Brief annotation
About the document
Set of materials for representing the balance system, EQUILIBRIUM and ECO-PPA at the level of the State Council.
Prezentatsiya_Dyuminu_Gossovet_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.pptx
Downloading the document...
Author's methodology "EQUILIBRIUM"
and design and contract contour ECO-PPA
| Addressee | Assistant to the President of the Russian Federation, Secretary of the State Council of the Russian Federation A. Mr. Dyumin |
|---|---|
| Initiator | Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich |
| Status | Proactive proposal; is not a position of public authorities |
| First step | 90-day expert-analytical testing without capital costs |
| Full Pilot | 12 months; up to 260 million rubles. only after a feasibility study and a separate decision |
Moscow • 27 August 2026
NAVIGATION
Package contents
Requested solution. Organize a working presentation, determine the profile commission and the format of the inter-commission examination, then consider 90-day approbation.
| № | Material | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cover letter | Address address A. Mr. Dyumin |
| 2 | Draft resolution | Safe organizational language for referral to the commission |
| 3 | Summary note for decision | Problem, proposal, constraints, first step |
| 4 | Main report | 19 Balances, Architecture EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA, Intersectoral Model |
| 5 | Passport of a two-stage pilot | 90 Days of Analytics + 12 months of field cycle |
| 6 | Financial framework | The maximum benchmark is up to 260 million rubles. with a mandatory feasibility study |
| 7 | Draft decisions | Recommendations of the Commission and possible formulation of further instructions |
| 8 | Annexes | Passport ECO-PPA, Balance sheet, methodology 19×13×3, regulatory framework |
Three principles of submission
- First, the state task and the interagency gap; then the author’s methodology and tools.
- Not a new power structure or parallel GIS, but a verifiable mechanism for comparing existing data and the consequences of decisions.
- Not a request for immediate funding, but a proposal to conduct an examination, prepare a feasibility study and apply a phased admission gate.
Details to fill in before sending
Outgoing No: __________ • Date: __________ • Contact phone number: __________ • E-mail: __________
Organization/legal status of initiator: ________________________________________________
DOCUMENT 1
Cover letter
Assistant to the President of the Russian Federation,
Secretary of the State Council of the Russian Federation
A. Mr. Dyumin
On consideration of the proposal for the preparation and approbation of the intersectoral system of territorial balances "EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA"
Dear Alexey Gennadievich!
I am sending for preliminary consideration a package of proposals for the creation of an inter-commission analytical mechanism "System of Strategic Balances of the Russian Federation" using the author's methodology "EQUILIBRIUMthe " Project and Contract Outline ECO-PPA.
The method connects 19 resource and performance balance sheets to prior to capital-intensive solution to identify energy, water, human resources, transport, materials and finance deficits. ECO-PPA translates the selected scenario into a project passport with resources, obligations of the parties, KPI, Proof of results and stop criteria. The approach does not replace the powers of authorities, state statistics and existing information systems.
The first step is to offer 90-day expert and analytical testing on existing data, without creating a new federal GIS and without capital costs. Its result is priority balance sheets passports, dependency map, three scenarios, draft passport ECO-PPA and a conclusion on the feasibility of 12-month territorial pilot.
Please consider:
- send materials for expert study to the commission in the direction of "Environmental Well-being" with the involvement, in terms of competence, of commissions on data economy, technological leadership, energy, economics and finance;
- Conduct a working presentation with the participation of the Secretariat of the State Council, interested authorities, the Russian Academy of Sciences and relevant experts;
- to prepare proposals for 90-day testing and, if positive, about the parameters 12-monthly pilot.
Review of the concept does not create budgetary obligations and exclusive rights. The customer, operator, suppliers, financing and independent verifier are determined in the prescribed manner.
Application: package of offers for ____ l. in 1 copies.
With respect,
C. L. Sokolov
Initiator of the project "EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA"
Contact details are filled in before sending • Signature: ____________________
DOCUMENT 2
Draft resolution of the Secretary of State
Working language. It is subject to legal and organizational editing by the Secretariat of the State Council of the Russian Federation.
The Commission of the State Council of the Russian Federation in the field of "Environmental well-being" to consider the submitted materials with the involvement of interested commissions, federal executive authorities, constituent entities of the Russian Federation, scientific and expert organizations and submit to the Secretary of the State Council of the Russian Federation proposals on the feasibility, parameters and conditions of possible pilot testing.
Recommended composition of the result of the study
- conclusion on the compliance of the initiative with the competence and objectives of the relevant commissions;
- a list of existing state systems and data that require compatibility without duplication of functions;
- the specified composition of balance sheets, indicators and demonstration cross-industry chains;
- legal model of data processing, procurement, financing and independent evaluation;
- proposals on the territory, composition of participants, terms, cost and conditions of the pilot’s stop;
- options for further decision: to stop, finalize, conduct a full pilot or prepare the issue for consideration at a higher level.
Proposed period of initial study
Up to 90 calendar days from the date of the organizational decision and the provision of an agreed set of source data.
The resolution does not mean
| Does not mean | Why |
|---|---|
| Approval of the state program | Requires separate decisions and procedures for strategic and budgetary planning |
| Allocation of 260 million rubles | The amount is only a limit reference to the feasibility study |
| Appointment of a private operator | Operator and suppliers are defined by law and applicable procurement procedures |
| Integration with all GIS | Allowed only after coordination with their operators and compliance with safety requirements |
| Compulsory reproduction | Scaling is possible only after independent evaluation of the results |
DOCUMENT 3
Summary note for action
The essence of the proposal. Link the current data to the model of limitations and consequences, and the selected solution to issue through ECO-PPA as a verifiable project with resources, KPI, responsibility and independent verification.
The solution now proposed
- Conduct a working presentation of the project.
- Determine the profile commission and the format of the inter-commission working group.
- Consider 90-day expert-analytical approbation on current data.
Why the Inter-Commission
The industrial project is simultaneously dependent on energy, water, raw materials, transport, personnel and investment. Housing construction - from demography, communal capacity, social infrastructure and income. Environmental solution - from the technological equipment of enterprises, sources of financing and data quality. Industry analysis does not always reveal a complete set of secondary effects.
