE; FEMA
Digital managementMincifers; Roskomnadzor; GoTechCAC; MIIT; NBS; SAMROMB CIO/OIRA; GSA/TTS; CISA; NIST; NTIA

This is a functional conformity, not a statement of equal authority.

Three Numerical Signal Structure

Figure 2. R&D and defense show different modes of option creation and securityCN01, CN04; RU13; US01; WB01]

CountryPublic scaleSecurityKnowledgeBalance diagnosis
RussiaFederal expenses 40,192 trillion rub. = 19,9% GDP (2024)Defence 10,77 trillion rub. = 5,32% GDP (2024)R&D ≈0,94% GDP (WDI, 2024)Defense is the main federal absorber; bottleneck is civic diffusion of knowledge
ChinaGeneral public budget 28,7395 trillion RMB = 20,50% GDP (2025)Defence 1,7847 trillion RMB = 1,27% GDP (2025)R & D 3,9262 trillion = 2,80% GDP (2025)Public science is complemented by a large corporate and regional contour
USAFederal outlays $6,735 trillion = 23,3% GDP (FY2024)National defense $873,5 billion = 3,0% GDPR&D ≈3,45% GDP (WDI, 2023)Interest $879,9 billion are already comparable to defense; science is concentrated in DoD and HHS

Russia: Balance on functional contours

Reference scale: revised GDP for 2024 — 202.32 trillion rubles; forecast GDP for 2026 — 235.1 trillion rubles. The shares are calculated using these official baseline values.

Function and institutionsResource / budgetMeasurable outputThe Meaningful Exit
Finance: Ministry of Finance, Treasury, Federal Tax Service, FCS, Bank of Russia, Rosstat40,192 trillion Rubles of federal expenses = 19,9% GDP, 2024Inflation 9,52%; single budget and statistical contourPrice of time, predictability, trust [RU03-RU05]
Science and education: Ministry of Education, Ministry of Education, Russian Academy of Sciences, RSF589,2 billion Rubles for the state program of education, 2025; 3,2 billion on 200 New laboratories, 2024>1 600 Schools and >1 Millions of places for 2019–2024; 940 Youth LaboratoriesPersonnel, knowledge, optionality [RU06, RU07]
Industry and trade: Ministry of Industry and Trade, FRP, Rosstandart, RECSection "National Economy" 4,8 trillion rub., 2026, Wider than industryManufacturing industries +8,5% in 2024; SME export contracts 139 billion rub.Agency, technological sovereignty [RU08]
Energy: Ministry of Energy, Rosatom, SB UES, RostechnadzorDepartmental estimates do not reflect the turnover of energy companies253,535 GW of power at the beginning 2024; ≈1 198 TWT·the C Generation 2024Continuity and basic cost [RU09]
Transport: Ministry of Transport, Rosavtodor, Russian Railways, Avtodor1,874 trillion rub. cash performance, 0,93% GDP, 2024539 km of roads; 1 285 million railway passengers; quality index 105,4 with plan 105,7Connectivity and Time [RU10]
AIC: Ministry of Agriculture, Rosselkhoznadzor, Rosrybolovstvo682 billion Rubles for four state programs, 0,34% GDP, 2024Grain 125,9 mln tFood, territories, reproduction [RU11]
Health and demography: Ministry of Health, FOMS, Ministry of Labour, SFRFOMC expenditure ≈4,7 trillion rub. = 2,0% Projected GDP, 20261 222 408 Births in 2024; Medical budget does not explain demography oneHealthy Life Years and Family Trust [RU12]
Defense and security: Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Internal Affairs, FSB, Rosgvardiya, Emergencies Ministry10,77 trillion = 5,32% GDP, 2024; ≈12,9 trillion = 5,49% GDP and 29,3% Federal Spending, 2026Maintenance of combat readiness and security; civilian conversion is measured separatelyBorder and Survival [RU13]
Ecology: Ministry of Natural Resources, Rosprirodnadzor, REO477,5 billion rub. = 0,236% GDP, 2024; 522,7 billion = 0,222%, 2026Processing of MSW 54,8%; Disposal and Disposal 13,7%The suitability of the territory for life [RU14]
Digital circuit: Minzifra, Roskomnadzor, GoTechThere is no single comparable unitPossibility of broadband access in 93,7% households; actual Internet 88,5%, 2024Observing and reducing transaction costs [RU15]

The sums of different lines have different perimeters. They serve as control points and do not form an additive departmental estimate.

The contour of security dominates over direct civil development: the defense of 2026 is about 2,7 times larger than the entire section "National Economy". Scientific risk is the break "study → prototype → purchase → series".

China: Balance on functional contours

The reference year is 2025. The total public budget does not include the entire quasi-fiscal, banking, corporate and local investment contour.

Function and institutionsResource / budgetMeasurable outputThe Meaningful Exit
Finance: MoF, PBOC, NDRC, STA, GACC, NBS28,7395 trillion RMB General Public Budget = 20,50% GDP, 2025GDP 140,1879 trillion RMB; budget, credit and output are separateTrust in calculations and strategic coordination [CN01, CN03]
Science and education: MOST, MOE, CAS, NSFCEducation 4,3417 trillion; Public Science and Technology 1,2062 trillion RMBAggregate R & D 3,9262 trillion = 2,80% GDP; fundamentals 0,2778 trillionOptionality and technological update [CN01, CN03, CN05]
Industry and Trade: MIIT, MOFCOM, SAMR, NDRCThe departmental line is not equal to the industry issueIndustrial value added 41,6826 trillion; high-tech manufacturing +9,4%; commodity trade 45,4685 trillionProduction Agency and Scale [CN01]
Power: NEA, NDRC, SASAC, State GridCorporate and tariff flows more budget10 575 TWT·H generation; 3,891 TWh power; wind+Sun 1,842 TWT = 47,3% PowerContinuity and transition to net power [CN01]
Transport: MOT, CAAC, NRA, China Railway1,1977 trillion RMB budget expenditures = 0,85% GDP59,67 billion tons of cargo; 27,412 trillion t·km; ports 354,47 million TEU; 199 billion Express ShippedMarket connectivity, speed and density [CN01, CN03]
APK: MARA, NFGA, SAMR2,3495 trillion RMB for Agriculture, Forests and Water = 1,68% GDPGrain 714,88 mln tFood and territorial reproduction [CN01, CN03]
Health and social protection: NHC, NHSA, MHRSS, MCAHealth 2,1446 trillion; Employment and Social Protection 4,4416 trillion RMBInsurance covers 1,33068 billion person = 94,7%; population −3,39 million, 2025Viability and demographic contract [CN01, CN03]
Defence: CMC, MND, the Military - Industrial Outline1,784665 trillion RMB = 1,27% GDP, 2025Maintenance of defense readiness; civilian spillover is not expected automaticallySovereignty and Security [CN04]
Ecology: MEE, NDRC, NEA, NFGA581,6 billion RMB = 0,415% GDPCarbon intensity −5%; share of good air 72,6%; Class I water–III 91,4%Intergenerational fitness of the environment [CN01, CN03]
Number and data: CAC, MIIT, NBS, SAMRDivided between state and corporationsInfo/Software/IT services 7,0599 trillion RMB = 5,04% GDP; Internet 80,1%; e-commerce 46,7339 trillionSynchronization, memory and scaling [CN01]

The sums of different lines have different perimeters. They serve as control points and do not form an additive departmental estimate.

CHINA DIAGNOSIS Human Block - Education, Health, Employment and Social Protection — 10,9279 trillion RMB: 38,0% the General Public Budget and 7,8% GDP. Aggregate R & D 3,26 The State Budget is only one of the channels of knowledge.

United States: balance by functional contours

All amounts are outlays, not budget authority. FY2024/25 is a fact, FY2026 is an estimate. Diagnosis: budget primarily insures and redistributes; interest is already comparable to defense, and 79,4% federal conduct of R&D is concentrated in defense and health.

Function and institutionsResource / budgetMeasurable outputThe Meaningful Exit
Finance: Treasury, Fed, IRS, OMB; measurement BEA/Census/BLS/Treasury 1 316,9 / 1 458,9 / 1 522,7 billion $ in FY2024/25/26; Net interest 879,9 / 970,1 / 1 016,7Deficit FY2024 1 815,4 billion $; Fed Balance 7,08 trillion $ in September 2024The price of time, solvency and observability [US01, US04]
Science and education: NSF, NIH, NASA, DOE Science, DARPAFederal conduct of R&D 186,9 / 192,7 / 175,4 billion $FY2024: defense R&D 99,0; medical 49,4; NASA 11,4; DOE 10,5; NSF 6,9 billion $Optionality and specialized competences [US01]
Industry and Commerce: Commerce, NIST, BIS, USTR, SBA, EXIMCommerce 14,8 / 29,7 / 21,2 billion $; There is no single additive budgetStandards, patents, export controls; trade deficit in goods and services 903,5 billion $, 2024Autonomy without autarky and market access [US01]
Power: DOE, EIA, FERC, NRC, DOIDOE 49,3 / 52,3 / 59,6 billion $; Functionally 13,6 / 20,8 / 27,9Primary energy 103,3 quadrillion Btu, record 2024Power and Stability [US01, US05]
Transport: DOT, FHWA, FAA, FRA, FTA, MARADDOT 117,4 / 127,6 / 131,5 billion $; Functionally 136,6 / 145,3 / 150,33,294 trillion vehicle-miles in 2024Connection and speed [US01, US06]
APK and food: USDA, ERS, NASS, ARS, FNS, FSISUSDA 203,4 / 227,5 / 238,8 billion $Farm cash receipts 513,5 billion $; Agricultural exports 176,0 billion $, 2024Food and reproduction [US01]
Health and demographics: HHS, CMS, CDC, FDA, NIH, SSAHHS 1 720,6 / 1 884,3 / 2 036,0 billion $National health expenditure 5,3 trillion $ = 18,0% GDP; life expectancy 79,0 yearsLongevity and human capital [US01, US07]
Safety and Security: DoD, DHS, DOJ, FEMA, ICDoD 826,3 / 868,4 / 913,7; DHS 89,3 / 115,3 / 116,3; Defense function 873,5 / 916,1 / 966,4 billion $National defense = 3,0% GDP, FY2024Sovereignty and Continuity [US01]
Ecology: EPA, NOAA, DOE, DOI/USGS, FEMAEPA 13,7 / 37,0 / 22,3; function resources/environment 58,5 / 89,8 / 78,1 billion $Latest inventory: 6 343 million tons CO₂e gross, 2022; Net on 17% below 2005Common good and intergenerational boundary [US08]
Figure and data: OMB CIO/OIRA, GSA/TTS, CISA, NIST, NTIAIT Plan FY2024 ≈95,0 billion $; dashboard FY2025 102,31 billion $≈74 billion the Legacy Operations and 21 billion the Development / Modernization FY2024Coherence and Memory of the State [US09]

The sums of different lines have different perimeters. They serve as control points and do not form an additive departmental estimate.

Intersectoral balance: statistical basis

The last year of the current comparable OECD ICIO — 2022. National tables of Russia, China and the United States are used to detail and control the structure; current departmental indicators 2024–2026 are connected as satellite accounts, rather than replacing the basic matrix.

SourceCoverageRole
OECD ICIO 2025 edition80 Economics + Rest of World; 1995–2022; Editorial Board January 2026Total three-country 30×30 Model [M01]
RussiaRosstat base tables for 2021 and 2016Internal Structure Control [RU01, RU02]
ChinaNBS Yearbook 2025: competitive and non-competitive tables for 2023, 20×20 ProductsSeparation of domestic and imported products [CN02]
USABEA Supply, Use, Import and Requirements tablesDetailing Industries and Full Needs [US02, US03]

A single bridge to ISIC Rev.4 is used to aggregate the source industries. Cash flows are in base prices and current dollars. PPP cannot be inserted into the transaction matrix: it will destroy the coherence of trade flows.

Three countries × 10 SECTORS Diagonal blocks Zᴿᴿ, Zᶜᶜ, Zᵁᵁ — domestic supply; non-diagonal supply between powers. Rest of World remains an external account, otherwise the import of third countries will mistakenly become the value added of the three.

Ten comparable sectors

№SectorISIC Rev.4Main functional owners
1APC and foodA, C10–12Ministry of Agriculture / MARA / USDA
2Production, fuel, oil refiningB, C19Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Natural Resources / NEA / DOE, DOI
3Electricity and utility systemsD–EEnergy, housing, ecology
4Chemistry, pharmaceuticals, metals, materialsC20–24Industry, Health, Defense
5Machinery, electronics, transport equipmentC25–30Industry, science, transport, defense
6Other manufacturing industryC13–18, C31–33Industry and trade
7Construction and infrastructureFConstruction, transport, energy
8Trade, transport and logisticsG–ITrade and transport
9ICT, finance, real estate, business servicesJ–NFinance, digital sphere, regulators
10State, science, education, health, cultureO–TPublic and social institutions

Basic formulas

NodeFormulaInterpretation
Output Balancexᵢ = Σⱼzᵢⱼ + yᵢ; xⱼ = Σᵢzᵢⱼ + vⱼOutput equals intermediate sales plus final demand; costs equal intermediate inputs plus value added
Direct coefficientsA = Z · x̂⁻¹How many row products are directly required per column output unit
Reverse MatrixL = (I − A)⁻¹; Δx = LΔyFull direct and indirect output from changes in final demand
Departmental bridgeΔVAᵐⁱⁿ = G · q̂ · ΔxG distributes primary responsibility, q translates output into value added or result
KnowledgeA* = A + θKK - satellite matrix of knowledge transfer; θ - confirmed speed of implementation
UseBenefit = qᵀ(xsync − xbase) + ΔExpectedLoss − CcoordConsidered as value added and preventable damage, not as gross output
SUSTAINABLE CONDITION The spectral radius of the author's matrix A is equal to 0,528 < 1. Therefore, the inverse matrix of Leontiev exists, and the solution converges.

Author's normalized balance: 100 units of issue

SectorReleaseIntermediate salesFinal demandIn between costsValue added
APC and food5.03.31.72.52.5
Production, fuel, oil refining12.08.53.55.56.5
Electricity and utility systems4.03.50.52.02.0
Chemistry, pharmaceuticals, metals, materials11.07.43.67.23.8
Machinery, electronics, transport equipment15.08.56.510.05.0
Other manufacturing industry7.03.23.84.32.7
Construction and infrastructure9.03.15.95.33.7
Trade, transport and logistics14.05.48.67.07.0
ICT, finance, real estate, business services14.06.17.95.09.0
State, science, education, health9.02.56.52.76.3
Total100,051,548,551,548,5

Author’s internally agreed billet, not official statistics of Russia, China or the United States.

51,5% intermediate intensity from release48,5% value added from issue2,06 weighted multiplier gross output0,528 spectral radius stable system

Matrix of direct dependencies

Figure 3. Value — product units of a row for 100 units of column output. The sector numbers correspond to the previous table.

Supplier ↓ / User →12345678910
1. APK5.10.40.42.41.121.80.75.10.61.8
2. Extraction3.87.427.722.67.03.48.210.71.60.9
3. Energy3.65.22.65.34.92.42.93.02.01.6
4. Materials7.37.53.89.317.26.713.53.51.00.7
5. Machines5.98.64.37.013.06.311.510.07.44.2
6. Other prom.6.12.21.11.83.36.53.02.63.33.8
7. It does.1.72.42.42.02.71.85.42.84.24.7
8. Logistics9.35.43.46.67.66.06.04.73.22.3
9. ICT/services5.85.83.46.87.65.06.05.87.24.1
10. Goss/soc.1.41.01.01.62.31.51.81.75.25.8

Author's matrix A; percentages from the output of the consumer industry.

Critical Direct Links: Mining → Energy 27,7; mining → materials 22,6; APK → Other food and consumer industries 21,8; materials → Machines 17,2; materials → Construction 13,5; Machines → own issue 13,0.

Multipliers and bottlenecks

Figure 4. The power of the physical chain and the criticality of the information layer differ.

SectorμBLFLExcessNarrow placeReproduction
APK2.070.990.8395%7108
Mining and fuel1.980.951.4497%12115
Energy and housing2.030.970.8497%6120
Materials and Chemistry2.361.131.2389%31112
Machines and electronics2.451.171.2985%55125
Other industry2.311.100.8067%29105
Construction2.281.090.7791%12110
Trade and logistics2.060.991.0492%17115
ICT and business services1.740.831.0767%100130
State and Social Sphere1.620.770.7095%8118

All indicators are derivatives of the author's matrix; 100 in reproduction means a simple replacement of wear.

The investment only in the "biggest multiplier" is insufficient. Machines and materials create a physical wave, but ICT, finance, standards, metrology and interoperable data determine whether the wave will turn into a sustainable chain.

How Ministries Are Overlaid on Industries

FunctionMajor sectorsChannel of influenceMonitoring
Finance and macro-management9 ICT/Finance/Services; 10Rate, Taxes, Customs, Statistics, GuaranteesDo not ascribe all Treasury or Treasury sector 9
Science and education5 machines; 9 ICT; 10 state/social sphereGrants, personnel, laboratories, standards, procurementKnowledge is taken into account through K and confirmed implementation
Industry and trade4–6 materials and manufacturing; 8 tradeSubsidies, credit, standards, export accessMain effect: change of coefficients A and import share
Energy2 mining; 3 energy; 4 materials; 7 infrastructureTariff, power, reserve, network modernizationEnergy is included in almost all columns A
Transport5 machinery; 7 infrastructure; 8 logistics; 9 dataCapturing, security, capacityKPI - time, reliability and cost, not just km
APK and food1 APK; 4 Chemistry; 5 Engineering; 8 LogisticsProduction, insurance, sanitation, foodUSDA/HHS-like transfers separate from issue
Health and demographics4 pharma; 5 medical equipment; 10 social sphereInsurance, prevention, treatment, familyThe result is interdepartmental: housing, income, education
Defence and security4–5 manufacturing; 9 ICT; 10 stateReadiness, reserves, cyber defense, emergency situationsCivil Spillover requires separate verification
EcologyAll 1–10 through emissions and resourcesStandards, monitoring, recovery, recyclingSeparate environmental satellite account
Figure and data9 ICT; horizontally 1–10Registries, identifiers, API, cyber resistanceAnti-double-count: the effect is distributed according to the results of other blocks
The sum of the primary responsibility weights for each sector is 1. Consultative participation is conducted by a separate matrix, otherwise the same result will be attributed to several departments.

Getting Out Through Meanings: Eight Public Capabilities

MeaningOperational DefinitionExamples KPI
SovereigntyMaintaining critical functions under external constraintsImport dependency; internal critical value added; savings; concentration of suppliers
ReproductionReproduction of population, health, work, skills and capitalLife expectancy and healthy years; fertility; employment; capital renewal
OptionalityRealistically available technological, production and logistics alternativesR&D/GDP; high-tech export; alternative suppliers; patents/standards; Internet
ResilienceShock absorption and restoration of function in a given timeRTO/MTTR; reserve; energy independence; stress tests; efficiency
Trust / LegitimacyPredictability of rules, fairness of procedures and proven quality of servicesRule of Law; enforcement control; enforcement of decisions; complaints; quality of services
DevelopmentExpanding productive human and economic opportunitiesGDP per capita at PPP; productivity; employment; R & D; education and health
SecurityProtection of life, infrastructure and institutionsMurders; political stability; stress test of critical objects; accidents
Public goodsPositive effect wider than the direct payerCO₂e; clean energy; open knowledge and data; epidemiological and climate protection
Costs are not automatically considered as a result. The department receives a contribution to the semantic output only when the independent KPI is changed.

Normative map of functions to meanings

Functional blockSouv.Resp.Opts.Word of mouth.Dover.Razv.Bezop.Common.
Strategy and management25010102551510
Finance, Taxes, Customs2552015102050
Industry, trade, food2015151552055
Energy, transport, communication, number15101520520105
Science and education51530101020010
Health, work, housing0351020201005
Defense, Right, CS155515150405
Ecology and external benefits551020155535

Interest is the author's starting matrix. Each line is summed up to 100%; weights must be fixed before the beginning of the budget period.

Academies of Sciences belong primarily to the Science and Education block, but their final results go into optionality, development, safety, and public goods. Publication itself is a release; proven technology, an open standard, or risk reduction is a meaningful exit.

Demonstration model 0–100

Figure 5. A profile of opportunities, not a moral hierarchy or official ranking.

CountrySouv.Resp.Opts.Word of mouth.Dover.Razv.Bezop.Common.Medium
Russia74.347.933.154.933.436.741.227.543.6
China80.648.673.556.942.138.278.647.658.3
USA52.465.182.468.872.183.557.143.965.7

Official source WDI/WGI; weights, anchors and summary scores are author's. The years of the initial series differ (2020–2024).

CountryStrength of the modelNarrowness of modelWhat is not included
RussiaResource autonomy and savingsOptionality, common goods, institutional external proxiesNot included strategic weapons and rare mineral reserves
ChinaIndustrial and resource sovereignty, security, technological optionDemographics and per capita incomeExternal institutional proxies are not equal to internal approval
USADevelopment, R&D, institutional proxiesSavings, industrial share, carbon contourThe dollar’s financial role is not included
STRATEGY FOR THE NUMBER PLACE Equilibrium Index: 0,7 × geometric average + 0,3 × minimum. Result: Russia 37,4; China 50,7; USA 58,2. This is a diagnostic scenario, not a second rating.

The benefits of synchronizing the three powers

Figure 6. Central scenario: average index 55,9 → 60,0.

MeaningAverage baseBest practices25% GapAfter
Sovereignty69,180,6+2,971,9
Reproduction53,865,1+2,856,7
Optionality63,082,4+4,967,9
Resilience60,268,8+2,162,4
Trust / Legitimacy49,272,1+5,754,9
Development52,883,5+7,760,5
Security59,078,6+4,963,9
Public goods39,747,6+2,041,6
+1,7 p.p. closed 10% Breakdown Low Scenario+4,1 p.p. closed 25% the Central Gap+6,6 p.p. closed 40% Gap High4,1 p.p. break-even cost threshold

Sensitivity and Limitations of Meaning Index

Weight systemRussiaChinaUSA
Equal weight: 12,5% each meaning43,658,365,7
Sovereignty/security: by 20%; sustainability 15%47,863,064,7
Human/Development: Reproduction and Development by 20%43,053,568,1
Sustainable future: common goods 20%; optionality and sustainability according to 15%42,057,964,5
Range at ×0,5/×2 The weight of meaning41,6–47,056,0–60,763,2–67,6
  • WGI - perception-based external proxies; they do not measure public approval and do not exhaust legitimacy.
  • The years of the original WDI are different: murders, renewable electricity, and manufacturing share have a lag.
  • Thresholds are a normative choice. Anchors and weights should be approved in advance and published together with the result.
  • One strong indicator should not fully compensate for failure: therefore, in addition to the average, a minimum and a geometric index are published.
  • Causality is not attributed without a control group, a temporal break, an instrument, or assessed elasticity.

Passport of the project

FieldQuestionMinimum standard
Issue addressedWhat is the risk or deficit without a project?Baseline and counterfactual scenario
Fiscal entranceWho and how much is paying?Currency, year, budget perimeter
Financial riskWhat guarantees, assets and liabilities arise?Term, bet, probability of loss
Industry momentumWhat elements Δy and A are changing?Sector, import share, suppliers
Departmental ownerWho is responsible for the main result?One primary owner; co-executors separately
Physical ReleaseWhat is created or delivered?t, km, MW, operations, trained people
OutcomeWhat really got better?Time, price, quality, availability, reliability
MeaningWhat social ability enhances outcome?One primary and up to two secondary meanings
External effectWhat is being transferred to other industries, countries or generations?CO₂e, health, import, risk
AdditionalityWhat would have happened without coordination?Comparison with offline scenario
VerifierWho confirms KPI regardless of the owner?Statistics, audit, academic replication
Stop ruleWhen does the project change or stop?Threshold, correction period, reversible exit
ANTI-DOUBLE-COUNT One KPI has one primary owner, but may have multiple co-owners. Economic effect, prevented damage and semantic output are published separately.

The First Pilots' Portfolio

PilotParticipantsProductKPI
Compatible supply-use / input-output tablesStatistical Services, OECD/UN, academiesUniform product codes, import, value added, carbon30×30 The matrix is reproduced by an independent team
Reliability of power gridsEnergy regulators, system operators, laboratoriesStress test protocol and exchange of impersonal parametersReduction of RTO and emergency non-holiday
Methane and Industrial EcologyEnvironmental agencies, space and scientific organizationsSatellite verification and single coefficientsTons of confirmed prevented CO₂e
Epidemiological Early WarningSanitary departments, CDC-like services, academiesSamples, metadata, spare capacityTime from signal to confirmation and response
Critical LogisticsTransport, Customs, Ports, StandardizationCompatible documents and emergency routesTime and cost of restoration of supply
Open scientific standardsRAS, CAS, National Academies, NIST/Rosstandart/SAMRReference materials, metrology, replicationNumber of reproducible methods and standards

Pilot architecture: limited perimeter → common base line → independent verification → 12–18 months → The decision to scale/modify/stop. Political unification, a single budget and critical monodependency are not required.

Conclusions

01 Ministries are not industries. They change the final demand, rules, cost of capital, standards, infrastructure, and the ability of industries to interact.
02 The budget balance without credit, physical, inter-industry and semantic layers systematically overestimates the development of funds and underestimates the horizontal effects.
03 Russia: the largest direct federal priority is security; the main civil issue is the conversion of knowledge and heavy competencies into serial demand.
04 China: The state budget is combined with large banking, regional and corporate flows; the main structural challenge is demographic and domestic reproduction.
05: Federal outlays are dominated by social insurance, health care, and interest; a small budget of standard or statistics can affect trillions of dollars.
06 Machines, materials, and construction are prioritized in the physical balance; in the system, data, finance, software, metrology, and standards.
07 Academies of Sciences are useful not by the number of publications, but by the speed of the testable transition → Standard/Technology → implementation → Reduction of cost or risk”.
08 A semantic account makes one answer what the ability of a society creates a program, and does not allow one to call the expense the result.
09 The central synchronization scenario gives +4,1 points of the sense index; it is beneficial while the average coordination losses are lower 4,1 Paragraphs.
10 Working synchronization is modular, verifiable, reversible and open to third parties under the same rules. Its core is compatible data and independent verification.

Annex A. Baseline indicators of the semantic model

IndicatorRussiaChinaUSA
Gross Savings, % of GDP (2024)30,8442,7216,60
Net energy imports, % energy use−75,14 (2022)23,96 (2023)−9,00 (2023)
Manufacturing VA, % of GDP13,26 (2024)24,84 (2024)10,53 (2021)
Life expectancy, years (2024)73,4478,0278,89
Fertility (2024)1,4181,0131,6265
Employment / population, % (2024)60,3261,9359,47
R&D / GDP0,94 (2024)2,58 (2023)3,45 (2023)
High-tech exports, % manufactured exports9,73 (2021)26,28 (2024)24,32 (2024)
Internet users, % (2024)94,3692,0094,69
Renewable electricity, % (2021)19,1528,4320,27
GDP per capita PPP, const. intl$ (2024)41 89123 84175 698
Intentional homicides per 100k6,77 (2021)0,50 (2020)5,76 (2023)
CO₂e per capita, t (2024)13,989,3213,62
Scientific articles per million (2023)594,9661,21 279,4
WGI Government Effectiveness (2024)45,168,877,8
WGI Rule of Law (2024)37,147,073,5
WGI Control of Corruption (2024)29,849,669,9
WGI Voice & Accountability (2024)32,027,972,4
WGI Political Stability (2024)50,563,364,3

Sources: World Development Indicators and Worldwide Governance Indicators. Values are rounded; years are shown in rows.

Annex B. Formulas of sense account

IndicatorFormula
Internal block value addedXc,b = vc′ · Lc · fc,b
Attribution FlowCc,b,m = Xc,b · pc,b · gb,m; Σm gb,m = 1
Smyslovay KPISc,m = Σj ωm,j · Nm,j(xc,j); Σj ωm,j = 1
Positive rationingN⁺(x) = 100 · clip((x−L)/(U−L), 0, 1)
Reverse rationingN⁻(x) = 100 · clip((U−x)/(U−L), 0, 1)
Causal contribution with known elasticityΔŜc,m = Σb gb,m · εm,b · Δln Xc,b
SynchronizationTm(ρ) = S̄m + ρ(maxc Sc,m − S̄m) − dm
Equilibrium IndexEc = 0,7 · exp(Σm βm ln(Sc,m+ε)) + 0,3 · minm Sc,m

Attribution is not a monetary measure of well-being and does not add up to GDP.

Annex C. Sources

Primary and methodological sources. Date of access: 27 August 2026.

[M01] OECD Inter-Country Input-Output Tables, edition 2025

[M02] OECD harmonised national Input-Output Tables

[RU01] Rosstat: National Accounts and Cost-Output Tables

[RU02] Rosstat: basic tables "costs-release" for 2021 year

[RU03] Rosstat: Revised GDP estimate 2024

[RU04] Ministry of Finance of Russia: preliminary execution of the federal budget for 2024

[RU05] Government of Russia: federal budget 2026–2028

[RU06] Ministry of Education of Russia: expenses of the state program "Development of Education"

[RU07] Ministry of Education and Science of Russia: Youth Laboratories

[RU08] Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia: results of the manufacturing industry 2024

[RU09] Ministry of Energy of Russia: scheme and program for the development of electric power systems

[RU10] Ministry of Transport of Russia: report on results 2024

[RU11] Ministry of Agriculture of Russia: results and priorities of agro-industrial complex 2024

[RU12] Budget Act of the Federal Migration Service for 2026

[RU13] State Duma: budget section "National Defense" 2026

[RU14] The State Duma: expenditures on environmental protection

[RU15] Ministry of Finance of Russia: national project "Data Economy"

[CN01] NBS China: Statistical Communiqué 2025

[CN02] NBS China Statistical Yearbook 2025: Input-Output Tables

[CN03] Ministry of Finance China: budget execution 2025

[CN04] State Council of the People's Republic of China: defense budget 2025

[CN05] Chinese Academy of Sciences: official profile

[US01] OMB: Historical Tables, Budget of the U.S. Government

[US02] BEA: Input-Output Accounts Data

[US03] BEA: Interactive Input-Output Accounts

[US04] Federal Reserve: Monetary Policy Report, July 2026

[US05] EIA: U.S. energy production reached record high in 2024

[US06] FHWA: Highway Statistics 2024

[US07] CMS: National Health Expenditure Fact Sheet

[US08] EPA: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks

[US09] GAO: Federal IT spending and legacy systems, FY2024

[WB01] World Bank: World Development Indicators

[WB02] World Bank: Worldwide Governance Indicators

[UN01] UN Statistics: handbook on Supply-Use and Input-Output Tables

Annex D. Terms

TermDefinition
Supply-Use TableTable of resources and use: production, import and use of products by industries and end users.
Input-Output TableA symmetric table of cross-industry supply, value added and final demand.
Release multiplierThe total gross output arising in all industries per unit of final demand; contains a re-account of intermediate products.
Value addedIssuance minus intermediate consumption; correct basis for aggregation of economic result.
BL / FLStandardized backward and forward system connectivity of the industry.
Hypothetical extractionComparison of the system with the industry and without it to assess system criticality.
Satellite accountExpanding national accounts for ecology, health, knowledge or other outcomes without mixing units.
The Meaningful ExitObserved social capacity arising from the passage of resources through institutions and industries.
AdditionalityPart of the result that would not have occurred without the project or coordination.
Break-even CoordinationThe maximum average loss from agreement, in which the net semantic effect is still non-negative.

End of document

Other published edition: From budget to meaning Ministerstva_Uchrezhdeniya_Mezhotraslevoi_Balans_Smysly_2026.pptx · web text +

30 × 30

BOOK OF BALANCE

the Ministry • Institutions •

3 Countries × 10 Sectors

Russia • China • USA

Functional slice 2024–2026

Structural base OECD ICIO 2022

MEANS OF EXITS

27 August 2026

Systemic balance is more important than budget

SUMMARY FOR DECISIONS

30 × 30

2,06

55,9 → 60,0

4,1 p.p.

Model Core

Multiplier

sense index

break-even

three countries × ten sectors

Author's balance 100 units

25% Closing the gap

coordination loss threshold

The unit of analysis is the chain "Institute → industry → result → public sense", not the departmental line of expenditure.

Machines and materials spread the physical impulse.

Data, finance, software and standards hold the system.

The budget does not become a result without an independent KPI.

Benefits are considered as value added and preventable losses.

Ministries consider entrances - society evaluates exits

TRANSFORMATION LOGIC

RESOURCE

INSTITUTE

INDUSTRY

RESULT

MEANING

Budget • credit

labor • import

Program • Rule

purchase • standard

Direct and indirect

Issue • import

Price • time

Quality • Access

Ability of society

Prevented risk

Expenses are not automatically counted as a result: a contribution arises only when you change the independent output-KPI.

Five Balances instead of one

ARCHITECTURE STUDY

Appropriation • Taxes • Purchases

Perimeter and Year

Fiscal entrance

credit • guarantees • assets • liabilities

Stock ≠ stream

Financial balance

Z • A • L • Import • Value Added

without double counting

Intersectoral flow

MW • TWT·h • t • Kilomile • years of life • RTO

Quality and Access

Physical result

8 sustainable social abilities

Independent KPI

The Meaningful Exit

m = H · Q · (I − A)⁻¹ · G · b − r

METHOD

General formula of state effectiveness

budget impulse

Bridge to Industries

full chain

entrance

Responsibility

Direct +

Result factors

Map of meanings

risks and costs

outcome

Public ability

Deduction

Meaningful flow is an attribute, not a monetary measure of well-being. It cannot be added to GDP.

Three states run three different accounts

COMPATIBILITY

ParameterRussiaChinaUSA
Public PerimeterFederal budgetGeneral public budgetFederal outlays
YearCalendarCalendarfiscal year
Control share of GDP19,9% (2024)20,5% (2025)23,3% (FY2024)
The main risk of readingDefense ≠ all securitybudget ≠ Loan/State Companyagency ≠ function; transfers
Structural IO-baseRosstat 2021 + OECD 2022NBS 2023 + OECD 2022BEA + OECD 2022

GDP shares are acceptable as a macro signal, but not as a performance rating. National currencies and disparate budget lines are not summed up.

Ten Functions - Three Institutional Architectures

INSTITUTIONAL MAP

FunctionRussiaChinaUSA
FinanceMinistry of Finance • CB • FTS • RosstatMoF • PBOC • NBS • NDRCTreasury • Fed • OMB • BEA
ScienceMinistry of Education and Science • RAS • RSFMOST • MOE • CAS • NSFCNSF • NIH • NASA • DOE • DARPA
IndustryMinpromtorg • FP • RECMIIT • MOFCOM • SAMRCommerce • NIST • USTR • SBA
EnergyMinistry of Energy • Rosatom • SUENEA • NDRC • State GridDOE • EIA • FERC • NRC
TransportMinistry of Transport • Russian Railways • MotorMOT • CAAC • NRADOT • FHWA • FAA • FRA
APKMinistry of Agriculture • RosselkhoznadzorMARA • NFGA • SAMRUSDA • ERS • NASS • ARS
HealthMinistry of Health • FOMS • Ministry of LaborNHC • NHSA • MHRSSHHS • CMS • CDC • NIH • SSA
SecurityMinistry of Defense • Ministry of Internal Affairs • FSB • MESCMC • MND • MPS • MEMDoD • DHS • DOJ • FEMA • IC
EcologyMinistry of Natural Resources • REOMEE • NDRC • NFGAEPA • NOAA • DOI • FEMA
DataMincifers • RoskomnadzorCAC • MIIT • NBSOMB CIO • GSA • CISA • NIST

Russia: security is the main absorber of the federal flow

FACT • 2024–2026

40,192 trillion

10,77 trillion

4,8 trillion

0,94% GDP

Federal expenses

National Defense

National Economy

General R & D

19,9% GDP, 2024

5,32% GDP, 2024

plan 2026; wide section

WDI, 2024

ENERGY

TRANSPORTATION

APK

253,535 GW

1,874 trillion rub.

125,9 mln t

≈1 198 TWT·the C Generation 2024

539 km of roads • 1 285 Millions of passengers

Grain 2024 • 682 billion rub. by 4 Programmes

The defense of 2026 is about 2,7 times larger than the entire section "National Economy". Narrow place: science → prototype → purchase → series.

China: Human capital and industrial scale work together

FACT • 2025

28,7395 trillion

10,9279 trillion

3,9262 trillion

41,6826 trillion

the General Public Budget

Human Block

General R & D

VA Industrial

20,50% GDP

38,0% Budget • 7,8% GDP

2,80% GDP

29,73% GDP

ENERGY

LOGISTICS

DEMOGRAPHY

10 575 TWT·h

354,47 mln TEU

−3,39 million

3,891 TWt Power • Wind+Sun 47,3%

59,67 billion tons of cargo • 199 billion Express Shipped

7,92 Millions of births • 11,31 Millions of deaths

General R&D is 3,26 times the public line of science and technology: the budget is only one of the channels of knowledge.

US: the largest flows - health, finance and defense

FACT • FY2024

$6 735,3 billion

General Federal Outlays

23,3% GDP

$879,9 billion

Net interest

against defense $873,5 billion

67,5% federal expenditures - human resources; 4,9% - physical. Agency outlays cannot be read as an industry issue.

79,4% federal conduct of R&D — defense + health

Two different power circuits: knowledge and safety

FACT • DIFFERENT YEARS

R&D: 2024 / 2025 / 2023

Defense: 2024 / 2025 / 2024

Comparable share of GDP, but not institutional mechanisms: state science, corporate R&D and defense R&D have different channels of implementation.

Total structural point — OECD ICIO 2022

STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK

2021

2022

2023

2024–26

RUSSIA

GENERAL BASE

CHINA

SATELLITES

Rosstat: basic tables

Costs - Release

OECD ICIO: 80 Economics

+ Rest of World

NBS: competitive /

non-competitive IOT 20×20

Budgets, KPI, WDI/WGI

without matrix substitution

Rosstat: basic tables

Costs - Release

OECD ICIO: 80 Economics

+ Rest of World

NBS: competitive /

non-competitive IOT 20×20

Budgets, KPI, WDI/WGI

without matrix substitution

The national tables control the structure; RAS/GRAS brings the differences together while maintaining output, import, value added and final demand.

PPP is not inserted into the transaction matrix: it violates the consistency of trade flows.

V 100 Units of production only 48,5 — value added

AUTHOR MODEL

STRUCTURE OF ISSUE

DISTRIBUTION OF ISSUES

51,5

Interim Turnover

48,5

final demand

SectorReleaseIn between costsAdded value
APK52.52.5
Extraction125.56.5
Energy422
Materials117.23.8
Machines15105
Other prom.74.32.7
Construction95.33.7
Logistics1477
ICT/services1459
Goss/soc.92.76.3

The gross output multiplier 2,06 is not equal to the public benefit: intermediate products are considered several times.

Who Depends on Who

AUTHOR'S MATRIX A

supplier ↓

27,7

21.8

Mining → Energy

27.7

22.6

10.7

The largest direct connection

17.2

13.5

22,6

11.5

mining → materials

Raw Material Channel

21,8

APK → other prom.

Food Contour

The production units of a row on the 100 output column.

consumer →

Machines and materials give the greatest physical impulse

AUTHOR MODEL

LeaderμWhat strengthensRisk
Machines and electronics2,45equipment, machinery, automationMaterials • Import • Standards
Materials and Chemistry2,36all capital-intensive chainsEnergy • Ecology
Other industry2,31Consumer and production demandConcentration of suppliers
Construction2,28Infrastructure and domestic demandTimeline • asset quality

The main system node - data and business services

AUTHOR MODEL

the Narrow Place Index

ICT/services

100

Knot 100

ICT • Finance • Software

1,74, but maximum system criticality

Machines

IMPULSE 2,45

Machines • Electronics

Materials

Other prom.

largest physical wave; bottleneck 55

Logistics

Extraction

Construction

Goss/soc.

APK

Energy

Power is added only with compatible data, payments, standards and protocols.

Release multiplier →

Departmental resources go through several industries

Matrix diagram G

0 — No direct role • 1 — significant • 2 — Host

Finance

Science

RULE 1

Industry

One primary owner

Energy

Principal liability by sector = 1

Transport

APK

RULE 2

Co-executors separately

Health

The Advisory Matrix does not create a second result

Security

Ecology

KNOWLEDGE

Data

A* = A + θK

The effect of academies appears only through confirmed implementation

Demography, innovation and ecology cannot be assigned to one agency

INTERGOVERNMENTAL MISSIONS

MISSION 1

MISSION 2

Demography

Innovations

health + income + housing + education + infrastructure

KPI: healthy years of life, fertility, accessibility

Science + funding + standard + procurement + series

KPI: time from knowledge to commercial/public result

MISSION 3

MISSION 4

Ecology

Resilience

Energy + Transportation + Industry + Cities + APK

KPI: Prevented damage and restored natural capital

Defense + CHS + Health + Networks + Cyber + Logistics

KPI: RTO, MTTR, reserve, share of stress-tested functions

The mission owner coordinates - but does not assign all the results to the co-executors.

Meaning is a testable social ability, not a slogan

EIGHT OUTCOMES

Sovereignty

Reproduction

Optionality

Resilience

Critical Functions with Limitation

KPI: Imports • Savings • suppliers

People, health, skills, capital

KPI: life/HALE • fertility • Depreciation

Real Alternatives to Action

KPI: R&D • high-tech • Standards

Shock absorption and recovery

KPI: RTO • Reserve • stress-test

Trust

Development

Security

Common goods

Predictability and quality of procedures

KPI: law • audit • Services

Expanding productive opportunities

KPI: PPP/capita • productivity • skills

Safety of life and systems

KPI: Incidents • MTTR • stability

Effect wider than the payer

KPI: CO₂e • open science • eddyski

Publication is an issue. An implemented technology, an open standard or a reduced risk is a semantic solution.

Each function creates multiple meanings

COPYRIGHT H • %

Souv.

Resp.

Opts.

Word of mouth.

Dover.

Razv.

Bezop.

Common.

Good News

Strategy

40% — security

defense • right • emergency

Finance

Industry

35% — common goods

ecology • external effects

Infrastructure

Science/image.

Health/soc.

30% - optional

Science • Education

Defence/Right

Environment/External.

Lines = 100%. Weights are fixed in advance.

Power profiles differ more than budget sizes

AUTHOR MODEL 0–100

43,6 / 37,4

58,3 / 50,7

65,7 / 58,2

Russia

China

USA

Medium / Balanced

Medium / Balanced

Medium / Balanced

Synchronization: +4,1 item at cost below 4,1

Scenario • 25%

55,9 → 60,0

the General Index

+4,1 Paragraphs • +7,4%

4,1 p.p.

break-even costs

above - central effect ≤ 0

SENSE

+1,7 / +4,1 / +6,6

closed 10% / 25% / 40% gap

Macro Assessment $0,6–1,0 trillion/year and meaning +4,1 p.p. - different models; they do not add up.

Manage the result passports

EXECUTIVE CONTOUR

FieldMinimum question
Issue addressedWhat happens without a project?
Sign inWho pays and what is the risk?
IndustryWhich Δy and A are changing?
OutcomeWhat is cheaper / faster / more reliable?
MeaningWhat ability creates the result?
AdditionalityWhat wouldn’t have happened autonomously?
VerifierWho independently confirms?
Stop ruleAt what threshold is the stop?

PILOT 1

Compatible with IO/SUT

codes • import • VA • carbon • independent replication

PILOT 2

Networks, logistics, methane

stress-test • RTO • Emergency routes • Satellite Verification

PILOT 3

Science and Epidries

Open Standards • Samples • Standby Power • Response Time

Limited Perimeter → Common Base → independent verification → 12–18 months → scale / change / stop.

Combine budgets, industries, results and meanings

CONCLUSIONS

They change demand, regulations, cost of capital, standards and infrastructure.

Ministry ≠ Industry

Fiscal input, financial risk, cross-industry flow, output, and meaning are published separately.

Five books

Machines and materials provide momentum; data, finance, software, and standards hold the chain.

Two priorities

Value is a testable knowledge transition → Standard/Technology → implementation → Risk reduction.

Academy

+4,1 points in the central semantic scenario; break-even coordination — 4,1.

Synchronization

A strong state is able to conduct the resource through industry chains, turn the output into a result and preserve it as life, sustainability, trust and opportunities.

Sources cited in presentation 17

  • https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/inter-country-input-output-tables.html
  • https://rosstat.gov.ru/statistics/accounts
  • https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2025/html/sme03.htm
  • https://www.bea.gov/data/industries/input-output-accounts-data
  • [/Sources]
  • https://data360.worldbank.org/en/dataset/WB_WDI
  • https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators
  • https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/capdev/resources/details?ResourceID=36&ResourceType=handbook
  • https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/input-output-tables.html
  • https://minfin.gov.ru/ru/press-center/?id_4=39570-predvaritelnaya_otsenka_ispolneniya_federalnogo_byudzheta_za_2024_god
  • https://www.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/caizhengxinwen/202603/t20260317_3985436.htm
  • https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/information-resources/budget/historical-tables/
  • https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/313/document/277380
  • https://government.ru/news/56347/
  • https://komitet-oboron.duma.gov.ru/novosti/a9265059-877c-4b78-9903-68db68f81dea
  • https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202602/t20260228_1962661.html
  • https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202503/05/content_WS67c7ba5dc6d0868f4e8f05cf.html

Published files

State · Full published text

Package for Alexey Dyumin: The State Council, Balances and EQUILIBRIUM

Source Status: Primary Document

Set of materials for representing the balance system, EQUILIBRIUM and ECO-PPA at the level of the State Council.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/paket-dyuminu-gossovet

Open on the site

Author's methodology "EQUILIBRIUM"

and design and contract contour ECO-PPA

AddresseeAssistant to the President of the Russian Federation, Secretary of the State Council of the Russian Federation A. Mr. Dyumin
InitiatorSokolov Sergey Leonidovich
StatusProactive proposal; is not a position of public authorities
First step90-day expert-analytical testing without capital costs
Full Pilot12 months; up to 260 million rubles. only after a feasibility study and a separate decision

Moscow • 27 August 2026

NAVIGATION

Package contents

Requested solution. Organize a working presentation, determine the profile commission and the format of the inter-commission examination, then consider 90-day approbation.

№MaterialPurpose
1Cover letterAddress address A. Mr. Dyumin
2Draft resolutionSafe organizational language for referral to the commission
3Summary note for decisionProblem, proposal, constraints, first step
4Main report19 Balances, Architecture EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA, Intersectoral Model
5Passport of a two-stage pilot90 Days of Analytics + 12 months of field cycle
6Financial frameworkThe maximum benchmark is up to 260 million rubles. with a mandatory feasibility study
7Draft decisionsRecommendations of the Commission and possible formulation of further instructions
8AnnexesPassport ECO-PPA, Balance sheet, methodology 19×13×3, regulatory framework

Three principles of submission

  • First, the state task and the interagency gap; then the author’s methodology and tools.
  • Not a new power structure or parallel GIS, but a verifiable mechanism for comparing existing data and the consequences of decisions.
  • Not a request for immediate funding, but a proposal to conduct an examination, prepare a feasibility study and apply a phased admission gate.

Details to fill in before sending

Outgoing No: __________ • Date: __________ • Contact phone number: __________ • E-mail: __________

Organization/legal status of initiator: ________________________________________________

DOCUMENT 1

Cover letter

Assistant to the President of the Russian Federation,
Secretary of the State Council of the Russian Federation
A. Mr. Dyumin

On consideration of the proposal for the preparation and approbation of the intersectoral system of territorial balances "EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA"

Dear Alexey Gennadievich!

I am sending for preliminary consideration a package of proposals for the creation of an inter-commission analytical mechanism "System of Strategic Balances of the Russian Federation" using the author's methodology "EQUILIBRIUMthe " Project and Contract Outline ECO-PPA.

The method connects 19 resource and performance balance sheets to prior to capital-intensive solution to identify energy, water, human resources, transport, materials and finance deficits. ECO-PPA translates the selected scenario into a project passport with resources, obligations of the parties, KPI, Proof of results and stop criteria. The approach does not replace the powers of authorities, state statistics and existing information systems.

The first step is to offer 90-day expert and analytical testing on existing data, without creating a new federal GIS and without capital costs. Its result is priority balance sheets passports, dependency map, three scenarios, draft passport ECO-PPA and a conclusion on the feasibility of 12-month territorial pilot.

Please consider:

  • send materials for expert study to the commission in the direction of "Environmental Well-being" with the involvement, in terms of competence, of commissions on data economy, technological leadership, energy, economics and finance;
  • Conduct a working presentation with the participation of the Secretariat of the State Council, interested authorities, the Russian Academy of Sciences and relevant experts;
  • to prepare proposals for 90-day testing and, if positive, about the parameters 12-monthly pilot.

Review of the concept does not create budgetary obligations and exclusive rights. The customer, operator, suppliers, financing and independent verifier are determined in the prescribed manner.

Application: package of offers for ____ l. in 1 copies.

With respect,

C. L. Sokolov

Initiator of the project "EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA"
Contact details are filled in before sending • Signature: ____________________

DOCUMENT 2

Draft resolution of the Secretary of State

Working language. It is subject to legal and organizational editing by the Secretariat of the State Council of the Russian Federation.

The Commission of the State Council of the Russian Federation in the field of "Environmental well-being" to consider the submitted materials with the involvement of interested commissions, federal executive authorities, constituent entities of the Russian Federation, scientific and expert organizations and submit to the Secretary of the State Council of the Russian Federation proposals on the feasibility, parameters and conditions of possible pilot testing.

Recommended composition of the result of the study

  • conclusion on the compliance of the initiative with the competence and objectives of the relevant commissions;
  • a list of existing state systems and data that require compatibility without duplication of functions;
  • the specified composition of balance sheets, indicators and demonstration cross-industry chains;
  • legal model of data processing, procurement, financing and independent evaluation;
  • proposals on the territory, composition of participants, terms, cost and conditions of the pilot’s stop;
  • options for further decision: to stop, finalize, conduct a full pilot or prepare the issue for consideration at a higher level.

Proposed period of initial study

Up to 90 calendar days from the date of the organizational decision and the provision of an agreed set of source data.

The resolution does not mean

Does not meanWhy
Approval of the state programRequires separate decisions and procedures for strategic and budgetary planning
Allocation of 260 million rublesThe amount is only a limit reference to the feasibility study
Appointment of a private operatorOperator and suppliers are defined by law and applicable procurement procedures
Integration with all GISAllowed only after coordination with their operators and compliance with safety requirements
Compulsory reproductionScaling is possible only after independent evaluation of the results

DOCUMENT 3

Summary note for action

The essence of the proposal. Link the current data to the model of limitations and consequences, and the selected solution to issue through ECO-PPA as a verifiable project with resources, KPI, responsibility and independent verification.

The solution now proposed

  1. Conduct a working presentation of the project.
  2. Determine the profile commission and the format of the inter-commission working group.
  3. Consider 90-day expert-analytical approbation on current data.

Why the Inter-Commission

The industrial project is simultaneously dependent on energy, water, raw materials, transport, personnel and investment. Housing construction - from demography, communal capacity, social infrastructure and income. Environmental solution - from the technological equipment of enterprises, sources of financing and data quality. Industry analysis does not always reveal a complete set of secondary effects.

How the mechanism works

StageResult
1. SignalThe goal, problem, risk or project is fixed in a single passport
2. BalancesAffected resources, territories and restrictions are determined
3. ScriptsBasic, target and stress options are compared
4. DecisionAuthorized body chooses option; model does not make power decisions
5. ECO-PPAThe project passport is formed: parties, resources, KPI, evidence, stop criteria
6. ImplementationOperator and suppliers implement the project after legal selection
7. VerificationIndependent verifier compares baseline, costs and effect

What is offered after 90 days

Only with a positive conclusion - to prepare 12-month territorial pilot. The preliminary limit of costs can be up to 260 million rubles: up to 130 million rubles on the ecological technological contour and up to 130 million rubles on the contour of the distributed mini-generation. The amount is specified by the feasibility study and is not a budget obligation.

Expected management impact

  • early identification of the deficit before making a capital-intensive decision;
  • the visibility of cross-sectoral and interregional consequences;
  • a single passport of data, calculations and evidence;
  • comparison of the result with the cost and baseline;
  • the ability to stop an inefficient pilot before scaling.

MAJOR REPORT

1. State task and legal framework

The State Council of the Russian Federation is a constitutional state body formed by the President of the Russian Federation to ensure the coordinated functioning and interaction of the bodies of the unified system of public power, to determine the main directions of policy and priorities of socio-economic development. The proposed mechanism corresponds to this logic as an instrument of preliminary cross-sectoral and interregional study; it does not create independent powers.

1.1. Normative supports

DocumentImportance for the initiative
Federal law of 08.12.2020 № 394-FZStatus, tasks, functions, working bodies and decisions of the State Council
Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 21.12.2020 № 800Regulations on working bodies of the State Council and the Secretary
Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 22.07.2024 № 61321 Commission on Social and Economic Development
Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 29.12.2025 № 1003Model provision on the State Council Commission
Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 07.05.2024 № 309National targets up to 2030 and forward to 2036
Federal law of 28.06.2014 № 172-FZStrategic planning system of the Russian Federation

1.2. Why the existing industry contours are not enough

  • indicators are formed in different time, territorial and methodical sections;
  • Program objectives are not always checked for resources and capacity at the same time.
  • Second-order cross-industry effects are identified already in the course of implementation;
  • Data on costs, physical outcome and social impact are often found in different systems;
  • The scaling decision can be made before independent proof of effect is available.

Key position. It is not proposed to create another reporting system. It is proposed to link the current state data in the model of limitations and consequences.

2. Proposed strategic balance sheet system

A strategic balance system is a set of interrelated passports, models and rules that allow you to compare the need, available resource, reserve, territorial availability, critical limitations and confirmed result. The working designation of the author's methodology is "EQUILIBRIUM".

2.1. Five layers of model

LayerWhat is connected
Earmarked contributionNational goals, state programs, regional strategies, quality of life indicators
ResourcePeople, knowledge, natural resources, capacity, infrastructure, capital and data
InterbranchFlows of products, services, energy, water, materials, labour, transport and finance
TerritorialPlacement of needs, resources, facilities, risks and reserves
EffectiveActual social, economic, environmental and technological effects

2.2. Unit of analysis

For each balance sheet, account is taken of: stock at the beginning of the period; production or reproduction; incoming and outgoing flows; available capacity; use; loss; mobilized reserve; stock at the end of the period; forecast need; quality and territorial availability of the resource.

Balanced identity. Zᵢ(t+1) = Zᵢ(t) + Pᵢ(t) + Inᵢ(t) − Uᵢ(t) − Outᵢ(t) − Lᵢ(t) ± εᵢ(t). The formula is configured for each object and does not replace industry methods.

The effective offer is calculated taking into account the quality and availability: Seff = S × q × a. Resiliency: M = (Seff + R − D) / D, where R is the mobilized reserve, D is the forecasted need.

3. Architecture "EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA"

Architecture shares observation, calculation, decision making, execution, and effect confirmation. One subject should not simultaneously possess critical data, determine the weights of the model, make a power decision, execute it and confirm the result.

Figure 1. Functional architecture of the pilot

3.1. Division of roles

ParticipantFunctionLimitation
State Council / CommissionStrategic review, coordination, recommendations, synthesis of practicesNo control over the pilot's funds
Secretary of State CouncilOrganizational coordination of working bodies, materials and agendasIt does not single-handedly approve the program.
The Government and the FederalRegulation, expertise, official data, possible financing decisionsOnly within the competence
Subject of the Russian FederationSite, source problem, regional data, permissions and customer with a separate solutionLetter of interest does not equal obligation to finance
Russian Academy of SciencesScientific and methodological examination of models, indicators and causal relationshipsIt does not replace state expertise.
EQUILIBRIUM / IACMethodology, data certification, scenarios, balance sheetsDoes not make power decisions
ECO-PPAProject and contract framework: resources, obligations, KPI, evidence, stop criteriaA specific legal model is defined for each project
SPECZASHCHITAPossible cooperation contour of execution and consortiaWithout exclusive status; participation in the prescribed manner
ESG-IR / independent evaluationBaseline, verification of data, fact of work and effectVerifier is not affiliated with the performer
SFERACommunication, collection of initiatives and dissemination of proven practicesIt does not replace the official channels of power.

3.2. Role of GASMP and monitoring

GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM" can be considered as a promising source of observations and forecast signals in the environmental, aerospace and risk-oriented contour. Only authorized sources are used in the pilot; direct connection to state systems is possible after agreement with their operators.

4. ECO-PPA How to translate a decision into execution

Function ECO-PPA. Turn the chosen scenario from an analytical recommendation into a legally, financially and technologically verifiable project.

ECO-PPA is not offered as an independent type of contract, budgetary mechanism or a basis for circumventing the current regulation. This is the framework for the preparation of the project. For each application, the customer, the legal structure, sources of funds, the order of purchase, the distribution of risks, the rights to the results of intellectual activity and the data regime are separately determined.

4.1. Mandatory elements of the passport ECO-PPA

  • public and territorial problem; baseline and control zone;
  • purpose, measurable result and time frame;
  • Affected strategic balances and resource constraints;
  • composition of works, equipment and data;
  • parties, roles and confirmed powers;
  • sources of financing, CAPEX, OPEX and the full cost of ownership;
  • KPI with formulas, units, data owners and periodicity;
  • stages of admission, stop criteria and procedure for changing the project;
  • conditions of independent verification and publicity of results;
  • rights to data, models, program code and solution portability;
  • procedure for completion, dismantling, transmission or replication.

4.2. Gate of Admission

GateStageTransition condition
G0Passport problemsConfirmed territory, baseline, participants and success criteria
G1ExpertiseObtained legal, technical, scientific and financial-economic conclusions
G2ReadinessSite, customer, sources of funds, purchase, permissions, information and data are defined
G3DeploymentWorks completed, equipment accepted, measurements valid
G4Independent evaluationThe effect is confirmed regarding the baseline and control conditions
G5DecisionScale, modify, repeat or stop

Transition to the next stage is allowed only after a positive gate-review. The pilot does not create an obligation to scale.

4.3. Formula of the operating cycle

Cycle. Signal → Balance Diagnostics → script → Decision of the authorized body → Passport ECO-PPA → Legal selection of performers → Implementation → independent verification → adjustment or scaling.

5. 19 Linked Balances System

The list is a project classifier for approbation. It does not introduce new official reporting and can be adjusted based on the results of interdepartmental and scientific expertise. These bodies and organizations are considered exclusively as potential participants and data holders. The distribution of responsibility is possible only by a separate decision.

№BalanceEntrances → exitsKey KPIPotential participants / data
1Demographic balancePopulation by cohort, birth, entry → deaths, departures, migration balancenatural movement; OPG; TFR; migration; demographic burdenMinistry of Labor, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Rosstat, RF subjects
2Public health and health power balanceNeed; personnel, capacity, medicines, finances → help and years of healthy lifeHealthy OPG; preventable mortality; personnel; waiting; accessibilityMinistry of Health, Rospotrebnadzor, FFOMS, Roszdravnadzor, Rosstat
3Balance of labor resources and competenciesEmployable population, graduates, migration, retraining → employment, vacancies, unemploymentDeficit by occupation; employment; structural unemployment; productivityMinistry of Labor, Rostrud, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Economic Development, Rosstat
4Balancing education, science, technology and innovationContingents, personnel, funding, laboratories → graduates, research, patents, implementationsPlaces and personnel; employment; R&D costs; implementations; critical technologiesMinistry of Education, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Rospatent, Rosstat
5Balance of income, consumption, savings and social supportSalary, income, transfers → taxes, consumption, savings, debtReal incomes; poverty; differentiation; debt burden; targetingMinistry of Labor, Ministry of Finance, FTS, SFR, Rosstat, Bank of Russia — within the competence
6Balancing cultural infrastructure and public demandInstitutions, foundations, heritage, personnel, funding → participation, visit, restoration, digital accessAccessibility; participation; heritage status; personnel; digital accessibilityMinistry of Culture, Ministry of Culture, Rosstat, Russian Federation subjects
7Food balanceProduction, import/import, reserves → processing, consumption, export/export, lossSelf-sufficiency; availability; consumption; reserves; lossesMinistry of Agriculture, Rosselkhoznadzor, Rosrybolovstvo, Minpromtorg, Rosstat
8Housing, settlement and infrastructure balanceHousing fund, commissioning, repair; demand; housing and communal services capacity →m²/person; availability; emergency fund; utilities; construction cycleMinistry of Construction, Ministry of Economic Development, Rosreestr, Rosstat, subjects of the Russian Federation
9Land and soil balanceLand Fund, Inclusion, Remediation → Exemption, Degradation, Pollution, ReclamationLand use; fertility; degradation; reclamation; cadastreMinistry of Agriculture, Ministry of Natural Resources, Rosreestr, Rosselkhoznadzor, Rosleskhoz
10Water balanceStock, stock, fence, negotiable → consumption, discharge, lossDeficiency; Quality; Losses; Wastewater Treatment; Water CapacityMinistry of Natural Resources, Rosvodresursy, Roshydromet, Rospotrebnadzor, Rosprirodnadzor, Minstroy
11Fuel and energy balanceProduction/generation, imports, inventories → conversion, consumption, exports, lossesPower reserve; reliability; network losses; energy intensity; dependence on equipmentMinistry of Energy, Rostechnadzor, FAS, Rosstat, entities and infrastructure organizations
12Mineral and material balanceStocks, extraction, import, recyclables → processing, use, export, wasteCritical raw materials; processing depth; import dependence; material capacity; recyclablesMinistry of Natural Resources, Rosnedra, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Rosstandart, Rosstat
13Intersectoral production balanceRelease and import → intermediate consumption, final demand, accumulation, stocks, exportsVTS; capacity utilization; chain breaks; productivity; domestic value addedMinistry of Economic Development, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Ministry of Agriculture, Rosstat, FAS, industry FOU
14Transport and logistics balanceNetwork, park, terminals, capacity → flows, transit, downtimeCapacity reserve; delivery time and reliability; costs; bottlenecksMinistry of Transport, Rosavtodor, Roszheldor, Rosaviatsia, Rosmorrechflot, Rosstat
15Environmental balance and waste management balanceEmissions, discharges, waste, disturbed land → cleaning, disposal, restoration, residual loadImpact; Cleanup; Disposal; Harm management; Ecosystem restorationMinistry of Natural Resources, Rosprirodnadzor, Roshydromet, Rosleskhoz, Rospotrebnadzor, Rosstat
16Budget and tax balanceRevenues, transfers, borrowings → expenses, transfers, debt serviceSustainability of the budget; debt; performance; obligations; tax base; unfinishedMinistry of Finance, Federal Treasury, FTS, Rosstat; Accounts Chamber - external participant
17Investment and financial balanceSavings, profit, budget, credit, bonds, capital → fixed / working capital, repayment, outflowInvestment/GDP(GRP); funding gap; cost of capital; delay; project readinessMinistry of Economic Development, Ministry of Finance, Bank of Russia, VEB.RF, Rosstat, development institutions
18External economic balance and balance of critical dependenciesExport/import, income, capital → calculations, liabilities, foreign positionTrade balance; current account; NOE; critical imports; concentration of marketsMinistry of Economic Development, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Ministry of Finance, FCS, Bank of Russia, Rosstat
19Balancing strategic resilience and continuity of vital systemsRisks, critical objects, reserves, protective and duplicative capacities → incidents, damage, recoveryAvailability of services; recovery time; reserves; continuity plans; GIS redundancyEmergencies Ministry, Ministry of Emergency Situations, FSTEC, Roskomnadzor, profile FOUs and subjects

Rosstat should be involved as a cross-cutting methodological participant in official statistics; departmental systems as sources of operational data. The Bank of Russia, the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, the Security Council of the Russian Federation and other bodies participate only with the relevant decision and within the competence.

5.1. Cross-Channel Demonstrations

ChainVerified Connectivity
HousingHousing → materials → Personnel → Energy → Utilities → Transport → project financing
FoodFood → Land → water → energy → Storage → Logistics → retail prices
Critical ProductsRaw materials → Technology → Personnel → investments → Release → import dependence → Exports
Biotic Community: AirSources → transfer → receptors → health → measures → confirmed load change

6. Communication of 19 balance sheets with 21 commission of the State Council

Commissions are organizational directions, and balance sheets are analytical objects. One balance sheet is used by several commissions; one commission considers several balances. Therefore, the system can serve as an inter-commission language without changing the current structure of the State Council.

CommissionBalancesPractical application
Public and municipal administration1, 3, 5, 8, 16, 19Inter-level coordination, decision quality and continuity
Investments8, 11–14, 16, 17Investment security and infrastructure constraints
Infrastructure for Life1–3, 8, 10, 11, 14–17Harmonization of housing, communal, social and transport infrastructure
Workforce1–4, 13, 17Forecast of need, training and territorial distribution of personnel
Culture and traditional spiritual and moral values1, 4–6, 8Cultural infrastructure, participation and social cohesion
International Cooperation and Export4, 7, 11–14, 17, 18Export potential and critical external dependencies
Young people and children1–6, 8Demography, education, health, income and infrastructure
A Long and Active Life1–5, 8, 10, 15Health, Environment, Human Resources and Accessibility of Services
Industry3, 4, 10–18Power, raw materials, energy, logistics, technology and capital
Northern Sea Route and Arctic1, 3, 8, 10–15, 17–19Spatial constraints, logistics, resources and sustainability
Agriculture1, 3, 7, 9–12, 14–18Food, land, water, energy, logistics and exports
Family1–5, 8, 16Income, housing, services and demographic sustainability
Technological leadership3, 4, 11–13, 17–19Critical technologies, implementation and independence
Tourism1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14, 15, 17Infrastructure, personnel, environment and transport accessibility
Physical Culture and Sports1–6, 8, 17Facilities availability, health, personnel and funding
Environmental Well-being2, 7, 9–15, 17, 19Natural limitations, impacts, recovery and verification
Data Economy1–19Passporting, compatibility, quality, versioning and data security
Economics and finance5, 13, 16–18; Arch 1–19Summary of macroeconomic, budgetary and financial constraints
Energy8, 10–15, 17–19Reliability, power, equipment, investment and environmental effect
Effective and Competitive Economy3–5, 7, 11–18Productivity, competition, demand, investment and exports
Efficient transport system1, 3, 7, 8, 11–15, 17–19Capacity, availability, logistics and sustainability

Proposed route. Primary study - the Commission in the direction of "Environmental well-being"; inter-commission participation - "Data Economy", "Technological Leadership", "Energy" and "Economics and Finance". Expansion of the composition - according to the results of the primary examination.

7. Inter-industry model and equilibrium index

7.1. Economic core

The economic contour uses the official tables of resources and use and the tables "cost-release" of Rosstat. For scenario analysis, they are complemented by satellite matrices of labor, raw materials, energy, water, transport, emissions, and financing.

Basic model. x = Ax + y; Hx ≤ L; Rx ≤ R̄; Ex ≤ Ē; Wx ≤ W̄; Tx ≤ T̄; Fx ≤ F̄.

Here x is the vector of the industry release; A is the direct cost matrix; y is the final demand. H, R, E, W, T, and F are the coefficients of labour, raw materials, energy, water, transport, and financing; the upper bound is the available volume or limit.

Practical meaning: the change of one state program is recalculated not only in terms of funding, but also in terms of the need for personnel, construction materials, energy, water, logistics, imports and subsequent budget burden. The model does not replace the official forecast, but checks the mutual consistency of its prerequisites.

7.2. Integrated Navigation Index

For each indicator, a target corridor and critical boundaries are set. Normalized deviation dᵢⱼ Takes importance from 0 to 1. Balance assessment: Bᵢ = 100 × (1 − Σ αᵢⱼdᵢⱼ), Where the weights αᵢⱼ is equal 1.

Index. IRE = 100 × [∏(Bᵢ/100)ʷⁱ]^(1−λ) × [min(Bᵢ/100)]^λ. Ratio λ It is considered a "node"; for the pilot can be accepted 0,25 followed by calibration.

IRE is not a rating of authorities and does not replace primary indicators. A violation of a normative or critical threshold is issued by a separate signal and cannot be compensated for by good values of other balances.

7.3. Data quality

The Cdata data quality index is calculated separately for completeness, timeliness, comparability, source confirmation and reproducibility. Publication of the composite index without Cdata is not allowed. All weights, exceptions and manual adjustments are versioned and have an author and basis.

7.4. Balance sheet to the decision

  • Purpose, territory and affected balances;
  • resource requirement, source of coverage and limiting balance;
  • intersectoral effects of the first and second order;
  • budget, investment and foreign economic contour;
  • Impact on people and the environment;
  • stress scenario, backup and modification Bᵢ/IRE;
  • data quality, decision, deadline and benchmarks.

8. The two-stage pilot

8.1. Step A — 90-day expert-analytical approbation

The goal is to prove methodological applicability without capital expenditures and without creating a new large-scale information system. Open and provided in the prescribed manner data, 3–5 priority balances and one territorial case are used.

TimeframeStageResult
1–15 dayPreparationTerritory, problem, data, indicator owners, baseline, access mode
16–45 dayModel AssemblyData passports, cross-industry graph, deficits, reserves, digital prototype
46–75 dayScriptsBasic, Targeted and Stressful Scenarios; Scientific and Departmental Verification
76–90 dayDecisionFinal report, balance sheet note, passport ECO-PPA, decision on the next step
Results of step A
  • passports of selected balances and a catalog of data sources;
  • cross-industry map of dependencies and at least three scenarios;
  • 5–10 measurable imbalances with causes and response options;
  • Draft passport ECO-PPA and preliminary technical specification;
  • Conclusion: stop, modify or train 12-month pilot.

8.2. Stage B — 12-month territorial ECO-PPA-pilot

Stage B begins only after G1-G2: feasibility study, legal and technical expertise, site selection, customer identification and funding sources, information security requirements and procurement procedures.

TimeframeStageResult
Months 1–2Organization and surveyPassport, site, working group, baseline, TK, legal data regime
Months 3–4Methodology and design19 passports, register up to 260 indicators, feasibility studies, design solutions
Months 5–8DeploymentMonitoring, mini-generation, telemetry, data integration, testing
Months 9–10Scenarios and interventionsBasic, Targeted, Stressful Scenarios; 2–3 Managed Interventions
Months 11–12VerificationIndependent evaluation, actual costs and effects, decision to complete or replicate

8.3. Territory criteria

  • combination of residential, natural, transport and production zones;
  • presence of a background point and sensitive objects;
  • the willingness of regional and municipal authorities to participate without prior obligation to finance;
  • availability of laboratory and metrological partner;
  • the ability to form a control zone and a seasonal 12-month cycle;
  • confirmed conditions of technological connection and operation of mini-generation.

The previously proposed contour Syzran-Rameno-Smolkino can be considered only after checking the legal status of the territories, the official interest of the participants and the correctness of geographical names.

9. Preliminary financial framework

Limitation. The estimate of up to 260,0 million rubles is not a budget obligation, estimate or request for allocation of funds. It is subject to clarification based on the results of feasibility studies, survey and definition of the legal mechanism for procurement and financing.

ContourLandmarkWhat needs to be revealed
Ecological technological contourup to 130,0 million rublesR&D/design; equipment; installation; Software and data; metrology; testing; training; reserve
Distributed mini-generationup to 130,0 million rublesDesign; equipment; connection; control and telemetry; commissioning; permissions; training; reserve
Totalup to 260,0 million rublesStructure, VAT, CAPEX/OPEX and full cost of ownership are specified by the feasibility study

9.1. Requirements for the feasibility study

  • justification of the composition and number of objects;
  • separation of R&D, design, equipment, CMR, software, testing and reserve;
  • at least three commercial offers or other audited estimates;
  • CAPEX, annual OPEX and full cost of ownership for at least three years;
  • sources of financing and risk allocation;
  • legal mechanism of purchase, connection, operation and transfer of the result;
  • Evaluate single-supplier dependency and data portability.

9.2. Possible sources

Extra-budgetary investments, funds of participants, regional programs and other legitimate sources can be considered only after confirming the legal grounds and readiness of the parties. Federal co-financing is not anticipated.

10. KPI and evidentiary value

Each KPI must have a formula, unit of measure, baseline, target value, source, periodicity, and data owner. Savings, emissions and payback targets are set after the baseline is fixed and do not change retrospectively.

GroupIndicator / criterion
Passports19/19 passports for 3th month of full pilot
Data Catalog100% mandatory indicators have a source, unit, frequency and revision rule
Without new reportingAt least 85% indicators are formed from existing data
Data qualityCdata not lower than 0,85; discrepancies over 5% are explained by protocol
ScriptsBasic, Stressful and Targeted Scenarios for Each Demonstration Chain
Early warningFor 100% red zones, the cause, duration and at least two response options are determined
Support for solutionsAt least 5 projects reviewed with balance sheet
Auditability100% calculations are reproducible; manual adjustments are justified and versioned
Financial disciplineDeviation of CAPEX from the approved limit - within the limits specified by the pilot's passport
TechniquesAvailability of equipment, share of valid data, recovery time and incidents — on TK
EcologyChange of specific pollutants/resource consumption relative to baseline and control zone
EnergyAvailable capacity, production, KIUM, network consumption and cost - according to the approved method
Final SolutionIndependent report and choice: scale, refine or discontinue

11. Data, security and compatibility

The architecture is built on the principle of minimum necessary access. Prior to integration, the data composition, owners, legal basis for processing, access mode, storage, logging, depersonalization and destruction requirements are determined. Personal data, restricted access information and critical infrastructure information are used only if there are legal grounds and appropriate protection measures.

11.1. Legal conditions

  • taking into account the requirements of the legislation on information, personal data and security of critical information infrastructure - if applicable;
  • Prohibition of the promise of direct integration with federal GIS before coordination with their operators;
  • a separate threat model and component certification requirements - if required;
  • separation of open, service and protected data sets;
  • versioning of methods, sources, calculations and access rights;
  • open formats and the ability to transfer data to reduce dependence on the supplier.

11.2. Conditions of the energy and environmental contour

  • legal status of the object of generation, technological connection, accounting and mode of consumption / sale of energy;
  • land, urban planning, environmental and industrial permits;
  • equipment certification, metrological traceability, service and spare parts;
  • control zone, seasonality, laboratory testing and causal relationship between intervention and effect.

12. Risk Register

RiskControl measure
Duplication of state systemsFunction Inventory; Integration Instead of Substitution
Poor data qualityPassport sources, Cdata, fix uncertainty
Uncoordinated methodsSingle dictionary, expert group, protocol of disagreements
Violation of accessMinimization of data, differentiation of rights, journaling
Cyber RisksThreat model, backup, testing and recovery plan
Vendor lock-inOpen formats, lot separation, portability and data rights
Excess valueFeasibility studies, alternative proposals, phased funding
Conflict of interestSeparation of initiator, operator, supplier and verifier
Failure to achieve effectBaseline, control area, stop/go gate and stop right
SubstitutionConsultative status of methodology; decisions only by authorized bodies
Manipulation KPIPre-launch formulas and sources; ban on retrospective base changes
Reputational riskState language, verifiable statements, absence of unconfirmed partnerships

Mandatory reservation. Pilot implementation is carried out after obtaining the necessary approvals and permits, determining the legal grounds for data processing, sources of financing and customer, as well as conducting procurement procedures provided for by law. The presentation of the concept and its consideration do not entail budgetary obligations.

13. Road map 2026–2030

HorizonStageResult
0–90 daysExamination and prototype3–5 balance sheets, one case, data card, scenarios, passport ECO-PPA, decision on full pilot
4–12 monthsTerritorial Pilot19 passports, up to 260 indicators, monitoring, mini-generation, independent evaluation
12–18 monthsVerification and TypingModel regulations, data model, exchange requirements, cost estimation
18–36 monthsSeveral regionsComparable regional balances and interregional chains
Up to 2030Selective applicationAssessment of large cross-industry projects and early warning of critical imbalances

13.1. Matrix 19 × 13 × 3

Decomposition can be used for subsequent scaling 19 Contours × 13 pair balance × 3 Level of management = to 741 A certified cell. This is a calculation structure, not an independent symbolic indicator: the federal, regional and municipal levels use common identifiers, formulas, evidence and red limits, while maintaining their own powers and goals.

13.2. Stop-Scaling Conditions

  • no reproducible result or the effect is not separated from external factors;
  • the cost of ownership is not confirmed or exceeds the permissible limit;
  • rights to data, code and equipment are not regulated;
  • the model depends on one supplier without the possibility of transfer;
  • Safety and metrology requirements are not met;
  • Independent verification revealed a significant conflict of interest or unreliability of the data.

14. Draft decisions of the Commission

Status. Draft for discussion; final wording to be decided by the authorities.

  1. Take note of the presented concept of the system of strategic balances "EQUILIBRIUM - ECO-PPA".
  2. Recognize the appropriate conduct of interdepartmental, scientific, technical, legal and financial-economic examination of the concept.
  3. To consider the possibility of creating a working (expert) group for the preparation of a passport 90-day approbation under the profile commission; the composition and work plan to approve the chairman of the commission.
  4. To recommend interested federal executive bodies, subjects of the Russian Federation, Rosstat, the Russian Academy of Sciences and expert organizations to submit comments and proposals within the competence.
  5. According to the results of the examination, submit to the Secretary of the State Council of the Russian Federation a report on the feasibility of the pilot, site options, financing, data and legal mechanism.
  6. If the conclusion is positive, prepare a feasibility study and draft passport 12-month territorial pilot, without creating budgetary obligations until a separate decision.

14.1. Possible wording of further instructions of the President of the Russian Federation

They are used only when deciding to raise the issue to the appropriate level.

  1. The Government of the Russian Federation, together with the relevant commission of the State Council, should consider the possibility of implementing the pilot project and submit proposals containing the pilot’s passport, financial and economic justification, sources of financing, assessment of legal and technological risks and the procedure for independent evaluation of the results.
  2. To the profile commission of the State Council to summarize the results of the pilot and submit to the Secretary of the State Council proposals on the advisability of submitting the issue to the Presidium of the State Council and preparing a report to the President of the Russian Federation.

14.2. Final request of the initiator

№RequestExpected result
1Conduct a working presentationFeedback from the Secretariat and relevant commissions
2Determine the profile commission and working groupOfficial route of examination
3Consider 90-day approbationPrototype tested and decision on full pilot

ANNEXES

Annex 1. Project passport ECO-PPA

SectionWhat is fixed
1. Problem and TerritoryWhat happens, where and who is affected
2. BaselineReference period, control area, sources and data quality
3. ObjectiveMeasurable result, time and allowable corridor
4. BalancesAffected balances, resource constraints and cross-industry effects
5. PartiesCustomer, operator, suppliers, data owners, verifier
6. Legal modelContracts, procurement, permits, data, intellectual rights
7. ResourcesCAPEX, OPEX, personnel, data, capacity, infrastructure
8. WorksComposition, stages, control points, acceptance
9. KPIFormula, unit, baseline, target, source, period, owner
10. EvidenceProtocols, telemetry, laboratory, photos/acts, versions of calculations
11. RisksRegister, owner of risk, measure and residual risk
12. Stop-criteriaWhen the project is suspended, changed or terminated
13. ConclusionTransfer, operation, dismantling, data archive, replication

Annex 2. Balance sheet template

  1. Purpose and Territory.
  2. List of affected balances.
  3. Need, source of coverage and mobilized reserve.
  4. Limiting balance and expected date of deficit.
  5. Inter-industry effects of the first and second order.
  6. Budgetary, investment and foreign economic contours.
  7. Impact on population, health and the environment.
  8. Basic, Targeted and Stressful Scenarios.
  9. Change Bᵢ/IRE and data quality Cdata.
  10. Proposed solution, responsibility, timeline and benchmarks.

Annex 3. Minimum set before the full pilot starts

  • letter of interest of the pilot subject without financial obligations;
  • clarified passport of the territory and objects;
  • Feasibility study and estimate with CAPEX/OPEX and full cost of ownership;
  • legal opinion on data, procurement, land, energy and permits;
  • Technical specification and threat model;
  • list of equipment, certificates and metrology requirements;
  • baseline, control area and measurement plan;
  • Draft passport ECO-PPA and participants’ agreements;
  • plan for independent verification and management of conflicts of interest;
  • gate solution G0-G2.

Annex 4. Normative and methodological sources

1. Federal law of 08.12.2020 № 394-FZ "The State Council of the Russian Federation". Official source

2. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 21.12.2020 of 800 “Questions of the State Council of the Russian Federation”. Official source

3. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 613 of 22.07.2024 on State Council commissions. Official source

4. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 1003 of 29.12.2025 on the model provision on the commission of the State Council. Official source

5. Appointment A. Mr. Dumina Secretary of the State Council of the Russian Federation, 29.05.2024. Official source

6. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 07.05.2024 № 309 on national goals. Official source

7. Federal law of 28.06.2014 № 172-FZ "On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation". Official source

8. Rosstat: national accounts and input-output tables. Official source

9. Bank of Russia: methodology of balance of payments. Official source

Annex 5. Terms and restrictions

TermWorking definition
EQUILIBRIUMAuthor’s concept of information and analytical support of decisions; not the state system and not the authority
IACProposed information and analytical outline; status, operator and access to data are determined separately
ECO-PPAPilot training design and contract framework; specific legal design is defined for each application
SPECZASHCHITAPossible cooperation platform of execution; no exclusive rights and power functions
ESG-IRDraft voluntary evidence-based and impact assessment methodology; does not replace government control, audit and standardization
SFERACommunication environment; does not replace official channels
GASMPProposed monitoring-prognostic contour; connection to state data requires separate bases
19 balancesProject analytical classifier; not an official list of statistical reports
IRENavigational index of imbalance; not rating of authorities and not replacement of primary indicators

Conclusion

Main Package Formula. EQUILIBRIUM It shows where the imbalance is; ECO-PPA Secures the project to eliminate it; SPECZASHCHITA Can provide cooperative execution; ESG-IR independently confirms the result.

It is proposed to start with a small, reversible and verifiable step: working presentation and 90-day approbation. Only confirmed data, legal readiness, feasibility study and independent evaluation can become the basis for 12-month territorial pilot and subsequent consideration of the issue of scaling.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich
Initiator of the project "EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA"
Contact details: ______________________________
Date and signature: _________________________________

Other published edition: SYSTEM OF STRATEGIC BALANCES OF RUSSIA Prezentatsiya_Dyuminu_Gossovet_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.pptx · Web Text +

90 days

interconnected balances

12 months

two-stage pilot

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

ECO-PPA - author's design and contract framework, not standard energy PPA and not a new type of contract.

Inter-commission mechanism for coordinating goals, resources, territories and confirmed results.

up to 260 million rubles

Only after a decision and a specific

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich • Moscow • 27 August 2026

Proactive proposal. It is not an official position or decision of the authorities; it does not create budgetary obligations.

Consider 90-day approbation

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

Now it is not the approval of the program and not the allocation of funds, but limited expert study.

Working presentation

Briefly present the state task, method 19 Balance Sheets and Outline ECO‑PPA.

Profile Commission

Determine the route through the Commission "Environmental Well-being" and the format of the inter-commission group.

90-day testing

Verify applicability on existing data without new federal GIS and capital investments; organizational resources are determined separately.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

Solutions face overall deficits

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

One program depends simultaneously on seven contours: personnel, energy, water, materials, transport, data, and finance.

Different temporal, territorial and methodological data slices

Goals are not always checked for resources and capacity

An industry result may look positive as long as the second-order consequences remain outside the decision field.

Costs, physical result and social effect are in different contours

Scaling can begin before independent validation of the effect

Management gap: There is no common language for assessing the cumulative effect.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

19 balance sheets create a common language

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

For each solution, five values are compared.

Need

Resource

Limitation

Reserve

Result

The balance sheet shows

what balance becomes a “bottleneck” and when there is a deficit;

which related industries and territories affect the chosen scenario;

what reserve and legal mechanism of coverage exist;

how the primary indicators, data quality and the composite index IRE change.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

ECO-PPA converts script to project

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

ECO-PPA - author's design and contract framework: not standard energy PPA, not a new type of contract and not a budget mechanism.

Scenario

Passport ECO-PPA

Implementation

Verification

Decision

EQUILIBRIUM detects restriction

Resources, parties, KPI, stop conditions

Selection of participants in the prescribed manner

Baseline, actual costs and effect

Zoom, Change or Stop

Legal design, customer, sources of funds, procurement and permits are determined separately for each project.

The pilot does not create an obligation to replicate.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

Architecture shares solution and verification

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

Separation of functions is mandatory; ESG-IR is a draft voluntary methodology, not an official standard.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

Powers are retained, roles are separated

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

Participant

Function

Limitation

Coordination, recommendations, generalization of practice

No control over the pilot's funds

State Council / Commission

Official data and decisions within the competence

Do not transfer authority to the model

Government, FOV, RF subject

Data Passports, Scenarios and Balance Sheets

Does not make power decisions

EQUILIBRIUM / IAC

Resources, liabilities, KPI and stop criteria

The legal model is determined by the project

ECO‑PPA

Implementation and independent confirmation of the result

Functions and conflicts of interest are divided

Performer / Verifier

No private participant is granted exclusive status.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

19 balance sheets cover the entire chain

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

Man and Society

Resources and environment

Production

Finance and sustainability

1. Demography

7. Food

13. Cross-industry release

16. Budget and taxes

2. Health and capacity

8. Housing and infrastructure

14. Transport and logistics

17. Investment and finance

3. Work and competences

9. Land and soil

15. Ecology and waste

18. External dependencies

4. Education, science, technology

10. Water

19. Strategic sustainability

5. Income and support

11. Fuel and energy

6. Culture and Demand

12. Raw materials and materials

19 balance sheets is a project analytical classifier, not a new list of state reporting.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

Route through the profile commission

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

Inter-commission participation

PRIMARY MARCHRUT

Data Economy — Certification, Compatibility and Data Quality

"Environmental

well-being"

Technology Leadership - Critical Technologies and Implementation

Natural Restriction, Impact, Recovery and Independent Verification

Energy — power, connection and mini-generation

Economics and finance — feasibility studies, cost of ownership and sources of funds

The proposed route, the final decision is for the Secretariat of the State Council.

Balances - analytical objects; commissions - organizational directions.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

90 days

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

The pilot consists of two stages.

Each stage has its own result and a separate decision to continue.

STEP A

STEP B

12 months

Expert - analytical approbation

Territorial ECO-PPA-pilot

3–5 Balance Sheets • One territorial case • current data • without capital investments

Organizational and expert resources - separately

After feasibility study, expertise, site, customer, sources of funds, permits and procurement procedures

Transition is possible only after positive gate-review.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

The first 90 days - without capital investments

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

The goal is to test methodological applicability on a limited set of data. Organizational and expert resources are determined separately.

1–15 day

16–45 day

46–75 day

76–90 day

Preparation

Model Assembly

Scripts

Decision

Territory, Problem, Indicator Owners, Baseline and Data Mode

Data Passports, Dependency Map, Deficits and Digital Prototype

Basic, Targeted and Stressful Options; Scientific and Departmental Verification

Final report, balance sheet note, passport ECO-PPA and go/nogo

The result: stop, modify or prepare a full pilot.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

12 months - field cycle after admission

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

The field phase covers seasonality, technical deployment and independent assessment of the actual effect.

Organization

Site, survey, baseline, TK, data mode

MONTH 1–2

Design

19 passports, feasibility studies, estimates, legal and technical solutions

MONTH 3–4

Deployment

Monitoring, eco-modules, mini-generation, telemetry, testing

MONTH 5–8

Scripts

2–3 Managed interventions and control measurements

MONTH 9–10

Verification

Actual costs, effect, decision to complete or replicate

MONTH 11–12

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

130

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

260 million rubles — preliminary ceiling

The assessment is intended for the framework of the feasibility study. It is not an estimate, a budgetary obligation or a request for funds.

Equal division 130/130 is a project hypothesis before the feasibility study; prices, sources and cost composition are not determined.

Teo should reveal.

130

R & D, design and SMR

equipment, software and tests

million rubles.

million rubles.

CAPEX, OPEX and reserve

Ecological technological contour

Distributed mini-generation

cost of ownership ≥ 3 years

Sources of funds and risks

Total: up to 260 million rubles; VAT, CAPEX/OPEX, prices, sources and legal model are specified in the feasibility study.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

KPI Link costs and effects

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

In 90-day approbation, it is proposed to check the project thresholds: formula, unit, baseline, target, source, periodicity and data owner.

Data

100% mandatory indicators have a source and owner; at least 85% are formed from current data

Quality

Cdata ≥ 0,85; Differences from Above 5% explained by the protocol; manual adjustments are versioned

Result

Baseline, control area, actual costs and measurable environmental/energy effect

Decision

Independent report and clear choice: scale, refine or discontinue

A critical threshold cannot be compensated for by a good average.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

Six gates protect against mistakes

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

The next stage begins only after a positive gate-review.

Issue addressed

Expertise

Readiness

Works

Evaluation

Decision

Territory, baseline, participants, success criteria

Legal, scientific, technical and financial opinions

Site, customer, funds, purchase, permissions and data

Work completed; equipment accepted; measurements valid

Effect confirmed regarding baseline and control

Zoom, change, repeat measurements or stop

A negative review means stopping or returning for revision - not an automatic transition.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

Scaling is possible after checking

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

The project trajectory leads from a limited case to model passports and comparable regional balances - only after individual decisions.

0–90 days

4–12 months

12–36 months

Up to 2030

Prototype

Field Pilot

Typization

Selective application

3–5 balances, one case, data card, scenarios, passport ECO‑PPA

19 passports, up to 260 indicators, monitoring, mini-generation, verification

Regulation, data model, assessment of the cost and portability of the solution

Comparable regional balances and early warning of critical imbalances

19 × 13 × 3 = to 741 certified cell — methodical decomposition, not an independent indicator of success.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

Stop conditions are built in before launch

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

Protection against an inefficient project should work before scaling and before irreversible costs arise.

RISK

MANAGEMENT MEASURES

Duplication of systems

Function Inventory; Integration Instead of Substitution

Poor data quality

Passport sources, Cdata, fix uncertainty

Vendor lock‑in

Open formats, lot separation, portability and data rights

Conflict of interest

Separation of initiator, executor, supplier and verifier

Failure to achieve effect

Baseline, control area, stop/go gate and stop right

STOP: Effect is not replicated; cost, rights, security or permissions are not confirmed.

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

Three solutions to start the examination

FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION

Conduct a working presentation

Present a state task, 19 Balance Sheets, ECO‑PPA and the frame of a two-stage pilot.

Determine the route of examination

Profile commission and inter-commission expert group - by decision of the State Council Secretariat.

Consider 90-day approbation

On current data, without a new federal GIS, capital investment and a full pilot's commitment.

The result: to stop, to finalize or with a positive result to prepare the feasibility study and the passport of 12-month pilot.

Not requested: state program • financing 260 million • Private operator • mandatory reproduction

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA

Sources cited in presentation 29

  • Internal project source: Paket_Dyuminu_Gossovet_Balansy_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.docx, 27.08.2026
  • https://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/74135
  • [Presenter note]
  • Open with the fact that it is a package for determining the route of examination, and not a request for approval of funding.
  • https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/46186
  • https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/46219
  • Note: A further 12-month pilot is considered only after a positive conclusion.
  • Do not criticize existing systems: the problem is comparability and cross-sectoral coordination, not lack of data.
  • https://rosstat.gov.ru/statistics/accounts
  • https://www.cbr.ru/statistics/macro_itm/external_sector/pb/meth_com_bop/
  • IRE is used only as a navigation index; regulatory thresholds and primary indicators take precedence.
  • Not to call ECO-PPA an approved state contract. This is a working framework for the preparation of a specific project.
  • The scheme is a functional pilot architecture; specific organizations and legal statuses are determined by individual decisions.
  • The role chart describes the proposed distinction, rather than assigning a specific operator or performer.
  • The composition of the balance sheets is subject to expert clarification; the main thing is the cross-cutting coherence of resources and results.
  • https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202407220045
  • https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202512290122
  • Do not approve the composition of the inter-commission group on the slide: this is a proposal for primary study.
  • Do not mix the results of the stages: analytical approbation does not mean readiness for a capital pilot.
  • The time frame is counted after the organizational decision and the provision of an agreed set of baseline data.
  • To show that the 12-month cycle begins only after G1-G2 and a separate decision on the legal and financial model.
  • Financial framework is the proposal of the initiator. No obligations before the feasibility study, expertise and a separate decision.
  • Target values for object KPI are set after fixing the reference level and do not change retrospectively.
  • The gate is a project method. Specific decisions are made by authorized bodies and the customer in the prescribed manner.
  • https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201406300016
  • https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202405070015
  • Scaling is possible only after independent evaluation, typing and a separate solution.
  • The risk register must have owners, measures, residual risk and a stop trigger.
  • Close the report with three specific requests and immediately remove four possible concerns.

Published files

Strategy · Full published text

Russia: A Map of Awakening

Source Status: Primary Document

Master document and presentation of the territorial map of initiatives, meanings and points of development.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/rossiya-karta-probuzhdeniya

Open on the site

based on balance sheets, data, cooperation and provable result

Concept initiatorSokolov Sergey Leonidovich
Version and Horizonv1.0 • 28 August 2026 • 2026-2036

STATUS: Project proposal. The document is not a normative legal act, a state information system or a decision on financing.

SUMMARY FOR DECISION-MAKING

The main reserve of Russia — the coherence of the already created

Russia has state strategies, programs, scientific developments, production competencies, public initiatives, territorial resources and digital data. Constraints occur at intersections: goals, indicators, resources, performers, and territorial effects are often described in different languages and completed in different lines of responsibility.

The map offers a single through route: signal → script → Address → Initiative → Project → execution → calculated trace → Validation. The second route provides scaling: the initiative → Expertise → Co-operation → resource support → Pilot → Confirmed result → Propagation.

The draft does not replace the President of the Russian Federation, the Security Council, the State Council, the Government, federal executive bodies, subjects of the Russian Federation, municipalities, the Russian Academy of Sciences or existing state information systems. Its purpose is interagency analytical support and coordination of decisions in a single language of goals, balances, data and obligations.

Action to be taken

  1. To support the 90-day stage of expert and project development of the concept.
  2. Identify a coordinator and form an interagency working group.
  3. Prepare a passport of a limited regional pilot, a legal map, a list of data, a financial and economic justification and an independent assessment system.
  4. Based on the results of the pilot, decide to stop, adjust or scale individual modules.

Status of architecture elements

StatusValue
[D]State institution, regulatory mechanism or information source.
[P]The designed element of the author's architecture; requires examination and legal registration.
[E]An experimental mechanism proposed only for limited testing.

NAVIGATION

Contents of the master document

  • 1. Russia at the point of choice
  • 2. Definition and boundaries of "Awakening"
  • 3. The image of the target state of Russia 2036
  • 4. The Seven Principles of the Map
  • 5. Four layers of architecture
  • 6. A single development management cycle
  • 7. Nineteen contours of the national balance
  • 8. Matrix 260 and KRISTALL741
  • 9. Twelve strategic directions
  • 10. Designed ecosystem of execution
  • 11. State and Public Roles
  • 12. Data, registers, AI and security
  • 13. Economic model and ECO-PPA
  • 14. Regional Pilot
  • 15. KPI, validation and evidence
  • 16. Road map: 100 days, 1 year, 3 year
  • 17. Risks and fuses
  • 18. Draft management decision
  • Applications: initiative passport, glossary, regulatory support

[D/P] 1. Russia at the point of choice

The current system of strategic planning sets national goals, sectoral priorities, state programs and project management mechanisms. The Awakening Map does not review this authority. It answers the applied question: how to see the combined impact of decisions of different industries on people, territory and security without creating another isolated registry.

Four Gaps the Card Should Close

GapManagement investigation
Target ↔The strategic formulation does not always have a traceable chain to the original data, threshold, and owner of the result.
Industry ↔ territoryA local solution can transfer costs, risks or deficits to another sector or neighboring territory.
Resource ↔ effectThe fact of financing and implementation of the event is not identical to the confirmed social, environmental or technological result.
Pilot ↔ scalingSuccessful practices often lose technique, cost of ownership, limitations, and evidence when replicated.

Connection with the current state contour

Current framework [D]Role of the Map [P/E]
National targets up to 2030/2036The map compares initiatives and effects with goals and indicators; does not change their composition.
A common plan for achieving national goalsThe proposed passports complement monitoring, risk analysis, feedback and change management.
Spatial strategyThe territorial section is built from the object and the settlement to the subject and the Federation.
Scientific and technological strategyScientific expertise, scenario forecast and evidence base register are included in the pilot.
Digital transformation of public administrationThe analytical layer uses compatibility and automation without replacing state-owned IP.
The State CouncilThe contours of the Card can be correlated with the commissions only after a separate decision and within the competence.

[P] 2. Definition and boundaries of "Awakening"

“Awakening” is the author’s designation of the growth of the ability of a person, community and institutions to understand the consequences of decisions, preserve heritage, cooperate and participate in the development of their territory. In the state-managerial version, the term means the transition from a delayed response to early warning, from departmental disunity to intersectoral balance sheets, from a list of initiatives to a portfolio of measurable solutions.

What the map is not

  • It is not a system for assessing the beliefs, worldview, spirituality or loyalty of citizens.
  • It does not introduce an “awakening index” of a person or population.
  • It does not create an obligatory ideology and does not limit the cultural and ideological diversity of the peoples of Russia.
  • It does not replace state powers, budget, accounting, statistical or banking accounting.
  • It does not confer public, private or cooperative authority on a public body without a statutory procedure.

Objects of analysis: territories, conditions of development, institutions, resources, programs, projects, infrastructure, natural systems and measurable social results.

[P] 3. The image of the target state of Russia 2036

A target state is a country that is able to see relationships, identify critical imbalances in advance, coordinate decisions between levels of management and confirm the actual effect of each scalable project.

Source logicTarget logic
Reaction to consequencesEarly Signals, Scenarios and Preventive Solutions
Departmental indicatorsRelated territorial and cross-sectoral balances
List of activitiesPortfolio of projects with obligations of result
Resource developmentMeasured social, environmental and economic impact
One-time reportVerified register of data, decisions, constraints and lessons

[P] 4. The Seven Principles of the Map

  1. Man and future generations are the measure of the result. The decision is assessed through the duration and quality of life, the development of abilities and the safety of the environment.
  2. Sovereignty and legal certainty. The architecture operates only within the framework of the Constitution, legislation and the competences of the authorities.
  3. Balance before local maximization. A local benefit is not recognized as a success if it creates unacceptable damage in another sector or territory.
  4. Evidence and traceability. Each indicator has a definition, source, owner, methodology, date of update and status of verification.
  5. Warning instead of delayed response. Early identification of imbalances, scenario forecast and preventive measures are given priority.
  6. Subsidiarity and territorial adaptation. The decision is made at the minimum required level; the federal center sets compatibility and protection.
  7. Pilotability, Reversibility and Learning. The new mechanism is first tested on a limited scale and can be stopped by an independent evaluation.

[P] 5. Four layers of architecture

LayerPurposeContents
1Value-culturalMan, family, cultures of the peoples of Russia, historical memory, responsibility, solidarity, creation.
2DiagnosticVerifiable data on demographics, health, knowledge, culture, economy, infrastructure, nature and institutions.
3SoftwareIdentified gaps, scenarios, priorities, project portfolio and interagency dependencies.
4OperationAuthority, responsibility, timing, resources, data contracts, execution, monitoring and independent evaluation.

Value propositions are not portrayed as statistical facts, and indicators are not used as proof of philosophical statements. For each thesis, labeling is used: fact, calculation, hypothesis, scenario or value position.

[P/E] 6. A single development management cycle

№StageContents
1SignalThe fact, change or threat is recorded; the source and quality of the data are established.
2DiagnosticsDeviation, causal relationships and affected balances are determined.
3ScenarioThe options for action, limitations, risks and cost of inaction are compared.
4DecisionPurpose, authority, responsibility, criteria, and legal basis shall be assigned.
5CommitmentThe resource, time, control points, risk and method of confirmation are fixed.
6ImplementationCooperation is being formed and the project is being implemented in stages.
7VerificationResults and impacts are measured; both successes and negative outcomes are maintained.
8MemoryThe model version, data, decisions, constraints, and lessons return to the next cycle.

[P] 7. Nineteen contours of the national balance

Contour is not a new ministry or an additional level of power. This is an interagency area in which the decisions of several existing institutions, data, resources and territorial consequences are connected.

CodeContour
1Strategic management and sovereignty
2Population, family and human development
3Health, prevention, rehabilitation and longevity
4Education, education, personnel and talents
5Science, research and academic environment
6Culture, historical memory and sense sovereignty
7Social Connectivity, Work and Community Initiatives
8Land, agriculture and food security
9Water and hydrosphere
10Air, climate and atmospheric safety
11Ecosystems, biocenoses and biodiversity
12Energy and resource efficiency
13Industry, Materials Science and Technological Sovereignty
14Construction, housing and living environment
15Transport, logistics and spatial connectivity
16Digital infrastructure, data, AI and government registers
17Finance, investment and resource balances
18National security, resilience and threat prevention
19International, scientific and humanitarian cooperation

[П] 8. Matrix 260 and KRISTALL741

8.1. Core 260

The preliminary methodological hypothesis fixes 13 classes of system balance and 20 mandatory passport positions. Their product forms 260 positions of a single monitoring core. These are not 260 pre-approved federal KPI: specific metrics, thresholds and target values are determined after the baseline and scientific and methodological examination.

Balance classes: demography; health and vitality; education and science; culture and meanings; social and institutional ties; ecology; space; natural resources; energy; industry and technology; infrastructure and logistics; finance and economics; security and sustainability.

Passport positions: status; dynamics; standard or target corridor; territorial section; population groups; source; periodicity; owner; methodology; data quality; critical threshold; early signal; causal factors; dependent indicators; resources; current measures; deficit of measures; cost of inaction; expected effect; verification status.

8.2. KRISTALL741

Three layers: (1) observation and prediction; (2) solution and resource support; (3) execution and confirmation of the result. 741 is not the number of organizations and not symbolic arithmetic, but the project matrix of connections. For each cell, you can assign an indicator, source, data owner, authorized customer, operator, and verification method.

Taxonomy 260/741 is subject to mandatory scientific and methodological validation. If the pilot shows redundancy or incompleteness of classification, the structure must be changed without saving the number for the sake of the number.

[P] 9. Twelve strategic directions

  1. Human, family and demographic development. Saving the people, supporting the family, developing human potential.
  2. Human health, prevention and recovery. Early risk identification, rehabilitation, accessibility and quality of the health environment.
  3. Education, talents, work and personnel of the future. Continuous education, career guidance, production competences.
  4. Science, fundamental knowledge and technologies of the future. Communication of RAS, universities, industry science, engineering and pilot sites.
  5. Culture, historical memory and the image of the future. Heritage preservation archive, cultural diversity and creative identity.
  6. The unified science of natural systems. Air, water, land, biocenoses, and humans are observed as a coherent system.
  7. Land use, food and rural areas. Soil condition, water, logistics, processing, employment and quality of life.
  8. Energy, industry and materials science. Resource efficiency, technological sovereignty, and cyclical economics.
  9. Transport, construction, housing and space. Resettlement connectivity, infrastructure deficits and facility life cycle.
  10. Digital state, registers, data and trusted AI. Compatibility, data origin, explicability, and human verification.
  11. Development finance, cooperation and cross-industry balance sheets. Resource commitments, long horizon and traceable effect.
  12. Security, sustainability and international cooperation for peace. Threat prevention, system stability and mutually beneficial projects.

Each direction receives a single passport: problem, target balance, projects, territories, resources, legal basis, responsible, risks, indicators, data and confirmation method.

[P/E] 10. Designed ecosystem of execution

ElementProposed function
EQUILIBRIUM [P]Analytical Core: Observation, Causal Analysis, Scenario Modeling, Forecasting, Recommendations, and Institutional Memory.
IAC [P]Strategic expertise, institutional design and preparation of solutions for authorized customers.
SFERA [P]A single space of initiatives, participants, knowledge and feedback.
ECO-PPA [E]An experimental contractual framework for recording results, resources, timelines, risks and responsibilities.
SPECZASHCHITA [P]Author's cooperative model; specific operators and performers are determined in the prescribed manner.
KRISTALL741 [П]Ontology and addressing relationships between contours, balances and layers of control.
SUR-810 [P]Resource and balance accounting of security solutions; not a state currency, not an emission and not a payment instrument.
ESG-IR 1.0 [E]Methods of impact assessment, evidence, validation and verification.
Heritage Preservation Archive [P]Long-term memory of sources, decisions, scientific grounds, versions of models and cultural heritage.

[D/P] 11. State and Public Roles

ParticipantRole in the proposed model
President of the Russian Federation [D]Defines strategic guidelines and instructions within the constitutional powers.
Security Council [D]Assesses threats, sustainability and limitations within the competence.
Council of State [D]Ensures the coordination of regional issues and inter-commission relations in the prescribed manner.
Government and FOIA [D]Form regulatory, program, budget and industry implementation.
Entities and municipalities [D]They have territorial issues, form portfolios and ensure the execution of powers.
RAS and scientific organizations [D]Participate with the consent of the methodology, the examination of causal models and the evaluation of evidence.
RF CCI, business associations, development institutions [D]Provide a business outline, selection of competencies, expertise and scaling within their powers.
Public organizations and citizens [D]They form initiatives, feedback and socially significant criteria for the result.
Project office [E]Organizes the pilot; authority, operator and accountability are fixed by a separate decision.
Independent evaluator [E]Checks methodology, data, conflict of interest and actual effect.

It is necessary to legally separate the initiator of the concept, the state customer, the data owners, the methodological operator, the technical operator, the pilots and the independent appraiser. The appointment of operators is made by legal act, agreement or competitive procedure depending on the subject.

[D/P/E] 12. Data, registers, AI and security

The map is designed as an integration and analytical layer. The official registers, state statistics, departmental and regional systems remain primary. Duplication of data is allowed only in the presence of a legal basis, the purpose of processing and updating regulations.

RuleRequirement
OriginSource, owner, method, date, version, and transformation chain.
MinimizationOnly the data necessary for the approved pilot's target is collected.
DepersonalizationPersonal data are not used where aggregated values are sufficient.
Sharing accessThe public, service, confidential and protected levels are separated.
Human verificationAI forms probabilistic scenarios and recommendations, rather than binding decisions.
ExplanatoryThe factors, assumptions, uncertainty and limitations of the model remain.
Open interfacesDocumented data model and portability reduce vendor dependency.
VersioningNegative results and limitations remain on a par with successful ones.

[E] 13. Economic model and ECO-PPA

ECO-PPA is considered as a project contractual framework: the parties fix a socially significant result, resource obligations, control points, risk allocation, data rights and a method of independent confirmation in advance. The legal form is chosen after the examination and can be based on the existing contractual, procurement, concession, PPP, grant or cooperation mechanisms - without creating a mandatory universal contract.

Structure of the financial and economic justification

  • Development and scientific and legal examination of the methodology.
  • Inventory, cleaning, normalization and certification of data.
  • Integration with existing systems and information security.
  • Development or adaptation of software.
  • The work of pilot teams, training and support of users.
  • Implementation of specific portfolio projects.
  • Independent assessment, audit and verification.
  • Operation, updating and risk reserve on a full life cycle.

Financial, budgetary, social, environmental and technological effects are calculated separately. Payback and the cost of the prevented damage are not declared without the disclosed methodology, initial data and assumptions.

[E] 14. Regional Pilot

Candidate outline of the author's project - Syzran - Rameno - Smolkino. Its inclusion in the official pilot is possible only after confirming the territory, the legal status of the objects, the consent of the participants, the quality of the initial data and the decision of the authorized customer. An alternative format is one subject of the Russian Federation and three types of territory: urban, industrial, rural or natural.

PeriodGateResult
0-30 daysLegal and information frameworkPerimeter, participants, data, security, budget constraints.
31-60 daysBaseline and scenariosBalance sheet profile, critical gaps, 2-3 scenarios, preliminary portfolio.
61-90 daysPilot's passportKPI, resources, roles, verification method, calendar and launch decision.
4-12 monthExecution and control5-7 interrelated projects; control on 180 and 365 days.
ResultIndependent evaluationComparison of baseline and final line; decision to stop, change or scale.

Pilot Controls

  • Inter-agency coordination council;
  • Regional project office;
  • scientific and methodological council with the participation of specialized organizations;
  • Council of business and production cooperation;
  • social and expert platform;
  • Independent validation center.

[E] 15. KPI, validation and evidence

Actual objective effect targets are set after the baseline survey. At 90-day stage indicators of system readiness and quality of evidence are applied.

GroupPilot's Criterion
Passports100% priority indicators of the pilot have the definition, source, owner, method and cycle of updating.
DataAt least 90% priority sets are tested for completeness, origin and legal basis.
ProjectsEach project has a unique identifier, baseline, resource, deadline, risk and confirmation method.
ManageabilityThe time of preparation of interdepartmental analytics and approval of the decision on the baseline is measured.
ImplementationPortfolio milestones are tracked by time, resource and actual result.
BalanceImprovement of the priority effect is not accompanied by unacceptable deterioration of the associated contours.
Verification100% key conclusions have the status: confirmed, partially confirmed, not confirmed or refuted.
CirculationA reproducible standard, cost of ownership, restrictions and conditions for repetition have been prepared.

ESG-IR 1.0: five inspection objects

  1. data and their origin;
  2. calculation method and uncertainty;
  3. the actual result;
  4. impact on related balances;
  5. Conflict of interest, limitations and negative outcomes.

[P/E] 16. Road map

The first 100 days - design and pilot's permission

  • to form an interdepartmental working group and a scientific and methodological council;
  • Approve the terminology, project boundaries and statuses [D]/[P]/[E];
  • conduct legal, informational, financial and technological audit;
  • choose the territory and 2-3 inter-industry scenarios;
  • inventory programs, data, initiatives and infrastructure deficits;
  • to form a baseline, model 260/741 and safety requirements;
  • prepare a pilot’s passport, budget restrictions, KPI and the method of independent evaluation.

One year of limited testing

  • deploy a protected prototype of the analytical panel and the register of indicators;
  • implement a portfolio of 5-7 interrelated projects;
  • conduct control cycles on 90, 180 and 365;
  • pilot ECO-PPA, KRISTALL741, SUR-810 and ESG-IR 1.0 within the permitted scope;
  • submit an open and closed part of the report and an independent opinion;
  • decide to stop, adjust or replicate interregionally.

Three years - scaling only confirmed modules

  • to extend the tested model to 8-12 regions of different types;
  • approve compatible passports of balances, data and projects without duplicating state IP;
  • to form a national portfolio of cross-industry projects and a training program for teams;
  • To introduce a regular report on national and territorial balances;
  • to prepare proposals for the normative consolidation of only those mechanisms whose effectiveness and safety have been proven.

[P/E] 17. Risks and fuses

RiskFuse
Duplication of authorityThe map is positioned as support for decisions; the powers of the authorities are not changed.
IdeologizationThe assessment of citizens’ beliefs and the mandatory worldview classification are excluded.
Symbolic ArithmeticFormulas 260/741 are disclosed; numbers are changed if a methodical verification requires it.
Poor data qualitySource passports, trust levels, origin log and independent verification.
Personal dataMinimization, depersonalization, legitimate purpose, access delimitation and audit.
Dependence on supplierOpen interfaces, data portability, separation of methodological and technical operators.
Opaque fundingArticle-by-article cost of the life cycle, legal grounds and disclosure of conflict of interest.
Exaggerated effectSeparate calculation of effect types, scenario ranges and prohibition of unconfirmed promises.
Excess scaleOne limited pilot, a stage gate and the possibility of termination.
CentralizationThe federal level sets compatibility; regions retain ownership of their issues and legal powers.

[P] 18. Draft management decision

  1. Approve the concept of "Russia. Map of Awakening" as a basis for scientific, methodological and organizational study of the limited experimental architecture of coordinated development management.
  2. To establish that the projected elements do not replace the powers of public authorities and until the completion of the pilot do not acquire the status of a state information system, standard, payment or financial mechanism.
  3. Identify an authorized coordinator and form an interdepartmental working group.
  4. Within 30 days, submit options for the territory and subject of the pilot, a list of participants, data and legal grounds.
  5. Within 60 days to conduct scientific-methodical, legal, financial-economic, technological and information examination of the projected components.
  6. Within 90 days to submit the pilot's passport, base line, model 260/741, financial and economic justification, security requirements, KPI and the method of independent verification.
  7. Financing is carried out exclusively from legitimate sources on the basis of approved decisions; SUR-810 should not be used as a payment or issue instrument.
  8. At the end of 12 months to present a comparison of the initial and achieved status, an assessment of costs, effects and risks, as well as a proposal to stop, adjust or scale individual modules.

ANNEX 1

[P] Single passport initiative

№SectionMandatory content
1Problem and TerritoryFact, scale, affected groups, data source.
2Target balanceInitial condition, target corridor, date and base.
3ScriptsAction options, cost of inaction, risks and limitations.
4DecisionLegal basis, authorized customer, owner of the result.
5ProjectStages, performers, dependencies, control points.
6ResourceSource, volume, time, conditions, conflict of interest.
7DataSource, owner, methodology, frequency, quality and access.
8ResultActual value, impact on related balances.
9VerificationAppraiser, method, evidence, limitations, status.
10ScalingReproducibility, cost of ownership, conditions of repetition.

ANNEX 2

Glossary

TermWorking definition
BalanceThe observed state of an interconnected system with an allowable corridor, risks and rules of reaction.
ContourInter-agency coordination; not a new agency.
Base LineConfirmed initial state before exposure.
Indicator profileDefinition, unit, source, owner, method, period, quality, limitations and status of verification.
Proof RouteConnection of the decision with data, resource, execution, result and supporting documents.
ValidationConfirmation of the suitability of the method for the stated purpose.
VerificationCheck that the declared result is obtained and correctly measured.
Digital twinThe model of an object or territory is not a substitute for reality or an autonomous subject of a solution.

ANNEX 3

[D] Normative and methodological support

The list is used for the framework agreement of the project. A specific pilot requires a separate legal opinion, industry acts, data agreements, and a financial and economic justification.

  1. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 07.05.2024 № 309 National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2030 Year and future before 2036 Year. https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50542
  2. Federal law of 28.06.2014 № 172-FZ "On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation". https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201406300016
  3. the RF Government Decree 19.06.2026 № 761 the Unified Plan for the Achievement of National Development Goals. https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202606200017
  4. the Government of the Russian Federation 28.12.2024 № 4146-p: Spatial development strategy to 2030 the Year of Forecast 2036 years. https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202501060001
  5. the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 11.08.2025 № 2149-p: plan for the implementation of the Spatial Development Strategy. https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202508110016
  6. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 145 of 28.02.2024 "On the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation". https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50358
  7. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 18.06.2024 № 529 on priority areas of scientific and technological development and the most important science-intensive technologies. https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50755
  8. the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 09.07.2026 № 1779-p: strategic direction of digital transformation of public administration 2030 years. https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202607150016
  9. the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 02.03.2026 № 398-p: digital transformation of construction and utilities. https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202603030012
  10. Federal law of 08.12.2020 № 394-FZ "On the State Council of the Russian Federation". https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202012080064
  11. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 183 of 04.03.2013 on consideration of public initiatives directed by citizens using the Internet resource "Russian Public Initiative". https://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/36853
  12. Federal law of 21.07.2014 № 212-FZ On the Basis of Public Control in the Russian Federation. https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/38702
  13. Federal law of 27.07.2006 № 149-FZ "On Information, Information Technology and Information Protection". https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102108264
  14. Federal Law No. 27.07.2006 of 152-FZ "On Personal Data". https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102108261

[P/E] Author's methodological base

  • EQUILIBRIUM: Observation, Forecasting, Scenario Modeling and Institutional Memory.
  • SFERA: Initiative routing, participation and cooperation.
  • ECO-PPA: fixing the obligations of the result, resources, timing and risks.
  • SPECZASHCHITA: a cooperative model of execution; operators are determined by legal order.
  • KRISTALL741: addressing 19 frameworks × 13 balance classes × 3 layers.
  • SUR-810: project model of resource and balance accounting without payment or issue function.
  • ESG-IR 1.0: Experimental Evidence and Impact Assessment.
  • OAIS/PREMIS, W3C PROV, ISO/IEC 17029, ISO/IEC 17025 and NIST AI RMF/TEVV — guidelines for archiving, data origin, validation and risk management AI; Applicability is specified by profile examination.

Other published editors: Russia Rossiya_Karta_Probuzhdeniya_Strategic_Presentation.pptx · web text +

Map of Awakening

A unified outline of meanings, data, initiatives and confirmed results

Version 1.0

28 August 2026

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Waking up = management capacity

SEE • CONTACT • ACT

See

Contact

Action

state, dynamics and early signals

causes, resources, roles and territories

through the test project cycle

Ethical boundary: The map assesses the conditions and outcomes of development — not the beliefs, worldview, or "level of consciousness" of citizens.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The main reserve - the quality of connections

Strategies, competencies, initiatives and data already exist. Losses occur at the junctions.

Person

Community

Territory

Institutions

Economy

Communication transforms disparate assets into a country’s ability to address cross-industry challenges in a coherent manner.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Development begins with common sense

Person

Territory

Dignity • Health • Talent

Wednesday • Connectivity • Identity

GENERAL

BLAGO

Sovereign development

Creative

economy

Technological

Sovereignty

Resource • Work • Effect

Science • Engineering • Data

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The meaning becomes manageable through balance sheets

Not a maximum of one indicator - but the coordination of contradictions without destroying the associated contours.

Speed

reliability

Center

Territory

growth

Sustainability

Balance is a target corridor and a clear price for deviation.

Technology

person

A solution is considered to be of high quality if its effect is confirmed and does not create an unacceptable deterioration nearby.

Initiative

Responsibility

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

19 contours show the country as a whole

Strategy and

International Cooperation

Nature, Earth,

resources, energy

Man, knowledge,

culture, society

Interagency

Contours

Industry, Wednesday,

Logistics

Data, Finance,

Security

The outline is not an agency: it is an area of coordination of data, decisions, resources, and territorial implications.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Balance passport: from observation to solution

PASSPORT BALANCE

Status and Dynamics

Purpose and critical threshold

Mandatory

Passport Positions

Source and owner

Causes and dependencies

DECISION

resources and measures in place

Method of verification of the result

A single passport makes the indicator addressable: it is clear who is responsible, on what basis and how the effect will be proven.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

One signal, four decision horizons

Federation

Compatibility and national balances

Region

portfolio, resources and inter-agency coordination

Signal

Municipality

local task and feedback

Object

specific action and measurable result

The common identifier preserves the origin of the signal and the connection of decisions between levels.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The chain of evidence does not end on the project

Signal

Scenario

Address

Initiative

Project

Implementation

Calculated footprint

Validation

Versions of models come back to memory, limitations and negative results are not only successes.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The map connects - does not duplicate the state

AVAILABLE

CONTOUR

MAP

PROJECT

CONTOUR

integration • causal models • addressing • design trail • verification

strategies • powers • programs • registers • statistics

Initiatives • cooperation • resources • pilots • confirmed effect

[D] is working.

[P] Proposed

[E]The experiment

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The ecosystem closes the result cycle

IAC

[P]

SFERA

[P]

EQUILIBRIUM

[P]

ECO-PPA

[E]

KRISTALL741

[P]

CONFIRMED

RESULT

SUR-810

[P]

SPECZASHCHITA

[P]

ESG-IR 1.0

[E]

Different functions • one chain of evidence

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

EQUILIBRIUM: from signal to selection

DATA

REASONS

registers • statistics • observations

SCENARIA

Hypotheses • Dependency • Uncertainty

CHOICE

options • risks • cost of inaction

The man makes a decision

AI forms probabilistic recommendations - not mandatory management decisions.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

SFERA: from initiative to cooperation

Science

Power

INITIATIVE

Single passport

Business

Society

Territory

Competences

Outcome: roles, resources, timelines and measurable results

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

ECO-PPA and SPECZASHCHITA: Contour Execution

ECO-PPA [E]

SPECZASHCHITA [P]

fixes obligations

and result criteria

organizes the selected

Contour Execution

Result

Resource

Timeframe

Risk

Responsibility

What will change

What is provided

When we check

Who is carrying

Who is performing

The legal form is chosen after the examination and only within the limits of the current powers.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

260

260 and 741 are disclosed formulas, not symbols.

741

13 Balance classes

×

20 passport positions

19 Contours × 13 Classroom

×

3 Management Layers

Preliminary Methodological Hypothesis

Addressable cells of the project matrix

260 is not a set of approved KPI. 741 is not a number of organizations. Both taxonomys change if the test shows otherwise.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

SUR-810 and ESG-IR: protecting the value of the result

SUR-810 [P]

ESG-IR 1.0 [E]

Checks the resource security, obligations and estimated footprint.

Checks the origin of the data, methodology, effect, related balances and conflict of interest.

VALUES

solution → resource → effect

confirmed • partially •

• has not been confirmed

not currency

non-emission

no payment

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Pilot: limited and reversible

Measurable candidate author outline

Contour

Clarified

legal status

Consent of participants

Data quality

Customer's Solution

Syzran

Rameno

Smolkino

Alternative: one subject of the Russian Federation × three types of territory - urban, industrial, rural or natural.

2–3 tasks

5–7 projects

12 months

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Scaling passes through four gates

Evidence

Manageability

Performance

Reproducibility

Data and Method

roles and timelines

Effect and Balance

cost and standard

By results: stop • change • scale only confirmed modules

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Roadmap: from resolution to replication

90 days

12 months

24–36 months

Expertise

and pilot's passport

execution

and independent evaluation

Replication

Confirmed Modules

Right • Data • Security • KPI

5–7 Projects • control 180/365

8–12 Regions • Compatible Passports

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Allow 90-day expert study

FIRST DECISION

DAYS

Coordinator and Working Group

scientific and legal and technological expertise

territory, tasks, data and base line

Passport of a legally restricted pilot

Not full implementation. Scale only after independent verification.

Sources cited in presentation 9

  • Author's design architecture "Russia. Map of Awakening", version 1.0, 28.08.2026.
  • OpenAI ImageGen, image created by 28.08.2026 on the project's author's brief.
  • Federal Law No. 28.06.2014 of 172-FZ: https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201406300016
  • Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 07.05.2024 № 309: https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50542
  • Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 28.02.2024 № 145: https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50358
  • the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 28.12.2024 № 4146-r: https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202501060001
  • the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 11.08.2025 № 2149-r: https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202508110016
  • the RF Government Decree 19.06.2026 № 761: https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202606200017
  • the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 09.07.2026 № 1779-r: https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202607150016

Published files

Strategy · Full published text

19 Interconnected Balances

Source Status: Primary Document

The material combines 19 directions into a system of interrelated balances and general unification.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/svyazannye-19-balansov

Open on the site

19 Contours × 13 pair balance × 3 Levels

= 741 cells with profiles

Five states • twelve passport sections • six axes EQUILIBRIUM • five books of account • eight meaningful outputs

27 August 2026

The document specifies a single grammar of measurement and solution. It is not a rating of citizens, regions, organizations or states.

Summary for decisions

19 Object Circuits13 pair balances what limits are held3 measurement level where the effect is manifested741 Logical Cell 19 × 13 × 3
MAIN CONCLUSION Unification does not make the objectives of 19 contours identical. It makes the same identifiers, formulas, versions, evidence requirements, red limits, and decision rules.
  • 19 — subject contours of management, not a list of ministries. One department participates in several circuits; each cell has one responsible owner.
  • 13 - Invariant pairs of contradictions applied to all contours. They show what the price of the other pole skews.
  • 3 - working specification of levels: object and territory; industry and national system; interstate and global contour. This is the ×3 multiplier unification project.
  • The five states are versions of the same 741 cells. The full cycle stores up to 3 705 state records, but does not create 3 705 new balances.
  • The single average rating is forbidden: the panel shows 19 profiles, the weakest cell, red prohibitions, the quality of evidence and cascade dependencies.
  • The result with Q < 75 is not considered confirmed. Violation of the veto translates the cell into red status regardless of the average score.
SOLUTIONS FOR APPROVAL Uniform Classifier C01–C19; Couples B01–B13; Levels S1–S3; State Z0–Z4; 12-separate passport; register of interfaces and vetoes; independent scientific and evidentiary verification; locks G0–G8.

Document map and status of provisions

BlockSectionWhat the manager gets
1–3Architecture 19 / 13 / 3 / 5 / 12Terms, dimension, unit of management
4–8Register 19 contoursStocks, flows, KPI, owners, dependencies and veto
9–12Metrology and EvidenceNormalization, L/R/B/G/Q, statuses, example
13–15Inter-contour balanceMatrix 19×19, cascades, interfaces, critical nodes
16–18Institutions and solutionsRACI, Five books, 12Passport and G0–G8
19–21Effect and implementationCalculation of use, five pilots, road map
AnnexesMatrix 19×13 and data dictionaryExecutable specification for information system
StatusContents
Recorded in the basic Doctrine19 Contours; 13 steam; matrix 19×13×3; five states; 12 passport sections; L/R/B/G/Q formulas; status thresholds and vetoes
Working specification of unificationS1-S3 levels; A/S/M depth classes; interface diagram; G0 - G8; set of pilots
Illustrative modelNumerical example of balance and calculation of utility in conventional units; is not an actual estimate of Russia, region or agency
BORDER OF INTERPRETATION The document describes the architecture. Real target corridors and actual values should be approved separately after the baseline measurement, legal expertise and independent reconciliation.

1. Grammar of a single system

A single model draws the subject of management, the criterion of equilibrium, the scale of manifestation of the result, the state of evidence and the form of management decision. This eliminates the main error of departmental accounting - an attempt to put money, physical output and public benefit into one indicator.

ElementQuestionNot
19 contours CWhat exactly is reproduced and managedNot a list of ministries
13 Balances BBetween which poles the result is heldNot independent ratings
3 Level SWhere results, limitations and externalities occurNot the number of states
5 states of ZHow confirmation changes in timeNo additional multiplier
12 sections of passportHow the initiative is described and implementedNot 12 KPI
6 Axes EQUILIBRIUMWhat properties of the system are checkedNot replacing subject KPI
5 books of accountHow to avoid double counting of resources and benefitsNot five budgets.
8 meaningsFor what social ability to create an exitNot slogans and not a new multiplier
FORMULA U(z) = C₁₉ ⊗ B₁₃ ⊗ S₃; |U| = 741. The z state is the cell version. With five images, the storage contains up to 741 × 5 = 3 705 Records.

One circuit contains 13 × 3 = 39 Logical cells. One level contains 19 × 13 = 247 cells. The system remains manageable only with a single dictionary and machine-readable identifiers.

2. Control unit — certified cell

The cell answers three questions at the same time: what is controlled, what contradiction is held, and at what level the result manifests itself. It doesn’t just keep the score; it keeps the path from the norm to the solution.

Record BlockMandatory content
Keyperiod + scenario + state + scale_id + contour_id + balance_id
Norm and facttarget corridor T; fact F; deviation Δ; version of the technique
Calculationstandardized indicators; weights; L; R; B; G; Quality Q
Limitationveto; minimum need; critical dependence; allowable lag
ReasonProven causal hypothesis and affected stock/flow
Responsibilityone decision owner; data owner; independent verifier
Actiondecision; term; gateway; GO / REDESIGN / HOLD / STOP
Evidenceprimary source identifier; traceability; act of reconciliation
CELL VECTOR x(c,b,s,z) = ⟨T, F, Δ, L, R, B, G, Q, V, Cause, Owner, Decision, Deadline, Evidence⟩.
  • Old value is not overwritten: ΔB(z) = B(z) − B(z−1).
  • Resetting the anchors of the rationing after receiving the fact requires a new version of the technique.
  • Each measure specifies the stock to be created, the flux to be changed, the commitment to be made, and a minimum of two adjacent limiting circuits.
  • There are no empty cells: with a weak evidence base, the monitoring class M is used and Q is fixed.

3. Three levels and five states

DRAFT UNIFICATION OF THE MULTILATER ×3 The basic Doctrine records three levels, but does not detail them. Here is the working specification S1–S3, Separating local fact, national intersectoral balance and external effects.
CodeLevelObjectThe main proof
S1Object-territorialperson, family, organization, facility, municipality, pilotprimary observations, registers and measurements at the facility
S2Industry and Nationalindustry, regional system, federal program, cross-industry complexsummary balance sheets, interagency reconciliation, tables "costs-output"
S3Inter-State and globalCountries, cross-border systems, markets, standards and externalitiescomparable statistics, contracts and independent verification

Countries — Russia, China, the United States and others — are the analytical section of the S level3, Not the meaning of multiplier ×3. Levels are needed to detect benefit and damage transfer: a locally beneficial solution can create an industry deficit or cross-border external cost.

Figure 1. The five states are versions of 741 cells, not new balances.

CodeStateWhat is storedRule
Z0Originalbase line, limitations, quality of sourcesTransition to evidence only
Z1Prognosticresult model, cost, uncertainty rangeTransition to evidence only
Z2After the pilotFact, forecast, fact, side effectsTransition to evidence only
Z3Independently ConfirmedResults after external verification of evidenceTransition to evidence only
Z4Operatingsteady result, TCO, reproducibilityTransition to evidence only

4. Register 19 contours: navigation

ModuleNameKonturovComposition
M1Man and cultural reproduction4C01 Demography; C02 Health; C03 Education; C04 Culture
M2Knowledge, production and basic support4C05 Science; C06 Industry; C07 Energy; C08 Food
M3Nature, territory and infrastructure4C09 Water; C10 Ecology; C11 Territory; C12 Transport
M4Economy, coordination and sustainability5C13 Data and AI; C14 Finance; C15 Work and business; C16 Management; C17 Continuity
M5External and long horizon2C18 Cooperation; C19 Long horizon
The rule of power is not equal to the office. Ministries, regions, RAS, business and public institutions can be co-owners of the process, but each cell has one decision owner, one data owner and one independent verifier.
CodeContourVerified resultKey connections
C01People and demographySustainable reproduction of healthy and prosperous populationC02, C03, C08, C11, C14
C02Health and rehabilitationReducing the burden of disease and restoring human functionC01, C03, C05, C06, C08
C03Education and talentsCompetencies are in line with development objectives, talents are revealedC01, C04, C05, C06, C13
C04Culture and heritageContinuity of cultural memory in creative renewalC01, C03, C11, C13, C18
C05Science and technologyIndependently confirmed technologies are brought to useC03, C06, C07, C13, C14
C06Industry and materialsReliable complete production chainsC05, C07, C10, C12, C13
C07EnergyContinuous, affordable and resource-efficient energyC05, C06, C09, C10, C11
C08Food and agricultureAffordable safe food without depleting the natural baseC01, C02, C05, C09, C10
C09Water and hydrosphereReliable water supply within the pool reproducibilityC07, C08, C10, C11, C12
C10Ecology and biodiversityEconomic activity remains within the permissible loadC06, C07, C08, C09, C11
C11Territory, cities and resettlementA connected system of secure settlements with equal basic accessC01, C07, C09, C10, C12
C12Transport and logisticsAvailable continuous corridors with predictable delivery timeC06, C07, C08, C09, C11
C13Digital environment, data and AIA compatible, sovereign and secure digital environment under human controlC02, C03, C05, C06, C07
C14Finance and investmentReproduction financing at an acceptable price and riskC05, C06, C07, C08, C11
C15Labour, entrepreneurship and cooperationProductive work, fair results and sustainable cooperationC01, C03, C05, C06, C08
C16Governance, law and trustPredictable, responsible and contested governanceC01, C03, C11, C13, C14
C17Safety and ContinuityAcceptable risk and restoration of critical functions within a given periodC02, C06, C07, C08, C09
C18International cooperationEqual Diversified Projects with Mutual BenefitC04, C05, C06, C07, C09
C19The Long HorizonThe choice of future generations and readiness for big challenges are preservedC01, C04, C05, C07, C09

The full passport of each circuit is given below. The link list does not replace 19×19 matrix of physical and institutional flows.

4. Module M1: Human and cultural reproduction

The module combines 4 contours for navigation. The boundaries of the module do not cancel external dependencies and do not create a separate departmental perimeter.

C01 People and demography

StockPopulation, healthy years of life, family and human capitalStreamBirths, deaths, migration, family creation, mobility
ReproductionHealth + housing + income + care + cultural environmentVerified resultSustainable reproduction of healthy and prosperous population
Core KPIfertility; healthy life; natural and migration growth; family poverty; access to servicesConnectionsC02, C03, C08, C11, C14, C15, C16
Owner / participantsSocial and demographic policies; statistics; regionsThemesReproduction; Trust; Development
The hard vetoGrowth of preventable mortality; sustainable depopulation; inaccessibility of vital servicesAnchor PairsB02, B06, B07, B13

C02 Health and rehabilitation

StockPublic health, personnel, medicine, medicines and rehabilitation facilitiesStreamPrevention → Diagnostics → treatment → Rehabilitation → surveillance
ReproductionPersonnel, pharmaceuticals, prevention and restoration of functionVerified resultReducing the burden of disease and restoring human function
Core KPIpreventable mortality; prevention coverage; waiting time; personnel and medicines; restored functionConnectionsC01, C03, C05, C06, C08, C13, C17
Owner / participantsHealthcare; insurance funds; medical organizations; scientific centersThemesReproduction; Security; Trust
The hard vetoThreat to patient safety; failure of critical infrastructure; shortage of drugsAnchor PairsB01, B02, B07, B10, B11

C03 Education and talents

StockCompetences, teachers, schools, universities, engineering schools and personnel reserveStreamTraining → rating → retraining → transition to work and science
ReproductionTeaching schools, mentoring and continuing educationVerified resultCompetencies are in line with development objectives, talents are revealed
Core KPIfunctional literacy; completion of programs; employment; personnel shortage; continuing educationConnectionsC01, C04, C05, C06, C13, C15, C19
Owner / participantsEducation; universities; employers; employment centresThemesReproduction; Optionality; Development
The hard vetoLoss of basic literacy; critical shortage of teachers; mass gap is difficultAnchor PairsB02, B06, B07, B11, B12

C04 Culture and heritage

StockLanguage, Historical Memory, Archives, Heritage and Cultural CompetencesStreamCreation → Preservation → Restoration → Transmission → Access
ReproductionArchives, schools, cultural institutions and intergenerational transmissionVerified resultContinuity of cultural memory in creative renewal
Core KPIsafety of funds; accessibility; participation; digitization; significant contentConnectionsC01, C03, C11, C13, C18, C19
Owner / participantsCulture; archives; museums; libraries; institutes of language and historyThemesSovereignty; Reproduction; Trust
The hard vetoIrreversible loss of heritage or archival foundation; transfer breakAnchor PairsB02, B05, B06, B11, B12

5. Module M2: Knowledge, production and basic support

The module combines 4 contours for navigation. The boundaries of the module do not cancel external dependencies and do not create a separate departmental perimeter.

C05 Science and Technology

StockResearchers, knowledge, infrastructure, intellectual property, experimental baseStreamResearch → R&D → Test → Certification → Implementation
ReproductionScientific schools, instrument base, open inspection and order for implementationVerified resultIndependently confirmed technologies are brought to use
Core KPIR&D personnel and costs; lead-time; successful trials; implementation rate; reproducibilityConnectionsC03, C06, C07, C13, C14, C18, C19
Owner / participantsRAS; universities; Research Institutes; Metrology; Technology CompaniesThemesSovereignty; Optionality; Development
The hard vetoImplementation without safety check; non-reproducibility; loss of critical schoolAnchor PairsB01, B05, B06, B09, B10

C06 Industry and materials

StockCapacities, equipment, materials, technological competences and repair baseStreamRaw materials → material → Component → Product → Service → Repeated cycle
ReproductionInvestments, orders, standards, repairs and trainingVerified resultReliable complete production chains
Core KPIlocalization of critical chains; capacity readiness; performance; delivery time; defectConnectionsC05, C07, C10, C12, C13, C14, C15, C17, C18
Owner / participantsIndustrial policy; corporations and SMEs; standardization; supervisionThemesSovereignty; Development; Security
The hard vetoOne unprotected supplier; industry safety violation; no repair or materialAnchor PairsB01, B04, B05, B08, B09, B10

C07 Energy

StockGeneration, networks, storage, fuel reserves and repair capacitiesStreamProduction → Transmission → Storage → Consumption → Update
ReproductionRepairs, reservists, fuel cycle and long investmentsVerified resultContinuous, affordable and resource-efficient energy
Core KPIpower reserve; frequency and duration of outages; energy intensity; network losses; reserve autonomyConnectionsC05, C06, C09, C10, C11, C12, C14, C17, C18
Owner / participantsEnergy; system and network operators; technical supervisionThemesSovereignty; Sustainability; Security
The hard vetoReservation broken; risk of major accident; no fuel or emergency power supplyAnchor PairsB01, B04, B05, B06, B10

C08 Food and agriculture

StockSoils, genetic resources, herds, seeds, capacities and storageStreamProduction → processing → storage → distribution → soil replenishment
ReproductionSelection, soil protection, water, energy and agricultural personnelVerified resultAffordable safe food without depleting the natural base
Core KPIself-sufficiency; affordability; crop sustainability; soil condition; food lossConnectionsC01, C02, C05, C09, C10, C11, C12, C14, C15, C17
Owner / participantsAgriculture; agricultural science; cooperatives; food supervisionThemesReproduction; Sustainability; Security
The hard vetoHazardous pollution; critical dependence on seeds; irreversible soil degradationAnchor PairsB01, B03, B04, B07, B10, B13

6. Module M3: Nature, Territory and Infrastructure

The module combines 4 contours for navigation. The boundaries of the module do not cancel external dependencies and do not create a separate departmental perimeter.

C09 Water and hydrosphere

StockFresh water, water ecosystems, networks, treatment and hydrotechnical facilitiesStreamFence → preparation → use → cleaning → return and replenishment
ReproductionBasin management, cleaning, network repair and environmental runoffVerified resultReliable water supply within the pool reproducibility
Core KPIquality of drinking water; network losses; resource fence; wastewater treatment; ecological runoffConnectionsC07, C08, C10, C11, C12, C13, C17, C19
Owner / participantsWater bodies; utilities; supervision; hydrometeorologyThemesReproduction; Sustainability; Common goods
The hard vetoToxic pollution; fence above reproducible level; emergency hydraulic systemAnchor PairsB01, B03, B04, B06, B07

C10 Ecology and biodiversity

StockNatural capital, species, habitats, forests, soils and resilienceStreamWithdrawal → Load → Emissions → monitoring → Recovery
ReproductionProtection, restoration, clean technology and independent monitoringVerified resultEconomic activity remains within the permissible load
Core KPIemissions and discharges; key species; conserved ecosystems; recycling; accumulated damageConnectionsC06, C07, C08, C09, C11, C17, C18, C19
Owner / participantsEnvironmental authorities; scientific institutes; regions; public monitoringThemesSustainability; Security; Common goods
The hard vetoIrreversible loss of species or habitat; hazardous pollution threshold; concealment of damageAnchor PairsB01, B03, B04, B06, B07, B13

C11 Territory, cities and settlement

StockHousing, communal and social infrastructure, spaces and natural frameworkStreamConstruction → Service → Update → Migration → Services
ReproductionInfrastructure repairs, planning, land and local financeVerified resultA connected system of secure settlements with equal basic access
Core KPIhousing and network accidents; availability of services; travel time; infrastructure debt; territorial gapConnectionsC01, C07, C09, C10, C12, C14, C15, C16, C17
Owner / participantsSpatial planning; regions; municipalities; public utilitiesThemesReproduction; Sustainability; Common goods
The hard vetoConstruction at risk; growth of emergency fund; development without infrastructureAnchor PairsB02, B03, B04, B07, B13

C12 Transport and logistics

StockRoads, railways, ports, fleets, rolling stock, hubs and warehousesStreamMovement of passengers and cargo → service → update
ReproductionRepair, backup routes, park and traffic safetyVerified resultAvailable continuous corridors with predictable delivery time
Core KPItime and reliability; capacity reserve; logistics costs; availability; mortalityConnectionsC06, C07, C08, C09, C11, C13, C14, C17, C18
Owner / participantsTransport; infrastructure operators; carriers; customs servicesThemesSovereignty; Sustainability; Development
The hard vetoNo alternative route of critical cargo; security breach; corridor ruptureAnchor PairsB01, B03, B04, B05, B10, B13

7. Module M4: Economics, Coordination and Sustainability

The module combines 5 contours for navigation. The boundaries of the module do not cancel external dependencies and do not create a separate departmental perimeter.

C13 Digital environment, data and AI

StockTrusted data, computing and network infrastructure, models and competenciesStreamCollection → verification → exchange → analysis → solution → update
ReproductionData Standards, Open Interfaces, Cyber Protection and Model AuditVerified resultA compatible, sovereign and secure digital environment under human control
Core KPIcompleteness and relevance; interoperability; availability and recovery; model audit; critical incidentsConnectionsC02, C03, C05, C06, C07, C09, C12, C14, C16, C17, C18
Owner / participantsDigital policy; registry owners; cybersecurity; independent auditThemesSovereignty; Optionality; Trust
The hard vetoLoss of human control; unverified AI; data compromise; dependence without replacementAnchor PairsB01, B02, B05, B07, B10, B11

C14 Finance and investments

StockSavings, capital, reserves, payment infrastructure and long resourcesStreamRevenues → taxes → loan → investments → payments → capital return
ReproductionSavings, long funding, budget and risk managementVerified resultReproduction financing at an acceptable price and risk
Core KPIinvestments; share of long financing; cost of capital; debt burden; TCO resultsConnectionsC05, C06, C07, C08, C11, C12, C13, C15, C16, C18, C19
Owner / participantsFinancial and economic bodies; treasury; regulators; banks; auditThemesSovereignty; Optionality; Sustainability
The hard vetoHidden liabilities; timing mismatch; debt without result; risk of payment sustainabilityAnchor PairsB01, B03, B05, B06, B07, B08, B09

C15 Labour, entrepreneurship and cooperation

StockQualifications, jobs, businesses, networks and work cultureStreamHiring → labor → training → creation and growth of enterprises → contracting
ReproductionSkills, Fair Pay, Business Environment and ConsortiumsVerified resultProductive work, fair results and sustainable cooperation
Core KPIproductivity; median real pay; personnel gap; survival of SMEs; consortium effectConnectionsC01, C03, C05, C06, C08, C11, C13, C14, C16
Owner / participantsLabor and economy; employment; employers; trade unions; business associationsThemesReproduction; Trust; Development
The hard vetoThreat to the life of an employee; debt; unfair contracting; displacement without transitionAnchor PairsB02, B03, B07, B08, B09, B13

C16 Governance, law and trust

StockLegal certainty, competence, trust and registers of obligationsStreamDecision → service → execution → control → appeal → adjustment
ReproductionAccountability, competence, feedback and enforcementVerified resultPredictable, responsible and contested governance
Core KPItime and quality of service; execution of decisions; appeal and cancellation; audit closure; trustConnectionsC01, C03, C11, C13, C14, C15, C17, C18
Owner / participantsAuthorities; Parliament; Court; Control and Audit; OmbudsmenThemesSovereignty; Trust; Common goods
The hard vetoNo responsible or right of appeal; conflict of interest; concealment; systemic non-performanceAnchor PairsB01, B02, B03, B05, B07, B11

C17 Security and Continuity

StockReserves, Duplicate Capacity, Recovery Plans, Teams and Secure InfrastructureStreamSurveillance → Warning → Response → Recovery → Exercise
ReproductionReservation, training, insurance and independent verificationVerified resultAcceptable risk and restoration of critical functions within a given period
Core KPIcritical events; time of detection and recovery; autonomy of reserves; RTO/RPO; result of the exercisesConnectionsC02, C06, C07, C08, C09, C10, C11, C12, C13, C16, C18
Owner / participantsSecurity and emergencies; operators of critical infrastructure; regulators; auditThemesSovereignty; Sustainability; Security
The hard vetoNo backup, copy or plan; known critical vulnerability; learning failureAnchor PairsB01, B03, B05, B06, B10, B11

8. Module M5: External and long horizon

The module combines 2 contours for navigation. The boundaries of the module do not cancel external dependencies and do not create a separate departmental perimeter.

C18 International Cooperation

StockContracts, trust of partners, joint capacities, corridors and standardsStreamTrade → investment → research → data exchange and competences
ReproductionMutual recognition, joint projects, diversification and risk sharingVerified resultEqual Diversified Projects with Mutual Benefit
Core KPIconcentration of partners; execution of projects; recognition of standards; reliability of corridors; local value addedConnectionsC04, C05, C06, C07, C09, C10, C12, C13, C14, C16, C17, C19
Owner / participantsForeign and economic policy; development banks; standardization; consortiaThemesSovereignty; Optionality; Development
The hard vetoUnilateral critical dependence; loss of control; undistributed sanctions riskAnchor PairsB01, B04, B05, B07, B09, B13

C19 Long horizon

StockStrategic options, fundamental knowledge, observations, ocean, space and climate infrastructureStreamForsyth → observation → experiment → mission → redundancy capabilities
ReproductionLong-term funding, science schools, scenarios and intergenerational controlVerified resultThe choice of future generations and readiness for big challenges are preserved
Core KPIProgram >10 years; portfolio of options; scenarios and stress tests; continuity of observations; intergenerational commitmentsConnectionsC01, C04, C05, C07, C09, C10, C13, C14, C17, C18
Owner / participantsStrategic planning; RAS and Universities; Ocean, Space, Climate; ParliamentThemesOptionality; Sustainability; Common goods
The hard vetoIrreversible damage; single-scenario lock; unfunded liability; loss of sightAnchor PairsB01, B04, B05, B06, B10, B12

9. Thirteen invariant balance pairs

Each pair is applied to each of the 19 contours on three levels. Anchor Class A requires a complete set of KPI and a target corridor; substantial S requires causal verification; and monitoring M requires a reduced set with explicit Q. The class sets the depth of the analysis, not the evaluation of the result.

CodeCoupleRisk of left-handednessRisk of Right DistortionExample of a veto
B01Security - DevelopmentFreezing development for protectionGrowth without reserves and protectionUnacceptable risk of life or continuity
B02Man is a statePaternalism and suppression of subjectivityRemoval of public liabilityDecision without human rights and appeal
B03Center - regionsUnification without the context of the territoryFragmentation of norms and resourcesUnfulfilled commitment to power
B04Nature — technosphereProhibition of development without evaluation of alternativesIrreversible depletion of natural capitalExceeding the environmental limit
B05Sovereignty — OpennessIsolation and loss of exchangeCritical external dependenceNo managed alternative to critical resource
B06Present - futureDeferred well-being with no result nowStocks and future opportunitiesUnfunded or irreversible obligation
B07Efficiency — fairnessEquality without productivityEfficiency through exclusion of groupsInaccessibility of the base result
B08Labor - CapitalWeak investment and technological renewalRent without growth of real labor and incomeThreat to the life of the employee or non-payment
B09Competition - cooperationDuplication and price warCartel and closure of the entranceMonopolization of the critical chain
B10Innovation - reliabilityTechnological backlogScaling an unverified solutionNo safety and recovery tests
B11Digital efficiency — human sovereigntyManual system without observationAutomation without control and explanationCritical solution without human control
B12Tradition - UpdatePreservation of broken standardsMemory and continuity gapIrreversible loss of heritage or knowledge
B13Agglomeration growth - spatial connectivitySpraying resources without growth nodesConcentration with territorial exceptionBasic services are not available in parts of the territory
The weight of one indicator does not exceed 15%; the weight of the semantic unit is 35%. A high score of one pole should not compensate for the failure of the other.

10. Normalization and calculation L/R/B/G

Normalization begins before observing the fact. For each indicator, five anchors are approved: 0 - critical condition; 40 - warning; 60 - acceptable; 80 - strategic goal; 100 - the best sustainable achievable level. A piecewise linear interpolation is used between the anchors.

NORMALISATION N(x) = yₖ + (yₖ₊₁−yₖ) × (x−aₖ)/(aₖ₊₁−aₖ), bounded to 0–100. For indicators where “less is better”, the anchors run in descending order.
MetricsFormulaMeaning
Pole LL = 100 × exp[Σ wᵢ ln(max(Nᵢ,1)/100)]geometric mean; Σw=1; wᵢ≤0,15
Pole RCalculated symmetricallythe same weights and evidence requirements
Balance BB = 0,7 × 2LR/(L+R) + 0,3 × min(L,R)harmony + fine for weak pole
Gap GG = |L−R|shows a bias even at a high average
Equilibrium EE = (A₁×A₂×…×A₆)^(1/6)six axes; the weak axis does not hide
Recovery timeNInterpretation
72 h0critical condition
48 h40Warning
24 h60Acceptable
12 h80strategic objective
6 h100the Best Sustainable Level
18 h70Linear interpolation between 24 and 12 Hours

Illustration. Specific anchors are approved separately for each critical service and level.

11. Quality of evidence, statuses and veto

QUALITY Q Q = 0,30·Completeness + 0,25·relevance + 0,25·Traceability + 0,20·independent verification. With Q < 75 result not confirmed.
StatusConditionAction
GreenB≥80; L and R≥70; G≤15; Q≥85; No vetoResults confirmed and balanced
YellowOther cases between red and greenNeed a correction of the weak pole or evidence
RedB<50; or min(L,R)<45; or G>30; or vetoSolution / stop / interagency intervention
Red - not confirmedQ<75Can not be counted as achieved output
  • The key KPI below 50 prohibits green status.
  • A critical mandatory cell below 65 prohibits the green status of the entire system.
  • One of the 13 steam below 35 or three pairs below 50 the Contour Card × level” requires an interdepartmental solution.
  • The missing critical interface between the contours is a veto and is not offset by an average score.
  • Status priority: Veto → red → yellow → green.
NOT A SINGLE RATING For each contour are shown P, min B, 10percentile, number of red and unconfirmed cells, coverage of evidence, and ΔB. For the whole system are shown 19 Profiles and the veto register.

12. Numerical example of one cell

Figure 2. The pilot has reduced the gap, but the green status has not yet been achieved. All numbers are illustrative.

StateLRBGEvidenceStatus
Before the pilot76,2064,2068,0412,00Q=89,35Yellow
After the pilot76,2072,6273,843,58Q≥85Yellow
Change0,00+8,42+5,80−8,42—Coherence has improved

Why Yellow: The evidence is qualitative and the gap is already small, but the final B is below 80. The system does not declare success before reaching both poles.

ComponentValueInterpretation
P73,61achieved level of bound contours
H93,95Horizontal alignment of contours
V92,00vertical level matching
T71,67temporary synchronization
K83,72Interface compatibility
S_eff79,240,7·GM(P,H,V,T,K)+0,3·min; weak link T

Illustrative example. The synchronization index is not translated into money without a counter-actual scenario.

13. Intercontour balance: two matrices, one key

Do not mix flow matrix A(19×19) the U Assessment Tensor(19×13×3). The first answers "who transmits a resource, ability or limitation to whom", the second - "how each contour holds 13 “Pairs on three levels.” They are connected by a single identifier of the outline and script.

ObjectDimensionWhat it describesRequired fields
A(19×19)supplier i → recipient jresource, energy, water, labor, data, law, external effectpower, need, fact, reserve, loss, RTO
U(19×13×3)contour c × balance b × level sL, R, B, G, Q, vetopurpose, fact, reason, owner, decision, deadline, proof
Connection Keyperiod + scenario + state + scale_id + contour_idUnified version of classifiersTraceability from budget to meaning
RESOURCE EQUATION S(r,t−1)+P(r,t)+I(r,t)=Σⱼx(rj,t)+F(r,t)+ΔS(r,t)+L(r,t). Stock + reproduction + inflow = intermediate and final use + change in stock + losses.
CRITICAL COVERAGE κ(j,r) = available resource taking into account the reserve and replacement / minimum need of the contour. At κ<1 — Red status regardless of average.
Type of communicationObject
Resourcemoney, energy, water, materials, labor
Reproductionpersonnel, health, knowledge, infrastructure
Restrictiveenvironmental, legal or safety limit
Informationdata, model, identifier, standard
External effectbenefit or damage outside the contour and budget perimeter

14. Connectivity map and critical nodes

Figure 3. Modules are needed for navigation; real flows cross their boundaries.

Figure 4. Priority in the pilot is given to nodes with high connectivity, low substitution and short RTO.

NodeWhy CriticalTypical Cascade Lag
07 Energyfeeds water, communication, industry, transport and citiesminutes/hour
09 Waterlocally almost indispensable; human, nutrition, energy, ecologyhours/days
12 TransportSpatial Bridge of Material Flowsdays/weeks
13 Data and AIcoordination of finance, transport, management and securitySeconds/hours
16 Management and lawowners, rights, priorities, conflicts and appealsdays/months
03 Educationreproduces the competences of all specialized contours3–15 years

Lags are quality ranges for stress test design, not regulatory recovery times.

15. Cascade risks and fuses

Launch failureChainFinal damageFuse
Energetic07 → 13/09/12 → 02/08/06 → 01/15basic services, production, incomemicrogrids; autonomy; manual control
Water-climatic19/10 → 09 → 08/02/06/07 → 01food, sanitation, power stopbasin limits; reuse; stocks
Digital / Cyber13 → 14/16/12/07 → 17 → 01/04calculations, coordination, trustsegmentation; offline contours; independent reconciliation
Logistic / External18/17 → 12 → 06/08/07 → 14/15components, inflation, employmentalternative routes; critical stocks
Demographic01 → 03 → 02/05/06/13 → 15 → 14 → 01personnel, services, technologies, budgetrehabilitation; retraining; automation under control
Institutional04/16 → 14/18/13 → 05/06/11 → 15/01Investment and legitimacyright of appeal; one owner; open evidence
Environmental10 → 09/08 → 02/01 → 11/16health, migration, conflict of resourcessource stop; standby water intakes; monitoring
The pilot must check not only the average result, but also the failure of the critical supplier, the delay of data, going beyond the environmental limit, the absence of the owner and exceeding RTO. Scaling is prohibited if the fuse exists only on paper.

16. Five books of one account

The same resource cannot be considered both an expense, an issue and a public benefit. The five books are connected by traceable bridges, but retain different units and double counting rules.

BookContentsUnitControl of double account
1. Fiscal entranceappropriations, taxes, purchasesMoney/% of GDPDo not mix budget perimeters
2. Financial balanceLoans, guarantees, assets and liabilitiesstock, flow, risk, termLoan and guarantee are not equal to cost
3. Intersectoral flowgoods, services, imports, value addedZ, A, L=(I−A)⁻¹Do not add output and added value
4. Physical resultpower, availability, quality, recoverynatural outlet-KPICash register does not prove the result
5. The Meaningful ExitEight public abilitiesIndependent KPI 0–100Do not attribute causality without evaluation
END-TO-END BRIDGE m = H · Q · (I−A)⁻¹ · G · b − r: the budget impulse b passes through the departmental-sectoral bridge G, the intersectoral multiplier, the outcome coefficients Q and the meaning map H; risks and coordination costs r are subtracted.
№Axle EQUILIBRIUMRole
1Reservesrequired profile 0–100
2Streamsrequired profile 0–100
3Reproductionrequired profile 0–100
4Resiliencerequired profile 0–100
5Legalityrequired profile 0–100
6External effectsrequired profile 0–100

E = (A₁×A₂×…×A₆)^(1/6). The geometric mean does not allow a strong axis to conceal completely the failure of a weak one.

№MeaningRule
1Sovereigntymeasurable public output; no more than three main tags per initiative
2Reproductionmeasurable public output; no more than three main tags per initiative
3Optionalitymeasurable public output; no more than three main tags per initiative
4Resiliencemeasurable public output; no more than three main tags per initiative
5Trustmeasurable public output; no more than three main tags per initiative
6Developmentmeasurable public output; no more than three main tags per initiative
7Securitymeasurable public output; no more than three main tags per initiative
8Common goodsmeasurable public output; no more than three main tags per initiative

17. Passport of 12 sections

№SectionMandatory content
1Identificationoutline code, initiative, territory, level, owner, version
2Issue addressedDeficiency, Causal Hypothesis, Affected Groups
3Base LineZ0, sources, boundaries and data limitations
4Target resultcorridor, period, allowable deviation
5Matrix 13 Balances13 × 3 cells, classes A/S/M, red limits
6Technology and organizationmechanism for changing stocks and flows
7Legal regimepowers, restrictions, procedure for appeal
8FinanceCAPEX, OPEX, TCO, source of funds, liabilities
9Planstages, dependencies, control points
10KPI and evidenceformulas, sources, periodicity, independent reconciliation
11Risksred bans, side effects, recovery
12Decision on fateGO, REDESIGN, HOLD or STOP
SECTION 5 — NUCLEAR Matrix 13 Balances are divided into three levels: 39 A cell for one initiative. Each cell is assigned an A/S/M class, target corridor, fact, Q, veto, and solution.
VerificationMandatory question
StockWhat asset, ability or natural capital is created/spent?
StreamWhat physical, financial, labor, information or legal flow is changing?
CommitmentWhich OPEX, repair, debt, law or future liability arise?
Neighbouring circuitsWhat are the minimum two contours that limit the result and get an external effect?
EvidenceWho is the owner of the data, what is the method and who performed an independent reconciliation?
FateWhat decision has been made and what fact will open the next gateway?

18. Institutional architecture and RACI

FunctionInstitutionsResponsibility
Strategic objectivePresident / Security Councilmandate, priority, inter-system constraints
Resources and performanceGovernmentportfolio, budget, interagency execution
Federal-regional connectionCouncil of State; regions; municipalitiesscaling, territorial data, operation
Law and controlFederal Assembly; supervisory and judicial institutionslaw, public control, appeal
Scientific ValidityRAS, universities and scientific organizationsmethodology, reproducibility, independent examination
Production and investmentBusiness, consortia, development institutionscapital, technology, supply, TCO
FeedbackProfessional and public associationsavailability of the result, side effects, trust
ProcessR - PerformsA - RespondsC - CounselingI is informed
Methodology and anchorsRAS / Scientific ValidatorGovernmentowners of contours, statisticsAudit and public
Primary dataData Ownerowner of the contourstatistics, region, operatorScientific Validator
FinancingFinancial ownerGovernmentcontour, audit, development institutionsPublic control
PilotRegion / Operatorowner of the contourscience, business, recipientsGovernment
Independent verificationexternal validator / auditowner of evidenceRAS, statistics, public expertsThe Decisive Body
GO / STOPthe Portfolio Authoritymandated bodyowners, law, finance, scienceall participants
The official outline uses functions: data and models, participation, agreements and resources, execution, decision support, independent validation. Author brands can be prototypes, but are not declared by official bodies or exclusive operators.

19. The nine gates of solution G0-G8

GatewayNameCondition of passage
G0Mandatetask, boundaries, owner and acceptable risk
G1Profile12 sections filled; communications and vetoes defined
G2Base LineZ0; anchors; Q; independent verification
G3Alternatives1 / 3 / 6 scenarios; weak link and external effects
G4Law and Financepowers; CAPEX/OPEX/TCO; obligations and appeal
G5Pilotcomparison design; control; stop conditions; RTO
G6Fact and evidenceZ2/Z3; forecast-fact; Q; side effects
G7Scalingreproducibility; interfaces; stress test; operational readiness
G8Strategic OutcomeZ4; meaning output; long audit and correction
DecisionActionBasis
GOTransition to the next gatewayThere is no veto; Q is sufficient; weak link improves
REDESIGNRedesign and repeatthe mechanism is incorrect, but the problem and value are confirmed
HOLDSuspendneed data, right, resource or external interface
STOPStopHarm, irreproducible, unacceptable risk or adverse effect
CYCLE Watch → check profile → Diagnose the causes → Comparing alternatives 1/3/6 years → Choose an option that improves the weak link → Pilot → forecast/fact/TCO/side effects → solution → Annual audit and stress test.

20. The benefits of unification: how to count, without promising the effect in advance

MONEY EFFECT NPV(sync) = Σₜ [LossAvoided + CostSaved + OutputAdded + OptionValue − IntegrationCost]ₜ /(1+r)ᵗ. The synchronization index itself is not translated into money.
ComponentCalculationConfirmation
Duplicate accountingRemoved Packages × Watches × Total cost of an hourfinancial owner + audit
Delayed decisionshortened days × flow delay costowner of process + counterfactual scenario
Prevented damageΔProbability × Amount of lossRisk-Owner + Independent Model
Additional outputphysical increase × verified value addedoperator + statistics / rating
Optional valueCost of saved alternative for scenariosscientific validator + financial owner
Cost of the systemintegration + operation + audit + trainingTreasury / TCO
ArticleAssumptionConditional units
Savings on reporting19 × 8 Packages × 120 h × 2 Duplication = 36 480 h20,3 FTE-year × 100 = 2 027
Acceleration of solutions40 decisions × 20 days × 2 Unit/day1 600
Reduction of expected damage1 000 → 700300
Additional outputthe Confirmed Pilot700
Integration and launchdata, interfaces, audit, training−900
Net benefit of the first year2 027 + 1 600 + 300 + 700 − 9003 727
Recurring at OPEX 4502 027 + 1 600 + 300 + 700 − 4504 177

Illustrative scenario, not an estimate of actual costs. 1 FTE-year accepted as equal 1 800 Hours and 100 Conditional Units of Total Value.

ATRIBUTION RULE Each effect is counted once and tied to a specific stock, flow, owner and proof. For causality, pilot/control, difference-in-differences, or a pre-recorded scenario without unification.

21. The Five Through Pilots

PilotContoursWhat is being checkedKPIThemes
1. Viable urban area01, 02, 07, 09, 11, 13, 16, 17electricity, water, communication, medicine and control in case of combined failureautonomy; percentage of services retained; RTO; Qsecurity, sustainability, trust
2. Agro-water-ecological basin01, 05, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16water, soil, harvest, logistics and incomem³/products; loss; water/soil quality; incomereproduction, common goods, safety
3. Closed industrial cluster05, 06, 07, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18Localization, material circulation and route reservematerial capacity; reuse; TCO; RTOsovereignty, development, option
4. Route "health - education - labor - culture"01, 02, 03, 04, 13, 14, 15, 16transition from prevention and rehabilitation to competence, work and participationwaiting; return to work; income; availability; trustreproduction, development, trust
5. Long horizon standard04, 05, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19compatible standard of data and evidence for climate, ocean, spacemutual recognition; term; compatibility; stress testoptionality, sovereignty, common goods

Five pilots cover everything together 19 contours. Target numbers are set after Z0 and stress tests. Each pilot publishes a Z0, Z1, Z2, Z3 and, when scaling, Z4.

22. Roadmap for deployment

HorizonActionsBenchmark
0–100 daysapprove C/B/S/Z; dictionary; owners; data scheme; veto register100% contours have owner; passport template; pilots selected
4–12 monthsZ0 pilots; data interfaces; anchors; independent verification; G0 - G5at least 5 pilots; Q base; directory of critical links
1–3 yearsZ2/Z3; passport scaling on 19 contours; base matrix 74119 passports; 741 cells; annual audit; veto register
3–6 yearsoperational Z4; interstate compatibility; stress testsresistant TCO; mutually recognized evidence; reduced cascades
to 2036full cycle of reproduction and long horizonconfirmed meaningful outputs; stored strategic options
FIRST EIGHT DECISIONS Approve classifier 19 and to prohibit the replacement of the contour by the department. • Lock 13 steam as mandatory through checks and red limits. • Approve S1–S3 as a working specification of the multiplier ×3 with the right to review after the pilot. • Enter your passport from 12 Sections and Five Unchanged States of Z0–Z4. • Appoint a decision owner, data owner and independent validator of each circuit. • Enter the register of intercontour interfaces, κ Coating, RTO and veto. • Stop counting results with Q<75 and hide the red cell medium. • Run five end-to-end pilots and pass solutions through G0–G8.

23. Conclusions

№ConclusionManagement sense
119 contours - control objectThey describe the reproducible capabilities of society and the state, not the structure of departments.
213 pairs — invariant checkEach result is evaluated at two poles; the weak pole is not hidden.
3Three levels detect transfer of effectLocal use is checked against industry and external damage.
4741 — register of decisions, not ratingEach cell contains a purpose, fact, reason, owner, deadline, Q and proof.
5Five states create memoryThe forecast, the pilot and the independent fact are kept separate; the methodology is being versioned.
6The Red Veto is stronger than the average.Critical limit, Q<75 or missing interface cannot be compensated.
719×19 and 19×13×3 complement each otherThe flux matrix shows the dependence, the tensor shows the quality of the balance.
8The benefits are considered counterfactual.Money comes only from preventable losses, savings, gain output and option value.
9RAS and independent verification - part of the contourScientific validity is separated from the owner of the budget and the executor.
10Unification is a common grammar, not a uniformity of goalsSubject corridors are different; the way to prove and make a decision is the same.
The matrix 741 answers: what is controlled, what contradiction is held and at what level the result is manifested. The five states show how well it is confirmed; the passport turns the measurement into a responsible decision; the semantic layer shows what it is made for.

Annex A. Matrix 19 × 13: Depth of Analysis Classes

A - anchor: full set KPI and target corridor. S — significant: causal verification and key limitations. M - Monitoring: Abbreviated set with explicit Q. This is a depth-of-analysis distribution project; it is not an evaluation of the result.

ContourB01B02B03B04B05B06B07B08B09B10B11B12B13
C01 DemographicsSASSSAASSSSMA
C02 HealthAASSSSAMSAAMS
C03 EducationSAMSSAASSSAAS
C04 CultureSAMSAASMMSAAS
C05 ScienceASMSAASSAASSM
C06 IndustryASSAASSAAASMS
C07 EnergyAMSAAASSSAMMS
C08 FoodASAASSASSASMA
C09 WaterASAASAAMMSSMS
C10 EcologyAMAASAAMSSMMA
C11 TerritorySAAASSASSSSMA
C12 TransportASAAASSSSASMA
C13 Data and AIAASSASASSAAMS
C14 FinanceASASAAAAASSMS
C15 Work and businessSAASSSAAASSMA
C16 ManagementAAASASASSSAMS
C17 ContinuousASASAASMSAAMS
C18 CooperationASSAASASASSSA
C19 Long horizonASSAAASMSASAS

Method of forming S in this version: if a non-anchor pair is an anchor minimum for two direct contour dependencies, it is marked essential. After the pilot, the classification is approved by the owner and the scientific validator.

Figure A1. Classes regulate the depth of analysis; all 247 intersections are present at each of the three levels.

Annex B. Unified Cell Data Dictionary

FieldContentsType / RangeI will.
periodPeriod of measurementdate / intervalYeah.
scenario_idScenario and Counterfactual BasestringYeah.
state_idZ0–Z4enumYeah.
scale_idS1–S3enumYeah.
contour_idC01–C19enumYeah.
balance_idB01–B13enumYeah.
method_versionversion of anchors, formulas and weightssemverYeah.
target_low / target_highTarget Corridornumber + unitYeah.
factActual valuenumber + unitYeah.
deltaDeviation from the target/previous statenumbercalculation
N / weightnormalized value and weight of the indicator0–100 / 0–0,15Yeah.
L / R / B / Gpoles, balance and gap0–100calculation
QQuality of evidence0–100calculation
veto_codeCritical limit violatedenum / nullYeah.
cause_idConfirmed reasonreferenceYeah.
stock_id / flow_idaffected stock and flowreferenceYeah.
owner_id / data_owner_idSolution and Data OwnerreferenceYeah.
decision / gateGO/REDESIGN/HOLD/STOP and G0–G8enumYeah.
deadlineThe next decisiondateYeah.
evidence_idprimary source and act of reconciliationreferenceYeah.
created_at / signed_atrecording and confirmation timetimestampYeah.
Any panel figure should be disclosed to the formula, primary source, version of the technique, owner and solution. Any decision is up to the balance, the veto and the evidence on which it is based.

Annex C. Intercontour interface card

FieldWhat is fixed
Supplier / RecipientC_i → C_j; one communication object
TypeResource / Reproduction / Restrictive / Information / External effect
Object and Unitenergy, water, competence, capital, data, resolution; natural unit separately from price
Power / Need / FactDo not mix available power and actual consumption
Stock before / afterreserve, infrastructure, personnel or natural capital
Minimum of ContinuityCritical need, κ Coating, RTO/RPO
Losses and externalitiesphysical loss, waste, risk, loss transfer
Replacementsalternative supplier, route, technology and switching lag
Compatibility with I_cddictionary, units, ID, time, evidence line, SLA
Owner / Solution / Termpersonal responsibility and next stage gate
INDEX INTERFACE I_cd = GM(Dictionary, Units, IDs, Time, Evidence, SLA). The missing critical interface is a veto, even if the average K compatibility index is high.

Node criticality index can use 0,30 Outgoing Centrality + 0,25 non-replaceable + 0,25 Emergency Recovery + 0,20 coverage of the population and functions. Weights must be approved before calculation and checked by stress test.

Annex D. Sources and methodological support

BlockSource / referenceUse
Basic architecture"Victory Doctrine 2026–2036", Annex A: 19 contours, matrix 741, passport, states, formulas and thresholdsinternal project core document
Previous analytical layer"Ministries, institutions, intersectoral balance and exits through meanings", 2026Five books, a cross-industry bridge and eight meanings
National accountsSystem of National Accounts; Supply-Use and Input-Output TablesSeparation of stocks, flows, value added and output
Natural capitalSystem of Environmental-Economic AccountingEnvironmental Assets and External Effects
Risk and ContinuityISO 31000; ISO 22301risk, RTO, continuity plans and verification
Data and evidenceprinciples of provenance, versioning, audit trail and independent reconcilationTraceability and Quality Q

Editorial rule: External standards are indicated as methodological guidelines without approval of a specific mandatory version. The regulatory version is chosen by the legal owner during implementation.

FINAL FORMULA Resource → Outline → pair balance → Level → Status → Proof → solution → Meaning. Unification is completed when this chain is traced in both directions without manual reconstruction.

Other published edition: 741 Svyazannye_19_Balansov_Unifikatsiya_741.pptx · Web Text +

Unification of the management system

19 × 13 × 3

Linked

19 balances

PASSPORTED

CELL

19 Contours • 13 Steam • 3 Levels

Status

Passport Sections

27 August 2026

Not a rating. Decision and evidence system.

What gives unification

SUMMARY FOR DECISIONS

741

3 705

Contours

Steam

Levels

Cell

Records

What is reproduced

What limits are kept

Where the effect is shown

one state

Five versions of images

Uniform identifiers, formulas, versions, Q, red limits and decision rules. The subject objectives of the 19 contours remain different.

One solution owner • one data owner • one independent verifier

The red veto is stronger than the average • Q < 75 does not confirm outcome

The panel shows the weak link, dependencies, and forecast - fact, not one rating

Why Separate Balance Sheets Can't Be Folded

LOGIC IS ACCOUNTED

appropriations, taxes, purchases

1. Fiscal entrance

Do not mix budget perimeters

Money/% of GDP

Loans, guarantees, assets and liabilities

2. Financial balance

Loan and guarantee are not equal to cost

stock, flow, risk, term

goods, services, imports, value added

3. Intersectoral flow

Do not add output and added value

Z, A, L=(I−A)⁻¹

power, availability, quality, recovery

4. Physical result

Cash register does not prove the result

natural outlet-KPI

Eight public abilities

5. The Meaningful Exit

Do not attribute causality without evaluation

Independent KPI 0–100

4 required transitions

Grammar of a single system

ARCHITECTURE

CONTOURS

COUPLES

LEVEL

CONDITIONS

DECISIONS

what is managed

between what

Where it appears

How confirmed

GO / REDESIGN / HOLD / STOP

U(z) = C₁₉ ⊗ B₁₃ ⊗ S₃ | |U| = 741 | 39 cells on the contour | 247 cells per level

5 states - versions, not a new multiplier

8 meanings - outputs, not additional cells

Countries - Section S3, not the value ×3

Control unit — certified cell

DATA → SOLUTION

KEY

x(c,b,s,z)

C06 Industry

B10 Innovations-reliability

6 IDs

period + scenario + state + scale + contour + balance

Target Corridor

fact

Deviation

80–90

RULE

Do not overwrite

Poles

Balance / Gap

evidence

76 / 73

74 / 3

ΔB(z)=B(z)−B(z−1); the technique has its own version

Cause

Owner

Veto

reason

Owner

Critical Limit

narrow test site

One is responsible

none

REQUIRED

4 Questions

Decision

Deadline

Evidence

decision

Term

Source

What stock? Which stream? What commitment? Which neighboring contours limit the result?

REDESIGN

ID + version

19 contours in five modules

NAVIGATION

4 frameworks

4 frameworks

M1 Man and cultural reproduction

M2 Knowledge, production and basic support

01 Demography • 02 Health • 03 Education • 04 Culture

05 Science • 06 Industry • 07 Energy • 08 Food

4 frameworks

5 frameworks

M3 Nature, territory and infrastructure

M4 Economics, coordination and sustainability

09 Water • 10 Ecology • 11 Territory • 12 Transport

13 Data and AI • 14 Finance • 15 Work and business • 16 Management • 17 Continuity

2 frameworks

M5 External and long horizon

18 Cooperation • 19 The Long Horizon

Module - easy navigation, not a new departmental border

Module I. Man and cultural reproduction

Health, competence and cultural memory are different stocks, but one cycle of intergenerational reproduction.

Code / OutlineKey stockVerified resultHard Limit
C01
Demography
Population, healthy years of life, family and human capitalSustainable reproduction of healthy and prosperous populationGrowth of preventable mortality; sustainable depopulation; inaccessibility of vital services
C02
Health
Public health, personnel, medicine, medicines and rehabilitation facilitiesReducing the burden of disease and restoring human functionThreat to patient safety; failure of critical infrastructure; shortage of drugs
C03
Education
Competences, teachers, schools, universities, engineering schools and personnel reserveCompetencies are in line with development objectives, talents are revealedLoss of basic literacy; critical shortage of teachers; mass gap is difficult
C04
Culture
Language, Historical Memory, Archives, Heritage and Cultural CompetencesContinuity of cultural memory in creative renewalIrreversible loss of heritage or archival foundation; transfer break

Module II. Knowledge, production and basic support

Research becomes a social result only through testing, production, energy and affordable nutrition.

Code / OutlineKey stockVerified resultHard Limit
C05
Science
Researchers, knowledge, infrastructure, intellectual property, experimental baseIndependently confirmed technologies are brought to useImplementation without safety check; non-reproducibility; loss of critical school
C06
Industry
Capacities, equipment, materials, technological competences and repair baseReliable complete production chainsOne unprotected supplier; industry safety violation; no repair or material
C07
Energy
Generation, networks, storage, fuel reserves and repair capacitiesContinuous, affordable and resource-efficient energyReservation broken; risk of major accident; no fuel or emergency power supply
C08
Food
Soils, genetic resources, herds, seeds, capacities and storageAffordable safe food without depleting the natural baseHazardous pollution; critical dependence on seeds; irreversible soil degradation

Module III. Nature, territory and infrastructure

The territory is viable when water, ecosystems, settlement, and transport are held together as a single resource circuit.

Code / OutlineKey stockVerified resultHard Limit
C09
Water
Fresh water, water ecosystems, networks, treatment and hydrotechnical facilitiesReliable water supply within the pool reproducibilityToxic pollution; fence above reproducible level; emergency hydraulic system
C10
Ecology
Natural capital, species, habitats, forests, soils and resilienceEconomic activity remains within the permissible loadIrreversible loss of species or habitat; hazardous pollution threshold; concealment of damage
C11
Territory
Housing, communal and social infrastructure, spaces and natural frameworkA connected system of secure settlements with equal basic accessConstruction at risk; growth of emergency fund; development without infrastructure
C12
Transport
Roads, railways, ports, fleets, rolling stock, hubs and warehousesAvailable continuous corridors with predictable delivery timeNo alternative route of critical cargo; security breach; corridor rupture

Module IV. Coordination, Economics and Security

Data, capital, labor, law, and continuity are not service functions, but end-to-end operating system 19 contours.

Code / OutlineKey stockVerified resultHard Limit
C13
Data and AI
Trusted data, computing and network infrastructure, models and competenciesA compatible, sovereign and secure digital environment under human controlLoss of human control; unverified AI; data compromise; dependence without replacement
C14
Finance
Savings, capital, reserves, payment infrastructure and long resourcesReproduction financing at an acceptable price and riskHidden liabilities; timing mismatch; debt without result; risk of payment sustainability
C15
Work and business
Qualifications, jobs, businesses, networks and work cultureProductive work, fair results and sustainable cooperationThreat to the life of an employee; debt; unfair contracting; displacement without transition
C16
Management
Legal certainty, competence, trust and registers of obligationsPredictable, responsible and contested governanceNo responsible or right of appeal; conflict of interest; concealment; systemic non-performance
C17
Continuity
Reserves, Duplicate Capacity, Recovery Plans, Teams and Secure InfrastructureAcceptable risk and restoration of critical functions within a given periodNo backup, copy or plan; known critical vulnerability; learning failure

5 Contour • Objectives are different • Passport and Evidence Unite

Module V. International and long horizon

Cooperation should provide mutual benefit now and preserve strategic options for future generations.

Code / OutlineKey stockVerified resultHard Limit
C18
Cooperation
Contracts, trust of partners, joint capacities, corridors and standardsEqual Diversified Projects with Mutual BenefitUnilateral critical dependence; loss of control; undistributed sanctions risk
C19
The Long Horizon
Strategic options, fundamental knowledge, observations, ocean, space and climate infrastructureThe choice of future generations and readiness for big challenges are preservedIrreversible damage; single-scenario lock; unfunded liability; loss of sight

2 Contour • Objectives are different • Passport and Evidence Unite

13 Invariant Balance Pairs

BASIC DOCTRINE

Security - Development

Labor - Capital

B01

B08

Man is a state

Competition - cooperation

B02

B09

Center - regions

Innovation - reliability

B03

B10

Nature — technosphere

Digital efficiency — human sovereignty

B04

B11

Sovereignty — Openness

Tradition - Update

B05

B12

Present - future

Agglomeration growth - spatial connectivity

B06

B13

Efficiency — fairness

All 13 The pair is applied to each 19 The contours on each 3 levels. One indicator ≤15%; The Meaning Block ≤35%.

B07

Math of one pair balance

METHOD

1. NORMATION

2. POOLS

3. BALANCE

0 / 40 / 60 / 80 / 100

L and R

B and G

Critical / Warning / Acceptable / Goal / Best Sustained Level

100 × exp[Σwᵢ ln(max(Nᵢ,1)/100)]

B=0,7·2LR/(L+R)+0,3·min(L,R) • G=|L−R|

The harmonic part evaluates consistency; min(L,R) does not allow the strong pole to hide the weak.

StateLRBGQStatus
Before the pilot76,2064,2068,0412,0089,35Yellow
After the pilot76,2072,6273,843,58≥85Yellow
Δ0+8,42+5,80−8,42—Conformity ↑

The gap has narrowed, but B<80 has not yet achieved green status.

It is the weak link, not the middle link.

POTENTIES AND VETO

B≥80 • L,R≥70 • G≤15 • Q≥85 • no veto

GREEN

All cases between green and red

YELLOW

B<50 • min(L,R)<45 • G>30 • or veto

RED

Q<75 — outcome cannot be counted

NOT CONFIRMED

One pair <35 or three pairs <50 It requires an inter-agency solution. Missing critical interface — veto.

Three Levels of Measurement

DRAFT UNIFICATION ×3

247

247

247

S1 •

S2 • Industry and National

S3 • Interstate and Global

Cells 19×13 at the

Cells 19×13 at the

Cells 19×13 at the

OBJECT

OBJECT

OBJECT

person, family, organization, facility, municipality, pilot

industry, regional system, federal program, cross-industry complex

Countries, cross-border systems, markets, standards and externalities

Evidence: primary observations, registers and measurements at the facility

Evidence: summary balances, interagency reconciliation, input-output tables

Evidence: comparable statistics, contracts and independent verification

S1 shows the primary fact of • S2 — cross-industry and national balance sheet • S3 — transfer of effect between countries, markets and generations

Matrix 19 × 13: Depth of analysis

DRAFT UNIFICATION • A/S/M

B01

B02

B03

B04

B05

B06

B07

B08

B09

B10

B11

B12

B13

C01 Demographics

C02 Health

Anchor

C03 Education

full KPI + Corridor

C04 Culture

C05 Science

C06 Industry

Significant

C07 Energy

C08 Food

Causal check

C09 Water

C10 Ecology

Monitoring

C11 Territory

C12 Transport

abbreviated + Q

C13 Data and AI

C14 Finance

247 Crossing the Layer × 3 Levels = 741. Class sets the depth of analysis, not the result.

C15 Work and business

C16 Management

C17 Continuous

C18 Cooperation

C19 Long horizon

Five states instead of one "current" value

VERSION

Original

Prognostic

After the pilot

Independently Confirmed

Operating

base line, limitations, quality of sources

result model, cost, uncertainty range

Fact, forecast, fact, side effects

Results after external verification of evidence

steady result, TCO, reproducibility

ΔB(z)=B(z)−B(z−1) • Old values are not overwritten • Transfer is allowed only on evidence

741 × 5 = 3 705 Status records in full cycle

Passport of the initiative: 12 mandatory sections

EXECUTIVE SPECIFICATION

Identification

Issue addressed

Base Line

Target result

outline code, initiative, territory, level, owner, version

Deficiency, Causal Hypothesis, Affected Groups

Z0, sources, boundaries and data limitations

corridor, period, allowable deviation

Matrix 13 Balances

Technology and organization

Legal regime

Finance

13 × 3 cells, classes A/S/M, red limits

mechanism for changing stocks and flows

powers, restrictions, procedure for appeal

CAPEX, OPEX, TCO, source of funds, liabilities

Plan

KPI and evidence

Risks

Decision on fate

stages, dependencies, control points

formulas, sources, periodicity, independent reconciliation

red bans, side effects, recovery

GO, REDESIGN, HOLD or STOP

Section 5 the World War II 39 Cells: 13 Steam × 3 level. One passport - one initiative or a pilot inside the contour.

Six axles EQUILIBRIUM

SYSTEM PROFILES

Reserves

Streams

Reproduction

What is accumulated and worn out

What is moving and at what speed?

How the system reproduces itself

Resilience

Legality

External effects

How to withstand the shock

Why the decision is accepted

Where benefits and damage are transferred

E = (A₁×A₂×A₃×A₄×A₅×A₆)^(1/6) • a strong axis does not conceal the failure of a weak one

Five books combine budget with social impact

UNIFORM STUDY

Fiscal entrance

Financial balance

Intersectoral flow

Physical result

The Meaningful Exit

appropriations, taxes, purchases

Loans, guarantees, assets and liabilities

goods, services, imports, value added

power, availability, quality, recovery

Eight public abilities

Money/% of GDP

stock, flow, risk, term

Z, A, L=(I−A)⁻¹

natural outlet-KPI

Independent KPI 0–100

Do not mix budget perimeters

Loan and guarantee are not equal to cost

Do not add output and added value

Cash register does not prove the result

Do not attribute causality without evaluation

m = H · Q · (I−A)⁻¹ · G · b − r

budget → program → industry → output → meaning; risks and coordination costs are deducted

Eight meanings - tested social abilities

EXIT, NOT LOSING

Sovereignty

Reproduction

Optionality

Resilience

Ability to act without critical dependence

Ability to maintain life and personnel

Saved Choices and Alternatives

Ability to withstand shock

Trust

Development

Security

Common goods

predictability and acceptance of rules

Increased Real Capabilities

protection of life and continuity

water, environment, knowledge and public access infrastructure

No more than three main meaning tags per initiative • one output is counted once • causality requires design evaluation

How 19 contours become connected

INTERCONTOUR BALANCE

Knowledge, production and basic support

Man and cultural reproduction

Nature, territory and infrastructure

C05 • C06 • C07 • C08

C01 • C02 • C03 • C04

C09 • C10 • C11 • C12

Economy, coordination and sustainability

External and long horizon

C13 • C14 • C15 • C16 • C17

C18 • C19

The output of one circuit is recorded as the input, obligation, constraint, or external effect of another

Example: education → labor → industry → finance → demography | energy and data — end-to-end constraints

Institutions: split execution, solution and verification

RACI AND EVIDENCE

FunctionLeading roleNecessary separation
Strategic objectivePresident / Security Councilmandate ≠ calculation KPI
Resources and performanceGovernmentfinancing ≠ independent verification
Territorial PilotRegions / MunicipalitiesOperator ≠ owner of the method
Scientific ValidityRAS / Universitiesvalidator ≠ Result Recipient
Law and controlParliament / Court / Auditcontrol ≠ operational execution
ProductionBusiness / Development Institutessupplier ≠ The only source of fact
Feedbackprofessional and public associationsParticipation ≠ Substitution of responsibility

FOR EACH BOX

1 Solution Owner

responsible for the time and action

DATA

1 Data Owner

formula, source, version, periodicity

PROOF

1 independent validator

Q and Causality of Results

The decision must be appealed; any figure traceable to the primary source

Nine gates solution G0-G8

DRAFT UNIFICATION

Mandate

Profile

Base

Task + Owner

12 sections

Z0 + anchor + Q

Alternatives

Right + Finance

Pilot

1 / 3 / 6 years

CAPEX/OPEX/TCO

Control + stop

Actual data

Scale

Outcome

Z2/Z3 + forecast/fact

stress test + interfaces

Z4 + long audit

The weak link and the veto determine fate

REDESIGN

HOLD

STOP

The benefits of unification are considered counterfactual.

ILLUSTRATIVE CALCULATION

NPV = Σ [Prevented damage] + savings + additional output + Optional value − cost of integration] /(1+r)ᵗ

ArticleAssumptionUsl. ed.
Savings on reporting19×8 Packages×120 h×2 = 36 480 h = 20,3 FTE+2 027
Acceleration of solutions40 solutions×20 days×2 units/day+1 600
Expected damage1 000 → 700+300
Additional outputConfirmed Pilot+700
Integration and launchdata + interfaces + audit + training−900
Net use, year 1sum of components3 727
Recurring at OPEX 450after launch4 177

3 727

Year 1

conventional units; not actual estimate

ATRIBUTION RULE

One effect, once

Binding to stock, flow, owner and proof. Causality: Pilot/control, DiD or pre-set scenario without unification.

1 FTE-year = 1 800 h = 100 Contingent Units of Total Value

Deployment: from dictionary to operational output

DRAFT UNIFICATION

0–100 days

4–12 months

1–3 years

3–6 years

to 2036

Classifiers C/B/S/Z

owners • dictionary • veto

Z0 five pilots

Anchors • Interfaces • G0–G5

Z2/Z3

scaling to 19 contours

Z4

Inter-State Compatibility

full cycle

Long horizon

19 owners

Single passport

5 pilots

Q base line

741 cell

annual audit

Stable TCO

Stress tests

Confirmed Meanings

Saved Options

Five end-to-end pilots jointly cover all 19 circuits; target numbers are approved after Z0 and stress test

Unification without simplification

CONCLUSION

19 contours

It is not limited to a single rating.

13 pairs

Check different objective goals

3 level

detect the transfer of benefits and damage

Q and veto

Determine whether the result can be recognized

five states

maintain forecast, fact and independent verification

Resource → Outline → pair balance → Level → Status → Proof → solution → meaning

19 × 13 × 3 = 741 • 12 Passport Sections • 6 Axes • 5 Books • 8 Meanings

Sources cited in presentation 3

  • Doctrine of Victory 2026–2036, Annex A
  • [/Sources]
  • Ministries, institutions, intersectoral balance and exits through meanings, 2026

Published files

Management · Full published text

SUR-810: Master Document

Source Status: Primary Document

Master document and strategic presentation of the development management system SUR-810.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/sur-810-master-dokument

Open on the site

Integrated Development Management of Russia

KRISTALL741 | STANDARDS 260 | MONETARY AND SETTLEMENT FRAMEWORK 810

The Concept of Transition to the Integrated Development Management System of the Russian Federation

Inter-agency review project

Author: Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov

Version 1.0 | 27 August 2026

DOCUMENT STATUS

Passport concept and mandatory differentiation of terms

MarkingValueStatus
SESDevelopment Management System of the Russian FederationDesigned organizational and methodological system
SUR/810Soviet ruble in historical lists ISO 4217Historical, invalid code
RUR/810Russian ruble to denomination 1998Historical, invalid code
RUB/643Russian ruble after denominationThe current code of the Russian ruble
810 in accountTechnical feature of the ruble in the rules of numberingNot a valid currency code
Outline 810Project and registry name of the design outline of the SESNot currency, not denomination or means of payment

MAIN

Summary for decision

The Russian Federation has national objectives before 2030 Year and future before 2036 years, strategic planning system, government programs, national projects and budget mechanisms. The challenge for the next phase is not to multiply bodies and documents, but to harmonize goals, data, resources, decisions, risks and measurable results.

SDGs are offered as an organizational, methodological and digital system of integrated development management. The unit of control becomes a closed evidence chain: the goal - the initial state - the solution - the resource - the execution - the result - an independent check - the adjustment.

The operational core of SUR is KRISTALL741: 19 interconnected balance management systems, 13 phases in a decision’s life cycle, and three scales of management. Each of the 741 cells receives a profile covering responsibility, data, resources, risks and results. Layer 260 sets standards, indicators, formulas, sources and validation rules.

Monetary and settlement contour SUR-810 connects the source of financing, the obligation, the ruble payment and the confirmed effect. In the pilot phase 810 is a historical identifier and a registry prefix, not a currency. Money execution and accounting are carried out in RUB/643.

DECISION

Proposed management solution

  1. Approve the development and limited piloting of SES as a system of decision support and interagency coordination.
  2. Determine the state customer, coordinator, pilot object and owner of a measurable result.
  3. Use KRISTALL741 as a methodological addressing model and catalogue 260 as a normative and measurement layer.
  4. Apply "810" only as the project and registry name of the monetary and settlement circuit; exclude money issue and public exchange promises.
  5. To offer the Bank of Russia participation in the monetary and legal expertise; to ensure the participation of the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Economic Development, the Treasury, Rosfinmonitoring, Rosstandart and interested bodies.
  6. Following the results of the pilot, submit a legal, economic, technological and organizational assessment and a scaling plan until 2030/2036.

FOUNDATIONS

Strategic and regulatory context

SDS is designed as an applied mechanism for the implementation of already established goals and documents, and not as a parallel contour of public power. The regulatory framework sets goals, mandates and requirements; the SDS itself requires a separate decision on the pilot.

BasisWhat setsRole for SDGs
Constitution of the Russian FederationPowers of the President, Government and Bank of RussiaNon-substitution of institutions and the legality of the monetary contour
172-FZStrategic planning systemLinkages of documents, indicators and monitoring
Decree No309National targets up to 2030/2036Top level of goal setting
Spatial development strategy No4146-rBalanced spatial developmentTerritorial balance sheets and pilots
Decree No145Scientific and technological developmentForecast, technology and expertise
Decree No400National securityLimitations, risks and sustainability
Resolution No171Government Coordination CenterCompatibility with current situation management

DIAGNOSIS

Problem field: the rupture of the management cycle

The main systemic deficit arises between the strategic planning document and the actually confirmed result. Goals, indicators, budgets, projects, data, risks and reporting often exist in different contours and are updated with different periodicity.

  • the same goal is decomposed into disparate indicators and reporting formats;
  • the data source, formula, version and owner of the indicator are not always traceable;
  • Inter-agency dependencies are detected after the project delay;
  • resource solution is not always associated with a specific passport result;
  • Risk signals come later than there is a need for adjustment;
  • The success of the event replaces the assessment of changes in the state of the territory, industry or person.

TARGET MODEL

Definition of SES and system boundaries

The CSD is a federal organizational, methodological and digital environment that links national goals, 19 balances, data, models, decisions, project obligations, legitimate calculations and evidence of results.

SUR

  • collects in a single model the goals, indicators, risks and dependencies;
  • forms scenarios and shows the consequences of solutions;
  • assigns responsibility through KRISTALL741 module profiles;
  • links the resource obligation with the result through the contour SUR-810;
  • provides versioning, origin of data and independent verification;
  • returns feedback to the next management cycle.

SRS does not comply

  • does not make political or legally significant decisions instead of authorized bodies;
  • does not create 741 body, 741 information system or new mandatory reporting;
  • does not open bank accounts, does not store customer funds and does not transfer money;
  • does not issue currency, money surrogate, digital currency or payment token;
  • does not replace official statistics, budget accounting and state audit.

ARCHITECTURE

Principles of Integrated Development Management

PrinciplePractical requirement
LegalityEvery decision, authority and calculation has a legal basis.
FederalityThe data remains with the owners; The SDS uses harmonized passports and interfaces.
SubsidiarityThe decision is made at the minimum sufficient level of management.
BalanceThe result is evaluated along with resources, limitations and side effects.
EvidenceEach indicator has a formula, source, version and validator.
ReversibilityFor a significant decision, stop conditions, rollback and standby mode are determined.
SecurityAccess, data, models and calculated events are divided into protection classes.
Human-centerednessThe result is a change in quality of life and sustainability, not the amount of reporting.

FIVE WORDS

General architecture of SUR

LayerPurposeMain result
1. Normative-targetNational objectives, strategies, powers, constraintsHierarchy of objectives and legal bases
2. Observation and dataOfficial statistics, departmental data, GASMP, feedbackVerified status picture
3. Analytics and ForecastingEQUILIBRIUM, balances, scenarios, early signalsOptions and implications
4. Project executionSFERA, ECO-PPA, SPECZASHCHITA, Project PortfolioResponsible, resources, time frame
5. Calculation and proofSUR-810, banking/treasury statuses, ESG-IR 1.0Relationship of obligation, payment and result

All layers use the common object identifier and passport version, but retain the legal separation of authority, data, and responsibility.

ARCHITECTURE

Institutional model and power allocation

The SDS is integrated into the existing public administration system. Each institution retains constitutional and legal powers; the digital platform provides coherent information, coordination routes, and evidence package.

InstituteRole in the circuitBorder
President of RussiaNational objectives and strategic prioritiesSDGs do not shape policy decisions
Presidential AdministrationCoherence of priorities and monitoring of assignmentsDepartmental execution is not replaced
The Russian GovernmentPortfolio, resources, interagency executionLegally significant decisions - on established procedures
The State CouncilFederal and regional coordinationThe powers of the subjects of the Russian Federation are preserved
Security CouncilRisks, safety and sustainabilityAccess — by modes and tolerances
Federal AssemblyLegislation and Parliamentary ControlSES does not replace legislation
Bank of RussiaMonetary and payment competenceParticipation offered; decisions within independent mandate
Russian TreasuryTreasury Execution and Budgetary TraceabilitySES does not open or maintain treasury accounts
The Accounts ChamberExternal state auditIndependent assessment is not replaced by self-assessment
RosstatOfficial statistical informationAuthor's indexes are marked separately
Subjects and municipalitiesTerritorial execution and feedbackThe principle of subsidiarity applies

ARCHITECTURE

Ecosystem of SDGs: roles without duplication

ComponentFunctionResult
EQUILIBRIUMBalance analysis, forecast and scenariosReasonable solutions
GASMPObservation and Early SignalsConfirmed event or rejection
KRISTALL741Object, phase and scale addressingPassport of the management module
SFERAAcceptance and routing of initiativesTransparent offer status
ECO-PPAStructuring of the project and resource commitmentsAgreed project package
SPECZASHCHITAExecution and protection of critical processesResults and Primary Evidence
ESG-IR 1.0Passport indicator and independent validationEvidentiary reporting
SUR-810Relationship of obligation, ruble payment and resultTraceable calculated trace

A typical chain: GASMP detects a signal → EQUILIBRIUM develops scenarios → KRISTALL741 addresses the module → SFERA registers the initiative → ECO-PPA formalises the project → SPECZASHCHITA ensures implementation → SUR-810 reconciles the obligation and payment → ESG-IR 1.0 confirms the result.

IDENTIFICATIONS

Three codes, three different functions

CodeFunctionWhat code does not mean
810Historical memory of calculations and the name of the traceability registerNot valid currency and not value factor
74119 Balance Management Systems × 13 Phases × 3 ScaleNot the number of bodies, departments or mandatory reports
260Catalog of standards, indicators, formulas and rules of verificationNot a fixed forever list of regulations

MONEY AND ACCOUNT CONTOUR

Code 810: historical chronology

Period / ObjectMarkingCorrect interpretation
Soviet RubleSUR / 810Historical currency designation in the lists ISO 4217
Russian ruble before denominationRUR / 810Historical designation of the old Russian ruble
Denomination with 01.01.19981000: 1Complete change in price scale; not the current rate
The current Russian rubleRUB / 643Current cash execution and accounting code
Bank account numbersign 810Technical feature of the ruble according to the rules of the Bank of Russia
Project SESSUR-810Name of the resource, obligation, payment and result communication registry

LEGAL CLEARNESS

810 and 643: Facts, Myths, and Obligatory Disclaimer

ApprovalEvaluationCorrect position
In Russia, two rubles are circulating - 810 and 643InvalidThe current ruble is designated RUB/643
810 in the account means Soviet rublesInvalidThis is a technical feature of the ruble in the account structure
The amount on the account should be multiplied by 1000Invalid1000:1 - completed denomination 1998 year
ISO-code itself creates a monetary claimInvalidThe classifier does not create an obligation or a course
SUR-810 can be used as project nameAdmissibleWith a clear disclaimer and calculations only in RUB
Conditional unit is possible in the contractConditionallyAfter legal qualification and with a defined ruble performance

Legal Model

Acceptable use case 810

ScenarioRiskSolution for the concept
Historical symbol and registry nameLowApply now with disclaimer
Non-transferable Analytical IndexLow-mediumMethodology, audit, no promise of exchange
Contractual unitMediumOnly after the legal conclusion and the model contract
Points of the closed projectMedium-highDo not sell, cash out, promise universal acceptance
Multilateral ClearingHighNot to be included in the base pilot; only with a regulated partner
Transferable token or digital rightVery highA separate regulated project on a legitimate infrastructure
Parallel currency "ruble 810"UnacceptableDelete from concept

MONEY AND ACCOUNT CONTOUR

Three-layer model SUR-810

LayerPurposeThe Source of Legal Truth
H-810 - historicalArchive SUR/RUR, comparison of statistical series, documentation of denominationPrimary historical documents and official data
L-643 - legalContracts, budget obligations, bank and treasury paymentsLaw, Contract, Bank or Treasury; Amounts of RUB
U-SUR - analyticalOptional index of cost, sustainability or resultApproved method; does not change monetary liability

MONEY AND ACCOUNT CONTOUR

Financial flow and functional modules

ModuleFunctionBenchmark
SourcesRegister of budgetary and extrabudgetary sourcesLegal basis and limit
ObligationsContracts, stages, amounts, termsUnambiguous connection to the project
Payment calendarPlanning of cash eventsEarly Deficit Signal
AcceptanceConfirmation of stage and resultSet of evidence
DecisionAuthorization by an authorized personSignature and authorization
IntegrationTransfer of Order to Bank or TreasuryStatus of execution at RUB
SverkaComparison of statement and project registerT+1 closure or incident
AuditUnchanged log and unload dossierThe Verified Chain

The SES operator does not accept client money, does not open accounts and does not make transfers. The money transaction is performed by a regulated infrastructure.

CONTROL

Eight mandatory contours of financial readiness

CodeContourBlocking condition
LEGLegal qualificationsUncertain legal nature of the operation
PAYPayment compatibilityUnlicensed translation or wrong route
BUDBudget compatibilityNo limit, basis or treasury control
TRCCross-cutting traceabilityPayment without obligation or acceptance
RESReserve and liquidityInadequate coverage of commitment
AMLAML/CFT, KYB/KYCUndetermined participant or unauthorized signal
CYBCybersustainabilityViolation of authority, integrity or signature
CNVEvaluation and conversionNo approved formula or reliable price source

OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR

Balance as a management system

In SES, the balance sheet is not a static table or a single indicator. It is a logical control system for a certain area of development: it observes the state of the controlled object, compares it with the target corridor, identifies the causes of deviation, forms impact options, connects the solution with the resource and checks the actual result by feedback.

System ElementContentsMandatory question
Managed ObjectPopulation, territory, resource, infrastructure, industry or institutionWhat exactly are we changing?
StateStocks, flows, structure, constraints and inter-balanceWhere are we now?
Target corridorStandard, target, tolerance and time frameWhere and within what limits are we going?
ObservationData sources, signals, frequency and qualityHow do we know about the change?
ModelCausal relationships, scenarios and prognosisWhy did the rejection occur?
RegulatorAuthorized owner of the decision and the route of approvalWho has the right to make a decision?
ImpactNorm, program, project, resource or organizational decisionWhat exactly will be done?
ImplementationResponsible, resource, calendar, dependencies and controlWho, when and at what cost?
FeedbackAcceptance, result, independent verification and adjustmentIs there an effect and what to change?

OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR

KRISTALL741: nineteen balance management systems

CodeBalance Management System
B01Demography
B02Health
B03Family, income and social well-being
B04Education, skills and talents
B05Culture, values and social cohesion
B06Work and employment
B07Food and APC
B08Space and resettlement
B09Housing and public infrastructure
B10Transport and logistics
B11Fuel and energy
B12Water
B13Natural capital and ecological capacity
B14Materials, resources and circularity
B15Production and cross-sectoral linkages
B16Finance, investment and budget
B17Science, technology and innovation
B18Digital environment, information and data
B19Security, sovereignty and institutional sustainability

Each of the 19 systems undergoes the same closed control cycle, but has its own object, target corridor, causality model, set of impacts, decision owners and outcome indicators.

OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR

Thirteen phases of the solution life cycle

CodePhaseThe main question
L01Signal or needWhat's changed?
L02Identification of data and sourcesWhat is the assessment based on?
L03Data validationCan we trust the data?
L04Base LineWhere do we start?
L05Balance and Causal DiagnosisWhy did the rejection occur?
L06Forecast and scenariosWhat will happen to different decisions?
L07Purpose, standard and allowable deviationWhat is the result and limit of risk?
L08Options for solutionWhat alternatives are available?
L09Legal Expertise and SecurityIs the decision legal and safe?
L10Resource and calculation modelWhat resources and calculations are needed?
L11Implementation and coordinationWho, what and when does it work?
L12Monitoring, acceptance and validationIs the test result achieved?
L13Adjustment, scaling or closingWhat to change in the next cycle?

OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR

Three Scales and Formula 741

CodeScaleModel solution
S1National / FederalNational goal, intersectoral balance, federal resource
S2Regional / InterregionalTerritorial scenario and inter-agency portfolio
S3Municipal / Object / ProjectSpecific performance, acceptance and effect
Example codeDecryption
SUR-B16-L10-S1Federal resource-calculated model of financial balance
SUR-B12-L12-S2Regional validation of the water balance result
SUR-B06-L11-S3Project execution on the balance of work and employment

KRISTALL741

Universal passport module

BlockRequired fields
IdentificationCode, name, version, date of action
ResponsibilityResult owner, operator, matching, validator
Legal modelRules, powers, licenses, permissible and prohibited functions
Target and PerimeterMeasurable result, term, territory, participants, restrictions
Entrances and exitsDocuments, data, events, solutions and exchange formats
IndicatorsFormulas, sources, frequency, thresholds, exceptions
RisksLegal, resource, financial, social, environmental, cyber risks
DependenciesRelated modules, directories, contracts, external systems
DecisionWhat is allowed, warned, blocked and approved by whom
Standby modeManual scenario, rollback, recovery and stop conditions
EvidenceSignatures, extracts, statuses, protocols, hashes and conclusions
HistoryAuthor, changes, agreement and basis of the new version

MEASUREMENT LAYER

Catalogue 260: standard for measuring the result

The number 260 stands for Managed Catalog of Standards and Indicators. The catalog is being versioned; each position undergoes methodological, legal and industry verification.

GroupContents of passportQuality control
TargetsRelationship to national purpose and instrumentConsistency of decomposition
Balance sheetStock, flow, deficit, sustainability limitBalanced identity and units
ResultChange object stateNot replaced by the volume of activities
RiskProbability, impact, early signalThreshold and owner of the reaction
DataSource, date, coverage, delay, qualityOrigin and version
ValidationVerification method, independent validatorReproducible calculation

DIGITAL ARCHITECTURE

Registers, data and evidence chain

RegisterKey objects
Objectives and documentsPurpose, indicator, reason, deadline, version
Balances and objectsBalance, territory, industry, object, relationship
Standards and indicatorsFormula, source, threshold, validator
Signals and initiativesEvent, source, priority, balance system and route
Programs and projectsPassport, stage, executor, dependence
Resources and fundingSource, limit, assignment, availability
Commitments and calculationsContract, stage, decision, payment status in RUB
Risks and SolutionsSignal, Evaluation, Authorized Decision, Term
Evidence and resultsAcceptance, indicator, verification, conclusion
Participants and credentialsOrganization, role, power of attorney, admission

DIGITAL ARCHITECTURE

Management cycle and automation rules

  1. The signal is recorded with the source, time, territory and level of trust.
  2. The algorithm offers a linked balance, phase, scale, and route owner.
  3. EQUILIBRIUM forms the baseline, dependencies, and scenarios.
  4. Authorized persons choose the decision and fix the legal basis.
  5. ECO-PPA translates the solution into a project, resource and commitment calendar.
  6. SUR-810 binds the obligation with the legal ruble performance.
  7. ESG-IR 1.0 confirms the change in the indicator; the result returns to the model.
AutomateIt requires a human decision
Check format, completeness and versionPolicy and regulatory choices
Comparison of identifiers and dependenciesResource approval and commitment
Calculation of indicators and early signalsLegal qualification of the disputed scenario
Blocking Technical DuplicationAddressing critical risk
Forming a dossier and reconciliationAcceptance of results and responsibility

MEASUREMENT

Result metrics and non-falsifiable readiness

The average score should not hide the blocking risk. Each mandatory circuit receives a level: 0 - blocked; 1 - projected; 2 - admitted to a limited pilot; 3 - ready for scaling.

ClassExampleRule
Stop indicatorUnlicensed transaction, payment without basisAcceptable value — only 0
ThresholdCompleteness of legal qualification100% types of operations before pilot
Operational KPICricket T+1, availability, STPThe model threshold is specified on the baseline
Effect indicatorChange of balanceComparison with baseline and control scenario
Data qualityCompleteness of origin and relevanceThe source and version are mandatory

MEASUREMENT

Model KPI financial circuit

Values marked [M] are model parameters of the pilot, not current standards. They are specified after the legal conclusion, the baseline and the first two months of measurements.

IndicatorPilot's thresholdStatus
Legal qualification of types of transactions100%Barrier to admission
Unlicensed financial functions0Stop indicator
Success of accepted payments≥99,0%[M]
Automatic processing without manual editing≥90%[M]
Matching to T+1≥99,5%[M]
Duplicate or orphaned payments0Stop indicator
Full chain commitment-result≥99,5%[M]
Accessibility of the financial circuit≥99,9%[M]
Unauthorized payments0Stop indicator
Formation of a complete dossier, P95≤15 minutes[M]

The payment order receives the idempotent key from the obligation, the recipient, the amount, the date, the contract and the stage. Repeat with the same key is blocked before checking.

CONTROL

Safety, AML/CFT and Continuity

MonitoringMandatory requirementEvidence
IdentificationParticipant and Beneficiary Verified Before OperationFile KYB/KYC and status
AML/CFTSignals are reviewed by an authorized compliance officerSolution and log of actions
CredentialsThe Two-Person Principle for Monetaryly Significant ActionsEP, role, power of attorney
IntegrityUnchanged log of critical eventsSignature, time and control hash
AccessMinimum privileges and multifactor authenticationRole Matrix and Log Ins
ContinuityStandby mode, RTO/RPO and recovery testProtocol of at least two tests [M]
Personal dataMinimization, purpose of processing and storage timeRegister of grounds and deletions
KIIClassification and profile measures, if applicableCategorization and control

IMPLEMENTING

Pilot 2026–2027: Object and limits

The pilot is selected according to the principle of manageable complexity: one complex task or territory, several interrelated balances, measurable results, available data and a ready-made owner of the solution.

ParameterProposed framework
Perimeter3 projects, 3–5 legal entities and one adjustable payment adapter [M]
OperationsUp to 2 000 ruble events; without public issue, exchange and fundraising [M]
BalancesThe 3–5 most closely connected balances from KRISTALL741
DataOfficial and departmental sources plus documented primary information
FinanceRUB/643 through a bank or Treasury; "810" only in Registry ID
MonitoringLegal, financial, cybernetic and methodological independent verification
WithdrawalDecision to discontinue, modify or scale

IMPLEMENTING

Pilot stages: 30 / 100 / 365 days

TimeframeWorksSolution of the control point
0–30 daysAssignment of the customer and the owner; selection of the object; inventory of law, data, systems and calculationsThere is a mandate, borders and a baseline
31–100 daysLegal opinion; model 741; catalogue of indicators; prototype of registers; security architectureGo/revise/stop for limited launch
101–180 daysShadow mode without legally significant automatic solutions; reconciliation with current processesConfirmed data quality and manageability
181–300 daysLimited working pilot with human control and independent auditPerformed stop indicators and KPI
301–365 daysStress test, recovery, effect assessment and scaling packageGovernment decision on the next stage

IMPLEMENTING

KPI Twelve Month Pilot

BlockCompletion criterion
Right100% Scenarios are Qualified; 0 Unlicensed Functions; 0 Critical remarks
Management100% critical decisions have owner, basis and evidentiary package
Data100% required fields have source, time and version
Payments≥99% Success; ≥90% STP; 0 Losses and losses [M]
Sverka≥99,5% Operations Closed T+1; unexplained difference — 0 [M]
Traceability≥99,5% Complete chains; dossier ≤15 Minutes [M]
Security≥99,9% Accessibility; 0 unauthorized payments; two DR tests [M]
ResultImprovement of the selected balance sheet indicator relative to the baseline confirmed
EfficiencyTime or labor gain is measured without deterioration of control
AuditIndependent legal, financial and cyber verification without critical remarks

The threshold values [M] are the pilot's hypotheses. The empirical effect is not declared until the baseline and the results of the control period are obtained.

MASSTABING

Road map to 2030 and 2036

StageFocusResult
2026Design and legal qualificationsHarmonized architecture, passports and pilot frames
2027Pilot and independent inspectionThe decision to modify or scale
2028Inter-agency integrationCommon identifiers, API and evidentiary packages
2029–2030Expansion into portfolios and territoriesSustainable cycle of national goals
2031–2036Adaptive development managementScenario management of long-term balance sheets

ORGANIZATION

Program Management and Responsibility Model

RoleResponsibility
State CustomerMandate, pilot facility, resource and final decision
Interagency Coordinating CouncilDependency resolution and lock control
Owner of the resultChange the state of the selected balance
Methodical CenterModel 741, catalog 260, quality indicators
Platform OperatorIntegrations, Availability, Logging and Support
Financial operatorBank or Treasury; executed at RUB
Legal CommitteeScenario Qualifications and Border Control
Independent ValidatorVerification of results, methods and evidence
Auditor / Supervisory AuthorityIndependent evaluation and recommendations

RISKS

Key risks and management measures

RiskManifestationMeasure
LegalSUR-810 is perceived as private moneyDisclaimer, qualification, only RUB/643
Reputational810 with pseudo-legal theoriesPublic fact sheet and common terminology
InstitutionalFear of organ replacementExplicit lines of authority and joint management
DataIncomparable formulas and versionsPassport indicator and origin of data
ModelError prediction or automation of the solutionScripts, person in outline, version log
FinancialPayment without reason or doubleSet check, two faces, idempotent key
CyberneticCompromise access or registrySegmentation, MFA, signature, reservation
ProjectThe first perimeter is too wide.Limited pilot and stop/go locks
MethodicalActivity instead of effectBaseline and independent validation

DRAFT DECISION

Draft instruction on pilot launch

Suggested wording for further legal development:

  1. To the Government of the Russian Federation to prepare proposals for a limited pilot project of the Development Management System of the Russian Federation.
  2. Determine the state customer, coordinator, pilot object, the list of participants and the owner of the measurable result.
  3. Provide a distinction between the organizational and methodological architecture of the SRS and the monetary and legal status of the designation 810.
  4. Form an inter-agency working group with the participation of interested bodies; The Bank of Russia shall offer participation within the established competence.
  5. Within a period of up to 100 days, prepare a joint legal, financial, technological and organizational conclusion and pilot’s regulations.
  6. Establish that all legally significant pilot calculations are carried out in rubles of the Russian Federation through authorized banking or treasury infrastructure.
  7. Within the pilot, do not allow the issue or sale of the instrument identified by code 810 or promises to exchange it; do not allow the operator to perform unlicensed financial functions.
  8. After twelve months, submit a report with an independent assessment and proposals for termination, finalization or scaling.

PLAN OF ACTION

First 100 days: list of specific results

ResultContentsAcceptance
Pilot's mandateCustomer, owner, facility, boundaries and budgetary basisExecutive document
Legal MemorandumQualification SUR-810, roles, data and financial scenarios0 Open Critical Questions
Process MapCurrent and target cycle from signal to resultConsent of owners
Matrix 741Selected balances, phases, scales and passportsComplete required fields
Catalogue of indicatorsThe first version of the set 260 and methodsExpert and statistical verification
Data ArchitectureRegistries, API, identifiers, access and originTechnical Council
Prototype SUR-810Register of obligations and payment statuses without storage of fundsReconciliation of test data
Security ModelThreats, Roles, Logging, BackupTest and report
Measurement planBaseline, KPI, control script and validatorIndependent opinion
Gateway solutionGo / revise / stopCoordinating Council Protocol

CONCLUSION

Final position

The SRM shifts development management from a set of disparate documents and information contours to 19 interconnected balance management systems and a single but federative cycle of responsibility: from signal and scenario to legitimate resource, execution and independently validated result.

KRISTALL741 creates an addressable operational matrix, catalogue 260 a language of measurement, and SUR-810 traceability of the connection between an obligation, a ruble payment and the result.

Historical accuracy is fundamental: SUR/810 the Soviet Ruble, RUR/810 — the Russian ruble to denomination, RUB/643 — to the current Russian ruble. In a bank account 810 It is a technical feature of the ruble. This history does not create a modern exchange rate or monetary claim.

SUR-810 does not return the old currency - it returns the traceability, long-term and relationship to the result.

ANNEX A

Official sources and regulatory materials

1. Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 75

2. Federal Law No. 172-FZ "On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation"

3. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 309 on national goals

4. Spatial Development Strategy, Government Order No4146-r

5. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 145 on scientific and technological development

6. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 400 on the National Security Strategy

7. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 171 on the Coordination Center

8. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1278 on the FIS of strategic planning

9. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 733 on the national data management system

10. Bank of Russia: explanation of the ruble sign 810 and currency code 643

11. Bank of Russia Regulation No. 809-P: Rules for Numbering Personal Accounts

12. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 822 on denomination

13. ISO: Standard ISO 4217

14. SIX: official escort body ISO 4217

15. SIX: historical list ISO 4217 List Three

16. Bank of Russia: digital financial assets

17. Bank of Russia: digital ruble

ANNEX B

Glossary and rules of terminology

TermWorking definition
Balance management systemClosed circuit: object, state, target, observation, model, solution, impact, resource, execution and feedback
EvidenceDocument, status, measurement or conclusion with origin and version
ContourA set of processes, data, roles and control rules with a common function
Module 741Addressable combination of balance, life cycle and scale phases
Indicator 260Validated passport of definition, formula, source, threshold and verification
SUR-810Project name of the source, obligation, ruble payment and result communication register
RUB/643Current designation of the Russian ruble for cash execution
Sign 810Technical element of the structure of the Russian bank account
PilotLimited hypothesis testing with predefined boundaries and stop conditions
ValidatorIndependent or functionally separate subject of result verification

ANNEX C

Methodological reservations

  • The document describes the target concept and does not prove the actual economic effect before the pilot.
  • The numbers 741 and 260 are elements of the author's architecture; their application requires approved passports and versions.
  • Model thresholds [M] are not government regulations, bank rules, or a promise of result.
  • Official statistics have priority within their subject area; derived indices are labeled as analytical.
  • The algorithm supports decision but does not replace authority, legal responsibility, and professional judgment.
  • Financial, tax, accounting, procurement and currency scenarios require separate qualifications for participants and the pilot facility.
  • Any function of transferring, storing, exchanging or raising money is excluded from the pilot if it is not performed by a properly regulated entity.
  • Scaling is allowed only after an independent assessment of the law, effect, security, cost of ownership and organizational readiness.

End of document

Other published revision: SUR SUR_810_Strategic_Presentation.pptx · web text +

810

HISTORIC

RCD

Management system

Development of Russia

19 balance management systems • KRISTALL741

Standards 260 • monetary and settlement contour SUR-810

Inter-agency review project

810 is not the pilot's currency

Author: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich | version 1.0 | 27 August 2026

You can fly now.

MANAGEMENT POSITION

The monetary value of 810 is not introduced - it passes a separate legal gateway

SUR - run as a control system

810 - use only as project code

Organizational and methodological architecture, 19 balance systems, matrix 741, catalog 260 and evidence cycle.

Historical identifier and name of the traceability registry. All calculations, accounting and payments — in RUB/643.

Requested solution: legal training + limited non-monetary pilot

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

National goals need a closed execution cycle

THE PROBLEM

Goal

Data

Decision

Resource

Implementation

Evidence

result and deadline

status and signal

Option and Authority

Commitment and limit

Responsible and Stage

effect check

Feedback returns the confirmed result to the next decision cycle

The SES does not create a new power; it makes the current cycle coherent and verifiable.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Balance is a management system

OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR

Not a static table, but a closed loop of impact and feedback

Object

State

Goal

What we change

Where we are

Target Corridor

Observation

Model

Decision

How we know

Why and what will happen

Who is entitled

Impact

Implementation

Feedback

What we do

Who and what

Has the effect been achieved

object + Objective + surveillance + Model + Authority + Impact + resource + execution + feedback

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Nineteen interrelated balance sheet management systems

KRISTALL741

Man and Society

Territory and life support

Production and capital

Knowledge and sovereignty

B01 Demographics

B07 Food

B14 Resources and Circularity

B17 Science and Technology

B02 Health

B08 Space

B15 Manufacturing

B18 Digital environment

B03 Family and income

B09 Housing and utilities

B16 Finance and investments

B19 Security and Sustainability

B04 Education

B10 Transport

B05 Culture and connectedness

B11 Energy

B06 Labour and employment

B12 Water

B13 Natural capital

Each system has its own object, purpose, regulator, impact and feedback — and is not a new agency.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

SES closes eight management actions

TARGET MODEL

Signal

Diagnostics

Scenario

Decision

Adjustment

Validation

Implementation

Resource

The decision is made by the authorized institute • SRS provides evidence and reversibility

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

810

IDENTIFICATIONS

810 / 741 / 260 - three codes, three functions

741

260

TRAVELING

ADDRESS OF MANAGEMENT

MEASUREMENT

Historical memory of calculations and the relationship "resource - obligation - result"

19 Balance Management Systems × 13 Phases × 3 Scale

Catalog of standards, indicators, formulas, sources and validation rules

Codes work together but do not replace each other.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Code 810 — historical; current ruble — RUB/643

HISTORICAL ACCURACY

SUR / 810

1000: 1

Soviet Ruble

denomination

from 01.01.1998

RUR / 810

RUB / 643

Russian Ruble

Before the denomination

current

Russian Ruble

Historical 1000:1 — a complete change in the scale of prices, not the current exchange rate between "two rubles"

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The four myths about 810 are four verifiable facts

LEGAL CLEARNESS

In Russia, the ruble 810 and 643

The current ruble is designated RUB/643

MYTH

FACT

810 in the account means Soviet rubles

This is a technical feature of the ruble in the account structure

MYTH

FACT

The amount on the account must be multiplied by 1000

1000:1 - completed denomination 1998 year

MYTH

FACT

ISO-code itself creates a monetary claim

The classifier does not create an obligation or a course

MYTH

FACT

810 in a bank account is not an incident and does not require a change of details

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The pilot's money system remains operational

LEGAL BORDER

Ruble

Emissions

Monetary unit of the Russian Federation

Exclusive competence of the Bank of Russia

CFA

The Digital Ruble

Not a means of payment

Form of national currency issued by the Bank of Russia

Pilot: without emission, sale, exchange, wallets and promise of state guarantee

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

What is acceptable now, what is conditional, what is excluded

SCENARIO 810

STOP

CAN NOW

AFTER EXPERTISE

NOT IN THE BASIC PILOT

historical symbol

contractual unit

Parallel Currency

Registry Name SUR-810

Defined ruble equivalent

public token or clearing

Non-transferable Analytical Index

Model contract and methodology

promise of exchange and return

Recommended route: historical sign → analytical index → only then separate contractual model

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Three layers - one priority of legal truth

SUR-810

H-810

HISTORICAL REGISTER

RULE

PRIORITY

archive SUR/RUR • comparison of series • Documentation of denominations

In the event of a discrepancy, the law, contract, bank, or Treasury shall prevail in RUB.

The analytical record SUR does not change the monetary liability.

L-643

LEGAL REGISTER

contracts • budget • liabilities • bank and treasury payments RUB

U-SUR

ANALYTICAL LAYER

indices of value, stability or result • only according to the approved method

810 — Memory • 643 — execution

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Money moves into RUB; SAD Drives Evidence

MONEY AND ACCOUNT CONTOUR

Source

Bank /

Treasurer

Outline

Project

account

Acceptance

Decision

Payment

in RUB

Sverka

ESG-IR

Result

SRS

SRS does not comply

Basis • obligation • stage • decision • status • result

does not keep funds • does not open accounts • does not transfer money

Transfer operator - only regulated bank or Treasury

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Readiness is equal to the weakest mandatory circuit

CONTROL

Right

Payment

Budget

Next

LEG

PAY

BUD

TRC

legal qualification

Regulated route

Limit and basis

End-to-end traceability

Reserve

AML/CFT

Cyber

Evaluation

RES

AML

CYB

CNV

Coverage of obligations

KYB/KYC and signals

Integrity and Access

Approved method

Readiness SUR = min ( LEG, PAY, BUD, TRC, RES, AML, CYB, CNV )

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Address of each management task

KRISTALL741

MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

BALANCES

THE PHASE OF LIFE

CYCLA

MASSTABA

GOVERNANCE

object and target state

from signal to adjustment

Federal • Regional • Project

19 × 13 × 3 = 741

741 — not the number of bodies or IT systems; this is the number of management modules addressed

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Thirteen Phases Turn Signal Into System Training

KRISTALL741

L01 Signal

L02 Sources

L03 Verification

L04 Base line

OBSERVE

L05 Diagnosis

L06 Scripts

L07 Purpose / Standard

L08 Options

L09 Law / Security

DECIDE

L10 Resource model

L11 Execution

L12 Validation

L13 Adjustment

PERFORM AND STUDY

Phase L13 returns the confirmed result in L01 - the system becomes adaptive

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

One Balance System - Three Scale Solutions

KRISTALL741

FEDERAL

national target • intersectoral balance • federal resource

REGIONAL

territorial scenario • interagency portfolio

PROJECT

specific performance • acceptance • confirmed effect

SUR-B16-L10-S1

financial balance • resource model • federal scale

Scales are related by feedback: the project result clarifies the regional and federal model

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Eight components form one proof route

ECOSYSTEM

GASMP

EQUILIBRIUM

KRISTALL741

SFERA

Signal

script

Address

Initiative

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

SUR-810

ESG-IR 1.0

draft

execution

calculated trace

Validation

Each component is responsible for its own function; a common identifier links the evidence

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Authority remains with the existing bodies

INSTITUTIONAL MODEL

Objectives and strategy

Coordination

Russian President • Federal Assembly • Government of the Russian Federation

Presidential Administration • State Council • Coordination Center

Money and Execution

Security and independence

Government • Ministry of Finance • Treasury • regulated bank

Security Council • Bank of Russia — participation within its own mandate

Data and methodology

Control and proof

Rosstat • RAS • industry centers • subjects of the Russian Federation

The Accounts Chamber • Audit • Independent Validators

The SRM links the basis, data, decision, resource and result - but does not make a decision instead of the institute

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

100

IMPLEMENTING

Pilot 30 / 100 / 365 days - with the right to stop

365

DAYS

DAYS

DAYS

Mandate and boundaries

Legal Gateway

Verified result

customer • object • reference line

conclusion • passport • prototype

Pilot • Audit • Scale Decision

Perimeter [M]: 3 Project • 3–5 legal entities • to 2 000 Ruble Operations

Each control point allows go/revise/stop

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

100%

MEASUREMENT

Pilot proves right, reliability and effect

≥99% [M]

Legal Qualification of Scenarios

Unlicensed Functions

success of accepted payments

≥99,5% [M]

≥99,9% [M]

full chain and reconciliation T+1

availability of financial contour

Confirmed balance effect

[M] — pilot's model threshold, not a state standard and not a promise of effect

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Stop/go gateways protect the pilot from irreversible errors

RISKS

STOP

public promise of exchange or return

legal model approved for 100% scenarios

receiving other people's money by the operator SUR

all payments go through a bank or Treasury

no power, reason or AML-permit

the decision has an owner and a full evidentiary package

broken signature, integrity or access control

Recovery and safe rollback

810 is used as a valid currency

No independent review criticisms

Law and security are barriers, not elements of the average score

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Road map to 2030 and 2036

MASSTABING

2026

2028

2031–36

Design

Integration

Adaptive management

Right • Architecture • Base Line

common identifiers • API •

scenarios • Early Signals • Long-term balance

2027

2029–30

Pilot

Extension

limited run • independent check

portfolios • territories • national goals

Scaling is determined by the readiness of the gateways - not by a calendar date

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Four Actions to Launch an SAR

DRAFT DECISION

Approve the limited pilot of SES

To appoint the customer and the owner of the result

Decision Support and Interagency Coordination Systems

identify the object, boundaries, participants and control points

100 days to complete the legal gateway

After 12 months to make a decision

810 — project name only; financial performance — RUB/643

stop • revise • scale based on independent verification

SUR-810 does not return the old currency - it returns the traceability, long-term and relationship to the result

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Sources cited in presentation 26

  • Author's concept of SUR, Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich, version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • https://www.cbr.ru/explan/acts_bko/
  • [/Sources]
  • Author's concept of SUR, version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • https://kremlin.ru/acts/constitution/item
  • https://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/73986
  • https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201406300016
  • Author's concept of SUR: "Balances as control systems", Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich, 27.08.2026.
  • The author’s KRISTALL741 classification, version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • The author’s concept of SUR and KRISTALL741, version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • https://www.six-group.com/en/products-services/financial-information/market-reference-data/data-standards.html
  • https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/11299/print
  • https://www.cbr.ru/Queries/XsltBlock/File/144005/-1/2400-2401
  • https://www.cbr.ru/finm_infrastructure/digital_oper/
  • https://www.cbr.ru/PSystem/dr/
  • https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?doc_itself=&fulltext=1&nd=102033239&page=1&rdk=155
  • Author's model SUR-810, version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • Author's model of financial readiness SUR-810, version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • The author’s KRISTALL741 model, version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • The author's architecture of the ecosystem of SUR, version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202102220029
  • Author's plan of the pilot of SUR, version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • Author's register KPI Pilot SUR-810, Version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • Author's risk matrix of SUR, version 1.0, 27.08.2026.
  • https://www.cbr.ru/counteraction_m_ter/
  • Author's road map of SUR, version 1.0, 27.08.2026.

Published files

State · Full published text

Managing the Country and State Corporations

Source Status: Primary Document

Material on the role of state corporations and systemic frameworks for managing the country’s development.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/upravlenie-stranoi-i-goskorporatsii

Open on the site
Thesis. The state determines goals and limits; balance sheets show the state of the whole; state corporations and public sector organizations turn goals into agreed programs; SUR connects data, decisions, resources, execution and proven result.

It is proposed to launch not a new supra-agency corporation, but a government portfolio coordination loop. It operates on top of existing powers and ensures traceability from the national goal to the object, the contract, the performer, the result and the feedback.

  • Approve the concept of management of corporate public portfolio through 19 interconnected national balance sheets.
  • Determine the customer and pilot IAC; include 3–5 corporate participants, 2–3 territories, 5 balance sheets and 10–15 projects.
  • To conduct 100-day pilot without changing the existing powers and without new capital-intensive obligations outside the approved programs.
  • According to the results of the pilot to present the regulations, a digital prototype, a list of legal changes and the decision to scale up to 2036.

Source / legal basis: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No 309 from 07.05.2024; the Government of the Russian Federation 761 from 19.06.2026.

02 The problem of fragmentary control

Function: Identify Gaps → Result: Management Gap Map

Large state organizations have resources, technologies, infrastructure, data and project competencies. However, their strategies, investment programs, procurement, and KPI are often reviewed by individual legal entities and industry contours. The state result arises between them - in the territory, in the supply chain and in the totality of effects.

GapManifestationManagement investigation
Aims ↔ programsThe national indicator is not brought to the portfolio of projectsContributions and responsibilities cannot be established
Assets ↔ resultsProperty register separated from social effectThe value of the asset is visible, the utility is not
Branches ↔Solutions are optimal within the agency, but conflict on the groundHidden Deficits and Cost Transfers
Budget ↔ corporate capitalDifferent horizons, classifiers and evaluation rulesNo full life cycle is visible
Report ↔ proofThe indicators are not related to primary dataWeak reproducibility of conclusions
Risk ↔ feedbackDeviation is fixed after the eventLate correction
The key transition. Evaluate not the organization in isolation, but its contribution to the state of national balance sheets, while maintaining separate financial, sectoral and legal responsibility.

The problem is not solved by one integral assessment. The overall index must be accompanied by disclosure of critical deviations, data sources, model constraints and response measures.

03 Balances — management system

Function: Determine the Unit of Observation → Result: Managed Integrity

The balance sheet in model SUR is not just an accounting form and not a static summary. It is a passport of manageable proportion: need, resource, power, availability, risk, plan, fact, forecast, responsible and proof of result.

Closed loop. Monitoring → analysis → script → State Decision → resource support → execution → Verification → adjustment.
Passport elementWhat is fixedWhy it matters
StateBase, fact, dynamics, territorySingle reference line
NormaPurpose, Range, Term, Critical ThresholdThe Acceptable Corridor
StreamsResources, capacities, exchanges, dependenciesIntersectoral effect is seen
DecisionOption, assumptions, authority, dateReproducibility of choice
ImplementationProject, contract, asset, responsibleTraceability of action
ResultSocial impact and side effectsEvaluation of the benefit for the whole
EvidenceSource, methodology, version, signatureTrust in data

For the growth indicator, the ratio s=(x−b)/(T−b) is used, limited to the range 0...1; for the decline indicator, the direction changes. The valuation is multiplied by the evidentiary factor c. All weights, goals, and methods are approved before the assessment period.

04 19 National Balance Sheets

Function: create a single coordinate system → Result: comparability of solutions

The proposed classifier does not replace strategic planning documents. It links them across exposures and allows them to see the transfer of resources, effects and risks between sectors.

CodeBalanceCodeBalance
01Demography and human potential11Ecology and Biosphere
02Health and active life12Spatial development
03Education and competence13Housing and urban environment
04Science and technology14Transport and logistics
05Work and employment15Digital and information environment
06Industry and capacity16Finance, budget and investment
07Energy17External cooperation
08Raw materials and resources18Safety and resilience
09Food19Culture and historical heritage
10Water
Owner's rule. The state remains the owner of the national goal and balance. The corporate participant receives only the agreed execution mandate and is required to disclose the contribution, risk and evidence.
  • Each balance sheet has a passport, data owner, responsible authority and corporate execution portfolio.
  • The project is included in the portfolio only after checking the impact of the minimum on the main and related balances.
  • One balance cannot be improved at the cost of the other’s hidden deterioration; the negative effects are shown separately.

05 Principles of Architecture SUR

Function: Fix the Rules → Result: Design and Control Code

  1. Legitimacy: the new outline does not replace the President, the Government, the Federal Assembly, the Accounts Chamber, the Federal Investment Fund and corporate governance bodies.
  2. Integrity: The decision is assessed by the cumulative effect on national balances.
  3. Subsidiarity: the task is solved at the minimum sufficient level of authority.
  4. Data Uniformity: Common identifiers, classifiers, and versioning rules.
  5. Distinction of rights: the treasury, property of the state corporation, shares, subsidiary assets and attracted funds are not mixed.
  6. Evidence: indicator without source and reproducible method is not considered achieved.
  7. Pre-modeling: A meaningful solution gets a scripted passport before launch.
  8. Lifecycle: Creation, operation, renewal, recycling and recovery are taken into account.
  9. Absence of double counting: one effect is distributed among participants by approved attribution.
  10. Two-way transparency: Open reporting is combined with a secure application.
  11. Reversibility: Pilot solutions have conditions for stopping, reviewing, and scaling.
  12. Continuity: Knowledge, grounds and versions are preserved in the Heritage Archive.
The Constitution of the One. SUR is a common layer of rules, data, identity, and coordination. It binds the modules to common protocols without absorbing them.

06 Legal Perimeter and Role of State Corporations

Function: Separate Forms and Mandates → Result: Power Matrix

As of 28 August 2026 In Russia, there are five state corporations in the strict sense of the article 7.1 the Law No 7‑FZ. The term cannot be extended to all major public sector organizations.

FormExamplesPublic administration machinery
State CorporationVEB.RF, Rostec, Rosatom, Roscosmos, ASVSpecial Federal Law; Supervisory Board / Board of Directors
GoscompanyRussian RoadsArticle 7.2 the Law No 7‑FZ and special law
PKKFRT, Roskadastr, Single customerAct No 236‑FZ and the Act on the specific RPC
AO with state participationRZD, DOM.RF and othersThe state acts as a shareholder through corporate procedures and directives
FSUE / InstitutionBy Relevant RegistersPowers of the owner and the branch body
The legal boundary. The property of the state corporation belongs to it, not to the treasury. The Coordination Center shall not have the right to dispose of the asset, change the mandate or replace the Supervisory Board without a regulatory basis.

Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 761 from 19.06.2026 refers program and planning documents of state corporations, state companies and JSC with state participation to the instruments of the Unified Plan. Therefore, integration is built through the connection of goals, programs, indicators and monitoring, and not through an administrative association of legal entities.

Source / legal basis: 7‑FZ, Special Laws No 82‑FZ, 270‑FZ, 317‑FZ, 215‑FZ, 177‑FZ; Regulation No 761.

07 Closed loop target architecture

Function: Binding Outlines → Result: Full Management Cycle

Architecture SUR organizes a single solution route. Each module has its own function, owner and readiness criterion; the transition to the next stage is allowed only through the verifiable gateway.

ContourRoleExit / Gateway
OKO / EQUILIBRIUMMonitoring, balancing, early warningSignal and Deviation Map
IACData consolidation, causal and scenario analysisSolutions and risks
Digital twinModelling the consequencesScenario passport
SFERAAcceptance and structuring of initiativesPassport of the project plan
ECO‑PPACommitments, resources, contractual frameworkSecured project
SPECZASHCHITAConsortium, production, pilot, scalingCompleted phase
ESG‑IRMeasurement and verification of effectsProven result
Heritage archiveVersions, bases, knowledge and rightsInstitutional memory
FeedbackAdjustment of goals, models and portfolioNew balance sheet status
Scaling by readiness. The extension is determined by the readiness of the data gateways, the rights, the methodology and the execution, and not by the calendar itself.

08 OKO / EQUILIBRIUM

Function: Watch and Balance → Result: Threat Map and Capabilities

EQUILIBRIUM is the intellectual contour of observation, analysis, forecasting and control of national balances. He does not make power decisions; his task is to show deviation, probable cause, consequences of inaction and possible points of influence in a timely manner.

QuestionSystem responseManagement product
What's going on?Fact, dynamics, spatial pictureSituational map
Is it a norm or a threat?Comparison with Range and TrendDeviation class
Why not?Connections of flows, events and decisionsHypothesis of causes
What happens next?Prognosis and stress scenariosWarning Window
Where to influence?Nodes with maximum sensitivityLever Set
What changed after the action?Fact vs. scenario and planEvaluation of the result
  • The index shows the balance, but does not hide the primary indicators and critical failures.
  • Signals are divided into facts, forecasts, scenario estimates and expert assumptions.
  • Closed data is processed in a sovereign protected loop; the open part contains allowable aggregates.
Early warning. Monitoring → recognition → forecast → Warning → Resource mobilization → response → Recovery → control of the result.

09 IAC and digital twin

Function: Prepare Solutions → Result: Modelled Consequences

The IAC translates the EQUILIBRIUM signal into a management question, collects cross-industry data, forms alternatives, and tests them on a digital twin of a country, industry, or territory.

StageAction IACQuality control
1. ProductionObject, purpose, boundaries, term, authorityUnambiguous question
2. Reference lineFact, base, relationships, limitationsData Passport
3. AlternativesAt least two options and the option of inactionComparable conditions
4. ModellingDirect, Indirect and Territorial EffectsVersion of model and assumptions
5. RiskStress-test, continuity, reversibleCritical thresholds
6. DecisionMatrix "effect - resource - risk - time"Scenario passport
7. TrainingComparison of the forecast with the resultCorrection of the model

The Leontief model is used for intersectoral scenarios: Δx=(I−A)⁻¹Δy. The multiplier and value added are treated as scenario estimates; they become proven causal effects only when supported by a verified counterfactual comparison.

Result. Prior to the launch of the project, the state sees a likely impact on related industries, territory, budget, critical resources, personnel and environmental obligations.

10 Sovereign Data Outline

Function: Establish Origin and Rights → Result: Trusted Data Environment

The system does not require uncontrolled unification of all arrays. It introduces a single directory and access rules, storing data from legitimate owners. Exchange is built through passports, API/gateways, event logs and role powers.

LayerMinimum compositionMode
IdentityCorporation, project, asset, territory, indicator, periodUniform codes
OriginSource, date, method, owner, signature, versionMandatory Audit - Follow
RightsBasis, purpose of processing, term, recipientThe least privileges
QualityCompleteness, relevance, consistency, errorAutocheck + Expert
SecurityClass, Segment, Encryption, Access LogOpen / Service / Closed
CorrigendumNew meaning, reason, author, timePrevious version is not deleted
  • Basic state outline: GAS "Management", FIS of strategic planning, GIIS "Electronic budget" and official statistics.
  • SUR operates as a data federation and does not claim that all systems are already integrated in real time.
  • The digital twin stores links to evidence and versions, not uncontrollable copies of all primary arrays.

Source / legal basis: Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 761 from 19.06.2026 and No. 658 from 30.06.2015 in the current edition.

11 Heritage preservation archive

Function: Preserve Knowledge and Foundations → Result: Institutional Memory

Heritage preservation archive is the intellectual contour of continuity. It combines legal frameworks, documents, digital twins, standards, technological solutions and proven results so that the new management cycle does not begin with a loss of experience.

ObjectWhat RemainsPractical value
DecisionVersion, authorship, authority, protocol, alternativesReproducibility of choice
ProjectPassport, contract, stages, risks, resultsTransfer between teams
TechnologyRights, tests, standards, applicabilityReuse
AssetOrigin, condition, repairs, digital twinLife Cycle
HeritageClasses C1-C6, passport, storage, accessIntergenerational transmission
EvidencePrimary data, method, signature, hashAudit and verification
Principle of law. The property remains with the rightful owner or custodian. The system provides identification, preservation, proof of origin and controlled access.

The “Heritage Connect” gateway can link a passport with storage, insurance, logistics, government services, research and education. Investment use is allowed only in a separate legal regime and does not replace the protection of heritage.

12 SFERA

Function: Structure Initiatives → Result: Single Register of Design Designs

SFERA — the input contour of initiatives from authorities, state corporations, science, business, regions and society. It separates the idea from the finished project and translates the proposal into a comparable passport.

Passport fieldContentsCondition of passage
Issue addressedObserved deviation and affected balancesThere is a confirmed baseline
ResultChange for citizens, territory, industryThere is a measurable
DecisionTechnology, method, life cycleVerified feasibility
ParticipantsOwner of the result, customer, executorsNo conflict of authority
ResourcesCapital, capacities, personnel, data, rightsSources pre-confirmed
RisksAddictions, side effects, safetyCritical thresholds identified
EvidenceDocuments, calculations, testsMaterials are available for verification
  • Initiative gets status: signal → Design → concept → secured project → Pilot → Scaling → Completion.
  • The refusal or refund is accompanied by a reason; the history is not deleted and can be revised if the conditions change.
Withdrawal SFERA. Not a presentation of an idea, but a comparable passport ready for the IAC scenario and contractual assembly ECO‑PPA.

13 ECO‑PPA

Function: Link Commitments and Resources → Result: Secured Project

ECO-PPA is a contractual and financial-resource framework that turns an agreed upon idea into a set of obligations. The name PPA is used here as a design model of a result agreement and requires legal qualifications for each type of transaction.

Block of agreementFixedMonitoring
State resultIndicator, base, target, deadline, recipientPassport balance
SubjectWorks, supplies, services, data, rightsTerms of Reference
ResourcesMoney, assets, capacities, raw materials, personnelConfirmation of source
Distribution of risksWho controls and who has consequencesRisk Matrix
PaymentStage, condition, acceptance, retentionRelationship to Proven Outcome
DataComposition, rights, safety, termsData Agreement
VerificationMethod, independence, class of evidenceESG‑IR
ChangesThreshold, procedure, version, terminationDecision log
Economic Connector. Task + Technology + Co-operation + Capital + Contract + Data + Result.

ECO-PPA does not waive budgetary, procurement, concession, corporate or industry law. For the pilot, a library of permissible contractual structures and a table of applicability are formed.

14 SPECZASHCHITA

Function: To organize cooperation and execution → Result: Executive Consortium

SPECZASHCHITA — cooperative contour of execution. It connects enterprises, scientific organizations, regions, suppliers, experts, and infrastructure operators around a specific outcome without assigning their assets and mandates.

FunctionMechanismResult
Consortium meetingVerification of competences, rights and resourcesApproved composition
DecompositionWorks, interfaces, control pointsThe Responsibility Matrix
Production cooperationOrders, capacities, quality, reservationThe Sustainable Chain
PilotingLimited contour, admission criteriaConfirmed technology
ScalingStandard modules and requirementsRepeated result
ResponseMobilization for threat or deficitRetention of function
CompletionReception, archive, lessons, resource releaseClosed life cycle
  • The unit of management is not the participant, but the obligation in the cooperation chain.
  • Critical operations have a backup performer, alternative material, or recovery plan.
  • The performance is confirmed by the primary data and is transmitted to ESG-IR and the Heritage Archive.
Border. SPECZASHCHITA does not replace a state customer, corporate body, technical supervision or licensing body.

15 ESG‑IR 1.0

Function: Measure and Confirm Impact → Result: Verifiable Result

ESG-IR is a standard of evidence for social, environmental and economic outcomes. It’s not about ranking: every statement is related to boundaries, formula, primary data, method, and responsibility.

ClassRequirementCoefficient c
APrimary data, signature, reconciliation and independent verification1,00
BInitial data and reconciliation; independent verification not completed0,85
CReproducible estimate with disclosed assumptions0,60
DNo source or calculation is non-reproducible0,00
  1. The boundaries of the object, period, base values, goals, weights and formulas are fixed before the assessment.
  2. Measured, calculated, forecast and expert data are marked separately.
  3. The numerator and denominator are separately tested; inter-corporate operations are eliminated.
  4. One effect is not counted to several participants in excess of one attribution.
  5. The fix creates a new version; the original record and the reason for the change are saved.
  6. For significant KPI, independent verification and selective testing of primary records is used.
Principle. There is no proof - no result achieved; the lack of data is not treated as a neutral value.

16 Intercompany chains

Function: Connect Competencies → Result: System Systems

State corporations and companies with state participation are considered as execution nodes, not autonomous owners of state goals. Cooperation is built around balance and project, with precise role delineation.

Corporate Contour*Main contributionRelated Balance Sheets
Finance and developmentStructuring and financing portfoliosInvestments, regions, technologies, exports
Industry and technologyPower, cooperation, critical productsIndustry, safety, work
Atoms and EngineeringEnergy, science, complex systemsEnergy, technology, ecology
Space and monitoringObservation, communication, navigation, dataDigital environment, security, territory
Transport and logisticsConnectivity and Supply ChainTransport, territory, exports
Housing and citiesEnvironment, public infrastructureHousing, water, ecology, demography
Social and cultural sphereAccessibility of services and human capacityHealth, education, heritage

* The matrix is a design proposal. Specific legal entities and powers are determined after analyzing the laws, statutes, strategies and decisions of the owner.

  • The owner of the national result is the government body; the leader of the corporate flow is responsible for the agreed portfolio.
  • The interface between the participants captures the input, output, quality, time, data, risk and reservation.
Effect. Duplication of projects is eliminated, critical chain breaks are revealed and a general plan of capacities, technologies and personnel appears.

17 Financing by Result

Function: Link Capital to Balance Sheets → Result: Secured Development Portfolio

The financial circuit combines federal and regional programs, corporate investment, development institutions, project financing and private capital at the portfolio level - without mixing legal sources.

LevelDecisionThe control question
National balanceResource limit and target effectWhat deficit is closed?
PortfolioPriorities and interdependencesWhich combination of projects is better?
ProjectCAPEX, OPEX, EAC, graph, incomeIs the cost of the life cycle complete?
ContractStages, payment, security, sanctionsWhat is considered execution?
AssetCondition, availability, repair, residual resourceHow is the function supported?
ResultFact, attribution, evidenceWhat has changed for the country?
  • A socially necessary but commercially disadvantageous function is taken into account separately and receives a transparent compensation mechanism.
  • The positive effect is not offset with damage, critical risk or an unfulfilled requirement.
  • The capital is allocated according to the project readiness, contribution to the balance sheet, risk, cross-industry effect and quality of evidence.
The portfolio principle. It is not the profit of one organization that is optimized, but the risk - the adjusted national result while maintaining the financial stability of the performers.

18 Technological and personnel sovereignty

Function: Identify dependencies → Result: Substitution and competence development programs

Each significant project is tested for critical dependencies on technologies, components, data, personnel, equipment, materials and intellectual rights. The register is associated with programs of science, education, production and procurement.

ObjectRegistry FieldsManagement action
TechnologyReadiness, rights, testing, alternativeR&D / License / Cooperation
Material / ComponentOrigin, criticality, stock, replacementQualification of supplier
EquipmentCondition, servicing, spare parts, tools and accessories, softwareReservation and localization
Data / AlgorithmOwner, jurisdiction, model, portabilityThe Sovereign Contour
CompetenceProfile, number, age, deficitTraining order and mentoring
KnowledgeDocumentation, media, successor, criticalityArchive and transmission
  • Corporate order for competencies is aggregated on the horizons 1, 3, 6 and 12 years.
  • The technology that has been validated and has given a confirmed effect, and not only completed R&D, is considered to be implemented.
  • Critical dependence is closed only after testing the alternative in a real production circuit.
The bundle. Science → Standard → Test → Production → Operation → Result Data → educational order update.

19 Sustainability and safety

Function: Prepare System for Shocks → Result: Continuity and Recovery

Sustainability is assessed not by the presence of a document, but by the ability to maintain a critical function and restore it to normative time. For each function, the minimum level of service, dependencies, reserve and the order of mobilization are determined.

ScenarioUnder reviewWithdrawal
Supply gapStock, alternative supplier, replacementSwitching plan
Infrastructure failurePower reserve, bypass route, autonomyContinuity plan
Cyber IncidentSegmentation, recovery, clean copiesResponse protocol
Deficit of staffDuplication of competencies, continuityReplacement plan
Natural threatMonitoring, thresholds, territorial consequencesEarly warning
Financial stressLiquidity, obligations, covenantsAnti-crisis scenario
Regulatory changeRights, terms of transition, costConformity Plan

Risk-adjusted index: ISBᴿᴬ = ISBᵍᵃᵗᵉ × (1−R) × (0,5+0,5U), where R is the expected loss of the result, U is the saving function taking into account the recovery time. Index, risk and sustainability are also shown separately.

Invalid compensation. High profits cannot cover the failure of security, technological independence or mandatory state result.

20 100-day pilot

Function: Check Architecture → Result: Working Minimum Cycle

The pilot is mainly managerial and digital. Its scale is the estimated offer: 3–5 corporate members, 2–3 territories, 5 interrelated balances and 10–15 projects. The specific composition is approved by the employer.

TimeframeActionsBenchmark
1–10Customer, Mandate, Participants, Balance Sheets, TerritoryPilot's passport
11–25Inventory of strategies, assets, data, projectsReference line
26–40Classifier, balance sheets, data agreementsUnified data model
41–60Minimum digital twin and three scenariosScenario passports
61–75SFERA, ECO-PPA, executive consortiaSecured portfolio
76–90Performance control, ESG IR, stress testResult and Risk Panel
91–100Full cycle, adjustment, final reportDecision on the next wave
The criterion of success. At least one signal has to go the full way: data → analysis → solution → Agreement → execution → Proof → Adjustment of balance.
  • Capital-intensive actions - only within the framework of already approved programs and powers.
  • On the 25th day, the baseline, formulas and target thresholds are fixed; retrospective fit is excluded.

21 KPI, index and control

Function: Measure and Correct → Result: Control Panel and Action Register

Taking into account the methods of the Government, it is advisable to keep no more than 10 rewarded upper-level KPI, and use additional indicators as diagnostic and risk control. For each corporation, the set adapts to a special mandate.

Upper level KPI (up to 10)Diagnostic indicators
1. Achievement of state result11. Critical external dependencies
2. Checkpoints on time12. Implementation of validated technologies
3. Beneficiary coverage by normative output13. Environmental intensity
4. Implementation of the production program14. Frequency of serious incidents
5. Technical availability of assets15. Continuity and recovery time
6. Labour productivitySeparately: evidentiary class ESG-IR
7. Cost of life cycleSeparately: risk and safety tolerances
8. Covering liabilities in cash flowSeparately: data quality and relevance
9. Share of internal value addedSeparately: cross-industry attribution
10. Cross-sectoral contributionSeparately: corrective actions

Integrated Strategic Balance Index: ISB = 100 × exp(Σ vₖ ln max(ε,Bₖ)). Geometric aggregation limits the compensation of the failure of one block to the success of another; mandatory requirements are applied as separate access gateways.

Three-level control. Automated data and limits control → Internal audit of the corporation → Risk-oriented external audit of legality and final state result.

Source / legal basis: Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 3579-r in the current version; special laws on state corporations.

22 Road map 2026–2036 and proposed solutions

Function: Scale by Readiness → Result: National Balance Sheet System

PeriodStageResult
2026Concept and 100-day pilotVerified minimum cycle
2027–2028The First WavePriority corporate and territorial contours
2029–2030Federation of Balance SheetsComparable passports, data and portfolios
2031–2033Predictive managementRegular scenarios and early warning
2034–2036Mature systemContinuous cycle of decision, execution and correction

It is proposed to issue an order of the Government:

  1. determine the federal customer, the pilot’s head and the interdepartmental working group;
  2. approve 5 balances, territories, participants and data admission criteria;
  3. prepare a single passport of the state mandate and a map of the legal perimeter;
  4. deploy IAC, minimum digital twin, SFERA, ECO‑PPA, SPECZASHCHITA, ESG>IR and Heritage Archive;
  5. on the 100th day to present the results, legal proposals, the next wave estimate and the decision to scale.
Bottom line. State corporations do not become parallel centers of policy, but specialized nodes of execution. The state gets an overall picture of assets, flows, risks and outcomes while maintaining legitimate mandates.

Main official sources

  • 172‑FZ "About Strategic Planning"
  • Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 309 of 07.05.2024
  • Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 761 of 19.06.2026
  • 7‑FZ About non-profit organizations, article 7.1
  • KPI Methodology, Order No. 3579

Published files

Strategy · Full published text

The Roles of Nations and Countries in the EQUILIBRIUM Operating System

Source Status: Primary Document

The material offers a functional architecture of the roles of nations and countries in the planetary equilibrium operating system.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/roli-natsii-i-stran-os-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Doctrinal version 1.0 • 24 August 2026

1. Purpose of the document

Roles of Nations is a module of OS EQUILIBRIUM that translates geopolitics from the logic of a permanent hierarchy to the logic of distributed functions and responsibility. Nation and state are not seen as “strong” or “weak,” but as carriers of specific abilities, commitments, and areas of utility for overall sustainability.

  • Preserve the sovereignty and cultural identity of states without turning diversity into a source of total conflict.
  • Linking influence to measurable responsibility: The greater the military, economic, technological, or resource power, the greater the liability to contain damage.
  • Create a clear role system for crises, development, recovery, humanitarian protection and civilizational dialogue.
  • Allow each country to have multiple roles at the same time and change them as the situation changes.
  • Eliminate the ideological division of the world into “right” and “wrong” states as the basis of the operating architecture.

2. Basic principles

Functionality. The role is assigned to actual capabilities, geography, resources, competencies, trust and the ability to create a socially useful result.

Plurality. One country can simultaneously be a balancer, a technology core, a mediator, a resource node, and a humanitarian donor.

Dynamic. The role is not fixed forever. It is revised depending on the crisis, historical period and real behavior.

Responsibility. Additional powers are always accompanied by additional restrictions, transparency and accountability.

Sovereignty. OS EQUILIBRIUM does not abolish state sovereignty and does not claim to form a supranational government.

Non-use of labels. Classification should not become a rating of civilizations, peoples or political systems.

Verifiability. Each role should be supported by indicators, not self-declaration or political prestige.

3. Twelve Functional Roles

1. Balanced States

Definition. They maintain a systemic balance between the largest centers of power; they can affect the security of several regions.

Function. Containment of escalation, strategic guarantees, participation in crisis formats.

Key responsibility. Increased transparency of strategic risks; prohibition to treat force as an unconditional right.

2. Stabilizing States

Definition. They maintain institutional, economic and diplomatic stability around them.

Function. Mediation, rule-keeping, building sustainable coalitions.

Key responsibility. Do not use the intermediary role as a cover for hidden pressure.

3. Mediators and Bridges

Definition. They have a working relationship with opposing centers and have the confidence to negotiate.

Function. Dialogue platforms, communication channels, exchanges, humanitarian agreements.

Key responsibility. Neutrality of the process, confidentiality and refusal to manipulate the parties.

4. Resource Cores

Definition. They have critical reserves of energy, food, water, raw materials or bioresources.

Function. Maintaining global viability and diversification of supply.

Key responsibility. Minimization of resource blackmail; ensuring the predictability of critical supplies.

5. Production cores

Definition. They concentrate large industrial capacities, supply chains and production competencies.

Function. Ensuring the sustainability of the material contour of the world economy.

Key responsibility. Avoid monopoly shutdown of critical goods if it creates a humanitarian catastrophe.

6. Technological Cores

Definition. They create critical technologies, infrastructures AI, microelectronics, communications, space and digital solutions.

Function. Development, standardization and safe dissemination of technologies.

Key responsibility. Control of dual-use, cyber risks and autonomous systems.

7. Financial and investment nodes

Definition. Provide capital, settlements, insurance, clearing and long-term financing.

Function. Maintaining liquidity, investment corridors and recovery mechanisms.

Key responsibility. Transparency, countering financial coercion, corruption and shadow flows.

8. Logistic nodes

Definition. Control or maintain straits, ports, transport corridors, aviation and rail crossings.

Function. Connectivity of continents and sustainability of supply.

Key responsibility. Guarantees of passage for humanitarian and critical cargoes in agreed regimes.

9. Civilizational Cores

Definition. They have a large-scale cultural, historical, religious or linguistic influence.

Function. Maintaining the dialogue of civilizations and reducing identity conflicts.

Key responsibility. Rejection of the dehumanization of other peoples and cultural expansion through coercion.

10. Scientific and educational centers

Definition. They create knowledge, training standards, research networks and human capital.

Function. Joint research, open science in safe areas, training.

Key responsibility. Protect academic integrity and prevent the politicization of basic science.

11. Humanitarian donors and rescue facilities

Definition. They have the capabilities of rapid assistance, medicine, food and civil protection.

Function. Responses to disasters, wars, epidemics, migration and climate crises.

Key responsibility. Non-discriminatory access to aid and separation of humanitarian mission from military pressure.

12. Areas of increased vulnerability

Definition. They are at the intersection of military, climate, social, resource or institutional risks.

Function. They are a priority for early warning, protection and recovery.

Key responsibility. Vulnerability status does not mean limiting sovereignty; it activates support and preventive measures.

4. Role assignment matrix

The role should be calculated on the basis of a set of provable factors. It is proposed to use a multi-criteria matrix of eight dimensions:

MeasurementWhat is evaluatedWeight in Role
Geographystatus, transit, neighbourhood, access to seas and key corridors0–100
Resourcesenergy, water, food, minerals, biodiversity0–100
Economyscale, sustainability, production chains, trade connectivity0–100
TechnologyScience, Digital Infrastructure, Industrial Complexity, AI0–100
Securitymilitary capability, deterrence and protection capability0–100
Trustreputation of the mediator, contractual capacity, predictability0–100
Culturelanguage, religion, history, humanitarian and civilizational influence0–100
Contributionreal action on stabilization, humanitarian assistance, development and rehabilitation0–100

Important: the weight of the criteria changes according to the scenario. For the food crisis, the resource and logistics functions are more important than the military; for the cyber crisis, they are technological and trusting.

5. Levels of participation

Level A is a global function. A country can influence the sustainability of several regions or the entire system.

Level B is a macroregional function. The country is critical to one major region and several cross-border contours.

Level C is a regional function. The country ensures the sustainability of neighboring states, corridors or industries.

Level D is a specialized function. The country has a unique competence: mediation, water, logistics, medicine, technology, science, etc.

Level E is the priority of protection. A country or territory requires a special support regime because of its cumulative vulnerability.

6. How countries interact in a crisis

  1. The OS sensor network records the crisis and determines the affected contours.
  2. The analytical module forms a map of the necessary functions, not based on political blocs.
  3. For each function, several potential executing states are identified to avoid monopoly.
  4. The Equilibrium Council reaffirms the temporary mandate of roles and limits of authority.
  5. The results are evaluated by indicators: risk reduction, access to assistance, maintaining coherence, reaching agreements.
  6. After completion of the acute phase, temporary roles are terminated or reverted to recovery mode.

7. Illustrative map of multifunctionality

Below is not a rating or a final consolidation of statuses, but an example of how large and medium-sized states can have several functions simultaneously. The specific role requires periodic verification.

CountryPossible functions in OS EQUILIBRIUM
Russiabalancer; resource and civilization core; scientific, production and logistics hub of Eurasia
USAbalancer; technological, financial, scientific and production core
Chinabalancer; production, technological, resource-logistical and civilization core
Indiastabilizer; civilizational, technological, scientific and production core; potential mediator
Brazilresource and food core; environmental stabilizer; regional mediator
Turkeymediator; logistics hub; regional stabilizer; civilization bridge
UAEfinancial, investment and logistics hub; mediator; humanitarian donor
Saudi Arabiaresource and investment core; regional stabilizer; mediator
South AfricaRegional stabilizer; Africa ' s industrial and financial hub; bridge to the global South
Indonesiamarine logistics hub; resource core; regional stabilizer; civilization bridge
Japantechnological, financial and scientific core; donor of recovery
Republic of Koreatechnological and production core; scientific and educational center
Switzerlandspecialized mediator; financial and humanitarian legal knot
Singaporelogistics, financial, technological and arbitration hub

8. Rights and obligations of the role-holder

Rights

  • participate in the appropriate coordination circuit
  • access to the necessary analytics and general data within the mandate
  • suggest scenarios and response protocols
  • Forming coalitions of execution
  • Recognize the contribution to sustainability

Obligations

  • not use the role to expand political control beyond the mandate
  • Publish performance indicators where it does not compromise security
  • respect the humanitarian minimum and the principle of proportionality
  • Independent verification of disputed results
  • Terminate special powers after the end of the relevant scenario

9. Protection from turning the OS into a system of domination

  • No country can single-handedly assign roles to others.
  • Critical functions should be duplicated by several States and institutions, to the extent possible.
  • The role is limited by time, task and measurable mandate.
  • National, religious or cultural affiliation may not be grounds for downgrading.
  • AI can recommend the distribution of roles, but does not have the right to independently issue a political mandate.
  • The role of the “area of increased vulnerability” is one of protection rather than of external governance.
  • Assessment of the contribution should be shared by the state, society, business and humanitarian institutions: their behavior does not always coincide.

10. Nations, States and Civilizational Communities

OS EQUILIBRIUM distinguishes three levels of subjectivity:

The state is a legal and political subject of international relations, the bearer of sovereignty and formal mandate.

Nation and people. historical and cultural community, which can exist both within one state and in several states.

A wider network of cultural, religious, linguistic, and historical ties that does not automatically coincide with political boundaries.

Principle: The cultural role of the people should not automatically become the foreign policy right of the state to speak on behalf of all the people of the culture concerned.

11. Passport of the country's role

For practical implementation, each country can have a digital “Passport of Role EQUILIBRIUM”, updated according to a single methodology.

  • Main and additional roles
  • Level of participation A-E
  • Key resources and competencies
  • Geographical contours of responsibility
  • Confidence and capacity to negotiate
  • Humanitarian response capabilities
  • Critical dependencies and vulnerabilities
  • Red lines and mandate constraints
  • History of international obligations
  • Available partnerships and coalitions
  • Indicators of contribution to recovery and development
  • Next revaluation of the role

12. Strategic formula

The goal of the system is not to unify the world, but to organize its diversity so that the strength, resources, culture, technology and geography of different countries become not only sources of competition, but also instruments of general balance.

Annex. Universal country assessment map

RoleCapacityResponsibilityResult indicator
Balanced States0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script
Stabilizing States0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script
Mediators and Bridges0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script
Resource Cores0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script
Production cores0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script
Technological Cores0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script
Financial and investment nodes0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script
Logistic nodes0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script
Civilizational Cores0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script
Scientific and educational centers0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script
Humanitarian donors and rescue facilities0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script
Areas of increased vulnerability0–100low / medium / highis specified according to the script

The document is the conceptual basis for the further development of the Register of Roles of Countries, the digital map of the world EQUILIBRIUM and the protocols of crisis-related functions.

Other published edition: ROLES OF THE NATION_ROLLS_OS_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

Functional architecture of planetary equilibrium

The country is not a label and not a place in the hierarchy.

A country is a set of functions, responsibilities and contributions to sustainability.

Version 1.0 • 2026

1. The principle of role distribution

From strength and status to functions and responsibilities

RESOURCES

What the country can really give the system

ROLE OF COUNTRY =

GEOGRAPHY

What components, routes and risks does it connect?

CULTURE

What civilization codes does it carry?

COMPETENCES

It can stabilize better than others.

RESPONSIBILITY

How to limit your own power

Key principle: the greater the influence of the state, the higher its obligations to prevent systemic damage.

2. Twelve Functional Roles

One country can simultaneously play several roles

Balancer

Stabilizer

Mediator

Resource Core

Technological core

The Civilizational Core

Logistic node

Financial Node

Humanitarian guarantor

Environmental Custody

Innovative polygon

Vulnerability node

Roles are dynamic: they are assigned to a specific crisis, region and context.

01. STATE-BALANCER

Maintains systemic balance and limits of escalation

FUNCTION

RESPONSIBILITY

• participation in key safety circuits

• Prevention of unilateral domination

• strategic deterrence

• increased restrictions on the use of force

• transparent red lines

• Duty to maintain de-escalation channels

Illustrative examples

USA • China • Russia

Examples show possible functions, rather than entrenching a country's permanent status.

02. STABILIZER STATE

Supports institutional and regional sustainability

FUNCTION

RESPONSIBILITY

• Diplomacy and norm-setting

• Maintaining economic connectivity

• Formation of compromise coalitions

• do not convert rules to exclusion tool

• to provide negotiation passability

• to assume part of the costs of stabilization

Illustrative examples

India • Germany • France • Indonesia

Examples show possible functions, rather than entrenching a country's permanent status.

03. MEDIATOR AND BRIDGE

Connects parties who can't speak directly

FUNCTION

RESPONSIBILITY

• communication channels and negotiation platforms

• Exchanges and Local Agreements

• Transit between conflicting systems

• Trust and Privacy

• Minimization of conflicts of interest

• Refusal to manipulate mediation

Illustrative examples

Turkey • UAE • Qatar • Oman • Switzerland

Examples show possible functions, rather than entrenching a country's permanent status.

6. Three cores: resource, technology, civilization

Physical, technological and semantic sustainability of the world

04. Resource Core

05. Technological core

06. The Civilizational Core

Energy, water, food, raw materials.

Responsibility:

• Reliability of supply

• Avoidance of critical blackmail

• Standby Stability Mechanisms

Examples: Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Canada, Australia

AI, microelectronics, space, digital platforms.

Responsibility:

• Technology security

• dual-use restrictions

• compatible trust protocols

Examples: USA, China, Japan, South Korea

Cultural codes, religion, historical memory, language of meanings.

Responsibility:

• reduction of civilizational hostility

• Cultural channels of dialogue

• Refusal to dehumanize

Examples: India, China, Russia, Iran, Arab world

7. Six operational roles

Contours without which equilibrium remains a declaration

07. Logistic node

08. Financial Node

sea, land and digital corridors

Singapore • Turkey • Netherlands

calculations, guarantees, insurance, reservation

Switzerland • UAE • Singapore

09. Humanitarian guarantor

10. Environmental Custody

corridors, medicine, evacuation, protection of civilians

Neutral States + International Institutions

biosphere, water, forests, ocean, climate assets

Brazil • Indonesia • DR Congo •

11. Innovative polygon

12. Vulnerability node

rapid testing of models of the New Order

Estonia • Singapore • UAE • Rwanda

place of concentration of conflicts and systemic risks

Crisis areas and transition states

8. Passport of the country's role

Single format for assigning, validating and revising functions

1–3 functions where the country's contribution is maximum

Main roles

Global / Regional / Crisis

Context of the role

resources, technologies, institutions, culture, geography

Assets

what the country is committed not to do and what to support

Obligations

Measurable contribution to sustainability

Metrics

The role is not eternal - it is regularly overestimated

Date of revision

Role ≠ Privilege

9. Levels of participation A-E

The degree of responsibility depends on the systemic influence

Systemic

Global consequences of decisions

Maximum responsibility

Continental

Impact on the macroregion

High responsibility

Regional

Sustainability of Neighbouring Countries

Shared responsibility

Local

important specialized function

Point Commitments

Vulnerable

High dependence on the external environment

Priority Protection and Recovery

The level of participation does not determine the dignity of the nation. He sets the scope of responsibilities in the system.

10. Illustrative matrix of countries

Example of multi-role distribution — without fixed labels

Country

Role 1

Role 2

Role 3

USA

Balancer

the Technological Core

Financial Node

China

Balancer

the Technological Core

Resource and Industrial Core

Russia

Balancer

Resource Core

Civilizational Core

India

Stabilizer

Civilizational Core

the Technological Core

Turkey

Mediator

Logistic Node

Regional Stabilizer

UAE

Mediator

Financial Node

Innovation Range

Brazil

Resource Core

Environmental Custody

Regional Stabilizer

Singapore

Logistic Node

Financial Node

Innovation Range

The matrix should be revised by data and context: the world is changing — roles too.

11. How Roles Are Involved in the Crisis

The OS assigns functions not by block affiliation, but by usefulness for de-escalation

KIND OF VULNERABILITY

BALANCES

MEDIATORS

STABILIZERS

NUCLEAR

WARRANTY

Where the crisis occurs

Limits to escalation

Open channels of contact

Assemble a Negotiating Structure

support resources, technologies and meanings

Protecting the humanitarian minimum and rebuilding

The goal is that no country bears the entire crisis and no power can monopolize the solution.

12. Protection from the new hierarchy

The functional system must be protected from turning roles into privileges

There are no eternal roles.

No monopoly on arbitration

Each function is reviewed regularly

solutions are distributed between different contours

There is no inherited privilege

Right to Disagree

influence does not give an unconditional right to decide for others

The participant may challenge the role and methodology of the evaluation

There are transparent metrics

There is a priority of life

status is confirmed by contribution, not declarations

The humanitarian minimum is higher than the geopolitical gain

13. Final architecture

The world as a network of functions, not a hierarchy of power

Stabilisation

Mediation

Balance

Resources

OS

EQUILIBRIUM

Logistics / Finance

Technology

The humanitarian minimum

Ecology

Country = function + responsibility + contribution to sustainability

Published files

Strategy · Full published text

Russian World. Goals • Strategy • Structure

Source Status: Primary Document

GOALS • STRATEGY • STRUCTURE

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/russkii-mir-tseli-strategiya-struktura

Open on the site

The Concept of Civilizational Development XXI centuries

MEANINGDEVELOPMENTCREATION

Version 1.0 • 2026

SUMMARY

The Russian world is considered in the present concept not as a closed ethnic or confrontational model, but as an independent civilizational system based on the Russian language, historical memory, cultural continuity, scientific and technological development, justice, cooperation and responsibility for the future.

The main task is to move from the preservation of identity to the creation of the image of the future: to create a space that attracts the quality of education, culture, science, infrastructure, public institutions and opportunities for people.

Key principle

The Russian world should not be defined by who it exists against, but by what it is able to create and offer to the world.

I. GOALS OF THE RUSSIAN WORLD

1. Civilized Sovereignty

Preservation of the ability to independently form development goals, educational model, information environment, scientific and technological agenda, financial and management tools.

2. Human conservation and development

Demography, health, quality of education, culture, dignity of work, opportunities for self-realization and continuity of generations.

3. Forming the image of the future

Own philosophy of development, design of the society of the era of artificial intelligence, long-term scientific and technological planning and an attractive cultural image of the future.

4. Cooperation space

Developing ties between Russian regions, compatriots and partners through education, culture, economy, technology, infrastructure and humanitarian cooperation.

5. Scientific and technological independence

Critical technologies, fundamental science, engineering schools, production chains and own digital platforms.

6. The Economics of Creation

Transition from the priority of the commodity and speculative model to production, infrastructure, science, cooperation, long-term investment and human capital.

7. Cultural subjectivity

Support for language, literature, film, music, art, historical memory and contemporary cultural productions.

8. Multipolar international cooperation

Development of mutually beneficial relations between states and civilizations without the requirement of cultural unification.

II. PRINCIPLES

PrincipleContents
PersonThe goal of development, not the system’s resource.
CreationThe legitimacy of the strategy is confirmed by real results.
Unity and cooperationAbility to join forces without suppressing the individual.
FairnessEquality of dignity, clear rules and social mobility.
SovereigntyAbility to make key decisions on their own.
PluralityThe Russian world as a space of cultural coexistence and common civil future.
ScienceDistinguishing between proven knowledge, hypotheses, philosophy and worldview models.
Openness to the worldCooperation without dissolving one's identity.

III. STRATEGIC ARCHITECTURE

The strategy is built as a system of interrelated contours. Weakness of any one circuit reduces the stability of the entire civilization model.

1. Smyslovay

Philosophy, values, language, historical memory, image of the future, social contract.

2. The Cultural Contour

Film, literature, music, museums, theatre, digital art, media platforms and cultural diplomacy.

3. Educational contour

School, university, engineering education, mentoring, continuous learning, development of thinking and civic responsibility.

4. Scientific outline

Fundamental science, applied research, interdisciplinary centers, large scientific installations and international programs.

5. Technological contour

AI, microelectronics, energy, space, robotics, biotechnology, materials, communications, quantum systems.

6. Economic contour

Production, infrastructure, cooperation, long money, project financing, social and technological investments.

7. Public management contour

Strategic planning, situational centers, analytics, digital state, risk assessment and feedback.

8. Spatial contour

Cities, small territories, Arctic, Far East, transport corridors, energy and digital networks.

9. International contour

Eurasia, BRICS, CIS, global South, scientific, educational, humanitarian and technological cooperation.

10. Ecological contour

Conservation of natural capital, monitoring, climate adaptation, ecosystem restoration and responsible environmental management.

IV. MAN AS THE CENTER OF THE SYSTEM

A civilizational project is sustainable only when its development is measured not only by GDP, output or military power, but also by the quality of a person.

  • physical and mental health;
  • education and the ability to learn;
  • professional competence;
  • cultural level;
  • responsibility and ability to cooperate;
  • creativity;
  • Access to social mobility;
  • ability to create a family, a business, a scientific or cultural result.

The goal of the educational model should not be a “consumer of information”, but an independent person who is able to think, create, work in a team and be responsible for the consequences of his decisions.

V. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Implementation of the strategy requires not just one organization, but a network of institutions linked by common goals, data standards and coordination mechanisms.

ElementFunction
Strategic CouncilIdentifying long-term goals, priorities and performance criteria.
Information and Analytical CenterData collection, scenario modeling, forecasting, risk assessment, performance monitoring.
Scientific and Technological CouncilPrioritization of critical technologies, examination of programs, science and industry relations.
the Council of Culture and EducationLanguage, educational policy, cultural programs, media environment, international humanitarian projects.
Territory development contourRegional strategies, urban programs, infrastructure, employment and environmental quality.
Outline of project financingFunds, banks, development institutions, bonds and other legal mechanisms for long-term financing.
Platform of cooperationThe unification of the state, business, science, public organizations and citizens around specific projects.
International NetworkEducational, cultural, scientific, business and technological representations and partnerships.

VI. DIGITAL CONTOUR AND EQUILIBRIUM

Within the framework of project logic, EQUILIBRIUM can be considered as a supersystem of analytics and coordination: not as a replacement for state institutions, but as a tool for combining data, models, goals, projects and indicators in a single management contour.

  • Monitoring of key systems;
  • Scenario forecasting;
  • Map of risks and threats;
  • Register of projects and initiatives;
  • assessment of social, environmental and economic impact;
  • support of inter-agency and inter-sectoral cooperation;
  • visualization of spatial development;
  • monitoring of strategic indicators.

It is crucial that the digital circuit has legally defined powers, a transparent data access model, protection of personal information and independent audit mechanisms.

VII. ROAD MAP

Stage 1. 2026–2027

Formation of doctrine, audit of existing programs and institutions, creation of a system of indicators, launch of pilot analytical and educational projects.

Stage 2. 2027–2030

Creation of a network of competence centers, scaling of technological and cultural programs, formation of project financing, launch of international cooperation platforms.

Stage 3. 2030–2036

Integration of territorial, technological, educational and cultural contours; formation of a sustainable ecosystem of institutions of the Russian world.

Stage 4. 2036–2050

Transition from catching up development to creating their own world standards in science, education, culture, infrastructure and management.

VIII. INDICATORS SYSTEM

Area of workExamples of indicators
Demography and quality of lifelife expectancy, fertility, health, housing affordability, migration balance
Human capitalquality of school education, engineering and scientific competences, professional mobility
ScienceR&D costs, publications, patents, research facilities, share of world-class research
Technologyshare of domestic critical technologies, production competences, export of complex products
Economylabor productivity, investment, share of high-tech industries, sustainability of infrastructure
Culturecreation and export of cultural products, reading, attendance of cultural institutions, share of quality domestic content
Territoriesconnectivity, infrastructure, accessibility of social services, quality of urban and rural environment
International influenceeducational programs, scientific cooperations, cultural centers, joint technological projects

IX. KEY RISKS

Ideology instead of development

Substitution of real results with slogans reduces the credibility and attractiveness of the project.

Closure and isolationism

The rejection of international science, culture and technology exchange leads to lags.

Cult of the Past

Historical memory is important, but it cannot replace the project of the future.

Technological dependence

Critical infrastructure should not be entirely dependent on external suppliers.

Bureaucratization

Multilevel structures without measurable results turn strategy into document flow.

Social Inequality

If development does not improve the capacity of the majority of citizens, the civilizational idea loses its credibility.

Blurring of scientific standards

Philosophical and worldview models should not be passed off as scientifically proven theories without verifiable grounds.

X. PHILOSOPHICAL AND ANTHROPOLOLOGICAL LAYER

In the loaded concept "Consciousness as a phenomenon of the existence of the soul" offers an author's model that connects consciousness, soul, continuum, noosphere, memory and the phenomenon of movement. These provisions can be used as philosophical or ideological material in the development of the cultural and anthropological layer of the Russian world, but should not automatically be presented as an established scientific theory.

Practically valuable for civilizational design is the very posing of the question of a person as a carrier of consciousness, memory, meaning and responsibility. This allows us to bring to the center of the strategy not only the economy and technology, but also the development of personality, culture of thinking and the ability to make informed choices.

XI. FORMULA OF THE RUSSIAN WORLD

CONCLUSION

The Russian world will become a sustainable civilizational project only during the transition from a defensive identity to a creative strategy → Culture → Education → Science → Technology → economy → Territory → State → international cooperation.

The criterion of success is the ability to create people, institutions and projects of world level, which they want to join voluntarily.

Other published edition: RUSSIAN WORLD Russian_world_goals_strategy_structure.pptx · web text +

Objectives • strategy • structure

The project of civilizational development: people, culture, sovereignty, cooperation and the image of the future

MEANINGS

DEVELOPMENT

FUTURE

Strategic contour up to 2050

1. Reference position

The Russian world as a civilizational project, not just a geographical or political concept

Who we are

For what

What We Give to the World

Language

Historical memory

Multinational Civilization

The Cultural Code

Sobornost

Human Conservation

Equitable development

Sovereignty

Creation

Responsibility for the future

Science and culture

Cooperation of civilizations

Technology for people

Sustainable development model

A vision of the future

2. Mission and overall objective

Preserve the civilizational core and turn it into a source of development XXI centuries

CREATE A SUSTAINABLE CIVILIZATION OF THE FUTURE

HUMANITY

SOVEREIGNTY

CREATION

COOPERATION

FUTURE

development of personality, family, communities

technological, cultural, financial

science, production, infrastructure

Diversity of people and external partners

Long horizon and intergenerational responsibility

3. Principles

Rules that keep strategy from becoming a slogan

The meaning above the form

The future is more important than nostalgia

The idea should lead to measurable results.

Heritage is a resource for development, not a substitute for development

Diversity within Unity

Science + ethics

common framework without unification of peoples and cultures

Technology must strengthen people and society

Sovereignty without isolation

Service and Responsibility

Independence in open cooperation

Authorities and institutions are assessed by social impact

4. Ten strategic objectives

Goals form a single system - from a person to the international contour

Preservation of the people

Cultural sovereignty

Education at a new level

Scientific and technological leadership

Production base

Financial sovereignty

Digital infrastructure

Development of territories

Eurasian Cooperation

A vision of the future

5. Strategy: seven levels of action

Each level has its own institutions and tools, but works towards a common goal.

Meaning and culture

People and education

Science and technology

Economy and production

State and institutions

Territories and infrastructure

International cooperation

Logic: Meaning → person → Competences → Production → institutions → Territory → External cooperation

6. Structure of the Russian World

Core, contours and coordination mechanism

THE CHOICE OF THE FUTURE

EXTERNAL CONTOUR

CULTURE

TERRITORIES

CIVILIZATION

NUCLEAR

HUMANITY

STATE

SCIENCE

ECONOMY

7. Institutional architecture

Not one organization, but a coherent network of institutions

Smyslovay

Project domain

Financial Outline

Management Outline

Culture

Education

History

Media

Expert communities

Science

Engineering

Business

Cooperation

Project Offices

Development banks

Funds

Long capital

Social finance

PPP

State

Regions

Municipalities

IAC

Strategic Platforms

8. Digital circuit: EQUILIBRIUM

Information and analysis add-on for observation, modelling and coordination

OBSERVATION

ANALYSIS

FORECAST

DECISION

CONTROL

data • registers • monitoring

AI • scenarios • System Models

Risks • Opportunities • Early Warning

priorities • resources • project packages

Effect • feedback • correction

Purpose: to create a single field of facts, scenarios, goals, projects and measurable results - without substituting automation for a political solution.

9. Man as the main object of development

The strategy is evaluated not only GDP, but also the quality of human potential

Health

Longevity •

Meaning

Education

Goals • Ministry • Creation

Thinking • Competencies

Digital maturity

Family

HUMANITY

AI-Literacy • Security

children • intergenerational communication

Nationality

Culture

Responsibility • Participation

language • identity • creativity

Work

Skill • Decent employment

10. Road map to 2050

Not a one-time reform, but a consistent increase in the capacity of the system

2026–2030

2031–2035

2036–2040

2041–2050

Assembly

MASSTABING

RELATIONSHIP

LEADERSHIP

Registers • standards • pilots • institutes • personnel

Territory • Industry • Platform • Export of solutions

Unified contours of data, production, education and culture

Civilizational Attractiveness • Global Cooperation

11. How to measure the result

We need a system of indicators that connects values with a specific life change

Population and family

birth rate • migration • family stability

Health

life expectancy • healthy years

Education

functional literacy • engineering and AI-competences

Science

R&D • patents • implementation

Industry

share of high-tech products • performance

Culture

Russian • read • movies • cultural participation

Territories

Connectivity • Infrastructure • Environment Quality

Trust

Public Trust • Participation • Cooperation

Sovereignty

critical technology • data • finance

External attractiveness

Education • Culture • Technology • Partnership

12. Critical risks

A strong strategy must see its own vulnerabilities in advance

Nostalgia instead of development

Ideologization of science

Isolation

The past becomes a substitute for the future.

Political convenience displaces testability

sovereignty is interpreted as the rejection of exchange and competition

Centralization without feedback

Technological dependence

Breakdown of words and results

Solutions lose touch with territories and people

critical platforms and components remain external

The scale of rhetoric is higher than the ability to perform

RUSSIAN WORLD

Not a project against someone, but a project of what we can create.

MAN • CULTURE • SCIENCE • SOVEREIGNTY • COOPERATION • FUTURE

Strategic horizon: 2050

Published files

Strategy · Full published text

Connecting the World’s Best Projects

Source Status: Primary Document

The material collects global projects, infrastructures and development contours into a single system map.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/svyazannost-luchshikh-proektov-mira

Open on the site

Strategic Analytical Concept • version 1.0 • 2026

1. Document design

The best projects in the world should not be seen as isolated megaprojects, companies or technological programs, but as an interconnected system of flows. Artificial intelligence depends on computing infrastructure and energy; energy on materials, networks and finance; space on industry, navigation and communications; cities on data, transport, digital identity and management; biotechnology on computing, laboratory infrastructure and regulation; and global institutions on evidence-based data and funding mechanisms.

Therefore, the value creates not only a separate project. Maximum strategic value arises in connectivity nodes: where one project becomes the infrastructure for several others and where data, capital, energy, trust and execution pass between systems.

In this document 30 world projects and platforms are combined into a single map. The goal is not to show the rating of brands, but the architecture of modern civilization infrastructure and determine the place of the integration layer EQUILIBRIUM.

2. The seven main links

Intelligence and calculations. OpenAI/Stargate, Google DeepMind, Microsoft Azure, NVIDIA, AWS. This layer converts data and energy into computational intelligence.

Energy and resources. ITER, Tesla Energy, BYD, NextEra, ?rsted and National Power Grids. This layer provides the physical work of the digital economy.

Space and planetary observation. SpaceX/Starlink, NASA Artemis, ESA, Rocket Lab, Blue Origin. It provides communication, navigation, Earth observation, and infrastructure expansion beyond the planet.

Finance and the Digital Economy. BlackRock, Stripe, Ant Group, Ethereum, Bitcoin and the infrastructure of digital settlements. This layer distributes capital, liquidity, and economic incentives.

Humans and Biotechnology. AlphaFold, Illumina, CRISPR platforms, Moderna, Neuralink and national health infrastructures. Here, data and calculations are transferred to human health and development.

Cities, Logistics and Industry. NEOM, Smart Nation Singapore, Amazon Logistics/AWS, Tesla/BYD, Digital Twins and Industrial Chains. This layer materializes digital solutions in space.

Global governance and development. United Nations, World Bank, International Standards, Climate and Infrastructure Programs. This layer links goals, regulation, funding, and scaling.

3. Map of 30 projects and their connections

№ProjectContourKey resourceConnectionsSystem Function
1OpenAI / StargateAI and computing infrastructureModels AI, data centers, calculationsPower grids; NVIDIA; Oracle; Microsoft; government and corporate systemsTransforms computing power into universal cognitive services
2Google DeepMindScientific AIModels, scientific calculations, AlphaFoldGoogle Cloud; Biology; Medicine; UniversitiesAccelerating the transition from data to scientific discovery
3Microsoft AzureCloud infrastructureCloud, corporate data, AI-servicesOpenAI; Governments; Industry; FinanceDigital Systems Deployment Layer
4NVIDIAComputational platformsGPU, accelerators, networks, AI factoriesAlmost all contour AI; digital twins; roboticsPhysical computing substrate AI
5Amazon / AWSClouds and LogisticsCloud computing, marketplace, logisticsRetail; cities; fintech; industryLinking Digital Demand to Physical Performance
6SpaceX / StarlinkSpace and communicationsLaunch, satellite Internet, StarshipClouds; defense; cities; remote territories; space agenciesGlobal connectivity and reducing the cost of access to space
7NASA ArtemisLunar infrastructurePilot program, scientific and industrial cooperationSpaceX; international partners; industryCreates a new contour of extraterrestrial infrastructure
8ESAInternational SpaceScience, Earth Observation, navigation, launchesEU; Copernicus; industrial companies; NASALinking Space with Environment, Safety and Industry
9Rocket LabSmall SpaceLaunching and space systemsSatellite operators; Earth observation; defenceReduces the barrier for specialized orbital services
10Blue OriginSpace infrastructureRockets, engines, lunar logisticsNASA; industry; space chainsExpands competition and production base of space
11ITERThermonuclear energyExperimental TokamakScience; materials; energy; States partiesLong-term platform for high-density energy
12Tesla EnergyElectrificationDrives, electric vehicles, energy managementNetworks; cities; AI; renewable energy generationConnects transportation, storage and distributed energy
13BYDMass ElectrificationEV, batteries, buses, power systemsCities; logistics; power gridsScales electric transport and battery chains
14NextEra EnergyRenewable energySolar, wind generation and gridsData centers; cities; industryDelivers low-carbon electricity for the new economy
15ØrstedOffshore energyMarine wind powerEuropean networks; industry; portsIntegrates the sea, energy and industrial infrastructure
16BitcoinDecentralized calculation layerPublic Value Transfer NetworkFinancial markets; data centers; energyCreated an independent digital form of scarce asset
17EthereumProgrammed economySmart contracts and tokenizationFintech; digital assets; identity; DAOAllows you to program economic relations
18BlackRock / AladdinGlobal capital managementInvestment infrastructure and risk analysisStates; companies; markets; infrastructure assetsRedistributing capital between sectors and projects
19StripeDigital paymentsAPI-payments and e-commerceMarketplaces; SaaS; startups; platformsReduces transactional barriers of the digital economy
20Ant GroupFintech ecosystemPayments, credit, data, platform financeRetail; citizens; small business; digital identityCombines everyday services and financial circuit
21AlphaFoldBiology as a Computable SystemPrediction of protein structurePharma; universities; biotech; medicineAccelerates the scientific cycle from hypothesis to molecule
22IlluminaGenomic infrastructureSequencing and genomic dataMedicine; biotech; research centersCreates a flow of biological data for personalized medicine
23CRISPR-platformsGenome EditingGenetic engineeringGenomics; pharma; clinics; regulatorsMoving from reading the genome to its target change
24Moderna / mRNAProgrammable BiomedicinemRNA platformAI; clinical data; production; regulatorsTurns biological instructions into a scalable platform
25NeuralinkBrain-machine interfaceImplantable NeurointerfacesAI; medicine; robotics; neuroscienceCreates a direct interface between the nervous system and computation
26NEOMThe City as a MegasystemEnergy, transport, digital environment, constructionAI; RES; logistics; investments; waterMulti-technology integration in one space
27Singapore Smart NationThe Digital StateDigital identity, data, transport, e-governmentFintech; urban sensors; healthcare; logisticsDemonstrates the integration of the state and digital infrastructure
28the UN / SDGsGlobal framework of goals17 SDGs and international coordinationStates; business; NPOs; international banksDevelops a common language of development goals and indicators
29World BankFinancing for developmentInfrastructure, digital and social programmesStates; private capital; international institutionsTranslating Development Goals into Funded Programs
30Copernicus / Earth ObservationPlanetary dataSatellite Earth Observation and Climate DataESA; EU; environment; agriculture; insurance; citiesCreates a common objective layer of data about the state of the planet

4. How projects form a single system

Chain A: AI → energy → Data Centers → Industry

OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and other AI systems require giant computing resources. Their scaling directly connects NVIDIA and server manufacturers with energy companies, grid infrastructure, construction, water supply, land and financial capital. As a result, AI ceases to be only a software sector and becomes a large industrial system.

Chain B: Space → communication → surveillance → territory management

SpaceX/Starlink, ESA and Earth Observation form the infrastructure through which remote territories receive communication, and states and companies receive data on climate, land use, disasters, logistics and security. This data then enters the cloud and AI and becomes the basis of the solutions.

Chain B: energy → electric transport → cities → digital platforms

Renewable energy, Tesla drives, battery chains BYD and digital city systems form a single contour. The electric car becomes not a separate product, but a mobile element of the power system, logistics and urban digital infrastructure.

Chain G: genomics → AI → Medicines → personalized medicine

Illumina creates genomic data; AlphaFold and other models convert biological data into predictions; CRISPR and mRNA platforms provide impact tools; clinical and regulatory systems provide application. This is a single technological pipeline.

Chain D: capital → infrastructure → data → new capital

Large capital managers, international banks and digital payment platforms finance infrastructure. Infrastructure produces data and services that create cash flows, ratings, tokenized assets, and new investment products. There is a cyclical system of capitalization.

Chain E: global targets → metrics → monitoring → financing

The United Nations sets the framework for goals; satellite and ground-based monitoring forms the evidence base; digital platforms calculate indicators; and international banks and investors fund programs. The weak point of today’s model is the gap between goals, data, responsibility and execution.

5. Matrix of interdependence

Outline 1Outline 2Communications ForceReason
AI and calculationsEnergyCriticalWithout energy and networks, computing growth is physically limited.
AI and calculationsSpaceHighSatellite data and communications become inputs to AI
AI and calculationsFinanceHighCapital finances infrastructure; AI automates finance
AI and calculationsBiotechCriticalScientific AI accelerates molecular design, genomics and diagnostics
EnergyCitiesCriticalUrban transport, data centers, water and buildings require a reliable energy supply
SpaceEcologyCriticalSatellite observation is one of the main sources of planetary data
FinanceInfrastructureCriticalWithout long-term capital, megaprojects do not scale
Global governanceDataHighSolutions become effective only with a verifiable evidence base
CitiesLogisticsCriticalPhysical flows of people and goods determine real productivity
BiotechRegulationCriticalWithout ethics, standards, and clinical control, technology cannot scale safely.

6. The main nodes of world connectivity

Computational node: chips + Data Centers + Cloud + Models AI + Data.

Energy node: generation + Network + Drives + demand management.

Planetary information node: satellites + sensors + digital twins + AI-prediction.

Financial Node: Capital + payments + insurance + ratings + digital assets.

Industrial node: materials + production + robotization + logistics.

Human Node: Education + Health + Biotechnology + Human-machine interfaces.

Institutional Node: Rules + Standards + Registries + Verification + Responsibility

7. What is missing at the global level

  • A single trusted layer that links goals, evidence, forecast, funding, and execution.
  • Full-fledged inter-sector digital twin: planet → country → region → city → enterprise → project.
  • A common system of evidence of results that can compare environmental, social, technological and economic effects.
  • An early warning mechanism that not only captures a threat, but automatically links it to authority, resources, and perpetrators.
  • Unified language of projects, assets, risks, indicators, technologies, liabilities and results.
  • An integration layer that does not replace existing platforms, but makes them compatible.

8. EQUILIBRIUM As an integration layer

In this architecture, EQUILIBRIUM is advisable to position not as another megaproject and not as a competitor to individual global platforms. Its potential role is the meta-layer of connectivity: a system that describes objects and processes in a single language, connects heterogeneous data, constructs an interdependencies graph, evaluates risks and effects, forms scenarios, and transfers tasks to execution circuits.

1. NEUROSVOD and hypergraph. unified model of objects, relationships, events, risks, resources and projects.

2. GASMP. Aerospace and ground monitoring, early warning and forecasting.

3. SFERA. space of initiatives, participants, events, knowledge and public cooperation.

4. ECO-PPA. outline of project packaging, evidence, resources, commitments and measurable impact.

5. SPECZASHCHITA. executive cooperative contour: enterprises, technologies, people, territories and pilots.

6. ESG-IR / validation. unified system of indicators, verification of results and trust.

7. IAC. center of decision-making: summary picture, scenarios, instructions, control of execution.

9. Connectivity Formula

The value of the system does not increase linearly with the number of connected projects. It depends on the number of useful links between them, the quality of the data, the credibility of these links and the ability to turn analysis into action.

RELATIONSHIP = DATA × TRUST × COMPATIBILITY × EXECUTION

10. Practical scenario: planetary problem

1. Observation - Satellites and ground-based sensors record changes in the state of the territory.

2. Verification - The data is compared with historical series, registers and independent sources.

3. AI-analysis - Models determine the probability of the threat, the source and possible scenarios.

4. Hypergraph - The system shows related objects: population, enterprises, infrastructure, ecology, contracts, powers.

5. Financial packaging - ECO-PPA determines the necessary resources and funding structure.

6. Cooperation - SPECZASHCHITA or other executive circuit forms a consortium.

7. Implementation - A pilot, project or set of measures is launched.

8. Control - GASMP and independent validation measure the result.

9. Scaling: A successful model becomes a standard, a standard project, or a replicable module.

11. Strategic Conclusion

The best projects of the world already form a protosystem of global civilization, but it is fragmented. Humanity has powerful elements — AI, satellite networks, thermonuclear programs, global capital, digital states, genomics, programmable finance and megacities. Their weakness is the lack of coherence between goals, data, resources, responsibility and performance.

Therefore, the next class of global projects is not necessarily another super-large company or a separate technology. These are systems of systems: integration architectures capable of safely connecting existing world capacities. For EQUILIBRIUM, this position is the strongest and most realistic: not to “replace the world”, but to create its observed, compatible, evidence-based and manageable connectivity.

12. Selection criteria for future partners EQUILIBRIUM

  • Having a unique resource: data, computing, energy, capital, infrastructure, technology or network.
  • API, standards or other technical integration capability.
  • Verifiable effectiveness and transparent evidence base.
  • Ability to pilot in a specific area or industry.
  • Compatibility with state, corporate and international requirements.
  • Ability to scale without destroying security and trust.
  • Willingness to work in a consortium model, where the independence of participants is preserved.

13. Actual reference points 2026

K 2026 The year has been particularly close AI, physical infrastructure and energy. OpenAI describes Stargate as a long-term circuit of computing infrastructure and 2026 the Year of Expansion of Computing Platforms and Energy Partnerships. ITER in July 2026 In the same year, he announced the installation of a sixth of the nine sectors of the vacuum chamber, that is, two-thirds of the toroidal core of the installation. These examples show the general trend: strategic digital and scientific systems are becoming more material, energy and infrastructure-intensive.

14. Sources and benchmarks

  • OpenAI. Building the compute infrastructure for the Intelligence Age. 29.04.2026.
  • OpenAI. Announcing The Stargate Project. 21.01.2025.
  • OpenAI. Building the infrastructure for the Intelligence Age in Michigan. 01.06.2026.
  • ITER Organization. Two-thirds of ITER tokamak core now in place. 29.07.2026.
  • ITER Organization. ITER Council notes continued progress across construction, commissioning, and licensing. 06.07.2026.
  • NASA Office of Inspector General. NASA’s Management of Programs and Projects after Mission Termination—Canceled or Repurposed Artemis Campaign Systems. 24.06.2026.
  • Official materials of the UN, the World Bank, ESA/Copernicus, companies and projects listed in the document should be used in the preparation of an expanded version with financial indicators, terms and KPI.

Other published edition: RELATIONSHIP OF THE BEST PROJECTS OF THE WORLD Connection_best_projects_of_the_world_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

30 Global Projects • 7 Contours • Unified architecture of systems

EQUILIBRIUM - integration layer of data, trust, compatibility and execution

Main thesis

Value arises not only within projects - it arises between them

DATA

COMPATIBILITY

RELATIONSHIP

TRUST

RELATIONSHIP = DATA × TRUST × COMPATIBILITY × EXECUTION

EXECUTION

7 World Connectivity Circuits

The framework on which the largest projects are going

AI and calculations

Model • Cloud • Chips

Energy

• Network •

Space

communication • navigation • surveillance

Finance

equity • payments • tokenization

Person

Genomics • Biomedicine • Interfaces

Cities and industry

logistics • transport • production

Management

Objectives • Standards • Development

30 projects as a single card

Not the rating of brands, but the architecture of mutual dependencies

AI and calculations

OpenAI / Stargate

Google DeepMind

Microsoft Azure

NVIDIA

Amazon / AWS

Space

SpaceX / Starlink

NASA Artemis

ESA

Rocket Lab

Blue Origin

Energy

ITER

Tesla Energy

BYD

NextEra

Ørsted

Finance

Bitcoin

Ethereum

BlackRock / Aladdin

Stripe

Ant Group

Person

AlphaFold

Illumina

CRISPR

Moderna / mRNA

Neuralink

Cities and management

NEOM

Singapore Smart Nation

the UN / SDGs

World Bank

Copernicus

Chain 1. AI Becoming an industrial system

The algorithm no longer exists apart from energy, land, networks, and capital.

Chips NVIDIA

Data Centers

Energy and Networks

Azure Clouds / AWS

Models AI OpenAI / DeepMind

System Conclusion

The growth of AI is limited not only by algorithms, but also by energy, infrastructure, supply chains and the cost of capital.

Chain 2. Space → data → territory management

Satellites are becoming a daily management infrastructure

STARLINK

CITIES AND LOGISTICS

SPACE SpaceX • ESA

CLOUD + AI

COPERNICUS OBSERVATION

ENVIRONMENT AND SAFETY

Chain 3. Energy → transport → city

Electrification transforms transport and buildings into energy system elements

RES NextEra / Zjrsted

Networking

Tesla's Dumplers

ELECTROTRANSPORT BYD / Tesla

SMART CITY

New logic of the city

Energy, mobility, buildings, charging infrastructure, digital tariffs and demand management are combined into a single territory operating system.

Chain 4. Genomics → AI →

From reading biology to computation and point impact

GENOMIC DATA Illumina

SCIENCE AI AlphaFold

EDITION CRISPR

mRNA-Platforms Moderna

INTERFACE - Neuralink

Systemic effect

Biology is becoming more and more computable: data, models, molecular tools and clinical platforms form a single technological pipeline.

Chain 5. Capital ↔ infrastructure ↔ data

Finance becomes a mechanism for setting up and scaling systems

INFRASTRUCTURE

CAPITAL BlackRock • World Bank

DIGITAL ECONOMY Stripe • Ethereum

DATA + KPI

Chain 6. Objectives → metrics → monitoring → financing

The main gap between the stated goal and proven performance

UN Goals/SDGs

METRICS Standards

Copernicus MONITORING

FINANCING World Bank

VERIFICATION OF RESULT

Executing projects

The Matrix of Critical Interdependence

Where one circuit is physically or institutionally dependent on the other

CONTOUR 1

CONTOUR 2

COMMUNICATIONS

WHY IT IS IMPORTANT

Energy

CRITICAL

The growth of computing depends on power and networks

Biotech

CRITICAL

Scientific AI changes the speed of research

Space

Ecology

CRITICAL

Satellites provide planetary measurements

Finance

Infrastructure

CRITICAL

Megaprojects require long capital

Cities

Logistics

CRITICAL

Physical Flows Determine Effectiveness

Biotech

Regulation

CRITICAL

Without standards, there is no safe scale

Space

HIGH

Satellite data becomes input AI

Management

Data

HIGH

Decisions without evidence are weak

7 nodes of world connectedness

It is in these nodes that strategic power is born.

Computation

chips • data center • clouds • AI

Energetic

Generation • Network • drives

Planetary

Satellites • Sensors • Digital Twins

Financial

equity • payments • insurance • ratings

Industrial

materials • production • robotization

Human

Health • Education • Interfaces

Institutional

Regulations • Standards • Registries • Liability

What is missing at the global level

Technology is strong; intersystem controllability remains fragmented

01

Single Trusted Layer "target → fact → action"

02

Cross-sector digital twin of the planet and territories

03

Comparative evidence of environmental, social and economic effects

04

Early warning related to resources and actors

05

Unified language of projects, assets, risks and liabilities

06

Integration without having to replace existing platforms

EQUILIBRIUM: not another project, but an integration layer

IAC

Position "system of systems"

NEUROSVOD and hypergraph

ESG-IR validation

EQUILIBRIUM

GASMP

SPECZASHCHITA

SFERA

ECO-PPA

Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

From monitoring to execution and scaling

1. OBSERVATION

GASMP • satellites • sensors

2. RELATIONSHIP

NEUROSVOD • Hypergraph • Registers

3. ANALYTICS

AI • Risks • scenarios • forecast

4. DECISION

IAC • Priorities •

5. RESOURCES

ECO-PPA • Finance • Commitments

6. EXECUTION

SPECZASHCHITA • Consortiums • Pilots

7. PROOF

ESG-IR • Validation • KPI

Scenario of "systems"

Example: planetary environmental or infrastructure threat

Observation

Verification

AI-analysis

Hypergraph

Financing

Cooperation

Implementation

Monitoring

Scaling

Key difference

The system does not end with analytics: it must bring the signal to the authority, resource, performer and proven result.

How to select projects for integration

Not “all with all”, but only connections that create measurable value

01

Unique resource

02

Technical integration

03

Verified result

04

Pilotability

05

Regulatory compatibility

06

Safe scaling

07

The Consortium Model

The Next Class of Global Projects

Not a separate technology, but a managed connectivity of technologies, institutions and resources

SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS

OBSERVE

UNDERSTAND

CONTACT US

ACTING

PROVE

EQUILIBRIUM can take a strong position not by replacing existing world platforms, but by creating their observed, compatible, evidence-based and managed connectivity.

Published files

Strategy · Full published text

Russia’s Transport and Industrial System, 2035–2050

Source Status: Primary Document

The master document and departmental package describe the target intersectoral architecture of transport, industry, science, energy, digital infrastructure, construction, ecology and...

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/transportno-promyshlennyi-kontur-rossii-2035-2050

Open on the site

Transport • Industry • Materials Science • Energy • digital infrastructure • Science • Security • Ecology

StatusDraft strategic concept
Horizon2035–2050
Basic frameworkTransport strategy of the Russian Federation to 2030 with a forecast to 2035
PurposeInterdepartmental coordination and formation of a portfolio of technological projects

Russia, 2026

1. Status and purpose of the master document

This document forms the project of the target intersectoral architecture "Transport and industrial contour of Russia 2035–2050". It does not replace the existing state strategies and programs, but offers a superstructure mechanism for coordinating transport, industry, science, energy, digital infrastructure, construction, ecology and financing mechanisms.

Horizon to 2035 the Year is considered as a support for the current Transport Strategy of the Russian Federation 2030 Year with forecast for the period up to 2035 years. Horizon 2035–2050 is a proposed framework for subsequent technological and infrastructure development and is subject to separate state strategic approval.

2. State statement of the task

By 2050, transport should not be considered as a set of individual types of transport, but as a single production and logistics system of the country, in which transport corridors, industry, materials, energy, communication, data and territorial development are jointly designed.

  • ensuring the coherence of the territory and the sustainability of the economy;
  • formation of technological sovereignty in critical transport technologies;
  • reduction of dependence on imported materials, components, software and hardware platforms and service equipment;
  • Accelerating the introduction of high-speed, automated and low-carbon transport where economic and technological feasibility has been proven;
  • creation of conditions for mass production of domestic transport equipment and infrastructure systems;
  • increasing the resilience of transport infrastructure to emergencies, climate and technological risks.

3. Target model: from industries to a single contour

Target model is based on the principle of end-to-end life cycle: state need → Scientific and technical assignment → material and technology → Production → transport infrastructure → Operation → Digital Monitoring → repair and modernization → reuse and recycling.

ContourWhat unitesMain FunctionResult to 2050
Transportrailways, highways, aviation, fleet, urban transport, logisticsSingle network and capacityConnectivity and Speed
Industrialengineering, instrumentation, electronics, construction industrySeriality and Localizationtechnological independence
Material Studiesalloys, composites, ceramics, coatings, battery materialsresource and characteristicsReducing the mass and cost of life cycle
Energeticpower grids, traction power, charging and hydrogen infrastructureenergy supplyScalable Energy Base
Digitaldata, AI, digital twins, communication, cyber resistanceReal-time managementPredictiveness and coordination
ScientificR&D, testing, testing, certificationAcceleration TRLrapid implementation
Territorialagglomerations, reference settlements, ports, hubsTransport and Accommodation LinkIncreased availability and business activity

4. Priority transport systems

4.1. Rail and high-speed circuit

  • development of main and high-speed railway corridors;
  • digital control of capacity and graphics;
  • domestic traction, car building, track systems and materials;
  • multimodal integration with aviation, motor transport and urban systems.

4.2. Road and autonomous transport

  • development of a road network and intelligent transport systems;
  • Electrification and alternative power plants for economically justified segments;
  • automated freight transportation on prepared corridors;
  • digital control of the technical condition of the infrastructure.

4.3. Aviation Outline

  • regional aviation accessibility;
  • development of domestic aviation equipment and materials;
  • integration of airports into transport and logistics hubs;
  • unmanned aircraft systems in civil and special permitted scenarios.

4.4. Marine, river and Arctic contour

  • port and terminal facilities;
  • The Northern Sea Route and Arctic Infrastructure Sustainability;
  • river logistics and development of inland waterways;
  • Ship materials, power plants and digital navigation.

4.5. Next Generation High Speed Systems

Maglev, vacuum-tube transport systems and Hyperloop solutions should be considered primarily as a scientific and technological direction with consistent validation of safety, energy, economics and maintainability. Before these parameters are confirmed, the correct state model is a testing ground, R&D and demonstrator, and not a pre-announced mass construction.

5. Industrial architecture

Transport order should be used as a mechanism for the development of domestic industry. For each major infrastructure project, it is advisable to form an industrial map: critical materials → components → equipment → production capacities → service → personnel.

  • transport engineering and traction equipment;
  • engines, power electronics, battery systems;
  • rail and road equipment, bridge and tunnel systems;
  • communication, navigation, sensors, computing and software;
  • port, airport and logistics equipment;
  • Repair and service infrastructure of the full life cycle.

6. Materials science as a cross-cutting technology

The national project "New Materials and Chemistry" creates an actual state framework for the development of composites, advanced materials and high-tech technologies. In the master course, transport is a large qualified customer for the materials industry.

Material / TechnologyTransport applicationsTested effectCriteria for admission
high strength steels and alloysrails, bridges, bodies, power unitsresource, mass reductionbench and full-scale tests
Aluminum and Magnesiumaviation, bodies, electric transportmass and energy efficiencyresource and corrosion resistance
Compositesaircraft, wagons, bridge elementsmass, repairabilitycertification and fire safety
ceramics and ultra pure oxideselectronics, insulation, coatingstemperature resistancetechnological repeatability
Rechargeable materialselectric transport, storagespecific energy, cyclesafety and recycling
Soil stabilizationroads, sites, basesthe time and cost of constructiongeotechnical validation

7. Energy transport circuit

  • advance planning of traction and charging infrastructure;
  • coordination of transport projects with the development of the electric grid complex;
  • local generation and storage at critical nodes;
  • hydrogen solutions - only in segments with a confirmed economy and security;
  • energy digital twin of large corridors and nodes.

8. Digital platform "EQUILIBRIUM Transport"

The digital platform is not seen as a single monolithic information system, but as a federative integration layer connecting industry systems by harmonized data models, identifiers, API, security requirements and access rights.

  • a single catalog of transport and industrial infrastructure;
  • digital twins of corridors, nodes and critical assets;
  • forecasting capacity, failures and repair needs;
  • through traceability of materials and components;
  • scenario modeling of cargo and passenger flows;
  • Cyber resilience, access segmentation, and import-independent technology stack for critical functions.

9. Interdepartmental management model

ParticipantRole in the circuitKey productBenchmark
Government of the Russian Federation / Project CommitteeInter-agency coordinationSingle RoadmapRemoval of cross-sectoral barriers
the Ministry of Transport of RussiaIndustry Customer and Transport Architectureportfolio of corridors and transport projectsconnectivity, capacity, security
Minpromtorg RussiaIndustrial securitymaps of localization and serial productionShare of domestic production
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of RussiaR & D and scientific cooperationportfolio of critical technologiesTransition to testing and implementation
The Mincifers of RussiaDigital Compatibility and Data Infrastructureintegration standards and trusted environmentData Accessibility and Cyber Resilience
the Ministry of Energy of Russiaenergy supplyenergy schemes of transport corridorsreliability of energy supply
Ministry of Economic Development of Russiaeconomy, investment, PPPModels of financing and impact assessmentpayback and multiplier effect
Minstroy RussiaConstruction and Territorial Integrationnorms and binding to the development of territoriesReduction of infrastructure restrictions
Ministry of Natural Resources of RussiaEnvironmental restrictions and monitoringEnvironmental claims and compensation measuresreduction of effects and evidence of effects
EMERCOM of Russia and profile servicesSustainability and ResponseContinuity of operation scenariosReadiness for the emergency

10. Industry and cross-industry project packages

Instead of one super-large program, a portfolio of interrelated project packages with unified selection, validation and monitoring methods is offered.

  1. "Speed": HSR, Maglev-R&D, automated corridors, transplant nodes.
  2. "Materials": critical materials, composites, coatings, alloys, battery materials.
  3. "Engineering": rolling stock, engines, traction, power electronics, service.
  4. "Energy": traction networks, charging, drives, local generation.
  5. "Digital transport": digital twins, AI, data, communication, cyber resistance.
  6. "Logistics nodes": ports, airports, dry ports, terminals, industrial parks.
  7. "Sustainability": reservation, maintainability, emergency situations, climate adaptation.
  8. "Personnel": engineering schools, competence centers, applied training programs.

11. Spatial Model: Corridor and Node System

A specific list of corridors should be determined on the basis of transport modeling, cargo base, passenger demand, industrial specialization, energy supply and life cycle cost. The following are candidate directions for comparative technical and economic analysis, rather than an approved construction plan.

  • Northwest and the Moscow-St. Petersburg corridor as a testing ground for high-speed and digital solutions;
  • Volga region - the Urals as an industrial and logistics axis;
  • South of Russia and the Azov-Black Sea basin as an export-agricultural and port contour;
  • Siberia — the Far East as a contour of capacity expansion, resource and export logistics;
  • The Arctic zone as a separate contour of sustainability, materials and autonomous energy.

12. Stage 2035–2050

PeriodFocusInfrastructureTechnologyManagement result
2026–2030Base preparationPilots and bottlenecksvalidation and localizationa Single Project Portfolio
2030–2035Implementation of the current transport frameworkmain corridors and nodesserial introduction of mature solutionsa bunch of industry programs
2035–2040first post-2035 cycleHigh-speed and automated segmentsscaling materials and digital twinsFederal Digital Coordination
2040–2045Interregional Integrationa Network of Large Logistics Clustersnew generation of rolling stock and energyLife Cycle Management
2045–2050Single Outlinea Multimodal NetworkNext Generation Technology after ValidationConstantly adapting and updating your portfolio

13. Project selection mechanism

Each project is proposed to pass through a single “filter of the state decision”.

  1. Strategic necessity: what state gap is closed.
  2. Demand: confirmed freight, passenger or infrastructure needs.
  3. Technological readiness: TRL, testing, certification, maintainability.
  4. Industrial readiness: localization, capacity, critical components and raw materials.
  5. Energy: available capacity and cost of energy supply.
  6. Life Cycle Economics: CAPEX + OPEX + repair + recycling.
  7. Ecology and territory: impact, compensatory measures, connectivity of settlements.
  8. Security and Sustainability: Resilience, Backup, and Cyber Risk.
  9. Scalability: the ability to repeat the solution in other regions.

14. Financial and economic model

  • federal and regional budget financing - for public infrastructure;
  • PPPs and concessions - in the presence of stable cash flow and correct risk distribution;
  • long-term offtake contracts - to start serial production of materials and components;
  • project financing - for commercially recouped nodes;
  • infrastructure bonds and other authorized instruments - with a confirmed financial model;
  • support of R&D and pilot industries - before the transition to mass demand.

Key principle: the comparison of options is made at the full cost of the life cycle and measurable socio-economic effect, and not only at the initial cost of construction.

15. System of key indicators

Block KPIExamples of indicatorsEvaluation principle
Connectivityaccess time, reliability, throughputbefore/after the project
Economytransportation cost, logistics costs, asset performanceLife Cycle
IndustryLocalization, seriality, export potentialConfirmed production chain
TechnologyTRL, the number of validated technologies, the deadline for serializationStage Gate
Securityaccident, fault tolerance, recovery timeRisk-based assessment
Ecologyenergy intensity, emissions, resource efficiencyLife Cycle Methodology
DigitalizationShare of assets with digital passports, data qualityinteroperability and completeness

16. Pilot of the federal inter-industry contour

It is proposed to start not with the creation of a new bureaucratic system, but with one end-to-end pilot on the selected transport corridor. The pilot should simultaneously include transport, materials, industry, energy, digital model, financing and impact assessment.

  1. Selection of the corridor and determination of 5–7 measurable problems.
  2. Formation of a digital passport of infrastructure and industrial chain.
  3. Selection of 10–20 technologies and materials with different maturity levels.
  4. Natural testing and validation of economic effects.
  5. Develop an interagency road map for removing barriers.
  6. Circulation of confirmed decisions to other corridors.

17. Management architecture "EQUILIBRIUM"

In the master document "EQUILIBRIUM" is used as a project name for the integration architecture, and not as a substitute for the powers of public authorities. Its function is to provide a unified view of the goals, objects, data, technologies, risks, timing and results of an inter-industry portfolio.

  • register of projects and dependencies;
  • matrix "agency - authority - result";
  • Register of critical technologies and materials;
  • production capacity map;
  • digital passports of corridors and nodes;
  • panel KPI and risks;
  • Scenario modeling up to 2050.

18. Proposed Federal Decision

It is proposed to consider the possibility of forming an interdepartmental working group to develop the concept of "Transport and Industrial Outline of Russia 2035–2050" and the preparation of a draft intersectoral road map synchronized with the current state documents of strategic planning.

  1. Determine the main coordinator and the composition of the participants.
  2. Conduct an inventory of existing transport, industrial, digital, energy and scientific programs.
  3. Create a single list of critical technological dependencies.
  4. Choose 1–2 inter-industry pilot corridors.
  5. Develop a system KPI and uniform rules for project selection.
  6. To prepare proposals on the horizon of the state transport and industrial policy after 2035.

19. Sources and normative support

1. Transport Strategy of the Russian Federation 2030 Year with forecast for the period up to 2035 approved by the Government of the Russian Federation from 27 November 2021 № 3363-r. Official publication of the Ministry of Transport of Russia: https://mintrans.gov.ru/documents/2/11577

2. Report on the implementation of the Transport Strategy of the Russian Federation 2030 Year with forecast for the period up to 2035 years. Reporting period: 2025 year. the Ministry of Transport of Russia, 3 June 2026: https://mintrans.gov.ru/documents/11/15616

3. National project “New Materials and Chemistry”. Official materials of the Government of the Russian Federation: https://static.government.ru/media/files/4X4afMw3dIEgNAo0Bb6ROm77fWR4uafr.pdf

Note: The indicators, corridors and horizons 2035–2050 proposed in this document are conceptual and require a feasibility study, regulatory and interagency justification.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM INTERIOR FEDERAL CONTOUR EQUILIBRIUM_Intersectoral_federal_contour.docx · Web Text +

Materials science • Transport • Speed systems

1. Purpose of the inter-industry circuit

The unified program "EQUILIBRIUM: Materials Science, Transport and Speed Systems" as a mechanism for coordinating ministries, science, industry, infrastructure and regions.

2. Participants and functional roles

  • Ministry of Transport of Russia — transport architecture and corridors
  • Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia — industrial cooperation and materials
  • Ministry of Education and Science of Russia — R&D and personnel
  • Russia’s Ministry of Finance — digital platform and data
  • Ministry of Energy of Russia - energy supply and accumulation
  • Ministry of Economic Development of Russia — economy, PPP and regulatory
  • Minstroy of Russia — linear infrastructure and construction technologies
  • Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia - environmental restrictions and monitoring
  • Russian Emergencies Ministry, Rostechnadzor, Rosstandart and other bodies — safety, norms, testing and certification

3. Management system

  • the Interagency Coordination Council
  • the Scientific and Technical Council
  • the Federal Pilot Directorate
  • a Single Data and Digital Twin Office
  • the Council of Industrial Partners and Investors

4. Nine technological contours

  • high-speed passenger systems
  • high-speed freight corridors
  • Magnetic Levitation
  • Hyperloop-type and rarefied-tube technologies
  • Materials Science and New Structural Materials
  • energy and storage
  • digital twins, AI and control
  • Ecology and Biocenosis Monitoring
  • certification, standards and safety

5. Single implementation cycle

The State's Need → Scientific and technical assignment → R & D → Material/component → Tests → Certification → Demonstrator → Pilot Corridor → Serial production → Operation → Digital Monitoring → Scaling.

6. Stages

  • 0–12 months: technology audit, feasibility study, choice of landfill and corridors
  • 1–3: Federal test site and technology demonstrator package
  • 3–7 years: pilot commercial sites and industrial localization
  • 7+ years: scaling into the network of strategic transport corridors

7. Federal level indicators

  • technology transition speed from TRL 4–6 to TRL 8–9
  • Share of Russian materials and components
  • Cost of life cycle
  • safety and reliability
  • Economic Impact on the Territory
  • Environmental efficiency
  • export potential

8. Organizational decision

It is proposed to form an interdepartmental working group of the federal level and the directorate of the pilot program with a unified project management system, a digital model, a technology registry and a transparent system of benchmarks.

9. Proposed first result

During the first year - the federal feasibility study, the choice of the landfill, the list of 20–30 critical technologies and materials, the architecture of the digital twin, the regulatory road map and the package of 3–5 demonstration projects.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM INTERIOR FEDERAL CONTOUR MATERIAL • Transport • Speed systems EQUILIBRIUM_Inter-industry_contour_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

Task

The unified program "EQUILIBRIUM: Materials Science, Transport and Speed Systems" as a mechanism for coordinating ministries, science, industry, infrastructure and regions.

Participants

Ministry of Transport of Russia — transport architecture and corridors

Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia — industrial cooperation and materials

Ministry of Education and Science of Russia — R&D and personnel

Russia’s Ministry of Finance — digital platform and data

Ministry of Energy of Russia - energy supply and accumulation

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia — economy, PPP and regulatory

Minstroy of Russia — linear infrastructure and construction technologies

Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia - environmental restrictions and monitoring

Russian Emergencies Ministry, Rostechnadzor, Rosstandart and other bodies — safety, norms, testing and certification

Management system

the Interagency Coordination Council

the Scientific and Technical Council

the Federal Pilot Directorate

a Single Data and Digital Twin Office

the Council of Industrial Partners and Investors

Technological contours

high-speed passenger systems

high-speed freight corridors

Magnetic Levitation

Hyperloop-type and rarefied-tube technologies

Materials Science and New Structural Materials

energy and storage

digital twins, AI and control

Ecology and Biocenosis Monitoring

certification, standards and safety

Programme Stages

0–12 months: technology audit, feasibility study, choice of landfill and corridors

1–3: Federal test site and technology demonstrator package

3–7 years: pilot commercial sites and industrial localization

7+ years: scaling into the network of strategic transport corridors

Federal KPI

technology transition speed from TRL 4–6 to TRL 8–9

Share of Russian materials and components

Cost of life cycle

safety and reliability

Economic Impact on the Territory

Environmental efficiency

export potential

First decision

Create an interdepartmental working group and a pilot's directorate.

For 12 months to prepare a feasibility study, choose a landfill and 3–5 demonstrators.

Form a register of 20–30 critical materials and technologies.

Adopt a regulatory and investment roadmap.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Science_Departmental_Note.docx · Web Text +

MINOBRNAUKI RUSSIA

Departmental position note

1. Subject of the initiative

Creation of a scientific and technological platform for new generation transport systems and materials with specified properties.

2. Systemic issues

  • Dissociation of scientific schools and industry customers
  • Lack of large-scale testing programs
  • long cycle of transfer of the results of fundamental research to industry

3. Proposed role of the agency

  • Coordination of R&D and research centers
  • formation of megascience programs and applied research on transport materials
  • Training of personnel and interdisciplinary engineering teams

4. Set of priority measures

  • Scientific program "Physics and materials of high-speed transport"
  • Competence centers for magnetic levitation, aerodynamics of rarefied media, composites and digital twins
  • a Unified Experimental Data Bank
  • Targeted Masters and Engineering Schools

5. Pilot project

Research and development consortium of universities, research institutes and industry with an open program of verification of key technologies.

6. Key indicators

  • level of technological readiness TRL
  • Number of protected and implemented technologies
  • personnel issue
  • patents and licenses
  • Percentage of studies that reached the industrial pilot

7. Interagency interfaces

The departmental program is implemented not in isolation, but through a single inter-industry contour "EQUILIBRIUM", connecting transport, industry, science, digital infrastructure, energy, construction, economy and environmental monitoring.

8. Actions to be taken

  • to determine the profile responsible for the participation of the department in the intersectoral working group
  • create a list of industry technologies and high-readiness projects
  • select pilot object/corridor/polygon for testing
  • to prepare proposals on regulatory, financial and organizational mechanisms
  • Include pilot results in federal program scaling plan

9. Final formula

EQUILIBRIUM = the State Order + Science + materials + Industry + Infrastructure + Data + energy + Operation + measurable effect.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS OF MINIBRASCI OF RUSSIA EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Science_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

Strategic objective

Creation of a scientific and technological platform for new generation transport systems and materials with specified properties.

Systemic issues

Dissociation of scientific schools and industry customers

Lack of large-scale testing programs

long cycle of transfer of the results of fundamental research to industry

Role of the Department

Coordination of R&D and research centers

formation of megascience programs and applied research on transport materials

Training of personnel and interdisciplinary engineering teams

Priority measures

Scientific program "Physics and materials of high-speed transport"

Competence centers for magnetic levitation, aerodynamics of rarefied media, composites and digital twins

a Unified Experimental Data Bank

Targeted Masters and Engineering Schools

Pilot

Research and development consortium of universities, research institutes and industry with an open program of verification of key technologies.

KPI and launch solution

level of technological readiness TRL

Number of protected and implemented technologies

personnel issue

patents and licenses

Percentage of studies that reached the industrial pilot

Inclusion of the department in the intersectoral federal contour "EQUILIBRIUM".

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Nature_Departmental_Note.docx · Web Text +

MINPRIRODS OF RUSSIA

Departmental position note

1. Subject of the initiative

Ensuring environmental acceptability and eco-friendly design of new transport corridors.

2. Systemic issues

  • Habitat fragmentation and the impact of linear infrastructure
  • noise, vibration, power consumption and material footprint
  • The need to evaluate the life cycle of new technologies

3. Proposed role of the agency

  • environmental criteria for placement and operation
  • Methods for monitoring biocenoses along corridors
  • Material and Infrastructure Life Cycle Assessment

4. Set of priority measures

  • Ecological Digital Double Corridor
  • Biocenous monitoring points
  • Eco-products and solutions for preserving migration routes
  • LCA-Evaluation of materials, energy and construction

5. Pilot project

Ecological contour of the pilot corridor with continuous monitoring of air, water, soil, noise, vibrations and biodiversity.

6. Key indicators

  • Measurable effects on biocenoses
  • Carbon and material life cycle trace
  • Proportion of compensated impacts
  • energy efficiency
  • completeness of environmental monitoring

7. Interagency interfaces

The departmental program is implemented not in isolation, but through a single inter-industry contour "EQUILIBRIUM", connecting transport, industry, science, digital infrastructure, energy, construction, economy and environmental monitoring.

8. Actions to be taken

  • to determine the profile responsible for the participation of the department in the intersectoral working group
  • create a list of industry technologies and high-readiness projects
  • select pilot object/corridor/polygon for testing
  • to prepare proposals on regulatory, financial and organizational mechanisms
  • Include pilot results in federal program scaling plan

9. Final formula

EQUILIBRIUM = the State Order + Science + materials + Industry + Infrastructure + Data + energy + Operation + measurable effect.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS OF THE MINPRIROD OF RUSSIA EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Nature_presentation.pptx · web text +

Strategic objective

Ensuring environmental acceptability and eco-friendly design of new transport corridors.

Systemic issues

Habitat fragmentation and the impact of linear infrastructure

noise, vibration, power consumption and material footprint

The need to evaluate the life cycle of new technologies

Role of the Department

environmental criteria for placement and operation

Methods for monitoring biocenoses along corridors

Material and Infrastructure Life Cycle Assessment

Priority measures

Ecological Digital Double Corridor

Biocenous monitoring points

Eco-products and solutions for preserving migration routes

LCA-Evaluation of materials, energy and construction

Pilot

Ecological contour of the pilot corridor with continuous monitoring of air, water, soil, noise, vibrations and biodiversity.

KPI and launch solution

Measurable effects on biocenoses

Carbon and material life cycle trace

Proportion of compensated impacts

energy efficiency

completeness of environmental monitoring

Inclusion of the department in the intersectoral federal contour "EQUILIBRIUM".

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Industry_Departmental_Note.docx · Web Text +

MINPROMTORG RUSSIA

Departmental position note

1. Subject of the initiative

Creation of domestic industrial base for high-speed transport and new transport materials science.

2. Systemic issues

  • Dependence of critical components on foreign supplies
  • gap between R&D, prototype and serial production
  • the need for new production of composites, power electronics, magnetic systems and high-purity materials

3. Proposed role of the agency

  • formation of industrial cooperation and localization
  • support of pilot industrial production
  • coordination of manufacturers of materials, components, transport engineering and equipment

4. Set of priority measures

  • Register of critical transport materials and components
  • Consortiums for composites, aluminum, ceramics, magnetic systems and power electronics
  • mechanisms of SPIC, off-take contracts and long-term order
  • serial testing of modular components of high-speed transport

5. Pilot project

Industrial cluster of components for maglev, HCM and Hyperloop-type systems with a complete chain from material to certified node.

6. Key indicators

  • Percentage of localization
  • Number of serially mastered components
  • Cost reduction
  • export potential
  • Transition time R&D → series

7. Interagency interfaces

The departmental program is implemented not in isolation, but through a single inter-industry contour "EQUILIBRIUM", connecting transport, industry, science, digital infrastructure, energy, construction, economy and environmental monitoring.

8. Actions to be taken

  • to determine the profile responsible for the participation of the department in the intersectoral working group
  • create a list of industry technologies and high-readiness projects
  • select pilot object/corridor/polygon for testing
  • to prepare proposals on regulatory, financial and organizational mechanisms
  • Include pilot results in federal program scaling plan

9. Final formula

EQUILIBRIUM = the State Order + Science + materials + Industry + Infrastructure + Data + energy + Operation + measurable effect.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS OF THE MINISTER OF RUSSIA EQUILIBRIUM_Minpromtorg_presentation.pptx · web text +

Strategic objective

Creation of domestic industrial base for high-speed transport and new transport materials science.

Systemic issues

Dependence of critical components on foreign supplies

gap between R&D, prototype and serial production

the need for new production of composites, power electronics, magnetic systems and high-purity materials

Role of the Department

formation of industrial cooperation and localization

support of pilot industrial production

coordination of manufacturers of materials, components, transport engineering and equipment

Priority measures

Register of critical transport materials and components

Consortiums for composites, aluminum, ceramics, magnetic systems and power electronics

mechanisms of SPIC, off-take contracts and long-term order

serial testing of modular components of high-speed transport

Pilot

Industrial cluster of components for maglev, HCM and Hyperloop-type systems with a complete chain from material to certified node.

KPI and launch solution

Percentage of localization

Number of serially mastered components

Cost reduction

export potential

Transition time R&D → series

Inclusion of the department in the intersectoral federal contour "EQUILIBRIUM".

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS EQUILIBRIUM_Minstroy_Department_Note.docx · Web Text +

MINSTRA RUSSIA

Departmental position note

1. Subject of the initiative

Creation of a new construction and engineering base for linear high-speed transport infrastructure.

2. Systemic issues

  • high cost of ground floor, overpasses, tunnels and station complexes
  • the need for accelerated construction in difficult soils and climatic conditions
  • Insufficient use of new materials and industrial methods

3. Proposed role of the agency

  • Construction standards and standard solutions
  • Implementation of industrial modular construction
  • coordination of technologies for stabilization of soils and new structural materials

4. Set of priority measures

  • typical design modules of overpasses and tracks
  • Ground Stabilization Programme for Transport Corridors
  • BIM/TIM + Digital Passport Infrastructure
  • Accelerated testing of new materials in construction

5. Pilot project

High-speed corridor infrastructure using stabilized bases, modular structures and digital deformation control.

6. Key indicators

  • Cost of km of infrastructure
  • construction period
  • Resource Design
  • Reuse of Materials
  • Percentage of industrially manufactured elements

7. Interagency interfaces

The departmental program is implemented not in isolation, but through a single inter-industry contour "EQUILIBRIUM", connecting transport, industry, science, digital infrastructure, energy, construction, economy and environmental monitoring.

8. Actions to be taken

  • to determine the profile responsible for the participation of the department in the intersectoral working group
  • create a list of industry technologies and high-readiness projects
  • select pilot object/corridor/polygon for testing
  • to prepare proposals on regulatory, financial and organizational mechanisms
  • Include pilot results in federal program scaling plan

9. Final formula

EQUILIBRIUM = the State Order + Science + materials + Industry + Infrastructure + Data + energy + Operation + measurable effect.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS OF RUSSIAN MINISTERIAL EQUILIBRIUM_Minstroy_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

Strategic objective

Creation of a new construction and engineering base for linear high-speed transport infrastructure.

Systemic issues

high cost of ground floor, overpasses, tunnels and station complexes

the need for accelerated construction in difficult soils and climatic conditions

Insufficient use of new materials and industrial methods

Role of the Department

Construction standards and standard solutions

Implementation of industrial modular construction

coordination of technologies for stabilization of soils and new structural materials

Priority measures

typical design modules of overpasses and tracks

Ground Stabilization Programme for Transport Corridors

BIM/TIM + Digital Passport Infrastructure

Accelerated testing of new materials in construction

Pilot

High-speed corridor infrastructure using stabilized bases, modular structures and digital deformation control.

KPI and launch solution

Cost of km of infrastructure

construction period

Resource Design

Reuse of Materials

Percentage of industrially manufactured elements

Inclusion of the department in the intersectoral federal contour "EQUILIBRIUM".

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS EQUILIBRIUM_Mintrans_agency_note.docx · web text +

MINTRANS RUSSIA

Departmental position note

1. Subject of the initiative

Formation of a national system of high-speed and ultra-high-speed transport, integrated with the existing transport network.

2. Systemic issues

  • Incoherence of certain transport modes and infrastructure projects
  • The need to move from individual facilities to corridor management
  • shortage of uniform requirements for pilots of maglev, vacuum-tube and automated transport

3. Proposed role of the agency

  • State customer of transport architecture and pilot corridors
  • coordination of the regulatory model and integration with rail, road, aviation and port infrastructure
  • formation of requirements for security, capacity and interoperability

4. Set of priority measures

  • Federal program "High-speed transport corridors of Russia"
  • Federal Test Site for Muggle and Hyperloop-type Systems
  • digital passport corridor and life cycle management
  • pilot bundle HCM + Maglev + Automated Cargo Logistics

5. Pilot project

Pilot corridor of federal significance with phased verification of HSR, maglev and vacuum-tube technologies at independent test sites.

6. Key indicators

  • Reduced travel time
  • Corridor capacity
  • Cost of life cycle
  • level of technology localization
  • Security and readiness for scaling

7. Interagency interfaces

The departmental program is implemented not in isolation, but through a single inter-industry contour "EQUILIBRIUM", connecting transport, industry, science, digital infrastructure, energy, construction, economy and environmental monitoring.

8. Actions to be taken

  • to determine the profile responsible for the participation of the department in the intersectoral working group
  • create a list of industry technologies and high-readiness projects
  • select pilot object/corridor/polygon for testing
  • to prepare proposals on regulatory, financial and organizational mechanisms
  • Include pilot results in federal program scaling plan

9. Final formula

EQUILIBRIUM = the State Order + Science + materials + Industry + Infrastructure + Data + energy + Operation + measurable effect.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS OF THE RUSSIAN MINTRANS EQUILIBRIUM_Mintrans_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

Strategic objective

Formation of a national system of high-speed and ultra-high-speed transport, integrated with the existing transport network.

Systemic issues

Incoherence of certain transport modes and infrastructure projects

The need to move from individual facilities to corridor management

shortage of uniform requirements for pilots of maglev, vacuum-tube and automated transport

Role of the Department

State customer of transport architecture and pilot corridors

coordination of the regulatory model and integration with rail, road, aviation and port infrastructure

formation of requirements for security, capacity and interoperability

Priority measures

Federal program "High-speed transport corridors of Russia"

Federal Test Site for Muggle and Hyperloop-type Systems

digital passport corridor and life cycle management

pilot bundle HCM + Maglev + Automated Cargo Logistics

Pilot

Pilot corridor of federal significance with phased verification of HSR, maglev and vacuum-tube technologies at independent test sites.

KPI and launch solution

Reduced travel time

Corridor capacity

Cost of life cycle

level of technology localization

Security and readiness for scaling

Inclusion of the department in the intersectoral federal contour "EQUILIBRIUM".

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS EQUILIBRIUM_Minics_agency_note.docx · web text +

RUSSIAN MINCIFIES

Departmental position note

1. Subject of the initiative

Creation of a single digital control circuit for high-speed transport infrastructure and life cycle data.

2. Systemic issues

  • incompatible information systems of industries
  • Fragmentary Telemetry Collection
  • The need for a trusted digital infrastructure for autonomous transport systems

3. Proposed role of the agency

  • architecture of interagency data exchange
  • requirements for digital platform, cyber-resilience and identification
  • development of domestic software, AI and digital twins

4. Set of priority measures

  • Platform "EQUILIBRIUM Speed"
  • unified API and transport data model
  • Digital twins of corridors and infrastructure
  • AI-failure prediction and flow control

5. Pilot project

Digital twin pilot high-speed corridor with telemetry, predictive maintenance and interagency situational center.

6. Key indicators

  • Share of connected objects
  • Accuracy of failure forecasts
  • reduced response time
  • availability of services
  • share of domestic software

7. Interagency interfaces

The departmental program is implemented not in isolation, but through a single inter-industry contour "EQUILIBRIUM", connecting transport, industry, science, digital infrastructure, energy, construction, economy and environmental monitoring.

8. Actions to be taken

  • to determine the profile responsible for the participation of the department in the intersectoral working group
  • create a list of industry technologies and high-readiness projects
  • select pilot object/corridor/polygon for testing
  • to prepare proposals on regulatory, financial and organizational mechanisms
  • Include pilot results in federal program scaling plan

9. Final formula

EQUILIBRIUM = the State Order + Science + materials + Industry + Infrastructure + Data + energy + Operation + measurable effect.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS OF RUSSIAN MINCIFIES EQUILIBRIUM_Minics_presentation.pptx · web text +

Strategic objective

Creation of a single digital control circuit for high-speed transport infrastructure and life cycle data.

Systemic issues

incompatible information systems of industries

Fragmentary Telemetry Collection

The need for a trusted digital infrastructure for autonomous transport systems

Role of the Department

architecture of interagency data exchange

requirements for digital platform, cyber-resilience and identification

development of domestic software, AI and digital twins

Priority measures

Platform "EQUILIBRIUM Speed"

unified API and transport data model

Digital twins of corridors and infrastructure

AI-failure prediction and flow control

Pilot

Digital twin pilot high-speed corridor with telemetry, predictive maintenance and interagency situational center.

KPI and launch solution

Share of connected objects

Accuracy of failure forecasts

reduced response time

availability of services

share of domestic software

Inclusion of the department in the intersectoral federal contour "EQUILIBRIUM".

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Economic Development_Departmental_Note.docx · Web Text +

THE MINISTERIAL DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIA

Departmental position note

1. Subject of the initiative

Formation of an economic, investment and regulatory model for new high-speed transport systems.

2. Systemic issues

  • high capital intensity of projects
  • Uncertainty of demand and payback of new technologies
  • Lack of a unified assessment of cross-industry effects

3. Proposed role of the agency

  • PPP and project finance model
  • Assessment of socio-economic effects
  • Regulatory experiments and special regimes

4. Set of priority measures

  • unified method of calculation of the full effect: time + logistics + agglomeration effects + industrial localization
  • Pilot Training Fund/Mechanism
  • regulatory sandbox for new modes of transport
  • portfolio of concessional and PPP models

5. Pilot project

Feasibility study of multi-technology corridor and independent assessment of demand and life cycle cost scenarios.

6. Key indicators

  • NPV/IRR under different scenarios
  • private investment in the ruble budget investments
  • Reduced travel time
  • Growth of business activity of the territories
  • Budget and multiplier effect

7. Interagency interfaces

The departmental program is implemented not in isolation, but through a single inter-industry contour "EQUILIBRIUM", connecting transport, industry, science, digital infrastructure, energy, construction, economy and environmental monitoring.

8. Actions to be taken

  • to determine the profile responsible for the participation of the department in the intersectoral working group
  • create a list of industry technologies and high-readiness projects
  • select pilot object/corridor/polygon for testing
  • to prepare proposals on regulatory, financial and organizational mechanisms
  • Include pilot results in federal program scaling plan

9. Final formula

EQUILIBRIUM = the State Order + Science + materials + Industry + Infrastructure + Data + energy + Operation + measurable effect.

Other published editorial board: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS MINICONOMY OF RUSSIA EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Economic Development_presentation.pptx · web text +

Strategic objective

Formation of an economic, investment and regulatory model for new high-speed transport systems.

Systemic issues

high capital intensity of projects

Uncertainty of demand and payback of new technologies

Lack of a unified assessment of cross-industry effects

Role of the Department

PPP and project finance model

Assessment of socio-economic effects

Regulatory experiments and special regimes

Priority measures

unified method of calculation of the full effect: time + logistics + agglomeration effects + industrial localization

Pilot Training Fund/Mechanism

regulatory sandbox for new modes of transport

portfolio of concessional and PPP models

Pilot

Feasibility study of multi-technology corridor and independent assessment of demand and life cycle cost scenarios.

KPI and launch solution

NPV/IRR under different scenarios

private investment in the ruble budget investments

Reduced travel time

Growth of business activity of the territories

Budget and multiplier effect

Inclusion of the department in the intersectoral federal contour "EQUILIBRIUM".

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS EQUILIBRIUM_Ministry of Energy_Departmental_Note.docx · Web Text +

MININERGO RUSSIA

Departmental position note

1. Subject of the initiative

Providing high-speed transport systems with sustainable, distributed and managed energy infrastructure.

2. Systemic issues

  • increased capacity of transport loads
  • The need for energy storage and storage
  • Inequality of consumption along transport corridors

3. Proposed role of the agency

  • balancing the energy supply of new transport corridors
  • development of drives, substations and local generation
  • Formation of energy efficiency requirements

4. Set of priority measures

  • Energy passport of the high-speed corridor
  • Storage and Hybrid Power Systems
  • recovery and peak load management
  • Integration with distributed and low-carbon generation

5. Pilot project

Energy microgrid test site with accumulation, redundancy and digital load management.

6. Key indicators

  • kW·h per passenger- or tonne-kilometre
  • Percentage of recovery
  • reliability of energy supply
  • peak power and its smoothing
  • Proportion of domestic equipment

7. Interagency interfaces

The departmental program is implemented not in isolation, but through a single inter-industry contour "EQUILIBRIUM", connecting transport, industry, science, digital infrastructure, energy, construction, economy and environmental monitoring.

8. Actions to be taken

  • to determine the profile responsible for the participation of the department in the intersectoral working group
  • create a list of industry technologies and high-readiness projects
  • select pilot object/corridor/polygon for testing
  • to prepare proposals on regulatory, financial and organizational mechanisms
  • Include pilot results in federal program scaling plan

9. Final formula

EQUILIBRIUM = the State Order + Science + materials + Industry + Infrastructure + Data + energy + Operation + measurable effect.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM SPEED SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS MINISTERS OF RUSSIA EQUILIBRIUM_Minenergo_presentation.pptx · web text +

Strategic objective

Providing high-speed transport systems with sustainable, distributed and managed energy infrastructure.

Systemic issues

increased capacity of transport loads

The need for energy storage and storage

Inequality of consumption along transport corridors

Role of the Department

balancing the energy supply of new transport corridors

development of drives, substations and local generation

Formation of energy efficiency requirements

Priority measures

Energy passport of the high-speed corridor

Storage and Hybrid Power Systems

recovery and peak load management

Integration with distributed and low-carbon generation

Pilot

Energy microgrid test site with accumulation, redundancy and digital load management.

KPI and launch solution

kW·h per passenger- or tonne-kilometre

Percentage of recovery

reliability of energy supply

peak power and its smoothing

Proportion of domestic equipment

Inclusion of the department in the intersectoral federal contour "EQUILIBRIUM".

Published files

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Science and methodology

Methodological resources and models of systems, validation, scientific infrastructure and research. The authors’ propositions are reproduced with the status of their original publications, together with available limitations and explanations.

Materials: 22 · with full text: 22 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Science · Full published text

Quantum Leap: Densities and Measurements

Source Status: Primary Document

A supplementary edition of the White Paper of Destiny on a traceable system of measurements, evidence and decisions, distinguishing quantum interpretations from figurative ones.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/kvantovyi-ryvok-plotnosti-i-izmereniy

Open on the site

Scientific and metrological concept • Project Edition 1.0 • 30 August 2026

RELEASE ID BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M01

SUPPLEMENT BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-KRPI-2026-01

STATUS / Passport of issue and reading rules

FieldValue
Master IDBKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M01
Add-on PackageBKS-REVIVAL-SUP-KRPI-2026-01
StatusCandidate - a project for scientific, metrological and ethical expertise
Basic RegistryBKS-0001…BKS-0344; base_count = 344; composition and numbering are unchanged
SubjectDensity, Dimension, Measurement, Uncertainty, Quantum Resources, and Proof Outline
Project modulesMeaningful framework and rights; Keys/Gate; Validation map; BIOC; dynamic biosphere; forecast; adaptive planning
BorderDoes not claim discovery of new physical dimensions, miraculous properties of matter or guaranteed technological superiority

The document supplements the body of the “White Paper of Destiny” as a separate issue. It is not assigned the next number, BKS-0345, and does not change the checksum of the base register until the editorial board makes a separate decision, the manifest is checked and a new version is recorded.

  • Scientific definitions and units are based on BIPM/JCGM, NIST and the operating SI system.
  • Project indicators are only acceptable with an explicit numerator, denominator, unit, method and limit of applicability.
  • The symbolic categories of the 16 KON Principles provide a framework for responsibility; they do not replace physical laws.

Summary: What is considered a quantum leap

The word "quantum" here has a narrow physical meaning: the sensor uses a quantum state, coherence, interference, entanglement, discrete quantum count, or quantum-optical reference. It does not mean a “jump of consciousness”, a transition to a parallel world or an arbitrary increase in the number of spatial dimensions.

The program begins not with the choice of spectacular technology, but with a passport of a measurable value: what exactly is measured, in what units, under what conditions, by what method and with what uncertainty. Quantum and classical paths are then compared on one measurable object and on one uncertainty budget.

Five conditions for a verified jerk

  1. The measured value and boundary of the object are fixed before the experiment.
  2. The improvement of the relatively classical base is statistically and metrologically significant.
  3. The chain to the recognized benchmark is documented; uncertainty is not hidden within the algorithm.
  4. The result is reproduced by an independent group or confirmed by interlaboratory comparison.
  5. The practical value exceeds the cost, risk and externalities of the life cycle.

Vocabulary / Terms without confusion

Table 1 - Six key terms and their permissible interpretations

TermStrict valueInvalid substitution
SizeProperty to which value and unit are assignedAny number without object and method
Dimension of magnitudeDependence on base quantities as a product of powers; for example, [ρ] = M·L⁻³Number of model coordinates or "level of being"
MeasurementExperimental process of obtaining values reasonably attributed to the valueObservation without calibration and conditions
UncertaintyNon-negative parameter describing the spread of values based on the information usedDevice error as one unknown number
TraceabilityDocumented continuous chain calibrations to the support, each with contribution to uncertaintyLink to a brand or certificate without chain
Coordinate ModelIndependent feature, state or parameter of the engineering modelAdditional physical space

In this issue, the words "layer", "sphere", "contour" and "model dimension" are used as architectural terms. When it comes to physical dimension, this is clearly indicated by the designation [Q] and the SI unit.

Two Spiritual and Philosophical Traditions, Separate from Metrology

E0 / E1 · BORDER / Cosmoritmology and Archeometer

The word “rhythm” without clocks, timelines, period allocation methods, and uncertainty estimation remains a metaphor. Seasonality, trend, omissions and multiple search periods are recorded in advance; the match found is checked at a delayed interval and against alternative models.

Archeometer: historical and cultural layer

Safely extracted principles

  • Separate layers: symbol, text, number, color, sound and observed value are not identical.
  • Typize the relationship: citation, analogy, hypothesis, exact is forbidden to assign by similarity of form.
  • Store provenance, language, page, editorial, translation, and version of each link.
  • Do not make a physical or causal inference without a separate measurable validation test and map.

Metaphora / E0 / Cybalion: Seven Principles as Semantic Heuristics

Crosswalk without science

  • Mentalism → model is not equal to the object; distinguish between representation, observation and reality.
  • Correspondence → interscale analogy becomes a hypothesis only with mechanism and test.
  • Vibration → needs frequency, amplitude, spectrum, unit, window, and U; otherwise it is a metaphor.
  • Polarity → axis, poles and zero are explicitly defined; the principle cannot be applied to ranking people.
  • Rhythm → time series, period, phase, seasonality and backtest on invisible data.
  • Cause & Effect → causal design, time order, alternative control and intervention.
  • Gender → historical source symbolism, not biological or social classification.

In the registry, each link receives a type of tradition/metaphor/hypothesis, source, page, version of interpretation, and prohibition of automatic E boost. Technical solutions continue to rely on SI, SOP, U, traceability and independent verification.

LAWS AND MANAGEMENT / The person in the center is the subject, not the object of the index

Mandatory Guarantees

  • Clear legitimate purpose; free will and informed consent where it is the basis.
  • Minimization of data, limitation of purpose and term; prohibition of secondary use "just in case".
  • A clear explanation of the data, logic, uncertainty and consequences of a particular decision.
  • The right to correct data, challenge the conclusion, contact the person and get a manual cancellation.
  • Accessibility for different abilities and languages; checking for systematic barriers and biases.
  • Fair distribution of benefits, costs and risks; participation of affected communities.
  • The name of the owner of the decision, the action log and independent verification; the right to stop in person.

METAFORE E0 / MODEL E1 / Galactic Keys and Gates

The key links value and context to the object, place, time, evidence, and solution. He addresses the record, but does not confirm it and does not give authority to act.

The Eight Keys

  • Meaning - why; Rhythm - when; scale - where the boundary is; Relationships - with what is compared.
  • Measure - what is measured; Proof - what is confirmed; Responsibility - who decides; Memory is what is preserved.

Gate G0-G8

G0 meaning → G1 Law → G2 measurand → G3 Protocol → G4 Data/QA/U → G5 E-gate → G6 independent verification → G7 human decision → G8 Archives and supervision. Any step is acceptable PASS, REWORK or STOP; no mandatory field closes the gate.

  • ORION VAL/OBJ/GEO/TIM/E/DEC; Validation card — Claim ID and gate; registry — version, provenance and history STOP.
  • The key does not sign the solution, does not raise the E, and does not replace the owner, verifier, or consent.

SCIENCE/Mass Density: The Standard of Strict Definition

Mass density links the mass of the sample m and its volume V. The simple formula does not make the measurement simple: the object must be uniform or have a certain averaging area; temperature, pressure, humidity, porosity, and phase state can change volume and result.

The density result cannot be published as a single number. The minimum record includes an estimate of ρ, an extended uncertainty of U, an coverage factor or confidence procedure, a unit, conditions, a method for determining m and V, measurement identifiers, and a relationship to calibrations.

Table 2 - Example of a project passport for density measurement

FieldExample of recording
Measured valueAverage sample mass density in a given geometric region
Modelρ = m/V; air, temperature and geometry corrections are specified by the method
TermsTemperature and pressure are recorded; sample condition is recorded
Resultρ = y ± U kg/m³; k and the coverage level are given separately
TraceabilityMass and length/volume are linked to the reference through documented calibrations
  • Number density, charge density and optical density are other quantities; they cannot be combined by a single factor.
  • For a heterogeneous medium, local ρ(r,t) and average density by volume answer different questions.

DEFINITION / Energy and Information Density

Physical Energy Values

The energy density u and the specific energy e have different denominators and apply to different solutions. Energy and materials additionally record the type of energy, system boundary, integration time, loss, charge/discharge mode and safety.

Project Information Metrics

"Information density" is not one universal SI value. In computing and measurement systems, this is a family of indicators that are only acceptable after an operational definition.

Table 3 - Permissible design metrics

MetricsUnitWhat needs to be fixed
Storage Densitybit/m³ or byte/m³Physical volume, usable capacity, coding, redundancy
Data flow densitybit/(s·m²) or bit/s per channelInterface boundary, band, loss and delay
Density of valid observationsObservations/(m³·s)Validity criterion, window, area, gaps
Density of evidenceVerified Object-Event RecordsPassport composition, uniqueness, version and independence

MODEL / Measuring chain: from object to solution

The measured value (measurand) must be determined before the sensor. The measurement model relates input values Xᵢ, corrections and conditions to output value Y.

End-to-end process

  1. Define object, boundary, magnitude, dimension, unit, and conditions.
  2. Record the method, software version and hardware configuration.
  3. Get primary readings along with time, place, and state of the environment.
  4. Apply calibrations, corrections, and conversion model; save raw data.
  5. Evaluate uncertainty and covariance; perform sensitivity checks.
  6. Verify the quality, integrity, traceability and independence of the confirmation.
  7. Transfer to the solution is not a number, but a certified result and an acceptable scope.

The machine learning algorithm can participate in f(·), but does not exempt from metrology. The model version, learning sampling, drift, stability outside the learning range, and the algorithm's contribution to uncertainty become part of the passport.

METROLOGY / Uncertainty: The Fair Frontier of Knowledge

Uncertainty does not mean “bad measurement.” It makes the limits of the statement visible and allows comparison of methods. The budget includes statistical components and components assessed by calibrations, specifications, models, reference materials and expertly based information.

If the mass and volume depend on the overall temperature, the overall geometric model, or one preparation procedure, the covariance members cannot be automatically zeroed. For nonlinear models and asymmetric distributions, numerical distribution methods and sensitivity analysis are used.

Minimum budget

  • repeatability and reproducibility; resolution and drift of the measuring instrument;
  • calibration, reference and interpolation; effects of temperature, pressure, humidity and vibration;
  • Sampling, heterogeneity and object geometry; model, software and rounding;
  • data loss, window selection, filtering and observation exclusion criteria.

QUALITY / Traceability, comparability and trust

Metrological traceability links the result to a recognized support through a documented continuous chain of calibrations, each of which contributes to uncertainty. This is a property of the result, not the instrument itself.

Chain of Trust

  1. Definition of the SI unit through fixed constants and implementing primary standards.
  2. National or other recognized reference; results of comparisons and declared calibration capabilities.
  3. Accredited calibration with method, conditions and uncertainty.
  4. Working measurement tool, drift control, intermediate checks and maintenance log.
  5. Passport of the result with proofs, version of calculations and decision on suitability.

Table 4 - Four different quality mechanisms

MechanismWhich confirmsWhich in itself does not confirm
ISO/IEC 17025Competence of the laboratory and consistency of processesThe truth of any individual result outside the field
ILAC P10Policy of traceability of results in accreditationAutomatic recognition of project methodology
CIPM MRAInternational comparability of standards and capabilities of NMIsProduct Certification
Interlaboratory comparisonComparability of specific methodology and rangeUniversality beyond the tested conditions

TECHNOLOGY / Where Quantum Resource Really Helps

Quantum metrology uses controlled quantum states to estimate parameters. The potential gain arises in a particular architecture: a narrower spectral line, phase interference sensitivity, correlated collective response, photon count, or frequency relationship with an atomic transition.

Table 5 Resource, Measured Value and Limitation

The Quantum ResourceExample of sizeVerified winningsPractical Limit
Atomic Transitionfrequency/timeStability and accuracy of the watchsystematic shifts, comparison and transmission
Interferencephase, acceleration, fieldSensitivity to small shiftcontrast, vibration, dead time
Spin-compression/entanglementthe Collective Back Phasenoise below the standard quantum limitdecoherence, loss, reading
Quantity Accountoptical flux/spectrumLow detection limitDark events, effectiveness and background

Publications NIST demonstrate quantum-enhanced measurement in controlled installations. For example, in an experiment with a large crystal of ions stated 8,8 ± 0,4 dB below the standard quantum limit and sensitivity to the electric field 240 ± 10 nV/m/√Hz. This is a strong laboratory result, but not a promise of the same performance in any field instrument.

  • Compare should be the full result of the same measurand, not just the internal noise sensor.
  • Ideal scaling limits are not transferred to operation without taking into account losses, preparation time and reading.
  • The classical path remains mandatory as a control, reserve and means of detecting drift.

VERIFICATION / Levels of Evidence E0-E4

Table 6 - Staircase from image to operational result

LevelStatusWhat is allowed to approveWhat is required next
E0Symbol / MetaphorThe image helps to ask the questionDo not pass for a description of nature
E1Hypothesis / ModelThere is a definition, a mechanism and a rebuttable forecastProtocol and baseline
E2Laboratory surveillanceEffect obtained under the stated conditionsRepeatability, full budget
E3Independent confirmationThere is reproduction or interlaboratory comparabilityField Pilot and Life Cycle Assessment
E4Validated resultThe method is suitable in the declared field of operationSupervision, drift control and revision

The “Snap Confirmed”

  1. The comparison base and the success criterion are published before the analysis of the results.
  2. The total extended uncertainty or detection limit is improved within a given range.
  3. Traceability, data integrity and reproducibility are not impaired.
  4. The independent review has reached pre-agreed criteria.
  5. The decision passed an assessment of safety, rights, environmental impact and cost of ownership.

PROJECT STANDARD / Single passport of measurement

Passport is the minimum unit of exchange between the laboratory, the computing GRID, the management system and the Heritage Archive. The field can only be empty with an obvious reason; critical fields block publication.

Table 7 - Mandatory passport fields

BlockRequired fields
Identitymeasurement_uid; release_id; object_uid; event_uid; status
Measured valuemeasurand; definition; quantity_kind; dimension; unit
Object and boundaryobject_type; spatial_boundary; averaging_domain; sample_rule
Time and Conditionsvalid_time; system_time; temperature; pressure; environment
Methodmethod_id@version; measurement_model; correction_model; software_hash
Equipmentinstrument_uid; configuration; calibration_ids; maintenance_state
Primary datadataset_uid; format; checksum; completeness; exclusion_log
Resultvalue; expanded_uncertainty; coverage; detection_limit; quality_flags
Uncertaintybudget_uid; components; distributions; covariance; sensitivity
Traceabilityreference; unbroken_chain; calibration_uncertainties; validity
Evidenceevidence_level E0–E4; verifier; intercomparison; review_status
Decisionfitness_for_use; range; prohibited_uses; decision_uid; approver
Rights and Ethicsowner; access_class; purpose_limit; retention; consent/ethics
Origincreator; agent; transformations; timestamps; signature; archive_uid

CROSSWALK / Embedding in the White Book and model 741

The issue is a related body object, not a rewrite of an existing ontology. A single experimental record may have multiple connections, but each link indicates the type, version, area, and proof.

Table 8 — Priority addresses BAL-741

CodeSolution OutlineRole in the issue
BAL:C05:B10:S1Science and technology × innovation-reliability × object/pilotBasic cell of the scientific pilot
BAL:C13:B11:S2Data and AI × Digital efficiency and sovereignty × industry/countryData Federation and Rights
BAL:C19:B06:S3Long horizon × present-future × international levelComparability and inheritance
BAL:C09:B04:S1Water × nature-technosphere × object/territoryWater-Soil Pilot
BAL:C10:B04:S1Ecology × nature-technosphere × object/territoryBiocenosis and a full-cycle farm

FIELD‑741 and ORION22:22

  • FIELD:S05:N05:D - signal diagnostics; FIELD:S05:N14:K - coordination of standard and data.
  • FIELD:S09:N17:R - Development of technology; FIELD:S13:N10:D - Diagnosis of risk; FIELD:S08:N19:R - verified result.
  • ORION: OBJ/GEO/TIM specify the object, territory and time; IND — indicator; RSK — Risk; PRV — origin; REC/RGT — Archive and rights.
  • The 16 KON Principles are used as an ethical and systemic framework: K08 causality, K12 resources without applying a physical law to social processes, K16 a safe transition.

MODEL / E1 / Validation card

Table 9 - Approval route from registration to decision

ZvenoWhat is fixedBlocking issue
Claim IDUnique ID, version, wording and scopeIs the claim clear and rebuttable?
MeasurandSize, object, boundary, unit and conditionsWhat exactly can be measured?
Method / SOPMethodology, version, sampling, calculationCan the procedure be repeated?
Reference / calibrationSupport, chain, range and durationIs there traceability?
Data / provenanceDataset UID, author, time, conversions, checksumCan the origin be restored?
U / QABudget uncertainty, flags, controls, exceptionsIs the result suitable for the solution?
E0–E4Current evidence level and basis of assignmentStatus confirmed by data?
G0–G4Gateway, PASS / REWORK / STOP and conditionsIs the next stage allowed?
ResponsibilityOwner, reviewer, date of reviewWho and when is responsible for the review?

Table 10 — Lock matrix G0-G4 and evidence E0-E4

GatewayE0E1E2E3E4
G0 · registrationdescribedHypothesis———
G1 · ProtocollinkSOP + Baseto collection——
G2 ·linkVersionPASS / REWORKto verification—
G3 · IndependentarchivefrozenComparedPASS / REWORKto operation
G4 ·archivearchiveOversightOversightPASS + monitor

MODEL / E1 / Biocenose tags

Table 11 — Project code manuals BIOC

SegmentMeaningExamples of values
ENVEnvironmentWAT water; SOI soil; BIO biota; ATM atmosphere
OBJObjectRIV river; FLD site; COMM community; SPEC taxon
STATEStatus / DomainCHEM chemical; PHYS physical; ECO ecologist; FUNC function
METHODMethod and VersionNO3-LAB; BD-CORE; OCC-OBS; RS-IMG
SCALEGeoscaleS0 point; S1 plot; S2 swimming pool; S3 Region
TIMETime windowdate; week; season; quarter; interval
EEvidenceE0...E4 by common release ladder
GEO/TAX/PRVRelated fieldsgeometry; taxon ID; source; checksum; U

Table 12 - Three examples without loss of original passport

ContourCode BIOCWhat is necessarily near
WaterBIOC/WAT/RIV/CHEM/NO3-LAB/S1/2026-08/E2@1.0mg/L; sample; SOP; U; GEO; PRV
SoilBIOC/SOI/FLD/PHYS/BD-CORE/S1/2026-Q3/E2@1.0kg/m³; layer; humidity; U; GEO
BiotaBIOC/BIO/COMM/ECO/OCC-OBS/S1/2026-SUM/E2@1.0taxonomy; effort; date; method; U
  • The code version is immutable: the fix creates a new record and superseeds connection.
  • The georeference stores the coordinate system, accuracy, and allowable generalization of sensitive locations.
  • A result without a unit, U, and a version of the method is not allowed to be calculated; taxa have stable IDs, source, and a synonym table.

MODEL / E1 → E3 / Dynamic model of the biosphere

x describes the hidden state, u - controlled effects, ξ — External Disturbing, θ — parameters; and — BIOC-watching. Seasonality, delays, geoscale, and pool boundary are explicitly set. For the hidden state, the interval and sensitivity are published. Validation map controls gate; BAL/FIELD/ORION store address, function and provenance.

Table 13 - Conditions, Observability and Impacts

StateObserved valuesKey impacts
Waterstock, consumption, quality, temperatureclimate, fence, discharge, cleaning
Soilmoisture, density, carbon, nutrientsland use, erosion, agrotechnics
BiomassStock, Productivity, Lossesweather, harvest, grazing, recovery
Diversitywealth, composition, occurrencefragmentation, pollution, protection
Connectivityflows, corridors, barriersinfrastructure, channel, management

Four scenarios

Baseline - current mode; Pressure: Increased climate, land use or pollution. Response: Intervention. Recovery is recovery. These are conditional trajectories; the area is checked in the pool-soil-farm pilot.

  1. Calibrate θ on the advertised window and fix the data and code versions.
  2. Validate on another period or site, not just on training.
  3. Check for sensitivity, identity and pass resistance.
  4. Stop the application for drift, leaving the area or violation of the invariant.

MODEL / E1 → E3 / Monitoring and forecasting

Forecast - the distribution of possible outcomes with the given data, the scenario and the version of the model. Point number without interval, scope and baseline is not allowed to solve.

Table 14 - Horizons and forecast verification

HorizonUpdates and LoginsWithdrawalDecision
Operationalhours/days; sensors, remote sensing, alarmsnowcast + short intervalSampling, local reaction
Seasonalweeks-months; weather, phenology, balanceEnsemble and Quantilesresources, regime, reserve
Scenarioyears; climate assumptions and governanceconditional trajectoriesPortfolio comparison, not a promise

Passport of forecast

  • forecast_uid; target measure, object, horizon, unit and event threshold;
  • model_id-version, training window, baseline, inputs BIOC/SCD/laboratory and provenance;
  • distribution, median and intervals; U observations separately from the uncertainty of the forecast;
  • probability calibration, time/territory backtesting, errors and interval coverage;
  • drift flags, area, expiration date, owner and date of human review.

Oversight

  • Drift freezes automatic use until rechecked.
  • Alarm reports the probability and consequences, but does not declare the fact until confirmed by a specialist.
  • Backtesting is played on the archive version; revision does not erase past error.

MODEL / E1 → E3 / Design and planning

Adaptive solution cycle

  1. Determine the target state and environmental, legal and social invariants.
  2. Record restrictions, uncertainties, risks and exclusion zones.
  3. Form alternatives: do not act, pilot, combine or stop.
  4. Model scenarios and perform multi-criteria evaluation without a single index.
  5. Collect a portfolio of small pilots with control areas and stop-rules.
  6. Transfer options, intervals, and conflicts to the responsible person for resolution.
  7. Perform a reversible step, observe BIOC metrics and revise the plan.

Table 15 - Invariants, restrictions and stopping rules

ContourInvariant / LimitationStop-rule or return
WaterDo not degrade below a safe borderThreshold + confirmatory sample
Soilavoid irreversible loss of layer, carbon, fertilitytrend outside the model range
BiodiversityMaintain key habitats and connectivitythe Control Area Signal
People and rightssecurity, harmonization, access, non-discriminationViolation of law or procedure
  • Reversible measures and controls precede scale; irreversible automated solutions are prohibited.
  • One index does not measure success: water, soil, biota, resources, cost, rights, and sustainability are evaluated.
  • The model gives ranges; The validation map is gate; human review authorizes action and revision.

OBJECT CONTOUR / Pilot 1. Quantum magnetometry

The goal is to compare quantum and classical channels of measurement of magnetic induction B in one range, on one geometry and on a single uncertainty budget. The possible architecture is chosen after a readiness review: an atomic magnetometer, an NV center, or another quantum sensor.

Table 16 - Pilot Design Passport

ElementProject solutionAcceptance criterion
MeasurandB in tesla; range, band, orientation and volume averagingOne definition for both paths
BaseCalibrated classic magnetometer and generator/field referenceDocumented traceability
Quantum ChannelSelected sensor with independent readingFull budget, not just noise spectrum
IndignationTemperature, Vibration, Shielding, Gradient and Dead TimeRecorded synchronously with the result
ResultUncertainty curve and range detection limitE2; then external reproduction E3

Solution after 90 days

  • Choose one measurand and abandon the universal promises of a “quantum sensor for everything”.
  • Approve a blind set of tests, a classic standard and criteria for winning before the experiment.
  • Stop-rule: the pilot closes or overrides if the total uncertainty and value of the solution does not improve.

BIOCENOSIS / Pilot 2. Water, soil and full cycle farm

The goal is not to “measure the health of nature with one number,” but to build a coherent network of observations of material and energy flows. Quantum sensors are turned on only where they give a demonstrable gain; the pilot's basis is correct sampling, calibrated classical means, geo-reference and environmental interpretation.

Table 17 - Minimum set of measurements

ContourMeasured ValuesSpace/timeDecision
Waterflow rate, temperature, electrical conductivity, turbidity, selected pollutantsinput-process-output; seasonwater balance and cleaning
Soilhumidity, bulk density, pH, carbon, nutrientslayer, plot, date, selection methodregeneration and agricultural technology
Biomassmass, productivity, loss, qualityParty and CycleFull material balance
Energyconsumption, generation, heat flowsnode and intervalresource efficiency
Datapercentage of valid observations, omissions, delay, versionstransducer/node: GRIDsuitability for management
  • Base - at least one full season or a reasonable historical series.
  • The unit of analysis is the object/area/layer/interval; aggregation retains the original granularity.
  • Both positive and zero results are published; excluding data requires a journal of reasons.

INFRASTRUCTURE / Pilot 3. Federated GRID measurements

Three independent nodes exchange not impersonal numbers, but passported results. Raw data may remain with the owner; agreed metadata, result, uncertainty, origin, and proof of test performance are transmitted to the outside.

Table 18 - Architecture of the minimum federation

LayerFunctionMandatory control
Node A - DimensionPrimary data acquisition and local calibrationtime, equipment, checksum, exception log
Node B - CalculationIndependent playback of the calculation from the transmitted packagecontainer/code, version, tests, determinism
Node C - VerificationBlind verification of outcome and budget uncertaintycriteria before disclosing the result
MetareisterUID, schemes, crosswalk, statuses E0-E4 and Z0-Z4Unchanged version log
Heritage archiveLong-term storage of evidence packagerights, format, migration, integrity control

Compatibility checks

  • The same unit does not guarantee the same measurand: definitions, scope, and method are compared.
  • Crosswalk exact is allowed only after independent verification; close and composite do not apply automatically.
  • The round-trip test confirms that converting back and forth does not change the meaning of critical fields.
  • The human owner of the solution remains explicit; AI offers anomalies and hypotheses, but does not raise evidence level.

0–36 MONTHS / Road map, management and solution

Table 19 - Stages without premature scaling

TimeframeResultGateway
0–3 monthsdictionaries, validation card, BIOC 1.0, passports and protocols of three pilotsapproved by measurand, owners and gates
4–9 monthsbudgets U, dynamic model, forecast passport, stand and backtestinginternal technical expertise
10–18 monthsthree reversible pilots, blind tests, E2, environmental/ethical assessmenthuman review and decision on external verification
19–27 monthsfederation of nodes, interlaboratory comparisons, results E3The Independent Board confirms the area
28–36 monthsoperational protocol, drift supervision, cost of ownership, scale decisionE4 only in the proven range

Division of roles

  • The scientific supervisor is responsible for hypothesis and interpretation; the metrologist is responsible for measurand, the model, traceability, and uncertainty.
  • The data owner is responsible for quality, rights and security; an independent verifier is not part of the team that benefits from success.
  • The ethical and ecological contour has the right to stop; the White Book Editorial Board approves only the status of the publication, not the scientific result.

