Brief annotation
About the document
A register of systemic fields and connections used in the SOYUZ741 architecture.
Presentation
Реестр_741_Полей_СОЮЗ-741.pptx
Page — from —
Width
Downloading the document...
Version 1.0 · 25 August 2026
Registry architecture
741 = 13 Field Families × 19 Base Nodes × 3 Status.
Condition: D - Diagnostics; K - Coordination; R is development.
Module code: Sxx-Nxx-D/K/R. Example: S05-N06-D - diagnostics of knowledge in the family "Information and data".
Each module passport contains: code, function, metrics, data, formula, links and validation criteria.
The registry is an author's system model. Index formulas are project operating models and require calibration on empirical data for each application circuit.
Legend of formulas
D: D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T. C - completeness of coverage; Q - quality/reliability; T - relevance of data.
K: K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R. A is consistency; L - Connectivity; R - availability of resources.
R: R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V. G - increase in result; S - stability; V - reproducibility/scalability.
S01 · Unity and Management
Family function: integrity, subjectivity, and coherent management. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S01-N01-D | Diagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N01-K, S01-N01-R, S01-N02-D, S13-N01-D, S02-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N01-K | Coordination of the "Subject" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N01-D, S01-N01-R, S01-N02-K, S13-N01-K, S02-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N01-R | Development of the "Subject" node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N01-D, S01-N01-K, S01-N02-R, S13-N01-R, S02-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N02-D | Diagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N02-K, S01-N02-R, S01-N01-D, S01-N03-D, S13-N02-D, S02-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N02-K | Coordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N02-D, S01-N02-R, S01-N01-K, S01-N03-K, S13-N02-K, S02-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N02-R | Development of the “Purpose” node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N02-D, S01-N02-K, S01-N01-R, S01-N03-R, S13-N02-R, S02-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N03-K, S01-N03-R, S01-N02-D, S01-N04-D, S13-N03-D, S02-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N03-D, S01-N03-R, S01-N02-K, S01-N04-K, S13-N03-K, S02-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N03-D, S01-N03-K, S01-N02-R, S01-N04-R, S13-N03-R, S02-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N04-K, S01-N04-R, S01-N03-D, S01-N05-D, S13-N04-D, S02-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N04-D, S01-N04-R, S01-N03-K, S01-N05-K, S13-N04-K, S02-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N04-D, S01-N04-K, S01-N03-R, S01-N05-R, S13-N04-R, S02-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N05-K, S01-N05-R, S01-N04-D, S01-N06-D, S13-N05-D, S02-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N05-K | Coordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the management field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N05-D, S01-N05-R, S01-N04-K, S01-N06-K, S13-N05-K, S02-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N05-D, S01-N05-K, S01-N04-R, S01-N06-R, S13-N05-R, S02-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N06-D | Diagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N06-K, S01-N06-R, S01-N05-D, S01-N07-D, S13-N06-D, S02-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N06-K | Coordination of the Knowledge node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N06-D, S01-N06-R, S01-N05-K, S01-N07-K, S13-N06-K, S02-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N06-D, S01-N06-K, S01-N05-R, S01-N07-R, S13-N06-R, S02-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N07-D | Diagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N07-K, S01-N07-R, S01-N06-D, S01-N08-D, S13-N07-D, S02-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N07-K | Coordination of the "Solution" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N07-D, S01-N07-R, S01-N06-K, S01-N08-K, S13-N07-K, S02-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N07-R | Development of the "Solution" node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N07-D, S01-N07-K, S01-N06-R, S01-N08-R, S13-N07-R, S02-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N08-D | Diagnostics of the Action node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N08-K, S01-N08-R, S01-N07-D, S01-N09-D, S13-N08-D, S02-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N08-K | Coordination of the node "Action" in the contour of the management field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N08-D, S01-N08-R, S01-N07-K, S01-N09-K, S13-N08-K, S02-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N08-D, S01-N08-K, S01-N07-R, S01-N09-R, S13-N08-R, S02-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N09-D | Diagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N09-K, S01-N09-R, S01-N08-D, S01-N10-D, S13-N09-D, S02-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N09-D, S01-N09-R, S01-N08-K, S01-N10-K, S13-N09-K, S02-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N09-D, S01-N09-K, S01-N08-R, S01-N10-R, S13-N09-R, S02-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N10-D | Diagnostics of the Risk node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N10-K, S01-N10-R, S01-N09-D, S01-N11-D, S13-N10-D, S02-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N10-K | Coordination of the Risk node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N10-D, S01-N10-R, S01-N09-K, S01-N11-K, S13-N10-K, S02-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N10-D, S01-N10-K, S01-N09-R, S01-N11-R, S13-N10-R, S02-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N11-K, S01-N11-R, S01-N10-D, S01-N12-D, S13-N11-D, S02-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N11-K | Coordination of the “Trust” node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N11-D, S01-N11-R, S01-N10-K, S01-N12-K, S13-N11-K, S02-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N11-R | Development of the trust node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N11-D, S01-N11-K, S01-N10-R, S01-N12-R, S13-N11-R, S02-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N12-D | Diagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N12-K, S01-N12-R, S01-N11-D, S01-N13-D, S13-N12-D, S02-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N12-K | Coordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N12-D, S01-N12-R, S01-N11-K, S01-N13-K, S13-N12-K, S02-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N12-D, S01-N12-K, S01-N11-R, S01-N13-R, S13-N12-R, S02-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N13-D | Diagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N13-K, S01-N13-R, S01-N12-D, S01-N14-D, S13-N13-D, S02-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N13-K | Coordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N13-D, S01-N13-R, S01-N12-K, S01-N14-K, S13-N13-K, S02-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N13-R | Development of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N13-D, S01-N13-K, S01-N12-R, S01-N14-R, S13-N13-R, S02-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N14-D | Diagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N14-K, S01-N14-R, S01-N13-D, S01-N15-D, S13-N14-D, S02-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N14-K | Coordination of the “Standard” node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N14-D, S01-N14-R, S01-N13-K, S01-N15-K, S13-N14-K, S02-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N14-R | Development of the Standard node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N14-D, S01-N14-K, S01-N13-R, S01-N15-R, S13-N14-R, S02-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N15-D | Diagnostics of the "Finance" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N15-K, S01-N15-R, S01-N14-D, S01-N16-D, S13-N15-D, S02-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N15-D, S01-N15-R, S01-N14-K, S01-N16-K, S13-N15-K, S02-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N15-R | Development of the "Finance" node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N15-D, S01-N15-K, S01-N14-R, S01-N16-R, S13-N15-R, S02-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N16-D | Diagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N16-K, S01-N16-R, S01-N15-D, S01-N17-D, S13-N16-D, S02-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N16-D, S01-N16-R, S01-N15-K, S01-N17-K, S13-N16-K, S02-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N16-R | Development of the Personnel node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N16-D, S01-N16-K, S01-N15-R, S01-N17-R, S13-N16-R, S02-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N17-D | Diagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N17-K, S01-N17-R, S01-N16-D, S01-N18-D, S13-N17-D, S02-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N17-K | Coordination of the "Technology" node in the contour of the management field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N17-D, S01-N17-R, S01-N16-K, S01-N18-K, S13-N17-K, S02-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N17-D, S01-N17-K, S01-N16-R, S01-N18-R, S13-N17-R, S02-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N18-D | Diagnosis of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the management field: measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N18-K, S01-N18-R, S01-N17-D, S01-N19-D, S13-N18-D, S02-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N18-K | Coordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of the management field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N18-D, S01-N18-R, S01-N17-K, S01-N19-K, S13-N18-K, S02-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N18-R | Development of the “Environment” node in the contour of the management field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N18-D, S01-N18-K, S01-N17-R, S01-N19-R, S13-N18-R, S02-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S01-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the management field: to measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S01-N19-K, S01-N19-R, S01-N18-D, S13-N19-D, S02-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S01-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the management field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S01-N19-D, S01-N19-R, S01-N18-K, S13-N19-K, S02-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S01-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the management field: to change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S01-N19-D, S01-N19-K, S01-N18-R, S13-N19-R, S02-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S02 · Meaning and Values
The function of the family: purpose, values, identity and social meaning. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S02-N01-D | Diagnosis of the "Subject" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N01-K, S02-N01-R, S02-N02-D, S01-N01-D, S03-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N01-K | Coordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N01-D, S02-N01-R, S02-N02-K, S01-N01-K, S03-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N01-R | Development of the node "Subject" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N01-D, S02-N01-K, S02-N02-R, S01-N01-R, S03-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N02-D | Diagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N02-K, S02-N02-R, S02-N01-D, S02-N03-D, S01-N02-D, S03-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N02-K | Coordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N02-D, S02-N02-R, S02-N01-K, S02-N03-K, S01-N02-K, S03-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N02-R | Development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N02-D, S02-N02-K, S02-N01-R, S02-N03-R, S01-N02-R, S03-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N03-K, S02-N03-R, S02-N02-D, S02-N04-D, S01-N03-D, S03-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N03-D, S02-N03-R, S02-N02-K, S02-N04-K, S01-N03-K, S03-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N03-D, S02-N03-K, S02-N02-R, S02-N04-R, S01-N03-R, S03-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N04-K, S02-N04-R, S02-N03-D, S02-N05-D, S01-N04-D, S03-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N04-D, S02-N04-R, S02-N03-K, S02-N05-K, S01-N04-K, S03-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N04-D, S02-N04-K, S02-N03-R, S02-N05-R, S01-N04-R, S03-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N05-K, S02-N05-R, S02-N04-D, S02-N06-D, S01-N05-D, S03-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N05-K | Coordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N05-D, S02-N05-R, S02-N04-K, S02-N06-K, S01-N05-K, S03-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N05-D, S02-N05-K, S02-N04-R, S02-N06-R, S01-N05-R, S03-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N06-D | Diagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N06-K, S02-N06-R, S02-N05-D, S02-N07-D, S01-N06-D, S03-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N06-K | Coordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N06-D, S02-N06-R, S02-N05-K, S02-N07-K, S01-N06-K, S03-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N06-R | Development of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N06-D, S02-N06-K, S02-N05-R, S02-N07-R, S01-N06-R, S03-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N07-D | Diagnostics of the node "Solution" in the contour of the semantic field: to measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N07-K, S02-N07-R, S02-N06-D, S02-N08-D, S01-N07-D, S03-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N07-K | Coordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N07-D, S02-N07-R, S02-N06-K, S02-N08-K, S01-N07-K, S03-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N07-R | Development of the node "Solution" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N07-D, S02-N07-K, S02-N06-R, S02-N08-R, S01-N07-R, S03-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N08-D | Diagnostics of the "Action" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N08-K, S02-N08-R, S02-N07-D, S02-N09-D, S01-N08-D, S03-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N08-K | Coordination of the node "Action" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N08-D, S02-N08-R, S02-N07-K, S02-N09-K, S01-N08-K, S03-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N08-R | Development of the node "Action" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N08-D, S02-N08-K, S02-N07-R, S02-N09-R, S01-N08-R, S03-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N09-D | Diagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N09-K, S02-N09-R, S02-N08-D, S02-N10-D, S01-N09-D, S03-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N09-D, S02-N09-R, S02-N08-K, S02-N10-K, S01-N09-K, S03-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N09-D, S02-N09-K, S02-N08-R, S02-N10-R, S01-N09-R, S03-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N10-D | Diagnosis of the "Risk" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N10-K, S02-N10-R, S02-N09-D, S02-N11-D, S01-N10-D, S03-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N10-K | Coordination of the node "Risk" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N10-D, S02-N10-R, S02-N09-K, S02-N11-K, S01-N10-K, S03-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N10-D, S02-N10-K, S02-N09-R, S02-N11-R, S01-N10-R, S03-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N11-K, S02-N11-R, S02-N10-D, S02-N12-D, S01-N11-D, S03-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N11-K | Coordination of the "Trust" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N11-D, S02-N11-R, S02-N10-K, S02-N12-K, S01-N11-K, S03-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N11-R | The development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N11-D, S02-N11-K, S02-N10-R, S02-N12-R, S01-N11-R, S03-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N12-D | Diagnosis of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N12-K, S02-N12-R, S02-N11-D, S02-N13-D, S01-N12-D, S03-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N12-K | Coordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N12-D, S02-N12-R, S02-N11-K, S02-N13-K, S01-N12-K, S03-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N12-D, S02-N12-K, S02-N11-R, S02-N13-R, S01-N12-R, S03-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N13-D | Diagnostics of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the semantic field: to measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N13-K, S02-N13-R, S02-N12-D, S02-N14-D, S01-N13-D, S03-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N13-K | Coordination of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N13-D, S02-N13-R, S02-N12-K, S02-N14-K, S01-N13-K, S03-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N13-R | Development of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N13-D, S02-N13-K, S02-N12-R, S02-N14-R, S01-N13-R, S03-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N14-D | Diagnostics of the node "Standard" in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N14-K, S02-N14-R, S02-N13-D, S02-N15-D, S01-N14-D, S03-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N14-K | Coordination of the node "Standard" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N14-D, S02-N14-R, S02-N13-K, S02-N15-K, S01-N14-K, S03-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N14-R | Development of the node "Standard" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N14-D, S02-N14-K, S02-N13-R, S02-N15-R, S01-N14-R, S03-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N15-D | Diagnosis of the "Finance" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N15-K, S02-N15-R, S02-N14-D, S02-N16-D, S01-N15-D, S03-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N15-D, S02-N15-R, S02-N14-K, S02-N16-K, S01-N15-K, S03-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N15-R | Development of the "Finance" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N15-D, S02-N15-K, S02-N14-R, S02-N16-R, S01-N15-R, S03-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N16-D | Diagnosis of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N16-K, S02-N16-R, S02-N15-D, S02-N17-D, S01-N16-D, S03-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the semantic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N16-D, S02-N16-R, S02-N15-K, S02-N17-K, S01-N16-K, S03-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N16-R | Development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N16-D, S02-N16-K, S02-N15-R, S02-N17-R, S01-N16-R, S03-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N17-D | Diagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of the semantic field: to measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N17-K, S02-N17-R, S02-N16-D, S02-N18-D, S01-N17-D, S03-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N17-K | Coordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N17-D, S02-N17-R, S02-N16-K, S02-N18-K, S01-N17-K, S03-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N17-D, S02-N17-K, S02-N16-R, S02-N18-R, S01-N17-R, S03-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N18-D | Diagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the semantic field: to measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N18-K, S02-N18-R, S02-N17-D, S02-N19-D, S01-N18-D, S03-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N18-K | Coordination of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N18-D, S02-N18-R, S02-N17-K, S02-N19-K, S01-N18-K, S03-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N18-R | Development of the node "Environment" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N18-D, S02-N18-K, S02-N17-R, S02-N19-R, S01-N18-R, S03-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S02-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the semantic field: measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S02-N19-K, S02-N19-R, S02-N18-D, S01-N19-D, S03-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S02-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the semantic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S02-N19-D, S02-N19-R, S02-N18-K, S01-N19-K, S03-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S02-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the semantic field: change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S02-N19-D, S02-N19-K, S02-N18-R, S01-N19-R, S03-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S03 · Time and Cycles
Family Function: Rhythms, Stages, Timing, Scenarios and Development Cycles. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S03-N01-D | Diagnosis of the "Subject" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N01-K, S03-N01-R, S03-N02-D, S02-N01-D, S04-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N01-K | Coordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the time field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N01-D, S03-N01-R, S03-N02-K, S02-N01-K, S04-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N01-R | Development of the subject node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N01-D, S03-N01-K, S03-N02-R, S02-N01-R, S04-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N02-D | Diagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N02-K, S03-N02-R, S03-N01-D, S03-N03-D, S02-N02-D, S04-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N02-K | Coordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N02-D, S03-N02-R, S03-N01-K, S03-N03-K, S02-N02-K, S04-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N02-R | Development of the "Target" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N02-D, S03-N02-K, S03-N01-R, S03-N03-R, S02-N02-R, S04-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N03-K, S03-N03-R, S03-N02-D, S03-N04-D, S02-N03-D, S04-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N03-D, S03-N03-R, S03-N02-K, S03-N04-K, S02-N03-K, S04-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N03-D, S03-N03-K, S03-N02-R, S03-N04-R, S02-N03-R, S04-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N04-D | Diagnosis of the Resource node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N04-K, S03-N04-R, S03-N03-D, S03-N05-D, S02-N04-D, S04-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N04-D, S03-N04-R, S03-N03-K, S03-N05-K, S02-N04-K, S04-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N04-D, S03-N04-K, S03-N03-R, S03-N05-R, S02-N04-R, S04-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N05-K, S03-N05-R, S03-N04-D, S03-N06-D, S02-N05-D, S04-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N05-K | Coordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the time field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N05-D, S03-N05-R, S03-N04-K, S03-N06-K, S02-N05-K, S04-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the time field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N05-D, S03-N05-K, S03-N04-R, S03-N06-R, S02-N05-R, S04-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N06-D | Diagnosis of the Knowledge node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N06-K, S03-N06-R, S03-N05-D, S03-N07-D, S02-N06-D, S04-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N06-K | Coordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N06-D, S03-N06-R, S03-N05-K, S03-N07-K, S02-N06-K, S04-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the time field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N06-D, S03-N06-K, S03-N05-R, S03-N07-R, S02-N06-R, S04-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N07-D | Diagnosis of the "Solution" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N07-K, S03-N07-R, S03-N06-D, S03-N08-D, S02-N07-D, S04-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N07-K | Coordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the time field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N07-D, S03-N07-R, S03-N06-K, S03-N08-K, S02-N07-K, S04-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N07-R | Development of the "Solution" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N07-D, S03-N07-K, S03-N06-R, S03-N08-R, S02-N07-R, S04-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N08-D | Diagnostics of the Action node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N08-K, S03-N08-R, S03-N07-D, S03-N09-D, S02-N08-D, S04-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N08-K | Coordination of the "Action" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N08-D, S03-N08-R, S03-N07-K, S03-N09-K, S02-N08-K, S04-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the time field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N08-D, S03-N08-K, S03-N07-R, S03-N09-R, S02-N08-R, S04-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N09-D | Diagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N09-K, S03-N09-R, S03-N08-D, S03-N10-D, S02-N09-D, S04-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N09-D, S03-N09-R, S03-N08-K, S03-N10-K, S02-N09-K, S04-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the time field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N09-D, S03-N09-K, S03-N08-R, S03-N10-R, S02-N09-R, S04-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N10-D | Diagnosis of the Risk node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N10-K, S03-N10-R, S03-N09-D, S03-N11-D, S02-N10-D, S04-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N10-K | Coordination of the node "Risk" in the contour of the time field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N10-D, S03-N10-R, S03-N09-K, S03-N11-K, S02-N10-K, S04-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N10-D, S03-N10-K, S03-N09-R, S03-N11-R, S02-N10-R, S04-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N11-D | Diagnostics of the Trust node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N11-K, S03-N11-R, S03-N10-D, S03-N12-D, S02-N11-D, S04-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N11-K | Coordination of the "Trust" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N11-D, S03-N11-R, S03-N10-K, S03-N12-K, S02-N11-K, S04-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N11-R | Development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N11-D, S03-N11-K, S03-N10-R, S03-N12-R, S02-N11-R, S04-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N12-D | Diagnosis of the "Cooperation" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N12-K, S03-N12-R, S03-N11-D, S03-N13-D, S02-N12-D, S04-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N12-K | Coordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N12-D, S03-N12-R, S03-N11-K, S03-N13-K, S02-N12-K, S04-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N12-D, S03-N12-K, S03-N11-R, S03-N13-R, S02-N12-R, S04-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N13-D | Diagnostics of the Infrastructure node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N13-K, S03-N13-R, S03-N12-D, S03-N14-D, S02-N13-D, S04-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N13-K | Coordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N13-D, S03-N13-R, S03-N12-K, S03-N14-K, S02-N13-K, S04-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N13-R | Development of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N13-D, S03-N13-K, S03-N12-R, S03-N14-R, S02-N13-R, S04-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N14-D | Diagnostics of the Standard node in the time field contour: measure current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N14-K, S03-N14-R, S03-N13-D, S03-N15-D, S02-N14-D, S04-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N14-K | Coordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N14-D, S03-N14-R, S03-N13-K, S03-N15-K, S02-N14-K, S04-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N14-R | Development of the Standard node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N14-D, S03-N14-K, S03-N13-R, S03-N15-R, S02-N14-R, S04-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N15-D | Diagnostics of the "Finance" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N15-K, S03-N15-R, S03-N14-D, S03-N16-D, S02-N15-D, S04-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N15-D, S03-N15-R, S03-N14-K, S03-N16-K, S02-N15-K, S04-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N15-R | Development of the Finance node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N15-D, S03-N15-K, S03-N14-R, S03-N16-R, S02-N15-R, S04-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N16-D | Diagnosis of the "Personnel" node in the time field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N16-K, S03-N16-R, S03-N15-D, S03-N17-D, S02-N16-D, S04-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N16-D, S03-N16-R, S03-N15-K, S03-N17-K, S02-N16-K, S04-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N16-R | Development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N16-D, S03-N16-K, S03-N15-R, S03-N17-R, S02-N16-R, S04-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N17-D | Diagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of the time field: to measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N17-K, S03-N17-R, S03-N16-D, S03-N18-D, S02-N17-D, S04-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N17-K | Coordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the time field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N17-D, S03-N17-R, S03-N16-K, S03-N18-K, S02-N17-K, S04-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N17-D, S03-N17-K, S03-N16-R, S03-N18-R, S02-N17-R, S04-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N18-D | Diagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the time field: to measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N18-K, S03-N18-R, S03-N17-D, S03-N19-D, S02-N18-D, S04-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N18-K | Coordination of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the time field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N18-D, S03-N18-R, S03-N17-K, S03-N19-K, S02-N18-K, S04-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N18-R | Development of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N18-D, S03-N18-K, S03-N17-R, S03-N19-R, S02-N18-R, S04-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S03-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the time field: measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S03-N19-K, S03-N19-R, S03-N18-D, S02-N19-D, S04-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S03-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the time field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S03-N19-D, S03-N19-R, S03-N18-K, S02-N19-K, S04-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S03-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the time field: change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S03-N19-D, S03-N19-K, S03-N18-R, S02-N19-R, S04-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S04 · Energy and resources