How the mechanism works
| Stage | Result |
|---|---|
| 1. Signal | The goal, problem, risk or project is fixed in a single passport |
| 2. Balances | Affected resources, territories and restrictions are determined |
| 3. Scripts | Basic, target and stress options are compared |
| 4. Decision | Authorized body chooses option; model does not make power decisions |
| 5. ECO-PPA | The project passport is formed: parties, resources, KPI, evidence, stop criteria |
| 6. Implementation | Operator and suppliers implement the project after legal selection |
| 7. Verification | Independent verifier compares baseline, costs and effect |
What is offered after 90 days
Only with a positive conclusion - to prepare 12-month territorial pilot. The preliminary limit of costs can be up to 260 million rubles: up to 130 million rubles on the ecological technological contour and up to 130 million rubles on the contour of the distributed mini-generation. The amount is specified by the feasibility study and is not a budget obligation.
Expected management impact
- early identification of the deficit before making a capital-intensive decision;
- the visibility of cross-sectoral and interregional consequences;
- a single passport of data, calculations and evidence;
- comparison of the result with the cost and baseline;
- the ability to stop an inefficient pilot before scaling.
MAJOR REPORT
1. State task and legal framework
The State Council of the Russian Federation is a constitutional state body formed by the President of the Russian Federation to ensure the coordinated functioning and interaction of the bodies of the unified system of public power, to determine the main directions of policy and priorities of socio-economic development. The proposed mechanism corresponds to this logic as an instrument of preliminary cross-sectoral and interregional study; it does not create independent powers.
1.1. Normative supports
| Document | Importance for the initiative |
|---|---|
| Federal law of 08.12.2020 № 394-FZ | Status, tasks, functions, working bodies and decisions of the State Council |
| Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 21.12.2020 № 800 | Regulations on working bodies of the State Council and the Secretary |
| Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 22.07.2024 № 613 | 21 Commission on Social and Economic Development |
| Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 29.12.2025 № 1003 | Model provision on the State Council Commission |
| Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 07.05.2024 № 309 | National targets up to 2030 and forward to 2036 |
| Federal law of 28.06.2014 № 172-FZ | Strategic planning system of the Russian Federation |
1.2. Why the existing industry contours are not enough
- indicators are formed in different time, territorial and methodical sections;
- Program objectives are not always checked for resources and capacity at the same time.
- Second-order cross-industry effects are identified already in the course of implementation;
- Data on costs, physical outcome and social impact are often found in different systems;
- The scaling decision can be made before independent proof of effect is available.
Key position. It is not proposed to create another reporting system. It is proposed to link the current state data in the model of limitations and consequences.
2. Proposed strategic balance sheet system
A strategic balance system is a set of interrelated passports, models and rules that allow you to compare the need, available resource, reserve, territorial availability, critical limitations and confirmed result. The working designation of the author's methodology is "EQUILIBRIUM".
2.1. Five layers of model
| Layer | What is connected |
|---|---|
| Earmarked contribution | National goals, state programs, regional strategies, quality of life indicators |
| Resource | People, knowledge, natural resources, capacity, infrastructure, capital and data |
| Interbranch | Flows of products, services, energy, water, materials, labour, transport and finance |
| Territorial | Placement of needs, resources, facilities, risks and reserves |
| Effective | Actual social, economic, environmental and technological effects |
2.2. Unit of analysis
For each balance sheet, account is taken of: stock at the beginning of the period; production or reproduction; incoming and outgoing flows; available capacity; use; loss; mobilized reserve; stock at the end of the period; forecast need; quality and territorial availability of the resource.
Balanced identity. Zᵢ(t+1) = Zᵢ(t) + Pᵢ(t) + Inᵢ(t) − Uᵢ(t) − Outᵢ(t) − Lᵢ(t) ± εᵢ(t). The formula is configured for each object and does not replace industry methods.
The effective offer is calculated taking into account the quality and availability: Seff = S × q × a. Resiliency: M = (Seff + R − D) / D, where R is the mobilized reserve, D is the forecasted need.
3. Architecture "EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA"
Architecture shares observation, calculation, decision making, execution, and effect confirmation. One subject should not simultaneously possess critical data, determine the weights of the model, make a power decision, execute it and confirm the result.
Figure 1. Functional architecture of the pilot
3.1. Division of roles
| Participant | Function | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| State Council / Commission | Strategic review, coordination, recommendations, synthesis of practices | No control over the pilot's funds |
| Secretary of State Council | Organizational coordination of working bodies, materials and agendas | It does not single-handedly approve the program. |
| The Government and the Federal | Regulation, expertise, official data, possible financing decisions | Only within the competence |
| Subject of the Russian Federation | Site, source problem, regional data, permissions and customer with a separate solution | Letter of interest does not equal obligation to finance |
| Russian Academy of Sciences | Scientific and methodological examination of models, indicators and causal relationships | It does not replace state expertise. |
| EQUILIBRIUM / IAC | Methodology, data certification, scenarios, balance sheets | Does not make power decisions |
| ECO-PPA | Project and contract framework: resources, obligations, KPI, evidence, stop criteria | A specific legal model is defined for each project |
| SPECZASHCHITA | Possible cooperation contour of execution and consortia | Without exclusive status; participation in the prescribed manner |
| ESG-IR / independent evaluation | Baseline, verification of data, fact of work and effect | Verifier is not affiliated with the performer |
| SFERA | Communication, collection of initiatives and dissemination of proven practices | It does not replace the official channels of power. |
3.2. Role of GASMP and monitoring
GASMP "EQUILIBRIUM" can be considered as a promising source of observations and forecast signals in the environmental, aerospace and risk-oriented contour. Only authorized sources are used in the pilot; direct connection to state systems is possible after agreement with their operators.
4. ECO-PPA How to translate a decision into execution
Function ECO-PPA. Turn the chosen scenario from an analytical recommendation into a legally, financially and technologically verifiable project.
ECO-PPA is not offered as an independent type of contract, budgetary mechanism or a basis for circumventing the current regulation. This is the framework for the preparation of the project. For each application, the customer, the legal structure, sources of funds, the order of purchase, the distribution of risks, the rights to the results of intellectual activity and the data regime are separately determined.
4.1. Mandatory elements of the passport ECO-PPA
- public and territorial problem; baseline and control zone;
- purpose, measurable result and time frame;
- Affected strategic balances and resource constraints;
- composition of works, equipment and data;
- parties, roles and confirmed powers;
- sources of financing, CAPEX, OPEX and the full cost of ownership;
- KPI with formulas, units, data owners and periodicity;
- stages of admission, stop criteria and procedure for changing the project;
- conditions of independent verification and publicity of results;
- rights to data, models, program code and solution portability;
- procedure for completion, dismantling, transmission or replication.