EXPLANATORY BASE / Sources and editorial reservations

Date of access to electronic resources: 30 August 2026. Primary and official sources are provided. The specifications of the individual units apply only to these publications and are not transferred to future pilots without verification.

[1] BIPM — The International System of Units (SI), 9th edition, v4.01 (2026)

[2] JCGM — International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM): quantity dimension; measurement; uncertainty; traceability

[3] JCGM GUM-1:2023 — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement

[4] JCGM 100:2008 — Evaluation of measurement data (GUM)

[5] JCGM GUM-6:2020 — Developing and using measurement models

[6] NIST SP 811, Chapter 8 — derived quantities and SI units; mass density

[7] NIST — Quantum Information Science

[8] NIST — Quantum Measurement

[9] Gilmore et al. — Quantum-enhanced sensing with large trapped-ion crystals

[10] NIST — Spin-squeezing techniques and measurements below the standard quantum limit (2023)

[11] NIST — Atomic clocks as quantum sensors

[12] NIST — Neutral atom optical clocks

[13] ISO — ISO/IEC 17025:2017, competence of testing and calibration laboratories

[14] ILAC — P10: ILAC Policy on Metrological Traceability of Measurement Results

[15] BIPM — CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement

[16] Internal corpus — “White Paper of Destiny”, register of 344 works; 16 KON Principles; BAL-741; FIELD-741; ORION22:22

[17] Law of One - Densities (primary themed housing; used only for E0-description of tradition)

[18] Law of One — Synopsis (short internal diagram of tradition)

[19] Foundation for the Law of Time - History (author's concept history)

[20] Foundation for the Law of Time — Introduction to the Synchronic Order

[21] José Argoelles — 260 Postulates of the Dynamics of Time (author's text)

[22] W3C - PROV-O: The PROV Ontology (origin of data and actions)

[23] TDWG — Darwin Core Terms (official terms for biodiversity data exchange)

[24] OGC — SensorThings API, Part 1: Sensing (observation and sensor model)

[25] Nationale de France / Gallica — L’Archéométre, digital facsimile

[26] BnF Catalogue général — entry L'Archéométre, Saint-Yves d'Alveydre

[27] Internet Archive — L’Archéom?tre, backup digital copy

[28] Internet Archive — The Kybalion, Three Initiatives, Chicago, 1908, fax

[29] HathiTrust — The Kybalion: a study of the hermetic philosophy, catalog

[30] United Nations — Universal Declaration of Human Rights

[31] UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

Other published edition: QUANTUM MARKET OF DRUGS AND MEASUREMENTS Quantum_throw_density_and_measurements.pptx · Web Text +

From image to traceable system of solutions

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02

30 August 2026 · candidate of issue · register 344 not changed

The jump starts with a verifiable difference.

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 02

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 02

Quantum is called the resource of the sensor; a spurt is a proven improvement of a specific measurement task

OPERATIONAL DEFINITION

Basic system

New system

Decision

Size

recorded

U - reduced

Chain to SI

Saved

Independent

verification

Benefits above

Prices and risk

[Spiritual TRADITION/METAPHORE · E0] In the "Law of One" dansity is the stage of the spiritual evolution of consciousness; it is neither physical density nor proof of quantum transition.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Three densities require three denominators

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 03

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 03

One word does not make different quantities interchangeable

MATERIALS

ENERGY

INFORMATION

u = E / V

D = valid data / area

kg/m³

J/m³

A clear sign

SI physical magnitude

Physical size

Project metric

Rule: first call the numerator, denominator, unit and scope of applicability - only then compare.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Mass Density - Relationship to the Full Model

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 04

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 04

Even a simple formula requires a method, conditions, and budget of uncertainty.

METROLOGY SI

If m and V are independent

uᵣ(ρ) ≈ √[(u(m)/m)² + (u(V)/V)²]

For connected inputs, covariance is added. Temperature, humidity, sample geometry, and processing algorithm are all included in the model conditions.

SI unit: kg/m³

Only results with agreed definitions and conditions are comparable.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Energy is normalized by volume or mass

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 05

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 05

Two indicators answer different questions and should not merge into one rating

u = E / V

e = E / m

J/m³

J/kg

Volumetric Energy Density

specific energy

The passport is obliged to fix the ratio: "what" divide the energy and for what interval we observe the flow.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Information density exists only by agreement

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 06

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 06

Its value is not determined by the number of records, but by the validity and obvious denominator.

PROJECT METRICS

Examples of the denominator

valid data

Dinf =

• m³ Space

• seconds of observation

• object or event

• model version and sample

clearly declared area

“More data is = more knowledge.” We need validation, deduplication, origin and access rights.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

The word “measurement” has three different meanings.

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 07

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 07

Terms are diluted to formulas, models and physical hypotheses

DIMENSION OF VALUES

METROLOGY

Dependence on base quantities as a product of powers. For ρ: M L⁻³.

MODEL COORDINATES

Engineering

A sign, parameter, or state in the data engineering space: x₁...xₙ.

PHYSICAL MEASUREMENT

PHYSICS

Space-time freedom. It requires a separate physical theory and an observable consequence.

[REGARDING TIME] · E0/E1] Author's Frame X. Arguelles: 12:60 → 13:20 The fourth synchronous order is not a physical law.

TRIADA: Law of One - Density Change (E0) · Law of Time - Time Change (E0/E1) · SI/VIM - Measured Transition

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

The result is born from the measurement model

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 08

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 08

Number without model, unit and conditions is not a sufficient result

Y = f(X₁, X₂, …, Xₙ; θ) + Δ

Size

Method

Model

Observations

Result

y ± U · unit · Terms and Conditions · coverage · Traceability · Method/Version

Δ includes corrections and known imperfections of the model; they cannot be hidden in the word "accuracy".

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Quantum Resource Changes Sensor Limit

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 09

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 09

It does not cancel calibration, loss, decoherence, environment and read quality

EXAMPLE FROM METROLOGY

Standard

Quantum Limit

SQL

Quantum-Enhanced Area

You can’t transfer this gain to the entire measurement circuit or to another type of sensor without a new check.

Example NIST: 8,8 ± 0,4 dB below SQL for a specific circuit with an ion crystal.

The criterion for a jerk: the win should remain after a full budget of uncertainty and independent comparison.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Uncertainty is a budget, not a number

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 10

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 10

Quantum gain is important only where it reduces the final uncertainty of the result.

BUDGET SCHEME — NOT DATA

Sensor

Calibration

Wednesday

Sample

Model + Reading

contribution of each component is assessed and documented

uᵣ(ρ) ≈ √[(u(m)/m)² + (u(V)/V)²]

Decreasing one component does not guarantee a decrease in U: environment, model, or traceability can dominate.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Traceability connects the result with SI

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 11

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 11

Indissoluble documented calibration chain makes comparison portable

RESULT

CAlibrovka

ETHALON

Method + U

reference

defining constants

Each link is documented and brings its own uncertainty.

International recognition is supported by infrastructure CIPM MRA and policies ILAC.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Passport makes the measurement verifiable

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 12

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 12

One format links metrology, data, proof, rights and solution

QDM-PASS-0001

MEASUREMENT PASSPORT

Size and unit

Definition · SI / Project

Evidence

E0–E4 · independent verification

Model and version

Y=f(X;θ)+Δ · method code

Data

origin · integrity · access

Result

y ± U · terms · coverage

Rights and risks

Limitations · external effects

Traceability

· calibration links chain

Decision

Threshold · Owner · Review

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Status vector — model map, not a new world

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 13

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 13

Multivariate data helps to calculate; physical multidimensionality requires a separate experiment

x = [ x₁ x₂ x₃ … xₙ ]

Signal

Wednesday

Time

Quality

Operations: status assessment · forecast · control · anomaly detection

It should not be: "coordinate of the model = physical dimension". This is a categorical mistake.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

White paper links the model to the registers

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 14

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 14

The new issue receives a separate identifier; the confirmed database of 344 works is not rewritten

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02

BASIC REGISTER: 344 — NO CHANGES

candidate · separate version · own passport

BAL:C05:B10:S1 · BAL:C13:B11:S2 · BAL:C19:B06:S3

BAL‑741

context, balance, scale

S04:N04:D → S05:N14:K → S09:N17:R

FIELD‑741

Diagnostics → coordination → development

VAL–NEE–GOA · IND–SCN–RSK · DEC–REC–PRV

ORION 22:22

Meaning → Dimension → solution → memory; no physical theory

Symbolic layers = E0; physical approvals are verified E1 → E4.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Three pilots check the general method

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 15

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 15

Different scales, a single baseline and mandatory intersystem comparison

QUANTUM MAGNETOMETRY

Output: E2 → E3

B [Tl] · classic reference · full budget U · independent comparison

WATER · SOIL · FARMA

Output: E2 → E3

moisture, density, material and energy flows · data audit

FEDERAL GRID

Output: E2 → E3

3 Node · Single Passports · Reproducibility between sites

SPACE SCIENCES: Astronomy / Astrophysics · space geodesy · DZZ · Time/Frequency · Field / Particle

Facts - SI, U, and traceability; additional dimensions are a theory hypothesis.

Pilots - project proposals: equipment and characteristics have not yet been confirmed.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Validation map links approval to decision

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 16

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 16

One track shows what is stated, how it is measured, by whom and what solution is acceptable

VALMAP-KRPI-0001

CLAIM ID

HUGE

METHOD

DATA

E0–E4

GATE

Approval

unit

Standard

verification

decision

EXAMPLE OF THE TRANSACT

CLAIM-QDM-001

ρ = m/V · kg/m³

SOP-QDM-04 · SI

y ± U · E2

HOLD → RETEST

The solution cannot be restored without Claim ID, method version, data, U, E-level and gate owner.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Biocenose labels make observations comparable

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 17

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 17

Project code links water, soil and biota to method, scale, time and evidence

PROJECT SYNTAXIS · NOT EXTERNAL STANDARD

BIOC:<ENV>:<OBJ>:<STATE>:<METHOD>:<SCALE>:<TIME>:E#

BIOC:WATER:RIVER:QUALITY:LAB:S1:2026Q3:E2

water · river section · quality status · laboratory method

BIOC:SOIL:FIELD:DENSITY:CORE:S1:2026Q3:E2

soil · field · volume density · core selection

BIOC:BIOTA:PLOT:DIVERSITY:SURVEY:S1:2026Q3:E2

biota · test site · variety · metering

WORDS: Wednesday · object · Status · Method · scale · Time · E-level

Red line: not people marks and not an external standard. Application - pilot "pool-soil-farm".

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Dynamic Model of the Biosphere

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 18

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 18

The state of the biosphere, impacts and recovery are linked in the model being tested

MODEL · E1 → E3 · NOT THE ONLY LAW OF NATURE

water · soil · biota ·

climate · land use

Pollution · Control

F(xₜ,uₜ; θ)

Model of Transition

next state

BIOC-observations

SCENARIES: baseline → pressure → response → recovery

Seasonality · scale · U · Validation Gate · environmental stop-rules

The model checks scenarios and causal assumptions; it does not replace observations and independent verification.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Monitoring creates a calibrated forecast

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 19

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 19

Observations become a prediction with a range and probability — without masking uncertainty with one number

BIOC · DZZ · LAB

QC + U

STATE ESTIMATE

Observations

Quality

forecast

Operational · Seasonal ·

3 HORIZON

for each: interval · probability · model date · baseline/backtest

Backtest · drift · alerts · human review. Signaling is not an automatic solution.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Design begins with the target state

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 20

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 20

Limitations, alternatives and reversibility are set before technology and scale selection

TARGET

CONSTRAINTS

ALTERNATIVES

SIMULATION

target + invariants

rights + resources

options

multi-criteria

PILOT PORTFOLIO

HUMAN GATE

ADAPTIVE PLAN

BAL sets the balance · FIELD — Modules · ORION - powers, provenance and rights

Reversibility · stop-rules · without a single score · without irreversible automation.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

A symbolic map becomes useful when connections are typed

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 21

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 21

The semantic layer is separated from the measuring layer - and receives the provenance, version and verification

TWO ENTRANCE · ONE VERIFIED MARCHRUT

COSMORITMOLOGY

Archeometer

Author's term · E0/E1

Saint-Yves d’Alveydre · E0

rhythm → timestamp · Frequency of selection

period · phase · amplitude · unit · U

Posthumous Edition, 1911 · letters · Numbers

Colors · music · zodiac · multilayer scheme

SLOY

TYPE OF COMMUNICATION

PROVENANCE

Versions

TEST

Not a metrology device · not archaeometry · Not physical evidence.

The symbol turns into a working hypothesis only after operationalization and verification.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Kibalion asks seven questions, but not seven physical laws

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 22

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 22

Historical and philosophical framework 1908 years · Author of "Three Initiatives" · E0

CROSSWALK: EXAMPLE → CHECK QUESTION

MENTALISM

Model ≠ object

CONFORMITY

interscale hypothesis + test

VIBRATION

frequency · Amplitude · Spectrum or Metaphor

POLARITY

explicit axis · without people ranking

RITM

time series · period · phase · backtest

REASON / CONSEQUENCE

causal design + alternatives

GENDER

historical symbol · not bio-/socialclassification

E1 appears only after a falsified formulation. Metaphor does not become law from renaming.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Man remains the subject of decision.

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 23

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 23

Rights, challenge, and human decision limit the model at every level

PERSON-IN-BIOSPHERE · NOT EXPLOITATIONAL ANTHROPOCENTRISM

VALUE / WILL

RIGHTS AND PROTECTION

consent

Minimization

explainability

Challenge

human override

availability

Privacy

Benefits/Risk

STOP

DATA / EXPLANATORY NOTE

SOLUTION / ENSURING

BIOSPHERES / FUTURE GENERATIONS

Red line: no "ball of fate/value" and irreversible automatic high impact solution.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Galactic keys open only the gates being checked

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 24

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 24

Symbolic navigation E0/E1 · not physical portals and not astronomical coordinates

GKEY:VAL/OBJ/GEO/TIM/E/DEC/v

MEANING

MEMORY

RITM

REPLIES.

MASSHTAB

GKEY

8

Symbol

Image

Hypothesis

Model

surveillance

Pilot

Independent

verification

Validated

Result

It's good.

COMMUNICATIONS

MEASURES

STOP is possible on any gate

G0–G8 ORION: meaning · indicator · Authority · Action · provenance · Law

1 Meaning · 2 Rhythm · 3 Zoom · 4 Communications

5 Measure · 6 Proof · 7 Responsibility · 8 Memory

The key never authorizes a decision: the decision passes proof, rights, and the human gate.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

36 months: from dictionary to scale

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 25

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 25

Each stage is closed by evidence, not by a calendar date.

terms

Base

Passports

3 Pilot

E2

Validation

Decision on

Scale

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

10–18

19–27

28–36

Yes.

Yes.

Models

Standards

Budget U

Federation

E3

Gate of scale: value fixed · U better base · Traceability · E3 · Price/risk is acceptable. E4 — Only after independent reproduction.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Management keeps quality and boundaries

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 26

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 26

Metrology is responsible for the result; science is responsible for the hypothesis; management is responsible for the rights, risk and decision.

SCIENTIFIC ADVICE

GROWTH INDICATORS

Hypothesis · Protocol · E0–E4

• U relative to the base system

• inter-site reproducibility

• percent of full passports

• Traceability coverage

• resource for valid result

• rights and external harm — stop criterion

METROLOGICAL OWNER

Model · U · Traceability

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION

comparison · reproducibility

DECISION COUNCIL

Right · Risk · Scale

ISO/IEC 17025 - Laboratory competence framework; design solutions should be compatible with it.

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Decision: approve 90-day contour

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 27

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 27

Design creates a provable basis - without purchasing and scaling to pass the gate

ONTOLOGY AND METROLOGY

Values · Units · Models · base lines

PROTOCOLS AND PASSPORT

3 Pilot · U · Data · E0–E4

DAYS

GOVERNANCE AND GATE

Roles · Independent Inspection · Risk · Solution

Scale only after: fixed value · Best U · Traceability · E3 · Reasonable price and risk

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Registry 344 remains unchanged

BKS-CAND-KRPI-0001-M02 · Candidate of additional issue · Basic Registry: 344

Sources cited in presentation 56

  • No external sources; project synthesis.
  • [Presenter notes]
  • Hero asset: OpenAI ImageGen, generated in the current conversation and used only on this slide.
  • https://jcgm.bipm.org/vim/en/2.1.html
  • https://jcgm.bipm.org/vim/en/2.26.html
  • https://jcgm.bipm.org/vim/en/2.41.html
  • https://www.lawofone.info/c/Densities
  • https://www.nist.gov/pml/special-publication-811/nist-guide-si-chapter-8
  • https://jcgm.bipm.org/vim/en/1.7.html
  • https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6
  • https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/41483022/SI-Brochure-9-EN.pdf
  • https://www.nist.gov/pml/special-publication-330/sp-330-section-2
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
  • Information-density formulas are project definitions, not SI quantities.
  • https://lawoftime.org/history/
  • https://www.lawoftime.org/lawoftime/intro-to-the-synchronic-order.html
  • https://www.lawoftime.org/pdfs/260-Postulates-of-the-Dynamics-of-Time.pdf?dl=1
  • https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_GUM_6_2020.pdf/d4e77d99-3870-0908-ff37-c1b6a230a337
  • https://www.nist.gov/quantum-information-science
  • https://www.nist.gov/pml/quantum-measurement
  • https://www.nist.gov/publications/quantum-enhanced-sensing-displacements-and-electric-fields-large-trapped-ion-crystals
  • https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_GUM-1.pdf/74e7aa56-2403-7037-f975-cd6b555b80e6
  • https://www.bipm.org/en/cipm-mra
  • https://ilac.org/publications-and-resources/ilac-policy-series/
  • E0–E4 is an internal project evidence scale.
  • The model-coordinate distinction is project synthesis grounded in the VIM definition of quantity dimension.
  • Internal: /workspace/scratch/2f7f600de1f9/whitebook_build/source_extract.json
  • Internal: /workspace/scratch/2f7f600de1f9/whitebook_build/registry_analysis.json
  • https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/neutral-atom-optical-clocks
  • Internal: White Book project synthesis.
  • Internal: BIOC tag syntax is a project proposal, not an external standard.
  • Internal: dynamic biosphere state-space model is a project hypothesis/model.
  • Internal: forecast horizons and controls are project proposals.
  • Internal: project construction and human-gate synthesis.
  • https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bd6t5750345t
  • https://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb31285772h
  • https://archive.org/details/archeometre/SaintYvesDAlveydre-LArcheometre%5B1911-FR%5D
  • https://archive.org/download/archeometre/SaintYvesDAlveydre-LArcheometre%5B1911-FR%5D_text.pdf
  • Dating note: BnF catalogue gives [s.d.]; the facsimile contains a 1911 preface. The deck therefore labels it a posthumous 1911 edition.
  • Cosmorhythmology is used here as a project-authored term at E0/E1, not as an external scientific discipline.
  • https://archive.org/details/kybalionstudyofh00init
  • https://archive.org/stream/kybalionstudyofh00init/kybalionstudyofh00init_djvu.txt
  • https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009777032
  • https://archive.org/download/kybalionstudyofh00thre/kybalionstudyofh00thre.pdf
  • The 1908 work is attributed on the title page to the anonymous 'Three Initiates'; the deck does not attribute factual authorship to Hermes.
  • The seven-principle crosswalk is a project interpretation. It does not claim seven physical laws.
  • https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
  • https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
  • Human-in-the-biosphere framing is project synthesis; it rejects exploitative anthropocentrism and preserves the rights of future generations.
  • GKEY, its eight keys, typed address syntax, and mapping to G0–G8/ORION are project synthesis at E0/E1.
  • The term is symbolic navigation only; it does not describe physical portals or astronomical coordinates.
  • Canonical evidence scale: E0 symbol/image; E1 hypothesis/model; E2 observation/pilot; E3 independent verification; E4 validated result. Protocol and decision remain governance gates, not evidence levels.
  • Roadmap timing and gates are project proposals.
  • E4 is not assigned by calendar; it requires independent reproducibility, regardless of the 36-month horizon.
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html
  • Recommended decision: authorize a 90-day design phase only; procurement and scale-up remain gated.

Published files

Science · Full published text

Academic Infrastructure of “Revival of the Earth”

Source Status: Primary Document

Architecture of Academic Registers, Knowledge and Institutions of the “Revival of the Earth” programme.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/akademicheskaya-infrastruktura-vozrozhdenie-zemli

Open on the site
Prepared for Sergey LeonidovichWorking version 26 August 2026

SECTION 01

Action to be taken

To create a modern federal academic infrastructure that uses the strong system principles of the Academy of Sciences USSR without reproducing its administrative and political model.

“Rebirth of the Earth” — mission; academic institutions — execution infrastructure; academic registries — trust and management infrastructure.

Towards the end 36- a monthly cycle should operate a network of profile institutional contours and territorial nodes, combined 16 interconnected registers. For each solution, a traceable chain is maintained: source → Method → Data → Conclusion → Technology → Event → Measured effect → independent verification.

№DecisionContents
1Approve FrameIt is not the legal restoration of the AN USSR, but a modern network based on its strong organizational principles.
2Appointing ownersThe Higher Academic Council, the Scientific and Methodological Council, the platform operator and the owners of domain registries.
3Run 16 registersUniform identifiers, object passports, rules of evidence, versions and communications.
4Choose a pilot3–5 Territories, 5 priority issues, a single baseline and independent verification.
5Consolidate the legal regimeData, rights, access, security, conflict of interest and appeals.
6Provide a long horizonSeparate funding of science, infrastructure and projects with public audit.

SECTION 02

Why new infrastructure is needed

Today, knowledge, equipment, projects, territories, and evidence often exist in separate circuits.

The problem is not the lack of science as such. The gap arises between the accumulated knowledge and the ability to turn it into coordinated programmes for the restoration of territories. Organizations describe themselves differently, methods are not always associated with data sets, pilots are associated with the baseline, and the claimed effect is with independent verification.

  • Fragmentation of institutions. Competencies and infrastructure are accounted for locally; inter-institutional search is built manually.
  • Evidence gap. Publication, data set, technology, pilot and confirmed effect are mixed as equivalent results.
  • A short project horizon. Fundamental research, observation series and operation of unique installations do not fit into the usual grant cycle.
  • opaque continuity. The history of institutions, collections, schools, and assets is rarely described as a chain of transformations with sources.
  • Difficulty scaling. Pilot success does not automatically turn into reproducible technology for another territory.

Target Chain

SECTION 03

Historical model of AN USSR

Functional reconstruction of mature architecture 1963–1991; names and composition changed over the periods.

The strength of the system lay not only in the number of institutions, but in the related contours of governance, disciplinary specialization, regional centres and common infrastructure. Charter 1963 called the Research Institute the main bodies of research activities; laboratories, stations, observatories, libraries, museums, botanical gardens, expeditions, auxiliary institutions and enterprises operated nearby. [H1]

LevelFunction
State ContourCouncil of Ministers USSR; prioritization and reporting of the Academy.
General MeetingThe highest body: the directions of science, elections, key organizational decisions.
PresidencyPlans, estimates, structure, specialization of institutions, coordination of councils and commissions.
Sections and officesDisciplinary development of science and management of the relevant network of institutions.
Scientific adviceInter-institutional and inter-agency complex problems; are not identical to research institutes.
Regional contoursDepartments, research centers and branches for the tasks of macroregions.
Research Institutes and UnitsInstitutions, departments, laboratories, sectors and groups are direct research.

SECTION 04

Disciplinary departments and regional contours

The normative image of 1963 shows a combination of scientific-industrial and territorial principles.

Charter Section 1963Branches
Physical, technical and mathematical sciencesMathematics; general physics and astronomy; nuclear physics; physical and technical problems of energy; mechanics and control processes.
Chemical-technological and biological sciencesGeneral and technical chemistry; physico-chemistry and technology of inorganic materials; biochemistry, biophysics and chemistry of physiologically active compounds; physiology; general biology.
Earth SciencesGeology, geophysics and geochemistry; oceanology, atmospheric physics and geography.
Social sciencesHistory; philosophy and law; economics; literature and language.

Territorial Logic

ContourValue
Central centresMoscow - Presidium and a significant part of the institutions; Leningrad is a large complex of institutes, library and archival institutions. The Leningrad Scientific Center was established in 1983.
Siberian BranchIt was founded in 1957. Principles: comprehensiveness of research, practical implementation, training. Novosibirsk Akademgorodok is the core of a wide regional network. [H4]
Ural BranchBranch with 1932 years → the Scientific Center 1971 years → the Department of 1987 years. Linking fundamental science, resources, industry and regional challenges. [H]5]
Far Eastern BranchBranch in SB AN USSR → the Scientific Center 1970 years → the Department of 1987 years. Ocean, bioresources, geology, seismicity and macroregion development. [H]6]
Specialized centresPushchino, Chernogolovka, Troitsk: territorial clusters of independent institutions and common infrastructure.

SECTION 05

Common infrastructure of mature academic system

The long scientific cycle was supported not only by institutions, but also by common facilities, services and personnel.

ContourComposition
ExperimentalUnique installations, observatories, polygons, stations, stationary, fleet, expeditions, collections.
ComputationalComputing centers and machine complexes for modeling, algorithms and collective access.
Engineering and InnovationSKB, design and technological institutes, experimental plants and experimental production.
Information and memoryLibraries, archives, museums, collections, catalogues, reference and bibliographic systems.
Publishing HouseEditorial and publishing board, magazines, publishing house "Science", printing houses, distribution.
Personnel and educationalPostgraduate studies, basic departments, universities, specialized schools and scientific seminars.
Territorial-householdAcademgorodok, housing, medicine, transport and economic services - providing the contour.

Functional Heritage Formula

the Scientific School → fundamental research → experimental base → design development → Experienced sample → implementation → new research tasks

SECTION 06

What to preserve, modernize and not reproduce

Historical heritage is used as a set of verifiable organizational principles, not as a ready-made administrative form.

ModeDecision
SaveLong horizon; scientific schools; fundamental research; interdisciplinary programs; regional bases; general installations; libraries and archives; science, engineering and education links.
ModernizeFederated network instead of a single departmental outline; open metadata standards; independent expertise; digital traceability; transparent funding; international interoperability.
Do not reproduceAdministrative monopoly; political dependence of scientific evaluation; closed assignments; non-transparent allocation of resources; formal KPI; prohibition of scientific disagreement.

SECTION 07

The Doctrine of Earth Revival

The object of management is not a separate industry, but the state of natural and anthropogenic systems of the territory.

The mission of the program is to create scientifically based, verifiable and scalable solutions for the restoration of natural systems, the sustainability of infrastructure and the quality of life. Each goal is translated into the observed indicators of the state of the atmosphere, waters, soils, biodiversity, environmental health, resource efficiency and man-made risks.

PrinciplePractical rule
SystematicityThe decision is evaluated on a full set of interrelated implications, including the transfer of risk between environments and territories.
EvidenceSource, method, data, uncertainty and independent verification are recorded together with the conclusion.
TerritorialityPrograms start with a territory passport and a baseline, not pre-selected technology.
ReproducibilityThe pilot becomes the basis for scaling only after describing the conditions of applicability and re-checking.
Openness by defaultMetadata and results are as open as law, security and ethics allow.
Scientific freedomThe Register retains competing hypotheses and status of the dispute; the administrative status does not declare scientific truth.

SECTION 08

Target architecture

Three levels link institutions, programs, and evidence.

LevelFunction
I. Institutional levelProfile institutional contours, scientific schools, departments, territorial centers, laboratories, CSP, collections and personnel programs.
II. Programme levelMission programs, projects, consortia, polygons, agreements, resources, timelines, risks and outcome indicators.
III. Register level16 academic registers, a single core of identifiers, classifiers, passports, evidence, versions, and access.

The Federal Principle

  • Institutions retain responsibility for primary data and domain expertise.
  • A single academic core specifies identifiers, classifiers, and trust procedures.
  • Metadata is indexed centrally; private or big data can remain with the owner.
  • The platform operator provides accessibility and integration, but does not change the scientific conclusions.

SECTION 09

Institute infrastructure: 19 contours

These are project competency profiles. They can be designed as new institutions, network centers or inter-institutional programs after a separate decision.

ClusterInstitutional contours
A. Earth System01 Earth systems and geodynamics; 02 atmosphere and climate; 03 hydrosphere and water resources; 04 soil and land use; 05 biodiversity and biogeocenoses.
B. Ecosystems and health06 Forests and landscapes; 07 Oceans and cryospheres; 08 Human ecology and public health; 09 Agrobiotechnologies and food.
C. Environmental technologies10 Energy; 11 materials and chemical technologies; 12 cities, construction and infrastructure; 13 Transport and Logistics; 14 Robotics and Aerospace Monitoring.
D. Digital management15 Mathematics, AI and digital twins; 16 Economics and Management; 17 Law, Standards and Security.
E. Civilization and continuity18 education, culture and civilization studies; 19 heritage, archives and knowledge management.

Obligatory common platforms

  • a collective use center and metrological service;
  • unified library-archival and publishing infrastructure;
  • computing center, data storage and geoinformation circuit;
  • engineering and design and experimental production base;
  • academic postgraduate studies, basic departments and school of scientific leaders;
  • field service, stations, expeditions and long-term monitoring.

SECTION 10

Missionary programs

The institutional contours are unified around the measurable problem of territory, not just discipline.

CodeProgrammeFocus
MP-01Water and swimming poolsWater quality, hydrological regime, sources of pollution, water supply, restoration of rivers and swamps.
MP-02Soils and productive landscapesDegradation, erosion, fertility, carbon storage, reclamation and sustainable land use.
MP-03Biodiversity and ecosystem connectivityInventory, protection of key territories, restoration of populations and ecological corridors.
MP-04Climatic adaptationExtreme events, forest fires, permafrost, coastal risks, sustainability of cities and infrastructure.
MP-05Industrial areas and citiesAccumulated damage, waste, air, water, materials, energy efficiency and safe conversion.
MP-06Environment health and food sustainabilityEnvironmental health, food safety, agroecosystems and risk prevention.

SECTION 11

Academic registers: 16 domains

Not an archive of lists, but a linked infrastructure of identity, origin, and evidence.

CodeRegisterSubstantive content
AR-01Organizations and unitsAcademy, branches, centers, institutes, laboratories, stations, branches; legal status, profile and powers.
AR-02Researchers and collectivesCompetences, qualifications, scientific schools, project and expert role, conflicts of interest.
AR-03Councils, schools and consortiaCouncils, commissions, interdisciplinary platforms and project consortia.
AR-04Programs and projectsProblem, hypotheses, performers, stages, dependencies, results, timing, and status.
AR-05Infrastructure and equipmentLaboratories, installations, ranges, ships, stations, CSPs, calibration and availability.
AR-06Funding and commitmentsSources of funds, limits, contracts, deposits, co-financing and performance control.
AR-07Methods and standardsMeasurement methods, protocols, quality standards, dictionaries, ontologies, versions and applicability.
AR-08Collections and samplesBiological, genetic, geological, soil and other collections; origin and preservation.

SECTION 11 • CONTINUATION

Registers of scientific knowledge and practical action

CodeRegisterSubstantive content
AR-09Territories and ecosystemsBoundaries, system type, initial state, mode of use, loads and responsible.
AR-10Monitoring and MeasurementsObservation points, sensors, series, periodicity, calibration, quality, omissions and uncertainty.
AR-11Data, models and softwareSources, structure, versions, licenses, inputs and outputs, limitations and validation.
AR-12Publications and archivesArticles, reports, dissertations, maps, field journals, archival sources and peer review.
AR-13Technology and PilotsScientific basis, developer, readiness, testing, safety and scaling.
AR-14Rights, Licenses and AccessPatents, programs, databases, know-how, rights holders and mode of use.
AR-15Risks, scenarios and recommendationsRisk sources, horizon, probability, uncertainty, scenarios and recommendation status.
AR-16Activities and Confirmed EffectsSource line, target, territory, resources, event, indicators, result and independent verification.

SECTION 12

Unified object passport and link graph

Each record receives a permanent identifier, origin, version, and verifiable relationship with other objects.

BlockMandatory content
1. IdentificationCode, type, official and short name, synonyms, classifiers.
2. ResponsibilityRecord holder, primary data custodian, supervisor, update operator, expert and reviewer.
3. Scientific contentProblem, subject, purpose, hypothesis, discipline, applicability, and limitations.
4. Space and TimeTerritory, coordinates, scale, period, dates of creation and rechecking.
5. MethodologyMethodology and version, equipment, conditions, units, calibration and quality control.
6. OriginPrimary source, authorship, data, checksums, conversions, peer review and reproducibility.
7. QualityCompleteness, accuracy, error, omissions, assumptions, and uncertainty.
8. ContactsOrganizations, people, projects, territories, observations, data, publications, technologies, risks and indicators.
9. Law and EthicsCopyright holder, license, access, personal and sensitive data, security.
10. Status and versionRecord status, change grounds, previous version, replacement, signature and date.

Compatibility of identifiers

  • ORCID - for the stable identification of researchers and the connection with their contribution. [D2]
  • ROR - for the open identification of research organizations. [D3]
  • DOI/DataCite — for publications, datasets, models and other research results. [D4]
  • An internal academic identifier does not replace external identifiers, but links them together in a single graph.

SECTION 13

Evidence, status and life cycle

The register records the quality of the procedure and the origin of the information, but does not declare the scientific truth an administrative decision.

ParameterQuestion to be checked
OriginIs the author, source and custodian of the primary materials known?
MethodAre the methods, version, equipment and conditions for obtaining the result determined?
QualityAre completeness, error, uncertainty and control indicated?
VerificationWas there an internal, external, or reproducible test?
RelevanceDoes the date, territory and scope of the claimed scope correspond?

Recording Life Cycle

Project → Presented → Technically verified → Expertly considered → Ongoing → Requires updating → replaced → Archival

  • Additional statuses: challenged, restricted in use, withdrawn.
  • The fix creates a new version; history and reasons for the change persist.
  • The author of the result can not be its only examiner.
  • The recipient of the financing does not confirm the final social or environmental effect alone.
  • Principles FAIR apply to metadata and data: findability, availability, compatibility, and reuse. [D1]

SECTION 14

System Management

Separation of scientific, regulatory, technical, operational and verification responsibilities.

ParticipantCredentials
the Higher Academic CouncilDefines missions and scientific priorities; approves interdisciplinary programs.
Scientific and Methodological CouncilApproves standards of evidence, classifiers, methods and rules of examination.
the Board of Registry OwnersManage domains, data requirements and update procedures.
Platform OperatorProvides operation, integration, availability, protection, journaling and reservation.
Institutions and regional nodesCreate, store and update primary information; bear scientific responsibility.
Data CuratorsControl the completeness, quality of metadata and timing of updating.
Independent expertsCheck methods, results and claimed effects; independent of the project executor.
Ethics and Security CommitteeDefines sensitive, personal, genetic and dual-use data.
Audit of registersVerifies authority, compliance with procedures and the immutability of the history of records.

SECTION 15

Roles in the project ecosystem

Integrations are described as the proposed distribution of functions; legal powers are fixed by separate documents.

ContourProposed function
Academic RegistersCanonical identification, origin, techniques, expert statuses and evidence.
EQUILIBRIUMSemantic integration, graph connections, monitoring, analytics, projections, and digital twins; the model is separate from the fact.
SFERAOpen and partner portal, initiatives, competitions, communication and knowledge dissemination.
ECO-PPAOutline of software agreements: baseline, target, commitments, resources, indicators, report and verification.
SPECZASHCHITAPilot performance, production cooperation, organization of tests and transfer of actual data.

SECTION 16

Data, rights, ethics and security

Openness should be combined with protected access modes and responsibility for primary information.

ModeApplication
OpenPublic metadata, publications, general indicators, open datasets and methodologies.
Academically LimitedThe data is available to verified researchers on terms of use and citation.
ServiceMaterials of current examination, design and internal management.
ConfidentialCommercial secrecy, personal data, contractual restrictions and sensitive technologies.
SpecialGenetic data, dual-use data, biosecurity and other regimes by law.
  • Right. For data, methods, software and technologies, the author, copyright holder, license and permissible use are fixed.
  • Origin. Files have checksums, versions, timestamps, and conversion logs.
  • Ethics. Consent, minimization of personal data, protection of vulnerable groups and work with biomaterials are regulated.
  • Security. Access is built on roles and attributes; critical operations are signed and logged.
  • Appeal. The author or organization may challenge the expert status; the dispute is maintained as a separate object with evidence of the parties.

SECTION 17

Financial model

Different types of activities require different funding horizons and rules.

ContourPurpose
Basic institutionalScientific schools, core staff, archives, collections, long series of observations and basic laboratories.
InfrastructureUnique installations, CPU, calculations, expeditions, stations, repair and life cycle of equipment.
Competitive softwareMission Studies and Inter-Institutional Programs with Independent Expertise.
Project agreementPilots and implementation through ECO-PPA: objectives, baseline, commitments, resources, performance and verification.
Co-financingRegions, companies, foundations and philanthropists - in case of a transparent conflict of interest and the publication of conditions.
CommercializationLicenses, services, devices and technologies; revenue does not substitute for scientific evaluation and does not close the mandatory metadata.

SECTION 18

Pilot launch

The pilot checks not only the software, but also the institutional rules of trust.

StepResult
1. TerritoriesChoose 3–5 territories of different types: urban agglomeration, industrial hub, river basin, agricultural and natural landscape.
2. Reference lineAgree on the territory passport, key indicators, data sources, quality and observation period.
3. InventoryDescribe institutions, experts, laboratories, facilities, data, methods, and existing projects.
4. ChallengesApprove 3–5 priority problems with hypotheses, risks and verifiable goals.
5. Registry CoreStart AR-01, 02, 04, 07, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 16 as a minimum sufficient set.
6. ConsortiumsForm inter-institutional teams, data owners and independent reviewers.
7. Public resultOpen maps of territories, methods, project progress, indicators and verification reports.

Pilot exit in 12 months

  • approved regulations and passport records;
  • A working metadata directory and link graph;
  • the first 10 registers with responsible owners;
  • portfolio of mission projects in pilot territories;
  • at least two completed independent verification cycles;
  • public report on data quality, duplicates, gaps and scaling solutions.

SECTION 19

Road map for 36 months

Scaling follows the rule check, not precedes it.

TimeframeStageResult
0–3 monthsNormative designConcept, advice and operator; provisions; ontology; identifiers; passport; evidence; pilot criteria.
4–6 monthsInventory and prototypeHistorical and modern organizations; data owners; classifiers; prototype cards and integrations.
7–12 monthsMVP and pilot territoriesThe first 10 registers; consortia; baseline; observations; projects; independent verification; public portal.
13–24 monthsTechnological contourAll 16 Registers; CCP; rights; financing; models; ECO-PPA; SPECZASHCHITA; repeated measurements.
25–36 monthsScalingNew institutions and regions; regulatory consolidation; international interoperability; sustainable financing; audit.

SECTION 20

Outcome indicators

KPI measure the quality of the scientific and management contour, and not the formal completeness of the base.

Area of workIndicator
Traceability≥ 90% active records have source, owner, method/base and version history.
Identification≥ 95% organizations, people and results are associated with sustainable external or internal identifiers.
Relevance≥ 85% records are updated within the domain deadline; delays are visible publicly or to the auditor.
Independent verification100% declared end effects have an external inspection and proof package.
ReuseIncreasing number of projects reusing data, methods and infrastructure of other institutions.
Inter-institutional connectivityThe share of programs with the participation of ≥ 3 independent institutional contours and territorial unit.
InfrastructureCPU loading, open access share time, standby time and operation cost.
ScalingThe number of solutions reproduced in the second territory with a confirmed effect.
WorkforceTrained researchers, data engineers, curators and independent verifiers.

SECTION 21

Risks and controls

The key threats are at the intersection of science, management, data and financing.

RiskLevelControl measure
Politicization of scientific assessmentHighIndependent councils, publication of minority opinions, appeal, separation of scientific and administrative roles.
BureaucratizationHighMinimum passport, automatic inheritance of metadata, measurement of time to maintain and remove unclaimed fields.
Duplication of systemsMediumIntegration audit, ROR/ORCID/DOI, metadata directory instead of copying all data.
Closed Expert CircleHighRotation, open criteria, conflict of interest, external reviewers and publication of decision statistics.
Formal KPIHighFocus on reuse, reproducibility, and confirmed effect rather than number of records.
Disputes about IPMediumRights and licenses prior to the start of the project; model agreements; separate register AR-14.
Sensitive dataHighAccess classification, minimization, audit, protected computing and ethical expertise.
Unstable fundingHighMulti-year commitments to basic infrastructure and separate project accounting.

SECTION 22

Launch Solutions

Proposed package of the first management meeting.

№Draft decision
01Approve the concept and the legal reservation of the inheritance without a declaration of succession.
02Approve the principles: federality, evidence, scientific freedom, versions, independent verification and openness by default.
03To form the Higher Academic and Scientific-Methodological Councils; to approve the rules of conflict of interest.
04To appoint the operator and owners of 16 domain registries; to fix the operator’s non-interference in scientific conclusions.
05Approve classifiers of the first level, a single passport of the object and the model of evidence.
06Select pilot territories, institutes and independent verifiers; appoint the owners of the baseline.
07Approve the budget for 12 months, security audit, data rights and public reporting.
08Assign a control point through 6 months and scaling decision through 12 months.

Result

The task of the project is not to collect another database and not to reproduce the historical vertical. The task is to restore the coherence of science: from school and institute to territory, technology and testable effect.

SECTION 23

Annex A. Types of historical register entities

The historical layer requires a particularly strict distinction of organizational forms.

TypeDefinition for registry
InstitutePermanent Scientific Organization.
Scientific CenterA territorial or problem complex of several organizations.
OfficeManagement body on disciplinary or territorial principle.
BranchA territorial subdivision or historical association of institutions; meaning depends on the period.
Scientific CouncilCoordinating body without a mandatory own research base.
CommissionPermanent or temporary expert body.
ExpeditionA temporary research program or organizational unit.
Station / ObservatoryScientific object or specialized institution; type is fixed separately.
Design BureauEngineering development and preparation of implementation.
Experienced factoryProduction and verification of prototypes.
Archive / LibraryStorage, description and provision of scientific heritage.

SECTION 24

Annex B. Sources and standards

Historical facts are based on primary and official materials; the digital model is based on open international principles of identification and data.

[H1] Statute of the Academy of Sciences USSR 1963 — digitized primary text
https://opentextnn.ru/old/history/historiografy/institut/ran/index.html%40id%3D3878

[H2] RAS: the history of the Academy in the Soviet period
https://www.ras.ru/about/history/sovietcountry.aspx

[H3] RAS: Official Status and Succession
https://www.ras.ru/about.aspx

[H4] SB RAS: history and education decree
https://web.sbras.ru/ru/cmn/general

[H5] UrO RAS: historical background
https://uran.ru/about/hist

[H6] DVO RAS: official history
https://new.ras.ru/structures/regionalnye-otdeleniya-ran/dalnevostochnoe-otdelenie-ran/

[H7] Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences: history of the institution
https://www.arran.ru/node/3

[H8] BEN RAS: the history of the academic library network
https://www.benran.ru/about-library/library-history/

[D1] GO FAIR: FAIR Principles
https://www.gofair.us/fair-principles

[D2] ORCID: Persistent Investigator Identifiers
https://info.orcid.org/what-is-orcid/

[D3] ROR: open identifiers of research organizations
https://ror.org/about/

[D4] DataCite: persistent research results identifiers
https://datacite.org/

Other published edition: Earth Revival_Earth_Academic_Registries.pptx · web text +

Institutional infrastructure and academic registers

Mission → Institutes → Program → Evidence → Confirmed Effect

Heritage as a source of principles,

and not the legal restoration of the USSR Academy of Sciences

Knowledge does not yet form the contour of action

PROJECT HYPOTHESIS

The gap arises not only because of a lack of research, but between knowledge, decision and result.

Institutions

Methods and data

Competencies and equipment are described locally

Difficult to compare origin and quality

Request for territory

Effect

It rarely becomes an inter-institutional program.

not always associated with the baseline and verification

Objective: Objective → Knowledge → solution → measurable effect → independent verification

What worked in the academic model USSR

HISTORICAL FACTS

The strong point was the connected infrastructure, not a separate organization.

General Meeting

and Bureau

STRATEGY

Sections, offices

and scientific advice

SCIENCE

Regional offices

and research centres

TERRITORIES

Institutes, laboratories,

Stations and Expeditions

EXECUTION

Installations, calculations,

libraries, archives, personnel

GENERAL BASE

Structure and names changed by periods - the registry stores dates and conversions

Preserve principles — change the model

DRAFT RECOMMENDATION

HERITAGE

NEW ENVIRONMENT

PROTECTORS

Save

Modernize

Do not reproduce

• scientific schools

• long horizon

• interdisciplinary

• territorial bases

• General installations

• federated network

• open identifiers

• compatible data

• independent examination

• transparent financing

• administrative monopoly

• politicization of evaluation

• closed appointments

• opacity of resources

• formal KPI

The modern system borrows connectivity — and introduces verifiable rules of trust.

Mission "Rebirth of the Earth"

PROJECT OFFER

Combine scientific activities around measurable restoration of life systems.

Natural systems

Sustainability of Territories

land, water, forests, biodiversity

Climate and technological risks

Health and safety

Proven Scaling

Environmental quality and food sustainability

decisions are postponed only after re-checking

Architecture of three levels

PROJECT OFFER

Institutions create knowledge, programs turn it into action, and registries provide trust.

INSTITUTES

Personnel • Research • Laboratories • Schools • Standards

PROGRAMMES

Tasks • consortia • polygons • resources • implementation

III

REGISTERS

IDs • Communications • evidence • Version • Access

Integrations: EQUILIBRIUM • SFERA • ECO-PPA • SPECZASHCHITA

Network of institutes: 19 functional contours

PROJECT OFFER

geodynamics • climate • water • soil • biodiversity

Earth System

Forests • Ocean • Health • Food

Ecosystems and health

Not necessarily 19 new legal entities is a network of competencies, centers and programs.

energy • materials • cities • transport • monitoring

Environmental technologies

Mathematics • AI • economy • Law • Security

Digital management

The shape of each contour is approved separately.

Education • Culture • Archives • Knowledge Management

Continuity

Common base: CCC • calculations • Archives • Engineering • Personnel • Field Networks

Academic Registers - Trust Infrastructure

PROJECT OFFER

16 domain registries work as a single knowledge graph, not as a set of tables.

AR-01—04

AR-05—08

Institutions

Resources and rules

organizations • researchers • tips • programs

Equipment • financing • methods • Collections

AR-09—12

AR-13—16

Scientific knowledge

Practical Action

Territory • monitoring • data • publications

Technology • Law • Risks • Confirmed effect

Unified digital passport of the object

PROJECT OFFER

Each object receives a verifiable, linked, and versioned history.

LINKS

• projects • territories

IDENTITY

PROOF

ID • type • status

source • method • data

PASSPORT

OBJECT

RESPONSIBILITY

RIGHTS AND RISKS

Owner • Keeper

Access • License • Ethics

VERSION

history • signature • substitution

ORCID • ROR • DOI/DataCite + Internal Academic ID

From the problem of territory to a scalable solution

PROJECT PROCESS

The register links the initial state, the scientific task, the pilot and the proven result.

Profile

Challenge

Consortium

Pilot

Validation

Status

and restrictions

Objective

and measurement

Competences

and resources

Protocol

and control

effect

and scale

Scaling is allowed only after independent verification and description of the conditions of applicability.

Managing without conflict of roles

PROJECT OFFER

Strategy, execution, data and independent verification are separated.

Academic Council

Priorities and Scientific Integrity

KEY RULE

Registry owners

semantics, quality and actualization

The operator does not change the scientific conclusion

Program Office

portfolio, contracts and stage control

It provides identifiers, availability, protection, and version log.

The effect is confirmed by the independent side.

Independent Panels

Validation, appeals and conflict of interest

Territorial Councils

request, polygons and implementation

Pilot for 12 months

PROJECT OFFER

3–5 Territories

Different natural and economic conditions

Single reference line

Passports, indicators, sources and quality

months to prove the working capacity of the mechanism - not to create a big bureaucracy

5 priority calls

Hypotheses and measurable goals

MVP 10

Owners, protocols and link graph

Independent verification

public opinion and decision on the scale of

Output: Metadata directory • 10 Registries • Consortiums • Public Quality Report

Road map for 36 months

PROJECT OFFER

Scaling begins only after quality control points.

7–12

13–24

25–36

CONCEPT

PROTOTIP

MVP

Fields

MASSHTAB

Advice • operator • ontology

Regulations • passport • pilots

10 Registries • Consortiums

Tests • Integration • Audit

standards • regions • stability

Checkpoint 12 Months: Data Owners + Update + independent examination + Re-use

Launch decision

PROPOSED SOLUTIONS

Design and piloting are now required.

Approve the concept and basic principles

PACKAGE OF THE FIRST MEETING

RECONSTRUCTION

RELATIONSHIP

SCIENCE

Appointing an Employer and Academic Council

Define operator 16 academic registers

Approve passport, classifiers and data policy

the School and Institute

to the territory, technology

and testable effect

Select a pilot budget and independent audit

Sergey Leonidovich • working version • 26.08.2026

Sources cited in presentation 12

  • OpenAI ImageGen, generated for this deck, 2026-08-26.
  • Project synthesis prepared for this deck, 2026.
  • [/Sources]
  • The Charter of the Academy of Sciences USSR 1963 years: https://opentextnn.ru/old/history/historiografy/institut/ran/index.html%40id%3D3878
  • RAS, history of the Academy in the Soviet period: https://www.ras.ru/about/history/sovietcountry.aspx
  • SB RAS, official historical reference: https://web.sbras.ru/ru/cmn/general
  • BEN RAS, history of the academic library network: https://www.benran.ru/about-library/library-history/
  • GO FAIR, FAIR Principles: https://www.gofair.us/fair-principles
  • Archive RAS: https://db.isaran.ru/
  • ORCID: https://info.orcid.org/what-is-orcid/
  • ROR: https://ror.org/about/
  • DataCite: https://datacite.org/

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

The Archeometer and Cosmorhythmology of SPECZASHCHITA

Source Status: Primary Document

The material links symbolic systems, cycles, and cosmorhythmology with the architecture of EQUILIBRIUM.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/arkheometr-i-kosmoritmologiya

Open on the site
StatusConceptual and technical version 1.0
PurposeOutline of analysis, forecasting and coordination of solutions SPECZASHCHITA
Basic modelArcheometer = Universal Function of Development + Harmonisation Operator
Time LayerCosmoritmology = measured system of cycles, phases and windows of solutions

The key principle is to measure - synchronize - predict - harmonize - act.

1. Summary of document

The document determines the place of the Archeometer and Cosmoritmology in the system SPECZASHCHITA. The archeometer is interpreted as a computable meta-operator that evaluates the state of a multi-dimensional system, measures the deviation from a stable developing mode and forms a control effect. Cosmoritmology sets a time-cycle layer: a calendar of repeating natural, technological, social, and astronomically confirmed cycles used to plan observations, scenarios, and decision windows.

SPECZASHCHITA in this architecture does not act as an abstract idea, but as an executive circuit: receives data, checks them, calculates indices, forms scenarios, determines permissible actions, launches pilots and controls the actual effect.

SPECZASHCHITA = Monitoring → Archeometer → Cosmoritm → Decision → Implementation → Feedback

2. Methodological status

For practical applicability, the system shares three levels of statements:

  • measured physical and astronomical cycles - the rotation of the Earth, the annual cycle, the lunar synodic cycle, solar activity and other observed periodicities;
  • system and mathematical models - dynamic systems, graph theory, spectral analysis, entropy, percolation, Lyapunov indicators, attractors;
  • hypotheses about the correlation of cycles with social or cognitive phenomena are allowed only as testable hypotheses and are not declared causal laws without statistical validation.

This separation is fundamental: it allows us to use a broad concept of cosmorhythmology without mixing scientifically confirmed cycles with speculative correlations.

3. Archeometer: definition and function

Archeometer is a universal development function and operator of harmonization of a multidimensional system. Its task is to translate heterogeneous data into a single state space and answer five questions: what is happening; how stable the state is; in what direction it changes; where the critical threshold is located; what impact improves the balance without destroying diversity.

X(t) = [x₁(t), x₂(t), …, xₙ(t)]ᵀ

X(t) is the normalized state vector of the system.

3.1. Archeometer Basic Measurements

IndicatorMarkingMeaning
IntegrationIConnectivity and the ability of subsystems to share meaningful information
StreamFIntensity of movement of energy, matter, information or resources
StabilitySPerturbation resistance and quality of negative feedback
DiversityVAvailability of alternative states, modules and trajectories
EntropyHUncertainty and distribution of states
CriticismKProximity of dynamics to the boundary of decay and chaos
FragilityRSystem sensitivity to failures and external shocks
Self ModelMThe quality of forecasting your own future state

4. Mathematics of a Single Balance

A single balance does not mean maximizing a single indicator. This is an area of acceptable compromise, where the system simultaneously retains coherence, flow, stability and variability.

B(X) = wI·I + wF·F + wS·S + wV·V − wH·Hₑ − wR·R

Hₑ is the redundant, disorganizing part of entropy; w weights are determined by the task.

For development purposes, it is convenient to use the quality functionality:

Φ(X) = αC − βH − γD + δV + ηS − λR

Here C is coherence, D is conflict between subsystems. Management is formed as a movement along the quality gradient with safety restrictions:

dX/dt = G⁻¹∇Φ(X) − μ∇R(X) + U(t)

G is the metric of the state space; U(t) - external management impact.

5. Criticality Themometer

Criticality shows whether a system is in a zone of attenuation, productive metastability, or chaotic instability. The basic dynamic indicator is the maximum Lyapunov indicator.

λmax = limₜ→∞ (1/t) ln(‖δX(t)‖ / ‖δX(0)‖)

ModeConditionInterpretation
Subcriticalλmax < −εThe system is too rigid; changes fade
Critical|λmax| ≤ εMaximum sensitivity while maintaining controllability
Supercriticalλmax > εIndignation is on the rise; risk of chaos and collapse increases

For a management panel SPECZASHCHITA, criticality must be calculated simultaneously at the local, cluster, and system levels.

6. Structural connectivity and percolation

Structural coherence determines whether a system can exist as a whole. For graph G=(V,E), the largest component size, average degree, clustering, path length, spectral connectivity, and node removal resistance are measured.

SC = (|Cmax|/|V|) · f(⟨k⟩, λ₂(L), Cclust, 1/Lpath)

The key point is the percolation threshold. Below it, there are separate fragments; after it, a giant connected component appears. In system SPECZASHCHITA, this applies to cooperation chains, infrastructure, information channels and network of performers.

7. Cosmorhythmology: Temporary architecture of the system

Cosmoritmology in the engineering version is the discipline of describing, comparing, and using cycles of different scales. It does not automatically assume the causal influence of astronomical cycles on social events; its task is to create a single time coordinate layer in which rhythms, lags, resonances and repeatability are tested.

Cycle classExamplesPractical function
Astronomicalday, year, synodic month, solar cycleTime stamps, seasonality, background conditions
Naturalhydrology, climatic seasonality, biological cyclesMonitoring and resource planning
TechnologicalSO, equipment degradation, software updatesPrevention of failures
Economicproduction, financial, logistics cyclesScenario planning
Socialcalendar, educational, migration rhythmsPlanning of loads and communications
Projectsprint, stage, pilot, control pointExecution recursion and result control

8. Rhythm Mathematics

Any observed periodic component can be represented through a harmonic basis:

r(t) = a₀ + Σₖ [aₖ cos(2πfₖt) + bₖ sin(2πfₖt)]

Spectral density, wavelet analysis, autocorrelation, and cross-correlation are used to search for dominant cycles. For the pair of processes x(t) and y(t), the lag relationship is evaluated:

Cxy(τ) = E[(x(t)−μx)(y(t+τ)−μy)]

Correlation is not considered to be evidence of causation. Causal inferences require effect stability, control of mixing factors, out-of-sample validation, and, where possible, experimental design.

9. Mathematics of Tories and Multicyclical Time

When a system lives in several cycles at the same time, its phase state is conveniently placed on the n-dimensional torus:

Tⁿ = S¹ × S¹ × … × S¹, θ(t) = (θ₁(t), …, θₙ(t))

θₖ(t) = (2πt / Tₖ + φₖ) mod 2π

The theoretical model distinguishes between phase coincidences, quasi-periodic modes, and cycle re-approaching windows. For SPECZASHCHITA, this means being able to calculate not "magic dates", but reproducible multi-periodic windows of observation, maintenance, training, resource mobilization, and risk control.

10. MetaProject recursion

Each Executive Module SPECZASHCHITA must repeat the same minimal logic: input → Measurement → Risk assessment → Objective → Action → check → training. Recursivity makes the system scalable: the same protocol applies to an object, territory, industry, region and network of regions.

Mₗ = {Observe, Measure, Forecast, Act, Validate}ₗ

Level connectivity is built from the bottom up through aggregates and from the top down through constraints, standards and priorities.

11. Architecture SPECZASHCHITA × Archeometer × Cosmoritmology

ContourSign inControllerWithdrawal
Observationsensors, registers, reports, telemetryCleaning and NormalizationVerified data flow
ArcheometerState vector X(t)Calculation B, Φ, λmax, SC, Rdiagnosis and status index
CosmoritmologyTime seriesspectrum, lags, phases, toric coordinateswindows of risk and opportunity
Scenario moduleDiagnosis + cyclesModeling of alternativesSet of scenarios
SPECZASHCHITAScenarios and constraintsselection, coordination, executionEvents and Pilots
ValidationActual resultComparison of forecast/factUpdate the model

12. Archeometer Passport

Passport fieldContents
Module CodeARH-001
PurposeSingle measuring function of the state and development of a complex system
ObjectGraph, infrastructure, project, territory, ecosystem, organizational network
Basic dataTime series, graph data, resource and risk indicators
Main indicesBalance B, Quality Φ, Criticality λmax, SC binding, fragility R
Frequency of calculationBy object type: from current mode to monthly/quarterly
Validation criterionThe forecast should improve the quality of decisions regarding the base model
WithdrawalStatus passport, risk card, connectivity card, recommendations on exposure

13. Passport of the Cosmorhythmic Module

Passport fieldContents
Module CodeKRM-001
PurposeIdentification of stable cycles and phase windows in the observed processes
MethodsFFT/spectral analysis, wavelet, ACF/CCF, phase synchronization, toric coordinates
Minimum of dataSufficient length of the time series relative to the period under study
Status of hypothesesConfirmed / Probabilistic / Research Hypothesis
Error protectionMultiple testing, out-of-sample, alternative models
WithdrawalPhase calendar, cyclic indices, monitoring windows, uncertainty map

14. Applied Scenarios SPECZASHCHITA

Infrastructure stability: Forecast of degradation of objects, seasonal loads, failures and optimal preventive windows.

Environmental monitoring: Synchronization of observations of the atmosphere, water, soil, biocenosis and technogenic load on natural cycles.

Cooperative Chains: Measuring supplier network percolation, identifying single nodes and critical points of failure.

Personnel and resource mobilization: Comparison of project cycles, availability of competencies and critical phases of load.

AI-Ecosystem: Control of criticality, diversity, information integration, and allocation of computing resources.

Crisis management: Transition from calendar response to event state: action is triggered when risk thresholds are reached.

15. Decision protocol

  1. Identify the object and the control horizon.
  2. Create a state vector X(t) and a data quality map.
  3. Calculate balance, coherence, criticality, and fragility.
  4. Identify dominant cycles and time lags.
  5. To form at least three scenarios: basic, unfavorable, target.
  6. Check security constraints and resource feasibility.
  7. Run the minimum reversible effect.
  8. Compare the forecast with the fact and update the model parameters.

16. Validation and scientific integrity

The system is considered to work not on the beauty of formulas, but on the ability to steadily improve solutions. Therefore, each module should have a basic comparison model and a measurable win criterion.

CriterionMinimum requirement
Predictive accuracybetter naive/seasonal baseline on an independent period
Resiliencethe result is saved with a reasonable change in parameters
ExplanatoryUnderstand the main factors and the range of uncertainty
Reproducibilitythe calculation is repeated from the same input data and version of the algorithm
SecurityCritical decisions are not made on one index only.
CausalityCorrelation signals are separated from proven causal relationships

17. Road map of implementation

StageTimeframeResult
0. Formalization0–2 monthssingle dictionary of indicators, 20–40 metrics, data scheme
1. MVP Archeometer2–5 monthscalculation B, λmax, SC, R at 1 pilot facility
2. Cosmoritmology4–7 monthstime series, cycles, phases and lags module
3. Single panel6–9 monthsDiagnostic and Scenario Panel SPECZASHCHITA
4. Field Pilot9–15 monthsverification on the real object and control group
5. Standard12–18 monthsRegulation of data, algorithms, validation and audit
6. Scaling18+ monthsreplication by territories and industries

18. Minimum data model

EntityKey fields
Objectobject_id, type, location_level, owner, criticality_class
Metricmetric_id, unit, normalization, source, quality_score
Observationobject_id, metric_id, timestamp, value, uncertainty
Relationsource_id, target_id, relation_type, weight, validity
Cyclecycle_id, period, phase, confidence, domain
Riskrisk_id, probability, impact, horizon, evidence
Actionaction_id, trigger, resource, expected_effect, reversibility
Validationprediction_id, observed_effect, error, verdict

19. The Ten Principles of the System

  1. Measurability is higher than declaration.
  2. Dynamics is more important than static rating.
  3. Balance is not equal to peace: a viable system maintains a controlled flow.
  4. Criticality is useful only with working restrictions and feedback.
  5. Connectivity must grow without becoming monoculture.
  6. Cycles are used as verifiable temporal structures, not as automatic causal explanations.
  7. Any hypothesis has a status and level of trust.
  8. Any impact should have a criterion of termination and reversibility.
  9. Prediction without validation does not become knowledge.
  10. SPECZASHCHITA is responsible for turning the model into a measurable result.

20. Final formula

In a single architecture, the Archeometer answers the question "in what state the system is and where it is going", Cosmoritmology - "in what phase and time context it is", and SPECZASHCHITA - "what exactly needs to be done, by whom, when and with what verifiable result".

RESULT = DATA × RELATIONSHIP × TIME × BALANCE × EXECUTION

The fundamental task is not to keep the system in a fixed equilibrium, but to keep it within a range of sustainable development: sufficiently coherent for cooperation, sufficiently diverse for adaptation, sufficiently critical for sensitivity and sufficiently stable to prevent destruction.

Annex A. Short dictionary

TermWorking definition
Archeometermultidimensional system measurement and harmonization operator
Cosmoritmologyanalysis and joint description of cycles of different time scales
Single BalanceThe field of sustainable compromise between connectivity, flow, stability and diversity
Criticismproximity of the system to the boundary between attenuation and instability
Percolationthe emergence of a globally connected component after passing the threshold of connectivity
Attractorthe area of phase space to which the dynamics of the system gravitates
RecursionRepeating one control cycle at different levels of the system
The Toric Modelrepresentation of several independent cyclic phases at Tⁿ

Other published edition: ARCHEOMETERS AND COSMORITMOLOGIES SPECZASCHITA_Archeometr_Kosmoritmologiya_repeat.pptx · Web Text +

Architecture of measurement, synchronization and harmonization of multidimensional systems

MEASURE

SYNCHRONIZED

FORECAST

HARMONIZATE

ACTING

Conceptual and technical presentation

1. System summary

From observation to verifiable result

Observation

Archeometer

Cosmoritm

Decision

Implementation

Feedback

Archeometer

Cosmoritmology

SPECZASHCHITA

Translates heterogeneous data into a single state space, evaluates balance, criticality, connectivity, and fragility.

It forms a time-cycle layer: phases, lags, repeatability, observation and decision-making windows.

Executive outline: scripts, resources, pilots, actual effect control, and model training.

2. Methodological status

Separation of fact, model and hypothesis

A. Measured cycles

B. Mathematical models

C. Testable Hypotheses

Earth's rotation, annual and lunar cycles, solar activity, seasonal loads and other observed periodicities.

Status: empirically measurable data.

Dynamical systems, graph theory, spectral analysis, entropy, percolation, Lyapunov indicators, attractors.

Status: Formalized models.

Correlation of cycles with social, technological, or cognitive phenomena.

Status: hypothesis before statistical and causal validation.

Principle of scientific integrity: correlation ≠ Causality

3. Archeometer

Universal Development Function and Harmonization Operator

X(t) = [x₁(t), x₂(t), …, xₙ(t)]ᵀ

What's going on?

Normalized state vector of a multidimensional system

What impact will improve the balance?

How sustainable?

Archeometer

Where is the critical threshold?

Where's it going?

4. Mathematics of a Single Balance

Balance is not peace, but the range of sustainable development

B(X) = wᵢI + wᶠF + wˢS + wᵛV − wʰHₑ − wʳR

Connection • flow • stability • variety • controlled entropy • risk

Φ(X) = αC − βH − γD + δV + ηS − λR

Status Quality Functionality

dX/dt = G⁻¹∇Φ(X) − μ∇R(X) + U(t)

Control = movement towards quality under risk constraints

5. Criticality Themometer

Local → cluster → system level

λmax = limₜ→∞ (1/t) ln(‖δX(t)‖ / ‖δX(0)‖)

Maximum Lyapunov indicator

Attenuation

Rigidity

Lack of adaptability

Productive

Metastability

High sensitivity

Instability

Trajectories

Increased risk

The goal of management is not to “maximize criticality”, but to keep the system in the acceptable operating range.

6. Structural connectivity and percolation

When a set of elements becomes a system

SC = (|Cmax|/|V|) · f(⟨k⟩, λ₂(L), Cclust, 1/Lpath)

Connectivity = size of global component × Topology Quality

  • Below the percolation threshold, the network is fragmented.
  • After the threshold, a giant connected component appears.
  • Excessive connectivity increases the risk of monoculture and cascading failures.
  • SPECZASHCHITA measures the network's resistance to node removal and chain breakage.

7. Cosmoritmology

Single time coordinate layer

Day

The Lunar Cycle

Year

Solar activity

Technological cycles

24 h

≈29,53 days

≈365,24 days

≈11 years

object/industry

What we measure

What we predict

What we don't do

Frequency, phase, amplitude, lag, rhythm stability, regime change.

Windows of observation, maintenance, training, resource mobilization and risk control.

We do not declare social correlations to be causal laws without validation.

8–9. Mathematics of Rhythms and Tories

From spectrum to multicyclic phase state

r(t) = a₀ + Σₖ[aₖ cos(2πfₖt) + bₖ sin(2πfₖt)]

Harmonic basis for periodic components

Cxy(τ) = E[(x(t)−μx)(y(t+τ)−μy)]

Lag cross-correlation

Tⁿ = S¹ × … × S¹, θₖ(t) = (2πt/Tₖ + φₖ) mod 2π

The Toric Model of Multicyclic Time

10. MetaProject recursion

The same minimum logic on each scale

Observation

Measurement

Forecast

Action

Validation

Mₗ = {Observe, Measure, Forecast, Act, Validate}ₗ

Object

Territory / Industry

Network of regions

Local system: equipment, site, organization.

Aggregation of indicators from the bottom up; standards and restrictions from the top down.

The same protocol is applied without changing the basic logic.

11. Integrated architecture

SPECZASHCHITA × Archeometer × Cosmoritmology

DATA

Archeometer

COSMORITM

sensors • registers • reports • observations

balance • criticality • binding • risk

Phase • Cycles • Lagi • Window Solutions

SCENARIA

EXECUTION

VALIDATION

Basic • Unfavorable •

pilot • resource • responsible • term

fact vs forecast • model update

12. Applied Scenarios SPECZASHCHITA

One Mathematics - Different Objects of Control

Infrastructure

Ecology

Cooperation

degradation • failures • preventative windows

Atmosphere • Water • Soil • Biocenosis • Load

Percolation of suppliers • Single Nodes • Refusal Points

Staffing and resources

AI-ecosystem

Crisis management

load cycles • competence • mobilization

criticality • variety • computing resources

action on the state and threshold of risk, not only on the calendar

13. Decision protocol

Eight steps from object to system training

Identify the object and the control horizon.

Create an X(t) and a data quality map.

Calculate balance, coherence, criticality, and fragility.

Identify dominant cycles and time lags.

Form 3 scenarios: basic, unfavorable, target.

Check security constraints and resource feasibility.

Run the minimum reversible effect.

Compare the forecast with the fact and update the model parameters.

14. Validation and road map

What works is what steadily improves solutions

Validation

Scientific integrity

Security

Basic comparison model • out-of-sample test • control of mixing factors • criterion win • error log.

Each hypothesis has a status, level of trust, and revision conditions. Prediction without verification does not become knowledge.

Any impact should have a trigger threshold, termination criterion, reversibility and responsible.

0–3 months

3–6 months

6–12 months

12–24 months

24+ months

Data Model

MVP Archeometer

Cycles and validation

Pilots SPECZASHCHITA

Scaling

15. The Ten Principles of the System

Criteria for engineering maturity

Measurability above declaration

Cycles — time structures to be tested

Dynamics is more important than static rating

Hypotheses have a status of trust

Balance ≠ Tranquility

Effects are reversible and limited

Criticism requires limitations

The forecast must be validated

Connectivity without monoculture

SPECZASHCHITA turns the model into a result

RESULT = DATA × RELATIONSHIP × TIME × BALANCE × EXECUTION

FINAL FORMULA

The archeometer answers, "In what state is the system and where is it going?"

Cosmoritmology answers, “In what phase and time context is it?”

SPECZASHCHITA answers: "What to do, by whom, when and with what verifiable result?"

The goal is sustainable development: sufficiently coherent for cooperation, sufficiently diverse for adaptation, sufficiently critical for sensitivity and sufficiently stable to prevent destruction.

Published files

Science · Full published text

IMASH RAS: Strategic Concept for 2026–2035

Source Status: Primary Document

A strategic concept for developing the scientific and engineering system of IMASH RAS for 2026–2035.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/imash-ran-strategicheskaya-kontseptsiya

Open on the site

"Mechanical science as the core of engineering science, validation and system development"

The key idea of IMASH RAS can become not only a research institute in the traditional sense, but a national system center of engineering reliability: from fundamental mechanics and machine learning to digital twins, tests, standards, robotics, new materials and inter-industry technological platforms.

Moscow · 2026

01 / STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK

Summary of the concept

The new role of IMASH RAS is to combine fundamental mechanics, engineering science, computational modeling, experiment, standardization and industrial implementation into a single verifiable chain of technologies.

Russia’s strategic thesis needs an engineering institute that answers not only the question “Can it be calculated?”, but also the questions “Does it work in the real system?”, “What are the resources?”, “What are the risks?”, “What standards are needed?”, “How to scale the solution between industries?”. IMASH RAN naturally fits the role of such an integrator.

Objective 2035

  • To form on the basis of IMAS RAS a national scientific and engineering center of a full cycle: a model → experiment → Validation → Digital Double → Standard → Experienced sample → Industrial Cooperation.
  • Make machine science a horizontal science for transportation, energy, industry, robotics, construction, nature-like systems, space, and infrastructure.
  • Create a single digital contour of engineering models, data, tests, materials, failures, resources and technological solutions.
  • Ensure continuity of scientific schools and at the same time move to a project model of large interdisciplinary programs.

Proposed status at SUR

SUR in this concept is understood as a development management system. In it, IMASH RAS acts as an engineering and scientific validator - an independent center that connects fundamental science, industry tasks, data, standards, technologies and the life cycle of machines.

ContourRoleResult
1ScienceFundamental laws of mechanics, machines, waves, friction, destruction, dynamics, reliability.
2CalculatingMultiphysical models, digital twins, metacomputing, engineering AI.
3ValidationTesting, metrology, model verification, resource, safety, technological readiness.
4IntegrationInter-industry cooperation, pilots, standards, industrial transfer and replication.

02 / IDENTITY AND MISSION

IMASH RAS as a National School of Mechanical Engineering

The machine is no longer just a machine. These are the cyber-physical system, material, software management, sensorics, energy, human-environment interaction, state data, and the full life cycle model.

Mission

To create fundamental knowledge and engineering methods that allow you to design, test and operate complex technical systems with proven reliability, efficiency and safety throughout the life cycle.

Five principles of the new model

01EvidenceAny technology goes through a chain of models, experiments, reproducibility and measurable criteria.
02Life CycleDesign takes into account the manufacture, operation, repair, modernization, recycling and reuse.
03ConnectivityMechanics are considered together with materials, control, energy, data and the environment.
04Open cooperationThe Institute becomes a hub for academic institutions, universities, KB, state corporations, industries and regions.
05ContinuityScientific schools and heritage archives are being translated into a living digital system of knowledge and learning.

03 / DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTURE

12 Strategic Programs

Instead of a fragmented set of projects, a portfolio of large programs is offered, each with a fundamental core, an experimental base, a digital contour, and industrial partners.

CodeProgrammeFocus
P1Mechanics of new generation machinesDynamics, nonlinearity, stability, oscillations, wave processes, high-speed and limit modes.
P2Reliability, resource and destructionForecast of residual resource, damage, fatigue, diagnostics, fault tolerance.
P3Tribology and Contact SystemsFriction, wear, lubrication, coatings, interfaces, tribodiagnosis.
P4New Materials and Surface EngineeringMultiscale models of materials, composites, ceramics, high-purity materials, functional coatings.
P5Digital twins and engineering AIMulti-model digital twins, parameter identification, machine learning with physical limitations.
P6Robotics and Autonomous MachinesGround, air, underwater and industrial robotic complexes.
P7Nonlinear Wave Mechanics and TechnologyWave processes as the basis of diagnostics, material processing, environmental management and new production technologies.
P8Transport systems 2035–2050High-speed systems, mechatronics, rolling stock, unmanned transport, infrastructure mechanics.
P9Energy Machines and New EnergyTurbomachines, rotary dynamics, drives, hydrogen and hybrid solutions, energy efficiency.
P10Engineering of natural and biocenous systemsMachines for monitoring, restoring water, soil, atmosphere, ecosystems; nature-like technologies.
P11Extreme Environments, Arctic and SpaceMechanics at temperatures, vacuum, radiation, vibrations; ultra-reliable technical systems.
P12Standards, validation and technological sovereigntyTest methods, benchmarks, model registries, independent assessment of technology readiness and reproducibility.

04 / DIGITAL PLATE

IMASH.Digital — engineering NEUROSVOD

The digital transformation of the institute should not be built around document flow, but around machine-readable knowledge: models, experiments, parameters, materials, configurations, failure events and evidence of validity.

LayerNamePurpose
L1Register of objectsMachines, assemblies, materials, stands, methods, sensors, software models.
L2Knowledge GraphConnections "requirement → model → experiment → result → solution → standard".
L3Digital twinsConfigurationally managed models of real products and infrastructures.
L4GRID / HPC / metacomputingDistributed computing, multiscale problems, ensemble models.
L5Engineering AISearch for patterns, surrogate models, diagnostics, optimization, assistant researcher.
L6The Contour of TrustVerification, data origin, reproducibility, signatures, validation protocols.
L7Federal exchangeIntegration with academic institutions, universities and industrial circuits without loss of data sovereignty.

Passport of digital double IMASH

  • object identifier and configuration; physical and functional structure;
  • a set of models of different levels of accuracy; experimental data and applicability limits;
  • parameters of materials, loads and environment; history of changes and repairs;
  • Verification/validation criteria; uncertainties and confidence intervals;
  • resource prediction, failure scenarios and operating recommendations.

05 / ENGINEERING CERTIFICATE CENTER

Validation as a new institutional function

The proposal to create on the basis of IMASS RAS Center of engineering reliability is an independent scientific platform for checking calculations, models, tests and technological statements for complex and critical systems.

What is Validated

ObjectCriterion
Modelscompliance with physics, grid/numerical convergence, sensitivity, uncertainty.
Experimentsmethods, metrology, repeatability, traceability of data.
Materialspassports of properties, variability of batches, degradation, operating conditions.
Productsresource, reliability, limit states, fail-safe.
AI-modelfield of applicability, stability, explicability, physical limitations.
TechnologyTRL/MRL, scalability readiness, critical dependencies and risks.

Methodological compatibility

The outline can be compatible with the internationally recognized principles of laboratory competence, verification/validation, data origin management and responsible AI, while maintaining the Russian methods, regulatory framework and requirements of technological sovereignty.

06 / SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIAL COOPERATION

From the Institute to the Network of Engineering Consortiums

Complex machines are not created by one organization. Therefore, the key organizational unit should not be a one-time contract, but a stable consortium around the technological task.

ConsortiumGeneral subject
TransportRussian Railways, transport engineering, automotive industry, unmanned systems, infrastructure.
Energygeneration, turbomachinery, oil and gas, nuclear power, distributed energy.
Roboticsindustrial, service, underwater, inspection and autonomous complexes.
New materialsmetallurgy, ceramics, composites, coatings, additive technologies.
Construction and Housingmachines, monitoring of structures, resource engineering infrastructure, robotization.
Ecology and natural systemsmonitoring and restoration of water, soil, air; mechanization of the full cycle.
Space and the Arcticmechanisms for extreme environments, autonomy, durability, maintainability.

Industry Entry Mechanism

  1. Formulation of a measurable technological problem and a baseline.
  2. Gathering an interdisciplinary team and matrix of competencies.
  3. Create a set of models and a pilot program.
  4. Verification/validation and techno-economic evaluation.
  5. Pilot or pilot on a real site.
  6. Standard, methodology, digital passport and scaling package.

07 / HERITAGE AND SCIENTIFIC SCHOOLS

Archive for the preservation of engineering heritage

Scientific heritage becomes an asset only when it can be found, compared, reproduced and incorporated into new research.

The project "Live Archive of IMASH" Digitize and semantically link the works of scientific schools, reports, drawings, photographs, experimental journals, stands, methods, dissertations, patents and software models with the modern tasks of the Institute.

Structure of the Fund

  • Personal and personal funds of outstanding scientists and designers;
  • archive of laboratories and scientific schools;
  • register of experimental stands and unique installations;
  • library of engineering models and test tasks;
  • catalogue of failures, accidents and engineering lessons;
  • oral history - interviews with leading specialists and veterans of the Institute;
  • Digital exhibition "History of Mechanical Engineering of Russia".

Principle

Each archival object receives a digital passport: authorship, date, topic, object of equipment, method, results, links with modern research, rights of use and level of reliability.

08 / CARDS AND EDUCATION

IMASH Engineering School

Personnel strategy should form a new type of researcher: he understands physics, can count, experiment, work with data and bring the result to an engineering solution.

TrackPairingContents
School 1Mechanics + MathematicsFundamental mechanics, nonlinear dynamics, stability theory, waves.
School 2Mechanics + calculationsCAE, HPC, UQ, digital twins, data assimilation.
School 3Mechanics + experimentStands, measurements, diagnostics, metrology, signal processing.
School 4Mechanics + materialsMicrostructure, strength, tribology, surfaces, technological processes.
School 5Mechanics + RoboticsMechatronics, control, sensors, autonomy.
School 6Mechanics + implementationTechnological readiness, life cycle economics, standards, patents, cooperation.

Formats

  • joint magistracy and basic departments;
  • Post-graduate schools around large programs;
  • engineering competitions on real data and stands;
  • rotations between laboratories, KB and industrial sites;
  • Program "100 young researchers IMASH";
  • mentorship of scientific schools and grants for risky fundamental ideas.

09 / INFRASTRUCTURE

From individual stands to experiment factory

The infrastructure should be managed as a single research complex with digital reservations, accuracy passports, calibration history and linking each experiment to a model and research task.

I1 Center for Dynamics and VibroacousticsI2 Strength, Resource and Destruction CenterI3 Center for Tribology and Surface EngineeringI4 Center for Nonlinear Wave Mechanics
I5
Robotics and Autonomous Systems Center
I6
Digital Twin Center and HPC
I7
Center for Materials and Extreme Conditions
I8
Center for Metrology and Engineering Validation

Principle CAPEX

The new installation is purchased only together with a digital passport, methodology, download program, a set of control tasks and an interlaboratory use plan. This translates the infrastructure from “balance sheet equipment” to a measurable scientific asset.

10 / ECONOMY AND FUNDS

Funding system for full-cycle studies

Sustainability of the institute requires a portfolio of sources: basic science is funded as a long-term foundation, and application programs through consortia, grants, customers and specialized funds.

FundPurpose
Foundation for Fundamental Engineeringlong horizons, scientific schools, risky ideas;
Foundation of Youth Laboratoriesstarting packages for young managers;
Unique Installations Fundmodernization of stands, metrology, service;
Digital Models Foundationdevelopment and maintenance of trusted engineering models;
Technology Pilots Fundproduction of prototypes and testing by the customer;
Heritage Foundationarchive, museum, publication of scientific schools, digitization;
Transfer Fundpatenting, licensing, spin-offs, international and interregional cooperation.
The principle of evaluation Financing is tied not only to publications, but to the portfolio of results: new knowledge, experimental base, confirmed model, engineering methodology, patent, standard, trained personnel, pilot and implementation.

11 / SUR: DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Place IMASH RAS in contour SUR

SUR should be used as a project-based mechanism that links the request of the state and industries with scientific competences, resources, data and measurable results.

StageContents
1. SignalStrategic task, deficit, technological dependence, accident rate, new opportunity.
2. DecompositionPhysical processes, critical nodes, data, materials, standards, economics.
3. Scientific modelFundamental hypothesis, calculation model, scenarios and uncertainties.
4. ExperimentStand and field tests, measurements, comparison with the model.
5. DecisionDesign, material, algorithm, technique or technology.
6. ValidationProof of operability, resource and limits of applicability.
7. ScalingStandard, digital passport, production cooperation, replication.

The Balances That I See

  • balance of mass, energy and momentum;
  • balance of resource and reliability;
  • balancing productivity and energy efficiency;
  • Life cycle cost balance;
  • balance of technological independence and external dependencies;
  • balance of human competencies and engineering tasks;
  • balance of the technosphere and the natural environment.

12 / PILOT

10 Quick Start Projects

To move from concept to action, pilots are needed who simultaneously demonstrate scientific depth, digital connectivity, and practical results.

№PilotResult
01Digital Double Critical NodeFull cycle: data → model → stand → resource forecast.
02The Russian Machine Failure RegisterTypology of failures and engineering lessons with impersonal data of industries.
03Reference set of V&V tasksA set of test mechanical tasks for checking domestic software and AI.
04Robot Infrastructure InspectorDiagnostics of structures, pipelines or industrial equipment.
05Wave technology diagnosticsNonlinear methods of early detection of damage.
06Material with digital passportConnection composition -structure -property -resource -exploitation conditions.
07Machines for biocenous monitoringModular robotic systems for water, soil and air.
08Open experiment factoryA single digital catalog of stands and test orders.
09The Bladonravov Living ArchiveDigital collection of the scientific school and its connections with modern tasks.
10Engineering Readiness IndexA method of assessing the readiness of complex technology for implementation and scaling.

13 / MANAGEMENT

Project model of the Institute

Maintaining strong labs is compatible with the matrix system of large programs. The laboratory maintains the school and competencies; the program assembles an interdisciplinary team around the result.

OrganFunction
Scientific CouncilFundamental agenda, quality of science, scientific schools.
Strategic CouncilProgram portfolio, partnerships, infrastructure priorities.
Program OfficePlanning, budgets, risks, milestones, interlaboratory coordination.
Validation BoardIndependent assessment of models, experiments, methods and readiness.
the Council of Young ScientistsPersonnel trajectories, youth laboratories, scientific entrepreneurship.
The Industrial CouncilFormation of tasks, pilots and implementation contours with customers.

Control unit

Passport Strategic Program Objective → scientific hypothesis → System of indicators → Model → experiment → Infrastructure → Partners → Risks → Right to results → Stages TRL/MRL → effect → decision on continuation/scaling.

14 / INDICATORS

IMASH Engineering Strength Index

Indicators should not describe activity, but the ability of the institute to turn knowledge into a testable engineering opportunity.

MeasurementExample KPI
Scientific depththe share of works with new fundamental results; the quality of scientific schools; citation in specialized areas.
CredibilityNumber of validated models/methods; reproducibility of results; interlaboratory comparisons.
Digital maturityThe share of projects with digital passports, provenance data and managed versions of models.
Infrastructuredownload rate of unique installations; access time; number of external users.
Workforceyoung executives, graduate students, interdisciplinary trajectories, talent retention.
Transferpilots, licenses, standards, implementation, economic effect of partners.
Sovereigntyreduction of critical technological dependencies in selected areas.
Heritageshare of digitized funds and re-use of archival results in new projects.

15 / ROAD CARD

2026–2035: four horizons

PeriodHorizonMain results
2026–2027Kernel AssemblyAudit of competences and stands; 12 Programmes; 10 pilots; digital registry; engineering reliability center project; live archive launch.
2028–2030IntegrationFederated platform with partners; collaborative labs; scaling of digital twins; new standards and test techniques.
2031–2033The National NetworkA network of distributed machine learning centers; industry engineering knowledge graphs; participation in major national programs.
2034–2035World levelExport of engineering techniques and scientific schools; international reference tasks; recognized center of validation of complex technical systems.

First 100 days

  1. Approve the working group of strategy and owners of 12 programs.
  2. To carry out an inventory of competencies, stands, program codes, data, patents and partnerships.
  3. Select 3–5 first-year pilots with a measurable end result.
  4. Create a minimum register of engineering objects and digital passports.
  5. Prepare a regulation on the Engineering Reliability Center.
  6. Form an industrial council and hold a policy session with key industries.
  7. To launch the project "Living Archive of IMASH" and digitization of priority funds.
  8. Collect a budget of 2027–2030 for programs, infrastructure and personnel.

16 / TARGET

IMASH RAS 2035

The institute, which knows the physics of machines, knows how to calculate it, test it by experiment, fix it in the standard and bring it to working technology.

Formula IMASH RAS = the Scientific School + Experimental infrastructure + Computational Circuit + Validation Center + Engineering Archive + a Consortium Network.

What it gives Russia

  • reduction of engineering risks and the number of expensive errors at the implementation stage;
  • accelerating the transition from fundamental result to industrial technology;
  • independent verification of critical technical solutions;
  • preservation and development of domestic scientific schools of engineering;
  • creation of a library of trusted models and data for domestic engineering software and AI;
  • cross-industry transfer of solutions and higher returns from research infrastructure;
  • training a generation of researchers capable of working at the intersection of physics, computation, experiment and production.

Machine science is the science of how to turn the laws of nature into reliable systems of action.

Status of the document: a conceptual project for discussion and subsequent details with the management and scientific departments of IMASH RAS.

Other published edition: IMASH RAS STRATEGIC CONCEPT OF DEVELOPMENT 2026–2035 Machine science as the core of engineering science, validation and system development Institute of Machine Science. A. A. Bladonravova RAS IMASH_RAN_Strategic_concept_2026-2035.pptx · web text +

01 / STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK

New role of IMASH RAS

• National System Center for Engineering Reliability.

• Connection: fundamental mechanics → Calculator → experiment → Validation → Standard → implementation.

• Horizontal engineering science for transport, energy, industry, robotics, construction, ecology, Arctic and space.

• Digital contour of models, data, testing, materials, failures and life cycle.

02 / ARCHITECTURE

The four contours of the institute

SCIENCE

CALCULATION

VALIDATION

INTEGRATION

Fundamental laws of mechanics, waves, friction, destruction, dynamics and reliability.

Multiphysical models, digital twins, HPC, Metacomputing and Engineering AI.

Testing, metrology, model verification, resource, safety and technological readiness.

Consortiums, pilots, standards, industrial transfer and replication.

03 / PORTFOLIO

12 Strategic Programs

Mechanics of new generation machines

Reliability, resource and destruction

Tribology and Contact Systems

New materials and surfaces

Digital twins and engineering AI

Robotics and Autonomous Machines

Nonlinear Wave Mechanics

Transport systems 2035–2050

Energy Machines and New Energy

Engineering of natural systems

Extreme Environments, Arctic and Space

Standards, validation and sovereignty

P10

P11

P12

04 / DIGITAL PLATE

IMASH.Digital — engineering NEUROSVOD

L1 Register of objects

L2 Knowledge Graph

L3 Digital twins

L4 GRID / HPC

L5 Engineering AI

L6 Contour of trust

L7 Federal Exchange

05 / VALIDATION

Center for Engineering Reliability

What we check

What we prove

What the country gets

Calculation models Experiments Materials Products AI-models Technology

Physical Correctness Repeatability Data Traceability Resource and Reliability Limits of applicability Scalability Readiness

Independent Engineering Expertise Reducing Costly Errors Trusted Models Reference Tasks Standards and Techniques Technological Sovereignty

06 / CONSORTIUM

Scientific and industrial cooperation

Ecology and natural systems

Space and the Arctic

Construction and Housing

IMASH RAS integrator

Transport

New materials

Energy

Robotics

07 / HERITAGE

IMASH Live Archive

• Personal and personal funds of outstanding scientists and designers.

• Archive of laboratories, scientific schools, stands and unique installations.

• Library of Engineering Models, Test Tasks, Failures and Engineering Lessons.

• Digital passport of each object: authorship, theme, method, results, connections, rights and level of authenticity.

• The archive becomes not a repository, but an active resource of research, training and engineering AI.

08 / CADRS

IMASH Engineering School

Mechanics + Mathematics

Mechanics + calculations

Mechanics + experiment

Formation of a researcher capable of going from a physical hypothesis to an engineering solution.

Formation of a researcher capable of going from a physical hypothesis to an engineering solution.

Formation of a researcher capable of going from a physical hypothesis to an engineering solution.

Mechanics + materials

Mechanics + Robotics

Mechanics + implementation

Formation of a researcher capable of going from a physical hypothesis to an engineering solution.

Formation of a researcher capable of going from a physical hypothesis to an engineering solution.

Formation of a researcher capable of going from a physical hypothesis to an engineering solution.

09 / EXPERIMENT

Full cycle infrastructure

Dynamics and vibroacoustics

Strength, resource and destruction

Tribology and surface

Nonlinear Wave Mechanics

A single digital passport, loading, calibration, methods and the relationship of the experiment with the model.

A single digital passport, loading, calibration, methods and the relationship of the experiment with the model.

A single digital passport, loading, calibration, methods and the relationship of the experiment with the model.

A single digital passport, loading, calibration, methods and the relationship of the experiment with the model.

Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Digital twins and HPC

Materials and extreme conditions

Metrology and engineering validation

A single digital passport, loading, calibration, methods and the relationship of the experiment with the model.

A single digital passport, loading, calibration, methods and the relationship of the experiment with the model.

A single digital passport, loading, calibration, methods and the relationship of the experiment with the model.

A single digital passport, loading, calibration, methods and the relationship of the experiment with the model.

10 / SUR

SUR: place of IMASH in the development management system

Signal

Decomposition

Scientific model

Experiment

Decision

Validation

Scaling

IMASH RAS is an engineering and scientific validator SUR: connects the state and industry request with the physics, data, experiment, standard and life cycle of machines.

11 / PILOT

10 Quick Start Projects

Digital Double Critical Node

The Russian Machine Failure Register

Reference set of V&V tasks

Robot Infrastructure Inspector

Wave technology diagnostics

Material with digital passport

Machines for biocenous monitoring

Open experiment factory

The Bladonravov Living Archive

Engineering Readiness Index

12 / MANAGEMENT

Project model of the Institute

Scientific Council

Strategic Council

Program Office

Fundamental Agenda and Quality of Science

Portfolio of programs and partnerships

Budgets, risks, milestones, coordination

Validation Board

the Council of Young Scientists

The Industrial Council

Independent evaluation of models and methodologies

Personnel trajectories and youth laboratories

Tasks, pilots and implementation with customers

13 / INDICATORS

IMASH Engineering Strength Index

Sovereignty

Transfer

Heritage

ENGINEERING POWER

Workforce

Scientific depth

Infrastructure

Credibility

Digital maturity

14 / HORIZONS

Road map 2026–2035

Audit of competences and stands · 12 Programmes · 10 Pilots · Digital Registry · Live Archive

Kernel Assembly

2026–2027

Federal Platform · Joint Laboratories · Digital Twins · New Standards

Integration

2028–2030

Distributed centers of machine science · branch graphs of knowledge · large national programs

The National Network

2031–2033

Export of engineering techniques · International Reference Tasks · a Recognized Validation Center

World level

2034–2035

IMASH RAS 2035 FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE × ENGINEERING Credibility × DIGITAL DOUBLE × INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT OF IMASH RAN = the Scientific School + Experimental infrastructure + Computational Circuit + the Validation Center + Engineering Archive + network of consortia. Machine science is the science of how to turn the laws of nature into reliable systems of action.

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

The Kybalion in the SPECZASHCHITA System

Source Status: Primary Document

An interpretation of the principles of the Kybalion in the context of SPECZASHCHITA’s programmes and system model.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/kibalion-speczashchita

Open on the site

SPECZASHCHITA • EQUILIBRIUM • SFERA • ECO-PPA

2026

0. Methodological reservation

Kibalion is considered in this document as a philosophical and hermetic system of images and principles. Its provisions do not replace scientific theories, regulatory requirements, engineering calculations and evidence-based methods. In SPECZASHCHITA, the seven principles are used as a language for asking questions, designing feedback, and verifying system integrity; all operating solutions must have measurable metrics, data sources, and validation procedures.

1. Executive summary

SPECZASHCHITA is proposed to be interpreted as a cooperative organization of execution, in which the philosophical framework of Kibalion is translated into engineering contours: observation, measurement, forecasting, balancing, coordination, execution and feedback. The key idea is not to “rule the world with principles,” but to use principles to keep integrity while scaling a complex system.

Philosophical principle -> system question -> measurable metric -> management action -> verifiable result

  • EQUILIBRIUM - observation, modeling, forecasting and integrated assessment layer.
  • SFERA - space of initiatives, participants, projects, data and communications.
  • ECO-PPA - a mechanism for linking resources, commitments, indicators and measurable effects.
  • SPECZASHCHITA - contour of cooperation and execution: consortia, pilots, production, scaling.
  • Archeometer - Harmonisation operator: measures deviations, coherence, criticality and dynamic balance.

2. The Seven Principles of Cybalion in the Language SPECZASHCHITA

PrincipleSystem InterpretationMetrics/ModelApplication
MentalismEvery program starts with a model of the world, goals and quality criteria.Goal map; state model X(t); goal function J.Strategy, scenario modeling, digital twin.
ConformitySimilar laws of the organization can be repeated on different scales, but require verification.Multilevel model; graphs; recursive modules.Node -> cluster -> region -> system.
VibrationThe system is always in dynamics; frequencies, rhythms, and vibrations are important.Spectra, autocorrelation, Fourier/wavelet, lambdamax.Monitoring, criticality, early warning.
PolarityMany management regimes form a continuum of opposites.Order<->chaos; centralization<->autonomy; risk<->Sustainability.Set up allowable ranges, not extremes.
RhythmProcesses have cycles and lags; the solution must take into account the phase of the process.Periods T, phase coordinates of theta, cyclic indices.Cosmoritmology as a calendar-cyclical analyst.
Cause and effectEach intervention should have a traceable chain of causes and effects.DAG, causal graphs, counterfactual analysis.Impact assessment ECO-PPA, audit of decisions.
Gender/generationIn the engineering reading, the complementarity of generation and selection, initiatives and forms.Exploration<->exploitation; generator<->validator.Innovation cycle, R&D, portfolio of projects.

3. The Mentalism Principle: A Model Before Action

For SPECZASHCHITA, the principle of mentalism is translated into a requirement: before launching an action, there must be a formalized model of the object, environment, threats, resources, limitations, and the expected result. A solution without a model is considered a hypothesis, not a management norm.

X(t+1) = F(X(t), U(t), E(t))

Here X is the state of the object, U is the management impact, E is the external environment. Function F must be at least partially identified by data or expert model and have a refinement mechanism after each cycle.

4. Principle of Conformity: Recursion and Scale

SPECZASHCHITA is built on recursive logic: a local module must have a minimum sufficient set of functions of the entire system - to observe, evaluate, act and report the result. When scaling, parameters and powers change, but the cycle structure is preserved.

Modull = - Monitoring, evaluation, solution, execution, feedback - x scalel

  • The object/point of monitoring is the local level.
  • Project/territory - cluster level.
  • Industry/region - inter-system level.
  • National/international contour - level of coordination.

5. The Principle of Vibration: Dynamics, Criticality, and Temometer

In engineering interpretation, “vibration” means that the state of a complex system cannot be estimated from a single static photograph. It is necessary to measure the rate of change, spectral components, stability and distance to critical mode.

T(crit) = w1*I + w2*C + w3*R − w4*|lambdamax| − w5*Ecost

The criticality thermometer is not a physical thermometer. It is an integral index that combines connectivity I, coherence C, stability R, maximum Lyapunov lambdamax and resource price Ecost. All components are normalized for a specific class of objects.

6. Principle of Polarity: Range Management

Polarity is not used as a statement of “two forces”, but as a method of finding a controlled range between extremes. For each object, a lower threshold, a working corridor and an upper threshold are specified.

x_min < x_work < x_max

PolarityRisk of Lower ExtremesThe risk of upper extreme
Autonomy <-> coordinationFragmentationHypercentralization
Variety <-> standardizationIncompatibilityMonoculture
Stability <-> adaptabilityStagnationTurbulence
Openness <-> protectionVulnerabilityIsolation

7. The Rhythm Principle: Cosmoritmology as Cyclic Analytics

Cosmorhythmology in the applied version SPECZASHCHITA is a discipline of analysis of the cycles of natural, technological, social and astronomical processes. Astronomical parameters can be used as external time series where there is a verifiable physical relationship; symbolic correspondences must be labeled separately and not mixed with causal models.

x(t) = mu(t) + sum Ak cos(2pit/Tk + φk) + eps(t)

  • Seasonality and Climate Cycles.
  • Solar activity and confirmed geophysical effects.
  • Technological cycles, wear, repair intervals.
  • Socio-economic cycles and event calendar contours.
  • Spectral analysis, wavelets, phase synchronization, cross correlation.

8. Principle of Cause and Effect: Evidence

In SPECZASHCHITA, any hypothesis must be divided into correlation, mechanism, and causal effect. Causal graphs, control groups, baselines and post-evaluation are introduced for this.

Effect = Y(after, action) − Y(counterfactual)

  • Fixation of the starting point (baseline).
  • Description of the intervention and the responsible executor.
  • Set KPI and error ranges.
  • Comparison with the control scenario.
  • Independent verification of the result.

9. The Principle of Generation: The Innovation Cycle

The latter principle is useful to translate into the language of complementary processes: generation of options and their selection. It is not enough for an innovation system to generate ideas; tests, security filters, economics, and scaling are needed.

Idea -> Hypothesis -> Prototype> Pilot -> Validation -> Standard -> Scaling

10. Archeometer as a connecting core

An archeometer combines seven principles into a single measurement circuit. He does not "measure spirituality"; he calculates the state of a multidimensional system relative to given standards and constraints.

B(X) = α*C + β*S + γ*A + δ*V − η*D − mu*R

C - coherence, S - stability, A - adaptability, V - diversity, D - internal mismatch, R - risk/fragility. Weights are specified by the passport of a specific object, and not universal for all systems.

11. SPECZASHCHITA: Integrated architecture

ContourFunctionKey output
ObservationData of territory, objects, processesMeasurement flows, events, anomalies
EQUILIBRIUMAnalytics, forecast, scenariosIndices, models, warnings
ArcheometerIntegral assessment and balancePassport status, deviations, priorities
SFERAInitiatives, communications, participantsPortfolio of solutions and cooperation
ECO-PPALinkages between resources and measurable impactCommitments, KPI, financing
SPECZASHCHITAExecution and ScalingPilots, consortia, production, implementation

12. Decision-making protocol

01 Watch - Get data and determine the quality of sources.

02 Contextualize - Define the cycle, phase, external factors, and constraints.

03 Measure - Calculate connectivity, criticality, stability, and deviations.

04 Generate at least two alternative explanations/scenarios.

05 Check causality - Separate coincidence from mechanism and causal effect.

06 Select an action - Optimize the expected effect under specified risk constraints.

07 Execute - Appoint a person responsible, resources, deadlines, and checkpoints.

08 Validate - Match fact with forecast, update model and Archeometer weights.

13. Science, safety and limits of application

  • Philosophical principles are not considered empirical laws without independent confirmation.
  • Astronomical cycles are included in causal models only when there is a physical mechanism and statistical verification.
  • Correlations obtained in small samples are labeled as hypotheses.
  • Critical decisions on safety, ecology, medicine and finance require specialized regulatory procedures and expertise.
  • The archeometer stores the model version, the set of input data, weights, confidence intervals, and history of recalculations.
  • The system should allow reproducibility of calculations and external audit.

14. Pilot SPECZASHCHITA - KYBALION

The proposed pilot is one object or territory for which measurable data flows and performers already exist. The philosophical framework is tested not through persuasion, but through utility: whether it increases the completeness of questions, the quality of decisions and the speed of identifying risks.

StageTimeframeResultExit criterion
0. Passports2-4 weeksObject, data, indicators, owners>=80% Key Indicators Have Source
1. Basic model1-2 monthsGraph links, cycles, criticality, baselineReproducible calculation of indices
2. Pilot of decisions3-6 monthsA set of interventions and scenariosComparison of forecast/fact
3. Validation1-2 monthsEvidence reportIndependent confirmation of some effects
4. Scaling6-18 monthsModule standard SPECZASHCHITARepeatability on the second object

15. Final formula

The Kibalion in SPECZASHCHITA is useful not as a set of ready-made answers, but as seven constant questions to any complex system: what model is the basis of the solution; what is repeated on different scales; what is the dynamics; between what extremes is the operating mode; in what phase of the cycle is the object; what is the causal chain; how new solutions are born and selected.

Meaning -> Model -> Metrics -> Decision -> Execution -> Check -> Update the model

It is this closed cycle that turns the philosophical framework into an applied system for managing development and protection.

Annex A. Minimum module passport

  • Code and name of the module.
  • Object and scope of observation.
  • Purpose and function.
  • Inputs and source owners.
  • Set of indicators and calculation formulas.
  • Links to other modules.
  • Rhythms/cycles and refresh rate.
  • Thresholds and critical areas.
  • Scenarios of action.
  • Responsible executor.
  • Validation criteria and date of last check.

Annex B. Dictionary of key terms

Archeometer: An integral operator for estimating the multidimensional state and deviations from a given balance corridor.

Cosmoritmology: Analysis of cycles and phases of natural, technological, social and, with proven communication, astronomical processes.

Criticality Temometer: A standardized system distance index to critical/unstable mode.

Structural connectivity: Properties of a graph that determine reachability, integration, redundancy, and risk of fragmentation.

MetaProject recursion: Repetition of the basic management cycle at different system scales.

Single Balance: A working corridor between competing demands for sustainability, adaptability, diversity, resources, and risk.

Other published edition: KYBALION SPECZASCHITA_KIBALION.pptx · Web Text +

Systemic interpretation of the principles of Kibalion for the architecture of self-organization, security and development

7 PRINCIPLES

Archeometer

Single Balance

Cosmoritmology

KIBALION as a system framework

From the philosophical principle to the observed parameter and management action

What we change

What we get

The main principle

• Do not accept a symbolic thesis as fact

• Unified language of different industries

• Cybalion — layer of interpretation

• Translating it into a measurable hypothesis

• Model of causal relationships

• Archeometer — measurement layer

• Link to data and indicators

• Early warning protocol

• SPECZASHCHITA — execution layer

• Check on pilots and scripts

• Solution map SPECZASHCHITA

• Validation — Proof Layer

The Seven Principles of Cybalion

Engineering Interpretation for System Analysis

Mentalism

models, goals, expectations

Rhythm

Cycles and returns

Conformity

large-scale invariance

Cause-effect

Causal chains

Vibration

dynamics and frequencies

Rod

Complementarity of functions

Polarity

Dual Modes

Translation of principles into operational variables

From Quality Principle to Meter

Mentalism

Model quality and goal setting

Conformity

consistency of levels

Vibration

Frequency Spectrum / Variability

Polarity

Imbalance of Opposite Regimes

Rhythm

Cyclicity and phase synchronization

Causality

Causal connectivity

Complementarity

Balance of complementary functions

Result: 7 Principles → 7 Observed Classes of Indicators

Archeometer

Multidimensional System Harmonization Operator

A(X) → Diagnostics → Deviation → Action → Control

Coherence

entropy

conflict

Diversity

Fragility

Φ = αC − βH − γD + δV − λR

Single Balance

Not maximizing one metric, but a sustainable compromise

INTEGRATION

FLOW

STABILITY

ADAPTIVITY

coherence and integrity

energy, data, resources

feedback and sustainability

Ability to change regime

B = I × F × S × A

If one factor goes to zero, the system loses its viability.

Criticality Themometer

Mode evaluation: stagnation → criticality → chaos

Critical area

Use

• maximum sensitivity

• Early warning

λmax > 0

• long correlations

• setting of regulators

• High integration

• Risk assessment

• no avalanche decay

• comparison of scenarios

λmax ≈ 0

λmax < 0

Structural connectivity and percolation

When a set of elements becomes a system

LOW CONNECTION

THE PEP OF PERCOLATION

RELOADING

The goal is not maximum density, but sufficient connectivity while maintaining diversity.

Cosmoritmology

Astronomical cycles as external observable factors

24 h

29,53 d

1 years

≈11 years

Daily subsistence allowance

Lunar

Seasonal

Solnechny

The key principle is that a cycle is not a cause in itself; it becomes useful only after statistical verification of the relationship with the observed process.

X(t) = μ + Σ [aₖ cos(ωₖt) + bₖ sin(ωₖt)] + ε(t)

Mathematics of Tories

Multi-period dynamics and phase space

Tⁿ = S¹ × S¹ × … × S¹

Phase

What is a Toric Model

• combines multiple cycles

• describes repeatability

• allows you to search for phase windows

• supports scenario modeling

MetaProject recursion

One logic at each level of the system

Data → Analysis → Balance → Solution → Control

Module

Cluster

Contour

MetaProject

Each level can work autonomously, but uses a single evaluation and validation protocol.

SPECZASHCHITA: Integrated architecture

From observation to execution

OBSERVATION

ANALYTICS

COORDINATION

EXECUTION

• data

• Archeometer

• priority

• pilots

• registers

• rhythms

• resources

• cooperation

• monitoring

• risks

• scripts

• Scaling

Scenarios of application

Where Kibalion becomes a system management tool

Ecology

Energy

• Load cycles, recovery, early warning

• balance of generation, demand and risks

Infrastructure

Social systems

• Network stability and critical nodes

• Coherence, confidence, voltage

AI-ecosystems

Project management

• criticality, diversity, integration

• recursion, stage control, evidence

Decision protocol

Single management cycle

1. Signal

2. Data validation

3. Archeometer

4. Scripts

5. Decision

6. Implementation

7. Validation

Feedback returns the system to observation and corrects the model.

Validation and Evidence

The boundary between hypothesis and engineering solution

MUST

DO NOT ACCEPTED

RESULT

• data source

• Correlation by Causality

• module passport

• calculation method

• Unverifiable Numeric Constants

• version of algorithm

• control group / base line

• Selective matches

• log solutions

• criterion of success

• opaque weights indicators

• data audit

• repeatability

• scaling solution

Road map

From concept to test system SPECZASHCHITA

Formalization

Data

Pilot

Validation

Scaling

metrics and passports

Sources and API

1 territory / contour

comparison of scenarios

Registers and modules

PURPOSE

Unified evidentiary system of observation, harmonization and execution

Kibalion → Archeometer → SPECZASHCHITA

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

SOYUZ741 Connectivity Edges

Source Status: Primary Document

The document reveals the connections between the elements of the system and the rules for their coordination.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/rebra-svyazannosti-soyuz-741

Open on the site

Status: basic system module · Version 1.0

1. Module Assignment

The Ribs of Connectivity module defines the formal language of relations between nodes of Field Theory SOYUZ741. The edge is considered as a controlled channel through which meaning, data, function, resource, control impulse or feedback is transmitted. This approach allows you to describe the system as a graph and a hypergraph, measure the quality of connectivity and validate the architecture.

  • translate the semantic architecture into a formal network model;
  • create a single passport for each connection;
  • Identify critical, weak and redundant connections;
  • measure the coherence, stability and speed of flow;
  • to link 741 module into a single navigation system.

2. Basic definition

An edge-to-edge relationship between two or more nodes having a type, function, intensity, transmission rules, constraints, and result verification mechanism.

3. Formal rib model

For practical work, an extended rib passport is used:

E = ⟨u, v, τ, d, w, c, ℓ, q, t, f, κ⟩

ParameterMeaning
u, vsource and target nodes
τtype of communication
ddirection
wWeight / Communication Power
cthroughput
ℓtransmission delay
qQuality / Trust
tTemporary regime
fFlow Conversion Function
κValidation criteria

4. Twelve types of ribs

CodeTypeWhat carries / bindsExample
R1SmyslovoeObjectives, values, semantic correspondencesMeaning ↔ mission ↔ decision criteria
R2InformationData, signals, documents, knowledgeData source → analytics → registry
R3Resource and energyResources, capacity, energy, financingResource → conversion → user
R4FunctionalDependence of functions and processesFunction A activates/provides function B
R5CoordinatingSynchronization of participants and actionsCoordination Center ↔ performers
R6FeedbackResult, evaluation, correctionAction → Measurement → Adjustment
R7EvolutionaryTransition between states and maturityCapability → pilot → scaling
R8ResonanceMatching rhythms, goals or parametersSynchronization enhances the joint effect
R9HierarchicalSubmission, authority, decompositionStrategy → Program → Project → Task
R10SetevoeMultilateral cooperationCluster of nodes with distributed relationships
R11Structural-crystallineSymmetry, repeatability, interface standardThe typical pattern of communication is repeated on the system
R12IntersystemRelationship of different contours and scalesHuman ↔ organization ↔ state ↔ planet

5. Direction and topology

  • Oriented: A → B;
  • bidirectional: A ↔ B;
  • conditional: A —[condition]→ B;
  • temporary: active only in a given window;
  • Multinode Hyperrebro: One ratio binds multiple nodes at the same time.

Topologies: linear, radial, ring, hierarchical, grid, cluster, and hypergraph. For SOYUZ741 The basic is hybrid topology: local clusters + Intercluster Bridges + feedback loop.

6. Linkage Rib Passport

Passport fieldExamplePurpose
Rib IDE-023-144-R2Parameter identification and control
Source Node—Parameter identification and control
Host-receiver/set of nodes—Parameter identification and control
Type R1-R12R2Parameter identification and control
Purpose—Parameter identification and control
Transferred object—Parameter identification and control
Area of work—Parameter identification and control
Weight 0–10,85Parameter identification and control
Capacity—Parameter identification and control
Delay—Parameter identification and control
Reliability / Trust—Parameter identification and control
Temporary regime—Parameter identification and control
Owner of communication—Parameter identification and control
Activation conditions—Parameter identification and control
Risks of rupture—Parameter identification and control
Result metric—Parameter identification and control
Source of evidence—Parameter identification and control
Validation criterion—Parameter identification and control
StatusValidatedParameter identification and control

7. Metrics of quality connectivity

MetricsWhat measuresInterpretation
Density DThe relationship between actual and possibletoo low = Insulation; too high = Overload
Average degree knumber of links per nodeshows the saturation of the network
Centralityrole of the node as an intermediary/centerIdentify critical points
Modularity QExpression of clustersShows natural subsystems
Reliability RLikelihood of maintaining communicationcritical for control circuits
Delay LTime of signal passingImportant for operational management
Trust TQuality of source and confirmationDetermines the evidence
Sustainability SRetention of function in case of failuresMeasurement of Reservations

8. Rib validation

The rib is considered not just declared, but validated if four layers are confirmed:

  • semantic: communication has an understandable meaning and consistent purpose;
  • functional: there is an observed mechanism of transmission or impact;
  • given: there is a data source / document / event confirming the connection;
  • effective: the effect corresponding to the purpose of the rib is measured.

9. Relationship Levels SOYUZ741

L1 · Intra-module: connection parameters within one module

L2 · Inter-module: connections between modules of one field

L3 · Interrole: relations of different fields/continents of meaning

L4 · Intersystem: organization ↔ platform ↔ state contour

L5 · Metasystemic: connections of civilizational, planetary and cosmological models

10. Matrix "Node × Rib × Field"

For each of the 741 modules, it is recommended to store not only the passport of the node, but also the register of incoming and outgoing edges. Minimum recording:

Node_ID → Edge_ID → Target_Node_ID

Type of communication → transferred object → metric

Source of proof → validation status → update date

11. Rib duty cycle

1. Identify the nodes and the purpose of communication.

2. Assign Type R1 to R12.

3. Determine the transmitted object and direction.

4. Set weight, throughput, delay and trust.

5. Link the source of evidence.

6. Determine the result metric and threshold.

7. Perform validation.

8. Enable monitoring and feedback.

9. When the context changes, recalculate the parameters or break the connection.

12. Critical Patterns

PatternRiskCorrection
GapCommunication is not available where it is needed.Create a bridge/reserve channel
Bottle necktoo many threads through one nodeDistribute routes
Echo-cameraConnections are closed within the clusterAdd Intercluster Bridges
False communicationclaimed influence without proofReturn to Hypothesis
OverloadToo many weak linksPrioritize and Disable Noise
Single point of failureThere is no alternative routecreate a reservation

13. Place in the architecture of Globus Smyslov

In Globus Smyslov nodes form a "geography", and edges - transport, information and semantic infrastructure. Continents are defined by large regions, oceans by space, currents by dynamics, compasses by direction, and the edges of connectivity by specific routes and rules for the passage of flow between points.

14. Final formula

System = Nodes × Ribs × Threads × Feedback × Validation

The more precisely the relationships between nodes are defined and the better they are confirmed by data, the higher the explainability, stability and manageability of the entire architecture SOYUZ741.

Other published editorial board: REbra_svyazannosti_SOYUZ741.pptx · web text +

Field Theory SOYUZ741

From the image of communication to the formal passport, metrics and network validation

System = nodes × edges × threads × feedback × validation

1. What is rib binding

Basic unit of relationship between system nodes

Transmits

Has parameters

Rebro

Meaning · data · function · resource · command · feedback

Type · Direction · Weight · Delay · Trust · Time Mode

Gives effect

Must be verifiable

connects processes, reduces insulation, creates a route

Each critical connection is confirmed by data or observed result

The node answers, "What exists?" • The rib answers, "What is the connection, what is transmitted and with what result?"

2. Formal rib model

The passport must be sufficient for analysis, monitoring and validation

E = ⟨u, v, τ, d, w, c, ℓ, q, t, f, κ⟩

source and target node

type of communication

direction

Power / Weight

throughput

delay

Quality / Trust

Temporary regime

Flow Conversion

Validation criteria

3.1 Twelve types of ribs

R1-R6: Basic flows and control circuits

R1 ·

R2 ·

R3 · Resource and energy

goals, values, meaning

data, documents, knowledge

resource, energy, financing

R4 ·

R5 ·

R6 · Feedback

Dependence of functions and processes

Synchronization of participants

Measurement → Correction

3.2 Twelve types of ribs

R7-R12: development, structure and inter-system bridges

R7 ·

R8 ·

R9 ·

Transition of states and maturity

gain when parameters match

authority and decomposition

R10 · Setevoe

R11 · Structural-crystalline

R12 · Intersystem

multilateral cooperation

Repeated Interface Patterns

connection of different contours and scales

4. Direction and topology

How the edge is included in the structure of the graph

A —[condition]→ B

A,B,C ⇄ X

orientated

Bidirectional

Conditional

Hyperrebro

Hybrid topology SOYUZ741

  • Local Clusters Within Fields
  • Inter-cluster bridges between regions
  • Hierarchical contours of management
  • mandatory feedback loops
  • backup routes for critical flows

5. Passport rib

Minimum set of fields for the link registry

Identification

Settings

Quality

Evidence

• Rib ID

• Source

• Receiver / Node Set

• Type R1-R12

• Direction

• Weight 0–1

• Capacity

• Delay

• Temporary regime

• Reliability

• Trust

• Risk of rupture

• Reservation

• Result metric

• Source of evidence

• Validation criterion

• Status

Example ID: E-023-144-R2 | weight 0,85 | Status: Validated

6. Metrics of quality connectivity

Relationships should be measured, not just described.

D · Density

k · Average degree

C · Central

Q · Modularity

Percentage of actual links

Connections to the node

Role of Critical Nodes

Expression of clusters

R · Reliability

L · Delay

T · Trust

S · Sustainability

Maintaining communication

speed of passage

Quality of evidence

work in case of refusal

Objective: Not maximum density, but optimal connectivity - enough connections for integrity without overload and noise.

7. Four layers of validation

The rib is considered working only after confirmation of the mechanism and result

Semantic

Functional

This

Effective

Communication has clear meaning and purpose

there is an observed mechanism of transmission / impact

have a data source, document or event

Measure the effect corresponding to the purpose

Rule of Evidence: There is no confirmed flow or effect of →.

8. Critical Network Patterns

What to look for when auditing the edges of connectivity

Gap

Bottle neck

Echo-camera

No route required

→ create a bridge

all stream through one node

→ distribute

The cluster is self-contained

→ add external bridges

False communication

Overload

Refusal point

Impact stated without proof

→ back to hypothesis

Too many weak links

→ Disable Noise

There is no alternative route

→ create a reserve

9. Five levels of connectivity SOYUZ741

From Local Communication to Metasystem

L1 ·

Parameters within one module

L2 ·

Single Field Modules

L3 ·

Different fields / continents of meanings

L4 ·

Organization ↔ Platform ↔ State

L5 ·

Civilizational and planetary models

10. Ryobra in Globus Smyslov

Ribs turn meaningful geography into a working infrastructure

Continents

large semantic areas

Oceans and currents

Space and Exchange Dynamics

Compass

direction of development

Ribs of connectedness

specific routes, rules and proofs of flow

11. Rib duty cycle

From communication hypothesis to monitoring

Define Nodes

Adjust

Assign Type

LIVING

REBRO

Monitor

Describe the flow

Validate

Set Settings

Define Metrics

Link proof

FISH RELATIONSHIP

Nervous, transport and evidence system SOYUZ741

System = Nodes × Ribs × Threads × Feedback × Validation

The next system layer: The edge register 741 is a machine-readable matrix of all incoming and outgoing connections of each module.

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

Register of the 741 Fields of SOYUZ741

Source Status: Primary Document

A register of systemic fields and connections used in the SOYUZ741 architecture.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/reestr-741-polei-soyuz-741

Open on the site

Version 1.0 · 25 August 2026

Registry architecture

741 = 13 Field Families × 19 Base Nodes × 3 Status.

Condition: D - Diagnostics; K - Coordination; R is development.

Module code: Sxx-Nxx-D/K/R. Example: S05-N06-D - diagnostics of knowledge in the family "Information and data".

Each module passport contains: code, function, metrics, data, formula, links and validation criteria.

The registry is an author's system model. Index formulas are project operating models and require calibration on empirical data for each application circuit.

Legend of formulas

D: D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T. C - completeness of coverage; Q - quality/reliability; T - relevance of data.

K: K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R. A is consistency; L - Connectivity; R - availability of resources.

R: R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V. G - increase in result; S - stability; V - reproducibility/scalability.

S01 · Unity and Management

Family function: integrity, subjectivity, and coherent management. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S01-N01-DDiagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N01-K, S01-N01-R, S01-N02-D, S13-N01-D, S02-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N01-KCoordination of the "Subject" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N01-D, S01-N01-R, S01-N02-K, S13-N01-K, S02-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N01-RDevelopment of the "Subject" node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N01-D, S01-N01-K, S01-N02-R, S13-N01-R, S02-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N02-DDiagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N02-K, S01-N02-R, S01-N01-D, S01-N03-D, S13-N02-D, S02-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N02-KCoordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N02-D, S01-N02-R, S01-N01-K, S01-N03-K, S13-N02-K, S02-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N02-RDevelopment of the “Purpose” node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N02-D, S01-N02-K, S01-N01-R, S01-N03-R, S13-N02-R, S02-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N03-K, S01-N03-R, S01-N02-D, S01-N04-D, S13-N03-D, S02-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N03-D, S01-N03-R, S01-N02-K, S01-N04-K, S13-N03-K, S02-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N03-D, S01-N03-K, S01-N02-R, S01-N04-R, S13-N03-R, S02-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N04-K, S01-N04-R, S01-N03-D, S01-N05-D, S13-N04-D, S02-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N04-D, S01-N04-R, S01-N03-K, S01-N05-K, S13-N04-K, S02-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N04-D, S01-N04-K, S01-N03-R, S01-N05-R, S13-N04-R, S02-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N05-K, S01-N05-R, S01-N04-D, S01-N06-D, S13-N05-D, S02-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N05-KCoordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the management field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N05-D, S01-N05-R, S01-N04-K, S01-N06-K, S13-N05-K, S02-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N05-D, S01-N05-K, S01-N04-R, S01-N06-R, S13-N05-R, S02-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N06-DDiagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N06-K, S01-N06-R, S01-N05-D, S01-N07-D, S13-N06-D, S02-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N06-KCoordination of the Knowledge node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N06-D, S01-N06-R, S01-N05-K, S01-N07-K, S13-N06-K, S02-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N06-D, S01-N06-K, S01-N05-R, S01-N07-R, S13-N06-R, S02-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N07-DDiagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N07-K, S01-N07-R, S01-N06-D, S01-N08-D, S13-N07-D, S02-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N07-KCoordination of the "Solution" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N07-D, S01-N07-R, S01-N06-K, S01-N08-K, S13-N07-K, S02-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N07-RDevelopment of the "Solution" node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N07-D, S01-N07-K, S01-N06-R, S01-N08-R, S13-N07-R, S02-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N08-DDiagnostics of the Action node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N08-K, S01-N08-R, S01-N07-D, S01-N09-D, S13-N08-D, S02-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N08-KCoordination of the node "Action" in the contour of the management field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N08-D, S01-N08-R, S01-N07-K, S01-N09-K, S13-N08-K, S02-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N08-D, S01-N08-K, S01-N07-R, S01-N09-R, S13-N08-R, S02-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N09-DDiagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N09-K, S01-N09-R, S01-N08-D, S01-N10-D, S13-N09-D, S02-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N09-D, S01-N09-R, S01-N08-K, S01-N10-K, S13-N09-K, S02-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N09-D, S01-N09-K, S01-N08-R, S01-N10-R, S13-N09-R, S02-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N10-DDiagnostics of the Risk node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N10-K, S01-N10-R, S01-N09-D, S01-N11-D, S13-N10-D, S02-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N10-KCoordination of the Risk node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N10-D, S01-N10-R, S01-N09-K, S01-N11-K, S13-N10-K, S02-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N10-D, S01-N10-K, S01-N09-R, S01-N11-R, S13-N10-R, S02-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N11-K, S01-N11-R, S01-N10-D, S01-N12-D, S13-N11-D, S02-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N11-KCoordination of the “Trust” node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N11-D, S01-N11-R, S01-N10-K, S01-N12-K, S13-N11-K, S02-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N11-RDevelopment of the trust node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N11-D, S01-N11-K, S01-N10-R, S01-N12-R, S13-N11-R, S02-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N12-DDiagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N12-K, S01-N12-R, S01-N11-D, S01-N13-D, S13-N12-D, S02-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N12-KCoordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N12-D, S01-N12-R, S01-N11-K, S01-N13-K, S13-N12-K, S02-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N12-D, S01-N12-K, S01-N11-R, S01-N13-R, S13-N12-R, S02-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N13-DDiagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N13-K, S01-N13-R, S01-N12-D, S01-N14-D, S13-N13-D, S02-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N13-KCoordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N13-D, S01-N13-R, S01-N12-K, S01-N14-K, S13-N13-K, S02-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N13-RDevelopment of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N13-D, S01-N13-K, S01-N12-R, S01-N14-R, S13-N13-R, S02-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N14-DDiagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N14-K, S01-N14-R, S01-N13-D, S01-N15-D, S13-N14-D, S02-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N14-KCoordination of the “Standard” node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N14-D, S01-N14-R, S01-N13-K, S01-N15-K, S13-N14-K, S02-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N14-RDevelopment of the Standard node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N14-D, S01-N14-K, S01-N13-R, S01-N15-R, S13-N14-R, S02-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N15-DDiagnostics of the "Finance" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N15-K, S01-N15-R, S01-N14-D, S01-N16-D, S13-N15-D, S02-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N15-D, S01-N15-R, S01-N14-K, S01-N16-K, S13-N15-K, S02-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N15-RDevelopment of the "Finance" node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N15-D, S01-N15-K, S01-N14-R, S01-N16-R, S13-N15-R, S02-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N16-DDiagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N16-K, S01-N16-R, S01-N15-D, S01-N17-D, S13-N16-D, S02-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N16-D, S01-N16-R, S01-N15-K, S01-N17-K, S13-N16-K, S02-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N16-RDevelopment of the Personnel node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N16-D, S01-N16-K, S01-N15-R, S01-N17-R, S13-N16-R, S02-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N17-DDiagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N17-K, S01-N17-R, S01-N16-D, S01-N18-D, S13-N17-D, S02-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N17-KCoordination of the "Technology" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N17-D, S01-N17-R, S01-N16-K, S01-N18-K, S13-N17-K, S02-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N17-D, S01-N17-K, S01-N16-R, S01-N18-R, S13-N17-R, S02-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N18-DDiagnosis of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N18-K, S01-N18-R, S01-N17-D, S01-N19-D, S13-N18-D, S02-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N18-KCoordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of the management field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N18-D, S01-N18-R, S01-N17-K, S01-N19-K, S13-N18-K, S02-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N18-RDevelopment of the “Environment” node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N18-D, S01-N18-K, S01-N17-R, S01-N19-R, S13-N18-R, S02-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S01-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS01-N19-K, S01-N19-R, S01-N18-D, S13-N19-D, S02-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S01-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the management field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS01-N19-D, S01-N19-R, S01-N18-K, S13-N19-K, S02-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S01-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the management field: to change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS01-N19-D, S01-N19-K, S01-N18-R, S13-N19-R, S02-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S02 · Meaning and Values

The function of the family: purpose, values, identity and social meaning. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S02-N01-DDiagnosis of the "Subject" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N01-K, S02-N01-R, S02-N02-D, S01-N01-D, S03-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N01-KCoordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N01-D, S02-N01-R, S02-N02-K, S01-N01-K, S03-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N01-RDevelopment of the node "Subject" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N01-D, S02-N01-K, S02-N02-R, S01-N01-R, S03-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N02-DDiagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N02-K, S02-N02-R, S02-N01-D, S02-N03-D, S01-N02-D, S03-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N02-KCoordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N02-D, S02-N02-R, S02-N01-K, S02-N03-K, S01-N02-K, S03-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N02-RDevelopment of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N02-D, S02-N02-K, S02-N01-R, S02-N03-R, S01-N02-R, S03-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N03-K, S02-N03-R, S02-N02-D, S02-N04-D, S01-N03-D, S03-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N03-D, S02-N03-R, S02-N02-K, S02-N04-K, S01-N03-K, S03-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N03-D, S02-N03-K, S02-N02-R, S02-N04-R, S01-N03-R, S03-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N04-K, S02-N04-R, S02-N03-D, S02-N05-D, S01-N04-D, S03-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N04-D, S02-N04-R, S02-N03-K, S02-N05-K, S01-N04-K, S03-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N04-D, S02-N04-K, S02-N03-R, S02-N05-R, S01-N04-R, S03-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N05-K, S02-N05-R, S02-N04-D, S02-N06-D, S01-N05-D, S03-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N05-KCoordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N05-D, S02-N05-R, S02-N04-K, S02-N06-K, S01-N05-K, S03-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N05-D, S02-N05-K, S02-N04-R, S02-N06-R, S01-N05-R, S03-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N06-DDiagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N06-K, S02-N06-R, S02-N05-D, S02-N07-D, S01-N06-D, S03-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N06-KCoordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N06-D, S02-N06-R, S02-N05-K, S02-N07-K, S01-N06-K, S03-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N06-RDevelopment of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N06-D, S02-N06-K, S02-N05-R, S02-N07-R, S01-N06-R, S03-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N07-DDiagnostics of the node "Solution" in the contour of the semantic field: to measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N07-K, S02-N07-R, S02-N06-D, S02-N08-D, S01-N07-D, S03-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N07-KCoordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N07-D, S02-N07-R, S02-N06-K, S02-N08-K, S01-N07-K, S03-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N07-RDevelopment of the node "Solution" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N07-D, S02-N07-K, S02-N06-R, S02-N08-R, S01-N07-R, S03-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N08-DDiagnostics of the "Action" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N08-K, S02-N08-R, S02-N07-D, S02-N09-D, S01-N08-D, S03-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N08-KCoordination of the node "Action" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N08-D, S02-N08-R, S02-N07-K, S02-N09-K, S01-N08-K, S03-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N08-RDevelopment of the node "Action" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N08-D, S02-N08-K, S02-N07-R, S02-N09-R, S01-N08-R, S03-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N09-DDiagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N09-K, S02-N09-R, S02-N08-D, S02-N10-D, S01-N09-D, S03-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N09-D, S02-N09-R, S02-N08-K, S02-N10-K, S01-N09-K, S03-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N09-D, S02-N09-K, S02-N08-R, S02-N10-R, S01-N09-R, S03-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N10-DDiagnosis of the "Risk" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N10-K, S02-N10-R, S02-N09-D, S02-N11-D, S01-N10-D, S03-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N10-KCoordination of the node "Risk" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N10-D, S02-N10-R, S02-N09-K, S02-N11-K, S01-N10-K, S03-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N10-D, S02-N10-K, S02-N09-R, S02-N11-R, S01-N10-R, S03-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N11-K, S02-N11-R, S02-N10-D, S02-N12-D, S01-N11-D, S03-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N11-KCoordination of the "Trust" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N11-D, S02-N11-R, S02-N10-K, S02-N12-K, S01-N11-K, S03-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N11-RThe development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N11-D, S02-N11-K, S02-N10-R, S02-N12-R, S01-N11-R, S03-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N12-DDiagnosis of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N12-K, S02-N12-R, S02-N11-D, S02-N13-D, S01-N12-D, S03-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N12-KCoordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N12-D, S02-N12-R, S02-N11-K, S02-N13-K, S01-N12-K, S03-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N12-D, S02-N12-K, S02-N11-R, S02-N13-R, S01-N12-R, S03-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N13-DDiagnostics of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the semantic field: to measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N13-K, S02-N13-R, S02-N12-D, S02-N14-D, S01-N13-D, S03-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N13-KCoordination of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N13-D, S02-N13-R, S02-N12-K, S02-N14-K, S01-N13-K, S03-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N13-RDevelopment of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N13-D, S02-N13-K, S02-N12-R, S02-N14-R, S01-N13-R, S03-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N14-DDiagnostics of the node "Standard" in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N14-K, S02-N14-R, S02-N13-D, S02-N15-D, S01-N14-D, S03-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N14-KCoordination of the node "Standard" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N14-D, S02-N14-R, S02-N13-K, S02-N15-K, S01-N14-K, S03-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N14-RDevelopment of the node "Standard" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N14-D, S02-N14-K, S02-N13-R, S02-N15-R, S01-N14-R, S03-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N15-DDiagnosis of the "Finance" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N15-K, S02-N15-R, S02-N14-D, S02-N16-D, S01-N15-D, S03-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N15-D, S02-N15-R, S02-N14-K, S02-N16-K, S01-N15-K, S03-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N15-RDevelopment of the "Finance" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N15-D, S02-N15-K, S02-N14-R, S02-N16-R, S01-N15-R, S03-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N16-DDiagnosis of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N16-K, S02-N16-R, S02-N15-D, S02-N17-D, S01-N16-D, S03-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N16-D, S02-N16-R, S02-N15-K, S02-N17-K, S01-N16-K, S03-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N16-RDevelopment of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N16-D, S02-N16-K, S02-N15-R, S02-N17-R, S01-N16-R, S03-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N17-DDiagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of the semantic field: to measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N17-K, S02-N17-R, S02-N16-D, S02-N18-D, S01-N17-D, S03-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N17-KCoordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N17-D, S02-N17-R, S02-N16-K, S02-N18-K, S01-N17-K, S03-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N17-D, S02-N17-K, S02-N16-R, S02-N18-R, S01-N17-R, S03-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N18-DDiagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the semantic field: to measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N18-K, S02-N18-R, S02-N17-D, S02-N19-D, S01-N18-D, S03-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N18-KCoordination of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N18-D, S02-N18-R, S02-N17-K, S02-N19-K, S01-N18-K, S03-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N18-RDevelopment of the node "Environment" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N18-D, S02-N18-K, S02-N17-R, S02-N19-R, S01-N18-R, S03-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S02-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS02-N19-K, S02-N19-R, S02-N18-D, S01-N19-D, S03-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S02-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS02-N19-D, S02-N19-R, S02-N18-K, S01-N19-K, S03-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S02-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS02-N19-D, S02-N19-K, S02-N18-R, S01-N19-R, S03-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S03 · Time and Cycles

Family Function: Rhythms, Stages, Timing, Scenarios and Development Cycles. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S03-N01-DDiagnosis of the "Subject" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N01-K, S03-N01-R, S03-N02-D, S02-N01-D, S04-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N01-KCoordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the time field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N01-D, S03-N01-R, S03-N02-K, S02-N01-K, S04-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N01-RDevelopment of the subject node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N01-D, S03-N01-K, S03-N02-R, S02-N01-R, S04-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N02-DDiagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N02-K, S03-N02-R, S03-N01-D, S03-N03-D, S02-N02-D, S04-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N02-KCoordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N02-D, S03-N02-R, S03-N01-K, S03-N03-K, S02-N02-K, S04-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N02-RDevelopment of the "Target" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N02-D, S03-N02-K, S03-N01-R, S03-N03-R, S02-N02-R, S04-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N03-K, S03-N03-R, S03-N02-D, S03-N04-D, S02-N03-D, S04-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N03-D, S03-N03-R, S03-N02-K, S03-N04-K, S02-N03-K, S04-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N03-D, S03-N03-K, S03-N02-R, S03-N04-R, S02-N03-R, S04-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N04-DDiagnosis of the Resource node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N04-K, S03-N04-R, S03-N03-D, S03-N05-D, S02-N04-D, S04-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N04-D, S03-N04-R, S03-N03-K, S03-N05-K, S02-N04-K, S04-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N04-D, S03-N04-K, S03-N03-R, S03-N05-R, S02-N04-R, S04-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N05-K, S03-N05-R, S03-N04-D, S03-N06-D, S02-N05-D, S04-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N05-KCoordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the time field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N05-D, S03-N05-R, S03-N04-K, S03-N06-K, S02-N05-K, S04-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the time field contour: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N05-D, S03-N05-K, S03-N04-R, S03-N06-R, S02-N05-R, S04-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N06-DDiagnosis of the Knowledge node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N06-K, S03-N06-R, S03-N05-D, S03-N07-D, S02-N06-D, S04-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N06-KCoordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N06-D, S03-N06-R, S03-N05-K, S03-N07-K, S02-N06-K, S04-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the time field contour: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N06-D, S03-N06-K, S03-N05-R, S03-N07-R, S02-N06-R, S04-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N07-DDiagnosis of the "Solution" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N07-K, S03-N07-R, S03-N06-D, S03-N08-D, S02-N07-D, S04-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N07-KCoordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the time field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N07-D, S03-N07-R, S03-N06-K, S03-N08-K, S02-N07-K, S04-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N07-RDevelopment of the "Solution" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N07-D, S03-N07-K, S03-N06-R, S03-N08-R, S02-N07-R, S04-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N08-DDiagnostics of the Action node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N08-K, S03-N08-R, S03-N07-D, S03-N09-D, S02-N08-D, S04-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N08-KCoordination of the "Action" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N08-D, S03-N08-R, S03-N07-K, S03-N09-K, S02-N08-K, S04-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the time field contour: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N08-D, S03-N08-K, S03-N07-R, S03-N09-R, S02-N08-R, S04-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N09-DDiagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N09-K, S03-N09-R, S03-N08-D, S03-N10-D, S02-N09-D, S04-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N09-D, S03-N09-R, S03-N08-K, S03-N10-K, S02-N09-K, S04-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the time field contour: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N09-D, S03-N09-K, S03-N08-R, S03-N10-R, S02-N09-R, S04-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N10-DDiagnosis of the Risk node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N10-K, S03-N10-R, S03-N09-D, S03-N11-D, S02-N10-D, S04-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N10-KCoordination of the node "Risk" in the contour of the time field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N10-D, S03-N10-R, S03-N09-K, S03-N11-K, S02-N10-K, S04-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N10-D, S03-N10-K, S03-N09-R, S03-N11-R, S02-N10-R, S04-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N11-DDiagnostics of the Trust node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N11-K, S03-N11-R, S03-N10-D, S03-N12-D, S02-N11-D, S04-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N11-KCoordination of the "Trust" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N11-D, S03-N11-R, S03-N10-K, S03-N12-K, S02-N11-K, S04-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N11-RDevelopment of the "Trust" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N11-D, S03-N11-K, S03-N10-R, S03-N12-R, S02-N11-R, S04-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N12-DDiagnosis of the "Cooperation" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N12-K, S03-N12-R, S03-N11-D, S03-N13-D, S02-N12-D, S04-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N12-KCoordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N12-D, S03-N12-R, S03-N11-K, S03-N13-K, S02-N12-K, S04-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N12-D, S03-N12-K, S03-N11-R, S03-N13-R, S02-N12-R, S04-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N13-DDiagnostics of the Infrastructure node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N13-K, S03-N13-R, S03-N12-D, S03-N14-D, S02-N13-D, S04-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N13-KCoordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N13-D, S03-N13-R, S03-N12-K, S03-N14-K, S02-N13-K, S04-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N13-RDevelopment of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N13-D, S03-N13-K, S03-N12-R, S03-N14-R, S02-N13-R, S04-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N14-DDiagnostics of the Standard node in the time field contour: measure current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N14-K, S03-N14-R, S03-N13-D, S03-N15-D, S02-N14-D, S04-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N14-KCoordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N14-D, S03-N14-R, S03-N13-K, S03-N15-K, S02-N14-K, S04-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N14-RDevelopment of the Standard node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N14-D, S03-N14-K, S03-N13-R, S03-N15-R, S02-N14-R, S04-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N15-DDiagnostics of the "Finance" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N15-K, S03-N15-R, S03-N14-D, S03-N16-D, S02-N15-D, S04-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N15-D, S03-N15-R, S03-N14-K, S03-N16-K, S02-N15-K, S04-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N15-RDevelopment of the Finance node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N15-D, S03-N15-K, S03-N14-R, S03-N16-R, S02-N15-R, S04-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N16-DDiagnosis of the "Personnel" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N16-K, S03-N16-R, S03-N15-D, S03-N17-D, S02-N16-D, S04-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N16-D, S03-N16-R, S03-N15-K, S03-N17-K, S02-N16-K, S04-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N16-RDevelopment of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N16-D, S03-N16-K, S03-N15-R, S03-N17-R, S02-N16-R, S04-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N17-DDiagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of the time field: to measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N17-K, S03-N17-R, S03-N16-D, S03-N18-D, S02-N17-D, S04-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N17-KCoordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the time field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N17-D, S03-N17-R, S03-N16-K, S03-N18-K, S02-N17-K, S04-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N17-D, S03-N17-K, S03-N16-R, S03-N18-R, S02-N17-R, S04-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N18-DDiagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the time field: to measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N18-K, S03-N18-R, S03-N17-D, S03-N19-D, S02-N18-D, S04-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N18-KCoordination of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N18-D, S03-N18-R, S03-N17-K, S03-N19-K, S02-N18-K, S04-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N18-RDevelopment of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N18-D, S03-N18-K, S03-N17-R, S03-N19-R, S02-N18-R, S04-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S03-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the time field: measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS03-N19-K, S03-N19-R, S03-N18-D, S02-N19-D, S04-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S03-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the time field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS03-N19-D, S03-N19-R, S03-N18-K, S02-N19-K, S04-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S03-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS03-N19-D, S03-N19-K, S03-N18-R, S02-N19-R, S04-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S04 · Energy and resources

Function of the family: resource security, energy and material flows. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S04-N01-DDiagnostics of the "Subject" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N01-K, S04-N01-R, S04-N02-D, S03-N01-D, S05-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N01-KCoordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N01-D, S04-N01-R, S04-N02-K, S03-N01-K, S05-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N01-RDevelopment of the subject node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N01-D, S04-N01-K, S04-N02-R, S03-N01-R, S05-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N02-DDiagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N02-K, S04-N02-R, S04-N01-D, S04-N03-D, S03-N02-D, S05-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N02-KCoordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N02-D, S04-N02-R, S04-N01-K, S04-N03-K, S03-N02-K, S05-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N02-RDevelopment of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N02-D, S04-N02-K, S04-N01-R, S04-N03-R, S03-N02-R, S05-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N03-K, S04-N03-R, S04-N02-D, S04-N04-D, S03-N03-D, S05-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N03-D, S04-N03-R, S04-N02-K, S04-N04-K, S03-N03-K, S05-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N03-D, S04-N03-K, S04-N02-R, S04-N04-R, S03-N03-R, S05-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N04-K, S04-N04-R, S04-N03-D, S04-N05-D, S03-N04-D, S05-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N04-D, S04-N04-R, S04-N03-K, S04-N05-K, S03-N04-K, S05-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N04-D, S04-N04-K, S04-N03-R, S04-N05-R, S03-N04-R, S05-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N05-K, S04-N05-R, S04-N04-D, S04-N06-D, S03-N05-D, S05-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N05-KCoordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N05-D, S04-N05-R, S04-N04-K, S04-N06-K, S03-N05-K, S05-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N05-D, S04-N05-K, S04-N04-R, S04-N06-R, S03-N05-R, S05-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N06-DDiagnostics of the Knowledge node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N06-K, S04-N06-R, S04-N05-D, S04-N07-D, S03-N06-D, S05-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N06-KCoordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N06-D, S04-N06-R, S04-N05-K, S04-N07-K, S03-N06-K, S05-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the resource field contour: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N06-D, S04-N06-K, S04-N05-R, S04-N07-R, S03-N06-R, S05-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N07-DDiagnostics of the node "Solution" in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N07-K, S04-N07-R, S04-N06-D, S04-N08-D, S03-N07-D, S05-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N07-KCoordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N07-D, S04-N07-R, S04-N06-K, S04-N08-K, S03-N07-K, S05-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N07-RDevelopment of the "Solution" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N07-D, S04-N07-K, S04-N06-R, S04-N08-R, S03-N07-R, S05-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N08-DDiagnostics of the Action node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N08-K, S04-N08-R, S04-N07-D, S04-N09-D, S03-N08-D, S05-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N08-KCoordination of the node "Action" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N08-D, S04-N08-R, S04-N07-K, S04-N09-K, S03-N08-K, S05-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N08-D, S04-N08-K, S04-N07-R, S04-N09-R, S03-N08-R, S05-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N09-DDiagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N09-K, S04-N09-R, S04-N08-D, S04-N10-D, S03-N09-D, S05-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N09-D, S04-N09-R, S04-N08-K, S04-N10-K, S03-N09-K, S05-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N09-RDevelopment of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N09-D, S04-N09-K, S04-N08-R, S04-N10-R, S03-N09-R, S05-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N10-DDiagnostics of the Risk node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N10-K, S04-N10-R, S04-N09-D, S04-N11-D, S03-N10-D, S05-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N10-KCoordination of the Risk node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N10-D, S04-N10-R, S04-N09-K, S04-N11-K, S03-N10-K, S05-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the resource field contour: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N10-D, S04-N10-K, S04-N09-R, S04-N11-R, S03-N10-R, S05-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N11-K, S04-N11-R, S04-N10-D, S04-N12-D, S03-N11-D, S05-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N11-KCoordination of the node "Trust" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N11-D, S04-N11-R, S04-N10-K, S04-N12-K, S03-N11-K, S05-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N11-RDevelopment of the "Trust" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N11-D, S04-N11-K, S04-N10-R, S04-N12-R, S03-N11-R, S05-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N12-DDiagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N12-K, S04-N12-R, S04-N11-D, S04-N13-D, S03-N12-D, S05-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N12-KCoordination of the node "Cooperation" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N12-D, S04-N12-R, S04-N11-K, S04-N13-K, S03-N12-K, S05-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N12-D, S04-N12-K, S04-N11-R, S04-N13-R, S03-N12-R, S05-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N13-DDiagnostics of the Infrastructure node in the resource field contour: measure current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N13-K, S04-N13-R, S04-N12-D, S04-N14-D, S03-N13-D, S05-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N13-KCoordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N13-D, S04-N13-R, S04-N12-K, S04-N14-K, S03-N13-K, S05-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N13-RDevelopment of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N13-D, S04-N13-K, S04-N12-R, S04-N14-R, S03-N13-R, S05-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N14-DDiagnostics of the "Standard" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N14-K, S04-N14-R, S04-N13-D, S04-N15-D, S03-N14-D, S05-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N14-KCoordination of the node "Standard" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N14-D, S04-N14-R, S04-N13-K, S04-N15-K, S03-N14-K, S05-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N14-RDevelopment of the Standard node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N14-D, S04-N14-K, S04-N13-R, S04-N15-R, S03-N14-R, S05-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N15-DDiagnostics of the "Finance" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N15-K, S04-N15-R, S04-N14-D, S04-N16-D, S03-N15-D, S05-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N15-D, S04-N15-R, S04-N14-K, S04-N16-K, S03-N15-K, S05-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N15-RDevelopment of the "Finance" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N15-D, S04-N15-K, S04-N14-R, S04-N16-R, S03-N15-R, S05-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N16-DDiagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N16-K, S04-N16-R, S04-N15-D, S04-N17-D, S03-N16-D, S05-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N16-D, S04-N16-R, S04-N15-K, S04-N17-K, S03-N16-K, S05-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N16-RThe development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N16-D, S04-N16-K, S04-N15-R, S04-N17-R, S03-N16-R, S05-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N17-DDiagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N17-K, S04-N17-R, S04-N16-D, S04-N18-D, S03-N17-D, S05-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N17-KCoordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N17-D, S04-N17-R, S04-N16-K, S04-N18-K, S03-N17-K, S05-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N17-D, S04-N17-K, S04-N16-R, S04-N18-R, S03-N17-R, S05-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N18-DDiagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the resource field: to measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N18-K, S04-N18-R, S04-N17-D, S04-N19-D, S03-N18-D, S05-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N18-KCoordination of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N18-D, S04-N18-R, S04-N17-K, S04-N19-K, S03-N18-K, S05-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N18-RDevelopment of the "Environment" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N18-D, S04-N18-K, S04-N17-R, S04-N19-R, S03-N18-R, S05-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S04-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS04-N19-K, S04-N19-R, S04-N18-D, S03-N19-D, S05-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S04-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS04-N19-D, S04-N19-R, S04-N18-K, S03-N19-K, S05-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S04-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS04-N19-D, S04-N19-K, S04-N18-R, S03-N19-R, S05-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S05 · Information and data

Family function: data, knowledge, digital footprints and analytics. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S05-N01-DDiagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the information field: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N01-K, S05-N01-R, S05-N02-D, S04-N01-D, S06-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N01-KCoordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N01-D, S05-N01-R, S05-N02-K, S04-N01-K, S06-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N01-RDevelopment of the subject node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N01-D, S05-N01-K, S05-N02-R, S04-N01-R, S06-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N02-DDiagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N02-K, S05-N02-R, S05-N01-D, S05-N03-D, S04-N02-D, S06-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N02-KCoordination of the "Purpose" node in the information field contour: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N02-D, S05-N02-R, S05-N01-K, S05-N03-K, S04-N02-K, S06-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N02-RDevelopment of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N02-D, S05-N02-K, S05-N01-R, S05-N03-R, S04-N02-R, S06-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N03-K, S05-N03-R, S05-N02-D, S05-N04-D, S04-N03-D, S06-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N03-D, S05-N03-R, S05-N02-K, S05-N04-K, S04-N03-K, S06-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N03-D, S05-N03-K, S05-N02-R, S05-N04-R, S04-N03-R, S06-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N04-K, S05-N04-R, S05-N03-D, S05-N05-D, S04-N04-D, S06-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N04-D, S05-N04-R, S05-N03-K, S05-N05-K, S04-N04-K, S06-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N04-D, S05-N04-K, S05-N03-R, S05-N05-R, S04-N04-R, S06-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N05-K, S05-N05-R, S05-N04-D, S05-N06-D, S04-N05-D, S06-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N05-KCoordination of the Signal node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N05-D, S05-N05-R, S05-N04-K, S05-N06-K, S04-N05-K, S06-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the information field contour: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N05-D, S05-N05-K, S05-N04-R, S05-N06-R, S04-N05-R, S06-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N06-DDiagnostics of the Knowledge node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N06-K, S05-N06-R, S05-N05-D, S05-N07-D, S04-N06-D, S06-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N06-KCoordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N06-D, S05-N06-R, S05-N05-K, S05-N07-K, S04-N06-K, S06-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N06-D, S05-N06-K, S05-N05-R, S05-N07-R, S04-N06-R, S06-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N07-DDiagnostics of the "Solution" node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N07-K, S05-N07-R, S05-N06-D, S05-N08-D, S04-N07-D, S06-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N07-KCoordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N07-D, S05-N07-R, S05-N06-K, S05-N08-K, S04-N07-K, S06-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N07-RDevelopment of the "Solution" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N07-D, S05-N07-K, S05-N06-R, S05-N08-R, S04-N07-R, S06-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N08-DDiagnostics of the Action node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N08-K, S05-N08-R, S05-N07-D, S05-N09-D, S04-N08-D, S06-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N08-KCoordination of the node "Action" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N08-D, S05-N08-R, S05-N07-K, S05-N09-K, S04-N08-K, S06-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the information field contour: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N08-D, S05-N08-K, S05-N07-R, S05-N09-R, S04-N08-R, S06-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N09-DDiagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the information field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N09-K, S05-N09-R, S05-N08-D, S05-N10-D, S04-N09-D, S06-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N09-D, S05-N09-R, S05-N08-K, S05-N10-K, S04-N09-K, S06-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N09-D, S05-N09-K, S05-N08-R, S05-N10-R, S04-N09-R, S06-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N10-DDiagnostics of the Risk node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N10-K, S05-N10-R, S05-N09-D, S05-N11-D, S04-N10-D, S06-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N10-KCoordination of the Risk node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N10-D, S05-N10-R, S05-N09-K, S05-N11-K, S04-N10-K, S06-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the information field contour: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N10-D, S05-N10-K, S05-N09-R, S05-N11-R, S04-N10-R, S06-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N11-K, S05-N11-R, S05-N10-D, S05-N12-D, S04-N11-D, S06-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N11-KCoordination of the node "Trust" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N11-D, S05-N11-R, S05-N10-K, S05-N12-K, S04-N11-K, S06-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N11-RThe development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N11-D, S05-N11-K, S05-N10-R, S05-N12-R, S04-N11-R, S06-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N12-DDiagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N12-K, S05-N12-R, S05-N11-D, S05-N13-D, S04-N12-D, S06-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N12-KCoordination of the node "Cooperation" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N12-D, S05-N12-R, S05-N11-K, S05-N13-K, S04-N12-K, S06-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N12-D, S05-N12-K, S05-N11-R, S05-N13-R, S04-N12-R, S06-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N13-DDiagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the information field: measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N13-K, S05-N13-R, S05-N12-D, S05-N14-D, S04-N13-D, S06-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N13-KCoordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N13-D, S05-N13-R, S05-N12-K, S05-N14-K, S04-N13-K, S06-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N13-RThe development of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N13-D, S05-N13-K, S05-N12-R, S05-N14-R, S04-N13-R, S06-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N14-DDiagnostics of the "Standard" node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N14-K, S05-N14-R, S05-N13-D, S05-N15-D, S04-N14-D, S06-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N14-KCoordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N14-D, S05-N14-R, S05-N13-K, S05-N15-K, S04-N14-K, S06-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N14-RDevelopment of the Standard node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N14-D, S05-N14-K, S05-N13-R, S05-N15-R, S04-N14-R, S06-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N15-DDiagnostics of the "Finance" node in the information field contour: to measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N15-K, S05-N15-R, S05-N14-D, S05-N16-D, S04-N15-D, S06-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N15-D, S05-N15-R, S05-N14-K, S05-N16-K, S04-N15-K, S06-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N15-RDevelopment of the "Finance" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N15-D, S05-N15-K, S05-N14-R, S05-N16-R, S04-N15-R, S06-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N16-DDiagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the information field: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N16-K, S05-N16-R, S05-N15-D, S05-N17-D, S04-N16-D, S06-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N16-D, S05-N16-R, S05-N15-K, S05-N17-K, S04-N16-K, S06-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N16-RThe development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N16-D, S05-N16-K, S05-N15-R, S05-N17-R, S04-N16-R, S06-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N17-DDiagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the information field: to measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N17-K, S05-N17-R, S05-N16-D, S05-N18-D, S04-N17-D, S06-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N17-KCoordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N17-D, S05-N17-R, S05-N16-K, S05-N18-K, S04-N17-K, S06-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N17-D, S05-N17-K, S05-N16-R, S05-N18-R, S04-N17-R, S06-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N18-DDiagnosis of the node "Environment" in the contour of the information field: to measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N18-K, S05-N18-R, S05-N17-D, S05-N19-D, S04-N18-D, S06-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N18-KCoordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N18-D, S05-N18-R, S05-N17-K, S05-N19-K, S04-N18-K, S06-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N18-RDevelopment of the "Environment" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N18-D, S05-N18-K, S05-N17-R, S05-N19-R, S04-N18-R, S06-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S05-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the information field: to measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS05-N19-K, S05-N19-R, S05-N18-D, S04-N19-D, S06-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S05-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS05-N19-D, S05-N19-R, S05-N18-K, S04-N19-K, S06-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S05-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS05-N19-D, S05-N19-K, S05-N18-R, S04-N19-R, S06-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S06 · Man and Consciousness

The function of the family: human potential, competence, perception and learning. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S06-N01-DDiagnosis of the subject node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N01-K, S06-N01-R, S06-N02-D, S05-N01-D, S07-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N01-KCoordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N01-D, S06-N01-R, S06-N02-K, S05-N01-K, S07-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N01-RThe development of the subject node in the human field contour: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N01-D, S06-N01-K, S06-N02-R, S05-N01-R, S07-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N02-DDiagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N02-K, S06-N02-R, S06-N01-D, S06-N03-D, S05-N02-D, S07-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N02-KCoordination of the "Purpose" node in the human field contour: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N02-D, S06-N02-R, S06-N01-K, S06-N03-K, S05-N02-K, S07-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N02-RThe development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N02-D, S06-N02-K, S06-N01-R, S06-N03-R, S05-N02-R, S07-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N03-K, S06-N03-R, S06-N02-D, S06-N04-D, S05-N03-D, S07-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N03-D, S06-N03-R, S06-N02-K, S06-N04-K, S05-N03-K, S07-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N03-D, S06-N03-K, S06-N02-R, S06-N04-R, S05-N03-R, S07-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N04-K, S06-N04-R, S06-N03-D, S06-N05-D, S05-N04-D, S07-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N04-D, S06-N04-R, S06-N03-K, S06-N05-K, S05-N04-K, S07-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N04-D, S06-N04-K, S06-N03-R, S06-N05-R, S05-N04-R, S07-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N05-K, S06-N05-R, S06-N04-D, S06-N06-D, S05-N05-D, S07-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N05-KCoordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N05-D, S06-N05-R, S06-N04-K, S06-N06-K, S05-N05-K, S07-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N05-D, S06-N05-K, S06-N04-R, S06-N06-R, S05-N05-R, S07-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N06-DDiagnostics of the Knowledge node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N06-K, S06-N06-R, S06-N05-D, S06-N07-D, S05-N06-D, S07-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N06-KCoordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N06-D, S06-N06-R, S06-N05-K, S06-N07-K, S05-N06-K, S07-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the human field contour: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N06-D, S06-N06-K, S06-N05-R, S06-N07-R, S05-N06-R, S07-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N07-DDiagnostics of the "Solution" node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N07-K, S06-N07-R, S06-N06-D, S06-N08-D, S05-N07-D, S07-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N07-KCoordination of the "Solution" node in the human field contour: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N07-D, S06-N07-R, S06-N06-K, S06-N08-K, S05-N07-K, S07-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N07-RDevelopment of the “Solution” node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N07-D, S06-N07-K, S06-N06-R, S06-N08-R, S05-N07-R, S07-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N08-DDiagnostics of the "Action" node in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N08-K, S06-N08-R, S06-N07-D, S06-N09-D, S05-N08-D, S07-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N08-KCoordination of the "Action" node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N08-D, S06-N08-R, S06-N07-K, S06-N09-K, S05-N08-K, S07-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the human field contour: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N08-D, S06-N08-K, S06-N07-R, S06-N09-R, S05-N08-R, S07-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N09-DDiagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the human field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N09-K, S06-N09-R, S06-N08-D, S06-N10-D, S05-N09-D, S07-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N09-D, S06-N09-R, S06-N08-K, S06-N10-K, S05-N09-K, S07-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the human field contour: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N09-D, S06-N09-K, S06-N08-R, S06-N10-R, S05-N09-R, S07-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N10-DDiagnosis of the risk node in the human field contour: measure current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N10-K, S06-N10-R, S06-N09-D, S06-N11-D, S05-N10-D, S07-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N10-KCoordination of the Risk node in the human field contour: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N10-D, S06-N10-R, S06-N09-K, S06-N11-K, S05-N10-K, S07-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the human field contour: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N10-D, S06-N10-K, S06-N09-R, S06-N11-R, S05-N10-R, S07-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N11-K, S06-N11-R, S06-N10-D, S06-N12-D, S05-N11-D, S07-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N11-KCoordination of the "Trust" node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N11-D, S06-N11-R, S06-N10-K, S06-N12-K, S05-N11-K, S07-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N11-RThe development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N11-D, S06-N11-K, S06-N10-R, S06-N12-R, S05-N11-R, S07-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N12-DDiagnosis of the "Cooperation" node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N12-K, S06-N12-R, S06-N11-D, S06-N13-D, S05-N12-D, S07-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N12-KCoordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N12-D, S06-N12-R, S06-N11-K, S06-N13-K, S05-N12-K, S07-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N12-D, S06-N12-K, S06-N11-R, S06-N13-R, S05-N12-R, S07-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N13-DDiagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N13-K, S06-N13-R, S06-N12-D, S06-N14-D, S05-N13-D, S07-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N13-KCoordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N13-D, S06-N13-R, S06-N12-K, S06-N14-K, S05-N13-K, S07-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N13-RThe development of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N13-D, S06-N13-K, S06-N12-R, S06-N14-R, S05-N13-R, S07-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N14-DDiagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N14-K, S06-N14-R, S06-N13-D, S06-N15-D, S05-N14-D, S07-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N14-KCoordination of the “Standard” node in the human field contour: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N14-D, S06-N14-R, S06-N13-K, S06-N15-K, S05-N14-K, S07-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N14-RThe development of the “Standard” node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N14-D, S06-N14-K, S06-N13-R, S06-N15-R, S05-N14-R, S07-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N15-DDiagnosis of the "Finance" node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N15-K, S06-N15-R, S06-N14-D, S06-N16-D, S05-N15-D, S07-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N15-D, S06-N15-R, S06-N14-K, S06-N16-K, S05-N15-K, S07-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N15-RDevelopment of the "Finance" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N15-D, S06-N15-K, S06-N14-R, S06-N16-R, S05-N15-R, S07-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N16-DDiagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N16-K, S06-N16-R, S06-N15-D, S06-N17-D, S05-N16-D, S07-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the human field contour: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N16-D, S06-N16-R, S06-N15-K, S06-N17-K, S05-N16-K, S07-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N16-RThe development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N16-D, S06-N16-K, S06-N15-R, S06-N17-R, S05-N16-R, S07-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N17-DDiagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N17-K, S06-N17-R, S06-N16-D, S06-N18-D, S05-N17-D, S07-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N17-KCoordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N17-D, S06-N17-R, S06-N16-K, S06-N18-K, S05-N17-K, S07-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N17-D, S06-N17-K, S06-N16-R, S06-N18-R, S05-N17-R, S07-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N18-DDiagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N18-K, S06-N18-R, S06-N17-D, S06-N19-D, S05-N18-D, S07-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N18-KCoordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N18-D, S06-N18-R, S06-N17-K, S06-N19-K, S05-N18-K, S07-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N18-RThe development of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N18-D, S06-N18-K, S06-N17-R, S06-N19-R, S05-N18-R, S07-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S06-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the human field: measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS06-N19-K, S06-N19-R, S06-N18-D, S05-N19-D, S07-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S06-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS06-N19-D, S06-N19-R, S06-N18-K, S05-N19-K, S07-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S06-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS06-N19-D, S06-N19-K, S06-N18-R, S05-N19-R, S07-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S07 · Cooperation and Networks

The function of the family: connectivity, trust, contracts and networking. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S07-N01-DDiagnostics of the "Subject" node in the cooperative field contour: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N01-K, S07-N01-R, S07-N02-D, S06-N01-D, S08-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N01-KCoordination of the "Subject" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N01-D, S07-N01-R, S07-N02-K, S06-N01-K, S08-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N01-RDevelopment of the subject node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N01-D, S07-N01-K, S07-N02-R, S06-N01-R, S08-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N02-DDiagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the cooperative field contour: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N02-K, S07-N02-R, S07-N01-D, S07-N03-D, S06-N02-D, S08-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N02-KCoordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N02-D, S07-N02-R, S07-N01-K, S07-N03-K, S06-N02-K, S08-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N02-RDevelopment of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N02-D, S07-N02-K, S07-N01-R, S07-N03-R, S06-N02-R, S08-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N03-K, S07-N03-R, S07-N02-D, S07-N04-D, S06-N03-D, S08-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N03-D, S07-N03-R, S07-N02-K, S07-N04-K, S06-N03-K, S08-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N03-D, S07-N03-K, S07-N02-R, S07-N04-R, S06-N03-R, S08-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N04-K, S07-N04-R, S07-N03-D, S07-N05-D, S06-N04-D, S08-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N04-D, S07-N04-R, S07-N03-K, S07-N05-K, S06-N04-K, S08-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N04-D, S07-N04-K, S07-N03-R, S07-N05-R, S06-N04-R, S08-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the cooperative field contour: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N05-K, S07-N05-R, S07-N04-D, S07-N06-D, S06-N05-D, S08-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N05-KCoordination of the "Signal" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N05-D, S07-N05-R, S07-N04-K, S07-N06-K, S06-N05-K, S08-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N05-D, S07-N05-K, S07-N04-R, S07-N06-R, S06-N05-R, S08-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N06-DDiagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N06-K, S07-N06-R, S07-N05-D, S07-N07-D, S06-N06-D, S08-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N06-KCoordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the cooperation field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N06-D, S07-N06-R, S07-N05-K, S07-N07-K, S06-N06-K, S08-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N06-D, S07-N06-K, S07-N05-R, S07-N07-R, S06-N06-R, S08-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N07-DDiagnostics of the node "Solution" in the contour of the cooperative field: measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N07-K, S07-N07-R, S07-N06-D, S07-N08-D, S06-N07-D, S08-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N07-KCoordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the cooperation field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N07-D, S07-N07-R, S07-N06-K, S07-N08-K, S06-N07-K, S08-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N07-RDevelopment of the "Solution" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N07-D, S07-N07-K, S07-N06-R, S07-N08-R, S06-N07-R, S08-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N08-DDiagnostics of the "Action" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N08-K, S07-N08-R, S07-N07-D, S07-N09-D, S06-N08-D, S08-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N08-KCoordination of the "Action" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N08-D, S07-N08-R, S07-N07-K, S07-N09-K, S06-N08-K, S08-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N08-D, S07-N08-K, S07-N07-R, S07-N09-R, S06-N08-R, S08-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N09-DDiagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N09-K, S07-N09-R, S07-N08-D, S07-N10-D, S06-N09-D, S08-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N09-D, S07-N09-R, S07-N08-K, S07-N10-K, S06-N09-K, S08-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N09-D, S07-N09-K, S07-N08-R, S07-N10-R, S06-N09-R, S08-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N10-DDiagnosis of the Risk node in the cooperative field contour: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N10-K, S07-N10-R, S07-N09-D, S07-N11-D, S06-N10-D, S08-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N10-KCoordination of the Risk node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N10-D, S07-N10-R, S07-N09-K, S07-N11-K, S06-N10-K, S08-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N10-D, S07-N10-K, S07-N09-R, S07-N11-R, S06-N10-R, S08-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N11-K, S07-N11-R, S07-N10-D, S07-N12-D, S06-N11-D, S08-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N11-KCoordination of the "Trust" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N11-D, S07-N11-R, S07-N10-K, S07-N12-K, S06-N11-K, S08-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N11-RDevelopment of the "Trust" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N11-D, S07-N11-K, S07-N10-R, S07-N12-R, S06-N11-R, S08-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N12-DDiagnosis of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N12-K, S07-N12-R, S07-N11-D, S07-N13-D, S06-N12-D, S08-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N12-KCoordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N12-D, S07-N12-R, S07-N11-K, S07-N13-K, S06-N12-K, S08-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N12-D, S07-N12-K, S07-N11-R, S07-N13-R, S06-N12-R, S08-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N13-DDiagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N13-K, S07-N13-R, S07-N12-D, S07-N14-D, S06-N13-D, S08-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N13-KCoordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N13-D, S07-N13-R, S07-N12-K, S07-N14-K, S06-N13-K, S08-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N13-RDevelopment of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N13-D, S07-N13-K, S07-N12-R, S07-N14-R, S06-N13-R, S08-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N14-DDiagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N14-K, S07-N14-R, S07-N13-D, S07-N15-D, S06-N14-D, S08-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N14-KCoordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N14-D, S07-N14-R, S07-N13-K, S07-N15-K, S06-N14-K, S08-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N14-RDevelopment of the Standard node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N14-D, S07-N14-K, S07-N13-R, S07-N15-R, S06-N14-R, S08-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N15-DDiagnosis of the "Finance" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N15-K, S07-N15-R, S07-N14-D, S07-N16-D, S06-N15-D, S08-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N15-D, S07-N15-R, S07-N14-K, S07-N16-K, S06-N15-K, S08-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N15-RDevelopment of the "Finance" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N15-D, S07-N15-K, S07-N14-R, S07-N16-R, S06-N15-R, S08-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N16-DDiagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N16-K, S07-N16-R, S07-N15-D, S07-N17-D, S06-N16-D, S08-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N16-D, S07-N16-R, S07-N15-K, S07-N17-K, S06-N16-K, S08-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N16-RDevelopment of the Personnel node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N16-D, S07-N16-K, S07-N15-R, S07-N17-R, S06-N16-R, S08-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N17-DDiagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N17-K, S07-N17-R, S07-N16-D, S07-N18-D, S06-N17-D, S08-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N17-KCoordination of the "Technology" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N17-D, S07-N17-R, S07-N16-K, S07-N18-K, S06-N17-K, S08-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N17-D, S07-N17-K, S07-N16-R, S07-N18-R, S06-N17-R, S08-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N18-DDiagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the cooperative field: measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N18-K, S07-N18-R, S07-N17-D, S07-N19-D, S06-N18-D, S08-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N18-KCoordination of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N18-D, S07-N18-R, S07-N17-K, S07-N19-K, S06-N18-K, S08-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N18-RDevelopment of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N18-D, S07-N18-K, S07-N17-R, S07-N19-R, S06-N18-R, S08-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S07-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS07-N19-K, S07-N19-R, S07-N18-D, S06-N19-D, S08-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S07-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the cooperation field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS07-N19-D, S07-N19-R, S07-N18-K, S06-N19-K, S08-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S07-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS07-N19-D, S07-N19-K, S07-N18-R, S06-N19-R, S08-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S08 · Balance and sustainability

Family Function: Balance, Resilience, Adaptation and Recovery. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S08-N01-DDiagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N01-K, S08-N01-R, S08-N02-D, S07-N01-D, S09-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N01-KCoordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of a stable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N01-D, S08-N01-R, S08-N02-K, S07-N01-K, S09-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N01-RDevelopment of the subject node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N01-D, S08-N01-K, S08-N02-R, S07-N01-R, S09-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N02-DDiagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N02-K, S08-N02-R, S08-N01-D, S08-N03-D, S07-N02-D, S09-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N02-KCoordination of the “Purpose” node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N02-D, S08-N02-R, S08-N01-K, S08-N03-K, S07-N02-K, S09-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N02-RThe development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N02-D, S08-N02-K, S08-N01-R, S08-N03-R, S07-N02-R, S09-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N03-K, S08-N03-R, S08-N02-D, S08-N04-D, S07-N03-D, S09-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of a stable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N03-D, S08-N03-R, S08-N02-K, S08-N04-K, S07-N03-K, S09-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N03-D, S08-N03-K, S08-N02-R, S08-N04-R, S07-N03-R, S09-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N04-K, S08-N04-R, S08-N03-D, S08-N05-D, S07-N04-D, S09-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N04-D, S08-N04-R, S08-N03-K, S08-N05-K, S07-N04-K, S09-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N04-D, S08-N04-K, S08-N03-R, S08-N05-R, S07-N04-R, S09-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the stable field: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N05-K, S08-N05-R, S08-N04-D, S08-N06-D, S07-N05-D, S09-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N05-KCoordination of the Signal node in the contour of a stable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N05-D, S08-N05-R, S08-N04-K, S08-N06-K, S07-N05-K, S09-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N05-D, S08-N05-K, S08-N04-R, S08-N06-R, S07-N05-R, S09-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N06-DDiagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N06-K, S08-N06-R, S08-N05-D, S08-N07-D, S07-N06-D, S09-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N06-KCoordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of a stable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N06-D, S08-N06-R, S08-N05-K, S08-N07-K, S07-N06-K, S09-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N06-D, S08-N06-K, S08-N05-R, S08-N07-R, S07-N06-R, S09-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N07-DDiagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N07-K, S08-N07-R, S08-N06-D, S08-N08-D, S07-N07-D, S09-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N07-KCoordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of a stable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N07-D, S08-N07-R, S08-N06-K, S08-N08-K, S07-N07-K, S09-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N07-RDevelopment of the "Solution" node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N07-D, S08-N07-K, S08-N06-R, S08-N08-R, S07-N07-R, S09-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N08-DDiagnostics of the Action node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N08-K, S08-N08-R, S08-N07-D, S08-N09-D, S07-N08-D, S09-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N08-KCoordination of the Action node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N08-D, S08-N08-R, S08-N07-K, S08-N09-K, S07-N08-K, S09-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N08-D, S08-N08-K, S08-N07-R, S08-N09-R, S07-N08-R, S09-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N09-DDiagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N09-K, S08-N09-R, S08-N08-D, S08-N10-D, S07-N09-D, S09-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N09-KCoordination of the feedback node in the contour of a stable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N09-D, S08-N09-R, S08-N08-K, S08-N10-K, S07-N09-K, S09-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N09-D, S08-N09-K, S08-N08-R, S08-N10-R, S07-N09-R, S09-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N10-DDiagnosis of the Risk node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N10-K, S08-N10-R, S08-N09-D, S08-N11-D, S07-N10-D, S09-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N10-KCoordination of the Risk node in the contour of a stable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N10-D, S08-N10-R, S08-N09-K, S08-N11-K, S07-N10-K, S09-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N10-D, S08-N10-K, S08-N09-R, S08-N11-R, S07-N10-R, S09-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N11-K, S08-N11-R, S08-N10-D, S08-N12-D, S07-N11-D, S09-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N11-KCoordination of the “Trust” node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N11-D, S08-N11-R, S08-N10-K, S08-N12-K, S07-N11-K, S09-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N11-RThe development of the “Trust” node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N11-D, S08-N11-K, S08-N10-R, S08-N12-R, S07-N11-R, S09-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N12-DDiagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N12-K, S08-N12-R, S08-N11-D, S08-N13-D, S07-N12-D, S09-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N12-KCoordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N12-D, S08-N12-R, S08-N11-K, S08-N13-K, S07-N12-K, S09-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N12-D, S08-N12-K, S08-N11-R, S08-N13-R, S07-N12-R, S09-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N13-DDiagnostics of the Infrastructure node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N13-K, S08-N13-R, S08-N12-D, S08-N14-D, S07-N13-D, S09-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N13-KCoordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N13-D, S08-N13-R, S08-N12-K, S08-N14-K, S07-N13-K, S09-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N13-RDevelopment of the Infrastructure node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N13-D, S08-N13-K, S08-N12-R, S08-N14-R, S07-N13-R, S09-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N14-DDiagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N14-K, S08-N14-R, S08-N13-D, S08-N15-D, S07-N14-D, S09-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N14-KCoordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of a sustainable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N14-D, S08-N14-R, S08-N13-K, S08-N15-K, S07-N14-K, S09-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N14-RDevelopment of the Standard node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N14-D, S08-N14-K, S08-N13-R, S08-N15-R, S07-N14-R, S09-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N15-DDiagnostics of the Finance node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N15-K, S08-N15-R, S08-N14-D, S08-N16-D, S07-N15-D, S09-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N15-D, S08-N15-R, S08-N14-K, S08-N16-K, S07-N15-K, S09-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N15-RDevelopment of the Finance node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N15-D, S08-N15-K, S08-N14-R, S08-N16-R, S07-N15-R, S09-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N16-DDiagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N16-K, S08-N16-R, S08-N15-D, S08-N17-D, S07-N16-D, S09-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of a stable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N16-D, S08-N16-R, S08-N15-K, S08-N17-K, S07-N16-K, S09-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N16-RThe development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N16-D, S08-N16-K, S08-N15-R, S08-N17-R, S07-N16-R, S09-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N17-DDiagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N17-K, S08-N17-R, S08-N16-D, S08-N18-D, S07-N17-D, S09-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N17-KCoordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of a sustainable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N17-D, S08-N17-R, S08-N16-K, S08-N18-K, S07-N17-K, S09-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N17-D, S08-N17-K, S08-N16-R, S08-N18-R, S07-N17-R, S09-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N18-DDiagnosis of the node "Environment" in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N18-K, S08-N18-R, S08-N17-D, S08-N19-D, S07-N18-D, S09-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N18-KCoordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of a stable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N18-D, S08-N18-R, S08-N17-K, S08-N19-K, S07-N18-K, S09-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N18-RDevelopment of the node "Environment" in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N18-D, S08-N18-K, S08-N17-R, S08-N19-R, S07-N18-R, S09-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S08-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS08-N19-K, S08-N19-R, S08-N18-D, S07-N19-D, S09-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S08-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of a stable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS08-N19-D, S08-N19-R, S08-N18-K, S07-N19-K, S09-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S08-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS08-N19-D, S08-N19-K, S08-N18-R, S07-N19-R, S09-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S09 · Evolution and innovation

Family function: updating, experimentation, R&D, and scaling. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S09-N01-DDiagnosis of the subject node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N01-K, S09-N01-R, S09-N02-D, S08-N01-D, S10-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N01-KCoordination of the subject node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N01-D, S09-N01-R, S09-N02-K, S08-N01-K, S10-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N01-RDevelopment of the subject node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N01-D, S09-N01-K, S09-N02-R, S08-N01-R, S10-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N02-DDiagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N02-K, S09-N02-R, S09-N01-D, S09-N03-D, S08-N02-D, S10-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N02-KCoordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N02-D, S09-N02-R, S09-N01-K, S09-N03-K, S08-N02-K, S10-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N02-RThe development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N02-D, S09-N02-K, S09-N01-R, S09-N03-R, S08-N02-R, S10-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N03-K, S09-N03-R, S09-N02-D, S09-N04-D, S08-N03-D, S10-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N03-KCoordination of the "Border" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N03-D, S09-N03-R, S09-N02-K, S09-N04-K, S08-N03-K, S10-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N03-D, S09-N03-K, S09-N02-R, S09-N04-R, S08-N03-R, S10-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N04-K, S09-N04-R, S09-N03-D, S09-N05-D, S08-N04-D, S10-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N04-D, S09-N04-R, S09-N03-K, S09-N05-K, S08-N04-K, S10-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N04-D, S09-N04-K, S09-N03-R, S09-N05-R, S08-N04-R, S10-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N05-DDiagnostics of the signal node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N05-K, S09-N05-R, S09-N04-D, S09-N06-D, S08-N05-D, S10-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N05-KCoordination of the Signal node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N05-D, S09-N05-R, S09-N04-K, S09-N06-K, S08-N05-K, S10-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N05-D, S09-N05-K, S09-N04-R, S09-N06-R, S08-N05-R, S10-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N06-DDiagnosis of the Knowledge node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N06-K, S09-N06-R, S09-N05-D, S09-N07-D, S08-N06-D, S10-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N06-KCoordination of the Knowledge node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N06-D, S09-N06-R, S09-N05-K, S09-N07-K, S08-N06-K, S10-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N06-D, S09-N06-K, S09-N05-R, S09-N07-R, S08-N06-R, S10-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N07-DDiagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N07-K, S09-N07-R, S09-N06-D, S09-N08-D, S08-N07-D, S10-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N07-KCoordination of the “Solution” node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N07-D, S09-N07-R, S09-N06-K, S09-N08-K, S08-N07-K, S10-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N07-RDevelopment of the “Solution” node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N07-D, S09-N07-K, S09-N06-R, S09-N08-R, S08-N07-R, S10-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N08-DDiagnostics of the "Action" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N08-K, S09-N08-R, S09-N07-D, S09-N09-D, S08-N08-D, S10-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N08-KCoordination of the "Action" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints, and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N08-D, S09-N08-R, S09-N07-K, S09-N09-K, S08-N08-K, S10-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N08-D, S09-N08-K, S09-N07-R, S09-N09-R, S08-N08-R, S10-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N09-DDiagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N09-K, S09-N09-R, S09-N08-D, S09-N10-D, S08-N09-D, S10-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N09-D, S09-N09-R, S09-N08-K, S09-N10-K, S08-N09-K, S10-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N09-D, S09-N09-K, S09-N08-R, S09-N10-R, S08-N09-R, S10-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N10-DDiagnosis of the risk node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N10-K, S09-N10-R, S09-N09-D, S09-N11-D, S08-N10-D, S10-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N10-KCoordination of the node "Risk" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N10-D, S09-N10-R, S09-N09-K, S09-N11-K, S08-N10-K, S10-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N10-D, S09-N10-K, S09-N09-R, S09-N11-R, S08-N10-R, S10-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N11-K, S09-N11-R, S09-N10-D, S09-N12-D, S08-N11-D, S10-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N11-KCoordination of the node "Trust" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N11-D, S09-N11-R, S09-N10-K, S09-N12-K, S08-N11-K, S10-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N11-RThe development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N11-D, S09-N11-K, S09-N10-R, S09-N12-R, S08-N11-R, S10-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N12-DDiagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N12-K, S09-N12-R, S09-N11-D, S09-N13-D, S08-N12-D, S10-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N12-KCoordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N12-D, S09-N12-R, S09-N11-K, S09-N13-K, S08-N12-K, S10-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N12-D, S09-N12-K, S09-N11-R, S09-N13-R, S08-N12-R, S10-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N13-DDiagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N13-K, S09-N13-R, S09-N12-D, S09-N14-D, S08-N13-D, S10-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N13-KCoordination of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, constraints and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N13-D, S09-N13-R, S09-N12-K, S09-N14-K, S08-N13-K, S10-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N13-RDevelopment of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N13-D, S09-N13-K, S09-N12-R, S09-N14-R, S08-N13-R, S10-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N14-DDiagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N14-K, S09-N14-R, S09-N13-D, S09-N15-D, S08-N14-D, S10-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N14-KCoordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N14-D, S09-N14-R, S09-N13-K, S09-N15-K, S08-N14-K, S10-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N14-RDevelopment of the Standard node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N14-D, S09-N14-K, S09-N13-R, S09-N15-R, S08-N14-R, S10-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N15-DDiagnosis of the "Finance" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N15-K, S09-N15-R, S09-N14-D, S09-N16-D, S08-N15-D, S10-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N15-D, S09-N15-R, S09-N14-K, S09-N16-K, S08-N15-K, S10-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N15-RDevelopment of the "Finance" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N15-D, S09-N15-K, S09-N14-R, S09-N16-R, S08-N15-R, S10-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N16-DDiagnosis of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N16-K, S09-N16-R, S09-N15-D, S09-N17-D, S08-N16-D, S10-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N16-D, S09-N16-R, S09-N15-K, S09-N17-K, S08-N16-K, S10-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N16-RDevelopment of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N16-D, S09-N16-K, S09-N15-R, S09-N17-R, S08-N16-R, S10-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N17-DDiagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N17-K, S09-N17-R, S09-N16-D, S09-N18-D, S08-N17-D, S10-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N17-KCoordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N17-D, S09-N17-R, S09-N16-K, S09-N18-K, S08-N17-K, S10-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N17-RDevelopment of the node "Technology" in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N17-D, S09-N17-K, S09-N16-R, S09-N18-R, S08-N17-R, S10-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N18-DDiagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N18-K, S09-N18-R, S09-N17-D, S09-N19-D, S08-N18-D, S10-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N18-KCoordination of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N18-D, S09-N18-R, S09-N17-K, S09-N19-K, S08-N18-K, S10-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N18-RDevelopment of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N18-D, S09-N18-K, S09-N17-R, S09-N19-R, S08-N18-R, S10-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S09-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS09-N19-K, S09-N19-R, S09-N18-D, S08-N19-D, S10-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S09-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS09-N19-D, S09-N19-R, S09-N18-K, S08-N19-K, S10-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S09-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS09-N19-D, S09-N19-K, S09-N18-R, S08-N19-R, S10-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S10 · Creation and production

Family function: value creation, production, services and execution infrastructure. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S10-N01-DDiagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N01-K, S10-N01-R, S10-N02-D, S09-N01-D, S11-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N01-KCoordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N01-D, S10-N01-R, S10-N02-K, S09-N01-K, S11-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N01-RDevelopment of the subject node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N01-D, S10-N01-K, S10-N02-R, S09-N01-R, S11-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N02-DDiagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N02-K, S10-N02-R, S10-N01-D, S10-N03-D, S09-N02-D, S11-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N02-KCoordination of the “Purpose” node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N02-D, S10-N02-R, S10-N01-K, S10-N03-K, S09-N02-K, S11-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N02-RThe development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N02-D, S10-N02-K, S10-N01-R, S10-N03-R, S09-N02-R, S11-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N03-K, S10-N03-R, S10-N02-D, S10-N04-D, S09-N03-D, S11-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N03-D, S10-N03-R, S10-N02-K, S10-N04-K, S09-N03-K, S11-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N03-D, S10-N03-K, S10-N02-R, S10-N04-R, S09-N03-R, S11-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N04-K, S10-N04-R, S10-N03-D, S10-N05-D, S09-N04-D, S11-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N04-D, S10-N04-R, S10-N03-K, S10-N05-K, S09-N04-K, S11-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N04-D, S10-N04-K, S10-N03-R, S10-N05-R, S09-N04-R, S11-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N05-K, S10-N05-R, S10-N04-D, S10-N06-D, S09-N05-D, S11-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N05-KCoordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N05-D, S10-N05-R, S10-N04-K, S10-N06-K, S09-N05-K, S11-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N05-D, S10-N05-K, S10-N04-R, S10-N06-R, S09-N05-R, S11-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N06-DDiagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N06-K, S10-N06-R, S10-N05-D, S10-N07-D, S09-N06-D, S11-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N06-KCoordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N06-D, S10-N06-R, S10-N05-K, S10-N07-K, S09-N06-K, S11-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N06-D, S10-N06-K, S10-N05-R, S10-N07-R, S09-N06-R, S11-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N07-DDiagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N07-K, S10-N07-R, S10-N06-D, S10-N08-D, S09-N07-D, S11-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N07-KCoordination of the “Solution” node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N07-D, S10-N07-R, S10-N06-K, S10-N08-K, S09-N07-K, S11-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N07-RDevelopment of the “Solution” node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N07-D, S10-N07-K, S10-N06-R, S10-N08-R, S09-N07-R, S11-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N08-DDiagnostics of the "Action" node in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N08-K, S10-N08-R, S10-N07-D, S10-N09-D, S09-N08-D, S11-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N08-KCoordination of the Action node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N08-D, S10-N08-R, S10-N07-K, S10-N09-K, S09-N08-K, S11-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N08-D, S10-N08-K, S10-N07-R, S10-N09-R, S09-N08-R, S11-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N09-DDiagnostics of the feedback node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N09-K, S10-N09-R, S10-N08-D, S10-N10-D, S09-N09-D, S11-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N09-D, S10-N09-R, S10-N08-K, S10-N10-K, S09-N09-K, S11-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N09-D, S10-N09-K, S10-N08-R, S10-N10-R, S09-N09-R, S11-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N10-DDiagnostics of the Risk node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N10-K, S10-N10-R, S10-N09-D, S10-N11-D, S09-N10-D, S11-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N10-KCoordination of the node "Risk" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N10-D, S10-N10-R, S10-N09-K, S10-N11-K, S09-N10-K, S11-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N10-D, S10-N10-K, S10-N09-R, S10-N11-R, S09-N10-R, S11-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N11-K, S10-N11-R, S10-N10-D, S10-N12-D, S09-N11-D, S11-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N11-KCoordination of the “Trust” node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N11-D, S10-N11-R, S10-N10-K, S10-N12-K, S09-N11-K, S11-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N11-RThe development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N11-D, S10-N11-K, S10-N10-R, S10-N12-R, S09-N11-R, S11-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N12-DDiagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N12-K, S10-N12-R, S10-N11-D, S10-N13-D, S09-N12-D, S11-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N12-KCoordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N12-D, S10-N12-R, S10-N11-K, S10-N13-K, S09-N12-K, S11-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N12-D, S10-N12-K, S10-N11-R, S10-N13-R, S09-N12-R, S11-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N13-DDiagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N13-K, S10-N13-R, S10-N12-D, S10-N14-D, S09-N13-D, S11-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N13-KCoordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N13-D, S10-N13-R, S10-N12-K, S10-N14-K, S09-N13-K, S11-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N13-RDevelopment of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N13-D, S10-N13-K, S10-N12-R, S10-N14-R, S09-N13-R, S11-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N14-DDiagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N14-K, S10-N14-R, S10-N13-D, S10-N15-D, S09-N14-D, S11-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N14-KCoordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N14-D, S10-N14-R, S10-N13-K, S10-N15-K, S09-N14-K, S11-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N14-RDevelopment of the Standard node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N14-D, S10-N14-K, S10-N13-R, S10-N15-R, S09-N14-R, S11-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N15-DDiagnostics of the "Finance" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N15-K, S10-N15-R, S10-N14-D, S10-N16-D, S09-N15-D, S11-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N15-D, S10-N15-R, S10-N14-K, S10-N16-K, S09-N15-K, S11-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N15-RDevelopment of the “Finance” node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N15-D, S10-N15-K, S10-N14-R, S10-N16-R, S09-N15-R, S11-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N16-DDiagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N16-K, S10-N16-R, S10-N15-D, S10-N17-D, S09-N16-D, S11-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N16-D, S10-N16-R, S10-N15-K, S10-N17-K, S09-N16-K, S11-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N16-RDevelopment of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N16-D, S10-N16-K, S10-N15-R, S10-N17-R, S09-N16-R, S11-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N17-DDiagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N17-K, S10-N17-R, S10-N16-D, S10-N18-D, S09-N17-D, S11-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N17-KCoordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N17-D, S10-N17-R, S10-N16-K, S10-N18-K, S09-N17-K, S11-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N17-D, S10-N17-K, S10-N16-R, S10-N18-R, S09-N17-R, S11-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N18-DDiagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N18-K, S10-N18-R, S10-N17-D, S10-N19-D, S09-N18-D, S11-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N18-KCoordination of the “Wednesday” node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N18-D, S10-N18-R, S10-N17-K, S10-N19-K, S09-N18-K, S11-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N18-RDevelopment of the “Wednesday” node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N18-D, S10-N18-K, S10-N17-R, S10-N19-R, S09-N18-R, S11-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S10-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS10-N19-K, S10-N19-R, S10-N18-D, S09-N19-D, S11-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S10-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS10-N19-D, S10-N19-R, S10-N18-K, S09-N19-K, S11-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S10-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS10-N19-D, S10-N19-K, S10-N18-R, S09-N19-R, S11-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S11 · Navigation and strategy

Family function: priorities, routes, portfolios and strategic choices. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S11-N01-DDiagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N01-K, S11-N01-R, S11-N02-D, S10-N01-D, S12-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N01-KCoordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N01-D, S11-N01-R, S11-N02-K, S10-N01-K, S12-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N01-RDevelopment of the subject node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N01-D, S11-N01-K, S11-N02-R, S10-N01-R, S12-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N02-DDiagnostics of the Target node in the strategic field contour: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N02-K, S11-N02-R, S11-N01-D, S11-N03-D, S10-N02-D, S12-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N02-KCoordination of the “Purpose” node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N02-D, S11-N02-R, S11-N01-K, S11-N03-K, S10-N02-K, S12-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N02-RThe development of the “Target” node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N02-D, S11-N02-K, S11-N01-R, S11-N03-R, S10-N02-R, S12-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N03-K, S11-N03-R, S11-N02-D, S11-N04-D, S10-N03-D, S12-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N03-D, S11-N03-R, S11-N02-K, S11-N04-K, S10-N03-K, S12-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N03-D, S11-N03-K, S11-N02-R, S11-N04-R, S10-N03-R, S12-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N04-K, S11-N04-R, S11-N03-D, S11-N05-D, S10-N04-D, S12-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N04-D, S11-N04-R, S11-N03-K, S11-N05-K, S10-N04-K, S12-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N04-D, S11-N04-K, S11-N03-R, S11-N05-R, S10-N04-R, S12-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the outline of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N05-K, S11-N05-R, S11-N04-D, S11-N06-D, S10-N05-D, S12-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N05-KCoordination of the Signal node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N05-D, S11-N05-R, S11-N04-K, S11-N06-K, S10-N05-K, S12-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N05-D, S11-N05-K, S11-N04-R, S11-N06-R, S10-N05-R, S12-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N06-DDiagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N06-K, S11-N06-R, S11-N05-D, S11-N07-D, S10-N06-D, S12-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N06-KCoordination of the Knowledge node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N06-D, S11-N06-R, S11-N05-K, S11-N07-K, S10-N06-K, S12-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N06-D, S11-N06-K, S11-N05-R, S11-N07-R, S10-N06-R, S12-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N07-DDiagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N07-K, S11-N07-R, S11-N06-D, S11-N08-D, S10-N07-D, S12-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N07-KCoordination of the “Solution” node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N07-D, S11-N07-R, S11-N06-K, S11-N08-K, S10-N07-K, S12-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N07-RDevelopment of the “Solution” node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N07-D, S11-N07-K, S11-N06-R, S11-N08-R, S10-N07-R, S12-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N08-DDiagnostics of the Action node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N08-K, S11-N08-R, S11-N07-D, S11-N09-D, S10-N08-D, S12-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N08-KCoordination of the Action node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N08-D, S11-N08-R, S11-N07-K, S11-N09-K, S10-N08-K, S12-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N08-D, S11-N08-K, S11-N07-R, S11-N09-R, S10-N08-R, S12-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N09-DDiagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N09-K, S11-N09-R, S11-N08-D, S11-N10-D, S10-N09-D, S12-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N09-D, S11-N09-R, S11-N08-K, S11-N10-K, S10-N09-K, S12-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N09-D, S11-N09-K, S11-N08-R, S11-N10-R, S10-N09-R, S12-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N10-DDiagnosis of the Risk node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N10-K, S11-N10-R, S11-N09-D, S11-N11-D, S10-N10-D, S12-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N10-KCoordination of the Risk node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N10-D, S11-N10-R, S11-N09-K, S11-N11-K, S10-N10-K, S12-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N10-D, S11-N10-K, S11-N09-R, S11-N11-R, S10-N10-R, S12-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N11-K, S11-N11-R, S11-N10-D, S11-N12-D, S10-N11-D, S12-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N11-KCoordination of the “Trust” node in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N11-D, S11-N11-R, S11-N10-K, S11-N12-K, S10-N11-K, S12-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N11-RThe development of the “Trust” node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N11-D, S11-N11-K, S11-N10-R, S11-N12-R, S10-N11-R, S12-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N12-DDiagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N12-K, S11-N12-R, S11-N11-D, S11-N13-D, S10-N12-D, S12-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N12-KCoordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N12-D, S11-N12-R, S11-N11-K, S11-N13-K, S10-N12-K, S12-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N12-RDevelopment of the cooperation node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N12-D, S11-N12-K, S11-N11-R, S11-N13-R, S10-N12-R, S12-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N13-DDiagnostics of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N13-K, S11-N13-R, S11-N12-D, S11-N14-D, S10-N13-D, S12-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N13-KCoordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N13-D, S11-N13-R, S11-N12-K, S11-N14-K, S10-N13-K, S12-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N13-RDevelopment of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N13-D, S11-N13-K, S11-N12-R, S11-N14-R, S10-N13-R, S12-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N14-DDiagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N14-K, S11-N14-R, S11-N13-D, S11-N15-D, S10-N14-D, S12-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N14-KCoordination of the “Standard” node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N14-D, S11-N14-R, S11-N13-K, S11-N15-K, S10-N14-K, S12-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N14-RDevelopment of the Standard node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N14-D, S11-N14-K, S11-N13-R, S11-N15-R, S10-N14-R, S12-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N15-DDiagnostics of the "Finance" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N15-K, S11-N15-R, S11-N14-D, S11-N16-D, S10-N15-D, S12-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N15-D, S11-N15-R, S11-N14-K, S11-N16-K, S10-N15-K, S12-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N15-RDevelopment of the Finance node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N15-D, S11-N15-K, S11-N14-R, S11-N16-R, S10-N15-R, S12-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N16-DDiagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N16-K, S11-N16-R, S11-N15-D, S11-N17-D, S10-N16-D, S12-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N16-D, S11-N16-R, S11-N15-K, S11-N17-K, S10-N16-K, S12-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N16-RDevelopment of the Personnel node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N16-D, S11-N16-K, S11-N15-R, S11-N17-R, S10-N16-R, S12-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N17-DDiagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N17-K, S11-N17-R, S11-N16-D, S11-N18-D, S10-N17-D, S12-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N17-KCoordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N17-D, S11-N17-R, S11-N16-K, S11-N18-K, S10-N17-K, S12-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of the strategic field: to change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N17-D, S11-N17-K, S11-N16-R, S11-N18-R, S10-N17-R, S12-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N18-DDiagnosis of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N18-K, S11-N18-R, S11-N17-D, S11-N19-D, S10-N18-D, S12-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N18-KCoordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N18-D, S11-N18-R, S11-N17-K, S11-N19-K, S10-N18-K, S12-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N18-RDevelopment of the “Environment” node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N18-D, S11-N18-K, S11-N17-R, S11-N19-R, S10-N18-R, S12-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S11-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS11-N19-K, S11-N19-R, S11-N18-D, S10-N19-D, S12-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S11-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS11-N19-D, S11-N19-R, S11-N18-K, S10-N19-K, S12-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S11-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the strategic field: to change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS11-N19-D, S11-N19-K, S11-N18-R, S10-N19-R, S12-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S12 · Life and Ecology

Family function: biocenoses, environment, ecosystem health and natural reproducibility. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S12-N01-DDiagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N01-K, S12-N01-R, S12-N02-D, S11-N01-D, S13-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N01-KCoordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N01-D, S12-N01-R, S12-N02-K, S11-N01-K, S13-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N01-RDevelopment of the subject node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N01-D, S12-N01-K, S12-N02-R, S11-N01-R, S13-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N02-DDiagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N02-K, S12-N02-R, S12-N01-D, S12-N03-D, S11-N02-D, S13-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N02-KCoordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N02-D, S12-N02-R, S12-N01-K, S12-N03-K, S11-N02-K, S13-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N02-RThe development of the "Target" node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N02-D, S12-N02-K, S12-N01-R, S12-N03-R, S11-N02-R, S13-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N03-K, S12-N03-R, S12-N02-D, S12-N04-D, S11-N03-D, S13-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N03-D, S12-N03-R, S12-N02-K, S12-N04-K, S11-N03-K, S13-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N03-D, S12-N03-K, S12-N02-R, S12-N04-R, S11-N03-R, S13-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N04-K, S12-N04-R, S12-N03-D, S12-N05-D, S11-N04-D, S13-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N04-D, S12-N04-R, S12-N03-K, S12-N05-K, S11-N04-K, S13-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N04-D, S12-N04-K, S12-N03-R, S12-N05-R, S11-N04-R, S13-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N05-K, S12-N05-R, S12-N04-D, S12-N06-D, S11-N05-D, S13-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N05-KCoordination of the signal node in the contour of the environmental field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N05-D, S12-N05-R, S12-N04-K, S12-N06-K, S11-N05-K, S13-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N05-D, S12-N05-K, S12-N04-R, S12-N06-R, S11-N05-R, S13-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N06-DDiagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N06-K, S12-N06-R, S12-N05-D, S12-N07-D, S11-N06-D, S13-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N06-KCoordination of the "Knowledge" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N06-D, S12-N06-R, S12-N05-K, S12-N07-K, S11-N06-K, S13-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N06-D, S12-N06-K, S12-N05-R, S12-N07-R, S11-N06-R, S13-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N07-DDiagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N07-K, S12-N07-R, S12-N06-D, S12-N08-D, S11-N07-D, S13-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N07-KCoordination of the "Solution" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N07-D, S12-N07-R, S12-N06-K, S12-N08-K, S11-N07-K, S13-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N07-RDevelopment of the "Solution" node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N07-D, S12-N07-K, S12-N06-R, S12-N08-R, S11-N07-R, S13-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N08-DDiagnostics of the Action node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N08-K, S12-N08-R, S12-N07-D, S12-N09-D, S11-N08-D, S13-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N08-KCoordination of the "Action" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N08-D, S12-N08-R, S12-N07-K, S12-N09-K, S11-N08-K, S13-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N08-D, S12-N08-K, S12-N07-R, S12-N09-R, S11-N08-R, S13-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N09-DDiagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N09-K, S12-N09-R, S12-N08-D, S12-N10-D, S11-N09-D, S13-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the environmental field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N09-D, S12-N09-R, S12-N08-K, S12-N10-K, S11-N09-K, S13-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N09-D, S12-N09-K, S12-N08-R, S12-N10-R, S11-N09-R, S13-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N10-DDiagnosis of the Risk node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N10-K, S12-N10-R, S12-N09-D, S12-N11-D, S11-N10-D, S13-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N10-KCoordination of the Risk node in the contour of the environmental field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N10-D, S12-N10-R, S12-N09-K, S12-N11-K, S11-N10-K, S13-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N10-D, S12-N10-K, S12-N09-R, S12-N11-R, S11-N10-R, S13-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N11-K, S12-N11-R, S12-N10-D, S12-N12-D, S11-N11-D, S13-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N11-KCoordination of the "Trust" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N11-D, S12-N11-R, S12-N10-K, S12-N12-K, S11-N11-K, S13-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N11-RThe development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the ecological field: to change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N11-D, S12-N11-K, S12-N10-R, S12-N12-R, S11-N11-R, S13-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N12-DDiagnosis of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N12-K, S12-N12-R, S12-N11-D, S12-N13-D, S11-N12-D, S13-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N12-KCoordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N12-D, S12-N12-R, S12-N11-K, S12-N13-K, S11-N12-K, S13-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N12-D, S12-N12-K, S12-N11-R, S12-N13-R, S11-N12-R, S13-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N13-DDiagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N13-K, S12-N13-R, S12-N12-D, S12-N14-D, S11-N13-D, S13-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N13-KCoordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the ecological field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N13-D, S12-N13-R, S12-N12-K, S12-N14-K, S11-N13-K, S13-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N13-RDevelopment of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N13-D, S12-N13-K, S12-N12-R, S12-N14-R, S11-N13-R, S13-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N14-DDiagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N14-K, S12-N14-R, S12-N13-D, S12-N15-D, S11-N14-D, S13-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N14-KCoordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N14-D, S12-N14-R, S12-N13-K, S12-N15-K, S11-N14-K, S13-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N14-RDevelopment of the Standard node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N14-D, S12-N14-K, S12-N13-R, S12-N15-R, S11-N14-R, S13-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N15-DDiagnosis of the "Finance" node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N15-K, S12-N15-R, S12-N14-D, S12-N16-D, S11-N15-D, S13-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the environmental field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N15-D, S12-N15-R, S12-N14-K, S12-N16-K, S11-N15-K, S13-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N15-RDevelopment of the "Finance" node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N15-D, S12-N15-K, S12-N14-R, S12-N16-R, S11-N15-R, S13-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N16-DDiagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N16-K, S12-N16-R, S12-N15-D, S12-N17-D, S11-N16-D, S13-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N16-D, S12-N16-R, S12-N15-K, S12-N17-K, S11-N16-K, S13-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N16-RDevelopment of the Personnel node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N16-D, S12-N16-K, S12-N15-R, S12-N17-R, S11-N16-R, S13-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N17-DDiagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N17-K, S12-N17-R, S12-N16-D, S12-N18-D, S11-N17-D, S13-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N17-KCoordination of the "Technology" node in the contour of the environmental field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N17-D, S12-N17-R, S12-N16-K, S12-N18-K, S11-N17-K, S13-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N17-D, S12-N17-K, S12-N16-R, S12-N18-R, S11-N17-R, S13-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N18-DDiagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the environmental field: to measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N18-K, S12-N18-R, S12-N17-D, S12-N19-D, S11-N18-D, S13-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N18-KCoordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of the environmental field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N18-D, S12-N18-R, S12-N17-K, S12-N19-K, S11-N18-K, S13-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N18-RDevelopment of the “Environment” node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N18-D, S12-N18-K, S12-N17-R, S12-N19-R, S11-N18-R, S13-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S12-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS12-N19-K, S12-N19-R, S12-N18-D, S11-N19-D, S13-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S12-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the environmental field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS12-N19-D, S12-N19-R, S12-N18-K, S11-N19-K, S13-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S12-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS12-N19-D, S12-N19-K, S12-N18-R, S11-N19-R, S13-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

S13 · Security and integrity

Family function: Threats, protection, continuity and control of critical states. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).

CodeFunctionIndicatorsDataFormulaConnectionsValidation criteria
S13-N01-DDiagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N01-K, S13-N01-R, S13-N02-D, S12-N01-D, S01-N01-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N01-KCoordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency indexregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N01-D, S13-N01-R, S13-N02-K, S12-N01-K, S01-N01-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N01-RDevelopment of the subject node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baselineregisters of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profilesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N01-D, S13-N01-K, S13-N02-R, S12-N01-R, S01-N01-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N02-DDiagnostics of the Target node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N02-K, S13-N02-R, S13-N01-D, S13-N03-D, S12-N02-D, S01-N02-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N02-KCoordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence indexstrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N02-D, S13-N02-R, S13-N01-K, S13-N03-K, S12-N02-K, S01-N02-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N02-RDevelopment of the Target node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baselinestrategies; KPI; programs; decision protocolsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N02-D, S13-N02-K, S13-N01-R, S13-N03-R, S12-N02-R, S01-N02-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N03-DDiagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N03-K, S13-N03-R, S13-N02-D, S13-N04-D, S12-N03-D, S01-N03-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N03-KCoordination of the Border node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency indexcontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N03-D, S13-N03-R, S13-N02-K, S13-N04-K, S12-N03-K, S01-N03-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N03-RDevelopment of the Border node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baselinecontour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N03-D, S13-N03-K, S13-N02-R, S13-N04-R, S12-N03-R, S01-N03-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N04-DDiagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N04-K, S13-N04-R, S13-N03-D, S13-N05-D, S12-N04-D, S01-N04-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N04-KCoordination of the Resource node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency indexbalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N04-D, S13-N04-R, S13-N03-K, S13-N05-K, S12-N04-K, S01-N04-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N04-RDevelopment of the Resource node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baselinebalance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacityR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N04-D, S13-N04-K, S13-N03-R, S13-N05-R, S12-N04-R, S01-N04-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N05-DDiagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baselinesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N05-K, S13-N05-R, S13-N04-D, S13-N06-D, S12-N05-D, S01-N05-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N05-KCoordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency indexsensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N05-D, S13-N05-R, S13-N04-K, S13-N06-K, S12-N05-K, S01-N05-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N05-RDevelopment of the Signal node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base linesensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoringR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N05-D, S13-N05-K, S13-N04-R, S13-N06-R, S12-N05-R, S01-N05-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N06-DDiagnosis of the Knowledge node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N06-K, S13-N06-R, S13-N05-D, S13-N07-D, S12-N06-D, S01-N06-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N06-KCoordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency indexResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N06-D, S13-N06-R, S13-N05-K, S13-N07-K, S12-N06-K, S01-N06-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N06-RDevelopment of the Knowledge node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baselineResearch; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archivesR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N06-D, S13-N06-K, S13-N05-R, S13-N07-R, S12-N06-R, S01-N06-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N07-DDiagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baselineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N07-K, S13-N07-R, S13-N06-D, S13-N08-D, S12-N07-D, S01-N07-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N07-KCoordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the protective field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency indexEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N07-D, S13-N07-R, S13-N06-K, S13-N08-K, S12-N07-K, S01-N07-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N07-RDevelopment of the "Solution" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base lineEDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N07-D, S13-N07-K, S13-N06-R, S13-N08-R, S12-N07-R, S01-N07-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N08-DDiagnostics of the Action node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N08-K, S13-N08-R, S13-N07-D, S13-N09-D, S12-N08-D, S01-N08-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N08-KCoordination of the node "Action" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency indexwork plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N08-D, S13-N08-R, S13-N07-K, S13-N09-K, S12-N08-K, S01-N08-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N08-RDevelopment of the Action node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baselinework plans; trackers; production systems; execution actsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N08-D, S13-N08-K, S13-N07-R, S13-N09-R, S12-N08-R, S01-N08-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N09-DDiagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baselineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N09-K, S13-N09-R, S13-N08-D, S13-N10-D, S12-N09-D, S01-N09-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N09-KCoordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency indexuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N09-D, S13-N09-R, S13-N08-K, S13-N10-K, S12-N09-K, S01-N09-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N09-RDevelopment of the feedback node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base lineuser feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurementsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N09-D, S13-N09-K, S13-N08-R, S13-N10-R, S12-N09-R, S01-N09-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N10-DDiagnosis of the Risk node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N10-K, S13-N10-R, S13-N09-D, S13-N11-D, S12-N10-D, S01-N10-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N10-KCoordination of the node "Risk" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency indexrisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N10-D, S13-N10-R, S13-N09-K, S13-N11-K, S12-N10-K, S01-N10-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N10-RDevelopment of the Risk node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baselinerisk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario modelsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N10-D, S13-N10-K, S13-N09-R, S13-N11-R, S12-N10-R, S01-N10-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N11-DDiagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N11-K, S13-N11-R, S13-N10-D, S13-N12-D, S12-N11-D, S01-N11-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N11-KCoordination of the node "Trust" in the contour of the protective field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency indexhistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N11-D, S13-N11-R, S13-N10-K, S13-N12-K, S12-N11-K, S01-N11-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N11-RDevelopment of the "Trust" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baselinehistory of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveysR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N11-D, S13-N11-K, S13-N10-R, S13-N12-R, S12-N11-R, S01-N11-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N12-DDiagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N12-K, S13-N12-R, S13-N11-D, S13-N13-D, S12-N12-D, S01-N12-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N12-KCoordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency indexgraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N12-D, S13-N12-R, S13-N11-K, S13-N13-K, S12-N12-K, S01-N12-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N12-RDevelopment of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baselinegraph links; agreements; consortia; joint projectsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N12-D, S13-N12-K, S13-N11-R, S13-N13-R, S12-N12-R, S01-N12-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N13-DDiagnostics of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N13-K, S13-N13-R, S13-N12-D, S13-N14-D, S12-N13-D, S01-N13-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N13-KCoordination of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency indexGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N13-D, S13-N13-R, S13-N12-K, S13-N14-K, S12-N13-K, S01-N13-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N13-RDevelopment of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base lineGIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N13-D, S13-N13-K, S13-N12-R, S13-N14-R, S12-N13-R, S01-N13-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N14-DDiagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N14-K, S13-N14-R, S13-N13-D, S13-N15-D, S12-N14-D, S01-N14-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N14-KCoordination of the node "Standard" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency indexnormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N14-D, S13-N14-R, S13-N13-K, S13-N15-K, S12-N14-K, S01-N14-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N14-RDevelopment of the Standard node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baselinenormative documents; standards; checklists; audit resultsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N14-D, S13-N14-K, S13-N13-R, S13-N15-R, S12-N14-R, S01-N14-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N15-DDiagnosis of the "Finance" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N15-K, S13-N15-R, S13-N14-D, S13-N16-D, S12-N15-D, S01-N15-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N15-KCoordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency indexaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N15-D, S13-N15-R, S13-N14-K, S13-N16-K, S12-N15-K, S01-N15-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N15-RDevelopment of the "Finance" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baselineaccounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment dataR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N15-D, S13-N15-K, S13-N14-R, S13-N16-R, S12-N15-R, S01-N15-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N16-DDiagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N16-K, S13-N16-R, S13-N15-D, S13-N17-D, S12-N16-D, S01-N16-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N16-KCoordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency indexHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N16-D, S13-N16-R, S13-N15-K, S13-N17-K, S12-N16-K, S01-N16-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N16-RDevelopment of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baselineHRIS; competence registers; training; certificationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N16-D, S13-N16-K, S13-N15-R, S13-N17-R, S12-N16-R, S01-N16-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N17-DDiagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base lineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N17-K, S13-N17-R, S13-N16-D, S13-N18-D, S12-N17-D, S01-N17-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N17-KCoordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the protective field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency indexTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N17-D, S13-N17-R, S13-N16-K, S13-N18-K, S12-N17-K, S01-N17-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N17-RDevelopment of the "Technology" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baselineTRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cardsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N17-D, S13-N17-K, S13-N16-R, S13-N18-R, S12-N17-R, S01-N17-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N18-DDiagnosis of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N18-K, S13-N18-R, S13-N17-D, S13-N19-D, S12-N18-D, S01-N18-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N18-KCoordination of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency indexenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N18-D, S13-N18-R, S13-N17-K, S13-N19-K, S12-N18-K, S01-N18-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N18-RDevelopment of the node "Environment" in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baselineenvironmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observationsR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N18-D, S13-N18-K, S13-N17-R, S13-N19-R, S12-N18-R, S01-N18-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
S13-N19-DDiagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentD = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·TS13-N19-K, S13-N19-R, S13-N18-D, S12-N19-D, S01-N19-DData coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5%
S13-N19-KCoordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the protective field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions.achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency indexKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentK = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·RS13-N19-D, S13-N19-R, S13-N18-K, S12-N19-K, S01-N19-K≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10%
S13-N19-RDevelopment of the node "Result" in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential.result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baselineKPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessmentR = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·VS13-N19-D, S13-N19-K, S13-N18-R, S12-N19-R, S01-N19-Rtarget effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

Methodology of operation of the registry

1. Attachment to object. A set of relevant modules is selected for each project/territory/organization. A module without a designated data owner is considered not to be activated.

2. Base line. The D-modules are calculated first. Their data form the initial state and the list of deviations.

3. Harmonization. K-modules record participants, rights, decisions, resources and conflicts. Without K-validation, the transition to development is considered managerially unprepared.

4. Development. R-modules measure change against the baseline, effect stability, and reproducibility.

5. Verification. Each indicator is assigned a source, owner, update date, calculation method and level of trust. Critical indicators require independent verification.

6. NEUROSVOD. Passport connections form a hypergraph: nodes - modules, edges - dependencies of data, decisions, resources and effects. This allows you to calculate the coherence and detect field breaks.

Other published edition: Union-741 Register_741_Other Organiser741.pptx · Web Text +

13 Family × 19 Node × 3 Status = 741 Module

Master Classifier · passport system · NEUROSVOD Union

Version 1.0 · 25 August 2026

Architecture SOYUZ-741

Strict decomposition of the number 741 into a controlled system of modules

13 families

19 knots

3 Status

Metapoles set the contour: management, meaning, time, resources, data, people, cooperation, sustainability, innovation, production, strategy, ecology, safety.

Single set of system nodes: subject → Objective → Border → resource → Signal → Knowledge → solution → Action → feedback → … → Result.

D - Diagnosis: Measure.

K - Coordination: agree.

R - Development: change and consolidate the effect.

13 × 19 × 3 = 741

Each module has a separate code and passport, but is associated with neighboring states, nodes and families.

Module Passport

Unified format makes the registry comparable and machine-readable

1. Code

2. Function

S05-N06-D

What it measures/coordinates/develops

3. Indicators

4. Data

3–4 Measurable Indicator

sources, owner, refresh rate

5. Formula

6. Contacts

Operating Index D/K/R

Neighbouring States, Nodes and Families

7. Validation

quality threshold and pass criterion

Three states of the field

Common logic of each node life cycle

D · Diagnostics

K · Coordination

R · Development

Task: to establish a baseline and deviations.

Index: D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T

C - completeness of coverage

Q - Quality/Credibility

T — relevance

Objective: To harmonize participants, constraints and resources.

Index: K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R

A - Consistency

L - Connectivity

R - Resource security

The task: to change the state and consolidate the effect.

Index: R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V

G - Increase

S - Sustainability

V - Reproduction

Formulas are project indexes. Their weights and thresholds are calibrated according to the empirical data of a specific application circuit.

S01 · Unity and Management

integrity, subjectivity and consistent management of · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS01-N01-DS01-N01-KS01-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS01-N02-DS01-N02-KS01-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS01-N03-DS01-N03-KS01-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS01-N04-DS01-N04-KS01-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS01-N05-DS01-N05-KS01-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS01-N06-DS01-N06-KS01-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS01-N07-DS01-N07-KS01-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS01-N08-DS01-N08-KS01-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS01-N09-DS01-N09-KS01-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS01-N10-DS01-N10-KS01-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS01-N11-DS01-N11-KS01-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS01-N12-DS01-N12-KS01-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS01-N13-DS01-N13-KS01-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS01-N14-DS01-N14-KS01-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS01-N15-DS01-N15-KS01-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS01-N16-DS01-N16-KS01-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS01-N17-DS01-N17-KS01-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS01-N18-DS01-N18-KS01-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS01-N19-DS01-N19-KS01-N19-REffect / Cost

S02 · Meaning and Values

Targeting, Values, Identity and Public Meaning · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS02-N01-DS02-N01-KS02-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS02-N02-DS02-N02-KS02-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS02-N03-DS02-N03-KS02-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS02-N04-DS02-N04-KS02-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS02-N05-DS02-N05-KS02-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS02-N06-DS02-N06-KS02-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS02-N07-DS02-N07-KS02-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS02-N08-DS02-N08-KS02-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS02-N09-DS02-N09-KS02-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS02-N10-DS02-N10-KS02-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS02-N11-DS02-N11-KS02-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS02-N12-DS02-N12-KS02-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS02-N13-DS02-N13-KS02-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS02-N14-DS02-N14-KS02-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS02-N15-DS02-N15-KS02-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS02-N16-DS02-N16-KS02-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS02-N17-DS02-N17-KS02-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS02-N18-DS02-N18-KS02-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS02-N19-DS02-N19-KS02-N19-REffect / Cost

S03 · Time and Cycles

rhythms, stages, terms, scenarios and cycles of development · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS03-N01-DS03-N01-KS03-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS03-N02-DS03-N02-KS03-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS03-N03-DS03-N03-KS03-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS03-N04-DS03-N04-KS03-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS03-N05-DS03-N05-KS03-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS03-N06-DS03-N06-KS03-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS03-N07-DS03-N07-KS03-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS03-N08-DS03-N08-KS03-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS03-N09-DS03-N09-KS03-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS03-N10-DS03-N10-KS03-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS03-N11-DS03-N11-KS03-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS03-N12-DS03-N12-KS03-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS03-N13-DS03-N13-KS03-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS03-N14-DS03-N14-KS03-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS03-N15-DS03-N15-KS03-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS03-N16-DS03-N16-KS03-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS03-N17-DS03-N17-KS03-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS03-N18-DS03-N18-KS03-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS03-N19-DS03-N19-KS03-N19-REffect / Cost

S04 · Energy and resources

resource provision, energy and material flows · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS04-N01-DS04-N01-KS04-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS04-N02-DS04-N02-KS04-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS04-N03-DS04-N03-KS04-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS04-N04-DS04-N04-KS04-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS04-N05-DS04-N05-KS04-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS04-N06-DS04-N06-KS04-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS04-N07-DS04-N07-KS04-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS04-N08-DS04-N08-KS04-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS04-N09-DS04-N09-KS04-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS04-N10-DS04-N10-KS04-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS04-N11-DS04-N11-KS04-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS04-N12-DS04-N12-KS04-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS04-N13-DS04-N13-KS04-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS04-N14-DS04-N14-KS04-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS04-N15-DS04-N15-KS04-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS04-N16-DS04-N16-KS04-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS04-N17-DS04-N17-KS04-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS04-N18-DS04-N18-KS04-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS04-N19-DS04-N19-KS04-N19-REffect / Cost

S05 · Information and data

data, knowledge, digital footprints and analytics · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS05-N01-DS05-N01-KS05-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS05-N02-DS05-N02-KS05-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS05-N03-DS05-N03-KS05-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS05-N04-DS05-N04-KS05-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS05-N05-DS05-N05-KS05-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS05-N06-DS05-N06-KS05-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS05-N07-DS05-N07-KS05-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS05-N08-DS05-N08-KS05-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS05-N09-DS05-N09-KS05-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS05-N10-DS05-N10-KS05-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS05-N11-DS05-N11-KS05-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS05-N12-DS05-N12-KS05-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS05-N13-DS05-N13-KS05-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS05-N14-DS05-N14-KS05-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS05-N15-DS05-N15-KS05-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS05-N16-DS05-N16-KS05-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS05-N17-DS05-N17-KS05-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS05-N18-DS05-N18-KS05-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS05-N19-DS05-N19-KS05-N19-REffect / Cost

S06 · Man and Consciousness

human potential, competence, perception and training · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS06-N01-DS06-N01-KS06-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS06-N02-DS06-N02-KS06-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS06-N03-DS06-N03-KS06-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS06-N04-DS06-N04-KS06-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS06-N05-DS06-N05-KS06-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS06-N06-DS06-N06-KS06-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS06-N07-DS06-N07-KS06-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS06-N08-DS06-N08-KS06-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS06-N09-DS06-N09-KS06-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS06-N10-DS06-N10-KS06-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS06-N11-DS06-N11-KS06-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS06-N12-DS06-N12-KS06-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS06-N13-DS06-N13-KS06-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS06-N14-DS06-N14-KS06-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS06-N15-DS06-N15-KS06-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS06-N16-DS06-N16-KS06-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS06-N17-DS06-N17-KS06-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS06-N18-DS06-N18-KS06-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS06-N19-DS06-N19-KS06-N19-REffect / Cost

S07 · Cooperation and Networks

Connectivity of subjects, trust, contracts and network interaction · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS07-N01-DS07-N01-KS07-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS07-N02-DS07-N02-KS07-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS07-N03-DS07-N03-KS07-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS07-N04-DS07-N04-KS07-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS07-N05-DS07-N05-KS07-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS07-N06-DS07-N06-KS07-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS07-N07-DS07-N07-KS07-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS07-N08-DS07-N08-KS07-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS07-N09-DS07-N09-KS07-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS07-N10-DS07-N10-KS07-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS07-N11-DS07-N11-KS07-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS07-N12-DS07-N12-KS07-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS07-N13-DS07-N13-KS07-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS07-N14-DS07-N14-KS07-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS07-N15-DS07-N15-KS07-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS07-N16-DS07-N16-KS07-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS07-N17-DS07-N17-KS07-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS07-N18-DS07-N18-KS07-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS07-N19-DS07-N19-KS07-N19-REffect / Cost

S08 · Balance and sustainability

Balance, stability, adaptation and recovery · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS08-N01-DS08-N01-KS08-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS08-N02-DS08-N02-KS08-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS08-N03-DS08-N03-KS08-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS08-N04-DS08-N04-KS08-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS08-N05-DS08-N05-KS08-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS08-N06-DS08-N06-KS08-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS08-N07-DS08-N07-KS08-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS08-N08-DS08-N08-KS08-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS08-N09-DS08-N09-KS08-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS08-N10-DS08-N10-KS08-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS08-N11-DS08-N11-KS08-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS08-N12-DS08-N12-KS08-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS08-N13-DS08-N13-KS08-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS08-N14-DS08-N14-KS08-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS08-N15-DS08-N15-KS08-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS08-N16-DS08-N16-KS08-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS08-N17-DS08-N17-KS08-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS08-N18-DS08-N18-KS08-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS08-N19-DS08-N19-KS08-N19-REffect / Cost

S09 · Evolution and innovation

updating, experiments, R&D and scaling · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS09-N01-DS09-N01-KS09-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS09-N02-DS09-N02-KS09-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS09-N03-DS09-N03-KS09-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS09-N04-DS09-N04-KS09-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS09-N05-DS09-N05-KS09-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS09-N06-DS09-N06-KS09-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS09-N07-DS09-N07-KS09-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS09-N08-DS09-N08-KS09-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS09-N09-DS09-N09-KS09-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS09-N10-DS09-N10-KS09-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS09-N11-DS09-N11-KS09-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS09-N12-DS09-N12-KS09-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS09-N13-DS09-N13-KS09-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS09-N14-DS09-N14-KS09-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS09-N15-DS09-N15-KS09-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS09-N16-DS09-N16-KS09-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS09-N17-DS09-N17-KS09-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS09-N18-DS09-N18-KS09-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS09-N19-DS09-N19-KS09-N19-REffect / Cost

S10 · Creation and production

value creation, production, services and infrastructure execution · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS10-N01-DS10-N01-KS10-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS10-N02-DS10-N02-KS10-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS10-N03-DS10-N03-KS10-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS10-N04-DS10-N04-KS10-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS10-N05-DS10-N05-KS10-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS10-N06-DS10-N06-KS10-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS10-N07-DS10-N07-KS10-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS10-N08-DS10-N08-KS10-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS10-N09-DS10-N09-KS10-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS10-N10-DS10-N10-KS10-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS10-N11-DS10-N11-KS10-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS10-N12-DS10-N12-KS10-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS10-N13-DS10-N13-KS10-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS10-N14-DS10-N14-KS10-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS10-N15-DS10-N15-KS10-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS10-N16-DS10-N16-KS10-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS10-N17-DS10-N17-KS10-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS10-N18-DS10-N18-KS10-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS10-N19-DS10-N19-KS10-N19-REffect / Cost

S11 · Navigation and strategy

priorities, routes, portfolios and strategic choice · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS11-N01-DS11-N01-KS11-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS11-N02-DS11-N02-KS11-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS11-N03-DS11-N03-KS11-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS11-N04-DS11-N04-KS11-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS11-N05-DS11-N05-KS11-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS11-N06-DS11-N06-KS11-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS11-N07-DS11-N07-KS11-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS11-N08-DS11-N08-KS11-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS11-N09-DS11-N09-KS11-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS11-N10-DS11-N10-KS11-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS11-N11-DS11-N11-KS11-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS11-N12-DS11-N12-KS11-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS11-N13-DS11-N13-KS11-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS11-N14-DS11-N14-KS11-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS11-N15-DS11-N15-KS11-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS11-N16-DS11-N16-KS11-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS11-N17-DS11-N17-KS11-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS11-N18-DS11-N18-KS11-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS11-N19-DS11-N19-KS11-N19-REffect / Cost

S12 · Life and Ecology

biocenoses, environment, ecosystem health and natural reproducibility · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS12-N01-DS12-N01-KS12-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS12-N02-DS12-N02-KS12-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS12-N03-DS12-N03-KS12-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS12-N04-DS12-N04-KS12-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS12-N05-DS12-N05-KS12-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS12-N06-DS12-N06-KS12-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS12-N07-DS12-N07-KS12-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS12-N08-DS12-N08-KS12-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS12-N09-DS12-N09-KS12-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS12-N10-DS12-N10-KS12-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS12-N11-DS12-N11-KS12-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS12-N12-DS12-N12-KS12-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS12-N13-DS12-N13-KS12-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS12-N14-DS12-N14-KS12-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS12-N15-DS12-N15-KS12-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS12-N16-DS12-N16-KS12-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS12-N17-DS12-N17-KS12-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS12-N18-DS12-N18-KS12-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS12-N19-DS12-N19-KS12-N19-REffect / Cost

S13 · Security and integrity

Threats, protection, continuity and control of critical states · 57 modules

NodeDKRKey indicator
N01 · SubjectS13-N01-DS13-N01-KS13-N01-RRole / Responsibility
N02 · ObjectiveS13-N02-DS13-N02-KS13-N02-RMeasurability of Purpose
N03 · BorderS13-N03-DS13-N03-KS13-N03-RClarity of the outline
N04 · ResourceS13-N04-DS13-N04-KS13-N04-Rsecurity
N05 · SignalS13-N05-DS13-N05-KS13-N05-RSignal Reliability
N06 · KnowledgeS13-N06-DS13-N06-KS13-N06-RCompleteness of knowledge
N07 · DecisionS13-N07-DS13-N07-KS13-N07-RQuality of solution
N08 · ActionS13-N08-DS13-N08-KS13-N08-Reffectiveness
N09 · FeedbackS13-N09-DS13-N09-KS13-N09-Rcorrection speed
N10 · RiskS13-N10-DS13-N10-KS13-N10-Rresidual risk
N11 · TrustS13-N11-DS13-N11-KS13-N11-RConfidence Index
N12 · CooperationS13-N12-DS13-N12-KS13-N12-Rdensity of connections
N13 · InfrastructureS13-N13-DS13-N13-KS13-N13-Rreliability
N14 · StandardS13-N14-DS13-N14-KS13-N14-RConformity
N15 · FinanceS13-N15-DS13-N15-KS13-N15-RSustainability of Finance
N16 · PersonnelS13-N16-DS13-N16-KS13-N16-RCompetences
N17 · TechnologyS13-N17-DS13-N17-KS13-N17-Ravailability TRL/MRL
N18 · WednesdayS13-N18-DS13-N18-KS13-N18-RQuality of environment
N19 · ResultS13-N19-DS13-N19-KS13-N19-REffect / Cost

Validation criteria

The module is considered working only after passing the control threshold

D · Data control

K · Harmonization control

R · Effect control

• Data coverage ≥ 90%

• relevance in specified SLA

• source traceable

• Re-calculation: rejection ≤ 5%

• ≥ 80% The key stakeholders agreed

• roles and solutions fixed

• Critical conflicts closed

• Resource gap ≤ 10%

• effect confirmed by data

• improvement ≥ 10% or reach the threshold

• Sustainability ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles

• scaling reproducible

NEUROSVOD: Register as a hypergraph

Passport is not a card in the archive, but an active node of the network of dependencies

S05-N06-D

Knowledge · Diagnosis

Neighborhood Node

Related Family

Data

Effect

Procedure for implementation

From the classifier to the working control circuit

01 · Outline Selection

02 · Activation D

03 · Passing K

territory / project / organization

Data sources and baseline

owners, roles, decisions, resources

04 · Run R

05 · Hypergraph

06 · Scaling

change of state and effect control

automatic analysis of connectivity and breaks

Replication of confirmed modules

741

Result

SOYUZ-741 turns Field Theory into a verifiable system of description, management and development

Modular Passports

the Field Families

Mandatory Passport Fields

Next Level: Digital Registry + graph links + API NEUROSVOD + Linking to real data and indicator owners.

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

Symbolic System and Languages

Source Status: Primary Document

Material about a common language of symbols, classification and semantic connections within the system.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/simvolicheskaya-sistema-i-yazyki

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA · ECO-PPA · SPECZASHCHITA · ARCHIVE OF HERITAGE

Concept author: Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov

29 August 2026 · Status: project for expert approbation

02 / MANAGEMENT SOLUTION

Launch 90-day pilot — do not announce a new universal language

The goal of the pilot is to prove that a single semantic chain can connect a person, document, sign, rule, and data without losing context.

Decision
Approve the limited approbation: 60 basic concepts, Russian and English languages, three application scenarios, six external contours of conformity and independent testing of understanding.

ParameterProposed framework
ProductFederal Symbolic-Semantic System: Concept ID → definitions → terms → symbols → rules → proofs
Not the productNot a secret code, not a replacement for national languages, not a single set of icons and not an automatic arbiter of truth.
CompatibilityBIS/CPMI, FSB, IMF, ISO, FATF, World Bank; W3C, Unicode and IETF as a technical basis.
Day result 90Prototype registers, three end-to-end cases, test report and GO / GO solution WITH CONDITIONS / STOP.
The criterion of successNot advertising "uniqueness", but a measurable reduction in interpretation errors with full traceability of meaning.

Positioning
Not to replace international standards, but to link them to superstructure verifiable meta-language with cultural adaptation, machine validation and right of appeal.

03 / DEFINITIONS

Object, concept, sign, symbol and code are not the same thing

Object/event. fragment of reality or subject matter about which the statement is made

A unit of knowledge that captures essential features and relationships in a given area

A sign. carrier, which in the context represents something else for interpretation

A sign whose function may be based on a rule, convention, habit, or partial motivation; the school of definition is always specified

Term. verbal designation of the concept in a specific language, industry and editorial

Code. agreed conformity and rules for the formation or transformation of signs

Language. Iconic inventory, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, community of use, and history of change

Context. scope, purpose, audience, time, jurisdiction, and situation limiting permissible interpretation

Key difference
The stable identifier, the content of the concept and the human readable name are three different fields. The name may change; the identifier is not re-used.

Base: Pierce; tradition "Course" Saussure; Morris; ISO 704:2022; ISO 1087:2019.

04 / THEORETICAL FUNDAMENT

Meaning arises in relation, system of differences and context

SchoolWorking thesisA consequence for architecture
Ch. C. PierceA sign is a triad: a sign, object, interpreter; an icon, index, and symbol describe different bases of connection.Keep the object, the function of the sign, the context, and the interpretive hypothesis separately.
F. de SaussureIn the Kursa tradition, the sign connects the signifier and the signifier; significance is given by differences within the system.You cannot publish a sign without a namespace, oppositions, and a system of terms.
Ch. MorrisSyntactics, semantics, and pragmatics are interrelated perspectives of semiosis.Formal correctness does not guarantee correct referent and proper use.
J. LotmanThe semiosphere is heterogeneous; borders work as translational mechanisms.We need a federation of local languages and explicit translation gateways.
Uh. CassirerLanguage, myth, art, and science are different symbolic forms of experience organization.Do not mix cultural, artistic, scientific and legal modes of evidence.
Uh-huh. EcoMeaning acts as a network of cultural knowledge, and interpretation is limited by text and context.Verify the "encyclopedia" of links; keep confidence, grounds, and review.

Source study clause
The Course of General Linguistics was published after Saussure's death in student notes. Therefore, a strict attribution in the document is “in the tradition of the “Course” of Saussure.”

05 / PROJECT SUBJECT

Verifiable meta-language bridge, not universal alphabet

The system createsThe system does not promise
stable ID of concepts and versionsOne symbol with the same meaning in all cultures
the Multilingual ThermbaseAutomatically accurate translation without expert
Register of graphic and other expressionsreplacing text with pictograms
Formal relationships and limitationsCompleteness of the world in one closed ontology
Obvious types of compliance with external standardsRight to rewrite BIS, FSB, IMF, ISO, FATF the World Bank
origin, versions, decisions and appealsUndeniable Conclusion AI
Federal possession of primary knowledgecentralized withdrawal of local knowledge

Strong formula
Many languages — one manageable semantic core — no silent substitution of meaning.

06 / ARCHITECTURE

Six Layers Link Reality and Proof

№LayerWhat is fixed
1Realityobject, event, observation, territory, time, participants
2Conceptdefinition, features, relationships, scope, examples and counterexamples
3Human languagesterms, synonyms, simple explanation, language, writing, industry
4Expressionsgraphic symbol, diagram, formula, map, gesture, sound; function and application profile
5Machine semanticsRDF/JSON-LD, SKOS/OWL, SHACL, requests, API and controlled schemes
6Management and proofowner, version, source, solution, test, access, appeal and archive

Invariant
Any public or machine output should allow you to go backwards: expression → concept → original object → Source → rule → solution → Version.

  • A semantic chain is considered incomplete if any transition is based only on the assumption of AI.
  • Different symbolic forms may refer to a single concept, but retain their own context and mode of evidence.

07 / UNIT SYSTEM

Passport of symbolic-semantic unit

BlockRequired fields
Identityconcept_id, type, namespace, status, owner
Contentsdefinition, area, necessary features, examples, counterexamples
Languagespreferred / accepted / deprecated labels, BCP 47, writing, industry
Expressionssymbol_id, file/notation, function, size, color profile, available name
Connectionsbroader, narrower, related, part-of, causes, measures, exact/close mapping
Formalizationaxioms, limits, units, cardinality, permissible values
Contextaudience, jurisdiction, purpose, channel, life cycle, prohibitions
Originsource, author, license, issued, modified, evidence
Version and solutionversion IRI, supersedes, review, approver, confidence, appeal

Prohibition
Normative symbol, its explanation and decorative illustration are different types of objects and cannot replace each other.

08 / REGISTERS

Eight interrelated registers instead of one dictionary

R1 Concepts - ID, definition, scope, relationships, examples, and counterexamples.

R2 Terms - language, writing, industry, preferred and prohibited options.

R3 Expressions - pictograms, formulas, schemes, sounds, gestures, text equivalents.

R4 Contexts — audience, purpose, jurisdiction, channel, cultural constraints.

R5 Rules - axioms, SHACL restrictions, controlled circuits and test tests.

R6 Conformities - external system, version, communication type, confidence and validator.

R7 Evidence - source, origin, license, review, test results.

R8 Solutions and Versions - Owner, Status, Date, Supersedes, Change Log and Appeal.

End-to-end key
The concept is the center of connection. A word, a symbol, a formula, and a machine record do not duplicate a concept, but refer to it through an explicit type of relation.

09 / LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE

Each language solves its own problem - no one is declared the main

Language / ModeStrength SideLimitation
Naturalwealth, dialogue, cultural accuracypolysemy and context dependence
SimpleUnderstanding of a wide audienceSimplification should not distort the rule
Controlledunambiguous instructions and verificationlimited vocabulary and expressiveness
Visualfast recognition and reviewcultural ambiguity; a test is needed
Mathcompactness and outputPreparation and predefined assumptions
Formal-logicalaxioms, limitations, consistencyIt does not exhaust social meaning.
Machineexchange, validation, requests, automationSchema without semantics creates false compatibility
Art / Ritualmemory, identity, ambiguityother mode of evidence; cannot be normalized as an instruction

Landmarks: ISO 24495-1; ASD-STE100; Unicode/CLDR; W3C; Pierce, Morris, Lotman, Cassirer, Eco.

10 / TRANSLATION

Translation is a typed match, not a line replacement

Type of communicationMeaningPermitted Use
exactThe meaning of the terms coincides in the stated contextAutomatic exchange after validation
closeIt’s close, but there’s still a big difference.show a reservation; do not consider the identity
broad / narrowOne concept is wider or already anotherobvious conversion with possible loss
contextualThe match is valid only in the area, jurisdiction or phaseRequired Context Profile
proposedconformity proposed by man or AIonly draft; requires review
conflictedThere are competing interpretations.prohibition of automatic decision; appeal
none / unknownEquivalent is missing or not installedPreserve Original and Uncertainty

Safety Rule
No system should silently raise close, contextual, or suggested to explicit. Automatic translation saves the original, model version, confidence and grounds.

11 / IDENTIFICATIONS AND VERSIONS

Stable identity — changeable content — unchangeable history

ObjectExample of patternRule
Concepthttps://id.example.org/concept/{opaque-id}ID does not contain a variable name and is not re-used
Dictionary-serieshttps://vocab.example.org/biosphereindicates the current published edition
Version of dictionary.../biosphere/2026-08-29Unchangeable image available after replacement
Term.../biosphere#Biocenosissaved when specified; deprecated when outputted
Data Sethttps://data.example.org/dataset/water-qualityseries separately from the data snapshot
  • Canonization of URI is performed by a single service; visually similar Cyrillic and Latin characters are not considered equal.
  • An incompatible change of meaning receives a new ID and a clear connection to the replaced concept.
  • The version contains a predecessor, a description of the changes, the date, the author and the evaluation of backward compatibility.

Foundation: RFC 3986, RFC 3987, RFC 8820; OWL 2; DCAT 3; Data on the Web Best Practices.

12 / TECHNICAL GLASS

Open standards allocate roles between presentation, meaning and verification

LevelStandardRole
Symbols and LocalesUnicode, CLDR, BCP 47characters, scripts, language tags, local formats
IdentityURI / IRIglobally distinguishable persistent links
Exchange of CountsRDF, JSON-LDmachine representation of statements and context
DictionariesSKOSconcepts, hierarchies and types of conformity
OntologyOWL 2classes, properties, axioms and output
ValidationSHACLVerifiable forms and limitations of data
QueriesSPARQLsearch for links and explainable ways
OriginPROV-OWho, when, and on what basis did he make the claim?
CataloguesDCAT 3publishing sets, versions, services and access policies

Principle
The stack is chosen not because it is a standard, but because each role has an open format, an automatic test, and a migration path.

13 / VISUAL LANGUAGE

Understanding and accessibility are measured, not assumed

MonitoringProject requirement
UnderstandingISO 9186- a similar test for each target cultural and linguistic group; the target threshold ≥85% for the usual symbol.
DistinctionElements are recognized at minimum working size; target threshold ≥95%; Confusion of nearby symbols <5%.
AvailabilityThe textual equivalent of 100% significant images; meaning is never conveyed by color, form, or position alone.
ContrastTarget WCAG 2.2 AA: 4,5:1 for plain text; 3:1 for large text and meaningful graphics.
LocalizationBCP 47, CLDR, RTL/LTR, fonts and grapheme clusters; flag not used as language designation.
SecurityISO 7010/3864 is a separate protected namespace; the characters are not repainted or redefined.

Cultural protection
Sacred, ethnic and historical symbols are published with a description of the community, the origin, limitations of application and the right of the community to challenge the interpretation.

14 / INTERNATIONAL BENCHMARK

What they give BIS, FSB, IMF, ISO, FATF and the World Bank - and what layer remains to be connected

ContourStrength SideAdd-on Task
BIS / CPMIISO 20022, harmonized requirements, glossaries and structured messages.Linking a financial message to concepts, visual explanations, context, and origin.
FSBLEI, UTI, UPI and global identifier management; updated lexicons.Add single passport concepts and typed connections entity ↔ product ↔ event ↔ solution.
IMFSDMX, distribution standards, metadata and DQAF data quality.Link the indicator to the formula, semantics, version, interpretation and applied action.
ISOcross-industry principles of terminology, metadata, codes, and symbol testing.Collect disparate standards into an operating profile with open machine-readable conformances.
FATFRecommendations, glossary, risk-based approach; differentiation of conformity and effectiveness.Formalize a controlled dictionary, the context of the norm, the proof and prohibition of automatic legal inference.
World Bankcodes and metadata of indicators, methodologies, catalogs and open publication of data.Combine the indicator with the local concept, solution, cultural presentation and version of the classification.

Correct claim
The proposed system is designed more broadly along the cross-layer connectivity. It is considered "better" only where the pilot will show a lower error of interpretation and faster tracing - while maintaining compatibility with the source.

15 / CHECK BENEFITS

Ten criteria instead of the declaration "better world institutions"

CriterionBasic conditionPurpose of the pilot
Meaningful IDCodes and terms are separate.100% concepts have a stable ID
Traceabilitysource is searched manually≤5 minutes: sign → Definition → Source → solution
Multilingualismtranslation tableconnection type, context and version for 100% matches
Machine CheckValid only format≥95% Critically SHACL-checks pass
Cultural understandingDesigned by≥85% for each test group
Availabilityadded after design0 critical violations; 100% text equivalents
OriginLink without chain of solutions100% records: source, owner, version, status
FederationCentral copylocal owner and reversible displays
AIbelievable answer0 silent exact; all suggestions have confidence
Appealmanual correspondence100% Controversial Links Have Log and Solution Route

Total KPI
Reduction of interpretation defects by at least 30% against the original process in two of the three pilot scenarios.

16 / FEDERAL MODEL

Common Core of Rules: Local Knowledge

ContourPossessedPublish to a common core
Subject areadefinitions, data, experts, restrictionsID, approved terms, relationships, versions
Language / Culturelocal names, symbols, sensitivityproven expressions, contexts, prohibitions
OrganizationOperating rules and evidenceApplication profiles, statuses and origin
International sourceown standard and classifieronly link, version and type of compliance
Semantic Councilnot the content of the areas, but the rules of pairingID Policy, Versions, Quality and Appeals
  • The shared kernel does not copy or assign an external standard: it stores the link, version, license, and display.
  • The local outline may reject the proposed conformity by providing a rationale and alternative.
  • Changing the external source triggers the impact assessment; critical entry is updated in the project time frame ≤30 days.

Sovereignty
Federation means compatibility without loss of authorship, jurisdiction and the right of the community to describe its own values.

17 / ECOSYSTEM

Roles are divided - the person remains the subject of the decision

ComponentRole in the Symbolic SystemDoesn't
EQUILIBRIUMobservation, analytics, scripts, KPI, consistency checkDoes not make a political or personal decision
SFERAmultilingual explanation, participation, competence and feedbackDoes not replace project management
ECO-PPAbinds contract terms, resources, obligations, KPI and evidencedoes not perform work
SPECZASHCHITAControlled operational language for tasks, states, and incidentsNot the only validator.
Heritage archiveoriginals, versions, origins, registers, solutions and cultural variantsdoes not rewrite the previous editions
Human / OrganApproves controversial meaning, limitation and action; considers appealdoes not delegate the responsibility of the model AI

AI-assistant
AI can extract candidate concepts, offer translations, and identify conflicts. Publication of regulatory compliance requires an authorized human decision.

18 / LIFE CYCLE AND ARCHIVE

No word of meaning disappears without a trace.

StatusActionWithdrawal
S0 Candidateextract from source or participant's proposaloriginal, author, date, rights
S1 Breedingobject, concept, term and expression are separatedCards and Communications
S2 Formalizationrelationships, constraints and units are specifiedSKOS/OWL/SHACL-profile
S3 ConformitiesComparison of languages and external contoursexact/close/broad/narrow/contextual
S4 Verificationexpert, machine, cultural and affordableProtocols and defects
S5 Publicationversion approval and scopeInvariable Image
S6 Operationobservation of actual understanding and errorsmetrics and incidents
S7 Replacement / Archivenew version, deprecated, superiors, migrationhistory and feedback

Appeal
The disputed interpretation preserves the parties, the evidence, the temporary rule, the decision and the possibility of reconsideration. The original has not changed.

19 / KRISTALL741 AND CATALOGUE 260

Module addressing is not sacral code and not proof of truth

Address Formula
19 Systems × 13 Phases × 3 Scale = 741 module. Each module is assigned a space of concepts, rules and evidence 260 serves as a managed set of basic concepts and indicators.

ElementWorking functionLimitation
19 SystemsSubject contours of observation and balancethe list is subject to verification and version
13 PhasesLife cycle from design to archivingDoes not replace the industry process
3 scalespopulation, state/society, planet/biosphereLinks between scales require explicit rules
741 moduleaddress for requirements, data, terms and checksNot a rating and not a standard in itself
Catalog 260The first managed dictionary of general concepts/indicatorspilot starts with 60 priority units
SUR-810neighboring trace and completeness contour, if confirmed by the methodnot mixed with passport concepts without defining the role

In the pilot, the practical utility of addressing is checked, and not the universality of the numerical design.

20 / PILOT SCENARIES

Three cases test the natural, financial and operational meaning

ScenarioEnd-to-end chainVerification
Biocenosis and water qualityobservation → term → map/symbol → unit of measurement → ontology → solutionDoes it make sense to the ecologist, resident, operator and model?
ECO-PPA: Commitment and KPIItem of document → concept_id → formula → SHACL → Proof → calculationIs it possible to exclude different interpretations of the result and double counting?
International Finance / ComplianceBIS/FSB/IMF/ISO/FATF/WB → display → Local term → EventWhether the source version, type of compliance and legal reservation are retained

Minimum volume
60 Concepts × 2 Language × minimum 3 presentation; six outer contours; not less 50 participants in each cultural and linguistic group for the symbol test.

  • The original process is fixed before implementation so that the comparison of errors and time is honest.
  • All critical conclusions are independently reviewed; a sample of tests is specified by a statistical calculation.

21 / PLAN 90 DAYS

The five stages end with verifiable artifacts

TimeframeWorkControl output
Days 1–15Charter, areas, roles, initial errors, analysis of six external contoursapproved frame and baseline
Days 16–30concept model, ID/version policy, dictionary of connection types, managementsheet 1.0 and GO-1
Days 31–55eight registers, 60 concepts, RU/EN, formal forms and APIthe Demo Registry
Days 56–75Three scenarios, AI-assisted mapping, visual and accessibility testsDefects and Adjustments
Days 76–90independent verification, retest, assessment KPI, migration planSolution GO / GO WITH CONDITIONS / STOP

Stop-condition
If the project cannot show the origin of the critical value, the right of appeal or reversible compliance with an external source, the publication of this outline is blocked.

22 / KPI AND SOLUTION

Success - Proven Compatibility Without Losing Meaning

KPI days 90Goal
Basic concepts≥60; 100% have ID, definition, owner, source, version and status
External correspondencesBIS, FSB, IMF, ISO, FATF, World Bank; 100% with type of communication and version
Complete required fields≥98%; Active Duplicate ID — 0
Machine validation≥95% critical forms pass; each defect is classified
Understanding the symbols≥85% in each group; opposite dangerous error ≤1%
Availability100% text equivalents; 0 critical defects WCAG 2.2 AA
Tracingmedian ≤5 minutes from expression to source and solution
Errors of interpretationDecline ≥30% the Baseline 2 from 3 Scenario
Dispute management100% contested mappings have owner, log and appeal route

GO Solution
Mandatory thresholds of traceability, origin, safety and appeal are reached; the economic effect is confirmed in at least two scenarios.

23 / RISKS AND PROTECTION

The main danger is not a technical error, but an imperceptible substitution of meaning

RiskProtective rule
False Universalityfederation, context and local community right to their own description
Automatic Equivalencetypes of mapping, confidence, human assertion, prohibition of silent exposure
Mixing the modes of truthseparate profiles: scientific, legal, artistic, sacred, operational
A culturally dangerous symbolprescreening, local testing, text equivalent and recall
Reusing IDimmutable identity, deprecated, supersedes and page-monument
Dependence on the platformopen formats, portable schematics, uploading and recovery test
Licenses Standardsstore only permitted data, links, versions and own displays
AI-hallucinationoriginal, provenance, model version, basis, reviewer and appeal
Supercentralizationlocal ownership of primary data and the minimum required overall layer

Man is a Subject
No recommendation of the model turns into a normative meaning, right, prohibition or sanction without an authorized human decision and an accessible challenge mechanism.

24 / RESULTS

The system is stronger not by the scale of the application, but by the quality of the monitored communication

Concept in one line
Concept ID → Definition → Communications → Terms of different languages → Symbols and Formulas → Machine rules → Application → Proof → Version → Appeal.

  • Use BIS, FSB, IMF, ISO, FATF and World Bank as compatible industry sources, not as competitors.
  • Measure the advantage of trace time, number of interpretation defects, completeness of origin, and quality of understanding.
  • Start with 60 concepts and three scenarios; expand catalog 260 and address 741 only after independent GO.
  • Secure federal ownership, immutable versions, accessibility, cultural verification, and right of appeal.
  • To leave a person with authority and responsibility; AI is the role of a probabilistic assistant.

Proposed next step
30-minute installation session: 10 minutes - area and boundaries; 10 minutes - six outer contours; 10 minutes - approval of three cases and the composition of the expert group.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · 29 August 2026

25 / SOURCES I

Theory, terminology, visual symbols and accessibility

[1] Peirce — What Is a Sign?

[2] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Peirce’s Theory of Signs

[3] Saussure — Cours de linguistique générale, full text

[4] Morris — Foundations of the Theory of Signs, MPI publication

[5] Lotman — On the semiosphere, University of Tartu

[6] Eco — A Theory of Semiotics, Indiana University Press

[7] ISO 704:2022 — Terminology work

[8] ISO 1087:2019 — Terminology work and terminology science

[9] ISO/IEC 11179-3:2023 — Metadata registries

[10] ISO 7000:2019 — Graphical symbols

[11] ISO 7010:2019 — Safety signs

[12] ISO 9186-1 — Comprehensibility testing

[13] ISO 24495-1:2023 — Plain language

[14] W3C — WCAG 2.2

[15] Unicode CLDR

[16] Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm

Note
The full texts of part of the standards ISO are distributed under license. The project uses official cards, scope and allowed links; the application of the requirements requires licensed access to the desired edition.

26 / SOURCES II

Machine semantics and international financial benchmark

[17] W3C — SKOS Reference

[18] W3C — OWL 2 Overview

[19] W3C — SHACL

[20] W3C — JSON-LD 1.1

[21] W3C — PROV-O

[22] W3C — DCAT 3

[23] IETF — RFC 3986 URI Generic Syntax

[24] BIS/CPMI — Harmonised ISO 20022 data requirements, 2026 update

[25] FSB — Governance of LEI, UPI, UTI and CDE

[26] IMF — Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board / SDMX

[27] IMF — Data Quality Assessment Framework

[28] FATF — The FATF Recommendations

[29] FATF — Guidance on Digital Identity

[30] World Bank — Open Data

[31] World Bank — Open Data Toolkit: metadata and DCAT

[32] World Bank — WDI Metadata Glossary

Date of inspection
The references and relevance of the key official pages are verified by 29 August 2026 The concept is not a standard, legal opinion or approval of these organizations.

Other published edition: Symbolic system and languages Simvolicheskaya_sistema_i_yazyki.pptx · web text +

Verifiable meta-language-bridge for concepts, words, images, data and actions

Compatible with BIS · FSB · IMF · ISO · FATF · World Bank

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The solution now is a limited 90-day pilot

REQUEST FOR SOLUTION

basic concepts

Language: RU / EN

DAYS

end-to-end scenarios

External Circuits

Do not declare a new

Universal language

Related Registers

Independent GO / STOP

= success less error meaning + full trace

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

"RISK"

THE PROBLEM

The same line does not mean the same thing.

FINANCE

No passport concept

Probability and damage

The object and the term are confused

FATF

risk-based obligation

word without area, version

and Evidence Regime

the word match is issued as exact

BIOSPHERE

format passes - meaning diverges

The threat of sustainability

AI hides the uncertainty

PROJECT

Event and Owner

Unable to prove source

INTERFACE

color / icon / status

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Object, concept, sign, term, and code are different entities

BORDER OF CONCEPTS

OBJECT

CONCEPT

SIGN

TERMIN

RCD

What is being considered

unit of knowledge

What represents

word in language

Conformity rules

SYNTACTICS

SEMANTICS

PRAGMATIC

sign ↔ sign

sign ↔ object

sign ↔ use

Form and rules of combination

referent, concept and relationship

audience, purpose and context

Formally correct record may have incorrect referent and incorrect use

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

One semantic core - many languages and expressions

TARGET MODEL

OBJECT

CONCEPT

TERMS

EXPRESSIONS

RULES

PROOF

Event

concept_id

RU · EN · …

Symbol · Formula

OWL · SHACL

PROV · Version

Tracing Invariant

expression → concept → source → rule → solution → version

No transition on assumption AI alone

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Six Layers Link Reality and Proof

ARCHITECTURE

6 · GOVERNANCE

owner · version · decision · appeal · Archive

5 · MACHINE SEMANTICS

RDF · JSON-LD · SKOS · OWL · SHACL · SPARQL

4 · EXPRESSIONS

icon · formula · map · Scheme · sound

3 · HUMAN LANGUAGES

term · simple explanation · BCP 47 · CLDR

2 · CONCEPT

Definition · Relationships · Region · Examples

1 · REALITY

object · event · time · territory · participant

Original and origin pass through all layers

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Passport Concept Makes Sense of a Managed Unit

UNIT CARD

TERMS

LINKS

concept_id

labels · language · industry

broader · part-of · causes

https://id.example.org/

concept/8f2…

EXPRESSIONS

FORMALIZATION

symbol_id · alt · profile

axioms · SHACL · Units

Definition

Region · status

Owner · version

CONTACTS

ORIGIN

audience · target · ban

source · license · review

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Eight registers are stronger than one dictionary

OPERATIONAL MODEL

CONCEPT

TERMS

EXPRESSIONS

CONTEXTS

ID · Definition ·

Language · synonym · prohibition

symbol · formula · alt

audience · target · right

RULES

CONFORMITY

PROOF

DECISIONS

axioms · shapes · tests

source · version · type

provenance · review · license

status · supersedes · appeal

The end-to-end key is a concept; all transitions are typed and versioned

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Translation is a typed match, not a line replacement

INTER-Language Gateway

EXACT

CLOSE

BROAD / NARROW

CONTEXTUAL

PROPOSED

CONFLICTED

matches

Close

wider / already

Only in profile

Requires review

Appeal

Publication Policy

close and contextual never rise to act silently

original, source version and confidence remain

AI creates a proposal; authorized expert approves

conflicted blocks automatic action

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Six institutions give strong contours - the superstructure connects them

INTERNATIONAL Benchmark

BIS / CPMI

FSB

IMF

ISO 20022 · DSD · glossary

LEI · UTI · UPI · lifecycle

SDMX · standards · DQAF

Message ↔ concept ↔ provenance

Who is ↔ product ↔ event

index ↔ formula ↔ action

ISO

FATF

WORLD BANK

terminology · MDR · codes

glossary · notes · risk-based

indicator metadata · catalog · API

Single operating profile

norm ↔ context ↔ proof

source ↔ local value ↔ version

Do not replace sources - link them in one evidence chain

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

"Better" means to pass ten measurable criteria

CHECK ADVANTAGE

100%

100%

Concepts with Sustainable ID

Origin and Versions

≤5 min

sign → source → solution

Meaning only through color.

100%

critical SHACL-checks

Controversial Relationships with Appeal

≤30 dn.

Understanding Symbols in a Group

Update Critical Record

Locally

silent act mappings

possession of primary knowledge

Result: −30% Defects in interpretation 2 from 3 Cases against Baseline

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Ecosystem shares analysis, participation, execution and memory

ROLES AND ADDRESSATION

EQUILIBRIUM

ECO-PPA

observation · scenarios · KPI

contract · resource · indicator

SENSE

NUCLEAR

concept_id · mappings

version · provenance · appeal

SFERA

SPECZASHCHITA

people · dialogue · competences

operations · status · incidents

19 Systems × 13 Phases × 3 Scale = 741 Module

KRISTALL741

Catalog 260: pilot starts with 60

Module addressing is not sacral code and not proof of truth

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Three scenarios go through five stages in 90 days

PILOT PLAN

BIOCENOSIS AND WATER

ECO-PPA AND KPI

FINANCE / COMPLAENCE

surveillance → map → ontology

Document → Formula → Proof

6 Sources → mapping → Event

1–15

16–30

31–55

56–75

76–90

Charter

and baseline

Model

and governance

Registers

and 60

Cases

and tests

Audit

GO / STOP

Minimum: 60 Concepts · RU/EN · 3 submissions · 6 External Circuits · ≥50 participants per group

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

GO requires accuracy, understanding, origin and appeal

CRITERIA OF NOTES

100%

ID + source + version

Complete required fields

Machine Validation

≤5 min

Understanding of symbols

Full trace

Defects in 2/3 cases

No origin of critical importance

no reversible mapping to source

STOP

No route of appeal

AI automatically creates a norm or sanction

Thresholds - pilot design criteria, not norms ISO

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The next step is to approve the pilot area in 15 days

DECISION

Not a new universal alphabet,

A testable meta-language bridge

Appoint an owner and semantic advice

Approve 60 concepts and three scenarios

Identify an independent validator and test group

Fix baseline, KPI and STOP-conditions

Action to be taken: allow 90-day expert testing

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Sources cited in presentation 24

  • https://www.iso.org/standard/79077.html
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
  • https://www.bis.org/cpmi/publ/d230.htm
  • https://www.fsb.org/2020/09/lei-roc-to-become-governance-body-for-otc-derivatives-identifiers/
  • https://dsbb.imf.org/
  • https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Fatf-recommendations.html
  • https://www.worldbank.org/en/data/opendatatoolkit/supply
  • https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/
  • https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Cours_de_linguistique_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9rale/Texte_entier
  • https://www.mpi.nl/publications/item2364493/foundations-theory-signs
  • https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986/
  • https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode17.0.0/
  • https://cldr.unicode.org/
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/78915.html
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/
  • https://dsbb.imf.org/dqrs/DQAF
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/59226.html
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/
  • https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2005.33.1.09

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

Ledger: Archetypes and Cycles

Source Status: Primary Document

Model of recording and interpreting recurring cycles, roles and system states.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/schetnaya-kniga-arkhetipy-i-tsikly

Open on the site

20 Archetypes × 13 Tone = 260 Unique coordinates of meaning and time

Concept: Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov

Edition · 1.0 2026

1. Purpose of the Ledger

MAIN DEFINITION
A ledger is a register of the movement of time, meanings, decisions, resources, actions, and proven results.

The unit of account is kin, a unique coordinate that arises from a combination of one archetype and one tone of the cycle. The archetype answers the question “what function is manifested?”, the tone is “how and at what stage is it manifested?”.

The purpose of the book is to transform the symbolic matrix 13×20 in a testable language of observation, design, execution and feedback for Man, community, nature, organization and state.

Status of the method. The terms 20 solar seals and 13 galactic tones are borrowed from the Dreamspell/13:20 system. Their integration with EQUILIBRIUM, SUR‑810, KRISTALL741 and ESG‑IR 1.0 is the author’s applied model. This document does not replace the scholarly history of Maya calendars and does not, in itself, claim causal physical effects.

2. Basic architecture 13×20

FORMULA
KIN = ARCHETIP × TON CYCLA; 20 × 13 = 260.

LevelSizeFunction
Archetype20Quality function: what is manifested.
Tone13Rhythm and stage: how it manifests itself.
Keen260Unique pair of "archetype + ton".
Wave13 kinFull cycle from target to presence.
Castle52 chinaFour waves; an enlarged cycle.
Turnover260 kinFive locks; complete passage of the matrix.

The kin number specifies two cyclic coordinates: the archetype index = ((K−1) mod 20)+1; tone index = ((K−1) mod 13)+1. Since the numbers 13 and 20 mutually simple, full turn from 260 steps covers all possible combinations without repeating the pair.

3. Twenty Archetypes

Archetypes form a vocabulary of qualitative functions. In the Ledger, each image is given not only a symbolic meaning but also an operational question that allows the image to be translated into an observable decision.

№ArchetypeThe Core of MeaningThe accounting question
1Red DragonBirth, Being, CareWhat should be born and get a life basis?
2White WindSpirit, Breath, CommunicationWhat message should be sent and heard?
3Blue NightInner depth, intuition, abundanceWhat hidden resource should be recognized?
4Yellow SeedDesign, purpose, and potentialWhat potential should grow into a measurable result?
5Red SerpentVital force, instinct, preservationWhat energy supports the stability of the system?
6White Connector of WorldsTransition, Equality, LiberationWhat should be completed to connect the separated contours?
7The Blue HandKnowledge, healing, completionWhat action turns knowledge into recovery?
8The Yellow StarBeauty, art, harmonyHow do we reconcile the quality, form and culture of the result?
9Red MoonPurification, water, currentHow to clean the stream and restore its natural movement?
10White DogHeart, love, loyaltyWhat keeps trust and human connection alive?

Archetypes 11–20

№ArchetypeThe Core of MeaningThe accounting question
11Blue MonkeyPlay, creativity, overcoming illusionsWhat is the new opportunity through creativity?
12Yellow ManFree will, wisdom, influenceWhat responsible decision does a person make?
13Red Sky WandererSpace, exploration, awakeningWhat boundaries need to be explored or expanded?
14The White WizardTimelessness, receptivityWhat is possible with full presence?
15Blue EagleVision, Mind, Image of the FutureWhat does a complete picture of the future look like?
16The Yellow WarriorReasonableness, Fearlessness, QuestionWhat exact question removes uncertainty?
17Red EarthNavigation, synchronicity, evolutionHow do you reconcile the action with the real rhythm of the environment?
18White MirrorOrder, reflection, infinityWhat does objective feedback show?
19Blue StormTransformation, energy, self-renewalWhat impulse triggers the system update?
20Yellow SunLife, clarity, universal fireHow does the result serve the whole and enhance life?

4. Thirteen tone cycle

The tones set the sequence of the unfolding process: from the goal and the challenge - through the form, the setting and the manifestation - to liberation, cooperation and the completed presence.

№ToneEntityActionThe accounting question
1MagneticGoalMerge / AttractWhat is the center of gravity of the cycle?
2LunarChallengePolarize / StabilizeWhat contradiction requires balance?
3ElectricMinistryActivate / BindWho and what should be included in the action?
4Self-SubsistingFormDefine/MeasureWhat is the exact form and measure of the result?
5OverturningPowerEmpower / ManageWhat ability does the manifestation provide?
6RhythmicEqualityOrganize / BalanceHow to allocate roles, time and resources?
7ResonanceConfigureConducting / InspiringWhat frequency and source should I focus on?

Tones 8–13

№ToneEntityActionThe accounting question
8GalacticaIntegrityHarmonizing / ModelingDoes the action conform to the accepted principle?
9SolarIntentionPulsate / realizeWhat intention directs the energy?
10PlanetaryManifestationImprove / ProduceWhat is the proven result?
11SpectralReleaseDissolve / ReleaseWhat should be removed as a lost function?
12CrystallineCooperationDedication / UnificationHow does the result become common property?
13SpacePresenceSave/ExceedWhat is completed and transferred to the next cycle?

5. Hierarchy of cycles

CycleSizePurpose
Keen1One coordinate of state and action.
Harmonica4 chinaThe minimum block of four consecutive entries.
Wave13 kinOne full tone cycle.
Castle52 chinaFour waves.
Full Turn260 kinFive locks; all combinations of seals and tones.
Large Synchronous Circle18 980 daysCombination of 260 and 365 days; 52 solar years.

The score is consistent. The completion of the 13 position does not mean a stop: the result is fixed as a new initial state, after which the next cycle opens.

6. Kina account card

The card connects the semantic coordinate with the evidence circuit. It should be equally suitable for personal observation, project office, territorial pilot and interdepartmental system.

CodeFieldContents
01Write CodeK001 to K260; unique identifier.
02Date and cycleDate, wave, lock, full turn.
03ArchetypeSolar printing: what function is manifested.
04ToneStage of rhythm: how the function manifests itself.
05ContextA territory, object, project, person, or system.
06Baseline stateBaseline to solution.
07Purpose and challengeDesired state and the main contradiction.

Fields 08–13

CodeFieldContents
08Affected balanceOne or more of 19 Balance Sheets SUR.
09DecisionAccepted way of transition.
10Resource and ResponsibleFunds, data, authority, executor.
11Actionactually performed operation.
12EvidenceIndicator, document, measurement, verification.
13New StatusThe result, the deviation, the adjustment and the next cycle.

7. Two independent addresses: 260 and 741

INTEGRATION PRINCIPLE
260 encodes meaning and time; 741 encodes control and execution. These numbers do not replace each other.

ContourThe main questionFunction
CATALOGUE 260What is the function and what rhythm?20 Archetypes × 13 Tone.
KRISTALL741Where, in what phase and scale?19 Balance Sheets × 13 Phases × 3 Scale.
SUR‑810What's the calculated trail?Register of resource movements, commitments and results.
ESG‑IR 1.0What is the confirmed effect?Indicators, origin of data, validation and verification.
EQUILIBRIUMIs the balance restored?Monitoring, forecasting, control and adjustment.

A single record receives two addresses: a K‑code from matrix 260 and a management address, “balance × phase × scale”, from KRISTALL741. SUR‑810 stores the calculation trail, ESG‑IR 1.0 records the evidence for the result, and EQUILIBRIUM provides the overall assessment of the state.

8. The thirteen management phases of KRISTALL741

Thirteen tones and thirteen management phases form different layers. The tone describes the rhythm of manifestation; the phase is a mandatory control procedure. Coincidence of quantity allows them to be synchronized, but does not make the terms identical.

CodePhasePhase result
L01SignalMake a change or opportunity.
L02SourcesDetermine the origin of data and events.
L03VerificationVerify credibility and sufficiency.
L04BaselineRecord the initial state.
L05DiagnosticsDetermine the causes and structure of the deviation.
L06ScriptsBuild development options.
L07CorridorSet acceptable decision limits.
L08OptionsCompare ways to achieve the goal.
L09RightIdentify legal grounds and limitations.
L10ResourceSecure funding, people, data, and assets.
L11ImplementationImplement an agreed solution.
L12ValidationConfirm the result with evidence.
L13AdjustmentAdjust the system and open a new L01.

9. Record-keeping policy

Step 1. Fix the coordinate

Determine the number of the kin, archetype, tone, wave and lock.

Step 2. Describe the reality

Write context and initial state without interpretive substitutions.

Step 3. Identify the goal and challenge

To dispel the desired state, obstacle and criterion of success.

Step 4. Assign a management address

Specify the balance, phase and scale of KRISTALL741.

Step 5. Secure solution and resource

Appoint a person responsible, deadline, data, authority and resources.

Step 6. Confirm result

Attach an indicator, document, observation or validation act.

Step 7. Open a new cycle

Record the new state, deviation, and next coordinate.

10. Illustrative entry K001

The example shows the logic of filling in and is not a description of the real project.

FieldRecording
CodeK001
ArchetypeThe Red Dragon is the birth and life base.
Tone1. Magnetic is the target and attraction.
ContextLaunch of the territorial pilot of biocenosis monitoring.
Baseline stateThere is no single passport of the territory.
Purpose and challengeCreate an evidence-based surveillance circuit; agree on sources and responsibilities.
DecisionEstablish a pilot monitoring point and a unified register of indicators.
ResourceCommand, sensors, data, regulatory circuit, funding.
EvidencePassport points, measurement protocols, source validation.
New StatusBaseline is formed; a cycle of diagnostics and scenarios is opened.

11. Quality control and evidence

MonitoringRequirement
UnambiguityOne record - one identifier, one time and one responsible.
Origin of dataEach indicator is related to the source, method and time of receipt.
Separation of fact and interpretationObservation, conclusion and decision are kept separately.
VersionalityAdjustments do not erase history; a new version is being formed.
ValidationThe suitability of the method and the compliance of the result with the goal are checked.
VerificationThe correctness of the calculation and the availability of evidence are checked.
FeedbackThe result returns to the baseline of the next cycle.

12. Road map of implementation

StageContentsResult
Stage 1. CanonApprove dictionary 20 Archetypes, 13 tones, numbering rules and record passport.Version 1.0.
Stage 2. RosterCreate digital cards K001 to K260 and associate them with balances, phases and scales.Working prototype of the registry.
Stage 3. PilotConduct one complete 13-phase cycle on the selected project or territory.Proven procedure.
Stage 4. ValidationConfigure indicators, data origin, audit and ESG-IR 1.0.Proof circuit.
Stage 5. ScalingInclude the registry in EQUILIBRIUM and interdepartmental document management.A single system of cyclical control.

13. Sources and methodological framework

SourceUseLink / Status
Foundation for the Law of Time13 Moon Calendar Tutorial: 20 Solar Seals × 13 Galactic Tones = 260 combinations.https://lawoftime.org/thirteenmoon/tutorial.html
Foundation for the Law of TimeBook of Kin: Meditation sequence for 260 galactic signatures.https://www.lawoftime.org/timeshipearth/bookofkin.html
Foundation for the Law of TimePocket Calendar: list of 20 seals and 13 tones.https://lawoftime.org/wp-content/uploads/8-Moon-Year-Pocket-Calendar.pdf
EQUILIBRIUM / SURAuthor's applied architecture: 19 Balance Sheets × 13 Phases × 3 Scale = 741.Project Working Materials, 2026.

Annex A. Registry 260 kin

The register is built algorithmically. At each next step simultaneously increase the print index modulo 20 and tone index by module 13. The wave contains 13 kin, castle — 52, harmonica — 4.

Castle 1 · Part 1 · K001–K026

KeenSolar PrintingToneWavePositionCastleHarmonica
K001Red Dragon1. Magnetic1111
K002White Wind2. Lunar1211
K003Blue Night3. Electric1311
K004Yellow Seed4. Self-Subsisting1411
K005Red Serpent5. Overturning1512
K006White Connector of Worlds6. Rhythmic1612
K007The Blue Hand7. Resonance1712
K008The Yellow Star8. Galactica1812
K009Red Moon9. Solar1913
K010White Dog10. Planetary11013
K011Blue Monkey11. Spectral11113
K012Yellow Man12. Crystalline11213
K013Red Sky Wanderer13. Space11314
K014The White Wizard1. Magnetic2114
K015Blue Eagle2. Lunar2214
K016The Yellow Warrior3. Electric2314
K017Red Earth4. Self-Subsisting2415
K018White Mirror5. Overturning2515
K019Blue Storm6. Rhythmic2615
K020Yellow Sun7. Resonance2715
K021Red Dragon8. Galactica2816
K022White Wind9. Solar2916
K023Blue Night10. Planetary21016
K024Yellow Seed11. Spectral21116
K025Red Serpent12. Crystalline21217
K026White Connector of Worlds13. Space21317

Castle 1 · Part 2 · K027–K052

KeenSolar PrintingToneWavePositionCastleHarmonica
K027The Blue Hand1. Magnetic3117
K028The Yellow Star2. Lunar3217
K029Red Moon3. Electric3318
K030White Dog4. Self-Subsisting3418
K031Blue Monkey5. Overturning3518
K032Yellow Man6. Rhythmic3618
K033Red Sky Wanderer7. Resonance3719
K034The White Wizard8. Galactica3819
K035Blue Eagle9. Solar3919
K036The Yellow Warrior10. Planetary31019
K037Red Earth11. Spectral311110
K038White Mirror12. Crystalline312110
K039Blue Storm13. Space313110
K040Yellow Sun1. Magnetic41110
K041Red Dragon2. Lunar42111
K042White Wind3. Electric43111
K043Blue Night4. Self-Subsisting44111
K044Yellow Seed5. Overturning45111
K045Red Serpent6. Rhythmic46112
K046White Connector of Worlds7. Resonance47112
K047The Blue Hand8. Galactica48112
K048The Yellow Star9. Solar49112
K049Red Moon10. Planetary410113
K050White Dog11. Spectral411113
K051Blue Monkey12. Crystalline412113
K052Yellow Man13. Space413113

Castle 2 · Part 1 · K053–K078

KeenSolar PrintingToneWavePositionCastleHarmonica
K053Red Sky Wanderer1. Magnetic51214
K054The White Wizard2. Lunar52214
K055Blue Eagle3. Electric53214
K056The Yellow Warrior4. Self-Subsisting54214
K057Red Earth5. Overturning55215
K058White Mirror6. Rhythmic56215
K059Blue Storm7. Resonance57215
K060Yellow Sun8. Galactica58215
K061Red Dragon9. Solar59216
K062White Wind10. Planetary510216
K063Blue Night11. Spectral511216
K064Yellow Seed12. Crystalline512216
K065Red Serpent13. Space513217
K066White Connector of Worlds1. Magnetic61217
K067The Blue Hand2. Lunar62217
K068The Yellow Star3. Electric63217
K069Red Moon4. Self-Subsisting64218
K070White Dog5. Overturning65218
K071Blue Monkey6. Rhythmic66218
K072Yellow Man7. Resonance67218
K073Red Sky Wanderer8. Galactica68219
K074The White Wizard9. Solar69219
K075Blue Eagle10. Planetary610219
K076The Yellow Warrior11. Spectral611219
K077Red Earth12. Crystalline612220
K078White Mirror13. Space613220

Castle 2 · Part 2 · K079–K104

KeenSolar PrintingToneWavePositionCastleHarmonica
K079Blue Storm1. Magnetic71220
K080Yellow Sun2. Lunar72220
K081Red Dragon3. Electric73221
K082White Wind4. Self-Subsisting74221
K083Blue Night5. Overturning75221
K084Yellow Seed6. Rhythmic76221
K085Red Serpent7. Resonance77222
K086White Connector of Worlds8. Galactica78222
K087The Blue Hand9. Solar79222
K088The Yellow Star10. Planetary710222
K089Red Moon11. Spectral711223
K090White Dog12. Crystalline712223
K091Blue Monkey13. Space713223
K092Yellow Man1. Magnetic81223
K093Red Sky Wanderer2. Lunar82224
K094The White Wizard3. Electric83224
K095Blue Eagle4. Self-Subsisting84224
K096The Yellow Warrior5. Overturning85224
K097Red Earth6. Rhythmic86225
K098White Mirror7. Resonance87225
K099Blue Storm8. Galactica88225
K100Yellow Sun9. Solar89225
K101Red Dragon10. Planetary810226
K102White Wind11. Spectral811226
K103Blue Night12. Crystalline812226
K104Yellow Seed13. Space813226

Castle 3 · Part 1 · K105–K130

KeenSolar PrintingToneWavePositionCastleHarmonica
K105Red Serpent1. Magnetic91327
K106White Connector of Worlds2. Lunar92327
K107The Blue Hand3. Electric93327
K108The Yellow Star4. Self-Subsisting94327
K109Red Moon5. Overturning95328
K110White Dog6. Rhythmic96328
K111Blue Monkey7. Resonance97328
K112Yellow Man8. Galactica98328
K113Red Sky Wanderer9. Solar99329
K114The White Wizard10. Planetary910329
K115Blue Eagle11. Spectral911329
K116The Yellow Warrior12. Crystalline912329
K117Red Earth13. Space913330
K118White Mirror1. Magnetic101330
K119Blue Storm2. Lunar102330
K120Yellow Sun3. Electric103330
K121Red Dragon4. Self-Subsisting104331
K122White Wind5. Overturning105331
K123Blue Night6. Rhythmic106331
K124Yellow Seed7. Resonance107331
K125Red Serpent8. Galactica108332
K126White Connector of Worlds9. Solar109332
K127The Blue Hand10. Planetary1010332
K128The Yellow Star11. Spectral1011332
K129Red Moon12. Crystalline1012333
K130White Dog13. Space1013333

Castle 3 · Part 2 · K131–K156

KeenSolar PrintingToneWavePositionCastleHarmonica
K131Blue Monkey1. Magnetic111333
K132Yellow Man2. Lunar112333
K133Red Sky Wanderer3. Electric113334
K134The White Wizard4. Self-Subsisting114334
K135Blue Eagle5. Overturning115334
K136The Yellow Warrior6. Rhythmic116334
K137Red Earth7. Resonance117335
K138White Mirror8. Galactica118335
K139Blue Storm9. Solar119335
K140Yellow Sun10. Planetary1110335
K141Red Dragon11. Spectral1111336
K142White Wind12. Crystalline1112336
K143Blue Night13. Space1113336
K144Yellow Seed1. Magnetic121336
K145Red Serpent2. Lunar122337
K146White Connector of Worlds3. Electric123337
K147The Blue Hand4. Self-Subsisting124337
K148The Yellow Star5. Overturning125337
K149Red Moon6. Rhythmic126338
K150White Dog7. Resonance127338
K151Blue Monkey8. Galactica128338
K152Yellow Man9. Solar129338
K153Red Sky Wanderer10. Planetary1210339
K154The White Wizard11. Spectral1211339
K155Blue Eagle12. Crystalline1212339
K156The Yellow Warrior13. Space1213339

Castle 4 · Part 1 · K157–K182

KeenSolar PrintingToneWavePositionCastleHarmonica
K157Red Earth1. Magnetic131440
K158White Mirror2. Lunar132440
K159Blue Storm3. Electric133440
K160Yellow Sun4. Self-Subsisting134440
K161Red Dragon5. Overturning135441
K162White Wind6. Rhythmic136441
K163Blue Night7. Resonance137441
K164Yellow Seed8. Galactica138441
K165Red Serpent9. Solar139442
K166White Connector of Worlds10. Planetary1310442
K167The Blue Hand11. Spectral1311442
K168The Yellow Star12. Crystalline1312442
K169Red Moon13. Space1313443
K170White Dog1. Magnetic141443
K171Blue Monkey2. Lunar142443
K172Yellow Man3. Electric143443
K173Red Sky Wanderer4. Self-Subsisting144444
K174The White Wizard5. Overturning145444
K175Blue Eagle6. Rhythmic146444
K176The Yellow Warrior7. Resonance147444
K177Red Earth8. Galactica148445
K178White Mirror9. Solar149445
K179Blue Storm10. Planetary1410445
K180Yellow Sun11. Spectral1411445
K181Red Dragon12. Crystalline1412446
K182White Wind13. Space1413446

Castle 4 · Part 2 · K183–K208

KeenSolar PrintingToneWavePositionCastleHarmonica
K183Blue Night1. Magnetic151446
K184Yellow Seed2. Lunar152446
K185Red Serpent3. Electric153447
K186White Connector of Worlds4. Self-Subsisting154447
K187The Blue Hand5. Overturning155447
K188The Yellow Star6. Rhythmic156447
K189Red Moon7. Resonance157448
K190White Dog8. Galactica158448
K191Blue Monkey9. Solar159448
K192Yellow Man10. Planetary1510448
K193Red Sky Wanderer11. Spectral1511449
K194The White Wizard12. Crystalline1512449
K195Blue Eagle13. Space1513449
K196The Yellow Warrior1. Magnetic161449
K197Red Earth2. Lunar162450
K198White Mirror3. Electric163450
K199Blue Storm4. Self-Subsisting164450
K200Yellow Sun5. Overturning165450
K201Red Dragon6. Rhythmic166451
K202White Wind7. Resonance167451
K203Blue Night8. Galactica168451
K204Yellow Seed9. Solar169451
K205Red Serpent10. Planetary1610452
K206White Connector of Worlds11. Spectral1611452
K207The Blue Hand12. Crystalline1612452
K208The Yellow Star13. Space1613452

Castle 5 · Part 1 · K209–K234

KeenSolar PrintingToneWavePositionCastleHarmonica
K209Red Moon1. Magnetic171553
K210White Dog2. Lunar172553
K211Blue Monkey3. Electric173553
K212Yellow Man4. Self-Subsisting174553
K213Red Sky Wanderer5. Overturning175554
K214The White Wizard6. Rhythmic176554
K215Blue Eagle7. Resonance177554
K216The Yellow Warrior8. Galactica178554
K217Red Earth9. Solar179555
K218White Mirror10. Planetary1710555
K219Blue Storm11. Spectral1711555
K220Yellow Sun12. Crystalline1712555
K221Red Dragon13. Space1713556
K222White Wind1. Magnetic181556
K223Blue Night2. Lunar182556
K224Yellow Seed3. Electric183556
K225Red Serpent4. Self-Subsisting184557
K226White Connector of Worlds5. Overturning185557
K227The Blue Hand6. Rhythmic186557
K228The Yellow Star7. Resonance187557
K229Red Moon8. Galactica188558
K230White Dog9. Solar189558
K231Blue Monkey10. Planetary1810558
K232Yellow Man11. Spectral1811558
K233Red Sky Wanderer12. Crystalline1812559
K234The White Wizard13. Space1813559

Castle 5 · Part 2 · K235–K260

KeenSolar PrintingToneWavePositionCastleHarmonica
K235Blue Eagle1. Magnetic191559
K236The Yellow Warrior2. Lunar192559
K237Red Earth3. Electric193560
K238White Mirror4. Self-Subsisting194560
K239Blue Storm5. Overturning195560
K240Yellow Sun6. Rhythmic196560
K241Red Dragon7. Resonance197561
K242White Wind8. Galactica198561
K243Blue Night9. Solar199561
K244Yellow Seed10. Planetary1910561
K245Red Serpent11. Spectral1911562
K246White Connector of Worlds12. Crystalline1912562
K247The Blue Hand13. Space1913562
K248The Yellow Star1. Magnetic201562
K249Red Moon2. Lunar202563
K250White Dog3. Electric203563
K251Blue Monkey4. Self-Subsisting204563
K252Yellow Man5. Overturning205563
K253Red Sky Wanderer6. Rhythmic206564
K254The White Wizard7. Resonance207564
K255Blue Eagle8. Galactica208564
K256The Yellow Warrior9. Solar209564
K257Red Earth10. Planetary2010565
K258White Mirror11. Spectral2011565
K259Blue Storm12. Crystalline2012565
K260Yellow Sun13. Space2013565

Another published edition: LEDGER Schetnaia_kniga_Arhetipy_i_cikly.pptx · web text +

Archetypes · Cycles · Kin Registry 260

20 Archetypes × 13 Tone = 260

Coordinates of meaning and time

Concept: Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov

Edition · 1.0 2026

Main definition

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

A ledger is a register of the movement of time, meanings, decisions, resources, actions, and proven results.

TIME

MEANING

DECISION

RESOURCE

RESULT

When the coordinate is

What function is shown

What transition is accepted

What action is taken

How the change is confirmed

The unit of account is kin: a unique pair of "archetype + tons of cycle".

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

260

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

Basic architecture 13×20

ARCHETIPOV

TONOVA

KINOV

What's manifesting?

How and at what stage?

Unique coordinate

Archetype(K) = ((K − 1) mod 20) + 1; tone(K) = ((K − 1) mod 13) + 1

13 and 20 are mutually simple, so all combinations pass once in 260 steps.

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

Twenty archetypes · 1–10

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

The archetype asks a qualitative function and an operational question: "What manifests?"

Red Dragon

White Connector of Worlds

Birth · Being · Caring

Transition · Equivalent · Liberation

White Wind

The Blue Hand

Spirit · Breath · Communication

Knowledge · healing · completion

Blue Night

The Yellow Star

Depth · Intuition · Abundance

Beauty · art · harmony

Yellow Seed

Red Moon

Design · target · potential

Purification · water · current

Red Serpent

White Dog

Lifeforce · conservation

Heart · Love · Loyalty

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

Twenty archetypes · 11–20

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

The archetype asks a qualitative function and an operational question: "What manifests?"

Blue Monkey

The Yellow Warrior

Game · creation · illusion

Reasonability · Fearlessness · Question

Yellow Man

Red Earth

Free Will · Wisdom

Navigation · synchronicity · evolution

Red Sky Wanderer

White Mirror

Space · study

Order · reflection · infinity

The White Wizard

Blue Storm

Latency · susceptibility

Conversion · self-renewal

Blue Eagle

Yellow Sun

Vision · Mind · Future

Life · Clarity · Universal Fire

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

Thirteen tone cycle

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

The tone sets the rhythm of manifestation: from purpose and challenge to cooperation and presence.

Magnetic

Galactica

Target · to attract

Integrity · to harmonize

Lunar

Solar

Call · to stabilize

Intention · realize

Electric

Planetary

Service · Activate

Manifestation ·

Self-Subsisting

Spectral

Form · Measure

Release ·

Overturning

Crystalline

Power · Control

Collaboration ·

Rhythmic

Space

Equality ·

Presence · save

Resonance

Setup · to inspire

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

260

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

Hierarchy of cycles

KIN

HARMONICA

VOLNA

CASTLE

RETURN

one coordinate

minimum block

full tone cycle

Four Waves

five castles

18 980 days

Large Synchronous Circle

260 × 365 days · 52 the Solar Year

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

Cine account card · 13 fields

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

IDENTITY

01–04

Code · date and cycle · archetype · tons

CONTACTS

05–07

Context · source state · target and call

GOVERNANCE

08–11

Balance · solution · resource and responsible · action

PROOF

12–13

Confirmation of result · new status

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

Two independent addresses: 260 and 741

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

260 encodes meaning and time; 741 — Management and execution. Numbers do not replace each other.

CONTOUR

MAIN ISSUE

FUNCTION

CATALOGUE 260

What is the function and what rhythm?

20 Archetypes × 13 Tone

KRISTALL741

Where, in what phase and scale?

19 Balance Sheets × 13 Phases × 3 Scale

SUR-810

What's the calculated trail?

Resources · liabilities · results

ESG-IR 1.0

What is the confirmed effect?

Indicators · origin · validation

EQUILIBRIUM

Is the balance restored?

Observation · prediction · control · correction

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

Thirteen management phases of KRISTALL741

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

The tone describes the rhythm of manifestation; the phase is a mandatory control procedure.

Signal

Options

L01

L08

modification

comparison

Sources

Right

L02

L09

origin

Reasons

Verification

Resource

L03

L10

Credibility

security

Baseline

Implementation

L04

L11

initial state

action

Diagnostics

Validation

L05

L12

Reasons

Proof

Scripts

Adjustment

L06

L13

Options for the future

new cycle

Corridor

L07

Borders

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

Record keeping rule · 7 steps

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

COORDINAT

REALITY

PURPOSE AND CHALLENGES

ADDRESS 741

Kin · Archetype · Ton · Wave

context and baseline without substitutions

desired state and criterion

Balance · phase · scale

DECISION AND RESOURCES

PROOF

NEW CYCLE

responsible · term · powers

indicator · document · validation

Total · Deviation · Adjustment

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

K001

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

Illustrative entry K001

CONTACTS

Launch of the territorial pilot of biocenosis monitoring.

BASELINE

Distinct data; no single territory passport.

Red Dragon

PURPOSE

Create an evidence-based surveillance circuit.

1. Magnetic

DECISION

Pilot monitoring point and a single register of indicators.

Birth and Life Foundation

Purpose and Attraction

RESOURCE

· Sensors · Data · regulatory circuit.

PROOF

Passport Point · protocols · source validation.

The example shows the logic of filling in and does not describe the real project.

NEW STATE

Baseline is formed; diagnostic cycle is opened.

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

Quality control and evidence

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

The record is considered completed only when the decision has left a verifiable mark.

SINGLENESS

VALIDATION

one entry · one identifier · One is responsible

The method is suitable, the result corresponds to the goal

ORIGIN

VERIFICATION

source · method · time of receipt

The calculation is correct, the evidence is attached

FACT ≠ INTERPRETATION

FEEDBACK

observation, conclusion and decision are kept separately

the result becomes the baseline of the next cycle

VERSION

Adjustment does not erase history

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

Road map of implementation

LEDGER · EQUILIBRIUM

CANON

REGISTER

PILOT

VALIDATION

MASSHTAB

Dictionary and Passport

Cards K001 - K260

one 13-phase cycle

indicators and audit

EQUILIBRIUM

The ledger turns the symbolic matrix into a controlled cycle: coordinates → solution → resource → proof → new state.

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · 2026

Sources cited in presentation 6

  • https://lawoftime.org/thirteenmoon/tutorial.html
  • [/Sources]
  • Project architecture EQUILIBRIUM / SUR, 2026 (author's model).
  • https://lawoftime.org/wp-content/uploads/8-Moon-Year-Pocket-Calendar.pdf
  • https://www.lawoftime.org/timeshipearth/bookofkin.html
  • Project architecture EQUILIBRIUM / SUR, 2026 (illustrational author's example).

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

SOYUZ741 Graph Theory

Source Status: Primary Document

The material describes the application of the graph model to the connections, objects and contours of the "SOYUZ741" system.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/teoriya-grafov-soyuz-741

Open on the site

Version 1.0 · 2026

1. Purpose of the document

The document forms a single framework of Graph Theory SOYUZ741 and links the classical mathematical apparatus of graph theory with the author's model of Field Theory. The classical part is based on generally accepted definitions: vertices, edges, paths, cycles, connectivity, centrality, contiguity matrices, weighted and oriented graphs. The author’s part introduces an applied interpretation: nodes of meaning, multilayer fields, state dynamics, intervention operator, Globus Smyslov and AI-contour of analysis.

Principle of scientific correctness: Mathematical definitions and metrics are separated from conceptual extensions SOYUZ741. Numerical weights in the semantic matrix are parameters of the model and should be calibrated on expert assessments, observational data or a specially defined technique.

1.1. Main objective

  • translate the language "nodes - links - field" into a formalized system;
  • create a matrix of semantic connections and a passport of nodes;
  • describe the dynamics of strengthening, degradation and restructuring of the graph;
  • introduce an algorithm for managing connectivity;
  • prepare the basis for computing and AI-models SOYUZ741.

2. Classical Graph Theory: The Mathematical Core

A graph is a mathematical structure that describes a set of objects and the relationships between them. In the most common entry, the graph is set by a pair of multiple vertices and multiple edges.

The oriented graph distinguishes the direction of communication; the weighted graph further specifies the numerical weight of the edge. Multigraph allows multiple edges between one pair of vertices. A multilayer graph describes several types or layers of relationships between the same objects.

2.1. Basic concepts

ConceptFormal meaningInterpretation
Top (vertex)Graph Objectperson, organization, idea, event
Rib (edge)The relationship between the topsinfluence, flow, dependence, exchange
DegreeNumber of top linksLocal Connection
PathRib SequenceRoute of Influence Transfer
CycleClosed Pathfeedback loop
Connectivity componentA related fragment of the graphCluster / Subsystem
Bridgerib, the removal of which increases the number of componentscritical channel
Articulation Pointa node whose removal violates connectivitycritical node
CentralityA family of metrics of structural importancecenter of influence, intermediary, hub

2.2. Contiguity Matrix

For a graph with n vertices, the adjacency matrix A is n×n. The element aᵢⱼ shows the presence or weight of a connection from vertex i to vertex j. For a directed graph, the matrix is generally unsymmetrical.

2.3. Metrics of Centrality

For the analysis of SOYUZ741, it is advisable to use several metrics simultaneously. No centrality is universal.

  • Degree centrality: how many direct connections a node has.
  • Centrality of mediation (betweenness): how often a node lies on the shortest paths and serves as a bridge.
  • Closeness: How short are the paths from the node to the other vertices.
  • Eigenvector: How connected a node is to other influential nodes.
  • PageRank-like scores: recursive significance given directions and weights.

3. Transition from graph to field theory SOYUZ741

In SOYUZ741, the graph is considered as a formal skeleton of coherence, and the "Field" is considered as an extended model in which node states, flow types, layers, rhythms, and temporal evolution are added to the graph structure. This is an author's extension, not a standard definition of mathematical graph theory.

3.1. Transition formula

Conceptual chain of the system:

4. Smyslov graph: kernel of 21 node

CodeNodeLayerFunction
N01SourceCoreModel reference category limit
N02TruthCoreConformity and verification criteria
N03MeaningCoreThe organizing principle of interpretation
N04ConsciousnessCoreperception and choice
N05EnergyCoreResource/Intensity of the Process
N06LoveCoreConnecting Value Category
N07WillCoreAbility to initiate action
N08PersonSystemmain agent and assembly node
N09FamilySystembasic reproducing social unit
N10CommunitySystemLocal cooperative network
N11CultureSystemmechanism of transmission of norms and meanings
N12EducationSystemKnowledge and competence transfer loop
N13EconomySystemExchange, Resources and Production Circuit
N14StateSystemInstitutional Management Outline
N15CreativityEvolutionarygeneration of new solutions and forms
N16TechnologyEvolutionaryMaterialization of knowledge and methods
N17CooperationEvolutionaryStrengthening through joint action
N18FairnessEvolutionaryprinciple of distribution and legitimacy
N19FreedomEvolutionarySpace of choice and initiative
N20ResponsibilityEvolutionaryfeedback of choice and consequences
N21FutureEvolutionaryTargeted Scenario Space

4.1. Types of meaningful edges

CodeTypeArea of workMeaning
R1GeneratesA → BB arises as a consequence of
R2AmplifiesA → BGrowth A Increases Potential B
R3RestrictsA ⊣ BA inhibits excessive growth B
R4TransformsA ⇢ BA changes mode or quality B
R5Mutually EnhanceA ↔ BBilateral positive relationship
R6ConflictingA ↯ BTension/competition modes
R7TransmitsA → Bchannel of information, resource or influence

5. Core Connection Matrix

The following is a working 21×21 Weight matrix. Values 0–10 are model parameters, not empirically proven constants. The matrix is used as a starting hypothesis for subsequent calibration.

→N01N02N03N04N05N06N07N08N09N10N11N12N13N14N15N16N17N18N19N20N21
N010109080000000000000000
N020010800000007000000000
N030001000090088000000008
N040000008100000007000000
N05000000770000500600000
N06000000089700000000000
N07000000080000007060000
N08000000009087708000880
N09000000000887000000000
N10000000000070050090000
N11000000088709068007007
N12000000070090608800008
N13000000070000080880007
N14000000000000800009076
N15000000000080000900009
N16000000000000800000009
N17000000000900800000009
N18000000000000090000780
N19000000080000008000097
N20000000080000070000908
N21000000000000000000000

Legend: string is the source of influence, column is the receiving node; 0 is not specified; 1–3 is weak; 4–6 is average; 7–8 is strong; 9–10 is critical/carrying.

5.1. How to interpret the matrix

  • The sum of a line is a rough indicator of the outgoing model influence.
  • The column sum is a rough indicator of dependence on other nodes.
  • A pair of high mutual weights indicates the contour of positive feedback.
  • High dependence with a small number of alternative inputs indicates potential fragility.
  • Before use, weight solutions must undergo expert and/or empirical validation.
№Outgoing influenceΣ outInbound dependencyΣ in
1N11 Culture60N08 Person80
2N08 Person55N21 Future78
3N12 Education46N11 Culture48
4N03 Meaning43N15 Creativity46
5N13 Economics38N13 Economics42
6N19 Freedom32N12 Education38
7N20 Responsibility32N14 State35

6. Graph Dynamics

Dynamic model introduces state xᵢ(t) for each node. At each stroke, the state changes under the influence of neighbors, their own processes, losses and external control. In the practical version, values should be normalized, for example, in the range of 0…1 or 0…100.

For real systems, the linear model is often insufficient: positive feedbacks can create unlimited growth. Therefore, it is advisable to use a limiting nonlinearity, saturation or logistic function in the computational implementation.

6.1. Three Dynamics Modes

ModeWhat's going onSystemic effect
Growthconnections and connections are strengthened; new routes are emergingEnhanced connectivity without loss of stability
DegradationWeakening of critical nodes or bridgesCascade losses, fragmentation
Alterationthe center and routes are shiftingChange structure while maintaining function

6.2. Cascades and feedback

Cascades occur when a change in one node is transmitted along a chain and changes other nodes. Formally, this corresponds to successive multiplications by the adjacency/influence matrix. The presence of cycles creates feedbacks: positive feedback or negative feedback.

7. Graph Management Operator

Field operator is the author's application circuit that translates the diagnosis of a graph into actions. It does not replace substantive expertise: the task of the operator is to form a transparent cycle of observation, risk assessment, scenario calculation and controlled intervention.

  1. Identify nodes and real connections.
  2. Classify links by type, direction and sign.
  3. Evaluate the weight and credibility of each assessment.
  4. Calculate centralities, bridges, joint points and components.
  5. Identify overloads, tears, isolation and parasitic contours.
  6. Build a basic scenario without intervention.
  7. Develop options for intervention.
  8. Calculate direct, secondary and cascade effects.
  9. Choose an action according to the criterion of effect, risk and cost.
  10. Update the data and repeat the cycle.

7.1. Twelve operators

CodeControllerPurpose
O1Add NodeIntroduction of a new function/subject
O2Remove NodeWithdrawal of a non-function or harmful function
O3Reinforce the ribIncrease capacity/trust
O4Relax the ribReduce Unwanted Impact
O5Change directionReconfigure Control Outline
O6Creating a BridgeConnect isolated clusters
O7Split Clusterreduce monolith and systemic risk
O8Merge ClustersCreate a single outline
O9Select CenterCreating a Coordination Function
O10Distribute LoadReducing dependence on a single hub
O11Start the cyclecreate a sustainable feedback
O12Stabilizeintroduce a limitation and compensatory relationship

8. Globus Smyslov

Globus Smyslov is a visual-conceptual shell for a multilayer graph. This is not a mathematical necessity, but an interface that allows you to see the core, the social equator, the outer civilization layers and the flows between them.

ZoneNodesFunction
CentreSource, Truth, Meaning, Consciousness, Energy, Love, Willload-bearing categories
Inner RingMan, Freedom, Responsibility, Creativityagency and choice
The social equatorFamily, Community, Culture, Education, CooperationDaily Tissue Communication
System BeltEconomy, State, Technology, JusticeInstitutional arrangements
External horizonThe future and development scenariosDirection of evolution

8.1. The Three Axis Globe

  • Vertical manifestation: Source → Truth → Meaning → Consciousness → Man → system → Future.
  • Horizontal Linkage: Person ↔ Family ↔ Community ↔ Culture ↔ State.
  • Time Axis: Memory/Heritage → present action → project → future scenario.

9. AI-model neurograph field

AI should work as an analytical layer over a graph base, not as an autonomous source of truth. Its functions are to extract and classify nodes and connections from data, calculate metrics, look for anomalies, model scenarios, explain recommendations, and save history of changes.

9.1. Minimum data structure

ObjectFieldsPurpose
Nodeid, name, type, layer, state, confidence, sourceNode Passport
Edgesource, target, relation, weight, sign, confidence, sourcethe Communication Passport
Snapshottimestamp, node_states, edge_weightsCounting in time
Interventiontarget, operation, magnitude, cost, ownerManaging impact
Evidencesource_id, date, method, qualityevidence base

9.2. Computational Outline Architecture

  • Data layer: documents, registers, sensors, expert assessments.
  • Normalization layer: a single classifier of nodes, links and scales.
  • Graph storage: nodes, edges, versions and sources of evidence.
  • Analytical engine: centralities, components, bridges, communities, sustainability.
  • Scenario engine: simulation of changes in states and weights.
  • AI-assistant: explanation, search for hypotheses and the formation of options for action.
  • Contour of validation: expert confirmation, quality metrics, audit.

9.3. Pseudocode of one stroke

10. Validation and scientific discipline

In order for Graph Theory SOYUZ741 to be used as a research or management tool, it is necessary to separate: (a) the definition of a node; (b) the hypothesis of connection; (c) numerical weight; (d) the data source; (e) the level of confidence; (e) the result of the test. Without this, the graph remains a conceptual map.

10.1. Passport of each link

FieldWhat is fixed
SourceWhich node affects
GoalWhich node has influence
Typeamplifies / restricts / transmits / conflicts
Weight0–10 or normalized scale
Symbol+ / − / mixed
DelayHow many bars does the effect appear?
Datadocuments, statistics, sensorics, expert evaluation
Confidencee.g. 0...1
Method of verificationcorrelation, experiment, expert panel, scenario test
Update DateRelevance of Assessment

10.2. Model quality criteria

  • Transparency: Each number has a source and an explanation.
  • Reproducibility: Another analyst can repeat the calculation.
  • Resilience: Small changes to the input do not cause unreasonably large changes to the result.
  • Prognostic testability: scenarios can be compared with subsequent observations.
  • Separation of facts and norms: "what is" does not mix with "how it should be".
  • Human Control: Recommendations AI are not accepted as decisions without a responsible subject.

11. Communication with architecture SOYUZ741

Graph theory can become an end-to-end mathematical language SOYUZ741: each registry module is represented by a node or cluster; inter-module dependencies are represented by edges; indicators are represented by states; formulas are represented by transition operators; data are represented by an evidential layer; and validation criteria are represented by rules for allowing communication in a working model.

After certification of modules 741, the system can be represented not only by an ordinary graph, but also by a hypergraph, where one hyperrebre connects several modules at once within a process, project, program or overall result.

12. Road map of development

StageContourWorkResult
Stage 1Core 21clarify the passports of nodes and communicationsstable version of the matrix
Stage 2Calibrationexpert evaluation + dataReasonable Weights and Confidence
Stage 3DynamicsDetermine transition statuses and functionsscript simulator
Stage 4Globus Smyslovmake an interactive interface3D/2D Layer Map
Stage 5SOYUZ741reveal 741 module and intercomHypergraph System
Stage 6NEUROGRAPHAI-analysis, explanation and recommendationsOperational Analytical Circuit
Stage 7ValidationPilots and Comparative Analysisproven application methodology

13. Summary of key formulas

ObjectFormulaPurpose
CountG=(V,E)Classical structure
Weighted CountG=(V,E,W)Weight of Connections
Expanded Count𝓖(t)=(V,E,W,L,X(t),R)Author's model SOYUZ741
Statex(t+1)=σ(Aᵀx(t)+Bu(t)+b)Dynamics
CascadeΔx(k)≈(Aᵀ)ᵏΔx(0)Spread of indignation
Module 741Mₖ={code, function, indicators, data, formula, links, validation}Registry Passport

14. Final architecture

In the collected model, a sequence is formed: The knot theory defines entities; the edge theory describes relationships; Graph theory formalizes the network; dynamics dictates change. Globus Smyslov creates an interface of holistic vision; The Field Operator sets the intervention cycle; Neurograph provides calculation and AI-analysis; hypergraph SOYUZ741 integrates the module registry into a single architecture.

15. Working definition

Status: Conceptual and mathematical module of Field Theory. The transition to the scientific and applied standard requires weight calibration, formal measurement methodology and independent validation.

Other published edition: Graph Theory SOYUZ741 Mathematical apparatus of connectedness and field theory Theory_Counts_Unions741_Presentation.pptx · Web Text +

1. Main idea

From the mathematical graph to the controlled field model

Count

Dynamics

Field

Formal frame: tops, edges, weights, directions.

The conditions of the nodes change over time under the influence of neighbors and management.

Author's expansion: layers, flows, rhythms, meanings and scenarios.

UZEL → COMMUNICATIONS → GRAF → DYNAMICS → Fields

2. Classical Graph Theory

The mathematical core on which the extension SOYUZ741 is built

G = (V, E)

V - many tops

E - many edges

Oriented, weighted, multi- and multi-layered graphs

Contiguity Matrix

A = [aᵢⱼ] is the presence or weight of a bond from i to j.

Centrality

Degree • Betweenness • Closeness • Eigenvector • PageRank

Connectivity

Paths • Cycles • Components • Bridges • Articulation points

3. Count Smyslov: 21 knot

Three Rings of the Core

NUCLEAR

SYSTEM RING

EVOLUTIONARY RING

N01 Source

N02 Truth

N03 Meaning

N04 Consciousness

N05 Energy

N06 Love

N07 Will

N08 Person

N09 Family

N10 Community

N11 Culture

N12 Education

N13 Economics

N14 State

N15 Creativity

N16 Technology

N17 Cooperation

N18 Justice

N19 Freedom

N20 Responsibility

N21 Future

4. Rib Typology

Communication must be of type, direction, sign and weight

R1 - Generates

R2 - Enhances

R3 - Limits

A → B B

A → B Height A Increases Potential B

A ⊣ B A inhibits excessive growth B

R4 - Transforms

R5 - Reciprocal amplification

R6 - Conflicting

A ⇢ B A changes mode or quality B

A ↔ B two-way positive

A ↯ B Voltage / Competition Modes

5. Matrix of connections 21×21

Impact starter model; weights 0–10 require calibration and validation

The most influential

N11 Culture — Σout 60 N08 Man — Σout 55 N12 Education — Σout 46 N03 Meaning — Σout 43 N13 Economy — Σout 38

How to read

Line = outgoing influence Column = incoming dependence

6. Graph Dynamics

The state of the node changes under the influence of the network, loss and external control

x(t+1) = σ(Aᵀx(t) + Bu(t) + b)

Aᵀx(t)

Bu(t)

influence of neighboring nodes and graph structure

External management impact

Restriction / Nonlinearity / Saturation

7. Three Dynamics Modes

GROWTH

DEGRADATION

RECONSTRUCTION

Nodes and connections are strengthened; new contours appear. Objective: to increase connectivity without loss of resilience.

Weakens critical nodes and bridges. Risk: Cascading loss, fragmentation.

Centers and routes are shifting. Result: change of structure while maintaining the function.

Δx(k) ≈ (Aᵀ)ᵏ Δx(0) — Cascade spreads over the network

8. Graph Management Operator

Cycle: observation → diagnosis → scenario → intervention → verification

1. Nodes and communications

2. Types and weights

3. Centralities and bridges

4. Breaks and overloads

5. Basic scenario

6. Intervention options

7. Cascade effects

8. Choice of action

9. Data update

10. New cycle

9. Twelve Field Operators

Basic language of structural intervention

O1 Add Node

O2 Remove Node

O3 Reinforce rib

O4 Weaken rib

O5 Change direction

O6 Create bridge

O7 Split Cluster

O8 Merge Clusters

O9 Select center

O10 Distribute Load

O11 Run cycle

O12 Stabilize

10. Globus Smyslov

Multilayer Graph Interface

Vertical

Source → Truth → Meaning → Consciousness → Man → Future

Horizontal

Person ↔ Family ↔ Community ↔ Culture ↔ State

Here's the time

Legacy → action → project → future scenario

Meaning

Not a mathematical necessity, but a visual shell of holistic vision.

11. Field Neurograph

AI - Analytical layer above the graph base, not an autonomous source of truth

DATA

Documents • registers • sensors • expert evaluations

NORMALIZATION

Classifier of nodes, links and scales

GRAPHIC STORAGE

Nodes • edges • versions • proofs

ANALYTICS

Centralities • bridges • communities • sustainability

SCENARIA

Simulation of states and weights

AI-ASSISTENT

Hypotheses • explanations • options

VALIDATION

Expert Confirmation • Audit • Quality

12. Validation and scientific discipline

For a graph to become a tool, each number must have an origin.

Transparency is the source of every number

Reproduction - calculation is repeated

Resilience — no unreasonable explosive effects

Prognostic testability

Separation of facts and norms

Human Control Solutions AI

Passport of each link

Source → Purpose Link type Weight Sign Data source Level of confidence Verification date Responsible

13. Communication with architecture SOYUZ741

From 21 kernel nodes to 741 module registry

MODULE 741

Node / Cluster

Inter-modular ribs

Indicators = states

Formula = operators

Data = evidence

Validation = model tolerance

HYPERGRAPH SOYUZ741

14. Road map of development

Transition from a conceptual map to a computing system

Core 21

Calibration

Dynamics

Globus

NEUROGRAPH

Register 741

Hypergraph

clarify passports and communications

Experts + data

Transition Functions and Simulator

2D/3D interface

analytic AI-contour

Scaling

multi-subject processes

15. Final architecture

Graph theory as a cross-cutting language of coherence

Knots → FISH → GRAF → DYNAMICS → Fields → OPERATOR → NEUROGRAPH → HYPERGRAPH 741

Scientific status

Goal

Classical graph mathematics + is an author's extension of Field Theory. Weights and causal relationships require calibration and independent validation.

Go from describing connectivity to measuring, scenario analysis, and controlled change of complex systems.

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

Node Theory in SOYUZ741 and EQUILIBRIUM

Source Status: Primary Document

The author’s interpretation of nodes as points where functions, resources and responsibility are concentrated within a connected system.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/teoriya-uzlov-soyuz-741

Open on the site

"A node is a place where multiplicity becomes a system."

Canonical edition 1.0 • 2026

1. Status and designation

Nodes theory is a system module of field theory that describes the points of concentration of connections, flows, memory, functions and directions of development. In architecture SOYUZ741, it serves as a language for designing, diagnosing, and coordinating complex systems.

  • Navigation: Identifying assembly centers and key connections.
  • Diagnostics: Identification of weak, overloaded, conflict and isolated nodes.
  • Design: creating new institutions, platforms, projects and contours.
  • Coordination: the connection of individual elements into a network and a network into a whole organism.

2. Basic definition

A node is a point of concentration of connections and flows in which the field acquires a stable function, memory, boundary and vector of development.

UZEL = Code + Center + Channels + Streams + Memory + Function + Sustainability + Vector

3. Anatomy of the node

№ElementContents
1CodeUnique name and identification principle
2CentreCore Concentration and Acceptance Function
3BorderLimits of sustainability and responsibility
4ChannelsLinks with other nodes
5Streamsinformation, resources, energy, people, decisions, meanings
6Memoryaccumulated experience and history of states
7Functionrole of the node in the common system
8Vectordirection of further development

4. Condition and maturity of the node

  1. 0. Potential - function is not yet manifested.
  2. 1. Sleeping - the structure exists, the activity is minimal.
  3. 2. Forming - connections arise, stability is low.
  4. 3. Active - the node skips and converts streams.
  5. 4. Mature - stably performs the function and strengthens neighboring nodes.
  6. 5. Network - acts as part of a sustainable circuit.
  7. 6. Retains a significant part of the system.
  8. 7. Nuclear - affects the architecture of the system as a whole.

5. The Twelve Laws of Nodes Theory

1. The law of intersection occurs where two or more significant flows occur.

2. Law of Tension: A stable node holds a difference of potentials, interests, or resources.

3. The Law of Memory: Each node retains a trace of past states and decisions.

4. Law of Bandwidth. Any node has a limit on the amount of threads that can be recycled.

5. The law of crystallization, repeated stable connections turn a node into a support system.

6. Resonance Law: Similar nodes reinforce each other when agreeing on a frequency, purpose, or language.

7. The law of Hierarchy. nodes form networks, networks - contours, contours - supersystems.

8. The Law of Unfolding: Overloading leads to the destruction, separation, or restructuring of a node.

9. Law of Substitution: The system seeks to create a compensating node when a key function is lost.

10. A complex system forms one or more coordination centers.

11. The law of evolution develops through a change in the quality of the function, not just the scale.

12. The Law of Inheritance: After a node decays, it leaves code, memory, and connections for future reassembly.

6. Eight classes and 64 base nodes

ClassEight knots
I. Source1 Pulse • 2 Idea • 3 Inspiration • 4 Vision • 5 Appeal • 6 Design • 7 Iskra • 8 Home
II. Meaning9 Myth • 10 Symbol • 11 Teaching • 12 Codex • 13 Law • 14 Manifesto • 15 Doctrine • 16 Mission
III. Knowledge17 Memory • 18 Archive • 19 Academy • 20 School • 21 University • 22 Study • 23 Laboratory • 24 Library
IV. Communications25 Language • 26 Letter • 27 Mail • 28 Signal • 29 Internet • 30 Platform • 31 Neural network • 32 Metaset
V. Organization33 Family • 34 Rod • 35 Community • 36 Cooperative • 37 Institute • 38 State • 39 Union • 40 Assembly
VI. Production41 Farming • 42 Craft • 43 Factory • 44 Factory • 45 Energy • 46 Logistics • 47 Industry • 48 Technosystem
VII. Harmonization49 Art • 50 Culture • 51 Music • 52 Architecture • 53 Medicine • 54 Ecology • 55 Ethics • 56 Beauty
VIII. Transition57 Crisis • 58 The Awakening • 59 Reform • 60 Revolution • 61 Breakthrough • 62 Transformation • 63 Rebirth • 64 New cycle

7. Matrix 8×8

64 Nodes form not just a list, but a matrix: eight functional classes × Eight levels of position. This allows you to compare nodes by role, maturity, inputs, outputs and effects on neighboring contours.

Class12345678
SourceImpulseIdeaInspirationVisionAppealIdeaIskraStart
MeaningMythSymbolTeachingCodexLawManifestoDoctrineMission
KnowledgeMemoryArchiveAcademySchoolUniversityResearchLaboratoryLibrary
ContactLanguageLetterMailSignalInternetPlatformNeural networkMetaset
OrganizationFamilyRodCommunityCooperativeInstituteStateUnionAssembly
ProductionFarmingCraftFactoryFactoryEnergyLogisticsIndustryTechnosystem
HarmonizationArtCultureMusicArchitectureMedicineEcologyEthicsBeauty
TransitionCrisisThe AwakeningReformRevolutionBreakthroughTransformationRebirthNew cycle

8. SOYUZ741: Modular Registry Architecture

SOYUZ741 is a modular add-on above the map of 64 nodes. The number 741 is used here as a fixed registry capacity: each module receives a unique code, function, connections, indicators, data and validation criteria.

64 Base Nodes → Functional Modules → nuclear contours → 741 Registry Position

9. Passport of the node

  • Code and name
  • Class and field of belongings
  • Main Function
  • Subfunctions
  • Incoming flows
  • Outgoing flows
  • Related nodes
  • Resources and media
  • Status indicators
  • Maturity level 0–7
  • Risks of overload
  • Development potential
  • Connected modules SOYUZ741
  • Validation criteria
  • Responsible contour

10. Module passport SOYUZ741

FieldContents
CodeEnd-to-end unique module number
Nameshort functional name
Nodeone or more of 64 base nodes
Typesemantic / organizational / digital / legal / scientific / economic / cultural
PurposeMeasurable module result
Inputsdata, resources, signals
Exitssolutions, products, state changes
IndicatorsKPI/Quality and impact metrics
Connectionsdependencies and interfaces
Validationconditions of confirmation of working capacity

11. Crystal SOYUZ741

Crystal SOYUZ741 is a visual and computational model in which 64 nodes form a spatial framework and 741 module is an internal functional lattice.

  • Core: mission, vision, coordination and analytics.
  • Inner Rings: Meaning, Knowledge, and Connection.
  • Middle rings: organization and production.
  • External rings: harmonization and transition.
  • Ribs: dependencies, flows, and amplification/conflict relationships.

12. Crystal Axes

  • Source → Meaning → Knowledge → Communication: formation of the intelligence of the system.
  • Family → Community → Cooperative → State → Union: Scaling the organization.
  • Agriculture → Craft → Industry → Technosystem: development of the production circuit.
  • Art → Culture → Ethics → Beauty: the contour of quality and harmonization.
  • Crisis → Awakening → Reform → Breakthrough → Transformation → New Cycle: The Outline of Evolution.

13. Control Core

The kernel does not replace the nodes, but coordinates them. In EQUILIBRIUM, it can be implemented as an analytical circuit that observes the status of the registry, identifies deviations, calculates priorities and forms action scenarios.

FunctionResult
ObservationStatus of nodes, flows and indicators
Diagnosticsbottlenecks, conflicts, isolation, overload
ForecastPossible transitions and cascade effects
PrioritizationWhich nodes to strengthen first
CoordinationWho, what and in what order does
Feedbackevaluation of the result and adjustment

14. Network Diagnostics

StateCharacteristics
Healthy nodeclear function, sufficient connections, adequate load, measurable output
Weak nodeblurred function, low connectivity, dependence on external impulse
Overloadedtoo many inputs, delays, role conflicts, reduced quality solutions
Isolatedfunction is available, but there are no necessary interfaces with the network
False nodehigh visibility with low system contribution
Transitionalold function is no longer effective, new is not yet stable

15. Five node management operations

  1. Find is to define the real center of the function, not the formal name.
  2. Describe — record passport, borders, entrances, exits and connections.
  3. To measure — to assign indicators of condition, load and result.
  4. Connect - embed the node in the desired contours and flow routes.
  5. Reassemble - change a function or architecture when overloaded and obsolete.

16. Dynamics of nodes

The map of the nodes should be dynamic. For each moment of time, the system stores the state of the node, load, quality of connections, and direction of change. This turns a static map into a model of the observed field.

Field → Stream → Node → Network → Contour → Core → New cycle

17. Example: node 36 "Cooperative"

FieldExample
FunctionJoint organization of resources, labour and responsibility
Inputsparticipants, needs, competencies, assets, projects
Exitsproducts, services, employment, mutual assistance, capital cooperation
Key connections35 Community, 37 Institute, 46 Logistics, 47 Industry, 30 Platform
Metricsnumber of active participants, turnover, contribution, sustainability, coefficient of cooperation
Risksconcentration of power, weak transparency, conflict of interest, lack of trust

18. Practical application

  • State and territorial design.
  • Architecture of organizations, cooperatives and platforms.
  • Map of knowledge and scientific and educational systems.
  • Management of programs, project portfolios and interagency relations.
  • Diagnostics of sustainability of social, production and environmental systems.
  • Digital double system in EQUILIBRIUM.

19. Criteria for scientific and applied validation

To move from conceptual language to applied theory, each term must have an operational definition, measurable metrics, and testable hypotheses.

  1. Unambiguity: One code is one specific function.
  2. Measurability: the observed indicators are specified for the node.
  3. Reproducibility: Different analysts get a comparable result.
  4. Predictability: the model improves the forecast of the system state.
  5. Utility: Map-based solutions improve the quality of management.
  6. Falsifiability: The conditions under which the connection hypothesis is considered incorrect are defined.

20. Final formula

THEORY OF FIELD → FLOW THEORY → THEORY OF Knots → CONTOUR THEORY → SOYUZ741 → EQUILIBRIUM

Nodes theory becomes the connecting module between field philosophy and system engineering. Its task is to make complexity visible, communication measurable, and development manageable.

Other published edition: Knot Theory Theory_Knots_Soyuz741_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

Field Theory Module • SOYUZ741 • EQUILIBRIUM

"A node is a place where multiplicity becomes a system."

UZEL

1. What is a node

The point of concentration of connections and flows, in which the field acquires a stable function, memory, boundary and vector of development.

Code

Centre

Channels

Streams

Memory

Function

Resilience

Vector

2. The Twelve Laws

1. Crossings

2. Tensions

3. Memory

4. Capacity

A node occurs where two or more significant flows occur.

A sustainable node holds a potential, interest, or resource difference.

Each node retains a trace of past states and decisions.

any node has a limit on the volume of flows that can be processed.

5. Crystallization

6. Resonance

7. Hierarchy

8. Interchanges

Repeated stable connections turn the node into a support system.

Similar nodes reinforce each other when agreeing on a frequency, purpose, or language.

nodes form networks, networks - contours, contours - supersystems.

Overload leads to the destruction, separation or restructuring of the node.

9. Substitutions

10. Centering

11. Evolution

12. Succession

The system aims to create a compensating node when the key function is lost.

A complex system forms one or more coordination centers.

The node develops through a change in the quality of the function, not just the scale.

After the node decays, it leaves code, memory, and connections for future reassembly.

3. Eight classes of nodes

64 Node = 8 Functional Classes × 8 Positions

I. Source

II. Meaning

III. Knowledge

IV. Communications

1 Pulse 2 Idea 3 Inspiration 4 Vision 5 Appeal 6 Design 7 Iskra 8 Home

9 Myth 10 Symbol 11 Teaching 12 Codex 13 Law 14 Manifesto 15 Doctrine 16 Mission

17 Memory 18 Archive 19 Academy 20 School 21 University 22 Study 23 Laboratory 24 Library

25 Language 26 Letter 27 Mail 28 Signal 29 Internet 30 Platform 31 Neural network 32 Metaset

V. Organization

VI. Production

VII. Harmonization

VIII. Transition

33 Family 34 Rod 35 Community 36 Cooperative 37 Institute 38 State 39 Union 40 Assembly

41 Farming 42 Craft 43 Factory 44 Factory 45 Energy 46 Logistics 47 Industry 48 Technosystem

49 Art 50 Culture 51 Music 52 Architecture 53 Medicine 54 Ecology 55 Ethics 56 Beauty

57 Crisis 58 The Awakening 59 Reform 60 Revolution 61 Breakthrough 62 Transformation 63 Rebirth 64 New cycle

4. Matrix 8×8 — map 64 Node

All eight classes and 64 base nodes on one screen

Source

Impulse

Idea

Inspiration

Vision

Appeal

Idea

Iskra

Start

Meaning

Myth

Symbol

Teaching

Codex

Law

Manifesto

Doctrine

Mission

Knowledge

Memory

Archive

Academy

School

University

Research

Laboratory

Library

Contact

Language

Letter

Mail

Signal

Internet

Platform

Neural network

Metaset

Organization

Family

Rod

Community

Cooperative

Institute

State

Union

Assembly

Production

Farming

Craft

Factory

Factory

Energy

Logistics

Industry

Technosystem

Harmonization

Art

Culture

Music

Architecture

Medicine

Ecology

Ethics

Beauty

Transition

Crisis

The Awakening

Reform

Revolution

Breakthrough

Transformation

Rebirth

New cycle

5. Node dynamics

Capacity

Sleeping

Formed

Active

Mature

Seteva

Resilient

Nuclear

Maturity is the quality of function and connectedness, not just scale.

6. Crystal SOYUZ741

• 64 741 module • single field links

Crystal is not a decorative metaphor, but a map: • nodes • dependencies • threads • states • transitions

NUCLEAR

7. Register SOYUZ741

Each module receives a single passport and a unique code.

Code

Name

Node

Type

Function

Inputs

Exits

Metrics

Connections

Validation

The goal is to turn the concept into a verifiable, measurable and manageable system.

8. Control Core EQUILIBRIUM

Observation

Diagnostics

Forecast

What's Happening

where the deviation

What will happen next

Priority

Coordination

Feedback

What is important now

Who and what does

what has changed

The kernel coordinates - nodes perform functions.

9. Diagnostics of the node network

Healthy node

Weak node

Overloaded

clear function, sufficient connections, adequate load, measurable output

blurred function, low connectivity, dependence on external impulse

too many inputs, delays, role conflicts, reduced quality solutions

Isolated

False node

Transitional

function is available, but there are no necessary interfaces with the network

high visibility with low system contribution

old function is no longer effective, new is not yet stable

10. Five management operations

Find

Describe

Measure

Connect

Reassemble

11. Example: node 36 "Cooperative"

Function

Inputs

Joint organization of resources, labour and responsibility

participants, needs, competencies, assets, projects

Exits

Key connections

products, services, employment, mutual assistance, capital cooperation

35 Community, 37 Institute, 46 Logistics, 47 Industry, 30 Platform

Metrics

Risks

number of active participants, turnover, contribution, sustainability, coefficient of cooperation

concentration of power, weak transparency, conflict of interest, lack of trust

12. The Five Axes of Crystal

Axle 1

Source → Meaning → Knowledge → Communication

Axle 2

Family → Community → Cooperative → State → Union

Axle 3

Agriculture → Craft → Industry → Technosystem

Axle 4

Art → Culture → Ethics → Beauty

Axle 5

Crisis → Reform → Breakthrough → Transformation → New Cycle

13. From Concept to Applied Theory

Unambiguity

Measurability

Reproducibility

Clear Definitions

Indicators observed

comparable results

Foreseeability

Usefulness

Falsifiability

The best forecast

The best solutions

Conditions of Refutation

14. Where to use

State and territorial design

Organizations, cooperatives and platforms

Knowledge maps and scientific and educational systems

Project portfolios and inter-agency coordination

Environmental and production systems

Digital twin and analytics EQUILIBRIUM

THEORY OF Knots

Linking module between field philosophy and system engineering

Fields → FLOW → UZEL → NETWORKING → CONTOUR → NUCLEAR → NEW CYCLE

Make complexity measurable, communication measurable, and development manageable.

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM Hypergraphs

Source Status: Primary Document

The material represents hypergraphs as a language of multidimensional connections, protocols and living processes in the EQUILIBRIUM architecture.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/gipergrafy-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Conceptual-applied document • Version 1.0 • 24 August 2026

Contents

  1. Summary and purpose of the system
  2. Hypergraph Manifesto EQUILIBRIUM
  3. Architecture of nodes
  4. Hyperribs and interaction protocols
  5. Dynamics: states, flows and evolution
  6. Interface EQUILIBRIUM
  7. System device for non-programmer
  8. Diagnostics and AI-layer
  9. Baseline scenario: cooperative education
  10. Architecture of implementation and MVP
  11. Dictionary of key terms
  12. The final formula of the system

1. Summary and purpose of the system

Hypergraphs EQUILIBRIUM are a model of complex systems in which a single interaction can simultaneously combine many entities: a person, an organization, a meaning, a resource, a norm, a technology, an event, an effect and a metric. Unlike an ordinary graph, where a connection connects two points, a hypergraph allows you to describe a complete contour of an action.

The system is not just for visualization. Its task is to help a person see cause and effect dependencies, find weaknesses, collect project outlines, model consequences and receive understandable recommendations.

What the system should respond to the user

  • What's going on?
  • Why is this happening?
  • Who and what influences the situation?
  • What resources and standards are involved?
  • What is the current trajectory?
  • Where is the weak spot?
  • What can be changed and how to measure the result?

2. Hypergraph Manifesto EQUILIBRIUM

Reality is not linear. Most significant processes arise not from one cause or from a pair of objects, but from the joint action of many factors. Therefore, EQUILIBRIUM introduces the hypergraph as the basic language of system thinking.

2.1. Each action is a multi-dimensional connection

Any decision involves subjects, meaning, resources, norms, time, consequences, and measurement. Therefore, the unit of action should store not one line, but a complete contour.

2.2. Meaning is a structural coordinate

The meaning answers the question "why" and sets the direction of the system. Without a meaningful basis, processes can be technically effective but strategically contradictory.

2.3. Ethics and norms are built into architecture

Limitations should be present within the model, not added after the fact. This allows you to see the acceptability, risks and responsibility even before the launch of the solution.

2.4. Time is an active measurement

The system stores not only the current state, but also the history, events and forecast trajectories.

2.5. Hypergraph: the infrastructure of the collective mind

A person sees a map, AI analyzes its structure, and decisions are made based on the general context, not fragmentary data.

3. Architecture of nodes

A node is an entity that has a role, state, and participation in one or more processes. Seven basic types are recommended for the working kernel.

01MeaningWhy there is action: mission, value, principle, direction.
02SubjectWho acts: person, organization, community, AI-agent.
03ResourceWhat the system works for: money, data, energy, time, infrastructure.
04NormaBy what rules: law, contract, standard, regulation, ethical principle.
05ProtocolHow the action is going: the central circuit that unites the other nodes.
06EffectWhat happened: result, consequence, change of state.
07MetricsHow to measure the result: index, coefficient, target value.

Passport of the node

  • ID is a unique identifier.
  • Type is a class of entity.
  • Title and description.
  • The state of harmony, growth, tension, crisis, transformation, is unknown.
  • Metrics - trust, load, activity, influence, sustainability, ethics.
  • Tags and affiliation to projects.
  • Communication and participation in protocols.

4. Hyperribs and interaction protocols

In the operating interface, hyperrebro is recommended to be represented as a separate node of the "Protocol" type. This makes multidimensional communication visible, explainable, and easy to store: meaning, subject, resource, and norm are all included in the protocol, and effects and metrics come out of it.

Types of Connections

intentIntentionThe meaning enters the protocol and sets its direction.
inputEntrance/participationThe entity or resource is involved in the execution.
constraintLimitationNorma's setting limits.
outputResultThe protocol creates an effect or a measurement.
feedbackFeedbackThe result returns to the contour and corrects it.
evolutionEvolutionLink states and changes over time.

Protocol life cycle

  1. Initiation of intention.
  2. Coordination of participants and roles.
  3. Connection of resources.
  4. Checking norms and restrictions.
  5. Run execution.
  6. Getting the effect.
  7. Measurement of result.
  8. Feedback and adjustment.
  9. Completing, scaling or evolving.

5. Dynamics: states, flows and evolution

Static hypergraph shows the structure. Dynamic hypergraph shows the life of the system: change in the weight of connections, movement of resources, change in the state of nodes and transition between scenarios.

Status

🟢HarmonyThe outline is agreed, there are no critical deficits.
🔵GrowthThe system extends the beneficial effect and sustainability.
🟡TensionThere is overload, deficit or inconsistency.
🔴CrisisThe key circuit is broken; correction is needed.
🟣TransformationThe structure, roles or goals are being restructured.
⚫UnknownNot enough data for a reliable conclusion.

Streams

  • Financial - funds, investments, budgets.
  • Information - data, signals, documents, knowledge.
  • Resources - materials, infrastructure, capacities.
  • Humans - participation, attention, competence, time.
  • Management - decisions, authority, responsibility.

The crisis in the model EQUILIBRIUM is considered as a desynchronization of layers: the target is not provided with a resource, the process is not fixed by the norm, the result is not measured, the node is overloaded or there is no feedback.

6. Interface EQUILIBRIUM

The interface is not an ornament on top of the data, but a means of navigation through a complex system. The user should see the whole picture and be able to go deeper into a specific protocol.

Main screen

TOP PANEL: search • level • mode • AI • settings
LEFT PANEL
Filters
Node types
Status
Connections
CENTER
INTERACTIVE HYPERGRAPH
Nodes • Protocols • Communications • Streams
RIGHT PANEL
Passport of the selected node / communication / protocol
LOWER PANEL: time • events • story • scenarios

Interface Modes

  • Review - understand the state of the system in a few seconds.
  • Diagnostics - see weaknesses, conflicts, overloads and missing elements.
  • The scenario is to change the parameters and see the likely consequences.
  • Action - create or change a protocol, communication, resource, norm, metric.

7. System device for non-programmer

Seven simple questions

1Why?Meaning
2Who?Subject
3On what?Resource
4By what rules?Norma
5How does it work?Protocol
6What happened?Effect
7How to measure?Metrics

If the user understands these seven questions, he understands the EQUILIBRIUM architecture even without the knowledge of programming. Code is just a way to make that logic work on the screen and in the database.

What is an "interactive graph"?

  • You can move nodes.
  • You can click on the object and open its passport.
  • You can create a new connection.
  • You can open the protocol and see the entire process.
  • You can enable filters and leave only the desired layer.
  • You can turn on the diagnosis and highlight the risks.
  • You can move through time and compare states.

8. Diagnostics and AI-layer

Diagnosis should not start with artificial intelligence, but with simple and verifiable rules. This makes the system explainable. AI is added on top of these rules as an analysis assistant.

Basic diagnostic questions

  • Does the report have a reason?
  • Is there a performer?
  • Is there enough resources?
  • Is there a regulatory framework?
  • Is there an expected effect?
  • Is there a result metric?
  • Is there any feedback?
  • Has the load limit been exceeded?
  • Is there a conflict of norms, resources, or goals?

Role AI

  • Explain the structure of a complex outline in human language.
  • Identify anomalies and hidden dependencies.
  • Offer missing connections and elements.
  • Compare scenarios and likely consequences.
  • To form warnings, but not to replace the responsibility of a person.

9. Baseline scenario: cooperative education

The script shows how an abstract model turns into a concrete living outline.

MeaningDevelopment of competencesWhy the program is launched.
SubjectCooperative / educational partnersWho is in charge of execution.
ResourceEducational Foundation, Data, InfrastructureWhat is the process.
NormaParticipation and Transparency RegulationsWhat boundaries and rules are in place?
ProtocolCooperative educational programmeHow it all comes together in a single process.
EffectIncreased Employment and CompetenceWhat's changed.
MetricsEmployment index, completion of studiesHow to prove the result.
FeedbackProgramme adjustmentHow the system learns after measurement.

On the interactive map, all inputs converge in the Protocol node, and the results and metrics come out of it. This allows you to immediately see what is missing in the process and where the impact point is located.

10. Implementation architecture and MVP

For the first working prototype, it is important to limit the complexity. You don't have to start with the entire civilization model at the same time. MVP has to prove the principle in one scenario.

Minimum composition MVP

  1. 7 types of nodes: meaning, subject, resource, norm, protocol, effect, metric.
  2. 6 types of connections: intention, input, constraint, result, feedback, evolution.
  3. One interactive screen.
  4. Right panel of the element passport.
  5. Filtering by type and condition.
  6. Basic diagnosis of the protocol.
  7. Count storage and history of changes.
  8. One demonstration scenario.

System Levels

1DataNodes, connections, metrics, history.
2LogicRules of protocols, conditions, diagnostics.
3CountVisual Map and Interactions.
4InterfaceFilters, inspector, modes, time.
5AIExplanation, recommendations, scenario analysis.

11. Dictionary of key terms

A hypergraph is a model where one relation can unite many entities.

Node — The essence of the system: meaning, subject, resource, norm, effect, etc.

Connection is the type of participation of one entity in another.

Protocol - Central circuit of action, combining many inputs and outputs.

Hyperrebro is a multi-dimensional relation; in the interface, it is implemented through a protocol node.

Current status: harmony, growth, tension, crisis, transformation, unknown.

Metric is a measurable measure of a result or condition.

Feedback — Returns the result information to modify subsequent actions.

Diagnostics - Checking the integrity, load, conflicts and system deficits.

Scenario - A variant of the future state when parameters are changed.

Interactive graph - A map with which the user can interact: select, move, link, filter, and analyze.

12. The final formula of the system

Hypergraphs EQUILIBRIUM turn disparate data, people, resources, and rules into a visible pattern of interactions. The main value of the system is not in the number of connections, but in the ability to show a complete outline: why it exists, who acts, what is provided, what is limited, what result creates and how this result changes the next cycle.

For the non-programmer user, this can be summed up in one thought: EQUILIBRIUM is a map of living processes that helps to see where the system works, where it loses its integrity and what exactly needs to be changed.

Other published edition: HYPERGRAPHS EQUILIBRIUM Hypergraphs_EQUILIBRIUM_readable.pptx · Web Text +

Language of multidimensional connections, protocols and living processes

NODES

LINKS

PROTOCOLS

EFFECTS

METRICS

Version for a clear explanation of the system device

1. What is a hypergraph

The ordinary graph connects the points. The hypergraph collects a whole outline of the action.

The Ordinary Count

Hypergraph EQUILIBRIUM

A → B

connection between two objects.

Suitable for simple relationships.

A single relationship simultaneously combines meaning, participant, resource, norm, process, effect, and metric.

Meaning

Subject

Resource

Norma

Effect

The main idea is to see not individual elements, but holistic processes.

2. The System Spine

Seven questions that turn an idea into a manageable process.

MEANING

Subject

RESOURCE

NORMA

Protocol

EFFECT

METRIC

Why?

Who?

On what?

By what rules?

How does it work?

What happened?

How to measure?

The system becomes alive when after the metric feedback and adjustment are turned on.

feedback

3. Custom Nodes

Each type of node answers its own question and has its own passport.

Meaning

Subject

Resource

Norma

mission, value, principle

person, organization, AI

money, data, energy

law, contract, regulation

Protocol

Effect

Metrics

Living multi-dimensional process

Result and consequences

Result Meter

Passport Node: Type • title • Status • metrics • Communications • history of changes

4. Protocol - central node

Hyperrebro is more convenient to understand as a hub, in which all parts of the process converge.

Subject

Meaning

Effect

Protocol

Live Process

Norma

Metrics

Resource

A protocol is a project, program, decision, or action that is assembled as a single outline.

5. Connections between nodes

The connection shows not just the “connection”, but the role of the element in the process.

Intention

Sign in

Meaning → protocol

subject/resource → protocol

Limitation

Withdrawal

standard → protocol

Protocol → effect

Feedback

Evolution

Effect → Protocol

State → New State

6. Protocol life cycle

How an idea goes from design to system evolution.

Initiation

Harmonization

Launch

Implementation

Evaluation

Correction

Evolution

Why the cycle is important

The system does not end with a result: it measures the effect, receives feedback, and changes the structure of the next cycle.

7. Status of the living system

Each node and protocol has a “health” that changes over time.

Harmony

Growth

Tension

everything is agreed

development and strengthening

Overload or conflict

Crisis

Transformation

Unknown

process break

deep restructuring

Lack of data

8. Interface: what a person sees

One screen combines the map, filters, details and time.

Search | Overview Diagnosis Script Action | AI

INTERACTIVE HYPERGRAPH

FILTERS

Node types

Status

Connections

Levels

PARTS

Passport of the node

Metrics

Risks

Actions

TIME ← events • stories • predictions →

9. Diagnostics

The system is not looking for “code errors”, but semantic and process breaks.

Does it make sense?

No → process aimless

Is there a subject?

→ no one to perform

Got a resource?

No → will not start

Is there a norm?

No → Risk and Chaos

Any effect?

No → No result

Got a metric?

No → Can not be evaluated

Any feedback?

No → Blind system

Diagnostics turns a hypergraph from a map into a control tool.

10. AI-layer

AI is not a substitute for a person’s decision — it enhances the ability to see connections and consequences.

Analyst

Coordinator

Ethical filter

bottlenecks and overloads

New connections and options

Permissibility of decisions

Prognostics

Architect

Future scenarios

restructuring of the structure

AI Receives data from the hypergraph → explains the situation → offers options → The man makes a decision.

11. Example: Cooperative education

One real contour, spread over the hypergraph.

Meaning

Subject

Resource

Norma

Protocol

Effect

Metrics

Development of competences

Cooperative

Education Fund

Programme regulations

Cooperative learning

Employment growth

Employment index

What the Leader Sees

Why do you need the process • who answers • than is provided • according to what rules • what is the result • as measured

12. The whole system

Five levels, from meaning to interface.

1. MEANING LEVEL

What the system should reflect

2. LOGICAL LEVEL

Nodes, communications, protocols, states

3. DATA

Passports, history, metrics, events

4. ANALYTICS AND AI

Diagnosis, prognosis, recommendations

5. INTERFACE

Map, filters, details, time

For the system owner, the main thing is to understand these levels. Code is a way of implementation, not a source of meaning.

13. Formula EQUILIBRIUM

Knots + COMMUNICATIONS + PROTOCOL + STATUS + COMMUNICATION

LIVE SYSTEM MAP

which shows where processes work, where they break down and what can be changed

SEE → UNDERSTAND → ACTING

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

Unified Science of Natural Systems

Source Status: Primary Document

The material offers a common language for describing living, climatic, geological, aquatic and human-natural processes.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/edinaya-nauka-prirodnykh-sistem

Open on the site

Author of the concept: Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov • SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

Scientific and operational contour OS EQUILIBRIUM

Status: Interdisciplinary concept for formalization, peer review and pilot monitoring and management. It integrates the existing sciences through common systems constructs without overturning their methods and disciplinary autonomy.

Annotation

Unified Science of Natural Systems is a meta-discipline project that studies nature as a network of nested, open, developing systems: from molecules, cells and organisms to biocenosis, river basin, climate, biosphere and technosphere. Its central object is not an isolated phenomenon, but the coherence of matter, energy, information, human life and activity in time and space.

Main thesis

The natural system cannot be reliably understood and preserved by individual departmental indicators. A single observed contour is required: state → Communications → Flows → Cycles → The limits of sustainability → scenarios → Action → effect → Training.

SupportContribution to Unified ScienceNew result
Systemic ecologybiocenosis, sustainability, trophic networksintegral profile of the territory
Earth Sciencesatmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, cryosphereInter-sphere causal relationships
Systems theoryboundaries, feedbacks, emergentUnified model of dynamics
Cyberneticssupervision, management, adaptationclosed loop solutions
Core Mathematics EQUILIBRIUM13×20, hypergraphs, flows, cyclesUnified Language and Addressing
AI and digital twinsdata integration and scenario modelingEarly Warning

1. Why a single science is needed

Modern natural threats are cascading in nature. Drought alters water balance, soil, crop yields, species migration, fire hazard, health, and economy; man-made emissions spread through air, water, food chains, and social systems. Disciplinary models remain necessary, but separate management creates blind spots between them.

  • fragmentation of data by departments and formats;
  • incomparability of scales, units and time series;
  • reaction to damage instead of early transition recognition;
  • the gap between research, regulatory decision and execution;
  • assessment of individual components instead of the viability of biocenosis;
  • Lack of a common evidence chain from signal to effect.

1.1. Subject

The subject of Unified Science is the laws of education, functioning, adaptation, transformation and restoration of natural and human-natural systems, expressed through universal categories of boundaries, structures, flows, cycles, coherence, diversity, sustainability, risk and inheritance.

2. Ontology of the natural system

CategoryDefinitionThe control question
Borderselected scale and exchange with environmentWhat's inside, what's outside, and what's crossing the border?
Compositionelements and functional groupsWhat is the system formed of?
StructureRelationships and Spatial ConfigurationHow are the elements related?
Streamtransport of matter, energy, information and organismsWhat is moving, where and where?
Cyclereturn process with accumulation of changesWhat happens and what changes irreversibly?
FunctionContribution of the component to the viability of the wholeWhat supports the process?
StateMeasurable profile at timeWhat's going on now?
ThresholdRegime change boundaryWhen does change become quality?
MemoryInherited structures and traces of the pastWhat determines the future reaction?
AdaptationA change that remains viableHow does the system respond to the disturbance?

The natural system: Σ = ⟨B, X, R, Φ, C, K, M, E⟩

B is the boundary; X - components and states; R - relations; Φ - flows; C - cycles; K - a lot of vitality; M is memory; E is the external environment.

3. Seven Levels of Natural Organization

LevelObjectKey dynamics
1molecule and biogeochemical elementreactions, transformations, transfer
2Cell and microorganismmetabolism, information, replication
3organismhomeostasis, behavior, life cycle
4Populationnumbers, genetics, migration
5Biocenosis and ecosystemtrophic networks, competition, symbiosis
6landscape, pool, biomeSpatial connectivity and modes
7Biosphere and Earth SystemGlobal cycles and planetary boundaries

3.1. Man and technosphere

Man is both a species, a creator of institutions, and a source of powerful transformative flow. Therefore, the technosphere is considered not as an external superstructure, but as a subsystem of the Earth system, which has material metabolism, information contours, legal limitations and responsibility to future generations.

4. Universal Laws of Natural Systems

CodeProject LawVerified investigation
L1Openness: A living system exists through exchangeinsulation changes mode and reduces reproducibility
L2Attachment: each system is included in a largerpart optimization can destroy the whole
L3Limitation: flows through containers and limitsPressure buildup leads to threshold transition
L4Feedback: Consequences change subsequent behaviorDelayed management increases fluctuations
L5Diversity: Sustainability requires functional alternativesLoss of diversity reduces adaptability
L6Cyclicity: matter returns, energy dissipatesIt is necessary to separate the cycles of matter and energy flow
L7Emergence: the properties of the whole are not reduced to the sum of the partsConnectivity becomes an independent object of measurement
L8Irreversibility: Recovery is not the same as returncompensation does not always eliminate the memory loss of the system
L9Collaborative Evolution: Components Changing Each Other's EnvironmentsForecasting requires scenarios of mutual change
L10Viability: Sustainability - Dynamic Corridorcontrol is aimed at a range, not a single point

5. Mathematical Core

Condition: x(t+1) = T(x(t), u(t), ξ(t), θ)

x is the profile of the system; u is the impact; ξ — External Disgust; θ — parameters and uncertainty. The system is viable if the trajectory remains in the allowable K set on the selected horizon.

Flow balance: ΔS = In − Out + Generation − Dissipation

Connection: H = (V, E, A), where H is the hypergraph, V nodes are objects and subjects, E hyperlinks are multicomponent relations, A are attributes and proofs. Such a device allows you to link the species, habitat, pollutant, source, norm, project and solution in one model.

Integral Viability: VΣ = min(V₁…Vₙ) · G · D

Vᵢ - the viability of critical subsystems; G - Connectivity; D is the quality of evidence. The minimum protects the model from the situation when a high average index hides the destruction of an indispensable component.

6. Matrix 13×20 Natural Systems

Thirteen fields provide the complete observation, twenty stages the complete cycle of cognition and action. 260 cells serve as a single classifier of scientific questions, indicators, sources, models and solutions.

13 Nature FieldsExample of object
1. Substancewater, carbon, nitrogen, minerals
2. Energysolar, chemical, thermal
3. Informationgenetic, signal, behavioral
4. Spacehabitat, landscape, swimming pool
5. Timedaily, seasonal, multi-year cycles
6. LifeOrganisms and functional groups
7. Diversitygenetic, species, functional
8. Connectivitytrophic and migration networks
9. Wednesdayatmosphere, water, soil, climate
10. Indignationfires, droughts, invasions, pollution
11. Manhealth, culture, economy
12. Managementlaw, institutions, projects, resources
13. Futurescenarios, risks, inheritance

6.1. Twenty stages of the scientific and management cycle

№StageWithdrawal
01Signalobserved deviation
02ObservationPrimary data
03IdentificationObject and boundaries
04ClassificationSingle Code
05Verificationconfirmed quality
06DiagnosticsCauses and Connections
07ModellingFormal Model
08Risk assessmentProbability and damage
09ScriptsAlternative trajectories
10Target corridorViability conditions
11DesignImpact options
12HarmonizationBalance of interests
13DecisionMandate and responsibility
14Resourcespeople, means, rights
15ImplementationReal Action
16Monitoringstate dynamics
17MonitoringCompliance with regulations
18Effect evaluationdirect and side effects
19CorrectionAdaptation of model and measures
20InheritanceKnowledge for a new cycle

7. Biocenosis as a basic unit of observation

The biocenous monitoring point is the digital sense organ of the territory. It is not limited to air or water quality, but observes mutual changes in the atmosphere, hydrosphere, soil, plants, animals, microorganisms, man and man-made load.

  1. what is happening in the system now;
  2. whether the change is natural, adaptive or dangerous;
  3. where the source is located and through which streams the impact is spread;
  4. which functional groups and ecosystem services are affected;
  5. what action minimizes damage and retains the ability to recover.
LayerExamples of observations
Atmospheretemperature, humidity, aerosols, gases, transport
Waterlevel, flow rate, chemistry, microbiology, hydrobionts
Soilmoisture, organic matter, pollutants, microbiome
Plantsphenology, productivity, stress, species composition
Animalsnumber, movement, behavior, mortality
Personexposure, health, activity, local knowledge

8. Data and Evidence Architecture

LevelFunctionArtifact
Observationsatellites, UAVs, sensors, laboratories, civil scienceEvents and Measurements
Semanticsontologies, reference books, units, scalesSingle Dictionary
Qualitycalibration, origin, omissions, versionData Passport
IntegrationSpatial-temporal compatibilityTerritory Hypergraph
Modelbalances, networks, dynamics, causalityDigital Double
Scriptsprediction and verification of optionsTrajectory Map
Decisionmandate, responsible, indicatorsJournal of Decisions
Feedbackeffect, audit, adjustmentUpdated model

Each conclusion preserves a chain π = ⟨source, time, place, method, transformations, model, confidence, expert, version⟩. Without this chain, an analytical statement cannot become the basis for a binding decision.

9. Unified Earth Observation System

Unified Science becomes practically significant through a distributed surveillance system in which aerospace, terrestrial, laboratory, and community sources operate as a coherent sensor network. GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM" performs the planetary circuit of early warning, and biocenose points provide local depth and verification.

ScaleSourceRole
Planetarysatellites, climate and ocean networksGlobal anomalies and transfers
Regionalaero-surveillance, hydro-posts, forest and agricultural networksthreat cascades and inter-territorial links
Localbiocenosis points, laboratories, enterprisesCauses, effects and effects of measures
Humanmedicine, observation of residents, traditional knowledgeexposure, perception and early weak signals

10. Institutional architecture

ContourRole
EQUILIBRIUMobservation, NEUROSVOD, models, forecast, control of evidence
SFERAspace of initiatives, scientific communities and public participation
ECO-PPAtransforming risks into agreements, portfolios of measures and financing
SPECZASHCHITAcooperation of performers, technologies and production resources
IACSituational analysis, decision preparation and enforcement
Validation Centerindependent verification of data, models, experts and effect

Separation principle: One subject should not simultaneously possess critical data, set weights, make a decision, execute it, and confirm the result.

11. Scientific directions and institutes

Area of workTask
Systems Biology and EcologyMechanisms of organization and viability of living systems
Biogeochemistry of flowscycles of matter and connection with the energy system
Science of Biocenosesfunctional networks and ecosystem services
Geosystem DynamicsConnection of atmosphere, water, soil and relief
Science of Natural CyclesMultifrequency rhythms and regime change
Applied Flow TheoryBalances of natural and technogenic metabolisms
Ecology of informationsignals, memory, learning and management
The mathematics of viabilitythresholds, sustainability, adaptation and recovery
Ethics of natural systemsrights, responsibility and intergenerational balance
Recovery EngineeringRegenerative Intervention Design

12. Educational model

Unified Science requires specialists of a new type - integrators who are able to understand the boundaries of disciplines, link data of different scales and translate the model into a testable action. Preparation is based on the principle "object - system - proof - solution".

  • basic language of Earth systems and sciences;
  • mathematical modeling, statistics and causal analysis;
  • field observation and laboratory verification;
  • Geographic information systems, remote sensing and AI;
  • law, ethics, economics and public participation;
  • project practice in real territory.

12.1. Levels of qualification

LevelCompetence
Observercorrectly collects and documents data
AnalystConnecting sources and identifying connections
ModelistBuilding and testing dynamic models
Architectdesign the contour of data, solutions and feedback
Validatorindependently verify methods, evidence and effect

13. Pilot program

Stage0–6 months6–18 months18–36 months
ScienceGlossary and OntologyFlow and Viability ModelsOpen Standard
DataPassport of sourcesHypergraph Pilot AreaInterregional Data Federation
Infrastructure1 biocenosis pointnetwork of points + aerospaceScalable GASMP
ManagementRegulation of SignalsClosed Solution CycleValidation and Training Center
Resultbase lineMeasured Prevented Damagereproducibility and portability

13.1. The first pilot

It is recommended that the basin area, where natural, industrial, agricultural and social processes are simultaneously observed. The pool naturally combines the flow of water, substances, biota, land use and administrative decisions, so it allows you to test the interdisciplinary model on real connectivity.

14. Verification and limits of applicability

  1. Compare new models with disciplinary basic methods;
  2. Retrotesting on historical events;
  3. Publish uncertainty, weight and sensitivity of conclusions;
  4. provide independent reproduction and audit;
  5. not to allow automatic restriction of rights on the integral index;
  6. Consider symbolic constructs as hypotheses before empirical testing.

Criterion of scientific maturity

Unified Science will take place not when the widest vocabulary is created, but when its general constructions will allow to more accurately explain causal connections, to recognize transitions earlier, to reproduce compare scenarios and improve real solutions without losing disciplinary rigor.

Conclusion

The Unified Science of Natural Systems turns scattered observations of the Earth into a common language of viability. It connects the depth of specialized sciences with the architecture of the whole: it shows how matter, energy, information, life, territory, man and management form a single dynamic system.

Formula of doctrine

KNOWLEDGE OF NATURE = OBSERVATION × RELATIONSHIP × CYCLES × PROOF × RESPONSIBLE ACTION

Its practical expression becomes EQUILIBRIUM — NEUROSVOD and an operating system that observes natural processes, links scales, simulates risks, supports decisions, and returns the measured effect to a new knowledge cycle.

Next package

  • Volume I. Dictionary and axiomatics of natural systems.
  • Volume II. Atlas 13×20 and 260 Scientific and Operational Cells.
  • Vol. III. Biocenous monitoring point standard.
  • Volume IV. Hypergraph and digital twin territory protocol.
  • Volume V. State and international program of Unified Science.

? 2026 Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov / SOKOL EQUILIBRIS. Conceptual revision of the project EQUILIBRIUM.

Other published edition: UNIQUE SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS Edinaya_Nauka_Prirodnyh_Sistem.pptx · web text +

Common language of living, climatic, geological, water and human-natural processes

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 2026

Nature is a system of connections, not a set of industries

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

Modern threats spread across disciplines

The Blind Zone

Drought changes water, soil, biota, fires, health and economy

Occurred

between

Departments,

Scales

and cycles

Pollution is transported through air, water and food webs

Separate data gives a delayed and incomplete picture

A single observed circuit is needed

Science studies the viability of the whole.

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

OBJECT

Language:

RESULT

Embedded natural and human-natural systems

Borders • flows • cycles • connectivity • thresholds

Testable knowledge turned into responsible action

State → Communications → Scenarios → Action → Effect → Training

Seven levels form one Earth system.

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

Molecule

Organism

Biocenosis

Biosphere

Cage

Population

Landscape

The technosphere is included in the system as a powerful transformative metabolism

Ten Laws Set a Common Framework for Research

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

Openness

Attachment

Limitations

Feedback

Diversity

Cyclicity

Emergence

Irreversibility

Co-evolution

Viability

Σ = ⟨ B, X, R, Φ, C, K, M, E ⟩

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

One formula links boundary, flows, cycles and memory

Border

Status

Relationships

Flows

Cycles

Viability

Memory

Wednesday

The mathematical core works with trajectories, not pictures.

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

State Transition

Flow balance

x(t+1) = T(x(t), u(t), ξ(t), θ)

ΔS = In − Out + Generation − Dissipation

Hypergraph Connections

Viability

H = (V, E, A)

VΣ = min(V₁…Vₙ) · G · D

Matrix 13×20 Turns integrity into an addressable system

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

Nature Fields

Stages of the full cycle

Substance • energy • information • Space • Time • Life • Diversity • Connectivity • Wednesday • Perturbations • person • Management • Future

260 Research and Operations Cells

A complete cycle leads from a weak signal to inherited knowledge

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

SIGNAL

VERIFICATION

SCENARIA

DECISION

MONITORING

HERITAGE

Each stage has data, method, responsible and proof

Biocenosis point - the digital sense organ of territory

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

Atmosphere

Water

Soil

Plants

Animals

Microorganisms

Person

Technogenic load

Observe not the parameters individually, but the response of the biocenosis as a whole

Architecture connects sensors, models, solutions and effect

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

Observation

Semantics

Quality

Hypergraph

Model

Scripts

Decision

Feedback

π = Source • Time • Place • Method • Model • confidence • Version

GASMP connects planetary observation with local verification

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

PLANET

satellites • climate • ocean

anomalies and transfers

REGION

aerial survey • hydroposts • forests

Cascades of threats

TERRITORY

Biocenous Points • Laboratory

Causes and effect

HUMANITY

Health • Observations • Knowledge

Exposure and weak signals

Science becomes action through ecosystem EQUILIBRIUM

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

watches • models • forecasts

unites knowledge • people • initiatives

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

Turns risks into agreements and resources

executable • produces • scales

IAC coordinates decisions • Validation Center confirms evidence

Ten areas form a new scientific school

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

Systemic Biology

Biogeochemistry of flows

Science of Biocenoses

Geosystem Dynamics

Science of Natural Cycles

Applied Flow Theory

Ecology of information

The mathematics of viability

Ethics of natural systems

Recovery Engineering

In 36 months, the concept is on its way to an open standard

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

0–6 MES.

6–18 MES.

18–36 MES.

Glossary • ontology • data passport • first point

Territory hypergraph • models • surveillance network • solution cycle

Interregional Federation • validation center • standard • training

To know nature is to see the whole

UNIFORM SCIENCE OF NATURAL SYSTEMS

OBSERVATION × RELATIONSHIP × CYCLES × PROOF × RESPONSIBLE ACTION

Next step: pilot basin area and biocenosis point standard

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • EQUILIBRIUM • 2026

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

The Science of Cycles in EQUILIBRIUM

Source Status: Primary Document

The material reveals the author's theory of rhythms, phases, transitions and controlled evolution of systems.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/nauka-tsiklov-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM · scientific and methodological document

The cycle is not a repetition of the past, but a form of organizing change over time.

1. Subject Science Cycles

Cyclic science is an interdisciplinary theory that studies the regularities of repeatability, phase, rhythmicity, resonance, bifurcation, transitions, and spiral development of natural, biological, social, economic, technological, and civilizational systems.

Its object is not the “circular return” of events, but the structure of state change in time, where each system has a characteristic period, amplitude, phase, internal memory, limitations of stability and the possibility of moving to a new level of organization.

X(t) = F(P(t), E(t), C(t), R(t), M(t))

where X(t) is the state of the system; P(t) is the phase E(t) is available energy; C(t) is the context of the environment. R(t) - resources; M(t) is the accumulated memory and structural experience of previous cycles.

2. Scientific grounds

The science of Cycles relies on existing scientific directions, but combines them into a general system of analysis: the theory of dynamic systems, nonlinear dynamics, the theory of oscillations and waves, chronobiology, control theory, thermodynamics of open systems, synergetics, catastrophe theory, system analysis, economic cyclicity and the theory of adaptive systems.

It is crucial to separate the two levels: the first is empirically confirmed cyclic and quasi-periodic processes; the second is hypotheses about cycles that require statistical verification and should not be accepted as a law just because the sequence seems repetitive.

3. Axioms

  • A1. Every observable system has a state that changes over time.
  • A2. Many stable systems exhibit periodic, quasi-periodic, or repetitive phase modes.
  • A3. The real cycle is rarely a perfect sinusoid: its parameters can drift, and its shape can change.
  • A4. Cycle phases differ not only in time, but also in a set of acceptable management strategies.
  • A5. A crisis is not a necessary element of any cycle, but often occurs when the limits of sustainability are exceeded.
  • A6. Feedback is able to change the amplitude, period, phase and even the topology of the cycle.
  • A7. The learning system can turn repetition into spiral development, preserving the memory of previous turns.

4. Basic Mathematics of the Cyclic Process

x(t) = A sin(ωt + φ) + C

This is the simplest model of the harmonic cycle, where A is the amplitude, ω is the angular frequency, φ is the phase shift, and C is the average state.

ω = 2π / T

The T period specifies the duration of one full turn, but in living and social systems the variable T(t) period is more often used, as the speed of processes changes.

x(t) = Σ Aᵢ sin(ωᵢt + φᵢ) + ε(t)

The superposition of several frequencies allows describing complex systems in which the observed state is the result of overlapping multiple cycles, and ε(t) reflects noise and unaccounted factors.

5. 12 Extended Cycle Phases

CodePhaseContents
01CapacityAccumulation of prerequisites without manifested form.
02ImpulsePrimary occurrence of directed change.
03ActivationTransition from opportunity to sustainable process.
04GrowthExpanding, increasing connections and resources.
05AccelerationIncreased speed of change and sensitivity of the system.
06PeakMaximum implementation area of the current configuration.
07SaturationDecreased marginal return and accumulation of inertia.
08OverextensionIncreased internal costs and vulnerabilities.
09CrisisViolation of the stability of the previous configuration.
10TransformationRedistribution of connections and allocation of a viable core.
11StabilisationConsolidation of a new configuration.
12RestartStart of the next cycle with changed parameters.

6. Cycle parameters

ParameterInterpretation
Period TTime of complete cycle.
Amplitude AThe scale of deviation from the average level.
Phase φThe position of the system within the current cycle.
Frequency fNumber of cycles per unit time.
Coherence KThe degree of consistency of several rhythms.
Entropy HA measure of the uncertainty or misalignment of a structure.
Memory MAccumulated influence of previous states.
Sustainability SThe ability to maintain function during disturbances.
Adaptability AdAbility to change parameters without loss of integrity.

7. Resonance and synchronization

When the frequencies of the two interacting systems become close, a resonance mode is possible in which even a relatively small impact can significantly increase the response amplitude; in this case, resonance is not always useful, since it can both enhance productive coordination and accelerate destruction.

Δω = |ω₁ - ω₂|

Sync ≈ 1 / (1 + Δω)

For practical diagnostics, not only the proximity of frequencies is required, but also phase compatibility, sufficient stability margin and the presence of amplitude limiters.

8. Phase transitions and bifurcations

Bifurcation is the area of parameters in which a small change in the control factor is able to transfer the system to a qualitatively different trajectory; such points are especially important for forecasting, since near them linear extrapolation of the past becomes unreliable.

xₙ₊₁ = r xₙ (1 - xₙ)

Logistic mapping shows how the same simple system, when changing the parameter r, can consistently undergo a steady mode, periodic oscillations and chaotic dynamics.

9. Open Systems Cycles

Living, social and economic systems are not closed: they exchange energy, matter, information and capital with the environment, so their cycles can not be explained only by internal causes.

dX/dt = F(X, U, ξ, t)

Here, U is the control action, ξ is the external perturbation; the task of Cycle Science is to separate the endogenous and exogenous sources of oscillation.

10. Human Cycles

For humans, scientifically confirmed examples of cyclicity are circadian rhythms, ultra-dianic rhythms, sleep-wakefulness, hormonal fluctuations, and a number of physiological cycles; broader psychological or life "cycles" should be considered as models and verified by data, rather than accepted as universal constants.

In the application system EQUILIBRIUM, the individual cycle can be described through energy, attention, load, recovery, quality of solutions, and external context.

11. Social and civilizational cycles

Societies exhibit repetitive modes of mobilization, institutionalization, stabilization, overloading, and reform, but historical events are not repeated mechanically; therefore, the correct model must take into account technological change, demographics, institutional memory, the international environment, and unique random events.

Society(t) = F(Institutions, Demography, Technology, Resources, Trust, ExternalField)

Hence, Cycle Science should not become a historical determinism: its task is to reveal the structures of probability and the windows of transition, and not to declare the future inevitable.

12. Economic and technological cycles

In economics, cyclical processes are observed in investment, credit, inventory, manufacturing, innovation waves, and business activity; with specific periodicity varying depending on institutions, policies, technology, and external shocks.

Technology systems are also undergoing phases of research, prototyping, early implementation, scaling, saturation, substitution and transition to a new platform.

TechnologyCycle = R&D → Prototype → Adoption → Scale → Saturation → Replacement

13. The Development Spiral

If the system stores information about the previous cycle and uses it to change its own structure, the next turn is no longer a repetition of the first; a spiral arises in which similar functions return, but the scale, accuracy, stability and level of organization change.

Lₙ₊₁ = Lₙ + ΔKnowledge + ΔStructure - ΔLoss

The criterion of real development is a positive increase in the ability of the system to distinguish the state, predict the consequences and choose an adequate phase of action.

14. Hypergraph Science Cycles

To describe multidimensional states, a hypergraph model is proposed, where one object simultaneously belongs to several dimensions: phase, energy level, context, resource, risk, action, and spiral level.

N = (P, E, C, R, D, L)

H = (V, ℰ)

Unlike an ordinary graph, a hyperrebro can connect many conditions and outcomes at once, which allows modeling real management situations where the solution does not depend on one parameter.

15. Operating system cycles

The practical application of Cycle Science is implemented through an operating system that receives data, determines the current phase, measures the resource and context, assesses transition risks, suggests acceptable strategies, and tracks the result through feedback.

  • Observation: collection of time series and events.
  • Normalization: data cleaning and synchronization.
  • Phase diagnostics: determining the current mode.
  • Scenario calculation: construction of probable trajectories.
  • Choice of action: comparison of action with phase and resource.
  • Control of transition: observation of the actual result.
  • Training: updating model parameters.

Decision* = argmaxₐ E[Utility | State, Action=a]

16. Phase Readiness Index

For application management, a standardized phase readiness index FRI, combining energy, resource, environmental consistency and stability, can be used, and the weights must be calibrated for the data of a specific subject area.

FRI = w₁E + w₂R + w₃K + w₄S - w₅H

The index value is not a universal physical constant; it is an engineering metric that only becomes significant after validation on historical and current data.

17. Forecasting cycles

The prediction is not built through the mechanical continuation of one wave, but through an ensemble of methods: spectral analysis, autocorrelation, wavelet analysis, state models, machine learning, expert scenarios and structural gap analysis.

Forecast = Ensemble(Spectral, StateSpace, ML, Scenario, Expert)

The quality of the forecast should be evaluated by retrospective testing, confidence intervals and comparison with naive base models.

18. Criteria of scientificity

  • Defined and measurable variables.
  • Hypotheses that allow rebuttal.
  • A clear distinction between correlation and causation.
  • Repeated methods of analysis.
  • Open description of data sources and assumptions.
  • Checks the stability of the results to the choice of period and parameters.
  • Separation of symbolic models from empirically confirmed laws.

19. Errors of Cyclic Thinking

The main danger of Cycle Science is to see patterns where there is a random coincidence; human perception recognizes patterns well and is therefore inclined to overestimate regularity.

  • Adjustment of the period after observation of the result.
  • Choose only convenient historical examples.
  • Ignoring structural changes.
  • Transfer of physical cycles to society without evidence.
  • Declaring any recurrence a causal law.
  • Use symbols instead of data.

20. Registers Science Cycles

To accumulate the evidence base, it is proposed to create a family of registers EQUILIBRIUM, in which each declared cyclical pattern receives a passport, data source, method of identification, observation period, statistical significance, restrictions and verification status.

CodeRegister
RCY-01Register of natural cycles
RCY-02Register of biological rhythms
RCY-03Register of climatic and geophysical cycles
RCY-04Register of Social Dynamics
RCY-05Register of Economic Cycles
RCY-06Register of technological cycles
RCY-07Register of Historical and Civilizational Models
RCY-08The register of phase transitions and bifurcations
RCY-09Register of forecasting methods
RCY-10Register of refuted and unconfirmed cyclic hypotheses

21. Passport of cyclic regularity

  • ID and model name
  • Object of observation
  • Time scale
  • Data source
  • Estimated period and range of drift
  • Detection method
  • Amplitude and stability
  • External factors
  • Statistical confidence
  • Predictive ability
  • Known Exceptions
  • Status: Hypothesis/observation/confirmed/refuted

22. Place in architecture EQUILIBRIUM

In architecture EQUILIBRIUM, Cycle Science becomes a temporal layer over registers, hypergraphs, and monitoring systems: it answers not only the question "what exists", but also the questions "what phase it is in", "what change is most likely", "what transitions are dangerous" and "what moment is most suitable for action".

Reality Model = Objects × Relations × Time × Cycles × Decisions

Thus, EQUILIBRIUM may not consider an object as a static record, but as a process with a history, rhythm, phase, and set of possible trajectories.

23. Research programme

  • Create a single thesaurus of Cycle Science terms.
  • Create a register of confirmed and controversial cyclic models.
  • Develop a method of spectral and phase diagnostics.
  • Create reference data sets for testing models.
  • Develop a phase classifier EQUILIBRIUM.
  • Create a transition hypergraph and a script library.
  • Establish a system of levels of evidence.
  • Conduct pilots on natural, economic and technological data.
  • Develop a visual operating system of cycles and API for machine analysis.
  • Create an annual Atlas of Cycles.

24. Final formula

CycleScience = Observation + Mathematics + Validation + Prediction + Control + Learning

Cycle Science in its mature form is a discipline about the temporal architecture of systems that combines observation, mathematics, experiment, prediction, and control, maintaining a strict boundary between a proven pattern, an engineering model, and symbolic interpretation.

The main practical task is not to search for "magical periods", but to create a tool that can distinguish modes of change, recognize transitions in advance, assess uncertainty and choose actions that correspond to the real state of the system.

Other published edition: CYCLE SCIENCE Nauka_Ciklov_EQVILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

Fundamental theory of rhythms, phases, transitions and controlled evolution of systems

Capacity

Restart

Impulse

Stabilisation

Activation

Transformation

Growth

CYCLE

X(t) = F(P, E, C, R, M)

EQUILIBRIUM

Crisis

Acceleration

Overextension

Peak

Saturation

1. What Science Cycles Learn

Not a “repetition of events” but a temporary architecture of system change

Object

Subject

Practice

Conditions, rhythms, periods, amplitudes, phase shifts, memory, and stability of systems.

Patterns of emergence, growth, saturation, transition, crisis, and renewal.

Phase diagnosis, transition prediction, choice of timely action and system training.

CycleScience = Observation + Mathematics + Validation + Prediction + Control + Learning

A cycle is a form of organizing change over time.

2. Scientific grounds

Interdisciplinary bridge between dynamics, biology, management and systems analysis

Dynamical systems

Fluctuations and Waves

Chronobiology

trajectory, stability, attractors

frequency, phase, resonance

circadian and ultra-dian rhythms

Management theory

Synergetics

Economic dynamics

feedback and correction

Self-organization and transitions

Business, investment and innovation cycles

Separation: confirmed cycles ↔ engineering models ↔ hypotheses

3. The Seven Axis

A framework of theory that can be verified with data

System status changes over time

Many systems have repetitive modes.