Function of the family: resource security, energy and material flows. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S04-N01-D | Diagnostics of the "Subject" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N01-K, S04-N01-R, S04-N02-D, S03-N01-D, S05-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N01-K | Coordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N01-D, S04-N01-R, S04-N02-K, S03-N01-K, S05-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N01-R | Development of the subject node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N01-D, S04-N01-K, S04-N02-R, S03-N01-R, S05-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N02-D | Diagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N02-K, S04-N02-R, S04-N01-D, S04-N03-D, S03-N02-D, S05-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N02-K | Coordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N02-D, S04-N02-R, S04-N01-K, S04-N03-K, S03-N02-K, S05-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N02-R | Development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N02-D, S04-N02-K, S04-N01-R, S04-N03-R, S03-N02-R, S05-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N03-K, S04-N03-R, S04-N02-D, S04-N04-D, S03-N03-D, S05-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N03-D, S04-N03-R, S04-N02-K, S04-N04-K, S03-N03-K, S05-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N03-D, S04-N03-K, S04-N02-R, S04-N04-R, S03-N03-R, S05-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N04-K, S04-N04-R, S04-N03-D, S04-N05-D, S03-N04-D, S05-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N04-D, S04-N04-R, S04-N03-K, S04-N05-K, S03-N04-K, S05-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N04-D, S04-N04-K, S04-N03-R, S04-N05-R, S03-N04-R, S05-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N05-K, S04-N05-R, S04-N04-D, S04-N06-D, S03-N05-D, S05-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N05-K | Coordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N05-D, S04-N05-R, S04-N04-K, S04-N06-K, S03-N05-K, S05-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N05-D, S04-N05-K, S04-N04-R, S04-N06-R, S03-N05-R, S05-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N06-D | Diagnostics of the Knowledge node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N06-K, S04-N06-R, S04-N05-D, S04-N07-D, S03-N06-D, S05-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N06-K | Coordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N06-D, S04-N06-R, S04-N05-K, S04-N07-K, S03-N06-K, S05-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the resource field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N06-D, S04-N06-K, S04-N05-R, S04-N07-R, S03-N06-R, S05-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N07-D | Diagnostics of the node "Solution" in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N07-K, S04-N07-R, S04-N06-D, S04-N08-D, S03-N07-D, S05-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N07-K | Coordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N07-D, S04-N07-R, S04-N06-K, S04-N08-K, S03-N07-K, S05-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N07-R | Development of the "Solution" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N07-D, S04-N07-K, S04-N06-R, S04-N08-R, S03-N07-R, S05-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N08-D | Diagnostics of the Action node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N08-K, S04-N08-R, S04-N07-D, S04-N09-D, S03-N08-D, S05-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N08-K | Coordination of the node "Action" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N08-D, S04-N08-R, S04-N07-K, S04-N09-K, S03-N08-K, S05-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N08-D, S04-N08-K, S04-N07-R, S04-N09-R, S03-N08-R, S05-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N09-D | Diagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N09-K, S04-N09-R, S04-N08-D, S04-N10-D, S03-N09-D, S05-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N09-D, S04-N09-R, S04-N08-K, S04-N10-K, S03-N09-K, S05-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N09-R | Development of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N09-D, S04-N09-K, S04-N08-R, S04-N10-R, S03-N09-R, S05-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N10-D | Diagnostics of the Risk node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N10-K, S04-N10-R, S04-N09-D, S04-N11-D, S03-N10-D, S05-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N10-K | Coordination of the Risk node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N10-D, S04-N10-R, S04-N09-K, S04-N11-K, S03-N10-K, S05-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the resource field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N10-D, S04-N10-K, S04-N09-R, S04-N11-R, S03-N10-R, S05-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N11-K, S04-N11-R, S04-N10-D, S04-N12-D, S03-N11-D, S05-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N11-K | Coordination of the node "Trust" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N11-D, S04-N11-R, S04-N10-K, S04-N12-K, S03-N11-K, S05-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N11-R | Development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N11-D, S04-N11-K, S04-N10-R, S04-N12-R, S03-N11-R, S05-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N12-D | Diagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N12-K, S04-N12-R, S04-N11-D, S04-N13-D, S03-N12-D, S05-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N12-K | Coordination of the node "Cooperation" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N12-D, S04-N12-R, S04-N11-K, S04-N13-K, S03-N12-K, S05-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N12-D, S04-N12-K, S04-N11-R, S04-N13-R, S03-N12-R, S05-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N13-D | Diagnostics of the Infrastructure node in the resource field contour: measure current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N13-K, S04-N13-R, S04-N12-D, S04-N14-D, S03-N13-D, S05-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N13-K | Coordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N13-D, S04-N13-R, S04-N12-K, S04-N14-K, S03-N13-K, S05-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N13-R | Development of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N13-D, S04-N13-K, S04-N12-R, S04-N14-R, S03-N13-R, S05-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N14-D | Diagnostics of the "Standard" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N14-K, S04-N14-R, S04-N13-D, S04-N15-D, S03-N14-D, S05-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N14-K | Coordination of the node "Standard" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N14-D, S04-N14-R, S04-N13-K, S04-N15-K, S03-N14-K, S05-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N14-R | Development of the Standard node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N14-D, S04-N14-K, S04-N13-R, S04-N15-R, S03-N14-R, S05-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N15-D | Diagnostics of the "Finance" node in the resource field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N15-K, S04-N15-R, S04-N14-D, S04-N16-D, S03-N15-D, S05-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N15-D, S04-N15-R, S04-N14-K, S04-N16-K, S03-N15-K, S05-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N15-R | Development of the "Finance" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N15-D, S04-N15-K, S04-N14-R, S04-N16-R, S03-N15-R, S05-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N16-D | Diagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N16-K, S04-N16-R, S04-N15-D, S04-N17-D, S03-N16-D, S05-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the resource field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N16-D, S04-N16-R, S04-N15-K, S04-N17-K, S03-N16-K, S05-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N16-R | The development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N16-D, S04-N16-K, S04-N15-R, S04-N17-R, S03-N16-R, S05-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N17-D | Diagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N17-K, S04-N17-R, S04-N16-D, S04-N18-D, S03-N17-D, S05-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N17-K | Coordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N17-D, S04-N17-R, S04-N16-K, S04-N18-K, S03-N17-K, S05-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N17-D, S04-N17-K, S04-N16-R, S04-N18-R, S03-N17-R, S05-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N18-D | Diagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the resource field: to measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N18-K, S04-N18-R, S04-N17-D, S04-N19-D, S03-N18-D, S05-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N18-K | Coordination of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N18-D, S04-N18-R, S04-N17-K, S04-N19-K, S03-N18-K, S05-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N18-R | Development of the "Environment" node in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N18-D, S04-N18-K, S04-N17-R, S04-N19-R, S03-N18-R, S05-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S04-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the resource field: measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S04-N19-K, S04-N19-R, S04-N18-D, S03-N19-D, S05-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S04-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the resource field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S04-N19-D, S04-N19-R, S04-N18-K, S03-N19-K, S05-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S04-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the resource field: change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S04-N19-D, S04-N19-K, S04-N18-R, S03-N19-R, S05-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S05 · Information and data
Family function: data, knowledge, digital footprints and analytics. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S05-N01-D | Diagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the information field: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N01-K, S05-N01-R, S05-N02-D, S04-N01-D, S06-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N01-K | Coordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N01-D, S05-N01-R, S05-N02-K, S04-N01-K, S06-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N01-R | Development of the subject node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N01-D, S05-N01-K, S05-N02-R, S04-N01-R, S06-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N02-D | Diagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N02-K, S05-N02-R, S05-N01-D, S05-N03-D, S04-N02-D, S06-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N02-K | Coordination of the "Purpose" node in the information field contour: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N02-D, S05-N02-R, S05-N01-K, S05-N03-K, S04-N02-K, S06-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N02-R | Development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N02-D, S05-N02-K, S05-N01-R, S05-N03-R, S04-N02-R, S06-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N03-K, S05-N03-R, S05-N02-D, S05-N04-D, S04-N03-D, S06-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N03-D, S05-N03-R, S05-N02-K, S05-N04-K, S04-N03-K, S06-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N03-D, S05-N03-K, S05-N02-R, S05-N04-R, S04-N03-R, S06-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N04-K, S05-N04-R, S05-N03-D, S05-N05-D, S04-N04-D, S06-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N04-D, S05-N04-R, S05-N03-K, S05-N05-K, S04-N04-K, S06-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N04-D, S05-N04-K, S05-N03-R, S05-N05-R, S04-N04-R, S06-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N05-K, S05-N05-R, S05-N04-D, S05-N06-D, S04-N05-D, S06-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N05-K | Coordination of the Signal node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N05-D, S05-N05-R, S05-N04-K, S05-N06-K, S04-N05-K, S06-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the information field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N05-D, S05-N05-K, S05-N04-R, S05-N06-R, S04-N05-R, S06-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N06-D | Diagnostics of the Knowledge node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N06-K, S05-N06-R, S05-N05-D, S05-N07-D, S04-N06-D, S06-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N06-K | Coordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N06-D, S05-N06-R, S05-N05-K, S05-N07-K, S04-N06-K, S06-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N06-D, S05-N06-K, S05-N05-R, S05-N07-R, S04-N06-R, S06-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N07-D | Diagnostics of the "Solution" node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N07-K, S05-N07-R, S05-N06-D, S05-N08-D, S04-N07-D, S06-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N07-K | Coordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N07-D, S05-N07-R, S05-N06-K, S05-N08-K, S04-N07-K, S06-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N07-R | Development of the "Solution" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N07-D, S05-N07-K, S05-N06-R, S05-N08-R, S04-N07-R, S06-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N08-D | Diagnostics of the Action node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N08-K, S05-N08-R, S05-N07-D, S05-N09-D, S04-N08-D, S06-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N08-K | Coordination of the node "Action" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N08-D, S05-N08-R, S05-N07-K, S05-N09-K, S04-N08-K, S06-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the information field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N08-D, S05-N08-K, S05-N07-R, S05-N09-R, S04-N08-R, S06-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N09-D | Diagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the information field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N09-K, S05-N09-R, S05-N08-D, S05-N10-D, S04-N09-D, S06-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N09-D, S05-N09-R, S05-N08-K, S05-N10-K, S04-N09-K, S06-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N09-D, S05-N09-K, S05-N08-R, S05-N10-R, S04-N09-R, S06-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N10-D | Diagnostics of the Risk node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N10-K, S05-N10-R, S05-N09-D, S05-N11-D, S04-N10-D, S06-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N10-K | Coordination of the Risk node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N10-D, S05-N10-R, S05-N09-K, S05-N11-K, S04-N10-K, S06-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the information field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N10-D, S05-N10-K, S05-N09-R, S05-N11-R, S04-N10-R, S06-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N11-K, S05-N11-R, S05-N10-D, S05-N12-D, S04-N11-D, S06-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N11-K | Coordination of the node "Trust" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N11-D, S05-N11-R, S05-N10-K, S05-N12-K, S04-N11-K, S06-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N11-R | The development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N11-D, S05-N11-K, S05-N10-R, S05-N12-R, S04-N11-R, S06-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N12-D | Diagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N12-K, S05-N12-R, S05-N11-D, S05-N13-D, S04-N12-D, S06-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N12-K | Coordination