4.2. Gate of Admission
| Gate | Stage | Transition condition |
|---|---|---|
| G0 | Passport problems | Confirmed territory, baseline, participants and success criteria |
| G1 | Expertise | Obtained legal, technical, scientific and financial-economic conclusions |
| G2 | Readiness | Site, customer, sources of funds, purchase, permissions, information and data are defined |
| G3 | Deployment | Works completed, equipment accepted, measurements valid |
| G4 | Independent evaluation | The effect is confirmed regarding the baseline and control conditions |
| G5 | Decision | Scale, modify, repeat or stop |
Transition to the next stage is allowed only after a positive gate-review. The pilot does not create an obligation to scale.
4.3. Formula of the operating cycle
Cycle. Signal → Balance Diagnostics → script → Decision of the authorized body → Passport ECO-PPA → Legal selection of performers → Implementation → independent verification → adjustment or scaling.
5. 19 Linked Balances System
The list is a project classifier for approbation. It does not introduce new official reporting and can be adjusted based on the results of interdepartmental and scientific expertise. These bodies and organizations are considered exclusively as potential participants and data holders. The distribution of responsibility is possible only by a separate decision.
| № | Balance | Entrances → exits | Key KPI | Potential participants / data |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Demographic balance | Population by cohort, birth, entry → deaths, departures, migration balance | natural movement; OPG; TFR; migration; demographic burden | Ministry of Labor, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Rosstat, RF subjects |
| 2 | Public health and health power balance | Need; personnel, capacity, medicines, finances → help and years of healthy life | Healthy OPG; preventable mortality; personnel; waiting; accessibility | Ministry of Health, Rospotrebnadzor, FFOMS, Roszdravnadzor, Rosstat |
| 3 | Balance of labor resources and competencies | Employable population, graduates, migration, retraining → employment, vacancies, unemployment | Deficit by occupation; employment; structural unemployment; productivity | Ministry of Labor, Rostrud, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Economic Development, Rosstat |
| 4 | Balancing education, science, technology and innovation | Contingents, personnel, funding, laboratories → graduates, research, patents, implementations | Places and personnel; employment; R&D costs; implementations; critical technologies | Ministry of Education, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Rospatent, Rosstat |
| 5 | Balance of income, consumption, savings and social support | Salary, income, transfers → taxes, consumption, savings, debt | Real incomes; poverty; differentiation; debt burden; targeting | Ministry of Labor, Ministry of Finance, FTS, SFR, Rosstat, Bank of Russia — within the competence |
| 6 | Balancing cultural infrastructure and public demand | Institutions, foundations, heritage, personnel, funding → participation, visit, restoration, digital access | Accessibility; participation; heritage status; personnel; digital accessibility | Ministry of Culture, Ministry of Culture, Rosstat, Russian Federation subjects |
| 7 | Food balance | Production, import/import, reserves → processing, consumption, export/export, loss | Self-sufficiency; availability; consumption; reserves; losses | Ministry of Agriculture, Rosselkhoznadzor, Rosrybolovstvo, Minpromtorg, Rosstat |
| 8 | Housing, settlement and infrastructure balance | Housing fund, commissioning, repair; demand; housing and communal services capacity → | m²/person; availability; emergency fund; utilities; construction cycle | Ministry of Construction, Ministry of Economic Development, Rosreestr, Rosstat, subjects of the Russian Federation |
| 9 | Land and soil balance | Land Fund, Inclusion, Remediation → Exemption, Degradation, Pollution, Reclamation | Land use; fertility; degradation; reclamation; cadastre | Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Natural Resources, Rosreestr, Rosselkhoznadzor, Rosleskhoz |
| 10 | Water balance | Stock, stock, fence, negotiable → consumption, discharge, loss | Deficiency; Quality; Losses; Wastewater Treatment; Water Capacity | Ministry of Natural Resources, Rosvodresursy, Roshydromet, Rospotrebnadzor, Rosprirodnadzor, Minstroy |
| 11 | Fuel and energy balance | Production/generation, imports, inventories → conversion, consumption, exports, losses | Power reserve; reliability; network losses; energy intensity; dependence on equipment | Ministry of Energy, Rostechnadzor, FAS, Rosstat, entities and infrastructure organizations |
| 12 | Mineral and material balance | Stocks, extraction, import, recyclables → processing, use, export, waste | Critical raw materials; processing depth; import dependence; material capacity; recyclables | Ministry of Natural Resources, Rosnedra, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Rosstandart, Rosstat |
| 13 | Intersectoral production balance | Release and import → intermediate consumption, final demand, accumulation, stocks, exports | VTS; capacity utilization; chain breaks; productivity; domestic value added | Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Ministry of Agriculture, Rosstat, FAS, industry FOU |
| 14 | Transport and logistics balance | Network, park, terminals, capacity → flows, transit, downtime | Capacity reserve; delivery time and reliability; costs; bottlenecks | Ministry of Transport, Rosavtodor, Roszheldor, Rosaviatsia, Rosmorrechflot, Rosstat |
| 15 | Environmental balance and waste management balance | Emissions, discharges, waste, disturbed land → cleaning, disposal, restoration, residual load | Impact; Cleanup; Disposal; Harm management; Ecosystem restoration | Ministry of Natural Resources, Rosprirodnadzor, Roshydromet, Rosleskhoz, Rospotrebnadzor, Rosstat |
| 16 | Budget and tax balance | Revenues, transfers, borrowings → expenses, transfers, debt service | Sustainability of the budget; debt; performance; obligations; tax base; unfinished | Ministry of Finance, Federal Treasury, FTS, Rosstat; Accounts Chamber - external participant |
| 17 | Investment and financial balance | Savings, profit, budget, credit, bonds, capital → fixed / working capital, repayment, outflow | Investment/GDP(GRP); funding gap; cost of capital; delay; project readiness | Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Finance, Bank of Russia, VEB.RF, Rosstat, development institutions |
| 18 | External economic balance and balance of critical dependencies | Export/import, income, capital → calculations, liabilities, foreign position | Trade balance; current account; NOE; critical imports; concentration of markets | Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Ministry of Finance, FCS, Bank of Russia, Rosstat |
| 19 | Balancing strategic resilience and continuity of vital systems | Risks, critical objects, reserves, protective and duplicative capacities → incidents, damage, recovery | Availability of services; recovery time; reserves; continuity plans; GIS redundancy | Emergencies Ministry, Ministry of Emergency Situations, FSTEC, Roskomnadzor, profile FOUs and subjects |
Rosstat should be involved as a cross-cutting methodological participant in official statistics; departmental systems as sources of operational data. The Bank of Russia, the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, the Security Council of the Russian Federation and other bodies participate only with the relevant decision and within the competence.