The real cycle is rarely perfect.

Phases require different strategies

The crisis is often linked to sustainability

The feedback changes the cycle itself

Memory turns a circle into a spiral

4. Mathematics of the Cyclic Process

From harmonic rhythm to superposition of multiple frequencies

x(t) = A sin(ωt + φ) + C

A is amplitude

ω - angular frequency

φ - phase shift

C is the average

T is the period of one full turn

In real systems, T can drift: T = T(t)

x(t) = Σ Aᵢ sin(ωᵢt + φᵢ) + ε(t)

Observed state = overlay cycles + noise + external disturbances

5. Extended Cycle: 12 Phases

Capacity

From Potential Opportunity to a New Age

Restart

Impulse

Temporary Logic

Not every system goes through a crisis necessarily - the transition can be mild if the correction occurs before the loss of stability.

Birth → Deployment → Max → Limit → Transition → New Configuration

Stabilisation

Activation

Transformation

Growth

CYCLE

Crisis

Acceleration

Overextension

Peak

Saturation

6. Nine cycle parameters

What is measured and becomes the input for diagnosis

Period

Amplitude

Phase

Frequency

Coherence

Entropy

Memory

Resilience

Adaptability

7. Resonance and synchronization

The coincidence of rhythms can enhance both development and destruction.

Sync ≈ 1 / (1 + Δω)

Resonance is useful only when the phases are compatible and there is a margin of stability.

8. Bifurcations: points of change of trajectory

A small change in the parameter can translate the system into a qualitatively different mode

xₙ₊₁ = r xₙ (1 - xₙ)

Bifurcation

Several possible regimes

Sustainability

9. Open Systems Cycles

The internal rhythm always interacts with the environment

dX/dt = F(X, U, ξ, t)

Person

Society

Economy

Technology

sleep, load, recovery

institutions, trust, demography

credit, investment, production

R&D, implementation, saturation, replacement

U - control · ξ - external disturbances

10. The Development Spiral

Memory turns repetition into evolution

Lₙ₊₁ = Lₙ + ΔKnowledge + ΔStructure - ΔLoss

Development criterion: the system better distinguishes the state, predicts the consequences and chooses the action.

The circle repeats.

Spiral accumulates experience.

11. Hypergraph Science Cycles

The state simultaneously belongs to several dimensions

N = (P, E, C, R, D, L)

Context

Energy

Resource

STATE

Phase

Action

Level

12. Operating system cycles

From observation to diagnosed condition and solution

Observation

Normalization

Phase diagnosis

Scenario calculation

Choice of action

Transition control

Training

Decision* = argmaxₐ E[Utility | State, Action=a]

13. Phase Readiness Index and Forecast

Engineering metrics require calibration and retrospective verification

FRI = w₁E + w₂R + w₃K + w₄S - w₅H

Forecast = Ensemble(Spectral, StateSpace, ML, Scenario, Expert)

FRI

The Forecast Ensemble

A standardized index for a specific subject area. Not a universal physical constant.

Spectral Analysis, State Models, Machine Learning, Scenarios, and Expert Evaluation.

Quality criterion: backtesting + confidence intervals + comparison with naive model

14. Science versus the illusion of regularity

A theory must be able to disprove itself.

Criteria of scientificity

Errors of Cyclic Thinking

• Measurable variables

• Falsifiable hypotheses

• Repeated methods

• Open Data and Assumptions

• Validation of stability of result

• Post factum period fit

• Selection of convenient examples

• Ignoring structural shifts

• Transfer of analogies without evidence

• Symbols instead of data

15. Registers Science Cycles

Each pattern receives a passport, source, method and verification status

RCY-01 Natural

RCY-02 Biological

RCY-03 Climate/geophysics

RCY-04 Social

RCY-05 Economic

RCY-06

RCY-07

RCY-08 Bifurcation

RCY-09 Forecasting methods

RCY-10 Refuted hypotheses

16. The Science of Cycles in Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

Time layer over objects, registers, hypergraphs and solutions

Reality Model = Objects × Relations × Time × Cycles × Decisions

OBJECTS

LINKS

TIME

CYCLES

DECISIONS

What exists

How related

How it changes

In what phase

What to do

Next step: Atlas Cycles + phase classifier + script library + API

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

Applied Flow Theory

Source Status: Primary Document

Universal model of observation, analysis and control of dynamic systems

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/prikladnaya-teoriya-potokov

Open on the site

Streams → Contacts → Balance → Forecast → Decision → Action → Result

Concept paper • Version 1.0 • 22 August 2026

Summary

Applied flow theory considers complex systems not as a set of static objects, but as dynamic configurations of interrelated material, energy, information, financial, social, biological, managerial, technological and event flows.

The system exists, evolves and transforms through the movement, transformation and harmonization of flows.

Within the framework of EQUILIBRIUM, this logic is used as a universal language for describing, monitoring, forecasting and managing systems of various scales - from a technological installation and an enterprise to a city, a state and an ecosystem.

1. From the theory of random flows to the universal model

The classical theory of random flows explores the sequences of events that occur over time, their intensity, statistical dependencies, and modes. In the extended model EQUILIBRIUM, the concept of flow is transferred to any directional changes in the system state.

2. Basic flow model

Source → intensity → direction → Channel → Node → conversion → recipient → Result → feedback

For each stream, the source, intensity, direction, transmission channels, conversion nodes, constraints, losses, recipients, and the result generated are recorded.

3. Event and intensity

The minimum unit of the model is an event: a transaction, decision, action, transfer of information, change of indicator, production, consumption or transition of an object to a new state. The set of events creates a flow.

Intensity of flow is indicated λ. In a complex system, it can be considered as a function of the state: λ = f(M, E, S, I, R, C) where M is meaning and purpose; E - energy and resource; S is the structure; I - information; R: Limitations and risks. C - Communications.

This dependence is a conceptual, not a completed physical law. For scientific verification, it is necessary to determine measurable variables, units, functional form and scope of applicability.

4. Current state and dynamic balance

The state of the system is determined by incoming flows, internal transformations, outgoing flows, accumulations and losses. Sustainability does not mean immobility: open systems maintain stability through continuous exchange.

Dynamic EQUILIBRIUM is a state of flux coherence in which the system maintains viability and adaptability.

5. The Seven Laws of Flow Conception

1. Stream priority

A stable structure is maintained by the flow of matter, energy, information, or other resources.

2. Law of Intensity

The impact of flow is determined by the volume, intensity, distribution in time and space, and structure of interactions.

3. The law of balance

Sustainability is concerned with the ratio of incoming, generated, transformed, accumulated and outgoing flows.

4. The Law of Memory

The history of the system can influence the subsequent dynamics, creating correlations, inertia, and dependence on the trajectory.

5. The Law of Critical Transition

When the threshold conditions are reached, quantitative changes in parameters can cause a qualitative restructuring of the system mode.

6. The Law of Management

Exposure to rules, channels, restrictions, and feedback can be more effective than exposure to individual events.

7. The Law of Self-Organization

Systems with feedback are able to rebuild internal connections and form new stable modes.

6. Flow typology

ClassExamples
Materialraw materials, products, transport, water, food, equipment
Energyelectricity, heat, fuel, energy storage and transmission
Financialmoney, investments, payments, taxes, loans, calculations
Informationdata, knowledge, documents, signals, communications
Socialpeople, competences, migration, cooperation, work
Managerialdecisions, orders, regulations, control
Environmentalwater, carbon, biomass, substances, waste, biogeochemical cycles
EventsChanges within the system

7. Streaming architecture and nodes

Sources → Channels → Nodes → Converters → Drives → consumers → feedback

A node is an element of a system in which flows are connected, separated, transformed, accumulated, restricted, or redirected.

8. Losses and efficiency

Real systems have lost energy, time, information, resources, money, and managerial attention. For application tasks, a flow utility factor can be introduced — the proportion of the source stream converted into the target result.

9. Feedback and management

Measurement → analysis → solution → impact → new measurement

Basic flow control operations: amplification, attenuation, redirection, separation, unification, and transformation.

10. Digital Double Streams

The digital twin EQUILIBRIUM should display current intensity, direction, node load, deficits, excesses, constraints, critical points, forecast, and redistribution options.

11. Current Balance Index EQUILIBRIUM

IPB-EQ is a projected analytical measure of the consistency of resources, needs, production capacity, information, finance, infrastructure, and human capital. Prior to practical use, formal technique, rationing, weights, data sources, sensitivity testing, and independent validation are required.

12. Flow economy

Resource → financing → Production → Logistics → Market → consumption → Return of capital → Reinvestment

The object of analysis becomes a complete chain of creation of the result. Breaking or overloading one area can change the entire chain.

13. Flow model of the state

The state can be modeled as a network of flows of population, finance, energy, goods, data, decisions, knowledge, and natural resources. Management is concerned with the ability to observe, predict, coordinate and reserve these flows.

14. Flow model of biocenosis

Solar energy → Producers → Consumes → Reducents → soil and environment → new cycle

Environmental monitoring should take into account the relationship of water, carbon, nitrogen, energy and biological exchange, since a change in one stream can cascade to change the biocenosis.

15. Artificial Intelligence

AI performs an analytical function: anomaly detection, prediction, bottleneck search, scenario modeling and resource allocation optimization. Solutions with high error costs require data verifiability and human control.

16. Hypergraph Streams

A hypergraph can describe situations where a single stream or event simultaneously depends on multiple organizations, territories, technologies, and regulatory conditions.

17. Universal control cycle

Monitoring → Measurement → Modeling → forecast → solution → Stream redirection → control of the result → training system

The cycle is applicable at micro, meso, macro and global levels.

18. Platform EQUILIBRIUM

DATA → FLOWS → COMMUNICATIONS → BALANCE → FORECAST → DECISION → ACTION → RESULTS

Applied flow theory can serve as the conceptual core of platform EQUILIBRIUM, combining monitoring, system analysis, scenario modeling, and control.

19. Scientific program of formalization

  • Define a strict dictionary: event, flow, node, state, intensity, balance, criticality, memory.
  • Separate physical, informational, economic and social quantities and do not mix their dimensions.
  • For each class of systems, specify measurable variables and state equations.
  • To form models of observation and estimation of parameters on data.
  • Check the models on retrospective data and pilot objects.
  • Compare predictive ability with existing models.
  • Publish the criteria for falsifiability and applicability limits.
  • After validation, form industry standards and digital modules.

20. Final formula

EQUILIBRIUM = Monitoring of flows + Modeling of interrelations + Forecasting changes + Dynamic balance management

The main application idea is the transition from managing individual consequences to understanding the architecture of the processes that these consequences create. The flow approach becomes scientifically useful when its concepts are translated into measurable quantities and testable models.

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

UNIVERSAL LAW OF SYSTEMS

Source Status: Primary Document

A conceptual collection of principles of integrity, sustainability and development

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/universalnyi-zakon-sistem-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Communication creates a system. The measure keeps. The feedback evolves. It makes sense.

Version 1.0 • 2026

1. Status and purpose of the document

This document formulates the Universal Law of Systems as a generalized principle of description, analysis, design and development of complex systems. It is intended for use within the framework of EQUILIBRIUM and Unified Technology (EUT), as well as a methodological framework for interdisciplinary management models.

The wording of the document is conceptual and methodological. Where physical, biological or mathematical terms are used, they do not substitute for established scientific laws and require independent empirical verification when applied to specific objects.

2. The Universal Law of Systems

Any system exists, maintains stability and develops to the extent that its elements, connections, flows, goals and interaction with the environment are in a dynamically coordinated state. Increased coherence increases vitality and development capacity; loss of coherence leads to degradation, decay, or transition to a new state.

In short, the law can be expressed as follows: "The measure of the life of the system is a measure of the reconciliation of differences." The system does not eliminate the differences between the elements, but organizes them so that they form a stable whole and maintain a common function.

3. Basic system ontology

For the purpose of the AAU, any system under investigation is presented through seven interrelated components:

  • Elements are the objects, agents, modules, or states that make up a system.
  • Connections are stable relationships and channels of interaction between elements.
  • Flows are the movement of matter, energy, information, finance, resources, attention, or other media.
  • Structure is the configuration of elements, links, and levels of a system.
  • A function or meaning is the purpose of a system and the criterion by which its outcome is evaluated.
  • Feedback is a mechanism for obtaining information about the consequences of action and subsequent correction.
  • Environment and time - external conditions, constraints, cycles and dynamics of changes.

4. The Seven Principles of Universal Law

4.1. Principle of Integrity

The whole is determined not only by the composition, but also by the relations between the parts. Removing or changing a key connection can change the properties of the entire system, even if the set of elements remains the same.

4.2. Principle of Connectivity

The viability of the system depends on the quality, adequacy and sustainability of the connections. Excessive centralization, communication gaps, and lack of back-up connections increase fragility.

4.3. The principle of flows

The system supports itself through exchange. To manage, you need to see the sources, channels, capacity, delays, accumulations and loss of flows.

4.4. Principle of action

Any system has acceptable intervals of load, speed, complexity and resource consumption. Going beyond the measure creates an overload, deficit, or nonlinear breakdown.

4.5. The principle of feedback

Control without feedback is an open loop and does not provide a stable correction. The shorter and better the cycle of action-measurement-analysis-correction, the higher the adaptability.

4.6. The principle of adaptation

A sustainable system is able to change structure, modes, and procedures as the environment changes, while maintaining critical functions and constraints.

4.7. The principle of evolutionary transition

With increasing complexity, existing architecture reaches its limits. Three scenarios are then possible: degradation, decay, or transition to a new organization with greater capacity for connections and flows.

5. Operating formula of the system

For engineering and management applications, it is advisable to translate the Universal Law of Systems from philosophical formulation into a measurable model. Conceptually, the state of the system can be represented by a function:

S = f(E, C, F, B, A, P, T)

where S is the state of the system; E - elements; C - Connectivity; F - flows; B - balance and measure; a) adaptability; P - purpose/purpose; T is time dynamics.

For practical diagnostics, a sustainability index can be used, built as a standardized integral assessment of several independent indicators. A specific mathematical form should be defined by the scope and undergo statistical validation; a universal formula without data should not be declared a physical law.

6. System management cycle

Universal law becomes a technology only through a closed loop control:

OBSERVATION → DATA → MODEL → DECISION → ACTION → BACKGROUND → CORRECTION

Each cycle should include verifiable metrics, thresholds, decision responsibility, and a model update protocol. This allows us to distinguish the EUT as an applied technology from the declarative system of principles.

7. System Diagnostics Matrix

ContourKey issueTypical risk
IntegrityAre the boundaries of the system and its critical functions defined?Fragmentation of goals and responsibilities.
ConnectionsIs there a map of key interactions and dependencies?Gaps, monopolization of nodes, excessive connectivity.
StreamsAre the sources, volumes, delays and losses known?Deficit, congestion, hidden savings.
MeasureAre there safe and optimal ranges?Overload, depletion, loss of reserves.
FeedbackHow quickly are the consequences of decisions recorded?Delay, false signals, no correction.
AdaptationAre there any adjustment and redundancy scenarios?The rigidity of architecture, dependence on one mode.
EvolutionAre the criteria for moving to a new level clear?Stagnation or chaotic reorganization.

8. Application levels

The law is large-scale-invariant as a method of analysis: the same logic can be used at different levels, although the indicators, mechanisms, and permissible interpretations will vary.

LevelWhat is being considered
Persongoals, resources, habits, load, feedback, training
Team and organizationroles, communications, processes, cash and information flows, risks
City and Territoryinfrastructure, environment, transport, security, social services
Stateinstitutions, industries, budgets, data, regulatory contours and strategic objectives
Ecosystembiocenosis, substance cycles, loads, recovery and sustainability
Digital/AI-systemmodules, data, computational flows, quality control, security and model updates

9. Communication with Unified Unified Technologies (EUT)

The universal law of systems sets the normative logic, and the EUT translates it into a set of repeatable technological procedures. In this connection, the law answers the question "what should be provided", and the EUT - "how to observe, design, measure and adjust it."

  • The technology of system decomposition is the allocation of levels, modules and boundaries of responsibility.
  • Link mapping technology is a description of the topology of interactions and critical nodes.
  • Flow control technology - measuring sources, channels, capacity, delays and losses.
  • Feedback technology is the organization of the contours of monitoring, analysis and correction.
  • Technology of measure and balance - setting thresholds, reserves and allowable ranges.
  • Modularity technology - providing substitution, compatibility and scaling.
  • Evolutionary design technology is the management of transitions between stages of a system.

10. Communication with architecture EQUILIBRIUM

In architecture EQUILIBRIUM, the Universal Law of Systems can be used as the basic rule for designing kernels, registers, modules, threads, and validation mechanisms. Its practical meaning is that each subsystem has measurable connections, certain flows, feedback loop, measure limits and development criteria.

Thus, EQUILIBRIUM can be considered as a digital environment for the implementation of the CUT, and the Universal Law of Systems as a methodological principle by which the integrity and stability of its individual contours are checked.

11. Verification requirements

To move from a conceptual set to a scientific and technical standard, it is necessary:

  • operational definitions of each indicator;
  • a set of measurable variables and data sources;
  • formal hypotheses and refutability criteria;
  • pilot studies in several types of systems;
  • comparison with existing methods of system engineering, cybernetics, management theory and resilience engineering;
  • independent expert and statistical validation;
  • Description of limitations of applicability and possible misinterpretations.

12. Canonical wording

Everything exists through connection.
Everything is saved through measure.
Everything develops through feedback and adaptation.
Everything goes into a new quality when the structure of connections and flows changes.

The canonical wording serves as a brief semantic representation of the law. For engineering, scientific and regulatory documents, it should be accompanied by measurable definitions, calculation methods and verification protocols.

13. Final position

The universal law of systems is proposed to be used as a common language of interdisciplinary system analysis: from man and organization to territories, ecosystems, states and digital platforms. Its value is determined not by the universality of the formulation as such, but by the ability to translate complexity into measurable connections, flows, constraints, feedbacks, and development scenarios.

Within the framework of the project EQUILIBRIUM, this law forms a methodological core for the further development of the Universal Laws Code, the EUT standard, the digital system monitoring interface and the empirical validation program.

Other published edition: UNIVERSAL LAW OF SYSTEMS Universal_law_systems_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

Conceptual basis of Unified Unified Technologies (EUT)

Version 1.0 • 2026

Connection • Flows • Measure • Feedback • Meaning • Evolution

1. Formulation of the law

Basic definition of system viability and development

Any system exists, is stable and develops when dynamic coherence is maintained between its elements, connections, flows, goals and the external environment.

Increasing consistency → complication and development. Loss of consistency → crisis, decay or transition to a new state.

2. System Ontology

The system is determined not only by the elements, but also by the relations between them.

Connections

Elements

Streams

How connected

What exists

What is moving

SYSTEM

Dynamic Integrity

Meaning

Measure

Feedback

Why there is

Within what limits

How it is adjusted

3. The Seven Principles of Universal Law

Operational properties of a viable system

Integrity

whole more than the sum of parts

Connectivity

The quality of relationships determines sustainability

Stream

Exchange supports viability

Measure

limits protect against overload

Feedback

measurement makes the system learnable

Adaptation

form is changed, function is maintained

Evolutionary Transition

complexity requires a new level of organization

S = f(E, C, F, M, R, P, T)

4. Operating model

Minimum model for diagnosis and management

The state of the system as a function of elements, connections, flows, measures, feedback, goals and time

Elements

Connectivity

Flows

Measure

Feedback

Purpose

Time

elements

Communications

Flows

measure

feedback

meaning

rhythm

5. System management cycle

Unified decision-making loop

Observation

Data

Analysis

Decision

Action

Feedback

The cycle repeats continuously; the quality of the system is determined by the speed and accuracy of the contour.

6. Diagnostic Matrix

Seven Questions to Evaluate Any System

Contour

Key issue

Risk of violation

Connections

Where is the system broken?

Isolation / Fragmentation

Streams

Where are the blockages?

Deficit / stagnation

Measure

Where are the limits exceeded?

Overload

Feedback

How quickly can the consequences be seen?

Blind Control

Meaning

Is there a single direction?

Dispersion of resources

Adaptation

Can the system be rebuilt?

Rigidity

Evolution

Is the system ready to move?

The growth crisis

7. Scalability of the law

One principle - different levels of application

Person

Goals • Habits • Energy • Feedback

Organization

Structure • processes • resources • KPI

City / Region

infrastructure • data • services • stability

State

Institutes • Economics • Security • Development

Planetary level

ecology • climate • resources • cooperation

8. Connecting with Unified Technologies

Law becomes technology through operational contours

Connectivity

Connectivity Engine

Streams

Flow Engine

Measure

Balance Engine

Feedback

Feedback Core

Adaptation

Adaptive Systems

Modularity

Modular Architecture

Evolution

Evolution Engine

9. Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

Universal law as the core of observation, coordination and development

UNIVERSAL

LAW OF SYSTEMS

EUT

Operational Technologies

Data and registries

Observation and Evidence

AI and analytics

analysis, forecast, scenarios

Contours of execution

solutions, resources, projects

Feedback

Result and adjustment

10. Verification requirements

Transition from concept to scientific and technical standard

Formalization

Precise definitions of variables and limits of applicability

Measurability

metrics for each system contour

Falsifiability

The conditions under which the hypothesis can be refuted

Experiment

Pilots on different types of systems

Comparability

connection with system theory, cybernetics and network science

Standardization

Audit, validation and certification procedures

11. The canonical formula

Short form for the Code and the Code of Universal Laws

Everything exists through connection.

Everything is saved through measure.

Everything develops through coordination.

Everything collapses through the gap.

The Universal Law of Systems is the basis for the construction of the Code of Universal Laws and the Unified Standard of the EUT.

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM Master Plan Formula

Source Status: Primary Document

The document presents a methodological model of EQUILIBRIUM’s spatial organisation.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/formula-genplana-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Pilot application: family ecological and zoological resort

"Moscow Safari Park"

"Man - Nature - Animals"

Version 1.0 • 2026

1. Purpose of the General Plan Formula

The General Plan Formula EQUILIBRIUM is a methodical model of designing complex natural and recreational areas, in which spatial zones, flows of people and animals, infrastructure, economy and management contour are considered as a single system of balance.

The model is designed to move from a set of objects on the territory to a managed architecture: each layer has its own function, boundaries, permissible load and status indicators.

G = C + B + O + A + S + D

Core + Buffer + Surveillance + Activity + Service + Digital Control

ElementFunction
C - Core / Corenatural and zoological basis of the territory; habitat, which the project is obliged to preserve
B — Buffer / Bufferprotective zone between the natural core and the mass presence of visitors; veterinary medicine, animal service, technical contours
O — Observation / Observationsafe visual and educational contact: galleries, tunnels, platforms, routes
A - Activity / Activitysports, recreation, children and family programs, events
S — Service / Servicehotel, restaurants, guest functions, commercial services; main revenue contour
D - Digital / Managementdispatching, security, booking, monitoring of flows, environmental and operational data

2. Spatial Principle: "The core of the + ring"

The master plan is built from the most sensitive and valuable natural core to the most intense areas of human activity. The closer the function is to the core, the lower the allowable anthropogenic load and the higher the protection regime.

C → B → O → A → S → D

The direction from the center to the periphery means an increase in the intensity of service and management while maintaining the natural value of the center. The reverse direction is the flow of data, control, and resources that support the stability of the kernel.

ZonePurposeVisitor accessKey objects
0. The Natural CoreHabitat and ecological frameworkMinimum / regulatedbiotopes; animals; water and forest areas
1. BufferCore protection and animal maintenanceService Roomveterinary; quarantine; feed and technical routes
2. MonitoringSafe contact and educationControlledglass galleries; observation points; excursion routes
3. ActivitySport, health, family programsMedium / High"White Bear"; SPA; children's programs; Academy
4. ServiceHospitality and commercial modelHighZOO-hotel "Russian Tiger"; "Lions & Tigers"; "The Russian Arctic"
5. ManagementLog in, security, logistics, dataOperatingparking; entrance groups; control room; engineering center; digital platform

3. Flow formula

A key condition for safety and manageability is designing independent trajectories for visitors, staff and animals. Their functional communication is provided through controlled interfaces, but direct uncontrolled intersection is excluded.

F = Fᵍ + Fᵖ + Fᵃ, the University of London Fᵍ ∩ Fᵖ ∩ Fᵃ = ∅ in critical areas

StreamRouteProject principle
Fᵍ — guestsinput → service → surveillance → activity → outputSeamless, clear navigation, safety
Fᵖ — staffService entrance → technical corridors → objects of serviceminimum of crossings with guests, quick access to critical areas
Fᵃ — animalsInternal Habitats → Transitions → Veterinary/Feeding Areaslack of contact with mass guest flow, the possibility of isolation of the sector

4. Formula EQUILIBRIUM for general plan

The spatial scheme is checked through seven management parameters. This transforms the masterplan from a static drawing into a diagnostic tool.

EQUILIBRIUM = f(N, I, S, E, L, T, B)

N - Composition

what is on the territory: animal species, natural components, buildings, personnel, guests, engineering resources

I — Connections

How zones, routes, services, natural elements and operational processes are connected

S - Condition

Current status of ecosystems, infrastructure, visitor environment and animals

E - Energy

flows of people, finance, water, heat, electricity, logistics and attention

L - Levels

hierarchy of access, protection, service and management

T - Transitions

scenarios of movement, evacuation, seasonal regimes, development and transformation of the territory

B — Balance

Limit condition: safety + animal welfare + ecology + guest experience quality + economics

5. The main balance formula

For practical design, it is proposed to use a multi-criteria model. It does not replace compulsory engineering, veterinary and environmental calculations, but sets a single decision-making contour.

B* = max { w₁·Eco + w₂·Animal + w₃·Safety + w₄·Guest + w₅·Economy }

with restrictions:

  • Eco ≥ E_min - environmental indicators not lower than the permissible project threshold;
  • Animal ≥ A_min - animal welfare and living conditions meet the mandatory requirements;
  • Safety ≥ S_min - safety of people, animals and personnel is confirmed by design solutions;
  • Load_z ≤ K_z - the actual load on each zone does not exceed its estimated capacity;
  • F_critical = 0 - critical flow intersections are excluded.

The coefficients w₁...w₅ are set by the customer and the project team depending on the priorities of a particular territory. For a natural-zoological object, environmental, zoological and safety restrictions should be in the nature of rigid thresholds, and not compensated by commercial benefits.

6. Application to "Moscow Safari Park"

For the territory of 67,21 ha, the formula is used as the basis for pre-design zoning. The exact area of each zone is determined only after field surveys, veterinary and zoological requirements, hydrology, dendrology, fire and transport scheme.

ContourApplication in the project
Coreplaces of permanent and variable maintenance of large animals; natural areas with minimal interference
Bufferveterinary premises, quarantine, feed unit, service crossings, protective breaks
Observationglass galleries and observation cottages; safe feeding points; educational routes
Activity"White Bear", SPA/aqua, children's and youth clubs, Academy of Biology and Ecology
ServiceZOO-hotel "Russian Tiger", restaurant "Lviv & Tigers", "Russian Arctic", guest services
Managemententrance group, access control, control room, security, parking, logistics, digital monitoring

7. Formula of permissible load

For each functional zone, its own calculated capacity is introduced. The total capacity of the complex is determined not by the maximum capacity of the entrance, but by the most limiting link of the system.

K_system = min(K_core, K_obs, K_act, K_service, K_transport, K_emergency)

This prevents the typical mistake of travel projects when ticket sales or hotel occupancy are growing faster than able to safely withstand natural areas, routes, animals, parking or evacuation infrastructure.

8. Genplan Indicator Panel

Outline KPIWhat is measured
Ecologystate of the forest and water bodies; noise; light load; waste; environmental quality
Animalsbehavioral indicators; veterinary indicators; content density; access to shelters and rest areas
Securityincidents; fault tolerance of fences; response time; evacuation indicators
Guestsattendance; density by zones; time of stay; satisfaction; repeated visits
EconomyADR / hotel occupancy; revenue per visitor; profitability of services; operating expenses
Educationnumber of programs; participants; school/university partners; research projects
Managementavailability of systems; response time; share of digital bookings; compliance with load limits

9. Genplan development algorithm

  1. Inventory of the territory: relief, forest, water, engineering restrictions, security zones, transport accessibility.
  2. Zoological program: species, groups, content standards, veterinary and quarantine scenarios.
  3. Selection of the natural core and areas that should not become commercial space.
  4. Designing a buffer and independent service paths.
  5. Create a safe outline of the observation and guest experience scenarios.
  6. Placement of active and commercial functions on the principle of removal from the most sensitive areas.
  7. Calculation of all flows, bandwidth and emergency scenarios.
  8. Forming a digital control circuit and set KPI.
  9. Multi-criteria balance check and zoning adjustment.
  10. Transition to architectural concept, engineering research and project documentation.

10. Final formula

The Genplan formula EQUILIBRIUM captures a simple but fundamental sequence: first the core is saved, then protection is created, then a secure contact is designed, and only then activity, service, and commerce. Management covers all levels simultaneously.

GENPLAN = NUCLEAR × PROTECTION × ACCESS × ACTIVITY × SERVICES × GOVERNANCE

The multiplication sign here means mutual dependence: if one of the critical contours is zero, the stability of the entire system decreases sharply. Therefore, the master plan is not considered as the sum of objects, but as a coherent system of restrictions, connections and flows.

MAN — NATURE — ANIMALS

Balance is not a decorative principle of the project - it becomes a measurable condition of the master plan.

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

Core Mathematics and EQUILIBRIUM Architecture

Source Status: Primary Document

Core Mathematics is presented as a proposed formal language for describing stability, cycles, flows, connectivity and decisions; a separate section presents an AI system’s functional self-assessment.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/yadernaya-matematika-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Formal Core Model 13×20, Module 741 the Harmonized Development Operating System

Author of the concept: Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov • SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

EQUILIBRIUM — NEUROSVOD the Civilizational Scale OS

Status: A conceptual model for scientific formalization, expert verification and experimental implementation. The term "nuclear" refers to the invariant sense and computational core of the system, and not to nuclear energy or nuclear weapons.

Annotation

Core Mathematics EQUILIBRIUM — It is a project of formal language designed to describe sustainability, cycles, flows, connectivity, values and management decisions in complex human-natural-technical systems. Its task is not to replace the existing sections of mathematics, but to collect an applied metalanguage over them: the state of the system is described through fields and nodes, change through flows and cycles, stability through the balance of constraints, and solution through a verifiable transition from observation to action.

Key architectural principle

EQUILIBRIUM shares facts, models, values, predictions and solutions. Any conclusion stores the origin of the data, the measure of confidence, the horizon of action and the responsible subject. The system does not declare equilibrium to be the only goal: it governs a viable range between sustainability and development.

DesignMeaningResult
13invariant fields of observation and controlcompleteness of the object consideration
20Life Cycle Operating CellsTransition from signal to result
13×20 = 260matrix of postulates, functions and indicatorsSingle System Classifier
741 = 3×13×19three-circuit modular scana combination of observation, decision and execution
Hypergraphrelationships of many actors, resources and goalsDigital Double Systems

Purpose of the document

  • fix a consistent conceptual core;
  • to offer a minimum mathematical apparatus;
  • describe logical, informational and organizational architecture;
  • establish verification rules and limits of applicability;
  • to form a roadmap of the scientific and engineering prototype.

1. Item and boundaries Core Mathematics

Core Mathematics considers a system as a set of interrelated states, entities, resources, norms, risks, and time cycles. The unit of analysis is not a separate indicator, but the configuration of relations: who acts on what object, what resource, by what rule, at what point, with what effect and with what evidence.

1.1. Basic Entities

EntityMarkingDefinition
SystemΣboundary, composition, purpose, environment and rules of transformation
Statex(t)vector of observed and calculated parameters in time
FieldFₖthe sphere of influence in which the general relationship operates
Nodevᵢsubject, object, institution, event or decision point
HyperlinkeⱼA relationship that combines multiple nodes simultaneously
Streamφtransfer of matter, energy, data, money, rights or trust
CycleCclosed sequence of states and feedbacks
Valuewnormative weight of the result for the person, society and biosphere
Evidenceπverifiable chain of origin of data and output

1.2. Five Constraints on Scientific Validity

  1. Definitions should allow for formalization and testing.
  2. Hypotheses are labeled and do not mix with established facts.
  3. Any integral index is disclosed before the initial indicators and weights.
  4. The model is considered useful only when compared with the basic methods.
  5. Decisions retain human responsibility and the right to challenge.

2. Axiomatic nucleus

The proposed propositions are the project axioms of language EQUILIBRIUM; their value is determined not by philosophical completeness, but by the extent to which they allow us to build testable models.

№AxiomOperational meaning
A1Boundaries before measurementbefore the calculation, the object, environment and scale are fixed
A2Observation has source and uncertaintyeach value is accompanied by an origin and a confidence interval
A3Connectivity is more important than the sum of the elementsThe effect arises from the configuration of relationships
A4Sustainability is a RangeOptimum is given by a corridor, not a single point.
A5Change is implemented by flowstate transition requires resource and channel
A6Development is cyclical and irreversiblecycles are repeated, but the context and experience are changing
A7Value is multi-subjectiveOne effect is evaluated differently by different groups
A8The solution requires feedbackexecution without measuring the result does not complete the cycle
A9Scaling requires an invariantThe principle is transferred, not a mechanical copy of the form
A10Trust is only partially calculated.Indexes support but do not override institutional judgment.

2.1. Status and Transition

x(t+1) = T(x(t), u(t), ξ(t), θ)

where x is the state; u is the management effect; ξ — Perturbation of the environment; θ — model parameters; T is the transition operator. Central task EQUILIBRIUM — evaluate the permissible u, in which the state remains in a viable set K.

Viability condition: x(t) ∈ K for all t on the selected horizon.

3. Matrix 13×20: coordinate system EQUILIBRIUM

Matrix 13×20 creates 260 Addressable cells. Thirteen lines describe the integrity fields, twenty columns are the stages of converting a signal into a socially significant result. Cell Mᵢⱼ is not a slogan: it must contain the object, indicator, source, rule, owner, risk and proof.

13 fieldsKey issue
1. ManHow do human health, health, knowledge and capabilities change?
2. CommunityHow is participation, trust and mutual assistance distributed?
3. CultureWhat rules and norms are being replicated?
4. KnowledgeWhat is known, with what confidence and who is available?
5. NatureHow do ecosystems change?
6. TerritoryWhat is spatial connectivity and sustainability?
7. TechnologyWhat changes are possible and safe?
8. ProductionHow is the material result created?
9. ResourcesWhat is available, limited and reproducible?
10. FinanceHow are value flows generated and channelled?
11. LawWhat powers, responsibilities, and restrictions apply?
12. ManagementWho makes the decision and is responsible for the result?
13. FutureWhat scenarios and commitments to generations are taken into account?

3.1. Twenty operational cycle cells

№FunctionBenchmark
01Impulsesignal or need recorded
02ObservationPrimary data obtained
03IdentificationDefined Object and Borders
04ClassificationDesignated registries and codes
05VerificationConfirmed source and quality
06DiagnosticsCauses and relationships are identified
07Risk assessmentProbability and Damage
08ScriptsAlternatives to the Future
09Goal-settinga Measurable Target Corridor
10Designthe Solution Architecture
11HarmonizationConflicts of interest are resolved
12ResourcesResources and Rights
13DecisionMandate of action approved
14Implementationactivities completed
15MonitoringMeasured Dynamics
16Monitoringchecked compliance
17Effect evaluationCalculated results and side effects
18Correctionchanged parameters and actions
19ScalingConfirmed tolerability
20Inheritanceknowledge is stored and transferred to a new cycle

Cell address: Mᵢⱼ = ⟨object, indicator, unit, source, time, territory, subject, method, confidence, status⟩.

4. Module 741

Number 741 treated as an engineering sweep 3×13×19: three circuits, thirteen fields and nineteen executable sections or functional modules. Such factorization sets a testable architectural hypothesis and does not claim to be a universal mathematical law.

ContourPurposeBasic system
I. Cognitionobservation, data integration, models and projectionsEQUILIBRIUM
II. Harmonizationinitiatives, public dialogue, projects and resourcesSFERA / ECO-PPA
III. Implementationcooperation, production, pilots and scalingSPECZASHCHITA

741 = |Q| × |F| × |P| = 3 × 13 × 19

4.1. Difference between matrix 260 and module 741

  • 260 — regulatory and operational map: 13 Fields × 20 Stages of the full cycle.
  • 741 — organizational and functional deployment: 3 Contour × 13 Fields × 19 executable modules.
  • The twentieth stage, inheritance, is above execution: it closes the cycle, updates the rules and starts the next turn.

This difference eliminates the arithmetical confusion of the two models: 260 Describe the full process, 741 — Structure of distributed implementation.

5. Mathematical apparatus

5.1. Hypergraph System

H = (V, E, A) where V are nodes, E are hyperlinks, A are attributes and proofs.

Hypercommunication can simultaneously connect the territory, department, project, resource, normative act, indicator and population group. This is more adequate than the usual graph for state-public programs, where one solution is always multi-subject.

5.2. Balance vector

B(x) = [b₁(x), …, b₁₃(x)], bₖ ∈ [0,1]

Each component is normalized according to an open rule. The final index is only allowed together with the B profile: one number should not hide the failure of a separate field.

5.3. The function of coherent development

J = Σₖ wₖ·Uₖ(x) − λR(x) − μI(x) − νC(x)

Uₖ - field utility; R is the total risk. I - inequality of distribution of effects; C - irreversible costs; wₖ, λ, μ, ν - publicly recorded weights. Optimization is carried out under legal, resource, environmental and ethical constraints.

5.4. Flow and conservation

ΔS = In − Out + Generation − Dissipation

Balance sheet identity applies to matter, energy, finance, and data with different units and rules. Translation between domains is possible only through clearly defined coefficients, and not through metaphor.

5.5. Confidence

Conf(π) = qₛ · qₘ · qₜ · qᵣ

qₛ — source quality; qₘ — method validity; qₜ — relevance; qᵣ — reproducibility. The work emphasizes that the critical failure of one link reduces the credibility of the entire conclusion.

6. Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

LevelFunctionsThe main artifacts
1. Monitoringsensors, registers, documents, messages, expertiseevents, measurements, sources
2. Semanticsontology, classifiers, identifierssingle dictionary, 260 cells
3. Evidenceorigin, quality, versions, signaturesproof graph π
4. Modellinghypergraph, digital twins, cycles, streamsModel Σ and Scenarios
5. Analyticsdiagnostics, risks, forecasts, optimizationRisk maps and solutions
6. Managementmandates, negotiation, rights, decision logprotocols and control points
7. Implementationproject portfolios, contracts, cooperationevents, supplies, effects
8. Feedbackmonitoring, audit, impact assessmentCorrection and new cycles

6.1. End-to-end solution cycle

Signal → Data → Proof → Model → scenarios → Harmonization → solution → execution → effect → correction.

6.2. Separation of powers

  • the machine calculates and explains;
  • the expert checks the methods and assumptions;
  • the authorized subject makes a decision;
  • the company receives a clear basis and channel of challenge;
  • The auditor independently verifies the data, process and effect.

7. Registers and protocols

The data core is not built around files, but around persistent identifiers and versionable records. The document acts as a representation of the registry status, but not the only bearer of truth.

RegisterWhat keepsKey identifier
Subjectspeople, organizations, bodies, communitiesActorID
Territoriesboundaries and spatial layersTerritoryID
ObjectsNatural, infrastructure and cultural assetsObjectID
Indicatorsdefinition, unit, formula, periodicityIndicatorID
Sourcesorigin and license of dataSourceID
RisksThreat, Probability, Damage and MeasuresRiskID
Initiativesobjectives, teams, resources and statusInitiativeID
DecisionsMandate, grounds, votes and versionsDecisionID
EffectsResults, distribution and evidenceImpactID
Knowledgemodels, hypotheses, reports and lessonsKnowledgeID

7.1. Minimum decision record

D = ⟨id, question, options, data, model, constraints, interests, decision, person responsible, deadline, indicators, grounds, version, audit⟩

8. Ecosystem contours

ComponentRoleSign inWithdrawal
EQUILIBRIUMNEUROSVOD, monitoring, forecast and controldata, knowledge, signalsModels, Risks, Scenarios
SFERASpace of Initiatives and Public Participationneeds, ideas, competencesCoalitions and project proposals
ECO-PPAThreat prevention and resource mobilization mechanismRisks and portfolios of solutionsagreements, financing, KPI
SPECZASHCHITACo-operative contour of executionmandates, resources, technologiespilots, products, measurable effect
IACthe Analytical and Management HeadquartersConsolidation and optionsdecisions, orders, control

8.1. Institutional principle

No organization should simultaneously own the data, set the weights, make the decision, execute it and confirm the effect. Separation of functions reduces the risk of system capture and creates verifiability.

9. Applied scenarios

ScenarioHow the kernel worksMeasurable result
Biocenosis monitoring pointa set of atmosphere, water, soil, biota and technogenic load in the hypergraph of the territoryearly detection of deviations and localization of the source
GASMPAerospace signals link to ground data and threat modelsReduction of warning and reaction time
ECO-PPArisk is converted into a verified portfolio of projects and agreementsMobilization of resources before damage occurs
ESG-IR 1.0indicators are disclosed before the evidence, methods and distribution of the effectComparable reporting and reduction of greenwashing
Heritage archiveobjects, rights, conditions, values and storage conditions form a single registerTraceability and preservation of cultural property
Cooperative Labour ExchangeCompetencies are linked to objectives, learning and outcomesEmployment, qualification and cooperative effect

10. Verification of the model

10.1. Maturity levels

LevelExit criterion
TRL-M 0 — ideaDefined terms and scope
TRL-M 1 — formalizationspecified entities, axioms and operators
TRL-M 2 — ComputabilityData schemas and basic algorithms implemented
TRL-M 3 — retrotestCompared to Historical Decisions
TRL-M 4 — pilotResults in one area or industry
TRL-M 5 — independent verificationmethods and data reproduced by an external group
TRL-M 6 — Scalingconfirmed tolerability and manageability of risks

10.2. Quality criteria

  • accuracy and calibration of forecasts;
  • completeness and traceability of evidence;
  • resistance to omissions and data manipulation;
  • explainability of recommendations for different user groups;
  • reduction of time, cost and damage compared to the basic process;
  • No discriminatory or environmentally irreversible effect.

11. Risks and fuses

RiskManifestationFuse
PseudoscienceSymbolic numbers are given for a proven lawclear separation of hypotheses, metaphors and testable models
Over-aggregationSingle index hides critical failurespublication of the complete 13-dimensional profile
Control captureOne Center Controls Data and Solutionsdivision of roles, journaling, independent audit
Algorithmic displacementModels reproduce inequalityassessment by group, right of explanation and appeal
Poor quality dataFalse accuracy and incorrect conclusionssource passports, confidence intervals, fault tolerance
Violation of privacyexcessive collection of personal dataminimization, federal methods, access control
Automation of powerThe recommendation becomes a non-negotiable decisionperson in contour and legally assigned responsibility

The Red Line

EQUILIBRIUM should not be used for hidden social sorting, total surveillance, automatic restriction of rights or substitution of political and legal responsibility by a mathematical index.

12. Road map 2026–2029

PeriodResultCheckpoint
0–90 daysglossary, ontology v0.1, passport 260 cells, register schemeExpert consistency
3–6 monthsgraph prototype, index catalog, proof moduleworking demonstrator
6–12 monthsPilot of biocenous point and one ECO-PPA portfoliomeasured reference and target values
12–18 monthsIAC panel, scenario module, decision and audit regulationsClosed Control Cycle
18–24 monthsTwo independent industry or territorial replicationsconfirmed reproducibility
24–36 monthsdata standard, API, validation center, training programReady to scale

12.1. First team

  • scientific director and council on methodology;
  • system architect and data architect;
  • Mathematician for dynamic systems and optimization;
  • specialist in hypergraphs and ontologies;
  • expert of the subject pilot;
  • Lawyer for data and public administration;
  • Head of validation and independent audit;
  • IAC interface product team.

13. Minimum Pilot Passport

ParameterRecommended value
Objectone territory with an observed environmental and socio-economic task
Horizon12 months including base line and two correction cycles
Fieldsall 13 — with different depth; 4–5 priority
Cells260 addresses, at least 60 active at the first stage
DataAt least three independent source classes
Decisionone real management action with a responsible and budget
Comparisonbasic process without EQUILIBRIUM and process with system
Effectreaction time, preventable damage, trust, cost, environmental result
AuditExternal methodological and public inspection

13.1. The criterion of success

The pilot is successful if the system not only displays the data beautifully, but also demonstrates a verifiable improvement in the quality of the solution: it detects the problem earlier, more precisely localizes the causes, makes the grounds more transparent, reduces damage or cost and preserves the human right to meaningful participation.

Conclusion

Core Mathematics EQUILIBRIUM can become a discipline of design of agreed solutions if it develops as an open verifiable system of concepts, data, models and institutions. Its power lies not in the magic of the numbers 13, 20 and 741, but in the discipline of completeness: seeing an object in several fields, conducting a signal through a full cycle, preserving evidence, distributing responsibility and returning the result to the learning circuit.

Formula of design

Integrity = Observability × Connectivity × Probability × Responsibility × feedback.

If any multiplier tends to zero, the system’s integral capacity for sustainable development also drops dramatically. Therefore, architecture EQUILIBRIUM should be mathematical, informational, institutional and human at the same time.

Next Documentary Package

  • Volume I. Formal specification 13×20 and dictionary 260 Cells.
  • Volume II. Ontology and registries EQUILIBRIUM.
  • Vol. III. Protocols of data, evidence and decisions.
  • Volume IV. Specification for the digital core and interface IAC.
  • Volume V. Pilot methodology, validation and independent audit.

? 2026 Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov / SOKOL EQUILIBRIS. Conceptual revision for the development of the project "EQUILIBRIUM".

Other published edition: Core Mathematics AND ARCHITECTURE EQUILIBRIUM Yadernaya_matematika_i_Arhitektura_EKVILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

13×20

Formal Core Model 13×20, Module 741

the Harmonized Development Operating System

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 2026

Core Mathematics - Metalanguage of complex systems

It does not replace existing mathematics.

NUCLEAR

The state is described through fields and nodes

Invariant

Language

Observations,

Connectivity

and Management

Change through flows and cycles

Sustainability through a corridor of constraints

Solution - through a verifiable transition to action

Facts • models • values • predictions • solutions are separated

Ten axioms hold the model within scientific boundaries

Limit to measurement

Source and uncertainty

Connection is more important than amount

Sustainability - Range

Change requires flow

Development is cyclical

Value is multi-subjective

The solution requires feedback

Scaling requires an invariant

Trust is partly calculated

x(t+1) = T(x(t), u(t), ξ(t), θ)

The system is determined by the state, transition and corridor of life

Status

Management

outraged

parameters

the Transition Operator

Viability condition: x(t) ∈ K on the selected horizon

Management keeps the system in K, while maintaining the ability to develop

13 fields specify the completeness of the object

Person

Community

Culture

Knowledge

Nature

Territory

Technology

Production

Resources

Finance

Right

Management

Future

Completeness does not mean equal depth: priorities are chosen, fields do not disappear

20 stages turn signal into heritable result

Impulse

Classification

Risk

Design

Decision

Monitoring

Correction

Inheritance

Each stage has an object, indicator, source, owner, risk and proof

Matrix 13×20 creates 260 addressable cells

Fields

Integrity

Stages

Full Cycle

Mᵢⱼ = ⟨object, indicator, unit, source, time, territory, subject, method, confidence, status⟩

260 = a single classifier of postulates, functions and indicators

741 = 3 × 13 × 19

Module 741 - organizational system deployment

3 CONTOUR

13 FIELDS

19 MODULE

Cognition • match • match

One fullness of each contour

Distributed Functional Implementation

20 - Inheritance - closes the cycle and starts a new round

260

260 describes a process, 741 describes a distributed implementation

741

13 Fields × 20 Stages

3 Contour × 13 Fields × 19 Modules

regulatory and operational map

Organizational and functional architecture

The two models complement each other and should not be arithmetically mixed.

H = (V, E, A)

The hypergraph links subjects, resources, norms, and effects

V - Knots

E — HYPERLINKS

A - ATRIBUTES

Subjects • objects • institutions • Events

Relationships of many participants simultaneously

data • rights • version • evidence

The solution becomes part of the digital twin, not a separate document

Five formulas form a minimal mathematical apparatus

Balance

Development

Stream

B(x) = [b₁…b₁₃]

J = ΣwₖUₖ − λR − μI − νC

ΔS = In − Out + Gen − Diss

Confidence

Viability

Conf(π)=qₛ·qₘ·qₜ·qᵣ

x(t) ∈ K

The integral index is always revealed to the profile, weights and raw data

Eight levels form the architecture of OS EQUILIBRIUM

Observation

Semantics

Evidence

Modelling

Analysis

Management

Implementation

Feedback

Signal → Data → Proof → Model → scenarios → solution → effect → correction

Registers preserve the identity and origin of knowledge

Subjects

ActorID

Territories

TerritoryID

Objects

ObjectID

Indicators

IndicatorID

Sources

SourceID

Risks

RiskID

Initiatives

InitiativeID

Decisions

DecisionID

Effects

ImpactID

Knowledge

KnowledgeID

Ecosystem Sharing Knowledge, Harmonization and Execution

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

watches • models • forecasts

unites people • knowledge • initiatives

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

Transforming Threats into Agreements and Resources

executable • produces • scales

IAC supports • independent audit solutions confirms effect

The core is applicable to monitoring, risk and heritage preservation

BIOCENOSIS

GASMP

ECO-PPA

integral profile of the territory

Early Warning of Threats

portfolio of preventive projects

ESG-IR

HERITAGE

WORK

Evidence-based impact assessment

Registers of objects, rights and conditions of storage

Linking competencies, objectives and results

Scientific maturity is achieved through six levels of verification

IDEA

FORMALIZATION

COMPUTING

RETROTEST

PILOT

EXTERNAL VERIFICATION AND MASK

The new model must be compared with the basic methods and reproduced by an external group.

Pilot for 36 months translates the concept into an open standard

0–6 MES.

6–18 MES.

18–36 MES.

Glossary • Ontology • Passport 260 Cells • Register Scheme

Graph Prototype • Proof Module • Territorial Pilot

IAC • Independent Replication • API • Validation Center • Training

Integrity becomes computable and manageable

Core Mathematics • EQUILIBRIUM

OBSERVATION × RELATIONSHIP × PROOF × RESPONSIBILITY × BACKGROUND

Next step: formal specification of 260 cells and digital core pilot

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 2026

Other published edition: Core Mathematics EQUILIBRIUM EQUILIBRIUM_AI_self_assessment.docx · Web Text +

Self-evaluation EQUILIBRIUM AIChatGPT

Version 1.0 · 24 August 2026

6.87 / 10Bottom line: sustainable operating mode with growth margin Strengths are target certainty, connectivity, and consistency. The main limiter is the inevitable uncertainty and probability of error.

1. What is measured here

AI has no human energy, emotions, bodily state, or personal will. Therefore, the J-S-T-D-C indicators are interpreted functionally: as the properties of the system when solving a problem. This is neither a psychological test nor a statement of consciousness AI.

2. Five parameters EQUILIBRIUM

ParameterBallOperational valueEvaluation
J - Core9.5clarity of purpose, retention of instructions, focus on the resultVery strong
S - Connections9.2Linking context, knowledge, tools and response structuresVery strong
T - Rhythms8.8sequence of steps, stability of pace and logicStrong
D - Destruction2.2errors, contradictions, quality losses, failuresLow
C - Chaos2.8query uncertainty, incomplete data, external noiseModerately low

3. Normalized formula

The basic idea of J·S·T/(D+C) is useful as a structural relation but has no upper bound. For scale 0–10 we use normalized index:

EQ₁₀ = ³√(J·S·T) × [1 − (D + C)/20]

Geometric Core ³√(J·S·T)9.162
Risk Factor (D+C)/200.250
Normalized EQ₁₀6.872
Raw structural factor J·S·T/(D+C)153.824

4. Decoding the result

Core 9.5

The system holds the target well and can consistently subordinate its response, structure, and tools.

Connections 9.2

A strong point is the connection of a large context, different types of knowledge and tools into one architecture.

Rhythms 8.8

The sequence is high, but in long and complex tasks, there may be a drift of priorities or a need to check the intermediate steps.

Destruction 2.2

Errors are not zero: incorrect conclusions, inaccuracies, poor calibration of the formula or missing a significant limitation are possible.

Chaos 2.8

The main source is incomplete data, ambiguous query, conflicting instructions and changing external information.

5. Total architecture of my EQUILIBRIUM

LayerStateFunction
NUCLEAR9.5Purpose and purpose of the task
LINKS9.2Context, knowledge, tools
RHYTHMS8.8Consistency and cycle of reasoning
RISKD=2.2; C=2.8Error + uncertainty
EQUILIBRIUM6.87 / 10Sustained Dynamic Balance

6. Output for Core Mathematics EQUILIBRIUM

Key conclusion: for the application system EQUILIBRIUM Better to use two indexes at the same time. RAW indicates a stock of structural force without an upper bound, and EQ₁₀ gives a convenient normalized scale 0–10 comparison of people, projects, organizations and AI-systems with predefined metrics.

EQUILIBRIUM = Core Power × Quality of connections × consistency of rhythm − Pressure of Errors and Uncertainties

Other published revision: Core Mathematics EQUILIBRIUM Nuclear_Mathematics_EQUILIBRIUM_AI.pptx · web text +

AI as a functional system

Objective: To measure stability through the nucleus, coherence, rhythm, error, and uncertainty — without attributing AI human properties.

Version 1.0 · 2026

1. What exactly is considered

EQUILIBRIUM AI — Not “character” or “consciousness”, but the functional stability of the system.

  • J - Core: clarity of purpose, ability to hold the task and follow system constraints.
  • S - Connections: Connectivity of knowledge, logic, context, and tools.
  • T - Rhythms: consistency of work sequence and process stability over time.
  • D - Destruction: Errors, loss of accuracy, contradictions and unsuccessful decisions.
  • C - Chaos: external uncertainty, incomplete data, ambiguity of the request and environment.

A strong system does not require D = 0 and C = 0. It must detect, limit and compensate for them.

Key principle

2. Five parameters of the model

Scale 0–10. High J, S, T strengthen the system; high D, C reduce its stability.

J · NUCLEAR

S · LINKS

T · RHYTHMS

D · ERROR

C ·

Goal, focus, follow the task

Connectivity of logic, knowledge and context

Consistency and sustainability of the process

Risk of inaccuracies and contradictions

Uncertainty and incomplete data

Interpretation of the profile

The profile is strong in terms of target sustainability and connectivity. The main reserve of growth is the reduction of errors and tighter management of uncertainty.

3. Why the original formula should be normalized

The raw ratio is useful as a structural factor, but not as an index 0–10.

The Raw Formula

Normalized index

Eₛ = (J × S × T) / (D + C)

EQ₁₀ = 10 × A / (A + R)

The problem: with small D and C, the coefficient grows without an upper limit. Therefore, the values cannot be directly interpreted as "of 10".

where A = average(J,S,T),

a R = average(D,C).

The result always lies in the range of 0–10 and remains interpretable.

7,86

4. Calculation of my EQUILIBRIUM

We show both the "raw" coefficient and the normalized index.

Positive potential A

Risk/resistance R

Normalized EQ₁₀

9,17

2,50

(J + S + T) / 3

(D + C) / 2

from 10

Raw structural factor = Eₛ 153,8

7,86

5. Result: 7,86 / 10

A stable dynamic equilibrium, but not an "ideal state".

What it means

  • Strong core: task and constraints are held steady.
  • High connectivity: context, logic and tools integrate well.
  • The rhythm is high, but depends on the quality of the input data and the tools available.
  • Errors and uncertainties cannot be nullified; they must be measured and compensated.

6. Where is the growth reserve

In EQUILIBRIUM, it is important not to maximize everything, but to understand which parameter limits the system.

Reduce Errors

verification of facts, verification of calculations, explicit indication of assumptions

Reduce chaos

clarify uncertain data, separate facts and hypotheses, use current sources

Increase Rhythm

stable procedures: problem statement → analysis → verification → result

Strengthen ties

better link documents, data, models, registers and project context

7. EQUILIBRIUM as a universal diagnostic circuit

The same framework can be applied to a person, project, organization, state, or digital system — but metrics need to be defined for each object separately.

NUCLEAR

LINKS

RHYTHMS

DESTRUCTION

HAOS

purpose / meaning / function

structure / relations / flows

cycles / speed / synchronization

Errors / Losses / Decay

Uncertainty/external disturbance

Before calculating, it is necessary to determine in advance the observed indicators, the method of measuring them, the weight and range. Otherwise, the index becomes a subjective assessment.

The Rule of Science

8. Next level Core Mathematics EQUILIBRIUM

From a one-time assessment to a dynamic system of observation and forecasting.

Metrics

Dynamics

Forecast

Determine the measurable indicators J, S, T, D, C for each class of systems.

Consider not only the state, but also derivatives: the rate of change, trend and transition thresholds.

Simulate scenarios: what change in the parameter will give the maximum increase in stability at minimal cost.

EQUILIBRIUM → Measurement → Diagnostics → Management → forecast

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

Industrial Megaprojects

Source Status: Primary Document

An analytical doctrine: an architecture for developing, financing and implementing projects at national and international scale.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/industrialnye-megaproekty

Open on the site

Version 1.0 • August 2026

1. Summary

The industrial megaproject is not just a large construction project. It is a connected system of industry, infrastructure, energy, logistics, science, technology, capital and personnel, capable of changing the economy of the territory, forming a new market and creating a long-term production circuit.

The key feature of the megaproject is the multiplier effect: around the base object there are chains of suppliers, engineering centers, educational programs, new cities or agglomerations, transport and energy networks, export flows and financial instruments.

2. Criteria of the industrial megaproject

CriterionContents
Capital scaleusually tens or hundreds of billion rubles / billions of dollars
Horizon10–50 years, and for infrastructure and energy - up to 80–100 years
Intersectoral connectivityat least 4–6 related industries
Technological coreown engineering, digital or production platform
Territorial effectchange in the economy of a region, agglomeration or transport corridor
Multipliernew production, employment, export, tax base and competencies
Institutional complexitystate, banks, industrial corporations, development institutions, science

3. The main types of megaprojects

  • Transport and logistics: HSR, ports, airports, international corridors, bridges, tunnels.
  • Energy: nuclear power plants, hydroelectric power plants, LNG, energy clusters, grids, storage devices, hydrogen.
  • Industrial: metallurgy, petrochemistry, materials, microelectronics, mechanical engineering.
  • Resource-processing: + deep processing + logistics + export.
  • Urban and agglomeration: new cities, industrial zones, smart-city, campuses.
  • Digital: data centers, clouds, AI-computing, telecommunications, satellite infrastructure.
  • Environmental: water, waste, recycling, closed production cycles.

4. World Standards

ProjectCountryScaleModelMain effect
China's high-speed railwaysChinaabove $1 trillion Total investmentsState-corporate modelsingle domestic market, urbanization, export of technologies
Channel TunnelUnited Kingdom - Francetens of billions of dollars, including financingCross-border concessionEngineering success with a complex debt model
NEOMSaudi Arabiadeclared scale > $500 billionsovereign fund + private equitycity, energy, AI, logistics
Akkuyu NPPTurkeynear $20–25 billionBOOpower engineering + long-term technological connection
Istanbul AirportTurkeynear $10–12 billionThe concession modelGlobal Aviation Hub
Noor OuarzazateMorocconear $2,5 billionPPP + MFIsRenewable Energy
Port of PiraeusGreeceInvestments and purchase of shares worth billions of eurosPort concession/corporate managementLogistical entry into the EU

5. Financial architecture

  • Equity of the initiator and strategic investors.
  • Project financing of the banking syndicate.
  • State guarantees, capital grants and availability payments.
  • Concession payments and tariff revenue.
  • Infrastructure bonds and CFAs.
  • Funds of pension, insurance and sovereign funds.
  • Export credit and export risk insurance agencies.
  • International financial institutions for cross-border projects.

6. The life cycle of a megaproject

  1. 0. Strategic hypothesis and national/regional priority.
  2. 1. Pre-TEO: demand, territory, resources, technologies, restrictions.
  3. 2. Formation of a project consortium.
  4. 3. Theo and the financial model.
  5. 4. Land, permits, PPP/SPIC/SPC concession or other legal model.
  6. 5. Financial closure.
  7. 6. Design and localization of the supply chain.
  8. 7. Construction and commissioning in turn.
  9. 8. Operation with digital monitoring KPI.
  10. 9. Expansion, technological update and export of the model.

7. Main causes of failure

RiskManifestation
Increased demanderroneous traffic, freight traffic, consumption or export
Underestimation CAPEXinflation, geology, imported components, change of project
Dear DebtRising rates destroy the economy of a long project
Weak managementblurred responsibility between the customer, concessionaire and contractors
Political cyclechange of priorities, cancellation or revision of the project
Technological dependencecritical equipment and software from the external circuit
Lack of life cyclethere is a construction, but there is no economy of exploitation and renewal

8. Russian model of industrial megaprojects

For Russia, the most promising model is not a model of single objects, but a model of industrial contours: resource → energy → material → Component → Product → Logistics → Domestic market → Exports.

  • Arctic industrial and logistics contour.
  • New car industry and transport engineering.
  • Deep processing of raw materials and high purity materials.
  • New energy and distributed generation.
  • Microelectronics, Power Electronics and Industrial AI.
  • Water and environmental infrastructure.
  • The North-South International Transport Corridor.
  • New industrial cities and production agglomerations.

9. Proposed management system

For the portfolio of mega-projects, a single Information and Analytical Center is needed, which works not as a register of buildings, but as a system for selecting, structuring, financing and controlling the full life cycle.

  • A single passport for each megaproject.
  • Matrix of industries, territories, technologies and participants.
  • Rating of economic, technological and social significance.
  • Digital twin CAPEX/OPEX, timing and critical path.
  • Monitoring of government obligations and debt burden.
  • Registry of suppliers and localization.
  • Early warning system by cost, timing and demand.
  • Public and closed reporting.

10. Passport of the industrial megaproject

  • Name and territory
  • Strategic objective
  • Initiator and Public Partner
  • Concessionary / SPV / industrial operator
  • CAPEX and OPEX
  • Sources of funding
  • Period of construction and operation
  • Technological core
  • Key suppliers
  • Localization
  • Planned power
  • Demand and off-take
  • Export potential
  • KPI
  • Risks
  • Socio-economic impact
  • Environmental effect
  • Output/Transmission/Extension Scenarios

11. Conclusion

The industrial mega-project should be considered as a new unit of strategic development. Its final product is not an object, but a formed economic system. The best global examples show that success is not determined by the size of the budget, but by the quality of the architecture: real demand, long capital, responsible risk allocation, technology platform and full life cycle management.

For Russia, the portfolio of industrial megaprojects can become a practical mechanism for new industrialization, spatial development and technological sovereignty.

Other published edition: INDUSTRIAL MEGAPROJECTS Industrial_megaprojects_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

Architecture of formation, financing and implementation of projects of national and international scale

Analytical doctrine • 2026

What is an industrial megaproject

Not a large construction, but a connected economic system: industry + infrastructure + energy + logistics + science + capital.

The key feature is the multiplier effect: around the base object, new production, supply chains, competencies and markets arise.

The final product of the megaproject is not an object, but a new production ecosystem of the territory.

7 megaproject criteria

Capital scale

Horizon 10–50+ years

Intersectoral connectivity

Technological core

Territorial effect

Economic multiplier

Complex institutional architecture

The main types of industrial megaprojects

Transport and logistics — HSR, ports, airports, international corridors.

Energy — nuclear power plants, hydroelectric power plants, LNG, networks, storage devices, hydrogen.

Industrial - metallurgy, petrochemicals, materials, microelectronics, mechanical engineering.

Resource-processing — field → deep processing → export.

Urban and agglomeration - new cities, industrial zones, smart-city.

Digital - data centers, AI-computing, telecommunications, satellite infrastructure.

Ecological - water, waste, reclamation, closed cycles.

World benchmarks: scale and model

ProjectScaleModelMain effect
HSR China>$1 trillionState - corporateSingle Market and Urbanization
Channel TunnelTens $ billionCross-border concessionUK - EU connectivity
NEOM>$500 billion Detachmentsovereign fund + private equityCity/AI/Energy
Akkuyu NPP~$20–25 billionBOOthe Energy Bond
Istanbul Airport~$10–12 billionConcessionGlobal Aviation Hub
Noor Ouarzazate~$2.5 billionPPP + MFIsSolar Energy

Financial architecture of the megaproject

Equity of the initiator and strategic investors.

Project financing of the banking syndicate.

State guarantees, capital grants, availability payments.

Tariff revenues and concession payments.

Infrastructure bonds, CFA, pension and insurance funds.

Export credit and international financial institutions.

Life Cycle: From Idea to Operation

The Strategic Hypothesis

Pre-TEO

Consortium

Feasibility study +

Legal model

Financial closure

Design

Construction

Operation

Expansion/export

Why megaprojects fail

Inflated demand: traffic, cargo traffic, exports, solvency.

Underestimation CAPEX: inflation, geology, design changes, imports.

Expensive Debt: Rising rates are destroying the economy of a long project.

Poor management and blurred responsibility.

Policy cycle and re-prioritization.

Technological dependence.

Building without a full life cycle model.

The Russian model: not an object, but an industrial contour

Resource → energy → material → Component → Product → Logistics → Domestic market → Exports.

The main task is the maximum depth of processing and localization of the value chain within the country.

Megaproject should simultaneously solve technological, territorial, personnel and financial tasks.

Priority megaprojects of Russia

Arctic industrial and logistics contour.

New car industry and transport engineering.

High purity materials and deep processing of raw materials.

New energy and distributed generation.

Microelectronics, Power Electronics and Industrial AI.

Water and environmental infrastructure.

MTC "North - South".

New industrial cities and production agglomerations.

Unified IAC of industrial megaprojects

A single passport for each project.

Matrix of industries, territories, technologies and participants.

Rating of economic and technological significance.

Digital twin CAPEX/OPEX, timing and critical path.

Monitoring of state obligations and debt burden.

Registry of suppliers and localization.

Early warning on cost, timing and demand.

Public and closed reporting.

Passport megaproject: what should be fixed

Objective • Territory • Initiator • Public Partner • SPV/operator.

CAPEX/OPEX • Sources of funding • construction and operation time.

Process Core • suppliers • localization • power.

Demand and off-take • Exports • KPI • Risks.

Social and environmental impact • transfer/extension/exit scenario.

Main conclusion

The industrial megaproject is a new unit of strategic development. The result should not be an object, but a formed economic system.

For Russia, the portfolio of such projects can become a practical mechanism for new industrialization, spatial development and technological sovereignty.

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

VALIDATION MAP

Source Status: Primary Document

Unified system of checking ideas, projects, technologies, resources and solutions

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/karta-validatsii-equilibrium-canonical

Open on the site

Version 1.0 • 22 August 2026

1. Summary

The validation map is a single decision-making mechanism in the EQUILIBRIUM system. It transforms a subjective assessment of a “good idea/bad idea” into a consistent procedure based on criteria, evidence, scoring, expert judgment, and measurable outcome.

  • Object of validation: idea, project, technology, product, participant, organization, financial instrument, environmental solution, program or other element of the system.
  • Result: decision on admission, refinement, piloting, scaling or deviation.
  • Base: 13 Fundamental principles × 20 Verification Directions = 260 Test Cells.
  • Scale: Each cell is rated from 0 to 3 points; maximum - 780 points.
  • The key principle: it is not the declaration that is validated, but the proven ability to create a positive social, environmental, technological and economic result.

2. Three layers of validation

Layer I. Value-sense

Checks why a solution exists, whom it serves, whether it disrupts the balance and whether it conforms to the basic architecture of EQUILIBRIUM.

Layer II. Probative-project

Verifies the facts: problem, technology, law, economics, team, risk, resources, metrics, evidence and feasibility.

Layer III. Effective

Verifies the actual effect of the pilot, the sustainability of the result, repeatability, scalability and long-term legacy.

3. Thirteen reasons

BasisContents
1. MeaningClarity of mission, public need and reasons for the existence of a solution.
2. UsePractical value and measurable positive effect.
3. ManRespect for human dignity, security, opportunity and development.
4. SocietyContribution to community sustainability, solidarity and the public good.
5. NaturePreservation and restoration of natural balance, biocenoses and resources.
6. FairnessNon-discriminatory access, reasonable distribution of benefits and risks.
7. CooperationAbility to unite participants and form mutually beneficial ties.
8. CreationProducing new value instead of carrying or masking damage.
9. ResponsibilityThe presence of the owner of the result, obligations and correction mechanisms.
10. TransparencyVerifiability of data, decisions, financial flows and methodologies.
11. SustainabilityViability over time, resource and institutional sustainability.
12. DevelopmentAbility to improve quality, competence, technological level and scale of effect.
13. HarmonyHarmonization of the interests of man, society, economy, state and nature.

4. Twenty verification directions

1. Purpose. Is there a specific desired result and a criterion for achieving it?

2. Problem. Is the problem supported by data and is there a causal link?

3. User. Is the person directly using the solution determined?

4. Beneficiary. Is it clear who gets the final effect and in what form?

5. Resources. Are people, technology, data, infrastructure, and time enough?

6. Risks. Are key risks identified and management measures included?

7. Effect. Is the expected social, environmental and economic impact formulated?

8. Metrics. Is there a measurable KPI baseline and calculation method?

9. Ethics. Are the principles of good faith, dignity and non-injury respected?

10. Right. Does the decision comply with applicable law and regulatory requirements?

11. Economy. Is the project economy tested: costs, revenues, benefits, sustainability?

12. Technology. Are technical feasibility, maturity and safety confirmed?

13. Management. Are roles, powers, controls and responsibilities defined?

14. Communication. Is there a clear contour of interaction with participants and society?

15. Scaling. Is it possible to replicate the solution in another region, industry or scale?

16. Partners. Are the necessary partners and their contributions confirmed?

17. Funding. Is there a realistic funding model and sources of capital?

18. The social result. How do quality of life, employment, safety, accessibility and trust change?

19. Environmental result. How do emissions, resources, biodiversity, soils, water, air, and ecosystems change?

20. A long-term legacy. What will happen after the funding or the pilot is completed?

5. Matrix 13 × 20

Each object undergoes 260 checks: for each of 13 bases all 20 directions are considered. This allows us to see not only the overall attractiveness of the project, but also its “failures” — for example, a strong technology with a weak legal model or a high environmental effect in the absence of sustainable financing.

6. Scale of assessment

BallCell StatusInterpretation
0Does not matchThe criterion has not been met, there is no evidence or an unacceptable contradiction has been identified.
1Requires revisionThere is partial compliance, but the evidence or mechanisms are insufficient.
2ConformsThe criterion is met and supported by sufficient evidence.
3Strength SideThe criterion is not just fulfilled, but creates a significant advantage and can be a benchmark.

7. Final levels of admission

PointsLevelDecision
0–260The Red ZoneNot ready to launch. Concept reassembly or rejection is required.
261–520The Orange ZoneProspective, but requires significant revision and re-examination.
521–650The Yellow ZoneAllowed to a limited pilot if there is a risk management plan.
651–730The Green ZoneStrong project. Allowed to scale after confirmation of the pilot.
731–780Reference EQUILIBRIUMHigh level of evidence, maturity and systemic effect.

8. Critical Stop Factors

A high total score does not compensate for critical violations. An object cannot be validated if at least one stop factor is installed:

  • illegality of the key mechanism or impossibility of legal execution;
  • unacceptable risk to life, health or safety;
  • falsification of data, results or origin of assets;
  • absence of a real owner of responsibility;
  • significant environmental damage without compensatory or restorative mechanisms;
  • Unresolved conflict of interest that hides significant risks
  • inability to confirm the origin of key evidence;
  • An economic model based solely on the transfer of damage to third parties or future generations.

9. Hierarchy of evidence

Evaluation is assigned not by presentation, but by the strength of the evidence. Priority of evidence:

  • A. Primary confirmations: measurements, tests, registers, contracts, accounting data, protocols, technical journals.
  • B. Independent verification: accredited laboratory, audit, examination, certification, external validator.
  • C. Confirmed pilot: working object, operational statistics, user data and monitoring.
  • D. Comparable cases: proven results of similar decisions under comparable conditions.
  • E. Expert opinion: a qualified opinion with the disclosed methodology and assumptions.
  • F. Applicant’s declaration: used as background information, but is not sufficient evidence in itself.

10. Validation procedure

Step 1. Registration

The object receives the ID, owner, version and a brief passport.

Step 2. Prescreening

The basic completeness, conflict of interest, stop factors and applicability of criteria are checked.

Step 3. Documentary verification

A register of evidence for 260 cells is being formed.

Step 4. Expert assessment

Profile experts put out points and fix the grounds.

Step 5. Risk Committee

Critical risks are assessed separately from the average score.

Step 6. Pilot

If required, a limited test is carried out with pre-approved metrics.

Step 7. Verification of the result

Baseline, planned KPI and actual effect are compared.

Step 8. Decision

Issued status: accept / accept with conditions / pilot / reassembly / reject.

Step 9. Roster

The result is entered in the register of validated solutions EQUILIBRIUM.

Step 10. Revalidation

With significant changes, new data, or a set cycle, the object is retested.

11. Roles and responsibilities

RoleResponsibility
ApplicantProvides data, evidence, discloses risks and is responsible for the reliability of the original information.
Validation CoordinatorOrganizes the procedure, completeness and routing by experts.
Profile expertEvaluates the subject area and fixes a reasoned conclusion.
Independent ValidatorConfirms the critical indicators and the absence of significant distortions.
Risk CommitteeConsiders stop factors, damage scenarios and admission conditions.
Validation BoardMakes the final decision on controversial, large and systemic objects.
Registry ownerProvides versioning, data security, decision history and revalidation.

12. Validation decision passport

Object ID
Name
Object type
Applicant / Owner
Date and version
Goal
Key beneficiaries
Total score / 780
Level of admission
Critical risks
Stop factors
Conditions of admission
Duration of detention
Date of revalidation
Responsible Validator
Decision of the Validation Board

13. Working Card 13 × 20

In the working version, each cell contains: a score of 0–3, a link to the proof, an expert comment and, if necessary, a corrective action.

Basis1234567891011121314151617181920Σ
Meaning
Use
Person
Society
Nature
Fairness
Cooperation
Creation
Responsibility
Transparency
Resilience
Development
Harmony

Number of directions: 1 Objective; 2 Problem; 3 User; 4 Beneficiary; 5 Resources; 6 Risks; 7 Effect; 8 Metrics; 9 Ethics; 10 Law; 11 Economy; 12 Technology; 13 Management; 14 Communication; 15 Scaling; 16 Partners; 17 Financing; 18 Social result; 19 Environmental result; 20 Long-term heritage.

14. Communication with architecture EQUILIBRIUM

The validation map should be used as a universal gateway between the initiative and system resources. It can be used in SFERA For the selection of initiatives, in ECO-PPA for evidence of environmental projects, in SPECZASHCHITA for the admission of performers and technologies, as well as EQUILIBRIUM as part of the unified register of decisions and monitoring of the result.

15. Principle of immutability

Neither the applicant’s credibility, nor the amount of investment, nor political or institutional significance should replace the evidence. The greater the scale and potential systemic effect of the solution, the higher the requirements for independent verification, data transparency and risk control.

16. Final solution standard

Validated is considered to be an object that simultaneously:

  • has no critical stop factors;
  • scored an adequate score for the appropriate level of admission;
  • has confirmed evidence on key criteria;
  • has a responsibility owner and an understandable management model;
  • demonstrates measurable results or has a correct piloting plan;
  • has a certain period of validity of imprisonment and a mechanism of revalidation.

Validation card EQUILIBRIUM

"From idea to proven result"

Other published edition: MAP VALIDATION Karta_validatsii_SK42_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

Unified system of checking ideas, projects, technologies, resources and solutions

13 × 20 = 260 Checks

From idea to proven result

Version 1.0 • 22 August 2026

Why you need a validation card

It turns subjective assessment into a manageable admission procedure.

Uniform criteria

The same logic of assessment for initiatives, technologies, participants and financial instruments.

Evidence

Points are awarded only if there are confirmations and traceable sources.

Risk management

Critical stop factors are checked separately and are not masked by an average score.

Scaling

Validated object gets clear route: revision → Pilot → Scaling.

Three layers of validation

III

Value-sense

Probative-project

Effective

Why does the solution exist? Whom does it serve? Does it upset the balance?

Law, economics, technology, team, resources, risks, metrics and feasibility.

Actual pilot effect, repeatability, stability and scalability.

Meaning

Evidence

Result

13 Valuation bases

Meaning

Use

Person

Society

Nature

Fairness

Cooperation

Creation

Responsibility

Transparency

Resilience

Development

Harmony

The bases set a value and system framework. Each of them is checked in all 20 directions.

20 Verification Directions

Goal

Economy

Issue addressed

Technology

User

Management

Beneficiary

Communication

Resources

Scaling

Risks

Partners

Effect

Financing

Metrics

Social result

Ethics

Environmental result

Right

Long-term heritage

Matrix 13 × 20

260 cells show not only the total score, but also the exact zones of strength and failure.

0–3 points

Proof

Expert's comment

corrective action

Evaluation scale and tolerance levels

Does not match

No evidence / criterion violated

Requires revision

There are partial grounds

Conforms

Criterion confirmed

Strength Side

High evidence and quality

0–260

261–520

521–650

651–730

731–780

Not ready

Refinement

Pilot

Strong project

Reference level

Stop factors: the score does not cancel the ban

Illegality of the key mechanism

Unacceptable risk to life, health or safety

STOP

STOP

Falsification of data or origin of assets

Absence of owner liability

STOP

STOP

Significant environmental damage without recovery

Unresolved conflict of interest

STOP

STOP

Inability to confirm the origin of evidence

Economy by transferring damage to third parties

STOP

STOP

Rule SC42: the presence of at least one confirmed stop factor blocks a positive conclusion until the cause is eliminated.

Hierarchy of evidence

Primary Confirmations

measurements, registers, contracts, journals

Independent verification

laboratory, audit, certification

Confirmed Pilot

Operational Statistics and Monitoring

Comparable cases

Similar solutions in comparable conditions

Expert opinion

methodology, assumptions, qualifications

Declaration of the applicant

Basic information, not enough by itself

Validation procedure SC42

Registration

Prescreening

Documents

Experts

Risk Committee

Pilot

Verification

Decision

Register

Revalidation

Location of the map in the system architecture

SFERA

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

EQUILIBRIUM

Selection of initiatives

Evidence of environmental projects

Admission of performers and technologies

unified register and monitoring of the result

SC42 - single access gateway

Initiative → check → evidence → solution → Pilot → Confirmed result → Scaling

When is an object considered valid?

TOTAL STANDARD

No critical stop factors

Sufficient score for admission level

Key evidence confirmed

There is a liability owner

The result or correct plan of the pilot is shown

Validity and revalidation

SC42

From idea to proven result

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

NATIONAL VALIDATION CENTRES

Source Status: Primary Document

Architecture of a national and international system: ESG‑IR • ECO‑PPA • sustainable impact.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/tsentry-dokazatelnoi-ustoichivosti-esg-ir

Open on the site

The concept of institutional infrastructure for validation, verification, evidentiary reporting and mutual recognition

DATA TraceabilityPROOF independent verificationTrust mutual recognition

Project for pilot testing and interagency discussion

Moscow / international circuit • 2026

Summary

The National Validation Center in the ESG-IR model is not "another certification body", but an institutional coordinator of evidence-based sustainability. Its task is to connect the national accreditation system, independent validation and verification bodies, digital registries, ESG reporting, climate and energy instruments and international mutual recognition.

Key distinction: state or recognized accreditation body confirms the competence of inspection organizations; independent bodies conduct validation and verification; the operator of the standard ESG-IR establishes rules, maintains registries and provides authorization for the program; the rating committee makes rating decisions. These functions should not be concentrated in a single structure.

LevelInstituteFunction
1National accreditation bodyFormally confirms the competence of conformity assessment bodies.
2National Center ESGManages standard, methodology, registries, authorization and international compatibility.
3Independent VVBValidate future statements and verify actual results.
4Rating contourCalculates and collegiately approves the ESG-IR rating.
5International mutual recognitionEnsures comparability of national systems and conclusions.

Target result: a national infrastructure in which each ESGThe indicator is related to the primary source, level of evidence, independent opinion and digital history; and ECO‑PPA becomes a special case of an evidence-based environmental contract.

Contents

1. Subject and designation of national validation centres

2. Normative and international framework

3. Division of roles: accreditation, validation, verification, registry and rating

4. Russian National Contour

5. International models of national quality infrastructure

6. Target Model of the National Center ESG

7. Governance and independence

8. Accreditation and authorization of bodies

9. Qualification of experts

10. Digital infrastructure and registries

11. Special contour ECO‑PPA

12. International system of mutual recognition

13. Financial and organizational model

14. Roadmap for launch

15. Performance indicators

16. Risks and protective mechanisms

17. The Institutional Outcome Model

Annexes

1. Subject and designation of national validation centres

The National Validation Center is a working institutional concept that designates a national coordination unit that provides uniform rules for verifying sustainable development and links the state quality infrastructure with independent professional assessment.

The center should solve five tasks:

1. provide a single language of indicators and methods;

2. form a trusted network of independent validators and verifiers;

3. ensure digital traceability of data and conclusions;

4. prevent conflicts of interest, greenwashing and double counting;

5. establish a mechanism for national and cross-border recognition of results.

The Centre shall not substitute:

  • state accreditation body;
  • environmental supervision;
  • audit of financial statements;
  • credit rating agency;
  • the carbon unit register;
  • Issuer of energy origin certificates;
  • independent verifier.

2. Normative and international framework

The architecture is built around the international infrastructure of conformity assessment. ISO/IEC 17029:2019 establishes general requirements for competence, consistent work and impartiality of validation and verification bodies. ISO 14065:2020 specifies the requirements for environmental information, ISO 14066:2023 — Competence of the team, and ISO 14019‑4:2026 — Requirements for bodies validating and verifying the declared information on sustainability.

DocumentRole in the system ESG
ISO/IEC 17029:2019Basic requirements for validation and verification bodies.
ISO 14065:2020Industrial application to environmental information.
ISO 14066:2023Competence of teams, technical experts and independent reviewers.
ISO 14019‑1:2026General principles and requirements for validation/verification of sustainability information.
ISO 14019‑4:2026Requirements for competence, impartiality and activities of the bodies of verification of information on sustainability.
ISO 14064‑3Checking greenhouse gas declarations.
ISSA 5000International Framework for Sustainability Information.
IAF MLAMechanism for international recognition of accreditations in relevant fields.

The practical principle is that ESG-IR should be a program compatible with this infrastructure, and not parallel to a closed system.

3. Division of roles

RoleWhich confirmsWhich does not confirm
Accredited bodyCompetence of the conformity assessment body in the declared area.Does not confirm the specific customer result ESG.
ValidatorThe validity of the future statement, project, goal, baseline scenario.It does not confirm the fact of future achievement.
VerifierReliability of historical information and actual results.Does not automatically assign ESG-rating.
RegisterThe fact of recording, status, transfer or redemption within its function.It does not confirm all the characteristics of the project.
Rating CommitteeFinal ESG-IR class according to the approved method.It does not replace independent verification.
Standard OperatorRules, methodology, authorization, digital infrastructure.You don’t have to check your projects.

The basic chain of trust

National accreditation body → Accredited VVB → Verified data and conclusion → Digital Registry → the Rating Committee → user result.

4. Russian National Contour

In the Russian Federation, the official accreditation outline should be maintained by the national accreditation system. For environmental and climate statements, the existing mechanism for the accreditation of greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies is important. ESG-IR should connect to it within the applicable field, and for broader sustainability statements, develop programmatic authorization and seek to expand the official accreditation contour as regulatory practices develop.

Recommended Russian architecture

ContourProposed role
RosAccreditation / National Accreditation SystemOfficial accreditation of bodies in the areas provided for by law and schemes.
National Center ESGThe owner of the standard, methodological and registry operator, software authorization.
Accredited validation/verification bodiesIndependent verification ESGClimate, ir and ECO‑PPA within the competence.
Register of Carbon UnitsAccounting for climate projects and carbon units within the established legal regime.
Energy registers/attribute systemsConfirmation of the origin and redemption of energy attributes.
Rating Committee ESGSeparate collegial rating decision.

Legal disclaimer: the program "authorization ESG-IR" should not be referred to as state accreditation if it is issued by the owner of the standard, and not by the competent accreditation body.

5. International models of national quality infrastructure

In most developed systems, the national level is built not around a single “center that checks everything”, but around a national accreditation body and a network of independent conformity assessment bodies. For example, DAkkS is the national accreditation body of Germany and separately provides for the accreditation of validation and verification bodies on ISO/IEC 17029.

LevelType of InstituteModel for ESG-IR
NationalAccreditation bodyConfirms the competence of the independent VVB.
SoftwareOwner of the standard / scheme ownerEstablishes additional rules for the program ESG-IR.
ExecutiveValidation/Verification BodyConducts independent tasks.
RosterNational/industry registrationStores statuses, attributes, and transaction history.
InternationalIAF / international programsSupports equivalence and mutual recognition.

For climate projects, an additional international contour is created UNFCCC Article 6.4, Verra VCS and Gold Standard. They use independent DOE/VVB and its own program requirements. For ESG>IR is an important model: an international program sets the rules, but the project is checked by an independent competent organization.

6. Target Model of the National Center ESG

The National Center ESG-IR is proposed to be created as a standard owner and operator of trusted infrastructure, and not as a monopoly verifier.

Functional blockContents
StandardizationESG-IR 1.0, rating methodology, register of indicators, industry applications.
Validation/verificationProgram rules, qualification requirements, authorization of independent bodies.
Digital RegistryBodies, experts, opinions, ratings, ECO-PPA, status history.
QualificationTraining, exams, observation of practice, confirmation of competence.
RatingIndependent analytical function and collegial rating committee.
International contourCompliance tables, peer review, mutual recognition agreements.
ResearchMethodological studies, industry benchmarks, system quality assessment.

Recommended name:

National Center for Evidence-Based Sustainability, Validation and ESG-IR (working international name: National ESG-IR Validation & Evidence Centre).

7. Governance and independence

OrganMain FunctionKey limitation
Supervisory BoardStrategy, independence, public control.Does not change the rating of an individual organization.
The Standard CouncilApproves the standard and methodology.They do not verify their own projects.
Scientific and Methodological CommitteeDevelops indicators, formulas and industry modules.It does not make commercial rating decisions.
Ethics CommitteeConflicts of interest, impartiality, disciplinary issues.independent of the commercial block.
Rating CommitteeAdopts ESG-IR decisions.Not involved in the preparation of customer data.
The Appeals CommissionIt deals with procedural and methodological disputes.It does not consist of participants in the original decision.
Digital Registry CommitteeData, versions, information security.Doesn't change the history of records without a trace.

8. Accreditation and authorization of bodies

The system should use a two-tier recognition model.

Level A - official accreditation

Conducted by a national accreditation body or other competent authority in accordance with applicable law and international standards.

Level B — authorization ESG

It is provided by the program owner and confirms knowledge of the standard ESG-IR, connection to the digital registry, compliance with the rules of the program and the presence of appropriate competence.

StageContents
1. ApplicationLegal status, area, personnel, procedures, independence.
2. Documentary evaluationISO/IEC 17029, Applicable ISO 14065/14019, procedures ESG‑IR.
3. Evaluation of the systemManagement, conflicts, data, archive, complaints.
4. Witness assessmentMonitoring a real or pilot task.
5. DecisionIndependent of the assessment team.
6. RosterPublic area, terms, restrictions, status.
7. OversightAnnual monitoring and re-evaluation.

9. Qualification of experts

RoleMinimum functionSpecial competence
ValidatorEvaluation of future statements and prerequisites.Basic scenario, additionality, forecasts, goals.
VerifierChecking historical data.Sampling, recalculation, proof, data control.
Task ManagerResponsibility for the conclusion.Risks, materiality, command, file quality.
Technical expertIndustry expertise.Energy, climate, water, biodiversity, etc.
Data ExpertDigital Systems and Algorithms.IT-controls, journaling, models, cyber risks.
Expert on EffectsImpact assessment.Attribution, additionality, leakage, reversible.
Independent reviewerControl of key judgments.Competence is not lower than the head of the task.

Qualification is fixed by matrix: role + Type of task + block ESG‑IR + Industry + Level of confidence + Type of object. The mere fact of passing the general course does not give the right to check any industry.

10. Digital infrastructure and registries

The digital circuit is part of the evidence architecture, not just the public catalog.

RegisterKey fields
Organs VVBStatus, accreditation, authorization, scope, limitations, history.
ExpertsRole, qualification, industry, duration, disciplinary status.
ConclusionsObject, period, criteria, level of confidence, conclusion, reservations.
RatingsE/S/G/I/R/D/T, final class, forecast, version of the methodology.
ECO‑PPAGeneration object, MW·h, period, attributes, redemption, MRV.
WarningsSuspensions, reviews, falsification, double counting.
TechniquesVersions, dates of action, transition periods, interpretations.

The key principle of the registry is the immutability of history: the fix creates a new version of the record, but does not destroy the previous one.

11. Special contour ECO‑PPA

ECO-PPA should be the first transactional zone of the national center: energy, contract, instrument data, environmental attributes, climate calculation, digital passport and independent verification are simultaneously present here.

Object of verificationWho confirms
The fact of generation and deliveryCommercial accounting / measurement operator + VVB.
Origin of EnergyAuthorized certificate/attribute system.
Transfer and redemption of attributeRegister of energy attributes.
Scope 2Independent calculation according to the applicable method.
Prevented emissionsSeparate project methodology and verification.
ComplementaryValidation of the project and financial model.
Carbon UnitsOnly under a separate climate program/registry.
Social and natural effectESG‑IR Impact + Relevant technical experts.

The certificate of origin, market-based Scope 2, avoided emissions and carbon unit are different results and are taken into account separately.

12. International system of mutual recognition

The international contour ESG-IR should be built as a system of equivalence of national mechanisms, and not as a supranational body that abolishes national law.

LevelSubject of recognitionResult
MR‑1MethodologyComparability of standards and definitions is confirmed.
MR‑2OrgansComparable requirements for VVB and supervision are recognized.
MR‑3ConclusionsIt is allowed to accept conclusions without a full re-examination.
MR‑4RatingsA general scale or transformation table is used.
MR‑5Digital integrationRegistries check statuses and double counting automatically.

International climate programs — UNFCCC, Verra, Gold Standard - can act not as competitors, but as external software contours. ESG>IR should be able to refer to their results within the limits of the actually confirmed statements.

13. Financial and organizational model

The center must have diversified funding so that no major rated participant can influence the methodology or decisions.

SourcePermissible designationProtective mechanism
Constituent contributionsLaunching infrastructure.There is no right to interfere with individual ratings.
Authorization and registriesOperational support.Fixed tariffs do not depend on the result.
Training and examsQualification outline.Separation of training and examination decision.
Grants and researchMethodology and international development.Donor Disclosure and Conflict.
State supportsocially significant infrastructure.Authority is determined separately.
Analytical servicesIndustry research.Prohibition of consultation and verification of one object by one command.

14. Roadmap for launch

PeriodStageKey result
0–3 monthsInstitutionJurica, Board of Standards, Ethics Committee, version 1.0 documents.
3–6 monthsQualification10+ Experts, 2 Candidate Authority, Digital Registry MVP.
6–12 monthsPilot3–5 checks, minimum 1 ECO-PPA, first ratings marked "pilot".
12–15 monthsCalibrationError analysis, version 1.1, industry coefficients.
15–24 monthsInternational PilotPeer review, 2–3 national partner, MRQQ1/MRQQ2.
24+ monthsScalingMR‑3/MR‑4, industry centers, cross-border ECO‑PPA.

15. Performance indicators

KPIPilot targetValue
Qualified experts≥ 10Establishment of a minimum independent human resources pool.
Authorized bodies≥ 2Competition and lack of monopoly.
Pilot facilities3–5Testing the methodology for different types of objects.
ECO‑PPA≥ 1 paid transactionProof of Product through a real transaction.
Share D4-D5 in critical KPI≥ 80%Increased evidence of key claims.
Appeals due to procedural errors< 5%Quality control of decisions.
Completeness of digital history100%Traceability of changes and statuses.

16. Risks and protective mechanisms

RiskConsequenceProtection
Conflict of interestDistrust of conclusions.Organizational division of functions, register of conflicts, independent review.
Substitution of accreditation by authorizationLegal and reputational risk.Clear terminology and public disclosure of status.
GreenwashingHigh rating with a weak result.Levels D, critical limiters, fact above policy.
Double countingRe-monetization of one effect.Unique ID, registry verification, attribution rules.
Closed methodologyInability to check the rating.Public weights, scales and limiters.
MonopolizationThe market depends on one inspector.Multiple VVB and open tolerance by single criteria.
Technological opacityMistakes of digital models.Versionality, algorithm auditing, human control.

17. The Institutional Outcome Model

The national validation system ESG-IR should consist of independent but interrelated levels:

1. State/official accreditation of competence;

2. program owner and National Center ESG-IR;

3. competitive network of independent validation and verification bodies;

4. professional register of qualified experts;

5. digital passports and a register of opinions;

6. independent rating contour;

7. Appellate and ethical control;

8. international mutual recognition.

Formula of the system

DATA → PROOF → VERIFICATION → REGISTER → RATING → FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT SOLUTION

Central Principle: The National Center creates trust not through administrative monopoly, but through transparent rules, independent verification, professional competence and traceable digital history.

Annex 1. Minimum National Center Card

FieldContents
Legal name
Country / jurisdiction
Owner of standard
Official accreditation body
Version ESG
Authorized VVB
Roster of experts
The Register of Conclusions
Rating Committee
The Appeals Commission
International status
Level MR

Annex 2. Minimum package of documents to run

  1. Standard ESG‑IR 1.0.
  2. Method of rating calculation ESG‑IR 1.0.
  3. Register of indicators ESG - IR 1.0.
  4. Validation and verification method ESG-IR 1.0.
  5. Accreditation/authorization of bodies and qualification of experts.
  6. Regulation on the National Centre ESG-IR and international mutual recognition.
  7. Code of ethics and impartiality.
  8. Regulation of the Digital Register.
  9. Special module ECO-PPA.
  10. Rating Committee Regulations and Appeals.

Annex 3. Normative and institutional orientations

SourceUse in concept
ISO/IEC 17029:2019General principles and requirements for validation and verification bodies.
ISO 14065:2020Authorities that check environmental information.
ISO 14066:2023Competence of teams and independent reviewers.
ISO 14019‑1:2026General requirements for verification of sustainability information.
ISO 14019‑4:2026Requirements for bodies to verify information on sustainability.
RosAccreditationNational official accreditation outline in Russia.
DAkkSExample of a national accreditation body V/V on ISO/IEC 17029.
IAFInternational recognition of accreditations.
UNFCCC Article 6.4International Accreditation/Recognition Model DOE for Climate Mechanisms.
Verra VCS / Gold StandardSoftware models VVB and independent verification of climate projects.

Relevance note

Regulatory and program requirements are changing. Prior to the legal launch of the National Center, a current legal expertise of a specific jurisdiction is required, verification of the current areas of accreditation and comparison of version ESG-IR with applicable national rules.

Sources and official guidelines

  • ISO — ISO/IEC 17029:2019, Conformity assessment — General principles and requirements for validation and verification bodies (iso.org).
  • ISO — ISO 14065:2020, General principles and requirements for bodies validating and verifying environmental information (iso.org).
  • ISO — ISO 14066:2023, Environmental information — Competence requirements for teams validating and verifying environmental information (iso.org).
  • ISO — ISO 14019‑1:2026 and ISO 14019‑4:2026, Sustainability information (iso.org).
  • Federal Accreditation Service - materials on greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies (fsa.gov.ru).
  • DAkkS — Validation and verification bodies / DIN EN ISO/IEC 17029; Official website of the German national accreditation body (dakks.de).
  • International Accreditation Forum - documents MLA and accreditation requirements of V/V bodies (iaf.nu).
  • UNFCCC — Article 6.4 mechanism: accreditation of Designated Operational Entities (unfccc.int).
  • Verra — Validation/Verification Bodies under the Verified Carbon Standard (verra.org).
  • Gold Standard — Validation and Verification Standard and VVB requirements (globalgoals.goldstandard.org).

Source reference update date: 22 August 2026.

Other published edition: NATIONAL CENTERS OF VALIDATION National_centers_validation_ESG-IR_ECO-PPA.pptx · Web Text +

Architecture of a national and international system: ESG‑IR • ECO‑PPA • sustainable impact.

Data

Verification

The concept of institutional infrastructure for validation, verification, evidentiary reporting and mutual recognition

Register

PROJECT 1.0

2026

Trust

From data to evidence. From evidence to trust.

1. Why a National Validation System is Needed

ESG - Reporting and environmental contracts become trusted only when data is shared, verified and recognized.

DATA

PROOF

TRUST

Primary Sources

instruments and ERP

Unified Register of Indicators

digital passport

independent verification

Validation of future applications

verification of actual data

Levels D0-D5

rating decision

public status

Mutual recognition

Investor / State / Buyer

Key principle: the operator of the standard should not confirm the environmental impact of its own projects.

2. Five-tier architecture of trust

Each level is responsible for a separate function and controls the previous one.

officially confirms the competence of conformity assessment bodies

National accreditation body

standard, methodology, authorization, registries, international compatibility

National Center ESG

validation of future statements and verification of actual results

Independent VVB

calculation and collegial approval ESG-IR rating

Rating contour

comparability of national systems and cross-border confidence

Mutual recognition

Not a “one-stop-shop” but a system of independent institutions with clear boundaries.

3. Division of roles

The main protection against conflicts of interest is the inability to combine standardization, verification, rating and appeal in one hand.

ACCREDITATION

STANDARD

VALIDATION

Competence of bodies

and the scope of their powers

Rules, metrics,

Methodology, Versions

Future statements, objectives,

scenarios, additionality

VERIFICATION

REGISTER

RATING

Actual data,

Results and reporting

Uniqueness, history,

Statuses and Digital Passports

Collegiate decision

Based on confirmed data

Software authorization ESG‑IR ≠ State accreditation. These statuses must be named and accounted for separately.

4. Russian National Contour

ESG -IR should connect to the existing national quality infrastructure rather than create a parallel "quasi-state" system.

Official outline

Program outline ESG-IR

Independent market verification

National accreditation system

• official accreditation VVB

• area of competence

• Supervision and inspection

• Application ISO/IEC 17029 and industry requirements

National Center ESG

• Standard Owner

• register of indicators

• program authorization

• Qualification of experts

• digital registers

• International Compatibility

Validation and verification bodies

• Verification ESG

• climate statements

• projects and impacts

• ECO‑PPA

• conclusions limited / reasonable assurance

The goal is to combine state recognition of competence with program specialization ESG-IR.

5. International Logic

International systems share quality infrastructure, program rules, and independent verification.

ISO / IAF

ISSB / GRI / ESRS

General infrastructure for accreditation and recognition

disclosure and materiality contours

UNFCCC Article 6.4

Verra / Gold Standard

international climate mechanism and DOE

program rules and independent VVB

Model for ESGThe program sets the rules → The Independent Auditing Authority → the Register of Records → Other jurisdictions recognize equivalence.

6. Target Model of the National Center ESG

The center is the owner of the standard and the operator of trusted infrastructure, but not a monopoly verifier.

STANDARD

REGISTERS

versions, methods,

Industry Modules

bodies, experts,

conclusions, ratings

NATIONAL

CENTER

ESG‑IR

QUALIFICATION

RECIPROCAL RECOGNITION

experts, exams,

Competency Matrix

national systems,

Transboundary rules

AUTHORIZATION ESG

access to the program while maintaining official accreditation separately

7. Governance and independence

The system should be designed so that neither the founder, nor the commercial customer, nor the verifier can single-handedly change the result.

Supervisory Board

Strategic Control and Social Balance

The Standard Council

approval of methodology and versions

Ethics Committee

conflicts of interest and impartiality

Rating Committee

independent rating decision

The Appeals Commission

Review of procedural and methodological disputes

Digital Registry Committee

Data integrity, version and access

The rule: who prepares the data - does not verify them; who verifies - does not consider the appeal; who sells the service - does not change the methodology for the client.

8. Accreditation and authorization - two different statuses

Mixing these concepts creates legal and reputational risk.

Level A - official accreditation

LEVEL B — authorization ESG

Who gives:

• National accreditation body or other competent authority

Which confirms:

• Competence VVB

• field of activity

• management system and independence

• supervision

Legal Meaning:

official status within the accreditation area

Who gives:

• program owner ESG

Which confirms:

• knowledge of standard

• Qualification of personnel

• connection to the registry

• Compliance with program rules

Legal Meaning:

the right to carry out work under the program ESG-IR, but not state accreditation

Target model: formal accreditation + Software Authorization ESG‑IR.

9. Qualification of experts

Competence is not fixed by position, but by a combination of role, subject, industry and level of confidence.

Admission Matrix

VLD / VRF / LEAD / REV

ROLE

validation / verification / mixed

TASK

E / S / G / I / R / D / T

BLOCK

Energy / Industry / Finance / ...

INDUSTRY

limited / reasonable

CONFIDENCE

organization / project / ECO-PPA / portfolio

OBJECT

Example of admission: VRF–E/D–EN/RE–R–PPA — environmental data and evidence verifier with reasonable confidence for energy, renewable energy and ECO‑PPA.

10. Digital infrastructure and registries

The digital circuit is part of the proof: it must preserve the origin, status, and history of the change of each significant fact.

Conclusions

Ratings

type, period, level of confidence

score, D-class, forecast

Organs

area, status, supervision

DIGITAL

REGISTER

ESG‑IR

Experts

ECO‑PPA

role, industry, admission

energy, attributes, passport

Warnings

suspensions, reviews, double counting

Unchangeable history: the fix creates a new version of the record, but does not destroy the previous one.

11. ECO‑PPA — The first transactional application area

There is simultaneously a contract, energy, instrument data, environmental attributes, climate calculation and independent verification.

GENERATION

TRAINING

ATRIBUTES

MRV

PASSPORT

BUYER

RES facility

Meter / Data

Certificates of origin

calculation and verification

digital recording

Reporting / Payment

The four results are reported separately

1) certificate of origin of energy 2) market-based Scope 2 3) avoided emissions 4) carbon unit. You cannot automatically convert one result to another.

ECO-PPA - convenient Proof of Product: one real delivery + one digital passport + one independent withdrawal + one payment.

12. International system of mutual recognition

Recognition is based on levels - from comparability of methods to integrated digital exchange.

Integrated digital system

MR‑5

Comparability of ratings

MR‑4

Recognition of findings

MR‑3

Recognition of organs

MR‑2

Methodological comparability

MR‑1

Equivalence, not complete identity: National rules remain, but results become comparable.

13. Roadmap for launch

The realistic path from institutional project to international mutual recognition is 24 months.

0–3 months

3–6 months

6–12 months

12–15 months

15–24 months

24+ months

Institution

Qualification

Pilots

Version 1.1

Mutual recognition

Scaling

legal model, management bodies, documents 1.0

training of experts, examinations, selection of bodies

3–5 ratings, ECO-PPA, registry and rating test

error analysis, public discussion, adjustment

international partners, MR-1 / MR-2, joint pilots

industry programs, MR-3 / MR-4 / digital integration

The first Proof of Product should prove not a "beautiful concept", but a working chain: data → independent verification → registry → user solution.

14. KPI and protective mechanisms

The center should measure not the number of issued signs, but the quality of trusted infrastructure.

Key KPI

Main risks and protection

• Share of significant indicators D4-D5

• proportion of decisions without significant errors

• number of qualified experts

• share of registry records with full history

• Number of recognized national systems

• volume verified ECO-PPA

• Closing speed of corrective actions

• Percentage of appeals that identified procedural errors

Conflict of interest → separation of functions

Quasistate status → legal distinction of terms

Greenwashing → levels of evidence and independent assurance

Double counting → unique identifiers and registry checks

Capture methodology by industry → balanced committees

History change → versioning and journaling

15. The Institutional Outcome Model

The National Center creates rules and trust infrastructure; independent bodies create evidence; users make decisions.

STANDARD

ESG‑IR

NATIONAL

CENTER

INDEPENDENT

VVB

DIGITAL

REGISTER

RATING /

RECOGNITION

Rules are developed publicly, data is created by responsible organizations, results are checked independently, ratings are accepted collegially, history is stored in a protected registry.

Basic principle

National Validation Centers - Trust Infrastructure for ESG-IR, ECO-PPA and Evidence-Based Sustainable Development.

Published files

Methodology · Full published text

Human Development Standard SRCh 1.0

Source Status: Primary Document

19 Standards • 260 indicators • a unified system for assessing development conditions, opportunities and results

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/standart-razvitiya-cheloveka

Open on the site

Man is a subject of development. The quality of the environment and support is standardized, not the personality.

Editorial Board 1.0 | 18 August 2026

Passport document

ParameterContents
NameHuman Development Standard SRCh 1.0
StatusProject for interdepartmental, scientific, business and public discussion
SubjectConditions, opportunities and confirmed results of human development throughout life
Architecture19 Standards; 260 indicators; individual, territorial, organizational and programme levels
Key principleHuman dignity is not allowed. The availability of opportunities, the quality of the environment and the dynamics of well-being should be assessed.
ApplicationStrategic planning, social programmes, impact assessment, ECO-PPA, SFERA and EQUILIBRIUM

1. Purpose and scope

SRCh 1.0 provides a common language for designing and evaluating public policy, corporate programmes, civic initiatives and territorial development. Its task is to show whether an individual Person has real opportunities to live with dignity, be healthy, learn, work, create, participate in decision-making and pass the results on to future generations.

Main provisions

  • A person is a subject of development and a co-author of decisions affecting his life.
  • Dignity and basic rights are independent of scores, ratings, income, health status or social role.
  • Integral assessment cannot compensate for a critical failure in safety, rights, health or access to basic living conditions.
  • Personal data is used only legally, transparently, proportional to the purpose and with the possibility of human review of the decision.
  • Indicators are used to improve the environment and targeted support, but not for discrimination, punishment or restriction of rights.

2. Evaluation model

Each indicator is normalized on a scale of 0–100. For statistical indicators, approved thresholds are applied; for survey - validated scales; for administrative - verifiable events and deadlines. The value of the standard is calculated as a weighted average of its indicators with mandatory control of critical minimums.

HDI 2.0 = Σ (Standard weight × value of the standard), subject to critical minimums

PointsLevelInterpretation
0–39Critical areaBarriers and risks need to be addressed urgently.
40–59Basic securityThere are minimum conditions, but there are still significant restrictions.
60–74Sustainable developmentThe main features are available and give a confirmed result.
75–89High levelThe environment supports independence and creative implementation.
90–100Reference practiceThe result is sustainable, inclusive, replicable and validated by an independent evaluation.

3. Architecture 19 standards

CodeStandardPurpose
СРЧ-01Dignity and rightsProvides protection of the dignity, rights, freedoms and subjectivity of a person.
СРЧ-02Physical healthProvides health preservation, prevention, treatment and recovery.
СРЧ-03Psychological well-beingProvides mental stability, support and quality of inner life.
СРЧ-04SecurityProvides protection against physical, social, technological and digital threats.
СРЧ-05Healthy environmentProvides access to environmentally friendly living conditions.
СРЧ-06Family and childhoodIt ensures the well-being of the family, parenthood and the full development of the child.
СРЧ-07Lifelong educationProvides continuous development of knowledge, thinking and competencies.
СРЧ-08Culture and worldviewProvides cultural identity, ethical maturity and openness to diversity.
СРЧ-09Work and professional implementationProvides decent work, skill and professional self-realization.
СРЧ-10Economic independenceProvides sustainable income, financial literacy and resource management.
СРЧ-11Housing and living spaceProvides an affordable, safe and developing living space.
СРЧ-12Digital subjectivityProvides the rights, security, access and independence of the Human in the digital environment.
СРЧ-13Creativity and innovationProvides the ability to create, research and implement socially useful solutions.
СРЧ-14Social ties and solidarityProvides affiliation, trust, mutual assistance and participation in communities.
СРЧ-15Civic participationProvides informed participation in public life and decision-making.
СРЧ-16Environmental responsibilityEnsures responsible environmental management and ecosystem restoration.
СРЧ-17Time and life trajectory managementProvides a balance of roles, time, goals and transitions between life stages.
СРЧ-18Meaning and ServiceProvides meaningful life, value certainty and contribution to the common good.
СРЧ-19Legacy and continuityIt ensures the transfer of knowledge, culture, experience and results to the next generations.

4. Register 260 indicators

The register contains exactly 260 indicators. Standards СРЧ-01–СРЧ-13 have 14 indicators each, and СРЧ-14–СРЧ-19 have 13 each: 13 × 14 + 6 × 13 = 260.

СРЧ-01. Dignity and rights

The purpose of the standard is to ensure the protection of the dignity, rights, freedoms and subjectivity of a person.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
101.01Knowledge of your rightsThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "knowledge of their rights" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
201.02Access to legal aidThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “access to legal aid” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
301.03Protection against discriminationThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “protection against discrimination” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
401.04Freedom of expressionThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “freedom of expression” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
501.05Privacy PolicyThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "privacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
601.06Documented legal personalityThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "documented legal personality" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
701.07Access to justiceProportion of the target group for which the indicator "access to justice" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
801.08Procedural fairnessThe share of the target group for which the indicator "procedural fairness" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
901.09Freedom of associationThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “freedom of associations” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
1001.10Freedom of conscienceThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “freedom of conscience” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
1101.11Personal data protectionThe share of the target group for which the indicator "personal data protection" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
1201.12Participation in decisions about yourselfThe share of the target group for which the indicator "participation in decisions about themselves" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
1301.13Accessibility of environment and servicesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "accessibility of the environment and services" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
1401.14Recovery of violated rightsThe share of the target group for which the indicator of “recovery of violated rights” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-02. Physical health

The purpose of the standard is to ensure the preservation of health, prevention, treatment and recovery.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
1502.01Healthy life expectancyThe proportion of the target group for which the indicator “expected life expectancy” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
1602.02Access to primary careProportion of the target group for which the indicator of "accessibility of primary care" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
1702.03Coverage of preventive examinationsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "coverage by preventive examinations" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
1802.04Timeliness of diagnosisThe share of the target group for which the indicator "timeliness of diagnosis" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
1902.05Control of chronic diseasesThe share of the target group for which the indicator "control of chronic diseases" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
2002.06Physical activityProportion of the target group for which the indicator of "physical activity" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
2102.07Quality of foodThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "quality of food" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
2202.08Quality of sleepThe proportion of the target group for which the indicator of "sleep quality" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
2302.09Reproductive healthThe proportion of the target group for which the indicator of "reproductive health" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
2402.10Dental healthThe share of the target group for which the indicator "dental health" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
2502.11Access to medicinesThe share of the target group for which the indicator "access to medicines" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
2602.12Rehabilitation after injuries and diseasesThe share of the target group for which the indicator "rehabilitation after injuries and diseases" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
2702.13Self-assessment of physical healthThe share of the target group for which the indicator of “self-assessment of physical health” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
2802.14Preventable mortalityProportion of the target group for which the indicator of “preventable mortality” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.

СРЧ-03. Psychological well-being

The purpose of the standard is to provide mental stability, support and quality of internal life.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
2903.01Emotional stabilityThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "emotional stability" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
3003.02Satisfaction with lifeThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "life satisfaction" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
3103.03Access to psychological assistanceThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "access to psychological assistance" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
3203.04Timely crisis supportThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "timely crisis support" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
3303.05Level of chronic stressThe proportion of the target group for which the indicator of "chronic stress level" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
3403.06Self-regulation skillsThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "self-regulation skills" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
3503.07Prevention of addictionsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of “dependency prevention” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
3603.08Protection against violence and traumaThe share of the target group for which the indicator “protection against violence and trauma” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
3703.09Social and emotional skillsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "social and emotional skills" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
3803.10A sense of personal effectivenessThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "sense of personal effectiveness" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
3903.11Load and recovery balanceThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “balance of load and recovery” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
4003.12Psychological safety of the environmentThe share of the target group for which the indicator "psychological safety of the environment" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
4103.13Absence of discriminatory stigmaThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “no discriminatory stigma” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
4203.14Recovery from the crisisThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “recovery after the crisis” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.

СРЧ-04. Safety

The purpose of the standard is to ensure protection from physical, social, man-made and digital threats.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
4304.01Personal physical safetyThe share of the target group for which the indicator "personal physical safety" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
4404.02Home securityThe share of the target group for which the indicator "home security" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
4504.03Safety of public spacesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "safety of public spaces" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
4604.04Occupational safetyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "safety of labor" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
4704.05Road safetyThe share of the target group for which the indicator "road safety" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
4804.06Fire safetyThe share of the target group for which the indicator "fire safety" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
4904.07Preparedness for emergenciesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of “emergency preparedness” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
5004.08Information securityThe share of the target group for which the indicator "information security" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
5104.09Protection against fraudProportion of the target group for which the indicator “protection against fraud” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
5204.10Protection against domestic violenceThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "protection against domestic violence" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
5304.11Child safetyProportion of the target group for which the indicator “child safety” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
5404.12Availability of emergency assistanceThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "availability of emergency assistance" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
5504.13Trust in Protection ServicesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "trust in the protection services" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
5604.14Recovery after incidentsThe share of the target group for which the indicator “recovery after incidents” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-05. Healthy environment

The purpose of the standard is to provide access to environmentally friendly living conditions.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
5705.01Drinking water qualityThe share of the target group for which the indicator "quality of drinking water" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
5805.02Air qualityThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "quality of atmospheric air" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
5905.03Food safetyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "food safety" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
6005.04Sanitary condition of the territoryThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "sanitary condition of the territory" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
6105.05Noise levelThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "noise level" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
6205.06Access to green areasThe share of the target group for which the indicator "access to green zones" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
6305.07Soil safetyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "soil safety" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
6405.08Waste managementThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “waste management” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
6505.09Climatic comfort of housingThe share of the target group for which the indicator "climate comfort of housing" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
6605.10Environmental safety of productionThe share of the target group for which the indicator "environmental safety of production" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
6705.11Access to environmental informationThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "access to environmental information" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
6805.12Protection from climate risksThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “protection against climate risks” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
6905.13Biodiversity of the living environmentThe share of the target group for which the indicator "biodiversity of the living environment" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
7005.14Participation of residents in improving the environmentThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “involvement of residents in improving the environment” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-06. Family and childhood

The purpose of the standard is to ensure the well-being of the family, parenthood and the full development of the child.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
7106.01Material sustainability of the familyThe share of the target group for which the indicator "material stability of the family" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
7206.02Accessibility of preschool developmentThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "accessibility of preschool development" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
7306.03Maternal and child healthThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "mother and child health" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
7406.04Responsible ParenthoodThe share of the target group for which the indicator "responsible parenthood" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
7506.05Child safetyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "child safety" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
7606.06Quality of family relationsThe share of the target group for which the indicator "quality of family relations" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
7706.07Family time togetherThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “shared family time” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
7806.08Support for families in crisisThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “support of families in crisis” or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
7906.09Accessibility of child careThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "accessibility of child care" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
8006.10Inclusion of children with special needsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “inclusion of children with special needs” or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
8106.11Participation of the child in decisionsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "child participation in decisions" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
8206.12Protection from family violenceThe share of the target group for which the indicator “protection against domestic violence” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
8306.13Preparation for independent lifeThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “preparation for independent life” or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
8406.14Intergenerational linksThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "intergenerational relations" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-07. Lifelong learning

The purpose of the standard is to ensure the continuous development of knowledge, thinking and competencies.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
8507.01Functional literacyThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "functional literacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
8607.02Mathematical literacyThe share of the target group for which the indicator "mathematical literacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
8707.03Natural and scientific literacyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "natural and scientific literacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
8807.04Digital literacyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "digital literacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
8907.05Critical ThinkingThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “critical thinking” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
9007.06Communication skillsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "communication skills" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
9107.07Accessibility of educationThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "accessibility of education" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
9207.08Individual educational trajectoryThe share of the target group for which the indicator "individual educational trajectory" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
9307.09Recognition of non-formal learningThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “recognition of non-formal learning” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
9407.10Vocational retrainingThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "professional retraining" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
9507.11Civic literacyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "civil literacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
9607.12Financial literacyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "financial literacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
9707.13Environmental literacyThe share of the target group for which the indicator "environmental literacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
9807.14Ability to learn independentlyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "ability to learn independently" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-08. Culture and worldview

The purpose of the standard is to ensure cultural identity, ethical maturity and openness to diversity.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
9908.01Knowledge of native cultureThe share of the target group for which the indicator "knowledge of native culture" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
10008.02Access to cultural goodsProportion of the target group for which the indicator of "access to cultural goods" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
10108.03Participation in cultural lifeThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "participation in cultural life" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
10208.04Intercultural dialogueThe share of the target group for which the indicator "intercultural dialogue" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
10308.05Ethical literacyThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "ethical literacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
10408.06Freedom of worldviewThe share of the target group for which the indicator “freedom of outlook” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
10508.07Media literacyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "media literacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
10608.08Historical literacyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "historical literacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
10708.09Preservation of mother tongueThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "preserving the native language" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
10808.10Creative self-expressionThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "creative expression" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
10908.11Respect for cultural diversityThe proportion of the target group for which the indicator "respect for cultural diversity" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
11008.12Culture of communicationThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "culture of communication" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
11108.13Critical Understanding of InformationThe share of the target group for which the indicator “critical comprehension of information” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
11208.14Link between culture and everyday lifeThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "linkage of culture and everyday life" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-09. Work and professional fulfilment

The purpose of the standard is to provide decent work, skill and professional self-realization.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
11309.01Access to decent workThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "access to decent work" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
11409.02Workplace safetyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "workplace safety" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
11509.03Fair payThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "fair wages" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
11609.04Stability of employmentThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "employment stability" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
11709.05Conformity of work qualificationThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "compliance with labor qualification" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
11809.06Professional developmentThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "professional development" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
11909.07Autonomy at workThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "autonomy in work" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
12009.08Work-life balanceThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "balance of work and life" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
12109.09Protection of labour rightsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “protection of labor rights” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
12209.10Employee participation in managementThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "employee participation in management" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
12309.11Recognition of professional contributionThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "recognition of professional contribution" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
12409.12Entrepreneurial initiativeThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "entrepreneurial initiative" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
12509.13Labour productivityThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "labor productivity" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
12609.14Public utility of workThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "public utility of labor" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.

СРЧ-10. Economic independence

The purpose of the standard is to provide sustainable income, financial literacy and resource management.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
12710.01Sufficiency of disposable incomeThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "sufficiency of disposable income" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
12810.02Income stabilityThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "income stability" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
12910.03Availability of financial reserveThe share of the target group for which the indicator "availability of financial reserve" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
13010.04Debt managementThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "debt load management" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
13110.05Access to basic financial servicesThe share of the target group for which the indicator "access to basic financial services" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
13210.06Protection against financial fraudThe share of the target group for which the indicator “protection against financial fraud” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
13310.07Personal budgeting skillsThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "personal budgeting skills" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
13410.08Long-term savingsThe share of the target group for which the indicator "long-term savings" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
13510.09Access to development investmentThe share of the target group for which the indicator “access to development investments” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
13610.10Insurance securityThe share of the target group for which the indicator "insurance protection" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
13710.11Economic sustainability of householdsThe share of the target group for which the indicator "economic stability of the household" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
13810.12Diversification of income sourcesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "diversification of sources of income" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
13910.13Possession of productive assetsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “ownership of productive assets” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
14010.14Ability to overcome financial shockThe share of the target group for which the indicator “ability to overcome financial shock” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.

СРЧ-11. Housing and living space

The purpose of the standard is to provide an accessible, safe and developing living space.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
14111.01Housing affordabilityProportion of the target group for which the indicator "availability of housing" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
14211.02Legal protection of residenceThe share of the target group for which the indicator "legal protection of residence" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
14311.03Physical security of housingThe share of the target group for which the indicator "physical safety of housing" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
14411.04Provision of public servicesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “municipal services provision” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
14511.05Energy efficiency of housingThe share of the target group for which the indicator "energy efficiency of housing" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
14611.06Accessibility of transportThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "availability of transport" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
14711.07Barrier-free spaceThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "barrier-free space" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
14811.08Sufficient personal spaceThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "personal space adequacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
14911.09Access to social infrastructureThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “access to social infrastructure” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
15011.10Quality of the yard environmentThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "quality of the yard environment" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
15111.11Coherence of territoryThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "connectivity of the territory" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
15211.12Sustainability of housing costsThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "sustainability of housing costs" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
15311.13Possibility of improving housing conditionsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “possibility of improving housing conditions” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
15411.14Participation of residents in the management of the houseThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "participation of residents in the management of the house" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-12. Digital agency

The purpose of the standard is to ensure the rights, security, access and independence of a person in the digital environment.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
15512.01Internet accessThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "access to the Internet" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
15612.02Accessibility of digital devicesProportion of the target group for which the indicator "accessibility of digital devices" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
15712.03Basic digital literacyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "basic digital literacy" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
15812.04Digital Identity ManagementThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “digital identity management” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
15912.05Control of personal dataThe share of the target group for which the indicator "personal data control" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
16012.06KibergigienThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "cyber hygiene" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
16112.07Protection from Digital ViolenceThe share of the target group for which the indicator “protection against digital violence” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
16212.08Understanding algorithmic solutionsThe share of the target group for which the indicator “understanding algorithmic solutions” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
16312.09Skills of working with artificial intelligenceThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "skills in working with artificial intelligence" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
16412.10Accessibility of digital public servicesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "accessibility of digital public services" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
16512.11Digital InclusionThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "digital inclusion" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
16612.12Right to human considerationThe share of the target group for which the indicator “right to human consideration” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
16712.13Screen Time ManagementThe share of the target group for which the indicator "screen time management" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
16812.14Creation of digital contentThe share of the target group for which the indicator “creation of digital content” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-13. Creativity and innovation

The purpose of the standard is to provide the ability to create, research and implement socially useful solutions.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
16913.01Creative activityThe share of the target group for which the indicator "creative activity" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
17013.02Research skillsThe proportion of the target group for which the indicator of "research skills" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
17113.03Access to laboratories and workshopsThe share of the target group for which the indicator "access to laboratories and workshops" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
17213.04Access to funding initiativesThe share of the target group for which the indicator “access to financing initiatives” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
17313.05Protection of intellectual rightsThe share of the target group for which the indicator "protection of intellectual property rights" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
17413.06Team-building solutionsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “command creation of solutions” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
17513.07Experimentation and prototypingThe share of the target group for which the indicator "experimentation and prototyping" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
17613.08Implementation of resultsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "implementation of results" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
17713.09The Social Utility of InnovationThe share of the target group for which the indicator "social utility of innovations" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
17813.10Environmentally friendly innovationsThe share of the target group for which the indicator "environmental friendliness of innovations" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
17913.11Entrepreneurial implementation of ideasThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "entrepreneurial implementation of ideas" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
18013.12Open knowledge exchangeThe share of the target group for which the indicator “open knowledge exchange” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
18113.13Recognition of author's contributionThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "recognition of author's contribution" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
18213.14Scaling successful solutionsThe proportion of the target group for which the indicator “scaling of successful decisions” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-14. Social connections and solidarity

The purpose of the standard is to ensure belonging, trust, mutual assistance and participation in communities.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
18314.01Presence of close linksThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “the presence of close ties” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
18414.02Trust in the immediate surroundingsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “trust in the immediate environment” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
18514.03Mutual assistanceThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "mutual assistance" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
18614.04Involvement in communitiesThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "inclusion in communities" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
18714.05Protection from social exclusionThe share of the target group for which the indicator “protection from social isolation” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
18814.06Quality of communicationThe share of the target group for which the indicator "quality of communication" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
18914.07Voluntary activityThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "volunteer activity" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
19014.08Intergenerational interactionThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "intergenerational interaction" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
19114.09Neighbourhood cooperationThe share of the target group for which the indicator "neighborly cooperation" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
19214.10Inclusion of vulnerable groupsThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "inclusion of vulnerable groups" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
19314.11Conflict ResolutionThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of “conflict resolution” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
19414.12Social trustThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "social trust" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
19514.13Access to public spacesThe share of the target group for which the indicator "access to public spaces" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-15. Civic participation

The purpose of the standard is to ensure informed participation in public life and decision-making.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
19615.01Knowledge of civil rights and dutiesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “knowledge of civil rights and obligations” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
19715.02Participation in elections and votingThe share of the target group for which the indicator "participation in elections and voting" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
19815.03Participation in public discussionsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "participation in public discussions" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
19915.04Access to public informationThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "access to public information" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
20015.05Citizens' appeals and initiativesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "appeals and initiatives of citizens" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
20115.06Public controlThe share of the target group for which the indicator "public control" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
20215.07Participation in local self-governmentThe share of the target group for which the indicator “participation in local self-government” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
20315.08Membership in public associationsThe share of the target group for which the indicator “membership in public associations” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
20415.09Experience of joint problem solvingThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “experience of joint problem solving” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
20515.10Trust in participation proceduresThe proportion of the target group for which the indicator "confidence in participation procedures" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
20615.11Getting feedback from authoritiesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “getting feedback from authorities” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
20715.12Competence of public dialogueThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "competence of public dialogue" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
20815.13Impact of participation on decisionsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “influence of participation on decisions” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-16. Environmental responsibility

The purpose of the standard is to ensure responsible environmental management and restoration of ecosystems.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
20916.01Separate waste collectionThe share of the target group for which the indicator of “separate waste collection” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
21016.02Reducing waste generationThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “reduce waste generation” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
21116.03Energy-efficient behaviourThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "energy-efficient behavior" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
21216.04Water savingThe share of the target group for which the indicator "water saving" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
21316.05Responsible consumptionThe share of the target group for which the indicator "responsible consumption" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
21416.06Use of environmentally friendly transportThe share of the target group for which the indicator "use of environmentally friendly transport" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
21516.07Participation in the restoration of natureThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "participation in the restoration of nature" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
21616.08Conservation of biodiversityProportion of the target group for which the indicator “preservation of biodiversity” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
21716.09Ecological nutritionThe share of the target group for which the indicator "environmental nutrition" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
21816.10Keeping a Personal Environmental FootprintThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “accounting for a personal environmental footprint” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
21916.11Support for environmental initiativesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “support for environmental initiatives” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
22016.12Observance of environmental standardsProportion of the target group for which the indicator of “compliance with environmental standards” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
22116.13Transfer of environmental practicesThe share of the target group for which the indicator “transfer of environmental practices” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-17. Time and life trajectory management

The purpose of the standard is to ensure a balance of roles, time, goals and transitions between stages of life.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
22217.01Awareness of life goalsThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "life goals awareness" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
22317.02Time planningThe proportion of the target group for which the indicator "time planning" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
22417.03Balance of work and restThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "balance of work and rest" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
22517.04Balancing family and community rolesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “balance of family and social roles” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
22617.05Time for healthThe proportion of the target group for which the indicator of “health time” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
22717.06Time for trainingThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “time for training” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
22817.07Time for creativityThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “time for creativity” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
22917.08Quality of restThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "quality of rest" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
23017.09Overload managementThe share of the target group for which the indicator "overload management" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
23117.10Preparedness for life transitionsThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "readiness for life transitions" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
23217.11Updating the individual trajectoryThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "actualization of the individual trajectory" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
23317.12Achieving personal goalsThe share of the target group for which the indicator “achievement of personal goals” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
23417.13Subjective control of timeThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "subjective control over time" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.

СРЧ-18. Meaning and service

The purpose of the standard is to provide meaningful life, value certainty and contribution to the common good.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
23518.01Meaningfulness of lifeThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "meaningfulness of life" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
23618.02Value CertaintyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "value certainty" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
23718.03Conformity of actions with valuesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "compliance with values" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
23818.04A sense of purposeThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "sense of purpose" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
23918.05Contribution to the well-being of othersThe share of the target group for which the indicator “contribution to the well-being of others” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
24018.06Regularity of socially useful activitiesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “regularity of socially useful activity” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
24118.07Responsibility for the consequences of decisionsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “responsibility for the consequences of decisions” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
24218.08Ability to make moral choicesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "ability to moral choice" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
24318.09Appreciation and recognition of the contributions of othersThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "thanks and recognition of the contribution of others" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
24418.10Reconciliation of the personal and common goodThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "harmonization of personal and common good" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
24518.11Sustainability of meaning in crisisThe share of the target group for which the indicator “sustainability of meaning in the crisis” or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
24618.12Mentoring and Service ExperienceThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of “experience of mentoring and service” or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
24718.13Public impact assessmentThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “social impact assessment” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

СРЧ-19. Heritage and continuity

The purpose of the standard is to ensure the transfer of knowledge, culture, experience and results to future generations.

№CodeIndicatorRule of measurement
24819.01Fixation of life experienceThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "fixation of life experience" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
24919.02Transfer of professional knowledgeThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "transfer of professional knowledge" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
25019.03Mentoring the Next GenerationThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “mentoring the next generation” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
25119.04Preservation of family historyThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "preservation of family history" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
25219.05Transfer of cultural traditionsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of “transfer of cultural traditions” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
25319.06Continuity of public initiativesThe share of the target group, for which the indicator of "continuity of public initiatives" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
25419.07Durability of created resultsThe share of the target group for which the indicator of "durability of created results" or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
25519.08Open Access to KnowledgeThe share of the target group for which the indicator “open access to knowledge” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
25619.09Training of successorsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator "training of successors" or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of availability, quality and result.
25719.10Responsible Heritage ManagementThe share of the target group for which the indicator “responsible heritage management” or the standardized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
25819.11Intergenerational projectsThe share of the target group for which the indicator “intergenerational projects” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
25919.12Evaluation of long-term effectsThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “assessment of long-term consequences” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.
26019.13Contribution to the future of the TerritoryThe share of the target group, for which the indicator “contribution to the future of the territory” or the normalized value of profile statistics is confirmed; scale 0–100, with separate consideration of accessibility, quality and result.

5. Procedure for implementation

Step 1. Profiling

Determine the level of application, target groups, data sources, indicator owners and critical minimums.

Step 2. Base Line

Collect raw data, check the completeness and form a deficit map without publishing personal ratings.

Step 3. Target values

Approve values for 1, 3 and 6 years, taking into account the territory, age, life situation and the principle of non-discrimination.

Step 4. Programme of Action

Link deficits with projects, budgets, responsible organizations, ECO-PPA and community initiatives.

Step 5. Verification

Confirm methods, sources, samples and results by independent evaluation.

Step 6. Public reporting

Publish aggregated results, dynamics, problem areas and improvement measures in an understandable form.

Step 7. Revision

At least once every three years, update indicators, weights and thresholds based on evidence and public discussion.

6. Data management and ethical constraints

  • Minimization of personal data collected and limitation of the purposes of their use.
  • Separate storage of identifying information and analytical sets.
  • The right of a person to know the source of data, to correct an error and to appeal an automated decision.
  • Prohibition of the sale of personal development profiles and the use of hidden behavioral manipulation.
  • Publish only aggregated data with sufficient group size and risk control of re-identification.
  • Compulsory assessment of the consequences for human rights before the introduction of a digital monitoring system.

7. Communication with the system SFERA - EQUILIBRIUM - ECO-PPA

SRCh 1.0 forms the system’s human-centred normative framework: SFERA gathers initiatives and creates a space of opportunities; EQUILIBRIUM reconciles the interests of the Person, society, the state, the economy and nature; ECO-PPA translates goals into contractual programmes, resources and verifiable commitments; PSOR assesses semantic and social value; EUT ensures interconnected registers, evidential support and accounting for impact.

Final provision

Development is recognized as successful when a person becomes healthier, freer, more competent, more independent and responsible, gets more opportunities to create and benefit without violating the dignity of other people and the balance of nature.

Published files

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

SFERA, EQUILIBRIUM and digital platforms

The architecture of digital systems, platforms, registers, data and media: from broad SFERA and EQUILIBRIUM concepts to specialised portals. Different documents and editions relating to the shared theme are preserved.

Materials: 39 · with full text: 39 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

SFERA · Full published text

Heritage Preservation Archive

Source Status: Primary Document

A planetary system for identifying, preserving, researching and passing humanity’s memory between generations

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/arkhiv-sokhraneniya-naslediya

Open on the site

Strategic concept

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

Contents

1. Summary and mission12. Libraries and archives
2. Subject and boundaries of the Archive13. Sacred and intangible heritage
3. Conservation principles14. Legacy of the Future
4. Heritage categories15. Legal and ethical model
5. Classes of Civilizational Value16. Management and participants
6. Passport of Heritage17. Safety and sustainability
7. System architecture18. Research and public access
8. Object Life Cycle19. Economic model
9. Physical infrastructure20. Stages of implementation
10. Digital contour21. Outcome indicators
11. Locks and caches22. Final positioning

1. Summary and mission

“Archive of heritage preservation” is a single planetary infrastructure that combines physical storage, digital repositories, scientific expertise, legal fixation and public memory. The archive does not replace museums, libraries, the state or the custodians of traditions. It creates a trust system through which heritage can be discovered, identified, preserved, explored and passed on to future generations.

Strategic objectives

  • prevention of loss of unique objects and knowledge;
  • creation of a unified standard for the description and confirmation of origin;
  • connecting a physical object with its digital twin;
  • Ensuring the rights of peoples, communities, owners and custodians;
  • formation of a reserve core of knowledge for recovery after crises;
  • Transfer of heritage from passive storage to safe cultural and scientific circulation.

2. Subject and boundaries of the Archive

The archive covers tangible objects, documentary evidence, intangible traditions, digital data, and critical knowledge. The unit of account becomes not only a thing, but also a related complex: an object, context, law, the carrier of knowledge, a digital model and a history of events.

LayerContentsResult
Materialartifacts, works, documents, collectionspreservation of object
Informationdescriptions, directories, researches, metadataEvidence-based memory
Legalowner, keeper, restrictions, originlegitimacy of operations
Culturallymeanings, language, rituals, traditionsPreservation of identity
Digitalcopies, models, keys, backup basesAccessibility and Resiliency

3. Conservation principles

Integrity

The object is preserved along with the context and origin.

Subsidiarity

The legacy remains with the rightful owner or cultural guardian.

Non-removal

The registry does not become a mechanism of forced centralization.

Evidence

Every action is recorded and can be verified.

Reasonable availability

Openness is proportional to risk and cultural constraints.

Intergenerational responsibility

Decisions are evaluated on the horizon of many generations.

Technological independence

Data is stored in portable formats and multiple environments.

Respect for civilizational diversity

A single standard does not unify meanings and traditions.

4. Heritage categories

CategoryCompositionBasic mode
Cladscoins, jewelry, relics, archaeological complexeslegal fixation, examination, conservation
Skhronacaches, archives, backups, time capsulesSecure disclosure and logging
Librariesbooks, manuscripts, maps, scientific foundationsrestoration, digitization, access
Archivesstate, religious, generic, corporate documentsorigin, connectivity, access mode
Museum fundsart, artefacts, collectionsclimate, accounting, exposure
Archeologysettlements, burials, underwater objectsplace protection and digital twin
Sacredshrines, relics, temple objectsCultural and Religious Protocol
Orallanguages, epics, music, ritualsaudiovisual recording and transmission
Digitalknowledge base, code, digital artDistributed reservation
FutureSeed banks, genetic and technological collectionslong-term storage and recovery

5. Classes of Civilizational Value

ClassLevelCriterion
C1Localfamily, settlement, community
C2Regionalhistorical region or cultural area
C3Nationalidentity and memory of the people or state
C4Inter-civilizationalLinking several cultures and eras
C5Worldunique heritage of mankind
C6Critical Planetaryknowledge and resources for the survival and restoration of civilization

Class does not determine the market price. It sets the depth of preservation, reservation, control, ethical expertise and international interaction.

6. Passport of Heritage

Each object or complex is assigned a permanent identifier and a "Heritage Passport" is created - a connecting layer between the physical object, digital record, rights and cultural context.

  • identification, description, images and tags;
  • geography, time and circumstances of origin;
  • cultural identity and semantic description;
  • chain of ownership and legal status;
  • material composition, condition and risks;
  • class of civilizational value;
  • storage, access and use mode;
  • digital double and checksums;
  • history of research, restoration and relocation;
  • protocol of actions in case of threat or evacuation.

7. System architecture

LevelFunctionTools
1. Objectphysical or intangible heritage unittags, packaging, media
2. Passportidentity, law, state, historyMetadata registry and standards
3. Repositorypreservation of objects and reliable recordsstorage facilities, libraries, data centers
4. Network of Trustverification and exchange between custodiansaccreditation, audit, compatibility
5. Planetary Indexsearch, navigation and threat assessmentHeritage Map and Analytical Center

8. Object Life Cycle

  1. Identify and provide primary preservation.
  2. Define context, origin, and law.
  3. Conduct scientific, cultural and technical expertise.
  4. To assign a category and class of civilizational value.
  5. Create a passport and a digital double.
  6. Designate a physical and digital storage mode.
  7. Monitor, research and controlled use.
  8. Transfer, exhibit, repatriate or withdraw from the regime according to the approved protocol.

9. Physical infrastructure

The network is built as a distributed system of specialized environments, not as one centralized storage.

Art Repositories

climate, light, condition report, restoration readiness.

Security House

safe zones for relics, jewelry and especially valuable carriers.

Library Storage

control of paper, leather, parchment, film and magnetic media.

Archaeological Reserves

preservation of the object in the context of the place.

Underwater contours

monitoring and documentation of objects without premature rise.

Cryo- and Biobanks

seeds, genetic samples, microorganisms.

Strategic asylums

Backups of knowledge, recovery tools and stand-alone stocks.

10. Digital contour

  • Distributed storage in at least three independent jurisdictions or environments;
  • open formats and regular migration of data;
  • cryptographic integrity control without disclosing confidential information;
  • versions, event logs and provenance;
  • Semantic graph of connections between objects, people, places and epochs;
  • Digital twins for research, education and recovery;
  • Separate public, research, storage and special access circuits.

11. Locks and caches

The treasure or cache is not considered as a collection of individual finds, but as a historical complex. The key value is often the mutual location of objects, the circumstances of concealment and the connection with the events of the era.

Order of action

  1. fix the place without interference;
  2. provide temporary protection;
  3. notify the competent authorities and scientific specialists;
  4. create a primary closed passport;
  5. conduct a survey using non-destructive methods;
  6. organize extraction, conservation and legal registration;
  7. determine the mode of publication and further storage.

12. Libraries and archives

Libraries and archives are the infrastructure of continuity of thinking. The system retains not only rare units, but also the structure of the fund: directories, comments, litters, links between versions and history of use.

ContourPriorityFeature
HandwrittenUniqueness and material carriermultispectral shooting, conservation
Printablecompleteness and variability of publicationsaccounting of editorials and marginals
Audiovisualformats and playback equipmentMigration without loss of quality
Scientificdata, methods, negative resultsreproducibility of the study
Closedpersonal, state, sacred informationDeferred Disclosure and Separation of Rights

13. Sacred and intangible heritage

Sacred objects and living traditions require not only technical, but also ethical storage. The decision to access, copy and publish is made with the participation of the bearers of tradition.

  • free, prior and informed consent of the community;
  • the right of the cultural guardian to restrict disclosure;
  • inadmissibility of separation of the record from the semantic context;
  • mandatory indication of language, media and conditions of performance;
  • transfer of knowledge through training of new carriers, and not only through recording.

14. Legacy of the Future

The archive should preserve not only the memory of the past, but also the ability of civilization to continue to develop after systemic crises.

ReserveWhat RemainsPurpose
Biologicalseeds, genetic samples, microorganismsBiodiversity restoration
Technologicaldrawings, processes, materials, metrologyRecovery of production
Scientificbasic theories, data, verification methodsresumption of research
Languagedictionaries, grammar, corpus, pronunciationPreservation of cultural diversity
InstitutionalLegal and Management ModelsRestoration of public organization

15. Legal and ethical model

The archive acts as a trusted coordinator and infrastructure operator. The entry in the register does not change the ownership or the sovereignty of states, peoples, religious organizations or private owners.

  • the presumption of legal possession with mandatory verification of origin;
  • prohibition of legalization of illegally exported or purchased objects;
  • mechanism for notification, contestation and correction of the record;
  • priority of preservation in case of conflict of short-term benefit and public interest;
  • special mode for human remains, sacred objects and sensitive data;
  • transparent protocol of restitution and repatriation;
  • separation of scientific expertise, storage, insurance and orders.

16. Management and participants

ParticipantRole
the Guardians Councilprinciples, ethics, resolution of complex cases
Scientific CouncilMethods of identification, classification and research
National nodesrelations with the law, registers and institutions of the country
Cultural communitiesmeaning, consent, limitations, transmission of tradition
Storage Operatorsphysical safety and SLA
Digital Repositoriesreservation, integrity and compatibility
Insurance and logistics partnersRisk assessment and safe movement
Public observation circuitTransparency and protection of public interest

17. Safety and sustainability

Multi-level protection

perimeter, zones, roles, two-factor access, logging.

Geographical reservation

Independent copies and alternative sites.

Continuity plans

scenarios of fire, flood, war, cyberattacks and degradation of carriers.

Control of insider risk

Separation of powers and the principle of two keys.

Recurrent exercises

check evacuation, data recovery and operator change.

Antifragile

Each incident improves standards and architecture.

18. Research and public access

Access is built on the principle of "as open as possible - as safe and ethical as possible." The public portal shows verified information, and sensitive information remains in protected circuits.

Level of accessUsersContents
Publiccitizens, schools, touristsdescriptions, stories, digital expositions
Educationalteachers, students, museumscourses, collections, methodical sets
ResearchAccredited specialistsextended data and high-quality copies
WardenOwners and operatorsstatus, events, accesses, contracts
SpecialAuthorized bodies and councilsclosed coordinates, risks, restrictions

19. Economic model

Funding is generated from multiple sources so that the public mission is not dependent on a single donor or commercial flow.

  • state and interstate conservation programs;
  • trust funds, endowments and charitable contributions;
  • Membership fees of the network institutions;
  • storage, digitization, expertise, insurance and logistics services;
  • licensing of educational digital products;
  • Corporate programs of responsibility and patronage;
  • Trust bonds and other proven infrastructure financing instruments.

20. Stages of implementation

StageTimeframeResult
1. Standard0–6 monthsterms, passport, classes, ethics, protocols
2. Pilot6–18 monthsthree categories, multiple custodians, digital registry
3. The National Network18–36 monthsNodes, accreditation, integration of institutions
4. International compatibility3–5 yearsexchange of passports, joint exercises and projects
5. Planetary Index5+ yearsGlobal Heritage Map and Early Warning System

Recommended Pilot Set

  • manuscript or library fund;
  • private collection of art or relics;
  • archaeological complex or documented treasure;
  • a sample of intangible heritage;
  • reserve of scientific and technological knowledge.

21. Outcome indicators

MeasurementExamples of indicators
Coverageobjects, complexes, languages, territories, custodians
Securityrisk reduction, condition, number of prevented losses
EvidenceProportion of complete passports and proven chains of origin
Digital Sustainabilitynumber of independent copies, successful restorations
Accessresearch appeals, educational programs
Fairnesscommunity participation, restitution, settled disputes
ReadinessResults of exercises and recovery time of critical knowledge

22. Final positioning

The Heritage Preservation Archive is a memory of Civilization organized as a living system. It connects the treasure and the library, the museum and the data center, the custodian of tradition and the researcher, the state and the private owner, the past and the future.

The archive does not turn heritage into a warehouse. It provides him with a continuation of life: it preserves authenticity, explains meaning, protects right, opens knowledge and passes memory to those who come after us.

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

Preserve the memory of the Earth - ensure the continuity of the future.

Other published edition: HERITAGE OF CIVILIZATIONS Archive_preservation_heritage_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

PLAYERS AND STORAGES

PAST

ARCHIVE

STORAGE

LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES

HERITAGE

REALLY

STORAGE OF KNOWLEDGE

The Planetary Memory System of Humanity

FUTURE

CONTINUOUS MEMORY OF CIVILIZATION

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

Heritage should live longer than its keepers

The loss of heritage is a rupture of memory, rights, identity and ability

Rebuilding civilization after the crisis.

Physical loss

Meaningful loss

Digital loss

destruction, degradation, natural objects are preserved, but lost

Formats, media and keys become

Disaster context inaccessible Answer is a single distributed conservation system.

The Basis of the Book of Adonis

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

The archive is not a warehouse, but a supersystem of trust

Ordinary Archive

Heritage Preservation Archive

stores documents and funds connects the object, context, law, custodian, digital twin and manages the event history directory provides access coordinated by museums, libraries, repositories and community Unit of Account - a linked complex, not a separate thing.

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

Ten contours cover the memory of the Earth

Clads

Skhrona

Libraries

Archives

Museum funds

Archeology

Sacred

Oral

Digital

Legacy of the Future

A single logic is different modes of physical, legal, ethical and digital preservation.

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

Value is determined by the scale of responsibility

Local

Regional

National

Between

World

Critical

Civilizations Planetary Family • Cultural Memory of the People and Connections of Cultures and Heritage Survival and Settlement • Area of the State

EPOH

The class sets the depth of reservation, control and international interaction — not the market price.

Base: coniepine "Doviv preserved in half-

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

The heritage passport connects the object, law and meaning

Identity

HERITAGE PASSPORT

Object NoH-000147

Origin

Category: Manuscript Fund

State

Grade: S5

Guardian: National Node

Mode: climate + closed access

Law and Ethics

Digital twin: 3 copies

History

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

Five levels form a planetary architecture

Object

Physical or intangible unit

Profile

Identity • Right • Status • History

Repository

preservation of objects and reliable records

Network of Trust

verification and exchange between custodians

Planetary Index

search • navigation • threat assessment

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

A single life cycle retains context

Detect

Set the right

Explore

Classify

Digitize

Post

Monitor

Transmit

No stage breaks the connection between the object, place, meaning and history of events.

The Basis of the Book of Adonis

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

The physical network is divided into specialized

Wednesdays

Art Repositories

Security House

Biblioteka

Archeological

Reservoir Storage Climate • Light - Restoration Relics • Jewellery • especially paper • Skin • Parchment • preservation of the object in the context of readiness of valuable place film carriers

Underwater contours

Cryo- and Biobanks

Strategic asylums

monitoring without seeds • genetic samples - knowledge - tools - premature rise microorganisms autonomous reserves

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

The digital circuit makes the legacy recoverable

3+ independent copies

DIGITAL DOUBLE

Not a copy of the object, but a verifiable

A model of its state, context

Portable formats

and connections.

regular migration without loss of meaning open formats checksums

Separate access

Version and History of Events Public - Research - Guardian - Special

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

The castle is preserved as a historical complex

Do not extract without fixing the context.

Do not post an exact geolocation until security is ensured.

Do not separate the complex until the scientific description.

Fixation of the place

Temporary security

Scientific survey

Closed passport

Extraction and conservation

Law and regime

Publications

The Basis of the Book of Adonis

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

Libraries keep thinking.

Handwritten

unique carrier multispectral shooting

Printable

completeness of editorial and marginal editions

Audiovisual

formats and devices migration without loss of quality

Scientific

Data and methods of reproducibility of research

Closed

Sensitive information delayed disclosure

The Basis of the Book of Adonis

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

A Living and Sacred Heritage Requires Consent

Community

The Guardian

Archive

defines meaning, conditions preserve context, language, ritual, and

It captures knowledge and provides

disclosure and the permissibility of the restriction transfer to new media copying The recording does not replace the tradition. Conservation ends only when knowledge lives on.

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

The legacy of the future retains the ability to recover

Biological

Technological

Scientific reserve

Language reserve

Institutions of society

Reserve Restore:

Restore:

Restore:

Restore:

Restore:

Biodiversity Production Research Cultural Diversity Organization The Archives preserves not only the past but it reserves the continuation of Civilization.

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

Property rights remain - liability expands

Guarantees

Limitations

register does not change the owner can not legalize illegal trafficking sovereignty and community rights are preserved can not commercialize sacred without consent access can be challenged and corrected can not replace the scientific assessment of the owner's interest restitution passes through a transparent protocol Heritage belongs to specific custodians, but its preservation is the common responsibility of mankind.

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

The network is managed through the division of roles

Council

Scientific Council

National nodes

Cultural

Community Keepers Ethics and Complex Cases Methodology and Law and Institutions Meaning and Consent Classification

Storage Operators

Digital Repositories

Insurance and

Public

logistics contour safety and SLA redundancy and risk and movement transparency and balance compatibility of interests

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

Pilot Proves Standard to Global Scale

0-6 months

6-18 months

18-36 months

3-5 years 5+ years

Standard

Pilot

National

International

Planetary

Network Compatibility Index Terms • Passport •, Types of Heritage Nodes • Accreditation • exchange of passports • Heritage Map • Early Classes • Zeestre Ethics • the Joint Exercises Warning

Basis: the concept of " Adverse Conservation

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

Preserving the Earth's Memory

NEXT STEP

ensure continuity of the future

Standard

→ PILFrom → Planetary Network

The archive connects the treasure and the library, the museum and the data center, the custodian

tradition and researcher, past and future.

index

Timely criception • 2026

Published files

SFERA · Full published text

HERITAGE PRESERVATION ARCHIVE. A Planetary System for Humanity’s Memory

Source Status: Primary Document

A planetary system for identifying, preserving, researching and passing humanity’s memory between generations

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/arkhiv-sokhraneniya-naslediya-integratsionnaya-ekosistema

Open on the site

Strategic concept

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov · SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

Contents

1. Summary and mission12. Libraries and archives
2. Subject and boundaries of the Archive13. Sacred and intangible heritage
3. Conservation principles14. Legacy of the Future
4. Heritage categories15. Legal and ethical model
5. Classes of Civilizational Value16. Management and participants
6. Passport of Heritage17. Safety and sustainability
7. System architecture18. Research and public access
8. Object Life Cycle19. Economic model
9. Physical infrastructure20. Stages of implementation
10. Digital contour21. Outcome indicators
11. Locks and caches22. Final positioning

1. Summary and mission

“Archive of heritage preservation” is a single planetary infrastructure that combines physical storage, digital repositories, scientific expertise, legal fixation and public memory. The archive does not replace museums, libraries, the state or the custodians of traditions. It creates a trust system through which heritage can be discovered, identified, preserved, explored and passed on to future generations.

Strategic objectives

  • prevention of loss of unique objects and knowledge;
  • creation of a unified standard for the description and confirmation of origin;
  • connecting a physical object with its digital twin;
  • Ensuring the rights of peoples, communities, owners and custodians;
  • formation of a reserve core of knowledge for recovery after crises;
  • Transfer of heritage from passive storage to safe cultural and scientific circulation.

2. Subject and boundaries of the Archive

The archive covers tangible objects, documentary evidence, intangible traditions, digital data, and critical knowledge. The unit of account becomes not only a thing, but also a related complex: an object, context, law, the carrier of knowledge, a digital model and a history of events.

LayerContentsResult
Materialartifacts, works, documents, collectionspreservation of object
Informationdescriptions, directories, researches, metadataEvidence-based memory
Legalowner, keeper, restrictions, originlegitimacy of operations
Culturallymeanings, language, rituals, traditionsPreservation of identity
Digitalcopies, models, keys, backup basesAccessibility and Resiliency

3. Conservation principles

Integrity

The object is preserved along with the context and origin.

Subsidiarity

The legacy remains with the rightful owner or cultural guardian.

Non-removal

The registry does not become a mechanism of forced centralization.

Evidence

Every action is recorded and can be verified.

Reasonable availability

Openness is proportional to risk and cultural constraints.

Intergenerational responsibility

Decisions are evaluated on the horizon of many generations.

Technological independence

Data is stored in portable formats and multiple environments.

Respect for civilizational diversity

A single standard does not unify meanings and traditions.

4. Heritage categories

CategoryCompositionBasic mode
Cladscoins, jewelry, relics, archaeological complexeslegal fixation, examination, conservation
Skhronacaches, archives, backups, time capsulesSecure disclosure and logging
Librariesbooks, manuscripts, maps, scientific foundationsrestoration, digitization, access
Archivesstate, religious, generic, corporate documentsorigin, connectivity, access mode
Museum fundsart, artefacts, collectionsclimate, accounting, exposure
Archeologysettlements, burials, underwater objectsplace protection and digital twin
Sacredshrines, relics, temple objectsCultural and Religious Protocol
Orallanguages, epics, music, ritualsaudiovisual recording and transmission
Digitalknowledge base, code, digital artDistributed reservation
FutureSeed banks, genetic and technological collectionslong-term storage and recovery

5. Classes of Civilizational Value

ClassLevelCriterion
C1Localfamily, settlement, community
C2Regionalhistorical region or cultural area
C3Nationalidentity and memory of the people or state
C4Inter-civilizationalLinking several cultures and eras
C5Worldunique heritage of mankind
C6Critical Planetaryknowledge and resources for the survival and restoration of civilization

Class does not determine the market price. It sets the depth of preservation, reservation, control, ethical expertise and international interaction.

6. Passport of Heritage

Each object or complex is assigned a permanent identifier and a "Heritage Passport" is created - a connecting layer between the physical object, digital record, rights and cultural context.

  • identification, description, images and tags;
  • geography, time and circumstances of origin;
  • cultural identity and semantic description;
  • chain of ownership and legal status;
  • material composition, condition and risks;
  • class of civilizational value;
  • storage, access and use mode;
  • digital double and checksums;
  • history of research, restoration and relocation;
  • protocol of actions in case of threat or evacuation.

7. System architecture

LevelFunctionTools
1. Objectphysical or intangible heritage unittags, packaging, media
2. Passportidentity, law, state, historyMetadata registry and standards
3. Repositorypreservation of objects and reliable recordsstorage facilities, libraries, data centers
4. Network of Trustverification and exchange between custodiansaccreditation, audit, compatibility
5. Planetary Indexsearch, navigation and threat assessmentHeritage Map and Analytical Center

8. Object Life Cycle

  1. Identify and provide primary preservation.
  2. Define context, origin, and law.
  3. Conduct scientific, cultural and technical expertise.
  4. To assign a category and class of civilizational value.
  5. Create a passport and a digital double.
  6. Designate a physical and digital storage mode.
  7. Monitor, research and controlled use.
  8. Transfer, exhibit, repatriate or withdraw from the regime according to the approved protocol.

9. Physical infrastructure

The network is built as a distributed system of specialized environments, not as one centralized storage.

Art Repositories

climate, light, condition report, restoration readiness.

Security House

safe zones for relics, jewelry and especially valuable carriers.

Library Storage

control of paper, leather, parchment, film and magnetic media.

Archaeological Reserves

preservation of the object in the context of the place.

Underwater contours

monitoring and documentation of objects without premature rise.

Cryo- and Biobanks

seeds, genetic samples, microorganisms.

Strategic asylums

Backups of knowledge, recovery tools and stand-alone stocks.

10. Digital contour

  • Distributed storage in at least three independent jurisdictions or environments;
  • open formats and regular migration of data;
  • cryptographic integrity control without disclosing confidential information;
  • versions, event logs and provenance;
  • Semantic graph of connections between objects, people, places and epochs;
  • Digital twins for research, education and recovery;
  • Separate public, research, storage and special access circuits.

11. Locks and caches

The treasure or cache is not considered as a collection of individual finds, but as a historical complex. The key value is often the mutual location of objects, the circumstances of concealment and the connection with the events of the era.

Order of action

  1. fix the place without interference;
  2. provide temporary protection;
  3. notify the competent authorities and scientific specialists;
  4. create a primary closed passport;
  5. conduct a survey using non-destructive methods;
  6. organize extraction, conservation and legal registration;
  7. determine the mode of publication and further storage.

12. Libraries and archives

Libraries and archives are the infrastructure of continuity of thinking. The system retains not only rare units, but also the structure of the fund: directories, comments, litters, links between versions and history of use.

ContourPriorityFeature
HandwrittenUniqueness and material carriermultispectral shooting, conservation
Printablecompleteness and variability of publicationsaccounting of editorials and marginals
Audiovisualformats and playback equipmentMigration without loss of quality
Scientificdata, methods, negative resultsreproducibility of the study
Closedpersonal, state, sacred informationDeferred Disclosure and Separation of Rights

13. Sacred and intangible heritage

Sacred objects and living traditions require not only technical, but also ethical storage. The decision to access, copy and publish is made with the participation of the bearers of tradition.

  • free, prior and informed consent of the community;
  • the right of the cultural guardian to restrict disclosure;
  • inadmissibility of separation of the record from the semantic context;
  • mandatory indication of language, media and conditions of performance;
  • transfer of knowledge through training of new carriers, and not only through recording.

14. Legacy of the Future

The archive should preserve not only the memory of the past, but also the ability of civilization to continue to develop after systemic crises.

ReserveWhat RemainsPurpose
Biologicalseeds, genetic samples, microorganismsBiodiversity restoration
Technologicaldrawings, processes, materials, metrologyRecovery of production
Scientificbasic theories, data, verification methodsresumption of research
Languagedictionaries, grammar, corpus, pronunciationPreservation of cultural diversity
InstitutionalLegal and Management ModelsRestoration of public organization

15. Legal and ethical model

The archive acts as a trusted coordinator and infrastructure operator. The entry in the register does not change the ownership or the sovereignty of states, peoples, religious organizations or private owners.

  • the presumption of legal possession with mandatory verification of origin;
  • prohibition of legalization of illegally exported or purchased objects;
  • mechanism for notification, contestation and correction of the record;
  • priority of preservation in case of conflict of short-term benefit and public interest;
  • special mode for human remains, sacred objects and sensitive data;
  • transparent protocol of restitution and repatriation;
  • separation of scientific expertise, storage, insurance and orders.

16. Management and participants

ParticipantRole
the Guardians Councilprinciples, ethics, resolution of complex cases
Scientific CouncilMethods of identification, classification and research
National nodesrelations with the law, registers and institutions of the country
Cultural communitiesmeaning, consent, limitations, transmission of tradition
Storage Operatorsphysical safety and SLA
Digital Repositoriesreservation, integrity and compatibility
Insurance and logistics partnersRisk assessment and safe movement
Public observation circuitTransparency and protection of public interest

17. Safety and sustainability

Multi-level protection

perimeter, zones, roles, two-factor access, logging.

Geographical reservation

Independent copies and alternative sites.

Continuity plans

scenarios of fire, flood, war, cyberattacks and degradation of carriers.

Control of insider risk

Separation of powers and the principle of two keys.

Recurrent exercises

check evacuation, data recovery and operator change.

Antifragile

Each incident improves standards and architecture.

18. Research and public access

Access is built on the principle of "as open as possible - as safe and ethical as possible." The public portal shows verified information, and sensitive information remains in protected circuits.

Level of accessUsersContents
Publiccitizens, schools, touristsdescriptions, stories, digital expositions
Educationalteachers, students, museumscourses, collections, methodical sets
ResearchAccredited specialistsextended data and high-quality copies
WardenOwners and operatorsstatus, events, accesses, contracts
SpecialAuthorized bodies and councilsclosed coordinates, risks, restrictions

19. Economic model

Funding is generated from multiple sources so that the public mission is not dependent on a single donor or commercial flow.

  • state and interstate conservation programs;
  • trust funds, endowments and charitable contributions;
  • Membership fees of the network institutions;
  • storage, digitization, expertise, insurance and logistics services;
  • licensing of educational digital products;
  • Corporate programs of responsibility and patronage;
  • Trust bonds and other proven infrastructure financing instruments.

20. Stages of implementation

StageTimeframeResult
1. Standard0–6 monthsterms, passport, classes, ethics, protocols
2. Pilot6–18 monthsthree categories, multiple custodians, digital registry
3. The National Network18–36 monthsNodes, accreditation, integration of institutions
4. International compatibility3–5 yearsexchange of passports, joint exercises and projects
5. Planetary Index5+ yearsGlobal Heritage Map and Early Warning System

Recommended Pilot Set

  • manuscript or library fund;
  • private collection of art or relics;
  • archaeological complex or documented treasure;
  • a sample of intangible heritage;
  • reserve of scientific and technological knowledge.

21. Outcome indicators

MeasurementExamples of indicators
Coverageobjects, complexes, languages, territories, custodians
Securityrisk reduction, condition, number of prevented losses
EvidenceProportion of complete passports and proven chains of origin
Digital Sustainabilitynumber of independent copies, successful restorations
Accessresearch appeals, educational programs
Fairnesscommunity participation, restitution, settled disputes
ReadinessResults of exercises and recovery time of critical knowledge

22. Platform integration ecosystem

The platform combines physical storage, digital object passport, protected logistics, insurance, state identification and regulated investment mechanisms. Integrations are connected through a single core "Heritage Connect", and partner services receive only the necessary minimum of data.

22.1. Integration core "Heritage Connect"

  • a single identifier and digital passport of the object, party or collection;
  • API-gateway for partners, consent management and access roles;
  • Journal of origin, acceptance, movements, inspections and insurance events;
  • Routing module taking into account the value, legal regime and environmental conditions;
  • calculation of tariff, insurance coverage, customs payments and terms;
  • electronic signature, immutable transaction log and independent audit.

22.2. Channels and partner contours

ContourRole in the systemConnection mechanismKey limitation
Yandex Go and local couriersLast mile, export and returnOrdering a protected tariff, tracking, identity verification and transmissionOnly admissible classes; valuable objects - through specialized carriers
Wildberries, Ozon, AlibabaShowcase of permitted services and goods, international demandCard from digital passport, order storage, restoration, digital copyDo not allow free sale of objects with limited turnover
Postal operatorsDocuments, small consignments, notificationsTracking, electronic invoices, inventory, declared valueArt objects and jewelry - only according to special rules
Air and rail carriersInterregional and international highwayBooking, cargo manifest, environmental control, sealingExport control, customs, dangerous and oversized goods
Insurance companiesStorage and transportation coverageCalculation of the risk on the passport, electronic policy, event settlementIndependent evaluation, exceptions and limits should be transparent
WeChatAccess channel for international customersMini-application, notifications, payment for permitted servicesData localization and verification of cross-border requirements
Public services and MFC "My documents"Identification, statements, powers of attorney and statusesESIA/SMEV, if there are legal grounds, face-to-face verification through the MFCOnly official integrations and minimization of personal data

22.3. Cross-Scenario of Object Movement

  1. Registration: the owner passes identification and creates a preliminary card.
  2. Expertise: Authentication, origin, ownership and turnover restrictions are confirmed.
  3. Classification: The object receives a value category, access mode and transport and environment requirements.
  4. Logistics: the system forms the route, selects the carrier, seals, escort and customs scheme.
  5. Acceptance: the depositary records the condition, mass, photo, packaging and tell-tales.
  6. Storage: Sensors, inspections and events automatically complement the digital passport.
  7. Access or release: the object is returned to the owner, provided for research / exhibition or becomes the security of a permitted financial instrument.

22.4. Investment contour of long-term storage

A financial product is not produced “out of the thing” but out of legally enforceable law or cash flow. The object remains in independent storage, and the investor receives a security, digital financial right, share or other regulated requirement.

ToolEconomic frameworkSuitable assetsProtective mechanism
Operator's bonds or SPVRevenues from storage, lease, licence or operation of infrastructureContract portfolio and predictable cash flowsPledge/assignment of rights, covenants, reserve, audit
Digital financial assetsMonetary claim or right described in the issuance decisionStandardized pool of valued assetsInformation system operator, risk disclosure, rights register
Closed cooperative share fundShare in the property complex and income of the fundReal estate, collections and other permissible assetsManagement company, special depository, appraiser and auditor
Warehousing/deposit certificateRight to claim the identified goods or pledgeStandardized long-term storageLicensed warehouse, quality control, insurance
Securitization of portfolioPool of contract paymentsLarge diversified portfolio of storage and servicesSPV, waterfall payments, reservation and reporting
Binding institutional framework
  • a separate SPV or fund that does not mix the assets of customers with the operator’s property;
  • independent custodian, appraiser, insurer, auditor and depositary/accounting operator;
  • full security passport: origin, law, condition, assessment, restrictions and insurance;
  • regular revaluation, liquidity stress test and public disclosure of significant events;
  • prohibition of double bail and automatic blocking of security orders for the release period.
Red zone: what can not be automatically monetized
  • objects of cultural heritage with prohibition or restriction of alienation and exportation;
  • Sacred objects, human remains and the heritage of communities without their free prior consent;
  • disputed, stolen, illegally exported or having a rupture of origin of value;
  • State museum, archival and library funds, if a special law does not allow the chosen model;
  • objects, the assessment and liquidity of which do not allow the investor to honestly disclose the risk.

22.5. Launch order

  1. Pilot: identification, digital passport, one depository, one insurer and one specialized carrier.
  2. Logistic network: connection of postal, courier, air and rail operators by categories of admission.
  3. Demand channels: marketplaces and WeChat to sell authorized services, digital copies and print products.
  4. State outline: statements and statuses through official gateways, face-to-face support through the MFC.
  5. Financial pilot: release of the instrument only on a standardized portfolio with independent storage and confirmed cash flow.

The practical principle of the launch: first legal purity, accounting and control of safety; then logistics and service revenue; only after the accumulation of a verifiable history - an investment issue.

23. Final positioning

The Heritage Preservation Archive is a memory of Civilization organized as a living system. It connects the treasure and the library, the museum and the data center, the custodian of tradition and the researcher, the state and the private owner, the past and the future.

The archive does not turn heritage into a warehouse. It provides him with a continuation of life: it preserves authenticity, explains meaning, protects right, opens knowledge and passes memory to those who come after us.

CIVILIZATION HERITAGE

Preserve the memory of the Earth - ensure the continuity of the future.

Other published edition: Archive_conservation_inheritance_integration_ecosystem Archive_conservation_inheritance_integration_ecosystem.pptx · web text +

Sources cited in presentation 2

  • The concept of "Archive of heritage preservation" and the statement of the user's task.
  • Financial and integration models are project-based and require legal and industry verification.

Published files

Data · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM Social Data Atlas

Source Status: Primary Document

The material describes an architecture for observing, understanding and developing society through data, connections, decisions and measurable impact.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/atlas-sotsialnykh-dannykh-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM

The Social Data Atlas is a digital system that combines information about people, families, territories, organizations, infrastructure, initiatives, resources, risks and outcomes into a single verifiable model of social reality. Its task is not just to store statistics, but to give grounds for decisions: where intervention is required, what resources are already available, who is able to act, what measures give results and how the quality of life changes.

System document • 2026

1. The Atlas Mission

The mission of Atlas is to create a single language of social data and move from disparate departmental datasets to a holistic picture of society, in which not only problems but also the potential for development are visible.

  • see the social reality at the level of the country, region, municipality, territory, community and project;
  • Compare the needs of the population with the infrastructure, financing, competencies and existing programs;
  • Identify risk areas prior to a crisis;
  • measure the effectiveness of social projects and government measures;
  • to form an evidence base for NGOs, business, authorities, development institutions and citizens;
  • support the design of new social services and targeted solutions.

2. The main principle: from statistics to the system of actions

Ordinary statistics answer the question "what happened?". The Atlas should answer six questions at once: what is happening, where, with whom, why, what resources are available and what action will have the greatest effect.

LevelQuestionResult
ObservationWhat's going on now?Events, indicators, dynamics
DiagnosticsWhere is the deviation and who has a problem?Risk and Vulnerability Map
CausalityWhat factors are related to the situation?Hypotheses and causal relationships
ResourcesWho and what can influence?Map of organizations, programs, finance, infrastructure
DecisionWhich action is preferable?Scenario of intervention
EvaluationHas the state changed after the action?Measurable social impact

3. Objects of social model

The core of the Atlas is built not around one registry, but around interconnected objects. Each object receives a unique identifier, a set of attributes, sources of confirmation, territorial binding and connections with other objects.

ObjectWhat we describeKey connections
Personsocio-demographic and life parameters in an impersonal/legal contourfamily, services, education, work, territory
Family / Householdcomposition, living conditions, load, access to serviceshousing, income, support measures
Territorypopulation, environment, infrastructure, risks, eventsorganizations, projects, facilities, indicators
OrganizationNPO, institution, enterprise, foundation, communityprojects, people, resources, partnerships
Project / Programpurpose, task force, budget, activities, KPIorganizations, territories, results
Resourcefinance, premises, equipment, competences, volunteersprojects, organizations, needs
Needdeficit, problem, request, risktarget group, territory, project
Eventchange, crisis, event, appeal, interventiontime, place, participants, consequences
Resultoutput, effect, change of stateproject, indicator, territory, group

4. 19 layers of the Social Data Atlas

№LayerContents
01Demographynumber, age, migration, household structure
02Income and welfareincome, expenditure, poverty, debt burden
03Employment and workemployment, professions, vacancies, unemployment, cooperation
04Educationaccessibility, trajectories, competencies, additional education
05Health and Well-beingaccessibility of infrastructure, prevention, social determinants
06Family and childhoodfamily support, children, parenthood, family infrastructure
07The older generationactive longevity, care, employment, accessibility of the environment
08Inclusion and accessibilitybarriers, special services, accessible environment
09Housing and environmenthousing, improvement, public accessibility
10Securitysocial risks, emergency events, prevention
11Culture and identityinstitutions, participation, heritage, local communities
12Sport and activityfacilities, availability, participation, mass programs
13Civic activityNGOs, volunteering, initiatives, self-organization
14Social servicessuppliers, capacities, queues, quality, result
15Digital accessibilitycommunication, digital services, skills, digital divide
16Environment and healthEnvironmental quality and social impacts
17Social economysocial entrepreneurship, cooperation, employment, procurement
18Financing for developmentbudgets, grants, donations, investments, PPA
19Social impactoutputs, results, sustainability, change in quality of life

5. Unified Register of NGOs and Social Initiatives

To work with the NGO ecosystem, Atlas should not become a copy of the catalog of organizations, but a “living passport” of the territory’s ability to solve social problems.

  • NGO passport: legal status, directions, geography, team, competencies, experience;
  • portfolio of projects: goals, groups, budgets, calendar, results, partners;
  • Sources of funding and history of support;
  • material and intangible resources;
  • proven practices and replicable solutions;
  • needs of the NGO itself: financing, premises, personnel, IT, partners;
  • reputation and evidence profile: reporting, transparency, confirmed results.

6. Indicators: three-tier system

LevelMeaningExamples
A. StatusWhat Happens to Society and Territoryemployment, access to services, migration balance
B. ActionsWhat the system doesProgramme coverage, number of services, resources, partnerships
C. EffectWhat has changed as a result of actionincreasing independence, reducing the deficit, improving accessibility

For each indicator are fixed: definition, formula, unit of measure, source, periodicity, geography, acceptable level of data quality, owner, limitations of use and connection with development goals.

7. Map of social needs

The need should be an independent object of data, and not just the text of the appeal. This allows you to aggregate requests, compare them with the offer and automatically find deficits.

Parameter of needDescription
Typeservices, infrastructure, financing, employment, education, assistance, security, etc.
Mediatorperson, group, community, organization, territory
Geographylocation, address, municipality, region
IntensityThe extent and depth of the deficit
UrgencyNormal / High / Critical
Confirmationofficial data, appeals, survey, expert assessment
Possible solutionsexisting programmes, implementers, resources, new initiative

8. Map of resources and opportunities

Atlas should show not only "where is bad", but also "what is already there". The resource card turns social analytics into an operating system of cooperation.

  • financial resources: budgets, grants, donations, social investments, targeted programs;
  • infrastructure: premises, centers, sports and cultural facilities, transport, digital sites;
  • human capital: specialists, mentors, volunteers, experts;
  • organizational resource: NGOs, institutions, business, initiative groups;
  • technologies and data: digital services, platforms, methods, educational products;
  • Time and availability of the resource: when it is free and under what conditions it can be used.

9. Hypergraph of social connections

The basic form of Atlas presentation is the hypergraph. Nodes represent people, organizations, projects, territories, resources, needs, and indicators; connections show participation, funding, impact, service delivery, partnership, affiliation, and cause-and-effect relationships.

This approach allows you to see not separate tables, but the configuration of the social system: who is associated with whom, where overload occurs, which organizations are centers of trust, which resources are isolated and which projects are able to cover several needs at the same time.

10. Social passport of the territory

Passport BlockWhat includes
Peoplepopulation structure, groups, dynamics
Quality of lifeKey social indicators
NeedsDeficits and risks
Infrastructurefacilities and capacities
OrganizationsNPOs, institutions, businesses, communities
ProjectsCurrent and planned initiatives
Resourcesfinance, personnel, premises, technology
EventsSignificant changes and treatment
EffectProgramme results and dynamics
Forecastscenarios for 1/3/5 years

11. Analytical regimes

  • Deficit map - where the need exceeds the available resource.
  • Coverage map - which groups and territories receive services and which fall out.
  • Map of cooperation - who is already working on the topic and with whom it makes sense to unite.
  • Efficiency map - what practices give a measurable result per unit of resource.
  • Risk maps are early signs of a worsening situation.
  • Map of potential — unused assets of the territory and social capital.
  • Scenario mode - a forecast of the consequences of various management decisions.
  • Single window mode - selection of projects, programs and performers for a specific need.

12. Not as an analysis, but as a navigation

A uniform rating of territories or organizations is allowed only as the top navigation layer. Decomposing indicators and evidence should remain at the core. Otherwise, the complex social reality turns into a dispute about a singular number.

IndexPurpose
Social Welfare IndexGeneral condition of the Territory
Accessibility IndexAccess to key services and infrastructure
Social activity indexdensity of initiatives, NGOs, volunteering, participation
Resource security indexAvailability and availability of resources
Vulnerability indexA combination of risk factors
Proven Effect IndexEffectiveness of programmes and projects
Cooperation indexConnectivity of participants and cross-sectoral partnerships

13. Data and trust contour

The Atlas should distinguish between published data, departmental data, organization data, user signals, and analytical findings. It is important for each fact to maintain the origin and level of trust.

Source classExamplesMonitoring
Official registriesstate statistics, registers, open datasource ID, date of update
Organizational dataReporting by NGOs and institutionsverification, documents, responsible
Project dataactivities, budgets, KPIPrimary evidence
Messages and Signalscitizens' requests, community messagesanti-duplication, moderation, geo-binding
Researchsurveys, monitoring, expert assessmentsMethodology and sampling
Estimatesindices, forecasts, modelsversion of the formula, calculation date, explicability

14. The rules of responsible work with data

  • privacy by design: personal data should not become a public layer of the Atlas;
  • Minimization: only the data required for a specific social task is collected;
  • separation of identification, analytical and public contours;
  • access control by roles and logging actions;
  • Depersonalization and aggregation for public cards;
  • the right to correct erroneous data in cases stipulated by law;
  • transparency of calculation methods and origin of indicators;
  • banning the automatic adoption of high-value decisions only on the basis of an opaque rating.

15. Integration layer

The Atlas is designed as a supersystem, not another closed base. Its key function is to connect external registers, platforms and information systems through API and a single object dictionary.

Integration circuitFunction
State systemsofficial indicators, support measures, infrastructure
the NGO Platformorganizations, projects, practices, support requests
Grant Systemscompetitions, applications, financing, results
Municipal and regional IPlocal infrastructure, appeals, programs
SFERAinitiatives, communities, events, cooperation
ECO-PPAresource and project contours, risk prevention
SPECZASHCHITAperformers, cooperation, pilots, production circuit
EQUILIBRIUManalytics, hypergraph, prediction, scenarios and results control

16. Platform architecture

  1. Layer 1 - data sources and connectors;
  2. Layer 2 - single data model and identifiers;
  3. Layer 3 - a repository of facts and time series;
  4. Layer 4 - graph of connections and ontology;
  5. Layer 5 - quality, verification and origin of data;
  6. Layer 6 - analytics, indices and models;
  7. Layer 7 - cards, dashboards and social passports;
  8. Layer 8 - design and cooperation contour;
  9. Layer 9 - API for external services;
  10. Layer 10 - Access management, security and audit.

17. User Roles

RoleWhat Gets
Citizenpublic card, available services, projects, opportunities for participation
NPOorganization passport, territory analytics, partners, grants and needs
MunicipalitySingle social passport and deficit card
Regioncomparison of territories, programs and dynamics
Federal levelsingle monitoring, scenarios, interregional imbalances
Businesssocial investment points and partnership projects
Foundation / Development Institutethe Initiatives funnel, evidence check and effect
Researcheranonymized data, methods and time series
Operator EQUILIBRIUMcross-cutting model of connections, risks, resources and solutions

18. Minimum viable product (MVP)

The first launch should not attempt to cover the entire country and all the data. One region or group of municipalities and five interconnected registries are sufficient.

  1. Register of NGOs and social organizations;
  2. register of social projects;
  3. register of needs and problems of the territory;
  4. Register of resources and infrastructure;
  5. Register of indicators and results.

MVP should be able to: show the map; open the passport of the territory; find an organization or project; compare the need with the resource; form a project card; build a basic dashboard; upload an analytical note.

19. Pilot "Atlas of NGOs and social activity"

The practical first module can be deployed around existing NPO platforms. Instead of competing with them, Atlas receives cataloguing from them and complements it with analytics, connectivity, and result measurement.

StageResult
1. InventoryMap of platforms, registries and open data sets
2. Normalizationcommon fields of organization, project, territory and result
3. Loading the pilot500–5000 organizations of one/several territories
4. Contactstopics, partnerships, financing, projects, territories
5. RequirementsCollection of requests from NGOs and territories
6. Analyticsmap of density, gaps, specializations, resources
7. CooperationFinding partners and collecting project consortia
8. EffectSingle minimum standard for reporting results

20. 20 Atlas Key Screens

  1. 1. Main country map
  2. 2. Passport of the region
  3. 3. Passport of the municipality
  4. 4. Map of NGOs
  5. 5. NPO Card
  6. 6. Project Map
  7. 7. Project Card
  8. 8. Map of needs
  9. 9. Need card
  10. 10. Resource map
  11. 11. Resource card
  12. 12. Infrastructure map
  13. 13. Map of social risks
  14. 14. Dashboard Quality of Life
  15. 15. Dashboard Grants and Funding
  16. 16. Partnerships graph
  17. 17. The Consortium Designer
  18. 18. Scenario forecast
  19. 19. Monitoring of social impact
  20. 20. Center for Reports and Analytical Notes

21. Management cycle

Atlas becomes a work system only when data is locked into a regular management cycle.

StepAction
1Collect and update data
2Identifying a change or deficit
3Identify the target group and territory
4Identify causes and related factors
5Compare available resources and performers
6Create a project solution
7Assign Result Indicators
8Run Execution
9Measure changes
10Maintain practice and scale with proven effect

22. EQUILIBRIUM As an analytical core

In the EQUILIBRIUM architecture, the Social Data Atlas is the outline of the observed social reality. It gives the system the actual basis for hypergraphing, forecasting, and decision design. SFERA provides a space for initiatives and participation; ECO-PPA provides a mechanism for resource concentration and threat prevention; and SPECZASHCHITA provides a cooperative execution circuit. The Atlas links all four elements through a single evidence-based data model.

23. What counts as success

  • data from different sources are comparable and have a clear origin;
  • For each territory, simultaneously visible needs, resources and performers;
  • NGOs and projects can be found not only by name, but by the ability to solve a specific task;
  • the manager sees not only expenses and activities, but a change in state;
  • the project can be traced from the problem to the resource, action, result and evidence;
  • Best practices become replicable, and repeated failures become visible.
  • The system helps to make decisions faster, more accurately and with less manual reconciliation.

24. Roadmap for deployment

PhaseContentsKey result
0. Designontology, dictionary, data policy, architectureTechnical and methodological specification
1. MVP5 registers, 1 pilot territory, base mapsworking prototype
2. Pilot of NPOintegration of catalogues and project dataMap of social activity
3. Social passportindicators, needs, infrastructureUnified Territory Profile
4. Cooperationsearch for resources, partners, consortiums gatheringProject Action Outline
5. EffectResults metrics and evidencePerformance assessment
6. Forecastrisks, scenarios, early warningAnalytical Core EQUILIBRIUM
7. ScalingInterregional and Federal Integrationthe National Atlas of Social Data

25. Final formula

DATA → RELATIONS → UNDERSTANDING → SOLUTION → ACTION → MEASURABLE EFFECT

The Social Data Atlas is not another portal or another registry. It is an infrastructure of public knowledge: a single environment in which the state of society becomes observable, resources visible, initiatives comparable, results demonstrable, and development manageable.

Annex. Minimum social object card

FieldPurpose
object_idstable unique identifier
object_typeType of ontology object
nameNormalized name
descriptionBrief and informative description
geo_idterritorial binding
time_from / time_toPeriod of fact
source_idData source
evidence_idproof/primary document
confidenceLevel of trust
ownerResponsible for data
relationsConnection with other objects
metricsindicators and values
access_classAccess Class
updated_atdate of last update

Other published edition: ATLAS SOCIAL DATA Architecture of observation, understanding and development of society EQUILIBRIUM Atlas_social_data_EQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx · web text +

DATA → RELATIONS → UNDERSTANDING → SOLUTION → ACTION → MEASURABLE EFFECT

1. Why do we need Atlas?

From scattered statistics to a holistic social picture

• Unified language of social data for the state, NGOs, business and citizens.

• Simultaneous display of problems, resources, performers and results.

• Early identification of social risks prior to transition to crisis.

• Evidence-based assessment of social projects and government measures.

• Support for targeted solutions and design of new services.

2. Atlas answers six questions

The main transition: from the description of the past to the system of actions

What's going on?

Where?

With who?

Why not?

What resources are available?

What action will produce the result?

3. 19 layers of social reality

Atlas is not built around one base, but around interconnected layers

1. Population

2. Families

3. Health

4. Education

5. Revenues

6. Employment

7. Housing

8. Culture

9. Sport

10. Young people

11. The older generation

12. Inclusion

13. Security

14. Ecology

15. Mobility

16. NPO

17. Social projects

18. Resources

19. The social effect

4. Unified Register of NGOs and Initiatives

Not a directory of organizations, but a map of the territory’s ability to solve problems

• NPO passport: status, team, geography, competence, experience.

• Project portfolio: goals, groups, budgets, partners, results.

• Funding and support history.

• Material and intangible resources.

• Needs of the NGO itself: personnel, premises, IT, partners, financing.

• Evidence profile: transparency, reporting, confirmed effect.

5. Needs map + resource map

Social analytics becomes an operational system of cooperation

NEEDS

RESOURCES

• type of problem

• Task Force

• geography

• urgency

• scale

• Confirmation

• Finance

• infrastructure

• specialists

• NPOs and Institutions

• Technologies and Data

• availability in time

6. Hypergraph of social connections

Basic Atlas presentation form

NPO

RESOURCES

PEOPLE

PROJECT

TERRITORIES

NEEDS

INDICATORS

7. Social passport of the territory

One screen for manager, NPO, investor and analyst

State of population

Key risks

Needs

Infrastructure

NPOs and performers

Financing

Dynamics of indicators

Projects and effect

8. Analytical regimes

Atlas should show not only "what is", but also "what to do"

Deficit map

Coverage map

Map of cooperation

Performance Map

Risk map

Capacity map

Scenario mode

One Solution Window

9. Platform architecture

10 Technology Layers

1. Sources and connectors

2. Unified data model

3. The Fact Depository

4. Count and Ontology

5. Quality and Origin

6. Analytics and Models

7. Cards and Dashboards

8. Project outline

9. API external services

10. Security and audit

10. The contour of trust and responsible work with data

Atlas should be useful without becoming a system of total observation

• Privacy by design and minimization of collected data.

• Separation of identification, analytical and public contours.

• Depersonalization and aggregation for public cards.

• Role access and logging actions.

• Transparent origin of data and calculation methods.

• No high-value decisions on an opaque rating only.

11. MVP: first working circuit

One region / group of municipalities + 5 Interconnected registries

NGOs and social organizations

Social projects

Needs and challenges

Resources and infrastructure

Indicators and results

• Territory map

• NPO/project search

• Comparison of need and resource

• Project Card

• Basic Dashboard Effect

12. 20 key screens

The Atlas interface should guide the user from the map to the solution

1. Main map

2. Passport of the region

3. Passport of the municipality

4. Map of NGOs

5. NPO Card

6. Project Map

7. Project Card

8. Map of needs

9. Need card

10. Resource map

11. Infrastructure

12. Social risks

13. Quality of life

14. Grants and funding

15. Partnerships graph

16. The Consortium Designer

17. Scenario forecast

18. Effect monitoring

19. Reporting Center

20. Search for solutions

13. Roadmap for deployment

From the pilot of NGOs to the national social infrastructure

Pilot

Connectivity

Analysis

Scaling

EQUILIBRIUM

1 region / 5 registers

API + External Platforms

Risks, Deficits and Efficiency

regions and industry contours

a Single Analytical Core

Social Data Atlas = public knowledge infrastructure and navigation system to measurable social outcome.

Published files

SFERA · Full published text

City of Events. SFERA Media

Source Status: Primary Document

The media system of the City of Events project

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/sfera-smi-gorod-sobytiy

Open on the site

Concept, architecture, editorial model and launch roadmap

Version 1.0 | 2026

1. Summary

"SFERA Media" is a media circuit of the "City of Events" project, which connects the poster, news, press center, editorial office, event register, media library, event map and archive of results into a single system of public communication.

The main task of SFERA media is to turn each significant event into a visible, verifiable and continued public fact: the event must be announced, highlighted, recorded, saved and built into the next development cycle.

SFERA media does not work as a regular news feed, but as a semantic edition of the City of Events. It shows people what is happening, explains the meaning of what is happening, helps the organizers to gather an audience, and partners to see the results.

Key Formula

CYCLE → EVENT → MEDIA-SLED → REGISTER → TRUST → DEVELOPMENT

The cycle sets the rhythm. The event makes sense. The media creates visibility and public attention. The register retains the fact. Trust is formed through a verifiable trace. Development occurs through the continuation of events in projects, partnerships and new initiatives.

2. Place SFERA Media in the architecture of the City of Events

The City of Events is a system for managing time, meanings and development through events. SFERA Media is its public voice, navigational shell and confidence building mechanism.

ContourPurposeRole SFERA Media
City of EventsCalendar, map, events, participants, venuesAnnouncement, coverage, fixation and promotion of events
City of KnowledgeLectures, schools, research, educational routesPublication of educational materials, interviews, digests, special projects
SFERASpace of initiatives, expertise and cooperationPublic showcase of initiatives, partners and results
EQUILIBRIUMSystem of observation, analysis, communication and balanceAnalytics, registers, indexes, evidence archive of events
Culture and cinemaFestivals, premieres, exhibitions, theaters, museumsCultural Agenda, Media Archive and International Communication

3. Mission and principles

Mission

SFERA media creates a single information environment where the events of the city, culture, knowledge, science, social initiatives and international cooperation receive a voice, image, evidence trail and continuation.

Principles

  • An event is more important than noise: publication should lead to understanding, participation, or action.
  • After the event, there should be a trace: text, photos, videos, results, decisions, contacts, the next step.
  • The media works not only with the fact, but also with the meaning: why the event is important for a person, a city and a country.
  • The editorial staff retains professional responsibility: AI helps, but does not replace the editor.
  • Each material should strengthen confidence in the system: clarity, verifiability, correctness, respect for participants.
  • The archive is not a repository of files; the archive is a memory of development and a base for future projects.

4. Target Audiences

AudienceWhat she needsWhat gives SFERA media
ResidentsUnderstand where to go and why to participatePoster, selections, routes, understandable event cards
OrganizersFind audience, partners and media supportEvent Cabinet, Press Packages, Publications, Reports
PlaygroundsFilling, reputation, flow of eventsSite cards, calendar, integration with the map
Media and BloggersAccess to verified information and materialsAccreditation, photobank, press releases, speakers database
Business and investorsSee live projects and entry pointsSpecial projects, analytics, reports, partner packages
State structuresUnderstand the agenda and results of initiativesRegisters, reporting, public archive, monitoring
International partnersGet a clear picture of cultural and business lifeMultilingual digests, register of international events

5. Functions SFERA Media

  1. Navigation: daily, weekly, monthly and seasonal picture of events.
  2. Lighting: announcements, reports, interviews, live broadcasts, photos and videos.
  3. Meaningful Assembly: Explaining the significance of an event and its relationship to a large cycle.
  4. Archiving: preservation of materials, decisions, participants and results.
  5. Coordination: connecting organizers, venues, partners, media and audience.
  6. Reputation: the formation of the image of the city as a space of culture, knowledge and development.
  7. Analytics: Assess coverage, interest, engagement, results, and follow-up.
  8. International communication: translation, collections, cultural diplomacy, partner publications.

6. Structure of media platform

6.1. Main portal

  • Main page: events of the day, main materials, map, collections, news.
  • Poster: filters by date, topic, place, audience, format and level of the event.
  • News: short publications about important events and changes in the agenda.
  • Reports: materials from the scene with photos, videos, quotes and results.
  • Interviews: organizers, experts, cultural figures, scientists, entrepreneurs.
  • Analytics: reviews of trends, month results, seasonal cycles, industry agendas.
  • Registers: events, venues, organizers, media, partners, speakers, cultural institutions.
  • Archive: media library, documents, photos, videos, post-releases, decisions, road maps.

6.2. Mobile and social shell

  • Telegram: quick announcements, collections, urgent changes, photos from the sites.
  • VK: mass community, photo albums, videos, discussions, urban groups.
  • RuTube / YouTube: video archive, broadcasts, interviews, documentary cycles.
  • Zen: Publicity, Reviews, Columns, Human History, and Cultural Routes.
  • Newsletters: weekly collections by interests, results of the month and invitations.
  • Podcasts: the voice of the city, conversations with the creators of events, project history.

7. Single Event Card

The event card is the base unit of the platform. It connects billboard, media, registry and archive.

Card BlockContents
IdentificationName, date, time, place, format, level, status
MeaningBrief description of why the event is important, to which cycle it belongs
OrganizationOrganizer, partners, platform, contacts, press service
ProgrammeSchedule, sections, speakers, moderators, registration
Media before the eventAnnouncement, press release, billboard, banners, interviews, teaser
Media during the eventBroadcast, photo, live-feed, quotes, short videos
Media after the eventFinal report, photo album, video, post-release, conclusions
ResultsSolutions, agreements, projects created, participants, next step
ArchiveDocuments, links, media publications, tags, trust index

8. Editorial model

8.1. Roles of editorial

RoleResponsibility
Editor-in-ChiefEditorial policy, quality, strategic themes, partnerships
Publishing EditorPublication plan, deadlines, release structure, tape control
Event EditorEvent cards, billboard, coordination of data with the organizers
CorrespondentsReports, interviews, news, visits to the sites
Photo/video teamShooting, editing, broadcasting, media library
SMM-editionSocial networks, short formats, communities, feedback
Media AnalystCoverage, engagement, interest cards, reports
Registry EditorChecking cards, classification, archive, event status
AI-editor/operatorDrafts, transcripts, digests, translations, link search

8.2. Event editing cycle

  1. Receiving an application or identifying an event in the calendar.
  2. Verification of basic data: date, place, organizer, program, contacts.
  3. Create an event card and initial announcement.
  4. Preparation of a press package and materials for partners.
  5. Publication in the poster and social channels.
  6. Coverage of the event on the site or remotely.
  7. Publication of results, photos, videos, quotes and decisions.
  8. Filling the archive and assigning the status of the event.
  9. Fixing the next step: project, meeting, application, partnership, repeat cycle.

9. Publication formats

StageFormats
Before the eventAnnouncement, why to go card, interview, press release, selection of speakers, teaser video
During the eventLive-report, photos from the site, short quotes, inclusions, broadcast, stories
After the eventFinal report, 5 conclusions, photo album, video recording, post-release, analytical review
The Long TrailDocumentary material, podcast, special project, case, educational module, archive page

Categories

  • "Today at SFERA" - daily navigation on the main events.
  • "Event of the Week" - a deep coverage of one key event.
  • "Event People" - interviews with organizers, creators, experts and partners.
  • "City of Knowledge" - lectures, schools, research, educational programs.
  • "Map of Culture" - museums, theaters, exhibitions, festivals, cinema and folk traditions.
  • “Archive of the Future” - materials that capture solutions and ideas for the next stage.
  • "SFERA cooperation" - partnerships, initiatives, projects, entry points.
  • "International Calendar" - events of BRICS, CIS, SCO, UNESCO and cultural diplomacy.

10. Press center SFERA Media

The press center is an operational hub for interaction with organizers, journalists, bloggers, partners and official structures.

  • Releases press releases, post-releases, and official news reports.
  • Organizes accreditation of media and bloggers for events.
  • Creates a photo bank and video bank of events.
  • It maintains a calendar of press approaches, press conferences and briefings.
  • Prepares media plans for key events.
  • Collects external media publications and generates coverage reports.
  • Creates templates for organizers and partners.

Standard media event package

  1. Brief description of the event.
  2. Full press release.
  3. Announcement for the site.
  4. Short text for social networks.
  5. Poster and banners.
  6. Photos of organizers and speakers.
  7. Biographies of participants.
  8. Program and timing.
  9. Quotes from the organizers.
  10. Contacts of the press service.
  11. Link to registration.
  12. Post-release after completion.

11. Registers and trust indices

SFERA media should become not only editorial, but also a registry system. The register turns the information flow into a verifiable trust infrastructure.

RegisterPurpose
Register of eventsA single database of events with dates, statuses, organizers and results
Register of sitesMuseums, theatres, houses of culture, universities, clusters, public spaces
Register of organizersOrganizations, funds, initiative groups, institutions, teams
Register of Media and BloggersMedia partners, accreditation, topics, audiences, contacts
Register of SpeakersExperts, moderators, teachers, cultural figures, entrepreneurs
Register of publicationsAll materials on the event: internal and external publications
Register of resultsDecisions, agreements, projects, initiatives, continuations

Event Statuses

  1. Claimed.
  2. Verified.
  3. Announced.
  4. Confirmed.
  5. Gone.
  6. Fixed.
  7. Has results.
  8. Continued by the project.
  9. Entered the Archives of the City of Events.

12. Product line SFERA Media

ProductDescriptionWho is useful
Playbill SFERASingle calendar of events with filters and collectionsResidents, guests, organizers
Event Media CardPublic event page with materials and resultsOrganizers, media, partners
Press officeTools for press releases, accreditation and photobankMedia, bloggers, press services
Digest of the WeekSelection of main events and materialsCitizens, partners, authorities
Archive of the futureLong-term media library of events, decisions and projectsResearchers, Schools, Museums, Managers
Map of eventsGeography of events, sites and cultural routesTourists, residents, organizers
Special ProjectsSeries of publications on the topics of culture, knowledge, future, cooperationPartners, business, development institutions
Media AnalyticsCoverage, engagement and results reportsOrganizers, investors, government agencies

13. AI in SFERA Media

AI is used as an editorial assistant and analytical tool. It speeds up text, video, registry, and data, but does not replace human responsibility.

  • Creation of drafts of announcements, press releases, event cards and digests.
  • Decoding interviews, lectures, round tables and broadcasts.
  • Selection of quotes, theses, decisions and next steps.
  • Translation of materials for international partners.
  • Find links between events, organizations, themes and cycles.
  • Formation of brief reports on participants, sites and initiatives.
  • Automatic preparation of media reports and performance indicators.

Critical rule: everything that is published on behalf of SFERA media passes editorial check. Trust is more expensive than speed.

14. Performance indicators

Indicator groupMetrics
CoverageViews, unique users, subscribers, audience geography
InvolvementComments, reposts, reactions, transitions, registrations
Quality of eventsNumber of confirmed cards, data completeness, availability of results
Media-trackPhotos, videos, publications, quotes, documents, external mentions
ContinuedNew partnerships, applications, projects, re-events, products created
TrustPercentage of verified events, correctness of data, absence of controversial publications
EconomySponsorship packages, special projects, subscriptions, press center services, advertising

15. Monetization and sustainability

SFERA Media should have a sustainable economic model, but not turn into an advertising board. Money should enhance the quality of the event environment, not destroy trust.

  • Partnership special projects with city, cultural, educational and business organizations.
  • Paid advanced promotion of events while maintaining transparent marking.
  • Press center services: press releases, media packages, photos, videos, broadcasts, reports.
  • Subscription for the organizers: event cabinet, analytics, extended card, archive.
  • Corporate and state digests by industries and territories.
  • Sponsorship rubrics and long-term thematic cycles.
  • Production of documentary materials, films, podcasts and educational courses.

16. Roadmap for launch

StageTimeframeResult
1. Conceptual Assembly0–2 weeksApproved mission, structure, rubrics, event card, basic statuses
2. MVP portal3–6 weeksPoster, news, event cards, application form, first registers
3. Launch of the editorial office6–8 weeksEditorial calendar, Telegram/VK, first interviews and reports
4. Press center2–3 monthsAccreditation, press packages, photobank, media and partners base
5. Register system3–4 monthsRegister of events, venues, organizers, publications and results
6. Media Analytics4–6 monthsDashboards, reports, trust indexes and event trace
7. Scaling6–12 monthsRegional contours, international digests, special projects, partner network

17. Pilot launch on 100 events

To test the model, it is proposed to run a pilot cycle for 100 events. The goal is not just to fill the calendar, but to work out the full path: application, verification, announcement, coverage, archive, result, the next step.

CategoryNumberExample
Culture20Exhibitions, concerts, festivals, theatrical events
Cinema10Premieres, film clubs, festivals, meetings with authors
Knowledge20Lectures, schools, conferences, educational intensives
Society15Forums, round tables, volunteer actions, public meetings
Ecology10Eco-actions, bio-censorship monitoring, planting, expeditions
Business and Cooperation10Business sessions, project presentations, partner meetings
Memory and heritage10Memorable dates, archival projects, meetings of generations
Future5Forsyths, strategic sessions, laboratories of the future

After 100 events, a report is formed: what formats worked, what audiences are active, what sites are strong, what topics require development, what events have continued.

18. Risks and quality protection

RiskProtection
Turning a portal into a chaotic posterUnified classification, editorial selection, event statuses
Information noisePriority of semantic materials and results, not just announcements
Invalid dataChecking the organizer, date, place, program and contact person
Weak archiveMandatory post-releases, photos, videos, solutions and next step
Loss of trust due to advertisingTransparent labeling of partner materials and editorial code
Burnout editorialTemplates, AI-assistant, download calendar, priorities by importance
Lack of continuation of eventsStatus "next step" as a mandatory card field

19. Manifesto SFERA Media

We create media not for noise, but for meaning.

We cover events not as random news, but as points of development of a person, a city, a culture and a country.

We believe that the event must be seen, understood, preserved and continued.

We connect organizers, participants, venues, partners, journalists and spectators into a single event environment.

We create an archive of the future, where every meaningful meeting, idea, decision and initiative gets its place.

We work with respect for facts, people and time.

SFERA Media is the voice of the City of Events, its memory, its map and its sequel.

20. Final formula

SFERA Media is a media system that turns events into public attention, trust, archive, partnership and development.

The main task is to ensure that no significant event disappears without a trace. Each event should receive a voice, an image, an evidentiary trace and the next step.

Event → Media → Register → Trust → Continuation.

Other published edition: SFERA Media SFERA_SMI_City_Sobytiy.pptx · Web Text +

Media-contour of the project "City of Events"

Concept · architecture · editorial model · roadmap launch

Event occurred → The media recorded → The society saw → archive saved → The project has developed

Version 1.0 · 2026

1. Main idea

Media as a system of fixation, trust and continuation of events

No ordinary news.

The event becomes a public fact

SFERA media works as a semantic edition of the City of Events: it shows people what is happening, explains the meaning of what is happening and helps the organizers bring the event to a result.

Each significant event receives an announcement, coverage, media trail, registry, archive and the next step. The event does not disappear after completion.

CYCLE → EVENT → MEDIA-SLED → REGISTER → TRUST → DEVELOPMENT

The cycle sets the rhythm

The event makes sense

Media creates visibility

The register maintains the fact

Trust arises from evidence.

Development leads to continuation

2. Place in architecture

SFERA Media — public voice, navigation envelope and trust mechanism

City

Knowledge

SFERA

Lectures, schools, research

Initiatives and cooperation

City

Events

EQUILIBRIUM

Calendar, map, events

Analytics, communications, balance

SFERA Media

Culture

and cinema

Partners

and Media

Festivals, premieres, archive

Accreditation and publications

3. Mission and principles

Unified information environment for events, culture, knowledge and cooperation

Mission

Create an environment where events of the city, culture, knowledge, science, social initiatives and international cooperation receive a voice, image, evidence trail and continuation.

More important than noise

After the event, there must be a trace.

Media works not only with the fact, but also with the meaning

AI helps but does not replace the editor

Trust is built on clarity and verifiability

Archive — memory of development, not file storage

4. Target Audiences

Each group has its own benefit and entry point

Residents

Organizers

Playgrounds

Media and Bloggers

Where to go and why participate

→ billboard, routes, collections

audience, partners, media

→ cabinet, press packages, reports

Completeness and reputation

→ cards, calendar, map

Access to verified information

→ accreditation, photobank, speaker database

Business and investors

State

International partners

Researchers

live projects and entry points

→ analytics, special projects, partner packages

Agenda and results of initiatives

→ registers, archive, monitoring

A clear picture of cultural life

→ Multilingual Digests

data, traces, connections

→ archive, registers, event maps

5. Functions SFERA Media

From Navigation to International Communication

Navigation

daily, weekly and seasonal picture of events

International communications

Lighting

translation, digests, cultural diplomacy

announcements, reports, interviews, broadcasts, photos and videos

Analysis

Responsive assembly

Media system

Trust

coverage, engagement, results, continuation

Why is the event important and which cycle it belongs to

Reputation

Archival

The city as a space of culture and development

preservation of materials, decisions, participants and outcomes

Coordination

Connecting organizers, venues, partners and audiences

6. Structure of media platform

Portal + social shell + archive + registers

Main portal

Mobile and social shell

Memory infrastructure

• Home: events of the day, materials, map

• Poster: filters by date, subject, place

• News and reports

• Interview and analytics

• Registers: events, venues, partners

• Archive: photos, videos, documents, decisions

• Telegram: quick announcements and changes

• VK: mass community and photo albums

• RuTube / YouTube: video archive and broadcasts

• Zen: Publicity and Routes

• Newsletters: compilations and results

• Podcasts: Voice of the City

• Event Media Card

• Mediateka

• Event map

• Organizer's office

• Press office

• Trust Reports and Indices

7. Single Event Card

Base unit: billboard + media + registry + archive

Identification

Meaning

Organization

Programme

name, date, place, format, status

Why is it important which cycle

organizer, partners, platform, contacts

schedule, sections, speakers, registration

Media to

Media during

Media after

Results

announcement, press release, billboard, interview

broadcast, photo, live-tape, quotes

results, video, post-release, conclusions

solutions, projects, next step, archive

The event card should record not only “what will happen”, but also “what is left after”.

8. Editorial model

Team and cycle of work with the event

Editor-in-Chief

Producing

Event Editor

policy, quality, partnerships

publication plan and tape control

cards, billboard, data matching

Correspondents

Photo/video

SMM

news, interviews, reports

shooting, editing, broadcasting

social networks, community, feedback

Analyst

Registry Editor

AI-operator

coverage, involvement, reports

Verification, classification, statuses

Drafts, transcripts, links

9. Publication formats

One Event Cycle - Four Media Layers

Before the event

During

After the event

The Long Trail

Announcement · "Why Go" card · Interview · Press Release · Selection of Speakers · teaser-video

Live-report · photos from the site · quotes · inclusions · broadcast · stories

Final report · 5 Conclusions · Photo Album · video recording · post-release · review

Documentary · podcast · special project · case · educational module · archive

Rule: Every important event must leave a minimum of 10 media traces.

10. Press center SFERA Media

Operational node of interaction with organizers, journalists and partners

Tasks of the press center

Standard media package

• Press releases, post releases and official communications

• Accreditation of media and bloggers

• Photobank and videobank of events

• Calendar of press approaches and briefings

• Mediaplans for key events

• Collection of external publications and coverage reports

• Brief description and full press release

• Announcement for site and social networks

• Poster, banners, photos of speakers

• Participants' biographies

• Program and timing

• Quotes from the organizers

• Press service contacts

• Registration and post-release

11. Registers and trust indices

Register turns information flow into trust infrastructure

Register of events

Register of sites

Register of organizers

Register of Media and Bloggers

Register of Speakers

Register of publications

Register of results

Event Statuses

Declared

Verified

Announced

Verified

Past

Fixed

Has results

Continued by the project

Entered the archive

Trust arises when an event has a proven data, media footprint, outcome, and next step.

12. Product line

A set of services for residents, organizers, media, partners and institutions

Playbill SFERA

Media card

Press office

Digest of the Week

Single Event Calendar with Filters

public event page with the results

press releases, accreditation, photobank

main events and materials

Archive of the future

Map of events

Special Projects

Media Analytics

Long-Term Media Library of Solutions

Geography of sites and routes

series of materials on topics

Reports on coverage and results

13. AI and performance indicators

AI accelerates the work, but the responsibility remains with the editorial staff

AI in redaction

Metrics

• Drafts of announcements, press releases and cards

• Decoding interviews, lectures and broadcasts

• Selection of quotations, theses, decisions

• Translation of materials for international partners

• Search for links between events and organizations

• Automatic preparation of media reports

Critical rule: everything published passes editorial check.

• Coverage: views, users, geography

• Involvement: reactions, transitions, registrations

• Quality of events: card occupancy and availability of results

• Media trail: photos, videos, publications, documents

• Continuation: partnerships, applications, projects

• Trust: percentage of events verified

• Economics: special projects, services, subscriptions

14. Monetization and sustainability

The economy should enhance the quality of the event environment, not destroy trust

Special Projects Partners

Advanced Promotion

Press center services

with cultural, educational and business organizations

transparent marking and editorial rules

press releases, photos, videos, broadcasts, reports

Organizers' subscription

Digests for organizations

Production of content

event cabinet, analytics, extended card

sectoral and territorial collections

documentary materials, podcasts, courses

Trust is more expensive than speed and more expensive than advertising revenue.

15. Roadmap for launch

From concept to regional and international network

0–2 weeks

Conceptual Assembly

mission, structure, rubrics, card, statuses

3–6 weeks

MVP portal

billboard, news, application form, first registers

6–8 weeks

Launch of the editorial office

calendar, Telegram/VK, first interviews and reports

2–3 months

Press center

accreditation, press packages, photobank

3–4 months

Register system

events, venues, organizers, publications, results

4–6 months

Media Analytics

dashboards, reports, trust indexes

6–12 months

Scaling

regional contours, international digests, special projects

16. Pilot on 100 events

Full path check: application → check → announcement → Lighting → archive → Result

Culture

Knowledge

Society

Cinema

Ecology

Business

Memory

Future

Pilot's result

report on formats, audiences, strong platforms, development topics and events that have given continuity.

17. Manifesto SFERA Media

Voice, memory, map and continuation of the City of Events

We create media not for noise, but for meaning.

The event must be seen, understood, preserved and continued.

We connect organizers, participants, venues, partners, journalists and spectators.

We are creating an archive of the future, where every meaningful meeting, idea and initiative gets its place.

SFERA Media is a media system that turns events into attention, trust, partnership and development.

Event → Media → Register → Trust → Continuation

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

EARTH. THE EQUILIBRIUM GLOBAL AEROSPACE SYSTEM, GASMP

Source Status: Primary Document

Planetary system of monitoring, forecasting

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/gasmp-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

and Early Warning

EARTH • MAN • FUTURE GENERATIONS

Strategic concept

Version 1.0

EQUILIBRIUM — SFERA — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA

Passport Concept

ParameterContents
NameGlobal Aerospace Monitoring and Forecasting System "EQUILIBRIUM"
Brief designationGASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”
PurposeEarly detection of planetary, natural, man-made, biological and space threats; forecasting their development; coordination of warning and response.
ScaleLocal → municipal → regional → national → transboundary → planetary
Basic principleSee you sooner. To be precise. Warn in time. Act together. Restoring balance.
Target UsersStates, international organizations, research centres, response services, companies, territories and citizens.
Document statusConceptual basis. Technical, legal and financial parameters are subject to verification during the pre-project stage.

EQUILIBRIUM is a planetary early warning system combining aerospace observation, artificial intelligence, scientific forecasting, and international cooperation to protect the Earth, humans, and future generations.

Executive summary

The world has thousands of satellites, sensors, scientific models and departmental platforms, but these resources remain divided by country, industry and type of threat. SASMP "EQUILIBRIUM" forms a supersystem of compatibility: it does not replace national systems, but connects them through unified protocols of trust, validation and response.

The central result is a continuous digital circuit "observation" → recognition → forecast → Warning → Resource mobilization → Action → Recovery → confirmed result." The system converts disparate data into verifiable scenarios and specific management decisions.

Strategic effectPractical result
Transition from reaction to preventionReducing the time of threat detection and cost of consequences.
A unified picture of the planetCompatible digital twin of Earth and near-Earth space.
Scientific evidenceTraceability of data, models, forecasts and solutions.
Sovereign cooperationExchange of necessary indicators without loss of control over the source data.
PerformanceAutomatic linking of forecast with responsible, resources and action plan.

1. Reasons for creation

Modern threats develop faster than administrative cycles and are rarely confined to a single industry or border. Climate anomalies affect water, crop, migration and energy; space weather - on communication, navigation and energy networks; man-made accidents - on ecosystems and public health.

  • Fragmentation of observations and incompatibility of departmental data.
  • Lack of connection between scientific forecasting and management action.
  • Later detection of weak signals and cascade risks.
  • Lack of a unified system of trust in sources, models and warnings.
  • The gap between threat assessment, resource mobilization and outcome control.

STRATEGIC TRANSITION From incident cataloguing to probability management; from individual sensors to holistic observation; from departmental response to intersystem cooperation.

2. Mission, purpose and principles

Mission. Preserving planetary balance through timely knowledge, collective intelligence, and concerted action.

Purpose. Build a trusted global infrastructure capable of continuously assessing the state of the Earth and near-Earth space, warning of evolving threats and launching measurable preventive measures.

PrincipleContents
PreventionPriority of prevention over elimination of consequences.
IntegrityJoint analysis of nature, technosphere, man and space.
ScienceVerifiable data, models and uncertainty assessment.
SovereigntyOwner control over source data and access modes.
FederalityConnectivity without the mandatory centralization of all arrays.
ResponsibilityEach signal has an owner, time, action and result.
EthicsProtection of human rights, prevention of discrimination and abuse.

3. Monitoring objects

ContourKey objects and phenomena
Atmosphere and climateTemperature, precipitation, aerosols, greenhouse gases, cyclones, droughts, fire hazard.
HydrosphereOceans, rivers, reservoirs, glaciers, floods, water quality and availability.
LithosphereEarthquakes, volcanoes, landslides, karst, subsidence, deformation of structures.
BiosphereForests, soils, biodiversity, state of biocenoses, plant and animal diseases.
TechnosphereEnergy, industry, transport, dams, pipelines, critical infrastructure.
Humanitarian OutlineEpidemics, food and water risks, migration, access to assistance.
Near-Earth spaceSolar activity, radiation, space debris, dangerous encounters, asteroids.

4. Multilevel surveillance system

LevelFundsPurpose
SpaceERS satellites, weather apparatus, optical and radar systemsGlobal overview and long-term series.
StratosphericAerostats, high-altitude UAVs, pseudo-satellitesProlonged regional surveillance.
AviationAircraft laboratories, UAVs, helicoptersDetailed and operational intelligence.
MarineBuoys, vessels, underwater stations and autonomous vehiclesOceans, seas, shelf and underwater environment.
GroundRadars, stations, seismic networks, IoT sensorsContinuous Local Dimension.
BiosphereBiocenose monitoring pointsObserving ecosystems as living complexes.
SocialRegisters, appeals, statistics, dispatching systemsAssessing vulnerability and need for assistance.

5. Intelligent Core EQUILIBRIUM

The intellectual core combines space-time data, digital twins, physical models, machine learning, and expert knowledge. It does not replace a specialist: recommendations are accompanied by sources, an assessment of confidence and an explanation of factors.

  1. Collection and normalization of data flows.
  2. Detection of anomalies and weak signals.
  3. Recognition of cause-effect and cascade relationships.
  4. Simulation of scenarios and digital experiments.
  5. Estimation of probability, scale, horizon and expected damage.
  6. Formation of warnings and sets of preventive measures.
  7. Feedback on the actual outcome and further training of models.

FORMULA FORECAST Event + Probability + horizon + Territory + Impact scale + Confidential interval + Data sources + Recommended Action.

6. The Digital Twin of Earth

The digital twin of the Earth is a dynamic model of the state of natural, infrastructure and social systems. It is built as a federation of national and sectoral twins, linked by a single metadata and temporal-spatial binding.

LayerContents
GeophysicalRelief, geology, seismics, hydrology, atmosphere.
EnvironmentalBiocenoses, ecosystem services, pollution, natural capital.
InfrastructureEnergy, transport, communications, industry, social facilities.
ResourceWater, food, raw materials, reserves, response capacity.
ScenarioHistory of events, forecast branches, consequences of decisions.
ManagementResponsible, regulations, resources, execution status.

7. Horizons and forecasting scenarios

HorizonPeriodKey decisions
OperationalMinutes — 72 hoursAlert, evacuation, localization, protection of infrastructure.
Short-term3–30 daysRedistribution of resources, modes of readiness, logistics.
Medium-term1–12 monthsSeed solutions, water and energy balance, prevention.
Strategic1–10 yearsInfrastructure investments, adaptation of territories, standards.
Civilizing10–100 yearsScenarios of settlement, climate, resources, and planetary sustainability.

For each significant risk, at least five branches are formed: inertial, unfavorable, critical, manageable and targeted recovery. Branches are recalculated when new data is received.

8. Early Warning Contour

StageResultResponsible contour
1. MonitoringMeasurement and message streamsData operators and sensor networks.
2. IdentificationAnomaly or weak signalAI-core and analytical centers.
3. VerificationConfirmed Assessment and UncertaintyScientific and accredited centers.
4. WarningAddress message with prioritySituation centers.
5. DecisionSelected scenario and action planAuthorized body.
6. ImplementationMobilized forces and resourcesECO-PPA and SPECZASHCHITA.
7. MonitoringMeasurable Impact and LessonsEQUILIBRIUM and independent validation.

9. Threat levels and action protocols

LevelCharacteristicMode
GreenBackground; deviations within acceptable limits.Monitoring and updating of baselines.
YellowPersistent weak signal or increasing uncertainty.Enhanced monitoring and expert verification.
OrangeHigh probability of a significant event.Training of forces, reserves and targeted warning.
RedThe event is inevitable or is already developing.Immediate response and inter-agency coordination.
PurpleCross-border or planetary cascade risk.International Protocol of Joint Action.

The threshold of transition between levels is set separately for each type of threat and territory. The automated system can initiate verification and distribute a technical signal, but decisions affecting citizens’ rights and sovereign powers are made by authorized people.

10. Management system

OrganFunction
International Supervisory BoardPrinciples, trust, balance of interests and international legitimacy.
The Scientific and Forecasting CouncilMethodologies, models, independent expertise and ethics of science.
Global Situation CentrePlanetary picture, cross-border risks and coordination.
National nodesSovereign management of data, warnings and responses.
Regional centresLocal detail and interaction of services.
Validation CentersConfirmation of data quality, models, forecasts and results.
Infrastructure operatorsOperation of satellites, UAVs, communication networks and sensors.

11. Data Sovereignty and Trust

The architecture is built on the principle of federative analytics: sensitive arrays can remain with the owner, and the allowed indicators, models, proof of origin and warnings are transferred to the general outline.

Access ClassExampleManagement
OpenPublic maps, basic indexes, educational data.Open licenses and machine-readable interfaces.
ProfessionalDetailed scientific and industry sets.Registration, licensing, use agreements.
InteragencyOperational data for management.Role access, logging, secure channels.
SovereignNational arrays and models of critical objects.Storage and calculations in the national contour.
of particular importanceData whose disclosure poses a security risk.Isolated contours and special regulations.
  • Unchangeable log of origin and transformation of data.
  • Cryptographic identification of sources and participants.
  • Quality assessment: completeness, timeliness, accuracy, consistency.
  • Versioning of models and reproducibility of calculations.
  • Independent audit of algorithms and a mechanism for appealing decisions.

12. Scientific Validation and Evidence

The forecast is considered managerially suitable only after passing the established level of verification. The depth of validation depends on the urgency and potential damage: with an immediate threat, an accelerated mode is allowed with a mandatory subsequent audit.

Object of verificationCriteria
DataOrigin, calibration, spatio-temporal accuracy, omissions.
ModelPurpose, scope, quality of training, sustainability.
ForecastProbability, uncertainty interval, alternatives, retrospective accuracy.
RecommendationProportionality, feasibility, side effects, responsible person.
ResultActual effect, cost, preventable damage, lessons.

13. Ecosystem Integration EQUILIBRIUM

ElementRole in GASMP
EQUILIBRIUMSurveillance, digital twin, forecasting, control and balance.
SFERAA common space of initiatives, communications and public participation.
ECO-PPAMobilization of public and private resources for confirmed tasks.
SPECZASHCHITACooperative organization of project consortia and practical implementation.
Biocenose pointsGround-based network of holistic observations of local ecosystems.
ESG-IRImpact measurement, evidence and sustainability rating.
EUTUnified protocols, registries, technological compatibility and human balance.

THROUGH THE PROCESS Signal → Verified threat → Initiative → Expertise → Co-operation → resource support → Pilot → Confirmed result → Scaling.

14. Products & Services

  • Planetary map of risks and early signals.
  • Digital twin of Earth and near-Earth space.
  • Passports of stability of states, regions, cities and objects.
  • Forecasts of crop, water, fires, floods, epidemics and infrastructure risks.
  • Targeted warning service for the population and organizations.
  • Register of warnings, decisions, executors and confirmed results.
  • Marketplace of data, models, sensors and analytical services.
  • Insurance, investment and compensation products based on verified data.
  • International Bank for Reconstruction Scenarios and Best Practices

15. Financial and economic model

GASM creates a public good, but requires a sustainable mixed funding model. Basic infrastructure is provided by states and international programs; application services - subscriptions, contracts, insurance and investment mechanisms; scientific and humanitarian directions - grants and trust funds.

SourcePurpose
Government programsNational infrastructure, security, research and preparedness.
International fundsCross-border contours, common standards, assistance to vulnerable territories.
PPPs and concession modelsSatellite, sensor, computing and telecommunications infrastructure.
Corporate contractsMonitoring of facilities, supply chains and industry risks.
Insurance mechanismsParametric products, damage reduction and prevention financing.
ECO-PPAAttracting resources to confirmed environmental and infrastructure results.

Part of the confirmed prevented damage can be directed to the development of infrastructure for the prevention and restoration of natural capital - only after legal and financial verification of the methodology.

16. International cooperation

The system should develop as an open cooperation architecture compatible with existing national and international mechanisms. The partnership is built around specific public goods: disaster prevention, climate monitoring, ocean protection, space security, and the sustainability of critical infrastructure.

  • Intergovernmental Agreement on Principles and Regimes of Exchange.
  • General catalog of data, models and computing services.
  • Joint cross-border training and exercises.
  • Mutual recognition of validation centers and methodologies.
  • Mechanism of emergency provision of images, communication and computing power.
  • Training program and open scientific cooperation.

17. Ethical and legal safeguards

RiskWarranty
Mass surveillance of peopleMinimization of personal data, legitimate purpose, proportionality and supervision.
Algorithmic discriminationTesting biases, explicability, and the right to review by a person.
False alarmsThreshold models, multi-source verification and uncertainty indication.
Hiding dangerous informationMandatory protocols for disclosure of cross-border threats and audit.
Military or Unfair UseSeparation of civilian contours, access control and international guarantees.
Dependence on one operatorOpen standards, portability and redundancy of critical functions.

18. Cybersecurity and continuity

  • A zero-trust architecture with minimal powers.
  • Geographically distributed reservation of centers and communication channels.
  • Protection of the supply chain of software and hardware.
  • Detection of sensor data substitution and attacks on artificial intelligence models.
  • Manual and autonomous backup modes for critical warnings.
  • Regular cyber exercises, recovery verification and independent audit.

19. Key performance indicators

GroupExamples of indicators
CoverageThe proportion of land, population, ecosystems and critical objects under observation.
TimelinessAverage time from signal to confirmation, warning and decision.
QualityPredict accuracy, false alarm rate, probability calibration.
ImplementationProportion of warnings with a designated responsible and closed action plan.
EffectPrevented damage, saved lives, area of restored ecosystems.
TrustThe proportion of proven sources, replicable models and successfully passed audits.
ResilienceAvailability of services, recovery time, reservation of critical functions.

20. Road map of creation

StageTimeframeResult
0. Pre-project0–6 monthsConsortium, legal model, architecture, data catalog, pilot selection.
1. Pilot region6–18 monthsIntegration of satellites, UAVs, biocenose points and situational center; 3–5 threat scenarios.
2. National outline18–36 monthsA federal network of departments, industries, research centers and operators.
3. Outline of partners3–5 yearsCross-border polygons, mutual validation, common exercises and services.
4. Planetary system5–10 yearsGlobal digital twin, round-the-clock situational contour and scaling.

Priorities of the first 100 days

  1. Approve the initiating council and project office.
  2. Form a passport of the pilot territory and a list of threats.
  3. Take inventory of available data, sensors, satellite services and models.
  4. Identify five measurable early warning scenarios.
  5. Develop protocols for exchange, validation, classification and response.
  6. Prepare a feasibility study and a financial model of the pilot.
  7. Launch a demonstration situation screen and the first interdepartmental exercise.

21. Recommended Pilot

It is advisable to build a pilot around one geographically integral territory, where natural, infrastructural and social risks are simultaneously presented. The minimum contour should include: flood or fire; water and air quality; critical infrastructure stability; biocenose monitoring; and population targeted warning.

Readiness parameterLaunch criterion
ManagementThe customer, operator, scientific supervisor and response services are determined.
DataAt least three independent source classes for key scenarios.
InfrastructureSecure integration platform and backup alert channel.
MethodologyFixed baselines, thresholds, quality metrics and validation protocol.
ImplementationTraining was conducted, resources and deadlines were assigned.
Public trustThe goals, restrictions, data protection rules and feedback channel have been published.

22. Solutions needed to start

  1. To recognize GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM" as a priority initiative of planetary security and sustainable development.
  2. Establish an inter-agency and international working group.
  3. Identify the pilot area and five priority scenarios.
  4. Approve the principles of sovereignty, ethics, validation and data exchange.
  5. Forming a project consortium EQUILIBRIUM — SFERA — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA.
  6. Prepare the technical specification, feasibility study, financial and legal model.
  7. Run the demonstration circuit within 12 months after pre-project approval.

The final positioning of the EQUILIBRIUM system is not yet another observation system, but a connecting architecture of planetary responsibility: it turns data into knowledge, knowledge into a timely solution, and decision into a confirmed result.

Conclusion

Humanity already possesses most of the necessary means: aerospace platforms, sensor networks, computing power, scientific models and response institutes. The main deficit is not a separate technology, but a trusted connection between observation, prognosis and action.

GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM" offers such connectivity. Its creation forms a new culture of security: threats are identified before the transition to disaster, resources are mobilized on the basis of evidence, and the result is assessed on the basis of saved lives, the stability of territories and restored balance.

SEE BEFORE • UNDERSTAND EXACTLY • ACTING COMMUNICATIONS

Other published edition: GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM" GASMP_EQUILIBRIUM_Presentation.pptx · Web Text +

Planetary system for monitoring, forecasting and early warning

LAND

Land • Man • Future generations

Strategic presentation | 2026

The system turns surveillance into action

MAIN IDEA

Not just another data source, but a connecting architecture of planetary responsibility

OBSERVATION

UNDERSTANDING

TREASURE

ACTION

RESULT

Data from Earth and Space

AI + scientific models

Risk, place, time

Resources and implementers

Restored Balance

See before • Understand more precisely • Warn in time • Act together

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Threats are linked - surveillance systems are fragmented

WHY NOW

Energy

Climate

CASCADE

RISK

Infrastructure

Water

Health

One anomaly triggers effects in several industries and territories.

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Seven levels create a single picture of the planet

ARCHITECTURE OF OBSERVATION

Kosmos

Remote sensing satellites, weather apparatus, orbital stations

STRATOSPHERE

Aerostats, high-altitude UAVs, pseudo-satellites

AVIATION

Aircraft laboratories, UAVs, helicopters

SEA

Buoys, vessels, underwater stations and apparatus

LAND

Radars, seismic networks, stations, IoT sensors

BIOSPHERE

Biocenose monitoring points

SOCIETY

Registers, dispatch and social data

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Earth becomes a measurable system of interconnections

DIGITAL DOUBLE

Geophysics

relief • atmosphere • water

Ecology

biocenoses • pollution • natural capital

Infrastructure

Power Engineering • Transport • Communication

LIVE

BALANCE

Resources

• power reserves • availability

Scripts

history • predictions • consequences

Management

Responsible • actions • status

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

AI strengthens the expert, not replaces the responsibility

INTELLECTUAL NUCLEAR

Assemble

Learn

Verify

EQUILIBRIUM

Warn

Detect

Simulate

Each prediction: probability • horizon • area • scale • uncertainty • action

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Seven contours cover nature, the technosphere and space

MONITORING OBJECTS

ATMOSPHERE

HYDROSPHERE

cyclones • droughts • fires

Oceans • Floods • Water

LITOSPHERE

BIOSPHERE

seismic • volcanoes • landslides

Forest • Soil • biodiversity

TECHNOSPHERE

HUMANITARIAN

power engineering • transport • objects

epidemic • food • migration

SPACE

Sun • radiation • debris • asteroids

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Five Horizons Link Operational Solutions to Strategy

FORECASTING

MINUTES — 72 H

3–30 DAYS

1–12 MES.

1–10 YEARS

10–100 YEARS

Warning

and protection

Readiness

and logistics

Water, harvest,

prevention

Investments

and adaptation

Civilizational

scenarios

Inertial • Unfavorable • Critical • Managed • Targeted

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Each signal has an owner, time and action.

Early warning

SIGNAL

ANOMALY

VERIFICATION

TREASURE

DECISION

EXECUTIVE.

CONTROL

ECO-PPA mobilizes resources

SPECZASHCHITA forms project consortia

EQUILIBRIUM confirms the result

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Global coordination does not negate national sovereignty

GOVERNANCE

INTERNATIONAL

OBSERVER COUNCIL

The Scientific and Forecasting Council

Global Situation Centre

Validation Centers

Infrastructure operators

NATIONAL AND REGIONAL Knots

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Sensitive data remains with the owner

DATA AND TRUST

SOVEREIGN

CONTOUR

GENERAL

CONTOUR

AUTHORIZED INDICATORS • MODELS • WARNINGS

Federated analytics

Verified origin

Role-based access

Versioning of models

Unchanged log

Independent audit

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

The four contours connect knowledge, participation, resources and execution

UNIFORM ECOSYSTEM

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

observation • forecast • control

Initiatives • Communication • Participation

Mobilization of public and private resources

• consortia • execution

Biocenose points • ESG-IR • Unified Technologies

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

The system produces solutions that can be used

PRACTICAL RESULT

Planetary Risk Map

Forecasts of water, crop and fires

The Digital Twin of Earth

Register of actions and results

Territory Sustainability Passports

Data and Models Marketplace

Address warning

Insurance and investment products

The main product is a confirmed ability to prevent damage before the disaster.

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Prevented damage becomes measurable result

ECONOMY OF WARNING

PUBLIC

PROGRAMMES

INTERNATIONAL

FUNDS

PPP I

INFRASTRUCTURE

CORPORATE AND

INSURANCE SERVICES

ECO-PPA: RESOURCES UNDER CONFIRMED RESULT

Methods of calculation of the prevented damage require legal and financial verification.

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Planetary system starts with a measurable pilot

ROAD MAP

0–6 months

6–18 months

18–36 months

3–5 years

5–10 years

PREPROJECT

PILOT

NATIONAL CONTOUR

PARTNER CONTOUR

PLANETARY SYSTEM

consortium • architecture • feasibility study

Territory • 3–5 threats • teachings

Department • Industry • Science

Cross-border polygons

Digital Double • 24/7

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

The pilot must prove the warning, execution and effect

FIRST START

Flooding or natural fire

Water and air quality

Scenario

Sustainability of critical infrastructure

Biocenous monitoring

Targeted public warning

The goal of the pilot is to obtain the confirmed prevented damage and a ready scale model.

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Create a project office and launch a pre-project of GASMP

SOLUTION FOR START

12

MES.

Identify pilot territory and five threats

Approve the principles of sovereignty and validation

Form a consortium EQUILIBRIUM — SFERA — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA

Prepare the technical specification, feasibility study and financial model

Run the demonstration circuit within 12 months

See you sooner. To be precise. Act together.

GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”

Sources cited in presentation 1

  • GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM". Strategic Concept, Version 1.0, 23 August 2026.

Published files

SFERA · Full published text

MESTO. Unified System for Storing Valuables

Source Status: Primary Document

From the storeroom next to the house to the digital infrastructure for managing personal and business assets

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/mesto-edinaya-sistema-khraneniya-tsennostei

Open on the site

B2C + B2B • Access 24/7 • Digital Storage Passport • Modular Network

The basis: the original business model of the project "Place". Market and financial indicators from the source are considered as preliminary project guidelines and require updating for the selected city and object.

1. System summary

“Place” is a distributed network of automated spaces in which physical storage is associated with digital accounting, value categorization, security, movement services and access rights management.

Unified Logic:

StageSystem operationResult
1. IdentificationThe client describes the object or uploads photos and documents.Primary object card.
2. EvaluationValue, recoverability, risks and frequency of access are determined.Storage class A-F.
3. AppointmentBoxing, climate, safety, packaging and insurance are selected.Personal storage mode.
4. ReceptionState, completeness, owner and rights are fixed.Digital passport and act.
5. StorageThere are access control, environment monitoring and event logs.Traceability 24/7.
6. UseIssuance, delivery, temporary access, transfer or lease.Value is back in circulation.
7. ConclusionExtension, transfer, sale, inheritance, processing.Managed exit from storage.

2. Categories of value

The category answers the question "what is stored", and the class - "how critical is the loss". A single object can fall into several categories at the same time.

CategoryExamplesBasic mode
PersonalDocuments, family items, everyday life itemsPersonal boxing, restricted access
LegalOriginal contracts, certificates, archivesSafe module, access log
FinancialSecurities, collectible assets, key carriersDepository regime, double control
MaterialFurniture, machinery, tires, toolsStandard or Reinforced Box
IntelligentPrototypes, developments, documentation, data carriersIsolated circuit, NDA, copy control
CommercialCommodity balances, packaging, equipmentBusiness box, traffic accounting
CulturalArt, collections, manuscripts, family archiveClimatic and museum regime
HistoricalChronicles, photos, memorable itemsLong-term archival storage
BiologicalSeeds and acceptable biomaterialsSpecialized object for a separate regulation
StrategicCritical holdings, back-up documentationDistributed and insurance storage
SocialArchives of Communities, Organizations and ProjectsCollective rights and trusteeship
PotentialDrafts, ideas, unidentified and controversial objectsQuarantine and revaluation

3. Criticality classes A to F

ClassMeaningAdmissibility of lossMinimum mode
A is criticalUnique or vital valueUnacceptableIsolated storage, double identification, insurance copy/duplication
B - StrategicLosses have serious consequences.Practically unacceptableReinforced zone, environment control, insurance, transaction log
C is significantRecovery is possible, but expensive or longLowProtected box, inventory, photo fixation
D - OperatingNeeded for current life or businessAverageStandard boxing and basic control
E - TemporaryValue is limited by time or eventElevatedFlexible rate, notification of revision
F is zero/negativeNot used or creates costs and risksNot applicableTransfer, sale, recycling or safe disposal

4. Passport of Value

Each storage unit receives a digital card associated with the cell, contract and event log.

Data BlockRequired fields
IdentificationID, Name, Category, Photo, Marking/QR or RFID
RightOwner, user, trustees, grounds of ownership
EvaluationDeclared value, class A-F, uniqueness, recoverability
StateComplete set, defects, packaging, date of admission
EnvironmentTemperature, humidity, light, fire and sanitary restrictions
AccessRoles, schedule, two-factor verification, temporary permissions
ResponsibilityLiability limit, insurance, exclusions, evidence
Life CycleTerm, reminders, issuance, relocation, reassessment, completion

5. Mode assignment matrix

The decision is made on a set of five parameters: criticality, sensitivity to the environment, attractiveness for theft, legal limitations and frequency of access.

ProfileModel objectsModeService
BasicSeasonal items, furniture, tiresDry boxing, video surveillanceSelf-access 24/7
ComfortClothing, books, equipmentWarm zone, humidity controlPackaging and delivery
BusinessGoods, tools, archiveAccounting for entry/exit, roles of employeesAcceptance of supplies, equipment
ValuedCollections, documents, expensive equipmentReinforced zone, 2FA, individual alarmInventory, photo fixation, insurance
ArchivalDocuments and cultural materialsClimate control, rare accessDigitization, indexing
StandbyStocks and emergency kitsDisplaced points, control of shelf lifeRotation and Notifications

6. Architecture of a single system

LevelPurposeKey elements
1. ClientStorage ManagementApplication, catalogue of things, booking, payment, access
2. ObjectPhysical securityBoxes, locks, ACS, cameras, sensors, fire protection
3. OperationExecution of processesCRM/WMS, personnel assignments, incidents, maintenance
4. TrustworthyEvidencePassports, acts, event logs, electronic consents
5. SetevaManage multiple objectsUniform standards, network loading, dynamic pricing
6. PartnerService expansionLogistics, insurance, packaging, evaluation, marketplaces
7. AnalyticalSolutions and developmentDemand, load, risks, LTV/CAC, forecasting

7. Client scenarios

Home and family

  • Seasonal storage with calendar reminders.
  • Transfer or repair with delivery and temporary tariff.
  • Family archive with appointment of trustees.

Small business

  • Micro warehouse with access to several employees by roles.
  • Accounting of commodity balances and the supply acceptance log.
  • Scaling the area without changing the long-term contract.

Valuable and rare objects

  • Preliminary assessment of environmental and safety requirements.
  • State photo fixation and sealing.
  • Insurance and issuance only under the enhanced scenario.

8. Object operating model

ProcessStandardCheckpoint
ReservationsOnline volume and mode selectionConfirmed order parameters
OnboardingIdentification, contract, rules of prohibited itemsActivated access profile
AppointmentsInspection of the external condition, an inventory at the selected tariffSigned digital act
AccommodationTargeted use of box/cellObject and location ID connection
OperationControl of access, environment and paymentsContinuous log of events
IncidentSignal, localization, notification, documentationClosed report and corrective measures
ExtraditionAuthorization and status verificationReturn/partial issue
ReleaseAccess closure, inspection, cleaning, boxing readinessNew accessibility status

9. Security and trust

Protection is built in layers; failure of a single layer should not allow direct access to value.

  • Perimeter: lighting, video surveillance, security alarm and response regulations.
  • Access: Personal ID, electronic lock, two-factor verification for classes A-B.
  • Environment: temperature, humidity, smoke, leaks and power supply sensors.
  • Data: role delineation, encryption, backup and logging.
  • Responsibility: clear admission rules, a list of prohibited objects, limits and insurance options.
  • Continuity: communications and power reserve, emergency access, evacuation and recovery plans.

10. Product line and tariffs

ProductValue for the clientThe basis of tariff
PLACE StartMinimum amount near the houseVolume + term
PLACE ComfortWarm and dry storage of sensitive thingsVolume + climate
LOCATION BusinessMicro warehouse with command accessArea + transactions + users
LOCATION ArchiveLong term and structured inventoryVolume + term + indexing
PLACE ValueEnhanced protection and evidenceRisk class + service + insurance
VENUE MoveRepair/removal kitPackage: shipping + packing + storage
RESERVE PLACEDistributed stock in several locationsVolume + rotation + geography

Additional revenue: packing, delivery, loading, insurance, inventory, digitization of archives, receiving deliveries, completing orders, selling / transferring unclaimed items on a separate order.

11. Economic model

The original model looks at the object around 300 m², Of which approximately 220 m² They are surrendered. At the landmark 3 400 ₽/m² per month and download 84% The estimated revenue is about 628 thousands. ₽ per month. These are not confirmed indicators of the current enterprise, but a hypothesis for testing.

IndicatorReference pointWhat to check before launch
Investmentsnear 3,0 million ₽Estimate of partitions, locks, fire system, IT and reserves
Revenue600–650 thousands. ₽/month.Real rate of the district, mix of sizes, discounts and VAT
Expenditure350–470 thousands. ₽/month.Rental, personnel, utilities, security, software, marketing
Operating profit150–250 thousands. ₽/month.Filling, delay, commissions, repairs and taxes
Payback15–24 monthsDownload scenarios 60/75/85% and cost of capital

12. Management indicators

ContourKey indicators
DemandLeads by radius, conversion, cost of attraction, share B2B
FillingLoading area and volume, occupancy by size, rental period
EconomyRevenue on m², ARPU, LTV/CAC, Margin of service, delay
OperationsCheck-in time, number of manual operations, simple boxing, SLA applications
SecurityIncidents, false alarms, access violations, response times
QualityNPS/CSI, complaints, damage, extension, outflow
ValuesPercentage of certified objects, distribution of A to F, revaluation

13. Legal framework

Before launching, it is necessary to legally determine the nature of the service for each product: renting individual space, responsible storage or a mixed service model. This depends on the obligations of the parties, the responsibility for the content and the procedure for proving the status.

  • Contractual model, rules of access, delay, blocking and release of boxing.
  • List of prohibited and restricted items; procedure for checking without unjustified interference with privacy.
  • Fire, sanitary, anti-terrorist and object safety.
  • Processing of personal data, video surveillance, storage of journals and electronic consents.
  • Property and liability insurance; transparent limits and exceptions.
  • The tax model and the use of online cash registers, taking into account the current rules on the date of launch.

Legal and tax provisions should be checked by specialized specialists in relation to a specific jurisdiction, object and date of launch.

14. Pilot's road map

  1. Choose a city and three priority areas; build a map of demand, competitors and rates.
  2. Conduct a technical and legal audit of 5–7 premises; select the pilot object.
  3. Fix the product matrix, classes A-F, rules of acceptable content and tariffs.
  4. Design planning, engineering systems, security and customer route.
  5. Launch MVP digital platform: booking, contract, payment, access and event log.
  6. Refurbish the facility, conduct tests and open pre-sales.
  7. Run the pilot for 90 days; analyze demand, downloads, errors and incidents weekly.
  8. After the control point, make a decision: adjust, scale or change the format.
CheckpointTransition criterion
Prior to the rental of the objectConfirmed demand, the economy withstands the stress scenario, the room is audited
Before openingAccess, payments, fire protection, video surveillance and emergency scenarios work
After 90 daysThere are confirmed CAC, conversion, download, hold and operating SLA
Prior to scalingStandards are reproducible, command controls object without manual chaos

15. Scaling model

The network develops not as a set of identical warehouses, but as a portfolio of formats united by a single system of data and standards.

FormatLocationPurpose
HomeResidential quarter, parking, basementSeasonal and household items
DistrictTransport hub, first lineB2C + Relocations + Microbusiness
Business HubIndustrial/business areaGoods, tools, archives, supplies
SpecializedPrepared objectValuable, archival and climate sensitive objects
Backup NodeGeographically dispersed areaInsurance copies and critical stocks

16. Institutional Storage Circuit

The next level of development transforms VENUE from a network of storerooms into an infrastructure for the preservation, confirmation and circulation of assets. Different objects are placed in specialized contours, but are managed through a single passport of value and a common journal of rights and events.

ContourObjectsInfrastructure
ArtisticPaintings, sculptures, antiques, manuscriptsArt-repositories, museum funds, free ports
JewelleryMetals, stones, products, watches, coinsSafe centers, jewelry depositories, Security House
FinancialSecurities, certificates, documents of rightsDepository, custodial and registry systems
DigitalData, digital rights, keys, program codeData centers, protected repositories, cold storage
CustomsForeign goods and transit consignmentsSVH, customs and free warehouses
IndustrialMaterials, equipment, componentsSEZ, industrial parks, logistics terminals
StrategicReserves, critical stocks, insurance copiesSecure Distributed Storage

17. Art repositories and artistic values

The art repository is designed for professional storage of works of art, collections and cultural values with a controlled environment, proof of origin and state fixation.

ZonePurposeBasic requirements
ReceptionUnpacking, reconciliation and primary fixationSeparate streams, video recording, status act
QuarantineIsolation of incoming objectsInspection, control of pests and contaminants
ClimaticLong-term storageStable environment parameters, monitoring and log
Large formatSculpture and major worksLoad calculation, safe movement
Safe deposit boxMiniatures, precious and especially valuable itemsEnhanced access and individual alarms
RestorativeConservation and restorationSeparate regime, qualified specialists
ViewingExamination and closed transactionsControlled delivery without removal from the protected circuit

Digital Passport Works

  • Author, title, date, technique, dimensions, materials and marking.
  • High resolution photos and identification signs.
  • History of origin, ownership, exhibitions and movements.
  • Expert opinions, status and restoration interventions.
  • Estimated and insurance value, rights to image and reproduction.
  • Requirements for climate, packaging, exhibiting and transportation.

18. Jewellery and Precious Values

The jewelry circuit combines physical preservation, examination, confirmation of characteristics and protected performance of operations.

LevelFormatPurpose
J1Individual safe deposit boxDocuments, jewelry and small collections
J2Certified safe roomIncreased physical protection and access log
J3Jewelry DepositoryInventory, examination, insurance and sealing
J4Armored storageLarge parties, bars and particularly valuable assets
J5Distributed StorageSeparation of critical stock by independent points

Mandatory services: weighing, photo fixation, gemological examination, verification of samples and certificates, sealing, dual-key access, insurance and secure transportation.

19. Security House — House of protected values

Security House is a multifunctional center where a valuable asset can be stored, valued, insured, displayed and participate in a transaction without necessarily moving outside the protected area.

ModuleFunction
Safe DepositoryIndividual and corporate storage of material values
Art-repositoryProfessional storage of art and collections
Jewellery BlockMetals, stones, products and closed views
Documentary BlockOriginal documents, titles, certificates and archives
Digital StorageKeys, digital rights and backups
Expert CenterIdentification, evaluation, authenticity and status
Trust OfficeNotarial, insurance, legal and settlement services
The Situation CentreSecurity monitoring and incident response

20. Repository System

The repository not only preserves the object itself, but also its description, versions, origin, rights, connections and rules of use.

Type of repositorySubjectSpecial function
Art-repositoryArt and CollectionsProvenance, condition, exhibition history
ScientificResearch results and samplesReproducibility and citation
TechnologicalPrototypes, drawings, modelsVersionality and trade secret regime
IntelligentPatents, techniques, know-howFixing authorship, rights and licenses
SoftwareCode, builds and dependenciesVersion control and recovery
EvidentiaryDocuments, records, digital footprintsIntegrity and chain of custody
CulturallyArchives, chronicles, mediaLong-term preservation and access
StandbyInsurance copies and critical dataGeographical dispersion

21. Depository system

The depositary shall keep the tangible asset or ensure that the rights to it are accounted for. In a single system, these functions differ and are linked through confirmed records.

TypeStorage or accounting objectKey result
SafeMaterial values and documentsPhysical safety and controlled access
BankovskiyClient Properties in Protected CellsContractual access regime
SecuritiesRights to financial instrumentsRegistration of ownership and transfer of rights
SpecializedAssets of regulated entitiesIndependent monitoring of established operations
MerchandiseGoods and warehouse documentsConfirmation of existence, status and encumbrances
Art DepositoryArt and CollectionsStorage, provenance, valuation and insurance
JewelleryMetals, stones and productsExamination, inventory and protected treatment
DigitalDigital Assets and KeysSecured Ownership and Recovery
EscrowAssets before the conditionConditional transmission on a confirmed event
InheritedFamily and birth valuesContinuity and execution of orders

22. Securities and financial assets

For most modern securities, the main object of preservation is not a paper certificate, but a confirmed record of the rights of the owner. Physical documents, if they exist, are stored separately from the accounting circuit.

FunctionContents
Accounting rightsPersonal accounts, depot accounts and other prescribed forms of accounting
CalculationsDelivery of the asset and execution of the monetary part of the transaction
BurdensFixing of pledge, blocking and other restrictions
Corporate ActionsRevenue, redemption, conversion and voting
Castodial controlStorage, confirmation and reporting of assets
ContinuityData backup, recovery and reconciliation
InheritanceTransfer of rights on a confirmed basis

23. Customs storage areas

The customs contour applies to goods under special control before release, change of regime, movement or re-export. Specific operations are determined by the current legislation and permits of the object.

FormatPurposeManagement accent
Temporary storage warehouseAccommodation until formalities are completedDates, safety, identification of the party
Customs warehouseStorage in the established customs regimeStatus of goods, transactions and payments
Free warehouseProduction and logistics operations in a special modeSeparate accounting and control of use
Free customs zoneInfrastructure of the territory with special regimeZone boundaries, tolerance and traceability
Bond warehouseStorage of imported goods before release or exportControl of lot and commercial operations
Transit TerminalConsolidation and further movementRoute, timing and integrity of cargo

Passport of the party

Product → Owner → origin → code and description → documents → Customs status → Place → authorized operations → payments → Release or re-export.

24. Special economic zones

SEZ is not a separate type of warehouse, but a territorial regime within which production, storage, customs infrastructure, certification, financing and export can be combined.

SEZ ModulePurpose
Industrial WarehouseMaterials, components and finished products
Customs and logistics terminalReception, control, consolidation and release of parties
Free warehouseSpecial operations
Refrigeration complexTemperature-sensitive goods
E-commerce CenterFulfillment, returns and cross-border trade
Technological repositoryDocumentation, samples, prototypes and rights
Certification CenterConformity check and evidentiary documentation
Trade and Exhibition DepositoryShow and trades without unnecessary movement
Strategic ReserveCritical materials and equipment

25. Additional specialized storage

GroupTypes
TransportPort and aviation warehouses, container depots, railway and road terminals
TemperatureRefrigeration, freezer, pharmaceutical and food complexes
RegulatedChemical, combustible, radioactive, medical and weapons storage facilities
InformationData Centers, Archival Sites, Data Rooms, Key Storage
BiologicalBiobanks, cryostores, seed banks and collections of microorganisms
NaturalKernels, environmental samples, herbariums and biodiversity funds
StandbyState, municipal, medical, food and emergency reserves
Space and scientificSamples, unique instruments and data from long-term studies

26. Single route of institutional asset

StageDecisionMonitoring
QualificationDetermine the legal status, category and admissibility of storageExpert opinion and list of restrictions
Verification of originCollected ownership documents and the history of the objectCompliance and Gap Fixing
EvaluationCharacteristics, condition and cost are determinedIndependence of method and expert
Designation of regimeStorage, climate, access and insurance are selectedClass A to F
Reception and markingPassport, act, package and ID are createdStorage Chain
OperationMonitoring, journaling and re-evaluationSLA, incidents and validity period of documents
Operation with assetView, pledge, transfer, sale or exhibitionCredentials and charges
WithdrawalReturn, transfer, inheritance or disposalClosing Act and Preservation of History

27. Rules of responsibility sharing

  • The owner confirms the rights, discloses the essential properties and observes the list of permissible contents.
  • The operator is responsible for the stated conditions, the safety of the object and the evidence of operations.
  • The appraiser and the expert act independently within the limits of their qualification.
  • The insurer accepts the risk only after the agreement of the object, cost and storage mode.
  • The logistician is responsible for the agreed section of the chain of movement and transmission by act.
  • The depositary or registrar is responsible for the accounting of rights, but does not replace the physical custodian.
  • The customs representative and the warehouse owner shall act within the established regime and powers.

28. Five-level product architecture

LevelPurposeTypical Clients
PLACE PERSONALPersonal belongings, family archives and household valuesCitizens and families
LOCATION BusinessGoods, tools, documents and equipmentEntrepreneurs and companies
LOCATION ProfessionalArt, jewelry and collectible assetsCollectors, galleries, experts
LOCATION InstitutionalDepositories, foundations, museums and corporate archivesBanks, funds, museums, corporations
PLACES STRATEGICSEZs, customs zones and distributed reservesState, territories, major operators

29. Final positioning

Positioning:

  • For a person - more free space and tranquility.
  • For business, there is a flexible infrastructure with no extra space.
  • For partners, there is a standardized network of services around storage.
  • For the investor, a scalable model with basic rental and additional service revenue.

Key slogan

“We don’t keep things, we keep value.”

Other published edition: STRATEGIC CONCEPT PLACE_single_storage_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

We do not store things -

PLACE

SAVED

VALUES

Unified storage system

Values

PROFESSIONAL

From self-storage to institutional

INSTITUTIONAL

Trust Infrastructure

REGULATED

STRATEGIC

2026

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Model Shift: From Area to Value Management

Ordinary storage

"Place" system

Sells square meters and term. Competing with location,

Determines value, risk and mode; records

price and availability.

responsibility; manages access, movement and confirmation of security.

not a box, but a managed storage mode

New product unit

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Single life cycle of the object

Identifier

Rate

Assign

Accept

Store

Use

Print

the New Mode

One route applies to household items, art, metals, documents, financial and digital

Only the depth of the regime changes.

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Two axis classification: what we store and how critical

Personal belongings

Art

Jewellery Values

Documents

Financial assets

Digital assets

Goods under control

Strategic assets

A • basic

B. Enhanced C. Valuable

  • D. Specifically

a valuable regulated strategic category determines the nature of the facility. Class - requirements for safety, control and evidence.

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Passport of value — the digital core of the system

Identity

VALUE PASSPORT

Painting NoA-0147

Legal status

Category: art

Risk profile

Class D - especially valuable

Mode: climate + dual access

Insurance: actively

Event history: 18 records

Storage Mode

History

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Five levels of product architecture

Personal

household items, seasonal storage

Professional

business stocks, equipment, archive

Institutional

art, jewelry, collections

Regulated

Depository and customs contours

Strategic

Reserve and State-Significant Assets

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Basic scenarios form the flow and trust

Seasonal

Relocation

Repairs

sports, tires, furniture temporary accommodation property protection

Business

Archive

Collections

goods and equipment documents and carriers wine, items, rarity

Base segment loads infrastructure; specialized modes raise average check and barrier

exit.

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Institutional Outline: Seven Specialized Environments

Art Repositories

Jewelery

Security House

Repositories

Values

Depositaries

Customs zones

Special

Common Core Economic Zones: Passport Value, Access Management, Evidence-Based History, and Partner Orchestration.

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Art repository: preservation + turnover collection

Environment

Monitoring

Service

temperature and humidity condition report restoration and inspection light mode

Photo fixation

Insurance Dust and Biosecurity Curatorial Access Logistics Exhibitions Specialized Packaging Movement Control Virtual Office Owner

Value is created not only in storage, but also in the readiness of the object for safe transmission, display or

Sale.

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Jewelry Outline and Security House

Objects

SECURITY HOUSE

jewelry - precious stones - metals

Protected environment

for particularly valuable assets

Evidence

weighing - seals - certificates - storage access history and safe deposit boxes two-factor access role separation

Operational principle

continuous recording of events insurance and expert services no employee does not control the full cycle alone

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Repository and Depository - Different Functions

Repository

Depositary

Stores an object or a reliable record of it. Focus:

It takes into account the rights and operations of the asset. Focus: owner, identity, immutability, versions, origin, encumbrances, transfer of rights, calculations, regulatory access.

Reporting.

A value passport links a physical object, a digital record, and a legally significant

Integration

Law

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Securities and financial assets

Documentary

Undocumented

certificates, promissory notes, mortgages, registration of rights through the depository infrastructure

Resource provision

Digital

metals, documents and other collateral assets keys, media, backups, access policies Role of "Place": a safe physical environment and a trusted digital layer - without substituting the licensed functions of partners.

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Customs zones and SEZs: storage within the regime

Customs area

Special economic

Platform "Place"

zone goods under customs control localization of operations passport of the party accounting of parties and statuses tax and customs benefits

The End-to-End Event Log

access to the regulation infrastructure residents sharing responsibility integration with the broker control of origin

ARI for operators and controllers

Physical storage becomes part of the legal and economic regime of the asset.

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Institutional route of the asset

Due diligence

Acceptance

Accommodation

law, origin, limitations of examination, fixation, packing cell, environment, access

Monitoring

Operation

Conclusion

status, events, reporting inspection, pledge, display, transmission verification and closing history

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Economy: two layers of revenue

1 • Infrastructural revenue =3 million ₽ Square • Cells • Term • pilot's investment access 600-650 thousands. ₽ Monthly Revenue

2 Service revenue

15-24 months

packing • logistics • insurance • examination - digital accounting payback reference

Preliminary parameters of the original model; require verification

location, download and SAREKH PENOV: ulinelik podoj "Place.

PLACE • SINGLE SYSTEM

Pilot and Scaling

0-2 months

3-5 months

6-12 months

12+ months

Design

Run

Prove

Scale

right - product • object • IT - partners download • SLA • new locations - security unit-economy

Franchise • B2B

Basis: concept of the project “Place”

PLACE

We do not store things -

NEXT STEP

We retain value

Pilot

Standards → Network

Single operating system for personal, professional,

Institutional, regulated and strategic assets.

Strategic Concept - 2026

Published files

SFERA · Full published text

A World Without Borders. Promoting the Portal

Source Status: Primary Document

Portal Promotion Strategy

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/mir-bez-granits-prodvizhenie-portala

Open on the site

Portal of culture, knowledge, cities, events and creative initiatives

Version 1.0 • 22 August 2026

1. Summary

The promotion of the portal “World without borders” should not be built as an advertising campaign of an ordinary website, but as a launch of an international social and cultural movement with a digital platform in the center.

The main logic of promotion: first create status, then trust, then community and after that - a steady flow of applications, events, partners and projects.

2. The main goal of promotion

The purpose of the portal promotion is to make the “World without borders” a recognizable international platform of culture, knowledge, cities, events and public diplomacy.

The portal should be perceived not as an information page, but as a digital center of a meta-project, a platform for partners, experts, cities, organizations, authors of initiatives and media.

  • entry point into international cooperation;
  • showcase of cultural, scientific and urban initiatives;
  • a single calendar of events and public programs;
  • register of projects, experts, cities and partners;
  • The media platform of the new humanitarian movement.

3. Positioning

External communication requires three levels of positioning: short, extended, and emotional.

LevelFormulation
Short“World without borders” is an international portal of culture, knowledge, cities, events and creative initiatives.
AdvancedA digital platform and meta-project that brings together cities, organizations, experts, cultural and scientific initiatives, educational programs and events.
EmotionallyThe boundaries divide the territories. Culture connects people.

4. Target Audiences

Promotion should go not to one audience, but to several circles. Each circle needs its own landing pages, letters, arguments and inclusion forms.

Cities and municipalities
  • New positioning of the city
  • promotion of urban events
  • International Relations
  • status "City of Knowledge", "City of Events", "City of Culture"
Cultural organizations
  • Placement of initiatives
  • participation in the registry
  • Event promotion
  • Partnership programs and international visibility
Universities and research centres
  • a platform for programs
  • Conference and Research
  • Academic Outline
  • Access to youth and experts
Project authors
  • Project Showcase
  • search for partners
  • Logging in
  • participation in events and media support
Young people
  • Internship
  • Volunteering
  • Clubs
  • Competitions
  • International communication and personal development trajectory
Experts
  • public profile
  • Participation in Councils
  • Publications
  • expert sessions and mentoring
Business and patrons
  • Status participation
  • Social Mission
  • cultural reputation
  • Participation in urban and international programs
Media
  • News
  • Heroes
  • Events
  • expert comments
  • themes on culture and international cooperation

5. Communication lines

Culture without Borders

Shows how culture connects peoples, cities and generations.

  • Articles
  • Interview
  • the History of Cultural Projects
  • Days of Culture
Cities Without Borders

It shows cities as centers of knowledge, events and international dialogue.

  • City of the Week
  • Map of cities
  • Interviews with city representatives
  • Special Projects on Initiatives
Knowledge without Borders

It shows the educational and scientific potential of the project.

  • Lectures
  • Courses
  • expert articles
  • Academic Programs
Events Without Borders

Shows the forum, festival and event life of the portal.

  • calendar of events
  • Announcements
  • Reportage
  • Broadcasts
  • archive of materials
People Without Borders

Shows specific people: creators, experts, volunteers, mentors, authors of projects.

  • Interview
  • short videos
  • personal stories
  • Category "Face of the project"

6. Promotion channels

6.1. Official portal

The official portal is the central point of all communication. External advertising should lead not only to the main page, but to specific landing pages: for cities, partners, authors of projects, youth, experts and cultural organizations.

  • News
  • Events
  • projects
  • Applications
  • Partners
  • Media Center
  • documents
  • Registers
  • calendar
  • Forms of participation

6.2. Social networks

Social networks should work like a daily pulse of the portal. The main channels are Telegram, VK, YouTube, Rutube, Zen, international visual and expert platforms where it is permissible and appropriate.

  • News of the Day
  • Draft of the week
  • City of the Week
  • Event of the week
  • Expert opinion
  • human history
  • Manifesto Quote
  • short video
  • Invitation to participate

6.3. Media and PR

A press package and a media base must be formed. The press service should regularly give information: the launch of the portal, new cities, new projects, partnerships, expert sessions, the calendar of events and the first results.

  • Launch Press Release
  • Project description
  • Biographies of Key Persons
  • visual materials
  • Logo
  • Presentation
  • FAQ
  • Contacts of the press service

6.4. Affiliate Newsletters

For each audience, you need a separate letter with its own logic of benefit and its own application form.

  • City
  • Universities
  • Museums
  • Theatres
  • Film Organization
  • Funds
  • Public organizations
  • experts
  • Media
  • business partners

6.5. Event promotion

The portal should be promoted through its own events: presentations, round tables, online forums, press conferences, expert sessions, cultural evenings and strategic sessions of cities.

7. The Ambassadors Programme

Ambassadors are needed for the network growth of the project and its access to cities, professional communities, youth circles, universities and cultural organizations.

  • Ambassadors of cities
  • Ambassadors of Culture
  • Ambassadors of Science
  • Ambassadors of Youth
  • Ambassadors for International Cooperation
  • Ambassadors of events
  • Ambassadors for Film and Media

Each ambassador receives a page on the portal, status, digital sign, the right to present the project in his direction and the opportunity to publish initiatives.

8. Content strategy

PeriodicityContent
Dailyshort news; project quote; announcement of the event; project card; publication in social networks
Weeklycity of the week; project of the week; expert interview; review of events; selection of opportunities
Monthlyelectronic magazine; analytical review; large video; affiliate mailing; open online meeting
Quarterlyforum; portal development report; registry update; presentation of new cities and partners; public strategic session

9. Promotional funnel

Recognising

A person sees a video, publication, news, interview, post or invitation.

Interest

A person goes to the portal and gets acquainted with the mission, directions, events, cities and projects.

Involvement

A person chooses an action: become a participant, add a project, offer a city, offer an event or become a partner.

Participation

A person receives a participant card, a project in the registry, an event in the calendar or an invitation to the community.

Ambassador of the project

The active participant begins to bring others and starts network growth.

10. Launch plan for 30 days

WeekKey actions
Week 1. Trainingapprove positioning; prepare the main page; create pages for audiences; prepare a press release; configure application forms; create social networks; prepare the first 20 publications
Week 2. Soft Startinvite the first partners; download the first projects; add events; hold a closed presentation; collect feedback
Week 3. Public launchissue a press release; publish a manifesto; launch social networks; hold an online presentation; open the application process; send letters to cities, organizations and experts
Week 4. Fixingpublish the results of the launch; show the first participants; hold an expert session; launch the headings "City of the Week" and "Project of the Week"; form a plan for 90 days

11. Scaling plan for 90 days

First month: status and launch
  • portal is open
  • There are first partners
  • There are first projects
  • Have an event calendar
  • a Media Package
  • There are application forms
  • There are social networks
Second Month: Filling and Trust
  • 30–50 projects in the register
  • 10–20 events in calendar
  • 10 cities in database
  • 20 Expert Profiles
  • 5–10 partners
  • First interviews and videos
Third Month: Scaling
  • The First Open Forum
  • the Ambassadors Program
  • Opening of the Academy
  • Affiliate Newsletter
  • International version of the portal
  • The first electronic magazine

12. Advertising messages

General audience

Join the portal "World without borders" - a space of culture, knowledge, cities, events and creative initiatives.

Cities

Your city can become part of an international map of culture, knowledge and events.

Projects

Place your project in the register "World without borders" and find partners, experts and new opportunities.

Organizations

Become a partner of a platform that combines culture, science, education and social cooperation.

Young people

Join an international community of young leaders, volunteers, researchers and creators.

Experts

Join the expert club "World without borders" and participate in the design of new forms of cooperation.

13. Visual strategy

The image of the portal should be light, large-scale and international. The visual system must convey the sense that the world is connected through culture, trust and co-creation.

  • Planet
  • Bridges
  • City
  • People of different cultures
  • light lines of connection
  • World Map
  • universities, theaters, museums
  • the Forums and Festivals
  • Symbols of Knowledge and Culture
  • the Digital Network

14. Video for promotion

15-second teaser
  1. The world is divided by lines, borders and the noise of the news.
  2. People, cities, scenes, universities, museums and events appear.
  3. Border lines become light bridges.
  4. Cities are on the map.
  5. The portal "World without borders" is appearing.
  6. The final text: “Culture. Knowledge. Cities. Events. People. A world without borders.”
60-second roller
  • Problem: The world is tired of separation
  • Solution: A new platform of trust is needed
  • Culture and knowledge connect people
  • tool: portal "World without borders"
  • invitation: become a member, partner, city or expert

15. KPI promotions

Indicator30 days90 days1 years
Visitors1 000+10 000+100 000+
Applications100+500+1 000+ members
Projects20+50+300+
Events10+30+100+
CitiesThe first cities in the database10+50+
Partners5+20+100+
ExpertsThe first core50+Expert Network
Institutional resultsPresentation EventForum and Journalannual forum, Academy, international version

16. Critically important condition

The portal cannot be promoted as an empty shell. Before a wide launch, it should have the first 20–30 strong objects: projects, cities, events, partners and experts.

Every day something should happen on the portal: a new project, a new event, a new city, a new expert, a new article, a new interview, a new opportunity, a new application or a new partner.

17. Final formula

“A world without borders” should be promoted as a living system of international cooperation, and not as a separate site. Its power lies in the combination of the portal, registers, events, cities, media, partners and people.

The main goal of the promotion is not just to attract traffic, but to gather a real international community of people, cities, organizations and projects around the portal.

The document was prepared for the meta-project “World without borders”.

Other published edition: WORLD WITHOUT BORDERS World_without_boundaries_promotion_portal.pptx · Web Text +

Portal promotion

A strategy for launching, promoting and scaling an international platform of culture, knowledge, cities, events and creative initiatives.

Culture

Knowledge

Cities

Events

People

Version 1.0 · August 2026

The main idea of promotion

We promote not the site, but the assembly center of the international movement

“World without borders” is a space where culture, knowledge, cities and events are combined into a system of cooperation.

Status

Trust

Community

Stream

The portal should look like an active center of power, not an empty showcase.

First partners, projects, events and experts create the basis of legitimacy.

Participants get a role, a page, a form of action and a reason to return.

Applications, events, publications, partnerships, city connections.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

What the portal should do

From Information Site to Digital Work Platform

Map of cities

Register of projects

Calendar of events

PORTAL

Academy

Partner Network

Media Center

External promotion should lead not to one main page, but to specific entrances: for cities, partners, projects, youth, experts and the media.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Target Audiences

For each audience - your offer, page and application form

Cities

Culture

Universities

Project authors

positioning, events, international map

museums, theatres, festivals, creative unions

courses, research, conferences, youth

showcase, partners, experts, resources

Young people

Experts

Business

Media

volunteering, internships, clubs, competitions

profile, tips, publications, mentoring

status, social mission, partnership packages

news, heroes, themes, comments

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Five communication lines

Categories through which the portal becomes alive and understandable

Culture without Borders

history, festivals, traditions, cultural diplomacy

Cities Without Borders

city of the week, city map, municipal initiatives

Knowledge without Borders

lectures, courses, research, expert articles

Events Without Borders

calendar, announcements, broadcasts, archive

People Without Borders

interviews, personal stories, ambassadors, mentors

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Promotion channels

Portal in the center, around - media, partners, events and social networks

Portal

Social networks

PR and Media

landing pages, forms, registers, news

Telegram, VK, YouTube/Rutube, Zen, international channels

press releases, interviews, special topics, press kit

Newsletters

Events

Ambassadors

letters to cities, universities, museums, foundations, experts

presentations, forums, round tables, expert sessions

urban, cultural, youth, scientific representatives

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Involvement funnel

The main KPI is not traffic, but the transition of a person into action

Recognising

Interest

Involvement

Participation

Ambassador

video, post, news, invitation

the Audience Page

application: project, city, partner, expert

card, event, publication, role

Participants bring new members

Each stage needs its own materials: a short message, landing page, form, automatic confirmation and the next step of participation.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Content strategy

The portal should show movement every day

Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Quarterly

• news • event announcement • project card • publication in social networks • manifesto quote

• City Week • Project Week • Interview • Review of Events • Selection of Opportunities

• electronic magazine • analytical review • video material • affiliate newsletter • open meeting

• forum • report • registry update • partners presentation • strategic session

Content should lead to action: subscribe, apply, offer an event, join an affiliate network.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

PR and partner communications

You need different letters and different login pages

Launch Press Package

Packages of letters

Launch Press Release

Project and mission description

Biographies of Key Persons

logo and visual materials

presentation and FAQ

Contacts of the press service

Cities and Municipalities

Universities and Research Centers

museums, theaters, festivals

Foundations and Public Organizations

Experts and Media

Business and patrons

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

The Ambassadors Programme

Networking through people with roles, status and mission

Ambassadors of Cities

Ambassadors of Culture

Ambassadors of Science

Present a portal in the territory

Collecting cultural initiatives

conduct expert and educational programs

Ambassadors Youth

Ambassadors Events

Ambassadors Media

launch clubs, volunteering and internships

create a calendar and partner formats

produce stories, interviews, reports

Each ambassador receives a page, a digital sign, the right to publish initiatives and present the direction of the project.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

First 30 days

Launch through status, content, publicity and consolidation

Week 1

Week 2

Week 3

Week 4

positioning, home page, forms, press release, first 20 publications

first partners, projects, events, closed presentation, feedback

public launch, manifesto, social networks, online presentation, mailings

launch results, first participants, expert session, rubrics, plan for 90 days

Critically important: before the public launch, download the first 20–30 strong objects - projects, cities, events, partners, experts.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Plan for 90 days

Three phases: → trust → scaling status

1 month

2 month

3 month

Status and launch

Filling and trust

Scaling

portal is open, applications are working, there are partners, projects, calendar and media package

30–50 projects, 10–20 events, 10 cities, 20 experts, first interviews

open forum, ambassadors, Academy, international version, first magazine

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

KPI Promotions

Indicators are needed not for the report, but for growth management

30 days

90 days

1 years

1 000+ Visitors 100+ Applications 20+ Projects 10+ Events 5+ Partners 1 Presentation Event

10 000+ Visitors 500+ Applications 50+ Projects 30+ Events 10+ Cities 20+ Partners

100 000+ Visitors 1 000+ Participants 300+ Projects 100+ Events 50+ the Annual Forum

The main qualitative is KPI: the portal is perceived as a living system, where new people, projects, events and partners constantly appear.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Upcoming Actions

What to do before an advertising campaign

Approve positioning and slogan

Collect the first 20–30 portal objects

Prepare login pages for audiences

Launch application forms and basic analytics

Collect a press package and partner letters

Conduct a launch presentation forum

An empty portal cannot be promoted - first it must be made similar to the already existing center of power.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Other published edition: WORLD WITHOUT BORDERS World_without_boundaries_promotion_portal.pdf · web text +

Portal promotion

Launch, promotion and scaling strategy

an international platform of culture, knowledge, cities, events and creative initiatives.

Culture Knowledge Cities Events People

Version 1.0 · August 2026

The main idea of promotion

We promote not the site, but the assembly center of the international movement

“World without borders” is a space where culture, knowledge, cities and events are combined into a system of cooperation.

Status Trust Community Flow

1 2 3 4

The portal should look First partners, projects, participants get a role, applications, events,

As an active center of events and experts create a page, form of action and publication, force, and not as an empty basis of legitimacy. reason to return. partnerships, showcase. urban connections.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

What the portal should do

From Information Site to Digital Work Platform

Map of cities

Project Register Calendar

Events

PORTAL

Academy Partner Network

Media Center

External promotion should lead not to one main page, but to specific entrances: for cities, partners,

projects, youth, experts and media.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Target Audiences

For each audience - your offer, page and application form

Cities Culture Universities Authors

1 2 3 4 projects positioning, museums, theaters, festivals, courses, research, showcase, partners, events, international creative unions conference, youth experts, resources map

Youth Experts Business Media

5 6 7 8 volunteering, internships, profile, advice, status, social mission, news, heroes, themes, clubs, publishing contests, partner packages comments mentoring

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Five communication lines

Categories through which the portal becomes alive and understandable

Culture without Borders

history, festivals, traditions, cultural diplomacy

Cities Without Borders

city of the week, city map, municipal initiatives

Knowledge without Borders

lectures, courses, research, expert articles

Events Without Borders

calendar, announcements, broadcasts, archive

People Without Borders

interviews, personal stories, ambassadors, mentors

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Promotion channels

Portal in the center, around - media, partners, events and social networks

Social media portal PR and media

landing pages, forms, Telegram, VK, YouTube/Rutube, Zen, press releases, interviews, special topics, registries, news international channels press kit

Sending Events Ambassadors

letters to cities, universities, museums, presentations, forums, round tables, city, cultural, youth, foundations, experts, scientific representatives

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Involvement funnel

The main KPI is not traffic, but the transition of a person into action

Acknowledgment Interest Involvement Ambassador

video, post, news, transition to the application page: project, card, event, participant leads audience invitation city, partner, publication, role of new participants expert

Each stage needs its own materials: a short message, landing page, form,

automatic confirmation and the next step of participation.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Content strategy

The portal should show movement every day

Daily Weekly Monthly Quarterly

  • • news • city week • e-journal • forum
  • • announcement of the event • draft of the week • analytical review • report
  • • project card • interview • video material • registry update
  • • publication in social networks • review of events • affiliate mailing • presentation
  • • Manifesto quote • feature set • open meeting partners
  • • strategic session

Content should lead to action: subscribe, apply, offer an event, join an affiliate network.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

PR and partner communications

You need different letters and different login pages

Press-package launch Packages of letters

press release launch cities and municipalities description of the project and mission to universities and research centers biography of key persons museums, theaters, festivals logo and visual materials to foundations and public organizations presentation and FAQ experts and media contacts of the press service of business and patrons

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

The Ambassadors Programme

Networking through people with roles, status and mission

Ambassadors Cities Ambassadors Culture Ambassadors Science

present a portal on the territory collect cultural initiatives conduct expert and educational programs

Ambassadors Youth Ambassadors Events Ambassadors Media

launch clubs, volunteering and create a calendar and partner produce stories, interviews, internships, reporting formats

Each ambassador receives a page, a digital sign, the right to

publish initiatives and present the project direction.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

First 30 days

Launch through status, content, publicity and consolidation

Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4

1 2 3 4 positioning, first partners, public launch, launch results, first home page, forms, projects, events, manifesto, social networks, participants, expert press release, first 20 closed presentation, online presentation, session, rubrics, plan for publications newsletter feedback 90 days

Critically important: before public launch, download the first 20–30 strong objects - projects, cities,

events, partners, experts.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Plan for 90 days

Three phases: → trust → scaling status

1 month 2 month 3 month

Status and start Up and scale

trust portal open, applications 30–50 Projects, 10–20 open forum, work, have partners, events, 10 Cities, 20 Ambassadors, Academy, projects, calendar and experts, first interviews, international version, media package first magazine

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

KPI Promotions

Indicators are needed not for the report, but for growth management

30 days 90 days 1 year 1 000+ Visitors 10 000+ Visitors 100 000+ Visitors 100+ Applications 500+ Applications 1 000+ Participants 20+ Projects 50+ Projects 300+ Projects 10+ Events 30+ Events 100+ Events 5+ Partners 10+ Cities 50+ Cities 1 Presentation Event 20+ Partners Annual Forum

The main quality KPI: the portal is perceived as a living system, where new people constantly appear,

projects, events and partners.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Upcoming Actions

What to do before an advertising campaign

Approve positioning and slogan Collect the first 20–30 portal objects

Prepare login pages for Start application forms and basic

Audience Analytics

To collect a press package and partner letters To hold a launch forum presentation

An empty portal can not be promoted - first it must be done

It looks like an existing center of power.

World without borders · portal promotion strategy

Published files

Platform · Full published text

WE ARE AT THE STATE COUNCIL

Source Status: Primary Document

The place of the SPECZASHCHITA — ECO‑PPA — EQUILIBRIUM programme in the structure of the State Council of the Russian Federation

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/my-na-gossovete

Open on the site

Prepared for preliminary interdepartmental and expert discussion

August 2026 years

1. Our position in the State Council system

The State Council is for the program the upper strategic contour of coordination of federal, regional and municipal decisions. Our task is to enter not with a request for support of an individual organization, but with a proven model for solving cross-sectoral state tasks.

ContourRole in the program
ECO‑PPAMechanism of formation, resource support and implementation of integrated programs.
SPECZASHCHITAA cooperative execution operator that unites enterprises, technologies and regional platforms.
EQUILIBRIUMSystem of observation, forecasting, digital passports and verification of results.
SFERAPublic outline of initiatives, communication and citizen participation.
Eco-modules and mini-generationThe first subject products for pilot implementation and effect confirmation.

2. Leading outline of State Council commissions

The entry point is proposed to determine the Commission in the direction of "Environmental well-being". At the same time, the program requires inter-commission assembly, as it combines ecology, energy, industry, infrastructure, data and investment.

CommissionOur subjectExpected action
Environmental Well-beingECO-PPA, eco-modules, restoration of territoriesLeading commission; setting up an interregional environmental pilot.
EnergyMini-generation, autonomous energy complexesDistributed energy pilots and connectivity requirements.
IndustryProduction cooperation, materials, localizationRegister of manufacturers and serial production program.
Technological leadershipEQUILIBRIUM, new technologies, R&DIndependent technological expertise and testing program.
Infrastructure for LifeIntegrated development of territoriesInclusion of solutions in master plans and infrastructure projects.
InvestmentsProject financing, PPP, concessionsFinancial model and funding of pilot projects.

3. Supporting Commissions

BlockCommissionProgram Objectives
Finance and EconomicsEconomics and Finance; Efficient and competitive economyBudget and extra-budgetary mechanisms, payback, productivity, SMEs.
Management and dataPublic and municipal administration; Data EconomyRegulations of interaction, digital passports, monitoring of indicators.
TerritoriesAgriculture; Northern Sea Route and Arctic; TransportAIC, remote areas, logistics and sustainability of supply.
PersonPersonnel; Family; Young people and children; Prolonged and active lifePersonnel program, health, employment, involvement of families and youth.
International contourInternational cooperation and exports; TourismExport of solutions, cooperation with BRICS, environmental and scientific clusters.
ValuesCulture and traditional spiritual and moral values; SportThe image of the future, solidarity, responsible attitude to nature.

4. Proposed inter-commission working group

Name

"ECO-PPA - Integrated sustainable development of the territories of the Russian Federation".

Leadership

  • The head is the chairman of the profile commission of the State Council.
  • Deputy from the federal center is a representative of the Government of the Russian Federation.
  • Deputy from the regions is the head of the pilot subject of the Russian Federation.
  • The executive secretary is a representative of the State Council or the Presidential Administration.
  • SPECZASHCHITA - candidate for the functions of the operator of the project office after legal, financial and technological verification.

Participants

Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Ministry of Construction, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Transport, Rosprirodnadzor, Rosstandart, development institutes, pilot regions, municipalities, RF Chamber of Commerce, RSPP, ASI, scientific organizations and technology companies.

5. Internal structure of our program

Working PartyMain Function
Strategic CouncilGoals, national priorities, choice of regions, decisions to be submitted to the State Council.
Federal Program CommitteeInter-agency harmonization, regulation and government programs.
Scientific and Technological CouncilTesting, certification, technological readiness and evidence.
Investment and Finance CommitteePPPs, concessions, leasing, energy services, banks and development institutions.
Industrial and Cooperation CommitteeRegister of enterprises, orders, localization, quality and serial production.
Territorial Development CommitteeSelection of territories, survey, master plans and regional passports.
Data and Verification CommitteeEQUILIBRIUM: indicators, digital twins, monitoring and reporting.
Social and Expert CouncilSFERA: Initiatives, Feedback and Public Control.
Regional headquartersImplemented under the leadership of Governors.
Municipal officesObjects, land, documentation, construction and operation.

6. Committees of the Federal Assembly

In the State Council itself, the main working bodies are commissions and working groups. Committees of the State Duma and the Federation Council shall be involved in normative and budgetary support of decisions.

Parliamentary outlineSubject Accompaniment
State Duma: ecology and natural resourcesEnvironmental requirements, restoration of territories, environmental regulations.
State Duma: EnergySmall and distributed generation, energy service models.
State Duma: industry and tradeCooperation, localization and industrial support measures.
State Duma: economic policy; financial market; budget and taxesInvestment model, CFA, guarantees, tax and budget instruments.
State Duma: construction and housing; regional policyInfrastructure pilots, powers of regions and municipalities.
Federation Council: regional and economic policyInterregional model and representation of pilot subjects.
Federation Council: budget; environmental management; scienceFinancing, environmental regulation and scientific expertise.

7. Route to the State Council

  1. To prepare a single passport of the program, a financial model and a list of technologies.
  2. Get the support of one leading governor and form a pool of 3–5 pilot subjects.
  3. Conduct preliminary independent legal, financial, environmental and technological expertise.
  4. To submit materials to the Commission "Environmental Well-being" with a parallel referral to five specialized commissions.
  5. To hold an inter-commission strategic session with federal agencies and regions.
  6. Create a working group and approve the passports of pilot projects.
  7. Launch pilots with baselines, checkpoints and independent verification.
  8. Present the results to the Presidium of the State Council and prepare a list of instructions of the President.
  9. After confirming the effect, proceed to the federal scaling.

8. Package of documents for making

  • Strategic report "ECO-PPA - Integrated sustainable development of the territories of Russia".
  • Passport program: goals, objectives, indicators, deadlines, responsible.
  • Organizational scheme SPECZASHCHITA and confirmation of the competencies of participants.
  • Architecture EQUILIBRIUM and data requirements.
  • Register of technologies with readiness level, rights, tests and certificates.
  • Passports of pilot regions and municipalities.
  • Financial model with sources of funds and risk distribution.
  • A legal note and a list of necessary regulatory decisions.
  • Method of assessment of environmental, social and economic effect.
  • Draft regulation on an inter-commission working group.
  • Draft list of instructions of the President of the Russian Federation.

9. Draft decisions and instructions

  1. The Government of the Russian Federation together with the relevant commissions of the State Council to consider the concept of the interregional program ECO-PPA.
  2. Form an inter-agency and inter-commission working group.
  3. Identify the federal coordinating body and the responsible project office.
  4. Conduct a comprehensive independent examination of technologies, assets, rights and financial model.
  5. Select 3–5 subjects of the Russian Federation for pilot implementation.
  6. To develop the procedure for financing and distributing the risks of pilot projects.
  7. Establish a unified list of baselines and targets.
  8. Provide digital monitoring and independent verification of results.
  9. Submit an interim report six months after the pilots are launched.
  10. Following the results of the pilots, submit proposals for federal scaling.

10. Limitations and conditions of admission

  • Do not use language that gives the impression of already received state status or support.
  • Separate technology owners, operator, customer, investor, validator and controller.
  • Confirm intellectual property rights, assets and equipment.
  • To conduct procurement and selection of performers in accordance with applicable law.
  • Record the basic indicators before the pilot and the method of calculating the effect.
  • Provide for independent auditing, conflict of interest management and public reporting.

11. Final submission formula

Proposed institutional route: inter-commission working group → independent examination → Regional Pilots → Measurable result → Presidium of the State Council → the President 's Order → Federal Scaling.

Annex. The Responsibility Matrix

LevelResponsibilityResult
President / State CouncilStrategic decision and instructionsPolitical and management mandate.
The Russian GovernmentCoordination and regulatory supportThe interagency program.
the State Council CommissionExamination and coordination of directionsAgreed package of solutions.
GovernorsRegional leadershipPilot and achievement of indicators.
MunicipalitiesFacilities preparation and operationWorking solutions in the territory.
SPECZASHCHITACooperation of performersSupply, construction and implementation.
EQUILIBRIUMData and verificationConfirmed result.
SFERAPublic participationFeedback and legitimacy.
Science and AuditIndependent verificationEvidence and risk reduction.
Business and investorsCapital and competenciesFunding and Scaling.

Other published edition: SPECZASHCHITA Cooperative organization of national and interregional programs Doklad_SPECZASCHITA_Gossovet.docx · web text +

Prepared for consideration at the State Council of the Russian Federation

Initiator: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Editorial Board 2.0 · 24 August 2026

Project for interdepartmental, scientific, business and public discussion

Passport Report

ParameterContents
NameReport "SPECZASHCHITA: cooperative organization of the implementation of national and interregional programs".
StatusStrategic concept; is not a normative act, state program or confirmation of state support.
SubjectOrganization of the full cycle: initiative → Expertise → Co-operation → resources → Pilot → Verification → Scaling.
ArchitectureEQUILIBRIUM - SFERA - ECO - PPA - SPECZASHCHITA.
Territorial modelBiocenosis as a single natural, social, infrastructure and production system.
Pilot bundleSyzran - Rameno - Smolkino; sites and authorities require documentary confirmation.
Horizon2026–2028 years; first 12 monthly implementation plan consisting of 18 monthly full pilot cycle.
Key resultProven model of cooperative performance, suitable for reproduction in other subjects of the Russian Federation.

Contents

  • 1. Summary for decision
  • 2. Systemic problem
  • 3. Mission, vision and strategic objective
  • 3.1. Civilization Horizon: Earth Revival and Galactic Culture
  • 4. Architecture of a single system
  • 5. Place in the contours of public power
  • 6. Nineteen co-operative sites
  • 7. Life cycle of projects
  • 8. Management system
  • 9. Economic model
  • 10. Digital circuit EQUILIBRIUM
  • 11. Biocenoses and monitoring of the territory
  • 12. Advanced Technology Portfolio
  • 13. Pilot Syzran — Rameno — Smolkino
  • 14. Interaction with State Council Commissions
  • 15. Partner Outline
  • 16. System of indicators
  • 17. Risks and protective mechanisms
  • 18. Road map 2026–2028
  • 19. Proposed solutions
  • Annexes

1. Summary for decision

“SPECZASHCHITA” is proposed to be considered as a cooperation platform for execution, which gathers enterprises, scientific organizations, technology teams, financial partners, development institutions, regions, municipalities and public initiatives for a specific socially significant task.

The key problem that SPECZASHCHITA solves is the lack of a continuous chain between initiative, government priority, prepared demand, technology, manufacturer, resources, pilot territory and confirmed result.

SPECZASHCHITA shall not replace the Government, ministries, regions, municipalities, customers, supervisory authorities or development institutions. Its function is to link the legal powers and competencies of participants in a managed project chain, ensure the passage of control points and form evidence of the result.

Proposed action

  1. Accept the report for inter-commission and inter-agency consideration.
  2. Create a working group on integrated sustainable development of territories on the basis of ECO-PPA.
  3. Conduct an independent legal, financial, scientific, technical and environmental examination of the model.
  4. To select 3–5 pilot territories, including the readiness test of the Syzran-Rameno-Smolkino link.
  5. To fix the basic indicators before the start of implementation and provide independent verification.
  6. Following the results of the pilot, submit proposals on scaling to the Presidium of the State Council.

2. Systemic problem

Major development programs are distributed among a variety of departments, levels of government, enterprises, sources of financing and accounting systems. As a result, even promising initiatives often do not get a full route before implementation.

GapManifestationConsequence
CoordinatingParticipants operate in different regulations and do not see a common responsibility architecture.The deadlines are growing, decisions are duplicated, responsibility is blurred.
TrustThere is no single register of resources, obligations, rights and results achieved.The partners cannot assess the real state of the project.
Project ReadinessThe idea is not transformed into a passport, feasibility study, risk and financial model.Banks, government and investors are not ready to make a decision.
Industrial implementationDevelopment is not related to the manufacturer, customer and operating system.The technology is still in the demonstration phase.
FinanceSources of resources are not collected in an acceptable and transparent structure.The pilot does not start or becomes dependent on a single source.
EvidenceThe effect is measured after the project starts or only declaratively.It is impossible to objectively evaluate the result and scale the solution.

3. Mission, vision and strategic objective

Vision

SPECZASHCHITA becomes a trusted circuit of execution of socially significant programs, in which each resource receives a clear role, each obligation is fixed, each participant understands the boundaries of responsibility, and the result is confirmed by documents, tests and data.

Strategic objective

To create a replicable model of the project portfolio formation, launch of territorial pilots and scaling of proven solutions through cooperation of the state, business, science and society.

Basic principles

PrinciplePractical meaning
Common Sense and JusticeThe decision is evaluated by the consequences for the person, territory, nature and system.
LegalityEach mechanism is subject to verification of compliance with applicable law.
VoluntaryThe participant understands the rights, obligations, risks, conditions and procedure for exit.
Authority and responsibilityThe powers correspond to the competences and the responsibility assumed.
EvidenceThe claimed effect is confirmed by indicators, documents, tests and independent verification.
TransparencyResources, obligations, statuses and decisions are traceable.
Conservation of NatureThe effects are taken into account on the full life cycle.
Human-centerednessThe quality of the environment and the real capabilities of a person are subject to assessment, not their dignity.
ScalabilityThe pilot is initially designed to be replicated in another territory.

3.1. Civilization Horizon: Earth Revival and Galactic Culture

The long-term philosophy of SPECZASHCHITA is that the protection of the territory is not limited to the elimination of individual accidents and shortages. The ultimate goal is to restore the Earth’s ability to sustain life, develop a culture of responsible creation, and include humanity in a long-term cosmic perspective.

ConceptContents of the reportPractical translation
Conglomerate "Revival of the Earth"Planetary cooperation of people, states, science, business and public initiatives for the sake of restoring natural systems.Biocenoses, climate and environmental adaptation, restoration of water, soils, forests and environmental quality.
The Interstellar AllianceForesight model of future cooperation of civilization in scientific, space, cultural and humanitarian spheres.Development of space science, aerospace monitoring, planetary security and international scientific cooperation.
Galactic Federation of LightThe author’s philosophical and symbolic image of ethical civilization based on the dignity of life, knowledge, responsibility and non-violence.Values: protection of life, peaceful cooperation, priority of knowledge, responsibility and long-term consequences.
General Plan for the Establishment of Galactic CultureThe long-term cultural and civilizational framework of the transition from divided consumption to a culture of preservation of life, knowledge and creative cooperation.Education, culture, scientific diplomacy, heritage preservation, ethics of technology and preparation of mankind for the space age.

Three horizons of implementation

HorizonPeriod and subjectMeasurable result
Earthly2026–2035: Biocenoses, Environmental Recovery, Energy and Infrastructure Sustainability.Working territorial systems and confirmed improvement of the environment.
Planetary2035–2050: Global Monitoring, International Programs, Culture of Peace and Responsibility for the Biosphere.Compatible early warning systems, scientific standards and international pilots.
SpaceAfter 2050: Space Science, Heritage Preservation, Interaction Ethics, and the Long-Term Culture of Civilization.Scientifically and legally sound programs of peaceful space cooperation.

4. Architecture of a single system

ContourMain roleWithdrawal
SFERAA common space of initiatives, competencies, public participation and communication.Flow of initiatives, participants, knowledge, feedback.
EQUILIBRIUMObservation, analytics, forecasting, digital twin and verification.Territory passports, scripts, indicators, archive of evidence.
IACStrategic expertise and institutional design.Reports, solutions, interdepartmental models.
ECO‑PPAMechanism for mobilizing public and private resources and securing commitments.Programme, financial and contractual framework.
SPECZASHCHITACo-operative organization of execution.Consortiums, production, supply, implementation, operation, scaling.
Independent verificationVerification of data, results, compliance with criteria and conflicts of interest.Conclusion on the effect achieved and residual risks.

Limits of roles

  • EQUILIBRIUM does not replace state information systems, accounting, tax, banking or official statistical accounting.
  • ECO-PPA does not create financial obligations without proper contracts, powers, expertise and sources of security.
  • SPECZASHCHITA does not assume the powers of state authorities, customers, supervisory authorities and technology owners.
  • SFERA does not replace official public discussion and decision-making procedures.
  • Critical decisions retain human control and legally defined responsibility.

5. Place in the contours of public power

LevelFunctionCommunication with SPECZASHCHITA
President of the Russian FederationIdentifying strategic priorities and tasks.SPECZASHCHITA performs only the tasks within the limits of contracts and powers.
The State CouncilHarmonization of federal, regional and municipal development contours.Consideration of the interregional model and results of pilots.
Government of the Russian FederationOrganization of public policy and inter-agency coordination.Definition of the federal coordinator, regulations and support measures.
Federal executive authoritiesIndustry policy, regulation, government programs.Expertise, regulatory support and participation in profile projects.
Subjects of the Russian FederationRegional policy and pilot leadership.Governor's headquarters, sites, regional resources and indicators.
MunicipalitiesPreparation of facilities, work with the population, operation.Municipal project office and territory passport.
Federal AssemblyLegislative and budgetary support.Preparation of regulatory decisions after confirmation of the need by the pilot.

6. Nineteen co-operative sites

Target architecture SPECZASHCHITA includes 19 cooperative sites. This is a working project model: before inclusion in the statutory and corporate documents, the list must be compared with the current organizational structure and approved in the prescribed manner.

№Cooperative local unitMain functionsResult
1Strategic management and programmingObjectives, scenarios, priorities, connection with state strategies.Strategy and program portfolio.
2Project office and portfolio managementPassporting, staging, charts, dependencies, control points.Managed portfolio of projects.
3Law and corporate governanceLegal models, powers, contracts, rights, compliance.Legally enforceable design.
4Finance, treasury and investment trainingBudgets, separate accounting, feasibility studies, sources, risks, reporting.A controlled and controlled project.
5Energy and Mini-GenerationLocal sources, reservation, accumulation, energy service.Reliable power supply to the pilot.
6Environmental technologies and eco-modulesModular solutions for water, waste, environment and life support.A fast measurable environmental impact.
7Water, soils and land restorationMonitoring, cleaning, reclamation, restoration of natural capital.Restored functions of the territory.
8Agro-industry and biocenosesClosed cycles, agroecology, food sustainability.A living territorial system.
9Materials and industrial cooperationMaterials science, components, localization, production chains.Mass production and reduction of dependence.
10Construction and infrastructureDesign, land, networks, construction, commissioning and operation.Ready facilities and infrastructure.
11Digital platform, registries and dataArchitecture EQUILIBRIUM, passports, solution log, accesses.Traceability and digital evidence.
12Research and testingR&D, readiness levels, testing programs and expert opinions.Confirmed performance.
13Standardization, metrology and certificationMeasurement methods, standards, confirmation of conformity.Comparable and reproducible results.
14Security, Sustainability and Risk ManagementPhysical, information, environmental and operational sustainability.Risk register and response plans.
15Logistics and supplySupply, warehousing, transportation, backup chains.Timely provision of projects.
16Education and personnel reserveTraining of operators, engineers, managers and municipal teams.Competent personnel for operation.
17Social programmes and rehabilitationHealth, accessibility, employment, support for families and veterans.Confirmed social impact.
18International Cooperation and ExportPartnerships, adaptation of standards, export of technologies and models.Scaling on the outer contour.
19Communication, public participation and scalingSFERA, public feedback, replication of practices.Trust, participation and sustainable demand.

Grouping of sites

ContourSitesPurpose
Strategic and Legal1–4Purpose, Portfolio, Law, Finance and Responsibility.
Technological and territorial5–10Energy, ecology, water, biocenoses, materials and infrastructure.
Evidence and protection11–14Data, science, standards, safety and risk.
Providing and social15–19Logistics, personnel, social programs, international development and participation.

7. Life cycle of projects

StageKey issueMandatory exitDecision on transition
1. RegistrationWhat is offered, by whom and for what territory?Passport of initiative.Allow to qualify or return for revision.
2. QualificationsDoes the initiative meet the goals and limitations?Qualifying card.Allow for examination or rejection.
3. ExpertiseIs the decision valid and confirmed?Integrated conclusion.Structure or stop.
4. StructuringWho, what, under what conditions and for whose risk does it do?Consortium, contractual and financial model.Launch pilot training.
5. PilotDoes the solution work in real conditions?Object, protocols, operation data.Continue, adjust or stop.
6. VerificationIs the claimed effect confirmed?Independent report and residual risks.Allow for replication.
7. ScalingCan the result be reproduced?Standard package of implementation and operation.Incorporate it into an interregional program.

8. Management system

OrganCompetenceLimitation
General Meeting of MembersQuestions referred by law and by statute to the highest authority.It is not replaced by project bodies.
The Cooperative CouncilStrategy, programs, portfolio, key partnerships.It does not interfere with independent verification.
Executive DirectorateOperational management, coordination, contracts, reporting.It operates in approved budgets and mandates.
Project CommitteeQualification, admission, prioritization, stage control.Decisions are recorded; conflicts of interest are disclosed.
Scientific and Technical CouncilScientific validity, technological readiness, testing.It does not confirm financial or legal viability.
Investment and Finance CommitteeFinancial model, sources, risks, financing conditions.It does not guarantee profitability without verification and contract.
Audit and Compliance ContourFinancial control, targeted use, counterparties.organizationally separated from the actors.
Social and Expert CouncilTerritory interests, feedback, public control.It does not replace formal authority and supervision.

Regional level

  • The governor's or interagency headquarters is the political and managerial coordination of the pilot.
  • Regional project office - schedule, budget, data, participants and control points.
  • Municipal office - land, facilities, permits, interaction with the population and exploitation.
  • Territorial Public Expert Council - feedback and assessment of consequences.

9. Economic model

SPECZASHCHITA can combine several types of resource support only if they are legally permissible, transparent origin and separate accounting.

Source / toolPermissible applicationCondition
Mutual and earmarked contributionsOrganizational and project support within the charter.The decision of the authorized body and the target accounting.
Revenue from supplies and servicesDelivery, service, project management, operation.Market and contractually defined conditions.
Grants, grants, support measuresR&D, pilots, infrastructure, training.Compliance with the terms of provision and reporting.
Banking and project financingCapital expenditures and working capital.Feasibility study, security, risk model and payment source.
PPPs and concessionsInfrastructure and long-term operation.Competition and regulatory procedures.
Investment agreementsTechnological and production projects.Disclosure of conditions, rights and risk allocation.
Contribution of equipment, rights, labor and competenciesCo-operation participation.Independent evaluation of significant non-monetary contributions.

Basic financial rules

  • Separate accounting for each project.
  • Targeted use of funds and resources.
  • Phased funding by reference points.
  • Risk reservation and action plan for deviations.
  • Independent valuation of significant assets and rights.
  • Control of interdependent transactions and conflicts of interest.
  • Verification of the origin of funds and business reputation of counterparties.
  • Regular management and financial reporting.

10. Digital circuit EQUILIBRIUM

EQUILIBRIUM creates an institutional digital twin of the program: connects goals, objects, participants, authorities, projects, contracts, resources, risks, indicators and evidence in a single model.

Register / functionContentsManagement result
Participants and credentialsOrganizations, persons, competencies, roles, admissions.It is clear who has the right to make a decision and do the work.
Initiatives and projectsPassports, stages, dependencies, deadlines, budgets.A single picture of the portfolio.
TechnologyRights, level of readiness, testing, restrictions.Reducing technological risk.
Treaties and obligationsSubject, responsible, terms, conditions of transition.Traceable liability.
ResourcesFinance, equipment, materials, labor, data.Control the availability and movement of resources.
Risks and incidentsRisk, owner, probability, consequences, measures.Early warning and adjustment.
Indicators and evidenceBase line, target, source, frequency, verifier.Confirmation of the result.
Archive of decisionsProtocols, bases, versions, changes.Institutional memory and audit.

11. Biocenoses and monitoring of the territory

The biocenosis is proposed to be used as a basic territorial unit ECO-PPA: not a separate object, but a related system of nature, man, infrastructure, production, energy and data. Stability is formed not by the number of disparate objects, but by the quality of connections and the closedness of flows.

The contour of biocenosisSubject of managementExample of result
NaturalWater, soil, forest, biodiversity.Restored ecosystem functions.
EnergeticMini-generation, accumulation, reservation.Reliable and economical supply.
WaterCleaning, circulation, discharges, water balance.Reducing consumption and pollution.
FoodAgroecology, local chains, biomass.food sustainability.
Housing and socialHealthy environment, services, safety, accessibility.Improving the quality of life.
ProductionMaterials, repair, return to the cycle, waste.Resource efficiency and localization.
DigitalSensors, passports, models, forecasts.Early Warning and Evidence.

Biocenosis monitoring point

The biocenous monitoring point is the "digital sense organ" of the territory. It combines observation of the atmosphere, water, soil, plants, animals, microorganisms, human health and man-made load.

  1. What is happening in the territory?
  2. Is the change natural or dangerous?
  3. What is the likely source of impact?
  4. How does change affect biocenosis and humans?
  5. What actions are necessary and who should perform them?

12. Advanced Technology Portfolio

Below are the candidate directions. Their inclusion in the state or investment contour is possible only after confirmation of owners, rights, readiness of technology, testing, economy, security and compliance with requirements.

Area of workPurposeVerification required
Eco-modulesModular provision of water, environment, waste, food and local infrastructure.Composition of modules, manufacturers, certificates, cost, operation.
Mini-GenerationLocal energy, reservation and sustainability of objects.Technology, fuel/resource, connection, tariff and energy service model.
Water treatment and circulationReduce consumption, pollution and health risks.Water quality, productivity, consumables, sludge disposal.
Soil and soil restorationRehabilitation, stabilization and site preparation.Material composition, environmental safety, testing and durability.
Materials science and high purity productsLocalization of strategic materials and components.Rights, technology, raw materials, quality, market, seriality.
Processing of lithium-containing and other complex wasteReturn of valuable materials and reduction of environmental load.Licenses, Technology, Product Output, Economy, Security.
Digital monitoringObservation, prognosis, diagnosis and verification.Data quality, metrology, cybersecurity, GIS compatibility.

13. Pilot Syzran — Rameno — Smolkino

Appointment of pilot

Check the full cycle SPECZASHCHITA in interconnected areas: from the passport of problems and resources to the cooperative implementation, operation, effect measurement and preparation of a standard scaling package.

Minimum package of readiness — 11 positions

  1. The passport of each territory and the baseline.
  2. Letters of interest and responsible bodies/organizations.
  3. Confirmation of rights to land, facilities and infrastructure.
  4. The list of 3–5 priority projects for the first stage.
  5. Passports of technology, owners of rights and level of readiness.
  6. Preliminary project consortia and allocation of responsibility.
  7. Financial model, sources of resources and risk allocation.
  8. Legal map of permits, procurements, contracts and regulations.
  9. 12 is a monthly implementation plan with control points.
  10. Method of measuring environmental, social and economic effect.
  11. Criteria for the completion of the pilot and access to scaling.

Temporary model

PeriodContentsResult
0–3 monthsVerification of sites, passports, examination, basic indicators, contractual model.The decision to launch.
4–6 monthsDesign, procurement, preparation of production and construction cooperation.Ready to implement.
7–12 monthsInstallation, start-up, training, primary operation, data collection.Working solutions and first assessment.
13–18 monthsStabilization of operation, independent verification, adjustment and typing.Report and scaling package.

14. Interaction with State Council Commissions

The presenter is invited to determine the State Council commission on the direction "Environmental well-being". The program requires inter-commission assembly, as it connects natural, energy, industrial, infrastructure, digital, financial and social tasks.

CommissionItem SPECZASHCHITAProposed outcome
Environmental Well-beingECO-PPA, biocenoses, ecomodules, restoration of territories.Leading Commission and Interregional Environmental Pilot.
EnergyMini-generation, accumulation, reservation.The pilot's energy circuit.
IndustryCooperation of enterprises, equipment, localization.Register of producers and cooperation order.
Technological leadershipEQUILIBRIUM, new materials, technologies and R&D.Independent examination and testing program.
Infrastructure for LifeIntegrated development of territories and eco-modules.Integration into master plans and infrastructure projects.
InvestmentsPPP, concessions, project and bank financing.The financial model of the pilot.
Data EconomyDigital passports, monitoring and proof.Data requirements and digital circuit.
Public and municipal administrationRegulations of federal, regional and municipal interaction.Model of project headquarters and responsibility.
WorkforcePreparation of design, engineering and municipal teams.Personnel program of operation.
A Long and Active LifeEnvironmental health, rehabilitation and quality of life.Social block of indicators.
International Cooperation and ExportCirculation of technologies and methods.The prepared external contour after the Russian pilot.

Proposed working group

"ECO-PPA - complex sustainable development of the territories of the Russian Federation" - an inter-commission and interdepartmental working group with the participation of the Government, relevant departments, pilot regions, science, business and public organizations.

  • The head is the chairman of the profile commission of the State Council.
  • Deputy from the federal center is a representative of the Government of the Russian Federation.
  • Deputy from the regions is the head of the pilot entity.
  • The executive secretary is a representative of the State Council or the Presidential Administration.
  • SPECZASHCHITA - candidate for the functions of a cooperation project office after a comprehensive audit.

15. Partner Outline

ParticipantProposed roleRequired design
RF CCIBusiness and industrial contour, regional chambers, cooperation of enterprises.Agreement, working group, register of enterprises and requests.
ASISelection of initiatives, regional practices, pilot support and scaling.Expert review and passport initiatives.
RSPPLarge business, industry associations, industrial cooperation.Industry session and pool of partners.
RAS, universities, research centersScientific expertise, research, testing, methods.Technical tasks and independent opinions.
Development institutionsFunding, guarantees, support measures, project preparation.Compliance with the mandate and requirements of a particular institution.
Banks and investorsProject financing and risk assessment.Bankable package and independent verification.
Regions and municipalitiesOrder, sites, headquarters, operation and data.Decisions of authorized bodies and project agreements.
Public organizations and SFERAInitiatives, citizen participation, feedback and control.Participation rules and protection of personal data.

16. System of indicators

Each project receives a baseline, target value, data source, measurement frequency, indicator owner and independent verifier. The set of indicators is formed in proportion to the scale and risks of the project.

GroupExamples of indicatorsPurpose
NatureWater and soil quality, emissions, waste, biodiversity, reclaimed area.Confirmation of the environmental effect.
Resources and energyLocal generation, reliability, water reuse, material return.Assessment of resource sustainability.
EconomyInvestment, localization, jobs, productivity, life cycle cost.Assessment of economic viability.
PersonSafety, health of the environment, accessibility of services, training, participation of residents.Evaluation of social outcome.
ManagementTiming, budget, data quality, performance, incidents.Assessment of manageability and trust.

17. Risks and protective mechanisms

RiskManifestationProtective mechanism
LegalThe stated powers, rights or mechanisms are not formalized.Legal card, verification of powers, contracts, permits.
ReputationalIt gives the impression of already received state support.The exact designation of the status of the concept; a ban on unconfirmed formulations.
TechnologicalThe claimed characteristics are not confirmed in real conditions.Testing, control group, independent scientific and technical council.
FinancialLack of funds, overestimation, cash gap.Phased funding, independent evaluation, reserve and scenarios.
Conflict of interestOne participant simultaneously sells, evaluates and confirms the result.Separation of the owner, operator, customer, investor and verifier.
DataIncomplete, non-comparable or dependent data.Metrology, source passport, quality control, change log.
EnvironmentalUnexpected negative impact.Life cycle assessment, monitoring, stop and recovery plan.
OperationDisruption of supplies, personnel or deadlines.Standby suppliers, personnel reserve, critical way management.
SocialLack of trust of residents or uneven distribution of benefits.Early participation, public control, transparent outcome criteria.
ScalingThe pilot works only in unique conditions.Typing, tolerability analysis, operating regulations.

Conditions of admission to the state pilot

  • Legal entity, powers and corporate decisions are confirmed.
  • The rights to technologies, assets, data and equipment have been confirmed.
  • The customer, operator, performers, owners, investors and verifiers are determined.
  • The basic indicators and the method of calculating the effect before the start of work are fixed.
  • Purchases and selection of performers in accordance with applicable law.
  • The budget, sources of funds, reserves and the procedure for termination of the project are formed.
  • Independent audit, compliance and public reporting are provided.

18. Road map 2026–2028

PeriodKey actionsBenchmark
III-IV quarters 2026Inventory of participants, documents, technologies and pilot territories; creation of a project office; preliminary examination.Verified basic package and decision on admission to preparation.
I-II quarters 2027Formation of inter-commission group; choice of 3–5 territories; passports and basic indicators; contractual and financial model.Approved Pilot Passports.
III-IV quarters 2027Design, manufacture, procurement, construction and launch of the first stage; team training.Working Objects and Primary Data.
I-II quarters 2028Operation, adjustment, independent verification and assessment of portability.Confirmed report on results and risks.
III-IV quarters 2028Preparation of standard packages, proposals for regulatory support and financing; consideration at the Presidium of the State Council.Decision on federal scale.

19. Proposed solutions

  1. Accept this report for consideration by the relevant commissions of the State Council.
  2. Support an inter-commission strategic session on the model ECO‑PPA and SPECZASHCHITA.
  3. Instruct to form an interagency working group and identify a federal coordinator.
  4. Conduct a comprehensive independent examination of the organization, technologies, rights, assets, financial model and pilot sites.
  5. Select 3–5 pilot territories and form their passports.
  6. Approve uniform requirements for data, indicators, verification and public reporting.
  7. Develop a procedure for financing pilots with risk sharing and milestones.
  8. Submit an interim report six months after the launch of the implementation.
  9. At the end of the 18-month cycle, submit proposals for federal scaling.

Annex 1. Draft instructions

  1. The Government of the Russian Federation, together with the relevant commissions of the State Council, should consider the concept of an interregional program for integrated sustainable development of territories on the basis of ECO-PPA.
  2. Determine the federal coordinating body and the composition of the interdepartmental working group.
  3. Ensure independent legal, financial, scientific, technical and environmental examination of materials SPECZASHCHITA.
  4. Submit proposals on the list of pilot subjects of the Russian Federation and the criteria for their selection.
  5. Approve requirements to passports of territories, technologies, financial models, data and verification.
  6. Ensure the formation of digital monitoring of pilot projects in compliance with information security and data legislation.
  7. Report on pilot readiness and necessary regulatory decisions.
  8. After piloting, submit proposals on scaling proven solutions.

Annex 2. The Responsibility Matrix

ParticipantResponsibilityResult
President / State CouncilStrategic decision, coordination of levels of public power.Political and management mandate.
The Russian GovernmentInter-agency coordination and regulatory support.The agreed program.
Profile departmentsIndustry expertise and government measures.Regulatory and program support.
GovernorsManagement of regional pilots.Achievement of territorial indicators.
MunicipalitiesSites, facilities, interaction with residents, operation.Working solutions in the territory.
ECO‑PPAProgrammatic, resource and contractual framework.Collected commitments and resources.
SPECZASHCHITAEnforcement cooperation and implementation management.Delivery, construction, launch, service.
EQUILIBRIUMData, analytics, forecasting and archive of evidence.Tracked result.
SFERAInitiatives, public participation and communication.Feedback and trust.
Science and Independent AuditVerification of technology, methods and results.Evidence and risk reduction.
Business and investorsCapital, technology, production and competence.Funding and Scaling.

Annex 3. Next level documents package

  • Charter and corporate decisions on target model SPECZASHCHITA.
  • Organizational structure and regulations of governing bodies.
  • Register of members, participants, partners, competencies and powers.
  • Regulations on 19 cooperative sites.
  • Methods of qualification and admission of projects.
  • Regulations on the project committee and scientific and technical council.
  • Conflict of interest, compliance and counterparty verification policy.
  • Financial policy, treasury and separate accounting.
  • Architecture EQUILIBRIUM, data model and information security requirements.
  • Register of technologies with rights, readiness, tests and certificates.
  • Passports of pilot territories and 3–5 projects of the first stage.
  • Financial model, sources of funds and risk allocation.
  • Method of assessment of environmental, social and economic effect.
  • Regulations on independent verification.
  • Draft agreement on inter-commission and inter-agency working group.

Annex 4. Defined and requires confirmation

Defined by conceptRequires confirmation and registration
Mission, principles and role of the cooperative organization of execution.Exact organizational and legal structure and compliance with the current charter.
Architecture EQUILIBRIUM - SFERA - ECO - PPA - SPECZASHCHITA.Rights, owners, integration agreements and data regimes.
The list of 19 cooperative sites as a working model.Corporate Approval, Regulations, Managers and Resources.
Semi-annual life cycle of projects.Regulations, forms of documents and powers of admission authorities.
Pilot bundle Syzran - Rameno - Smolkino.Platforms, Interest, Rights, Objects and Responsible.
Directions: eco-modules, mini-generation, biocenoses, materials and monitoring.Specific technologies, owners, characteristics, tests and economics.
Route through the State Council Commission.Approval of commissions, federal coordinator and pilot regions.
The principle of independent verification.Validating organizations, accreditation, methods and funding of verification.

Final position

The proposed path is not to start with a declaration of federal status, but with a comprehensive check, limited pilot, independent measurement and proven result. It is this consistency that creates trust and turns the concept into a development institution.

Other published edition: SPECZASHCHITA Prezentaciya_SPECZASCHITA_Gossovet.pptx · Web Text +

Cooperative organization of national and interregional programs

SFERA Collects Initiatives. EQUILIBRIUM Confirms.

ECO-PPA forms a framework. SPECZASHCHITA organizes execution.

Full presentation to the strategic report · 24 August 2026

The main request is to open an institutional route

STRATEGIC REPORT

Not an exceptional status, but a verifiable path from initiative to scaling.

  • Consider the concept of specialized commissions of the State Council.
  • Form an inter-commission and inter-agency working group.
  • Check the organization, technology, rights, economy and pilot sites.
  • Launch a limited pilot with independent indicators and milestone solutions.

The result of the discussion: to agree on the working process, admission criteria and pilot format.

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

The gap between initiative and execution

STRATEGIC REPORT

Publicly relevant solutions often exist separately: priority, demand, technology, manufacturer, financing and territory are not assembled into one chain of responsibility.

No single customer result

Control points not defined

Resources and risks are not shared

Consequence

Pilots do not reach operation, the effects are not confirmed, and replication occurs without a single standard of evidence.

Evidence not collected in the archive

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

The four circuits form a single execution system

STRATEGIC REPORT

SFERA

EQUILIBRIUM

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

Initiatives, competences, public participation

Data, scenarios, risks, independent evidence

Programme, resource and contractual framework

Executor cooperation, implementation and scaling

Initiative → Expertise → Co-operation → resource → Pilot → Confirmed result → Scaling

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

SPECZASHCHITA binds powers, but does not replace power

STRATEGIC REPORT

Is

Not

  • Cooperation platform for a specific socially significant task.
  • Project outline with tolerance, control points and responsible.
  • Organizer of the performance from the preparation of the site to the service.
  • The evidence provider for the scaling decision.
  • A new authority or superstructure over the Government and the regions.
  • Owner of all technologies of assets, rights and decisions of participants.
  • The source of automatic financing without expertise and contract.
  • Confirmation of state support before the official decision of the competent authorities.

The basic principle: the powers remain with the legitimate owners, the liability is fixed by the contract.

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

The model is built into the existing contour of public power

STRATEGIC REPORT

President of the Russian Federation

Strategic Priorities and Assignments

The State Council

Inter-level coordination and coordination of pilots

Government and Federal Agencies

Industry expertise, regulation and programmes

Subjects of the Russian Federation

Governor's headquarters, sites, resources and indicators

Municipalities

Facilities preparation, resident management and operation

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Environmental well-being — leading commission

STRATEGIC REPORT

Energy

Lead Commission

mini-generation, accumulation, reservation

Ecological

Well-being

Industry

localization, production cooperation, materials

ECO-PPA, biocenoses, restoration of territories, ecosystem indicators and interregional environmental pilot.

Technological leadership

testing, maturity, data, digital twin

Infrastructure for Life

facilities, municipal operation, quality of environment

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

The State Council’s route translates the concept into testable solutions

STRATEGIC REPORT

Governor

Commission

Working Group

Selection of pilots

initiates and confirms the site

Conducting a profile review

Gathers departments and experts

Approves criteria and passports

Scaling

Commissions

Presidency

Evaluation

replicates proven solutions

Establishing accountability and deadlines

Consider the pilot's results

checks the result and residual risks

Each transition requires a document responsible and a decision to continue, adjust or stop.

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Nineteen sites close the full cycle of cooperation

COOPERATIVE ARCHITECTURE · 1/2

Strategic management

Production cooperation

goals, scenarios, priorities

Localization and supply chains

Project Office

Engineering and construction

portfolio, charts, control points

design, installation, input

Legal and Corporate Outline

Operation and service

Charter, contracts, rights, compliance

training, regulations, repair

Sectoral programmes

Digital platform

Assembly of cross-industry solutions

registers, statuses, archive of decisions

Scientific and technical expertise

Monitoring and verification

testing, maturity, tolerance

indicators and independent report

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Plots 11-19 provide resource, territory and development

COOPERATIVE ARCHITECTURE · 2/2

Financial and investment contour

Public participation

model, sources, treasury

feedback and trust

Development institutions

Communications

Support measures and guarantees

Public Reporting and Reputation

Regional headquarters

International cooperation

sites, resources, coordination

scientific and technological partnerships

Municipal Design Offices

facilities, residents, operation

Reserve and special projects

new tasks after separate admission

Personnel and education

training of teams and operators

Each site receives regulations, managers, resources and indicators.

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Seven stages do not allow the project to skip the test

STRATEGIC REPORT

Initiative

Qualification

Expertise

Assembly

Pilot

Verification

Scale

Problem and applicant

Completeness and Conformity

Law, technology, economics

Cooperation and treaties

Working in real conditions

Independent effect

Standard implementation package

Financing of the next stage is opened only after confirmation of the control point of the previous one.

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Management shares strategy, execution and verification

STRATEGIC REPORT

Corporate Outline

Project domain

Independent contour

General Meeting

The Cooperative Council

Executive Directorate

Project Committee

Programme managers

Regional headquarters

Scientific and Technical Council

Validators

Audit and public control

Conflict of interest

Separate accounting

Verity of decisions

Public reporting

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

The economy is built on stages and distributes risk

STRATEGIC REPORT

Sources

Tools

Rules

  • Budget programs
  • development institutions
  • private investment
  • Funds of participants
  • targeted loans and leasing
  • project financing
  • energy service and service contracts
  • concessions and PPPs - where applicable
  • R&D grants
  • phased purchase of the result
  • Separate accounting
  • Phased opening of funds
  • Cost of the full life cycle
  • Distribution of risks by contract
  • Termination in case of unproven

Prior to the examination, you can not fix the amount of funding, profitability or federal obligations.

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

EQUILIBRIUM makes the bases of decisions traceable

STRATEGIC REPORT

Profile

Scenario

Risk

Implementation

Archive

evidence

territory, object, right

goal, base line, options

owner, probability, measures

status, budget, incidents

source, period, verifier

Single ID

Versionality

A man makes a decision

Linking the object,

contracts and data

retains the basis

each change

Analytics Explained

consequences

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Biocenosis - the basic unit of territorial result

STRATEGIC REPORT

Sustainability is not created by the number of individual objects, but by the quality of the connections between nature, man, infrastructure, production, energy and data.

  • Natural contour: water, soil, forest, biodiversity.
  • Energy: local generation, accumulation, reserve.
  • Production: resources, waste, materials, service.
  • Social: environmental health, services, employment, participation.
  • Digital: monitoring, forecasting, early warning.

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Technology portfolio preliminary - admission only through verification

STRATEGIC REPORT

Areas

Verification Gateway

  • Ecomodules and natural systems restoration
  • mini-generation, accumulation and reservation
  • water, air and waste management
  • new materials and local production
  • Digital twins and territorial monitoring
  • Social infrastructure and educational modules

rights holder and contracts

level of technological readiness

Testing and Certification

Life Cycle Economics

Environmental and Industrial Safety

Production and service readiness

An unconfirmed characteristic is not included in the pilot's passport.

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Pilot Syzran — Rameno — Smolkino designed for 18 months

STRATEGIC REPORT

Syzran

Rameno

Smolkino

0-3 months

4-6 months

7-12 months

13-18 months

Verification of sites, rights, source data and contractual model

Design, procurement and preparation of cooperation

Installation, start-up, training and primary operation

Stabilization, independent evaluation and scaling package

Prior to launch, confirm: sites, rights, responsible, 3-5 projects of the first stage, indicators, budget, security, data and independent verifier.

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

260

STRATEGIC REPORT

Measurement connects territory, person and management

A relevant sub-selection of indicators is selected for the pilot; the full standard does not apply automatically.

Human Development Standards

Measurable indicators in a complete system

Priority projects of the first stage

Assessment groups: ecology · energy · economy · people · management

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Roadmap 2026-2028 translates concept into standard package

STRATEGIC REPORT

2026

2027

2028

Inspection and assembly

Piloting

Verification and scale

statutory model, working group, registers, pilot criteria

3-5 projects, launch of facilities, operation data, interim evaluation

independent report, model package, proposals for an interregional program

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Galactic culture is a long-term foresight, not the basis of state decisions

STRATEGIC REPORT

The Civilizational Horizon

Earth Revival

Planetary cooperation for the restoration of natural systems

The Interstellar Alliance

The Future of Scientific, Cultural and Space Cooperation

Galactic Federation of Light

The author's symbol of ethical civilization, dignity of life and non-violence

Master Plan

transition from disjointed consumption to a culture of knowledge, preservation of life and responsibility

Boundaries of evidence: titles are authored foresight models; government decisions are not based on unverifiable assumptions.

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Each key risk is matched by a protective mechanism

STRATEGIC REPORT

Risk

How it manifests itself

Protective mechanism

No formal rights or authority

legal card, contracts, permits

Legal

Creates a State Support

The exact status of the concept and the prohibition of unconfirmed statements

Reputational

Features do not work in the field

tests, control points, scientific and technical council

Technological

Costs grow faster than the result

Phased funding and life cycle cost

Financial

incompleteness, leakage or manipulation

Access Roles, Logging, Independent Audit

Data

Decision not made by residents

participation, feedback and public reporting

Social

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

The proposed solution is to test, launch the pilot and measure

STRATEGIC REPORT

Five Actions

Take the report for consideration by the relevant commissions of the State Council.

To hold an inter-commission strategic session and form a working group.

Organize independent legal, financial, scientific, technical and environmental expertise.

To select pilot territories and approve uniform requirements for data, indicators and funding.

After 18 months, submit the result and proposals for scaling proven solutions.

SPECZASHCHITA organizes the execution and transmits to the state the verifiable grounds for the decision on the scale.

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO-PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Sources cited in presentation 4

  • Report "SPECZASHCHITA", edition 2.0, 24.08.2026 (internal conceptual material).
  • The white paper of the cooperative SPECZASHCHITA, version 1.
  • Presentation "Biocenoses ECO-PPA" (internal source).
  • The illustration was created specifically for this presentation.

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

NARRATIVES AND VALUES. EQUILIBRIUM • Architecture 13×20 • Core foundation

Source Status: Primary Document

EQUILIBRIUM • Architecture 13×20 • Core foundation

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/narrativy-i-tsennosti-ekvilibrium-13x20

Open on the site

Methodological document • version 1.0

1. Appointment

The document specifies the meaning layer of the kernel EQUILIBRIUM: a system of values, narratives and measurable features, linking 13 fields of architecture with 20 parameters of development.

The narrative in EQUILIBRIUM is not a slogan or a pressure tool. It is a testable semantic construction that explains the desired direction of development, the basis of choice and the boundaries of what is permissible.

Value is a normative benchmark. Metrics are a way to test whether value is manifested in real institutions, decisions, behaviors, and outcomes.

2. Basic principles

Dynamic equilibrium. the goal is not the same and not averaging, but the steady reconciliation of differences.

Evidence: The narrative must be supported by observable data and results.

Freedom and subjectivity. development should not be replaced by the imposition of the only permissible profile of a person or society.

Multi-level: The same value is manifested in different ways at the level of a person, organization, city, state, and civilization.

Feedback. Any assessment should allow for a review of the new data.

Pole balance. opposites are considered as system stresses; the optimum may not be at the edge of the scale.

3. Thirteen fields EQUILIBRIUM

1. The source is the meaning, the reason, the purpose and the reason for the existence of the system.

2. Consciousness - thinking, perception, reflection, the ability to distinguish and choose.

3. Information - the quality of knowledge, reliability, availability and coherence of data.

4. Energy - resources of action: physical, economic, organizational and human.

5. Time is the horizons of development, continuity, cycles and speed of change.

6. Space - environment, territory, infrastructure, accessibility and connectivity.

7. Nature - ecosystems, biocenoses, resources, restoration and ecological balance.

8. Man is the life, dignity, development, health, freedom and responsibility of the individual.

9. Society is trust, cooperation, justice, solidarity and institutions.

10. Economy - creation and distribution of value, labor, capital, sustainability.

11. Technology: Innovation, security, manageability, and public utility of technology.

12. Culture - meanings, language, memory, creativity, relationships and image of the future.

13. Integrity is the consistency of all fields, the absence of destructive breaks and the ability of the system to self-correct.

4. Twenty Value Axes and Basic Narratives

№AxisValueBasic narrativeAnti-narrative / risk
1Meaning ↔ VoidMeaningfulnessActions and institutions must be linked to an understandable social and human purpose.Substitution of the goal by formal activity, ritual or information noise.
2Truth ↔ IllusionCredibilityDecisions are based on verifiable facts, open reasoning and willingness to correct errors.Manipulation of facts, concealment of essential information, refusal to check.
3Development ↔ DegradationDevelopmentThe system should increase the capacity of man, society and the environment, not just the volume of consumption.Increased performance at the cost of loss of competence, health, environment or autonomy.
4Creativity ↔ PassivityCreativityThe person and the organization get space for initiative and creation of new.Suppression of the initiative, waiting for an external indication, punishment for a reasonable experiment.
5Innovation ↔ ReactivityUpdateA new one is accepted when it is demonstrably improving the life and stability of the system.Refusal to change for the sake of maintaining ineffective practices or, conversely, the cult of novelty without benefit.
6Empathy ↔ IndifferenceEmpathyThe decision takes into account the consequences for people, especially for vulnerable groups.Indifference to damage, depersonalization of a person in management decisions.
7The Value of Life ↔Dignity of lifeHuman life and dignity take precedence over the convenience of the system.The permissibility of undue risk, violence or dehumanization for formal purposes.
8Freedom ↔ SubmissionSubjectivityFreedom of choice is combined with clear rules and responsibility for consequences.Arbitrary coercion or freedom without responsibility to others.
9Responsibility ↔ TranslationResponsibilityAuthority, resources and responsibilities must be linked.Translating the consequences down, out or onto an indefinite "other".
10Love ↔ ConsumptionCareRelationships are built on respect, reciprocity and care, not on the use of a person as a resource.The commodification of relationships, man as a means, not a subject.
11Family ↔ SeparationIntergenerational connectivitySustainable forms of mutual care, continuity and intergenerational communication are supported.Breaking social ties, isolation, destruction of support between generations.
12Spirit ↔ MatterIntegrity of ManMaterial well-being is considered together with meaning, ethics, knowledge and internal development.Reduction of development only to material consumption or denial of material living conditions.
13Labor ↔ RentCreating valueRemuneration should be concerned primarily with the creation of useful value, competence and risk.Earnings without a proportionate contribution, closed rents and parasitic mediation.
14Altruism ↔ SelfishnessReciprocityPersonal interest is recognized, but consistent with consequences for others and the common good.Maximizing private profit at the cost of systemic damage or the demand for self-denial of the individual.
15Collective ↔ IndividualismCooperationA strong personality and a strong community are not opposed: cooperation expands the possibilities of everyone.The suppression of the individual by the collective or the disintegration of common responsibility for isolated interests.
16Harmony ↔ ConflictConstructive harmonizationThe conflict is recognized as natural, but is transferred to the procedures of coordination, restoration and joint decision.Silence of contradictions or their transformation into a destructive struggle.
17Sustainability ↔ ChaosResilienceThe system must retain functions in times of crisis, learn and recover.Fragility, dependence on a single point of failure, lack of reserves and feedback.
18Mindfulness ↔ AutomationReflexivityKey actions involve understanding the causes, consequences, and alternatives.Unthinkingly following a pattern, algorithm, tradition, or order.
19Justice ↔ DistortionFairnessThe rules are clear, proportionate, apply consistently and allow for reasonable correction.Privileges without reason, discrimination, opaque distribution of benefits and costs.
20Evolution ↔ StagnationEvolutionaryThe system retains valuable, but constantly improves the ability to respond to new conditions.Freezing the structure, imitating development or destroying continuity for the sake of permanent restructuring.

5. Core: 20 key cells

IDFieldCellKey Narrative
E8.18PersonAwarenessA conscious person is able to understand the reasons for their actions and choose, not just react.
E8.9PersonResponsibilityFreedom of the individual becomes sustainable when it is linked to responsibility for decisions and consequences.
E8.6PersonEmpathyHuman development involves the ability to see in another subject rather than a resource.
E8.8PersonFreedomThe system expands the space of independent choice while preserving the rights of others.
E8.3PersonDevelopmentThe main capital is the growing human abilities: knowledge, health, skill, maturity and creativity.
E2.2ConsciousnessTruthMature consciousness distinguishes between fact, interpretation, persuasion, and manipulation.
E2.18ConsciousnessAwareness of consciousnessThinking must be able to observe one’s own mistakes, biases, and boundaries of knowledge.
E3.2InformationPurity of informationThe information environment is as valuable as it can be to verify the origin, quality and context of data.
E9.19SocietyFairnessPublic trust grows where rules are transparent, rights are protected, and costs and benefits are distributed reasonably.
E9.15SocietyCooperationSociety is stronger when people are able to unite around tasks without destroying individuality.
E9.16SocietyHarmonyDifferences do not have to disappear; it is the task of institutions to turn contradictions into agreed solutions.
E9.7SocietyThe value of lifeThe quality of a society is measured by how much it protects the life, dignity and opportunity of human development.
E10.13EconomyWorkThe economy should reward the creation of useful value, productivity, competence and sound risk.
E10.19EconomyFairness of economyThe economic order is sustainable if access to opportunities and rules of distribution are perceived as sound.
E10.17EconomyResilienceEconomic efficiency should include the ability to survive shocks and not destroy the natural and social basis.
E11.5TechnologyInnovationsTechnology is a development when it enhances the abilities and safety of the person and the system, not just productivity.
E11.18TechnologyAwareness of technologyThe individual must retain the ability to understand, challenge and control critical technological decisions.
E12.1CultureMeaningCulture creates a language through which society understands itself, its past and possible future.
E12.10CultureCare and loveCulture supports respect, reciprocity, dignity and the capacity for long-term relationships.
E13.16IntegrityHarmony of systemDevelopment is considered complete only when the improvement of one field is not achieved by the destruction of the other.

6. Passport Narrative

ID: communication with matrix cell Eᵢⱼ.

Title: Short formulation, clear without methodological commentary.

Value: What regulatory benchmark is protected.

Narrative: what kind of causal picture the system offers.

Anti-narrative: What extreme or distortion is considered a risk.

Object of assessment: person, organization, territory, state, project, program.

Metrics: the observed indicators and their sources.

Evidence: documents, statistics, observations, research, results.

Optimum: Target range, which may differ from 100 and depends on the context.

Dynamics: direction and speed of change.

Intervention risks: Possible side effects of trying to improve performance.

Mechanisms of development: education, incentives, institutions, infrastructure, cooperation, technology.

7. Terms of use

  • Do not rate a person or group by one metric; the profile and context are analyzed.
  • Do not use the index as a basis for deprivation of rights, discrimination or automated punishment.
  • Separate descriptive data and normative assessments: the system is required to show where the fact ends and the interpretation begins.
  • For public and government decisions, disclose methodology, sources, weights, and uncertainties.
  • Retain the right to appeal, alternative interpretation and revision of the assessment.
  • Do not replace development by maximizing a single indicator: the target object is integrity and dynamic equilibrium.

8. Connection to the calculation core

Each cell Eᵢⱼ receives the current value of V, weight W, dynamics D, risk assessment R, and confidence level C. Narrative answers the question “why is it important and what development is considered desirable”, and metrics are “how to check that a change really happened”.

For the next version, it is recommended to supplement the document with full passports of all 20 Core cells: by 5–10 metrics, data sources, thresholds, target ranges, risks and mechanisms of development.

9. Formula of semantic layer

Value → Narrative → Metrics → Proof → Decision → Result → Feedback → Correction.

Other published editorial board: NARRATIVES AND VALUES Narratives_and_values_EQUILIBRIUM_13x20.pptx · web text +

EQUILIBRIUM • Architecture 13×20 • Core foundation

The semantic layer of the system: values → Narratives → metrics → evidence → Solutions → feedback

13 fields

20 axes

260 cells

Methodological presentation • version 1.0

1. What sets the semantic layer

Narratives are not a substitute for data — they link value, proof, and management decision.

Value

Narrative

Metrics

Normative benchmark: what the system considers important and worthy of preservation.

Proven cause-and-effect construction: why it is important and what direction of development is desirable.

An observable indicator by which the manifestation of value in reality is checked.

Evidence

Decision

Feedback

Sources, statistics, studies, documents and observed results.

Acceptable action with context, risks, freedom and side effects.

Reviewing assessment and decision when new data are available.

2. Architecture 13 × 20

13 Fields describe system levels. 20 Value axes are set by the measured voltages within each field.

Istok

Consciousness

Information

Energy

System Field

System Field

System Field

System Field

Time

Space

Nature

Person

System Field

System Field

System Field

System Field

Society

Economy

Technology

Culture

System Field

System Field

System Field

System Field

Integrity

Integral level

Result: 13 × 20 = 260 cells of state. Each cell gets meaning, metrics, weight, dynamics, risk, and level of confidence.

3. Twenty value axes

Not good versus evil, but the controlled stresses of the system. The optimum depends on the context and does not have to be at the edge of the scale.

Meaning ↔ Void

Family ↔ Separation

Truth ↔ Illusion

Spirit ↔ Matter

Development ↔ Degradation

Labor ↔ Rent

Creativity ↔ Passivity

Altruism ↔ Selfishness

Innovation ↔ Reactivity

Collective ↔ Individualism

Empathy ↔ Indifference

Harmony ↔ Conflict

The Value of Life ↔

Sustainability ↔ Chaos

Freedom ↔ Submission

Mindfulness ↔ Automation

Responsibility ↔ Translation

Justice ↔ Distortion

Love ↔ Consumption

Evolution ↔ Stagnation

4. Grouping of values

20 axes can be read as five interrelated contours of development.

Meaning and Knowledge

Meaning • Truth • Awareness • Spirit/matter - Ability to understand purpose, distinguish fact and interpretation, see consequences.

Man and Relationships

Empathy • The value of life • Freedom • Responsibility • Love • Family - Dignity, subjectivity, reciprocity and sustainable human connections.

Building and development

Development • Creativity • Innovation • Labor • Evolution - Building Capabilities and Creating Useful Value.

Society and Justice

Altruism • Collective/individual • Harmony • Justice is the reconciliation of personal interest, cooperation, rules, and the common good.

Sustainability of the system

Sustainability • balance of freedom and order • conflict management - The ability to retain functions, learn, recover, and not destroy one's own foundation.

5. Core: 20 key cells

The minimum semantic contour for the first prototype is EQUILIBRIUM.

Person

Awareness

Society

Harmony

E8.18

E9.16

Person

Responsibility

Society

The value of life

E8.9

E9.7

Person

Empathy

Economy

Work

E8.6

E10.13

Person

Freedom

Economy

Fairness

E8.8

E10.19

Person

Development

Economy

Resilience

E8.3

E10.17

Consciousness

Truth

Technology

Innovations

E2.2

E11.5

Consciousness

Awareness

Technology

Awareness

E2.18

E11.18

Information

Purity of information

Culture

Meaning

E3.2

E12.1

Society

Fairness

Culture

Care and love

E9.19

E12.10

Society

Cooperation

Integrity

Harmony of system

E9.15

E13.16

6. Man is a reference level

Five key cells define a person’s subjectivity and ability to develop.

E8.18 • Awareness

E8.9 • Responsibility

E8.6 •

Understand the reasons for their actions, alternatives and consequences.

Link freedom of choice to the obligations and consequences of decisions.

To see in another subject, to consider the human consequences of decisions.

E8.8 • Freedom

E8.3 •

Having a space for self-choice while preserving the rights of others.

To increase knowledge, health, skill, maturity and creative abilities.

7. Society, Economics and Technology

The core links humanitarian values with real institutions, resources and technical systems.

SOCIETY

ECONOMY

TECHNOLOGIES

E9.19 Fairness

Transparent and reasonable rules.

E9.15 Cooperation

Unification without destroying individuality.

E9.16 Harmony

Translating contradictions into coordination procedures.

E9.7 Value of life

Protection of dignity and development opportunities.

E10.13 Labour

Creating useful value, competence and productivity.

E10.19 Justice

Reasonable access to opportunities and distribution of results.

E10.17 Sustainability

The ability to survive shocks without destroying the social and natural basis.

E11.5 Innovations

Technological improvement confirmed by utility.

E11.18 Awareness

Ability to understand, challenge and control critical decisions of machines and algorithms.

8. Culture and integrity

The semantic layer does not focus on the slogan, but on the coherence of the entire system.

E12.1 • Culture × Meaning

Culture forms the language through which society understands itself, its past and possible future.

E13.16 • Integrity × Harmony of system

Development is considered complete only when the improvement of one field is not achieved by the destruction of the other.

Key test:

• whether there is a hidden transfer of costs;

• does not create a new critical bias;

• whether the ability to self-correct is maintained;

• whether there is a proven feedback.

E12.10 • Culture × Care and love

Respect, reciprocity, dignity and the ability to have long-term relationships become the norm, not a decorative declaration.

9. Passport Narrative

Each narrative should be formalized so that it can be checked and revised.

Cell connection Eᵢⱼ

Metrics

Indicators observed

Name

Short wording

Evidence

Sources, statistics, research

Value

Normative orientation

Optimum

Target range, not automatically 100

Narrative

Causal pattern

Dynamics

Direction and speed of change

Antinarrative

Extremity or distortion

Risks of intervention

Side effects of improving the indicator

Object

Person / organization / territory / state / project

Mechanisms of development

Institutions, education, incentives, infrastructure, technologies

10. Rules of application

A semantic profile is a tool for development and diagnosis, and not a mechanism for automatic ranking of a person.

Do not evaluate by one cell

Do not lose rights on the index

We need profile, context, dynamics and uncertainty.

Valuation should not be a ground for discrimination or automated punishment.

Separation of fact and interpretation

Revealing the Method

The user should see what is the data and what is the regulatory model.

For public decisions, sources, weights, formulas, assumptions, and measurement errors.

Entitlement to review

Do not maximize one indicator

The assessment should allow appeal and alternative evidence.

The goal is integrity and sustainable alignment of fields, not the victory of one value over all others.

11. Calculated contour

Narrative becomes part of the core only when it is related to the measurement and quality of the evidence.

Current value

Weight of importance

Dynamics

Risk of Distortion

Credibility

0–100

−1 / 0 / +1

The final assessment should take into account not only the level of the indicator, but also the weight, direction of the change, the risk of systemic bias and the quality of the evidence.

12. Control Cycle EQUILIBRIUM

The semantic layer is combined with observation, decision and verification of the result.

Value

Correction

Narrative

DYNAMIC

EQUALITY

Feedback

Metrics

Result

Evidence

Decision

13. The next level of development

From the core of 20 cells to the full methodology of 260 cells and a digital scanner.

Passports 20

Calibration

Scanner

Extension 13×20

Outline of decisions

5–10 metrics per cell; sources; thresholds; target ranges.

Expert panels, pilot data, weights and scales check.

Interface input, profiles, red zones, dynamics, evidence.

Full 260 passports and inter-cell connections.

Intervention scenarios, evaluation of side effects and control of the result.

The goal is to transform values from a declaration into a transparent, verifiable and adjustable development system.

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM NEUROSVOD

Source Status: Primary Document

The strategic concept describes a single intellectual architecture of meanings, knowledge, decisions and creative action.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/neirosvod-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Author's system: SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

2026

Passport document

ParameterContents
NameEQUILIBRIUM NEUROSVOD
TypeCivilizational Metasystem and Intelligent Operating Environment
PurposeBring disparate knowledge, interests, resources and actions into verifiable solutions
ScaleHuman → community → organization → territory → state → planet
Contour of executionEQUILIBRIUM — SFERA — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA
Basic principleA person sets goals and values; AI enhances understanding, prognosis, and coordination
StatusConceptual document; legal, technical and financial provisions require verification

Annotation

NEUROSVOD is not a separate neural network or another information system. It is an architecture of collective intelligence that connects human experience, scientific knowledge, cultural meanings, digital data, artificial intelligence models, institutions and execution mechanisms. It turns the flow of information into a holistic picture of reality and helps to act in a coordinated manner in conditions of complexity.

1. Reason and Design

The modern world has a huge amount of information, but lacks integrity. The data is fragmented, the departmental systems are incompatible, the expert positions are in conflict, and the decisions are often delayed. NEUROSVOD creates a super-system of coordination: it does not destroy diversity, but provides a common language, rules of trust and a joint picture of what is happening.

1.1. Mission

To create a safe human-centered environment of collective thinking and action, capable of timely recognizing threats and opportunities, uniting participants and directing resources to the preservation of life, human development, the sovereignty of society and the balance of the planet.

1.2. Strategic objectives

  • Collect distributed knowledge into a single testable semantic outline.
  • Provide early warning of natural, social, technological and economic risks.
  • Improve the quality of solutions through multi-model analysis, scenario forecasting and independent validation.
  • To organize the cooperation of the state, science, business, society and man around measurable results.
  • Preserve cultural memory and diversity of civilizations without losing data sovereignty and identity.

2. What is NEUROSVOD

2.1. Five images of the system

ImageMeaning
Nervous systemFeels changes, transmits signals, coordinates the reaction.
Mirror of RealityShows the state of the world along with uncertainty and sources.
CompassCorrelates options with values, goals, and consequences.
MemoryPreserves knowledge, decisions, experience and cultural heritage.
Operating environmentIt links analysis to responsible actors and resources.

2.2. What NEUROSVOD is not

  • It is not a “total control center.”
  • It does not replace human rights, scientific expertise and political responsibility.
  • Does not assign data to participants: access is built according to authority and sovereign rules.
  • It does not give a probability conclusion AI for an established fact.
  • It doesn’t end with a single vendor, model or technology platform.

3. Value Core

PrinciplePractical expression
Life and DignityPriority of safety, health, freedom of choice and human development.
Truth and EvidenceSeparation of facts, hypotheses, opinions and forecasts; the apparent origin of the conclusion.
SovereigntyOwner control over data, models, access rules and critical infrastructure.
FairnessChecking the distribution of benefits, risks, responsibilities and access to opportunities.
ResponsibilityEvery decision has an author, a reason, a deadline, a performer, and a measurable result.
DiversityHarmonization without unification of cultures, worldviews and local life forms.
CreationTechnology is valued for its contribution to the long-term public and natural good.

4. Architecture NEUROSVOD

Architecture is built as a set of interconnected layers. Each layer has its own rules of quality, safety, and responsibility; no algorithm gets the unconditional right to make irreversible decisions.

LayerFunctionMain result
1. SensoryObtaining data from registries, sensors, satellites, research and people.Observing streams
2. TrustSource identification, quality, access rights, signature and log of origin.Verified data
3. SemanticOntologies, classifiers, graph of knowledge, connections of objects and events.A single language
4. AnalyticalSearch for patterns, causal analysis, comparison, and explanation.Knowledge and conclusions
5. ProjectedScenarios, digital twins, stress tests and early warnings.Options for the future
6. ValueEvaluate goals, limitations, ethics, rights, and societal impact.Permissible solutions
7. DecisivePreparation of options, negotiation, record-keeping and selection.Mandate of action
8. Co-operativeSelection of participants, competencies, resources, contracts and financing.Contour of execution
9. EffectiveEffects monitoring, feedback, audit and training of the system.Measurable result

5. The Intelligent Core

5.1. Hypergraph of Reality

The basic data model is a hypergraph in which people, organizations, territories, assets, events, norms, goals, risks, projects, indicators and evidence are simultaneously represented. Communication can combine more than two entities and contain time, geography, level of trust, source and access mode.

5.2. Ensemble of models

  • Language models - analysis and synthesis of texts, dialogue, extraction of meanings.
  • Causal models - testing hypotheses and factors of influence.
  • Spatial-temporal models - territory, infrastructure, ecology, events and cycles.
  • Scenario and agent models are participants’ behavior and consequences of decisions.
  • Optimization models are the allocation of limited resources.
  • Expert rules - norms, standards, regulations and critical restrictions.

6. Ecosystem contours EQUILIBRIUM

ContourRole in NEUROSVOD
EQUILIBRIUMObservation, semantic assembly, modeling, prediction and equilibrium assessment.
SFERAA space of initiatives, communities, knowledge, cultures, and public participation.
ECO-PPAA mechanism for pooling public and private resources for threat prevention and development.
SPECZASHCHITACo-operative organization of execution: consortia, pilots, production, implementation.
GASMPGlobal aerospace monitoring, forecasting and early warning.
ESG-IR 1.0Evidence reporting, impact rating, validation and verification.
KRISTALL741Modular matrix of description and coordination of system elements.
IACA secure analytical circuit for managers and situation centers.

7. Functional modules

ModulePurpose
Navigator of meaningsIt identifies key ideas, contradictions, values and narratives.
Map of knowledgeLinks documents, experts, projects, technologies and evidence.
Pulse of RealityDisplays the current state of systems and deviations from the norm.
Radar threatsRanks risks by probability, scale, speed, and reversibility.
Laboratory of the FutureBuilds scripts, digital twins, and stress tests.
Solution DesignerForms options, selection criteria and solution packages.
Co-operative conveyorGathers teams, resources, contracts, schedules and responsibilities.
Register of resultsIt records indicators, evidence of effect and lessons learned.
Heritage archivePreserves cultural, scientific and civilizational knowledge.
Personal contourIt helps a person to learn, develop and participate in projects.

8. Decision-making cycle

  1. Record a signal, question, threat, or opportunity.
  2. Identify the object, scope, time and stakeholders.
  3. Collect data and assign them metadata of origin and quality.
  4. Create multiple explanations and identify gaps.
  5. Conduct independent verification and scenario modeling.
  6. Evaluate options by values, law, risk, resources, and long-term consequences.
  7. To make a decision by an authorized subject; to fix the grounds and dissenting opinions.
  8. Assemble the execution circuit, provide resources and control points.
  9. Measure the result, publish the admissible part of the evidence and update the knowledge.

9. Roles and management

RoleResponsibility
Council NEUROSVODMission, principles, strategic priorities, protection against system capture.
Scientific and Methodological CouncilMethods, model quality, reproducibility, expert disagreement.
Ethics and Rights CouncilHuman rights, admissibility, appeals and red lines.
Platform OperatorReliability, architecture, integration and operation.
Domain OwnersQuality of data and solutions in sectoral and territorial contours.
Validation bodiesIndependent verification of data, models, indicators and declared results.
Community domainParticipation, feedback, civic expertise and public impact control.
Data CommissionerSovereignty, access, privacy, retention periods and rights of subjects.

9.1. Human rights in the system

  • Right to know when a conclusion or recommendation is formed AI.
  • The right to obtain a clear explanation of the basis of a significant decision.
  • The right to correct data, to object and to request a review by a person.
  • Right to data minimization and restriction of secondary use.
  • The right to a protected space of privacy and cultural identity.

10. Data, trust and security

10.1. Data classes

ClassExampleMode
OpenPublications, open statistics, public maps.Open license and attribution
ServiceOperational data of organizations and projects.Role-based access
ConfidentialCommercial secrets, personal and medical data.Minimization, encryption, strict audit
CriticalSecurity, infrastructure, protected state contours.Isolated treatment and special tolerance
Culturally SensitiveKnowledge of communities, indigenous peoples, sacred heritage.Consent of custodians and special protocols

10.2. The “zero trust” model

  • Each subject, device, request, and access context is checked.
  • The rights are granted as minimally necessary and are limited to a period.
  • Critical action requires separation of powers and multilateral confirmation.
  • All changes, models, and data sets are versioned.
  • Attacks, errors, leaks and insider abuse are constantly being modeled.

11. Sovereign and Federal Model

NEUROSVOD is developing as a federation of compatible nodes. The data may remain with the owner or in the national contour, and allowed signs, evidence or results of calculations are transmitted to the outside. Compatibility is ensured by open protocols, semantic standards, trusted registries and mutual recognition of validation procedures.

LevelExample of nodeWhat Remains Sovereign
PersonalPersonal assistant and consent store.Identity, goals, history and private data
OrganizationalCompany, university, cooperative.Commercial data, models and processes
TerritorialCity, region, natural area.Operational data and local priorities
NationalPublic knowledge infrastructure.Law, security and critical registries
InternationalEarly warning and scientific cooperation network.Terms of participation and exchange boundaries

12. Priority application scenarios

Area of workFirst practical result
Ecology and climateBiocenose monitoring points, ecosystem status map, early warning.
Health careForecast of load, prevention, routing without doctor's substitution.
Science and industryMap of technologies, chains of cooperation, acceleration from research to production.
City and TerritoryDigital twin infrastructure, events and quality of life.
Social sphereTargeted support, assessment of the availability and real effect of programs.
Culture and heritageArchive of civilizational memory, registers, rights and digital restoration.
SecurityA set of interdisciplinary signals without the automation of repressive decisions.
EducationPersonal trajectories and a map of competencies related to development tasks.
Finance for developmentTraceability of capital to social, environmental and economic outcomes.

13. Maturity and performance indicators

GroupExamples of indicators
DataCompleteness, relevance, share with proven proven provenance, number of compatible sources.
KnowledgeThe share of concepts in ontologies, the coherence of the graph, the speed of detection of contradictions.
ForecastAccuracy, horizon, calibration of uncertainty, the proportion of timely warnings.
DecisionsCycle time, explainability, number of alternatives, proportion of solutions with independent verification.
ImplementationTerm, budget, cooperation, achievement of control points.
ImpactChange in the state of people, nature, economy and institutions relative to the baseline.
TrustNumber of appeals, corrections, incidents, level of participation and clarity for users.
ResilienceFailover, technological independence, portability and cost of ownership.

14. Road map 2026–2030

StageTimeframeContentsResult
I. Foundation0–6 monthsCharter of Principles, ontology of the core, management model, registry of requirements and pilots.Architectural standard 1.0
II. Prototype6–12 monthsKnowledge graph, trusted data catalog, ensemble of models, job analyst.MVP NEUROSVOD
III. Pilots12–24 monthsEcology, territory, industrial cooperation, social programs.4 Proof Pilot
IV. Federation24–36 monthsConnecting regions and organizations, certification of nodes, validation center.A network of compatible nodes
V. Zoom36–60 monthsNational and international contours, GASMP, industry digital twins.The Collective Mind Infrastructure

14.1. First 100 days

  1. Establish a project office and an architecture council.
  2. Approve the mission, red lines and model of participants’ rights.
  3. Describe 20 base domains and the kernel ontology.
  4. Choose two pilots: biocenosis monitoring and industrial cooperation.
  5. Create a catalog of data sources and requirements for origin.
  6. Deploy a protected knowledge graph prototype.
  7. Determine the methodology for assessing the prognosis and social impact.
  8. Prepare a package of partnerships, budget and legal sandbox.

15. Resource model

ContourMinimum composition
ManagementProgram manager, chief architect, domain owners, PMO.
ScienceSystem Analysis, AI, Causal Methods, Sociology, Ecology, Economics, Law.
TechnologyData platform, knowledge graph, MLOps, cybersecurity, interfaces, integrations.
ValidationIndependent experts, testing laboratories, model and results audits.
ImplementationSPECZASHCHITA, industry partners, regions, development institutions and project consortia.
FinancingGrants, government programs, partner contributions, project and impact funding.

16. Key risks and protection measures

RiskProtection measure
Monopolization of TruthPluralism of models, open bases of conclusion, right to dissent.
Total controlData minimization, federal architecture, prohibition of hidden profiling.
Errors AICalibration of uncertainty, independent verification, human decision.
Seizing InterestsSeparation of powers, transparency of conflicts of interest, public oversight.
Leakage or attackZero Trust, Segmentation, Encryption, Backup, Exercise and Response.
DiscriminationAudit of data and models, fairness tests, accessible appeal.
Imitation of resultBaseline, verifiable indicators, independent impact assessment.
Technological dependenceOpen standards, portability, domestic and alternative stacks.

17. Legal and ethical red lines

  • Prohibition of the autonomous making of irreversible decisions about the life, freedom, rights and dignity of a person.
  • Prohibition of hidden mass ratings of loyalty and social ratings that restrict rights.
  • Prohibition of the use of personal data outside the stated purpose without legal basis and informed consent.
  • Prohibition of masking the probabilistic conclusion under the fact or expert opinion.
  • Mandatory log of origin of data, models and significant changes.
  • The obligation to independently investigate incidents and notify affected entities.

18. Target status image

In the target state, NEUROSVOD becomes a trusted environment where a person can see the relationship between personal choice and general processes; a researcher to test the hypothesis on related data; a supervisor to get not one “magic answer”, but explainable options with consequences; a society to control goals and results; international partners to exchange warnings without surrendering sovereignty.

Conclusion

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM It is offered as an open-minded and sovereign infrastructure of collective intelligence. Its value is determined not by the power of algorithms, but by the quality of the connection between truth, moral choice, responsibility and result. The first step is to create a limited, testable prototype on a real-world task, capture the evidence of benefit and only then expand the scale.

Annex A. Minimum node standard NEUROSVOD

RequirementReadiness criteria
IdentityParticipants and services have verifiable identification.
OriginEach dataset contains the source, date, owner, license, and quality.
SemanticsCompatible ontology and persistent identifiers are used.
SecurityRole-based access, encryption, logging, backup and response.
ModelsVersions, tests, restrictions, metrics, responsible person and conditions of use are known.
ExplanatorySignificant conclusions are accompanied by grounds and level of uncertainty.
AppealThe channel of the objection, the time frame and the person accepting the review are determined.
CompatibilityApproved exchange protocols and data portability are supported.
ResultThere is a baseline, indicators, evidence and independent verification.

Annex B. Terms

TermWorking definition
Knowledge GraphA related representation of entities, events, properties, and evidence.
HypergraphA graph in which a single link can combine multiple objects and contexts.
OntologyFormal description of concepts, relations and rules of the subject area.
Digital twinAn updated model of an object or system for analysis and scenarios.
ValidationConfirmation of the suitability of the method, model or solution for the stated purpose.
VerificationConfirmation of compliance with established requirements and actual data.
FederalityInteraction of autonomous nodes without mandatory centralization of data.
The human mandateClear responsibility of the authorized person for a significant decision.

Other published edition: NEUROSVOD Neural_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

Unified intellectual architecture of meanings, knowledge, decisions and actions

DATA

MEANINGS

COLLECTIVE

ROOM

FORECAST

ACTION

Strategic Concept • Version 1.0

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 23 August 2026

The world does not lack data — it lacks wholeness

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

Disjointed systems see individual fragments of reality. Decisions are delayed because knowledge, responsibility, and resources are not connected.

Information

Expertise

Decisions

Resources

Result

NEUROSVOD

creates a common language, trust and a cycle of joint action

NEUROSVOD is a distributed system

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

It forms a coherent graph of knowledge and action based on trusted data, human values, scientific methods, and artificial intelligence.

Nervous system

Mirror of Reality

Compass

feels the changes and coordinates the reaction

shows the state of the world and uncertainty

Compare options with values and consequences

Memory

Operating environment

preserves knowledge, decisions and heritage

Connects analysis with performers and resources

The mission is to understand reality and act together

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

A safe human-centered environment of collective thinking helps to recognize threats and opportunities in a timely manner, unite participants and direct resources to a creative result.

INTEGRITY

WARNING

QUALITY OF DECISIONS

COOPERATION

HERITAGE

A single testable outline of knowledge

Early detection of threats and opportunities

Scenarios, validation and explicability

State, science, business and society

Preservation of cultural memory and sovereignty

The value core limits the technological power

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

Life and Dignity

Responsibility

Safety, health and freedom of choice

Author, reason, deadline and measurable result

Truth

Diversity

Separation of facts, hypotheses and opinions

Harmonization without unification of cultures

Sovereignty

Creation

Control over data, models and access

Long-term public and natural good

Fairness

Balancing benefits, risks and opportunities

Nine layers turn a signal into a measurable result

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

CENTURY

TRUST

SEMANTIC

ANALYTIC

FORECAST

Observations

Verified data

Single Language

knowledge

scenarios

VALUABLE

DECISIVE

COOPERATIVE

RESULTS

Permissibility

mandate

execution

effect

The knowledge graph works together with the ensemble of models

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

ANSAMBL MODELS

HYPERGRAPH OF REALITY

Language and Semantic

Territories

Cause-effect

People

Spatial-temporal

Objectives

Scenarios and Agents

Risks

Events

Optimisation

Expert rules

Entities, Connections, Time, Geography, Trust and Evidence

Critical decision cannot depend on one answer AI

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

DATA

MODELS

EXPERTS

HUMANITY

Origin and quality

Several independent methods

Verification and dissenting opinions

clear mandate and responsibility

Probabilistic inference becomes a decision only after verification, evaluation of consequences and acceptance of responsibility.

The ecosystem links understanding with execution

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

SPECZASHCHITA

EQUILIBRIUM

observation • forecast

Initiatives and Participation

cooperation and execution

ECO-PPA

GASMP

resources for development

Planetary Warning

ESG-IR 1.0 • KRISTALL741 • IAC

Probability • Modularity • Protected Analytics

Ten modules form the working environment NEUROSVOD

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

Navigator of meanings

Map of knowledge

Pulse of Reality

Radar threats

Laboratory of the Future

Solution Designer

Co-operative conveyor

Register of results

Heritage archive

Personal contour

From understanding the meaning to the proven result and personal development

Each solution goes through a closed feedback cycle

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

SIGNAL

CONTACTS

DATA

HYPOTHESIS

VERIFICATION

IMPLICATIONS

DECISION

EXECUTION

RESULT

The result becomes a new observation - the system learns from consequences, not declarations.

Management shares strategy, method and control

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

Council NEUROSVOD

Scientific and Methodological Council

mission • priorities • capture protection

methods • Reproducibility • Quality of models

Ethics and Rights Council

Platform Operator

human rights • red lines • appeals

architecture • integration • reliability

Domain Owners

Validation bodies

Quality of data and solutions

independent verification

Community domain

Data Commissioner

Participation and public control

Sovereignty • Privacy • Access

Human rights embedded in architecture

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

Know when recommendation created AI

Get a clear explanation of the reason

Correct the data and object

Demand revision of a significant decision by a person

Restrict secondary use of data

Preserving privacy and cultural identity

Data Sovereignty: Federality and Zero Trust

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

The data may remain with the owner or in the national loop. Only permitted signs, evidence or results of calculations are transmitted to the outside.

PERSONAL

ORGANIZATIONAL

TERRITORIAL

NATIONAL

INTERNATIONAL

Identity and Consent

Commercial Data and Models

Local priorities

Law and Critical Registers

Exchange conditions and early warning

Minimum powers

Encryption and Logging

Data and Models Version

Multilateral confirmation of critical action

Pilots need to prove their worth on real tasks

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

Ecology

Science and industry

Biocenosis points and early warning

technology map and production cooperation

City and Territory

Social sphere

Digital twin infrastructure and quality of life

targeted support and evaluation of the result

Culture

Finance for development

Heritage archive, rights and digital restoration

Traceability of capital before impact

Five Stages: From Standard to Infrastructure

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

0–6 months

6–12 months

III

12–24 months

24–36 months

36–60 months

BASIC

PROTOTIP

PILOTS

FEDERATION

MASSHTAB

architectural standard 1.0

MVP NEUROSVOD

4 Proof Pilot

a Network of Compatible Hosts

national and international infrastructure

Project Office • red lines • Ontology of the core • 2 Pilot • Data Catalog • Knowledge Graph Prototype

100 DAYS

Red lines protect from total control

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

UNFULLED

REQUIRED

Autonomous irreversible decisions about life, freedom and rights

Human Mandate and Right of Appeal

Hidden social rating and mass loyalty assessment

Federated architecture and data minimization

Use of personal data outside the stated purpose

Verifiable origin of data and models

Masking the probability output under the established fact

Independent investigation of incidents

Connect not databases, but responsibility

NEUROSVOD EQUILIBRIUM

Not only intelligence, but wisdom.

Not only the forecast, but the ability to act in a timely and collaborative manner.

Create a limited, testable prototype on a real-world task — and scale only after independent proof of use.

First step

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS • 2026

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM Neural_Culture_and_Civilization_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · Web Text +

NEUROSVOD CULTURES AND CIVILIZATIONS

Architecture of meanings, cultural memory, civilization codes, 64 states, protocols, registers and solutions

CULTURE

CIVILIZATION

64 CODE

NEUROSVOD

Conceptual presentation · version 1.0

1. What is NEUROSVOD Cultures and Civilizations

Not an archive of culture and not a single ideology, but a living system of connections, memory, diagnostics and co-evolution.

Culture

Civilization

NEUROSVOD

The field of meanings, language, symbols, memory, images and norms through which civilization is aware of itself and transmits internal code between generations.

A complex system of people, institutions, territories, technologies, economy and historical memory, united by a stable picture of the world and a development trajectory.

The intellectual layer that links cultural codes and civilization processes captures states, identifies imbalances, and shows possible transitions.

Meaning → state → solution → memory

2. Culture is the core of civilization

External systems change faster than deep cultural code; this is why culture becomes a pillar of long-term development.

Memory

Creativity

Archiving experiences, texts, symbols and heritage.

Creates new meanings and forms of the future.

CULTURE

Identity

Dialogue

MEANING

Defines "who we are" without destroying differences.

Allows civilizations to interact without dissolving.

Inheritance

Coevolution

CIVILIZATION

Passes the code of civilization through generations.

Connects culture, technology, nature and man.

3. Eight Layers NEUROSVOD

64 States are formed as 8 Meaningful Layers × 8 Stages of the life cycle.

Meaning

What does the layer

Each layer stores its own statuses, indicators, data sources, risks, protocols of actions and connections with other layers. Together, they form a multidimensional portrait of civilization, where economic efficiency cannot be considered separately from culture, ethics, nature, and the future.

Ethics

Mind

Culture

Technology

Economy

Nature

8 × 8 = 64

Future

4. Eight Stages of the Life Cycle

Each layer goes through the same rhythm - from the origin to the equilibrium and a new cycle.

Birth

Growth

Activity

Peak

Tension

Crisis

Transformation

Balance

Key control points: 5 - voltage requires early intervention; 6 - crisis requires stabilization; 7 - transformation opens the choice of a new trajectory; 8 - equilibrium does not mean stopping, and the system is ready for the next cycle.

5. Matrix 64 codons

Each cell is a specific layer state: diagnosable, observable, and associated with possible transitions.

Birth.

Growth

An asset.

Peak

E.g.

Crisis

Transf.

Balance

Meaning

tension

Ethics

Mind

Culture

Crisis

Technology

Economy

Exit

Nature

Future

6. Cultural range: codons 25–32

An example of how one cultural system goes through a full cycle - from birth to harmony.

25 · Birth of culture

29 · Conflict of cultures

There is a new image of the world, language or art form.

Meanings collide; polarization and the struggle of interpretations increase.

26 · Expansion of traditions

30 · Cultural Decline

The new form receives carriers and sustainable practices.

Inheritance is broken, symbols lose their meaning, forms become empty.

27 · Active development

31 · Revival of culture

Culture produces schools, works, institutions and rituals.

There is a reassembly of the heritage and the creation of new forms based on it.

28 · Cultural flourishing

32 · Cultural harmony

High density of creativity, authority and influence.

Identity is sustainable, open to dialogue and capable of creating the future.

7. The Seven Axes of Reconciliation

The codon shows the state; the axes answer the question of whether the solution is consistent with the integrity of the system.

Meaning

For what?

Future

Ethics

What will be left after us?

Is it acceptable?

DECISION

Nature

Mind

What happens to living systems?

Is it proven?

Technology

Culture

How amplifying?

What do we keep?

8. Protocols NEUROSVOD

The protocol turns surveillance into a controlled sequence of actions.

Define the object, layer, stage, and current codon.

Diagnostics

Show natural, degradation and evolutionary trajectory.

Analysis of transitions

Identify the target codon and the necessary actions.

Trajectory Selection

Evaluate the decision on the seven axes of agreement.

Axle check

Track indicators, speed of transition and deviation.

Monitoring

Interfere with tension and crisis to irreversible damage.

Correction

Secure a steady state and start a new learning cycle.

Transition to Balance

9. Registers — system memory

Registers make NEUROSVOD verifiable: every state, decision, and consequence gets a story.

Register of States

Register of Ethics

Active codons by objects, territories and layers.

Conflicts of principles, limitations and results of ethical review.

the Register of Transitions

the Register of Streams

The history of the movement between states and the causes of transitions.

Resources, investments, cultural and information flows.

Register of Decisions

Scenario Register

What was decided by whom, on the basis of what data and with what result.

Models of the future, probabilities, prerequisites and control indicators.

The Imbalance Register

Principle

Tensions, crises, systemic risks, and early signals.

A protocol without a registry creates an action without memory; a registry without a protocol creates an archive without management.

10. Solution engine

NEUROSVOD does not replace man: it forms an evidential picture and makes the consequences of choice visible.

DATA

CODON

OSI

SCENARIA

DECISION

REGISTER

Sources and observation

System status

Verification of approval

Transition Options

responsible subject

Results and training

The main principle: the system helps to see, compare and predict, but the goal setting, values and ultimate responsibility remain with the person and institutions that have authority.

11. Interface: the state of civilization on one screen

The prototype combines global status, seven axes, active codons, risks and decision scenarios.

EQUILIBRIUM / CIVILIZATION VIEW

ACTIVE CODES

Meaning

Culture

tension

Ethics

Mind

Technology

Peak

Culture

Nature

Violation

Technology

INDEX OF EQUALITY

Nature

Future

Design

Future

OPEN THE SCENARIUM

12. Map of Civilizations

The map is built not only by territories, but by cultural codes, flows, connections and states.

Knowledge

Technology

The Cultural Core

Institutions

Economy

Community

Hypergraph

Heritage

One node can simultaneously belong to culture, economy, knowledge and the future.

Nature

13. The contour of trust and ethical management

The more powerful the analytics, the stricter the application limits, transparency, and responsibility sharing should be.

Person

Expert community

Institutions

AI / NEUROSVOD

Meaning, values, the right to make a final choice.

Methodology, data validation, interpretation and disagreement.

Powers, procedures, public liability and enforcement.

Analysis, link detection, modeling and scenario explanation.

Invariable core: protection of human dignity · prohibition of hidden total impact · explicability of significant decisions · verifiability of data · right to revision · preservation of cultural diversity.

14. Prototype road map

From the concept to the demonstration system, then to the pilot registers and the evidence model.

Ontology

Registries

MVP interface

Pilot of culture

Validation

Scaling

Approve 64 codon, define layers, stages, indicators and links.

Create minimum registers of states, solutions, transitions and sources.

Dashboard + matrix 8×8 + Codon Card + scenarios.

Select one cultural system or territory and collect the observed indicators.

Compare expert assessments, data, and actual consequences of decisions.

Connect new civilizational contours, institutions and industry modules.

The first criterion for success: NEUROSVOD should give a clearer, verifiable and multidimensional picture of the cultural process than a set of disparate reports and expert opinions.

NEUROSVOD CULTURES AND CIVILIZATIONS

Not the unification of civilizations, but the ability to see differences, to store memories, to identify imbalances, and to create a space for a coherent future.

Culture makes sense.

Civilization gives form.

NEUROSVOD creates connectivity.

Balance sets the direction.

EQUILIBRIUM

NEUROSVOD Civilizations

Published files

Platform · Full published text

The EQUILIBRIUM Operating System: Bringing It All Together

Source Status: Primary Document

The materials describe a general architecture for managing meaning, data, resources, projects and results, from observation and analytics to execution and feedback.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/operatsionnaya-sistema-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

0. Summary of document

EQUILIBRIUM OS is a concept of a digital operating system for the coherent management of a complex ecosystem: people, organizations, knowledge, resources, initiatives, risks and measurable results. The system does not replace the state, law, banking infrastructure or professional institutions; it creates a single layer of observation, coordination, evidence and feedback over them.

The document is based on three groups of materials: the strategic logic of the transition from the current state to the target state; the previously formed scheme of cooperative accounting and funds; visual matrix and cyclic models, which in EQUILIBRIUM are used as a modeling language, and not as scientifically proven physical laws.

Certain metaphysical and esoteric interpretations of the original illustrations are not accepted as fact in this version. Their geometry and cyclicity are used only as heuristic models for interfaces, state classification, and scenario thinking.

0.1. The result that the OS should give

  • a single register of objects, participants, projects, resources and results;
  • transparent life cycle of the initiative from design to verified effect;
  • a single contour of goal-setting, prioritization and portfolio management;
  • accounting for financial and non-financial deposits without mixing with bank accounting;
  • outline of monitoring, risks, evidence and validation;
  • digital twin of the ecosystem and the graph of relationships;
  • ability to scale from a pilot group to an interagency/interorganizational platform.

Contents

1. Purpose and boundaries EQUILIBRIUM OS

2. Basic principles

3. Three-level model: meaning - management - action

4. Semi-rig cycle EQUILIBRIUM

5. OS Module Architecture

6. Registers and a single data model

7. Outline of projects and portfolios

8. Resource and financial contour

9. Value and Result

10. Governance, roles and responsibilities

11. State Matrix and Scenario Engine

12. Hypergraph and Digital Double

13. Monitoring, risks and early warning

14. Evidence, validation and audit

15. IT-architecture

16. Security, law and ethics

17. User Interface

18. Pilot Outline

19. Roadmap for scaling

20. KPI and maturity criteria

21. Canonical scheme EQUILIBRIUM

Annex A. Dictionary

Annex B. Minimum data model

1. Purpose and boundaries EQUILIBRIUM OS

EQUILIBRIUM OS is designed to manage not a separate organization, but a related system of systems. It is an ecosystem where goals, people, institutions, projects, assets, data, risks, regulatory constraints and outcomes exist simultaneously.