of the node "Cooperation" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N12-D, S05-N12-R, S05-N11-K, S05-N13-K, S04-N12-K, S06-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N12-D, S05-N12-K, S05-N11-R, S05-N13-R, S04-N12-R, S06-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N13-D | Diagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the information field: measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N13-K, S05-N13-R, S05-N12-D, S05-N14-D, S04-N13-D, S06-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N13-K | Coordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N13-D, S05-N13-R, S05-N12-K, S05-N14-K, S04-N13-K, S06-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N13-R | The development of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N13-D, S05-N13-K, S05-N12-R, S05-N14-R, S04-N13-R, S06-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N14-D | Diagnostics of the "Standard" node in the information field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N14-K, S05-N14-R, S05-N13-D, S05-N15-D, S04-N14-D, S06-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N14-K | Coordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N14-D, S05-N14-R, S05-N13-K, S05-N15-K, S04-N14-K, S06-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N14-R | Development of the Standard node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N14-D, S05-N14-K, S05-N13-R, S05-N15-R, S04-N14-R, S06-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N15-D | Diagnostics of the "Finance" node in the information field contour: to measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N15-K, S05-N15-R, S05-N14-D, S05-N16-D, S04-N15-D, S06-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N15-D, S05-N15-R, S05-N14-K, S05-N16-K, S04-N15-K, S06-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N15-R | Development of the "Finance" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N15-D, S05-N15-K, S05-N14-R, S05-N16-R, S04-N15-R, S06-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N16-D | Diagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the information field: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N16-K, S05-N16-R, S05-N15-D, S05-N17-D, S04-N16-D, S06-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the information field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N16-D, S05-N16-R, S05-N15-K, S05-N17-K, S04-N16-K, S06-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N16-R | The development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N16-D, S05-N16-K, S05-N15-R, S05-N17-R, S04-N16-R, S06-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N17-D | Diagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the information field: to measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N17-K, S05-N17-R, S05-N16-D, S05-N18-D, S04-N17-D, S06-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N17-K | Coordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N17-D, S05-N17-R, S05-N16-K, S05-N18-K, S04-N17-K, S06-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N17-D, S05-N17-K, S05-N16-R, S05-N18-R, S04-N17-R, S06-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N18-D | Diagnosis of the node "Environment" in the contour of the information field: to measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N18-K, S05-N18-R, S05-N17-D, S05-N19-D, S04-N18-D, S06-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N18-K | Coordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N18-D, S05-N18-R, S05-N17-K, S05-N19-K, S04-N18-K, S06-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N18-R | Development of the "Environment" node in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N18-D, S05-N18-K, S05-N17-R, S05-N19-R, S04-N18-R, S06-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S05-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the information field: to measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S05-N19-K, S05-N19-R, S05-N18-D, S04-N19-D, S06-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S05-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the information field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S05-N19-D, S05-N19-R, S05-N18-K, S04-N19-K, S06-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S05-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the information field: change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S05-N19-D, S05-N19-K, S05-N18-R, S04-N19-R, S06-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S06 · Man and Consciousness
The function of the family: human potential, competence, perception and learning. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S06-N01-D | Diagnosis of the subject node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N01-K, S06-N01-R, S06-N02-D, S05-N01-D, S07-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N01-K | Coordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N01-D, S06-N01-R, S06-N02-K, S05-N01-K, S07-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N01-R | The development of the subject node in the human field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N01-D, S06-N01-K, S06-N02-R, S05-N01-R, S07-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N02-D | Diagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N02-K, S06-N02-R, S06-N01-D, S06-N03-D, S05-N02-D, S07-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N02-K | Coordination of the "Purpose" node in the human field contour: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N02-D, S06-N02-R, S06-N01-K, S06-N03-K, S05-N02-K, S07-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N02-R | The development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N02-D, S06-N02-K, S06-N01-R, S06-N03-R, S05-N02-R, S07-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N03-K, S06-N03-R, S06-N02-D, S06-N04-D, S05-N03-D, S07-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N03-D, S06-N03-R, S06-N02-K, S06-N04-K, S05-N03-K, S07-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N03-D, S06-N03-K, S06-N02-R, S06-N04-R, S05-N03-R, S07-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N04-K, S06-N04-R, S06-N03-D, S06-N05-D, S05-N04-D, S07-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N04-D, S06-N04-R, S06-N03-K, S06-N05-K, S05-N04-K, S07-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N04-D, S06-N04-K, S06-N03-R, S06-N05-R, S05-N04-R, S07-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N05-K, S06-N05-R, S06-N04-D, S06-N06-D, S05-N05-D, S07-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N05-K | Coordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N05-D, S06-N05-R, S06-N04-K, S06-N06-K, S05-N05-K, S07-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N05-D, S06-N05-K, S06-N04-R, S06-N06-R, S05-N05-R, S07-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N06-D | Diagnostics of the Knowledge node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N06-K, S06-N06-R, S06-N05-D, S06-N07-D, S05-N06-D, S07-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N06-K | Coordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N06-D, S06-N06-R, S06-N05-K, S06-N07-K, S05-N06-K, S07-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the human field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N06-D, S06-N06-K, S06-N05-R, S06-N07-R, S05-N06-R, S07-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N07-D | Diagnostics of the "Solution" node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N07-K, S06-N07-R, S06-N06-D, S06-N08-D, S05-N07-D, S07-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N07-K | Coordination of the "Solution" node in the human field contour: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N07-D, S06-N07-R, S06-N06-K, S06-N08-K, S05-N07-K, S07-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N07-R | Development of the “Solution” node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N07-D, S06-N07-K, S06-N06-R, S06-N08-R, S05-N07-R, S07-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N08-D | Diagnostics of the "Action" node in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N08-K, S06-N08-R, S06-N07-D, S06-N09-D, S05-N08-D, S07-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N08-K | Coordination of the "Action" node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N08-D, S06-N08-R, S06-N07-K, S06-N09-K, S05-N08-K, S07-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the human field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N08-D, S06-N08-K, S06-N07-R, S06-N09-R, S05-N08-R, S07-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N09-D | Diagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the human field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N09-K, S06-N09-R, S06-N08-D, S06-N10-D, S05-N09-D, S07-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N09-D, S06-N09-R, S06-N08-K, S06-N10-K, S05-N09-K, S07-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the human field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N09-D, S06-N09-K, S06-N08-R, S06-N10-R, S05-N09-R, S07-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N10-D | Diagnosis of the risk node in the human field contour: measure current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N10-K, S06-N10-R, S06-N09-D, S06-N11-D, S05-N10-D, S07-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N10-K | Coordination of the Risk node in the human field contour: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N10-D, S06-N10-R, S06-N09-K, S06-N11-K, S05-N10-K, S07-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the human field contour: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N10-D, S06-N10-K, S06-N09-R, S06-N11-R, S05-N10-R, S07-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N11-K, S06-N11-R, S06-N10-D, S06-N12-D, S05-N11-D, S07-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N11-K | Coordination of the "Trust" node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N11-D, S06-N11-R, S06-N10-K, S06-N12-K, S05-N11-K, S07-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N11-R | The development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N11-D, S06-N11-K, S06-N10-R, S06-N12-R, S05-N11-R, S07-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N12-D | Diagnosis of the "Cooperation" node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N12-K, S06-N12-R, S06-N11-D, S06-N13-D, S05-N12-D, S07-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N12-K | Coordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N12-D, S06-N12-R, S06-N11-K, S06-N13-K, S05-N12-K, S07-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N12-D, S06-N12-K, S06-N11-R, S06-N13-R, S05-N12-R, S07-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N13-D | Diagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N13-K, S06-N13-R, S06-N12-D, S06-N14-D, S05-N13-D, S07-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N13-K | Coordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N13-D, S06-N13-R, S06-N12-K, S06-N14-K, S05-N13-K, S07-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N13-R | The development of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N13-D, S06-N13-K, S06-N12-R, S06-N14-R, S05-N13-R, S07-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N14-D | Diagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N14-K, S06-N14-R, S06-N13-D, S06-N15-D, S05-N14-D, S07-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N14-K | Coordination of the “Standard” node in the human field contour: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N14-D, S06-N14-R, S06-N13-K, S06-N15-K, S05-N14-K, S07-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N14-R | The development of the “Standard” node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N14-D, S06-N14-K, S06-N13-R, S06-N15-R, S05-N14-R, S07-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N15-D | Diagnosis of the "Finance" node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N15-K, S06-N15-R, S06-N14-D, S06-N16-D, S05-N15-D, S07-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N15-D, S06-N15-R, S06-N14-K, S06-N16-K, S05-N15-K, S07-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N15-R | Development of the "Finance" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N15-D, S06-N15-K, S06-N14-R, S06-N16-R, S05-N15-R, S07-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N16-D | Diagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the human field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N16-K, S06-N16-R, S06-N15-D, S06-N17-D, S05-N16-D, S07-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the human field contour: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N16-D, S06-N16-R, S06-N15-K, S06-N17-K, S05-N16-K, S07-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N16-R | The development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N16-D, S06-N16-K, S06-N15-R, S06-N17-R, S05-N16-R, S07-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N17-D | Diagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N17-K, S06-N17-R, S06-N16-D, S06-N18-D, S05-N17-D, S07-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N17-K | Coordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N17-D, S06-N17-R, S06-N16-K, S06-N18-K, S05-N17-K, S07-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N17-D, S06-N17-K, S06-N16-R, S06-N18-R, S05-N17-R, S07-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N18-D | Diagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the human field: to measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N18-K, S06-N18-R, S06-N17-D, S06-N19-D, S05-N18-D, S07-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N18-K | Coordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of the human field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N18-D, S06-N18-R, S06-N17-K, S06-N19-K, S05-N18-K, S07-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N18-R | The development of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N18-D, S06-N18-K, S06-N17-R, S06-N19-R, S05-N18-R, S07-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S06-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the human field: measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S06-N19-K, S06-N19-R, S06-N18-D, S05-N19-D, S07-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S06-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the human field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S06-N19-D, S06-N19-R, S06-N18-K, S05-N19-K, S07-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S06-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the human field: change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S06-N19-D, S06-N19-K, S06-N18-R, S05-N19-R, S07-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S07 · Cooperation and Networks