5.1. Cross-Channel Demonstrations
| Chain | Verified Connectivity |
|---|---|
| Housing | Housing → materials → Personnel → Energy → Utilities → Transport → project financing |
| Food | Food → Land → water → energy → Storage → Logistics → retail prices |
| Critical Products | Raw materials → Technology → Personnel → investments → Release → import dependence → Exports |
| Biotic Community: Air | Sources → transfer → receptors → health → measures → confirmed load change |
6. Communication of 19 balance sheets with 21 commission of the State Council
Commissions are organizational directions, and balance sheets are analytical objects. One balance sheet is used by several commissions; one commission considers several balances. Therefore, the system can serve as an inter-commission language without changing the current structure of the State Council.
| Commission | Balances | Practical application |
|---|---|---|
| Public and municipal administration | 1, 3, 5, 8, 16, 19 | Inter-level coordination, decision quality and continuity |
| Investments | 8, 11–14, 16, 17 | Investment security and infrastructure constraints |
| Infrastructure for Life | 1–3, 8, 10, 11, 14–17 | Harmonization of housing, communal, social and transport infrastructure |
| Workforce | 1–4, 13, 17 | Forecast of need, training and territorial distribution of personnel |
| Culture and traditional spiritual and moral values | 1, 4–6, 8 | Cultural infrastructure, participation and social cohesion |
| International Cooperation and Export | 4, 7, 11–14, 17, 18 | Export potential and critical external dependencies |
| Young people and children | 1–6, 8 | Demography, education, health, income and infrastructure |
| A Long and Active Life | 1–5, 8, 10, 15 | Health, Environment, Human Resources and Accessibility of Services |
| Industry | 3, 4, 10–18 | Power, raw materials, energy, logistics, technology and capital |
| Northern Sea Route and Arctic | 1, 3, 8, 10–15, 17–19 | Spatial constraints, logistics, resources and sustainability |
| Agriculture | 1, 3, 7, 9–12, 14–18 | Food, land, water, energy, logistics and exports |
| Family | 1–5, 8, 16 | Income, housing, services and demographic sustainability |
| Technological leadership | 3, 4, 11–13, 17–19 | Critical technologies, implementation and independence |
| Tourism | 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14, 15, 17 | Infrastructure, personnel, environment and transport accessibility |
| Physical Culture and Sports | 1–6, 8, 17 | Facilities availability, health, personnel and funding |
| Environmental Well-being | 2, 7, 9–15, 17, 19 | Natural limitations, impacts, recovery and verification |
| Data Economy | 1–19 | Passporting, compatibility, quality, versioning and data security |
| Economics and finance | 5, 13, 16–18; Arch 1–19 | Summary of macroeconomic, budgetary and financial constraints |
| Energy | 8, 10–15, 17–19 | Reliability, power, equipment, investment and environmental effect |
| Effective and Competitive Economy | 3–5, 7, 11–18 | Productivity, competition, demand, investment and exports |
| Efficient transport system | 1, 3, 7, 8, 11–15, 17–19 | Capacity, availability, logistics and sustainability |
Proposed route. Primary study - the Commission in the direction of "Environmental well-being"; inter-commission participation - "Data Economy", "Technological Leadership", "Energy" and "Economics and Finance". Expansion of the composition - according to the results of the primary examination.
7. Inter-industry model and equilibrium index
7.1. Economic core
The economic contour uses the official tables of resources and use and the tables "cost-release" of Rosstat. For scenario analysis, they are complemented by satellite matrices of labor, raw materials, energy, water, transport, emissions, and financing.
Basic model. x = Ax + y; Hx ≤ L; Rx ≤ R̄; Ex ≤ Ē; Wx ≤ W̄; Tx ≤ T̄; Fx ≤ F̄.
Here x is the vector of the industry release; A is the direct cost matrix; y is the final demand. H, R, E, W, T, and F are the coefficients of labour, raw materials, energy, water, transport, and financing; the upper bound is the available volume or limit.
Practical meaning: the change of one state program is recalculated not only in terms of funding, but also in terms of the need for personnel, construction materials, energy, water, logistics, imports and subsequent budget burden. The model does not replace the official forecast, but checks the mutual consistency of its prerequisites.
7.2. Integrated Navigation Index
For each indicator, a target corridor and critical boundaries are set. Normalized deviation dᵢⱼ Takes importance from 0 to 1. Balance assessment: Bᵢ = 100 × (1 − Σ αᵢⱼdᵢⱼ), Where the weights αᵢⱼ is equal 1.
Index. IRE = 100 × [∏(Bᵢ/100)ʷⁱ]^(1−λ) × [min(Bᵢ/100)]^λ. Ratio λ It is considered a "node"; for the pilot can be accepted 0,25 followed by calibration.
IRE is not a rating of authorities and does not replace primary indicators. A violation of a normative or critical threshold is issued by a separate signal and cannot be compensated for by good values of other balances.
7.3. Data quality
The Cdata data quality index is calculated separately for completeness, timeliness, comparability, source confirmation and reproducibility. Publication of the composite index without Cdata is not allowed. All weights, exceptions and manual adjustments are versioned and have an author and basis.
7.4. Balance sheet to the decision
- Purpose, territory and affected balances;
- resource requirement, source of coverage and limiting balance;
- intersectoral effects of the first and second order;
- budget, investment and foreign economic contour;
- Impact on people and the environment;
- stress scenario, backup and modification Bᵢ/IRE;
- data quality, decision, deadline and benchmarks.