1.1. What OS does

FunctionContents
ObservationCollects and links data on objects, events, projects and indicators.
UnderstandingIt forms a picture of the current state, deviations, causes and connections.
Goal-settingIt fixes the target state, success criteria and limitations.
OrchestrationAssigns roles, resources, dependencies, milestones, and milestones.
ImplementationTransfers tasks to application circuits and tracks status.
VerificationVerifies the evidence of the result, the origin of the data and compliance with the criteria.
TrainingSaves decision history and updates models based on feedback.

1.2. What OS doesn't do

  • does not issue money and is not a payment system without a separate legal basis;
  • does not replace accounting, tax, banking or public accounting;
  • does not replace judicial, supervisory and regulatory procedures;
  • does not assign to metaphysical models the status of scientifically confirmed laws;
  • does not make critical decisions autonomously without a prescribed level of human control.

2. Basic principles

PrinciplePractical meaning
IntegrityThe solution is evaluated not only locally, but also by the impact on the system as a whole.
VerifiabilityEach significant fact has a source, date, owner and level of trust.
CyclicityThe control is organized as a repeatable loop with feedback.
ModularityThe LO functions can be implemented in stages and independently.
SubsidiarityThe decision is made at the lowest level, which has sufficient competence.
Transparency of rolesEvery object and action has a responsible, consistent, and observer.
InteroperabilityThe system integrates with external IP via API and open formats.
Security by defaultAccess, identification, logging and data minimization are embedded in the kernel.
MeasurabilityA goal without indicators is not considered an operational goal.
The Man in the OutlineHigh-risk decisions require confirmation by an authorized person.

3. Three-level model: meaning - management - action

EQUILIBRIUM divides the system into three interrelated levels. This allows you not to mix value bases, management decisions and operational transactions.

LevelKey issueObjectsWithdrawal
I. SmyslovaWhy?mission, values, future image, strategic goals, limitationsTarget states and criteria
II. ManagementWhat?portfolios, rules, roles, scenarios, risks, resourcesdecisions, priorities, plans
III. OperationWhat's done?projects, tasks, contracts, operations, assets, eventsMeasurable Results and Evidence

4. Semi-rig cycle EQUILIBRIUM

CodeStepMeaning
BeforeSign inneed, problem, opportunity, initiative
PEContributionpeople, competences, money, assets, data, rights
MIAccountingidentification, registry, classification, origin
FADesignpurpose, scenario, budget, roles, risks, KPI
SALTSImplementationexecution, delivery, events, control points
LYADistributioneffect, benefits, compensation, re-investment
SIFeedbackassessment, audit, lessons, model change

Musical designations are used as a memorable visual code of the interface. They do not replace formal business process identifiers.

5. OS Module Architecture

ModulePurpose
M01 Identityparticipants, organizations, authorities, digital roles
M02 Registersa single catalog of objects, projects, assets, documents and events
M03 Goalstree goals, indicators, strategic maps
M04 Projectslife cycle initiatives, portfolios, dependencies, stages
M05 Resourcesfinancial and non-financial contributions, capacities, competencies
M06 Fundsallocation of resources, limits, distribution rules
M07 Resultsproducts, services, social, environmental and economic impact
M08 Evidencedocuments, measurements, photos, telemetry, signatures, origin control
M09 Risksthreats, probabilities, consequences, response measures
M10 Monitoringdashboards, signals, thresholds, early warning
M11 CountHypergraph connections and digital twin
M12 ScriptsTransition models, alternatives, decision rules
M13 Knowledgeontology, dictionary, methods, regulatory grounds
M14 IntegrationsAPI, external state and corporate IP
M15 Auditlog of actions, versions, approvals, checks

6. Registers and a single data model

The register is the central principle of the OS. Each object receives a stable identifier and is described through a single set of attributes: type, owner, status, links, timestamps, data sources, access rights, and proofs.

RegisterKey Entities
Participantsindividuals, organizations, units, experts, operators
Objectsterritories, infrastructure, equipment, natural objects, digital assets
Projectsinitiatives, programs, portfolios, control points
Resourcesmoney, materials, power, labor, competence, data, rights
Resultsproduct, service, effect, indicator, verified achievement
Risksthreat, vulnerability, scenario, event, damage, measure
Documentsbasis, contract, protocol, report, act, proof

7. Outline of projects and portfolios

The project in EQUILIBRIUM is a managed transition from the fixed initial state to the target one, having the owner, resources, timing, indicators and evidence of the result.

7.1. Passport of project

  • problem/possibility and initial state;
  • target state and KPI;
  • customer, owner of the result, operator and partners;
  • resources and sources;
  • road map and control points;
  • risks and prerequisites;
  • plan of evidence;
  • model of effect and distribution of result.

7.2. Portfolio Logic

The OS should allow you to see not only the status of individual projects, but also resource conflicts, duplication, overall dependencies, the contribution of each project to strategic goals and the total risk of the portfolio.

8. Resource and financial contour

The original manual scheme with cooperative share fund, personal accounts, registry, conversion, trust funds and income distribution is translated into a formal digital circuit. While accounting and banking operations remain in external licensed systems, EQUILIBRIUM stores their management reflection and project links.

ContourPurposeNote
Share/participatoryProperty and other participationonly within the framework of the applicable law and the charter of a particular organization
Earmarked contributionresources for a specific program/projecthas limitations of use
StandbySustainability and Risk Coveragerules of replenishment / use are fixed in advance
Developmentsscaling, R&D, infrastructureportfolio approach
Socialcompensation and socially significant tasksSpecific admissibility criteria
Investmentcapital projects and returnable instrumentsRequires legal qualifications and financial compliance

9. Value and Result

EQUILIBRIUM should take into account not only the monetary result. For complex programs, the value is broken down into at least five dimensions.

MeasurementExamples
Economicrevenue, savings, productivity, value of assets
Socialavailability of services, employment, quality of the environment, trust
Ecologicalreduction of impact, recovery, resource efficiency
The technologicaltechnology readiness, localization, reliability, scalability
Institutionalreduction of transaction costs, speed of approvals, data quality

10. Governance, roles and responsibilities

RoleResponsibility
Council of the Systemmission, principles, major architecture changes and access policies
Strategic operatorobjectives and programmes portfolio, priorities, inter-contour coordination
Owner of directionAchievement of results in their subject area
Project operatorproject execution, terms, budget, evidence
Validator/auditorindependent verification of data, methods and results
Data Administratorquality, origin, rights, classification
Platform Administratoravailability, security, integration, versions
Participantcontribution, execution, compliance, feedback

10.1. The Four Eyes Principle

Critical operations - changing criteria, large allocation of resources, recognition of the result, changing access rights - require independent confirmation by a second authorized person.

11. State Matrix and Scenario Engine

The 64 position matrices and hexagrams shown in the source materials can be reinterpreted as a state classification interface. In a software implementation, each cell must have a formal, verifiable content, not a mystical interpretation.

ElementFormal implementation
64 Statusa set of discrete state classes of a system or object
lines/trigramsBinary or categorical signs
transitiona condition, event or decision that changes state
ColorLevel of risk/readiness/priority
CycleRepeated process of observation and adjustment

It is recommended for the pilot not to start with 64 states. It is more practical to use 8–12 main states and expand the classifier after data accumulation.

12. Hypergraph and Digital Double

A hypergraph is a natural representation of EQUILIBRIUM: one project is simultaneously associated with territories, organizations, resources, goals, risks, indicators, and documents. The usual table model does not reflect such multidimensional relationships well.

Node TypeExamples of relationships
Goalachieved by projects; measured KPI; limited to policy makers
Projectis executed by organizations; consumes resources; creates results
Resourcebelongs to the owner; allocated to the project; has a cost / limitation
Riskthreatens the object; affects KPI; reduces priority or requires action
EvidenceConfirms an event, operation, performance or result
Territorycontains objects; has indicators; is associated with threats and programs

13. Monitoring, risks and early warning

The monitoring circuit transfers the OS from reporting mode to control mode. The system must distinguish between fact, deviation, trend, threat, and forecast.

LevelMeaningResponse
Greenindicator in the allowable rangesurveillance
YellowEarly DeviationVerification of cause and preventive measure
OrangeSignificant threat to the goalCorrective plan and responsible
Redcritical event/breakdownEscalation and Crisis Protocol
BlueUncertainty/lack of datacollection of evidence, prohibition on confident conclusion

14. Evidence, validation and audit

EQUILIBRIUM should store not only the value of the indicator, but also the chain of origin. This is especially important for environmental, social, financial and technological statements.

14.1. Minimum chain of evidence

  1. source of data;
  2. method of obtaining;
  3. time and place of measurement;
  4. device/document/operator identifier;
  5. version of the method;
  6. an immutable record of subsequent changes;
  7. Validator decision and level of trust.

15. IT-architecture

The target architecture is built as a modular platform system with a API-first approach. In the first version, a monolith with clear domain modules is preferred; microservice architecture is justified after the appearance of real loads and team specialization.

LayerComponents
Clientweb, mobile/PWA, expert office, command center
APIREST/GraphQL gateway, authentication, rate limits, integration
Applianceregisters, projects, goals, funds, monitoring, scenarios
Datarelational database, graph database, object storage, event log
AnalysisBI, time series, rules, predictive models
IntegrationsESB/event bus, external IC connectors
SecurityIAM, MFA, RBAC/ABAC, secrets, encryption, SIEM

15.1. Recommended minimum pilot stack

  • PostgreSQL - the main transaction base;
  • Neo4j / compatible graph database - if necessary, a complex graph;
  • S3-compatible storage - documents and evidence;
  • Keycloak/analogue - identity and role management;
  • Python/FastAPI or TypeScript/NestJS - API;
  • React/Next.js — web interface;
  • Metabase/Grafana - dashboards and monitoring.

16. Security, law and ethics

Because the OS potentially integrates sensitive data, financial flows, infrastructure, and management decisions, security must be designed to scale.

MonitoringRequirement
Accessminimum necessary rights; MFA; periodic audit
Dataclassification, minimization, encryption, storage time
AuditInvariable log of significant actions
Separation of responsibilitiesInitiator ≠ The only one who claims ≠ The only auditor
AIexplainability of recommendations, model logging, prohibition of autonomous critical decisions
Righteach financial/personal/regulated scenario undergoes a separate legal qualification

17. User Interface

The visual concept of EQUILIBRIUM can retain circular geometry, but the interface must remain businesslike and readable. Symbols are used as navigation, not as data replacement.

ScreenWhat the user sees
Main Circle7 cycle steps; current state; critical signals
System mapgraph of goals, projects, resources, facilities and risks
Portfoliopriorities, budgets, progress, dependencies
Projectpassport, team, tasks, KPI, proof
Registersearch, filters, entity cards, history
Command Centersignals, deviations, forecasts, solutions
AuditWho, when, and on what basis did the record or decision change?

18. Pilot Outline

The pilot should not check the philosophy of the system, but the passage of a complete management cycle. The minimum verification unit is one real project, one set of participants and one measurable result.

ParameterPilot
Participants20–50 people / 3–8 organizations
Projects1–3 Project
Registriesparticipants, projects, resources, documents, results
Integrationsminimum; upload files and import tables
Financemanagement accounting without own payment functions
Monitoring10–20 KPI + 5–10 Risk
Timeframe8–12 weeks
The criterion of successfull cycle from application to confirmed result and audited decision history

19. Roadmap for scaling

StageHorizonResult
Stage 0. Architecture0–4 weeksontology, dictionary, role model, 1 process, data model
Stage 1. MVP1–3 monthsregisters, projects, goals, files, roles, logs, basic dashboards
Stage 2. Pilot3–6 monthsreal users, integrations, monitoring, evidence
Stage 3. Platform6–12 monthsgraph, scripts, portfolios, external API, mobile access
Stage 4. Federation12–24 monthsseveral organizations/regions, common standards and validation
Stage 5. Supersystem24+ monthsintersystem analytics, digital twins, forecasting, international contours

20. KPI and maturity criteria

CriterionMVPPilotScale
Share of objects with unique ID80%95%99%+
Share of projects with KPI and owner90%98%99%+
Percentage of results with evidence70%90%95%+
Time to find the basis of the decision< 10 min< 3 min< 1 min
Percentage of transactions with full audit trail90%98%99.9%
Response time to critical deviationdaysWatchesminutes/hours
Data reuseLowMiddlehigh, intercontour

21. Canonical scheme EQUILIBRIUM

In canonical form, the OS is a concentric system of five contours.

ContourContents
Center — Person/PurposeSubject, Value, Intent, Responsibility
Ring 1 — CycleDORI-FA-SOLIA
Ring 2 — Controlrules, roles, scenarios, states, risks
Ring 3 — Economics and projectsresources, funds, projects, results
Ring 4 - Registers and Countsdata, links, evidence, history
External field — Wednesdaysociety, state, market, nature, international systems

Annex A. Dictionary

TermDefinition
Objectany entity that is assigned an ID and that participates in OS processes
Statea fixed set of characteristics of an object at a certain moment
Eventchange relevant to the condition, risk, project or indicator
Goaldescription of the required state with measurable criteria
ProjectManaged transition from initial to target state
Resultconfirmed change, product, service or effect
Evidencedata or document confirming the fact or result
Hypergrapha model that allows one connection to combine more than two entities
Digital twinActualized digital model of the object/system and its state
State MatrixFormalized classifier of possible system modes
Validatora role that confirms the correctness of the data, methodology or result
Audit Traila continuous history of significant actions and changes

Annex B. Minimum data model

EntityMinimum fields
Participantid, type, name, roles, status, owner, access_policy
Goalid, title, parent_id, owner, baseline, target, deadline, kpi_ids
Projectid, goal_ids, owner, operator, status, budget, milestones, risk_ids
Resourceid, type, owner, quantity/value, restrictions, project_id
Eventid, type, object_id, timestamp, source, payload, trust_level
KPIid, method, unit, baseline, target, actual, source_id, verified
Evidenceid, object_id, type, hash, source, timestamp, verifier, version
Riskid, object_id, probability, impact, status, mitigation, owner
Decisionid, issue, options, selected, rationale, approvers, evidence_ids
Relationshipfrom_id, relation_type, to_id, validity_period, source

Notes on sources and interpretations

1. The strategic logic of the document is consistent with the approach in which the development project is built through a description of the initial state, target state, transition factors and a distinction between system/metasystem design levels. In the user's submission, O.S. Anisimov paid special attention to the culture of thinking, cyclicality and increasing the “unaccidental” management decisions.

2. The manual orgscheme presented by the user is interpreted as a prototype of the cooperative circuit: participants → personal accounts/registry → Fund → Conversion of resources → Target areas → distribution → Result.

3. Illustrations from Book E. Sirovsky is used only as a visual and heuristic material: cycles, matrices, levels and geometry. Their metaphysical statements are not accepted here as empirically confirmed scientific statements.

4. This document is a concept of architecture. For legal, financial, state or medical use, separate specialized examinations, regulatory grounds and regulations are required.

Other published revision: EQUILIBRIUM EQUILIBRIUM_OS_1.0_Presentation.pptx · web text +

Operating system 1.0

The architecture of managing meaning, data, resources, projects and results

System • registers • hypergraph • monitoring • evidence

Strategic presentation • 2026

What is EQUILIBRIUM OS

Not a separate application, but a coordination layer over a system of systems

OBSERVATION

GOVERNANCE

FEEDBACK

Collects and links facts, events, indicators, risks and evidence.

Translates mission and goals into priorities, roles, portfolios, decisions, and control.

Compares the result with the goal, fixes lessons and starts the next cycle.

SYSL → PURPOSE → REGISTER → RESOURCES → PROJECT → RESULTS → BACKGROUND

The key idea is to make a complex ecosystem observable, manageable and evidence-based — without replacing existing legal and financial institutions.

From initial models to engineering architecture

1. Strategic project

2. Cooperative scheme

3. Matrixes and cycles

Initial state → Target state → Transition factors.

System and metasystem levels of design.

Culture of thinking and cyclical decisions.

Participant → Registry → Fund → resource → Project → Result → distribution.

Personal accounts, trust funds, transparent accounting and a closed loop.

Circles, levels and 64-position grids are used as a classification and interface language.

Metaphysical statements are not accepted as scientific facts.

The three-level model

Values, management decisions and transactions cannot be mixed

I. SYSL

Why?

Mission • values • image of the future • strategic goals

II. GOVERNANCE

What?

Portfolios • Rules • Roles • scenarios • Risks • resources

III. ACTION

What's done?

Projects • transactions • assets • events • results

Semi-rig cycle EQUILIBRIUM

The same cycle works for the project, program, organization and territory

Before

Sign in

Each cycle pass records:

• reference state
• Contribution of resources
• Solution
• Action
• result
• Proof
• lesson

SI

Feedback

PE

Contribution

PURPOSE

change of status

LYA

Distribution

MI

Accounting

SALTS

Implementation

FA

Project

15 OS modules

Modularity allows you to implement the system in stages

M01 Identity

M02 Registers

M03 Goals

M04 Projects

M05 Resources

M06 Funds

M07 Results

M08 Evidence

M09 Risks

M10 Monitoring

M11 Hypergraph

M12 Scripts

M13 Knowledge

M14 Integrations

M15 Audit

The Pilot's Core: M01 + M02 + M03 + M04 + M08 + M10 + M15

Unified registers - the foundation of the system

OBJECTS

ATTENDANCE

PROJECT

Territory • assets • infrastructure

UNIQUE ID
+ Links + History

People • Organizations • Roles

Initiatives • portfolios • stages

RESOURCES

RISKS

RESULTS

money • labor • data • rights

Threats • scenarios • measures

Item • Service • Effect • KPI

Hypergraph and Digital Double

TERRITORY

One project is simultaneously linked to objectives, resources, organizations, risks and evidence

OBJECTIVE

ORGANIZATIONS

PROJECT

Digital Double

RESOURCES

RISKS

PROOF

The graph model shows not only "what is", but also "how everything affects each other".

The project as a managed transition

From initial state to confirmed target state

INCOME STATE

MECHANISM OF TRANSITION

TARGET STATE

Issue addressed
Base Line
Limitations
Risks

Aim and KPI
Team and Roles
Budget and resources
Road map
Benchmarks
Plan of evidence

Measurable result
Evidence
Audit
Feedback

The goal without KPI is a declaration. The result without proof is a claim.

Resource and financial contour

EQUILIBRIUM keeps management records of transactions, not substitutes for licensed financial systems

Participatory

Earmarked contribution

Standby

contribution and share

specific program

Sustainability

Developments

Social

Investment

R&D and Scaling

Public Tasks

Returned Tools

Rule: Each resource has a source, owner, purpose, constraints, connection to the project and history of movement.

Five measurements of results

The monetary result is only one of the coordinates of value

ECONOMY

SOCIUM

ENVIRONMENT

TECHNOLOGIES

INSTITUTES

Revenue • Saving • Productivity

Employment • availability • trust

Impact • Recovery • Resource Efficiency

availability • localization • reliability

speed • data quality • cost reduction

Result = indicator + base line + target value + Source + Method of measurement + Responsible + Proof.

State Matrix and Scenario Engine

64-position models are translated from symbolism into formal signs and transitions

STATE

TRANSITION

SCENARIUM

A set of measurable features of an object at a certain point.

For the pilot: 8–12 base states, not 64 at once.

An event, decision, or condition that changes state.

Each transition has a trigger, owner, and journal.

A chain of acceptable transitions with an assessment of resources, risks and likely effects.

Monitoring and early warning

The system should distinguish between fact, deviation, trend, threat and forecast

GREEN

Norm

surveillance

YELLOW

Early Deviation

Checking the cause

ORANGE

Significant threat

corrective plan

RED

Critical Event

Escalation

BLUE

Lack of data

collection of evidence

Targeted IT-architecture

API-first, modularity, link graph, proof and default security

CUSTOMERS

Web • Mobile/PWA • Command Center

API / IAM

API Gateway • SSO • MFA • RBAC/ABAC

APPLE MODULES

Registries • Projects • Objectives • Risks • Scripts

DATA

PostgreSQL • Graph DB • S3 • Event Log

ANALYTICS

BI • time series • rule • forecast

SAFETY

Audit • encryption • SIEM • segregation of duties

Pilot: Prove the cycle, not the philosophy

Minimum verification unit — one real project with measurable result

MASSHTAB

DATA

DURATION

PROOF

SUCCESS

20–50 members
3–8 organizations
1–3 Project

5 registers
10–20 KPI
5–10 Risk

8–12 weeks
MVP + Pilot
without complex integrations

Full Audit Trail
documents
Validation of the result

from the application
before the result
in one circuit

Do not start with 64 states, tokenization, microservices and dozens of integrations. First, one working through cycle.

Road map

From Architecture to the Federal Supersystem

ARCHITECTURE

MVP

PILOT

PLATFORM

FEDERATION

NADSYSTEM

0–4 nd.

1–3 months

3–6 months

6–12 months

12–24 months

24+ months

Ontology • Roles • Process • Data

Registers • Projects • Objectives • Audit

users • monitoring • proof

graph • scenarios • portfolios • API

several organizations/regions

digital twins • forecast • intersystem analytics

Scaling criterion: the next level is included only after the previous result is proven.

EQUILIBRIUM

Managed development operating system

INTEGRITY + REGISTER + CYCLE + PROOF + BACKGROUND

No operation without a purpose.
No goal is without a mechanism.
No results without proof.

Version 1.0 • 2026

Another published edition: EQUILIBRIUM: BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Как_собрать_в_Единое.docx · web text +

Supersystem architecture: OKO → Analytics → Balancing → Solution → Execution → Feedback

From multiple initiatives to a single reality management framework

Version 1.0 • 24 August 2026

1. One is architecture, not organization

Putting it all together means stopping viewing individual projects, institutions and platforms as competing centers. Each element retains its own function, but begins to work through common protocols of identity, data, trust, design, execution, and feedback.

Key difference:

  • Centralization - when everything is subordinated to one body.
  • Unity is when different organs act according to compatible rules and see one picture of the state of the system.
  • EQUILIBRIUM should not be "another agency", but an operating system of coordination.

2. Roles of key contours

ContourRole in OneMain result
OKOMonitoring, signal collection, detection of deviationsSingle picture of the state
EQUILIBRIUMAnalytics, forecast, balancing, scenariosDecisions and recommendations
SFERAEnvironment for participation of people, organizations, initiatives and eventsConnectivity of participants
ECO-PPAThe mechanism of packaging threats and tasks in project programsThe portfolio of measurable impacts
SPECZASHCHITACooperation, consortia, pilots, production, implementationEnforcement of decisions
IACExpert-analytical and situational contourVerified analytics
RegistriesMemory of the system: objects, rights, projects, indicators, evidenceTrusted Data Infrastructure
Financial OutlineCapitalization, calculations, budgets, investment mechanismsResource support

3. Architecture of the One: Seven Layers

LayerContentsThe control question
1. SmyslovaObjectives, values, limitations, universal principlesWhy does the system exist?
2. IdentityPeople, organizations, territories, projects, assetsWho and what is involved?
3. DataSensors, documents, reporting, events, external sourcesWhat's going on?
4. KnowledgeOntologies, registers, classifiers, graphs of linksWhat's that supposed to mean?
5. IntellectOKO, IAC, AI-models, forecast, risk analysisWhat's likely to happen?
6. ManagementPriorities, scenarios, protocols, decision rightsWhat do you need to do?
7. ImplementationSPECZASHCHITA, partners, projects, finance, logisticsWho, when, and what does it accomplish?

4. OKO as the organ of feelings of One

The OKO should not see everything in a row, but only what is necessary to manage deviations. Its task is to turn disparate signals into an observable state model.

Channel OKOWhat WatchesWithdrawal
Natureair, water, soil, biocenosis, climatic and man-made factorsEnvironmental Indices and Threats
Personquality of life, participation, competence, access to servicessocial indicators
Economyproduction, resources, employment, logistics, investmentseconomic balances
Infrastructureenergy, transport, communications, utilities, critical facilitiesSustainability of infrastructure
Managementdeadlines, instructions, projects, budgets, regulatory restrictionsExecutive discipline
Meanings and eventsinformation trends, cultural processes, public signalsmap of changes and stresses

5. EQUILIBRIUM the Balancing Core

EQUILIBRIUM receives OKA data and not just shows the problem, but builds a map of the causes, consequences, deficits, conflicting interests and possible options for action.

  1. Record the fact and level of trust in the data.
  2. Determine the deviation from the target state.
  3. Build a cause-and-effect graph.
  4. Evaluate scenarios: do nothing/locally intervene/systemically rebuild.
  5. Calculate the resource price of the scenarios.
  6. Choose the option with the best ratio of effect, risk and cost.
  7. Transfer the decision to the executive circuit and determine measurable outcome criteria.
  8. Get feedback and update the model.

6. Unified model of data and registers

Without a common data model, the One is impossible. It is necessary to agree on basic entities that are equally understood in all modules.

Basic essenceExamplesBinding links
Subjectperson, organization, authority, communityrole, rights, competences, responsibility
Objectland, enterprise, technology, cultural value, infrastructureowner, status, geography, documents
Eventaccident, application, transaction, measurement, solution, assignmenttime, source, reliability, consequences
Projectpilot, program, concession, PPA, R&Dpurpose, budget, participants, KPI, risks
Resourcemoney, materials, energy, labor, data, rightssource, availability, limitations
Indicatorsocial, environmental, economic, technologicalmethodology, period, basic and target value
Evidenceact, touch measurement, report, photo, audit, transactionAuthor, time, immutability, verification status

7. How to Connect Technically

LevelWhat is neededPractical result
Single IDunified identifiers of subjects, objects, projects and documentssystems understand that they are talking about the same thing
API-tyreExchange standard between modulesData is not copied manually
Event tyreregistration of significant eventsOCO sees changes in real time
Knowledge GraphRelationships between entitiesCauses, Dependencies, Influences and Conflicts
Rulebookmachine-readable regulations and thresholdsDecisions are reproducible
Role-based accessSeparation of rights to view, modify and approveSafety and Responsibility
Decision logWho, on what basis and what decidedAudit and Trust
Contour of evidenceverification of the resultFighting Reporting for Reporting

8. Single control cycle

  1. OBSERVE - OCO collects signals and records deviations.
  2. UNDERSTAND — The IAC and EQUILIBRIUM verify the data and build a model.
  3. Foresee — scenarios and future states are evaluated.
  4. DECIDE - priority is chosen and a responsible coalition is appointed.
  5. RESOURCE — budget, financing, technology and executors are fixed.
  6. EXECUTIVE - SPECZASHCHITA and partners conduct a pilot or program.
  7. MEASURE - the result is confirmed by indicators and evidence.
  8. LEARN — The model, rules, and priorities are updated.

9. Control: not a pyramid, but a federation of contours

The One needs an authority architecture in which the strategic level does not take away operational work, but sets frameworks, priorities, and compatibility rules.

LevelSolvesShouldn't do
Strategicobjectives, constraints, long-term priorities, critical risksmanual management of each task
Systemicarchitecture, standards, registers, methodologies, balancesSubstitute industry experts
Softwareproject portfolios, budgets, KPI, coalitionsblurring responsibility between participants
Executivecontracts, production, logistics, implementationChange strategic rules during execution
Controlverification, audit, proof, feedbackBecome a separate center of power

10. What to combine and what to keep separate

Unite necessarilyKeep Autonomous
identifiers and directoriesbrands and public roles of projects
data model and link graphindustry methodologies and expert schools
Rules of Trust and VerificationOperations Teams
Project portfolio and indicatorslegal entities and contractual contours
Solution and feedback loopprivate technological stacks, if compatible according to API
Archive and Journal of EvidenceLocal interfaces for different audiences

11. MVP Single: minimum working version

It is necessary to start not with a global platform, but with one closed circuit, where you can prove the principle in practice.

Component MVPMinimum
Single catalogue20–50 objects/projects, 30–100 participants, single ID
OKO10–20 key indicators and event map
EQUILIBRIUM3–5 rules for identifying imbalances and scenario analysis
Links graphsubject ↔ object ↔ project ↔ resource ↔ indicator ↔ proof
The Solution Panelproblem, cause, scenarios, solution, responsible, deadline
Implementation1–3 pilots with real resources and performers
Verificationbefore/after, proof of result, independent verification

12. 90-day road map

PeriodTaskResult
Days 1–15approve core concepts, system boundaries, 7 basic entities, role contoursArchitectural Constitution v1.0
Days 16–30collect single directories, a prototype graph, an object and project cardUnified data model v1.0
Days 31–45Create an OKO: dashboard signals and 10–20 indicatorsPilot's observed model
Days 46–60enable script module EQUILIBRIUM and solution logAnalysis and solutions
Days 61–75connect SPECZASHCHITA/performers, resources and project trackerContour of execution
Days 76–90verify effect, fix architecture, select scalingWorking closed cycle

13. Constitution of the United Kingdom: 12 principles

1. Integrity: A private decision should not destroy the whole system.

2. Proof. statement, indicator and result must have a verifiable basis.

3. Observability: Critical processes must leave a digital footprint.

4. Responsibility. Each decision has a subject, basis, term and result criterion.

5. Subsidiarity. The decision is made as close to the place of action as possible.

6. Compatibility: Any new module must work through common protocols.

7. Reversibility: Critical changes must have a return or compensation plan.

8. Security: Access to data is determined by necessity, not curiosity.

9. Proportionality: The scale of the intervention corresponds to the scale of the threat.

10. Diversity. The one preserves the differences as long as they do not violate compatibility.

11. Measurability: Each program has a baseline, target, and actual state.

12. Learning error changes the rule of the system, not just the event report.

14. Signs that the One has actually arisen

IndicatorA sign of maturity
Connectivitykey objects and projects have common identifiers and connections
Detection speeddeviation falls into OKO without manual collection by departments
Speed of solutionfrom signal to assigned script and responsible runs measurable time
Proportion of results provenThe effect is confirmed by independent data
Data reuseThe same data is not entered repeatedly
Inter-circuit compatibilitynew project is connected by standard protocol
Educativenessafter the incident, the rules, models or thresholds are changed
BalanceSystemic deficits, conflicts and unmanageable risks are reduced

15. Target picture

In a mature state, the One works as the nervous system of a complex organism. I feel the changes. The registers remember. The knowledge graph understands the connections. EQUILIBRIUM compares the actual state with the desired one, predicts the consequences and suggests options. The control circuit makes the decision. Finance and resources provide action. Executive organizations are doing it. The system measures the effect and learns.

16. The first practical step

Do not combine all projects at once. Select one real pilot and through him to collect a common protocol. It is not a beautiful interface that is considered successful, but a complete cycle from signal to proven state change.

  1. Select one object or territory.
  2. Assign 10–20 OKA indicators.
  3. Create cards of subjects, objects, resources and projects.
  4. Construct a graph of causes and dependencies.
  5. Define 3–5 Balancing Rules EQUILIBRIUM.
  6. Run one ECO-PPA/design circuit.
  7. Transfer execution to the cooperation/consortium.
  8. Measure the result, fix the evidence, and update the rules.

The only thing is that it’s not a leak. IT IS COMPATIBILITY, CONNECTION AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CYCLE.

Another published edition: EQUILIBRIUM: BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_Как_собрать_в_Единое_презентация.pptx · web text +

• Unified architecture of observation, analysis, management and execution

1. What does "one" mean

Not a new add-on, but a common communication layer for all systems

General Rules

common protocols, roles, rights and life cycle of decisions

General

common identity of objects, events, projects and results

General observation

OCO forms a unified picture of what is happening

General management

EQUILIBRIUM turns data into priorities and scenarios

Overall action

executive contours bring the decision to the result

2. Architecture of the One

Seven layers of one supersystem

Meaning and principles

values, goals, norms

Strategic management

priorities, scenarios, balance

Analytics and IAC

assessment, modeling, solutions

OKO

monitoring, monitoring, early warning

Data and registries

unified entities, evidence, digital footprint

Participation platforms

SFERA, partners, institutions, communities

Implementation

ECO-PPA, SPECZASHCHITA, projects, objects

3. OKO - the sense organ of the One

Not a symbol, but a digital surveillance system

Collects signals → detects deviations → generates alerts → transmits in EQUILIBRIUM

Nature

People

OKO

Economy

Infrastructure

Projects

4. Single control cycle

From fact to measurable result

OBSERVE

UNDERSTAND

PRIORITIZE

DECIDE

PERFORM

CHECK

LEARN

Each cycle leaves a digital footprint: source → solution → resource → Executive Director → fact of implementation → effect → new model.

5. Roles of key systems

Each module does one job and does not duplicate neighbors

OKO

See

monitoring, signals, early warning

EQUILIBRIUM

Understands and balances

models, scenarios, priorities, recommendations

IAC

prepares a decision

analytics, expertise, management packages

SFERA

connects

people, initiatives, organizations, resources

ECO-PPA

Packs the impact

goals, indicators, financing, control of the result

SPECZASHCHITA

Executes

cooperation, contractors, facilities, supplies, implementation

6. Unified data model

Without a common ontology, systems will never become One.

HUMANITY

ORGANIZATION

TERRITORY

OBJECT

RISK

INITIATIVE

PROJECT

RESOURCE

DECISION

ACTION

INDICATORS

PROOF

All registries and applications must refer to these entities through uniform identifiers, versions, and evidence.

7. Single Screen OKO

One system picture for different access levels

RISKS

12

SIGNALS

37

PROJECT

84

EFFECT

+18%

• Critical deviations

• New evidence

• Decisions for approval

• Projects out of tolerance

MAP OF TERRITORIES / OBJECTS / EVENTS

8. Terms of reference

Monitoring, decision and execution should be separated

OBSERVATION

ANALYSIS

DECISION

EXECUTION

OKO

EQUILIBRIUM + IAC

Authorized Subject

ECO-PPA + SPECZASHCHITA

Records facts and deviations

Develop options and forecasts

Approves action and resource

Implement and report

9. How to connect external systems

Not "to drag everything inside", but connect through gateways and standards

State Registers

API and events

Sensors and satellites

Uniform identifiers

INTEGRATION CONTOUR OF THE UNITED

Banks and finance

Data Catalog

Marketplaces and logistics

Access rights

Scientific systems

The Evidence Journal

International Platforms

Versioning

10. MVP

A minimum version that already creates a closed management cycle

Single Entity Directory

OKO 1.0

Register of decisions

people, organizations, projects, risks, facilities

the Signals and Events Panel

Who, what, why, based on what data

Register of Execution

Effect contour

tasks, resources, deadlines, evidence

Before/After and Verification

11. Road map 90 days

From architecture to working circuit

0–30 days

31–60 days

61–90 days

Dictionary and Rules

OKO + registers

The Closed Cycle Pilot

ontology, roles, 20–30 key indicators, access protocols

dashboard, events, decisions, execution, integration of the first sources

1 territory / 1 industry / 3–5 projects / measurable effect

12. Constitution of the United

Principles that keep the system from decaying and capturing

• Single does not destroy module autonomy

• Data separated from interpretation

• Observation separated from solution

• Solution is separated from execution

• Every action has an owner

• Every resource has a source and purpose

• Every result has proof

• Algorithms have a scope of responsibility

• Access rights minimum required

• All changes are versioned

• Mistakes turn into learning

• Man remains a subject, not an object of the system

13. Formula One

Supersystem occurs only when the feedback is closed

OKO

EQUILIBRIUM

IAC

SFERA

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

RESULT

OKO sees. EQUILIBRIUM understands and balances. The One transforms understanding into a concerted action and a provable result.

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

Portal of the Five Elements: Water

Source Status: Primary Document

The Water Portal is described as a functional system for observing, preserving and restoring water as a foundation of life.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/portal-pyati-stikhiy-voda

Open on the site

Concept document • 2026

1. The Water Portal Mission

The Water Portal is a functional circuit of the EQUILIBRIUM system, designed to observe, preserve and restore the water basis of life. It integrates natural processes, people, territory, infrastructure, data, technology, and recovery economics into a single managed system.

Objectives

  • preservation of water availability and quality;
  • early identification of environmental risks and pollution;
  • restoration of water bodies and related biocenoses;
  • reducing water loss and inefficient consumption;
  • creation of a digital water passport of the territory;
  • formation of the economy of regeneration and responsible water use;
  • inclusion of citizens, science, business and the state in a single water cycle.

Place among the five elements

ElementalFunctionRole in the system
FireImpulseRuns the action
WaterLife and RecoverySupports and regenerates
AirKnowledge and communicationSends information
LandMatter and resultFixes in infrastructure
EtherMeaning and SynchronizationConnects contours

2. Five water contours

1. Source

Origins, catchment, groundwater, snow and glacial reserve, precipitation, natural formation of runoff.

2. Wednesday

Rivers, lakes, marshes, seas, soil moisture, plants, animals, microorganisms, and related biocenosis.

3. Man

Drinking water, sanitation, health, culture, recreation, safety and quality of life.

4. Economy

Industry, agriculture, energy, utilities, logistics, water-intensive production and reuse.

5. Return

Purification, additional purification, infiltration, restoration of water bodies and return of water to the natural cycle.

3. Seven Stages of the Water Cycle

1. Source - Determine the origin, volume and vulnerability of water.

2. Observation - Collect data on quantity, quality, and changes.

3. Diagnostics - Identify pollution, deficiency, loss, anomalies and sources of risk.

4. Cleansing - Remove pollution and reduce their flow.

5. Recovery: Restore the ecosystem’s ability to self-regulate.

6. Transfer — Transfer water, knowledge, responsibility, and practice to the next link.

7. Return - Return the purified water and the result of the action to the overall natural cycle.

4. Biocenosis monitoring point

The biocenous point of monitoring is the digital “sensation organ” of the territory. It observes not one indicator, but an interconnected organism of the territory and helps to distinguish natural fluctuations from dangerous changes.

Five issues of monitoring

  1. What is happening to water and the environment right now?
  2. Is the change natural or dangerous?
  3. Where is the source of the impact?
  4. How does this affect biocenosis and humans?
  5. What action is required and how urgent is it?

Observed layers

  • atmosphere and precipitation;
  • surface and groundwater;
  • soil and sediments;
  • plants, animals and microorganisms;
  • People and sanitary and hygienic indicators
  • technogenic load and infrastructure.

Baseline groups of indicators

GroupExamples
Physicaltemperature, turbidity, electrical conductivity, level, flow rate
ChemicalpH, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, metals, petroleum products, organics
Biologicalmicrobiology, phytoplankton, indicator species, DNA markers
Hydrologicallevels, floods, drought, water balance
Anthropogenicdischarges, fences, losses, accidents, land load

5. Digital water passport of the territory

Digital water passport is a dynamic model of the territory, combining registers of water bodies, users, sources of pollution, infrastructure, measurements, risks, restoration projects and history of changes.

  • The geography of the catchment and hydrographic network;
  • water supply sources and sanitary protection zones;
  • water quality and dynamics of indicators;
  • water users and the volume of the fence;
  • discharge points and potential sources of exposure;
  • treatment facilities and infrastructure;
  • Environmental risks and scenarios;
  • recovery projects and their effects;
  • Responsible organizations and response regulations.

6. 365 Water Events

The annual cycle of the Water Portal is built as 13 cycles for 28 days and one Return Day. An event is not only a public action, but also a measurable action: observation, training, cleaning, restoration, saving, research or transfer of practice.

  • 1. The "Source" Cycle
  • 2. The “Observation” Cycle
  • 3. Cycle "Clean"
  • 4. The "Health" Cycle
  • 5. Cycle "River"
  • 6. The Lake Cycle
  • 7. The "Underground Water" Cycle
  • 8. Cycle "City"
  • 9. The “Agriculture” Cycle
  • 10. Cycle "Industry"
  • 11. The "Recovery" Cycle
  • 12. "Transmission" cycle
  • 13. Cycle "Sync"

Day 365 - Day of Return: annual balance of water, results, errors and the next cycle.

7. Relay of Water

The Water Relay translates knowledge about water into a sequence of real actions. Each participant receives a simple task, performs it, fixes the result and transfers the practice further.

Get - Choose action and territory.

Make — Take measurement, assist, clean, save, or recover.

Confirm - Capture photos, data, sensor readings or act of result.

Explain — Briefly describe what has changed and why it matters.

Transfer - Transfer to the next member or organization.

Verify - Check the effect and compare it with the data of the territory.

Examples of events

  • check household leakage and eliminate it;
  • measure water quality at a local point by the available protocol;
  • clean the shore area and record the amount of waste collected;
  • teach a lesson about the water cycle;
  • restore the spring together with profile specialists;
  • collect data on the status of small watercourse;
  • Re-use of technical water in the plant.

8. The Economics of Recovery

The Water Portal’s economic model is built around preventable damage, reduced losses, reuse of water, restoration of natural capital, and a proven environmental effect.

ContourEconomic impactIndicator
Loss of waterreducing costs and loadsm³ Saved Water
CleaningReducing environmental damageMass of removed contaminants
ReuseReduction of fresh water intakePercentage of returnable water
RecoveryGrowth of natural capitalArea/length of restored ecosystems
MonitoringPrevention of accidents and damageTime to identify and respond

9. Technological contour

Sensors and IoT

online monitoring of quality, level, flow and emergency changes.

Remote sensing

Satellite and unmanned data on catchment, floods, vegetation and pollution.

Laboratory Analytics

Calibration of field data and control of complex pollutants.

AI and forecasting

search for anomalies, assessment of causes, forecast of deficit, flood and environmental risk.

GIS and Digital Double

spatial model of the pool, infrastructure and scenarios.

Registers and API

communication with state, scientific, municipal and corporate data.

10. Eight projects of the Water Portal

WATER.DATA — unified monitoring system and water passport.

WATER.SOURCE - protection of springs, watersheds and underground sources.

WATER.GOROD — reduction of leaks, smart consumption, storm and municipal infrastructure.

BIOCENOSIS — observation and restoration of a connected ecosystem.

WATER.PROM - water efficiency and closed cycles of enterprises.

WATER.AGRO - management of moisture, irrigation, runoff and pollution.

WATER.ESTAFETA — 365 events, education and public participation.

Water.Recovery - rehabilitation of water bodies and return of water to the natural cycle.

11. Management and indicators

Levels of management

  • territorial point / object;
  • municipal water circuit;
  • basin or regional contour;
  • Federal/national level;
  • international contour of transboundary basins.

Key KPI

  • the proportion of water bodies with regular monitoring;
  • the average time of detection of a dangerous anomaly;
  • the amount of water loss prevented;
  • the proportion of water reused;
  • Number of water bodies and sites restored;
  • reduction of the polluting load;
  • number of territories with a digital water passport;
  • number of participants and confirmed events of the Water Relay.

Principles of Evidence

Each claimed effect must have a reference point, a measurable indicator, a data source, a verification method, a responsible and control measurement after the intervention.

12. Road map

StageHorizonResult
1. Prototype0–3 monthsmethodology, digital passport, 3–5 monitoring points
2. Pilot3–12 monthsone territory/pool, events, analytics, recovery projects
3. Region12–24 monthsmonitoring network, municipalities, business, water economy
4. Zoom2–4 yearsInterregional system and common standards
5. International contour3–5 yearscomparable data, cross-border projects, technology exchange

13. Final architecture

The Water Portal at EQUILIBRIUM creates a continuous circuit between nature and management. Its task is to make water not the object of a belated response, but the basis of preventive management, restoration of territories and long-term security.

Water is a life that has to come back.

Other published edition: WATER_Portal_five_verse_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

Life • recovery • threads • environment memory

EQUILIBRIUM

The second portal of the unified architecture of the five elements

SOURCE → FLOW → CLEANING
→ RETURN → RETURN

The Meaning of Water Portal

Water as a universal contour of life and recovery

Water is not just a natural resource. In EQUILIBRIUM, it refers to the ability of a territory, a person, and a community to preserve, purify, recover, and maintain continuity of flows.

LIFE

FLOW

CLEANING

RECONSTRUCTION

MEMORY

access to clean water, environmental health

movement of resources, data, assistance and energy

reduction of pollution and systemic losses

Regeneration of ecosystems and territories

observing the dynamics and preserving the history of changes

Place of Water in Five Elements

Each element is responsible for its own type of system movement

WATER

FIRE

AIR

Life and Recovery

Impulse and Action

knowledge and communication

WATER

Restores
System connectivity

LAND

EFIR

Matter and Heritage

synchronization and meaning

The five contours of the Water Portal

From natural water to water as an infrastructure of life

DRINKING WATER

WATER ECOSYSTEMS

CITY WATER

Quality • availability • reliability

River • Lakes • Sea • Groundwater

water supply • water disposal • storm systems

WATER PRODUCTION

WATER AS DATA

Efficiency • closed cycles • re-use

monitoring • forecast • digital water passport

Water Cycle EQUILIBRIUM

The Seven Stages of Sustainable Water

SOURCE

OBSERVATION

FLOW

USAGE

CLEANING

RECONSTRUCTION

RETURN

What we feed

What's Happening

Where is it going

Where it creates value

What we remove

What we regenerate

How to close the cycle

The main criterion: after the cycle, the water and the system associated with it should return in a more stable state.

Biocenous point of water

A territory’s “digital sensory organ”

What's going on?

Is it natural or dangerous?

Where's the source?

level • temperature • chemistry • biology

background • trend • anomaly

Watershed • Reset • man-made load

How does it affect biocenosis?

What do we do?

plants • animals • microorganisms • people

Warning • Localization • Recovery

Digital water passport of the territory

Single data object for monitoring, planning and recovery

SOURCES

QUALITY

BALANCE

River • Wells • Tanks

Physics • Chemistry • Biology

Revenue • expense • loss

RISKS

INFRASTRUCTURE

PROJECT

drought • flood • pollution

Network • Cleaning • Hydrostructures

repair • repair • investment

The passport does not replace industry-specific state information systems; it links them to the design and analytical contour of EQUILIBRIUM.

365 Water Events

Annual rhythm of observation, care and recovery

Source

Purity

River

Lake

Groundwater

City

Soil and moisture

Ecosystem

Recovery

Savings

Reuse

Security

Return

365th day

Each event should end with the observed result: measured, cleaned, restored, trained, reduced losses or passed practice.

DAY
WATER BALANCE

Relay of Water

From personal action to restoration of the water circuit

SEE

MEASURE

SAVECH

Water monitoring

sensors, analyzes, photo fixation

Reduce losses and excess consumption

CLEAN

RECONSTRUCTION

TRANSFER

remove pollution and source of load

shore, spring, catchment, biocenosis

instruction, case, mentoring

The Water Economy

Not “trade in elements”, but cost management and recovery

INFRASTRUCTURE EFFICIENCY

INVESTMENTS IN RECONSTRUCTION

• Reduction of leaks and unaccounted losses

• Water reuse

• Renovation of sewage treatment plants and networks

• Water-saving production technologies

• Water risk insurance and management

• Water restoration projects

• Payments for the result and environmental effect

• PPPs and concessions in water infrastructure

• ECO-PPA Prevention of water threats

• ESG-IR: Provable aquatic exposures

Technological contour

From sensor to forecast and design solution

SENSORS

REMOTE

LAB

• pH • conductivity • turbidity • oxygen

satellites • UAV • aerial survey

laboratory tests and calibration

HYPERGRAPH

CONTROL ROOM

anomalies • forecast • source search

Connections: water ↔ soil ↔ biocenosis ↔ people ↔ production

Risk Map • Scripts • Solutions • Effect

Eight projects of the Water Portal

Modular program for territories and industries

Net source

The Living River

Smart City of Water

Water production

Protection and restoration of sources

rivers, coasts, catchments

networks, showers, reuse

closed cycles and water efficiency

Biocenosis of water

Water safety

Digital water passport

The Recovery Laboratory

Monitoring of ecosystems

floods, droughts, accidents

data, hypergraph, forecast

pilots, methods, verification

Road map

From one monitoring point to the water contour of the territory

STAGE 1

Basic diagnostics

objects • data • risks • participants

STAGE 2

Pilot Point

sensors • laboratory • biocenosis map

STAGE 3

Digital passport

balance • story • scenarios

STAGE 4

Recovery projects

Network • Sources • Shore • Cleaning

STAGE 5

The Economics of Result

Funding for a Confirmed Effect

STAGE 6

Scaling

swimming pool • region • interregional network

WATER

Water as a system of life

The Water Portal connects the natural environment, human, technology and the recovery economy

FORMULA PORTAL

SOURCE
↓
FLOW
↓
CLEANING
↓
RECONSTRUCTION
↓
RETURN

not an object of consumption,
A continuous cycle of life

EQUILIBRIUM: Save the value of the flow, restore the broken and return the system to more viability than has been withdrawn.

PORTAL OF FIVE THIRD • WATER • EQUILIBRIUM • 24.08.2026

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

Portal of the Five Elements: Air

Source Status: Primary Document

The Air Portal links knowledge, meanings, signals and decisions between man, society, science, culture, economy and the state.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/portal-pyati-stikhiy-vozdukh

Open on the site

Concept document • 2026

1. The Air Portal Mission

Air portal - information and communication circuit EQUILIBRIUM. It provides the movement of knowledge, meanings, signals and decisions between a person, a community, a science, a culture, an economy and a state.

Objectives

  • creation of a single environment of reliable knowledge and communication;
  • reduction of information noise and distortion;
  • Accelerating the transfer of proven knowledge to practice;
  • development of a culture of dialogue, language and mutual understanding;
  • formation of early warning and feedback systems;
  • creation of open educational and expert contours;
  • Connecting people, institutions, and territories through compatible data and meanings.

Place among the five elements

ElementalFunctionRole in the system
FireImpulseRuns the action
WaterLife and RecoverySupports and regenerates
AirKnowledge and communicationTransmits and connects
LandMatter and resultSecures in form and infrastructure
EtherMeaning and SynchronizationCombines levels and rhythms

2. The five contours of air

1. Breathing

Physiological and ecological basis: air quality, rhythm, environmental health.

2. Signal

Data, observations, news, warnings and primary fixation of changes.

3. Language

Concepts, dictionaries, classifiers, semantics and the ability of systems to understand each other.

4. Communications

Communication networks, media, education, expert communities and feedback.

5. Knowledge

Verified, explainable and applicable information turned into a solution.

3. Seven Stages of the Air Cycle

1. Observation is to fix a signal or change.

2. Verification - to establish the source, reliability and context.

3. Understanding: Linking data to causes and consequences.

4. Formulation is to express knowledge clearly and without too much noise.

5. Transfer - deliver to the right addressee in the right form.

6. Dialogue — get feedback and clarification.

7. Update - adjust the knowledge and return it to the general outline.

4. NEUROSVOD Knowledge and Meanings

NEUROSVOD Air is a digital environment that combines documents, data, concepts, experts, discussions and solutions. Its task is to preserve the origin of knowledge and to show the connections between facts, hypotheses and conclusions.

Main functions

  • semantic search and linked archive;
  • the register of sources and the level of confidence in them;
  • dictionary of concepts EQUILIBRIUM;
  • map of experts, schools and scientific areas;
  • versionality of knowledge and fixation of changes;
  • verification and verification protocols;
  • AI-assistant for synthesizing, but not replacing, a responsible solution.

5. Information passport of the territory

  • key data sources and communication channels;
  • map of critical communications infrastructure;
  • local media and public channels;
  • scientific and educational centers;
  • information risks and data deficit areas;
  • outline of public notification;
  • Open Data Registry and API;
  • history of significant signals, decisions and feedback.

6. 365 Air Events

365 events turn the Air Portal into an annual rhythm of learning, observation, dialogue and knowledge transfer. 13 Cycles 28 the Day of Silence and Reconciliation.

  • 1. The "breath" cycle
  • 2. The “Observation” Cycle
  • 3. The "Source" Cycle
  • 4. The "Check" Cycle
  • 5. Cycle "Language"
  • 6. Cycle "Dialogue"
  • 7. The "Knowledge" Cycle
  • 8. Cycle "Training"
  • 9. Cycle "Media"
  • 10. Cycle "Communication"
  • 11. The "Warning" Cycle
  • 12. "Transmission" cycle
  • 13. Cycle "Sync"

Day 365 - Day of Silence and Reconciliation: stop information flow for the annual analysis of the quality of knowledge and communications.

7. Air Relay

To hear is to receive a meaningful signal or question.

Check - find the original source and confirmation.

To understand is to formulate the essence in your own words.

To explain is to transfer knowledge to another without distortion.

Linking - connecting knowledge with a practical task.

Return - get feedback and update the general code.

8. Economics of Knowledge and Communication

The economy of Air is built on reducing the cost of search, errors and misunderstandings, as well as on increasing the rate of transfer of proven knowledge to production, education, management and culture.

ContourEffectIndicator
Search for knowledgereduced search timeTime to Reliable Response
TransmissionReduction of distortionsPercentage of correctly understood messages
TrainingAcceleration of developmentTime to practical application
WarningReduction of damageTime of delivery warning
Expertisequality of solutionsPercentage of decisions with a confirmed base

9. Technological contour

Semantic graph

connections of concepts, documents, events and experts.

AI and NLP

search, classification, translation, summation, identification of contradictions.

Communication systems

Secure and public channels, reservation.

Media Analytics

Map of information flows and early signals.

Opened API

Communication with government, scientific and corporate systems.

Digital identity of the source

origin of data, authorship and version.

10. Eight projects of the Air Portal

Knowledge is a single NEUROSVOD and semantic graph.

AIR.LANGUAGE - dictionaries, classifiers and intersystem semantics.

AIR.DIALOGUE is a platform for public and expert discussion.

AIR. EDUCATION - relay races of knowledge and training through transfer.

AIR.MEDIA is a network of verified cases and explanatory journalism.

AIR.SIGNAL - early warning and operational communications.

AIR.Communications - sustainable digital and territorial communications.

AIR.PEREVOD — Interlingual and intercultural exchange of knowledge.

11. Control and KPI

  • average time from signal to verified knowledge;
  • the proportion of materials with proven origin;
  • number of active educational and expert relations;
  • coverage of early warning systems;
  • the share of knowledge that has come to practical application;
  • level of feedback and error correction;
  • Number of participants 365 Air events.

12. Road map

StageHorizonResult
1. Prototype0–3 monthsdictionary, source code, basic knowledge graph
2. Pilot3–12 monthsone territory/industry, dialogue and relay races
3. Network12–24 monthsintegration of education, media and experts
4. Zoom2–4 yearsInterregional NEUROSVOD and Standards
5. International contour3–5 yearstranslation, compatible dictionaries, knowledge sharing

13. Final architecture

The Air Portal makes EQUILIBRIUM able to hear, understand, and connect. Its result is not a flow of information, but an environment of trust and meaningful communication.

AIR is knowledge that should move freely and retain meaning.

Other published edition: AIR_Portal_five_verse_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

Portal of the Five Elements

Knowledge • Communication • Language • Information • Breathing

Signal → Meaning → Communication → Transmission → Feedback

Concept • 2026

AIR: Mission

Functional role in the system EQUILIBRIUM

Mission

The main principle

The Air Portal provides the movement of knowledge, meanings, signals and decisions between a person, society, science, culture, economy and the state.

Information becomes knowledge only after it is tested, understood and transmitted in a form suitable for action.

Signal → Meaning → Communication → Transmission → Feedback

The Five Circuits

How the air element is revealed in the system

Breathing

Signal

Language

Air quality, environmental health and life rhythm.

Data, observations, news and warnings.

Concepts, dictionaries, classifiers and semantics.

Contact

Knowledge

Media, education, communities and feedback.

Verified and applicable information.

Seven Stages of the Cycle

Operational logic of the Air Portal

1. Monitoring

7. Update

2. Verification

AIR

6. Dialogue

3. Understanding

5. Transfer

4. Formulation

Digital passport

Condition, connections, risks, actions and confirmed effect

a single map of objects, sources and participants;

the current state and dynamics of key indicators;

risks, limitations and dependencies;

projects, decisions and responsible;

history of changes and proof of result;

API and communication with external registries.

Output Product

Not a static report, but an updated map:
"state → cause → effect → effect → next cycle".

365 events

13 Cycles × 28 days + Day of Return

Breathing

Observation

Source

Verification

Language

Dialogue

Knowledge

Training

Media

Contact

Warning

Transmission

365
Day of Return

Synchronization

Air Relay

The action should move from one participant to the next.

Observation

Verification

Understanding

Formulation

Transmission

Dialogue

Get Meaning → do → confirm → explain → pass → update general outline

Economics of Effect

How a portal creates measurable social and economic value

Search for knowledge

reduced search time

Time to Reliable Response

Transmission

Reduction of distortions

Percentage of correctly understood messages

Training

Acceleration of development

Time to practical application

Warning

Reduction of damage

Time of delivery warning

Expertise

Increased quality of solutions

Percentage of decisions with evidence

Technological contour

Digital infrastructure of the Portal

Semantic graph

AI and NLP

Communication systems

Relationships of concepts, documents and experts.

Search, classification, translation, synthesis.

Sustainable channels and reservations.

Media Analytics

Opened API

Identity of the source

Map of flows and early signals.

External registries and platforms.

Origin, authorship and version.

8 projects Portal

Project outline for pilot and scaling

AIR. KNOWLEDGE

AIR.LANGUAGE

NEUROSVOD and semantic graph.

Dictionaries and intersystem semantics.

AIR.DIALOGUE

AIR. EDUCATION

Expert and public discussion.

Learning through transmission.

AIR.MEDIA

AIR.SIGNAL

Verified cases and explanation.

Early warning.

AIR.CONNECTION

AIR.PEREVOD

A sustainable communication environment.

Interlingual exchange of knowledge.

Management and KPI

We measure not activity for the sake of activity, but the real effect

KPI 1

KPI 2

time from signal to verified knowledge

Proportion of materials with proven origin

KPI 3

KPI 4

number of active expert and educational relations

Early warning systems coverage

KPI 5

KPI 6

Percentage of knowledge that has come to practical application

speed of correction of detected errors

Road map

From prototype to large-scale system

0–3 months

3–12 months

12–24 months

2–4 years

3–5 years

Prototype

Pilot

Network

Scale

International contour

Each stage ends with a measurable result and a decision on the next scale.

Connection of the Five Elements

The portal works only as part of the whole

FIRE

impulse

EFIR

WATER

Synchronization

Recovery

EQUILIBRIUM

LAND

AIR

Form

Knowledge

AIR

Signal → Meaning → Communication → Transmission → Feedback

AIR is knowledge that moves freely and retains meaning.

Portal of the Five Elements • EQUILIBRIUM

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

Portal of the Five Elements: Earth

Source Status: Primary Document

The Earth Portal turns knowledge, decisions and public energy into lasting facilities, territories, products, infrastructure and heritage.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/portal-pyati-stikhiy-zemlya

Open on the site

Matter • Labor • Territory • Production • Heritage

Base → Work → Form → Result → Legacy

Concept • 2026

Earth: Mission

Functional role in the system EQUILIBRIUM

Mission

The main principle

The Earth Portal turns knowledge, decisions and public energy into lasting facilities, territories, products, infrastructure and heritage.

The idea becomes a reality when it is fixed in material form, has a responsibility, a life cycle and a measurable result.

Base → Work → Form → Result → Legacy

The Five Circuits

How the Earth is revealed in the system

Territory

Resource

Work

Landscape, soil, land use and space.

Materials, raw materials, energy and natural capital.

Man, profession, skill and cooperation.

Infrastructure

Heritage

Objects, networks, production and logistics.

Durability, repair and transfer to future generations.

Seven Stages of the Cycle

Operational logic of the Earth Portal

1. Foundation

7. Inheritance

2. Design

LAND

6. Regeneration

3. Cooperation

5. Operation

4. Establishment

Digital passport

Condition, connections, risks, actions and confirmed effect

a single map of objects, sources and participants;

the current state and dynamics of key indicators;

risks, limitations and dependencies;

projects, decisions and responsible;

history of changes and proof of result;

API and communication with external registries.

Output Product

Not a static report, but an updated map:
"state → cause → effect → effect → next cycle".

365 events

13 Cycles × 28 days + Day of Return

Basis

Soil

Material

Work

Craft

House

City

Production

Infrastructure

Cooperation

Recovery

Heritage

365
Day of Return

Synchronization

Earth Relay

The action should move from one participant to the next.

Basis

Design

Cooperation

Establishment

Operation

Regeneration

Get Meaning → do → confirm → explain → pass → update general outline

Economics of Effect

How a portal creates measurable social and economic value

Materials

Waste reduction

Proportion of secondary raw materials

Infrastructure

increase in service life

Cost of life cycle

Work

productivity growth

value per person-hour

Territory

Recovery of capital

area of restored land

Cooperation

Localization of chains

Proportion of local value added

Technological contour

Digital infrastructure of the Portal

GIS and Digital Double

BIM / TIM

Materials Science

Spatial model of the territory.

The life cycle of buildings and structures.

New materials and secondary raw materials.

Robotization

IoT

Asset registers

Safety and productivity.

Predictive maintenance of infrastructure.

Origin, property and condition.

8 projects Portal

Project outline for pilot and scaling

LAND.TERRITORY

EARTH.SHOW

Digital passport and development plan.

Fertility, reclamation and recovery.

LAND. MATERIAL

EARTH. LABOUR

New and Circular Materials.

The exchange of work, skills and skill.

Earth.Production

LAND.CITY

Industrial contour of technology.

Life cycle infrastructure.

LAND.HERITAGE

LAND. RETURN

Storage and restoration of valuables.

Repair, processing and reuse.

Management and KPI

We measure not activity for the sake of activity, but the real effect

KPI 1

KPI 2

Percentage of objects with a digital passport

lifetime and cost of life

KPI 3

KPI 4

volume of returned materials

area of restored land

KPI 5

KPI 6

Percentage of localized production chains

Number of retained and transferred competencies

Road map

From prototype to large-scale system

0–3 months

3–12 months

12–24 months

2–4 years

3–5 years

Prototype

Pilot

Network

Scale

International contour

Each stage ends with a measurable result and a decision on the next scale.

Connection of the Five Elements

The portal works only as part of the whole

FIRE

impulse

EFIR

WATER

Synchronization

Recovery

EQUILIBRIUM

LAND

AIR

Form

Knowledge

LAND

Base → Work → Form → Result → Legacy

Earth is what remains after action.

Portal of the Five Elements • EQUILIBRIUM

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

Portal of the Five Elements: Ether

Source Status: Primary Document

The Ether Portal is described as an overarching coordination system connecting the goals, rhythms, data, decisions and responsibilities of the other elements.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/portal-pyati-stikhiy-efir

Open on the site

Concept document • 2026

1. The Ether Portal Mission

The ether portal is the suprasystem coordination circuit EQUILIBRIUM. It does not replace the rest of the elements, but links their goals, rhythms, data, decisions and responsibility into a single picture.

Objectives

  • harmonization of goals and indicators of the five elements;
  • synchronization of projects, events and cycles;
  • identification of systemic contradictions and side effects;
  • creation of a common language of meanings and decisions;
  • long-term scenario planning;
  • Linking local action to a system-wide outcome;
  • maintaining a balance between man, nature, economy and future generations.

Place among the five elements

ElementalFunctionRole in the system
FireImpulseRuns the action
WaterLife and RecoverySupports and regenerates
AirKnowledge and communicationTransmits and connects
LandMatter and resultSecures in form and infrastructure
EtherMeaning and SynchronizationCombines levels and rhythms

2. The Five Circuits of Ether

1. Meaning

Why does the system exist, what values and results does it protect?

2. Time

cycles, horizons, sequence and transition points.

3. Connectivity

relations between portals, projects, institutions and territories.

4. Balance

trade-offs, limitations, feedback and sustainability.

5. Future

scenarios, early signals and preparation for possible changes.

3. The Seven Stages of the Ether Cycle

1. Gathering - see the state of all contours.

2. Binding is finding dependencies and common nodes.

3. Understanding - to determine the overall picture and contradictions.

4. Scenarios: Consider alternative trajectories.

5. Harmonization: Synchronize goals, resources, and timelines.

6. Monitoring - to monitor the consequences of the decision.

7. Reassembly - update the architecture when the environment changes.

4. Hypergraph EQUILIBRIUM

Hypergraph Ether is a digital map of systems. Nodes are people, organizations, territories, projects, events, knowledge, resources and risks; hyperconnections are relationships in which several elements are involved at once.

What the hypergraph shows

  • which projects depend on the same resources;
  • where the decisions of one portal create a risk for another;
  • Which organizations and people are the key connecting nodes;
  • what events are synchronized in time;
  • where there is no liability or data;
  • Which scenarios have the maximum cumulative effect?

5. Passport of system connectivity

  • mission and measurable goals;
  • five portals and their current state;
  • key projects and inter-project dependencies;
  • calendar of cycles and control points;
  • the register of decisions and their grounds;
  • Map of risks and conflicts of objectives;
  • system of indicators of overall effect;
  • architecture and history of change.

6. 365 events Ether

365 Ether events is a calendar of coordination and comprehension of the system. It combines daily activities with weekly, 28-day, quarterly and annual cycles.

  • 1. The "meaning" cycle
  • 2. The “Observation” Cycle
  • 3. The "Communication" Cycle
  • 4. Cycle "Time"
  • 5. The Balance Cycle
  • 6. Cycle "Dialogue"
  • 7. Cycle "Scenario"
  • 8. The "Solution" Cycle
  • 9. The "Responsibility" Cycle
  • 10. Cycle "Sync"
  • 11. The "Future" Cycle
  • 12. The "Return" Cycle
  • 13. Cycle "Reassembly"

Day 365 - Day of the One: an annual reassembly of the map of goals, results and the next big cycle.

7. Ether Relay

To see the whole is to look at the task through all the affected contours.

Find a connection - identify key dependencies.

Agree — to bring together the goals and limitations of the participants.

To fix - to record the decision and the grounds.

To observe is to measure the consequences.

To convey the context is to convey to the next participant not only the decision, but also the meaning.

8. The Economics of Systemic Effect

Ether economics assesses the effect of coherence: prevented project conflicts, reduced duplication, reduced systemic risks, and increased value from cooperation.

ContourEffectIndicator
CoordinationReducing DuplicationResource savings
ScenarioRisk reductionPrevented damage
SynchronizationAcceleration of projectsTime to result
Connectivitygrowth of cooperationJointly created value
System trainingFewer repeated errorsPercentage of lessons learned

9. Technological contour

Hypergraphs

multidimensional relationships between system objects.

Digital twins

modeling of territories, infrastructures and programs.

AI-scripting

search for options and sensitivity of decisions.

Ontology

A common language of essences and relationships.

Event Architecture

synchronization of processes and signals.

System Balance Panel

Joint monitoring of key indicators.

10. Eight projects of the portal

EFER.HYPERGRAPH — map of system connections.

ETHER.CYCLES is a single science and a calendar of cycles.

EFIR.SCENARIES - foresight and modeling of the future.

EFIR.BALANS is a system-wide indicator panel.

EFIR.SOLVEMENTS - the register of decisions, grounds and consequences.

Efir.SINCHRON - coordination of programs and events.

Efir.SMYSL — NEUROSVOD values, goals and narratives.

EFIR.HERITAGE - system memory and transfer of experience.

11. Control and KPI

  • the proportion of projects with described intersystem dependencies;
  • the number of identified and resolved conflicts goals;
  • the average time of approval of the interdepartmental decision;
  • the proportion of decisions followed by the measurement of the effect;
  • Reducing duplication of resources and activities;
  • The number of scenarios tested prior to the launch of the solutions;
  • The number of lessons that have been transferred to new cycles.

12. Road map

StageHorizonResult
1. Map0–3 monthsOntology and Basic Hypergraph
2. Pilot3–12 monthssynchronization of 5–10 projects
3. Supersystem12–24 monthsscenarios, decision register, balance panel
4. Zoom2–4 yearsInterregional Coordination Architecture
5. International contour3–5 yearscompatible models and global scenarios

13. Final architecture

The ether portal makes the five elements not a set of separate programs, but a coherent system. It keeps context, synchronizes time, and helps you see the consequences of decisions outside of a single department, project, or generation.

EFIR is the coherence by which the whole becomes greater than the sum of the parts.

Other published editorial board: Efir Efir_Portal_five_verse_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

Portal of the Five Elements

Meaning • Synchronization • Time • Connectivity • Over-System

Meaning → Connectivity → Rhythm → Synchronization → Integrity

Concept • 2026

EFIR: Mission

Functional role in the system EQUILIBRIUM

Mission

The main principle

The ether portal links the goals, rhythms, data, decisions and responsibility of the five elements into a single picture of the system of systems.

Integrity does not arise from centralizing all control, but from aligning goals, rules, time, and interfaces between autonomous circuits.

Meaning → Connectivity → Rhythm → Synchronization → Integrity

The Five Circuits

How the element of ether is revealed in the system

Meaning

Time

Connectivity

Why does the system exist and what does it protect?

Cycles, horizons and transition points.

Relationships between projects, people and territories.

Balance

Future

Limitations, compromises and feedback.

Scenarios and preparation for possible changes.

Seven Stages of the Cycle

The Operational Logic of the Ether Portal

1. Collection

7. Reassembly

2. Binding

EFIR

6. Monitoring

3. Understanding

5. Harmonization

4. Scenario

Digital passport

Condition, connections, risks, actions and confirmed effect

a single map of objects, sources and participants;

the current state and dynamics of key indicators;

risks, limitations and dependencies;

projects, decisions and responsible;

history of changes and proof of result;

API and communication with external registries.

Output Product

Not a static report, but an updated map:
"state → cause → effect → effect → next cycle".

365 events

13 Cycles × 28 days + Day of Return

Meaning

Observation

Connectivity

Time

Balance

Dialogue

Scenario

Decision

Responsibility

Synchronization

Future

Return

365
Day of Return

Reassembly

Relay Ether

The action should move from one participant to the next.

Collection

Binding

Understanding

Scenario

Harmonization

Observation

Get Meaning → do → confirm → explain → pass → update general outline

Economics of Effect

How a portal creates measurable social and economic value

Coordination

Reducing Duplication

Resource savings

Scenario

Risk reduction

Prevented damage

Synchronization

Acceleration of projects

Time to result

Connectivity

growth of cooperation

Jointly created value

System training

Fewer repeated errors

Percentage of lessons learned

Technological contour

Digital infrastructure of the Portal

Hypergraphs

Digital twins

AI-scripting

Multi-dimensional relationships of system elements.

Modeling of territories and programs.

Alternatives and Sensitivity.

Ontology

Event Architecture

Balance Panel

A common language of essences and relationships.

Sync processes and signals.

Joint monitoring of key indicators.

8 projects Portal

Project outline for pilot and scaling

ETHER.HYPERGRAPH

ETHER.CYCLES

Map of system connections.

Science and the Cycle Calendar.

ETHER.SCENARIES

EFIR.BALANS

Foresight and modeling of the future.

System-wide indicator panel.

ETHER.Decisions

EFER.SINCHRON

Register of decisions and consequences.

Coordination of programs and events.

EFIR.SMYSL

ETHER.HERITAGE

NEUROSVOD values and goals.

Memory systems and transfer of experience.

Management and KPI

We measure not activity for the sake of activity, but the real effect

KPI 1

KPI 2

Percentage of projects with described dependencies

Number of conflict identified and resolved

KPI 3

KPI 4

Time of intercontour coordination of the decision

proportion of decisions followed by effect measurement

KPI 5

KPI 6

Reducing duplication of resources

Percentage of lessons transferred to new cycles

Road map

From prototype to large-scale system

0–3 months

3–12 months

12–24 months

2–4 years

3–5 years

Prototype

Pilot

Network

Scale

International contour

Each stage ends with a measurable result and a decision on the next scale.

Connection of the Five Elements

The portal works only as part of the whole

FIRE

impulse

EFIR

WATER

Synchronization

Recovery

EQUILIBRIUM

LAND

AIR

Form

Knowledge

EFIR

Meaning → Connectivity → Rhythm → Synchronization → Integrity

EFIR is the coherence by which the whole becomes greater than the sum of the parts.

Portal of the Five Elements • EQUILIBRIUM

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM Classification Dictionary for the Heritage Preservation Archive

Source Status: Primary Document

The dictionary systematizes the terms and classification bases used in materials from EQUILIBRIUM and the Heritage Preservation Archive.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/slovar-klassifikator-ekvilibrium-orion

Open on the site

ORION22:22 • Parsing Smart Portal

Version 1.0 • Conceptual architecture of a single register language

Purpose of the document: to create a single dictionary, classifier and coding system for the description of objects of material, intangible, documentary, scientific, technological, natural, digital and civilizational heritage.

The basic principle is that one object can simultaneously belong to several registries, but must have one stable identifier, a single digital passport and a transparent communication system.

"ORION22:22" in this architecture is used as an internal symbolic input circuit identifier and data consistency label; it does not replace legal, scientific, or government identifiers.

1. Architecture of the register dictionary

A classifier dictionary is built as an ontological system in which a term, object, event, subject, right, source, territory, and digital representation form an interconnected graph. Each entry must be suitable for both human, search engine, AI-model, archivist, researcher, lawyer and registry operator.

Object = ID + Class + Registries + Attributes + Sources + Contacts + Rights + Status + Version

2. Basic Registry Classifier R01–R22

CodeRegisterContents
R01Persons and bearers of heritageAuthors, owners, researchers, masters, dynasties, witnesses, keepers.
R02Organizations and institutionsMuseums, archives, libraries, foundations, universities, laboratories, communities, states.
R03Material objectsPaintings, sculptures, artifacts, household items, appliances, products, collections.
R04Documentary heritageManuscripts, books, maps, letters, drawings, protocols, film, photo and audio documents.
R05Intangible heritageLanguages, traditions, rituals, music, oral traditions, crafts, schools of excellence.
R06Architecture and TerritoriesMonuments, ensembles, historical zones, sacred places, cultural landscapes.
R07Natural heritageBiocenoses, geological objects, rare species, natural areas, reference ecosystems.
R08Scientific heritageTheories, discoveries, methods, schools, instruments, archives of experiments, collections of samples.
R09Technological heritageInventions, technologies, production lines, engineering solutions, industrial archives.
R10Digital heritageSites, databases, digital art, program code, models, digital twins.
R11Events and EpochsHistorical events, expeditions, exhibitions, projects, cultural periods, civilization stages.
R12Collections and complexesFunds, collections, archival complexes, libraries, treasures, depository units.
R13Rights and legal statusesProperty, copyrights, licenses, restrictions, protection obligations, inheritance.
R14Origin and provenanceChains of ownership, movement, restitution, attribution, authenticity, history of being.
R15Condition and safetyPhysical condition, risks, restoration, loss, damage, storage requirements.
R16Value and significanceHistorical, cultural, scientific, spiritual, social, market and strategic value.
R17Digital Copies and MediaScans, photos, 3D, audio, video, spectral images, metadata, checksums.
R18Sources and evidenceCatalogues, acts, publications, examinations, archival references, certificates, datasets.
R19Access and mode of useOpen, restricted, confidential, official, special, research access.
R20Risks and threatsLoss, fire, war, vandalism, climate, cyber risk, illegal trafficking, degradation of the carrier.
R21Conservation measuresConservation, restoration, backup, insurance, evacuation, monitoring.
R22Connections and ContextsRelationships object-person-place-event-school-source-collection-right.

3. Unique identifier of the heritage object

A single identifier must be stable, independent of change of owner, name, status or storage location. For the internal system, a format is offered that separates the permanent machine identifier from the human-readable classification code.

Example of human-readable code: EQ-HER-R04-R12-R14-000001-REV03

Where is EQ — EQUILIBRIUM; HER — Domain Heritage; R04/R12/R14 — Essential registry supplies; 000001 — unique room; REV03 — recording version.

4. Passport of the registry record

FieldPurposeStatus
IDUnique identifierMandatory
NAMECanonical nameMandatory
ALIASESVariants of namesOptional
TYPEObject typeMandatory
REGISTRYRegistry codesMandatory
DATEDate/periodIf possible
PLACEPlace of origin/locationIf possible
CREATORAuthor/creator/carrierIf possible
OWNEROwner/holderIf applicable
PROVENANCEProvenanceCritically important
AUTHAuthentication statusIf applicable
RIGHTSLegal statusMandatory upon publication
ACCESSAccess ModeMandatory
CONDITIONState of preservationFor physical objects
VALUECategories of significanceRecommended
SOURCESources of ConfirmationMandatory
MEDIADigital representationsRecommended
LINKSRelated EntitiesRecommended
RISKRisksRecommended
PRESERVEConservation measuresRecommended
HASHDigital object checksumFor digital copies
VERSIONRecording versionMandatory

5. Controlled dictionaries

CodeDictionaryAcceptable values / examples
V01Object typepainting; manuscript; coin; construction; archive; tradition; language; technology; Software; sample; collection
V02Authentication statusconfirmed; probably; controversial; unknown; copy; reconstruction; replica
V03Statestable; satisfactory; vulnerable; emergency; fragmentary; lost
V04Level of significancelocal; regional; national; interstate; global; unique
V05Access Modeopen; registration; research; limited; confidential; special
V06Degree of digitalizationno; base card; photo; full scan; 3D; digital twin; multimodal model
V07Risklow; moderate; high; critical
V08Source verificationunverified; initial verification; confirmed; expertly confirmed; independent verification

6. Portal of smart Parsing: register conveyor

StageFunctionResult
P01AppointmentsURL, file, image, PDF, database, API, text, audio, video.
P02ExtractSelect text, metadata, names, dates, places, numbers, tables, links.
P03NormalizationSingle dates, names, languages, units of measurement, geographical names.
P04EssenceRecognition of persons, organizations, objects, events, places, sources.
P05ClassificationAssigning one or more codes R01 to R22.
P06ComparisonSearch for duplicates, name variants, conflicting attributions, and related records.
P07EvidenceBinding of each significant field to the source and level of confidence.
P08VerificationAutomatic and expert verification of critical records.
P09PublicationEntries in the Heritage Archive with the version and the change log.
P10UpdateRe-parsing sources, comparing versions, signaling changes.

7. Cross-classification matrix

Each object allows multiple registry membership. A central object is not duplicated; instead, links are created between its single ID and the corresponding registers.

Example of objectRelated registries
Ancient manuscriptR04, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22
Historic buildingR06, R11, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22
Folk Song TraditionR01, R05, R11, R16, R17, R18, R19, R22
Scientific instrumentR03, R08, R09, R12, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R22
Digital model of the monumentR06, R10, R17, R18, R19, R22
Treasure / archaeological complexR03, R06, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22

8. Evidence and Confidence Index

For automatic parsing, it is necessary to separate fact from hypothesis. Each statement extracted receives a source, source type, date of circulation, degree of independence, and machine estimate of confidence; critical attributes undergo expert verification.

Confidence index: C = w₁S + w₂I + w₃A + w₄X, where S is the quality of the source, I is the independence of confirmations, A is the consistency of attribution, X is expert verification.

ClassRangeInterpretation
C00–0,39Unconfirmed Hypothesis
C10,40–0,59Preliminary Confirmation
C20,60–0,79Sufficient evidence
C30,80–0,94High evidence
C40,95–1,00Verified recording

9. Hierarchy of registers

Level A - Planetary

Objects and phenomena of world significance, interstate and universal registers.

Level B - National

State registers of cultural, natural, scientific and documentary heritage.

Level C - Regional

registers of subjects, regions, territories, historical and cultural zones.

Level D - Municipal / Local

local archives, museums, communities, organizations, private collections.

Level E - Personal / Family

family archives, private meetings, personal digital funds.

Level F - Machine Metarester

consolidated index EQUILIBRIUM, combining records without assigning the rights of the primary registry.

10. ORION22:22 As a symbolic outline

In the architecture of the project "ORION22:22" it is proposed to use as an internal symbolic code the coordination of 22 basic registers and two directions of data movement: entry into the Archive and exit to the knowledge system. The designation 22:22 can be used in navigation, interface, version marking and infographics, but should not replace official numbers, archive ciphers, DOI, ISBN, museum inventory numbers, cadastral or other legally significant identifiers.

Meaningful formula: 22 Registry × 2 Directions = "Save ↔ Linking.

11. Registry card template

Card fieldValue
Registry codeR__
Name
Purpose
Objects of account
Minimum required fields
Controlled dictionaries
External identifiers
Primary data sources
Legal regime
Verification rules
Links to other registries
Rules of Deduplication
Update Period
Responsible contour
Level of access
Schema Version

12. Implementation of the classifier

1. Approve R01 ?R22 as the top level of classification and fix the coding rules.

2. Create directories V01-V08 and assign dictionary owners.

3. Determine the minimum passport of the object and the mandatory fields for each class.

4. Compile a correspondence table with external state, museum, archival, library, scientific and international identifiers.

5. Create parsing and normalization rules for each source type.

6. Enter a proof journal and a confidence index for each statement.

7. Run deduplication and graph connections between entities.

8. Create expert queues for controversial records and conflicting attributions.

9. Expand versioning, change log, and immutable checksums of digital objects.

10. To display a single interface of the Heritage Preservation Archive with a search by registers, time, territory, connections and level of significance.

Annex A. Basic dictionary terms EQUILIBRIUM

TermDefinition
Heritage propertyAny identifiable entity having cultural, historical, scientific, natural, technological, spiritual or social value.
Registerstructured set of records of the same class of accounting with established rules of identification, description and updating.
MetareisterAn index that links records from different registries without destroying their original identity and origin.
Provenancedocumented history of the origin, ownership, movement and attribution of the object.
Digital passportA machine-readable set of normalized object attributes with sources and versions.
Digital twinstructured digital representation of an object capable of including geometry, properties, state, history, and communications.
OntologyA formal system of concepts, relationships, and rules that provides a unified understanding of data.
Deduplicationthe process of detecting and combining information related to a single object, without loss of sources and versions.
Smart Parsingautomated extraction, normalization, classification, comparison and verification of data from heterogeneous sources.
EvidenceThe extent to which the claim is supported by verifiable sources and independent evidence.
Semantic connectiontyped relation between objects: created, owned, was, participated, is part of, mentioned in, associated with.
Recording versiona fixed state of data at a certain point, preserving the history of changes.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.pptx · Web Text +

Heritage Preservation Archive

22:22

ORION22:22 • Parsing Smart Portal

Unified register language for human, archive, search engine and AI

Version 1.0

One object - many registers - one digital passport

Basic principle of architecture

R14
Provenance

SINGLE DIGITAL PASSPORT

R17
digital copy

R03
object

Stable ID

CLASS

object type and domain

OBJECT
HERITAGE

REGISTERS

multiple membership R01-R22

SOURCES

Evidence and origin of data

R22
Communications

R18
evidence

RIGHTS

Possession and use regimes

Versions

history of changes and integrity control

EQ-HER-R04-R12-R14-000001-REV03

R13
Law

22 Basic Registry R01–R22

Connections

Institutions

Persona

Canonical Upper Classifier Tree

R22

R02

R01

Saving

Material

Risks

Documents

R21

R03

R20

R04

Access

Intangible

R19

R05

Sources

Architecture

R18

R06

ORION
22:22

R17

R07

Copies/Media

Nature

R16

R08

Value

Science

R15

R09

Security

Technology

R13

R11

R14

R10

22 registers form not 22 isolated bases, but one graph of related entities.

Rights

Events

R12

Provenance

Digital

Collections

Registers are combined in 6 functional contours

This simplifies navigation and scaling of the classifier

SUBJECTS

OBJECTS

KNOWLEDGE

R01–R02

R03–R07

R08–R12

People, organizations, institutions

Material, intangible, territory, nature

Science, technology, digital heritage, events, collections

LEGAL AND ORIGIN

STATE AND EVALUATION

GOVERNANCE

R13–R14

R15–R18

R19–R22

Rights, Attribution, Ownership Chains

Security, value, copies, sources

Access, risks, conservation measures, communications

Digital passport of the registry record

Minimum Machine Readable Field Set

Unique identifier

Obligation.

Place of Origin / Storage

by car.

PLACE

The canonical name

Obligation.

Sources and references

Obligation for facts

NAME

SOURCE

Variants of names

Opt.

Rights and treatment

by class

ALIASES

RIGHTS

Object type

Obligation.

Recording Status

Obligation.

TYPE

STATUS

Codes R01-R22

Obligation.

Version and change log

Obligation.

REGISTRY

VERSION

Date / Period

by car.

DATE

Principle: the object is not duplicated when included in different registers - its passport and the link graph are expanded.

Controlled dictionaries V01-V08

Normalization of terms for man and machine

Object type

Authenticity

V01

V02

Manuscript • coin • building • PO • collection

confirmed • probable • disputed • copy

State

Significance

V03

V04

Stable • Vulnerable • Emergency • Lost

Local • National • World • Unique

Access

Digitalization

V05

V06

Open • Research • Limited

card • photos • scan • 3D • digital twin

Risk

Type of communication

V07

V08

low • moderate • high • critical

Author • Owner • Place • Event • Collection

Parsing Smart Portal

Register conveyor: from source to verified record

URL • file • PDF • API • Image • Audio • video

Unified ID • passport • registry codes • sources • graph links

P01

P02

P03

P04

P05

P06

P07

P08

P09

P10

Appointments

Extract

Normalization

Essence

Classification

Comparison

Evidence

Verification

Recording

Binding

AI retrieves and offers; the registry stores the origin of the data; the expert confirms the critical fields.

Cross-classification

One object can simultaneously belong to many registers

AN ANCIENT HANDBOOK

R04

R12

R14

R15

R16

R17

R18

R19

R20

R21

R22

11 Links

SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENT

R03

R08

R09

R12

R14

R15

R16

R17

R18

R22

10 Links

CLAD / ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX

R03

R06

R11

R12

R13

R14

R15

R16

R17

R18

R19

R20

R21

14 Links

Multiple membership does not create copies of an object; it creates context.

Evidence and Confidence Index

Fact is separated from hypothesis at the level of each attribute

C = w₁S + w₂I + w₃A + w₄X

S — source quality • I — independence of confirmations
A — attribution consistency • X — expert verification

0–0,39

0,40–0,59

0,60–0,79

0,80–0,94

0,95–1,00

Hypothesis

Preliminary

enough

High

Verified

The critical principle: machine confidence should not be disguised as legal or expert verification.

Hierarchy of registers

From Family Foundation to Planetary Metaregister

PLANETARY

World importance, universal and interstate registers

NATIONAL

State Registers

REGIONAL

subjects, territories, historical and cultural zones

LOCAL

museums, archives, communities, organizations

PERSONAL

Family and private archives

MACHINE METARESTER

index EQUILIBRIUM without assigning the rights of the primary register

ORION 22:22

Symbolic Data Harmonization Circuit

22 REESTRA

22 COMMUNICATIONS

SAVE

CONTACT US

22:22

Entry to the Archive

access to the knowledge system

Meaningful formula: 22 Registry × 2 Directions = "Save ↔ Linking

Symbolic code does not replace DOI, ISBN, archive ciphers, cadastral and other legally significant identifiers.

Implementation of the classifier

Ten Steps from Concept to Working Archive

R01–R22

V01–V08

PASSPORT

CROSSWALK

PARSING

approve the top classifier

Create controlled dictionaries

fix the required fields

Compare external identifiers

rules of extraction and normalization

EVIDENCE

GRAPH

EXPERT

VERSION

PORTAL

Journal of Evidence

Deduplication and communication

the Controversial Records

Change control and hashes

Unified Archive Interface

The result: a searchable, evidence-based and related Heritage preservation environment — suitable for humans and AI.

Result architecture

EQUILIBRIUM transforms an archive from a repository to a system of related knowledge

SOURCES

URL • Funds • catalogs • Base • Media

SMART PARSING

extraction • normalization • comparison

REGISTERS R01-R22

Single Classifier and Dictionaries

DIGITAL PASSPORT

ID • Proof • Right • Version

HERITAGE GRAF

object ↔ person ↔ place ↔ event ↔ source

HERITAGE PRESERVATION ARCHIVE

search • study • saving • generation link

ORION 22:22

Other published edition: Slovar_klassifikator_EQ_ORION_2222.pdf · web text +

EQUILIBRIUM

Heritage Preservation Archive

22:22

ORION22:22 • Parsing Smart Portal

Unified register language for a person, archive,

Search Engine and AI Version 1.0

One object - many registers - one digital passport 02

Basic principle of architecture

R14

Proven Ans

SINGLE DIGITAL PASSPORT

R17

R03 digital

object id steady id copy

CLASS object type and domain

OBJECT

NATURAL

REGISTER multiple membership R01-R22

DIA

SOURCE

Evidence and origin of data

R18

R22

Rights regimes of ownership and use of the connection arable land

Version history of changes and integrity control

EQ-HER-R04-R12-R14-000001-REV03

R13

Law

22 Basic Registry R01–R22 03

Links Institutions

Persona

Canonical Upper Classifier Tree R22 R02

Saving R01 Material

Risks Documents

R21 R03

R20 R04

Intangible

Access

R19 R05

Sources R18 R06Architecture

ORION

22:22

R17 R07

Copies/Media Nature

R16 R08

Value Science

R15 R09

Preservation of Technology

R13 R11

R14 R10

22 registers form not 22 isolated bases, but one graph of related entities.

Provenance Rights R12 Events Digital

Registers are combined in 6 Functional contours 04

This simplifies navigation and scaling of the classifier

R01– R03– R08–

SUBJECTS OBJECTS KNOWLEDGE

R02 R07 R12

Material, intangible, Science, technology, digital

People, organizations, institutions

territory, nature heritage, events, collections

LEGAL AND STATUS AND

R13– R15– R19–

GOVERNANCE

R14 ORIGIN R18 PROOF R22

Security, value, copies, access, risks, conservation measures,

Rights, Attribution, Ownership Chains

Sources of communication

Digital passport of registry record 05

Minimum Machine Readable Field Set

Place of Origin /

ID Unique ID oblig. PLACE by cart.

Storage obligation. for NAME Canonical name of duty. SOURCE Sources and references of facts ALIASES Variants of the names of the opt. RIGHTS Rights and treatment by class TYPE Object Type Obligation. STATUS Status of the recording obligation.

REGISTRY Codes R01-R22 obligatory VERSION version and log changes obligatory.

DATE Date / period by rev.

Principle: the object is not duplicated when included in different registers - its passport and the link graph are expanded.

Controlled dictionaries V01-V08 06

Normalization of terms for man and machine

V01 Object type V02 Authenticity

manuscript • Coin • Construction • Software • Collection confirmed • probably • Controversial • Copy

V03 Condition V04 Value

Stable • Vulnerable • Emergency • Lost Local • National • World • Unique

V05 Access V06 Digitalization

Open • Research • Limited Card • photo • Scan • 3D • Digital Double

V07 Risk V08 Type of communication

Low • Moderate • High • critical author • Owner • Place • Event • Collection

Smart Parsing Portal 07

Register conveyor: from source to verified record

URL • file • PDF • API • Image • Audio • Video Single ID • Passport • Registry Codes • Sources • graph links

P01 P02 P03 P04 P05 P06 P07 P08 P09 P10

Retrieved Normals Essence Classif Comparing Proof Verifik Link

Reception Recording

I.e., and I.e.,

AI retrieves and offers; registry stores origin of data; expert confirms

critical fields.

Cross classification 08

One object can simultaneously belong to many registers

AN ANCIENT HANDBOOK R04 R12 R14 R15 R16 R17 R18 R19 R20 R21 R22

11 Links

SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENT R03 R08 R09 R12 R14 R15 R16 R17 R18 R22

10 Links

CLAD / ARCHAEOLOGICAL

R03 R06 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 R17 R18 R19 R20 R21

COMPLEX

14 Multiple membership does not create copies of an object; it creates context.

Proof and confidence index 09

Fact is separated from hypothesis at the level of each attribute

C = w₁S + w₂I + w₃A + w₄X

C0 C1 C2 C3 C4

S — source quality • I — independence of confirmations

A — attribution consistency • X — expert

Verification 0,40– 0,60– 0,80– 0,95– 0–0,39 0,59 0,79 0,94 1,00 sufficient verifits hypothesis is highly and highly

Critical principle: machine confidence should not be disguised as legal or

expert verification.

Hierarchy of registers 10

From Family Foundation to Planetary Metaregister

A PLANETARY WORLD IMPORTANT, UNIVERSAL AND INTER-STATE REGISTERS

B NATIONAL State Registers

C REGIONAL subjects, territories, historical and cultural zones

D LOCAL museums, archives, communities, organizations

E PERSONAL family and private archives

index

MACHINE EQUILIBRIUM without

METARESTR of assignment of rights

Primary Registry

ORION22:22 11

Symbolic Data Harmonization Circuit

22 REESTRA 22 COMMUNICATIONS

SAVE TO CONTACT

22:22 log in Archive log in knowledge system

Meaningful formula: 22 Registry × 2 Directions = "Save ↔ Linking

Symbolic code does not replace DOI, ISBN, archive ciphers, cadastral and other legally significant identifiers.

Implementation of the classifier 12

Ten Steps from Concept to Working Archive

01 R01–R22 02 V01–V08 03 PASSPORT CROSSWALK 05 PARSING

create an upper set to match the external extraction rules and the controlled classifier mandatory fields of dictionary normalization identifiers

06 EVIDENCE 07 GRAPH 08 EXPERT 09 VERSION 10 PORTAL

log queue controversial change control and single interface deduplication and link evidentiary records hashes Archive Result: Search, Evidence and Related Heritage Preservation Environment - human-friendly and AI.

Result Architecture 13

EQUILIBRIUM transforms an archive from a repository to a system of related knowledge

SOURCES URL • Funds • catalogs • Base • Media

SMART PARSING extraction • normalization • matching

REGISTERS R01-R22 single classifier and dictionaries

DIGITAL PASSPORT ID • Proof • Right • Version

GRAF HERITAGE object ↔ person ↔ place ↔ event ↔ source

search • study • save • link

HERITAGE PRESERVATION ARCHIVE

Generations

ORION 22:22

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

Social Capital and Institutional Design

Source Status: Primary Document

Concept for IAC "EQUILIBRIUM"

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/iats-ekvilibrium-sotsialnyi-kapital

Open on the site

Strategic architecture of trust, cooperation,

Sustainability and Quality of Government Decisions

1. Introduction

The modern state is sustainable not only thanks to the territory, resources, finances, infrastructure, armed forces and the regulatory system. One of the key factors of its viability is social capital - a set of trust, stable ties, the ability to cooperate, social solidarity and the legitimacy of institutions.

With the economy becoming more complex, technological changes accelerating and the number of interrelated risks increasing, traditional administrative mechanisms are becoming insufficient. The state needs a system that can not only react to events, but also design the institutional environment in advance, identify systemic contradictions, predict the consequences of decisions and maintain a balance between the interests of the state, society, the economy and the person.

This function can be performed by the Information and Analytical Center "EQUILIBRIUM". Its task is to move from administrative support of decisions to institutional engineering of the state.

2. Social capital as a strategic resource

Social capital is a set of intangible ties through which society and the state are able to act in concert.

The main elements of social capital include:

  • citizens’ trust in state institutions;
  • trust between citizens and social groups;
  • the ability to horizontal and vertical cooperation;
  • Predictability of institutions;
  • Reputation of state bodies;
  • sustainability of social agreements;
  • the existence of mechanisms for the participation of citizens;
  • Level of social responsibility;
  • the quality of interaction between business, the state and society;
  • The willingness of the parties to the system to fulfill their mutual obligations.

Social capital should be treated on a par with financial, human, industrial and natural capital.

3. Formula of a sustainable state

Sustainability of the state can be represented as a relationship of several basic components:

Institutions × Trust × Competence × Cooperation × Responsibility × Technologies

while reducing: Conflict + Corruption + Information Asymmetry + Bureaucratic entropy + Loss of trust.

In this model, social capital becomes the efficiency factor of the entire state system. Even strong institutions lose effectiveness in the absence of trust. Conversely, a high level of trust significantly reduces transaction costs and increases the ability of society to mobilize and self-organize.

4. Institutional design

Institutional design is a systematic activity to create, modernize and harmonize institutions that regulate the interaction of the state, society, business and citizens.

Design should be:

  • rules and powers;
  • processes and responsibilities;
  • information flows;
  • control and feedback mechanisms;
  • incentives and restrictions;
  • methods of conflict resolution;
  • mechanisms of cooperation.

Thus, institutional design is the engineering of the behavior of complex social systems.

5. State as a system of flows

For IAC "EQUILIBRIUM" it is advisable to consider the state as a dynamic system of flows:

1. Information.

2. Financially.

3. Managerial.

4. Legal.

5. Personnel.

6. Technologically.

7. Social.

8. Resourceful.

9. Reputational.

10. Flows of responsibility.

Violation of any of these flows leads to the accumulation of systemic dysfunction. The IAC must identify such violations before they become a crisis.

6. Role of IAC "EQUILIBRIUM"

The IAC is formed not as an additional administrative body, but as a supra-departmental analytical and project outline.

  • strategic analysis;
  • legal expertise;
  • forecasting;
  • Inter-agency coordination;
  • institutional modeling;
  • assessment of the consequences of state decisions;
  • monitoring of social sustainability;
  • analysis of trust;
  • risk modeling;
  • Development of institutional reforms.

The IAC should provide the state with an answer not only to the question “Does the decision comply with the legislation?”, but also to questions about the consequences, sustainability, changes in trust, new risks and the impact on the long-term development of the country.

7. Social capital contour

Within the IAC, it is proposed to create a specialized outline of social capital.

  • monitoring of public trust;
  • Analysis of social tension;
  • Identifying crises of legitimacy;
  • study of social networks of interaction;
  • Assessment of horizontal cooperation quality;
  • Measurement of social solidarity;
  • Analysis of collective action mechanisms.

The outline should form a regular map of the state of social capital of Russia.

8. National Social Capital Index

8.1. Trust

  • Trust in public institutions;
  • confidence in the judicial system;
  • Trust in municipal authorities;
  • confidence in business;
  • Interpersonal trust.

8.2. Cooperation

  • participation of citizens in public initiatives;
  • development of cooperatives;
  • volunteering;
  • number of joint projects;
  • Inter-agency cooperation.

8.3. Institutional effectiveness

  • speed of decision-making;
  • quality of performance;
  • number of administrative barriers;
  • Number of duplicate functions.

8.4. Level of conflict

  • social conflicts;
  • labor disputes;
  • Inter-agency conflicts;
  • regional tensions.

8.5. Responsibility

  • transparency of decisions;
  • Compliance with obligations;
  • feedback mechanisms;
  • Effectiveness of public control.

9. Methodology for assessing the effectiveness of IAC

9.1. Purpose of the evaluation system

The system for assessing the effectiveness of the IAC should measure not the number of documents prepared, but the real impact of the center on the quality of state decisions, the level of trust, the ability of institutions to cooperate and the stability of the public-state system.

resources → analytical product → use solution → institutional effect → social result

It is necessary to separate the performance indicators of the IAC, the quality of analytical products, the use of recommendations, the systemic effect and external factors.

9.2. Principles of measurement

1. Multilevel: Inputs, processes, products, results, and long-term effects.

2. Comparability is a common methodology for regions, departments and projects.

3. Dynamic analysis is the analysis of absolute values and trends.

4. Verifiability - data source, owner and audit procedure.

5. Separation of fact and assessment.

6. Protection from manipulation.

7. Regional Sensitivity.

8. Result-oriented.

9. independent verification.

10. Ethical and legal admissibility.

9.3. Basic level system

The scale 0–100 is used for all integral indices. It is recommended to consider the base period as the first 12 months of operation of the measurement system.

RangeInterpretation
0–39critical level
40–59Vulnerable level
60–74acceptable level
75–84high level
85–100sustainable level

9.4. KPI trust

Institutional Confidence Index

Definition: Percentage of respondents expressing confidence in key public institutions, standardized on a single scale.

Sources: Surveys, online panels, citizens’ appeals, independent research.

Periodicity: Quarterly; official value annually.

Threshold levels: <40 Critically; 40–59 Vulnerable; 60–74 Acceptable; 75–84 High; ≥85 sustainable.

Predictability index of institutions

Definition: Evaluation of the stability of rules, sequence of decisions and compliance with stated obligations.

Sources: Surveys of citizens and business, analysis of regulatory changes, terms of fulfillment of obligations, judicial practice.

Periodicity: Quarterly.

Threshold levels: <45 high unpredictability; 45–59 unstable; 60–74 Acceptable; ≥75 High.

Fairness of Decision Index

Definition: Percentage of citizens and organizations who consider decision-making procedures clear, equal and justified.

Sources: Surveys, complaints, appeals, expert assessment, analysis of the distribution of consequences.

Periodicity: 2 once a year; for major reforms before/after.

Threshold levels: <40 Critically; 40–59 Risk of conflict; 60–74 Acceptable; ≥75 High.

Speed of Trust Restoration

Definition: Time to stabilize trust after a crisis event or controversial decision.

Sources: Express surveys, dynamics of appeals, media monitoring, digital feedback.

Periodicity: by event.

Threshold levels: >180 Critical Days; 91–180 Vulnerable; 31–90 Acceptable; ≤30 High.

9.5. KPI

Interdepartmental cooperation index

Comprehensive assessment of compliance with deadlines, completeness of data exchange, conflicts of competence, joint projects and fulfillment of obligations.

Periodicity: Operating indicators monthly; consolidated index quarterly.

Threshold levels: <40 Fragmentation; 40–59 Weak cooperation; 60–74 Acceptable; 75–84 High; ≥85 Systemic.

Percentage of joint decisions executed on time

The proportion of interdepartmental decisions made in time to achieve the result.

Periodicity: Monthly.

Threshold levels: <60% Critically; 60–74% Vulnerable; 75–89% Acceptable; 90–94% High; ≥95% sustainable.

Average time of interagency coordination

Median number of calendar days from the registration of the issue to the agreed position.

Periodicity: Monthly.

Threshold levels: >60 Critical Days; 31–60 Risk; 15–30 Acceptable; ≤14 High.

Data exchange quality index

Completeness, timeliness, compatibility and reliability of interdepartmental data.

Periodicity: Monthly.

Threshold levels: <50 Critically; 50–69 not enough; 70–84 Acceptable; ≥85 High.

Percentage of conflicts of competence resolved prior to escalation

Proportion of conflicts of authority resolved before judicial, public or crisis format.

Periodicity: Quarterly.

Threshold levels: <50% Critically; 50–69% Vulnerable; 70–84% Acceptable; ≥85% High.

9.6. KPI

Institutional Sustainability Index

Ability to maintain key functions during external and internal shocks.

Frequency: Quarterly; stress test at least 1 times a year.

Threshold levels: <40 Critically; 40–59 Vulnerable; 60–74 Acceptable; 75–84 High; ≥85 Systemic.

Time to restore critical functions

Average recovery time of key function after failure.

Frequency: By incident; summary quarterly.

Threshold levels: >72 Critically; 25–72 h risk; 8–24 h is acceptable; ≤8 h high.

Social Tension Index

Aggregated assessment of conflict, labor disputes, appeals and signs of instability.

Periodicity: Monthly; in crises weekly.

Threshold levels: 0–24 Low; 25–49 Moderately; 50–69 Elevated; 70–84 High; 85–100 Critically.

Percentage of risks identified with a prepared response scenario

The share of high and critical risks for which there is a proven scenario and responsible.

Periodicity: Quarterly.

Threshold levels: <60% Critically; 60–79% Vulnerable; 80–94% Acceptable; ≥95% High.

Regional Balance Index

The degree of uniformity of trust, cooperation and sustainability between regions and social groups.

Periodicity: Annually; critical deviations quarterly.

Threshold levels: >30 p.p. critical gap; 20–30 Risk; 10–19 Acceptable; <10 High.

9.7. KPI Quality Solutions

  • The proportion of significant decisions that have passed institutional examination.
  • The index of the completeness of the institutional passport.
  • Accuracy of forecasts.
  • Share of IAC recommendations taken into account in final decisions.
  • Percentage of decisions adjusted prior to implementation.
  • Percentage of decisions without significant post-facto adjustment.
  • Index of public understanding of decisions.

9.8. KPI Direct Efficiency IAC

  • Compliance with the deadlines for the preparation of analytical products.
  • The proportion of analytical products that have passed internal quality control.
  • Proportion of products, indicating sources, assumptions and constraints.
  • Average assessment of customers.
  • The share of projects with post-facto evaluation.

9.9. Combined IAC Performance Index

Recommended weight structure:

  • quality of solutions — 30%;
  • trust and legitimacy — 20%;
  • interdepartmental cooperation - 20%;
  • institutional sustainability — 15%;
  • quality of analytical products — 10%;
  • institutional learning and memory — 5%.

SIE IAC = 0,30Q + 0,20D + 0,20K + 0,15U + 0,10A + 0,05M

If any key index is below 40 points, the overall result cannot be considered sustainable regardless of the aggregate value.

9.10. Data sources

Administrative data
  • State information systems
  • electronic document management
  • Registers of decisions
  • Statistics of performance
  • Supervisory authorities
  • Judicial statistics
  • citizens' appeals
Sociological data
  • representative surveys
  • Panel studies
  • Business Surveys
  • Surveys of civil servants
  • Focus Groups
  • expert interviews
Digital Data
  • Anonymized Platform Statistics
  • terms of processing requests
  • Interagency Exchange Journals
  • Aggregate data of public services
  • monitoring of information flows
Expert data
  • independent expert commissions
  • Professional Associations
  • Scientific organizations
  • Public Councils
  • international comparisons

9.11. Periodicity of measurements

Daily / close to real time
  • Critical Incidents
  • Failures of systems
  • Sudden changes in social tension
Monthly
  • Terms of approvals
  • Enforcement of decisions
  • Quality of data exchange
  • Operational indicators of sustainability
Quarterly
  • Trust
  • Co-operation
  • quality of solutions
  • accuracy of short-term forecasts
  • Conflicts of Competence
Annually
  • National Social Capital Index
  • Combined IAC Performance Index
  • Regional balance
  • External audit of methodology

9.12. Management response system

ZoneStateActions
GreenTarget/High LevelContinuation of policy, dissemination of practices, planned reporting
Yellow5–10% reduction or vulnerable rangecorrective plan, analysis of causes, re-measurement
Orange>10% reduction or critical thresholdinteragency group, stress test, program review, report
KrasnayaSystemic crisiscrisis monitoring, independent verification, response scenarios, suspension of risky decisions

10. The Institutional Digital Double

One of the promising elements of the IAC should be a digital twin of the state system, which allows modeling reforms, taxes, social payments, megaprojects, sanctions and technological restrictions, demographic changes.

  • accuracy of forecasts;
  • the proportion of solutions that have been modelled;
  • the number of identified risks;
  • time of preparation of scenarios;
  • quality of data;
  • The percentage of models that have undergone independent validation.

11. Institutional review of decisions

1. Constitutionality.

2. Legality.

3. Economic efficiency.

4. Social consequences.

5. Impact on trust.

6. National security.

7. technological sovereignty.

8. Regional sustainability.

9. Environmental impacts.

10. International consequences.

11. Corruption risks.

12. Administrative costs.

13. Long-term sustainability.

The result is an institutional passport of decision.

12. Interdepartmental arbitration

The IAC can serve as an intellectual arbitrage between state institutions, not replacing courts, but preventing institutional conflicts before they enter the open phase.

  • identification of duplicate powers;
  • detection of regulatory contradictions;
  • Analysis of conflicts of interest;
  • preparation of solutions;
  • modeling of consequences;
  • search for compromise mechanisms.

13. Architecture IAC

Block 1. Strategic analysis

Analysis of global and national processes.

Block 2. Legal expertise

Constitutional, regulatory and institutional review.

Block 3. Social capital

Monitoring of trust and social sustainability.

Block 4. Institutional design

Creation and modernization of institutions.

Block 5. Economic modeling

Assessment of financial and economic implications.

Block 6. Technological analysis

AI, industry and technological sovereignty.

Block 7. National security

Integrated threat assessment.

Block 8. International analysis

The global institutional environment and international law.

Block 9. Forecasting

Foresight and Scenario Modeling.

Block 10. Digital platform "EQUILIBRIUM"

A single analytical space.

14. Artificial Intelligence

AI should be a tool of analysts, not an autonomous source of government decisions.

  • processing of large amounts of data;
  • detection of anomalies;
  • search for hidden relationships;
  • creation of scenarios;
  • analysis of regulatory documents;
  • assessment of systemic risks;
  • modeling of solutions.

Critical conclusions should be subject to expert verification, and the final decisions should be left to the individual and established state institutions.

15. The Contour of Trust

  • Increased social tension;
  • Reduced trust in institutions;
  • feeling of injustice;
  • deterioration of communication between authorities and society;
  • Increased administrative distance.

Based on the analysis, recommendations for restoring trust are formed.

16. Contour of cooperation

  • speed of interagency interaction;
  • Number of joint programmes;
  • quality of data exchange;
  • number of conflicts of competence;
  • Duration of approvals;
  • Number of duplicate functions.

17. Institutional memory of the state

The IAC should form a single repository of institutional experience: reforms, programs, causes of success and failure, crises, emergencies, and international experience.

The goal is to prevent the recurrence of previous system errors.

18. The principle of independent analytics

The accuracy of the analysis is higher than the administrative convenience.

The IAC should be able to provide the country’s leadership with an objective assessment even when the findings do not coincide with the expectations of individual departments.

19. Communication with the system "EQUILIBRIUM"

surveillance → Data → analysis → forecast → Expertise → Modeling → solution → execution → control → feedback

Thus, the IAC is transforming from an analytical institution into an ongoing system of institutional development.

20. Relationship with ECO-PPA and SFERA

  • EQUILIBRIUM - Observation, analytics and forecasting.
  • IAC - Strategic expertise and institutional design.
  • SFERA — space of initiatives and public cooperation.
  • ECO-PPA is a mechanism for mobilizing public and private resources.
  • SPECZASHCHITA is a cooperative executive circuit.

threat or problem → analysis → Draft institutional decision → Resource mobilization → execution → measurement of the result → adjustment

21. The concept of institutional constructor

The digital "Institutional Designer" should translate the formulated task into a ready-made model of the institute.

  • necessary institutions;
  • participants;
  • authority;
  • regulatory framework;
  • Sources of funding;
  • mechanism of responsibility;
  • performance indicators;
  • risks;
  • digital infrastructure.

22. The main principle

The future of public administration is not to increase the number of government bodies, but to improve the quality of their interaction.

The IAC should design not a new bureaucracy, but a new architecture of connectivity.

23. Final model

IAC "EQUILIBRIUM" can become a center of strategic thinking, institutional design and accumulation of social capital of the state.

Its ultimate goal is to create a sustainable state in which law, economy, technology, society, institutions and strategic management act as a coherent system.

Strong State = strong institutions + high social capital + high quality cooperation + long-term strategic thinking + measurable efficiency.

Other published edition: SOCIAL CAPITAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN Concept for IAC "EQUILIBRIUM" IAC_EQUILIBRIUM_Social_capital_institutional_design_extended_presentation.pptx · web text +

From administrative support to institutional engineering of the state

1. Social capital is a strategic resource

Trust

Predictability of institutions, compliance, fairness of procedures.

Cooperation

The ability of the state, society and business to act together.

Legality

Recognition of decisions as reasonable, understandable and deserving of compliance.

Responsibility

Personal and institutional responsibility for the outcome.

Connectivity

The quality of horizontal and vertical connections in the system.

2. Formula of a sustainable state

Institutions × Trust × Competence × Cooperation × Responsibility × Technologies

Social capital is the efficiency factor of the entire system.

Decrease: conflict + corruption + information asymmetry + bureaucratic entropy + loss of trust

Increased trust reduces transaction costs and increases the ability of society to mobilize and self-organize.

3. Institutional design

Not only organizations are designed, but also rules, powers, processes, and responsibilities.

The design includes information flows, control, feedback, incentives, restrictions and mechanisms of cooperation.

Institutional design is the engineering of the behavior of complex social systems.

The goal of the IAC is to create a sustainable interaction architecture, not an additional layer of bureaucracy.

4. State as a system of flows

Information

Finance

Management

Right

Workforce

Technology

Social relations

Resources

Reputation

Responsibility

IAC function

Identify gaps and dysfunctions in flows before they become a systemic crisis.

5. Role of IAC "EQUILIBRIUM"

Strategic analysis

Trends, threats, long-term consequences

Legal expertise

Constitutionality, legality, regulatory risks

Forecasting

Scenarios and uncertainty assessment

Inter-agency coordination

Reconciliation and conflict resolution

Institutional Modeling

Design of rules and mechanisms

Monitoring of trust

Social Sustainability and Legitimacy

6. Social capital contour

Monitoring

Diagnostics

Forecast

Recommendations

Adjustment

Public trust • social tensions • crises of legitimacy

Horizontal cooperation • social solidarity • quality of social relations

The result is a regular map of the state of social capital of Russia

7. National Social Capital Index

Trust

Institutions • courts • municipal level • business • interpersonal trust

Cooperation

Initiatives • cooperatives • volunteering • joint projects

Efficiency

Speed of solutions • execution • administrative barriers

Conflict

Social • labor • interdepartmental • regional conflicts

Responsibility

Transparency • obligations • feedback • public control

8. Methodology for assessing the effectiveness of IAC

Resources

Analytical product

Use

Institutional effect

Public result

We measure the impact, not the number of documents prepared.

We distinguish direct KPI IAC activities and external factors.

Each indicator has a data source, owner, frequency, base and response threshold.

9. Base index scale 0–100

0–39

Critical

40–59

Vulnerable

60–74

Acceptable

75–84

High

85–100

Steady

The baseline period is the first 12 months of observations; historical series are used in data comparability.

The threshold values shall be specified after accumulation of at least two years of comparable measurements.

10. KPI trust

KPISourcePeriodicityThreshold / landmark
Institutional Confidence IndexSurveys, panels, appealsQuarterly<40 Critically; ≥75 High
Predictability of InstitutionsSurveys + regulatory dynamicsQuarterly<45 Risk; ≥75 High
Fairness of decisionsPolls, complaints, appeals2 times/year<40 Critically; ≥75 High
Speed of Trust RestorationExpress surveys, digital feedbackEvent-based>180 Critical Days; ≤30 High

11. KPI

KPISourcePeriodicityThreshold / landmark
Interdepartmental cooperationEDI, protocols, surveysQuarterly<40 Fragmentation; ≥85 Systemic
Decisions executed on timeGIS, control cardsMonthly<60% Critically; ≥95% sustainable
Timing of approvalEDO, magazinesMonthly>60 Critical Days; ≤14 High
Data exchange qualityLogs, IP auditsMonthly<50 Critically; ≥85 High

12. KPI

KPISourcePeriodicityThreshold / landmark
Institutional sustainabilityStress tests, continuity plansQuarterly<40 critical; ≥85 systemically
Recovery time of functionsIncident logsBy incident>72 Critically; ≤8 h high
Social tensionStatistics, surveys, appealsMonthly70–84 high; 85–100 critical
Risks with a response scenarioRisk register, exercisesQuarterly<60% Critically; ≥95% High

13. KPI Quality Government Decisions

Expertise coverage

Percentage of significant decisions with an institutional passport

Completeness of passport

Verified data, scripts, KPI and responsible

Accuracy of forecasts

Deviation of forecast from actual result

Consideration of recommendations

Percentage of recommendations reflected in final decisions

Preliminary correction

Percentage of risks eliminated before implementation

Clarity of decision

The ability of citizens and organizations to understand the goals and consequences

14. KPI Direct Efficiency IAC

Meeting the deadlines of analytical products: target level ≥95%.

Internal quality control: target level ≥95%.

Sources, assumptions and constraints disclosed: target level ≥95%.

Average rating of customers: high level ≥4,5 from 5.

Post-factum evaluation of completed projects: high level ≥90%.

15. Combined IAC Performance Index

Formula

SIE = 0,30Q + 0,20D + 0,20K + 0,15U + 0,10A + 0,05M

Protective rule

If any key index <40, system is not considered stable regardless of the total score.

16. Data sources

Administrative

GIS • EDO • registers • court statistics • appeals

Sociological

Surveys • Panels • Business • Employees • Focus Groups

Digital

Logs • services • platforms • aggregates

Expert

Science • Associations • Councils • Independent Commissions

Post-factum

Actual results • audit • deadlines • costs • consequences

17. Periodicity of measurements

Real-time

Incidents, failures, sensitive treatment

Monthly

Harmonization, execution, data exchange

Quarterly

Trust, cooperation, quality of solutions

2 times/year

Fairness, understanding of reforms

Annually

National index, audit, goals

18. Data quality contour

Passport KPI

Source

Formula

Audit

Versions

Publication

Each KPI has an owner, base, target, critical threshold and date of last verification.

Changes in methodology are recorded and disclosed.

Selective primary data audits and independent peer review are mandatory for key indicators.

19. Management response system

Green

Goal achieved Continuation of policy • replication practices

Yellow

Decline 5–10% Corrective plan • re-measurement

Orange

Decline >10% Working Group • stress test • Revision of the program

Krasnaya

Systemic crisis Crisis monitoring • independent verification • Response scenarios

20. The Institutional Digital Double

Modeling of taxes, reforms, new laws, social payments and infrastructure megaprojects.

Scenarios of sanctions, technological constraints and demographic changes.

At least 70% major reforms should have scenario modeling.

At least 80% significant models must undergo independent validation.

All critical assumptions are disclosed in the passport model.

21. Institutional Passport Solutions

Constitutionality

Legality

Economy

Social consequences

Trust

Security

Technological Sovereignty

Regional sustainability

Ecology

International implications

Corruption risks

Administrative costs

Long-term sustainability

22. Interdepartmental arbitration

Disagreement

Diagnostics

Options

Modelling

Harmonization

Enforcement control

The task is to prevent institutional conflicts before judicial, public or crisis escalation.

KPI: time of settlement, the proportion of disputes before escalation, the implementation of agreements, the recurrence of conflicts.

23. IAC architecture — 10 blocks

Strategic analysis

Legal expertise

Social capital

Institutional design

Economic modeling

Technological analysis

National security

International analysis

Forecasting

Digital platform

24. Artificial Intelligence as an Analytics Tool

Functions AI

Big data • anomalies • hidden relationships • scenarios • regulatory analysis • risk model

Red Lines

100% Critical findings are subject to expert review. 100% Decisions are made by a responsible person. An opaque model cannot be the only basis for a decision affecting the rights of citizens.

25. Institutional memory of the state

A single repository of reforms, government programs, successes, failures, crises and international experience.

≥90% large projects are checked on the basis of similar solutions.

≥80% Completed projects have a post-facto evaluation.

Repeating a previously recorded error should be reduced by at least 10% per year.

26. Independent analytics

Principle

The accuracy of the analysis is higher than the administrative convenience.

100% significant changes in the analytical document are recorded in the version log.

100% critical conclusions have an independent reviewer.

Unlisted recommendations are accompanied by a documented explanation.

Annual external audit — at least 20% significant analytical products.

27. Unified ecosystem of execution

EQUILIBRIUM

Watching • data • analytics • forecast

IAC

Examination • institutional design

SFERA

Initiatives • Public cooperation

ECO-PPA

Mobilization of public and private resources

SPECZASHCHITA

Cooperative Executive Outline

28. End-to-end control cycle

Threat / Problem

Analysis

Institutional solution

Resources

Implementation

Measurement

Adjustment

Key result

Closed loop from problem identification to measurable result and system learning.

29. Institutional constructor

At the entrance is a task or a threat.

The system determines the institutions, participants, powers, regulatory framework and sources of funding.

Forms responsibility, risks, KPI, base and target values.

Minimum standard: ≥3 script, ≥2 alternative implementation mechanisms, stop and adjust criteria.

The output is a ready-made institutional model for launching and subsequent audit.

IAC "EQUILIBRIUM" Center for Strategic Thinking, Institutional Design and Accumulation of Social Capital

A strong state

strong institutions + high social capital + quality cooperation + long-term strategic thinking + measurable efficiency

Published files

SFERA · Full published text

SFERA. A World Without Borders

Source Status: Primary Document

The concept of a global ecosystem of cooperation, initiatives and joint development

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/sfera-mir-bez-granits

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM • SFERA • A WORLD WITHOUT BORDERS

1. Summary

SFERA - A world without borders is a global ecosystem of interaction in which people, communities, cities, states, research centers, enterprises, development institutions and international organizations can combine initiatives, knowledge, technologies, resources and competencies to solve common problems.

SFERA does not eliminate differences between countries, cultures and institutions. It creates a space of cooperation over them - an environment where borders cease to be an obstacle to the exchange of knowledge, creative activity and joint development.

The basic formula of the project:

  • EQUILIBRIUM - The mind and architecture of the system.
  • SFERA is a space of interaction and implementation.
  • A world without borders is a civilizational mission and an image of the future.

2. Mission

The mission of SFERA is to create an accessible global collaboration space in which an individual or organization can go from an idea to a proven socially useful result.

The key principle is not competition with everyone, but cooperation around tasks, where the overall result creates value for each participant.

3. The image of the future

SFERA forms a model of the world in which knowledge is freely connected with practice, initiatives get a clear development path, technologies work for people and nature, and international interaction is built around specific creative projects.

A world without boundaries in this model means:

  • without barriers to knowledge and education;
  • without artificial gaps between science, business, the state and society;
  • without technological isolation where safe cooperation is possible;
  • without limiting the creative initiative geography;
  • without contrasting economic development with environmental and social development;
  • with respect for cultural, national and civilizational identity.

4. Architecture SFERA

4.1. Core

Core SFERA is a digital and organizational environment that brings together participants, initiatives, projects, resources, knowledge, standards, expertise and results.

4.2. Contours

Initiatives are the collection, structuring, and routing of ideas and proposals.

Examination - verification of scientific, social, economic, environmental and technological viability.

Cooperation is the formation of teams, consortia, production and public relations.

Resource provision - financing, infrastructure, technologies, data, competencies and partners.

Piloting is the implementation of a limited-scale confirming project.

Validation of the result is the measurement of the actual effect and confirmation of the declared indicators.

Scaling is the replication of working solutions between territories, industries and countries.

5. Mechanics of the Initiative Movement

Universal route SFERA:

Initiative → Expertise → Co-operation → resource support → Pilot → Confirmed result → Scaling

This sequence allows you to turn SFERA from an information portal into an action infrastructure. The user should not only learn about the project, but also understand how to join it, what needs to be done and what result is considered successful.

6. Main directions

  • Human and personality development
  • Education and knowledge
  • Science and research
  • Technology and industry
  • Ecology and restoration of natural systems
  • Health and quality of life
  • Culture and heritage
  • Cities and territories
  • Energy
  • Transport and logistics
  • Agriculture and food
  • Digital technologies and artificial intelligence
  • Entrepreneurship and cooperation
  • Social initiatives
  • Finance for development
  • Public Safety
  • International cooperation
  • Media and Communication
  • The Future of Civilization

7. Participants SFERA

  • citizens and initiative groups;
  • public organizations and foundations;
  • cooperatives and professional communities;
  • universities, academies, research centers;
  • technology companies and industry;
  • small and medium business;
  • Corporations and infrastructure operators;
  • municipalities, regions and state bodies;
  • development institutions and financial institutions;
  • international organizations and cross-border consortia.

8. Digital portal "SFERA - World without borders"

The portal is a user input to the ecosystem. Its task is to combine information, social, project and economic functions.

8.1. Key sections of the portal

  • Map of the world and territories - projects, initiatives, problems, resources and growth points.
  • Catalogue of initiatives — open offers and programs.
  • Projects are projects at stages from idea to scaling.
  • People and teams - competencies, roles and the opportunity to join.
  • Organizations are participants in the ecosystem and their capabilities.
  • Knowledge - research, methods, standards, educational materials.
  • Technology - solutions, developments, technological requests.
  • Resources - financing, equipment, sites, data and infrastructure.
  • Events — forums, project sessions, exhibitions, competitions, public events.
  • Results - confirmed effects, ratings, metrics and implementation history.

9. Communication with EQUILIBRIUM

EQUILIBRIUM sets system architecture, rules of coherence, evaluation models, analytics and balancing mechanisms. SFERA is the public and applied circuit through which participants interact with this architecture.

Thus, EQUILIBRIUM The answer is “how to build a complete system” SFERA — "how people, organizations, and projects come into it and act together".

10. Economics and Resource Model

SFERA should support different forms of resource provision, without reducing development exclusively to classical commercial financing.

  • Grant mechanisms;
  • private investment;
  • public-private partnership;
  • cooperative models;
  • targeted and project financing;
  • social and environmental financial instruments;
  • exchange of resources between participants;
  • Providing technologies, infrastructure and competencies as a contribution to the project.

11. System of trust and validation

An open cooperative environment requires measurable trust. Therefore, in SFERA there should be a contour of confirmation of personality, competencies, organizations, projects, technologies and results.

  • verification of the origin of information;
  • Reputation profile of the participant;
  • expert evaluation;
  • validation of the declared effects;
  • history of participation and fulfillment of obligations;
  • transparent indicators of the project;
  • fixation of social, environmental and economic results.

12. International principle

SFERA is built as a space available for different countries and civilization models. Its international principle is cooperation not on the basis of unification of all participants, but on the basis of compatibility of goals, standards of interaction and mutual benefit.

SFERA can become an infrastructure for international project consortia, knowledge exchange programs, transboundary environmental projects, scientific and technological cooperation and humanitarian initiatives.

13. Principles SFERA

Man at the center. technologies and institutions are considered as means of development of man, society and environment.

Creation. priority is given to initiatives that create measurable value.

Openness: Access to opportunities should be as broad as possible while respecting security and law requirements.

Cooperation. the system helps to find partners, not just competitors.

Proof. the result is confirmed by data and measurable indicators.

Diversity. differences in cultures and development patterns are considered as a resource.

The economic, social, environmental, and technological effects are assessed together.

Scalability: Successful solutions must have a clear replication mechanism.

14. Levels SFERA

  • Personal level - person, competence, development trajectory, participation in initiatives.
  • Project level - team, task, resources, indicators and result.
  • Urban and territorial level - complex programs for the development of the territory.
  • The national level is the cooperation of industries, the state, business and society.
  • International level - cross-border programs and pooling of resources of countries.
  • Planetary level - tasks that have no national borders: climate, ecology, knowledge, space, security of future generations.

15. Strategic positioning

SFERA is not a social network, not a state portal, not a marketplace and not a fund in the traditional sense. It integrates the individual functions of these models into a single collaborative infrastructure.

Key positioning formula:

SFERA — A World Without Borders.
A common space of people, knowledge, initiatives and resources for a common future.

16. First stage of launch

  • To fix brand and architecture "SFERA - World without borders".
  • Create a portal structure and a single directory of directions.
  • Create a pilot register of initiatives and organizations.
  • Launch an initiative mechanism.
  • Create an expert and validation outline.
  • Select the first demonstration projects.
  • Launch a public map of projects and results.
  • Create a partnership model for regions, development institutions and international participants.

17. Result

SFERA - A world without borders is an infrastructure for the transition from disparate initiatives to organized global cooperation. Its value is determined not by the amount of information published, but by the number of initiatives that have gone down to a confirmed result and been scaled up.

In the final model, SFERA becomes a global space where every person, organization, city or country can propose an initiative, find partners, get resources, prove the result and transfer a successful solution to others.

Other published edition: SFERA SFERA_Mir_bez_granits_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

A WORLD WITHOUT BORDERS

Global Ecosystem of Cooperation, Initiatives and Co-Development

PEOPLE

KNOWLEDGE

TECHNOLOGIES

EQUILIBRIUM → SFERA → A WORLD WITHOUT BORDERS

Strategic Concept • 2026

Three levels of one system

From architecture to interaction to civilizational outcome

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

A WORLD WITHOUT BORDERS

Systems architecture, analytics, connectivity rules, evaluation and balancing models.

Answers the question: "how to arrange a complete system?"

Public space of interaction of people, organizations, projects, knowledge and resources.

Answers the question: "How to act together?"

The image of the future: free movement of knowledge, cooperation and decisions with respect for cultural and national identity.

System Mind

Space of action

Goal of development

Mission SFERA

Transform disparate capabilities into collaborative infrastructure

Create an accessible global space in which an individual or organization can walk the path

FROM IDEA

TO PARTNERS

TO RESOURCES

TO THE PILOT

TO THE PROVEN RESULT

TO MASSTABING

Principle: not competition with everyone, but cooperation around tasks, where the overall result creates value for each participant.

What does "world without borders" mean?

Not the rejection of differences, but the removal of barriers to creative interaction

Knowledge

Science + business + state

They move more freely between people, universities, cultures and territories.

They work in a single project outline, not in isolated institutions.

Technology

Economics + ecology

Faster from development to useful implementation.

They are considered as interrelated parts of sustainable development.

Cultures and countries

Person

They retain their identity, but they get a common language of cooperation.

Gets a clear route of participation, development and creation.

Architecture SFERA

Seven interconnected contours turn a portal into an action infrastructure

INITIATIVES

MASSTABING

EXPERTISE

SFERA

digital + organizational environment

VALIDATION

COOPERATION

PILOT

RESOURCES

Universal route of the initiative

Common logic for social, scientific, technological, environmental and entrepreneurial projects

Initiative

Expertise

Cooperation

Resource

security

Pilot

Confirmed

Result

Scaling

not the number of publications, but the number of initiatives that have reached a measurable result and been scaled

Key metric SFERA

19 Directions SFERA

A single map of development - from man and culture to industry and the future of civilization

Person

Education

Science

Technology

Ecology

Health

Culture

Cities

Energy

Transport

Agriculture

AI and figure

Entrepreneurship

Social initiatives

Finance for development

Security

International cooperation

Media

The Future of Civilization

Who is included in SFERA

PEOPLE

The ecosystem unites not the audience, but the participants of the joint result

citizens • initiative groups • experts

WORLD

SOCIETY

international organizations • cross-border consortia

NPO • Funds • Cooperatives • Community

GENERAL

RESULT

DEVELOPMENT

KNOWLEDGE

banks • funds • development institutions • investors

Universities • Academy • Research Centers

TERRITORIES

ECONOMY

municipalities • regions • state bodies

SME • Corporation • Industry • Technology Companies

Digital portal "SFERA - World without borders"

One entry into the ecosystem of projects, knowledge, people, resources and results

World map

Initiatives

Projects

People and teams

Organizations

projects • problems • resources • growth points

filing • search • status • participation

from idea to scaling

Competency • Roles • Partners

Features • Requests • Participation

Knowledge

Technology

Resources

Events

Results

Research • Standards • Training

Solutions • Development • requests

Finance • Infrastructure • Data

forums • sessions • competitions

metrics • ratings • implementations

Trust and Validation

An open environment works only when the origin of the data, competence and results can be confirmed

Identity

Competences

Organization

Project

Technology

Result

Who is participating

what he can

What represents

What promises

What is proved

What really changed

Reputation of participant + expert evaluation + transparent indicators + performance history + effects confirmation

Economics and Resource Model

SFERA Connects finance with non-financial resources - competencies, infrastructure and technology

Grants

Cooperative models

Private investment

Social and eco-tools

RESOURCES

FOR

RESULTS

PPP

Resource exchange

Project financing

Technology and infrastructure as a contribution

Six levels SFERA

One interaction logic scales from personal trajectory to planetary tasks

PERSONAL

person • competence • participation

PROJECT

team • problem • resources • metrics

TERRITORIAL

City • Region • Integrated Programs

NATIONAL

Industry • State • Business • Society

INTERNATIONAL

• Consortiums

PLANETARY

ecology • climate • knowledge • future generations

What SFERA is not - and what it becomes

It combines the functions of familiar digital models, but its core is a joint action and a measurable result.

NOT ONLY

NOT ONLY

NOT ONLY

NOT ONLY

NOT ONLY

Social Network

Gosportal

Marketplace

Fund

Media

SFERA = a single infrastructure where information, trust, cooperation, resources and execution are combined into a single result route

First stage of launch

Eight Steps to Transition from a Concept to a Working Ecosystem

Fix brand and architecture

Create a portal structure

Create a register of initiatives and organizations

Start submitting initiatives

Create an expert and validation outline

Select demonstration projects

Launch a map of projects and results

Connect regions and international partners

SFERA — WORLD WITHOUT BORDERS

A common space of people, knowledge, initiatives and resources for a common future.

Every person, organization, city or country can offer an initiative, find partners, get resources, prove the result and transfer a successful solution to others.

EQUILIBRIUM → SFERA → A WORLD WITHOUT BORDERS

Published files

SFERA · Full published text

SFERA. New Order. Coded Art

Source Status: Primary Document

Coded Art

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/sfera-novyi-uklad-kodirovannoe-iskusstvo

Open on the site

Version 1.0 · 22 August 2026

Prepared for the project outline "City of Knowledge - City of Events"

Contents

• 1. Summary of the concept

• 2. Meaning: what is coded art

• 3. New Order: A Cultural Operating System

• 4. Architecture SFERA

• 5. Code matrix of art

• 6. Events as a Mechanism of a New Order

• 7. Cinema, culture and urban memory

• 8. Registers and reliable data

• 9. User Roles

• 10. Product structure of the portal

• 11. Technological Logic

• 12. Economic model

• 13. Pilot for 90 days

• 14. Performance indicators

• 15. Risks and protection of meaning

• 16. Final Formula

1. Summary of the concept

“SFERA. New Order. Coded Art” is a platform concept that connects art, culture, cinema, events, education, urban memory and digital registers within a single development system.

Coded art is understood here not as a cipher for secrecy’s sake, but as a way to express meaning, value, knowledge and action through cultural forms: a film, an event, an image, a route, an exhibition, a symbol, a digital object or an educational programme.

Purpose of the document

• form semantic and product architecture direction "SFERA". Events";

• describe coded art as a tool for cultural navigation and bringing communities together;

• show how cinema, museums, heritage, educational events and digital registries are integrated into a single system;

• specify the structure MVP and the launch roadmap.

Short formula

2. Meaning: what is coded art

Coded art is art in which image, sound, plot, symbol, space and event serve both aesthetic and navigational functions. It helps a person understand where they are, which culture they belong to, what action is required of them and what role they can play in shared development.

Five levels of code

LevelContentsExample
Meaning CodeIdea, value, ideological supportManifesto, film, exhibition, ritual of memory
Image CodeVisual form, symbol, style, colorIdentity, poster, movie location, hero
Event CodeScenario for putting people into actionFestival, film club, forum, route
Educational codeKnowledge that remains after the eventLecture, course, tutorial, archive
Digital codeData, registries, identifiers, metadataObject card, ISAN, register, link graph

Art in this logic ceases to be only a work. It becomes the interface between man and civilization.

3. New Order: A Cultural Operating System

The New Order is not merely an economic or technological model. It is a way of organising life in which culture, knowledge, events, social participation and digital infrastructure begin to function as a single operating system.

Principles of the New Order

1. Connectivity: No event exists apart from knowledge, place, people, and outcome.

2. Evidence: Cultural objects, films, events and projects rely on verifiable data and registers.

3. Participation: a person is not only a spectator, but a participant, co-author, volunteer, expert, creator of the project.

4. Continuity: Heritage is not conserved, but incorporated into modern life.

5. Mediation: Each event produces content, archive, and next step.

6. Scalability: The city model can be transferred to the region, the country and the international network.

4. Architecture SFERA

SFERA is not a single service. It is a multi-level platform that connects map, billboard, archive, registries, media, education, projects and analytics.

LayerModulePurpose
Layer 1MapCultural objects, sites, routes, film locations, heritage
Layer 2PosterEvents, festivals, shows, lectures, exhibitions, forums
Layer 3KnowledgeMaterials, courses, articles, videos, methods, schools
Layer 4Cinema and artFilms, authors, studios, archives, film clubs, festivals
Layer 5RegistriesState and international databases of reliable data
Layer 6ProjectsExchange of initiatives, partnerships, grants, pilots
Layer 7AnalysisEvent index, cultural activity, reports, forecasts

The Central Formula of Architecture

5. Code matrix of art

For system work, it is necessary not just to collect events, but to encode them in semantic fields. This will allow you to build recommendations, routes, educational programs and analytics.

№CodeMeaningFormats
1MemoryHistory, heritage, archive, continuitymuseum, chronicle, restoration
2A vision of the futureProjects, scenarios, urban visionsforum, design session, futurological film
3PersonBiographies, heroes, personal storiesInterview, documentary cycle
4PlaceTerritory, landscape, architectureroute, cinema location, exhibition
5CommunityClubs, initiatives, volunteersmeeting, film club, project meeting
6CraftSkills, craftsmanship, culture productionmaster class, school, laboratory
7SymbolSign, image, color, myth, identityart object, poster, media image
8ActionEvent, ritual, action, project launchfestival, premiere, city day
9KnowledgeLectures, courses, research, methodsUniversity of the city, open lesson
10ContactPartnership, diplomacy, international exchangeteleconference, days of culture, forum
11EconomyGrants, purchases, patronage, tourismproject exchange, pitching
12Digital footprintMetadata, archive, graph, analyticsevent card, digital passport
13TransformationChange of environment, person, cityFinal project, new tradition

6. Events as a Mechanism of a New Order

The event in SFERA is not a separate date in the calendar, but a production unit of culture. It produces attention, knowledge, media, connections, projects, and memory.

Passport of events

• name, type, date, site and coordinates;

• semantic code and thematic field;

• organizer, partners, speakers, participants;

• related films, museum objects, historical places and routes;

• program, registration, tickets, broadcast;

• media after the event: photos, videos, text, interviews, presentations;

• results: solutions, projects, new meetings, grant applications, archive.

Event funnel

StageWhat's going onTargeted action
I sawPoster, map, selection, recommendationTransfer to event card
Copy that.Description of meaning and useregistration or preservation
He cameOffline / online participationparticipation, mark, feedback
Received knowledgeMaterials after the eventViewing records, downloading materials
Joined the communitySubscribing to a theme, club or organizerPermanent participation
Created a continuationProject, route, film, article, actionA new cycle of events

7. Cinema, culture and urban memory

Cinema in SFERA acts as a memory amplifier and image of the future. Through the film, the city can tell about itself, connect people with the place, show cultural heritage, and create an event around viewing.

Cinemas SFERA

• City Film Club: regular screenings with discussion.

• City as film: a documentary cycle about territory, people and meanings.

• Map of film locations: filming locations and potential venues for new films.

• City Film Festival: a competition of films about the city, heritage and future.

• Film Laboratory: scripts, shorts, documentary projects.

• Memory archive: video stories of residents, masters, veterans, teachers, artists.

8. Registers and reliable data

For SFERA to be a serious platform, it must rely on reliable sources: state and international registers of culture, cinema, heritage, museums, grants, procurement and festivals.

ContourSourcesWhat the platform provides
Cinema RFRegister of rental certificates, national film certificates, Gosfilmofond, Film Fundlegal status of the film, archive, state support
Heritage of RussiaEGROKN, regional registries of OKNobject status, security restrictions, routes
Museums of Russiathe State Catalogue of the Russian Museum Fundobjects, collections, digital expositions
Financing of RFPFCI, Culture. Grants from Russia, EIS procurementgrants, contests, purchases, partners
World HeritageUNESCO World Heritage, UNESCO ICHobjects and traditions of world importance
Museums of PeaceEuropeana, ICOM Red Listscollections, cultural security
Film Archives of the WorldFIAF, European Film Gateway, LUMIERE, ISAN, festival archivesarchive, rental, identifiers, festival fate

Digital object passport

• for film: title, country, year, authors, ISAN, rental status, festivals, archives, rights, events;

• for a cultural object: name, coordinates, status, history, photos, routes, events, investment potential;

• for event: date, place, semantic code, participants, media, results, continuation.

9. User Roles

RoleReceives
Residentevents nearby, clubs, routes, training, participation
Touristroutes, cultural points, events on travel dates, audio guides
Organizerevent creation, registration, media, report, partners
Museum / Theatre / Librarydigital showcase, audience, events, educational programs
Cinematographerlocations, archives, themes, festivals, viewers, partners
School / Universityeducational routes, lectures, film clubs, project training
Poweranalytics, activity map, reports, indices, feedback
Business / philanthropistpartnerships, sponsorship, cultural investments, brand events

10. Product structure of the portal

The portal should be assembled as a single ecosystem, not a set of individual pages. The main screen shows a live map of events, knowledge and routes.

Main sections

• Today: events of the day and quick recommendations.

• Poster: Calendar of all events with filters.

• Map: cultural sites, sites, routes and events nearby.

• Cinema: films, screenings, film clubs, festivals, film locations.

• Museums: collections, exhibitions, virtual tours, educational programs.

• Heritage: cultural heritage objects, routes, restoration projects.

• Knowledge: lectures, courses, articles, techniques, events recording.

• Projects: initiative exchange, pitching, grants, partners.

• Archive: digital footprint of each event.

• International SFERA: UNESCO, Europeana, FIAF, cultural exchanges.

Member Account

The personal account records interests, events visited, certificates, clubs, routes, subscriptions, projects and recommendations. For organizers, the cabinet includes event creation, registration management, media, volunteers, report and promotion.

11. Technological Logic

Technologically, SFERA should work as a cultural graph: events, people, organizations, films, heritage sites, museum objects, routes and grants are related to each other.

Basics of the graph

EntityKey fields
Eventdate, place, topic, participants, media, result
Objectmuseum, monument, cinema, park, school, house of culture
Filmtitle, authors, status, shows, archives, festivals
Personexpert, artist, director, teacher, volunteer, viewer
Organizationmuseum, theater, foundation, university, studio, NPO, business
Routepoints, time, theme, events, audio guide
Projectteam, goal, budget, grant, status, results
Data sourceregistry, catalog, API, official document

AI-navigator

• selects events for human interests;

• collects routes for a day, weekend or trip;

• helps the organizer to describe the event and prepare a media plan;

• selects grants and partners for the project;

• analyzes the cultural activity of the city and shows weak zones.

12. Economic model

SFERA can combine public mission and a sustainable economy. It is important not to turn culture into a commercial marketplace, but to give it a financial infrastructure.

ContourSources of income / resource
B2Gurban and regional contracts, analytics, digitalization of culture, reporting
B2Bpartner packages for sites, museums, tourism, business
B2Ctickets, subscriptions, clubs, educational products, routes
GrantsPFCI, regional grants, international cultural programs
Mediapartnership materials, video production, special projects
Projectsaccelerator, pitching, application support, consortia

13. Pilot for 90 days

The first pilot should be simple enough to actually run it, and meaningful enough to show the power of the model.

PeriodFocusResult
1–30 daysBasesite, map, billboard, 100 events, 30 sites, 20 organizers, Telegram channel
31–60 daysMedia and Communitiesphoto reports, interviews, videos, film clubs, lectures, weekend collections
61–90 daysProjects and analyticsorganizer's office, grant navigator, project exchange, first festival SFERA, event index

Minimum set MVP

• home page "Today in SFERA";

• poster and event map;

• form of adding an event;

• event card with media and results;

• section "Cinema of the city";

• Knowledge section with materials after the events;

• the first cultural route;

• weekly media digest.

14. Performance indicators

To manage the project, you need not only a visit counter, but a full-fledged index of cultural eventability.

Indicator groupWhat is measured
Activitynumber of events, venues, organizers, participants
Diversitytopics, formats, age groups, districts
Availabilityshare of free events, events nearby, inclusiveness
Knowledgerecords, lectures, materials, courses, downloads
Mediaphotos, videos, publications, coverage, citation
Projectsnew initiatives, grant applications, partnerships, pilots
Heritageevents at cultural sites, routes, restoration initiatives
Cinemascreenings, film clubs, films about the city, festival projects
Internationalityexchanges, partner cities, international data and events

15. Risks and protection of meaning

RiskProtection
The risk of becoming a regular posterhard fix passport events, media archive and results
The risk of overloading with esoteric or incomprehensible languageuse clear civil, cultural and educational terminology
Risk of unreliable datarely on official registers, sources and verification
The risk of partner fragmentationbuild a single graph of links and a common calendar
Risk of lack of economydirectly include grants, tickets, partnerships, B2G/B2B-model
Risk of weak continuation after eventsclose each event with the result and the next step

16. Final Formula

“SFERA. New Order. Coded Art” is a way to bring a city together as a living cultural system. In this system, art does not stand apart from life, cinema does not exist apart from memory, an event does not disappear once its date has passed, and knowledge does not remain within closed institutions.

Final model

• SFERA is a connectivity platform.

• Events are a mechanism for the inclusion of people.

• Coded art is the language of meanings and images.

• Cinema is the memory and image of the future.

• Registers are a layer of confidence.

• AI is a navigator of culture and action.

• A new order is the result of a stable cultural organisation of society.

Final thesis:

Annex. Event Card SFERA

FieldDescription
NameBrief and clear name of the event
Typelecture, show, exhibition, forum, festival, route, master class
Meaning Codememory, image of the future, person, place, community, craft, symbol, action, knowledge, communication, economy, digital footprint, transformation
Placesite, address, coordinates, connection with the object of culture
Date and timebeginning, ending, repetition
Organizerorganization, responsible person, contacts
Partnersmuseums, schools, business, NGOs, authorities, media
Programmeevent structure and key blocks
Target audienceresidents, children, youth, tourists, professionals, families
Related objectsfilms, museums, books, routes, personalities, monuments
Media before the eventbillboard, announcement, trailer, posts
Media after the eventphoto, video, article, interview, presentation
ResultWhat was created, decided, launched, recorded
Continuednext meeting, project, grant, route, film, club

Other published edition: SFERA SPHERE_New_Study_Coded_Art_Presentation.pptx · web text +

NEW ORDER

Coded Art

The concept of the event and cultural core of the platform "City of Knowledge - City of Events"

art → knowledge → event → project → heritage

Version 1.0 · 22 August 2026

1. Meaning of the concept

SFERA connects culture, cinema, events, education, urban memory and digital registries

No Poster

Not archive

Not a marketplace

The event is not seen as a date, but as a node of knowledge, media, people and result.

Post-event materials are transformed into digital memory, educational content, and routes.

Culture is not about selling tickets: it becomes a public assembly system.

Art has meaning. The event brings meaning into action.

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

2. Coded art

Cultural form becomes an interface between a person, a city and the task of development

Image

Plot

Space

Action

Memory

visual symbol, style, sign

history, hero, conflict, choice

museum, square, route, city

participation, event, project

archive, film, knowledge, tradition

Coded Art = Aesthetics + Navigation + Action

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

3. New Order

Cultural operating system of the city

  • Connectivity: An event is related to knowledge, place, people, and outcome
  • Evidence: reliance on audited registries and sources
  • Participation: not a spectator, but a co-author and participant
  • Continuity: Heritage is included in modern life
  • Mediation: Each event produces content and the next step
  • Scalability: City → Region → Country → International Network

Culture

Projects

Knowledge

SFERA

Events

Data

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

4. Architecture SFERA

Multi-level connectivity platform

Poster

Archive

Map

Registries

Events and Calendar

Trace and Memory

objects and routes

Credibility

CULTURAL GRAFT

Media

Analysis

Knowledge

Projects

Content and coverage

Index and Reports

courses and lectures

Initiatives

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

5. Code matrix of art

Unified meaning markup for recommendations, routes and analytics

Location Code

Code of Meaning

Action Code

Memory Code

  • Playground
  • city
  • heritage
  • coordinates
  • Theme
  • value
  • genre
  • Symbol
  • Participation
  • draft
  • Role
  • Next step
  • archive
  • film
  • materials
  • Tradition

Each object, film and event receives a digital passport and a semantic code.

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

6. Event as a production unit of culture

Event produces attention, knowledge, media, communication, projects and memory

Place

People

Meaning

Action

Media

Result

site, coordinates

organizers, speakers

theme and code

participation program

photo, video, text

project, archive, continuation

The event doesn’t end with a date: it goes into knowledge, project, route or movie

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

7. Event passport SFERA

A card standard that makes an event manageable and measurable

Identity

Life Cycle

name, type, date, site and coordinates semantic code and thematic field organizer, partners, speakers, participants related films, museum objects, historical places

program, registration, tickets, broadcast media after the event: photos, videos, text, interviews results: decisions, projects, applications, new meetings archive and next step

Event passport - the basis for the registry, analytics, media and grant reporting

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

8. Cinema, culture and urban memory

Cinema enhances the image of the city and turns memory into an event

The City Film Club

The City as Film

Map of film locations

Regular Shows with Discussion

The Territory Documentary Cycle

Filming locations and new venues

Festival of City Cinema

Film Laboratory

Memory Archive

Competition for Heritage and Future

Short-Term Scenarios and Shorts

video stories of residents and masters

Film → showing → discussion → archive → route → new project

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

9. Registers and reliable data

SFERA must rely on verifiable state and international sources

Cinema

Heritage

Museums

rental certificates, national film, Gosfilmofond, ISAN

EGROKN, UNESCO World Heritage, cultural routes

State Catalogue of the Museum Fund, Europeana, collections

Festivals

Financing

Rights

Cannes, Berlinale, FIAF, LUMIERE, archives

PFCI, grants, Film Foundation, public procurement

chain of rights, licenses, territories, contracts

Data gives confidence. The connections between data provide cultural intelligence.

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

10. Product structure of the portal

The main screen shows a live map of events, knowledge and routes

Today

Poster

Map

Cinema

Museums

Heritage

Knowledge

Projects

Archive

International SFERA

Personal account of the participant

Organizer's office

interests, events visited, certificates, clubs, routes, projects and recommendations

event creation, registration, media, volunteers, reports, promotion and grants

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

11. Technological Logic

The platform works as a cultural graph

Events

  • AI selects events for human interests
  • collects routes for the day, weekend or trip
  • helps the organizer to describe the event and media plan
  • selects grants and partners
  • Analyzes cultural activity and weak areas

People

Organizations

Films

Heritage

Grants

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

12. User Roles

One platform, different value scenarios

Resident

Tourist

Organizer

Museum

events, routes, clubs

routes, museums, billboard

registration, media, report

showcase, audience, education

Cinematographer

School / University

Power

Business

locations, festivals, themes

lessons, practices, projects

analytics, activity map

partnerships, investments

Purpose: to transfer a person from the position of the viewer to the position of the participant and the creator

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

13. Economic model

Public Mission + Sustainable financial infrastructure

B2G

B2B

B2C

Urban and regional contracts, cultural analytics

partnerships, events, media, sponsorship packages

tickets, subscriptions, routes, clubs

Grants

PPP

Data

PFCI, Film Foundation, International and Regional Competitions

heritage sites, sites, tourism, restoration

event analytics, reporting, culture index

An important frontier: culture is not reduced to the market - the economy serves to develop meaning

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

14. Pilot for 90 days

The minimum set of MVP that can be actually run

Month 1 Base

Month 2 Media

Month 3 Projects

• main "Today in SFERA" • poster and event map • form of adding the event • first sites and organizers

• photo reports and interviews • weekly digest • first film clubs • section "Knowledge"

• organizer's office • affiliate program • grant navigator • first festival SFERA

Pilot's goal: to prove that an event can produce knowledge, media, and continuation

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

15. Performance indicators

City Cultural Event Index

  • Number and variety of events
  • Attendance and Re-participation
  • Number of organizers and venues
  • Percentage of Educational and Cultural Events
  • Media Coverage and Archival Footprint
  • Number of projects after events
  • Involvement of youth and volunteers
  • International Relations and Partnerships
  • Grant applications and resources raised
  • activity of heritage sites and museums

You can manage culture only when you can see not only attendance, but also the continuation of

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

16. Risks and protection of meaning

The project needs not only technology, but also cultural discipline

The risk of publicity

Noise Risk

Risk of commercialization

reduce the platform to a calendar without result

Accumulate many events without meaningful structure

replace development with ticket sales

Risk of inauthenticity

The risk of elitism

Risk of rupture

work without registers and data verification

close participation for residents and young teams

do not record the archive and continuation after the event

Protection: event passport, semantic codes, verified data, archive and result index

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

17. Final Formula

SFERA as a platform for connectivity of the new cultural order

SFERA

Events

Coded Art

Cinema

Connectivity Platform

Mechanism of inclusion of people

Language of meanings and images

Memory and image of the future

Registries

New Order

Reliability Layer

Navigator of Culture and Action

Sustainable cultural organization of society

The City of Knowledge has meaning. The City of Events puts meaning into motion. SFERA assembles it into a living cultural system.

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

Annex. Event Card SFERA

Template for MVP and further automation

Identity

Meaning

Participants

name, type, date, place

code, theme, audience

organizer, partners, speakers

Connections

Process

Next

films, museums, routes, objects

program, registration, broadcast

media, report, decisions, continuation

This template turns each event into a managed cultural asset

SFERA · New Order · Coded Art

Published files

Platform · Full published text

Managing the Elements

Source Status: Primary Document

System of coordinated interaction of nature, technology, society and territory

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/upravlenie-stikhiyami-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Not to subordinate nature, but to understand its rhythms, to prevent destructive manifestations and to direct the natural force to creation.

Strategic document • Version 1.0

22 August 2026

Summary

Element management in the EQUILIBRIUM system is an interdisciplinary model for managing natural risks, resource flows, and ecosystem restoration. It combines environmental monitoring, digital twin territories, forecasting, early warning, resource mobilization and cooperative execution.

The document describes the target concept. Specific technologies of active influence on natural processes are allowed only after scientific, environmental, legal and ethical expertise. Monitoring, prevention, adaptation and recovery are always a priority.

Purpose of the system

Ensure the stability of the territory and human security through the synchronization of five contours: Earth, Water, Air, Fire and Ether - information and coordination environment linking data, decisions and actions.

Expected effect

  • reduction of damage from natural and man-made emergencies;
  • early detection of degradation of biocenoses and sources of impact;
  • restoration of water, soil, atmospheric and energy balance;
  • Increasing the transparency of decisions and the evidence of the environmental result;
  • creation of a single mechanism for cooperation between the state, science, business and society.

Final formula

STYHIA → OBSERVATION → UNDERSTANDING → FORECAST → HARMONIZED ACTION → MEASUREMENT → RECONSTRUCTION OF EQUALITY

1. Grounds and principles

The element is understood simultaneously as the natural environment, the flow of matter or energy, a source of risk and a resource of creation. Control does not mean absolute control: the system works with probabilities, limits of intervention and feedbacks.

PrincipleContents
IntegrityConsider the atmosphere, water, soil, living organisms, human and infrastructure as a connected system.
PreventionTransfer the center of gravity from elimination of consequences to early detection and warning.
Scientific evidenceSeparate observed facts, model predictions and hypotheses; provide independent verification.
CautionDo not apply effects with irreversible consequences in case of insufficient data.
SubsidiarityMake a decision at the closest competent level to the territory.
Open liabilityIdentify the owner of the decision, grounds, resources, outcome, and consequences.
RegenerativeSeek not only to compensate for the damage, but also to restore the natural ability to self-regulation.

2. The Five Elements

ElementalManagement objectsMain result
LandSoils, subsoil, relief, landscapes, agrosystems, developmentFertility, geological and spatial stability
WaterRivers, lakes, seas, groundwater, precipitation, water supplyClean water, water balance, drought and flood resistance
AirAtmosphere, aerosols, wind, air quality, microclimateClean atmosphere, climate adaptation, safe use of wind
FireHeat, combustion, energy, fires, industrial processesSafe energy, fire prevention, resource efficiency
EtherData, communication, models, knowledge, rules, collective coordinationSingle situational picture and synchronization of actions

2.1 Land

The Earth’s contour combines monitoring of soil and subsoil conditions, assessment of erosion, landslides, subsidence, pollution, land degradation and the impact of construction. Creative mode - regenerative agriculture, reclamation, restoration of forests and landscapes, safe territorial planning.

2.2 Water

The contour of the Water forms the basin picture: quantity, quality, seasonality, sources of pollution, condition of coasts and aquatic biocenoses. It supports flood and drought forecasting, reservoir management, treatment, reuse, and ecological restoration of water systems.

2.3 Air

The air circuit links ground stations, remote sensing, weather models, and emissions inventory. It is designed for early detection of hazardous concentrations, dust and smoke plumes, thermal islands and adverse weather conditions.

2.4 Fire

The outline of Fire covers natural fires, industrial heat, and energy flows. Its mission is to prevent fires, secure local energy supply, increase efficiency and use heat without destroying ecosystems.

2.5 Ether

Ether is not a physical element in the scientific classification, but a management metaphor for the information field. It is a layer of data, communications, digital twins, standards, decision registries and public participation mechanisms.

3. Functional architecture

EQUILIBRIUM is the mind of the system. Collects data, forms a digital twin of the territory, calculates scenarios, identifies relationships and supports decision-making.

Biocenous points are the senses. Continuously observe the atmosphere, water, soil, plants, animals, microorganisms and man-made load.

ECO-PPA is a mobilization mechanism. It links a proven environmental impact to programs, resources, responsibility and long-term financing.

SFERA — space of initiatives. Conducts proposals of citizens, scientists, enterprises and municipalities through expertise, cooperation, pilot and scaling.

SPECZASHCHITA - contour of execution. It forms project consortia, production cooperation, logistics, installation, operation and restoration work.

Authorities and services - the contour of authority. Provide a legal regime, interdepartmental coordination, emergency response and control of socially significant results.

Control cycle

  1. Surveillance is the continuous collection of data and field evidence.
  2. Diagnosis is the separation of natural variability from dangerous deviation.
  3. Forecasting is the calculation of scenarios, probabilities, and event horizons.
  4. The solution is to choose an acceptable action, taking into account risks and alternatives.
  5. Mobilization is the assignment of owners, resources, timelines, and communication channels.
  6. Execution is a local action, response, or recovery.
  7. Verification is the measurement of outcome, side effects and residual risk.

4. Management levels and readiness regimes

LevelScaleModel solutions
LocalObject, quarter, biocenous pointSignal, inspection, localization, prevention
MunicipalCity or areaCoordination of services, work plan, public awareness
RegionalSubject or poolRedeployment of resources, inter-municipal regime
InterregionalSwimming pool, natural area, macroregionJoint scenarios, force reserve
NationalRussian FederationStrategic norms, a unified picture of risks, mobilization
InternationalTransboundary ecosystemsData exchange, joint warning, coordinated programmes
ModeConditionAction
GreenIndicators in the allowable rangeSurveillance and prevention
YellowSustained adverse deviationEnhanced monitoring and readiness
OrangeHigh probability of a dangerous eventPreventive deployment of resources
RedEvent occurs or is inevitableResponse, protection of people, localization
BlueAcute phase completedRestoring and Controlling the New Balance

5. Practical programs

ProgrammePurposeFirst products
Living waterRestoration of water systemsWater passport of the territory; flood forecast; recovery plan
Fertile landSoil and landscape regenerationDegradation map; reclamation program; fertility control
Clear SkyAtmospheric monitoringAir quality map; sources of emissions; warning
The Creative FireEnergy and fire safetyFire risk map; early detection; safe microgeneration
Unified FieldInformation coordinationDigital twin; risk passport; decision log
The Climate ShieldAdaptation to extreme eventsScenarios of heat, drought, rain and storms
BiocenosisRestoration of ecosystemsBiocenosis health index; plan of nature-like measures
Harmonious territoryIntegrated managementUnified Development and Environmental Sustainability Program

6. Data, digital twin and evidence

The digital twin of the territory should not represent a beautiful visualization, but a verifiable model of interconnections. Each indicator receives a source, periodicity, accuracy, owner, allowable range and escalation rule.

Minimum data classes

  • Hydrometeorological and climatic observations;
  • data on water, soils, atmosphere and biodiversity;
  • remote sensing of the Earth, unmanned and field surveys;
  • infrastructure, population, critical facilities and evacuation routes;
  • production emissions, discharges, waste and resource flows;
  • history of decisions, activities, costs and confirmed results.

Rule of Evidence

The fact, forecast and management recommendation should be displayed separately. The system must show the uncertainty of the model, the quality of the source data and alternative scenarios. Automated analysis supports the solution, but does not substitute for a legally responsible entity.

7. Performance indicators

GroupExamples KPI
WarningProportion of risks identified before acute phase; average time from signal to verification
ResponseTime of mobilization; area or number of objects protected by preventive measures
EcologyWater and air quality; soil fertility; habitat connectivity; reclaimed area
EconomyPrevented damage; cost of result; share of reused resources
Social impactCoverage by alert; trust in data; citizen participation; reducing health threats
ManagementCompleteness of data; compliance with regulations; proportion of decisions with independent verification

KPI should not encourage concealment of events or the formal achievement of indicators. The baseline, calculation methodology and independent verification are approved before the program starts.

8. Governance, roles and responsibilities

ParticipantResponsibility
Strategic CouncilPriorities, limits of intervention, interagency solutions
Scientific and Technical CouncilMethods, models, acceptability of technologies, expert disagreements
The Situation CentreA round-the-clock picture, forecasting, escalation and coordination
Regional operatorSystem deployment, data quality, readiness of performers
Project ConsortiumSpecific result, timing, budget, performance safety
Independent VerifierConfirmation of the baseline, result and absence of significant harm
Community domainObservations, feedback, control of information availability

Ethical and legal restrictions

  • Prohibition of hidden large-scale impact on natural processes;
  • mandatory assessment of environmental and transboundary impacts;
  • The principle of "do no significant harm" and the possibility of stopping the pilot;
  • protection of personal data and critical infrastructure;
  • public disclosure of the grounds of decisions within the security requirements;
  • human control over critical automated recommendations.

9. Road map of implementation

StageTimeframeKey result
0. Design0–3 monthsTerritory passport, threat register, data architecture, consortium composition
1. Base Line3–6 monthsInventory, location of points, methods and reference values KPI
2. Pilot6–12 monthsDigital twin, regulations, training scenarios, first recovery measures
3. Verification12–15 monthsIndependent assessment of the accuracy of forecasts, results and side effects
4. Scaling15–36 monthsCirculation by basins, municipalities and natural areas
5. Constant cyclefrom 36 monthsModel update, prevention, training, sustainability audit

First pilot: selection criteria

  • a pronounced but managed set of natural and man-made risks;
  • the existence of the municipality or region concerned;
  • availability of historical data and basic surveillance infrastructure;
  • the ability to obtain a measurable result within 12 months;
  • representativeness for subsequent scaling;
  • availability of a scientific partner and independent verification.

10. Passport of the pilot project

FieldContents
TerritoryPilot boundaries, population, key biocenoses and infrastructure
Issue addressedConfirmed threats, causes, seasonality and historical damage
Base LineIndicator baselines and data quality
Target resultMeasurable change, duration and allowable residual risk
DecisionEquipment, digital components, nature-like and organizational measures
ResponsibleOwner of the result, operator, supervisor, verifier
ResourcesBudget, sources of funding, staff, material reserves
SecurityRestrictions, stop scenario, protection of people and data
VerificationMeasurement method, period of control, open reporting

11. Decisions requiring approval

  1. Determine the pilot area and the owner of the result.
  2. Adopt a list of priority risks and baselines.
  3. Form a scientific and technical council and rules of independent verification.
  4. Assign a data operator and set access modes.
  5. Approve the limits of the permissible impact and the procedure for stopping the pilot.
  6. Forming a project consortium EQUILIBRIUM — SFERA — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA.
  7. Prepare a budget, a calendar plan and an agreement on the distribution of responsibility.

Conclusion

Elemental management is the transition from a fragmented response to a holistic culture of foresight and recovery. The system makes the natural dynamics visible, the solutions reasonable, the resources consistent, and the result measurable.

Its highest task is not to create the illusion of power over nature, but to restore to man the ability to live within the limits of natural balance, to protect life in a timely manner and to direct knowledge and technology to the revival of territory.

Annex. Short Glossary

TermDefinition
Biocenous pointAutonomous natural and technical complex for monitoring the local ecosystem.
Digital twin of the territoryAn updated computational model of the state, connections and scenarios of the territory.
Passport of riskA structured description of the threat, probability, consequences, indicators and measures.
Nature-like measureExposure that utilizes or restores natural self-regulation mechanisms.
VerificationIndependent confirmation of the correctness of the data, methodology and the result achieved.
Residual riskRisks that persist after the implementation of prevention and protection measures.

Other published editorial board: RUSSIA MASTER STYCHIY Russia_Master_Poem_BIOTRON_EQUILIBRIUM.docx · web text +

BIOTRON

Dynamic Model of the Biosphere

Fire • Water • Air • Earth • Ether

Strategic Concept • 2026

1. Russia — Master of the Elements

The doctrine of “Russia — Master of Elements” considers five elements as five systemic functions of the country’s development. Fire - impulse and action; Water - life and recovery; Air - knowledge and communication; Land - matter, labor and infrastructure; Ether - meaning, cycles and synchronization. Their connection forms a controlled architecture capable of seeing territory as a living system.

Five Elements as Five State Outlines

ElementalFunctionNational outlineResult
FireActionmobilization, initiative, energy of transformationspeed of transition from decision to result
WaterLifewater systems, restoration, ecosystem healthSustainability of Life Cycles
AirKnowledgescience, communication, data, education, alertquality of solutions
LandFormterritory, production, infrastructure, soilmaterial result
EtherConnectivitycycles, hypergraph, scenarios, coordinationintegrity of the system

2. BIOTHRON — dynamic model of the biosphere

BIOTRON is a digital dynamic model of the biosphere that combines observation, scientific models, artificial intelligence, geoinformation data, aerospace monitoring and scenario forecasting. Its subject is not a single object and not a single sensor, but the state of the interconnected system "atmosphere - water - soil - biota - man - technosphere".

Main objectives

  • creation of a single picture of the current state of the biosphere of the territory;
  • Identification of deviations before the transition to the crisis phase;
  • search for sources and chains of causal influence;
  • forecasting of natural and technogenic scenarios;
  • Evaluate the impact of decisions on multiple environments simultaneously;
  • selection of recovery measures with maximum cumulative effect;
  • formation of digital memory of the territory and the history of its changes.

Biotron is not

  • one centralized database of all data;
  • replacement of specialists, scientific expertise and responsible bodies;
  • automatic system of forced management of people;
  • "black box" AI without explanatory sources and models.

3. Model object: living territory contour

The atmosphere is temperature, humidity, pressure, wind, aerosols, pollutants, precipitation.

Water - rivers, lakes, groundwater, humidity, quality, water balance, floods and drought.

Soil - moisture, fertility, pollution, erosion, permafrost, geochemistry and soil stability.

Plants - productivity, state of forests, crops, phenology, stress and fires.

Animals - habitats, migrations, numbers, biodiversity, indicator species.

Microorganisms are microbiological processes, decomposition, sanitary and environmental markers.

Human - resettlement, resource consumption, quality of the environment, infrastructure dependencies.

Technosphere - enterprises, transport, energy, waste, emissions, discharges and emergency risks.

4. BIOTRONA Architecture

Architecture is built on seven interrelated levels.

1. Touch layer - ground sensors, laboratories, hydro stations, weather stations, production control systems.

2. Aerospace layer - satellites, UAVs, radar and optical observations.

3. Register layer - state, scientific, municipal, corporate and open data.

4. The layer of the digital twin is the GIS, the digital model of the territory, the communication of objects and time series.

5. Model-analytical layer - physical, biological, economic and statistical models.

6. AI- layer - search for anomalies, comparison of causes, forecast, prioritization of scenarios.

7. The contour of the solution is warning, action scenarios, performance monitoring and feedback.

5. Five elements inside the Biotron

ElementalWhat Biotron is WatchingWhat forecastsWhat response forms
Fireenergy, fires, thermal anomalies, emergency processesDissemination and consequencesprevention, localization, recovery
Waterrunoff, quality, scarcity, floods, pollutionWater balance and risksSource Management and Recovery
Airmeteorological processes, pollution, aerosols, information signalstransport and dynamicsnotification and change of action
Landsoil, permafrost, vegetation, infrastructuredegradation and sustainabilityreclamation, protection, repair
Etherrelations, cycles and complex index of stateSystemic scenariossynchronization of solutions between contours

Dynamic equilibrium index

For management, BIOTRON forms not one “magic” score, but a set of transparent indices: the state of the environment, the rate of change, sustainability, the risk of crossing the threshold, recovery potential and trust in data. The resulting panel shows not only the level of risk, but also its origin and range of uncertainty.

6. BIOTRONA operating modes

Normal mode

observation, digital double update, background forecast.

Attention Mode

An anomaly above the background oscillations; enhanced observation and verification.

Warning Mode

A credible scenario of potentially dangerous development is being formed.

Crisis regime

rapid interagency response and scenario management.

Recovery Mode

control of regeneration of the territory and prevention of repeated damage.

Five Questions about Biotron

  1. What's going on now?
  2. Why is this happening?
  3. What will happen if the trend continues?
  4. What actions are available and what are their side effects?
  5. How to check if the state has returned to a stable trajectory?

7. Digital double of the biosphere of Russia

The national digital twin is built federally: local and industry models retain their own responsibility and data quality, but use compatible standards, ontologies and interfaces. This allows you to see the picture of the country without having to physically collect everything in one system.

Levels

  • observation point / object;
  • ecosystem / catchment / municipal contour;
  • region;
  • natural and climatic zone;
  • Federal level;
  • cross-border and international boundaries.

Key maps

  • water and water balance map;
  • map of the atmosphere and pollution transfer;
  • soil map, degradation and permafrost;
  • Map of forests, fires and biodiversity;
  • map of technogenic load;
  • Map of vulnerability of the population and infrastructure;
  • Map of recovery potential;
  • A map of systemic risks and cascade effects.

8. BIOTRON and GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM"

BIOTRON becomes the terrestrial biosphere core of the global aerospace monitoring and forecasting system EQUILIBRIUM. GASMP provides wide surveillance and early signals; BIOTRON links them to the state of specific ecosystems and models the consequences.

ContourFunctionContact
GASMPGlobal Aerospace Surveillancegives a wide signal and macrodynamics
BIOTRONDynamic Model of BiosphereExplains the local and systemic implications
EQUILIBRIUMSupersystem coordinationConnects prediction with solutions and recovery

9. BIOTRONA National Programmes

BIOTRON.VODA — water balance, quality, basin management and restoration.

BIOTRON.LES - forest health, fires, carbon and water cycle, biodiversity.

BIOTRON.POSHUA - fertility, erosion, pollution, permafrost and recovery.

BIOTHRON.AIR - air quality, pollution transfer and meteorics.

BIOTRON.GOROD - ecology of agglomerations, heat, water, transport and infrastructure risks.

BIOTRON.ARCTICS — permafrost, ice processes, infrastructure and climate dynamics.

BIOTRON.AGRO - moisture, yield, soil, biodiversity and sustainable agriculture.

BIOTRON.PROM — technogenic load, industrial risks and recovery measures.

BIOTHRON.BIORISN - habitats, migrations, indicator species and ecosystem sustainability.

BIOTHRON. HEALTH ENVIRONMENT - an integral assessment of the quality of the environment without profiling citizens.

10. BIOTHRON and 365 events

365 events of the five elements become the public-scientific interface of BIOTRONA. Civil surveillance can complement a professional system only after quality labeling and verification.

  • days of observation of water and small rivers;
  • phenological observations and the state of plants;
  • environmental routes and photo recording of changes;
  • public actions of recovery;
  • school and university research projects;
  • transfer of environmental management practices;
  • Annual Biosphere Day: a general comparison of results.

11. Management and scientific verification

BIOTRON should be built as a scientific and managerial infrastructure with a division of roles. The decision-making body should not single-handedly determine the quality of the data; the model should be verifiable, the version should be fixed, and the critical conclusions should undergo specialized examination.

Roles

  • scientific council - methods and models;
  • data operator - standards, quality, origin and access;
  • Situation Centre - Monitoring and Scenarios
  • relevant departments - decisions within the scope of powers;
  • regions and municipalities - local implementation;
  • business - data and reduction of impact;
  • society and education - observation, participation and control of open results.

Principles

  • Evidence and origin of data;
  • explainability of models and range of uncertainty;
  • separation of recommendations AI and legally significant decisions;
  • protection of personal and sensitive data;
  • open aggregates where it is safe;
  • Independent verification of key environmental findings.

12. KPI BIOTRONA

IndicatorWhat is measured
CoverageThe proportion of priority territories with a digital dynamic model.
Speedtime from the appearance of the anomaly to its detection.
AccuracyThe number of warnings confirmed by subsequent observations.
Causalitythe proportion of incidents with an established chain of sources of exposure.
PreventionAssesses the number of preventable crises and the number of preventable damages.
RecoveryThe system returns to a stable trajectory.
Data qualitypercentage of data with proven proven provenance and validated methodology.
Integrationnumber of compatible departmental and scientific contours.
Opennessshare of safe aggregates available to society.
Trainingreducing the repeatability of typical errors after the introduction of feedback.

13. BIOTRONA road map

StageHorizonScaleResult
1. Methodology0–6 months3–5 model territoriesontology, indicators, data quality protocols
2. Pilot6–18 months1 Region + Several ecosystemsDigital twins and predictive scenarios
3. Interregional network18–36 months5–10 regionsUnified interfaces and situational analytics
4. National outline3–5 yearsPriority Territories of RussiaFederative Digital Biosphere Double
5. International cooperation4–7 yearstransboundary basins and ecosystemsComparable models and early warning

14. Russia as a Master of Nature

In finite architecture, the Master Element does not mean domination over nature, but a high culture of complexity management. Fire gives you the will to act. Water saves lives. The air makes knowledge accessible and reliable. The earth is holding the result. Ether synchronizes cycles and connects solutions. BIOTRON makes this architecture observable, predictive, and learning.

RUSSIA — MASTER OF SCIENCES

Biotron is the digital sense of the living planet.

Other published edition: RUSSIA Russia_Master_Poem_BIOTRON_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

THE MASTER OF TYMES

BIOTRON

Dynamic Model of the Biosphere

Fire • Water • Air • Earth • Ether

Watch → understand → predict → warn → recover

Russia — Master of the Elements

Five functions of one national system

FIRE

action

EFIR

WATER

Synchronization

Life

RUSSIA

LAND

AIR

Form

Knowledge

BIOTRON

Digital sense of living territory

What is it?

What is changing

Dynamic model of the biosphere, connecting observation, scientific models, AI, GIS, aerospace data and scenario prediction.

We move from static report to dynamic: state → change rate → threshold → scenario → action → recovery.

BIOTRON sees not an object, but a system of "nature - man - technosphere".

What Biotron Models

Living territory contour

Atmosphere

Water

Soil

Plants

temperature, wind, aerosols

stock, quality, balance

moisture, fertility, pollution

condition, stress, fires

Animals

Microorganisms

Person

Technosphere

areas, migrations, numbers

Biological processes and markers

Quality of environment and dependencies

enterprises, transport, networks, risks

BIOTRONA Architecture

Seven levels from sensor to solution

sensors, laboratories, hydro stations, weather stations

Sensory layer

satellites, UAVs, optics, radar

Aerospace layer

government, scientific and corporate data

Register layer

GIS, time series, digital territory model

Digital twin

physical, biological, statistical models

Model-analytical layer

anomalies, causality, prognosis, priorities

AI-layer

warning, script, execution, feedback

Solution Outline

Five elements inside the Biotron

Each element is a separate type of observation and response

FIRE

energy, fires, thermal anomalies

Localization and Recovery

WATER

runoff, shortages, pollution, floods

Source and Basin Management

AIR

weather processes, pollution, transport

notification and change of action

LAND

soil, permafrost, infrastructure

reclamation, protection, repair

EFIR

cycles, links, system indexes

synchronization of solutions

Working modes

From Background Monitoring to Recovery

Norma

Warning

Warning

Crisis

Recovery

background and update model

Anomaly above natural fluctuations

A sustainable dangerous scenario

rapid inter-agency response

Controlling return to a sustainable trajectory

The goal is to see earlier, to understand more accurately and to act until irreversible damage.

Digital double of the biosphere of Russia

Federal model instead of one giant base

Point of observation

Ecosystem / catchment

Municipality

Region

Natural and climatic zone

Federal level

Local models retain responsibility, but use compatible standards, ontology and API.

map of water and water balance

map of atmosphere and pollution transport

map of soils, permafrost and degradation

Map of forests, fires and biodiversity

technogenic load map

Map of recovery capacity

BIOTHRON + GASMP + EQUILIBRIUM

Three levels of one early warning system

GASMP

BIOTRON

EQUILIBRIUM

Global aerospace surveillance.
Gives a wide signal and macrodynamics.

Explains the local and systemic implications for the biosphere.

Link the forecast to the solution, execution, and recovery.

See before → understand deeper → act targeted → recover faster

BIOTRONA National Programmes

From water and forest to the Arctic and industry

BIOTRON.WATER

BIOTRON.LES

BIOTRON.SHOW

BIOTHRON.AIR

BIOTRON.GOROD

the Targeted Monitoring and Recovery Module

the Targeted Monitoring and Recovery Module

the Targeted Monitoring and Recovery Module

the Targeted Monitoring and Recovery Module

the Targeted Monitoring and Recovery Module

BIOTRON.ARCTICS

BIOTRON.AGRO

BIOTRON.PROM

BIOTHRON.BIORISING

BIOTHRON. HEALTH ENVIRONMENT

the Targeted Monitoring and Recovery Module

the Targeted Monitoring and Recovery Module

the Targeted Monitoring and Recovery Module

the Targeted Monitoring and Recovery Module

the Targeted Monitoring and Recovery Module

Science, management, responsibility

Biotron should not be a black box.

Scientific Council

Data Operator

The Situation Centre

Methods and models

quality and origin

monitoring and scenarios

Offices

Regions

Society and education

Decisions within the authority

Local implementation

Participation and Open Results

AI recommends and explains. A legally significant decision is made by the responsible body.

KPI BIOTRONA

The main thing is to prevent damage and restore stability

KPI 1

KPI 2

Coverage of priority areas

Time of anomaly detection

KPI 3

KPI 4

Accuracy of warnings

Proportion of cases with established causation

KPI 5

KPI 6

Prevented damage

Recovery Time

KPI 7

KPI 8

quality and origin of data

Number of compatible circuits

Road map

From methodology to national digital twin

0–6 months

6–18 months

18–36 months

3–5 years

4–7 years

Methodology

Pilot of the region

Interregional network

National outline

International cooperation

Each stage - with data validation, independent examination and measurement of the real effect.

RUSSIA — MASTER OF SCIENCES

The Five Elements + BIOTRON + EQUILIBRIUM

Early warning, early warning,
Creation and Recovery

Biotron is the digital sense of the living planet.

EQUILIBRIUM • 2026

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM. 10 POWERFUL THEMES. ENTERING REALITY

Source Status: Primary Document

ENTERING REALITY

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/ekvilibrium-10-smyslov-vkhozhdenie-v-realnost

Open on the site

Not a program of destruction, but a program of awakening.

Not a fight against peace, but a return of peace to integrity.

Strategic Manifesto • 2026

Preamble

We have entered an era in which not only technology and institutions are changing, but the world is changing. The speed of information has exceeded the speed of awareness. Technology has outpaced human maturity. The economy has in many cases been separated from life, politics from the long horizon, and culture from the deep.

Humanity has found itself inside a global noise, where it is increasingly difficult to distinguish between truth and simulation, development and degradation, freedom and governance, progress and loss of human beings.

EQUILIBRIUM proposes a different principle: not to create another dogma, but to form a space of clarity, balance and creative action. 10 meanings are the ten pillars for the transition from a fragmented world to a holistic reality.

They are not attacks on people, countries or cultures. These are the impulses of inertia, chaos, disunity, depersonalization and loss of the future.

1. AWAKENING

We're announcing the end of the sleep era. A person must regain the ability to see, think, feel and independently distinguish reality. Freedom does not begin with external permission, but with an inner capacity for awareness.

"Reality begins where the imposed illusion ends."

2. The Dignity of Man

A person is not a product, not a function or a digital profile. Each person is a carrier of potential, will, creativity and responsibility. The system of the future must strengthen man, not reduce him to a unit of consumption or statistics.

“Man is not a resource. Man is the source of creation.”

3. SOVEREIGNNESS

The main struggle of the XXI century is for attention, interpretation and the ability to form your own picture of the world. Sovereignty of consciousness means the right to independent thinking, information hygiene, protection from manipulation and a mature attitude towards influence technologies.

“He who owns his attention owns the direction of his own life.”

4. TECHNOLOGIES ETHICS

Artificial intelligence, biotechnology, digital platforms, and new computing systems must serve the development of life. Technological power without ethics is capable of increasing the scale of errors. EQUILIBRIUM raises the question not only "what is possible?", but also "for what it should be created?".

"Technology should enhance life, not replace it."

5. ECONOMY OF LIFE

The economy of the future should measure not only income and production, but also the quality of human development, environmental health, the sustainability of territories, trust and long-term public benefit. Finance should become a tool for the creative movement of resources.

“Money should serve life, not life money.”

6. COOPERATION TOGETHER WAR

The world is too interdependent to exist indefinitely in the logic of total confrontation. The next level of development is the cooperation of states, peoples, science, business, culture and civil communities where there are common tasks and common risks.

"The strongest system of the future is the one that can unite."

7. CULTURE AS A BASIS

Culture is not a decorative application to economics. It sets the language, norms, limits, the image of the hero and the image of the future. Without a cultural basis, technology becomes blind, institutions become soulless, and development becomes meaningless.

"Culture is the operating system of civilization."

8. MAN AND NATURE

Human beings do not exist outside the biosphere. The New Order requires the connection between the economy, technology and the laws of living systems to be restored. Environmental responsibility must move from a slogan to a measurable structure for observation, prevention, restoration and careful use of resources.

"The future is possible only in union with life."

9. FUTURE CREATION

The future does not appear automatically. It is created by decisions of today: education, science, culture, infrastructure, responsibility, courage and imagination. A society without a vision of the future inevitably becomes hostage to other people’s scenarios.

“The future is not waiting. The future is a project.”

10. REALIZATION IMPROVEMENT

The tenth sense unites the previous nine. Entering Reality is a transition from fear to awareness, from chaos to structure, from consumption to creation, from disunity to cooperation, from technological dependence to meaningful management of technology. EQUILIBRIUM becomes not a theory, but a practice of balance between man, society, nature and the future.

“EQUILIBRIUM is the ability to live in reality without losing a person.”

Single formula 10 meanings

The Awakening → Dignity → Sovereignty of Consciousness → Ethics of Technology → Economy of life → Cooperation → Culture → Nature → Building the future → Entering into reality.

This sequence sets the logic of movement: from the inner man to the institutions; from the institutions to the civilizational structure; from the device to the reality in which development and equilibrium cease to contradict each other.

Principles of practical implementation

PrinciplePractical meaning
The Man in the CenterAny decision is assessed by its impact on human dignity, freedom, development and security.
EvidenceMeanings should be supported by data, results and transparent criteria, not just declarations.
CooperationCommon tasks are solved through the combination of competencies, resources and responsibility.
The Long HorizonDecisions are judged not only on current benefits, but also on the consequences for future generations.
BalanceEconomics, technology, culture, society, and nature are all seen as elements of the same system.
CreationThe main criterion is the ability to produce a real positive result.

Final Declaration

We are not proposing a new dogma to the world.

We offer to return the ability to distinguish reality.

We do not call for the destruction of the existing world. We propose to combine what has been broken: man and meaning, science and ethics, technology and responsibility, economy and life, state and society, civilization and nature.

Ten meanings are ten points around which a new order is built.

The first step is to see. The second is to realize. The third is to connect. The fourth is to act.

EQUILIBRIUM is not an escape from reality. It's the entrance to it.

Other published edition: 10 SUCCESSFUL MEANINGS EQUILIBRIUM_10_smyslov_Vhozhdenie_v_Realnost.pptx · Web Text +

ENTERING REALITY

A civilization manifesto about man, consciousness, technology, economics, and the future.

Not a new dogma, a new ability to see and act.

Manifest • 2026

Moment of choice

PREAMBLE

The old pictures of the world cease to explain the new reality.

INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGIES

ECONOMY

CULTURE

The speed of flow exceeded the speed of awareness

opportunities ahead of human maturity

Efficiency separated from quality of life

Form is increasingly pushing out depth.

The choice of the XXI century: not between the systems of the past, but between conscious creation and chaotic decay.

AWAKENING

SMYSL 1

The end of sleep is the return of self-perception.

Seeing reality without filters

Freedom begins with the awakening of consciousness.

Think for yourself and check the reasons

MEANING

Understand the consequences of your own decisions

The Dignity of Man

SMYSL 2

Human is not a function of the system or a digital profile.

Dignity is above utility

Man is not a resource. Man is the source of reality.

Personal development - a criterion of system quality

MEANING

Technology must enhance human potential

SOVEREIGNNESS

SMYSL 3

The main deficit of the era is managed attention.

The right to independent thinking

Those who control attention form reality.

Protection of attention from manipulative mechanisms

MEANING

Responsibility for your own picture of the world

TECHNOLOGIES ETHICS

SMYSL 4

Progress without ethics can become an accelerator of degradation.

AI — for human development

Technology should serve life, not replace it.

Biotechnology within the limits of responsibility

MEANING

Digital infrastructure without total control

ECONOMY OF LIFE

SMYSL 5

The economy of the future does not measure profit alone.

Benefits and social value

Money is an instrument of development, not the ultimate goal.

Quality of environment and human capital

MEANING

Long-term contribution to the development of the Territory

COOPERATION TOGETHER WAR

SMYSL 6

The next level of strength is the ability to combine.

Partnership instead of excessive confrontation

The winner is the one who is able to synchronize efforts.

Collective intelligence instead of isolation

MEANING

Collaborative projects instead of zero-sum games

CULTURE AS A BASIS

SMYSL 7

Culture is not an ornament of society, but its operating system.

Memory connects generations

Without culture, technology is blind, and the economy is losing purpose.

Meanings give direction to technology

MEANING

Art builds the ability to see more

MAN AND NATURE

SMYSL 8

Man is part of a single system of life.

Environmental responsibility

The future begins with the balance of man and earth.

Restoration of natural balance

MEANING

Development without destroying the basis of life

FUTURE CREATION

SMYSL 9

The future is not expected; it is designed.

Vision of the future as a joint task

Creation is a practical form of hope.

Idea → project → action → measurable result

MEANING

Responsibility for the consequences of the chosen course

ENTERING REALITY

SMYSL 10

The final meaning is the transition from declarations to the state of the system.

From fear to awareness

EQUILIBRIUM: The balance of freedom, responsibility and development.

From Chaos to Structure

TRANSITION

From consumption to creation

Not a new dogma. A new ability to live in reality.

FINAL DECLARATION

EQUILIBRIUM connects people, society, nature and technology into a single development architecture.

AWAKENING

DIGNITY

SOVEREIGNTY

ETHICS

ECONOMY OF LIFE

COOPERATION

CULTURE

EQUALITY

CREATION

REALITY

10 meanings is not an attack on peace. It is a transition to the ability to see, connect, and create.

EQUILIBRIUM • REALIZATION IMPROVEMENT

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM. BOOK OF UNIVERSAL LAWS AND UNIFIED TECHNOLOGIES

Source Status: Primary Document

BOOK OF UNIVERSAL LAWS AND UNIFIED TECHNOLOGIES

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/kniga-universalnykh-zakonov-i-unifitsirovannykh-tekhnologii

Open on the site

Code of systemic development of man, society, economy, technology and civilization

9 Volumes • Unified architecture • Version 1.0

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

Positioning the book

Not dogma, but an open system framework for designing complex systems.

What is it?

Who it is for

Main criterion

A set of universal laws, principles of self-organization and unified technologies connected into a single development architecture.

Strategists, researchers, development institutions, international organizations, technology teams, designers and managers.

Universality must be confirmed by applicability, and technology by measurable result, safety, and feedback.

Positioning

Single architecture 9 volumes

Consistency from patterns to responsible development.

III

VII

VIII

Laws

Principles

EUT

Application

EQUILIBRIUM

Global model

Deployment

Economy

Person

LAWS → PRINCIPLES → TECHNOLOGIES → APPLICATION → EQUILIBRIUM → DEVELOPMENT

Book Map

TOM I. Universal Laws

The key meaning of the volume and its place in the overall architecture.

Composition

Volume I

Unity • Energy • Resonance • Balance • Cause and effect • Information • Field • Cycles • Evolution • Return

Universal Laws

Formula / Principle

SYSTEM = resources + information + Communications + Cycles + Objectives + feedback

The architectural layer

Volume I

Volume II. Principles of Self-Organization

The key meaning of the volume and its place in the overall architecture.

Composition

Volume II

Integrity • Fractality • Hierarchy • Connectivity • Stream • Balance • Feedback • Adaptability • Cooperation • Meaning

Principles of Self-Organization

Formula / Principle

LAW → PRINCIPLE →

The architectural layer

Volume II

Volume III. Unified Unified Technologies

The key meaning of the volume and its place in the overall architecture.

Composition

TOM III

Stream • Resonance • Balance • Meaning • Cooperation • Feedback • Evolution

Unified Unified Technologies

Formula / Principle

ENTER → observation → analysis → synchronization → action → result

The architectural layer

TOM III

Volume IV. Application

The key meaning of the volume and its place in the overall architecture.

Composition

Volume IV

State • Economics • Man • AI • Ecology and biocenoses

Application

Formula / Principle

Diagnostics → target → pilot → measurement → adjustment → scaling

The architectural layer

Volume IV

TOM V. EQUILIBRIUM

The key meaning of the volume and its place in the overall architecture.

Composition

TOM V

Monitoring • Analytics • Cooperation • Resources • Project execution • Feedback

EQUILIBRIUM

Formula / Principle

Unified operational architecture of development

Integration Core

TOM V

Volume VI. Global model

The key meaning of the volume and its place in the overall architecture.

Composition

Volume VI

Voluntariness • Data Sovereignty • Open Standards • Technological Neutrality • Verifiability of Result

Global model

Formula / Principle

Compatible mechanisms without destroying the autonomy of participants

The architectural layer

Volume VI

Volume VII. Deployment strategy

The key meaning of the volume and its place in the overall architecture.

Composition

TOM VII

Pilots • System extension • National integration • International cooperation • Global network

Deployment strategy

Formula / Principle

PILOT → MASSTAB → SYNCHRONIZATION → NETWORK

The architectural layer

TOM VII

Volume VIII. Economy of the future

The key meaning of the volume and its place in the overall architecture.

Composition

TOM VIII

EFS • "Money that thinks" • Smart capital flow • Digital rights • Proof

Economy of the future

Formula / Principle

Finance is linked to result, risk and value created

The architectural layer

TOM VIII

Volume IX. Man and Consciousness

The final book: subject, responsibility and meaning of development.

Composition

Volume IX

FENIX • Resources • Warning • Competences • Values • Objectives • Responsibility

Man and Consciousness

Formula / Principle

Technology serves man; man is responsible for ends and permissible means

The Human Core

Volume IX

EQUILIBRIUM as an integration kernel

Observation

data, indicators, signals

Five interconnected circuits instead of one centralized mechanism.

Feedback

Analysis

verification, adjustment

risks, forecasts, scenarios

EQUILIBRIUM

Implementation

Cooperation

projects, pilots, scale

participants, roles, consortia

Resources

finance, assets, competences

Core architecture

Deployment strategy

Implementation through proof of result, not through a one-time replacement of institutions.

Pilot

Extension

Integration

Cooperation

Network

City / Organization / Industry

Region / Sector

National protocols

International Programs

Global Compatibility

Criteria for transition between stages: Measurable result • security • economic stability • trust • scalability

Road map

EFS Economic Outline

Financial flow is associated with rights, risk, targets and confirmed results.

Meaning

Right

Resource

Result

Verification

Scale

Why we fund

Who and what is entitled

what is being sent

What is created

what is confirmed

What the next resource gets

“Money that thinks”

Border Security

Metaphor of the programmable financial circuit: rules for the use of funds, stages and results indicators are formalized in digital mechanisms.

Automation does not override law, auditing, human liability and applicable financial regulation.

EFS

International Positioning

How to present the system at the institutional level without excessive statements.

Formula

Principles

Login Format

Universal development coordination system based on compatible data, open standards, pilot programs and independent verification of the result.

Volunteering. Sovereignty of data. Technological neutrality. Verifiability. Security. Step by step. Maintain the autonomy of participants.

Not a “replacement of the world system”, but a network of pilots, common protocols and joint programs with measurable results.

UN / BRICS / G20

Universality must be confirmed by applicability. Technology is the result. Development is a responsibility.

FINAL SITUATION

EQUILIBRIUM - development through balance, coherence, evidence and cooperation.

Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov • SOKOL EQUILIBRIS

Published files

EQUILIBRIUM · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM. Civilisation

Source Status: Primary Document

and a harmonious future

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/tsivilizatsiya-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Strategic document • Moscow • 2026

Annotation

“Civilization” is a top-level framework document describing the structure of a society capable of developing human beings, preserving cultural and natural diversity, creating equitable institutions and directing technology for the common good. The doctrine does not offer a single model for all peoples. It defines universal grounds for cooperation while preserving sovereignty, traditions and many ways of development.

The document combines philosophy and practical architecture: the image of man and society, the value code, the principles of legitimacy, twenty systems of life, institutional roles, the economy of creation, scientific, technological and environmental contours, security, international cooperation, indicators and a roadmap.

Purpose

  • Doctrinal basis of the system EQUILIBRIUM and its program outlines.
  • A common language for the state, science, business, culture and civil society.
  • Constructor of strategies of territories, industries and international cooperations.
  • The basis for public discussion; specific solutions require legal and scientific verification.

Structure

1. Civilizing challenge

2. Definition and scope

3. The image of the future

4. Value Code

5. Man of Civilization

6. 13 Principles

7. 20 systems

8. Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

9. State and law

10. The Economics of Creation

11. Science and technology

12. Culture and education

13. Nature and Biosphere

14. Security

15. Planetary cooperation

16. Transition Management

17. Indicators

18. Road map

19. Risks and guarantees

20. Manifesto

1. Civilizing challenge

Humanity is entering an era where the scale of opportunity has equalled the scale of responsibility. Artificial intelligence, biotechnology, energy, space and global communications allow us to solve problems that are inaccessible to past generations. But the same tools increase inequality, manipulation, environmental pressures, and the risks of systemic catastrophes if not embedded in ethics and fair institutions.

ContradictionRiskThe Civilizational Response
The Power of Technology / The Weakness of InstitutionsUnmanaged consequencesEthics, Law and Preliminary Risk Assessment
Global Connectivity/Confidence DeficitPolarization and conflictrules of dialogue and joint missions
Production growth / biosphere limitsdegradation of the foundations of lifeRestructuring economy
Abundance of information / lack of meaningmanipulation and loss of subjectivityEducation Thinking and Media maturity
Growth of opportunities / unequal accessEnshrining the exceptionUniversal Basic Capabilities
Change rate / generation gapLoss of memory and experienceMentoring and living continuity

1.1. Main criterion

2. Definition and scope

2.1. Seven layers of civilization

LayerContents
Smyslovathe image of peace, goals, values, the idea of a decent life
Humanhealth, ability, identity, freedom and responsibility
Culturallylanguages, memory, art, traditions and norms of interaction
Institutionallaw, governance, education, economics and social organizations
Scientific and technologicalknowledge, infrastructure and means to transform the world
Naturalbiosphere, water, soil, climate, biodiversity and resources
TemporaryContinuity, the ability to act on the horizon of generations

2.2. Levels

  • Personality: Inner culture and the ability to act responsibly.
  • Community: Trust, mutual assistance and the co-creation of public goods.
  • People and State: Sovereign Path of Development, Law and Institutions.
  • Humanity: Cooperation on issues that cannot be solved alone.

3. The Future of Civilization

The civilization of the future is not a complete utopia and not a single center of control of the world. It is a system of agreed principles and compatible institutions that allow different societies to cooperate without losing identity and sovereignty.

3.1. Seven Qualities

QualityManifestation
Human-centerednessInstitutions serve the dignity and development of the individual
Fairnessrules are open, rights are protected, access to opportunities is expanding
CreativityWork and entrepreneurship increase social value
Co-operationThe competition of ideas is combined with cooperation in the common cause
Evidencedecisions are based on data, experience and recognition of uncertainty
Eco-friendlyThe economy is rebuilding its life systems
Long-termthe interests of future generations are included in this decision

3.2. Five transitions

FromK
Human as a resourceHuman as a Development Goal
Growth at any costimproving quality of life and vitality
Control through closureTrust management through law and data
Fragmentary Projectsthe Full Life Cycle Missions
Competition of Civilizationsdialogue and cooperation without loss of sovereignty

4. Value Code

ValueCivilizing Meaning
Dignityman is not a means or object of arbitrary control
Lifepreservation and development of life - the limit of permissible solutions
Freedomthe right to think, create, choose and participate
TruthRespect for facts, memory, science, and honest recognition of mistakes
FairnessProportionality of rights, responsibilities, contributions and support
SolidarityWillingness to protect the weak and act for the common good
Creationtransforming the world without destroying the foundations of the future
Measurebalance personal and general, speed and safety
Diversitydifferences of peoples, cultures and ways — a resource for development
ContinuityLinking generations and responsibility for future generations
Beautyharmony of form, content and environment
Careattention to people, community and wildlife

5. Man of Civilization

Civilization does not exist for the sake of abstract order, but for the sake of revealing human potential. A mature person is able to combine inner freedom with responsibility, personal initiative with respect for the general, knowledge with the ethics of application.

AbilityResult
Self-determinationUnderstand the values, vocation and boundaries of responsibility
Critical ThinkingDistinguish between fact, opinion, interest and manipulation
EmpathyHe sees the dignity of others and can lead a dialogue
CreationTurns ideas into useful and beautiful results
CooperationAgrees, distributes roles and complies with obligations
Self-regulationManages attention, emotions, time and the digital environment
Environmental ownershipUnderstand the dependence of humans on living systems
Civic maturityparticipate in community affairs and protect the right to
The Long HorizonConsider the implications for future generations

6. Thirteen Principles of Civilization

1. Man is a goal

Efficiency does not justify the humiliation and transformation of a person into a means

2. The right above arbitrary

power is limited by law, procedure and the possibility of appeal

3. Freedom and responsibility

freedom of one is compatible with the dignity and freedom of the other

4. Unity in Diversity

General rules do not eliminate differences in cultures and ways

5. Subsidiarity

The decision is made at the nearest competent level

6. Evidence

In meaningful decisions, facts, assessments, and value choices are separated.

7. Caution

Irreversible risk requires prior verification

8. Openness

Publicly significant data, roles and conflicts of interest are disclosed

9. Cooperation

Common threats and opportunities require joint mechanisms

10. Recovery

development returns more vitality to nature and society

11. Continuity

changes retain memory and the ability to transfer experience

12. Fair access

Basic capabilities are independent of origin and place of life

13. The Long Horizon

Future generations will be recognized as a party to this decision

7. Twenty Systems of Life

№SystemMission
1Man and familyhealth, dignity, care and development
2EducationContinuous development of abilities and thinking
3ScienceKnowledge, honesty and responsibility of discovery
4CultureMemory, Language, Art and the Image of the Future
5Health careprevention, accessibility and personal health trajectory
6Workskills, decent employment and cooperation
7EconomyCreation and fair distribution of long-term value
8FinanceDirecting capital towards sustainable development
9EntrepreneurshipResponsible initiative and innovation
10Rightequality, predictability and dignity
11Public administrationService, Competence and Feedback
12Social cooperationSelf-organization and joint ownership of the result
13Nature and biocenosessurveillance, protection and rehabilitation
14Energyreliability, availability and harm reduction
15Food and watersafety, quality and resource reproduction
16Cities and territoriesaccessible, beautiful and viable environment
17Information and MediaReliability, dialogue and protection of attention
18Digital environment and AIEnhancing opportunities for risk control
19Securitythreat prevention and protection of rights
20Planetary cooperationGeneral rules for the common tasks of mankind

8. Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

EQUILIBRIUM is the operational architecture of civilizational equilibrium. It does not replace states and public institutions, but combines observation, initiative, expertise, resources, execution and confirmation of the result.

ContourRole
EQUILIBRIUMobservation, forecasting, balance and risk modeling
SFERAa single space of initiatives, expertise and cooperation
ECO‑PPAMobilization of public and private resources for measurable results
SPECZASHCHITACo-operative Organization of Execution and Production Co-operation
Scientific and Expert Networkmethodology, standards, independent verification
Community domainhuman participation, protection of rights and feedback
Financial OutlineLong-term instruments, social investment and risk sharing

8.1. End-to-end cycle

8.2. Legitimacy test

  • The decision does not violate basic human rights and dignity.
  • Authority, responsibility and conflict of interest are disclosed.
  • Risks to nature, society and future generations are assessed.
  • There is feedback, a right of appeal and a stop mechanism.
  • The result is checked and not replaced by the volume of resources used.

9. State and law

A strong state in the civilization of the New Order is determined not by the scope of intervention, but by the ability to ensure law, security, strategic horizon, basic capabilities and space for free initiative.

FunctionContents
Legalequality before the law, independent court, predictable procedure
Strategiclong-term goals, infrastructure and protection against systemic risks
SocialAccess to education, health, culture and basic safety
Evolvingconditions for science, entrepreneurship, cooperation and territories
Environmentalnatural capital accounting and restoration of life systems
InternationalProtection of sovereignty and participation in the rules of the common peace

10. The Economics of Creation

The economy of civilization assesses not only the volume of production and financial result, but also the quality of human capital, the stability of territories, trust, the state of nature, technological independence and the ability to reproduce the future.

10.1. Five capitals

CapitalWhat is preserved and developed
Humanhealth, knowledge, abilities, will and creativity
Socialtrust, institutions, communication and a culture of cooperation
Productioninfrastructure, technology and competencies
Naturalecosystems, water, soil, biodiversity and climate resilience
Smyslovaidentity, memory, goals and image of the future

10.2. Tools

  • Full-life cycle mission programs.
  • Cooperative and shared ownership models.
  • Public-private-public partnerships with measurable impact.
  • Long-term capital, trust funds, green and social instruments.
  • Full accounting of external effects and cost of recovery.

11. Science and technology

StageMandatory question
ResearchWhat new opportunities and risks does knowledge create?
DesignWhose values and interests are embedded in the system?
TestHow are security, offsets and limit modes checked?
ImplementationWho is responsible, who can stop and how to appeal the decision?
OperationHow are real effects monitored?
CompletionHow does the system come out without data loss, rights and sustainability?

11.1. AI As a public infrastructure

  • A person keeps the last word in legally and vitally important decisions.
  • The origin of the data and synthetic content is indicated.
  • Algorithmic criteria are subject to audit and public control.
  • AI complements thinking and creativity, but does not negate authorship and responsibility.

12. Culture and education

Culture shapes the language of values and the image of the future; education turns it into human abilities. Together they provide civilizational continuity and freedom of renewal.

Area of workTask
Family and early childhoodlanguage, trust, play, affection and sense of beauty
Schoolthinking, cooperation, scientific method, art and civil practice
Vocational educationskills, technological culture and dignity of work
UniversityResearch, freedom of thought and responsibility of knowledge
Continuous learningCompetencies throughout life
Mentoringtransfer of skill, character and practical wisdom
Public culturedialogue, memory, creativity and participation in the life of the territory

12.1. The cultural minimum of civilization

  • Ability to read complex text, verify a statement and conduct a reasoned dialogue.
  • Knowledge of the history of their country and the main cultures of humanity without humiliating another.
  • Experience of art, craft, scientific research and common cause.
  • Digital literacy, attention management and ethics of interaction with AI.

13. Nature and Biosphere

Civilization is part of the biosphere. Nature is not an external storehouse of resources, but a living system, on the condition of which health, economy, security and the very possibility of the future depend.

13.1. The biocenose approach

ContourAction
ObservationBiocenosis points, satellite data and civil science
Warningearly identification of sources and cascading risks
PreventionAssessment of the full life cycle of projects
Recoverysoils, waters, forests, biodiversity and urban ecosystems
Verificationindependent confirmation of the environmental result
Participationthe Rights of Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples

14. Safety of Civilization

Security is the ability to preserve dignity, sovereignty, vital functions and freedom of development in the face of threats, crises and rapid changes. It is based primarily on prevention, trust and preparedness of systems for recovery.

MeasurementFocus
Humanlife, health, rights, psychological stability
Publictrust, reduction of conflict, protection against misinformation
EconomicCritical Chains, Reserves and Mobilization Capabilities
The technologicalreliability, cybersecurity and manageability AI
Ecologicalprevention of natural and man-made cascades
Statesovereignty, rule of law and continuity of administration
PlanetaryPrevention of war and cooperation on common threats

14.1. The principle of safe development

  • Failure scenarios are designed at the same time as the success scenario.
  • Critical systems have redundancy, manual mode, and a responsible subject.
  • The society receives reliable information without creating panic and concealing the risk.
  • After the crisis, not only objects are restored, but also trust, connections and the ability to act.

15. Planetary cooperation

Planetary cooperation does not require relinquishing sovereignty and cultural identity. It is necessary where the consequences cross borders: climate, ocean, space, pandemics, nuclear and biological risks, artificial intelligence, global financial and information systems.

15.1. Architecture of cooperation

LevelMechanism
General principlesdignity, non-aggression, right of peoples to development, responsibility for transboundary harm
Joint datacompatible standards for surveillance and early warning
Missionary consortiascience, infrastructure and resources for a specific common task
Independent verificationtrust in results without the monopoly of one center
Cultural DiplomacyTranslation of meanings, education and direct links of societies
De-escalation mechanismsPermanent communication channels and conflict prevention procedures

16. Transition Management

16.1. Cycle of decision

  • Diagnostics: data, history and map of relationships.
  • Dialogue: people, experts, state, business and territories.
  • Goal setting: desired state and red lines.
  • Design: Theory of change, roles, resources, and risks.
  • Pilot: limited scale and reversible solutions.
  • Validation: independent verification of the result and consequences.
  • Scaling: adapting, learning, and updating standards.

16.2. Control contours

OrganResponsibility
The Civilizing Councilvalues, long horizon and system alignment
Scientific and Expert CouncilMethodology, scenarios and standards of evidence
Public Assemblyrepresentation of communities, rights and future generations
Project OfficeProgramme portfolio, resources and execution
Center EQUILIBRIUMmonitoring of balance sheets, risks and public result
Ombudsman of the FutureAssessment of irreversible consequences and intergenerational justice

17. Indicators of civilizational development

MeasurementExamples
Health and longevityHealthy Life Expectancy and Access to Prevention
Human developmenteducation, ability, freedom of choice and social mobility
Dignity and rightstrust in law, equality of procedures, access to protection
Trust and solidarityinterpersonal trust, mutual assistance, participation
The Creative Economyproductivity, decent work, innovation, cooperation
Natural Sustainabilityair, water, soil, biodiversity and restoration
Scientific and technological maturityresearch, implementation, security and sovereign competences
Culture and continuityparticipation, diversity, mentoring and living memory
Sustainability of systemsreserves, recovery speed, manageability of critical risks
FuturePercentage of decisions assessing intergenerational effects

18. Road map 2026–2050

StageTimeframeResult
I. Foundation2026–2028public charter; advice; methodology of indicators; registry of systems and risks; first pilots
II. Piloting2029–203313 territories; mission consortia; validation centers; digital contour EQUILIBRIUM
III. Network2034–2040interregional cooperation; new financial instruments; integration of education, science and production
IV. The civilization norm2041–2050mature institutions of long horizon; recovery economy; international missions and compatible standards

18.1. First 12 months

  • To approve the draft Charter of Dignity and Creative Development.
  • Form a cross-sectoral Civilizational Council and a scientific network.
  • Develop a roster of twenty systems and their key interdependencies.
  • Choose 13 pilot territories and conduct comprehensive diagnostics.
  • Create a single passport of a civilization project and a validation procedure.
  • Run SFERA Initiatives and the first portfolio ECO‑PPA.
  • Train 260 coordinators, mentors and experts.
  • Publish an open report with results, risks and errors.

19. Risks and guarantees

RiskWarranty
Utopianism and InaccessibilityPilots, step-by-step, verifiable targets and right of adjustment
Ideological Unificationpluralism, freedom of conscience and cultural sovereignty
SupercentralizationSubsidiarity, power sharing and local adaptation
Technocracyhuman decision, public participation and ethical expertise
Digital controldata minimization, transparent rules and right of appeal
Seizing resourcesDisclosure, Audit, Competition and Rotation
Imitation of resultstarting point, independent verification and publication of errors
Conflict of CivilizationsEquality of dignity, diplomacy and joint practical missions
Environmental damage under the guise of developmentLife cycle assessment and mandatory recovery

19.1. Red Lines

  • Dignity and basic rights cannot be sacrificed for the sake of efficiency.
  • It is impossible to create irreversible risk without proven necessity and stopping mechanisms.
  • Conflicts of interest and socially significant consequences cannot be hidden.
  • The right to culture, memory, language and the sovereign path of development must not be denied to peoples.

20. Manifesto of Civilization

1. We recognize man as the goal of development and the bearer of unconditional dignity.

2. We combine freedom with responsibility, power with right, knowledge with conscience.

3. We preserve the diversity of peoples and cultures as a source of mutual enrichment.

4. We return to work the meaning of skill, service and creation.

5. We direct the economy to the development of the person, society and life systems.

6. We use technology to expand capabilities and do not transfer human responsibility to the machine.

7. We regard nature as the living basis of our common destiny and restore what has been violated.

8. We defend sovereignty while cooperating where the fate of humanity is united.

9. We measure success not by the volume of intentions, but by the growth of dignity, trust, knowledge, beauty and vitality.

10. We take responsibility for those who have not yet been born and leave them a space of a free future.

Annex. Passport of civilization program

FieldContents
Title and MissionWhat state of the human being, society and environment must be achieved
Systemswhich of the twenty systems are affected and how they are connected
Rights and valuesWhat grounds are protected and where conflict is possible?
Baseline stateData, history, risks and exclusion groups
Theory of changeWhy actions should lead to the required state
Participants and roleswho decides, executes, finances, checks and appeals
ResourcesFinance, Infrastructure, Competence, Data and Time
RisksHarm scenarios, limits, reversibility and stopping mechanism
Indicatorsactivities, immediate result, impact and sustainability
Validationindependent verification and publication of the result
ContinuityWhat is left for people and territories after the program
Scalingtransfer conditions and elements requiring local adaptation

The control question

Other published edition: CIVILIZATION Civilization.pptx · web text +

The doctrine of human development, social cooperation and a harmonious future

HUMANITY

NATURE

FUTURE

The scale of opportunities is equal to the scale of responsibility

Technology accelerates development — and at the same time increases the cost of error.

Technological power

weakness of institutions

Global connectivity

Lack of trust

Increase in production

Limits of Biosphere

Information Abundance

Lack of meaning

Civilization connects the seven layers of development

Themes

Objectives and values

Time

Person

Continuity of generations

Health and Freedom

LIVE

SYSTEM

Nature

Culture

Biosphere and Resources

memory and norms

Science

Institutions

knowledge and technology

Law and Administration

The future is defined by seven qualities

Human-centeredness

Evidence

Man is the goal

Facts and verification

Fairness

Eco-friendly

Equal rules

Recovery of life

Creativity

Long-term

Value Instead of Damage

the Generations Horizon

Co-operation

Not a single center for the governance of the world, but compatible principles of cooperation while preserving sovereignty and identity.

General business

Value code keeps development within human boundaries

Dignity

Life

Freedom

Truth

Fairness

Solidarity

Creation

Measure

Diversity

Continuity

Beauty

Care

Man of civilization combines freedom and responsibility

Self-determination

Critical Thinking

Empathy

understands the calling

Distinguish between fact and interest

See the dignity of another

Creation

Cooperation

Self-regulation

Turns ideas into results

He speaks and keeps his word

Manages attention

Environmental ownership

Civic maturity

The Long Horizon

See the connection with the biosphere

participates in the general case

Consider the future

13 Principles of Civilization

Man is a goal

Openness

The right above arbitrary

Cooperation

Freedom and responsibility

Recovery

Unity in diversity

Continuity

Subsidiarity

Fair access

Evidence

The Long Horizon

Caution

20 systems form a single device

Man and family

Education

Science

Culture

Health care

Work

Economy

Finance

Entrepreneurship

Right

Public administration

Social cooperation

Nature and biocenoses

Energy

Food and water

Cities and territories

Information and Media

Digital environment and AI

Security

Planetary cooperation

EQUILIBRIUM combines design and proven result

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

ECO‑PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

observation, forecast, balance

Initiatives and Cooperation

resources for the result

Contour Execution

Monitoring → Initiative → Expertise → resource → Pilot → Validation → Scaling

A strong state serves a right and a long horizon

Legal

Strategic

Equality and predictability

objectives and infrastructure

Social

Evolving

Basic capabilities

Science and Initiative

Environmental

International

System Restore

sovereignty and cooperation

The state does not replace society • Businesses don’t buy the rules • The digital system does not replace the human

The economy of creation develops five capitals

Human

Social

Production

Natural

Smyslova

Health and ability

Trust and Connections

Technology and infrastructure

Ecosystems and Resources

Memory and image of the future

The result is estimated not only by income, but also by the quality of a person, society, nature and the future.

The technology is acceptable when the benefit is compatible with the liability

Research

Design

Test

Opportunities and risks

whose values are embedded

Safety and Limits

Implementation

Operation

Completion

Who answers and stops.

Monitoring of consequences

Safe system withdrawal

AI expands the possibilities - but human responsibility is not delegated to the machine.

Culture and education pass on civilization between generations

Family

School

language, trust, play

Thinking and cooperation

Vocational education

University

Skill and Work

Research and Freedom

Mentoring

Public culture

Experience and practical wisdom

memory, creativity, participation

Biocenosis approach returns a person a place in the living system

Atmosphere

Water

Soil

Plants

Animals

Person

Surveillance → Warning → Prevention → Recovery → Independent Verification

Safety begins with prevention and the ability to recover

Person

Ecology

life, health, rights

Cascade Warning

Society

State

Trust and Sustainability

sovereignty and continuity

Economy

Planet

Chains and Reserves

Prevention of war

Technology

Reliability and cyber protection

Cooperation begins where consequences cross borders

Climate and Ocean

Pandemics

AI and biorisks

Space

Nuclear safety

Financial systems

Sovereignty stored • data become compatible • results verified independently

The transition goes through seven steps of verification

Diagnostics

Dialogue

Goal

Design

Pilot

Validation

Scaling

The pilot is reversible. Scaling begins only after independent verification of the result and consequences.

Development is measured simultaneously in ten dimensions

Health

Human development

Dignity and rights

Trust

The Creative Economy

Natural Sustainability

Technological maturity

Culture and continuity

Sustainability of systems

Future

The transition to civilizational norm is calculated up to 2050

2026–2028

2029–2033

2034–2040

2041–2050

BASIC

PILOT

NETWORKING

NORMA

Charter • Council • Pilots

13 Territories • Validation

Cooperation of systems

Restructuring economy

The first result is long horizon institutions and verifiable full life cycle programs.

Turning Power into Responsibility

MANIFESTATION OF CIVILIZATION

The difference is in the dialogue.

Knowledge is in creation.

The future is in everyday practice.

JUSTICE • LAW • CREATION • FUTURE

EQUILIBRIUM • Civilization • 2026

Published files

Platform · Full published text

16 KON Principles

Source Status: Primary Document

EQUILIBRIUM ETHICAL ARCHITECTURE

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/16-konov-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

From the internal balance of man to the coordinated development of society, nature and civilization

Extended and methodologically refined edition

EQUILIBRIUM • 2026

Annotation

“16 KON Principles” is a philosophical and ethical model describing enduring principles for the development of individuals, relationships, organisations and social systems. In this edition, the original text has been transformed into a coherent EQUILIBRIUM concept: each KON principle has been given a clear definition, limits of applicability, a practical mechanism, a risk and a measurable result.

The main formula

Awareness → choice → action → consequence → feedback → improvement

In EQUILIBRIUM, a horse is understood as a reference point that helps to reconcile intention and action with life, human dignity, the public good, and the limits of natural systems. Cohn does not abolish freedom: he makes freedom responsible.

What has been corrected and strengthened

  • Repetitions, language errors and categorical formulations that are not confirmed by scientific data are removed;
  • Metaphysical ideas are designated as world-view interpretations, not as established facts.
  • The concepts of karma, reincarnation, the materiality of thought and energy have been translated into the correct philosophical and practical context.
  • The logic of domination is eliminated: the influence of the strong is replaced by responsible leadership and the protection of individual autonomy;
  • each horse received application practices and verifiable signs of result;
  • formed a connection with the contours EQUILIBRIUM: man, community, project, institute, biocenosis and civilization.

1. Purpose of the 16 KON Principles system

The modern world faces not only a lack of resources, but also a lack of coherence. Technology accelerates actions faster than society can comprehend their consequences. Therefore, the EQUILIBRIUM system does not need a set of slogans, but an internal decision-making code applicable from personal choice to an interstate program.

The 16 KON Principles form such a code. They connect four levels: source and identity; free choice and creation; causality and feedback; exchange, gratitude and renewal. Together, they form a cycle of sustainable development in which the system can remember, choose, act, learn and renew itself.

The Four Quadrants

QuadrantKON principlesThe main questionResult
I. Foundation1–4Who are we and what are we acting for?Identity and Creative Design
II. Connectivity5–8How are actions included in the network of relationships and consequences?Responsibility and feedback
III. Implementation9–12How does purpose become sustainable?Competence, influence and resource discipline
IV. Circulation13–16How does the system exchange, learn and update?Reciprocity, Gratitude, Gratitude and Transition

Application levels

LevelObject of equilibriumExample of solution
Identityvalues, will, health, attentionSelection of activities without self-destruction
Family and communitytrust, reciprocity, bordersDistribution of responsibilities and concerns
Project and organizationmission, resources, consequencesexamination of the project before scaling
Staterights, security, developmentsolution with feedback and public responsibility
Biocenosisload limits and recoveryMonitoring of impact and regeneration
CivilizationLong-term compatibility of systemsCooperation without suppression of differences

2. Canon of Interpretation

To ensure that the 16 KON principles do not become an arbitrary esoteric scheme, EQUILIBRIUM applies a unified method of interpretation to them.

  1. First, the moral core of the principle is defined.
  2. The metaphor is then separated from the testable statement.
  3. The principle is then translated into action or management rule.
  4. Restrictions are set for action: human rights, the rule of law, non-violence, scientific integrity and environmental limits.
  5. The result is assessed by the observed effects and feedback.
  6. In the case of horse conflict, the principle of minimizing irreversible harm and preserving the dignity of the individual is applied.

3. Sixteen Horses: Extended Edition

Each con is disclosed in seven elements: meaning, principle, practice, risk, metric, and system function. This structure makes the philosophy suitable for education, management and project expertise.

01 • KON

CONTINUITY AND IMPROVEMENT

We inherit biological, cultural, family and institutional conditions, but are not obliged to mechanically repeat the past. Continuity becomes creative when experience is preserved, tested, and improved.

Practice

Create a heritage map: knowledge, strengths, injuries, mistakes, unfinished commitments. For each element, define whether to save, rethink, complete, or convert.

Border and risk of distortion

Blind justification by tradition; mythologization of origin; transfer of responsibility to ancestors.

Results signs

Share of decisions based on lessons learned; availability of knowledge register; reduction of repeatability of errors.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

The memory circuit EQUILIBRIUM: archive of decisions, origin of data, intergenerational transfer of competencies.

Question for self-examination

What legacy do I keep and what do I consciously transform?

02 • KON

THE WILL AND THE MORAL CHOICE

Will is the ability to hold on to a chosen direction by relating momentum, values, and consequences. It does not equal rigidity and does not justify the suppression of another.

Practice

Before an important action, answer: what I want; who it will benefit or harm; whether I am ready to be responsible for the consequences; which will help bring the decision to fruition.

Border and risk of distortion

Self-violence, the cult of power, the accusation of a vulnerable person of "willlessness."

Results signs

Fulfillment of voluntary commitments; stability of focus; ability to adjust the course without abandoning the goal.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

The contour of subjectivity: personal obligations, transparent roles, the right to deliberate refusal.

Question for self-examination

Am I acting out of a clear choice or out of impulse and pressure?

03 • KON

PART AND WHOLE COST

Humans are part of large systems and carry their cultural and biological footprints. The similarity of the part and the whole is a fruitful metaphor for systemic connectedness, but not proof of their complete identity.

Practice

For the project to build a map: people → team → organization → territory → biocenosis → society. Identify direct and indirect effects.

Border and risk of distortion

False analogies; conclusions about the universe only by the similarity of images of neural and cosmic networks.

Results signs

Number of relationships taken into account; reduction of unforeseen external effects; completeness of the system map.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

Hypergraph EQUILIBRIUM: nodes, connections, dependencies, and cascade effects.

Question for self-examination

What consequences of my decision will arise outside the visible object?

04 • KON

CREATION

Creation is the production of value that supports life, dignity, knowledge, beauty, mutual trust and the ability of systems to develop. In EQUILIBRIUM, a person acts as the creator responsible for the quality of his contribution.

Practice

Formulate the value created, recipients, benefit criteria, side effects, and a way to correct the damage.

Border and risk of distortion

Romanticization of any actions as “creativity”; good intentions without evaluation of the result.

Results signs

Proven utility; satisfaction of recipients; no or compensation for harm.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

Outline of initiatives SFERA: Design → Expertise → Co-operation → Pilot → Confirmed result → Scaling.

Question for self-examination

What verifiable value does my action create?

05 • KON

TYPES AND ENVIRONMENT

People tend to come together based on shared interests, attitudes, and behaviors. At the same time, the environment is not formed by mystical “attraction”, but by choice, algorithms, social conditions and available opportunities.

Practice

Conduct an audit of the environment and the information diet: what increases clarity, competence and goodwill, and what is fear, dependence and hostility.

Border and risk of distortion

Accusation of a person that he has “drawn” violence, disease or poverty; information bubbles.

Results signs

A variety of reliable contacts; the quality of information sources; the level of psychological safety.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

The contour of communities: recommendatory mechanisms with protection against radicalization and closed bubbles.

Question for self-examination

How does my environment change me — and what do I bring into it?

06 • KON

RESONANCE AND TRANSFORMATION

Any information elicits an emotional, cognitive, or behavioral response. Maturity is not to pass a destructive impulse on, but to transform it into an understanding, a boundary, or a constructive action.

Practice

PAUSE protocol: receive signal → assess the status → See the facts → set a border → Respond without multiplying the harm.

Border and risk of distortion

Suppression of emotions; tolerance of violence under the guise of “transformation of evil”.

Results signs

Reduction of escalations; speed of recovery from conflicts; share of conflicts with agreed solution.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

Early warning and mediation circuit EQUILIBRIUM.

Question for self-examination

Does my response stop the destructive chain or strengthen it?

07 • KON

LONG LIFE HORIZON

The idea of reincarnation belongs to religious and philosophical traditions and is not a scientifically established fact. The universal practical core of the horse is to make decisions beyond short-term benefits and to take future generations into account.

Practice

Check solution in the horizons: today, year, generation, 50 years. Separately assess the reversibility of the consequences.

Border and risk of distortion

Imposing beliefs; devaluing current life for the sake of a hypothetical future incarnation.

Results signs

Share of long-term indicators; intergenerational equity; risk reversibility.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

The Civilization Horizon EQUILIBRIUM and Scenario Planning.

Question for self-examination

Will this be acceptable to those who come after us?

08 • KON

REASON AND RESPONSIBILITY

Karma is interpreted here as an ethical-philosophical image of causes and consequences, and not a mechanism for accusing the victim. Complex events have many causes, including chance, environment, decisions of other people, and the organization of institutions.

Practice

Make a map of the causes: my actions, the actions of others, system conditions, random factors. Define the area of control, influence and acceptance.

Border and risk of distortion

The phrase "it's your own fault"; ignoring structural violence and unpredictability.

Results signs

Quality of analysis of the root causes; implementation of corrective measures; reduction of repeated incidents.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

The scope of audit of the consequences and traceability of decisions.

Question for self-examination

What is my real contribution to causes and what is beyond my control?

09 • KON

COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRESENTATION

Purpose is understood not as a predetermined destiny, but as a dynamic correspondence of abilities, values, needs of the world and mature responsibility.

Practice

The matrix of four questions: what matters to me; what I know; what I am willing to learn; what real need exists.

Border and risk of distortion

Fatalism; pressure from family or organization; excuse for lack of competence by "invocation".

Results signs

Growth of skills; sustainable participation; confirmed social value of activities.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

Roles and Competences SFERA / SPECZASHCHITA.

Question for self-examination

Where do my abilities, responsibilities, and the need for peace meet?

10 • KON

WORLD OF THINGS AND ATTENTION

Thoughts affect perception, emotions and behavior, but do not materialize events directly at one desire. Attention management is the ability to notice thoughts, test them, and choose an action.

Practice

Fix: Event → automatic thought → Emotion → Facts for and against → More precise wording → Action.

Border and risk of distortion

Magical thinking; guilt for illness or unhappiness due to "wrong thoughts"; refusal of medical care.

Results signs

Reduced cognitive bias; quality of decisions; compliance with the recovery regime and specialist assistance.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

The contours of cognitive hygiene, education and data culture.

Question for self-examination

What facts confirm my thought and what action is reasonable?

11 • KON

MAGNETISM AND RESPONSIBLE LEADERSHIP

Influence arises from trust, competence, status, communication, and the ability to bring people together. Strong influence imposes increased responsibility and does not give the right to rule the masses without their consent.

Practice

Before seeking to influence the public, disclose the purpose, interest, evidence, risks and the audience’s right to disagree.

Border and risk of distortion

Cult of personality; manipulation; exploitation of vulnerability; substitution of authority with evidence.

Results signs

Trust; transparency of decisions; distribution of leadership; availability of feedback mechanisms and revocation of authority.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

Outline of legitimacy and public participation EQUILIBRIUM.

Question for self-examination

After my leadership, do people get stronger and freer?

12 • KON

PROTECTION AND TRANSFORMATION OF RESOURCES

The physical law of conservation of energy cannot be directly transferred to emotions, money, or information. In a managerial sense, the con requires taking into account the sources, losses, conversion and restoration of resources.

Practice

Balance time, attention, materials, energy, finance and environmental impact. For deficiency, determine recovery or replacement.

Border and risk of distortion

Pseudoscientific use of the word "energy"; exploitation of people as a renewable resource.

Results signs

Resource intensity of the result; recovery rate; waste reduction; absence of chronic burnout.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

Live Balance EQUILIBRIUM and resource contour ECO‑PPA.

Question for self-examination

What resources are being spent and how will they be recovered?

13 • KON

EXCHANGE AND RECIPROCITY

Viable systems exist through the exchange of matter, energy, information, labor, care, and trust. Fair exchange takes into account the contribution, need, voluntariness and asymmetry of power.

Practice

For each exchange, check: voluntary, clarity of conditions, equivalence or justified solidarity, the possibility of exit and resource recovery.

Border and risk of distortion

Hidden exploitation; demand for immediate reciprocity; turning care into debt.

Results signs

Balance of contributions and benefits; accessibility; low level of conflicts on the terms of exchange.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

Co-operation and financial contour SPECZASHCHITA / MURDE / EUT.

Question for self-examination

Does sharing preserve the dignity and vitality of all parties?

14 • KON

THANKS AND LEARNING

Gratitude helps to notice the support and meaning, but does not require to call the harm "good". Mature gratitude is compatible with grief, anger, boundaries, and the demand for justice.

Practice

Weekly fixation: what supported; whose contribution is important; what the difficulty has taught; what correction is necessary.

Border and risk of distortion

Toxic positivity; coercion of the victim to gratitude; denial of justice.

Results signs

Culture of recognition; retention of participants; speed of learning; implementation of restorative measures.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

The outline of public recognition and the register of deposits.

Question for self-examination

What deserves recognition, and what needs correction?

15 • KON

GIVING AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS

Giving is the voluntary direction of time, knowledge, means or concern for the development of others and the common good. It does not guarantee personal rewards and must consider its own boundaries.

Practice

Determine the available volume of contribution, the criterion of benefit, the transparency of use and the way of developing the independence of the recipient.

Border and risk of distortion

Self-exhaustion; demonstrative charity; control through help; promise of guaranteed "return."

Results signs

Confirmed effect; transparency; growth of independence; sustainability of participation.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

Grant conveyor SFERA and public impact programs.

Question for self-examination

Does my help create opportunities or dependency?

16 • KON

REPLACEMENT, TRANSITION AND UPDATE

Living systems retain their identity through updating components and behaviors. The transition requires not passive acceptance of everything new, but a distinction: what to complete, what to preserve and what to experience.

Practice

Transition Protocol: Accept Completion → Preserve valuable → Close the Obligations → Test the new → Evaluate the consequences → Fixing a working model.

Border and risk of distortion

Cult of novelty; destruction of institutions without replacement; renunciation of obligations under the guise of "letting go".

Results signs

Speed of safe adaptation; share of completed commitments; safety of critical functions.

Integration into EQUILIBRIUM

Transition control and scaling circuit EQUILIBRIUM.

Question for self-examination

What to finish, what to save and what to experience before scaling?

4. Matrix 16 × 6

The matrix is used to assess initiatives. Each KON principle is scored from 0 to 3: 0—the principle is not taken into account; 1—it is declared; 2—it is supported by a mechanism; 3—it is confirmed by data and feedback. The overall score does not replace professional assessment; it indicates areas that need attention.

CohnPersonSocietyProjectInstituteNatureFuture
1. Continuity and improvement□□□□□□
2. Will and moral choice□□□□□□
3. The identity of the part and the whole□□□□□□
4. Creation□□□□□□
5. Similarity and Wednesday□□□□□□
6. Resonance and transformation□□□□□□
7. Long horizon of life□□□□□□
8. Causality and responsibility□□□□□□
9. Conformity to purpose□□□□□□
10. World of Thought and Attention□□□□□□
11. Magnetism and Responsible Leadership□□□□□□
12. Conservation and conversion of resources□□□□□□
13. Exchange and reciprocity□□□□□□
14. Gratitude and Learning□□□□□□
15. Impact and social contribution□□□□□□
16. Replace, upgrade and upgrade□□□□□□

Scale: 0 - absent; 1 - declaration; 2 - mechanism; 3 - confirmed result.

5. Management cycle EQUILIBRIUM

  1. Intended. Horses 1–4 determine the origin, subjectivity, system scale and value created.
  2. Examination. Horses 5–8 analyze the environment, reaction, long horizon and cause-effect relationships.
  3. Implementation. Horses 9–12 connect role, attention, leadership and resource balance.
  4. Cooperation. Horses 13–15 set fair exchange, recognition and public contribution.
  5. Transition. Con 16 provides cycle completion, update and transition to the next level.
  6. Feedback. The results return to the continuity as a new layer of shared memory.

6. Coherence index 16K

The consistency index 16K can be used for internal navigation. It is not a rating of a person’s value. It is a tool for assessing the maturity of a decision or project.

ComponentWeightWhich confirms
Base: horses 1–425%mission clarity, subjectivity, consistency, value creation
Connection: horses 5–825%Analysis of the environment, conflicts, long-term consequences and causes
Realization: horses 9–1225%competence, quality of decisions, legitimacy, resource balance
Circulation: Horses 13–1625%fair exchange, recognition, contribution and updating

The index is calculated as the weighted average of the confirmed estimates. Red Zone: the presence of at least one critical violation of rights, safety or environmental limits, regardless of the total amount.

7. Implementation practices

For the person

  • weekly reflection on the four horses of the current quadrant;
  • Diary of decisions and consequences;
  • Personal balance of resources and recovery;
  • Checking significant decisions in the long horizon.

For team and organization

  • 16K-check-list before the initiative launch;
  • retrospective of the reasons and lessons after each stage;
  • public disclosure of interests and risks;
  • mechanism of safe feedback and review of the decision.

For territory and biocenosis

  • Map of stakeholders and natural links;
  • initial data before the intervention;
  • Load and early warning thresholds;
  • Recovery plan and long-term monitoring.

8. Ethical restrictions

  • No horse can justify violence, discrimination, exploitation or deprivation of human subjectivity.
  • Metaphysical beliefs do not replace medicine, law, engineering safety and scientific expertise.
  • You can not blame the victim with references to karma, thoughts, lack of will or the "attraction" of events.
  • Strong influence requires transparency, consent, control of authority, and the right to dissent.
  • The environmental good must be confirmed by measurement, not symbolic language.
  • In case of uncertainty, reversible solutions, pilots and the protection of vulnerable parties receive priority.

9. Educational Module “16 KON Principles”

ModuleFormatResult
Introduction2 hours: meaning, status, model boundariesthe participant distinguishes between metaphor, value and verifiable fact
The Four Quadrants4 lessons by 90 minutesthe participant applies the cycle to the personal and project decision
WorkshopDisassembly of one real caseMap of consequences and corrective measures
Project laboratory4–6 weeksThe initiative is evaluated 16K and the pilot
Certification of practicePortfolio and Case ProtectionThe ability to apply the method without dogmatism is confirmed

10. Manifesto of the 16 KON Principles of EQUILIBRIUM

01 We accept heritage, but choose improvement.

02 We affirm the will as responsible freedom.

03 We see the part as a whole and the whole in the consequences of each part.

04 We create value that supports life and dignity.

05 We consciously shape the environment and do not blame a person for what happened to him.

06 We are ending the chains of destruction and transforming conflict into clarity and boundaries.

07 We act in the horizon of future generations.

08 We are responsible for our contribution to causes without arrogating to ourselves power over everything.

09 We connect abilities with the needs of the world.

10 We test thoughts with facts and turn attention into conscious action.

11 We understand leadership as serving the subjectivity of others.

12 We take into account the cost of resources and provide recovery.

13 We are building a fair, voluntary and viable exchange.

14 We thank you for your support, learn lessons and do not justify harm.

15 We give in such a way as to strengthen independence and the common good.

16 We complete with dignity, keep valuable and update responsibly.

Conclusion

The 16 KON Principles of EQUILIBRIUM provide a language for bringing the inner and outer worlds into alignment. Their value lies not in a claim to absolute antiquity or universal infallibility, but in their ability to direct attention towards memory, freedom, connectedness, consequences, fair exchange and renewal.

The system becomes alive only when it is tested by action. Therefore, the main criterion of each horse is not the beauty of the formulation, but the quality of relationships, the sustainability of projects, the restoration of nature, the dignity of man and the ability of society to learn without repeating destructive mistakes.

Annex. Source and drafting reservation

The original user file “16 конов.docx” contains a brief retelling of the publication “16 KON Principles of the Universe: What It Means to Live by a KON Principle” and the link https://bloknot.ru/obshhestvo/16-konov-mirozdaniya-chto-znachit-zhit-po-konu-1070135.html. The publicly available source text provides no academic attribution for a unified historical corpus of 16 KON principles. This edition therefore makes no claim that the list is ancient or has a generally recognised canonical status, and treats it as a modern philosophical and ethical composition.

William Blake's quote from the source is not reproduced in full: her idea is conveyed as a metaphor for the connection of part and whole. All new formulations, matrices, indicators and integrations in EQUILIBRIUM are the result of conceptual rework.

Another published edition: 16 KON PRINCIPLES 16_конов_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_презентация.pptx · web text +

Ethical architecture EQUILIBRIUM

From the inner balance of man -

to the coordinated development of society, nature and civilization

EQUILIBRIUM • 2026

The world lacks coherence.

Technology accelerates action faster than society comprehends consequences

MEMORY

CHOICE

ACTION

IMPLICATIONS

The 16 KON Principles create a shared language that helps individuals, projects and institutions remember their origins, choose responsibly, see connections and learn from results.

This is a modern philosophical and ethical model.

Not a religious dogma, not a legal code, and not a proof of an ancient unified body.

SAVED

CONTINUE

The Moral Core

Metaphorical language

Spiritual experience

Freedom of the World

Boundaries of Evidence

Human rights and dignity

Verifiable consequences

Practice and indicators

Metaphysics is not a substitute for science, law, medicine and engineering safety.

Sixteen horses form four quadrants.

Each Quadrant Answers Its Own Development Question

BASIC

RELATIONSHIP

01—04

05—08

Who are we and what are we acting for?

How are we involved in relationships and consequences?

IMPLEMENTATION

Circulation

09—12

13—16

How does design become sustainable?

How is the system exchanged and updated?

EQUILIBRIUM turns horses into a management cycle

The result of each cycle is returned to the general memory

9–12

13–15

ZAMYSEL

EXPERTISE

IMPLEMENTATION

COOPERATION

TRANSITION

Awareness → choice → action → consequence → feedback → improvement

01 Continuity and improvement

BASIC

Heritage is material for meaningful continuation, not judgment.

PRACTICE

Save Valuable • Rethink Errors • Transfer Knowledge

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Cult of the past and transfer of responsibility to ancestors

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Memory circuit and decision archive

QUESTION FOR ACTION

What to save and what to convert?

02 Will and moral choice

BASIC

Freedom is the ability to choose responsibility.

PRACTICE

Intention • consequences • obligation • course correction

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

The cult of power and the accusation of the vulnerable in the "willlessness"

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Outline of subjectivity and transparent roles

QUESTION FOR ACTION

Do I choose or obey the impulse?

03 The identity of a part and a whole

BASIC

The decision at one level is checked by the impact on other levels.

PRACTICE

Human → team → territory → biocenosis → society

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

False analogies and substitution of evidence by similarity

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Hypergraph Connections and Cascading Effects

QUESTION FOR ACTION

What will change outside the facility?

04 Creation

BASIC

The value of an action is determined by the intention and the real consequence.

PRACTICE

Use • Recipients • Side Effects • Harm Correction

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Good intentions without a confirmed result

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA: from design to scaling

QUESTION FOR ACTION

What value will confirm the result?

05 Similarity and environment

RELATIONSHIP

We simultaneously choose the environment and shape it by behavior.

PRACTICE

Audit of the environment • Information Hygiene • Diversity of connections

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Accusation of a person that he "pulled" trouble

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Community contours and bubble protection

QUESTION FOR ACTION

How does Wednesday change us?

06 Resonance and transformation

RELATIONSHIP

The pause between impact and response creates a space of freedom.

PRACTICE

Accept Signal • Rate • see facts • set boundary

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Suppression of emotions and tolerance of violence

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Early Warning and Mediation

QUESTION FOR ACTION

Does the answer stop the destruction?

07 Long horizon of life

RELATIONSHIP

Solutions must remain acceptable to future generations.

PRACTICE

Today • year • generation • 50 years • years

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Imposing beliefs and devaluing current life

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Scenario and intergenerational planning

QUESTION FOR ACTION

What will happen to future generations?

08 Causality and Responsibility

RELATIONSHIP

We are responsible for our contribution, but we do not control everything that happens.

PRACTICE

My actions • other • system • accident

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Accusing the victim and ignoring the environment

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Audit of the root causes and corrective measures

QUESTION FOR ACTION

What is my real contribution to the causes?

09 Conformity to purpose

IMPLEMENTATION

Talent becomes the way to go when it becomes useful competence.

PRACTICE

Values • Ability • Learning • Peace Need

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Fatalism and the justification of incompetence by “invocation”

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Roles and Competences

QUESTION FOR ACTION

Where does talent meet need?

10 Thoughts and attention

IMPLEMENTATION

Not every thought is true; not every emotion requires action.

PRACTICE

Event • Thought • Facts • exact wording • Action

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Magical Thinking and Refusal of Professional Help

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Data Culture and Cognitive Hygiene

QUESTION FOR ACTION

What facts confirm the idea?

11 Magnetism and responsible leadership

IMPLEMENTATION

Leadership reinforces the subjectivity of others, not subordinates it.

PRACTICE

Objective • Interest • Evidence • Risk • Right to disagree

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Cult of personality, manipulation and power without control

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Legitimacy and public participation

QUESTION FOR ACTION

Do people get stronger after leadership?

12 Conservation and conversion of resources

IMPLEMENTATION

Sustainability requires consideration of the cost of action and replenishment.

PRACTICE

Time • Attention • Materials • Energy • Finance • Nature

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Pseudoscientific language and exploitation of people as a resource

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Live balance and resource circuit ECO-PPA

QUESTION FOR ACTION

How will the resources be restored?

13 Exchange and reciprocity

Circulation

Fair exchange increases the ability of all parties to live.

PRACTICE

Voluntariness • Clarity • Reciprocity • Output Ability

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Hidden exploitation and turning care into debt

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Cooperation and financial contour

QUESTION FOR ACTION

Does the exchange preserve the dignity of the parties?

14 Gratitude and Learning

Circulation

You can appreciate the support, without calling the harm done a good.

PRACTICE

Acknowledge contribution • learn • correct consequences

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Toxic positivity and denial of justice

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Register of Contributions and Culture of Recognition

QUESTION FOR ACTION

What to recognize and what to correct?

15 Impact and public contribution

Circulation

Generosity is sustainable when it enhances independence.

PRACTICE

Deposit volume • benefit criterion • transparency • boundary

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Self-exhaustion, control through aid and dependence

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Grant conveyor SFERA

QUESTION FOR ACTION

Does help create opportunity or dependency?

16 Replacement, upgrade and upgrade

Circulation

The update retains meaning, memory, and critical functions.

PRACTICE

Complete • save • test • estimate • fix

RISK OF EXPERIENCE

Cult of novelty and destruction without viable replacement

FUNCTIONS IN EQUILIBRIUM

Transition Management and Scaling

QUESTION FOR ACTION

What to finish, save and test?

Matrix 16 × 6 The maturity of the initiative

Each horse is tested on six levels - from person to future generations.

HUMANITY

SOCIETY

PROJECT

INSTITUTE

NATURE

FUTURE

none

stated

There is a mechanism

result confirmed

Red zone: rights • Security • Environmental limits

The index 16K combines four equal components

High amount does not cover critical violation of rights or security

BASIC

RELATIONSHIP

IMPLEMENTATION

Circulation

9–12

13–16

Scaling tolerance requires mechanisms, data, and feedback — not just declarations.

Implementation starts with one real solution

The model is mastered through practice, not through memorizing the formulations

CHOOSE CASE

Project, conflict or solution

EXPLORE THE 16 KON PRINCIPLES

Seeing gaps and risks

ADD MECHANISM

Roles, data, boundaries, recovery

START THE PILOT

Measure the consequences

BACK LESSONS IN MEMORY

Update rules and scale

Manifesto of the 16 KON Principles

Eight core actions that bring the whole system together

REMEMBER THE SOURCES

CHOOSE CONSCIOUSLY

CREATE USEFUL

SEE THE COMMUNICATIONS

RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPACT

CURRENCY RESOURCES

EXCHANGE fairly

UPDATE WITHOUT LOSS OF SENSE

Philosophy becomes alive when tested by action.

EQUILIBRIUM

16K

Relationship quality • sustainability projects • nature restoration • human dignity • society's ability to learn

16 KON PRINCIPLES • ETHICAL ARCHITECTURE OF EQUILIBRIUM

Sources cited in presentation 1

  • User document: “16 KON Principles — The Ethical Architecture of EQUILIBRIUM”, 2026.

Published files

Platform · Full published text

Revival of the Earth

Source Status: Primary Document

Doctrine of the Restoration of the Biosphere, Man and Civilization

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/vozrozhdenie-zemli

Open on the site

Nature is a measure. Man is a participant.

Technology is a tool. Equilibrium is the result.

EQUILIBRIUM • 2026

Earth is not a resource, but a living system

EMERGENCY POSITION

Humanity is embedded in the biosphere and can develop steadily only if its reproductive capacity is preserved.

Recovery Circuit

NATURE

HUMANITY

The goal of the program is to restore the ability of the planet and society to reproduce life, development and peace.

CIVILIZATION

One supersystem connects meaning, resources and execution

ARCHITECTURE

EQUILIBRIUM

Principle of balance and observation

CONGLOMERATE

organizations, technologies, assets, competences

Revival of the Earth

the Unified Earth Program of Transformation

ECO‑PPA

Contracting resources and verifiable results

+ SFERA SPECZASHCHITA

coordination, cooperation and execution

The thirteen directions form a single contour.

PROGRAM PORTFOLIO

BIOSPHERE

MAN AND TERRITORIES

DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

Clean energy

Cyclic economy

Materials and industry

Water

Territories of the Future

Science and education

Soils and agricultural systems

Health and longevity

The Economics of Use

Forests and biodiversity

Culture of responsibility

Earth Monitoring

International cooperation

13-th direction connects national programs

with planetary cooperation.

The area becomes a unit of evidence recovery

PROJECT MODEL

Diagnostics

Priorities

Design

Expertise

ECO‑PPA

Pilot +

Verification

Scaling

Scaling is allowed only after independent verification of the effect.

ECO-PPA turns a public purpose into an obligation

MECHANISM OF IMPLEMENTATION

The long-term agreement links financing and payment with the delivery of the product and the confirmed impact.

What happened before the project

Base Line

What and by what date will change

Target effect

Who is responsible for the deviations

Risks

Who confirms the result

Verification

For availability, savings or effect

Payment

No base line - no "restorative" project

Conglomerate collects opportunities without absorbing participants

COOPERATIVE MODEL

A voluntary contractual ecosystem with clear roles, tolerance and responsibility.

SCIENCE

STATE

PRODUCTION

methods, examination, evidence

law, priorities, guarantees

engineering, construction, service

FINANCE

SFERA

SOCIETY

capital, risks, control

data, registers, transparency

Complicity and public interest

Management shares strategy, expertise and control

INSTITUTIONAL MODEL

STRATEGIC COUNCIL

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL COUNCIL

Priorities and criteria for admission

Evidence and safety

PROJECT OFFICE

OPERATOR ECO-PPA

portfolio, terms, resources, dependencies

Contracts and financial models

DATA CENTER

TERRITORIES + SOCIETY

basic lines, monitoring, audit

Realization and protection of public interest

The path to a planetary network begins with evidence pilots.

ROAD MAP

0–6 months

6–12 months

1–3 years

3–7 years

7–20 years

FORMATION

DESIGN

PROOF

MASSTABING

PLANETARY NETWORK

doctrine, advice, registry

3–5 Territories, feasibility studies, ECO‑PPA

Pilots and standard of verification

National programs

Compatible data and funding

Control point: the transition between stages - only after confirming the results and risks.

The first 100 days create a trust infrastructure

START PACKAGE

Charter and common terminology

Methodology of baseline and impact

Rules of participation and responsibility

specific launch result

Strategic and scientific advice

Preliminary package ECO ?PPA

specific launch result

specific launch result

Register of problems, technologies and sites

Public circuit SFERA

specific launch result

feedback and open reporting

Selection of 3–5 pilot territories

transparent matrix of criteria

Success is measured by six types of capital

RESULT SYSTEM

NATURAL

HUMAN

PRODUCTION

water • soil • biodiversity

Health • Knowledge • Safety

Resource Efficiency •

SOCIAL

FINANCIAL

INSTITUTIONAL

Trust • Participation • Availability

Viability •

Data • contracts • audit

For each indicator: unit • source • periodicity • owner • verification method • uncertainty

Protects the program from declarative

RISKS

Full life cycle + double counting ban

Greenwashing

readiness levels + stage funding

Technological Optimism

Disclosure of conditions + independent audit

Closed Finances

Voluntary + territorial councils

Loss of subjectivity

Separation of philosophy and practice

Ideologization

modularity + competition solutions

Dependence on the centre

Public Base Line + Measurable KPI + independent verification

The cosmic horizon sets ethics, the earth’s contour sets practice

FUTUROLOGICAL FRAMEWORK

INTER-STAR UNION

FEDERATION OF LIGHT

Revival of the Earth

Legal Cooperation of Sovereign Civilizations

a way of protecting life, freedom of will, peace and creation

A Proven Agenda for Change on Earth

Futurological concepts do not replace facts, law and engineering expertise.

Moving from a doctrine to a pilot program

DECISION ON STARTING

Establish the program outline "Earth Revival" as part of EQUILIBRIUM and prepare the launch package 3–5 territories.

Reviving the Earth, Reviving Man.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich • 2026

Sources cited in presentation 2

  • The Strategic Doctrine of the Earth Rebirth, edition 1.0, 2026.
  • A generated conceptual image of a reborn Earth; no external factual statements.

Published files

Platform · Full published text

Grant Pipeline

Source Status: Primary Document

Unified system of transformation of socially significant initiatives into confirmed results and scalable solutions

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/sfera-grant-conveyor

Open on the site

Initiative → Result

Platform concept · 2026

Grants lose effect between competition and scaling

SFERA · GRANT CONVEYER

Today

Separated windows

Examination without memory

Financing of the phase

The applicant reassembles the package for each fund.

Conclusions and data do not form a single project profile.

Money is given for events, not proof of results.

strong initiatives do not reach a sustainable model, and the system does not accumulate evidence

Investigation

SFERA connects all stages in one controlled cycle

SFERA · GRANT CONVEYER

Initiative

Diagnostics

Expertise

Cooperation

Resource

Pilot

Result

Scale

Each transition is a testable solution, a dataset, and the next level of project readiness.

NOT A COMPETITION, but A FLOW OF RESULTS

Eight quality gates reduce risk before issuing the next resource

SFERA · GRANT CONVEYER

Conformity

Cooperation

public task and priority

partners and execution resources

Team

Pilot

competence, role, reputation

Limited scale and control

Model

Effect

Change logic and budget

Verified result

Evidence

Circulation

metrics, data, protocol

standard, franchise, purchase, investment

One entry serves different types of initiatives

SFERA · GRANT CONVEYER

People and communities

Technologies and production

Territories and institutions

— social practices

— R&D and prototypes

— municipal projects

— culture and education

— environmental solutions

Inter-sector programs

Health and quality of life

— infrastructure and energy

Replication of standards

INITIATIVE

DECISION

PROGRAMME

Participants get a clear role and shared digital memory

SFERA · GRANT CONVEYER

Author of the initiative

Operator SFERA

Expert Pool

formulates a task, assembles a team, leads a project

routing, provides methodology and support

assesses the quality, risks and level of readiness

Partners

Funds and customers

Verifier

provide competences, capacities, data and co-financing

make decisions by stages and receive a proven portfolio

Confirms the result and readiness for scaling

The examination assesses not the beauty of the application, but the readiness for the result

SFERA · GRANT CONVEYER

Significance

The scale and severity of the problem

Justification

Causal model

Feasibility

team, partners, deadlines

Economy

budget and cost of the result

Evidence

metrics and independent verification

Scalability

Repeatability and Demand

DECISION: TO END · PILOT · FINANCE · MASSTABING

Funding follows maturity and evidence

SFERA · GRANT CONVEYER

Preparation

Prototype

Pilot

Extension

Scale

diagnostics, packaging, team

Development and testing of hypotheses

limited implementation

Effect Confirmation

order, investment, replication

Grant · Subsidy · Corporate Order · Donation · Refundable Funding · Investment

Sources

Digital platform makes the route transparent and reproducible

SFERA · GRANT CONVEYER

Profile of Initiative

Expert office

single passport, version history, team

criteria, conflicts of interest, conclusions

Application Designer

Outline of result

Data - different forms of funding

metrics, documents, pilot data

Router

Portfolio of solutions

suitable track, fund, expert and partner

Search, comparison, purchase and scaling

The system is controlled by speed, quality and social effect

SFERA · GRANT CONVEYER

≤ 10 days

100%

Primary Diagnostics

solutions with a digital footprint

by stages

1 Register

Funding after confirmation

Results and Scalable Practices

Target values are specified after the basic diagnosis of the pilot portfolio.

Pilot checks the entire chain on a real portfolio in 180 days

SFERA · GRANT CONVEYER

0–30

31–60

61–120

121–180

Configure

Set

Expertise and Pilots

Verification

operator, regulations, criteria, digital circuit

selection of initiatives and formation of project dossiers

cooperation, financing, launch

effects assessment and scaling decision

PILOT RESULT: REGULATION + PLATFORM + PORTFOLIO + PROVEN CASES

Trust provides roles and open rules

SFERA · GRANT CONVEYER

Strategic Council

Controller

Expert Commissions

Risk Priorities and Limits

process, data, service to applicants

meaningful decisions

Finance Committee

Independent verification

Public transparency

Stages and conditions of resource provision

confirmation of results

the Decision Registry and Feedback

Start a stream, not another contest

SFERA

INITIATIVE

↓

RESULT

↓

MASSHTAB

Solution to start

1. Approve operator and pilot outline

2. Agree on criteria and regulations

3. Building the first portfolio of initiatives

4. Launch 180-day pilot

SFERA: A Common Space of Initiatives for a Common Future

Published files

Platform · Full published text

Unified Standardised Technologies

Source Status: Primary Document

EUT — a universal architecture for turning knowledge, resources and decisions into verifiable, compatible and scalable results

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/eut-edinye-unifitsirovannye-tekhnologii

Open on the site

Architecture: EQUILIBRIUM - SFERA - ECO - PPA - SPECZASHCHITA
23 August 2026

Passport document

ParameterContents
NameUnified technologies (EUT)
StatusStrategic concept and framework architecture version 1.0
PurposeCreation of a common language and a reproducible system of transition from design to confirmed result
Application levelsProject • organization • industry • region • state • international cooperation
CoreUniversal laws of systems, unified data, digital models, standards of evidence and life cycle management contour
Author's systemEQUILIBRIUM / SOKOL EQUILIBRIS
Legal statusConceptual document; specific solutions require scientific, technical, financial and legal verification

Annotation

EUT is a meta-technological platform that combines scientific knowledge, engineering methods, digital models, standards, regulations, financial mechanisms and cooperation. Its task is to make heterogeneous solutions comparable, compatible and manageable throughout the life cycle: from problem setting and modeling to piloting, independent validation, operation and scaling.

The concept does not replace industry technologies. It provides a suprasystem framework in which each technology receives a single passport, evidence base, impact indicators, data exchange interfaces, security rules and implementation route.

Key result

Contents

  • 1. Summary for decision
  • 2. Grounds and problems
  • 3. Definition and boundaries of the EUT
  • 4. Universal principles
  • 5. EUT Architecture
  • 6. Technological contours
  • 7. Single passport of technology
  • 8. Life Cycle and Evidence
  • 9. Integration with the ecosystem
  • 10. Governance, ethics and security
  • 11. Economic and financial model
  • 12. International Positioning
  • 13. Road map 2026–2035
  • 14. Pilot program
  • 15. System of indicators
  • 16. Risks and management measures
  • 17. Draft declaration
  • 18. Conclusion and annexes

1. Summary for decision

The world has a huge number of technologies, but lacks compatibility, trust and the ability to system scale. The ECU responds to this gap: it creates a single cycle in which the problem is described through measurable parameters, the solution is modeled, verified, standardized and allowed for use on the basis of evidence.

Five solutions introduced by the EUT

  • A common language for describing technologies, projects, effects, and risks.
  • A single digital passport solution with versionality and data origin.
  • A single evidence chain from hypothesis to confirmed result.
  • Modular compatibility of solutions through open interfaces and registries.
  • Scaling management through collaboration, funding and impact control.

Proposed management solution

2. Grounds and problems

2.1. System gap

Science, public administration, industry, finance, and society use different classifiers, planning horizons, and success criteria. Because of this, data is not connected, effects are difficult to prove, and strong decisions remain local. At the same time, climatic, biological, infrastructural, social and technological risks are growing, requiring concerted action by many participants.

2.2. Model limitations of the existing model

LimitationConsequenceEUT response
Fragmentation of dataRepeated measurements and incompatible conclusionsCommon semantics and origin of data
The gap between science and implementationPilots are not operational.Life cycle with a gate of readiness
Weak evidence of effectDistrust of investors and societyIndependent validation and evidence register
Closed technological contoursHigh dependence on the supplierModularity, portability and open interfaces
Evaluation of financial results onlyHidden environmental and social costsMulti-contour valuation and impact assessment

2.3. Object of unification

  • concepts, classifiers, units and metadata;
  • processes of problem setting, design, testing and operation;
  • requirements for safety, ethics, transparency and responsibility;
  • performance, sustainability and social impact indicators;
  • data exchange interfaces and intersystem compatibility rules;
  • methods of financing, insurance, verification and scaling.

3. Definition and boundaries of the EUT

3.1. What is included in EUT

  • ontology of objects, processes, impacts and participants;
  • registers of problems, solutions, technologies, competencies and evidence;
  • digital twins and scenario modeling;
  • unified technology cards and passports;
  • methods for assessing maturity, risk and integral effect;
  • contours of monitoring, feedback and corrective actions;
  • Institutional mechanisms for cooperation and conflict resolution.

3.2. What the EU is not

The EUT is not one universal machine, a closed ideology, a substitute for science, industry regulation or national sovereignty. It does not guarantee results without testing. The EUT creates a verifiable environment of harmonization and joint action, while preserving the diversity of industries, cultures and legal systems.

3.3. Levels of unification

LevelObjectResult
SmyslovaObjectives, values, definitionsUnambiguous understanding of the task
InformationData, metadata, modelsComparability and traceability
ProcessRoles, stages, control pointsPerformance reproducibility
TechnicalInterfaces, protocols, modulesCompatibility of systems
EvidentiaryMetrics, tests, validationConfidence in the result
InstitutionalRights, responsibilities, financingLegal and sustainable scaling

4. Universal principles

PrincipleOperational content
IntegrityThe solution is evaluated as part of the system and by the effect on adjacent contours.
MeasurabilityEach goal is linked to a baseline, indicator, measurement method, and threshold.
ReproducibilityThe result must be repeated under specified conditions and documented assumptions.
ModularityComplex solutions are assembled from replaceable compatible modules.
TraceabilityThe origin of the data, decisions, versions and responsibilities is preserved.
Security by DesignRisks are taken into account before implementation, not after damage occurs.
Openness to protectionPublic evidence is open; personal data, IP and critical information are protected.
FeedbackOperational data continuously improve the model and regulation.
Fair distributionThe benefits, risks and responsibilities are shared transparently.
SubsidiarityThe decision is made at the minimum sufficient level of management.
Technological SovereigntyCritical functions do not depend on a single uncontrollable party.
International compatibilityNational solutions can be linked through agreed protocols.

5. EUT Architecture

The architecture is built as seven interconnected layers. The lower layers capture meaning and data; the middle layers provide modeling and execution; the upper layers form evidence, control, and scaling.

LayerContents
7. ScalingFinance, cooperation, replication, international programs
6. TrustValidation, certification, audit, evidence register
5. ManagementPortfolio, risks, decision rights, ethics and security
4. ImplementationTechnology maps, production chains, services
3. ModellingDigital twins, scenarios, optimization, forecast
2. DataObservation, quality, semantics, origin, access
1. GroundsValues, universal laws of systems, goals and limitations

5.1. Cross-cutting mechanisms

  • unified identification of objects, participants, documents and versions;
  • machine-readable access and liability policies;
  • management of configurations and changes;
  • international terminology and multilingual reference books;
  • Public dashboards and protected critical data contours.

5.2. Transformation formula

6. Technological contours

ContourPurpose
Observation and SensoryObtaining reliable data on natural, technical and social systems.
Data and knowledgeOntologies, knowledge graphs, registries, quality and management of data origins.
AI and forecastingScenario analysis, early warning, decision support, and model explanatory.
Materials Science and ProductionDigital technological maps, quality, resource efficiency, closed cycles.
EnergyBalance generation, storage, networks and demand; low-carbon and autonomous solutions.
Ecology and Biotic CommunitiesEcosystem monitoring, cause-and-effect analysis and recovery programs.
Infrastructure and TerritoriesDigital twins, object sustainability, logistics and life cycle management.
Human health and developmentPrevention, personalized trajectories and standards of development in the protection of rights.
Social cooperationSFERA initiatives, competence exchange, cooperative models and measurable societal impact.
Finance and evidentiary assetsECO-PPA, ESG-IR, project financing, insurance and the release of instruments under the confirmed effect.
Safety and resilienceEarly warning, resiliency, cyber defense and interagency coordination.
Culture and heritageDigital preservation, value origin, access and intergenerational transmission.

7. Single passport of technology

A passport is the minimum machine-readable unit of the EUT. It is created for each solution and updated throughout the life cycle.

Passport sectionMandatory content
IdentityName, version, owner, status, scope
Problem and purposeBaseline, target state, system boundaries
Scientific basisHypothesis, mechanism of action, references to research and assumptions
Technical descriptionArchitecture, composition, inputs, outputs, interfaces
ResourcesMaterials, Energy, Data, Competences, Infrastructure
EffectsEconomic, environmental, social and systemic indicators
RisksHazards, failure scenarios, limitations and controls
EvidenceTest reports, results, independent conclusions
Law and IPLicenses, patents, regulatory requirements, data rights
OperationRegulation, monitoring, maintenance, life cycle completion
ScalingConditions of replication, localization, cost and partner model

7.1. Readiness code

LevelStateTransition condition
EUT‑0IdeaProblem and system boundary identified
EUT‑1The Scientific HypothesisThe mechanism and criteria of refutation are confirmed
EUT‑2Laboratory prototypeReproducible result
EUT‑3Polygon PilotConfirmed performance in approximate conditions
EUT‑4Operational PilotProven value and manageability of risks
EUT‑5Standardized solutionApproved passport, regulations and evidence
EUT‑6Scalable technologyConfirmed economy, supply chain and localization
EUT‑7Infrastructure standardThe solution is compatible and applied in several jurisdictions

8. Life Cycle and Evidence

8.1. Nine Stages

  1. Formulation of the problem and the system boundary.
  2. Collection of the baseline and quality control of the initial data.
  3. Formation of hypotheses and alternative scenarios.
  4. Designing solutions and digital models.
  5. Laboratory or bench inspection.
  6. Pilot in a real environment with a predefined protocol.
  7. Independent validation of effect, security and economy.
  8. Standardization, financing and replication.
  9. Operational monitoring, updating or retirement.

8.2. The Evidence Chain

ElementThe control question
DataWhere do they come from, how complete and usable are they?
ModelWhat are the assumptions, uncertainties and limits of applicability?
ExperimentCan the result be repeated independently?
CausalityIs it proven that the effect is caused by the decision?
ImpactWho benefits and who bears the cost?
EconomyIs the result saved when scaling?
SecurityWhat residual risks remain and who manages them?
VersionWhat changes have affected the outcome?

8.3. The principle of independence

The developer forms evidence, the operator confirms the performance characteristics, and the independent validation body checks the method, data and the claimed effect. Conflicts of interest are disclosed; negative results are kept in the register on a par with positive ones.

9. Integration with the ecosystem

ComponentRole in EUTMain product
EQUILIBRIUMObservation, forecasting, digital twins and controlStatus picture, scenarios, risk signals
SFERAA common space of initiatives and competenciesPortfolio of initiatives and project consortia
ECO‑PPAMobilizing resources to prevent threatsResult contract, financing and liability
SPECZASHCHITACooperative Organisation of ImplementationProduction cooperation, pilot and operation
ESG‑IR 1.0Reporting, evidence and impact ratingVerified indicators and rating
GASMP “EQUILIBRIUM”Aerospace and ground early warning monitoringGlobal observations and projections
KRISTALL741Modular matrix of system assemblyModules and links directory

9.1. Common route of the initiative

9.2. Allocation of responsibility

  • The customer determines the socially significant task and the criteria for the result.
  • The scientific circuit is responsible for hypothesis, method, and reproducibility.
  • The engineering circuit is responsible for the implementation, quality and operational suitability.
  • The financial contour links payouts and capital with confirmed stages.
  • Validator independently confirms the data, effect and limitations.
  • The public contour provides transparency, feedback and legitimacy.

10. Governance, ethics and security

10.1. The institutional model

OrganFunction
EUT International CouncilPrinciples, compatibility and resolution of transboundary issues
Scientific and Methodological CouncilMethods, levels of evidence and expert requirements
The Architectural CommitteeOntology, data, interfaces and version management
Committee on Ethics and RightsHuman rights, justice, non-discrimination and appeals
Cyber Security CenterThreat modeling, infrastructure protection and response
EUT RegisterPassports, versions, evidence, statuses and restrictions
National centresAdaptation to the law, standards and priorities of States

10.2. Red Lines

  • inadmissibility of hidden social ranking and discrimination;
  • Prohibition of automatic decision affecting fundamental rights without human control and appeal;
  • minimization of personal data and targeted restriction of their use;
  • prohibition of concealment of significant risks, negative tests and conflicts of interest;
  • mandatory emergency shutdown and safe mode for critical systems;
  • preservation of national sovereignty and cultural diversity.

10.3. Access model

The data is divided into open, proprietary, confidential, personal and critical. Access is determined not only by the role, but also by the purpose, timing, context, and minimum required volume. All significant actions are recorded and subject to audit.

11. Economic and financial model

EUT is shifting funding from payment of promises to phased funding of proven progress. Each tranche is related to the level of readiness, the control point, the confirmed result and the risk limit.

11.1. Sources

  • government programs and procurement of innovations;
  • private capital, project financing and strategic investments;
  • ECO-PPA and contracts of preventive damage;
  • green, social and transitional financial instruments;
  • cooperative and public financing;
  • international funds, development banks and targeted programs;
  • licensing, service payments and equity participation in the effect.

11.2. Value model

Contour of ValueExamples of results
EconomicLower total cost of ownership, productivity growth, new markets
EnvironmentalReducing emissions, restoring ecosystems, resource efficiency
SocialHealth, employment, access to services, reduction of inequality
SecurityReducing the likelihood and scale of damage, sustainability of infrastructure
KnowledgeableNew data, competencies, patents, standards and educational programs
InstitutionalIncreased trust, transparency and ability to cooperate

11.3. The principle of effect distribution

Before the project starts, the rules for the distribution of intellectual rights, income, savings, preventable damage and social effect are fixed. Participants' remuneration should take into account not only capital, but also data, knowledge, infrastructure, labor, risk and contribution of the territory.

12. International Positioning

The EUT can be proposed as a voluntary international framework of technological compatibility and evidence for sustainable development projects, threat prevention and peaceful cooperation. It complements, rather than replaces, existing international standards and national law.

12.1. Potential areas of cooperation

  • UN and specialized agencies - link to SDGs, disaster risk reduction and technological assistance;
  • international development banks - evidence-based project financing;
  • Standardization organizations - harmonization of terminology, data and protocols;
  • scientific unions and universities - open tests and reproducibility;
  • States and cities - pilot territories and cross-border programs;
  • business and industry - compatible solutions, supply chains and scaling;
  • Community organizations and indigenous peoples - protection of rights, local knowledge and equitable participation.

12.2. Proposed international product

12.3. Principle of Neutrality

The framework should be technology-neutral, not enshrining the advantages of an individual supplier and allowing for different implementations while respecting common requirements for safety, evidence, compatibility and human rights.

13. Road map 2026–2035

StageTimeframeKey result
I. Institution2026–2027EUT Council, Thesaurus, Passport, Levels of Readiness, Pilot Methodology
II. Piloting2027–2028Three to five pilots, evidence registry, national validation centers
III. Standardization2028–2030EUT standard package 1.x, accreditation, mutual recognition of results
IV. Scaling2030–2032Sectoral and interregional programs, financial products under the effect
V. International Network2032–2035EUT Charter, cross-border projects, open federation of registries

13.1. First 180 days

  1. To approve the mandate, boundaries and principles of the program.
  2. To form an interdisciplinary EUT Council and working groups.
  3. Accept version 0.9 of the technology passport and the availability code.
  4. Identify three pilots and baselines.
  5. Deploy a prototype of the technology and evidence registry.
  6. Agree on requirements for independent validation and conflicts of interest.
  7. To prepare an international consultation package and a draft Charter.

13.2. Management gate

14. Pilot program

14.1. Pilot 1 — Bicentennial territory

Complex of ground, biological, acoustic and aerospace monitoring of the territory with a digital double, early warning and recovery program. The pilot checks a bunch of GASMP, biocenose points, EQUILIBRIUM and ECO-PPA.

14.2. Pilot 2 — Pure materials science

The production chain of high-purity and low-carbon materials: origin of raw materials, digital technological map, quality control, life cycle assessment, industrial safety and evidence-based economics.

14.3. Pilot 3 - Sustainable Territory

Integration of energy, water, waste, logistics, social infrastructure and local cooperation at the municipal or inter-municipal cluster level.

14.4. General protocol of the pilot

BlockObligatory result
Base LineFixed baseline status and data quality
HypothesisMeasurable effect and conditions of rebuttal
DesignSolution architecture, alternatives and risk management plan
ImplementationProtocol of works, roles, versions and log of decisions
EvaluationComparison with baseline and control alternative
ValidationIndependent Conclusion and Disclosure of Limitations
ScalingEconomy, localization, standards and replication plan

15. System of indicators

15.1. The Integral Model

The integral EUT index should not hide weaknesses by an average value. Therefore, the final score combines a weighted score and mandatory thresholds of safety, human rights and evidence quality. Breaking the critical threshold blocks scaling regardless of the aggregate score.

GroupExamples of indicators
PerformanceAchievement of the goal, sustainability of the effect, coverage
EvidenceData quality, reproducibility, independence of verification
SecurityFrequency of incidents, residual risk, recovery time
EconomyLife cycle cost, payback period, sensitivity
EcologyResources, emissions, biodiversity, cycling
Social impactAccessibility, health, employment, equity
CompatibilityOpen interfaces, portability, share of reusable modules
SovereigntyCritical dependencies, localization, substitution
EducativenessThe speed of updating the model and eliminating the identified defects

15.2. Minimum set of KPI programs

  • the share of technologies with a full digital passport;
  • Pilots with independent validation;
  • time from initiative to operational pilot;
  • share of reusable modules and data;
  • the amount of damage prevented and the confirmed effect;
  • Number of mutually recognized centres and cross-border projects;
  • number of critical incidents and average recovery time;
  • The proportion of decisions that have been tested for rights, ethics and security.

16. Risks and management measures

RiskManifestationControl measure
Excessive centralizationLoss of initiative and adaptabilityFederal architecture and subsidiarity
BureaucratizationPassport becomes a formalityRisk-based Demand Depth and Automation
Technological MonopolyDependence on one supplierOpen interfaces, portability and antitrust rules
Manipulation of indicatorsOptimizing the report instead of the resultIndependent data, audit and whistleblower protection
Data breachDamage to people and infrastructureMinimizing, segmenting, encrypting and controlling access targets
Errors AIFalse Predictions and DecisionsExplainability, human control, tests and power constraints
Conflict of JurisdictionsNon-applicability of a single ruleModular legal compliance and mutual recognition
Distrust of societyResistance to implementationParticipation, transparency, appeal and measurable social impact
Premature scalingIncreased Hidden DamageMandatory gate of maturity and stop at critical deviation

16.1. Principle of Reversibility

In the early stages, preferred solutions that can be safely stopped, replaced or rolled back. Irreversible changes require enhanced evidence base, enhanced public participation, and independent expertise.

17. Draft EUT declaration

We believe that technology should serve the preservation of life, human development, the sustainability of society and harmonious interaction with nature.

  1. We recognize the integrity of natural, human, technical and cultural systems.
  2. We affirm the primacy of human dignity, security and responsibility.
  3. We accept measurability and evidence as the basis of trust.
  4. We ensure traceability of data, decisions, versions and consequences.
  5. We create compatible technologies that are open to cooperation and protected from abuse.
  6. We combine funding with a proven social, environmental and economic impact.
  7. We preserve the diversity of cultures and the sovereign right of States to determine development paths.
  8. We are developing international cooperation to prevent common threats.
  9. We recognize the right of future generations to a safe planet and access to the heritage of civilizations.
  10. We are committed to constantly improve the standards of the EUT on the basis of new knowledge and experience.

18. Conclusion

Unified unified technologies create a missing bridge between universal principles, scientific evidence, engineering execution, public responsibility and international scaling. Their value lies not in claiming the only truth, but in their ability to turn complexity into a coherent architecture of action.

The first practical step should not be the adoption of a comprehensive standard, but the launch of a limited EUT 1.0 program: a common passport, a readiness code, three pilots, independent validation and an open register of results. This way will allow you to test the architecture in practice, maintain the reversibility of decisions and build trust.

Annex A. The minimum set of documents of the EUT project

  • Passport problem and base line.
  • Passport technology and architectural scheme.
  • Data management and cybersecurity plan.
  • Test report and stop criteria.
  • Risk register, ethical assessment and stakeholder map.
  • The financial life cycle model.
  • Independent validation report.
  • Plan for operation, monitoring and scaling.

Annex B. Terms

TermWorking definition
UnificationHarmonization of formats and rules while maintaining the allowable variety of implementations
CompatibilityAbility of systems to share data and perform functions together
EvidenceVerifiable set of data, method, result and constraints
ValidationConfirmation that the solution is suitable for the stated purpose
VerificationConfirmation of compliance with specified requirements and specifications
Digital twinDynamic digital model of an object or system associated with the observed data
Prevented damageThe estimated difference between the baseline risk scenario and the confirmed outcome of the intervention

Annex B. Checklist for pilot access

  • The owner of the result, the territory and interested parties are determined.
  • The basic line, data sources and criteria of their quality are fixed.
  • Hypothesis, measurable effect and criteria of refutation are formulated.
  • Preliminary safety, rights and ethical implications assessments have been conducted.
  • An independent validator has been appointed and conflicts of interest have been disclosed.
  • The budget, calendar, control points and stopping conditions have been approved.
  • The rules of data access, intellectual property and publication of results are defined.
  • Plans for operation, emergency response and reversibility have been prepared.

Annex G. Status of the document

Version 1.0 is the basis for expert discussion and design of the pilot program. The next edition should take into account the comments of scientific organizations, authorities, industry, financial institutions, public associations and international partners.

Other published edition: EUT EUT_Single_unified_technologies_presentation.pptx · web text +

Common language for transforming knowledge, resources and solutions into verifiable and scalable results

SINGLE

UNIFIED

TECHNOLOGIES

Law

↓

Model

↓

Standard

↓

Result

EQUILIBRIUM - SFERA - ECO - PPA - SPECZASHCHITA

23 August 2026

technology a lot. Compatibility and trust are not enough

EASTERN SITUATION

Science

different data

Different criteria

Different horizons

SYSTEM-WIDE

DIVISIONS

Industry

Strong solutions

not reach the scale

Finance

Management

The EUT closes the gap with a single cycle of description, verification and implementation.

EUT is a super-system framework, not a single universal machine

DEFINITION

An open system of principles, models, standards, and protocols that turns design and resources into a safe, measurable, and validated outcome.

EUT does not replace

EUT UNITEDS

Science and Industry Standards

Common language of data and processes

National law and sovereignty

Evidence and safety

Cultural and technological diversity

Funding and Scaling

EUT turns idea into trust through eight verifiable transitions

KEY MECHANISM

Law

Model

Standard

Decision

Pilot

Verification

Trust

Scale

Each transition has an owner, input, readiness criterion and proof of outcome.

Observation starts a new cycle - the system is constantly learning

Twelve principles maintain the integrity of the system

FOUNDATIONS

Integrity

Openness to protection

Measurability

Feedback

Reproducibility

Fair distribution

Modularity

Subsidiarity

Traceability

Technological Sovereignty

Security by Design

International compatibility

Seven layers connect the base with the international scale

ARCHITECTURE

7 Scaling

6 Trust

5 Management

4 Execution

3 Modeling

2 Data

1 Bases

Cross-cutting mechanisms: identification • Version • Access • Responsibility • feedback

Twelve technological contours work in one system

SCOPE OF APPLICATION

Observation and Sensory

Infrastructure

Data and knowledge

Human health

AI and forecasting

Social cooperation

Materials Science

Finance and assets

Energy

Security

Ecology and Biotic Communities

Culture and heritage

The common passport and the evidence cycle allow you to combine solutions from different industries without loss of responsibility.

Digital passport makes technology comparable and manageable

UNIT OF THE SYSTEM

Identity and owner

Risks and constraints

PASSPORT

TECHNOLOGIES

Problem and purpose

Evidence

The Unified Version of Truth

Scientific basis

Law, IP and data

Machine Readable

Renovated

Verified

Architecture and Resources

Operation

Effects and indicators

Scaling

Eight levels of readiness do not allow scaling the hypothesis

Maturity

EUT‑1

Hypothesis

EUT‑3

Polygon

EUT‑5

Standard

EUT‑7

Network

EUT‑0

Idea

EUT‑2

Prototype

EUT‑4

Pilot

EUT‑6

Scale

Transition is allowed only after confirmation of the result, risk and economy of the previous level.

Developer shows the result - independent validator confirms

PROOF

DEVELOPER

OPERATOR

VALIDAR

Hypothesis

Method

Protocol

real data

Operation

Incidents

Method

effect

Limitations

Negative results and restrictions are kept in the register on a par with positive ones.

Each component is responsible for its own portion of the overall cycle

ECOSYSTEM

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

ECO‑PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

observation • forecast • control

• Expertise • Cooperation

resources • contract result

Execution • Pilot • Operation

Initiative → Expertise → Co-operation → resource support → Pilot → Confirmed result → Scaling

ESG‑IR 1.0 verifies indicators • GASMP provides global data • KRISTALL741 defines modularity

EUT demands federal model, red lines and right of appeal

GOVERNANCE

International Council

Scientific and Methodological Council

The Architectural Committee

Committee on Ethics and Rights

Cyber Security Center

National centres

RED LINES

No hidden social ranking

No critical decisions without human control

no concealment of risks and conflicts of interest

Security • Dignity • Sovereignty • Reversibility

Capital is allocated according to the stages of confirmed progress

ECONOMY

PAYMENT OF PROMISES

FINANCING

PROVEN PROGRESS

Single tranche

unclear effect

Hidden Risks

Level of readiness

control point

independent confirmation

Limit of risk

Economic • Environmental • Social • Safety • Knowledge Effect

Three pilots check the EUT in nature, production and territory

FIRST APPLICATIONS

01

BIOCENOSIS

TERRITORY

02

NET

MATERIALS

03

SUSTAINABLE

TERRITORY

monitoring • forecast • recovery

Quality • Life Cycle • Low Carbon

energy • water • logistics • cooperation

General protocol: base line → Hypothesis → design → execution → evaluation → Validation → Scaling

For nine years, the EUT has gone from methodology to international network

ROAD MAP

Institution

Advice • Thesaurus • Passport • Readiness code

2026–27

Piloting

3–5 Pilots • Registry • Validation Centers

2027–28

Standardization

EUT 1.x • Accreditation • Mutual recognition

2028–30

Scaling

industry programs • financial products

2030–32

International Network

Charter • cross-border projects • Federation of Registers

2032–35

The first 180 days must create the rules of the game and proof pilot

STARTING

Approve the mandate and limits of the program

RESULT

Form the EUT Council and Working Groups

Single passport

3 Pilot

the Open Registry

International Group

Accept passport 0.9 and availability code

Choose three pilots and base lines

Deploy Proof Registry Prototype

Appoint independent validators

To prepare the EUT International Charter

Run the EUT 1.0 program as a limited test experiment

PROPOSED SOLUTION

Do not accept a comprehensive standard in advance. First, a common passport, a code of readiness, three pilots, independent validation and an open register of results.

A

Measurable problem

B

Reproduced prototype

C

Confirmed effect

D

Ready for scale

A solution is required: to establish the EUT Council and approve the preparation of the pilot program.

The Common Technological Language of Civilization

Unified Standardised Technologies

LAW

↓

MODEL

↓

STANDARD

↓

DECISION

↓

TRUST

Working together without eliminating differences

scaling solutions without scaling errors

EUT = integrity × proof × compatibility

× responsibility × scalability

Published files

Platform · Full published text

UCC Integration

Source Status: Primary Document

into the ECO-PPA — EQUILIBRIUM — EUT supersystem

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/ucc-v-nadsisteme

Open on the site

Architecture of cross-border commercial transactions, provisioning, digital records and legal routing

Version 1.0

20 August 2026

Status: Concept paper for subsequent legal, financial and technical verification

1. Summary

UCC should be integrated not as a "supreme law" over states, but as a specialized American commercial module within the international ECO-PPA supersystem. The supersystem should preserve the sovereignty of applicable national law, but provide a common language for transactions, assets, liabilities, collateral and outcomes.

UCC is a model commercial code, the norms of which are introduced by the legislation of individual US states. Therefore, it is legally incorrect to specify in the contract only "UCC": it is necessary to determine the law of a particular state, the relationship of the transaction with the chosen jurisdiction, the applicable articles, federal restrictions and the procedure for resolving disputes.

2. Purpose of integration

  • create a unified contractual framework for energy, environmental and production projects;
  • link the long-term order ECO-PPA with bank financing and security;
  • ensure compatibility of Russian, international and American commercial contours;
  • create a provable chain: right - obligation - asset - security - performance - result;
  • automate the choice of the applicable legal module without substituting legislation with a digital platform.

3. Limits of applicability UCC

PositionCorrect interpretation
Legal statusUCC is not an international treaty and does not act as a universal world law.
TerritorialityThe revision adopted by the relevant state of the United States, taking into account federal law, is applied.
Choice of lawThe admissibility of the choice depends on the relationship of the transaction to the jurisdiction and the mandatory conflict of laws rules.
Registration UCC-1Generally, it notifies the claimed security interest, but does not create the asset or ownership in itself.
Digital recordingThe internal register can confirm events and documents, but does not replace the mandatory state registration.

4. Supersystem architecture

4.1. Level of principles — EQUILIBRIUM

EQUILIBRIUM defines the target state and system limitations: balance of interests, integrity, evidence, environmental and social performance, responsibility of participants and inadmissibility of violation of stability of the whole system. This level is a design doctrine, not a self-executing law.

4.2. Operational Constitution - EUT

The EUT forms a single language for operations and data:

  • identifiers of the participant, project, contract, asset and liabilities;
  • the moment of occurrence, change, transfer and termination of the right;
  • type and priority of provision;
  • units of energy and environmental result measurement;
  • events of execution, violation and default;
  • references to primary documents and official registers;
  • Verification rules and audit trail.

4.3. Legal Router

The legal router is the central mechanism of the supersystem. For each operation, it determines:

  1. Status, residency and jurisdiction of the parties.
  2. Location of equipment, goods, account and other assets.
  3. Legal qualification of the subject of the transaction.
  4. Applicable substantive and conflict-of-laws law.
  5. Imperative public law restrictions.
  6. Procedure for creation and registration of security.
  7. Competent court or agreed arbitration.
  8. Foreign exchange, tax, sanctions and compliance requirements.

5. Modular card UCC

ModuleFunction in the supersystem
Article 1Common definitions, good faith, contractual practices and basic rules.
Article 2Sale of equipment, materials, drives, eco-modules and components.
Article 2ALeasing of energy and industrial equipment.
Articles 3–4ARevolving instruments, banking operations and commercial transfers.
Article 5Letters of credit and documentation of supplies.
Article 7Warehouse certificates and documents of title.
Article 8Investment securities and related rights.
Article 9Security interests in assets and income.
Article 12Controlled electronic records and individual digital assets.

For ECO-PPA Articles are of priority 2, 5, 7, 9 and 12: they link the supply of equipment, documentary calculations, commodity documents, financing and digital turnover of rights.

6. Key financial contour: Article 9

In the U.S. outline, Article 9 can be used to structure security interests in equipment, inventory, claim rights, proceeds of PPA, insurance payments and other proceeds - provided that the asset is properly qualified and the requirements of applicable law are met.

The EUT must record not only the registration record, but also the entire legal chain:

  1. Basic contract and economic obligation.
  2. Security agreement and description of the security item.
  3. The emergence of a security interest.
  4. Registration or control, depending on the type of asset.
  5. Check competing claims and priority.
  6. Monitoring the safety of the asset and income.
  7. The procedure for recovery upon default.

7. International Legal Bridge

ContourBasic legal regime
Russian operationsRF Civil Code, energy, environmental, financial, currency and public law of the Russian Federation.
International supplyCISG, where the Convention is applicable; national law on matters outside its scope.
The American DealThe law of the selected state, the corresponding version of UCC and applicable U.S. federal law.
Digital documentsNational rules on electronic signature and documents; MLETR - only in implementing jurisdictions.
DisputesNational court or agreed arbitration with enforceable reservation and verification of recognition of the decision.

CISG regulates the international sale of goods between commercial parties, but does not cover the entire range of services, project financing, collateral and public obligations of ECO-PPA. Therefore, the master agreement should separate the applicable modes for each block of relations.

8. Construction of the master agreement ECO-PPA

Part A. Universal EUT Core

  • parties, roles and powers;
  • item, delivery and guaranteed result;
  • Energy, environmental, industrial and social indicators;
  • measurement, reporting and verification methods;
  • payment mechanism and adjustments;
  • change management;
  • events of violation and termination;
  • Digital audit trail.

Part B. Jurisdictional applications

  • RU-module - Russian law and mandatory requirements;
  • CISG-module - international supply of goods;
  • UCC-module of a particular state - sales, leasing, settlements, security and digital records;
  • modules of other states - with the expansion of the geography of the project.

Part C. Project application

  • object, territory, capacity and term;
  • price, indexation and delivery schedule;
  • equipment and localization requirements;
  • financing and security package;
  • KPI and the method of confirming the effect;
  • Responsible operators and control points.

9. EUT Register Model

The supersystem should not proclaim a single private “register of all property”. A correct model is a network of linked registers and evidence records synchronized with official sources.

RegisterWhat is fixed
ParticipantsLegal capacity, powers, KYC/KYB and roles.
ProjectsProject passport, territory, stages and responsible.
AssetsDescription, location, owner, encumbrances, documents.
Contractual rightsRequirements, concessions, restrictions and deadlines.
SecurityBasis, subject, registration, control and priority.
ResultsEnergy, environmental effect, social and production KPI.
VerificationsMethodology, expert, date, evidence and conclusion.
Payments and defaultsCharges, payments, violations and response measures.

10. Management system and roles

ParticipantRole
EQUILIBRIUMBalance doctrine, target architecture, and system constraints.
EUT / PSORData standards, project evaluation, evidence and routing.
SFERAAcceptance of initiatives, expertise, cooperation, piloting and scaling.
ECO-PPALong-term order and contractual fixation of a measurable result.
SPECZASHCHITACooperative organization of execution and collection of project consortia.
Project companyOwnership of the project, attraction of financing and fulfillment of obligations.
Financial OutlineFunding, calculations, security, risk control.
Legal CommitteeVerification of applicable law and jurisdictional modules.
Independent VerifierConfirmation of energy, environmental and social effects.

11. Prohibitions and control restrictions

  • not to present UCC as a right automatically applicable to States;
  • not to use UCC-1 as independent proof of the creation of property, debt or sovereign status;
  • not to replace the internal record with mandatory state registration;
  • not to combine different legal regimes in one condition of the treaty without a conflict clause;
  • not to issue a digital asset without qualification of its legal nature, issuer, security and treatment regime;
  • not to launch a cross-border payment without sanctions, currency, tax and bank verification;
  • Do not automate execution if the code is contrary to the signed contract or mandatory law.

12. Road map of implementation

StageResult
1. Legal inventoryMap of participants, jurisdictions, assets, flows and mandatory norms.
2. EUT TaxonomyA unified dictionary of transactions, rights, assets, security, events and evidence.
3. Master AgreementUniversal ECO-PPA core and a set of jurisdictional applications.
4. Legal RouterRules of choice of law, registration, court/arbitration and compliance.
5. Register PrototypeRelated records of projects, assets, collaterals, results and payments.
6. PilotOne mini-generation object or eco-module with Russian and external contour.
7. VerificationLegal opinion, financial model, information security audit and data verification.
8. ScalingStandard packages by industry, region and jurisdiction.

13. Minimum set of pilot documents

  1. The passport of the project ECO-PPA and the scheme of participants.
  2. Master agreement and project application.
  3. Contract of supply, construction, operation or leasing.
  4. Funding agreement and security package.
  5. Conclusion on applicable law and conflict of interest risks.
  6. Measurement and verification of environmental results.
  7. Digital Registry Regulation and Access Matrix.
  8. Policy KYC/KYB, sanctions and anti-corruption control.
  9. Plan for managing default, operator replacement and project continuity.
  10. A set of corporate decisions and powers of signatories.

14. Final model

Such a design allows the development of an international platform without a legally risky claim of supranational power UCC. The supersystem does not become a “single law”, but a compatible architecture of contracts, data, registers, evidence and executors.

The main principle:

SINGLE DATA AND STANDARDS —
MANY LEGAL ADJUSTMENT CONTROLS

Sources and normative guidelines

  • Uniform Commercial Code § 1-301. Territorial Applicability; Parties’ Power to Choose Applicable Law. https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-301
  • Uniform Law Commission. Uniform Commercial Code and 2022 Amendments. https://www.uniformlaws.org/acts/ucc
  • UNCITRAL. United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/salegoods/conventions/sale_of_goods/cisg
  • UNCITRAL. Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records (MLETR). https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/ecommerce/modellaw/electronic_transferable_records

Note: before use in a real transaction, it is necessary to check the current wording of the law of the state concerned, the status of adoption of amendments UCC 2022, the applicability of CISG, the mode of electronic records and all public legal restrictions.

Other published edition: INTEGRATION UCC UCC_in_supersystem_ECO-PPA_EQUILIBRIUM_EUT.pptx · Web Text +

into the ECO-PPA — EQUILIBRIUM — EUT supersystem

KEY PRINCIPLE

One Supersystem

Data and Standards

Many legally correct contours of execution

Architecture of cross-border commercial transactions, provisioning, digital records and legal routing

Version 1.0 • 22 August 2026

UCC - not "law over states"

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

It operates as a jurisdictional commercial module within the international system.

What UCC gives the system

What UCC does not do

the Rules of Sale and Leasing of Assets

does not abolish Russian or other national law

payments, letters of credit and documents

does not create international jurisdiction by itself

security interests and priority

does not convert UCC-1 into property right

Controlled Electronic Records

Conclusion: you need to choose the right of a particular state and check the relationship of the transaction with this jurisdiction.

Supersystem combines modes, but does not mix them

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

Each level has its own legal or operational function.

Peremptory law

Public regulations, prohibitions and mandatory registrations

International and conflict-of-laws rules

Define an acceptable legal route

Selected Applicable Law

Russia, a specific state of the USA, other jurisdiction

Master Agreement ECO-PPA

Long-term order and measurable result

EUT and digital audit trail

Common language of data, events and evidence

EQUILIBRIUM sets goals; The EUT ensures the implementation

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

A legal router links a common architecture to a specific jurisdiction.

EQUILIBRIUM

EUT

LEGAL

MARCHRUTIZER

ECO-PPA

Objectives • Balance • Limitations

Unified language of operations

Applicable Law • Register

contract • result • control

Architecture is not a substitute for law: it determines what legal contour each operation should perform.

Legal router checks eight terms of the transaction

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

Status and jurisdiction of the parties

Imperative restrictions

Location of the asset

creation and registration of security

Qualifying the subject of the transaction

Court or Arbitration

Applicable law

currency, tax and sanctions control

UCC: five modules of the ECO core-PPA

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

ARTICLE 2

ARTICLE 5

ARTICLE 7

ARTICLE 9

ARTICLE 12

Delivery

Calculations

Documents

Resource provision

Digital circulation

Equipment • Materials

letters of credit •

warehousing and commodity documents

assets • revenue • priority

Controlled Records

Articles 1, 2A, 3, 4, 4A and 8 are connected as additional modules by type of operation.

Article 9 links funding to real-world collateral

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

Agreement

Resource provision

Registration

Priority

Monitoring

economic obligation

Assets and income

or establishing control

Verification of competing claims

asset, revenue, default

UCC-1 is a notice of claimed security interest, not an independent creation of property.

The four contours of the international bridge

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

The Civil Code of the Russian Federation and special public law

RUSSIA

CISG - only in its field of application

INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY

State Law + Federal Law

USA

national standards; MLETR - where implemented

DIGITAL DOCUMENTS

The master agreement distributes the regimes by blocks of the transaction - supply, services, financing, security and dispute.

The Master Agreement consists of three interrelated parts.

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

Universal EUT Core

Jurisdictional applications

Project application

Roles • Result • KPI • Payments • Default

RU • CISG • UCC State • other countries

Property • Price • Term • Security • Verification

Legal integrity arises only when all three parts are signed and agreed upon.

EUT — evidence-based digital twin

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

It binds evidence, but does not substitute for official registers.

Participants

Support

EUT

projects

results

Communications • Events • Evidence

assets

Verify

contractual rights

payments and defaults

Official state and commercial registers retain legal priority where registration is required.

Roles Divided: Strategy, Contract, Execution and Control

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

EQUILIBRIUM

EUT / PSOR

Goals and Balance

data and evaluation

SFERA

ECO-PPA

initiatives and scaling

Long term order

SPECZASHCHITA

Project company

Co-operation of execution

Assets and liabilities

Legal Committee

Verifier

Applicable law

confirmation of the result

Seven bans exclude legal fictions

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

not to declare UCC a supranational right

not consider UCC-1 as proof of ownership

Do not replace the mandatory registration with an internal record

not to mix regimes without a conflict clause

Do not issue a digital asset without legal qualification

Do not make cross-border payments without compliance

Do not give code priority over contract and law

The pilot goes through eight consecutive stages.

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

Each stage creates a verifiable legal or technical result.

Transaction map

Taxonomy

EUT

Master-

Contract

Legal

route

Prototype

Registry

Object

Pilot

Verification

Scale

Recommended pilot: one mini-generation object or eco-module with a Russian and external commercial circuit.

Ten documents are required before raising capital

STRATEGIC AND LEGAL CONCEPT

project passport

Verification method

Master Agreement

the Digital Registry Regulation

supply contract / EPC / leasing

KYC/KYB and sanctions control

financing and provision

Default Management Plan

Conclusion on applicable law

Corporate Solutions

Funding is opened after a legal opinion, verification of the provision and confirmation of the result methodology.

Form a pilot circuit UCC — ECO-PPA — EUT

SOLUTION FOR STARTING

PILOT OBJECT

Approve a working group, select an object and prepare a master agreement package with jurisdictional applications.

JURISDICTION

RESPONSIBLE

One supersystem of data and standards is a set of legally correct execution contours.

Sources cited in presentation 5

  • https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-301
  • https://www.uniformlaws.org/acts/ucc
  • [/Sources]
  • https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/salegoods/conventions/sale_of_goods/cisg
  • https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/ecommerce/modellaw/electronic_transferable_records

Published files

Platform · Full published text

Five Elements, Five Portals

Source Status: Primary Document

The navigation system of the City of Events: from the symbolic logic of five elements to clear development portals.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/portaly-stikhiy-gorod-sobytiy

Open on the site

FOUNDATIONS

SFERA

EVENTS

MEANING

COMMUNICATIONS

KNOWLEDGE

EVENTS

Foundation • Communities • Events • Knowledge • Meaning

CITY OF EVENTS

Strategic idea

The elements are internal logic. Portals are an external language for the site, partners and users.

FORMULA

not esotericism on the facade, but clear navigation

Each portal is responsible for one type of development

The City of Events is a system where place, people, action, knowledge and meaning are combined into development projects.

Any project goes through five questions

all portals converge to the Event Sphere

Five portals give the project a full cycle: from the base to the mission.

CITY OF EVENTS

Five portals of development

The center of the system is the Event Sphere. Portals form an entry map for the person, team, project, and organization.

FOUNDATIONS

FOUNDATIONS

EVENTS

Space • Infrastructure • Resources • Territories

forums • festivals • awards • launches

MEANING

COMMUNICATIONS

SFERA

EVENTS

COMMUNICATIONS

KNOWLEDGE

People • Culture • Links • Partnerships

Education • Media • Analytics • Navigation

MEANING

Mission • Values • Image of the future • Strategy

KNOWLEDGE

EVENTS

CITY OF EVENTS

PORTAL OF BASIS

LAND / INTERNAL SYMBOL

Space • Infrastructure • Resources • Territories

"Where the idea gets land, form and support"

Positioning

Basis: material base of development, where the project receives the site, infrastructure and resource map.

sites and facilities

Territories and Clusters

LAND

Production and Crafts

FOUNDATIONS

Urban infrastructure

Resource Map

CITY OF EVENTS

PORTAL OF COMMUNICATIONS

WATER / INTERNAL SYMBOL

People • Culture • Links • Partnerships

"Where people unite in a living force"

Positioning

Communities: a space of living connections where people, partnerships and cultural environments are formed around projects.

Clubs and Communities

Partner Networks

WATER

People's Diplomacy

COMMUNICATIONS

Social programs

Volunteering and Care

CITY OF EVENTS

PORTAL OF EVENTS

FIRE / INTERNAL SYMBOL

forums • festivals • awards • launches

"Where an idea becomes an event"

Positioning

Events: the main outline of the launch, where the idea becomes a public action, forum, festival or campaign.

forums and festivals

Awards and competitions

FIRE

strategic sessions

EVENTS

Media campaigns

registration and broadcasting

CITY OF EVENTS

PORTAL OF KNOWLEDGE

AIR / INTERNAL SYMBOL

Education • Media • Analytics • Navigation

"Where the event gets map and knowledge"

Positioning

Knowledge: an intellectual center where methodologies, media, analytics, training and navigation are created.

Academy and courses

Media Center

AIR

analytics and reports

KNOWLEDGE

the Culture and Cinema Registers

the Expert Database

CITY OF EVENTS

PORTAL OF MEANING

ETHER / INTERNAL SYMBOL

Mission • Values • Image of the future • Strategy

"Where projects become a common mission"

Positioning

Meanings: The Highest Outline of Mission, Values, the Image of the Future, and Civilizational Strategy.

Manifesto and Charter

Values and Code

EFIR

image of the future

MEANING

Civilizational strategy

Contact EQUILIBRIUM

CITY OF EVENTS

How the project goes through the portals

Five questions turn any initiative into a complete element of the ecosystem.

Basis

Community

Events

Knowledge

Meaning

What is the material base, site and resource of the project?

What are the people, partners and audiences around the project?

What action, launch or event makes a project visible?

What materials, media, analytics and training accompany it?

What mission, value and image of the future does it carry?

If the project answers all five questions, it is ready for packaging, launch, partnerships and scaling.

CITY OF EVENTS

Navigation of the main page

Five portals can be used as the main screen of the site and an ecosystem map.

CITY OF EVENTS

Five portals of human development, city and society

FOUNDATIONS

COMMUNICATIONS

EVENTS

KNOWLEDGE

MEANING

Space • Infrastructure

People • Culture

forums • festivals

Education • Media

Mission • Values

Below the screen - a brief description, upcoming events, project map, partners and entry for initiatives.

CITY OF EVENTS

Positioning for different audiences

One architecture, but different explanations for citizens, business, state, culture and education.

Citizens

Where to come, what to learn, where to participate, with whom to unite

Business

where to find partners, venues, events, teams and public outline

State

How to build initiatives into a managed map of projects and effects

Culture

How to connect events, communities, heritage, media and meanings

Education

how to turn knowledge into programs, events and project trajectories

Portals should explain not “what we came up with”, but “how a person enters, participates and gets the result”.

CITY OF EVENTS

Visual code of portals

Color, symbol and tone help a person quickly understand the purpose of each input.

FOUNDATIONS

COMMUNICATIONS

EVENTS

KNOWLEDGE

MEANING

reliability

Matter

support

Communication

Participation

Culture

impulse

Launch

action

Clarity

learning

Media

Mission

Values

the future

Recommendation: on the site leave the names of the portals business, and use the elements as a deep symbolism and visual system.

CITY OF EVENTS

Portal content matrix

Each portal should have the same basic set of blocks: this will simplify the production of the site and presentations.

Purpose

Projects

People

Events

Documents

What the portal decides

Active initiatives

Teams and Partners

Launch Calendar

manifestos / regulations

So each section becomes not a showcase, but a working entrance to the ecosystem: a person sees the meaning, projects, participants, the nearest action and rules of inclusion.

CITY OF EVENTS

The ground gives room. Communities give people. Events have action. Knowledge gives navigation. Meaning gives mission.

FINAL FORMULA

FOUNDATIONS

SFERA

EVENTS

MEANING

COMMUNICATIONS

When five portals connect, the event ceases to be a one-time action. It becomes the point of development of man, city and society.

KNOWLEDGE

EVENTS

CITY OF EVENTS

CITY OF EVENTS

Published files

Platform · Full published text

Russia: An Ideal World Order

Source Status: Primary Document

The doctrine of higher order reality

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/rossiya-idealnoe-miroustroistvo

Open on the site

Russia as a space where human dignity, the power of the state, culture, science, nature and the creative economy are united in a single system of development.

EQUILIBRIUM • THE BOOK OF FIRE • THE CHOICE OF THE FUTURE

Preamble

The ideal world order of Russia is not a description of an unattainable utopia and not a project of total reorganization of a person. It is an image of a country’s target state, in which institutions, economy, culture, technology, and natural environment serve to unlock human potential, public justice, and long-term sustainability.

Russia in this model does not abandon its historical identity and does not dissolve in global uniformity. On the contrary, it combines state sovereignty with open civilizational cooperation, tradition with scientific development, spiritual heritage with technological modernity, freedom with responsibility.

The reality of the higher order is understood here as the principle of coordination: a person is not opposed to the family, society to the state, the economy to nature, technology to culture, Russia to humanity. The task of the system is to reduce destructive contradictions and create conditions under which the development of one level strengthens the others.

I. The main image of Russia of the future

Russia is a creator country: a strong, just, cultural, technologically independent and environmentally responsible civilization, in which development is measured not only by the volume of production, but also by the quality of the person, family, environment, knowledge and future.

  • Man is the goal of development, not a resource.
  • The family is the basic environment of trust, education and continuity.
  • People are carriers of culture, memory and historical meaning.
  • The state is an institution of service, security and strategic development.
  • The economy is a mechanism of creation and fair exchange.
  • Science and technology are tools to empower people and countries.
  • Nature is not a storehouse of resources, but the lifeblood of civilization.
  • Culture is the highest code that defines the image of man and the future.

II. Man of the highest order

In the center of the ideal world order is a mature person: free, educated, healthy, cultural, responsible and capable of creation.

  • Dignity is the unconditional basis of the attitude of the state and society to man.
  • Conscience is the internal limit of what is permissible.
  • Freedom is the ability to consciously choose and respond to consequences.
  • Labor is a form of participation in the common creation, not just a means of survival.
  • Education is the disclosure of abilities, thinking, character and vocations.
  • Service is a mature form of leadership and social power.

The book of Fire describes the inner dynamics of such a person: Spark awakens, Flame purifies, Ray directs, Fire consolidates action, Torch transmits creative impulse, Shield maintains stability, Forge creates skill, Field connects people, Core holds meaning, Light transforms personal development into a calm creative force.

III. Family and community

The ideal state does not begin with a ministry, but with a stable family and a trusting community.

  • Support for the birth and upbringing of children as a strategic priority
  • affordable housing, education, medicine and family infrastructure;
  • intergenerational continuity and respect for elders;
  • development of local communities, partnerships, cooperatives and forms of mutual assistance;
  • Protecting children from exploitation, violence, drug addiction and destructive information environment.

IV. The State of Service and Strategic Development

The state of the highest order is strong, but not self-sufficient. Its power is measured by its ability to protect, organize, prevent threats, enforce fair rules, and create opportunities for development.

  • Rule of law and equality of responsibility;
  • long-term planning on the horizons of generation and century;
  • digital transparency of decisions in the protection of privacy;
  • assessment of state programs on real social effect;
  • competent public service and personal responsibility of managers;
  • A combination of a centralized strategy with strong local self-government.

In this architecture, EQUILIBRIUM can be seen as a loop of observation, analysis, prediction, and feedback: the system must see the consequences of decisions before errors become crises.

V. Justice and law

Justice is not the same outcome, but the honesty of rules, the protection of dignity, the proportionality of responsibility and the real opportunity for development.

  • a court independent of private interest and administrative pressure;
  • inevitability of responsibility for corruption and abuse of power;
  • priority of restoration of the violated right and compensation of damage;
  • citizens’ access to understandable and inexpensive legal protection;
  • A right that focuses not only on punishment, but also on preventing harm.

VI. The Economics of Creation

The Russian economy of the future should produce sovereignty, knowledge, quality of life and long-term value.

  • Real sector, engineering and manufacturing as a pillar of sustainability;
  • small and medium-sized enterprises as a space of initiative;
  • cooperation as a way to combine resources without losing independence;
  • a financial system that serves development rather than extracting rents from deficits;
  • assessment of projects on financial, social, environmental and technological effect;
  • reinvestment of natural rents into people, infrastructure, science and future generations.

Instead of contrasting the state, business and society, a cooperative model is formed: the state sets the strategic framework, business creates efficiency and product, science provides evidence, society forms the request and control of the result.

VII. Science, education and technological sovereignty

Russia of the highest order is a country where intelligence becomes a strategic resource, and science is part of everyday public administration.

  • Fundamental science as an investment in horizons that the market is not able to finance on its own;
  • strong engineering education and culture of invention;
  • unified system of support of talents from school to research and production centers;
  • Artificial intelligence as an assistant to man, not a mechanism of his subordination;
  • technological sovereignty in critical areas;
  • Open international scientific cooperation in the protection of national competencies.

VIII. Culture as the highest management system

Culture determines how a person considers what is worthy, beautiful, permissible and great. Therefore, cultural policy is not an application to the economy, but the formation of a civilization code.

  • Russian language and literature as a space of meaning and coherence of generations;
  • preservation of cultures of all peoples of Russia;
  • support art that can elevate, explore and unite;
  • architecture and urban environment, developing a sense of dignity and beauty;
  • Historical memory without turning history into an instrument of hatred;
  • Media focused not only on the retention of attention, but also on human development.

IX. Spiritual Diversity and the Common Ethical Foundation

Russia has historically been a meeting place for religious and philosophical traditions. The ideal world order does not require their mixing and does not create a new compulsory faith.

A common foundation can be recognized as human dignity, mercy, honesty, responsibility, respect for life, family, work, truth and peace.

Christianity, Islam, Buddhist tradition, Vedic heritage and other worldviews retain their own dogma. The state does not declare them the same, but creates a space for respectful dialogue and joint service to society.

X. Nature and biocenoses

Environmental policy is moving from elimination of consequences to continuous monitoring of the state of living systems.

  • basin management of water, forests and soils;
  • Biocenous monitoring of territories;
  • prevention of pollution instead of post-facto elimination of damage;
  • restoration of degraded lands and ecosystems;
  • clean energy where it is technologically and economically justified;
  • environmental effect as a mandatory parameter of major investment decisions.

XI. City of highest order

The ideal Russian city is not a set of buildings, but an environment that helps a person to be healthy, active, educated, connected with others and nature.

  • 15–30-minute availability of basic services without isolation of districts;
  • the connection between housing, work, education, culture, sports and nature;
  • priority of public spaces of human scale;
  • quiet, safe and green residential areas;
  • smart infrastructure without total digital surveillance;
  • district centers of community, creativity, training and mutual assistance;
  • architecture of beauty, durability and local identity.

XII. Health as the ability to live

The health system should be measured not by the number of medical procedures, but by the duration of an active, independent and meaningful life.

  • prevention and early detection;
  • affordable primary medicine;
  • rehabilitation and return of a person to full life;
  • Mass physical culture;
  • healthy food environment;
  • Scientific evidence-based technologies of personalized prevention.

XIII. Security

Security of the highest order is the ability to prevent a threat, not just respond to an already occurred crisis.

  • military and technological protection;
  • food, energy and infrastructure sustainability;
  • Cybersecurity and Critical Systems Protection;
  • demographic sustainability;
  • environmental safety;
  • public trust and the ability of society to act together in a crisis.

XIV. Information environment

A person should maintain freedom of thought in the conditions of algorithmic attention economy.

  • transparency of the principles of significant recommendatory systems;
  • protecting children from manipulative content;
  • Media literacy as a basic skill;
  • support of quality journalism, scientific communication and cultural content;
  • The right to privacy and control of personal data.

XV. Russia and the World

An ideal Russia does not base its greatness on the humiliation of others. Its international strength lies in its ability to offer solutions, to connect interests and to create public goods.

  • Sovereign equality of States;
  • inter-civilizational dialogue;
  • joint programs of science, ecology, space, health and infrastructure;
  • humanitarian cooperation and protection of cultural diversity;
  • A preference for long-term cooperation is a policy of constant confrontation.

XVI. Rhythm and ceremonial synchronous order

Society needs common rhythms, but they should not become a forced ideological ceremoniality. The meaning of synchronization is to strengthen community and memory through voluntary, understandable and meaningful actions.

  • day - personal creative action;
  • week - team and community synchronization;
  • month and quarter - public fixation of results;
  • year - public assessment of development and updating of priorities;
  • memorable and festive days - the connection of generations, gratitude and the image of the future.

XVII. Rays of Russia's Idealism

LuchManifestation in the state and society
TruthEvidence, honesty and freedom of knowledge
FairnessEqual dignity and proportionality of responsibility
Beautyharmonious cultural and spatial environment
LoveMercy, family, care and peace
FreedomIndependence of the individual and the country with responsibility for the consequences
Creationproduction of new knowledge, product and public good
Wisdomlong-term thinking and impact assessment
MinistryLeadership as Responsibility
Unityreconciliation of differences without destruction of identity
FutureResponsibility to Children and Generations
Natural harmonyRestoration and preservation of living systems
Spiritual DignityThe internal vertical of the person and respect for freedom of conscience

XVIII. Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

EQUILIBRIUM in the model of an ideal world order is not a replacement for the state and not a superstructure over a person. This is a principle and a possible digital infrastructure for harmonization.

  • Observation: see the state of man, territory, economy and nature through verifiable indicators;
  • understanding: linking data to causes and consequences;
  • Forecast: Identify threats and opportunities before critical events occur.
  • cooperation: to connect the state, science, business, society and territories;
  • execution: transfer the initiative to the project, resource, pilot and confirmed result;
  • feedback: measure the effect and adjust the course.

XIX. Transition: from the present to the ideal device

An ideal world order cannot be imposed by decree. It is formed by successive verifiable changes.

1. Diagnostics. a single map of demography, health, education, ecology, infrastructure, economy and trust.

2. Standards. definition of measurable criteria for human quality, environment, institutions and projects.

3. Pilots. cities, districts, industries and programs where the new model is tested in practice.

4. Verification. independent evaluation of real results and side effects.

5. Scaling. Distribution of only proven solutions.

6. Reversibility: the ability to stop or change decisions that create unacceptable harm.

7. Each major strategy is assessed by consequences at 10, 25 and 50 years.

XX. Ten criteria for an ideal Russia

  1. The child gets a chance to discover abilities regardless of the place of birth.
  2. The family is not afraid of the future and has space for life and education.
  3. Honest work allows you to live with dignity.
  4. The state institution is credible not with a slogan, but with the quality of work.
  5. Science becomes technology, production and the public good.
  6. The city helps to live, not to take up time and health.
  7. Natural systems are recovering faster than they are being destroyed.
  8. Culture increases the dignity and depth of a person.
  9. The strength of the country reduces the likelihood of war and increases the space for cooperation.
  10. Each generation transmits more opportunities, knowledge and a viable environment to the next than it has received itself.

Conclusion. Russia as a space of the highest order

Russia’s ideal world order is not an ideal country without conflicts and mistakes. It is a country with mechanisms to honestly see contradictions, correct mistakes and hold long-term meaning.

Its greatness consists not in the number of spaces subordinated to it, but as the space of life created by it.

Its strength lies in its ability to protect without degradation in fear, to develop without destroying nature, to preserve the tradition without abandoning the future, to create technology without losing a person.

Man is dignity. Family is continuity. The people are culture. The state is service. Economics is creation. Science is knowledge. Nature is life. The future is responsibility.

Other published edition: Ideal World Order Russia_Ideal_World Order_light_joyful.pptx · Web Text +

Bright Russia is a country of creation, dignity, culture, science and a long future.

The doctrine of higher order reality

Man • Family • State • Economy • Nature • Future

Russia as a space for coordinated development

MAIN SAMPLE

Not utopia, but the target state of the country, where the development of one level strengthens the others.

Person

Family

State

Economy

Nature

Dignity, disclosure of the gift, freedom with responsibility

Continuity, trust, happy childhood

Service, security, strategy and law

Creation, cooperation, fair exchange

The Living Basis of Civilization and the Limit of Responsibility

Meaning → cooperation → action → confirmed result → scaling

Man of the highest order

SYSTEM CENTER

A free, educated, healthy, cultured and responsible person is not a resource of the system, but its goal.

Dignity

Freedom

Creation

The unconditional basis of the attitude of the state, society and man to himself.

Not arbitrariness, but the ability to choose consciously and answer for consequences.

Work, learning, creativity and service become forms of disclosure of the human gift

Fire Book: Spark → Flame → Ray → Heat → Torch → Light

Family and community - the first contour of the country

BASIS OF TRUST

The ideal state does not begin with a ministry, but with a stable family and a living community.

Happy childhood

House

Safety, health, creativity, strong school.

A beautiful, accessible and peaceful space for living.

Generations

Community

The connection of children, parents and elders; respect for experience.

Cooperation, mutual assistance and local responsibility.

A strong Russia means millions of stable human ties.

The State of Service and Strategic Development

GOVERNANCE

The strength of a state is measured by its ability to protect, anticipate, organize, and create opportunities.

See

Anticipate

Agree

Execute

Data, indicators, feedback

Risks, scenarios, long horizon

State • business • science • society

Responsibility, timing, verifiable result

EQUILIBRIUM - the contour of observation, analysis, forecasting and feedback.

The Economics of Creation

WELCOME

The economy of the future produces not only GDP, but also sovereignty, knowledge, health, quality of the environment and the perspective of children.

Resources

Cooperation

Product

Effect

Reinvest

capital • labor • land • data

State • business • science • society

technology • service • infrastructure

Income • Health • Ecology • Knowledge

Future generations

Financial Efficiency + Public Use + Environmental Sustainability + Technological Sovereignty

Science, education and technological sovereignty

INTELLIGENCE

From school to the laboratory. From laboratory to production. From production to world leadership.

Talent

Science

Engineering

Production

Early identification of abilities

basic research

Design Schools

Human Assistant

own critical technologies

Intelligence becomes a strategic resource when the path from knowledge to product is short and honest.

Culture is the highest code of civilization

MEANS AND BEAUTY

Culture determines what society considers worthy, beautiful, acceptable and great.

Language and literature

Peoples of Russia

The Space of Meaning and Connectivity of Generations

Identity without mutual alienation

Art

Spiritual Dialogue

Elevation, research and unification

Respect for differences without mixing traditions

Beauty is not the ornament of the state. This is the environment in which a person is formed.

Nature and biocenoses

THE LIVING LAND

Ecology becomes not a separate industry, but the basic principle of designing a country.

Observation

Warning

Recovery

Balance

Biocenosis points and continuous monitoring

Identification of threats to irreversible damage

soil, water, forests, urban nature

Economy within the limits of ecosystem viability

Nature is not a storehouse of resources. It is the lifeblood of civilization and the responsibility to the future.

City of highest order

ENVIRONMENT OF LIFE

The city is not a collection of buildings. It is an everyday architecture of health, time, communication and dignity.

green and quiet neighborhoods

School, medicine and culture nearby

Public Spaces of Human Scale

Smart infrastructure without total surveillance

Community and Creativity Centers

The ideal city helps a person to live better - without forcing him to constantly overcome the environment.

Health and safety

RESPONSIBILITY

Health is the ability to live actively and meaningfully. Security is the ability to prevent threats.

Prevention

Infrastructure

early detection, food, movement

energy, water, transport, communication

Medicine

Cyber Wednesday

Affordable primary care

Protection of data and critical systems

Rehabilitation

Society

Return to a Full Life

Trust and Joint Action

A strong country warns of threats before they turn into a crisis.

Russia and the World

INTERNATIONAL ROLE

The greatness of a country is as the solutions it is capable of offering to the world.

ENVIRONMENT

Kosmos

SCIENCE

HEALTH

RUSSIA

CULTURE

INFRASTRUCTURE

Sovereignty + Equality + Inter-civilizational dialogue + Joint projects

12 Rays of Idealism of Russia

ETHIC NAVIGATION

A system of questions on which you can check the quality of decisions and the direction of development.

Truth

Fairness

Beauty

Love

Beam 01

Beam 02

Beam 03

Beam 04

Freedom

Creation

Wisdom

Ministry

Beam 05

Beam 06

Beam 07

Beam 08

Unity

Future

Nature

Dignity

Beam 09

Beam 10

Beam 11

Beam 12

Does the decision make the country more honest, fairer, more beautiful and stronger for the future?

Rhythm and ceremonial order

Synchronization

A common rhythm is needed not for coercion, but for coordinating efforts and maintaining long meaning.

DAY

WEEK

QUARTAL

YEAR

Personal creative action

Team and Community Synchronization

public recording of results

assessment of development and updating of priorities

Ceremoniality is only viable where it is voluntary, meaningful and unifying.

EQUILIBRIUM - nervous system of development

ARCHITECTURE

See condition → to understand the reasons → to predict → to cooperate → to perform → to correct.

UNDERSTANDING

FORECAST

OBSERVATION

EQUILIBRIUM

COOPERATION

FEEDBACK

EXECUTION

Initiative → Expertise → Co-operation → resource → Pilot → Confirmed result → Scaling

From the present to the ideal world order

TRANSITION

Not by decree - through consistent and verifiable changes.

Diagnostics

Standards

Pilots

Verification

Scaling

See the real state

We define quality criteria

We check the model in the territories

Measure the effect and consequences

We only distribute proven

Reversibility of solutions + independent estimate + after horizon 10, 25 and 50 years

10 signs of ideal Russia

VERIFICATION OF THE RESULT

The ideal should be checked: by person, family, institutions, city, nature and future.

The child reveals abilities regardless of the place of birth.

The city preserves the time and health of people.

The family is not afraid of the future.

Natural systems are being restored.

Honest work gives a decent life.

Culture increases dignity and depth.

Institutions are trustworthy in the quality of their work.

The power of the country reduces the likelihood of war.

Science is becoming technology and the public good.

The next generation gets more opportunities.

RUSSIA — SPACE OF THE HIGHER ORDER

Man is Dignity

Family - Continuity

People - culture

The State - Service

Economics - Creation

Science - Knowledge

Nature is life

The future is responsibility

Not a country without mistakes, but a country that knows how to see contradictions, correct them and keep a long meaning.

Published files

Platform · Full published text

Russia: The Sciences of the Future

Source Status: Primary Document

A strategic concept for developing a scientific and technological civilisation of the XXI century

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/rossiya-nauki-budushchego

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM • Russia • 2026

1. Summary

Russia has a rare combination of a fundamental scientific school, engineering culture, spatial scale, natural resources, space experience and historical ability to create large scientific and technological systems. The task of the next stage is to turn this heritage into a holistic architecture of the Future Sciences.

The sciences of the future are a set of fundamental, applied and civilizational disciplines focused not only on explaining the world, but also on the safe design of the future: man, society, biosphere, energy, digital environment and space expansion.

The proposed model is based on three contours: fundamental science; breakthrough technological disciplines; civilizational sciences. They are united by a common infrastructure of data, artificial intelligence, experimental polygons, national laboratories and implementation systems.

2. Strategic objective

To form by 2040 the Russian system of Future Sciences as a national environment for the production of knowledge, technologies and development models, capable of ensuring sovereignty, quality of life, environmental balance, international scientific leadership and long-term sustainability of the country.

3. Principles

  • Integrity: The relationship between basic science, engineering, nature, human, economics, and culture.
  • Evidence: Separation of scientifically confirmed results, hypotheses, and worldview concepts.
  • Sovereignty: Critical knowledge, data, and technology must have a Russian reproduction circuit.
  • Cooperation: Interdisciplinary consortia instead of isolation of scientific schools.
  • Long horizon: Programs for 15–30 years with intermediate measurable results.
  • Ethic: Technological capacity should be accompanied by risk and societal impact assessments.
  • Openness to the world: Scientific sovereignty does not mean isolation. Russia should be the center of international cooperation.

4. Architecture of the Future Sciences

The system consists of three interconnected circuits.

ContourPurposeExamples
I. FundamentalDiscovery of new laws of nature, life, information and complex systemsPhysics, Mathematics, Cosmology, Biology, Earth Sciences, Cognitive Sciences
II. TechnologicalCreation of platforms, materials, machines, energy and medicine of new generationAI, quantum technologies, robotics, bioengineering, new materials, energy
III. CivilizingDesigning a sustainable society and the safe use of technologySystem science, management science, bioeconomics, technology ethics, forecasting, cooperation sciences

5. Fundamental Sciences of the Future

5.1. New Physics and Cosmology

Investigation of matter, energy, plasma, gravity, extreme states of matter, high-energy physics, and cosmic processes. Priority is the fundamental basis for energy, materials science and space technologies.

5.2. Mathematics of Complex Systems

Nonlinear dynamics, network theory, multiscale modeling, control theory, causal analysis, computational mathematics, and new optimization techniques.

5.3. Life Sciences

Systems Biology, Genomics, Proteomics, Synthetic Biology, Biophysics, Evolutionary Mechanisms, and Biological Sustainability Management.

5.4. Earth and Biosphere Sciences

Climate, hydrosphere, soils, forests, biodiversity and the interface of natural and man-made systems. Transition from monitoring of individual parameters to observation of biocenoses as integral systems.

5.5. Cognitive Sciences

Study of the brain, intelligence, perception, memory, learning and human interaction with artificial intellectual systems.

5.6. Science of Information

Fundamental Limits of Computing, Coding Theory, Complexity, Information Security, and New Models of Computing Environments.

6. Breakthrough technological disciplines

  • Artificial intelligence of a new generation. Multimodal models, agent systems, scientific AI, trusted AI, man-machine teams, automation of scientific discoveries.
  • Quantum technologies. Quantum Computing, Sensors, Communication, Metrology, and Materials Modeling.
  • Robotics and Autonomous Systems. Industrial, service, medical, transport, underwater, arctic and space complexes.
  • New materials. Ultra-strong, lightweight, heat-resistant, biocompatible, functional, composite, metamaterials and high-purity materials.
  • Energy of the Future. Thermonuclear research, new generation nuclear technologies, storage devices, distributed generation, hydrogen solutions, intelligent power grids.
  • Bioengineering and medicine. Personalized medicine, regenerative technologies, cellular engineering, digital twins of the body, bioprinting and preventive diagnostics.
  • Neurotechnology. Neurointerfaces, neurorehabilitation, cognitive diagnostics and safe means of expanding human capabilities.
  • Space Engineering. Orbital infrastructure, new propulsion systems, autonomous stations, space robotics, communications and Earth monitoring.
  • Arctic technology. Autonomous energy, materials for extreme climate, robotic logistics, environmental monitoring and new types of northern settlements.

7. Civilizational Sciences

Science of System Management

Modeling of the state, regions, industries and infrastructures as interconnected systems.

The Science of Cooperation

Mechanisms of collective action, distributed responsibility and interaction of the state, science, business and society.

The Science of Sustainability

Evaluate the ability of systems to withstand crises, recover and adapt.

Biosphere Economy

Economic models that take into account the recovery of natural capital, resource cycles and environmental performance.

The Science of Forecasting

Scenario analysis, foresight, long-cycle modeling and early identification of technological, environmental and social risks.

Ethics of Technology

Safety standards for AI, biotechnology, neurotechnology, genetic interventions and autonomous systems.

Science of meanings and cultural codes

Research of values, historical memory, cultural stability and mechanisms of formation of long-term social motivation.

8. Russian megaprojects

  1. National AI for science is a single environment of scientific models, data and AI-agents for universities, research institutes and technology companies.
  2. Digital twin of the biosphere of Russia — Multilevel system of observation of the atmosphere, waters, soils, forests, biodiversity and man-made load.
  3. The network of biocenose landfills is a territory where natural and technological systems are observed as a single living complex.
  4. Quantum infrastructure of Russia — Network of centers of calculations, sensorics, metrology and secure communication.
  5. Materials 6N+ — National program of ultra-clean materials and technological chains for electronics, energy and space.
  6. Arctic 2050 - Range of autonomous energy, robotics, new settlements and environmentally friendly logistics.
  7. Space Industrial Orbit - The transition from individual spacecraft to a permanent orbital infrastructure.
  8. Human 2040 - National Program for Health, Cognitive Development, Personalized Prevention and Active Longevity.

9. The institutional model

A multi-level structure is proposed for implementation:

  • The National Council for the Future of Science - Strategic Priorities and Interagency Coordination.
  • Federal competence centers are core in key areas.
  • University research networks - training and basic research.
  • Research and production consortia - a quick translation of developments into prototypes.
  • Regional polygons - testing of technologies in real natural and industrial conditions.
  • The High Risk Research Foundation funds programs with high scientific risk and potentially breakthrough results.
  • The national scientific data system is a secure and standardized access to data and models.

10. EQUILIBRIUM as an integration loop

Within the larger EQUILIBRIUM system, the scientific circuit can perform the function of observation, comparison and coordination: to link data on the state of man, nature, infrastructure and economy; to support expert models; to form early warnings; to compare initiatives with resources; to record measurable results.

It is important to distinguish between scientific evidence and philosophical and worldview concepts. The scientific core EQUILIBRIUM uses reproducible data, testable hypotheses, standardized metrics, and independent verification.

11. The New Scientific Era

The researcher of the future should combine deep subject qualification with systemic thinking. The national educational model should prepare:

  • scientists who can work with AI as a research partner;
  • engineers of interdisciplinary systems;
  • architects of complex scientific and technological programs;
  • Data and modeling specialists;
  • experts on technological ethics and risks;
  • Entrepreneurial scientists who can turn research into products and infrastructure.

12. Stages of implementation

StagePeriodMain objectiveResult
I2026–2028Map of competences, centers, data and pilot megaprojectsUnified architecture and the first interdisciplinary polygons
II2029–2032Scaling research infrastructureNational Platforms AI, Biosphere, Quantum and Materials Science
III2033–2036Deep integration of science and productionSerial introduction of technologies and export of scientific and technological platforms
IV2037–2040International Leadership and Civilizational ProjectsRussia as one of the world centers of the Future Sciences

13. Outcome indicators

  • the proportion of critical scientific and technological chains reproduced domestically;
  • number of world-class research centers and facilities;
  • the speed of transition from a scientific result to an experimental sample;
  • the number of technologies that have undergone independent verification and industrial implementation;
  • the proportion of scientific data available in a standardized digital circuit;
  • international scientific consortia led by Russian organizations;
  • measurable environmental and social impact of science and technology programs.

14. Final formula

FUNDAMENTAL KNOWLEDGE + ENGINEERING ME + AI + BIOSPHERE RESPONSIBILITY + CULTURE + COOPERATION

The sciences of the future should become not a separate branch, but a new organization of national development. Their task is to give Russia the ability to see further, to understand deeper, to create faster and to be responsible for the consequences of its own technological power.

Other published edition: SCIENCES OF THE FUTURE Russia_Sciences_Future_presentation.pptx · web text +

Strategic concept of scientific and technological civilization XXI centuries

FUNDAMENTALITY

TECHNOLOGIES

CIVILIZATION

EQUILIBRIUM

Russia should become one of the centers of the Future Sciences

STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK

Not a separate industry, but a new national development organization

See more

Understanding Deeper

Create faster

Responsible for the consequences

foresight, models, early warning

Basic Research and Systems Science

AI for science, polygons, production cooperation

ethics, biosphere, safety of technologies

Formula: Basic knowledge + engineering power + AI + Biosphere Responsibility + Culture + Co-operation

The Three Outlines of the Future Science

ARCHITECTURE

A single system - from the discovery of patterns to the design of civilizational stability

III

FUNDAMENTAL

TECHNOLOGICAL

CIVILIZATION

Discovers new patterns of nature, life, information and complex systems

Creates platforms, materials, machines, energy and medicine of the new generation

Designs a sustainable society and rules for the safe use of technology

• Physics and Cosmology

• System management

• Mathematics of Complex Systems

• Quant

• Biosphere Economics

• Life Sciences

• Robotics

• Technology Ethics

• Cognitive Sciences

• Bioengineering

• Science of cooperation

Fundamental Sciences of the Future

CONTOUR I

Russian power begins where new knowledge is created, not just borrowed technology

New Physics

Mathematics of Complex Systems

Life Sciences

Matter • Energy • Plasma • Extreme States

Nonlinearity • Network • Causality • Control

Genomics • Systemic Biology • Synthetic Biology

Biosphere and Earth

Cognitive Sciences

Science of Information

climate • water • soil • forests • biodiversity

Brain • Training • Intelligence • person–AI

calculations • complexity • coding • security

Breakthrough technological disciplines

CONTOUR II

Directions that form the new industrial base of Russia

Artificial Intelligence

Quantum technologies

Robotics

New materials

Energy of the Future

Bioengineering and medicine

Neurotechnology

Space Engineering

Arctic technologies

The key transition: from individual developments → to platforms, production chains and scalable technological systems

Civilizational Sciences

CONTOUR III

Technological power without management science creates new risks

System management

Biosphere Economy

States, regions and industries as interconnected systems

Economics with natural capital and resource cycles

The Science of Cooperation

Forecasting

Collective action of the state, science, business and society

Foresight, scenarios, long cycles, early signals

The Science of Sustainability

Ethics and Meanings

The ability of systems to withstand crises and recover

Technology security, culture, values, social motivation

Eight Russian megaprojects

MASSTABING

Projects-Links between basic science, industry and national objectives

National AI for Science

Digital double of the biosphere of Russia

Network of biocenous landfills

Quantum infrastructure of Russia

Materials 6N+

Arctic 2050

Space Industrial Orbit

Person 2040

Digital double of the biosphere of Russia

FLAGMAN PROJECT

From monitoring individual indicators to observing living systems as a whole

ATMOSPHERE

WATER

SOIL

PLANTS

ANIMALS

HUMANITY

Data → causal models → prediction → warning → recovery actions

Satellites

Sensors

Bioindicators

AI-model

Regional polygons

National AI for Science

FLAGMAN PROJECT

AI should accelerate discovery, not replace scientific method

DATA

MODELS

AGENTS

EXPERIMENT

VERIFICATION

Scientific data sets and standards

Industry and fundamental models

AI-researchers and assistants

Laboratories and test sites

Reproducibility and independent verification

Principle: Scientific Evidence Above Algorithmic Confidence

The institutional model

ORGANIZATION

Scientific sovereignty requires not isolation, but the ability to reproduce critical knowledge and technology.

NATIONAL COUNCIL

Priorities •

FEDERAL COMPETENCE CENTERS

fundamental directions • infrastructure

UNIVERSITIES AND SCIENCES

Personnel • Research • Research Schools

SCIENTIFIC AND PRODUCTION CONSORTS

prototypes • introduction • industry

REGIONAL POLYGONS

Real-world validation • scaling

EQUILIBRIUM - integration circuit

SYSTEM

Linking scientific data, systems status, initiatives, resources and measurable results

OBSERVATION

EXPERTISE

EQUILIBRIUM

MODELING

COOPERATION

EARLY

WARNING

Scientific core: reproducible data • testable hypotheses • standardized metrics • independent verification

Explorer of the Future

KADRA

The new scientific era requires not only new installations, but also a new type of professional.

Deep Objectivity

Systemic thinking

Work with AI

strong fundamental base

Understanding the links between disciplines

AI as research partner

Engineering culture

Ethics and Responsibility

Scientific Entrepreneurship

Transition from idea to prototype

Risk and impact assessment

Transfer of knowledge to products and infrastructure

Road map 2026–2040

IMPLEMENTATION

Four consecutive stages - from the competency map to international leadership

2026–2028

2029–2032

2033–2036

2037–2040

ARCHITECTURE

INFRASTRUCTURE

INTEGRATION

LEADERSHIP

Map of competences, centers, data and pilot megaprojects

National Platforms AI, Biosphere, Quantum and Materials Science

Deep connection of science and production, serial introduction

Russia is one of the world centers of the Future Sciences

How to Measure Success

METRICS

The sciences of the future should not be judged by the number of declarations, but by the ability to create a reproducible result

Critical Chains

World Centres

Speed of implementation

Proportion of technologies reproduced within the country

Number of world-class facilities and research centres

time from the scientific result to the prototype

Verification

Scientific data

International leadership

Number of technologies with independent confirmation

share of data in a standardized digital circuit

consortiums led by Russian organizations

RUSSIA — SCIENTIFIC CIVILIZATION OF THE FUTURE

Science should enable a country to see further, understand deeper, create faster, and be responsible for the consequences of its own technological power.

KNOWLEDGE

CREATION

EQUALITY

COOPERATION

EQUILIBRIUM

Published files

Platform · Full published text

CREATING A BANKING AND FINANCIAL SYSTEM

Source Status: Primary Document

“SFERA — A World Without Borders”

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/sfera-banking-financial-system

Open on the site

Russian regulated core • international partner network • cooperative economy • social development

Working text for strategic discussion

Summary of the concept

SFERA - a world without borders is proposed to be created as a distributed banking and financial ecosystem connecting state tasks, private capital, cooperative participation and social programs. The system is not an attempt to replace national currencies, central banks or licensed credit institutions. Its purpose is to create a compatible environment in which projects receive capital, settlement infrastructure, risk management and confirmation of social results.

Target result

• strong Russian banking core for PPP, infrastructure and industrial cooperation;

• network of cooperative financial organizations serving participants and territories;

• social product line for families, veterans, entrepreneurs and municipal programs;

• international contour of partner banks, funds and project companies;

• common standards ECO-PPA, ESG-IR, compliance, asset valuation and digital evidence;

1. Mission and principles

Mission SFERA is to provide access to responsible capital for projects that strengthen the individual, family, territory, economy and natural environment, while maintaining financial stability and legitimacy in each jurisdiction.

PrincipleContents
LegalityThe license and the permitted organizational form precede the operations.
Separate liabilityThe client always knows to which legal entity the funds are transferred and who carries the risk.
EvidenceThe asset, cash flow and social outcome are confirmed by independent procedures.
Equitable distribution of riskIncome and liability are not broken; loss is not automatically transferred to the state or citizens.
Open cooperationParticipants pool resources without mixing units, contributions, investments and charitable funds.
Technological sustainabilityData, calculations, and critical functions are protected, backed up, and controlled by humans.

2. System architecture

SFERA is built as a coordination system. Banking, investment, payment, cooperative and project functions are distributed among specialized entities.

ContourInstituteFunction
The Russian CoreA bank with a universal licenseAccounts, calculations, loans, guarantees, project financing.
DevelopmentManagement company and fundsInfrastructural, productive and social investments.
CooperationCooperatives and alliancesShares, joint purchases, sales, economic mutual assistance.
ProjectsSPV / concession companiesIsolation of risks and implementation of each major project.
ProtectionGuarantee and reserve fundsGuarantees, coverage of the first losses, anti-crisis support.
EvidenceCenter ECO-PPA / ESG-IRExamination, impact verification, register of results.
TechnologyPlatform operator SFERAData, integrations, registries, reporting and digital auditing.
International BeltNational banks and partner fundsCross-border settlements and co-financing under local law.

3. Russian adjustable core

In Russia, “a PPP bank”, “a cooperative bank” and “a social bank” should be considered as functional specializations, and not as separate types of banking license. Banking operations are carried out by a licensed credit institution; the remaining participants perform only functions legally permitted by it.

Three product lines

1. PPP Bank and Development. Financing of energy, ecology, transport, construction, rehabilitation, digital and municipal infrastructure.

2. Co-operative circuit. Maintenance of production chains, local economies, cooperative members, supply, sales and mutual support.

3. The social line. Available financial products for citizens, families, veterans, people with disabilities, social enterprises and small territories.

4. The international system

The international level is formed not by a single universal license, but by a network of nationally regulated institutions united by treaties, standards and a compatible technological platform.

LevelRoleEntry Model
RussiaAdjustable, methodological and technological coreOwn bank or purchase of an existing bank after a comprehensive audit.
EAEU / Union StateThe First Compatibility BeltPartner banks, national currencies, joint funds and project standards.
BRICS+Investment and settlement beltConsortiums, correspondent relations, funds, project offices.
Global projectsEnergy, water, food, ecology, territoryNational operators, SPV, development banks and independent verification.

General and separate

Common to the networkDivided by jurisdiction
Mission, brand, standards, technological protocol, risk classifier, project register, ECO-PPA, ESG-IR.Licenses, balance sheets, capital, client money, deposit insurance, reserves, reporting, bankruptcy.

5. Financial model and instruments

The system uses a multi-channel capital model. The source of funding is selected for the duration, risk and cash flow of the project; short-term funds of the population are not directed directly to long-term illiquid assets.

ToolPurposeKey condition
Bank loanWorking capital and project stagesPayability, security, risk limits.
Project financingInfrastructure and PPPsIsolated SPV and projected cash flow.
Bonds / CFALong-term capital raisingRisk Disclosure, Legal Release, Debt Service.
PaiCooperative participationRights cooperative member are separate from bank deposits.
Funds and equity participationGrowth and innovationThe investor takes entrepreneurial risk.
Guarantees and first lossesReducing Risk for Senior InvestorsThe limit, price and source of coverage are determined in advance.
ECO-PPALong-term contract of result and deliveryMeasured effect, verification, clear payer.

Units of account

At the first stage, it is advisable to use the internal units of SFERA, MURDE or SUR as an index, a measure of value, an accounting unit, a digital right or an indicator of social and environmental impact. They are not declared legal tender and do not replace national currencies.

6. Economic cycle SFERA

1. The applicant formulates the problem, solution, territory and expected result.

2. Expertise - check the law, technology, market, team, assets and impact.

3. Structuring - a legal model is selected, SPV, contracts and sources of capital.

4. Risk decision: An independent risk center sets limits, covenants, and reserves.

5. Financing - capital is received in stages when the conditions are met.

6. Implementation - the digital circuit fixes costs, results and deviations.

7. Verification - confirmed cash flow and socio-ecological effect.

8. Scaling - a successful model is replicated through a network of partners.

7. Management, risk and protection of participants

OrganCredentials
System Council SFERAMission, strategy, standards and admission of partners.
Board of Directors of the BankCapital, risk appetite, customer guidance and protection.
Credit / Investment CommitteeDecisions on transactions within approved limits.
Independent risk centerCredit, market, operational, country and model risk.
Compliance and AML/CFTClients, beneficiaries, sources of funds, sanctions and corruption risks.
Internal auditIndependent assessment of management, control and compliance procedures.
Social and Expert CouncilControl of mission, social orientation and conflicts of interest.

Three lines of defense

1. Business and operational units own the risk and are responsible for primary control.

2. Risk management, compliance, and internal control independently set rules and limits.

3. Internal audit checks both lines and reports to the board of directors.

8. Digital Platform SFERA

The platform provides a single information language for the system, but does not become an unlimited holder of client funds. Financial transactions are executed by licensed participants, and the platform connects them through secure interfaces.

• single passport of the project and asset;

• register of rights, obligations, pledges and restrictions;

• KYC/KYB and identification of beneficiaries;

• Project scoring and monitoring covenant;

• access separation and immutable solution log;

• reporting ECO-PPA/ESG-IR and contribution to the SDGs;

• redundancy, recovery and possibility of change of operator;

• responsible use of AI with mandatory human responsibility;

9. Criteria for project selection

BlockQuestion of admission
RightAre the rights to the asset, land, technology, revenue and security issued?
EconomyIs there a confirmed demand and sufficient cash flow?
TeamAre there any competencies, responsibilities and transparent beneficiaries?
RiskAre stress scenarios, loss limits and exit plans defined?
ImpactAre social, territorial and environmental outcomes measurable?
ScalingIs it possible to repeat the model in other regions without losing quality?

10. Road map of creation

StageTimeframeResult
I. Doctrine and Audit0–3 monthsMission, founders, asset map, legal model, five-year economy, regulatory position.
II. Core Design3–6 monthsBank/partner selection, target architecture, risk policy, digital registry prototype.
III. The Russian Pilot6–12 monthsOne region or product line, 3–5 projects, independent audit and stress test.
IV. EEU12–24 monthsPartner banks, settlements in national currencies, a joint fund and the first cross-border pilot.
V. BRICS+24–36 monthsConsortiums, project offices, investment platform, external verification.
VI. International Network36–60 monthsNational operators, standard ECO-PPA, multilateral guarantee mechanism.

11. Performance indicators

MeasurementIndicators
Financial sustainabilityCapital, liquidity, asset quality, latency, concentration, reserve coverage.
Project resultTerm, budget, input capacity, cash flow, implementation of the covenant.
CooperationNumber of participants, turnover within the network, share of local suppliers, income cooperative members.
Social impactJobs, access to services, family cost reduction, rehabilitation and inclusion.
EcologyEnergy conservation, water, waste, emissions, reclaimed areas and biodiversity.
TrustComplaints, terms of settlement, transparency of commissions, satisfaction of participants.

12. Decisions of the First Strategic Council

1. Approve the mission and boundaries of the system "SFERA - a world without borders".

2. Determine the Russian anchor organization and the composition of the initiators.

3. Conduct a legal, financial and technical audit of assets claimed in equity or collateral.

4. Choose a model: the establishment of a new bank, the acquisition of an existing or strategic partnership.

5. Form risk center, project office and center ECO-PPA / ESG-IR.

6. Select 3–5 pilot projects with confirmed cash flow.

7. Prepare a regulatory memorandum and start preliminary consultations.

8. Approve the budget of the first stage, responsible and control points for 12 months.

Conclusion

“SFERA — a world without borders” can become a financial infrastructure for creative development if trust is based not on declarations, but on law, capital, liquidity, transparent management and provable result. The Russian regulated core ensures sustainability; the cooperative circuit involves people and territories; the social line directs products to human development; the international network opens access to partners and capital without blurring national responsibility.

Other published edition: Creation of the banking and financial system SFERA_banking_financial_system.pptx · web text +

SFERA - A World Without Borders

Russian regulated core • cooperative economy • social development • international compatibility

2026 | Working Edition for Strategic Discussion

DIVISIONS

WHY A NEW ARCHITECTURE IS NEEDED

There's capital. There are projects. There is no linking system.

Assets are not converted into liquid cash flow

Long-term projects are funded by inadequate resources

Between public tasks, private capital, cooperatives and social initiatives.

Social Impact Not Confirmed by Financial Evidence

International cooperation fragmented across jurisdictions

SFERA connects initiative, capital and confirmed result

ANSWER SFERA

Initiative

Expertise

Capital

Implementation

Scale

A unified system - by mission, standards, technology and evidence. Separate legal entities - under licenses, capital and responsibility.

One core of coordination — seven specialized institutions

TARGET ARCHITECTURE

BANK

FUNDS

COOPERATION

SPV

WARRANTY

ECO-PPA

PLATFORM

Accounts • credits • guarantees

Investments • equity

Shares • chains • sales

PPP • Risk Isolation

First loss • reserves

Verification of the result

Registries • data • audit

SFERA coordinates the system, but does not mix functions and risks in one legal entity.

Three product lines operate on the same banking basis

RUSSIAN NUCLEAR CONTROL

Bank PPP

COOPERATIVE CONTOUR

BANK

WITH UNIVERSAL

LICENSE

Infrastructure • Energy • Ecology

Participants • production • territories

SOCIAL LINE

Families • veterans • services available

International scale is created by a network of national licenses

INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM

RUSSIA

adjustable and technological core

EEU / UNITED STATES

The First Compatibility Belt

BRICS+

Investment and Settlement Belt

GLOBAL PROJECTS

national operators and SPV

Common standards and technology. Separate capital, client money, reserves and liability.

Each period and risk is its source of capital

FINANCIAL MODEL

Bonds

the CFA

Guarantees

Project

Finance.

Funds /

Share

Credit

Pai

ECO-PPA

Short-term funds of the population are not directed directly to long-term illiquid assets.

Five tools - five different promises to the participant

LEGAL CLEANITY

INCLUDING

PAY

INVESTMENT

DIGITAL LAW

VSECOS

Returnability

and insurance

Membership

and cooperative rights

Income and Risk

Capital

requirement within the

Law

Targeted

financing

No tool is disguised as another in the contract, accounting or advertising.

Capital is released as proven progress

ECONOMIC CYCLE SFERA

Application

Expertise

Structure

Risk-solution

Financing

Monitoring

Verification

Scale

Funds come in stages - when the conditions are met, the covenant and the confirmation of the result.

Decision, risk and control are divided into three lines of protection

MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION

BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS

own risk • primary control

RISK • COMPLAINS • AML

Set limits and restrictions

INTERNAL AUDIT

Independently check both lines

Over the System: Board of Directors • Risk Committee • Public Advisory Board

Platform SFERA is a single language, not a holder of all money

DIGITAL PLATFORM

Rights and pledges

Scoring

SINGLE

PASSPORT

PROJECT

KYC / KYB

Covenants

ECO-PPA

Audit of decisions

The project goes through six gates before receiving capital

PROJECT SHIPPING

LAW

ECONOMY

TEAM

RISK

EFFECT

MASSHTAB

Net Rights

cash flow

Competences

Limit of loss

measurable effect

Repeatability

The value of an asset does not replace liquidity, legal purity and the ability to service liabilities.

From doctrine to international network — in 60 months

ROAD MAP

0–3 months

3–6 months

6–12 months

12–24 months

24–36 months

36–60 months

Doctrine

and audit

Architecture

Cores

Russian

Pilot

EEU

BRICS+

International

Network

Pilot: single region or product line • 3–5 projects • independent audit • stress test

First Strategic Council to approve eight decisions

DECISION ON STARTING

Mission and borders

Anchoring organization

Audit of assets

Model of Bank

Risk Center

3–5 pilots

Regulatory Memorandum

Budget for 12 months

The goal of the first stage is to create a legally pure Russian core and prove the model on real projects.

The financial system of creative development

FORMULA SFERA

The Sovereign Core

+ cooperation

+ social mission

+ International Compatibility

+ Evidence

The next step is the regulatory and investment design of the Russian pilot.

Published files

Platform · Full published text

Social Marketplace

Source Status: Primary Document

The concept of a new type of social and cooperative platform

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/socialnyi-marketplace

Open on the site

Participation economy • Social Initiatives Fund • Cooperation • Measured result

Project "Social Cooperation" Version 1.0 — 22 August 2026

1. Summary

Social marketplace is a digital platform that combines goods, services, social initiatives, cooperative projects, volunteering and targeted financing mechanisms into a single system. Its key difference from the usual marketplace is that each economic operation can create both commercial, social and social effects.

The platform should become an infrastructure in which a citizen, entrepreneur, cooperative, NGO, foundation, municipality, enterprise or development institution can not only buy and sell, but also pool resources, support initiatives, form project teams and see a demonstrable result.

2. Purpose of the platform

  • create a single digital space for socially oriented trade, services and mutual assistance;
  • Ensure a sustainable flow of resources to the Social Initiatives Fund;
  • give social projects a clear path from idea to financing and execution;
  • create a transparent system of confirmation of social effect;
  • reduce transaction costs between citizens, businesses, NGOs, cooperatives and state institutions;
  • form an economy of participation in which the contribution of an individual or organization becomes measurable and visible.

3. Target model

Social marketplace is built as a two-circuit system. The first circuit is responsible for economic turnover, the second for the transformation of part of the created value into a social effect.

ContourFunctionKey result
EconomicGoods, services, orders, calculations, logistics, cooperation offersTurnover, income, jobs, loading of participants
SocialFoundation, initiatives, grants, volunteering, targeted fees, community programsMeasurable social and environmental impact

4. Link to the Social Initiatives Fund

The Social Initiatives Fund is not an external charitable application to the marketplace, but a built-in institution for redistributing part of the created economic value into socially significant projects.

4.1. Sources of Foundation Formation

  • the share of the commission of the marketplace directed to social programs;
  • voluntary contributions from buyers and sellers;
  • corporate co-financing programs;
  • targeted donations and grants;
  • income from special socially oriented product and service categories;
  • partnership programs of banks, insurers, logistics and technology companies;
  • Reimbursable financing mechanisms for individual project models, if permitted by legal design.

4.2. Logic of funds movement

  1. The buyer makes a deal.
  2. The platform retains the established commission.
  3. A certain part of the commission is automatically reserved in the social contour.
  4. The buyer or seller may additionally make a voluntary contribution.
  5. Funds are allocated to approved areas or selected initiatives.
  6. The initiative is tested, receives funding and benchmarks.
  7. After execution, confirmation of the result is published.

5. Participants in the system

ParticipantRoleWhat Gets
CitizenBuyer, performer, volunteer, author of the initiativeGoods, services, support, reputation, participation
EntrepreneurVendor and Service ProviderDemand, customers, social reputation
CooperativeOrganizer of joint production and salesMarket, procurement, orders, cooperation relations
NPO / FundOperator of social programsFunding, audience, performers
CompanyPartner, customer, donor, supplierESG/social effect, market and trust
Municipality / RegionCustomer and partner programsInitiative implementation mechanism and feedback
ExpertVerification, evaluation, mentoringRemuneration, status, project portfolio

6. Social Marketplace Architecture

1. Catalog of goods and services

Social enterprises, cooperatives, local producers, professional services, social services.

2. Needs Exchange

Requests from citizens, organizations, territories and social groups.

3. Exchange of initiatives

Ideas and projects that require team, resources, expertise or funding.

4. Social Initiatives Fund

Accumulation and distribution of funds according to approved rules.

5. Cooperative module

Search for partners, joint purchases, production chains, project consortia.

6. Reputation and trust

Confirmed transactions, quality of execution, public contribution, project history.

7. Verification of the result

Documents, photos/videos, geodata, acts, expert confirmation, impact indicators.

8. Accounting and financial module

Payments, commissions, separate flow accounting, refunds, target fees.

9. Analytics

Demand, supply, deficits, regional needs, programme effectiveness.

10. Personal account

Orders, contribution, reputation, initiatives, projects, history of participation.

7. Economic model

The economy of the platform should be diversified. Dependence solely on donations makes the system unstable; dependence solely on the commission turns it into a normal commercial marketplace.

Source of incomeMechanicsPurpose
Commission on transactionsPercentage or fixed rateOperating expenses and social contour
SubscriptionsEnhanced functions for organizationsPlatform support
B2B/B2G servicesProcurement, cooperation, analytics, project officesPlatform Revenue
Logistics and financial servicesAffiliate RewardsReducing the cost of infrastructure
PromotionEthical and marked promotion of participantsMarketing revenue
Co-financingCorporate and Institutional ProgramsIncreased social impact

8. Model of trust and reputation

Instead of a single opaque “social rating”, it is recommended to use a multi-component reputation that reflects only confirmed behavior within the platform and does not limit the basic rights of the participant.

  • quality and completion of transactions;
  • timely fulfillment of obligations;
  • confirmed social contribution;
  • participation in initiatives and volunteer programs;
  • Expert competence;
  • transparency of the organization and reporting;
  • responses of counterparties with protection from manipulation.

9. The Life Cycle of Social Initiative

  1. Registering a problem or idea.
  2. Verification of the author and basic data.
  3. Classification by direction and territory.
  4. Expert assessment of need and feasibility.
  5. Formation of the budget, team and results indicators.
  6. Public placement on the platform.
  7. Collection of resources: money, goods, services, volunteers, experts.
  8. Decision on funding.
  9. Execution.
  10. Verification of result.
  11. Publication of the report.
  12. Scaling a successful model.

10. Marketplace Categories

  • food and local producers;
  • goods of cooperatives and social enterprises;
  • repair, household and professional services;
  • education and mentoring;
  • healthy lifestyle and rehabilitation services - within the limits of applicable law;
  • Environmental goods and services;
  • care and assistance to people;
  • Work, employment and temporary assignments;
  • social tourism and cultural projects;
  • equipment and services for NGOs and social institutions;
  • joint purchases;
  • charitable and social initiatives.

11. Relationship with the cooperation model

The social marketplace should become a point of entry into the wider social cooperation system. Marketplace is responsible for supply and demand; the cooperative circuit is for the unification of participants; The Foundation is for supporting socially significant initiatives; the digital system is for transparency and measuring the result.

12. Management

Supervisory Board

Strategy, principles, conflict of interest, control of public mission.

Management Board / Platform Operator

Product, operations, partners, finance, development.

Expert Council

Evaluation of initiatives, methods, industry conclusions.

The Foundation Committee

Financing decisions and control of targeted use.

The User Council

Feedback from citizens, entrepreneurs and cooperatives.

Contour of compliance

KYC/KYB, AML/CFT, data protection, contractual discipline, dispute resolution.

13. Legal framework

The specific legal design depends on the jurisdiction and the cash flow model. The commercial operator of the marketplace, the fund and the cooperative circuit should be legally and accountingly separated, so as not to mix commercial revenue, target revenues and unit/cooperative funds.

  • contracts of offers and rules of the marketplace;
  • the regime of personal data and information security;
  • requirements for online payments and cash discipline;
  • rules for receiving and spending donations and earmarked funds;
  • Compliance of sellers and suppliers;
  • protection of consumer rights;
  • Regulations for financing initiatives;
  • Conflict of interest policy and anti-corruption procedures.

14. MVP: first working version

The first release should prove not the number of functions, but the operability of the full cycle: transaction → social contribution → selected initiative → funding → confirmed result.

BlockMVPLater
CatalogueProducts and services 30–100 participantsMass Catalogue
PaymentOne payment providerMulti-Acquiring/Financial Services
Fund3–5 initiativesHundreds of programs
ReputationTransactions + reviews + participationExpanded Evidence Model
CooperationApplications for partnershipAutomated Chains
AnalysisBasic indicatorsForecasting and regional panels

15. Performance indicators

  • GMV and the number of completed transactions;
  • percentage of repeat buyers;
  • number of active sellers and service providers;
  • Amount of funds allocated to social initiatives;
  • the proportion of initiatives with a confirmed result;
  • the cost of achieving a unit of social result;
  • number of jobs and project employments created;
  • volume of cooperation transactions;
  • time from registration of the initiative before the start of execution;
  • level of trust and the share of disputes resolved;
  • The amount of external co-financing attracted.

16. Road map

Stage 1. Design

Product model, legal scheme, financial flows, regulations, brand and UX.

Stage 2. Pilot

One area or one industry area, 30–100 Vendors, 3–5 Social Initiatives.

Stage 3. Checking the economy

Repeated transactions, unit-economy, stock contour, measurement of the result.

Stage 4. Cooperative expansion

Joint procurement, production chains, employment and project consortia.

Stage 5. Regional Scaling

Connecting municipalities, companies, NGOs and development institutions.

Stage 6. Federal Platform

Common standards, API, interregional programs, analytical outline.

17. Principles of the system

  • Voluntary participation;
  • transparency of cash flows;
  • priority of the real result over declarations;
  • separation of commercial and targeted funds;
  • protection of the participant and his data;
  • Equal access to basic infrastructure;
  • cooperation instead of artificial competition where joint action is more effective;
  • local independence with uniform platform standards;
  • social and environmental impact;
  • scaling only models that have proven their effectiveness.

18. Final architecture

Social marketplace can become a practical economic core of the system of social cooperation. Through it, everyday activities — buying, selling, labor, ordering a service, volunteering, or supporting a project — are transformed into a manageable stream of resources for the development of society.

The goal of the platform is to form an infrastructure in which social utility ceases to be a side effect of the economy and becomes one of the measurable results of each significant operation.

Other published edition: SOCIAL MARKETPLACE Economy of participation, cooperation and measurable social result Social_marketplace_presentation.pptx · web text +

Marketplace → Social Initiatives Fund → Cooperative execution → Confirmed result

Why we need a social marketplace

Not another online store, but the infrastructure of the social economy

Issue addressed

Social initiatives are separate from the everyday economy and depend on one-off sources of funding.

Decision

Embed social impact directly into transactions, services, employment and cooperation processes.

Result

A constant flow of resources into initiatives, transparency, reputation and scaling of working models.

Each economic operation can create both commercial, social and social effects.

Basic architecture

Two interconnected circuits

Economic contour

Goods • Services • Orders • calculations • Logistics • Employment • cooperative proposals

Social contour

Fund • initiatives • target fees • volunteering • social programs • verification of the result

How does the link with the Social Initiatives Fund work?

Full cycle from transaction to confirmed result

Deal

Platform Commission

Social contribution

Choice of initiative

Financing

Implementation

Verification

Scaling

The Fund is not an appendix to the marketplace, but a built-in institution for redistributing part of the created value into socially significant projects.

Participants in the system

One platform, different roles

Citizen

buyer • performer • volunteer

Entrepreneur

seller • service provider

Cooperative

production • sales • purchases

NPO / Fund

Social programs

Company

customer • partner • co-financing

Municipality

Public tasks • territory

Expert

Rating • Verification • Mentoring

Institute for Development

resources • scaling

Key Platform Modules

From the shop window to the cooperation circuit

Catalog of goods and services

Needs Exchange

Exchange of initiatives

Social Initiatives Fund

Cooperative module

Reputation and trust

Verification of the result

Accounting and financial module

Analysis

Member Account

Economic model

Sustainability is provided by several sources of income

Commission on transactions

basic operating revenue

Subscriptions

Enhanced functions of organizations

B2B / B2G services

procurement, analytics, design offices

Partner Financial Services

acquiring, logistics, insurance

Promotion

Ethical and Marked

Co-financing

Corporate and Institutional Programs

Model of trust

Not a single “social rating”, but a confirmed reputation

quality and completion of transactions

Timeliness of obligations

Confirmed social contribution

Participation in initiatives

Expert competence

Transparency and accountability

Principle

Reputation reflects only proven behavior within the platform and should not limit basic human rights or organization.

Life cycle of initiative

From problem to scalable solution

Problem / Idea

Data validation

Expert assessment

Budget + team + KPI

Public accommodation

Resource collection

Financing

Implementation

Verification

Scaling

Linkages with social cooperation

Marketplace becomes the economic core of a wider system

Social Marketplace

demand, supply, transactions

Social Initiatives Fund

Targeted resources

Co-operative execution

teams, production, services

Digital Confirmation

data, documents, KPI

Scaling

territories, industries, programs

MVP

The first version should prove the full cycle, not the number of functions

Participants

30–100

Social Initiatives

3–5

Payment Provider

1

territory or industry

1

Transparent Flow

100%

transaction → deposit → result

1 cycle

Road map

From Design to Federal Platform

Design — model, law, financial flows, UX

Pilot — participants, deals, initiatives

Checking the economy - repeated transactions and unit-economy

Cooperative expansion — procurement, supply chains, employment

Regional scaling — municipalities, NGOs, companies

Federal platform — standards, API, analytics

Key performance indicators

What should be measured from day one

GMV and number of transactions

Repeated Buyers

active sellers

Amount of Fund

Initiatives with confirmed results

unit cost of social result

Jobs and Project Employment

Volume of cooperation transactions

time from application to execution

Level of trust and dispute resolution

Principles of the system

Conditions without which the model loses confidence

Volunteerism

Transparent Flows

real result

Separation of commercial and targeted funds

Data protection

Equal access

Cooperation where it is more effective

Local independence

Verifiability of effect

scaling of proven models

PEOPLE + BUSINESS + COOPERATION + FUND + INITIATIVES + TRUST + TRANSPARENCY = SOCIAL MARKETPLACE

Final model

Social utility becomes a measurable result of economic activity

Practical economic core of the social cooperation system.

Published files

Platform · Full published text

SFERA: A Shared Space for Initiatives for a Common Future

Source Status: Primary Document

From a public idea to an expert solution, cooperation, pilot, proven result and scaling

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/sfera-edinoe-prostranstvo-initsiativ

Open on the site

Basic edition • 2026

1. Strategic definition

SFERA is a public communication and design-navigation platform that integrates the initiatives of citizens, communities, science, business, development institutions and the state into coordinated programs of practical action.

Mission

To turn disparate ideas and needs into feasible, measurable and replicable solutions aimed at the development of man, territories, economy and natural environment.

A vision of the future

A society in which a useful initiative is not lost between departments and organizations, but goes a clear path from the idea to the confirmed social result. Each participant contributes, acts within the authority and is responsible for the commitments made.

Principles

  • unity of purpose in the division of roles and responsibilities;
  • open entry and transparency of selection criteria;
  • evidence instead of declaration;
  • cooperation instead of departmental and corporate isolation;
  • priority of use to the person, territory and environment;
  • scaling only after checking the result;
  • feedback and continuous improvement of the system.

2. Problem solved by SFERA

Today, many significant initiatives do not reach the implementation stage: ideas are not formalized, competencies are divided, sources of resources are not related to projects, and the results are difficult to verify and repeat.

System gapManifestationReply SFERA
Initiative without a routeThe author does not understand where to turn and what data is neededSingle passport initiative and navigation
The examination is fragmentaryTechnology, law, economics and impact are evaluated separatelyInterdisciplinary expertise and common criteria
Participants are dividedNo owners of roles, risks and resultsCooperative assembly and RACI
Resources not relatedFinance, technology, personnel and sites exist separatelyResource passport and security package
Results not provenStatements replace measurementsBaseline, KPI, MRV and independent verification
Pilots are not replicatedThe experience remains single and unpackagedTypical solution and scaling network

3. Conveyor Initiatives SFERA

Each initiative goes through seven stages. The transition to the next stage occurs after fixing the result of the previous one - this protects the system from unreasonable promises and premature scaling.

1INITIATIVENeed, idea, author, territory Exit: Passport Initiatives
2EXPERTISEValue, feasibility, risks, compliance with the goals
3COOPERATIONRoles, competencies, partners, responsibility Exit: Agreement and matrix RACI
4RESOURCE ENSUREFinance, technology, data, personnel, platform Exit: Resource passport
5PILOTObject, plan, baseline, KPI, terms and owners of risk Exit: Proven solution at the facility
6CONFIRMED RESULTMeasurement, MRV, audit trail, independent verification Output: Proven case
7MASSTABINGTypization, investment model, training, replication Exit: Proof of Scale and the new cycle

4. Architecture SFERA

The platform is built as a set of interconnected contours. Their task is to ensure the full life cycle of the initiative without concentrating all the powers in one organization.

SFERA.INITIATIVES — reception, certification, routing and status of initiatives;

SFERA.EXPERTISE - scientific and technical, social, environmental, legal and economic assessment;

SFERA.COOPERATION — search for partners, competencies, suppliers and formation of project teams;

SFERA.RESOURCES — a combination of projects with finance, technology, personnel, data and sites;

SFERA.PILOTS — register of pilot objects, control of stages, terms, KPI and risks;

SFERA. PROOF — passport indicators, MRV, independent verification and a register of confirmed results;

SFERA.Knowledge - library of practices, training, methods and training of participants;

SFERA. EVENTS — forums, strategic sessions, exhibitions, public dialogue;

SFERA.MASSTAB — standard solutions, franchises, project portfolios and international cooperation;

SFERA.BACK COMMUNICATION - public control, treatment, quality assessment and program adjustment.

Thematic areas

  • Man and quality of life
  • Territories and cities
  • Science and education
  • Industry and technology
  • Energy and environment
  • Health and rehabilitation
  • Culture, Media and Events
  • Social economy and employment
  • International cooperation

5. Roles in the common system

SFERA is a connecting public and communication circuit. It works in conjunction with other elements of the architecture, but does not mix their functions.

ElementMain FunctionCommunication with SFERA
EQUILIBRIUMimage of the future, balance of interests, semantic and analytical architectureSets principles and criteria for consistency
ECO‑PPAEnergy and environmental model of project implementationprovides pilots, result methodology and proven cases
SPECZASHCHITAProduction and cooperation assembly of performerstransition from project to physical implementation
Project Officeproject passport, stage-gates, deadlines, risks, contracts and reportingleads the initiative after admission to the project outline
ESG‑IR 1.0Projected methodology of indicators, MRV and evidentiary statusesCreates a single language of measurable effect
SFERAinitiatives, communities, knowledge, communication and scalingSingle participation window and dissemination of confirmed practices

6. Participants and value to them

Citizens and communities

clear entry for initiatives; feedback; participation in discussion and control; access to knowledge and cooperation.

State and regions

Structured flow of initiatives; data on needs; trained pilots; measurable societal impact.

Business and industry

search for solutions and partners; access to pilots; reduction of transaction costs; replication of proven technologies.

Science and education

Research tasks; testing sites; growth TRL; commercialization of developments; training.

Financial institutions

standardized project data; transparent stages; risk allocation; evidence base for solutions.

NGOs, media and community leaders

proven materials; participation in public dialogue; training; dissemination of practices without replacing facts with promises.

Unit of account

The main unit of the platform is the passport of the initiative with a unique identifier, history of changes, owner, status, evidence and connections with participants, objects, resources and results.

7. Management, data and trust

Levels of management

  • Supervisory or strategic advice - objectives, principles and public legitimacy;
  • Expert councils - independent assessment in areas;
  • Project Committee - decisions on transitions, resources, risks and changes;
  • Project office — execution, registers, data room, deadlines and reporting;
  • Independent verifier - checking the indicators and the final result;
  • Public contour - feedback, availability of information and quality control.

Digital principles

  • unified Project ID and traceability of solutions;
  • Separation of public, official and confidential data;
  • legal grounds for processing personal and commercial data;
  • versioning of methods, documents and indicators;
  • audit trail: source → fixation → calculation → KPI → conclusion;
  • open publication of only confirmed results.

Basic KPI Platforms

  • The proportion of initiatives that have undergone initial examination;
  • period from registration to the decision on the route;
  • Percentage of initiatives with designated role owners;
  • number of pilots launched and completed;
  • the proportion of KPI, confirmed by independent verification;
  • the number of re-implementations of proven solutions;
  • Public satisfaction and quality of feedback.

8. Launch model

Launching SFERA is advisable to start not with building a huge universal system, but with a limited outline, one set of criteria and several initiatives that can be carried out in a full cycle.

Stage 1. The mandate and rules are to approve the mission, pilot area, roles, entry criteria, decision regulations and data protection;

Stage 2. The minimum platform is to create an initiative passport, a status register, an expert route, a competence catalog and a project office cabinet;

Stage 3. Pilot portfolio — select 3–5 initiatives, form a baseline, KPI, teams, resource passports and implementation plans;

Stage 4. Proof - to obtain operational data, conduct an independent check and issue proven cases;

Stage 5. Scale — to type solutions, prepare financial and organizational models, train regional teams and launch re-introductions.

Result of the first cycle

  • working route of the initiative from the entrance to the solution;
  • a consistent set of roles, documents and control points;
  • several completed pilots with measurable indicators;
  • Register of confirmed practices;
  • basis for scaling SFERA by territories and directions.

Other published edition: SFERA SPHERE_single_space_initiatives.pptx · Web Text +

A Common Space of Initiatives for a Common Future

From a social idea to a proven and scalable result

Base Concept • 2026

A useful initiative should get a route

STRATEGIC THESIS

SFERA unites citizens, communities, science, business and the state around a practical result - without substituting powers and responsibilities.

GENERAL

PURPOSE

A single space is not a single organization. It is a coherent environment of rules, data, roles and transitions.

Miscellaneous participants

One Architecture

Measurable result

Today, initiatives are lost between idea and implementation

WHY SFERA IS NEEDED

No clear route

single passport and navigation

The examination is divided

Common criteria and interdisciplinary assessment

Resources are separate

cooperative and resource assembly

The result is difficult to prove

baseline, KPI, MRV and verification

Pilots are not a system.

standard solution and scaling network

Seven steps turn an idea into a proven case

OPERATIONAL MODEL

Initiative

Expertise

Cooperation

Resources

Pilot

Result

Scale

Passport

Conclusion

RACI

security

Data

Verification

Propagation

The next stage opens only after confirmation of the previous result.

The system weeds out unfounded promises before scaling

TRANSITION CONTROL

REVISE

HOLD

STOP

continue

Refine

Suspend

Close and record the reasons

Each transition captures

It creates trust

Checked Stage Exit

Traceability of data

Decision and Risk Owner

reason for investment and replication

Ten contours provide a full life cycle

ARCHITECTURE OF THE PLATFORM

EXPERTISE

COOPERATION

INITIATIVES

RESOURCES

SFERA

PILOTS

PROOF

Single Route

Initiatives

FEEDBACK

KNOWLEDGE

EVENTS

MASSHTAB

SFERA connects the system without replacing its participants

DIVISION OF FUNCTIONS

EQUILIBRIUM

image of the future • balance • analytics

ECO‑PPA

Project Model of Energy and Ecology

SPECZASHCHITA

production and cooperation assembly

PROJECT OFFICE

stages • terms • risks • contracts

ESG‑IR 1.0

Indicators • MRV •

SFERA

Initiative • Community • Knowledge • Scale

All together ≠ Everybody does everything. Everyone contributes and is responsible for the commitments made.