The function of the family: connectivity, trust, contracts and networking. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S07-N01-D | Diagnostics of the "Subject" node in the cooperative field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N01-K, S07-N01-R, S07-N02-D, S06-N01-D, S08-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N01-K | Coordination of the "Subject" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N01-D, S07-N01-R, S07-N02-K, S06-N01-K, S08-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N01-R | Development of the subject node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N01-D, S07-N01-K, S07-N02-R, S06-N01-R, S08-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N02-D | Diagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the cooperative field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N02-K, S07-N02-R, S07-N01-D, S07-N03-D, S06-N02-D, S08-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N02-K | Coordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N02-D, S07-N02-R, S07-N01-K, S07-N03-K, S06-N02-K, S08-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N02-R | Development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N02-D, S07-N02-K, S07-N01-R, S07-N03-R, S06-N02-R, S08-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N03-K, S07-N03-R, S07-N02-D, S07-N04-D, S06-N03-D, S08-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N03-D, S07-N03-R, S07-N02-K, S07-N04-K, S06-N03-K, S08-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N03-D, S07-N03-K, S07-N02-R, S07-N04-R, S06-N03-R, S08-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N04-K, S07-N04-R, S07-N03-D, S07-N05-D, S06-N04-D, S08-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N04-D, S07-N04-R, S07-N03-K, S07-N05-K, S06-N04-K, S08-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N04-D, S07-N04-K, S07-N03-R, S07-N05-R, S06-N04-R, S08-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the cooperative field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N05-K, S07-N05-R, S07-N04-D, S07-N06-D, S06-N05-D, S08-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N05-K | Coordination of the "Signal" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N05-D, S07-N05-R, S07-N04-K, S07-N06-K, S06-N05-K, S08-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N05-D, S07-N05-K, S07-N04-R, S07-N06-R, S06-N05-R, S08-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N06-D | Diagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N06-K, S07-N06-R, S07-N05-D, S07-N07-D, S06-N06-D, S08-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N06-K | Coordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the cooperation field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N06-D, S07-N06-R, S07-N05-K, S07-N07-K, S06-N06-K, S08-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N06-D, S07-N06-K, S07-N05-R, S07-N07-R, S06-N06-R, S08-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N07-D | Diagnostics of the node "Solution" in the contour of the cooperative field: measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N07-K, S07-N07-R, S07-N06-D, S07-N08-D, S06-N07-D, S08-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N07-K | Coordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the cooperation field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N07-D, S07-N07-R, S07-N06-K, S07-N08-K, S06-N07-K, S08-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N07-R | Development of the "Solution" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N07-D, S07-N07-K, S07-N06-R, S07-N08-R, S06-N07-R, S08-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N08-D | Diagnostics of the "Action" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N08-K, S07-N08-R, S07-N07-D, S07-N09-D, S06-N08-D, S08-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N08-K | Coordination of the "Action" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N08-D, S07-N08-R, S07-N07-K, S07-N09-K, S06-N08-K, S08-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N08-D, S07-N08-K, S07-N07-R, S07-N09-R, S06-N08-R, S08-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N09-D | Diagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N09-K, S07-N09-R, S07-N08-D, S07-N10-D, S06-N09-D, S08-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N09-D, S07-N09-R, S07-N08-K, S07-N10-K, S06-N09-K, S08-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N09-D, S07-N09-K, S07-N08-R, S07-N10-R, S06-N09-R, S08-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N10-D | Diagnosis of the Risk node in the cooperative field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N10-K, S07-N10-R, S07-N09-D, S07-N11-D, S06-N10-D, S08-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N10-K | Coordination of the Risk node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N10-D, S07-N10-R, S07-N09-K, S07-N11-K, S06-N10-K, S08-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N10-D, S07-N10-K, S07-N09-R, S07-N11-R, S06-N10-R, S08-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N11-K, S07-N11-R, S07-N10-D, S07-N12-D, S06-N11-D, S08-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N11-K | Coordination of the "Trust" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N11-D, S07-N11-R, S07-N10-K, S07-N12-K, S06-N11-K, S08-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N11-R | Development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N11-D, S07-N11-K, S07-N10-R, S07-N12-R, S06-N11-R, S08-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N12-D | Diagnosis of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N12-K, S07-N12-R, S07-N11-D, S07-N13-D, S06-N12-D, S08-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N12-K | Coordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N12-D, S07-N12-R, S07-N11-K, S07-N13-K, S06-N12-K, S08-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N12-D, S07-N12-K, S07-N11-R, S07-N13-R, S06-N12-R, S08-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N13-D | Diagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N13-K, S07-N13-R, S07-N12-D, S07-N14-D, S06-N13-D, S08-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N13-K | Coordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N13-D, S07-N13-R, S07-N12-K, S07-N14-K, S06-N13-K, S08-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N13-R | Development of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N13-D, S07-N13-K, S07-N12-R, S07-N14-R, S06-N13-R, S08-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N14-D | Diagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N14-K, S07-N14-R, S07-N13-D, S07-N15-D, S06-N14-D, S08-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N14-K | Coordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N14-D, S07-N14-R, S07-N13-K, S07-N15-K, S06-N14-K, S08-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N14-R | Development of the Standard node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N14-D, S07-N14-K, S07-N13-R, S07-N15-R, S06-N14-R, S08-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N15-D | Diagnosis of the "Finance" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N15-K, S07-N15-R, S07-N14-D, S07-N16-D, S06-N15-D, S08-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N15-D, S07-N15-R, S07-N14-K, S07-N16-K, S06-N15-K, S08-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N15-R | Development of the "Finance" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N15-D, S07-N15-K, S07-N14-R, S07-N16-R, S06-N15-R, S08-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N16-D | Diagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N16-K, S07-N16-R, S07-N15-D, S07-N17-D, S06-N16-D, S08-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N16-D, S07-N16-R, S07-N15-K, S07-N17-K, S06-N16-K, S08-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N16-R | Development of the Personnel node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N16-D, S07-N16-K, S07-N15-R, S07-N17-R, S06-N16-R, S08-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N17-D | Diagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N17-K, S07-N17-R, S07-N16-D, S07-N18-D, S06-N17-D, S08-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N17-K | Coordination of the "Technology" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N17-D, S07-N17-R, S07-N16-K, S07-N18-K, S06-N17-K, S08-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N17-D, S07-N17-K, S07-N16-R, S07-N18-R, S06-N17-R, S08-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N18-D | Diagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the cooperative field: measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N18-K, S07-N18-R, S07-N17-D, S07-N19-D, S06-N18-D, S08-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N18-K | Coordination of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the cooperation field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N18-D, S07-N18-R, S07-N17-K, S07-N19-K, S06-N18-K, S08-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N18-R | Development of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N18-D, S07-N18-K, S07-N17-R, S07-N19-R, S06-N18-R, S08-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S07-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the cooperation field: measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S07-N19-K, S07-N19-R, S07-N18-D, S06-N19-D, S08-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S07-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the cooperation field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S07-N19-D, S07-N19-R, S07-N18-K, S06-N19-K, S08-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S07-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the cooperation field: change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S07-N19-D, S07-N19-K, S07-N18-R, S06-N19-R, S08-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S08 · Balance and sustainability
Family Function: Balance, Resilience, Adaptation and Recovery. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S08-N01-D | Diagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N01-K, S08-N01-R, S08-N02-D, S07-N01-D, S09-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N01-K | Coordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of a stable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N01-D, S08-N01-R, S08-N02-K, S07-N01-K, S09-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N01-R | Development of the subject node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N01-D, S08-N01-K, S08-N02-R, S07-N01-R, S09-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N02-D | Diagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N02-K, S08-N02-R, S08-N01-D, S08-N03-D, S07-N02-D, S09-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N02-K | Coordination of the “Purpose” node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N02-D, S08-N02-R, S08-N01-K, S08-N03-K, S07-N02-K, S09-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N02-R | The development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N02-D, S08-N02-K, S08-N01-R, S08-N03-R, S07-N02-R, S09-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N03-K, S08-N03-R, S08-N02-D, S08-N04-D, S07-N03-D, S09-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of a stable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N03-D, S08-N03-R, S08-N02-K, S08-N04-K, S07-N03-K, S09-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N03-D, S08-N03-K, S08-N02-R, S08-N04-R, S07-N03-R, S09-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N04-K, S08-N04-R, S08-N03-D, S08-N05-D, S07-N04-D, S09-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N04-D, S08-N04-R, S08-N03-K, S08-N05-K, S07-N04-K, S09-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N04-D, S08-N04-K, S08-N03-R, S08-N05-R, S07-N04-R, S09-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N05-K, S08-N05-R, S08-N04-D, S08-N06-D, S07-N05-D, S09-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N05-K | Coordination of the Signal node in the contour of a stable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N05-D, S08-N05-R, S08-N04-K, S08-N06-K, S07-N05-K, S09-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N05-D, S08-N05-K, S08-N04-R, S08-N06-R, S07-N05-R, S09-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N06-D | Diagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N06-K, S08-N06-R, S08-N05-D, S08-N07-D, S07-N06-D, S09-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N06-K | Coordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of a stable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N06-D, S08-N06-R, S08-N05-K, S08-N07-K, S07-N06-K, S09-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N06-D, S08-N06-K, S08-N05-R, S08-N07-R, S07-N06-R, S09-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N07-D | Diagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N07-K, S08-N07-R, S08-N06-D, S08-N08-D, S07-N07-D, S09-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N07-K | Coordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of a stable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N07-D, S08-N07-R, S08-N06-K, S08-N08-K, S07-N07-K, S09-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N07-R | Development of the "Solution" node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N07-D, S08-N07-K, S08-N06-R, S08-N08-R, S07-N07-R, S09-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N08-D | Diagnostics of the Action node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N08-K, S08-N08-R, S08-N07-D, S08-N09-D, S07-N08-D, S09-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N08-K | Coordination of the Action node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N08-D, S08-N08-R, S08-N07-K, S08-N09-K, S07-N08-K, S09-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N08-D, S08-N08-K, S08-N07-R, S08-N09-R, S07-N08-R, S09-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N09-D | Diagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N09-K, S08-N09-R, S08-N08-D, S08-N10-D, S07-N09-D, S09-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N09-K | Coordination of the feedback node in the contour of a stable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N09-D, S08-N09-R, S08-N08-K, S08-N10-K, S07-N09-K, S09-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N09-D, S08-N09-K, S08-N08-R, S08-N10-R, S07-N09-R, S09-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N10-D | Diagnosis of the Risk node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N10-K, S08-N10-R, S08-N09-D, S08-N11-D, S07-N10-D, S09-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N10-K | Coordination of the Risk node in the contour of a stable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N10-D, S08-N10-R, S08-N09-K, S08-N11-K, S07-N10-K, S09-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N10-D, S08-N10-K, S08-N09-R, S08-N11-R, S07-N10-R, S09-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N11-K, S08-N11-R, S08-N10-D, S08-N12-D, S07-N11-D, S09-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N11-K | Coordination of the “Trust” node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N11-D, S08-N11-R, S08-N10-K, S08-N12-K, S07-N11-K, S09-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N11-R | The development of the “Trust” node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N11-D, S08-N11-K, S08-N10-R, S08-N12-R, S07-N11-R, S09-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N12-D | Diagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N12-K, S08-N12-R, S08-N11-D, S08-N13-D, S07-N12-D, S09-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N12-K | Coordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N12-D, S08-N12-R, S08-N11-K, S08-N13-K, S07-N12-K, S09-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N12-D, S08-N12-K, S08-N11-R, S08-N13-R, S07-N12-R, S09-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N13-D | Diagnostics of the Infrastructure node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N13-K, S08-N13-R, S08-N12-D, S08-N14-D, S07-N13-D, S09-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N13-K | Coordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N13-D, S08-N13-R, S08-N12-K, S08-N14-K, S07-N13-K, S09-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N13-R | Development of the Infrastructure node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N13-D, S08-N13-K, S08-N12-R, S08-N14-R, S07-N13-R, S09-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N14-D | Diagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N14-K, S08-N14-R, S08-N13-D, S08-N15-D, S07-N14-D, S09-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N14-K | Coordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of a sustainable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N14-D, S08-N14-R, S08-N13-K, S08-N15-K, S07-N14-K, S09-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N14-R | Development of the Standard node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N14-D, S08-N14-K, S08-N13-R, S08-N15-R, S07-N14-R, S09-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N15-D | Diagnostics of the Finance node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N15-K, S08-N15-R, S08-N14-D, S08-N16-D, S07-N15-D, S09-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of a sustainable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N15-D, S08-N15-R, S08-N14-K, S08-N16-K, S07-N15-K, S09-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N15-R | Development of the Finance node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N15-D, S08-N15-K, S08-N14-R, S08-N16-R, S07-N15-R, S09-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N16-D | Diagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N16-K, S08-N16-R, S08-N15-D, S08-N17-D, S07-N16-D, S09-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of a stable field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N16-D, S08-N16-R, S08-N15-K, S08-N17-K, S07-N16-K, S09-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N16-R | The development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N16-D, S08-N16-K, S08-N15-R, S08-N17-R, S07-N16-R, S09-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N17-D | Diagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N17-K, S08-N17-R, S08-N16-D, S08-N18-D, S07-N17-D, S09-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N17-K | Coordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of a sustainable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N17-D, S08-N17-R, S08-N16-K, S08-N18-K, S07-N17-K, S09-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of a sustainable field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N17-D, S08-N17-K, S08-N16-R, S08-N18-R, S07-N17-R, S09-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N18-D | Diagnosis of the node "Environment" in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N18-K, S08-N18-R, S08-N17-D, S08-N19-D, S07-N18-D, S09-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N18-K | Coordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of a stable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N18-D, S08-N18-R, S08-N17-K, S08-N19-K, S07-N18-K, S09-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N18-R | Development of the node "Environment" in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N18-D, S08-N18-K, S08-N17-R, S08-N19-R, S07-N18-R, S09-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S08-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of a stable field: measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S08-N19-K, S08-N19-R, S08-N18-D, S07-N19-D, S09-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S08-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of a stable field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S08-N19-D, S08-N19-R, S08-N18-K, S07-N19-K, S09-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S08-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of a stable field: change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S08-N19-D, S08-N19-K, S08-N18-R, S07-N19-R, S09-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S09 · Evolution and innovation
Family function: updating, experimentation, R&D, and scaling. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S09-N01-D | Diagnosis of the subject node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N01-K, S09-N01-R, S09-N02-D, S08-N01-D, S10-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N01-K | Coordination of the subject node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N01-D, S09-N01-R, S09-N02-K, S08-N01-K, S10-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N01-R | Development of the subject node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N01-D, S09-N01-K, S09-N02-R, S08-N01-R, S10-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N02-D | Diagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N02-K, S09-N02-R, S09-N01-D, S09-N03-D, S08-N02-D, S10-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N02-K | Coordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N02-D, S09-N02-R, S09-N01-K, S09-N03-K, S08-N02-K, S10-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N02-R | The development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N02-D, S09-N02-K, S09-N01-R, S09-N03-R, S08-N02-R, S10-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N03-K, S09-N03-R, S09-N02-D, S09-N04-D, S08-N03-D, S10-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N03-K | Coordination of the "Border" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N03-D, S09-N03-R, S09-N02-K, S09-N04-K, S08-N03-K, S10-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N03-D, S09-N03-K, S09-N02-R, S09-N04-R, S08-N03-R, S10-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N04-K, S09-N04-R, S09-N03-D, S09-N05-D, S08-N04-D, S10-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N04-D, S09-N04-R, S09-N03-K, S09-N05-K, S08-N04-K, S10-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N04-D, S09-N04-K, S09-N03-R, S09-N05-R, S08-N04-R, S10-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N05-D | Diagnostics of the signal node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N05-K, S09-N05-R, S09-N04-D, S09-N06-D, S08-N05-D, S10-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N05-K | Coordination of the Signal node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N05-D, S09-N05-R, S09-N04-K, S09-N06-K, S08-N05-K, S10-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N05-D, S09-N05-K, S09-N04-R, S09-N06-R, S08-N05-R, S10-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N06-D | Diagnosis of the Knowledge node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N06-K, S09-N06-R, S09-N05-D, S09-N07-D, S08-N06-D, S10-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N06-K | Coordination of the Knowledge node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N06-D, S09-N06-R, S09-N05-K, S09-N07-K, S08-N06-K, S10-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N06-D, S09-N06-K, S09-N05-R, S09-N07-R, S08-N06-R, S10-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N07-D | Diagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N07-K, S09-N07-R, S09-N06-D, S09-N08-D, S08-N07-D, S10-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N07-K | Coordination of the “Solution” node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N07-D, S09-N07-R, S09-N06-K, S09-N08-K, S08-N07-K, S10-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N07-R | Development of the “Solution” node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N07-D, S09-N07-K, S09-N06-R, S09-N08-R, S08-N07-R, S10-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N08-D | Diagnostics of the "Action" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N08-K, S09-N08-R, S09-N07-D, S09-N09-D, S08-N08-D, S10-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N08-K | Coordination of the "Action" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints, and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N08-D, S09-N08-R, S09-N07-K, S09-N09-K, S08-N08-K, S10-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N08-D, S09-N08-K, S09-N07-R, S09-N09-R, S08-N08-R, S10-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N09-D | Diagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N09-K, S09-N09-R, S09-N08-D, S09-N10-D, S08-N09-D, S10-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N09-D, S09-N09-R, S09-N08-K, S09-N10-K, S08-N09-K, S10-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N09-D, S09-N09-K, S09-N08-R, S09-N10-R, S08-N09-R, S10-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N10-D | Diagnosis of the risk node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N10-K, S09-N10-R, S09-N09-D, S09-N11-D, S08-N10-D, S10-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N10-K | Coordination of the node "Risk" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N10-D, S09-N10-R, S09-N09-K, S09-N11-K, S08-N10-K, S10-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N10-D, S09-N10-K, S09-N09-R, S09-N11-R, S08-N10-R, S10-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N11-K, S09-N11-R, S09-N10-D, S09-N12-D, S08-N11-D, S10-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N11-K | Coordination of the node "Trust" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N11-D, S09-N11-R, S09-N10-K, S09-N12-K, S08-N11-K, S10-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N11-R | The development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N11-D, S09-N11-K, S09-N10-R, S09-N12-R, S08-N11-R, S10-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N12-D | Diagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N12-K, S09-N12-R, S09-N11-D, S09-N13-D, S08-N12-D, S10-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N12-K | Coordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N12-D, S09-N12-R, S09-N11-K, S09-N13-K, S08-N12-K, S10-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N12-D, S09-N12-K, S09-N11-R, S09-N13-R, S08-N12-R, S10-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N13-D | Diagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N13-K, S09-N13-R, S09-N12-D, S09-N14-D, S08-N13-D, S10-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N13-K | Coordination of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N13-D, S09-N13-R, S09-N12-K, S09-N14-K, S08-N13-K, S10-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N13-R | Development of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N13-D, S09-N13-K, S09-N12-R, S09-N14-R, S08-N13-R, S10-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N14-D | Diagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N14-K, S09-N14-R, S09-N13-D, S09-N15-D, S08-N14-D, S10-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N14-K | Coordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N14-D, S09-N14-R, S09-N13-K, S09-N15-K, S08-N14-K, S10-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N14-R | Development of the Standard node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N14-D, S09-N14-K, S09-N13-R, S09-N15-R, S08-N14-R, S10-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N15-D | Diagnosis of the "Finance" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N15-K, S09-N15-R, S09-N14-D, S09-N16-D, S08-N15-D, S10-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N15-D, S09-N15-R, S09-N14-K, S09-N16-K, S08-N15-K, S10-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N15-R | Development of the "Finance" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N15-D, S09-N15-K, S09-N14-R, S09-N16-R, S08-N15-R, S10-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N16-D | Diagnosis of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N16-K, S09-N16-R, S09-N15-D, S09-N17-D, S08-N16-D, S10-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: coordinate participants, constraints and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N16-D, S09-N16-R, S09-N15-K, S09-N17-K, S08-N16-K, S10-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N16-R | Development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N16-D, S09-N16-K, S09-N15-R, S09-N17-R, S08-N16-R, S10-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N17-D | Diagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N17-K, S09-N17-R, S09-N16-D, S09-N18-D, S08-N17-D, S10-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N17-K | Coordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N17-D, S09-N17-R, S09-N16-K, S09-N18-K, S08-N17-K, S10-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N17-R | Development of the node "Technology" in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N17-D, S09-N17-K, S09-N16-R, S09-N18-R, S08-N17-R, S10-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N18-D | Diagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N18-K, S09-N18-R, S09-N17-D, S09-N19-D, S08-N18-D, S10-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N18-K | Coordination of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N18-D, S09-N18-R, S09-N17-K, S09-N19-K, S08-N18-K, S10-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N18-R | Development of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N18-D, S09-N18-K, S09-N17-R, S09-N19-R, S08-N18-R, S10-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S09-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S09-N19-K, S09-N19-R, S09-N18-D, S08-N19-D, S10-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S09-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the evolutionary field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S09-N19-D, S09-N19-R, S09-N18-K, S08-N19-K, S10-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S09-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the evolutionary field: change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S09-N19-D, S09-N19-K, S09-N18-R, S08-N19-R, S10-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S10 · Creation and production