8. The two-stage pilot
8.1. Step A — 90-day expert-analytical approbation
The goal is to prove methodological applicability without capital expenditures and without creating a new large-scale information system. Open and provided in the prescribed manner data, 3–5 priority balances and one territorial case are used.
| Timeframe | Stage | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1–15 day | Preparation | Territory, problem, data, indicator owners, baseline, access mode |
| 16–45 day | Model Assembly | Data passports, cross-industry graph, deficits, reserves, digital prototype |
| 46–75 day | Scripts | Basic, Targeted and Stressful Scenarios; Scientific and Departmental Verification |
| 76–90 day | Decision | Final report, balance sheet note, passport ECO-PPA, decision on the next step |
Results of step A
- passports of selected balances and a catalog of data sources;
- cross-industry map of dependencies and at least three scenarios;
- 5–10 measurable imbalances with causes and response options;
- Draft passport ECO-PPA and preliminary technical specification;
- Conclusion: stop, modify or train 12-month pilot.
8.2. Stage B — 12-month territorial ECO-PPA-pilot
Stage B begins only after G1-G2: feasibility study, legal and technical expertise, site selection, customer identification and funding sources, information security requirements and procurement procedures.
| Timeframe | Stage | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Months 1–2 | Organization and survey | Passport, site, working group, baseline, TK, legal data regime |
| Months 3–4 | Methodology and design | 19 passports, register up to 260 indicators, feasibility studies, design solutions |
| Months 5–8 | Deployment | Monitoring, mini-generation, telemetry, data integration, testing |
| Months 9–10 | Scenarios and interventions | Basic, Targeted, Stressful Scenarios; 2–3 Managed Interventions |
| Months 11–12 | Verification | Independent evaluation, actual costs and effects, decision to complete or replicate |
8.3. Territory criteria
- combination of residential, natural, transport and production zones;
- presence of a background point and sensitive objects;
- the willingness of regional and municipal authorities to participate without prior obligation to finance;
- availability of laboratory and metrological partner;
- the ability to form a control zone and a seasonal 12-month cycle;
- confirmed conditions of technological connection and operation of mini-generation.
The previously proposed contour Syzran-Rameno-Smolkino can be considered only after checking the legal status of the territories, the official interest of the participants and the correctness of geographical names.
9. Preliminary financial framework
Limitation. The estimate of up to 260,0 million rubles is not a budget obligation, estimate or request for allocation of funds. It is subject to clarification based on the results of feasibility studies, survey and definition of the legal mechanism for procurement and financing.
| Contour | Landmark | What needs to be revealed |
|---|---|---|
| Ecological technological contour | up to 130,0 million rubles | R&D/design; equipment; installation; Software and data; metrology; testing; training; reserve |
| Distributed mini-generation | up to 130,0 million rubles | Design; equipment; connection; control and telemetry; commissioning; permissions; training; reserve |
| Total | up to 260,0 million rubles | Structure, VAT, CAPEX/OPEX and full cost of ownership are specified by the feasibility study |
9.1. Requirements for the feasibility study
- justification of the composition and number of objects;
- separation of R&D, design, equipment, CMR, software, testing and reserve;
- at least three commercial offers or other audited estimates;
- CAPEX, annual OPEX and full cost of ownership for at least three years;
- sources of financing and risk allocation;
- legal mechanism of purchase, connection, operation and transfer of the result;
- Evaluate single-supplier dependency and data portability.
9.2. Possible sources
Extra-budgetary investments, funds of participants, regional programs and other legitimate sources can be considered only after confirming the legal grounds and readiness of the parties. Federal co-financing is not anticipated.
10. KPI and evidentiary value
Each KPI must have a formula, unit of measure, baseline, target value, source, periodicity, and data owner. Savings, emissions and payback targets are set after the baseline is fixed and do not change retrospectively.
| Group | Indicator / criterion |
|---|---|
| Passports | 19/19 passports for 3th month of full pilot |
| Data Catalog | 100% mandatory indicators have a source, unit, frequency and revision rule |
| Without new reporting | At least 85% indicators are formed from existing data |
| Data quality | Cdata not lower than 0,85; discrepancies over 5% are explained by protocol |
| Scripts | Basic, Stressful and Targeted Scenarios for Each Demonstration Chain |
| Early warning | For 100% red zones, the cause, duration and at least two response options are determined |
| Support for solutions | At least 5 projects reviewed with balance sheet |
| Auditability | 100% calculations are reproducible; manual adjustments are justified and versioned |
| Financial discipline | Deviation of CAPEX from the approved limit - within the limits specified by the pilot's passport |
| Techniques | Availability of equipment, share of valid data, recovery time and incidents — on TK |
| Ecology | Change of specific pollutants/resource consumption relative to baseline and control zone |
| Energy | Available capacity, production, KIUM, network consumption and cost - according to the approved method |
| Final Solution | Independent report and choice: scale, refine or discontinue |
11. Data, security and compatibility
The architecture is built on the principle of minimum necessary access. Prior to integration, the data composition, owners, legal basis for processing, access mode, storage, logging, depersonalization and destruction requirements are determined. Personal data, restricted access information and critical infrastructure information are used only if there are legal grounds and appropriate protection measures.
11.1. Legal conditions
- taking into account the requirements of the legislation on information, personal data and security of critical information infrastructure - if applicable;
- Prohibition of the promise of direct integration with federal GIS before coordination with their operators;
- a separate threat model and component certification requirements - if required;
- separation of open, service and protected data sets;
- versioning of methods, sources, calculations and access rights;
- open formats and the ability to transfer data to reduce dependence on the supplier.
11.2. Conditions of the energy and environmental contour
- legal status of the object of generation, technological connection, accounting and mode of consumption / sale of energy;
- land, urban planning, environmental and industrial permits;
- equipment certification, metrological traceability, service and spare parts;
- control zone, seasonality, laboratory testing and causal relationship between intervention and effect.
12. Risk Register
| Risk | Control measure |
|---|---|
| Duplication of state systems | Function Inventory; Integration Instead of Substitution |
| Poor data quality | Passport sources, Cdata, fix uncertainty |
| Uncoordinated methods | Single dictionary, expert group, protocol of disagreements |
| Violation of access | Minimization of data, differentiation of rights, journaling |
| Cyber Risks | Threat model, backup, testing and recovery plan |
| Vendor lock-in | Open formats, lot separation, portability and data rights |
| Excess value | Feasibility studies, alternative proposals, phased funding |
| Conflict of interest | Separation of initiator, operator, supplier and verifier |
| Failure to achieve effect | Baseline, control area, stop/go gate and stop right |
| Substitution | Consultative status of methodology; decisions only by authorized bodies |
| Manipulation KPI | Pre-launch formulas and sources; ban on retrospective base changes |
| Reputational risk | State language, verifiable statements, absence of unconfirmed partnerships |
Mandatory reservation. Pilot implementation is carried out after obtaining the necessary approvals and permits, determining the legal grounds for data processing, sources of financing and customer, as well as conducting procurement procedures provided for by law. The presentation of the concept and its consideration do not entail budgetary obligations.