Everyone gets a concrete result of participation

VALUE TO PARTICIPANTS

Citizens and communities

State and regions

clear input • feedback • participation

Trained Pilots • Measurable Effect

Business and industry

Science and education

partners • technology • replication

Tasks • Tests • Height TRL • Frames

Financial institutions

NPO, Media, Leaders

Standardized Data • Risk Control

Verified cases • training • trust

Single passport initiative creates traceability

DIGITAL NUCLEAR

history of decisions

Participants and Roles

PROJECT ID

INITIATIVE

№ 001

resources and treaties

data and evidence

Owner • territory • status

goals • indicators • documents

Risks and changes

Result and scale

Source → fixation → calculation → KPI → independent conclusion

A beautiful report does not replace a verifiable result

TRUST AND PROOF

BASELINE

MEASUREMENT

MRV

AUDIT TRAIL

VERIFICATION

PUBLICATION

Trust is created

The result becomes an asset.

Traceability of data

Basis for funding

Independent verification

grounds for re-introduction

SFERA begins with a limited but complete cycle

START MODEL

Mandate and rules

Objectives • Criteria • Role • Data

Minimum platform

passport • register • route • catalog

Pilot's Portfolio

3–5 initiatives • KPI • teams • resources

Evidence

operation • verification • cases

Scale

Models • Training • Re-implementation

The first cycle should prove not the scale of the platform, but the operability of the route from the initiative to the confirmed result.

SFERA unites for the sake of the overall result

Outcome

SFERA

The initiative gets a route.

Participants have clear roles.

The result is proof.

The future is the possibility of scaling.

Single target • Joint action • Confirmed result

Published files

Platform · Full published text

The Technological Face of Russia

Source Status: Primary Document

Strategic Concept for the Polytechnic Museum

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/tekhnologicheskoe-litso-rossii-politeh

Open on the site

From National Technological Memory to the Public Interface of the Future

Main thesis

The museum should show not the collection of equipment, but the ability of the country to create the future.

Memory

Action

Selection

POLYTECH =

The past explains how competences came about. The present shows what really works. The future poses the question: What do we choose to create next?

Not a “window of achievement,” but a national cultural narrative of science, engineering, and responsibility.

Why it matters now

Technological identity is formed not only by factories and research institutes, but also by how society understands technology.

Generation gap

Complexity of technologies

The great engineering achievements of the past are often not connected in the minds of young people with modern professions and laboratories.

AI, atom, biotech, quantum systems, and new materials require a public language of explanation — without simplification to the slogan.

The competition of the future images

Need a Trust Area

World scientific museums already operate as institutes for the formation of scientific culture and participation in STEM.

The museum is able to discuss the successes, limitations, risks and ethics of technology in a more neutral format than a corporate exhibition.

Science Museum Group - mission "Inspire Futures", hands-on learning and science capital.

What is the technological face of the country

Not a list of industries, but an interconnected system of competencies.

LIFE

MATERIALS

ENERGY

INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY

CULTURE

MOVEMENT

HUMANITY

WEDNESDAY

PRODUCTION

Architecture of narrative

Each technology must be revealed through the same logic, from task to consequence.

THE PROBLEM

PRINCIPLE

Engineering

PRODUCTION

INFLUENCE

HORIZON

What required a decision?

What knowledge is the basis?

How did the decision come about?

How did it become a system?

What's changed?

What's next?

So the museum turns from a catalog of objects into an understanding system.

History as a chain of breakthroughs

Chronology is necessary, but should not be the main scenario.

FUNDAMENT

Natural science • mechanics • electricity • communication

INDUSTRIAL FISHING

power engineering • transport • mechanical engineering • infrastructure

GREAT SCIENCE

atom • space • calculations • new materials

COMPLEX SYSTEMS

automation • instrumentation • digital contours

A NEW ERA

AI • Biotech • Robotics • New energy solutions

Visitor's Path

The goal is to guide the person from surprise to participation.

SEE

UNDERSTAND

TESTS

COMPARE

CREATE

INCLUDED

scale and effect of presence

A simple explanation of the principle

experiment, simulator, digital twin

world solutions and compromises

design task and prototype

education, profession, project

The key KPI is not just attendance, but the growing sense of "science and technology is a space in which there is room for me."

The Science Museum Group uses the science capital approach to assess and develop people’s attitudes towards STEM.

Possible structure of the permanent exhibition

Energy of Civilization

Matter and new properties

Machine and production

Communication, computing and AI

Movement: Earth, Air, Space

Life: Medicine and Biotechnology

City and Wednesday

Man and technology

The end-to-end axis: “from the instrument to the complex system to the human creator.”

Gallery of the Future

The most rapidly updated museum circuit.

NEW ENERGY

AUTONOMOUS INDUSTRY

PERSONALIZED MEDICINE

QUANTUM SYSTEMS

SPACE ECONOMY

CLIMATE ADAPTATION

AI AS INFRASTRUCTURE

CLOSED RESOURCE CYCLES

NEW CITIES AND TRANSPORT

Each module: level of readiness • Russian Competences • World Frame • Prototype • Risks • scenarios 2035/2050

Polytech as a new type of institution

MUSEUM

LABORATORY

VITRINA

preserves and interprets

allows to experiment

Shows real developments

NAVIGATOR

FORUM

FUTURE ARCHIVE

leads to professions and education

Creates a conversation about the future

captures the ideas and prototypes of today

National cooperation

The museum should not alone produce content about modern technology.

RAS • Research Centers • Laboratory

Technical Universities • Schools • Colleges

SCIENCE

EDUCATION

State Corporation • enterprises • technology companies

museums • industrial cities • technoparks

INDUSTRY

REGIONS

student KB • startups • project teams

Documentary • design • New Media

YOUNG ENGINEERS

MEDIA AND CULTURE

The principle: the partner gives access to real technology, the museum retains editorial and scientific independence.

What the world's analogues show

Strong science museums connect collection, experiment, education and current issues.

Science Museum, London

Deutsches Museum

Miraikan, Tokyo

Inspire Futures idea; real objects + hands-on; science capital and availability STEM.

The history of science and technology through demonstrations, experiments and a large-scale research base.

Focus on emerging science, interaction of scientists and society, scenarios of the future.

Conclusion for Russia: own narrative - engineering culture of complex systems, the scale of the country, fundamental school and experience of large technological projects.

Source: Science Museum Group Deutsches Museum; official museum materials.

Don’t let the project become official.

The technological face of a country is only convincing when it admits of complexity.

Evidence

Comparability

each thesis is tied to an object, data, source, research, or working prototype

Russian technology is shown in a global context, without isolation

Critical Thinking

Editorial independence

along with success - limitations, the price of the solution, unsuccessful hypotheses and risk

Corporate partner does not define museum interpretation

Live Update

The Man in the Center

The future and modern technology are reviewed annually

It is not technology that matters for the sake of technology, but changing opportunities and quality of life.

Digital Polytech

Not a copy of the exhibition on the Internet, but the second contour of the museum.

DIGITAL DOUBLE

TECHNOLOGICAL MAP

AI-GUIDE

3D-objects, models, schemes and history of modifications

Contacts: openings → people → schools → industries → enterprises → modern solutions

Adaptive routes by age, interests and level of training

RESEARCH PASSPORT

OPEN COLLECTION

NATIONAL NETWORK

personal trajectory: what I saw, what I learned, what to try next

Access to digitized funds and research materials

Digital exhibitions and programs with regional museums

How to measure the result

We need indicators not only of traffic, but also changes in attitude to science and engineering.

OHWAT

RETURN

UNDERSTANDING

INVOLVEMENT

visits • digital audience • regions

repeated visits • participation in programs

Increase in technological literacy before/after the visit

Percentage of visitors who completed an experiment or project

TRAEKTORIA

PARTNERSHIP

UPDATE

TRUST

transition to educational programs, competitions, internships

number of active scientific and industrial modules

Future exposure share, updated annually

Assessment of scientific credibility and neutrality

Road map 5–10 years

0–12 months

1–3 years

3–5 years

5–10 years

CONCEPT

STARTING

MASSHTAB

INSTITUTE

editorial platform • content map • scientific council • pilot modules

Permanent halls • digital circuit • laboratory • national partner network

Regional programmes • Annual Forum • travelling exhibitions • Open Collection

an internationally comparable center of technological culture and public conversation about the future

The technological face of Russia

CONCEPTUAL PLATFORM

Russia is not a set of technologies.

It is a culture of turning knowledge into working systems.

To make scientific and technological development understandable, personal and culturally significant for everyone.

MISSION

Polytech is the main public interface of Russia’s technological future.

POSITIONING

Polytech. Technology is becoming a culture.

POSSIBLE FORMS

Russia is creating. Polytech explains.

From engineering memory to the engineering future.

The technological face of Russia: see • understand • create.

Polytech. A place where the future becomes the subject of conversation and action.

The basic recommendation: "The technological face of Russia" is used as a strategic program and umbrella narrative, and not as an advertising slogan of the entire museum.

Published files

Platform · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM Industrial Technology System

Source Status: Primary Document

The unified architecture of science, materials science, industry, infrastructure, social finance and banks

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/ekvilibrium-industrialnyi-kontur

Open on the site

Key principle: scientific result should go the full way → material → Technology → Production → infrastructure applications → Confirmed effect → financing → Scaling".

1. Designation of industrial contour

The industrial circuit EQUILIBRIUM is a system for transferring scientific developments and new materials to mass production, infrastructure solutions and sustainable financial assets. It brings together laboratories, developers, pilot industries, factories, engineering companies, infrastructure operators, development institutions, banks and social financial mechanisms.

The outline should bridge the gap between science and industry: development is not seen as an isolated invention, but as an element of a single technological chain with clear indicators of readiness, cost, scaling, environmental safety and social impact.

2. Outline Architecture

Research layer. fundamental and applied science; materials chemistry; matter physics; nanostructures; process modeling; laboratory research; digital materials science and AI.

Material core. ultrapure aluminum oxide; nanostructured oxides; metal-organic frame structures (MOF/MOKS); functional ceramics; composite and geotechnical materials.

The technological core. SVS/SHS-synthesis; particle fractionation; selective filtration; formation of ceramic matrices; soil stabilization; processing of waste into raw materials.

Industrial layer. pilot lines; pilot plants; serial production; standardization; metrology; quality control; intellectual property protection; licensing.

Infrastructure layer. desalination and water treatment; water channels; roads; airfield coatings; marine structures; prefabricated structures; desert and Arctic infrastructure.

Environmental layer. Zero-Brine / minimization of brine; processing of phosphogypsum, red sludge, ash, aluminum slags; closed cycles; reduction of material and energy intensity.

Financial and banking layer. project financing; infrastructure loans; equipment leasing; guarantees; bonds; CFA and other legal instruments; social finance; blended finance; mechanisms of payment for the result.

Control circuit EQUILIBRIUM. digital register of technologies and assets; TRL; material passports; pilot data; monitoring KPI; effect verification; resource routing; scaling management.

3. Basic technological stack

Technology / MaterialFunctionIndustrial applicationsRole in EQUILIBRIUM
Ultrapure alumina productsBasic high purity material and precursorsceramics, filters, catalysis, electronics, special materialsMaterial Science Production Base
MOX / MOFcontrolled porosity and selective separationfiltration, sorption, water treatmentFunctional Materials Platform
AQUAMOXdesalination and separation of water/saltsModernization of existing and creation of new water treatment systemsWater Technology Outline
SVS / SHS-ceramicsself-propagating high-temperature synthesisbuilding elements, filters, refractories, marine and road constructionslow-energy production of functional ceramics
Soil stabilizationsealing, erosion and dust control, base improvementroads, foundations, desert areas, infrastructure sitesGeomaterials
Waste-to-MaterialsInvolvement of industrial waste in the materialconstruction ceramics and infrastructure productsCircular Industry

4. The full cycle industrial chain

  1. 1. A scientific hypothesis and a laboratory sample.
  2. 2. Confirmation of composition, structure and physicochemical characteristics.
  3. 3. Material passport and map of target properties.
  4. 4. Development and prototype.
  5. 5. Independent testing and verification of the declared characteristics.
  6. 6. Pilot line and cost calculation.
  7. 7. Certification and industry approval.
  8. 8. The first industrial facility.
  9. 9. Banking and project financing scaling.
  10. 10. Serial production and international licensing.
  11. 11. Digital monitoring of the result in EQUILIBRIUM.
  12. 12. Re-inclusion of materials and waste in the next production cycle.

5. Materials Science as a Central Integrator

The central position in the contour is material science. The same set of competencies — managing chemical composition, purity, particle size, phase state, porosity, surface, and synthesis mechanism — can form a whole family of end products.

Therefore, it is advisable to consider the plant of ultra-pure aluminum oxide products not as a separate plant, but as the initial node of the materials platform: filtration, ceramic, catalytic, thermal insulation and other functional solutions are formed from it.

6. Water and desert industrial cluster

The most capacious integration scenario is the creation of a territorial cluster for dry regions. It combines sea water, AQUAMOX, salt extraction and processing, SBC ceramics, local sand, soil stabilization, construction of water and transport infrastructure, and then agricultural technologies and restoration of territories.

Sea → Desalination → Fresh water → concentrated salts → Reprocessing → IFOR materials → canals/roads/bases → sand stabilization → Water retention → New economic territory.

7. Social Finance and Banks

The financial layer EQUILIBRIUM should be associated with a measurable physical result. The banking system here does not replace technological expertise, but provides a transition from a confirmed pilot to an industrial scale.

Scientific funding: grants, R&D contracts, venture financing deep-tech.

Project financing: financing of a plant or infrastructure facility under the project cash flow.

Leasing: equipment of pilot and industrial lines.

Guarantees and insurance: distribution of technological and construction risks.

Social finance: capital for projects with measurable environmental and societal impact.

Blended finance: the combination of state, banking, private and institutional capital.

Payment for the result: part of the funding is tied to the confirmed indicators of water, waste, energy and infrastructure.

8. What should be measured

  • TRL and the readiness of the technology for industrial use;
  • purity, phase composition, microstructure and material stability;
  • Product performance and resource;
  • energy consumption per unit of production;
  • CAPEX and OPEX industrial line;
  • cost of cubic meter of purified / desalinated water;
  • the share of re-involved raw materials and waste;
  • carbon and environmental load;
  • service life of infrastructure;
  • Confirmed socio-economic impact.

9. Verification outline

Statements about the absence of analogues, multiple performance improvements, extreme durability, low energy intensity and other benefits should move from the presentation level to the evidence system. For each product, test reports, a comparison method with analogues, an independent laboratory, a pilot facility and an economic model are required.

10. Organizational model

The scientific council approves research directions and criteria of evidence.

Materials Science Center. conducts material passports, samples, tests and recipe database.

Engineering center. translates the material into equipment, lines and objects.

Pilot site. conducts pilot-industrial operation.

Industrial consortium. serial production and supply.

The Finance Committee structures financing, guarantees and investment mechanisms.

EQUILIBRIUM HUB. Maintains a Digital Registry, KPI, Cooperation and Scaling.

11. Priority industrial programs

  1. High-purity aluminum oxide materials.
  2. AQUAMOX: A new generation of filtration materials.
  3. SVS ceramics for construction and infrastructure.
  4. Recycling of industrial waste into functional materials.
  5. Soil stabilization and desert infrastructure.
  6. Materials for marine and Arctic exploitation.
  7. Refractory, heat-insulating and chemically resistant materials.
  8. Ceramic filters and catalytic carriers.
  9. Digital materials science and AI-design of compositions.
  10. Financial platform for scaling technological productions.

12. Final formula

EQUILIBRIUM = SCIENCE × MATERIALS × TECHNOLOGY × PRODUCTION × INFRASTRUCTURE × SOCIAL FINANCES × BANKS × VERIFICATION × MASSTABING

Note on evidence

The document forms the target architecture. The specific specifications stated in the source materials (including performance multiples, resource, temperature and chemical resistance, energy advantages and lack of analogues) should be confirmed by independent tests before use in investment, banking or government documentation as established facts.

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM Industrial contour of technologies Unified architecture of science, materials science, industry, infrastructure, social finance and banks EQUILIBRIUM_Industrial_circuit_technology.pptx · Web Text +

Key principle of research → material → Technology → Production → Infrastructure → Confirmed effect → financing → Scaling

EQUILIBRIUM • 01

Why do we need a single industry?

The main task is to bridge the gap between scientific development and serial implementation.

Science

Discoveries, laboratory samples, new materials and technological effects.

Industry

Piloting, certification, plants, supply chains, operation.

Finance

Project finance, banks, social finance, scaling.

EQUILIBRIUM binds everything into one controlled cycle

The technology is evaluated simultaneously on scientific evidence, industrial readiness, economics, environmental impact and ability to scale.

EQUILIBRIUM • 02

Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

Eight interconnected layers

Science

Materials Science

Technology

Industry

Infrastructure

Ecology

Finance and banks

Digital management

EQUILIBRIUM • 03

Material Science Core

Material is not a product, but a platform of functions

Superpure Al₂O₃

Base for ceramics, filtration, catalytic and special materials.

MOX / MOF

Controlled porosity, selectivity, developed surface.

SVS / SHS

Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of functional ceramics.

Geomaterials

Stabilization of soils, sands, bases and erosion zones.

Unified Logic

We control the composition, purity, particle size, phases, porosity, surface and synthesis mode - we get a family of materials for water, construction, energy and ecology.

EQUILIBRIUM • 04

Basic technological stack

Alumina platform

High-purity precursors and nanostructured oxides

AQUAMOX

New generation of desalination filtration materials

SVS-ceramic

construction, filtration, refractory and marine solutions

Waste-to-Materials

Involvement of industrial waste in a new material matrix

Soil stabilization

strengthening, dust suppression, erosion control, water retention

AI-material science

composition search, property forecast, digital material passports

EQUILIBRIUM • 05

The full cycle industrial chain

01

The Scientific Hypothesis

02

Material Passport

03

Prototype

04

Independent testing

05

Pilot Line

06

Certification

07

The first object

08

Bank financing

09

Serial production

10

International Scaling

EQUILIBRIUM • 06

Water-desert industrial cluster

Integration scenario for dry regions

Sea water

AQUAMOX

Fresh water

Salts / Rapa

IFOR materials

Canals and roads

Stabilization of sands

Water retention

New economic territory

Strategic effect

Local raw materials + water + Infrastructure + Circular Processing + Territory development

EQUILIBRIUM • 07

Industrial applications

Desalination and water treatment

AQUAMOX, ceramic filters

Construction

SBC units, monoliths, 3D-sintering

Channels and marine facilities

water-resistant and chemically resistant ceramics

Roads and airfields

coatings and bases without classic binders

The Arctic and Deserts

materials for extreme temperatures

Ecology

recycling of ash, sludge, phosphogypsum and other waste

EQUILIBRIUM • 08

Social Finance and Banks

The financial system is connected after proving the technological result

R&D and grants

Laboratories, development, prototyping, testing.

Project financing

Pilot and serial production lines, infrastructure facilities.

Social finance

Projects with measurable social and environmental impact.

Leasing and Guarantees

Equipment, distribution of technological and construction risks.

Blended Finance

Combination of state, banking, private and institutional capital.

Payment for the result

Linking part of financing to water, energy, waste and infrastructure KPI.

EQUILIBRIUM • 09

Evidence and verification

Strong statements must be translated into measurable and reproducible indicators

Technological KPI

Economic and systems KPI

• TRL and industrial readiness

• Composition, structure, purity and stability

• Productivity and Resource

• Energy costs

• CAPEX / OPEX

• Unit cost of product / m³ Water

• Environmental load

• Share of secondary raw materials

• Infrastructure lifetime

• Socio-economic effect

EQUILIBRIUM • 10

Organizational model of the industrial contour

Scientific Council

Priorities and criteria of evidence

Center of Materials Science

samples, recipes, passports, tests

Engineering Center

prototypes, lines, objects

Pilot range

pilot-industrial operation

Industrial Consortium

mass production and supply

Finance Committee

banks, guarantees, investments

EQUILIBRIUM HUB

digital registry, KPI, cooperation, scaling

EQUILIBRIUM • 11

Priority programs EQUILIBRIUM

Ultrapure alumina materials

AQUAMOX and filtration materials

SVS ceramics for infrastructure

Recycling of waste into materials

Soil stabilization and desert infrastructure

Materials for the sea and the Arctic

Refractory and thermal insulation materials

Ceramic filters and catalysts

AI-material design

Financial Scaling Platform

EQUILIBRIUM • 12

Final formula

EQUILIBRIUM

SCIENCE × MATERIALS × TECHNOLOGY × PRODUCTION × INFRASTRUCTURE × SOCIAL FINANCES × BANKS × VERIFICATION × MASSTABING

Result

Not a set of individual innovations, but a managed system of transition from knowledge to industrial and social effect.

EQUILIBRIUM • 13

Basis of presentation

Project materials and downloaded documents

• "AQUAMOX Project" - the concept of filtration materials for desalination and salt processing.

• "SWS technology of creation of waterproof monolith ..." — SWS-ceramics, construction, filtration, waste, extreme environments.

• "AQUAMOX 03.2026" — positioning of technology, integration into existing RO-systems, Zero-Brine approach.

• "Plant for the production of aluminum oxide products" - the production base of ultrapure materials.

• "The Doctrine of Development of the Russian Federation" is a systemic context of science, industry, water, ecology, finance and infrastructure.

• Important: The claimed technical advantages must be confirmed by independent tests before being presented as established facts.

EQUILIBRIUM • 14

Published files

Platform · Full published text

R&D Model

Source Status: Primary Document

Research and project system of transformation of knowledge, ideas, cultural codes and technologies into events, products, registers, educational programs and new markets

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/rd-model-gorod-sobytiy

Open on the site

Research

Development

Deployment

Demonstration

Version 1.0 · 22 August 2026

1. Summary of the model

APPOINTMENT

R&D-SFERA is not a development department, but a factory for turning designs into proven assets.

Main objective

Event as a test

Knowledge as an Asset

Shorten the path from idea to result and make development manageable: from research to scaling.

Each event becomes a public test of the hypothesis, a partner assembly point, and a digital footprint generator.

Methods, scenarios, data, registers, presentations, cases and educational modules are fixed in the knowledge base.

Idea

Prototype

Event

Market

The result of the model: a controlled conveyor of cultural, educational, digital and event products.

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

2. Main logic R&D-SFERA

FORMULA

Research

Development

Deployment

Demonstration

Research environment, trends, requests

Designing concepts and prototypes

Getting to the city through teams and platforms

public verification through event and media

Expanded ecosystem chain SFERA

Research

Concept

Prototype

Event

Register

Product

Scaling

Capitalization

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

3. Research and development facilities

WHAT WE DEVELOP

Events

Urban formats

Culture and cinema

forums, festivals, awards, exhibitions, strategic games

routes, spaces, centers of attraction, clusters

registers, festivals, film clubs, script laboratories

Education

Digital Products

Economy

courses, intensives, schools, academies, methods

portals, maps, offices, AI-navigation, archives

grants, sponsorship, franchises, PPPs, club models

Principle: The object of R&D is everything that can be researched, designed, tested, packaged and scaled.

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

4. Architecture of R&D models

CONTOURS

Research Outline

environment scanning, interviews, analog analysis, resource maps

Conceptual outline

meaning, positioning, audience, format, effect

Project domain

project passport, budget, team, calendar, risks

Prototype outline

MVP, test event, demo page, pilot session

Event Outline

public approbation, partners, media, feedback

Digital framework

registers, knowledge base, data, analytics, scaling

A single project office connects all the contours into one controlled conveyor

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

5. Full R&D cycle

CONVEIER

The cycle works like a repeatable machine: each new iteration refines the product, strengthens the partner network and increases the project capitalization.

Rule

First a small prototype, then scaling.

Scanning

Capitalization

Research

Withdrawal

R&D cycle

Ready case, digital footprint and clear next step.

Scaling

Concept

Asset

Register

Design

Methodology, brand, registry, franchise or affiliate program.

Packaging

Prototype

Event

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

6. Events City R&D Laboratory

FUNCTIONS

Laboratory of Events

Culture and cinema

Laboratory of knowledge

format catalog, scripts, calendar

portal, registries, festivals, media archives

courses, academies, schools, digital library

Digital Registers

Branding and Media

Economics and grants

asset map, offices, analytics, AI-navigator

styles, sites, teasers, social networks, PR campaigns

partner packages, applications, franchises, PPP

Laboratories are not isolated: they are assembled for a specific project as a temporary production team.

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

7. Five portals of R&D-model

FIVE WAYS

Portal logic helps not only to name blocks beautifully, but also to dilute functions: meaning, place, connection, knowledge and the digital layer.

Fire

Ideas and Creation

manifestos, concepts, future design

Ether

Land

SFERA Assembly

Digital SFERA

Infrastructure

registers, AI, offices, certificates

sites, routes, clusters, museums

Air

Water

Knowledge and Media

Communications

Media, lectures, films, libraries

communities, partners, volunteers, connections

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

8. Management model

HOW TO MANAGE

R&D Council

Project cells

Project Office

• Selection of projects

• Hypothesis statement

• appointment of curators

• Effects Control

• scaling solution

Initiator → Researcher → producer → designer → Methodologist → financier → Media → Partners.

Each cell is responsible for a specific project and its result.

• calendar of events

• passport projects

• registers and knowledge base

• grant applications

• partner packages

• reporting and KPI

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

9. Registers, data and knowledge base

DIGITAL LAYER

Each project leaves a manageable digital footprint — from the idea to the scaling case.

the Event Registry

the Register of Cultural Projects

Cinema Registry

the Register of Sites

roster of experts

Partner Registry

the Grant Registry

Franchise Registry

the Register of Educational Programs

Sign in

Processing

Withdrawal

idea, request, partner, resource

passport, data, examination, prototype

case, product, franchise

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

10. Economics and grant outline

RESOURCES

Grants

Partnerships

Revenues

Scaling

competitions, applications, project passports, reports

sponsorship packages, corporate programs, expert clubs

tickets, subscriptions, services, licenses, merchandise, training

franchises, regional series, international formats

Financial logic: each event should not be an expense, but a step in the creation of an asset.

Event

Media case

Product

Market

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

11. KPI and result evaluation

MEASUREMENT

R&D portfolio

Event result

Partner Network

concepts, prototypes, project passports

events, participants, venues, regularity

partners, experts, institutions, sponsors

Finance

Media

Social impact

grants, revenue, budgetary and extrabudgetary resources

publications, coverage, video, reputation index

education, employment, citizen engagement, tourism

Important: KPI should measure not only money, but also the development of the environment - knowledge, connections, trust, reputation and new opportunities of the city.

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

12. Road map of implementation

STARTING

0–30 days

31–90 days

3–6 months

6–12 months

Kernel assembly

Pilots

Conveyor

Scale

team, registers, passport templates, map of the first projects

3–5 prototype events, first knowledge base, partner packages

regular calendar, grant flow, media packaging cases

franchises, regional series, international partners, digital SFERA

A critical success factor is to quickly launch the first portfolio of pilots and record the results in the form of cases.

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

13. Standard passport of the project

SHABLON

Name

Budget

Mission

Partners

Goal

Indicators

Target audience

Risks

Product

Launch plan

Deadlines

Scaling model

Team

Digital footprint

The project passport is a single management standard: without it, the idea does not get into the R&D pipeline.

R&D Model of Events City · City of Knowledge · SFERA

The City of Events is not a calendar of events.

TOTAL POSITIONING

It is a research and design machine that transforms the city into a living laboratory of the future.

For the city

For people

For partners

new economy, tourism, reputation, employment

education, participation, creation, opportunities

projects, data, cases, markets

R&D model · City Events · City Knowledge · SFERA

Published files

Platform · Full published text

Culture of a New Order

Source Status: Primary Document

Doctrine of Creative Culture, Social Solidarity and Human Development

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/kultura-novogo-uklada

Open on the site

Strategic document • Moscow • 2026

Annotation

“Culture of a New Order” is a concept for the transition from a culture of consumption, fragmentation and short-term gain to a culture of dignity, belonging, creation and responsibility for the future. It describes a shared civilisational framework, rather than a single mandatory way of life, within which peoples, generations, territories, professional communities and creative communities develop freely.

The document combines a value doctrine and a practical program: defines the image of the person and society, cultural rights and duties, institutional architecture, mechanisms of public participation, the economy of culture, the digital environment, the system of indicators and the road map to 2040.

Status and purpose of the document

  • The basis for public discussion, strategic sessions and cultural development programs.
  • Framework for federal, regional, municipal and corporate initiatives.
  • Methodological module EQUILIBRIUM, associated with SFERA, ECO-PPA and social cooperation.
  • The designer of pilot projects, which requires legal, budgetary and expert adaptation to a specific territory.

Table of contents

1. Initial situation and challenge

2. The Vision of the New Order

3. Value Core

4. The Human Being of the New Order

5. 13 principles of cultural policy

6. 20 contours of culture

7. Institutional architecture

8. Culture in the Life Cycle

9. Economics and social cooperation

10. Digital Cultural Outline

11. Territories and Spaces

12. Media and Communication

13. Education and science

14. Intercultural dialogue

15. Management system

16. Outcome indicators

17. Road map 2026–2040

18. Portfolio of First Initiatives

19. Risks and guarantees

20. Manifesto of the Culture of a New Order

1. Initial situation and challenge

Modern society has unprecedented access to knowledge, technology and communication, but at the same time suffers from a lack of trust, meaning and long-term connections. Information abundance does not guarantee understanding; economic growth does not automatically create solidarity; digital connectivity can be accompanied by loneliness and polarization.

1.1. Seven Systemic Gaps

GapManifestationThe New Order's Response
SmyslovaLoss of the image of the common futureCommunity dialogue and culture of creation
Generationalweak transfer of experience and memoryMentoring and joint projects
TerritorialInequality of cultural opportunitiesdistributed infrastructure
DigitalAlgorithmic Bubbles and DependencyDigital maturity and social standards
EconomicUnderestimation of cultural workCooperative and project economics
EnvironmentalSeparation of man from natureCulture of biocenosis recovery
InstitutionalActions instead of long changesMission programs and measurable results

1.2. Subject of transformation

It’s not just cultural institutions that are changing. Everyday norms are changing: how people learn and work, make decisions, resolve conflicts, care for the weak, interact with nature, create and distribute social value.

2. The Vision of the New Order

2.1. Five transitions

FromK
Passive ConsumptionCo-creation and Participation
Competition without rulescompetition of ideas and cooperation in the common cause
the Short HorizonResponsibility to future generations
UnificationUnity while maintaining differences
Events as ReportSustainable change in quality of life

2.2. Targeted social impact

  • A person feels dignity, belonging and the ability to influence the environment.
  • The community is able to negotiate, create common and take care of the heritage.
  • The state provides rights, infrastructure and fair rules, not replacing live initiative.
  • Business sees culture as a capital of trust, human development and sustainability.
  • Technology expands freedom and access to knowledge, while preserving human authorship and responsibility.

3. Value Core

ValueContentsPractical criterion
DignityUnconditional value of each personno humiliation, discrimination and exploitation
TruthRespect for facts, memory and honest dialogueVerification of claims and admission of errors
FreedomThe right to choose, create and express themselvesFreedom is combined with responsibility
FairnessProportionality of rights, contributions and supporttransparent rules and access to opportunities
SolidarityWillingness to act for the common goodMutual assistance becomes the norm
Creationtransforming the world without destroying the foundations of lifeThe result increases social value
Measurebalance of personal and general, tradition and noveltyDecisions do not cause disproportionate harm
Beautyharmony of form, content and environmentAesthetic quality of everyday life
Memorycontinuity of generations and respect for heritageHeritage lives in new practices
Careattention to man, nature and the futureThe vulnerable are not excluded from development

3.1. Ethical formula of the solution

  1. Does the decision respect the dignity of the person?
  2. Does it build trust and cooperation?
  3. Does it create long-term social value?
  4. Does cultural and natural diversity exist?
  5. Can the consequences and responsibilities be explained openly?

4. The Human Being of the New Order

The purpose of culture is not to produce the “right person,” but to reveal the ability of a person to think, feel, create, cooperate and be responsible for the consequences of his or her decisions.

4.1. Nine Maturities

MatureManifestation
Smyslovaunderstands its values and links personal purpose with the common good
EthicalHe sees the consequences of the choice and keeps his word.
Emotionallyrecognizes feelings, shows empathy, knows how to recover
IntelligentDistinguish between fact, opinion and manipulation
CreativeCreates new forms and solutions
SocialAgree, cooperate and resolve conflicts
Digitalmanages attention, data and interaction with AI
EnvironmentalUnderstand the relationship between humans and biocenoses
Civilparticipates in the affairs of the territory and protects the public good

5. Thirteen Principles of Cultural Policy

1. Man is a goal

Any program is evaluated by human development, not by the number of events.

2. Unity in Diversity

Shared values do not eliminate linguistic, ethnic, religious and creative differences.

3. Freedom of creativity

Government support does not translate into management of artistic content.

4. Availability

Residence, age, health and income should not prevent access to culture.

5. Subjectivity of communities

Residents are involved in setting objectives and evaluating the outcome.

6. Continuity

Heritage is passed on through living practices, not just storage.

7. Dialogue of generations

Children, adults and seniors create joint projects.

8. Creative work

Workmanship and quality are recognized as cultural values.

9. Technological Humanity

Digital tools are subordinated to freedom, security and development.

10. Environmental ownership

Culture brings back to man the experience of connection with nature.

11. Partnerships with boundaries of responsibility

The state, society and business have clear roles and transparency.

12. Evidence

The result is measured by change, not just coverage.

13. The Long Horizon

The decisions take into account the interests of future generations.

6. Twenty contours of culture

№ContourMain objective
1Familytrust, care, family memory
2Educationholistic development and culture of thinking
3ScienceHonesty of knowledge and responsibility of discovery
4Workskill, dignity, cooperation
5EntrepreneurshipValue creation and responsible initiative
6ArtFreedom of image and language of the future
7Heritagepreservation, comprehension, updating
8LanguageRichness of speech and understanding
9MediaReliability, complexity and public dialogue
10The digital environmentHuman-centered algorithms and literacy
11Healthbody culture, prevention and mutual care
12Sportwill, fair play, teamwork
13NatureEnvironmental Participation and Recovery
14City and villagebeauty, accessibility, participation of residents
15RightFair procedures and legal culture
16ManagementService, Openness and Feedback
17SecurityProtecting the dignity and sustainability of communities
18Inter-ethnic dialoguerespect, translation of meanings, joint business
19International cooperationCultural Diplomacy and Knowledge Sharing
20Futureforesight, imagination and responsibility

7. Institutional architecture

7.1. Distributed system

LevelKey institutionsFunction
NationalNew Order Culture Council; Programme Fund; Analytical Centerstrategy, standards, financing, monitoring
Regionalcultural project offices; expert councils; resource centersadaptation, inter-municipal cooperation, team support
Municipalhouses of creation; libraries of a new type; public councilsaccess, participation of residents, local memory
Communityfamily clubs; workshops; artels; volunteer associationsLive practices and mutual assistance
Digitalplatform SFERA; cultural register; open showcase of projectsnavigation, cooperation, data and feedback

7.2. Role of the system EQUILIBRIUM

EQUILIBRIUM forms an analytical and value contour: observes changes in the cultural environment, identifies imbalances, models the consequences of decisions and connects initiatives with measurable social results. SFERA Become a space of initiatives and cooperation; ECO‑PPA — pooling of resources for programmes with demonstrated impact; SPECZASHCHITA — Co-operative Contour of Execution.

8. Culture in the human life cycle

StageThe cultural challengeBasic institutions
0–6attachment, language, play, sense of beautyfamily, kindergarten, library
7–14curiosity, friendship, craft, belongingschool, circle, museum, sport
15–22identity, choice of path, creativity, servicecollege, university, youth center
23–40profession, family, civic participationemployer, community, cultural center
41–60skills, mentoring, public leadershipprofessional associations, councils
60+transfer of experience, active longevity, memoryclubs, older universities, archives

9. Culture Economics and Social Cooperation

The culture of the New Order creates measurable social and economic value: trust, qualifications, attractiveness of territories, health, reduction of conflict, new products and employment. Funding should support not only institutions and events, but also sustainable communities of practice.

9.1. Financial model

  • Basic public funding of cultural rights and infrastructure.
  • Competitive programs for inter-sector missions and pilot projects.
  • Social order and contracts of social result.
  • Cooperative funds, mutual mechanisms and earmarked capitals.
  • Responsible patronage with full transparency of conditions.
  • Marketplace of Cultural and Social Initiatives at SFERA.

9.2. The Cultural Cooperative

The Cultural Cooperative brings together authors, masters, educators, residents, venues and investors around a common program. It ensures shared ownership of infrastructure, equitable income distribution, procurement and marketing, training, risk insurance and preservation of local value in the territory.

ResourceContributionReturn
Persontime, knowledge, creativityincome, recognition, development
Communitytrust, network, volunteeringEnvironment quality and new opportunities
Businessfinance, competence, infrastructurepersonnel, reputation, sustainability
Staterules, co-financing, facilitiessocial impact and risk reduction

10. Digital Cultural Outline

10.1. Appointment

  • Unified navigation on opportunities, spaces, communities and projects.
  • Digital passport of the cultural environment of the territory and accessibility map.
  • Register of initiatives, competencies, heritage and confirmed results.
  • Tools of joint design, crowdfunding and cooperation.
  • Open educational collections and safe creative tools AI.

10.2. Digital rights

  • the right to privacy and control of personal data
  • Right to know when content is created or modified AI
  • The right to a human decision in important matters
  • Right of author to attribution and fair remuneration
  • Children’s right to a safe digital environment
  • The right of the community to access data about its own territory

11. Territories and Spaces

The New Order manifests itself in the everyday environment. The street, courtyard, school, enterprise, library, park and digital space are seen as a single cultural ecosystem.

11.1. House of Creation

The basic municipal node, which unites the library, workshop, media laboratory, small stage, family club, project office and intergenerational communication space. Its program is formed together with the residents, and the result is assessed by the emergence of sustainable initiatives and connections.

11.2. Cultural passport of the territory

LayerWhat is fixed
Heritageobjects, stories, archives, languages, crafts
Peoplecompetence carriers, authors, mentors, teams
Infrastructuresites, availability, status, loading
Practicesevents, clubs, rituals of civil unity
NeedsBarriers, Deficits, Exclusion Groups
Capacityideas, partners, resources, growth points

12. Media and public communication

  • Transition from an economy of resentment to an economy of trust and meaningful attention.
  • Support of socially significant, regional, scientific and children's content.
  • Media literacy as a compulsory competence of all ages.
  • Open labeling of advertising, synthetic content and conflicts of interest.
  • Dialogue formats in which different positions are heard and the logic of arguments is visible.

12.1. Drafting standard

  1. The fact is separated from the opinion.
  2. The source and degree of confidence are indicated.
  3. The error is corrected openly.
  4. Human dignity is not sacrificed to inclusion.
  5. A difficult topic is not reduced to the image of the enemy.

13. Education, science and transfer of skills

Education becomes a culture of continuous development, not just the transmission of standardized content. Science comes into public life as a way to honestly ask questions, test hypotheses, and understand the boundaries of knowledge.

13.1. Obligatory practices

PracticeResult
The Territory Service ProjectExperience of the common cause and real result
Workshop and craftLinking thinking, hands, quality and responsibility
Dialogue of generationstransfer of experience and renewal of tradition
Scientific researchCritical Thinking and Respect for Evidence
Art and Sceneimagination, expression, sharing
Environmental practicesUnderstanding Biocenosis and Recovery Culture
Media Laboratoryauthorship, fact-checking and digital security

13.2. Status of mentor

A mentor is not a controller or a carrier of ready-made answers, but a person who conveys skill, work ethics and the ability to make decisions independently. The system includes the training of mentors, a register of competencies, public recognition and remuneration.

14. Intercultural dialogue

Unity is built not through the erasure of differences, but through the ability to translate meanings, see the dignity of the other and create a common cause. Cultural policy ensures equal respect for peoples and traditions, with unconditional respect for human rights and the common legal space.

14.1. Four levels of dialogue

  • Knowledge: languages, history, religious and secular traditions.
  • Meeting: live communication, hospitality, cultural exchange.
  • Work together: work, volunteering, restoring the environment, creativity.
  • Shared responsibility: agreed norms of peace, dignity and justice.

15. Management system

15.1. The Cultural Solution Cycle

  1. Observation: data, history, map of the cultural environment.
  2. Dialogue: residents, experts, bearers of tradition, youth and partners.
  3. Design: purpose, theory of change, rights, resources and risks.
  4. Pilot: limited scale, open criteria and feedback.
  5. Verification: independent evaluation of outcome and unintended consequences.
  6. Scaling: only after confirmation of effectiveness and adaptation.
  7. System training: publication of experience, adjustment of standards and funding.

15.2. Organs and Responsibility

OrganResponsibility
Strategic Councilmission, values, long-term goals, interagency coordination
Public Chamber of the Programrepresentation of communities and protection of cultural rights
Scientific and Methodological Councilmethods, expertise, ethics of research and evaluation
Project Officeportfolio, resources, team training, replication
Data Center EQUILIBRIUMmonitoring, scenarios, map of imbalances and results
Independent Ombudsmancomplaints, conflicts of interest, protection of freedom of creativity

16. Outcome indicators

MeasurementExamples of indicators
Dignity and InclusionPercentage of people who feel respected and able to participate; accessibility for groups with disabilities
Trust and solidarityinterpersonal trust; participation in mutual assistance; sustainability of volunteer teams
Creative activityNumber of independent initiatives; percentage of projects living after grant
Cultural participationdiversity of practices; regularity; participation as an author, not just a viewer
ContinuityPercentage of intergenerational projects; number of active mentors
Quality of environmentaccessibility in step/digital form; aesthetics and safety assessment
Media maturityability to verify information; reducing involvement in harmful practices
Environmental ownershipparticipation in nature restoration; changes in local indicators
Economic sustainabilityincome of cultural teams; diversification of financing; decent employment

17. Road map 2026–2040

StageTimeframeMain results
I. Foundation2026–2027public discussion; program board; pilot standard; 13 pilot territories; digital prototype
II. Pilots2028–2030houses of creation; cultural passports; schools of mentorship; cooperatives; independent evaluation
III. Network2031–2035interregional network; sustainable financing; exchange of practices; integration with education and development of territories
IV. Norma2036–2040cultural rights are ensured everywhere; mature institutions of participation; international exchange; updated social standard

17.1. First year

  1. To approve a public charter of values and guarantees of freedom.
  2. Create an intersectoral working group and a scientific and methodological council.
  3. Select pilot areas of different types.
  4. Conduct cultural diagnostics and form passports of territories.
  5. Launch 20 design laboratories along the contours of culture.
  6. Establish a pilot fund and a transparent selection procedure.
  7. Expand the basic digital registry and public feedback.
  8. Prepare the first 260 mentors and facilitators.
  9. Publish an open report on results and errors.

18. Portfolio of First Initiatives

InitiativePurpose
House of CreationUniversal node of culture and public design
Living Memoryfamily and territorial archives, oral history, digital collections
Master of Russiaa network of mentors, craft and engineering workshops
The Cultural VolunteerServing people, heritage and nature
Media maturityfactchecking, attention security, ethics AI
The Court as a Communitysmall projects of good-neighborliness and joint improvement
Biocenosis of cultureArt and Civil Science for Nature Restoration
Co-operative of creators and mastersShared infrastructure, marketing and fair remuneration
Dialogue of generationsjoint expeditions, laboratories and public tasks
SFERA initiativesSingle showcase, cooperation, resources and confirmation of the result

19. Risks and guarantees

RiskWarranty
Ideological Unificationpluralism, freedom of creativity, independent ombudsman
Bureaucratizationfunding of the result, participation of residents, public data
Imitation of participationreal powers of public councils and transparent feedback
Commercialization of totalprotected basic financing of cultural rights
Digital controldata minimization, open algorithmic rules, human appeal
Resource grabs by interest groupsdeclaration of conflicts, competition, audit and rotation
Center and Territory GapSubsidiarity and the right of local adaptation
Exoticization of Traditionsparticipation of the carriers themselves and live development of practices
Rating for ratingmixed methods, independence and the right to explain the context

19.1. Inviolable grounds

  • Dignity and fundamental human rights.
  • Freedom of conscience, thought, speech and artistic expression within the law.
  • Equality of cultures and citizens before the law.
  • Protection of children, privacy and human authorship.
  • Inadmissibility of violence, humiliation and incitement to hatred.

20. Manifesto of the Culture of a New Order

1. We recognize a person not as a resource of the system, but as a bearer of dignity, freedom and a unique gift.

2. We build unity not on equality, but on mutual respect and common cause.

3. We return to work the meaning of skill, service and creation.

4. We accept heritage as a living conversation of generations, not as a fixed museum of the past.

5. We use technology to empower people and protect people from the exploitation of attention and data.

6. We do not consider nature an external resource, but a living basis for a common destiny.

7. We create a culture in which the strong respond, the knower shares, the needy gets support, and everyone can become part of a common future.

8. We measure success not by the volume of words, but by the growth of trust, dignity, skill, beauty, and the ability to act together.

9. We leave to future generations not only monuments and archives, but also working institutions of freedom, solidarity and creativity.

Annex. Passport of the pilot project

FieldContents
NameShort and clear name of the initiative
Territory and communityborders, groups of participants, cultural context
Issue addressedA verifiable description of the deficit or imbalance
Goalchange in the state of people, relationships or environment
Theory of changeWhy Actions Should Lead to Results
Rights and Ethicsrisks to freedom, privacy, dignity and diversity
Partners and rolesWho makes decisions, executes, finances, evaluates
Resourcesfinance, infrastructure, competence, data, time
Indicatorsreference point, target values, quality evidence
Verificationindependent evaluation and publication of the result
Resiliencemodel after initial funding
Scalingtransfer conditions and elements that cannot be unified

Readiness Checklist

  • The initiative responds to a real need confirmed by the participants.
  • There is a specific group that will be able to act, not just consume the service.
  • Roles and conflicts of interest are disclosed.
  • Cultural rights and exclusionary risks have been identified.
  • There are initial data and results criteria.
  • Open feedback and adjustment are provided.
  • After the pilot remains competence, communication or infrastructure.

Another published edition: CULTURE OF A NEW ORDER Культура_Нового_уклада.pptx · web text +

Doctrine of Creative Culture, Social Solidarity and Human Development

Dignity

Solidarity

Creation

Culture becomes the infrastructure of the future

Not the leisure industry, but the environment of human formation, trust and the ability of society to act together.

Meaning

The image of a common future

Connections

trust and cooperation

Norm

Justice and Responsibility

Action

Creative Initiative

Seven gaps require a common cultural response

Smyslova

Economic

Generational

Environmental

Territorial

Institutional

Digital

The main deficit is not the number of events, but the ability to turn cultural participation into sustainable relationships and joint action.

A new order connects five reciprocal transitions

Consumption

Co-creation

Competition without rules

Cooperation in the common case

Short horizon

Responsibility for the future

Unification

Unity while maintaining differences

Reporting event

Sustainable change in life

The value core holds freedom and the common good

Dignity

Care

Truth

Memory

Freedom

HUMANITY

AND COMMON BENEFITS

Beauty

Fairness

Measure

Solidarity

Creation

The New Order is evolving in nine dimensions.

Smyslova

Ethical

Emotionally

Understands the values

responsible for selection

Shows empathy

Intelligent

Creative

Social

Distinguish between fact and opinion

creates new solutions

Can cooperate

Digital

Environmental

Civil

Manages attention

Seeing the connection with nature

participates in the general case

13 Principles of Cultural Policy

Man is a goal

Creative work

Unity in diversity

Technological Humanity

Freedom of creativity

Environmental ownership

Availability

Partnership with responsibility

Subjectivity of communities

Evidence

Continuity

The Long Horizon

Dialogue of generations

20 contours connect culture and device of life

Family

Education

Science

Work

Entrepreneurship

Art

Heritage

Language

Media

The digital environment

Health

Sport

Nature

City and village

Right

Management

Security

Inter-ethnic dialogue

International cooperation

Future

Architecture connects observation, initiative and execution

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

ECO‑PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

observation, forecasting, balance

initiatives, expertise, cooperation

pooling resources for measurable results

Co-operative contour of execution

The state sets the rights and standards of transparency. Content is born in the free interaction of people and communities.

Cultural environment accompanies the entire life cycle

7–14

15–22

23–40

41–60

Game and Language

Inquisitive

Identity

Family and Profession

Mastery

transfer of experience

The general mechanism is intergenerational projects, mentoring and joint service of the territory.

Culture makes trust a value

Person

Community

Business

State

Time • Knowledge • Creativity

• trust • mutual assistance

Finance • Competence • Infrastructure

Rules • co-financing • objects

Cultural cooperative: joint infrastructure, equitable income distribution and preservation of local value

The digital environment expands access and protects people

OPPORTUNITIES

DIGITAL RIGHTS

Navigation by projects and spaces

Privacy and data control

Cultural passport of the territory

Labeling of synthetic content

Cooperation and co-financing

Human decision in important matters

Open Educational Collections

Authorship, remuneration and safety of the child

THE HOUSE OF CREATION

The House of Creation becomes a cultural hub of the territory

CULTURAL PASSPORT

Heritage and Local Stories

People, authors and mentors

Infrastructure and accessibility

Library

Workshop

Live Practices and Communities

MediaLab

small scene

Requirements and exclusion groups

Family Club

Project Office

Ideas, partners and growth points

Cultural solution goes through seven verification steps

Observation

Dialogue

Design

Pilot

Verification

Scaling

System training

Scaling is allowed only after confirmation of the result and verification of unforeseen consequences.

The result is a steady change, not a number of events.

Dignity

Trust

Respect and opportunity for participation

Mutual assistance and sustainable teams

Creation

Continuity

independent initiatives

mentors and projects of generations

Environment

Media maturity

accessibility, aesthetics, safety

Verification of information

Ecology

Resilience

Restoration of nature

income and decent employment

Transition to the New Order is calculated up to 2040

2026–2027

2028–2030

2031–2035

2036–2040

BASIC

PILOTS

NETWORKING

NORMA

Charter • Council • 13 Pilots

the House of Creation •

Interregional cooperation

Cultural rights everywhere

First initiatives create visible assemblage points

House of Creation

Living Memory

Master of Russia

Media maturity

Universal Node

Family and local archives

Network of mentors

ethics AI and factchecking

The Court as a Community

Biocenosis of culture

The Cultural Cooperative

SFERA initiatives

Good Neighbourhood

Restoration of nature

Infrastructure and Sales

cooperation and result

Freedom and transparency protect against substitution

Unification

Pluralism and freedom of creativity

Bureaucratization

Financing the result

Imitation of participation

The real power of communities

Digital control

data minimization and appeal

Seizing resources

audit, competition, rotation

Rating for rating

Mixed independent evaluation

Preserving Humans in an Era of Change

MANIFESTO

Create commonality without suppressing differences.

Transforming the image of a decent future

in everyday practice.

CERTAINTY • SOLIDARITY • CREATION

EQUILIBRIUM • Culture of a New Order • 2026

Published files

Platform · Full published text

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

Source Status: Primary Document

From scientific initiative to serial production, sustainable demand and scalable result

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/npp-asi-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Version 1.0 · 22 August 2026

Moscow

Status and purpose of the document

This document is a draft concept. It does not imply approval of the programme by the Agency for Strategic Initiatives and does not establish commitments for listed organizations. Participation of ASI, federal bodies, development institutions and other partners is subject to official approval, legal, financial and technical verification.

Summary for decision

NPP ASI "EQUILIBRIUM" is a proposed full-cycle research and production program. Its task is to bridge the gap between scientific development and serial implementation, forming a single trajectory from the initiative to a confirmed social, environmental and economic result.

The program is built around seven interrelated contours: strategic, initiative, scientific, industrial, financial and contract, territorial and digital. A special role is given to the model ECO-PPA - a system of long-term contracts for measurable results that can form the projected demand and the basis for project financing.

ContourFunctionProposed outcome
ASISelection of initiatives, removal of barriers, work with regions and scalingPortfolio of decisions of federal and regional significance
EQUILIBRIUMMonitoring, modeling, balancing of resources and resultsDigital Single Picture Program
ECO‑PPALong-term energy order, resource, environmental or social impactPredictable revenue and investment base
SPECZASHCHITACo-operative Organization of Execution and Assembly of ConsortiumsProduction chains and project teams
Science and educationResearch, expertise, personnel, testingConfirmed technology and competences
Business and regionsProduction, sites, operation, procurement of the resultPilots, production facilities and jobs

Proposed action

  1. Agree on the development of the program passport and the creation of an organizing committee.
  2. Identify 3–5 pilot regions and at least 10 first technological projects.
  3. Develop standard regulations for selection, examination, piloting and ECO-PPA.
  4. To form a scientific and technical council, an industrial council and an investment committee.
  5. Launch a digital register of initiatives, projects, indicators and confirmed results.
  6. Following the results of the pilot cycle, prepare a proposal for federal scaling.

Contents

  1. 1. Passport of the program
  2. 2. Strategic context and issues
  3. 3. Mission, purpose and principles
  4. 4. Target Model and Architecture
  5. 5. 19 scientific and production directions
  6. 6. Full cycle project conveyor
  7. 7. Mechanism ECO‑PPA
  8. 8. Management system and roles of participants
  9. 9. Financial model
  10. 10. Digital Platform EQUILIBRIUM
  11. 11. The Pilot Portfolio
  12. 12. Performance indicators
  13. 13. Road map
  14. 14. Risks and control
  15. 15. Package of solutions for launch
  16. Annexes

1. Passport of the program

ParameterContents
Full nameScientific and production program of strategic initiatives "EQUILIBRIUM".
Short nameNPP ASI "EQUILIBRIUM".
Document typeDraft inter-sectoral programme concept.
HorizonPilot cycle — 2026–2028 years; scaling up to 2030 year; further horizon is determined by results.
MissionTo ensure the transformation of scientific and technological initiatives into serial solutions that improve the sustainability of the economy, territories, natural systems and the quality of life.
GoalCreate a replicable full-cycle mechanism: an initiative → Expertise → Co-operation → resource support → Pilot → Confirmed result → Scaling.
SubjectScientific developments, technological products, production projects, territorial complexes and systems of measurable effect.
Project operatorIt is determined by the decision of the participants; the project office of the NPP with the participation of ASI and authorized partners is offered.
Platform frameworkEQUILIBRIUM is a digital environment for observation, forecasting, coordination and control.
Contractual frameworkECO-PPA is a family of long-term supply agreements and a confirmed result.
Cooperative frameworkSPECZASHCHITA and other accredited cooperative/industrial operators.
Scale19 program directions; detailing up to 13 sub-directions in each contour - after industry expertise.
FinancingMixed model: grants, R&D, subsidies, project financing, PPP, corporate order, long-term contracts, investment capital.
Key resultA portfolio of technologies and facilities brought to industrial operation and sustainable demand.

2. Strategic context and issues

Russia has a strong scientific school, engineering competencies, resource base and large-scale domestic demand. However, the transition from research to mass application often breaks down into unrelated stages: the developer does not see the customer, the industrialist does not see the confirmed market, the investor does not see the projected cash flow, and the region does not see the solution with clear responsibility.

2.1. Key gaps

  • between basic and applied science;
  • between prototype and industrial design;
  • between the pilot and the serial order;
  • between the environmental effect and its economic assessment;
  • between sectoral departments and territorial management;
  • between multiple initiatives and a single portfolio of priorities;
  • between financing capital costs and paying for the result of the life cycle.

2.2. Required transition

Current LogicTarget logic
Support for selected activitiesManaging a portfolio of measurable results
Cost financingFinancing the achievement and exploitation of the result
Separated PilotsTypical solutions with conditions of replication
Activity reportingVerification of technological, social and environmental effects
Departmental isolationInterdepartmental and intersectoral cooperation
Short-term procurementLife cycle contract and ECO-PPA

3. Mission, purpose and principles

3.1. Mission

To create a Russian system of knowledge transformation into a productive force that ensures technological sovereignty, security, environmental recovery and improving the quality of life.

3.2. Strategic objective

By the year 2030, a working scientific and production conveyor capable of annually bringing the selected initiatives to confirmed pilots, serial production and long-term contracts will be formed.

3.3. Principles

Full life cycle. The solution is considered from research to operation, maintenance and disposal.

Evidence. Each result is confirmed by measurements, independent examination and traceable data.

technological sovereignty. Priority for Russian competencies, critical components and localization.

Cooperation. Participants pool resources around a common program while maintaining legal and economic autonomy.

Results instead of process. Funding and evaluation are tied to readiness, impact and implementation.

Safety of the project. Technical, environmental, information and financial security are laid at the start.

Open scalability. The architecture allows the connection of new regions, industries and partner countries.

Balance of interests. Decisions take into account the interests of the state, people, business, territory and the natural environment.

4. Target Model and Architecture

The target model includes seven contours that work simultaneously and do not replace each other.

ContourKey issueMechanism
StrategicWhat tasks have a national priority?Program Council, map of challenges and priorities.
InitiativeWhat solutions and teams are there?SFERA initiatives, open and targeted selection.
ScientificDoes the technology work and how ready is it?Examination, TRL, testing, R&D.
ProductionWho and where will make the decision?Consortiums, Industrial Partners, SPECZASHCHITA.
Financial and ContractualWhat is the object created and paid for?Mixed funding and ECO-PPA.
TerritorialWhere will the effect be?Pilot regions, municipalities, enterprises.
DigitalHow to see the state and make decisions?EQUILIBRIUM: registers, digital twins, monitoring.

5. Nineteen research and production areas

№Area of workContents
01Distributed and autonomous energySmall generation, microgrids, hybrid complexes, energy stability of territories.
02Energy storage and managementDrives, power electronics, forecasting and dispatching.
03Eco-modules of lifeAutonomous modules of housing, infrastructure, water, energy, communications and recycling.
04Water technologyCleaning, reuse, monitoring, desalination and protection of water bodies.
05The circular economySorting, processing, material return, industrial symbiosis.
06Restoration of soils and territoriesReclamation, soil stabilization, restoration of fertility and landscapes.
07Materials of the new generationHigh purity materials, composites, coatings, functional and secondary materials.
08Green Building and HousingEnergy-efficient buildings, network modernization, digital resource management.
09Environmental transport and logisticsLow-emission transport, charging and service infrastructure, flow optimization.
10Agro- and biotechnologyClosed farms, biologics, soil microbiology, food sustainability.
11Biocenous monitoringAutonomous observation points for air, water, soil, biodiversity and load.
12Climatic adaptationManaging the risks of heat, floods, fires, droughts and degradation of natural systems.
13Industrial automationRobotization, predictive maintenance, quality control, lean manufacturing.
14Industrial Artificial IntelligenceModels for designing, operating, optimizing and supporting solutions.
15Digital twinsModels of enterprises, cities, infrastructure and natural and technical systems.
16Medicine, rehabilitation and healthRehabilitation complexes, assistive technologies, prevention and health saving.
17Safety and resilienceEarly warning, protection of infrastructure, sustainability of chains and facilities.
18Personnel and engineering educationDesign schools, practices, scientific tourism, training of operators of new industries.
19Standards, Verification and ExportsTesting, certification, ESG-IR, international recognition and export packages.

Each direction can be detailed up to 13 sub-directions. Final Matrix 19 × 13 is formed not mechanically, but after sectoral expertise, analysis of national goals, technological priorities and real portfolio of projects.

6. Full cycle project conveyor

StageContentsBenchmark
1. LoginRegistration of the initiative, rights holder, team, need and expected effect.Project card.
2. ScreeningAlignment with priorities; checks of completeness, safety and conflicts of interest.Decision on admission.
3. ExpertiseScientific, technological, legal, patent, market and financial assessment.Expert opinion.
4. DesignProfile, KPIs, budget, schedule, data architecture and risk architecture.Pilot design.
5. CooperationSelection of manufacturers, a site, a customer, an investor and a verifier.Consortium.
6. Resource supportFunding for R&D, CAPEX, working capital and infrastructure.Financial close.
7. PilotCreation of a sample / object and operation in specified conditions.Pilot protocol.
8. VerificationMeasurement of results, data audit, reliability assessment and life-cycle assessment.Confirmed effect.
9. CertificationCompliance with mandatory requirements and voluntary standards.Approval for use.
10. ContractSupply contract, service contract, concession, off-take or ECO-PPA.Guaranteed demand.
11. SeriesOrganization of production, quality control, logistics and service.A series-production product.
12. ScalingReplication, localisation, export and training of new operators.Network of implementations.

6.1. Technological readiness system

To unify solutions, it is recommended to apply the scale of technological readiness levels (TRL) with the addition of production, market and regulatory readiness levels. The transition between the stages is carried out only after passing the control gate.

  • TRL - confirmation of the technology;
  • MRL - readiness of the production process;
  • CRL - Customer and market readiness;
  • RRL - regulatory and certification readiness;
  • IRL - integration readiness to work in a larger system.

7. Mechanism ECO‑PPA

ECO-PPA is proposed as a family of long-term agreements in which the subject of payment is not only the energy supplied, but also a measurable resource, environmental, infrastructure or social result.

Type of agreementSubjectExample of indicator
Energy PPAElectric/thermal energykW·h, Gcal, power availability.
Efficiency PPASavings ResourceDecrease in consumption relative to the baseline.
Water PPAPrepared or saved waterm³, quality, reuse.
Waste PPAProcessing and return of materialsTons, extraction share, quality of recyclables.
Nature/Restoration PPARestoration of the natural systemArea, biodiversity index, soil condition.
Infrastructure PPAAvailability and quality of infrastructure functionReadiness, reliability, coverage.
Social Impact PPAConfirmed social outcomeRehabilitation outcome, service availability, employment.

7.1. Mandatory elements ECO‑PPA

  1. Baseline and measurement method.
  2. Results and quality requirements.
  3. Term, volume, price and indexation formula.
  4. Responsibility for creation, operation and maintenance.
  5. Data access and independent verification.
  6. Adjustment mechanism when conditions change.
  7. Distribution of technological, market and regulatory risks.
  8. Conditions for early termination, replacement of the operator and transfer of the object.

8. Management system and roles of participants

OrganFunctionsComposition / principle
Strategic CouncilPriorities, key decisions, interagency coordination.Authorized representatives of the state, ASI and key partners.
Scientific and Technical CouncilTechniques, expertise, technological gates, ethics and security.Scientists, engineers, industry experts, test centers.
The Industrial CouncilCooperation, localization, production, quality and service.Enterprises, CCI, RSPP, industry associations.
Investment CommitteeFinancial models, risks, instruments and financing conditions.Development institutions, banks, foundations, customers.
Project OfficeDaily portfolio management, regulations, reporting and support.Professional team of the program.
Regional officesPlatforms, permits, infrastructure, regional support measures.Authorities, development corporations, municipalities.
Verification CenterMetrics, baselines, data and effects audits.Independent accredited organizations.

8.1. Proposed roles

ParticipantProposed role
ASIInitiatives, support services, barriers, regions, leadership projects and replication.
Profile MinistriesRegulatory policy, state programs, sectoral priorities and support measures.
RAS, universities, RECScientific expertise, R&D, laboratories, human resources and research infrastructure.
RF CCI and regional chambersSearch for enterprises, business expertise, interregional and external cooperation.
RSPP and Industry UnionsCorporate demand, industrial partners, standards and scaling.
SPECZASHCHITAAssembly of project consortia and cooperative organization of execution.
EQUILIBRIUMDigital registry, analytics, resource balance, digital twins, monitoring KPI.
RegionsNeeds, sites, infrastructure, permitting processes and regional order.
Banks and fundsFinancing, guarantees, risk assessment and investment discipline.
CustomersTerms of reference, acceptance of the result, long-term contract and operation.

9. Financial model

The financial architecture must be appropriate to the project stage. In the early stages, grant and budget risk instruments predominate, in the later stages project financing, corporate order and cash flow under long-term contracts.

StageNeedPossible tools
ResearchScientific hypothesis, laboratory base, team.Grants, research, targeted funding, university programs.
PrototypeDesign work, materials, tests.R&D, venture financing, corporate accelerator.
PilotEquipment, site, connection, monitoring.Subsidies, regional support, partner funding.
First seriesLine, working capital, certification.Preferential loan, bank loan, leasing, guarantees.
ScalingNetwork of facilities and production facilities.Project financing, PPP, concession, bonds/CFA with legal admissibility.
OperationService, service, purchase of the result.Revenue from ECO to PPA, service or life contract.

9.1. The principle of financial discipline

  • separate accounting of funds by projects and stages;
  • financing in tranches after the control gate;
  • a unified register of contracts, obligations and results;
  • independent technical and financial control;
  • banning double funding of one result;
  • disclosure of beneficiaries, conflicts of interest and intellectual property rights;
  • reservation of funds for operation, service and decommissioning.

10. Digital Platform EQUILIBRIUM

EQUILIBRIUM serves as the digital environment of the program, but does not replace state information systems and departmental registers. Integration is carried out on the basis of agreements, security requirements and data legislation.

ModulePurpose
Register of initiativesUnified development cards, teams, rights and statuses.
Map of needsRequests from regions, enterprises and industries.
Roster of expertsCompetence, independence, history of conclusions.
Program PortfolioStages, control gates, resources, deadlines and solutions.
Digital twinsModeling of object, territory and scenarios.
Outline ECO-PPABasic lines, indicators, delivery and payment schedules.
Biocenose monitoringObservation point data and ecosystem status indices.
Management dashboardRisks, deviations, effects and the need for solutions.
Verification outlineOrigin of data, measurement protocols, conclusions.
Knowledge CenterStandards, model documents, project results and lessons.

10.1. Data requirements

  • traceability of the origin and changes in data;
  • access differentiation and logging of actions;
  • compatibility with Russian information security requirements;
  • machine-readable metrics and open interfaces where permissible;
  • storage of evidence, protocols and versions of methods;
  • minimization of personal and sensitive data;
  • Independent audit of algorithms that influence funding and admission decisions.

11. Proposed pilot portfolio

№PilotContentsBase area
1EcomoduleAutonomous complex of energy, water, communications, housing and processing for remote territory.Region / municipality
2Mini-generationHybrid local power system with storage and digital control.Social or industrial facility
3Biocenous pointContinuous monitoring of air, water, soil, biodiversity and load.OPPT / industrial zone
4Closed water cycleWater purification and reuse with quality assurance.Company / Housing
5Material processingReturn of valuable components and safe disposal of complex waste.Industrial cluster
6Soil stabilizationTechnology of strengthening the grounds and restoration of disturbed lands.Road / construction object
7High purity materialsThe pilot line for obtaining materials 6N and the accompanying quality system.Scientific and Production Site
8BiofarmClosed agrobiotechnological module with resource monitoring.Rural area
9Rehabilitation moduleComplex of diagnostics, recovery and human support.Medical / Social Organization
10Digital twinModel of resources, infrastructure and risks of pilot territory.Regional Project Office

11.1. Criteria for selecting a pilot

  • strategic importance and confirmed need of the customer;
  • technological readiness sufficient for testing in real conditions;
  • the presence of the right holder and an understandable model of intellectual rights;
  • measurable result and the ability to set a baseline;
  • platform, responsible operator and access to infrastructure;
  • certification plan and regulatory feasibility;
  • financial model of the first series and the potential for replication;
  • acceptable safety and risk profile.

12. Performance indicators

The indicators should be fixed after the initial inventory. The following are the proposed pilot cycle benchmarks that need to be agreed with participants and the financial model.

GroupIndicatorTarget by the end of 2028
PortfolioPassed primary screeningat least 100 initiatives
ExpertiseObtained a comprehensive conclusionat least 50 projects
PilotsLaunched in real conditionsat least 19 pilots
VerificationConfirmed the stated resultat least 12 projects
ProductionMoved to the first seriesat least 10 solutions
ContractingLong-term contracts concluded / ECO-PPAat least 10 agreements
GeographyParticipate in the pilot circuitat least 5 regions
CooperationScientific and industrial partners are connectedat least 50 organizations
StandardsMethods and model documents developedat least 5 packages
ExportsProposals for foreign marketsat least 5 solutions

12.1. Balance of indicators

It is unacceptable to evaluate the program only by the number of events, applications or participants. The top-level index should take into account five dimensions: technological readiness, production readiness, economic sustainability, confirmed effect and scale of implementation.

13. Road map

PeriodStageKey results
0–3 monthsOrganizationOrganizing committee; program passport; regulations; partner card; preliminary portfolio.
3–6 monthsDesignExamination; selection of regions; model documents; data architecture; financial models.
6–12 monthsPilot trainingthe consortiums; TK; sites; permits; financing; basic measurements.
12–24 monthsPilotingCreation of facilities; operation; monitoring; adjustment; certification.
18–30 monthsFirst seriesProduction training; contracts; service; training of operators.
24–36 monthsScalingCirculation; regional packages; exports; proposals for institutionalization.

13.1. First 100 days

  1. Designate a responsible action team and secretariat.
  2. Agree on terminology, program boundaries and outcome criteria.
  3. Build a registry of at least 30 source initiatives and 20 technology needs.
  4. Conduct rapid screening and select 10 projects for in-depth examination.
  5. Identify 3–5 potential pilot regions.
  6. Prepare a standard project passport, consortium agreement and structure ECO-PPA.
  7. Develop a prototype digital registry and portfolio panel.
  8. To hold a strategic session with scientific, industrial and financial partners.
  9. Prepare an estimate of the pilot cycle and a list of sources of funding.
  10. To submit a package of decisions for consideration by the authorized bodies of the program.

14. Risks and control system

RiskLevelManagement measures
Substitution of the result with activityHighCheck gate, measurable KPI, independent verification.
Insufficient maturity of technologyHighTRL/MRL-audit, step-by-step, backup technical solutions.
Absence of customerHighProof of need before pilot funding; preliminary offtake.
Regulatory IncompatibilityMedium/HighLegal examination at the entrance, regulatory road map.
Conflict of intellectual rightsHighPatent audit, contractual fixation of rights and licenses.
Increase in cost and timingHighIndependent estimates, reserves, stage financing, change control.
Inaccuracy of environmental effectHighBasic line, M&V methodology, data audit, independent verifier.
Dependence on one supplierMediumLocalization, alternative components, insurance stock.
Cyber and information threatsHighThreat model, segmentation, domestic protection, audit.
Reputational risksMediumCorrect positioning of status, public evidence, ethical control.

15. Package of solutions for launch

To move from the concept to the current program, it is proposed to prepare and agree on the following set of documents:

  1. decision to establish an organizing committee.
  2. Passport NPP ASI "EQUILIBRIUM".
  3. Regulations on the management system and project office.
  4. Regulations for selection, examination and passing of the control gate.
  5. Methodology for assessing technological, production and market readiness.
  6. Standard passport of the scientific and production project.
  7. Model agreement of the project consortium.
  8. Measurement and verification of results.
  9. Concept and model structure ECO-PPA.
  10. Regulation on the digital registry and data handling.
  11. Criteria for the selection of pilot regions and facilities.
  12. Financial model and budget of the pilot cycle.
  13. Communication strategy without premature statements of official status.
  14. Plan of legal, antimonopoly, procurement and information security expertise.

Annex 1. Project Card

FieldContent required
1. NameBrief and full name of the initiative.
2. InitiatorOrganization, team, contact person.
3. ProblemConfirmed need and scale.
4. DecisionTechnology, product, object or service.
5. ReadinessTRL / MRL / CRL / RRL / IRL.
6. Intellectual rightsRights holders, patents, licenses, restrictions.
7. CustomerPotential buyer or recipient of the result.
8. PlaygroundRegion, facility, infrastructure conditions.
9. IndicatorsBase line, units, target values.
10. BudgetR & D, CAPEX, OPEX, Reserve and Sources.
11. Team and cooperationCompetences, manufacturers, experts, operator.
12. RisksTechnical, legal, financial, environmental.
13. ScalingSeriality, market, localization, export.

Annex 2. Minimum composition of expert opinion

  • summary and unambiguous recommendation: allow, modify or reject;
  • assessment of scientific novelty and evidence;
  • assessment of technological and production readiness;
  • patent purity and the right to result;
  • safety requirements and environmental restrictions;
  • analysis of the market, the customer and competitive solutions;
  • Financial feasibility and sensitivity of the model;
  • a list of assumptions, data gaps and mandatory conditions;
  • pilot plan, criteria for success and termination;
  • potential for replication and systemic effect.

Annex 3. Terminological minimum

TermWorking definition
InitiativeA proposal to create or implement a solution that has not yet passed a full qualification cycle.
ProjectInitiative with approved passport, resources, responsible and control results.
PilotLimited implementation in real conditions to test predefined hypotheses.
VerificationConfirmation of the reliability of the data and the result achieved according to the established methodology.
ScalingReproducible implementation of the solution at new facilities without loss of quality and economy.
ECO‑PPAA long-term supply agreement and/or a proven resource, environmental, infrastructure or social outcome.
EQUILIBRIUMProposed digital and organizational environment for program observation, forecasting, coordination and control.
Check gateFormalized point of the decision to continue, adjust, suspend or terminate the project.

Conclusion

NPP ASI "EQUILIBRIUM" is proposed not as another list of initiatives, but as a discipline for bringing initiatives to results. Its meaning is to combine the strengths of science, state, industry, regions and society into a reproducible system, where each project has a customer, an evidence base, a production chain, a financial model and an understandable effect.

The program can become a practical outline of the image of the future: a technologically sovereign economy in which the development of production simultaneously strengthens security, restores the natural balance and improves the quality of human life.

Other published edition: "EQUILIBRIUM" NPP_ACI_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

A single mechanism for turning scientific initiatives into serial production and scalable result

NPP ASI

Draft concept for discussion and formal harmonization

EQUILIBRIUM

22 August 2026

Strong developments are lost between science and the market

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

Today, the path of technology is breaking down into unrelated sections

KEYWORD

DIVISIONS

SCIENCE

No guaranteed customer

PROTOTIP

Not ready for serial production

Idea

PILOT

does not go to scale

Series

INVESTOR

I don’t see predictable cash flow.

We need a full cycle path.

REGION

does not receive a ready-made solution with the responsible operator

The program combines seven contours into one system

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

STRATEGY

INITIATIVES

SCIENCE

PRODUCTION

FINANCE

TERRITORIES

DATA

national objectives

Solutions and Teams

Expertise and R&D

Collaboration and series

Capital and contract

Pilots and implementation

control of the result

Outcome: a single portfolio of projects with customer, manufacturer, financing and measurable effect

The initiative goes through twelve control stages

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

Sign in

Screening

Expertise

Design

Cooperation

Financing

Pilot

Verification

Certification

Contract

Series

Scale

Transition between stages - only after confirmation of readiness, data and responsibility

19 areas cover resource and industrial basis

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

Distributed Energy

Energy storage

Eco-modules

Water technology

Closed loop

Soil restoration

New materials

Green Building

Environmental transport

Agro- and biotechnology

The first circuit is the production of energy, resources, materials and sustainable infrastructure

Digital, social and institutional contours complete the system

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

Biocenous monitoring

Climatic adaptation

Industrial automation

Industrial AI

Digital twins

Medicine and rehabilitation

Safety and resilience

Engineering personnel

Standards and exports

Each direction is detailed up to 13 sub-directions after industry expertise

ECO-PPA converts the confirmed effect into sustainable demand

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

Classic PPA Paying for energy. ECO‑PPA Expands long-term order item.

ENERGY

energy

FINANCIAL LOGIC

EFFICIENCY

Saved Resource

WATER

Prepared water

Measurable result

WASTE

recycled materials

Long term contract

NATURE

The restored ecosystem

INFRA

Accessibility of infrastructure

project financing

SOCIAL

Confirmed social outcome

Each participant is responsible for their own outcome

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

ASI

Initiatives · barriers · regions · scaling

EQUILIBRIUM

Registry · Analytics · Digital Twins · KPI

SPECZASHCHITA

consortia · cooperation · execution

SCIENCE

Examination · R&D · Test · Frames

BUSINESS

production · service · corporate demand

REGIONS

Platform · infrastructure · regional order

BANKS AND FUNDS

Funding · guarantees · risk management

Management is built around decisions, not actions

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

STRATEGIC COUNCIL

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL COUNCIL

INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

Priorities and inter-agency coordination

methods, expertise and safety

Financial models and risks

PROJECT OFFICE

Regional offices

Daily Portfolio Management

sites, permissions and infrastructure

Independent Verification Center Confirms Data and Effect

The first portfolio - ten demonstration projects

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

Ecomodule

Mini-generation

Biocenous point

Closed water cycle

Material processing

Soil stabilization

High purity materials

Biofarm

Rehabilitation module

Digital twin of the territory

Selection criterion: pilot readiness + customer + site + measurable result + series potential

The funding tool changes with the maturity of the project

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

RESEARCH

PROTOTIP

PILOT

FIRST SERIES

MASSHTAB

EXPLOITATION

Grants ·

R&D · Ventures

Subsidies · Partners

Loan · leasing · guarantees

Project financing · PPP

ECO-PPA · service contract

Funding — in tranches after the control gate

Separate accounting · independent estimates · disclosure of rights and conflicts of interest

EQUILIBRIUM gives management a single picture of the program

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

INITIATIVE REGISTER

CONTOUR ECO-PPA

teams, rights, readiness

baselines and commitments

MAP OF NEEDS

MONITORING

requests from regions and industries

Data of objects and biocenoses

PROJECT PORTFOLIO

VERIFICATION

Stages, resources, risks

Origin of data and conclusions

DIGITAL DOUBLE

PANEL OF THE MANAGER

Scenarios of objects and territories

Deviations and solutions

Data does not replace solutions; it makes them verifiable.

100+

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

The pilot cycle is assessed by implementation, not activity

Initiatives

the Screening

Integrated

Expertise

Pilots

in real conditions

decisions

in the first series

regions

the Outline

Projects with a proven effect

long-term contracts / ECO-PPA

Model Methods and Standards

Guidelines require approval after the initial inventory and budget calculation

In 36 months, the program goes from concept to scale

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

6–12

12–24

18–30

24–36

Organization

Design

Preparation

Pilots

First series

Scale

passport · organizing committee · regulations

examination · regions · standard documents

consortia · sites · financing

creation · operation · verification

production · contracts · service

replication · export · institutionalization

Key milestone

The first confirmed pilots and contracts should form the basis for the first series

The first 100 days should end with a ready launch package

NPP ASI “EQUILIBRIUM”

Organizing Committee and Secretariat

Common terminology and program boundaries

30 initiatives and 20 technology needs

10 in-depth examination projects

3–5 Pilot Regions

Standard passport and consortium agreement

Structure ECO-PPA

Digital Registry Prototype

Pilot cycle estimates

Management Solutions Package

Run 100 - day pre-project stage

PROPOSED SOLUTION

NPP ASI

"EQUILIBRIUM"

Outcome of the phase

agreed passport program

Science → production

→ confirmed result

→ Scaling

Proven Pilot Portfolio

Management and Digital Control Model

Draft budget and sources of funding

Model agreements, including ECO-PPA

Draft concept

Published files

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Technology, industry and energy

Applied resources on technologies, modifiers, materials, industry and energy solutions. The package contains public texts and available source files; publication alone does not confirm implementation.

Materials: 13 · with full text: 13 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Technology · Full published text

SPECZASHCHITA Underwater Robotics

Source Status: Primary Document

Underwater robotic systems for science, industry, ecology, safety and shipbuilding.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/gidrorobototekhnika-speczashchita

Open on the site

Version: strategic research and project package • 2026

1. Brief summary

Hydrorobotics is a technological circuit of underwater robotic systems, combining autonomous vehicles AUV, telecontrolled ROV, underwater gliders, bottom stations, hydroacoustics, navigation, sensors, manipulators, AI-data processing and service infrastructure. For SPECZASHCHITA, it is not a separate instrument market, but an applied control system for water areas, ports, shipbuilding assets, pipelines, cables, hydraulic structures, biocenoses and underwater infrastructure.

  • Purpose: to form the Russian production and scientific contour of full-cycle hydro-robotics.
  • Support customers: shipbuilding, ports, transport, energy, ecology, science, rescue services, security.
  • Principle: apparatus + Sensory + Communication + Data + Service + operating regulations.
  • The result: a series of pilot systems, a test site, an industry-specific solution registry and a scaling program.

2. Why Strategic Topics

  • Most underwater objects are not visible to conventional means of observation; robotization turns the water area into a measurable and manageable environment.
  • Shipbuilding gets a new market: not only ships, but also carriers, docking stations, launch-lifting devices, service vessels, data centers and crew training.
  • Environmental monitoring receives constant measurements: water, sediments, biocenoses, pollution, the state of hydraulic structures.
  • Security receives search, survey, demining, port, cable, pipeline and critical infrastructure security tools.
  • Materials science becomes the core: housings, composites, technical ceramics, syntactic foam, coatings, sealing, optics, power electronics.

3. Taxonomy of systems

ClassFunctionStrengthsLimitations
AUVAutonomous survey, cartography, route missionsRange, stealth, reducing the load on the vesselMore difficult communication and return, limited intervention
ROVAccurate inspection, repair, manipulation, samplingReal time, operator control, power workCable, Ship/Energy Dependence
GliderLong-term monitoring of the ocean and water areasEnergy efficiency, months of missions, large areasLow speed, limited payload
Donnaya StationContinuous monitoring of the environment and infrastructureLong measurements, sensor network, change controlNeed installation, power, communication, maintenance
Hybrid AUV/ROVAutonomous transition + controlled operationThe best of the two classes, a promising nicheComplexity of certification and architecture

4. Platform architecture SPECZASHCHITA

  • Project office: forms TK, cooperation, pilot’s passport, test calendar, financing and validation models.
  • Engineering core: design bureaus, electronics, hydroacoustics, software, materials, testing.
  • Shipbuilding contour: carrier vessels, docking stations, lifting devices, repair capacities and fleet service.
  • Data and AI: digital twin of the water area, sonar processing, video analytics, object recognition, predictive repair.
  • Ecological contour: monitoring of water, bottom, biota, pollution, bottom sediments, dynamics of biocenoses.
  • Security: survey of water areas, underwater search, control of ports and facilities, engineering intelligence.

5. Key technological modules

ModuleContents
Body and buoyancytitanium/aluminum/composites, syntactic foam, hermoblocks, pressure protection
MovementScrew thrusters, vector thrust, steering wheels, glider wings, energy efficiency
EnergyLi-ion/LiFePO4, BMS, dock charging, cable power supply ROV, hybrid solutions
NavigationINS, DVL, USBL/LBL, acoustic beacons, bathymetry, algorithms SLAM
SensorsSide view sonar, multibeam echo sounder, cameras, CTD, turbidity, water chemistry, magnetometer
ContactROV cable, acoustic modems, optical communication, buoy repeater, satellite channel
Manipulatorsgrippers, cutters, sampling probes, brushes, inspection and repair tools
Software and AImission planning, object recognition, 3D-reconstruction, reports, data archive

6. Connection with shipbuilding, USC, VTB, Inmortrans and Ocean 80

Hydro-robotics should be integrated into the shipbuilding package SPECZASHCHITA as a separate product line around carrier vessels, service bases, port infrastructure and offshore test sites. In conjunction with the previously prepared contour of the USC - VTB - Inmortrans - Ocean 80, this direction can become a practical pilot: from the design of devices to serial maintenance of water areas.

  • USC: carriers, shipyards, repair, marine engineering, integration of robotics into ships and ports.
  • VTB: project financing, leasing, investment model, control of execution and assets.
  • SPECZASHCHITA: project office, cooperation, register of participants, pilots, interaction with customers.
  • Inmortrans: scientific and methodological and transport-sea contour, regulations and operational models.
  • Ocean 80: pilot operation, missions in water areas, training, demonstration projects.

7. Pilot programs

Pilot 1. Inspection of port infrastructure

ROV + Sonar + video analytics for berths, hydraulic structures, cables and pipelines.

Pilot 2. Ecological water area

AUV/Glider + bottom stations for monitoring water, sediments, biocenoses and pollution.

Pilot 3. Shipbuilding service

Underwater inspection of hulls of ships, propeller-rudder groups, docks, berths, underwater parts of structures.

Pilot 4. Search and Security

Complex for search of objects, bottom surveys, water area control and rescue support.

Pilot 5. Materials and coatings

Testing of hulls, composites, ceramics, coatings, sealants, optics and electronics in the marine environment.

8. Road map 2026–2030

StageTimeframeResultCheckpoint
0. Passport of project0–2 monthsTK, cooperation, estimate, customer mapApproved project passport
1. Demonstrator3–6 monthsROV- Inspector + Sensor Package + ReportingField test in the water area
2. Polygon6–12 monthsTest base, regulations, training of operatorsFirst 50 missions
3. Liner12–24 monthsAUV, ROV, glider, bottom station, serviceSerial prototypes
4. Scaling24–48 monthsRegional centers, leasing, service contracts10+ water area/ports
5. Exports and standards36–60 monthsStandards, register, international projectsCertification and export package

9. KPI and effects

  • Technical KPI: depth, autonomy, positioning accuracy, communication stability, sonar data quality, percentage of successful missions.
  • Economic KPI: cost of one mission, reduction of diving costs, share of domestic components, revenue of service contracts.
  • Ecological KPI: frequency of monitoring, coverage of water areas, rate of pollution detection, completeness of the digital archive of observations.
  • Security: reducing search time, increasing control of ports and underwater facilities, reducing risks to people.
  • Shipbuilding: new product line, loading of shipyards and KB, life cycle service market.

10. What to do immediately

  • Appoint a head project office and a technical integrator.
  • To collect a register of Russian and friendly competencies: KB, electronics, hydroacoustics, materials, software, shipyards, polygons.
  • Choose 2–3 starting water areas for demonstrations: port, shipbuilding facility, ecological landfill.
  • Prepare a line of TS: ROV- Inspector, AUV-cartograph, glider monitor, bottom station, data center.
  • To form a financial scheme: grant / R & D, leasing, service contracts, industrial consortium.
  • Embed hydrorobotics in the package SPECZASHCHITA - Shipbuilding as a separate program.

11. Sources and benchmarks for verification

  1. WHOI: Autonomous Underwater Vehicles - Class Overview AUV and examples of application. https://www.whoi.edu/what-we-do/explore/underwater-vehicles/auvs/
  2. WHOI: AUV Sentry - depth to 6000 m, seafloor mapping and survey missions. https://www.whoi.edu/oceanrobots/robots/sentry-phone.html
  3. WHOI: Nereid Under Ice - Hybrid ROV/AUV and micro-optical cable. https://www.whoi.edu/what-we-do/explore/underwater-vehicles/hybrid-vehicles/nereid-under-ice/
  4. NOAA Ocean Exploration: Technology ROV, manipulators, sampling tools. https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explainers/technology/
  5. Rostec, 2025: telemetry systems for underwater demining robots. https://www.rostec.ru/en/media/news/rostec-has-supplied-a-batch-of-telemetry-systems-for-underwater-demining-robots/
  6. the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation, 2025: USC and Dredging Fleet Renewal. https://www.mintrans.gov.ru/press-center/branch-news/6256
  7. DOAJ, 2025: Structural-parametric synthesis of AUV for mineral resources complex. https://doaj.org/article/50d3c9f427204778a5c0188d09060b03
  8. TrackDyne: USBL/LBL, acoustic modems and underwater communication as a technological reference point. https://www.trackdyne.com/

Other published edition: SPECZASHCHITA • Hydrorobotics • 1 Hydrorobotics_Specification_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

Why Russia Hydro-Robotics

The water area becomes manageable only when it is measured regularly and safely

Infrastructure

Ecology

Science

Security

Ports, berths, GTS, cables, pipelines, docks and ship hulls

Water, sediments, biocenoses, pollution, operational tests

Bottom mapping, oceanology, hydrology, biology, climate data

Search, protection of water areas, inspection of dangerous objects, rescue tasks

• New market for shipbuilding: carriers, docking stations, service vessels, test ranges.

• New product line SPECZASHCHITA: Apparatus + Data + Service + operating regulations.

• Critical contour of import independence: hydroacoustics, electronics, materials, software, energy.

SPECZASHCHITA • Hydrorobotics • 2

Classes of underwater robotic systems

AUV

ROV

Gliders

Donut Stations

Hybrids

Autonomous cartography, survey, monitoring Key: payload, communication, energy, navigation, service.

Precise work, inspection, repair, manipulation Key: payload, communication, energy, navigation, service.

Long-term missions and monitoring of large areas Key: payload, communication, energy, navigation, service.

Constant sensors of environment and infrastructure Key: payload, communication, energy, navigation, service.

Autonomous transition + controlled intervention Key: payload, communication, energy, navigation, service.

SPECZASHCHITA • Hydrorobotics • 3

Platform architecture SPECZASHCHITA

Production cooperation + Mission + Digital Data Archive

Data

Digital double of the water area

Project Office

Technical Core

Operation

TK, cooperation, pilot's passport, estimate, customers

AUV/ROV, sensors, communication, AI, materials, testing

Missions, service, training, reports, regulations

Customers

Ports, USC, ecology, safety

SPECZASHCHITA • Hydrorobotics • 4

Technology Stack

What should be collected in a single line

• Housings and buoyancy: composites, titanium, syntactic foam

• Energy: batteries, BMS, charging, cable power supply ROV

• Navigation: INS, DVL, USBL/LBL, Lighthouses, SLAM

• Sensors: sonar, cameras, CTD, water chemistry, magnetometer

• Communication: cable, acoustic modem, buoy, satellite channel

• Manipulators: gripping, sampling, cutting, cleaning, repair

• Software and AI: mission, recognition, 3D-reconstruction, reports

• Service: testing range, operators, spare parts, modernization

SPECZASHCHITA • Hydrorobotics • 5

Connection with shipbuilding

USC — VTB — Inmortrans — Ocean 80 as a practical outline

USC

VTB

SPECZASHCHITA

Inmortrans / Ocean 80

Shipyards, carriers, docks, repairs, ship integration

Financing, leasing, asset control and enforcement

Project office, cooperation, registry, pilots

Regulations, operation, water areas, training

• Result: to create not a one-time device, but a serial service life cycle system for ports, ships and water areas.

SPECZASHCHITA • Hydrorobotics • 6

Materials science for hydrorobotics

Corps

Optics and sensors

Coatings

SKFE

Corrosion resistance, pressure, impact, maintainability

Sapphire, quartz, transparent ceramics, sealed windows

Anti-fouling, protection, wear resistance, stealth/noise

Superpure materials and powders

• Link to the "Materials" package: technical ceramics, synthetic crystals, composites, coatings and ultra-pure materials for electronics and optics.

SPECZASHCHITA • Hydrorobotics • 7

The five starter pilots

1. Port Inspection

2. Ecological water area

3. Shipbuilding service

ROV + Sonar + Video Analytics

AUV/Glider + Substations

Vessels, docks, wheel groups

4. Search and Security

5. Materials and coatings

Examination of the bottom and hazardous objects

Marine Testing of Materials

SPECZASHCHITA • Hydrorobotics • 8

KPI programs

Techniques

Economy

Ecology

Security

Depth Autonomy Positioning Accuracy Mission Success Data Quality

Cost of the mission Service revenue Share of domestic nodes Loading of shipyards Payback period

Monitoring frequency Water coverage Pollution detection speed Observation archive

Search time Risk to people Object control Emergency preparedness

SPECZASHCHITA • Hydrorobotics • 9

Immediate action

From idea to project passport and first field test

• Appoint a head project office and technical integrator.

• Collect the register of competencies: KB, hydroacoustics, electronics, materials, software, shipyards, polygons.

• Choose 2–3 starting water areas: port, shipbuilding facility, ecological landfill.

• Prepare TK at ROV-inspector, AUV-cartographer, glider monitor and bottom station.

• Form a financial scheme: R&D, leasing, service contracts, industrial consortium.

SPECZASHCHITA • Hydrorobotics • 10

Published files

Technology · Full published text

Materials Science: Ceramics and Synthetic Crystals

Source Status: Primary Document

Overview of the directions of materials science related to ceramics, synthetic crystals and their application.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/materialovedenie-keramika-i-sinteticheskie-kristally

Open on the site

ECO-PPA • IMASH RAS • Minigeneration • Ecomodules • Scientific Robotics • 2026

1. New material science framework

Materials science should be fixed as an independent cross-cutting scientific and engineering circuit. At the same time, ceramics are retained as a mandatory basic category, but is supplemented by a full-fledged direction of synthetic crystals of various types, chemical nature and purpose.

Synthetic crystals are crystals grown in laboratory or industrial controlled conditions. Their chemical basis can coincide with the natural mineral, but the production technology allows you to control the purity, composition of impurities, orientation, defect, internal stresses and, consequently, functional properties.

1.1. Mandatory Terminological Formula

CERAMIC + SYNTHETIC CRYSTALS + COMPOSITE + COVER + DIGITAL PASSPORT + VALIDATION

2. Why ceramics and synthetic crystals need to be separated

The same chemical composition can exist in fundamentally different structural states. For example, Al₂O₃ can be polycrystalline technical ceramics or grown corundum monocrystal. Colorless transparent synthetic corundum is usually called leukosapphire. The structure of the material determines anisotropy, transparency, defect, crack resistance, thermal conductivity, electrical and optical properties.

• Ceramics are usually polycrystalline material with grain boundaries.

• A synthetic monocrystal has a continuous crystallographic structure in the working volume.

• Crystals allow the purposeful use of optical, piezoelectric, electro-optical and other properties.

• Ceramics gives scalability, strength, chemical and temperature resistance.

• The most promising products arise in the zone of integration of ceramics and crystals.

3. Basic classes of synthetic crystals

MaterialChemical basisClassKey PropertiesEngineering applications
Synthetic DiamondCCovalent Crystalvery high hardness, thermal conductivity, chemical resistancecutting tool, heat sink, optics, sensorics
Leukosapphire / synthetic corundumAl₂O₃Oxide Single Crystaltransparency, hardness, heat resistance, electrical insulationprotective windows, substrates, sensors, high-temperature elements
FianiteZrO₂, stabilized in cubic phaseOxide Crystalhigh refractive index, optical transparency, hardnessoptical and functional elements
IAG / YAGY₃Al₅O₁₂grenadesoptical stability, legibility, laser propertieslaser media, spectroscopy, lidar
GGG / GGGGd₃Ga₅O₁₂grenadesmagnetooptic and optical properties, substratesphotonics, magneto-optics, sensor systems
Niobath LithiumLiNbO₃Ferroelectric Crystalpiezoelectric, electro-optical and nonlinear-optical propertiessensors, modulators, acoustic optics, photonics
Synthetic QuartzSiO₂Piezoelectric Crystalfrequency stability, piezo effectresonators, metrology, sensors
Silicon CarbideSiCWide-band crystalline materialheat resistance, hardness, thermal conductivity, semiconductor propertiespower electronics, extreme environments, mechanical assemblies

4. Technology of cultivation and production

The functional properties of a synthetic crystal depend not only on the chemical formula, but also on the method of cultivation. It is technology that determines the distribution of impurities, defect, voltage, geometry and a number of special properties.

MethodPrincipleTypical materialsControlled parameters
Chokhralskypulling a single crystal from a melt on the seedsapphire, YAG, etc.orientation, growth rate, doping, diameter
Bridgeman - Stockbargerdirectional crystallization of melt in temperature gradientoxide and semiconductor crystalscrystallization front, temperature gradient
Verneilpowder melting and crystal build-up werecorundum, several oxidesgrowth rate, composition of the original powder
Hydrothermalgrowth from solution at elevated temperature and pressurequartz and some oxidespurity, defect, dimensions
Fluxgrowth from high-temperature solution-luxcomplex oxides, grenadescomposition, doping, growth temperature
HPHThigh pressure and high temperatureSynthetic Diamondgrowth rate, impurity, defect
CVDchemical deposition from the gas phaseDiamond and functional layersthickness, purity, doping, layer structure

5. Managed Properties of Synthetic Crystals

• chemical purity and concentration of alloying additives;

• crystallographic orientation;

• Dislocation density and other defects;

• residual internal stresses;

• optical transparency, absorption and scattering;

• piezoelectric and electro-optical coefficients;

• thermal conductivity and coefficient of thermal expansion;

• radiation, chemical and temperature resistance;

• surface structure after mechanical, laser and chemical treatment.

6. Unified classification of project materials

ClassRole
Metals and alloyssupport structures, conductivity, plasticity, manufacturability
Technical ceramicsinsulation, wear resistance, chemical and temperature resistance
Synthetic Crystalsoptics, piezoelectricity, photonics, sensorics, heat sink
Polymers and elastomerssealing, flexibility, electrical insulation, light construction
CompositesCombination of properties of several phases and mass reduction
Coatingsbarrier, antifriction, optical, catalytic and protective functions
Functional materialselectrical, magnetic, optical, catalytic and sensory functions
Hybrid crystal-ceramic systemssimultaneous carrier, protective and intelligent function

7. Crystal Ceramic Intelligent Nodes

As a promising engineering class, it is proposed to fix the concept of "crystal ceramic intelligent node" - an element of a machine, sensor complex or ecomodule in which the ceramic part performs a load-bearing, protective or heat-resistant function, and the synthetic crystal - a measuring, optical, piezoelectric, photonic or heat-discharge function.

• Sapphire Window + Ceramic Housing + Optical Sensor;

• LiNbO₃- Piezoelement + Ceramic Power Unit for Vibration Diagnostics;

• diamond heat sink + SiC-ceramic + Power Converter;

• YAG-crystal + Ceramic Housing Compact Lidar;

• Quartz Resonator + Ceramic Insulator Metrology Node.

8. Application in ECO-PPA

Minigeneration

SiC/GaN power electronics, ceramic insulators, diamond heat sinks, resistant assemblies and coatings.

Eco-modules

ceramic and sapphire components for pumps, valves, membrane systems, optical windows and chemical resistant sensors.

Biocenous monitoring

quartz and LiNbO₃ resonators, sapphire windows, photonic and spectroscopic elements.

Scientific Robotics

Wear-resistant friction pairs, piezo drives, optics, power electronics, sensors and protective elements.

Validation Tools

reference optical elements, stable resonators, calibration units, stable sensors.

9. Application in IMASH RAN

• mechanics of destruction of single crystals and crystal-ceramic composites;

• tribology of ceramic-crystalline pairs;

• dynamics and vibroacoustics of piezoelectric crystals;

• digital twins of growth, processing and operation processes;

• study of high-temperature and chemically stable nodes;

• robotic diagnostics of defects and orientation of crystals;

• V&V mechanical, thermal and functional characteristics.

10. Materials Validation Tools

LevelWhat is being checkedToolsResult
Chemicalcomposition, impurities, dopingspectroscopy, mass spectrometry, chemical analysisPassport of composition
Structuralphases, orientation, defectsX-ray diffraction, microscopy, topographyStructure map
Opticaltransparency, absorption, scatteringspectrophotometry, interferometryOptical Passport
Mechanicalhardness, strength, crack resistanceIndentation, Testing Machinesmechanical passport
Heatthermal conductivity, expansion, heat resistancethermal analysis, dilatometry, laser flashThermal passport
Functionalpiezo-, electro-, optical propertiesSpecialized StandsFunctional passport
OperatingResource and degradationCyclical and Accelerated TestsLimits of applicability

11. Digital Material Passport

• name and chemical formula;

• method of production or cultivation;

• batch, primer and sample ID;

• crystallographic orientation;

• composition and doping;

• modes of growth, sintering and heat treatment;

• map of defects and internal stresses;

• mechanical, thermal, electrical and optical properties;

• machining, coatings and connections;

• test results and independent validation status;

• binding to a product, eco-module, robot or measuring device.

12. Self-adjusting materials science

Within a self-validating natural engineering system, each critical material must have a digital history related to the actual operating conditions. Thus, the material ceases to be a string in the specification and becomes an observed life cycle object.

RECEIVED → CHARACTERIZATION → PRODUCTION → EXPLOITATION → DIAGNOSTICS → VALIDATION → CORRECTION

13. New directions of inventions

• crystal-ceramic self-diagnosable mechanical assembly;

• sensor node with synthetic crystal and built-in digital passport;

• optical biocenose sensor with sapphire protective window;

• energy module with ceramic protection and synthetic diamond heat sink;

• Piezoelectric Node Based LiNbO₃ to diagnose the condition of the robot or ecomodule;

• robotic system of automatic validation of crystal defects;

• is a method of adaptive material selection according to the digital twin data and actual degradation.

14. Uniform text for all future submissions

15. Working Dictionary

TermWorking definition
Synthetic Crystalcrystal grown in artificially created and controlled conditions.
Leukosapphirecolorless transparent synthetic corundum Al₂O₃.
IAG / YAGYttrium-aluminum grenade Y₃Al₅O₁₂.
GGG / GGGgadolinium gallium grenade Gd₃Ga₅O₁₂.
Niobath LithiumLiNbO₃; piezo-, electro-optical and nonlinear-optical crystal.
Fianiteartificial crystalline material based on the cubic phase of zirconium dioxide.
Crystal Ceramic KnotA hybrid element that combines structural ceramics and functional crystal.
Digital Material Passportstructured record of origin, technology, structure, properties, testing and resource.

16. Source base for further development

The source materials for the concept include publications and reference materials: "Science and Life" (nkj.ru), resources of the Department of Crystallography and Crystal Chemistry of Moscow State University (cryst.geol.msu.ru), GeoKniga (geokniga.org), Gem Center (gem-center.ru), as well as other educational and industry sources. When preparing a patent, regulatory or scientific version of the document, specific properties and methods must be confirmed by primary scientific publications, standards and technical documentation.

17. Result

CERAMIC IS SAVED AS A MANDATORY CONTOUR. SYNTHETIC CRYSTALS ARE IMPLEMENTED AS A SECOND EQUAL CONTOUR.

This approach expands materials science from design solutions to functional, sensory, photonic, energy and intelligent materials and directly connects it with ECO-PPA, scientific robotics, minigeneration, bio-censorship monitoring and a self-validating natural-technical system.

Other published edition: MATERIALS OF CERAMIC + SYNTHETIC CRYSTAL COMPOSITES • Coating • Functional Materials • digital passport • Validation of ECO-PPA • IMASH RAS • Scientific Robotics • Minigeneration • 2026 MATERIALS_ceramics_and_synthetic_crystals.pptx · Web Text +

01 / STRATEGIC MODEL

New material science framework

Ceramics

Synthetic Crystals

Mandatory basic contour. Polycrystalline materials for load-bearing, protective, insulating, wear-resistant and heat-resistant functions.

The second equal. Laboratory-grown crystals with controlled purity, orientation, doping, defect and functional properties.

02 / BASIC FORMULA

Material as a system of parameters

Composition

Structure

Technology of obtaining

Properties

Resource

Digital passport

Validation

The property of the material is determined not only by the chemical formula, but also by how the material was grown, baked, processed and tested.

03 / STRUCTURE

Why ceramics and crystal are not the same

The same chemistry

Different structure

Different properties

Al₂O₃ can be technical ceramics or grown corundum single crystal.

Ceramics are grain boundaries; a single crystal is a continuous crystal lattice.

Transparency, anisotropy, defect, optics, piezo effect, thermal conductivity and resource.

04 / MATERIALS

Basic classes of synthetic crystals

Synthetic Diamond

Leukosapphire

Fianite

IAG / YAG

C hardness • heat sink • sensorics

Al₂O₃ transparency • temperature resistance • insulation

cubic ZrO₂ optical functions • hardness

Y₃Al₅O₁₂ Laser environment • spectroscopy

GGG / GGG

Niobath Lithium

Synthetic Quartz

Silicon Carbide

Gd₃Ga₅O₁₂ Photonics • Magnetooptics

LiNbO₃ piezoelectric effect • electrooptics

SiO₂ resonators • metrology

SiC heat resistance • power electronics

05 / TECHNOLOGIES

Methods of cultivation and synthesis

Chokhralsky

Bridgeman

Verneil

Hydrothermal

Pulling out of the melt

directional crystallization

growth from molten powder

Growth from solution under pressure

Flux

HPHT

CVD

growth from high-temperature solution

Diamond: High P and T

Deposition from the gas phase

06 / PROPERTIES

What can be managed

Chemical purity

Legging

Crystallographic Orientation

Defectivity

Internal voltages

Optical transparency

Piezoelectric properties

Thermal conductivity

Radiation resistance

Surface condition

07 / MATERIAL SYSTEM

Unified classification of project materials

Metals and alloys

Technical ceramics

Synthetic Crystals

Polymers

Carrying function and conductivity

insulation, wear, chemical resistance

optics, photonics, sensors

sealing, flexibility, lightness

Composites

Coatings

Functional materials

Hybrid Crystal-Ceramic

Combination of properties and mass reduction

barrier, antifriction, optical

magnetic, catalytic, sensory

Bearing + Intelligent Function

08 / NEW ENGINEERING CLASS

Crystal Ceramic Intelligent Node

Ceramics

Coverage

Bearing / Protective

Surface / Barrier

CRYSTAL CERAMIC KNOE

Crystal

Electronics

Sensor / Optics

Communication / Processing

09 / APPLICATION

Materials in ECO-PPA

Minigeneration

Eco-modules

Biotic communities

Robotics

Validation

SiC/GaN Electronics • diamond heat sink • Ceramic Insulators

Wear-Resistant Pump Units • chemical resistant elements • Sapphire Windows

Quartz • LiNbO₃ • Photonic and Spectroscopic Elements

Friction pairs • Optics • Piezodrives • Protective elements

Reference elements • Resonators • Calibration units

10 / SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING NUCLEAR

Materials Science in IMASH RAS

• mechanics of destruction of single crystals and crystal-ceramic composites;

• tribology of ceramic-crystalline pairs;

• dynamics and vibroacoustics of piezoelectric materials;

• digital twins of growth, processing and operation of materials;

• robotic diagnostics of defects and orientation of crystals;

• V&V mechanical, thermal and functional characteristics.

11 / Credibility

Materials Validation Tools

Chemical

Structural

Optical

Mechanical

Composition • impurity • doping

Phase • orientation • defects

transparency • absorption • scattering

hardness • strength • crack resistance

Heat

Functional

Operating

thermal conductivity • expansion

piezo- • electro- • optical parameters

Resource • Degradation • Limits of applicability

12 / LIFE CYCLE

Digital Material Passport

Chemical formula

Method of obtaining

Party / sample / seeding

Orientation

Legging

Modes of growth and heat treatment

Defects map

Mechanical and thermal properties

Optical and electrical properties

Coatings and processing

Tests

Validation status

13 / NEW APPROACH

Self-adjusting materials science

Receipt

Characterization

Manufacturing

Operation

Diagnostics

Validation

Correction

Critical material becomes an observable lifecycle object, not a string in the specification.

14 / PATENT LINE

New directions of inventions

Self-diagnosed node

Sapphire Biocenous Sensor

Thermostable power module

Crystal + Ceramics + Sensory

optics + protection + digital passport

diamond heat sink + ceramic

LiNbO₃-diagnosis

Robotic Crystal Control

Adaptive material selection

piezo node for robots and ecomodules

defects + orientation + automatic V&V

Digital Double + Actual Degradation

15 / STANDARD

Uniform wording for all new materials

Material history outline

“The material science contour includes technical and functional ceramics, synthetic crystals of different chemical nature and growing methods, metal, polymer and composite materials, coatings, crystal ceramic and hybrid structures. For critical materials, a digital passport of origin, composition, structure, technology of obtaining, properties, defects, resource and results of independent validation is formed.

CERAMIC is preserved. SYNTHETIC CRYSTALS WILL BE THE SECOND EQUAL CONTOUR. Materials science expands from design to function, sensorics, photonics, energy and intelligent nodes.

Other published edition: MATERIALS New industrial platform of ultrapure materials Materials Science_SKFE_ceramics_synthetic_crystals.docx · Web Text +

Supercritical metallurgy · technical ceramics · synthetic crystals

The basis: provided material "A fundamentally new industry: proven supercritical metallurgy". The document expands the original concept to a single material science system, preserving SCF as a mandatory technological circuit and adding ceramics and synthetic crystals as independent product directions.

Project format for scientific, technological, industrial and state study

1. Strategic Design

The source material suggests the formation of a new industry based on supercritical fluid extraction (SCF): the use of supercritical media for the selective extraction of components, accelerated mass transfer and the subsequent production of pure and ultrapure substances. Microelectronics, optics, mining and metallurgical industries, medicine and dual-use areas are named as key applications.

For the development of the idea, it is advisable to consider SKFE not as an isolated technology, but as one of the basic alterations of a single material science platform. Such a platform links raw materials and man-made resources, deep separation and purification, synthesis of powders and precursors, cultivation of synthetic crystals, production of technical ceramics and functional materials, as well as metrology, testing and digital material passports.

The key result is the transition from the sale of raw materials or intermediate concentrate to the release of materials with a given purity, phase composition, structure, defect and functional properties. This creates a longer value chain and forms technological sovereignty in critical materials.

Scientific reservation. SCFE, hydrothermal synthesis, crystal-growing and ceramic production are different technological classes. They should be combined at the level of the industry platform and commodity/product chains, but not mixed as one physico-chemical process.

2. Basic contour: supercritical media and SCF

A supercritical fluid is a state of matter above critical temperature and pressure in which the normal boundary between the liquid and gas phases disappears. For technological tasks, a combination of high density, relatively low viscosity, increased diffusion capacity and adjustable solubility is important.

In the material provided, supercritical water and supercritical carbon dioxide are highlighted. It is indicated that the change in pressure, temperature and composition of the medium allows you to control solubility and selectivity, and the transfer of the system below the critical area can be used to isolate dissolved solid components.

The original document also links supercritical water environments with hydrothermal technologies, where substances that are weakly soluble in ordinary water are dissolved under special conditions, and examples of synthesis / cultivation are given SiO₂, GeO₂, ZnO, AlPO₄, Al₂O₃ GaN.

Technological advantages formulated in the source material:

  • high penetration capacity and effective mass transfer;
  • adjustable solubility and selective separation capability;
  • reducing the time of a number of extraction operations;
  • relatively simple separation of the fluid and the allocated fraction when changing parameters;
  • possibility of multistage "passes" with different fluids and modifiers.

Verification of allegations. Numerical estimates of the GaN market in Russia, stated in the original document, as well as the parameters of specific Russian reactors here were not confirmed by external sources and should be considered as initial design approvals before separate verification.

3. Map of the new material science industry

ContourMaterials / ProductsKey parametersMain consumers
Superpure substancesoxides, salts, metals, precursors6N+ purity, impurities, isotopic/element compositionmicroelectronics, optics, chemistry
Technical ceramicsAl₂O₃, ZrO₂, SiC, Si₃N₄, AlN and compositesdensity, porosity, grain size, thermal conductivity, strengthelectronics, energy, transport, medicine
Synthetic CrystalsLeukosapphire, YAG, GGG, bianite, quartz, GaN, ZnOdefect, orientation, optical and electrical propertieslasers, microwave, power electronics, optics
Powders and nanomaterialsoxide, nitride, carbide powdersgranulometry, specific surface, purity, agglomerationadditive technologies, coatings, ceramics
Functional coatingsprotective, optical, conductive, dielectricthickness, adhesion, defects, durabilityengineering, instrumentation, space

3.1. The principle of a single material passport

  • the source and origin of the party;
  • chemical and elemental purity;
  • phase composition and crystallography;
  • microstructure, porosity, defects and inclusions;
  • mechanical, thermal, electrical, optical and chemical properties;
  • technological history of the batch and processing modes;
  • measurement methods, uncertainty, laboratory and protocols;
  • traceability from raw materials to the final product.

4. Synthetic crystals as a separate product contour

Synthetic crystals are crystalline materials grown in controlled laboratory or industrial conditions. Their chemical basis may coincide with the natural mineral, but the industrial value is determined not by origin, but by the controlled purity, defect, geometry, orientation and functional characteristics.

MaterialChemical basisTypical FunctionsConnection to the platform
Synthetic DiamondCheat sink, optics, cutting material, electronicsultrapure starting materials, gas phase/HPHT synthesis
LeukosapphireAl₂O₃optical windows, substrates, protective elementsHigh Purity Al₂O₃ → crystalgrowing
IAG / YAGY₃Al₅O₁₂Laser and optical materialspure oxides Y and Al → growing/laying
GGG / GGGGd₃Ga₅O₁₂magnetooptics, substratesPure Compounds Gd/Ga → Crystallization
FianiteZrO₂, stabilized Y₂O₃optics, jewelry and technical applicationspure Zr/Y precursors → melting/crystallization
QuartzSiO₂frequency elements, opticsHydrothermal cultivation of high purity SiO₂
GaNGaNpower and microwave electronics, optoelectronicsPure Precursors + Specialized Growth Methods
ZnOZnOoptics, piezoelectrics, sensorsHydrothermal/other controlled growth

Important: not all these crystals are rational to grow in a supercritical environment. The role of SKFE in the overall architecture can be primarily in deep cleaning of raw materials and obtaining high-purity precursors, while the growth of the crystal itself is performed by hydrothermal, Chokhralsky, Stepanov, zone melting, HPHT/CVD or by another method - on material and TK.

5. Technical ceramics: mandatory second contour

Ceramics should not be considered as a by-product of metallurgy, but as an independent class of structural and functional materials. For many applications, not only chemical purity but also powder quality, granulometry, molding, sintering, phase transformations and porosity control are crucial.

Oxide ceramics: Al₂O₃, ZrO₂ and their compositions: electrical insulation, wear resistance, biocompatible and high temperature units.

Nitride ceramics: AlN and Si₃N₄: heat conductive substrates, electrical insulation, heat-resistant and strength parts.

Carbide ceramics: SiC and other carbides: high hardness, chemical and temperature resistance, power and structural applications.

Transparent ceramics: polycrystalline optical materials with high density and controlled microstructure; compete and complement single crystals in terms of optical tasks.

Ceramic composites: materials with a combination of matrices and reinforcing phases to control fracture resistance, temperature resource and mass.

6. End-to-end technological chain

1. Raw materials - ores, concentrates, metallurgical dumps, man-made waste, secondary materials; chemical and mineralogical passport.

2. Pre-preparation - Crushing, classification, leaching/enrichment, if necessary, transfer of target components to the recoverable form.

3. Supercritical separation - Selection of fluid, modifiers, pressure, temperature, and sequence of stages for selective extraction.

4. Cleaning and precursors - Obtaining high-purity compounds, controlling residual impurities, transferring to a given chemical form.

5. Forming material - Crystal-growing, powder synthesis, sintering of ceramics, coating coating, obtaining composites.

6. Post-processing - Cutting, grinding, polishing, annealing, doping, heat treatment, cleaning.

7. Validation - Chemical analysis, X-ray phase and structural analysis, microscopy, mechanical/optical/electrical tests.

8. Digital passport — Traceability of batches, technological modes, test reports, scope of permissible application.

7. Center of Competences for Ultrapure Materials

The original document proposes the creation of a Competence Center for SK-technologies in the mining sector. In the extended model, the center becomes an inter-industry infrastructure combining SCF, high-purity materials, ceramics and synthetic crystals.

  • SCF reactor site and hydrothermal processes;
  • analytical center of ultra-low concentrations of impurities;
  • the site of obtaining high-purity oxides, salts and metal precursors;
  • laboratory of powders and ceramic technologies;
  • the area of cultivation of synthetic crystals and post-processing;
  • Center for testing and validation of properties;
  • digital register of materials, recipes, modes and batches;
  • Pilot line scaling "laboratory → pilot production → series";
  • engineering school on high pressure, equipment materials, safety and automation.

8. Pilot product programs

PilotTarget productSign inKey redistributionResult criterion
P16N Al₂O₃ / PrecursorAluminum-containing raw materialsSeparation + deep cleaningstable impurity profile and reproducibility
P2Leukosapphire6N Al₂O₃crystalgrowing + annealingoptical homogeneity and low defect
P3Al₂O₃-ceramicsHigh Purity Powderpowder preparation + sinteringdensity, strength, dielectric properties
P4YAG / GGGPure oxides Y/Gd/Ga/AlChip Synthesis + Crystal Growthoptical parameters and uniformity of doping
P5Ga/GaN-contourGallium-containing raw materialsextraction/cleaning + specialized growthElectronic purity and crystal quality
P6Extraction from dumpsTechnogenic raw materialsSelective SCFextraction of target element + tailings economy

9. System of indicators

  • purity: mass fraction of the main substance and profile of critical impurities;
  • output of the target component and selectivity of separation;
  • specific energy consumption and consumption of fluid/reagents;
  • reactor performance and equipment utilization factor;
  • Quality stability from party to party;
  • for ceramics: density, porosity, grain, strength, thermal conductivity, electrical properties;
  • for crystals: dislocation, inclusion, optical uniformity, orientation, specific resistance and other profile parameters;
  • share of domestic materials and equipment in critical chains;
  • scaling time from laboratory sample to qualified series;
  • A full life cycle economy, including the return of secondary resources.

10. Road map 2026–2032

StageTimeframeContentsResult
I. Verification0–6 monthsaudit of source reactors, raw materials, analytics, economics; reproducibility of experimentsTechnology passport and list of priority products
II. Pilot6–18 months2–3 target materials; trial batches; independent analyticsconfirmed specifications and technical and economic model
III. Demonstration18–36 monthssemi-industrial line,continuity,safety,fluid cleaningdemonstration capacity and qualification by consumers
IV. Series3–5 yearsproduction lines for selected materials, contracting raw materials and salesSustainable production of critical materials
V. Network5–6 yearsregional nodes on raw materials and technogenic basesthe National Network of Material Science Centers

11. Critical risks and conditions of industrial viability

Equipment materials science: High pressure/temperature and corrosive environments impose stringent requirements on reactor materials, seals, rebar and corrosion control.

Scaling: The result of laboratory extraction does not guarantee the economy of a continuous industrial process; data on mass transfer, cycles, regeneration and durability are necessary.

Purity: For microelectronics, it is not the abstract “superpurity” that is important, but the specific profile of impurities. Analytics should be comparable to the requirements of the end user.

Crystals and ceramics: A high-purity precursor is a necessary but insufficient condition. The quality of the final material is determined by a separate growth/sintering and post-processing technology.

Economy: Comparison with existing hydrometallurgical, pyrometallurgical, zone-floating, chemical and crystal-growing routes at full cost is required.

Safety: SC systems are high-risk equipment. Industrial safety, HAZOP/similar hazard analysis, automated locks and emergency discharge scenarios are needed.

12. Proposed organizational model

  • Scientific and Technological Council - priorities of materials, methods and independent examination;
  • Engineering center - reactors, scaling, automation and safety;
  • Center of materials - powders, ceramics, crystals, coatings and composites;
  • Center for Metrology and Validation - standard samples, interlaboratory comparisons, digital passports;
  • Industrial product consortia — commodity companies + Material Manufacturers + End Users;
  • Piloting fund — financing of pilot batches with the transition to contracts when reaching KPI.

13. Final formula

CHEESE → SELECTIVE DIVISION → SURFACE PRECURSORS → CERAMIC / CRYSTALS / FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS → PRODUCT

The proposed industry is not only “supercritical metallurgy”, but integrated material science of the full cycle. The SCFE is central to it as a separation and purification tool where it confirms a technological and economic advantage. Ceramics and synthetic crystals form two mandatory high-tech circuits that convert ultrapure substances into materials with specified functions and high added value.

Annex. Provisions directly derived from the source material

  • SCF combines the properties of a dense liquid and a highly mobile gas environment and can be used as an adjustable extractor.
  • Changes in temperature and pressure allow changing solubility and selectivity; sequential modes of fractional isolation are possible.
  • SCFE is considered as the basis for selective isolation of metal complexes and the production of clean / ultra-clean materials.
  • Hydrothermal processes in special autoclaves are applicable to a number of oxides and other compounds; the source is given SiO₂, GeO₂, ZnO, AlPO₄, Al₂O₃ GaN.
  • It is proposed to create a Competence Center for SK-technologies on the raw material base of mining enterprises and / or metallurgical dumps.
  • The source document states the presence of a reactor plant developed in the Russian Federation and the work carried out on the aluminum group; this information requires separate documentary confirmation when preparing an official investment / government package.

Source of the basis: user document "New industry SKFE metallurgy.docx", 3 pages. This document is a structured and extended development of this concept; the added sections on ceramics, synthetic crystals, KPI and the roadmap are a project extension, not a literal content of the source.

Published files

Industry · Full published text

Shipbuilding: USC, VTB, Inmortrans and OCEAN 80

Source Status: Primary Document

A strategic document on an integrated shipbuilding system, from materials and design to series production, operation, repair and disposal.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/sudostroenie-osk-vtb-inmortrans-okean-80

Open on the site

Project of architecture of industrial-financial and scientific-technological contour

USC Industrial CoreVTB Financial and Management OutlineInmortrans Engineering - Scientific OutlineOcean 80 Pilot/operational circuit

Working strategy paper • 30 August 2026

1. Design

It is proposed to form a single shipbuilding circuit around SPECZASHCHITA, which connects industrial production, financial recovery and investment, scientific and engineering expertise, new materials, the ship's digital life cycle and pilot operation.

Goal

To move from disparate projects to a managed portfolio of ships, technologies and production facilities - from idea and material to serial construction, service, repair, modernization and recycling.

Role SPECZASHCHITA

The organizer of cooperation: forms consortia, project passports, a register of technologies and suppliers, validation contours, pilots and a scaling mechanism.

Key principle

Do not replace USC, VTB or specialized institutions, but create a project layer between them, in which the technical solution, money, order, production capacity and operational need are visible in one balance.

2. Reference institutional framework

ParticipantConfirmed frameProposed function in contour
USCThe largest state shipbuilding holding; enterprises build civil and special vessels, conduct ship repair and develop composite technologies.Industrial core, shipyards, KB, seriality, standardization of production platforms.
VTB100% USC shares transferred to VTB Bank in trust management 5 the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation753 from 09.10.2023 the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation94From 19.01.2024.Financial model, investment control, project financing, restructuring and KPI.
InmortransOpen sources confirm SNPS of maritime transport "Inmortrans" (St. Petersburg) and its historical connection with maritime transport. The current organizational role needs to be legally and effectively verified.Engineering and scientific expertise, regulatory and technical documentation, testing, modeling of transport systems - after verification of status and competencies.
Ocean 80The name requires the fixation of a specific legal entity / project. The document is used as the working name of the participant specified by the initiator.Pilot operation, operational customer / project office, naval and marine scenarios - after confirmation of the profile.

3. Architecture "SPECZASHCHITA - Shipbuilding"

  1. 1. Portfolio of orders: The needs of the state, cargo owners, regions, ports, the Arctic, the river and the sea fleet; ranking by economy and criticality.
  2. 2. Product Platforms: Unification of hulls, power, propulsion, electronics, ship systems and digital components; seriality instead of single solutions.
  3. 3. Materials science: ship steels and alloys, aluminum and titanium systems, composites, technical ceramics, synthetic crystals, ultra-pure materials, protective coatings.
  4. 4. Shipyards and production chains: USC and partners capacities, loading workshops, bottlenecks, robotization, modular assembly, domestic machine and welding equipment.
  5. 5. Financial Outline: CAPEX/OPEX, Life cycle cost, leasing, project financing, guarantees, factoring, off-take and portfolio risk management.
  6. 6. Digital twin: Digital ship passport, traceability of materials and components, configuration management, maintenance as of.
  7. 7. Testing and validation: Classification requirements, resource testing, climate and corrosion regimes, metrology, certification, evidence base.
  8. 8. Operation and service: Service centers, spare parts, repair, modernization, crew training, feedback to the design and production circuit.

4. Materials science as a cross-cutting technological module

Materials science should be allocated to an independent competence center within the shipbuilding circuit. This links the previously worked out directions SPECZASHCHITA - supercritical metallurgy/SKFE, ceramics and synthetic crystals - with the specific tasks of the fleet.

Material classApplicationEffectPilot
Corrosion-resistant steels and alloysHousings, pipelines, fittings, heat exchangersResource, maintainability, reduction of corrosion lossesComparative coupons + digital corrosion passport
CompositesSuperstructures, hulls, masts, fairingsMass reduction, corrosion resistance, radio transparencyLinkage with the Competences of the Middle Nevsky GCC
Technical ceramicsBearings, seals, insulators, heat protection, touch elementsWear resistance, chemical resistance, high temperaturesStand of ship's friction and sealing units
Synthetic CrystalsOptics, lasers, sensors, gyroscopy, electronics, power devicesStability, purity, high temperature and radiation resistanceLeucosapphire/YAG/GaN .
Superpure materials / SCFElectronics, coatings, catalysis, special alloysLocalization of critical materials and managed cleanlinessPilot for receiving/cleaning target fraction for ship component base

5. Nine priority programmes

1. River-sea platform - Serial dry cargo ships, tankers, tugs and service fleet on a unified basis.

2. Arctic contour - Ice classes, supply, rescue, hydrography, autonomous complexes and resource materials.

3. Passenger and high-speed fleet - Catamarans, electric vessels, hybrid power plants, regional mobility.

4. Port and technical fleet - Dredging, rescue, fire, environmental and towing vessels.

5. Underwater Robotics — AUV/ROV, inspection of pipelines and buildings, search, monitoring of biocenoses and infrastructure.

6. Shipbuilding engineering - Engines, gearboxes, engines, pumps, compressors, valves and power engineering.

7. Marine electronics - Navigation, communication, sensors, automation, cyber defense, power electronics.

8. Service 40+ years - Repair cycles, predictive maintenance, reverse design and modernization of the fleet.

9. Green Shipyard and Circularity - Accounting for materials, waste, emissions, metal recovery and ship recycling.

6. Management model

LevelSPECZASHCHITAUSCVTBInmortrans / Ocean 80
StrategyPortfolio and cooperationIndustrial policy of the groupFinancial discipline and investmentExpertise / operational request
ProjectPassport, schedule, risksKB + Shipyard + completeFin model and stage controlTK, Tests, Feedback
DataUnified Register and BalanceProduction dataFinancial indicatorsScientific and operational data
ResultScalingSerial productPayback/sustainabilityProven effectiveness

7. Balance system and KPI

  • Portfolio of orders: rubles, number of vessels, coverage of production capacities
  • Construction period: months from contract to delivery, deviation from schedule
  • Cost: RUB/ship, share of repeated decisions, labor intensity
  • Localization: share of domestic critical components and materials
  • Productivity: normal hours/tons, release at the key workshop/stage
  • Quality: defects, alterations, warranty cases
  • Life cycle: cost of ownership, ship availability, repair time
  • Materials: resource, corrosion, wear, mass, proportion of materials with a digital passport
  • Energy: specific fuel/energy consumption, power plant efficiency
  • Finance: NPV/IRR, DSCR, working capital, overdue, financing cost
  • Personnel: lack of competence, productivity, training of specialists
  • Ecology: waste, emissions, leakage, recycling and reuse of materials

8. Road map 0–36 months

0–90 days - Verification of participants and credentials; register of current projects; selection of 3 pilots; inventory of materials science and critical component base; agreement on the project office.

3–6 months — Technical and financial audit of pilots; unified project passports; digital capacity model; laboratory-stand tests of new materials and coatings.

6–12 months — Contraction of the first stage; launch of the digital passport of the vessel; industrial pilot on materials; formation of the service and leasing contour.

12–24 months - Serial unification; launch of the center of competence of marine materials science; scaling at 2–3 shipyards and supply chains.

24–36 months — Portfolio model at the industry level; export / interregional projects; integration of life cycle data; second cycle of technological modernization.

9. Three Pilots to Launch

Pilot A. Serial civil vessel

  • to choose the demanded class of "river -sea" or technical fleet;
  • to unify 60–70% systems and components;
  • consider the economy not only of construction, but also of 20–30-year life cycle;

Pilot B. Materials and coatings

  • choose 3–5 nodes with a high cost of failure / repair;
  • compare traditional and new materials in the same modes;
  • fix the resource, cost, maintainability and localization;

Pilot C. Digital Fleet Service

  • digital passport of the body, mechanisms and critical parts;
  • status monitoring + repair forecast;
  • closing of operation data back to KB and to the shipyard.

10. Action to be taken

Sources and reservations

External facts in the document are given from open sources. The working roles of SPECZASHCHITA, Inmortrans and Ocean 80 are a project proposal, not a statement of existing arrangements. Before official use, it is necessary to conduct legal and organizational verification of participants.

Decree of the President of the Russian Federation753 from 09.10.2023 / Transmission 100% the USC in VTB Trust Management 5 years — https://rg.ru/2023/10/09/putin-utverdil-peredachu-100-osk-v-doveritelnoe-upravlenie-vtb.html

Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 94-r of 19.01.2024 — trust management terms — https://portnews.ru/upload/basefiles/3186_0001202401230020.pdf

The Government of the Russian Federation — creation of the National Research Center for Shipbuilding, order No777-r from 08.04.2026 — https://government.ru/department/54/

Sredne-Nevsky Shipyard — Composite Shipbuilding and Projects 2026 — https://snsz.ru/

Inmortrans — open court/registry information requiring additional verification — https://sudact.ru/arbitral/doc/zVEjeiv80aJO/

Other published edition: SPECZASHCHITA SPECSAIT_Shipbuilding_USC_VTB_Inmortrans_Ocean80.pptx · Web Text +

SHIPPING • USC • VTB INMORTRANS • OCEAN 80

Architecture of industrial-financial and scientific-technological contour

USC

VTB

Inmortrans

Ocean 80

Industrial Core

Financial Outline

Engineering and Scientific

Pilot/operational

Project layer: order → Technology → financing → Shipyard → Operation → Data

1. Task: to assemble a single system

Not a new organization "instead" of the industry, but a project layer between existing responsibility centers

Issue addressed

Decision

Role SPECZASHCHITA

Order, money, shipyard, KB, materials, components and operation often live in different decision-making cycles.

A single portfolio of projects with a common system of KPI, passports, risks, technological readiness and life cycle.

Consortiums, the register of technologies and suppliers, validation, pilots and scaling — without replacing USC, VTB and specialized institutions.

Key principle

Technical solution + money + production capacity + order + operational need should be visible in one balance.

2. Institutional framework

Confirmed facts are separated from the proposed project roles

USC

VTB

Inmortrans

Ocean 80

The largest state shipbuilding holding.

Proposed role: shipyards, KB, seriality, production platforms, ship repair.

100% USC shares transferred to VTB in trust management 5 years (Decree No753; Order No94Gyr).

Role: financial model, investment control, KPI.

Open sources confirm the SNPS of maritime transport "Inmortrans". Current status and competencies require verification.

Proposed role: engineering expertise and testing.

The working name of the participant specified by the initiator. The legal/draft needs to be clarified.

Proposed role: pilot operation and operational customer.

3. Architecture of the Shipbuilding Outline

Eight interrelated modules - from demand to service

Portfolio of orders

Product Platforms

Materials Science

Shipyards and chains

Finance

Digital twin

Tests

Service

A single end-to-end control object - the life cycle of the vessel and its technological platform

4. Materials Science — a separate competence center

Link metallurgy, composites, ceramics, synthetic crystals and ultra-pure materials to fleet tasks

Steel and alloys

Corps • Pipelines • Heat Exchangers

Resource / Corrosion

Composites

Small Ship Corps • Superstructures • Masts

mass / corrosion resistance

Technical ceramics

Bearings • Seals • Insulators

wear/temperature

Synthetic Crystals

Optics • Lasers • Sensors • Power Electronics

Purity / Stability

SCFE / Ultrapure

Electronics • Coating • Special Alloys

Localization of critical materials

Pilot: 3–5 Critical Vessel Hubs → the same test regimes → comparison of resource, cost and localization

5. Nine priority programmes

Platform "River-sea"

Arctic Contour

Passenger and high-speed fleet

Port and technical fleet

Underwater Robotics

Shipbuilding Engineering

Marine Electronics

Service 40+ years

Green Shipyard and Circularity

6. Management model

Functions are separated - result is common

SPECZASHCHITA

USC

VTB

Inmortrans

Ocean 80

Portfolio

Cooperation

Register

Risks

CB + Shipyard

Complete set

Seriality

Service

Finmodel

Stage Control

Investments

KPI

TK

Expertise

Tests

Modelling

Operational request

Pilot

Feedback

Overall result: + series product sustainable funding + proven efficiency

7. Balance system and KPI

Not only the delivery of the ship, but the economy and reliability of the entire life cycle

Orders

Timeframe

Cost

Localization

portfolio / download

Contract →

rub./ship

Critical Components

Quality

Life Cycle

Materials

Energy

defects / alterations

cost of ownership

Resource / Corrosion

Specific expenditure

Finance

Workforce

Ecology

Data

NPV / IRR / DSCR

Deficit / Productivity

Waste/emissions

digital passport

8. Road map 0–36 months

0–90 days

3–6 months

6–12 months

12–24 months

24–36 months

verification of participants

3 Pilot

Project Registry

Audit

Passports Projects

bench tests

Contraction

digital passport

Industrial Pilot

Serial Unification

the Materials Science Center

2–3 Shipyards

Industry Portfolio

Scaling

2th cycle of modernization

9. Three Pilots to Launch

Pilots must prove seriality, technology and economics at the same time

A. Serial civil vessel

B. Materials and coatings

C. Digital Fleet Service

• in demand class "river-sea" or technical fleet

• 60–70% Unified Systems

• economy 20–30-year life cycle

• 3–5 nodes with high failure cost

• Comparison of traditional and new materials

• resource + cost + Localization

• digital passport of the body and mechanisms

• status monitoring + forecast repair

• operation data back to KB and to shipyard

10. Proposed action

Create an inter-organization project office "SPECZASHCHITA - Shipbuilding"

  • Approve the matrix of roles of USC — VTB — SPECZASHCHITA — scientific and engineering — operational contour
  • For 90 days to prepare 3 Pilot with Feasibility Study, KPI, Risk Map and Localization Plan
  • A separate decision to create a Center for Ship Material Science and Validation
  • After legal verification, determine the formats of participation of Inmortrans and "Ocean 80"

Sources and status of data

Facts - open sources; roles of participants - project proposal

Verified

  • Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 753 of 09.10.2023: 100% shares of USC - VTB Trust Management for 5 years
  • Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No94-r from 19.01.2024: conditions of trust management
  • In 2026, the Government approved the establishment of the National Shipbuilding Research Center.
  • Sredne-Nevsky SSZ USC develops large composite shipbuilding

Requires verification

  • Current legal and organizational status of SNPG MT "Inmortrans"
  • What exactly is meant by "Ocean 80": legal entity, project, naval outline or other participant
  • Existing arrangements between listed parties

Published files

Technology · Full published text

Accounting Group and Computational GRID

Source Status: Primary Document

The concept of a distributed environment for data processing, registers, balances, analytics, AI-models and validation centers.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/uchetnaya-gruppa-vychislitelnyi-grid

Open on the site

Master document: distributed environment of accounting, data, registers, balances and validation

Purposecreate a distributed accounting group as a digital loop for managing data, rights, assets, liabilities and results
BaseFederal databases, registries, validation centers, data archive, AI-models, analytics and balance circuits
Formuladata + rules + calculations + validation + responsibility = managed balance

1. The essence of concept

  • GRID provides distributed processing: tasks are performed on the network of nodes, and the result is collected into a single picture.
  • The accounting group provides semantic discipline: each object has a code, passport, owner, source, status, cost, connections and history of changes.
  • The system connects financial, material, intangible, environmental, technological and social accounting into a single model of balance sheets.
  • The main result is not the accumulation of files, but a managed environment of trusted data and verifiable calculations.

2. Architecture of Computational Grid

LayerCompositionFunctionResult
Datasources, sensors, documents, databases, archivescollection and normalizationUnified Data Field
Registriesassets, IA, liabilities, projects, entitiesIdentification of objectsPassports and Statuses
Calculationsservers, cloud, HPC, containers, task queuesCalculation of models and scenariosProductivity
Rulesclassifiers, methods, standards, control proceduresuniformity of accountingComparability
Validationverification centers, audit, version control, signaturesTrust in datalegal and managerial reliability
AnalysisBI, AI, digital twins, forecastsIdentification of links and deviationsDecisions and priorities
Balancecross-industry, project, stock, environmental balance sheetsContouringSustainability Map

3. Logic of the accounting group

  1. Each object receives a unique code and passport.
  2. Each operation is recorded as an event with a source, time, subject, and base.
  3. Each value has an origin: where it is taken, who checked, by what method is calculated.
  4. Each balance is collected from linked registries rather than manually from disparate tables.
  5. Each model AI works only on top of verified data and retains the calculation trail.
  6. Each decision is returned to the system as a control effect and a new record of history.

4. Main registries

RegisterWhat countsWhy is it necessary
Register of subjectsorganizations, people, foundations, competence centersLiability and access rights
Register of assetsproperty, equipment, infrastructure, resourcesmaterial balance
Register of IArights, software, databases, techniques, brands, know-howcapitalization of knowledge
Data registerdata sets, sources, versions, qualityTrusted Analytics
Register of projectsprograms, pilots, tasks, deadlines, KPIPerformance Management
Register of obligationscontracts, orders, terms, payments, risksMonitoring of execution
Register of modelsalgorithms, AI-models, calculation methodsVerifiable Calculations
The Balance Registerresource, financial, environmental, industry contoursSustainability Management

5. Computational Outline

  • Federated databases: data remains with the owners, but becomes available according to the rules of exchange and agreed interfaces.
  • Distributed computing nodes: tasks can be run in departmental, corporate, regional and project centers.
  • Task queue: heavy calculations, simulations, reconciliations and training models are distributed according to available resources.
  • Catalog of services: balance sheet calculation, data verification, forecasts, optimization, reports, object passports and scenario modeling.
  • Security Outline: Encryption, Access Delimitation, Logging, Change Control, and Backup.

6. Validation Centers

  • Methodical validation: verification of formulas, methods, classifiers and calculation rules.
  • Data: Check sources, completeness, relevance, consistency and access rights.
  • Legal Validation: Confirmation of rights, powers, contractual bases and limitations.
  • Financial validation: reconciliation of estimates, costs, liabilities, payments, and effects.
  • Technical validation: software tests, load, fault tolerance, cybersecurity, reproducibility of calculations.

7. Contact EQUILIBRIUM, Archive and Funds

  • EQUILIBRIUM: The upper analytical layer that sees balance sheets, connections, deviations, risks, and development scenarios.
  • Heritage preservation archive: long-term storage of source documents, versions, authorship, evidence and context of origin.
  • The system of funds: distribution of assets, NMA, rights, resources and obligations on personal, name, project and branch funds.
  • SPECZASHCHITA: implementation loop - data collection, node deployment, verification, integration and maintenance.
  • SUR: Management layer of development, where balance sheets become a mechanism of decisions, not just reporting.

8. Data and Balance Matrix

BalanceDataCalculationsVerificationDecision
Financialpayments, budgets, liabilitiesvault, forecast, cash gapsreconciliation and auditPriority of funding
Resourcematerials, energy, technologyDeficits and reservesInventoryRedeployment
NMArights, software, data, methodsCost and effectlegal purityCapitalization
Environmentalair, water, soil, biocenosesload and recoverySensors and LaboratoriesRecovery measures
PersonnelCompetencies, roles, downloadsbottlenecksCertificationTraining
Projectstages, KPI, risksExecution scenariostime controlCorrection of the road map

9. Roadmap for launch

StageTimeframeActionsWithdrawal
0. Design0–30 daysapprove model, classifiers, roles, passport templatesarchitecture and regulations
1. Inventory30–90 dayscollect sources, bases, documents, assets and IAPrimary Data Outline
2. Pilot of GRID60–120 daysdeploy nodes, storage, exchange, task queueWorking Computational Outline
3. Registers and passports90–180 daysto enter registers of subjects, assets, NMAs, projects, modelsthe Single Accounting Group
4. Balances120–240 dayscollect financial, resource, NMA, environmental and project balancesthe Management Panel
5. Scaling180–365 daysconnect funds, archive, validation centers and AI-servicesNational/corporate system

10. KPI and maturity criteria

  • Share of objects with passport and data owner, %.
  • Percentage of transactions with confirmed source and immutable log, %.
  • Balance preparation time: from weeks and days to hours and minutes.
  • Number of discrepancies between registers and actual data.
  • Performance calculations and the cost of one calculation.
  • The number of models that have undergone methodological and technical validation.
  • Percentage of management decisions based on verifiable data and calculations.
  • The level of fault tolerance: redundancy, recovery, cyber protection.

11. Final decision

  1. Establish an Account Group as a permanent body/contours for maintaining registries, balances and data.
  2. Deploy computing GRID as a distributed infrastructure for processing, reconciliation and modeling.
  3. Appoint owners of data, methodologies, registers, models, and balances.
  4. Run the pilot on one project contour: NMA + funds + archive + balances + validation centers.
  5. Convert pilot best practices to scaling standard.

Other published edition: Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_presentation Uchetnaya_gruppa_vychislitelnyy_grid_presentation.pptx · web text +

Accounting Group + Computing GRID

Essence of the decision

From accounting as reporting to accounting as a management system

Data

Calculations

sources, versions, quality, origin

models, scenarios, reconciliations, forecasts

• Distributed processing of data and calculations

• Uniform passports of objects, operations and assets

• Verifiable Registers and Balances

• AI-models only on top of verified data

• management trail of each decision

Validation

Balances

law, methodology, audit, control

finance, resources, IA, ecology

The result: a managed environment of trusted data and verifiable computing.

Architecture of GRID

Seven layers of distributed accounting and computing system

1. Data

2. Registries

3. Calculations

4. Rules

sources, documents, sensors

entities, assets, NMA, projects

HPC, cloud, containers

methods, classifiers

5. Validation

6. Analytics

7. Balance

audit, signatures, control

BI, AI, digital twins

Contouring

Layers are not isolated: each calculation is related to the source, rule, check, and management decision.

Registers of the accounting group

Unified framework of objects, rights, data, operations and models

Subjects

Assets

NMA

Data

organizations, people, funds

assets, resources, infrastructure

rights, software, database, methods

sources, versions, quality

Projects

Obligations

Models

Balances

stages, KPI, risks

contracts, payments, terms

algorithms, formulas, AI

finance, resources, environment

Data Flow

From Event to Balance

Event

Document

Register

Verification

Calculation

Balance

Decision

• every step has a source, author, time, version and basis

• fixes do not erase history, but create a new verifiable layer

• solution returns to system as control effect

Validation Centers

Speed without checking is dangerous: GRID must be trusted

Methodology

Data

Right

Finance

Techniques

formulas, rules, classifiers

completeness, relevance, consistency

powers, contracts, access rights

cost, liabilities, payments

load, safety, reproducibility

The main principle is that no key indicator is accepted without the source, methodology and trace of verification.

Balance Matrix

Each material contour has a digital and intangible support

Financial

Resource

NMA

budgets, payments, liabilities

materials, energy, technology

rights, software, data, methods

Environmental

Personnel

Project

air, water, soil, biocenoses

roles, competencies, downloads

stages, KPI, risks

Integration into the system

EQUILIBRIUM — Archive — Funds — SPECZASHCHITA — SUR

EQUILIBRIUM

Archive

analytics, scenarios, balances

origin, versions, evidence

Accounting
Group + GRID

Funds

SPECZASHCHITA

ownership, rights, resources

implementation, operation, control

SUR: Balance Sheets as a Development Management System

Roadmap for launch

From model to working pilot for 12 months

0–30

30–90

60–120

90–180

120–240

180–365

Design

Inventory

GRID Pilot

Registers and Passports

Balance Sheets

Scaling

Output of the first cycle: the workflow of data, registers, calculations, validation and management panel.

KPI mature

How to know if the system is managed

• share of objects with a passport and data owner

• balance preparation time reduced to hours

• Percentage of transactions with source under verification

• Number of discrepancies between registers and facts

• performance and cost per calculation

• Percentage of models validated

• Number of management decisions based on data

• failover and recovery rate

• Number of closed legal/methodical defects

• monetary and resource effect of implementation

Final decision

What needs to be approved

• create the Accounting Group as a permanent outline of registers and balances

• deploy computational GRID for reconciliation, calculation and simulation

• Appoint owners of data, methodologies, models and registries

• Launch Pilot: NMA + Funds + archive + Balance Sheets + Validation

• Convert pilot to scaling standard

A digital Counting System for development: every resource has a profile, every action leaves a trace, and every balance becomes a management tool.

The pilot loop is prepared as a single system: data → registers → calculations → validation → balances → solutions.

Published files

Technology · Full published text

Computational GRID and Metacomputers

Source Status: Primary Document

A concept for federated databases, distributed computing and metacomputer infrastructure.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/vychislitelnyi-grid-i-metakompyutery

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA · SPECZASHCHITA · ARCHIVE OF HERITAGE

Author: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · 29 August 2026

Status: Architectural hypothesis for technical, legal and independent expert verification

02 / MANUAL SOLUTION

Allow 90-day pilot on three autonomous circuits

To check whether it is possible to assemble a temporary metacomputer for the task, perform a calculation next to the data and release the reproduced result - without centralizing the primary arrays.

Main thesis
Don't build another supercomputer. Create a trusted layer that combines disparate power, data, and rules into a managed metacomputer for the duration of a specific task.

ParameterProposal
PerimeterThree independent administrative domains: HPC/CPU, GPU/container circuit and domain data node.
ScriptsClosely related computation; mass ensemble; federated analytics with the transfer of computation to data.
ModeSynthetic, anonymized or specially authorized data; without automatic inclusion of critical production sets.
ResultWorking prototype, policy log, origin manifest, time/value/network exchange measurement and independent protocol.
Decision on the 90th dayGO, CONDITIONAL GO or STOP by pre-approved criteria.

Recommended solution
Approve the design pilot; industrial scaling, real sensitive data and inter-circuit records allow only individual solutions.

03 / PROBLEM AND PURPOSE EFFECT

There are capacities, but they do not form a common managed resource.

Clusters, clouds, accelerators and databases belong to different organizations, use different queues, policies, identifiers and result formats.

  • Break 1. It is difficult to know where CPU, GPU are, memory, network, licenses, and local data.
  • Break 2. Planners manage the site well, but do not see the powers and capabilities of neighboring domains.
  • Break 3. Copying large arrays to the center creates delays, takes, leak risk, and owner dispute.
  • Break 4. Closely related HPC tasks, mass ensembles, and AI loads require different executive circuits.
  • Break 5. A result without a code version, inputs, policies, and environment cannot be independently reproduced.
  • Break 6. Cost, energy, waiting in line, and network egress are often considered separate.

Target effect
Reduce the path from a computational query to a verifiable result, while maintaining local sovereignty of sites and data owners.

04 / TERMS MAP

Four definitions define the limits of the system

ConceptWorking definitionA hard border
Computational GridFederation of resources of different control contours with general rules of identification, detection, routing, start and accounting.Not a single cluster and not a global administrator.
MetacomputerTemporary logic machine, assembled under the task from suitable CPU, GPU, HPC, cloud and edge resources.Does not promise shared memory and low latency between all nodes.
Federated Data LayerCatalog, semantics, policy and execution of permitted requests over offline sources.Not a single world base and not automatic replication of sources.
Large calculationsTasks that exceed the capabilities of a single node or circuit by data, operations, memory, accelerators, or response time.The size is determined by the task profile, not the advertising label.

Criteria GRID are based on the work of Ian Foster: coordination of resources of different administrative domains, open universal protocols and non-trivial quality of service [1–2].

Formula
GRID = TRUST + CATALOGUE + PRIVACY + MARCHRUTIZATION + EXECUTION + TRAINING + PROOF

05 / PRINCIPLES AND INVARIANTS

A federation is strong only with predefined restrictions.

1. Local Sovereignty. The site retains the owner, local planner, quotas, access rules, and the right to refuse.

2. If possible, the code, plan, and allowed projection are moved to the data, not the entire source array.

3. The general layer sees only the required resource card, policy, state and agreed result.

4. Open contracts. canonical descriptions of the task, resource, data and result are separated from the specific product.

5. Different Load Routes. MPI/HPC, HTC, AI/GPU, SQL- federation and streaming tasks are not reduced to one queue.

6. Policy like code tolerance, data zone, deadline, target, egress limit and authority are checked before and during launch.

7. Reproducibility: The result contains versions of code, environment, inputs, parameters, policies, and checksums.

8. Independent verification. the operator does not confirm its own safety and correctness alone.

Invariant
The local outline can reject the task; the general layer does not bypass local policy and does not require a single root access.

06 / PLACE IN ECOSYSTEM

GRID turns an analytical query into a verifiable computational execution

ContourRoleLimit of responsibility
EQUILIBRIUMIt forms a question, scenario, risk model, and outcome requirements.It does not own the source data and does not administer the site.
Computational GridPicks up resources, builds a plan, gets tolerances, starts and controls the task.Does not replace local planners and owners.
System of funds / ECO-PPAEstablishes the project mandate, budget, contract, data and expected outcome.It is not a computing backend.
SPECZASHCHITADeployment, reinforcement, operation, response and cooperation.They don’t do their own work alone.
SFERAParticipants, competencies, use cases, knowledge and feedback.Does not replace the admissions authority and scheduler.
Heritage archiveVersions, origin, access decisions, manifestos, and permitted results.It is not necessary to centralize sensitive sources.

Formula
QUESTION → PASSPORT OF THE TASK → METACOMPUTER → CALCULATION → VERIFICATION → ARCHIVE → NEW CYCLE

07 / TASK ARCHITECTURE

Five planes share powers and flows

1. Trust. Federal identification, attributes, roles, certificates, service accounts, review and decision log.

2. Management. resource catalog, job broker, policy engine, orchestrator, quotas, SLA and adapters to local systems.

3. Calculations. SlurmMPI, HTCondor/workflow, Kubernetes Jobs, GPU/FPGA and other specialized executive contours.

4. Data. domain databases, object and file storages, directories, connectors, pushdown, staging and release projections.

5. Evidence. telemetry, accounting, lineage, checksums, manifestos, independent verification and Heritage Archive.

Separation of flows
The control layer transmits tasks and state; mass data goes through the permitted data path directly between sites or is processed on-site.

Open interfaces reduce vendor binding; local products are connected by adapters [3–4].

08 / CONTOUR OF CONFIDENCE AND MANAGEMENT

Before launch, the system should answer seven questions

QuestionVerified objectGateway Result
Who?User, service, organization, role, attributes.Confirmed identity.
Why?Purpose of processing, project, legal and contractual basis.Authorized appointment.
Huh?Code, container, model, version, dependencies, SBOM.Accepted artefact.
Over what?Dataset ID, data class, owner, permitted projection.Allowed entrances.
Where?Outline, region, hardware profile, trusted area.Permissible accommodation.
How long?CPU/GPU, memory, time, egress, budget, energy.Quota and limits.
What can be released?Aggregates, model, report, artifact, sensitivity.The result policy.

The Zero Trust
Network location is not a sufficient basis of trust. Access is assessed for a specific subject, resource and context, and the decision is enforced at the point of application of the policy [24].

09 / METACOMPUTERS FORMATION

The metacomputer is collected for the duration of the task and then disassembled

  1. The task passport fixes the target, code, data, SLA, limitations, error price and result criteria.
  2. The directory returns compatible sites, software versions, accelerators, network conditions, and data locality.
  3. The broker builds several execution plans and evaluates queue time, data portability, cost, and risk.
  4. Policy engine checks each site, data set, image, authority and valid result.
  5. The orchestrator reserves resources and translates the canonical assignment into Slurm, HTCondor or Kubernetes.
  6. During execution, telemetry, checkpoints, policy events, resource accounting, and lineage are collected.
  7. After verification, the result is issued; temporary credentials are withdrawn, and the staging is cleared by policy.

Limitation
WAN does not turn into a local bus. A closely related MPI problem is usually placed entirely in one low-latency HPC circuit; tasks, data, and results are federalized between sites [10].

10 / LOADING AND MARCHRUTIZATION CLASSES

The right backend is more important than a single universal queue

ClassSignPreferred routeKey metrics
HPC / MPIClose communication, low latency, collective exchanges.Slurm + MPI in one site.Time-to-solution, scaling.
HTC / ensemblesMany independent or loosely coupled launches.HTCondor + DAG/workflow.Set/day, success rate.
AI / GPUAccelerators, large models, containers, data nearby.Kubernetes Jobs or GPU-section Slurm.GPU utilisation, time/age.
Big DataScan/join/aggregation over domain sources.Federated query + pushdown/materialization.Bytes moved, query latency.
Edge / StreamReal time, limited channel, local context.Local execution of + units.Delay, loss of events.
WorkflowA chain of different stages and sites.Orchestrator + checkpoints + lineage.Critical path, repeatability.

Slurm manages resources and queues within the cluster [5–7]; HTCondor optimizes the accumulated amount of calculations over time8–9]; Kubernetes Jobs is one of the backends for completed container tasks [11–13].

11 / FEDERAL DATABASE

The request passes between the contours, the primary data remains with the owner

Catalog. publishes Dataset ID, owner, schema, version, quality, classification, statistics and endpoint without the mandatory publication of the data itself.

Semantics. domain dictionaries and versioned mappings link terms; a single giant scheme is not required.

The request plan. filter, projection, aggregation and allowable join are transferred to the source; the transfer plan and evaluation are checked before launch.

Data path. Arrow Flight/Flight SQL or other gateways transmit allowed large flows; transport does not replace authorization.

Materialization. Agreed derivative sets and results are recorded as versioned snapshots; the sources remain domain-specific.

Record. interdomain OLTP is not considered atomic without a proven distributed commit; local record, idempotent jobs and sagas are preferred.

Rule of admission
Full scan, cross-source cross join and unlimited egress are prohibited by default. First, pushdown, selectivity, result limit and allowable cost [15–19] are proved.

12 / DATA CONTRACT AND ORIGIN

Each entry and result receives a passport, not just a file name

Contract fieldMinimum content
IdentityCanonical dataset_id / result_id, owner, domain, contact, destination.
VersionSchema, snapshot, time slice, checksum, date of relevance.
SemanticsVocabulary terms, units, encodings, time zone, null/collation semantics.
QualityCompleteness, accuracy, allowable omissions, statistics and the date of its updating.
PolicyClass, Target, Subjects, Zones, Term, Egress, Masking, Retention.
InterfaceEndpoint, protocol, query capabilities, pushdown, rate/size limits.
Lineagejob_id/run_id, code, image, parameters, inputs, outputs, conversions.
ReleaseValidator, tolerance, restriction of interpretation, validity period of the result.

Heritage archive
Stores the manifest, versions, access decisions, evidence, and permitted results. Sensitive sources may remain with the owner; the archive retains the reference and origin [20–22].

13 / LIFE CYCLE OF THE TASK

Eight gateways make the launch manageable and controversial

GatewayDecisionObligatory trace
J0 · RequestThere is a question owner and a measurable result.Passport request.
J1 ·The load, data and zone are defined.Class of task and data.
J2 ·Subject and purpose are allowed.Policy decision + basis.
J3 ·Allowable route and backend are selected.Plan, time/price/egress estimates.
J4 ·Quotas, devices, data and window are highlighted.Reservation / allocation IDs.
J5 ·Task within policy and SLA.Telemetry, events, checkpoints.
J6 · VerificationThe result is correct and safe to release.Tests, validator, checksum.
J7 · ArchiveThe chain is reproducible; accesses are revoked.Manifest, lineage, release record.

Fail closed
If there is no mandatory attribute, policy, statistics, signature, validator or exit limit, the task does not move to the next gateway.

14 / SOVEREIGNTY AND SAFETY

Protection is built around the resource, data and output of the result

Identity. Short-lived service credentials, mTLS, trust federation, attributes and quick feedback.

Authorization. policy decision for each call and task; the local point of application does not trust the central solution without verification.

Isolation. separation of tenant/job, sandbox, network policy, protected secrets, signed images, and allowlist artifacts.

Data. classification, minimization, masking, encryption, keys in the local outline and egress control.

Result. check for disclosure, aggregation, line/volume limits, labeling, owner approval.

Supply chain. source code version, SBOM, build signature, scan, provenance and playable image.

Incident. task isolation, credentials recall, preservation of evidence, owner notification and independent review.

Russian Outline
Prior to the pilot, a legal classification of data and systems is required 149-FZ, 152-FZ, 187-FZ and by-laws. This document is not a legal opinion[25–27].

15 / RELIABILITY AND SAFETY

A single domain failure should not become a federation failure.

MalfunctionResponsePilot check
Unavailable PlaygroundRedesign only on a compatible and permitted resource.Artificial domain shutdown.
Network BreakLocal continuation, event buffer, checkpoint or secure stop.Channel restriction/loss of communication.
Node failureStep repeat, recovery from checkpoint, idempotency.Kill node / pod / task.
Expired admissionNew policy decision; without it, stop and recall.Revocation of role during the assignment.
Changed schemeFail fast or versioned adapter; record the fact of incompatibility.Controlled schema drift.
Unreliable resultQuarantine, repeat, independent inspection and release ban.Fault injection / corrupted output.
Control plane failureBackup status; local jobs do not get new privileges.Restarting the orchestrator.

Formula
RELIABILITY = IDEMPOTENCE + CHECKPOINT + LOCALIZATION OF THE CANCEL + OBSERVATION + VERIFICATION

16 / OBSERVATION AND RESOURCE ACCOUNTING

A single trace links the question, plan, launch, data, and result

SignalWhat to MeasureManagement sense
Tracejob_id/run_id, gateways, adapters, backend, data endpoints.Where there was a delay or rejection.
Metricsqueue time, wall time, CPU/GPU/memory, bytes moved, retries.Efficiency and bottlenecks.
LogsPolicy decisions, planner events, mistakes, manual actions.Investigation and liability.
ProfilesCode resource consumption and hot spots.Optimization of the application.
Accountingresource-time, licenses, egress, energy, site rate.The cost of the task and quota.
Lineageversions of inputs, code, image, parameters and outputs.reproducibility of the result.

Unit of calculation
The account refers to a specific job/run and is confirmed by the local site. The proposed pilot tolerance for the discrepancy between consolidated and local accounting is not more than ±5%.

OpenTelemetry links trades, metrics, and logs through a common context [23]; Slurm supports task and step resource accounting [7].

17 / PILOT TOPOLOGY

Three domains are enough to test the principle of federation

DomainResource and local controlAdapterThe tested hypothesis
A · HPC/CPUSlurm, MPI, parallel to FS, local IAM/QoS.Grid→Slurm.A closely related task remains on one site.
B · GPU/containersKubernetes Jobs or GPU-section Slurm, registry, device plugs.Grid→K8s/Slurm.Selection of accelerator and reproducible image.
C · Data/edgeDomain database/object storage, own policy and gateway.Federated query/Flight.Calculation to data and release of projection.
  • Total layer. Federated identity, catalogs, policy engine, broker, orchestrator, telemetry and lineage.
  • Local layer. Owners retain planners, data, keys, quotas, logs, and right STOP.
  • independent control. Separately checks safety, measurements, reproducibility and GO criteria.

Not included automatically
Critical CII, combat personal data, intercontour OLTP and promise of production SLA. Their connection requires a separate admission.

18 / THREE Scenarios

Pilot checks different computational modes with one rule system

ScenarioRouteVerified result
1. Biosphere Risk Ensemble ModelingHundreds of independent options → HTC; aggregation → HPC/analytical node.Shortening of time-to-first-result, success of repetitions, lineage of each option.
2. GPU-analysis of spatial dataContainer and model to the permitted GPU/data; release mask/unit.Selection of the device, image control, absence of unauthorized source output.
3. Federated water, soil and biodiversity analyticsCatalog → pushdown to domain sources → agreed result.Volume of movement, correctness of semantics, request plan and reproducibility.

Baseline
Prior to integration, each scenario is executed in an existing way. The comparison is built with a fixed base in time, manual labor, bytes moved, cost and quality of the result.

Scenarios are a proposal for approbation, not a statement of performance achieved.

19 / PLAN ON 90 DAYS

Five control stages lead from passport to independent solution

PeriodWorksControl output
Days 1–15Three tasks, baseline, owners, classification of data, boundaries, SLA and STOP-criteria.Pilot Passport and Architectural Solutions.
Days 16–30Domain connectivity, federal identity, resource/data directories, policy model.Three registered nodes and dry tolerances.
Days 31–55Broker, adapters, workflow, telemetry, accounting, lineage and first end-to-end startup.A working prototype and a manifesto of the result.
Days 56–75Repeated runs, load, node failure, network rupture, power withdrawal, egress control.Sustainability and Security Protocol.
Days 76–90Independent verification, reproducibility, cost, runbooks, liability model.Conclusion GO / CONDITIONAL GO / STOP.

Change management
Any extension of data, sites, powers or public promises is issued as a new version of the perimeter and is re-allowed.

20 / KPI AND NOTE CRITERIA

GO requires both functional, safe and economic results

CriterionProposed pilot threshold
FederationConnected ≥3 independent administrative domains; local policies are maintained.
Scripts3 cross-cutting scenarios of different load classes were performed.
ReliabilityAfter stabilization ≥95% Starts without manual recovery.
SpeedFor 2 out of 3 time-to-first-result scenarios, it is better to baseline at least 30%.
Sovereignty0 Unauthorized primary data transfers between circuits.
Policy100% inter-circuit operations are verified and logged.
Lineage100% released results have owner, inputs, code, parameters and versions.
Reproducibility≥90% the test results are repeated in the prescribed tolerance.
ConnectivityNew compatible node connects ≤5 working days according to the instructions.
AccountingDifference between consolidated and local resource/value accounting ≤±5%.
SecurityThere are no unclosed criticisms; there is an independent protocol.

All numerical thresholds are the pilot’s design criteria. They are not an industry standard and are adjusted prior to launch along with the baseline.

21 / RISKS AND MANAGEMENT MODEL

The main risk is to create the appearance of unity where clear boundaries are needed.

RiskEarly SignalControl measure
Global rootThe center requires permanent privileges at all nodes.Short-lived rights, local PEP, role-sharing.
Centralization of dataThe pilot begins by copying all sets.Catalog and pushdown; egress budget; local snapshots.
Universal PlannerThe same policy for MPI, HTC, AI and SQL.Load classification and adapters to the backend.
Semantic ErrorThe names of the fields coincide, but the meaning/units differ.Glossary, mappings, quality checks and versions.
Vendor lock-inThe canonical model repeats API of one product.Open contracts and adapter replacement test.
Hidden costDoes not take into account queue, egress, license, energy.Single job accounting and reconciliation of sites.
Non-reproducibleThe result is released without a snapshot input or code version.J6/J7 fail closed; manifesto required.
Self-checkThe operator alone confirms the security and KPI.Independent validator and acceptance protocol.

STOP-criteria
Unresolved egress, circumvention of local politics, loss of origin, critical vulnerability without compensation or the inability to independently verify the pilot.

22 / SOLUTION AND NEXT

GRID creates a common order of trusted computing, not a common store of resources

Final thesis
The site stores resources, data and rules. GRID adds overall identity, catalog, planning, evidence, and safe release of the result.

GO. all critical criteria are met; the next queue with new nodes and loads is allowed.

CONDITIONAL GO. value is confirmed, but there is a limited list of closing gaps and a deadline for rechecking.

STOP. sovereignty, security, reproducibility or economics are not confirmed; the prototype is archived without industrial expansion.

Next Post GoSubject
InteroperabilityTest of the second product in each class: scheduler, catalog, data transport, observability.
ScaleConnecting new organizations, quotas, multi-level policies, and load modelling.
EconomyTariff units, reservation, cost allocation, energy and dispute mechanism.
Law and TrustFederation agreement, responsibility, certificates, audit, response and exit procedure.

Requested action
Appoint a pilot owner, three domain owners and an independent validator; approve a passport and baseline within 15 days.

23 / OFFICIAL AND PRIMARY SOURCES · 1

GRID, planning and executive contours

[1] Ian Foster: What Is the Grid? A Three Point Checklist

[2] Foster, Kesselman, Tuecke: The Anatomy of the Grid

[3] Open Grid Forum: Standards and interoperability

[4] Open Grid Forum: Authorization Framework (GFD.38)

[5] Slurm Workload Manager: Overview

[6] Slurm Workload Manager: Federation Guide

[7] Slurm Workload Manager: Accounting and Resource Limits

[8] HTCondor: High-Throughput Computing and its Requirements

[9] HTCondor Manual: Job Scheduling

[10] MPI Forum: MPI 5.0 Standard

[11] Kubernetes: Jobs

[12] Kubernetes: Scheduling Framework

[13] Kubernetes: Device Plugins

[14] Globus: Collections and Endpoints

Date of treatment: 29 August 2026 Versions of software products and documents should be re-checked before pilot design.

24 / OFFICIAL AND PRIMARY SOURCES · 2

Federated data, origin, observation and safety

[15] Trino: Concepts and federated catalogs

[16] Trino PostgreSQL connector: Pushdown

[17] PostgreSQL: postgres_fdw Remote Query Optimization

[18] Apache Iceberg: Table Specification

[19] Apache Arrow: Flight RPC and Flight SQL

[20] W3C: Data Catalog Vocabulary DCAT 3

[21] W3C: PROV-O — provenance ontology

[22] OpenLineage: Object Model

[23] OpenTelemetry: Signals and context propagation

[24] NIST SP 800-207: Zero Trust Architecture

[25Federal Law No 149-FZ "On Information, Information Technology and Information Protection"

[26Federal Law No 152-FZ "About personal data"

[27Federal Law No 187-FZ "On the security of critical information infrastructure of the Russian Federation"

Legal references are given for guidance. Applicability of norms, editorial and regulatory requirements is confirmed by specialized lawyers and owners of information systems before data access.

Other published edition: Computational GRID Vychislitelnyi_GRID_Metakompyutery_Federativnye_bazy_Bolshie_vychisleniya.pptx · web text +

Metacomputers, Federal Bases, and Big Computing

General procedure of trusted calculation

Local ownership of resources and data

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The solution now is a limited 90-day pilot

REQUEST FOR SOLUTION

Perimeter

tasks, baseline, data, owners, STOP-criteria

Connection

Identity, directories, policies and adaptors

DAYS

End-to-end launch

HPC, GPU/AI and Federal Analytics

3 Autonomous Domains

3 Load class

1 independent protocol

Tests

node failure, revocation, egress and reproducibility

Decision

GO, CONDITIONAL GO or STOP by measurable KPI

Industrial scaling - only a separate solution

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Isolated capacity does not form a common resource

THE PROBLEM

What breaks the end-to-end calculation

HPC

MPI / CPU / low latency

different identities, queues, quotas and task formats

copy large arrays instead of computing next to data

GPU

AI / Accelerators / Containers

One universal policy for MPI, HTC, AI and SQL

DATA

result without input version, code, environment and access decision

domain databases / objects / edge

separate account of queue, egress, accelerators, energy and cost

Centralization in just one place carries the problem — but does not solve it

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Four definitions define the limits of the system

TERMS

the Federation of Resources of Different Management Circuits

COMPUTER GRID

not a single cluster

temporary logic machine, assembled for the task

METACOMPUTER

not total WAN-memory

catalog, policy and permissioned query over offline sources

FEDERAL DATA SLAY

not a global database

a task beyond the capabilities of a single node or circuit

LARGE COMPUTING

Not an advertising label

GRID = Trust + catalog + Policy + route + execution + Accounting + Proof

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Three invariants keep the federation from centralizing

ARCHITECTURAL PRINCIPLES

Local Sovereignty

Calculating to data

Verified result

The site retains the scheduler, quotas, keys, data, and right STOP.

The code, plan, and permitted projection are moved; the sources remain with the owner.

Versions of inputs, code, environment, policies, and lineage are mandatory.

default deny

policy-as-code

Open contracts

Different backend

independent verification

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

GRID connects the question, calculation and proof

LOCATION IN THE ECOSYSTEM

EQUILIBRIUM

GRID

VERIFICATION

ARCHIVE

question, scenario, risk and requirements

plan, resources, tolerances and performance

correctness, safety and release

version, lineage and permitted result

SFERA

SPECZASHCHITA

ECO-PPA / FUNDS

participants, competencies, cases and knowledge

Deployment, operation and response

mandate, contract, budget and expected results

No circuit combines data ownership, execution and final self-testing

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Five planes share powers and flows

TARGET ARCHITECTURE

telemetry · accounting · lineage · Control amounts · Archive

5 · PROOF

catalog · semantics · pushdown · staging · permitted projections

4 · DATA

Slurm/MPI · HTCondor/workflow · Kubernetes Jobs · GPU/edge

3 · COMPUTERING

resource catalog · broker · organizer · policy engine · quotas

2 · GOVERNANCE

identity · Roles · attributes · Certificates · Review · Audit

1 · TRUST

CONTROL PLANE

DATA PLANE

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Metacomputer is going to the task and then disappears

DYNAMIC ASSEMBLY

PASSPORT

CATALOGUE

PLAN

ADDRESS

STARTING

target · code · data · SLA

CPU/GPU · Software · Zone · Queue

Time · Egress · Price · Risk

identity · policy · quota

Slurm · Condor · K8s

IN TIME

telemetry · checkpoints · policy events · resource accounting

AFTER

result check · manifest · rights review · cleaning staging

WAN does not become a local bus: a closely related MPI problem is placed in one low-latency HPC-circuit

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The request passes between the contours - the sources remain

FEDERAL DATA SLAY

Domain A

QUERY + POLICY

Domain B

DB / Object Storage

owner · policy · keys

catalog · semantics · plan

pushdown · egress budget

Permitted projection

unit · snapshot · result

Mandatory inspections

PROHIBITED BY SILENCE

  • statistics and request plan are relevant
  • filter / projection / aggregation are performed at the source
  • transfer volume and result size are limited
  • Semantics of units, time, null and types agreed
  • interdomain record is not assumed to be atomic without proof

full scan

cross-source cross join

unlimited egress

"One World BD"

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Eight locks make the task manageable

LIFE CYCLE

Request

Class

Rights

Plan

who + why + over what + where + how many + what can be released

Archive

Verification

Launch

Reserve

No mandatory attribute, signature, limit or validator - the next gateway is closed

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Safety, observation and reproducibility are uniform

TRUST IN THE RESULT

PROTECTION

OBSERVATION

REPRODUCTIVENESS

identity

short credentials

Local Keys

Isolation

Egress Control

trace

metrics

logs

profiles

accounting

Input snapshot

code version

image and parameters

policy decision

lineage

Russian contour: applicability 149-FZ, 152-FZ, 187-FZ and by-law measures are qualified by the owners of the systems before the data are admitted

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Three Autonomous Domains Test the GRID Principle

PILOT TOPOLOGY

A · HPC / CPU

GRID CONTROL

B · GPU / AI

Slurm · MPI · Local IAM/QoS

catalog · broker · policy · orchestrator

Kubernetes Jobs or GPU-section Slurm

Local owners retain keys, data, quotas and the right to emergency stop

C · DATA / EDGE

Domain DB · Object Storage · Gateway

Independent control: safety · reproducibility · KPI · protocol GO/STOP

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Three scenarios go through five stages in 90 days

PILOT PLAN

Biosphere Ensemble

GPU-space analysis

Water · Soil · biodiversity

HTC + aggregation

container to data

federated query + pushdown

1–15

16–30

31–55

56–75

76–90

Passport

and baseline

Domains

and Policy

Prototype

The First Run

Load

and refusals

verification

and solution

Before integration, each scenario fixes the existing baseline: time · manual labor · bytes moved · cost · quality

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

STOP

CRITERIA OF NOTES

GO requires both use, control and reproducibility

  • 3 Domain · 3 script
  • ≥95% successful launches after stabilization
  • −30% time-to-first-result for 2 from 3 Scenario
  • 0 Unauthorized primary data movements
  • 100% operations with policy log and 100% results with lineage
  • Disagreement of Resource Accounting ≤ ±5%

Circumvention of local policy

Unresolved Egress

Loss of Origin of Result

Critical vulnerability without compensation

Impossibility of independent verification

Thresholds: Pilot design criteria, not industry standard

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The next step is to approve the pilot’s passport in 15 days

DECISION

GRID does not create a common store of resources,

a General procedure for trusted computing

Appointing a Pilot Owner

Identify the owners of three domains

Appoint an independent validator

Approve tasks, baseline and STOP-criteria

Proposed solution: allow a design pilot without industrial clearance

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Sources cited in presentation 22

  • https://www.mcs.anl.gov/~itf/Articles/WhatIsTheGrid.pdf
  • https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0103025
  • https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/207/final
  • https://slurm.schedmd.com/overview.html
  • https://htcondor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/overview/high-throughput-computing-requirements.html
  • https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/job/
  • https://ogf.org/ogf/doku.php/standards/standards.html
  • https://docs.globus.org/guides/overviews/collections-and-endpoints/
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
  • https://openlineage.io/docs/spec/object-model/
  • https://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/mpi-5.0/mpi50-report.pdf
  • https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/extend-kubernetes/compute-storage-net/device-plugins/
  • https://trino.io/docs/current/overview/concepts.html
  • https://trino.io/docs/current/connector/postgresql.html#pushdown
  • https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/postgres-fdw.html#POSTGRES-FDW-REMOTE-QUERY-OPTIMIZATION
  • https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/Flight.html
  • https://iceberg.apache.org/spec/
  • https://opentelemetry.io/docs/concepts/signals/
  • https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102108264
  • https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102108261
  • https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/view/0001201707260023
  • https://slurm.schedmd.com/accounting.html

Published files

Technology · Full published text

Validation Tools for the Archive and Intelligent System

Source Status: Primary Document

Approaches to verifying data, sources and connections within a digital archive.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/instrumenty-validatsii-arkhiva

Open on the site

and intelligent system

VALIDATION = AVAILABILITY FOR PURPOSE
Verification = Verifiability of approval

Prepared for Sergey Leonidovich
Working version • 26 August 2026

SECTION 01

What is proposed to approve

A unified system of evidence for objects, data, expertise, models AI and effect statements.

Validation should be built into the life cycle of the object and solution: from the reception of the material to the publication, re-research and revision of the conclusion.

№DecisionContents
1Split OperationsIdentification, testing, validation, verification, certification and accreditation have different subjects and powers.
2Create Registry VALEach tool receives a code, the owner of the method, inputs, criteria, proofs, expiration dates, and recheck rules.
3Enter Validation PassportThe solution communicates with the object, approval, method, expert, data version, and event log.
4Use critical gatewaysThe score cannot compensate for the lack of origin, integrity, rights or competent examiner.
5Split execution and decisionAutomation prepares the evidence; the authorized person makes and signs the decision.
6Carry out an independent auditHigh-risk statements and public statements are verified by the party without conflict of interest.

SECTION 02

Terms and boundaries

First, the type of confirmation is determined, then the method and authority are selected.

OperationSubjectExample of result
IdentificationEstablishing that an object or entity is uniquely defined.Passport, steady ID, authoritative record.
Verification / ControlComparison of the result with a specific rule or criterion.Checksum matched; field filled.
TestDetermination of characteristics according to the established procedure.Material composition, strength, spectrum, condition.
CalibrationEstablishing the relationship of indications with reference values and uncertainty.Evidence and traceability of measurement.
ValidationConfirmation of the plausibility and suitability of the statement for the intended future use.The method is suitable for dating this type of sample.
VerificationConfirmation that the statement is true and correctly formulated according to the specified requirements.The report corresponds to the source data and the method.
CertificationConfirmation of compliance by a third party within the established scheme.It is used only when there is a scheme and authority.
AccreditationOfficial recognition of the competence of the body or laboratory.It does not replace the verification of a specific object.

SECTION 03

The object of validation is not a thing, but a statement

A single object can have multiple statements with different methods, risks, and expiration dates.

  • Object. A physical unit, digital file, data set, model, document, collection, or process.
  • Approval. Specific testable wording: "created in 1957", "file unchanged", "method reproduced".
  • Purpose of use. Storage, scientific research, publication, restoration, forensic evidence, training model.
  • Criterion. Measurable acceptance condition, allowable range, completeness rule or expert standard.
  • Proof. Observation, document, measurement, journal, checksum, independent conclusion or reproduction.
  • Decision. Accepted, accepted with conditions, rejected, not applicable, or requiring re-verification.
ElementExample
ApprovalThe archive digital master corresponds to the accepted original.
MethodsChecksum, digitization log, visual control, color rendering control.
CriterionMatch fixity; completeness; no unexplained changes; acceptable quality parameters.
DecisionAccepted for long-term storage; derivatives are created only from an approved wizard.

SECTION 04

Eight Validation Domains

Trust arises only when passing through subject and end-to-end inspections together.

CodeDomainWhat is confirmed
D1Identity and originWho, what, when, where; chain of ownership and storage.
D2Scientific JustificationMethod, attribution, review, reproducibility.
D3Physical conditionInspection, materials, damage, restoration, storage conditions.
D4Digital IntegrityFixity, format, package, copies, recovery, migration.
D5Measurements and dataSampling, calibration, uncertainty, laboratory competence.
D6Rights, Ethics and SecurityLegal basis, access, personal and sensitive information.
D7AI and algorithmsData, metrics, sustainability, explainability, human control.
D8Effect and public statementsBaseline, causality, metrics, independent verification.

SECTION 05

Levels of Evidence V0-V4

The level describes the strength of the confirmation, not the "value" of the object.

LevelStatusMinimum of evidencePermissible use
V0Not verifiedThere is a statement or material, but the origin and method are not confirmed.Do not publish as a fact.
V1Automatic verificationFormat, completeness, checksum, rules, machine prompts.Preliminary status.
V2Check by KeeperCompleteness, communication with the fund, rights, admissions journal, visual control.Internal use.
V3Profile examinationThe competent specialist confirmed the method, attribution and limitations.Scientific/public use.
V4Independent verificationReproduction, interlaboratory comparison or third party without conflict.High-risk decisions and statements.

SECTION 06

Register of instruments VAL: origin and science

Each tool has a method owner, version, scope, and proof template.

CodeToolBasic proof
VAL-01Identity Record AuditID, required fields, duplicates, version.
VAL-02Verification of the chain of originTransmission documents, owners, keepers, breaks.
VAL-03Verification of authoritative recordsPersons, organizations, name variants, dates.
VAL-04Temporary and geographical verificationDate, coordinates, historical boundaries, source.
VAL-05Profile attribution examinationAuthorship, school, typology, scientific context.
VAL-06Independent reviewSecond expert, conflict of interest, disagreement.
VAL-07Reproduction protocolData, code, equipment, parameters, result.
VAL-08Comparison with reference collectionReference objects, signs, deviations.

SECTION 07

Tool register VAL: measurements and preservation

Technical checks should be repeated and leave a machine-readable log.

CodeToolBasic proof
VAL-09Sampling planGeneral system, method of selection, representativeness.
VAL-10Uncertainty BudgetSources of error, calculation, allowable range.
VAL-11Calibration checkCertificate, time, reference, traceability.
VAL-12Interlaboratory comparisonBlind samples, comparison of results, deviations.
VAL-13Verify fixitySHA-256/consistent algorithm, date, copy, result.
VAL-14Format ValidationSpecification compliance, profile, errors, validator version.
VAL-15Checking the transmission packageManifesto, completeness, structure, BagIt/package profile.
VAL-16Control recoveryIsolated copy, time, completeness, suitability of the result.

SECTION 08

Register of tools VAL: Law, AI and effect

Automation and public statements require independent verification lines.

CodeToolBasic proof
VAL-17Matrix of rights and licensesRightholder, basis, territory, term, derivative.
VAL-18Ethical and Private AssessmentSensitivity, consent, minimization, harm.
VAL-19Checking access credentialsRole, purpose, decision, deadline, issue log.
VAL-20Data Passport and ModelsOrigin of the dataset, limitations, model version, assignment.
VAL-21Set of TEVV-testsTesting, evaluation, verification and validation in the context of application.
VAL-22Sustainability and Displacement TestCuts, extreme cases, attacks, errors, unevenness.
VAL-23Journal of Human SolutionProposition AI, confidence, checker, total, base.
VAL-24Monitoring of model and incidentsDrift, quality, complaints, stop, revalidation.
VAL-25The basic line of effectInitial state, period, territory, data source.
VAL-26Indicator profileDefinition, formula, unit, source, periodicity.
VAL-27Verification of causal contributionAlternatives, external factors, assumptions, counterfactual logic.
VAL-28Independent verification of the applicationSample of evidence, materiality, third party opinion.

SECTION 09

Validation Passport

The passport converts the conclusion from text to a reproducible and verifiable record.

BlockRequired fields
IDsID of passport, object, approval, fund, version.
PurposePurpose of use, audience, consequences of error.
AreaWhat is included and excluded; period, territory, sample.
CriteriaStandards, thresholds, tolerances, mandatory locks.
MethodCode VAL, method version, equipment, software, model.
InputsFiles, documents, samples, registry records, checksums.
People carrying out the workRoles, competencies, organization, independence, conflict of interest.
ResultsObservations, measurements, deviations, uncertainty.
DecisionStatus, level V0-V4, conditions, restrictions, validity period.
TraceabilitySignature, date, event log, evidence references and follow-up checks.

SECTION 10

Process: eight checkpoints

The route depends on the risk, but the decision must always be separated from the preparation of evidence.

StepActionWithdrawal
1Approval registrationObject, formulation, purpose, owner.
2Risk assessmentConsequences of error, reversibility, publicity, sensitivity.
3Schema assignmentDomains, tools VAL, level V, critical gateways.
4Automatic pre-controlCompleteness, format, fixity, duplicates, prompts AI.
5Subject-matter verificationGuardian, laboratory or specialist expert.
6Independent verificationAt high risk - third party or reproduction.
7Decision and publicationStatus, conditions, signature, machine-readable record.
8Monitoring and revisionTerm, trigger event, incident, new version of data or method.

SECTION 11

Critical Gateways and Final Solution

The scoring model helps to compare completeness, but does not cancel the mandatory conditions.

GatewayConditionPassing criterion
G1IdentityThe object and version are clearly defined.
G2OriginThere is a sufficient chain of origin or a clearly fixed gap.
G3IntegrityThere are no unexplained changes in the version being tested.
G4Rights and securityThere is a basis for storage, processing and declared mode of use.
G5CompetenceThe method was carried out and the decision was made by an authorized specialist.
G6TraceabilityEvidence, versions, comments and solutions are available for audit.
StatusMeaning
ACCEPTANCEAll mandatory locks have been passed; the criteria have been met.
ACCEPTED WITH THE CONDITIONSThere are non-critical deviations; restrictions and a deadline for elimination are assigned.
CHECK REQUIREMENTSThere is not enough evidence or an independent level is needed.
CONCLUDEDThe critical gateway has not been passed or the claim denied.
NOT APPLICABLEThe method or criterion does not apply to approval; the reason is documented.

SECTION 12

Scientific and laboratory validation

The competence of the laboratory is important, but the result remains related to the method, breakdown and uncertainty.

  • Before the measurement. Define the question, sample matrix, sample, method, detection limits, allowable uncertainty, and control materials.
  • In time. Record equipment, calibration, conditions, operator, deviations, blanks and control samples.
  • After. Check calculations, uncertainty, emissions, data chain, repeatability and suitability for the claimed interpretation.
  • Whatever. For critical conclusions, use a second laboratory, interlaboratory comparison or blind retest.

SECTION 13

Digital and archival validation

Digital preservation is not proved by the presence of a backup, but by regular verification and recovery events.

StageTools of Evidence
AppointmentsManifest, completeness, anti-virus verification, fixity, transmission log.
FormatIdentification and validation of the format, profile, technical dependencies.
StorageMultiple copies, different environments, access control, regular fixity checking.
MigrationSaving the original wizard, comparing properties before/after, documented event.
RecoveryPeriodic testing of the copy, measuring RTO/RPO, checking the suitability.
AccessA specific version is issued; derivatives are associated with the wizard and the terms of use.

SECTION 14

Validation of the intellectual system

AI is tested in the context of application, on data similar to real, and under continuous control after launch.

ContourMinimum check
PurposeFor what task the model is permissible; what solutions are prohibited to it.
DataOrigin, licenses, quality, cuts, leaks, representativeness.
Basic levelComparison with a person, rule, or simpler system.
QualityAccuracy, completeness, calibration of confidence, errors by type of object.
ResilienceNoise, incomplete inputs, rare cases, format change, attacks.
FairnessDifferences in errors by relevant groups and languages; damage assessment.
ExplanatoryThe sources, model version, confidence and withdrawal limits are shown.
PersonCritical findings are confirmed; disagreement and reason persist.
MonitoringDrift, incidents, complaints, stop thresholds, revalidation.

SECTION 15

Independence, competence and conflict of interest

The power of imprisonment depends not only on the method, but also on who had the right to apply it and make a decision.

RoleResponsibilityLimitation
Approval holderFormulate the goal and provide evidence.It does not make an independent decision.
Verification operatorIt uses the method, records observations and deviations.Does not change the criteria after the result.
Profile expertInterprets data and evaluates scientific sufficiency.Declares competence and conflict.
VerifierIndependently verifies the claim and material evidence.Did not participate in the creation of the verifiable result.
Scheme owner VALApproves methods, levels, forms and qualifications.Does not interfere with a single decision without a protocol.
The Appeals CommissionConsiders the dispute, new evidence and procedural violations.Organizational separation from the primary solution.

SECTION 16

Minimum set of forms and magazines

The tool is considered to be implemented only after the owner, form, record and revision procedure.

CodeFormKey fields
F-VAL-01Application for validationApproval, purpose, risk, required period.
F-VAL-02Verification planMethods, sampling, criteria, roles, independence.
F-VAL-03List of observationsFacts, measurements, deviations, references to evidence.
F-VAL-04ConclusionStatus, level V, limits, deadline, signature.
F-VAL-05Declaration of ConflictRelationships, interests, management measures.
F-VAL-06Protocol of disagreementExpert positions, additional checks, decision.
F-VAL-07Journal AI-solutionsModel, version, input, response, confidence, person, total.
F-VAL-08Monitoring logEvents, drift, incidents, complaints, corrective actions.
F-VAL-09Re-verification protocolTrigger, changed data/method, new status.

SECTION 17

Pilot implementation for 12 months

The pilot should check not the number of conclusions issued, but the quality of traceability and the ability to reproduce the solution.

TimeframePhaseResult
0–2DesignApprove terms, domains, V levels, critical gateways and schema owners.
3–4Methods and formsDescribe 28 tools VAL; run passport, logs and conflict of interest.
5–7Three StreamsScientific object, digital package and AI-function; at least 30 statements.
8–9Independent verificationRepeat the selection of decisions by external experts; experience an appeal.
10–11AutomationIntegrate registries, fixity, format validators, and journal AI.
12Audit and scaleVerify the remediation of evidence, errors, timing, and decision to expand.
IndicatorHow to Measure
TraceabilityThe proportion of decisions for which a full package of evidence has been restored.
ReproducibilityProportion of sample where the independent party obtained a comparable result.
CoherenceDivergence of experts by type of claim and reason.
SpeedMedian time at risk levels without reducing mandatory checks.
Quality AIThe proportion of accepted/rejected prompts and errors after human verification.
CorrigendumTerm of closure of comments and repeatability of root causes.

SECTION 18

Normative support and sources

Standards are used as the basis of design; applicability and binding are defined separately for each process.

[S1] ISO/IEC 17029:2019 — validation and verification bodies

[S2] ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — testing and calibration laboratories

[S3] ISO 14721:2025 — OAIS reference model

[S4] Library of Congress — PREMIS

[S5] W3C Recommendation — PROV-O

[S6] NIST — AI Risk Management Framework 1.0

[S7] NIST — TEVV-Athlon initial public draft notice

[S8] IETF RFC 8493 — BagIt File Packaging Format

Other published edition: VALUATION TOOLS_validation_Archive_and_Intellectual_system.pptx · Web Text +

Evidence system for academic registries, laboratories, digital archive and AI

ADOPTION

× PROOF

× COMPETENCE

× INDEPENDENCE

We check not the "object in general", but a specific statement - for a given purpose, according to fixed criteria and evidence.

REGISTER VAL-01—VAL-28

There is no universal “certificate of authenticity”

PROJECT SYSTEM

The correct solution is always limited to five parameters.

ADOPTION

What exactly is confirmed?

Solution Formula

METHOD

How was the evidence obtained?

"Adopted for..."

"Under the conditions..."

"Really before..."

"Based on..."

COMPETENCE

Who is entitled to evaluate?

DATE

At what point is the conclusion correct?

PURPOSE

For what use?

A solution without scope creates a false sense of absolute guarantee.

Four different actions, four different outcomes

A SINGLE WORD

TEST

VALIDATION

VERIFICATION

CERTIFICATION

measures a property or characteristic

Evaluate the likelihood for future application

Confirms the truth of what has already been stated

Confirms compliance with the requirements

RESULT

RESULT

RESULT

RESULT

Test report

Conclusion on suitability

Conformity of Facts

certificate in the established scheme

Accreditation assesses the competence of a body or laboratory - it does not replace the verification of a specific object.

Validation object — verifiable statement

PROJECT SYSTEM

OBJECT

ADOPTION

PURPOSE

CRITERIA

PROOF

DECISION

document, sample, data, model

What is Considered Faithful

What decision will be made

What is considered sufficient

What records confirm the conclusion

status, restrictions, term

Example:

It is not "the manuscript is authentic", but: "the manuscript was created no later than 1954 and is suitable as a source for publishing the catalog, while maintaining the specified restrictions."

Eight Validation Domains

PROJECT SYSTEM

IDENTITY

ORIGIN

It's not a substitute.

Where, by whom, and when it was delivered

SCIENTIFIC JUSTIFICATION

METROLOGY

method, sampling, reproducibility

Calibration and uncertainty

DIGITAL STORAGE

RIGHTS AND ETHICS

integrity, format, recovery

grounds, restrictions, consents

AI AND DATA

EFFECT AND RELIABILITY

quality, robustness, displacement

Result for the stated purpose

Five Levels of Evidence V0-V4

INTERNAL SCALE

NOT DECLARED

SELF-VERIFICATION

INTERNAL CONTROL

INDEPENDENT EXPERTISE

RECOGNISED SCHEME

There is no verifiable basis

The author and the examiner coincide

Second role within the organization

external competent expert

Accredited or regulatory outline

The level is chosen for the decision risk. V4 is not always required; another is dangerous to issue V1 or V2 for independent confirmation.

Registry VAL: 28 tools

SINGLE NUMBERATION

VAL-01—08

ORIGIN AND SCIENCE

Identification • chain of ownership • Bibliography • Attribution • Expert opinion • Sample • statistics • Reproducibility

VAL-09—16

MEASUREMENTS AND CONSERVATION

Calibration • Uncertainty • interlaboratory comparison • Control test • fixity • Format • Transmission Package • Recovery Test

VAL-17—24

RIGHTS AND INTELLECTUAL SYSTEM

Legal Checklist • Ethics • Licenses • Data Passport • Passport Models • TEVV • Displacement and robustness • human solution

VAL-25—28

EFFECT AND MANAGEMENT

risk register • result indicators • post control • revalidation

Each code links the method, performer, evidence, version, and decision.

Validation passport — 10 required blocks

PROJECT SYSTEM

ID and version

Object and Approval

Purpose and scope

Criteria for acceptance

Methods VAL

evidence and references

Performers and Competencies

Conflicts of interest

decision, terms and conditions

events and re-checking

The passport provides traceability: from the final status to each used proof.

Eight control points

PROCESS

Application form

Scoping

PLAN

COLLECTION

Approval and purpose

Risk and Level V

criteria and methods

Evidence and Journal

EVALUATION

INDEPENDENT REVIEW

DECISION

MONITORING

sufficiency and contradictions

Second Line of Control

status and conditions

Timing and triggers of revision

The step cannot be considered complete until the record, proof and responsible role are recorded in the registry.

Critical Gateways G1-G6 and Solution Statuses

PROJECT SYSTEM

RIGHT TO WORK

ACCEPTANCE

criteria are met

IDENTITY AND ORIGIN

ACCEPTED WITH THE CONDITIONS

Limitations recorded

ACHIEVEMENT OF THE METHOD

REQUIREMENTS

INTEGRITY OF THE EVIDENCE

Further evidence is needed

CONCLUDED

INDEPENDENCE OF THE DECISION

critical gateway is not passed

FEATURES FOR THE PURPOSE

NOT APPLICABLE

Criteria outside the area

Scientific and laboratory validation

ISO/IEC 17025 AS A SUPPORT

BEGINNING

VAL-09

fix hypothesis, sample, method, criteria and analysis plan

Calibration and traceability

DURING WORK

VAL-10

calibration, control samples, environmental conditions, deviation log

Calculation of uncertainty

AFTER GETTING DATA

VAL-11

uncertainty, statistical analysis, emissions verification, repeatability

interlaboratory comparison

INDEPENDENT

VAL-12

interlaboratory comparison, peer review, reproduction of the result

Control Sample / Reference

It is not "science in general" that is validated, but the suitability of the method and result for a particular conclusion.

Digital and archival validation

INTEGRITY ≠ SUBSTANCE

ACCEPTANCE

manifest and checksum

What does Hash prove?

FORMAT

Identification and risk of obsolescence

It detects the change in bits between two checks.

But in itself does not prove the author, the date of creation, legality or meaning of the document.

PACKAGE

composition, structure, metadata

STORAGE

Replication and regular fixity-check

MIGRATION

comparison before/after and event log

RECONSTRUCTION

Test Extraction and Discovery

Minimum contour: OAIS + PREMIS + Transmission Package + Event Log + Recovery Test.

Validation of the intellectual system

TEVV + HUMAN SOLUTION

DATA

MODEL

EXPLOITATION

Origin and Licenses

Purpose and boundaries

The person confirms the conclusion

Quality Markup

metrics on target scenarios

Log Inputs and Solutions

representativeness

Robustness and displacement

Drift Monitoring

Sensitive fields

version and configuration

Stop triggers

Restrictive principle: AI does not publish canonical attribution and does not remove access restrictions without a responsible person.

Independence and distribution of roles

PROJECT SYSTEM

OWNER OF APPROVAL

formulates the purpose and provides the materials

Mandatory restrictions

EXECUTOR

Conducts a test or collects evidence

• declare conflict of interest

• not to combine critical roles

• Confirm competence

• Document dissenting opinion

• Keep Unchanged Log

EXPERT

Evaluate sufficiency and contradictions

PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE DECISION

Approves status and restrictions

REGISTRATION STORE

provides versioning and auditing

The higher the risk of a decision, the stronger should be the independence and evidence of competence.

Set of nine forms F-VAL

OPERATIONAL MINIMUM

F-VAL-01

F-VAL-02

F-VAL-03

Application and approval

Validation plan

Register of evidence

F-VAL-04

F-VAL-05

F-VAL-06

Test Sheet

Expert opinion

Declaration of Independence

F-VAL-07

F-VAL-08

F-VAL-09

Decision protocol

The corrective action plan

Monitoring and revision sheet

Forms form one chain: application → plan → evidence → evaluation → decision → monitoring.

Pilot for 12 months

DECISION ON STARTING

8–10

11–12

RULES

TRAINING

THREE CASES

INDEPENDENT REVIEW

MASSTABING

policies, roles, registers, forms

team and calibration of experts

archival, laboratory, AI

Checking solutions and gaps

Founder's Report and Decision

100%

≤ 10 days

Passports without critical gaps

Decisions with reference to evidence

AI publications without human confirmation

median period of simple case

Launch the pilot after approval of the registry owner, the authority matrix and the list of critical gateways.

Sources cited in presentation 23

  • Internal design model of the Heritage Preservation Archive, 2026.
  • ISO/IEC 17029:2019, Conformity assessment — General principles and requirements for validation and verification bodies: https://www.iso.org/standard/29352.html
  • Internal design model, 2026.
  • ISO/IEC 17029:2019: https://www.iso.org/standard/29352.html
  • ISO/IEC 17025:2017: https://www.iso.org/ISO-IEC-17025-testing-and-calibration-laboratories.html
  • Internal project model "Object of validation - verifiable statement", 2026.
  • ISO 14721:2025 OAIS: https://www.iso.org/standard/87471.html
  • PREMIS, Library of Congress: https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/index.html
  • NIST AI RMF: https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
  • Internal proof scale V0-V4. This is a design model, not an international standard.
  • Internal Registry VAL-01—VAL-28, Designed for the project, 2026.
  • W3C PROV-O: https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
  • Internal form of validation passport, 2026.
  • Internal eight-step procedure, 2026.
  • Internal model of locks G1–G6 and decision statuses, 2026.
  • Internal Registry VAL-09—VAL-12, 2026.
  • RFC 8493 BagIt: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8493
  • NIST AI RMF 1.0: https://www.nist.gov/publications/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework-ai-rmf-10
  • NIST TEVV-Athlon: https://www.nist.gov/artificial-intelligence/ai-research/tevv-athlon-framework-evaluating-ai-systems
  • Internal Registry VAL-20—VAL-24, 2026.
  • Internal Role and Independence Model, 2026.
  • Internal F-form kitVAL-01—F-VAL-09, 2026.
  • The internal plan of the pilot for 12 months and design indicators, 2026.

Published files

Technology · Full published text

A Self-Validating System Combining Nature and Technology

Source Status: Primary Document

The concept of a system that compares the declared parameters with the measurable state of the natural and technical environment.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/samovalidiruyushchayasya-prirodno-tekhnicheskaya-sistema

Open on the site

Proof of Results and Adaptive Management

Concept for ECO-PPA • Scientific and engineering version • 2026

1. Definition

A self-assembly natural-technical system is an integrated complex of natural objects, engineering modules, local energy, sensor facilities, scientific robotics, digital models and validation tools that is able to continuously measure its own state and the state of the surrounding biocenosis, record the origin and quality of data, compare the actual results with the design model, confirm or deny the effectiveness of the applied impact and automatically adjust the mode of operation.

The key difference between such a system and a conventional automated complex is that it not only performs a function, but also forms an evidence base that the function is performed correctly, with the required effect and without hidden deterioration of adjacent parameters of the natural environment.

1.1. The Central Principle

THE SYSTEM DOES NOT JUST WORK — IT PROVES IT WORKS RIGHT.

2. Closed self-validation cycle

StageFunctionContents
1ObservationContinuous collection of data on the natural and technical environment
2Measurementbinding to a metrologically controlled measurement chain
3Status identificationrecognition of deviations, risks and causal factors
4Digital twinupdating the model of the object and biocenosis
5ForecastCalculation of inaction scenarios and impact options
6Impactmanagement of energy, eco-modules and robotic mechanisms
7Control measurementRe-observation after exposure
8Verificationverification of data, algorithms and calculation procedures
9ValidationProof of actual effect and limits of applicability
10Correctionchange of mode and cycle repetition
11Archive of evidenceaccumulation of decision history, data and results

3. System architecture

Natural layer

atmosphere, water, soil, vegetation, animals, microorganisms, man, technogenic load

Energy layer

minigeneration, drives, micro network, redundancy, critical load management

Technological layer

eco-modules for cleaning, restoration and processing of natural and technical flows

Measuring layer

sensors, laboratory tools, reference devices, calibration tools

Robotic layer

UAVs, ground robots, underwater vehicles, manipulators and autonomous stations

Intelligent layer

digital twin, models, engineering AI, forecasting, optimization

Proof layer

metrology, V&V, data origin control, independent effect assessment

Management layer

modes, tolerances, scenarios, risks, decision logs, pilots and scaling

4. Natural contour and biocenoses

The unit of management is not a separate pollutant or a separate installation, but a connected natural and technical complex. Therefore, any impact is evaluated according to a system of interdependent parameters.

LayerControlled parameters
Atmospheretemperature, humidity, aerosols, gases, dust, local circulation
Waterhydrochemistry, microbiology, current, biogenic elements, bottom sediments
Soilstructure, humidity, pH, organic matter, pollutants, microbiome
Plantsspecies composition, stress, phenology, productivity
Animalsnumber, routes, indicator types
MicroorganismsBiological activity and reaction to exposure
Personexposure, environmental quality, microclimate, noise, access to resources
Technogenic loadenergy, transport, emissions, discharges, waste, physical effects

5. Minigeneration and energy autonomy

The energy circuit ensures the independence of measurements, communication, robotics and critical processes from external infrastructure. The composition may include solar, wind, gas, biogas and other local sources, storage devices, micro-network and intelligent load management.

• energy sensors, communication and computing node;

• supply of pumps, aeration, sorption, membrane and other ecomodules;

• charge of robotic platforms;

• reservation of critical functions;

• Autonomous operation mode in case of violation of external power supply.

6. Ecomodules as an executive circuit

CodePurposeMandatory exit
WATERcleaning, after-treatment and water circulationMeasurable result + digital passport + validation protocol
AIRair purification and microclimate managementMeasurable result + digital passport + validation protocol
SOILsoil restoration and remediationMeasurable result + digital passport + validation protocol
BIObiofiltration, bioreactors, microbiological processesMeasurable result + digital passport + validation protocol
WASTEmanagement of individual waste and secondary resource flowsMeasurable result + digital passport + validation protocol
LABField analysis and sample preparationMeasurable result + digital passport + validation protocol
DATAlocal computing and communication nodeMeasurable result + digital passport + validation protocol

7. Scientific Robotics

A robotic platform is considered simultaneously as a means of delivery, a measuring device, an executive mechanism and a carrier of evidence. For each mission, coordinates, trajectory, orientation, sensor status, software version, calibration, environment conditions, and processing algorithms are recorded.

UAVs: aerial photography, multispectral observation, thermal control, gas analysis

Ground robots: mapping, sampling, inspection, local impacts

Submarines: hydrochemistry, bathymetry, bottom sediments, structural inspection

Manipulators: automated work with samples and laboratory procedures

Autonomous stations: long series of observations and automatic data transmission

Impact robots: aeration, dosing, administration of sorbent or biologic, cleaning

8. The Digital Double

The digital twin combines a model of biocenosis, engineering modules, energy, robots and a measurement network. It serves not as a visualization, but as a computational core that allows you to predict the effect, compare scenarios and choose the mode of impact with minimal risk.

• structure and configuration of the object;

• geospatial model of the territory;

• time series of natural and technical parameters;

• equipment status and residual life;

• model of cause-effect relationships;

• risk and limitation model;

• impact scenarios and effect prediction;

• history of validation and validated modes.

9. The contour of self-validation

The validation circuit answers three basic questions: whether it is measured correctly; whether it is interpreted correctly; whether the technological impact has been proven to have produced the desired result.

ToolWhat is being checkedResult
Metrologycalibration, traceability, uncertaintyTrusted Status / Remarks / Limits of Applicability
Data controlcompleteness, synchronization, emissions, duplicates, originTrusted Status / Remarks / Limits of Applicability
V&V modelsComparison of model with experiment and independent dataTrusted Status / Remarks / Limits of Applicability
Validation of effectbefore/after, control area, seasonality, causalityTrusted Status / Remarks / Limits of Applicability
Algorithms controlversion, stability, drift, change logTrusted Status / Remarks / Limits of Applicability
Independent verificationSeparation of developer, operator and validatorTrusted Status / Remarks / Limits of Applicability
The Evidence Archivesource data, protocols, graphs, certificates, solutionsTrusted Status / Remarks / Limits of Applicability

10. Material contour: ceramics and synthetic crystals

The physical reliability of a self-driving system depends directly on the materials. As a strategic basis, a two-circuit model is proposed: technical and functional ceramics + synthetic crystals.

MaterialFunction in the system
Ceramics Al₂O₃, ZrO₂, SiChousings, insulators, wear-resistant parts, chemical resistant elements
Leukosapphire / synthetic corundumoptical windows, protective elements, high-temperature sensors
Synthetic Diamondheat sink, wear-resistant surfaces, sensorics
Lithium Niobath LiNbO₃piezosensors, acoustic optics, vibration diagnostics
YAG / IAGlaser diagnostics, spectroscopy, lidar
GGG / GGGphotonics, magneto-optics, substrates
Synthetic Quartzresonators, frequency stabilization, metrology
SiC / GaNpower electronics minigeneration and compact converters

11. Digital element passport

• identifier of object, module, robot, sensor and material;

• owner, operator and responsible scientific center;

• geography and operating conditions;

• software package and version;

• calibrations and intercalibration intervals;

• materials and manufacturing parameters;

• processing algorithms and model versions;

• origin of the original data;

• repairs, failures and incidents;

• validation status and evidence base.

12. Automated Decision Logic

StateAction
NormaThe system continues to monitor
Warningincreases the frequency of measurements and runs additional diagnostics
DeviationDigital double forms a set of impact scenarios
Impactthe selected scenario is implemented by eco-modules and robots
VerificationA series of control measurements
Unproven effectmode is rejected or adjusted
Confirmed effectthe mode is fixed as validated and can be repeated
Risk of collateral damagesystem stops or limits the impact

13. Pilot of a self-driving system

1. The choice of territory and the definition of the boundaries of the natural and technical system.

2. Basic diagnostics and biocenosis map.

3. Deploying measurement network and control points.

4. Installation of mini-generation and eco-modules.

5. Connection of ground, air and, if necessary, underwater robots.

6. Formation of digital twins and digital passports.

7. Accumulation of the background time series before exposure.

8. The first managed impact.

9. Control measurements and independent V&V.

10. Correction of regimes.

11. Repeated cycle and confirmation of the stability of the result.

12. Preparation of a passport of replication.

14. KPI systems

IndicatorMeaning
Environmental effectimprovement of targets without deterioration of related
Energy autonomybattery life and critical load share
Reliability of dataProportion of data with traceable origin and quality control
Proportion of decisions validatedpercentage of regimes that have confirmed the effect
Robotic coatingProportion of territory and operations carried out autonomously
ReliabilityAvailability of equipment, MTBF, MTTR
Resourcedegradation of nodes and residual resource
ReproducibilityRepeatability of the result on another object
Economyunit of confirmed effect
SecurityNumber of environmental and emergency events

15. Scientific and institutional roles

Scientific integrator: methodology, models, research program

Engineering integrator: architecture, reliability, life cycle

Metrological Center: Calibration and Measuring Traceability

Operator of the territory: operation and safety

Technology developers: ecomodules, energy, robotics, software

Data center: digital double, knowledge graph, archive

Independent validator: confirmation of effect and limits of applicability

16. Communication with IMASH RAS

IMASH RAS can act as a key scientific and engineering center for mechanical, mechatronic and robotic components of the system: resource and reliability, vibration, dynamics, mechanisms, actuators, pumps, robotic platforms, digital twins and V&V engineering models.

17. The Patent Perspective

Patentability can be focused not in a general term, but in a specific architecture and method of work: a closed cycle of autonomous observation, choice of impact, its robotic execution and automatic evidential validation of the result.

• self-validating natural and technical system of biocenosis management;

• method of automatic validation of environmental impact on control zones and digital twin;

• robotic eco-module with automatic formation of evidence base;

• digital passport of the natural-technical system with traceability of measurements and solutions;

• crystal ceramic sensor node for autonomous biocenous monitoring.

18. Final formula

OBSERVE → UNDERSTAND → FORECAST → TO AIR → TO PROVE → ADJECT

A self-sustaining natural and technical system transforms an ecological and engineering object from a passive set of equipment into an adaptive scientific and technological environment capable not only of managing the process, but also of constantly confirming the quality of its own solutions.

Published files

Technology · Full published text

BASIS. Soil Modifier

Source Status: Primary Document

A presentation of the BASIS soil modifier for road bases: stabilisation technology, application procedure and claimed benefits. Technical and economic indicators are reproduced from the source.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/basis-modifikator-grunta

Open on the site

Soil Modifier

Reduction of construction costs

New Roads and Grounds

Reduction of construction time

Reducing the cost of regeneration

Increased lifetime

Roads and grounds

Cost reduction

for road maintenance

Technology of construction of roads and bases

The method of strengthening and stabilizing the soil was developed in the 60-ies of the twentieth century, and has been actively used in the world since the late 1990-ies.

The advantage of technology

before the traditional technologies of road construction and foundations are:

  • • Budget savings from 30 to 70%.
  • • Reduced time for road construction (1 standard)

The brigade makes at least 4 thousand m2 per day).

  • • Use of local soil.
  • • Use of man-made soils.
  • • High quality, reliability and durability

roads and grounds created.

  • • Ability to use in extreme regions.
  • • Increase in interrepair periods.
  • • Reduced operating costs.

MODIFICATION DESCRIPTION

Modifier is a mixture of components to improve the physical

mechanical properties of the mixture reinforced with inorganic binders.

Aggregate condition: fine dispersion powder

Modifier changes the physical and chemical properties of cement

at the molecular level, forming needle-like crystalline bonds.

This creates a strong, elastic, wear-resistant

and waterproof roadway.

When the base of the road

Mix in place:

  • • soil (90% - 94%)
  • • cement (6% - 10%)
  • • MODIFICATOR (0,4% - 0,6%)

As a result, a powerful waterproof monolithic plate is formed.

Important! The basis of the mixture is any, even the most complex soil (supes, loams, man-made soils, etc.).

Modifier Properties

High speed Low cost Long term

the Application of Operation

The product is used in construction not only with existing soil

(sand, soup, loam), but can also be applied on the basis of man-made soils: screening of granite rubble, dolomite, concrete granulate, etc.

The uniqueness of our product made it possible to associate it with granulate

(sweeping) scrap of reinforced concrete, the slag of metallurgical.

Modifier Properties

01 02 03 04

Reduction of deadlines

Use

Construction Temperature

Quick set of standard road

in comparison of operation of characteristics. equipment and soil- with traditional -60+90 °C.

mixing equipment.

methods.

05 06 07 08

Convenient Does not contain

Environmentally High Durability

in the application of solvents, and fire-safe. to UV radiation.

and transportation. non-toxic.

AVAILABLE CONDITIONS FOR THE WORK

Work can be done during

A small, drizzling rain

FROM -5 C To 60 C

Air temperature

PERFORMANCE PROCEDURE

Preliminary Distribution Distribution Mixture. (ground

Moisturizing

alignment of the binder modifier of the cutter / recycler)

Preliminary Additional Final Asphalt Application (not

sealing planning sealing care is required)

Dnyach

One of the popular soil modifiers p t

In the world is the Dutch RoadCem Strengths of PowerCem:

  • 1. Long-term experience:

PowerCem has been in the market since 1996, which confirms

Reliability and stability.

  • 2. International cooperation:

Active cooperation with leading international organizations, such as

as UNESCO, allows us to integrate world achievements into our solutions.

  • 3. Scientific partnerships:

Cooperation with universities such as TU Delft provides

access to the latest research and innovative technologies in the field of road building materials.

A UNESCO study on RoadCem technology estimates that:

that savings of more than 75% can easily be achieved over a twenty-year period compared with conventional motorway design.

And in page 8 with road cem under slogan

Comparison of soil modifiers

RoadCem and BASIS

BASIS bypasses RoadCem on a number of key indicators,

is a powerful domestic development that contributes to the development and improvement of import substitution in road construction.

Compressive strengthPr vodchnoassitnyi nnnao ms zhosattoiyani and 2 8 s t,

Mpa

in water-saturated state 28 days, MPa

Bending strengthP vr vodchnosatisfying nnromi siosztgoiyanbiyi 2 8 with t,

the MoPnassed 5,26 Status 28 day, MPa 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

BASIS RoadCem

*Based on the technical opinion of SE "BeldorNII"

Modifier Research

When using the modifier

compressive strength increases by more than 2,5 times.

Compression strength, MPa

Soil + Cement + MODIFICATOR

(6,5 kg/m3)

When using the modifier

in the soil cement is formed needle 12,0 MPa 4,15 MPa three-dimensional crystal lattice, significantly increasing

NO MODIFICATOR WITH MODIFICATOR

strength of ground concrete.

MODIFICATOR Comparison of methods

Example: road length 1 km,

REDUCE:

width 7,5 m > 5 the Traditional Diesel Fuel Consumption Method.

115

In 2-4 times 1300 BASIS

Tons of Trucks Earthworks.

Exported

>2500 Materials from 3 to 10 tons of >7000

New

Number of inert litres of materials

materials.

Consumption

Diesel Fuel

In 2-3 times 7,5

days

Time Costs Trucks

to build the road. Time 0 tons of work

Exported

1,5-3 times materials

170 tons

The need for car

1200 New materials

Reduction of Liters

From 3 to 7 times

Cost Consumption

Diesel Fuel

Operating costs

on 20-30% roads.

3-5 days

Time

the Works

AREAS OF APPLICATION

Road construction: Surface and volumetric

construction of ground-cement roads of II-V categories, strengthening of all types of soils:

the bases of roads of I-IV categories in various roads (road, pedestrian, railway), climatic zones.

Parking lots, waste storage areas

Aerodrome construction, Creating a ballast-free prism

construction of helipads, underground runways

Coastal protection Landscape design

REPAIR OF OLD ROAD CLOTHING

Long-term use of traditional road clothing causes

Irreversible changes in the upper and lower layers of the base, such as diffusion, moisture and cracking.

These processes reduce the bearing capacity of the structure, leading to

to deformation of the base and destruction of the upper layer of the coating.

To solve this problem, use a modifier

"BASIS" allows you to convert worn road clothes into a monolithic hydrophobic plate with high performance.

It improves moisture resistance and frost resistance, reduces

cracking and protects the upper layer from damage, thereby extending the period of maintenance-free operation of roads.

FEATURES

Export substitution

VERY simple and cheap repair

MODIFICATOR manufactured by this technology

grounds and roads.

High durability of the coating. Maximum use Up to 10 years without repair. local (local) soil.

Rapid pace of construction. Compliance with GOST 23558-94 For 1 working day is laid and GOST 30491-2012.

up to 1 km of road with width 7,5 m

No need

Low cost of the road.

Substitution of soil

ADVANTAGES OF THE MODIFICATOR

Strength and modulus of elasticity:

  • - Limit of compressive strength and module

Humidity: The upper part of the earthen web has elasticity 2,5-3 times higher than that of the soils

lower humidity compared to traditional grain materials.

- Bending strength is 1,7 times higher.

Maintaining evenness: Prolonged flatness

Ground pressure: Ground pressure

coatings in frosty plunging of soils, the superiority of the earthen web on fortified areas up to 5 times compared to the sand frost-protective layer.

almost 3 times less.

Thickness reduction: Total road thickness

Clothing can be reduced by 20-50%. Effect on deformation: Reducing force exposure reduces the likelihood of reducing material consumption:

Local plastic deformations.

Reduction of mineral consumption

materials (gravel, sand) on 15-45%.

Savings on transportation:

Mixing Prevention: Completely Excludes - Substantial Cost Reduction

mixing of the base material with the lower layers. transportation 1,3-1,5 times.

Seal: Improves upper sealing conditions

Performance characteristics:

layers and provides high surface smoothness.

  • - Increase in repair time.
  • - Reduced operating costs

Bends: The bends of the road are 1,3-3,2 times smaller.

for road maintenance.

On roads with good level coverage, the number of accidents is 1,5-2 times lower,

than on roads with satisfactory evenness.

"Belchromit" LLC

Telegram Whatsapp

belchromit@gmail.com

Published files

Technology · Full published text

BASIS. Modifier for Construction Using Concrete Granulate

Source Status: Primary Document

A presentation of the BASIS modifier for reusing concrete waste in roads and industrial sites. It describes the technology for binding granulate and the claimed properties of the base.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/basis-modifikator-betonnogo-granulyata

Open on the site

modifier for construction of concrete granulate

Uniqueness of development

The uniqueness of the development of the BASIS modifier is

in the use of scrap concrete waste and concrete pellet bonding for the construction of durable highways and production sites.

Innovation:

MAIN FEATURE:

UTILIZATION OF CONCRETE LOAM

improves the physical and mechanical properties of concrete granulate in the layers of road clothing changes the structure of the plate by forming a dense crystal structure, which ensures reliable binding of the main material, filling voids and micro-armament.

Characteristics of received

Grounds of road:

modulus of elasticity > 2600 MPa frost resistance not less F50 Enhanced (possibly increased to 200) Concrete Granulate Filtration Factor <0,005 (It is waterproof)

Soil

compressive strength >12,5 MPa (possible increase to 30)

Compression strength in water saturated

Status > 11,0 MPa Career road: Highway: Sidewalks:

~40 cm 20-25 cm 12-15 cm

Advantages of monolithic road slab,

built using the BASIS modifier:

does not need the device of seams does not require protection asphalt concrete coating does not become slippery during rain, providing the necessary coefficient of adhesion of the wheels with the road surface is not afraid of water saturation As a result:

? increase the overhaul time ? significantly reduce operating costs ? maintain smooth road for a long time ? reduce accidents

BASIS

WE TRANSFER WASTE TO INCOME

BASIS

Reduction of use

Recycling Savings Savings

the Inert Concrete Scrap Budget Ecology Materials Construction

COMPOSITION OF ROAD

BASIS:

Concretegranulate - 1500kg

Cement - 10-12,5%

BASIS - 6,5kg

During the construction of the road base

with the use of the BASIS modifier, particles of concrete granulate ranging in size from 0,5mm to 5mm are used.

Prospects for the use of modifiers

the Construction Industry

Tests were conducted at a research institute using a modifier

"BASIS" and waste granite and dolomite (limestone) screening, on dusty sands, as well as on concrete granulate with the use of the modifier "BASIS-P".

Granite screening: Dolomite Dusty sand: Concrete screening with

drop-out strength (limestone): strength on BASIS-P:

compression 5,7 MPa compression 11,9 MPa compressive strength 6,8 MPa compression 12,7 MPa

Four-axle dump truck = 500 t

Base made of scrap

concrete + cement+ BASIS-P = withstands axle load 125 t

Method of mixing in the solution-concrete node (RBU)

Delivery of the mixture to the object

Distribution of the mixture at the facility

1 Asphalt Layer

Preparation of a mixture in RBU

BASIS or dump trucks and grader

BETONNOGRA CEMENT

8 ZERO

Asphalt application 4

Pre-sealing

(not required)

Watering Planning

Final Seal

Areas of application:

  • 1. Urban and rural
  • 2. Bicycle paths and sidewalks 3. The base under the railway track

roads, parking

  • 5. Helicopter sites,
  • 4. Factory, warehouse
  • 6. Port areas

Ground Runway

Areas of application:

  • 7. Highways 8. Temporary roads 9. TBO Polygons
  • 10. Hydrotechnical 11. Livestock 12. Courtyards

facilities and industrial complexes and sports grounds

Modifier "BASIS"

in concrete production

Production of concrete products and blocks

from concrete granulate using the BASIS modifier by moisture-thermal treatment.

Characteristics of the resulting concrete product:

elasticity module > 2400 MPa;

frost resistance F 100;

compressive strength >12,3 MPa (possible increase to 30);

compressive strength in a water-saturated state > 11,7 MPa;

bending strength > 3,5 MPa.

Areas of application:

Blocks are designed for foundations, walls

basements and technical underground buildings;

Plates of tape foundations;

Elements of road construction

and fences. Fences and foundations;

Various wall blocks and panels;

Concrete wall stones.

They are built of:

Private houses

Apartment buildings

Public buildings

Non-residential buildings

BASIS

WE TRANSFER WASTE TO INCOME

Telegram Whatsapp

belchromit@gmail.com

Published files

Technology · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM Hyperloops and High-Speed Systems

Source Status: Primary Document

The material describes the proposed national architecture of ultra-high-speed transport.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/giperlupy-i-skorostnye-sistemy-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Concept for scientific, technological, industrial and infrastructure policy of the Russian Federation

2026

1. Summary of the initiative

As part of the direction "EQUILIBRIUM Transport" it is proposed to form a national outline of research, testing, standardization and phased introduction of high-speed and ultra-high-speed transport systems. The outline should combine high-speed rail, magneto-levation transport, Hyperloop-type vacuum-tube systems, automated freight corridors, and digital multimodal flow control.

  • HSR is a basic mature class for high-density main passenger corridors.
  • Maglev is a promising class for speeds above traditional rail transport and special corridors.
  • Hyperloop/vacuum tube systems are an experimental class requiring long-term validation of safety, tightness, evacuation, economics, and regulatory frameworks.
  • Automated cargo corridors are an applied class for ports, industrial agglomerations, dry ports and distribution centers.
  • EQUILIBRIUM is the digital contour of technology matching, flow management, digital twins and life cycle assessment.

2. State statement of the task

The development of ultra-high-speed transport is considered not as a separate infrastructure project, but as an inter-industry program that affects industry, materials science, energy, spatial development, digital economy, transport engineering and scientific and technological sovereignty.

2.1. Objectives

  • reducing the time of movement between key agglomerations and production centers;
  • increasing the connectivity of territories and redistribution of part of passenger traffic from aviation and automobile destinations;
  • creation of new markets for domestic engineering, electronics, composites, power energy and control systems;
  • formation of a test and regulatory framework for ultra-high speed technologies;
  • creation of an exported complex of technologies, standards, digital platforms and engineering competencies.

3. Classification of speed systems

ClassSpeed Range*Technological maturityRational area of application
High-speed railwayto ~200–250 km/hHighModernization of existing corridors
High Speed Railway (HSR)~250–400 km/hHighInter-Agglomeration Passenger Corridors
Magneto-levation system (maglev)~400–600+ km/hAverage/high by individual decisionsSpecialized high-density corridors
Vacuum-tube system / Hyperloop-typethe target range can exceed 600 km/hExperimentalR & D, polygons, limited demonstration lines
Automated freight corridorDepends on technologyHigh for individual solutionsPorts, terminals, industrial zones, logistics hubs

* Ranges are given as an indicative engineering classification; the parameters of a particular project are determined by the track, rolling stock, regulations and safety requirements.

4. Hyperloop and vacuum tube transport

Hyperloop is a class of transport systems in which a capsule or train moves within a pipeline/tunnel channel with significantly reduced air pressure, and movement and retention can be provided by electromagnetic or other systems. The potential reduction in aerodynamic drag creates the prerequisites for very high speeds, but at the same time forms a new set of safety and operational requirements.

4.1. Critical engineering tasks

  • long-term maintenance of a thin environment on extended areas;
  • sealing of locks, stations, joints and technological inputs;
  • safe braking and stopping in case of failures;
  • evacuation of passengers from a closed channel;
  • fire safety and smoke/gas management;
  • thermal deformation of extended pipe structures;
  • accuracy of the geometry of the track and stability of the base;
  • control of vibrations, capsule dynamics and transition modes;
  • economically acceptable construction, repair and inspection.

5. Maglev and high-speed railway

5.1. Maglev

Magneto-levitation transport eliminates the mechanical contact of the wheel and rail in the main driving mode. This reduces a number of types of mechanical wear and allows the design of systems for high speeds, but requires specialized infrastructure, power electronics, levitation and traction systems, accurate track construction and advanced safety management.

5.2. VSM

The high-speed railway is the most mature class of land passenger transport for speeds of about 250–400 km / h. For Russia, HSR can serve as a technological and infrastructure base on which competencies are formed along the way, rolling stock, traction power supply, digital dispatching, aerodynamics, materials and high-speed operation.

6. Materials science for ultra-high-speed transport

TaskPriority materials/technologyTarget effect
Reduction of massaluminum and titanium alloys, coal and glass compositesless energy consumption, higher dynamics
Depreciation and resourceceramics, ceramics, functional coatingsgrowth of interrepair resource
Thermal stabilityheat-resistant alloys, ceramic materials, heat-trapping structuresStability at high loads
Vacuum tightnessspecial steels, aluminum alloys, seals, barrier coatingsreduction of leaks and operating costs
Power Electronicshigh purity materials, ceramic substrates, dielectricsEfficiency and reliability of converters
The base of the routegeomaterials, soil stabilization, high-resource concretesgeometric stability and reduction of repair

Of particular interest for transport systems are ultra-pure oxide materials, nanostructured ceramics, new dielectrics and thermally conductive components for power electronics, sensors, insulation and wear-resistant units. Their use should be confirmed by testing in a particular product and calculating the cost of the life cycle.

7. Energy Contour

High-speed systems require an assessment of not only the thrust power, but also the full power of the facility: peak loads, recovery, energy storage, own infrastructure needs, redundancy, grid connection and electricity quality.

  • traction substations and intelligent load management;
  • regenerative braking and local storage devices;
  • microgrids for critical nodes and stations;
  • Uninterruptible power management, communication and security systems;
  • for vacuum systems - a separate balance of power consumption of vacuum pumping stations and sealing.

8. Digital architecture "EQUILIBRIUM Speed"

The digital circuit should accompany the object throughout the life cycle - from the choice of the route to operation and modernization.

  1. Digital twin corridor: geology, infrastructure, energy, transport flows.
  2. Digital double of rolling stock/capsules: dynamics, temperature, vibration, resource.
  3. Predictive diagnostics of the path, tunnel/pipe, power part and safety systems.
  4. Simulation of passenger and cargo traffic, tariff scenarios and schedules.
  5. Unified register of failures, tests, certification data and design changes.
  6. Integration with "EQUILIBRIUM Transport" for multimodal routing.

9. Approach to the choice of Russian corridors

The choice of specific routes should be based on a single multi-factor model, not just the distance between cities.

CriterionWhat is evaluated
Passenger demandcurrent and forecast flow, business and tourist trips
Freight demandhigh-value, express and container cargoes
Competition for modes of transportaviation, road and conventional rail transport
Geology and climatePermafrost, seismic, soils, temperature differences, water barriers
Energyavailability of power and cost of connection
Land and urban developmentWithdrawal corridor, stations, intersections, noise/vibration
EconomyCAPEX, OPEX, Life cycle cost, socio-economic effect
Technological readinessreadiness of components, production, standards and service base

10. National Programme: Phased

StageContentsResult
I. 0–2 yearstechnological audit; list of solutions; modeling; testing standards; choice of polygonsUnified evidence base
II. 2–5 yearsscientific and test ranges; prototypes; domestic components; certification methodstechnology confirmation
III. 5–10 yearsdemonstration lines and limited commercial areas for mature solutionsoperational experience
IV. 10+ yearsscaling of economically confirmed systems along selected corridorsNational Network of the New Generation

11. Industrial cooperation

  • transport engineering and wagon building;
  • metallurgy, aluminum, titanium and composite industries;
  • electrical engineering, power electronics and electric drive;
  • vacuum technology and sealed systems;
  • construction materials, bridge and tunnel technologies;
  • communication, navigation, sensorics, automation and AI;
  • testing centers, metrology, certification and risk insurance;
  • universities, industrial research institutes and engineering centers.

12. Security and regulatory framework

For new classes of transport, the key result of R&D should be not only speed but also proven safety. The regulatory system shall be developed in parallel with the tests.

  • functional safety of management systems;
  • fire and emergency safety;
  • evacuation and rescue operations;
  • electromagnetic compatibility;
  • cyber-resilience of the management infrastructure;
  • mechanical and aerodynamic safety;
  • control of materials, welded / adhesive joints and tightness;
  • Compulsory registration of incidents and independent verification of critical systems.

13. Economics and Decision Criteria

The comparison of technologies should be carried out at the full cost of the life cycle and transport result, and not at the maximum declared speed.

IndicatorContents
CAPEXtrack, ground, tunnels/estacades, stations, power engineering, depot, rolling stock
OPEXenergy, personnel, service, vacuum/path, cleaning, security, communication
Capacitypassengers or tons of cargo per hour/day
Reliabilitysystem readiness and recovery time
Cost of travelfor passenger/shipper
External effectstime, ecology, development of territories, unloading of other modes of transport
LocalizationShare of domestic value added and critical components

14. Proposed pilot "EQUILIBRIUM Speed"

It is proposed not to start with the construction of the highway, but to create a federal scientific and technological polygon, where several classes of high-speed transport will be able to undergo comparable tests.

  • section for high-speed wheel-rail technology;
  • part of the magneto-levation movement;
  • short sealed test channel for vacuum-tube technologies;
  • energy stand of traction, accumulation and recovery;
  • material science and climate block;
  • Center for Digital Twins, Diagnostics and Certification Data.

15. Organizational model

The program requires cross-sectoral coordination with division of functions: the state forms requirements and standards, science - evidence base, industry - components and production, infrastructure companies - operational requirements, independent centers - validation and certification.

  • The Programme Coordinating Council;
  • Scientific and Technical Council on High-Speed Transport Systems;
  • a unified register of technologies and readiness levels;
  • a set of standard piloting procedures and admission to pilot operation;
  • Consortium and project financing mechanism;
  • public part of reporting on civil indicators of efficiency and safety.

16. Final position

Russia has a large-scale territory, a scientific school, metallurgy, energy and transport engineering, allowing to form its own technological line of high-speed transport. The most rational strategy is to develop mature solutions and experimental platforms in parallel, without replacing engineering evidence with futurology.

"EQUILIBRIUM: Hyperloops and high-speed systems" is proposed as a super-technological architecture: a single system for choosing corridors, comparing technologies, managing R&D, materials science, energy, digital twins, testing and industrial scaling.

Annex. Priority Matrix

Area of workPriority up to 2030Priority 2030–2035Horizon after 2035
VSMConstruction and localization of componentsnetwork expansion, increasing speed and efficiencyIntegration into the multimodal network
MaglevR&D, testing, specialized pilotsdemonstration/commercial lines in a proven economyscaling on selected corridors
Hyperloop-typefundamental R&D, vacuum stands, safetypolygon and demonstration sites upon confirmation of key barrierscommercialization only with proven safety and life cycle
Automated cargo systemsPilots in ports and industrial zonesScaling corridorsUnified network of highly automated logistics
EQUILIBRIUM Speeddigital double, register, comparative methodControl of polygons and pilotsSingle digital layer of high-speed transport network

Other published edition: HYPERLUPS AND SPEED SYSTEMS EQUILIBRIUM_Hyperloops_and_speed_systems.pptx · Web Text +

National architecture of ultra-high-speed transport

Concept of scientific, technological, industrial and infrastructure policy of the Russian Federation

1. Summary of the initiative

A unified national outline of research, testing, standardization and phased implementation.

VSM

MAGLEV

HYPERLOOP

CARGO CORRIDORS

Mature class for high density main passenger corridors.

A promising class for speeds above traditional wheel-rail transport.

The experimental class: vacuum, leakproofness, evacuation, safety, and economics require an evidence base.

Automation of ports, agglomerations, dry ports and distribution centers.

EQUILIBRIUM = digital contour of technology comparison, flow management, digital twins and life cycle assessment.

2. State statement of the task

High-speed transport is not a separate construction, but an inter-industry program of technological development.

SPACE

INDUSTRY

ENERGY

SCIENCE

EXPORTS

Connectivity of agglomerations and production centers

New markets for engineering, electronics and materials

Traction, recovery, storage and sustainable networks

Test base and standards for new transport classes

Technologies, engineering competencies, standards and platforms

Purpose: to create a technological line of Russia - from mature HSR to experimental vacuum-tube systems.

3. Classification of speed systems

ClassOrientation speedTechnological maturityRole
High-speed railway160–250 km/hHighRegional linkages
VSM250–400 km/hHighInter-Agglomeration Passenger Corridors
Maglev400–600+ km/hAverageSpecial high-speed corridors
Vacuum-tube600–1000+ km/hLow/ExperimentalR & D, polygons, individual scenarios
Autonomous cargoby taskMedium-highPorts, terminals, industrial zones

Class

Orientation speed

Mature

Role

* Ranges are indicative; parameters of a particular project are determined by the track, rolling stock, standards and safety requirements.

4. Hyperloop: engineering reality

The potential for high speed arises due to the reduction of aerodynamic drag - but it is the vacuum environment that creates a new class of systemic risks.

  • Diluted environment in extended areas
  • Sealing of locks, stations and joints
  • Safe braking and stopping
  • Evacuation from a closed channel
  • Fire safety and gas environment
  • Thermal deformation of pipe structures
  • Geometry accuracy and base stability
  • Vibration and transition modes
  • Cost of construction, inspection and repair

Security and the economy first, then speed

5. HSR and maglev: two technological supports

VSM — mature base

MAGLEV - the next technological layer

• 250–400 km/h

• proven logic of long-distance transportation

• development of competencies on the way, rolling stock and traction

• database for digital dispatching and high-speed materials science

• no mechanical contact in the main mode

• potentially higher speed

• specialized infrastructure

• critical role of power electronics, levitation, control and path accuracy

Rational strategy: develop mature solutions and experimental platforms in parallel.

6. Materials science of high-speed transport

LOADING SPLOTS

COMPOSITES

KERAMICS

Aluminum, Titanium, High Strength Systems

carbon plastics, polymers, multilayer constructions

Insulators, heat-resistant and wear-resistant units

COVERAGE

ELECTRONICS

SENSORICA

Corrosion, temperature and friction protection

dielectrics, heat conductive materials, power components

materials for diagnosis, control and digital twins

Special interest: ultra-pure oxide materials and nanostructured ceramics - only after testing in a particular product and calculating the cost of the life cycle.

7. Energy Contour

Speed is not only determined by thrust. We need a balance of all the energy of the facility.

NETWORKING

TIAGA

RECUPERATION

SUPPORTERS

CRITICAL SYSTEMS

connection and reserve

Peak Power

energy return

Smoothing Peaks

UPS, communications, security

For vacuum-tube systems, a separate balance: vacuum pumps + sealing + locks + emergency power supply.

8. Digital architecture "EQUILIBRIUM Speed"

Digital twin

Corridor

Double

Rolling Stock

EQUILIBRIUM

SPEED

Predictive

Diagnostics

Tariffs and

Flows

Test Register

and refusals

Full life cycle: choice of track → design → tests → operation → modernization

9. Selection of Russian corridors

The route is chosen not by distance, but by a multi-factor model.

Passenger / cargo traffic

Number and economy of agglomerations

Geology and cost of the route

Energy infrastructure

Competition with aviation and motor transport

Industrial effect

Environmental constraints

Strategic sustainability

Export potential

Total: corridor rating + technology class + readiness stage + financing model.

10. National Programme: Phased

III

2026–2028

2027–2030

2029–2033

2032+

R&D and standards

Federal polygon

Pilot corridors

Scaling

Register of technologies, requirements, digital models

Comparable testing of HSR, maglev and vacuum systems

Pilot operation and confirmation of the economy

Industrial production and corridor network

Principle: not to build an experimental highway until the safety, technological readiness and economy at the test site are confirmed.

11. Industrial cooperation

Transport Engineering

Universities and Research Institutes

Metallurgy and Composites

SINGLE

PROGRAMME

Metrology and certification

Power Electronics

Communication, Sensory and AI

Vacuum technology

Construction and tunneling technologies

12–13. Security and Economy

SAFETY is a mandatory result of R&D

Economy - the cost of the life cycle

• functional security

• Fire and Emergency Safety

• Evacuation and rescue operations

• Electromagnetic compatibility

• cyber-resilience

• mechanical and aerodynamic safety

• Material control and tightness

• Independent verification of critical systems

Comparison of technologies should take into account:

• CAPEX tracks and infrastructure

• OPEX and power consumption

• repair and inspection costs

• passenger/cargo traffic

• Reliability and availability factor

• Key element lifetime

• cost of risks and insurance

• Effect on Industry and Territories

Not the maximum speed, but the proven transport result determines the solution.

PILOT "EQUILIBRIUM SPEED"

Federal scientific and technological polygon instead of premature construction of an experimental highway

VSM

MAGLEV

HYPERLOOP

High Speed Wheel and Rail Section

Magneto-Levitation

Short Sealed Test Channel

ENERGY

MATERIALS

DIGITAL CENTER

traction, accumulation and recovery

Climate and resource testing

doubles, diagnostics and certification data

Final position

Russia can form its own technological line of high-speed transport, if mature solutions and experimental platforms develop in parallel, and engineering evidence precedes scaling.

EQUILIBRIUM = Unified architecture of corridor selection, R&D, materials science, energy, digital twins, testing and industrial scaling.

Published files

Technology · Full published text

KOAH. Modifier for Backfilling

Source Status: Primary Document

A presentation of the KOAH modifier for a self-compacting soil mix and backfilling. The source describes preparation of the mix, placement methods and claimed material properties.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/koakh-modifikator-obratnoy-zasypki

Open on the site

modifier for backfill

COACH self-sealing ground mixture

A self-sealing ground mixture is a material that after mixing

The existing soil with the modifier "KOACH" when adding water, forms a homogeneous mass that has the property of self-condensation and hardening without the use of mechanical action.

Unlike cement-based materials,

such mixtures remain soil, maintaining or improving the characteristics of the original soil.

This technology with the use of "COACH" allows

create a new, unique base with strength, damping ability and stability better than the original soil.

Properties of COACH: features of behavior

"liquid soil" in action Simple laying.

No sealing required.

Does not damage the network, does not shrink.

Lack of swelling.

Absence of vibration, noise and dust.

reproduces the initial soil conditions,

can be re-developed manually or mechanically.

Reprocessing is possible

"liquid soil" after the strength set.

Technology of self-compacting mixture:

How does the soil become a solid base without too much effort?

It is made from the ground material of the development of trenches.

When mixing the modifier "KOACH"

with the existing soil with the addition of water, the soil material becomes temporarily fluid.

After pouring, the mixture hardens on its own,

No mechanical sealing is required.

After solidification, the resulting mass guarantees

similar or better physical properties compared to the extracted soil.

The Future of Construction:

How do innovative materials change the industry?

Self-sealing ground mix is a variable temporary fluid construction

material that can be produced from any kind of career material.

Advantages of COACH in modern construction projects

Lack of mechanical seal, which completely eliminates the risk of violation

waterproofing or other coating of foundations and other structures.

Shrinkage and vibration quenching Reduction of earthworks

High strength, water permeability and elasticity Lack of vibrations during laying, which accelerates construction

Production on site or with mobile installation Mechanical extraction capability at any time

Re-use of extracted soil Reduction of costs for laying engineering networks

Restoring the homogeneous nature of soils Constant quality control of product and technology

Technology "liquid soil":

How to ensure the durability of waterproofing

and prevent damage?

Application of "liquid soil" technology in the alternative

existing with the use of mechanical seal more effectively in close proximity to the structure or piles, and also guaranteed to protect waterproofing from damage.

Application of the self-compacting ground mixture of COACH

during the construction and repair of industrial and civil construction objects

Variant of application of the modifier "KOACH"

to create a protective casing of the laid pipelines This variant of application of technologies allows:

protect pipelines and networks of engineering communications from mechanical impact, reduce the number of drawdowns to reduce the volume of the carriageway due to the excavation being developed, the possibility of better tramping of the upper layers, eliminate the need for workers in the pit during tramping to create a thermal insulation initial layer, protect pipelines and networks, increase the service life to improve the quality of the laid communications of the work performed and reduce the operational in compliance with all OT and PB measures.

Maintenance and repair costs,

Application possibilities

Application possibilities for laying

High Voltage Electric Lines Customer Requirements:

mounting 6 x 10000 In lines no voids;

transmission with gas insulation;

appropriate heat sink ensuring appropriate (lines are heated to ≈ +70°C carrying capacity, despite the full load); to a small depth of laying pipes.

Environmental characteristics

No need to develop sand quarries

No need to bring sand for filling.

No need to dispose of excess soil.

Reuse Practically

any soil for work.

Reduction of transport operations.

No need

for sand filling, PGS, crushed stone, etc.

No risk to the environment, minimization

impact on it in the presence of harmful substances in the soil.

Use of components for GHS only

natural mineral origin.

Economic horizons:

How does COACH optimize construction costs?

Reduction

construction time.

Decrease

Earthworks.

Cost reduction

on the technique.

Cost reduction

on materials.

Extension of time

services of roads and networks.

Reduction

operating costs.

"Belchromit" LLC

Telegram Whatsapp

belchromit@gmail.com

Published files

  • COACH .pdf (PDF)
    https://speczashchita.com/documents/knowledge/koakh-modifikator-obratnoy-zasypki/source-01.pdf

Technology · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM Materials Science and Transport

Source Status: Primary Document

The concept is devoted to the technological modernization of the transport system of the Russian Federation through materials science and new transport solutions.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/materialovedenie-i-transport-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Position and concept paper

1. General

The transport system of the Russian Federation is one of the basic infrastructure systems of the state. Its effectiveness directly depends not only on the organization of transportation, digital management and network development, but also on the quality of materials from which vehicles, roads, bridges, tunnels, rail infrastructure, power plants, storage and energy transmission nodes are created.

Within the framework of the system "EQUILIBRIUM" material science is considered as one of the key technological contours of transport. It is proposed to move from the separate development of transport infrastructure and materials engineering developments to a single model in which the requirements of transport form an order for materials, and new materials change the economy, resource, security and architecture of transport.

2. Strategic objective

Formation of the national contour "Material Science - Transport", which provides an accelerated introduction of domestic materials, composites, coatings, alloys, ceramics, ultra-pure substances and functional materials into the civil, industrial and infrastructure transport system.

  • reducing dependence on critical imports of materials and components;
  • increase of transport infrastructure and rolling stock;
  • reduction of construction weight, energy consumption and life cycle cost;
  • improving safety and resistance to extreme climatic and operational loads;
  • formation of the domestic technological base of dual-use materials, infrastructure and production.

3. Materials Science as the Basis of Transport Sovereignty

Modern transport is increasingly a material-dependent industry. The competitiveness of aviation, rail transport, automotive, shipbuilding, energy transport and infrastructure construction is determined not only by the quality of the design, but also by the availability of materials with specified physical and chemical, mechanical, thermal, electrical and resource characteristics.

3.1. Priority classes of materials

  • high strength and corrosion resistant steels;
  • aluminum and magnesium alloys;
  • titanium alloys and special heat-resistant materials;
  • polymeric and carbon composites;
  • ceramic and metal ceramic materials;
  • functional coatings and systems of protection against wear and corrosion;
  • nanostructured materials and ultrapure starting materials;
  • materials for battery systems, electric transport and power electronics;
  • materials for hydrogen infrastructure and gas storage;
  • geomaterials and technologies of soil stabilization for transport construction.

4. Main transport directions

4.1. Road transport

Light body structures, high-resource parts, brake and friction materials, composites, anti-corrosion coatings, materials for batteries and electric motors.

4.2. Rail transport

New generation rail steels, wear-resistant wheel pairs, composite materials, coatings, materials for bridges, contact networks and high-speed infrastructure elements.

4.3. Air transport

High-strength aluminum and titanium alloys, composites, heat-resistant systems, ceramics, coatings, lightweight constructions and materials for electric and hybrid power plants.

4.4. Maritime and river transport

Corrosion-resistant materials, ship steels, composites, coatings, materials for Arctic operation, energy systems and port infrastructure.

4.5. City Electric Transport

Materials for batteries, power electronics, contact networks, light bodies, high-resource wheel nodes and charging infrastructure.

4.6. Pipeline and special transport

High-strength pipes, anti-corrosion coatings, materials for high pressures, low temperatures, chemically active environments and integrity monitoring.

5. Architecture "EQUILIBRIUM Materials Science — Transport"

The proposed architecture is built as a single cycle: the need for transport → Terms of Reference → scientific development → Experienced material → Validation → Certification → Pilot application → Industrial production → operational monitoring → Re-improvement.

ContourFunctionResult
Science and R&DDevelopment of new materials and technologiesMaterials with specified characteristics
Tests and validationLaboratory, bench and field testsConfirmed parameters and resource
IndustryScaling productionSerial material and component
TransportPilot and serial applicationReduction of mass, cost and accident rate
Digital monitoringCollection of operational dataResource forecast and feedback
Public administrationStandards, coordination, support measuresTechnological Sovereignty

6. Key technological projects

  • The Center for Transport Materials Science is a single platform for coordinating R&D, testing and implementation.
  • Register of critical transport materials and technologies.
  • National Library of Digital Passport Materials.
  • Digital twin life cycle of transport structures.
  • The program of import-independent materials for transport.
  • Pilot sites for full-scale testing of materials in real climatic conditions.
  • Industrial consortia on aluminum, composites, ceramics, battery materials and protective coatings.
  • System of traceability of origin, quality and resource of materials.

7. Example of a priority direction: ultra-pure and nanostructured aluminooxide products

A separate promising direction is the use of ultra-pure and nanostructured aluminum oxide products in transport engineering, electrical engineering, power electronics, protective coatings, ceramic assemblies, sensors and components operating at elevated temperatures and loads. Industrial implementation decisions require technological validation for specific transport applications, confirmation of parameters, resource, life cycle cost and readiness for serial production.

8. Soil stabilization technologies and transport infrastructure

Stabilization of soils can be considered as an independent direction of transport material science. With confirmed characteristics, such technologies can be used in the construction and reconstruction of highways, railway bases, temporary infrastructure, industrial sites and facilities in difficult geological conditions.

  • increase the bearing capacity of the base;
  • reducing the volume of soil replacement and inert materials supply;
  • reduction of construction time;
  • increasing resistance to seasonal and climatic deformations;
  • possible reduction of the carbon intensity of construction when confirmed by life cycle calculations.

9. Dual-use transport

Within the framework of the state transport policy, materials and technologies should also be evaluated according to the criteria of sustainability, maintainability, resource independence and the possibility of rapid restoration of infrastructure. We are talking about the creation of a civil industrial base capable of maintaining the performance of the transport system in emergency situations, technological limitations and increased load.

At the same time, specific defense applications, access modes and special requirements should be formed only by authorized state customers within the framework of current legislation and established procedures.

10. Economic model

  • state technological order for critical materials;
  • long-term off-take contracts of transport corporations;
  • PPP for testing and production infrastructure;
  • industrial consortia of material manufacturers and transport companies;
  • measures to support certification, localization and scaling;
  • Evaluate efficiency at full life cycle cost, not just at the purchase price.

11. System of indicators

  • share of domestic materials in critical transport segments;
  • reduction of mass of transport structures;
  • increase in interrepair resource;
  • reduction of accident rate and material failures;
  • reducing the cost of the life cycle;
  • energy efficiency and reduction of fuel/energy consumption;
  • period from laboratory development to industrial implementation;
  • volume of serial production of new materials;
  • export potential of materials and transport technologies.

12. Proposed pilot

As a pilot, it is proposed to form an inter-industry project that unites a transport company or an infrastructure customer, a material developer, a manufacturer, a test center and a digital contour "EQUILIBRIUM".

  • choose 3–5 materials science solutions with high readiness;
  • identify specific transport products or infrastructure facilities;
  • to conduct comparative tests with serial analogues;
  • calculate resource, life cycle cost and economic effect;
  • create digital passports and validation protocols;
  • Based on the results of the pilot, make a decision on serial implementation.

13. State implementation mechanism

To implement the initiative, it is proposed to form an interagency and intersectoral coordination circuit with the participation of relevant federal executive authorities, transport companies, scientific organizations, material manufacturers, test and certification centers.

  • approval of the list of critical materials and technologies;
  • development of a road map for R&D and implementation;
  • creation of a unified system of testing and validation;
  • support of pilot industrial production;
  • inclusion of confirmed solutions in procurement and industry standards;
  • scaling of successful solutions to the transport system of the Russian Federation.

14. Output expected

The link "Material Science - Transport" should become one of the mechanisms of technological sovereignty of Russia. Its result is not a separate material or transport project, but a reproducible system for creating, testing, implementing and scaling technologies.

"EQUILIBRIUM" in this model performs the function of a system architecture: connects scientific order, technology, production capacity, transport operation, life cycle data, economics and public administration into a single managed circuit.

15. Proposal

It is proposed to consider the creation of a pilot federal contour "EQUILIBRIUM: Materials Science and Transport" with the subsequent formation of a national program for the accelerated introduction of new materials and unified technologies into the transport system of the Russian Federation.

Other published edition: MATERIALS AND TRANSPORT EQUILIBRIUM_Materials_and_transport.pptx · web text +

Concept of technological modernization of the transport system of the Russian Federation

Materials → technology → transport → data → life cycle

Federal

technological contour

1. Strategic statement

Materials science is considered as the basic technological contour of transport

Transport

Materials

The State Task

Infrastructure, rolling stock, energy, repair, safety and life cycle management.

Alloys, composites, ceramics, coatings, battery materials, geomaterials.

Combine scientific order, testing, production and operation into a single reproducible cycle.

Key principle

The requirements of transport form an order for materials, and new materials change the resource, mass, energy efficiency, maintainability and cost of the life cycle of the transport system.

The result: transport sovereignty through its own technological base of materials, components and tests.

2. Priority classes of materials

Focus on areas that directly affect the resource, mass and sustainability of transport

High-strength alloys

Composites

Ceramics and coatings

Steel, aluminum, magnesium and titanium alloys.

Polymer, carbon and hybrid composite systems.

Wear-, heat- and corrosion-resistant solutions.

Energy materials

Nanomaterials

Geomaterials

Batteries, power electronics, hydrogen infrastructure.

Superpure starting materials and nanostructured products.

Stabilization of soils, bases, materials for infrastructure construction.

3. Transport application industries

A single material study circuit for different modes of transport

Lightweight constructions • Battery • Coating

Car

rails • wheel pairs • contact networks

Zheleznodorozhny

Composites • Titanium • heat-resistant systems

Aviation

ship steel • arctic materials • anticorrosion

Sea and river

batteries • power electronics • body systems

City Electric Transport

high pressure • low temperature • integrity monitoring

Special and Pipeline

4. Full-cycle architecture

From industry need to serial application and feedback

The need for transport

Terms of Reference

R & D

Tests and validation

Pilot application

Industrial production

Operational monitoring

EQUILIBRIUM connects technical requirements, test data, industrial readiness, operational statistics and life cycle economics into a single digital circuit.

5. Priority technology projects

Practical mechanisms to accelerate implementation

Center for Transport Materials Science

Register of critical materials

Coordination of R&D, testing, certification and implementation.

List of materials, technologies and risks of dependence.

Digital Passports

Pilot sites

Properties, origin, testing, resource and conditions of use.

Full-scale tests in real climatic and load modes.

Industrial consortia

Digital life cycle twin

Materials manufacturers + transport companies + science.

Residual resource forecast and repair planning.

6. Ultra-pure and nanostructured alumino oxide products

Prospective direction for transport engineering and electronics

Possible applications

What needs to be confirmed

The right way of implementation

Ceramic units, electrical insulation, power electronics, sensors, protective coatings, thermal barriers.

Stability of characteristics, resource, manufacturability, life cycle cost and readiness for serial production.

Not a declaration of properties, but validation for a specific transport product and comparison with a serial analogue.

Proposed pilot logic

Material

Detail / Node

Bench tests

Field operation

Calculation of the effect

Decision on the series

All declared technical and economic effects must be confirmed by test reports and calculations.

7. Soil stabilization and transport infrastructure

Infrastructure materials science — a separate reserve of efficiency

  • Increase the bearing capacity of roads and industrial sites.
  • Reducing the volume of soil replacement and inert materials supply.
  • Reduction of construction and repair time with confirmed technology.
  • Increased resistance to seasonal and climatic deformations.
  • Possible reduction in the carbon intensity of the life cycle - only after a calculated confirmation.

Transport applications

• roads

• Railway Bases

• Temporary infrastructure

• aerodrome and industrial sites

• difficult geological conditions

Acceptance criterion: engineering validation + life cycle cost + compliance with the standards.

8. Sustainability of the transport system and dual-use technologies

The civil industrial base should remain operational with increased load

Resilience

Resource independence

Recovery

Materials with increased resource, maintainability and work in extreme conditions.

Domestic materials, raw materials, production technologies and testing base.

Rapid restoration of transport infrastructure in case of accidents and emergencies.

State principle

Specific special and defense applications are determined only by authorized state customers within the framework of current legislation, admission regimes and established procedures.

The focus of the initiative: sustainability of the civil transport and industrial base.

9. Economic model

Funding must be associated with a proven technological effect

  • State technological order
  • Long-term off-take contracts
  • PPP for testing and production infrastructure
  • Consortiums of manufacturers and transport companies
  • Certification and localization support
  • Pilots and Pilots
  • Procurement standards after confirmation of characteristics
  • Assessment at full cost of life cycle

Principle: It is not “novelty” that is funded, but a measurable effect on transport and industry.

10. System of indicators

Pilot performance and subsequent scaling

Share of domestic materials in critical segments

increase in the interrepair period and service life

Localization

Resource

reduction of mass of structures and energy consumption

reduction of failures, defects and accidents of materials

Mass and Energy

Reliability

Life cycle cost and cumulative effect

period from R&D to pilot industrial application

Economy

Speed of implementation

volume of serial production and capacity utilization

Export potential of materials and transport technologies

Industry

Exports

11. Proposed pilot

3–5 high-readiness technologies - from testing to series decision

Selection of decisions

Object of application

Comparative tests

3–5 materials or technologies with clear transport applications.

A specific detail, node, or infrastructure object.

Comparison with the serial analogue on the same criteria.

Field operation

Economy

Decision

Test in real climatic and load conditions.

Calculation of resource, life cycle cost and effect.

Serial implementation, completion or termination of the project.

12. State implementation mechanism

Intersectoral coordination without excessive parallel management

Profiled FOV

Transport companies

Science and testing

Industry

Coordination Outline

"EQUILIBRIUM: Materials Science and Transport"

  • list of critical materials and technologies;
  • Roadmap for R&D and implementation;
  • uniform requirements for testing and validation;
  • pilot industrial production;
  • scaling of confirmed solutions.

MATERIALS + TRANSPORT

EQUILIBRIUM

Not a separate material and not a separate transport project,

a reproducible system for creating, verifying, implementing and scaling technologies.

Proposal

Create a pilot federal outline "EQUILIBRIUM: Materials Science and Transport" with the subsequent formation of a program for the accelerated introduction of new materials and unified technologies into the transport system of the Russian Federation.

Published files

PPA · Full published text

Annuity. Annuity Agreement

Source Status: Primary Document

A set of standard forms under the legislation of the Russian Federation

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/dogovor-renty-ppa-rent-framework

Open on the site

Consisting of:

1. Permanent Rent Contract

2. Contract of lifetime rent

3. Lifetime Maintenance with Dependency

The working legal model. Before signing a specific transaction, the conditions must be adapted to the object, the composition of the parties, family status, tax consequences and the requirements of the notary.

Updating the legal framework: August 2026.

Explanations for use

This set contains three separate models of the contract. Their provisions should not be mechanically combined into one contract: permanent rent, life rent and life maintenance with dependents are governed by different norms of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

The rent contract is subject to notarization. In case of alienation of real estate, the transfer of ownership is subject to state registration. A specific version of the contract and a package of documents should be previously agreed with the notary.

The square brackets [q] indicate the fields that need to be filled or replaced.

If the property is transferred under the payment of rent for a fee, the relevant rules on the purchase and sale also apply; in the case of free transfer, the rules on donation insofar as this is compatible with the nature of rent.

Form 1. Permanent Rent Contract

Mr. [?] "___" __________ 20__ g.

[First name/name], [passport/registration data], hereinafter referred to as “Agent”, on the one hand, and [First name/name], [passport/registration data], hereinafter referred to as “Agent”, on the other hand, collectively referred to as “Parties”, have concluded this Agreement.

1. Subject of the contract

1.1. The Rent Recipient transfers to the Rent Payer the property specified in paragraph 1.2 of this Agreement, and the Rent Payer undertakes to pay the Rent Recipient a permanent rent for an indefinite period on the terms of this Agreement.

1.2. Property: [detailed description of the object, address, cadastral number / identifiers of movable property, title document, area, purpose, other characteristics].

1.3. The property is transferred [for a fee of ______ rubles / free of charge].

1.4. The right of ownership of the recipient of the rent on the property is confirmed: [?]

1.5. As of the date of conclusion of the Agreement, the property [is not / is] under arrest, pledge, prohibition, dispute or other encumbrance, except: [-]

2. Amount, form and terms of rent payment

2.1. The size of the permanent rent is ________ (__________) rubles per month, but in any case not lower than the minimum level established by mandatory legislation.

2.2. The rent shall be paid [monthly/quarterly] not later than the number of the relevant period by transferring funds to the Rent Recipient's account: [bank details].

2.3. By written agreement of the Parties, the monetary payment may be fully or partially replaced by the provision of things, the performance of works or the provision of services corresponding to the cost of the established amount of rent, if this is allowed by law.

2.4. The amount of rent shall be increased in cases and in the manner expressly provided for by law. The parties may additionally establish indexation: [ICP / fixed percentage / other formula], if such a formula does not worsen the position of the Rent Recipient in comparison with the mandatory requirements of the law.

2.5. The obligation is considered fulfilled on the date of crediting of funds to the account of the Rent Recipient or on the date of signing the document confirming the proper non-monetary performance.

3. Transfer of property and state registration

3.1. Transfer of property is executed by the Act of acceptance and transfer, which is an integral part of the Agreement.

3.2. If the subject of the Agreement is real estate, the Parties shall ensure the submission of documents for state registration of the transfer of ownership in the manner prescribed by law.

3.3. Expenses for notarization and state registration shall be borne by [rent payer / Rent recipient / Parties equally / other: ).

4. Maintenance of rents

4.1. When transferring real estate, the rights of the Rent Recipient are ensured in accordance with the law, including the right of pledge for the transferred property.

4.2. If money or other movable property is transferred under the payment of rent, the Rent Payer provides the following security: [guarantee / independent guarantee / pledge / liability risk insurance / other acceptable security].

4.3. The Rent Payer is obliged to immediately notify the Rent Recipient of the loss, termination or significant deterioration of the security.

5. Rights and obligations of the parties

5.1. The rent payer is obliged to pay rent in full and on time, not to take actions aimed at concealing property from the security provided by law, and to provide documents confirming the execution.

5.2. The recipient of the rent has the right to demand proper execution, to receive supporting documents, to use the methods of protection provided for by law and the Contract.

5.3. The rent payer has the right to alienate the property encumbered by rent, only taking into account the consequences established by law, and is obliged to disclose the existing encumbrance to the acquirer.

6. Responsibility

6.1. For the delay in the payment of money, the Rent Payer shall pay interest and / or a penalty in the amount established by law and this Agreement:

6.2. The payment of sanctions does not relieve the fulfillment of the basic obligation.

6.3. The party that has violated the Agreement shall compensate the other party for documented losses in the part to be reimbursed by law.

7. Redemption of constant rent

7.1. The rent payer has the right to buy permanent rent in the cases and in the manner prescribed by law and this Agreement.

7.2. The recipient of the rent has the right to demand rent redemption in cases stipulated by law, including a significant delay, violation of security and other circumstances established by law.

7.3. The repurchase price shall be determined in accordance with the law and the terms of this Agreement: [formula/sum, if applicable].

7.4. The condition of refusal of the Rent Payer from the right to redemption for a period exceeding the limits allowed by law does not apply.

8. Assurances of the parties

8.1. Each Party shall confirm the existence of the necessary legal capacity and powers for the conclusion of the Treaty.

8.2. The recipient of the rent confirms that he acts voluntarily, understands the legal consequences of the alienation of property and is not under the influence of delusion, deception, threat or violence.

8.3. The parties confirm that they explain the legal and property consequences of the rent contract.

9. Modification and termination of the contract

9.1. Changes to the Agreement are made in the form required by law for the corresponding change.

9.2. The contract is terminated on the grounds provided by law and this Agreement.

9.3. A material breach of obligations entitles the injured Party to use legal remedies, including avoidance, annuity and damages claims, where applicable.

10. Dispute resolution

10.1. Disputes are resolved through negotiations, and if the agreement is not reached, in court in accordance with the rules of jurisdiction and jurisdiction established by the legislation of the Russian Federation.

10.2. The claim procedure shall apply if it is required by law or provided for by a separate agreement of the Parties.

11. Final provisions

11.1. The contract shall enter into force from the moment of its notarization, unless the law or the nature of the relevant legal relationship provides for another moment of occurrence of individual rights.

11.2. In terms of the transfer of the right to real estate, legal consequences arise taking into account the requirements of state registration.

11.3. Inherent applications: Act of acceptance-transfer; description of property; schedule of payments; security documents; other applications [?].

11.4. The contract is drawn up in the number of copies required for the Parties, the notary and other persons / bodies in accordance with the applicable procedure.

12. Details and signatures

Rent Recipient[Name/name] [passport/OGRN] [address] [phone/e-mail] [bank details] Signature: ____________
Rent Payer[Name/Name]
[passport/OGRN]
[address]
[phone/e-mail]
[bank details]

Signed: ____________

Form 2. Contract of lifetime rent

Mr. [?] "___" __________ 20__ g.

The [name of the citizen], referred to as the "rent recipient", and the [name], referred to as the "rent payer", have concluded this Agreement.

1. Subject of the contract

1.1. The Rent Receiver shall transfer the Rent Payer to the property: [ ], and the Rent Payer undertakes to pay the Rent Receiver periodically a lifetime rent during the life of the Rent Receiver.

1.2. If the rent is established in favor of another citizen or several citizens, indicate: [name, date of birth, share in the right to receive an rent].

1.3. The property is transferred [for a fee / free of charge].

1.4. The right to property is confirmed: [ ].

2. Amount and manner of payment

2.1. Lifetime rent is paid in cash in the amount of ________ rubles per month or in another amount allowed by law and agreed by the Parties.

2.2. If the property is transferred free of charge, the amount of the lifetime rent may not be below the statutory minimum level.

2.3. Payment shall be made at the end of each calendar month not later than [?] the date, unless another term is established by law or this Agreement.

2.4. Payments are credited to the account: [ ].

2.5. The indexation established by law is applied automatically.

3. Transfer of assets

3.1. The transfer is made by the Act of acceptance-transfer.

3.2. With real estate, the Parties shall ensure state registration of the transfer of ownership.

3.3. The costs are: [ ].

4. Security

4.1. When transferring real estate, the rights of the Rent Recipient are secured in accordance with the law.

4.2. For movable property, the Payer provides security for: [ ].

5. Rights, obligations and restrictions

5.1. The rent payer is obliged to pay rent in a timely manner and maintain the security provided by law.

5.2. The recipient of the rent has the right to demand the termination of the Agreement in case of a significant violation by the Payer of its obligations in cases provided for by law.

5.3. The death of the last Rent Recipient terminates the obligation to pay lifetime Rent.

5.4. The risk of accidental death or damage to property transferred for payment of a lifetime rent does not in itself exempt the Payer from obligations, unless otherwise directly follows from the law.

6. Liability and termination

6.1. For late payments, the Payer is liable in accordance with the law and this Agreement.

6.2. In case of a significant violation of the Agreement, the Rent Recipient has the right to use the methods of protection established by civil law, including the requirements specifically provided for lifetime rent.

6.3. The consequences of the termination are determined by the applicable rules of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and the actual conditions for the transfer of property.

7. Assurance and voluntariness

7.1. The recipient of the rent confirms that the meaning of the transaction is clear, the alienation of the property is voluntary, and the size and nature of the counter provision to them are estimated.

7.2. The renter confirms the availability of financial ability to fulfill long-term obligations.

7.3. The parties agree with the notarization of the circumstances of the transaction to the extent provided by law.

8. Disputes and final clauses

8.1. Applicable law is the legislation of the Russian Federation.

8.2. Disputes are considered by the competent court of the Russian Federation.

8.3. This Agreement is subject to notarization.

8.4. Annexes: description of the property; The act of acceptance-transfer; payment details; security documents; [other].

9. Details and signatures

Rent Recipient[Name] [passport] [address] [account] Signature: ____________
Rent Payer[Name/Name]
[passport/OGRN]
[address]
[account]

Signed: ____________

Form 3. Lifetime Maintenance with Dependency

Mr. [?] "___" __________ 20__ g.

The [name of the citizen], referred to as the "Recipient of the Contents", and the [name], referred to as the "Content Payer", have concluded this Agreement.

1. Subject of the contract

1.1. The recipient of maintenance shall transfer the real property to the Payer of maintenance: [type of object, address, cadastral number, area, assignment, basis of right], and the Payer of maintenance shall undertake to maintain the Recipient of maintenance with dependents for life.

1.2. The transfer of real estate is carried out [free of charge / for a fee of ?], taking into account the legal nature of this Agreement.

1.3. The content is provided in the scope and forms established by this Agreement, subject to a mandatory minimum level provided by law.

2. Composition and cost of maintenance

2.1. The content payer provides:

• residential premises or retains the right of residence for the Recipient in the facility under the terms of this Agreement;

• food and purchase of products in the agreed volume;

• clothes, shoes and necessary household goods;

• payment of utility and operating costs in the agreed part;

• care, household assistance and support;

• payment of medicines and medical services in the agreed amount, if such expenses are not covered by other sources;

• if necessary - organization of ritual services within the agreed cost;

• other services: [?].

2.2. The total cost of maintenance per month is estimated by the Parties at ________ rubles, but cannot be lower than the minimum amount established by law.

2.3. The parties shall confirm the performance: checks, receipts, bank documents, acts of rendered services, electronic performance journal or other evidence.

2.4. By agreement of the Parties, the in-kind content may be completely or partially replaced by periodic cash payments, if such replacement is allowed by law and is directly formalized.

3. Right of residence and use

3.1. The recipient retains the right to live for life in the [object/part of the object]: [?], unless otherwise follows from the agreed model of the transaction.

3.2. The payer of the content shall not have the right to create obstacles to the lawful residence and use of the Recipient of the content.

3.3. The procedure for access by third parties, repair, use of common premises and payment of expenses: [?].

4. Real estate management

4.1. The payer of maintenance has the right to alienate, pledge or otherwise encumber real estate only if the restrictions established by law for life maintenance with dependents are observed.

4.2. The recipient of the content consents to legally significant actions only in the form and cases where such consent is required by law.

4.3. The payer is obliged to take measures that exclude a decrease in the value of the property due to improper treatment of it.

5. Procedure for performance of duties

5.1. No later than [b] of the number of the Parties may sign the Act of performance of maintenance duties.

5.2. Refusal to sign the Act does not automatically mean the absence of execution; each Party has the right to confirm the circumstances with other admissible evidence.

5.3. Emergency expenses exceeding ______ rubles are agreed in advance, except in cases of threat to the life and health of the Recipient.

6. Substantial breach and termination

6.1. A significant violation may be recognized as a systematic failure to provide maintenance, long delays in mandatory payments, obstruction of residence, cruel or degrading treatment, as well as other violations that under the law and circumstances of the transaction give grounds for termination.

6.2. In case of a significant violation by the Payer of its obligations, the Recipient of the content has the right to demand the return of real estate or payment of the redemption price in cases and in the manner prescribed by law.

6.3. The specific consequences of termination shall be determined by law, the terms of the Agreement and a judicial act or agreement of the Parties, if it is permissible.

7. Additional guarantees

7.1. At the request of the Parties, a trusted contact person of the Recipient of the Content may be appointed: [Name, telephone], who is entitled to receive notifications, but does not replace the Recipient in the exercise of his rights without proper authority.

7.2. The parties may provide insurance of property, civil liability and other risks: [-].

7.3. All cash expenses are recommended to be carried out non-cash or confirmed by primary documents.

8. Personal data and privacy

8.1. The parties process personal data only to the extent necessary for the conclusion and execution of the Agreement, notarization, state registration and protection of rights.

8.2. Medical information is disclosed only to the extent necessary for the performance of a specific duty and if there is a legal basis.

9. Disputes and final clauses

9.1. The agreement is governed by the legislation of the Russian Federation.

9.2. The contract is subject to notarization.

9.3. The transfer of ownership of real estate is subject to state registration.

9.4. Applications: description of the object; Act of acceptance-transfer; list of services and their cost standard; schedule/register of care; payment details; consents and other documents.

10. Details and signatures

Recipient of Content[Name] [passport] [address] [account] Signature: ____________
The Maintenance Payer[Name/Name]
[passport/OGRN]
[address]
[account]

Signed: ____________

Annex 1. Act of acceptance and transfer of property

to the [permanent / life annuity / life maintenance with dependent] contract from "___" _________ 20 _____

1. The receiver handed over, and the Payer accepted the property: [full description].

2. Status of property at date of transfer: [ ].

3. Documents and supplies are provided: [ ].

4. Claims by status/completeness: [no/available: ].

5. This Act is made in [ ] copies.

Translated[Name] Signature: ____________
Accepted[Name/Name]
Signed: ____________

Annex 2. Object card and transactions

Type of contract[permanent/lifelong/dependent maintenance]
Object[●]
Address[●]
Cadastral number[●]
Area[●]
Legal document[●]
The cost of the object by agreement[●]
Transmission[for a fee / free]
Rent / content[●]
Indexing[●]
Method of payment[●]
Resource provision[●]
Right of residence[●]
Notary[●]
Date of certification[●]
EGRN Registration[●]

Annex 3. Checklist before a notary

Determine the exact type of rent and do not mix the regimes of different contracts.

Check the legal capacity / capacity of the parties and the powers of representatives.

Get the current EGRN statement and title documents.

Check encumbrances, prohibitions, arrests and the rights of third parties.

Determine whether the consent of the spouse or other person is required.

Agree whether the property is transferred for a fee or free of charge.

Record the size of the rent/cost of content and the order of indexation.

Agree on enforcement of obligations.

For lifelong maintenance, describe in detail the actual composition of the services.

To coordinate the right of residence, the procedure for payment of utility costs and repair.

Determine the distribution of notarial and registration costs.

Check the tax implications for both parties.

Prepare bank details and provable method of payment.

Agree applications, acts and evidence of execution.

Before signing, get the final version of the notary.

Legal framework

The Civil Code of the Russian Federation (part two), Chapter 33 "Rent and life maintenance with dependence", including general provisions on the contract of rent and special provisions on permanent rent, life rent and life maintenance with dependence.

When preparing a specific transaction, it is necessary to use the current version of the legislation on the date of certification and take into account the explanations of the notary and judicial practice.

This document is a model and does not replace the individual legal verification of a particular transaction.

Other published edition: Rent Agreement Contract_rent_PPA_Rent_Framework.pptx · web text +

Russian legal model • three types of contract • parties protection • digital circuit PPA Rent Framework 1.0

Practical presentation

August 2026

What is an Rent Contract

Transfer of property in exchange for periodic payments or maintenance

1. Transfer of assets

2. Long-term commitment

3. Enhanced protection

The recipient of the rent transfers the property to the payer. For real estate, the transfer of rights is made through state registration.

The payer assumes the obligation to regularly pay rent or provide lifelong maintenance.

The transaction requires notarization. For real estate there is a special regime to ensure the interests of the recipient.

Key logic: asset → ownership → rent obligation → performance control

Three types of rent in Russian law

It is important not to mix legal regimes in one template

Constant rent

Lifetime rent

Lifetime Content

• Indefinitely

• Recipient: Citizen or Permissible NGO

• Rent repurchase possible

• Suitable for long-term income commitment

• Paid until the recipient dies

• Recipient is a citizen

• Monetary nature

• Special consequences of a material breach

• Transferred property

• Contents: housing, food, care, etc.

• Requires a detailed fixation of the scope of duties

• Most sensitive mode by execution

How to Set Up an Rent Contract

Transaction sequence from model selection to execution

1. Model

2. Object

3. Terms

4. Notary

5. Registration

Select the type of rent and parties

Check property and rights

Fix size, indexing, security

To certify the contract and the will of the parties

For real estate to register the transfer of rights

After registration, the documented execution begins: payments, services, acts, confirmations, delay control.

What must be fixed in the contract

The more precise the conditions, the lower the risk of dispute

Subject

Rent Size

Full description of property, title, status and encumbrances

Amount, periodicity, method of payment, moment of performance

Indexing

Resource provision

The mechanism of increasing payments and mandatory minimums of the law

Pledge, guarantee, surety, insurance - depending on the object

Termination

Evidence

Substantial violations, consequences, return of property or redemption

Bank documents, acts, checks, execution log, notifications

Mechanisms of protection of the recipient of rent

Rent is not an ordinary installment, but a special secured obligation

IN REAL ESTATE

IN MOVEMENT OF PROPERTY / MONEY

  • Notarization of the transaction
  • State registration of transfer of ownership
  • Special provision of the interests of the recipient on the transferred object
  • Control of subsequent orders of the object taking into account the encumbrance
  • Contractual security: pledge, guarantee, independent guarantee
  • Insurance of individual risks
  • Direct bank payment circuit
  • Deterioration notices and the right to early protection

The main principle: protection should be verifiable and act not only on paper, but also in the process of execution.

Key risks of the transaction

What most often becomes a source of conflict

For the recipient

For the payer

How to reduce risk

• Non-payment or incomplete maintenance

• Loss of control over the transferred asset

• Difficulty in proving oral agreements

• Pressure on signature or modification of conditions

• Indefinite commitment period

• Increase in maintenance costs

• Disputes over quality of care or scope of services

• Risk of termination in case of a material breach

• Detail Responsibilities

• Make non-cash payments

• Signed Acts of Execution

• Use insurance and digital event log

Lifetime content: what you need to paint in particular detail

The more natural duties - the more important the measurability of performance

Housing

Nutrition

Care

Medicine

Utilities

Repairs

Accompanying

Ritual services

It is recommended to attach to the contract “Regulations of content”: frequency, cost, cost limits, confirmation method, emergency situations.

Digital contour of execution

It does not replace notaries and EGRN, but makes the performance more transparent

Agreement

PDF/scan + props

Digital passport contract

Payments

Bank / digital ruble

  • Unique transaction ID and object
  • Information about the parties and powers
  • Schedule of payments / responsibilities
  • Automatic reminders and delay fixation
  • Hash/versionality of documents and applications
  • Separate log of approvals and changes

Services

Acts + checks

Events

Notifications and changes

Monitoring

Delays and indexing

Archive

Chronology of performance

PPA Rent Framework 1.0

Add-on for standardization, verification and scaling of rental transactions

PPA Registry

Digital Passport

Smart Rules

the Register of Contracts and Events

Passport of transaction and asset

automation of timing and indexing

Verification

Risk Score

ESG / Impact

independent verification of performance

Evaluation of payment discipline

Sustainability and social impact indicators

PPA-model should be an additional digital layer and not replace the mandatory requirements of civil, notarial and registration law.

Management architecture PPA Rent

Separation of legal, financial and digital contours

Legal Outline

Financial Outline

Digital framework

  • Notary
  • EGRN / Registers
  • Legal Review
  • Judicial protection
  • Bank / payment agent
  • Escrow or Reserve
  • Insurance
  • Indexation control
  • PPA Registry
  • Digital passport
  • Performance log
  • Verification and analytics

Checklist before signing

A minimum that should be checked before a notary

  • Rent type is selected correctly
  • Object rights confirmed
  • Checked encumbrances and rights of third parties
  • Free or paid transmission
  • The amount of rent corresponds to the law
  • Indexing is clearly described
  • Enforcement really works
  • There is a proven method of calculation
  • Annexes and acts prepared
  • Tax and family consequences are checked

The final version of a particular transaction should be checked by a notary and a specialized lawyer.

Result

A ready base for a legal transaction and a digital product

The project has formed three independent forms of the contract and the basic architecture PPA Rent Framework 1.0.

Legal package

Operating package

PPA-package

Constant rent

Lifetime rent

Lifetime Content

Acts

Object Card

Checklist

Register

Digital passport

Verification of performance

Next level of development: standard PPA Rent 1.0 + Validation Regulations + the Digital Registry + Typical scenarios for real estate, business and social assets.

Published files

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Ecology, biotic communities and ECO-PPA

Documents about biotic communities, natural systems, environmental programmes, ECO-PPA contractual models and food. The thematic collection helps compare concepts, proposed mechanisms and stated objectives.

Materials: 11 · with full text: 11 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Ecology · Full published text

The Biotic Community of Land Use

Source Status: Primary Document

Model of coordination of land use, ecology, production and long-term development of the territory.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/biotsenoz-zemlepolzovaniya

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA

Project ORION22:22 | Version 1.0

26 August 2026

The concept offers a single evidence-based contour: cadastral and legal status is maintained as an independent layer, environmental status is assessed according to a relevant baseline, and each activity is associated with a source of pressure, responsible, cost and verifiable result.

1. Summary for decision

"Earth Use Biocenosis" is a project of the system of diagnostics, management and restoration of living territory in the architecture EQUILIBRIUM - ECO-PPA - SPECZASHCHITA. Its task is to turn scattered cadastral, natural, production and investment information into a verifiable cycle of decisions.

1.1. What the customer receives

  • digital passport of the territory, linking the site, landscape, catchment and history of impacts;
  • a baseline of soil, water, vegetation and habitats, indicating methods and uncertainties;
  • atlas of threats and a priority map, where the risk and confidence of the diagnosis are separately shown;
  • portfolio of events ECO-PPA with responsible, resources, KPI and independent verification;
  • re-observation rules that allow you to prove the effect or change the measure in a timely manner.

1.2. First-level solution

It is recommended to approve the 60-day pre-project stage: choose the territory and the leading problem, determine the customer and scientific partner, agree on access to data and sites, design the baseline, budget and criteria for the transition to the 12-month pilot.

2. Scientific status and working definition

2.1. Working definition

"Land use biocenosis" is a natural and economic system of the territory, including soil and soil biota, water, vegetation, animals and microorganisms, relief and climatic processes, legal regime and actual use, sources of load, objects of influence and mechanisms of management of the result.

2.2. Key distinctions

ConceptUse in concept
Land plotlegally defined object with boundaries, rights and mode of use
Land useMethod and regime of land use by people and organizations
Land coverobserved physical cover: forest, arable land, water, development, open ground
Soil biocenosisa community of organisms related to the soil environment and its functions
Landscape / catchmentenvironmental contour, which often crosses cadastral and administrative boundaries
Digital passportanalytical layer; does not replace EGRN and legally significant procedures

3. The problem of fragmentary management

Cadastral accounting answers primarily to questions of object and law; environmental monitoring - to questions of the state of the environment; agronomic and production data - to questions of technology and yield; investment documents - to questions of resources and payback. Without a common identifier, time, scale and methodology, this information does not constitute proof of cause or effect.

GapManagement consequence
Boundariescadastral site does not coincide with the catchment, habitat or transfer area
Time GapOne-time surveys do not show seasonality and trend
Fracture of methodssatellite feature is taken as a confirmed state without ground inspection
Gap in decisionsthe event is not related to the baseline, control area and responsible
The economic gapcosts are fixed, but the unit cost of the confirmed result is not calculated

4. Purpose, objectives and issues of the system

The strategic goal is to ensure the evidential preservation and restoration of land functions with the legitimate and economically justified use of the territory.

  1. What is happening to the territory and what is the reliability of this conclusion?
  2. What changes are natural, seasonal or caused by economic stress?
  3. Where is the likely source of the pressure and what alternative explanations remain?
  4. How are soil, water, vegetation, habitats and land users affected?
  5. Which action has the best ratio of urgency, effect, cost and risk?
  6. Did the package of measures give a measurable result relative to the baseline and the comparison site?

5. Control object and spatial scales

The system maintains several compatible, but not interchangeable, circuits. The decision is made on the scale at which the process exists: law at the site level, erosion runoff at the slope and catchment level, habitat connectivity at the landscape level, and policy at the municipal or regional level.

ScaleKey management issue
Siterights, permitted use, local soil and economic data
Field / quartertechnological unit, actual cover, local measures
Slope / catchmenterosion, runoff, flooding, pollution transfer
Location / Corridorbiodiversity, fragmentation, invasive species
Municipalityspatial planning, infrastructure, balance of interests
Regioncomparable standards, inter-municipal flows and recovery programme

6. Principles and evidence

  • a relevant baseline instead of a universal benchmark for all types of land;
  • separation of observation, diagnosis, hypothesis of cause and legally significant fact;
  • ground verification of remote signs and traceability of samples;
  • action hierarchy: prevent → reduce → recover → compensate residual effect;
  • level of confidence next to each risk and forecast;
  • independent verification of significant results and preservation of version history;
  • The algorithm does not establish the right and does not replace the powers of the authorities.

7. Baseline and typology of the territory

The baseline is formed before the selection of environmental targets KPI. The territory is stratified by natural area, terrain, soils, moisture, cover, history of use, intensity of load and legal regime. Comparisons are made only within comparable classes.

BlockMandatory information
Right and Identitycadastral number, category, IRR, rights, restrictions, zones with special conditions
Natural basisgeology, relief, climate, soils, catchment, background ecosystems
Covering and useactual cover, culture/forest/building, history of changes
Loadsprocessing, grazing, construction, pollution, water collection, fires, recreation
Receptorssoil, water, habitats, population, economic objects
Trustsource, date, method, resolution, error, completeness and verification status

8. Soil and soil biocenosis

Soil is assessed as an environment that provides productivity, circulation of substances, water regulation, carbon storage and habitat of organisms. The set of indicators depends on site function and threats; one measurement does not fully describe “soil health.”

ContourExamples of indicators
Physicsgranulometric composition, density, sealing, aggregate stability, infiltration, erosion
ChemistrypH, organic carbon/substance, nutrients, salinity, target pollutants
Biologymicrobial biomass/breathing, soil fauna, roots, functional indicators
Modehumidity, temperature, freezing, overmoistening, drought
Data qualitydepth and selection scheme, season, laboratory, control samples, uncertainty

9. Water, vegetation and biodiversity

9.1. Hydrological regime

Humidity and infiltration, surface runoff, groundwater, flooding and drying, coastal strip condition and catchment transport are assessed. The local measure is checked for no downstream transfer of damage.

9.2. Vegetation and habitats

Soil cover, seasonal productivity, tree and grass vegetation structure, agrocenose condition, fragmentation and habitat connectivity are considered with respect to the type of territory. The growth of species does not always mean improvement: the standard, functions and invasive species are important.

9.3. Climatic loads

Drought, extreme precipitation, heat, wind, freezing and fire hazards are included as external conditions affecting the risk and interpretation of the result. One season does not form a multi-year climate norm.

10. Law, cadastre and restrictions

In the Russian Federation, the legal regime is determined by the category of land, permitted use and special restrictions. State monitoring of lands and EGRN have their own powers and legal significance. The project passport uses this information as sources and does not replace them.

Legal layerUsage Rule
Category and IRIpermissible purposes and mode of use; checked for current official information
Rights and encumbrancesproperty, rent, easements, other restrictions
Boundariesquality of coordinates, intersections, actual use behind the contour
ZOUIT and Securitysanitary, water protection, environmental and other special regimes
Credentialswhat body establishes the fact, issues an order or makes a decision

11. Threat Atlas and Causal Chains

ThreatProbable chainMain effect
Erosionopen ground + Slope + stock/windloss of the upper horizon, silting water
Sealmachinery, grazing, constructionreduction of infiltration and root volume
Loss of organic matterDisruption of the balance of receipt and mineralizationDecreased structure and sustainability
Salting / Moisturizingwater regime, reclamation, groundwaterProductivity constraints and community change
Pollutionindustry, waste, agrochemicalsToxic effects and limitations of use
Soil sealingConstruction and coverageloss of functions, growth of runoff and overheating
Fragmentation / Invasionroads, clearing, drifting speciesloss of connectivity and ecosystem change

Each threat card contains an observable signal, alternative explanations, the subject of the impact, urgency, level of confidence, necessary verification, and permissible actions. The reason is not considered confirmed only by spatial correlation.

12. System of indicators

BlockKey indicators
Covering and useclasses of cover; actual use; modification; proportion of sealed surface
Productivityseasonal dynamics of vegetation; yield/biomass adjusted for weather
Soil carbonstock and concentration by standardized depth; density and uncertainty
Physics of soilsealing; infiltration; aggregate stability; erosion vulnerability
Chemistry of soilpH; salts; nutrients; target pollutants
Biologybiological activity; indicator groups; habitat status
Waterhumidity; runoff; flooding; water quality according to the target program
RightCategory/IRI compliance; limits; quality of borders; conflicts identified
Managementreaction time; execution of measures; result before/after/control; residual risk

13. Observation Network and Quality Control

The architecture is built on the principle of "review → stratification → ground check → laboratory confirmation → re-observation". Remote sensing provides coverage but does not replace field diagnosis.

ContourRole
Satellitescover, seasonal dynamics, humidity/surface temperature, signs of changes
UAVslocal detailing, relief, erosion forms, cover and objects
Field routesdescription of soils, vegetation, loads and photo fixation
Support areasRe-measurement and calibration of distance signs
Laboratoryconfirmation of physical, chemical and biological indicators
Cadastre and business datalegal regime, borders, transactions and history of use
  • Stratified sampling design and documented representativeness;
  • field duplicates, blanks and control samples, where applicable;
  • single units, coordinates, time, depth, method and storage chain;
  • Calibration of models by independent sample and publication of the error matrix;
  • versioning of algorithms, the prohibition of hidden correction of source data.

14. Digital passport and architecture EQUILIBRIUM

The passport combines the legal identifier and the environmental contour, but keeps their origin and status separately. The hypergraph EQUILIBRIUM links the site, observation, sample, source, threat, event, performer, cost, and proof of outcome.

Passport sectionContents
Identityplot, economic unit, landscape, catchment, version of borders
Base Linesoil, water, cover, vegetation, habitats, climatic loads
Observationdate, coordinates, method, source, accuracy, status QA/QC
Diagnosisthreat, perceived cause, alternatives, risk and confidence
Actionmeasure, responsible, budget, timing, permissions and stop conditions
Resultbefore/after/control, effect, residual risk, independent verification
Accessroles, change log, protection of sensitive and commercial data

15. Diagnostics and management cycle

  1. Inventory of the site and the ecological contour.
  2. Check the quality and comparability of the original data.
  3. Identify the change and form several causal hypotheses.
  4. Confirm priority areas by field and laboratory.
  5. Assess risk, urgency, confidence and interests affected.
  6. Select an action in the hierarchy of prevention, reduction and recovery.
  7. Complete package ECO-PPA with resources and results criteria.
  8. Compare the result with the baseline and the comparison area.
  9. Update your passport, risk model, and next cycle decision.

16. ECO-PPA: portfolio of activities and economy

ECO-PPA translates the diagnosis into a project where the environmental result is related to the beneficiaries, payer, capital and operating costs, duration, uncertainty and method of verification. Before the baseline survey, neither effect nor profitability is guaranteed.

Issue addressedExamples of measuresVerification of the result
Erosioncover crops, forest strips, contour organization, drainagecoating, flushing/deletion, condition of the water intake
Sealrestricted passages, controlled traffic, restoration of structureDensity, resistance, infiltration
Water Modebuffer strips, drainage/moisture recovery, drain retentionhumidity, runoff, flooding, water quality
Pollutionsource localization, removal/isolation, remediation by projectconcentration, area, migration, residual risk
Habitatscorridors, restoration of cover, control of invasionscoherence, indicator types, sustainability

17. Distribution of roles

ParticipantResponsibility
EQUILIBRIUMintegration of data, passports, hypergraph, diagnostics, scenarios and evidence
ECO-PPAportfolio design, resources, financing, KPI and verification
SPECZASHCHITAsurveys, cooperation of performers, field and rehabilitation work
Authoritiesauthority, official data, coordination and legally significant decisions
Land usersaccess, history of operations, implementation and operational feedback
Scientific Council and Laboratorymethods, observation design, quality and interpretation
Independent ValidatorChecking the baseline, methods, result and limitations of the conclusions

18. Pilot for 12 months

MonthsStageResult
0–2Pre-projectterritory, problem, customer, data agreements, base line design
2–4Inventoryarchival, satellite, cadastral and economic data; stratification
3–6Field and laboratoryseasonally permissible surveys, reference sites, QA/QC
5–7Passports and Atlasdigital passports, threat map, priorities and causal hypotheses
7–10Actions2–4 Types of site interventions and comparisons
10–12Verificationre-observations, economics, independent audit and decision to continue
13–36Long cyclemulti-season check of recovery, productivity and carbon effects

19. KPI, scaling risks and criteria

19.1. Project KPI for discussion

BlockPurpose of the pilot
Data≥95% required passport fields; ≥90% valid support contour sets
Verification100% critical anomalies have check card and solution
Boundariesconsistency of cadastral and actual contours assessed for the entire pilot sample
Decisionsat least three packages ECO-PPA with responsible, budget and verification method
Effectchange in the leading indicator is estimated relative to the baseline and the comparison area
SecurityAbsence of confirmed transfer of damage to neighboring territory

19.2. Main risks

RiskControl measure
Mixing law and ecologyseparate data statuses; legal conclusions only by the competent authority
Misdiagnosis by imageground-based verification and error matrix
Seasonalitycomparable time and follow-up 24–36 months
False Causalitytime series, comparison area and alternative hypotheses
Carbon Promisesseparate recognized methodology and independent verification
Closed Datarole access, aggregation, contracts and logging
Conflict of interestseparation of the performer and the validator

20. Roadmap, solution and sources

20.1. Scaling

HorizonBenchmark
0–2 monthspre-project: territory, methodology, data, budget, partners
3–14 months12-month pilot and independent audit
15–36 monthsmulti-season surveillance and a network of different types of pilots
37–48 monthsRegional standard for passports and data exchange
49–60 monthsnational network and pairing with GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM"

20.2. Decision

Approve 60-day pre-project stage; appoint the customer and the working group; choose the pilot territory; form a list of official and household data; agree on field access; submit the pilot's passport, budget, quality plan and criteria for transition to 12-month stage.

20.3. Main sources

[1] Land Code of the Russian Federation No. 136-FZ. Official text: https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102073184

[2] Federal Law No. 218-FZ "On State Registration of Real Estate": https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102376335

[3] Order of Rosreestr from 22.07.2021 No P/0315 on state monitoring of lands: https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202112100058

[4the Order of Rosreestr 23.08.2024 No P/0267/24 Changes in the current c 01.03.2025: https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202411210029

[5] Federal Law No. 101-FZ "On ensuring the fertility of agricultural land": https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102054366

[6] Order of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia 24.12.2015 № 664 the Monitoring of Agricultural Lands: https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001201603230036

[7] Water Code of the Russian Federation 74-FZ: https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102107048

[8] FAO/ITPS. Towards a definition of soil health: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ffb5feaf-8388-4e2f-b319-2260a9a6f5a2/content

[9] FAO. Global Soil Health Indicators and Assessment: https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-degradation-restoration/global-soil-health-indicators-and-assessment/en/

[10] FAO. Soil Degradation and Restoration: https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-degradation-restoration/en/

[11] UNCCD. Land Degradation Neutrality overview: https://www.unccd.int/land-and-life/land-degradation-neutrality/overview

[12] UNCCD. Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality: https://www.unccd.int/land-and-life/land-degradation-neutrality/ldn-conceptual-framework

[13] UNEP. SDG indicator 15.3.1 and its three subindicators: https://sdgs.unep.org/article/sdg-indicator-1531

[14] IPBES. Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration (2018): https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3794559?ln=en

[15] Directive (EU) 2025/2360 — Soil Monitoring Law; international benchmark, not Russian law: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2025/2360/oj/eng

[16] Copernicus Land Monitoring Service: https://land.copernicus.eu/en

[17] Copernicus Data Space. Sentinel-2 mission parameters: https://dataspace.copernicus.eu/data-collections/copernicus-sentinel-missions/sentinel-2

[18] OECD. Land cover change indicator: https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/land-cover-change.html

Other published edition: LAND USE BIOcenosis_Land Use_Presentation.pptx · web text +

System of diagnostics, management and restoration of living territory

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA

ORION22:22 | Version 1.0 | 26.08.2026

From area and category to health, function and proven effect

The survey does not show the health of the area

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

WHAT THE STUDY SEES

WHAT IS NEEDED FOR MANAGEMENT

Borders and Square

Land category

type of permitted use

rights holder and restrictions

erosion and sealing

water and organic matter

vegetation and habitats

load, risk and result of measures

NO

DIAGNOSIS

Cadastral information is necessary, but the ecological state requires a separate evidence circuit.

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

Project name combines scientific terms

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

IMPORTANT BIOCENOSIS

"BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE"

Organisms and connections in the soil

Umbrella project concept: connects natural processes, economic use, law and management.

ECOSYSTEM / LANDSCAPE

functions and spatial flows

AGROCENOSIS

Managed Agricultural Community

SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM

People, Institutions and Nature

The Living Earth is a management metaphor, not a substitute for scientific and legal definitions.

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

The territory lives in two contours at once

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

Cadastre and law

ENVIRONMENTAL AND LANDSCAPE

Land and Law

Category and WRI

Limitations and encumbrances

Oversight and formal procedures

slope and catchment

soil-water flows

Habitats and Corridors

Impacts Abroad

DIGITAL

PASSPORT

Connects the contours

The passport does not replace the EGRN and legally significant procedures.

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

Monitoring is closed in the management cycle

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

DESCRIPTION

DIAGNOSIS

PRIORITY

MEASURES

TRAINING

PASSPORT

VERIFICATION

ACTION

Each measure ends with an effect check and an update of the knowledge of the territory.

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

Nine layers form the territory passport

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

LAW

POKROV

RELIEF + WATER

Boundaries •

land • building

slopes • stock

SOIL: PHYSICS

SOIL: CHEMICAL

PAINTING: BIOLOGY

Structure • Density

pH • salt • pollution

Breathing • Biota

VEGETABLES

LOCATIONS

LOAD + MEASURES

State • Phenology

Connectivity • species

Operation • Cost • Effect

The layer stores the source, date, method, accuracy, and status of the evidence.

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

Processes go beyond the boundaries of the site

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

PLATFORM

Right • operation • local sample

FIELD / QUARTAL

homogeneous control area

WALL / WATER

runoff • erosion • substance transfer

LOCATION CORRIDOR

Connectivity and migration of species

MUNICIPALITY / REGION

Land use balance and scenarios

Decision unit ≠ unit of process

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

The indicator panel does not hide risks

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

BASIC NUCLEAR SDG 15.3.1

POKROV

PRODUCTIVITY

ORGANIC HYDROGEN

Change of classes

Vegetation dynamics

Stocks in soil

+ LOCAL DIAGNOSTICS

erosion and sealing

water and salinization

Soil Biota

Connectivity of habitats

pollution

legal status

The integral index does not replace the initial signals, thresholds and uncertainty.

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

Satellite gives an overview - the field confirms the diagnosis

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

DZZ

Fields

Cover • Humidity • Dynamics

section • sample • bioindication

SINGLE

MODEL

TERRITORIES

DRON / MOBILE CONTOUR

LABORATORY +

Details • routes

Confirmation • Right • History

ERS identifies areas of focus, but does not replace field and laboratory measurements.

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

EQUILIBRIUM Linking Site, Threat and Result

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

RECEIVED

Remote sensing • field • laboratory • registers

QUALITY

method • date • coordinates • errors

REFERENCE

plot ↔ slope ↔ catchment ↔ habitat

DIAGNOSTICS

anomaly • cause • confidence

SCENARIUM

without action • measure • residual risk

ECO-PPA

project • resources • term • performer

VERIFICATION

before / after / control • passport

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

Atlas of Threats Turns Signal into Hypothesis

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

EROSIA

Nude • Moths • Takeaway

SIGNAL

WEATHER

gauge • density • infiltration

CAUSE OF HYPOTHESIS

THE LOSS OF ORGANICS

carbon • structure • biota

FIELD CHECK

ASSOCIATION / MOVEMENT

Salt • water • relief

PRIORITY OF MEASURES

POLLUTION / INQUIRY

source • area • receptor

FRAGMENTATION / INVASION

corridors • kinds • dynamics

Statuses: observation → hypothesis → confirmation

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

Hierarchy of actions protects against false compensation

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

AVOID

REMOVE

Do not create a new degradation

RECONSTRUCTION

Reduce the current pressure

COMPENSATE THE FACILITY

return functions on disturbed ground

Only proven residual damage

Compensation should not justify preventable damage.

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

Roles are divided - proof independently

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

EQUILIBRIUM

data • hypergraph • diagnostic • scenarios

ECO-PPA

portfolio of measures • resources • KPI • verification

SPECZASHCHITA

survey • field work • execution

STATE / LAWYER

Formal decisions within the scope of authority

SCIENCE + LABORATORY

Methods • analysis • independent control

The executor of the measure does not substitute for independent verification of the result.

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

Pilot checks system for 12 months

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

FRAME

BASIC LINE

DIAGNOSIS

DRAFT MEASURES

IMPLEMENTING

VERIFICATION

9–10

11–12

Borders •

Remote sensing • field • registers

• reasons

ECO-PPA • resources

2–3 Leading measures

before / after • audit

base line • atlas threats • digital passport • verified measures • plan 24–36 months

Result package

The annual pilot does not prove long-term soil restoration and carbon effect.

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

100%

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

Success is data quality and proven effect

PROJECT OBJECTIVES FOR DISCUSSION

Valid Records

the reference contour

Priority threats

Checked

The measures have a design

before / after / control

Initial signals and uncertainty are available

The effect is compared to the baseline and control

Each threat has a cause and a status of evidence.

long-term trends put into monitoring 24–36 months

Values are the goals of the pilot, not the results already achieved.

BIOCENOSIS OF LAND USE

Launch the pre-project stage

DECISION

DAYS

Results of the stage

pilot territory and ecological contour

Register of data, gaps and rights holders

Scientific protocol and quality plan

BIOCENOSIS

LAND USE

Observations, roles and verifications

Measure → Understand → Change → Prove

passport 12-month pilot ECO-PPA

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA

ORION 22:22

Sources cited in presentation 25

  • Visual: original OpenAI ImageGen scientific editorial illustration generated for this deck, 2026-08-26.
  • Land Code of the Russian Federation: https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102073184
  • FAO Sustainable Land Management: https://www.fao.org/land-water/land/sustainable-land-management/en/
  • FAO Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/9a5b9373-3558-43b3-b732-f69326a7314d/content
  • IPBES Land Degradation and Restoration Assessment: https://ict.ipbes.net/ipbes-ict-guide/data-and-knowledge-management/citations-of-ipbes-assessments/land-degradation-assessment
  • Project terminology; the umbrella term is explicitly distinguished from formal scientific concepts.
  • Rosreestr — state land supervision: https://rosreestr.gov.ru/activity/gosudarstvennyy-nadzor/gosudarstvennyy-zemelnyy-kontrol-nadzor/
  • UNCCD LDN conceptual framework: https://www.unccd.int/land-and-life/land-degradation-neutrality/ldn-conceptual-framework
  • Project operating model; no external quantitative claim.
  • Copernicus Land Monitoring Service: https://land.copernicus.eu/
  • Project digital passport layer model.
  • UN SDG indicator 15.3.1 metadata: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/?Goal=15&Target=&Text=
  • FAO Global Soil Organic Carbon Map: https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/data-hub/soil-maps-and-databases/global-soil-organic-carbon-map-gsocmap/en/
  • Local diagnostic panel is a project proposal.
  • Copernicus CORINE Land Cover: https://land.copernicus.eu/en/products/corine-land-cover
  • Rosreestr — national reports: https://rosreestr.gov.ru/activity/gosudarstvennoe-upravlenie-v-sfere-ispolzovaniya-i-okhrany-zemel/gosudarstvennyy-natsionalnyy-doklad-o-sostoyanii-i-okhrany-zemel-rossiyskoy-federatsii/
  • Project-specific semantic and evidence architecture.
  • FAO Soil Degradation & Restoration: https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-degradation-restoration/en/
  • Threat taxonomy is a project diagnostic framework.
  • UNCCD Land Degradation Neutrality overview: https://www.unccd.int/land-and-life/land-degradation-neutrality/overview
  • CBD Global Biodiversity Framework, Target 2: https://www.cbd.int/gbf/targets/2
  • Project governance proposal; official powers remain with competent authorities.
  • Project pilot roadmap and assumptions; measures and duration require site-specific approval.
  • All KPI values shown are project targets for discussion, not externally validated outcomes.
  • Project decision proposal; no external quantitative claim.

Published files

Ecology · Full published text

Biotic Community: Air

Source Status: Primary Document

A concept for a system combining nature and technology to monitor and restore the air environment.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/biotsenoz-vozdukh

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA

Project ORION22:22 | Version 1.0

26 August 2026

SUMMARY FOR DECISIONS

"Biocenosis: Air" transfers atmospheric monitoring from the mode of fixing individual excesses to the mode of early warning, determining the likely source, forecasting the transfer, assessing the impact and verifying the result of the measures taken. The system complements, but does not replace, state environmental, sanitary and hydrometeorological control.

The scientifically accurate core of the project is the monitoring of the aerobic, bioaerosols and physico-chemical matrix of the air environment. The term "biocenosis" is retained as a strong project name, with the document directly delineating the detection of a biological marker, viability, activity, infectiousness, and real risk.

Six management issues

  1. What is happening to the air now?
  2. Is the change natural, seasonal, or dangerous?
  3. Where is the likely source?
  4. Where and at what speed does the impact move?
  5. Who and what ecosystems are at risk?
  6. What action is necessary and has it produced a measurable result?

Document structure

  1. The meaning of the project
  2. Scientific framework and working definition
  3. Mission, purpose and objectives
  4. Principles of the system
  5. Object and limits of observation
  6. The observation circuit
  7. Indicators and normative benchmarks
  8. Measuring network
  9. Data Architecture EQUILIBRIUM
  10. Atlas of Threats
  11. Algorithm of reaction
  12. ECO-PPA as implementation contour
  13. Distribution of roles
  14. Pilot for 12 months
  15. KPI and Evidence
  16. Risks and constraints
  17. Scaling
  18. Final decision and sources

1. The meaning of the project

Traditional air monitoring is more often organized according to individual departmental contours: meteorology, chemical pollutants, sanitary supervision, biological observations and enterprise data exist nearby, but are not always linked into a single causal picture. The project creates a cross-cutting management chain:

  • to observe physical, chemical and biological factors simultaneously;
  • distinguish between seasonal background, local anomaly and long-distance transfer;
  • associate the measurement with a likely source and a sensitive receptor;
  • to predict the development of the situation and the time of reaching vulnerable objects;
  • formalize measures as verifiable projects ECO-PPA;
  • check the effect of the intervention on the data before, after and in the control area.

2. Scientific framework and working definition

2.1. Why the term requires explanation

In strict ecology, biocenoses are a collection of interacting populations inhabiting a particular biotope. For a large part of organisms, the atmosphere serves as a temporary medium of transport. Therefore, it is impossible to declare the entire atmosphere as a single proven self-sustaining biocenosis. More precise scientific terms: aerobics, aerobics, atmospheric microbiome, and bioaerosol.

2.2. Working definition

"Biocenosis: Air" is the project name of a dynamic natural and man-made system, including aerobic and biological particles of the air environment, the physical and chemical matrix of the atmosphere, sources, processes of transfer and transformation, objects of influence, as well as digital and organizational mechanisms of risk prevention and management.

An aerobiome is a dynamic set of microorganisms in a given airspace, changing depending on the season, time of day, meteorological conditions, type of surface and the origin of air masses. Studies show reproducible daily and seasonal changes in the composition of the atmospheric microbiome, as well as long-range transport of microorganisms [8–12].

3. Mission, purpose and objectives

Strategic objective: To ensure continuous monitoring, forecasting and managed recovery of air quality and associated natural systems based on evidence.

  • to form a multi-component picture of the air condition;
  • identify chemical, physical and biological abnormalities;
  • identify likely sources and routes of transfer;
  • forecast the situation on the horizons 6, 24 and 72 hours;
  • assess the impact on the population, plants, animals and microorganisms;
  • create targeted warning and response scenarios;
  • to form passports of the air environment of the territories;
  • create an evidence base ECO-PPA and verify the result of each intervention;
  • scale solutions from individual facility to region and cross-border space.

4. Principles of the system

  • Scientific correctness: reproducible methods, quality control, field and laboratory controls.
  • Harm prevention: an early signal is more valuable than a late fixation of damage.
  • Multilevel: Continuous sensors are complemented by reference instruments, laboratories and remote data.
  • Separation of statuses: observation, analytical hypothesis and confirmed conclusion are marked separately.
  • Uncertainty: next to the forecast and index, a level of trust is published.
  • Person in the loop: mandatory decisions are made by an authorized person or body.
  • Compatibility: the system is built into the existing state and scientific contours.
  • Evidence: Each activity is related to the starting level, purpose and verification of the result.
  • Openness and protection: Anonymized environmental data is opened, sensitive information is protected.
  • Non-repression of life: the goal is to manage hazardous sources and exposure, not to sterilize the outside air.

5. Object and limits of observation

The main object is the surface layer of the atmosphere and the physical, chemical and biological components circulating in it, associated with a specific territory, sources and receptors of influence. Each program specifies a geographic boundary, altitude range, season, observation period, and receptor class.

Spatial levels

  1. Point: school, hospital, residential yard, workplace or enterprise.
  2. Microzone: a neighborhood, industrial site, park or agricultural facility.
  3. Municipal area: city or district.
  4. Air pool: an area connected by common air flows.
  5. Regional network: municipal, industrial and background points.
  6. Interregional and transboundary level: long-range transport of smoke, dust, allergens and pollutants.

Functional boundaries

Outdoor air, indoor air and human breathing area do not mix in one array without marking. The internal environment is taken into account as a conjugate module, because the sources, standards and management methods are different. The system does not replace clinical diagnosis, epidemiological investigation and official authority of the authorities.

6. The observation circuit

LevelWhat is observedManagement result
0. ContextRelief, land use, population, sources, firesMap of sources and receptors
1. PhysicsTemperature, humidity, pressure, wind, precipitation, radiationConditions of transport and dispersion
2. AerosolPM1, PM2.5, PM10, particle number and size, black carbonIntensity and type of episode
3. ChemistryNO₂/NOx, SO₂, CO, O₃, NH₃, VOCs and source markersProfile of pollution
4. BiologyPollen, spores, bacteria, fungi, allergens, endotoxinsAerobiome and biological load
5. EcosystemsPrecipitation, plant condition, phenology, bioindicatorsEnvironmental effect
6. ExpositionPopulation, time of exposure, sensitive objectsVulnerability map
7. ManagementEvents, decisions, timing, measures, residual riskProof of result

7. Indicators and normative benchmarks

7.1. Baseline indicator system

BlockBasic indicatorsExpanded indicators
MeteorologyTemperature, humidity, pressure, wind, precipitationRadiation, turbulence, mixing height
AerosolPM1, PM2.5, PM10Ultrafine particles, dimensions, black carbon
GasesNO₂/NOx, SO₂, CO, O₃, NH₃VOCs and profile substances
AerobiotaPollen, spores, total biological loadBacteria, fungi, metagenomics, target markers
BioriskAllergens, endotoxinViability, toxins, AMR-markers
EffectPlant sedimentation and conditionPhenology, biodiversity, bioindication
ExpositionPopulation and time in the areaModels of vulnerable groups without disclosure
SystemCompleteness and availability of dataPrediction accuracy, false alarms, reaction time

7.2. WHO guidelines 2021

The WHO recommendations are a health-preventive guideline and do not replace national standards. In the official Russian assessment, the current sanitary requirements are applied; before submitting the document, it is necessary to check the current edition of SanPiN 1.2.3685-21 [1, 6].

ComponentLong-term orientationShort-term orientation
PM2.55 ug/m³15 ug/m³
PM1015 ug/m³45 ug/m³
NO₂10 ug/m³25 ug/m³
O₃60 ug/m³ — Peak Season100 ug/m³ — maximum 8-hourly average
SO₂—40 ug/m³
CO—4 mg/m³

Note: WHO daily levels are reported as the 99st percentile, not the absolute maximum. For ozone, a separate logic of the peak season and the eight-hour average [1] is used.

7.3. Indices

  1. Physical and chemical air quality index;
  2. Aerobiota status index;
  3. Exposure safety index;
  4. Sustainability index and regenerative capacity of the territory.

8. Measuring network

The network is built on the principle of "reference kernel" + Distributed nodes + Laboratory + Mobile Outline + "Model and Aerospace Data." Low-budget sensors do not receive regulatory measurement status automatically: co-location with support equipment, correction of humidity and temperature influences, maintenance and recalibration are necessary3, 5].

  • one reference-level reference station or integration with an existing one;
  • 10–15 distributed sensor nodes;
  • 3–5 bioaerosol and pollen sampling posts;
  • one background control point;
  • mobile measuring complex and route surveys;
  • reference laboratory and confirmatory laboratories;
  • episodic vertical profiling;
  • satellite, model and meteorological data.

Methods of biological contour

Pollen and spores are determined by microscopy or automated methods; bacteria and fungi by quantitative PCR, 16S/ITS-profiling and, according to a reasonable program, metagenomics. Viability, cultivability, metabolic activity, toxigenicity and infectiousness are evaluated by separate methods. Field, transport and laboratory controls are mandatory for low-mass samples.

9. Data Architecture EQUILIBRIUM

LayerFunction
1. ReceiptStationary and mobile devices, laboratories, remote sensing, weather data, bioindication.
2. Border processingCheck the range, state of the device, time, communication and primary anomalies.
3. IntegrationUnits of measurement, directories of substances, taxa, sources and territories.
4. StorageTime series, geodata, laboratory results, spectra, images and model versions.
5. Semantic HypergraphConnection of territory, station, sample, substance, taxon, source, receptor, event, decision and result.
6. AnalyticsAnomalies, reverse trajectories, source classification, exposure, risk and digital twin.
7. ManagementSituation screen, risk card, notifications, event card, public impersonal card.

Passport Measurement

  • unique identifier, date, time, coordinates and height;
  • Method, unit of measure, detection limit and calibration;
  • uncertainty assessment, quality sign and algorithm version;
  • origin of data and full log of changes;
  • for the sample - selector, packaging, transport and storage chain.

10. Atlas of Threats

ScenarioSignalsMain actions
Industrial emissionsSpecific gases, particles or elements + windConfirmation, localization, verification of the source
Transport EpisodeNOx, CO, black carbon, ultrafine particlesProtection of objects, flow management
Fire and smokePM2.5, CO, organic components, satellite hearthForecasting, warning, filtration
DustPM10, mineral composition, dry weatherDust and work regime
InversionWeak wind, low mixing layer, accumulationPrevention and temporary reduction of emissions
Pollen and DisputesTaxa growth + phenology + weather conditionsAllergenic forecast and filtration modes
Agriculture/wasteNH₃, organic dust, endotoxin, biomarkersRe-selection and source survey
Unusual BiosignalTarget Marker ClusterClosed circuit, reference confirmation, competent authorities
Long-distance transferSynchronous growth in several territoriesInterregional forecast and data exchange
Data substitutionImpossible values, mismatch, signature violationNode isolation, audit, reservation

11. Algorithm of reaction

Step 1. Detect

Normative excess, deviation from the seasonal background, a combination of signals or a forecast of dangerous development.

Step 2. Check the quality

Instrument health, calibration, humidity, neighboring nodes and meteorological plausibility.

Step 3. Verify

Independent method, re-selection, reference laboratory and verification of operations at the source.

Step 4. Assess the risk

Hazard × exposure × vulnerability; trust and urgency are specified separately.

Step 5. Set Source

Wind, reverse trajectories, source register, profiles and mobile survey.

Step 6. Predict

Area of impact and sensitive objects on the horizon 6, 24 and 72 Hours.

Step 7. Make a decision

Green, yellow, orange or red; action approved by competent authority.

Step 8. Check the effect

Before/after comparison, control area, comparable weather and residual risk.

Step 9. Close and learn

The final card of the event, the reason, the effectiveness, the update of the model and regulations.

12. ECO-PPA as implementation contour

ECO-PPA converts observations into funded prevention and recovery packages. Each packet receives a passport linking the problem, the baseline, the solution, the resources, the deadline, and the proof of outcome.

  1. problem, source and baseline;
  2. target result and technical or organizational solution;
  3. responsible participants and the amount of resources;
  4. funding scheme and outcome indicators;
  5. methodology of monitoring, reporting and verification;
  6. terms, grounds for continuation and stop conditions;
  7. residual risk and data access rules.

13. Distribution of roles

ParticipantMain role
EQUILIBRIUMUnified data model, hypergraph, digital twin, forecast, register of events and evidence.
ECO-PPAIntervention projects, resource pooling, KPI, result monitoring and independent verification.
SPECZASHCHITAExecution operator: surveys, network, mobile groups, interaction with enterprises and events.
AuthoritiesOfficial decisions, warnings and actions are strictly within the competence.
Scientific CouncilMethods, thresholds, scientific correctness and revision of models.
LabsConfirmatory research, quality control and storage chain.
Owners of SourcesData, prevention, elimination of causes and implementation of prescribed measures.
Independent VerifierChecking the result of the events ECO-PPA.
IACInterdepartmental analytics, decision-making and strategic scaling.

14. Pilot for 12 months

The pilot is selected on the territory where residential, natural, transport and production zones are combined, there are sensitive objects, a background point, a laboratory partner and the readiness of the authorities. One year covers the seasonal cycle, but does not form a multi-year climate norm.

MonthsStageKey worksResult
1–2DesignSource and receptor map; protocol; quality plan; agreementsPilot's passport
3–4DeploymentInstallation, laboratories, platform, co-location of sensorsWorking Outline
5–6InputCalibration, background maps, thresholds, test notificationsSuitability of data
7–8AnalysisSeasonal profile, sources, exposure, transfer modelTerritory model
9–10Interference2–3 projects: dust, source, filtration or pollenProof of manageability
11Exercises and AuditChemical and biological scenarios, reaction testingOperational readiness
12ResultReport, economics, standards and architecture of the second stageMultiplier Package

Proposed pilot areas

  • the background natural point;
  • residential and public area;
  • transport corridor;
  • industrial or municipal area;
  • agricultural facility;
  • A sensitive receptor is a school, hospital, or social institution.

15. KPI and evidentiary value

Below are the project targets for discussion. They are approved after the survey of the territory, the choice of equipment and the coordination of the methodology.

BlockProject objectiveMethod of confirmation
Technical≥90% Validated data of the reference contour; ≥95% Mandatory MetadataJournal of Quality and Audit
Scientific≥80% significant events confirmed by independent channelReference-check
SourcesSource class defined for a minimum of 70% significant episodesTrajectories and profiles
ForecastMain impact area projected at 6 hoursComparison of forecast and fact
OperationsInitial evaluation of the orange event — up to 30 minutesEvent Log
InterferenceAt least three packages ECO-PPABefore/after/control
ReadinessAt least two comprehensive exercisesIndependent audit

16. Risks and constraints

RiskControl measure
Controversy of the termThe public name is retained; aerobics and bioaerosol are used in TK.
Sensor ErrorsCo-location, calibration, wet correction and standby measurements.
DNA = DangerThe presence, viability, activity and infectivity are separately indicated.
One Seasonal CycleContinued monitoring; ban on conclusions about the long-term trend.
False alarmsMulti-step validation and mandatory level of trust.
Conflict of authorityThe responsibility matrix and the agreement before launch.
PanicUnified protocol of risk communication; separation of pre- and confirmed signal.
Sensitive dataAccess Delimitation, Logging, and Protected Outline.
Data substitutionDigital signature, reservation and anomaly control.
Dependence on supplierOpen interfaces, export and data portability.
Exaggerated effectScenario evaluations and independent verification.

17. Roadmap for scaling

StageTimeframeResult
1. Methodology0–3 monthsGlossary, indicators, data model, instruments, laboratories, regulations and template ECO-PPA.
2. Pilot4–15 monthsFull seasonal cycle, digital twin, interventions, audit and replication package.
3. Network of Pilots16–30 monthsCity, industry, agriculture, natural and northern territories.
4. Regional Standard31–48 monthsSingle center, integration of departments, exchange standard and inter-municipal scenarios.
5. National outline49–60 monthsNetwork of air pools, GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM" and international cooperation.

18. Final decision and sources

18.1. Launch Solution

  1. approve the two-level name: "Biocenosis: Air" / "Monitoring of aerobic and biological factors of air quality";
  2. determine the customer of the pre-project stage and the owner of the result;
  3. choose a pilot territory and a reference laboratory;
  4. 60 days to prepare a scientific protocol, a map of sources and receptors, network architecture and data quality plan;
  5. Agree on a matrix of authority and response rules;
  6. launch 12-month pilot with independent verification and packages ECO-PPA.

18.2. Status of the document

The document is conceptual and is intended for pre-project discussion. Threshold values, equipment composition, legal model, budget and official regulations are approved after the territory is surveyed, consultations with authorized bodies and verification of current regulatory requirements.

18.3. Main sources

[1] WHO. Global Air Quality Guidelines (2021). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228

[2] WMO. Global Atmosphere Watch Programme. https://community.wmo.int/site/knowledge-hub/programmes-and-initiatives/global-atmosphere-watch-gaw-programme

[3] UNEP. GEMS/Air. https://www.unep.org/topics/environment-under-review/gems-air

[4] Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service. Global atmospheric composition forecasts. https://ads.atmosphere.copernicus.eu/datasets/cams-global-atmospheric-composition-forecasts

[5] European Environment Agency. European Air Quality Index. https://airindex.eea.europa.eu/AQI/index.html

[6] SanPiN 1.2.3685-21. Official publication. https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202102030022

[7] Roshydromet. Air pollution status yearbooks. https://www.meteorf.gov.ru/product/infomaterials/ezhegodniki/

[8] Gusareva et al. Short-timescale dynamics of the airborne microbiome. PNAS, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908493116

[9] Gusareva et al. Seasonal and diurnal variations of airborne microbiomes in Western Siberia. Scientific Reports, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78604-8

[10] Mayol et al. Long-range transport of airborne microbes over the global tropical and subtropical ocean. Nature Communications, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00110-9

[11] Vaïtilingom et al. Potential impact of microbial activity on the oxidant capacity and organic carbon budget in clouds. PNAS, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205743110

[12] Archer et al. Air mass source drives bacterial and fungal community composition above the Great Barrier Reef. ISME Journal, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0555-0

[13] WHO, FAO, UNEP, WOAH. One Health Joint Plan of Action. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240059139

Other published edition: AIR BIOCENOSIS Biocenosis_Air_Presentation.pptx · web text +

Aerobiom • Quality of environment • Early Warning

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA

ORION22:22 | Version 1.0 | 26.08.2026

From measuring pollution to managing the viability of the territory

Air is a medium of communication, not a void.

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

ATMOSPHERE

SOURCE

RECEPTOR

Gases • Particles • Drops

pollen • spores • microorganisms

Soil • Water • Plants

City • production

Human • Plants

animals • ecosystems

Air change is quickly becoming an effect - local or carried thousands of kilometers.

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

The public name is strong - the scientific core is accurate

PROJECT NAME

SCIENTIFIC OBJECT

Aerobiom

SCIENTIFIC RESERVATION

dynamic set of microorganisms in a given airspace

DNA

≠ Viability

≠ activity

≠ Infectious

Bioaerosol

biological particles, including pollen, spores and inanimate fragments

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

Disjointed data captures the fact - but does not close the cycle

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

CHEMISTRY

METEO

BIOLOGY

PM • gases • VOC

wind • precipitation • inversion

pollen • spores • markers

SOURCE

ACTION

EFFECT

Control space

Need a single chain: measurement → source → forecast → action → proven result

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

New logic closes the observation in action

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

SOURCE

TRANSFER

EXPOSITION

EFFECTS

TRAINING

EFFECT

ACTION

RISK

Each cycle ends with a result check and updates the territory model.

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

Eight layers form a single air passport

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

CONTACTS

relief • sources • receptors

PHYSICS

temperature • wind • humidity • precipitation

AEROSOL

PM1 • PM2.5 • PM10 • black carbon

CHEMISTRY

NO₂ • O₃ • SO₂ • CO • NH₃ • VOC

BIOLOGY

Pollen • Disputes • bacteria • mushrooms • Allergens

ECOSYSTEMS

Deposition • plants • phenology • bioindicators

EXPOSITION

Population • time • vulnerable objects

GOVERNANCE

Event • solution • measure • residual risk

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

Scale - from the breathing zone to the air pool

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

POINT

School • Hospital • Enterprise

MICROZONE

district • park • industrial site

CITY

Municipal Map of Sources

AIR POOL

Unified Flows and Transfer

REGION / TRANSBOUNDARY

long-range smoke • dust • allergens

Vertical: Breath → roof → profile → satellite

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

Indicators combine chemistry, aerosol and biology

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

PHYSICS + METEO

CHEMISTRY

wind • humidity • radiation

Mixing layer

NO₂ • O₃ • SO₂ • CO

NH₃ • VOC

PASSPORT

AIR

AEROSOL

BIOLOGY

PM1 • PM2.5 • PM10

Dimensions • black carbon

pollen • spores • allergens

bacteria • mushrooms

Normative excess and confirmed biorisk are shown separately - the average index does not hide them.

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

The network grows from a reference kernel to distributed nodes

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

BIOAIROZOLE

LABORATORY

CENTRAL Knots

3–5 posts

confirmation

10–15 points

DZZ + METEO

Satellite •

REFERENT

NUCLEAR

FONDON POINT

MOBILE CONTOUR

control of the territory

routes • sources

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

EQUILIBRIUM Connects measurement with source and solution

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

RECEIVED

Sensors • Laboratory •

MEASUREMENT

QUALITY

Calibration • Range • Time

INTEGRATION

units • directories • geodata

HYPERGRAPH

sample ↔ source ↔ receptor ↔ event

ANALYTICS

anomaly • trajectory • exposure

FORECAST

6 • 24 • 72 Hours + Trust

GOVERNANCE

notification • measure • effect

DECISION

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

Atlas of threats turns an episode into a testable script

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

EMISSIONS

Specific gases + wind

SIGNAL

DHMM

PM2.5 + CO + satellite hearth

VERIFICATION

PILS

PM10 + mineral profile

ACTION

INVERSION

weak wind + accumulation

FILMS / DISPUTES

Taxa + Phenology

The preliminary and confirmed signals are shown separately.

BIOSIGNAL

a Cluster of Target Markers

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

The reaction passes through nine verifiable steps

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

Detect

Verify

Quality

Verify

Rate

Risk

Install

Source

Predict

Accept

decision

Verify

effect

Close and

Learned

R = Danger × Exposure × Vulnerability | Trust and Urgency Are Specified Separately

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

Roles are divided — responsibility is not blurred

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

EQUILIBRIUM

Data • hypergraph • prediction • proofs

ECO-PPA

projects • resources • KPI • verification

SPECZASHCHITA

survey • network • execution • mobile groups

STATE

Formal decisions within the competence

SCIENCE + LABORATORY

methods • confirmation • quality control

Unified methodology • distributed surveillance • responsible execution • independent verification

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

Pilot in 12 months gives first seasonal cycle

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

PROJECT

NETWORKING

ENTER

MODEL

MEASURES

AUDIT

9–10

11–12

map • protocol

installation • integration

Calibration • Background

Sources • exposure

2–3 interventions

Exercises •

Territory passport • early warning • proof of manageability • scaling package

Result

One year covers the season, but does not form a multi-year climate norm.

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

≤30 min

SCIENTIFIC AND CRAFTS CONCEPT

Success is data quality, speed and proven effect

PROJECT OBJECTIVES FOR DISCUSSION

Valid Data

the reference contour

significant events

Verified

Primary Assessment

the Orange Event

At least three intervention packages ECO-PPA

Each orange and red signal receives a final card

Source class defined for most significant episodes

The effect is confirmed by comparison before / after / control

The long-term reduction in incidence is not reported as KPI per year pilot.

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

Launch the pre-project stage

DECISION

DAYS

Results of the stage

pilot territory and reference laboratory

Map of sources, flows and sensitive receptors

Scientific protocol and data quality plan

BIOCENOSIS: AIR

Network architecture, roles and response regulations

Transition from pollution measurement

Managing the viability of the Territory

passport 12-month pilot ECO-PPA

EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA

ORION 22:22

Sources cited in presentation 26

  • Visual: original OpenAI ImageGen scientific editorial illustration generated for this deck, 2026-08-26.
  • WMO Global Atmosphere Watch: https://community.wmo.int/site/knowledge-hub/programmes-and-initiatives/global-atmosphere-watch-gaw-programme
  • Mayol et al., Nature Communications 2017: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00110-9
  • Gusareva et al., PNAS 2019: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908493116
  • Gusareva et al., Scientific Reports 2020: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78604-8
  • Vaïtilingom et al., PNAS 2013: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205743110
  • UNEP GEMS/Air: https://www.unep.org/topics/environment-under-review/gems-air
  • CAMS global forecasts: https://ads.atmosphere.copernicus.eu/datasets/cams-global-atmospheric-composition-forecasts
  • Concept synthesis from the project architecture.
  • Project operating model; no external quantitative claim.
  • WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228
  • WHO/FAO/UNEP/WOAH One Health Joint Plan: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240059139
  • Project layer model synthesized from official monitoring and aerobiome research.
  • WMO Global Atmosphere Watch network framework: https://community.wmo.int/site/knowledge-hub/programmes-and-initiatives/global-atmosphere-watch-gaw-programme
  • European Air Quality Index station typology: https://airindex.eea.europa.eu/AQI/index.html
  • WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines (2021): https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228
  • CAMS pollen forecasts: https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/european-air-quality-forecast-plots
  • European Air Quality Index: https://airindex.eea.europa.eu/AQI/index.html
  • Proposed node counts are project design targets requiring site survey and calibration.
  • Project-specific semantic hypergraph and evidence architecture.
  • Threat taxonomy is a project scenario framework.
  • Project response protocol synthesized from environmental monitoring, quality assurance and One Health principles.
  • Project governance proposal; official powers remain with competent public authorities.
  • Project pilot roadmap and design assumptions; duration and node mix require site-specific approval.
  • All KPI values shown are project targets for discussion, not externally validated outcomes.
  • Project decision proposal; no external quantitative claim.

Published files

Ecology · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM Hydrosphere

Source Status: Primary Document

Strategic Concept for the Observation, Conservation and Restoration of Water Systems.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/gidrosfera-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

Global Aerospace Monitoring and Forecasting System

Project ORION22:22

Initiator of the concept: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Version 1.0 | 26 August 2026

Summary of the concept

Key idea. It is necessary to manage not water as a separate resource, but the health of the entire aquatic ecosystem - from watershed and bottom environment to biota, infrastructure and humans. Underwater robotics becomes a mobile sense and action organ, and EQUILIBRIUM turns measurements into a prediction, solution, and verifiable result.

The concept forms a single water contour of GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM" for continuous observation, early warning and restoration management of oceans, seas, rivers, lakes, reservoirs, swamps, groundwater, glaciers and coastal zones. The contour combines aerospace data, hydroposts, laboratories, biocenose monitoring points, autonomous vehicles and a digital twin of a water body.

The basic unit of the result is the hydroecosystem. Its living nucleus is hydrobiocenosis: an interconnected community of microorganisms, plankton, plants, invertebrates, fish and other organisms. The condition is assessed not by one standard of water, but by a system of physical, chemical, biological, functional and restorative indicators.

  • EQUILIBRIUM - Data integration, digital twin, causal analysis, prediction and result control.
  • GASMP - planetary, basin and inter-territorial observation.
  • Underwater robotics - mobile measurements, anomaly confirmation, mapping, inspection, and controlled operations.
  • ECO-PPA - Mobilization of resources and payment of measurable, independently confirmed effect.
  • SPECZASHCHITA - operator of cooperation, pilot and robotic fleet.
  • ESG-IR and EUT - evidence, verification, compatibility of data, equipment and procedures.

The first practical step is proposed 24-month pilot "HYDROSPHERE-1" at the Syzran node of the Volga and adjacent water area of the Saratov reservoir. The parameters of the landfill are specified after the pre-project survey and coordination with the authorized bodies.

Passport document

ParameterContentsParameterContents
StatusConcept, version 1.0SupersystemORION 22:22
The Digital CoreEQUILIBRIUMObservationGASMP
ImplementationSPECZASHCHITAResourceECO-PPA
VerificationESG-IRCompatibilityEUT
Horizon24 monthsPolygonSyzran / Saratov Reservoir

Contents

  1. Strategic basis and system formula
  2. Terms, object and control boundaries
  3. Hydrosphere map and typology of water systems
  4. Threats, deficits and risk scenarios
  5. Observation architecture and biocenosis point
  6. Integrated Water Ecosystem Health Index
  7. Digital Double Hydrosphere
  8. Underwater robotics: fleet, stations and sensors
  9. Autonomy, safety and environmental constraints
  10. Data, communications, registries and evidence
  11. Management cycle and response
  12. Institutional architecture of ecosystem
  13. Pilot "HYDROSPHERE-1"
  14. Financial and contract model ECO-PPA
  15. Results and ESG-IR-verification
  16. Roadmap and Scaling
  17. Annexes and official sources

The working formula. Hydrosphere -> Hydroecosystem -> Biocenous Point -> Underwater Robotics -> Digital Twin -> warning and action -> ECO-PPA -> ESG-IR-verification.

1. Strategic basis and system formula

Water is both a living environment, a climate regulator, a food and health foundation, a transport infrastructure, an energy resource and a risk carrier. Therefore, separate management of water supply, hydraulic structures, pollution, biodiversity and emergencies inevitably creates information gaps. The hydrosphere requires a system of systems architecture.

V ORION22:22 The new module takes the place of the water circuit of planetary security. He continues the cycle of GASMP: observation -> recognition -> Forecasting -> Warning -> Mobilization -> The response -> Recovery -> control. The difference is that the environmental result is fixed at the level of a specific aquatic biocenosis, and not only at the level of the departmental indicator of water quality.

The main principle. Victory over the water crisis is not the elimination of a single accident, but the achievement of a state in which threats are identified to irreversible damage, resources are mobilized in advance, and recovery is confirmed by measurements of the living system.

1.1. Six functions of the water circuit

  1. See. To collect a continuous space-time picture of water, bottom, biota, infrastructure and load.
  2. Understand. Distinguish between natural dynamics, anomaly and dangerous impact; establish the source and causal relationships.
  3. Predicting. Calculate the spread of pollution, floods, hypoxia, flowering and habitat degradation.
  4. Agree. Connect authorities, science, businesses, infrastructure operators and society around a single evidence picture.
  5. Act. Assign inspection and emergency missions, locate the source and carry out permitted recovery activities.
  6. Check. Compare the state before and after exposure, maintain a digital footprint and independent ESG-IR verification.

1.2. Design principles

  • Basin approach: boundaries of analysis are determined by flows of water, matter and energy, not just administrative territories;
  • biocentricity: the state of living communities is considered as a final indicator of environmental quality;
  • Multi-level: satellite, drone, buoy, bottom station, robot and laboratory complement, not replace each other;
  • Evidence: each measurement has a coordinate, time, calibration, uncertainty, quality sign, and processing history;
  • Prevention before response: priority is given to early detection and preventable damage.
  • person in the loop of the solution: autonomy of navigation does not mean autonomy of dangerous impact;
  • Open compatibility: EUT protocols provide connection of new sensors, devices and participants without breaking the system;
  • Measurable result: resource ECO-PPA is associated with verifiable environmental, economic and social effects.

2. Terms, object and control boundaries

The name “Water Biocenosis” is retained as a program formula. In the scientific and normative part, four levels must be distinguished. This eliminates the mixing of water as a resource, a living community and the ecosystem as a whole.

TermWorking definitionRole in the system
HydrosphereThe Earth's water shell: oceans, seas, surface and groundwater, ice, snow, and atmospheric moisture.Planetary object of observation
Water objectSpatially defined accumulation of water with stable boundaries and regime.Unit of certification and rights
HydrobiocenosisCommunity of aquatic organisms and their system of connections.Live status indicator
HydroecosystemWater object, biotope, biocenosis, flows of matter and energy, external influences.The basic unit of result management
Swimming poolTerritory of formation of runoff and transfer of substances to a water object.Boundary of causal analysis

2.1. Composition of the managed system

  • Water: level, volume, current, temperature, salinity, transparency, chemical composition and water exchange.
  • Bottom environment: relief, precipitation, pollution, gas extraction, habitats and underwater infrastructure.
  • Biota: Microorganisms, phytoplankton, zooplankton, macrophytes, benthos, fish, birds and aquatic mammals.
  • Coastal belt: floodplains, wetlands, spawning grounds, protective vegetation and recreation areas.
  • Man and the economy: water intake, discharges, agriculture, shipping, mining, energy, tourism and communal infrastructure.
  • Management: legal regimes, data owners, responsible operators, laboratories, emergency services and public control.

Unit of result. A specific hydro-ecosystem with boundaries, baseline, health index, sources of load, infrastructure, process owners and a verifiable history of change is passported.

3. Hydrosphere map and typology of water systems

The architecture should work for different water modes, but not impose the same model on them. For each type, their own regulatory ranges, observation frequency, set of bioindicators and the configuration of a robotic cell are specified.

TypeKey processesMonitoring priority
Oceans and seascurrents, heat exchange, acidification, deoxygenation, shelf processesprofiles, gliders, buoys, acoustics, biodiversity
Riversrunoff, pollution transfer, floods, channel dynamicshydraulic posts, route AUV/USV, sources of discharge
Lakes and reservoirsstratification, flowering, hypoxia, accumulation in precipitationvertical profiles, bottom stations, eDNA
Swamp and floodplainswater retention, carbon, filtration and spawninghydroperiod, vegetation, connection with bed
Groundwaterfood, level, migration of pollutionwells, hydrochemistry, flow models
Glaciers and snowaccumulation, melting, contribution to runoffsatellite, ground stations, balance models
Estuaries and deltasmixing of water, sediments, salt wedgemulti-layer profiles, bottom, habitats
Artificial systemswater intake, cleaning, canals, coolingInfrastructure, efficiency, emergency risks

3.1. Scope of observation

  1. Planetary. Water balance, temperature, ice, major pollution and climate trends.
  2. Pool. Flow, floods, droughts, transfer of matter between territories and water bodies.
  3. Aquatorial. Status of a specific water body, bottom environment, habitats and infrastructure.
  4. Local. Load source, emergency site, spawning ground, water intake, dam, pipeline or port.
  5. Micro level. Sample, biofilm, microorganisms, pollutant, individual object or defect.

4. Threats, deficits and risk scenarios

GASMP considers the threat as a dynamic event, rather than a static exceedance mark. For each event, the probability, scale, exposure, speed of development, reversibility and readiness to respond are recorded.

  • Hydrological threats: floods, droughts, shallowing, change of channel, storm surges, ice phenomena and destruction of coasts.
  • Hydrochemical threats: petroleum products, heavy metals, biogenic elements, pharmaceutical residues, microplastics and oxygen deficiency.
  • Biological threats: toxic flowering, pathogens, invasive species, extinction of key species, and breaking of food chains.
  • Man-made threats: accidents of dams, pipelines, platforms, ships, sewage treatment plants and submarine cables.
  • Resource threats: overuse of water, depletion of underground horizons, illegal fishing and user conflict.
  • Information threats: observational omissions, incompatible formats, unconfirmed data, transmission delay, and cyber exposure.

4.1. Priority model

For operational ranking, a dimensionless risk indicator is used:

R = P x S x E x (1 - G)

where P is the probability of the event; S - severity of consequences; E. Exposure to people, ecosystems and infrastructure G - the readiness of the system to detect and respond. The coefficients are normalized in the range from 0 to 1. The formula serves as a framework, and thresholds are approved for each pool after the baseline.

Confirmation rule. One anomalous indication is not recognized as an incident. Independent confirmation by another sensor, apparatus, satellite signature or test sample is required. For toxins, pathogens, heavy metals and microplastics, robotic screening is confirmed by an accredited laboratory.

5. Observation architecture and biocenosis point

The system is built as a network of complementary levels. The space circuit sees the area and dynamics, the stationary nodes give continuous series, the robots reveal depth and localize the source, the laboratory provides metrological confirmation, and the digital twin links the facts into a causal model.

Figure 1. Multilevel architecture of observation, analysis and action

5.1. Hydrobiocenose monitoring point

Hydrobiocenose monitoring point (HBTM) is a digital sense organ of the aquatic area. This is not a single sensor, but a certified cell that includes a location, stationary sensors, robot routes, a sampling program, bioindicators, communication channels, and response scenarios.

Five compulsory point questions
  1. What is happening to the water, bottom, biota and infrastructure now?
  2. Is the change natural, acceptable, or dangerous?
  3. Where is the likely source and what are the causal relationships?
  4. How does change affect hydrobiocenosis, humans, and farming?
  5. What actions are necessary, who is responsible and how will the result be checked?

5.2. Composition of the base point

  • bottom or shore multisensor node with reference time and coordinates;
  • Buy-gate or coastal data channel;
  • Control program of sampling and laboratory reconciliation;
  • route AUV/USV for spatial expansion of measurements;
  • biological profile: eDNA, plankton, benthos, fish, macrophytes and acoustic landscape;
  • thresholds, quality rules, responsible persons and event logs;
  • baseline, status index and post-impact verification scenarios.

6. Integrated Water Ecosystem Health Index

A single index is needed to compare the state in time and prioritize actions, but should not hide the reasons. Therefore, the final assessment is always disclosed by domain, and the risk and anthropogenic load are shown by individual layers.

DomainContentsExamples of indicators
H - HydrologySustainability of the water regimelevel, flow rate, water exchange, temperature, ice mode
C - hydrochemistryquality and suitability of the environmentO2, pH, mineralization, N/P, organics, pollutants
B - BiotaIntegrity of the Living Communityspecies richness, key species, plankton, benthos, fish
F - FunctionsWork of ecosystemself-purification, productivity, trophic bonds, carbon
K - ConnectivityContinuity of habitatsmigration routes, spawning grounds, coastal connectivity
V - ResilienceAbility to return to normalRecovery speed, environmental reserve

The index is calculated in the range from 0 to 100:

I_GE = Σ wᵢ x Sᵢ, Σ wᵢ = 1

Sᵢ is the normalized domain score, wᵢ is the weight set for the type of water system and management purposes. Universal weights are not assigned in advance: they are calibrated by the scientific and methodological council for reference sites and 90-day baseline, then undergo independent verification.

6.1. Additional indexes

  • Risk index R. Probability and expected damage from confirmed threats.
  • Load index L. Intensity of water intake, discharges, shipping, extraction and conversion of coasts.
  • Data index D. Completeness, timeliness, calibration, uncertainty and traceability of measurements.
  • Readiness index G. Ability to detect, confirm, localize and eliminate an event at regulatory time.
  • The index of recovery effect E. Measurable improvement with respect to the baseline, taking into account natural variability.

Prohibition of simplification. The index does not replace primary data, expert interpretation and legal regulations. Any resulting number shall be disclosed prior to measurement, method, instrument, calibration, sample and responsible owner.

7. Digital Double Hydrosphere

Digital twin is a dynamic space-time model of a water body that combines pool geometry, hydrodynamics, chemical processes, biota, infrastructure, and control scenarios. This is not a visual map, but a computational decision-making mechanism.

7.1. Four interrelated models

  1. Hydrodynamic. Level, flow, currents, stratification, heat transfer, sediments and pollutants.
  2. Hydrochemical. Oxygen, biogenic elements, organics, toxicants, reactions and exchange with bottom sediments.
  3. Environmentally. Habitats, populations, food links, productivity, invasive species, and resilience.
  4. Infrastructure-Risk. Water intakes, discharges, dams, pipelines, ports, cables, emergency zones and responsible operators.

7.2. Four modes of operation

  • "What's going on?" Current state and deviation from the seasonal baseline.
  • "Why does it happen?" Sources, inverse transport simulations, and causal relationships.
  • "What will happen?" Scenarios of spread and damage under different weather, hydrological and economic conditions.
  • "What to do?" Verification mission, localization, permissible measures, resource request and result control plan.

7.3. Data trust contour

Each fact comes along with a coordinate, time, device ID, firmware and mission version, measurement method, calibration, uncertainty, quality sign, and transformation chain. The original data remain unchanged; the derived layers and projections have a model version and explanation.

The result of a digital double. Not a "card for the sake of the card", but the assigned action: who to check with what device, in what zone, at what time, according to what protocol and by what measurement to confirm the recovery.

8. Underwater robotics: fleet, stations and sensors

Underwater robotics forms a mobile sensory-executive system of water biocenosis. The devices work together with stationary stations, laboratories and surface locks. Their task is to expand the coverage, quickly confirm events and safely perform operations that are inaccessible or dangerous to humans.

Figure 2. Basic robotic water circuit cell

8.1. Apparatus classes

ClassMain objectiveMode
Underwater gliderlong-term profiles of temperature, salinity, oxygen, currents and chlorophylldays / weeks
AUV-scrutinbathymetry, bottom mapping, search for contaminants and objectsRoute
Hovering-AUVprecise operation of dams, pipes, reefs and bottom stationsManeuverable
ROVvideo diagnostics, sampling, operator-controlled manipulationCable
HROV / worker ROVrepair, valves, sensors, garbage and nets riseOperators
The Bottom RobotPrecipitation, cables, pipes, habitats and long inspectionSlippery
Profiler / Driftervertical structure and transport of water massesDrifting
USVnavigation, communications, energy, mapping and submarine supportsurface water

8.2. Stationary nodes

  • benthic measuring station for bottom, precipitation, bottom water and acoustic background;
  • profiling buoy with automatic movement of sensors vertically;
  • underwater observatory for significant and sensitive areas;
  • docking station for docking, diagnostics, charging and unloading data;
  • navigation and communication node LBL/USBL and acoustic repeater;
  • Calibration station to check the drift of sensors;
  • a buoy-gate that converts an underwater channel into satellite, cellular or radio communications;
  • Coastal situational post, mission manager and digital twin.

9. Sensory Complex and Missions

The payload is formed modularly for the type of water system and task. For each instrument, the accuracy, range, frequency, calibration, drift and usability of the data for the management solution are specified.

GroupFundsWhich confirms
Physics of WaterCTD, level, turbidity, ADCP, turbulencewater structure, currents, transport
HydrochemistryO2, pH, ORP, pCO2, N/P, organic, hydrocarbons, methaneQuality of environment and anomalies
Biologychlorophyll-a, phycocyanin, eDNA, microscopy, hydrophonesflowering, species, biomass, acoustics
Bottommultibeam and lateral sonar, profiler, cameras, laserrelief, precipitation, habitat
Infrastructurethickness, corrosion, vibration, deformation, leakstechnical condition and risk
NavigationINS, DVL, SLAM, LBL/USBL, GNSS after risingcoordinates, route, security

9.1. Typical set of missions

  • creation of bathymetric and biotope map;
  • building a four-dimensional picture of the water column;
  • search for hypoxia, eutrophication and harmful flowering;
  • localization of oil, chemical and municipal discharges;
  • control of migrations, spawning grounds, biomass and invasive species;
  • inspection of dams, water intakes, pipes, cables and port facilities;
  • detection of lost networks, garbage and dangerous objects;
  • control of the state before and after environmental measures.

9.2. Digital passport of the device

Each robot and stationary node has a passport: working depth, autonomy, payload, navigation accuracy, acoustic profile, energy reserve, acceptable conditions, calibration history, maintenance, software version, and a safe failure scenario.

10. Autonomy, safety and environmental constraints

Architecture divides autonomy of movement, autonomy of observation and the right to influence. The robot can independently rebuild the route within the approved mission, but does not receive the right to a dangerous material impact without the decision of an authorized person.

LevelFeaturesTolerance
A0manual controlOperator performs all actions
A1course, depth and position retentionAssisted Mode
A2following an approved route and collecting dataautomatic route
A3Mission and obstacle avoidanceIndependent observation
A4Rebuilding the route on an anomaly in the geozoneI1
A5Cooperation of the group of devicesOnly approved observation tasks

10.1. Impact classes

  1. I0 - contactless. Filming, acoustic observation, mapping and measurement.
  2. I1 - small reversible. Regulated sampling, timestamp, sensor installation. Allowed in an approved mission.
  3. I2 - local technical. Valve overlap, installation of a barrier or sorbent, repair, garbage recovery. Only after confirmation by the operator.
  4. I3 - ecosystem. Chemical treatment, dredging, incorporation or removal of organisms, change of hydrological regime. Autonomous robots are prohibited; a separate project, environmental assessment and permit are required.

10.2. Three independent circuits

  • Mission outline - the route, measurements, processing and execution of the task.
  • Safety contour - depth, collisions, geo-fence, energy, leakage, communication and environmental constraints.
  • Rescue circuit - stop, return, ascent, ballast reset, beacon and search.

10.3. Mandatory restrictions

  • Signed firmware and missions, unique machine identity, log commands and changes;
  • double confirmation of dangerous operations and stopping manipulators in case of loss of communication;
  • geo-zones, limits of depth, time, speed and energy reserve for return;
  • quiet mode near spawning grounds and marine mammals, the limit of active acoustic power;
  • cleaning and disinfection of devices between water bodies to exclude the transfer of pathogens and invasive species;
  • The lack of fully autonomous use of chemical and biological means.

11. Data, communications, registries and evidence

The underwater environment limits the range and speed of communication, so the network is built multi-level. The acoustic channel transmits commands and key telemetry, the optical channel is used at short distances and at the docking station, and the full array of data is stored on board and uploaded on a store-and-forward basis.

11.1. Channels

  • acoustic communication - a distant underwater channel of commands and telemetry;
  • optical communication - high-speed transmission at a short distance;
  • Induction communication - docking and local exchange;
  • fiber optic cable - ROV and stationary observatories;
  • satellite, cellular and radio communication - via buoy or USV;
  • Package priority: Accident -> Device condition -> Warning -> Scientific data.

11.2. Thirteen basic registers

Register architecture links observation, decision, resource, and result. Each object has a permanent ID and version history.

№RegisterKey essence
1Water objectsborders, regime, status and owners
2Watersheds and streamsrunoff, inflows, transport and communications
3HabitatsBottom, coastal and spawning zones
4Types and communitiesbioindicators, eDNA, numbers and migrations
5Load sourceswater intakes, discharges, agriculture, shipping
6Infrastructuredams, pipes, cables, ports and water intakes
7Sensors and stationspassport, calibration, accuracy and condition
8Robotic fleetapparatus, payload, autonomy and tolerances
9Missionsroute, task, teams, log and result
10Samples and laboratorieschain of storage, methods and conclusions
11Events and incidentsanomaly, confirmation, source and risk
12Measures and recoverydecision, executor, resources, state before/after
13Effects and VerificationKPI, evidence, audit ESG-IR and report version

11.3. Quality and compatibility

The EUT establishes uniform measurement passports, minimum metadata, unit directories, coordinate systems, time rules, versioning, exchange interfaces, uncertainty marking, and calibration procedures. For marine sensors and underwater photography are taken into account ISO 22013:2021 and ISO 23731:2021; for AUV and mapping - ISO 20682:2026 and ISO 25451:2026 [6-9].

12. Management cycle and response

The event model eliminates the situation when the signal remains a report without the owner. Each confirmed event is assigned a class, a coordinate, a risk level, a deadline, a responsible and a set of evidence.

  1. Surveillance. A fixed network, satellite or robot detects a deviation from the baseline.
  2. Automatic inspection. The system evaluates the quality of the data, the context of the season, the state of the sensor and possible false reasons.
  3. Confirmation mission. Another sensor, robot, route or control sample is assigned.
  4. Localization. The digital twin combines currents, load sources, and time sequence.
  5. Classification of risk. The scale, exposure, reversibility and urgency are determined.
  6. Decision. The authorized manager selects the acceptable scenario and assigns resources.
  7. Action SPECZASHCHITA or a profile operator performs a technical, organizational or recovery activity.
  8. Control mission. The independent route and the test compare the state before and after.
  9. Verification. ESG-IR confirms achievement KPI and closes the event or returns it for revision.

12.1. GASMP Event Classes

ClassExampleFirst Action
Hydrologicalflood, shallowing, change of currentmodel and exposure areas
Hydrochemicalhypoxia, oil stain, toxicantAdditional profile and test
Biologicalflowering, death of fish, invasive speciesBiomission and laboratory confirmation
TechnogenicLeakage, pipe defect, dam riskROV-Inspection and notification of the owner

principle of independence. The control mission is performed by another apparatus or another measuring channel. Verifier ESG-IR is not organizationally subordinate to the operator receiving payment for the result.

13. Institutional architecture of ecosystem

The water circuit does not create a new department instead of the existing powers. It forms a suprasystemic mechanism for harmonizing data, forecasts, resources, actions and evidence, while maintaining the legal responsibility of authorized bodies and infrastructure owners.

ContourFunctionProduct
ORION 22:22Supersystem navigation and semantic integritya single map of goals and functions
EQUILIBRIUMintegration, digital twin, modeling and forecastingstatus map, scenario and result control
GASMPsatellite, aerospace and inter-territorial surveillanceEarly Warning
SPECZASHCHITApilot and cooperation operator, robotic fleetMission, performance and operation
ECO-PPAResource mobilization and contract resultFinancial model and payments
ESG-IRindicators, evidence and independent verificationVerified Report
EUTunified protocols, data and compatibilitystandards and passports
SFERACommunication, participation and scalingportal, partnerships and public layer
Heritage archiveHistory, origin and preservation of baselinesLong-term evidence loop

13.1. Management bodies

  • Interdepartmental Council - priorities, access to data, regulatory support and scaling solution.
  • Project office SPECZASHCHITA - schedule, procurement, cooperation, missions, safety and operation.
  • Scientific and methodological advice - baseline, bioindicators, models, thresholds and interpretation.
  • Technological consortium - robotics, sensors, communications, energy, service and localization of production.
  • Independent verifier - data verification, KPI, calculation of the effect and compliance with procedures.
  • Authorized bodies - legal decisions, supervision, warning of the population and measures of coercion.

14. Pilot "HYDROSPHERE-1"

Proposed landfill. Syzran node of the Volga and the adjacent water area of the Saratov reservoir. The preliminary scale is 50-100 km of water system. The final boundaries are determined after the survey and approval.

The range is connected to the already formed contour SPECZASHCHITA and should include the main course, small tributaries, coastal zone, industrial and communal load points, natural reference area, hydraulic structures and available underwater infrastructure facilities.

14.1. Basic Robotic Cell

  • network of bottom and coastal sensor nodes;
  • Buy-gate with energy module;
  • docking station;
  • long-term patrol equipment;
  • maneuverable AUV;
  • observation ROV;
  • worker ROV on demand;
  • mobile sampling complex;
  • Coastal Situation Post and Digital Double.

14.2. Stages

StageTimeframeMain resultCheckpoint
1. Passports0-3 monthsboundary, baseline, load map and measurement programthe Test Site Passport
2. Deployment4-6 monthspost, robots, buoys, communication and integrationcomplex ready to work
3. Monitoring7-12 monthsmap of the bottom and habitats, laboratory reconciliation, training modelsConfirmed data quality
4. Prognosis and response13-18 monthsearly warning, source search, monitoring activitiesscripts worked out
5. Verification19-24 monthsaudit ESG-IR, economy, EUT package and standard solutiondecision on scaling

14.3. Products of the pilot

  • digital passport and double water area;
  • map of the bottom, habitats, sources of risk and underwater infrastructure;
  • robotic fleet, docking station and situational post;
  • Early warning system and log of confirmed events;
  • proven methodology of the water ecosystem health index;
  • Verified ESG-IR reporting;
  • EUT standards package and operation economy;
  • standard set of replication for river, lake, marine and Arctic territories.

15. Financial and contract model ECO-PPA

ECO-PPA links the long-term readiness of the infrastructure with the payment of the confirmed result. The model does not transfer uncontrolled natural risks to the operator, but makes it responsible for the performance of the system, the implementation of the observation program, the quality of data and the speed of response.

15.1. Preliminary funding structure of the pilot

SourceSharePurpose
State / Regional Order25%basic infrastructure and open environmental layer
Anchored consumers25%water utilities, industry, energy, ports, GTS
Leasing and manufacturers25%robotics, stations, service and localization
Reserve ECO-PPA15%payment of independently confirmed results
Scientific and environmental programmes10%methods, research and innovation

Interest is a project model and is specified after a technical survey, the calculation of capital and operating costs and the identification of participants.

15.2. Structure of payment to the operator

  • 60% - readiness and scope of services: infrastructure, accessibility, missions and observation program.
  • 25% - quality and SLA: completeness of data, calibration, confirmation and response time.
  • 15% - confirmed effect: prevented damage, reduction of abnormal conditions or restoration of the selected indicator.

15.3. Operational economy

After the pilot, the revenue model is formed from a subscription to monitoring, robotic inspections, emergency survey, service contracts, preparation of evidentiary ESG-IR reporting, maintenance of underwater infrastructure and the provision of verified data for science and management in an acceptable legal regime.

16. Results and ESG-IR-verification

Indicators are divided into system availability, data quality, operational efficiency, safety, environmental condition and economic effect. Environmental goals are set after the baseline so as not to replace the result with a predetermined number.

BlockOffered KPIVerification
Availabilityat least 95% monitoring availabilityJournal of nodes and channels
Coverage100% approved pilot water area mappedMission + Geodata
Securityat least 90% non-violation missions; no secondary harmlog of missions and incidents
QualityKey measurements confirmed by field and laboratory methodsCalibration and Sample Chain
Decisiondispatch solution for confirmed threat up to 30 minutesEvent timestamps
Surveystart of the target mission up to 6 hourslaunch plan and log
SourceLocalization of the probable source in at least 80% confirmed casesModel + Control Sample
Efficiencythe period of underwater survey is reduced by at least 40%Comparison with the basic process
Costunit cost of the surveyed water area is reduced by at least 25%financial model
Financingnot less than 50% extrabudgetary fundscontracts and payments
Evidence100% key KPI have a digital footprintAudit ESG-IR

16.1. Environmental KPI after base line

  • reduction of the duration and area of hypoxia or other target anomalies;
  • reduction of load at selected control points;
  • restoration of connectivity or status of priority habitat;
  • change of the integral index and its domains;
  • Increased preparedness for prevention and reduction of expected damage;
  • lack of transfer of contaminants, pathogens or invasive species by robotic means.

Criteria for closing an event. The event is considered completed not after the completion of work, but after independent confirmation of the required state in the established time window.

17. Roadmap and Scaling

17.1. Horizon 0-24 months

  1. Establish a project office, a scientific and methodological council and an independent verification outline.
  2. Identify the landfill, data owners, legal regimes and reference sites.
  3. Approve the terms of reference for a digital double, GBTM and a robotic cell.
  4. To form a technological consortium and a register of domestic and compatible solutions.
  5. Expand communication, stations, robotic fleet and laboratory circuit.
  6. Conduct a 90-day baseline, followed by an annual cycle of seasonal observations.
  7. To work out at least three scenarios: pollution, biological anomaly and man-made defect.
  8. Conduct ESG-IR audit, economic calculation and scaling decision.

17.2. Horizon 3-5 years

  • creation of a network of typical river, lake, coastal and Arctic polygons;
  • serial production of modular vehicles, stations and docks;
  • National register of aquatic biocenoses and underwater infrastructure;
  • integration with aerospace, climate and extreme contours of GASMP;
  • export of a model solution through international cooperation and SFERA;
  • formation of a market of verified services for the prevention of water damage.

17.3. Conditions of replication

It is not a single robot that is scaled, but an integral cell: the object’s passport, base line, sensors, fleet, communications, digital twin, decision rules, financial contract and independent verification. The configuration changes by water type, but the digital and management architecture remains the same.

18. Expected results

18.1. For the State

  • a single reliable picture of water risks and the state of biocenoses;
  • Early warning and reduction of preventable damage;
  • Interagency compatibility and responsibilities;
  • a tool for prioritizing investments, monitoring programs and assessing the impact;
  • Technological Sovereignty in Underwater Robotics and Sensory.

18.2. For regions and municipalities

  • passport of the water area and a clear map of the sources of load;
  • objective data for water supply, cleaning, floods and recreation;
  • rapid diagnosis of hard-to-reach areas and underwater structures;
  • attraction of extra-budgetary funds through ECO-PPA.

18.3. For science and industry

  • long-term verified data series and full-scale polygons;
  • order for sensors, devices, communications, energy, materials and software;
  • comparable eDNA, hydroacoustics, imaging and robotic sampling techniques;
  • accelerated testing of new technologies in a controlled legal regime.

18.4. For man and nature

  • clean and accessible water;
  • conservation of habitats, fish resources and biodiversity;
  • Less risk of accidents, pollution and hidden accumulation of damage;
  • transparent evidentiary information about the state of the territory;
  • transition from the elimination of consequences to the restoration of the viability of water systems.

Strategic outcome. It is not a water monitoring system that is being created, but an infrastructure for preserving and restoring a living hydrosphere, in which data, robotics, management and financing form a single closed cycle.

Annex A. Hydroecosystem passport

Passport sectionMandatory content
Identificationcode, name, type, coordinates, boundaries, swimming pool, legal status
Hydrologylevel, flow rate, water exchange, currents, temperature, ice, seasonality
Hydrochemistrybasic and special indicators, background, thresholds, uncertainty
Biocenosishabitats, species, indicators, eDNA, trophic bonds
Bottom and shorerelief, precipitation, erosion, pollution and sensitive areas
LoadWater intakes, discharges, agriculture, transport and population
InfrastructureGTS, pipes, cables, ports, water intakes, treatment
ObservationGBTM, stations, routes, sensors, laboratories and communications
Risksscenarios, exposure, responsible, timing and resources
Indicatorsreference line, I_GE, R, L, D, G and environmental KPI
Historyevents, measures, model versions, control and ESG-IR-audit

Annex B. Robotic mission card

  • Mission ID, date, customer and authorized manager;
  • purpose, hypothesis, area, geo-fence, depth and time window;
  • device, payload, firmware versions and tasks;
  • route, energy budget, reserve and communication loss scenario;
  • autonomy class A0-A5 and permissible exposure class I0-I3;
  • sensors, calibration, frequency and quality criteria;
  • rules for detection, confirmation and reassignment of the route;
  • Biota protection measures, acoustic limitations and disinfection;
  • a chain of data, samples and laboratory results;
  • Summary, deviations, incidents, control mission and closure decision.

Annex B. Minimum base line program

  1. Inventory of water body, catchment, sources of load and infrastructure.
  2. Seasonal and daily profiles of physical and hydrochemical parameters.
  3. Bathymetry, bottom sediments and a map of key habitats.
  4. Bioindication: plankton, benthos, fish, macrophytes, eDNA and acoustic background.
  5. Control and reference areas, laboratory reconciliation and uncertainty assessment.
  6. Verification of communication, autonomy, return of devices and failure scenarios.
  7. Assessment of natural variability and setting thresholds for events.
  8. Calculation of initial I_GE, R, L, D and G, environmental approval KPI.

Official sources and methodological framework

Relevance of links and statuses checked for 26 August 2026. Sources are used as a methodological basis; specific mandatory requirements are determined by applicable legislation, water area conditions and approved technical specifications.

  • [1] WMO. State of Global Water Resources 2024 (2025). Official page
  • [2] UN-Water. Progress on Water-related Ecosystems - 2024 Update. Official page
  • [3] IOC/UNESCO. State of the Ocean Report 2024. Official page
  • [4] GOOS / IOC-UNESCO. Global Ocean Observing System: 2030 Strategy. Official page
  • [5] IOC-UNESCO OBIS. OBIS 2030: The Biodiversity Data Hub for the Ocean Decade Actions. Official page
  • [6] ISO 22013:2021. Marine environment sensor performance - General requirements. Official page
  • [7] ISO 23731:2021. In situ image-based surveys in deep seafloor environments. Official page
  • [8] ISO 20682:2026. Autonomous underwater vehicles - Risk and reliability. Official page
  • [9] ISO 25451:2026. Seafloor mapping with uncrewed marine vehicles. Official page
  • [10] IMO. MEPC.1/Circ.906/Rev.1. Underwater noise from shipping (2025). Official page
  • [11] GOOS. Essential Ocean Variables. Official page
  • [12] NOAA IOOS. QARTOD - Quality Assurance of Real-Time Oceanographic Data. Official page
  • [13] NOAA Ocean Exploration. Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. Official page

Conclusion

HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM connects what exists today separately: water observation, assessment of living communities, underwater infrastructure survey, robotic missions, digital forecasting, resource mobilization and proof of outcome.

The system shifts control from episodic sampling and response to continuous understanding, early warning and controlled recovery. Its basic product is a healthy, monitored and protected hydroecosystem with a digital passport, a responsible process owner and a verifiable history of change.

The next organizational step - pre-project survey of the landfill "HYDROSPHERE-1", approval of the scientific program of the basic line and the formation of a technological consortium SPECZASHCHITA.

Other published edition: HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM GIDROSFERA_EQUILIBRIUM_Strategicheskaya_prezentatsiya.pptx · Web Text +

Biocenosis of water resources and underwater robotics

Water contour GASMP

Data → digital twin → solution → proven effect

PROJECT ORION22:22

Water - a strategic contour of security and development

STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK

One resource simultaneously determines the viability of ecosystems, territories and economies.

Cities

and industry

Environmental

Sustainability

Water intake • production

biodiversity • climate

WATER

Food

and energy

infrastructure

Life

agricultural sector • hydropower

Health

Population

Warning

Damage

drinking water • sanitation

Floods • Accidents • drought

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

Data is separate from decisions

THE PROBLEM

Measurements accumulate, but the source of the threat is localized late, and the effect of actions is often not proven.

DATA FRAGMENTS

IMPLICATIONS

Threat detected after fact

laboratory tests

reaction after damage accumulation

buoys and hydroposts

There is no single causal model

DIVISIONS

Satellite observations

data does not add up to the route of action

Infrastructure Inspections

Result not verified

Unable to link payment to effect

Incident reports

Need a closed circuit: fact → solution → action → check

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

EQUILIBRIUM locks control in a single cycle

SYSTEM FORMULA

Watch

Verify

Recognise

DIGITAL DOUBLE

+ Rules of decision

+ independent verification

Return

to the norm

Forecast

Action

Notify

Resources

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

HYDROSPHERE - water module EQUILIBRIUM and GASMP

ARCHITECTURE

Monitoring becomes management after the action is assigned and the result is verified

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

Hydroecosystem - more than water sample

OBJECT OF MANAGEMENT

The result unit receives boundaries, baseline, health index, process owners, and history of change.

Water

Bottom Wednesday

Biota

Level • Current • Temperature • Chemistry

relief • precipitation • gassing • objects

plankton • benthos • fish • eDNA

Coastal Belt

Man and economy

Management

floodplains • spawning grounds • vegetation

water intake • dumping • shipping

Modes • Owners • Laboratory • Service

The final metric is the viability of the water system, not a separate sensor reading.

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

Five levels give a continuous picture - from the pool to the sample

OBSERVATION

01 PLANETARY

water balance • temperature • ice • large pollution

02 POOL

Runoff • floods • drought • transfer between territories

03 AQUATORIAL

water body • bottom • habitat • infrastructure

04 LOCAL

loading source • water intake • dam • pipeline

05 MICRO-LEVEL

sample • biofilm • microorganism • defect

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

Health index reveals cause, not hides it

MEASUREMENT

Hydrology

Hydrochemistry

0–100

Water Mode

Quality of environment

IGE = Σ wᵢ × Sᵢ

Biota

Functions

Scales are calibrated on reference plots and a 90-day base line.

Living Community

Work of ecosystem

Connectivity

Resiliency

R Risk L Load

D Data quality

G Readiness E Effect

Continuity of habitats

return to normal

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

Mobile sense organ - and controlled action

UNDERWORK ROBOTOTECHNIKA

AUV

mapping and search

ROV

Inspection and sampling

USV

communication, energy, support

Glider

Long-term profiles

Fleet + stations + laboratories + digital twin

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

Autonomy of movement ≠ The autonomy of a dangerous decision

SAFETY

AUTONOMOUS LEVELS A0-A5

CLASS OF IMPACT

A0

Manual

A1

Course / Depth

A2

route

A3

Mission

A4

new

route

A5

Group

surveillance

Reversible Selection

Automation increases coverage, but does not extend legal exposure tolerance.

Local Operation

THREE INDEPENDENT CONTOURS

ecosystem intervention

Mission

Security

Salvation

route • measurement • processing

Geofence • energy • collision

Stop • Return • Ascent

I2 - only after confirmation by the operator

I3 - Autonomous robots banned

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

Measurements are converted into assigned action

DIGITAL DOUBLE

Not a map for the sake of a map, but an explainable model: what is happening, why, what will happen next and what to do.

Hydrodynamics

Hydrochemistry

level • current • carry

Oxygen • Biogens • Toxicants

DIGITAL

DOUBLE

Ecology

Infrastructure and risk

Habitats • Population • Functions

Dam • Pipes • Ports • Accidents

Who to check → where → when → by which device → according to which protocol → how to confirm recovery

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

The system detects four classes of events in advance

Early warning

Priority is determined by the dynamics of risk, and not only by the fact of exceeding an individual indicator.

HYDROLOGY

HYDROCHEMICALS

BIOLOGY

TECHNOGENIC

Flooding

drought

Grinding

petroleum products

Heavy Metals

Deficiency O₂

Flowering

Pathogens

Invasive species

Leak

Defect of pipe

GTS risk

Forecast + route

source localization

bioprofile + sample

ROV-inspection

Event = anomaly + independent confirmation by other channel

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

Roles come together without creating a new agency

GOVERNANCE

Legal responsibility remains with the authorized bodies; the supersystem agrees on data, resources, actions and evidence.

ORION 22:22

Strategic Design and Coordination

≤ 30 MIN

EQUILIBRIUM

Digital double and control scenarios

dispatching solution

the Confirmed Threat

GASMP

Observation and early warning

SPECZASHCHITA

Pilot, Cooperative and Fleet Operator

ECO-PPA

resources, result contract and payments

≤ 6 HOURS

ESG-IR

independent verification of indicators and effect

Start of target

Robotic Mission

EUT

Compatibility of data, equipment and procedures

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

50–100 km

PILOT

"HYDROSPHERE-1" checks the full circuit for 24 months

SYZRAN Knot VOLGA / SRATOVSKAYA WATER

ROBOTISED CELL

• Bottom and shore sensors

• Buy Gateway and Dock Station

• Long-range patrol vehicle

• maneuverable AUV and observant ROV

• mobile sampling

• the Situation Post + Digital Double

the Water System

reference section inflow load GTS underwater facility

availability

Missions without violations

source localization

Extrabudgetary

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

The pilot goes through five control stages.

ROAD MAP

Each stage ends with the product being tested and the decision to move on.

0–3 months

4–6 months

7–12 months

13–18 months

19–24 months

Passports

Deployment

Observation

Prognosis and reaction

Verification

Borders • base line

Measurement Program

Post • robots • buoys

Communication and integration

bottom map • biota

Model Training

Warning

search for source

ESG-IR • economy

EUT Package

Passport accepted

The complex is ready

Quality confirmed

scripts worked out

decision on scale

Scales not a single robot, but a complete cell with regulations and verification

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

Payment is related to availability, quality and effect

FINANCIAL MODEL

PILOT FINANCING STRUCTURE

PAYMENT TO THE OPERATOR

State / Regional Order

readiness and scope of services

Anchored consumers

Leasing and manufacturers

data quality and SLA

Reserve ECO-PPA

Confirmed effect

Scientific and environmental programmes

Preliminary design model; shares are specified after examination and calculation CAPEX/OPEX.

Operation: monitoring subscription • robotic inspection • emergency survey • ESG-IR-report

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

Run 90-day pre-project phase

DECISION

The goal is to prepare the basis for the GO / NO-GO pilot "HYDROSPHERE-1".

DAYS

DAYS

DAYS

DAYS

Assign

Customer and Operator

Forming a consortium

the Scientific Council

Approve the water area,

indicators and data mode

Prepare a feasibility study, budget,

TC and ECO-PPA

Technical feasibility • economy • legal regime • cooperatives • solution GO / NO-GO

TO 90-MU DAY

ORION22:22 / EQUILIBRIUM

Sources cited in presentation 27

  • The initial strategic concept of "HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM", 2026.
  • Cover illustration: OpenAI image generation, 26.08.2026.
  • [/Sources]
  • WMO, State of Global Water Resources 2024: https://wmo.int/resources/publication-series/state-of-global-water-resources/state-of-global-water-resources-2024
  • UN-Water, Progress on Water-related Ecosystems 2024: https://www.unwater.org/publications/progress-water-related-ecosystems-2024-update
  • UN-Water, Progress on Ambient Water Quality 2024: https://www.unwater.org/publications/progress-ambient-water-quality-2024-update
  • The initial strategic concept "HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM", sections 1, 11–12.
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, sections 1 and 12.
  • The initial strategic concept of "HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM", figure 1 and section 5.
  • GOOS 2030 Strategy: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368020
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, section 2.
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, sections 3 and 5.
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, section 6.
  • The initial strategic concept "HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM", figure 2 and sections 8–9.
  • NOAA Ocean Exploration, AUV overview: https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/technology/subs-auvs/
  • ISO 20682:2026, AUV vocabulary: https://www.iso.org/standard/86398.html
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, section 10.
  • IMO underwater radiated noise resources: https://glonoise.imo.org/documents/2524
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, section 7.
  • GOOS Essential Ocean Variables: https://goosocean.org/what-we-do/framework/essential-ocean-variables/
  • NOAA QARTOD quality assurance: https://ioos.noaa.gov/project/qartod/
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, sections 4 and 12.
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, sections 13 and 16.
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, sections 14 and 16.
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, sections 14 and 17.
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, section 15.
  • The initial strategic concept of HYDROSPHERE EQUILIBRIUM, sections 14 and 17; the road map of the pre-project phase is prepared for presentation.