Family function: value creation, production, services and execution infrastructure. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S10-N01-D | Diagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N01-K, S10-N01-R, S10-N02-D, S09-N01-D, S11-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N01-K | Coordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N01-D, S10-N01-R, S10-N02-K, S09-N01-K, S11-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N01-R | Development of the subject node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N01-D, S10-N01-K, S10-N02-R, S09-N01-R, S11-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N02-D | Diagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N02-K, S10-N02-R, S10-N01-D, S10-N03-D, S09-N02-D, S11-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N02-K | Coordination of the “Purpose” node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N02-D, S10-N02-R, S10-N01-K, S10-N03-K, S09-N02-K, S11-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N02-R | The development of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N02-D, S10-N02-K, S10-N01-R, S10-N03-R, S09-N02-R, S11-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N03-K, S10-N03-R, S10-N02-D, S10-N04-D, S09-N03-D, S11-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N03-D, S10-N03-R, S10-N02-K, S10-N04-K, S09-N03-K, S11-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N03-D, S10-N03-K, S10-N02-R, S10-N04-R, S09-N03-R, S11-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N04-K, S10-N04-R, S10-N03-D, S10-N05-D, S09-N04-D, S11-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N04-D, S10-N04-R, S10-N03-K, S10-N05-K, S09-N04-K, S11-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N04-D, S10-N04-K, S10-N03-R, S10-N05-R, S09-N04-R, S11-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N05-K, S10-N05-R, S10-N04-D, S10-N06-D, S09-N05-D, S11-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N05-K | Coordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N05-D, S10-N05-R, S10-N04-K, S10-N06-K, S09-N05-K, S11-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N05-D, S10-N05-K, S10-N04-R, S10-N06-R, S09-N05-R, S11-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N06-D | Diagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N06-K, S10-N06-R, S10-N05-D, S10-N07-D, S09-N06-D, S11-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N06-K | Coordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N06-D, S10-N06-R, S10-N05-K, S10-N07-K, S09-N06-K, S11-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N06-D, S10-N06-K, S10-N05-R, S10-N07-R, S09-N06-R, S11-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N07-D | Diagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N07-K, S10-N07-R, S10-N06-D, S10-N08-D, S09-N07-D, S11-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N07-K | Coordination of the “Solution” node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N07-D, S10-N07-R, S10-N06-K, S10-N08-K, S09-N07-K, S11-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N07-R | Development of the “Solution” node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N07-D, S10-N07-K, S10-N06-R, S10-N08-R, S09-N07-R, S11-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N08-D | Diagnostics of the "Action" node in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N08-K, S10-N08-R, S10-N07-D, S10-N09-D, S09-N08-D, S11-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N08-K | Coordination of the Action node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N08-D, S10-N08-R, S10-N07-K, S10-N09-K, S09-N08-K, S11-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N08-D, S10-N08-K, S10-N07-R, S10-N09-R, S09-N08-R, S11-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N09-D | Diagnostics of the feedback node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N09-K, S10-N09-R, S10-N08-D, S10-N10-D, S09-N09-D, S11-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N09-D, S10-N09-R, S10-N08-K, S10-N10-K, S09-N09-K, S11-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N09-D, S10-N09-K, S10-N08-R, S10-N10-R, S09-N09-R, S11-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N10-D | Diagnostics of the Risk node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N10-K, S10-N10-R, S10-N09-D, S10-N11-D, S09-N10-D, S11-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N10-K | Coordination of the node "Risk" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N10-D, S10-N10-R, S10-N09-K, S10-N11-K, S09-N10-K, S11-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N10-D, S10-N10-K, S10-N09-R, S10-N11-R, S09-N10-R, S11-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N11-K, S10-N11-R, S10-N10-D, S10-N12-D, S09-N11-D, S11-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N11-K | Coordination of the “Trust” node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N11-D, S10-N11-R, S10-N10-K, S10-N12-K, S09-N11-K, S11-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N11-R | The development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N11-D, S10-N11-K, S10-N10-R, S10-N12-R, S09-N11-R, S11-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N12-D | Diagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N12-K, S10-N12-R, S10-N11-D, S10-N13-D, S09-N12-D, S11-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N12-K | Coordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N12-D, S10-N12-R, S10-N11-K, S10-N13-K, S09-N12-K, S11-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N12-D, S10-N12-K, S10-N11-R, S10-N13-R, S09-N12-R, S11-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N13-D | Diagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N13-K, S10-N13-R, S10-N12-D, S10-N14-D, S09-N13-D, S11-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N13-K | Coordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N13-D, S10-N13-R, S10-N12-K, S10-N14-K, S09-N13-K, S11-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N13-R | Development of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N13-D, S10-N13-K, S10-N12-R, S10-N14-R, S09-N13-R, S11-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N14-D | Diagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N14-K, S10-N14-R, S10-N13-D, S10-N15-D, S09-N14-D, S11-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N14-K | Coordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N14-D, S10-N14-R, S10-N13-K, S10-N15-K, S09-N14-K, S11-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N14-R | Development of the Standard node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N14-D, S10-N14-K, S10-N13-R, S10-N15-R, S09-N14-R, S11-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N15-D | Diagnostics of the "Finance" node in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N15-K, S10-N15-R, S10-N14-D, S10-N16-D, S09-N15-D, S11-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N15-D, S10-N15-R, S10-N14-K, S10-N16-K, S09-N15-K, S11-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N15-R | Development of the “Finance” node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N15-D, S10-N15-K, S10-N14-R, S10-N16-R, S09-N15-R, S11-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N16-D | Diagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N16-K, S10-N16-R, S10-N15-D, S10-N17-D, S09-N16-D, S11-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N16-D, S10-N16-R, S10-N15-K, S10-N17-K, S09-N16-K, S11-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N16-R | Development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N16-D, S10-N16-K, S10-N15-R, S10-N17-R, S09-N16-R, S11-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N17-D | Diagnostics of the node "Technology" in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N17-K, S10-N17-R, S10-N16-D, S10-N18-D, S09-N17-D, S11-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N17-K | Coordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N17-D, S10-N17-R, S10-N16-K, S10-N18-K, S09-N17-K, S11-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N17-D, S10-N17-K, S10-N16-R, S10-N18-R, S09-N17-R, S11-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N18-D | Diagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the creative field: to measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N18-K, S10-N18-R, S10-N17-D, S10-N19-D, S09-N18-D, S11-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N18-K | Coordination of the “Wednesday” node in the contour of the creative field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N18-D, S10-N18-R, S10-N17-K, S10-N19-K, S09-N18-K, S11-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N18-R | Development of the “Wednesday” node in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N18-D, S10-N18-K, S10-N17-R, S10-N19-R, S09-N18-R, S11-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S10-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the creative field: measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S10-N19-K, S10-N19-R, S10-N18-D, S09-N19-D, S11-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S10-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the creative field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S10-N19-D, S10-N19-R, S10-N18-K, S09-N19-K, S11-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S10-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the creative field: change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S10-N19-D, S10-N19-K, S10-N18-R, S09-N19-R, S11-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S11 · Navigation and strategy
Family function: priorities, routes, portfolios and strategic choices. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S11-N01-D | Diagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N01-K, S11-N01-R, S11-N02-D, S10-N01-D, S12-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N01-K | Coordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N01-D, S11-N01-R, S11-N02-K, S10-N01-K, S12-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N01-R | Development of the subject node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N01-D, S11-N01-K, S11-N02-R, S10-N01-R, S12-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N02-D | Diagnostics of the Target node in the strategic field contour: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N02-K, S11-N02-R, S11-N01-D, S11-N03-D, S10-N02-D, S12-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N02-K | Coordination of the “Purpose” node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N02-D, S11-N02-R, S11-N01-K, S11-N03-K, S10-N02-K, S12-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N02-R | The development of the “Target” node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N02-D, S11-N02-K, S11-N01-R, S11-N03-R, S10-N02-R, S12-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N03-K, S11-N03-R, S11-N02-D, S11-N04-D, S10-N03-D, S12-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N03-D, S11-N03-R, S11-N02-K, S11-N04-K, S10-N03-K, S12-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N03-D, S11-N03-K, S11-N02-R, S11-N04-R, S10-N03-R, S12-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N04-K, S11-N04-R, S11-N03-D, S11-N05-D, S10-N04-D, S12-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N04-D, S11-N04-R, S11-N03-K, S11-N05-K, S10-N04-K, S12-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N04-D, S11-N04-K, S11-N03-R, S11-N05-R, S10-N04-R, S12-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the outline of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N05-K, S11-N05-R, S11-N04-D, S11-N06-D, S10-N05-D, S12-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N05-K | Coordination of the Signal node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N05-D, S11-N05-R, S11-N04-K, S11-N06-K, S10-N05-K, S12-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N05-D, S11-N05-K, S11-N04-R, S11-N06-R, S10-N05-R, S12-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N06-D | Diagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N06-K, S11-N06-R, S11-N05-D, S11-N07-D, S10-N06-D, S12-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N06-K | Coordination of the Knowledge node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N06-D, S11-N06-R, S11-N05-K, S11-N07-K, S10-N06-K, S12-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N06-D, S11-N06-K, S11-N05-R, S11-N07-R, S10-N06-R, S12-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N07-D | Diagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N07-K, S11-N07-R, S11-N06-D, S11-N08-D, S10-N07-D, S12-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N07-K | Coordination of the “Solution” node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N07-D, S11-N07-R, S11-N06-K, S11-N08-K, S10-N07-K, S12-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N07-R | Development of the “Solution” node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N07-D, S11-N07-K, S11-N06-R, S11-N08-R, S10-N07-R, S12-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N08-D | Diagnostics of the Action node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N08-K, S11-N08-R, S11-N07-D, S11-N09-D, S10-N08-D, S12-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N08-K | Coordination of the Action node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N08-D, S11-N08-R, S11-N07-K, S11-N09-K, S10-N08-K, S12-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N08-D, S11-N08-K, S11-N07-R, S11-N09-R, S10-N08-R, S12-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N09-D | Diagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N09-K, S11-N09-R, S11-N08-D, S11-N10-D, S10-N09-D, S12-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N09-D, S11-N09-R, S11-N08-K, S11-N10-K, S10-N09-K, S12-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N09-D, S11-N09-K, S11-N08-R, S11-N10-R, S10-N09-R, S12-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N10-D | Diagnosis of the Risk node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N10-K, S11-N10-R, S11-N09-D, S11-N11-D, S10-N10-D, S12-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N10-K | Coordination of the Risk node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N10-D, S11-N10-R, S11-N09-K, S11-N11-K, S10-N10-K, S12-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N10-D, S11-N10-K, S11-N09-R, S11-N11-R, S10-N10-R, S12-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N11-K, S11-N11-R, S11-N10-D, S11-N12-D, S10-N11-D, S12-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N11-K | Coordination of the “Trust” node in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N11-D, S11-N11-R, S11-N10-K, S11-N12-K, S10-N11-K, S12-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N11-R | The development of the “Trust” node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N11-D, S11-N11-K, S11-N10-R, S11-N12-R, S10-N11-R, S12-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N12-D | Diagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N12-K, S11-N12-R, S11-N11-D, S11-N13-D, S10-N12-D, S12-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N12-K | Coordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N12-D, S11-N12-R, S11-N11-K, S11-N13-K, S10-N12-K, S12-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N12-R | Development of the cooperation node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N12-D, S11-N12-K, S11-N11-R, S11-N13-R, S10-N12-R, S12-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N13-D | Diagnostics of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N13-K, S11-N13-R, S11-N12-D, S11-N14-D, S10-N13-D, S12-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N13-K | Coordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N13-D, S11-N13-R, S11-N12-K, S11-N14-K, S10-N13-K, S12-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N13-R | Development of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N13-D, S11-N13-K, S11-N12-R, S11-N14-R, S10-N13-R, S12-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N14-D | Diagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N14-K, S11-N14-R, S11-N13-D, S11-N15-D, S10-N14-D, S12-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N14-K | Coordination of the “Standard” node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N14-D, S11-N14-R, S11-N13-K, S11-N15-K, S10-N14-K, S12-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N14-R | Development of the Standard node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N14-D, S11-N14-K, S11-N13-R, S11-N15-R, S10-N14-R, S12-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N15-D | Diagnostics of the "Finance" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N15-K, S11-N15-R, S11-N14-D, S11-N16-D, S10-N15-D, S12-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N15-D, S11-N15-R, S11-N14-K, S11-N16-K, S10-N15-K, S12-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N15-R | Development of the Finance node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N15-D, S11-N15-K, S11-N14-R, S11-N16-R, S10-N15-R, S12-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N16-D | Diagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the strategic field: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N16-K, S11-N16-R, S11-N15-D, S11-N17-D, S10-N16-D, S12-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the strategic field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N16-D, S11-N16-R, S11-N15-K, S11-N17-K, S10-N16-K, S12-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N16-R | Development of the Personnel node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N16-D, S11-N16-K, S11-N15-R, S11-N17-R, S10-N16-R, S12-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N17-D | Diagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N17-K, S11-N17-R, S11-N16-D, S11-N18-D, S10-N17-D, S12-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N17-K | Coordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N17-D, S11-N17-R, S11-N16-K, S11-N18-K, S10-N17-K, S12-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of the strategic field: to change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N17-D, S11-N17-K, S11-N16-R, S11-N18-R, S10-N17-R, S12-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N18-D | Diagnosis of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N18-K, S11-N18-R, S11-N17-D, S11-N19-D, S10-N18-D, S12-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N18-K | Coordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N18-D, S11-N18-R, S11-N17-K, S11-N19-K, S10-N18-K, S12-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N18-R | Development of the “Environment” node in the contour of the strategic field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N18-D, S11-N18-K, S11-N17-R, S11-N19-R, S10-N18-R, S12-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S11-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the strategic field: to measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S11-N19-K, S11-N19-R, S11-N18-D, S10-N19-D, S12-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S11-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the strategic field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S11-N19-D, S11-N19-R, S11-N18-K, S10-N19-K, S12-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S11-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the strategic field: to change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S11-N19-D, S11-N19-K, S11-N18-R, S10-N19-R, S12-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S12 · Life and Ecology