13. Road map 2026–2030
| Horizon | Stage | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 0–90 days | Examination and prototype | 3–5 balance sheets, one case, data card, scenarios, passport ECO-PPA, decision on full pilot |
| 4–12 months | Territorial Pilot | 19 passports, up to 260 indicators, monitoring, mini-generation, independent evaluation |
| 12–18 months | Verification and Typing | Model regulations, data model, exchange requirements, cost estimation |
| 18–36 months | Several regions | Comparable regional balances and interregional chains |
| Up to 2030 | Selective application | Assessment of large cross-industry projects and early warning of critical imbalances |
13.1. Matrix 19 × 13 × 3
Decomposition can be used for subsequent scaling 19 Contours × 13 pair balance × 3 Level of management = to 741 A certified cell. This is a calculation structure, not an independent symbolic indicator: the federal, regional and municipal levels use common identifiers, formulas, evidence and red limits, while maintaining their own powers and goals.
13.2. Stop-Scaling Conditions
- no reproducible result or the effect is not separated from external factors;
- the cost of ownership is not confirmed or exceeds the permissible limit;
- rights to data, code and equipment are not regulated;
- the model depends on one supplier without the possibility of transfer;
- Safety and metrology requirements are not met;
- Independent verification revealed a significant conflict of interest or unreliability of the data.
14. Draft decisions of the Commission
Status. Draft for discussion; final wording to be decided by the authorities.
- Take note of the presented concept of the system of strategic balances "EQUILIBRIUM - ECO-PPA".
- Recognize the appropriate conduct of interdepartmental, scientific, technical, legal and financial-economic examination of the concept.
- To consider the possibility of creating a working (expert) group for the preparation of a passport 90-day approbation under the profile commission; the composition and work plan to approve the chairman of the commission.
- To recommend interested federal executive bodies, subjects of the Russian Federation, Rosstat, the Russian Academy of Sciences and expert organizations to submit comments and proposals within the competence.
- According to the results of the examination, submit to the Secretary of the State Council of the Russian Federation a report on the feasibility of the pilot, site options, financing, data and legal mechanism.
- If the conclusion is positive, prepare a feasibility study and draft passport 12-month territorial pilot, without creating budgetary obligations until a separate decision.
14.1. Possible wording of further instructions of the President of the Russian Federation
They are used only when deciding to raise the issue to the appropriate level.
- The Government of the Russian Federation, together with the relevant commission of the State Council, should consider the possibility of implementing the pilot project and submit proposals containing the pilot’s passport, financial and economic justification, sources of financing, assessment of legal and technological risks and the procedure for independent evaluation of the results.
- To the profile commission of the State Council to summarize the results of the pilot and submit to the Secretary of the State Council proposals on the advisability of submitting the issue to the Presidium of the State Council and preparing a report to the President of the Russian Federation.
14.2. Final request of the initiator
| № | Request | Expected result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conduct a working presentation | Feedback from the Secretariat and relevant commissions |
| 2 | Determine the profile commission and working group | Official route of examination |
| 3 | Consider 90-day approbation | Prototype tested and decision on full pilot |
ANNEXES
Annex 1. Project passport ECO-PPA
| Section | What is fixed |
|---|---|
| 1. Problem and Territory | What happens, where and who is affected |
| 2. Baseline | Reference period, control area, sources and data quality |
| 3. Objective | Measurable result, time and allowable corridor |
| 4. Balances | Affected balances, resource constraints and cross-industry effects |
| 5. Parties | Customer, operator, suppliers, data owners, verifier |
| 6. Legal model | Contracts, procurement, permits, data, intellectual rights |
| 7. Resources | CAPEX, OPEX, personnel, data, capacity, infrastructure |
| 8. Works | Composition, stages, control points, acceptance |
| 9. KPI | Formula, unit, baseline, target, source, period, owner |
| 10. Evidence | Protocols, telemetry, laboratory, photos/acts, versions of calculations |
| 11. Risks | Register, owner of risk, measure and residual risk |
| 12. Stop-criteria | When the project is suspended, changed or terminated |
| 13. Conclusion | Transfer, operation, dismantling, data archive, replication |
Annex 2. Balance sheet template
- Purpose and Territory.
- List of affected balances.
- Need, source of coverage and mobilized reserve.
- Limiting balance and expected date of deficit.
- Inter-industry effects of the first and second order.
- Budgetary, investment and foreign economic contours.
- Impact on population, health and the environment.
- Basic, Targeted and Stressful Scenarios.
- Change Bᵢ/IRE and data quality Cdata.
- Proposed solution, responsibility, timeline and benchmarks.
Annex 3. Minimum set before the full pilot starts
- letter of interest of the pilot subject without financial obligations;
- clarified passport of the territory and objects;
- Feasibility study and estimate with CAPEX/OPEX and full cost of ownership;
- legal opinion on data, procurement, land, energy and permits;
- Technical specification and threat model;
- list of equipment, certificates and metrology requirements;
- baseline, control area and measurement plan;
- Draft passport ECO-PPA and participants’ agreements;
- plan for independent verification and management of conflicts of interest;
- gate solution G0-G2.