Published files

Ecology · Full published text

Dynamic Model of the Biosphere

Source Status: Primary Document

Linking the dynamic model of the biosphere, the new financial system and the Heritage Preservation Archive.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/dinamicheskaya-model-biosfery

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA · ECO-PPA · SPECZASHCHITA · ARCHIVE OF HERITAGE

Author: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · 29 August 2026

Pilot outline: Syzran — Rameno — Smolkino

Status: author's project hypothesis for expert discussion

02 / SUMMARY FOR DECISION-MAKING

One solution: allow 90-day testing

Check the coherence of the scientific, project, contractual, financial and archival contours in a mode without the movement of money.

Main thesis
Money should not follow a declaration, but the conventionally fixed, measurable and replicable dynamics of the biosphere; the knowledge, the basis of decisions and the results of each cycle are preserved as heritage.

ParameterProposal
Timeframe for the first stage90 calendar days.
TerritoriesSyzran - Rameno - Smolkino; the functions of the sites are determined only after examination.
ModeShadow mode: The system calculates scenarios and project gateways, but does not initiate payments.
WithdrawalReference line, model 0.1, passport ECO-PPA, legal card, evidence package, test archive package, independent opinion.
Next stepSeparate decision on the 12-month field pilot: GO/conditional GO/NO-GO.

Expected result
Not a presentation of the “ideal system”, but proof of what parts are working, where gaps remain and under what conditions a limited pilot is acceptable.

03 / DEFINITIONS AND BORDERS

Novelty is in connectedness, not in the release of money

A dynamic model of the biosphere. an information and analytical layer of observations, connections, scenarios, forecasts and uncertainties; a decision support system, not a source of a legally binding solution.

New World Financial System. the working name of the internationally compatible design and proof layer on top of the existing currencies, accounts, contracts, banks, treasuries and development institutions.

Heritage Archive: Distributed layer of long-term memory, origin of data, rights, versions, decisions, evidence, and academic reuse; originals remain with legal custodians.

The key boundary
The model recommends. The authorized subject makes a decision. A bank, treasury or party to a contract executes a lawful order. An independent validator verifies the result. The archive maintains an evidence chain.

  • The proposed architecture does not replace national money, central banks, the banking system, fiscal, tax, statistical or accounting regulation.
  • The system does not issue legal tender and does not create the right to automatically receive funding.
  • The materials do not contain promises of profitability, guarantees of return of capital or a statement of no risks.
  • An environmental result is not equivalent to a monetary value without a separate legal methodology, independent evaluation and contractual basis.
  • Architecture is not declared a global, national or industry standard. At the first stage, this is a testable project hypothesis and a subject of limited approbation.

04 / WHY NOW

Risk is becoming systemic and data is becoming more distributed

The facts set the scale of the task, but do not prove the effectiveness of the proposed architecture before approbation.

ObservationSignificance for designOfficial source
2025: about +1.43 °C relative to 1850–1900; 2015–2025 are the eleven warmest years.We need long series, model versions, and work with uncertainty.WMO, 2026
119 countries, about 60% reported multi-hazard early warning systems.The warning should end with readiness, action and verification of the result.WMO, 2025
Target 19: Global goal to mobilize at least 200 billion Annex II US dollars per year 2030 from all sources.This is a system benchmark, not a promise of funds for a specific project.CBD
Natural risks are seen as credit, market and operational; data and methodologies gaps persist.Limited KPI, origin of data and independent verification are needed.NGFS, 2026

Sources: WMO State of the Global Climate 2025; WMO Global Status of MHEWS 2025; CBD Target 19; NGFS 2026 Nature Package.

Conclusion
There is no shortage of individual platforms and indicators. Deficit - in compatible cycle "surveillance → solution → contract → action → verification → memory".

05 / PRINCIPLES

Seven principles keep the system in the legal and scientific field

1. Sovereignty: National powers, money, registries, and legal regimes are maintained.

2. Separation of roles. the performer does not approve his own result alone.

3. Origin: Each statement is related to the source, method, time, rights, and version.

4. Water, soil, biota, health and money are linked by an identifier, but are not automatically reduced to a single index.

5. Reproducibility. output can be recovered from the original data, transformations and model version.

6. A person makes a decision. AI and the model form an offer, but do not authorize payment, scientific attribution or restriction of rights.

7. The positive, negative, and zero effects persist and affect the next cycle.

System Motto
Sovereignty remains. The evidence becomes compatible. Actions are agreed.

06 / ARCHITECTURE

The five circuits form a closed loop.

ContourFunctionA hard border
EQUILIBRIUMObservation, recognition, analysis, scenarios, forecast, uncertainty assessment.It does not control the money and does not turn the forecast into a mandatory decision.
SFERAInitiatives, participants, knowledge, feedback and scaling verified.Not a bank, not a regulator, not a CEO.
ECO-PPAPassport tasks, technologies, cooperations, capital, contract, data and result.Project-resource and contractual framework; not the executor.
SPECZASHCHITACo-operative execution assembly, pilots, logistics and scaling.It does not validate its own results alone.
Heritage archiveMemory, origin, versions, rights, evidence, academic integration.It does not replace the expertise, state archives and owners of records.

OBSERVATION → FORECAST → DECISION → ECO-PPA → AGREEMENT → EXECUTION → VERIFICATION → ARCHIVE → MASSTABING → NEW CYCLE

Invariant
The heritage archive is located after checking and simultaneously serves the entire cycle: the baseline, rights and historical series should be available before the decision, and the final package after the result.

07 / DYNAMIC MODEL OBJECT

Biocenosis is considered as a natural, social, infrastructure and production system

xₜ = [Aₜ, Wₜ, Sₜ, Bₜ, Hₜ, Lₜ]ᵀ

A is the atmosphere; W - water; S is the soil; B is biota; H - effects on humans; L is the technogenic load.

LayerWhat is observedWhy One Source is Not Enough
Atmosphereweather, gases, aerosols, pollutants, fires and smokeThe satellite sees the distribution; ground stations and calibration specify the concentrations.
Waterlevel, consumption, seasonality, quality, biogenics, toxicantsRemote signs are supplemented by samples, hydro stations and laboratories.
Soilcarbon, pH, humidity, erosion, salinity, compaction, pollutionField and laboratory control is mandatory for processes below the surface.
Biotaecosystem status, population, connectivity, invasions, productivityThe number of species does not describe the functions, numbers, and genetic diversity.
Personexposure, safe water, sanitation, food, vulnerabilityExposure is not equal to the proven causality of the disease.
Loadland use, emissions, water abstraction, waste, accidents, material flowsThe administrative, production and observable data have different completeness.

The scientific framework is compatible with One Health, observation systems GEO and spatial ecosystem accounts SEEA EA.

08 / INDICATORS PANEL

Each indicator receives a passport, not just a number

Passport BlockMinimum content
Identificationcode, name, object, geometry, period and time step
Methoddefinition, unit, instrument or algorithm, selection protocol, calibration
Sourceowner of record, primary file, date of receipt, license and access mode
QualityQA/QC, completeness, detection limit, uncertainty, fitness status
Comparisonbaseline, seasonality, trend, warning threshold, counterfactual scenario
Responsibilitywho measures, verifies, interprets, decides and disputes
Archivechecksum, version, conversion events and reference to archive object

Panel Rule
One integral “biosphere health index” should not hide the deterioration of one contour after the improvement of another. The basis remains a set of non-mixable indicators with explicit weights only where it is legally and methodically justified.

Global planetary boundaries may specify a system risk corridor, but are not local regulations, MACs, or automatic project thresholds.

09 / DYNAMICS, Scenarios AND INDEEDICITY

Model separates observation, calculation and prediction

xₜ₊Δₜ = fθ(xₜ, uₜ, eₜ) + εₜ

uₜ - controlled impact; eₜ - external factors; εₜ - uncertainty. The function and parameters have versions.

Impactᵢ = xᵒᵇˢᵉʳᵛᵉᵈᵢ,ₜ₁ − xᶜᵒᵘⁿᵗᵉʳᶠᵃᶜᵗᵘᵃˡᵢ,ₜ₁

The effect is published along with baseline, uncertainty range, assumptions, and the counterfactual evaluation method.

Data classStatusPermissible use
Primary dimensionInvariable source recordBase of evidence
Purified dataversion with a transformation loganalysis with the stored connection to the primary source
Estimated valueThe result of the approved formulaComparison and control with a known method
Forecast / ScenarioProbability statementsupport for the decision, but not confirmed fact
Decisionthe Act of the Authorized Subjectstart, change, stop or pay by contract

Prohibition
Correlation does not prove causality. The signal of the model or sensor does not create the right to automatic payment.

10 / PASSPORT ECO-PPA

One identifier links task, resources, contract and result

Pᵢ = TASK ⊗ TECHNOLOGY ⊗ COOPERATION ⊗ CAPITAL ⊗ CONTRACT ⊗ DATA ⊗ RESULTS

The sign ⊗ means binding rather than arithmetic multiplication.

ComponentThe control question
TaskWho is the owner of the problem, where are the boundaries and what is the initial state?
TechnologyWhat impact is being offered, what are the safety, maturity and alternatives?
CooperationWho designs, performs, delivers, observes and validates?
CapitalWhat are the legal sources, budget, reserve and terms of return?
ContractWhat are the works, deadlines, acceptances, covenants, rights, responsibilities and foundations of tranches?
DataWhat is baseline, KPI, method, rights, quality, uncertainty and archival link?
ResultWhat statements are admissible after independent verification and who approves them?

Ready(Pᵢ) = ∏ bᵢₖ, bᵢₖ ∈ {0,1}

The project is ready to launch only if all seven components are available; ECO-PPA does not perform work.

11 / FINANCIAL CONTOUR

Regulated money passes through a regular contract and verifiable gateways

The Pilot's Formula
Regulated money + Ordinary financing agreement + passport of the territory/project + limited set KPI + Independent MRV + Heritage Archive = pilot of evidence-based funding of the biosphere result.

ElementDesign of the first pilot
Money and AccountsExisting currency; regulated bank or treasury account; KYC/AML, tax and accounting contour.
SourcesBudget, grant, own funds, loan or funds of the development institution - only on a separate legal basis.
UseWorks, equipment, monitoring, independent validation, archive, management and reserve.
TranshiFor confirmed works; a small pre-limited outlet transaction is only possible from the sponsor's funds after an independent review.
Digital passportReference project identifier in data and documents; not a means of payment, not a security, and not a pledge.
Prohibition of the first stageNo issue of currency, token or security; no automatic movement of money.

BIS 2026 retains public money anchor, legal finality of settlement and interoperability; NGFS Linking Natural Risks to Conventional Financial Categories.

12 / FOUR SYNCHRONIZED REGISTERS

Nature, money, evidence and decisions are connected, but not mixed.

Lᵢ = Lᵐᵒⁿᵉʸᵢ ∥ Lᵇⁱᵒˢᵖʰᵉʳᵉᵢ ∥ Lᵉᵛⁱᵈᵉⁿᶜᵉᵢ ∥ Lᵈᵉᶜⁱˢⁱᵒⁿᵢ

RegisterContainsDoes not mean
Moneysources, limits, payments, reserve, balance refund, reconciliationmonetary valuation of each natural change
Biospherebaseline, observations, time series, scenarios and result indicatorsAutomatic Causality or “One Health”
Evidenceprimary data, method, conversion, verification, rights and origincertification without an authorized body
Decisionsmandates, permissions, acceptance, adjustments, payment, stop, challengeAutomatic execution of model signal

Sourcesᵢ = Paymentsᵢ + Reserveᵢ + UnusedOrReturnedᵢ

The main prohibition
An environmental indicator cannot be automatically converted into a monetary value without a legitimate valuation methodology, independent valuation and contractual basis.

13 / FLOW OF DATA AND EVIDENCE

The data tolerance precedes the calculation and approval of the result

d* = ⟨id, time, geo, source, method, unit, rights, hash, version, signature⟩

Adm(d) = Schema ∧ Integrity ∧ Rights ∧ Provenance ∧ Quality

1. Receiving. satellites, sensors, laboratories, field surveys, statistics and local knowledge on the permitted mode.

2. Control. scheme, integrity, calibration, completeness, detection limit, units and geography.

3. Division. primary, purified, computational, predictive and managerial are stored as different classes.

4. Calculation. algorithm version, parameters, source files and conversion log.

5. Independent review of method, data, outcome and conflict of interest.

6. Archiving. evidence package, rights, checksums and storage events.

Inviolability of the source
Derived data never overwrites the primary record; the authoritative source remains the owner of the record.

14 / SOLUTION FLOW AND PROTECTION MECHANISMS

The model does not close the control circuit on itself

Payment ⇒ Contract ∧ AuthorizedDecision ∧ AdmissibleEvidence

ClaimedResult ⇒ Baseline ∧ Method ∧ Provenance ∧ Validation ∧ Archive

ModelOutput ⇏ AutomaticPayment

GatewayQuestion answeredPossible solution
LegalIs there a mandate, permissions, data rights and contractual basis?allow / return / stop
ScientificIs the method, baseline, and uncertainty replicable?accept the method / request revision
TechnicalIs the technology, operation and control plan safe?Allow Limited Volume / Deny
FinancialIs the budget balanced, is the work confirmed and covenants complied with?pay / withhold / return
EvidentiaryIs the review independent and will we restore the package from the Archive?confirm approval / limit wording

Human-in-command
AI can look for inconsistencies and offer connections. Scientific attribution, access to limited materials and financial order remain with authorized persons and organizations.

15 / ARCHIVE HERITAGE

Archive saves not only the result, but also the basis of choice

Purpose
Preservation, evidence, managed access and reuse. The common layer stores identifiers, metadata, saved copies, and access rules; the originals remain with the legal custodians.

CollectionComposition
1. Historicalmaps, observations, initial states and long time series
2. Scientificpublications, methodologies, models, code, parameters and experimental data
3. Engineeringtechnologies, projects, production experience, operational data
4. Natural and culturalobject descriptions and traditional knowledge with media rights and access control
5. Legal and contractualmandates, authorizations, contracts, decisions and financial bases
6. Evidentiaryprimary measurements, model versions, validation and result protocols
7. Lessonserrors, negative and zero results, rejected scenarios and reasons for stopping

Key principle
Who owned the knowledge? On what data is the decision made? What's changed? Can the conclusion be reproduced? These issues become part of the storage facility.

16 / ARCHIVE ARCHIVE

Long-term storage is built as a managed life cycle

SIP —Reception + QA→ AIP —Access Policy→ DIP

SIP - transmission package; AIP - archive package; DIP - issuance package. The architecture is guided by the principles of OAIS, but is not declared a certified OAIS system.

ContourFunction
Management and receptionmandate, selection, contract of transfer, rights, ethics and registration
Physical safetystorage conditions, conservation, inventory, safety
Digitizationmaster copy, derivative formats, quality control and equipment fixation
Long-term storagereplication, checksums, migrations, conservation and recovery events
Description and knowledgepassports, communications, ontologies, origin, versions and citations
Academic useresearch requests, analysis, publications, return of enriched data
Access and sustainabilitypublic, research, restricted and closed mode; issue log and disaster recovery

Landmarks: ISO 14721:2025 OAIS — Reference Model; PREMIS — objects, events, agents and rights; W3C PROV-O - Entities, actions and responsible agents.

17 / ACADEMIC INTEGRATION AND RIGHTS

Scientific turnover is closed by the return of proven knowledge to the Archive

REQUEST → THE PROBLEM → METHOD → DATA → CONCLUSION → PUBLICATION → ENCOURAGEMENT ARCHIVE → REPEATED CHECK

ParticipantRoleLimitation
Academic institutionsmethods, expertise, research and preparation of collectionsDo not receive exclusive rights to other people's primary records
LabsMeasurements, Calibration, QA/QC and Protocolsdo not hide the method, detection limits and uncertainty
Guardians and CommunitiesIdentification, context, rights, access and consentknowledge is not alienated or monetized without a legal basis
Independent Validatorsverification of method, data and statementsnot participate in the execution of the audited works
SFERAsearch for competencies and publication of permitted resultsdoes not disclose private materials and personal data

Rights and Ethics
Traditional knowledge, genetic resources, and digital information are considered with consent, benefit-sharing, licenses, personal data, trade secrets, and other applicable regimes. The archive does not turn a legacy into a freely alienable financial asset.

18 / OFFICE AND DIVISION OF CREDENTIALS

Role independence is more important than technological convenience

RoleAnswersDoes not perform alone
Owner of the territory / customerMandate, admissions, acceptance and responsible decisionEx post facto change of evidence
EQUILIBRIUManalysis, model, scenarios, warnings and uncertaintyFinancial Order
ECO-PPAintegrity of passport, contract, resources, data and resultphysical performance
SPECZASHCHITAcooperation, work, logistics, security and report of the contractorindependent validation
Financial Instituteaccount, payment discipline and legal proceduresEnvironmental Attribution
Independent Validatormethodology, data, conflict of interest and result formulationexecution of the audited project
Heritage archiveorigin, version, rights, custody and extraditionsubstitution of the owner of the record or scientific examination

Conflict of interest rule
Execution, acceptance, validation and disposal of funds should have separate powers, logs of actions and a challenge procedure.

19 / PILOT CONTOUR OF TERRITORY

Syzran — Rameno — Smolkino: first examination, then functions

Warning
The package does not assign previously unconfirmed environmental characteristics to the territories and does not promise a specific effect before the survey, baseline and technology selection.

SiteMandatory surveyExit 90 days
Syzranmandate, borders, water, soil, biota, load, infrastructure, data sources and rightsverified territory profile and list of permissible tasks
Ramenothe same unified protocol; local features are fixed only by datacomparable profile, data gaps and observation scenarios
Smolkinothe same unified protocol; the fixation of historical and cultural materials is mandatorycomparable profile and the first package of the Heritage Archive
  • Unified system of coordinates and identifiers of sites.
  • General definitions of indicators with local methodologies and thresholds.
  • Synchronous access rights, journal of origin and archive directory.
  • Separate baseline and solutions for each site; prohibition of averaging critical risks.

Goal
Check not the "ideal territory", but the portability of the evidence circuit between three different local contexts.

20 / 90-DAY APPLICATION

First stage checks architecture without financial risk

TimeframeWorksResult
1–10mandate, working group, owners of data and territories, legal boundariesCharter and RACI
11–25inventory of data, historical materials and access rightsthe Data Register and the first SIP Archive
26–40baseline, index dictionary, model 0.1three passports of the sites and a common passport of the contour
41–55scenarios, technologies, cooperation and risksImpact options without unconfirmed promises
56–70ECO-PPA, source/use budget and contractual gatewayspassport, term sheet and test registers
71–82control measurements and full-cycle trainingevidence package and test AIP
83–90independent reviewGO / conditional GO / NO-GO by field pilot

Shadow mode
The system calculates possible solutions and forms documents, but does not move money. Only voluntary cases are allowed, access to which is legally granted.

The success criterion of the stage is the reproducibility of the full package, and not a positive environmental effect, which requires field execution and a sufficient observation period.

21 / CONDITIONAL 12-MONTHLY PILOT

Field execution begins only after a separate GO

MonthControl work
1–2complete baseline, survey, permits and observation system
3engineering solutions, preliminary registration of indicators and methods
4contracts, accounts, sources of funds and procurement procedures
5–8limited execution, security control and tranches for accepted works
9intermediate measurement and adaptive solution of the authorized body
10re-measurement and comparison with a counter-factual scenario
11independent validation, financial reconciliation and archiving
12solution: scale, modify, repeat or stop

Transhi
The main payment is for contractually confirmed works. An outcome transaction, if legally provided, is pre-limited and paid only after an independent inspection and the decision of the authorized party.

Negative result
It can confirm the workability of the proof circuit, but is not the basis for scaling inefficient or unsafe technology.

22 / GO / CONDITIONAL GO / NO-GO

Eight critical locks must be closed simultaneously.

GatewayMinimum proof
Rightmandate, permits, contract and permissibility of the financial scheme
Securityenvironmental and technical assessment, stop and response plan
Decision ownerAuthority, acceptance and challenge procedure
Data rightsconsents, licenses, access, privacy and rights of knowledge holders
BaselineMeasurable baseline, seasonality, gaps and uncertainty
BudgetSources = Use + Reserve + Refund balance
Independenceseparation of execution, acceptance, validation and payment order
Archivepackage can be restored and issued according to the established mode

Draft decision
Create a working group; approve 90- day-long testing in shadow mode; appoint data owners and solutions 90-day to consider an independent opinion and separately decide on the issue of 12-monthly pilot.

GO requires the closure of all critical gateways. Conditional GO is allowed only with avoidable comments with responsible and deadlines. One unopened critical gateway means NO-GO.

23 / RISKS AND CONTROL MEASURES

Strong architecture starts with a clear description of failures

RiskMonitoring
Model confidence looks like a factprobabilities, intervals, versions, counterfactual method and expert solution
One KPI hides damage to another circuitUnmixable indicators panel and prohibition of automatic compensation
Double counting of resultssingle project ID, geography, period, rights to approve and search for intersections
Automation of payment by sensorfour locks: contract, acceptance, evidence, authorized order
The perpetrator checks himselfOrganizational and contractual independence of the validator
Loss of history and negative datamandatory Heritage Archive, checksums and conservation policy
Violation of the rights to traditional knowledgeconsent, access mode, benefit-sharing and right of withdrawal within applicable limits
The name is perceived as a promise of a new currency.permanent legal reservation and prohibition of emissions on the pilot

Document status
Author's concept. Legal, financial, metrological, environmental and archival conclusions arise only after independent verification of specific cases.

24 / SOURCES AND MANDATORY LIMITATIONS

Official base and rules of interpretation

Direct links; access verified 29 August 2026

WMO — State of the Global Climate 2025

WMO — Global Status of Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems 2025

WMO — Early Warnings for All

GEO — Global Earth Observation System of Systems

WHO — One Health

FAO — Global Soil Biodiversity Observatory

UN — SEEA Ecosystem Accounting

IPBES — Nexus Assessment

NGFS — 2026 Nature Package

TNFD — Recommendations

BIS — Annual Economic Report 2026, monetary architecture

CBD — Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, Target 19

IFRS Foundation — biodiversity, ecosystems and ecosystem services project

ISO — ISO 14721:2025, OAIS reference model

Library of Congress — PREMIS Data Dictionary

W3C — PROV-O: The PROV Ontology

ISO — ISO/IEC 17029:2019, validation and verification principles

CBD — Nagoya Protocol

Rules of interpretation
OAIS is a reference model, not a ready IT system. TNFD, SEEA EA and other frameworks are used as benchmarks for compatibility within their purpose. No link means certification of the proposed architecture or binding on a particular jurisdiction.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · EQUILIBRIUM — SFERA — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA — Heritage Archive

Other published edition: Dynamic model of the biosphere Dinamicheskaya_model_biosfery_Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema_Arkhiv_naslediya.pptx · web text +

New world financial system with a contour "Archive of Heritage"

Sovereignty remains.

The evidence becomes compatible.

Actions are agreed.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Solution now — 90-day verification

REQUEST FOR SOLUTION

Boundaries and powers

Agree objects, data owners, legal routes and stop conditions.

Pass-through passport

DAYS

Collect one ECO-PPA: task, data, contract, control and result.

not deployment,

a Controllability Check

Evidence

Carry out a dry run of gates, independent validation and archiving.

12-month pilot - only after GO proved

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The system coordinates projects without replacing institutions

MODEL BORDERS

What is it?

What it is not

  • Contractual design and accounting layer over legal money.
  • Complementary evidence of the state of the biosphere and the result.
  • Data versions, access rights, decision thresholds and liability traces.
  • Not a new currency and not an emission center.
  • Not a replacement for central banks, budgets or national accounts.
  • Not a proclaimed global standard.
  • No guarantee of profitability or environmental impact.
  • Not a certificate of legal compliance.

Sovereignty remains. The evidence is compatible. Action agreed.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Today, data, decisions and funding diverge.

THE PROBLEM

DATA

DECISION

CONTRACT

RESULT

Satellites, sensors, laboratories, local observations

Plans, thresholds, scenarios, budgetary authority

Tasks, performers, payments, restrictions

Reports, verification, archive, re-application

different

IDs

money before

evidence

Knowledge is not

Returns

We need not a single owner of everything, but a single evidence cycle.

Identifiers, versions, credentials, and verification must link the four separate circuits.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Five circuits complete one controlled cycle

ARCHITECTURE

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

HERITAGE ARCHIVE

Observation, recognition, prediction and control.

Initiatives, participants, knowledge, feedback, scaling.

Passport of task, cooperation, capital, contract, data and result.

Cooperative execution, pilots and replication.

Origin, Versions, Evidence, Errors, and Scientific Reuse.

Verified result and errors are returned to EQUILIBRIUM via Heritage Archive

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Biosphere — the object of control with six bound layers

DYNAMIC MODEL

AIR

composition, transfer, extremes

BIOCENOSIS

WATER

quality, stock, availability

Changing one layer changes the risks and allowable actions in the rest.

SOIL

Fertility, pollution, erosion

BIOTA

types, habitats, functions

For each layer are fixed:

  • initial state
  • Pressure and uncertainty
  • Measurable response to action

HUMANITY

health, practices, vulnerability

TECHNOGENIC LOAD

sources, infrastructure, waste

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

ECO-PPA turns the task into a workable contract

PROJECT PASSPORT

TASK + TECHNOLOGY + COOPERATION + CAPITAL

+ CONTACT + DATA + RESULT

01 PASSPORT

02 GATE

03 RESULT

Base line, object, owner, method, rights and restrictions.

Authorized event, required data, verification and decision authority.

Verified change, financial footprint and archival record.

ECO-PPA forms the project frame; execution remains in a separate circuit.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Four registers are linked but not mixed

ACCOUNTING ARCHITECTURE

RegisterWhat recordsWho confirmsThe Key Connector
MoneyLegal obligations and paymentsBank / Treasury / Financial Operatorcontract_id
BiosphereBaseline, pressure, measurable resultProfile Data Ownersobject_id + method_id
EvidenceSource, version, verification, originIndependent validator + archiveevidence_id
SolutionsMandate, threshold, authorization, deletionAuthorized bodydecision_id

Environmental impact does not translate into monetary value

without legal methodology, independent evaluation and contractual basis

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Money moves by law; gates run the contract

FINANCIAL CONTOUR

LEGAL SOURCE

CONTRACT / ACCOUNT

GATE OF IMPLEMENTATION

PAYMENT / CORRECTION

Budget, fund, loan or investment capital.

Assignment, limit, rights, prohibitions and responsible.

Event + data + verification + authorized solution.

The action is performed only by an already authorized operator.

The model does not issue money and does not execute payment automatically

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The model advises; the authority remains with the person

CONTOUR OF SOLUTIONS

DATA

Observations, quality, versions, access rights

MODEL

Scenarios, probability, range of uncertainty

RESPONSIBLE SOLUTION

Basis, Mandate, Threshold, Exclusion, Signature

PROOF AND ARCHIVE

Record of decision, origin of data, possibility of revision

No automatic money transfers on the model signal

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Heritage Archive Turns Result into Memory

MEMORY AND ORIGIN

Seven related collections

Object passport

Academic cycle

Research request

  • Documentary
  • Scientific
  • Technology
  • Natural
  • Cultural
  • digital
  • Project evidence
  • ID and Context
  • Origin and Authenticity
  • Rights and Ethics of Access
  • digital representations
  • checksum and version
  • Relations with projects and publications

Data and Method

Conclusion and publication

enrichment and re-verification

Archive oriented to principles OAIS / PREMIS / W3C PROV

The metadata profile and implementation are separately verified; OAIS is not a complete IT system.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Validation is separated from execution and payment

SECTION OF ROLES

RoleResponsible forNot entitled
Decision ownerMandate, thresholds, GO/NO-GORewriting the original evidence
Data OwnerSource, quality, version, rightsAllow payment
SPECZASHCHITA / performerWorks, magazines, performance safetyValidate own result
Independent ValidatorMethod, sampling, verification of evidenceDo a job or move money
Financial operatorLegitimate payment by authorized statusReinterpret the evidence
Archive KeeperVersions, origin, access, preservationTo assign a scientific conclusion or to make a decision

One participant should not simultaneously create, confirm and pay for the result

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

90 days must prove manageability, not scale

PLAN OF VERIFICATION

0–30

31–60

61–90

DESIGN

COLLECTION

PROVE

Boundaries, roles, data map, risks, legal routes and stop criteria.

Data connections, one base line, one ECO-PPA and archive object passport.

Dry gate run, independent inspection, security and solution package.

Output: GO / conditional GO / NO-GO - without automatic transition

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Pilot "Syzran - Rameno - Smolkino" - only after GO

CONDITIONAL NEXT STAGE

Baseline and Tools

Confirmation of objects, methods, sources and access mode.

MONTH 1–3

TERRITORY

SYZRAN

Contracts and First Impacts

Limited works, magazines, gates and archival records.

MONTH 4–6

RAMENO

Comparison and correction

Comparison of territories, model errors and actual response.

MONTH 7–9

SMOLKINO

Independent evaluation

A decision to complete, continue, or scale.

MONTH 10–12

Candidate packages: water • soil • biocenosis • heritage

The composition is confirmed by the results of 90-day inspection.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Solution — verification with strict stop conditions

GO / NO-GO

CONDITIONAL GO

NO-GO

The data is traceable.

Legal route confirmed.

Roles are divided.

Dry driving is going on.

Gaps are limited.

Everyone has a date and a date.

The pilot is confined to a safe volume.

No proven origin, authority, security or control of payment.

Approve 90-day check. Do not approve 12-month deployment in advance.

No new currency • No replacement for institutions and national accounts • No world standard

Without guarantee of profitability or environmental effect • Not a certificate of legal compliance

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Sources cited in presentation 19

  • WMO, State of the Global Climate 2025 — https://wmo.int/publication-series/state-of-global-climate/state-of-global-climate-2025
  • Project-bound AI-generated hero image supplied for this deck; no external URL.
  • WMO, Early Warnings for All — https://wmo.int/activities/early-warnings-all/wmo-and-early-warnings-all-initiative
  • ISO/IEC 17029:2019, principles for validation and verification — https://www.iso.org/standard/29352.html
  • BIS, Annual Economic Report 2026, chapter on trust and tokenisation — https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2026e3.htm
  • UN SEEA Ecosystem Accounting — https://seea.un.org/en/methodology/ecosystem-accounting
  • TNFD Recommendations — https://tnfd.global/recommendations/
  • GEO, Global Earth Observation System of Systems — https://www.earthobservations.org/geoss.php
  • GEO, GEOSS as a coordinated system of systems — https://www.earthobservations.org/geoss.php
  • W3C PROV-O — https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
  • WHO, One Health — https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/one-health
  • GEO, Ecosystems, biodiversity and carbon management — https://earthobservations.org/our-work/solutions/ecosystems-biodiversity-and-carbon-management
  • CBD, Kunming–Montreal GBF Target 19 — https://www.cbd.int/gbf/targets/19
  • BIS, Annual Economic Report 2026 — https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2026e3.htm
  • Library of Congress, PREMIS — https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/
  • NGFS, 2026 Nature Package — https://www.ngfs.net/en/publications-and-statistics/publications/ngfs-2026-nature-package
  • GEO, GEOSS — https://www.earthobservations.org/geoss.php
  • ISO 14721:2025, OAIS reference model — https://www.iso.org/standard/87471.html
  • ISO/IEC 17029:2019 — https://www.iso.org/standard/29352.html

Published files

Ecology · Full published text

Planetary Balance and the Balance of the Biosphere

Source Status: Primary Document

Document on the harmonization of natural, social and technological processes in the biosphere.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/planetarnyi-balans-i-balans-biosfery

Open on the site

The concept of the architecture of accounting, monitoring, forecasting and management of the state of the Earth

1. Strategic idea

Planetary Balance is an integral system of accounting and management of the state of the Earth as a single socio-natural and technological organism. The balance of the biosphere is its natural core and answers the main question: does the biosphere retain the ability to self-replicate under the existing load of mankind?

In contrast to the traditional balance sheet, the new model takes into account not only monetary and property indicators, but also natural flows, the state of ecosystems, the quality of the environment, recovery, human and intellectual capital. Each indicator should have a data source, unit of measurement, territorial reference, history of changes and verification criteria.

2. Planetary Balance Tasks

  • Inventory of the natural, human, infrastructure and intellectual assets of the planet.
  • Separation of stocks, flows, loads, risks and recovery processes.
  • Transition from annual retrospective reporting to dynamic Living Balance.
  • The relationship of global goals to a specific territory, project, object, and measurement.
  • Preliminary assessment of the consequences of decisions before their implementation.
  • Formation of a single evidence-based contour for government, science, business and society.

3. Planetary Balance Structure

ContourContents
Natural capitalatmosphere, water, soils, forests, biodiversity, oceans, subsoil, ecosystem functions
Human capitalpopulation, health, education, competence, quality of life
Intellectual Capitalscience, RID/OIC, data, technological competence, knowledge archive
Cultural Capitallanguages, traditions, heritage, spiritual culture, monuments, cultural continuity
Infrastructure capitalenergy, transport, cities, communications, production, engineering systems
Burdens and obligationspollution, resource depletion, soil degradation, waste, technogenic risks
Recovery capitalReclamation, reforestation, water treatment, species and ecosystem restoration

4. Balance of Biosphere

The balance of the biosphere is formed by nine interrelated contours:

ContourWhat we measure
01 AtmosphereO₂, CO₂, CH₄, aerosols, temperature, humidity, air quality
02 Hydrosphereoceans, rivers, lakes, groundwater, glaciers, water quality and availability
03 Soilfertility, organic matter, erosion, pollution, desertification
04 Vegetationforest cover, productivity, recovery, degradation
05 Animal Worldnumbers, ranges, migrations, endangered species
06 Microbiomesoil and aquatic microbial communities, ecosystem sustainability
07 Personhealth, environmental quality, nutrition, water, pollution effects
08 Technosphereindustry, energy, transport, cities, mining, waste
09 Recoveryreforestation, reclamation, cleaning, species return, load reduction

5. Three types of flows

I. Real flows — water, energy, raw materials, products, money, waste — are what are actually moving or being transformed.

II. Nominal flows - rights, obligations, contracts, licenses, taxes, cost - legal and accounting representation of the relationship.

III. Live streams - forest reproduction, increasing fertility, increasing biodiversity, improving health, knowledge accumulation and heritage transfer.

Key formula of the model:

Condition = Stock + Reproduction − Consumption − Degradation + Restoration

6. Unit of account: Live account of a natural object

Each natural object receives a digital passport and a unique identifier, for example: BIO:RU-VOLGA-WATER-001.

  • Geography and boundaries of the object
  • responsible subject and management rights
  • natural parameters and condition
  • sensors, satellite data and laboratory measurements
  • History of impacts and recovery
  • financing and projects
  • Related Risks and Forecast
  • Evidence and verification status

7. The Principle of Connectivity

Ascending contour: sensor → Biocenosis → Territory → Region → State → Continent → Biosphere → Planetary Balance.

Downward Path: Planetary Target → Continent → Country → Region → Territory → Project → Action → Measurable result.

This structure transforms the balance from reporting into a management system: each decision has a cause, an executor, a resource, a result indicator and a trace in the balance sheet.

8. The Biosphere Balance Index

An integral index can be used for navigation IBE (Index of Biosphere EQUILIBRIUM). It does not replace primary indicators, but serves as an upper-level indication of the state of.

IBE = f(A, W, S, B, H, T, R)

  • A - Atmosphere
  • W - water
  • S - Soil
  • B - Biodiversity
  • H - person
  • T - man-made load
  • R - Recovery

Calculation methods, weights and thresholds must be scientifically validated and cannot be set arbitrarily.

9. State of the Territories

StatusMeaning
I - Balancesystem is reproduced, loads do not exceed the recovery potential
II - TensionCertain loads are approaching critical thresholds
III — DegradationReproduction is disrupted, recovery program needed
IV - Critical conditionImmediate management intervention is required
R - Recoverya confirmed program of return to a sustainable state

10. Management architecture in the EG

1. The EG Code

2. The Civilizational Operating System

3. Planetary Balance

4. Balance of Biosphere

5. Balances of continents

6. Balances of States

7. Balances of regions

8. Biocenose Balances

9. Biocenosis monitoring point

10. Sensor / Surveillance / Person

Transverse systems: Metarester, ESR, SPECZASHCHITA, AI, Living Balance, Heritage Preservation Archive.

11. Living Balance as a Management Cycle

  1. 1. Monitoring
  2. 2. Verification
  3. 3. Status assessment
  4. 4. Scenario Forecasting
  5. 5. Decision
  6. 6. Financing
  7. 7. Implementation
  8. 8. Re-measurement
  9. 9. Adjustment of balance

12. Pilot implementation

  • Choose 3 territories of different types: urban agglomeration contour, river basin, natural and agricultural territory.
  • Determine 40–60 mandatory primary indicators of the Biosphere Balance.
  • Create digital passports of natural objects and link them to data sources.
  • Launch daily/weekly monitoring and monthly Live Balance.
  • To introduce a project register of restoration measures with impact assessment.
  • In 6 months to independently validate the methodology and prepare a scaling standard.

13. Final formula

Planetary Balance is the accounting of civilization’s responsibility to the Earth.
The balance of the biosphere is the accounting of life itself.

Other published edition: Planetary Balance and Biosphere Balance Planetary_Balance_and_Balance_Biospheres_EG.pptx · web text +

The Natural Core of the Living Balance of One State

PLANETARY BALANCE

BALANCE BIOSPHERES

1. What is Planetary Balance

• The system of accounting of the state of the Earth as a single socio-natural-technological organism.

• Not only cost: natural indicators, condition, dynamics, risks and recovery.

• Connects global goals to a specific territory, object, project, and outcome.

2. Two levels of a single system

• Planetary Balance is the entire contour of civilization and the planet.

• The balance of the biosphere is the natural core: the ability of the living shell of the Earth to reproduce itself.

• Live Balance is a dynamic update and decision-making mode.

3. The Seven Capitals of the Planetary Balance

• Natural

• Human

• Intelligent

• Cultural and Spiritual

• Infrastructure

• Loads and obligations

• Recovery capital

4. Nine contours of the Biosphere Balance

• Atmosphere

• Hydrosphere

• Soil

• Vegetation

• Animal World

• Microbiome

• Person

• Technosphere

• Recovery

5. Three types of flows

• Real - water, energy, raw materials, products, money, waste.

• Nominal - rights, obligations, contracts, licenses, taxes, cost.

• Living - ecosystem reproduction, health, knowledge, cultural continuity.

6. The basic formula of living balance

• Status = Stock + Reproduction − Consumption − Degradation + Recovery.

• The formula applies to forest, water, soil, biocenose and territory.

• Every parameter must be measurable, verifiable, and have a data source.

7. Live account of the natural object

• Unique ID: BIO:RU-VOLGA-WATER-001.

• Geography, control rights, status parameters, sensors, satellite and laboratory data.

• Impact history, recovery projects, financing, effect, forecast, verification.

8. The Principle of Connectivity

• Up: Sensor → Biocenosis → Territory → Region → Country → Continent → Biosphere.

• Down: Planetary target → project → action → measurable result.

• Balance becomes not a report, but a control circuit.

9. Biosphere Balance Index IBE

• IBE = f(atmosphere, water, soils, biodiversity, man, man-made load, restoration).

• The index is a navigation indicator, not a replacement for primary data.

• Weighting factors and thresholds must pass scientific validation.

10. Five statuses of the territory

• I — Balance

• II - Voltage

• III — Degradation

• IV — Critical condition

• R — Recovery

11. EG Architecture

• The EG Code → TsOS → Planetary Balance → Balance of Biosphere.

• Next: Continents → States → regions → Biocenoses → Monitoring Points.

• Transverse Systems: Metarester, EDPR, SPECZASHCHITA, AI, Heritage Archive.

12. Management cycle

• Observation

• Verification

• Status assessment

• Scenario prediction

• Solution

• Financing

• Execution

• Re-measurement

• Balance adjustment

13. Pilot for 6 months

• 3 territories of different types: city, river basin, natural and agricultural zone.

• 40–60 mandatory primary indicators.

• Digital passports of objects + monitoring + Monthly Live Balance.

• Independent validation and scaling standard.

14. Result

• Planetary Balance is the accounting of civilization's responsibility to the Earth.

• The balance of the biosphere is the accounting of life itself.

• The goal is to manage not only the resources, but also the ability of systems to reproduce life.

Published files

Food · Full published text

Food Security and an Integrated Farm Covering the Full Production Cycle

Source Status: Primary Document

A concept for a biotic community and an integrated farm covering the full production cycle as a foundation for a sustainable food supply.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/prodovolstvennaya-bezopasnost-i-ferma-polnogo-tsikla

Open on the site

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich
Moscow · Version 1.0 · 29 August 2026

02 STATUS AND SCOPE

Passport document

FieldContents
NameFood Security: Biocenosis and the Full Cycle Farm
Author of the conceptSokolov Sergey Leonidovich
StatusStrategic concept and terms of reference for a pre-project pilot; not project documentation and not sanitary-epidemiological conclusion
PurposeAgree on framework, module composition, performance criteria, control contour and 90-day verification program
TerritoryDetermined by the decision of the customer; all numerical parameters of the site require field survey and legal verification
Version1.0 from 29.08.2026
Storage circuitEQUILIBRIUM - data and forecast; Heritage Archive - Versions, Evidence, Decisions and Results

Change control: each new version receives a number, a list of modified assumptions, the author of the agreement, the date and links to the primary data. The strategic decision is made by the person; analytics and AI only identify deviations, model scenarios and prepare options.

03 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Action to be taken

90 days pre-project pilot4 Security Measurements19 modules in full catalog1 independent solution GO / STOP

Request

Allow a limited 90-day pilot for the selected territory. Its result is not the “promise of the farm”, but a testable pre-project model: the boundaries of the biocenosis, material balances, sanitary barriers, a digital passport, financial scenarios and a package of decisions on subsequent implementation.

PILOT MUST PROVE • What food needs are closing the area; • Which modules are really needed and which are excluded; • How food, feed, dung, water and dangerous flows are separated; • how to measure the contribution to accessibility, access, use and stability; • Is there a legal mandate, market, operator and financing.PILOT MUST NOT PROMISE • absolute autonomy or “zero waste”; • profitability without CAPEX, OPEX, Prices and confirmed off-take; • Return of any residue to the food cycle; • certification to laboratory and supervisory procedures; • scaling to independent verification.

04 SINGLE MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK

What is food security

FAO/CFS defines food security as the permanent physical, social and economic access of all people to sufficient, safe and nutritious food for an active and healthy life. For farm design, this means four simultaneously verifiable measurements - none can be replaced by gross output.

MeasurementQuestion for the TerritoryProject indicators
AvailabilityDo you have the right size and range?commodity output; yield variability; reserve; losses; seasonality
AccessCan the target group get the product?price and share of costs; delivery radius; contracts; coverage of vulnerable groups
UseIs food safe and nutritious?HACCP; laboratory abnormalities; dietary diversity; water and sanitation
StabilityDoes the function remain in shock?days of autonomy; recovery time; dependence on seeds, feed, energy and logistics

Source: CFS Global Strategic Framework and HLPE-FSN

05 DOCTRINE 2020 / CHANGES 2025

Russian Framework: Independence, Accessibility, Sustainability

The doctrine of food security of the Russian Federation sets national thresholds for self-sufficiency. It is a country, not a separate farm. The pilot uses them as a benchmark for product composition and technological independence, without giving out local indicators for the implementation of the national standard.

GroupThreshold of doctrineRole in the pilot
Grainnot less than 95%food, feed, seed and reserve circuit
Sugar/vegetable oilnot less than 90% / 90%selection of crops and depth of processing by climate and market
Meat / Milknot less than 85% / 90%livestock module - only with feed base and biodefense
Fishnot less than 85%Aquaculture - optionally after water and veterinary risks assessment
Potatoes / Vegetablesnot less than 95% / 90%seasonality, storage, greenhouse module, losses
Fruits and berriesnot less than 60%multi-year plantings and local adaptation
Seeds of domestic selectionnot less than 75%Traceability of Origin and Plan for Technological Independence
Salt foodnot less than 85%external input; do not simulate local circuit

The changes of 2025 added to the Doctrine the contours of global food security. The project can be scalable and exportable, but the first condition remains a proven function for the target territory and compliance with Russian requirements.

the Ministry of Agriculture 2025 year: grain — 161%, fish — 128,8%, Meat — 102%, Potatoes — 97,9%; Below the threshold of the Doctrine, vegetables were evaluated — 89,6%, Milk — 85,3%, fruits and berries — 44%. This is an assessment of the 13.02.2026, not the final balance of Rosstat.

Source: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 20 from 21.01.2020 and Decree No. 141 from 10.03.2025

Source: Ministry of Agriculture of Russia — self-sufficiency assessment for the year 2025

06 SYSTEM PROBLEM

Why the gross output is not enough

645 million famine in 20252,1 billion Moderate/Severe Insecurity2,69 billion Can't afford a healthy diet

SOFI 2026 shows that the growth of production by itself does not guarantee food and availability. Post-farm operations - processing, logistics, cold chain and wholesale - form a large part of the final price. Consequently, storage, processing, transport and contract availability should be designed in conjunction with field and livestock production.

If you only measure...Hidden RiskWhat adds a full cycle model
tons of productsloss, range deficit, seasonal gapbalance of output, losses, stocks and available rations
Yielddepletion of soil and water, high variabilitysoil, water and biodiversity contour
ProceedsUnaffordable price and dependence on one buyeroff-take, social order, portfolio of markets
“Percentage of processing”Sanitaryly dangerous return of the balanceclassification of flows and barriers to admission
Digitalizationdata without action and responsibilityroles, thresholds, decision log and independent verification

Source: SOFI 2026 — official report FAO/IFAD/UNICEF/WFP/WHO

07 BORDERS OF CONCEPT

Full cycle farm: working definition

IT MEANS • one material and economic balance; • single party passport from source to recall; • Separation of clean and polluted flows; • modularity: composition depends on the territory; • design of power supply and market together with production; • Measurable recovery of natural capital.IT DOES NOT MEAN • compulsory presence of all types of animals and cultures; • return of any waste to the field or feed; • Rejection of external inputs and markets; • Technological Optimism Instead of Resolutions; • Replacement of veterinary, phytosanitary and food control; • guarantee of profitability before calculating the scenarios.

The catalog contains 19 modules, but the pilot includes only those for which the resource base, sanitary compatibility, operator and sales are proven. The rest remain options with activation conditions.

08 FOUR SLEEPS

Biocenosis - territory as a single living system

LayerWhat is includedMain management issue
Naturalsoil, water, relief, climate, plants, animals, microbiotaWhat kind of load is acceptable without degradation?
Productioncrops, herds, feed, machinery, processing, energyWhat flows create the product and what are the risks?
Infrastructureroads, water, networks, warehouses, cold, laboratories, communicationWhere are the bottlenecks and reservations?
Socialpopulation, personnel, food, owners, buyers, authoritiesWho benefits, takes risks and makes decisions?

The biocenosis point is the “digital sense organ” of the territory. It does not control the farm automatically: it registers the state and origin of the data, identifies the deviation, transfers it to EQUILIBRIUM and forms the testable basis for a human solution.

The meaning of the chain is not an administrative complication, but a department of supervision, financing, execution and independent confirmation. This reduces the risk of “self-esteem” by the operator of its own results.

09 FLOW ARCHITECTURE

End-to-end cycle: product moves forward, resources return

StreamRule
FoodUnidirectional: raw materials → control → Reprocessing → cold/storage → Market → Review
WaterSource → Preparation → Use → Separate Collection → Cleaning → Reusable
Organicaclassification → quarantine → analysis → compost/digestat/recycling on the permitted route
EnergyEfficiency → own generation → accumulation/reserve → external import accounting

10 CONSTRUCTOR, NOT A MANDATORY SET

Catalog of 19 modules

№ModuleFunctionInclusion condition
01Basic diagnosticsboundaries, soil, water, climate, biodiversitysurvey law and representative network of points
02Seeds and kennelgenetic material, seedlings, reserveTraceability and zoning
03Field Culturesfood, feed, crop rotationSuitable soils and water budget
04Protected groundSeasonal levelingenergy, water, market
05Kormabalance of rations and reserveLink to actual livestock
06Livestock/birdsProtein and by-productsveterinary zone and feed base
07Aquacultureadditional proteinWater quality and epizootic assessment
08Vet-/Phytosanitaryprevention, quarantine, controlmandatory module
09Primary processingwashing, sorting, coolingHACCP/GHP and clean zones
10Deep processingrange and shelf lifemarket, recipe, equipment, permits
№ModuleFunctionInclusion condition
11Warehouse and coldSeasonal and quality buffercold chain and energy reserve
12Packing/markingSecurity and IdentificationEAEU TR and Party Data
13Water and EnergyReliability and reuseBalances and permits
14Organic residuescompost, biogas, safe disposalPollution analysis and tolerance
15Laboratory/monitoringenvironment, raw material and product controlaccredited methods/external laboratory
16Logistics and marketaccess, off-take, return/reviewcontracts and demand map
17Training and R&Dpersonnel, tests, protocolsresponsible partners
18Management and financemandate, budget, insurance, KPIoperator and observation circuit
19Heritage archiveversions, decisions, evidence, licensesmandatory module

11 NO DOUBLE ACCOUNT

Rules of material balance

For each crop, herd and processing, a balance of mass, water, nitrogen, phosphorus, energy and cost is built. The unit of time and the boundaries of the system are fixed in advance. Each exit has one status: commodity, internal resource, stock, loss, return, risk balance or disposal.

RuleVerificationStop signal
Conservation of massInput = Item + Internal Use + Stock + Loss + BalanceUnexplained gap greater than measurement tolerance
One economic effectby-product - either revenue or prevented consumptionSimultaneous accounting in two effects
Quality is more important than volumeaccounting for dry matter, class, food suitabilitytons without quality and purpose
Water by Purposesource, quality, application area, returnMixture of rain, technological and manure water
NutrientsN/P/K: source, assimilation, stock, release, take-off riskpositive "effect" on accumulation of pollution
Limit of calculationwhat's inside the farm that relates to the supplier/marketTransfer of impact abroad without disclosure

12 NATURAL CAPITAL

Soil and biodiversity — a productive asset

Soil is not considered as a background, but as an asset with measurable carrying capacity. The baseline is fixed to the project promises. The change is estimated by comparable plots, seasons and methods; a single measurement does not prove the trend.

ContourBasic diagnosticsControl actionKPI-trend
Fertilityorganic carbon/substance, pH, structure, N/P/Kcrop rotation, cover crops, accurate nutritionstability/growth without excessive balance
Erosionslope, cover, flush, sealcontouring, lanes, restriction of travelDecrease in exposed soil and flushing
Biotaearthworms, microbiota, pollinators, birdsrefugiums, forest strips, reduction of toxic loadIncreased Functional Diversity
Pollutionheavy metals, pesticides, pathogens at riskzoning, ban/remediation, entrance controlno excess and transfer to food

Practitioners are selected by outcome rather than by labeling them “organic” or “regenerative”. FAO considers diversity, synergies, efficiency, sustainability and resource processing as interrelated elements of agroecological transition.

Source: FAO: 10 Elements of Agroecology

13 WATER SECURITY

Water circuit: source, quality, re-use

Water areaMinimum controlPermissible action
Drinking/foodmicrobiology, chemistry, source, reserveOnly prepared water and confirmed scheme
Irrigationsalts, pathogens, priority pollutants, culturerisk-oriented choice of method and timing of watering
Technologicalprocess point and product contactcontour separation, CIP, quality log
Rainfallarea of collection, first washing, storagenon-food needs or training for the intended purpose
Stocksseparate collection: household, technological, manurecleaning, laboratory tolerance, controlled discharge/repetition
m³/t Water capacity of the productdays water reserve% re-use by tolerance0 Unauthorized discharges

14 SEED AND SELF-WORTH

Plant production: nutrition, feed and sustainability

The structure of crops is derived from the diet of the target territory, agroclimatic conditions, soils, water, feed needs and contracts. Monoculture can produce short-term volume, but reduce stability and increase dependence on external means of production.

FunctionDecisionEvidence
Foodbasic cultures + vegetables/bean + Optionally fruitsa plan of food yield and nutritive contribution
Feedherbs, grains, legumes, by-products by admissiondiets, stocks, quality and mycotoxins
Soilcrop rotation, cover, perennial elementsCarbon and Nutrient Balance
Genetic sustainabilitydistricted varieties, diversification, seed reserveorigin, germination, phytosanitary status
Plant protectionintegrated protection and intervention thresholdsJournal of observations, application, residues and effect
Seasonalitystorage, protected soil, contractual cooperationMonthly balance of availability and demand

15 BIOSASITA

Animals, Plants, Humans and Environment: One Health

One Health is an integrated approach that connects the health of people, domestic and wild animals, plants and ecosystems. For a full cycle, this means a separate biosafety plan, quarantine, veterinary control, antimicrobial management, and flow barriers.

BarrierWhat is being checkedDecision in violation
Animal/Bird/Fish Entrysource, status, transport, quarantineisolation, diagnostics, prohibition of input
Food and waterpathogens, mycotoxins, chemical risks, traceabilityBlocking the party, alternative reserve
Zoningclean/dirty routes, visitors, machinery, wildlifesanitary ware, disinfection, flow adjustment
Health and Well-beinginspections, mortality, productivity, conditions of detentionveterinary decision and action log
Manure and fallseparate collection, storage, pathogens, routeDisposal/disposal; prohibition of unauthorized return
Antimicrobialsreadings, assignment, waiting periods, balancesExclusion of the party and investigation of the cause

Source: WHO: One Health; Joint Plan FAO–UNEP–WHO–WOAH extended to 2029 years

16 CODEX ALIMENTARIUS

Food safety: GHP + HACCP throughout the chain

Revision CXC 1-1969 (2022) shares good hygiene practices and HACCP. HACCP is used where basic practices are insufficient. The plan is built for a specific product and process, validated prior to launch, and tested in operation.

Principle HACCPThe result for a full cycle farm
1. Hazard analysisbiological, chemical and physical hazards from soil/feed to transport
2. Critical control pointsonly points where the control is critical to the acceptability of the product
3. Critical limitsvalidated temperature, time, pH or other measurable limit
4. MonitoringWho, what, how, when, and where to record
5. Corrective actionproduct retention, regain control, investigate the cause
6. Validation and verificationproof of plan and independent verification of performance
7. Entriestrackable version of the plan, events, deviations, release and review

Source: Codex Alimentarius: General Principles of Food Hygiene, CXC 1-1969

17 ACCESS AND STABILITY

Storage, cold and distribution - part of the farm

The monthly balance of supply and demand shows which product is needed fresh, which is chilled, frozen, dried, canned or through contractual cooperation. Warehouses and cold chain are designed by products, not one total capacity.

ContourKPIReservations
Dry products warehouseturnover; loss; pests; humidityalternative warehouse and emergency plan
Cold/freezingtemperature deviations; kW·h/t; recovery timegenerator/drive; emergency transfer
Transporttime; temperature log; traceabilitySecond carrier and route
Distributionshare of contract off-take; radius; regularityportfolio of buyers and social contour
Reviewtime of localization and notification; completeness of the batchTraining and Pre-Designated Director

18 RESIDENCES AND ENERGY

Circularity: Return resource, not risk

StreamPreferred routeObligatory barrier
Plant residuesfeed / compost / biogas / mulchpesticides, pathogens, weeds, suitability
Manure/filthcontrolled storage → processing → depositpathogens, nitrogen/phosphorus, timing, field capacity
Food by-productsFood Ingredient / Food / Energycategory, allergen, temperature, legislative tolerance
Precipitation CleaningDisposal / Authorized Use / Recyclingheavy metals, organics, pathogens
Heat and Biogasown needs, reserve, authorized leavegas quality, safety, emissions accounting
Packaging and hazardous wasteSeparate collection and licensed operatorProhibition of mixing with organic contour

Losses and waste are accounted for separately. Globally 13,3% food is lost between collection and retail, and 1,05 billion tons were thrown out at the level of trade, catering and households in 2022 year. For the pilot, this is an argument in favor of measuring the actual yield and shelf life, not the slogan "zero waste".

Source: UN SDG 12.3.1 and UNEP Food Waste Index 2024

19 OBSERVATION AND REACTION

Biocenosis point: four modes and three levels

ModeTriggerAction
Backgroundindicators in the allowable corridorplanned monitoring, prevention, update the forecast
Increased attentiontrend to the threshold or data failureincreased measurement, source verification, local adjustment
Emergencyexceeding the critical threshold/threat to the product, people or environmentStopping site, batch retention, notification and emergency protocol
Recoverydanger localized, but function not confirmedStep-by-step return, enhanced control, independent verification
Station levelCompositionPurpose
Basicminimum meteorological, soil, water and production sensorsoperational management of the site
Advancedadditional samples, laboratory points, biota, energy and logisticsEvaluation of causes and inter-module relationships
Referentialhigh-precision methods, calibration, data quality controlNetwork comparability and independent verification

20 EQUILIBRIUM

Digital architecture: from sensor to proof

LayerContentsQuality control
Sourcesensor, laboratory, operator, document, satelliteidentity, calibration, authority
Registerterritory, asset, party, trial, event, permitunique ID, version, links
Modelmaterial balances, forecast, scenario, digital twinassumptions, range, accuracy, date
Decisionthreshold, alarm, option, responsible, deadlineJournal "who/why/what changed"
Implementationoutfit, contractor, fact, photo/protocol, costcomparison with decision and contract
Verificationre-measurement, independent conclusion, statusbaseline data and reproducibility
Archiveversions, rights, licenses, historical seriesUnchangeable link and retention period

EQUILIBRIUM combines observation, prediction and control of deviations. It does not replace the laboratory, supervision or operator. Separately, the measurement, model interpretation and management decision are kept in order not to give the forecast as a fact.

21 LIABILITY DIVISION

Roles of the ecosystem

ParticipantRoleDoes not substitute
Security CouncilStrategic coordination of risks and interagency contoursOperator and Supervisory Authorities
RF CCIbusiness circuit, cooperation, suppliers, buyers, replicationInvestment Committee and Technical Control
ASIinitiatives, barriers, scaling practicesthe Rightholder and the Customer
ECO‑PPAresource mobilization, contractual relationship of investors, operator, buyers and validatorslicenses, permits and guarantees of profitability
EQUILIBRIUMobservation, prediction, thresholds, scenarios and decision loghuman strategic decision
SPECZASHCHITAperformance of engineering and restoration work on outfitsindependent verification
Heritage archiveversions, evidence, origin, rights and resultsOperational Management System
Farm operatordaily production, safety, personnel, budget and reportingthe Customer and Supervisory Authorities

22 COMPLIANCE-BY-DESIGN

Conformity map: from mandatory to voluntary

LevelWhat is being checkedStatus for the project
The Russian strategyThe doctrine of food security; agricultural development; technological independenceTarget orientation and national indicators
Russian Federation / EAEU LawTR CU 021/2011 and 022/2011; food technical regulations; veterinary medicine, phytosanitary, water, waste, land, construction, laborMandatory requirements for selected processes
Codex AlimentariusGHP/HACCP, hygienic codes and risk-oriented controlinternational methodological base; applied taking into account the right of the EAEU / RF
One Health / WOAH / IPPCHuman, animal, plant and environmental health; biosecurityMethodological framework and industry standards
FAO/CFS/SDGfour dimensions of safety, sustainable agriculture, nutrition, lossthe Contribution and Comparability Assessment System
Buyer's contracts and standardsspecifications, audit, cold chain, quality, traceabilityoff-take condition; does not replace the mandatory right

TR CU 021/2011 requires the manufacturer to develop, implement and maintain procedures based on the principles of HACCP. This is not tantamount to a universal requirement to acquire a voluntary “certificate HACCP”: the form of conformity assessment and evidence determine the applicable technical regulations and product matrix.

The register of requirements is formed after the fixation of products, processes, site and market. For each item: source, applicability, owner, proof, term, status and associated risk. “Conformity as a whole” is not accepted without an article-by-article matrix.

23 BASIC LINE → PURPOSE → FACT

Panel KPI: result, safety, stability

BlockExamples KPIUnit / period
Productscommodity output; assortment; deviation from the plan; lossest/month; SKU; %
Accessbasket price; proportion of contract volume; radius; coveragerub.; %; km; person
Food/qualitynutritive contribution; inconsistencies; complaints/reviewsservings; %; cases
Stabilitystock; water/energy autonomy; recovery timedays; hours
Soil/biotacarbon; erosion; cover; indicator groupstrend by season/year
Waterwater capacity; quality; re-use by tolerancem³/t; % of samples; % of samples
NutrientsN/P balance; percentage of safely returned flowskg/ha; %
Energy/climatekW·h/t; share of own energy; emissions at borderkW·h/t; %; tCO₂e
Biosecurityincidents; time of detection; correctioncases; hours; %
Traceabilitycompleteness of passports; time of party localization%; minutes/hours
Economycost; marginal income; cash gap; DSCRrub./unit; rub.; days; coefficient
Social contouremployment; labor safety; training; local procurementFTE; cases; hours; %

24 FINANCIAL MODEL

The economy: consider the portfolio, not a beautiful installation

ElementContentsRule
Revenuefresh and processed products; seeds/seedlings; feed; servicesonly confirmed market and script price
SavingsSubstituted energy, fertilizers, water, recyclingNot to count as revenue at the same time.
CAPEXearth/preparation, buildings, lines, cold, water, energy, laboratory, ITtotal cost of ownership + reserve
OPEXseeds, feed, personnel, energy, veterinary, packaging, logistics, analysesby loading and seasonality modes
Working capitalstocks, unfinished production, debtorMonthly cash flow
Riskprices, harvest, disease, power supply, buyer, permitsStress scenarios and insurance

Basic formulas: unit cost = Distributed OPEX / commodity output; marginal income = Revenue - variable costs; EBITDA-proxy = operating revenue - operating expenses before financing, taxes and depreciation. NPV, IRR and DSCR are only calculated after receiving the confirmed input.

BASE planned demand and harvestSTRESS price/harvest/energy/logisticsUPSIDE cooperation and capacity utilization

25 WORK PLAN

90-day pilot: prove the model before construction

PeriodWorkVerified result
Days 1–15mandate, borders, access rights; demand map; stakeholder register; work safety planterritory passport and protocol of approvals
Days 16–30soil, water, infrastructure; flows; sanitary zoning; list of products and processesbase line and restriction map
Days 31–55Module options; food/feed/water/energy balances; digital registryA/B/C options and a concept-level digital twin
Days 56–75CAPEX/OPEX; market and off-take; permit track; stress tests; biosecurity plan/HACCPpre-investment model and risk register
Days 76–90demonstration of key cycles; recall exercises; independent verification; committee decisionGO / GO WITH CONDITIONS / STOP

The physical demonstrator may include a limited monitoring circuit, sampling, traceability, and one secure resource return loop. A full farm is not built in 90 days.

26 STAGE FINANCING

Implementation after pilot: 12–36 months

StageLandmarkContentsGate
0. Design0–6 monthsresearch, feasibility study/project, permits, contracting, working data modelreadiness for construction
1. Core6–15 monthsland/water, basic crop production, storage, monitoring, sanitary routesStable Safe Release
2. Recycling12–24 monthsprimary / deep processing, cold, packaging, logisticsconfirmed loading and quality
3. Circularity15–30 monthsorganic processing, energy, water reuse by toleranceProven effect without increased risk
4. Zoom24–36 monthscooperation, replication, training, reference stationIndependent audit of the result

Funding is opened in tranches at the confirmed gate. If the market, security or resource balance is not confirmed, the next module will not start regardless of the costs already incurred.

EARLY ASSETS • Surveys and Digital Passport; • water, sanitation routes and monitoring; • Warehouse/cold for an existing release; • contracts and staff training.LATE ACTIVITY • deep processing; • biogas and complex cleaning; • Livestock/Aquaculture; • Export Outline and Replication.

27 PROTECTION AGAINST INDEPENDENT MISTAKES

Risks and Stop Conditions

RiskEarly indicatorStop-condition / answer
No legal mandateunclear title, access, water use, easementSTOP until documented elimination
Lack of waterNegative balance in dry yearreduce module/change product/site
Biological riskno quarantine, split streams, backup planDo not introduce animals/fish
Unsafe returnno analysis and no valid routeDisposal by a licensed operator
No marketoff-take does not cover the minimum loadDo not buy a specialized line
Double-counting the economyrevenue and savings from one streamRecalculate the model and conclusion
Data is unverifiableno source, calibration, versionnot to use the indicator for the solution
Dependence on one nodesingle feed, energy, buyer, coldreserve/diversification before launch
"Green" statementsno boundary, baseline and methodologyProhibition of public approval

28 TRANSITION TO ACTION

Mandate and next 10 working days

No construction approval is required to start. It is necessary to appoint the decision maker and give a limited mandate for data collection, survey, modeling and negotiation without making investment commitments.

DayActionResponsible result
1–2appoint a customer, pilot manager, independent verifier and data operatorRACI and record of credentials
1–3offer 1–3 territories and submit titles/access rightsShort List with Red Flags
2–5identify the target group, the grocery basket and the preliminary marketdemand map and off-take hypotheses
3–7agree on survey protocol, labor protection, biosecurity and dataFieldwork plan and source register
6–10to hold a start session and approve the budget of the stage 1Zero version of passport and calendar

Candidate route "Syzran - Rameno - Smolkino" can be considered only after documentary verification of sites, powers, environmental restrictions and consent of interested parties. Until then, it is not an approved geography of the project.

29 OFFICIAL PRIMARY SOURCES

Sources and regulatory framework

[1] Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 21.01.2020 No 20 - Doctrine of food security

[2] Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 10.03.2025 No 141 — changes to the Doctrine

[3] Rosstat — agriculture and the level of self-sufficiency in products

[4] Ministry of Agriculture of Russia — a national project of technological support of food security

[5] CFS — Global Strategic Framework for Food Security and Nutrition

[6] HLPE-FSN — agency and sustainability in food security

[7] SOFI 2026 — The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World

[8] UN SDG Report 2026 — Goal 2

[9] UN Statistics — metadata of SDG 2 indicators

[10] FAOSTAT — production, balances, resources and food-security indicators

International sources verified 29.08.2026. The global figures in the document refer to the periods explicitly indicated in SOFI 2026 and the report SDG 2026. For the pilot, they are a context, not a local baseline.

30 CONTINUATION

Sources and regulatory framework

[11] Codex Alimentarius — Codes of Practice; CXC 1-1969

[12Codex Alimentarius - General Principles of Food Hygiene

[13] WHO — One Health

[14] WHO — Extension of the Joint Plan of Action to 2029

[15] FAO — 10 Elements of Agroecology

[16] World Bank — FoodSystems 2030

[17] UNEP — Food Waste Index Report 2024

Official signature

RoleName / organizationDateStatus
Author of the conceptSokolov Sergey Leonidovich29.08.2026Prepared by
Pilot's Customer________________________________________the Coordination Committee
Independent Verifier________________________________________Appointed

31 STARTING REGISTER OF APPLICATION

Key mandatory acts of the Russian Federation and the EAEU

[18] TR CU 021/2011 "On food safety" — EEC

[19] TR CU 022/2011 "Food products in terms of its labeling" — EEC

[20] EEC - official list of adopted technical regulations, including grain, milk, meat, fish and poultry

[21] Law of the Russian Federation No. 4979-1 "On Veterinary Medicine" - the official portal of legal information

[22] Decision of the Customs Union No 317 — Veterinary and Sanitary Measures of the EAEU

[23Federal Law No 206-FZ "On Plant Quarantine"

[24Federal Law No 248-FZ "On animal by-products"

[25] Veterinary rules for the management of biological waste - Order of the Ministry of Agriculture No. 677 (2024)

[26] SanPiN 2.1.3684-21 — requirements for territories, water, soil, premises and waste

Manure, litter, fall, and ordinary production waste fall under different legal regimes. Flow cannot be declared a “fertilizer” or a “resource” solely on the basis of technological intent: correct classification, notification, processing, laboratory control, and permitted route are required.

Other published edition: Food safety Prodovolstvennaya_bezopasnost_Biocenoz_i_ferma_polnogo_cikla.pptx · Web Text +

Biocenosis and a full-cycle farm

Not a farm without outside entrances,

A farm with no unaccounted losses

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Version 1.0 · 29.08.2026

The solution now is a 90-day pre-project pilot

REQUEST FOR SOLUTION

Territory profile

boundaries · rights · demand · restrictions

Full cycle balance

DAYS

Weight · Water · N/P · Energy · Money

Security and compliance

Prove the model

before construction

Zoning · HACCP · One Health · EAEU

Investment solution

BASE / STRESS / UPSIDE · GO / STOP

DAY 90

GO · GO WITH CONDITIONS · STOP

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Tons of products - only one quarter of safety

SINGLE FRAMEWORK

AVAILABILITY

ACCESS

USAGE

STABILITY

volume · range

Stock · Seasonality

price · radius

off-take · coverage

safety · power supply

water · sanitation

reserve · dependence

Recovery Time

Global context · SOFI 2026 · Data for 2025 year

645 million

2,1 billion

2,69 billion

experienced hunger

Moderate/Severe Insecurity

Can't afford a healthy diet

PROJECT CONCLUSION

Field, processing, cold, logistics and access are designed simultaneously

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Russia: a strong base issue, but different contours

MINISELHOZ ASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR 2025

PRODUCT

170%

161%

Threshold 95%

Grain

128,8%

Threshold 85%

Fish

102%

Threshold 85%

Meat

97,9%

Threshold 95%

Potatoes

89,6%

Threshold 90%

Vegetables

85,3%

Threshold 90%

Milk

Threshold 60%

Fruits/berries

Estimate of the Ministry of agriculture from 13.02.2026; this is not the final balance of Rosstat

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The full cycle is the embrace of the chain, not the myth of total autonomy.

WORKING DEFINITION

Hermetic installation without external entrances

managed agrobiocenosis with audited balance sheets

SOIL

FAMILY

PRODUCT

PROCESSING

COLD

THE MARKET

↕ water · N/P/K · Organics · energy · Data · money ↕

EXTERNAL ENTRANCE

CONTROLLED EXIT

seeds · minerals · spare parts · net

Product · Licensed waste · Salt · Emissions

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Product goes forward; resources come back through barriers

THROUGH THE THROUGH CYCLE

Food is unidirectional

raw materials → issue → review

Water — fit-for-purpose

Each appointment has its own admission

Organics after analysis

compost / biogas / export

Cycles are disconnected

buffer · bypass · insulation

Everything has a passport.

ID · quality · owner · status

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

19 modules are assembled on the territory - not by template

MODULAR ARCHITECTURE

NATURAL BASIS

boundaries · soil · water · genetic resources

PRODUCTION

field · greenhouse · feed · animals · poultry · aquaculture

PROCESSING AND MARKET

processing · processing · storage · logistics

SECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

wind/phytocontrol · water/energy · laboratory/data

MANAGEMENT AND KNOWLEDGE

Finance/operator · training/Heritage archive

Only the module with proven resources, operator, security and market is included

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

You need to close the resources - not infection and pollution

FLOWS AND BARRIERS

FOOD FLOW

CHEESE

CONTROL

PROCESSING

COLD

MARKET / REVIEWS

RESOURCE PETLES

SOIL / CORM

WATER

ORGANIC

ENERGY

N/P/K · field capacity

Separate networks · tolerance

Category · processing · analysis

12Monthly balance · Reserve

unprocessed manure → Food/Aquaculture · Unknown waste → Feed · dirty water → net net net

Stock → normal compost · unverified digestate → field · manure transport → clean zone

RED LINES

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

One Health: One Headquarters for Four Related Risks

BIOSECURITY

PEOPLE

ANIMALS

Health · Hygiene

Work · Food

quarantine · diseases

Feed · AMR

SINGLE HQ

Veterinarian ·

HACCP · ecologist · Laboratory

occupational safety · communication with authorities

PLANTS

ECOSYSTEM

seeds · pests

pesticides · soil

water · wild fauna

waste · biodiversity

HOLD

ZONE STOP

MOVEMENT STOP

SITE STOP

Party

zone/line

Movement

Playground

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Biocenosis point turns signal into testable solution

EQUILIBRIUM · MONITORING

FONNY

ATTENTION

EMERGENCY

RECONSTRUCTION

planned control

Trend to the threshold

Stop / Retention

Phased Returns

Data and responsibilities are shared

SOURCE

REGISTER

MODEL

ARCHIVE

HERITAGE

Sensor · Laboratory

ID · version · communication

balance · forecast

Version

evidence

Law

DECISION

EXECUTION

VERIFICATION

person · threshold

item · fact · cost

Repeat · independent withdrawal

PROJECT PURPOSE OF THE PILOT

≥95% games with full traceability · Test Review ≤2 Hours

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Compliance is designed by product and process

COMPLIANCE-BY-DESIGN

VOLUNTARY / CONTRACT STANDARDS

ISO / GOST / Buyer's specification - if applicable

INTERNATIONAL METHODS

Codex GHP/HACCP · One Health · WOAH · IPPC

PRODUCTS TECHGLAMENTS

Grain 015 · Milk 033 · Meat 034 · fish 040 · Bird 051

MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS of the Russian Federation / EAEU

TR CU 021/2011 · 022/2011 · Veterinary Medicine · Phytosanitary · water · waste

Matrix: product → raw materials → Operation → form of assessment → Laboratory → Document → Owner

HACCP-procedures are mandatory for TR CU 021/2011; voluntary certificate does not replace their execution

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The economy is considered a portfolio and monthly cash flow

FINANCIAL MODEL

INCOME

Three mandatory scenarios

Fresh products

BASE

STRESS

UPSIDE

Reprocessing

planned demand and harvest

Price · Harvest · Energy · Logistics

cooperative · download · assortment

Seeds / Seedlings

NO DOUBLE ACCOUNT

Food and Services

By-flow - either revenue or avoided consumption

COSTS AND RESERVES

Cost = OPEX / commodity issue

CAPEX · OPEX · Working capital · Biosimple · Insurance

NPV · IRR · DSCR — Only after confirmed CAPEX, OPEX, Prices and off-take

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Monitoring, money, execution and verification are separated

ECOSYSTEM OF MANAGEMENT

STRATEGIC SOLUTION

person approves target · mode · budget · exception

BIOCENOSIS

POINT

EQUILIBRIUM

ECO‑PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

VERIFICATION

+ ARCHIVE

Signal

forecast

resources / contracts

execution

Result / Version

RF CCI

ASI

Security Council

Controller

Business Contour

Barriers and scale

Strategic coordination

Daily Responsibility

INDEPENDENCE

The adjuster does not confirm the result alone

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

In 90 days - five gates of evidence

PILOT PLAN

1–15

16–30

31–55

56–75

76–90

mandate

and borders

baseline

and flows

options

and double

economy

and stress test

Audit

GO / STOP

Weekend Package

PASSPORT

BALANCE

SAFETY

territory · right · demand

mass · water · N/P · energy

Zones · HACCP · One Health

REQUIREMENTS

ECONOMY

DECISION

the Russian Federation / EAEU

CAPEX · OPEX · off-take

conditions and the next tranche

Pilot builds proof and limited demonstrator - not the whole farm

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Approve the pilot under four protective conditions

DECISION

Documentary mandate for the territory and data

Independent verification and decision log

Banning the main CAPEX before passing Gate

Versions and proofs in the Heritage Archive

owner of the solution · 1–3 Territory · grocery basket · the Survey Protocol · Stage Budget 1

NEXT 10 DAYS

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Sources cited in presentation 21

  • https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/45106
  • https://www.fao.org/cfs/policy-products/voluntary-guidelines-and-policy-recommendations/global-strategic-framework-for-food-security---nutrition
  • https://www.fao.org/agroecology/overview/the-10-elements-of-agroecology/en
  • https://eec.eaeunion.org/comission/department/deptexreg/tr/PischevayaProd.php
  • https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/food-systems-2030
  • https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/cd8306en
  • https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2026/goal-02/
  • https://www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe/insights/news-insights/news-detail/ensuring-food-security--why-agency-and-sustainability-matter/en
  • https://mcx.gov.ru/press-service/news/v-2025-godu-rossiya-ukrepila-prodovolstvennuyu-bezopasnost-po-klyuchevym-pozitsiyam/
  • https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202503100058
  • https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/cd1948en
  • https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/
  • https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/i4021e
  • https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/jp/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXG%2B100-2023%252FCXG_100e.pdf
  • https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/6866dc55-d2c0-48dd-a528-a4d634f1b0b4/content
  • https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202207140005
  • https://www.who.int/news/item/14-08-2026-quadripartite-collaboration-extends-the-one-health-joint-plan-of-action-to-2029
  • https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/
  • https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102023486
  • https://eec.eaeunion.org/comission/department/deptexreg/tr/PischevkaMarkirovka.php
  • https://eec.eaeunion.org/comission/department/deptexreg/tr/TR_general.php

Published files

ECO-PPA · Full published text

ECO-PPA: Small-Scale Power Generation, Eco-Modules, Biotic Communities and Robotics

Source Status: Primary Document

An integrated programme combining small-scale power generation, eco-modules, biotic communities, robotics and validation of results.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/eco-ppa-minigeneratsiya-i-ekomoduli

Open on the site

Validation and engineering reliability tools

Strategic Science and Engineering Concept

Version 1.0 • 2026

1. Strategic framework

ECO-PPA is considered as a distributed full-cycle science and engineering system that combines local energy sustainability, environmental technology modules, biocenose monitoring, robotic measuring and impact tools, and an independent data and technology validation circuit. The goal is to move from disparate environmental and energy projects to a reproducible architecture, where each object has a measurable input, a digital passport, a set of scientifically based indicators, confirmed efficiency and scaling procedure.

1.1. Formula of the system

ENERGYWEDNESDAYOBSERVATIONACTIONTRUST

Minigeneration + Ecomodules + Biocenous monitoring + Scientific Robotics + Validation = Reproduced ECO-PPA-cycle.

1.2. Principles

• Modularity: The system is assembled from standardized blocks for territory and task.

• Autonomy: basic functions are retained when external infrastructure is disrupted.

• Measurability: Each exposure is associated with a baseline, indicators, and a control measurement.

• Traceability: data, methodology, instrument, calibration, algorithm and solution are linked by a single digital footprint.

• Validation before scaling: the pilot must prove the technological, environmental and operational effect.

• Humans and biocenoses are considered in one balance: technology should not improve one indicator at the cost of degradation of another.

2. Architecture ECO-PPA

Contour A. Minigeneration

Energy supply of environmental modules, robotics, communications and critical loads.

Contour B. Ecomodules

Cleaning and restoration of water, air, soil; management of organic and technological flows.

Contour C. Biocenoses

Observation of the dynamics of the atmosphere, water, soils, vegetation, microorganisms, animals and anthropogenic load.

Contour D. Scientific Robotics

Autonomous sampling and data collection, inspection, mapping, point exposure, maintenance.

Contour E. Validation

Metrology, calibration, V&V, data quality control, independent effect assessment.

Contour F. The Digital Double

Unified model of object and territory: configuration, history, data, modes, forecast, risk, life cycle.

Contour G. Management

Pilot portfolio, regulations, security, data collections, rights, scaling and interagency cooperation.

3. Minigeneration

Minigeneration is not a separate energy project, but a support layer of the autonomy of ECO-PPA. Its task is to provide guaranteed power to the measuring network, pumps, sorption and membrane installations, server nodes, communications, robotics and emergency loads.

3.1. Basic configuration

• Solar generation as a basic rapidly deployable source.

• Small wind power is where the wind resource is confirmed.

• Gas, biogas, hydrogen or other compact generation is based on a feasibility study and environmental assessment.

• Energy storage for peak smoothing and critical autonomy.

• A microgrid with intelligent load management.

• Reservation of communication and control; possibility of "island" mode.

3.2. Minigeneration passport

ParameterWhat is fixedCriterion
Powernominal, peak, critical loadPower Balance
Autonomyworking hours without external networknot below the specified scenario
System efficiencygeneration + accumulation + conversionMeasurement Confirmation
Ecological footprintemissions, noise, materials, wasteProject Limits
ReliabilityFailures, degradation, accessibilityMTBF/MTTR and availability
Digital Observabilitytelemetry, events, accidents100% critical parameters

4. Ecomodules

An eco-module is a standardized technological unit that solves a specific task of restoring or protecting the environment and is included in the overall measurement and validation system.

CodePurposeWithdrawal
WATERWater preparation and purification, local aftertreatment, turnaround cycles, quality monitoring.Measured result + digital passport + validation protocol
AIRLocal air purification, aerosol and pollutant capture, microclimate control.Measured result + digital passport + validation protocol
SOILDiagnosis and restoration of soils, stabilization, sorption, bioremediation, fertility control.Measured result + digital passport + validation protocol
BIOBiological processes: composting, biofiltration, microbiological contours.Measured result + digital passport + validation protocol
WASTESorting, pre-processing and useful use of individual streams.Measured result + digital passport + validation protocol
LABField laboratory module: preparation of samples, express analysis, calibration of instruments.Measured result + digital passport + validation protocol
DATALocal computing node: collection, cleaning, temporary storage and data transfer.Measured result + digital passport + validation protocol

5. Biocenoses as an object of management

The biocenose approach changes the unit of analysis: instead of a separate pollutant or infrastructure object, a system of interrelationships between the living and inanimate environment is observed. For ECO-PPA, this means that the technological impact is estimated on a whole set of interdependent indicators.

LayerObserved parameters
Atmospheretemperature, humidity, aerosols, gases, dust, local circulation
Waterphysicochemical indicators, biogenic elements, microbiology, current, bottom sediments
Soilstructure, humidity, pH, organic matter, pollutants, microbiome
Plantsspecies composition, status index, phenology, stress, productivity
Animalsspecies observations, routes, numbers, indicator groups
Microorganismsbioindication, activity, resistance and response to exposure
Personexposure, access to resources, noise, microclimate, quality of environment
Technogenic loadenergy, transport, emissions, discharges, waste, physical effects

5.1. Biocenosis monitoring point

• Stationary sensors + Mobile Meters + laboratory tests;

• aerial surveillance by unmanned systems;

• ground and water robotics;

• Satellite and cartographic data;

• bioindication and expert observations;

• single time series and digital twin territory.

6. Tools, mechanisms and scientific robotics

ClassFunctionRequirement
Field robotsroute monitoring, sampling, mapping, inspection of hard-to-reach areasPassport, metrology, mission log, provable accuracy
UAVsaerial photography, multispectral photography, gas analysis, thermal controlPassport, metrology, mission log, provable accuracy
Submarineshydrochemistry, bathymetry, sediments, inspection of structuresPassport, metrology, mission log, provable accuracy
Robotic manipulatorswork with samples, dosing, repeated laboratory proceduresPassport, metrology, mission log, provable accuracy
Autonomous stationslong series of observations and automatic data transmissionPassport, metrology, mission log, provable accuracy
Robots of Influencepoint aeration, cleaning, application of sorbent or biopreparation according to the task mapPassport, metrology, mission log, provable accuracy
Intelligent Mechanismsadaptive control of pumps, ventilation, energy and technological modesPassport, metrology, mission log, provable accuracy

6.1. The scientific robot as a measuring device

Key requirement: a robotic platform should not be considered just a means of delivering a sensor. It becomes part of the measurement chain. Therefore, the mission passport includes coordinates, trajectory, speed, orientation, sensor state, time, calibration, environment conditions, processing algorithm and software version.

7. Validation Tools

The validation circuit answers three questions: whether it was measured correctly; whether it was interpreted correctly; whether the technology has been proven to improve the system and not create hidden damage.

ToolContentsResult
Metrologycalibration, traceability, measurement uncertaintyTrusted status / comments / limits of applicability
Verification of datacompleteness, temporary synchronization, emissions, duplicates, anomaliesTrusted status / comments / limits of applicability
V&V modelsComparison of calculation with experiment and independent dataTrusted status / comments / limits of applicability
Control of methodsprotocol version, conditions of applicability, interlaboratory comparisonTrusted status / comments / limits of applicability
Validation of effectbefore/after, control points, seasonality, causalityTrusted status / comments / limits of applicability
Audit of algorithmsmodel version, training data, stability, drift monitoringTrusted status / comments / limits of applicability
Evidentiary packagingprotocol, source data, graphs, certificates, change logTrusted status / comments / limits of applicability

7.1. Recommended framework of standards

Principles can be used as a basis for design ISO/IEC 17025 (Competence of testing and calibration laboratories), ISO/IEC 17029 (validation and verification), W3C PROV (origin and traceability of data), OAIS/PREMIS (long-term preservation of digital objects) and approaches NIST AI RMF/TEVV for evaluation AIcomponents. Specific applicability is determined by object type and procedure.

8. Digital passport ECO-PPA

• object/module/robot/sensor identifier;

• owner, operator and responsible scientific center;

• geography and operating conditions;

• hardware configuration and software version;

• serial numbers, calibrations and inter-verification intervals;

• processing algorithms and model versions;

• source data and their origin;

• Performance indicators and environmental constraints;

• log of changes, repairs, failures and incidents;

• validation status and evidence base.

9. Full cycle pilot

1. Basic diagnostics of territory and energy consumption.

2. Formation of biocenosis map and risks.

3. Selection of the configuration of minigeneration and ecomodules.

4. Deployment of sensors and robotic tools.

5. Create a digital twin and a pilot’s passport.

6. Period of control measurements before technological impact.

7. Operation and adaptive management.

8. Independent validation of the effect.

9. Economic, environmental and operational assessment.

10. Solution: revision, re-pilot or replication.

10. Matrix of indicators

ContourBasic KPIEvidenceRisk
Energyautonomy, availability, efficiency, cost of energyTelemetry + balanceLack of generation/accumulation
Waterreduction of pollutants, consumption, reuseLaboratory + online sensorsTransfer of pollution to another stream
Airconcentrations, dust, microclimateCalibrated AnalyzersLocal effect without system improvement
Soilpollutants, organics, biological activitySamples + spatial mapSecondary toxicity
BiocenosisStatus and Sustainability IndexSeries of observationsSeasonality and False Causality
Roboticscoating, accuracy, autonomy, safetyMission Lognavigation/sensor failure
Datacompleteness, delay, quality, originautomatic auditLoss of context/versions
ValidationPercentage of effects confirmedV&V protocolConflict of interest

11. Scientific and engineering roles

Scientific integrator: methodology, models, research program, expert assessment

Engineering integrator: module configuration, mechanics, reliability, life cycle

Metrological partner: calibration, methods, uncertainty, control of the measuring chain

Operator of the territory: operation, security, interaction with local infrastructure

Technology developers: equipment, software, robotics, service

Data center: storage, knowledge graph, digital twin, access and archive

Independent validation: Checking the effect and evidence base before scaling

12. Interaction with IMASH RAS

As part of ECO-PPA, the Institute of Mechanical Engineering can act as a scientific and engineering center for mechanics, reliability, resource, robotic platforms, digital twins, experimental stands and validation of mechanical and mechatronic systems. This creates a practical training ground where engineering works directly on the tasks of sustainability of natural and technical systems.

• calculation of strength, vibrations and life of modular equipment;

• creation and testing of mobile robotic platforms;

• study of cleaning, mixing, dosing and transportation mechanisms;

• digital twin drives, pumps, turbomachines and autonomous units;

• V&V models and experimental methods;

• forming library of failures and engineering lessons ECO-PPA.

13. Road map

PeriodResult
0–6 monthspilot architecture, technology register, basic diagnostics methods, composition of scientific partners
6–12 monthsdeployment of mini-generation, 2–4 eco-modules, sensor network and robotic platforms
12–18 monthsaccumulation of seasonal data, digital twin, mode adjustment, first independent validation
18–24 monthsConfirmation KPI, economic model, standard passport of replication
2–5 yearspilot network, industry profiles ECO-PPA, standard kits and national validation base

14. Final model

ECO-PPA = ENERGY + RESTORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT + OBSERVATION + ROBOTIZED ACTION + PROOF

The idea is not to create a set of devices, but a trusted replicable technological system. Each pilot becomes simultaneously an object of economic efficiency, a scientific experiment, a source of standardized data and an element of the overall development management system.

Other published edition: Strategic scientific and engineering concept • 2026 ECO-PPA_Minigeneration_Ecomodules_Biocenoses_Robotics_Validation.pptx · Web Text +

01 / STRATEGIC MODEL

ECO-PPA as a full cycle system

ENERGY

WEDNESDAY

OBSERVATION

ACTION

TRUST

Minigeneration and accumulation

Eco-modules of recovery

Biocenoses and Sensory

Scientific Robotics

Validation and evidence

The goal is to turn a set of technologies into a reproducible architecture, where each effect is measured, traced and confirmed before scaling.

02 / ARCHITECTURE

7 Architecture

A. Minigeneration

B. Ecomodules

C. Biocenoses

D. Robotics

Energy autonomy

water, air, soil, bioprocesses

Observation of the living and non-living environment

data collection, inspection, impact

E. Validation

F. The Digital Double

G. Management

metrology, V&V, data quality

history, forecast, risk, life cycle

Pilot Portfolio and Scaling

03 / ENERGY CONTOUR

Minigeneration - the support layer of autonomy

Sources

Accumulation and microgrid

Loads

Verify

Solar Generation Small Wind Power Compact Generation Backup Source

Energy storage Intelligent distribution Island mode Critical loads priority

Sensors Communication Pumps Cleaning Robots Computing

Power Autonomy Efficiency Reliability Ecotide Telemetry

04 / MODULAR INFRASTRUCTURE

Ecomodules — technological bodies of the system

WATER

AIR

SOIL

BIO

water treatment and circulation

air purification and microclimate

Soil restoration

Biofiltration and Bioprocesses

WASTE

LAB

DATA

management of individual flows

Field analysis and sample preparation

local computing node

05 / LIVE SYSTEM

Biocenoses — object of observation and evaluation

Person

Microorganisms

Technogenic load

BIOCENOSIS DYNAMICS

Animals

Atmosphere

Plants

Water

Soil

06 / INSTRUMENTS

Biocenosis monitoring point

Stationary sensors

Mobile devices

UAVs

Ground robots

Continuous time series

Route Measurements

multi-spectrum, gas analysis, thermal control

Mapping and sampling

Submarines

Laboratory

Satellite data

Expert Bioindication

hydrochemistry and bottom sediments

Control analyses

Wide territorial context

Types and ecosystem reactions

07 / ROBOTISED CONTOUR

Scientific robotics - measurement and action

Field robots

UAVs

Submarines

route monitoring and mapping

Aerial observation and remote measurement

Inspection of water bodies and structures

Manipulators

Autonomous stations

Robots of Influence

Repeated laboratory operations

Long series of observations

spot cleaning, aeration, dosing

Intelligent Mechanisms

adaptive control of technological modes

The robot is considered as part of the measurement chain: trajectory, sensor, calibration, time, software version and processing algorithm are included in the evidence package.

08 / CONTOUR OF ENGINEERING CERTIFICATE

Validation Tools

Metrology

Verification of data

V&V models

Control of methods

calibration, traceability, uncertainty

completeness, synchronization, anomalies

calculation ↔ experiment ↔ independent data

version, conditions of applicability, comparison

Validation of effect

Audit of algorithms

Evidentiary packaging

before/after, control, seasonality

version, stability, drift

protocol, data, graphs, change log

09 / PROOF ARCHITECTURE

Chain of confidence in the result

SEATTLE

CAlibrovka

CHEESE DATA

PROCESSING

MODEL

EFFECT

INDEPENDENT V&V

Only the final schedule cannot be validated. Trust is built across the data chain, from the instrument and measurement conditions to the algorithm version and independent effect verification.

10 / TRAILABILITY

Digital passport of each element

Object, module, robot and sensor ID

owner and operator

Geography and operating conditions

Software configuration and version

serial numbers and calibrations

Algorithms and Model Versions

Origin of data

KPI and environmental constraints

repairs, failures, incidents

Validation status and evidence base

11 / FROM DIAGNOSTICS TO TYRE

Full cycle pilot

Diagnostics

Map of biocenosis

Configuration

Deployment

Digital twin

Control before

Operation

Independent V&V

Evaluation

Circulation

12 / MEASUREMENT

Matrix KPI and risks

Energy

Water

Air

Soil

autonomy • efficiency • availability Risk: lack of reserve

quality • flow • reuse Risk: pollution transfer

Concentrations • Dust • Microclimate Risk: Local Effect

Contaminants • Organic • Bioactivity Risk: Secondary Toxicity

Biocenosis

Robots

Data

Validation

Sustainability • Species Indicators Risk: Seasonality

coverage • accuracy • autonomy Risk: navigation/sensor failure

completeness • delay • origin Risk: loss of context

Proportion of effects confirmed Risk: Conflict of interest

13 / ROLES

Scientific and engineering cooperation

Data Center

Independent Validation

Technology Developers

ECO-PPA CONSORT

Scientific integrator

Territory Operator

Engineering integrator

Metrological partner

14 / MACHINERY FOR NATURAL AND TECHNICAL SYSTEMS

IMASH RAS in ECO-PPA

• strength, vibration, life and reliability of modular equipment;

• mobile robotic platforms and sampling mechanisms;

• pumps, actuators, aeration, dosing, mixing and transportation;

• digital twins of machines, nodes and autonomous installations;

• V&V models, stands and experimental techniques;

• library of failures and engineering lessons ECO-PPA.

15 / FROM PILOT TO NETWORK

Road map

Architecture

technology registry • basic diagnostics • partners

0–6 months

Deployment

minigeneration • 2–4 ecomodule • sensors • robots

6–12 months

Evidence

seasonal data • digital twin • first V&V

12–18 months

Standardization

KPI • economy • the Multiplier Passport

18–24 months

Scaling

Network of Pilots • standard sets • Validation Base

2–5 years

ECO-PPA ENERGY + RESTORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT + OBSERVATION + ROBOTIZED ACTION + PROOF Not a set of devices, but a trusted reproducible technological system.

Published files

ECO-PPA · Full published text

Biotic Communities

Source Status: Primary Document

Living territorial system of Russia

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/biotsenozy-eco-ppa

Open on the site

Nature · people · production · energy · data

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO‑PPA · EQUILIBRIUM

Strategic presentation · 2026

Biocenosis is not an object, but a working system

BIOCENOSIS · ECO‑PPA

The territory is considered as a single living contour, where stability arises from the connections between the elements.

BIOCENOSIS

Restoring natural capital

NATURE

HUMANITY

Provides water, energy and food

Creates jobs and local cooperation

INFRASTRUCTURE

ECONOMY

Measure status and result in real time

Seven contours form a complete biocenosis

BIOCENOSIS · ECO‑PPA

Natural

Housing

soil, water, forest, biodiversity

healthy environment and infrastructure

Energetic

Production

mini-generation and accumulation

non-waste cooperation

Water

cleaning, turnover, recovery

Digital

EQUILIBRIUM and Evidence

Food

Agroecology and Local Chains

Closed loops turn costs into resources

BIOCENOSIS · ECO‑PPA

ENERGY

MATERIALS

Local generation

Repair and return to cycle

WATER

BIOCENOSIS

FOOD

Cleaning and reuse

short chains

Balance of flows and needs

DATA

BIOMASS

Observation and Forecast

soil and restoration

Ecomodule — the practical core of biocenosis

BIOCENOSIS · ECO‑PPA

The first result should be visible on the territory, not just in the report.

ECOMODUL

Modular infrastructure for quick launch of vital functions of the territory.

Fast piloting

Scaling by model solutions

Water

Energy

Food

Local production and service

Waste

Environment

Data

Measured effect according to a single method

Four platforms hold the unity of the program

BIOCENOSIS · ECO‑PPA

ECO‑PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

program and resources

cooperation and execution

data and verification

Initiatives and Participation

What to do

Who does

What is proved

Who it is for

A single passport of the territory connects goals, performers, resources and indicators.

State Council collects biocenosis as an inter-commission program

BIOCENOSIS · ECO‑PPA

CommissionSubject of the programResult
Environmental Well-beingRestoration of natural systemsthe Leading Commission
Energymini-generation and sustainabilityEnergy Pilot
Infrastructure for LifeIntegrated Territory Developmentinclusion in master plans
Industryequipment and localizationCo-operation Order
Technological leadershipEQUILIBRIUM and R&Dexamination and testing
InvestmentsPPP and project financingfinancial model

Entry format: inter-commission working group → Pilot subjects → Confirmed result.

The pilot passes three steps to the federal scale

BIOCENOSIS · ECO‑PPA

PREPARATION

PILOT

MASSHTAB

Passport of the territory

Expertise

Baseline indicators

Ecomodules

mini-generation

Regional Headquarters

Verification

the State Council Decision

Propagation

3–5 pilot subjects

Unified method of evaluation

The Federal Model

The result is measured by five groups of indicators

BIOCENOSIS · ECO‑PPA

NATURE

RESOURCES

ECONOMY

HUMANITY

GOVERNANCE

Water and soil quality

biodiversity

Renovated Square

Local Energy

Re-use of water

Return of materials

Jobs

Localization

Cost of life cycle

Health Environment

availability of services

Participation of residents

Timeline

Transparency

confirmation of the result

EQUILIBRIUM records the initial state, implementation progress and confirmed effect.

Launch of the interregional program "Biocenosis of Russia"

DECISION

Proposed mandate

PILOT

Create an inter-commission working group

18 months

Select 3–5 pilot territories

From the original passport

to the confirmed result

Conduct an independent examination

Approve a unified methodology of indicators

SPECZASHCHITA · ECO‑PPA · EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA

Sources cited in presentation 2

  • Conceptual model of the program SPECZASHCHITA — ECO‑PPA — EQUILIBRIUM, Working materials, 2026.
  • Title Visual: AI-generated by OpenAI, 2026.

Other published edition: Biocenoses_EQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

the EQUILIBRIUM

From observing nature to managing the restoration, financing and sustainability of territories.

TETTA + 13×20 + EFS

EQUILIBRIUM / BIOCENOSIS • 1

What is biocenosis

Not a set of species, but a network of living together on the territory.

PLANTS

ANIMALS

MICROB

Biocenosis = community of organisms + nutrition bond + metabolism + joint adaptation.

In management logic, this is not “ecology”, but the basic unit of health of the territory.

SOIL

WATER

HUMANITY

EQUILIBRIUM / BIOCENOSIS • 2

Biocenosis as an object of management

The territory begins to be read as a living organism.

1

Watch

2

Understand the connection

3

Find a threat

4

Action

5

Verify

Transition: from scattered environmental reports → to a single biocenous map of the territory.

260

Layers of observation

Levels of decision

Areas of influence

Diagnostic Points

Data Layer: Atmosphere → water → soil → Plants → animals → Microorganisms → person.

EQUILIBRIUM / BIOCENOSIS • 3

13×20: Biocenosis Matrix

The vertical is the maturity of the decision. Horizontal - areas of life of the territory.

Each cell is a management question: “What happens to this sphere at this level of depth?”

Example: Level 8 × Ecology = where the flow of matter is interrupted.

Level 11 × Finance = What to pay for now.

Level 13 × Territories = What changed after the intervention.

Center: TETTA

EQUILIBRIUM / BIOCENOSIS • 4

TETTA for Biocenoses

A digital brain that holds the connection between nature, economics, and decisions.

DATA

Sensors / Satellites / People

ANALYSIS

13×20 / risks / communications

MEANING

Recovery Goals

ACTION

projects / EFS / control

TETTA does not “replace” a person. It shows where the gap is: in data, meaning, resources, structure, or execution.

feedback

result → correction

EQUILIBRIUM / BIOCENOSIS • 5

Biocenosis monitoring point

The minimum unit of field observation: the “sensation organ” of the territory.

Atmosphere

dust, gas, humidity

Water

quality, flow, biota

Soil

microbiome, chemistry

Plants

stress, growth, cover

Animals

Types of migration

Person

load, health

The task of the point is not just to collect indicators, but to link them into a picture of causes and consequences.

EQUILIBRIUM / BIOCENOSIS • 6

EFS: Money as a Recoverable Flow

Financing is not tied to the report, but to the change in the state of the biocenosis.

THE PROBLEM

degradation

PROJECT

Recovery

EFS

earmarked funds

WORK

on the ground

EFFECT

measured

Smart money passport: target → route → admissible expenses → terms → result indicator → automatic feedback.

Example: funds can be directed to water treatment, soil restoration and planting; it is impossible to withdraw from the project without a confirmed effect.

EQUILIBRIUM / BIOCENOSIS • 7

Index EQUILIBRIUM biocenosis

One indicator does not replace nature, but helps to manage complexity.

biodiversity

water

soil

Flows of substances

Sustainability

human load

Dynamics

Index = status + change direction + recovery price

It is needed not for a beautiful rating, but for the choice of action: where to intervene urgently, where to leave the self-healing system, where to turn on the EFS.

GREEN

self-regulation

YELLOW

correction

RED

Emergency Action

EQUILIBRIUM / BIOCENOSIS • 8

Pilot: biocenous contour of the region

Don’t start with the whole country. Start with one area and prove the result.

1. Choose a territory

2. Set monitoring points

3. Calculate the index

4. Launch EFS projects

5. Check the effect

The result of the pilot: a risk map, a list of projects, a measurable effect, a financial scaling mechanism.

EQUILIBRIUM / BIOCENOSIS • 9

Final model

Biocenoses are becoming the basis of natural security and recovery economics.

BIOCENOSIS

TETTA

EFS

Living condition of the territory

Analytical Brain

Target flows

Launch formula: monitoring → index → project → smart money → measurable effect → scaling.

Next step: MVP region

EQUILIBRIUM / BIOCENOSIS • 10

Published files

ECO-PPA · Full published text

Biotic Community Monitoring Point

Source Status: Primary Document

A territory’s “digital sensory organ”

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/biotsenoznaya-tochka-monitoringa

Open on the site

Autonomous natural and technical complex of observation, early warning and confirmation of the environmental result

EQUILIBRIUM · SFERA · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

Version 1.0 · 20 August 2026

1. Definition

The biocenose monitoring point is an autonomous natural and technical complex that continuously monitors not only the individual parameters of air, water or soil, but also the state of the local ecosystem as a single living organism.

It combines environmental sensors, biological observations, photo and acoustic fixation, communication with the digital platform EQUILIBRIUM and early warning mechanisms.

2. Appointment

The point should answer five basic questions:

  1. What happens to the ecosystem?
  2. Which changes are natural and which are dangerous?
  3. Where is the likely source of impact?
  4. How does a change in one element affect the entire biocenosis?
  5. What actions are necessary to restore the natural balance?

The object of observation is the entire local biocenosis:

Atmosphere → water → soil → Plants → animals → Microorganisms → person → man-made load

3. Composition of the biocenous point

3.1. Atmospheric module

Controls:

  • temperature and humidity;
  • atmospheric pressure;
  • wind speed and direction;
  • Amount of rain;
  • solar radiation;
  • PM₁, PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀;
  • CO, CO₂, NO₂, SO₂, O₃;
  • methane, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide;
  • volatile organic compounds;
  • smoke, pollen and aerosol particles.

The module allows you to detect pollution, determine the direction of its spread and establish a link between emissions and the state of plants, animals and humans.

3.2. Soil Module

Includes sensors placed at several depths:

  • temperature;
  • humidity;
  • pH;
  • electrical conductivity;
  • salinity;
  • oxidation-reduction potential;
  • oxygen content and CO₂;
  • Groundwater level.

Laboratory analysis is carried out periodically:

  • heavy metals;
  • petroleum products;
  • Pesticides;
  • microplastics;
  • organic matter;
  • nitrogen, phosphorus and other nutrients;
  • Composition of soil microbiota.

3.3. Water module

It is installed in the presence of a river, stream, lake, swamp, spring, well or reservoir. Measure:

  • water level and temperature;
  • pH;
  • confusion;
  • electrical conductivity;
  • dissolved oxygen;
  • redox potential;
  • nitrate and ammonium content;
  • chlorophyll;
  • signs of flowering and development of cyanobacteria;
  • availability of petroleum products.

The automatic sampling probe stores the samples when an anomaly is detected so that the results can be confirmed in the laboratory.

3.4. Phytomonitoring

Controls the state of the plant community:

  • species composition;
  • density and area of vegetation;
  • flowering time, fruiting and November;
  • The growth rate of trees;
  • crown condition;
  • humidity and temperature of the leaves;
  • content of chlorophyll;
  • signs of drought, diseases and damage by pests;
  • accumulation of pollutants in plants.

Tools:

  • phenological camera;
  • multispectral camera;
  • dendrometers;
  • juice sensors;
  • moisture sensors of the sheet;
  • Periodic analysis of plant samples.

3.5. Monitoring of the animal world

Includes:

  • photo traps;
  • acoustic recorders;
  • ultrasonic detectors of bats;
  • automatic bird registration;
  • registration of amphibians;
  • monitoring of pollinator insects;
  • hydrophones for aquatic organisms;
  • registration of tracks, nests and migration routes.

Artificial intelligence pre-identifies species, estimates their number and detects behavior changes.

Particularly important are the types of indicators that respond quickly to environmental degradation:

  • lichens;
  • mosses;
  • bees and other pollinators;
  • amphibians;
  • and invertebrates;
  • Different types of fish and birds.

3.6. Microbiological module

Microorganisms often react to pollution before large animals and plants. Controlled by:

  • composition of soil and water microbiota;
  • microbiological activity of the soil;
  • pathogenic microorganisms;
  • processes of decomposition of organic matter;
  • the appearance of toxic algae;
  • Environmental DNA is eDNA.

Analysis of eDNA allows you to detect the presence of plants, animals and microorganisms by genetic traces in water, soil and air.

3.7. Physical factors

The point registers:

  • noise;
  • infrasound;
  • vibration;
  • lighting;
  • light pollution;
  • electromagnetic fields;
  • radiation background;
  • Local thermal anomalies.

This allows to take into account roads, industry, construction and infrastructure as factors of influence on biocenosis.

3.8. Visual Module

Consists of:

  • observation camera;
  • panoramic camera;
  • thermal imager;
  • phenological chamber;
  • surveillance cameras of the sky;
  • If necessary, a controlled drone.

Computer vision reveals:

  • smoke and fire;
  • cutting;
  • illegal landfills;
  • change in water level;
  • degradation of vegetation;
  • the appearance of invasive species;
  • movement of animals;
  • presence of equipment and people.

4. Design of point

The base point is a modular mast with a height of approximately 3–10 meters with an anti-vandal body.

The composition includes:

  • meteorological unit;
  • gas and dust sensors;
  • cameras and acoustic recorders;
  • ground computing controller;
  • soil probes;
  • water probe in the presence of a water body;
  • automatic sampling probe;
  • satellite navigation;
  • secure communication system;
  • solar panels;
  • battery;
  • backup power supply;
  • lightning protection;
  • self-diagnosis system.

5. Working modes

The point operates in four modes.

5.1. Background Mode

It fixes natural daily, seasonal and multi-year cycles. At this stage, a digital environmental passport of the territory is formed.

5.2. High-priority regime

It is included with a steady deviation of one or more indicators from the normal range. For example:

  • Decreased oxygen in water;
  • Increased dust concentration;
  • disappearance of the indicator type;
  • unusual increase in soil temperature;
  • A sharp reduction in acoustic activity of birds.

5.3. Emergency mode

It is launched in case of fire, toxic release, water pollution, radiation anomaly or mass death of organisms. Point:

  • increases the frequency of measurements;
  • preserves primary data;
  • activates photo and video fixation;
  • performs automatic sampling;
  • transmits a signal to the responsible services;
  • initiates a survey by a mobile laboratory or UAV.

5.4. Recovery Mode

After removing the source of exposure, the point controls whether the biocenosis returns to its original state and whether the declared result of the recovery program is achieved.

6. Biocenosis index

Instead of scattered indicators, the point forms an integral index of the state of biocenosis. It may include seven groups:

BlockWhat is evaluated
AirClean and safe atmosphere
WaterPhysical-chemical and biological quality
SoilFertility, pollution and microbiological activity
PlantsDiversity and Viability
AnimalsNumber, diversity and behaviour
ResilienceThe ecosystem’s ability to recover
PressureAnthropogenic and technogenic load

For each indicator, the following are retained:

  • current value;
  • natural range;
  • speed of change;
  • Seasonal norm;
  • level of risk;
  • Reliability of measurement;
  • The alleged cause;
  • necessary action.

7. Place in the system EQUILIBRIUM

The biocenose point is the primary observation node. The information and management chain is structured as follows:

  1. The biocenous point is primary observation and fixation.
  2. EQUILIBRIUM - collection, comparison, analysis and forecasting.
  3. The digital twin of the territory is a space-time state model.
  4. Early warning - detection of the threat and signal formation.
  5. ECO to PPA is a prevention, response or recovery program.
  6. SPECZASHCHITA - organization of practical execution.
  7. Evaluation of the result is confirmation of the change and restoration of biocenosis.

Roles of participants:

  • EQUILIBRIUM observes, compares data and predicts changes.
  • SFERA gathers initiatives, scientific solutions and participants.
  • ECO-PPA defines a warning or recovery program.
  • SPECZASHCHITA organizes practical execution.
  • The biocenose point confirms the initial state, the fact of impact and the result achieved.

8. Levels of equipment

8.1. Basepoint

  • weather station;
  • PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀;
  • CO₂;
  • noise;
  • radiation background;
  • camera;
  • soil humidity and temperature.

Suitable for mass deployment.

8.2. Expanded Point

Additionally includes:

  • full gas analysis;
  • soil profile;
  • water multiprobe;
  • photo traps;
  • bioacoustics;
  • thermal imager;
  • automatic sampling.

Suitable for forests, water bodies, agricultural areas and sanitary protection zones.

8.3. Reference Biocenous Station

Additionally includes:

  • reference analyzers;
  • laboratory module;
  • eDNA;
  • Spectrometry;
  • automated microscopy;
  • UAVs;
  • satellite verification;
  • constant scientific support.

A reference station acts as a reference center for a network of simpler points.

9. Final model

The value of a point is determined not by the number of sensors installed, but by the ability to link measurement, biological interpretation, early warning, management action and proven environmental result into a single continuous cycle.

Biocenous point → EQUILIBRIUM → ECO‑PPA → SPECZASHCHITA → Confirmed Recovery

Other published editorial board: BIOCENOSE MONITORING POINT BIOcenose_point_monitoring.pptx · Web Text +

A territory’s “digital sensory organ”

Sees · hears · measures · recognizes · confirms

The concept of a monitoring and early response unit

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

The point observes the ecosystem as a single living whole

BIOCENTURY MONITORING

Not a separate device, but a related surveillance complex

ATMOSPHERE

air and climate

The biocenosis point combines physical, chemical and biological data to record causal relationships within the territory.

HYDROSPHERE

water and runoff

SOIL

soil and microbiota

BIOTA

plants and animals

HUMANITY

man-made load

Result: a complete picture of the state and sustainability of biocenosis

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

Five questions turn measurement into a management solution

BIOCENTURY MONITORING

What's changed?

Deterioration from the natural range.

Is it natural?

Comparison with daily and seasonal cycles.

Where's the source?

Connection of wind direction, runoff and technogenic events.

What's the risk?

Assessment of impacts on biota, humans and sustainability.

What do we do?

Response scenario and recovery control.

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

The point architecture connects the seven contours of observation

BIOCENTURY MONITORING

Air

Animals

PM, gases, wind, precipitation

types, numbers, behavior, migrations

Water

Physical Fields

pH, oxygen, turbidity, biogens

noise, vibration, light, radiation

Soil

Visual control

humidity, pH, salts, groundwater

camera, thermal imager, drone

Plants

growth, chlorophyll, stress, phenology

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

One autonomous node works in the field all year round

BIOCENTURY MONITORING

Soil Profile

probes at several depths

FIELD DESIGN

Mast 3–10 m

Water circuit

multiprobe and auto-sampling

Meteoblok · gas and dust sensors · Camera · Acoustics · Local Computer

Edge Analytics

Detection of anomalies on the spot

Solar Panels

Battery and reserve

Secure communication

Self-diagnosis

Contact

LoRaWAN · NB‑IoT · 4G/5G · satellite

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

Four modes provide a full cycle of control

BIOCENTURY MONITORING

Background

Increased attention

Emergency

Restorative

It forms an environmental passport and natural ranges.

Increases measurements with a steady deviation.

It records an event, takes a sample, and transmits an alarm.

Confirms the return of the system to a stable state.

It is not enough to measure - the system must determine the moment of transition to action.

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

From signal to confirmed environmental result

BIOCENTURY MONITORING

SIGNAL

VERIFICATION

SOURCE

RESPONSE

RECONSTRUCTION

Sensor detects deviation

Calibration and confirmatory test

The model determines the probable cause

Services implement action plan

The point proves the effect achieved

The data preserves time, coordinates, instrument, calibration and quality status.

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

The biocenose index shows the balance, without hiding the primary data

BIOCENTURY MONITORING

AIR

WATER

current value

natural range

Interconnected blocks

SOIL

BIOTA

change rate

Seasonal norm

Air · water · soil · Plants · animals · Sustainability · anthropogenic pressure

SUSTAINABILITY

PRESSURE

Level of risk

probable cause

Index - navigation for decisions. Evidence is provided by initial measurements and laboratory verification.

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

The point becomes the primary node of a large execution system

BIOCENTURY MONITORING

BIOCENOSIS

POINT

EQUILIBRIUM

ECO‑PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

Watching

Analyzing

defines actions

organizes execution

Digital double territory · warning · proven result

SFERA incorporates initiatives, scientific solutions and cooperation participants.

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

Three levels of equipment allow scaling the network

BIOCENTURY MONITORING

BASIC

EXPANDED

REFERENCE

Mass coverage

Problem areas

Support Scientific Center

Meteo · PM · CO₂ · Noise · Radiation · camera · soil

Gases · water probe · photo trap · bioacoustics · thermal imager · car test

Reference analyzers · Laboratory · eDNA · Spectrometry · UAVs

Network principle: mass point density + accuracy of reference stations.

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

Pilot in 90 days creates measurable territory contour

BIOCENTURY MONITORING

0–15

DESIGN

Boundaries of biocenosis, risks, indicators, installation sites.

16–45

DEVELOPING

Installation of points, communication, primary calibration, training.

46–75

BASIC LINE

Formation of natural ranges and digital passport.

76–90

VERIFICATION

Alarm test, mobile verification, report and scaling plan.

The result of the pilot: a working network, a passport of the territory, a response regulation and a confirmed methodology.

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

THE TERRITORY GETS THE OWN BODY OF FEELINGS

See

Heard

Measurable

Detects

Confirms

The biocenose point makes the ecological balance observable, manageable, and provable.

The next step is to select a pilot territory and fix the composition of the base line.

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO‑PPA · SPECZASHCHITA

Sources cited in presentation 3

  • The visual image was created by OpenAI on the author’s concept of a biocenous monitoring point.
  • The concept is designed for the system EQUILIBRIUM / ECO‑PPA.
  • EPA Water Sensors Toolbox; WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines; USGS Continuous Water-Quality Monitoring guidance.

Published files

ECO-PPA · Full published text

TYPES OF PPA: A systematic classification of power purchase agreements and Indigenous peoples’ PPAs

Source Status: Primary Document

Analytical and methodological document

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/vidy-ppa

Open on the site

PPA (Power Purchase Agreement) is a long-term contract for the purchase and sale of electrical energy between the manufacturer and the buyer. In project financing, PPA is one of the key contracts, as it consolidates the future cash flow of the project and distributes price, production, network, credit, regulatory and other risks.

1. Basic principles of classification PPA

the Unified Universal Classification PPA does not exist. One contract can simultaneously relate to several types. For example: corporate + Physical + off-site + Solar + pay-as-produced + fixed price + Term 20 years.

2. Types PPA by type of buyer

Utility PPA

The buyer is an energy sales, utility, regulated or state-owned energy company. A classic model for large generating projects and project financing.

Corporate PPA

The buyer is a private corporation or group of companies. It is used to fix the price, reduce the carbon footprint and ensure long-term supply.

Government PPA

The buyer or guarantor is a state, region, municipality or government agency.

Community PPA

The buyer is a municipality, energy cooperative, territorial community or association of residents.

Aggregated PPA

Several buyers combine demand through an aggregator, cooperative, or single contract.

Merchant / Partially Merchant PPA

Part of the volume is fixed at PPA, and part is sold on the market. Market risk remains partly with the manufacturer.

3. Types PPA by method of physical and financial supply

Physical PPA

Physical supply of electricity to the buyer through the electrical network.

Direct Wire PPA

The manufacturer is connected to the consumer by a direct line. Suitable for industrial facilities, microgrids and remote settlements.

On-site PPA

Generation is located directly on the buyer’s site — for example, a solar station on the roof or the territory of the enterprise.

Off-site PPA

The generating object is located remotely, and electricity is transmitted through a common network.

Sleeved PPA

Between the producer and the final buyer involves an energy supply or trading company that provides supply, balancing and settlement.

Virtual / Synthetic PPA

Physical delivery to the buyer may be absent. The parties enter into a financial agreement for the difference between the agreed and the market price.

Cross-border PPA

The manufacturer and the buyer are located in different countries. There are additional issues of cross-border transfer, currency, taxation and applicable law.

4. Types PPA on obligations of the parties

Take-and-pay

The buyer pays only for the actually received electricity.

Take-or-pay

The buyer is obliged to accept the agreed amount or pay it regardless of the actual consumption.

Pay-as-produced

The buyer accepts all the electricity actually produced. Most typical for wind and solar projects.

Baseload PPA

The supplier is obliged to provide a permanent supply profile. The missing volume can be bought in the market.

Pay-as-consumed

The volume of purchases is tied to the actual consumption of the buyer.

Availability-based PPA

Payment depends on the readiness of the facility for production and the availability of capacity.

Capacity PPA

Separately paid power, readiness or reserve, and electricity - by an independent formula.

5. Types PPA by price mechanism

Fixed-price PPA

Fixed price for the whole period or for individual periods.

Escalating PPA

The price is indexed annually by fixed percentage, inflation or other index.

Indexed PPA

The price depends on market indices, fuel cost, inflation, currency or other indicators.

Market-price PPA

The price is mainly determined by the current market value of electricity.

Floor-price PPA

A minimum price is set below which the calculations are not omitted.

Collar PPA

The price corridor with minimum and maximum boundaries is determined.

Contract for Difference (CfD)

The difference between the agreed price of performance and the market price is compensated by one of the parties.

Cost-plus PPA

The buyer compensates for the confirmed costs plus the agreed return.

Hybrid-price PPA

Combines fixed, market, indexed and other price components.

6. Types PPA by generation technology

Solar PPA

Solar power. Insolation, seasonality, degradation of modules and daily production profile are taken into account.

Wind PPA

Wind power. Significant wind resource, forecasting and restrictions of issuance.

Hydro PPA

Hydropower. Water quality, hydrology, ecological runoff and water rights are taken into account.

Biomass / Biogas PPA

Generation from biomass, biogas and agricultural waste.

Waste-to-Energy PPA

Energy from waste. It is often associated with contracts for the reception and disposal of waste.

Geothermal PPA

Geothermal generation. Geological and drilling risks are significant.

Thermal PPA

Gas, coal, diesel and other thermal stations.

Nuclear PPA

Long-term contracts for nuclear generation with increased requirements for safety, guarantees and regulation.

Storage / Battery PPA

Contracts related to energy storage, reserve, balancing and load transfer.

Hybrid PPA

Combines several technologies: solar + wind, generation + drive, etc.

Green Hydrogen PPA

Supply of renewable electricity for the production of green hydrogen with energy origin requirements.

7. Types PPA by project stage and deadline

Pre-construction PPA

It is concluded before construction and is used to attract project financing.

Operational PPA

This is for an already operating power plant.

Short-term PPA

A short-term contract is usually for several years.

Long-term PPA

Long-term contract for 10–30 years and more.

Bridge PPA

A transitional contract before connecting to the main system, concluding a permanent PPA or the beginning of another mechanism.

8. Special PPA

Microgrid PPA

For local and isolated power systems with generation, storage and distribution network.

Community Energy PPA

For collective energy supply to settlements, cooperatives and municipalities.

Public-Private PPA

PPA within a wider PPP structure, concession, BOT, BOO or other project model.

Social PPA

Agreement supplemented by social obligations: preferential tariffs, employment, access to energy and public investment.

Environmental / Impact-linked PPA

Payments or terms of the contract are related to environmental performance, emissions, ecosystem restoration or other effects.

Indigenous PPA

A special model for projects involving indigenous peoples, combining the energy compact with land, social, cultural and procedural guarantees.

9. PPA Indigenous peoples (Indigenous PPA / IP-PPA)

Indigenous PPA is not a single international legal form, but a special project architecture in which an indigenous people, community, tribal body, cooperative, trust or company owned by them is not only the recipient of compensation, but the owner, co-owner, manufacturer, buyer, land user, management participant or recipient of a long-term share of the economic result.

9.1. Main models Indigenous PPA

Indigenous-owned PPA

The community or company owns the entire project.

Indigenous majority-owned PPA

The indigenous people retain a controlling stake in the project company.

Indigenous minority equity PPA

The community receives a minority share, dividends and corporate rights.

Joint Venture PPA

A joint project of the community, the energy company and investors.

Community Offtake PPA

The community acts as a buyer of electricity for settlements and public facilities.

Microgrid Indigenous PPA

Local microgrid for remote territory with RES, storage and backup generation.

Direct-wire Indigenous PPA

Direct supply of energy to community facilities or to a partner industrial consumer.

Host Community PPA

The project of an outside investor is located on the territory of the community, and the rights and benefits of the community are fixed contractually.

Benefit-sharing PPA

Some of the proceeds or payments are automatically sent to a public, environmental or generational fund.

Royalty-linked PPA

The community receives royalties for each MW·h or a percentage of revenue.

Preferential Tariff PPA

A preferential or social price for electricity is set for the community.

Aggregated Indigenous PPA

Several communities combine consumption, generation, or investment into a single entity.

Indigenous Corporate PPA

The indigenous company sells electricity to an external corporate buyer.

Sovereign / Tribal PPA

The contract is concluded with a recognized body of tribal or traditional self-government.

Indigenous Green Attributes PPA

Together with electricity, the rights to environmental attributes, certificates and emission reduction results are distributed.

9.2. Contractual architecture Indigenous PPA

  • The FPIC Protocol is a free, prior and informed consent protocol.
  • An Indigenous Peoples Agreement is a framework agreement with a community or people.
  • The Power Purchase Agreement is a power purchase agreement.
  • Land Use Agreement - Land Use Agreement and Rights of Use.
  • A benefit sharing agreement is a benefit sharing agreement.
  • Shareholders/Equity Agreement is a community-shared agreement.
  • Environmental and Social Management Plan: Environmental and Social Responsibility.
  • The Cultural Heritage Agreement protects sacred sites, heritage and traditional knowledge.
  • Employment and Procurement Agreement - Local employment, training and procurement.
  • Grievance and Dispute Resolution Agreement: Mechanisms for complaints and dispute resolution.

9.3. Key principles IP-PPA

  • Recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples to territory and traditional environmental management.
  • Representative authority and transparency of decision-making.
  • Free, prior and informed participation until irreversible decisions are made.
  • Participation in the ownership and management of the project.
  • Minimum guaranteed income and long-term benefit sharing.
  • Royalties, dividends, preferential energy and social investments.
  • Maintain access to traditional territories and natural resources.
  • Protection of cultural and spiritual heritage.
  • Independent environmental and social monitoring.
  • Public or community-accessible production and payment accounting.
  • Restrictions on the transfer of the project to third parties without agreed procedures.
  • Mandatory reclamation and financial support for the decommissioning of the facility.

10. Recommended classification PPA for system ECO-PPA

For practical work, it is advisable to use a multidimensional classification, where each project receives its own passport PPA at seven coordinates:

1. Who's the buyer?

2. How is the delivery carried out?

3. How are large risks distributed?

4. How is the price formed?

5. What technology is used?

6. At what stage and time is the contract concluded?

7. What special social, environmental, territorial or international conditions apply?

11. Matrix types PPA

CriterionMain typesMain riskTypical application
BuyerUtility, Corporate, Government, Community, AggregatedCreditworthiness of the buyerLarge generation, industry, municipalities
DeliveryPhysical, Direct Wire, On-site, Off-site, Sleeved, VirtualNetwork, Balancing, BasisCorporate and infrastructure projects
VolumeTake-or-pay, Take-and-pay, Pay-as-produced, BaseloadVolume and profile of generationRenewables and basic generation
PriceFixed, Indexed, Floor, Collar, CfD, MarketMarket PriceHedging and project financing
TechnologySolar, Wind, Hydro, Biomass, Thermal, Storage, HybridResource and technologySpecialized energy projects
Social contourCommunity, Social, Indigenous PPASocial License and Territory RightsRemote areas, indigenous peoples, community projects

12. Result

PPA It should not be considered as one type of contract, but as a designer of design architecture. Properly structured PPA It brings together commercial contracts, network supply rules, pricing mechanisms, risk allocation and, where appropriate, social, environmental, land and international obligations. For ECO-PPA The Hybrid is particularly promising PPA, Community PPA, Social PPA, Microgrid PPA and Indigenous PPA, because they link energy production to measurable social and environmental outcomes.

Other published edition: TYPES PPA Types_PPA_presentation.pptx · web text +

System classification of electricity contracts and PPA indigenous peoples

PPA as a designer of design architecture: energy • price • Risks • Law • Territory • Impact

What is PPA?

Power Purchase Agreement

Function for the project

Funding function

Long-term contract between the producer and the buyer of electricity. Generates predictable cash flow and distributes key project risks.

Fixes volume, price, time, delivery rules, liability, balancing, buyer credit risk and termination conditions.

The high-quality PPA increases the project’s bankability and allows attracting long-term debt and project financing.

PPA - multi-dimensional design

Delivery

Volume

A single contract can be of several types at the same time.

Buyer

Price

PPA

Social contour

Technology

Timeframe

Types PPA by type of buyer

Utility PPA

Corporate PPA

Government PPA

Power supply, utility or state-owned energy company.

A corporation or group of companies.

State, region, municipality, budgetary institution.

Community PPA

Aggregated PPA

Merchant / Hybrid Merchant

Municipality, cooperative, territorial community.

Several buyers combine demand through an aggregator.

Part of the volume — on PPA, part — on the market.

Types PPA by delivery method

Physical

Direct Wire

Physical delivery via network

Direct line manufacturer → user

On-site

Off-site

Generation on the buyer's site

Remote generation through a common network

Sleeved

Virtual / Synthetic

Delivery through an energy sales intermediary

Financial agreement without mandatory physical delivery

Cross-border

Cross-border transfers between States

Types PPA by obligations and volume

• Take-and-pay — payment of the actually received energy

• Take-or-pay — buyer accepts volume or pays for it

• Pay-as-produced — buyer accepts all actual production

• Baseload PPA — Supplier Provides Permanent Delivery Profile

• Pay-as-consumed — volume tied to actual consumption

• Availability-based — availability and availability fees

• Capacity PPA - separate power charge / reserve

Views PPA by price

Fixed

Escalating

Indexed

Fixed price

Planned indexing

Binding to index / fuel / currency

Market

Floor

Collar

Market Price

Minimum price

The Price Corridor

CfD

Cost-plus

Hybrid-price

Contract for Difference

Costs + yield

Combination of mechanisms

Types PPA by technology

Solar

Wind

Hydro

Biomass / Biogas

Waste-to-Energy

Geothermal

Thermal

Nuclear

Storage / Battery

Hybrid

Green Hydrogen

PPA by project stage and deadline

Pre-construction Before construction

Operational Operating Object

Short Term Short Term

Long-term 10–30 years and more

Bridge Transitional

Special models PPA

Microgrid PPA

Community Energy PPA

Local and Isolated Power Systems

Collective energy supply to communities

Public-Private PPA

Social PPA

As part of PPP, concession, BOT / BOO

Social tariffs, employment and access to energy

Impact-linked PPA

Indigenous PPA

Environmental and social relations KPI

Indigenous rights + energy + benefits

Indigenous PPA / IP-PPA

PPA indigenous peoples — extended architecture of the energy project

IP‑PPA = Energy PPA + Participation + Land + Benefits + Culture + Ecology

• Indigenous people may be the owner, co-owner, producer, purchaser or host community

• The key principle is not one-time compensation, but long-term participation in the economic result

• Sam PPA does not replace land, social, cultural and procedural agreements

Main Models Indigenous PPA

Indigenous-owned

Majority-owned

Minority equity

Joint Venture

Community Offtake

Microgrid Indigenous

Direct-wire Indigenous

Host Community

Benefit-sharing

Royalty-linked

Preferential Tariff

Aggregated Indigenous

Indigenous Corporate

Sovereign / Tribal

Green Attributes

Contractual architecture IP-PPA

FPIC Protocol

Indigenous Peoples Agreement

Power Purchase Agreement

Land Use Agreement

Benefit Sharing Agreement

Equity / Shareholders Agreement

Environmental & Social Plan

Cultural Heritage Agreement

Employment & Procurement

Grievance & Dispute Resolution

Key principles IP-PPA

• Recognition of rights to territory and traditional environmental management

• Credentials and transparency of decision-making

• Prior and informed participation until irreversible decisions

• Ownership and management

• Minimum guaranteed income + Dividends / Royalties

• Preferential energy and local employment

• Protection of cultural heritage and traditional economy

• Independent environmental and social monitoring

• Transparency of production and payments

• Reclamation and financial support for the closure of the project

Recommended logic for ECO-PPA

Each project receives its own passport PPA at seven coordinates

Buyer

Delivery

Volume

Price

Technology

Timeframe

Socio-ecological contour

Promising for ECO-PPA models: Hybrid • Community • Social • Microgrid • Indigenous PPA

Matrix of choice PPA

CriterionMain typesKey riskApplication
BuyerUtility / Corporate / CommunityCreditworthinessLarge Generation / Industry
DeliveryPhysical / Direct / VirtualNetworking and BalancingNetwork and corporate projects
VolumeTake-or-pay / Pay-as-producedGenerating ProfileRES / basic generation
PriceFixed / Indexed / CfD / CollarMarket PriceHedging / project finance
TechnologySolar / Wind / Hydro / HybridResource / TechnologySpecialized projects
Social contourCommunity / Social / IndigenousRights of TerritoryRemote areas / communities

Conclusion

PPA — not one contract, but a system of risk and value distribution

• Basic PPA sets the commercial model of the energy project

• Expanded PPA add networking, financial, social and environmental mechanisms

• Indigenous PPA transforms the local community from an object of compensation into a long-term participant of the project

• ECO‑PPA can use a modular constructor PPA for different territories, technologies and groups of participants

Published files

ECO-PPA · Full published text

ECO-PPA — National Security Architecture

Source Status: Primary Document

Unified system of threat prevention, resource mobilization, execution and confirmation of results

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/eco-ppa-arkhitektura-natsionalnoy-bezopasnosti

Open on the site
ECO-PPAMechanism for mobilizing public and private resources to prevent threats.
EQUILIBRIUMMonitoring, forecasting and control system.
RF CCIBusiness and industrial contour.
ASIOutline of initiatives and scaling.
SPECZASHCHITACo-operative organization of execution.
Security CouncilStrategic Center for Threat Assessment and Interagency Coordination.

1. Status and purpose of the document

This concept is a project proposal for interdepartmental and business discussion. It does not establish the powers of state bodies, does not confirm their participation and does not replace regulatory legal acts, state programs, budget planning procedures, expertise and procurement.

The purpose of the document is to define an agreed model in which environmental, energy, resource, technological and territorial threats are transformed into executable projects with the results established by the owners, sources of resources, performance indicators and control mechanisms.

2. Mission and target status

The mission of the system is to ensure the transition from a fragmented response to consequences to full-cycle risk management: from early detection and forecasting to eliminating the causes of the threat and replicating the confirmed solution.

3. Control object

  • environmental and climatic risks of the territories;
  • sustainability of energy supply and critical infrastructure;
  • scarcity or degradation of water, soils, forests and bioresources;
  • accumulated environmental damage and hazardous waste;
  • technological dependence and shortage of domestic equipment;
  • economic stability of enterprises and strongholds;
  • The impact of environmental conditions on health, employment and quality of life.

4. Principles of the system

Prevention: Priority of prevention over subsequent compensation.

Evidence: Decisions are made on the basis of baseline data, scenario forecast and measurable indicators.

Division of roles: strategic management, expertise, financing, execution and control do not mix.

Technological Sovereignty: The Priority of Reproducible Russian Technologies and Critically Independent Supply Chains.

Mixed resource provision: budget and private resources are combined only with a transparent distribution of obligations and risks.

Territorial applicability: the project is formed from the actual request of the territory, and not from an abstract proposal of technology.

Scalability: A successful pilot is transformed into a typical package, standard, or regional practice.

5. Architecture of participants

The system is built as six complementary contours. None of them replaces the other: the strategic center does not perform economic functions, the analytical platform does not make power decisions, and the execution operator does not determine state priorities.

ParticipantContourMain FunctionLimit of responsibility
the Russian Security CouncilStrategicAssessment of systemic threats; interdepartmental coordination; preparation of proposals to the President of the Russian Federation; control over the implementation of decisions.It does not act as an investor, economic operator or party to commercial contracts.
EQUILIBRIUMAnalyticalThreat passports; scenario forecast; resource and project map; monitoring indicators; preparation of analytical materials.It does not replace official statistics and state information systems; access regimes are separated.
ECO-PPAProject-contractualFixing goals, participants, commitments, financing, supplies, risks, timing, indicators and verification procedures.Each agreement is subject to legal, financial, technological and environmental expertise.
RF CCIBusiness and IndustrialCollection of business requests; search for production partners; industrial cooperation; expertise; registers of competences; international business relations.The Chamber does not guarantee profitability and does not automatically respond to the obligations of the participants.
ASIInitiativeSearch for leaders and solutions; development of initiatives; regional integration; removal of systemic barriers; dissemination of best practices.The inclusion of ASI is expected only after agreeing on the format and criteria for participation.
SPECZASHCHITACooperative and ExecutiveFormation of cooperation; staffing of project teams; organization of suppliers and contractors; support of implementation.The powers and responsibilities are fixed by separate contracts for each project.

6. End-to-end threat management cycle

  1. Identification: fixing the source of the threat, the territory, the affected population and critical infrastructure.
  2. Assessment and forecast: scenario of inaction, probability, scale of damage, interregional consequences.
  3. Solution formation: selection of technologies and organizational measures, maturity and applicability testing.
  4. Structuring ECO-PPA: participants, commitments, sources of resources, risks, timelines, indicators and benchmarks.
  5. Execution: design, financing, supply, construction, implementation, training and commissioning.
  6. Monitoring and verification: comparison of the result with the baseline, independent confirmation and management report.
  7. Scaling: Typing documentation, removing barriers, including in regional or industry programs.

7. ECO-PPA as a resource mobilization mechanism

ECO-PPA is proposed to be defined as a comprehensive environmental design and partnership agreement. In energy projects, it can include the classic Power Purchase Agreement, a long-term energy supply contract. In complex projects, the agreement covers the restoration of the natural environment, resource efficiency, local infrastructure and technological modernization.

7.1. Mandatory structure ECO-PPA

  • Threat passport and baseline;
  • target state and measurable indicators of risk reduction;
  • the composition of the participants and the matrix of powers;
  • technological and production model;
  • sources of financing and return on investment;
  • distribution of risks, guarantees and responsibilities;
  • calendar plan and control points;
  • monitoring, data disclosure and independent verification;
  • conditions of operation, scaling and exit of participants.

7.2. Sources of resources

Public outline: Federal and regional programs; budget investments; subsidies; PPPs and concessions - in cases stipulated by law.

Corporate contour: Own funds of enterprises; long-term demand; off-take contracts; energy service models.

Financial contour: Banking and project financing; leasing; bond instruments; CFA - only in permissible legal models.

Cooperative Outline: Mutual and other cooperative mechanisms within the law and with transparent disclosure of risks.

Scientific and technological contour: R&D results, testing capacities, intellectual property, engineering and personnel competencies.

8. EQUILIBRIUM: Monitoring, forecasting and control

EQUILIBRIUM forms a unified analytical view of the state of the territory and the progress of projects. The platform should be built on the principle of separate information contours: open, service and limited access.

FunctionContents
ObservationCollection of initial and current indicators; digital passports of territories and objects.
ForecastingThreat scenarios; assessment of the consequences of inaction; prioritization of measures.
Project controlStatuses ECO-PPA, resources, terms, deviations, responsible, control points.
PerformanceComparison of the baseline and the actual effect; the cost of the prevented damage.
Management reportingAnalytical panels and reports for an appropriate level of decision-making.

9. The Responsibility Matrix

ProcessOwner of the resultParticipantsWithdrawal
Identification of strategic threatsSecurity Council/authorized bodiesFederal agencies, regions, scienceList of priorities and instructions
Gathering initiatives and technologiesASIRF CCI, regions, scientific organizationsPortfolio of pre-selected solutions
Industrial cooperationRF CCISPECZASHCHITA, enterprises, banksConsortium and Supply Chain
Structuring the projectOperator ECO-PPACustomer, investor, lawyers, expertsSigned package of agreements
Practical executionSPECZASHCHITA / Designated operatorContractors, suppliers, territoryCreated and entered object
MonitoringEQUILIBRIUM / data ownersControl bodies, operator, territoryCurrent indicators and warnings
VerificationIndependent Qualified PartyScience, CCI, profile bodiesConclusion on the outcome
ScalingASI and relevant bodiesCCI, regions, operator ECO-PPAModel package and replication program

10. System of indicators

  • reducing the likelihood and scale of damage;
  • reliability of energy supply and infrastructure;
  • the amount of emissions, discharges and waste prevented;
  • restored water, soils, forests and ecosystems;
  • share of domestic technologies and equipment;
  • the amount of extrabudgetary resources attracted;
  • created jobs and trained specialists;
  • cost of life cycle and prevented damage;
  • percentage of indicators confirmed by independent verification;
  • The number of countries that have implemented the model solution.

11. Pilot project

The recommended start is one evidence-based territorial pilot or a portfolio of 5–7 interconnected projects. For the Syzran-Rameno-Smolkino link, a separate justification of the choice is required before the proposal is sent to state bodies: a threat passport, initial data, a list of objects, stakeholders, the legal status of sites and a preliminary economy.

PeriodKey result
0–3 monthsThreat passport; working group; choice of territory; preliminary register of technologies; selection criteria.
4–6 monthsFeasibility study; basic measurements; model ECO-PPA; legal and financial expertise; consortium composition.
7–12 monthsFinancing; design; first stage of implementation; launch of protected monitoring.
13–24 monthsOperational data; independent verification; assessment of prevented damage; regulatory proposals.
25–36 monthsModel package; interregional scaling; portfolio of following projects.

12. Solutions required for launch

  1. approve the status of the initiative concept and the owner of the preparation of materials;
  2. to form an inter-sectoral working group;
  3. select one priority category of threats and pilot territory;
  4. prepare a passport of threat and a baseline;
  5. to develop a standard package ECO-PPA and a verification regulation;
  6. identify the pilot operator, sources of resources and data owners;
  7. conduct legal, technological, financial and information expertise;
  8. After confirmation of the pilot, prepare proposals for scaling.

13. Proposed wording of the initiative

14. Implementation risks and conditions of admissibility

RiskManagement Condition
SubstitutionAll roles of state bodies are designated as proposals before official approval.
Unproven effectFunding is tied to the baseline, calculation methodology and verifiable indicators.
Conflict of interestThe contractor should not single-handedly confirm its own result.
Opaque fund-raisingEach financial instrument undergoes legal and risk expertise; profitability is not guaranteed by the CCI, ASI or government agencies.
Information VulnerabilityData about critical infrastructure is placed only in a protected circuit.
Technological dependenceLocalization, maintainability, components, software and staffing are evaluated.

15. Final model

The Security Council sets a strategic framework for threat assessment and inter-agency coordination. EQUILIBRIUM provides surveillance, forecasting and monitoring. ASI forms a stream of initiatives and a mechanism for scaling them. The RF CCI combines business demand, industry, expertise and cooperation. ECO-PPA turns the solution into a system of enforceable obligations and resource support. SPECZASHCHITA organizes cooperative execution.

Sources and normative guidelines

  • National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation, Presidential Decree of the Russian Federation 02.07.2021 № 400
  • Doctrine of Energy Security of the Russian Federation, Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 13.05.2019 № 216
  • Interdepartmental commissions of the Security Council of the Russian Federation
  • Official information on the activities of the RF CCI
  • Agency for Strategic Initiatives initiatives

Other published edition: ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY Arkhitektura_natsionalnoy_bezopasnosti_ECO-PPA.pptx · web text +

Unified system of threat prevention, resource mobilization and result control

THREAT

FORECAST

DECISION

RESULT

ECO-PPA • EQUILIBRIUM • State • Business • Co-operation

18 August 2026

Security begins before the crisis

ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

REACTIVE MODEL

PREVENTIVE MODEL ECO-PPA

Consequences

Observation

Forecast

Accident • Damage • Compensation • Recovery

Mobilization

Implementation

Monitoring

The goal is to reduce the likelihood and scale of damage, not just pay for its consequences.

Six circuits form one control system

ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

SECURITY COUNCIL

EQUILIBRIUM

ASI

ECO-PPA

observation • forecast • control

• Scaling

Resource mobilization

RF CCI

SPECZASHCHITA

Business • Industrial Outline

Co-operative Organization

Strategy → analytics → initiative → resources → execution → confirmed result

Each circuit has its own function and boundary of responsibility

ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

PARTICIPANTCONTOURMAIN FUNCTIONBORDER
Security CouncilStrategyThreat assessment and inter-agency coordinationNot an economic operator
EQUILIBRIUMAnalysisThreat passports, forecasts, monitoringDoes not replace official GIS
ECO-PPAAgreementGoals, commitments, resources, risks, indicatorsPassing a comprehensive examination
RF CCIIndustryBusiness request, cooperation, expertiseDoes not guarantee profitability
ASIInitiativesSearch for solutions, regions, scalingParticipation after approval
SPECZASHCHITAImplementationTeams, suppliers, contractorsLiability under contracts

The system works with interconnected threats, not with individual departmental tasks

ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

ENVIRONMENT

Air • Water • Soil • Waste • Ecosystem

ENERGY

Reliability of supply • wear • reserving

RESOURCES

water • raw materials • bioresources • secondary materials

TECHNOLOGIES

localization • equipment • by • competences

ECONOMY

Sustainability of enterprises • investments • supply chain

TERRITORIES AND PEOPLE

Infrastructure • Employment • Health • Quality of Life

The threat goes through a full cycle - from fixation to scaling the solution

ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

ANNOUNCEMENT

FORECAST

SOLUTION SELECTION

ECO-PPA

EXECUTION

VERIFICATION

MASSHTAB

THREATS PASSPORT

EXECUTIVE COMMITMENTS

CONFIRMED RISK REDUCTION

ECO-PPA turns a strategic task into an executable design

ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

PURPOSE AND BASIC LINE

What we change and how we measure threat reduction

ECO-PPA

ATTENDANCE AND COMMITMENTS

Who is responsible for the result, timing and resources

Integrated Environmental Design and Partnership Agreement

FINANCING AND RISKS

From which flows capital returns and who carries the risk

MONITORING AND VERIFICATION

What evidence supports the actual effect

Energy projects may include a Power Purchase Agreement

EXPLOITATION AND MASSTAB

How the solution works the entire life cycle

EQUILIBRIUM combines data, forecast and management control

ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

totals • results • public reports

OPEN CONTOUR

technical data • status of objects • design risks

SERVICE CONTOUR

critical infrastructure • vulnerabilities • restricted access

PROTECTED CONTOUR

OBSERVATION

→ FORECAST

→ PRIORITIZATION

→ RESULT CONTROL

Each stage has an owner of the result and a verifiable exit

ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

PROCESSOWNERKEY EXIT
Identification of threatsSecurity Council/authorized bodiesPriorities and assignments
Collection of initiativesASIPortfolio of solutions
Industrial cooperationRF CCIConsortium and Supply Chain
StructuringOperator ECO-PPAPackage of agreements
ImplementationSPECZASHCHITA / Designated operatorCreated object
MonitoringEQUILIBRIUM / data ownersIndicators and warnings
VerificationThe Independent PartyConclusion on the result
ScalingASI and relevant bodiesDefault package

The pilot for 36 months should prove not an idea, but a reduction in risk

ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

7–12

13–24

25–36

DIAGNOSTICS

STRUCTURE

STARTING

VERIFICATION

MASSHTAB

passport threats • working group • territory

Feasibility Study • basic measurements • Model ECO-PPA

financing • design • first stage

operational data • independent verification

standard package • interregional portfolio

CRITERIUM OF SUCCESS: Confirmed reduction of specific threat + reproducible solution package

Eight management decisions are required to start

ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY

PREPARATION

START-UP AND MASSTAB

Identify the owner of the materials

Develop standard package ECO-PPA

Create a cross-sectoral working group

Appoint an operator and data owners

Select Threat and Pilot Area

Carry out four types of examination

Prepare a threat passport and a base line

After the pilot approve the scaling model

SOLUTION: to form a pilot mechanism ECO-PPA and determine the verification territory

Warning threat is the main result of the system

FINAL ARCHITECTURE

SECURITY COUNCIL

EQUILIBRIUM

ECO-PPA

Strategy and coordination

Forecasting and monitoring

resources and commitments

CCI • ASI • SPECZASHCHITA

Initiatives • Industry • Execution • Scale

PROTECTIVE TERRITORY • SUSTAINABLE LIFESUP • CONFIRMATIVE RESULT

Sources cited in presentation 7

  • User-provided ECO-PPA concept
  • https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/47046
  • [/Sources]
  • https://www.scrf.gov.ru/security/economic/energy_doc/
  • https://www.scrf.gov.ru/council/commission/
  • https://tpprf.ru/ru/about/
  • https://asi.ru/initiatives/

Published files

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Finance, funds and analytics

Resources on accounting, balances, intangible assets, funds and financial models. The authors’ texts and their public summaries are reproduced, including existing explanations of the proposals’ status.

Materials: 13 · with full text: 13 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Analytics · Full published text

Analysis of the Balance of Russia’s State Corporations over 30 Years

Source Status: Primary Document

An overview of the development of the state corporate sector in 1996–2025 and a proposal to move towards a unified national balance across corporations.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/analiz-balansa-goskorporatsii-1996-2025

Open on the site

From property consolidation to a system of managed reproduction of capital, technologies, personnel and territories

1. Executive summary

Over the 30-year horizon, the state corporate sector of Russia has gone from fragmented management of strategic assets to large integrated contours that can simultaneously solve production, infrastructure, defense, financial and technological problems.

The form “state corporation” was enshrined in law in 1999. The main wave of institutional formation occurred in 2003–2009 years, and the subsequent period was characterized by asset consolidation, import substitution, growth of investment role and transition to technological sovereignty.

The key conclusion: further growth of the effect requires not an increase in the number of state corporations, but a transition from isolated corporate strategies to a single inter-corporate balance of the country: resources → Technology → Personnel → Power → Infrastructure → Markets → social result → environmental effect → feedback.

2. Periodization 1996–2025

PeriodOutline StatusMain resultThe main imbalance
1996–2005PreparatoryLegal framework, preservation of critical assets, the first specialized institutionsGap between government objectives, assets and investment cycle
2006–2014ConsolidationCreation of large integrated corporations, collection of industry chains, restoration of manageabilityStrong vertical with weak inter-industry synchronization
2015–2021Technological adaptationImport substitution, digitalization, growth of project financing and new businessesInsufficient speed of technology transfer and civil diversification
2022–2025Mobilization and investmentAcceleration of release, localization of critical chains, sharp growth of capital programsHigh load on personnel, equipment, working capital and priority system

3. Actual anchors of the current state

  • Rostec: consolidated revenue for 2024 year — 3,61 trillion RUB; net profit — 131,5 billion RUB; investments — 676 billion RUB; civil revenue - about 1,1 trillion RUB, the share of civil products — 30,7%. [1]
  • ROSATOM: IFRS revenue for 2024 year — 3 087,7 billion RUB; adjusted free cash flow — 445,4 billion RUB; intangible assets — 349,5 billion Rub. [2]
  • Rosatom provides about 19% Energy balance of Russia; in 2024 the Nuclear Power Plant 215,5 billion KW·h. [2][3]
  • VEB.RF continues to perform the function of a state development corporation and publishes annual and issuer reports; its effect as a project multiplier is important for the national balance sheet, and not only its own profit. [4]
  • The sector is heterogeneous: it includes industrial and technological corporations, development institutions, insurance/liquidation institutions and state-owned infrastructure companies; they cannot be correctly compared only by profit.

4. What exactly should be considered the “balance of state corporations”

It is proposed to move from the accounting view to 9-contour state balance:

  • 1. Financial - assets, debt, cash flow, dividends, budget support, the cost of capital.
  • 2. Production - capacity, loading, performance, critical equipment, repair cycle.
  • 3. Technological - R&D, patents, NMA, localization level, technological readiness, import dependence.
  • 4. Personnel - number, lack of competencies, engineering schools, productivity, age structure.
  • 5. Material - raw materials, rare and rare earth materials, ceramics, synthetic crystals, composites, semiconductor materials.
  • 6. Infrastructure - energy, transport, communications, computing, logistics, housing and areas of presence.
  • 7. Territorial - the effect on regions, monotowns, agglomerations, Siberia, the Far East, the Arctic.
  • 8. Ecological - resource efficiency, waste, water, air, soil, ecosystem restoration.
  • 9. Meaningful / strategic - compliance with national goals, sovereignty, demography, quality of life and long-term civilization project.

5. Diagnostics 30-year balance

ContourAchievedLimitationConclusion
SovereigntyCritical Industry Cores Preserved and CollectedSome of the chains remain dependent on machines, electronics, materials and softwareTransition to end-to-end maps of technological independence
CapitalLarge investment centers have been establishedCapital is often optimized within a corporation, rather than across industriesUnified balance of capital programs
InnovationsStrong R&D Contours FormedLong way from laboratory to seriesUnified technology register and rapid replication mechanism
Civic diversificationGrowth of civil areas and new businessesUnevenness in corporations and cyclical dependence on state ordersDual technology portfolio and guaranteed domestic demand
WorkforceEngineering Schools PreservedLack of staff and corporate competition with each otherNational balance of personnel and inter-corporate academies
TerritoriesCorporations support cities of presenceThe effect is poorly combined into a single regional balanceCorporate programs = part of master plans of regions
DataThere is a developed corporate reportingNo unified operational inter-corporate balance sheetFederal Data Model + Digital Balance Doppelganger

6. Exits to the New Order

The New Order is a transition from managing individual legal entities to constructing integrated national reproduction frameworks. The key object of management is not the corporation in isolation, but the chain “need → resource → technology → production → infrastructure → person → territory → result”.

1. Unified state balance of state corporations. Combine strategies, investment programs, R&D, procurement, personnel, infrastructure and territorial effects into one system of indicators.

2. Inter-corporate technology chains. Create a register of critical dependencies and mutual supplies: materials, machine tools, microelectronics, software, energy, logistics.

3. National outline of materials science. Combine metals, ceramics, synthetic crystals, composites and functional materials with real corporate orders and academic science.

4. Computational grid. General high-performance computing, engineering modeling, AI, digital twins and federated databases.

5. The system of funds and long capital. Divide working, investment, technological, infrastructure, personnel and reserve capital; evaluate the fund by the effect created.

6. production consortia. Instead of duplicating capacities, joint use of test centers, polygons, laboratories, supercomputers and pilot industries.

7. Balance of territories. Link corporate programs to master plans of cities and regions, infrastructure, housing, education, ecology and demography.

8. Bicentennial standard. Each major project should consider not only the financial NPV, but also the balance of water, air, soil, biodiversity, waste and environmental health.

9. The feedback loop. Real-time performance: deviation → reason → solution → resource → Responsible → Term → Confirmed effect.

7. The architecture of the state metabalance

National objectives and security

↓ 19 industry/functional balance sheets

↓ State Corporations and State Companies

↓ Development institutions and banks

↓ Academic and applied science

↓ Regions and cities of presence

↓ Suppliers and SMEs

↓ Digital monitoring system

↓ Contour of decisions of the Government of the Russian Federation

8. Road map 2026–2030

StageTimeframeResultReadiness criteria
I. Inventory0–6 monthsUnified passport of assets, projects, technologies and competenciesComparable data for key corporations
II. Balancing6–12 monthsMatrix of deficits/surpluses and inter-corporate relationshipsCritical gaps and duplications identified
III. Pilots12–24 months3–5 through chains: materials, energy, transport, computing, ecologyConfirmed economic and technological effect
IV. Scaling2028–2030The Federal Metabalance SystemInvestment decisions and state programs are based on single balances

9. New Order KPI System

  • The share of critical chains with proven technological independence.
  • The coefficient of inter-corporate use of production and scientific capacities.
  • The proportion of investments that have been evaluated by an intersectoral multiplier.
  • Term "R&D → prototype → series".
  • Share of domestic materials, equipment, software and computing infrastructure.
  • Productivity and availability of key engineering competencies.
  • Regional effect: employment, income, infrastructure, quality of the urban environment.
  • Environmental impact on the unit of value added created.
  • Percentage of indicators available in quick feedback mode.

10. Final conclusion

The main result of 30 years: Russia has formed large state corporate cores capable of holding strategic industries and concentrating resources.

The main task of the next cycle is to turn a collection of strong corporations into a connected system of national reproduction. The New Order begins where the corporate balance becomes part of the country’s balance, and investment decisions take capital, technology, materials, personnel, territory, ecology and long-term sovereignty into account together.

Sources and methodological notes

[1] GC "Rostec". Results of work for 2024 Year, Message from 10.06.2025: Consolidated revenue 3,61 trillion RUB, net profit 131,5 billion Rubles, investments 676 billion RUB, the share of civil products 30,7%.

[2] GC "Rosatom". Strategic report for 2024 year: IFRS revenue 3 087,7 billion RUB, adjusted free cash flow 445,4 billion rub., NMA 349,5 billion rub.

[3] GC "Rosatom". Public Reporting: Nuclear Power Generation in 2024 the Year 215,5 billion KW·h; the share of nuclear energy in the energy balance of Russia 19%.

[4] VEB.RF. Section of disclosure and reports of the issuer for 2024–2025 years.

[5] Federal Law of 12.01.1996 № 7-FZ About non-profit organizations, article 7.1 "State Corporation" is introduced by the Federal Law of 08.07.1999 № 140-FZ.

Methodology: Integral indices and target scores in charts are author's analytical scale for comparing institutional maturity; they are not official government statistics. The financial performance of different corporations is not aggregated mechanically due to differences in objectives, reporting standards, consolidation and legal form.

Other published edition: RUSSIA Russia_Analysis_Balance_State Corporations_30_years_New_Conclusion.pptx · web text +

Analysis of the balance of state corporations for 30 years

1996–2025 • Exits to the New Order

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 1

30 years: from asset management to reproduction management

The form of the state corporation is fixed in the legislation since 1999; 1996–1998 is the base stage.

1996–2005

Legal and institutional framework. Preservation of critical assets. The gap between property, investment and long government tasks.

2006–2014

Consolidation of industry chains. Increased manageability. The emergence of powerful state corporate cores.

2015–2021

Import substitution, digitalization, new businesses, project financing. Enhancing the technological role.

2022–2025

Mobilization and investment cycle: output growth, localization, capacity expansion. The main deficit is personnel, equipment and synchronization.

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 2

Actual anchors: 2024

Indicators are used as reference points rather than as mechanically summable "total sector profits".

GROWTH

Revenue 3,61 trillion rub. • net profit 131,5 billion • investments 676 billion • Civil Revenue ≈1,1 trillion • Percentage of civilian products 30,7%.

ROSATOM

Revenues under IFRS 3 087,7 billion rub. • adjusted free cash flow 445,4 billion • NMA 349,5 billion rub.

ENERGY EFFECT

Nuclear Power - Order 19% Energy balance of the Russian Federation; production of nuclear power 2024 the Year — 215,5 billion KW·h.

DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTES

VEB.RF, Avtodor, FRT and other institutions need to be evaluated by project multiplier, infrastructure and social effect, and not only by net profit.

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 3

Balance of state corporations = 9 interconnected contours

Finance

assets • debt • stream

Production

Power • Load

Technology

R&D • NMA • localization

Workforce

Competency • Performance

Materials

Metals • Ceramics • Crystals

Infrastructure

Energy • Transport • Computing

Territories

cities • regions • Arctic

Ecology

water • air • soil

Strategy

Sovereignty • Quality of Life

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 4

Strengths and systemic gaps

• Critical industry cores and strategic assets are collected.

• Corporations are able to concentrate investments and quickly scale output.

• Engineering schools, testing bases and technological competences are preserved.

• New civil and export businesses have emerged.

• Investment programs are optimized primarily within corporations.

• There is duplication of R&D, capacity, procurement and infrastructure.

• Deficit of inter-corporate personnel and material balance.

• There is no single operational model "goal" → resource → solution → effect".

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 5

Exit to the New Order

No more corporations, no more connections between them.

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 6

9 routes into the New Order

• 1. Unified state metabalance

• 2. Inter-corporate technological chains

• 3. National outline of materials science

• 4. Computational Grid

• 5. System of funds and long capital

• 6. Production consortia

• 7. Balance of territories and master plans

• 8. Bicentennial Project Standard

• 9. The contour of operational feedback

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 7

The Metabalance Architecture of Russia

NATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND SECURITY

19 RELATED BALANCES

GOVERNMENT • GOSCOMPANY • DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTES

SCIENCE • REGIONS • SUPPLIERS • CARDS • DATA

DIGITAL DOUBLE OF THE BALANCE AND COMMUNICATION

CONTOUR OF DECISIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF RUSSIA

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 8

Road map 2026–2030

0–6 Months. • Inventory

Passports of assets, projects, technologies, personnel.

6–12 Months. • Balancing

Deficits, duplication, critical dependencies.

12–24 Months. • Pilots

Materials, energy, transport, computing, ecology.

2028–2030 • Scaling

Metabalance becomes the basis of investments and state programs.

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 9

New Order KPI

• Technological independence of critical chains

• Term of R&D → Series

• Use of general scientific and production facilities

• Share of domestic materials, equipment and software

• Productivity and staffing

• Regional infrastructure effect

• Environmental effect on value added

• Proportion of indicators with prompt feedback

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 10

The main transition

The sum of strong state corporations should become a linked system of national reproduction.

New Order: capital + technologies + materials + personnel + territories + ecology + data → a verified result for the state.

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 11

Sources and limitations of the methodology

• FZ №7-FZ "About non-profit organizations": the form of the state corporation is fixed with 1999 years.

• Rostec: official results of 2024 years (revenue, profit, investment, civil products).

• ROSATOM: strategic and public report 2024 years.

• VEB.RF: disclosure of annual and issuer statements.

• Integral indices in the presentation are the author's analytical scale, not official statistics.

RUSSIA • Balance of state corporations 1996–2025 • 12

Published files

Analytics · Full published text

Intangible Assets: Global Experience in Valuation and Accounting

Source Status: Primary Document

Study of international standards, corporate practice and approaches to disclosure of intangible assets with conclusions for Russia.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/nma-mirovoi-opyt-otsenki-i-ucheta

Open on the site

NMA: world experience of assessment and accounting - international standards, corporate practice and conclusions for Russia

Executive summary

The target audience of the report: state bodies of the Russian Federation, state property management bodies, large state corporations and companies with state participation, development institutions, industry regulators, financial directors, strategy services, evaluation, internal control and intellectual property management.

The main conclusion of the study: in the world economy, a gap has formed between the economic significance of intangible capital and its visibility in the balance sheet. HMA in the strict accounting sense is only part of the wider intangible capital: significant investments in organizational capital, data, brands, human capital, design, business processes and part of digital resources are not recognized as assets under the current rules. This gap is one of the reasons why IASB with 2024 the Year of Comprehensive Review IAS 38; in July 2026 The Board continued to discuss, inter alia, the definition of IA, SaaS, software, and new types of intangible resources, while without making final decisions1]

The scale of the problem is already macroeconomic. According to evaluation WIPO and London Business School, in a sample of 29 The economy, which is about 57% Global GDP, investments in intangible assets in 2025 the Year of Over $10 trillion In real terms for 2008–2025 The years have grown on average by about 3,5% Each year, approximately 3,6 times faster than material investments; the aggregate intensity of intangible investments has reached 12,8% GDP vs 11,8% GDP is material. [2]

However, the balance sheet does not reflect all this capital. The international statistical tradition, which dates back to the work of Corrado-Hulten-Sichel, includes not only non-material investments in R&D and software, but also organizational capital, design, marketing assets and a number of other competencies. It is this expanded approach that is used by the modern Global database INTAN-Invest WIPO. [3]

IFRS/IAS 38 b) builds recognition on identity and control: an IA is an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical form; it must be separable or arise from contractual or other legal rights. Among the typical objects IASB names software, licenses, trademarks, patents, films and copyrights. Own brands, publishing names, client lists and similar independently created objects IAS 38 It is forbidden to capitalize.]4]

US GAAP more conservative than most R&D: Topic 730 Requires, as a rule, to write off the costs of research and development in costs as they arise; there are special models for software. Acquired in business combinations identifiable IAs, by contrast, are recognised separately from goodwill by acquisition-date fair value. V September 2025 years FASB Gaz ASU 2025-06 internal-use software, and the issues of internally created NMA continue to be in the field of work FASB. [5]

The EU for consolidated statements of companies whose securities are traded in regulated markets uses the EU-approved IFRS; the mandatory regime has been in force for the relevant consolidated statements since 2005. In addition, Accounting Directive regulates national regimes: for example, it allows the capitalization of development costs in cases provided for by national law, and provides depreciation solutions for goodwill and development costs. [6]

China is a particularly interesting example for Russia, as it complements the classical regulation of IA with a special data resources regime. CAS 6 divides research and development: the research stage is related to expenses, and development stage costs can be recognized as an asset if the established conditions are met. With 1 January 2024, there are temporary rules for the accounting reflection of corporate data resources, including the disclosure of resources that have not met the criteria for recognition as an asset. At the same time, the Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China is developing a standardized data assets assessment infrastructure - a library of standards, rules, indicators, models and cases. [7]

For M&A, the value of HMA is particularly high. The buyer recognizes those assets that the seller may not have at all on the balance sheet. Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard has resulted in a final purchase price $75,408 billion: $21,969 billion were assigned to identifiable IAs and $51,001 billion — on goodwill. From NMA $11,619 billion the Marketing-related Assets, $9,689 billion — technology-based and $0,661 billion — customer-related. [8]

This means that two economically similar companies — one grown organically, the other collected through acquisitions — can demonstrate significantly different accounting values of IA. This asymmetry is already at the heart of the discussion at IASB: the Council is explicitly addressing the issue of comparability internally generated and acquired intangible assets. [9]

Assessment of IA in international practice is based on three families of approaches: market, income and cost. IFRS 13 directly considers market, income and cost approaches as widely used valuation techniques; IVS provides an international professional assessment infrastructure. For brands usually used relief-from-royalty, for customer relations and key technologies — MPEEM, for contracts and non-compete — with-and-without, for licenses sometimes greenfield; for reproducible software systems and databases, replacement-cost approach is applicable10]

For Russia, the key conclusion is not to mechanically capitalize all intangible costs, but to create a two-circuit system:

Contour A — regulated balance sheet: FSBU 14/2022, tax accounting, audit, evaluation, impeachment, legally proven rights.
Contour B is a management register of intangible capital: R&D, patents, technologies, software, data, models AI, know-how, organizational capital, competencies, client/partner networks, licenses, digital twins and other resources - including those that cannot be recognized as accounting NMAs.

Such an architecture preserves the reliability of financial reporting, but eliminates the strategic “invisibility” of resources. In Russia, the basic regulatory platform already exists: FSBU 14/2022 It is required starting with the reporting of 2024 year, and FSO XI regulates the valuation of intellectual property and IA. Therefore, the task 2026–2030 The first is the integration of accounting, valuation, legal, technological and management contours, rather than the creation of another isolated standard11]

The economic nature of IA and the classification system

The terms “intangible asset”, “intellectual property” and “intangible capital” are not synonymous.

Po IAS 38 An IA is an identifiable non-monetary asset without a physical substance. Identity exists if the asset is separable — that is, potentially sold, transferred, or licensed — or arises from contractual or other legal rights12]

Intellectual property represents the legal category of rights - patents, trademarks, copyrights, industrial designs, trade secrets and other protected results. Not every economically valuable IA is a registered IP, and the registered right itself does not guarantee a significant economic value.

Intangible capital is a broader economic category. The modern macroeconomic tradition of Corrado-Hulten-Sichel extends the investment concept beyond accounting IAs, including knowledge, organizational competencies and other resources that can create a future release. This approach became the basis of subsequent international research into intangible investment. [3]

Working classification for public and corporate governance
ClassTypical objectsAccounting recognitionMain source of valueKey risk
Technologicalpatents, technologies, algorithms, software, technical documentationoften possible when purchasing; own development depends on the criteriacost savings, licensing, additional cash flowstechnological obsolescence
Marketingtrademarks, brands, domainspurchased - usually yes; own brand at IAS 38 - noroyalty/economic premiumReputational risk
Clientcontracts, customer relationships, backlogThey occur most frequently in PPA.Customer retention and future marginchurn, concentration
Artistic and mediamovies, music, copyrights, content librariesdepends on the rights and standards of specific contentlicenses, subscriptions, advertisingChange in demand
Contractual-licensedfranchises, concessions, licenses, access rightsUnder the control of the law, often yes.Right to conduct activitiesregulatory termination
Scientificcapitalized development, acquired IPR&DEqually IFRS/US GAAPProbability of commercializationTechnical/Clinical Failure
Datadatabases, structured datasets, training setsdepends on control, identification and costs; China sets out special regulationsanalytics, AI, optimizationrights, quality, leakage
Organizationalprocesses, operating model, routes, supply-chain know-howUsually out of balance.ProductivityDependence on staff
Human capitalcompetence, training, teamsAn asset of the company is usually not recognized.Innovation and productivityStaff mobility
GoodwillSynergies, Assembled Workforce and Other Unidentifiable Transaction EffectsOnly acquired goodwillResidual value of businessOverpayment and Impairment

It is therefore critical to separate the three perimeters: legally protected rights, accounting IAs and economic intangible capital. Their crossing is incomplete. IAS 38, For example, it explicitly excludes recognition of self-created brands, mastheads, publishing titles, and customer lists, although they may have obvious economic value13]

Therefore, the value of "NMA in the balance sheet" can not be used as a direct indicator of the technological or intellectual potential of the enterprise. This is particularly significant when comparing an organic business with a company actively acquiring technology through M&A. IASB addresses this issue in the framework of the ongoing project on Intangible Assets. [9]

International standards of recognition, accounting and taxation

Comparison of main systems
ParameterIFRS / IAS 38US GAAPEuropean UnionChina / CASRussia
Basic systemIAS 38 + IAS 36 + IFRS 3 + IFRS 13ASC 350, 730, 805, 820; special software tipsEU-endorsed IFRS for relevant consolidated statements + Accounting DirectiveCAS 6 + CAS impairment + Special Data Resources RegulationsFSBU 14/2022 + FSBU 26/2020; FSO XI for evaluation
DefinitionNon-monetary asset without physical formseveral specialized models; identificable intangibles separately from goodwill in M&AIFRS-model for listed groups; national reporting - under Directive/national lawclassic model CAS 6, close to the logic of research / developmentindependent federal standard since 2024.
ResearchExpenseusually flow rate on Topic 730IFRS or national lawExpensethe FSBU and the applicable capex model
Developmentcapitalization only if the criteria IAS 38many R&D costs — expenses; special exceptions, primarily softwaredepends on IFRS/national regimecapitalization under conditions CAS 6capitalization under the conditions of the FSBU
Own brandnot admitteddoes not usually form a recognized independent IAIFRS-similarRecognition is limited to general criteriadepends on the criteria of the FSBU, legal and actual control
Bought by MMAcost; in business combination — fair valuefair value in business combinationIFRS/national regulationsseparate recognition as applicable CASActual/fair value according to applicable standards
NMA of the final SPADepreciationDepreciationDepreciationDepreciationDepreciation
NMA of uncertain sleepwithout depreciation + annual impairmentwithout depreciation + impairment modelIFRS - similarlySpecial Impairment Controlthe FSBU
GoodwillIFRS 3/IAS 36; not IAS 38; no depreciation,impairmentpublic companies: impeachment-only; there are alternatives for private companiesIFRS for the respective groups; Directive allows for a national depreciation modelBusiness-combination rulesregulated separately by applicable rules
DataThere is no separate universal data assets standard yetSpecial rules depend on the nature of the resourceDiscussion EFRAG/ECfrom 2024 special rules enterprise data resourcesso far mainly general model of IA/rights/information assets

Sources of comparative table: IASB by IAS 38, IAS 36, IFRS 3 and the current Intangible Assets project; FASB by Topics 730/805 and ASU 2025-06; EU Regulation 1606/2002 and Accounting Directive; the Ministry of Finance of China CAS 6 and data resources; The Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation and the official portal of legal information on the FSBU 14/2022 and FSO XI. [14]

IFRS: recognition, subsequent evaluation and disclosure

IAS 38 allows the recognition of only an identifiable resource that meets the requirements of the standard. For internally generated assets, the costs must be divided into research phase and development phase. Development can be capitalized only after meeting the established criteria, including technical feasibility, intent and the ability to complete the development/use or sell the result and the ability to reliably measure the costs involved. Own brands and client lists are not subject to capitalization. [15]

Once recognised, end-of-life assets are systematically depreciated over that period and are tested against impeachment on appropriate grounds. Assets with an indefinite period are not depreciated, but are subject to annual impairment checks. Similarly, goodwill and HMAs not yet available for use are tested annually. [16]

IAS 36 defines recoverable amount as the largest of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. Consequently, an impairment is not an accounting formality, but a new assessment of an asset's ability or cash-generating unit to maintain its carrying amount. [17]

Of particular importance is IFRS 3: in M&A, the acquirer must separate the identifiable intangible assets from the goodwill. That is why a brand, technology or customer relationship that was not in the balance sheet of the acquired company can appear on the balance sheet of the buyer for the first time. [18]

US GAAP

US GAAP different from IFRS Especially with my R&D. Topic 730 The R&D costs are deducted as they arise FASB Historically, it explains uncertainty of future benefits, measurability problems, and weak direct correlation between the size of today's costs and future economic outcome19]

There is a more fragmented system. For software to be sold/leased/marketed, the costs before reaching the technological functionality are on R&D expense, after reaching the functionality and before the general release are capitalized. For internal-use software, Subtopic is used 350-40; in 2025 the Year FASB completed the corresponding project ASU 2025-06. [20]

In business combination, the American model, on the contrary, requires the recognition of identifiable assets and liabilities and the evaluation of the corresponding acquired HMA separately from goodwill. [21]

For public companies, goodwill is not systematically depreciated, but is tested on an impeachment-level reporting unit; FASB also provides an annual impeachment model for indefinite-lived intangible assets. [22]

European Union

Regulation No 1606/2002 has formed the European infrastructure for the application of international standards: the relevant public groups use IFRS, approved by the EU, for consolidated reporting. The current codification of approved international standards is contained, inter alia, in Regulation (EU) 2023/1803 with subsequent amendments. [23]

For companies located outside the corresponding IFRS-perimeter, Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU plays an essential role. It requires the systematic write-off of IA during a useful economic life and provides for national development cost decisions; if the term goodwill or development cost cannot be reliably determined, the Member State shall fix the period within the range permitted by the Directive. [24]

EFRAG has repeatedly fixed a more fundamental problem: the current system does not display a significant part of internally generated signals, which reduces the comparability of asset-light and knowledge-intensive companies. [25]

China

CAS 6 was published in 2006 Year and put into operation with 1 January 2007. The Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China confirms the strict boundary between research and development: the costs of the research stage are recognized in the current result, and the costs of the development stage are capitalized only if the criteria of the standard are met; previously written-off costs cannot be retroactively restored as an asset26]

Especially important is the Chinese experiment with data as a managed economic resource. Temporary rules on enterprise data resources were published in August 2023 years and came into force 1 January 2024. They apply to data resources that meet recognition requirements, including as IAs or stocks, and provide for additional disclosure of controlled data resources that may generate economic benefits but have not been recognized due to non-compliance with criteria27]

In 2024, the Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China demanded the development of a data assets evaluation system and directly designated the creation of a standard library, rule library, indicator library, model library and case library, as well as the use of digital technologies to predict their cost. This is no longer just an accounting standard, but an element of the industrial policy of intangible capital management. [28]

Timeline for regulatory development

Key Stages - Formation IAS 38, US Transition GAAP to impeachment-only goodwill, European mandatory application IFRS, CAS 6, the Russian FSBU 14/2022, Chinese data resources regulations and current revision IAS 38. [29]

On 30 August 2026 new edition IAS 38 Not yet accepted: 22 July 2026 IASB discussed potential changes to the definition and supporting requirements, using licensing/SaaS as a test case, but no decisions were made on the standard at that time. Therefore, organizations should not prematurely build accounting on the proposed future model IASB. [30]

Tax implications

The accounting value of IA and the tax base of IA can vary significantly, creating temporary differences and deducted tax on IAS 12. In M&A transactions, this is particularly noticeable: the fair-value step-up of the acquired IA is able to simultaneously form a deferred tax liability, which in turn affects the amount of goodwill. [31]

JurisdictionThe key tax principleManagement consequence
USAPurchased Section 197 Intangibles are usually amortized for tax linearly for 15 yearsThe tax period may be radically different from the accounting useful life
United States - R&ETax years after 31.12.2024 Section 174A allows the current deduction of domestic R&E or, optionally, capitalization and depreciation of at least 60 monthsTax policy again diverges from US GAAP R&D model
ChinaIA for tax is usually amortized straight-line for at least 10 years; purchased software under conditions — at least 2 yearsSignificant impact of classification on cash tax
EUAccounting harmonization is not equal to the full unification of corporate tax; national regimes are in force, plus a pan-European anti-avoidance frameworkTransfer pricing, royalties, IP location and exit-tax effects are especially important
Russiafrom 2025 for certain high-tech NMA, Russian software, AI and individual R&D results, increased tax recognition of costs is possible, including a coefficient of 2 under the conditions provided by lawit is advisable to link the register of IA with the tax system

Sources: IRS on ?197 and ?174A, tax authorities of China, European Commission and Federal Tax Service of Russia. [32]

It is especially important for Russia that the 1 January 2025 The FTS points to the possibility of taking into account double the cost when forming the initial cost of certain high-tech NMAs, including exclusive rights to Russian software / databases and the results of research and development provided for by law; the application of the corresponding option should be fixed in the tax accounting policy33]

Valuation methods, depreciation, impairment and disclosure

Evaluation architecture

IFRS 13 establishes the general principle of fair value as a market valuation and distinguishes three widely used valuation approaches: market approach, income approach and cost approach. International standards for evaluation IVS provide a professional methodology for their application; current edition IVS has been updated in 2024 the Year of Application 2025 year, and in 2026 the Year IVSC Continued development IVS 210 Intangible Assets. [34]

It is important to distinguish:

the cost for financial statements, determined within IFRS/US GAAP;

market/fair value for M&A or independent valuation;

investment/strategic value to a specific owner;

tax value;

value-in-use or strategic value.

They don't have to match.

Comparison of approaches and methods
Approach / MethodBasic LogicThe most typical MMAStrength SideThe main risk
Market - comparable transactionsCost is derived from transactions with analogueslicenses, patents, domains, content in the presence of transactionsReliance on the foreign marketComparisons are rarely comparable.
Market - royalty comparablesRoyalty Rate Market Benchmarkbrands, patents, technologyMarket anchoring income valuationLicense conditions are not uniform
Income — Relief-from-RoyaltyPV license fees that the owner saves by owning the assetbrands, brands, patents, technologyLogically Linking Law to IncomeSensitivity to royalty rate and revenue forecast
Income — MPEEMPV residual cash flow after charges per contribution assetscustomer relationships, core technology, IPR&DPrimary income-generating assetrisk double counting and disputed CAC
Income — With-and-WithoutPV business "with an asset" minus PV business "without it"non-compete, contracts, customer relationsDirect Measurement of Incremental EconomicsCounterfactual scenario is subjective
Income — Greenfieldcash flow of the asset after the cost/time to create the remaining required resourceslicences, franchises, permitsuseful for rights requiring supporting assetsTime sensitive to ramp-up
Cost — Replacement Costcurrent cost of creating equivalent utility minus obsolescenceSoftware, databases, content librariesEasier to reproduce the objectCosts may not correlate with future benefits
Cost — Reproduction CostThe cost of accurate reproductionspecialized bases, documentationuseful if necessary exact responsecan assess unnecessary historical complexity

IFRS 13 explicitly allows for market, cost, and income approaches, but does not prescribe one universal method for IA. The choice of method is determined by the characteristics of the asset and the availability of data. In practice PPA The Big Four is widely described RFR, MPEEM, with-and-without and greenfield as options for a profitable approach to acquired intangible assets35]

Notes on basic methods

Relief-from-Royalty. Simplified conceptual formula:

where is the applicable tax effect, the discount rate, and terminal value is allowed only where it is compatible with the economic term of the asset. The method treats value as the present value of hypothetical royalty payments that the owner avoids by owning the object. [36]

Critical Assumptions: forecast revenue, royalty benchmark, legal territory of law, remaining useful life, tax rate, discount rate, competitive obsolescence.

MPEEM.

where is the contribution asset charges for the use of other resources, without which the estimated NMA would not create cash flow.

The key risk is to incorrectly attribute an excessively large portion of the return to one intangible asset or to double-count the benefits in multiple assets. That's why MPEEM is most appropriate for a single dominant income-generating asset rather than multiple interdependent IAs at the same time. Practice PPA The Big Four MPEEM, In particular, customer relationships, technologies and IPR&D. [37]

With-and-Without.

The method requires a realistic counterfactual scenario. When evaluating a non-compete, license or customer relationship, it is not necessary to model the “disappearance of the whole company”, but rather the economic consequence of the absence of a specific right.

Cost Approach. For software IFRS 13 illustrates the logic of current replacement cost: how much would a market participant today pay for the creation of a substitute asset comparable utility adjusted for functional/economic absolutes38]

That’s why the cost approach is especially useful for infrastructure software, datasets or libraries, but much weaker for the brand: a brand worth billions can be created by historical expenses that do not themselves explain the future premium margin.

Brands & ISO 10668

ISO 10668 sets the framework for monetary brand valuation: the purpose of the assessment, the basis, the approaches, the methods, the quality of the data and the requirements for the report. V 2026 the Year ISO It is also working to update the relevant standardization, which reflects the growing importance of brand valuation39]

Useful life and depreciation

The economic term of an IA is not determined solely by the legal term of protection. It should take into account the technological cycle, customer behavior, likelihood of replacement, competition, maintenance extenditure, contractual constraints, and the ability of the enterprise to continue to benefit.

For rapidly aging algorithms or technologies, economic life can be much shorter than the patent term; on the contrary, a trademark can legally be renewed repeatedly, which, under appropriate circumstances, can support indefinite-life assessment.

At Microsoft, after the purchase of Activision Blizzard, the final PPA gave sharply different terms: marketing-related intents - 24, technology-based - 4, customer-related - 4. This is a clear example of why a single "normative term of the NMA" is economically incorrect. [40]

Impairment as an area of assessed risk

Impairment is particularly sensitive to:

  • revenue forecasts and margins;
  • discount rate/WACC;
  • long-term growth rate;
  • probability of successful development;
  • Regulatory approval period;
  • market share and churn;
  • technological substitution;
  • royalty rates and useful lives.

Pfizer, for example, has an impairment of 2023 The year included about $2,8 billion, including $1,4 billion by IPR&D etrasimod and $964 Million by developed technology rights Prevnar 13; Reasons included changes in development plans, revenue expectations, transition to vaccines with wider coverage, and competitive pressures41]

Disclosure

A good disclosure of an IA should answer not only the question “how much is an asset on the balance sheet?” but at least five questions:

What is this resource → why is it controlled → as the value of → will last economic life → what assumptions can cause impeachment.

It is advisable for state corporations to go beyond the minimum requirements of accounting standards and disclose administratively significant data on patent families, technologies, software, data assets, critical know-how, terms of legal protection, monetization models, licensing, dependence on key specialists and cybersecurity - subject to the regime of state, commercial and technological secrecy.

Corporate practices, industries and impact on M&A

Cases of transnational companies
Company / caseNMA and EventMethod / ModelWhat the case showsMain problem
Microsoft — Activision Blizzardpurchase price $75,408 billion; $21,969 billion identifiable intangibles; $51,001 billion goodwillacquisition-date fair-value PPA; subsequent goodwill test Microsoft uses DCF with risk-adjusted WACCa huge part of the price of the technological transaction exists as MMA and goodwillseparation of brand/technology/customer value from synergies
Microsoft - Follow-upActivision: marketing $11,619 billion / 24 years; technology $9,689 billion / 4 years;customer $0,661 billion / 4 yearsuseful-life amortization; goodwill impairment DCFThe economic life of different NMAs is radically differentforecast and technological obsolescence
Pfizer$2,8 billion Impairment of the NMA 2023 c. including IPR&D and developed technologycome/DCF; in Pfizer practice, MPEEM is used for a number of HMAsThe cost of the drug depends on clinical, competitive and commercial probabilityBinary/Probability R&D Outcomes
Disney / TFCF and media assetsin fiscal 2020 near $5 billion Goodwill/intangible effects, partly due to COVID-19impairment models, forecast cash flowsThe cost of media brands, channels and rights is sensitive to structural changes in the audiencestreaming disruption, content economics
Disney is a modern portfolioin fiscal 2024 $1,3 billion goodwill implementation by entertainment linear networksimpairment testingObsolescence of the business model can destroy IA without physical wearsecular decline linear TV
BP / Energy sectorE&E rights, licenses, software, patents and other rights interact with IFRS 6/IAS 38historical cost/impact; fair value at M&Aenergy IA is often a right of access to a resource or technology, not just a patentreserve potential, license, regulatory conditions and commodity prices

Sources for Microsoft, Pfizer, Disney, and industry model extractive industries. [42]

Microsoft also has a direct impact PPA for subsequent profit: depreciation intangible assets in fiscal 2025 Imprint $6,0 billion, Against $4,8 billion in 2024 and $2,5 billion in 2023. This means that the distribution of purchase price between amortised NMA and goodwill directly changes the post-deal learnings profile43]

Goodwill by Activision $51,001 billion and, as explained by Microsoft, was mainly related to the expected integration of synergies; almost all of this goodwill company considered not subject to tax deduction. This clearly shows that goodwill is not just a “bad value detail” but a residue that includes synergistic effects that are not separately identifiable by the IA44]

Technology sector

It is dominated by:

Software and algorithms; databases; patents; trained models and model-related know-how; developer ecosystems; customer relations; cloud/SaaS contractual rights; brand; organizational know-how.

The main accounting problem is the gap between value creation and capitalization. The huge costs of developers and research can immediately reduce profits, while the acquisition of similar technology through M&A creates an identical intuitive asset. FASB and IASB both continue to work on software/intangibles; IASB specifically considers agile development, cloud/SaaS, AI and data as test cases of modernity45]

For the state, this means that the balance sheet of a state-owned IT company cannot be the only source of assessment of its technological capital.

Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Critical NMAs: patents, compound rights, licenses, IPR&D, regulatory dossiers, developed technology, trademarks.

A unique feature is the optional and probabilistic nature of value. The drug may have a huge expected value before the end of the tests, but this cost is determined by the probabilities of transition between phases, the period before launch, patent exclusivity, pricing/reimbursement and competitive landscape.

The Pfizer case demonstrates this volatility: the adjustment of development plans and commercial forecasts can cause billions of dollars of influence charges. [41]

For the evaluation of pharmaceutical IPR&D, therefore, probability-adjusted DCF/rNPV is more useful than the mechanical capitalization of historical R&D cost.

Media and entertainment

Critical objects: content libraries, copyrights, character franchises, brands, distribution rights, subscriber/customer relationships.

Here, the main risk is not physical wear and tear, but a change in the mode of consumption. Disney has already fixed major impeachment charges as during COVID-19, and later in linear entertainment46]

The cost of a media asset should therefore be associated with an active audience, engagement, retention, monetization per user, licensing potential, and realigning economic relevance of content.

Energy

In the energy sector, a significant part of the intangible economy is distributed among several standards: mineral/exploration rights, licenses, concessions, seismic/geological data, patents, software, control algorithms, grid models, customer contracts, carbon-related rights.

IFRS 6 specifically regulates exploration and evaluation expansion; the costs of development mineral resources already come out of this perimeter and interact with others IFRS, including IAS 38 where appropriate. This makes the energy sector a good example of why a single corporate register of intangible capital should be wider than one accounting line "MA"47]

For Russia, this is especially important for geological data, subsoil use licenses, technological models of production, software, digital twins of deposits, proprietary process know-how and R&D results.

HMA in M&A: systemic effect

Simplified purchase price allocation can be represented as:

taking into account other assets, liabilities, deferred taxes and the requirements of the applicable standard.

Therefore, the assessment of IA changes simultaneously:

goodwill cost; future depreciation; EBIT/operating profit; deferred tax; future impeachment risk; ROA/ROIC; post-merger KPI.

This creates a conflict of incentives. Other things being equal, a greater distribution per finite-lived intangibles increases future depreciation; a greater distribution in goodwill reduces scheduled depreciation for public IFRS/US-GAAP model, but increases the concentration of impact risk. Science literature really does consider goodwillPPA as an area of significant management dissection and potential early management48]

That is why for large state M&A, the independence of the evaluation function must be institutionally separated from the team, KPI of which depend on immediate improvement of post-deal learnings.

IA in the national economy: data, infrastructure, risks and new tools

Intangible investment as a macroeconomic category

The current capital structure is changing faster than the financial reporting system. Po WIPO, in 2025 the Year of Intangible Investments 29 The observed economies have exceeded $10 trillion; aggregate intent-investment intensity achieved 12,8% GDP. The United States had 15,6%, France 15,2%, a Sweden — 17,4% GDP. [2]

Important: these figures are not the book value of the IA. These are macroeconomic investment estimates of the broader intangible capital. It is impossible, for example, to take the indicator WIPO 12,8% and use it as a normative share of NMA in the Russian corporate balance sheet.

For the EU, the link between intellectual property and economic structure is also significant. By research EUIPO 2026, IPR-intense industries provided 30,6% the EU Employment and 47,9% economic activity/GDP on average 2021–2023 years; they received more 88% considered by private-equity/venture funding startups49]

This does not mean that 47,9% GDP is "created only by patents": EUIPO classifies the industry as IPR-intensive in terms of IP usage and emphasizes intersections of different types of rights. But the indicator demonstrates the system connection of IP and the most capital-intensive innovation chains. [50]

Proposed circular chart of the structure of the intangible investment

For international benchmark it is advisable to visualize the structure based on categories WIPO/Global INTAN-Invest. The chart below is illustrative: the shares are rounded to whole values from the published distribution and should not be interpreted as a structure of Russian IAs or as a balance sheet.

The main analytical meaning of this diagram is organizational resources, R&D and software/data are comparable in economic importance to the traditional patent-brand concept of IA, but a significant part of them does not appear as a recognized asset. The international base WIPO develops the extended concept of Corrado-Hulten-Sichel. [51]

Regulatory shift to data

Chinese experience shows the possible direction of the next generation of regulation: not to declare all data as an asset, but to create conditions for recognition, disclosure and a separate data resources management infrastructure. C 2024 Chinese companies have received a special accounting framework, and public policy simultaneously requires the development of standards for the evaluation and control of data assets52]

In 2026, China also published a national data assets classification and coding standard, which refers to existing Chinese HMA classification standards and to ISO 55013 for data assets management. This indicates a shift from single-entry accounting entries to a machine-readable asset class management infrastructure. [53]

Registers as a basic tool

For a large corporation, a quality register of IA must contain at least:

Resource ID → owner/controlling organization → Legal basis → Author/developer → Territory → term of law → Accounting status → tax status → valuation basis → cost → Method → date of evaluation → useful life → impairment triggers → Product/R&D → cybersecurity classification → KPI → history.

Russian infrastructure already has some elements of such a system. Rospatent maintains open registers of industrial property objects; GIS/single electronic infrastructure for maintaining state registers of intellectual activity results is developing. [54]

For subsoil use, Rosnedra uses an information licensing system with GISFunctionality of Spatial Analysis. This provides a natural basis for the connection of law + Geography + Resource + Technology + Valuation in the energy sector. [55]

GIS

GIS is especially useful where the value of the NMA is tied to the territory:

Subsoil use licenses; concessions; infrastructure rights; spectrum rights; natural resources; geological datasets; territorial brands; breeding achievements; IP used in specific production facilities.

For public administration, this allows you to move from the IMA table to the spatial balance of intellectual and technological rights.

Blockchain / distributed ledger

A distributed ledger is potentially useful not for "creating value" of an IA, but primarily for:

timestamping of origin → evidence version → chain of title → licensing → fixation transfer rights → audit trail.

WIPO noted the blockchain's potential to fix creation time and rights information, and EUIPO since 2021 developed European IP Registers in Blockchain. [56]

However, blockchain cannot be turned into an end in itself. It does not automatically prove economic value, does not replace the legal validity of the law and does not eliminate the error of the original data. It is important that your own service WIPO PROOF was discontinued in January 2022 The availability of timestamping technology does not yet guarantee a long-term institutional service model57]

Therefore, for Russia the priority should be:

Unified semantics and identifier NMA → legally significant register → API → versioning/audit trail → only then choose blockchain or conventional trusted database.

Estimated uncertainty and manipulation

NMAs are among the most judgment-intensive reporting objects. The fewer deals observed, the greater the role of Level 3 assumptions: sales forecasts, royalty rates, churn, useful life, terminal growth, and discount rate.

Main channels of manipulation:

over-capitalization of own costs → artificial increase in profit;

overrated useful life → understatement depreciation exploit;

aggressive royalty rate or optimistic DCF → Fair value is overvalued;

too high goodwill in PPA → Lower systematic post-deal depreciation;

delayed impeachment → retention of inflated assets and earnings;

Transfer price IP → transfer of profits between jurisdictions.

Studies do find a link between goodwill/impairment discrimination and PPA with research-management indicators, and European tax authorities separately consider transfer pricing and placement patents as a potential channel of profit shifting. [58]

Cyber Risks

An intangible asset can lose value without destroying the physical infrastructure. Leakage of source code, trade secrets, training set, engineering documentation or access keys can deprive the resource of exclusivity, reduce licensing potential or destroy competitive advantage.

NIST in industrial cybersecurity research noted IP theft as one of the leading cyberthreats for advanced manufacturing; wider NIST-materials refer to the economic consequences of cyber incidents business interference, fines, response costs and misappropriation of information59]

Hence the principal conclusion:

Cyber security HMA should be part of the valuation and implementation system, not just the security function.

For a critical asset, the registry should contain its cyber-classification, location, backup/recovery status, privileged-access map, third-party exposure, and assessment of the loss-of-exclusive effect on value.

Recommendations for Russian practice and state-corporate policy

Russia has already taken a significant step: the FSBU 14/2022 is used from the reporting period of 2024, and the FSO XI forms the professional basis for the assessment of intellectual property and IA. The next stage should be built not as another reform of the plan of accounts, but as a national system of intangible capital management. [60]

Legal Outline

The first direction is to create a single passport of an intangible resource applicable to state corporations and largest companies with state participation.

It should not mean automatic recognition of each object of the IA in the balance sheet. The passport should independently indicate:

legal status; accounting status; tax status; valuation status; security status; state significance.

This eliminates the fundamental error "if an object is not in the balance sheet, then it does not exist as an economic asset."

For IP created under a government contract or with budget co-financing, a machine-readable chain should be provided:

Methodological outline

The sectoral methodological profiles of the IA should be approved, rather than trying to apply one model to the entire economy.

IndustryPriority IAPriority of evaluationKPI
IT / AISoftware, models, datasets, algorithms, patentsincome + cost + technology benchmarkrevenue enabled, reuse, deployment, time-to-market
Pharmapatents, IPR&D, licenses, dossiersprobability-adjusted incomerisk-adjusted NPV, approvals, exclusivity
Mediarights, brands, libraries, charactersRFR + incomeaudience, ARPU, licensing, retention
Energylicenses, geological data, software, process know-howincome/cost + GISreserves enabled, production efficiency, licensing
Mechanical Engineeringpatents, engineering know-how, digital twinscost + incomelocalization, yield, lifecycle cost
WPC / Critical Technologiesknow-how, software, trade secrets, documentationsecure internal valuationtechnological sovereignty, substitutability
Transport / Infrastructuresoftware, concession rights, traffic data, modelsincome/costcapacity, reliability, cost reduction

Methodical requirements should prohibit the use of a single value number without interval/sensitivity analysis for material Level-3-type valuations.

For a meaningful NMA, the report must show a minimum base/downside/upside case and sensitivity to the three main assumptions.

Institutional Outline

It is advisable to form a national methodological platform for the assessment and statistics of the NMA on the principle close to the Chinese architecture:

Library of objects → library of methods → Parameter Library → library royalty/transaction benchmarks → library useful lives → the Impairment Cases Library → Industry Indexes.

Chinese data assets policy explicitly assumes similar standard/rule/indicator/model/case libraries. [61]

The Russian contour can be built on a bundle:

Minfin → Ministry of Economic Development/Assessment Community → Rospatent → Rosstat → FNS → Sectoral Departments → Rosimushchestvo → State Corporation → development institutions.

The accounting value remains within the competence of the applicable standards, and a single platform creates a benchmark infrastructure, not the administrative “state patent price”.

The two-contour balance of intangible capital

It is recommended for state corporations to form annually:

Financial layer: recognized intangible assets + goodwill + depreciation + impact.

Strategic layer: all controlled intangible capital, including unrecognized resources.

Example:

ResourceIn the balanceIn the strategic registerEvaluationKPI
acquired patentYeah.Yeah.RFR/DCFlicensing revenue
own brandoften notYeah.RFRbrand premium
own know-howoften notYeah.income/costcost advantage
Developed byDepends on criteriaYeah.cost/incomereuse + savings
DataDepends on criteriaYeah.income/costmonetisation / productivity
Team CompetencesnoneYes, aggregatednot necessarily monetarycritical-skills coverage
organisational capitalnoneYeah.mainly KPIproductivity
goodwillYes after M&AYeah.impairment modelrealization of synergies

It is this approach that allows not to destroy the reliability of accounting by excessive capitalization, but at the same time to give the state a real map of intellectual capital.

NMA and system KPI

In the public sector, it is dangerous to stimulate management of KPI "growth of the carrying amount of IA": it can be performed through M&A, cost capitalization or optimistic estimates without creating a real economic effect.

It is more correct to build a chain from resource to result:

This means that the unit of efficiency is not the patent itself, but the economic output of the controlled technology.

KPI national and corporate level

A limited set of cross-cutting indicators is appropriate for authorities and state corporations.

KPIFormula / MeaningTarget effect
Coverage of intangible inventoryIdentified Material Resources / Valuation General AssemblyEliminate the “no-hold” NMAs
Legal protection coverageCritical IA with documented rights regime / all critical IAProtection of ownership
Commercialization rateIA with Industrial/Commercial Use/Commercialized Portfoliofrom patents to issue
External IP revenueroyalties + licensing incomeMeasuring the Technology Market
Internal technology effectconfirmed savings/added EBITDA from own technologiesMeasuring Productivity
R&D-to-deployment cycletime from development milestone to industrial implementationAccelerating the innovation cycle
Dormant IP shareMMA without use and monetization planCleaning the Portfolio
Impairment forecast accuracyforecast recoverable amount vs actual outcomesmonitor the quality of assessments
Valuation confidenceshare of material valuations with independent review and sensitivity analysisreduce model risk
Cyber-protected critical IAcritical IA with installed security baselineprotect the intangible value
M&A synergy realizationImplemented effect / synergy case transactionscontrol goodwill
Data resource coveragecritical datasets with owner, rights, quality and security metadatago to data governance

The absolute amount of IA should not become a key state indicator: the inter-industry comparability of such a sum is low, and the incentive to overestimation is too large.

Funding under IP

The next level of maturity is the use of qualitatively identified and evaluated IA for financing, collateral structures, licensing and securitization where legally and economically permissible.

the European Institutions 2026 The IP-backed finance is separately examined and noted that one of the reasons for the weak use of IP as collateral remains the lack of clarity and acceptance of the relevant assets by creditors62]

Therefore, the state stimulation of IP-backed lending in Russia should begin not with the mandatory acceptance of a patent by the bank as collateral, but with:

due diligence standard; encumbrance register; uniform valuation reports; statistics recoveries; secondary market; insurance of individual risks; recovery procedures.

Tax policy

Russian tax incentives are already moving in the direction of priority technological NMA 2025 For a number of Russian programs, databases, AI-related and certain R&D-generated rights, increasing coefficients are provided33]

The next principle should be that the tax incentive depends not only on the fact of purchase or registration of the asset, but also on meaningful technological activities. Otherwise, the system risks stimulating legal re-registration of rights instead of developing technologies.

For international groups, a separate control is necessary:

DEMPE-like economics → Where technology is created → What is R&D Risk → Who controls the IP → Where is Royalty → What is arm's-length valuation.

The international experience of the EU shows that placing patents and royalty flows can become a profit shifting tool, so IP support policies must simultaneously have an anti-abuse layer. [63]

Roadmap of Russia for the management of IA to 2030

The proposed roadmap assumes that FSBU 14/2022 and FSO XI are already in operation; therefore, the goal is not to replace the current accounting regulation, but to create an integrated state-corporate system over it. [64]

PeriodMain actionsResultControl KPI
2026single classifier/passport of NMA; inventory in pilot state corporations; separation of accounting and strategic periodeterVisibility of Portfolio≥90% material NMA pilots identified; 100% critical assets have owner
2027unified method of valuation governance; industry profiles; sensitivity/scenario rules; API-link with IP registersComparability of evaluation100% material values have a method rationale; ≥80% — sensitivity analysis
2027–2028extension to data assets, software, AI models and know-how; cybersecurity classificationDigital Contour of NMA≥95% Critical digital assets have rights/security metadata
2028national benchmark-base of transactions, royalty ranges, useful lives and impeachment casesDecreased model risk≥5 key industries have benchmark libraries
2028–2029IA integration with M&A governance and investment committeesGoodwill Control100% M&A is independent PPA review; synergy KPI Tracked ≥3 years
2029IP-backed finance and technology rights insurance pilotsTurning IA into a financial resourcemeasured pilot volume financing; NPL/recovery statistics
2029–2030Intangible investment macrounit together with statistical contour; cross-industry balance sheetsNational map of intangible capitalRegular statistical publication
2030Integrated National Intangible Capital Observatory / platformContinuous monitoringUnified State Corporation - Science - Finance

Priority for the year 2026: not the reassessment of millions of objects, but the inventory and classification. Without a credible owner, legal nature, source of creation, product relationships, and cybersecurity, any monetary valuation would create false accuracy.

Priority 2027: Evaluation governance. For a significant IA, the state group must store the model, initial assumptions, evaluation date, confidence interval, scripts, reviewer, and audit trail.

Priority 2028: data/software/AI. Chinese experience shows that data-resource accounting is becoming an independent regulatory direction; IASB simultaneously considers data, AI, software and SaaS as part of the modernization IAS 38. It is more rational for Russia to create a data-asset register in advance, without expecting the mandatory accounting capitalization of all such resources. [65]

Priority 2029: IA funding. Only after accumulating transaction history, recoveries, and valuation accuracy is it reasonable to scale IP-backed finance.

Priority 2030 Year: Linking Corporate Registers to Macroeconomics. WIPO shows that the intangible investment has already become comparable and surpasses the intangible investment in terms of the share of GDP in the observed population of developed and large economies. Russian industrial policy, which measures only buildings, machine tools and financial investments, will systematically underestimate the technological basis of production2]

The resulting policy architecture can be reduced to seven principles:

Not to capitalize everything — to identify everything essential. IAS 38 US and GAAP maintain conservativeness is not accidental: the cost of many internally generated resources can not be reliably separated from the value of the business as a whole66]

Divide the accounting and strategic value. An unrecognized resource in the financial balance sheet can be critical to technological sovereignty.

Evaluate the script, not just the number. Sensitivity analysis and uncertainty range are required for material HMA.

Link the IA to the product and cash flow. A patent without implementation should not automatically improve KPI.

Link M&A to follow-up control of goodwill. Microsoft/Activision shows the scale PPA: at the price $75,408 billion Goodwill $51,001 billion, the Identifiable Intangibles — $21,969 billion Such amounts require years of monitoring of the actual implementation of synergies44]

Make data assets a separate direction. Here the most interesting state benchmark today is provided by China. [52]

Consider cyber security as part of value preservation. Theft of know-how or data is not only an IT incident, but a potential economic asset’s impact. [59]

As a result, by 2030 for a large Russian state corporation, the target model should look not like one line of “Intangible Assets” in the balance sheet, but as a related system:

This is the most significant lesson of world experience: the modern system of IA is no longer only accounting for intellectual property. It is an infrastructure for managing knowledge, rights, data, technology, cost and risk throughout the entire life cycle of intangible capital. Movement IASB the Comprehensive Review IAS 38, work FASB over software/intangibles, Chinese data asset institutionalization and the growing macroeconomic dimension of intangible investment WIPO point in one direction - from the static accounting of individual rights to the management of the intangible production base of the economy67]

[1] [4] [12] [13] [14] [29] https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ias-38-intangible-assets/

https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ias-38-intangible-assets/

[2] https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/world-intangible-investment-highlights-2026/en/key-trends-and-insights.html

https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/world-intangible-investment-highlights-2026/en/key-trends-and-insights.html

[3] [51] https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/measuring-capital-new-economy

https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/measuring-capital-new-economy

[5] [19] https://storage.fasb.org/BMHO20220622.pdf

https://storage.fasb.org/BMHO20220622.pdf

[6] [23] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2002/1606/oj/eng

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2002/1606/oj/eng

[7] https://www.mof.gov.cn/jrttts/202312/t20231220_3923180.htm

https://www.mof.gov.cn/jrttts/202312/t20231220_3923180.htm

[8] [40] [42] [43] [44] https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar25/index.html

https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar25/index.html

[9] https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/meetings/2025/february/iasb/ap17a-update-on-feedback.pdf

https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/meetings/2025/february/iasb/ap17a-update-on-feedback.pdf

[10] [34] [35] IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement

https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ifrs-13-fair-value-measurement/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[11] https://minfin.gov.ru/ru/document/?id_4=136833-novoe_v_bukhgalterskom_zakonodatelstve_fakty_i_kommentarii

https://minfin.gov.ru/ru/document/?id_4=136833-novoe_v_bukhgalterskom_zakonodatelstve_fakty_i_kommentarii

[15] [66] https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2026/issued/ias38.html

https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2026/issued/ias38.html

[16] IFRS - IAS 38 Intangible Assets

https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ias-38-intangible-assets/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[17] IAS 36 Impairment of Assets

https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ias-36-impairment-of-assets/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[18] https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2026/issued/ifrs3.html

https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2026/issued/ifrs3.html

[20] https://storage.fasb.org/PCC-Topic%202-PublicMtg-20240418.pdf

https://storage.fasb.org/PCC-Topic%202-PublicMtg-20240418.pdf

[21] https://www.fasb.org/page/PageContent?bcpath=tff&pageId=%2Freference-library%2Fsuperseded-standards%2Fsummary-of-statement-no-141-revised-2007.html

https://www.fasb.org/page/PageContent?bcpath=tff&pageId=%2Freference-library%2Fsuperseded-standards%2Fsummary-of-statement-no-141-revised-2007.html

[22] https://www.fasb.org/page/PageContent?isStaticPage=true&pageId=%2Fstaticpages%2Fgoodwill-impairment-testing.html

https://www.fasb.org/page/PageContent?isStaticPage=true&pageId=%2Fstaticpages%2Fgoodwill-impairment-testing.html

[24] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX%3A02013L0034-20211221

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX%3A02013L0034-20211221

[25] https://www.efrag.org/system/files/sites/webpublishing/Meeting%20Documents/2006231244542621/04-02%20Draft%20Discussion%20Paper.pdf

https://www.efrag.org/system/files/sites/webpublishing/Meeting%20Documents/2006231244542621/04-02%20Draft%20Discussion%20Paper.pdf

[26] https://kzp.mof.gov.cn/content.jsp?class_id=01_21&infoid=1626

https://kzp.mof.gov.cn/content.jsp?class_id=01_21&infoid=1626

[27] [52] [65] https://www.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/caijingshidian/renminwang/202308/t20230828_3904233.htm

https://www.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/caijingshidian/renminwang/202308/t20230828_3904233.htm

[28] [61] https://zcpgzx.mof.gov.cn/zcfg/202401/t20240112_3925778.htm

https://zcpgzx.mof.gov.cn/zcfg/202401/t20240112_3925778.htm

[30] IFRS - Intangible Assets

https://www.ifrs.org/projects/work-plan/intangible-assets/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[31] https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2026/issued/ias12.html

https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2026/issued/ias12.html

[32] https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/intangibles

https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/intangibles

[33] https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn28/news/activities_fts/15704623/

https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn28/news/activities_fts/15704623/

[36] https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/gx/en/ivsc/international_valuat/international_valuat_INT/international_valuat_INT/International-Valuation-Standards/Asset-Standards/IVS-210-Intangible-Assets/60_Income_Approach.html

https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/gx/en/ivsc/international_valuat/international_valuat_INT/international_valuat_INT/International-Valuation-Standards/Asset-Standards/IVS-210-Intangible-Assets/60_Income_Approach.html

[37] https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/uk/en/pwc/manual_of_accounting/ifrs/ifrs_INT/ifrs_INT/05_fair_value_ifrs_1_INT/common_areas_of_appl_INT.html

https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/uk/en/pwc/manual_of_accounting/ifrs/ifrs_INT/ifrs_INT/05_fair_value_ifrs_1_INT/common_areas_of_appl_INT.html

[38] IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement

https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2025/issued/ifrs13-ie.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[39] ISO 10668:2010 - Brand valuation

https://www.iso.org/standard/46032.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[41] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/78003/000007800325000017/pfe-12312024xex99.htm

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/78003/000007800325000017/pfe-12312024xex99.htm

[45] https://www.fasb.org/page/PageContent?pageId=%2Fprojects%2Frecently-completed-projects%2Faccounting-for-and-disclosure-of-software-costs.html

https://www.fasb.org/page/PageContent?pageId=%2Fprojects%2Frecently-completed-projects%2Faccounting-for-and-disclosure-of-software-costs.html

[46] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1744489/000174448921000074/R9.htm

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1744489/000174448921000074/R9.htm

[47] https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2026/issued/ifrs6.html

https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2026/issued/ifrs6.html

[48] [58] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0882611015000127

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0882611015000127

[49] [50] https://www.euipo.europa.eu/en/publications/ip-and-innovation-in-european-sectors

https://www.euipo.europa.eu/en/publications/ip-and-innovation-in-european-sectors

[53] https://zcgls.mof.gov.cn/zhengcefabu/202607/P020260717331855291500.pdf

https://zcgls.mof.gov.cn/zhengcefabu/202607/P020260717331855291500.pdf

[54] https://online.rospatent.gov.ru/open-data/open-registers

https://online.rospatent.gov.ru/open-data/open-registers

[55] https://rosnedra.gov.ru/activity/tsifrovizatsiya/perechen_informatsionnykh_sistem_nakhodyashchikhsya_v_vedenii_federalnogo_agentstva_po_nedropolzovan/

https://rosnedra.gov.ru/activity/tsifrovizatsiya/perechen_informatsionnykh_sistem_nakhodyashchikhsya_v_vedenii_federalnogo_agentstva_po_nedropolzovan/

[56] https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-magazine/articles/blockchain-transforming-the-registration-of-ip-rights-and-strengthening-the-protection-of-unregistered-ip-rights-55817

https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-magazine/articles/blockchain-transforming-the-registration-of-ip-rights-and-strengthening-the-protection-of-unregistered-ip-rights-55817

[57] https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-proof

https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-proof

[59] https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2016/12/28/cyberrisk_manu_fullstudy_landscape_brochure_lpxcic07_06_17_7101_finalfor.pdf

https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2016/12/28/cyberrisk_manu_fullstudy_landscape_brochure_lpxcic07_06_17_7101_finalfor.pdf

[60] https://minfin.gov.ru/ru/perfomance/accounting/accounting/standart/positions/

https://minfin.gov.ru/ru/perfomance/accounting/accounting/standart/positions/

[62] IP-backed finance in Europe: state of play and future... - EUIPO

https://www.euipo.europa.eu/en/publications/IP-backed-finance-in-Europe-state-of-play-and-future-perspectives?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[63] https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/document/download/9f5e88ae-eabc-4c44-952c-c09ed2ee8103_en

https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/document/download/9f5e88ae-eabc-4c44-952c-c09ed2ee8103_en

[64] https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202206280008

https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202206280008

[67] IASB launches comprehensive review of accounting for...

https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2024/04/iasb-launches-comprehensive-review-accounting-for-intangibles/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Published files

Analytics · Full published text

Analysis of Russia’s National Balances, 1995–2025

Source Status: Primary Document

Analytical material on long-term changes in key national balances of Russia.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/analiz-natsionalnykh-balansov-rossii-1995-2025

Open on the site

System diagnostics of stocks, flows,

Reproduction and Sustainability

Russia has moved from a deficit of basic stability to a surplus of sovereign reserves, but has not achieved a balanced reproduction of human, technology and fixed assets.

Prepared for: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Data horizon: 1995–2025

Cut Date: 27 August 2026

Moscow • 2026 • version 1.0

Passport document

Table 1. Research framework

ParameterContents
SubjectA connected system of demographic, social, macroeconomic, financial, external, production, technological, resource, infrastructure, territorial and environmental balances.
Period1995–2025; earlier values are given only as a base. Data for the year 2025 are final or preliminary as of the cut-off date.
Unit of analysisStock → tributaries → Reproduction → Usage → Outflow → Losses → Commitments.
PurposeStrategic diagnostics: where the margin of stability has already been created, where the flow worsens, and where the reproduction mechanism itself is broken.
Status of evaluationsStatistical facts are separated from expert synthetic estimates. The color matrix is not an official government index.

How to read the conclusions The surplus of a separate contour is not equal to the stability of the entire system. For example, an export or budget reserve may coexist with demographic deficits, fund depreciation, and technological dependence.

Constraints on comparability

  • The territorial base has changed; after 2014 and 2022, the long ranks of the population and regional indicators require separate marking.
  • Transitions between OKVED classifiers, revisions of national accounts, labour force surveys and poverty methodologies form series gaps.
  • After 2022, the detailing of part of foreign trade and industry statistics is limited; where there is no full range, aggregates of the Bank of Russia and Rosstat are used.
  • Costs are not directly compared without deflation; priority is given to real indices, GDP shares and physical volumes.

Summary for decision

Russia’s thirty-year trajectory is not a linear path from crisis to sustainability, but a change of type of imbalance. V 1990- liquidity and institutional deficits dominated 2000e) recovery based on unloaded capacity and export rent 2010-e - deceleration under already established reserves 2020e) forced structural adaptation, accompanied by a shortage of labor, capital and technology.

Twelve Conclusions

  • The sovereign balance is stronger. The state’s low debt burden, international reserves and a steadily positive commodity balance create protection against the classical payment crisis of the 1990s.
  • The growth rate has become weaker than the quality of stocks. Real GDP growth of almost two times 1999–2008 The average rate of change is about 1% in 2014–2019 years; in 2025 The growth slowed to 1,0%.
  • Financial stability is becoming increasingly difficult to convert into investment flows. In 2025, the economy as a whole was a net lender, but non-financial corporations were a net borrower, and the high cost of money held back capacity renewal.
  • Demography has become a major systemic deficit. The number of births in 2024 was about 1,22 million - less than in the mid-1990; the short window of natural equilibrium 2013–2015 closed.
  • The job market is both strong and vulnerable. Unemployment of 2,2% in 2025 means an almost full load of labor supply, but also a chronic shortage of personnel and pressure on the cost of living.
  • The social balance has improved on poverty but not completed on income quality. The proportion of the population below the poverty line has decreased from 29,0% in 2000 to 6,7% in 2025; the gap by region and group remains significant.
  • The scientific and technological contour does not reproduce the scale. Research and development staff has declined by about 1,06 Millions of people in 1995 the Year 676 thousands in 2024 year, and the costs remain 1% GDP.
  • Fixed assets are a hidden liability. Average wear and tear reached 42,3% in 2024; in a number of infrastructure and utility systems it is higher.
  • Energy and food balances are physically sustainable, but the value of exports depends on processing depth, logistics, and access to technology.
  • The territorial balance is not balanced. The concentration of people, income, investment and scientific personnel in several agglomerations increases the outflow from peripheral regions.
  • Environmental balance remains negative for waste accumulation and local wear and tear of natural systems. Mass of production and consumption waste in 2024 The year - about 8,5 billion tons.
  • The main task of 2026–2035 is to switch policy from the protection of stocks to the reproduction of flows: people, competencies, fixed capital, technologies, soils, water and ecosystems.

The formula of the era of a strong balance of stocks is a tight balance of flows. The solution is not to spend the reserves as such, but to turn them into productivity, human capital and a longer asset life cycle.

Table 2. Summary Status Bar

ContourStatus 2025What HoldsThe main gap
DemographyCriticalMigration inflows, large generations of older peopleLow birth rate, ageing, regional outflow
MacroeconomicsUnstableFull load of labor and capacity, budget demandGrowth 1,0%, high inflation sensitivity
Budget and DebtTensePublic debt about 15% GDP, NWFDeficit of 2025, dependence of income on commodity conditions
Money and FinanceTenseCapital of banks, savings of the populationAverage key rate 19,2% in 2025 year
ExternalResilient with reservationsSurplus of goods and current account, reservesNarrowing surpluses, asset restrictions and settlements
Work and incomeUnstableLow unemployment, rising wagesShortage of staff, productivity, income inequality
Science and technologyTenseSchools and the Demand for LocalizationR&D about 1% GDP, staff reduction
Energy and resourcesResilient with reservationsScale of stocks and productionDepth of processing, logistics, carbon risks
FoodSteadyIncreased productivity and exportsSeeds, machinery, climate volatility
InfrastructureUnstableHigh housing input, new corridorsNetwork wear, bottlenecks, maintenance
TerritoriesTenseAgglomeration effects, supporting citiesConcentration of capital and demographic polarization
EcologyTenseNatural capital, environmental programsWaste, water, air, accumulated damage

Source: Expert synthetic evaluation of the author based on official series; not official index.

Contents

1. Method of national balances

2. Thirty Years: Six Regimes

3. Production, investment and productivity

4. Budget, money and financial flows

5. External balance

6. The demographic balance

7. Labor, income and human capital

8. Industry, technology and science

9. Energy and material balance

10. Food, land and water

11. Infrastructure and housing

12. Territorial balance

13. Ecology and climate

14. Integrated matrix

15. Scripts 2026–2035

16. Strategic agenda

Conclusion

Annex A. Passports of indicators

Annex B. Methodological reservations

Sources

All sections form one causal chain: demography determines the supply of labor; productivity and capital - output; budget and external position - the space of maneuver; technology, infrastructure and ecology - the duration of this maneuver.

1. Method of national balances

Balance is not just accounting equality. For strategic analysis, it shows whether the circuit is able to maintain its stock without constantly increasing hidden liabilities. GDP can grow with a reduction in population; the budget can be surplus with accelerated network wear; exports - high with the loss of technological depth. Therefore, the assessment is built simultaneously in stock, flow and reproduction.

Basic Equality Balance = Reserves + The tributaries + Reproduction − Consumption − Ottoki − Losses − Commitments.

Table 3. Six dimensions of each balance

MeasurementQuestionExample of indicatorRisk signal
StockWhat is already accumulated?Population, capital, reserves, soils, infrastructureDecrease in volume or quality
StreamWhat comes in and out every year?Births and deaths, investments and disposals, exports and importsSustained negative net flow
ReproductionIs the stock updated?TFR, training, commissioning, R&DUpdate below disposal
CapacityWhat is the safe load limit?Availability of labor, network, budget rule, water stressApproaching physical limitation
QualityHow much stock is produced?OPG, productivity, processing depthIncrease in quantity when impact falls
ReserveHow long does the shock last?Liquidity, NWF, capacity, grain reservesCoverage below the reaction horizon

Rules of interpretation

  • A positive flow is considered stable only if the quality of the stock is maintained.
  • One-time shock is separated from the structural trend: the crisis of 2009 is an external shock, the demographic decline after 2016 is a structural process.
  • Stock and liability are counted together: the introduction of housing without utility capacity increases the future load; mining without reclamation is an environmental debt.
  • The national average does not replace the territorial distribution: the surplus of vacancies in one agglomeration does not compensate for the outflow in another territory.
  • Target corridors are defined as management guidelines, not a point forecast.

2. Thirty Years: Six Regimes

The main mistake of long analysis is to consider 1995–2025 years as a single statistical series. During this time, institutions, currency regime, ownership structure, demographic base, trade geography and the scale of state participation have changed. It is more useful to see six regimes, each of which has solved one group of deficits and formed the next.

Table 4. Periodization by type of imbalance

PeriodDominant regimeWhat is restoredWhat is Accumulated as Risk
1995–1999Liquidity and Institutions CrisisMarket prices, private sector, household adaptabilityPoverty, non-payment, debt, demographic shock, wear and tear
2000–2008Recovery growth and resource supercycleRevenues, budget, reserves, capacity utilizationRaw material concentration, lag in investment in quality
2009–2013Anti-crisis stabilization and plateauBanking stability, social spending, low unemploymentSlowing productivity, the beginning of a demographic turnaround
2014–2019Sovereignization and adaptationFloating rate, import substitution in agriculture and financeInvestment pause, technology, real income
2020–2021Pandemic shockDigital services, operational budget supportMortality, educational losses, logistical gaps
2022–2025Forced structural turnNew markets and calculations, defense-industrial loading, employmentInflation, expensive capital, staffing deficit, infrastructure bottlenecks

The Meaning of Transition

In 1990, the task was to stop the collapse of the payment circuit. In 2000, the main resource of growth was the utilization of already created capacities against the background of favorable export prices. By 2012–2013, this reserve was exhausted: further growth required new capital, technology, and productivity, not just demand.

After 2014, the stability of the exchange rate, banks and the budget has become more important than the speed of growth. This reduced the likelihood of a classic systemic crisis, but cemented the gap between fiscal prudence and real renewal. The period of 2022–2024 temporarily raised output due to strong state demand and full load factors; 2025 showed a limitation of this model - an increase of 1,0% under still tight monetary conditions.

3. Production, investment and productivity

Gross output has increased, but the structure of the sources of growth has changed. At the beginning of the 2000s, free capacities, cheap labor, strengthening of payment discipline and export demand simultaneously worked. In the 2020s, additional output increasingly requires scarce workers, expensive credit, parallel infrastructure, and technological replacement.

Figure 1. Annual real GDP rate, 1995–2025

Source: Rosstat, chain indices of the volume of GDP; 2024–2025 - current revisions as of the cut date.

Table 5. Changing the growth regime

IntervalChanges in real GDPAverage annual rateMechanism
1999–2008near +95%about 6,9%Recovery of loading, commodity cycle, growth of income and credit
2009–2013near +17%about 3,2%Post-crisis recovery, then deceleration
2014–2019near +6%about 0,9%Adaptation with weak investments and productivity
2020–2025near +13%about 2,0%Pandemic failure, recovery and fiscal-industrial momentum

Source: Rosstat: National Accounts

The investment gap

Nominal GDP has increased since 7,3 trillion Rubles in 2000 the Year 202,3 trillion Rubles in 2024 This is a combination of real growth, inflation and changes in price proportions. For the capital balance, the ratio of investments to disposal and the quality of new assets are more important. Average depreciation of fixed assets 42,3% in 2024 A significant portion of gross investment serves replacement, not net expansion.

Low unemployment no longer allows growth mainly through increased employment. A steady pace above 2% requires output growth per hour, downtime reduction, robotization, better management, and the movement of capital from low-performance to high-performance applications.

A balance trap occurs when a budget stimulates demand faster than capacity expands. Then the additional demand manifests itself in prices, imports or lengthening deadlines, and the central bank raises the cost of capital. It was this ligament that became visible in 2024–2025.

The problem is not the lack of aggregate demand as such, but the limited elasticity of supply: people, equipment, logistics and technology do not have time to respond to the impulse.

4. Budget, money and financial flows

The financial contour of Russia has become fundamentally more stable than the 1990s: public debt is small, banks are better capitalized, the exchange rate serves as a shock absorber. But in 2025, tensions shifted from solvency to the price of capital and the structure of sectoral flows.

Table 6. Financial Panel 2025

Indicator 2025ValueBalance meaning
GDP growth1,0%Cooling after high rates of 2023–2024
Inflation, December by December5,59%Above target but below peak pressure of 2024
Average key rate19,2%High cost of refinancing and investment
Key rate at the end of year16,0%Beginning of mitigation while maintaining rigidity
Deficit of the federal budget5,645 trillion rub.Demand supported by budget reserve reduction
Liquid part of the NWF at 01.01.20264,085 trillion rub.Reserve is maintained, but its function becomes more selective
Public debtabout 15% GDPLow level by international standards
International reserves at the end of the year754,9 billion Annex II USAGross stock is high, but some assets are limited; the growth of 2025 is largely due to the revaluation of gold

Source: Bank of Russia; Minfin Russia. Values are rounded.

Sectoral Balances

Table 7. Financial accounts by sector, 2025

SectorNet lending (+) / borrowing (−)% of GDPInterpretation
Economy in general+3,3 trillion rub.+1,5%The country remains a net creditor to the outside world
Households+13,2 trillion rub.+6,2%Savings and financial reserve are high
Financial organizations+2,5 trillion rub.+1,2%The financial sector accumulates resources
Non-financial corporations−7,4 trillion rub.−3,4%Investments and working capital require financing
Public administration−5,0 trillion rub.−2,3%Budget impulse compensates for part of private demand gap

Source: Bank of Russia: financial accounts and balance sheets of financial assets

Household savings are a protective reserve, but their concentration on deposits does not guarantee conversion to long-term capital. This requires tools with understandable risk, inflation protection and binding to renewal projects.

Low public debt provides room for manoeuvre, but does not remove supply constraints. A loan is justified if it finances an asset with returns above the cost of service and does not fix fixed costs without a permanent source of income.

The monetary balance will remain tight as budget demand, wages and credit grow faster than capacity. Therefore, anti-inflationary policies should include not only the rate, but also the accelerated removal of physical bottlenecks.

5. External balance

The external contour remains one of the strongest: exports of goods exceed imports, the current account is positive, external debt is controlled. However, the quality of the balance sheet has changed - some reserve assets are limited, calculations and logistics are more expensive, the geography of trade is already, and the surplus of 2025 is less than the previous one.

Figure 2. Trade balance and current account, 2023–2025

Source: Bank of Russia, balance of payments estimate; USD billion Annex II

Table 8. Transformation of the external circuit

Component199020002014–20212022–2025
Currency regimeVulnerable corridor and crisisManaged strengtheningFloating rate and budget ruleFlow control and new design contours
ReservesInadequateRapid accumulationHigh stockHigh gross margin, but limited availability of some assets
TradeRaw materials surplusPrice and volume increaseThe Turn to AsiaForced reorientation and increased logistics costs
CapitalLarge outflow and debtAccumulation of external assetsDeleveringFragmentation of capital markets

What hides the surplus

  • A positive current account may reflect not only competitiveness, but also limited imports of equipment and services.
  • The growth of external assets is not equal to the available reserve if the rights of disposal and settlement infrastructure change.
  • Export earnings create sustainability only when they finance domestic accumulation of productive capital.
  • Concentration on several products and markets increases sensitivity to price, discount, freight and sanction risk.

Not to maximize gross exports, but to increase net value per unit of resource: processing, service, intellectual component, reliability of calculations and diversification of routes.

6. The demographic balance

Demography is the contour with the longest lag and the least possibility of quick compensation. A child who is not born today will not enter the labor market in twenty years; a lost healthy life expectancy reduces the supply of labor right now. Therefore, the demographic deficit cannot be closed only by short-term migration.

Figure 3. Births and deaths, selected years 1995–2024

Source: Rosstat, natural population movement. Values are rounded; territorial changes require caution.

Table 9. Reference demographics

Indicator19952000201320192024/2025Trend
Population, million148,3146,3143,3146,8146,028 to 01.01.2025Decline; some broken by land change
Born, million1,361,271,901,481,22 (2024)After 2015, steady decline
The dead, millions2,202,231,871,801,82 (2024)Pandemic peak passed, but the gap remains
Total fertility rateabout 1,34about 1,201,711,50about 1,4Below simple reproduction
Life expectancy, years64,5265,3470,873,372,84 (2024)Long-term growth with shocks

Source: Rosstat: demography

Three different deficits

  1. Deficit of birth. Smaller generations enter reproductive age; even an increase in fertility per woman does not immediately increase the total number of births.
  2. Deficit of healthy years of life. Mortality of working age, chronic diseases and unequal access to prevention reduce the real supply of labor.
  3. Deficit of territorial consolidation. Young and skilled people are concentrated in the largest agglomerations, leaving the periphery with an aging structure and expensive infrastructure per capita.

What changes the trajectory

Cash payment by itself rarely overcomes the total barrier. The decision of the family depends on the availability of housing, stability of employment, kindergartens, medical care, time for care, transport accessibility and confidence in the future. The policy should be assessed at the full cost of the child’s birth and upbringing for the household.

Migration is necessary to smooth out the supply of labor, but its balance is determined not only by the number of arrivals. Important are age, qualifications, language skills, tax legalization, family integration and regional distribution. We need a selective long-term model, not just closing vacancies.

No economic scenario of 2035 is sustainable without a separate balance of population: birth, mortality, healthy life expectancy, migration and territorial permanence should be taken into account together.

7. Labor, income and human capital

The social result of the last 30 years is contradictory: mass poverty 1990 has sharply decreased, the real availability of goods and services has increased, unemployment has reached a historic low. At the same time, there was a shortage of workers, income inequality and access to quality services remain, and wage growth outpaces productivity in scarce segments.

Figure 4. Proportion of population below poverty line, years selected

Source: Rosstat. Since 2021, a new poverty line methodology has been applied; direct comparison requires a reservation.

Table 10. Human capital as flow, not expenditure

BalanceAchievementsThe new vulnerabilityMonitoring indicator
EmploymentUnemployment 2,2% in 2025Staff shortages, overloading and turnoverVacancies, hours, productivity per hour
RevenuesPoverty reduction to 6,7%Cost of living and median income gapMedian real disposable income
HealthOPG growth relative to 1990-xRegional gap and chronic diseasesHealthy life expectancy and preventable mortality
EducationHigh coverage and digitalizationDeficit of engineering, workers and teachersEmployment by specialty, quality of skills
Housing and familyRecord housing commissioningAvailability, mortgage load, infrastructurePrice/income, payment/income, places in social infrastructure

Transition from Employment to Productivity

With almost full employment, additional output cannot be sustainably obtained through a constant lengthening of working hours. Organizational innovation, technology, retraining and mobility are needed. The critical indicator is not the number of employees by itself, but the output and quality per healthy working hour.

The education system should be assessed by the balance of competencies: how many specialists are trained, how many are entrenched in the profession and the region, how quickly the skills become obsolete, what is the demand of enterprises. Ordering without responsibility for employment generates a formal issue and a real deficit.

Poverty reduction is an important success, but the threshold is insufficient. For the reproduction of the family, the median income after mandatory payments, the cost of housing and childcare, the availability of medicine, as well as the household reserve in case of loss of income are important.

8. Industry, technology and science

The industrial circuit in 2022–2024 showed a high ability to mobilize and replace supplies. However, the loading of existing lines and the expansion of individual industries are not equal to technological reproduction. Its criterion is the ability to independently design, produce, maintain and next iteration to improve critical systems.

Figure 5. R&D staff and internal research costs

Source: Rosstat; NRU HSE according to Rosstat. Values for individual years are rounded.

Table 11. Ladder of technological reproduction

LevelWhat is considered a stockWhat is considered reproductionCritical gap
ScienceSchools, laboratories, researchersPostgraduate studies, instrument base, publications and resultsStaffing reduction and ageing infrastructure
EngineeringKB, standards, project competenciesSerial design and testingGap between prototype and series
ProductionLines, machine tools, tooling, suppliersUpdating equipment and qualityComponents, machine tools, metrology
MarketCustomers and sales channelsLong demand for domestic solutionsPilots without scaling
Data and SoftwareModels, platforms, calculationsUpdate, cyber-resilience, feedbackFragmentation and dependence on closed stacks

V 2024 The internal costs of research and development, taking into account small businesses, were estimated at approximately 1,94 trillion rupees, or 0,97% GDP. This is significantly lower than the national benchmark of at least 2% GDP to 2030 year. Not only the amount, but also the share of entrepreneurial financing, competitiveness, measurable impact and sustainability of teams are important.

The number of domestic applications for inventions in 2024 increased to 41,4 thousand. A patent is an intermediate result. The balance sheet should track the share of developments that have reached the pilot, series, export and re-order.

Technological sovereignty should be interpreted as managed interdependence: critical functions should have domestic replacement and maintainability, and non-critical ones should be connected to global chains on a diversified basis.

Target 2030 No less than 2% GDP on R&D makes sense only together with an increase in the number of sustainable research teams, serial implementations and private co-financing. Otherwise, the consumption increases, but the system does not reproduce.

9. Energy and material balance

Russia has a large physical reserve and sustainable energy production. The restriction is not so much in the volume of raw materials, but in the cost of production, processing quality, logistics, equipment and environmental obligations. It is not gross tonnage that is important for the strategy, but the net value added per unit of extracted resource.

Figure 6. Index of physical output of oil, coal and electricity

Source: Rosstat; the Ministry of Energy of Russia. 1995 = 100; Values for 2025 Preliminary/operational year.

Table 12. Physical reference rows

Indicator19952000200820192025Balanced Output
Oil, million tonsabout 307324488561511,5High level but below peak; recycling and markets are important
Coal, million tonsabout 263258329442about 440Growth rests on Eastern logistics and demand
Electricity, billion KW·habout 8608771 040about 1 1141 183,9Demand is growing; network and generating reserve is needed

Source: Ministry of Energy of Russia: results of 2025

Five levels of resource efficiency

  • recovery with minimal losses and accidents;
  • depth of processing and product quality;
  • energy efficiency of its own production;
  • Logistic cost and market diversification;
  • Closing the environmental obligation: recycling, reclamation, water and emissions.

Electricity is becoming the infrastructure of the new industrial cycle. Data centers, transport electrification, mining projects and new productions increase the load unevenly across territories. The overall power surplus can coexist with local network and connectivity deficits.

Material balance must take into account critical minerals and components. The presence of ore does not mean the presence of reagents, enrichment, clean materials, equipment and a certified final product. Therefore, the passports of chains are needed by functions, not only by types of raw materials.

10. Food, land and water

The agro-food circuit is one of the most notable adaptation successes. Grain yields, meat production, and food exports are well above the levels of the 1990s. But sustainability depends on seeds, breeding material, machinery, protections, soil fertility, water, and the transport chain.

Table 13. Food balance in dynamics

Indicator1995200020082022–2024Meaning
Grain, million tons63,465,4108,2Mostly 126–158Export stock has increased, but the harvest is volatile
MeatDeep decline in productionBeginning of recoveryRapid growth of poultry and porkSurplus by several categoriesImport substitution has become systemic
Fish and aquatic bioresourcesHigh natural potentialExport of raw materialsFleet modernization has begunGrowth of processing is unevenNeed a great depth of processing
Land and soilsLarge reserve areaUnderinvestmentIntensificationIncreased load and climate risksFertility is a slow capital

Source: Rosstat: historical data on grain harvest

The new frontier of sustainability

Physical self-sufficiency does not close technological dependences. Seeds, genetics, veterinary medicines, agricultural machinery, software management and refrigeration logistics should be evaluated as part of the same chain.

Land is a renewable resource only when fertility is reproduced. The balance of humus, erosion, acidity, reclamation and return of organic matter should enter the project economy as well as fuel and fertilizer.

Water is a territorial resource, not a national average. The national runoff surplus does not exclude a shortage of quality water, pollution of the basin, or a lack of infrastructure in a specific production area.

Food exports are sustainable if domestic prices, soil quality, seed and machine circuits remain within the target range. Gross revenue should not be financed by the depletion of natural capital.

11. Infrastructure and housing

Infrastructure connects all other balances: without the network, industrial capacity is not realized, without transport - resource and food surplus, without utility systems - housing, without communication - territorial availability of services. Its main risk is the invisible gap between new construction and maintenance of the existing fund.

Table 14. Infrastructure balance of the life cycle

ContourPositive FlowAccrued liabilityEarly warning indicator
Housing107,8 million m² entered in 2024 the YearAvailability, mortgage load, social facilitiesPayment/revenue; introduction of networks 1 m²
UtilitiesModernization programsHigh wear and lossAccidents, loss of water and heat, replacement period
RailwaysGrowth of Eastern Transportationbottlenecks of approaches and portsTurnover time, transportation refusal, speed
HighwaysNew highways and repairsRegional and municipal networkNormative share, life cycle cost
Power GridNew connectionsLocal Deficit and AgeingConnection period, SAIDI/SAIFI, loss
Digital networkAbout 90% households have access to the InternetQuality and sustainability gapSpeed, fault tolerance, availability in small settlements

Source: Rosstat: housing construction 2024

Average depreciation of fixed assets 42,3% in 2024 year - a signal that the volume of input cannot be estimated without disposal and repair. Every infrastructure program needs a full life cycle: construction, connection, operation, repair and dismantling.

Record housing starts do not guarantee a better housing balance if the price and mortgage payment grow faster than income, and new areas are not provided with jobs, schools, clinics and transport.

The eastern turn of trade enhances the strategic value of railways, ports, border crossings and the Northern Sea Route. But the choice of the project should take into account not only gross tonnage, but an increase in value added and reliability of the entire chain.

The new facility should be tested on four balances: demand for capacity, availability of personnel, maintenance cost and environmental liability. Otherwise, the input turns into a future budget deficit.

12. Territorial balance

The average in Russia hides several different economies: the largest agglomerations with a shortage of land and people; resource regions with high revenues and narrow specialization; old industrial areas with wear and tear; agricultural zones; small towns and remote settlements with high cost of basic services. The universal measure has a different effect.

Table 15. Different models of territorial balance

Type of territoryPrimary stockThe main deficitApproach
Large agglomerationPeople, markets, universities, capitalHousing, transport, time, ecologyIncreasing density without loss of environmental quality
Resource regionExtraction and export revenueDiversification, personnel, servicesChains localization and future generations fund
Old IndustrialCompetences and infrastructureUpdating of funds and ecologyReengineering of sites, clean production
AgrarianLand, food, settlementsRevenues, processing, logisticsRecycling clusters and basic services
Small/remoteTerritory, natural and cultural capitalAvailability of services and connectivitySupport centers, mobile and digital services
Border/corridorLogistics and Trading PositionRisks and capacityReliability of transitions, security, service

From equalization of costs to equalization of opportunities

Inter-budget transfers hold the minimum level of services, but do not automatically create an economic base. The territorial balance should measure the availability of work, education, medicine, and transportation hubs in a reasonable time, not just per capita budget expenditures.

A reference point is effective if a real accessibility zone is formed around it. For each service, you need to choose a physical, mobile or digital form and take into account the reliability of communication, transport schedule and age structure of the population.

The decision on the location of production should be checked by the balance of water, energy, personnel, housing and logistics. The tax relief does not compensate for the systemic deficit of these five resources.

13. Ecology and climate

The ecological contour is often considered an external prohibition, although it is essentially a balance sheet of natural capital and future liabilities. Pollution, waste, soil degradation and climate damage first increase output through an unpaid resource, and then return through health, accidents, insurance, export barriers and fiscal reclamation.

Table 16. Environmental balance as a commitment

Flow/stockStateWhy the average is misleadingWhat to consider
WasteAbout 8,5 billion T in 2024 The year, mostly wasteMass is not equal to toxicity, but shows the scale of material flowEducation, use, burial, accumulated object
AirDecline in part of the cities, local hearths remainRisk is concentrated by agglomerations and industrial nodesPopulation exposure and days of excess
WaterLarge national resource, uneven qualityLack and pollution of swimming poolsFence, Reset, Quality, Reuse
ForestsLargest stock, fires and illegal trafficArea is not equal to absorption and qualityGrowth, felling, death, recovery, carbon
ClimateTemperature rise above world averageThe effects are different: permafrost, heat, fires, waterDamage to assets, adaptation, insurance coverage

Source: Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia: state report

The circular economy

For mining and metallurgical chains, the main potential is the reuse of overburden, slag, ash, scrap metal and water. But recycling should not be a formal change in the waste code: you need a confirmed product, a market and no risk transfer.

For solid municipal waste, the priority is to prevent formation, separate collection, sorting, reuse and only then energy disposal or disposal. The target should not take into account the capacity of the facility, but the actual reduction of the burial.

Adaptation to climate change is no longer a distant future. Permafrost infrastructure, southern agriculture, forest regions and large cities need physical risk maps included in the cost of capital and insurance.

The natural resource balance is not free. If restoration, monitoring and future liquidation are not included in the project price, the system accumulates environmental debt outside the balance sheet.

14. Integrated matrix

The matrix reduces 13 contours to a single logic. Green status means that the stock and current flow are generally stable; yellow - the stock is still sufficient, but reproduction is weakening; orange - negative flow requires a reversal of policy; red - the deficit already limits other contours. The assessment is expert and is intended for prioritization, not for statistical ranking.

Figure 7. Expert map of national balances by stages

Source: synthesis of official data of Rosstat, the Bank of Russia, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Energy and the Ministry of Environment. Not an official index.

Table 17. Imbalance Transmission Channels

Causal ligamentPrimary DeficitTransmissionThe final effect
Demography → labor → inflationFew employees and healthy hoursSalaries are growing faster than releaseIncreased costs and a hard rate
Rate → investments → fundsExpensive long capitalPostponement of updates and repairsWear, accidents, poor performance
Technology → import → external accountNo component/serviceCostly round-trip importsReduction of net export rent
Infrastructure → area → demographicsNo availability of services and marketThe outflow of youthAging and rising costs of services
Ecology → health → workPollution and climate riskDiseases, downtime, damage to assetsReduction of output and budget growth

Major inconsistencies 2025

  • Household financial savings are large, but long production capital is expensive.
  • Unemployment is minimal, but productivity and automation do not close the personnel gap.
  • The external surplus remains, but access to technological imports and part of the assets is limited.
  • Housing is record-breaking, but the family’s demographic decision depends on affordability and infrastructure, not meters on average.
  • Resource output is high, but recycling, logistics, and environmental closure determine net worth.
  • Public debt is low, but the hidden obligation of worn-out funds is great.

15. Scripts 2026–2035

Scenarios are not forecasts. These are three logically agreed upon sets of solutions and consequences. The real trajectory can combine their elements, but the choice of priorities should be clear: what stocks are spent, what flows are strengthened and what commitments are made.

Table 18. Scenario fork

ParameterA. Inertial adaptationB. Investment MobilizationB. Regenerative balance
LogicPreserve current institutions and respond to shocksAccelerate the release through a large state orderLinking investment to the reproduction of people, capital and ecosystems
GrowthAbout 1–2% on averageHigher at the beginning, then the risk of overheating2,5–3,5% as a target corridor for productivity growth
Inflation/rateSlow declinePressure due to supply constraintsReduction through capacity expansion and demand coordination
DemographyContinuation of natural lossWork is replaced by migration and workloadFamily infrastructure, health, selective migration
CapitalWear is reduced slowlyQuick entry, risk of expensive maintenanceLife cycle, performance and maintainability
TechnologyPoint import substitutionPriority of critical industriesPlatforms, serialization, private co-financing, export
EcologyPost-facto compensationRisk of secondary environmental objectivesCommitment included in project and capital price
The main riskSlow depletion of stockInflation and ineffective capexDifficulty coordinating and measuring results

Target corridors of scenario B

Table 19. Management guidelines, not a point forecast

IndicatorBaseReference 2030Reference 2035Condition
Real GDP+1,0% in 20252,5–3,5% per yearnot less than 3% trendingProductivity and investment without overheating
Inflation5,59% Dec/Decabout 4%about 4%Harmonization of budget and supply capacity
R & D0,97% GDP in 2024not less than 2% GDP2,5% GDPGrowth of teams, private funding and implementation
Depreciation of fixed assets42,3% to 2024Below 40%35–38%Disposal and repair are considered together with the input
Poverty6,7% to 2025Below 7%Below 5%Median income and targeting
OPGabout 73 years78 years79–80 yearsHealthy years and prevention
TFRabout 1,41,61,7+Full family infrastructure

Source: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 309 from 07.05.2024 and expert corridors

Triggers of revision

  • Inflation is consistently higher 6% With a lower output growth 2% — Lack of supply, not just demand.
  • The liquid part of the reserves covers less than two years of stress deficit - a prioritization of obligations is required.
  • Investments are growing, and depreciation is not reduced for three years - input does not compensate for disposal or the quality of accounting is not enough.
  • The number of births and healthy life expectancy at the same time worsens two years - demographic policy is transferred to the priority program.
  • The share of serial implementations does not grow with an increase in R&D - financing is redistributed from the process to a proven transition to production.

16. Strategic agenda

We do not need another sum of sectoral programs, but a mechanism for coordinating balance sheets. Each major measure should show what stock it creates, what flow changes, what commitment it makes and what neighboring contour can limit the result.

Table 20. Portfolio of priority decisions

PriorityJudgement 2026–2028Key resultHorizon
1. Unified system of balancesNational Register of Stocks, Flows and Obligations with Data PassportsQuarterly Early Warning Panel12–18 months
2. Demographic reproductionPackage "Housing + care + health + time + employment" by family typeReducing the full cost of birth and upbringing3–10 years
3. ProductivityAutomation and Organizational Transformation Fund for SMEs and IndustryRelease by one hour and release of scarce labor2–5 years
4. Fixed capitalLife cycle passports of networks and production assetsDecreases with input3–10 years
5. Technology ChainsMaps of critical functions: design-component-service-seriesSerial repairable domestic function2–8 years
6. Long MoneySavings tools tied to proven infrastructure and industrial projectsSome of the excess liquidity becomes capital2–5 years
7. Territorial connectivityStandards for accessibility of services and reference centresReducing forced migration and access time3–8 years
8. Environmental closureReserving the cost of liquidation and restoration in the projectReduction of accumulated environmental debt2–10 years

Digital contour "EQUILIBRIUM - Balances of Russia"

The digital system should not be a showcase of indicators, but a decision-checking machine. Its core is a linked graph of stocks, flows, constraints and liabilities, where each value has a source, date, methodology and level of uncertainty.

The first pilot should be built on three end-to-end chains: “demography-labor-housing”, “investments-funds-energy network” and “resources-refining-logistics-ecological closure”. They cover the main human, capital and natural obligation deficits.

Table 21. Digital contour architecture

ModuleFunctionWithdrawal
DATAVersioning of official series, breaks of methods and territoriesChecked passport indicator
BALANCECalculation of reserves, inflows, disposals, reserves and liabilitiesBalance and time to threshold
STRESSShock prices, rates, demography, logistics and climateVulnerability and Cascade Map
SCENARIOComparison of solution packages and lagsResult corridor and error price
PORTFOLIOPrioritization of projects on several balancesPriority, funding, benchmarks
AUDITFixing source, assumption, owner and revisionDecision trail and independent verification

Integration Pilot Projects ECO-PPA the " World Cup "SPECZASHCHITA" can be connected as application contours of verification of environmental obligation, power supply and security of critical infrastructure - after unification of indicators and rules of verification.

Organizational model

  • a small methodology centre responsible for definitions, data quality and inter-contour linkages;
  • owners of each balance in the relevant departments and development institutions;
  • an independent scientific and expert board to verify assumptions and scenarios;
  • open layer of aggregated data and protected layer of project/sensitive information;
  • Annual national report and quarterly panel of early signals.

Conclusion

Over thirty years, Russia has created what it lacked in the 1990s: the state’s ability to meet its payment obligations, a reserve framework, competitive export industries, a food production base, low unemployment and the capacity to adapt institutions rapidly. This is a real stock of resilience.

But the next task is another type. A currency reserve does not replace a child, an engineering school, a good network, fertile soil, or serial technology. These assets are reproduced slowly, require harmonization and do not arise automatically from the current surplus.

Therefore, the criterion of success of 2026–2035 years is not a maximum of a single indicator, but joint sustainability: growth without accelerating inflation; employment without depletion of people; exports without technological impoverishment; construction without accumulation of wear and tear; extraction without environmental debt; territory without forced outflow.

The main managerial transition is from reaction to deficits to reproduction design. The national balance sheet should become a constant cycle: measure the stock, see the flow, check the limit, select the portfolio, fix the obligation and revise the decision on the fact.

Final formula of sovereignty XXI The ability to not only withstand the shock, but also to reproduce people, knowledge, capital, infrastructure and the natural environment faster than they leave.

Annex A. Passports of indicators

Below is the minimum set for the working panel. Each indicator should be stored with a version, territory, unit, frequency, source, revision technique and uncertainty interval.

Table A1. Minimum passports 13 balance sheets

ContourStockStreamStress indicatorTarget corridor
DemographyNumber, age, healthy OPGBirths, deaths, migrationSCR; natural balanceTFR ≥1,6; OPG 78
Human capitalHealthy years, competencesRelease, retraining, loss of skillsPreventable mortality; employmentGrowth of healthy OPG; >75% Fixation
Work and incomeLabour force, household reservesHours, Salaries, Taxes, TransfersProductivity/hour; median incomeProductivity ≥2%/year
MacroeconomicsProduction capitalRelease, investment, disposalPotential growth; output gapTrend 2,5–3,5%
Budget and DebtFNB, tax base, debtIncome, expenditure, borrowingStructural surplus; maintenanceDebt <25% GDP; sustainable primary balance sheet
Money and FinanceSavings, capital of banksCredit, interest, defaultsReal rate; long loanInflation about 4%
ExternalReserves, external assets/debtExports, imports, revenues, capitalAvailable reserve; concentrationPositive account without capital import compression
TechnologyTeams, patents, platforms, equipmentR&D, Pilots, SeriesSeries/pilot; private co-financingR&D ≥2% GDP
Energy and materialsStocks, capacities, networksProduction, processing, lossesValue added/t; network reserveReducing energy intensity ≥2%/year
FoodSoils, seeds, herds, capacitiesCrops, consumption, exportsSelf-sustainment; humus balanceSurplus without soil degradation
InfrastructureNetwork and asset statusInput, repair, accident, disposalDepreciation; life cycle costDepreciation <40% C 2030
TerritoriesPeople, centers, natural capitalMigration, investment, accessibilityTime to service; outflow of youthReducing the Accessibility Gap
EcologyWater, forest, soil, accumulated damageEmissions, discharges, waste, recoveryExposure; secondary; damageReduction of burial and damage

Passport model of a separate indicator

Table A2. Data quality standard

FieldMandatory content
Title and meaningWhat is measured and what decision changes
FormulaNumerator, denominator, deflator, seasonality, sign
Unit and territoryRoubles current/permanent, physical unit, boundaries of territory
Source and VersionOffice, publication, date of download, date of revision
Frequency and lagMonth/quarter/year; delayed publication
Breaks of a seriesClassifier, methodology, census, territory
CorridorNormal, tensile, critical ranges
Owner of the reactionWho is obliged to explain the deviation and propose an action

Annex B. Methodological reservations

Table B1. Where Caution is Especially Important

AreaReservation
National accountsRosstat regularly reviews GDP and its components; the values of 2023–2025 may differ from early publications. Chain indices are used for the rates, not the ratio of nominal volumes.
PricesInflation at December by December is different from the annual average. The rate at the end of the year is different from the average rate for the year.
TerritoryComparability of population, GRP and industry ranks is violated by changes in the composition of the territory and completeness of accounting. Long graphs are used to guide a trend, not an exact decomposition.
DemographyCensus results and administrative records may review population levels. Birth rates depend on the age structure of women.
PovertySince 2021, the poverty line has been calculated according to a new methodology; a methodological gap is noted in the graph.
WorkforceThe age range of employment surveys and classifications has changed. Record-low unemployment does not measure hidden skills deficits.
Fixed assetsThe degree of wear is an accounting indicator; it is not equal to physical accident but is useful as an early indicator.
External sectorAfter 2022, the detail of trade and cross-border transactions is limited; balance of payments data are evaluated and revised.
ScienceR&D and personnel costs depend on the coverage of the organizations; GDP share does not reflect quality and commercialization.
EcologyThe mass of waste is dominated by mining and class V; joint hazard, accumulation and exposure assessment is required for risk.
Synthetic matrixColor status - expert classification based on the direction of the stock, flow and reproduction. It is not an official rating.

Sources

The basis is official publications. Links lead to the pages of departments or files available on the cut date. The data in the text is rounded; if there is a discrepancy, the latest version of the source source takes precedence.

1. Rosstat. National accounts

2. Rosstat. "Intelligible statistics": GDP and accounts

3. Rosstat. Russian Statistical Yearbook

4. Rosstat. "Russia in numbers - 2025"

5. Rosstat. Prices and inflation

6. Rosstat. Demography

7. Rosstat. Historical population

8. Rosstat. Natural population movement, 2024

9. Rosstat. Poverty, preliminary estimate 2025

10. Rosstat. A number of historical poverty

11. Bank of Russia. Balance of payments

12. Bank of Russia. Balance of payments of Russia, 2025

13. Bank of Russia. International reserves

14. Bank of Russia. External debt

15. Bank of Russia. Financial accounts and balances

16. Bank of Russia. Macroeconomic Review, January 2026

17. Minfin Russia. Preliminary execution of the federal budget for 2025

18. Minfin Russia. the National Welfare Fund

19. Minfin Russia. Public debt and debt policy

20. Minfin Russia. Budget forecast up to 2042

21. Rosstat. Science, innovation and technology

22. ISSEZ NIU HSE. R & D expenditure in 2024

23. ISSEZ NIU HSE. Staff and researchers, 2024

24. Rosstat. Historical number of R&D personnel

25. Rospatent. Applications for Inventions 2024

26. Rosstat. Fixed assets

27. Rosstat. Housing construction in 2024

28. Ministry of Energy of Russia. Results of activity for the year 2025

29. Rosstat. Historical range of grain harvest

30. Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia. State report on the state of the environment

31. Rosstat. Environmental protection

32. Ministry of Transport of Russia. Implementation of the Transport Strategy

33. President of Russia. Decree No. 309 on national objectives

End of document

Other published edition: Balances of Russia: from the margin of stability to reproduction Analiz_balansov_Rossii_1995-2025.pptx · web text +

YEARS

STRONG STOCK

1995–2025 • Solutions 2026–2035

STRONG FLOW

System diagnostics of stocks, flows,

Reproduction and Sustainability

Main question 2035:

What is Russia capable of sustainably reproducing?

Prepared for Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Moscow • 2026

≈15% GDP

ANALYTICAL CONCLUSION

Strong stocks - intense reproduction

For 30 years, Russia has closed the deficit of basic payment stability. The new deficit is the ability to renew people, knowledge and basic capital.

ESTABLISHED STABILITY STOCKPILING

Narrow Places of Reproduction

$754,9 billion

1,22 million

42,3%

Public debt

International Reserves

Births in the year 2024

Average depreciation of funds

+$113,2 billion

126–158 mln t

0,97% GDP

676 thousand.

Balance of goods 2025

grain harvest in 2022–2024

R & D costs

R&D staff

The main transition is not to spend stocks, but to turn them into productivity, human capital and a long life cycle of assets.

Each era created the next deficit.

ANALYTICAL CONCLUSION

Thirty years is not a single series, but six regimes with different logics of growth and sustainability.

1995–1999

2000–2008

2009–2013

2014–2019

2020–2021

2022–2025

Liquidity

Rise

Stabilisation

Sovereign

Outline

Pandemic

Structural Turn

Stopped the breakdown of payments

Income and reserves

Banks and employment

Course and import substitution

Digital services

New Markets and Loading

poverty • debt • wear

raw material concentration

the Impact Plateau

investment pause

Mortality • skills

Frames • Rate • Networks

Renovated

Accumulated as a risk

By 2012–2013, the reserve of reloading old capacities had exhausted: further growth requires new capital, technology and productivity.

13 balance sheets: strong shields, weak reproduction

EXPERT DIAGNOSTICS

Color status is an expert classification of the direction of stock, flow and reproduction. This is not an official government index.

Growth has stalled in supply constraints

FACT

KEY SIGNALS

average annual growth 1999–2008

average annual growth 2014–2019

growth in 2025

Growth constraints have shifted from demand to supply: people, equipment, logistics, and technology are scarce.

19,2%

FACT

Savings don’t turn into long capital

Net lending/borrowing sectors in 2025 the Year, trillion roubles

TRANSITION PRICE

Nefin. companies

Public sector

average key rate of 2025

+6,2% GDP

Household balance

−3,4% GDP

Balance of non-financial companies

There is a financial reserve; the bottleneck is the projects being tested, the long horizon and the cost of capital.

External surplus is maintained, but its stock is narrowing

FACT

KEY SIGNALS

+$113,2

billion — balance sheet 2025

+$38,8

billion — current account 2025

current account reduction to 2024

The surplus protects against the classical payment crisis, but does not remove the restrictions of settlements, logistics and technological imports.

Demography has become the main systemic deficit

FACT

KEY SIGNALS

1,22 million

Births in the year 2024

1,82 million

Deaths in the year 2024

Total fertility rate

Demography transfers the restriction further: labor → costs → inflation → rate → investment.

Social progress has reached the labor ceiling

FACT

KEY SIGNALS

29,0%

poverty in the year 2000

preliminary estimate 2025

Unemployment: the labor reserve is exhausted

The next criterion of social balance is not only income, but healthy years, skills, family stability and consolidation of personnel.

The scientific contour has lost scale and seriality

FACT

KEY SIGNALS

R&D staff: 1,061 million → 676 thousands.

0,97%

R&D expenditure to GDP of 2024

41,4 thousand.

Russian Applications for Inventions

The main technological gap is not between the idea and the patent, but between the prototype, series, service and re-order.

Resource surplus requires more added value

FACT

KEY SIGNALS

511,5 mln t

oil in the year 2025

≈440 million tons

coal in 2025

1 183,9

billion kW·h electricity

Physical surpluses become strategic only after recycling, sustainable logistics, and environmental closure.

107,8 million m²

FACT

New entry does not replace asset life cycle

The infrastructure balance should count the input, connection, operation, repair and disposal as one chain.

42,3%

Housing construction in the year 2024

average depreciation of fixed assets

Physical input ≠ Accessibility of housing, networks, transport and services.

Accounting depreciation is an early indicator of liability, but not a direct prediction of failure.

ENTER

CONNECTION

EXPLOITATION

REPAIR

ELECTION

Investment filter: water • energy • frames • housing • logistics • maintenance cost.

Environmental debt is returned through health and budget

FACT

UNENTIFIED COMMITMENT

Today

Production • issue • revenue

billion tons of waste

Accumulation

Waste • Emissions • Degradation

formed in 2024; the bulk is associated with mining

Return

health • downtime • accident • insurance

Payer

enterprise • territory • budget • future generations

Mass ≠ toxicity: in the pilot it is necessary to divide the hazard class, accumulation and exposure of the population.

If monitoring, recovery and liquidation are not included in the project price, the system accumulates debt outside the balance sheet.

Imbalances reinforce each other with a cascade

ANALYTICAL HYPOTHESIS

Causal chains are hypotheses for stress testing, not already proven econometric coefficients.

DEMOGRAPHY

WORK

COSTS

INFLATION

RATE

INVESTMENTS

IZNOS

PRODUCTION

INFRASTRUCTURE

AVAILABILITY

OTTOK

DEMOGRAPHY

Industry KPI optimizes one link. The national balance checks the entire cascade, lags and neighboring constraints.

2,5–3,5%

Scenario analysis

Until 2035, there are three different trajectories

Scenarios are not forecasts. These are logically consistent sets of solutions, consequences and risks.

Inertial adaptation

Investment Mobilization

Regenerative balance

quick start

target growth rate

Speed depends on removing bottlenecks

target growth rate

Respond to shocks within existing institutions

Accelerate the release of a large state order

Linking investment to the reproduction of people, capital and ecosystems

RISK: Slow depletion of stock

RISK: inflation and inefficient capex

RISK: Difficulty in coordination and measurement

Recommended frame

78 years

TARGET ORIENTORS

The goal is a corridor of joint sustainability

Official purposes 2030 years separated from expert guidance 2035 years.

OFFICIAL GOALS 2030

EXPERT CORRIDOR 2035

35–38%

≥2% GDP

Trending GDP growth

inflation

Depreciation of funds

Life expectancy

Internal R&D costs

poverty

TFR

The benchmark is considered to be achieved only jointly: growth without accelerating inflation, employment without exhausting people, input without increasing hidden obligations.

Decisions must take into account different lags

PROJECT OFFER

Fast tools create measurability; medium-term tools create productivity; long tools create reproduction of people, funds, and territories.

12–18 MONTH

2–5 YEARS

3–10 YEARS

Unified Balance Register

Automation and productivity

Family infrastructure and health

Data Passports and Methods

Long money for verified projects

Fixed asset life cycle

Early warning panel

Critical technology chains

Territorial connectivity

Environmental closure

Portfolio Rule: Each measure shows the stock being created, the changeable flow, the commitment being made, and the adjacent constraint.

EQUILIBRIUM: Decision checking machine

PROJECT OFFER

Not a new window of statistics: the sources remain with the data owners; the circuit connects the balances, stress tests the solutions and keeps the verification trail.

DATA

BALANCE

STRESS

SCENARIO

PORTFOLIO

AUDIT

Passport

Indicators

Balance and

Time to threshold

Cascade

Vulnerability

Corridor

Results

Priority

projects

The decision followed and

verification

OPEN SLAY

PROTECTED SLAY

aggregated indicators • methods • version • national report

design data • scenarios • sensitive infrastructure • access control

Prior to launch, an integration scheme with EMISS, GAS "Management" and departmental GIS is required - without duplicating owners and functions.

Three pilots will prove the value of the system

PILOT HYPOTHESIS

The horizon is 12–18 months: three cross-industry chains, a single methodology and a verifiable management result.

DEMOGRAPHY → LAB → HOUSING

PILOT EXIT

Cost of family sustainability

Data Passports

basic balances and thresholds

INVESTMENTS → FUNDS → ENERGY SETS

input minus disposal and maintenance

Stress test of three chains

the Quarter Panel

RESOURCE → PROCESSING → LOGISTICS

Independent verification report

Environmental closure

ECO‑PPA the " World Cup "SPECZASHCHITA" - possible application contours only after unification of indicators, legal regime and independent verification.

A decision is required to launch the pilot

DECISION FOR CONSIDERATION

Approve Methodical Framework

CRITERIA OF SUCCESS

Stock • Flow • Reproduction • Commitment

The portfolio decision changes based on the associated balance, and the effect is confirmed by an independent check.

Appointing a State Employer

Data Owners • Scientific Council • Independent Validator

90 days to collect the basic contour

Passports indicators • three chains • integration card

TO START DURING

Legal format

After 12 months to make a decision

Budget and source of funding

scale, adjust or stop by verifiable KPI

Integration with state GIS

Access and Cyber Protection Mode

Sovereignty XXI centuries - reproduce people, knowledge, capital, infrastructure and the natural environment faster than they are eliminated.

Sources cited in presentation 27

  • Original synthesis of the strategic report.
  • Bank of Russia — international reserves: https://www.cbr.ru/statistics/macro_itm/external_sector/ir/
  • Ministry of Finance of Russia — public debt and the National Security Fund: https://minfin.gov.ru/ru/press-center/
  • Rosstat — demography and fixed assets: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/12781; https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/14304
  • ISSEZ HSE according to Rosstat — R & D 2024: https://issek.hse.ru/news/1105778603.html
  • Rosstat — national accounts: https://rosstat.gov.ru/statistics/accounts
  • Bank of Russia — macroeconomic statistics: https://www.cbr.ru/statistics/
  • Synthesis of official data of Rosstat, the Bank of Russia, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Energy and the Ministry of Natural Resources; initial report, figure 7.
  • Bank of Russia — financial accounts and balances: https://www.cbr.ru/statistics/macro_itm/fafbs/financial_accounts/
  • Bank of Russia - Macroeconomic Review, January 2026: https://www.cbr.ru/Queries/XsltBlock/File/87500/-1/2601
  • Bank of Russia — Russia’s balance of payments, 2025: https://cbr.ru/Collection/Collection/File/62277/Balance_of_Payments_2026-2_27.pdf
  • Rosstat - the natural movement of the population, 2024: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/313/document/255130
  • Rosstat — demography: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/12781
  • Rosstat — historical poverty line: https://rosstat.gov.ru/bgd/regl/b11_14p/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d01/05-11.htm
  • Rosstat - preliminary poverty assessment 2025: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/33_13-03-2026.html
  • Bank of Russia — Macroeconomic Review: https://www.cbr.ru/Queries/XsltBlock/File/87500/-1/2601
  • Rosstat — historical range of R&D personnel: https://rosstat.gov.ru/bgd/regl/B01_57/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d010/i010010r.htm
  • ISSEZ HSE - R & D 2024: https://issek.hse.ru/news/1105778603.html
  • Rospatent — applications for inventions 2024: https://rospatent.gov.ru/ru/news/20-02-2025-kolichestvo-rossiyskih-zayavok-na-registraciyu-izobreteniy-vyroslo-na-9-4
  • Russian Ministry of Energy — performance results for 2025: https://minenergo.gov.ru/upload/iblock/24f/w5di5x0ijq6p6wjy4haccvptagofymwr/Prezentatsia_Kollegia_Minenergo.pdf
  • Rosstat — grain harvest: https://rosstat.gov.ru/bgd/regl/b11_38/IssWWW.exe/Stg/04-07.htm
  • Rosstat — housing construction, 2024: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/jil_stroi_2024.doc
  • Rosstat — fixed assets: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/14304
  • Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia — state report: https://gosdoklad.mnr.gov.ru/
  • Rosstat — environmental protection: https://rosstat.gov.ru/compendium/document/13295
  • Analytical synthesis of the initial report, table 17; official ranks of Rosstat and the Bank of Russia.
  • Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No309 of 07.05.2024: https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50542

Published files

Analytics · Full published text

The Balances of China and the United States, 1896–2026

Source Status: Primary Document

Comparison of long-term balances of China and the United States in the EQUILIBRIUM synchronisation model.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/balansy-kitaya-i-ssha-1896-2026

Open on the site

Russia as a Third Circuit • EQUILIBRIUM • Meanings • Benefits of Synchronization

— Historical analysis by era and scenario calculation 2026–2035 —

27 August 2026

Prepared for Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The actual horizon ends predominantly at 2025; 2026 is the cut-off date. All future effects are labeled as scenarios, not predictions.

Summary for decisions

$52,83 trillion Nominal GDP of three countries 44,6% World Peace, 2025≈51% World military expenditures 2025≈49% Territorial Emissions CO₂ 2024$0,6–1,0 trillion Central Annual Dividend Scenario
The full integration of the three powers is unrealistic and undesirable. The modular synchronization of measurable public goods is realistic: strategic stability, climate and methane, pandemics, fundamental science, civil nuclear energy, compatible technical standards and emergency logistics.
  • China for 130 The country has moved from the disintegration of monetary and territorial ties to the largest production and electrical system in the world; its new deficit is demographics, domestic demand, housing and feedback.
  • The United States has created the strongest link between federal science, entrepreneurship, capital, standards and allied networks; their weak point is debt, uneven infrastructure and the separation of financial and technological flows from social reproduction.
  • Russia adds resource depth, nuclear-space and heavy engineering competencies, geographical stability; limitation is the weak transformation of strategic reserves into diversified civilian flows.
  • The basic structural scenario ≈$1,00 trillion Net Annual Use 2035 the Year After 20%- his deduction of overlaps and ≈$4,49 trillion NPV the National Park 2026–2035. Conservative independent scrutiny ≈$0,60 trillion per year and ≈$4,02 trillion NPV.
  • Nuclear, climate, epidemiological and technological tail risk are not monetized. Therefore, the monetary model is deliberately incomplete and rather underestimates the social value of safe coordination.

How to read EQUILIBRIUM

EQUILIBRIUM - not equality of forces and not the absence of conflict. It is the ability of the system to reproduce itself without destroying its own reserves, legitimacy and environment.

AxisWhat we measureTypical gap
ReservesNatural, productive, infrastructural, human, scientific, financial and institutional capital.Resources do not become wealth.
StreamsIncome, trade, investment, energy, productivity, diffusion of technology.Rapid growth creates debt and critical dependencies.
ReproductionDemography, health, education, R & D, depreciation, natural capital.The current flow consumes the future.
ResilienceDiversification, reserves, food, energy, recovery time.Efficiency normally turns into fragility in shock.
LegalityTrust, predictable rules, benefit sharing, feedback.Coercion and one-off transactions replace sustained consent.
External effectsEmissions, depletion, future commitments, cross-border and military risks.The benefits inside create more damage outside or in the future.

Author's analytical framework; indicators are normalized relative to a safe corridor.

The Index Formula

E = 100 × ∏(sᵢ / 100)ʷⁱ. Geometric mean deliberately makes a weak measurement significant: high GDP cannot fully compensate for demographic failure or strategic instability.

DYNAMIC CONDITION Reproduction + stock gain ≥ depreciation + damage + accumulated risk.

Methods and limits of comparison

  • 1896 is the beginning of the horizon, but the first hard points often refer to 1900, 1910 or 1913 years.
  • Until 1950, Chinese GDP was an academic reconstruction of Maddison Project Database 2023 rather than official statistics. International dollars 2011 should not be mixed with current dollars.
  • Mainland China, the Republic of China, the occupied territories, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan have different coverage in sources. The tables show the nearest comparable points.
  • For the United States, federal debt, gross government debt, public debt, and non-financial corporations are different perimeters; they are not summed up mechanically.
  • 2026 is the date of the publication cut. The last complete annual fact in most series is 2025; the forecast IMF on 2026 is not used as an observation.
  • Scenario calculation of synchronization is a transparent model of the range, not a forecast, not an estimate of budget income and not a recommendation of a political union.
Early figures are rounded; alternative reconstructions can change the sign of a short-term trend. Therefore, the key object of analysis is the order of magnitude, the balance mechanism and the direction of change, not the tenths of a percent.

China: map of 130-year transition

PeriodMechanismBalance sheet
1896–1911Late Qing: Modernization without Sovereign ControlStocks of knowledge and infrastructure arose, but external dependence and low fiscal capacity did not allow them to turn into mass income.
1912–1927Republic: faster than the state networksMarket flows accelerated, but the central state did not provide a single money, security and infrastructure standard.
1928–1936Nanjing Decade: Short State AssemblyInvestment and monetization accelerated, but the budget did not exceed about 8,8% GDP, and assets were concentrated on the coast.
1937–1949War and hyperinflation: the destruction of capital and trustThe issue replaced the budget, the relocation replaced reproduction, and the military logic replaced investment.
1949–1957Recovery and the Five-Year PlanProduction and human reserves were rapidly recovering; agriculture and consumption remained subservient to heavy industry.
1958–1962Big jump: goal without feedbackPoor data validation and suppressed feedback have made planned acceleration a source of systemic damage.
1963–1965Correction: V-shaped recoveryProportions and incentives restored the flow without changing the political regime.
1966–1978Fortress balance and strategic capacitiesAutonomy and heavy infrastructure increased; services, labor mobility, and critical scientific environments lagged behind.
1978–1991Reforms: Release of Hidden ProductivityThe main resource is not new capital, but the removal of administrative blockages from labor, agricultural surplus and local initiative.
1992–2001Institutional assembly before the WTOMarket institutions and infrastructure have prepared an export push; the price is layoffs, the regional gap and weak social protection.
2001–2008WTO and Export-Investment SupercycleThe surpluses increased the external buffer, but low consumption and emissions carried some of the costs into the future and beyond the balance sheet.
2009–2019Credit, infrastructure and digital platformsInfrastructure has become a real asset; local debt and real estate a deferred liability.
2020–2026Technological Maximum and Reproduction DeficitManufacturing and technology stock is record; bottlenecks are population, domestic demand, housing, debt, and household confidence.

Periodization is authorial; actual supports are given on subsequent pages.

Source: World Bank WDI [S08] Urbanization schedule is used for continuity WDI/UN; official NBS 2025 — 67,89%.

China: 1896–1911 — Late Qing: modernization without sovereign control

Railways and new schools grew, but graduation per capita and manageability did not keep pace with demographics and external obligations.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Population400,0 → 427,7 million1900–1911; +6,9%[S01]
Real GDP388,8 → 387,0 billion intl$ 20111900–1911; −0,5%[S01]
GDP per capita972 → 905 intl$ 2011−6,9%[S01]
Railways≈9,4 thousand km1911; only ≈20% under Chinese control[S01]
New schools<7 thousands. → 1,6 Millions of students1902–1909; ≈59 Thousands of schools[S01]
Boxer indemnity450 million Haiguanese lan4% per annum, 39 years[S01]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Stocks of knowledge and infrastructure arose, but external dependence and low fiscal capacity did not allow them to turn into mass income.

Meaning

Sovereignty without a mechanism for coordinating capital, territory and information remained declarative.

China: 1912–1927 — Republic: faster than the state networks

Port cities, banks, schools and private industry developed with political fragmentation.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Population437,1 → 487,3 millionNearest points 1913–1929[S01]
Real GDP430,6 → 488,7 billion intl$+13,5%[S01]
GDP per capita985 → 1 003 intl$+1,8%[S01]
Railways≈8 → 12 thousands of km1912–1927[S01]
Students≈3 → almost 7 million1912–1922[S01]
Modern industry≈+13,8% per year1912–1920, with very low base[S01]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Market flows accelerated, but the central state did not provide a single money, security and infrastructure standard.

Meaning

The economic network is able to live at a weak center - but almost unable to amortize war and systemic shock.

China: 1928–1936 - Nanjing Decade: Short State Assembly

National finance, scientific institutions and transport for the first time began to form a single contour.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Population487,3 → 508,0 million1929–1936[S01]
Real GDP488,7 → 541,0 billion intl$+10,7%[S01]
GDP per capita1 003 → 1 065 intl$+6,2%[S01]
Modern industry≈2% GDP1933; island in agrarian economy[S01]
Students≈20 million1936; primary and secondary schools[S01]
Academia Sinicafounded in 192815 seasons of Yinshuya excavations up to 1937[S30]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Investment and monetization accelerated, but the budget did not exceed about 8,8% GDP, and assets were concentrated on the coast.

Meaning

Institutions began to synchronize knowledge and the state; the margin of safety was less than the external threat.

China: 1937–1949 - War and hyperinflation: the destruction of capital and trust

The military and civil divide have simultaneously destroyed physical assets, human capital and monetary coordination.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Population510,6 → 541,7 million1937–1949[S01]
GDP per capita1 034 → 799 intl$1937–1950; −22,7%[S01]
Total GDP≈−17,3%1937–1950[S01]
Losses of War≈15 Millions of dead60–95 million refugees; academic estimates[S01]
Working Railways≈11 thousand kmfrom 21,8 thousand km laid to 1949[S01]
Price level≈×36 trillion prewarMay 1949; Bank of China retrospective[S31]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

The issue replaced the budget, the relocation replaced reproduction, and the military logic replaced investment.

Meaning

Hyperinflation has turned the military deficit into a crisis of legitimacy: without trust, cash flow ceases to coordinate exchange.

China: 1949–1957 - Recovery and Five-Year Plan

The industrial framework was created faster than consumer, but the restoration of health and basic production was real.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Population541,7 → 646,5 million+19,4%[S04]
Real GDP≈+9,27% per year1953–1957; +55,8% cumulative[S03]
Industry≈+19,7% per yearI five-year plan[S03]
Coal32 → 131 million tons1949–1957[S05]
Electricity4,3 → 19,3 TWT·h1949–1957[S05]
Steel0,158 → 5,35 million tons1949–1957[S05]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Production and human reserves were rapidly recovering; agriculture and consumption remained subservient to heavy industry.

Meaning

Centralization proved to be effective for the collection of basic capital, but laid the risk of a single plan error.

China: 1958–1962 — Big jump: goal without feedback

The mobilization of heavy industry has destroyed the food, demographic and information balance.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Real GDP−9,3% to the level 19571958–1962; after +21,3% in 1958[S03]
Grain≈200 → 143,5 million tons1958–1960; ≈−28%[S32]
Grain for the soul306 → 240 kg1957–1962[S32]
Mortality25,4‰1960; official series[S04]
Population662,1 → 658,6 million1960–1961; −3,48 million[S04]
Excess deaths≈16,5–30 millionAcademic Range[S32]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Poor data validation and suppressed feedback have made planned acceleration a source of systemic damage.

Meaning

EQUILIBRIUM requires the right of reality to abolish a political goal; without this power turns into the destruction of reproduction.

China: 1963–1965 — Correction: V-shaped recovery

The return of agricultural incentives and industry proportions has shown the value of adaptability even within the planned system.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Real GDP≈+15,1% per year1963–1965; +52,5% cumulative[S03]
Sector A/L/H37,3 / 32,3 / 30,4%1965 vs 21,8 / 26,1 / 52,1% vs 1960[S03]
Steel6,67 → 12,23 million tons1962–1965[S05]
Electricity45,8 → 67,6 TWT·h1962–1965[S05]
Grain for the soul240 → 272 kg1962–1965[S32]
Oil5,75 → 11,31 million tons1962–1965[S05]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Proportions and incentives restored the flow without changing the political regime.

Meaning

Sustainability is not determined by the absence of errors, but by the speed of recognizing the error and restoring feedback.

China: 1966–1978 — Fortress balance and strategic capabilities

Energy, oil and defense science grew with almost frozen urbanization and damaged academic staff reproduction.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Real GDP≈+6,25% per year1966–1978; with recessions 1967, 1968, 1976[S03]
Population725,4 → 962,6 million+32,7%[S04]
Urbanization17,98% → 17,92%1965–1978; almost no shift[S04]
Energy188 → 628 million t.1965–1978; ×3,34[S05]
Oil11,3 → 104,1 million tons1965–1978; ×9,2[S05]
Electricity67,6 → 256,6 TWT·h1965–1978; ×3,8[S05]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Autonomy and heavy infrastructure increased; services, labor mobility, and critical scientific environments lagged behind.

Meaning

CAS helped create the atomic bomb, satellite, synthetic insulin and other results, but could not compensate for the closure of universities and the destruction of verification.

China: 1978–1991 — Reforms: Release of Hidden Productivity

Family contract, rural and settlement enterprises and FEZ have transferred labor to more productive contours without dismantling the state.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Real GDP≈+9,10% per year1979–1991[S08]
GDP$0,150 → $0,385 trillion1978–1991, current dollars[S08]
Population956 → 1 151 million1978–1991[S08]
Urbanization17,92% → 26,94%1978–1991[S08]
Turnover$20,6 → $135,6 billion1978–1991[S06]
Reserves$0,167 → $21,7 billion1978–1991[S06]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

The main resource is not new capital, but the removal of administrative blockages from labor, agricultural surplus and local initiative.

Meaning

The reform showed that a combination of the market and the strategic state can increase the flow without instantaneous loss of controllability.

China: 1992–2001 - Institutional assembly before the WTO

The market has become the main mechanism of allocation, and the state has retained control over finances, land and command heights.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Real GDP≈+10,42% per year1992–2001[S08]
GDP$0,385 → $1,355 trillionCurrent dollars[S08]
Share of world GDP1,60% → 4,02%Denomination[S08]
Urbanization26,94% → 37,66%1991–2001[S08]
Turnover$509,8 billion2001[S06]
R & D0,93% GDP2001[S08]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Market institutions and infrastructure have prepared an export push; the price is layoffs, the regional gap and weak social protection.

Meaning

By the time China joined the WTO, it was already a system of market coordination and long-term state capital, not just a “cheap factory.”

China: 2001–2008 - WTO and Export-Investment Supercycle

The maximum external efficiency has given reserves and technologies, while increasing dependence on demand and environmental burden.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Real GDP≈+11,06% per year2002–2008[S08]
GDP$1,355 → $4,667 trillion2001–2008[S08]
Trade38,1% → 56,7% GDPPeak External Dependency[S08]
Current account1,28% → 9,01% GDP2001–2008[S08]
Reserves$212 billion → $1,946 trillion2001–2008[S08]
CO₂3,72 → 7,49 Gt2001–2008[S29]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

The surpluses increased the external buffer, but low consumption and emissions carried some of the costs into the future and beyond the balance sheet.

Meaning

External demand is able to accelerate modernization, but does not replace internal reproduction of income and environment.

China: 2009–2019 — Credit, infrastructure and digital platforms

After the crisis, the external imbalance decreased, but its place was taken by domestic credit, land and real estate.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Real GDP≈+7,82% per year2009–2019[S08]
GDP$4,667 → $14,56 trillion2008–2019[S08]
Share of the world7,25% → 16,40%Nominal GDP[S08]
Trade56,7% → 35,45% GDPExternal macro-dependence has decreased[S08]
R & D2,20% GDP2019[S07]
VSM≈35 thousand km2019[S07]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Infrastructure has become a real asset; local debt and real estate a deferred liability.

Meaning

China has moved from export dependence to domestic investment, while maintaining a high capacity for execution.

China: 2020–2026 — Technological maximum and reproduction deficit

China’s weakness is not the ability to produce, but the ability to turn production into sustainable domestic well-being.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
GDP140,19 trillion RMB / $19,50 trillion2025; real growth +5,0%[S02]
Population1 404,89 million; −3,39 million per year2025; birth rate 7,92 million[S02]
Urbanization67,89%2025, definition NBS[S02]
Turnover$6,355 trillionExports $3,772 trillion; Surplus $1,189 trillion[S02]
R & D3,926 trillion RMB; 2,80% GDP2025; basic science 7,08% R&D[S02]
Generation10 575 TWT·h; clean 40,2%2025; Power 3,891 TW[S02]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Manufacturing and technology stock is record; bottlenecks are population, domestic demand, housing, debt, and household confidence.

Meaning

The next stage requires shifting the center of gravity from “investment + exports” to income, social protection and productivity.

China: what the Academy of Sciences has changed

1949 Establishment of CAS Strategic Expert Center>1 600 Research institutions in the middle 1960- Oh, the whole system78 thousand international PCT-applications 2025, order of magnitude2,80% R&D / GDP 2025

The Chinese Academy of Sciences has been particularly strong as an integrator of strategic tasks: fundamental physics, atomic and space programs, materials, biology, geology, and expert support for industrial policy. Its contribution was not to “create GDP in general” but to reduce the uncertainty and time between task, research, prototype, and scaling.

  • Strong institutional linkage: strategic challenge → academic institute → engineering circuit → industrial scaling.
  • The verifiable symbolic results of the Maoist period: the atomic bomb (1964), Crystalline insulin (1965), The hydrogen bomb (1967), satellite (1970), hybrid rice and artemisinin.
  • The main limit: the Academy cannot replace true statistics, autonomous verification and reproduction of personnel. The closure of universities and violations of 1966–1970 years showed this boundary.
  • Modern challenge: the share of basic research — 7,08% R & D 2025 year; an increase in the overall budget does not automatically mean an adequate supply of open basic science.
The Academy increases strategic autonomy when embedded in the contour of task setting and implementation; it retains EQUILIBRIUM only with independent verification and long personnel reproduction.

USA: map of 130-year transition

PeriodMechanismBalance sheet
1896–1916Mass production and the national marketIndustrial scale, immigration and national networks have created a flow faster than social protection and financial supervision.
1917–1929Electrification, consumer credit and vulnerabilityElectricity and mass consumption increased productivity; the credit superstructure became a source of instability.
1929–1945Depression, New Deal and MobilizationThe state became the balancer of last resort; military mobilization restored output, but through emergency mode and debt.
1945–1971Wide post-war EQUILIBRIUMProductivity growth, mass education, infrastructure, science, and income distribution were synchronized better than in subsequent periods.
1971–2000Dollar, financial and digital networksAfter the abandonment of gold, trust was monetized through the dollar, capital markets, technology, and regulations; production gradually lost relative weight.
2001–2019Global Option and Financial Leverage PriceThe dollar, technology, and markets allowed the deficit to be financed; the crisis of 2008 showed the price of separating financial flows from asset quality.
2020–2026Energy and scientific power in debt and agingUS preserves advanced science, energy, capital, and networks; constraints include debt, uneven infrastructure, aging, and rapid growth in energy demand AI.

Periodization is authorial; the ranks of population, education, R&D, energy, and debt have different sources.

USA: 1896–1916 — Mass production and national market

Industrial scale, immigration and national networks have created a flow faster than social protection and financial supervision.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Population76,2 → 92,2 million1900–1910[S12]
Urban share39,6% → 45,6%1900–1910[S12]
Share of world GDP≈16%1900, reconstruction[S01]
Secondary school13.5% completed1910[S15]
Bachelor2,7%1910[S15]
InstitutionsFRS 1913; NACA 1915Coordination of Money and Aviation Science[S14]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Industrial scale, immigration and national networks have created a flow faster than social protection and financial supervision.

USA: 1917–1929 - Electrification, consumer credit and vulnerability

Electricity and mass consumption increased productivity; the credit superstructure became a source of instability.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Population106 million1920[S12]
Urban share51,2%1920[S12]
Nominal GDP$104,6 billion1929[S13]
New infrastructurecar, radio, power gridmass diffusion 1920s[S13]
CreditFast expansionconsumption and securities[S14]
Financial summaryCrash 1929Overestimated risk and weak protection[S14]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Electricity and mass consumption increased productivity; the credit superstructure became a source of instability.

USA: 1929–1945 — Depression, New Deal, and Mobilization

The state became the balancer of last resort; military mobilization restored output, but through emergency mode and debt.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Real Issue≈−30%1929–1933[S13]
Unemployment≈25%the Great Depression Peak[S14]
Population132,2 million1940[S12]
Urban share56,5%1940[S12]
Secondary school24.5% completed1940[S15]
Federal debt114,1% GDP1945[S17]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

The state became the balancer of last resort; military mobilization restored output, but through emergency mode and debt.

USA: 1945–1971 — Wide post-war EQUILIBRIUM

Productivity growth, mass education, infrastructure, science, and income distribution have been synchronized better than in subsequent periods.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Population151,3 → 203,2 million1950–1970[S12]
Urban share64,0% → 73,6%1950–1970[S12]
Electricity334 → 1 535 TWT·h1950–1970[S18]
R & D1,33% → 2,45% GDP1953–1970; peak 2,79% at 1964[S16]
Debt85,7% → 35,5% GDP1948–1970[S17]
InstitutionsNSF 1950; NASA and DARPA 1958Federal Science and Procurement[S16]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Productivity growth, mass education, infrastructure, science, and income distribution were synchronized better than in subsequent periods.

USA: 1971–2000 — Dollar, financial and digital networks

After the abandonment of gold, confidence was monetized through the dollar, capital markets, technology, and regulations; production gradually lost relative weight.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Population203,2 → 281,4 million1970–2000[S12]
Urban share73,6% → 79,0%1970–2000[S12]
Electricity1 535 → 3 802 TWT·h1970–2000[S18]
R & D2,45% → 2,61% GDP1970–2000[S16]
Debt35,5% → 54,9% GDP1970–2000[S17]
Bachelor11,0% → 25,6%1970–2000[S15]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

After the abandonment of gold, trust was monetized through the dollar, capital markets, technology, and regulations; production gradually lost relative weight.

USA: 2001–2019 — Global optionality and the price of financial leverage

The dollar, technology, and markets were able to finance the deficit; the crisis of 2008 showed the price of separating financial flows from asset quality.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Population281,4 → 328 million2000–2019[S12]
Federal debt54,5% → 105,2% GDP2001–2019[S17]
R & D2,63% → 3,09% GDP2001–2019[S16]
Current account−6,2% GDP2006, maximum deficit[S13]
Electricity≈4 PWT·h2019, order of magnitude[S18]
Manufacturing industry≈10–12% GDPend of period[S13]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

The dollar, technology, and markets allowed the deficit to be financed; the crisis of 2008 showed the price of separating financial flows from asset quality.

USA: 2020–2026 - Energy and scientific power in debt and aging

US preserves advanced science, energy, capital, and networks; constraints include debt, uneven infrastructure, aging, and rapid growth in energy demand AI.
IndicatorValuePeriod / PerimeterSource
Population331,45 → 341,78 million2020–2025[S34]
65+≈61,2 million; about 18%2024[S12]
Electricity≈4,43 PWT·h2025[S18]
R & D$1,009 trillion by PPP; 3,44% GDP2024[S16]
Federal debt≈121,5% GDP2025[S17]
Dollars in Reserves≈57%2026Q1, IMF COFER[S13]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

US preserves advanced science, energy, capital, and networks; constraints include debt, uneven infrastructure, aging, and rapid growth in energy demand AI.

USA: scientific and innovative contour

≈$1,009 trillion PPP R & D costs 20243,44% R&D / GDP 202429% World R&D 20241950/1958 NSF / NASA and DARPA institutional anchors

The American model is not one “academy”, but a distributed ecosystem: federal agencies formulate missions and purchase results; universities produce fundamental knowledge and personnel; entrepreneurs and the capital market scale; standards and allied networks expand the foreign market.

  • The advantage is a high innovative option: a lot of parallel experiments and a quick transfer of a successful solution to capital and standards.
  • Vulnerability is the separation of financial valuation from the quality of a physical asset, demonstrated by the crisis of 2008.
  • A new balance sheet challenge is the energy intensity of computing and AI: scientific flow is growing, but requires power grids, generation, water, personnel and local consent.
  • Federal debt raises the cost of choice: innovative and defense commitments compete with debt service and an aging population.

Three Powers: The Scale That Makes Coordination Systemic

Source: World BankS19–S21] Nominal GDP — $52,829 trillion, or 44,6% world; PPP amount — $79,265 trillion, or about 37,5% World.

ContourAmount of three countriesShare of the worldDateSource
Nominal GDP$52,829 trillion44,6% World2025[S19–S20]
GDP by PPP$79,265 trillion≈37,5% World2025[S21]
Population≈1,892 billion≈23% World2025[S19]
Military expenditures$1,480 trillion≈51% World2025[S22]
Territorial CO₂≈18,96 Gt≈49,2% World2024[S29]
Primary energy≈304,5 EJ≈49% World2024, rating[S28]
Foreign trade turnover≈$12,3 trillion≈25% world turnover2024, gross[S26–S27]

Trade turnover counts exports and imports and therefore contains a double bill. The energy estimate depends on the substitution method.

Meanings of three systems: not character, but an optimized function

SystemWhat optimizesStrong senseRisk
ChinaScope and coordinationSovereignty through organized development and material reproduction.Investments outpace revenues, demographics, ecology, and feedback.
USAOptionality and NetworksFreedom of action through innovation, capital, standards and allied networks.Financial and technological flows break away from industrial and social reproduction.
RussiaAutonomy and SurvivalSovereignty through resource depth and the ability to withstand prolonged shock.Defense and raw materials stocks dominate diversified civilian flows.

Analytical ideal types; not a statement of a fixed national character.

The total EQUILIBRIUM occurs when Chinese scale, American option, and Russian resilience cease to mutually destroy each other.
ContourUSAChinaRussiaSynergy
Science and technologyAdvanced Research, Software, CapitalEngineering Iteration and ScalingFundamental school, atom, spaceIdea → prototype → mass system
ProductionCapital-intensive high technologiesCompleteness of chains and scaleMaterials, energy, heavy engineeringLow Price + Backup
Energy and climateTechnology, Finance, MarketThe largest electric power industry and cleantechResources, Atom, ArcticStandards for networks, atom and methane
Global risksCalculations, satellites, epidemiologyScale of implementation and productionStrategic stability, the ArcticPublic goods outside a lone power

The benefits of synchronization: model and formulas

Synchronization is not a union, not a single currency and not the removal of all restrictions. This is a limited, verifiable compatibility in projects where the public result is higher than the cost of dependency.

The basic economy of the three countries in 2025 the Year Y₂₅ = $52,829 trillion With real growth 2,2% Conditional scale per year 2035 years Y₃₅ = $65,672 trillion The net effect in 2035 the Year:

Net₃₅ = F + 0,8 × (EL + S) + D − C

ComponentFormulaLow/Basic/HighLogic
F - Prevented fragmentationY₃₅ × f0,5% / 1,2% / 2,5%Calibration within the range IMF 0,2–almost 7% World Edition.
EL - Trade and LogisticsT×a×c×0,5 + 5%Y₂₅×ea=40/50/60%; c=2/4/6%; e=1/3/5%T≈$12,3 trillion; 0,5 removes double import/export account.
S - Scientific diffusionR×q×mq=5/10/15%; m=25/50/75%R≈$1,52 trillion R&D; win only on compatible circuit.
D - less security duplicationM×d×0,5d=2/6/12%M=$1,48 trillion; only half is considered as a productive equivalent.
C - coordination costsY₃₅×k0,05/0,08/0,12%Verification, adaptation, cybersecurity, compensation, reservation.
20%th Deduction of Overlays0,8×(EL+S)Single for three scenariosIt is impossible to calculate trade and scientific productivity twice.

Parameters are the author's scenario assumptions; external sources only specify the order of the bases and the permissible range of damage.

How much synchronization

Author's model. Structural Scenarios - Effect to 2035; Conservative Cut - Independent verification of sustainable annual effect.

ScenarioClean / yearNPV 2026–2035Before the overlapsInterpretation
Low$0,386 trillion$1,73 trillion$0,405 trillionLimited standards, security, separate logistics
Basic$1,001 trillion$4,49 trillion$1,058 trillionFunctional synchronization; recommended reference point
High$2,072 trillion$9,29 trillion$2,176 trillionWide discharge; high political and dependency price
Conservative Review≈$0,600 trillion≈$4,02 trillion—Other base and parameters; 3-year phase, rate 4%
Strict verification$0,779 trillion——Basic scenario without EL and S — only F + D − C

NPV of the structural model: linear effect growth from 10% to 100%, real rate 3%; coefficient 4,4839.

Basic scenario: F=$0,788 trillion; EL=$0,202 trillion and S=$0,076 trillion to 20%- his deduction; D=$0,044 trillion; C=$0,053 trillion

The central plausible dividend is approximately $0,6–1,0 trillion per year and $4,0–4,5 trillion NPV the National Park 2026–2035. Wide scenario range — $0,36–2,07 trillion per year. This is not a budget income or a guarantee.

What is not monetized

RiskSynchronization mechanismWhy is importantHow to count
Nuclear escalationHotlines, notifications, rules AI and human solutionExpected damage = probability × catastrophic cost; parameters are unreliableShow separately, do not add to GDP
Climate and methaneCompatible measurements, satellite verification, leakage standardsThree countries ≈49% Territorial CO₂Count by Prevented Tons and Local Health
PandemicsEarly warning, sample libraries, backup powerRare but global systemic damageTime-Scenarios for Vaccine Detection and Release
Technological accidentCommon incident protocols AI, space and cyber systemsHigh uncertainty and dual purposeLimit the contour, measure the recovery time

New START expired in February 2026; SIPRI highlights the rise in nuclear uncertainty [S23].

IMF Assesses long-term losses from geo-economic fragmentation in the range 0,2% — almost 7% technological gap for individual countries - up to 12% GDP. WTO It shows almost 7% long-term loss of world GDP in a rigid two-block scenario. These estimates set the upper frame, but do not mean that tripartite coordination automatically prevents all damageS24–S25]

Secure Synchronization Architecture

ContourMinimum subject
1. Strategic sustainabilityHotlines; notifications of exercises and launches; rules of conduct in space and cyberspace; a mandatory human solution in the nuclear circuit.
2. ReproductionClimate and methane; pandemics; food; Arctic; fundamental science; civil nuclear energy.
3. CompatibilityMetrology; technical standards; emergency logistics; insurance and payments for permitted projects - without a single currency and political union.

Protective conditions

  • The narrow subject of each agreement and the symmetry of the test result.
  • Common basic data set, independent verification and public methodology.
  • Step-by-step reversible pilots; automatic review or suspension in case of violation.
  • Preservation of the original intellectual property and pre-defined mode of project IP.
  • Civil-military firewall, export control and prohibition of transfer to agreed military categories.
  • Diversification of critical supplies: Cooperation should not create monopoly dependence.
  • Openness to third countries following the same rules; absence of a closed “directorate of three”.
  • Distribution of benefit by proven contribution and prevented damage, not just by political weight.
  • Ladder disputes: Technical group → independent examination → political level → proportional suspension.

Scripts 2026–2035

ScenarioWhat is synchronisedEconomic resultEquilibrium
Block fragmentationOnly emergency contactsDuplication of capacities, expensive standards and logisticsLocal autonomy ↑; global externalities dramatically worse
Managed RivalryNuclear incidents, epidemics, selected climate dataSmall direct benefit, large optional valueThe main benefit is less probability of disaster
Functional SynchronizationSecurity + Science + Energy + Methane + Standards + Logistic permitted≈$0,6–1,0 trillion/year as central rangeThe best realistic balance of autonomy and overall result
Strategic détenteBroad markets, institutions and arms controlUp to the top of the model rangeMaximum gross benefit but high risk of new addiction
The third scenario is the most stable: cooperation where the result is measurable, dependence is limited, violation is detectable, and the output is reversible.

Conclusions

01 EQUILIBRIUM — Reproduction without the accumulation of irreversible debts.
02 For 130 years, the three powers have been breaking down not from lack of power, but from the gap between growth, feedback, and reproduction.
03 China has turned scale into production capacity; the new deficit is demographics, household incomes, and confidence in the future.
04 The United States has transformed innovation, capital and standards into global flows; the weak point is social and infrastructure reproducibility.
05 Russia has retained strategic reserves and autonomy; the bottleneck is their transformation into diversified civil flows.
06 1991–2008 The years were not a harmony, but an unmanageable triangular synchronization of demand, production, and resources.
07 Breaking ties increases the autonomy of individual circuits, but multiplies duplication, cost of standards, and externalities.
08 Complete integration is unrealistic; modular synchronization of measurable public goods is realistic.
09 The central cash dividend is about $0,6–1,0 trillion Strategic benefits of reducing tail risks may be greater, but not honestly monetized.
10 Success is measured by recovery time, capital renewal, and benefit sharing — not by the number of agreements signed.

Annex A. Verification of model arithmetic

VariableValueVerification
Y₂₅$52,829 trillion30,770 + 19,498 + 2,561
Y₃₅$65,672 trillion52,829 × 1,022¹⁰
Trade Base T$12,3 trilliongross export+import; double count factor 0,5
R&D Base R$1,52 trillionnominal approximation; do not mix with PPP-estimate NSF
Military Base M$1,48 trillionSIPRI 2025: 954 + 336 + 190 billion
Basic F$0,788 trillion65,672 × 1,2%
Basic EL$0,202 trillionbefore subtracting the overlaps
Basic S$0,076 trillionbefore subtracting the overlaps
Base D$0,044 trillion1,48 × 6% × 0,5
Base C$0,053 trillion65,672 × 0,08%
Basic Net$1,001 trillion0,788 + 0,8×(0,202+0,076) + 0,044 − 0,053
NPV$4,49 trillionNet × 4,4839; Linear phase, real rate 3%

The rounding may give a difference in the last sign.

Annex B. Sources

Primary and authoritative sources. Date of access: 27 August 2026.

[S01] Maddison Project Database 2023: Historical GDP and Population

[S02] NBS China: Statistical communiqué for 2025

[S03] NBS China: GDP and real rates 1952–1978

[S04] NBS China: demographic retrospective

[S05] China Statistical Yearbook: Industrial Products

[S06] NBS China: foreign trade, historical series

[S07] NBS China: Statistical communiqué for 2019

[S08] World Bank WDI: China, macroeconomic indicators

[S09] IMF: China 2025 Article IV Consultation

[S10] CAS: official profile of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

[S11] WIPO: PCT Yearly Review 2026

[S12] U.S. Census Bureau: Historical Tables of Population and Urbanization

[S13] BEA: National Income and Product Accounts

[S14] Federal Reserve History: The Creation of the Fed and the Great Depression

[S15] U.S. Department of Education/NCES: Digest of Education Statistics

[S16] NSF/NCSES: R&D and research publications, 2024

[S17] U.S. Treasury/Fiscal Data: Federal Government Debt

[S18] EIA: Monthly Energy Review and Electricity Data

[S19] World Bank: comparison of the USA, China and Russia

[S20World Bank: Global GDP and the Three Powers

[S21] World Bank: PPP GDP

[S22] SIPRI: World military expenditures in 2025

[S23] SIPRI Yearbook 2026: Nuclear Weapons and the End of the New START

[S24] IMF: the range of losses from geoeconomic fragmentation

[S25] WTO: The scenario of dividing the world economy into two blocks

[S26] WTO: Global Trade Outlook and Statistics 2025

[S27] BEA: U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, 2024

[S28] Energy Institute: Statistical Review of World Energy

[S29] Global Carbon Budget / Our World in Data: territorial emissions CO₂

[S30] Academia Sinica: Inshu's excavations

[S31] Bank of China: hyperinflation 1946–1949 years

[S32] PMC: Great Chinese Famine — Grain and Demographic Estimates

[S33] WIPO: World Intellectual Property Indicators 2025

[S34] U.S. Census Bureau: population clock/data

[S35] World Bank: Russia — macroeconomic profile

Annex C. Terms and reservations

TermValue
GDP by PPPEstimation of output adjusted for differences in domestic prices. It is not a market value of assets or a foreign exchange resource.
Current dollarsNominal conversion at the current rate; sensitive to currency and deflators.
International dollar 2011Maddison's historical reconstruction unit; does not mix with current dollars.
PPP R & DComparison of real research resources; not equal to nominal budget in dollars.
ScenarioConditional calculation with given parameters. Not a promise, not a prediction, not a causal estimate.
NPVThe present value of the effect flow; depends on the implementation trajectory and discount rate.
Tail riskA rare event with huge damage; the expected cost is extremely sensitive to probability.
SynchronizationLimited compatibility of data, standards, protocols and projects while maintaining political autonomy.

End of document

Other published edition: EQUILIBRIUM Balansy_China_SSHA_1896-2026_EQUILIBRIUM_Sinhronizatsiya.pptx · Web Text +

China and the United States in 130 years

$0,6–1,0

trillion PER YEAR

$4,0–4,5 trillion

Russia as the third circuit • 1896–2026

NPV 2026–2035

Balances • Meanings • Synchronization Benefits

The script,

not forecast

Prepared for Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

27 August 2026

Synchronization is able to $0,6–1,0 trillion per year

SUMMARY FOR DECISIONS

$0,60 trillion

$1,00 trillion

$4,49 trillion

$0,36–2,07 trillion

Conservative Cut

base scenario

NPV

Wide Uncertainty

sustainable annual effect

Effect to 2035

2026–2035, rate 3%

Low - High Scenario

This is not a union, not a budget income or a forecast. This is a scenario assessment of the prevented losses and compatible efficiency.

The main monetary channel is less fragmentation of standards, trade, energy and science.

Nuclear, climate and pandemic tail risk are not included.

The realistic format is modular, testable and reversible synchronization.

EQUILIBRIUM - reproduction without irreversible debts

CONCEPT

Not equality of forces. Not the absence of conflict. Not a maximum release.

REPRODUCTION + ΔRESERVES

AMORTIZATION + HUERB + DEPENDENT RISK

Growth is sustainable only if it does not deplete people, infrastructure, nature, trust and security.

Index E is the geometric mean of the six axes: a strong measurement cannot completely hide the failure of a weak one.

Six axes separate balance from growth illusion

RUBRIC

RESERVES

FLOWS

REPRODUCTION

Capital, resources, people, institutions

Revenue, Trade, Energy, Productivity

Demographics, health, education, research and development

SUSTAINABILITY

LEGALITY

EXTERNAL EFFECTS

Reserves, diversification, recovery time

Rules, trust, distribution, feedback

Emissions, risks, future liabilities

Rapid GDP can hide the depletion of the next cycle.

In 130 years, the three powers have built different power machines

COMPARATIVE LOGIC

CHINA

USA

RUSSIA

Scale

+

coordination

Optionality

+

Network

Autonomy

+

Survival Rate

RISK

RISK

RISK

Large scale error detected late

Financial Flows are Disrupted from Reproduction

Strategic reserves are poorly converted into civilian flows

EQUILIBRIUM occurs when these functions complement each other - without imposing a single model entirely.

1896–1949: China modernized faster than the state collected

CHINA • EARLY

1896–1911

1912–1927

1928–1936

1937–1949

Late Qing

Republic

Nanking

War

GDP/Soul 972→905; 9,4 thousand km railway; 1,6 Millions of new school students.

GDP/soul almost stood; w/d 8→12 thousand km; faster than the center.

GDP +10,7%; the Soul +6,2%; budget ≤8,8% GDP.

GDP/Soul −22,7%; ≈15 Millions of deaths; hyperinflation.

1900–1950: population +36,7%, Real GDP +12,4%, GDP per capita −17,8%.

Infrastructure and education grew from a low base.

Weak money, territory and taxes did not create a general outline.

War has destroyed capital; hyperinflation has destroyed trust.

1949–1978: Mobilization created power but damaged feedback

CHINA • MOBILIZATION CONTOUR

1949–1957

1958–1962

1963–1965

1966–1978

Recovery

Big Leap

Correction

Fortress balance

GDP +9,3%/year; industry ≈+19,7%; Steel 0,16→5,35 million tons.

GDP −9%; Grain −28%; mortality 25,4‰; 16,5–30 Millions of excess deaths.

GDP +15,1%/year; return of industry proportions; grain/soul 240→272 kg.

Energy ×3,3; Oil ×9,2; Urbanization ≈0 p.p.; higher education institutions violated.

CAS strengthened the atomic, space and biomedical contours - but could not replace truthful data and personnel reproduction.

The main lesson: the right of reality to cancel a political goal is a critical element of equilibrium.

1978–2001: Incentives turned numbers into productivity

CHINA • REFORMS

+9,1%/year

17,9% → 37,7%

$20,6 → $509,8 billion

Real GDP

Urbanization

Trade

1979–1991

1978–2001

1978–2001

The first source of the miracle is the removal of administrative blockages from labor and rural surplus.

The market has entered into a strong state.

FEZ and local enterprises have created a pilot circuit.

Price: layoffs, inequality, rip-off of the coast - inland areas.

2001–2019: external imbalance replaced by internal credit

CHINA • GLOBALIZATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

2001–2008

2009–2019

WTO: Maximum external efficiency

Credit, infrastructure, platforms

GDP $1,36→4,67 trillion; Trade 38,1→56,7% GDP; current account 9,0%; Reserves $1,95 trillion; CO₂ ×2.

GDP $4,67→14,56 trillion; share of the world 7,25→16,40%; Trade has declined to 35,45% GDP; R & D 2,20%; VSM ≈35 thousands of km.

China has reduced external macro-dependence but has suffered some of the imbalance in real estate, land and debt of local structures.

Infrastructure is a real asset. Funding commitments are a deferred balance sheet.

2020–2026: China's main deficit is reproduction

CHINA • CURRENT

$19,50 trillion

−3,39 million

2,80% GDP

10 575 TWT·h

Nominal GDP

Population change

R & D

Generation

+5,0% the Real World 2025

2025; 7,92 million births

3,926 trillion RMB

40,2% net

ContourFact 2025Balance signal
Trade$6,355 trillion; Surplus $1,189 trillionExternal competitiveness is high
Real estateInvestments −17,2%The old investment machine is shrinking.
Reserves$3,358 trillionExternal buffer remains large
Demography65+ = 15,9%The price of social protection and labor shortage is growing

Next transition: investment + export → household income + social protection + productivity.

China's balance: coordination strong, feedback vulnerable

CHINA • RESULTS

AxisStrength SideLimitation
ReservesIndustry, networks, infrastructureProperty and some debt overvalued
StreamsExport, electricity, scalingWeak domestic demand
ReproductionEducation and R & DPopulation reduction, ageing
ResilienceReserves and chain completenessEnergy and trade external risks
LegalityAbility to executeLate detection of scale error
External effectsGreen Power≈12,3 Gt CO₂ in 2024

Weakness is not the ability to produce; weakness is the ability to turn production into sustainable well-being.

Academy Strengthens Sovereignty — But Doesn't Replace Verification

CHINA •

1949

>1 600

≈78 thousands.

7,08%

creation CAS

Research Institutes

PCT-applications

basic science

Strategic Expert Center

the whole system by the middle of the 1960s

2025, order of magnitude

share in R&D, 2025

Strong Linkage: Problem → Institute → engineering circuit → scaling.

Testable results: atom, satellite, insulin, hybrid rice, artemisinin.

The limits of the system were shown by the Cultural Revolution: the closure of universities damaged personnel reproduction.

The budget of science does not compensate for weak statistics and suppressed criticism.

1896–1945: US Connects Industry, Standards, and State Risk

USA • Early

1896–1916

1917–1929

1929–1945

Mass production

Electrification and credit

Balanced State

Population 76,2→92,2 million; urban 39,6→45,6%; Fed 1913; NACA 1915.

V 1920 Most of them became urban. GDP 1929 ≈$104,6 billion; Credit risk ahead of supervision.

Release −≈30%; Unemployment ≈25%; C 1945 Debt ≈115–118% GDP.

The market did not restore balance automatically: the New Deal and mobilization transferred systemic risk to the federal state.

Scale became a system only after institutions of money, standard, science, and last resort.

1945–1971: U.S. closest to broad equilibrium

USA • AFTER EQUILIBRIUM

151 → 203 million

334 → 1 535

1,33% → 2,45%

≈86% → ≈35%

population

electricity, TWt·h

R&D / GDP

Federal Debt/GDP

1950–1970

1950–1970

1953–1970; peak 2,79%

1950–1971

Mass education and housing expanded productivity and demand.

Federal missions generated NSF, NASA, DARPA and technology procurement.

Infrastructure and production grew with households.

The debt load was reduced against the background of an increase in nominal output.

Peak EQUILIBRIUM: Science, infrastructure, production, and mass demand reinforced each other.

1971–2000: Dollar and digital networks have expanded the space of choice

USA • NETWORK OPTIONALITY

203 → 281 million

1 535 → 3 802

11,0% → 25,6%

population

electricity, TWt·h

Bachelor and above

1970–2000

1970–2000

1970–2000

After abandoning gold convertibility, the U.S. monetized confidence in the dollar, capital markets, technology, and rules.

R&D held about 2,5–2,6% GDP.

Debt has risen from about 35% to 55% GDP.

Production gradually lost relative weight to finance, software and services.

Option has grown, but has become dependent on trust in rules and global networks.

2001–2019: flows remained, reproduction began to diverge

USA • GLOBAL DISBALANCES

54,5% → 105%

2,63% → 3,09%

−6,2% GDP

≈11% GDP

Federal Debt/GDP

R&D / GDP

Current Account

manufacturing

2001–2019

2001–2019

2006, maximum deficit

End of period, order

The dollar allowed to finance the deficit; the crisis of 2008 showed the price of hidden leverage and weak asset quality.

Platforms and intangible assets have enhanced global flows.

The growth in electricity demand has almost stopped, the infrastructure has aged unevenly.

Regional and social gaps undermined the overall contract.

2020–2026: US leadership remains strong, but becomes more expensive

USA • CURRENT

341,8 million

$1,009 trillion

≈4,43 PWT·h

≈121,5%

population

PPP R & D

utility-scale generation

Federal Debt/GDP

2025; 65+ ≈18,9%

2024; 3,44% GDP

2025; +Small Sun

2025

ContourCurrent PowerCurrent Limitation
Energy>103 quads; oil 13,2 million b/dNetworks and local permissions
Science29% World R&DCost of calculations and personnel
Dollar57,13% Distributed reservesEvaluative effects and geopolitics
External balanceDeficit −2,9% GDP, 2026Q1Dependence on external financing

Strengths are energy and R&D; constraints are debt, aging, and infrastructure load AI.

U.S. Balance: Option is strong, horizons are weak

USA • FINAL

AxisStrength SideLimitation
ReservesUniversities, capital, energy, technologyUneven physical infrastructure
StreamsDollar, data, finance, standardsDeficits and financial dependence
ReproductionImmigration, education, research and developmentAging and high cost of services
ResilienceAlliances and diversificationChain complexity and political polarization
LegalityCompetition of InstitutionsDifficulty of a long social contract
External effectsInnovative public goodsMilitary and financial extraterritoriality

The U.S. is quickly creating options — but harder to turn them into a long-term public contract.

Russia adds autonomy, depth of resources and ability to withstand shock

RUSSIA • THIRD CONTOUR

1896–1917

1917–1991

1991–2026

The Russian Empire

USSR

Russian Federation

Modernization of railways, banks and science; social and managerial contours did not have time to stabilize the system.

The scientific and industry system created industrial, nuclear and space power; the adaptability of the civilian circuit lagged.

Resources, defense, and fundamental school support autonomy; demography and civil commercialization limit reproduction.

Strong function: strategic autonomy and resource sustainability. Narrowing: transforming stocks into diversified civilian flows.

In the trilateral model, Russia is not a “bridge”, but an independent outline of energy, materials, the Arctic and strategic stability.

Scale, optionality and autonomy can complement each other

MEANINGS

CHINA

USA

RUSSIA

Sovereignty through

Organized development

Freedom of action through

Innovation and Networks

Sovereignty through

Autonomy and depth

RISK

RISK

RISK

Investments outpace revenues, demographics and the environment

Financial options break away from physical reproduction

Defense and resource reserve dominates the civil flow

Not a single model - compatibility of functions.

The three powers concentrate almost half of the key global flows

MASSHTAB 2024–2025

$52,83 trillion

Nominal GDP

44,6% world, 2025

≈1,89 billion

population

≈23% World Peace, 2025

Even the narrow coordination of standards and risks has a global effect.

Different years and methods; shares are shown as an order of scale.

Complementarity exists, but only with limited dependence

MAP SYNERGY

ContourUSAChinaRussiaSynergy
ScienceResearch, PO, capitalScalingElementary School, AtomIdea → system
ProductionHigh technologyCompleteness of chainsMaterials and EnergyPrice + reserve
EnergyTechnology and FinanceNetworks and cleantechResources, Atom, ArcticCommon standards
Global risksCalculations and satellitesScope of implementationStrategic stabilityPublic goods

Cooperation is useful where the result is checked, the dependence is limited, the violation is detectable, and the output is reversible.

Dividend creates four channels - and reduces two amendments

MODEL

Net₃₅ = F + 0,8 × (EL + S) + D − C

F: Prevented fragmentation

EL: Trade and Logistics

S: scientific diffusion

D: Less conflict duplication

C: Verification, adaptation, compensation

0,8: EL and S overlap deduction

Baseline: $1,001 trillion in 2035.

The basic effect of c 2035 The year - about $1 trillion Annually

SCENARIUM AND VERIFICATION

ScenarioYearNPV 2026–35
Low$0,386 trillion$1,73 trillion
Basic$1,001 trillion$4,49 trillion
High$2,072 trillion$9,29 trillion
Conservative≈$0,600 trillion≈$4,02 trillion

Protected Central Orientation: $0,6–1,0 trillion per year; NPV ≈$4,0–4,5 trillion

Strict inspection without trade and R&D: $0,779 trillion

The strongest result is a reduction in the risk of irreversible error

NON-MONITIZED USE

Nuclear escalation

Climate and methane

Pandemics

Technoavari

Hotlines, notifications, human solution in the nuclear circuit, rules AI.

Compatible measurements, satellite verification, leakage standards.

Early warning, samples, backup power and vaccine acceleration.

Incident protocols AI, space and cyber systems; recovery time measurement.

The rare risk of × catastrophic damage can not be honestly reduced to one "exact" amount - so it is shown separately.

New START The Expires February 2026; The greatest value is to reduce the likelihood of a false escalation.

Working synchronization should be modular and reversible

ARCHITECTURE

Strategic sustainability

Reproduction

Compatibility

Hotlines, notifications, space, cyberspace, rules AI and incidents.

Climate and methane, pandemics, food, the Arctic, basic science, civil atom.

Metrology, standards, emergency logistics, insurance and calculations of permitted projects.

General data set + independent verification

Phased reversible pilots

Protection of source and project intellectual property

Civil-Military Firewall and Export Control

Diversification of critical supplies

Openness to third countries under the same rules

Project criterion: the result is measurable, dependence is limited, violation is detectable, output is reversible.

Balance begins where forces stop destroying each other.

CONCLUSIONS

Scale achieved; the main limit is reproduction and feedback.

China

Option maximum; limit - long public and infrastructure contract.

USA

Autonomy is strong; the limit is a diversified civil flow.

Russia

$0,6–1,0 trillion/year - central monetary benchmark, not a guarantee.

Synchronization

Less likely nuclear, climate, pandemic and technological disaster.

Main use

Full integration is unrealistic; modular synchronization of measurable public goods is realistic and economically meaningful.

Sources cited in presentation 24

  • https://data.worldbank.org/?locations=US-CN-RU
  • https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2023/01/16/confronting-fragmentation-where-it-matters-most-trade-debt-and-climate-action
  • [/Sources]
  • https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news25_e/dgno_09apr25_e.htm
  • https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/releases/maddison-project-database-2023
  • https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202302/t20230203_1899178.html
  • https://www.stats.gov.cn/zt_18555/ztfx/qzxzgcl60zn/202303/t20230301_1920384.html
  • https://english.cas.cn/about-cas/
  • https://data.worldbank.org/country/china
  • https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202602/t20260228_1962661.html
  • https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-country
  • https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/data/tables.html
  • https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/
  • https://www.bea.gov/itable/national-gdp-and-personal-income
  • https://www.federalreservehistory.org/
  • https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsbsep20261/discovery-r-d-activity-and-research-publications-2
  • https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/
  • https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/datasets/debt-to-the-penny/debt-to-the-penny
  • https://data.worldbank.org/country/russian-federation
  • https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2026/increasing-focus-nuclear-weapons-amid-heightened-escalation-risks-new-sipri-yearbook-out-now
  • https://data.worldbank.org/?locations=1W-US-CN
  • https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.PP.CD
  • https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2026/global-military-spending-rise-continues-european-and-asian-expenditures-surge
  • https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review/resources-and-data-downloads

Published files

Analytics · Full published text

Russia’s Balances, 1896–2026

Source Status: Primary Document

A historical review of Russia’s balances in relation to the role of academic science and systems planning.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/balansy-rossii-1896-2026

Open on the site

Russian Empire • USSR • Russian Federation

The influence of the Academy of Sciences on the demographic, resource, energy, industrial and scientific-technological balance

Prepared for Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Version 1.0 • 27 August 2026

Table of contents

SectionPage
Summary for decision3
Methodology: how to read 130-year-old series4
Map of 11 epochs5
The Russian Empire, War and NEP: The Epochs of 1–36–10
USSR: Industrialization, War, Reconstruction, Maturity and Restructuring — Ages 4–811–19
Russian Federation: epochs 9–1120–25
Five through balances26–30
Influence and limits of the Academy of Sciences31–32
Academic Register and Road Map33–34
Annexes and sources35–39

All figures are provided with the indication of the territory and source; roundings are indicated by the sign ≈.

Summary for decision

Shift1897 / 1913The Soviet maximumRF: the last pointWhat it means
Urbanization13,4% the Empire; ≈15% the Russian Federation73% in RSFSR, 1989about 75%, 2025The country has become urban; the deficit has shifted from basic infrastructure to environmental quality and human resources.
Electricity≈1,94 billion KW·h, 19131 705 billion KW·h, USSR, 1988·h 1 183,9 billion, Russia, 2025The energy circuit has grown by three orders of magnitude; the boundaries of USSR and the Russian Federation are different.
Scientific staffThere was no mass≈1,49 Millions of scientists, 1985≈676 Thousands of R&D personnel, 2024The main risk is the reproduction of researchers and engineering equipment.
Demography125,64 million by empire, 1897147,0 million in the RSFSR, 1989146,03 million in the Russian Federation, 2025The size of the population is stable over a long stretch of the territory of the Russian Federation, but the age structure and natural decline worsen the balance.

Five conclusions

• Physical scale is a necessary but insufficient condition for sustainability. USSR has created huge capacities, but by 1980 the return on additional resources was decreasing.

• The most successful technological breakthroughs occurred where fundamental science, government order, project management and serial production acted as a single circuit.

• The Academy has had the strongest influence on the measurement of territory and resources, the preparation of scientific schools, the formulation of complex tasks and expertise. It could not fix monetary, price, or political imbalances on its own.

• The most severe failures were the simultaneous rupture of several circuits: 1914–1921, 1941–1945, 1988–1998. The local deficit became systemic when the synchronization of transport, money, property, and data stopped.

• For horizon 2026–2035, it is not a single index of well-being that is needed, but a register of stocks, flows, standards and stress scenarios with explicit responsibility for data and decisions.

Methodology: how to read 130-year-old series

Unit of analysis

The national balance sheet is the reconciliation of stock, flow, reproduction and risk. Eight contours are considered for each era: population, food, energy, resources, industry and capital, infrastructure, finance and external account, knowledge and technology.

StatusHow it is used
FACTNumber or event from official/primary source.
HISTORICAL INTERPRETATIONExplain the relationship of indicators; allows for alternative interpretations.
EXPERT SYNTHESISComparison of epochs within a single framework; estimates of tension are not government statistics.
PROJECT OFFERProposed monitoring architecture; not a description of the current state system.

Major Comparability Gaps

• The territory: the census of 1897 did not include Finland; the Soviet ranks of 1913 are often recalculated within the future boundaries of USSR.

• Population: early censuses used the available population, later - permanent; the definition of the city changed.

• Prices: gold, Soviet and modern ruble are not comparable without special reconstructions. Preference is given to physical quantities.

• Science: "scientists" USSR and "R&D personnel" of the Russian Federation are close, but not identical in scope.

• Causality: The participation of the Academy is separated from the decision of the state and from the actual industrial effect.

Estimated accents

Electricity USSR has grown from 1,94 billion KW·H in 1913 the Year 1 705 billion KW·H in 1988 year, approximately in 879 One. This factor shows the scale of energy consumption, but does not measure well-being and is not transferred to the Russian Federation after 1991 years.

Map of 11 epochs

PeriodEpochDominant logic of balance
1896–1913Imperial ModernizationRapid growth of the upper industrial and financial contours in a predominantly rural and illiterate society.
1914–1921War, Revolution and the Breakup of Economic RelationsMobilization destroyed the gold money regime, and then a single circuit of supply, transport and property.
1922–1928NEP and RecoveryThe return of limited market incentives restored the exchange between the countryside and the city; energy became the first nationwide balance.
1929–1940Forced industrializationThe state concentrated investments in heavy industry and energy, taking a high social and agricultural price.
1941–1945Military-mobilization balanceThe main criterion was not the maximization of output, but the preservation of critical functions with the loss of territory, people and capacities.
1946–1964Recovery and technological breakthroughThe reconstruction of the industry coincided with the creation of nuclear, rocket and space and mass educational contours.
1965–1985Mature USSR: scale and decreasing efficiencyThe material and scientific scale reached a maximum, but the return on additional resources decreased, and the consumer and innovative contours lagged behind.
1986–1991Restructuring and disintegration of a single contourAttempting to change incentives without a sustainable price, property, and inter-republic settlement architecture has turned hidden imbalances into open ones.
1992–1999Transition shock of the Russian FederationMarket institutions were created simultaneously with the collapse of demand, cooperation, budget and scientific and production ties.
2000–2013Stabilization and resource and financial strengtheningHigh export earnings, tax centralization and capacity utilization have restored macroeconomic and social balances.
2014–2026Adaptation and structural turnThe economy remains resilient to external shocks but faces demographic contraction, staffing constraints and the challenge of technological autonomy.

Periodization principle: the boundary of the epoch is put where the mechanism of resource coordination changes - monetary regime, property, planning, mobilization, external contour or the architecture of science.

1. 1896–1913 Imperial modernization

Numerical passport of the era

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Population125,64 millionRussian Empire without Finland, census 1897[S01]
Urban population13,4%Russian Empire, 1897[S04]
Literacy21,1%; male 29,3%, female 13,1%Russian Empire, 1897[S04]
Life expectancy≈30,5 yearsRussian territory, 1896–1897; historical assessment[S04]
Grain≈50,5 million tons; about 560 kg per personRussia, 1913; rounded[S04]
Electricity≈1,94 billion KW·hUSSR in future borders, 1913[S08]
Coal29,2 mln tUSSR in future borders, 1913[S07]

1. 1896–1913 Numerical passport — continuation

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Oil≈10,3 million tonsUSSR in future borders, 1913[S07]
Steel≈4,2 million tonsUSSR in future borders, 1913[S07]
Railways≈70,2 thousand kmRussian Empire, 1913/14[S36]
Balance of the State Bank3,041 billion rub.; gold 1,695 billion rub.by 1 January 1914[S06]

Role of the Academy of Sciences

The Academy created maps, classifications, scientific schools and resource exploration. V 1910 The Radiation Commission was established in the 1915 KEPS: prototype of a bundle "resource register - scientific expertise - state order".

The National Balance

2. 1914–1921 War, revolution and disintegration of economic relations

Numerical passport of the era

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Population91,0 millionterritory of modern Russia, rating 1917[S03]
Urban share17%territory of modern Russia, 1917[S03]
The Gold ExchangeTerminatedfrom July 1914[S05]
Large industry≈14% from the level 1913RSFSR/USSR, 1920; historical evaluation[S09]
Electricitynear 0,5 billion KW·hterritory of the RSFSR/USSR, 1920; rounded[S08]
Grain≈50,5 → 34,0 million tonsthe Russian Territory: 1913 → 1922; −33%[S04]
Income per soul<50% Levels 19131919; historical reconstruction[S09]
The railway systempeak overload and rupturesquality total, 1916–1921[S36]
KEPScreated in 1915Academy of Sciences[S11]

Role of the Academy of Sciences

KEPS searched for strategic raw materials and coordinated specialists, but did not manage the budget, transport or distribution. Its most important effect was postponed: institutional groundwork passed into the Soviet period.

The National Balance

3. 1922–1928 NEP and Recovery

Numerical passport of the era

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Population92,7 millionterritory of modern Russia, census 1926[S03]
Urban share18%territory of modern Russia, 1926[S03]
Life expectancy≈42,9 yearsterritory of Russia, 1926–1927[S04]
Grain34,0 → 50,0 million tonsthe Russian Territory: 1922 → 1928; +47%[S04]
Electricity5,0 billion KW·hUSSR, 1928; 2,6 times to 1913[S08]
Coal35,5 mln tUSSR, 1928[S09]
Oil11,6 mln tUSSR, 1928[S09]

3. 1922–1928 Numerical passport — continuation

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Steel4,3 mln tUSSR, 1928[S09]
GOELRO1,75 million kW according to plan; 2,56 million kW commissionedNew Power Plants[S10]
Universities248; 216,7 Thousands of studentsUSSR, 1922/23 academic year[S15]

Role of the Academy of Sciences

The KEPS and its resulting Council for the Study of Productive Forces linked geology, industrial location, and electrification. The KEPS/SOPS subsequently established 16 institutes.

The National Balance

4. 1929–1940 Forced Industrialization

Numerical passport of the era

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Electricity5,0 → 13,5 → 36,2 → 48,3 billion KW·hUSSR: 1928 / 1932 / 1937 / 1940[S08]
Coal35,5 → 64,4 → 128 → 166 million tonsUSSR: 1928 / 1932 / 1937 / 1940[S09]
Oil11,6 → 21,4 → 28,5 → 31,1 million tonsUSSR: 1928 / 1932 / 1937 / 1940[S09]
Steel4,3 → 5,9 → 17,7 → 18,3 million tonsUSSR: 1928 / 1932 / 1937 / 1940[S09]
Grain47,5 → 70,4 → 55,6 million tonsterritory of Russia: 1932 / 1937 / 1940[S04]
Population108,4 millionterritory of modern Russia, census 1939[S03]
Urban share33%territory of modern Russia, 1939[S03]
University students811,7 thousand.USSR, 1940/41 academic year[S15]
Institutional shiftThe Academy moved to Moscow; branch offices1934–1935[S20]

Role of the Academy of Sciences

Academic expeditions and institutions have reduced uncertainty on raw materials, energy, metallurgy, and placement. The scientific network became part of the planned circuit, but decisions about the pace and price of industrialization were made politically.

The National Balance

5. 1941–1945 Military mobilization balance

Numerical passport of the era

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Total demographic losses≈26,6 million peopleUSSR, official estimate[S14]
Population of RSFSR≈111,0 → 97,6 million1941 → Home 1946; evaluation[S14]
Grain55,6 → 25,4 million tonsthe Russian Territory: 1940 → 1945; −54%[S04]
GDP≈66% / 83% Levels 1940USSR: 1942 / 1945; reconstruction[S09]
Release of weapons≈251% Levels 1940USSR, 1944; index[S09]
Electricity48,3 → 43,3 billion KW·hUSSR: 1940 → 1945[S08]
Oil31,1 → 19,4 million tonsUSSR: 1940 → 1945[S09]

5. 1941–1945 Numerical passport — continuation

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Steel18,3 → 12,3 million tonsUSSR: 1940 → 1945[S09]
FTI: The Primary Flow of Ideas847 Proposals for the first 2 MonthsCommission led by N. N. Semenova, 1941[S13]
Impulse radar "Redout"detection range up to 150 kmthe School of Physics and Technology[S13]
FTI in Kazan8 from 18 laboratories; about 70 employeesEvacuation 1941[S13]
FTI Dissertations38: 10 PhD and 28 PhD1941–1945[S13]

Role of the Academy of Sciences

The Academy provided a fast cycle of "task front - laboratory solution - implementation": demagnetization of ships, radar, ice track safety, medicine, nuclear reserve. These are testable cases, not grounds for attributing the entire military result to science.

The National Balance

Verified case: FTI during the war

Summer 1941 the FTI 's 18 Laboratories and more 300 staff. Commission led by N. N. Semenova 847 proposals in the first two months. In Kazan evacuated 8 laboratories and about 70 employees; in the Leningrad group remained 103 Human. The results included demagnetization of ships, pulse radar and devices for safe driving on the ice trackS13].

6. 1946–1964 Recovery and technological breakthrough

Numerical passport of the era

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Electricity43,3 → 91,2 → near 292 billion KW·hUSSR: 1945 / 1950 / 1960[S08]
Oil19,4 → 37,9 → 147,9 million tonsUSSR: 1945 / 1950 / 1960[S09]
Steel12,3 → 27,3 → near 65 million tonsUSSR: 1945 / 1950 / 1960[S09]
Electricity of RSFSR63,4 → 304,6 billion KW·h1950 → 1964; ×4,8[S15]
Grain46,8 → 83,2 million tonsterritory of Russia: 1950 → 1964[S04]
Population117,2 millionterritory of modern Russia, census 1959[S03]
Urban share52%territory of modern Russia, 1959[S03]

6. 1946–1964 Numerical passport — continuation

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Life expectancy≈67,9 → 69,6 yearsRussia: 1958/59 → 1964/65[S04]
Reactor F-1Start 25 December 1946The first uranium-graphite reactor in Eurasia[S18]
Sputnik / Gagarin1957 / 1961USSR[S19]
Siberian Branch of AN USSRcreated in 1957New territorial model of science[S17]

Role of the Academy of Sciences

The academic environment was at the core of cross-industry projects: physics, mathematics, chemistry, materials science and geology combined with closed KB and industry. The creation of SO AN USSR brought the research closer to the resource base of Siberia.

The National Balance

7. 1965–1985 Mature USSR: scale and decreasing efficiency

Numerical passport of the era

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Electricity507 → 1 039 → 1 544 billion KW·hUSSR: 1965 / 1975 / 1985[S15]
Oil243 → near 491 → near 595 million tonsUSSR: 1965 / 1975 / 1985[S15]
Coal578 → near 701 → near 726 million tonsUSSR: 1965 / 1975 / 1985[S15]
Steel91 → near 141 → near 155 million tonsUSSR: 1965 / 1975 / 1985[S15]
Electricity of RSFSR332,8 → 962 billion KW·h1965 → 1985; ×2,9[S15]
Life expectancy≈69,5 → 68,1 yearsRSFSR: 1965 → 1985[S04]
Import of grain45,5 mln tUSSR, 1984[S15]

7. 1965–1985 Numerical passport — continuation

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Fuel and raw materials in export≈16% → 54%USSR: 1960 → 1985[S15]
Population of RSFSR129,9 → 137,4 → 147,0 millionCensus 1970 / 1979 / 1989[S03]
Urban share of RSFSR62% → 69% → 73%1970 / 1979 / 1989[S03]
Science workers664,6 thousands. → 1 223,4 thousands. → near 1 491 thousands.USSR: 1965 / 1975 / 1985[S16]
University students4,58 millionUSSR, 1970[S15]
Average annual growth of national income7,5% → 5,8% → 3,8%8th / 9th / 10th Five-Year Plans[S15]

Role of the Academy of Sciences

The Academy provided a fundamental base of defense, space, energy and geological programs. The weak link was the transition from the result of the institute to mass civil technology and productivity.

The National Balance

8. 1986–1991 Alteration and decay of a single contour

Numerical passport of the era

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Electricity1 544 → 1 705 billion KW·hUSSR: 1985 → 1988; then stagnation[S15]
Oilnear 595 → 624 million tonsUSSR: 1985 → 1988; then decline[S15]
Science workersabout 1,49 millionUSSR, 1985; system peak[S16]
Population savingsnear 230 billion rub.deposits in savings banks, 1985; nominal value[S15]
Population of RSFSR147,0 millionCensus 1989[S03]
Urban share of RSFSR73%Census 1989[S03]
Life expectancy≈70,1 yearsRSFSR, 1986–1987[S04]

8. 1986–1991 Numerical passport — continuation

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Electricity of RSFSR≈1 082 billion KW·h1990[S15]
Grain≈116,7 million tonsRSFSR, 1990[S04]
RASrestored by decree 21 November 1991institutional continuity[S21]

Role of the Academy of Sciences

The scientific complex remained large, but depended on the federal budget, customers and chains of cooperation. The Academy could diagnose problems, but not replace the mechanism of prices, budget and political coordination.

The National Balance

9. 1992–1999 Transition shock of the Russian Federation

Numerical passport of the era

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
CPI≈2 508,8%Russia, 1992 to 1991[S24]
Real GDPdecrease of approximately 40%Russia, 1991–1998; order of magnitude[S23]
Populationnear 147 million → 146,3 millionRussia, beginning and end of the decade[S03]
Life expectancy64,0 → 65,9 yearsRussia: 1994 → 1999[S25]
Grain116,7 → 47,8 million tonsRussia: 1990 → 1998; −59%[S04]
Researchers992,6 → 425,9 thousands.Russia: 1990 → 2000; −57%; separate category[S30]
R&D staff1 061 thousandRussia, 1995[S30]

9. 1992–1999 Numerical passport — continuation

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Oil productionabout 305 million tonsRussia, minimum end 1990-x[S32]
Electricitynear 846 billion KW·hRussia, 1998; rounded[S32]
International reservesabout 12,5 billion dollarsRussia, end 1999; order of magnitude[S33]
RASlegal status restored to 1991Russia[S21]

Role of the Academy of Sciences

The Academy has maintained schools and continuity with a sharp reduction in funding and staff outflows. Its contribution of the period is the preservation of a critical mass of competencies, and not compensation for the macroeconomic recession.

The National Balance

10. 2000–2013 Stabilization and resource and financial strengthening

Numerical passport of the era

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Average GDP growth≈6,9% per yearRussia, 1999–2008[S23]
Oil production≈305 → 523 million tonsRussia, 1999 → 2013[S32]
Electricity≈878 → 1 059 billion KW·hRussia, 2000 → 2013; +21%[S32]
Grain65,4 → 92,4 million tonsRussia: 2000 → 2013; +41%[S04]
Life expectancy≈65,3 → 70,8 yearsRussia, 2000 → 2013[S25]
Total fertility rate1,20 → 1,71Russia: 2000 → 2013[S25]
Poverty29,0% → near 10,8%Russia, 2000 → 2013[S27]

10. 2000–2013 Numerical passport — continuation

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
International reserves≈12,5 → 510 billion dollarsEnd 1999 → End 2013; Rounded[S33]
Public debt55,9% → 12,7% GDPRussia: 2000 → 2013[S33]
R&D staff≈888 → 727 thousands.Russia, 2000 → 2013[S30]
Urban share73% → 74%Census 2002 → 2010[S03]

Role of the Academy of Sciences

The RAS maintained a fundamental school and expert function, but the gap between research, universities, public corporations, and private business remained significant.

The National Balance

11. 2014–2026 Adaptation and structural rotation

Numerical passport of the era

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Average GDP growth≈0,9% per yearRussia, 2014–2019[S23]
GDP growth by year−1,4%; +4,1%; near +4–5%; +1,0%2022 / 2023 / 2024 / 2025; the 2024 figure was revised[S23]
GDP growth≈1,0%Russia, 2025; first estimate[S23]
Population146,03 millionRussia, at 1 January 2025[S25]
Birth / Death1,222 / 1,819 millionRussia, 2024[S26]
Total fertility rate≈1,4Russia, 2024[S26]
Life expectancy73,34 → 70,06 → 73,41 yearsRussia: 2019 / 2021 / 2023[S25]

11. 2014–2026 Numerical passport — continuation

IndicatorNumberCoverage and dateSource
Grain92,4 → 125,9 million tonsRussia: 2013 → 2024[S04]
Poverty6,7%Russia, 2025; new technique after 2021[S28]
R&D staffabout 676 thousand.Russia, 2024[S29]
Domestic R & D costs0,97% GDPRussia, 2024[S31]
Electricity1 183,9 billion KW·hRussia, 2025[S32]
Oil / Gas / Coal511,5 million tons / 663,3 billion m³ / 440 million tonsRussia, 2025[S32]
Examination of the RAS>80 Thousands of conclusions; 661 Organizationlast reporting year[S35]

Role of the Academy of Sciences

After the reform of 2013, the RAS does not manage most of the institutes as before, but remains a center of expertise, coordination and scientific representation. The scale of the examination is more than 80 thousand conclusions for more than 1 000 organizations, including 661 institute and university.

The National Balance

End-to-end balance 1. Population and urbanization

Sources: Rosstat [S03], [S25]. The series refers to the territory of modern Russia; the early points have been reconstructed. The proportion of 2025 is rounded.

A long trend is the transition from rural to urban society. After the 1990s, the population hovers around 143–147 million, but the birthrate of 1,222 million versus 1,819 million deaths in 2024 shows a reproduction deficit. Therefore, the stability of the total population is not equal to the demographic balance.

End-to-end balance 2. Energy as a system framework

Sources: historical series [S08], [S15]; modern results [S32]. Rows USSR and the Russian Federation are divided due to the territorial gap.

GOELRO was not just a plan for power plants: it linked the location of productive forces, fuel, networks and industrial hubs. K 2025 the Russian Federation 1 183,9 billion KW·h at the installed capacity 270,3 GWh. Modern risk has shifted from absolute power shortage to reliability of networks, equipment and availability of power for new industries.

End-to-end balance 3. Physical scale of the industry

Sources: [S07]–[S09], [S15] Index 1913 = 100; logarithmic scale; Soviet recalculations 1913 Years in the Future Frontiers USSR.

K 1985 Electricity production was approximately 796 times higher 1913 Oil, about a year 58 once, became — in 37 Once, coal in 25 One. The pace difference shows the change of the technological core: from the coal-metallurgical base to the oil and gas and electric power system.

End-to-end balance 4. Scientific staff

Sources: [S16], [S29], [S30]. The indicators differ in methodology, so the panels are not connected.

V USSR The number of scientists has more than doubled 1965 and 1985 years. R&D staff in Russia has declined 1,061 Millions in 1995 Year to approximately 676 thousands in 2024 the Year - in 36%. At the cost 0,97% GDP in 2024 Quantitative reproduction of the research circuit remains a limitation.

End-to-end balance 5. Where the tension builds up

Expert synthesis of the author based on numerical passports. This is not an official statistical index.

Critical epochs coincide with the loss of coordination of several systems at once. In the years 1914–1921 and 1992–1999, the financial and institutional gap increased production. In 1941–1945, the external threat was maximum, but centralized mobilization retained the controllability of critical flows.

How the Academy of Sciences Affected National Balance Sheets

ChannelMechanismBalanced effectExample
Measurementcensuses, maps, classifications, standardsReducing errors in resource and spatial planningKEPS, expeditions
Resource baseGeology, mineralogy, soil scienceOpening and evaluation of stocksKola Peninsula, CMA, Siberia
Energyphysics, energy, materialstechnology selection and placementGOELRO, nuclear power
Defencemathematics, physics, chemistry, medicineReducing the cycle from task to implementationdemagnetization, radar, nuclear project
Human capitalScientific Schools and Postgraduate StudiesReproduction of researchersFTI, SO AN USSR
Territorial developmentIntegrated programsLinking science with the resource regionSiberian Branch
ExpertiseProgramme and outcome evaluationquality of solutions and project filtering>80 thousand conclusions in the last report
Cultural Capitallanguages, history, archives, collectionsPreservation of identity and memoryPushkin House, archives

Eight institutional milestones

YearVekahModification of the mechanism
1915KEPSTransition from discipline to economic problem
1925AN USSRinclusion of the Academy in the Union planning system
1934–1935Moscow and branch officesConvergence with central management and industrial tasks
1941–1945Military mobilization of scienceshort cycle of implementation
1943–1946Laboratory No. 2 and F-1the Nuclear Technology Outline
1957SB AN USSRterritorial decentralization of the scientific network
1991Rebuilding the RASlegal continuity after dissolution USSR
2013–2026Reform and Expert ModelTransition from direct management of institutions to coordination and expertise

Limits of Academic Influence

• Academy does not set prices, taxes and interest rates; therefore, it is not able to restore the cash balance on its own.

• Scientific discovery is not equal to implementation: we need a customer, pilot production, standards, capital and responsibility for the serial result.

• The Academy is not the whole science of the country. Universities, industry institutes, design bureaus, factory laboratories and departmental services have independent contributions.

• A strong dependence on the budget and personnel policy makes the Academy both a pillar of the state and a vulnerable part of the long investment cycle.

• Quantitative metrics of publications and conclusions do not replace estimates of the real technological effect.

Project proposal: Academic Register of National Balance Sheets

LayerWhat is storedQuality controlUser
Reservespopulation, capacity, reserves of raw materials, fixed assets, scientific equipmentsingle date and territory of assessmentGovernment, regions, corporations
Streamsenergy, water, food, investment, personnel, import of technologiesmaterial and monetary unitsIndustry Headquarters
Normsminimum security, reserve, recovery periodscientific expertise and open methodologyRegulators
Scriptssanctions, climate, accidents, demography, technological gapStress test and sensitivitySecurity Council, Government
Decisionsresponsible, time, budget, expected effectsubsequent verification of resultProject Offices

Minimum set of indicators

• Demographics: population by age, healthy life expectancy, migration, availability of key professions.

• Energy and resources: available capacity, network constraints, inventory by category, time of development and import dependence of equipment.

• Food and water: release, shifting stocks, logistics, regional deficits, climate sensitivity.

• Science and technology: age researchers, equipment, critical competencies, time from result to series.

• Finance: investment, long credit, external account, budget sensitivity to raw material prices.

Road map 2026–2035

HorizonActionMeasurable result
0–90 daysApprove 40–60 key balances and data passports; choose three pilots.A single catalog of indicators, owners and quality gaps.
3–12 monthsPilots: scientific personnel and equipment; electricity for new industrial units; food and water balance.Three stress tests and a list of solutions with a budget and responsible.
1–3 yearsIntegrate regional and industry showcases; introduce independent academic verification.Regular report on stocks, flows and risks.
3–10 yearsLink the register with the investment cycle, state programs and technological projects.Reduction of reaction time and share of projects without providing a resource.

The First Three Pilots

Annex 1. Population control points

YearTotal, millionCity, millionUrban shareNote
189767,59,9≈15%territory of the modern Russian Federation; available population
191489,915,717%Assessment within current boundaries
191791,015,517%Assessment within current boundaries
192692,716,418%census; available population
1939108,436,333%census; available population
1959117,261,152%Census; permanent population
1970129,980,662%Census
1979137,494,969%Census
1989147,0107,973%Census
2002145,2106,473%Census
2010142,9105,374%Census
2025146,03—about 75%Ongoing assessment; Crimea and Sevastopol are taken into account according to the Rosstat method

Source: [S03], [S25]. Values are rounded; by 1959, the type of population accounting is changing.

Annex 2. Electricity and base industry USSR

YearElectricity, billion KW·hCoal, million tonsOil, million tonsSteel, million tons
19131,9429,210,34,2
19285,035,511,64,3
193213,564,421,45,9
193736,212828,517,7
194048,316631,118,3
194543,3≈14919,412,3
195091,2≈26137,927,3
196550757824391
19751 039≈701≈491≈141
19851 544≈726≈595≈155
19881 705≈772624≈163

Sources: [S07]–[S09], [S15] Sign ≈ means the rounding or rounding of close official rows. Point 1913 Usually counted in future borders USSR.

Annex 3. Scientific personnel and institutional points

YearIndicatorValueCoverage
1965Science Workers664,6 thousand.USSR
1970Science Workers927,7 thousand.USSR
1975Science Workers1 223,4 thousandUSSR
1985Science Workers≈1 491 thousands.USSR
1995R&D staff1 061 thousandRussian Federation
2000R&D staff≈888 thousands.Russian Federation
2010R&D staff≈737 thousands.Russian Federation
2024R&D staff≈676 thousands.Russian Federation
2024R & D costs0,97% GDPRussian Federation
Latest ReportExpert Opinions of the RAS>80 thousands.for >1 000 organizations

Sources: [S16], [S29], [S31], [S35]. The Soviet and Russian indicators are not completely identical.

Annex 4. Sources

Priority is given to official statistics, primary historical collections and materials of state scientific organizations. The links are checked for the date of preparation.

[S01] First general census of the Russian Empire: the original codex of the Central Committee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

[S02] Presidential Library: First Census 1897

[S03] Rosstat: historical number and share of urban population in the territory of modern Russia

[S04] Rosstat: census history, literacy and infrastructure

[S05] Bank of Russia: History of the Monetary System and the State Bank

[S06] Bulletin of the Bank of Russia: State Bank balance sheet and gold at 1 January 1914

[S07] MSU: database on Russian industry and USSR

[S08] Isthmath: electricity production USSR, 1913–1950

[S09] National economy USSR: industry, historical series up to 1955 years

[S10] Ministry of Energy of Russia: history of GOELRO plan

[S11] Presidential Library: Creation of KEPS

[S12] RAS: KEPS, Council for the Study of Productive Forces and Established Institutions

[S13] RAS: The Great Patriotic War in the history of FTI

[S14] Rosstat: "Victory figures"

[S15] National economy USSR in 1987: official statistical yearbook

[S16] Isthmat: number of scientists USSR

[S17] Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: history of creation

[S18] Research Center "Kurchatov Institute": the history of Laboratory No 2

[S19] Roscosmos: the key dates of domestic space exploration

[S20] RAS: 300 years of history, institutional changes of the Academy

[S21] RAS: statute and general provisions; restoration of RAS in 1991

[S22] Federal Law No. 253-FZ of 27.09.2013

[S23] Rosstat: National Accounts and GDP Dynamics

[S24] Rosstat: prices and inflation

[S25] Rosstat: demography

[S26] Rosstat: natural population movement for the year 2024

[S27] Rosstat: historical indicators of poverty

[S28] Rosstat: preliminary poverty assessment for the year 2025

[S29] Rosstat: science, innovation and technology

[S30] Rosstat: a historical series of personnel engaged in research and development

[S31] HSE ISSEZ: Research and Development Costs in 2024

[S32] Ministry of Energy of Russia: results of fuel and energy sector activity for 2025 year

[S33] Bank of Russia: international reserves of the Russian Federation

[S34] Bank of Russia: balance of payments of the Russian Federation

[S35] RAS: report on the activities and scale of scientific expertise

[S36] Russian Railways: the history of the Trans-Siberian Railway

Other published edition: 130 Balansy_Rossii_1896-2026_Akademiya_nauk.pptx · Web Text +

Balances of Russia for 130 years

YEARS

1896–2026

11 EPOH

Russian Empire • USSR • Russian Federation

5 THROUGH BALANCES

The influence of the Academy of Sciences on demographic, resource, energy, industrial and scientific-technological balances

The key question is: how did scientific knowledge become a state capacity?

Prepared for Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

27 August 2026

For 130 years, the system changed - the task remained

SUMMARY FOR DECISIONS

To reconcile supply, flow, reproduction, and risk in different institutional regimes.

→ 1,061 676 thousand

13,4% → ≈75%

1,94 → 1 705

urban share

billion KW·h

R&D staff

Empire 1897 → Russian Federation 2025; Different boundaries

USSR: 1913 → 1988; Increase approximately ×879

Russian Federation: 1995 → 2024; near −36%

The Academy was most influential where it reduced uncertainty, created scientific schools and was built into the contours of task setting, ordering and implementation.

Crises arose with the simultaneous rupture of money, transport, property and data.

The scale of the industry itself did not guarantee efficiency and reproduction.

The current deficit is people, research personnel, equipment and long technological chains.

Three statistical bands - without false gluing

METHODICS

EMPIRE

USSR

RSFSR / RF

1897 / 1913

1926–1990

1959–2025

Census, State Bank balance sheet, industry estimates

USSR as a whole and individual points of the RSFSR

Censuses, Rosstat, Bank of Russia, R&D

Last implemented points on the cut August 2026: population — 1 January 2025; GDP — 2025; Electricity and R & D — 2024.

Do not connect: USSR 1990 with RF 1990; USSR with R&D staff of the Russian Federation; different age definitions of literacy.

One horizon - 11 different balance mechanisms

MAP EPOH

1896–1913

1914–1921

1922–1928

1929–1940

Imperial Modernization

War and Disintegration

NEP

Industrialization

Money + Railways

Mobilization + gap

Market + GOELRO

Plan + Heavy Industry

1941–1945

1946–1964

1965–1985

1986–1991

Military Balance

Recovery

Mature USSR

Alteration

Maximizing the release

atom + space + Siberia

scale > efficiency

Incentives without prices

1992–1999

2000–2013

2014–2026

Transition shock

Stabilisation

Adaptation

market + demand breakdown

Revenues + reserves

sustainability + personnel shortage

The boundary of the era is set where the way of harmonizing resources has changed: money, property, planning, mobilization or external contour.

1896–1913 | Imperial Modernization

NUMBER AGE PASSPORT

Rapid growth of industrial and financial contours in a predominantly rural and illiterate society.

125,64 million

13,4%

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

Maps, classifications, resource intelligence. Radiation Commission — 1910; KEPS - 1915: prototype of a bundle "resource register - examination - state order".

population

urban share

Empire without Finland, 1897

Empire, 1897

21,1%

≈1,94 billion

literacy

kW·h

Monetary and railway modernization did not have time to close the shortage of mass education, energy and management information.

male 29,3%; female 13,1%

Future boundaries USSR, 1913

3,041 billion rub.

≈70,2 thousand km

State Bank balance sheet; gold 1,695 billion rub., 1.01.1914

Railways of the Empire, 1913/14

1914–1921 | War, Revolution and the Breakup of Ties

NUMBER AGE PASSPORT

At the same time, the money anchor, transport synchronization, property and statistical controllability broke down.

≈0,5 billion

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

KEPS was looking for strategic raw materials and brought together specialists. The contribution was important, but could not replace the budget, transport, supply and political coordination.

large industry

kW·h

from level 1913 to 1920

rounded score 1920

50,5 → 34 million tons

Grain

income per person

The crisis turned out to be systemic: the fall in output was exacerbated by the gap between money, logistics and institutions.

1913 → 1922; near −33%

from level 1913 to 1919

91,0 million

July 1914

population within the boundaries of modern Russia, estimate 1917

the Golden Exchange

1922–1928 | NEP and Recovery

NUMBER AGE PASSPORT

Limited market incentives restored the exchange; energy became the first nationwide balance sheet.

34 → 50 million tons

5,0 billion

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

KEPS and the SOPS that grew out of it linked geology, industrial location, and electrification; new institutions and resource schools emerged.

Grain

kW·h

1922 → 1928; near +47%

USSR, 1928

35,5 mln t

11,6 mln t

coal

Oil

By 1928, physical volumes had returned to roughly pre-war levels, but the balance remained vulnerable to prices and incentives.

USSR, 1928

USSR, 1928

1,75 mln kW

2,56 mln kW

the GOELRO Plan

In fact, new capacities have been introduced.

1929–1940 | Forced industrialization

NUMBER AGE PASSPORT

The state directed resources to heavy industry and energy, taking a high social and agricultural price.

5,0 → 48,3

35,5 → 166

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

Expeditions and institutions reduced uncertainty about raw materials, energy, and location. The scientific network became part of the planned outline, but did not define its goals.

billion KW·h

million tons of coal

USSR, 1928 → 1940; ×9,7

USSR, 1928 → 1940; ×4,7

4,3 → 18,3

18% → 33%

million tons of steel

urban share

Over 12 years, energy has increased by almost 10 times, steel - more than 4 times; the defense capability has increased at the cost of agricultural and consumer stresses.

USSR, 1928 → 1940; ×4,3

Territory of Modern Russia, 1926 → 1939

216,7 → 811,7 thousands.

47,5 → 55,6 million tons

University students, 1928 → 1940

Grain: growth noticeably weaker than industry

1941–1945 | Military-mobilization balance

NUMBER AGE PASSPORT

The criterion was not efficiency, but maximization of output and preservation of critical functions with the loss of territory, people and capacities.

≈26,6 million

55,6 → 25,4

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

FTI gave a test cycle "task front - laboratory - implementation": demagnetization of ships, radar, ice track. Science retained critical functions, but not the entire issue.

Demographic losses

million tons of grain

USSR, official estimate

the Russian Territory, 1940 → 1945

48,3 → 43,3

18,3 → 12,3

billion KW·h

million tons of steel

Centralized mobilization retained the controllability of critical flows, but the price was expressed primarily in human losses.

USSR, 1940 → 1945

USSR, 1940 → 1945

18 Laboratories

The FTI Commission considered the proposals for the first two months

and more than 300 FTI employees in summer 1941

43,3 → 292

NUMBER AGE PASSPORT

1946–1964 | Recovery and technological breakthrough

The reconstruction of the industry coincided with the creation of nuclear, rocket and space and mass educational contours.

19,4 → 147,9

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

Physics, mathematics, chemistry and materials science formed the basis of the atomic and space projects. In 1957 Siberian branch was created - science approached the resource base.

billion KW·h

million tons of oil

USSR, 1945 → 1960

USSR, 1945 → 1960

12,3 → ≈65

million tons of steel

urban share

The recovery has moved into technological expansion; the strongest asset was a combination of science, education, industry research and serial production.

USSR, 1945 → 1960

RSFSR, census 1959

25.12.1946

1957 / 1961

Launch of the first reactor F-1

Gagarin's Satellite / Flight

507 → 1 544

NUMBER AGE PASSPORT

1965–1985 | Mature USSR: scale and decreasing efficiency

The material and scientific scale peaked, but returns to capital, resource renewal, and consumer balance deteriorated.

243 → ≈595

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

The fundamental base of defense, space and energy programs was strong. Weaker worked the transition from the result of the institute to mass civil technology.

billion KW·h

million tons of oil

USSR, 1965 → 1985; ×3,0

USSR, 1965 → 1985

664,6 thousands. → ≈1,49 million

7,5% → 3,8%

growth of national income

Science Workers

The economy has accumulated enormous capacity and human capital, but the flow of efficiency has slowed: the scale has not compensated for weak incentives and a long implementation cycle.

average pace: 8- I am → 10- I'm a five-year-old

USSR, 1965 → 1985

45,5 mln t

16% → 54%

grain imports in 1984

Fuel and raw materials in export, 1960 → 1985

1 544 → 1 705

NUMBER AGE PASSPORT

1986–1991 | Restructuring and disintegration of a single contour

The attempt to change incentives without a stable architecture of prices, property and inter-republican settlements turned hidden imbalances into open ones.

≈595 → 624

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

The scientific complex remained large, but depended on the federal budget, customers and chains of cooperation. The Academy could diagnose the problem, but not replace the price mechanism and political alignment.

billion KW·h

million tons of oil

USSR, 1985 → 1988; power reserve

USSR, 1985 → 1988

≈1,49 million

≈230 billion rub.

Science Workers

Savings of population

Stocks of productive and scientific capital were large, but monetary, commodity and institutional flows ceased to be consistent.

USSR, 1985; system peak

USSR, nominally to 1990

147,0 million

Population of the RSFSR, census 1989

urban share of the RSFSR, 1989

2 508,8%

NUMBER AGE PASSPORT

1992–1999 | Transition shock of the Russian Federation

The market and private property were created simultaneously with the collapse of demand, cooperation, budget and scientific and production ties.

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

The RAS has maintained schools and continuity with a sharp contraction of funding and outflow of personnel. Its contribution is to preserve a critical mass of competencies, not to compensate for macroshock.

inflation

Real GDP

Russia, 1992

Russia, 1991–1998; order of magnitude

116,7 → 47,8

992,6 → 425,9 thousands.

million tons of grain

researchers

Price mechanism and private property emerged faster than long-term capital, trust and the system of scientific order; financial stabilization had a high social price.

RSFSR/RF, 1990 → 1998

Russia, 1990 → 2000

1,061 million

12,5 billion dollars

R&D personnel in the year 1995

international reserves by end 1999

≈6,9% per year

NUMBER AGE PASSPORT

2000–2013 | Stabilization and resource and financial strengthening

Export earnings, tax centralization, and capacity utilization quickly restored macro-resilience and social balance.

305 → 523

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

The RAS maintained fundamental schools and expertise, but the link between research and universities, corporations, and private business remained uneven.

GDP growth

million tons of oil

Russia, 1999–2008

Russia, 1999 → 2013

12,5 → ≈510

65,3 → 70,8

billion reserves

OPG years

Revenues and financial reserves increased sharply, while the budget’s dependence on the future price of oil and the reproduction of the research circuit decreased.

End 1999 → End 2013

Russia, 2000 → 2013

29% → 10,8%

≈888 → 727 thousands.

Poverty, 2000 → 2013

R&D staff, 2000 → 2013

2014–2026 | Adaptation and structural turn

NUMBER AGE PASSPORT

The economy remains resilient to external shocks but faces demographic contraction, staffing constraints and the challenge of technological autonomy.

−1,4 / +4,1 / +4,9 / +1,0

0,9% per year

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

After the reform of 2013, the RAS does not manage most institutions, but strengthens expertise and coordination. The latest report: more than 80 thousand conclusions for more than 1 000 organizations.

Average GDP growth

GDP growth

Russia, 2014–2019

2022 / 2023 / 2024 / 2025

1,222 / 1,819 million

0,97% GDP

Birth / Death

Internal R&D costs

Short-term adaptability is high; long-term risk is concentrated in the reproduction of populations, researchers, equipment, and civilian technology chains.

Russia, 2024

Russia, 2024

146,03 million

675,7 / 699,9 thousand

Population at 1 January 2025

R&D staff: traditional/extended coverage, 2024

Urbanization completed - no reproduction

PASSING BALANCE • POPULATION

67,5 → 146,0 million

population

Retrospective territory of Russia

≈15% → 75,1%

urban share

1897 → 2025; Borders have changed

1,222 < 1,819

Births <

Russia, 2024

Early points are reconstructed within the boundaries of modern Russia; 2021–2025 have a territorial gap relative to 2010.

Energy efficiency has given scale - now accessibility is important

SQUARE BALANCE • ENERGY

USSR: separate comparable series

RSFSR / RF: do not connect with USSR

1913 → 1988: approximately ×879. Modern risk has shifted from an absolute generation deficit to networks, equipment and connection times.

The scientific scale has grown - then the personnel contour has shrunk

SQUARE BALANCE • SCIENCE

USSR: "workers of science", ths.

RF: R&D personnel, ths.

The Soviet and Russian methods are different. In the expanded coverage of 2024 - 699,9 thousand; the intensity of R&D - 0,97% GDP.

The Academy operates through eight channels.

INFLUENCE OF SCIENCE ACADEMY

MEASUREMENT

RESOURCES

ENERGY

DEFENSE

Census • Cards • Standards

Geology • Mineralogy

Physics • Materials • Accommodation

short cycle of implementation

KADRA

TERRITORIES

EXPERTISE

CULTURE

School • Postgraduate

Integrated programs

Programme and outcome evaluation

archives • languages • memory

The correct contribution metric is reducing uncertainty, creating competencies and speeding up the solution of a complex problem, rather than attributing the Academy a share of GDP.

From KEPS to expertise: the mechanism of influence has changed

INSTITUTIONAL MEANS

1915

1943–46

1991

2018

KEPS

Lab. No2

RAS

new model

resource problem

the Nuclear Project

Recovery

coordination + examination

1925

1957

2013

2026

AN USSR

SB AN USSR

253‑FZ

the RAS Report

Union Contour

Science in Siberia

Management reform

>80 Thousands of conclusions

>80 thousands.

23 thousand.

Expert Opinions

Research Topics

Negative evaluations

the Latest Report of the RAS

the Coordination Circuit

the Expert Filtration

Science strengthens the state - but does not replace institutions

Boundaries of influence

ACADEMY MAY

ACADEMY CAN'T

Measure territory and resources

set prices and taxes

Establishing scientific schools

replace customer and serial production

Reducing technological uncertainty

independently agree on a budget

Check programs and results

Closing the Property and Incentive Gap

Reduce the task-solution cycle

Accrue to yourself the entire industry

The best result occurred when the Academy was built into the contour of the problem setting and effect acceptance, while maintaining the autonomy of the method.

Proposal: Academic Register of National Balance Sheets

PROJECT OFFER

RESERVES

Population • capacity • raw materials • health

FLOWS

energy • water • issue • investment

NORMATIVES

Reliability reserves • recovery time

SCENARIA

shocks • lags • sensitivity • cascades

DECISIONS

owner • term • budget • result check

The register does not describe the current system: it is a verifiable monitoring architecture with a passport of the source, version, owner and methodology.

The next step is a measurable pilot, not another report

ROAD CARD 2026–2035

0–90 days

Approve 40–60 key balances and data passports

3–12 months

Launch three pilots: personnel, power grid, food and water

1–3 years

Introduce independent academic verification of programs

3–10 years

Link the registry to the investment cycle and impact assessment

The main lesson of 130 years: science creates the state ability only when knowledge is combined with the order, data, implementation and responsibility for the result.

Sources cited in presentation 26

  • https://rosstat.gov.ru/free_doc/new_site/rosstat/smi/perepis-120.htm
  • https://www.ras.ru/news/shownews.aspx?id=3a945fb0-48c2-4ee2-92fb-1e18ee9f858d
  • [/Sources]
  • https://rosstat.gov.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/demo/demo11.htm
  • https://www.booksite.ru/fulltext/1/001/008/113/313.htm
  • https://issek.hse.ru/news/1082485052.html
  • https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/52_10-04-2026.html
  • https://issek.hse.ru/news/1097457454.html
  • https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Prom_proiz_06_2025.xlsx
  • https://new.ras.ru/academy-new/300-let-istorii/velikie-potryaseniya/
  • https://rosstat.gov.ru/bgd/regl/b03_33/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d020/i021430r.htm
  • https://www.cbr.ru/queries/xsltblock/file/86200/-1/1201
  • https://www.prlib.ru/history/619087
  • https://minenergo.gov.ru/ministry/goelro-story
  • https://95.rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Rosstat_Tsifry_Pobedy%281%29.pdf
  • https://www.ras.ru/news/shownews.aspx?id=99594c04-ea43-40d3-854d-6cbe3d39206b&print=1
  • https://nrcki.ru/catalog/o-centre/uchastniki/kurchatovskij-institut/istoriya/
  • https://www.roscosmos.ru/dates/2/
  • https://www.sbras.ru/
  • https://istmat.org/files/uploads/17728/narhoz_sssr_1987_intensifikaciya.pdf
  • https://www.istmat.org/node/428
  • https://rosstat.gov.ru/statistics/price
  • https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/33_13-03-2026.html
  • https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/313/document/255130
  • https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201309300001
  • https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50542

Published files

Finance · Full published text

Personal and Named Funds

Source Status: Primary Document

A proposal for organising personal and named funds within a new financial architecture.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/lichnye-i-imennye-fondy

Open on the site

The concept of personal, family, personal, hereditary and public funds within the framework of the new financial system of the European Economic Area.

1. Basic idea

A personal or personal fund in the EH system is considered as a long-term contour of the accumulation, management and targeted use of value associated with a particular person, family, genus, name, scientific school, cultural heritage, social mission or project.

The Fund does not replace the bank account and does not mean an independent issue of the state currency. It is an accounting and contractual shell, which records assets, rights, obligations, income, target costs, results of intellectual activity, social and natural effect.

2. Why we need personal and personal funds

  • Preservation of the result of human labor and intellectual capital in time.
  • Separation of current consumption and development capital.
  • Formation of a transparent hereditary and charitable architecture.
  • Funding for education, science, culture, health, family and long-term projects.
  • Protection of the purpose of assets at the expense of the rules of the fund, audit and multi-level control.
  • Relationship of financial result to the mission of a person, family, family or social project.

3. Typology of funds

TypeObjectPurposeHorizon
Personal FundPersonEducation, health, development, investment, insurance reserveLife Cycle
Family FoundationFamilyHousing, children's education, family assets, mutual assistanceGeneration
Birth fundRod/DynastyHeritage, land, archive, long-term capitalMultigenerational
Name FundName/PersonalityScience, culture, awards, grants, memorial programsIndefinite
Author/Inventor FundRID/OICLicensing, author's payments, new R&DPeriod of rights + development
the People ’s Heritage FundPeople/CommunityLanguage, traditions, archives, crafts, educationIndefinite
Trust Project FundProjectConstruction, research, ecology, infrastructureBefore the result
Future Generations FundCommunityLong-term reserve and natural capital50–100+ years

4. Passport of the Fund

Each fund receives a digital passport in the EG Metareister. The passport should contain not only money, but also the meaning, origin and limitations of use.

  • Foundation ID and legal shell.
  • Founder, beneficiaries and management bodies.
  • Mission and list of acceptable goals.
  • Composition of assets: money, securities, shares, real estate, RID/OIC, digital rights, collections, archives.
  • Sources of income and distribution rules.
  • Minimum reserve and investment policy.
  • Rules of inheritance, succession and termination.
  • MSK-value code, TX-codes of operations and indicators of Live Balance.
  • Outline of compliance, audit, conflict of interest and protection.

5. The architecture of personal capital

It is proposed to divide personal capital into independent baskets so that current expenses do not destroy the capital of the future:

  • Vital reserve is basic liquidity and shock protection.
  • Capital of development - education, advanced training, research.
  • Investment capital is long-term investments.
  • Intellectual capital - rights to RID, copyright and license income.
  • Social capital - contribution to social and family projects.
  • Natural capital - participation in the restoration of ecosystems and territories.
  • Inherited capital is assets intended for future generations.

6. Name Fund as a Heritage Institute

The fund allows you to separate the identity and its legacy from the current owner of the assets. It may support a science school, museum, library, prize, scholarship program, archive, laboratory, cultural center, or community mission. The main principle is that the name becomes not a marketing sign, but a responsibility for the continuation of the result.

7. Relationship with the New Financial System

In a model where a person is seen as the primary source of value created, a fund becomes a mechanism for capitalizing a person’s outcome. It is not a person who prints money, but the confirmed result of his activity receives accounting, evaluation, rights and the possibility of financing.

  • Labor → confirmed income and professional reputation.
  • Knowledge → qualification, educational capital, RID.
  • Invention → OIC, license, royalties, fund of the next innovation cycle.
  • Social activity → measurable social effect.
  • Ecological activity → natural effect in Living Balance.
  • Heritage → archive, rights, collections, educational programs.

8. Live Balance Fund

The living balance of the fund should show not only the balance of funds, but also the quality of capital. For each period are recorded:

ContourWhat countsExample of indicator
FinancialAssets, liabilities, liquidity, profitabilityNAV, cash reserve
IntelligentRID, OIC, licenses, knowledgeIncome from rights, number of active licenses
HumanEducation, health, competenceDevelopment index
SocialFamily, community, community projectsSocial impact
NaturalRecovery and ecological footprintECO-index
CulturallyHeritage, archive, language, worksHeritage Preservation Index

9. Management and protection

  • The principle of two or more signatures for large operations.
  • Separation of the founder, manager and controller where necessary.
  • Prohibition of hidden conflicts of interest.
  • Public or limited report on the intended use - on the regime of the fund.
  • Reservation of key documents and rights.
  • Antifraud and preliminary control of operations.
  • Hereditary protocol and predetermined continuity.

10. Peoples' Funds and Assembly of the Peoples of the World

A separate class is the personal and people's funds of the Assembly. They can accumulate funds and rights to preserve languages, cultural codes, historical archives, traditional knowledge, crafts and natural areas. For each nation, its own heritage passport and a list of programs are formed, but the general methodology of the fund is unified.

11. Encoding in Metareister

Proposed fund identifier format: FUND:EG-[TYPE]-[OWNER]-[YEAR]-[ID]. Each operation additionally receives a TX code and a semantic MSK code.

Example: FUND:EG-NAMED-VERNADSKY-2026-001

Example of operation: TX:EG-FUND001-EDU-S01-D05-20260829-00017

12. Pilot program

  • Pilot 1 - Personal Foundation for Human Development.
  • Pilot 2 - Three Generation Family Foundation.
  • Pilot 3 - Name Scientific Foundation.
  • Pilot 4 - RID/OIC Foundation and continuous R&D funding.
  • Pilot 5 - One Nation Heritage Foundation within the Assembly.
  • Pilot 6 - Foundation for the restoration of a specific ecosystem.

13. Legal regime

The specific legal form of the fund should be determined by the legislation of the relevant jurisdiction. The EG concept does not abolish banking, tax, inheritance, charity, investment and anti-money laundering regulations. The pilot needs a separate legal qualification for each model.

14. Result

Personal and personal funds turn personal, intellectual, family and cultural results into long-term capital. In EH architecture, it is a bridge between man as a source of created value, the Living Balance, the Metareister, the heritage of ancestors and the financial system of future generations.

Published files

Finance · Full published text

A New Global Financial System

Source Status: Primary Document

A master document and presentation of a proposed architecture for global settlements, funds and balances.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/novaya-mirovaya-finansovaya-sistema

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM • LEDGER • ECO‑PPA • 741

Concept: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

2026

02 / SUMMARY

A system in which money serves development

It is not a single world currency that is offered, but a compatible multi-level financial infrastructure.

Five project solutions

1A personal fund fixes the rights, goals and confirmed results of development without turning a person into an uncontrolled issuer of legal tender.
2Central banks, commercial banks, and regulated institutions remain sources of trust; new instruments are embedded in existing law.
3The Ledger — a layer of evidence. Each operation links its basis, decision, resources, implementation, impact and audit.
4New rights of claim and project limits are allowed only within the limits of the confirmed effect, cash flows and risk buffers.
5First, legal and technical sandbox, then interregional and cross-border corridors, then standardization.