Annex 4. Normative and methodological sources
1. Federal law of 08.12.2020 № 394-FZ "The State Council of the Russian Federation". Official source
2. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 21.12.2020 of 800 “Questions of the State Council of the Russian Federation”. Official source
3. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 613 of 22.07.2024 on State Council commissions. Official source
4. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 1003 of 29.12.2025 on the model provision on the commission of the State Council. Official source
5. Appointment A. Mr. Dumina Secretary of the State Council of the Russian Federation, 29.05.2024. Official source
6. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 07.05.2024 № 309 on national goals. Official source
7. Federal law of 28.06.2014 № 172-FZ "On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation". Official source
8. Rosstat: national accounts and input-output tables. Official source
9. Bank of Russia: methodology of balance of payments. Official source
Annex 5. Terms and restrictions
| Term | Working definition |
|---|---|
| EQUILIBRIUM | Author’s concept of information and analytical support of decisions; not the state system and not the authority |
| IAC | Proposed information and analytical outline; status, operator and access to data are determined separately |
| ECO-PPA | Pilot training design and contract framework; specific legal design is defined for each application |
| SPECZASHCHITA | Possible cooperation platform of execution; no exclusive rights and power functions |
| ESG-IR | Draft voluntary evidence-based and impact assessment methodology; does not replace government control, audit and standardization |
| SFERA | Communication environment; does not replace official channels |
| GASMP | Proposed monitoring-prognostic contour; connection to state data requires separate bases |
| 19 balances | Project analytical classifier; not an official list of statistical reports |
| IRE | Navigational index of imbalance; not rating of authorities and not replacement of primary indicators |
Conclusion
Main Package Formula. EQUILIBRIUM It shows where the imbalance is; ECO-PPA Secures the project to eliminate it; SPECZASHCHITA Can provide cooperative execution; ESG-IR independently confirms the result.
It is proposed to start with a small, reversible and verifiable step: working presentation and 90-day approbation. Only confirmed data, legal readiness, feasibility study and independent evaluation can become the basis for 12-month territorial pilot and subsequent consideration of the issue of scaling.
Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich
Initiator of the project "EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA"
Contact details: ______________________________
Date and signature: _________________________________
Source materials
Originals and versions of the document
- Paket_Dyuminu_Gossovet_Balansy_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.docxDOCX · main document
- Prezentatsiya_Dyuminu_Gossovet_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.pptxPPTX · related version
Other editions in web format
Each version is disclosed separately; the sequence of the source document is saved.
STRATEGIC BALANCE SYSTEM OF RUSSIAPrezentatsiya_Dyuminu_Gossovet_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.pptx · web text+
90 days
interconnected balances
12 months
two-stage pilot
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
ECO-PPA - author's design and contract framework, not standard energy PPA and not a new type of contract.
Inter-commission mechanism for coordinating goals, resources, territories and confirmed results.
up to 260 million rubles
Only after a decision and a specific
Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich • Moscow • 27 August 2026
Proactive proposal. It is not an official position or decision of the authorities; it does not create budgetary obligations.
Consider 90-day approbation
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
Now it is not the approval of the program and not the allocation of funds, but limited expert study.
Working presentation
Briefly present the state task, method 19 Balance Sheets and Outline ECO‑PPA.
Profile Commission
Determine the route through the Commission "Environmental Well-being" and the format of the inter-commission group.
90-day testing
Verify applicability on existing data without new federal GIS and capital investments; organizational resources are determined separately.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
Solutions face overall deficits
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
One program depends simultaneously on seven contours: personnel, energy, water, materials, transport, data, and finance.
Different temporal, territorial and methodological data slices
Goals are not always checked for resources and capacity
An industry result may look positive as long as the second-order consequences remain outside the decision field.
Costs, physical result and social effect are in different contours
Scaling can begin before independent validation of the effect
Management gap: There is no common language for assessing the cumulative effect.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
19 balance sheets create a common language
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
For each solution, five values are compared.
Need
Resource
Limitation
Reserve
Result
The balance sheet shows
what balance becomes a “bottleneck” and when there is a deficit;
which related industries and territories affect the chosen scenario;
what reserve and legal mechanism of coverage exist;
how the primary indicators, data quality and the composite index IRE change.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
ECO-PPA converts script to project
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
ECO-PPA - author's design and contract framework: not standard energy PPA, not a new type of contract and not a budget mechanism.
Scenario
Passport ECO-PPA
Implementation
Verification
Decision
EQUILIBRIUM detects restriction
Resources, parties, KPI, stop conditions
Selection of participants in the prescribed manner
Baseline, actual costs and effect
Zoom, Change or Stop
Legal design, customer, sources of funds, procurement and permits are determined separately for each project.
The pilot does not create an obligation to replicate.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
Architecture shares solution and verification
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
Separation of functions is mandatory; ESG-IR is a draft voluntary methodology, not an official standard.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
Powers are retained, roles are separated
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
Participant
Function
Limitation
Coordination, recommendations, generalization of practice
No control over the pilot's funds
State Council / Commission
Official data and decisions within the competence
Do not transfer authority to the model
Government, FOV, RF subject
Data Passports, Scenarios and Balance Sheets
Does not make power decisions
EQUILIBRIUM / IAC
Resources, liabilities, KPI and stop criteria
The legal model is determined by the project
ECO‑PPA
Implementation and independent confirmation of the result
Functions and conflicts of interest are divided
Performer / Verifier
No private participant is granted exclusive status.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
19 balance sheets cover the entire chain
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
Man and Society
Resources and environment
Production
Finance and sustainability
1. Demography
7. Food
13. Cross-industry release
16. Budget and taxes
2. Health and capacity
8. Housing and infrastructure
14. Transport and logistics
17. Investment and finance
3. Work and competences
9. Land and soil
15. Ecology and waste
18. External dependencies
4. Education, science, technology
10. Water
19. Strategic sustainability
5. Income and support
11. Fuel and energy
6. Culture and Demand
12. Raw materials and materials
19 balance sheets is a project analytical classifier, not a new list of state reporting.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
Route through the profile commission
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
Inter-commission participation
PRIMARY MARCHRUT
Data Economy — Certification, Compatibility and Data Quality
"Environmental
well-being"
Technology Leadership - Critical Technologies and Implementation
Natural Restriction, Impact, Recovery and Independent Verification
Energy — power, connection and mini-generation
Economics and finance — feasibility studies, cost of ownership and sources of funds
The proposed route, the final decision is for the Secretariat of the State Council.
Balances - analytical objects; commissions - organizational directions.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
90 days
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
The pilot consists of two stages.
Each stage has its own result and a separate decision to continue.
STEP A
STEP B
12 months
Expert - analytical approbation
Territorial ECO-PPA-pilot
3–5 Balance Sheets • One territorial case • current data • without capital investments
Organizational and expert resources - separately
After feasibility study, expertise, site, customer, sources of funds, permits and procurement procedures
Transition is possible only after positive gate-review.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
The first 90 days - without capital investments
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
The goal is to test methodological applicability on a limited set of data. Organizational and expert resources are determined separately.
1–15 day
16–45 day
46–75 day
76–90 day
Preparation
Model Assembly
Scripts
Decision
Territory, Problem, Indicator Owners, Baseline and Data Mode
Data Passports, Dependency Map, Deficits and Digital Prototype
Basic, Targeted and Stressful Options; Scientific and Departmental Verification
Final report, balance sheet note, passport ECO-PPA and go/nogo
The result: stop, modify or prepare a full pilot.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
12 months - field cycle after admission
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
The field phase covers seasonality, technical deployment and independent assessment of the actual effect.
Organization
Site, survey, baseline, TK, data mode
MONTH 1–2
Design
19 passports, feasibility studies, estimates, legal and technical solutions
MONTH 3–4
Deployment
Monitoring, eco-modules, mini-generation, telemetry, testing
MONTH 5–8
Scripts
2–3 Managed interventions and control measurements
MONTH 9–10
Verification
Actual costs, effect, decision to complete or replicate
MONTH 11–12
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
130
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
260 million rubles — preliminary ceiling
The assessment is intended for the framework of the feasibility study. It is not an estimate, a budgetary obligation or a request for funds.
Equal division 130/130 is a project hypothesis before the feasibility study; prices, sources and cost composition are not determined.
Teo should reveal.
130
R & D, design and SMR
equipment, software and tests
million rubles.
million rubles.
CAPEX, OPEX and reserve
Ecological technological contour
Distributed mini-generation
cost of ownership ≥ 3 years
Sources of funds and risks
Total: up to 260 million rubles; VAT, CAPEX/OPEX, prices, sources and legal model are specified in the feasibility study.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
KPI Link costs and effects
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
In 90-day approbation, it is proposed to check the project thresholds: formula, unit, baseline, target, source, periodicity and data owner.
Data
100% mandatory indicators have a source and owner; at least 85% are formed from current data
Quality
Cdata ≥ 0,85; Differences from Above 5% explained by the protocol; manual adjustments are versioned
Result
Baseline, control area, actual costs and measurable environmental/energy effect
Decision
Independent report and clear choice: scale, refine or discontinue
A critical threshold cannot be compensated for by a good average.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
Six gates protect against mistakes
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
The next stage begins only after a positive gate-review.
Issue addressed
Expertise
Readiness
Works
Evaluation
Decision
Territory, baseline, participants, success criteria
Legal, scientific, technical and financial opinions
Site, customer, funds, purchase, permissions and data
Work completed; equipment accepted; measurements valid
Effect confirmed regarding baseline and control
Zoom, change, repeat measurements or stop
A negative review means stopping or returning for revision - not an automatic transition.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
Scaling is possible after checking
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
The project trajectory leads from a limited case to model passports and comparable regional balances - only after individual decisions.
0–90 days
4–12 months
12–36 months
Up to 2030
Prototype
Field Pilot
Typization
Selective application
3–5 balances, one case, data card, scenarios, passport ECO‑PPA
19 passports, up to 260 indicators, monitoring, mini-generation, verification
Regulation, data model, assessment of the cost and portability of the solution
Comparable regional balances and early warning of critical imbalances
19 × 13 × 3 = to 741 certified cell — methodical decomposition, not an independent indicator of success.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
Stop conditions are built in before launch
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
Protection against an inefficient project should work before scaling and before irreversible costs arise.
RISK
MANAGEMENT MEASURES
Duplication of systems
Function Inventory; Integration Instead of Substitution
Poor data quality
Passport sources, Cdata, fix uncertainty
Vendor lock‑in
Open formats, lot separation, portability and data rights
Conflict of interest
Separation of initiator, executor, supplier and verifier
Failure to achieve effect
Baseline, control area, stop/go gate and stop right
STOP: Effect is not replicated; cost, rights, security or permissions are not confirmed.
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
Three solutions to start the examination
FOR PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
Conduct a working presentation
Present a state task, 19 Balance Sheets, ECO‑PPA and the frame of a two-stage pilot.
Determine the route of examination
Profile commission and inter-commission expert group - by decision of the State Council Secretariat.
Consider 90-day approbation
On current data, without a new federal GIS, capital investment and a full pilot's commitment.
The result: to stop, to finalize or with a positive result to prepare the feasibility study and the passport of 12-month pilot.
Not requested: state program • financing 260 million • Private operator • mandatory reproduction
EQUILIBRIUM — ECO‑PPA
Sources indicated in the presentation 29
- Internal project source: Paket_Dyuminu_Gossovet_Balansy_EQUILIBRIUM_ECO_PPA.docx, 27.08.2026
- https://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/74135
- [Presenter note]
- Open with the fact that it is a package for determining the route of examination, and not a request for approval of funding.
- https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/46186
- https://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/46219
- Note: A further 12-month pilot is considered only after a positive conclusion.
- Do not criticize existing systems: the problem is comparability and cross-sectoral coordination, not lack of data.
- https://rosstat.gov.ru/statistics/accounts
- https://www.cbr.ru/statistics/macro_itm/external_sector/pb/meth_com_bop/
- IRE is used only as a navigation index; regulatory thresholds and primary indicators take precedence.
- Not to call ECO-PPA an approved state contract. This is a working framework for the preparation of a specific project.
- The scheme is a functional pilot architecture; specific organizations and legal statuses are determined by individual decisions.
- The role chart describes the proposed distinction, rather than assigning a specific operator or performer.
- The composition of the balance sheets is subject to expert clarification; the main thing is the cross-cutting coherence of resources and results.
- https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202407220045
- https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202512290122
- Do not approve the composition of the inter-commission group on the slide: this is a proposal for primary study.
- Do not mix the results of the stages: analytical approbation does not mean readiness for a capital pilot.
- The time frame is counted after the organizational decision and the provision of an agreed set of baseline data.
- To show that the 12-month cycle begins only after G1-G2 and a separate decision on the legal and financial model.
- Financial framework is the proposal of the initiator. No obligations before the feasibility study, expertise and a separate decision.
- Target values for object KPI are set after fixing the reference level and do not change retrospectively.
- The gate is a project method. Specific decisions are made by authorized bodies and the customer in the prescribed manner.
- https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201406300016
- https://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202405070015
- Scaling is possible only after independent evaluation, typing and a separate solution.
- The risk register must have owners, measures, residual risk and a stop trigger.
- Close the report with three specific requests and immediately remove four possible concerns.