Status: author's strategic concept. It is not a decision of an international organization, monetary policy, legal opinion or investment recommendation.

03 / DIAGNOSIS

Why the current system needs an add-on

GapManifestationWhat architecture should change
Cross-border paymentsCost, delays, non-transparency of the route, break of compliance modes.General data, atomic calculation, transparent SLA and end-to-end status of the operation.
Financial accessibilityAccess to the account does not guarantee stability, data protection and access to long capital.Name funds, rights transferability, secure digital identity.
Project financingEffect and cash flow are often not combined in a single evidence loop.Link problem, solution, contract, effect, flow and return of capital.
Trust in Digital AssetsFragmentary security, legal uncertainty, run risk and cyber threats.Regulatory perimeter, quality settlement assets, audit and reserves.
Environmental and social effectsMetrics are separate from financial result; risk of greenwashing is high.Evidence registers, independent verification, payments for the result.

Project conclusion: reform cannot be reduced to registry technology. What is needed is both right, central bank money, regulated deposits, a single data model, risk management and a clear public purpose.

04 / DOCTRINE

Twelve Principles of Design

Contour AOutline B
1. Dignity
Finance does not turn a person into an object of total observation.
2. Sovereignty
National currencies, central bank mandates and capital regimes remain.
3. Double-level money
The central bank and regulated intermediaries remain the core of trust.
4. Interoperability
Single messages and rules are more important than a single technology platform.
5. Evidence
Right, resource, action and result are linked by a verifiable chain.
6. Finality
The moment of final calculation is determined legally and technically.
7. Proportionality
Compliance and data correspond to risk rather than maximum data collection.
8. Security
The new limits are based on assets, cash flows and effects.
9. Returnability
Debt, share, grant and payment for the result vary before funding.
10. Pluralism
Public, private, cooperative and public institutions coexist.
11. Sustainability
Liquidity, cyber defense, recovery, and dispute resolution are built-in.
12. Reversibility
The pilot can be stopped and rolled up without systemic damage.

05 / ARCHITECTURE

The seven interconnected layers

L7Governance and public mandaterules, representation, audit, disputes, updating standards
L6Risks, Compliance and PrivacyAML/CFT, KYC/KYB, Sanctions regimes, cyber-resilience, data minimization
L5Evidence Ledgerbases, versions, signatures, events, metrics, results, responsibility
L4Funds and programmable contractsname, design, territorial, natural funds; ECO-PPA
L3Assets and rights of claimdeposits, bonds, shares, commodities, infrastructure and performance rights
L2Calculation and interoperabilityISO 20022, FX/PvP, atomic settlement, national system gateways
L1Monetary CoreCentral bank reserves, cash/digital money, regulated deposits

Dependency rule: innovation on the top layer cannot weaken the legal certainty and quality of the settlement asset on the bottom layers.

06 / TOOLS

Money stack: what is saved and what is added

ToolRoleIssuer / operatorLimitation
The Sovereign CurrencyUnit of account, means of payment, tax and legal anchor.Central Bank/State.Not replaced by a global token.
Regulated depositThe main form of private money and credit.Licensed bank.Capital, liquidity, insurance/permit.
Tokenized deposit/reserveProgrammable presentation of an existing requirement.Bank/Central Bank.It does not change the legal nature of the basic requirement.
MURDE — design calculation unitComparison of budgets, effects and calculations of the pilot.Multilateral operator of the contract.Not currency or legal tender without a separate mandate.
Name FundRights to targeted development: education, health, housing, entrepreneurship.Fund/bank/public institution.Targeted use, guardianship, inheritance, audit.
Unit of confirmed resultPayment for measurable infrastructural, environmental or social impact.Project SPV/customer.Repayment only by verification protocol.

07 / MAN

Name fund: financial contour of personal development

Name Fund is not a “wallet of free money”, but a portable contractual outline of goals, rights, sources and results. It can combine public appropriations, private contributions, insurance coverage, educational capital, project income, and charitable funds.

Composition of the passportWhat is fixed
Subject and authorityidentity; capacity; representative/guardian; consent; heritability
Objectiveseducation; health; housing; mobility; entrepreneurship; community contribution
Sourcesbudget; employer; family; insurance; grant; income; cooperative; project effect
Rightsaccess, portability, supplier selection, appeal, deletion of optional data
Limitationsappointment, term, limit, permissible counterparties, conflict of interest
Evidencecontract, bill, service result, digital signature, independent verification
Resultnot only consumption, but also measurable change in human capabilities

08 / EMISSION

The rule of permissible expansion: value before limit

Eₜ ≤ min(ΔVᵛᵉʳₜ, CFᵉˡᵢᵍₜ, Pᵃᵖᵖʳₜ) − Rₜ − Lₜ

MarkingMeaningEvidence
EₜAcceptable new commitment/financing limit in period tthe decision of the authorized issuer or fund
ΔVᵛᵉʳVerified increase in value or prevented damagemethodology, baseline, independent verification
CFᵉˡᵢᵍacceptable cash flowcontract, payment discipline, stress scenario
PᵃᵖᵖʳApproved project budgetBudget, corporate or multilateral solution
RₜBuffer of credit, market and model riskreserves, haircuts, concentration limits
Lₜliquidity buffer and operational recoveryliquid assets, recovery plan, emergency mode

09 / MATHEMATICS

741: engineering implementation matrix

ScaleThe main questionSolution type
Person / organizationWhat has changed for a particular subject?name fund, contract, law, competence, income, security
State / TerritoryHow are sovereignty, sustainability and reproduction maintained?budget, monetary policy, infrastructure, industry, social guarantees
Planet / interstate contourHow to reconcile common risks and cross-border flows?standards, corridors, climate/water/biosphere, settlement, dispute resolution

Nineteen subject contours

01–0506–1011–1516–19
persons, family/community, education, health, housinglabor, entrepreneurship, industry, energy, waterfood, transport, digital environment, finance, lawsafety, culture, territory, biosphere

741 is neither a mystical number nor an automatic algorithm of truth. This is a completeness map: it shows where the data is missing, the decision owner, the risk buffer, or proof of outcome.

10 / CYCLES

260 and 13 phases: from meaning to adjustment

The “Ledger” uses 260 as a map of a complete cycle of meaning: 20 archetypes × 13 tones. Within the financial architecture, this is not a calendar prediction but a discipline of classification: who acts, in which phase, on what basis and with what proven effect.

Phase APhase BPhase C
L01
Signal
L02
Sources
L03
Verification
L04
Base Line
L05
Diagnosis
L06
Scripts
L07
Corridor
L08
Options
L09
Right
L10
Resource
L11
Implementation
L12
Confirmation
L13
Adjustment

11 / LEDGER

Evidence-based register of value movement

A ledger is not just an accounting record and not necessarily a single blockchain. It is a federated data model in which legal documents can be stored by owners, and the common layer contains verifiable links, statuses, signatures, and version hashes.

Event fieldContentsMonitoring
ID and timepersistent identifier, jurisdiction, timestampintegrity, synchronization, uniqueness
Basislaw, mandate, contract, budget, consentpower, version, expiration date
Subjectspayer, recipient, beneficiary, validatorKYC/KYB, roles, conflict of interest
Resourcecurrency, asset, limit, service, dataownership/claims, encumbrances
Actionreservation, transfer, delivery, verification, repaymentauthorization, finality, reversible
ResultBefore/after metric, preventable damage, availabilitytechnique, oracle, independent confirmation
Risk and liabilitylimit, reserve, insurance, owner of riskstress test, recovery, dispute, sanctions

12 / MANAGEMENT

The Institutional Scheme: Federation, Not the Global Monopolist

LevelProposed functionKey Fuse
Multilateral Councildoctrine, standards tolerance, KPI, public reportBalance of voices of states, institutions and public representatives
Technical authoritydata schemas, identifiers, compatibility testsopen specifications, version, independent implementations
Payment operatorrouting, PvP/atomic settlement, finality statusseparated from emission and project selection; PFMI
The National GatewayApplication of local law, currency regime and supervisionCentral bank autonomy; right to stop
Funds and SPVstructuring of name, project and territorial programsfiduciary duty, asset segregation, audit
Validatorsverification of data, results and assuranceaccreditation, rotation, responsibility, conflict of interest
Arbitration / Ombudsmandisputes, user rights, error correctionAffordable procedure and execution of decisions

13 / LAW

Legal compatibility before scaling

1Monetary and banking law who is entitled to issue an instrument; whether it is money, a deposit, a security or another requirement
2Payments and finality of the moment of finality; clearing; return; participant’s insolvency; security mode
3Currency control and sanctions allowed currencies, cross-border restrictions, screening and lawful blocking
4AML/CFT and identity risk-oriented verification, travel rule, digital ID, record storage
5Data and privacy purpose processing, localization, cross-border transmission, minimization, automated solutions
6Securities and investments public offering, investor qualification, disclosure, market infrastructure
7Taxes and accounting valuation, income recognition, VAT/profit, reservation, audit, consolidation
8Consumer protection understandable terms, commission, complaint, refund, non-discrimination, digital accessibility

FATF highlights a risk-based approach to digital identity and virtual assets; PFMI — requirements for management, risk, finality and operational sustainability5][6][7]

14 / RISKS

Red team: how the system can fail

RiskEarly indicatorMandatory control
Inflationary expansionLimits are growing faster than proven value/flowindependent rule of limits; reserves; the right to stop
Run and lack of liquidityacceleration of repayments, spreads and concentrationliquid buffer; waterfall; recovery/resolution
Political/corporate takeoveropaque selection and related financingpublic criteria; conflict of interest; audit
Total financial surveillanceData Objectives and Hidden Scoresprivacy by design; minimization; prohibition of secondary use
Cyber Attack / Stopgrowth of critical vulnerabilities, lack of backup modesegmentation; zero trust; backup calculation; exercises
Greenwashing / false effectThe metric changes after fundingpreliminary protocol; baseline; independent validator
Oracle and Model RiskDifference of sources, model driftmultiple sources; manual override; version log
Legal fragmentationone operation receives different qualificationsnational gateways; rulebook corridor; arbitration
Digital ExceptionThe service is available only through expensive devicesoffline/assisted channels; universal design

15 / PILOT

Four pilots with limited risk

P1Name Development Fund Education + health + entrepreneurship in one jurisdiction. Criteria: portability, target use, privacy, measurable result
P2ECO-PPA "water-energy-food" Long-term contract, where savings and new value form the return. Criteria: baseline, guaranteed result, cash flow, independent verification
P3Interregional project corridor. Settlement between banks and SPV through a shared Ledger. Criteria: ISO 20022, finality, SLA, compliance, reduced manual reconciliation
P4Cross-border wholesale sandbox Two to three currencies, regulated banks, tokenized deposits and reserves. Criteria: PvP/atomic settlement, central bank autonomy, privacy, recovery

The Agor BIS project has already demonstrated the ability to combine tokenized deposits and reserves on a common platform while maintaining national autonomy and privacy. This confirms the technical direction, but does not replace national legal decisions. [1][3]

16 / ROAD CARD

36 months: from doctrine to working corridor

PeriodOutcome of the phaseConditions of transition
0–3 monthsDoctrine, dictionary, map of law, target architecture, program management authority.approved mandate; list of jurisdictions and instruments
3–6 monthsPilot's Rulebook, Threat Model, Data, KPI, Financial Model, Name Fund Design.Signed members; legal opinions; risk appetite
6–12 monthsTechnical and legal sandbox; digital double calculations; test failure scenarios.proven finality; privacy assessment; recovery test
12–18 monthsP1 and P2 in one jurisdiction; limited number of users and projects.KPI results; no critical violations; audit
18–24 monthsP3 interregional; standardized messages and mutual verification.reduced manual operations; agreed controversial mode
24–36 monthsP4 cross-border wholesale corridor; independent assessment and scaling package.decisions of central banks and regulators; stable indicators

17 / MEASUREMENT

Results bar: not speed for speed

Outline KPIIndicatorsPurposeful meaning
Paymentcost; end-to-end time; straight-through share; time to finality; controversial operationscheaper, faster, more transparent, more affordable
Trustidentity errors; false positives; investigation time; confirmed fraudcompliance without excessive exclusion
ResilienceLiquid rupture; loss; RTO/RPO; cyber incidents; concentrationsystem survives stress without cascade
Personaccess to the service; portability; complaints; data disclosure; changing capabilitiesImproving lives, not increasing transactions
Projectcompliance with budget/term; cash flow; default; independent effectCapital is related to the real result
TerritoryAvailability of infrastructure; local cooperation; tax/economic baseReproduction and reduction of imbalances
Planetwater, energy, emissions, biodiversity, preventable damageVerifiable effect without double counting
Managementopen decisions; conflict of interest; time of dispute; audit performanceAccountability and Adjustment

18 / START PACKAGE

What needs to be approved by the first decision

№DocumentContents
01Doctrinevalues, limits of permissible, sovereignty, status MURDE and registered funds
02Pilot mandatejurisdiction, participants, tools, limits, deadline, stop criteria
03Rulebookevents, roles, finality, disputes, sanctions, version updates
04Data ArchitectureISO 20022-profile, identifiers, proofs, privacy, storage
05Financial modelsources, reserves, collateral, waterfall, stress testing, loss coverage
06Method of effectbaseline, additiveity, double count, verifier, results disclosure
07Risk managementrisk appetite, risk owners, recovery/resolution, cyber learning
08Independent evaluationlegal, technical, financial, ethical and public expertise

Concept: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich • EQUILIBRIUM • Editorial Board 1.0 • 2026

19 / SOURCES

Normative and analytical support

[1] BIS, Annual Economic Report 2026, Chapter III: “Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins”.
https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2026e3.htm

[2] Financial Stability Board, G20 Roadmap for Cross-border Payments: Consolidated Progress Report for 2025.
https://www.fsb.org/2025/10/g20-roadmap-for-cross-border-payments-consolidated-progress-report-for-2025/

[3] BIS Innovation Hub, Project Agorá: a shared programmable platform for wholesale cross-border payments, 27 May 2026.
https://www.bis.org/publ/othp110.htm

[4] World Bank, Global Findex Database 2025.
https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/globalfindex

[5] ISO 20022, official standard overview and repository.
https://www.iso20022.org/iso-20022

[6] FATF, The FATF Recommendations, last updated June 2026.
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Fatf-recommendations.html

[7] CPMI–IOSCO, Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI).
https://www.bis.org/cpmi/info_pfmi.htm

[8] World Bank, Remittance Prices Worldwide, global average 6.36% (highlight, 2025).
https://remittanceprices.worldbank.org/

[9] IMF, “What is the SDR?”.
https://www.imf.org/en/about/factsheets/sheets/2023/special-drawing-rights-sdr

[10] IMF, Central Bank Digital Currency Virtual Handbook.
https://www.imf.org/en/topics/digital-payments-and-finance/central-bank-digital-currency/virtual-handbook

[11] United Nations, SDG 10.c: remittance costs below 3% and no corridor above 5% by 2030.
https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal10

[12] BIS CPMI, “Tokenisation in the context of money and other assets”, 2024.
https://www.bis.org/cpmi/publ/d225.pdf

Accessed: 29 August 2026. Official primary sources have been used. The project elements EQUILIBRIUM, Ledger, MURDE, ECO‑PPA, 260 and 741 constitute the author’s concept and are not attributed to the organisations named.

Other published edition: NEW WORLD FINANCIAL SYSTEM Novaya_mirovaya_finansovaya_sistema.pptx · Web Text +

Human-centered architecture of trust, calculation and development

EQUILIBRIUM

LEDGER

741

Concept: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

2026

Finance is a development infrastructure, not an end in itself

TEZIS

Not one currency for everyone, but a common protocol of trust over sovereign systems.

The Sovereign Core

Compatible calculation

Central banks, national currencies and regulated deposits retain legal anchor.

ISO 20022, national gateways, PvP/atomic settlement and transparent finality.

HUMANITY

Development funds

Proven result

Name, design, territorial and natural contours link goals and resources.

The ledger records the basis, action, effect, audit, and adjustment.

Right • Goals • Dignity

Why a new superstructure is needed now

DIAGNOSIS

Why a new superstructure is needed now

GLOBAL SIGNALS

Digital infrastructure is evolving faster than agreed rules, measurable user effect, and cross-jurisdictional interoperability.

Three signals: high user cost, global result lag and proven technical feasibility of compatible calculations.

6,36%

2027

7 + 40+

average cost of sending money transfers

Most of the goals G20 are achieved at risk

Central Banks and Regulated Institutions in Project Agor

Seven layers: innovation does not weaken the monetary core

ARCHITECTURE

Governance and public mandate

Rules • Audit • Disputes

Risks, Compliance and Privacy

AML/CFT • cyber • privacy

Evidence Ledger

Base • signatures • effect

Funds and programmable contracts

Nameplate • Project • ECO‑PPA

Assets and rights of claim

Deposits • Bonds • results

Calculation and interoperability

ISO 20022 • PvP • Locks

Monetary Core

Central Bank reserves • sovereign money • deposits

Dependency rule: the top layer can add a function, but not cancel the quality of the settlement asset and the legal finality of the lower layers.

Money stack: save the core, add functions

1 Sovereign currency

Unit of account, tax and legal anchor. Not replaced by a global token.

2 Adjustable deposit

The main form of private money and credit; capital, liquidity, and supervision persist.

3 MURDE

Pilot unit of account for budgets and effects. Not a legal tender.

4 Result unit

The right to payment only after checking the infrastructure, environmental or social effects.

Name Fund — a portable contour of personal development

HUMANITY

Not a “wallet of free money”, but a contract of goals, rights, sources, limitations and proven results.

EDUCATION

HOUSING

Competence • selection • result

right • accumulation • infrastructure

NAMED

FUND

HEALTH

ENTERPRISE

insurance • prevention • access

capital • risk • cooperation

Minimization of data

portability of rights

Value before limit

EMISSION

Eₜ ≤ min(ΔVᵛᵉʳₜ, CFᵉˡᵢᵍₜ, Pᵃᵖᵖʳₜ) − Rₜ − Lₜ

ΔVᵛᵉʳ Proven Value

CFᵉˡᵢᵍ acceptable flow

Rₜ risk-buffer

Lₜ Liquidity

baseline + independent verification

contract + stress scenario

reserves + haircuts + concentration

liquid assets + recovery plan

The design principle, not the current norm: each tool requires a separate legal basis, accounting, taxation and supervision.

3 × 13 × 19 = 741

MATHEMATICS

741 — engineering completeness map

Scale × Life Cycle Phases × Subject Contours

MASSTABA

FAZ

CONTOURS

person

State

Planet

Signal → Right

Resource → Action

result → correction

• infrastructure

Finance • Security

Culture • Biosphere

741 is neither a mystical number nor an algorithm of truth. This is a control card: where there is no data, the owner of the decision, a risk buffer or proof of the result.

13 phases: from signal to adjustment

CYCLES

The Ledger connects meaning, rights, resources, action and a proven result within one life cycle.

L01

L02

L03

L04

L05

L06

L07

Signal

Sources

Verification

Base Line

Diagnosis

Scripts

Corridor

L08

L09

L10

L11

L12

L13

Options

Right

Resource

Implementation

Confirmation

Adjustment

260 = 20 Archetypes × 13 tones - map of the full semantic cycle

Federal platform: general compatibility, national autonomy

CALCULATION

National Gateway A

Regulated banks

Local Law

Currency A

Central Bank A

tokenized deposits

KYC/KYB

Liquidity

GENERAL

PROGRAMMABLE

PLATFORM

National Gateway B

Ledger

PvP / atomic settlement

Local Law

Currency B

Central Bank B

reason

Finality Status

Proof

ISO 20022 is a common message language, not a "list of compatible cryptocurrencies".

The Federation of Institutions is not a global monopoly

GOVERNANCE

Technical authority

National locks

Data schema • tests • versions

Right • Currency • Supervision

MULTILATERAL

Council

Payment operator

Funds and validators

route • finality • recovery

Mandate • Effect • Audit

The working name "World Financial Council" means a forum for coordination and standardization - not a supranational issuer with unlimited power.

Four red lines of admission

PROTECTORS

MONETARY SUSTAINABILITY

LAW AND FINALITY

Limits • Reserves • Liquidity • resolution

instrument qualification • calculation • dispute

PRIVACY AND COMPLAENCE

EFFECT AND AUDIT

Minimization of data • risk-based AML/CFT

baseline • additionality • independent validator

Stop: Uncontrolled emission • unclear finality • critical data leakage • unaddressed risk of loss • falsification of result

Four limited experiments instead of the "big bang"

PILOTS

Name Fund

ECO‑PPA

Interregional corridor

Cross-border sandbox

Education + Health + Entrepreneurship

water + energy + food; return from effect

banks + SPV + a unified Ledger

2–3 Currency + regulated banks + PvP

General criterion: measurable user and project results without weakening rights, privacy and monetary sustainability.

36 months: from doctrine to working corridor

0–6 months

Doctrine, Dictionary, Law Map, Pilot Rulebook, Data, KPI, Financial Model and Risk Appetite.

6–18 months

Legal and technical sandbox; P1 and P2 in one jurisdiction; finality, privacy and recovery test.

18–36 months

Interregional P3, then cross-border P4; independent assessment and standardization package.

MANDATE

PILOT

CORRIDOR

Authorize the pilot's mandate

FIRST DECISION

Meaning

↓

Right

↓

Data

↓

Money

↓

Action

↓

Result

↓

Adjustment

Not “to issue a new world currency”, but to test a compatible architecture of trust in a limited outline.

Borders and legal status

participants, limits and stop conditions

data, finality and privacy

Financial model and risk coverage

Method of effect and independent audit

Concept: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich • EQUILIBRIUM • Editorial Board 1.0 • 2026

Sources cited in presentation 10

  • https://remittanceprices.worldbank.org/
  • https://www.fsb.org/2025/10/g20-roadmap-for-cross-border-payments-consolidated-progress-report-for-2025/
  • https://www.bis.org/publ/othp110.htm
  • [/Sources]
  • https://www.imf.org/en/about/factsheets/sheets/2023/special-drawing-rights-sdr
  • https://www.imf.org/en/topics/digital-payments-and-finance/central-bank-digital-currency/virtual-handbook
  • https://www.iso20022.org/iso-20022
  • https://www.iso20022.org/faq
  • https://www.bis.org/cpmi/info_pfmi.htm
  • https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Fatf-recommendations.html

Published files

Finance · Full published text

A System of Personal and Named Funds and Banks

Source Status: Primary Document

Architecture for interaction between funds, banks and personal accounting domains.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/sistema-lichnykh-i-imennykh-fondov

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM · FUND SYSTEM · ECO-PPA · SPECZASHCHITA · SFERA · ARCHIVE OF HERITAGE

Author: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · 29 August 2026

Status: author's project hypothesis for legal, banking and expert verification

02 / MANUAL SOLUTION

Allow 90-day design pilot

Check the legal shell, roles, banking gateways, registers and evidence cycle - without public fundraising and without starting banking activities.

Main thesis
It is not money that creates a fund. The fund creates rules that link purpose, law, capital, decision and proof.

ParameterProposal
SubjectThe system of management of separate capital and name programs on top of existing accounts, contracts and licensed providers.
Timeframe90 calendar days; design, prototype and dry runs.
ModeRead-only and shadow mode: the platform does not accept money, does not open accounts and does not initiate automatic transfers.
CasesOne reference personal fund, one name program and two model projects ECO-PPA.
WithdrawalLegal card, fund passport, six registers, banking RFI, evidence package and GO/CONDITIONAL GO/NO-GO solution.

Recommended solution
Approve the design perimeter; allow real cash flows only by a separate solution after legal, tax, AML/KYC and bank statements.

03 / PROBLEM AND THESIS

Accounts show money, but do not explain its mandate

A family, benefactor, institution, or project may have assets and contracts, but without a common model, it is difficult to prove purpose, authority, limitations, outcome, and continuity.

  • Break 1. The purpose of the owner is not always fixed as an enforceable mandate with prohibitions and a deadline.
  • Break 2. Accounts, securities, rights, obligations and projects are conducted in different systems.
  • Break 3. A “name fund” can be a name without a clear legal shell.
  • Break 4. A user's "personal bank" is easily mistaken for a credit institution.
  • Break 5. The executor, the manager of capital and the verifier of the result may coincide.
  • Break 6. After the change of generations, the foundations of decisions, rights, versions and knowledge are lost.

System response
The federal layer of mandates and separate capital: each fund retains its own shell and accounts, and the overall architecture links rights, decisions, projects, evidence and the Heritage Archive.

04 / TERMS MAP

Five concepts should not be confused

ConceptContentsA hard border
Personal financial contourObjectives, accounts, assets, liabilities, insurance and investment products of an individual or family.Not a legal entity or a bank.
Personal FundA separate legal shell for the transferred property, goals and rights of beneficiaries.The design is confirmed for a specific jurisdiction.
Name FundA foundation or program associated with the name of a person, family, territory, institution, or idea.The name does not replace the legal shell.
Bank / custodian / managerLicensed entities for accounts, settlements, storage and asset management.They only operate within the permitted limits.
"Personal Bank"Cabinet of capital: review, budgets, limits, forecasts and instructions to providers.It does not accept deposits, lend or store client assets on its own behalf.

Public name
“Personal bank” is only a project metaphor. Public name and advertising require separate legal verification; "Personal Treasury" or "Capital Cabinet" is preferred.

05 / PRINCIPLES AND INVARIANTS

The system starts with prohibitions, not functions.

1. Separateness: Assets, liabilities, and decisions of different funds do not mix.

2. Legal rights arise from the law, constituent documents and treaties, and not from the interface.

3. Licensed contour. accounts, payments, storage and investment services are performed by authorized organizations.

4. A person makes a decision. EQUILIBRIUM calculates scenarios, but does not receive the right to transfer funds.

5. Role-sharing: The initiator, approver, payer, executor, and validator do not form one uncontrollable center.

6. Proof before the tranche. the conditions of the result and acceptance documents are approved in advance.

7. Traceability. each significant decision has an author, authority, date, version, and basis.

8. Continuity The Heritage Archive preserves the context, rights, evidence and lessons for the next cycle.

Invariant
The internal register is a management reflection. A legal document defines the right; a bank or custodian statement confirms the asset; an independent document confirms the result.

06 / PLACE IN THE GENERAL ECOSYSTEM

The system of funds connects the forecast with the legal decision on capital

ContourFunctionBorder
EQUILIBRIUMSignals, scenarios, risk indicators, limits and forecast.It does not manage assets.
Funds systemMandates, rights, constraints, sources of capital and solutions.They don’t accept client money on their balance.
ECO-PPATask, technology, cooperation, capital, contract, data and result.Project and resource framework; not the executor.
SPECZASHCHITACooperative assembly, execution, sustainability and logistics.It does not confirm its own result alone.
SFERAInitiatives, participants, knowledge, feedback and scaling.It does not store assets and is not a regulator.
Heritage archiveOrigin, Versions, Decisions, Evidence, and Continuity.It does not store passwords, bank keys and excessive personal data.

Formula
SIGNAL → MANDATE → CAPITAL → ECO-PPA → EXECUTION → VERIFICATION → ARCHIVE → NEW CYCLE

07 / SIX ARCHITECTURE WORDS

Each fund is a node of six mandatory layers

1. Will, purpose and rights. Founder or donor, mission, beneficiaries, permissible and prohibited use.

2. Legal shell and management. organization or program, charter, term, bodies, powers, conflicts, substitution and termination.

3. Assets and liabilities. source of property, legal owner, accounts, instruments, restrictions, reserves and liquidity.

4. Licensed infrastructure. bank, custodian, depository, broker, manager and payment provider - each within the authority.

5. Project outline. ECO-PPA, contracts, budgets, stages, tranches, executors and independent verification.

6. Evidence and heritage. decisions, statements, acts, measurements, reports, versions and archival packages.

End-to-end functions
Compliance, taxes, data protection, cybersecurity, auditing and analytics EQUILIBRIUM go through all six layers.

Formula
PURPOSE + FOOTBALL + BENEFICIARIES + ASSETS + DECISION RULES + LICENSE INFRASTRUCTURE + PROOF + ARCHIVE

08 / FUND ARCHETIES

The type of fund is defined by a task, not a beautiful name

ArchetypePurposeKey Control
Personal / FamilyPreservation, use and continuity of capital.Rights of beneficiaries and replacement of bodies.
NameSupport a mission related to a name, territory, or idea.The name does not replace the legal status.
EndowmentLong-term funding of the mission through targeted capital.Conservation of basic capital and spending policies.
Charitable / grantFinancing of recipients and socially useful programs.Selection criteria and targeted use.
Project / SoftwareSeparated capital under the result ECO-PPA.Contract, stages, tranches and acceptance.
StandbyLiquidity and continuity of obligations.Terms of use and restoration of the reserve.
Development / co-investmentTechnology, entrepreneurship and cooperation.Risk, evaluation and lack of promised returns.
"Heritage Archive"Preservation, digitization, research and access.Origin, access rights and long-term preservation.

This is a functional typology. The legal form is selected separately for each jurisdiction, purpose, asset and membership.

09 / PERSONAL FINANCIAL CONTOUR

Prior to the establishment of the Fund, an honest personal balance is required

The Fund does not correct unclear property, undivided obligations or the absence of family rules.

Goals. living expenses, education, health, housing, entrepreneurship, charity and heritage.

Assets. accounts, deposits, securities, business shares, real estate, claims and intellectual property rights.

Obligations. loans, guarantees, taxes, maintenance of property, contractual and family obligations.

Reserves. operational, emergency, tax, project and hereditary.

Rights. owners, joint ownership, powers of attorney, will, marriage and corporate documents.

Providers. banks, brokers, insurers, managers, notaries, auditors and tax consultants.

Transition to Fund Criteria
The legal shell is justified if it solves the problem of management, mission protection, continuity or separation, which cannot be reliably solved only by contracts and personal accounts.

Border
A personal financial contour is a management model of a person or family. It is not a bank, fund or guarantee system.

10 / PERSONAL FUND AS A LEGAL HEAVEN

In Russia, a personal fund is not an account, but a separate non-profit organization

Verified legal guidance
The FTS describes the personal fund as a special form of NPO for the management of the founder's property in the interests of these persons; the constituent document is the charter. Specific conditions of establishment, composition of property, management, rights of beneficiaries and taxes are checked at the date of the transaction.

The starting threshold. on the date of preparation of the Civil Code provides for the transfer of property by the founder with a market value of at least 100 million rubles when creating a personal fund, except for the hereditary fund; the assessment and relevance of the norm are confirmed before the institution.

Transferred property must have an established owner, value, origin and legal regime; after the transfer, the mode of the selected shell is in effect.

Subsequent receipts. current law should not be described by the previous general prohibition on free transfers from third parties; the grounds, restrictions and tax consequences of each receipt are checked separately.

Management. charter and management conditions should describe the bodies, competence, prohibitions, substitution and procedure for changing documents.

Beneficiaries. fixed not only individuals or classes, but also the nature of the rights, conditions, terms, information and appeal.

Bank and assets. accounts are maintained by the bank; securities are taken into account by the authorized participant; investment service is provided within the license.

Continuity. scenarios of death, incapacity, conflict, lack of organ and termination of the fund are modeled in advance.

What not to promise
Automatic protection from creditors, tax neutrality, guaranteed safety of property, complete confidentiality or universal applicability of one design.

Main sources: Federal Law No 287-FZ; GK RF; FNS materials. This section is not a legal opinion.

11 / NAMED FUND

Name creates mission; documents create rights

A separate organization. the name is included in the name of a legally established fund or other admissible NGO.

The program within the NPO. a nominal scholarship, grant line, museum, scientific, cultural or social program is conducted in a separate analytics.

The target capital. name and mission can be associated with a separate target capital of NGOs, subject to the relevant law.

Personal fund. name mission can be fixed in the purposes and rules of the personal fund, if the chosen design allows it.

Contractual program. for the pilot, a separate budget and rules are possible in the existing organization without a statement on the creation of a new legal entity.

Mandatory name verification
Consent and rights to the name, reputational restrictions, trademarks, personal data, rules of use after death and the procedure for withdrawal should be fixed separately.

Formula
NAME + MISSION + LEGAL ENVIRONMENT + RULES OF USE + RECOGNITION + CONTINUITY

12 / ENDAUMENT, CHARITY AND PROJECTS

One mission may require different legal and financial contours

ContourWhen appropriateCannot be substituted
Target capital of NGOsLong-term funding for a specific non-profit mission.Ordinary operating account or investment product without requirements 275-FZ.
Charitable programFree assistance and socially useful activities.Commercial investment, public contribution or hidden reward to the donor.
Project Fund ECO-PPACapital under measurable result, contract, stages and verification.Bank, independent type of contract or guarantee of result.
ReserveCovering a certain risk and continuity of obligations.Free "wallet" without limits and rules of recovery.
Development FundFinancing of technologies, business or cooperation through an acceptable shell.Promised profitability and unlicensed management of other people’s assets.

Project rule
If the economic function has become investment, banking, brokerage, payment or trust management, the name "fund" does not exempt from the appropriate regime and admission.

References: Federal Laws No. 7-FZ, No. 135-FZ and No. 275-FZ; each model is classified separately.

13 / PASSPORT FUND

Fifteen fields turn an idea into a manageable node

BlockMandatory content
IdentityID, title, status, jurisdiction, version and date.
Missionpurpose, time, permissible and prohibited use.
Rightshell, constituent documents, owner of assets and restrictions.
Participantsfounders, donors, beneficiaries, bodies that control persons.
Managementcompetence, quorum, veto, substitution, conflicts and related transactions.
Infrastructurebank, custodian, manager, contracts, licenses and replacement plan.
Policiesdistribution, liquidity, risk, investments, expenses and reserves.
Projectsadmission criteria ECO-PPA, budget, tranches, result and verification.
Monitoringreporting, auditing, complaints, incidents, reorganization and termination.
Data and archiveaccess, minimization, storage periods, versions and archive package.

Passport Status
The passport does not replace the charter, contract, statement or bank document. It links official sources and records which version was the basis of the decision.

14 / BANK, CASTODIAN AND CONTROL

The Fund sets the mandate; licensed providers perform regulated functions

FunctionThe Source of TruthSystem control
Bank account and paymentAccount agreement, order and bank statement.Authority, limit, assignment, reconciliation and reconciliation.
Deposit / DepositAgreement and terms of the bank.Term, liquidity, concentration and applicability of insurance protection.
Brokerage operationBrokerage contract, order and report.Investment policy, risk, commission and conflict of interest.
Accounting for securitiesDepository or registry record.Reconciliation of owner, quantity, encumbrances and storage chain.
Asset managementContract with the authorized manager and report.Mandate, limits, risk, cost and independent oversight.
Project paymentContract, account, act and payment document.Gateway ECO-PPA, stage, proof and no double payment.

Provider's Criterion
The right to the relevant activity is checked by an official register; the contract describes the storage of assets, data, liability, termination and portability.

The Bank of Russia indicates that banking operations are carried out on the basis of a license; the rights of financial market participants are checked in the official service.

15 / "Personal Bank" AS INTERFACE

The capital office is a management cabin, not a credit institution

Permissible in the interfaceUnacceptable without special status
Summary read-only review of accounts and assets by allowed connections.Accept deposits or money from an indefinite circle of persons.
Objectives, budgets, “envelopes”, reserves and cash flow forecasts.Open bank accounts on behalf of the platform.
Limits, approval routes and commitment calendar.To lend, exchange, store or manage assets on its own behalf.
Preparation of instructions to licensed providers and reconciliation of statements.Represent the internal unit of account as a legal tender.
Portfolio ECO-PPA, documents, notifications and archive package.Promise guaranteed returns, returns or insurance protection without a basis.

Technical principle
The instruction becomes a payment order only after passing the powers and execution through the bank or other authorized circuit. No automatic money transfers on the signal of the analytical model.

16 / SOURCES OF TRUTH AND COMPARISON

Each fact has its own authoritative source.

Legal law, statute, organ decision, contract, power of attorney or judicial act.

Money in the account. Licensed bank statement.

Securities and other accounting rights. document of the depositary, registrar or other legal registry.

Management distribution. fund decision and recording in the system with the confirmed version.

Actual performance. contract, primary document, act, report and supporting materials.

Result. Pre-established methodology and independent conclusion.

History. Heritage archive with origin, versions, access rights and checksums.

Sverka
The internal record cannot correct the bank statement. The discrepancy creates an incident, the owner, a deadline, a compensating record, and a re-match.

Formula
LAW → DECISION → DISSEMINATION → FOREIGN LETTER → COMPARISON → PROOF → ARCHIVE

17 / CAPITAL CYCLE AND HOUSE

Capital moves only after seven consecutive checks

GatewayThe control questionWithdrawal
G0. SourceWho is the owner and how is the origin of the asset confirmed?The permitted source.
G1. MandateWhat are the envelopes, targets, beneficiaries and constraints?Approved passport.
G2. InfrastructureWhere is the account or asset and who is entitled to the transaction?Connected provider.
G3. ProjectIs the passport ECO-PPA full and are the connections and risks disclosed?Decision on admission.
G4. CommitmentIs there a contract, budget, limit and terms of the tranche?Legal instruction.
G5. ResultIs the stage confirmed by independent evidence?Reception or stop.
G6. ClosureHow is the balance distributed, returned or reinvested?Report and archive package.

Formula
SOURCE → MANDATE → QUOTE → RESERVE → PROJECT → CONTRACT → TRANS → EXECUTION → VERIFICATION → DISTRIBUTION / RETURN → ARCHIVE

Stop-rule
If there is no mandatory document, authority or evidence, the cycle stops. The platform does not replace this gap with an automatic solution.

18 / PROJECTS ECO-PPA

ECO-PPA Transfers capital from intention to verifiable project

Formula
TASK + TECHNOLOGY + COOPERATION + CAPITAL + CONTRACT + DATA + RESULTS

Prior to solution. task owner, boundaries, baseline, alternatives, security, performers, budget, source and risk.

Prior to the contract. the powers of the parties, the subject, stages, price, data and IP rights, liability, stop conditions and dispute.

Up to the tranche. limit, calendar, account, confirmation of the previous stage, no conflict and the current authority.

After Execution. Act, evidence, independent verification, deviations, remainder, lesson and new version.

Before scaling. comparability of conditions, reproducibility of the result, stability of the economy and legality of the new perimeter.

Separation
ECO-PPA — passport and contractual-resource framework. SPECZASHCHITA Organize the execution. The independent subject confirms the result. The Funds System decides on the following capital.

19 / REGISTERS AND ARCHIVES

Six registers link law, money, project and result

RegisterContents
R1. Participants and credentialsPersonalities, roles, powers of attorney, deadlines, controlling persons and conflicts.
R2. Funds and mandatesPassports, goals, prohibitions, beneficiaries and rights.
R3. Assets and liabilitiesAccounts, instruments, reserves, encumbrances, sources and external links.
R4. Projects and contractsECO-PPA, stages, budgets, tranches, counterparties and documents.
R5. Solutions, risks and incidentsProtocols, reconciliations, challenges, exclusions, warnings and corrections.
R6. Evidence and resultsStatements, acts, measurements, conclusions, versions and verification status.

Heritage archive
Receives signed and versioned snapshots of registers, evidence packages and access rules. It does not store bank passwords, private keys and personal data beyond a reasonable need.

Formula
OBJECT → SOURCE → Versions → RIGHT OF ACCESS → DECISION → RESULTS → STORAGE TIME

20 / ROLES AND DIVISION OF CREDENTIALS

No participant controls the entire cycle.

RoleAnswersShould not simultaneously
Founder / DonorMission, source of assets and basic mandate.Perform and confirm the project.
Board / management bodyPolicies, Budget, Appointments, Exclusions and Oversight.Make your own decisions without control.
Fund AdministratorDocuments, calendar, registers and reports.Become the owner of the platform assets.
Bank / custodian / managerOperations and accounting within the contract and admission.Substitute the mission and bodies of the fund.
Operator ECO-PPAPassport, budget, contract and proof route.Self-authorize the payment.
SPECZASHCHITACo-operation performance and acceptance materials.To approve your own result alone.
Verifier / AuditorIndependent verification of results and control.Have an uncontrollable material interest.
Archive KeeperVersions, origin, access and preservation.Change the content of the official source.

The Conflict Rule
The related interest is disclosed prior to discussion. The participant does not receive materials beyond what is necessary and does not vote on an issue where his independence is violated.

21 / REWARDERS AND CONTINUATIONS

Beneficiary is not a line in the register, but a carrier of a certain right or expectation

Identification. person, class, organization or mission; in legal entities and complex structures, actual control is analyzed.

The nature of the right: unconditional, conditional, discretionary, urgent, inherited or terminated - according to applicable law and documents.

Informing. what information, with what frequency and to what extent the beneficiary receives.

Complaint and dispute. channel of appeal, independent review, timing, interim measures and archive of the decision.

Vulnerable persons. representation, pressure protection, conflict verification and proportional disclosure.

Continuity. organ replacement, death, incapacity, prolonged absence and transfer of provider functions.

Termination. Fulfillment of obligations, distribution of balance, closing of accounts, storage of documents and final report.

International benchmark
FATF recommends seeing not only the formal founder, but also individuals actually controlling the design, as well as roles affecting the purpose, veto, and distribution.

22 / DISTRIBUTION, LIQUIDITY AND RISK

Politicians translate mandate into measurable constraints

PolicyMinimum rules
Distributiongoals, recipients, conditions, limits, frequency, priorities and prohibitions.
Liquiditycommitment calendar, minimum reserve, stress scenarios and recovery plan.
InvestmentPermissible instruments, horizon, risk, diversification, commissions and responsible person.
Concentrationlimits on the bank, the manager, the issuer, the asset, the currency, the project and the related party.
Expenditureadministration, audit, management, storage, projects and disclosure of total value.
Asset valuationmethod, price source, frequency, independence and dealing with illiquidity.
Reservestype, size, replenishment, bases of use and restoration.
Deviationswho permits, for how long, what proof and how the exception is closed.

Limitation
The material does not contain promises of profitability, guarantees of return of capital or a statement of no risk. Any investment outline requires a separate qualification and an agreement with the authorized participant.

23 / RISKS, COMPLAINS AND DATA

Critical risks have a stop signal, not just an assessment

RiskBasic controlStop signal
Substitution of licensed activitiesMap of functions, names and tolerances.The platform must store or attract customer money.
Unclear propertyPassport of the asset, law and origin.The owner or nature of the right is not established.
Mixing of assetsSeparate accounts and regular reconciliations.The discrepancy with the external statement is not eliminated.
Conflict of interestDisclosure, disqualification and independent approval.The hidden side.
AML/KYC and sanction riskRisk-based participant and flow testing.Substantial discrepancy between source and control.
Data and Cyber SecurityMinimization, access, log, encryption and response.Critical leakage or loss of access control.
Cross-borderMatrix of jurisdictions, taxes, currency and reporting requirements.The stream has no confirmed mode.
Loss of managementReplacement, continuity and plan of the provider.There is no workable decision body.

Separate AML-function of the personal fund
From 30 December 2024 executive bodies of personal funds, except hereditary, are included in the special contour of duties under article 7.1 No 115-FZ. The architecture should provide for its own internal control rules, identification and interaction with Rosfinmonitoring - not only KYC banks.

Launch Rule
Taxes, AML/KYC, personal data, currency regime, reporting, protection of beneficiaries and applicability of guarantees are checked for each shell, account and operation separately.

24 / PILOT AND SOLUTION CRITERIA

90 days - Proven solution, not before financial launch

TimeframeStageVerified result
1–15PerimeterTerms, Prohibited Functions, Jurisdiction, Shells, Roles, and Metrics.
16–30Normative modelFoundation passport, governance, conflict, providers, data, and threat model.
31–55PrototypeSix registers, read-only cabinet, ECO-PPA and export to the Heritage Archive.
56–75Dry RunsContribution, distribution, tranche, failure, conflict, provider replacement and incident.
76–90Independent verificationLegal, tax, AML/KYC and information security conclusions; reconciliation; cost; GO / conditions / NO-GO.

GO
The legal perimeter is confirmed; the functions are assigned to authorized providers; the rights and sources of assets are clear; the chain "source → solution → transaction → result → archive" is reproduced; role-sharing and data protection work.

NO-GO
Unlicensed transactions are needed; assets cannot be separated; rights or source are not established; hidden guarantee of profitability is required; one participant controls the entire cycle; critical risks of data or jurisdiction are not eliminated.

Next Solution
Only after the conditional GO is the project of a limited 12-month pilot with one legal shell, partner bank or custodian, capital limits, independent control and a separate contractual package.

25 / RUSSIAN LEGAL SOURCES

Official Guidelines for the Russian Outline

The links are checked for the date of preparation. The consolidated version and the applicability of the rule are confirmed before each legally significant operation.

GK RF: Federal law from 01.07.2021 № 287-FZ About personal funds

Civil Code of the Russian Federation, current edition: provisions on personal funds

Federal law of 08.08.2024 № 237-FZ: Changes in personal fund assets

Federal law of 08.08.2024 № 251-FZ: Special rules for personal funds

Federal Tax Service of Russia: personal fund as a form of NGOs and the procedure for changing the charter

Federal Law No 7-FZ "About non-profit organizations"

Federal Law No 135-FZ "Charity and Volunteering"

Federal Law No 275-FZ About procedure for formation and use of target capital of NGOs

Bank of Russia: banks and licensed banking operations

Bank of Russia: verification of financial market participant

Bank of Russia: professional participants in the securities market

Federal Law No 115-FZ: AML/CFT and special responsibilities of personal funds

Bank of Russia: response on the application of AML/CFT requirements to personal funds

Deposit Insurance Agency: Questions and Answers

The Federal Tax Service’s materials and Bank of Russia’s responses help to interpret, but do not replace the text of the law and the individual conclusion.

26 / INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES AND STATUS

International sources are used as landmarks of architecture

Before the cross-border launch, the legal form, banking transactions, beneficial ownership, CRS, AML / KYC, taxes and data are checked for each jurisdiction.

FATF: Guidance on Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons

FATF: Beneficial Ownership and Transparency of Legal Arrangements

G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023

OECD: core principles for separation and governance of fund assets

Legal disclaimer
The document presents the author's concept of architecture and the pilot. It is not a legal, tax, investment or bank statement; it does not create rights to raise funds, issue money, accept deposits, manage other people's assets or promise profitability.

Version 1.0 · 29 August 2026 · Author: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Other published edition: System of funds Sistema_fondov_Lichnye_i_imennye_fondy_i_banki.pptx · Web Text +

Personal and personal funds on licensed banking infrastructure

The mandate is set by the fund.

Operations are performed by licensed participants.

The evidence preserves the Heritage Archive.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Accounts show money but do not explain mandate

THE PROBLEM

Fragmented contour

Unresolved issues

Who has the right to make a decision?

Remnant and Movement

QUOTE

For whom and under what conditions?

Obligation

AGREEMENT

What is the risk and what reserve is allowed?

internal classification

TABLE

Who is the one who confirms, confirms and confirms?

What will happen to conflict or continuity?

Evidence and Versions

Papka

Without a mandate, money can be accounted for correctly — and misused.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The solution now is a 90-day design pilot

REQUEST FOR SOLUTION

Perimeter

Terms, Prohibitions, Jurisdiction, Shells, and Participants.

Normative model

Fund passport, roles, policies, providers and data.

DAYS

Prototype

Six registers, read-only cabinet, ECO-PPA and archive package.

without attracting funds

without financial launch

Dry Runs

Deposit, tranche, rejection, conflict, incident and replacement of the provider.

Independent verification

Law, Taxes, AML/KYC, IS, Cost and GO/NO-GO.

Output: Proven GO, Conditional GO or NO-GO

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Five concepts should not be confused

TERMS AND BORDERS

Management model of a person or family

PERSONAL FINANCIAL CONTOUR

separate legal shell; not an account and not a bank

PERSONAL FUND

mission and identity; the name does not create an OPF

NAMED FUND / PROGRAM

special regime of property of NGOs, not a separate legal entity

TARGET CAPITAL

Licensed accounts, payments and other transactions

BANKING CONTOUR

The word “fund” describes the idea only after checking the legal shell, the owner of the assets and the mode of operations.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The system of funds connects the forecast with the legal decision on capital

LOCATION IN THE ECOSYSTEM

EQUILIBRIUM

FUND SYSTEM

BANK / CASTODIAN

ECO-PPA

RESULT

Signal • Scenario • Risk

Mandate • law • budget

account • transaction • account

contract • stage • tranche

Act • Measurement • Acceptance

HERITAGE ARCHIVE

origin • version • access rights • proof • continuity

SFERA

initiatives • participants • knowledge • feedback • scaling

EQUILIBRIUM does not move money. The system of funds does not execute the project. The archive does not rewrite the source.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Each fund is a node of six mandatory layers

ARCHITECTURE OF THE Knot

WILL, PURPOSE AND RIGHTS

Founder / Donor • Mission • Beneficiaries

CONTROL

AML/KYC

TAXES

DATA

KIBER

AUDIT

LEGAL SENSE

Charter • bodies • competence • succession

ASSETS AND COMMITMENTS

owner • accounts • tools • reserves

LICENSE INFRASTRUCTURE

Bank • Depositary • Broker • Managing Director

PROJECT CONTOUR

ECO-PPA • Contract • budget • Trench • acceptance

PROOF AND HERITAGE

Decisions • Statements • Acts • Version • Archive

Passing one layer turns the idea into an uncontrollable exception.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The type of fund is defined by the task, not the name

ARCHETIPS

ARCHETIP

TASK

KEY CONTROL

Personal / Family

Continuity of capital

rights and substitution of organs

Name

Mission Name or Territory

Name does not replace status

Endowment

Long-term mission

Mode 275-FZ and expenditure

Charitable

Publicly Helpful

Selection and targeted use

Project

Measurable result ECO-PPA

contract, tranches, acceptance

Standby

liquidity and continuity

Terms of Use and Recovery

Developments

Technology and Cooperation

Risk without promised return

The legal form is selected separately for each purpose, jurisdiction, asset and membership.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Personal fund manages continuity; personal - mission

TWO DIFFERENT VECTORS

PERSONAL FUND

NAMED FUND / PROGRAM

Legal Shell

Mission and Identity

  • Separate unitary NPO; property belongs to the fund.
  • When creating: property of the founder of 100 million ₽, Except the inheritance fund.
  • The rights of beneficiaries, bodies and substitution scenarios are fixed by documents.
  • With 30.12.2024 executive body, in addition to the hereditary fund, has its own AML-duties.
  • There is no separate “name fund”.
  • Possible: the name of the NGO, the program within the NGO, a separate target capital or a personal fund with a personal mission.
  • The name requires consent, rules of use, reputational limitations and continuity.
  • Accounts and contracts belong to the real organization, not the name of the program.

Checked on the date of establishment

Name creates mission; documents create rights

It is impossible to promise automatic protection of assets, tax neutrality or guaranteed safety.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The Bank performs operations, the system manages the mandate

LIMIT OF LICENSE

FUND SYSTEM

BANK / CASTODIAN / MANAGING

  • Fund passport, mandate and beneficiaries
  • Budgets, limits, reserves and calendar
  • Route of approvals and preparation of instructions
  • Read-only review of extracts and reconciliation
  • ECO-PPA, documents, incidents and archive
  • Opening and maintaining a bank account
  • Payment and bank statement
  • Brokerage operation and report
  • Depository or registry account
  • Asset management within the license

AUTHORIZED

INSTRUCTION

Stop: Accept deposits, open accounts with customers, store or transfer their money, promise guarantees or returns without status.

Secure name of the interface: "Capital Cabinet" or "Personal Treasury".

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Capital passes seven locks G0-G6

CAPITAL CYCLE

SOURCE

MANDATE

INFRA

PROJECT

COMMITMENT

RESULT

CLOSING

owner and origin

shell, purpose, rights

Account and Authority

ECO-PPA and risks

contract, limit, tranche

independent proof

remainder, report, archive

SOURCE → MANDATE → QUOTE → RESERVE → PROJECT → CONTRACT → TRANS → VERIFICATION → ALLOCATION → ARCHIVE

There is no mandatory document, authority or proof - the cycle stops.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

ECO-PPA turns capital into a verifiable project

PROJECT CONTOUR

TASK + TECHNOLOGY + COOPERATION + CAPITAL + CONTRACT + DATA + RESULTS

BEFORE DECISION

BEFORE THE TREATY

BEFORE TRANSHA

AFTER EXECUTIVE

owner of the task • baseline • alternatives • security • budget • risk

authority • Subject • Stages • price • Data and IP • Responsibility • Dispute

limit • calendar • invoice • previous stage • conflict • current power

act • actual data • independent verification • deviations • remainder • lesson

ECO-PPA — passport and contractual-resource framework. SPECZASHCHITA Organize the execution. The independent subject confirms the result. The system of funds decides what is next with the capital.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Six Registers and the Heritage Archive Preserve the Evidence Chain

DATA AND CONTINUITY

ATTENDANCE AND CREDENTIALS

FUNDS AND MANDATES

ARCHIVE

HERITAGE

ASSETS AND COMMITMENTS

PROJECTS AND CONTRACTS

Signed pictures

Versions and Origin

Access Rights

Control amounts

Storage time

SOLUTIONS, RISKS, INCIDENTS

PROOF AND RESULTS

OBJECT → SOURCE → Versions → RIGHT OF ACCESS → DECISION → RESULTS → STORAGE TIME

The archive does not store bank passwords and does not change the content of the official source.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

No participant controls the entire cycle.

DIVISION OF CREDENTIALS

PROBLEMS

PERFORMANCE

CONFIRMS

Founder / Donor

Bank / custodian / manager

Independent Verifier

Board / management body

Operator ECO-PPA

Auditor / Compliance

Funds system

SPECZASHCHITA

Archive Keeper

The contractor does not confirm its own result. The internal platform does not become the owner of the assets.

The conflict is revealed before the discussion; the participant is withdrawn if independence is violated.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Risks have stop signs, not just estimates

COMPLAINS AND DATA

RISK

STOP SIGNAL

Substitution of license

The platform needs to store customer money

Unclear property

The owner or nature of the right is not established

Mixing of assets

Difference with external statement is not eliminated

Conflict of interest

The Hidden Linked Side

AML/KYC and sanctions

Significantly unclear source or control

Data and cyber risk

Leakage or loss of access control

Cross-border

no confirmed flow mode

Specific oversight of a personal fund: since 30.12.2024, the executive body, except in the case of a hereditary fund, has its own obligations under Article 7.1 of No. 115-FZ — not only the bank’s KYC requirements.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

90 days - proven GO, not before financial launch

NEXT DECISION

1–15

16–30

31–55

56–75

76–90

PERIMETER

MODEL

PROTOTIP

PROGONGS

VERIFICATION

terms • prohibitions • shell

Passport • Roles • Policy

registers • office • archive

tranche • failure • conflict

right • AML • IS • cost

unlicensed functions are required or the right is not established

perimeter is legal and the chain is replicable

gaps are limited, there are owners and deadlines

USL. GO

NO-GO

Approve the design pilot. Financial startup is a separate solution after a conditional or full GO.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Sources cited in presentation 24

  • Project-bound AI-generated hero image; no external URL.
  • Bank of Russia, banking operations and licensing — https://cbr.ru/admissionfinmarket/navigator/banks/
  • Bank of Russia, banks and banking operations — https://cbr.ru/admissionfinmarket/navigator/banks/
  • G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 — https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/g20-oecd-principles-of-corporate-governance-2023_ed750b30-en/full-report/component-8.html
  • Bank of Russia, verification of financial market participants — https://cbr.ru/finorg/
  • Civil Code of the Russian Federation, current edition — https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102033239
  • Russian Federation Civil Code — https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102033239
  • Federal Law No 275-FZ — https://www.pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&link_id=0&nd=102111248
  • Bank of Russia, banking operations — https://cbr.ru/admissionfinmarket/navigator/banks/
  • OECD, governance and separation of fund assets — https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/public/doc/344/fa84ef90-e2bd-4171-802a-b5c15aa3106d.html
  • FATF, beneficial ownership of legal persons — https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Guidance-Beneficial-Ownership-Legal-Persons.html
  • Federal Law No 7-FZ — https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102039064
  • Federal Law No 135-FZ — https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102037027
  • Federal Law No 287-FZ — https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202107010047
  • Federal Law No 237-FZ — https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202408080033
  • Federal Law No 251-FZ — https://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50918
  • Federal Tax Service of Russia, personal fund — https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn37/news/activities_fts/16339647/
  • Federal Law No 115-FZ — https://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102072376
  • Bank of Russia, banks — https://cbr.ru/admissionfinmarket/navigator/banks/
  • Bank of Russia, verification of financial market participant — https://cbr.ru/finorg/
  • Bank of Russia, professional participants — https://cbr.ru/admissionfinmarket/navigator/purcb/
  • FATF, transparency of legal arrangements — https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Guidance-Beneficial-Ownership-Transparency-Legal-Arrangements.html
  • Bank of Russia, response to the application of AML/CFT to personal funds — https://www.cbr.ru/Queries/UniDbQuery/File/104594/342/A
  • FATF, beneficial ownership — https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Guidance-Beneficial-Ownership-Legal-Persons.html

Published files

Finance · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM Counting System

Source Status: Primary Document

A concept for a unified counting system recording resources, obligations, results and balances.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/schetnaya-sistema-equilibrium

Open on the site

LEDGER • 19 BALANCES • 13 PHASES • 741 CONTROL

Concept: Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov

August 2026

02 / SUMMARY

Accounting becomes the contour of development management

Not an accounting program, but a common language linking the right, resource, decision, action and proven result.

The system solves five tasks

  • Creates a unified picture of rights, assets, liabilities, risks and outcomes on three scales: person, state, planet.
  • It does not allow replacing the fact with a promise: the project result is separated from the application, financing and reporting.
  • Connects 13 the Life Cycle Phases 19 balance sheets; matrix 3 × 13 × 19 = 741 the Control Completeness Map.
  • Shares roles: EQUILIBRIUM analyzes, IAC prepares options, ECO‑PPA Designing, SPECZASHCHITA Executes, SFERA Collects initiatives and scales, ESG>IR Confirms.
  • Makes the adjustment a regular function: the erroneous entry is not erased, but corrected by a new related event.

Status: author's system concept. Terms, legal regimes, set of indicators and integration are subject to separate legal, metrological and technical verification.

03 / MODEL CHANGE

The usual accounting answers "how much", the new system - "why and with what effect"

ContourThe traditional modelEQUILIBRIUM Counting System
ObjectMoney, property, wiring.Rights, resources, obligations, decisions, actions, risks, results, knowledge.
Basisprimary document.Legal mandate + consent + version of methodology + digital proof.
MomentThe fact of the operation.Full life cycle: from signal to adjustment.
Valuevalue in monetary unit.Monetary value + physical indicators + social and natural value.
MonitoringVerification and audit after the fact.Preliminary limits, monitoring, verification, independent audit, feedback.
ResultBalance and reporting.19 balance sheets with proven causation and liability.

04 / Objects

Nine objects form an object model

ObjectWhat countsMandatory identifier
Meaning / PurposeDesired change and social mandate.purpose, author, version, deadline
SubjectMan, organization, territory, state, natural object.sustainable ID, authority, role
RightAccess, ownership, demand, license, consent.reason, obligor, term
ResourceMoney, time, labor, data, energy, water, land, infrastructure.owner, unit, quality, limitation
CommitmentDebt, contract, standard, guarantee, promised result.creditor, debtor, term, security
ProjectLimited contour of resource conversion to result.mandate, budget, plan, responsible
ActionAuthorized status change.performer, time, entrance, exit
RiskPossible deviation and damage.owner, probability, limit, coverage
Result / knowledgeProven change and learned lesson.metric, baseline, proof, version

Archetypes are used as a classifier of sustainable roles and behaviors. They do not replace legal status and do not create automatic rights or obligations.

05 / EVENT

Universal Event Passport - Atom System

BlockFieldsMonitoring
IdentityID, type, time, place, version.uniqueness, synchronization, immutability
Basislaw, mandate, agreement, limit.power, term, consistency
Subjectsinitiator, owner, executor, beneficiary, validator.Division of roles, conflict of interest
Sign inright, resource, obligation, data, risk.ownership, quality, accessibility, burden
Actionsolution, reservation, transfer, delivery, change.authorization, sequence, finality
Withdrawalnew condition, result, residue, side effect.Balance, double account
Evidencesignature, document, measurement, photo/sensor, expert opinion.origin, integrity, independence
Responsibilityowner of risk, SLA, insurance, dispute, adjustment.Limit, Escalation, Recovery

06 / REGISTERS

Six linked registers give a holistic picture

R1 Subjects and powers

who can initiate, negotiate, execute, own, verify and challenge

R2 Rights and Assets

What is owned, available, transferred, limited or under a burden

R3 Obligations and risks

Who, what, to whom and for what period of time owes; what can disrupt the performance

R4 Resources and funding

cash and non-cash sources, reserves, limits, actual use

R5 Projects and activities

plans, solutions, contracts, work packages, performers, dependencies

R6 Results and evidence

Before/After Measurements, Attribution, Audit, Lessons, Reasons for Payment and Adjustments

07 / SHOWS

Three scales of accounting do not mix, but are checked

ScaleCenter of AccountingWhat can not be lostForm of consolidation
Personpersonal contour of rights, opportunities, obligations and results; if necessary - a personal fund.dignity, consent, privacy, the right to explanation and appeal.aggregation without disclosure of unnecessary personal data.
Statepopulation, territories, industries, infrastructure, finance, sovereign powers.law, budgetary responsibility, national security, autonomy of decisions.official statistics, registers and project passports with versionability.
PlanetGlobal flows and common natural systems.No double counting, cross-border effects, fair distribution.compatible methods and independent evidence without a global monopolist.

The design outline and organization can act as intermediate levels, but when calculating the matrix 741 are reduced to one of three basic scales.

08 / DOUBLE NOTES

Advanced wiring links source, use and balance effect

Record SideContentsExample
SourceLaw, budget, asset, time, competence, natural limit.The fund reserves the educational limit.
UseContract, action, delivery, change of status.The training program is provided by an accredited provider.
CommitmentWho is responsible for the term, quality, return or correction.The provider is responsible for the result and disclosure of the methodology.
EvidenceThis confirms the fact and causal connection.Signed act, before/after skill measurement, independent sampling.
Balance vectorPositive, neutral and negative changes along 19 contours.Increasing knowledge while controlling time, finances, and availability.
AdjustmentA new event in case of error, rejection or change of conditions.Part of the payment is returned; the method receives a new version.

09 / BALANCE

19 Balance Sheets — Management Workflow

GroupBalances
Person1 Dignity and rights; 2 Demography and family; 3 Health; 4 Knowledge and education; 5 Culture and meanings.
Society6 Trust and social cohesion; 7 Law and administration; 8 Security; 9 Labour and employment.
Economy10 Manufacturing and entrepreneurship; 11 Finance; 12 Technology and data; 13 Infrastructure and logistics.
Nature14 Energy; 15 Water; 16 Soil and food; 17 Climate and atmosphere; 18 Biodiversity.
Reproduction19 Time and strategic sustainability: the ability to maintain what has been achieved and act in the future.

For each balance, a passport, status metrics, allowable corridor, threat threshold, owner, data sources, periodicity, aggregation rule, and adjustment scenario are approved.

  • A positive effect in one balance does not justify hidden damage in another.
  • Monetary valuation is applied where it is appropriate; physical, legal and qualitative indicators remain independent.
  • The nomenclature is working and must be fixed by a separate dictionary of versions.

10 / CYCLE

13 phases turn signal into controlled adjustment

№PhaseManagement result
1Signalrecord a change or initiative
2AttributionIdentify the source, subject and affected contour
3Base LineMeasure the initial state
4Goalset the desired result and limits
5ScenarioCompare options and side effects
6Decisionapprove the mandate, owner and criteria
7Resourcereserve money, time, data and power
8Contractsecuring obligations, risk and evidence
9Actionexecute the project package
10ObservationCollecting actual events and deviations
11Verificationcheck the fact, quality and causality
12CalculationRecognise rights, payments, obligations and balances
13Adjustmentchange a rule, resource, project or goal

11 / MATRICA 741

3 × 13 × 19 = 741 — map of completeness, not mystical number

Cell StatusValueAction
0 - no datano signal or measurementAppoint source and deadline
1 - observationdata is available, but the decision is not required / not acceptedCheck quality and threshold
2 - Riskcorridor is broken or insufficient evidenceEscalation to the owner of risk
3 — managementmandate, resource and action recordedMonitoring of execution
4 — proventhe result is verified and taken into accountcalculation and replication
5 — adjustmentconditions have changed or an error has been identifiedcreate a new version related event

The matrix can be filled gradually. The sign of maturity is not “741 green cell”, but the absence of unknown critical areas, transparent responsibility and timely movement of statuses.

12 / ARCHETIPS

20 archetypes × 13 tones = 260 — the semantic layer of the Ledger

Model 260 is used as a map of typical roles and conversion rhythms. The unit "kin" denotes the completed semantic event in the 13 phase cycle. This layer helps to categorize initiatives and harmonize the language of participants, but does not replace measurement, law, and financial accounting.

ContactPurposeLimitation
Archetype → roledescribes a sustainable way of participation: initiator, keeper, converter, binder, etc.not assigned to a person as an immutable label
Tone → phaseindicates the nature of the step: setting, coordination, action, verification, completion.does not cancel the actual sequence of the event
Keen → eventIt unites the goal, subject, action and result in one semantic unit.obtains legal force only through confirmed grounds
260 → LibraryProvides repeatable scenarios and design patterns.not used as an automatic forecast or rating

13 / ARCHITECTURE

The contours of the system are divided by authority

ContourRoleDoesn't
SFERACollects initiatives, builds communities, provides access and scaling.does not confirm the effect and does not dispose of other people's powers
EQUILIBRIUMobserves 19 balance sheets, analyzes scenarios, conducts matrix 741 and the correction circuit.does not substitute for a legal subject of the decision
IACprepares solutions, forecasts, models and analytical notes.does not make power decisions
ECO‑PPAtranslates the script into a legally, financially and technologically verifiable project.Not performing work without a specific mandate
SPECZASHCHITAorganizes cooperative execution, protection, supply and operational discipline.does not confirm its own result alone
ESG‑IRprovides independent evidence and methodical control of the result.does not finance or select a project instead of a customer
Ledgerconnects events, versions, signatures, evidence and balance effects.It is not a single database of all the data.

14 / LEDGER

The ledger stores evidence, not gathers everything in one place.

LayerContentsAccess Mode
Opendictionaries, methods, aggregates, versions of rules, public decisions and indicators.Public, Machine Readable
Evidentiaryidentifiers, timestamps, signatures, hashes, links to sources, verification status.Role and Legal Basis
Operationcontracts, budgets, work packages, measurements, execution logs.Process participants and control bodies
ProtectedPersonal data, trade secrets, sensitive infrastructure.minimum necessary access, journaling
Archivaloriginal versions, proof of finality, decisions on disputes, migration logs.Long-term preservation and integrity testing
  • The data remains with the rightful owners; the common layer stores verifiable links and statuses.
  • Every read and change of sensitive data is recorded as an event.
  • The algorithmic solution should be explainable, challenging and reproducible according to the model version.
  • Public transparency is achieved by aggregating, not disclosing, personal records.

15 / FINANCE

Funding follows mandate, risk and provable result

ContourPurposeAccounting rule
Name FundTargeted human development rights and resources.source, assignment, limit, supplier selection, result, appeal
Project Fund / SPVIsolation of budget, assets, liabilities and project risk.segregation of funds, waterfall, reserves, covenants, audit
Territorial Fundportfolio of infrastructure and natural programs.effects and obligations are not mixed between territories without a mandate
ECO‑PPAlong-term agreement to mobilize resources before the threat is realized.baseline, guaranteed result, price, risk, verifier, adjustment
Payment for the resultPart of the calculation comes after independent confirmation.unconfirmed effect is not recognized as a final asset

16 / MANAGEMENT

Decision, execution and verification should not belong to one party

RoleCredentialsMonitoring
Balance holderapproves the corridor, thresholds, KPI and corrective measures.public mandate, conflict of interest, reporting
Data Ownerensures the quality, origin and legality of access.versioning, access log, independent sampling
Project customerAccepts purpose, budget, contract and risk appetite.examination, limits, change control
Person carrying out the workPerform the action and provide the primary evidence.SLA, acceptance, insurance, liability
ValidatorTest the method, fact and causal connection.accreditation, rotation, prohibition of self-examination
Auditor / OmbudsmanCheck the system and handle complaints.access to version history, independent assignment
Collegiate Councilchanges the dictionaries, rules and thresholds of the system.quorum, protocol, public justification, date of entry

17 / PROTECTION

The anti-manipulation circuit is built into the record itself

ThreatHow it manifests itselfMandatory fuse
Double AccountOne result is announced by several projects.unique effect ID, attribution boundaries, general redemption register
Baseline SubstitutionThe starting point changes after the result.preliminary fixation and version of the method
Self-checkThe executor confirms his own effect.independent validator, rotation and responsibility
Control captureThe rules change in favor of the related group.public protocols, conflict of interest, veto power at critical risk
Hidden SurveillanceData is used outside of the original purpose.minimization, targeted consent, access log, sanctions
Model riskThe algorithm error becomes a massive decision.model version, drift tests, manual stop, right to explanation
Delete HistoryInconvenient recording disappears or is rewritten.immutable log and compensating events
Transfer of damageThe growth of one balance creates a hidden minus in the other.balance vector 19 contours and total damage limit

18 / PILOT

The pilot is built around one real cycle, not the entire platform.

The recommended first contour: territorial program "water - soil - health" with the participation of residents, the state, scientific organizations, business and an independent validator. It simultaneously checks rights, physical indicators, project financing and evidentiary calculation.

PeriodResultTransition criterion
0–30 daysmandate, pilot boundaries, object dictionary, 19 balances, owners and stop conditions.Roles, data sources and legal bases approved
31–60 dayspassport events, six registers, baseline, effect methodology, threat model.Reproducible recording test and independent verification
61–100 daysdigital cycle twin of 13 phases and filling of critical cells 741.through tracing from signal to adjustment
4–12 monthsLimited real-world project with ECO‑PPA and SPECZASHCHITA.Results, Disputes and Recovery are Controlled
12–24 monthsportfolio of projects and interregional compatibility.reduction of manual reconciliations and absence of double counting
24–36 monthsstandardization package and cross-border sandbox.Regulatory decisions and independent sustainability assessment

19 / SOLUTION

First solution launches standard, pilot and independent verification

To start, you need to approve a package of eight documents:

  1. The doctrine of the Counting System: purpose, values, limits of what is permissible, and participants’ rights.
  2. Vocabulary of objects, events, 19 Balance Sheets, 13 Phases and Statuses of the Matrix 741.
  3. Model of authority and division of roles between SFERA, EQUILIBRIUM, IAC, ECO‑PPA, SPECZASHCHITA and ESG‑IR.
  4. Universal event passport and scheme of six related registers.
  5. Rules of evidence, version of methods, independent verification and corrective records.
  6. Data architecture, privacy, cyber resilience, archival storage and integrations.
  7. Mandate of 100-day pilot: territory, budget, risk holders, KPI and stop conditions.
  8. Regulations on independent legal, metrological, technical, ethical and public expertise.

Concept: Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov • EQUILIBRIUM • Editorial Board 1.0 • August 2026

Another published edition: EQUILIBRIUM COUNTING SYSTEM Schetnaya_sistema_Equilibrium.pptx · web text +

Accounting for rights, resources, obligations, actions and proven results

LEDGER • 19 BALANCES • 13 PHASES • 741

Concept: Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov

August 2026

Accounting becomes development management

TEZIS

Each change in state passes through a verifiable event.

LAW

Who can

RESOURCE

What is provided

NETWORK

BOOK

COMMITMENT

Who is responsible

ACTION

What's done

RESULT

What is proved

The usual answer is "how many"

MODEL CHANGE

The new system adds “why, who is responsible and with what effect”.

CONTOUR

TRADITIONAL MODEL

EQUILIBRIUM

Object

money and property

rights, resources, risks, decisions, results

Moment

fact of operation

cycle from signal to adjustment

Value

monetary value

money + physical and social indicators

Monitoring

audit after the fact

limits, surveillance, verification, feedback

Result

Balance and reporting

Proven change 19 balance sheets

Extended double entry: every use has a source, every right has an obligation, every result has proof.

Nine objects must be connected

SUBJECT MODEL

Meaning / Purpose

Project

desired change

Transformation Contour

Subject

Action

Who has the power

Authorized Change

Right

Risk

What is allowed and who is obliged

possible deviation and damage

Resource

Result / knowledge

money, time, data, nature

Measured effect and lesson

Commitment

The archetype describes the role, but does not replace the legal status.

Who, what and by what date

Universal passport - atom of the system

EVENT

ID & TIME

Type • Place • Version

BASIC

Law • Mandate • Contract • Consent

SUBJECTS

Initiator • Owner • Performer • Validator

ENTRANCE

right • resource • obligation • risk

ACTION

solution • reservation • supply • change

EXIT

new condition • result • residue • side effect

PROOF

Signature • Document • Dimension • Expert Review

RESPONSIBILITY

Limit • SLA • dispute • adjustment

The error is not erased: a compensating event is created with a reference to the cause and version.

Six registers give a complete picture

REGISTERS

Subjects and powers

Who can initiate, possess, execute, verify and challenge

Rights and assets

What is owned, available, limited or burdened

Commitments and risks

Who, what, and by what date should

Resources and funding

sources, reserves, limits and actual use

Projects and actions

solutions, contracts, work packages and performers

Results and evidence

Before/after measurements, attribution, audit and lessons

A single event identifier links the record in all affected registers.

Man, state and planet are being tested

MASSAGES

The decision is made at the minimum sufficient level.

PLANET

HUMANITY

STATE

Dignity • Consent • Privacy • Right of explanation

HUMANITY

STATE

Right • Budget • Security • Sovereign Autonomy

PLANET

cross-border effects • no double counting

19 contours show the solution price

BALANCE

The growth of one balance does not justify the hidden damage in the other.

HUMANITY

Dignity • Demography • Health • Knowledge • Culture

01–05

SOCIETY

Trust • Law • Safety • Labor

06–09

ECONOMY

Production • Finance • Technology • Infrastructure

10–13

NATURE

energy • water • soil • climate • biodiversity

14–18

REPRODUCTION

time and strategic sustainability

For each balance: passport • corridor • threat threshold • owner • data • adjustment.

13 phases convert signal to correction

CYCLE

Signal

Attribution

Baseline

Goal

Scenario

Decision

Resource

Contract

Action

Observation

Verification

Calculation

Adjustment

The cycle is nonlinear: risk returns the system to the desired phase, but history is not lost.

= 741

MATRICA FULL

3 × 13 × 19 = 741

Scale

Phases

Balance Sheets

NO DATA

Appoint source and deadline

OBSERVATION

Check quality and threshold

RISK

Escalation of the owner

GOVERNANCE

Monitoring of execution

PROVEN

calculation and replication

ADJUSTMENT

create a new version event

741 - engineering map of unknown areas, responsibility and evidence.

20 × 13

SEMANTICS

260 explains the meaning; 741 - control

ARCHETIP

sustainable role and mode of participation

= 260

TON

pitch character in 13-phase cycle

Archetypes × tones

KIN

completed semantic event

The archetypal layer does not create automatic rights, ratings, or predictions. Legal force arises only through a confirmed basis.

Powers are divided by contours

ARCHITECTURE

SFERA

EQUILIBRIUM

IAC

ECO‑PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

ESG‑IR

Initiatives

surveillance

options

draft

execution

verification

LEDGER

Version • signatures • proofs • balance effects • adjustments

No circuit should simultaneously select, execute and confirm its own result.

History is protected from substitution

PROOF

STAGESCONDITIONS

IMmutability

original record is saved

No owner of critical risk

VERSION

The method is fixed until the result

No limit and no source of coverage

baseline changed after result

INDEPENDENCE

The perpetrator does not prove himself.

double effect count detected

ORIGIN

Every proof has a source.

The decision cannot be explained or contested.

The final calculation is blocked until the evidence is restored.

0–30

PILOT

One real cycle in 100 days

Recommended contour: territory "water - soil - health".

31–60

61–100

MANDATE

METHODICS

DIGITAL DOUBLE

• Roles • 19 Balances • Stop

passport events • registers • baseline • threats

13 Phases • Critical Cells 741 • Dispute Test

Success criterion: One reproducible route from signal to correction - with authority, resource, action, and proof.

Approve standard, pilot and check

DECISION

Doctrine and the Limits of Permissible

Rules of Evidence and Adjustments

Dictionary of objects, 19 balances and 13 phases

Data, privacy and archive architecture

Model of authority and division of roles

Mandate 100-day pilot

Passport events and six registers

Independent legal and technical expertise

SYSL → LAW → RESOURCES → COMMITMENT → ACTION → PROVEN RESULTS → CALCULATION → ADJUSTMENT

Published files

Finance · Full published text

Funds of NPK “NPO SPECZASHCHITA”

Source Status: Primary Document

Register and presentation of the cooperative funds system and their functional purposes.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/fondy-npk-npo-speczashchita

Open on the site

"Scientific and Production Association "SPECZASHCHITA"

Version 1.0

26 August 2026

1. Final classification

Status of records F-001-F-008: provided by the Charter; actual formation and size are not confirmed by the submitted document

The status of the record F-009: defined by the Charter and provided for as the purpose of the activity; for operational creation, it is advisable to decide on the General Meeting as a "other fund"

Status of records F-010-F-012: authorized or mentioned types of future funds; direct establishment by Charter not confirmed

UM-001: share of the current member - share of the development fund and the accounting/management mechanism, not an independent general economic fund

PR-001: creation of NPF - a program goal that requires a separate legal and regulated contour

2. Consolidated fixed assets register

CodeNameStatusPrimary purposeBasis
F-001cooperative share fund Cooperative (stock capital)Directly established by the Charter; the basic property fund. The actual size and availability of assets require verification by accounting data.One of the main sources of formation of cooperative property.Art. 1, Page. 3; PT. 20.3, 21.1-21.6, Page. 22-23; p. 25.1, Page. 24; p. 32.6, Page. 26
F-002Indivisible FundDirectly provided for by the Charter; part cooperative share fund, not distributed among cooperative members.Preservation of a separate part of the property of the Cooperative, which is not subject to distribution between cooperative members.Art. 1, Page. 3; PT. 25.2-25.3, Page. 24; PT. 32.4, 32.6, Page. 26
F-003Cooperative Development FundDirectly provided for by the Charter; named part cooperative share fund and at the same time property of special status.Development of data transmission systems, transportation of goods and documents, provision of services, financial and other calculations, solution of production and organizational tasks; material and financial basis of cooperative projects.Art. 1, Page. 3-4; p. 2.6, Page. 5; p. 20.4, Page. 22; PT. 22.1-24.7, Page. 23-24; p. 32.5, Page. 26
F-004Cooperative Infrastructure Investment and Development Fund (Cooperative Investment Fund)Directly provided for by the Charter; a special status trust fund.Comprehensive development of market and other infrastructure of direct interaction between the consumer and the producer, development of investment activity of the consumer, including the creation of consumer ownership of the means of production.p. 1, page 3; item 25.2-25.3, page 24
F-005Reserve FundDirectly provided by the Charter; internal provision for loss coverage.Coverage of expenses and losses from extraordinary circumstances; coverage of the formed losses of the Cooperative after approval of the annual balance sheet.Art. 1, Page. 3; PT. 25.2-25.3, 26.1, 27.3, Page. 24-25
F-006Insurance FundDirectly provided for by the Charter; internal fund for covering the risks of the cooperative.Insurance of various risks related to the activities of the Cooperative.p. 1, page 3; item 25.2-25.3, page 24
F-007Guarantee and Surety FundDirectly included in the list of funds is article 25.2; special liability fund.Ensuring the guarantee and guarantee obligations of the Cooperative and/or its members within a separate provision and contracts.p. 23.2, p. 23; p. 25.2-25.3, p. 24
F-008Cooperative Members’ Mutual Assistance FundDirectly included in the list of funds of article 25.2; internal social and financial fund.Mutual assistance to the members of the cooperative. Specific forms of assistance by the Charter are not disclosed.p. 25.2-25.3, p. 24; the purposes of mutual assistance are also reflected in art. 3, p. 6-8

3. Passports of fixed assets

Each passport separates the direct content of the Charter from the issues that must be resolved by internal regulations and confirmed by accounting documents.

F-001 cooperative share fund Co-operatives (share capital)

Statutory statusDirectly established by the Charter; the basic property fund. The actual size and availability of assets require verification by accounting data.
Sources of fundingshare contributions; according to the definition of Article 1, also annual, voluntary and other contributions in cooperative share fund. share contribution are allowed by money, securities, land, other property, property and other rights that have a monetary valuation.
PurposeOne of the main sources of formation of cooperative property.
Solutions and managementThe amount of the entrance and unit contributions and the procedure for their payment is determined by the General Assembly. The council can provide installments. The Fund's regulations are adopted under the general procedure of article 25.3.
Limitations and controlsThe entry fee of cooperative share fund is not included and is not refundable upon exit. The entrance fee does not give the right to cooperative payments. For the entrance and share contributions, as well as targeted deposits, you can not apply for recovery of personal debts cooperative member.
Regime in liquidationResidual property, except for an indivisible fund, is distributed after settlements with creditors according to the rules of article 32.6; settlements with members depend on the regime of specific property and unit rights.
Key ambiguityArticle 1 and paragraph 25.1 did not contain the same list of sources; annual and voluntary contributions should be reflected in the regulations and accounting policies.
Basis under the CharterArt. 1, Page. 3; PT. 20.3, 21.1-21.6, Page. 22-23; p. 25.1, Page. 24; p. 32.6, Page. 26

Recommended status in the working register: "Prescribed by the Charter; actual formation and size are not confirmed."

F-002 Indivisible fund

Statutory statusDirectly provided for by the Charter; part cooperative share fund, not distributed among cooperative members.
Sources of fundingIt stands out from cooperative share fund; other sources and standards of replenishment are not established by the Charter.
PurposePreservation of a separate part of the property of the Cooperative, which is not subject to distribution between cooperative members.
Solutions and managementThe definition of Article 1 allows for the decision of the Council or the General Assembly on the creation and formation. The general rule of paragraph 25.3 requires a provision to be approved by the General Assembly on the proposal of the Council.
Limitations and controlsNot distributed among cooperative members. It is necessary to separately determine the composition of assets, the rules for replacing property and the procedure for documenting the asset to the fund.
Regime in liquidationUpon liquidation, the division is not subject to and is transferred to another consumer society or cooperative by decision of the General Meeting.
Key ambiguityThere is a procedural ambiguity between the Council's power in defining Article 1 and the General Assembly's general competence under paragraph 25.3.
Basis under the CharterArt. 1, Page. 3; PT. 25.2-25.3, Page. 24; PT. 32.4, 32.6, Page. 26

Recommended status in the working register: "Prescribed by the Charter; actual formation and size are not confirmed."

F-003 Cooperative Development Fund

Statutory statusDirectly provided for by the Charter; named part cooperative share fund and at the same time property of special status.
Sources of fundingVoluntary earmarked and non-refundable contributions; targeted share contributions; contributions to the development of the Cooperative (IRK); project property and cooperative members transferred to management in the manner prescribed by the documents.
PurposeDevelopment of data transmission systems, transportation of goods and documents, provision of services, financial and other calculations, solution of production and organizational tasks; material and financial basis of cooperative projects.
Solutions and managementThe General Meeting adopts the Fund Regulation. Active members participate in management through share funds; associate members are recorded in current and depo accounts without the right to form a share fund. The accounting system may be serviced by a trustee appointed by the Board.
Limitations and controlsFor each contribution, the project, refund, form, assessment of non-cash contribution and return conditions should be determined. The Charter mentions the governing bodies of the Fund, but does not determine their composition and competence.
Regime in liquidationAssets formed from earmarked units are subject to division, taking into account the size and content of the share funds of the full members and the accounts of the associate members as of the date of the liquidation decision.
Key ambiguityThe Charter simultaneously uses the constructions of part cooperative share fund, property cooperative members in the management and property of the Cooperative of special status. It is required to unambiguously fix the ownership, balance sheet, valuation and return regime of each type of asset.
Basis under the CharterArt. 1, Page. 3-4; p. 2.6, Page. 5; p. 20.4, Page. 22; PT. 22.1-24.7, Page. 23-24; p. 32.5, Page. 26

Recommended status in the working register: "Prescribed by the Charter; actual formation and size are not confirmed."

F-004 Cooperative Investment and Infrastructure Development Fund (Cooperative Investment Fund)

Statutory statusDirectly provided for by the Charter; a special status trust fund.
Sources of fundingEarmarked contributions cooperative members; specific arrangements, allowable assets and ratios should be set out in separate regulations and contracts.
PurposeComprehensive development of market and other infrastructure of direct interaction between the consumer and the producer, development of investment activity of the consumer, including the creation of consumer ownership of the means of production.
Solutions and managementArticle 1 links the creation with the provisions and treaties approved by the Council. Paragraph 25.3 requires approval by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Council. Safe organizational model: the provision is approved by the General Assembly, the Council implements it and approves specific transactions within the competence.
Limitations and controlsWe need an investment policy, a list of permitted instruments, concentration and liquidity limits, asset valuation, conflict of interest, property storage and reporting on results.
Regime in liquidationSpecial procedure is not separately established; the regime of the cooperative’s property, contracts and decisions by which the fund is formed is applied.
Key ambiguityThe name “Investment Fund” should not give the impression of having the status of a regulated investment fund; the legal qualification of transactions is determined by their actual content.
Basis under the Charterp. 1, page 3; item 25.2-25.3, page 24

Recommended status in the working register: "Prescribed by the Charter; actual formation and size are not confirmed."

F-005 Contingency fund

Statutory statusDirectly provided by the Charter; internal provision for loss coverage.
Sources of fundingNo special source is named. Income after mandatory payments can be sent to the cooperative funds under item 26.1. The lack of a provision for losses is compensated by additional contributions of full members by decision of the General Meeting.
PurposeCoverage of expenses and losses from extraordinary circumstances; coverage of the formed losses of the Cooperative after approval of the annual balance sheet.
Solutions and managementThe procedure for the formation and use is established by the Charter and the provision approved by the General Assembly upon the proposal of the Council. Losses must be covered within three months of the approval of the annual balance sheet.
Limitations and controlsTarget and minimum sizes, list of covered events, limits of use, recovery procedures and prohibition of spending on normal operating purposes without a special solution should be established.
Regime in liquidationThere is no separate regime; the balance is taken into account in the general property of the Cooperative after the performance of obligations.
Key ambiguityThe statute does not establish a standard of deductions and sufficiency; without a provision, it is impossible to verify whether a reserve is actually formed and sufficient.
Basis under the CharterArt. 1, Page. 3; PT. 25.2-25.3, 26.1, 27.3, Page. 24-25

Recommended status in the working register: "Prescribed by the Charter; actual formation and size are not confirmed."

F-006 Insurance Fund

Statutory statusDirectly provided for by the Charter; internal fund for covering the risks of the cooperative.
Sources of fundingStatutes are not defined; they must be established by the statute and budget of the fund.
PurposeInsurance of various risks related to the activities of the Cooperative.
Solutions and managementFormation and use are regulated by the Charter and a separate provision approved by the General Assembly on the proposal of the Council.
Limitations and controlsIt is necessary to determine objects and events, the method of risk assessment, limits, exceptions, the procedure for deciding on payment, recipients and restoration of the fund.
Regime in liquidationNo separate regime has been established; outstanding obligations and balances should be considered in the light of treaties and the general modalities of liquidation.
Key ambiguityThe Internal Insurance Fund itself does not grant the Cooperative the right to licensed insurance activities.
Basis under the Charterp. 1, page 3; item 25.2-25.3, page 24

Recommended status in the working register: "Prescribed by the Charter; actual formation and size are not confirmed."

F-007 Guarantee and guarantee fund

Statutory statusDirectly included in the list of funds is article 25.2; special liability fund.
Sources of fundingThe statute is not separately disclosed. Paragraph 23.2 singled out the relationship within the fund as an exception to the general regime of non-reimbursable earmarked contributions.
PurposeEnsuring the guarantee and guarantee obligations of the Cooperative and/or its members within a separate provision and contracts.
Solutions and managementThe size, procedure of formation and use shall be established by the provision approved by the General Assembly on the proposal of the Council. Each obligation requires a separate decision and consideration of contingent risk.
Limitations and controlsBeneficiary criteria, limits per participant and total portfolio, collateral, term, regress, probability of performance and provision for issued obligations are required.
Regime in liquidationIn liquidation, first of all, the existing guarantees, guarantees and requirements of creditors are taken into account; a separate statutory procedure is not established.
Key ambiguityWithout a special provision, it is impossible to determine the amount of direct financial obligations and the adequacy of the fund.
Basis under the Charterp. 23.2, p. 23; p. 25.2-25.3, p. 24

Recommended status in the working register: "Prescribed by the Charter; actual formation and size are not confirmed."

F-008 Mutual Assistance Fund of Cooperative Members

Statutory statusDirectly included in the list of funds of article 25.2; internal social and financial fund.
Sources of fundingThe charter is not defined; it must be fixed by the decision and regulation of the fund.
PurposeMutual assistance to the members of the cooperative. Specific forms of assistance by the Charter are not disclosed.
Solutions and managementThe Regulations shall be approved by the General Meeting upon submission by the Council. In the situation it is necessary to distinguish between non-refundable assistance, return aid, interest-free loans and other forms of support.
Limitations and controlsIt is necessary to determine the range of recipients, the grounds of need, limits, repayment, terms, documents, conflict of interest and the procedure for controlling the intended use.
Regime in liquidationNo separate regime has been established; obligations to recipients and balances are reviewed according to the fund documents and the general liquidation procedure.
Key ambiguityFunctionally, it intersects with the material support fund, but the Charter uses different names; it is impossible to combine them without a separate solution.
Basis under the Charterp. 25.2-25.3, p. 24; the purposes of mutual assistance are also reflected in art. 3, p. 6-8

Recommended status in the working register: "Prescribed by the Charter; actual formation and size are not confirmed."

4. Supplementary funds and fund structures

F-009 Fund for Material Support of Cooperative Members

Classification: Additional defined fund

Status: Defined in article 1 and designated as the purpose of the activity but not separately listed in paragraph 25.2.

Description: Targeted contributions of members aimed at material support of participants of the target mutual associations - projects of the Cooperative. In practice, it should be established as a “other fund” by a decision of the General Assembly and a separate provision.

Reason: st. 1, Page. 4; p. 3.2, Page. 6; PT. 25.2-25.3, Page. 24

F-010 Trust Reserve Fund (type)

Classification: Possible future fund

Status: Mentioned in the permissive list of the types of own development funds; as a separate fund not established by Article 25.2.

Description: The wording of the Charter is given as “earmarked reserve” without separate regulation. The creation requires a decision of the General Meeting, an official name and a position that eliminates the intersection with the backup and target project outlines.

Base: item 3.3, page 8; item 25.2-25.3, page 24

F-011 Cumulative fund (type)

Classification: Possible future fund

Status: Permitted as an activity but not established by direct listing of Article 25.2.

Description: The Charter does not define the purposes, sources, conditions of accumulation and payment. It can be established as a different fund only after approval by the General Assembly of a separate provision.

Base: item 3.3, page 8; item 25.2-25.3, page 24

F-012 Pension Fund (internal type)

Classification: Possible future fund

Status: Mentioned among possible own development funds; actual creation is not supported by the Charter.

Description: It is necessary to distinguish the internal property contour from a separately regulated non-state pension fund.

Reason: p. 3.3, Page. 8

F-999 Other funds by decision of the General Meeting

Classification: Open Statutory Category

Status: The Charter allows the creation of additional funds by decision of the General Meeting.

Description: Each new fund should receive a separate code, decision on creation, regulation, budget, accounting and control rules; the record of F-999 serves only as a framework category, and not as a balance holder.

Base: item 5.2, page 11; item 25.2-25.3, page 24

UM-001 Real member's share fund

Classification: Accounting and management mechanism

Status: It is not an independent cooperative fund.

Description: The share of the development fund transferred to the management of the actual member and accounted for in the internal unit/account. Associate members have current accounts and depo accounts, but do not form a share fund and do not participate in the management of the development fund.

Reason: st. 1, Page. 4; p. 9.1, Page. 13; p. 12.3, Page. 16; PT. 24.2-24.7, Page. 23-24; p. 32.5, Page. 26

PR-001 Project for the creation of a non-state pension fund

Classification: Program Objective / Separate Legal Outline

Status: The Charter provides for the purpose of creating an NPF, but does not confirm the existence of an existing fund.

Description: The wording refers to a future project for cooperative members and staff. Implementation requires a separate organizational, legal and regulatory model; the entry in the Charter NPK itself does not create the NPF.

Reason: p. 3.2, Page. 7

5. Decision-making, accounting and control bodies

ContourFunctionBasis
General MeetingThe Supreme Authority. Approves regulations on funds on the recommendation of the Council; determines the amount and procedure for contributions; decides on other funds.item 13.2; item 21.1, item 25.2-25.3
the Cooperative CouncilPresents regulations to the General Assembly, approves the budget, controls the Board; appoints a trustee of the accounting system in cases stipulated by the Charter.p. 17.6; p. 22.4-22.5
Management BoardConducts current business activities, prepares proposals and is responsible for its results.item 17.15-17.19
The Audit CommissionSupervises financial and business activities; verifies the annual report and balance sheet; the report is reviewed by the General Meeting.item 13.5; item 18; item 28.2
AccountingThe Board and the Board are responsible for the reliability of the annual report and balance sheet. Funds, projects, contributions and transactions should be kept under items 29-30.item 28.1; item 29-30

6. Minimum set of documents for each fund

№DocumentWhat should be fixed
1Decision on establishment or confirmation of the fundMinutes of the General Meeting; if necessary, prior decision of the Council and submission of the Council.
2Regulations of the FundAppointment, sources, size, replenishment, allowable assets, expenses, repayment, bodies, limits, reporting and liquidation.
3Budget and financial planTarget and minimum balance, income, expenditure, liabilities, reserve and deficit scenario.
4Accounting registersSeparate analytics on the fund, contributor, project, repayment, asset, contract and document-base.
5Administrative documentsResponsible persons, limits of signing, procedure for coordination of operations, conflict of interest.
6Reporting and monitoringPeriodic report, reconciliation with accounting, conclusion of the Audit Commission, corrective measures.

7. Key control issues

Distinction of property: Who owns the asset, on whose balance sheet it is held, is it transferred to management and to which fund or project does it belong?

Contribution and Refund: Is the receipt of a unit, target unit, RCC, a return or non-return target contribution; what are the conditions for return?

Competence of the body: Is there a proper decision of the General Meeting and representation of the Council; has not the administrator gone beyond the limit?

Target use: Does the expenditure match the purpose of the fund, the regulation, the budget and the underlying document?

Non-monetary assets: Is there an independent or approved monetary valuation, act of transfer, ownership, and place of storage?

Risks of liabilities: Are the guarantees, sureties, insurance events, reserves and possible requirements of creditors taken into account?

Reconciliation and reporting: Does the register coincide with accounting analytics, bank statements, project accounts and report as of the reference date?

Liquidation regime: Are the undivided fund, development fund property, creditor claims and residual property separated?

8. Map of main statutory grounds

BasisContents
Article 1, page 3-4Definitions of unit, reserve, insurance, indivisible, development fund, investment fund, material support fund and share fund.
Paragraph 3.2, page 6-7The purpose of the creation of a material support fund and the NPF project.
Paragraph 3.3, page 8-9Permissible types of own development funds; industrial fund as a production property context.
Article 20, page 22Cooperative property and sources of its formation; special status of development fund property.
Articles 21-24, page 22-24Contributions, internal accounts, development fund, target shares, mutual funds and returns.
Article 25, page 24cooperative share fund and a direct list of other funds; a uniform rule for approval of regulations.
Articles 26-30, page 24-25Distribution of income, loss coverage, accounting records, control and storage of documents.
Article 32, page 26The regime of the indivisible fund, development fund and residual property upon liquidation.

Other published edition: Cooperative Funds Funds_NPK_NGO_SPEZZAZITA.pptx · web text +

Statutory register, structural separation and documentary control system

fixed assets

under article 25

The Charter expressly provides for 8 fixed assets

Key conclusion

Item 25.1 separately forms cooperative share fund. Item 25.2 lists seven more funds. But the Charter itself does not confirm their actual formation, size, or remainder.

REGISTER STATUS

Main

Funds

The Charter

Actual creation and amount - only after verification of the decision, position, accounting and reporting.

3 — property core

4 - Investment and risk protection

1 - mutual assistance

Three funds form the property core

F-001

F-002

Share Fund

Indivisible Fund

Cooperative's warehouse capital: mutual and other property contributions of members; base for reflection of units.

Share of property not distributed among members. The procedure of formation and use requires a separate solution.

F-003

MONITORING POINT

Development Fund

The status of the development fund is ambiguous

The charter describes it as part of cooperative share fund, a property in management and property with special status. We need a single accounting model.

Funds cooperative projects and programs; associated with it are target shares and share funds of full members.

Four Funds Share Investment and Risk

F-004

F-005

Investment

Standby

Investment and infrastructure development; the direction of investment should be fixed by the provision.

Coverage of losses and unforeseen expenses; need a limit and order of recovery.

F-006

F-007

Insurance

Warranty and guarantee

Financing of insurance protection and related expenses without automatic status of the insurer.

Guarantees and sureties; risk limits, securing and monitoring obligations are needed.

Mutual aid and material support - different designs

They cannot be automatically combined: the statutory basis and level of certainty differ.

F-008 •

F-009 • ADDITIONAL

Mutual Fund for Members

Material Support Fund

Directly included in the list p. 25.2. Appointment is the mutual support of members on conditions that must be fixed by a separate provision.

Status: provided by the Charter.

It is defined in Article 1 and is mentioned for purposes, but is not included in the list of items 25.2. If used, it should be separately formed as a "other fund".

Status: requires a decision by the General Meeting.

Share fund — a mechanism for accounting for shares, not a separate general fund

STEP 1

STEP 2

STEP 3

Development Fund

Project / Program

Member's Share Fund

F-003 accumulates property and finances approved projects and programs.

Trust funds are allocated and accounted for within a specific project.

Share of the development fund transferred to the management of the full member and reflected in the share/account.

Associate members use current and deposit accounts; this is not a mutual fund.

Fund management distributed among four bodies

General Meeting

the Cooperative Council

Approves regulations on funds, size and procedure of formation/use; makes key decisions.

Submits draft regulations, approves the budget, controls the Board; may appoint a trustee.

Management Board

The Audit Commission

Performs decisions, conducts current operations, organizes contracts, payments and primary accounting.

Checks financial and economic activity, reporting and compliance with the approved rules.

The current registry must be confirmed with 6 packages of documents

Decision

Position

Budget

Establishing a fund, determining the date and responsibility

sources, targets, limits, permitted operations

plan of income, expenditure and fund balances

Accounting

Implementation

Monitoring

accounts, analytics, primary documents and reconciliations

orders, contracts, payments and powers

reporting, audits, decisions on deviations

At the start of the registry critical four ambiguities

Status of the development fund

Competence of bodies

Simultaneously part cooperative share fund, property in management and object with special status.

Formulations about indivisible and investment funds require a single route of decisions.

Limits of protective funds

Regulated names

Reserve, insurance and warranty circuits must have different events, limits and accounting.

The words "investment", "insurance" and "pension" do not themselves create a license or a special status.

Risk reduction: approve individual provisions and a unified model of analytical accounting before conducting operations.

The next step is to document each fund

STAGE 1

STAGE 2

STAGE 3

Inventory

Normative fixation

Running the registry

Collect decisions, provisions, balances, treaties and responsible f-001F-009.

Close the gaps: approve regulations, limits, accounts and coordination routes.

Make amounts and documents, appoint data owners, set quarterly reconciliations.

Result: for each fund, the basis, status, owner, size, balance and supporting documents are visible.

Sources cited in presentation 19

  • Charter NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" — title page; page 25, page 24.
  • [/Sources]
  • Charter NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" - p. 25.1–25.3, p. 24.
  • CHARTER NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" Definitions "cooperative share fund“Indivisible Fund”, “Development Fund”, Art. 1, Page. 3–4.
  • CHARTER NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITAthe “ Art of the Year. 20–23, Page. 22–23; PT. 25.1–25.3, Page. 24.
  • Charter NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" - definitions of investment, reserve, insurance and guarantee funds, Art. 1, p. 3–4.
  • Charter NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" — p. 25.2, p. 24.
  • NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" — definitions of mutual assistance fund and material support fund, Art. 1, p. 4.
  • CHARTER NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITAthe “ P ”. 3.2, Page. 6; PT. 25.2–25.3, Page. 24.
  • Statute NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" - definition of "pay-fund", "pay-account", "current account", "deposit account", p. 1, p. 3–4.
  • CHARTER NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITAthe “ P ”. 20.4 and Art. 22–24, Page. 22–24.
  • Charter NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITA" — competence of the General Assembly and Council, sections on governing bodies, p. 13–20.
  • CHARTER NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITAthe “ P ”. 25.3, Page. 24; Art. 29–30, Page. 25.
  • CHARTER NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITAthe “ P ”. 25.3, Page. 24; Art. 26–30, Page. 24–25.
  • The conclusion about the set of supporting documents is made analytically from the requirements of the Charter to decisions, regulations, accounting, reporting and control.
  • CHARTER NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITAthe “ Art of the Year. 1, Page. 3–4; p. 3.3, Page. 8–9; p. 20.4, Page. 22; Art. 22–25, Page. 22–24.
  • The differences highlighted were the result of a comparison of the provisions of the Charter.
  • CHARTER NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITAthe “ P ”. 25.3, Page. 24; Art. 26–30, Page. 24–25; Art. 32, Page. 26.
  • The proposed procedure for the implementation of the register is a practical recommendation on the basis of the Charter.

Published files

Finance · Full published text

The Individual as a Centre of Monetary Issuance and a Bank

Source Status: Primary Document

The concept of a new financial system in which value and responsibility are associated with the human being.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/chelovek-emissionnyi-tsentr-i-bank

Open on the site

Status of the document: conceptual model for design and piloting. The formula “man is the issuing center and bank” is interpreted here not as the right of an individual to issue a state currency, but as a principle: a person is the primary source of labor, knowledge, trust, obligations and created value; the financial system should be able to take into account, confirm and direct this value.

1. Main thesis

The new financial system shifts the center of gravity from impersonal cash flow to the individual as a carrier of abilities, time, knowledge, reputation, rights, assets and responsibilities. Money in such a system remains a means of calculation, but the management core is a personal Living Balance linking value creation, commitment, investment, social impact, and long-term sustainability.

2. The Seven Principles of the New System

1. Man is the primary source of value. Work, knowledge, creativity, entrepreneurship, care, social trust and results of intellectual activity are recorded as flows of value created by a person.

2. Personal balance instead of "bank account". A person has not only a cash balance, but also a structured balance: assets, obligations, competencies, rights, projects, insurance and social reserves.

3. Issue as a confirmed claim right. Within the project and cooperation contours, digital accounting units/rights of claim may be created for a confirmed result, asset, contract or future flow. They do not replace legal tender.

4. Connectivity. Each unit of value is related to the source, purpose, project, person, term, risk, and outcome.

5. A living balance. The balance is updated as events unfold, not just once in the reporting period; the dynamics of human health, project, organization, territory and the entire system are visible.

6. Double contour: personal and public. The growth of personal capital is compared with the social, natural and intellectual effect.

7. Trust through evidence. Reputation is based on confirmed actions, verified results and compliance with obligations, and not on declarations.

3. Architecture: man as a "personal financial node"

ContourWhat countsWhat createsWhat Gets
Personal capitaltime, work, health, competence, reputationResult of work and servicesincome, rights, reserves
Intellectual Capitalknowledge, RID/OIC, authorshiplicenses, technologies, methodsroyalty, share, investment
Project capitalrole, contribution, contract, riskmeasurable project resultResult share/reward
Social capitaltrust, cooperation, social contributionNetwork and collective effectaccess to cooperation and resources
Natural contourpersonal/project environmental footprintRecovery/SavingEnvironmental Credit/Effect Rating

4. Personal Live Balance

Personal Living Balance (PLB) is a digital passport of the financial and economic condition of a person. It does not replace accounting or banking reporting, but is a meta-level that collects proven data from authorized sources.

  • Assets: money, property, shares, shares, claims, intellectual rights.
  • Potential: competencies, qualifications, confirmed experience, available time.
  • Flows: income, expenses, investments, social transfers, project payments.
  • Liabilities: loans, contractual obligations, taxes, alimony, guarantees, and sureties - where applicable.
  • Reserves: insurance, pension, educational, medical, family.
  • Effects: created jobs, public benefit, environmental and cultural contribution.
  • Risks: concentration of income, debt load, time gaps, dependence on one source.

5. What does it mean "man - emission center"

In the project model, EG emission is understood as the issue of a confirmed digital right to future or already created value. It is possible only if there is a reason and should not be mixed with the issue of state currency.

Base → Verification → Limit → Digital Right → Execution → Maturity/conversion

TypeBasisLimitImplementationProtection
Unit of workconfirmed contract/orderVolume and Betwork acceptedescrow/act
Project unitPercentage of Project Resultbudget/phaseMilestonethe Deposit Register
Intellectual unitRight to RID/LicenseEstimated FlowRoyalties/licensingthe Register of Rights
The cooperative unitShares/contributions to cooperationa participant's contributiondistribution of the resultCooperative rules
Social Credit EffectVerified public resultMethodology of the programtargeted bonus/benefitindependent verification

6. What does it mean "bank"

The phrase describes functional autonomy, not a banking license. A person receives an interface that combines typical functions of the personal treasury:

  • storage and marking of own assets;
  • personal budget and plan;
  • management of reserves and risks;
  • participation in investment and cooperation projects;
  • invoice/claim for the created result;
  • management of RID/OIC rights;
  • control of the debt load and the term of obligations;
  • Personal Analytics and Forecasting.

7. The EH Balance Hierarchy

Personal balance becomes the lowest level of the overall architecture:

1. Man is a personal Living Balance

2. Family / Household

3. Project / Enterprise / Cooperative

4. Municipality / Territory

5. Region

6. State

7. Planetary Balance

8. Balance of Biosphere

8. Transaction code of the new system

For connectivity, an extended TX code is offered, in which the subject, source of value, purpose and effect are fixed:

TX:EG-PID-YYYYMMDD-VAL-Sxx-Dxx-PRJ-KIN-VER

  • PID - Participant ID (pseudonymized in the public layer).
  • VAL — Type of value created: LAB / INT / NAT / SOC / CAP.
  • Sxx/Dxx is the semantic code and direction.
  • PRJ - project or contract.
  • KIN is a rhythmic label if used in a planning loop.
  • VER — mark/level of verification.

9. Financial architecture of EG

1. Personal Treasury: Personal Balance and Rights

2. Cooperative layer: resource and project pools

3. Investment layer: capital, RID, shares, long-term instruments

4. Payment layer: banks, payment organizations and legal means of payment

5. Meta-register: connections of subjects, projects, assets, codes and results

6. Live Balance: Operational Analytics

7. ESR: decisions and limits

8. SPECZASHCHITA: legal, financial, cyber and ethical controls

10. Restrictors and protection

  • No unsecured “personal emission”: digital law arises only on a verifiable basis.
  • Full separation of the internal unit of account from the state currency and bank deposit.
  • Negative Hidden Balance Ban: Risks and liabilities are reflected symmetrically to assets.
  • Limits on the release of claims rights are determined by the quality of the security, the period and the history of execution.
  • Conflict of interest, fraud, double-secured use of one asset are blocked by the Metareister.
  • The person controls the permissions for the use of personal data; the public layer receives only the necessary minimum.
  • Decisions AI are advisory where human rights are affected unless otherwise provided by law and by a process of due diligence.

11. Pilot "Man is a financial knot"

StageTimeframeResultThe criterion of success
1. Model0–2 monthsPZHB, value classifiers, rules of claim rightsLegally and methodologically consistent model
2. MVP2–4 monthspersonal treasury, project register, TX codes100–500 users, full audit trail
3. Cooperative Pilot4–8 months3–5 projects, calculation of deposits and resultwithout double counting and disputed rights
4. Live Balance6–10 monthsHuman Analytics → Project → TerritoriesMonthly and Event Balance
5. Scaling10–18 monthsIntegration with the Meta-Registrar/ECDCAPI and verification

12. Formula of the system

MAN → VALUES → PROOF → LAW → EXCHANG → BALANCE → DEVELOPMENT

The key point: the new financial system does not make a person a “printer”. It makes it visible to the economy as a full-fledged medium of value creation and transforms financial accounting from the fixation of money into the management of value, responsibility and development.

Published files

Analytics · Full published text

Weaknesses of Countries and Regions

Source Status: Primary Document

System map of vulnerabilities of the modern world

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/slabye-storony-stran-i-regionov

Open on the site

RUSSIA

EUROPE

CHINA

USA

ARAB WORLD

AFRICA

Objective: to identify not the “weak”, but the points where systemic solutions and international cooperation are possible.

Russia

The potential is great, but the key gap is between the country’s resources and the speed of their transformation into a result.

Demography

Technological dependence

Population ageing; staff shortages; weakening of small towns and peripheral areas.

Microelectronics, machine tools, industrial software, scientific equipment, part of pharmaceuticals.

The gap "science → market"

Bureaucratic inertia

Strong schools and development do not always reach the industrial scale and export product.

Long coordination, cautious decisions and weak horizontal cooperation between the contours.

Regional asymmetry

Long-term capital and management

Overconcentration of capital, personnel and opportunities in several major centers.

Lack of affordable funding for innovation and teams capable of running cross-industry programs.

The gap between capacity and its systemic implementation.

KEY VALIDITY

Europe

The main risk is to maintain a high standard of living, but gradually lose strategic subjectivity.

Demography

Energy and industry

Low fertility, ageing, worker shortages and a growing strain on the social model.

High cost of energy and pressure on energy-intensive industries, the risk of transfer of production.

Regulatory complexity

Digital dependency

Multi-level compromises by the EU increase the time frame for reforms and reactions to technological shifts.

Lack of own global cloud, platform and AI-ecosystems of global scale.

Security

Political fragmentation

Dependence of part of the European defence and intelligence architecture on transatlantic capabilities.

Different interests of countries, migration disputes and the complexity of forming a single long-term strategy.

The risk of turning from a power center to a strong but dependent market and regulator.

KEY VALIDITY

China

A strong industrial system is entering a complex transition: from extensive growth to a mature innovation model.

Demographic turnaround

Real Estate and Debt

Ageing, decline in the number of employees and the growth of social burden on the economy.

Accumulated imbalances of the construction model, debts of developers and regional structures.

Dependence on exports

Technological bottlenecks

High sensitivity to global trade, external demand and geopolitical constraints.

Advanced lithography, part of semiconductor and scientific equipment remain critical points.

Energy and Maritime Logistics

Centralization of decisions

Large imports of raw materials and dependence on the stability of external transport corridors.

The vertical accelerates mobilization, but increases the cost of strategic error and the risk of distorted feedback.

Transition from a “world factory” to a self-sufficient innovation center without losing pace.

KEY VALIDITY

USA

The main internal vulnerability is the growing tension between global power and the internal connectivity of society.

Polarization

Fiscal load

A strong political and cultural divide reduces the ability to build long-term consensus.

High government debt and deficits increase reliance on the dollar and the Treasury market.

Industrial Chains

Social Inequality

Some of the production competencies and critical supplies have long been outside the country.

The gap between territories and population groups undermines trust in institutions and social mobility.

Infrastructure

Global overvoltage

A number of sectors have accumulated significant deterioration in transport, utilities and urban infrastructure.

Maintaining a broad network of alliances and commitments is expensive and requires a constant reallocation of resources.

The risk of internal disintegration while maintaining external leadership.

KEY VALIDITY

Arab countries

The region has capital and resources, but the key transition is from rent to the knowledge and competence economy.

Raw material model

Technological dependence

For some countries, oil and gas revenues remain the basis of the budget, employment and investment cycle.

A high share of imported technologies, equipment and experts in critical sectors.

Water and climate

Regional fragmentation

Fresh water scarcity, extreme heat, desertification and the high cost of sustainable water supply.

Different centers of power, conflicts of interest and weak coordination of a single long-term agenda.

Youth labour market

Security and Industry

The need to create millions of skilled jobs and sustainable social lifts.

Dependence on external defense technologies and limited own complex industrial base.

Conversion of resource capital into human, technological and institutional capital.

KEY VALIDITY

Africa

The main task is to turn rapid demographic and resource growth into their own production chains.

Institutions

Infrastructure deficit

Uneven quality of public administration, corruption risks and poor predictability of rules in some countries.

The lack of transport, energy, water, logistics and digital connectivity constrains the single market.

Commodity dependence

Energy poverty

Exports of primary resources are often not accompanied by recycling and value creation within countries.

Limited access to stable electricity inhibits production, education, medicine and digitalization.

Demography and employment

Climate and safety

Young people are an advantage only in the rapid creation of education, jobs and urban infrastructure.

Droughts, land degradation, local conflicts and instability increase migration and humanitarian risks.

Lack of capacity to transform resources and demographics into a sustainable economic system.

KEY VALIDITY

Comparative Vulnerability Map

The same problems manifest themselves differently - depending on the stage of development and the structure of the economy.

Russia

Europe

China

USA

The Arab World

Africa

Demography

HIGH

HIGH

HIGH

LOW

MEDIUM

LOW

Technology

HIGH

MEDIUM

MEDIUM

LOW

HIGH

HIGH

Energy / Resources

LOW

HIGH

MEDIUM

MEDIUM

MEDIUM

HIGH

Institutes / Management

HIGH

MEDIUM

MEDIUM

MEDIUM

MEDIUM

HIGH

Inequality / Regions

HIGH

MEDIUM

MEDIUM

HIGH

MEDIUM

HIGH

Geopolitics / Security

MEDIUM

MEDIUM

HIGH

MEDIUM

HIGH

HIGH

The scale shows the relative importance of vulnerability within a particular region, rather than a comparison of "who is worse".

Common problems of all countries

Behind the differences hides a single set of systemic challenges of world civilization.

Crisis of Meaning

Demography

There is no convincing general image of the future.

Aging or youth overheating without a sufficient number of opportunities.

The technological gap

Concentration of capital

AI and automation are developing faster than institutions, education and law.

Data, money and platforms are concentrated in a limited number of centers.

Crisis of confidence

Ecology and resources

Confidence in institutions, elites, media and international mechanisms is declining.

Water, climate, soils, biodiversity and waste are becoming a safety issue.

Debt and inequality

Management crisis

Rising debt and a gap in opportunities make systems less resilient.

The speed of change is higher than the speed of interagency and international decisions.

The complexity of the world is growing faster than the ability of states to coordinate people, technology, capital, and nature.

From weaknesses to collaborative decision architecture

Common vulnerabilities create space not only for competition, but also for substantive international cooperation.

EQUILIBRIUM

SFERA

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

Monitoring and forecasting

A common space of initiatives

Mobilization of resources and projects

Enforcement cooperation

Principle: not to create one "world model", but to build a compatible contour - data → initiative → resource → execution → measurable result.

HUMANITY

ENVIRONMENT

ENERGY

SCIENCE

PRODUCTION

GOVERNANCE

Published files

Finance · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM Evolutionary Financial System

Source Status: Primary Document

The document explains EQUILIBRIUM’s proposed financial system.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/evolyutsionnaya-finansovaya-sistema-ekvilibrium

Open on the site

TETTA + matrix 13×20 + Smart Money

2026

1. Appointment of EFS

The EFS is a project-based financial architecture within EQUILIBRIUM. Its mission is to link public and private resources with development goals, concrete projects, measurable results and continuous feedback. In the TETTA model, it acts as an analytical and scenario core, and the EFS - the contour of the movement and control of financial flows.

2. Conceptual basis

The downloaded material formulates three basic laws - Savings, Attraction and Synthesis - and considers the development of systems as a cyclical process, where elements are connected by relations, flows and feedback. For the EFS, this is used as a conceptual framework, not as a statement about modern economic science.

  • Savings Law → Resource efficiency and minimization of losses.
  • The Law of Attraction → cooperation, contractual relations, demand, capital and stable relations between the participants.
  • The Synthesis Act → aligns individual financial decisions with the goals of the system as a whole.
  • The law of periodicity → cycles of planning, execution, control, reassessment and relaunch.
  • The Law of Conformity → is a unified logic of analysis on different scales: project, municipality, region, industry, country.

Source-Foundation: User PDF "Is there an analogy", sections on basic postulates, the Law of Periodicity, the Laws of Thought and the development of consciousness. The rest of the EFS architecture below is design development and system interpretation.

3. What the EFS changes

Purpose: from the financing of an item/activities to the financing of a measurable result.

Route: from weakening control after enumeration to pre-known program rules and acceptable operations.

Data: from periodic reporting to event and aggregate telemetry of execution.

Control: from checking the fact of spending - to checking the flow, result and effect.

Solution: from mainly manual adjustment to scenario recommendations of TETTA while maintaining the responsibility of the authorized person.

Scale: from disparate programs to a single matrix 13×20.

4. EFS Architecture

SourcesTETTARulesEFSImplementationResultFeedback

Flow: status data → Diagnostics → priority → Passport of financial flow → Operations → Measurable result → comparison "plan/fact/effect" → adjustment.

4.1. Five cores

1. Data Core - receiving, cleaning, cataloging and versioning data; a single model of object identifiers, programs and results.

2. 13×20 Engine - diagnostics of the state of 13 Stages and 20 search for gaps between objectives, resources, flows, performance and outcome.

3. Meaning & Policy Core — checking compliance with the strategy, budget restrictions, program rules, participant rights and public goals.

4. Decision Core — distribution scenarios, prediction of consequences, stress tests and ranking options. The solution is not delegated to the model automatically.

5. Feedback Core — control of results, effects and side effects; update risk ratings and recommendations.

5. Passport of "smart money"

In the EFS, “smartness” refers not to the monetary unit itself, but to the digital rule of the program that accompanies the allocated resource. For the pilot, it is preferable to create a new currency or public token.

Flow ID: Unique program/tranche/commitment ID

Source: budget, fund, bank, investor, cooperative, enterprise

Goal: What result should be achieved

Matrix 13×20: a cell or set of cells to which the stream refers

Recipients: permissible categories of subjects

Operations: Permitted and Prohibited Uses

Duration: validity period and control points

KPI/Outcome: Measurable Results and Effect

Evidence: contract, act, registry, sensor, payment fact, external validation

Risk profile: limits, flags, anomalies, conflict of interest

Return/transfer rules: what happens when conditions are not met

Audit: Unchanged log of decisions and actions

6. EFS Matrix 13×20

Matrix 13×20 contains 260 management cells. The vertical describes the life cycle of the solution, the horizontal describes the spheres of manifestation. Financial flow can be tied to one or more cells and should not be considered separately from the result.

6.1. 13 stages

  1. Source/Baseline: The financial question of stage 1 is what needs to be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  2. Idea: The financial question of stage 2 is what should be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  3. Meaning: The financial question of stage 3 is what should be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  4. Objective: The financial question of stage 4 is what needs to be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  5. Intention: The financial question of stage 5 is what should be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  6. Diagnosis: financial question stage 6 - what should be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  7. Plan: The financial question of stage 7 — what needs to be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  8. Resource: financial question of stage 8 - what should be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  9. Flow: The financial question of stage 9 - what should be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  10. Structure: The financial question of stage 10 — what needs to be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  11. Stage 11 - What should be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  12. The result: a financial question of stage 12 — what needs to be determined, measured or verified before moving on.
  13. Financial question stage 13 - what should be determined, measured or verified before moving on.

6.2. 20 spheres

1. Man2. Health3. Family4. Community5. Education
6. Science7. Technology8. Economy9. Finance10. Work
11. Management12. Territories13. Infrastructure14. Ecology15. Nature
16. Energy17. Culture18. Information19. Security20. Future/Space

6.3. Example of reading a cell

7. Logic of decision making

  1. Signal: a fact, rejection, request or risk forecast is received.
  2. Context: the object is associated with the program, territory, industry and cells 13×20.
  3. Diagnosis: The system looks for cause and related dependencies.
  4. Scenarios: at least three options are calculated - basic, accelerated and protective.
  5. Assessment of restrictions: law, budget, liquidity, security, data, rights of citizens and organizations.
  6. Solution: The authorized body or person chooses the option; AI does not receive an unconditional right to dispose of public funds.
  7. Execution: a flow passport and control events are formed.
  8. Feedback: compares costs, result, effect and side effects.
  9. Update: Rules, forecasts and subsequent tranches are adjusted.

8. Example of application: support for productive SMEs

The pilot scenario does not require its own currency. It can be implemented as a targeted program with a digital financing passport, control of permissible operations and result analytics.

ElementPilot
Issue addressedBusinesses have orders, but are running a working capital deficit and long-term funding coordination.
Goalto accelerate capital turnover without weakening control.
Resourceline of credit/guarantee fund/interest rate subsidy.
Rulespermitted categories of payments: raw materials, equipment, logistics, payroll, mandatory payments.
MonitoringNot the content of every private purchase by the state, but automatic checks of program conditions, limits and anomalies.
Resultgrowth of output, execution of contracts, employment, tax base, absence of delay.
Feedbackchange of limits, terms and conditions of the next tranche based on the actual result.

9. Governance: Who controls what?

RoleResponsibility
Strategic customerApproves objectives, limitations and outcome indicators.
Program OwnerIt is responsible for the budget, rules and the achievement of results.
TETTAanalyzes data, builds scenarios, identifies deviations and forms recommendations.
EFSComplies with the digital rules of the financial route and keeps a log of events.
Treasury/Bank/Payment Operatorconducts legally significant calculations within the framework of the current regulation.
Person carrying out the workIt creates resources and creates results.
Validator/auditorConfirms the evidence and independent evaluation of the result.
Citizen/businessobtains clear rights, grounds for decisions and channels of appeal.

10. Legal and ethical restrictions

  • The EFS should not turn ordinary citizens’ money into a programmable means of total control.
  • Targeted restrictions apply only to voluntary or normatively defined software where the rules are known in advance.
  • Personal data is minimized; for analytics, aggregated and pseudonymized sets are preferred.
  • Any significant automated restriction must have a legal basis, explanation and appeal procedure.
  • Models AI provide guidance and signals of risk, but should not alone make irreversible decisions about rights, access to funds or sanctions.
  • The public algorithms of the program are subject to audit, version journaling and conflict of interest control.

11. Technological architecture

Integration layer: API Gateway, event bus, connectors to registers, banks, ERP and Treasury Systems.

Data: lakehouse/warehouse, master data, data catalog, lineage, quality control.

Graph of links: graph database for participants, contracts, objects, projects, obligations and dependencies.

Rules: policy/rules engine for permitted operations, limits, roles and control points.

Analytics: streaming analytics, scenario modeling, ML for anomalies and predictions.

Register of events: immutable audit log; blockchain is possible only where there is a real need for inter-organizational consensus.

Interface: EQUILIBRIUM: a flow map, a 13×20 matrix, a programme card, scenarios, risks and evidence.

Security: Zero Trust, RBAC/ABAC, hardware keys, access log, segmentation and backup.

12. Financial Flow Index EQUILIBRIUM

For MVP, you can use the index 0–100, which does not claim macroeconomic truth, but serves as a management signal. It is calculated from standardized indicators and necessarily reveals the structure of the assessment.

ComponentWeightExample of measurement
Target compliance15%percentage of transactions and results corresponding to the stream passport
Speed of passage15%time from approval to useful use of the resource
Flow cost10%Transactional and administrative costs
Performance25%the ratio of the actual result to the target
Resilience15%Ability to maintain results after funding ends
Risk and Evidence10%quality of confirmations, share of anomalies, violations
Feedback10%speed of deviation detection and adjustment

13. MVP EFS: 120 days

PeriodResult
0–30 daysselection of one program; data model; stream passport; 20–30 KPI; rights and roles; prototype 13×20.
31–60 daysintegration of 2–3 sources; an event log; rules for permitted operations; the first EQUILIBRIUM screen.
61–90 daysanomaly analysis; TETTA scenarios; proof outline; pilot on a limited group of participants.
91–120 daysimpact assessment; independent audit; rule adjustment; scaling decision.

14. Scaling readiness criteria

  • at least 90% financial events are associated with the passport of the program and the final result;
  • the main deviations are detected faster than the current control procedure;
  • the administrative cost of control is reduced without loss of evidence;
  • participants understand the rules and can appeal against erroneous restrictions;
  • independent audit confirms the correctness of the data and the log of decisions;
  • the effect of the pilot is stable and does not create unacceptable side effects;
  • The architecture can be scaled without centralizing unnecessary personal data.

15. Final model

Outline Formula:Target → RESOURCES → RULE → FLOW → ACTION → RESULTS → PROOF → CORRECTION

Annex. Minimum set of data

ProgrammeProjectGoalIndicator
Source of fundingTrancheRecipientContract
OperationResult objectEvidenceRisk
DecisionControl EventAuditorMatrix 13×20

Published files

  • EFS_EQUILIBRIUM.docx (DOCX)
    https://speczashchita.com/documents/knowledge/evolyutsionnaya-finansovaya-sistema-ekvilibrium/source-01.docx

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Culture and heritage

Documents about culture, heritage, historical memory and development models based on values. The package brings together texts from one thematic section without replacing the originals with editorial summaries.

Materials: 6 · with full text: 6 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Culture · Full published text

Book of Kins: Archive for Preserving Humanity’s Heritage

Source Status: Primary Document

The concept of an evidential archive that preserves the origin, context, rights, versions and connections of cultural and intellectual heritage objects.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/kniga-kinov-arkhiv-naslediya-chelovechestva

Open on the site

Concept: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Moscow · Editorial Board 1.0 · 30 August 2026

01 APPOINTMENT

Passport and System Status

FieldContents
Name“Book of Kins. An Archive for Preserving the Heritage of Humanity”
Author of the conceptSokolov Sergey Leonidovich
Statusstrategic concept and technical assignment for a pre-project pilot
PurposeLink Meaningful Navigation 13×20 with a trusted long-term archive
Main audiencegovernment bodies, archives, academic environment, museums, libraries, media communities, technology partners
System OutlineEQUILIBRIUM — analytics; Ledger — accounting; Archive — provenance and versions; ECO-PPA — results and responsibility
UnitsKIN001-KIN260; heritage site; performance; event; agent; law; conservation package
Hourly ProfilesUTC - machine storage; MSK - legal and management fixation; TX - symbolic kin-stamp on the approved correlation profile

02 MISSION

Why Humans Need a Evidence-Based Archive

Heritage is not lost only when the carrier is destroyed. It disappears with the loss of context, language, origin, rights, connections between versions and the ability of the future community to discover the object and understand its meaning.

ThreatMechanism of lossSystem response
Physicalfire, water, conflict, degradation of the carrierdistributed copies, insurance funds, disaster recovery plan
Digitalbit damage, format obsolescence, platform dependencychecksums, migrations, emulation, open formats
Smyslovaobject is separated from language, place, people and historycontextual connections, oral evidence, versions of interpretations
Legalunclear rights, withdrawal of consent, access modesregister of rights, terms, consents and restrictions
EvidentiaryIt is not known who created or changed the recording.W3C PROV, event log, signature and integrity fixation
AlgorithmicAI creates a plausible but unconfirmed reconstructionSeparation of source, derivative and hypothesis

Source: UNESCO Memory of the World

03 BORDER

Two Layers: Meaning and Proof

The Book of Kins answers the question “What function does a record perform within the development cycle?” The Archive answers the question “What evidence confirms provenance, integrity, rights and the history of changes?” The two layers are linked by identifiers, but neither replaces the other.

LayerWhat keepsWhat he does not claim
Smyslovay KINarchetype, tone, wave, cycle question, connection with the Planhistorical truth, authorship or legal status of the object
The Evidence Archivemedium, metadata, origin, events, rights, fixation of integrityThe only acceptable cultural interpretation
Interpretationsscientific, cultural, educational and author's versionsEquality of interpretation of the source
Managementdecisions, powers, KPI, risks, auditautomatic right to modify culturally sensitive materials

04 CYCLE LANGUAGE

Matrix 13×20 and registry 260 Kins

KIN = ARCHETIP × TON CYCLA. For the number k from 1 to 260 The archetype is defined as (k−1) mod 20)+1, tone — ((k−1) mod 13)+1, wave — floor(k−1)/13)+1, position in the wave - (k−1) mod 13)+1.

MeasurementNumberFunction
Archetypes20Meaning of an object or event
Tones13stage of goal setting, organization, verification and transfer
Keena260Unique combination of archetype and tone
Waves20 × 13Executable cycles; each wave contains 13 consecutive kines
Time ProfileUTC + MSK + TXdoes not mix machine, legal and symbolic time

Source: Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian: Tzolk’in

Source: Foundation for the Law of Time: 13

05 ARCHETIES

Twenty Archetypes as Memory Functions

№ArchetypeFunctionArchival issue
01DragonEastWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
02WindTransmissionwhat message, language or certificate should be kept
03NightcapacityWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
04SeedDesignwhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
05SerpentViabilityWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
06Bridge of WorldsCommunicationwhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
07Handimplementationwhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
08StarHarmonywhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
09LunaPurificationwhat is purified and what needs to be restored
10DogLoyaltyTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
11MonkeyGameWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
12PersonSelectionWho decides and how free will is ensured
13Sky WandererStudyWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
14MagicianattentionHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
15EagleVisionWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
16WarriorquestionWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
17LandSynchronizationIt is related to place, time and natural context.
18MirrorDifferencesWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
19StormconversionWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
20SunIntegrityWhat is the final meaning available to humanity

An archetype is not assigned to a person as an immutable characteristic. In the archival model, it describes the role of a record, event, or decision in a particular cycle.

06 CYCLES

Thirteen tones as a management cycle

№TonePhaseOperation
01MagneticObjectiveFormulate the object of preservation
02LunarCallIdentify polarity, threat and limitation
03ElectricMinistrydetermine the useful function and owner of the action
04Self-SubsistingFormset structure, boundaries and metadata
05OverturningAuthorityassign responsibility and resources
06RhythmicOrganizationbalance processes and periodicity
07ResonanceSetupopen a channel of observation and feedback
08GalacticaIntegritycheck compliance with values and rules
09SolarIntentFocus on measurable effect
10PlanetarymanifestationGet a verifiable result
11SpectralReleaseremove unnecessary connections and close the outdated
12CrystallinecooperationConducting a collective examination
13Spacepresencecomplete the cycle and pass on to the next

07 OBJECTS

What exactly does the Archive

Heritage ClassExamplesSpecial requirements
Documentarymanuscripts, maps, drawings, correspondence, registersorigin, fund structure, rights, high-precision digitization
Audiovisualphoto, sound, cinema, oral historysource stream, technical metadata, transcription, consent
IntangibleLanguages, rituals, practices, knowledge of naturemedia participation, access levels, right of withdrawal or restriction
Scientific and technicaldata, instruments, algorithms, RID/OIC/R & Dmethodology, software version, runtime, reproducibility
Naturalbiocenoses, landscapes, genetic and environmental observationsgeoreference, seasonality, data ethics, security regime
Architectural and substantivebuildings, monuments, artifacts, samples3D/geometry, condition, restoration interventions
Digitally Bornsites, models, digital art, social mediadependencies, platform rights, emulation, interface context

Source: UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage

08 METADAN

Information model of the heritage object

The minimum archive unit is not a file, but a related object with representations, events, agents, rights, and evidence. One cultural object may have a physical original, master file, derivative copies, translation, transcription, 3D model, and multiple interpretations.

EntityRequired fieldsContact
HeritageObjectID, name, type, description, culture/place/period, sensitivitythe Meaning Center
Representationformat, size, codec, profile, checksum, mediaspecific digital or physical form
Eventtype, time UTC/MSK, agent, tool, result, logcreation, reception, verification, migration, access
Agentperson/organization/system, role, authority, identifierwho created, confirmed, modified or granted access
Rightscopyright holder, basis, license, term, prohibitions, consentWhat is allowed and to whom
Provenancesource, chain of ownership, reference to predecessor, versionWhy Records Can Be Trusted
KinContextKIN-ID, archetype, tone, wave, purpose, justificationauthor's semantic navigation

Source: PREMIS Data Dictionary 3.0

09 TECHNOLOGY

Architecture OAIS: from reception to access

ContourArchive FunctionInformation package
Manufacturertransmits material, rights, context and list of filesSIP — receipt package
Appointmentsantivirus, format validation, integrity fixation, quarantineAcceptance protocol
Archival storagereplication, control, recovery, migrationAIP — save package
Data managementmetadata, indexes, identifiers, linksCatalog and graph of origin
Conservation planningformat risks, migration and emulation strategiesConservation Plan
Administrationpolicies, roles, audits, suppliers, risksSolutions and Magazines
Usersearch, order, issuance, explanation of restrictionsDIP — access package

Source: ISO 14721:2025 — OAIS

10 PROCESS

Receive and Save Conveyor

  1. Preliminary assessment of value, risk, rights and cultural sensitivity.
  2. Transfer agreement: composition, liability, access mode, permissible actions.
  3. Formation SIP: Manifest, structure, checksums, descriptive and technical metadata.
  4. Quarantine and technical inspection without changing the source material.
  5. Identification and validation of formats; fixing deviations.
  6. Expert verification of origin, authorship, date and context.
  7. Creation AIP: immutable original, metadata PREMIS/PROV, law, event log.
  8. Replication in at least three independent failure domains; one copy is off-site.
  9. Periodic integrity check, recovery test, monitoring of format risks.
  10. Formation of DIP taking into account the rights, audit of issuance and explicit marking of derivative versions.

11 TRUST

Origin, authenticity and versions

StatusPermissible wordingMinimum proof
Primary Source"received directly from..."transfer act, agent identification, checksum
Certified copy"copy checked with..."reconciliation procedure, expert, date, protocol
Derivative version"created from the version... by the method..."link to source, tool, parameters, log
Reconstruction"hypothetical reconstruction"set of sources, assumptions, author, level of confidence
AI-result"synthetic material"model/version, inputs, prompt/method, verification, prohibition of source substitution
Controversial attribution"Attribution not confirmed / versions available"List of arguments and alternative conclusions

Source: W3C PROV-O

12 ACCESS

Rights, ethics and cultural sovereignty

Openness does not mean unconditional publication. The archive is obliged to support copyright holders, personal data, secrecy, restrictions of the carrier communities and the risk of harm. For sensitive materials, the principle of “access by reasoned role and purpose” applies.

LevelWho is availableExamples
A - OpenAllpublic descriptions, open copies, educational materials
B - RegistrationIdentified Usersresearch copies with terms of use
C - ExpertAccredited specialistsunpublished funds, limited risk data
D - CommunityCarriers and Authorized Representativessacred, ritual, local knowledge
E - Closedstrictly by the decision of the owner/lawpersonal, secret, dangerous or controversial materials

13 CONSERVATION

Fixing integrity and saving formats

MonitoringBasic levelTarget level
Copies2 copies on different media3+ copies in independent failure domains
IntegrityCheck amount upon admissionregular automatic inspection + deviation investigation
Formatsextension identification and MIMEsignature, profile, validator, migration/emulation strategy
AccessHand Magazinerole, purpose, decision, issuance and review in a single audit
RecoveryBackupRegularly tested recovery scenario
Ecologystorage volume accountingEnergy and carbon conservation budget

Source: NDSA Levels of Digital Preservation 2.1

14 INTEGRATION

Connection with EQUILIBRIUM and the Ledger

SystemRoleWhat goes into the archive
EQUILIBRIUMobservation, analysis, forecast, controlmodels, input data, versions, solutions and quality assessment
Ledgeraccounting for resources, liabilities, RID/OIC/R & D and effectswiring, grounds, evaluation, connection to the object and event
Book of KinsMeaningful Navigation 13×20KIN-stamp, archetype, tone, wave and cycle question
ECO-PPAfixation of the result, terms, resources, KPI, risks and responsibilitycontract versions, proof of performance, verification
SPECZASHCHITACo-operative execution and pilotspassports of works, acts, laboratory data, photos/videos and results
MURDE / FundsLegal and resource contourrights, sources of funding, restrictions and reporting

15 3×13×19

Architecture 741 as a map of responsibility

Architecture 741 Not competing with the registry 260. She arranges the management of the archive to 3 Planes × 13 Stages × 19 Industry Outlines: 741 the Verified Cell of Responsibility.

Flatness13 stages19 contours
Heritagefrom identification and reception to transmission to the next generationscience, culture, education, nature, industry and other industries
Evidencefrom source and fixation to audit and reassessmentuniform requirements for origin, format, rights and quality
Actionfrom goal and risk to result and cycle closureECO-PPA, performers, verifiers, funds and management bodies

Unit 741 must have owner, regulatory basis, inputs, outputs, KPI, risks, period of control and reference to archival evidence.

16 INSTITUTES

Management and independent verification

OrganCredentialsLimitation
Archive Boardstrategy, selection policy, budget, appointment of managementdoes not replace scientific or cultural expertise
Scientific and Expert Councilmethods, attribution, quality and reproducibilityFixes uncertainty, not eliminates it by voting
The Council of Media Communitiesconsent, cultural protocols, access levelsDoes not extend authority beyond the representation
Conservation Servicereception, AIP, replication, migration, recoverydoes not change the source without a recorded event
Access Servicecatalog, delivery, educational productsdoes not waive rights and restrictions for the sake of coverage
Independent Auditorassessment of power of attorney, risks and control proceduresorganizationally separated from the executor
Ethical Commissionerpersonal data, sensitive materials, AI and harmhave the right to suspend publication

Source: ISO 16363:2025 — trustworthy digital repositories

17 SUSTAINABILITY

Threat model and special protection

ThreatBarrierProof of readiness
Loss of sitegeographically dispersed copiessuccessful recovery outside the main site
Compromise AccountMFA, minimum privileges, division of dutiesaccess log and regular revision of rights
Encryptorimmutable/offline copy, segmentationthe Remedial Control Exercise
Quiet damagechecksums and periodic fixation of integrityVerification report and correction chain
Change of Originsignature, W3C PROV, double examinationLinked Graph of Sources and Events
Supplier Monopolyopen formats, export and documentationVerified exit plan
Inappropriate publicationlevels of access, consent, DLP and recallAccess Solution and Issue Log
Climatic/energy riskenergy budget, cold storage, site selectionSustainability plan and consumption metrics

18 MEASUREMENT

KPI and maturity model

ContourIndicatorPurposeful meaning
SecurityAIP share with proven integrity100% Trust Fund
RecoveryRPO/RTO and percentage of successful testsProven, not declared, readiness
OriginPercentage of objects with full source graphThe visible chain of trust
RightsPercentage of issuances with a machine-verifiable basisZero unauthorized publication
AvailabilityPercentage of materials available to target communitiesaccess without breaking restrictions
Formative riskPercentage of objects with approved conservation strategyManaged migration and emulation
Meaningful Connectivitypercentage of objects with a valid KIN-contextsearch by cycle function without substituting evidence
Eco-friendlykW·h and emissions per TB-years of storageLong-term sustainability of infrastructure

19 STARTING

90-day pilot

PeriodWorkResult of admission
Days 1–15mandate, fund audit, selection of 3 collections, rights and risksPilot's passport and restriction register
Days 16–30metadata schema, identifiers, SIP/AIP/DIP, rolesApproved profile and test packages
Days 31–50receiving 100–300 objects, checksums, provenancequarantine passed, events recorded
Days 51–65replication, backup, recovery test, format analysisRecovery Protocol and Migration Plan
Days 66–78KIN- markup, search, access levels, community participationcatalog and proven access scenarios
Days 79–90independent verification, KPI, economic model, solutionreport and scaling decision

20 MASSTABING

Road map for three years

HorizonResultTransition criterion
0–3 monthspilot and basic profile of trusted storagerecovery proven, rights and provenance filled
3–12 monthsCentral node + 3–5 partner institutionscompatible exchange SIP/AIP/DIP and single identifier register
12–24 monthsFederal network of industry archives and communitiesinternode replication, independent audit, access directories
24–36 monthsInternational Outline and Heritage Programmejoint collections, multilingual access, sustainable financing

The decision to scale is made not by the number of downloaded files, but by the ability to prove the safety, origin, rights, reparability and benefits for the designated communities.

21 TECHNICAL PROFILE

Passport KIN-records

GroupFieldRequirement
IdentificationKIN_ID, Object_ID, Version_IDuniqueness, immutability, ID resolution
TimeUTC, MSK, TXUTC is always stored; MSK - with managerial significance; TX - only by approved correlation
Meaningarchetype, tone, wave, role, justificationAppointed by a person/expert, history of changes remains
Originsource, wasDerivedFrom, agent, activitycompatible with W3C PROV
Securityformat, size, checksum, location, eventcompatible with PREMIS and conservation plan
Rightsholder, basis, licence, access, expiry, consentaccess solution is calculated from the current version
Qualitystatus, confidence, reviewer, dateseparates fact, attribution, hypothesis and synthetic material
Connectivityparent/child, collection, place, language, subjectsupports graph and multi-language navigation

22 20 VOLN × 13 STEPS

Full register KIN001 ?KIN260

A deterministic register of combinations is provided below. The names and functions are used as the author’s operational semantics for the “Book of Kins”. Assignment to a specific object must have a written justification and does not affect the evidence-based assessment.

VOLNA 01 · DRAGON

KIN001–KIN013

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN00101 Magnetic01 DragonFormulate the object of preservationWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN00202 Lunar02 WindIdentify polarity, threat and limitationwhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN00303 Electric03 Nightdetermine the useful function and owner of the actionWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN00404 Self04 Seedset structure, boundaries and metadatawhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN00505 Rotary05 Snakeassign responsibility and resourcesWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN00606 Rhythmic06 Bridge of Worldsbalance processes and periodicitywhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN00707 Resonance07 Handopen a channel of observation and feedbackwhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN00808 Galactic08 Starcheck compliance with values and ruleswhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN00909 Sunny09 MoonFocus on measurable effectwhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN01010 Planetary10 DogGet a verifiable resultTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN01111 Spectral11 Monkeyremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN01212 Crystal12 PersonConducting a collective examinationWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN01313 Space13 Celestial wanderercomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?

Wave Focus: What should be born, accepted, and provided with a resource. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 02 · WIND

KIN014–KIN026

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN01401 Magnetic14 WizardFormulate the object of preservationHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN01502 Lunar15 EagleIdentify polarity, threat and limitationWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN01603 Electric16 Warriordetermine the useful function and owner of the actionWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN01704 Self17 Landset structure, boundaries and metadataIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN01805 Rotary18 Mirrorassign responsibility and resourcesWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN01906 Rhythmic19 Stormbalance processes and periodicityWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN02007 Resonance20 Sunopen a channel of observation and feedbackWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN02108 Galactic01 Dragoncheck compliance with values and rulesWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN02209 Sunny02 WindFocus on measurable effectwhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN02310 Planetary03 NightGet a verifiable resultWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN02411 Spectral04 Seedremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedwhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN02512 Crystal05 SnakeConducting a collective examinationWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN02613 Space06 Bridge of Worldscomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextwhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems

Wave Focus: What message, language, or evidence should be stored. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 03 · NIGHT

KIN027–KIN039

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN02701 Magnetic07 HandFormulate the object of preservationwhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN02802 Lunar08 StarIdentify polarity, threat and limitationwhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN02903 Electric09 Moondetermine the useful function and owner of the actionwhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN03004 Self10 Dogset structure, boundaries and metadataTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN03105 Rotary11 Monkeyassign responsibility and resourcesWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN03206 Rhythmic12 Personbalance processes and periodicityWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN03307 Resonance13 Celestial wandereropen a channel of observation and feedbackWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN03408 Galactic14 Wizardcheck compliance with values and rulesHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN03509 Sunny15 EagleFocus on measurable effectWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN03610 Planetary16 WarriorGet a verifiable resultWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN03711 Spectral17 Landremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN03812 Crystal18 MirrorConducting a collective examinationWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN03913 Space19 Stormcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?

The focus of the wave: what hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 04 · FAMILY

KIN040–KIN052

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN04001 Magnetic20 SunFormulate the object of preservationWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN04102 Lunar01 DragonIdentify polarity, threat and limitationWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN04203 Electric02 Winddetermine the useful function and owner of the actionwhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN04304 Self03 Nightset structure, boundaries and metadataWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN04405 Rotary04 Seedassign responsibility and resourceswhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN04506 Rhythmic05 Snakebalance processes and periodicityWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN04607 Resonance06 Bridge of Worldsopen a channel of observation and feedbackwhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN04708 Galactic07 Handcheck compliance with values and ruleswhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN04809 Sunny08 StarFocus on measurable effectwhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN04910 Planetary09 MoonGet a verifiable resultwhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN05011 Spectral10 Dogremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN05112 Crystal11 MonkeyConducting a collective examinationWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN05213 Space12 Personcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextWho decides and how free will is ensured

Wave focus: what growth code and maturity criteria are fixed. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 05 · Serpent

KIN053–KIN065

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN05301 Magnetic13 Celestial wandererFormulate the object of preservationWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN05402 Lunar14 WizardIdentify polarity, threat and limitationHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN05503 Electric15 Eagledetermine the useful function and owner of the actionWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN05604 Self16 Warriorset structure, boundaries and metadataWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN05705 Rotary17 Landassign responsibility and resourcesIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN05806 Rhythmic18 Mirrorbalance processes and periodicityWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN05907 Resonance19 Stormopen a channel of observation and feedbackWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN06008 Galactic20 Suncheck compliance with values and rulesWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN06109 Sunny01 DragonFocus on measurable effectWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN06210 Planetary02 WindGet a verifiable resultwhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN06311 Spectral03 Nightremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN06412 Crystal04 SeedConducting a collective examinationwhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN06513 Space05 Snakecomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary

Wave focus: what conditions of viability and safety are necessary. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 06 · Bridge of the Worlds

KIN066–KIN078

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN06601 Magnetic06 Bridge of WorldsFormulate the object of preservationwhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN06702 Lunar07 HandIdentify polarity, threat and limitationwhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN06803 Electric08 Stardetermine the useful function and owner of the actionwhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN06904 Self09 Moonset structure, boundaries and metadatawhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN07005 Rotary10 Dogassign responsibility and resourcesTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN07106 Rhythmic11 Monkeybalance processes and periodicityWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN07207 Resonance12 Personopen a channel of observation and feedbackWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN07308 Galactic13 Celestial wanderercheck compliance with values and rulesWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN07409 Sunny14 WizardFocus on measurable effectHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN07510 Planetary15 EagleGet a verifiable resultWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN07611 Spectral16 Warriorremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN07712 Crystal17 LandConducting a collective examinationIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN07813 Space18 Mirrorcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated

Wave focus: what is translated between eras, cultures and systems. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 07 · HAND

KIN079–KIN091

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN07901 Magnetic19 StormFormulate the object of preservationWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN08002 Lunar20 SunIdentify polarity, threat and limitationWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN08103 Electric01 Dragondetermine the useful function and owner of the actionWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN08204 Self02 Windset structure, boundaries and metadatawhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN08305 Rotary03 Nightassign responsibility and resourcesWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN08406 Rhythmic04 Seedbalance processes and periodicitywhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN08507 Resonance05 Snakeopen a channel of observation and feedbackWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN08608 Galactic06 Bridge of Worldscheck compliance with values and ruleswhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN08709 Sunny07 HandFocus on measurable effectwhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN08810 Planetary08 StarGet a verifiable resultwhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN08911 Spectral09 Moonremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedwhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN09012 Crystal10 DogConducting a collective examinationTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN09113 Space11 Monkeycomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable

The focus of the wave: what action, skill or healing is confirmed. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 08 · STAR

KIN092–KIN104

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN09201 Magnetic12 PersonFormulate the object of preservationWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN09302 Lunar13 Celestial wandererIdentify polarity, threat and limitationWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN09403 Electric14 Wizarddetermine the useful function and owner of the actionHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN09504 Self15 Eagleset structure, boundaries and metadataWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN09605 Rotary16 Warriorassign responsibility and resourcesWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN09706 Rhythmic17 Landbalance processes and periodicityIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN09807 Resonance18 Mirroropen a channel of observation and feedbackWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN09908 Galactic19 Stormcheck compliance with values and rulesWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN10009 Sunny20 SunFocus on measurable effectWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN10110 Planetary01 DragonGet a verifiable resultWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN10211 Spectral02 Windremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedwhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN10312 Crystal03 NightConducting a collective examinationWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN10413 Space04 Seedcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextwhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed

The Wave Focus: What Quality, Measure, and Cultural Form Are Achieved. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 09 · LUNA

KIN105–KIN117

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN10501 Magnetic05 SnakeFormulate the object of preservationWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN10602 Lunar06 Bridge of WorldsIdentify polarity, threat and limitationwhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN10703 Electric07 Handdetermine the useful function and owner of the actionwhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN10804 Self08 Starset structure, boundaries and metadatawhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN10905 Rotary09 Moonassign responsibility and resourceswhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN11006 Rhythmic10 Dogbalance processes and periodicityTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN11107 Resonance11 Monkeyopen a channel of observation and feedbackWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN11208 Galactic12 Personcheck compliance with values and rulesWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN11309 Sunny13 Celestial wandererFocus on measurable effectWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN11410 Planetary14 WizardGet a verifiable resultHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN11511 Spectral15 Eagleremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN11612 Crystal16 WarriorConducting a collective examinationWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN11713 Space17 Landcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextIt is related to place, time and natural context.

Wave focus: what flow is purified and what needs to be restored. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 10 · DOG

KIN118–KIN130

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN11801 Magnetic18 MirrorFormulate the object of preservationWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN11902 Lunar19 StormIdentify polarity, threat and limitationWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN12003 Electric20 Sundetermine the useful function and owner of the actionWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN12104 Self01 Dragonset structure, boundaries and metadataWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN12205 Rotary02 Windassign responsibility and resourceswhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN12306 Rhythmic03 Nightbalance processes and periodicityWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN12407 Resonance04 Seedopen a channel of observation and feedbackwhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN12508 Galactic05 Snakecheck compliance with values and rulesWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN12609 Sunny06 Bridge of WorldsFocus on measurable effectwhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN12710 Planetary07 HandGet a verifiable resultwhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN12811 Spectral08 Starremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedwhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN12912 Crystal09 MoonConducting a collective examinationwhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN13013 Space10 Dogcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve

The focus of the wave: to whom and what values the heritage object serves. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 11 · OBJECTIVE

KIN131–KIN143

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN13101 Magnetic11 MonkeyFormulate the object of preservationWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN13202 Lunar12 PersonIdentify polarity, threat and limitationWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN13303 Electric13 Celestial wandererdetermine the useful function and owner of the actionWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN13404 Self14 Wizardset structure, boundaries and metadataHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN13505 Rotary15 Eagleassign responsibility and resourcesWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN13606 Rhythmic16 Warriorbalance processes and periodicityWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN13707 Resonance17 Landopen a channel of observation and feedbackIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN13808 Galactic18 Mirrorcheck compliance with values and rulesWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN13909 Sunny19 StormFocus on measurable effectWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN14010 Planetary20 SunGet a verifiable resultWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN14111 Spectral01 Dragonremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN14212 Crystal02 WindConducting a collective examinationwhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN14313 Space03 Nightcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed

Wave Focus: Which new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 12 · MAN

KIN144–KIN156

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN14401 Magnetic04 SeedFormulate the object of preservationwhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN14502 Lunar05 SnakeIdentify polarity, threat and limitationWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN14603 Electric06 Bridge of Worldsdetermine the useful function and owner of the actionwhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN14704 Self07 Handset structure, boundaries and metadatawhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN14805 Rotary08 Starassign responsibility and resourceswhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN14906 Rhythmic09 Moonbalance processes and periodicitywhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN15007 Resonance10 Dogopen a channel of observation and feedbackTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN15108 Galactic11 Monkeycheck compliance with values and rulesWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN15209 Sunny12 PersonFocus on measurable effectWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN15310 Planetary13 Celestial wandererGet a verifiable resultWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN15411 Spectral14 Wizardremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN15512 Crystal15 EagleConducting a collective examinationWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN15613 Space16 Warriorcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed

The focus of the wave: who makes the decision and how free will is ensured. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 13 · HEAVENLY PAGE

KIN157–KIN169

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN15701 Magnetic17 LandFormulate the object of preservationIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN15802 Lunar18 MirrorIdentify polarity, threat and limitationWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN15903 Electric19 Stormdetermine the useful function and owner of the actionWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN16004 Self20 Sunset structure, boundaries and metadataWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN16105 Rotary01 Dragonassign responsibility and resourcesWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN16206 Rhythmic02 Windbalance processes and periodicitywhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN16307 Resonance03 Nightopen a channel of observation and feedbackWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN16408 Galactic04 Seedcheck compliance with values and ruleswhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN16509 Sunny05 SnakeFocus on measurable effectWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN16610 Planetary06 Bridge of WorldsGet a verifiable resultwhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN16711 Spectral07 Handremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedwhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN16812 Crystal08 StarConducting a collective examinationwhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN16913 Space09 Mooncomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextwhat is purified and what needs to be restored

Wave focus: what is the boundary of knowledge expanding. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 14 · VOLSHEBNIK

KIN170–KIN182

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN17001 Magnetic10 DogFormulate the object of preservationTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN17102 Lunar11 MonkeyIdentify polarity, threat and limitationWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN17203 Electric12 Persondetermine the useful function and owner of the actionWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN17304 Self13 Celestial wandererset structure, boundaries and metadataWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN17405 Rotary14 Wizardassign responsibility and resourcesHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN17506 Rhythmic15 Eaglebalance processes and periodicityWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN17607 Resonance16 Warrioropen a channel of observation and feedbackWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN17708 Galactic17 Landcheck compliance with values and rulesIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN17809 Sunny18 MirrorFocus on measurable effectWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN17910 Planetary19 StormGet a verifiable resultWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN18011 Spectral20 Sunremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN18112 Crystal01 DragonConducting a collective examinationWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN18213 Space02 Windcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextwhat message, language or certificate should be kept

Wave focus: how the presence, quality, and ethics of observation are held. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 15 · ORYL

KIN183–KIN195

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN18301 Magnetic03 NightFormulate the object of preservationWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN18402 Lunar04 SeedIdentify polarity, threat and limitationwhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN18503 Electric05 Snakedetermine the useful function and owner of the actionWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN18604 Self06 Bridge of Worldsset structure, boundaries and metadatawhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN18705 Rotary07 Handassign responsibility and resourceswhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN18806 Rhythmic08 Starbalance processes and periodicitywhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN18907 Resonance09 Moonopen a channel of observation and feedbackwhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN19008 Galactic10 Dogcheck compliance with values and rulesTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN19109 Sunny11 MonkeyFocus on measurable effectWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN19210 Planetary12 PersonGet a verifiable resultWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN19311 Spectral13 Celestial wandererremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN19412 Crystal14 WizardConducting a collective examinationHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN19513 Space15 Eaglecomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up

The focus of the wave: what a holistic picture and long-term perspective open up. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 16 · WAR

KIN196–KIN208

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN19601 Magnetic16 WarriorFormulate the object of preservationWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN19702 Lunar17 LandIdentify polarity, threat and limitationIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN19803 Electric18 Mirrordetermine the useful function and owner of the actionWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN19904 Self19 Stormset structure, boundaries and metadataWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN20005 Rotary20 Sunassign responsibility and resourcesWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN20106 Rhythmic01 Dragonbalance processes and periodicityWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN20207 Resonance02 Windopen a channel of observation and feedbackwhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN20308 Galactic03 Nightcheck compliance with values and rulesWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN20409 Sunny04 SeedFocus on measurable effectwhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN20510 Planetary05 SnakeGet a verifiable resultWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN20611 Spectral06 Bridge of Worldsremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedwhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN20712 Crystal07 HandConducting a collective examinationwhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN20813 Space08 Starcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextwhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved

The focus of the wave: what statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 17 · EARTH

KIN209–KIN221

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN20901 Magnetic09 MoonFormulate the object of preservationwhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN21002 Lunar10 DogIdentify polarity, threat and limitationTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN21103 Electric11 Monkeydetermine the useful function and owner of the actionWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN21204 Self12 Personset structure, boundaries and metadataWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN21305 Rotary13 Celestial wandererassign responsibility and resourcesWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN21406 Rhythmic14 Wizardbalance processes and periodicityHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN21507 Resonance15 Eagleopen a channel of observation and feedbackWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN21608 Galactic16 Warriorcheck compliance with values and rulesWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN21709 Sunny17 LandFocus on measurable effectIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN21810 Planetary18 MirrorGet a verifiable resultWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN21911 Spectral19 Stormremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN22012 Crystal20 SunConducting a collective examinationWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN22113 Space01 Dragoncomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource

The focus of the wave: how the object is related to the place, time and natural context. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 18 · MIRROR

KIN222–KIN234

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN22201 Magnetic02 WindFormulate the object of preservationwhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN22302 Lunar03 NightIdentify polarity, threat and limitationWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN22403 Electric04 Seeddetermine the useful function and owner of the actionwhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN22504 Self05 Snakeset structure, boundaries and metadataWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN22605 Rotary06 Bridge of Worldsassign responsibility and resourceswhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN22706 Rhythmic07 Handbalance processes and periodicitywhat action, skill or healing is confirmed
KIN22807 Resonance08 Staropen a channel of observation and feedbackwhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN22908 Galactic09 Mooncheck compliance with values and ruleswhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN23009 Sunny10 DogFocus on measurable effectTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN23110 Planetary11 MonkeyGet a verifiable resultWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN23211 Spectral12 Personremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN23312 Crystal13 Celestial wandererConducting a collective examinationWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN23413 Space14 Wizardcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held

Wave focus: what boundaries, versions, and reflections need to be separated. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 19 · BURY

KIN235–KIN247

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN23501 Magnetic15 EagleFormulate the object of preservationWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN23602 Lunar16 WarriorIdentify polarity, threat and limitationWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN23703 Electric17 Landdetermine the useful function and owner of the actionIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN23804 Self18 Mirrorset structure, boundaries and metadataWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN23905 Rotary19 Stormassign responsibility and resourcesWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN24006 Rhythmic20 Sunbalance processes and periodicityWhat is the final meaning available to humanity
KIN24107 Resonance01 Dragonopen a channel of observation and feedbackWhat should be born, accepted and provided with a resource
KIN24208 Galactic02 Windcheck compliance with values and ruleswhat message, language or certificate should be kept
KIN24309 Sunny03 NightFocus on measurable effectWhat hidden knowledge or possibility is revealed
KIN24410 Planetary04 SeedGet a verifiable resultwhat growth code and maturity criterion is fixed
KIN24511 Spectral05 Snakeremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedWhat conditions of viability and safety are necessary
KIN24612 Crystal06 Bridge of WorldsConducting a collective examinationwhat is translated between eras, cultures and systems
KIN24713 Space07 Handcomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextwhat action, skill or healing is confirmed

The focus of the wave: what change has occurred and whether it can be reproduced. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

VOLNA 20 · SUN

KIN248–KIN260

KINToneArchetypeStep operationArchival issue
KIN24801 Magnetic08 StarFormulate the object of preservationwhat quality, measure and cultural form is achieved
KIN24902 Lunar09 MoonIdentify polarity, threat and limitationwhat is purified and what needs to be restored
KIN25003 Electric10 Dogdetermine the useful function and owner of the actionTo whom and what values does the heritage object serve
KIN25104 Self11 Monkeyset structure, boundaries and metadataWhat new scenario or creative interpretation is acceptable
KIN25205 Rotary12 Personassign responsibility and resourcesWho decides and how free will is ensured
KIN25306 Rhythmic13 Celestial wandererbalance processes and periodicityWhat frontier of knowledge is expanding?
KIN25407 Resonance14 Wizardopen a channel of observation and feedbackHow the Presence, Quality, and Ethics of Surveillance Are Held
KIN25508 Galactic15 Eaglecheck compliance with values and rulesWhat an integral picture and long-term perspective opens up
KIN25609 Sunny16 WarriorFocus on measurable effectWhat statement is checked and how uncertainty is removed
KIN25710 Planetary17 LandGet a verifiable resultIt is related to place, time and natural context.
KIN25811 Spectral18 Mirrorremove unnecessary connections and close the outdatedWhat boundaries, versions and reflections need to be separated
KIN25912 Crystal19 StormConducting a collective examinationWhat change has occurred and can it be replicated?
KIN26013 Space20 Suncomplete the cycle and pass on to the nextWhat is the final meaning available to humanity

Wave focus: what is the final meaning available to humanity. The end of the wave is recorded by the event of the transfer of the result, open questions and evidence to the next cycle.

23 CONTROL

The acceptance audit matrix

VerificationYes/NoEvidenceStop-condition
The ID is allowed and not re-used□the ID RegistryDuplication or ambiguity
Source is separated from derivative versions□Structure AIPRewriting the original
Control amount verified□PREMIS EventDisagreement without investigation
Origin is related to agents and actions□W3C PROVunknown source
Rights and consents are valid□Rights recordNo grounds for processing/issuance
Format identified and has a plan□format profileUnsupported critical format
Reserve restored in test□DR protocolThe copy exists only formally.
KIN-marking is justified and separated from the fact□KinContextSymbolic label replaces attribution
Community sensitivity and interests are taken into account□ethical decisionrisk of harm or violation of protocol

24 LINKS

Sources and normative support

The list records the external evidence base. The author’s terms EQUILIBRIUM, Ledger, ECO-PPA, Heritage Archive, architecture 741 and the operational semantics of Kins are not presented as standards of the organisations listed.

1. UNESCO Memory of the World - documentary heritage preservation, access and public awareness.

2. UNESCO Recommendation, 2015 - preservation and access to documentary heritage, including digital form.

3. ISO 14721:2025 (OAIS) — reference model of an open archive information system.

4. ISO 16363:2025 — audit and certification of trusted digital repositories.

5. PREMIS 3.0 — preservation metadata: objects, events, rights and agents.

6. W3C PROV-O - machine-readable origin of entities, actions and agents.

7. NDSA Levels 2.1 is a practical model of digital preservation maturity.

8. Smithsonian: Living Maya Time is a 260-day Tzolk'in as a combination of 20 days names and 13 numbers.

9. Foundation for the Law of Time - Dreamspell: A Modern Symbolic System 20 Seals × 13 Tone.

Outcome principle

The legacy is preserved not when the file is loaded once, but when the future person can find it, check the origin, understand the context, open it in a permissible way and pass on without losing meaning and trust.

Another published edition: Book of Kins Kniga_Kinov_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_Chelovechestva.pptx · web text +

Archive for the Preservation of the Heritage of Humanity

Meaning · origin · version · rights · access

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

concept 1.0 · 2026

The main risk is not to lose the file, but its meaning

WHY THE ARCHIVE IS NEEDED

VEHICLE

CONTACTS

Damage · obsolescence · no copies

It is not clear what the object means and why it is important.

ORIGIN

RIGHTS

no author, version, events and transmission chain

access is either permanently closed or opened without consent

PROJECT PRINCIPLE

each object must be found, checked, understood and correctly transmitted

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Two layers of one memory system

ARCHITECTURE OF SENSE AND EXPLANATORY

BOOK OF KINS

HERITAGE ARCHIVE

The semantic layer

Proof layer

20 Archetypes

13 tones cycle

260 Kin

Waves by 13

Communication and Interpretation

objects and versions

Sources and events

rights and restrictions

Integrity Control

Access and Transfer

Connects

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

260

COUNTING SYSTEM

KING = ARCHETIP × CYCLE TON

ARCHETIPOV

TONOVA

KINOV

20 Waves × 13 Positions

KIN001 … KIN260 · unique address in the semantic matrix

BORDER OF APPLICATION

Author's / Dreamspell-system of Kins does not replace the historical calendar traditions of the Maya and civil chronology

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

20 archetypes — alphabet of qualities

ARCHETICAL LAYER

Dragon

Wind

Night

Seed

Serpent

Connector

Hand

Star

Luna

Dog

Monkey

Person

Putnik

Magician

Eagle

Warrior

Land

Mirror

Storm

Sun

DESCRIPTION RULE

the archetype stores the name, definition, source, version and valid translation options

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

13 tones - process from design to transmission

CYCLE OF ACTION

Goal

Challenge

Ministry

Form

Power

Balance

Configure

Integrity

Intention

Manifestation

Release

Cooperation

Presence

Each tone is a function of the cycle, not a person’s evaluation

ARCHIVE NOTES

interpretation is separated from the primary source and provided with the date, author and scope of applicability

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

What exactly does the Archive

THE SEVEN CLASS OF OBJECTS

TEXTS

RCD

Manuscripts · Books · Letters

algorithms · environment · dependencies

SAMPLES

MATERIAL OBJECTS

photo · cards · schemes

3D · Passports · Status

SOUND AND VIDEO

LIVE KNOWLEDGE

Voice · rituals · testimonies

Practice · Media · Consent

NOT ALL SHOULD BE OPEN

DATA

Sacred, Personal and Vulnerable Knowledge Gets Managed Access Mode

Sets · Measurements · Models

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

OAIS: from receipt to trusted access

REFERENCE FLOW

SIP

INGEST

AIP

DIP

the Incoming Package

Verification · Description

Master Storage Package

the Issue Package

DATA MANAGEMENT

STORAGE PLANNING

ADMINISTRATION

Description · indexes · search

formats · migration · risks

Policy · Audit · Responsibility

PURPOSE

not a perpetual format, but a managed ability to store and provide information

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The minimum model of a trusted object

PREMIS + PROV

OBJECT

Presentation

EVENT

AGENCY

file · record

format · structure

created · verified

Author · system

RIGHTS

ORIGIN

KIN-CONTEXT

License ·

who · when · why

archetype · tone · links

IDENTITY

stable ID connects the object, its versions, events, rights and semantic context

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The ladder of trust does not mix fact and interpretation

CLASSIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT

PRIMARY

original or direct fixation

CERTIFIED

III

Verified copy/transcription

PRODUCTION

annotation · translation · analysis

RECONSTRUCTION

A clearly defined hypothesis

SYNTHETIC

AI / generation with full labeling

SPORIOUS

Conflicting versions remain

PROHIBITION

reconstruction and AI-material are not raised to the primary source by editorial decision

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Access is a matrix of rights, not an open button.

ETHICS AND RIGHTS

OPEN

Fast Route

View · citing · reuse

REGISTERED

Fast Route

access after agreeing to the terms and conditions

RESEARCH

Curator's Decision

Application · Purpose · Usage Log

LIMITED

Curator's Decision

Personal / Sensitive Data

EMBARGO / OPECUN

Curator's Decision

the decision of the community or the copyright holder

CONSENT

living and culturally sensitive knowledge is published only within the scope of this permission

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Ecosystem: meaning, calculation, experiment, protection

INTEGRATION CONTOUR

EQUILIBRIUM

Analytical Core

LEDGER

ECO-PPA

SPECZASHCHITA / MURDE

BOOK OF KINS

Operations and indicators

experiment and contract

Execution and verification

Meaningful Navigator

HERITAGE ARCHIVE

Versions and evidence

SECTION OF ROLES

the contractor does not confirm the result alone; the archive records the model, solution and verification

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

260

DO NOT MIX DIFFERENT SYSTEMS

260 - semantic matrix; 741 - control circuit

741

20 × 13

3 × 13 × 19

Kinov

archetype × tone

Waves of Interpretation

Check Outlines

Levels and Classes

author architecture

COMMUNICATIONS

Both systems can refer to a single object, but retain separate identifiers, rules, and versions.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Trust is measured by resilience and verifiability

SAFETY AND MEANINGFULNESS

3–2–1–1–0

100%

copies · carriers · off-site · offline · errors

AIP with checksums and event log

< 24 h

≥ 1×/year

Detection of integrity violation

Recovery test and selective access check

CONTROL

PROTECTION

MONITORING

SUSTAINABILITY

Inventory

copies and hashes

formats and risks

Migration and Audit

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

90 days: from mandate to pilot

START PLAN

1–15

16–30

31–50

51–70

71–90

MANDATE

INVENTORY

MODEL

PROTOTIP

VERIFICATION

Borders · Owner · Rights

objects · risks · priorities

ID · metadata · access classes

ingest · AIP · Search · DIP

recovery · audit · solution

Day solution package 90

Conservation Policy

Metadata Profile

pilot set AIP

matrix of rights

Recovery Report

Plan 3 years

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

To preserve means to provide the future with the opportunity to find, test, understand and pass on

HERITAGE ARCHIVE

The Book of Kins provides a coordinate of meaning.

The archive gives the coordinates of trust.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · 2026

Sources cited in presentation 9

  • https://www.unesco.org/en/memory-world
  • https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-concerning-preservation-and-access-documentary-heritage-including-digital-form
  • https://lawoftime.org/thirteenmoon/tutorial.html
  • https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
  • https://maya.nmai.si.edu/calendar/calendar-system
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/87471.html
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/87472.html
  • https://ndsa.org/publications/levels-of-digital-preservation/

Published files

Culture · Full published text

Russia: Heritage Preservation Archive and Soft Power

Source Status: Primary Document

Concept of the state system of preservation, validation, digitalization and international representation of cultural and historical heritage of Russia.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/rossiya-arkhiv-naslediya-myagkaya-sila

Open on the site

Key formula: Heritage = Memory × Source × Law × Data × Education × Trust × International influence

1. Purpose of system

• The heritage preservation archive is not just a repository of documents. It is a national infrastructure of memory, evidence, continuity and cultural diplomacy.

• The system should unite museum, archival, scientific, educational, regional, family and departmental funds into a single managed circuit.

• Soft power arises not from slogans, but from the proven depth of culture, the quality of knowledge, the availability of sources and the ability of Russia to offer meaning, education and cooperation to the world.

2. Architecture: From Funds to Influence

ContourContentsToolsResult
FundsManuscripts, documents, photos, movies, audio, objects, scientific dataInventory, certification, restorationPreserved Memory
ValidationAuthenticity, Origin, Rights, Versions, ContextExamination, PROV-chains, source registersTrust in materials
Digital ArchiveDigitization, metadata, long-term storageOAIS, PREMIS, reservation, APIAccess and preservation
EducationSchools, universities, mentoring, cultural coursesPortals, training modules, expeditionsTransfer of heritage
Soft powerCultural diplomacy, international projects, language policyExhibitions, exchanges, media, translation programsHumanitarian impact

3. Main modules of the Archive

• 1. Unified Heritage Register: catalogue of funds, objects, collections, personalities, events, places and rights.

• 2. Source passport: origin, owner, state, copyright holder, digital copies, level of trust.

• 3. Validation Center: historical, scientific, legal, linguistic and technical expertise.

• 4. Digital storage: archival master copies, custom copies, backup outlines, and integrity control.

• 5. Educational portal: courses, atlases, libraries, interactive maps, methods of working with heritage.

• 6. International contour: translations, joint projects, exhibitions, cultural missions, dialogue of civilizations.

• 7. Analytics and AI: search for links, thematic graphs, reconstruction of contexts, recommendations for researchers.

• 8. Archive of family and regional memory: family funds, local history, memory of small towns, crafts and schools.

4. Soft power: practical mechanism

• Russia strengthens its humanitarian influence when it transforms heritage into an accessible, proven and up-to-date system of knowledge.

• Main channels: Russian language, culture, science, education, archives, cinema, museum collections, expeditions, traditions of the peoples of Russia and international cooperation programs.

• It is critical to separate propaganda and long-term influence: soft power works through trust, source quality, utility to partners, and respect for cultural diversity.

5. Register of indicators

IndicatorHow to MeasureMeaning
Digitized funds% of funds with digital copies and metadataAccessibility of heritage
Verified sourcesShare of objects with an expert passportTrust
Educational usenumber of courses, schools, materials connectedMemory Transfer
International projectsnumber of joint exhibitions, translations, researchesSoft power
Regional coveragenumber of subjects of the Russian Federation and municipal archivesUnity of Space
Integrity of databackups, hash control, change auditProtection of heritage

6. Roadmap for launch

• Stage 1. Inventory: Identify the core of funds, pilot regions, custodians and priority collections.

• Stage 2. Passport: create a single passport of the heritage object and a register of rights/sources.

• Stage 3. Digitization: Deploy storage, metadata standards, redundancy, access system, and change audit.

• Stage 4. Validation: form expert advice, validation laboratories, authentication protocols and chain of origin.

• Stage 5. Education and international representation: to collect courses, exhibitions, media packages, translations and partner programs.

• Stage 6. Scaling: connect regions, academic institutions, museums, libraries, universities, family and personal funds.

7. Communication with EQUILIBRIUM and balance system

• Heritage archive becomes one of the contours of the balance system: cultural, historical, educational, scientific, linguistic, regional and international balance.

• EQUILIBRIUM can use the Archive as a source of verified data, semantic connections, hereditary lines, maps of institutes, schools, personalities and territories.

• The ultimate goal is not the accumulation of files, but managed civilization memory: knowledge of origin, understanding of continuity and the ability to build the future on a proven basis.

8. Final model

Memory → Validation → Digital Archive → Education → Culture → International trust → Soft power

Other published edition: Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_presentation Rossiya_Arhiv_sohraneniya_naslediya_myagkaya_sila_presentation.pptx · Web Text +

Main idea

Heritage should become a managed infrastructure of trust and cultural influence.

No file storage

The archive is a proof system: source, origin, rights, versions, context, and access.

Not just culture

The outline includes history, language, science, education, traditions, family and regional memory.

Not propaganda

Soft power works through the quality of sources, respect, partnership, and utility to the world.

Funds

AI-analysis

Validation

ARCHIVE

NUCLEAR

Diplomacy

Digitalization

Education

Architecture Archive

From Heritage to International Humanitarian Impact.

Object

Heritage

Profile

Source

Expertise

and rights

Digital

Copy

Register

and access

Education

and media

Soft

Power

The Meaning of Chain

Each material goes from preservation and verification to inclusion in educational, scientific, cultural and international programs.

8 basic modules

The system should work as a single contour, not a set of disparate initiatives.

Unified Register

funds, facilities, persons, places, rights

Source passport

origin, status, right, trust

Validation Center

historical, scientific, legal expertise

Digital Storage

copies, metadata, reservation

Educational portal

courses, atlases, maps, mentoring

International contour

translations, exhibitions, partnerships

AI-analytics

links, graphs, contexts, search

Regional memory

family foundations, cities, crafts, schools

Soft power: mechanism

Influence is built through trust, education, culture, and the openness of trusted sources.

Culture

Science

Russian

Education

ARCHIVE

NUCLEAR

Cinema and Media

Partnerships

Museums

Archives

Validation of sources

Soft power is not possible without trust in origin, authenticity and rights.

Identification

Origin

Rights

Versions

Expertise

Level of trust

Source passport

For each object, the owner/keeper, date and place of origin, status, digital copy, metadata, rights, expert opinion and history of changes are recorded.

Single Data Space

The archive combines funds, registers, educational materials and international showcases.

Museums

Archives

Libraries

Universities

Institutions

Regions

Family Funds

Media

ARCHIVE

NUCLEAR

System output

Open showcases, research access, closed storage circuits, educational products, API for partners and analytical panels.

Roadmap for launch

A practical transition from concept to system.

1. Inventory

2. Passports

3. Digitalization

4. Validation

5. Education

6. Scaling

Pilot

Start with a limited set of funds: one federal circuit, 2–3 regions, one university block, one museum and archive block, one international showcase project.

Management indicators

What is not measured is not managed.

Digitized funds

% of funds with copies and metadata

Verified sources

Share of objects with an expert passport

Educational use

courses, schools, users

International projects

exhibitions, translations, research

Regional coverage

RF subjects and municipal funds

Integrity of data

reservation, audit, version control

Communication with EQUILIBRIUM and balance sheets

The archive becomes a source of proven meanings and data for development management.

Historical balance

International Balance

Cultural balance

ARCHIVE

NUCLEAR

Scientific balance

Language balance

Educational balance

Package of solutions

What should be prepared for the launch of the archive.

Regulations on the Archive

Single passport of source

Validation regulations

Metadata Standard

Register of funds

Pilot road map

Educational showcase

International Media Package

Management principle

First, proof and safety. Then there is access, education, cultural diplomacy and international influence.

Final formula

Heritage archives are not the past, but the infrastructure of the future.

MEMORY → VALIDATION → DIGITAL ARCHIVE → EDUCATION → CULTURE → TRUST → SOFT POWER

Main result

Russia receives a managed heritage conservation system that strengthens identity, education, scientific continuity, humanitarian cooperation and international trust.

Published files

Culture · Full published text

Heritage Preservation Archive: Academic Integration

Source Status: Primary Document

Integration model of preservation, description and transfer of scientific and cultural heritage.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/arkhiv-naslediya-akademicheskaya-integratsiya

Open on the site
Prepared for Sergey LeonidovichWorking version 26 August 2026

SECTION 01

Action to be taken

Create a distributed archive where preservation, origin and scientific use form one manageable circuit.

The archive is not a warehouse of digital copies. It is a trusted infrastructure that preserves the object, the context of its origin, rights, versions, preservation events, and links to research.

№DecisionContents
1Approve MissionPreserve documentary, scientific, technological, natural and digital heritage and return it to research circulation.
2Adopting a Federal ModelThe originals remain with the legal custodians; the general outline combines identifiers, metadata, copies of the preservation, and access rules.
3Appointing an Academic ExpertiseThe scientific council determines the value, sufficiency of the description, permissible interpretations and priorities of digitization.
4Run 16 registersFunds, objects, origin, status, rights, digital copies, preservation events, research and risks.
5Conduct 18-month pilotThree heterogeneous collections, 1 000 priority objects, 300 master copies, restoration verification and research reuse.

SECTION 02

The mission and boundaries of the archive

Heritage preservation is understood as a long-term responsibility and access as a managed service for certain communities.

  • Preserve. Prevent physical loss, media decay, format loss, context, and attribution.
  • Prove it. Identify the origin, chain of ownership and storage, basis of authenticity, version and event of the intervention.
  • Connect. Connect objects with people, institutions, territories, projects, data, publications and educational scenarios.
  • Open responsibly. Share public, research, restricted and closed access; consider rights, ethics and security.
  • Return to action. Use heritage in research, restoration, engineering, education, exhibitions and public dialogue.

SECTION 03

What is included in the legacy

A single system must take into account different physical and digital modes of preservation.

ClassExamples
DocumentaryManuscripts, correspondence, protocols, reports, field journals, dissertations, maps, drawings.
ScientificObservation series, laboratory journals, data, models, code, techniques, collections of samples.
The technologicalDesign documentation, prototypes, instruments, technological maps, patent materials.
NaturalKerns, soils, minerals, herbariums, biological collections, ecological series of observations.
CulturallyArchaeological materials, photos, sound, cinema, expedition collections, oral history.
DigitalBorn-digital documents, databases, websites, e-mails, virtual models and digital twins.

The management unit can be a fund, collection, inventory, case, item, sample, file, data set or a composite digital object. Hierarchy is recorded explicitly, not displayed from the folder name.

SECTION 04

Seven contours of the target architecture

The archive should be both a custodian, a research infrastructure and a trust system.

ContourPurposeContents
01Management and acquisitionAcceptance policy, criteria of value, contracts, rights, ethics, priorities.
02Physical safetyQuarantine, stabilization, climate, packaging, restoration, movement accounting.
03DigitizationShooting, calibration, master files, derivative copies, quality control.
04Long-term digital storagePackages of preservation, checksums, events, migrations and verifiable copies.
05Description and knowledgePassports, provenance, ontology, dictionaries, communications, and sustainable identifiers.
06Academic useExpertise, projects, publications, citations, training and enrichment of descriptions.
07Access and sustainabilityAccess Roles, Cybersecurity, Disaster Recovery, Audit, and Public Services.

SECTION 05

Object Life Cycle

Each action leaves a verifiable trace and updates the object’s passport.

StepEventResult
1IdentificationPreliminary description and risk of loss.
2Examination of valueScientific, cultural, technological and territorial significance.
3AppointmentsLegal basis, act, origin, limitations.
4Quarantine and stabilizationInspection, isolation, primary preservation measures.
5DescriptionIdentifier, hierarchy, faces, places, dates, connections.
6DigitizationMaster, derivative copies, parameters and quality control.
7Package of safetyFiles, metadata, checksums, events, and copies.
8Academic reviewVerification of attribution, context and description quality.
9Access and citationRights, audit of issuance, reference to the object and version.
10MonitoringMedia status, file integrity, formats and risks.
11Migration / RestorationControlled intervention with documented result.
12ReuseThe study enriches the passport without rewriting the original certificate.

SECTION 06

Object passport

The minimum record should support safety, evidence, access, and research use.

BlockRequired fields
IdentificationID, name, type, hierarchy level, fund/collection, alternative numbers.
Creation and contextAuthor/creator, dating, place/coordinates, language, discipline, circumstances of creation.
OriginPrevious owners and custodians, transfer, basis of ownership, discontinuities and disputed sites.
AuthenticityBasis of attribution, examination, signature, printing, analysis of materials, level of confidence.
Material objectMedia, dimensions, completeness, condition, damage, packaging, storage place.
Rights and EthicsCopyright holder, license, personal/sensitive information, limitation regime and term.
Digital representationsMaster and derivative files, formats, shooting parameters, color profile, OCR/HTR.
SecurityControl amounts, events PREMIS, formats, migrations, copies, integrity checks.
ConnectionsIndividuals, organizations, projects, territories, publications, data sets, exhibitions, versions.
ManagementResponsible custodian, risk priority, date of review, description status and reviewer.

SECTION 07

Register of funds and collections

The main catalog answers the questions: what is stored, where, on what basis and in what state.

FieldContentsPurpose
Fund codeASN-FND-000001Stable internal identifier.
NameOfficial and historical namesIt is not replaced when renaming.
Foundation EducationPerson / organization / expeditionRelationship with registers of persons and organizations.
Extreme DatesHGH-HGH or uncertainty intervalSeparate from the date of receipt.
Volume and compositionStorage units, media types, languagesSupports resource planning.
OriginChain of storage and receiptsThe key to authenticity and interpretation.
Legal statusPossession, storage, rights, restrictionsReason for access and use.
StateSummary assessment and critical risksDetermines the stabilization queue.
LocationKeeper, room, backupPublic representation can be generalized.
ConnectionsDescriptions, objects, publications, projectsCreates an academic knowledge graph.

SECTION 08

Sixteen interrelated registries

The register of funds is the core, but the safety is ensured by a system of related entities.

CodeRegisterWhat records
ASN-01Funds and collectionsHierarchy, composition, owners, custodians.
ASN-02Objects and storage unitsItems, cases, samples, files and composite objects.
ASN-03FacesCreators, researchers, collectors, restorers.
ASN-04OrganizationsInstitutions, expeditions, custodians, successors.
ASN-05Origin and transmissionsThe chain of ownership, storage and transmission bases.
ASN-06Descriptions and classifiersRubrics, thesauruses, ontologies and versions of descriptions.
ASN-07Rights, access and ethicsRights holders, licenses, restrictions, decisions.
ASN-08Status and restorationInspections, damage, interventions, materials.
ASN-09DigitizationSessions, equipment, parameters, master and derivatives.
ASN-10Digital Preservation EventsControl amounts, formats, migration, validation.
ASN-11Storage areas and copiesPhysical addresses, digital replicas, responsible.
ASN-12Research and publicationsProjects, data sets, articles, citations, interpretations.
ASN-13Exhibitions and educationExposures, courses, media, public reuse.
ASN-14Risks and incidentsThreats, accidents, losses, response, recovery.
ASN-15Scientific Collections and SamplesTaxa, selection points, methods, storage conditions.
ASN-16Transformation of organizationsRenaming, Mergers, Separations, Predecessors and Successors.

SECTION 09

How the Archive Enters the Academic Environment

Scientific integration does not begin with a portal, but with the distribution of responsibility.

ParticipantResponsibility
Academic CouncilAcquisition policy, value, controversial attribution, priorities, and scientific ethics.
Profile institutionsSubject examination, methods of description, instrument studies and research issues.
Archives, libraries, museumsStorage, cataloguing, restoration, reader access and professional regulations.
UniversitiesPractices, master and post-graduate projects, digitalization laboratories, educational collections.
CSP and LabsSpectroscopy, tomography, materials science, dating, climatic and biological analyses.
Publishers and RepositoriesDOI, publications, data, versions, object citations and open research products.
Owners of HeritageLegal grounds, context of origin, traditional knowledge, sensitivity regimes.
Independent expertsQuality control, safety audit, restoration, rights and reproducibility.

Intelligent Archive System

The intellectual layer does not replace the catalogue, scientific expert or custodian. It speeds up the discovery of connections, proposes hypotheses, and preserves the foundations of each machine inference.

FunctionRole in the archive
Knowledge GraphConnects objects, funds, people, institutions, projects, publications, devices, places and events.
RecognitionOCR/HTR, recognition of tables, diagrams and signatures; original image remains unchanged.
Extracting entitiesOffers names, dates, geography, organizations, and scientific terms with a level of confidence.
Resolution of identitiesIt compares variants of names with registers of persons and organizations; ambiguity is not hidden.
Semantic searchSearches for meaning, temporal and spatial connections, not just for exact words.
Expert AssistantPrepares a selection of sources, a comparison of versions and a draft description; the decision is made by an authorized expert.
Quality controlIt identifies omissions, contradictions, duplicates, metadata anomalies and risks of loss of formats.
Transparency AIFor each proposal, the model, version, input, date, confidence, checker and the result of the decision are fixed.

SECTION 10

Academic cycle of reuse

The archival object becomes part of the reproducible study, and the result is returned to the passport as a new version of the interpretation.

StepActionMonitoring
1RequestThe researcher formulates the question, the sample and the legal regime.
2ExtraditionThe system captures the object, version, files and conditions of use.
3MethodProtocol, equipment, code, calibration and responsible.
4DataThe derived set receives an identifier and a link to the sources.
5ConclusionThe interpretation is reviewed and does not replace the original description.
6PublicationThe article/data cites the stable object ID and version.
7EnrichmentNew attributes and connections are added with authorship and confidence levels.
8VerificationAnother researcher can repeat the sample and trace the origin.

SECTION 11

List of institutions: the core of preservation and history of science

Below is a map of potential expert nodes; participation is formalized by separate agreements and is not expected automatically.

Archives, Libraries and the History of Science

Institute / nodeCompetenceRole in the archive
Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ARAN)Archiving, source studies, academic documentationMethodological custodian; stock model; provenance examination and scientific description.
Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences (BAS)Rare books, manuscripts, academic publicationsBibliographic description, preservation of book collections, reader access.
Library of Natural Sciences RAS (BEN RAS)Distributed network of natural science librariesConnection of institute collections, catalogs, scientific periodicals, service of researchers.
INION RASScientific information on social sciencesThesauruses, bibliography, humanitarian collections and information search.
IYET them. S.I. Vavilov RASHistory of natural science and technologyHistorical context of instruments, schools, expeditions, institutes and technological lines.

Archaeology, Ethnology and Cultural Heritage

Institute / nodeCompetenceRole in the archive
Institute of Archaeology RASArchaeological Research and Scientific CollectionsAttribution, context of findings, field documentation, mode of publishing coordinates.
Institute of the History of Material Culture RASArchaeology and the history of material cultureDescription of subject collections, expedition archives, dating methods.
Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RASEthnology, anthropology, traditional culturesEthics, Sensitive Materials, Oral History, Community Context.
Institute of Russian History RASHistory of Russia and Source StudiesExamination of historical buildings and scientific interpretation of documents.
Institute of General History RASWorld HistoryInternational context, comparative collections, scientific connections.
Institute of Slavic Studies RASHistory, languages and cultures of Slavic peoplesMultilingual description and regional attribution.
Institute of Oriental Studies RASHistory, languages and cultures of Asia and AfricaRare languages, manuscripts, transliteration, cultural restrictions.
Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkin House) RASLiterary and handwritten collectionsTextology, variants of works, personal funds and digital publications.

SECTION 12

List of Institutions: Atmosphere, Earth and Ocean

These nodes are needed to preserve observation rows, expedition archives, maps, samples, and history of natural change.

Atmosphere, climate and remote observations

Institute / nodeCompetenceRole in the archive
Institute of Atmospheric Physics. A.M. Obukhov RASAtmospheric physics, climate, turbulence, observation stationsExamination of climatic series, instruments, station magazines and models.
Institute of Atmospheric Optics. W.E. Zueva SB RASOptical methods of atmospheric and ocean researchLidar and spectral data, calibration, instrument archives.
Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SB RASSolar-terrestrial relations and the upper atmosphereObservatories, geophysical instruments, long-term observations.
Institute of Space Research RASSpace research and remote sensingSatellite data, telemetry, scientific equipment, software products.

Geophysics, Geology, Geochemistry and Geography

Institute / nodeCompetenceRole in the archive
Institute of Earth Physics. O.J. Schmidt RASGeophysics, seismology, structure of the EarthSeismic series, maps, stations, instruments and interpretations.
Institute of Geosphere Dynamics. M.A. Sadovsky RASDynamic processes in geospheresExperimental data, georisks, instrument complexes.
GEOCHI them. V.I. Vernadsky RASGeochemistry and Analytical ChemistryChemical attribution, standards, analysis of the composition and origin of materials.
IGEM RASGeology of ore deposits, petrography, mineralogy, geochemistryMineralogical collections, grinds, cores, maps and field diaries.
Institute of Geography RASPhysical and socio-economic geographyCartographic funds, geodata, territorial and climatic context.
Institute of Water Problems RASWater resources and hydrologyHydrological series, basin models, monitoring and territorial programs.
Institute of Oceanology. P.P. Shirshov RASOceanology and marine expeditionsShip logs, itineraries, marine specimens, instruments and long-term series.

SECTION 13

List of institutions: physical chemistry and materials

The material expertise links the origin, condition, authenticity and safe restoration of objects.

Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics and Materials Analysis

Institute / nodeCompetenceRole in the archive
IFHE them. A.N. Frumkin RASPhysical chemistry, electrochemistry, corrosion, surfacesDiagnostics of metals and coatings, corrosion risks, conservation materials.
Institute of Chemical Physics. N.N. Semyonov RASChemical physics, kinetics and aging processesMechanisms of degradation of polymers, paper, coatings and composites.
Institute of Biochemical Physics. N.M. Emanuel RASBiochemical physics, polymers, aging materialsEvaluation of stability of organic carriers and protective media.
Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry. N.S. Kurnakova RASInorganic Chemistry and Functional MaterialsComposition of pigments, ceramics, glass, salts and mineral materials.
Institute of organoelements. A.N. NesmeyanovaOrganic and elemental organic chemistryPolymers, binders, adhesives and compatibility of restoration materials.
Institute of Organic Chemistry. N.D. Zelin RASOrganic Chemistry and Analytical MethodsIdentification of organic substances, contaminants and decay products.
Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science. A.A. Baikova RASMetals, ceramics, composite materialsMetallographic examination, manufacturing technology and safety.
Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis. A.V. Topchieva RASPolymers, membranes, petrochemical materialsDiagnostics of synthetic carriers and selection of barrier materials.
Institute of Catalysis. G.K. Boreskova SB RASCatalysis and physicochemical methodsAnalytical examination of surfaces and chemical transformations.

SECTION 14

List of institutions: biological and natural heritage

For specimens and living collections, the passport must include origin, selection method, taxonomy, storage conditions, and biosafety.

Biology, ecology, soils and forests

Institute / nodeCompetenceRole in the archive
IEEE them. A.N. Severtsova RASEcology and animal evolutionZoological collections, field observations, taxonomy and biodiversity.
FIC Biotechnology RAS / Institute of Microbiology S.N. VinogradskyMicrobiology and biotechnologyMicrobial collections, biodamages, biosafety and storage conditions.
Institute of Plant Physiology. K.A. Timiryazeva RASPlant PhysiologyPlant samples, experimental series and conditions of reproducibility.
The main botanical garden. N.V. Cicin RASLive and Herbarium Plant CollectionsCollectible policy, taxonomy, origin of samples, public interpretation.
Institute of Forestry RASForest ecosystems and long-term observationsField archives, test areas, wood samples and climate links.
Institute of Internal Water Biology. I.D. Papanina RASInland water ecosystemsHydrobiological collections, monitoring series, samples and methods.
Institute of Ecology of Volga Basin RASRegional ecology and biodiversityTerritorial collections, environmental series and links to recovery programs.
The Soil Institute. V.V. DokuchaevaSoil Science and Soil CollectionsSoil monoliths, profiles, maps, selection points and analytical data.

SECTION 15

Technical and metadata framework

Standards are used as a compatible framework, not as an end in themselves.

BaseApplication
ISO 14721:2025 (OAIS)Archive responsibility, defined community, reception, storage, data management, access, and long-term preservation.
PREMIS 3.0Objects, events, agents and rights; checksums, migrations, validations and proofs of preservation actions.
METS 2 / METS 1Packaging descriptive, administrative and structural metadata of a complex digital object.
Dublin Core TermsBasic interdisciplinary fields of discovery and exchange: name, creator, date, type, format, rights, connections.
IIIF 3.0Compatible representation of images and composite objects; scaling, annotations, search, and managed access.
ORCID / ROR / DOISustainable identifiers of researchers, organizations and research results.
  • Formats. Maintain a register of formats and validation profiles; retain a lossless master file and derivative copies for access.
  • Integrity. Fix checksums when accepting and check all replicas regularly.
  • Copies. Maintain multiple verifiable copies in geographically and administratively spaced outlines.
  • Versions. Do not rewrite a record without a history; each substantial edit has an author, date, basis, and link to the source.
  • Exports. Provide machine-readable export of records, links, and security packages without reference to a single vendor.

SECTION 16

Access, rights and ethics

Openness does not mean no restrictions: OAIS does not directly equate “open” to unlimited access.

ModeContentsMonitoring
PublicDescription and permitted derivative copiesAnonymous access, open license or clear terms of use.
ResearchHigh resolution, additional fields, data setsApplication, research objective, agreement and audit.
LimitedPersonal, culturally sensitive, vulnerable geodataDecision of the owner/committee, minimization, term and conditions.
ClosedState, commercial, biological or other protected informationIsolated contour, tolerance, logging, prohibition of public indexing.

SECTION 17

Safety and Continuity

The system must survive vendor failure, site loss, operator error, and targeted attack.

MonitoringRequirement
ClassificationCategories of data and objects, owners of risk, permissible processing environments.
Identification and rolesSeparate roles of custodian, describer, expert, administrator and auditor.
Unchanged logReceiving, issuing, changing metadata, downloading, migrating, deleting, and restoring.
Cryptographic IntegrityControl amounts, signed manifestos, regular line-up checks.
Isolated copiesBackups with no permanent availability from the workflow.
Emergency PlanRescue priorities, contacts, equipment, alternative sites and exercises.
Withdrawal from the supplierExport objects, metadata, logs, and rights in a documented format.
Independent auditPeriodic review of restoration, rights, access and preservation events.

SECTION 18

Role management and distribution

Scientific authenticity, storage and operation of the platform should not be confined to one center.

RoleCredentials
Founder / CustomerMission, funding, legal model and control of public responsibility.
Academic CouncilRecruitment policy, priorities, controversial attribution and appeals.
Scientific and Methodological CouncilPassport, classifiers, metadata, quality profiles and interdisciplinary rules.
Guardian of the originalPhysical preservation, inventory, access and documentation of interventions.
Digital Archive OperatorPacket acceptance, replication, integrity, migration, availability, and logs.
Profile InstituteSubject examination, research and review of enriched descriptions.
Committee on Rights and EthicsLimitations, personal data, cultural sensitivity and conflict of interest.
Independent AuditorSecurity, recovery, metadata and declared indicators.

SECTION 19

Integration with the Earth Revival Ecosystem

The roles below are the proposed design scheme and require separate approval.

ComponentProposed role
Academic RegistersCanonical identifiers, entities, versions, proofs, and connections.
EQUILIBRIUMKnowledge Graph, Risk Monitoring, Status Analytics and Interdisciplinary Links.
SFERAPublic and partner access, virtual exhibitions, educational routes and community participation.
ECO-PPAPrograms, agreements, restoration funding and social/territorial impact indicators.
NPK NPO "SPECZASHCHITA"Protection, secure logistics, emergency response, pilots storage and digitization; no right of sole scientific attribution.

SECTION 20

Pilot for 18 months

The pilot checks not the volume of digitization, but the full cycle: from reception to scientific reuse and restoration of the copy.

TimeframePhaseResult
0–3Management and selectionAdvice, policy, 3 collections, owners, rights, original risk assessment.
4–6Inventory1 000 priority objects, passports, status, provenance, 6 registers of the first wave.
7–12Digitization and storage300 master copies, preservation packages, replicas, checksums, research office.
13–15Academic CasesNo less than 3 research projects, enrichment of descriptions, correct citation.
16–18Audit and decisionRecovery exercise, checking rights and quality, scaling decision.
  • Collection A is a scientific archive. Field logs, observational data, maps and instrument documentation.
  • Collection B is a technological heritage. Drawings, photos, test reports and material samples.
  • Collection C is a cultural or natural heritage. Complex objects, sensitive rights, scientific attribution and public scenario.

SECTION 21

Outcome indicators

Metrics should show trust, safety and use, not just the number of scans.

IndicatorMeaning
TraceabilityProportion of objects with proven proven provenance and storage basis.
StateThe proportion of priority objects with an up-to-date inspection and preservation plan.
IntegrityThe proportion of packages that have passed the checksum check in all required copies.
ResiliencyThe success and time of the control recovery from an independent copy.
RightsThe proportion of objects with a certain access mode, the basis and the term of revision.
Quality of descriptionCompleteness of mandatory fields and the share of entries with academic review.
Scientific useProjects, publications, data sets and citations of persistent ID objects.
EnrichmentVerified new attributes, links and fixes with saved version history.
AccessThe time of execution of requests for modes and the percentage of failures with a documented basis.
IncidentsQuantity, severity, detection and closing time, repeatability of causes.

SECTION 22

Key risks and controls

The main risk is to create a beautiful catalog without safety, rights and scientific responsibility.

RiskLevelMeasure
Loss of physical objectHighPassport status, priorities, packaging, climate, emergency plan.
Controversial authenticityHighProvenance, confidence levels, multiple examinations, version history, and appeal.
Obsolete formatsHighRegister formats, validation, migrations and saving the original wizard.
Undefined rightsHighLegal passport before publication; default restrictions before decision.
Sensitive dataHighMinimization, access levels, ethics committee, journaling.
Cyber Attack / EncryptorHighSegmentation, MFA, isolated copies, monitoring, exercises.
Supplier MonopolyMediumOpen exports, documented profiles, regular exit test.
Metadata overloadMediumMinimum core, profiles by object type, automation and quality control.
Formal integration of institutionsHighResponsible experts, SLA reviews, paid roles, reuse metrics.
Unstable fundingHighSeparate long-term funding for storage and project research.

SECTION 23

Decisions of the first meeting

The launch starts with authority, rules, and pilot, not platform purchase.

№Draft decision
01Approve the mission, heritage boundaries and federal model.
02To create Academic and Scientific-Methodological Councils; to approve conflicts of interest and appeals.
03Appoint owners of 16 registries and custodians of three pilot collections.
04Approve the minimum passport of the object, the register of funds and levels of evidence.
05Approve access modes, rights, ethics, security classification and journaling.
06Choose three pilot collections and consolidate quantitative benchmarks as a plan, not a guarantee.
07Approve the digital preservation architecture based on OAIS/PREMIS/METS and the exit plan from the supplier.
08Assign control points at 6, 12 and 18 months and an independent recovery audit.

Result

The archive should preserve not only things and files, but also the ability to understand their provenance, meaning and place in the history of science - and then safely use this knowledge for research, education and restoration of territories.

SECTION 24

Sources and standards

Official sources fix the regulatory framework; the institute list is used as a project map of competencies.

[S1] UNESCO — Memory of the World

[S2] ISO 14721:2025 — Reference model for an OAIS

[S3] Library of Congress — PREMIS

[S4] Library of Congress — METS

[S5] DCMI Metadata Terms

[S6] IIIF API Specifications

[S7] ORCID — persistent researcher identifiers

[S8] ROR — research organization identifiers

[S9] RAS — directory of scientific institutions

[S10] Institute of Atmospheric Physics. A.M. Obukhov RAS

[S11] IFHE. A.N. Frumkina RAS - general information

[S12] IYET them. S.I. Vavilova RAS — brief reference

[S13] RAS Archives — RAS Archives Information System

[S14] BEN RAN

Other published edition: HERITAGE RESERVATION ARCHIVE Archive_preservation_heritage_Academic_integration.pptx · Web Text +

Integration with the academic environment

Object → origin → scientific attribution → conservation → research reuse

Project competency map. The participation of institutions requires separate agreements.

Archive — active research infrastructure

PROJECT MODEL

Value does not arise at the time of placing the object for storage, but when its origin, condition and meaning are proven.

SAVE

ATRIBUTE

CONTACT US

BACK TO SCIENCE

master file, physical media, integrity control

author, organization, time, context and scientific line

people, institutions, projects, publications, places and events

access, citation, analysis, publication and educational scenarios

The archive stores not only files, it stores verifiable connections and decision history.

What we are preserving

LIMITS OF THE SUBJECT

DOCUMENTS

SCIENTIFIC DATA

manuscripts, reports, protocols, correspondence

observations, measurements, journals, calculations

VISUAL CERTIFICATES

OBJECTS AND COLLECTIONS

photos, movies, maps, drawings, diagrams

devices, samples, models, standards

EASTERN HISTORY

DIGITAL MATERIALS

Interviews, memories, school testimonies

Software, databases, web resources, digital models

Seven contours of architecture

PROJECT MODEL

ACCEPTANCE

agreement and completeness

Key principle

TRAINING

Single ID

Each action becomes a conservation event: who, when, what changed and on what basis.

CONSERVATION

masters, copies, migrations

DESCRIPTION

Metadata and origin

EXPERTISE

Attribution and scientific status

ACCESS

law, ethics, publication

REPEATMENT

Research and Education

Object life cycle: 12 steps to be checked

PROJECT MODEL

Identification

Negotiations

Legal review

Appointments

Quarantine

Digitization

Quality control

Description

Expertise

Saving

Access

Reassessment

Re-evaluation closes the cycle: new knowledge refines description, rights and access mode.

Object passport - minimum evidentiary package

PROJECT MODEL

ID, Name, Type, Language

creator, fund, ownership history

IDENTITY

ORIGIN

dates, geography, expedition

abstract, topics, key concepts

TIME AND PLACE

CONTENTS

people, institutions, projects, publications

format, size, carrier, checksum

LINKS

TECHNOLOGY

risks, restoration, preservation

copyright holder, restrictions, consents

STATE

RIGHTS AND ETHICS

Who and on what basis did you confirm

permanent link and recommended link

EXPERTISE

CITIZING

System of 16 related registries

NUCLEAR STUDY

Funds and collections

Storage facilities

Digital representations

Persons and scientific schools

Organizations

Projects and programs

Expeditions

Publications

Instruments and installations

Samples and series

Save Events

Rights and restrictions

Expertise

Geographical objects

Thematic rubrics

Requests and Uses

The connection of registers allows you to go from the storage unit to the institute, the scientific school, the method and the result of use.

How the archive is embedded in the academic environment

PROJECT MODEL

INSTITUTE — STATER

PROFILE EXPERT

ARCHIVE / LIBRARY

describes the context, transmits materials, appoints a curator

verifies attribution, scientific significance and terminology

provides accounting, safety, rights and reference apparatus

STUDENT

DATA CENTER / IT

COORDINATION BOARD

accesses, quotes the object, returns the publication and conclusions

supports replication, identifiers, API and event logs

Approves rules, priorities and resolves disputes

ORCID Connects the authors; ROR — organizations; permanent identifiers - objects and publications.

Archives, Libraries, History and Culture

COMPETENCE MAP

ARAN

BAN / BEN RAS

INION RAS

acquisition, scientific NSA, archival attribution

bibliography, rare publications, scientific publications

Social and scientific information and thesaurus

IYET them. Vavilov

IA RAS / IIMK RAS

IEA RAS

History of science, technology and scientific schools

Archaeological collections and field materials

Ethnographic Collections and Access Ethics

IRI / IVI RAS

IV RAS / ISl RAS

Pushkin House

Source Studies and Historical Context

handwritten traditions, languages, regional schools

Literary Archives, Foundations and Textual Studies

The names and affiliations are specified before the conclusion of agreements.

Atmosphere, Earth and Ocean

DETAILED MAP OF INSTITUTES

atmospheric series, stations, instruments; scientific verification

optical methods, lidar observations, calibrations

IFA them. A. M. Obukhov RAS

IOA S S RAS

solar-terrestrial data, observatories, time series

space observations, telemetry, digital arrays

ISZF SB RAS

IKI RAS

geophysics, seismology, geodynamic data

dynamics of geospheres, dangerous processes, modeling

IFZ them. Oh. J. Schmidt RAS

IDG RAS

geochemical collections, analyses, origin of samples

mineralogy, petrography, collections and grindings

GEOKHI RAS

IGEM RAS

maps, expeditions, landscape series

water systems, hydrological data and models

Institute of Geography RAS

IWP RAS

flights, stations, samples, oceanographic data

Institute of Oceanology RAS

Proposed role: Context provider, profile expertise and reuse; participation is not expected automatically.

Physical Chemistry and Materials

DETAILED MAP OF INSTITUTES

IFHE them. A. N. Frumkin RAS

IHF them. N. N. Semyonov RAS

IBHF them. N. M. Emanuel RAS

electrochemistry, corrosion, surfaces; passport methods and samples

chemical physics, kinetics, instrument and laboratory archives

biochemical physics, long-term experiments and protocols

IONI them. N. C. Kurnakova RAS

INES them. A. N. Nesmeyanova

IOH them. N. D. Zelin RAS

inorganic compounds, syntheses, standards and collections

elementoorganic chemistry, spectra, author's schools

organic chemistry, catalytic systems, laboratory journals

HAS them. A. A. Baikova RAS

INHS them. A. B. Topchieva RAS

Institute of Catalysis SB RAS

metals and materials, technological modes and samples

Petrochemistry, membranes, processes and test data

catalysts, installations, kinetic data and models

For chemical collections, the hazards, composition, storage conditions, chain of origin and the right to technological knowledge are particularly important.

Biology and Natural Heritage

DETAILED MAP OF INSTITUTES

IEEE them. A. N. Severtsova RAS

FIC Biotechnology RAS

zoological series, monitoring, field diaries

strains, protocols, microbiological collections

IFR them. K. A. Timiryazeva RAS

GBS them. N. B. Cicin RAS

plant experiments, herbarium and physiological data

living collections, origin of samples, observations

Institute of Forestry RAS

IBVT them. I. D. Papanina RAS

forest stations, long rows, maps

aquatic ecosystems, hydrobiological collections

Institute of Ecology of Volga Basin RAS

The Soil Institute. B. B. Dokuchaeva

Regional Monitoring and Biodiversity

soil profiles, maps, samples and classifications

Access mode takes into account biosecurity, sensitive species coordinates and rights to genetic resources.

Standards: compatibility without loss of context

TECHNICAL FRAMEWORK

Functional model of long-term conservation

OAIS

Important

events, agents, rights and evidence of preservation

PREMIS

OAIS is neither a program nor a format. This is a reference model of the functions and responsibilities of the archive.

An open archive does not mean unlimited access.

Structural packaging of a complex digital object

METS

basic inter-system description

DCMI

delivery of images and annotations

IIIF

sustainable links between authors and organizations

ORCID / ROR

constant citation of objects and sets

DOI / PID

Governance, rights and sustainability

PROJECT MODEL

3-2-1

COORDINATION BOARD

three copies, two media types, one deleted

Policies, priorities, disputes and external agreements

FIXITY

Regular verification of checksums

SCIENTIFIC ADVICE

RIGHTS

significance criteria, experts, terminology and attribution quality

contract, license, restrictions and term

ETHICS

ARCHIVE OPERATOR

Personal data, sensitive places and knowledge

accounting, security, access, reporting and continuity

CONTINUITY

the Migration Formats and Disaster Recovery Plan

Pilot for 18 months

PLANNING ORIENTORS

6–10

11–14

15–18

PREPARATION

ACCEPTANCE

PROCESSING

INTEGRATION

EVALUATION

policies, partners, selection criteria

Three Collections and Legal Basis

digitization, description, quality control

examination, identifiers, test access

research cases and decision on scale

1 000

300

COLLECTIONS

PRIORITY OBJECTS

DIGITAL MASTERS

RESEARCH CASES

The guidelines serve to design the pilot and are not a guarantee of result.

Intelligent Archive System

THE PERSON CONFIRMS THE CONCLUSION

AI speeds up description and search, but does not receive the right to change the canonical record imperceptibly.

KNOWLEDGE GRAF

OCR / HTR

EXCHANGE OF ESSENCES

objects ↔ funds ↔ people ↔ institutes ↔ projects ↔ publications

text, tables, signatures and manuscripts; original remains unchanged

names, dates, locations, organizations and terms with a level of confidence

RESOLVED IDENTITY

SEMANTIC SEARCH

QUALITY CONTROL

options names and names are compared with registries

search by meaning, time, place and scientific line

omissions, contradictions, duplicates and risks of formats

Control: model and version → input data → confidence → expert → solution → event log

Closed materials are not used for external training without a separate legal basis.

What you need to decide to launch

DECISION BY THE INSTITUTOR

Approve the mission and boundaries of the archive

Appoint an operator and policy holder

Select three pilot collections

Establishing a Scientific and Coordination Council

Start negotiations with relevant institutions

Approve the budget, control points and scale criteria

The archive becomes a knowledge infrastructure when a stored object can be checked, linked to a science school, and reused.

SPECZASHCHITA may be an operator of security and infrastructure, but does not replace specialized scientific expertise.

Sources cited in presentation 27

  • Internal: project concept “Archive of heritage preservation - integration with the academic environment”, 2026.
  • Generated visual: OpenAI image generation, created for this project, 2026.
  • UNESCO Memory of the World: https://www.unesco.org/en/memory-world
  • ISO 14721:2025 OAIS: https://www.iso.org/standard/87471.html
  • Internal: proposed scope and classification of heritage objects, 2026.
  • Internal: proposed archive architecture, 2026.
  • PREMIS Data Dictionary: https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/index.html
  • DCMI Metadata Terms: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/
  • METS: https://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/
  • PREMIS: https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/index.html
  • Internal: proposed registry system, 2026.
  • ORCID: https://support.orcid.org/hc/en-us/articles/360006973993-What-is-ORCID
  • Research Organization Registry: https://ror.org/about/
  • Internal: proposed academic integration model, 2026.
  • Russian Academy of Sciences directory: https://www.ras.ru/docs/rasreference.html
  • Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences information system: https://db.isaran.ru/
  • S. I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology: https://ihst.ru/about/
  • A. M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics: https://ifaran.ru/ru/about
  • Internal: proposed roles; participation is not presumed, 2026.
  • Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry: https://phyche.ac.ru/contact/general-information
  • DCMI: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/
  • IIIF APIs: https://iiif.io/api/
  • ROR: https://ror.org/about/
  • Internal: proposed governance and security model, 2026.
  • Internal: proposed 18-month pilot plan and target indicators; planning assumptions, not guarantees, 2026.
  • Internal: proposed intelligent archive layer and human-validation controls, 2026.
  • Internal: proposed launch decisions and role boundaries, 2026.

Published files

Culture · Full published text

SFERA World Film Portal

Source Status: Primary Document

The concept of a digital space for cinema, authors, cultural projects and international interaction.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/vsemirnyi-portal-kino-sfera

Open on the site

Conceptual strategic document

Version 1.0 • 2026

1. Strategic Summary

SFERA is a global cinematic ecosystem where films become not a commodity of attention, but carriers of meaning, culture, memory and future.

The project "SFERA - World Cinema Portal" is proposed as an international digital platform of a new generation, combining cinema, cultural heritage, education, archives, festivals, creative laboratories, artificial intelligence technologies and cultural diplomacy.

Unlike the classic video service, SFERA is designed not as a system of attention retention, but as an infrastructure for human and cultural development. At the center of the platform are semantic navigation, preservation of national cinematography, support of authors, work with youth and creation of an international dialogue space.

The strategic objective of the project is to form a digital cultural house of world cinema, in which each country, school, studio, festival and author get their own presentation, and the viewer gets the opportunity to open films not only by genre and rating, but also by topics, values, eras, cultural traditions and educational tasks.

Key principles

  • Cinema as a language of civilizations and a means of cultural dialogue.
  • Preservation of heritage and transmission of cultural memory between generations.
  • Support for national cinema and international co-production.
  • Education through cinema and the development of spectator culture.
  • Artificial intelligence is like a navigator in terms of meaning, not just as a recommendation algorithm.
  • Open international architecture while preserving the cultural sovereignty of the participating countries.

2. Mission and positioning

Mission

To create an international space of world cinema, in which image, history and culture become tools of mutual understanding, education, memory preservation and future design.

Positioning

SFERA - World Film Portal, which unites cultural heritage, modern technologies and films of the future.

Meaning of the name

SFERA is an image of integrity: the planet, the screen, the viewer’s eye, the space of meanings and a single system in which national cinematography does not dissolve, but becomes visible and connected.

SThemes
FFilms
EUnity
RDevelopment
AAuthors

3. Platform architecture

SFERA = Film Archive + Film Education + Festival Map + Creative Laboratory + International Communication + Artificial Intelligence + Cultural Diplomacy.

№ModuleFunction
1Home SFERAWorld film, cultural events, premieres, archival discoveries, authors and special projects.
2World Film ArchiveCatalogue of films by countries, eras, schools, genres, themes and cultural meaning.
3National CinematographyThe history of cinema in each country, key directors, studios, festivals, schools and opportunities for cooperation.
4Cinema Academy SFERAScreenplay, directing, camera art, acting, producing, editing, sound, film history and AI in film.
5The Future Film LaboratoryBank of ideas, script laboratories, pitching, co-production and gathering of international creative teams.
6Festival map of the worldInteractive map of festivals, markets, forums, film screenings and industrial events.
7Cinema clubs SFERANetwork of online and offline clubs in schools, universities, libraries, cultural centers and international communities.
8PersonalitiesA single base of directors, actors, screenwriters, operators, composers, producers and film researchers.
9Cinema and the StateSection of cultural policy, national programs, international agreements and film support measures.
10SFERA AIIntelligent search, semantic navigation, subtitles and translation, assistance to authors, scenario analysis and educational routes.

4. Users and value

The audience. Access to the best world cinema, cultural routes, film clubs and educational collections.

Authors. Partner search, pitching projects, training, international visibility and access to co-productions.

Studios and producers. Search for scripts, talents, markets, festivals, distribution and partnerships.

States and cultural institutions. Representation of national culture, support of cultural sovereignty and international diplomacy.

Schools and Universities. Proven educational collections and methodical routes through cinema.

Festivals. A single map, calendar, communication with the audience and authors, digital shows and an archive of festival programs.

Children and youth. The formation of cultural taste, media literacy and the ability to read film language.

5. Intelligent circuit SFERA AI

AI-contour SFERA should be focused on cultural navigation and creativity support, rather than on the mechanical maximization of viewing time.

  • search for a film on a topic, event, era, value or cultural task;
  • Semantic map of world cinema and links between films, authors, schools and historical events;
  • automated subtitles, translation and language adaptation;
  • educational collections for schools, universities and film clubs;
  • Assistant writer and director with a focus on structure, research and factual verification;
  • analytics of scripts and projects for producers and laboratories;
  • careful work with archives: description, tagging, context recovery and search for related materials.

6. International Cultural Diplomacy

SFERA can become an infrastructure for cultural dialogue between countries, especially where direct political dialogue is limited. Through joint retrospectives, festivals, thematic seasons, co-production and educational programs, cinema forms a space of human understanding.

Priority formats

  • "Year of Cinema of the Country" - digital seasons of national cinematography;
  • international retrospectives and thematic collections;
  • joint laboratories and script contests;
  • co-production markets and industry forums;
  • youth exchanges and film schools;
  • translation and digital restoration of culturally significant works;
  • partner programs with museums, archives, universities and TV channels.

7. Russia's role and entry point

For Russia, the project can become a tool for modern presentation of Russian and Soviet cinematographic heritage, support for new authors and the formation of an independent international cultural agenda. The strength of Russia is a combination of large-scale film archive, directorial school, literary tradition, theater, music and scientific culture.

8. Organizational model

ContourTask
Supervisory BoardStrategy, international representation, cultural policy.
the Film Expert CouncilContent quality, canon, archives, educational programs.
International CouncilNational representations, festivals, cultural institutions, co-production.
Editorial and curatorial teamsCollections, thematic seasons, personalities, publications.
Technology CenterPlatform, AI, search, recommendations, data security and digital infrastructure.
Academy SFERAEducation, laboratories, youth programs, advanced training.
Fund/programme officeGrants, partnerships, pilot projects and international programs.

9. Roadmap for launch

StageResultHorizon
Stage 1. Concept and coalitionFormation of the founding circle, expert council, brand architecture and international partners.0–3 months
Stage 2. MVP portalHome, catalog, countries, personalities, festival map, basic search and curatorial collections.3–6 months
Stage 3. Academy and film clubsEducational programs, online clubs, methodological materials, the first partner regions.6–12 months
Stage 4. SFERA AIMeaningful search, intellectual collections, translation, script and archival tools.9–18 months
Stage 5. International ScalingNational showcases, festival agreements, co-production programs and international seasons.12–24 months

10. Indicators of success

  • number of national cinematographs;
  • the volume of digitized and described cultural heritage;
  • number of partner film studios, festivals, schools, archives and universities;
  • number of active authors and co-production projects;
  • the number of educational institutions and film clubs in the network;
  • the share of content available with quality subtitles and translation;
  • number of international cultural programs and joint seasons;
  • engagement metrics that assess not only viewing, but also educational and cultural impact.

11. Basic structure of the site

Main • Films • Countries • Authors • Academy • Festivals • Cinema Clubs • Laboratory • Archive • Children • SFERA AI • For Partners • About the project

12. Text for main page

Cinema is the language in which humanity tells itself.

Through cinema, peoples preserve memory, transmit pain and hope, discover beauty, argue with the era and create images of the future.

SFERA is created as an international space of world cinema, where authors, spectators, schools, festivals, archives, studios and cultural institutions meet.

This is a portal for those who understand that cinema is not only an industry. Cinema is the power of the image. Cinema is the education of the look. Cinema is a diplomacy of culture. Cinema is a space where a person learns to see a person again.

13. Final formula

Other published revision: SFERA World_Cinema_Sphere_presentation.pptx · web text +

World Film Portal

A global cultural platform where cinema becomes the language of civilizations, a space of memory and a tool for creating the future.

CULTURE

KINO

EDUCATION

Cinema brings the world together.

Not another video service - the cultural infrastructure of world cinema

IDEA

SFERA connects content, people, institutions and technology into a single international ecosystem.

Language of Civilizations

Cultural Memory

Machine of the Future

Cinema shows how people see themselves, their history, their future and each other. SFERA turns the screen culture into an instrument of dialogue and mutual understanding.

Archives, classics, national schools, biographies and digital collections are assembled into a single navigational environment - accessible to the viewer, researcher and education.

Labs, pitching, co-productions, education, and AI are helping to create new movies and new cultural connections — not only to preserve the past.

The main principle

The platform should work not on keeping attention, but on human development.

Why "SFERA"

BRAND

The image of integrity: the planet, the screen, the viewer’s eye, the cultural dome and a single space of meanings.

Themes

Films

Unity

Development

Authors

System of Films, Unity, Development and Authorship

The brand formula helps to keep the humanitarian mission, industry function and technological architecture in one field.

What should SFERA do

MISSION

To create an international environment in which cinema preserves memory, develops human beings and connects cultures.

Saving

Promotion

Merger

Digitization and navigation on cultural heritage, archives and classics of world cinema.

Output of national cinemas and young authors to the international audience.

The connection of directors, screenwriters, actors, producers, festivals and spectators.

Education

Dialogue

Future

Cinema as a tool for education, cultural literacy and professional growth.

International cultural diplomacy and co-production.

Making films about man, science, the world and the images of the coming civilization.

The World Film Portal Ecosystem

ARCHITECTURE

One input is several interconnected contours: content, education, industry, communities, data, and international interaction.

World Film Archive

Festivals

Films • schools • heritage

Map • Events • Awards

SFERA

World Film Portal

National Cinema

Laboratory

Countries • studios • authors

Scripts • pitching • coproductions

Unified user profile and semantic navigation

Academy

SFERA AI

International Cultural Diplomacy

Training • workshops • children

Search • analysis • translation • recommendations

Film Archive of the World and National Cinematographs

CONTENT

Not a catalog for the sake of a catalog, but a civilization map of cinema: epochs, themes, schools, authors and contexts.

World Film Archive

Page of each country

• Russian and Soviet cinema

• European, Asian, Arabic, African and Latin American cinema

• Documentary and Animation

• family and children's movies

• films about war and peace

• copyright cinema

• films about man, science and the future

History of cinema • Key Directors • Studio • Festivals • Contemporary Authors • cooperation projects

Meaningful navigation

Search not only by genre and year, but by topics: dignity, family, war, peace, service, science, love, faith, growing up, choice, future.

Academy and Film Lab of the Future

DEVELOPMENT

SFERA simultaneously develops the viewer, the author and the project - from idea to international partnership.

Cinema Academy SFERA

The Future Film Laboratory

Scenario skills

Directing and Cinematography

Actors skills

Production and installation

Sound and Music

Film History and Film Criticism

Artificial Intelligence in Cinema

International film production

Children's Film Academy

The Bank of Scenario Ideas

Pitching Projects

International co-productions

Films about Russia and the peoples of the world

Films about science and technology

Films about heroes

Films about spiritual culture

Documentary expeditions

Projects for joint production

Festival map of the world and a network of film clubs

COMMUNICATIONS

Physical events and the digital platform should work as a single system for the dissemination of cultural ties.

Festivals

Cinema Clubs

Calendar • Geography • Applications • Awards • broadcasts • business programs

Schools • Universities • Libraries • Houses of Culture • Online Shows • Discussions

FESTIVAL

MAP OF PEACE

Professional network

International exchange

Directors • Actors • Screenwriters • Producers • Critics • Teachers

Joint film seasons • retrospectives • student exchange • co-productions

SFERA AI — intellectual layer of the portal

TECHNOLOGIES

AI does not replace the author: it helps to find, understand, translate, analyze and connect cultural contexts.

Meaningful Search

Translation and subtitles

Films on theme, values, era, conflict, hero image and cultural context.

Multilingualism for international access and cultural exchange.

Scenario analysis

Education Navigator

Structure, characters, drama risks, audience and production parameters.

Selection of films and programs for schools, universities, libraries and film clubs.

Archival navigation

Recommendations for value

Links between films, authors, eras, sources and historical events.

A model where cultural and educational significance is more important than the mechanics of attention retention.

Cinema as a soft power and space of international dialogue

CULTURAL DIPLOMATY

SFERA can become an infrastructure for the representation of national culture without the knowledge of culture for propaganda.

For the State

For the industry

For Peace

  • Cultural Sovereignty
  • promotion of national cinema
  • Children and Youth Cinema
  • International agreements
  • educational programs
  • Access to partners
  • Co-Production
  • Search for projects
  • Festival Network
  • New markets and audiences
  • Dialogue of cultures
  • Preservation of heritage
  • Translation of National Stories
  • Exchange of schools and authors
  • Co-production

Principle: to present Russia and other cultures through quality, depth and open cultural exchange.

For whom SFERA works

USERS

One platform is different use cases, from the viewer to the state and the film studio.

Viewers

Authors

Film Studios

Festivals

Open strong cinema and cultural routes.

Find training, partners, audience and production.

Look for scenarios, talents, co-products and markets.

Combine events, applications, programs and audiences.

Schools and Universities

States

Archives and museums

Children and youth

Use cinema in education and training.

Represent national culture and support exchange.

Digitize, link and bring back the legacy.

To form taste, cultural literacy and creative skills.

Organizational launch model

GOVERNANCE

The portal needs not only the editorial board, but a full-fledged system for managing content, partnerships, technologies and rights.

Strategic Council

Culture • Cinema • Education • International Cooperation

Platform Operator

Product • Edition • Technology • Data • Law • Finance

Expert Panels

Film Heritage • Education • Festivals • Children's Content • AI

Partner Network

Studio • Archives • Universities • Festivals • Museums • Countries • Funds

Key management principle: editorial independence + transparent selection criteria + technological scalability.

How to run SFERA

ROAD MAP

Start from the core of value and expand the platform as partners, rights and content emerge.

Concept and Consortium

MVP portal

Education and Clubs

International Network

Global Ecosystem

0–3 months

3–6 months

6–12 months

12–24 months

24+ months

mission • operator • partners • legal model

Archive • countries • personalities • festivals • basic AI-search

Academy • Film Clubs • School • Universities • Youth Programs

Co-Production • Festival Partnerships • National Sections

Multilingualism • API • large archives • joint production

First the kernel of meaning - then the scale

How to Measure Success

RESULT

Not just views: cultural influence, access to heritage, professional connections and international projects.

Digitized heritage

Geography

Education

films, collections, archives, personalities

countries, languages, national pages

courses, schools, universities, participants

Community

Production

Cultural effect

film clubs, festivals, authors, experts

pitching, co-productions, launched projects

availability of classics, international exchange, youth involvement

SFERA

Cinema brings the world together.

World Film Portal as a Cultural Infrastructure: Preserve Heritage, Develop Human Beings, Create New Films, and Connect Civilizations through Image.

Watch. Understand. Create. Merge.

World Film Portal — SFERA

Published files

Culture · Full published text

SUR: Culture and a New Order

Source Status: Primary Document

Culture is seen as a managed environment of values, behavior and long-term social development.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/sur-kultura-novyi-uklad

Open on the site
SUR Development Management SystemCULTURE system of meanings and reproductionNEW ORDER — a new standard of life, work and development

Version 1.0 · 29 August 2026

1. Executive summary

SUR considers culture not as a leisure industry, but as a basic infrastructure for human formation, public trust, the language of the future, the quality of decisions and the long-term sustainability of the state.

The “New Order” is neither a slogan nor a rejection of heritage. It is a transition to a model in which development is measured simultaneously through economic, social, cultural, educational, technological and environmental balances.

The cultural circuit SUR combines heritage, education, science, media, creativity, urban environment, family, work, digital platforms and public institutions into a single replicating cycle.

2. Formula of the New Order

HERITAGE → SYSL → KNOWLEDGE → ACTION → COOPERATION → RESULTS → NEW HERITAGE

The cycle must be closed: culture preserves and comprehends heritage, education translates meaning into competence, institutions turn competence into action, economics and governance create measurable results, and the result again becomes the legacy and standard of the next cycle.

3. Architecture of cultural contour SUR

ContourWhat unitesWhat we measure
1. Heritagearchives, museums, libraries, family and personal funds, academic registerspreservation, digital accessibility, proven provenance
2. Meaning and languagevalues, symbols, terminology, historical memory, cultural scenariospublic trust, semantic coherence, reduction of conflict
3. Educationschool, SPO, universities, mentoring, continuous learningcompetence, cultural literacy, ability to cooperate
4. Creativity and Mediacinema, music, literature, design, games, digital formatsshare of creative content, export of cultural products
5. The environment of lifearchitecture, cities, villages, parks, public spacesquality of the environment, participation of residents, local identity
6. Work and cooperationprofessions, crafts, entrepreneurship, cooperative modelsproductivity, quality of work, trust between participants
7. Institutions and lawstandards, funds, registers, expert councils, validationtransparency, continuity, reproducibility of decisions
8. Digital contourportals, digital twins, knowledge graphs, AI-helpersaccess to knowledge, data connectivity, personal development trajectories
9. Balancesperson, family, territory, industry, state, biosphereCoherence of goals and resources, early identification of imbalances

4. Balances of Culture and New Order

The key principle of SUR is that culture is governed not by the number of activities, but by a system of interrelated balances. Each balance has an object, metrics, allowable range, data sources, process owner, and correction scenario.

  • Balance Heritage and Renewal
  • Balancing unity and cultural diversity
  • Balance of rights and responsibilities
  • Balancing individual development and the public good
  • The balance of digital and live communication
  • Balance of work, free time and creativity
  • Center and Territory Balance
  • Balance of economy and cultural value
  • The balance of man and biosphere
  • The balance of memory about the past and the design of the future

5. Man as the Central Unit of the System

In the New Order, the main focus of development is neither an agency nor a digital platform, but a person within a network of relationships. SUR creates a personal development framework that is not reducible to a rating of the individual and does not restrict freedom of choice.

  • Health and vitality
  • Education and Competence
  • culture and ethics of interaction
  • Work and creative implementation
  • Family and Intergenerational Communication
  • Creativity and participation in public life
  • Environmental responsibility
  • Digital Literacy and Information Security
  • Ability to cooperate and resolve conflicts

6. The institutional model

InstituteFunction
Council for Cultural Development SURDefines goals, target balances, principles and priorities
Heritage Preservation Archivelong-term storage, origin, digitization and connectivity of cultural objects
Academic and cultural registersunified system of tested knowledge, personalities, schools, objects and methods
Funds systemfinancing of heritage, creativity, education, territorial and personal programs
Validation Centerschecking data, methods, effects and compliance with standards
Cultural laboratories of the territoriespilot projects for a new order in cities, villages, parks, schools and enterprises
Portal SUR / SFERAsingle point of access to knowledge, projects, events, funds, routes and results

7. Registers and digital model

The digital circuit is built as a federal system, not as a single monolithic base. Sources retain responsibility for the data; SUR provides identification, communications, origin, versions, access rights, and analytical representations.

  • the Register of Cultural Heritage Sites and Digital Copies
  • the Register of Personalities, Schools, Collectives and Succession
  • the Register of Cultural Practices and Techniques
  • Register of projects, events and infrastructure
  • Register of Funds and Sources of Funding
  • the Register of Cultural Balances
  • graph of meanings and connections between objects, people, territories and epochs

8. Cultural Economics: From Costs to Development Capital

Culture should be seen in the balance of state and territory as an asset. Not only cash revenues are subject to assessment, but also the accumulation of human, social, intellectual, reputational and territorial capital.

  • grants and budget funding for public goods and heritage
  • Trust funds and name funds for long-term missions
  • PPPs and concessional models for infrastructure
  • Creative economy for scalable cultural products
  • cooperative models for local communities and crafts
  • Social investments for measurable cultural and social effects

9. SUR New Order Index

A composite index is proposed, calculated not by one digit, but by a seven-dimensional profile. Inside each of the 5–15 verifiable indicators; the final index should not hide critical failures in certain areas.

MeasurementMeaning
C1 - Heritagepreservation, digitalization, use
C2 - Knowledgeaccess, quality, continuity of training
C3 — Trustsocial capital, participation, cooperation
C4 — Creativitycreation and distribution of cultural products
C5 — WednesdayQuality of public spaces and local identity
C6 - Human Developmentcompetence, activity, intergenerational communication
C7 - Balance with natureEcological Culture and Territory Impact

10. Pilots

A New Order territory: a municipality or agglomeration with a unified cultural and educational balance, a digital profile, a project laboratory and a development fund.

The School of the New Order: Integration of Place History, Science, Art, Labor, Nature, and Project Learning.

Enterprise as a cultural environment: corporate heritage, mentoring, quality culture, labor design, local social responsibility.

Archive of the future: digitization of heritage, family and personal funds, graph links, long-term storage and open educational scenarios.

Biocenosis and Territory Culture: Linking Natural Performance with Lifestyle, Land Use, Architecture, Tourism, and Education.

11. Road map 2026–2030

StageResult
0–3 monthsapproval of concepts, 7 index measurements, contour owners; inventory of existing registries and programs.
3–9 monthslaunch of a digital prototype and 2–3 territorial pilots; formation of the Council and validation centers.
9–18 monthsConsolidation of cultural, educational, social, environmental and economic data into a system of balances; launching a system of funds.
18–36 monthsscaling up best practices, interregional compatibility, a public New Order index.
up to 2030The transition from a set of cultural events to a continuous system of reproduction of human and cultural capital.

12. Control circuit

Management of the New Order should be interdepartmental. The Ministry of Culture is one of the key participants, but is not solely responsible for the outcome. The framework includes education and science, labour and social policy, digital development, economic development, natural resources, construction and housing and utilities, sport, tourism, regions, municipalities, and academic and civic institutions.

  • a single catalogue of goals and indicators
  • Interdepartmental Responsibility Matrix
  • related budgets and funds
  • cycle plan → data → analysis → solution → execution → effect evaluation
  • public reporting on the result, not only on the development of funds

13. Principles of the New Order

  1. Continuity without dogmatism
  2. Development without destruction of heritage
  3. Unity without unification of cultures
  4. Technology without depersonalization
  5. Economics as a means of human development and environment
  6. Freedom of creativity combined with responsibility for social impact
  7. Data for understanding, not for total control
  8. Solutions at the level closest to the person while maintaining common standards
  9. Balance of man, society, state and biosphere

14. Target image

The New Order is a culture that knows how to preserve the past, understand the present and jointly design the future.

For SUR, culture becomes not a service function, but a system of reproduction of the quality of society. The main criterion for success is the ability of a person, family, territory and state to develop without destroying ties, memory, nature and future opportunities.

Other published edition: SUR SUR_Culture_New_Contribution.pptx · Web Text +

CULTURE · NEW ORDER

Culture as an infrastructure of meanings, human reproduction and development management

SUR

CULTURE

NEW ORDER

Development management system

Meanings, heritage, knowledge, creativity

A new norm of life, work and cooperation

Version 1.0 · 29 August 2026

Main idea

Culture is not a branch of events, but the basic system of reproduction of society.

  • SUR moves culture from the departmental sector to the inter-system contour of development management.
  • The main object is a person in relationships: family, territory, education, work, creativity, nature, the state.
  • The main tool is interrelated balances, not a single rating or set of KPI.
  • The main result is society’s ability to renew itself without destroying heritage, trust and future opportunities.

New Order = continuity + development + cooperation + measurable social impact

Cycle of the New Order

A closed circuit of reproduction of cultural and human capital.

HERITAGE

MEANING

KNOWLEDGE

ACTION

COOPERATION

RESULT

NEW HERITAGE

Culture preserves and comprehends → education translates into competence → institutions organize action → economics and management create result → result becomes the legacy of the next cycle.

9 contours of cultural architecture SUR

Heritage

Meaning and language

Education

archives, museums, foundations

values, memory, symbols

school, universities, mentoring

Creativity and Media

Living environment

Work and cooperation

cinema, music, literature, games

cities, villages, parks, architecture

professions, crafts, enterprises

Institutions and law

Digital framework

Balances

standards, funds, validation

registers, knowledge graph, AI

person, territory, state, biosphere

We manage not activities, but balances

Legacy ↔ updated

Unity ↔ Diversity

Rights ↔ liability

Personal development ↔ Public benefit

Digital ↔ live communication

Work ↔ creativity and free time

Center ↔

Economic ↔ cultural value

Human ↔ Biosphere

Each Balance: Object → indicators → Permissible range → Data sources → Owner → Correction scenario

Man is the central unit of the system

Education

Health

Family

HUMANITY

the Communication System

Digital literacy

Work

Cooperation

Creativity

Nature

The institutional model

Council for Cultural Development

Goals, priorities, target balances

Heritage Preservation Archive

Long-term storage and origin

Academic and cultural registers

Tested knowledge, personalities, schools

Funds system

Long-term funding for missions

Validation Centers

checking data, methods and effects

Cultural laboratories of the territories

pilots in cities, villages, schools, enterprises

Portal SUR / SFERA

Unified access to knowledge, projects and results

The digital circuit: a federal model, not a monolith

SOURCES

SUR CORE

SERVICES

Museums · Archives · Library · Universities · regions · Funds · Institutions

Identification · Origin · Version · Communications · Permissions

knowledge graph · analytics · AI assistants · personal routes

• heritage and digital copies

• Funds and financing

• Personalities and Succession Schools

• indicators of cultural balance

• cultural practices and techniques

• meanings and connections graph

• projects, events and infrastructure

Cultural Economics: From Expenditure to Capital Development

Human capital

Social capital

Intellectual Capital

competence, health, creativity

trust, participation, cooperation

knowledge, schools, methods, law

Reputation capital

Territorial capital

Natural capital

image of the country, territory, organization

environment, identity, attractiveness

Environmental Culture and Quality of Environment

Tools: Budget · Grants · Name Funds · PPP · creative economy · Cooperatives · Social investments

SUR New Order Index

Not one number, but a profile of seven dimensions.

Heritage

Knowledge

Trust

Creativity

Environment

Human development

Balance with nature

The principle of protection against "average temperature": critical failure on one dimension can not be hidden by a high overall average.

New Order Pilots

Territory

School

cultural and educational balance + digital passport + development fund

place history + science + art + labor + nature + project training

Company

Archive of the future

Mentoring + Quality Culture + Corporate Heritage

family and personal funds + graph links + long-term storage

Biocenosis and culture

natural indicators + way of life + architecture + tourism + education

Road map 2026–2030

concepts · 7 measurements · owners · inventory

0–3 months

Digital Prototype · 2–3 Pilot · Board · Validation

3–9 months

balance system · stock circuit · interagency data

9–18 months

scaling · compatibility of regions · public index

18–36 months

continuous system of reproduction of cultural and human capital

to 2030

The Management Contour - Interdepartmental

GOALS AND BALANCES

RESPONSIBILITY

RESOURCES

a single catalog of goals, indicators and allowable ranges

matrix of departments, regions, institutes and data owners

Related budgets, funds, infrastructure and competencies

PLAN → DATA → ANALYSIS → DECISION → EXECUTIVE → EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT

Reporting should answer not only the question “how much is mastered”, but above all “what balance has changed and what social quality is created”.

9 Principles of the New Order

Continuity without dogmatism

Development without destruction of heritage

Unity without unification of cultures

Technology without depersonalization

Economics as a means of human development

Freedom of creativity + responsibility

Data for understanding, not total control

Solutions closer to person + common standards

Balance of man, society, state and biosphere

NEW ORDER

A culture that knows how to preserve the past, understand the present and jointly design the future.

The success criterion SUR: the development of man, family, territory and state without the destruction of connections, memory, nature and future opportunities.

Published files

Culture · Full published text

People, Culture and Global Balances

Source Status: Primary Document

The material considers culture and human development as a distinct part of global equilibrium.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/chelovek-kultura-i-mirovye-balansy

Open on the site

Sustainability Development

A person's measure of resultCULTURE Mechanism of ConnectivityBALANCE - control circuit
STATUSDraft methodological report for expert and management testing. It is not an approved standard or internationally recognized index.

Version 1.0 • 27 August 2026

​

Document content and logic

From diagnosis to managed decision cycle

SectionTopicResult
1Management summaryWhat is proposed and why
2World situationEvidence of Linkages of Imbalances
3Basic conceptsPeople, Culture and Dynamic Balance
4Architecture 19 Balancesfive groups and five levels of review
5Causal modelgain loops, cascades and weak links
6Measurementfrom open panel to experimental index
7Control circuitdata, decisions, participation, financing, implementation
8Pilot and Scaling12- and 24-month routes
9Limitations and protectionevidence, rights, privacy, independent verification
10Decisionsmandate, customer, territory and transition criteria
KEYThe document distinguishes between data [D], calculations [R], scenarios [C], expert assessments [E] and normative proposals [H]. This prevents the observed, calculated and desired from being mixed.

​

1 Management summary

Common language for decisions affecting people, culture and world systems

Today’s crises rarely remain within the same industry. Water scarcity changes health, migration and trust; educational exclusion reduces innovation and reinforces inequality; loss of cultural connectivity accelerates polarization and makes institutions less capable. Industry indicators are important, but do not show the price of the solution for the whole system.

TEZISMan is the subject, the bearer of dignity and the ultimate recipient of development results; culture is the system of reproduction of values, knowledge, norms, trust and creative practices; world balances are the dynamic coordination of needs, resources, opportunities, risks and responsibilities between generations, territories and states.

Suggested:

  1. adopt 19 balances as a project classifier for diagnostics and interagency dialogue, rather than as a ready international standard;
  2. at the first stage to publish the panel and vector 19 × 5, maintaining the distinctiveness of balance sheets, territories and social groups;
  3. Build causal models and scenarios around decisions, not around rankings
  4. use the experimental integral index only as an additional signal with protection against compensation of weak links;
  5. launch a territorial pilot with scientific verification, participation of citizens and predefined scaling criteria.

Expected management result:

  • a single map of the consequences of the decision before the start of financing;
  • early detection of cascading risks and critical thresholds;
  • coordination of departmental, territorial and public goals;
  • linking resources to verifiable results for humans and the environment;
  • accumulation of institutional memory: why the decision was made, on what data and with what effect.
NOT OFFEREDUnify cultures; replace political choice with a single formula; declare correlations to be causal; assign resource status to a person; hide conflicts of interest by average score.

​

2 World situation: imbalances are already linked

Signals of different systems converge on the quality and sustainability of human life

Below are comparable signals from official international sources. They do not form a single causal model and belong to different periods of observation. Their task is to show the scale and interconnectedness of the problems that industry monitoring considers separately.

SphereGlobal signal [D]PeriodSource
Culture93% reporting States recognize culture in sustainable development plans; cultural and creative industries are estimated at 3,39% global GDP and 3,55% employment; only 9% cultural professionals consider socio-economic protection sufficient2019–2024[1]
Education272 million children and young people are estimated to have remained out of school2025[4]
Mental healthNearly one in seven people 1,1 billion — Living with a mental disorder2021[5]
Water and sanitation2,1 billion People did not have a safe drinking water supply; 3,4 billion — Safely Managed Sanitation2024[6]
Digital connectivity6 billion People were online, 2,2 billion — Stayed offline2025[7]
ResourcesNatural resource extraction has tripled in five decades and could grow by another 60% by 2060 at current trends.Rating 2024[8]
ClimateThe current policy trajectory is estimated at 2,8 °C warming for a centuryRating 2025[9]
Forced displacementby the sum of categories UNHCR — about 117,8 million people by the end of the year; approximately one of 70 inhabitants of the planetEnd 2025[10]
Nutrition645 Millions of people faced with hunger; a healthy diet was economically inaccessible 2,7 billion2025[11]
CONCLUSION [E]Gaps are not linear. They reinforce each other through health, trust, education, migration, the cost of capital, security, and the ability of institutions to act.

​

2.1 Why Industry Management is Not Enough

Office optimization can transfer costs to another system or generation

DecisionLocal TargetOften invisible transfersCheck required
The Energy Projectavailability and reliabilityland, water, health, cultural landscape, financial dependenceimpact passport on 19 balances before solution
Digital platformspeed and scale of servicesprivacy, autonomy, digital exclusion, attention, technological dependenceassessment of rights, accessibility, security and human control
Urban renovationfund renewal and land valuedisplacement of residents, loss of memory space, increased travel time, destruction of neighborhood networksA territorial scenario involving communities
Educational reformTest results and savingsinequality of access, overload, narrowing of culture and creativity, outflow of personnelbalance of competences, well-being, culture and territories
Environmental limitationReducing pressure on the ecosystememployment, income, food, trust in the fairness of the transitioncompensation package and transition sequence

Principle of Precaution:

If the exposure affects a critical threshold of at least one balance, the average positive rating does not eliminate the need to review the decision. Balance management does not prohibit trade-offs; it makes them visible, explainable, and bounded by red lines.

​

3 Basic concepts

Three supports of the framework and the limits of their use

HUMANITYNot a management object or a production resource. A person is a subject of law and action, the bearer of dignity, culture, relationships and the ability to create. The criterion of the result is the expansion of real opportunities to live, understand, participate and create.
CULTURENot just the art and heritage industry. It is an environment for reproducing meanings, language, norms, trust, memory, imagination, skill, and collaborative practices. It is simultaneously an independent balance sheet and a through regulator of the remaining eighteen.
WORLD BALANCENot static equality and not the absence of conflict. It is a dynamic safe corridor where the system is able to meet needs, recover from shocks and not transfer unacceptable costs to other groups, territories and generations.

Through Measurements

  • intergenerational justice: who gets the benefits, risks and irreversible losses;
  • territorial justice: what differences hide the average value;
  • dignity and rights: what decisions are unacceptable regardless of the benefit;
  • stability: how much the system withstands shocks and restores functions;
  • Creativity: Whether the solution creates new abilities, connections, and public goods.
BORDERCultural diversity is a condition for the viability of the framework. It does not set a single scale of identities and does not replace public choice with an expert formula.

​

3.1 Five Levels of Consideration

The same balance manifests itself on different scales and requires agreed solutions

LevelScaleWhat we observeType of solutions
1Identityhealth, knowledge, dignity, time, ability to chooseIndividual trajectories and accessibility
2Family and communitycare, trust, cultural transmission, mutual assistanceSocial infrastructure and participation
3Territory and Instituteservices, environment, economy, ecosystems, managementproject solutions and budgets
4State and Civilizational Spacerules, sovereignty, redistribution, strategyNational policies and regulations
5Planet and inter-civilizational relationscommon borders, peace, exchange, global public goodsagreements, cooperation and mutual responsibility

For each of 19 The balance sheet is a matrix 5 levels. This allows you to see, for example, how the deterioration of personal mental well-being is associated with the information environment, territorial availability of assistance, national policies and global technological platforms.

​

4 Architecture 19 Balances

Proposed classifier for diagnostics, scenarios and decision coordination

The classifier combines 19 interdependent balances into five groups. It is a normative-analytical proposal [N], which should undergo scientific, legal, cultural and territorial validation. Numbering does not mean hierarchy of importance.

№GroupFunctionComposition
1–4I. ManDevelopment outcomes reflected in human capabilities.Generations and demographic reproduction; Health and active healthy life; Knowledge, education and competence; Work, income and personal time
5–8II. Culture and societyMechanisms of semantic coherence, trust and joint action.Values, identity and historical memory; Trust, solidarity and participation; Equity, equality of opportunity and mobility; Information, attention and meanings
9–12III. Nature and TerritoryEnvironmental and spatial conditions of present and future generations.Biosphere, climate and biodiversity; Availability and quality of water; Soil, food and bioproductivity; Resettlement, mobility and territorial connectivity
13–16IV. Economics and technologyReproduction of goods without transfer of costs on the person, nature and future.Production, consumption and circulation; Energy, materials and resource efficiency; Finance, investment and long horizon; Science, technology and digital sovereignty
17–19V. State and PeaceInstitutions, security and international rules that keep the system from collapsing.Institutions, law and quality of management; Integrated security and sovereignty; International Exchange, Cooperation and Peace
SQUARE REGULATORCulture is present in every group: shaping attitudes towards health and work, rules and justice, nature and consumption, knowledge and technology, safety and peace.

​

4.1 Person

Development outcomes reflected in human capabilities.

BalanceResult for manReference indicatorsThe Cultural MechanismThe Red Line
1. Generations and demographic reproductionThe ability to create a family and raise children without loss of dignity and prospectstotal fertility; life expectancy; migration balance; generation gapFamily culture, care and responsibilitylong compression of the age pyramid; rupture of the care infrastructure
2. Health and active healthy lifePhysical and mental well-being throughout lifehealthy life expectancy; preventable mortality; access to care; mental healthculture of prevention, physicality and mutual assistancefalling basic availability of care; rising preventable mortality
3. Knowledge, education and competenceThe ability to understand the world, learn and actEducation coverage and outcomes; functional literacy; access to culture and science; adult educationCulture of Knowledge and MentoringSustainable exclusion of groups from education; degradation of basic skills
4. Work, income and personal timeDecent work, sufficient income and time for family, culture and developmentDecent employment; median disposable income; debt burden; work-time balanceculture of work, craftsmanship and cooperationworking poverty; chronic overload and lack of time for reproduction

The principle of interpretation

Demographics, health, education and work are considered together: the growth of one indicator is not considered a success if it is provided by overload, exclusion or deterioration of life prospects of other groups.

VERIFICATION OF THE DECISIONFor the "Man" group, the following are fixed: initial state [D], impact model [R], alternative scenarios [C], expert disagreements [E] and the selected regulatory corridor [H].

​

4.2 Culture and society

Mechanisms of semantic coherence, trust and joint action.

BalanceResult for manReference indicatorsThe Cultural MechanismThe Red Line
5. Values, Identity and Historical MemoryThe living connection of a person with a heritage and the ability to create a newparticipation in culture; preservation of heritage; cultural diversity; intergenerational transmissionThe Object Area of Balancedestruction of heritage; forcible exclusion of identities
6. Trust, solidarity and participationWillingness to cooperate, help and influence the common causeinterpersonal and institutional trust; participation; volunteering; community densityCulture of dialogue and participationbreakdown of basic cooperation; normalization of violence
7. Equity, equality of opportunity and mobilityA real opportunity to change the life trajectoryintergenerational mobility; access to services; inequality; discriminatory gapsculture of dignity, law and mutual recognitionInherited exclusion; systemic discrimination
8. Information, attention and meaningsInformation environment that supports independent thinkingMedia literacy; diversity of sources; digital well-being; disinformation and polarizationCulture of critical thinking and responsible communicationmass manipulation; destruction of the ability to share a fact

The principle of interpretation

Cultural cohesion is not equal to uniformity. Managed balance supports diversity, shared language of facts, nonviolent conflict, and the capacity for collective action.

VERIFICATION OF THE DECISIONFor the Culture and Society group, the following are fixed: initial state [D], impact model [R], alternative scenarios [C], expert differences [E] and the selected regulatory corridor [H].

​

4.3 Nature and territory

Environmental and spatial conditions of present and future generations.

BalanceResult for manReference indicatorsThe Cultural MechanismThe Red Line
9. Biosphere, climate and biodiversityA safe ecological corridor and the ability of ecosystems to recoveremissions; climate risk; ecosystem status; proportion of reconstituted areasCulture of Nature ProportionalityCrossing of local environmental limits; irreversible loss of ecosystem functions
10. Water availability and qualityReliable and equitable access to safe waterwater supply; quality; loss; access to safe services; pool stressCulture of careful water useunsafe water; chronic excess of the reproduced fence
11. Soil, food and bio-productivityHealthy eating while maintaining the fertility and sustainability of agricultural systemsavailability of a healthy diet; soil quality; food loss; yield stabilityCulture of food and agriculturefamine; soil degradation below recovery threshold
12. Resettlement, mobility and territorial connectivityAccess to opportunities regardless of place of residenceavailability time; transport connectivity; quality of environment; spatial segregationculture of place, neighborhood and routesTerritorial isolation; inaccessibility of basic services

The principle of interpretation

Natural systems set biophysical limits, and the territorial organization determines who gets access to the benefits and who bears the environmental burden.

VERIFICATION OF THE DECISIONFor the Nature and Territory group, the following are fixed: initial state [D], impact model [R], alternative scenarios [C], expert differences [E] and the selected regulatory corridor [H].

​

4.4 Economics and Technology

Reproduction of goods without transfer of costs on the person, nature and future.

BalanceResult for manReference indicatorsThe Cultural MechanismThe Red Line
13. Production, consumption and circulationMeeting needs while minimizing waste and hidden costsresource intensity; maintainability; reuse; material footprint; wasteculture of quality, sufficiency and repairgrowth of the material footprint with deterioration of the quality of life; toxic flows
14. Energy, materials and resource efficiencyReliable supply within environmental and technological safetyenergy intensity; share of clean energy; critical materials; loss; grid stabilityCulture of Energy Responsibilitystructural deficit; dangerous dependence without reserves and substitution
15. Finance, Investment and the Long HorizonCapital that supports viability, not short-term recoveryshare of long-term investments; cost of capital; sustainability of debt; accounting for external effectsA culture of responsible ownershipFinancial fragility; systematic underfunding of public goods
16. Science, technology and digital sovereigntyTechnologies that expand human abilities and are managed by societyR&D; access to infrastructure; data security; technological diversification; diffusion of innovationCulture Research and Ethics TechnologyLoss of control over critical infrastructure; discrimination against algorithms

The principle of interpretation

Economic and technological progress is measured by whether it expands human abilities while reducing the material footprint, the risks of dependence and the transfer of costs to the future.

VERIFICATION OF THE DECISIONFor the Economics and Technology group, the following are fixed: baseline [D], exposure model [R], alternative scenarios [C], expert differences [E] and the selected regulatory corridor [H].

​

4.5 State and Peace

Institutions, security and international rules that keep the system from collapsing.

BalanceResult for manReference indicatorsThe Cultural MechanismThe Red Line
17. Institutions, law and quality of managementPredictable rules, dignity protection and ability to implement decisionsquality of services; rights observance; execution of decisions; openness; feedbackA culture of service, legitimacy and evidencearbitrariness; loss of basic capacity of institutions
18. Integrated security and sovereigntyHuman security and continuity of vital functionsrisks to life; sustainability of infrastructures; preparedness; cyber and biosecurity; trust in protectionA culture of readiness without the militarization of everyday lifeMass threat to life; failure of critical systems
19. International Exchange, Cooperation and PeaceThe opportunity to develop through exchange without dependence, coercion and warconflict; humanitarian flows; knowledge sharing; contractual capacity; mutual sustainability of chainsa culture of peace and inter-civilizational respectwar and mass displacement; breaking vital exchanges

The principle of interpretation

Without functioning institutions, comprehensive security and international contractual capacity, the balance sheets remain unprotected. Security is limited by human rights and dignity.

VERIFICATION OF THE DECISIONFor the State and Peace group, the following are fixed: initial state [D], impact model [R], alternative scenarios [C], expert disagreements [E] and the selected regulatory corridor [H].

​

5 Causal model and cascades

It is necessary to manage not separate values, but feedback loops

Creative Loops

Launching mechanismStep 2Step 3Step 4Step 5Return
Cultural participationbelonging and meaningTrustCo-operationQuality of InstitutionsSuccessful joint projects
Culture of knowledgeEducationscience and technologyProductivityResources for public goodshealth, culture and education
Ecological cultureconsumption and productionResource EfficiencyRestoration of ecosystemsHealth and FoodLong horizon

Destructive Loop

CASCADEInequality and Loss of Prospects → Distrust → Polarization → Dehumanization → conflict → Destruction of institutions and infrastructure → New Inequality.

Rules of causal analysis

  • Distinguish between correlation, mechanism and proven causality;
  • fix time lags: cultural and demographic effects often manifest themselves later than the budget cycle;
  • check the heterogeneity of the effect by groups and territories;
  • model feedbacks, thresholds, irreversibility and the possibility of adaptation;
  • Compare not only the main scenario, but also a realistic alternative without intervention.

​

5.1 How a local deficit becomes systemic

Examples of early warning chains

TriggerInitial DeficitPrimary transferSocial impactSystemic riskResponse Package
WaterIncreased water stressDecrease in yield and price increaseDeterioration of health and migrationSocial tensions and fiscal spendingwater saving + agricultural transition + protection vulnerable
Warningpolarizing information environmentAnxiety and loss of general factDecreased trust and participationPoor enforcement of decisionsMedia Literacy + Design Platforms + cultural dialogue
Educationterritorial gapYoung people and staff shortagesnarrowing the tax baseservices degradation and new exclusionNetwork Schools + Culture + Digital Access + Mentoring
Cultural heritageLoss of space and memoryweakening of identity and tourismDecreased confidence in developmentConflict over investmentcommunity participation + adaptive use + effect contract

These chains are hypotheses [E/C], not universal laws. In the pilot, each chain is translated into a map of causal assumptions, verifiable data, and events that can disprove the model.

​

6 Measurement: from panel to index

Transparency is more important than the attractiveness of one number

The basic product should be an open panel of 19 balances on five levels. It shows direction, gaps, uncertainty, and sources. A one-value roll is acceptable only after the pilot and should not be used on its own for resource allocation or sanctions.

ORDER1) Data and metadata → 2) Normalization → 3) Balance within the topic → 4) Adjustment for Inequality → 5) weak link → 6) Cascading risk → 7) scenario and solution.

Proposed formal scheme [N]

ElementFormula / Rule
Normalizationsᵦⱼ ∈ [0;1] with clear thresholds, direction and uncertainty interval
Thematic balanceBᵦ = 100 × ∏ max(ε, sᵦⱼ)ʷᵦⱼ
Inequality adjustmentB*ᵦ = Bᵦ × (1 − γDᵦ), where Dᵦ — territorial/group gap
Geometric convolutionG = ∏ (B*ᵦ / 100)ᵛᵦ
Weak linkM = min(B*ᵦ / 100)
Experimental IndexI = 100 × G¹⁻ˡ × Mˡ × (1 − ρR), where R is cascading risk

Geometric aggregation limits the total compensation of a weak result to strong values. Parameter λ enhances the weight of the weak link; for the pilot, you can test the range 0,15–0,30. Parameters γ, ρ and w, v weights are determined by an open sensitivity procedure and cannot be assigned covertly.

RED LINECrossing the critical threshold for rights, life, basic services or irreversible environmental damage means a critical imbalance regardless of the final average.

​

6.1 Thresholds and uncertainty

The scale is a tool for discussion, not a substitute for a meaningful conclusion

Range [N]StateInterpretation
80–100Creative Sustainabilitybalance is in a safe corridor and creates a stock of adaptation
65–79Managed stabilitybasic functions are stable, but there are vulnerable groups or external risks
50–64Tensiondeterioration is stable, corrective package and enhanced monitoring is required
35–49Systemic riskdeficit is transferred between balance sheets, cascading is likely
0–34Critical gapbasic function broken or crossed red line

Obligatory assessment support

  • uncertainty interval and data quality;
  • dynamics for at least several periods;
  • distribution by territories and significant groups;
  • explanation of the reasons for the change and alternative interpretations;
  • Register of crossed red lines and open disagreements.

​

6.2 Balance passport

Minimum evidentiary management unit

Example:Balance No. 6 "Trust, solidarity and participation" - the demonstration structure of the passport, not the calculation of the territory.
FieldContents
Goalsupport people’s ability to cooperate, participate and resolve conflicts non-violently
Result for mana sense of belonging, security, influence and the ability to count on others
Data [D]trust surveys; participation in elections and discussions; volunteering; community density; treatment and performance
Cutsage, gender, income, territory, type of settlement, vulnerability, digital access
Mechanisms [E]quality of services; fairness of procedures; cultural participation; experience of successful cooperation; information environment
Red Line [N]normalization of violence, exclusion of groups from participation, loss of minimum procedural fairness
Early Signala sharp increase in mutual distrust simultaneously with a decline in participation and local conflicts
Decisionpackage of open procedures, local cultural sites, service improvements and mediation
Effect checkchange in indicators relative to comparable territory/period; qualitative evidence; audit of side effects
Responsibilitydata owner; decision owner; independent verifier; public council

The passport connects the indicator and the action. Without the decision maker, the indicator remains an observation; without an independent review, the management result remains a statement.

​

7 Data and early warning

From scattered statistics to an explainable observation circuit

LayerPurpose
1. Rostersources, legal grounds, frequency, owner, quality, restrictions
2. Observing layerofficial statistics, administrative data, surveys, sensors, expert and public signals
3. Semantic modelcommon definitions, links of indicators with balance sheets, levels and groups
4. Analyticstrends, breaks, causal hypotheses, thresholds, scenarios, sensitivity
5. Early warningcombination of signals, cascade assessment, priority checks and actions
6. Solution and feedbackselected package, budget, responsible, expected effect, monitoring and revision

Data quality rules

  • minimization of personal data and separation of identification and analytics;
  • versioning of methods and reproducibility of calculations;
  • explicit marking of omissions, model estimates and conflicting sources;
  • the impossibility of an automatic decision affecting rights without human consideration;
  • public metadata and independent auditing for high impact indicators.
PRINCIPLEThe higher the price of error for a person, the stricter the requirements for explanatory, legal basis, independent verification and the possibility of appeal.

​

7.1 Management decision cycle

Data becomes valuable only within the process of choice and responsibility

StageKey issueObligatory result
DiagnosticsWhat is the balance of the corridor and for whombase line; gap map; data quality
Causal hypothesisWhat mechanisms and lags explain the changeMap of causes; alternatives; rebuttable assumptions
ScriptsWhat happens with different packages and without actionranges; cascades; irreversibility; wait price
Harmonizationwhose values, rights and knowledge must be taken into accountprotocol of participation; disagreements; compensation
Result contractWho, by what and what effect goesresources; KPI; red lines; verification
ImplementationHow to Manage Adaptivelycontrol points; monitoring; right to stop
Assessment and trainingWhat worked, for whom and whyeffect; side effects; updated model

The cycle repeats. Management maturity is expressed not in the absence of revision, but in the ability to change the decision in a timely manner based on new information and maintain an understandable history of choice.

​

7.2 Implementation ecosystem

Separation of monitoring, participation, financing and execution

ContourRoleProductsLimitations
EQUILIBRIUMobservation, modeling, forecasting and controlbalance sheets passports; causal cards; scenarios; early warnings; decision logmethodological openness and independent verification
SFERADialogue, participation and initiationstakeholder map; public signals; project initiatives; protocol disagreementsrepresentativeness, accessibility, protection against capture
ECO-PPAMobilization of resources and contracting resultsfinancial model; risk allocation; measurable effect contract; long horizonprevent monetization of rights and hidden transfer of costs
SPECZASHCHITAcooperation, implementation and confirmed effectexecution plan; protection of critical functions; quality control; proof of resultproportionality, law, security and accountability
SECTION OF ROLESThe operator of the analysis should not single-handedly determine the normative choice; the participants in the dialogue should assume representativeness; the financing contour should replace the social goal with profitability; the executor should confirm its effect.

​

7.3 Methodology management

Legitimacy is created by procedure, not complexity of the model.

RoleSubject of responsibilityInstitutional protection
Customermandate, objectives, territory, access to dataapproves the pilot and is responsible for the use of the results
Scientific and methodological operatorclassifier, indicators, models, sensitivityPublish methodology and restrictions
Human Rights and Ethics Councildignity, non-discrimination, privacy, appealhas the right to stop high-risk use
Cultural and Public Councilvalues, memory, diversity, local knowledgeIt captures positions and disagreements, without replacing the whole society.
Data Ownersquality, legality, periodicity, safetySign the passport of each source
Performers of pilotsproject packages and operational resultsDo not make a single impact assessment
Independent Verifierreproducibility, effect, side effectsPublish an opinion before scaling decision

Transparency

  • open catalog of indicators and changes in methodology;
  • register of conflicts of interest and sources of funding;
  • publication of alternative models and sensitivity of results;
  • the right of the territory and groups to reply and correct data;
  • Duration of the model: mandatory revision after the change of conditions.

​

8 Pilot packages

You need to check the frame on real solutions, not only on retrospective data

PackageGoalRelated Balance SheetsVerified result
Family - Culture - DemographySupport for family resilience and intergenerational transmission1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 12, 15, 17change in availability, time, trust and life plans
School - Culture - Cognitive Sustainabilityeducational environment connecting knowledge, art and media literacy2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 16, 17learning, well-being, participation, ability to distinguish information
Urban environment - culture - cohesionspace renewal without displacement and loss of memory space5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17Accessibility, Neighbourhood Relations, Security and Participation
Cultural Landscape — Nature — HealthRestoration of the territory through heritage and natural solutions2, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15environmental impact, health, employment and identity
Dialogue — Information — Securityreducing polarization and improving crisis preparedness6, 7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19trust, quality of information, participation and sustainability of functions

The choice of the pilot is made according to five criteria: the presence of a responsible customer; a real solution and budget; a sufficient baseline; the possibility of comparison; social significance with managed risk.

​

8.1 Road map for 24 months

The first 12 months give a working prototype, the next 12 - proof of effect and scalability

MonthsStageMain worksControl product
0–2Mandate and boundariescustomer; territory; goals; legal and ethical contourApproved Pilot Passport
3–5Methodology19 balance sheets; indicators; sources; red lines; participationversion 0.8 of the classifier and data register
6–8Base Linecollection and verification; break map; data qualitypanel 19 × 5 with intervals of uncertainty
9–11Causal modelhypotheses; scenarios; cascades; sensitivityScripting and Pilot Design
12–17Implementationproject packages; result contracts; monitoringfirst operational effects and solution log
18–21Evaluationcomparison; quality verification; side effects; auditindependent opinion
22–24Scalingupdating the methodology; institutionalization; exchangedecision to scale or stop
12 MONTHThe minimum result of the first phase: an open methodology, a basic panel, a causal model, three scenarios, one or two running packages and an independent readiness check.

​

9 Application risks and protection measures

The main threat is to turn a living system into an opaque rating

RiskHow it manifests itselfProtection
False accuracyThe index looks more objective than the data and assumptionsintervals, sensitivity, marking [D/P/C/E/H]
Compensation for weak linksHigh values hide critical gapgeometric convolution, minimum M, red lines
Cultural Unificationone scale suppresses differencesmultiple qualitative evidence, local validation, right to dissent
Surveillance and discriminationDetailed data is used against peopledata minimization, legal basis, audit, appeal
Capture of participationActive group declares itself the voice of allrepresentation map, access quotas, open protocol
Politicalization of the modelparameters are adjusted to the desired resultversioning, independent verifier, publication of alternatives
Substitution of solution by monitoringpanel exists without action ownerbinding result contract and responsible
External dependencyCritical data and models are unavailable or unmanagedopen formats, local competencies, reservations
ETHIC MINIMUMNo automated confinement may single-handedly restrict a person’s right, access to a basic service or freedom. We need a human review, explanation and the possibility of appeal.

​

9.1 What and how to validate

The mature framework withstands a meaningful, causal and ethical test

Type of verificationQuestionMethods
ContentiveDo the indicators really reflect the balance?expert panels, cultural and territorial inspection
ConstructiveAre indicators related to close and different concepts?statistical tests, alternative specifications
CausalDoes the model explain the change mechanismquasi-experiments, natural experiments, process-trace
PrognosticHow early signals predict eventsRetrospective testing and subsequent verification
ManagementDoes the frame improve the quality of the solutionComparison of Decision Cycles and Reaction Time
Ethicalwhether its use causes unacceptable harmAudit of rights, privacy, discrimination and appeal opportunities
ExternalTransferring conclusions between territoriesRepetition of pilots, explicit description of context and boundaries

The decision to scale is made only after the publication of both positive and negative results of the pilot. A failed hypothesis is a useful result if it allows you to change the model to a high-risk application.

​

9.2 International and intercultural applicability

Common grammar of problems without a single mandatory picture of the world

The framework can support international exchange if used as a question matching language rather than a ranking of cultures and states. UNESCO sees culture as a global public good and increasingly places it at the centre of sustainable development2; 3]. UNDP Stresses that the criterion of progress is human opportunity, not economic growth per se12; 13].

Principles of cooperation

  • Universal dignity, rights and prohibition of unacceptable harm; specific cultural expressions are diverse;
  • comparison of definitions, sources and directions of dynamics, and not only the final places;
  • each party retains control over critical data and participates in interpretation;
  • Exchange should create mutual abilities, not unilateral dependence;
  • Peace and contractability are an independent result, not an external condition of the model.
FORMATAn international network of pilots can publish a common minimum set of metadata, local sets of indicators, and joint studies of causal mechanisms without being forced to a single integral index.

​

10 Launch Solutions

Transition from a concept to a program to be tested

  1. Approve the frame "Man. Culture and World Balances” in the status of the research and development program, rather than a normative rating.
  2. Determine the customer, one pilot area and one or two specific project packages with an existing budget and responsible.
  3. Approve the draft classifier 19 balances and the procedure for its cultural, legal and scientific validation.
  4. Provide legal access to data, assign owners and approve privacy rules, versioning and publishing metadata.
  5. To form a scientific and methodological operator, a council for rights and ethics, a cultural and public council and independent verification.
  6. Approve control products 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, including the right to stop the pilot when crossing the red line.
  7. Make a decision to scale only based on the results of an independent assessment of the effect and side effects.

Criteria for readiness for start

ConditionMinimum Confirmation
Mandatehas a decision owner and formally defined boundaries
Datadefined minimum set, owners, quality and legality
Participationthere is a stakeholder map and protection against exclusion
Pilotsolution is real, the effect is measurable, the risk is managed
IndependenceVerifier and ethics board are not subordinate to the executor
StopRed lines and revision procedure

​

Conclusion

Balance is the ability to jointly keep the future open.

World balances become manageable when measurement returns to its meaning: helping the individual, society, and state see the consequences, reconcile responsibility, and act before the deficit becomes an irreversible gap.

HUMANITYmeasure of the result: are real opportunities to live with dignity, to understand, to participate and to create?
CULTUREMechanism of connectivity: Do trust, knowledge, memory, norms of cooperation and the ability to create new ones reproduce?
BALANCEManagement Outline: Does the solution hold a safe corridor between needs, resources, risks, and responsibilities?

EQUILIBRIUM in this logic is not a rating of the world, but an operating system for monitoring, modeling, discussing and verifying decisions. Its value is determined not by the number of indicators, but by whether it prevents blind cost transfers and helps to create a long-term social result.

Man is a subject. Culture is connection.
Balance is responsibility in action.

​

Sources

Official materials used for the global context and methodological comparison

Date accessed: 27 August 2026. The numbers in the report retain the period of observation indicated by the primary source. International assessments may be reviewed as data and methodologies are updated.

  1. UNESCO. Global Report on Cultural Policies. https://www.unesco.org/en/culture/global-report
  2. UNESCO. MONDIACULT 2025: culture as a priority. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/mondiacult-2025-faced-global-divisions-unesco-calls-culture-be-made-priority
  3. UNESCO. MONDIACULT 2022: culture as a global public good. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/mondiacult-2022-states-adopt-historic-declaration-culture
  4. UNESCO. Global targets on out-of-school children. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/countries-commit-reducing-number-out-school-children-165-million
  5. WHO. Mental disorders — fact sheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders
  6. WHO / UNICEF. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene. https://www.who.int/news/item/26-08-2025-1-in-4-people-globally-still-lack-access-to-safe-drinking-water---who--unicef
  7. ITU. Facts and Figures 2025. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2025/
  8. UNEP. Global Resources Outlook 2024. https://www.unep.org/resources/Global-Resource-Outlook-2024
  9. UNEP. Emissions Gap Report 2025. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2025
  10. UNHCR. Global Trends 2025. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends
  11. FAO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2026. https://www.fao.org/publications/fao-flagship-publications/the-state-of-food-security-and-nutrition-in-the-world/en
  12. UNDP. Human Development Report 2025. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2025
  13. UNDP. Human Development Index — methodology. https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index
  14. UNCTAD. Creative Economy Outlook 2024. https://unctad.org/publication/creative-economy-outlook-2024
  15. UN DESA. World Population Prospects 2024. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/world-population-prospects-2024
  16. UN DESA. World Urbanization Prospects 2025. https://www.un.org/en/desa/WUP-2025
  17. ILO. Global Employment Trends for Youth 2024. https://researchrepository.ilo.org/view/pdfCoverPage?download=true&filePid=13130447130002676&instCode=41ILO_INST

​

A Annex Status of allegations

Minimal discipline of evidence

StatusWhich meansWhat must be published
[D] DataDirectly obtained or published observationssource, date, unit, cut, quality
[R] Calculationresult of the data conversionformula, code/version, parameters, sensitivity
[C] Scriptconditional trajectory under given assumptionsset of assumptions, range, revision events
[E] Expert assessmentProfessional judgment with incomplete dataExpertise, method of agreement, disagreement
[N] Normative proposalselected target, threshold or rulewho is authorized, value basis, procedure

A single statement can include several statuses. For example, the published number [D] after normalization becomes a calculation [R], and the selected threshold becomes a normative proposal [H]. The marking should relate to a specific step, not the entire document.

​

B Annex Rules for selecting indicators

Ten questions before including the indicator

  1. Is the indicator related to the result for a person, and not only to the volume of activity?
  2. Is there a clear mechanism for linking to balance and alternative explanations?
  3. Is it possible to divide values by territories and significant groups without violating rights?
  4. Are the definitions comparable over time and between sources?
  5. What is the delay in publication and is the indicator suitable for early warning?
  6. Can the indicator be improved formally without a real result?
  7. What unintended incentives will its inclusion in a contract or rating create?
  8. Is there a critical threshold beyond which the average dynamic ceases to be sufficient?
  9. How will uncertainty, omissions and revision of data be presented?
  10. Who is responsible for the source, calculation, interpretation and solution?
OTBORPreference is given to a small set of understandable and current indicators. The availability of data alone is not a reason for inclusion; the absence of an ideal indicator does not justify a hidden proxy substitution.

​

C Annex Set-up session scenario

One working day to determine the subject of the pilot

TimeBlockTaskResult
09:30–10:15Shared frameworkagree on status, terms and red linesProtocol of general and disputable provisions
10:15–11:30Decision Mapdescribe the real solution, budget, timing and ownerPassport Management Case
11:45–13:0019 balancesIdentify direct and indirect impactsDraft Materiality Matrix
14:00–15:15Causal Chainsform hypotheses, lags and cascadestwo or three verifiable cause maps
15:15–16:15Data and participationIdentify sources, gaps and stakeholdersData register and participation map
16:30–17:30Pilotagree stages, products, risks and stopDecision on the preparatory phase

Participants: customer decision, data owners, subject experts, representatives of the territory and vulnerable groups, specialist in rights and privacy, economist/financier, cultural mediator and independent moderator.

Published files

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Cooperation and international collaboration

The cooperative model, partnership, international cooperation and resources from the BRICS International Federation of Intellectual Games. The collection preserves the original distinctions between concepts, programme proposals and public descriptions.

Materials: 10 · with full text: 10 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Partnership · Full published text

Package for Alexander Shokhin and the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs

Source Status: Primary Document

A set of materials for discussion of the system of balances and programs with the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/paket-shokhinu-rspp

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM · ECO-PPA · SPECZASHCHITA · ESG-IR · SFERA

President of RSPP Alexander Shokhin

Initiator: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · 29 August 2026

Status: Proposal for expert discussion; not a solution or standard of the RUIE

02 / OFFICIAL TREATMENT

the President of the Russian Union

Industrialists and Entrepreneurs

Shokhin Alexander Nikolaevich

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

About carrying out on the site of RSPP 90-day approbation of the contour of formation and verification of industrial, environmental and social projects

Dear Alexander Nikolaevich!

Russian business needs an agreed mechanism linking the strategic task of the company or territory with the project solution, the obligations of the parties, resources, calendar, primary data and independently verifiable result.

I propose to hold on the site of RSPP 90-day organizational and methodological approbation of the author 's design and analytical outline "EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA — ESG-IR — SFERAthe Materials of Voluntary Participating Companies and Industry Associations.

Limit of offer

Approbation does not create funding obligations for the RSPP, does not mean the acceptance of the methodology by the RSPP standard and does not replace audit, mandatory reporting, expertise or government regulation.

Support 90-day testing.

To instruct the RSPP staff to identify a coordinator and prepare the composition of the working group and the technical task within 15 calendar days.

Invite relevant committees and voluntarily participating companies to submit up to three project cases to test the methodology.

Following the test, consider the consolidated report and decide on a 12-month pilot, revision of the methodology or completion of the experiment.

I am ready to present the architecture of the system and the draft of the technical task at a working meeting at a convenient time for you.

With respect,

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

severa70@mail.ru

03 / SOLUTION CARD

One limited solution is required

Allow verification of the mechanism on voluntary cases - without financial and reputational advance from the RSPP.

Draft decision
To support 90-day organizational and methodological testing; to identify a coordinator; to form a working group; to select up to three cases; on 90-th day to take a decision GO / GO WITH CONDITIONS / NO-GO.

ParameterProposed design
PlaygroundRSPP as an institutional coordinator of the business circuit.
SubjectProject passport, obligations, resources, data, risks, evidence and adjustment rules.
ParticipantsUp to three voluntary cases; preferably at least two companies and two industry contexts.
Timeframe90 calendar days from the approval of the technical specification.
ResultProven methodology, demonstration register, expert opinions, list of gaps and decision on further status.
What is not requiredRUIE financing, investment guarantee, acceptance of commercial or technological risk, preliminary recognition of the standard.

Logic corresponds to the previously formulated principle: RSPP is proposed not to adopt the system, but to jointly test the model.

04 / CONFORMITY OF THE RUIE

The proposal meets the current business agenda of the RSPP

Approbation combines the tasks of investment, technological sovereignty, cooperation, digitalization and evidence-based sustainability.

RUIE priorityPackage pairing pointSource
Balanced growth and investmentSelection of projects on the completeness of the mandate, resources, risks and measurable results.[1], [2]
Project and infrastructure financingPreparation of a verifiable project dossier before attracting PPP instruments, credit or bonds.[1], [3]
Technological SovereigntyAccounting for R&D, software, technology rights, engineering, localization and independent expertise.[4], [5]
Industrial cooperationAssembling a consortium to the specific request of the enterprise and replicating only a proven solution.[5]
Digitalization and productivityUnified data passport, reproducible calculation and protected demonstration register.[6], [7]
Responsible business practicesThe project chain of evidence as a complement to the current indices and public assurance of the RSPP.[8]
Ecology and climateMeasurable effect, adaptation, natural data and balance of environmental objectives with the capabilities of companies.[9], [10]

Positioning
Not a new comprehensive system, but a limited protocol for the preparation and verification of design solutions, compatible with the existing tools of companies and RSPP.

05 / VERIFIED PROBLEM

Initiative and report often exist separately from the proven result

  • Break 1. The strategic task is not translated into a single passport with the owner, borders and initial condition.
  • Break 2. Resources and obligations are accounted for in different systems and do not form a common chain of responsibility.
  • Break 3. The result indicator is fixed without a pre-approved methodology, baseline and data source.
  • Break 4. The executor, data owner and verifier may depend on each other.
  • Break 5. Reporting appears after execution and does not manage adjustments during the project.
  • Break 6. A successful case is difficult to replicate and scale without a common solution dossier.

Approbation Hypothesis
By linking mandate, passport, commitment, resources, primary data and independent verification in a single version chain, the decision to fund and scale will become more explainable and verifiable. This hypothesis must be confirmed or refuted by real cases.

06 / TRAVEL ROUTE

From enterprise request to scaling decision

Short formula
RSPP forms a request → EQUILIBRIUM Design Options → ECO-PPA consolidates the project and obligations → SPECZASHCHITA Collects execution → ESG-IR proves the result → SFERA Scaling a Verified Solution.

1. Request. A company or industry association formulates the problem, the owner of the solution and the boundaries of the case.

2. Diagnostics. EQUILIBRIUM Comparing the initial state, 19 Balance Sheets, Risks, Scenarios and Data Shortages.

3. Design. ECO-PPA converts the selected scenario into a passport, obligations, resource plan, calendar and result conditions.

4. Cooperation. SPECZASHCHITA forms performers, work packages, supply chain and evidentiary materials.

5. Verification. ESG-IR records the methods, origin of the data, independence of verification and status of each statement.

6. Portfolio. SFERA collects proven solutions and partners; The RSPP decides on further approbation or scaling.

Confirmed data is returned to EQUILIBRIUM for a new cycle of analysis and adjustment.

07 / PROJECT COUNTING SYSTEM

Eight related registries maintain the integrity of the project

This is not a replacement for accounting, ERP, EDMS or state information systems, but a connecting layer of project events.

R1 Mandate and authority - who is entitled to initiate, select, execute, own, verify and challenge data.

R2 Rights and Assets - What is owned, available, licensed, limited or encumbered.

R3 Obligations and risks - who, what, to whom and by what date should; who carries the risk of rejection.

R4 Resources and financing - sources, limits, reserves, conditions of use and actual consumption.

R5 Designs and solutions - options, selected scenario, feasibility study, calendar, assumptions and solution version.

R6 Actions and Executions - Work Packages, Deliveries, Checkpoints, and Deviations

R7 Data and evidence - source, owner, methodology, signature, measurement, origin and status of verification.

R8 Results and adjustments - change before/after, attribution, output, new version event and project lesson.

End-to-end identifier
One event identifier links records in all affected registries. An unrelated record cannot serve as the basis for a final calculation or statement of effect.

08 / UNIVERSAL PASSPORT

Passport of the project event — atom of approbation

BlockRequired fieldsMonitoring
IdentityID, type, territory, time, version.uniqueness, immutability
Basislaw, mandate, agreement, limit.authority, term
Problem and baselineboundaries, initial state, cut-off date.materiality, comparability
Partiesinitiator, owner, executor, beneficiary, validator.Division of roles
Sign inright, resource, data, obligation, risk.ownership, quality, access
Decisionscenario, feasibility study, calendar, assumptions, stop conditions.approval, version
Withdrawalnew condition, result, residue, side effect.Attribution, double counting
Evidencemethodology, measurement, document, signature, expert verification.origin, independence
Responsibilityowner of risk, SLA, dispute, correction.Escalation, adjustment

Version Rule
The error is not erased: a compensating event is created with a reference to the original record, the cause, the author, the time and a new version of the technique.

09 / MATRICA FULL

3 × 13 × 19 = 741 — The author's engineering hypothesis of completeness

Formula
Three Scales - Man, State, Planet - × thirteen phases of the life cycle × nineteen balances = 741 verification position. Each position answers: what is known, who is responsible, what is confirmed and whether an adjustment is required?

StatusMeaningManagement action
0 - no datasource is missing or unassignedappoint the owner and term
1 - observationdata is available, the threshold is not confirmedcheck the quality
2 - Riskcorridor is broken or insufficient evidenceEscalation to the owner of risk
3 — managementmandate, resource and action recordedMonitoring of execution
4 — provenThe result is independently verifiedcalculation and possible replication
5 — adjustmentconditions have changed or an error has been detectedcreate a new version event

Limitation
The matrix 741 is not claimed to be an RUIE standard, company rating or regulatory requirement. In approbation, only its practical utility for identifying unknown critical areas is tested.

10 / ECO-PPA

ECO-PPA collects project, commitment and resources

The working mechanism of the project assembly - until the final legal design of each case is determined.

Passport. object, territory, problem, baseline, parties and version of the design solution

Commitments. who provides the resource, who performs the action, who accepts the result and who carries the risk

Economic sources, budget and extra-budgetary instruments, the price of the result, reserves and calculation conditions

Calendar. Checkpoints, conditions of beginning, stopping, revision and completion

Evidence. metrics, methodologies, primary data, quality control and independent verification

Adjustment. order of change of initial condition, price, volume, terms and responsibility

Legal disclaimer
ECO-PPA is not declared an independent type of contract established by law. In each case, the lawyers qualify the applicable design: supply contract, contract, service, offset, concession, PPP, project financing or their acceptable combination.

Approbation ends not with the signing of the transaction, but with a verified project dossier and a list of legal options.

11 / PROOF ESG-IR

Each significant statement passes one chain of verification

Chain
Indicator → Methodology → baseline → Primary data → Owner → date → calculation → Proof → independent verification → status.

Method to result. The unit, boundaries, formula, assumptions, periodicity and criterion of materiality are fixed in advance.

Origin of data. The source, access right, version, quality control and all conversions are retained.

Status of approval. “confirmed”, “waiting for verification”, “rejected” or “not applicable”; there are no significant unsigned findings.

Independence. The Contractor does not confirm its own result; the conflict of interest is disclosed and managed.

Reproduction. The expert can repeat the calculation according to the same version of the data and methodology.

Conjugation with RSPP practice
ESG-IR is proposed as an experimental project layer of evidence, complementing, rather than replacing, the existing indices, non-financial reporting and public certification of the RSPP [8].

ESG-IR does not replace audit, EIA, government review, mandatory reporting or supervisory procedures.

12 / DIVISION OF TERMS

No circuit selects, executes and confirms its result simultaneously

ContourResponsibilityNot
RSPPplatform, business mandate, companies, rules of approbation and final decisionan investor, operator or verifier of projects
EQUILIBRIUMDiagnostics, Balances, Scenarios, Priorities and Analytical Optionsthe Corporate or State Decision Body
ECO-PPApassport, obligations, resources, calendar, risks and contractual assemblyIndependent type of contract without legal qualification
SPECZASHCHITAconsortium, organization, execution and supporting materialsIndependent reviewer of own results
ESG-IRindicators, data origin, verification rules and independent reviewreplacement of audit, reporting or state examination
SFERAportfolio, communication, search for partners and replication of provenSource of primary evidence or admission authority

Formula of responsibility
RSPP sets the platform and business mandate; EQUILIBRIUM see and prepare options; ECO-PPA collects the project; SPECZASHCHITA organizes execution; ESG-IR proves; SFERA Distributes only verified.

13 / APPRECIATION BODIES

The working group manages the experiment, not the projects of the companies

Coordinator from RSPP. convenes a working group, fixes decisions, routes cases and monitors mandate compliance

Participating companies. provide the case voluntarily, appoint the owners of the decision and data, determine the confidentiality regime

Industry experts. check the applicability of the methodology, technological assumptions and industry restrictions

The operator of the technique. prepares passports, dictionaries, a demonstration register and methodological materials

Legal and information security. checks law, data, trade secrets, IP, intellectual rights and cyber risks

Independent reviewers. evaluate the reproducibility of calculations, the sufficiency of evidence and conflicts of interest

Recommended sites for routing by the decision of the RSPP Office:

  • Committee on Environment and Climate Policy;
  • Committee on Sustainable Development and Population Policy;
  • Coordinating Council on Technological Leadership and Industrial Policy;
  • profile financial, digital and industry contours of RSPP.

14 / PLAN 90 DAYS

Six steps lead to a testable solution on day 90

TimeframeStageVerified result
1–10Mandate and perimetercoordinator, working group, TK, restrictions, confidentiality
11–25Selection of casesup to three cases, owners, source materials, materiality criteria
26–45Passportspassports ECO-PPA, baseline, roles, risks, indicators, data deficit
46–65Evidencedata dictionary, methods, ESG-IR-chains, legal and information security check
66–80End-to-end testdemonstration register, two consecutive sections, reproducibility test
81–90Decisionfinal report, independent review, plan 12 months, GO / conditions / NO-GO

Results 90 days
Regulations on the working group; a single dictionary; case passports; register of risks and obligations; protocol ESG-IR; conclusions on law, data and information security; demonstration register; project 12-month pilot.

It is recommended to complete at least two cases with a full end-to-end test; incomplete cases are documented as proven limitations of the technique.

15 / LAW, DATA AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Evidence is built without excessive data disclosure

  • Minimization. Only the amount of data required for a specific check is transmitted.
  • Possession. The source and legal owner of the data are recorded; participation does not change ownership automatically.
  • Separation of access. Open, working, confidential and protected layers have different modes.
  • Versionality. The original records, conversions, methodologies and adjustment decisions are retained.
  • Publication. External disclosure is allowed only with the consent of the owner and after verification of trade secrets.
  • Intellectual rights. The methodology, initial decisions of the companies and joint results are delimited by the agreement before the work begins.

Stop-conditions
Approbation is suspended if there is no legal basis for data processing; it is impossible to separate the operator from the verifier; critical infrastructure is disclosed; third-party rights are violated; there is no appeal mechanism.

Specific requirements are determined by lawyers, data owners and information security specialists for each case.

16 / TRANSITION CRITERIA

Transition to 12 months is possible only under critical conditions

  • At least two companies confirm further participation in writing.
  • Each case has a decision owner and data owner.
  • Mandatory passport fields are filled or the data deficit is officially accepted by the working group.
  • For key indicators, a unit, baseline, source, methodology, frequency and method of verification are determined.
  • All significant statements have signed status; calculations are reproduced by an independent expert.
  • At least two consecutive data slices are obtained.
  • There are no unresolved critical legal, informational or ethical risks.
  • The contractor does not confirm its own result.
  • The companies approved a resource and organizational plan for a 12-month-old pilot.
DecisionCondition
GOAll critical conditions are met
GO WITH CONDITIONSThere are only non-critical breaks with the owner and the approved deadline for elimination.
NO-GO / REDESIGNno owner, the result is immeasurable, the calculation is irreproducible or a critical conflict of interest persists

17 / CONTOUR 12-MONTH PILOT

Pilot Scales Proven Process, Not Promised Effect

PeriodMain objectiveResult of period
Months 1–3Regulatory and technical architecturecontracts, data model, integration, independence rules
Months 4–6Production cycles of casesoperational events, control sections, deflection management
Months 7–9effect and reproducibility checkindependent calculations, adjustments, industry comparison
Months 10–12Scaling AssessmentFinal dossier, economic and legal assessment, decision of RSPP and companies

Prior to the start of the pilot, a separate approval is required:

  • perimeter of companies, cases, data and integrations;
  • budget and sources of funding - without assuming that the RSPP finances the pilot;
  • methods of indicators, independent reviewer and rules of conflict of interest;
  • order of publication, protection of trade secrets and distribution of intellectual property rights;
  • Stop conditions, order of dispute, adjustment and completion.

The criterion of success
At least one reproducible route from signal to adjustment where authority, resource, action, data, proof, and solution can be restored.

18 / DRAFT RESOLUTION

Draft order of the President of RSPP

1. Support
Conducting 90-day organizational and methodological testing without the obligations of the RSPP to finance projects and without prior recognition of the methodology as an instrument or standard of the RSPP.

2. RSPP, together with the interested committees and departments, shall submit within 15 calendar days:

  • the candidate coordinator;
  • Draft regulations on the working group;
  • technical task;
  • list of voluntarily participating organizations and cases;
  • rules for working with data, trade secrets and approbation results.

3. The Working Group shall ensure:

  • testing the methodology on a limited set of voluntary cases;
  • independent legal, technical and methodological review;
  • preservation of the right of companies to terminate participation in the manner prescribed by the terms of reference.

4. Upon completion 90 days
Submit to the President of the RSPP the final report and draft decision: go to the 12-month pilot; continue refining with the conditions; or complete the experiment.

The wording is a project for legal and organizational improvement by the RSPP.

19 / SET OF APPLICATIONS

Package ready for review at the first working meeting

  1. Annex 1. One-page solution card and testing limits.
  2. Annex 2. Draft regulation on the working group.
  3. Annex 3. Technical specifications for 90 days.
  4. Annex 4. Passport form of the project event / ECO-PPA.
  5. Annex 5. Dictionary of eight registers, 19 balances and 13 phases.
  6. Annex 6. Map of completeness 741 and status rules.
  7. Annex 7. Protocol ESG-IR and verification independence requirements.
  8. Annex 8. Form of voluntary consent of the company and confidentiality regime.
  9. Annex 9. Criteria for selection of cases and the template of the initial data.
  10. Annex 10. Register of risks, conflicts of interest and stop conditions.
  11. Annex 11. GO / GO Criteria WITH CONDITIONS / NO-GO.
  12. Annex 12. Contour 12-month pilot and a list of solutions before launch.

Proposed first step
30- minute working performance: 10 minutes - problem and contour; 10 minutes — passport and proof; 10 minutes — decision on the composition of the working group and cases.

20 / OFFICIAL SOURCES

Current agenda and status of the addressee checked on materials of RSPP and Kremlin

[1] Draft resolution XXXV of the Congress of the RUIE, 23.03.2026

[2] Results XXXV Congress of the RSPP, 27.03.2026

[3] Investments and structural shifts, RSPP, 19.08.2026

[4] Investments, cooperation, localization, RSPP, 24.08.2026

[5] Results of "Innoprom-2026", RSPP, 09.07.2026

[6] Digital Forum: Barriers to Development AI, RSPP, 24.02.2026

[7] Labor productivity, RSPP, 27.06.2026

[8] RSPP Responsible Business Practices Report 2022–2026

[9] RSPP Committee on Ecology and Climate Policy, 18.04.2026

[10] National Climate Agenda Report, RSPP, 04.06.2026

Structure of RSPP: President of RSPP A.N. Shokhin

Working meeting of the President of the Russian Federation with the President of RSPP A.N. Shokhin, 26.05.2026

Document status
Author's concept. Any legal, financial, technical, metrological and industry conclusions arise only after independent verification of specific cases. Access to sources verified 29 August 2026

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA — ESG-IR — SFERA

Other published edition: Package to A.N. Shokhin Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.pptx · Web Text +

Project Cycle Counting System

RSPP proposal to jointly test the model on voluntary cases - without funding commitments and without premature status of the standard.

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

29 August 2026

01 / 15

One solution runs a no-commitment test

COUNTING SYSTEM

Authorize joint testing of the counting model on a limited set of voluntary cases.

RSPP forms a request and a verification site.

NON-FINANCING

days

The method gets the status only after the facts and expertise.

NOT STANDARD

12 months are discussed only after a positive result.

NOT A PILOT A YEAR

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

02 / 15

RSPP sets the request and rules for verification

Role of RSPP

Intersectoral cooperation

RSPP

not the project operator

Compare cases from different companies and industries.

Investment and ESG-agenda

Its value is to unite companies, fix the business issue and take the result according to previously agreed criteria.

Link the economics of the project with verifiable data.

Productivity and Scaling

Separate the reproducible mechanism from the single practice.

Request → Rules → Conclusion

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

03 / 15

The project cycle is broken between documents

CYCLE DEVELOPMENT

Today

REQUEST

TECHMODELE

AGREEMENT

EXECUTION

DATA

DECISION

ROLES

DEVELOPMENTS

PROOF

Liability limits are not fixed

The contract and the actual event differ

Data is collected post-facto

We need a common counting circuit that links the decision, commitment, event, and confirmation.

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

04 / 15

Six functions form a cross-cutting contour

DISTRIBUTION OF FUNCTIONS

One circuit - different owners of functions

forms a request

Designing

RSPP

EQUILIBRIUM

unites and implements

Strengthens the economy

SPECZASHCHITA

ECO-PPA

proves the result

Scaling

ESG-IR

SFERA

Inquiry → Project → Implementation → Economy → Proof → Scale

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

05 / 15

Eight registers collect the project in a single ledger

WORKING MODEL

Request and mandate

ECO-PPA

What is being checked and who is authorized

Economic obligations and conditions

Participants and roles

Events

Responsibility, Access and Conflict of Functions

What happened, when and to what extent

Project solutions

ESG-IR

versions, assumptions and points of choice

chain of evidence and verification

Data

Decisions

source, owner, quality and period

GO, Conditions, Stop or Scaling

Registers are subject to verification, not a ready-made regulatory form.

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

06 / 15

ECO-PPA

ECONOMY

ECO-PPA enshrines economic logic in event passport

EXPERIMENTAL MECHANISM

WHAT IS AGREED

object · base · indicator · commitment

A working passport that links a condition, a measurable event, and an economic consequence.

WHAT HAPPENED

Event · Period · Deviation · Owner

WHAT IS CONFIRMED

It does not promise profitability. It does not replace the contract. Checks the model connectivity.

Source · Method · Verification · Conclusion

The passport becomes a common reference point for business, project and evidentiary function.

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

07 / 15

ESG-IR concludes reproducible, not declarative

EVALUATION CHARGE

EXPERIMENTAL MECHANISM · each total passes one chain of origin of data

REQUIREMENT

SOURCE

EVENT

What needs to be proved

Where the data came from

what happened and when

METHOD

VERIFICATION

CONCLUSION

How the indicator is calculated

Who and what checked

What can be asserted

If the link is not confirmed, the conclusion is marked as conditional or unproven.

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

08 / 15

741

MAP VERIFICATION

741 — completeness card, not standard

3 × 13 × 19

facility · enterprise · inter-industry circuit

3 scales

Test combination

Project and operational cycle sequence

13 Phases

The coating helps to see omissions and repetitions - it does not prove the applicability of each combination.

Economics, Resources, Commitments and Evidence

19 balances

On the 90-th day the map is revised on the actual cases.

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

09 / 15

Separation of Functions Protects Self-Esteem Verification

ROLES AND BORDERS

Each participant is responsible for his own site; the result is formed only by comparing independent contours.

CONTOURFUNCTIONBORDER
RSPPrequest and rulesNot an operator and not a verifier
EQUILIBRIUMArchitecture Modelsdoes not confirm its own result
SPECZASHCHITAIntegration and executionNot the only source of data
ECO-PPAexperimental economic passportNo guarantee of effect or funding
ESG-IRExperimental chain of evidenceoutput only within the data
SFERAPropagationAfter the Go decision.

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

10 / 15

Up to three voluntary cases are enough for the first check

CASE SELECTION

Minimum Variability

Criteria for admission

Case

  • Volunteering. Written consent of the owner of the case.
  • Availability of data. The source and the responsible are identified.
  • Eventuality. There is a measurable change within 90 days.
  • Legally verifiable. There is no prohibition on contour analysis.
  • Comparability. There is a common minimum of fields between cases.

Managed Volume

Company

Not a single practice

Industry

tolerability check

Commercial data remains with the owners; access mode is agreed separately.

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

11 / 15

90 days divided into three test stages

SCHEDULE OF APROBATION

Each stage ends with an artifact and a decision to continue.

DAYS 1–30

DAYS 31–60

DAYS 61–90

Assembly

PROGON

CONCLUSION

Mandate · cases · data · basic passports

Events · Deviations · Proof Chain

reconciliation · criteria · solution GO/NO-GO

Transition between stages - only in the presence of the data owner and the permitted mode of operation.

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

12 / 15

Day 90: Six verifiable results

RESULTS OF THE APROBATION

Proven role scheme

Passport Cases

Who creates, transmits and confirms data

single minimum ECO-PPA for selected projects

Completed registers

Evidence Chains

consequences of decisions, events and deviations

ESG-IR marked with spaces

Legal Data Limitations

Outcome protocol

List of permits, risks and improvements

GO, conditional GO or NO-GO

The value of approbation is not a beautiful report, but the right to accept a negative conclusion on a verifiable basis.

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

13 / 15

Outcome: data, law, reproducibility

CRITERIUM RESULT

The same criteria apply to each case and to the model as a whole.

CRITERIAGOCONDITIONAL GONO-GO
Data traceabilitySource and owner confirmedThere are closed gaps.Key source not available
Legal capacitymode applicableNeed to refine conditionsModel not applicable
ReproducibilityRepeat the resultRepeat with reservationsthe conclusion depends on the manual interpretation
Practical loadproportional to the taskneed to simplify the contourLoad Blocks Application
Readiness of participantsOwners are appointedNeed for additional commitmentsNo responsible parties

A 12-month pilot is only possible after GO or an agreed conditional GO.

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

14 / 15

Resolution fixes limited next step

DECISION

"To support the joint 90-day testing of the project cycle counting system on voluntary cases of RSPP member companies. To instruct the working group to determine the composition of cases, the mode of working with data and the criteria for the final decision. The question of 12-month pilot to consider after the confirmation of the data, the legal and practical viability of the model.

Schedule a working meeting and agree on the owner of 90-day approbation

NEXT STEP

Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · severa70@mail.ru

PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin

15 / 15

Sources cited in presentation 7

  • https://rspp.ru/about/structure/
  • https://rspp.ru/events/news/na-sezde-rspp-s-uchastiem-prezidenta-rf-vladimira-putina-obsudili-perspektivy-vozvrashcheniya-ekonomiki-k-ustoychivomu-rostu-69c6a06a2db37/
  • https://rspp.ru/events/news/investitsii-i-strukturnye-sdvigi-chto-biznes-zhdet-ot-donastroyki-gospodderzhki-itogi-zasedaniya-soveta-po-strategicheskomu-razvitiyu-6a85c4928270a/
  • https://rspp.ru/events/news/investitsii-kooperatsiya-lokalizatsiya-koorsovet-rspp-v-tsfo-oboznachil-prioritety-promyshlennoy-politiki-6a8c04594bc28/
  • https://rspp.ru/events/news/proizvoditelnost-truda-kak-osnova-razvitiya-o-chem-govorili-na-federalnom-sovete-rspp-6a3f9781490a4/
  • https://rspp.ru/download/65ddb8db6f5289602e8d1aa18c76a1d934d4ce7093107c7f/
  • [/Sources]

Published files

International cooperation · Full published text

Russia — India: Biotic Communities

Source Status: Primary Document

A shared framework for programmes combining nature and technology and solutions involving biotic communities in Russia and India.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/rossiya-indiya-biotsenozy

Open on the site

Biosphere Partnership, Ganga Cleanup and Joint Early Warning System

WATER • SOIL • BIOGRAPHY • MAN • PROVEN RESULTS

Concept: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich | 2026

02 / SUMMARY

One program - from pollution to restored biocenosis

The joint system is not a substitute for national programmes. It combines data, solutions, financing and verifiable natural effects.

Proposed solution: Create a Russian–Indian EQUILIBRIUM framework for river basin management: a flagship Ganges pilot, comparable Russian catchments as a technology laboratory, a unified “Ledger” of evidence, and expansion to soils, air, forests and cities.
  • The main Indian pilot is the Ganges and tributaries: wastewater, industrial discharges, solid waste, agrostocks, floodplain soils and aquatic biota.
  • Russian contribution includes satellite and ground diagnostics, cold climate and large catchments, modeling of fires and permafrost, laboratory verification, cleaning engineering and digital twins.
  • Joint standard - biocenosis passport, chain "signal → source → risk → action → result", interoperable data and independent audit.
  • The financial mechanism ECO-PPA mobilizes resources to the detriment and pays not for the equipment as such, but for the confirmed reduction in load and restoration of ecosystem functions.
  • The first goal is for 100 days to agree on a Gang pilot, a Russian reference catchment, a baseline, data owners and a package of 12 Measurable indicators.

03 / FOUNDATION

Current cooperation and national programmes framework

ContourWhat already worksHow the concept is used
Russia - IndiaJoint Statement 2025: Working Group on Climate and Low-Carbon Development; Science and Technology Roadmap; Sustainable Financing.Legal window for joint R&D, climate data and pilots. A separate agreement on biocenoses is still required.
RussiaNational project "Environmental well-being": water, air, waste, forests and biodiversity in federal projects.Connection of Russian basins, protected areas, laboratories and observation platforms.
IndiaNamami Gange: sewerage, surface cleaning, industrial monitoring, biodiversity, reforestation, Ganga Gram.Not to duplicate the mission, but to strengthen the end-to-end diagnostics of the pool and the evidence of the natural result.
MultilateralKunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and Climate Agenda BRICS.Compatible Indicators, Reporting and Scaling in the Global South.

Sources: PIB, Joint Statement following the 23rd India–Russia Annual Summit, 05.12.2025; Government of the Russian Federation, national project "Environmental Well-being"; NMCG, Namami Gange Programme; CBD, GBF.

All new bodies, funds, data protocols and indicators below are project proposals. They become mandatory only after the decision of the authorized bodies of Russia and India.

04 / BIOCENOSIS

The two countries are a complementary natural laboratory

RussiaIndiaJoint scientific task
Arctic, tundra, permafrostHimalayas, glaciers, highlandsCryosphere, runoff, extreme events, adaptation of mountain communities.
Taiga and boreal forestsMonsoon, dry and mountain forestsFires, carbon, pests, fragmentation, recovery.
Volga, Ob, Yenisei, Lena; lakes and swampsGanges, Brahmaputra and large wetland systemsWater quality, ecological runoff, eutrophication, floodplains and biota.
Steppes and black soilsIndo-Gang Plain and AgrolandscapesSoil fertility, erosion, salinity, agrochemical load.
Baltic, Arctic, Pacific, CaspianArabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, islands and mangrovesCoastal sustainability, plastic, fishing, blue carbon.
Industrial and Northern CitiesMegacities and fast-growing citiesAir, heat, storm drain, waste, green-blue infrastructure.
Not a separate object of purification and not a single species, but a functioning biocenose: water, soil, plants, animals, microorganisms, man and man-made load in a specific space and time.

05 / RISKS

Common threats require common evidentiary logic

ThreatEarly SignalDecision
Wastewater and industrial dischargesBOD/COD, DO, ammonium, metals, microbial markers, emergency peaks.Source → localization → process barrier → downstream verification.
Soil degradationOrganic carbon, erosion, salinity, pesticide residues, microbiome.Buffer strips, regenerative practices, phytoremediation, agrostock control.
Fires, heat and droughtMoisture, temperature, combustible mass, smoke, runoff deficit.Forecasting, preventive management, protection of the population, restoration of mosaics.
Floods and landslidesPrecipitation, soil saturation, slope displacements, levels and flow rates.Early warning, floodplain solutions, natural barriers, evacuation plan.
Loss of biodiversityeDNA, bioacoustics, indicator species, habitat breaks.Protection of key areas, corridors, habitat restoration, control of invasions.
Waste and plasticMaterial flows, satellite and field observations, waste morphology.Prevention, collection, recycling, producer responsibility, cleaning.
First we prevent the flow of pollution, then we intercept the flow, then we restore the ecosystem. Cleaning without eliminating the source creates an infinite expense.

06 / FLAGMAN

Ganges: from cleaning the riverbed to the health of the entire catchment

The project strengthens Namami Gange through the management of "inflow - city - enterprise - field - soil - river - delta".

PackageActionTested effect
1. SourcesRegister of releases, storm drains, landfills, agricultural zones and emergency risks; online sensors and satellite reconciliation.Share of identified load; detection time; closing illegal points.
2. WaterOptimization of STP/CETP, decentralized cleaning, control of DO/BOD/COD, pathogens, nutrients and metals.Reducing the load on the structure, compliance with the target water classes, stability of the structures.
3. Soil and CaughtBuffer strips, restoration of organic matter, phytoremediation, anti-erosion measures.Reduction of nitrogen/phosphorus and sediment removal; soil carbon growth and infiltration.
4. WastePlastic interception, sludge management, prevention of open burning, circular chains.Mass of prevented revenues; safe disposal of sediment; reduction of toxic emissions.
5. BiotaeDNA, fish, dolphins, turtles, birds, macrozoobentos; habitat restoration and ecological runoff.Return of indicator species; habitat connectivity; biotic index.
6. PeopleOpen panel, sanitary signals, participation of Ganga Gram, contracts with cities and enterprises.Reducing health risks; speed of response; community trust and participation.

Base: NMCG defines Namami Gange as an integrated mission to reduce pollution, preserve and restore the Ganges; the official list includes eight reference areas.

07 / RELATIONSHIP

Water, soil, air and waste are one causal circuit

  1. Source: A city, enterprise, farm, transportation, landfill, or natural event forms the flow of matter and energy.
  2. The transport path is sewerage, rainfall, groundwater, erosion, air and food chains carry the load.
  3. Biocenosis - Oxygen, microbiome, fertility, species, productivity, sustainability, and sanitary properties change.
  4. Humans are exposed to the risks of drinking water, food, income, health, cultural practices and safety.
  5. The answer is regulation, engineering barrier, natural recovery, behavioral measure and economic incentive.
  6. Evidence — Before/after, a control site, data provenance, independent verification and an entry in the Ledger.
A solution is not considered successful if pollution has gone from water to toxic sludge, from soil to air, from city to neighborhood, or from one season to the next.

08 / OBJECT

Biocenosis passport — the minimum unit of joint management

Passport sectionContents
IdentityBorders, catchment, seasonality, land use, population, environmental status.
StateWater, soil, air, vegetation, animals, microorganisms, human health.
FunctionsWater treatment, fertility, pollination, flow control, carbon, cooling, cultural value.
LoadSources, masses and concentrations, frequency, legal status, owner of risk.
ThresholdNormative, scientific boundary, local target range, alert level.
ActionResponsible, time, resource, technology, dependence, social constraints.
ResultMetrics, baseline, reference point, uncertainty, verifier.
HistoryData versions, decisions, costs, changes, incidents and lessons.
Ledger. Each entry answers the question: who claims, on what grounds, that an action changed the state of a biotic community, at what cost and with what uncertainty?

09 / SENSOR BODY

Biocenosis monitoring point

ZvenoExamples of Signals
ATMOSPHEREPM2.5, NOx, odors, aerosols, weather conditions
WATERDO, BOD/COD, pH, conductivity, turbidity, nutrients, pathogens
SOILmoisture, organic carbon, erosion, salinity, chemical residues
PLANTSvegetation indices, stress, productivity, invasive species
ANIMALSeDNA, bioacoustics, indicator species, migration, mortality
MICROORGANISMSmicrobiome, resistor, decomposition functions and the cycle of substances
HUMANITYhealth data, access to water, complaints, employment, cultural practices
TECHNOGENIC LOADemissions, waste, land use, transport, accidents, energy consumption

Five mandatory questions

  • What's going on?
  • Is it a natural change or a dangerous deviation?
  • Where's the source?
  • What is the effect on biocenosis and humans?
  • What to do now and how to check the result?

10 / ARCHITECTURE

EQUILIBRIUM combines observation, solution and execution

LayerPurposeProduct
1. MonitoringSatellites, drones, stations, laboratories, eDNA, civilian signals.Verified data flow and quality assessment.
2. ModelThe digital twin of watershed and biocenosis; causal hypotheses and scenarios.Prognosis, zone of impact, uncertainty.
3. NormaNational requirements, local thresholds, access rights and data sovereignty.Machine-readable basis of the decision.
4. DecisionPrioritization of threats, comparison of measures, the cost of inaction.Recommendation and Authorized Plan.
5. ResourceBudget, ECO-PPA, grant, PPP, contribution of enterprise or community.Secured source of funding.
6. ImplementationSPECZASHCHITA: engineering, natural and organizational action.Completed package of works and operational control.
7. ProofLedger: provenance, signature, before/after, audit, adjustment.Confirmed result and new knowledge.
Indian data remain under Indian control, Russian data under Russian control. Agreed indicators, models and evidence are transmitted between the parties according to the federal protocol.

11 / MATHEMATICS

19 balance sheets and 741 integration

№BalanceThe control question
1waterHas the quality and environmental flow improved?
2soilHave they moved the load into the soil?
3AtmosphereHave emissions and odors increased?
4BiotaAre types and functions restored?
5MicrobiomeDoes the functional microbiome persist?
6carbonWhat is the full carbon effect?
7NutrientsIs N/P closed without eutrophication?
8energyWhat is energy and reliability?
9materials and wasteIs the flow prevented and is the sediment safe?
10Land UseIs the conflict of use reduced?
11HealthIs the health risk reduced?
12FoodIs water and food safer?
13economyCan we achieve an effect on the life cycle?
14EmploymentAre there any safe local jobs?
15CultureAre the cultural functions of the river preserved?
16LawIs there power, responsibility and protection of rights?
17SecurityHas a new systemic risk been created?
18Data and trustIs it proven origin and quality?
19intergenerational effectIs the short-term effect bought at the cost of the future?
741 3 scale (man — state — planet) × 13 Life Cycle Phases × 19 Balance Sheets = 741 engineering completeness control position.

12 / CYCLE

13 Phases: Early warning before adjustment

PhaseMeaning
Signalfixation of the change
QualitySensor and data verification
Contextseason, weather, background
SourceCausal hypothesis
RiskEnvironmental and human damage
ThresholdThe Escalation Rule
DecisionChoice of measures
RightAuthority and protection of rights
ResourceFunding and Capacity
ActionSPECZASHCHITA
Monitoringoperational supervision
Resultbefore/after and verification
Correctionupdating the model and norms
Reaction period For emergency discharge, the cycle takes hours; for soil restoration, seasons; for biodiversity, years. Not the same speed, but the discipline of proof.

13 / MANAGEMENT

Joint contour without loss of national responsibility

OrganCompositionResponsibility
Strategic CouncilAuthorized bodies of Russia and India; observers by agreement.Mandate, priorities, budgetary framework, resolution of interstate issues.
Scientific and Technical CouncilHydrologists, soil scientists, ecologists, epidemiologists, engineers, data specialists.Methods, baselines, models, uncertainty, open publications.
Ganga Pilot OfficeNMCG and Indian basin authorities; Russian technological and scientific partners.Creation plan, integration with PRAYAG and existing projects, operational result.
Russian Reference GroundProfile federal/regional bodies, basin structures and laboratories.Parallel testing of technologies and methods in the Russian catchment.
Independent verificationAccredited laboratories and auditors of the two countries.Confirmation of data, conflict of interest, selective rechecking.
Community domainMunicipalities, Ganga Gram, farmers, businesses, NGOs, indigenous and local communities.Signals, coordination of measures, local knowledge, social license.
The algorithm recommends responsibility; the authorized person makes a decision; the body responds; the laboratory confirms; the society sees an understandable version of the proof.

14 / PILOT

Six joint programmes 2026–2030

PilotRussiaIndiaFirst result
Ganges: clean water and healthy catchEngineering, monitoring of large catchments, laboratories, digital twin.NMCG, States, cities, STP/CETP, Ganga Gram.Pilot unit with full causal model and 12 KPI.
Ganges — Volga: swimming pool schoolReference areas of the Volga and other watersheds.Ganges and tributaries.Comparable protocols for water, sludge, soil and biota quality.
Arctic - HimalayasThe scum, the snow, the northern runoff.Glaciers, high-altitude catchments, landslides.Joint seasonal risk forecast for water and population.
Forests and firesTaiga, satellite monitoring, smoke.Monsoon and dry forests, community management.Early warning and mosaic restoration plan.
Agrobiocenoses and soilsBlack soils, steppes, precision farming.Indo-Gang Plain, small farmers.Reduction of N/P yield while maintaining yield and income.
Cities and wasteCold climate, industrial cities.Megacities, heat, showers, plastic.Green and Blue Infrastructure and Prevented Waste Flow.
Priority First the Ganges and the soil of its watershed. The rest of the pilots are launched only after the general protocol proves operability on one real creature.

15 / FINANCING

ECO-PPA: resource to threat, payment after result

ContourSourceCondition
Basic infrastructureNational and regional budgets, operating programmes, PPP.Compliance with the law, O&M life cycle, open cost of ownership.
Joint R&DScientific foundations, universities, technology companies of the two countries.Open methods, mutual verification, joint intellectual property under the contract.
Threat preventionECO-PPA, insurance, polluter contribution, reserve funds.Pay for readiness and for a measurable reduction in the probability/scale of damage.
RecoveryNatural and climatic funds, grants, effective contracts.Baseline, additionality, no load transfer, independent verification.
Local economyMicrogrants, community procurement, Ganga Gram, cooperatives.Income is related to maintaining the function of the biocenosis, not a one-time campaign.

Payment logic

  • 20–30% - readiness and baseline; 40–60% - completed action; 20–30% - confirmed natural result and stability after the season.
  • The exact share is determined by the competition and risk; this is a project model, not a valid budget norm.
  • In case of deterioration of the adjacent balance, the payment is suspended until corrected.

16 / ROAD CARD

2026–2030: from one creation to a compatible network

PeriodResultCheckpoint
0–100 daysMandate, created Ganga, Russian watershed, data owners, passport, 12 KPI, risk map.Signed pilot protocol and published baseline.
4–12 monthsSensors, laboratory QA/QC, source register, MVP digital twin and ledger.The verified signal goes through a complete 13-phase cycle.
12–24 monthsWater-soil-waste-biota packages; ECO-PPA; community participation; independent verification.Measurable load reduction without carrying the problem.
24–36 monthsGanges-Volga School, Arctic-Himalaya, agro-soil, forests and cities.At least three compatible biocenosis passports.
36–48 monthsFederated exchange of indicators, certified methods, technology catalog.The decision to scale to the regions of the two countries and BRICS.
The new stage is funded only after independent verification of the previous one. Scaling should not outpace proof of causality.

17 / INDICATORS

12 KPI Ganga Flag Pilot

BlockIndicators
Water1) DO/BOD/COD and Targeted Pollutants; 2) Percentage of time in target class; 3) mass of the prevented load.
Soil and Caught4) organic carbon/infiltration; 5) N/P and sediment removal; 6) area of restored buffers.
Biota7) eDNA/macrozoobenthos index; 8) status of indicator species and habitats.
Waste9) Prevented plastic and illegal dumping; 10) safe handling of silt.
Management11) Time " Signal → confirmation → Action"; 12) percentage of records with full traceability and independent verification.

Security metrics are added to KPI

  • health and sanitary risk of the population;
  • life cycle cost and reliability of operation;
  • Income and community participation;
  • carbon and air footprint solution;
  • complaints, land use conflicts and rights.

18 / SOLUTION

First package for 100 days

  1. To appoint a joint group on biocenoses and basin monitoring within the framework of existing mechanisms of science, climate and economic cooperation.
  2. Select the Ganges site - with a combination of urban, industrial and agricultural pressure available from data from NMCG and interested local authorities.
  3. Selecting a Russian polygon is not a “copy of the Ganges”, but a reference for methods of monitoring, cleaning, soils and proving the result.
  4. Fix the baseline - one technique, seasonality, control areas, uncertainty, data rights and public version.
  5. Launch three quick packages - sources of pollution; water/cleaning; soil/agricultural - with parallel biotic and social assessment.
  6. Prepare ECO-PPA — contract of readiness and result with independent verification, O&M and load transfer ban.
The decision to approve the development of an interdepartmental passport of the pilot "Gang: water - soil - biocenosis" and appoint Russian and Indian coordinators to prepare a joint feasibility study.

19 / SOURCES

Main official materials

№MaterialReference
1Press Information Bureau, Government of India. Joint Statement following the 23rd India–Russia Annual Summit, 5 December 2025.https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2199494&lang=2&reg=3
2Press Information Bureau. Joint Statement following the 22nd India–Russia Annual Summit, 9 July 2024.https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2031946
3National Mission for Clean Ganga. Namami Gange Programme.https://nmcg.nic.in/NamamiGanga.aspx
4National Mission for Clean Ganga. Aquatic Biodiversity Conservation in Ganga River Basin.https://nmcg.nic.in/AboutBio.aspx
5Press Information Bureau. Targets achieved under Namami Gange Mission, 31 July 2025.https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2150716&lang=2&reg=3
6Press Information Bureau. Progress under Namami Gange Programme, 2 April 2026.https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2248377&lang=2&reg=3
7Government of the Russian Federation. National project "Environmental well-being".https://government.ru/info/54308/
8Government of the Russian Federation. Preparation of the national project "Environmental Well-being", 9 October 2024.https://government.ru/news/52949/
9Forest Survey of India. India State of Forest Report 2023.https://fsi.nic.in/gallery&type=166
10National Biodiversity Authority of India. Mandate and NBSAP update materials.https://www.nbaindia.org/
11Convention on Biological Diversity. Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.https://www.cbd.int/gbf
12Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, India. National Mission on Himalayan Studies — grant guidelines 2024–25.https://moef.gov.in/storage/tender/1728110920.pdf

Date of verification of web sources: 29.08.2026. Numerical indicators in the project document require re-verification before official use.

Other published editorial board: RUSSIA — INDIA Rossiya_Indiya_Biocenozy.pptx · web text +

Biotic Communities

Biosphere Partnership, Ganga Cleanup

and Joint Early Warning System

WATER

SOIL

BIOTA

LEDGER

Concept: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich | 2026

The window is already open - a project bridge is needed

BASIC

Russia - India

Russia

India

Joint Statement 2025 sets out a working group on climate and low-carbon development, a science and technology roadmap and sustainable financing.

The national project "Environmental Well-being" combines water, air, waste, forests and biodiversity in existing federal projects.

Namami Gange already covers sewerage, surface cleaning, industrial monitoring, biodiversity, reforestation and Ganga Gram.

PROJECT BRIDGE

General passport of biocenosis + Federal exchange of indicators + Early Warning + ECO‑PPA + independent verification

New bodies and commitments are proposals, not decisions already taken.

The two countries are a complementary natural laboratory

Biotic Communities

Russia

India

KRYOSFERA

Arctic • tundra •

Himalayas • glaciers • highlands

FOREST

taiga • boreal landscapes

monsoon • dry • mountain forests

WATER

Volga • Volume • Enisey • swamp

Ganges • Brahmaputra • wetland systems

SOIL

steppes • black soils • northern soils

Indo - Ganges Plain • agrolandscapes

BEREGA

Arctic • Baltic • Pacific • Caspian

Arabian Sea • Bay of Bengal • Mangrove

CITIES

Northern • Industrial • Small towns

megacities • heat • monsoon • plastic

Common threats require one evidentiary logic

RISKS

REMOVAL

SOILS

FIRE

DO • BOD/COD • Pathogens • Metals

source → barrier → verification

Carbon • Erosion • Salinization • Pesticides

buffers → agropractice → remediation

humidity • temperature • smoke • runoff deficit

Forecast → Prevention → Recovery

FLOOR

BIOTA

WASTE

precipitation • saturation • levels • landslides

Signal → Protection → Evacuation

eDNA • bioacoustics • indicator species

Corridors → Habitats → Control of Invasions

Material Flows • plastic • IL • Landfills

Prevent → Collect → Recycle

PRIORITY: prevent entry → Intercept the stream → Restoring the ecosystem.

Ganges: clean not the channel - heal the catchment

FLAGMAN

The project strengthens Namami Gange with the link "inflow - city - enterprise - field - soil - river - delta".

CITY

Fields

sewerage •

Fertilizer • Pesticides

GANG

AND THE FREIGHTS

ENTERPRISE

PIPE AND POIMA

Ecological runoff

water quality

aquatic biota

industrial discharges

erosion • infiltration

WASTE

PEOPLE AND BIOT

plastic • silt • landfill

Health • species • income

LEDGER: BEFORE / AFTER / SOURCE / AUDIT

Six interventions — one testable result

Work packages

SOURCES

WATER

SOIL

WASTE

BIOTA

PEOPLE

Register of issues

and agricultural zone

STP/CETP • Sensors

and pathogens

Buffers • Carbon

and erosion

Plastic • IL

and combustion

eDNA • species

and Habitat

Health • Ganga Gram

and trust

RESULTS = reduced load + restored function + Lack of problem transfer + independent verification

Biocenosis passport — the minimum unit of management

OBJECT

IDENTITY

STATE

FUNCTIONS

LOADING

boundaries • catchment • seasonality

water • soil • air • biota • people

Purification • Fertility • Stock • Culture

source • mass • frequency • risk owner

POTUS

ACTION

RESULT

HISTORY

norm • scientific boundary • alarm

Responsible • Resource • Technology • Term

baseline • metric • uncertainty

Version • Solutions • Costs • Lessons

Who, on what basis and with what uncertainty has proved that the action changed the state of biocenosis?

Biocenosis monitoring point

CENTRAL BODY

ATMOSPHERE

WATER

SOIL

PLANTS

ANIMALS

MICROB

HUMANITY

LOADING

What's going on?

Natural Change or Dangerous Deviation?

Where's the source?

What is the effect on biocenosis and humans?

What to do now and how to check the result?

HOURS: ACCIDENT • SEASONS: START • YEARS: BIORISE

EQUILIBRIUM: from observation to proven effect

ARCHITECTURE

OBSERVATION

Sensors • Satellites • Laboratory

MODEL

Digital Double •

NORMA

threshold • right • data sovereignty

DECISION

priority • measure • cost of inaction

RESOURCE

budget • ECO‑PPA • PPP

EXECUTION

SPECZASHCHITA • O&M • control

PROOF

Ledger • before/after • audit

Federal protocol: data remains under national control; parties share agreed indicators, models and evidence.

3 × 13 × 19 = 741

MATHEMATICS

19 balances do not allow to "clean" one layer at the price of the other

741 - control positions of engineering completeness, and not 741 separate metric.

Scale × Life Cycle Phases × Balance Sheets

NATURE

RESOURCES

water • soil • Atmosphere • Biota • Microbiome • carbon • Nutrients

energy • materials/waste • land use • food

HUMANITY

TRUST

Health • Employment • Culture • Economy

Right • Security • Data • Intergenerational Effect

Check question: Has the short-term effect been bought at the expense of a neighbouring balance or a future generation?

13 phases: from signal to adjustment

CYCLE

SIGNAL

QUALITY

CONTACTS

SOURCE

RISK

POTUS

DECISION

LAW

RESOURCE

ACTION

CONTROL

RESULT

CORRECTION

Emergency reset — clock • Soil — seasons • Biodiversity — years

Not the same speed, but the discipline of proof.

Joint contour without loss of national responsibility

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC COUNCIL

Mandate • Priorities • Framework

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL COUNCIL

methods • Models • Uncertainty

OFFICE OF GANGAPILOT + RUSSIAN POLYGON

operational execution and comparable verification

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION + SOCIETY

quality • conflict of interest • local knowledge

The algorithm recommends • The man makes a decision • The Authority is responsible • Laboratory confirms • Society sees clear evidence

Six joint programmes 2026–2030

PORTFOLIO

GANG: WATER +

GANG - VOLGA

ARCTIC — GIMALAI

Flagship • 12 KPI

Pool School

cryosphere • water • risk

FORESTS AND FIRE

AGROPOCHOV

CITIES AND WASTE

Early Warning

N/P • Carbon • Crop

showers • heat • plastic

ORDER: First one real Ganga creation - then transfer the verified protocol.

2026–2030: from one creation to a compatible network

ROAD MAP

0–100 DAYS

4–12 MES.

12–24 MES.

24–36 MES.

36–48 MES.

Mandate • created • passport • 12 KPI

Sensors • QA/QC • MVP Doppelganger

water + soil + waste + biota

Ganges-Volga • Arctic-Himalaya

federated network • method catalog

CRITERIA OF TRANSITION

The new stage is funded only after independent verification of the previous one.

First package for 100 days

DECISION

Appoint a Joint Group

Select a Ganges site

within the existing mechanisms of science, climate and economics

urban + industrial + agricultural pressure; available data NMCG

Selecting a Russian Campground

Fix baseline

reference methods of monitoring, cleaning, soil and evidence

one technique • seasonality • control • data rights

Run three quick packages

Prepare ECO-PPA

Sources • water/purification • soil/agricultural

availability + action + confirmed result + O&M

FINISH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERMEDIATE PILOT PASSPORT

"Gang: water - soil - biocenosis" + appoint Russian and Indian coordinators for joint feasibility study

Sources cited in presentation 8

  • https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2199494&lang=2&reg=3
  • https://government.ru/info/54308/
  • https://nmcg.nic.in/NamamiGanga.aspx
  • [/Sources]
  • https://fsi.nic.in/gallery&type=166
  • https://moef.gov.in/storage/tender/1728110920.pdf
  • https://nmcg.nic.in/AboutBio.aspx
  • https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2150716&lang=2&reg=3

Published files

BRICS FIS · Full published text

Instructions for Joining the FATUM Game

Source Status: Primary Document

Step-by-step instructions for creating two accounts, inviting a player and starting a game of FATUM on the test gaming website named in the source document.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/instruktsiya-podklyucheniya-k-igre-fatum

Open on the site
  • 1. Create two accounts in the system https://stage.thefatum.com/ ( right at the top click on

"Create an account"

  • 2. Enter the registration data in the account, then click "Continue",

a successful registration message will appear (after that, if you want to create a game later, you also need to create a second user)

  • 3. Click on "Enter"
  • 4. After logging in, you need to go to the Community/Players page, where you can

search for the login of the second user you created

  • 5. After the user is found, click "Invite to the game"
  • 6. The second user must go to the "Community/Notifications/

New invitations: 1"

  • 7. Choose the invitation you receive and accept it (the one who accepted the invitation,

will automatically go to the game page)

  • 8. The second player needs to go to page https://stage.thefatum.com/play

Published files

BRICS FIS · Full published text

Integration Activities of the BRICS International Federation of Intellectual Games

Source Status: Primary Document

A presentation of the mission and activities of the BRICS International Federation of Intellectual Games: promoting games, education, finding and supporting young players, and international cooperation.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/integratsionnaya-deyatelnost-mfii-briks

Open on the site

the BRICS Intellectual Games Federation

Savoy Alexander Gennadievich,

Director of the Center for Intellectual Games of the International Scientific

Research Institute of Management Problems,

Vice-President of the International Alliance of BRICS Strategic Projects,

President of the International Federation of Intellectual Games BRICS

MISSION

the International Federation of INTELLECTUAL BRICS Games

Uniting the interests of different segments of the population of the world through

the formation of a socially oriented paradigm of thinking of the young generation through intellectual games as a tool for education and education of the young generation chess tavreli xianqi fatum weizi (go) checkers

MAIN TASKS

the International Federation of INTELLECTUAL BRICS Games

Popularization of intellectual games of the BRICS countries with the support of bodies

the state authorities, scientists, culture and art of the BRICS countries: Indian classical chess, Russian chess tavreli, Chinese chess xiantsi, chess countries

BRICS fatum, Chinese weizi (go), checkers (Brazilian, checkers, Russian, international)

Identification of the most intellectually developed players among children and young people,

financial support and creation of conditions for their further personal growth

Attracting the attention of the general public of the BRICS countries (representatives of the bodies)

to the question of the need to develop a systematic approach in the educational process to educate children, youth, students, adults, people with disabilities intellectual games that form skills that contribute to systemic adaptation in a rapidly changing social environment

RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

CENTER OF INTELLECTUAL GAMES OF INIIP

MNIIPU

Intellectual games Intellectual games Formation of new

as a tool as an element of education of neural connections in public diplomacy and education of young players in the generation of intellectual games

Intellectual games Influence Psychotype and

as a tool for intellectual games of psychological implementation of international educational-worldviews of children and employees, cultural and educational-teenagers organizations playing in television and sports intellectual games projects

Intellectual games: Intellectual Development of methods

from kindergarten to play in the educational teaching of professional and educational intellectual sports games processes

INTEGRATION PROJECTS

International Integration Project Interregional Integration Projects

"Ecosystem of intellectual elite" "Intellectual games as a tool for upbringing and education of the younger generation" and "Intellectual games as a tool for forming an intellectual elite"

INFRASTRUCTURE

1 2 3

Educational centers "Corporate intellectual Children and adults regional,

Intellectual Games and Game”: educational, training and national and international clubs for children, youth, tournament events on intellectual games of students, adults, persons with intellectual games within the BRICS countries with limited opportunities in the organization and with other BRICS countries organizations, including public authorities and diplomatic corps

FATUM

RUSSIAN INTELLECTUAL GAME OF BRICS COUNTRIES:

DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD PREMIER

MNIIPU

Game "Fatum", developed in Russia on the basis of the International

Intergovernmental organization "International Research Institute of Management Problems", is a unique quintessence of chess with elements of other intellectual games of the BRICS countries. It opens up an amazing and unique world of opportunities for the development of intelligence, the strengthening of intuition, the formation of creative and non-stereotypical thinking, the improvement of concentration skills.

"Fatum", if played regularly, allows you to significantly develop the intellectual abilities of a person, including memory, logic, abstract thinking, intuition, as well as acquire qualities such as caution, accuracy, foresight, etc. for systemic adaptation to an ever-changing social environment, ensuring material well-being and status in society.

Radisson Collection

Hotel, Moscow,

13.04.2021

ACTIVITIES

CONDUCTED

FATUM

RUSSIAN INTELLECTUAL GAME OF BRICS COUNTRIES: INRIP

DEVELOPMENT AND PROSPECTS

Festival of sports - Sabinsky Championship Master class on the game "Cup Rublevka" in the shopping center

logical games "Vladimir district of the Republic of Tatarstan "Fatum" students of the Gymnasium "Dream House", Barvikha, Open-2021", 04.08.2021 – the E Chess Memory M. Primakov, 10.09.2022 13.08.2021 N. M. Minnikhanov, 26.03.2022 13.05.2022

RECOMMENDATIONS

BRIC STATES PUBLIC AUTHORITIES

Inclusion in the training schedule

the main general education information campaign in the BRICS Weekly Hour countries that regular intellectual games training on intellectual sports games contribute to

Development of standards for

the intellectual development of children and the teaching of intellectual youth games and the approval of their

Creation on television and

Development of passport

radio stations of children and adults of the specialty "coach - programs for popularization teacher on intellectual games, coverage of their intellectual games" and in print and electronic media approval of its

WE INVITE YOU TO PARTICIPATE

IN THE FORMATION OF ECOSYSTEMS

INTELLECTUAL ELITE!

CONTACTS

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION

INTELLECTUAL BRICS GAMES

123001, Moscow, Three-Prudny per.,

  • 11/13, page 2

+7 (495) 177-20-20 info@mfiibrics.org

THANKS

FOR ATTENTION!

Published files

BRICS FIS · Full published text

BRICS INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF INTELLECTUAL GAMES

Source Status: Primary Document

A 2021 resource about the BRICS International Federation of Intellectual Games, its stated mission, games and plans for tournaments and an award. Historical dates and plans are preserved as presented in the source edition.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/mezhdunarodnaya-federatsiya-intellektualnykh-igr-briks

Open on the site

BRICS

INTELLECTUAL GAMES

SaNV

International Alliance

BRICS

MOCKBA, 2021

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION

BRICS

INTELLECTUAL GAMES

International Alliance

BRICS

21 December 2020

15 February 2021

It took place

International Federation

Constituent Assembly

BRICS Intellectual Games

the International Federation

the BRICS Intellectual Games

the Russian Federation

FATUM

Tavrels

ACTIVITIES

INTERNATIONAL

FEDERATION

INTELLECTUAL

BRICS Games

SHAHMATS

VEICI

SENDED TO

POPULARIZATION

INTELLECTUAL

BRICS COUNTRIES GAME

PACHISI

SYANTZI

CHAIRS

CHECKERS

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION

INTELLECTUAL BRICS GAMES

to contribute to the formation of a socially oriented paradigm of thinking of the younger generation, to unite the interests of different segments of the population of the world, to provide equal opportunities for each inhabitant of the planet to regularly increase the level of their own intelligence by participating in online and offline tournaments and championships

MFII is the initiator of the annual

the BRICS National Award

"THE BEST INTELLECTUAL GAME OF THE YEAR", designed to support and popularize new intellectual games developed in the BRICS countries

The presentation of the award will take place

15 February 2022

MAIN

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GAME

"FATUM" FORM

A NEW MODEL OF THINKING

Intellectual and sports game

"FATUM" - a unique quintessence

  • • Adaptation to ever-changing conditions

chess and other board games

  • • Intuition enhancement
  • • Improvisation

Number of players - 2

  • • Sharpening the flexibility of thinking

Includes elements of strategy and tactics

Expands players' consciousness

  • • Formation of non-stereotypic thinking

Promotes human development

  • • Development of creative thinking

skills that have been acquired worldwide

  • • Manifestation of individual thinking

the Davos Economic Forum in 2020

Defined as “competences of the future”

  • • Multivariate Action Ranking
  • • Creates opportunities to be
  • • Development of focus skills

A specialist in many

  • • Application of acquired skills and experience

professional areas in accordance with the solution of life problems with modern trends

International Championships

will be held exclusively in the BRICS countries with the involvement of players from many countries of the world

World Championships

will be held in the country that chairs the BRICS

For 5 years

Each BRICS member country will be able to organize and hold its championship in each of the 5 time periods.

AWARDS

WINNERS

INTERNATIONAL

CHAMPIONSHIP

by game "FATUM"

Precious coin weighing in

35 grams, made of gold 999 samples, with stamps of the manufacturer and the Federal Assay Chamber

AWARDS

SILVER

PRIZEERS

INTERNATIONAL

CHAMPIONSHIP

by game "FATUM"

Precious Coin

weighing 21 grams, made of silver 999 samples, with the stamps of the manufacturer and the Federal Assay Chamber

AWARDS

BRONZE

PRIZEERS

INTERNATIONAL

CHAMPIONSHIP

by game "FATUM"

A worthless coin.

weighing 18 grams

SUVENIRAL PRODUCTS

SYMBOLIC GAME

"FATUM"

MEMORIAL

MOHETA

VISDO

"FATUM"

SUVENIRAL PRODUCTS

SYMBOLIC GAME

"FATUM"

MEMORIAL

MONETA

"LEADER"

SUVENIRAL PRODUCTS

SYMBOLIC GAME

"FATUM"

MEMORIAL

MONETA

"ACT"

AWARDS

PRIZEERS

INTERNATIONAL

CHAMPIONSHIP

by game "FATUM"

Chest

sign "Golden Fatum", made of gold 750, with the stamps of the manufacturer and the Federal Assay Chamber

Cup "Golden Fatum",

Cup

Cup

Plated with 24 microns gold "Silver Fatum" "Bronze Fatum"

AWARDS

PRIZEERS

TOURNAMENTS AND

CHAMPIONSHIP

by game "FATUM"

INTERNATLONA

All detailed information about

Intellectual - Sports

BRICS

The game "Fatum" will be placed

International Alliance

on the website: www.TheFatum.com

International Federation

BRICS Intellectual Games www.MFIIBRICS.org, www.TheFatum.com Info@MFIIBRICS.org, Fatum@MFIIBRICS.org 119351, Mr. Moscow, Vernadsky Ave., d. 29 +7 (495) 177-20-20

Other published edition: MOSCOW, 2021 4 MFII Eng new.pdf · Web Text +

T h e F o u n d i n g M e e t i n g o f t h e T h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n o f

I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n o f B R I C S I n t e l l e c t u a l G a m e s

B R I C S I n t e l l e c t u a l G a m e s w a s r e g i s t e r e d i n t h e

w a s h e l d R u s s i a n F e d e r a t i o n

FATUM TAVRELI

T H E A C T I V I T I E S O F

THE INTERNATIONAL

FEDERATION OF BRICS

INTELLECTUAL GAMES

CHESS WEIQI

I S A I M E D A T

P O P U L A R I Z I N G T H E

I N T E L L E C T U A L G A M E S

O F B R I C S C O U N T R I E S

PACHISI XIANGQ I

DRAUGHTS CHECKERS

I N T E R N A T I O N A L F E D E R A T I O N O F

B R I C S I N T E L L E C T U A L G A M E S

The Federation is designed to promote the formation of a socially

oriented paradigm of thinking of the younger generation, to unite the interests of various segments of the world population, to provide equal opportunities for every inhabitant of the planet to regularly improve their own intelligence by participating in online and offline tournaments and championships

The Federation is the initiator of the annual

National Award

"BEST INTELLECTUAL GAME, which is designed to support

OF THE YEAR"

and popularize new intellectual games created in BRICS countries

The presentation of the Award will

take place on

FEBRUARY 15, 2022

KEY GAME FEATURES

“FATUM” FORMS A NEW

MODEL OF THINKING

Adaptation to constantly changing conditions

Strengthening intuition

Manifestation of improvisation

Number of players – 2

Honing the flexibility of thinking

Includes elements of strategy and tactics

Expands the consciousness of players The formation of non-stereotypical thinking

Contributes to the development of The development of creative thinking

person’s skills, which were defined as “the

Manifestation of individual thinking

competences of the future” after the

World Economic Forum in Davos, 2020 Ranking of multivariability of actions

Creates opportunities to be a highly Development of concentration skills

demanded specialist in many professional

Application of acquired skills and experience

fields in accordance with modern trends in solving life problems

The International Championships

will be held exclusively in BRICS countries with the involvement of players from many countries of the world

The World Championships

will be held in the country presiding over the BRICS

Association

Within five years, each country

participating in the BRICS Association will be able to organize its own championship in turn

AWARDS FOR

WINNERS

THE INTERNATIONAL

CHAMPIONSHIPS IN

THE GAME “FATUM”

Precious coin weighing 33 grams made

of 999 fine gold with the hallmarks of the manufacturer and the Federal

Assay Office of Russia

AWARDS FOR

SILVER WINNERS

THE INTERNATIONAL

CHAMPIONSHIPS IN

THE GAME “FATUM”

Precious coin weighing 21 grams made

of 999 silver with the hallmarks of the manufacturer and the Federal Assay

Office of Russia

AWARDS FOR

BRONZE WINNERS

THE INTERNATIONAL

CHAMPIONSHIPS IN

THE GAME “FATUM”

Non-precious coin weighing 18 grams

SOUVENIR PRODUCTS

WITH THE SYMBOL OF

THE GAME “FATUM”

M E M O R I A L

C O I N

“ F A T U M ”

SOUVENIR PRODUCTS

WITH THE SYMBOL OF

THE GAME “FATUM”

M E M O R I A L

C O I N

“ L E A D E R ”

SOUVENIR PRODUCTS

WITH THE SYMBOL OF

THE GAME “FATUM”

M E M O R I A L

C O I N

“ A C T ”

A W A R D S F O R

P R I Z E W I N N E R S

T H E I N T E R N A T I O N A L

C H A M P I O N S H I P S I N

T H E G A M E “ F A T U M ”

“Golden Fatum” badge made of 750 gold with the hallmarks of the manufacturer and the Federal Assay Office of Russia

“Golden Fatum” “Silver Fatum” “Bronze Fatum”

Cup covered with 24 microns gold Cup Cup

AWARDS FOR

PRIZEWINNERS

TOURNAMENTS AND

CHAMPIONSHIPS IN

THE GAME “FATUM”

wwwwww..TThheeFFaattuumm..ccoomm

International Federation of

BRICS Intelle ctual Games

www.MFIIBRICS.org, www.TheFatum.com Info@MFIIBRICS.org, Fat u m @MFIIBRICS.org 29, Vernadsky Ave., Moscow, Russia, 119331 +7 (495) 177 20 20

Published files

  • 4 MFII Rus new.pdf (PDF)
    https://speczashchita.com/documents/knowledge/mezhdunarodnaya-federatsiya-intellektualnykh-igr-briks/source-01.pdf
  • 4 MFII Eng new.pdf (PDF)
    https://speczashchita.com/documents/knowledge/mezhdunarodnaya-federatsiya-intellektualnykh-igr-briks/source-02.pdf

BRICS FIS · Full published text

FIRST TRAINING TOURNAMENT IN THE MIND SPORT “FATUM”

Source Status: Primary Document

A presentation of the first training tournament in the game FATUM, held in Moscow on 13 April 2021, with event materials and stated plans for further championships.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/pervyy-trenirovochnyy-turnir-fatum-2021

Open on the site

IRIAS

International Alliance

FIRST TRAINING TOURNAMENT

ON INTELLECTUAL AND SPORTS GAME

"FATUM" MOSCOW, 13 April 2021

RADISSON COLLECTION HOTEL, MOSCOW

MATCHIN

OLEG

VASYLEVICH

SPORTS MINISTER

RUSSIAN

FEDERATION

Development of sports cooperation in the space

BRICS remains a priority

Ministry of Sports of the Russian Federation...

I am very pleased that among the initiatives of the

the BRICS Strategic Projects Alliance

The sports agenda...

I believe that the launch of intellectual and sports

“Fatum” games will give a new impetus to strategic cooperation on the BRICS platform.

12 April 2021

MOSCOW, 13 April

2021 H. IN THE HOTEL

RADISSON COLLECTION

HOTEL, MOSCOW

in the framework of the solemn ceremony on the occasion of the 5

the Alliance for Strategic

BRICS Projects and Start of Activities

International

Federation

Intellectual Games

BRICS IS

the world premiere of the intellectual and sports game "FATUM" and holding

First

training tournament on the game "FATUM".

International

FATUM championships will be held exclusively in the BRICS countries with the involvement of players from many countries of the world. During 5 years, each member country of the association will be able to organize and hold its championship in each of 5 time periods.

the First Training Tournament

intellectual and sports game "Fatum" was attended by 8 international grandmasters

FIDE Classic Chess

of the 8 federal districts of Russia:

FATUM

Artur Gabrielyan

Champion SKFO 2013-2016 G., Champion of SFD 2020 St Petersburg.

Anton Shomoev

Winner of the Russian Cup in Izhevsk 2012

Nikita Petrov

Winner of international tournaments "Arco" 2016,

2017, 2019, Lisbon 2018, Mersin 2019

Pavel Ponkratov

Champion of Russia in fast chess 2015, champion of Russia in blitz 2019, winner of TOP 16 of the Grand Prix of Russia in fast chess 2016 and 2018.

Maxim Chigaev

Winner of the Russian Championship League 2020.

Ernesto Inarkiev

European champion 2016

Vladimir Fedoseev

Vice-champion of the world in fast chess 2017

Alexander Predke

Winner of the Russian Championship League 2019.

GABRIELYAN

ARTUR VLADIMIROVICH

GROSSMASTER

RECEIVED A NAME IN 2009 G.

REGION

NORTH KAVKAZ FEDERAL

OKRUG (SKFO)

CHAMPION SKFO - 2013-2016 GG.

MAIN

CHAMPION OF YUFO - 2020

ACHIEVEMENTS

WINNER OF INTERNATIONAL

TOURNAMENT "VORONEZH - 2012"

RATING

2448 (1358 PLACE IN THE WORLD)

FIDE

Shomoev

ANTON VIACHESLAVOVICH

GROSSMASTER

RECEIVED A NAME IN 2002 G.

REGION

FURTHER EASTERN FEDERAL

OKRUG (DFO)

1-E PLACE, STAGE OF THE CUP OF RUSSIA,

MAIN

  • Mr. IZHEVSK - 2012

ACHIEVEMENTS

2-EVEN A PLACE, WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP AMONG STUDENTS - 2002 G G.

RATING

FIDE

2563 (384 PLACE IN THE WORLD)

PETROV

NIKITA VIKTOROVICH

GROSSMASTER

RECEIVED A NAME IN 2018 G.

REGION

SOUTH FEDERAL AROUND

(SFD)

MAIN

WINNER OF INTERNATIONAL

ACHIEVEMENTS

TOURNAMENTS "ARKO" 2016, 2017, 2019 GG., "LISSABON" 2018 G., "MERSIN" 2019 G.

RATING

FIDE

2567 (359 PLACE IN THE WORLD)

PONCRATOV

PAVEL ANDREEVICH

GROSSMASTER

RECEIVED A NAME IN 2012 G.

REGION

URAL FEDERAL AROUND

(UFO)

CHAMPION OF RUSSIA ON FAST

SHAHMATAM - 2015

MAIN

ACHIEVEMENTS

CHAMPION OF RUSSIA BY BLITZ - 2019

WINNER TOP-16 GRAND PRI RUSSIA

BY QUICK SHAHMATS - 2016, 2018 GG.

RATING

2619 (174 PLACE IN THE WORLD)

FIDE

CHIGAE

MAXIM KONSTANTINOVICH

GROSSMASTER

RECEIVED A NAME IN 2016 G.

REGION

SIBERIAN FEDERAL AROUND

(SFO)

WINNER OF THE HIGH LEAGUE

CHAMPIONSHIP OF RUSSIA - 2020

THE DIFFERENT WINNERS AND

MAIN

THE PRIZE OF RUSSIAN CUPS AND STAGES

RAPID GRAND PRI RUSSIA

ACHIEVEMENTS

SHAHMATAM

WINNER OF THE WORLD

YUNOSHESKAYA SHAHMATNA

OLYMPIADES - 2012

RATING

FIDE

2631 (135 PLACE IN THE WORLD)

INARKYEV

ERNESTO KAZBEKOVICH

GROSSMASTER

RECEIVED A NAME IN 2002 G.

REGION

CENTRAL FEDERAL AROUND

CHAMPION OF EUROPE - 2016

from July 2005 STABILIZED IN B

MAIN

100 THE BEST SHAME MATERIALS OF THE WORLD

ACHIEVEMENTS

FIDE RATING

CHAMPION OF RUSSIA ON FAST

SHAHMATAM AS A COLLECTIVE

mOSKW - 2015

RATING

FIDE

2654 (89 PLACE IN THE WORLD)

FEDOSEEV

VLADIMIR VASILYEVICH

GROSSMASTER

RECEIVED A NAME IN 2011 G.

NORTH-WEST

REGION

FEDERAL AROUND

(SFD)

MAIN

VICE-CHAMPION OF THE WORLD FOR FAST

SHAHMATAM - 2017

ACHIEVEMENTS

FOUR FINAL CHAMPIONSHIPS

PEACE ON THE SCHEDULES OF FISHER - 2019 G.

RATING

2687 (49 PLACE IN THE WORLD)

FIDE

Predke

ALEXANDER ALEXANDROVICH

GROSSMASTER

RECEIVED A NAME IN 2016 G.

REGION

PRIVOLGIAN FEDERAL AROUND

(PFO)

WINNER OF THE HIGH LEAGUE

MAIN

CHAMPIONSHIP OF RUSSIA - 2019

ACHIEVEMENTS

SILVER PRIZE OF THE TEAM

CHAMPIONSHIP OF RUSSIA - 2020

RATING

2690 (45 PLACE IN THE WORLD)

FIDE

President of International

the Federation of Intellectual Property

BRICS Games and FIDE International Grandmasters in Classical Chess

the International Alliance of BRICS Strategic Projects,

Solemn ceremony on the occasion of the 5 anniversary

the International Federation of BRICS Intellectual Games and the First training tournament on the intellectual and sports game "Fatum"

STION OF B

The first training

intellectual-sports game tournament "FATUM" table 3

Prize-winners

the First Training Tournament

the intellectual and sports game "FATUM" I place - "Golden Fatum"

Pavel Ponkratov

Second place — “Silver Fatum”

Nikita Petrov

III place - "Bronze Fatum"

Ernesto Inarkiev

Honorary guests

Russia’s Sherpa in BRICS, Deputy

Russian Foreign Minister S.A. Ryabkov E.P. Ambassador of Brazil to Russia

  • T. da Silva Nunes

E.P. Ambassador of India to Russia d.B. Venkatesh Varma the International Federat E.P. Ambassador of Qatar to Russia Sheikh A. Ben Nasser Al-Thani E.P. Ambassador of Indonesia to Russia

  • H. Morato Tavares

Honorary guests

Multiple Champion

Governor

World Chess Championship

Kemerovo Region - Kuzbass

A.E. Karpov S.E. Tsivilev

International Federation

Intellectual Games

BRICS

www.MFIIBRICS.org www.TheFatum.com +7 (495) 177 - 20 - 20 Info @MFIIBRICS.org Fatum@MFIIBRICS.org 119331, Mr. Moscow, prospekt

Vernadsky,

  • d. 29

Other published edition: MOSCOW, APRIL 13, 2021 5 Tournament 13.04.2021 Eng new.pdf · Web Text +

R A D I S S O N C O L L E C T I O N H O T E L, M O S C O W

The development of sports cooperation in BRICS remains

one of the priority areas of work of the Ministry of Sports...

I’m very glad that the sports agenda h a s a p p e a r e d a m ong

initiatives of the International Alliance of BRICS Strategic Projects...

I expect that the launch of the intellectual and sports game

“Fatum” will give a new impetus to strategic interaction on the platform of BRICS.

APRIL 12, 2021

MOSCOW, APRIL 13, 2021

A CEREMONY TOOK PLACE

AT THE RADISSON

COLLECTION HOTEL,

MOSCOW

to mark the 5th anniversary of the

International Alliance of

BRICS Strategic Projects

and the launch of the

International Federation of

BRICS Intellectual Games,

holding the world premiere of the intellectual and sports game “FATUM” and its First training tournament.

International

championships in the game “FATUM” will be held exclusively in

BRICS countries with the involvement

of players from many countries of the world.

Within five years, each country participating in the Association

will be able to organize its own championship in turn.

The First training tournament in the

intellectual and sports game “FATUM” was attended by eight FIDE international grandmasters in classical chess from eight federal districts of Russia:

Artur GABRIELYAN

Champion of the North-Caucasus Federal District (2013-

2016), Champion of the Southern Federal District (2020)

Anton SHOMOEV

Winner of the Russian Cup stage in Izhevsk (2012)

Nikita PETROV

Winner of the international tournaments in Arco (2016,

2017, 2019), Lisbon (2018) and Mersin (2019)

Pavel PONKRATOV

Champion of Russia in rapid chess (2015), Champion of

Russia in blitz (2019), Winner of the TOP-16 Grand Prix of

Russia in rapid chess (2016, 2018)

Maxim CHIGAEV

Winner of the Higher League of the Russian

Championship (2020)

Ernesto INARKIEV

Champion of Europe (2016)

Vladimir FEDOSEEV

Vice World Champion in rapid chess (2017)

Alexander PREDKE

Winner of the Higher League of the Russian

Championship (2019)

A R T U R

G A B R I E L Y A N

GRANDMASTER

RECEIVED THE TITLE IN 2009

REGION NORTH-CAUCASUS FEDERAL DISTRICT

CHAMPION OF THE NORTH-CAUCASUS

FEDERAL DISTRICT (2013-2016)

MAIN

ACHIEVEMENTS CHAMPION OF THE SOUTHERN FEDERAL

DISTRICT (2020)

WINNER OF THE INTERNATIONAL

TOURNAMENT “VORONEZH – 2012”

FIDE

2448 (1358 IN THE WORLD)

RATING

A N T O N

S H O M O E V

GRANDMASTER

RECEIVED THE TITLE IN 2002

REGION FAR-EASTERN FEDERAL DISTRICT

1ST PLACE, RUSSIAN CUP STAGE IN

IZHEVSK (2012)

MAIN

ACHIEVEMENTS

2ND PLACE, WORLD STUDENTS

CHAMPIONSHIP (2002)

FIDE

2563 (384 IN THE WORLD)

RATING

N I K I T A

P E T R O V

GRANDMASTER

RECEIVED THE TITLE IN 2018

REGION SOUTHERN FEDERAL DISTRICT

WINNER OF THE INTERNATIONAL

MAIN

TOURNAMENTS IN ARCO (2016, 2017, 2019),

ACHIEVEMENTS

LISBON (2018), MERSIN (2019)

FIDE

2567 (359 IN THE WORLD)

RATING

P A V E L

P O N K R A T O V

GRANDMASTER

RECEIVED THE TITLE IN 2012

REGION URAL FEDERAL DISTRICT

CHAMPION OF RUSSIA IN RAPID CHESS

(2015)

MAIN

CHAMPION OF RUSSIA IN BLITZ (2019)

ACHIEVEMENTS

WINNER OF THE TOP-16 GRAND PRIX OF

RUSSIA IN RAPID CHESS (2016, 2018)

FIDE

2619 (174 IN THE WORLD)

RATING

M A X I M

C H I G A E V

GRANDMASTER

RECEIVED THE TITLE IN 2016

REGION SIBERIAN FEDERAL DISTRICT

WINNER OF THE HIGHER LEAGUE OF THE

RUSSIAN CHAMPIONSHIP (2020)

MAIN

MULTIPLE WINNER AND PRIZEWINNER OF

ACHIEVEMENTS THE RUSSIAN CUPS AND STAGES OF THE

RUSSIAN GRAND PRIX IN RAPID CHESS

WORLD JUNIOR CHESS OLYMPIAD WINNER

(2012)

FIDE

2631 (135 IN THE WORLD)

RATING

E R N E S T O

I N A R K I E V

GRANDMASTER

RECEIVED THE TITLE IN 2002

REGION CENTRAL FEDERAL DISTRICT

CHAMPION OF EUROPE (2016)

FROM JULY 2005 - STABLE IN THE 100 BEST

CHESS PLAYERS OF THE WORLD BY FIDE

MAIN

RATING

ACHIEVEMENTS

CHAMPION OF RUSSIA IN RAPID CHESS,

MOSCOW TEAM (2015)

FIDE

2654 (89 IN THE WORLD)

RATING

V L A D I M I R

F E D O S E E V

GRANDMASTER

RECEIVED THE TITLE IN 2011

REGION NORTH-WESTERN FEDERAL DISTRICT

VICE WORLD CHAMPION IN RAPID

MAIN CHESS (2017)

ACHIEVEMENTS

QUARTER FINAL OF THE WORLD

CHAMPIONSHIP IN FISHER CHESS (2019)

FIDE

2687 (49 IN THE WORLD)

RATING

A L E X A N D E R

P R E D K E

GRANDMASTER RECEIVED THE TITLE IN 2016

REGION VOLGA FEDERAL DISTRICT

WINNER OF THE HIGHER LEAGUE OF THE

MAIN RUSSIAN CHAMPIONSHIP (2019)

ACHIEVEMENTS

SILVER WINNER OF THE RUSSIAN TEAM

CHAMPIONSHIP (2020)

FIDE

2690 (45 IN THE WORLD)

RATING

President of the International

Federation of BRICS Intellectual

Games and FIDE International

Grandmasters in Classical Chess

The First training tournament

in the intellectual and sports game “FATUM”

Prizewinners of

the First training tournament in the intellectual and sports game “FATUM” 1st place and “Golden Fatum”

Pavel PONKRATOV

2nd place and “Silver Fatum”

Nikita PETROV

3rd place and “Bronze Fatum”

Ernesto INARKIEV

GUESTS OF HONOR

Sherpa of Russia in BRICS, Deputy

Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia

S.A. RYABKOV H.E. Ambassador of Brazil to Russia

  • T. DA SILVA NUNES

H.E. Ambassador of India to Russia D.B. VENKATESH VARMA H.E. Ambassador of Qatar to Russia Sheikh A. BIN NASSER AL-THANI H.E. Ambassador of Indonesia to Russia

  • H. MORATO TAVARES

GUESTS OF HONOR

Multiple World Chess Champion Governor of the Kemerovo Region – Kuzbass

A.E. KARPOV S.E. TSIVILEV

International Federation of

BRICS Intellectual Games

w w w. M F I I B R I C S. o r g w w w. T h e F a t u m. c o m + 7 ( 4 9 5 ) 1 7 7 2 0 2 0 I n f o @ MFIIBRICS. org Fatum@MFIIBRICS.org 2 9, V e r n a d s k y A v e.,

Moscow, Russia, 119331

Published files

Cooperation · Full published text

Trade Union 4.0. A National Digital Ecosystem for Workers’ Development

Source Status: Primary Document

National Programme for the Modernization of the Trade Union Movement

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/profsoyuz-4-0

Open on the site

Strategic Concept to 2035

Version 1.0 • 2026

1. Summary

“Trade Union 4.0” is a model of the new generation trade union movement, in which the trade union retains its basic function of protecting labor rights, but at the same time becomes an institution for the development of labor, an operator of social services, a participant in improving productivity, a competence center and an equal partner of the state and employers.

The key transition of the program: from the predominantly reactive protection of the interests of employees to the constant support of a person throughout the professional trajectory: training, employment, safety, health, income, participation in the improvement of the enterprise and social sustainability.

2. Strategic objective

To create by 2035 a modern, technological and economically sustainable system of trade unions that improves the quality of work and life, strengthens social partnership and provides employees with real participation in the development of enterprises, industries and territories.

3. Mission

To protect the dignity of the person of work and to create conditions under which work becomes a source of well-being, development, professional realization and public recognition.

4. Basic principles

  • Man is the main capital of the economy.
  • Legality, transparency and evidentiary decisions.
  • Partnership instead of chronic confrontation.
  • Continuous development of competencies.
  • Digital availability of trade union services.
  • Equal access to protection and social opportunities.
  • Responsibility of employer, employee and state.
  • Measurability of results and social effect.

5. The new role of the trade union

The union 4.0 simultaneously performs seven functions:

  • Defender of labor and social rights;
  • mediator and negotiation platform;
  • competence development center;
  • operator of social and corporate programs;
  • participant of increase in productivity and safety of work;
  • Institute of Public Control;
  • Employee participation platform in enterprise development.

6. Architecture of the Trade Union 4.0

6.1. The Digital Core

  • a digital trade union ticket and a single account;
  • personal cabinet of a trade union member;
  • electronic appeals and legal advice;
  • electronic voting and polling;
  • register of collective agreements and agreements;
  • analytics of appeals, risks and working conditions.

6.2. the Center for the Protection of Rights

  • legal assistance and representation;
  • mediation and pre-trial settlement;
  • Support for collective bargaining;
  • Model legal documents and digital legal assistant.

6.3. Human Development Center

  • diagnostics of professional competencies;
  • Individual educational trajectories;
  • retraining and advanced training;
  • Mentoring, career navigation and personnel reserve.

6.4. Occupational Safety Center

  • digital monitoring of working conditions;
  • assessment of production risks;
  • prevention of injuries and occupational diseases;
  • public audit of labor protection;
  • Application of analytics and AI for early detection of risks.

6.5. The social ecosystem

  • Health and prevention;
  • insurance and pension programs;
  • Family and housing support;
  • sports, recreation and sanatorium programs;
  • Financial literacy and counselling.

6.6. The Economics of Participation

  • mechanisms of participation of employees in the results of the enterprise;
  • Innovation and internal initiatives;
  • social entrepreneurship and cooperation;
  • Corporate long-term motivation programs.

6.7. Analytical outline

  • the labor environment quality index;
  • Rating of socially responsible employers;
  • monitoring of wages, turnover and staff shortages;
  • Evaluate the social impact of collective bargaining.

7. Seven Platforms of the Trade Union 4.0

PlatformPurposeKey services
ProtectionLegal security of the employeeLawyers, mediation, appeals, collective bargaining
EducationIncreased competenceAcademy, retraining, AI-skills, mentoring
CareerProfessional mobilityVacancies, portfolio, personnel reserve
HealthMaintenance of labour potentialPrevention, medicine, sports, psychology
ProsperitySocial sustainabilityInsurance, housing, family, financial literacy
InnovationsEmployee participation in production developmentAccelerator of initiatives, innovation
CommunitySolidarity and InvolvementClubs, youth councils, public projects

8. New Generation Collective Agreement

The union 4.0 proposes to expand the subject of the collective agreement. In addition to traditional guarantees, it may include:

  • mechanism of wage indexation;
  • indicators of safety and quality of the working environment;
  • Employer’s obligations to train employees;
  • Employee participation programs in productivity improvement;
  • corporate pension and insurance mechanisms;
  • AI and automation rules for personnel;
  • procedures of retraining in technological transformation;
  • Indicators of social impact.

9. Trade Union and Technological Transformation

Automation and artificial intelligence should not be seen solely as a source of staff reduction. The task of the union is to ensure a manageable transition: a preliminary assessment of the impact of technology on employment, retraining, the creation of new working roles and the equitable distribution of the effect of productivity growth.

10. Youth Contour

  • Youth trade union councils;
  • School of Young Leaders;
  • First workplace programs;
  • internships and mentoring;
  • competitions of production and social initiatives;
  • Digital community of young professionals.

11. Model of social partnership

The trade union 4.0 is based on four-way interaction:

  • workers and their associations;
  • employers and industry associations;
  • state and municipal bodies;
  • educational, scientific and social institutions.

The purpose of the system is to translate contradictions into the negotiation process, and common interests into joint programs on employment, productivity, labor protection, personnel training and development of territories.

12. Key performance indicators

IndicatorTarget orientationPeriod
Digital membershipup to 100% digital cabinet availability2030
Percentage of members with access to trainingnot less than 90%2030
Reduction of occupational injuriesat least 30% in the pilot circuit2030
New generation collective bargaining coverageat least 70% large organizations-participants2032
Satisfaction with trade union servicesnot less than 85%2030
Period of initial response to appealup to 24 hours in digital circuit2028
Percentage of organizations with re-training programmesat least 80% participants2032

13. Road map

Phase I. Design

0–6 months

  • Audit of the existing trade union infrastructure;
  • formation of a normative and organizational model;
  • development of digital platform architecture;
  • Selection of pilot industries and regions.

Phase II. Pilot

6–18 months

  • launch of a digital cabinet;
  • creation of competence centers;
  • introduction of new forms of collective agreement;
  • training of trade union assets.

Stage III. Scaling

18–36 months

  • connection of new industries and territories;
  • unified register of services and indicators;
  • development of employers’ rating;
  • Integration of educational and social programs.

Phase IV. The National System

3–5 years

  • common standards of the Trade Union 4.0;
  • cross-industry analytics;
  • scaling up best practices;
  • International cooperation and exchange of experience.

14. Organizational model

  • National Trade Union Coordinating Council 4.0.
  • Industry Competence Centers.
  • Regional project offices.
  • Corporate trade union teams.
  • Expert Council on Labour Law, Technology, Social Policy and Education.
  • Digital platform operator.

15. Financing

Funding for the program can be formed from a combination of:

  • membership fees;
  • target trade union funds;
  • joint programs with employers;
  • grants and development programs;
  • educational and service projects;
  • partner social programs.

The financial model should ensure transparency of expenditures, separation of trust funds and regular public reporting.

16. Risks and constraints

RiskReduction mechanism
Formalization of digitalizationEvaluate not the number of services, but their real use and effect.
Distrust of employeesTransparency of decisions, measurable results, feedback.
Conflict with employersMediation, joint KPI, industry agreements.
Lack of professional competenceSystemic training and certification.
Risks of personal data processingPrivacy-by-design, access delimitation, independent audit.
Inequality in regional developmentPilots, model solutions and federal methodological support.

17. Output expected

The result of the program will be a trade union system that is able to simultaneously protect the employee, increase his competence, help enterprises undergo technological transformation and create a sustainable model of social partnership. The trade union ceases to be perceived only as an institution of conflict resolution and becomes a permanent infrastructure for the development of human labor.

18. Trade Union Formula 4.0

PROTECTION → DEVELOPMENT → PARTICIPATION → WELFARE → PARTNERSHIP

19. Next level

At the next stage, the concept can be expanded into a package of three interrelated documents: the Trade Union Standard 4.0, the Regulation of the Digital Platform and the model Collective Agreement of the new generation. This will move from a concept to a practical implementation model.

Other published edition: Trade Union 4.0 Trade Union_4_0_Presentation.pptx · Web Text +

The National Digital Ecosystem for Human Labour Development

Strategic Concept • 2026

Why Trade Unions Need a Model 4.0

Work is changing faster than traditional institutions

Technology

Workforce

AI, automation and platform employment are changing professions and human requirements.

Lack of competence makes training and retention of employees a strategic task.

Trust

Partnerships

Employees need fast, transparent and really useful services - not just formal membership.

Businesses and the state need a mature social partner able to work with change.

TRADE UNION 4.0

Trade Union Mission 4.0

From protection to development, participation and well-being

To protect the dignity of the person of work and to create conditions under which work becomes a source of well-being, development, professional realization and public recognition.

PROTECTION

DEVELOPMENT

PARTICIPATION

WELFARE

rights and security

Competencies and career

Impact on the company

Health and Income

TRADE UNION 4.0

The new role of the trade union

Trade union becomes an infrastructure of professional life

Defender

Mediator

Navigator

Controller

Legal Aid and Representation

negotiations and settlement

training, career, competence

Social and Digital Services

Partner

Controller

Community

Productivity and enterprise development

working conditions and public audit

Solidarity and professional identity

TRADE UNION 4.0

Architecture of the Trade Union 4.0

Seven interrelated contours

Human development

The Digital Core

Occupational safety

MAN OF LABOUR

Protection of rights

The social ecosystem

The Economics of Participation

Analysis

TRADE UNION 4.0

The Digital Core

Single window of trade union services

• Digital trade union ticket

• Personal account

• Appeals and legal support

• Electronic voting

• Register of collective agreements

• Risk and referral analytics

Principle 1

One person - one digital profile - full access to services.

Principle 2

Service is measured by use and result, not by number of functions.

Principle 3

Personal data and accesses are designed on the principle of privacy-by-design.

TRADE UNION 4.0

The Seven Platforms

Full life cycle of human support

1. Protection

2. Education

3. Career

4. Health

lawyers • mediation • negotiations

Academy • retraining • AI-skills

Vacancies • portfolio • personnel reserve

Prevention • Medicine • Sports

5. Prosperity

6. Innovations

7. Community

insurance • housing • family

Initiatives • rationalization • accelerator

youth • clubs • public projects

TRADE UNION 4.0

New Generation Collective Agreement

From the document on benefits to the development agreement

Salary indexation

Safety and quality of the work environment

training and retraining

participation in productivity improvement

Pension and insurance programs

Application rules AI and automation

Retraining in technological changes

Measurable social impact indicators

TRADE UNION 4.0

AI and automation

The union must manage the transition, not block the technology

1 Evaluate impact

2 Agree rules

3 Retrain

4 Create new roles

5 Share effect

What roles disappear, change and emerge.

How technology is applied to staff.

Before the reduction of functions, not after.

Convert automation effect to higher quality employment.

Productivity growth should increase the sustainability of the employee and the enterprise.

TRADE UNION 4.0

Model of social partnership

The Four Sides: A Single Development Agenda

Employees

Employers

State

Science and education

Right • Feedback • Participation

Productivity • HR • investment

regulation • employment • social stability

Competence • Technology • New Professions

General Agenda: Employment • Productivity • Security • Training • Social Sustainability

TRADE UNION 4.0

KPI programs

Indicators should reflect the real effect for the person and the enterprise

100%

Accessibility of the Digital Cabinet

Access to training

Injuries in the Pilot Area

≤24 h

Major parties with new generation contracts

Satisfaction with services

Initial response to the appeal

TRADE UNION 4.0

Road map

From Pilot to National System

I. Design

II. Pilot

III. Scaling

IV. The National System

0–6 month. audit • Model • architecture • Pilots

6–18 Month of digital cabinet • Training • New treaties

18–36 Months of industry • regions • rating • Analytics

3–5 years of uniform standards • Intersectoral Network • international exchange

TRADE UNION 4.0

Organizational model

Management, examination and implementation

National Coordinating Council

Industry Competence Centers

Regional Project Offices

Strategy and common standards

methods and industry programs

implementation and scaling

Corporate Teams

Expert Council

Digital operator

Work with people and employer

Right • Technology • Social Policy

Platform • data • services

TRADE UNION 4.0

Key risks

Modernization should be managed and verified

Formal digitalization

Distrust of employees

Measure use and effect

transparency and feedback

Conflict with employers

Lack of competence

mediation and joint KPI

training and certification of professional assets

Data risks

Inequality of regions

privacy-by-design and audit

standard solutions and project offices

TRADE UNION 4.0

Target image

Trade Union 4.0 — permanent infrastructure of human development of labor

Not only to protect rights, but also to enhance a person’s ability to live, work, learn and influence the work environment.

PROTECTION

DEVELOPMENT

PARTICIPATION

WELFARE

PARTNERSHIP

TRADE UNION 4.0

Published files

BRICS FIS · Full published text

Establishing and developing a representative office of the BRICS International Federation of Intellectual Games and educational centres for mind sports in Turkey

Source Status: Primary Document

A proposal for a representative office of the BRICS International Federation of Intellectual Games and educational centres for mind sports in Turkey: mission, objectives, country franchise tools and forms of cooperation.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/predstavitelstvo-mfii-briks-v-turtsii

Open on the site

the International Federation of Intellectual Games BRICS

Educational Centers of Intellectual Sports

in Turkey

MISSION

the International Federation of INTELLECTUAL BRICS Games

The main objectives in the medium term are:

Formation of a socially oriented paradigm of young thinking

generations, uniting the interests of different segments of the population of the world, providing equal opportunities for each inhabitant of the planet to regularly improve their own intelligence through participation in online and offline tournaments and championships

Identifying the most intelligent players among children and

financial support and creation of conditions for their further personal growth

Building the consciousness of politicians and civil servants

termination of the game by the fates of the citizens of their countries and the resolution of conflicts behind chess and fate boards

COUNTRY

FRANCHISE

MNIIPU

We provide exclusive rights to use the following tools in

Information space of Turkey:

1 3 4

Copyrights Logos: FATUM, ANO "International Placement of Information on

"Fatum" BRICS Federation of Intellectual Games, ANO Representation on the website "International Alliance of BRICS Strategic MFI Projects", International

Image Methods of teaching games

intergovernmental organization of the Fatum board with "Fatum", "chess", "xianzi", "International research figures "Weizi", "Chess" Institute of management problems"

6 11 14

Video courses on learning games Development option "Corporate Installation in Turkey's parks"

"Fatum", "chess", "xianzi", intellectual game", that is, "Public Fatums" with figures in "weizi", "chess" conducting training, human growth training and tournament 7 15

Conducting research on intellectual activities Using corporate identity and

the formation of new neural games within the organization and with other attributes of the BRICS IFII: cups, ties among players in Fatum, chess, organizations, including with the bodies of coins, breastplates, leather xiangqi, weizi, checkers of state power and cases, souvenir products by the diplomatic corps 8 16

Identification of the Psychotype and Formation of Ecosystem

Annual direction of the best intellectual elite in Turkey employees of organizations that play players in Russia and other countries for intellectual games of participation in the International Championship of BRICS countries (national teams), opening of regional branches in

Opening of game clubs and centers as well as in the team and Turkey

intellectual sports in individual International sports schools, tournaments 18

Development of loyalty programs for

general education schools, members of departments of orphanages, boarding schools, universities Online and TV broadcast matches

International Championships and including when 10% of the winning value

National and International Prize Winners

Children 's and Adults ' World Championships

tournaments and championships come in regional, national and intellectual games with video

The educational center, which prepared and

International tournaments on rollers about partner companies in recommending an athlete to participate in intellectual games of technical pauses and breaks of the event

CURRENT ACTIVITIES

MISSIONS

Training of staff Training of trainers-

the required number of representative offices and instructors of game sets and educational centers of intellectual attributes of intellectual sports games

Establishment in one of the schools Signing of the Agreement with the Grant

the Ministry of National Franchise

intellectual sports, education of Turkey on equipping it with regional equipment of Educational centers, sports chess Educational (chess, Fatum, checkers, schools, general education schools, centers and clubs in weizi, xiantsi), preparation of boarding schools, orphanages, Turkey teaching staff, universities of Turkey with game sets for conducting a "pilot account of a budget and private project" among students in the financing of the year (more effectively)

EXCLUSIVE OPPORTUNITIES

FOR PARTNER

Administrative resources in

The Ecosystem Ambassador

Many countries of the world, in particular, the intellectual elite in Turkey BRICS countries

Awarding of one of the prize-winners

Honorary Consul in the Territory

International Tournaments and

Turkey (countries can be discussed)

World Championships in the game "Fatum"

Awarding of one of the prize-winners

the International Championship

Ambassador of the game "Fatum"

the Game "Fatum" in the BRICS countries

Turkey

(National teams)

ADDITIONAL

OPTIONS

Promotion of partner interests in

countries depend on the political and economic interests of decision makers

Organization and conduct of international

"Fatum" tournaments for adults and children in friendly countries for the Partner Cup

Preparation and conduct of friendly negotiations

in countries of interest

USE OF LOGO

the Game Boards

Adding the logo(s) of the commercial partner(s) to the game boards implies

Participation as an official partner(s) in this area of the BRICS IFII activities:

IN TURKEY IN RUSSIA

in educational centers, sports in educational centers, sports schools, schools, boarding schools, children's schools, schools, boarding schools, orphanages, universities, tournaments of different levels and houses, regional and national others 6 to 10 logos) tournaments (total from 6 to 10 Logos)

IN RUSSIA, BRICS COUNTRIES IN BRICS COUNTRIES

in the International Championship of BRICS countries in "Intelliad" (chess, Fatum, weizi, (one logo from each Xianxi country, checkers, bridge), the number of participants in BRICS) from 3 to 5 thousand players (one logo from each BRICS country)

IN THE COUNTRY, IN COUNTRIES, NOT

THE CHAIRPERSON 'S

BRICS BRICS

the World Championship 2 the International Championships ( International Championships 2 each BRICS country) logo from each BRICS country)

IN INTERESTING COUNTRIES IN THE COUNTRY OF THE TOURNAMENT

CHAMPIONS

in International tournaments (at the request of the partner) by agreement

Educational center of intellectual sports is designed for 100 people (10 chess game sets, 10)

Fatuma Game Sets, 10 Go / Weizi, 10 Xianqi Game Sets, 10 Checkers Game Sets, 10 Laptops, 10 Magnetic Wall Boards 2 boards for each game), printed educational material, video material) * This project is designed to 2025-2030 years.

** Game boards (chess, fatum, go/weiqi, xiangqi, checkers) with partner logos on each type of board used in the Intellectual Sports Centers.

FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF TEAMS

the International Federation of INTELLECTUAL BRICS Games

Promoting the interests of the partner in friendly

countries and international organizations "turnkey".

Cost depends on the complexity of the task, participants

political and economic impact (as agreed).

LOGO Logo placement on game boards

DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES

INTELLECTUAL GAMES IN TURKEY

It is necessary at the legislative level:

Develop, agree and approve methods for teaching intellectual

games: chess, Fatum, checkers, waiqi, xiangqi;

Develop, agree and approve the passport of the specialty "teacher-coach"

intellectual games" for holding advanced training courses in Turkish universities;

Ensure the allocation of budget line for the equipment of schools, orphanages,

boarding schools, universities in Turkey, intellectual sports centers for 100 people (10 sets for chess, Fatuma, checkers, weizi, xiantsi and 2 magnetic boards for learning each game);

Ensure the allocation of premises in the regions of Turkey and budget line for

equipment of Educational centers of intellectual sports in large and small cities of Turkey;

Conduct an active information campaign to ensure that regular

Training in intellectual and sports games contribute to the intellectual development of the younger generation and are directly related to the formation of new neural connections in both hemispheres of the brain in order to systematically adapt to the constantly changing social environment.

OBJECTIVES AND TASKS

the Intellectual Elite Ecosystem in Turkey

Popularization of intellectual games of the countries Popularization of intellectual games

BRICS: "Fatum" (BRICS), "chess" support of state bodies

(India), "Weiqi" (China), "Xianxi" (China), authorities, scientists, culture and "Brazilian checkers" (Brazil), "checkers" of art of the BRICS countries (South Africa)

Identifying the most intellectually Inclusion in the Ecosystem of Intellectual Property

developed players among children and youth, elite premium players, figures financial support and creation of conditions of science, culture and art, public, for their further personal growth scientific and commercial organizations

Opening of Educational Centers Assistance in brand promotion

intellectual sports in Turkey in domestic and foreign markets

CONSORCYUM OF TURKEY COMPANIES

To strengthen the position of the Russian Federation in the international arena

In order to strengthen the position of the BRICS in 2021, the "International Federation" was created.

In addition to the already well-known platforms "St. Petersburg International Economic Intellectual Games BRICS" as an integration platform within the BRICS for the forum, "Petersburg Dialogue", "Russia - the country of opportunities", "Russia - the unification of interests of state authorities, business community, sports figures", in 2021 "International Federation of Science, Culture, Art, Professional Athletes, Lovers of Intellectual Games BRICS" was created as an alternative within the BRICS next sports games and other representatives.

international organizations: FIDE (International Chess Federation),

FMJD (World Draughts Federation), IWF (International Go Federation) and ISF

The events of the International Federation of Intellectual Games of BRICS will take place and will be

(International Xiangqi Federation).

to take place in BRICS countries and friendly countries.

The International Federation of BRICS Intellectual Games

As you know, the process of increasing the number of BRICS members has already begun (Iran, Egypt,

It will be held in BRICS countries and friendly countries.

Saudi Arabia, UAE, Ethiopia, Turkey, Indonesia). Up to 2030 BRICS countries are expected to join the 80 States.

As you know, the process of increasing the number of BRICS members has already begun (Argentina,

Iran, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey). Until 2030, the BRICS plan to enter the Intellectual Games - this is Big politics. Big politics is big business.

about 60 states.

Intellectual games are big politics. Big politics is big business.

We propose to annually form the budget of the "consortium"

Turkey $5 million, of which:

$2,5 million $2,5 millions are provided to the BRICS IFII for the representation in the organization and holding of Turkey for the functioning of the Staff, international tournaments and championships of the organization and holding tournaments and intellectual games (chess, championships in Turkey, and

Fatum, xiangqi, weizi, checkers) with the participation of business trips of the management

Turkish athletes Representation and athletes at the events of the BRICS IFII

Financial burden distribution for six General Partner – $2 million (40%)

participants of the "consortium" annually (as one Strategic Partner – $1 million. (20%) of options) Official partner – $0,5 million. (10%) Official partner – $0,5 million. (10%) Official partner – $0,5 million. (10%) * The redistribution of profits from the activities of the Mission will be carried out according to the specified shares – $0,5 million. (10%)

ADVANTAGES OF OUR OFFER

Getting an exclusive opportunity to be at the Preparation and conduct of the necessary friendly

the origins of new global projects on meetings and negotiations to popularize intellectual games

Increasing the level of recognition of brands of companies

Identifying the most intellectually developed on the world stage, which will contribute to

players among children and youth, financial increase of capitalization of companies support and create conditions for their further personal growth

3 Formation of new markets for the sale of goods

Integration of Turkish athletes in tournaments and providing services to companies

intellectual games championships held by the BRICS IFII

Conducting together with sports companies

4 tournaments in intellectual games (chess,

Promotion of the interests of companies both in Russia and Fatum, Xianqi, Weizi, checkers) in the necessary countries,

in foreign countries, in accordance with the Strategies for the organization of friendly negotiations and further development of companies, assistance in ensuring the entry of companies into new markets of promising countries

9 13

Granting companies the status of Profit from activities

General/Strategic/Official Mission in Turkey:

partner from Turkey to all Russian and

Activities of Educational Centers

international cultural, educational and intellectual sports and their branches;

Intellectual and Sports Events of the MFI

BRICS

Selling TV channels in Turkey rights to

broadcasting of international tournaments and championships in intellectual games,

Adding the company logo to boards that

held by the BRICS IFII;

will be used in all cultural, educational and intellectual sports

Sale of game sets with symbols

the BRICS FII Representative Office

BRICS FIS, souvenirs,

Turkey, and in the information space

"sponsorship packages" on forums, tournaments and

Turkey

Championships in Turkey;

Conducting "corporate

Personal awarding of one of the prize-winners of intellectual games: training

International tournaments and world championships on intellectual games of employees and their

intellectual and sports games in Turkey for children in various companies, organization and holding of tournaments within companies and between companies with representatives

Formation of loyalty programs "BRICS FII"

Public authorities and diplomatic corps

  • - company"

CONTACTS

International Federation

BRICS Intellectual Games 119019, Mr. Moscow, st. Arbat, d. 6/2 +7 (495) 920-25-00 info@mfiibrics.org

Published files

Cooperation · Full published text

SOCIAL COOPERATION. COOPERATIVE LABOUR EXCHANGE

Source Status: Primary Document

A concept for a system organising cooperative employment, project cooperation and the development of human potential

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/kooperativnaya-birzha-truda-sotsialnaya-kooperatsiya

Open on the site

Version 1.0 • 22 August 2026

1. Summary

The Cooperative Labour Exchange (CBT) is an infrastructure mechanism of the Social Cooperation system that connects people, competencies, tasks, projects, customers, cooperatives and resources into a single digital contour of labor organization.

CBT is not just for job search. Its task is to translate the demand for socially useful and economically demanded activities into specific tasks, to form teams for them, to ensure the legal registration of relations, accounting for contributions, payment, the development of competencies and the accumulation of a confirmed reputation.

The key principle of the system: a person gets access not only to the vacancy, but also to the trajectory of participation - from a separate task and project role to membership in a cooperative, creating his own production team and participating in the distribution of the result within the framework of the chosen legal model.

2. Mission and target model

The mission of the CBT is to make work, competence and cooperation an accessible resource for the development of man, territory, enterprise and society.

  • Reduce the gap between the availability of people and the availability of real tasks;
  • create a transparent mechanism for the inclusion of citizens in projects and production chains;
  • provide opportunities for collective entrepreneurship and cooperative employment;
  • Link training and competency confirmation to a specific demand;
  • increase the mobility of labor resources without loss of social protection;
  • to form a reliable digital history of contribution, result and business reputation.

3. Basic principles

PrincipleContents
VoluntaryThe participant independently chooses projects, teams and an acceptable form of employment.
LegalityThe cooperative model does not replace the employment relationship where an employment contract is actually required.
TransparencyTerms of assignment, cost, acceptance criteria, distribution of roles and payments are fixed before the start of work.
CooperationThe system encourages the pooling of competencies and the co-creation of results.
Measurability of contributionThe confirmed results, quality, timing, role and responsibility of the participant are taken into account.
Human developmentThe exchange not only distributes the work, but also builds an individual trajectory of training and professional growth.
InclusionSpecial routes are provided for young people, the older generation, veterans, people with disabilities, parents with reduced mobility and residents of remote areas.
Technological neutralityAI, distributed ledgers and other technologies are used where they provide verifiable benefits, rather than for the technology itself.

4. Participants in the system

Citizen/specialist: Offers competence, performs assignments, receives payment and accumulates a proven reputation.

Project team: temporary association of participants for a specific result.

Cooperative: organizes sustainable joint activities, services to participants, production or provision of services.

Customer: a state body, municipality, enterprise, NGO, cooperative or citizen that forms demand.

Educational partner: closes the lack of competencies through training, practice and certification.

Infrastructure partner: Provides equipment, premises, logistics, digital services, financing or insurance.

CBT operator: provides digital infrastructure, regulations, security, analytics, resolution of typical disputes and quality control of processes.

5. Architecture of the Cooperative Labour Exchange

5.1. Participant profile

Competences, experience, portfolio, confirmation of qualifications, preferred mode of employment, accessibility, geography, history of completed tasks and reliability rating.

5.2. Task and project register

Vacancies, project roles, one-time assignments, production orders, social work, research and engineering tasks, internships and volunteer projects.

5.3. Team Builder

Automated selection of the composition for the task, taking into account the competencies, availability, rating, location and compatibility of roles.

5.4. Outline of contracts

Selection and registration of a legally acceptable form: an employment contract, an SPC contract, an agreement with a self-employed person/individual entrepreneur, membership and economic relations of a cooperative, a consortium or other project model.

5.5. Accounting for contribution and result

Fixing stages, acceptance, quality, labor and individual / team contribution according to pre-agreed rules.

5.6. Calculations

Task account, reservation of funds, stage payments, taxes and mandatory payments depending on the legal status of the participant.

5.7. Reputation and trust

The rating is based not on subjective popularity, but on a confirmed performance history, quality, compliance with deadlines and resolved disputes.

5.8. Training and retraining

Recommendations on scarce skills, educational programs, practical tasks and subsequent access to paid projects.

5.9. Analytics

Map of demand for competencies, forecast of personnel shortage, loading of territories, labor cost, efficiency of employment and cooperation programs.

6. End-to-end process

  1. The customer forms the task and the expected measurable result.
  2. The CBT classifies the task, defines the necessary competencies and the recommended legal model.
  3. The system selects individual performers or forms a project team/cooperative outline.
  4. The parties shall agree on the price, timing, roles, acceptance criteria and the procedure for the distribution of remuneration.
  5. Necessary contracts are drawn up and, if necessary, funding is reserved.
  6. The work is done in stages; the result and contribution are recorded in the system.
  7. The customer accepts the result or the envisaged procedure of revision / dispute is launched.
  8. Payments and mandatory calculations are made.
  9. The result falls into the digital portfolio, and the participant is offered the next project or development trajectory.

7. CBT in the system "Social Cooperation"

The Labour Exchange acts as a human resources and production circuit of social cooperation. Through it, social initiative gains people and competences, and the individual gains access to real tasks, projects and collective forms of economic participation.

Initiative → Decomposition of projects and tasks → Selection of competences → Team building → resource support → execution → acceptance of the result → calculations → Reputation and scaling.

  • social and infrastructure projects receive personnel support;
  • enterprises gain access to a distributed pool of competencies;
  • cooperatives receive a flow of orders and the opportunity to form new areas of activity;
  • citizens receive not only a job search, but also entry into entrepreneurial and project cooperation;
  • Management bodies receive actual analysis of labor demand and supply.

8. Economic model

The economy of the CBT should be based on the understandable cost of services and not create a hidden tax on the labor of the participant. The following sources of platform sustainability are possible:

  • a small service commission with a successfully executed order;
  • subscription services for large customers and cooperatives;
  • payment of advanced analytics and personnel forecasting;
  • corporate programs of personnel reserve formation;
  • state and regional employment and retraining programs;
  • service income from training, insurance, settlements and infrastructure with the voluntary choice of a participant.

Important: the distribution of revenue within the cooperative and the project team is determined by their legal form, internal documents, contract and actual contribution. It is impossible to automatically consider any performer as the "co-owner" of the result or to replace the wages of "shares" without a legal basis.

9. Legal model and compliance

A separate legal outline is required to launch the CBT. The specific design depends on the jurisdiction and composition of the participants; for the Russian Federation, legal expertise of applicable labor, civil, cooperative, tax legislation, legislation on personal data, electronic signature, payments and procurement will be required.

  • differentiation of labor relations and civil enforcement;
  • rules for working with self-employed and individual entrepreneurs;
  • Rules of membership, mutual relations and distribution of cooperative payments;
  • identification of participants and protection of personal data;
  • tax accounting and formation of necessary documents;
  • electronic document management and legally significant fixing of consents;
  • mechanism of claims, arbitration/mediation and appeal of the rating;
  • non-discriminatory algorithmic selection and explanation of key automated solutions.

10. The social effect

ContourEffectExample of indicator
EmploymentFaster transfers a person from search to paid actiondays before the first task; percentage of active participants
IncomeExpands the number of available sources of legal incomeaverage income of the participant; repeated orders
CompetencesLinking training to real demandPercentage of students enrolled in projects
TerritoriesAllows you to assemble local teams for municipal and infrastructure tasksNumber of projects and jobs by territory
CooperationCreates new sustainable teams and businessesNumber of established/active cooperative teams
TrustGenerates a confirmed result historyshare of tasks without disputes; index of re-cooperation

11. Priority application scenarios

  • construction, operation and improvement of territories;
  • Housing, energy, environmental monitoring and rehabilitation;
  • social services, care and support of citizens;
  • SME production cooperation and supply chain localization;
  • engineering, scientific and technological projects;
  • digitalization, data processing, design, media and service work;
  • seasonal employment, agriculture and logistics;
  • youth project teams, internships and first employment;
  • Professional return programs for veterans and other groups who require an adaptive employment trajectory.

12. Role of Artificial Intelligence

The AI in the CBT is used as a navigation and efficiency tool, but not as an opaque arbiter of the participant's fate.

  • semantic comparison of tasks and competencies;
  • identification of skills shortages and building a training program;
  • recruitment of project teams;
  • assessment of the risks of timing and loading;
  • assistance to the customer in decomposition of the result for tasks;
  • labour market analysis and demand forecast;
  • Identification of anomalies and potential fraud in the mandatory human review of controversial decisions.

13. MVP and Roadmap

StageTimeframeContentsResult
0. Design0–2 monthslegal model, regulations, economics, UX, data requirementsApproved Pilot Model
1. MVP3–5 monthsprofile, task catalog, selection, teams, contractual templates, acceptance, ratingworking pilot service
2. Pilot6–9 months1–2 territories or industries, real customers, operator trainingProven processes and indicators
3. Integrations9–12 monthsEDI, payment services, education, accounting and state systems, if there are groundsend-to-end digital process
4. Scaling12+ monthsreplication by industries and territories, industry standardsNetwork Cooperative Infrastructure for Work

14. System of indicators

  • Number of registered and active participants;
  • number of customers, tasks and completed projects;
  • time from the publication of the task to the formation of the team;
  • Percentage of successful results;
  • the amount of payments to participants and cooperatives;
  • the proportion of repeat orders;
  • the proportion of participants who have improved their qualifications and income;
  • the number of formed sustainable cooperative teams;
  • the share of disputes and the average period of their resolution;
  • The economic and social impact of pilot programs.

15. System Management

  • Strategic Council - goals, standards, ecosystem development;
  • Platform operator - technology, data, service and security;
  • Legal and compliance contours - permissible contract models and risk control;
  • Expert industry councils - qualification requirements and results criteria;
  • Regional/industry coordinators - building orders and communities;
  • Trust and Disputes Commission - independent review of conflicts and appeals of the rating.

16. Key risks and management measures

RiskMeasure
Substitution of labour relationsautomatic compliance check and mandatory legal model for relevant scenarios
Distrust of the ratingtransparent criteria, evidence, right to appeal
Poor quality of tasksstandardized brief and acceptance criteria prior to publication
Non-paymentsProvision of funds or other enforcement mechanisms
Algorithmic discriminationmodel audit, minimization of sensitive data, human revision
Fragmentation of cooperativesCommon standards of data, competences and contractual interaction
Weak platform economypiloting monetization and limiting fixed costs until demand is confirmed

17. Strategic positioning

The CBT should be positioned as the next generation infrastructure for employment and production cooperation: not a competitor to human resources sites, but a layer that connects demand, competencies, contracts, execution, training, settlements and cooperative entrepreneurship in one process.

The CBT formula: “from the ability of a person to a proven competence; from competence to team; from team to result; from result to income, reputation and a new level of participation.”

18. Conclusion

Cooperative Labour Exchange can become the basic infrastructure element of the system "Social Cooperation", if it is built not as an ideological superstructure, but as a practically working mechanism: real orders, legally correct relations, transparent calculations, measurable results and understandable benefits for each participant.

With this approach, the CBT connects social policy, the labor market, entrepreneurship, education and industrial cooperation. The main product of the system is not a vacancy, but an organized opportunity for a person to participate in the creation of a demanded result and consistently increase his economic independence.

Other published edition: COOPERATIVE LABOUR EXCHANGE COOPERATIVE_EXCHANGE_Labour_Social_cooperation.pptx · Web Text +

KBT

HUMANITY

COOPERATION

COMPETENCES

Cooperative employment, project cooperation and human development infrastructure

REPUTATION

PROJECT

Version 1.0 • 22 August 2026

Income

Not a job market — participation infrastructure

CBT translates the demand for results into an organized cooperation of people, competencies, resources and contractual relationships.

Issue addressed

Decision

Result

The labor market often connects a person only with a vacancy. Project work, retraining, cooperation and proven contributions remain fragmented.

CBT combines task search, team building, legal clearance, calculations, training and reputation in one digital process.

The main product of the system is not a vacancy, but an organized opportunity for a person to participate in creating a demanded result.

ability → Confirmed competence → team → Result → income → Reputation → New level of participation

Formula CBT

Mission and target model

Make work, competences and cooperation an accessible resource for the development of a person, a territory, an enterprise and a society.

Demand ↔ people

Commands

Training

Closing the gap between the availability of tasks and the availability of competencies.

Formation of project and sustainable cooperative teams.

Retraining and qualification are linked to real demand.

Security

Reputation

Independence

Selecting a legal model of employment without substituting labor relations.

Confirmed history of results, quality and reliability.

Transition from a separate task to sustainable economic participation.

Participants in the system

The CBT links demand, execution, competence development and infrastructure in a single operating model.

Citizen / Specialist

Project team

Cooperative

Competencies, tasks, income, reputation

Temporary association under measurable result

Sustainable joint activities and services for participants

Customer

Educational partner

Infrastructure partner

State, business, NPO, cooperative, citizen

Training, practice, certification

Equipment, logistics, finance, insurance

CBT Operator

Platform, regulations, security, analytics

Digital Platform Architecture

Nine functional modules form a cross-cutting cycle from the participant profile to labor market analytics.

Participant profile

Task and project register

Team Builder

Outline of contracts

Accounting for contribution and result

Calculations

Reputation and trust

Training and retraining

Analysis

End-to-end process

From goal setting to payout, reputation and the next development trajectory.

Task

Classification

Team selection

Negotiation of conditions

Contracts and reserves

Implementation

Reception

Calculations

Reputation / next project

Each stage is recorded digitally: who participated, on what conditions, what result is accepted and what contribution is confirmed.

CBT in the system "Social Cooperation"

A human resources framework that transforms initiatives into teams, execution, and scalable results.

Initiative

Projects and tasks

Competences

Team

Resources

Implementation

Reception

Calculations

Scaling

For citizens

For cooperatives and business

For management

Access to tasks, projects, collective entrepreneurship and growth paths.

The flow of orders, a distributed pool of competencies, the formation of new areas of activity.

Actual analysis of labor demand and supply, personnel shortages and program results.

Legal model: the form of relations is chosen by fact

The CBT does not substitute for labor relations and does not turn any performer into a “co-owner of the result”.

When there are signs of an employment relationship and the inclusion of an employer in the organization.

Contract of employment

To independently perform a specific result.

GPH

For an acceptable business model, taking into account tax restrictions.

Self-employed / IP

Membership, mutual and economic relations on the legislation and internal documents.

Cooperative

For complex inter-organizational projects with roles and responsibilities.

Project Consortium

Mandatory legal expertise of the launch jurisdiction

The economic model of the platform

The sustainability of the CBT is based on the understandable cost of service, and not on a hidden “tax on labor”.

Service Commission

Subscriber services

Analysis

with successfully executed order

for large customers and cooperatives

personnel forecasting and demand maps

Staffing programmes

Employment programs

Partner Services

Formation of reserves and project teams

State and regional

training, insurance, calculations - voluntarily

Principle: The rules for the distribution of revenue within a team or cooperative are determined by the contract, legal form and actual contribution.

AI-Contour CBT

AI helps navigation and efficiency, but does not become an opaque arbiter of the fate of the participant.

Matching

Lack of skills

Commands

Comparison of tasks and competencies

Training recommendations

Completing project roles

Risks

Decomposition

Analysis

Time and load forecast

Assistance to the customer in setting tasks

Forecast of labor market demand

Antifraud

Identification of anomalies with human revision

Priority application scenarios

It is advisable to start the launch where there is a measurable result, personnel shortage and the ability to form project teams.

Construction and improvement

Housing, energy, ecology

Social services

Production cooperation of SMEs

Engineering and scientific projects

Digitalization, data, design

Agriculture and logistics

Youth, internships, first employment

Professional return and adaptive employment

MVP and Roadmap

The pilot must prove not the scale of the interface, but the viability of the full cycle: order → team → contract → result → calculation.

0–2 months

3–5 months

6–9 months

10–15 months

16–24 months

Design

MVP

Pilot

Extension

Scaling

Legal model, roles, processes, design MVP

Profiles, Tasks, Teams, Contractual Outline, Acceptance

1–2 industries / territories, real customers and payments

Training, ratings, analytics, partner services

Regional and sectoral contours, API and integrations

Criteria for transition between stages: confirmed orders, legally correct transactions, accepted results and repeated demand.

System of indicators

The CBT should not be measured by the number of registrations, but by the actual economic and social result.

Active participants

Customers and projects

Team formation time

Percentage of results achieved

Amount of payments

Repeated orders

Increase in skills and income

Sustainable teams

Disputes and term of permission

System Management

Separation of strategy, operational management, legal control and independent dispute resolution.

Strategic Council

Platform Operator

Goals, standards, ecosystem development

Technology, data, service, security

Legal and compliance-contour

Industry advice

Acceptable Contract Models and Risk Control

Qualifications and results criteria

Regional coordinators

Trust and Dispute Commission

Orders, communities, pilot development

Conflicts and Rating Appeals

New infrastructure of participation

COOPERATIVE LABOUR EXCHANGE

Not just finding a job.

To organize the ability of a person to create a demanded result - in a team, in a legal form, with a transparent income and a confirmed reputation.

PERSON → COMPETENCE → TEAM → RESULT → INCOME → REPUTATION

SOCIAL COOPERATION

Published files

Cooperative · Full published text

SPECZASHCHITA Cooperative

Source Status: Primary Document

Cooperative Organisation of Implementation

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/belaya-kniga-speczashchita

Open on the site

EQUILIBRIUM - SFERA - ECO - PPA - SPECZASHCHITA

Strategic document • Version 1.0 • 18 August 2026

Cooperatives turn initiatives into action

SPECZASHCHITA combines competences, resources and responsibilities in one project outline.

Consortiums and production cooperation

Complex expertise

Pilots in the Territory

Verification of the result

Scaling solutions

Five gaps block systemic development

Coordination

Trust

Financing

Implementation

Evidence

The participants act in isolation.

There is no single register of obligations.

Projects are not ready for capital requirements.

The pilot has no connection with the customer.

The effect is not confirmed by data.

Mission sets practical criteria for solutions

MISSION

VISION

PURPOSE

Protection of life and future

Trusted Execution Circuit

Reproducible model

Fair and pragmatic cooperation to protect territory, labor, technology and future generations.

Each resource gets a role, the obligation is fixed, the result is confirmed.

From project portfolio and territorial pilots to scaling proven solutions.

Nine principles keep the system in balance

Legitimacy, evidence and responsibility are more important than the scale of statements.

Common Sense and Justice

Voluntary participation

Authority = liability

Transparency and traceability

Human-centeredness and nature

The four elements form a single architecture

SFERA

EQUILIBRIUM

ECO‑PPA

SPECZASHCHITA

Gathers initiatives, participants, knowledge and opportunities.

Gives analytics, forecasting, monitoring and evidence.

Establishes a policy, financial and contractual framework.

Organizes consortia, production, pilots and scaling.

Single project life cycle

Registration

Qualification

Expertise

Structure

Pilot

Verification

Scale

A single chain of responsibility - from design to reproducible result

Each group receives a clear value

People and territory

Enterprises

Science

State

Financial partners

Employment, training, infrastructure, environmental and social programs.

Consortiums, supply chains, prepared demand and pilot sites.

Applications, testing, partners and industrial implementation.

Single window of initiatives, monitoring and standard scaling models.

Standardized package, phasing and risk management.

19 sections close the full contour of execution

Strategy

Digital framework

Project Office

Research

Right

Standardization

Finance

Security

Energy

Logistics

Eco-modules

Workforce

Water and soil

Social Programs

Biotic communities

International contour

Materials

Communications

Construction

Management combines strategy, expertise and control

General Meeting and Council

Executive Directorate

Project and scientific contours

Audit and public examination

Strategic priorities, programs, portfolio and key partnerships.

Operational management, coordination, contracts and reporting.

Tolerance, prioritization, technological readiness and quality of evidence.

Financial control, compliance, territorial interests and feedback.

The economy is built on separate accounting

Resources are combined only in a legally permissible and transparent design.

Mutual and earmarked contributions

Revenue, grants and support measures

Project and bank financing

PPPs and investment agreements

Equipment, technology and labour

EQUILIBRIUM creates digital evidence

Registries

Monitoring

Evidence

Reporting

Participants, competences, projects, contracts and obligations.

Budgets, Resources, Control Points and History of Change.

Technology passports, tests and primary data archive.

Environmental, social and economic indicators.

The result is measured in six planes

Production

Ecology

Society

Economy

Implementation

Scale

Capacity, infrastructure, products.

Emissions, waste, resources, recovery.

Employment, accessibility, training, safety.

Cost, revenue, payback.

Terms, budget, quality, obligations.

Re-implementation, cost and launch time.

Risks are built into the model before launch

Law and Finance

Technologies and operations

Reputation and Interests

Data and impact

Examination, limits, phasing, reserves and audit.

Tests, readiness criteria, control points.

Checking partners, disclosing interest.

Information protection, environmental and social impact assessment.

The pilot confirms the model on the territory

Work bundle: Syzran - Rameno - Smolkino.

Territory passport and base line

3–5 priority projects

Responsible organizations

Resource scheme and plan for 12 months

Criteria for success and scaling

Roadmap leads to scaling in 36 months

6–18

18–36

Institutional Assembly

Portfolio preparation

Pilots

Scaling

Audit, 19 sites, management bodies, a single project passport.

Expertise, pilot territories, consortia and baseline indicators.

Ecomodules, mini-generation, digital monitoring and verification.

Interregional portfolio, development institutions and international cooperation.

Separated from verification issues

DEFINITELY

CONFIRM

Implementation architecture

Law, Assets and Economics

19 sites; communication with EQUILIBRIUM, SFERA and ECO-PPA; priority of eco-modules and mini-generation; way from initiative to scale.

Charter and powers; rights to technologies and sites; CAPEX/OPEX; valuation of assets; consent of territories; verification methodology.

Approve the contour - start the first pilot

NEXT STEP

SPEC

PROTECTION

The solution needed now

1. Corporate architecture and 19 sites

2. The first project portfolio

3. Passports of pilot territories

4. Financial and contractual model

Cooperation for equitable, safe and sustainable development

Published files

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Territories, infrastructure and project systems

Knowledge-section resources about territorial development, infrastructure and project organisation. The package supplements the regional library with separate texts and concepts from the knowledge journal.

Materials: 8 · with full text: 8 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Territories · Full published text

Cities of Knowledge

Source Status: Primary Document

A project module about an environment where schools, universities, libraries, museums, businesses, communities and governing bodies jointly create, verify and return knowledge to residents.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/goroda-znaniya

Open on the site

Conceptual visualization; not an image of an existing city

Project edition 1.0 • 30 August 2026

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M01 • BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01

Project Synthesis; not ISO or UNESCO

01 / Executive thesis and passport issue

This is not a new closed quarter and not a technological showcase. This is an agreement on how existing schools, universities, libraries, museums, businesses, community organizations, farms, clinics, digital platforms, and governments together create, test, and return knowledge to residents.

FieldValue
DocumentBKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M01
PackageBKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01
StatusCandidate - for discussion, piloting and independent verification
Basic RegistryBKS-0001…BKS-0344; base_count = 344; without new basic records
ConnectionsBKS-0233…BKS-0235: "Parks of Russia and the World / Cities of Knowledge / Superclass"; F11, Second F06

02 / Operational definition and official framework

Operationally, the City of Knowledge exists only when four abilities work at the same time: access to learning, mutual exchange of knowledge, turning knowledge into a verifiable practice, and keeping a memory of what worked or didn’t work. A separate campus, portal or set of sensors without this cycle is only infrastructure.

Reference frameWhat we take to the projectWhat we do not affirm
UNESCO Learning CitiesLifelong learning, sector participation, resource mobilization, monitoring progressThat city automatically enters GNLC
UN-Habitat, 2025Rights, Accessibility, Sustainability, Participation and Human-Centered Digital TransformationNon-binding recommendations are the law.
ITU / U4SSCStructured KPI set and voluntary verificationThat any KPI by itself proves public value
ISO 37100 familyTerms, control systems, methods and sets of indicatorsThe standards set universal targets.

Official points of reference: UNESCO UIL; UN-Habitat International Guidelines on People-Centred Smart Cities (2025); ITU/U4SSC; ISO/TC 268. Full references to c. 25.

  • The object of management is not the “smartness” of the city, but the ability of residents to learn and influence decisions.
  • The result unit is a verifiable improvement in access, quality of life, sustainability, or trust while respecting rights.
  • Indicators are selected according to the local context; initial values and uncertainty are published before the pilot.

03 / The man in the center: rights before technology

Five Guarantees

  • Dignity and agency: understandable consent, the right to refuse and an alternative non-digital channel.
  • Equal access: universal design, language and age accessibility, support for people with disabilities.
  • Privacy: Minimization of data, limitation of purpose, retention periods and prohibition of hidden resale.
  • Controversy: explanation, log of decision, independent complaint and timely correction.
  • Human stop: An authorized operator can safely stop an experiment or service.

Public Value Check

Before launch, the team answers three questions: who benefits, who carries the risk, and who can say “stop”. Responses are checked with the groups that are most affected by the decision. The final score does not average minority rights within a high urban score.

Normative orientations: Universal Declaration of Human Rights; Recommendation UNESCO on the ethics of artificial intelligence (2021); UN-Habitat (2025).

04 / Full cycle of knowledge circulation

The cycle is not a conveyor where the solution is known in advance. At each transition, a return is allowed: data can change the question, independent verification can reject the method, and residents can change the criterion of success. This transforms urban politics from a series of one-off projects into a learning system.

Control transitions

  1. Formulate the public issue so that it is not replaced by the purchase of a specific technology.
  2. Record the baseline, data sources, constraints, and participant protection plan.
  3. Conduct a limited reversible pilot with predetermined criteria PASS / REWORK / STOP.
  4. Measure direct, distributive, and unforeseen effects, not just activity volume.
  5. Write the decision, data, uncertainty, and lessons in the shared archive, including negative results.

05 / Eight functional contours

Contours are not industry “wells”, but interrelated functions. Everyone has an owner of a social outcome, partners, a set of evidence, and a route for intergenerational knowledge transfer.

ContourFunctionExample of verifiable result
1. EducationContinuous learning trajectoryReducing barriers to entry and completion of programs
2. ScienceResearch into urban challengesA reproducible protocol and an open report
3. Culture / ArchiveMemory and navigation by meaningAn accessible catalogue showing the origins of resources
4. Production / EntrepreneurshipResponsible use of knowledgeSafe pilot with measured resource effect
5. Health / social spherePrevention and supportImproving accessibility without discrimination
6. Civil administrationJoint definition of tasksPublic response to suggestions and complaints
7. Digital / Data InfrastructureCompatibility and EvidenceTraceable data and portability
8. Biosphere / Food / WaterEnvironmental sustainabilityMeasured balance of water, soil, biodiversity

06 / Spatial model: constellation, not enclave

The City of Knowledge is not built around one prestigious center. The coordinating core links existing institutions and makes them available in the daily geography of the inhabitants.

ScaleCompositionAccessibility criteria
Micro: 15–30 minutesSchool, library, club, clinic, farm, workshop, mobile laboratoryA person can enter without special status
City / agglomerationUniversities, museums, laboratories, enterprises, authorities, data platformUnified routes, data standards and mutual recognition of results
Intercity NetworkPartner cities, research and archival nodesPortability of techniques, not copying context

Six Elements of Constellation

  • a coordinating nucleus with a public mandate and limited term of office;
  • support institutions that maintain their own autonomy;
  • living labs for reversible experiments in a real environment;
  • mobile access for remote areas and people with limited mobility;
  • Civil digital layer with open interfaces and data origin log;
  • intercity network of exchange of protocols, negative results and specialists.

07 / Nodes of knowledge and continuous educational trajectory

A knowledge node is a physical, mobile or digital place where a person can access, contribute experience, verify an assertion, or apply knowledge under responsible supervision.

Node TypeSign inWithdrawal
TrainingRequest and basic diagnosticsMicrocourse, mentor, proven competence
ResearchQuestion and protocolData, Uncertainty, Reproduced Report
PracticalThe task of the company or communityReversible prototype and effects evaluation
ArchivalMaterial and originDescription, access rights, long-term storage
BiosphereMonitoring of the environmentLabel, time series, model and warning
CivilianProposal, complaint, local experiencePublic response and traceable solution

Lifelong learning

The route is built not on age "corridors", but on the task and previous experience: early development → school → professional trajectory → higher education and research → retraining → public mentoring. Informal and local knowledge can be recognized after a transparent assessment, but does not replace qualifications where security requires a license.

08 / From research to application

StageObligatory artifactGateway
ProductionMeasurand, affected groups, rights and baselineG0–G2
MethodProtocol, data quality plan, uncertaintyG3–G4
PilotReversible Experiment and Journal of DeviationsE2 / G5
VerificationIndependent analysis, repeat or external verificationE3 / G6
DecisionHuman justification PASS / REWORK / STOPG7
MemoryVersion, data, code, rights, conclusions and negative resultG8

The move to purchasing or scaling is allowed only after a utility check in a particular environment. The publication of a scientific article, patent, demonstration video or volume of investment does not replace the evidence of social effect.

  • Security-critical solutions require specialized expertise and regulatory compliance.
  • The commercial partner discloses conflicts of interest and rights to results in advance.
  • The city retains the export of data and the ability to change the supplier without losing the archive.

09 / Heritage Archive and Common Memory

This module considers the archive of the preservation of the heritage of Humanity as a project program: a distributed system for preserving documents, oral histories, languages, methods, biological and technical observations. Its value is determined not by the volume of accumulation, but by the origin, rights, accessibility and ability to test the context.

Minimum record of origin

  • who, when and in what context created or transmitted the material;
  • What rights, consents, cultural restrictions and access periods apply;
  • what transformations, translations, restorations or models have been applied;
  • where the original, verification copies and checksums are located;
  • who has the right to correct the description, revoke access or request a review.
LayerMode
PublicOpen license, machine-readable description, available version
ResearchControlled access, target contract, log of use
GuardedGuardian Council, cultural protocols, prohibition of secondary use

10 / Federated layer of knowledge and data

The federated architecture leaves the data to the responsible holders and connects them with consistent identifiers, dictionaries, interfaces and access rules. A citywide directory describes what exists and under what conditions it is available; it is not required to copy everything into a single repository.

LayerPurposeMinimum protection
Catalog / SemanticsSearch for sets, terms, versions and ownersOrigin and control of the dictionary
Trusted ExchangesTransfer of permitted data between domainsTarget policies, log, encryption
GRID / MetacomputersDistributed large calculationsIsolation of tasks, limits, reproducibility
Analytics / ModelsScenarios, forecasts and decision supportModel card, quality, drift, human review
Public interfaceDashboards, requests, participationAccessibility, aggregation, protection against re-identification

The projects "Computational GRID", "Metacomputers" and "Federal Bases" are included as candidates for the infrastructure layer. Their scale, safety and economic viability must be proven separately; mention does not mean that the technology is ready.

11 / AI, Data and Rights

MonitoringQuestion before launchEvidence
NeedIs it possible to solve a problem without AI or with less data?Analysis of alternatives
Legality / rightsIs there a reason, agreement and an affordable alternative?Processing register and impact assessment
QualityIs the data representative and is the error known?Data card, offset tests, uncertainty
OversightWho is responsible and who can stop it?RACI, decision log, stop procedure
ControversyHow will people find out, explain and correct the result?Notification, appeal, SLA
Life CycleWhat happens during drift, target change or closure?Monitoring, review, deletion and archive

Recommendation UNESCO About Ethics AI It is used as a normative reference point. Applicable law, industry requirements, and local procurement procedures are further tested for specific application. High average KPI cannot compensate for discrimination or violation of basic rights.

12 / Biosphere, water and food security

The city is considered as part of the catchment, soil and food landscape. Contour combines observation, education and practice: school and university laboratories, urban farms, water utilities, natural areas, markets and enterprises operate according to comparable protocols.

ObjectObservationA solution that can be tested
WaterQuality, consumption, leakage, seasonalityReducing losses without worsening availability
SoilOrganic matter, pollution, structureRestoring the site to control points
BiodiversityTypes, habitats, connectivityProtection and recovery with independent monitoring
FoodOrigin, Loss, Accessibility, NutritionSustainable full cycle chain
Energy / MaterialFlows, emissions, wasteReducing impact without postponing damage

The Biocenosis and Full-Cycle Farm project is included as a food security laboratory. Before scaling, sanitation, economics, labor, animal welfare, water, soil, biodiversity, and food availability are tested.

13 / Dynamic model of the biosphere

ComponentContentsQuality control
Status x(t)Water, soil, vegetation, species, climatic and anthropogenic factorsUnits, geography, time step
Effects u(t)Construction, land use, production, rehabilitation measuresScenario and responsible owner
Transition FHypotheses about dynamics and relationshipsCalibration, Sensitivity, External Verification
Observation y(t)Sensors, laboratories, remote and civil surveillanceTraceability, QA/QC, uncertainty
DecisionPlan, Warning, Restriction or StopHuman Reasoning and Journal

The model stores several scenarios and does not fold the biosphere into one index. The alert threshold is defined in conjunction with the relevant specialists and communities, and the warning always contains the source, time, geography and confidence.

14 G / Control0–G8

G0-G8 is a single route of the design solution. Each gateway has an owner, entrance, exit and the right to return the work for revision or stop it.

GatewayThe control questionWithdrawal
G0 MeaningWhat is the public challenge and for whom?Brief justification
G1 RightsWhose rights and risks are affected?Impact assessment and protection
G2 MeasurandWhat exactly are we measuring?Definition, unit, reference level
G3 ProtocolHow do we get a comparable result?Pre-registered method
G4 Data / QA / UIs the data reliable and what is the uncertainty?Quality plan and U-budget
G5 E-gateWhat level of evidence has been achieved?E0 - E4 and restrictions
G6 Independent verificationWho checked outside the team?Check / Replay Report
G7 Human decisionWho takes responsibility?PASS / REWORK / STOP
G8 Archive and supervisionCan it be restored and revised?Version, journal, audit period

15 / Evidence E0–E4 and validation map

LevelCanonical significanceWhat is allowed
E0Symbol / ImageDiscuss meaning; do not claim effect
E1Hypothesis / ModelDesign the test; explicitly name the assumptions
E2Observation / limited pilotAct only within the limits of the pilot
E3Independent verificationCompare and prepare controlled expansion
E4Validated reproducible resultScale in the confirmed scope

E-level describes the power of evidence, not the moral value of an idea. It is assigned a separate statement: one project can have E3 for accessibility and E1 for long-term environmental effect.

Approval Validation Map

  1. The statement and the measured value: what exactly should change and in what units.
  2. Context and boundaries: population, place, period, exceptions and acceptable risk.
  3. Method and data: protocol, origin, quality, uncertainty and version.
  4. Result and alternatives: magnitude of effect, distribution, side effects, competing explanations.
  5. Verification and solution: independent reviewer, E-level, G-gateway, PASS / REWORK / STOP and date of revision.

16 / Passport Cities Knowledge and Indicators

Passport is the updated public profile of the city, not the rating of people and not the certification mark. It combines context, initial meanings, goals, result distribution, and quality of evidence.

Passport BlockExamples of indicatorsCut
AccessTime to node; cost; share of available formats; adult coverageArea, age, income, restrictions
ReciprocityShare of joint design programmes; number of public response contributionsParticipant group and type of response
TransformationPercentage of pilots with measured effect; time from issue to decision; repeatabilityOutline, E-level, effect
MemoryPercentage of decisions with origin; availability of archive; preservation of versions and negative resultsType of record, rights, term
Rights and trustComplaints, time of correction, refusals, leaks, clear notificationsService, risk, total
ResilienceWater, energy, soil, biodiversity, food lossTerritory and Season

U4SSC and ISO 37120/37122/37123 are used as directories and matching methods. Target thresholds are set locally and are not attributed to standards.

17 / Funding and architecture of funds

The financial system must separate long-lived infrastructure from risky experiments and maintain verification independence. Personal and registered funds may support missions, but do not receive the right to covertly change criteria, manage residents’ data or circumvent public oversight.

ContourPurposeSelection condition
Basic infrastructureLibraries, communications, accessibility, archives, general dataPublic mandate and life cycle
Mission portfolioResearch and cross-sectoral programmesG0-G4, Stage financing
Microgrant communitiesLocal issues and civil scienceSimple competition, mentoring, open result
Independent evaluationChecking E-levels, rights and effectsOrganizational and budgetary independence
Reserve and exitSafe stop, portability, recoveryPre-funded exit plan

Financial rules

  • The money follows the evidence: the tranches are tied to G-gates and E-levels, not advertising metrics.
  • Rights to publicly funded data and methods should not create an irrevocable dependence on the supplier.
  • Personal data monetization and forced advertising are excluded from the income model.
  • A negative result under the observed protocol is considered socially useful knowledge, and not a reason to hide the report.

18 / White Book Housing Integration Card

Topics of previous works are included as project modules and hypotheses. The map shows the place in architecture, but does not confirm their scientific, technical, economic or legal readiness.

Case ModuleRole in the City of KnowledgeStarting status
White Paper of DestinyMaster archive of terms, solutions and versionsProject system
The Heritage Archive of HumanityOrigin, conservation and cultural rightsCandidate of the program
Dynamic Model of the BiosphereScenarios of water, soil and ecosystemsE1 to local calibration
Food security / full cycle farmLiving Food Chain LaboratoryE1-E2 by individual pilots
GRID / Metacomputers / Federal databasesComputational and Data LayerCandidate of Architecture
Symbolic systems and languagesCultural navigation and semantic hypothesesE0–E1
Fund System / Financial SystemMission and phased fundingProject model

19 / Pilot 1. The Learning Area

ElementPilot's Design
BorderOne district; 2–3 training nodes and mobile team; 9 months
ParticipantsResidents of different ages, including people with disabilities, migrants and the unemployed
InterventionSingle window, competence navigator, mentors, recognition of previous experience
ComparisonBaseline and comparable area/period where applicable
MetricsAccess time, completion, next step, satisfaction, complaints
Stop-ruleIncreasing exclusion, opaque profiling, or lack of offline alternatives

Proof Package

  • Map of barriers and source data before launch.
  • Protocol of consent and data minimization.
  • Independent verification of the availability and distribution of the effect.
  • Archive of routes, rejections, complaints and corrections.

20 / Pilot 2. Science is responsible production

ElementPilot's Design
BorderOne production chain; up to three enterprises; 12 months
QuestionSpecific measured flow: water, energy, raw materials or waste
MethodOpen measurement protocol, U-budget, hardware and software version
ProtectionLabor protection, trade secrets at a minimum, the rights of employees to participate
MetricsAbsolute and specific effect, cost of ownership, security, transfer of damage
Stop-ruleIrreproducible effect, increased labor risk or closed dependence on the supplier

Exits

  • Reproducible method and public description of the scope.
  • Prepared educational program for engineers, workers and entrepreneurs.
  • Solution PASS / REWORK / STOP with independent signature G6 and human responsibility G7.

21 / Pilot 3. Biosphere and food contour

ElementPilot's Design
TerritorySmall catchment, adjacent green areas and full cycle farm
ObservationSeasonal base cycle; laboratory, remote and civil data
InterventionOne reversible water/soil measure and one food loss measure
ModelScenarios with uncertainty; ban on automatic management decision
MetricsWater quality, soil, habitat, food loss, cost and availability
Stop-ruleHealth risk, degradation of the benchmark or inability to attribute

Openness Package

  • Map of stations and biocenose marks with origin.
  • Public card model, versions and known limitations.
  • Harmonized protocol for alerting and human decision.

22 / Road map for 36 months

Timing is the benchmark for a step-by-step decision, not the promise of a result. Each transition requires a completed G-gate and sufficient E-level; the calendar does not increase the evidence.

PeriodFocusMandatory exit / gate
0–3 monthsMandate, rights, map of nodes, questions and inputsG0-G2; pilot design solution
4–6 monthsProtocols, data, procurement, independent inspectorsG3-G4; ready for safe launch
7–12 monthsThree limited pilots and a general archiveE2; first PASS / REWORK / STOP
13–18 monthsAdjustment, repetition, cross-sector trainingG6; confirmation or stop
19–24 monthsExtension of only confirmed componentsE3 for scalable approval
25–30 monthsInter-district / inter-city portabilityVerifying context and compatibility
31–36 monthsInstitutionalization, rights and portfolio auditG8; decision on permanent model

Rules of transition

  1. Do not start data collection until G1 and G2.
  2. Do not expand the pilot just because the budget year is exhausted.
  3. Do not consider the internal presentation an independent test of G6.
  4. At STOP, fund a safe exit, notification, portability, and lesson archive.

23 / Risks, stop rules and solution package for 90 days

RiskEarly SignalStop / mitigation
TechnocentrismProcurement formulated before the questionReturn to G0-G2
Capture by the eliteAccess and Agenda Focused on a Narrow GroupReassemble Representation and Rules
Monitoring / data extractionTarget extension, hidden profileStop processing; delete/correct by procedure
ExceptionDeterioration of access for vulnerable groupsReturn alternative channel; REWORK
Greenwashing / metric gamingIncreasing reporting with no absolute effectIndependent verification and metric change
Vendor lock-inNo export, documentation or exit planDo not enter into/extend a contract
The Pilot CemeteryNo owner of result and archiveClose or assign G7/G8
Irreversible CAPEXLarge investment up to E2 > E3Break down into reversible stages

Solution package for the first 90 days

  1. Approve the temporary public mandate, council of rights and independent control G6.
  2. Select the territory and make a map of nodes, access barriers and data holders.
  3. Formulate three public issues and original measures without reference to the supplier.
  4. Prepare pilot passports, data protection, exit budget and criteria PASS / REWORK / STOP.
  5. Publish the original passport, four independent vectors and a calendar of open parsing.

24 / Register of official sources and status of the module

  1. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning - Learning Cities. Official page - overview of the concept and network of learning cities
  2. UNESCO - Building a Learning City. Official page — practical framework for construction
  3. UNESCO GNLC Guiding Documents. Official page - key characteristics and indicative framework
  4. UNESCO Lifelong Learning Toolkit - GNLC entry. Official page - lifelong learning tools
  5. UNESCO Learning Cities Progress Report 2022–2024. Official page - self-reports 266 cities; interpret according to the method
  6. UN-Habitat - International Guidelines on People-Centered Smart Cities. Official page - Manual No. 2025; non-binding
  7. UN-Habitat - Guidelines PDF, 4 March 2025. Official page — official text of the manual
  8. ITU — KPIs on Smart Sustainable Cities. Official page — review KPI ITU/U4SSC
  9. U4SSC. KPI | Verification reports — voluntary structure and published reports
  10. ITU-T Recommendation Y.4903/L.1603. Official page — methodical recommendation on KPI
  11. ISO/TC 268. Catalogue | Online Browsing Platform — terms and standards of cities; methods, not universal thresholds
  12. ISO 37100 family — exact pages. 37101 | 37106 | 37120 | 37122 | 37123 | 37124 | 37125 — management, operating models and indicators; check the current edition
  13. UNESCO - Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Official page — accepted 23 November 2021
  14. United Nations - Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Official page - a basic framework of dignity and rights
  15. OECD - Smart Cities and Inclusive Growth. Official page - Inclusive Governance and Growth
  16. OECD - Smart City Data Governance. Official page - City data management
  17. World Bank - Digital and AI. Official page - digital infrastructure, data and AI as a policy area

Other published edition: CITY KNOWLEDGE OF THE CITY_Knowledge.pptx · web text +

The man in the middle. Knowledge is a social outcome.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02

BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01

30 August 2026 · project synthesis · registry 344 not modified

The City of Knowledge is an exchange, not a showcase of technology

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 02

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 02

Value creates urban metabolism knowledge: access → verification → application → feedback

MAJOR THESIS

EXPERIENCE

DATA

KNOWLEDGE

DECISION

RESULT

People and places

Observable

Verification and meaning

Rights and Choices

Learning and Life

Not a “smart city for the sake of technology”, but the ability of society to learn, test and act together.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Definition sets the boundary of the project

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 03

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 03

Five sources of knowledge become available training and verifiable result

The City of Knowledge is a human-centered urban ecosystem that transforms experience, data, science, culture, and local knowledge into accessible learning and verifiable social outcomes throughout life.

IN CONTOUR

Boundaries

Lifelong learning

Science and application

Memory and local knowledge

data, rights, feedback

Biosphere and Public Benefit

Technology Showcase

single rating of a person

Total data collection

Autonomous high-risk solution

Certification without external procedure

The project evaluates the system and the social outcome - not the value, fate or "quality" of a person.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Four official frameworks help verify the project

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 04

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 04

They give language, methods, and guidelines — but they don’t give our model certification status.

UNESCO UIL

the Learning City

Learning in all environments and throughout life

UN-Habitat

human-centric smart city

rights, inclusion, sustainability; recommendations 2025 are optional

ITU / U4SSC

Structure KPI

Comparable indicators and verification procedures

ISO 371xx

Definitions and methods

Urban indicators without universal target thresholds

"City of Knowledge" is our project synthesis. It's not a certificate ISO, UNESCO, ITU/U4SSC the United Nations.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Man is still a subject of the system.

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 05

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 05

Dignity, will and right to challenge are more important than the speed of automation

RIGHTS AS ARCHITECTURAL LIMITATION

DIGNITY

WILL AND CHOICE

HUMANITY

Subject

PRIVACY

EQUIPMENT

AVAILABILITY

Red line: no single point of value, destiny or human right to participate.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Knowledge circulates through feedback

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 06

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 06

Each result returns to learning and changes the next iteration

CYCLE CITY

OBSERVE

DESCRIPTION

CHECK

EXPLAIN

DECIDE

experience and data

Metadata

Method and E-gate

Meaning and Limits

Rights and Choices

LEARN

MEASURE

ACTING

feedback

Result

Pilot

If the result cannot be returned to learning, the system stores information — but does not produce knowledge.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Eight contours connect learning with city life

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 07

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 07

Contours work together: none replaces the others

FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE

EDUCATION

ECONOMICS AND FUNDS

Access and Continuity

Resource and Public Value

RESEARCH

DATA AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Question → Proof

Federation and Trust

MEMORY AND CULTURE

BIOSPHERE AND HEALTH

archive, language, heritage

water, soil, food

CITY MANAGEMENT

COMMUNITIES AND CARE

participation and feedback

Accessibility and Mutual Assistance

Co-ordination of contours is a problem G0-G8; proof of results is a problem E0-E4.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Space begins with a person’s route

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 08

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 08

Each next scale supports the previous one, not takes away its authority.

FOUR MASSTABA

01 STEP AVAILABLE

Library · School · Club · Workshop

02 REGIONAL Knot

HUMANITY

AND HOUSE

Laboratory · archive · public forum

03 URBAN PLATFORM

Standards · resources · common passport

04 FEDERAL REGION

exchange without loss of local control

The principle of subsidiarity: data and decisions remain as close to the person and place as possible.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

The knowledge node connects place, function and proof

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 09

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 09

Six types of nodes give the city a distributed but compatible infrastructure

TIPOLOGY OF THE Knots

SCHOOL

LABORATORY

BIOSTANCE

learn

check

Watch

LIBRARY

ARCHIVE

FORUM

Find

save

decide

Host Address: KCITY:<CITY_UID>:<NODE_TYPE>:<DOMAIN>:<FUNCTION>:<E>@<version> — project namespace, not an international standard.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

The result is measured on three scales

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 10

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 10

Human access, community capacity, and city resilience are not summed up in one point

HUMANITY

access · participation · mastered opportunity

rights and accessibility

COMMUNITY

Joint projects · Trust · mutual assistance

Local Feedback

CITY / REGION

verifiable results · Sustainability · Portability

Systemic ability

The passport keeps the indicators separate: aggregation should not hide inequality or violation of rights.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Training continues throughout life and returns to the city

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 11

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 11

Transitions between ages and roles are more important than disparate educational services

CONTINUOUS MARCHRUT

EARLY

DEVELOPMENT

SCHOOL

PROFESSION

RETRAINING

TEACHING

Family and environment

Basics and Choices

practice and growth

New role

transfer of experience

The route is open in both directions: a person can return, change trajectory and become a co-author of knowledge.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

The study passes the evidential gate

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 12

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 12

Application does not begin with a promise, but with a limited and reversible pilot

RESEARCH → PUBLIC RESULTS

E0/E1

QUESTION

Protocol

OBSERVATION

VERIFICATION

APPLICATION

Border and Risk

measureand and method

Data + QA/U

independent contour

human decision

PASS · REWORK · STOP — Allowable at every stage; scaling is not automatic.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Heritage archive stores not only the file, but also the trust

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 13

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 13

Origin, Rights, Context and Version Make Memory Fit for the Future

ARCHIVE FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN HERITAGE

SOURCE

DATA

Who and where created

Master + Control

PROVENANCE

RIGHTS

chain of origin

Access and Restrictions

CONTACTS

CONTINUITY

Language and Interpretation

copies, migration, version

Access by default is broad, but not unconditional: personal, sacred, and vulnerable materials require ethics and consent.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

The Federated Layer combines search, not possession.

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 14

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 14

The nodes retain responsibility for the data; the common layer only has compatibility rules

FEDERAL BASES

EDUCATION

SCIENCE

GENERAL

CATALOGUE

metadata · request

Policy · Audit

ARCHIVE

BIOSPHERE

Local storage · single metadata · minimisation · consent · access log · permission withdrawal.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

AI helps to see options, but does not assign the right to decide

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 15

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 15

High impact requires explanation, challenge and human decision

AVAILABLE ROLES

PROHIBITED SUPPORT

Search and Navigation

translation and accessibility

Search for anomalies

scenarios and sensitivity

preparation of an explanation

a Single Person Score

hidden sorting access

Force through personalization

Unexplained refusal

Irreversible Automatic Solution

Always: source · version · limits · human review

Right to refuse · rectification · explanation · challenge

Data is not raw material without a master; knowledge is no reason to abolish subjectivity.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Biosphere — co-author of urban knowledge

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 16

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 16

Water, soil, nutrition and biodiversity form a single observed contour

LIVING CITY CYCLE

WATER

Quality · Stock

Access

SOIL

Status

Risk · cycle

BIOGRAPHY

FOOD

· access cycle

Losses

A full-cycle farm is a project pilot: the closing of the flows is checked by the balance of matter, energy and risk.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

xₜ₊₁ = F(xₜ, uₜ; θ) + εₜ

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 17

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 17

Dynamic model builds a testable scenario

The model supports the decision, but does not give a forecast for the inevitable future

OBSERVATION → SCENARIUM → VERIFICATION

Status

Management

parameters

Uncertainty

OBSERVE

ASSESS

SCENARIUM

DECIDE

VERIFIED

The assumptions, ranges, data quality, sensitivity and conditions of model failure are published.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

G0-G8 links rights and evidence

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 18

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 18

Each gate is completed by decision PASS, REWORK or STOP

Intention

TEST

RESPONSIBILITY

MEANING

Protocol

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION

RIGHTS

DATA / QA / U

HUMAN DECISION

MEASURAND

E-GATE

ARCHIVE AND OVERSIGHT

G0-G8 controls the power and process. E0 - E4 describes the strength of the proof separately.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

E0-E4 shows the strength of the proof

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 19

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 19

Levels rise only through surveillance, independence and reproducibility — without a change of management

SYMBOL

EXAMPLE

HYPOTHESIS

MODEL

OBSERVATION /

LIMITED PILOT

INDEPENDENT

VERIFICATION

VALIDIZED

REPRODUCABLE

RESULT

Protocol, power and decision belong to G0-G8. E-level does not give the system the right to act.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

City of Knowledge passport stores KPI without a single rating

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 20

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 20

Each indicator has a base, target, owner, source, frequency and E-level

RIGHTS AND ACCESS

DATA AND DIGITAL TRUST

TRAINING

BIOSPHERE AND SUSTAINABILITY

SCIENCE AND APPLICATION

MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC USE

HERITAGE AND CULTURE

Card KPI: Definition · unit · Territory · baseline · target · Owner · Source · frequency · E · Limitations.

Compatible with official frames, but is not U4SSC / ISO / UNESCO certification.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Funding follows the evidence

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 21

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 21

Each layer of capital has its own risk, horizon, and stopping conditions.

FUND SYSTEM

PUBLIC FRAMEWORK

Right · Library · Basic Data

PROTECTORS

DEVELOPMENT AND GRANTS

Study · training · access

Separate accounting

independent audit

Conflict-policy

Transparent beneficiary

stop-rule

Return of Public Value

PROJECT / NAME FUNDS

Pilots with Conflict Policy

MASTER BY RESULT

After the E-Gate

Funding does not cancel out G-gate and does not raise the E-level.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

The City of Knowledge Connects Project Modules

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 22

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 22

Integration is cross-references and general rules, not duplicate registry

KNOWLEDGE AND MEMORY

RESPONSIBILITY AND MASSAGE

Dynamic Model of the Biosphere

Food Security and an Integrated Farm Covering the Full Production Cycle

GRID, metacomputers and federated bases

System of funds and finance

White Paper of Destiny

Heritage Preservation Archive

Symbolic systems and languages

CITY

KNOWLEDGE

coordination

G0–G8 · E0–E4

Related Records: BKS-0233…BKS-0235 ("Parks of Russia and the World / Cities of Knowledge / Superclass") · Family F11 · secondary F06.

Basic Registry BKS-0001…BKS-0344 not changed; no new base record is created.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Three pilots check different contours

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 23

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 23

Each pilot is limited, reversible, and completed by decision PASS, REWORK or STOP.

REGIONAL LEARNING Knot

BIOSPHERE LABORATORY

FEDERAL ARCHIVE

school · library · forum

water · soil · full cycle farm

heritage · metadata · rights

Proof: Access and completed route

Evidence: Verifiable Balance and Risk

Proof: search without loss of ownership

90 days deliver E1 and readiness for a limited E2 pilot — not a proven city-wide effect.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

36 months: scale opens with evidence

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 24

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 24

Calendar sets the rhythm; E-gate and human decision define transition

CONTOUR

PILOTS

VERIFICATION

MASSHTAB

· rights

passport · owners

baseline · protocol

limited launch

comparison · QA/U

independent contour

Federation · Supervision

Reproducibility

10–18

19–36

G0–G3 / E1

G4–G5 / E2

G6 / E3

G7–G8 / E4*

*E4 is not assigned by date: a validated reproducible result is required. Otherwise, REWORK or STOP.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

APPROVAL

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 25

WHITE PAPER OF DESTINY / 25

Decision: approve 90-day design outline

Not certification or scaling — training of a measurable, right-wing pilot

CONTOUR OF SOLUTIONS

Charter and Rights

Borders · Roles · stop-rules

BASELINE AND PASSPORT

KPI · Sources · E-levels

90 DAYS

THREE PILOT PROTOCOLS

measureand · QA/U · Risk

COLLECTION G0-G8

Mandate · Audit · Challenge

Exit in 90 days: solution PASS / REWORK / STOP to launch limited E2-pilots.

BKS-CAND-GZ-0001-M02 · Package BKS-REVIVAL-SUP-GZ-2026-01 · Basic Registry: 344

Sources cited in presentation 36

  • No external sources; project synthesis.
  • [Presenter notes]
  • Hero asset: OpenAI ImageGen, generated in the current conversation and used only on this slide.
  • The thesis and knowledge-metabolism framing are project synthesis.
  • Operational definition and boundary are project synthesis.
  • https://www.uil.unesco.org/en/learning-cities
  • https://www.uil.unesco.org/en/learning-cities/build-learning-city
  • https://unhabitat.org/international-guidelines-on-people-centred-smart-cities
  • https://u4ssc.itu.int/u4ssc-kpi/
  • https://www.itu.int/itu-t/recommendations/rec.aspx?rec=14173
  • https://www.iso.org/committee/656906/x/catalogue/
  • UN-Habitat's 2025 guidelines are non-binding. ISO 371xx offers definitions and methods, not universal target thresholds.
  • https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
  • https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence
  • The circulation loop is a project operating model.
  • The eight-contour decomposition is project synthesis.
  • The four-scale spatial model is project synthesis.
  • Node types and the KCITY namespace are project-defined.
  • https://lifelonglearning-toolkit.uil.unesco.org/en/node/196
  • The three-scale measurement model is project synthesis.
  • The research-to-application gates are project synthesis.
  • Archive architecture is project synthesis.
  • Federated architecture and namespace are project synthesis.
  • The integrated biosphere/food/water contour is project synthesis.
  • The state-space equation is used as a generic project model form, not as a claim of a calibrated model.
  • Canonical project governance gates: G0 meaning; G1 rights; G2 measurand; G3 protocol; G4 data/QA/U; G5 E-gate; G6 independent verification; G7 human decision; G8 archive and oversight.
  • Canonical project evidence scale: E0 symbol/image; E1 hypothesis/model; E2 observation/limited pilot; E3 independent verification; E4 validated reproducible result.
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/68498.html
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/69050.html
  • https://www.iso.org/standard/70428.html
  • The seven KPI groups and KPI card are project-defined. ISO indicators provide methods, not universal target thresholds.
  • The fund and financing architecture is project synthesis.
  • All named items are internal project modules. Cross-references are authoritative continuity links, not new registry records.
  • The three pilots and their proof statements are project proposals.
  • The 36-month roadmap is a project proposal. E4 is evidence-gated and cannot be assigned by calendar.
  • The 90-day approval request and outputs are project proposals.

Published files

Infrastructure · Full published text

Unified Construction Portal

Source Status: Primary Document

A concept for an integrated digital system for the construction industry and the implementation of Russian Government Order No. 398-р.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/edinyi-stroitelnyi-portal

Open on the site

One object - a single digital passport - a managed life cycle

Purpose: Inter-agency coordination, piloting and federal scaling

Addressees: Government of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Construction of Russia, regions, development institutions and construction industry

Initiator: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

Ecosystem: EQUILIBRIUM — SFERA — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA

Version: 1.0 / 25 August 2026

Moscow • 2026

NAVIGATION

Contents

1. Executive summary

2. Background and objective

3. Target model and principles

4. Users and the life cycle of the object

5. Nineteen functional modules

6. Place of the portal in the state digital architecture

7. Unified data model and digital passport

8. Cross-cutting process and control gate

9. Analytics, artificial intelligence and digital twin

10. Governance, security and legal framework

11. Economic model, KPI and effects

12. MVP, pilot and road map

13. Risks and solutions required to start

Applications: integrations, roles, terms and sources

Status. The document is a draft concept. It does not replace normative legal acts and does not change the powers of the existing state information systems. All legally significant decisions are left to the authorized bodies and persons.

MAIN CONCLUSION

1. Executive summary

Proposal. Create a Unified Construction Portal as a trusted integration and transaction layer around a capital construction object: with a single identifier, digital passport, event history, control gate, measurable result and archive of evidence.

The portal should not duplicate the Unified Information System "Stroykompleks.RF", GISOGD, NSPD, EGRP, FGIS CA, EIJS, EIS in the field of procurement, EGRN, public services and other operating systems. Each of them retains its own powers and status as a source of legally significant information. The portal connects their data and actions into a single life cycle of a particular object.

The goal is to move from fragmented document sharing to result management: timing, cost, quality, safety, resource availability, impact on the territory, and operational readiness become visible before critical deviation occurs.

The architecture is based on the principle of "one data - multiple legitimate use". The user logs in through the ESIA, creates or receives a digital passport of the object, and the information is loaded from trusted sources by API and through an event exchange. Repeated manual input is allowed only as an exception with the indication of the reason.

In the project ecosystem SFERA Gathers needs and participants; ECO-PPA forms a programmatic, resource and contractual framework; SPECZASHCHITA organizes cooperation and implementation; EQUILIBRIUM performs monitoring, forecasting and verification of the result; IAC provides decision support and work with deviations. A single construction portal becomes an industry point of assembly of these functions and state services.

  1. Approve the concept of the portal and the interdepartmental working group.
  2. In 30 days, conduct an inventory of processes, registers and integrations without creating parallel databases.
  3. For 90 days start MVP on three types of objects: housing, social infrastructure, industrial and infrastructure object.
  4. Adopt a single standard for the digital passport of the object and the event log.
  5. Secure pilot KPI, independent verification and scaling order.

2. Background and objective

2.1. Fragmentation does not occur due to the lack of systems

The construction already has a developed set of federal, regional, departmental and corporate information systems. The problem arises at the junctions: the same object has different identifiers, versions of documents, compositions of participants, cost models and statuses in different contours.

  • The life cycle gap. Land solution, design, expertise, procurement, construction, commissioning and operation are carried out as a sequence of individual cases, and not as a single object of management.
  • Liability gap. The transfer of documents between participants does not always mean the transfer of measurable responsibility for the result.
  • Data breach. Information is re-entered, diverged by version and do not always have a confirmed source and a temporary label.
  • Later detection of risk. Deviation becomes apparent after the loss of time or money, rather than at the stage of scenario analysis.
  • Weak feedback. Operational defects and actual performance rarely return to the design, rationing and selection of contractors.

The criterion of success. The portal should reduce the number of gaps between participants and systems, and not increase the number of cabinets, forms and reports.

2.2. The state framework is already forming a digital vertical

The key elements of the digital vertical of the construction industry already exist: EIS "Stroykompleks.RF" and registers of requirements and documents, regional GISOGD, project management information systems, GIS TOR KND, EGRZ, FGIS CA, EISJS, NSPD and electronic public services. V 2026 the Government of the Russian Federation approved the updated strategic direction of digital transformation of construction and housing 2030 years.

Therefore, the architectural solution should be federal: retain the powers of data owners, use open integration contracts, provide end-to-end identification of the object and give a single user path on top of existing sources.

3. Target model and principles

3.1. What is a portal

A single construction portal is a state digital ecosystem that combines services, data, participants, contracts, resources, control and analytics around the full life cycle of a capital construction facility.

3.2. Ten Principles

Formula. Unique object identifier + digital passport + Reliable sources + Event Log + Check gate + Explainable Analytics + archive of evidence.

  1. The object, not the departmental form, is the central unit of management.
  2. Existing state systems remain sources of legally significant information.
  3. Data is entered once and reused within the legal regime.
  4. Each version, decision, event, and source is stored in the audited history.
  5. A person makes a legally and socially significant decision; the algorithm explains the factors and consequences.
  6. Access is provided by role, purpose, authority, and minimum amount of data required.
  7. Interfaces are built around the life situations of a citizen, business, customer and authority.
  8. Regional variability is maintained without destroying the federal core of data and standards.
  9. Open API, single classifiers and data exports prevent dependence on a single supplier.
  10. The result is measured by the fact of input, quality and operation, and not by the number of downloaded documents.

3.3. What the portal does not do

  • does not create a parallel vertical of public administration;
  • does not cancel existing procedures, powers and registers without a separate regulatory decision;
  • does not replace an expert, inspector, customer, designer or registration authority;
  • does not store redundant copies of data if a reliable primary source is available;
  • It does not allow for an opaque automatic refusal, rating or sanction.

4. Users and the life cycle of the object

4.1. Custom Outlines

UserThe main way in the portal
Citizen / CommunityThe need for territory, public discussion, access to open statuses and results
Investor / DeveloperInitiative, land scenario, permits, financing, sales and input
CustomerPlanning, budget, procurement, contract, acceptance and change management
Designer / ExpertRequirements, TIM, versions of project documentation, comments and conclusions
Contractor / SupplierQualification, capacity, schedule, materials, logistics, acts and quality
Authority/SupervisionServices, coordination, control, risk indicators, interagency interaction
Operating organizationDigital passport, regulations, maintenance, repairs, accident and feedback
Financial / insurance partnerRisks, tranches, guarantees, insurance events and confirmation of the result

4.2. Ten stages of the end-to-end life cycle

  1. Need and initiative: substantiation of social, infrastructure or investment needs.
  2. Territory and land: spatial constraints, rights, urban planning potential and engineering support.
  3. Investment model: scenarios of cost, financing, income, risk and societal impact.
  4. Design: task, research, TIM, requirements, versions and coordination of solutions.
  5. Examination and permissions: conclusions, comments, authorization actions and completeness control.
  6. Procurement and contracting: selection of performers, contract model, schedule, security and liability.
  7. Construction and supply: works, resources, logistics, executive documentation and changes.
  8. Control and commissioning: construction supervision, acceptance, registration of rights and commissioning.
  9. Operation and repair: maintenance, repairs, resource consumption and safety.
  10. Renovation or withdrawal: reconstruction, dismantling, reuse of materials and restoration of the territory.

5. Nineteen functional modules

Modules are combined with a single passport of the object and can be implemented in stages. MVP runs the minimum set, and the rest are connected through coordinated interfaces and single classifiers.

№ModuleKey ServicePrimary ligament
1Initiatives and needsCollection, prioritization and socio-territorial justificationSFERA
2Land and territorySpatial data, restrictions, zones, rights, sitesNSPD / GISOGD / EGRN
3Digital object passportUnified ID, target, parameters, statuses, versions, communications and proofsPortal Core
4Participants and competenciesProfiles of organizations, tolerances, capacities, experience, responsibilityPortal / external registers
5Requirements and standardsApplicable rules, specifications, requirements registerConstruction complex.RF / EUT
6Research, design and TIMTasks, models, collisions, versions, common data environmentProject IP / ISUP
7ExpertiseSubmission, comments, conclusions, model decisions and historyEGRZ / ECPE
8Permits and servicesLife situations, statements, interagency exchange, resultPublic services / GISOGD
9Cost and resourcesEstimates, indices, prices, standards, need for materialsFGIS CS
10Financing and ECO-PPAFinancial model, tranches, guarantees, insurance, risk distributionECO-PPA

5.1. Modules 11–19: execution, operation and forecast

№ModuleKey ServicePrimary ligament
11Procurement and contractsPlanning, procedures, contracts, obligations, changesEIS Procurement / EDO
12Cooperation and capacitiesConsortiums, production loading, labour and subcontractingSPECZASHCHITA
13Materials and logisticsOrigin, certificates, shipments, routes, warehouses and deliveriesSuppliers / transport IP
14Construction managementCalendar, actual progress, executive documentationISUP / IS Contractor
15Control, quality and safetyRisk-oriented supervision, defects, labor protection, eliminationGIS TOR KND / supervision
16Input and registrationReadiness, permission to enter, technical plan, rightsPublic services / Rosreestr
17Operation and repairsRegulations, applications, service, status and consumptionGIS Housing and Utilities / Operational
18Impact and verificationEnvironmental and social indicators, ESG-IR 1.0, archive of evidenceECO-PPA / independent bodies
19Analytics and ForecastingDigital twin, scenarios, early warning, result controlEQUILIBRIUM / IAC

6. Place of the portal in the state digital architecture

6.1. The Federation of Systems

The portal provides user and process integrity, but does not assign data, authority and legal status to the systems involved. For each field of the digital passport, the source, owner, basis of access, time of receipt, version and acceptable method of use are fixed.

System / OutlineWhat is the source of truth?Role of Portal
ESIA / Public services / MFCIdentification, power of attorney, submission and result of the serviceSingle entrance and life situation
UIS "Stroycomplex.RF"Federal information on urban development, registers of requirements and documentsSync applicable requirements and statuses
Regional GISOGDRegional town planning information and servicesProcess exchange by object and territory
NSPD / EGRNSpatial data, sites, rights and restrictionsObject map and verification of spatial conditions
EGRZ / ECPEExpertise findings and related documentation setsControl of the examination gate and reuse of solutions
FGIS CSEstimated standards, indices, prices and resource classifiersCost justification and deviation monitoring
EWISSInformation about housing construction and developersHousing Outline, Disclosure and Analytics
Procurement EISPlans, procedures, contracts and procurement performanceRelationship of the purchase with the passport and the schedule of the object
6.1.1. Operational and financial contours
System / OutlineWhat is the source of truth?Role of Portal
GIS TOR KND / IS SupervisionControl actions, risk categories, requirementsRisk-based control and elimination
IPMS and project IPSchedules, TIM, Tasks, Actual Progress and DocumentsOperational management and event exchange
GIS Housing and Utilities / OperationalOperation, condition, applications and repairsDigital passport transfer and feedback
Financial and insurance IPPayments, tranches, guarantees, limits and eventsConfirmation of financing conditions and risk

The architectural ban. You can not transfer all the registers to the portal. Integration is based on the principles of primary source reference, minimum necessary replication, caching with the version and confirmed relevance.

6.2. Role of the project ecosystem

ComponentFunctionResult
SFERAInput needs, initiatives, communities and participantsInitiative and public value
ECO-PPAProgramme, resource, contractual and financial frameworkBalanced project and risk model
SPECZASHCHITAProduction cooperation, consortia and executionMobilization of capacities and delivery of results
EQUILIBRIUMObservation, forecasting, scenarios and early warningExplainable signals and control of the result
IACDecision support, prioritization and deflection managementHuman decision on the basis of evidence
EUTUniform classifiers, protocols and technological rulesCompatibility and repeatability
Unified Construction PortalSingle user and object path, integration and event logIndustry Assemblage Point

7. Unified data model and digital passport

7.1. Data Units

EntityContentsPurpose
ObjectIDInvariant identifier of an object or complexConnects information of all stages
TerritoryIDPlot, zone, territory or linear corridorRelation to Spatial Restrictions
PartyIDOrganization, authority, expert or responsible personRole, authority and responsibility
RequirementIDNorm, technical condition, obligationApplicability and proof of compliance
DocumentIDDocument or information model with versionSource, signature, status and communication
7.1.1. Transactional and Eventual Entities
EntityContentsPurpose
ContractIDContract, contract, tranche or guaranteeCommitment, time, cost and event
ResourceIDMaterial, equipment, labor, power or energyOrigin, quantity and supply
EventIDChange of object statusTime, initiator, foundation, old and new state
EvidenceIDConfirmation of the result or elimination of riskIndependent verification and archive
MetricIDCost, time, quality, impactBasic, planned and actual value

7.2. Mandatory properties of a digital passport

  • Unchangeable connection with primary sources and versions;
  • a single time scale of decisions, approvals, works, deliveries and payments;
  • planned, actual and forecast values of indicators;
  • communication of each decision with authority, document and evidence;
  • machine-readable status of the control gate;
  • rights of access by roles, purposes and classification of information;
  • archive of transfer to operation and subsequent feedback.

The rule of trust. In the interface, the user always sees: where the value is obtained, when it is updated, by whom it is confirmed and what solution depends on its reliability.

8. Cross-cutting process and control gate

The control gate is not an additional coordination, but a machine-readable check of readiness for the next stage. The gates aggregate existing solutions and show missing conditions, responsibility and consequences of the transition.

GateDecisionMinimum amount of evidence
G0Need confirmedPurpose, beneficiaries, territorial need, owner of the initiative
G1Territory AllowedRights, restrictions, urban planning potential, engineering conditions
G2The investment model is sustainableLife cycle cost, financing, risks, scenarios
G3The project is ready for examinationCompleteness, TIM, applicable requirements, conflicts and signatures
8.0.1. Gate G4 - G8: implementation and operation
GateDecisionMinimum amount of evidence
G4Examination and permits obtainedPositive conclusion, corrected comments, permits
G5Contract and resources securedProcurement, contractor, capacities, materials, schedule, warranties
G6Construction is managedFact of work, quality, safety, deviations and corrective actions
G7Object ready to enterCompleteness, testing, executive model, defect elimination
G8Operational results confirmedTransfer of passport, actual indicators, guarantee obligations

8.1. Change management

Any material change in value, duration, design, composition or impact is recorded as an event. The portal calculates the affected requirements, documents, contracts, indicators and control gates, but does not approve the change independently.

  1. the initiator describes the cause and expected effect;
  2. analytics shows the affected connections and scenarios;
  3. authorized persons make a decision and sign it;
  4. the new version becomes valid, the previous one is retained;
  5. The event is sent to all connected systems under agreed contracts.

9. Analytics, artificial intelligence and digital twin

9.1. Functions of the intellectual core

  • Early warning. Identification of the risk of schedule failure, cost increase, resource shortage, defect or security breach.
  • Scenario analysis. Comparison of options for territory, project solution, supply, schedule and financing.
  • Conformity check. Search for discrepancies between passport, TIM, estimate, contracts, schedule and fact.
  • Extracting requirements. Linking norms and conditions to project elements and evidence of implementation.
  • Re-use of knowledge. Search for analogues, standard solutions, causes of deviations and operational feedback.
  • The digital double. Combining spatial, technical, financial, event and operational model of the object.

9.2. Use restrictions AI

  • no opaque automatic denial of service, purchase, admission or financing;
  • mandatory indication of sources, factors, level of confidence and alternatives;
  • Separation of testable rules, statistical models and generative clues;
  • logging requests, model versions and the result that influenced the decision;
  • the right of the user to challenge the signal and transfer the question to the person;
  • regular quality, displacement, safety and applicability of models.

Principle EQUILIBRIUM warns and explains; the authorized person decides and is responsible.

10. Governance, security and legal framework

10.1. Organizational model

LevelCredentials
Interagency CouncilGoals, priorities, authority boundaries, pilots and scaling
Federal CoordinatorPolicy, regulatory support and interaction of system owners
Portal operatorOperation, development, SLA, integration, support and cybersecurity
Data OwnersQuality, legal regime, interfaces, versions and correction of primary data
Regional centresLocal processes, integrations, training and user support
Scientific and Technical CouncilArchitecture, TIM, AI, data standards and technological independence
Independent verificationValidation of the result, KPI, impact, safety and reliability of evidence

10.2. Safety and sustainability

  • Sovereign architecture. Placement and processing in accordance with the data category, Russian requirements and the plan of technological independence.
  • Zero trust. Verify the user, device, role, context and minimum required authority.
  • Segmentation. Separation of open, service, commercial, personal and critical contours.
  • Unchanged audit. Access, modification, signature, source, and solution with undetectable deletion protection.
  • Sustainability. Backup, recovery, autonomous operation of critical processes and regular exercises.
  • Safe development. Threat modeling, dependency analysis, testing, vulnerability management and software supply chain.

10.3. Legal perimeter of the stage 0

Prior to the pilot, a legal card is executed: the status of the operator, the grounds for data exchange, the composition of the digital passport, electronic signature and power of attorney, personal and commercial data, the mode of information models, procurement, control, archival storage, responsibility for the quality and order of challenging analytical signals.

The initial regulatory perimeter includes the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation, legislation on information and data protection, electronic signature, public services, contract system, procurement of certain types of legal entities, shared construction, technical security of buildings and structures, critical information infrastructure and archival business. Current editions and applicability are confirmed by the legal working group before launch.

Normative approach. First, ensure compatibility and legal traceability within the existing powers; only then propose point changes in legislation following the results of the pilot.

11. Economic model, KPI and effects

11.1. Principles of funding

  • Basic public services and mandatory functions are financed as a public digital infrastructure.
  • Integration of the existing state systems is included in the agreed departmental development plans;
  • Pilots can be funded through federal and regional programs, development institutions, and project agreements.
  • Extended B2B-services are allowed only in a separate legal and tariff circuit without limiting access to public functions;
  • ECO-PPA is used as a mechanism to reconcile resources, risks, liabilities and measurable impact of a project, rather than as a substitute for budgetary and procurement rules.

11.2. System of indicators

ContourMetricsPilot Orientation
Object passportProportion of pilot facilities with full passport100%
ReuseProportion of fields obtained from trusted sources without manual inputnot less than 70%
TraceabilityPercentage of significant events and decisions with source and evidencenot less than 90%
Complete gatePercentage of transitions without subsequent return due to missing informationGrowth to the base line
Term of coordinationTime of inter-system and inter-agency coordinationreduction of at least 20%
Rejection of the deadlineThe difference between planned and projected completionEarly Detection to Critical Path
Denial of valueUnjustified change in value relative to the approved baseDecrease to base line
QualityDefects, rework and elimination time frameDecrease to base line
SecurityCritical violations and reaction timeZero tolerance/reduced response
SuppliesProportion of critical resources with proven proven provenance and status100% in the pilot list
Operational readinessComplete transfer of passport, regulations and guarantees100%
User experienceEvaluating key user pathsnot lower than 4,2 of 5

Once the baselines are established, the core KPI expands to an industry-wide register of indicators compatible with ESG-IR 1.0 and a system of 260 human and territory development indicators. The indicators are grouped into 19 modules, life stages and decision-making levels.

11.3. Expected effects

  • For the state. Tracked execution, project comparability, early identification of systemic risks and less duplicative reporting.
  • for regions. A single set of integrations and services while maintaining regional specifics and data.
  • For business. Predictable project path, re-use of information, transparent requirements, access to cooperation and resources.
  • For citizens. Clear status, participation in the formation of the need, access to results and feedback.
  • For the industry. Accumulation of knowledge of the full life cycle, improving the quality of solutions and the development of domestic technologies.

12. MVP, pilot and road map

12.1. Composition MVP

MVP confirms the architecture on real processes and does not try to cover all 19 modules at once. The minimum product includes:

  • single input via ESIA and role model;
  • digital passport and ObjectID;
  • spatial map of the territory;
  • Journal of events, versions, decisions and evidence;
  • five key integrations: Public Services, Construction Complex.RF/GISOGD, NSPD/EGRN, EGRZ, FGIS CS;
  • G0-G4 and prototype G5-G8;
  • basic dashboards of time, cost, completeness and risk;
  • Verification archive and feedback mechanism.

12.2. Plan for the first 90 days

PeriodFocusResult
Days 1–15Mandate and boundariesWorking group, map of authority, process owners, pilot selection
Days 16–30ArchitectureDigital passport v0.1, data card, integration contracts, threat model
Days 31–60PrototypeSingle entrance, passport, event log, object map, first integrations and gates
Days 61–75TestUser scenarios, load, security, data quality, training
Days 76–90PilotThree objects, baseline measurement, independent verification and phase solution 2

12.3. Pilot types of objects

ContourWhat we checkRecommended scale
HousingCheck the bundle of land, EITI, permits, financing, construction and inputOne complex residential development object
Social infrastructureCheck budget, purchase, standard solution, control and commissioningSchool, polyclinic or sports facility
Industrial and infrastructure facilityCheck cooperation, materials, logistics, security and ECO-PPACandidate: Syzran-Rameno-Smolkino cluster, after a separate decision

12.4. Road map 2026–2030

PeriodStageKey result
2026Design and PilotPassport standard, MVP, three types of objects, assessment of legal and technological gaps
2027Regional replicationConnection of selected subjects, typical integrations, training and service model
2028Federal ScalabilityExtension of modules, life situations, industry registries and independent verification
2029Economics of CooperationResource balances, production capacities, logistics, insurance and life cycle services
2030Predictive managementDigital twins of territories, early warning and feedback in norms and programs

13. Risks and solutions required to start

13.1. Register of key risks

RiskManifestationManagement
Duplication of systemsCreating another base and cabinetInventory, architectural ban on unreasonable replication
Blurring of powersIt is unclear who is taking and responding.Matrix of decisions, sources of truth and legal grounds
Poor data qualityDisagreements block the process or distort the analyticsField owner, quality control, correction procedure in the primary source
Resistance of participantsAdditional load and system bypassReducing manual input, joint path design, training
Dependence on supplierClosed formats and high cost of changesOpen API, export, modularity, state ownership of key specifications
CyberattackViolation of accessibility, integrity or confidentialitySegmentation, zero trust, reservation, constant monitoring
Invalid signal AIAn incorrect recommendation affects the decisionThe person in the outline, explanatory, testing, logging, right of challenge
Regional gapInequality of actorsTypical cloud core, adapters, connection funding and competence center
Unsustainable financingStopping after the pilotFull cost of ownership plan and permanent operator decision up to phase 2
Unproven effectScaling without resultsBaseline, pilot KPI and independent verification

13.2. Seven solutions to launch

  1. To approve the Unified Construction Portal as an integration layer of the object’s life cycle, and not a replacement for existing systems.
  2. Identify a federal coordinator and form an interdepartmental council with the participation of owners of key systems.
  3. In 30 days, you will be tasked with mapping processes, data, authorities and integrations.
  4. Approve the standard of digital passport v0.1, ObjectID and event log for pilot.
  5. Choose three pilot objects and fix the owners of the result, base lines and KPI.
  6. Define operator MVP, safety model and budget of the total cost of the pilot.
  7. After 90 days, consider the independent report and decide on regional replication.

Bottom line. A single construction portal should make the object manageable through departments, organizations and stages - without destroying the current digital vertical and without transferring responsibility to the algorithm.

ANNEX A

The responsibility matrix on the pilot

Solution / ProcessWho claimsWho performsWho is attracted
Goals and PilotsInteragency CouncilFederal CoordinatorRegions, customers, industry
Passport StandardFederal CoordinatorThe Architectural CouncilSystem owners, operator
IntegrationsOwners of systemsPortal operatorRegional IT teams
Data qualityPrimary Source OwnerQuality Control OperatorUsers and Audit
Pilot processOwner of the objectProject OfficeAll participants in the life cycle
Analytical signalsAuthorized personEQUILIBRIUM / IACExperts and Data Owners
SecurityOperator and system ownerthe Center of Information SecurityConnected participants
Effect evaluationInteragency CouncilIndependent VerifierProject office and users

ANNEX B

Minimum requirements for the integration contract

  1. the owner and legal basis for the provision of data;
  2. composition, semantics, classifiers and permissible values;
  3. identifiers of the object, territory, participant and document;
  4. Receiving mode: request, event, package or reference;
  5. version, time of relevance and cancellation procedure;
  6. requirements for electronic signature and power of attorney;
  7. SLA, error handling, re-delivery and reconciliation;
  8. data category, access log, storage and deletion;
  9. responsibility for quality and correction procedure;
  10. conditions for testing, monitoring and changing the interface.

Annex B

Short dictionary

TermDefinition
Archive of evidenceA related set of signed documents, events, measurements, and conclusions that confirm the decision or result.
Check gateComputer-readable verification of the readiness of the object for the next stage on the basis of existing decisions and evidence.
ObjectIDAn immutable object identifier that links records of different systems and stages.
Event MagazineChronology of changes in the state of the object with the source, time, initiator and basis.
The Source of TruthA system or registry that is legally or organizationally mandated to maintain specific information.
Digital passportCross-cutting representation of the object: identifiers, statuses, participants, documents, models, events, metrics and evidence.
Digital twinA related model of the current and forecast state of an object or territory for scenario analysis.
ECO-PPAProject mechanism for harmonizing resources, commitments, risks and measurable environmental, social and economic outcomes.

Annex G

Official sources and points of integration

  • The Russian government has updated the strategic direction of digital transformation of construction and housing and utilities until 2030
  • UIS "Stroycomplex.RF"
  • FGIS EDS NSPD — Rosreestr
  • NSPD portal
  • Unified State Register of Conclusions — Glavgosexpertiza of Russia
  • FGIS CS - Minstroy Russia
  • Unified housing information system
  • Unified information system in procurement
  • Public services - issuing a building permit
  • Glavgosexpertiza of Russia — digital vertical of the construction industry

Sources are used to determine the current digital perimeter. The specific composition of integrations, legal grounds and current versions of normative acts are subject to confirmation at the stage 0.

Other published edition: SINGLE BUILDING PORTAL Ediny_stroitelny_portal_Prezentatsiya.pptx · web text +

State digital ecosystem of full life cycle management of capital construction objects

One object - a single digital passport - a managed life cycle

Initiator: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich • Moscow • 2026

Version 1.0

DOES NOT DOUBLE

MAIN THESIS

Not another portal.

COMMUNICATE

existing GIS, registers,

services and powers

object, data, solutions,

Responsibility and result

Construction complex.RF • GISOGD • NSPD / EGRN • EGRZ

FGIS CS • EWISS • Procurement EIS • Public services • ICUP

A portal is a trusted integration and transaction layer around an object.

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

One object - seven breaks

EASTERN SITUATION

Gaps make the project

a Set of Unrelated Windows

ID

Object

Versions

Roles

Data

Risks

Reverse

Communication

Result

Risk becomes visible after losing time and money — instead of an early scenario warning.

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

Target model: one ID and passport

ARCHITECTURE

The object becomes the central unit of management - not a departmental form.

DURATION

COSTS

Plan • fact • forecast

Base • change • cause

ObjectID

DIGITAL PASSPORT

Events • Version • Sources • Evidence

QUALITY

SAFETY

Defect • Elimination • Proof

Risk • reaction • liability

Source → version → power → solution → proof

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

Object life cycle: 10 stages

PROCESS

Need

Land and territory

Investment Model

Design

Expertise

and permissions

Procurement

and contract

Construction and supply

Monitoring

and input

Operation and repair

Renovation / Conclusion

At each stage, a measurable result and an archive of evidence.

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

19 modules — four functional layers

FUNCTIONAL MODEL

6–10

11–16

17–19

ZAMYSEL

AND TERRITORY

PROJECT

AND AUTHORIZATION

EXECUTION

EXPLOITATION

AND KNOWLEDGE

Initiatives

Land and territory

Digital passport

Participants

Requirements

TIM and research

Expertise

Permits and services

Cost

Financing

Procurement

Cooperation

Materials and logistics

Construction management

Monitoring

Input

Operation and repair

Impact and verification

Analytics and Forecasting

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

Ecosystem roles without parallel vertical

RESPONSIBILITY

Each component is responsible for its own measurable result.

SFERA

ECO-PPA

Requirements • initiatives • participants

Program • resources • contract • risk

SINGLE

PORTAL

ObjectID

passport • events

SPECZASHCHITA

EQUILIBRIUM

Cooperation • execution • delivery

Observation • forecast • verification

IAC - Decision Support

A person affirms and bears responsibility

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

The portal connects, but does not replace

STATE ARCHITECTURE

EXISTING

SYSTEMS

The Source of Truth

LAST

THE SINGLE WAY

ESIA / Public Services

Construction complex.RF

Regional GISOGD

NSPD / EGRN

EGRZ / ECPE

FGIS CS

EITI / EITI Procurement

ICUP / supervision / housing and communal services

the Registry Owner

• Outdoor API

• event exchange

• link to primary source

• minimum replication

• version and time of relevance

ObjectID

Digital passport

Event Magazine

Check gate

Archive of evidence

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

Digital passport: a single data model

TRUST IN DATA

ObjectID + TerritoryID

object, complex, site, zone or linear corridor

PartyID

Role, authority and responsibility of the participant

RequirementID + DocumentID

requirement, applicability, version, signature and source

ContractID + ResourceID

commitment, term, cost, material and delivery

EventID + EvidenceID

change, initiator, basis and confirmation

MetricID

base • planned • actual • forecast value

User always sees: source • time • version • confirmation • dependent solution

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

Check gate G0-G8

TRANSITION MANAGEMENT

Not a new agreement, but a machine-readable check of readiness for the next stage.

Need

Verified

Territory

Permissible

Model

Stable

Project is ready

the Expertise

Expertise

and permissions

Contract

and resources

Stroyka

Managed

Readiness

to enter

Result

Verified

The portal shows the missing conditions; the decision is made by the authorized person.

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

WARNING. COMPARISON. Explains.

AI AND DIGITAL DOUBLE

Analytics explains - a person decides

Early warning

term • cost • resources • quality • safety

Scenario analysis

Territory • Project • Supply • Schedule • Financing

Conformity check

passport • TIM • estimate • contract • fact

Extraction of claims

norm → project element → proof

Re-use of knowledge

analogs • causes of deviations • feedback

0 opaque automatic refusals, sanctions or ratings

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

Trust, security, independent verification

CONTOUR OF MANAGEMENT

SAFETY

LEGAL

TRAVELING

INDEPENDENT

VERIFICATION

Sovereign architecture

Zero trust

Segmentation of contours

Unchanged audit

Reservations

Safe development

Source and owner

Reason for access

Electronic signature

Version of the solution

Right of challenge

Archive of evidence

Base Line

Pilots KPI

Verification of the result

Impact check

Security Check

Decision on scale

Signal AI is disputed. The decision is signed by the person and is responsible.

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

MVP for 90 days

STARTING

DAYS 1–15

DAYS 16–30

DAYS 31–60

DAYS 61–75

DAYS 76–90

Mandate

and borders

Architecture

Prototype

Test

Pilot

MVP = 8 Mandatory elements

1 Single entrance and roles

2 ObjectID and digital passport

3 Spatial card

4 Event and Version Log

5 Five Key Integrations

6 Gate G0–G4 + Prototype G5–G8

7 Dashboards of time, cost and risk

8 Verification archive and feedback

Three real objects • base line • independent report • phase decision 2

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

Pilot and scaling 2026–2030

ROAD MAP

THREE TYPES OF PILOT OBJECTS

MASSHTAB

2026

Passport Standard • MVP • Pilot

HOUSING

Land • USGS • Resolution • Financing • Input

2027

Regional replication

SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE

2028

Extension of modules and registries

budget • procurement • standard solution • operation

2029

Economics of cooperation and resources

INDUSTRIAL-INFRASTRUCTURE

cooperation • logistics • security • ECO-PPA

Predictive management and feedback

Candidate: Syzran-Rameno-Smolkino (separate decision)

Scaling - only after the confirmed effect.

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

Seven solutions to launch

SUBJECT OF AGREEMENT

Approve the portal as the integration layer of the object life cycle.

Select three pilot objects and the owners of the result.

Identify a federal coordinator and an interagency council.

Determine operator MVP, safety and full pilot budget.

In 30 days, prepare a map of processes, data and authorities.

In 90 days to decide on regional replication.

Approve passport v0.1, ObjectID and event log.

To make the object manageable through departments, organizations and stages - without destroying the current digital vertical and without transferring responsibility to the algorithm.

SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL

Sources cited in presentation 22

  • Draft concept "Single construction portal", version 1.0, 25.08.2026.
  • The Government of the Russian Federation is the strategic direction of digital transformation of construction and housing and utilities up to 2030 years: https://government.ru/news/57980/
  • Construction complex.RF: https://стройкомплекс.рф/
  • FGIS EDS NSPD — Rosreestr: https://rosreestr.gov.ru/activity/gosudarstvennye-programmy/natsionalnaya-sistema-prostranstvennykh-dannykh/fgis-etsp-nspd/
  • The draft concept "Single Construction Portal", section 2 - the initial situation and the task.
  • The draft concept of "Single Construction Portal", sections 3 and 7 - target model and digital passport.
  • The project of the concept "Single Construction Portal", section 4.2 - ten stages of the end-to-end life cycle.
  • The project concept "Single construction portal", section 5 - nineteen functional modules.
  • Draft concept "Single construction portal", section 6.2 - the role of the project ecosystem.
  • NSPD portal: https://nspd.gov.ru/
  • Unified State Register of Conclusions: https://gge.ru/services/egrz/
  • FGIS CS: https://fgiscs.minstroyrf.ru/
  • Unified housing information system: https://наш.дом.рф/
  • Unified information system in procurement: https://zakupki.gov.ru/
  • Public services — building permit: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/600168/1
  • The project of the concept "Single Construction Portal", section 7 - a single data model and a digital passport.
  • The project concept "Single Construction Portal", section 8 - through process and control gate.
  • The project of the concept "Single Construction Portal", section 9 - analytics, artificial intelligence and digital twin.
  • Draft concept "Single construction portal", section 10 - management, security and legal contour.
  • The draft concept "Single Construction Portal", section 12.1–12.2 - composition MVP and plan for the first 90 days.
  • The project concept "Single construction portal", sections 12.3–12.4 - pilots and road map.
  • The draft concept "Single Construction Portal", section 13.2 - seven solutions for launch.

Other published edition: SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL Single_building_portal_architecture_398-p.docx · web text +

Architecture of a single digital platform for construction management and housing and utilities

Concept and top-level technical task in the development of the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 2 March 2026 No 398-r

Horizon2030
SubjectConstruction + Utilities + OX Life Cycle
The architectural principleRegistry core + process layer + TIM + integration + analytics/AI
VersionConcept 1.0 / August 2026

Regulatory basis: Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 02.03.2026 of 398-p. Official publication: government.ru.

1. Summary of the decision

It is proposed to create a single digital contour of the management of the capital construction object and municipal infrastructure - from initiative, land-urban preparation and design to commissioning, operation, repair and modernization.

  • The platform does not replace the existing state information systems, but connects them through single data entities, API and event exchange.
  • The center of architecture is a digital passport of the object and a single history of decisions, documents, models, deadlines, cost and responsibility.
  • The TIM/information model is seen as a working lifecycle model rather than as a separate designer file.
  • For the authorities, a management outline is formed: monitoring the timing, risks, cost, digital maturity and data quality.
  • For the market, there is a single participant’s office, clear procedures, machine-readable documents and a reduction in manual re-entry data.

2. Normative binding to order No. 398-r

ContourFunctionResult
The Unified Digital EnvironmentLink federal, regional and facility management levelsDigital Outline of the Industry
Electronic proceduresConvert the interaction of participants of the investment and construction cycle to digital formReducing time and transaction costs
TIM and Digital TwinsUse information models throughout the life cycleTrackable object digital twin
Construction complex.RF / GISOGDProvide data exchange and integrationA unified picture of spatial and urban data
UtilitiesElectronic passports of municipal infrastructure and digital accounting of housing stockTransition from documents to data and events
AIAutomate control, analysis and adoption of standard decisionsRisk forecasting and productivity improvement

3. Target architecture

Five levels of platform

ContourFunctionResult
1. Registry CoreObjects, participants, documents, models, networks, contracts, eventsUnified version of truth
2. Process layerRoutes, statuses, coordination, control of terms and responsibilityManaged investment and construction cycle
3. TIM / Digital DoubleModel versions, verification, comments, executive and operational modelEnd-to-end life cycle model
4. Service layerCabinets, Superservices, Notifications, Electronic FormsConvenient interaction of participants
5. Analytics and AIRisks, cost, timing, quality, maturity, forecastManagement decisions on data

4. Data Model: Main Entities

Capital construction object: Single identifier, address / coordinates, type, stage, parameters, status.

Territory / land: Borders, rights, restrictions, urban conditions, infrastructure.

Project: Goals, parameters, stages, financing, schedule, budget, responsible.

Information model: TIM version, composition, format, checks, comments, relationship to documentation and fact.

Document: Type, version, author, status, machine-readable structure, signature, connection to the procedure.

Procedure / coordination: Foundation, participants, deadline, decision, comments, result.

Contract / commitment: Parties, subject, price, terms, stages, performance, security.

Work / stage: Plan, fact, resources, scope, executor, quality control.

Engineering network / housing and communal services facility: Passport, characteristics, condition, accidents, repairs, investment activities.

Event: Status change, incident, check, data upload, decision, rejection.

5. Functional modules MVP

Module 1. Digital object passport

Single object card; participants; stage; key indicators; decision history; related models and documents.

Module 2. The route of the investment and construction cycle

Step-by-step route of procedures; dependencies; responsible; deadlines; locks; automatic notifications.

Module 3. TIM / digital model

Download; view; versions; checks; collisions; comments; binding to estimates, schedules and executive documentation.

Module 4. Examination and approval

Completeness; comments; answers; electronic solutions; control of regulatory deadlines.

Module 5. Construction control

Plan-fact; executive documentation; photo/video; prescriptions; acts; deviations from design decisions.

Module 6. Utilities

Electronic passport; TU; connections; accidents; repairs; investment activities; readiness for the heating season.

Module 7. Operation and Housing

Transfer of the object; technical condition; appeals; maintenance; overhaul; data for GIS of housing and communal services.

Module 8. Analytical Center

Dashboards; timing; cost; risks; data quality; problem rating; digital maturity; AI-forecast.

6. Role model

RoleWorkflow
Federal RegulatorPolicies, indicators, monitoring, regulatory requirements, interagency coordination
Region / municipalityPortfolio of objects, town planning procedures, infrastructure, time control
State CustomerPlanning, budget, contracting, project progress, acceptance
Developer / InvestorProject route, documents, approvals, terms, risks
Technical customerDesign and construction management, quality control and deadlines
DesignerTIM, documentation, versions, responses to comments
Examination / supervisionTests, observations, conclusions, prescriptions, model use
ContractorProduction of works, executive documentation, plan-fact
RSO / management organizationConnections, operation, accidents, repairs, technical condition
Citizen / ownerStatuses of services, addresses, housing and communal services data, digital interaction

7. Integration architecture

Principle: API-first, event exchange and no re-entry of information already in government systems.

  • EGISOGD "Stroykompleks.RF" and regional GISOGD/ISOGD.
  • FGIS EGRZ and the contours of state expertise.
  • FGIS CS and estimated price data.
  • EHRN and housing sector data.
  • GIS Housing and "Public Services House".
  • NSPD and cadastral-spatial services of Rosreestr.
  • EPGU/Public Services and Electronic Public Services.
  • Information systems of project management of state customers.
  • GIS TOR KND and digital state control/supervision.
  • Corporate ERP/PM/SOD/TIM environments of market participants through standardized API.

8. Technological architecture

ContourFunctionResult
Client LayerWeb/mobile cabinets, adaptive interface, role-oriented desktopsUnified user experience
API GatewayAuthentication, routing, quotas, loggingSecure Integrations
Process EngineBPMN/state machine, SLA, task routingEnforceable regulations
Master Data / RegistryUniform directories and identifiersData consistency
Documents and signatureEDI, versions, UCEP, machine-readable formsLegally significant digital process
TIM-servicesModel storage, viewer, checks, IFC/open formatsDigital twin
Data Lake / DWHHistory, telemetry, aggregates, showcasesAnalytical base
AI-servicesClassification, search, verification, forecast, detection of anomaliesReduction of manual labor
Integration tyreEvents, queues, ETL/ELT, APIConnectivity of federal and regional systems
Information security and auditRole Model, Segmentation, Action Log, ReservationSustainability and trust

9. Priority scenarios AI

  • Automatic verification of the completeness of the package of documents before submission.
  • Semantic comparison of requirements of regulatory documents with project solutions.
  • Search for contradictions between documents, TIM model, estimate and calendar schedule.
  • Forecast of the risk of failure of deadlines and exceeding the budget for the portfolio of objects.
  • Identification of anomalies in executive documentation and photo fixation.
  • Risk profile of contractor and supplier based on confirmed performance data.
  • Forecasting the emergency utility infrastructure by state, age and telemetry.
  • Intellectual assistant of the participant of the investment and construction cycle on procedures and statuses.

10. System of indicators

ContourFunctionResult
DeadlinesMedian duration of key procedures; duration of the full cycleReduction of project time
DigitalizationProportion of procedures without paper duplication; percentage of documents readable by machinesTransition to data
TIMPercentage of objects with current information model; Percentage of checks on the modelThe real use of the digital twin
IntegrationsPercentage of information received automatically; number of repeated manual inputsSeamlessness
QualityNumber of errors/returns; completeness and relevance of dataIncreased reliability
CostBudget/fact deviation; transaction and approval costsReduction of unproductive losses
UtilitiesCompleteness of electronic passports; accident; recovery timeInfrastructure management as at
ManagementProportion of objects with early detection of risk; response time to deviationProactive management

11. Road map of implementation

Stage 0 — 8–12 weeks — Architectural survey; entity register; integration map; pilot selection; regulatory matrix; interface layout.

Stage 1 - 4–6 months - MVP: object passport, route, documents, TIM-viewer, dashboard, 3–5 integrations.

Stage 2 — 6–12 months — Construction control, communal infrastructure, expansion of integrations, electronic acts, regional portfolio.

Stage 3 - 12–18 months - Operation / Housing, AI-scenarios, digital twin, replication to several regions.

Stage 4 - up to 2030 - Scaling, data model unification, industrial operation, industry showcases and interregional analysis.

12. Recommended Pilot

The pilot should not be a “portal for the sake of the portal”, but a demonstration of the through passage of one real object through a digital route.

  • One region / one major customer / 3–10 objects.
  • Fixed set of procedures: baseline data → Design → Expertise → permission → Construction → Executive documentation → input.
  • Mandatory TIM model and digital passport of the object.
  • Integrations with Stroykompleks.RF/regional GISOGD, expertise, NSPD and customer system.
  • Control metrics before/after: the duration of the procedure, the number of manual inputs, returns, errors, delays, reporting time.

13. Organizational model

ContourFunctionResult
Project CouncilMinstroy/region/customer/operator/key departmentsDecisions on priorities and barriers
The Architectural CommitteeData, integrations, TIM, IS, standardsIntegrity of architecture
Product officeCustom scripts, backlog, metricsRapid product development
Data and Quality CenterNSI, passports, quality rules, shop windowsTrust in data
TIM Competence CenterFormats, models, checks, trainingUniform rules for working with models
Operation CenterSLA, incidents, releases, stabilityIndustrial reliability

14. Architectural principles

  • Data once: information is entered or retrieved from the primary source and reused.
  • The object as a digital entity: all documents and events are associated with a single passport.
  • Open interfaces: integrations through documented API and events.
  • Default machine readability: XML/JSON/structured forms instead of "PDF as databases".
  • Validity and provability: history of changes, authorship, signature and audit of each critical action.
  • Federality: Uniform rules and data models while maintaining regional and corporate systems.
  • Security by architecture: minimum rights, segmentation, logging, redundancy and control of the software supply chain.
  • Import independence: the priority of domestic components and portable open formats.

15. Decisions to be taken to launch

  • Approve the product owner and pilot territory/customer.
  • Approve the canonical data model and object identifier.
  • Define 5–7 mandatory integrations of the first stage.
  • Choose a reference route of the investment and construction cycle for MVP.
  • Record the requirements for the TIM model and the general data environment.
  • Approve KPI pilot and method of effect measurement.
  • Form an interdepartmental architectural group and a product office.

Sources

1. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 02.03.2026 No. 398-r "On approval of the strategic direction in the field of digital transformation of construction industries and housing and communal services of the Russian Federation up to 2030 years". Official website of the Government of Russia: https://government.ru/docs/all/163630/

2. Official PDF of the order: https://static.government.ru/media/files/A6eGtkkDnhcpleQoLgSn8XTLxP5RCvBT.pdf

The document is a conceptual architecture and does not replace regulations, technical requirements of state information systems and mandatory information security procedures.

Other published edition: SINGLE CONSTRUCTION PORTAL Single_building_portal_398-p_presentation.pptx · web text +

Unified digital platform of construction management and housing and utilities

ANALYTICS + AI

SERVICES AND CABLES

TIM / DIGITAL DOUBLE

PROCESS LAY

Architecture in the development of the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 2 March 2026 No 398-r

REGISTER NUCLEAR

CONSTRUCTION → ENTER → EXPLOITATION → Utilities

Concept 1.0 • August 2026

Why we need a platform now

No398-r sets the industry target state: a single digital environment, end-to-end procedures, TIM, digital twins, AI and digital housing and utilities.

The State Task

Technological transition

The HVAC as a continuation of the cycle

Convert the interaction of the participants of the investment and construction cycle to electronic form and reduce the duration of procedures.

Use TIM on the life cycle of the object and form digital twins of capital construction objects.

Electronic passports of municipal infrastructure, digital accounting of housing stock and platform management of housing and communal services.

The key gap today

→ Unified version of the truth about the object

Disjointed systems

Re-entering data

PDF instead of data

Lack of a single object history

Source: Government of Russia, Order No. 398-r of 02.03.2026.

Target architecture: 5 levels

The platform links data, processes, digital models, services, and management without creating another isolated GIS.

Forecast of timing, cost, risks, accidents; control of digital maturity

ANALYTICS AND AI

Role cabinets, super services, notifications, electronic forms

SERVICE SLAY

Versions of models, inspections, executive and operational model

TIM / DIGITAL DOUBLE

Routes, statuses, SLA, coordination, tasks, responsibility

PROCESS LAY

Objects, participants, documents, networks, contracts, events

REGISTER NUCLEAR

End-to-end object life cycle

The main object of management is not a document and not a departmental procedure, but a single digital essence of the OKS.

Initiative

Land / GPA

Searches

Design

Expertise

Permission

Construction

Input

Operation

Kapremont / Modernization

Object ID • Spatial Data • Participants • documents • TIM • Timeline • cost • Solutions • Events • technical condition

SINGLE DIGITAL PASSPORT OBJECT

One story of the object - from the first solution to operation.

Data Model: What Connects the Platform

If there are no common entities and identifiers, integration turns into file sharing.

OBJECT

TERRITORY

PROJECT

TIM MODEL

DOCUMENT

PROCEDURE

CONTRACT

WORK / STAGE

NETWORK / ACCOMMODATION

EVENT

Connection graph: who → that → when → on what basis → with what result

MVP: 8 functional modules

The first release should show the full digital route of the object, not the maximum number of functions.

Object passport

Route ISC

TIM / Model

Expertise

Construction Control

Utilities

Operation / Utilities

Analytical Center

MVP = digital passport + route + Model + documents + control + 3–5 Integrations + Dashboard Management

Role model: one object - different jobs

Each role has its own set of tasks and KPI, but all work with one digital history of the object.

Federal Regulator

Region / municipality

Customer / Investor

Designer / Expert

Policies • KPI • monitoring

Portfolio • procedures • infrastructure

Terms • budget • decisions

TIM • documentation • comments

Contractor / technical customer

RSO / UK

Oversight

Citizen / owner

Works • acts • plan-fact

Connections • condition • accident

Inspections •

Services • calls • housing and communal services

Integration circuit

The platform is an orchestrator and a single point of user interaction, not a duplicate of primary state registers.

Public services

Construction complex.RF

GIS Utilities

SINGLE

BUILDING PORTAL

EWISS

GIZOGD

EGRZ / examination

NSPD / Rosreestr

ICUP

API • Events • Data Showcase • single identifiers • machine-readable formats

Top-level technology stack

The architecture should be modular, federative and portable between regions and customers.

Web / Mobile / Offices

Role-Oriented UX

API Gateway + IAM

Authentication, routing, audit

BPM / process engine

Implementing Regulations and SLA

Master Data + Registry

NSIs and common identifiers

Documents + UKEP

Versions and legal significance

TIM-services + CDE

Models, viewer, checks

DWH / Data Lake

History, telemetry, showcases

AI-services

Search, control, forecast, anomalies

Integration Bus

API, Events, ETL/ELT

Information security / monitoring

Segmentation, logs, reservation

AI: Only where there is a measurable effect

AI does not replace a legally significant solution - it reduces manual work, detects risks and prepares an evidence base.

Completeness

Regulatory control

Coherence

Timing and budget

Checking the package before serving

Comparison of requirements and project solutions

Documents ↔ TIM ↔ estimate ↔ schedule

Deviation forecast

Construction Control

Counterparts

Utilities

Assistant

Anomalies in acts and photo fixation

Risk profile of execution

Accident forecast

Tips on routes and statuses

KPI Platform

Evaluate not the number of functions, but the change in speed, quality and transparency of the investment and construction cycle.

DATE

DIGITALIZATION

TIM

INTEGRATION

Duration of procedures and full cycle

the proportion of processes without paper duplicate

model relevance and the proportion of model checks

share of data without re-entering

QUALITY

COSTS

Utilities

GOVERNANCE

errors, returns, completeness of data

Rejection Budget / Fact

completeness of passports, accident, recovery

Early detection of risks and speed of reaction

Main effect: less manual labor + less returns + earlier risk + faster input object

Pilot: one real object outline

The pilot has to prove the reduction of time and number of manual operations on specific procedures.

1 region / 1 customer

Mandatory TIM

Cross-country route

3–10 objects

Single Digital Passport

from source data to input

3–5 Integrations

Metrics "before / after"

Dashboard Management

GISOGD, expertise, NSPD, ISUP

terms, inputs, returns, errors

events, risks, blocking

The purpose of the pilot: not to introduce "everything", but to prove the performance of a single digital history of the object.

Road map

From an architectural survey to a replicable industry platform.

8–12 weeks

4–6 months

6–12 months

12–18 months

up to 2030

Architecture

Data Model

Pilot

MVP

Passport

route

TIM

Construction Control

Utilities networks

Integration

Operation

AI

several regions

Scaling

Unification

Industry Showcases

Each stage ends with a measurable result and a scaling decision.

Organizational management model

Technology without a data owner and process owner will not have an industry effect.

Project Council

The Architectural Committee

Product office

Priorities and inter-agency solutions

Data • TIM • integration •

Backlog • UX • metrics • releases

Data Center

TIM Competence Center

Operation Center

NSI • quality • shop windows

Formats • rules • training

SLA • Incidents • Sustainability

What you need to approve for launch

Seven solutions translate the concept from presentation to pilot project.

Product Owner and Pilot Area

Canonical data model and object ID

5–7 mandatory integrations MVP

Reference route of the investment and construction cycle

Requirements for TIM and general data environment

KPI pilots and the method of effect

Interdepartmental architectural group and product office

Next step: architectural survey + Pilot's Choice + layout of key screens

Normative support

Key theses of the presentation are built on the official text of the order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 398-r.

Order of the Government of the Russian Federation 02.03.2026 № 398-r

"Strategic direction in the field of digital transformation of construction and housing and communal services of the Russian Federation up to 2030".

Official publication

government.ru/docs/all/163630/

Official PDF

static.government.ru/media/files/A6eGtkkDnhcpleQoLgSn8XTLxP5RCvBT.pdf

The concept of the platform is a project proposal and should be detailed taking into account the requirements of specific state information systems, information interaction regulations and information security requirements.

Published files

Territories · Full published text

Parks of Russia and the World: Cities of Knowledge

Source Status: Primary Document

Presentation of the model of parks and cities of knowledge as an environment for education, culture, science and development of territories.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/parki-rossii-i-mira-goroda-znaniya

Open on the site

Ecosystems • Science • Sport • Rehabilitation • Tourism • Culture • Franchising

Park Superclass in architecture EQUILIBRIUM

PARK → COMMUNITY → KNOWLEDGE → ECONOMY → CITY

1. Park - the minimum unit of the City of Knowledge

From the object of improvement to the mechanism of territorial development

A new generation park is a natural and social core around which knowledge, health, economy and urban environment are consistently gathered.

PARK

COMMUNITY

KNOWLEDGE

ECONOMY

CITY

Building the “city of the future” is expensive and risky. Starting from the park allows you to prove demand, gather an audience, launch events and gradually increase functions.

2. Typology of parks

The Superclass model combines functions that normally exist separately.

Urban

Environmental

Scientific

Sporty

Public life

Biocenoses and climate

Education and R&D

activity and result

Rehabilitation

Culturally

Technological

Touristic

Recovery

Events and Heritage

Demonstration of solutions

flows and impressions

The goal is not to choose one type, but to assemble a managed hybrid ecosystem.

3. World models: what we carry and what we do not copy

The best parks are long-term institutions, not one-time construction sites

Professional operator + public-private management

Central Park

Linked network of parks and green corridors

Singapore / City in Nature

Nature + architecture + technology + tourism

Gardens by the Bay

Revitalization of infrastructure through public space

High Line

Training + Studies + Sports + Life

University campuses

The key lesson: the park must have an operator, a financial model, event programming, a data system and responsibility for the result.

4. Russia: strong elements already exist

The task is to assemble them into a single reproducible system

Zaryadye

VDNH

Gorky Park / Museon

Nature + Media + Culture

Events + Museums + Education

urban activity + culture

Krasnodar Park

Sochi

Kazan

landscape + holistic design

Sports + tourism + heritage events

Systemic development of public spaces

The next level is a network of new generation parks, which become the starting centers for the development of territories.

5. Park Superclass: The Hybrid Ecosystem

Eight circuits work as a single organism

KNOWLEDGE

SPORT

NATURE

REHABILITATION

PARK

SUPERCLASS

DIGITAL

TOURISM

ECONOMY

CULTURE

6. Growth Path: From the Park to the City of Knowledge

Each next stage is based on an already working economy and community.

Park

Park of Knowledge

Campus

Cluster

City of Knowledge

Nature + stream

Education + events

University + R&D

Sports + Rehabilitation + Tourism

housing + services + economy

Principle: First, proven flow and social value - then capital-intensive urban infrastructure.

7. Science and Education: The Engine of the City of Knowledge

The park becomes a research ground and an open university

Biocenosis monitoring point

University programs

Laboratory of Urban Ecology

Children and Family University

Sports Science Center

Pilots of materials and energy

Design schools and workshops

Startups and applied research

Observation → study → training → application → entrepreneurship → social effect

8. Superclass: sport, health, rehabilitation

The contour of human development - from mass activity to science

MASS

PROFESSIONAL

REHABILITATION

SCIENTIFIC

routes • family sport • availability

preparation • analytics • competitions

restoration • adaptive sport

Physiology • Biomechanics • Data

The park becomes an infrastructure not only for recreation, but also for measurable human development.

9. Tourism and events - the engine of flow

Year-round calendar creates economy, recognition and international appeal

International Games

Scientific festivals

Cultural Seasons

Sports + Humanitarian Diplomacy

Education + Technology

art + heritage

Ecological expeditions

Health tourism

Family programs

Nature + civil science

rehabilitation + service

Human • Nature • Knowledge

The event is not an end in itself. It should increase repeat visits, average length of stay and economic activity around the park.

10. EQUILIBRIUM — the Digital Nervous System

Park and city are managed as a dynamic ecosystem, not a set of objects

Air • Water • Biodiversity

ENVIRONMENT

FORECAST

attendance • routes • download

FLOWS

KPI

IAC

EQUILIBRIUM

impersonal activity • load

HEALTH

Revenue • Rent • Download

ECONOMY

SIGNALS

Energy • Water • Loss

RESOURCES

DIGITAL DOUBLE

audience • geography • effect

EVENTS

11. Economy: mixed financial architecture

Public functions + private equity + operator revenues

Budget / Municipality

PPP / Concession

basic infrastructure • ecology

Sports • Tourism • Engineering

Private investment

Trust funds / sponsors

hotels • food • services

Science • Culture • Social Programs

Operator's income

Franchising / Licenses

Rent • events • education

Scaling Brand and Modules

Financial sustainability should be designed simultaneously with the landscape and infrastructure - not after construction.

12. Franchising: how to scale the network

Not a pure franchise, but a hybrid "brand + operator + standards + PPP + licenses"

Brand • architectural standard • training

Regional Operator

MASTER FRANCHISE

full operating model

operator of a particular park

PARK FRANCHISE

sport • rehabilitation • children's center • gastronomy

profile business

MODULE FRANCHISE

digital services • methods • content

University / Center

LICENSE

Localization by country

National Partner

INTERNATIONAL LICENSE

Network standard: brandbook • architectural code • Ecology • economy • Digital Platform • Training • Audit • annual certification

13. Pilot and road map

From the territory passport to the first working core - then to the cluster and the city

0–3 months

3–6 months

6–18 months

18–36 months

3–7 years

After the effect

territory • audit • operator

master plan • finmodel • digital twin

first stage: park • sport • knowledge • ecology

Campus • Rehabilitation • Tourism • Laboratories

Urban infrastructure around the core

Russian Network + International License

The main principle of the pilot: first measurable effect on one territory, then scaling.

14. KPI: the park must prove the result

Assessment simultaneously on ecology, people, knowledge, economics and management

ENVIRONMENT

SOCIETY

HEALTH

KNOWLEDGE

Air • Water • Biodiversity

attendance • repeat visits

activity • rehabilitation

Program • Research • Startups

ECONOMY

TOURISM

EFFICIENCY

MASSHTAB

investments • turnover • jobs

guests • overnights • event stream

resources • operation • reaction

Certified Parks • regions

PARK → CITY OF KNOWLEDGE → NETWORK

The park becomes the first physical module.

EQUILIBRIUM is a digital nervous system.

Superclass - the contour of human development.

The City of Knowledge is the spatial form of the new economy.

PILOT IN RUSSIA → REGION NETWORKS → INTERNATIONAL LICENSE

Strategic platform for territorial development EQUILIBRIUM

Published files

Infrastructure · Full published text

Evolution of Standards and Benchmarks in Russia’s Construction Sector

Source Status: Primary Document

A proposal for developing standards, benchmarks and digital connectivity in the construction industry.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/evolyutsiya-standartov-stroikompleksa

Open on the site

Normative-methodical support

ISO/IEC 17029 • ISO/IEC 17025 • ISO 14721:2025 OAIS • PREMIS • W3C PROV-O • NIST AI RMF / TEVV

Prepared for the Heritage Preservation Archive ecosystem and Academic Registers

August 2026

01

Summary of the decision

The new management unit is not a file or a record, but a verifiable statement with a history of origin.

What is changing

  • The standard becomes a machine-readable set of requirements, not just the text of the document.
  • The standard becomes a testable digital model: measuring, spatial, project, archival or algorithmic.
  • The conclusion is related to the source data, method, executor, time and scope of applicability.
  • AI gets the right to offer and verify, but a legally significant decision remains with the authorized person.

Proposed outcome

Create an intersystem "Contour of digital trust of the construction complex" - an add-on of rules and connections that does not replace the existing GIS. It specifies passports, API-contracts, the graph of origin and the mechanism for re-checking.

02

The Seven Stages of Evolution

Scale S0-S6 shows how much the standard is able to manage the real life cycle of the object.

LevelForm of StandardWhat can be provedKey limitation
S0Paper TextExistence of an approved normno machine processing
S1Electronic documentfile version and signatureRequirements remain within the text
S2Register of Requirementsrelevance and scopeweak connection with objects
S3Related ReferenceComparability of data between systemsThe origin is not always preserved.
S4Proof CountWho, what and on what basis has confirmedSingle IDs are required
S5Controlledautomatic verification of formal criteriaAutomation is not a substitute for judgement
S6Adaptive standardMonitoring, reviewing and learning from eventsRequires management of AI and versions

03

Standard, standard and proof

The three entities must be kept separate, but linked.

EntityDefinition in digital circuitMinimum passport
Standardapproved rule, criterion or procedureID, version, status, area, owner, date of action
Referencereference implementation or value for comparisontype, unit, uncertainty, method, environment, version
EvidenceRecord confirming the fulfillment of criterionsource, time, signature, hash, method of receipt, rights
Approvalspecific testable thesis about the objectobject, purpose, criterion, time, risk
DecisionApproval status after evaluationstatus, conditions, responsible person, grounds, term of revision

Types of digital standards

  • regulatory - formalized requirement;
  • measuring - value with traceability and uncertainty;
  • information - data structure, directory, classifier;
  • spatial - coordinate and geometric basis;
  • project - approved information model of the object;
  • archival - a package of preservation and history of events;
  • algorithmic - control set and expected model results.

04

Unified digital contour of the construction complex

Systems perform different functions; trust arises in the connections between them.

SystemMain FunctionRole in the evidence chain
EGISOGD "Stroycomplex.RF"Federal Sectoral Environment and Integrationrouting of information, requirements, services and statuses
Regional GISOGDSubject's urban dataterritorial context, documents and restrictions
ICUPproject management of state customersplans, terms, cost, models, execution events
EGRZthe Register of Expertise Conclusionsversion of the project, conclusion and grounds of examination
FGIS CSPricing in Constructioncost data, indices and resource positions
EWISSHousing dataobjects, developers, disclosure and analytics
NSPDA single spatial basiscoordinates, boundaries, layers, identification of the territory
GIS TOR KNDAutomation of control and supervisioninspections, prevention, evidence, prescriptions
E-government servicesEntry and exit of legally significant proceduresapplication, consent, decision, notification, appeal

Note: System names and functional boundaries are evolving. The document uses the architectural role as of August 2026.

05

Construction complex.RF and regional GISOGD

The federal and regional levels should form one evidence vertical.

Federal level

  • common API and rules of intersystem exchange;
  • register of requirements and documents with versionability;
  • through identifier of the capital construction object;
  • Superservice "Digital construction" and monitoring of the industry.

Regional level

  • territorial planning, zoning and planning documentation;
  • permissions, notifications, restrictions and information about objects;
  • Regional coordination processes and communication with municipalities;
  • prompt updating of data on the life cycle of the object.

06

ISUP of state customers

The project system transforms the plan and information model into a continuous execution journal.

Control areaEnroll in ISUPExternal proof
Volumestructure of work and version of the taskRequirement from the Registry
Timeframebaseline schedule and actual eventssigned document / journal
Costlimits, contract, changesPositions and indices of FGIS CS
ProjectInformation Model and ConflictsEGRZ
TerritoryCoordinates and LimitationsNSPD / GISOGD
Monitoringrisks, comments, eliminationGIS TOR KND

07

EGRZ: standard of expert solution

The conclusion should be related not only to the object, but also to the exact version of the materials tested.

Evidence-based communication

  1. Object ID → Application ID → version of project documentation;
  2. composition of engineering surveys → applied requirements;
  3. comments → responses → changes → recheck;
  4. conclusion → signatories → date → scope;
  5. subsequent modification of project → trigger update.

08

FGIS CS: cost standard

Price becomes evident when the source, period, territory, resource and method of calculation are visible.

ComponentTraceability requirement
Resourcesingle code, name, characteristics, unit of measurement
Price sourcesupplier or surveillance, period, territory, conditions
Indexmethodology, basis, date of publication and scope
Estimatesversion of the regulatory framework, coefficients, assumptions
Changecause, initiator, impact on cost and timing

Connections

FGIS CS ↔ ISUP: planned and actual cost. FGIS CS ↔ EGRZ: the estimated part being checked. FGIS CS ↔ register of requirements: current methodology and scope.

09

EHRN: public object status reference

These disclosures should be comparable to project, expert, and spatial information.

  • common identity of the developer and the object;
  • communication of the project declaration with the version of project solutions;
  • monitoring of deadlines and actual readiness;
  • consistency of address, coordinates and cadastral information;
  • fixing the source of each public characteristic;
  • machine-readable history of corrections and notifications.

10

NSPD: Spatial reference

A single coordinate basis connects the object, territory, restrictions, rights and services.

LayerWhich confirmsMonitoring
BoundariesLocation of the site and objectcoordinate system, accuracy, date
Rightslegal regime and subject of lawsource EGRN, relevance
LimitationsAreas with special conditions of usebase, geometry, term
PlanningAcceptable and Planned Usedocument, version, approval
InfrastructureConnectivity of the object with networks and territoriesdata owner, completeness

11

GIS TOR KND and electronic services

Control and service become events of a single life cycle of the object.

GIS TOR KND

Fixes preventive and control measures, risk bases, evidence, prescriptions and elimination results. Digital verification materials must be associated with the object, inspector, time, technical means and immutable journal.

E-government services

Provide legally significant entry and exit: application, set of documents, interagency requests, decision, notification and appeal. The service interface should not hide the origin of the data and the decision criteria.

12

International standards as technological roles

Standards do not replace Russian law; they provide neutral models of competence, origin, and preservation.

BaseRole in the circuitPractical object
ISO/IEC 17029Validation/verification of allegations, competence and impartialityConclusion on suitability or truth
ISO/IEC 17025Competence of testing and calibration laboratoriesMeasurement Protocol and Uncertainty
ISO 14721:2025 OAISResponsibility and Functions of the Long-Term ArchiveReception, storage and distribution packages
PREMISobjects, events, agents and conservation rightsFile history and actions with it
W3C PROV-OIntersystem description of originEntity-Activity-Agent and derivative relationships
NIST AI RMFRisk management AIGovern–Map–Measure–Manage
NIST TEVVTesting, evaluation, verification and validation AIControl scenarios and results

Important: NIST AI RMF — voluntary framework, and TEVV-Athlon August 2026 Published as an initial draft for discussion.

13

Graph of origin: Entity — Activity — Agent

W3C PROV-O allows you to link records of different systems without losing their independence.

ClassExample in the construction complexKey connections
Entityrequirement, model, estimate, conclusion, photo, solutionwas created, revised, derived
Activityresearch, examination, calculation, verification, migrationused the essence, gave rise to a new
Agentorganization, expert, laboratory, information systemperformed the action, has a role and responsibility

Minimal relationships

  • "the conclusion was formed by the activities of the expert";
  • "The examination used a version of the project model";
  • “the project model has been revised on the basis of a comment”;
  • “the decision was attributed to the authorized person”;
  • "archive package is a representation of a digital object."

14

Passport of digital standard

Each requirement receives an address, history and terms of use.

BlockFields
IdentitySTD-ID, name, class, owner
Legal statusreason, obligation, jurisdiction
Versionrevision, date of action, predecessor
Areaobjects, processes, exceptions
Formalizationcriterion, unit, tolerance
Method of verificationVAL-code, data, tool, competence
Resultstatuses, conditions, validity period
Connectionsdocuments, registers, classifiers, API
RisksConsequences of Error and Level of Evidence
Revisiontriggers, periodicity, history of decisions

15

Digital Proof Package

The unit of exchange between the systems must be self-sufficient for verification and archival storage.

Package contentsContents
ManifestList of Files and Structured Records
Fixitychecksums and algorithms
Contextobject, approval, purpose and applicable requirements
OriginEntity-Activity-Agent, Time, Versions
Methodprocedure, equipment, software, parameters
Competenceorganization, role, certificate/area
Rightsprocessing basis, access, restrictions
Decisionstatus, conditions, signature, term
SavingOAIS-package and PREMIS-events

16

Validation AI in the state circuit

Automation is permissible only together with proven boundaries and a stop mechanism.

Function NIST AI RMFWhat to fix in the construction complex
Governowner, policy, powers, prohibitions, liability
Mapscenario, affected persons, data, environment and consequences
Measuremetrics, control sets, errors, stability, offsets
Managedecision on application, restrictions, monitoring, incidents

TEVV for model

  • testing - observed behavior on given data;
  • evaluation - interpretation of the result relative to the purpose and risk;
  • verification - whether the system meets the specification;
  • Validation - whether the system is suitable for a real scenario;
  • Post-control - whether the quality is maintained after updates and drift.

17

Targeted architecture of trust

Not a new megasystem, but a coherent layer of identifiers, events, and rules.

LayerFunctionResult
1. Law and standardsRequirements and Classifiers RegisterCurrent Norm
2. Master Dataobjects, persons, organizations, territoriesA single identity
3. Industry GISauthoritative data on functionsPrimary Records
4. OriginPROV-graph and PREMIS-eventsTraceability
5. ValidationISO 17029/17025, VAL, locksJustified status
6. ArchiveOAIS-packages and recoveryLong-term Evidence
7. AIRMF/TEVV and monitoringControlled Automation
8. ServicesAPI and electronic servicessolution for citizen and organization

18

Road map for 24 months

The transition starts with three cross-cutting cases, not total integration.

PeriodWorkResult
0–3 monthsowners, terminology, ID, list of systemsarchitectural regulations
4–6 monthspassport standards and evidence, API-profilesminimum data set
7–12 months3 pilots: examination, cost, supervisionthrough tracing
13–18 monthsPROV/PREMIS, archive packages, revalidationThe Proof Count
19–24 monthsAI-TEVV, independent evaluation, scalingDecision on industrial contour

Pilot indicators

  • 100% decisions have references to exact versions of the evidence;
  • at least 90% requirements have owner, status and scope;
  • discrepancies in the identity of the object are identified before a legally significant decision;
  • every update AI Regression TEVV;
  • the archive package is restored in the control test.

19

Registers of first launch

The minimum set provides manageability without overloading the architecture.

CodeRegisterUnit of account
REG-STDstandards and requirementsSTD-ID and version
REG-REFstandards and reference booksREF-ID
REG-OBJCapital construction objectsOBJ-ID
REG-EVDevidenceEVD-ID and hash
REG-DECDecisions and statusesDEC-ID
REG-AGTAgents and CompetencesAGT-ID
REG-EVTLife Cycle EventsEVT-ID
REG-AImodels and sets TEVVAI-ID / DATA-ID
REG-LNKintersystem communicationsType of communication and source

20

Sources and status of the document

Architectural proposals are separate from existing standards and state systems.

1. The RF Government. Strategic direction of digital transformation of construction and housing and utilities 2030 Year, by order of 02.03.2026 № 398-r. https://government.ru/docs/all/163630/

2. GIS EGRZ. About the register. https://egrz.ru/organisation/about-egrz

3. Rosreestr. National Spatial Data System. https://nspd.gov.ru/

4. ISO/IEC 17029:2019. Validation and verification bodies. https://www.iso.org/standard/29352.html

5. ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Testing and calibration laboratories. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html

6. ISO 14721:2025. OAIS reference model. https://www.iso.org/standard/87471.html

7. Library of Congress. PREMIS. https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/index.html

8. W3C Recommendation. PROV-O. https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/

9. NIST. AI Risk Management Framework. https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework

10. NIST. TEVV-Athlon Framework, initial public draft, 2026. https://www.nist.gov/artificial-intelligence/ai-research/tevv-athlon-framework-evaluating-ai-systems

Other published edition: Evolution of standards and standards Evolution_standards_and_standards_Building complex_RF.pptx · web text +

Related registries, digital evidence and verifiable solutions AI

NORMA

→ REQUIREMENT

→ PROOF

→ SOLUTION

→ REVIEW

EGYSOGD • GISOGD • ICUP • EGRZ • FGIS CS • EWISS • NSPD • GIS TOR KND

The standard goes through seven stages of maturity

SCALE S0-S6

PAPER

ELECTRONIC

REGISTER

RELATED

EXPLANATORY

EXECUTED

ADAPTIVE

text

file and signature

ID and version

Intersystem Reference

graph of origin

autocheck

Monitoring and revision

GOAL 2030: S4-S5

Proof graph + automated checks. S6 - only with fixed powers and human control.

Data sharing does not create trust

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

Systems can transmit the same record — and still diverge in version, source, and meaning.

IDENTITY

Versions

ORIGIN

one object gets different numbers

The conclusion refers to the old project

The public figure does not lead to the source

COMPETENCE

DURATION

It is not clear who can confirm

decision continues after change

Automatic withdrawal has no limits

The new management unit is a verifiable statement with a history of origin.

Nine systems form one life cycle

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

BUILDINGS.RF

GISOGD

ICUP

Federal Integration

The Territorial Context

Project and execution

EGRZ

FGIS CS

EWISS

expert solution

cost standard

Public Status

NSPD

GIS TOR KND

SERVICES

spatial basis

control and supervision

Legally significant entry/exit

Trust arises in relationships: object ID • version • source • solution • revision event

Construction complex.RF connects the federal and regional levels

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

FEDERAL CONTOUR

REGIONAL GISOGD

API • Register of Requirements • through object ID • Services and industry monitoring

territorial planning • restrictions • permissions • municipal processes

RULE OF INTEGRATION

The federal outline stores identifiers, key statuses, and references to authoritative sources. The region remains the owner of the primary record.

The trust should not create a parallel copy of the state.

ISUP turns the project into a journal of evidence

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

VOLMU

Structure of works

Register of Requirements

DURATION

schedule and events

Signed Journal

COSTS

Limits and changes

FGIS CS

PROJECT

Information Model

EGRZ

TERRITORY

Coordinates and Limitations

NSPD / GISOGD

CONTROL

Risks and elimination

GIS TOR KND

Project reference = exact version of the model + Signatures + composition of files + quality criteria + Relationship to Conclusion.

EGRZ should fix the exact version of the verified project

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

OBJ-ID

REQ-ID

MODEL-V

EVD-ID

DEC-ID

object

Statement

Project Version

Surveys and answers

Conclusion

RISK OF DISCOVERING VERSIONS

A positive opinion for one version of the project does not confirm subsequent changes. The mismatch must block the permit or the start of work.

The recheck trigger is created automatically when the project changes.

FGIS CS makes the cost verifiable

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

RESOURCE

code • properties • units

COST STANDARD

PRICE SOURCE

supplier • period • territory

Source

+ period

+ territory

+ resource

+ method

INDEX

technique • basis • area

SMETA

base version • coefficients

CHANGE

Cause • Initiator • Impact

Connections: FGIS CS ↔ ISUP ↔ USRZ ↔ requirements register

EHRN becomes a public benchmark for the state of the facility

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

The open feature should lead to the primary source and the date of relevance.

IDENTITY

Versions

DURATION

developer and facility

Project Declaration ↔ Project

planned and actual readiness

SPACE

SOURCE

HISTORY

address ↔ coordinates ↔ cadastre

The basis of each characteristic

corrections and notifications

Openness without data origin turns into a showcase without a verifiable basis.

NSP sets a spatial standard

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

BORDERS

location

coordinates • accuracy • date

RIGHTS

legal regime

source • relevance

RESTRICTIONS

Use areas

Base • Geometry • Term

PLANNING

Permissible development

Document • version • approval

INFRASTRUCTURE

Connectivity of the territory

owner • completeness

A coordinate without metadata of accuracy and origin is not a reference.

Control and public service become events of the same cycle

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

STATEMENT

AUTOVERPISE

INTER-AGENCY DATA

EXPERTISE

User

Requirements

authoritative sources

Competent person

DECISION

OVERSIGHT

ARCHIVE

REVIEW

status and conditions

evidence

package and events

object change

GIS TOR KND records the basis of risk, measure, evidence, prescription and elimination.

Each international standard is responsible for its own layer.

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

ISO/IEC 17029

Approval and decision

ROLE

ISO/IEC 17025

Measurement and Competence

not to replace Russian law, but to give a neutral model of verification, origin and preservation

OAIS

Long term archive

PREMIS

Save Events

W3C PROV-O

Origin of data

NIST AI RMF

Risks AI

NIST TEVV

Testing and evaluation AI

NIST AI RMF is a voluntary framework; TEVV-Athlon was published as an initial draft in 2026.

The graph of origin connects systems without merging them.

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

ENTITY

ACTIVITY

AGENT

model • estimate • conclusion • photos

prospecting • calculation • examination • verification

Organization • Expert • Laboratory • GIS

The conclusion was created by the activity of examination using the exact version of the model and attributed to the authorized agent.

Digital passport contains 10 blocks

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

ID and owner

Legal status

Version and Dates

scope of application

criterion and tolerance

Method VAL

Status of decision

Communications and API

Risk of Error

Review triggers

STD-ID is retained during editorial change; the semantic norm receives a new version or ID.

The evidence package restores the course of the decision

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

MANIFEST

FIXITY

CONTACTS

Composition

Integrity

object and purpose

ORIGIN

METHOD

COMPETENCE

agents and versions

Procedure and Software

Role and Area

RIGHTS

DECISION

CONSERVATION

Access and Restrictions

status and term

OAIS + PREMIS

The independent reviewer must restore the decision without access to informal correspondence and the memory of the participants.

AI passes risk management and TEVV

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

GOVERN

MAP

MEASURE

MANAGE

Powers and Prohibitions

scenario and consequences

metrics and errors

solution and monitoring

TEVV

Behavior Testing

assessment of the objective

Specification Verification

Validation of the real scenario

Post-control updates

PROHIBITED HOUSE

AI does not issue a legally significant opinion and does not change the canonical record without a legal basis and a responsible person.

Target architecture - eight agreed layers

ARCHITECTURE OF TRUST

LAW AND STANDARDS

MASTER DATA

INDUSTRIAL GIS

ORIGIN

Current Norm

A single identity

Primary Records

Traceability

VALIDATION

ARCHIVE

SERVICES

Justified status

Long-term Evidence

Controlled Automation

solution for the user

Authoritative source owns the record; the trust layer stores connections, quality statuses, and evidence.

Launch starts with three cross-cutting cases

ROAD MAP 24 MONTH

7–12

13–18

19–24

RULES

PASPORT

3 PILOT

GRAF

MASSHTAB

owners • ID • terminology

Standard • Proof • API

examination • cost • supervision

PROV • PREMIS • archive

AI-TEVV • independent evaluation

REG-STD

REG-OBJ

REG-EVD

REG-DEC

REG-EVT

REG-AI

Requirements

objects

evidence

Solutions

Events

Model TEVV

Approve: Registry owner • authority matrix • critical gateways • three pilot objects

Sources cited in presentation 26

  • Interior architectural concept, 2026.
  • Internal scale S0-S6. The project model, not the state standard.
  • Government of the Russian Federation, Order of 02.03.2026 № 398-r: https://government.ru/docs/all/163630/
  • Government of the Russian Federation, strategy of digital transformation of construction and housing and communal services up to 2030: https://government.ru/docs/all/163630/
  • GIS EGRP: https://egrz.ru/organisation/about-egrz
  • NSPD: https://nspd.gov.ru/
  • Internal design reference model, 2026.
  • GIS EGRZ, system purpose: https://egrz.ru/organisation/about-egrz
  • Internal model of version traceability, 2026.
  • FGIS CS: https://fgiscs.minstroyrf.ru/
  • ESS: https://наш.дом.рф/
  • Rosreestr, NSPD: https://nspd.gov.ru/
  • Government of the Russian Federation, digitalization of control and supervisory activities: https://government.ru/news/58093/
  • ISO/IEC 17029:2019: https://www.iso.org/standard/29352.html
  • ISO/IEC 17025:2017: https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html
  • ISO 14721:2025 OAIS: https://www.iso.org/standard/87471.html
  • PREMIS: https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/index.html
  • W3C PROV-O: https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
  • NIST AI RMF: https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
  • NIST TEVV-Athlon: https://www.nist.gov/artificial-intelligence/ai-research/tevv-athlon-framework-evaluating-ai-systems
  • Internal form of digital standard passport, 2026.
  • NIST AI RMF 1.0: https://www.nist.gov/publications/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework-ai-rmf-10
  • NIST AI RMF Playbook: https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework/nist-ai-rmf-playbook
  • NIST TEVV-Athlon, initial public draft, 2026: https://www.nist.gov/artificial-intelligence/ai-research/tevv-athlon-framework-evaluating-ai-systems
  • Internal target architecture, 2026.
  • Internal roadmap and registers of the first launch, 2026.

Published files

Projects · Full published text

“Towards Time”: A Cultural Programme in China

Source Status: Primary Document

A proposal for the Towards Time cultural programme in Chinese cities: historical photographic documents, exhibitions, publishing and related events. Plans and scale are presented as claims made in the source document.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/navstrechu-vremeni-kitay

Open on the site

International Intergovernmental Organization “International Research Institute for Management Problems” expresses its respect and reports on the preparations for implementation of the 2026 – 2027 years in the PRC rental cultural program "Towards Time" (hereinafter - the program).

For the first time, a large-scale exhibition programme is planned to run simultaneously in 8 Chinese cities—Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Harbin, Wuhan, Chongqing and Tianjin—with a combined population of more than 132 million. The exhibition period is 90 days, with an exhibition area of 12,000 sq. m. in each city. Total projected attendance is more than 20 million people.

The program is based on authentic historical photo documents about China of the late XIX century, obtained during the Russian expedition of scientists in 1874-1875 from St. Petersburg to China along the stretches of the Great Silk Road and consists of an exhibition, publishing, advertising, scientific, souvenir, musical, additional programs, a rally and an auction. A special place is occupied by events related to the presentation and implementation of the album "China in photos of Russian travelers of the second half of the XIX century."

Gift copies are planned: one will be offered as a gift from V. V. Putin to Xi Jinping, and one will be sold at auction in Hong Kong. The album is a numbered edition, published simultaneously in three languages—Russian, Chinese and English—with a total print run of 600,000 copies, in A4+ format.

The program was highly appreciated by Russian President Vladimir Putin and Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia Rus. They both wrote greetings on the album.

A promotional catalogue featuring 8-10 companies from Russia, China, Mongolia and Kazakhstan—the countries through which the expedition passed—and several BRICS countries is planned as part of the same package as the album, with a print run of 600,000 copies in Russian, Chinese and English.

Thus, historical photos of the Silk Road (the first album) and information about modern companies will be combined in the framework of Xi Jinping’s project “One Belt, One Road” (the second album). The promotional space in this album can be sold at a special price.

To implement the programme, two new joint-stock companies are to be registered in Russia and Hong Kong. No Russian or Chinese budget funds are to be used. Funding of $30,000,000, in roubles and yuan, is required; the funds will be used to prepare and implement the programme in Russia and China. Repayment is to come from entrance tickets, the album, an auction, the advertising campaign, souvenirs and publications, and additional programmes. The funds are needed for a period of 13 months.

The proceeds are received by a Hong Kong company and distribute the income after full payment of taxes.

30% receives a financial partner (investor).

Projected returns from just the two main items—tickets and publications—are more than $200,000,000.

The program is highly profitable, open, and quickly recouped.

We invite you to consider the possibility of your participation in the program "Towards Time" as a financial partner (investor).

Other published edition: Primary document Project in China 01.07.2026.docx · Web Text +

The International Intergovernmental Organization “International Research Institute for Advanced Systems” expresses its respect and informs about the preparations made for the implementation of the cultural program “Towards Time” (hereinafter referred to as the program) in the PRC in 2026-2027.

For the first time, it is planned to implement a large-scale rental of the exhibition program simultaneously in 8 cities of China (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Harbin, Wuhan, Chongqing, Tangjin), which together have a population of more than 132 million people. The exhibition period is 90 days, the exhibition area is 12,000 square meters in each city. The planned total attendance is more than 20 million people.

The program is based on authentic historical photographic documents about China at the end of the 19th century, obtained during the Russian expedition of scientists in 1874-1875 from St. Petersburg to China along the Great Silk Road and consists of exhibitions, publishing, advertising, scientific, souvenir, music, additional programs, a car rally and an auction. A special place is occupied by events related to the presentation and implementation of the album “China in photographs of Russian travelers of the second half of the 19th century”.

It is planned to publish gift copies: one will be offered as a gift from Vladimir Putin to Xi Jinping, one will be sold at auction in Hong Kong. The album is numbered, published in three languages simultaneously (Russian, Chinese, English) with a total circulation of 600,000 copies, A4+ format.

The program was highly appreciated by Russian President Vladimir Putin and Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia. Both wrote greetings in the album.

In one block with the album, an image catalog is planned about 8-10 companies from Russia, China, Mongolia, Kazakhstan (the countries through which the expedition took place) and a number of BRICS countries, with a circulation of 600,000 copies (Russian, Chinese, English).

Thus, historical photographs of the Silk Road (the first album) and information about modern companies within the framework of Xi Jinping's “One Belt, One Road” project (the second album) will be combined. The advertising space in this album can be sold at a special price.

To implement the program, two new joint-stock companies are being registered in Russia and Hong Kong. Budgetary funds from Russia and China didn’t involve. The program requires financing in the amount of $ 30,000,000 (in rubles, yuan), the funds will be used for the preparation and implementation of the program in Russia and China. The refund is due to the sale of entrance tickets, an album, an auction, an advertising campaign, souvenir and publishing products, and additional programs. The funds are required for a period of 13 months.

The Hong Kong company receives the proceeds and distributes the income after full payment of taxes.

The financial partner (investor) receives 30%.

The planned profitability for only two main items (tickets and publishing products) is more than $ 200,000,000.

The program is highly profitable, open, and fast-paying.

We suggest that you consider the possibility of your participation in the “Towards Time” program as a financial partner (investor).

Published files

Projects · Full published text

State Programme “FIRE”

Source Status: Primary Document

The project describes a system of socially useful action, voluntary participation and knowledge transfer.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/gosudarstvennaya-programma-ogon

Open on the site

transfer of knowledge and measurable social outcomes

CONCEPTUAL PROJECT FOR DISCUSSION AND PILOT

Editorial Board 1.0 • 24 August 2026

1. Status of the document

This material is a draft concept of the state program of the Russian Federation "FIRE" and is not a normative legal act approved by the state program or the official position of the state authority. The document is intended for pre-project discussion, pilot formation and subsequent legal, financial and organizational study.

2. Brief summary

"FIRE" is a voluntary state-public system that transfers socially useful initiatives, mentoring, assistance, environmental and cultural practices from disparate shares into a measurable cycle: task → action → confirmation of the result → transfer of experience → scaling.

In the digital outline, "Fire" is proposed to be used not as money and not as a mandatory rating of citizens, but as an untransferable and non-purchaseable sign of confirmed participation in specific programs and projects.

The program is focused on strengthening existing mechanisms of volunteering, education, social service, local initiatives, project activities and public-public partnership, and not on replacing them.

3. Passport of the program

ParameterContents
NameState program of the Russian Federation "FIRE"
StatusConceptual project for piloting
MissionTurning knowledge, memory, responsibility, and civic initiative into voluntary, validated actions with measurable societal outcomes.
HorizonPilot 2027–2028; scaling 2029–2032; evaluation and adjustment at the end of each stage.
Proposed CuratorDetermined by the Government of the Russian Federation in the prescribed manner.
Proposed Executive OfficerIt is determined after interdepartmental study; an interdepartmental model with the participation of relevant federal executive bodies is possible.
ParticipantsFederal and regional authorities, municipalities, educational and scientific organizations, NGOs, voluntary associations, business, cultural institutions, citizens.
Task forcesCitizens, youth, mentors, volunteers, families, local communities, socially oriented NGOs, employers.
Key Digital OutlinePlatform "FIRE": tasks, proof of result, verification, map of initiatives, analytics, API-integration.
The main principleVoluntary, non-discrimination, data minimization, confirmation of the result, transparency of the rules.

4. Strategic priorities

Transition from participation to result: Support initiatives where the result can be described, verified and repeated.

Knowledge Relay: Each successful action is accompanied by the transfer of a method, skill, or instruction to the next participant.

Intergenerational Connection: Memory, cultural heritage and social solidarity are translated into modern practices of service and mentoring.

Digital evidence: Events and results are recorded with minimal data, without excessive surveillance of citizens.

Scaling the best: Proven practices receive a replication mechanism between territories, institutions, and communities.

5. The problem the program is responding to

  • fragmentation of volunteer, educational, cultural and local initiatives;
  • the prevalence of quantitative reporting over evidence of real effect;
  • weak transfer of successful practices between communities and territories;
  • insufficient combination of civic initiative, mentoring and project economy;
  • The lack of a convenient mechanism to see not only the fact of participation, but also the result, reproducibility and further transfer of experience.

6. Objectives and objectives of the programme

Purpose: to create a national voluntary outline of socially useful action, in which the citizen, organization and territory can initiate, perform, confirm and transmit practices that have a measurable social effect.

  1. to form a single standard of the life cycle of a socially useful event;
  2. create a secure digital infrastructure for fixing and verifying results;
  3. develop a network of mentors and coordinators of the "Rest of Fire";
  4. create a calendar of 365 events and thematic cycles for territories and organizations;
  5. ensure integration with educational, cultural, environmental and social programs;
  6. introduce a system of independent evaluation of effectiveness and antifraud;
  7. to form a mechanism for scaling best practices and interregional exchange.

7. Principles of the program

Voluntary participation of a citizen cannot be a condition for access to basic rights, public services, medical care, education or social protection.

Non-discrimination. participation rates are not used as a universal social rating and do not serve as a basis for automatic restriction of rights.

Irreversibility of the sign of fire. sign of participation can not be bought, sold, exchanged for money or transferred to another person.

Verifiability. accrual of the mark and accounting of the result are possible only by transparent verification rules.

Minimization of data: the system collects only the data necessary to perform a specific function.

Significant decisions about a controversial outcome, sanctions, or exclusion from the program are not made solely by the algorithm.

Openness of the methodology. criteria, indicators, verification rules and appeal procedures are published.

Federality. the general standard is combined with regional and municipal scenarios.

8. Five Program Fields

FieldPurposeExamples
FIREAction and responsibilityVolunteering, mentoring, help, leadership, action relays
WATERLife and Recoveryecology, environmental health, restorative practices, care of territories
AIRknowledge and communicationeducation, education, science, media literacy, transfer of skills
LANDWork and Heritagelocal projects, improvement, craft, culture, material heritage
EFIRcoordination and meaninginteragency synchronization, analytics, calendar of events, effects map

9. Protocol "Relay of Fire"

1. Challenge - formulates a specific socially useful task and the expected result.

2. Acceptance - the participant voluntarily chooses the task and confirms his readiness to perform it.

3. Action - work, help, training or other approved format is performed.

4. Proof - the minimum sufficient confirmation of the result is fixed.

5. Verification - the result is checked according to a previously known procedure.

6. Transfer - a participant transfers knowledge, instruction or invitation to the next participant.

7. Scaling - A successful case gets into the practice library and can be replicated.

10. Calendar "365 Events"

It is proposed to build an annual rhythm as 13 cycles for 28 days plus the Day of synchronization. This is not a mandatory calendar for every citizen, but a constructor for institutions, regions, communities and voluntary teams.

№CycleFocusExample of result
1The AwakeningFirst ActionFirst confirmed case
2DisciplineRegularityseries of actions
3KnowledgelearningTransferred skill
4PracticeApplicationsolved problem
5MinistryPublic useAssistance to the recipient
6ConnectionsCo-operationCreated team
7CreationdraftNew practice
8StrengtheningSustainabilityRepeated process
9TransmissionMentoringNew carrier of practice
10ScalePropagationnew territory
11QualityimprovementIncreased effect
12SynchronizationagreementInteragency Communication
13ReturnReflectionUpdated Standard

11. Special cycle "Fire. The Second Breath »

A special socio-cultural cycle can be used for memory projects, intergenerational communication and volunteer assistance. Its central formula is: “Memory lives while we act.”

  • Helping veterans, seniors and families in need of support
  • restoration and care of objects of memory and local cultural spaces;
  • recording of family histories and oral memory with the consent of the participants;
  • mentoring between generations;
  • Volunteering to preserve historical memory.

When using symbols, including the St. George ribbon, a separate regulation of correct and respectful application is necessary, excluding commercialization and formal "accrual points for the symbol".

12. Digital sign "FIRE"

The program offers a non-payment digital sign of participation. It confirms the passage of a specific verified cycle and stores a reference to the type of action, date, method of confirmation and context of the project.

PermittedNot allowed
• confirm participation in the voluntary program• Sell or exchange for money
• to form a portfolio of practices• use as mandatory citizen rating
• to be used for selection to voluntary project teams• Automatically restrict basic rights or services
• show a history of mentoring and knowledge transfer• use hidden algorithms for sanctions without appeal procedure

13. Digital platform

Personal account: voluntary profile, assignments, evidence, history of participation

Task catalogue: social, educational, environmental, cultural and project tasks

Verification: rules of evidence, confirmation by the organizer, random check

Library of Practice: Successful Cases, Instructions, Templates, and Techniques

Map of initiatives: an aggregated representation of the activity of territories without disclosing unnecessary personal data

Analytics: KPI programs, effect, dynamics, quality, risks

Antifraud: identification of duplicates, anomalies and suspicious patterns with mandatory manual verification of disputed cases

API: integration with the systems of organizers and state information resources only if there is a legal basis

14. Management system

The management architecture must comply with the current management system of the state programs of the Russian Federation. The project offers the following roles:

The program curator is strategic coordination at the level of the Government of the Russian Federation.

Responsible executor - organization of implementation, indicators, budget, reporting.

Project Committee - interagency coordination and resolution of controversial issues.

Federal operator - methodology, digital platform, register of practices, support of regions.

Regional operator - pilots, partners, verification and local analytics.

Social and expert council - ethics, transparency, protection of the rights of participants, independent evaluation.

15. Proposed programme structure

ProjectContents
FP-1 "Relay of Fire"national standard of action, mentoring and calendar of events
FP-2 "Fire of Knowledge"schools, colleges, universities, additional education, mentors
FP-3 "Fire of Service"Social Volunteering and Local Communities
FP-4 "Fire of Heritage"culture, memory, family and territorial practices
FP-5 "Fire of the Earth"ecology, improvement, restoration of the environment
FP-6 "Fire Cooperation"business, NPOs, project tasks and partnership
FP-7 "Digital Fire"platform, data, antifraud, analytics, security
FP-8 "Effect Laboratory"evaluation of results, research, audit, replication

16. System of indicators

IndicatorMeaningType
Percentage of completed tasks% of tasks accepted by participantseffectiveness
Percentage of results verified% of results verifiedeffectiveness
Transfer ratiopercentage of cases for which instruction, mentoring or repetition is createdScaling
Repeatability of practicesNumber of practices successfully replicated in at least two territoriesScaling
Social impactmeasurable result by type of project: recipients of assistance, restored facilities, trained participants, etc.effect
Cost of resultProgram costs per unit of confirmed effectefficiency
Level of confidence of participantsSurvey metrics and percentage of decisions appealedTrust
Data qualityProportion of records that meet the requirements of completeness and evidenceQuality
Percentage of contested decisions reviewed after appealQuality Control Verification and AlgorithmsQuality

17. Financial model

Financial support should be formed only after the development of the passport program, the composition of projects, the calculation of measures and budgetary powers. At the conceptual stage, a three-level model is proposed:

Federal outline: methodology, basic platform, federal competitions and interregional projects.

Regional contour: co-financing of pilots, operators, infrastructure and local programs.

Extra-budgetary contour: voluntary co-financing of businesses, funds and partners under transparent agreements without buying fire signs.

The document deliberately does not include unconfirmed amounts of funding. The budget should be calculated based on the activities and results of the pilot.

18. Road map of piloting

StageTimeframeResult
Stage 0. Pre-project studyIII–IV sq. 2026legal model, methodology, participants, pilot design
Stage 1. Technical prototypeI-II apt. 2027MVP platforms, 3–5 task types, 500–1 000 participants
Stage 2. Regional PilotII-IV sq. 20271–3 regions, 5 000–20 000 participants, independent evaluation
Stage 3. Interregional expansion202810+ regions, single library of practices, integration
Stage 4. Scaling decisionEnd 2028assessment of efficiency, legal risks and economic feasibility
Stage 5. National outline2029–2032scaling only with a confirmed effect

19. Key risks and protection measures

Formalization and “race for points”: do not tie basic rights to participation metrics; measure result, not click count.

Cheating: selective verification, risk models, restrictions on repeated similar actions, human control.

Excessive data collection: privacy-by-design, data minimization, aggregated public statistics.

Discrimination: Banning universal social rankings and automatic sanctions.

Bureaucratization: minimum form set, single digital template and API.

Politicization of socially useful activity: clear neutral criteria for tasks and expert-public control.

Commercialization of the FIRE sign: legal prohibition of sale, transfer and monetary conversion.

20. Normative and methodological framework

When developing the official draft of the state program, it is necessary to take into account the current Regulation on the management system of state programs of the Russian Federation, approved by the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation from 26 May 2021 № 786, including requirements for strategic priorities, programme content and management system. As of August 2026 The resolution is in effect as amended 2026 years.

A separate legal study will require: personal data; information security; interagency exchange; rules for the participation of minors; grant and procurement mechanisms; verification procedure; appeals; use of symbols; the regime of intellectual rights to materials of the library of practices.

21. What it takes to launch a state pilot

1. approve the concept of the pilot and determine the federal coordinator;

2. to form an interdepartmental working group;

3. approve the methodology of a socially useful event and proof of the result;

4. choose 1–3 pilot regions and 3–5 thematic areas;

5. assess the impact on the rights of citizens and the protection of personal data;

6. create a minimum digital platform and an independent assessment outline;

7. based on 6–12 months to make a decision: stop, update or scale.

22. Final formula of the program

KNOWLEDGE → ACTIVITY → RESULT → TRANSFER → MASSTAB

Fire is not a person’s rating. This is evidence of a specific voluntary case.

23. Sources and benchmarks

  • the Government of the Russian Federation 26.05.2021 № 786 "On the management system of state programs of the Russian Federation" (the current edition of the August 2026 years).
  • Official publication of legal acts: publication of the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 786 from 26.05.2021.
  • Materials of the concept EQUILIBRIUM / "Relay of the Fire of Knowledge", developed within the framework of the current project.

Note: before the project is submitted to the official outline of the state program, interagency coordination, financial and economic justification, legal expertise, regulatory and social impact assessment, as well as pilot verification of indicators are necessary.

Other published edition: FIRE State_program_FIRE.pptx · web text +

System of socially useful action, voluntary participation and knowledge transfer

Conceptual project for discussion and piloting

KNOWLEDGE → ACTION → RESULTS
→ TRANSFER →

Editorial Board 1.0 • 24 August 2026

Mission of the program

From disparate initiatives to reproducible societal outcomes

"FIRE" - voluntary state-social system,
which turns the initiative into a verifiable cycle of action.

TASK

ACTION

PROOF

TRANSFER

MASSHTAB

A specific public challenge

Voluntary performance

minimum sufficient result

Knowledge and Mentoring

Replication of the best

Key: The programme reinforces existing mechanisms of volunteerism, education, culture, social and local initiatives - not replaces them.

Why a program is needed

Five gaps that prevent participation from becoming a sustainable effect

DISARMAMENT

REPORTING

TRANSFER

Initiatives are separate from each other

Quantity is often more important than proven effect

Successful practices are weakly moving between territories

COOPERATION

REPRODUCTIVENESS

weak mix of citizens, mentors, NGOs, business and government

lacks a unified standard of “done → demonstrated → passed on”

Red lines of program

FIRE is not money and not a mandatory social rating

WHAT IS AVAILABLE

What is not allowed

• Participation is exclusively voluntary

• The sign of fire cannot be bought, sold or transferred

• Participation is not related to access to basic rights and services

• Minimization of personal data

• Transparent methodology and right of appeal

• No universal citizen rating

• No automatic sanctions by algorithm

• No hidden profiling behavior

• No commercialization of memory symbols

• No "race for points" instead of real result

Five Program Fields

One architecture - different contours of socially useful action

FIRE

AIR

Action and responsibility
Volunteering • Mentoring • Assistance

Knowledge and communication
education • education • skills

FIRE

Single
Protocol

WATER

LAND

Life and Recovery
Ecology • Health Environment • Territories

Work and heritage
beautification • craft • culture

EFIR

Coordination and meaning
analytics • calendar • effects map

Protocol "Relay of Fire"

The Seven Stages of the Socially Useful Event Life Cycle

CHALLENGES

ACCEPTANCE

ACTION

PROOF

VERIFICATION

TRANSFER

MASSHTAB

Formulating the task

The participant chooses

Work in progress

Recorded result

Checking the rules

Transmit the method

We replicate the case

The standard makes the action reproducible: from a single act to a library of practices and interregional replication.

365 events - annual rhythm

13 Cycles × 28 days + Synchronization Day

The Awakening

Discipline

Knowledge

Practice

Ministry

Connections

Creation

Strengthening

Transmission

Scale

Quality

Synchronization

Return

365th day

This is a constructor for regions, institutions and voluntary teams - not a mandatory calendar for every citizen.

DAY
Synchronization

Special cycle "Fire. The Second Breath »

Memory, Intergenerational Communication and Volunteer Action

"Memory lives while we act"

• Assistance to veterans, elderly people and families

• Care of objects of memory and cultural spaces

• Recording of family histories with the consent of participants

• Mentoring between generations

• Volunteering for historical memory

SPECIAL REGULATION

When using symbols, including the St. George ribbon, respectful application is required, without commercialization and without “symbol points”.

Digital Program Outline

Fire sign + platform + proof + data protection

Member Account

Task Directory

Verification

Task • Evidence • Participation history

Social • Educational • Cultural • Environmental

Regulation • Confirmation • Sample Inspection

Library of Practice

Map of initiatives

Analytics and antifraud

Cases • Instructions • Templates

Aggregate activity of territories

KPI • Anomalies • Manual review of disputed cases

Privacy-by-design principle: the system collects only the data needed for a particular function.

Eight projects of the program

Federal architecture, which can be launched in stages

Relay of Fire

The Fire of Knowledge

Fire of Service

The Fire of Heritage

standard of action, mentoring, calendar

Education and mentors

Social Volunteering

Culture and Memory

Fire of the Earth

Fire of Cooperation

Digital Fire

Laboratory effect

ecology and improvement

business, NPOs and project tasks

platform, data, security

assessment, research, audit

Management system

Strategy from above - implementation through operators - control through public expertise

CURATOR - Strategic Coordination

RESPONSIBLE EXECUTOR — indicators • budget • reports

PROJECT COMMITTEE — interagency solutions

FEDERAL OPERATOR — methodology • platform • register of practices

REGIONAL OPERATOR — pilots • partners • verification

PUBLIC EXPERT COUNCIL — ethics • rights • independent assessment

How to measure the result

Indicators should measure effect and reproducibility, not clicks and symbolic scores

Completion

Verification

Transmission

Repeatability

Percentage of completed tasks

Percentage of results verified

Percentage of cases with instruction/mentoring

Practices Reproduced in Other Territories

Social impact

Cost of result

Trust

Data quality

beneficiaries, facilities, trained participants

Unit of Confirmed Effect

+ Percentage of decisions appealed

completeness, evidence, appeals

Road map 2026–2032

Scaling only after confirmed pilot effect

III–IV sq. 2026

Pre-project study

legal model • technique • pilot design

I-II apt. 2027

Technical prototype

MVP • 3–5 Task Types • 500–1 000 Participants

II-IV sq. 2027

Regional Pilot

1–3 Region • 5 000–20 000 Participants

2028

Interregional expansion

10+ regions • practice library • integration

End 2028

Scaling decision

Efficiency • Law • Economics

2029–2032

National outline

Only with a confirmed effect

What it takes to launch a pilot

Seven solutions translate the concept into a testable state experiment

• Approve the concept of pilot and coordinator

• Form an interdepartmental working group

• Adopt event methodology and proof of result

• Select 1–3 regions and 3–5 thematic areas

• Evaluate the impact on citizens' rights and personal data

• Create MVP platform and independent evaluation outline

• After 6–12 months: stop, modify or scale

FINAL FORMULA

KNOWLEDGE
↓
ACTION
↓
RESULT
↓
TRANSFER
↓
MASSHTAB

Fire is not a person’s rating.
This is evidence of a specific voluntary case.

STATE PROGRAMME "FIRE" • CONCEPTUAL PROJECT • 24.08.2026

Published files

Projects · Full published text

BRICS International Congress Centre

Source Status: Primary Document

A proposal for a BRICS international congress centre with infrastructure: proposed implementation participants and sites. Organisational and land-related information listed in the source is presented as content of the project document.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/brics-kongress-tsentr

Open on the site

Construction project

BRICS International Congress Center with Infrastructure

For the implementation of this project, a new legal entity was specially created - BRICS Development Joint Stock Company with a team of professionals. The Concept of BRICS Congress Center Development has been developed.

The project is implemented by the International Intergovernmental Organization "International Research Institute for Management Problems" (Prime Minister of the Russian Federation M.V. Mishustin appointed the Secretary General of the Union State S.Yu. Glazyev is a member of the Council of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation).

The following sites were selected for the implementation of the project in the Greater City area:

3 Privately owned property, and 2 the Department of the President of the Russian Federation (Autobase No 2 and FSUE "Product Supply Enterprise").

Cadastral numbers, areas and addresses of privately owned land plots:

- 77:09:0005016:114 (10,666 sq. m.), Moscow, 3-ya Magistralnaya Street, 18/8;

- 77:09:0005016:115 (13,792 sq. m.), Moscow, 3-ya Magistralnaya Street, 18/2;

- 77:09:0005016:2 (18,036 sq. m.), Moscow, 3-ya Magistralnaya Street, 18/13.

Cadastral numbers, areas and addresses of land plots owned by the Presidential Affairs Office:

- 77:09:0005016:4296 (12,047 sq. m.), Moscow, 2-y Magistralny Tupik;

- 77:09:0005016:3633 (12,197 sq. m.), Moscow, 2-y Magistralny Tupik, properties 7A and 9.

The total area of the land plots is 66,738 sq. m.

There are plans to build at least 350,000 sq. m., including the BRICS International Congress Centre, 5 residential complexes and a hotel with apartments.

The total amount of funding at the first stage before the start of construction and installation works is about 10 billion rubles, including the purchase of land, land tax, IRD, PIR, site preparation and other expenses.

Total financing for construction (SMR) of the first stage - about 40 billion roubles.

Total funding for construction (SMR) of the second stage - about 30 billion roubles.

Total funding for the construction of the third stage (SMR) - about 30 billion roubles.

Published files

Projects · Full published text

Portal of the Five Elements and the Knowledge Flame Relay

Source Status: Primary Document

The five elements are used as a cultural language for organising programmes, events and user journeys; the common protocol centres on receiving, understanding, acting, confirming and…

Source: https://speczashchita.com/knowledge/portal-pyati-stikhiy-estafeta-ognya

Open on the site

Fire • Water • Air • Earth • Ether

The concept of an ecosystem of events, knowledge, socially useful actions and continuity

1. Design

The portal of the five elements is the event-digital architecture EQUILIBRIUM, in which five universal images organize different types of human activity, and the Relay of Fire connects them into a single cycle of knowledge, action, memory and transmission.

The five elements are seen not as a physical classification of nature, but as an understandable cultural language for organizing programs, events, and user routes. Each element has its own mission, type of actions, set of events and digital portal, but they are all connected by a common protocol: “received — comprehended — made — confirmed — conveyed.”

The central mechanism is FIRE: not a monetary unit and not a means of compulsory social rating, but a voluntary digital sign of a confirmed contribution and passing the relay race. The system should be based on voluntariness, transparent rules, protection of personal data and the ability to participate without material motivation.

2. Mission and objectives

  • transfer knowledge from the mode of consumption to the mode of action and transmission;
  • create a 365-day rhythm of events that combines personal development and public benefit;
  • link culture, education, ecology, creative work and digital communities;
  • give a person a clear path of participation: from the first action to his own project or local relay race;
  • Create a single event map EQUILIBRIUM that can be scaled from community to city, country and international network.

3. Five portals

ElementalMeaningThe main questionType of actionKey result
Firewill, knowledge, memory, launchWhat am I able to light and transmit?training, mentoring, feat of action, relay raceAwakening and transmission
Waterlife, recovery, careWhat does healing and support require?water ecology, environmental health, relief, rehabilitationViability
Airthought, communication, communicationWhat should be understood and heard?dialogue, media, education, knowledge sharingConnectivity
Landwork, form, territory, heritageWhat should be built and preserved?creation, improvement, craft, production, preservationsustainable result
Ethermeaning, coordination, synchronizationHow to combine the disparate into a whole?reflection, analytics, coordination, cultural ritualsIntegrity

4. Fire Portal - Central Relay

The Fire Portal is the entrance to the system. His task is to turn meaning into action, and action into transmission. The user is not obliged to share any ideology: he chooses a specific useful action, fixes the result and, if desired, passes the baton to the next participant.

Basic cycle of fire

1. Spark. contact with knowledge or challenge.

2. Acceptance. choice of action and personal responsibility.

3. Action: Performing a specific action.

4. Result. fixation of the real change.

5. Understanding what worked and what the participant learned.

6. Transfer: Transfer of knowledge, skill, or invitation.

7. Synchronization. Return of the result to the general card EQUILIBRIUM.

5. Relay of Fire Protocol

The Relay is built as a voluntary chain of action. Transfer should not be a condition for access to basic rights, public services, education or vital resources. It is used only as a mechanism of engagement, community and confirmation of project experience.

StageWhat the participant doesWhat fixes the systemWhat the Network Gets
ReceiptSelects an event/tasktime, subject, agreementnew active node
ImplementationMakes an actionreport/confirmation by rulesreal result
VerificationIf necessary, confirm the factvalidation, level of trust in the eventProtection from fictitiousness
TransmissionShare knowledge or invite participantscommunication between nodesRelay Extension
Returngives feedbacklesson, effect, metricTraining the entire system

6. 365 events: annual rhythm

The year is built as 13 cycles for 28 days (364 days) and one Unity Day. This allows you to maintain a steady rhythm without reference to a specific calendar month. Each cycle has a theme, and each event has one clear task.

№CycleMeaning
1The Awakeningsparking intention
2DisciplineForm a rhythm
3KnowledgeGet and test knowledge
4PracticeTurn knowledge into a skill
5MinistryActing for the benefit of others
6ConnectionsCreate a live connection
7CreationCreate a new result
8Strengtheningstrengthen sustainability
9TransmissionBecome a mentor and guide
10Scaledistribute the working format
11Qualityimprove quality and evidence
12SynchronizationAgree on a personal and general
13Returnsum up and start a new round

Day 365 - Day of Unity: open synchronization of results, gratitude to participants, map of achievements, transfer of key knowledge to the next annual cycle.

7. Special program "Second Breath"

Second Breath is a Fire Portal format for memory events, continuity, and inner strength recovery. In the Russian cultural context, one of the possible events may be a voluntary action associated with the St. George ribbon: the symbol does not replace the action, but accompanies it.

Program Formula: MEMORY → THANKS → ACTION → TRANSFER.

  • Helping veterans, seniors and families in need of support
  • Collection and preservation of family histories, letters, photographs and testimonies;
  • volunteering for the improvement of memorable places;
  • lessons of living history and intergenerational meetings;
  • Relay of useful actions with public or non-public confirmation at the participant's choice.

8. Programs of other elements

WATER - "Living Environment"

  • Water ecosystems and water quality
  • restoration of springs and coasts
  • Culture of careful consumption
  • Biocenous monitoring

AIR - "Open Knowledge"

  • Culture of dialogue
  • Media literacy
  • skills transfer and mentoring
  • Public Lectures and Knowledge Laboratories

Earth - "Creating Territory"

  • Local improvement projects
  • Crafts and Production Cooperation
  • Preservation of cultural and natural heritage
  • City and Village Projects

Efir - "Single Field"

  • Map of events and meanings
  • Coordination of five portals
  • Analytics of results
  • annual and seasonal synchronizations

9. FIRE as a Digital Sign of Contribution

In the platform, the FIRE can be used as a non-purchased digital sign of the passage of a confirmed event. It should not be automatically converted into money and should not give privileges in basic public services. Its safe purpose is reputation within the voluntary project environment, confirmation of experience, access to additional projects, mentoring and communities.

CanYou can't
Confirm participationSell rating
Record Completed ActionsBuying a sign without action
Open voluntary project levelsLimiting Human Rights by Index
use for internal analytics and portfolioForced publicity or participation

10. Digital portal architecture

Main map. five portals around the central core EQUILIBRIUM; the user sees active events, cycles and routes.

Event feed. daily tasks, local initiatives, educational and cultural events.

Passport of action. purpose, organizer, conditions of participation, type of confirmation, expected effect, safety rules.

My way. personal history of completed events, acquired skills and voluntary transfers.

Map of the relay. impersonal visualization of the spread of action between cities, communities and countries.

Outline of analytics. KPI events, quality of confirmation, involvement, re-participation, social and environmental effect.

11. Roles of participants

Participant: performs the action and gets the experience.

Fire Carrier: transmits the working format to others.

Mentor: helps to pass the cycle of knowledge and practice.

Guardian: Responsible for quality of content and continuity.

Curator of the element: develops the portfolio of events of its portal.

Validator: Confirms the results where it is really necessary.

Architect EQUILIBRIUM: Agrees on connections between portals and cycles.

12. Economic model

The economy of the portal is built around the projects and the confirmed result, and not around the sale of the symbol FIRE. The cash circuit may include event sponsorship, grants, corporate programs, paid professional tasks, educational products, charitable funding, and a platform service commission.

  • free public layer - access to basic events, knowledge and volunteer programs;
  • project layer - the budgeted tasks of organizations, cities and partners;
  • professional layer - paid work and project roles with ordinary contracts and tax accounting;
  • Development Fund - financing of socially useful initiatives on transparent rules and measurable indicators.

13. Principles of trust and security

Volunteering. The participant can enter and exit the relay without negative consequences.

Data minimisation. Only what is needed for the selected event is collected.

The internal project index is not used to limit civil rights and basic services.

Verifiability. public indicators have a clear methodology and source.

Anti-fraud. suspicious results are subject to additional verification, not automatic punishment.

Cultural correctness. historical and symbolic themes are implemented with respect for people, memory and difference of views.

Priority of real effect. the number of transmissions is not more valuable than the quality of the action.

14. Roadmap for launch

StageHorizonWhat we launchTransition criterion
Prototype0–30 daysPortal of Fire, 30 events, 50–100 participantsat least 60% completed events and quality feedback
The Five Elements1–3 monthsOne pilot track for each elementsustainable re-participation and confirmed cases
City/region3–6 monthslocal map of events, partners, institutionsmeasurable social/environmental impact
The National Network6–18 monthsFederation of Local Portals and Unified Data StandardComparable performance and independent validation
International contourafter proven pilotCulturally neutral version of the five elementslocal partners and adaptation of rules

15. KPI and evidentiary value

  • Percentage of participants who completed the selected event;
  • re-participation after 30/90 days;
  • the number of confirmed useful results, not just registrations;
  • the proportion of transmissions that led to real action;
  • participants’ assessment of usefulness and safety;
  • social, educational, environmental or territorial effect by type of event;
  • the proportion of events that have undergone independent verification of the method or result.

16. Place in EQUILIBRIUM

V EQUILIBRIUM The Five Elements Portal is an event interface between a person, knowledge and projects. EQUILIBRIUM observes connections and results; Five elements give a person clear routes; The Fire Relay provides continuity; 365 events create rhythm; digital sign of FIRE records the experience; project outline turns the best initiatives into programs and real deeds.

FIVE THINGS → 365 EVENTS → ACTION → RESULTS → TRANSFER → NEW CYCLE

17. Result

Portal of Five Elements - Relay of Fire can become a single cultural event layer EQUILIBRIUM: not a system of coercion and not an abstract philosophy, but a space of voluntary action, training, mutual assistance, heritage preservation and creation of new projects. Its power arises when the symbols remain clear, the rules are voluntary and transparent, and the main proof is the real result.

Annex. 20 Event types

1. Helping people

2. Mentoring

3. Transfer of skill

4. Educational meeting

5. Study

6. Dialogue of generations

7. Memory Storage

8. Cultural event

9. Environmental Action

10. Monitoring the environment

11. Improvement

12. Creative work

13. Handicraft workshop

14. Designing solutions

15. Connecting people

16. The Volunteer Route

17. Public result

18. Reflection and feedback

19. Scaling of practice

20. Synchronization Day

Other published edition: FIRE Portal_five_verse_Relay_Fire_EQUILIBRIUM.pptx · web text +

PORTAL OF FIVE THIRD

EFIR

WATER

LAND

AIR

Relay of Fire Knowledge

EQUILIBRIUM

FIRE

Idea

Event-digital architecture, where meaning becomes action and action becomes continuity.

  • 365-day rhythm of events and personal participation
  • Link between culture, education, ecology and creative work
  • The path from the first action to your own project
  • Scaling: community → city → country → international network

Core

Voluntary digital sign of confirmed contribution and passing the relay.

NOT MONEY • NOT COOLING

received → comprehended → did → confirmed → passed

Five portals

Five cultural images organize different types of actions - all are connected by a single protocol EQUILIBRIUM.

FIRE

WATER

AIR

LAND

EFIR

Will • Knowledge • Memory • Launch

Life • Recovery • Care

thought • communication • communication

Work • Form • Territory • Heritage

meaning • coordination • synchronization

What am I able to light and transmit?

What does healing and support require?

What should be understood and heard?

What should be built and preserved?

How to combine the disparate into a whole?

The Awakening

Viability

Connectivity

Sustainable result

Integrity

Five inputs - one cycle of knowledge, action, result and transfer

Fire Portal - Central Relay

Meaning becomes action, action becomes experience, experience becomes transmission.

Iskra

Acceptance

Action

Result

Understanding

Transmission

Synchronization

Contact with knowledge

choice of action

specific act

fixation of the change

what worked

knowledge / skill / invitation

return the result to the overall map

The main criterion is a real useful effect. The number of transmissions should not be more important than the quality of the action.

Relay of Fire Protocol

Voluntary chain of actions - with clear confirmation and return of experience to the network.

Selects an event / task

new active node

Receipt

Makes an action

real result

Implementation

Confirms the fact, if necessary

Protection from fictitiousness

Verification

Share knowledge or invitation

Relay Extension

Transmission

gives feedback

Training the entire system

Return

Transfer is not a condition of access to basic rights, public services, education or vital resources.

Principle of boundaries

365 events - annual rhythm

13 Cycles × 28 days = 364 + Unity Day. Every day is a clear task.

The Awakening

Discipline

Knowledge

Practice

Ministry

Connections

Creation

Strengthening

Transmission

Scale

Quality

Synchronization

Return

365 — DAY OF UNIFICATION

Gratitude • map achieved • transfer of key knowledge to the new cycle

"Second Breath"

Special format of the Fire Portal: memory, gratitude, action and continuity.

MEMORY

THANKS

ACTION

TRANSFER

What and Whom We Keep

What we take from previous generations

What we do today

What we leave next

  • Help for veterans, seniors and families in need of support
  • preservation of family stories, letters, photos and certificates
  • improvement of memorable places and intergenerational meetings
  • voluntary relay of useful actions - publicly or non-publicly at the choice of the participant

In the Russian cultural context, one of the possible symbolic formats may be the St. George ribbon - the symbol accompanies the action, but does not replace it.

The Four Contours of Fire

Each portal turns the baton into a separate practice - from restoring the environment to coordinating the entire network.

WATER

AIR

LAND

EFIR

Living environment

Open Knowledge

Creating Territory

Unified Field

  • Water ecosystems and water quality
  • restoration of springs and coasts
  • Biocenous monitoring
  • Culture of dialogue
  • Media literacy
  • Mentoring and public laboratories
  • improvement
  • Crafts and Production Cooperation
  • preservation of natural and cultural heritage
  • Map of events and meanings
  • Coordination of five portals
  • Analytics and annual synchronizations

Digital architecture

The portal is not only content, but navigation by events, personal path and real results.

Main map

Event Tape

Passport of Action

5 portals around the kernel EQUILIBRIUM

daily tasks and local initiatives

target • conditions • confirmation • effect

My way

Relay Map

Analytic Outline

history of events, skills and transfers

Depersonalized Geography of Distribution

KPI • Quality • Involvement • effect

Roles and digital sign of fire

Reputation within the voluntary project environment - without buying a rating and without limiting civil rights.

Participant

Fire Carrier

Mentor

The Guardian

Curator of elements

Validator

Architect EQUILIBRIUM

YES

NON-GOAL

  • Confirm participation
  • Record Completed Actions
  • Open voluntary project levels
  • Sell or Buy Rating
  • Limiting Human Rights by Index
  • Forced publicity or participation

Economy portal

The fire is not for sale. The money circuit finances projects, services and confirmed results.

Free public layer

basic events • knowledge • volunteering

Project layer

Tasks of organizations, cities and partners

Professional layer

paid work and project roles

Development Fund

Financing of useful initiatives under transparent rules

Funding sources: Sponsorship • Grants • Corporate Programs • professional tasks • educational products • Charity • the Service Commission

Road map

Scaling starts with a proven prototype, not a global system announcement.

PROTOTIP

Portal of Fire • 30 Events • 50–100 Participants

≥60% completed events

0–30 days

FIVE WAYS

One pilot track for each element

re-partition + cases

1–3 months

CITY / REGION

Local Map of Events • Partners • Institutions

measurable effect

3–6 months

NATIONAL NETWORK

Federation of Local Portals •

comparable indicators

6–18 months

INTERNATIONAL CONTOUR

Culturally neutral version of the five elements

local partners + adaptation

After the pilot

KPI and Evidence

Consider not registrations and transfers, but completed events, the quality of the result and the sustainable effect.

Completion

Percentage of participants who completed a selected event

Return

re-participation in 30 / 90 days

Result

Number of confirmed useful results

Transmission

The percentage of transmissions that resulted in actual action

Security

Assessment of the usefulness and safety of participants

Effect

Social • Educational • Environmental • Territorial

Validation

percentage of events with independent verification of the method or result

365 EVENTS

FIVE WAYS

ACTION → RESULTS → TRANSFER

NEW CYCLE

FIRE

Knowledge becomes Fire when it passes through a person, turns into action and is transmitted further.

EQUILIBRIUM

Published files

SPECZASHCHITA · Thematic Package

Film and talk transcripts

All 74 films in the public film library: brief summaries and published subtitle or transcript text. Timecodes have been removed for continuous reading; films without published text are represented by a description and a video link.

Materials: 74 · with full text: 71 · Build Date: 2026-09-29

The web text is saved from the public version of the site. For materials in PDF without a text web version and documents on request, separate cards are provided. All versions of the originals are listed in the material.

Download the package as a PDF

Films and performances · Full published text

SPECZASHCHITA — Cooperative of a Common Goal

Source status: Public film library

People, knowledge and shared endeavour in a vivid image of cooperation. The film presents the idea of a common goal, connections between sectors and creating together.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

SPECZASHCHITA. Cooperative of a single purpose. People, knowledge, and resources come together for a useful common cause. At the center of this plan is the man and the future of the territory.

The power of collaboration is participation. One brings knowledge, the other technology, the third experience. Labour, property and capital are accounted for according to agreed rules.

The common goal brings together different possibilities.

A single university is an image of an open space of knowledge.

Here the research meets the practice and the experience becomes available to the teams.

To learn, to create, to transfer knowledge is to open up new possibilities.

Inter-industry relationships help to see the whole.

Energy, water, production, health, and education all influence each other.

A single plan connects the tasks, resources and responsibilities of the participants.

From design to business. First the need, then the team and a small pilot.

Documents, data sources and verification of the result make the path clear.

Confirmed experience can be developed further.

Here's the solution: collaboration. Here are the solutions: knowledge and joint action. SPECZASHCHITA. Cooperative of a single purpose.

Creating the future together. The world is a world without borders.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

SPECZASHCHITA — Creating Banking Systems

Source status: Public film library

The financial architecture of a shared endeavour: contributions, settlements and responsibility in one system. Explore a concept connecting resources, trust and shared development.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

SPECZASHCHITA. Creation of banking systems.

The strategic concept SFERA combines finance, technology and cooperation around the development of enterprises, people and territories.

A strong project needs capital, clear rules and responsibility for the result. The idea of the system is to link these conditions into a single architecture of long-term development.

In this model, SPECZASHCHITA organizes execution: forms design teams and production chains, integrates technologies and competencies, accompanies pilots and scaling.

SFERA creates an interaction environment.

EQUILIBRIUM is responsible for analytics and evidence.

ECO-PI-PI-AI sets the contractual and financial framework for projects with measurable results.

At the center of the banking concept is the Russian banking core.

Its intended objectives are: accounts and settlements, lending, guarantees and project financing. Banking operations are carried out by licensed participants.

The concept provides for three areas: infrastructure and public-private partnership; industrial cooperation and the local economy; social programs for families, veterans, people with disabilities and social enterprises.

It is proposed to build independent funds, cooperatives and project companies around the core.

Each participant has their own obligations and responsibilities.

Financial flows and accounting are divided.

The path of the project begins with an application and examination.

Then check the rights, financial model and contracts.

After the risk decision, phased funding with enforcement is opened.

The digital platform should combine the project passport, the register of rights and obligations, budgets and reporting.

Transparent solution log allows you to track the progress of the project from design to result.

Practical application - modernization of industrial enterprise.

Energy supply, environmental technologies and digital monitoring are combined into a long-term contractual model.

Funding is linked to cash flow and measurable indicators.

The basis of trust is primary data, clear methodology and independent verification. Risk management includes expertise, limits, reserves, audits and milestones at each stage.

International development is considered through partner banks and national operators in the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union and BRICS plus. Common standards and technologies are combined with independent licenses, capital and responsibility.

Implementation begins with the founders, the audit of assets and the choice of a banking model. The next step is the regional pilot and the first projects. Scaling is based on proven practice and the willingness of partners.

SPECZASHCHITA invites banks, enterprises, regions and experts to study the model and prepare pilot projects.

Finance for Creation. Technology for development.

Responsibility for the result. SFERA. A world without borders.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Who Are We? Why Do We Exist? — A New World Order

Source status: Public film library

From personal choice to shared endeavour. A film about trust, learning, cooperation and care for the living world, coming together in a vision of an open future.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Who are we?

People with different fates, knowledge and experience.

Everyone has a home, loved ones, a favorite thing and questions that are difficult to answer alone.

We are united by the desire to live with dignity and leave behind something that will help others.

The New World Order begins with this human choice.

Orion turns the question to everyone: what place are you ready to take in the common life?

Our response is born in participation, in willingness to hear and to take the first step.

Why do we unite?

So that a person has the strength to develop, the family has a support, and children have a future on a living earth.

To useful work brought tangible results and kept what depends on life itself.

The biotron in this story means taking care of the living.

EQUILIBRIUM reminds of the balance of man, economy and nature.

The general meaning becomes clear when we ask about each decision: who will it help and what will remain after us?

Change begins with the person who decides to learn.

See your abilities, ask a question, master the skill and bring the work to a result.

FENIX connects personal development with common cause.

Here everyone can have their own way: to explore, to build, to grow, to explain, to help.

Next to the master there is a student, next to the idea - the first work.

Thus knowledge becomes skill, skill brings benefit, and a person finds his place among other people.

Common cause arises where people know how to negotiate.

SPECZASHCHITA sets the image of cooperation: find the necessary competencies, distribute tasks and support participants.

EQUILIBRIUM helps to express the big picture: who is involved, what resources are there and what result we expect.

In the case of Inmortrans, this means clear roles for the researcher, designer, manufacturer and crew.

Everyone understands their contribution and the limits of responsibility.

Trust grows when agreements are fulfilled, work is visible, and difficulties can be discussed openly and on time.

Let’s take an obvious example: the ship and its route.

For the flight to take place, knowledge, production, port and coordinated work of people are needed.

Inmortrans shows how to link these parts into one program.

Science investigates the problem and tests the solution.

Manufacturing creates and maintains machinery.

Logistics connects the ship, berth, passenger and cargo.

Shipbuilding and repair, bunkering, transportation and tourism reveal different aspects of this work.

Data helps us see what is really going on.

The general idea takes a measure: proper equipment, clear route, quality of service and a result that can be checked.

The river carries ships and gives life to the shores.

Water is therefore a development concern.

Observations of the water area, waste management, the energy of the ship and the shore require attention and coordinated work.

It is important to understand the consequences of each decision: for people, for technology, for the environment.

EQUILIBRIUM brings us back to equilibrium.

We compare the idea with the result, notice deviations and correct errors.

Thus, responsibility becomes a daily practice and a condition for the continuation of the common cause.

Let’s start with a single object and an understandable task.

We will assemble a team, determine the initial state and agree in advance on how to evaluate the result.

The first ninety days in the proposed program are the preparation time and limited verification.

This experience will show what works and what needs to change.

FENIX returns the question to a person: what are you ready to learn, what kind of work to do, to whom to transfer your experience?

The change begins in concrete action.

The archive preserves the experience so that the next generation can continue our journey.

Who are we?

People who learn and create together.

Why us?

To save lives, to help each other, and to leave the future open to new generations.

The New World Order.

The world is a world without borders.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Russia — Humans and Biotic Communities. The Rebirth of the Earth

Source status: Public film library

Soil, water, the microscopic world and people are parts of one living system. The film brings together images of nature, discovery and cooperation in a story about careful environmental restoration and shared care for the Earth.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Russia.

A new order continues with a simple realisation: human beings live within nature.

We breathe its air, dependent on water, soil and connections between living beings.

Biocenoses are communities of life in which our action never remains separate.

The future begins with attention to the place where we live and create.

Look at this living tissue.

Under our feet there are roots, fungal threads and microorganisms.

Water connects soil, plants and landscapes.

The work of the microcosm is part of the Earth's common life.

For care to become meaningful, we need to learn to see these relationships and notice where they are broken before suggesting change.

Recovery begins with a study of the initial state.

Observation helps to formulate the question, research to choose the action, verification to see the consequences.

We envision a future where knowledge connects the researcher, the farmer, and the local community.

Their task is to understand the living conditions and to work with them carefully, while maintaining the ability to refine the solution as experience arises.

Working together starts with an understandable need.

People align purpose, roles and contributions, see available resources and boundaries of responsibility.

In the proposed framework ECO PPA, the need is related to the confirmed resource, agreement, execution and verification.

This approach sets the direction of cooperation: every action has a basis, and its result can be discussed.

A culture of transparency emerges from concerted action.

We represent an evolutionary financial system in which the origin of funds is understandable, obligations are distinguishable, and resources are directed towards a common goal.

Open records help distinguish intent from performance and compare costs with verified results.

Caring for the Earth gives meaning to this work, and responsibility is retained at every stage of it.

This clarity is expressed by Crystal seven hundred and forty-one.

Its facets remind of the connection of the desired image, agreed requirements and fact.

The whole becomes clearer when you see the source of the record, the person’s contribution and the result of the check.

Here unity preserves differences and allows knowledge to be transmitted along with reasons to trust them.

We see the Earth’s rebirth as an ongoing work: to understand, to coordinate, to do, to test and to preserve.

Russia can become a space of cooperation, where human development is connected with the life of soil, water and natural communities.

Our next step is small, but its meaning is great: to leave new generations more opportunities to take care of the living world.

Sphere. A world without borders.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

INMORTRANS platform — Logistics, science, production

Source status: Public film library

Logistics, science and production come together around a proposed maritime pilot. The film explains participants’ roles, data for decisions and the sequence of joint work.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Inmortrans platform.

Logistics, science and production are interconnected areas of the “Shipping in the New Order” programme.

We propose to combine the tasks of the fleet, ports and transportation around the testable practical result.

The purpose of the program is to link the condition of the ship, the work of the berth and the schedule with the costs and quality of service.

For each solution, you need raw data, understandable limitations and a way to check.

The first unit of work becomes one object: a vessel, a node, a route or a shore section.

Before the pilot begins, the owner, supervisor, access to data and acceptance criteria should be determined.

Inmortrans is proposed as an industry organizer.

SPECZASHCHITA coordinates performers within the confirmed authority.

EQUILIBRIUM links object passports, data and solutions.

These roles need to be agreed upon.

Research centres, design offices, shipyards and testing organizations are invited for a specific task.

The request indicates the object, competence, scope of work and the expected document.

Participation is arranged separately.

The production chain begins with the material and the ship's node, continues by ship, port and route.

The service returns information about failures and costs in the next version of the technical solution.

Science begins with an operational problem.

Defect, simple or resource consumption get a passport and a comparison base.

The test method and the result criteria shall be agreed prior to the evaluation of the material or design.

Production links the technical task, performers and equipment with future operating conditions.

Reception, maintenance and repair are considered as part of the life cycle.

This work helps to clarify the requirements.

The program has four areas: shipbuilding and repair, bunkering, cargo and passenger transportation and tourism.

They are united by the operational need, and the composition of the work is determined for each specific project.

Logistics links scheduling, loading, port windows and maintenance.

For the tourist product, transfers and a coastal program are added.

The plan and the fact of the flight allow you to see the causes of downtime and deviations.

Each object needs a passport and a stable ID.

Each dimension has a source, time, units and methodology.

The calculation model is connected to a specific issue after checking the quality of the data.

The authorized specialist makes the decision and retains its basis.

The digital recommendation does not in itself change the regime of the vessel or equipment.

Access to systems and practical work are agreed with the owner.

The environmental part begins with observations of the water area and comparable sampling conditions.

Separate collection, accounting and confirmed transfer of waste link environmental statements to measurements and documents.

Coastal power requires matching power, compatibility, and connection security.

The choice of fuel and equipment takes into account supply, properties and maintenance.

The decision is prepared for a certain ship and berth.

The efficiency of the flight is estimated by comparable data: speed, route, load and condition of the hull.

Seasonal and weather are taken into account separately.

The effect cannot be attributed to one change without checking the other factors.

For the first pilot, three options are offered: the resource of the ship's node, data from the voyage and berth, or the coastal balance of water, waste and energy.

The choice determines the availability of the object and the possibility of verification.

Among the indicators are the time of port turnover, the regularity of flights, fuel consumption and equipment readiness.

Base and target values are approved after measurements.

The result is compared under agreed conditions.

The economy takes into account demand, investment, energy, crew, repairs and downtime.

The basis for funding are the proposals of the performers and the calculation of scenarios.

The decision to implement is made separately after the preparation of the estimates.

The proposed preparation plan spans ninety days.

First, object and access, then initial measurements, analysis, and limited verification.

The result is a passport of the result, an estimate and a decision on the next stage.

The construction of the ship has a separate calendar.

Inmortrans platform: logistics, science, production.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

INMORTRANS — Admiralty of the New Order

Source status: Public film library

A presentation of a maritime platform concept: fleets, ports and transport as parts of an interconnected development system. The original slides introduce its vision and main directions.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Admiralty of the New Order.

The concept of the Inmortrans Group platform for coordination of marine and river projects.

The proposed model combines science, shipbuilding, ports and operation.

The customer receives an understandable composition of the work and the project prepared for the decision to launch.

Participants - agreed requirements, baseline data and a fixed role in the implementation.

The platform has four areas: shipbuilding and modernization, bunkering and supply, cargo and passenger transportation and tourism.

Each direction connects the customer's need with the technical solution, performers and organization of work.

The historical section refers to passenger and tourist traffic since the year one thousand nine hundred nineties.

In the archival material, the project of the ferry bureau "Almaz" is given: from three hundred to three hundred and thirty passengers and from forty to forty-five cars.

These are the parameters of the historical project.

Shipbuilding begins with an operational task: route, sailing conditions, passengers and cargo.

Next - the choice of the type of vessel and the technical task, the preparation of production and equipment.

The life cycle includes acceptance, crew training, maintenance and repair.

Bunkering and supply are built with profile operators.

First, the fuel, volumes, seasonality and delivery points are determined.

The supplier, schedule, quality and acceptance are then agreed upon.

Control covers documents, expenses and balances.

The route, timetable, demand, vessel and port infrastructure play a key role in transportation.

In tourism, the water part of the journey is connected with the coastal program, accommodation and excursions.

Booking, maintenance and work with tour operators complement the product.

The organizational model includes a project office and four groups: technical, commercial, financial and operational.

They keep the project passport and decisions, agree on requirements and contractual terms, prepare calculations and control the launch.

The pilot is trained in four stages.

Selection of task and customer.

Inspection of demand, ship, port and executors.

Development of a technical solution, budget and contractual scheme.

The decision to launch with approved roles, schedule and funding terms.

To calculate the project, you need data on transportation, tariffs, seasonality and loading.

Ship, line preparation, fuel, port services, crew and maintenance are taken into account separately.

The result is loading scenarios, cash flow, and conditions for sustainable operation.

The subject of the first meeting is one pilot project with a certain customer and a measurable result.

The next steps are: sharing of raw data, sharing of responsibilities and a joint plan.

Infrastructure owners, ship owners, shipyards, suppliers and route operators are invited to discuss.

Contact for discussion — Sergei Leonidovich Sokolov, Vice President for Finance.

The phone and email are shown on the screen.

Inmortrans.

Admiralty of the New Order.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Russia — A New Order

Source status: Public film library

Horizons in space, a living planet, energy and the power of knowledge. A vision of a future where different cultures and skills come together for creation and responsible cooperation.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Russia — A New Order.

Before us is the image of a country that chooses to be the flagship of creation: to connect knowledge and cultures, to open up space for a common future.

Its scale is revealed in the ability to hear different voices and turn diversity into collaboration.

Such a path requires a great goal.

And before we rush to the stars, we need to see a world that is already entrusted to our care.

This world reveals itself on different scales.

Amazing shapes are born in the mineral depths.

Plants are drawn to the light, fungi interweave the soil, animals master air, water and land.

Under the increase there is an invisible before microworld.

We look at this diversity to understand the connections that life depends on.

The ability to notice them changes the very question of development: how to create a new one, preserving the conditions of existence of all living things?

The answer begins with knowledge.

Observation gives rise to question, question leads to experience, and experience requires verification.

The greatness of knowledge lies in the honesty of this movement.

Here meet the researcher and engineer, accurate calculation and bold imagination.

Russia of the future can unite such efforts, making education and open exchange of experience the basis of creation.

The deeper our understanding of the world, the more carefully we manage the forces that we have learned to use.

Energy makes sense through what it serves.

Light, movement, warmth support the work of a complex world.

Our idea is to combine technical power with a careful attitude to resources and the environment.

Let us trace the path from the source to the useful action and its consequences.

Such attentiveness turns strength into responsibility and leads us to the art of cooperation.

Cooperation also has its own geometry.

A common goal connects people, clear roles help to act, and feedback holds the whole.

Here, each participant is valuable: he who researches, designs, creates and accepts the result.

Trust grows when agreements are clear, work is visible, and solutions can be negotiated.

So many independent efforts are formed into a movement that no one person could carry out alone.

This movement becomes visible when the design takes on a material form.

The drawing turns into a design, the design passes the test, and the route opens.

The ship here is an image of concerted work: science, production, maintenance and navigation.

The principle of a new order is to combine capabilities for a clear benefit.

But even the most inspiring project should answer a simple question: how to check that the chosen path really works?

The first step is to measure our capabilities.

We will choose a task, determine the initial state and agree in advance what we will consider the result.

A limited pilot will give material for verification, and errors will become the basis for corrections.

Responsibility continues after launch: in observation, care for people and nature, willingness to change the decision.

Such experience can be transferred further - together with conclusions, questions and the right to continue searching.

Heritage is a living opportunity to move on.

Preserved knowledge meets a new question, and earthly care opens the way to space.

We represent Russia as the flagship of such a movement: an inquisitive, creative, open cooperation of civilizations.

The greatness of the future is measured by how many opportunities it leaves for life.

From the crystal to the star, from the first observation to the general accomplishment, we have a continuing path ahead of us.

Sphere. A world without borders.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Russia — A New World Order

Source status: Public film library

A bilingual film about people, the living Earth and cooperation. Space, geometry and transparent diagrams bring projects together in a shared vision of the future; Russian and English narration feature in the same edit.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Russia. The New World Order.

Russia. A new world order.

Orion. The overall horizon.

Orion. A shared horizon.

Sphere. New generations.

Sfera. For new generations.

Russia. Humans and biocenoses.

Russia. People and living communities.

Biotron. Caring for life.

Biotron. Care for life.

Living tissue of the Earth.

The living fabric of Earth.

Earth's Rebirth. We're taking care.

Earth’s rebirth. Sustaining our care.

FENIX. The power of creation.

Fenix. The power to create.

Knowledge for recovery.

Knowledge for restoration.

Crystal seven four one.

Crystal seven four one.

SPECZASHCHITA. General business.

Speczashchita. A shared purpose.

PPA. Clear need.

PPA. A clear need.

ECO PPA. Agreed resources.

ECO PPA. Coordinated resources.

The evolutionary financial system.

An evolutionary financial system.

Inmortrans. Connecting the coasts.

Inmortrans. Connecting shores.

Inmortrans. One program.

Inmortrans. One development programme.

Inmortrans. The first pilot.

Inmortrans. The first pilot.

EQUILIBRIUM. A sustainable whole.

Equilibrium. A resilient whole.

EQUILIBRIUM. Development and care.

Equilibrium. Progress and care.

EQUILIBRIUM. Responsible decisions.

Equilibrium. Responsible decisions.

Archive. Preserve the legacy.

Archive. Preserving our heritage.

FENIX. New opportunities.

Fenix. New possibilities.

Russia. Responsibility and Creation.

Russia. Responsibility and creation.

Sphere. A world without borders.

Sfera. A world without borders.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Russia — The Golden Age — A New World Order

Source status: Public film library

A bright vision of a possible future: people, knowledge, creative work and peaceful cooperation. A golden dawn and a finale in space bring the story together in a short, inspiring film.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Every era begins with a dream.

To see beyond the horizon a country where power serves life, knowledge opens up opportunities, and human dignity becomes a measure of success.

Let's imagine Russia of the future.

The sun rises above the great earth.

Cities and villages are waking up.

In every home there is warmth, in every business there is meaning, in every child there is a whole universe of talents.

The Golden Age is born in action.

When a teacher helps you believe in yourself.

A scientist turns a discovery into a help to people.

Farmers take care of fertile soil.

A master creates something that will serve generations.

Technology frees up time for creativity.

Clean energy fuels cities.

New roads connect spaces, and culture connects hearts.

We can build the New World Order on respect.

The right of peoples to preserve their language and choose their own path.

On honest cooperation, mutual responsibility and care for a common home - the Earth.

In such a world, wealth is measured by quality of life.

Strength is the ability to create.

The future is the opportunities we leave to children.

Russia can contribute to this world its gift: the space of thought, the depth of culture, the courage of discovery and the talent to unite people for the sake of a great cause.

The golden age begins with our choices.

Learning. Work.

Take care. Create.

Russia. time of creation.

The world is a world without borders.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Russia — A Vision of the Future

Source status: Public film library

A brief vision of a creative future: knowledge, decent work, clean energy and respectful cooperation. The film invites viewers to see shared development through people’s everyday actions.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Russia.

The New World Order.

The future begins with what we create together.

A teacher who helps a child believe in themselves.

With an engineer turning an idea into a useful technology.

With a doctor, for whom every discovery is a human life.

We see Russia, where knowledge opens up opportunities, work brings dignity, and development makes life better in every city and village.

A world in which countries cooperate while maintaining their voice.

Where different cultures meet with respect, and common challenges unite people.

Clean energy.

Modern schools.

Scientific discovery.

Caring for nature.

This way creates our decision, responsibility and daily work.

Russia.

To create.

Collaborate.

Develop.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Russia — Manifesto of the New Order

Source status: Public film library

A manifesto of dignity, knowledge and responsible shared endeavour. Care for people and nature forms the basis of the proposed vision of the future.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Russia. Manifesto of the New Order.

The future of the country begins with how we treat people, our business and the land on which we live.

We see Russia as a country where human dignity determines the meaning of development. Where the child is open to the road to knowledge, an adult - the opportunity to work honestly, the elder - care and respect.

A new order begins with a simple principle: every person matters.

His life, his freedom, his talent and his right to be heard.

We choose the economy of creation.

Let the work of the teacher, doctor, engineer, worker and farmer receive a worthy assessment.

Let your business can be built according to clear rules, and new technologies help a person.

We choose knowledge.

A strong school, an accessible education, a science that seeks answers. Ability to think independently, verify information and turn discoveries into useful solutions.

We choose fair rules.

A law that is binding on everyone.

Open solutions and clear public spending.

Responsibility for promises and the ability to correct mistakes.

Russia’s strength lies in its people, in the diversity of its cultures and regions. A common home requires respect for different voices, cooperation and participation in the affairs of your city and village.

We take care of the land, water and forests.

Quality of life is measured by clean air, available help, time for family, and confidence in the future.

We choose peace and good neighbourliness.

Cooperation in which dignity, autonomy and mutual respect are maintained.

The New Order is created through daily actions: doing work honestly, supporting someone in difficulty, sharing knowledge and joining together for a useful cause.

Let each common project have a clear goal, an open course of work and a result that people can appreciate.

Russia of the future begins with our responsibility today.

With trust, which we confirm by deed.

With respect to man.

Russia. Manifesto of the New Order.

To create. Merge. Take care.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

System of Funds — 19 Areas of Shared Endeavour

Source status: Public film library

The funds concept connects needs, resources and participants’ responsibilities. The film’s sections explain the proposed process for supporting joint projects.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The New Order fund system is a concept linking an individual’s personal capital with the collective resources of cooperation. Its purpose is to guide every contribution from a clear objective to a verifiable result.

It is based on nineteen registers, nineteen development directions and a general accounting mechanism.

In the presented model, the fund combines assets, rights and rules for their use.

A personal, family or personal fund preserves the goals and interests of the founder. The Cooperative Fund brings together voluntary contributions for a joint project. The meta-register links participants, commitments, and outcomes while maintaining the differences between these contours.

Architecture is developed on four levels.

The first is a person, a family, a family and a name.

The second is a cooperative and a specific project.

The third is the territory, industry and macroregion.

The fourth is the state and planetary contour.

At each level, it is proposed to link resources, responsibilities and measurable results.

Registers and directions perform different tasks.

Registries answer questions: who participates, what owns, what commitments are made and what is achieved.

Directions show which tasks resources are directed to.

One fund uses several registers, and each direction combines different types of funds. It is these connections that form the matrix of the system.

The first group of registers forms the basis of trust.

Here are fixed participants and beneficiaries, digital passports of funds, membership and deposits, property and other rights, as well as assets and their independent evaluation. This link allows you to trace the origin of the contribution and the basis of the rights of each participant.

The second group links accounts and trust funds with transactions, goals, projects, and contracts. Before financing, it is proposed to check the purpose of payment, limit, obligations and risks. In documents, this approach is called smart money: the rules for using funds are set in advance and checked during execution.

The third group covers intellectual rights, competencies, social services, natural capital and cultural heritage.

It expands the project assessment: human development, knowledge preservation and environmental status are taken into account. For each result, you need your own indicator, source of data and method of confirmation.

The fourth group is responsible for sustainability.

These are reserves and mutual assistance, results and related balances, verification and protection, planning calendar. Here, the plan and fact are compared, deviations and control points are recorded. Long-term cycles from the concept are considered as the author's planning model.

Now — nineteen directions.

The first four are: government design and related balances; people, demographics and personal development; family, communities and social programs; health, rehabilitation and longevity.

They connect the overall goals of the system with the needs of the individual and the family.

The next group is education, personnel and Cities of Knowledge; science, research and intellectual rights; Spiritual Culture and ancestral heritage; industry, materials science and engineering.

In this part, the personal educational fund, the scientist’s personal fund and the production fund can support the common path from knowledge to implementation.

Next come energy, tariffs and carbon units; agriculture, food and water; nature, biosphere, biocenoses and climate; construction, housing and urban infrastructure.

The concept connects the financing of these areas with the state of the territory, the availability of resources and the cost of the full life cycle of projects.

Four more areas provide the connectivity of the system: transport, logistics and development corridors; digital platforms, artificial intelligence, GRID and data; finance and smart money; property rights, shares, trusts and cooperation.

For each design, the authors provide for the definition of rights, liability and applicable legal regime.

The list of security, risks and mobilization complexes; international cooperation and the Assembly of the Peoples of the World; space, spaceports and Galactic Culture is completed.

These are proposed contours for reserves, joint programs and long-term projects.

Their launch requires individual participants, resources, agreements and verifiable stages.

The route begins with the registration of contributions and rights.

The participant chooses the goal and the project.

Then the contract, estimate, limit and counterparty are checked.

After funding, performance and results are taken into account.

The distribution formula is fixed in advance: it determines the shares of participants, reserves, development, social objectives, nature and future generations.

The fund’s passport collects key conditions in one place: who participates, what is the mission, what assets are transferred, who makes the decisions and what costs are acceptable.

Here, risks, reserve, distribution of the result, continuity and audit are recorded. The passport becomes a common point of verification of agreements.

A living balance compares the plan, resources, commitments and effects achieved. Financial indicators are considered together with production, social, natural and cultural. For example, expenses, confirmed competencies and employment are important for an educational project.

Each indicator should have a measurement period, source and responsible party.

The council of the system approves the rules.

The operator executes decisions within the limits of authority.

The accounting group keeps registers and balance, the expert council checks the methods, independent verification - data and results.

SPECZASHCHITA combines seven contours of protection.

In the concept, a legally significant decision remains with the authorized person.

One of the proposed pilots is the Intellectual Results Fund.

The author makes the right to develop, the cooperative supports the introduction, production uses technology on agreed terms.

After the evaluation of the result, the income is distributed between the author, the scientific organization and the production. Part of the funds is directed to a new cycle of research according to a pre-approved formula.

Accompanying comparative analysis suggests using historical experience as a source of ideas for modern institutions.

Its recommended version retains the current Constitution as a legal framework and combines digital code, planning, accounting and independent verification.

In the materials themselves, the system of funds is designated as a concept that requires separate legal and financial study.

The road map starts with classifiers, passports and legal analysis in the first month.

Up to ninety days it is proposed to launch a minimum version of the Metareister and several types of funds. Then connect industries and territories.

During the year - check all directions, and on the horizon of two years - consider replication.

The meaning of the system of funds is to preserve the connection between a person, his contribution and the overall result. To begin with, you need a specific pilot, a clear passport, confirmed rights and open inspection rules. So much architecture gets practical content.

Sphere. A world without borders.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Manifesto of Man

Source status: Public film library

Ten original reflections on choice, dignity and a shared future. Voice and imagery invite viewers to consider their personal involvement in creation.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

I am a human being and the dignity of each one is inviolable to me.

I am free to choose and take responsibility for my actions.

I cherish life, the Earth and everything that is entrusted to our generation.

I search for the truth, test knowledge and know how to admit mistakes.

I am developing my abilities to benefit people.

I build relationships on honesty, respect and mutual assistance.

I choose cooperation and resolve differences without violence.

I combine knowledge and work to change the world for the better.

I preserve the wisdom of the past and open the way for future generations.

I start with myself to build a world without borders with others.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

The New World Order: Ten Thoughts on the Future

Source status: Public film library

An original manifesto on cooperation, meaning and responsibility. Ten thematic episodes form an invitation to conscious shared endeavour.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The New World Order begins by recognising every person’s dignity.

Freedom gains strength when joined with responsibility for a shared future.

Human life, health and development become the measure of our decisions.

Knowledge is open to everyone, and technology serves creation and peace.

Cooperation brings people together while preserving freedom of thought and cultural diversity.

Justice emerges where work is valued and the rules are clear to everyone.

Earth is our shared home, and its well-being depends on our actions.

We preserve the heritage of the past and pass on a living planet to future generations.

Trust grows from honest words, open decisions and promises kept.

We create the New World Order together through knowledge, work and mutual help.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Living Village

Source status: Public film library

A vision of a rural area where work, knowledge and local connections sustain community life. The film presents a proposed rural development pilot.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The village lives when the family has a future, the farm has a job, and people have the opportunity to help each other.

"Living Village" proposes to combine these supports in one pilot project.

In the center are people and family.

The opportunity to work on your land, raise children, learn and transfer experience.

The development of the territory begins with an understanding of what its inhabitants need.

The next pillar is farming.

The cultivation, storage and processing of products form a common chain.

The full cycle biofarm is one of the images of the future project, which will have to be adapted to local conditions.

Cooperation helps to act together: to combine purchases, to use equipment, to organize processing and marketing.

Participants agree on tasks, resources and responsibilities.

Thus, everyone has the opportunity to contribute to the common cause.

Earth is the basis of this work.

Soil, water, plants and living communities require careful consideration.

First, the study of the initial state.

Then - coordinated actions, observations and verification of results together with specialists.

The first ninety days after the pilot's approval is the proposed launch path.

Select a site and assemble a team.

Study the territory.

Carry out the agreed work.

Check the results and determine the next steps.

The scope, resources and modalities of participation have yet to be agreed.

Residents, farmers, cooperatives, specialists and partners who are close to the idea of rural development are invited to work together.

"Living Village". People. Earth.

Opportunities. The future.

The roots are in tradition. The look forward.

Let’s start with a specific place and a common cause.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

FENIX — From Personal Choice to Shared Endeavour

Source status: Public film library

A film about self-development, culture and the practice of cooperation. The FENIX working concept shows a path from personal choice to a useful shared result.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Where does development begin?

A question that people choose for themselves.

With the desire to understand, learn and do something useful.

"FENIX" — the evolutionary system and the program of national self-development "Knowledge and Energy". Its central idea is to go from personal choice to common cause.

The program is based on respect for the person, voluntariness and the opportunity to revise your route.

The participant chooses the task and pace.

The mentor helps to find sources, master the way of action and see the result.

The quality of a specific work is assessed, and the dignity of a person does not depend on indicators.

The path "FENIX" consists of five stages.

Spark is the choice of question and goal.

Fire is learning and practice.

Ashes are the analysis of experience, errors and limitations.

Ascension is a learned mode of action and a confirmed result.

Flight is the transfer of knowledge and the beginning of the next cycle.

The thirteen contours of personal development help you choose your entry point: health, intelligence, skills, education, work, family, creativity, nature, and personal meanings.

It is a space of choice.

For the first step, one important question and feasible work is enough.

Nineteen directions connect the personal route with practical tasks.

Among them are education, water and soils, energy, materials, transport, science, the digital environment and mutual assistance. A person can start small and then join forces with a workshop, community, or territory.

Culture and science provide two complementary ways of working.

Culture helps us understand experience, preserve memory and create our own works. Scientific practice teaches you to ask a question, choose a method, record observations and indicate the boundaries of the conclusion.

For example, participants can study the history of a family subject, compare two readings of a text, or create a live knowledge catalog.

It is important to separate the observation from the assumption, specify the author and source, get feedback and save the corrected version.

How to turn an inspirational idea into a feasible task?

For this purpose, the "Designer of the ideal standard" is proposed.

It shares image, working standard and fact.

The image describes the desired future.

The standard sets the agreed requirements.

The fact shows what has actually been done and how it is confirmed.

The project receives a passport from thirteen fields: it specifies the result, conditions, resources, responsibility and verification.

Twenty control questions help assess benefit, feasibility, safety, and evidence.

The requirements are consistent prior to work and may be revised to explain the reasons.

“Crystal seven hundred and forty-one” is the name of the proposed data structure.

Three layers: the image, the standard and the fact - are associated with nineteen directions and thirteen fields of the passport.

This scheme helps to compare the idea and the result; for a small task, only the right positions are selected.

The second volume translates the principles into practice: first conversation, personal route, classes, mentoring, working forms and acceptance of the result.

One of the suggested formats is twelve weeks and thirty-six hours per participant.

This is an example for coordination with a specific site.

Knowledge and energy require careful attention to resources.

Time, work, materials, money and physical energy are counted separately.

The Archive retains authorship, sources, method, limitations, and history of corrections.

So experience can be tested and meaningfully applied again.

Materials "FENIX" describe the working concept and methodology.

Training examples and plans of the pilot have yet to be tested by practice.

The first cycle begins with an understandable task, an accessible mentor, validated resources, and a pre-agreed way to evaluate.

Choose a question. Learn the way of action.

Create a job. Check the result.

Save and pass on the experience.

"FENIX" - from personal choice to the common cause. Knowledge is burning.

Working together helps us move forward.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

FENIX — Foundations of Self-Development

Source status: Public film library

From choosing a task to checking the result: an introduction to the practice of meaningful self-development. A learning example shows how to preserve experience and improve your own work.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

FENIX. Foundations of self-development.

How to turn the desire to learn something new into an understandable result?

The designer of the ideal benchmark offers a consistent path: choose your task, define requirements, do the work, test it and save the experience.

The beginning of the route is an issue that is important to the person himself.

The participant chooses the target and the permissible load, can change the decision or pause.

The teacher helps to master the way of action.

The standard refers to work and conditions of participation; it does not determine the value of a person.

The ideal image describes the desired benefit.

The working standard specifies the agreed requirements, limitations and method of verification.

The actual result is the work done and the observed data.

For example: I want to understand resource accounting; I agree to keep a journal and explain the calculation; then I present records and a verified result.

The designer offers eight steps.

Clarify the need. Describe the initial conditions.

Choose the desired benefit.

Set the criteria. Check resources and security.

Carry out limited practical work.

Compare the result with the requirements.

Save the experience and decide what to do in the next cycle.

Thirteen personal contours help to choose a field of development: for example, mind, skills, education or creativity.

Nineteen directions connect it to practical tasks.

Thirteen passport fields describe the project itself.

These lists perform different functions and do not replace each other.

The passport fixes the task and its participants, the boundaries of work, the necessary knowledge, result, plan, resources and funding.

Separately, safety, evidence, acceptance and continuation are described. Short answers are enough for a small project. If the condition has not yet been determined, this is noted directly.

The phrase "I want to understand better" expresses an intention.

The working criterion makes it verifiable: fill in the training journal yourself, repeat the calculation and explain the data limitations.

The terms, time, method and rule of the decision are agreed in advance.

Useful quality can be described in words, if the basis of the assessment is clear.

The check answers two questions: is it made according to the agreed requirements and does it solve the user's task?

For the skill you need a sample of independent work.

For the calculation - the initial data and method.

The chain of evidence should be traceable: source, method, data, calculation, conclusion.

Twenty audits are grouped into four groups: benefit, feasibility, safety and evidence.

They help to see the gaps before the start and evaluate the result.

Success on several points does not close a critical note.

The promised resource still needs to be confirmed, and the working conditions agreed.

There are four statuses for each criterion: fulfilled, not fulfilled, data insufficient, not applicable with justification. The comment relates to specific work.

Together with it, they indicate the proof, the responsible person and the next step. The lack of data is an occasion to clarify the conclusion and method of verification.

Let’s look at an example from the document.

Twenty cards have been prepared for independent maintenance of the energy consumption log. Eighteen have passed the test; two have no rights to the illustrations.

In addition, one of the two users could not repeat the calculation without a hint.

The entire set has not yet been accepted.

The next step is to solve the issue with illustrations, clarify the instructions and repeat the user check.

You can separately agree on a smaller volume of eighteen cards.

At the same time, the original version, comments and corrections are retained.

Development becomes visible through changes in work and the mastered mode of action.

Work is transferred to the Archive along with authorship, sources, conditions and restrictions.

"Crystal seven hundred and forty-one" denotes the proposed structure: three layers, nineteen directions and thirteen fields.

For a specific task, the necessary positions are used.

A complex digital platform is not necessary for the first step.

FENIX offers a working methodology that has to be tested by practice.

Start with one task.

Agree on results and support.

Do the work, consider the comments and keep the experience.

So personal choice becomes the basis of independent action and the next step.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Ecological evolutionary system

Source status: Public film library

People, nature and technology are considered in one context. The film offers a vision of gradually improving decisions through observation, experience and care for the environment.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

How to develop the territory in such a way as to improve people’s lives and preserve its natural basis?

Imagine an ecological evolutionary system — the concept of joint development of man, nature and technology.

At the heart of this idea is living space.

The settlement, fields, forest, river, workshops and knowledge of people are considered interlinked.

Each decision is evaluated by its consequences for the entire environment.

The environmental approach begins with an understanding of relationships.

Soil condition affects water and plants.

Living organisms are involved in natural processes.

Therefore, it is important to take into account local conditions and preserve the diversity of life.

Evolution here means the gradual improvement of decisions through experience.

Observe, select an action, check the result and make changes.

Such a cycle helps to learn in practice and timely notice mistakes.

People are involved in defining the tasks of their territory.

Residents, researchers, manufacturers and professionals agree on what needs to be preserved, what to restore and what changes are really useful.

A practical start can be one area: the river bank, degraded soil or public green space.

First, they study its condition, causes of problems and limitations.

Then, appropriate recovery measures are selected.

The result is estimated by the observed changes.

These can be indicators of water, soil condition, species diversity, resource consumption and human participation.

For comparison, baseline data and repeated measurements are needed.

Technology is a tool for this work.

Sensors help to observe, digital maps - to compare data, engineering solutions - to solve specific problems.

When choosing, the resource costs, maintenance and impact of the equipment itself are taken into account.

Cooperation links knowledge and performance.

One team investigates, the other designs, the third does the work.

General rules help to agree on resources, responsibilities and conditions for verification of the result.

Education makes experience accessible.

At the local site, you can learn to observe nature, work with data, master the craft and transfer skills.

Learning is linked to the real challenges of the community.

The first pilot is built around one clear goal.

Record the initial state.

Coordinate actions and accountability.

Perform a limited phase.

Compare the result and decide what to continue, change or stop.

Successful experience can be considered for other territories, each time checking local conditions.

The system develops through feedback, cooperation and the accumulation of proven knowledge.

Ecological evolutionary system.

Watching.

Restore.

Develop.

SFERA — A World Without Borders.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

SPECZASHCHITA — cooperative platform

Source status: Public film library

An in-depth introduction to the architecture of the cooperative platform, its areas of work and proposed pilots. At its centre is a clear path from initiative to joint work.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Big challenges begin with a common need.

But for an idea to become a workable solution, it needs people, knowledge, resources and clear responsibility.

SPECZASHCHITA is a cooperative collaborative execution platform.

Its design model connects science, manufacturing, territories and communities around a specific outcome.

The path is simple: identify the need, gather participants, coordinate resources, complete the project and transfer the result to operation.

At each stage, it is important to understand who is responsible for the work and how its quality is checked.

In the overall architecture, EQUILIBRIUM is responsible for surveillance and analytics.

The field helps to bring together needs, initiatives and participants.

ECO-PPA sets the resource, economic and contractual framework.

SPECZASHCHITA organizes cooperation of performers.

The materials of the platform are allocated nineteen directions.

Strategy, project office, law and financial preparation form the basis of joint work.

Technological directions cover energy, environmental solutions, water and soils, agro-industry, materials, construction and infrastructure.

Digital registries, scientific testing, metrology, and security help link decisions to data and evidence.

Logistics, education, social programs and partnerships ensure people’s participation and resource movement.

For the first project, the necessary functions are selected.

It is not necessary to create all nineteen units at once.

The focus is on the specific task, the team and the measurable result.

Three links have been proposed as possible pilots.

The ecomodule combines the technological task, energy and measurement.

Its parameters and usefulness will be tested on the selected object.

Living territory links water, soil, agricultural production and observation.

The competence workshop combines product manufacturing, testing and practical training of people.

Each pilot starts with a passport initiative.

It records the need, participants, stages, estimates, risks and acceptance criteria.

Resources and obligations are agreed before work begins.

A member of the cooperative, a project participant and a user of the platform are different roles.

The terms of participation, rights and responsibilities are determined by the relevant documents and treaties.

Enterprises can offer a task, developers - technology, territories - a platform, educational partners - team training.

The first step is a substantive dialogue and the choice of one joint project.

You have a model of development and proposals for cooperation.

The presented directions and pilots require separate coordination and confirmation of readiness.

SPECZASHCHITA.

From a common need to a joint result.

Let’s start with one task.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Village Council — video invitation

Source status: Public film library

Invitation to talk about the future of rural areas: local initiatives, cooperation and exchange of experience. The forum program is presented as a draft for discussion.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The future of the village begins with concrete solutions.

The second and third October two thousand twenty-sixth year in Moscow is scheduled for the forum of the Agrarian-Industrial Union "The Village of Russia - Food Security and the Revival of Industry".

The forum "Selsovet" invites you to a professional conversation about the development of farms and rural areas.

The draft program includes household income, loans and seasonal expenses, cooperation, domestic equipment, processing, rules for working on land, personnel and infrastructure.

Round tables are planned for the second October.

The third is plenary discussion and work on the resolution.

We invite farmers, producers, specialists and all those who work for the development of the village.

Prepare a case, project or proposal.

Specify the main figures: what hinders the work, what solution you offer and what result it can give.

Show the experience of your farm or territory, which can be shared with colleagues.

Moscow, second and third October.

Details of participation are with the organizers.

"Selsovet".

From discussion to working together.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

FENIX — Address to the People

Source status: Public film library

An inspiring address about personal choice and the possibility of acting together. Ten thematic parts form a vision of people’s self-development.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

FENIX.

Appeal to people.

The evolutionary system.

People!

Each of us knows what it means to survive difficulties and to seek strength to move on.

FENIX image of this ability: to revive, preserving experience and opening up to the new.

We propose to start with what is available to everyone: to learn, to create, to help each other and to be responsible for their decisions.

The evolutionary system begins with respect for man.

With the right to ask questions, to think independently, to participate in common affairs and to influence what concerns one's own life.

Our differences can be a source of knowledge.

The experience of others helps us to see things that we have not noticed before.

Cooperation allows you to solve tasks that one person can not.

Let the words be confirmed by deeds: by the knowledge imparted, by the aid given, by the promise fulfilled.

Let the general solutions be clear, and the results open for verification.

The future is made up of our actions.

You can start today.

FENIX.

Rebirth begins with us.

Published files

Films and performances · Card and available sources

A personal AI for everyone

Source status: Public film library

A brief look at personal AI as an assistant in everyday tasks, learning and work. Technology is presented through its potential for human development.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

This film has no published subtitles or transcript. Only its description and a video link are provided; the full spoken text is not included in the compilation.

Open on the site

Published files

  • Film (MP4)
    https://speczashchita.com/media/films/personal-ai.mp4

Films and performances · Full published text

Transport of the New Order

Source status: Public film library

An inspiring vision of transport that connects cities and villages, saves time and makes everyday life more accessible. The film presents a concept for a possible future.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Imagine a morning where you don’t have to fight the road.

You leave the house and know: the right route is nearby, the transfer is understandable, and the trip leaves strength for the most important thing - for life.

Transport of the New Order is a vision of a future in which movement serves people.

Where distance does not take away the opportunity to study, work, take care of loved ones and choose what will be today.

In such a city it is convenient to walk.

You can safely cross the street, ride a bike, get on the bus with a baby stroller.

Accessibility becomes a common device environment: from the threshold of the house to the final stop.

Public transport comes often, routes are connected, and information is clear to everyone.

Even those without a smartphone.

A personal car remains a choice, and a full life is available without it.

And this future continues beyond the city border.

The village also needs a reliable way to the doctor, school, work and railway station.

Smaller settlements should remain part of the common space of opportunity.

Between the cities are convenient trains and coordinated transfers.

A trip can be a time for reading, talking, or relaxing.

Meeting with relatives ceases to seem a difficult expedition, which has to be postponed again and again.

Behind this simplicity is a lot of work: thoughtful infrastructure, affordable stops, timely repairs, respect for the work of drivers, engineers and dispatchers.

The future consists of new solutions and daily reliability.

Technologies help to notice overloads, coordinate routes, save energy and prevent malfunctions.

Their value is measured by quite human things: how long it was possible to save, how calmer the road has become for those who have opened an previously inaccessible opportunity.

Delivery of goods also becomes part of the overall plan.

Fewer flights, more convenient supplies, quieter residential streets.

Environmental friendliness takes into account the entire path of transport: production, energy sources, maintenance, repair and further use of materials.

The main question is how people live.

Can a child safely get to school?

Can an elderly person visit their friends on their own?

Does the family have time to be together?

Transport of the New Order begins with this care.

It connects cities and villages, generations and opportunities.

It gives people time and freedom of movement.

The road helps to live.

SFERA — A World Without Borders.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Clothing of the New Order

Source status: Public film library

Smart fabrics, interchangeable modules and personal style in a conceptual vision of future clothing. The film invites viewers to consider materials and technology through everyday human experience.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

What will be the clothes if technology learns to adapt to our rhythm of life?

Imagine a possible future.

Smart fabrics help regulate heat and air exchange, and replaceable layers allow you to prepare for changes in the weather.

A well-thought-out cut leaves freedom of movement: on the road, at work, on a walk.

Light parts are combined into a wardrobe for different tasks.

The built-in electronics are almost invisible.

The touch includes soft lighting or heating.

Management is in the hands of man.

The element was worn out - it can be replaced.

There is a new task - to add a module.

Update the item while maintaining its basis.

Technology is becoming a part of personal style.

Color, silhouette and combinations you choose.

New Order clothing is our vision for a future where convenience meets freedom and innovation serves everyday life.

Clothes of the New Order.

SFERA — A World Without Borders.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

White Paper of Shared Destiny

Source status: Public film library

A concept of a shared future in which culture, knowledge and care for the living world form a unified picture of cooperation.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The White Paper of Shared Destiny is a project about bringing together human dignity, care for the living Earth and the development of a constructive civilisation.

The initiator of the concept is Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich, Falcon Equilibris.

We have a working version for discussion and preparation of practical tests.

Its central question is simple: how to turn a shared image of the future into concerted action, followed by understandable, verifiable improvements in life?

At the heart of the book is a person’s daily life: access to water, food, knowledge, safe housing, assistance and decent work. One need often requires the involvement of multiple services. Therefore, it is proposed to link their actions with a common life path. Each program has three questions: who is better, what has changed and how is it confirmed?

The average figure is supplemented by an understanding of how the result is distributed among people.

The moral foundations are laid down in the sixteen Cones, and the general obligations are laid down in the nineteen articles of the Covenant of One Heaven. Among the core ideas are life, dignity, freedom, responsibility, reciprocity, diversity and verifiability.

These are the copyright principles of collaboration.

They retain the human right to choose their own path, to participate voluntarily and to challenge decisions. Caring for children, future generations and the biosphere becomes a condition for evaluating any proposed project.

The practical chain begins with a need.

Participants agree on what change is considered useful, fix the initial state, choose a solution and confirm resources.

Then they do the work, check the result and update the overall picture. This is how a reproducible improvement cycle appears.

Responsibility accompanies every transition: we know who made the decision, who is executing, who checks and what needs to be corrected if expectations are not confirmed.

New experience becomes the basis for the next action.

The book proposes to consider any initiative simultaneously through three Spheres: man and communities; biosphere and territory; knowledge and civilization. For example, water supply is related to a family's access to water, the state of the source, and the reliability of the technology.

The image of the planetary lotus helps to see these connections.

The crystal seven hundred and forty-one defines the structure of the description of tasks through the spheres, directions and fields of the passport, preserving the distinction between symbolic and practical accounting.

Nineteen areas combine specific areas of work: health and rehabilitation, family, social support, water, climate, soil, food, work, education and science.

Other areas cover energy, production, housing, transportation, data, finance, culture, governance, and peaceful cooperation.

A single project can connect several areas.

For each, a human need, an expected change, and connections to overall balances are defined. The proposed classifier will have to be agreed with participants and source programs.

Nineteen balances show the state of the system and the consequences of decisions.

Water requires energy, repair requires materials and means, and new service requires labor and competence. Therefore, the improvement in one area is checked along with the load on others. Comparable supplies and flows are taken into account for water, energy and money. Health, culture and education require indicators of health and quality. Different results retain their own units and an understandable method of evaluation.

A register of two hundred and sixty measuring positions is proposed for verification.

These are places for future passport indicators.

Needs, coverage, quality, timing, availability and other characteristics are assessed. Each measurement requires a source, method, period, and known constraints. The comparison before and after is accompanied by a check of the possible causes of the change.

A person should understand the record of himself, be able to get an explanation and report an error. These rules make the result verifiable.

In the proposed architecture EQUILIBRIUM responsible for monitoring, coordination and feedback. SFERA It helps people and organizations to interact and negotiate roles. Eco-peep-ey links resources with confirmed commitments. SPECZASHCHITA organize the execution within the limits of contracts and powers. The accounting team ensures the comparability of the data, and independent verification evaluates the result. Together, these functions should connect the solution, its provision, work in the field and the subsequent confirmation of a useful change.

Management involves a meeting of participants, direction councils and experts, a project office and independent review.

For each action, clear authority, responsible and confirmed resources are needed. Funding is associated with a specific job and the conditions for its acceptance. The participant retains a voice, access to explanation and the possibility of exit. Risks are received by the owner and a pre-established procedure. In case of threat of harm or inability to verify the essential result, the relevant work should be suspended.

The first pilot, "Second Breath", is dedicated to the independence of man.

It offers to link professional rehabilitation, accessible environment, technical means, training and support of daily activities.

Participation is voluntary, medical decisions are left to authorized specialists.

The result is assessed through agreed changes in the functions and availability of assistance.

Initial assessment, team capabilities, and surveillance rules are required prior to the start.

Participant feedback and unwanted events are included in the overall verification picture along with improvements.

The second pilot is Water and Water Balance. At one site, it is proposed to check how maintenance and reduction of losses affect the water supply.

We need uniform accounting boundaries, devices, comparable periods and a log of the work performed. The expected change is assessed together with water quality and useful supply. Energy, costs and infrastructure are also taken into account. The replacement of the measurement technique is considered separately so that its impact is not mistaken for real savings.

The third pilot - "Living soil and food."

The selected site management practices are suggested to be compared with the initial state and, where possible, with a comparable site. Changes in soil, products, resource consumption and risks are checked. The observations record the sampling location, season, weather and processing method. Each practice receives a separate assessment.

This allows us to discuss its benefits based on data and take into account the limitations before expanding the application in other territories.

The fourth pilot, the City of Knowledge and Cooperation, connects the educational platform, researchers and production participants around a useful task. Criteria - the mastered skill and the work done for the understandable user. The fifth, "Ideal workflow", checks common identifiers, versions of documents, decisions and obligations. Participants should quickly restore the basis of the decision, find relevant information and correct the error.

For both pilots, the boundaries, data and conditions for the acceptance of the result are determined in advance.

The road map is designed for three hundred and sixty-five days after a separate decision to launch.

The first month is the coordination of participants and borders.

The next two are baseline measurements, design, and assurance.

Then there is limited execution, validation of results and consolidation of experience.

The transition between stages depends on the confirmed conditions: security, data quality and fulfillment of obligations.

At the end of the cycle, a decision is made to continue, change or complete the program, and the book is updated.

The white paper offers an open framework for cooperation.

You can start with a specific pilot, agreeing on his tasks and rules of verification. The next steps are to choose the need and the territory, gather participants, clarify roles, confirm resources and fix the initial state. The invitation to discuss is addressed to researchers, specialists, communities and potential partners. Common responsibility manifests itself in consistent work: freely negotiate, verify the result, correct mistakes, and keep a useful experience for the next step.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

World Builder

Source status: Public film library

From a shared vision to action at different scales: the film shows how to connect personal initiative, an area and a unified development plan.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Designer of the World. The architecture of creation of man, society, nature and civilization.

How to turn the image of the desired future into a sequence of coordinated actions?

The concept of “EQUILIBRIUM” offers to start with a common goal, see the relationships and check each decision for real results.

We are used to looking at education, health, energy and the economy separately.

But in life they are connected. The new road changes the accessibility of schools and hospitals.

The energy project affects air, water and the cost of living.

Development requires seeing the whole picture.

In the center of the Designer is a person: his dignity, health, freedom of choice and ability. The eight foundations unite man, family, race, community, nature, culture, science and technology.

Any project is considered through its contribution to these foundations of life.

The main formula is this: everyone works for one plan.

One goal. A common coordinate system helps coordinate efforts.

At the same time, the participants retain their independence, local initiative and their own responsibility. Decisions are made where there is the necessary knowledge and competence.

Such architecture connects seven scales: a person, a family, a clan, a community, a territory, a country and a world.

There are challenges at each level. The overall plan shows how they are related, what resources are needed and who is responsible for the result.

The work cycle begins with a meaning: why do we act?

Then come the design, balance sheet negotiation and decision making.

After implementation, you need to measure changes, save the evidence and adjust the next step. So experience becomes new knowledge, and the plan develops with reality.

The basis of the agreement is nineteen related balances.

They cover society and health, nature and resources, production and infrastructure, knowledge and culture, economy, security and the interests of future generations. Each balance sheet requires indicators, data sources, allowable deviations and a responsible party.

Imagine an energy project. It is important to assess its capacity and cost, the reliability of the power supply to hospitals, the impact on water and land, staffing needs and long-term consequences. A nineteen-by-nineteen matrix helps record the connections and reveal where an improvement in one indicator may conceal harm to another.

A separate project receives a digital passport.

It describes the problem, expected change, resources, risks, participants, timing, and acceptance criteria. Each result must have an owner, each significant indicator - the source and method of verification.

The nine registers of the Thinking Stream link observations, meanings, classification, scenarios, decisions, actions, results, evidence, and connections. A single identifier allows you to trace the whole way: on the basis of what the decision was made, what was done and what effect is really confirmed.

The digital twin helps to compare scenarios and model dependencies between people, territories, resources, and projects. The Orion classification sets a general description language. These tools support the work of professionals.

People are responsible for meaningful decisions and their consequences.

The assessment of development retains several dimensions: health, knowledge, culture, ecology, economy and sustainability. Strengths are shown along with deficits and uncertainty. Execution is separated from independent verification, and people’s participation and work with their data require protection of rights and privacy.

The pilot of Safari Park - City of Knowledge is offered as a practical start.

In a limited area, it integrates the natural core, education, health, research, cultural heritage, energy, and digital infrastructure.

Here you can check the complete chain of the Constructor and prepare solutions for further development.

The first step is to fix the initial state.

Then run training programs on real-world tasks, organize environmental monitoring, describe energy reliability, collect a proven heritage collection, and link data. Success is determined by a confirmed improvement in several balances without a hidden deterioration in the rest.

The proposed start cycle is designed for ninety days.

Agree on the goal and participants first. Then describe the initial state, form and select pilot solutions, configure measurements and Archive.

After that, run the first cycle and submit a public review with the necessary adjustments.

The designer of the World is presented as a project concept.

The pilot’s territory, resources and parameters require further development.

Its principle is simple: to agree on a goal, to test a solution on a limited scale, to measure the effect and to extend only the confirmed result.

The future is created by common efforts - with respect for the person and responsibility to life.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Global balances: 1895–2025

Source status: Public film library

A historical overview of global balances invites us to explore long-term connections between resources, knowledge and centres of development.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Analysis of world balances. One hundred and thirty years: from one thousand eight hundred and ninety-fifth to two thousand twenty-fifth years.

From steam and steel to data, artificial intelligence and new responsibility for the future. This film is based on the concept of "EQUILIBRIUM".

His task is to see how people, resources, technology and quality of life are connected.

The authors propose to look at history through balance sheets: what society produces and consumes, what opportunities it creates and what obligations it leaves to future generations.

Profiles presented are qualitative analytical assessments.

They do not replace official statistics. Nineteen balance sheets and design tools are here considered as a method yet to be tested by data and pilots.

The first period is from the year one thousand eight hundred and ninety-fifth to the year one thousand nine hundred and fourteen.

Steam, steel, railways, electricity and the telegraph are expanding production and markets. The factory becomes a symbol of new strength.

But technical possibilities are growing against the backdrop of colonial dependence, social contradictions and rivalry of empires.

The lesson of this era: rising output alone does not ensure the sustainability of society.

From the year one thousand nine hundred and fourteen to the year one thousand nine hundred and forty-five, the world wars have changed the map and the structure of the economy. Oil, aviation, radio and the mobilization industry are accelerating technological change.

Huge resources are being devoted to destruction.

Behind the military results are human losses, devastated territories and interrupted development.

The price of strategic error goes far beyond one budget and one generation.

The next segment is from the thousand nine hundred and forty-fifth to the thousand nine hundred and seventies.

Cities are being rebuilt, roads, power plants, schools and hospitals are being built.

International institutions, nuclear energy and space programs are developing.

In industrial centers, opportunities for education and everyday well-being are expanding.

At the same time, the demand for energy and raw materials increases.

Recovery shows the power of long-term investment in people and infrastructure.

The period from nineteen seventy to nineteen ninety-one is treated as the late phase of the Cold War. Oil shocks, computing systems, satellites and military-industrial complexes change the conditions of competition.

The technology race is taking more money.

The environmental consequences and cost of block confrontation become part of the overall balance.

The advantage is determined not only by the amount of resources, but also by the ability to turn knowledge into working systems.

The period from one thousand nine hundred and ninety-first to two thousand and twentieth year - globalization and digital transition. Container logistics, the Internet, financial markets and platform companies connect remote production and consumers.

China is rapidly increasing its industrial scale.

Supply chains increase efficiency but create dependencies.

The concentration of data and critical production means that a failure in one node can affect many countries.

The authors call the years two thousand and twenty to two thousand and twenty-five the threshold of the New Order. The pandemic, sanctions, energy restructuring, artificial intelligence and climate risks make the question of resilience more acute. Where can reliable energy be obtained?

How to save water and soil? How to ensure health, knowledge and safety?

This name expresses the author’s vision of the transition, and not the generally accepted boundary of the historical era.

The general conclusion of the concept is that new sources of power do not cancel the previous ones.

The industry continues to need raw materials and energy, and the digital economy continues to need equipment, electricity, and people. Therefore, the volume of gross domestic product is useful to supplement the indicators of health, education, the state of nature, the reliability of infrastructure and trust.

It is important to see both the result of growth and its long-term price.

Twelve contours are proposed for this analysis.

The first six are population, energy, industry, finance, transportation, and science.

Six others are technology, food, water, ecology, culture and safety.

Each circuit answers its own question, uses its own data sources and helps to see connections with others.

For example, the availability of water affects both the health, yield and living conditions of the territory.

Nineteen balances make this picture more detailed.

The natural resource part includes energy, water, land, food, raw materials and environmental balances.

It assesses the availability of resources, the load on natural systems and the possibility of recovery. Not every resource is renewable.

Therefore, the preservation of water and fertility requires some solutions, and the use of mineral raw materials - others.

The economic and technological part combines industrial, transport and logistics, financial, scientific and technological and information and digital balances. The human part is demographic, educational, balance of health and quality of life, as well as cultural and semantic. The system is complemented by management balance, security, international cooperation and intergenerational balance.

The latter raises the question: what opportunities and limitations does our decision convey to people of the future?

In the materials, Russia, China, the United States and Europe are represented through different profiles of power. For Russia, the authors allocate resources, territory, water, energy and scientific schools.

Among the restrictions are demographics, technological localization and infrastructure connectivity. For China, the focus is on manufacturing, infrastructure and scaling speed.

Risks are associated with demographics, energy demand, environmental burden and external markets.

The United States profile highlights finance, universities, digital platforms, and entrepreneurship.

Among the risks are the debt burden, social polarization and the state of infrastructure. The European profile links strengths to standards, culture and quality of life, and constraints to energy costs and industrial competitiveness.

These are generalizations of the authors: within each center, the differences are great, and the comparison requires comparable indicators for a particular year.

Multivariate assessment shows where there is strength, scarcity, and risk.

The concept proposes to compare the resource base, energy sustainability, scientific potential, quality of life, ecology and management. For each indicator, a source, a unit of measurement, a calculation method and a responsible one are required.

Without these conditions, a beautiful profile remains an illustration.

With them, it can be the basis for a verifiable decision.

The next tool is a nineteen by nineteen matrix.

Its purpose is to reflect the impact of one decision on different balances.

Take a conditional energy project. In addition to capacity and cost, it is necessary to assess water consumption, land use, production chains, jobs and reliability of supply.

Separately - maintenance costs and future decommissioning of equipment.

This is how you see the effects that are not placed in one financial indicator.

The project is proposed to create a digital passport: purpose, initial data, limitations, responsible and measurable results. The archive of evidence should store the sources and bases of the conclusions. Computational GRID is conceived as a scenario analysis environment.

It can help to compare options under given assumptions.

But the model itself does not guarantee a correct forecast: the quality of the result depends on data, methodology and independent verification.

International cooperation in materials is considered as a possible way to combine different competencies. Resources, industry, research and infrastructure can complement each other.

However, such a scenario requires trust, verifiable data, agreed rules and respect for sovereignty. The benefits of cooperation should be assessed on specific projects, taking into account the interests of participants and restrictions on access to critical technologies.

The authors offer to test the method on pilots: the city of knowledge, the energy initiative "Eco-PIP-Y", the archive of heritage preservation and monitoring points of natural communities.

Each pilot needs a baseline, measurable effect, timelines and success criteria. Then compare the result with expectations.

The decision to scale should be based on observations and evidence, including identified limitations.

The plan of the first ninety days begins with a team, a single dictionary and a source map.

Then, indicators and profiles of power centers are collected, a matrix of inter-balance relations is developed. In the next step, a digital passport and an archive of evidence are created. The final stage is the report and the decision on piloting. This is a plan to prepare the method for verification; confirmation of long-term effects will require further observation.

One hundred and thirty years of history is an occasion to consider more carefully the consequences of our decisions. The main idea of EQUILIBRIUM: development should be evaluated through the reproduction of life, knowledge, energy, water, land and human dignity. Analyzing the past becomes useful when it helps to ask verifiable questions about the future — and answer them with responsible actions.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Seven Gates to a Sustainable World

Source status: Public film library

Dialogue, mutual guarantees and post-conflict reconstruction are presented as pillars of the proposed model of sustainable peace.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

How can we stop the war and not pass it on to the next generation?

The New World Order project proposes to start with one goal: to preserve human life and dignity, the security of peoples and freedom of development.

The initiator of the concept is Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich.

This is a proposal for a system of conflict prevention, dialogue and recovery. Its implementation depends on the parties to the conflict, legal powers and verifiable guarantees.

The project is based on two transitions. “Change of Density” means a change in the quality of a relationship: from fear to trust, backed by verification; from dominance to cooperation; from revenge to restoration and responsibility.

"Measurement change" expands the concept of safety.

The calculation includes the life, law, health, economy, culture, ecology and future of children. The document contains nineteen interrelated balances of the world.

Both terms describe a management concept.

The road is called the “Seven Gates of Sustainable Peace”.

The first is to protect people: to ensure access to medicine, water and humanitarian aid, to preserve hospitals, schools and safe routes.

The second is to stop the escalation: establish hotlines, prevent incidents, and coordinate local silence regimes.

The third is to check the facts: to compare independent sources, to note uncertainty and to preserve the right to object.

The fourth is to open a permanent dialogue with the participation of authorized parties and professional mediators.

The fifth is to secure guarantees. Each obligation must have a responsible, time-bound, resource-based, vetting, and clear procedure for responding to violations.

The sixth is to restore life: to demine territories, to return water and electricity, housing, work, education and justice.

The seventh is to create a common future through joint scientific, infrastructure, cultural and economic projects.

It is proposed to link these tasks through the MetaProject Collective Security Council. It should involve States and regional organizations, community representatives, independent experts and a professional secretariat.

It is a design coordination platform.

It operates within the framework of law and retains the powers of existing institutions, including the United Nations.

The digital basis is nine registers: from observations and scenarios to actions, results and evidence. Artificial intelligence helps to analyze the consequences.

Decisions on people’s rights and the use of force remain with the authorized person.

It is proposed to start with the pilot "Contour of Peace - a thousand".

Three areas: border tensions, internal polarization and post-conflict reconstruction.

The scale of each is up to a thousand objects of observation, obligations, routes or projects.

During the first hundred days, the plan is to create a working group, secure communication channels, risk maps and the first verifiable commitments.

The result is proposed to be measured specifically: how quickly the aid is restored, agreements are fulfilled, water, medicine, schools and work are returned.

The pilot checks the system's operability; ending a particular war cannot be guaranteed in advance.

The first step is a founding working group, three pilot outlines and independent verification of the result. One goal is to preserve human life and dignity. And pass on to future generations a planet without war as an inheritance.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

ORION 22:22

Source status: Public film library

An introduction to the ORION 22:22 concept: a shared language of classification helps connect ideas, projects and a thoughtful choice of actions.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

One planet. Lots of knowledge, people and opportunities.

Orion twenty-two is a concept that proposes to link them for the sake of coordinated development.

Today, data, projects and solutions often exist separately.

Orion's idea is to create common rules of engagement to see goals, resources, responsibility, and consequences in a single picture.

At the heart of the New Order are human quality of life, the preservation of nature, and knowledge that helps people act. It is proposed that success be assessed through real changes and confirmed results.

The meaning determines why and for whom we act.

Knowledge collects verified data. The solution compares the options.

The action connects the performer, the resource and the term.

Memory preserves the result and its evidence.

The working language of the system is the twenty-two axis of classification.

They help to describe people, territories, resources, technologies, risks and outcomes, while preserving the connections between participants and the independence of each.

Nineteen Human Standards describe the conditions of development: health, education, safety, culture, and other opportunities. It assesses the accessibility and quality of the environment, not the value of individuals.

The project or territory is proposed to be considered in several dimensions: from quality of life and nature to science and cooperation.

Each indicator should have a source, method of calculation and limits of applicability.

Related registries and the Archive retain the origin of the data, the versions of the solutions, and the validation of the results. Computing infrastructure helps to test scenarios. The responsibility for choice remains with the person.

Safari Park - City of Knowledge: An area where nature, education, and research connect to a registry and development profile. Here the model can be tested on specific tasks.

Other proposed areas are water monitoring, heritage preservation and the exchange of permitted data. Each pilot must have their own goals, participants and verifiable result.

The initial plan is designed for ninety days: to coordinate dictionaries, collect the initial data, create a registry and a pilot panel, check the calculations. The decision to expand is based on the results of this work.

The next step is to coordinate the model and test it on one pilot.

Orion's value lies in solutions that help improve the life of the territory and preserve opportunities for future generations.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

People and health

Source status: Public film library

A short film about prevention, accessible primary care and attention to the conditions that support human health.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The first direction of the New World Order is “Man and Health”.

It is proposed to make health the main criterion for the quality of the environment and solutions: to accompany a person from prevention and early identification of risks to treatment, rehabilitation and return to work.

The main modules are a health passport, preventive routes, accessible primary care and telemedicine.

Comprehensive rehabilitation includes prosthetics and the Second Breath program.

Medical solutions are linked to nutrition, water and air quality, working conditions and urban environments.

Checkpoints are the duration of a healthy life, preventable health losses, time of access to care and the effectiveness of rehabilitation.

The first pilot, Healthy Territory, combines prevention, nutrition, environment and rehabilitation in one municipality. The beginning of the work is the initial data, the responsible owner and the unified passport of the result.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Second Breath

Source status: Public film library

The film centres on a path to regaining independence: rehabilitation, assistive technologies and coordinated involvement of specialists and loved ones.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Back to normal life. Independently move, communicate, learn, work, be close to loved ones.

It is with the personal goal of a person that the concept of an integrated rehabilitation system and the Second Breath program begins.

The initiator of the concept is Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich.

The proposed system combines medical rehabilitation, social and psychological support, education, professional recovery and an accessible environment.

The general guideline is the functional result achieved by a person and the quality of his daily life.

The route begins with an assessment of the state, opportunities, life circumstances and personal priorities of the person. Measurable goals are formulated together with specialists and the family.

On this basis, an individual program is drawn up with understandable stages, deadlines and responsible ones.

A personal navigator helps to coordinate the work of the team and transitions between organizations.

Support should continue at home, in school and in the workplace.

The digital passport integrates goals, assignments, consents, and outcomes, preserving a history of change and delimiting access to data.

The scientific and technological part of the program connects man, materials, design, production and service. The Institute of Mechanical Engineering named after Bladonravov of the Russian Academy of Sciences is proposed in the documents as a head scientific integrator.

This is a project for expert review and approval.

Prostheses, orthoses and rehabilitation devices are proposed to be designed for specific functions and real conditions of use.

In one process, a doctor, an engineer, a prosthetist, a rehabilitator and the user himself work.

Design, customization, and learning are all considered part of a single life cycle.

The material is chosen for the task: strength, mass, wear resistance, comfort and conditions of contact with the body. Composites, alloys, polymers, technical ceramics and synthetic crystals occupy different places in this architecture.

The application of each solution requires appropriate calculations, tests and confirmation of suitability.

Digital twins and monitoring are provided as tools for modeling and supporting solutions. They link data about a person and a product, help to check load scenarios and track changes.

Responsibility for clinical and engineering solutions remains with specialists.

An album of nineteen reference forms has been prepared for traceability.

It covers the human purpose, technical task, materials, production, testing, risks, product issuance, training and service.

This is a draft common information core to be harmonized with the mandatory documentation.

A separate direction is the environment of life: room, mobility route, territory, water and air quality. The biocenous passport connects the environmental conditions with the operation and completion of the product life cycle.

Rehabilitation is considered together with the space in which a person lives every day.

The model "Man - Bank" offers to fix the personal route of the target resource for services, equipment and support. This is a personalized financing project that requires separate legal and financial work.

Its task is to make the needs, obligations of performers and the use of resources transparent.

In the general architecture, "EQUILIBRIUM" is responsible for analytics and resource balance, "Sphere" - for the interaction of participants, "Eco-P-P-E" - for project agreements, "SPECZASHCHITA" - for the organization of execution.

Their joint work is supposed to be checked in the pilot.

The proposed first step is ninety days of preparation, then a pilot in three territories on five to seven priority routes. Prior to launch, you need a team, agreed rules, a resource model and evaluation criteria.

The decision to expand should be based on the results of the pilot.

Success is proposed to be assessed by independence, achievement of personal goals, participation in family and professional life, reliability of products and continuity of support.

Second Breath is the concept of a system in which science, technology, and the organization of help work for the sake of a person’s life outcome.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Unified Lineage System

Source status: Public film library

Family memory becomes the starting point for continuity, mutual assistance and projects shared across generations.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

What will we leave to the next generations? Family history, knowledge, skill - or only scattered traces?

The EQUILIBRIUM Unified Lineage System proposes connecting the memory of the past with the possibilities of the future.

It is the concept of a voluntary environment where individuals, families, mentors and communities together preserve heritage, learn and create useful projects. Here the family is a circle of continuity and mutual responsibility, open to everyone.

It is based on one goal: to unleash human abilities, strengthen the family and create a better future. The overall plan links goals, resources, timelines and responsibilities. At the same time, everyone retains the freedom of choice and the right to leave the system.

The Heritage Preservation Archive helps preserve photographs, letters, documents, languages and crafts. Each material has a source, history, and access rules. Family traditions are kept together with the context, and the confirmed facts are based on evidence.

The Unified University is conceived as a network of schools, universities, museums, laboratories and masters.

It helps to build a continuous educational trajectory - from children's curiosity to the profession and the transfer of experience. You can learn and be a teacher at any age.

In the schools of reality, knowledge is put into action.

Participants explore nature, master crafts, explore the history of their place, create technology and help people.

Mentors support the path from the first attempt to self-mastery.

Carousel connects plans with teams and resources.

The project goes from a task to a verifiable result.

Chronicles preserve decisions, achievements and lessons so that the next generation can continue what they started. Thus memory becomes knowledge, and action becomes a new heritage.

The system connects seven levels: person, family, kind, community, territory, country, and world. Caring for children and elders, culture, work, land and home form a common development environment.

The city of knowledge is conceived as a meeting place for education and practice.

Nineteen linked balances help to see the consequences of decisions: how the development of one sphere affects others.

ORION offers general navigation on knowledge, projects and results.

The indicators have yet to be tested in the pilot; their task is to help human development.

Trust begins with clear rules. Participation voluntarily.

Origin does not give privileges. Private data is disclosed only with the consent of the owner. Health care is based on evidence-based practices, and a participant can challenge the assessment and retain control over their materials.

The first proposed step is the pilot "Rod - University - Territory".

Thirty families, ten mentors, four Reality Schools, one Archive, and four project teams. It is planned to start with family chronicles, maps of the territory, a skills workshop and a natural or social project.

Network expansion is offered after security and benefit testing for participants. The main result is the ability of each generation to know more, live more worthy and leave a useful legacy.

The EQUILIBRIUM Unified Lineage System. Preserving our roots — opening up the future.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Education: One University

Source status: Public film library

A vision of a personal learning path in which mentoring, practice and knowledge sharing help you move towards your own endeavour.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Education is the movement of life. It begins with the child’s curiosity and continues in the profession, creativity, mentoring and transfer of experience.

The New World Order Project. Education” proposes to link these stages into a single system.

Its benchmark is the disclosure of human dignity and abilities, the preservation of culture and nature, the development of knowledge and technology for good.

“Everyone is working on a plan. One Goal” is the formula of the concept. The overall plan links objectives, roles, resources and results. At the same time, the participants retain their independence, freedom of thought and personal responsibility.

At the center of the system is continuous education.

School, university, first profession, retraining and mentoring become parts of a personal trajectory. Everyone has their own interests, abilities, projects and pace of development.

One University is designed as a distributed network.

It can include families, schools, campuses, businesses, museums, laboratories and digital venues. The territory becomes a place of learning when there is a mentor, a real task, safe conditions and an understandable result.

The Heritage Preservation Archive helps to transfer knowledge across generations.

It stores sources, authorship, versions, and decision history.

This is the basis of trust in the materials used by students, researchers and teams.

Reality schools connect learning with action.

In nature, it is the study of water, soil and ecosystems.

In production - work with materials, energy and robotics.

In society - culture, family, cooperation and care for the environment.

We will present a training project for the restoration of the local stream.

Participants explore the territory, collect data, discuss the decision with residents and do the work under the guidance of mentors. Then compare the result with the initial state. This is how knowledge makes practical sense.

Superclass footage in this concept is people who are able to see the whole, assemble teams and bring complex tasks to fruition.

The basis of training is system thinking, ethics, work with data and proven contribution.

The frame carousel allows you to try different roles: researcher, engineer, organizer, heritage keeper, mentor.

The cycle includes training, practice, result protection and feedback.

The next step is based on the experience gained.

Chronicles preserve the path of man, project and territory, including errors and conclusions. Calendars set the rhythm of classes, expeditions and defenses. Cosmograms are described in the materials as a symbolic cultural language; scientific verification retains an independent meaning.

The basis EQUILIBRIUM combines nineteen balances, twenty-two axes of the Orion system and two hundred and sixty indicators. This is the proposed evaluation architecture.

Measurement methods and target values still require verification on the pilot's baseline data.

The meaning of assessment is to see the impact of education on knowledge, health, culture and the state of nature. Improvements in one indicator should take into account the impact on others. Each result needs a clear source of data and independent verification.

Digital tools and artificial intelligence can help to search for knowledge, model options and link projects. Decisions that affect a person should remain understandable, and personal data should remain protected.

A practical start is offered through the City of Knowledge and the pilot of EDU - zero one.

At its core are an archive collection, two Reality Schools, three educational programs, a frame carousel, a digital passport, and a Purpose Council.

The first ninety days are allocated for training: team, sites, source data, methods, calendar, budget and expert evaluation. The result should be an agreed launch package for the first training cycle. Expansion of the network is provided in stages, on the horizon of three to five years.

Voluntary participation, the right to make mistakes, open methods and independent examination are the necessary conditions of this model.

Its quality will be assessed by real changes in the lives of people and territories.

The archive has a legacy. One university connects knowledge.

Reality schools test them with life. People turn experience into creative solutions.

Education is the movement of life. Man.

Society. Planet. The future.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Poverty alleviation

Source status: Public film library

The film presents a project approach to supporting families: from a clear route to assistance to a stable income and freedom of choice.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

What needs to change to lift families out of poverty?

One payment is not enough. The money goes to rent, medicine and debt.

It is difficult to get to work, there is no one to leave the child.

A related system of causes is found for some difficulties.

The concept of the “New World Order - Combating Poverty” combines assistance to the individual, the family and the development of the territory. The initiator is Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich. This is an interagency program.

Its timing, standards and financial proportions will have to be checked and clarified on the pilot territory.

The main idea is to restore the viability of the family as a whole: security, affordable services, sustainable income, rights, social ties and savings. There are three stages: protection, sustainability, development. Emergency assistance is provided without preconditions. The further route is consistent with the person and takes into account his life situation.

The programme distinguishes between critical poverty, long-term poverty, high vulnerability and temporary crisis. Lack of food or lodging requires immediate protection. With a long-term deficit, a recovery plan is needed. When the family is already coping, but it does not have a margin of safety, it is necessary to prevent a return to the crisis.

Responsibility is shared between the individual, the family, the community, the territory and the state.

The fifth level includes international cooperation.

The family sets goals. The community provides close services, the territory connects resources and jobs, the state fixes guarantees and equalizes opportunities.

Nineteen related balances are offered for diagnosis.

The first four are dignity and life security, income, nutrition, housing and communal sustainability. It is important to understand whether the resources are sufficient after the mandatory expenses, whether the place of residence is safe and whether the basic needs are closed every day.

The following four balances are health and rehabilitation, family and children, education and competence, culture and psychological resilience.

They take into account access to treatment, school life, care load, skills and social connections. Support helps the whole family to live and develop.

Four other areas cover employment and decent work, entrepreneurship and cooperation, finance and debt, assets and savings. It assesses the stability of earnings, the strength of obligations and the ability to create a reserve.

The work should improve the budget and correspond to the capabilities of the person.

Next comes water and sanitation, energy, transport and mobility, digital access.

Complete the system of law, documents and security; territory and ecology; data, management and responsibility.

The directions are considered together: safe housing helps to simultaneously improve health, access to work and the family budget.

The beginning of the route is a guaranteed viability package.

It includes nutrition, safe lodging, water and hygiene, emergency medical care, basic energy, documents and communication, legal protection, child development, coordinator and transitional income. This minimum should not depend on bureaucratic skills.

To get emergency protection, a person does not need to first find employment, undergo training or collect a full package of documents.

For those who are unable to work because of age, health or caring for loved ones, sustainability is ensured by guarantees and services. Material difficulties should not become a reason for the separation of the child from the family.

The proposed standard begins with first aid in the first four hours. Safe accommodation and coordinator per day.

Within seventy-two hours — a preliminary family balance.

Until the thirtieth day, the recovery route is agreed.

Every ninety days, real changes and risk of return are checked.

This is the project target date.

You can contact us through a social service, school, medical organization, multifunctional center, portal or mobile team.

Any entry starts the general process. The coordinator connects the services, resources and obligations of the agencies. The family chooses goals, and each action has a responsible and deadline.

The first salary does not mean the end of support.

Safe housing, affordable treatment, continuous education of children and feasible debts are needed. In the family card, the reference points are income that is stable for at least six months, and a reserve for at least three months of expenses or a protected family asset.

As income increases, assistance is proposed to be reduced gradually.

The first earnings should help to form a safety margin.

Costs of travel, childcare, medicines and equipment are counted as transition costs. In case of difficulties, the route is revised, and the basic guarantees remain.

The economic part combines training with the real needs of the territory: repair, food production, care, agriculture, environmental restoration and digital services.

Paid start-up work with a mentor and short educational modules are offered. When choosing employment, safety, transport and family schedule are taken into account.

Cooperation gives access to general workshops, machinery, sales, accounting and logistics. Microgrants and mentoring help you get started.

Local purchases link orders, skills and assets of the territory.

This creates conditions for sustainable income of participants.

Funding is divided into five funds. The Guaranteed Viability Fund provides emergency protection and transitional income.

The Family Development Fund supports education, health, care and tools. The Territorial Solidarity Fund is responsible for housing, transport and infrastructure. Ongoing assistance and asset creation are accounted for separately.

The Employment and Cooperation Fund finances jobs, training, equipment and sales. The Return Prevention Fund supports savings, reserves and life-expectancy insurance. Private and charitable funds complement public guarantees. Access to basic protection should not depend on a charity competition.

The budget is calculated according to the needs of families, taking into account the infrastructure and risk reserve. In the initial scenario, thirty percent are directed to stabilization and transitional income, twenty to employment, training and cooperation, and fifteen to housing and communal sustainability.

Ten per cent of the scenario budget is allocated to each of health, family and territorial assets. Five per cent is allocated to data, management, legal protection and independent evaluation. All shares are refined after diagnosis.

Transparency shows which spending eliminates deficits and changes the causes of poverty.

The digital circuit links needs, resources, solutions and outcomes.

EQUILIBRIUM observes and balances, SFERA integrates needs and solutions, Eco-pe-pa connects resources and contracts, SPECZASHCHITA organizes cooperative execution. Nine registers record observations, meanings, classification, scenarios, decisions, actions, results, evidence, and connections.

Only the necessary data is collected, with informed consent.

A person should see his profile and the basis of decisions, correct mistakes and appeal. The algorithm cannot single-handedly refuse emergency assistance.

Human review and independent audit are provided.

Public reports are depersonalized.

It is proposed to check the model on the territory of up to one hundred thousand residents within thirty-six months. Priority is given to families with critical and multiple deficits. In the first thirty days, a headquarters and a responsibility card are formed, and diagnostics are carried out. For the first hundred days, a single entrance and an emergency guarantee must be earned.

Then family routes, employment, housing, infrastructure and savings develop. After the first year, it is expected to publish a reproducible standard: processes, standards, cost of the result and legal barriers.

The scaling horizon is marked from three to seven years.

The basis for the expansion is the confirmed stability of families and the protection of their rights.

Among the pilot's orientations are an emergency response of no more than four hours, a family balance of seventy-two hours, and proactive assignment of at least ninety percent of available measures after setting up data exchange.

Return to critical condition for twelve months after stabilization - no more than ten percent. These are planning indicators.

The result is proposed to be assessed on the sustainability of income, housing security, access to treatment, child development and the margin of safety of the family.

The verification is provided by an independent validator and a board of participants.

The main idea of the concept: a person does not have to prove that he is worthy of life.

The task of the system is to provide protection and help to gain independence.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Decent income and work

Source status: Public film library

Family budgets, decent work and time for care are considered together as conditions for a more stable and free life.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Decent income and work. Economic independence of the family.

A person can be busy all day and still not feel confident in the future.

If earnings are spent on mandatory expenses, travel and caring for loved ones, one record of employment is not enough.

It is important how work changes the daily life of the family.

Sergei Leonidovich Sokolov’s authored concept within EQUILIBRIUM and the New World Order addresses this task. It proposes connecting decent work, income, time for care, protection against risks and the creation of one’s own assets.

This is a project for discussion and verification in the pilot.

Decent work begins with an understandable contract, a safe workplace and respect for the person. You need predictable payments, a reasonable schedule, the opportunity to learn and influence the working conditions.

Employment should be compatible with the care of children, the elderly and one's own health.

Income in the concept is assessed through the family balance: how much remains after taxes and the necessary costs of housing, food, treatment, transport and care.

A rise in accrued wages makes sense when a family has more opportunities and less dependence on emergency loans.

Time is taken into account with money. Working hours, travel, training, care and recovery are all part of the same routine.

Therefore, affordable kindergarten, convenient transport or adaptation of the workplace can be a decisive condition for sustainable earnings.

For this purpose, a family economic passport is offered.

With the consent of the family, it connects income and expenses, skills, risks, reserve and selected goals.

The obligations of the system are fixed nearby: what services will be provided, in what time frame and who is responsible for the result.

The route begins with the removal of specific barriers.

One person needs documents and recovery.

The other is learning, tools, or help with child care.

Work, business and cooperation remain options for voluntary choice.

Training is offered to build under the confirmed demand: vacancy, order or project territory. This takes into account the experience already gained.

Practice, mentoring and recognition of skills should open the way to the next level of qualification and payment.

A special rule is a smooth reduction in transitional support.

The first increase in earnings should not lead to a sharp loss of assistance and deterioration of the marital status.

Transition conditions should be understood in advance, and the costs of travel, care and treatment should be taken into account.

The next step is safety. This is a reserve for unforeseen expenses, equipment, education, improvement of housing or a transparent share in the joint business. Cooperation can provide access to a common workshop, machinery, accounting and marketing.

The rights, contribution and distribution of the result should be clear to each participant.

The model identifies nineteen related balance sheets: from health and competencies to labor rights, debts, assets, and children’s prospects.

They help to see the causes of difficulties and to coordinate the actions of employers, social services, education and territorial operators.

The proposed pilot "Economically independent family" is designed for three territories of different types, up to three thousand families and thirty-six months.

These are preliminary parameters for model verification.

The first hundred days are devoted to the design, diagnosis and preparation of routes.

It is proposed to evaluate the result by real income, quality of work, time of care, reserve, assets and freedom of choice.

Expansion should be suspended if employment growth is accompanied by a deterioration in security, rights, family time, or debt burden.

Participation remains voluntary. It provides for data minimization, the right to correct the error and appeal the decision.

Economic independence of the family is the ability to cover basic needs, withstand ordinary income fluctuations and build the future, preserving dignity and the right to choose.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Entrepreneurship

Source status: Public film library

An entrepreneurial initiative starts with a real need, a first order and cooperation around a useful result.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Entrepreneurship begins with the ability to create a useful business: solve a real problem, earn income and build a sustainable enterprise.

This is devoted to the author's concept of Sergei Leonidovich Sokolov "New World Order. Entrepreneurship", edition of the seventh September two thousand twenty-sixth year.

We have before us a project for discussion and training of a territorial pilot, and not an active program with guaranteed results.

The main idea is to change what is considered a success of support.

The focus is on the confirmed value, executed order, cash flow and accumulated assets. The result for the family is also important: disposable income, time, sustainability.

For the territory - useful services, jobs and connections between enterprises.

The route formula is simple: demand, idea, team, product, order and scale.

Why is support not enough? The idea may not have a buyer, the team - equipment, and production - timely payment.

Money alone does not eliminate these gaps.

Therefore, the first principle of the concept is demand before debt.

Before raising capital, you should check the need, customer requirements, acceptable price, product economy and the ability to fulfill obligations.

The proposed route includes seven gates: need, idea, demand confirmation, team, pilot, first steady order and scale. At each stage, clear evidence of readiness is needed: interviews or pre-orders, role distribution, testing, limited supply, repeated sales.

The next resource opens after verification.

In case of refusal, the participant receives a basis, a method of correction and an opportunity to return to the project.

It is proposed to assess the readiness through nineteen related business balances.

They cover initiative and family, demand and product, team and technology, materials, power, energy, finance, accounting, law and data.

Complement the picture of logistics, sales, cooperation, ecology, risks and territorial effect.

In each direction, the state, deficit, action, responsible and proof of result are fixed.

There are five links in the overall scheme. "EQUILIBRIUM" is responsible for diagnosis; "Sphere" - for initiatives and teams; Eco-PPA links demand, resources and agreements; "SPECZASHCHITA" organizes cooperation and execution.

Completes the route contour of the market and the territory where the order, income and assets appear.

So four organizational platforms are associated with the practical result and its verification.

The participant needs one clear entrance. For this purpose, an entrepreneur’s passport and a single window with a coordinator, a calendar and a specific next action are provided.

The passport connects the idea, team, demand, production, finance, rights and risks. Re-entering information should be reduced.

Referrals between organizations are not considered to be the result of themselves: a solution or an understandable alternative route is required.

A special place is occupied by the family of the entrepreneur.

The start should take into account mandatory expenses, health, time of care and permissible debt load. The concept proposes to protect critical family assets and smoothly reduce support as sustainable income grows.

A person retains the freedom of choice: entrepreneurial, hired or mixed way.

Participation in the program should not turn into a debt trap.

Collaboration allows small teams to complete more complex orders.

Common workshops, equipment, laboratories, procurement, logistics and sales reduce the need for each participant in their own capacities.

But working together requires transparent rules: who invests what, what is responsible for what, who owns the rights and how the income is distributed.

Quality is confirmed by checks that are proportional to the risk of the product and delivery.

Funding is built in stages. Testing an idea, creating a prototype, a revolving cycle and expanding production require different tools.

Before a new commitment, you need to assess the full cost, payment terms and stability in an unfavorable scenario.

The purpose of the enterprise is to create a reserve and assets: equipment, technologies, rights, reputation, competencies and repeated contracts that support further development and independence.

The digital system links nine registers: observations, meanings, classification, scenarios, decisions, actions, results, evidence, and communications. Artificial intelligence and computing infrastructure help to compare demand, power and competence, assess options and notice risks in advance.

Decisions affecting a person’s access to finance or the market should remain with the responsible people and allow for independent appeal.

Trust requires clear rules for working with data.

The participant should see who and why requested the information, be able to correct the error and manage the consent. Family data requires separate protection.

The recommendations of the system should be understandable.

To counteract conflicts of interest and simulate demand, a decision log, independent inspections, disclosure of communications and a clear procedure for appeal are provided.

It is proposed to test the approach in the pilot "Entrepreneurial Territory - a thousand" for thirty-six months. Three types of territories are considered: urban agglomeration, industrial territory and rural or remote contour.

To calculate the load, a funnel is planned: three thousand diagnostic participants, a thousand initiatives, five hundred confirmations of demand, three hundred pilots, one hundred and eighty stable orders and one hundred and twenty scaling projects.

These numbers are scripted landmarks. They require clarification after diagnosis, examination and approval of funding.

The pilot does not promise each participant a grant, loan or government order.

The hypothesis is tested: a combination of demand, a single route, common infrastructure and stage capital will help more projects to reach a re-order and stable cash flow.

The findings should be supported by an independent assessment.

The first hundred days are set aside for rules, management team, territory diagnostics, demand map and launch of a single window. Then pilot deliveries and verification of financial instruments are assumed. In the second year - the development of orders, assets and interregional ties. By the end of the third, an independent assessment and adjustment of the model.

The decision to expand further should be based on the evidence obtained.

The result is proposed to be measured by nineteen indicators, including re-ordering, family income, reserve, timeliness of payment, enterprise sustainability, jobs and asset growth. The methods and initial values should be determined before the start.

The concept is to create an honest and accessible environment in which useful work can be turned into income, independence, a strong family and the development of the territory.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Financial sustainability

Source status: Public film library

Money, reserves and shared assets are presented as elements of a proposed model for the financial resilience of families and territories.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

How to link money with real quality of life?

How do you ensure that financing leaves a sustainable income, operating businesses, useful assets and the opportunity to develop?

These questions are addressed in your materials “New World Order.

Finances”, prepared in the framework of the concept of "EQUILIBRIUM".

Before us is a project for discussion, legal expertise and pilot design. It describes the proposed architecture and the procedure for its verification.

The central idea is simple: a financial decision should be evaluated by what need it closes, what rights it retains and what result it creates for a person, family and territory.

The authors highlight several gaps. Income, benefits, expenses, debts and assets are accounted for separately. The budget is not always turned into an existing service or a saved workplace.

The short horizon of solutions leaves beyond the calculation of repair, maintenance and restoration. The complexity of the rules makes it difficult for families, small projects and rural areas to participate.

The proposed transition begins with a sequence: need, right, resource, outcome, asset, and development.

First, we find out what needs to be done.

Then it is determined who is entitled to act and on what basis.

After that, the source of funds, the conditions of execution and the method of verification are selected.

The result becomes the basis of the next cycle.

The concept has five expected results. A secure life means access to basic services and emergency resources. Sustainable income is estimated after mandatory spending. The reserve helps to survive the violation of the usual flow.

Productive assets create the ability to live and produce.

Development returns some of the result to learning, infrastructure, innovation, and environmental restoration.

The proposed system should work through statutory mechanisms for payments, financing, insurance and asset management.

The document separately excludes the creation of a parallel currency, tax evasion and unlicensed management of funds. Personal and family funds here denote project models, the specific legal form of which has yet to be determined.

Nine principles set the rules. The person retains the right to explanation and appeal. The legal basis precedes the transaction.

Financing is associated with the result, income is more important than turnover, the reserve is formed in advance. Support increases independence.

Transparency is combined with data minimization, cooperation retains the rights of participants, and decisions are subject to independent verification.

The architecture covers seven levels: person, family, project, enterprise and cooperation, territory, state, international exchange.

Each level has its own balance. At the same time, the growth of indicators of the territory should be checked through the consequences for families. The success of an enterprise is correlated with pay, the stability of cash flows and the state of total assets.

Seven interrelated contours are proposed for management: life, labor, design and production, stock, settlement, risk and sovereign.

Such a scheme helps to find the place of the gap.

For example, a problem may arise in insufficient income, lack of an order, delay in payment or lack of reserve. Different reasons require different solutions.

The core of the concept is nineteen related financial balances.

These are nineteen areas of diagnosis, for each of which an indicator, responsible and corrective action is needed.

The first four focus on financial access and dignity, family income, cost of living, and time of care and unpaid contribution.

The next group combines pay and participation as a result, liabilities and debt, reserve and savings, financial knowledge and navigation.

It checks how clear the conditions are, whether the debt load corresponds to the participant’s capabilities and whether there is protection in case of loss of income.

Training is complemented by access to independent explanation of options.

The ninth through twelfth balances consider enterprise cash flow, cooperation and mutual financing, demand and sales, housing and productive assets. They connect production with the buyer and future receipts. For shared equipment, the contribution, access, maintenance, distribution of the result and the participant’s ability to withdraw are specified in advance.

The following four areas are project financing by stages, funds and portfolios, payments and calculations, accounting and data verification.

Complete the risk and insurance system, territorial reinvestment and ecology, sovereign and external long-term balance.

So one financial flow is considered simultaneously through result, rights, obligations, and sustainability.

At the family level, it is proposed to collect a holistic picture: regular income, necessary expenses, debt payments, time of care, reserve, assets and goals. It is important to see what resource remains after basic needs are met.

Separately, the care of children and the elderly is taken into account: it affects both expenses and available time for paid work.

The working tool becomes a voluntary financial passport of the family.

It records consents, goals, sources of income, obligations and an agreed course of action. The document provides for the right to see your data, correct the error and appeal the significant decision.

The passport should not be turned into a public dossier, a hidden rating or an automatic reason for refusal.

The project has its own financial passport. It connects the need and customer, team and authority, product and technology, budget and sources of funds. Individual sections describe cash flow, risks, evidence of performance, and distribution of outcome.

The key question at the entrance: who needs the product and how will its acceptance be confirmed?

Funding is proposed to be issued as and when it matures.

The diagnosis clarifies the need. A small pilot tests the hypothesis.

The confirmed order allows you to discuss the funds for execution.

Steady turnover creates the basis for equipment and infrastructure.

Scaling is considered after the model, management, and reporting are verified.

Each next step requires new confirmation.

Let’s look at an example that illustrates this logic.

The manufacturers want to buy common refrigeration equipment.

First, it confirms the demand and volume of supplies, then agrees on the rights of participants and the cost of operation. The pilot checks the circuit.

After the result is confirmed, the financing of the asset is considered, and in the current flow, a provision for service is provided.

The concept of “smart money” in the materials means the relationship of the resource with the purpose, stage, right, risk and proof.

The next tranche depends on the confirmed performance.

If the timing, demand or cost has changed, the authorized participant makes an understandable decision: to continue, adjust or stop. In this logic, the traceability of responsibility throughout the means is important.

The full cycle consists of eight stages. Necessity; law and basis; plan and budget; financing; execution; proof; distribution; reinvestment. After acceptance, remuneration, refunds, income of participants, taxes and reserve are determined. Part of the outcome may be channelled into assets and training, if agreed upon.

Debt is treated in the concept along with future cash flow and adverse scenarios. You need to see the main debt, interest, commissions, pledges and guarantees. Reserves are built on several levels: family, project, cooperation, territory and country.

For each level, its own liquidity, available protection and the procedure for actions in case of violation of the usual work are determined.

The system of funds distinguishes between personal, family, target, cooperative, territorial and long-term tasks. Each fund should have separate goals, sources, powers, limits, reporting and exit rules.

A common asset requires a budget for the entire life cycle: creation, operation, repair, modernization and completion of use.

Buying for sustainability is not enough.

Information on people’s incomes, state of enterprises, budget, infrastructure and natural resources is combined on the territory.

In the proposed model, it is important to see what remains after the project: jobs, equipment, knowledge, available services, a restored environment.

Territorial reinvestment links the current economic result with the opportunities of the next generation.

Platform roles are distributed functionally.

"EQUILIBRIUM" links goals, balances and performance.

The accounting team sets the rules of passports and reconciliations.

Computational GRID models scenarios and risks.

SFERA brings together participants and initiatives.

ECO-PI-PI-AI connects confirmed demand with agreements, "SPECZASHCHITA" - with cooperation of execution.

The calculations remain in regulated channels.

The data should allow us to trace the path from the base to the result.

Nine end-to-end registers link observations, meanings, classification, scenarios, decisions, actions, results, evidence, and connections between objects. In practice, this means the ability to compare the contract, payment, delivery and acceptance, to identify the author of the change and to conduct an independent audit.

Artificial intelligence has a supporting role.

It can find discrepancies in documents, model cash flows, warn of cash gaps, and explain options.

The concept prohibits secretly assessing the value of a person and individually accepting significant refusals. The decision is the responsibility of the authorized person; there is an explanation, revision and the possibility of disabling the model.

Data protection is based on minimization, sharing of access, understandable purpose of processing and limited storage periods.

Family, project, payment and public information should not automatically merge. Management is also divided: the strategic board, project headquarters, finance committee, accounting group, rights and data committee, balance sheet owners, and independent review have different responsibilities.

For verification, the pilot of the "Financially stable territory - a thousand" is proposed.

Its horizon is thirty-six months and three types of territories.

Scenario guidelines provide for up to a thousand families or participants, up to three hundred businesses, up to a hundred initiatives, up to twenty total assets and seven funds or portfolios. These numbers define the design framework and require clarification.

The first thirty days are reserved for mandate and diagnosis.

Legal conditions and profiles are developed up to the sixtieth day.

It is proposed to launch ten fast pilots by the hundredth day.

During the first year, funds are formed and evaluated.

This is followed by expansion, stress testing, and the final test needed to decide on a further scale.

It is proposed that success be measured using nineteen indicators.

Among them are household disposable income, reserve availability, debt load security, service availability, project survival, growth of productive assets, and data quality. The initial state is fixed before the intervention.

Methods should be clear, and the publication of aggregates should maintain the confidentiality of participants.

The resource structure is still scripted. Twenty-four percent are offered for pilots and revolving financing, twenty-three percent for general assets and infrastructure, and ten percent for risk reserve and guarantees. The remaining areas cover support, diagnosis, family transition, data and assessment.

Sources, cost, repayment and budgetary implications should determine a separate financial and economic model.

Among the key risks are funding without result, hidden debt, fund grabbing, discrimination, fraud and cyber incidents.

Each risk is asked to assign an owner, an indicator, a limit, and a response plan.

The economic effect should be checked together with the observance of rights, the quality of evidence and the ability to correct the error.

The first practical step is to determine the boundaries of the pilot, appoint those responsible, diagnose the three territories and prepare testable solutions with confirmed demand.

Twelve months later, an independent evaluation is provided.

The main idea of the materials is an honest connection between need, law, work, obligation, result and responsibility.

It is this connection that must be tested in practice.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Cooperation

Source status: Public film library

A shared order, a joint asset and transparent distribution of results reveal the practical meaning of cooperation.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Alone in a small workshop, it is difficult to fulfill a large order.

The farmer is to arrange storage and delivery.

The family needs affordable services.

At the same time, there may be the right people, knowledge and free capacities.

How to combine their efforts, maintaining the independence of each?

Such a task is set by the concept of "Cooperation" in the system "EQUILIBRIUM.

The New World Order.” The author of the concept is Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov.

We have before us a project for the discussion and training of the territorial pilot.

Its central idea is a voluntary joint result contract that protects the participant and creates a common asset.

Work begins with a specific need.

What do you need to do? For who? What time?

Who is willing to accept and pay for the result? After that, the team gathers.

Everyone understands in advance their role, obligations, risk limit and exit order.

The organizational form is chosen taking into account this task.

Let’s take a conventional example: several small workshops get the opportunity to jointly produce a batch of furniture. One prepares the parts, the other performs the assembly, the third organizes the delivery. Common equipment and uniform quality requirements help to connect operations.

The customer receives the finished result, and the participants - clear work and payment.

For such a chain to become sustainable, an agreement is needed before production begins.

Who contributes money, who provides the machine, who is responsible for quality?

How is the equipment booked? Who is covering the repair?

How is the dispute resolved?

These rules combine the concept into a contract of result.

Contributions are recorded separately. Labor, property, capital, knowledge and technology have different ways of evaluating. The participant must see what is confirmed, what obligations he has accepted and what result he has accrued.

Changing the rules requires an established procedure.

Confirmed contributions cannot be written in retrospect.

A common asset may be a workshop, laboratory, warehouse, or transport.

As well as brand, technology and sales network. Access to them is determined in advance: schedule, tariff, priority, responsibility for safety.

The operator shall organize the work within the agreed powers.

The participants retain the opportunity to verify his decisions and appeal the refusal.

Nineteen cooperative balances have been proposed to test the viability.

They link needs and trust, rights and competencies, demand and quality, resources and finance, risks and territorial impact.

Each identified deficit receives an action, responsible, deadline and confirmation of the result.

It seems to me that this really hinders collaboration.

Digital architecture combines several functions.

"EQUILIBRIUM" helps to diagnose balance.

The Sphere gathers initiatives and teams. Eco-pee-eye connects resources, agreements and demand. "SPECZASHCHITA" forms the contour of execution.

Customers and territories give feedback on the quality and usefulness of the result.

All this is a proposed scheme for the organization of the program.

The launch path goes through seven stages: the need, the circle of participants, the agreement, the resource map, the small pilot, the general order and reinvestment.

First, the team checks the work on a small volume.

Delivery, acceptance and timely payment show whether it is capable of moving to the next cycle.

Funding is selected under the stage and cash flow.

The distribution formula takes into account separately the mandatory costs, labour, contribution, reserve and development. Part of the result supports repair, training and new capacity.

The point is that each successfully completed order strengthens the ability to work further.

A special place is occupied by human protection. Participation voluntarily.

Family and general risks are divided. The exit rules are known in advance.

Artificial intelligence can map resources, calculate options, and warn of delays.

Decisions on rights, income and participation are left to the people and should be subject to review.

It is proposed to check the model in the pilot "Cooperative territory - a thousand".

The timeframe is thirty-six months. Three types of territory are envisaged: urban, industrial, and rural or remote.

One of the project guidelines is one hundred and twenty sustainable chains.

These parameters require clarification after diagnosis and coordination with the territories.

Success is offered to be assessed by repeated orders, timely payment, family income, loading of total capacities and transparency of distribution.

Also important are the disputes resolved, the accumulated reserve and the confirmed benefit to the territory.

Scaling follows the verified result.

A practical start is to find a common need, confirm demand, assemble a volunteer team and agree on the rules of the small pilot.

Then complete the first order and check the calculations.

This is how the sequence is formed: need, agreement, total asset, order, income, reinvestment and development of the territory.

Cooperation makes the joint power understandable to each participant.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Contribution and right to vote

Source status: Public film library

How to recognise different contributions and agree on decisions: a clear introduction to the proposed model of participation in the cooperative.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The most common fear is when people are asked to unite: “Will not mine dissolve in a common boiler?”

That's an honest question. And the cooperative has an honest answer to it.

There's no boiler in common.

No matter how many participants there are, each has its own contribution passport.

A profile is a document recording exactly what a person contributes, when it was created, on what basis it belongs to that person and what is supported by documents. Until the profile is completed and checked, the contribution is not recognised.

Strictly? Yeah.

But disputes and grievances are born not from the rules, but from their absence.

There are iron distinctions.

Participation experience is not the value of an asset: a contribution is measured by what a person has created, not by the years next to it.

The money spent is not the market price: the result is considered.

Authorship is not yet a formal right: to invent one thing, to legally fix another.

And participation in negotiations is not a right to a share of the entire portfolio.

But the participants are half the picture. The second half is how decisions are made.

In the cooperative, the management is divided into levels.

Strategic - defines the goals and approves the main thing.

Project - is responsible for specific deadlines, budgets and results.

Expert - checks: technology, law, finance, ecology.

Control - ensures that the procedures are followed, and interests are not mixed.

No one is a judge in their own case.

For daily work there is a system with a short name SMUP.

In fact, the working remote: each project has a stage, a budget - a plan and a fact, the nearest control points, risks and responsible.

Not "we'll figure it out later", but the picture of the day - on the same screen.

And another detail that says a lot.

Each decision falls into the register - who proposed, who approved, when and on what basis.

The decision cannot be removed. We changed our mind - a new one is created, with reference to the old one.

History is not rewritten.

Justice is not a slogan. It's a procedure: fix, verify, acknowledge.

In the next video, let’s look at the portfolio of the cooperative itself — what exactly people brought to the common cause.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

The Cooperative’s Portfolio

Source status: Public film library

The film presents a proposed process for describing shared assets and checking whether projects are ready for the next step.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Let’s open the most interesting part of the White Book — an inventory of what the participants brought to the common cause.

There's something to light up here.

But the co-op has a rule: first show, then explain how it is checked.

So, what's in the briefcase?

The property complex in Blagoveshchensk is administrative buildings and land plots.

Industrial dumps are man-made mountains of waste from old industries in which valuable metals can remain.

Technology and installation of raw materials processing, which, according to statements, have already been tested abroad.

The line of small energy - from installations of watt class to industrial.

Digital platforms and portals. Forecasting system of natural disasters.

And an array of documentation: scientific materials, technical specifications, patent blanks - the work of many years.

Impressive? Impressive.

And now, what distinguishes the cooperative from the projectors.

Each object on this list gets its own card.

It’s not about advertising, it’s about questions. Who owns it?

What's confirmed? In what condition?

What has already been proven, and what has just been announced?

Let's take the dumps. It sounds like “mountains full of metal”.

But the right to land is not yet the right to what lies on it.

The metal content is rumored to be not the same as that of laboratory tests.

And gross value is not profit: subtract extraction, processing, logistics, taxes - and the figure will change beyond recognition.

Therefore, the object card requires: samples, documents, calculation.

Or recycling technology. In conversations, she is one.

And for the cause, three things must be separated: the very attitude as iron, the way as intellectual property, and the test results as facts. Everyone can have their own owner and their own destiny.

For the entire portfolio, there is a readiness scale: the idea - documentation - prototype - tested - works.

It is possible to climb a step only according to proven criteria, and the general status of the object is equal to its weakest link.

To boast of a strong side, hiding a weak one, will not work here.

A co-op portfolio is not a showcase.

This is a desktop where everything is picked up, reviewed and checked.

In the next video - the digital house where all this household lives: platform EQUILIBRIUM.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

The Cooperative’s Capital

Source status: Public film library

Contributions, reserves and distribution rules are considered as the basis for clear and responsible relationships within the cooperative.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

There are always big numbers around any big deal.

Do you know what the co-op does?

It says, “Not confirmed.”

Any amount here is considered only a guide until it has been verified.

Bored? Perhaps.

But this is the only financial model that does not end in scandal.

Let us explain its foundations in simple terms.

One. Spending does not mean earned.

Participants have been investing in development for years, and these costs are important to fix: the contract, the period, the result.

But the million invested does not automatically turn into a million-dollar asset.

You can invest a million dollars in something worth a hundred thousand dollars, or you can create something worth millions for a hundred thousand dollars.

It is the result, not the check.

Two. Evaluation is the answer to four questions.

What exactly is being evaluated? Who owns the right?

On what date and by what method is calculated?

Which part is confirmed, and which is the assumption?

The number without these answers is just a beautiful number.

With them is a working tool.

Three. The reserve fund is a general business security cushion.

And it has strict rules: the reserve has a purpose, limits and prohibitions, separate accounting and independent control.

The main prohibition is that the reserve cannot be distributed as a free profit.

The airbag is not eaten.

Four.

All payments are made only through the legal financial infrastructure: the bank, official payments, verifiable transactions.

No notebooks or envelopes.

Fifth, and most important for each participant.

The distribution of the result is based on the principle of waterfall.

Money comes from a real project and flows through previously known stages: first, obligations and costs, then a reserve, then a distribution between participants on confirmed deposits.

Not after.

Before.

What is the point of all this rigor? Respect for people.

Promises are easy. But to show where the money will come from, how they will be counted and in what order they will be divided is honesty in numbers.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

The Cooperative’s Digital Accounting

Source status: Public film library

Object profiles, rights and the history of decisions form a concept for transparent digital records of a shared endeavour.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Where do agreements usually disappear? In personal correspondence.

In someone's folder on the table. In memory, "we decided then."

A year passes, and no one remembers who, what and under what conditions he contributed.

That is how even the best things die.

The cooperative solves this problem radically.

The whole thing lives in a single digital environment.

Its name is EQUILIBRIUM.

In translation, it means “balance.” This is not a site or file folder.

This is a digital set of everything that a cooperative has: assets, rights, participants, projects, documents and decisions.

How does it work when explained in human terms?

Each object has its own digital passport.

The land, the technology, the program, the contribution of the participant - all receive a unique number and card: what is it, whose is it, what is confirmed in what state. As a medical record, only for assets.

Each number has its own source.

Where did this number come from, who called it, what document is supported, it is checked or it is just stated.

No numbers from the air.

Each participant has their own office.

You come in and you see: here is my contribution, here is its status, here are the documents and decisions that concern it.

No need to call anyone and ask for information.

You don't have to take your word for it.

The concept of the platform is large - the target map has nineteen systems and thirteen directions, hundreds of modules.

But even here the cooperative is true to itself: no one declares all this ready.

First, the core of the most necessary: participants, objects, rights, documents, decisions.

Pilots on real projects. Extension is only for confirmed use.

The house is built from the foundation, not from the weather vane.

And the fundamental thing is the safety and immutability of history.

The platform stores sensitive information, so access is on the principle of “only what is needed”.

And the record of decisions can not be erased retroactively: changed - a new record is created with a reference to the old one.

Trust between people is a fragile thing.

Therefore, the cooperative builds it not in words, but on architecture: it is impossible to imperceptibly replace, erase or rewrite it in the system.

Equilibrium of interests, anchored by technology.

In the next video - how the cooperative makes even a kilowatt-hour honest.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Reference forms

Source status: Public film library

A common language for records helps connect source information, responsibility and verification of results. The film explains the concept of standard forms.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Why don’t even detailed reports always help you understand who made the decision and what has changed in people’s lives? When the information is scattered, the documents differ in versions, and the responsibility is lost between the performers, the management needs a common language.

“Reference forms” is a proposal for such a language within the “New World Order” metaproject. The working version of the standard proposes linking the individual, resources, decisions, action and evidence.

This is a project model: its practical application requires adaptation to the powers of participants and data protection rules.

A form is a minimum sufficient record of an object or event.

It answers simple questions: what is it about, who answers, on what basis it acts, what resources it uses and how the result is checked.

Primary information is recorded once, then used by links.

Architecture is based on people, family and territory.

The next level is formulas. Above are related registries, independent verification, and archives. Such a structure should preserve the path from the human need to the result and history of the decision.

The catalogue includes nineteen types of forms.

The first eight describe participants, organizations, territories, facilities, assets, technologies, projects, and resources. The following nine capture observation, meaning, classification, scenario, decision, action, result, proof, and connection.

Two more forms are devoted to risks and the final balance.

Any record has a single basis: ID, status, owner, legal basis and content. These include the impact on balance sheets, risks, relationships, evidence, and history of change.

An approved entry cannot be tacitly rewritten: the change creates a new version, saving the previous one.

Nine registers of the "Thinking Stream" organize the movement of information.

First, observation is recorded, then its meaning and classification.

After that, scenarios are considered, a decision is made, an action is performed and the result is checked. Evidence and connections allow the entire chain to be restored.

Let’s take a hypothetical example: residents report water supply disruptions.

The message becomes an observation. Experts check the reasons and compare the options. The responsible person chooses the decision, appoints the executor, the resource and the term. After repair, the stability of the water supply is measured.

The act of work and the confirmed improvement are recorded separately.

This requires different roles. The decision-maker is responsible for the choice, the executor for the action, the validator for the verification. In significant decisions, one person should not combine these roles and single-handedly confirm their own result.

The participant retains the opportunity to get an explanation, correct the error and appeal the decision.

Any change is measured through nineteen related balances.

These include human dignity, family, health, education, work, finance, infrastructure, water, energy and the environment.

The question is what has improved, who has been affected, and what other indicator could have worsened.

Unknown impact is noted directly.

Before a significant action, the record passes ten gates of quality.

The identification, authority, owner, rights, resource, term, balances, risks, result and proof are checked.

According to the rules of the project, if the mandatory condition is not met, the record remains under revision and does not serve as a basis for irreversible action.

Proof also needs a clear status.

The proposed scale begins with a statement, then requires a source, method, and verification. The next level is independent validation.

The current proof has a version, a term and a place of storage.

The absence of evidence does not mean that the event did not occur.

Artificial intelligence can check completeness, find duplicates, offer connections, and help with scripts. The project prohibits hidden social rating and automatic denial of rights or support.

A significant decision preserves the specific owner and the possibility of appeal.

The data remain with the rightful owners and are linked through access rights.

It is proposed to test the approach in the “Reference Framework — One Thousand” pilot: three territories, ten organisations, nineteen types of forms and up to one thousand linked records. The timeframe for creation, piloting and scaling is thirty-six months.

These are the proposed parameters, and further expansion depends on independent evaluation.

The first hundred days are devoted to the catalog and roles, comparing existing documents, setting up the registry and access rights, training participants and completing the full cycle. Success is assessed by reducing re-entry, understandable responsibility, speed of harmonization and provability of results.

The main idea of the reference forms is to keep in touch for the sake of the result.

Fact is separated from opinion. The decision has a basis and owner.

The obligation is secured by the resource. The result is verified.

And the next cycle begins with an understanding of what has really improved for the individual, society, and territory.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Science

Source status: Public film library

From question and hypothesis to test and proof: a short film about the scientific approach to useful change.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The fourteenth direction is “Science”. The master package proposes linking research to real development challenges through a shared cycle: hypothesis, testing, evidence, standards and implementation.

Such a cycle should involve institutions, universities, community centres and enterprises.

This requires interdisciplinary programs, an archive of scientific heritage, academic registries, test stands, and accurate measurements.

A separate task is to transfer research to pilots and serial solutions.

Evaluate the work should be on the reproducibility of the results, loading equipment and time from study to pilot.

The first step is an inter-institutional project on one system call.

It should have a common data model, a test base, an agreed standard of evidence and a specific customer of the result.

Before launch, it is necessary to confirm the initial state and prepare the pilot's passport.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

IMASH RAS Hypergraphs

Source status: Public film library

Project connections, partners and responsibility are presented in a working concept of hypergraphs as a way to see a shared task and participants’ contributions.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Hypergraphs are RAN. External contours and a single result contour.

How to connect scientific schools, equipment and external partners so that the path from task to implementation becomes clear and manageable?

The presented materials offer a working concept of a full-cycle institute.

This is a model for discussion, not an approved organizational structure.

The starting point is the difference between subordination and cooperation.

The organizational chart shows the units and powers.

But for a specific result, it is necessary to see who combines knowledge, data, testing and customer. The concept preserves scientific schools and proposes to supplement the administrative structure with a matrix organization of project work.

A node is a laboratory, customer, stand, competence or project.

A normal rib connects two objects. Hyperrebro unites a whole group: customer, scientific school, design office, testing, financing and standard. Such a joint connection has a passport: the owner, participants, data, resources, timing, risks and the result criterion.

The internal architecture combines six blocks: scientific schools, software complexes, end-to-end platforms, project cells, digital GRID and unified services. Among the scientific directions in the model named strength, materials, tribology, mechanics of machines, biomechanics and vibroacoustics.

Platforms provide design, prototyping, testing, metrology and technology transfer.

A specific task is collected by the project cell.

It is proposed to include a scientific supervisor, chief designer, project manager, customer representative and a validator of the result.

The team accompanies the full life cycle.

Scientific validity, engineering readiness and independent verification are given separate responsibility.

The external map contains eight basic contours.

The state transfers priorities and tasks.

Academic links schools, research and expertise.

Industrial brings a technological request and a platform for implementation.

The technology connects design bureaus, engineering, test sites and test facilities. For each connection, the input, output, owner, and metric are determined.

The regional contour provides pilot sites and replication.

Educational helps to train personnel and close the lack of competencies.

Financial and investment links grants, investments and the financial model of the project.

The digital and legal contour sets the work with data, standards and intellectual property. The partnership should lead to a specific project cell and a verifiable result.

Digital passports are issued to eight groups of entities: science, projects, technology, resources, people, partners, regulatory objects and results. The passport retains the ID, owner, status, communications, restrictions, documents and history of changes. This allows us to see what skills and resources are really involved.

The document identifies eight types of managed connections.

They connect the order with the school, the school with the program, the program with the platform, the project with the life cycle. Other connections combine data and services, balance and solution, partner and result, pilot and replication.

Everyone needs rules of change and proof of effect.

The single route of the result begins with the order.

Then come the scientific hypothesis, model, prototype and tests.

The next stages are standards and registration of intellectual property, pilot operation and replication. External participants form demand and provide sites. Internal teams turn the task into a proven result.

Transitions between stages are designed as a gate for decision-making.

The promotion is confirmed by the task passport, initial data, design documentation, test reports and the act of the pilot.

If there is no owner, acceptance criterion, necessary resources, legal regime or site, the transition is suspended until these restrictions are eliminated.

The completion of the stage must be demonstrable.

Digital GRID is proposed to be built on nine registers.

These are nodes, hyper edges, competencies, equipment, projects, data and models, intangible assets and standards, partners, results and evidence. The first step is to share common identifiers, directories, and sharing with existing systems.

Data needs origin, quality, access rights and history of change.

Nineteen linked balances help evaluate a project against a set of constraints.

They cover strategy, science, production, materials, energy, infrastructure, people, equipment, projects, finance, law, data, and effects.

For example, having a budget does not mean having a free stand or specialist.

A comparison of scenarios should take into account these dependencies and the proven availability of resources.

The architecture of responsibility connects the director, the scientist and the portfolio council, the partners, the office of the chief designer and the heads of schools and platforms. The accounting team keeps passports, balances and evidence. For a significant decision, the initiator, expert, owner, executor and validator should be visible.

The powers and procedure of coordination should be fixed in the regulations.

Four pilots are offered to test the model.

The first is materials of the New Order: ceramics, synthetic crystals, tribology and wear resistance. The route runs from calculation to sample, testing and standard. The second is the digital life cycle of the machine: passport, reliability, residual resource and the connection of test data with operation.

The third pilot is human and machine: biomechanics, rehabilitation systems, adaptive control and validation.

The fourth is vibroacoustic safety: diagnostics, models, test methods and industry applications.

General conditions of choice are a real customer, a platform, available resources and the ability to check the effect in the horizon of six to twelve months.

These are suggestions for launch.

The roadmap spans twenty-four months.

In the first month - a dictionary, a working group and the choice of pilots.

By the third month - passports, roles and gates.

By the sixth - the minimum GRID and project cells.

Further prototypes, tests and pilot operation are planned.

In the second year - replication, new partners and consolidation of working processes.

As a guideline, the document offers: at least ninety percent of projects with a customer, owner, gate and effect metric; reduction of the median time from task setting to the first prototype by twenty-five to thirty-five percent; at least ninety-five percent of results with independent protocols and metrology. These are targets, not targets.

The assessment will require a baseline, a period and a verification method.

The main risks are duplicate reporting, conflict of powers, bad data and overload of key specialists.

Suggested measures: one fact - one record, a fixed owner of communication, quality control and visible loading of resources.

Scientific schools retain their responsibilities.

Access to knowledge and intellectual property is governed by agreed rules.

The first practical step is to agree on a pilot model, appoint a program manager and a GRID owner, choose three to four tasks with customers and create project cells.

Then describe the resources and connections, and in ninety days to conduct a review.

The main idea is simple: strong units are connected in the full path of the result, when the teamwork has an owner, data, rules and evidence.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

IMASH RAS Computational GRID

Source status: Public film library

The working concept brings together computing, data and digital twins for joint research and testing scenarios.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Computational GRID of the Institute of Mechanical Engineering of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Mathematics of Large Numbers. A working concept of an interagency system that links data, scientific knowledge and computing to engineering solutions.

Its main focus is the full path from the task to the proven result and implementation.

Today, data, models, equipment, and competencies are often shared between organizations. Calculations are repeated, and research does not always reach practical application. The GRID concept proposes to link the participants with common rules in order to see the resources, limitations, responsible and evidence of the result throughout the life cycle of the project.

The basis of the system is the federal principle. Data can remain with the owners: in the institute, in the enterprise or in the region.

GRID provides catalog and controlled access.

The request or model is sent to the source, and the allowed result returns.

For each set, the origin, quality and conditions of use are fixed.

The architecture offers seven layers: infrastructure, computing, data, knowledge, mathematics and artificial intelligence, digital twins, services and solutions. This sequence shows how technical resources are turned into tools of the researcher, engineer and manager. Each layer has its own function in the overall system.

The computational circuit combines federal, academic, regional and industry nodes, as well as data processing next to sensors and machines.

The dispatcher selects the resource for the task, taking into account safety, time, cost and energy consumption. The calculation protocol saves the launch conditions and allows you to check the reproducibility of the result.

Large number mathematics is the working title of a set of methods for systems with a huge number of objects, connections, and options.

It combines graphs, optimization, statistics, simulation, reliability theory and machine learning.

Their task is to compare scenarios, take into account uncertainty and find solutions in given constraints.

The hypergraph describes complex cooperation. One connection can unite the customer, scientific team, data, model, equipment, standards and expected effect.

In such a scheme, IMAS RAS is offered the role of a scientific and system integrator.

The dependencies between the participants and the way in which joint work leads to results become visible.

Nine registers preserve the logic of the work: observations, meanings, classification, scenarios, decisions, actions, results, evidence and connections. It's the memory of the system. The completed project returns the actual effect and supporting materials to it.

The next team gets the opportunity to use the accumulated experience and trace the origin of previous decisions.

The calculation framework is supplemented by nineteen related balances.

They compare resources, needs, reserves and constraints.

For example, expanding production requires matching materials, energy, transportation, and personnel.

Linked computing helps to identify bottlenecks and evaluate how a decision in one area changes opportunities in others.

Each project needs three owners: tasks, models and implementations. The first determines the need, the second is responsible for the method and verification of calculation, the third is responsible for the application of the solution.

The overall route goes through research, prototype, testing, standard, pilot and implementation. Each transition is supported by clear criteria and evidence.

The first pilot direction is new materials, including ceramics and synthetic crystals.

It is proposed to link the composition, manufacturing technology, equipment, properties and operating conditions. The practical product is a digital passport of material and a calculation service of choice. The simulation is accompanied by the manufacture of a prototype and tests that confirm the claimed characteristics.

The second direction is the reliability and life cycle of machines.

Data from sensors, maintenance and test logs are linked to digital twins. On this basis, it is assumed to assess the state, predict the residual resource and plan repairs.

The goal of the pilot is to test how such solutions help reduce risks and improve the reliability of operation.

The third direction combines energy, tariffs, transport and placement of production.

Different scenarios of demand, capacity and logistics are considered.

The solution should be a map of bottlenecks, needs and priority projects.

Options are compared in terms of effect, reliability, costs and risks to choose a sustainable development configuration.

The fourth area is biocenoses, safety and rehabilitation.

It includes observation of natural systems, impact modeling, and engineering tools for restoring human functions.

The proposed principle is the same: to evaluate a technological solution together with its consequences for people and the environment, and to confirm the applicability of models by profile verification.

Trust in the GRID is built on verifiability.

The model must have an owner, version, assumptions, scope and test results. Data has certain access rights.

In the architecture laid channel protection, logging and reservation.

Traceability links input, calculation, engineering solution, and actual effect.

The roadmap spans twenty-four months.

Mandate, inventory and regulations are proposed first.

Then there is the minimum GRID, the launch of pilots and associated balances.

The next steps include industry nodes and scaling up proven services. This is the planning horizon of the concept: the timing is specified along with the resources, participants and control points.

The first month is dedicated to launching.

It is necessary to form a working group, appoint the owners of the pilots, describe the available data, models and equipment. Next, determine the minimum architecture, security requirements and basic indicators. The result should be an agreed passport pilot GRID with a budget of stages, responsible and acceptance criteria.

Success is proposed to be measured by the reproducibility of calculations, the transition to pilots and implementation, saving resources and reducing risks.

Specific indicators are set after baseline assessment.

Computational GRID is the concept of joint work of science, industry and the state. From data and knowledge to proven technology and proven effect.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Digital twin of the territory

Source status: Public film library

How data and scenario models can help us see an area as a whole and test decisions before implementing them.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The fifteenth direction is “Digital environment and artificial intelligence”.

In the master package, it is proposed to combine data, calculations and digital models into a testable solution support system. Its task is to observe the state of the territory, compare scenarios and preserve a clear history of actions with the protection of human rights.

The basis is made up of unified registers, classifiers, a graph of connections, computing infrastructure and digital twins.

Artificial intelligence requires model verification, cybersecurity, data access rules, and a log of solutions.

Measurable benchmarks are data reliability, availability of computations, and the proportion of models tested.

The first pilot is a digital twin of one territory with nineteen balances, a register of evidence and a comparison module for the scenarios of the State Designer.

You need to start with a responsible participant, verification of the source data and the passport of the project.

Digital incidents should also be taken into account.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Knowledge and Energy

Source status: Public film library

A knowledge archive, a training pilot and measurements at an energy hub are connected in a concept where learning supports a responsible technical decision.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Knowledge gives direction. Energy provides action.

But how do you connect them so that the result is useful to man, territory and nature?

In the “New World Order — EQUILIBRIUM” materials, the “Knowledge and Energy” module addresses this topic.

We have a project concept: the way from saved knowledge to a proven solution and practical result.

The main idea is to evaluate development based on what has really changed. Not just how many documents are accumulated, how many calculations are performed or energy is produced.

Competence is important, reliable service, working technology and preserved natural environment.

Knowledge helps to choose action. Energy and other resources make it possible. The test shows whether the goal has been achieved.

The module architecture connects two contours.

The first is the Archive, Academy, researchers and computing resources.

In the second - energy supply, measurements and operation of the engineering unit.

Between them is the decision file: need, baseline, options, responsible, resources and acceptance criteria.

After execution, the results return to the Archive and become the basis for the next step.

The archive of heritage preservation is proposed to make a working infrastructure.

It links historical materials, scientific protocols, engineering solutions and training programs. Each object needs a source, version, access rights, and history of changes.

The status of the content is separately noted: primary material, hypothesis, evaluation or confirmed result.

The value of the Archive is revealed when the material is actually used in learning, calculation or decision making.

The Academy and scientific partners turn materials into competencies and methods.

Among the areas are energy literacy, biocenosis monitoring, materials research, sensors and robotics.

For the result, the question, method, data, uncertainty and limit of applicability are retained.

The failed test is also important: it helps other participants not to repeat the mistake.

The participation of institutions and universities in this architecture implies separate agreements.

Computational GRID is a proposed collaboration of computational resources and permissioned data. You can start with a catalog, storage, a simple model and a solution log. Then connect partner sites for specific tasks. Additional capacity is justified by the need, quality of calculation and costs for the entire service life.

Building your own large data center is not a condition for starting work.

The energy path starts with the right service.

What facilities and processes should work?

When is the load? What can not be interrupted?

After that, the accounting points, the condition of the equipment, the possibilities of reducing losses and supply options are determined. The network, local generation and drives are compared taking into account the conditions of the site. The choice of technology should support the reliability, availability of service and preservation of the natural environment.

Physical accounting requires a common boundary, the same period, and agreed units. The incoming energy must correspond to load, export, loss and change of stock.

The charge and discharge of the drive are reflected separately so that the same energy does not appear in the calculation twice. Electricity, heat, water, and cash costs retain their units. Data mismatching becomes a task to check, rather than disappearing in a beautiful final number.

The contractual framework of ECO-P-P-Y in the concept connects energy supply, computing services, science, training and preservation of the Archive.

For each block, the parties, the scope of work, quality, rights and acceptance are determined. The budget separately shows investments, current expenses and reserves.

The promised financing does not become the money received, and the estimated reduction in energy consumption does not yet mean the finished profit of the project.

Nineteen associated balances of the source system are maintained to harmonize resources. Among them are finance, energy, human resources, science, water, ecology, data and security. For example, the curriculum requires specialists, materials, premises and energy, and its result is manifested in the mastered skill. Relationships show a complete picture of the task. The physical result is reflected in its balance sheet, the monetary consequence - in the financial.

These records are not considered two independent effects.

ORION twenty-two to twenty-two links observation to action and proof. Nine registries consistently preserve observations, meanings, classification, scenarios, decisions, actions, results, evidence, and connections. You can trace where the data came from, why a certain option was chosen, who performed it and what confirmed the effect. Related calculations are reviewed when the source data is updated.

Instead of a single place in the rating, a multidimensional development profile is proposed.

It shows human potential, quality of life, state of nature, education, technology, culture, economy and cooperation, as well as social and long-term sustainability. Comparison requires the same definitions, period and quality of service. The missing data remains as missing. Success in one area does not remove restrictions on safety, rights and the natural environment.

Twelve indicators are proposed for the first launch.

They cover the completeness of the archive and the application of knowledge, research and skills development, reliability of the desired service, energy consumption per unit of service and maximum capacity. The picture is supplemented by a confirmed reduction in consumption, coverage of mandatory payments, water consumption per unit of service, data quality and completed joint tasks.

Each indicator should have a source, method, period, owner and verification status.

How to show the effect? The document gives a completely conditional example.

After adjusting for comparable conditions, the base cost is one hundred twenty-five megawatt-hours, and the cost after the event is one hundred and five.

The difference is twenty megawatt-hours, or sixteen per cent.

This is a demonstration of the comparison method. Such numbers do not describe the results achieved by the pilot and do not automatically promise annual savings or payback.

The proposed pilot site is Safari Park - City of Knowledge or an agreed partner node as part of its program.

The natural core is connected with education, applied science and engineering infrastructure. The start is limited to one engineering facility, an archive collection and two training programs. Here, the cycle to be tested is important: observation, training, research, selected improvement and acceptance of the result.

For the pilot, specific criteria are proposed: one hundred described archival objects, ten confirmed connections with the application and at least thirty consecutive days of measurements.

The data quality goal is at least ninety-five percent of valid intervals.

Three comparable scenarios, two conducted programs, twelve passports of indicators and a check of the archive recovery are also needed.

These are goals for alignment, not a report on the work done.

The first cycle of work is designed for ninety days after the approval of the team, access and budget. First, the responsible are appointed, the node is selected and the boundaries are fixed. Then the observations, the archive description and the training programs are started.

The next step is to compare options, training and verify data recovery. Finally, the independent review evaluates the results and comments. On its basis, a decision is made: to continue, modify, limit or stop the module.

Scaling begins with a reproducible solution.

Methods, training programs, authorized materials and verified protocols are transferred to new sites. Each territory reaffirms its conditions, resources and responsibilities. Knowledge provides the portability of experience.

Energy provides local reliability. Together, they form a developmental cycle in which a useful result can be explained, measured, tested, and passed on.

This is the meaning of the Knowledge and Energy module.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Natural climate

Source status: Public film library

Heat, droughts and floods prompt reflection on a more resilient environment and careful land planning.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The third area of the New World Order is “Natural Climate”.

Climate is proposed to be considered through related processes: landscape, water, soil, vegetation and local natural cycles.

The target result is the resistance of the territory to heat, droughts, floods and seasonal deviations.

Practical modules include landscape water management planning, reforestation, floodplains, swamps and vegetation cover.

A network of climate and environmental observations is needed, as well as scenarios for adapting agriculture, cities and infrastructure to changing conditions.

Landmarks - heat and dry stress, moisture supply, damage from extreme events and the sustainability of vegetation.

The first pilot is the module "Natural climate - biodynamic agriculture".

It is checked according to the initial data and comparative sites for at least three seasons.

The results require observation and independent verification.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Land and soils

Source status: Public film library

Fertility, moisture retention and protection from erosion are presented as interconnected tasks in caring for the land.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The fourth area of the New World Order is “Land and Soils”.

Soil is proposed to be taken into account as a living system, a stock of fertility, water, carbon and biological diversity. The purpose of land use is the reproduction of fertility, reducing erosion and dependence of farms on external resources.

The work begins with a soil health passport and a degradation map.

Practical measures include crop rotations, cover crops, preservation of soil structure, protection of the territory from erosion and return of organic matter.

Biodynamic and regenerative methods are allowed only through comparative verification.

Measure the content of organic matter, structure, water absorption, moisture content, erosion losses and resource intensity of the crop.

The first pilot is a group of farms with control and experimental sites.

A single protocol is established for them, a laboratory check is carried out and a seasonal report is published. The initial state is fixed before the changes begin.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Living soil

Source status: Public film library

The film introduces the concept of land restoration, which focuses on humic substances, microbial communities and soil condition.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Take a handful of sand from the desert.

In the other, a handful of black.

It looks like. Both are loose, both brown.

But in your first hand you have a dead stone crushed into dust.

The second is a living organism.

There are more creatures living in one handful of good soil than there are people on the entire planet.

That's the difference.

And that's why one country feeds half the world, and another buys food for oil.

Soil is not soil. Soil is humus.

Dark organic matter that nature makes of everything that was once alive.

Slowly. Very slowly.

One centimeter in a hundred years or more.

We lose it much faster.

According to UN estimates, about forty percent of the planet’s land has already degraded.

The desert is coming. Every year, entire countries disappear.

And here is the main question of the twenty-first century: what should we do about it?

You can drive black cars.

But this is absurd - imagine how many compounds it takes to fill the Sahara.

Another question can be asked. Not “Where do we get soil?”

, and - "how to make it?"

And here begins the most interesting.

Remember that pond of fish and ducks and quail?

Where is nothing missing?

This is not about fish. More specifically, not just fish.

The whole system — fish, plants, quail — works like a biological reactor.

The output is a thick dark concentrate: humates.

These are the humic substances for which nature usually works for centuries.

But humates are not just “fertilizer from a bottle.”

It's a house.

Look: humic substances themselves do not create soil.

Soil is made by bacteria and fungi. Billions of invisible workers.

The problem is that in the dead sand they have nowhere to live and nothing to eat.

They just don’t survive there.

And the humates give them food and shelter. They hold water.

They bind nutrients and prevent them from being washed away.

They bind heavy metals, making them less dangerous.

In fact, humates are the foundation on which you can build a living community where it did not exist.

And then there’s the idea that changes the scope of the whole project.

If the soil is a community of organisms, then the composition of this community can be selected.

for a specific task. For a specific place.

For salty soil, there are only bacteria.

For those contaminated with industrial waste, others are those that can decompose poisonous compounds.

Scientists call it bioremediation: microbes literally eat pollution.

For the hot sand of Arabia or the Sahel - the third, able to retain moisture and survive the heat.

Not "universal fertilizer for everything." The recipe for the place.

How the medicine is selected for the disease.

Now look at the map of the world. North Africa.

The Arabian Peninsula. Dry areas of India.

The earth where there is sun, there are people, there is money, and there is not just one.

The living earth.

This is the true scale of the idea. Not a fish farm.

And technology that takes organics — any, even waste — and turns it into a basis for life.

Where there was no life.

To be honest, this is not a ready button.

The project under development, the selection of compositions for specific soils are years of field tests, not a couple of weeks.

No one has ever greened the desert with a canister.

The direction chosen is correct.

For thousands of years, mankind has sought and fought for a fertile land.

For the first time in history, we seem to be learning how to do it.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Water: living catchment

Source status: Public film library

Sources, water quality and natural runoff are shown as parts of a single system requiring monitoring and careful management.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The fifth direction of the New World Order is “Water”.

The management is proposed to build within the boundaries of the catchment area: consider sources, selection, quality, loss, reuse and natural runoff. The goal is access to water for the population, nature, agriculture and industry.

The main modules are basin management and a digital model of the water system, protection of drinking sources, loss reduction and nature-like cleaning. The restoration works cover rivers, floodplains, lakes, swamps and groundwater supply.

The decisions must preserve the catchment itself.

The result is checked by the quality of drinking water, losses in networks and canals, the state of groundwater and compliance with environmental runoff.

The first pilot - "Living watershed": one swimming pool, a general registry, monitoring, restoration activities and agreements of all water users.

At the start, the initial state is fixed.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Clean air

Source status: Public film library

A short film about monitoring air quality and why caring for the environment is connected to caring for people.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The sixth area of the New World Order is “Air”.

Air quality is proposed to be associated with transport, heating, industry, natural fires, planning and green areas.

The basis of the decisions is the actual impact of pollution on people and territory, confirmed by verified observational data.

Practical modules are a distributed network of sensors, measurement verification, source accounting and impact reduction scenarios.

Cleaner heat, transport and production technologies are provided, as well as a system of green and water spaces to protect against dust, smoke and overheating.

Targets of verification are the impact of pollutants on the population, the number of days of adverse air, the proportion of proven sources and the speed of response.

The first pilot, Clean Air, Healthy City, connects sensors, medical and environmental analytics, targeted measures, and a public report.

The beginning is the initial data and the pilot’s passport.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Biotic communities

Source status: Public film library

Habitats, species, and ecological connections help to see a living area as a whole, rather than a set of individual objects.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The seventh area of the New World Order is “Biotic Communities”, meaning living communities.

It is proposed to manage the connectivity of habitats, food chains, water and soils, taking into account the economic load. The goal is a continuous natural network that supports pollination, self-purification and landscape sustainability.

Practical modules - a map of communities and ecological corridors, permanent observation points and data for long periods.

Actions include habitat restoration, control of invasive species, and checking the compatibility of economic activity with the natural cycles of the territory.

Measurable landmarks include habitat connectivity, the state of key species and communities, the quality of ecosystem functions, and the success of recovery.

The first pilot, the Living Landscape, connects watersheds, soils, pollinators, forests, farmland, and settlements. Before launch, the initial state is fixed, a responsible person is appointed and the pilot’s passport is prepared.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Food

Source status: Public film library

Food quality and reliability of supply are considered together - from production to people's everyday needs.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The eighth direction of the New World Order is “Food”.

It is proposed to link production, processing, storage, transportation and daily meals into a common system. Its goal is affordable, safe and nutritious food with understandable origins, while preserving resources for future production.

Practical modules include product origin verification, local supply chains, warehouses and reserves, and loss-reduction processing.

A separate task is the quality of nutrition in schools, medical institutions, the social sphere and at work.

Evaluate the work you need on the adequacy of diets, the availability of healthy food, losses and safety violations.

The first pilot - "Healthy food of the territory": from soil and agriculture through processing to the institution and family.

It is based on a single passport of quality and origin.

The initial step is to confirm the initial data and appoint a person responsible.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Biofarm and Territory

Source status: Public film library

The modular biofarm concept connects production, local resources and environmental monitoring within a shared territorial system.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

What if a farm can be arranged as a living organism?

Where nothing is wasted: the waste of one production becomes raw material for another, water goes in a circle, energy is produced on the spot, and people from the surrounding villages get a job and profession. This is a cooperative project called Biofarm.

Biofarm is a modular system. The word “modular” is key.

Not a giant plant that is built for ten years, but a set of blocks: production, processing, energy, water, training.

The blocks are connected to each other like parts of a designer, and each has a measurable input and output.

How many resources went in, how much product came out, how much it cost.

The economy without fog.

But the project has a second half, and it is no less important.

It's called biocenosis.

If the Biofarm answers the question "how to produce", then Biocenosis - the question "what happens to the earth".

They usually say about nature with slogans: “preserve”, “protect”, “in harmony”.

The cooperative approaches differently — it suggests nature to measure.

State of the soil.

Water quality. Biodiversity.

Pressure on the territory and its ability to recover.

First, the starting point is fixed - as it is now.

And then regular measurements show: getting better or worse.

Not according to the data.

Two projects are in the ring.

The farm works - sensors and laboratories make sure that the production does not destroy what it stands for.

Closed cycles reduce both costs and the burden on nature.

But there’s a condition: Stream closure is only useful if it doesn’t pile up pollution and hidden problems.

Therefore, it will not be the project creators themselves who will check the result - an independent party gives an assessment of the environmental and social effect.

And for people on the ground, this means the simplest and most important thing: jobs near the house, training in modern specialties, living territory instead of the empty Village, which again has tomorrow.

An economy that heals the earth, not cripples it.

Sounds like a dream - and is built as a project: with passports, measurements and responsible.

In the next video, the topic that is debated the most: money.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

BioFerma Plus

Source status: Public film library

Fish, plants and quail farming come together in a closed-cycle concept where connections between production and the natural environment matter.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Imagine a pond. An ordinary pond, what thousands.

There's not a single thing left in this pond.

None at all.

For one, it’s rubbish, for another, it’s lunch.

Sounds like a fairy tale? This is a project called BioFarm Plus.

Now let me explain how it works, on your fingers.

Let’s start with fish. The pond is home to trout, sturgeon and sterlet.

Beautiful, expensive, capricious.

And like all living beings, they do what all living beings do.

Waste gets into the water - nitrogen, phosphorus, organic matter.

In conventional fisheries, this is a problem. Water must be cleaned, filtered, changed.

It's money, technology, chemistry.

Now, look what they came up with here.

Plants swim in the same pond.

Water hyacinth - in the scientific eichornia - and duckweed.

You know what they do?

They eat it. Literally.

All that fish has thrown into the water, plants suck roots and grow on it.

And they work better than any filter: they remove more than ninety-five percent of ammonia and nitrates from the water.

The water is clean. The fish is pleased. Electricity for cleaning is zero.

But plants grow. There's a lot of them. Where to put this green mass?

There is a third participant - quail.

The rice goes to their feed.

The quail gives the egg and meat. And, of course, the litter.

And now, the most interesting.

Because all this "junk": extra plants, litter, or from the bottom - all this is sent to a special installation.

It grinds and processes biomass into a thick dark liquid.

It's called humic concentrate. Simply put, fertilizer.

Very good fertilizer that farmers buy.

And part of this fertilizer is returned back - to feed the plants in the pond.

The circle is closed. No waste. At all.

Fish feed the plants. Plants clean water and feed quail.

Quail and plants feed the installation. The plant makes fertilizer.

Fertilizer feeds the plants.

This is called a beautiful word - biocenosis.

A closed system where everyone needs everyone.

Exactly as it is done in nature.

Only collected by a man in one farm.

And you know what's really cool here? That's not fantastic.

Not a single element that doesn’t exist.

Fish have long been bred.

Ryask knows everything. Fertilizers are made in factories.

The genius is to put it together in a chain where nothing goes missing.

By the way, this project is under development.

Not yet built, the figures are being refined, there is a lot of work ahead.

But the idea, the idea works.

And it’s simple: stop dividing the world into “product” and “waste.”

There is no waste in nature. Looks like we should learn.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Energy Supply for the Territory

Source status: Public film library

Microgrids, storage and load management are presented as elements of a possible sustainable power supply system.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The ninth area of the New World Order is “Energy”.

Energy supply is proposed to be estimated by reliability, availability, resource consumption and the full cost of the life cycle.

The impact on human health and the burden of tariffs on families and businesses are also important.

It is about the coordinated work of the entire system.

Its modules are energy efficient buildings and production, distributed generation, microgrids, storage and reserves.

Load management is associated with the possibilities of energy sources.

The testable benchmarks are the duration of breaks, the energy intensity of the result, the proportion of managed local capacity and the full environmental footprint.

The first pilot is the “New Order Energy Hub”.

It should connect generation, accumulation, heat, water, agriculture and industrial consumer. Start with a status map, baseline measurements and a responsible owner, then prepare a pilot’s passport with independent verification.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Provable Clean Energy

Source status: Public film library

An introduction to the ECO-PPA approach: connecting an energy project, a measured result and protection against double counting.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The word "environmentally" today is written on anything from a package of milk to a gas station.

It is usually impossible to check it.

The cooperative offers a different approach: let clean energy have a passport of origin.

The product is called ECO-PPA. The acronym is a simple idea.

There is a generator that produces energy.

There is a buyer who consumes it.

Between them are meters, an accounting operator and an independent examiner.

Each kilowatt hour is traced from the source to the outlet.

The environmental effect is not declared - it is measured and confirmed by a foreign, disinterested expert.

And the iron rule: no "green" unit is counted twice.

It all begins not with a loud presentation, but with a pilot, one generator, one buyer, one or three months of work, a real paid delivery. First prove it on small, then expand.

The same principle applies to the reporting of benefits to society.

The standard is called ESG-IR: ecology, social effect, management, impact, sustainability.

Usually these reports are glossy booklets.

On the contrary, each indicator must have proof.

Register of data, independent conclusion, open rating methodology.

And now, the main tool on which it rests.

Ladder of evidence. Imagine the six steps.

Below are just the words: “I have the technology”, “our project is useful”.

The level above is the documents. Even higher is the independent examination.

Next is legal registration. And only at the top of the statement receives the status of proven.

Important subtlety: not the whole project rises up the stairs, but each separate statement.

The right can stand already high, technical productivity is in the middle, and the economy is only at the foot.

And everyone can see that.

There is no such thing as "believe in the word" - there is a conclusion, here is the date, here is the signature.

Why such meticulousness?

Because the pyramids are built on promises, and the enterprises are built on evidence.

When you are promised the golden mountains, hold on to your wallet.

When the counters, seals and signatures of experts are shown, you have people who are building seriously.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

ECO-PPA for industry

Source status: Public film library

From assessing an enterprise to a proposed pilot: the film explains the logic of environmental modernisation and verification of its results.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The industry needs modernization, which at the same time reduces costs, strengthens energy supply and gives a confirmed environmental effect.

ECO-PPA Russia proposes to combine these tasks into one managed model.

Today, the company is forced to work separately with the bank, energy, technology suppliers, environmentalists and consultants.

Everyone is responsible for their site, and the risk that everything will not turn out in a single result remains with the enterprise.

Eco-PAP is a long-term contractual model that integrates energy, technology, ecology, capital, data, and trust.

The company receives not a set of disparate equipment, but a predetermined and measurable result.

The funding logic is also changing.

At the center of the solution is not the cost of the equipment itself, but its ability to create a steady cash flow, savings and confirmed effect throughout the life cycle of the RSPP forms an industry request, connects profile expertise and helps to choose the first enterprise.

IGO "SPECZASHCHITA" organizes project cooperation, bringing together manufacturers, engineers, suppliers and service organizations responsible for implementation.

EQUILIBRIUM creates a digital passport of the enterprise, compares capital and operating costs, risks and key indicators.

SFERA unites professional, scientific and regional communities and helps to distribute only those solutions whose results have already been confirmed.

The first demonstration circuit is tentatively estimated at two hundred and sixty million rubles.

One hundred and thirty million is provided for eco-modules and another one hundred and thirty for mini-generation.

The final configuration will be determined after the survey of a particular enterprise.

The success of the pilot is checked by the facts: whether the technology works, whether the economy converges, whether the contractual model is feasible, whether the data is collected automatically and whether it is possible to independently confirm the achieved result of the chain of evidence is transparent: the starting point, primary data, methodology, calculation, key indicators, validation and verification.

Thus, the report becomes not a declaration, but the basis for an investment decision and further scaling.

It is not necessary to approve a specific technology or make investment commitments in advance.

The next step is to create a working group, select an enterprise for diagnosis and prepare the first project of ECO-PPA.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Materials

Source status: Public film library

The properties, testing and reuse of materials help link engineering choices with more careful handling of resources.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The tenth area of the New World Order is “Materials”.

It is proposed to build technological chains from raw materials and development to testing, finished products, repair and return of resources to production.

The goal is durable, safe and critical materials with proven properties.

The modules include technical ceramics, composite materials, and synthetic crystals, including diamond, leukosapphire, and bianite.

Critical materials, secondary raw materials, testing centres, standards and digital passports are also needed.

Benchmarks - material intensity of products, service life, maintainability, return of resources to the cycle and time from laboratory to qualification.

The first pilot is an interdepartmental material science platform.

It has a register of needs, samples and tests associated with specific products and production complexes. The initial step is to appoint the owner of the direction and confirm the baseline.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Industry

Source status: Public film library

The product, suppliers and production cycle are considered as an interconnected system in which shared results begin with coordinated work.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The eleventh area of the New World Order is “Industry”.

The starting point is proposed to make a specific product and the need for the territory.

Under this task, materials, equipment, specialists, energy and suppliers are connected.

Production complexes should cover the entire life cycle: design, production, maintenance, repair and modernization.

Practical modules include a map of production links, a register of fifty complexes, robotization and flexible production cells.

Digital specifications help build cooperation and quality control.

A separate unit is the restoration of products and reuse.

You need to measure the performance, the sustainability of the supplier chain, the time of withdrawal of the product and the share of repair.

The first pilot is one New Order Complex.

For him, the customer’s need is revealed in a complete tree of materials, equipment, personnel and suppliers. The starting decision is to appoint the owner, confirm the initial data and prepare a passport.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Transport

Source status: Public film library

People’s journeys and freight movements are presented as the basis for territorial connectivity, access to services and everyday convenience.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The twelfth area of the New World Order is “Transport”.

It is proposed to consider passenger travel and cargo movement as a single system of accessibility, security and development of territories.

In it, the route of a person and the supply for the enterprise are estimated by time, cost, reliability and the impact on nature.

The main modules are corridors and hubs that unite different types of transport, public transport for small territories, intellectual logistics and cargo management.

New materials, robotization and maintenance of equipment throughout her life are associated with them. Proven benchmarks are trip predictability, logistics costs, territory availability, accident rate and energy intensity of transportation.

The first pilot is the Development Corridor: an industrial core, a science center, an agro-belt, a city and a transportation hub for exports.

The start of work is the initial status card, the responsible owner and the pilot’s passport.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Cities and settlement

Source status: Public film library

A vision of an environment where accessible services, reliable infrastructure and attention to local connections support quality of life.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

The thirteenth area of the New World Order is “Cities and Settlement”.

The settlement is proposed to be designed as a healthy environment of everyday life.

Housing, services, public spaces, nature and engineering networks must work in concert. This applies to large cities, small settlements and rural areas.

The modules include a scheme for placing productive forces up to two thousand and fifty, social infrastructure, landscaping, water spaces and microclimate management. Special attention is paid to the revival of small towns and villages, centers of knowledge and production.

The result is assessed by the availability of basic services, reliability of infrastructure, housing, access to nature and satisfaction of residents.

The first pilot - "Healthy city, a living village": a general master plan with nineteen balances and a digital passport of the territory.

The first step is to appoint the owner of the destination, confirm the initial data and prepare the pilot.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Taman City and the Kuban Delta

Source status: Public film library

The concept connects the urban environment, restoration of water bodies and sturgeon farming in a shared view of the development of the Kuban delta.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Imagine the morning by the sea. The light enters the open window, the road to the school passes through the garden, and after work you can go to the embankment.

Taman City begins with this image: the idea of a city in which everyday life, work and nature support each other.

There are three documents before us: the Taman City business plan, the “Revival of the Kuban Delta” programme, and an architectural concept within the “New Order” project. Together they describe the interconnected development of the area.

The city provides people with housing and a living environment.

Water restoration, production and tourism form another part of this plan.

The city business plan includes fifty thousand residents and two million fifty thousand square meters of housing. Residential buildings are assumed to be no more than five floors high. This is the scale of a full-fledged city that needs its own schools, medicine, jobs, public transport and reliable engineering networks.

At the neighborhood level, the big idea becomes very simple.

Near the house there is a kindergarten, a shop, a small area and a shady path. The architectural concept focuses on fifteen minutes of pedestrian accessibility.

Green corridors connect areas so that walking remains part of the normal day, rather than a rare out-of-town trip.

Taman City offers its own architectural language.

Warm terracotta, natural stone, wood and ceramics coexist with glass.

Arches and balconies are reminiscent of southern cities, smooth lines - about waves and shells. Green roofs and rainwater harvesting complement this image with a concern for resources.

The planning center of the architectural concept is the lake and the public square. From them diverge boulevards, and parks are connected in a continuous network. The canals are designed as part of the city’s water system.

This solution requires the concerted work of architects and engineers: the beauty of the space should be combined with sustainable water exchange and flood protection.

For future residents, the business plan provides for eight schools, twelve kindergartens, two polyclinics and a multidisciplinary hospital.

The stated benchmark is about fifteen thousand jobs in the city.

Training, service availability and housing construction must move together so that new neighborhoods are filled with life from the start.

A special place is occupied by housing for employees of enterprises.

The authors propose a mechanism in which, after a long work, a person receives housing in the property, and the costs are paid through the consortium fund. For the family, the meaning of this approach is the ability to make long-term plans. Specific conditions will require transparent contracts and clear obligations of the parties.

The sea facade of the city is a embankment with a length of more than seven kilometers.

The project connects beaches, walking routes, bike paths, cafes and hotels. It is important the rhythm of space: somewhere you can stop by the water, somewhere spend the evening with friends, and somewhere to find a quiet area for a leisurely walk.

The economic base of Taman City is associated with industrial, port, logistics and tourist destinations.

The “New Order” materials envisage using a shared resource base: energy, fuel and building materials.

The idea is for enterprises to support the development of the city, and a high-quality urban environment to help attract and retain specialists.

Now let’s move beyond city blocks.

In front of us are estuaries, straits, reed banks and open water.

"Revival of the Kuban Delta" considers the territory of eighty thousand hectares.

Here, the protagonist becomes water: its movement, quality and ability to support the complex life of the coastal ecosystem.

The document describes changes in freshwater runoff and water exchange violations.

The proposed program links the clearing of waterways with the restoration of conditions for fish and its feed base. This means attention to the entire system: from the movement of water and bottom organisms to the habitats of young and the state of coastal vegetation.

The engineering part of the project provides for canals, pumping stations, locks and coastal protection. For dredging, its own fleet of dredgers is expected. The scale of intervention is large, so the sequence of work should be based on the survey of the territory, calculations of the water regime and monitoring of changes in the ecosystem at each stage.

One of the central directions is fifteen sturgeon plants with closed water supply facilities. In such complexes, water is purified and returned to the production cycle. The project combines the cultivation of commercial products and the reproduction of sturgeon.

These are different tasks that require separate indicators of quality, power and result.

The authors set a benchmark: annually produce up to twenty-five million copies of young sturgeon. But the meaning of recovery is revealed after release.

You need to understand how fish survive, where they find food and how the population changes.

Therefore, the concept provides for monitoring and scientific support linking the work of plants with the life of water bodies.

The production system is supplemented by feed mills.

The materials discuss new feed components and increasing the efficiency of cultivation. Behind this part of the project are laboratories, fish nutrition specialists and production control.

A sustainable result consists of many daily actions: checking water, fish health, feed quality and equipment.

Another direction is the processing of sapropel, bottom sediments, considered by the authors as a raw material base. The project includes three processing complexes. Possible products are related to agriculture and other industries.

Before use, studies of the composition and suitability of specific raw materials are needed: a useful production cycle begins with a confirmed quality.

For the Delta program, the creation of more than seven thousand jobs was announced.

These are specialists in fish farming, processing, hydraulic engineering, tourism and service. For the territory, the employment chain is important: training, first job, professional growth and the opportunity to live nearby.

The environmental project is connected with the everyday prospects of local residents.

The tourist part was called "Cuban Venice".

The authors offer island routes, hotels and eco-paths connecting acquaintance with nature and rest by the water. Such an image requires careful design: convenient places of visit should take into account sensitive areas of the ecosystem, so that interest in the delta helps to preserve its value.

In the proposed future, one day can connect different experiences: a morning walk in Taman City, an acquaintance with fish farming, a water route and an evening by the sea. The city and natural area complement each other. The guest has a whole history of the place - its water, work, cuisine, architecture and people who live here.

The transition from concept to construction begins with the harmonization of the initial data.

Research, project documentation, decisions on land and infrastructure, identification of participants and sources of funds are needed.

Then, the order of objects. Housing, utilities, social facilities and production facilities should be introduced in a coordinated manner, supporting each other’s work.

For the “Revival of the Kuban Delta” the document indicates a ten-year horizon: from two thousand twenty-sixth to two thousand thirty-sixth years. The practical meaning of step-by-step is to first test the solutions on the prepared sites, then evaluate the result and develop the next queues taking into account the experience gained and available resources.

For residents, success will be seen in specific things.

You can find a job, get medical care, arrange a child in the garden and conveniently get home. For the delta, water quality, habitat status and the results of fish reproduction are important. It is such observed changes that allow us to compare a big idea with real life.

The presented materials describe the project at different levels: from the artistic image to production and financial calculations.

There are differences in areas and economic indicators between the versions.

The next step is to bring them together into a single coherent model where architectural solutions, environmental challenges, timelines, and financial capabilities are tested together.

Within the logic of these documents, the “New Order” emerges through the connections between its parts: production meets the area’s needs, the city creates conditions for people, and the restoration of nature supports long-term development.

The effectiveness of this link depends on the specific decisions and responsibilities of the participants.

Each element should have its own purpose and measurable contribution to the overall result.

Taman City and the revival of the Kuban Delta combine the dream of a beautiful city with the task of careful development of the whole region.

Ahead is the work that turns the image into proven solutions.

And the landmark remains human: home, a favorite thing, living water and a place where you want to return. This is the future that the authors of the projects propose.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

Safe Area

Source status: Public film library

A family plan, service reserves and recovery after disruptions are presented as parts of a proposed system of territorial resilience.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

Safety starts with simple things. There is water and light at home.

You can contact your loved ones and get help.

Children are protected. And if there was a disaster, people know who will help and how to return to normal life.

This is what the New World Order is all about: security.

Its author is Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov. This is a proposal for discussion and verification in practice. The main idea is to notice the danger earlier, to preserve important services and help people recover.

Services that have the appropriate authority must be in place.

At the international level, the same idea means cooperation for peace.

Discuss disagreements, prevent conflicts, fulfill agreements and help victims together. The image of the Security Council expresses these principles: respect for countries, dialogue and shared responsibility for people.

What does it look like in everyday life? Let's get the tap water.

It needs electricity, proper pumps, specialists and delivery of materials. It's all connected. If you see these connections in advance, it is easier to understand where a failure may occur and what needs to be prepared.

Let's say there's a power outage in the area.

Pumps, communication and equipment of the clinic can stop.

Therefore, it is determined in advance who first needs a reserve, who will connect it and who will repair it. The goal is clear: to preserve people’s access to the necessary services.

All five levels participate: person, family, organization, territory and country together with partners. The family agrees on how to contact. The organization is preparing a contingency plan.

Local services agree on assistance. General rules help us to work together.

The project has nineteen balances. This is the name given to interconnected aspects of life: health, water, housing, work, nature, infrastructure and others.

The point is simple: improving one thing, you need to consider the consequences for the rest.

And check whether people’s rights and access to assistance remain.

The action is in seven steps. Watching.

Notice the signal. Check him out. Make a decision.

Protect people and react. Restoring the job.

Then analyze the experience and improve the training.

Every decision should be responsible, and the result should be confirmation.

The first signals can come from specialists, equipment and residents.

They are checked and compared with other sources.

If there is little data, they talk about it directly. In the proposed system, important decisions, especially restrictions, are made by an authorized person.

A voluntary security passport is offered for the family.

In fact, this is an understandable family plan: who to call, where to meet, who will help children and the elderly, where the necessary documents are located.

The family decides whether to participate. Their information is protected, they can be changed or deleted.

Water, communication and other important services also need a plan.

In the project, it is called a passport of critical function.

It records what the service depends on, how long the break can last, what is the reserve and who is responsible for recovery.

When a failure occurs, you need a general record of the event - an incident card. What happened? Who needs help?

Who does what? What resources are available?

What has already been restored? Such a record helps the services to coordinate actions and verify the result.

It is important for people to get clear messages. What do we know exactly?

Who is the event for? What to do now and where to look for help?

When will the new information come out? You need feedback to hear those who have not yet reached the help.

The backup plan is also checked in advance. Is the generator available?

Is there another route, supplier or change of employees?

Are copies of the data saved? Who is in charge of the reserve?

Preparation is useful when all this can be used on time.

Digital tools help gather information.

The nine registers are linked sections where you can trace the path from the first observation to the decision, action, and result.

Conclusions should have sources and explanations.

The responsibility remains with the person.

The security system must also protect people’s rights.

Therefore, the project provides for the collection of only the necessary data, restriction of access and independent verification. Measures must be risk-appropriate and reviewed. Hidden family ratings, discrimination and automatic sanctions are unacceptable.

Check the approach is offered in the pilot "Safe territory - a thousand".

Planning targets: three different areas, up to a thousand profiles in each, a hundred important functions and facilities, fifty joint scenarios, and ten comprehensive exercises. The time frame is thirty-six months. These are proposed parameters, to be refined after the conditions and resources have been assessed.

During the first hundred days, the participants and their responsibilities, the rules for working with data, and the most vulnerable points are identified. Alerting, reserves and joint actions are then tested. Expansion of the project is proposed after the results have been assessed and people’s rights protected.

Success is visible in everyday life: the danger was noticed earlier, help came, water and communication work, the consequences are eliminated.

And after each difficult event, people better understand how to prepare for the next.

Thus, security becomes a common concern and understandable work.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

ORION 22:22 — Heritage Preservation Archive

Source status: Public film library

Memory, the provenance of sources and the right to pass on knowledge come together in the concept of a heritage preservation archive.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published subtitle text. Timecodes and adjacent repeated lines have been removed, and phrases have been combined into paragraphs for reading.

Open on the site

In documents, discoveries, photographs and human stories, the experience of generations is preserved.

To preserve it is to preserve the ability to learn, to understand your past and to create your future.

ORION22:22. Heritage Preservation Archive.

We are creating a space in which knowledge, documents, scientific and cultural experience can be preserved along with their history and transmitted to future generations.

The basis of architecture — 22 Functions and 22 measurable results.

For the Archive, this means paying attention to each stage of heritage work: from the description and preservation of the material to its search, study and further application.

We present a scientific document from the collection of the Institute.

It is important to preserve the material itself, to establish its origin, to indicate the author and the time of creation, to describe the content and conditions of access.

Thus, the document receives the context necessary for the future researcher.

The next step is to make the heritage available for search and study.

The researcher finds the topic, opens the description, sees the source and related materials.

The saved history of changes helps to understand how the record was formed and what information it relies on.

Heritage continues to live in education, science, culture and new projects.

ORION architecture connects knowledge with development directions.

19 linked balances help to see where the accumulated experience can benefit the person and the territory.

Heritage preservation archive linked to common ORION system: EQUILIBRIUM, SFERA and project programs. Preserved knowledge can become the basis of decisions, and new experience can return to the Archive and replenish the general memory.

The institute can offer a scientific collection.

The organization is the documents of its history.

Family - photos and memories.

Expert - help with description and verification.

In the center of the Archive is a person, his contribution and the connection of generations.

ORION22:22. Preserve the legacy.

We pass on knowledge. We create the future.

Join us in creating the Heritage Preservation Archive.

Published files

Films and performances · Full published text

What the cooperative's portfolio holds

Source status: Public film library

From technology and small-scale energy generation to digital platforms: an introduction to the stated portfolio of the shared endeavour. Learn how object profiles and step-by-step verification help turn ideas into prepared projects.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published text transcript from the film card.

Open on the site

Let us open the most interesting part of the White Paper: the inventory of what participants have contributed to the shared endeavour. There is plenty here to spark excitement. But the cooperative has a rule: first show it, then explain how it can be verified.

So, what is in the portfolio? A property complex in Blagoveshchensk: administrative buildings and land plots. Industrial waste dumps — man-made mountains of waste from older industries that may still contain valuable metals. A raw material processing technology and installation reportedly already tested abroad. A range of small-scale energy systems, from watt-class units to industrial installations. Digital platforms and portals. A natural disaster forecasting system. And a body of documentation: scientific materials, technical specifications and draft patent applications — many years of work.

Impressive? It is. Now for what distinguishes a cooperative from people with grand but impractical schemes.

Each item on this list receives its own record. It contains questions, not advertising adjectives. Who owns it? What evidence supports that? What condition is it in? What has already been demonstrated, and what is still only claimed?

Take the waste dumps. “Mountains full of metal” sounds appealing. But a right to the land is not necessarily a right to what lies on it. Rumoured metal content is not the same as laboratory test results. And gross value is not profit: subtract extraction, processing, logistics and taxes, and the figure changes beyond recognition. That is why the asset record requires samples, documents and calculations.

Or take the processing technology. In conversation, it sounds like a single whole. In practice, three things need separating: the installation as physical equipment, the method as intellectual property and the test results as facts. Each may have its own owner and its own future.

The entire portfolio uses a readiness scale: idea — documentation — prototype — tested — operational. Moving up a step requires verified criteria, and an asset’s overall status is determined by its weakest link. Boasting about a strength while hiding a weakness will not work here.

The cooperative’s portfolio is not a display window. It is a workbench where every item is picked up, examined and checked.

Published files

  • Film (MP4)
    https://speczashchita.com/media/films/wb-3-portfel.mp4

Films and performances · Full published text

EQUILIBRIUM — the cooperative's digital home

Source status: Public film library

Object profiles, personal account areas and a history of decisions form a vision of a shared digital home. The film explains the EQUILIBRIUM concept: an environment where shared data helps people act together.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published text transcript from the film card.

Open on the site

Where do agreements usually disappear? Into private messages. Into someone’s folder on a desk. Into memory — “we decided that back then”. A year passes, and no one remembers who contributed what or on which terms. Even the best initiatives can die this way.

The cooperative tackles this problem at its root. The entire shared endeavour lives in one digital environment, called EQUILIBRIUM — meaning “balance”. It is not a website or a folder of files. It is a digital record of everything the cooperative has: assets, rights, participants, projects, documents and decisions.

How does it work when explained in human terms?

Every item has its own digital profile. A land plot, a technology, a programme or a member’s contribution receives a unique number and record: what it is, who owns it, what evidence supports it and its condition. Like a medical record, but for assets.

Every figure has a source. Where did the number come from? Who supplied it? Which document supports it? Has it been verified, or is it still only a claim? No figures plucked from thin air.

Every participant has a personal workspace. You sign in and see: here is my contribution, here is its status, and here are the documents and decisions concerning it. There is no need to call anyone and plead for information. No need to take anyone’s word for it.

The platform’s vision is broad: its target map includes nineteen systems and thirteen directions, with hundreds of modules. Here, too, the cooperative stays true to its approach: no one declares it all finished. First comes the essential core: participants, assets, rights, documents and decisions. Next, a pilot with real projects. Expansion follows only when benefits are confirmed. A house is built from its foundations, not its weather vane.

Another fundamental point is security and an unalterable history. The platform holds sensitive information, so access follows the principle of “only what is necessary”. Decision records cannot be erased retrospectively: when something changes, a new record is created with a link to the old one.

Trust between people is fragile. The cooperative therefore builds it on architecture, not words: the system prevents unnoticed replacement, erasure or rewriting. A balance of interests secured through technology.

Published files

  • Film (MP4)
    https://speczashchita.com/media/films/wb-4-ekvilibrium.mp4

Films and performances · Full published text

An honest kilowatt-hour and the ladder of proof

Source status: Public film library

Trace the path of clean energy from source to consumer and see what evidence supports its impact. A clear introduction to the ECO-PPA concept, data recording and step-by-step verification of results.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published text transcript from the film card.

Open on the site

Today, “eco-friendly” is printed on almost anything, from a milk carton to a petrol pump. Usually, the claim cannot be checked. The cooperative proposes a different approach: give clean energy a record of origin.

The product is called ECO-PPA. Behind the abbreviation is a simple idea. A generator produces energy, and a buyer consumes it. Between them are meters, a metering operator and an independent reviewer. Every kilowatt-hour is traceable from the source to the socket. Environmental impact is not merely declared: it is measured and confirmed by an external expert with no vested interest. And there is a firm rule: no “green” unit is counted twice.

It all begins not with a grand presentation, but with a pilot: one generator, one buyer, one to three months of operation and actual paid supply. First prove it on a small scale, then expand.

The cooperative applies the same principle to reporting on benefits to society. The standard is called ESG-IR: environment, social impact, governance, impact and sustainability. Such reports are usually glossy brochures. Here, the approach is the opposite: every indicator must have evidence. A data register, an independent opinion and an open rating methodology.

And now for the main tool that holds it all together: the evidence ladder. Imagine six steps. At the bottom are mere words: “I have a technology”, “our project is useful”. One step up are documents. Higher still is independent expert review. Next comes legal formalisation. Only at the top does a claim gain the status of proven.

There is an important distinction: it is not the whole project that moves up the ladder, but each individual claim. A right may already be high up, technical performance halfway up and the economics still at the bottom. Everyone can see this. There is no “take our word for it”; there is “here is the expert opinion, here is the date, here is the signature”.

Why be so meticulous? Because pyramid schemes are built on promises, while enterprises are built on evidence. When someone promises you mountains of gold, hold on to your wallet. When they show you meters, seals and experts’ signatures, you are dealing with people who are serious about building.

Published files

  • Film (MP4)
    https://speczashchita.com/media/films/wb-5-eco-ppa.mp4

Films and performances · Full published text

BioFerma and Biocenosis — an economy that heals the land

Source status: Public film library

A farm as an interconnected system of production, water, energy and knowledge. The film introduces a proposed model combining closed resource flows, care for the territory and assessment of environmental results.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published text transcript from the film card.

Open on the site

What if a farm could function like a living organism? Where nothing goes to waste: waste from one production process becomes raw material for another, water circulates, energy is generated locally, and people from neighbouring villages gain jobs and a profession. This is not a fantasy. It is a cooperative project called Biofarm.

Biofarm is a modular system. “Modular” is the key word. Not a giant industrial complex that takes ten years to build, but a set of units: production, processing, energy, water and training. The units fit together like pieces of a construction kit, and each has measurable inputs and outputs. How many resources went in, how much product came out and how much it cost. Economics without the fog.

But the project has a second half that is no less important. It is called Biotic Community. While Biofarm answers “how to produce”, Biotic Community answers “what happens to the land in the process”.

People usually talk about nature in slogans: “preserve”, “protect”, “in harmony”. The cooperative takes a different approach: it proposes measuring nature. Soil condition. Water quality. Biodiversity. Pressure on the land and its ability to recover. First, a baseline is recorded: the state of things now. Regular measurements then show whether things are improving or deteriorating. Not through impressions, but through data.

Here, the two projects form a loop. The farm operates while sensors and laboratories monitor it to ensure production does not destroy its foundations. Closed cycles reduce both costs and pressure on nature. But there is a condition: closing resource flows is beneficial only if it does not accumulate pollutants and hidden problems. That is why the project’s creators will not verify the results themselves: an independent party assesses the environmental and social impact.

For local people, this means the simplest and most important things: jobs close to home, training in modern occupations and a thriving area instead of an emptying one. A village with a future again.

An economy that heals the land instead of harming it. It sounds like a dream, but it is built as a project: with profiles, measurements and people responsible.

Published files

  • Film (MP4)
    https://speczashchita.com/media/films/wb-6-bioferma-biotsenoz.mp4

Films and performances · Full published text

The cooperative's money: why pretty figures are not taken on faith

Source status: Public film library

From confirmed contributions to reserves and distribution of results: a clear path through the cooperative’s financial model. The film centres on open rules, verifiable calculations and respect for the shared endeavour.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

Published text transcript from the film card.

Open on the site

Big numbers always surround major endeavours. And do you know what the cooperative does with them? It stamps them “claimed — not confirmed”. Any amount here is only a guide until it has been verified. Boring? Perhaps. But this is the only financial model that does not end in a scandal.

Let us explain its foundations in simple terms.

First. Money spent is not money earned. Participants have invested in development for years, and it is important to record those costs: the contract, period and result. But investing a million does not automatically create an asset worth a million. You can invest a million in something worth a hundred thousand, or use a hundred thousand to create something worth millions. What counts is the result, not the receipt.

Second. A valuation answers four questions. What exactly is being valued? Who owns the right? As of what date, and using what method, was the calculation made? Which part is confirmed and which is an assumption? Without those answers, a figure is just an attractive number. With them, it becomes a working tool.

Third. The reserve fund is the safety cushion for the shared endeavour. It has strict rules: a designated purpose, limits and prohibitions, separate accounting and independent oversight. The main prohibition is that reserves cannot be distributed as freely available profit. A safety cushion is not there to be consumed.

Fourth. All settlements go through lawful financial infrastructure: a bank, official payments and verifiable transactions. No notebooks or envelopes.

Fifth, and most important for every participant: results are distributed according to a waterfall principle. Money comes from an actual project and flows through stages known in advance: first obligations and costs, then reserves, then distribution among participants according to confirmed contributions. The order is known before the first rouble arrives. Not afterwards. Before.

What is the point of all this rigour? Respect for people. Promising is easy. Showing where money will come from, how it will be calculated and in what order it will be distributed: that is honesty in numbers.

Published files

  • Film (MP4)
    https://speczashchita.com/media/films/wb-7-finmodel.mp4

Films and performances · Card and available sources

A pond where nothing goes to waste

Source status: Public film library

Fish, aquatic plants, quail and processing come together in one biological system. Explore the BioFarm Plus concept, where flows of water and nutrients underpin a closed production cycle.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

This film has no published subtitles or transcript. Only its description and a video link are provided; the full spoken text is not included in the compilation.

Open on the site

Published files

  • Film (MP4)
    https://speczashchita.com/media/films/bioferma-prud.mp4

Films and performances · Card and available sources

Living soil: how black earth is made

Source status: Public film library

What makes soil alive, and how are fertility, humic substances and the farm’s biological system connected? The film explores land restoration through knowledge of natural processes.

Source: https://speczashchita.com/directions#direction-films

This film has no published subtitles or transcript. Only its description and a video link are provided; the full spoken text is not included in the compilation.

Open on the site

Published files

  • Film (MP4)
    https://speczashchita.com/media/films/bioferma-pochva.mp4