Family function: biocenoses, environment, ecosystem health and natural reproducibility. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S12-N01-D | Diagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N01-K, S12-N01-R, S12-N02-D, S11-N01-D, S13-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N01-K | Coordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N01-D, S12-N01-R, S12-N02-K, S11-N01-K, S13-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N01-R | Development of the subject node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N01-D, S12-N01-K, S12-N02-R, S11-N01-R, S13-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N02-D | Diagnostics of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N02-K, S12-N02-R, S12-N01-D, S12-N03-D, S11-N02-D, S13-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N02-K | Coordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N02-D, S12-N02-R, S12-N01-K, S12-N03-K, S11-N02-K, S13-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N02-R | The development of the "Target" node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N02-D, S12-N02-K, S12-N01-R, S12-N03-R, S11-N02-R, S13-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N03-K, S12-N03-R, S12-N02-D, S12-N04-D, S11-N03-D, S13-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N03-D, S12-N03-R, S12-N02-K, S12-N04-K, S11-N03-K, S13-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N03-D, S12-N03-K, S12-N02-R, S12-N04-R, S11-N03-R, S13-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N04-K, S12-N04-R, S12-N03-D, S12-N05-D, S11-N04-D, S13-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N04-D, S12-N04-R, S12-N03-K, S12-N05-K, S11-N04-K, S13-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N04-D, S12-N04-K, S12-N03-R, S12-N05-R, S11-N04-R, S13-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N05-K, S12-N05-R, S12-N04-D, S12-N06-D, S11-N05-D, S13-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N05-K | Coordination of the signal node in the contour of the environmental field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N05-D, S12-N05-R, S12-N04-K, S12-N06-K, S11-N05-K, S13-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N05-D, S12-N05-K, S12-N04-R, S12-N06-R, S11-N05-R, S13-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N06-D | Diagnostics of the Knowledge node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N06-K, S12-N06-R, S12-N05-D, S12-N07-D, S11-N06-D, S13-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N06-K | Coordination of the "Knowledge" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N06-D, S12-N06-R, S12-N05-K, S12-N07-K, S11-N06-K, S13-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N06-D, S12-N06-K, S12-N05-R, S12-N07-R, S11-N06-R, S13-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N07-D | Diagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N07-K, S12-N07-R, S12-N06-D, S12-N08-D, S11-N07-D, S13-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N07-K | Coordination of the "Solution" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N07-D, S12-N07-R, S12-N06-K, S12-N08-K, S11-N07-K, S13-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N07-R | Development of the "Solution" node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N07-D, S12-N07-K, S12-N06-R, S12-N08-R, S11-N07-R, S13-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N08-D | Diagnostics of the Action node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N08-K, S12-N08-R, S12-N07-D, S12-N09-D, S11-N08-D, S13-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N08-K | Coordination of the "Action" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N08-D, S12-N08-R, S12-N07-K, S12-N09-K, S11-N08-K, S13-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N08-D, S12-N08-K, S12-N07-R, S12-N09-R, S11-N08-R, S13-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N09-D | Diagnostics of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N09-K, S12-N09-R, S12-N08-D, S12-N10-D, S11-N09-D, S13-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the environmental field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N09-D, S12-N09-R, S12-N08-K, S12-N10-K, S11-N09-K, S13-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N09-D, S12-N09-K, S12-N08-R, S12-N10-R, S11-N09-R, S13-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N10-D | Diagnosis of the Risk node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N10-K, S12-N10-R, S12-N09-D, S12-N11-D, S11-N10-D, S13-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N10-K | Coordination of the Risk node in the contour of the environmental field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N10-D, S12-N10-R, S12-N09-K, S12-N11-K, S11-N10-K, S13-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N10-D, S12-N10-K, S12-N09-R, S12-N11-R, S11-N10-R, S13-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N11-K, S12-N11-R, S12-N10-D, S12-N12-D, S11-N11-D, S13-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N11-K | Coordination of the "Trust" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N11-D, S12-N11-R, S12-N10-K, S12-N12-K, S11-N11-K, S13-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N11-R | The development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the ecological field: to change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N11-D, S12-N11-K, S12-N10-R, S12-N12-R, S11-N11-R, S13-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N12-D | Diagnosis of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N12-K, S12-N12-R, S12-N11-D, S12-N13-D, S11-N12-D, S13-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N12-K | Coordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N12-D, S12-N12-R, S12-N11-K, S12-N13-K, S11-N12-K, S13-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N12-D, S12-N12-K, S12-N11-R, S12-N13-R, S11-N12-R, S13-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N13-D | Diagnostics of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N13-K, S12-N13-R, S12-N12-D, S12-N14-D, S11-N13-D, S13-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N13-K | Coordination of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the ecological field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N13-D, S12-N13-R, S12-N12-K, S12-N14-K, S11-N13-K, S13-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N13-R | Development of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N13-D, S12-N13-K, S12-N12-R, S12-N14-R, S11-N13-R, S13-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N14-D | Diagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N14-K, S12-N14-R, S12-N13-D, S12-N15-D, S11-N14-D, S13-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N14-K | Coordination of the "Standard" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N14-D, S12-N14-R, S12-N13-K, S12-N15-K, S11-N14-K, S13-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N14-R | Development of the Standard node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N14-D, S12-N14-K, S12-N13-R, S12-N15-R, S11-N14-R, S13-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N15-D | Diagnosis of the "Finance" node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N15-K, S12-N15-R, S12-N14-D, S12-N16-D, S11-N15-D, S13-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the environmental field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N15-D, S12-N15-R, S12-N14-K, S12-N16-K, S11-N15-K, S13-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N15-R | Development of the "Finance" node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N15-D, S12-N15-K, S12-N14-R, S12-N16-R, S11-N15-R, S13-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N16-D | Diagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N16-K, S12-N16-R, S12-N15-D, S12-N17-D, S11-N16-D, S13-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the environmental field: agree on participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N16-D, S12-N16-R, S12-N15-K, S12-N17-K, S11-N16-K, S13-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N16-R | Development of the Personnel node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N16-D, S12-N16-K, S12-N15-R, S12-N17-R, S11-N16-R, S13-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N17-D | Diagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the environmental field: measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N17-K, S12-N17-R, S12-N16-D, S12-N18-D, S11-N17-D, S13-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N17-K | Coordination of the "Technology" node in the contour of the environmental field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N17-D, S12-N17-R, S12-N16-K, S12-N18-K, S11-N17-K, S13-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N17-D, S12-N17-K, S12-N16-R, S12-N18-R, S11-N17-R, S13-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N18-D | Diagnosis of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the environmental field: to measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N18-K, S12-N18-R, S12-N17-D, S12-N19-D, S11-N18-D, S13-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N18-K | Coordination of the node "Environment" in the contour of the environmental field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N18-D, S12-N18-R, S12-N17-K, S12-N19-K, S11-N18-K, S13-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N18-R | Development of the “Environment” node in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N18-D, S12-N18-K, S12-N17-R, S12-N19-R, S11-N18-R, S13-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S12-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the ecological field: measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S12-N19-K, S12-N19-R, S12-N18-D, S11-N19-D, S13-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S12-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the environmental field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S12-N19-D, S12-N19-R, S12-N18-K, S11-N19-K, S13-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S12-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the ecological field: change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S12-N19-D, S12-N19-K, S12-N18-R, S11-N19-R, S13-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
S13 · Security and integrity
Family function: Threats, protection, continuity and control of critical states. Modules: 57 (19 Node × 3 Status).
| Code | Function | Indicators | Data | Formula | Connections | Validation criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S13-N01-D | Diagnostics of the "Subject" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N01-K, S13-N01-R, S13-N02-D, S12-N01-D, S01-N01-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N01-K | Coordination of the node "Subject" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; consistency index | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N01-D, S13-N01-R, S13-N02-K, S12-N01-K, S01-N01-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N01-R | Development of the subject node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | Identification of subjects; completeness of roles; level of responsibility; increase to the baseline | registers of subjects; organizational structures; contracts; role profiles | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N01-D, S13-N01-K, S13-N02-R, S12-N01-R, S01-N01-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N02-D | Diagnostics of the Target node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | Measurability of objectives; consistency of objectives; proportion of objectives achieved; baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N02-K, S13-N02-R, S13-N01-D, S13-N03-D, S12-N02-D, S01-N02-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N02-K | Coordination of the "Purpose" node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | Measurability of objectives; Coherence of objectives; Percentage of objectives achieved; Coherence index | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N02-D, S13-N02-R, S13-N01-K, S13-N03-K, S12-N02-K, S01-N02-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N02-R | Development of the Target node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | measurability of the goal; consistency of goals; proportion of goals achieved; increase to the baseline | strategies; KPI; programs; decision protocols | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N02-D, S13-N02-K, S13-N01-R, S13-N03-R, S12-N02-R, S01-N02-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N03-D | Diagnostics of the Border node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; contour stability; baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N03-K, S13-N03-R, S13-N02-D, S13-N04-D, S12-N03-D, S01-N03-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N03-K | Coordination of the Border node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | clarity of boundaries; number of boundary conflicts; stability of contour; consistency index | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N03-D, S13-N03-R, S13-N02-K, S13-N04-K, S12-N03-K, S01-N03-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N03-R | Development of the Border node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | clarity of borders; number of border conflicts; stability of the contour; increment to the baseline | contour maps; regulations; access rights; territorial data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N03-D, S13-N03-K, S13-N02-R, S13-N04-R, S12-N03-R, S01-N03-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N04-D | Diagnostics of the Resource node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N04-K, S13-N04-R, S13-N03-D, S13-N05-D, S12-N04-D, S01-N04-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N04-K | Coordination of the Resource node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; consistency index | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N04-D, S13-N04-R, S13-N03-K, S13-N05-K, S12-N04-K, S01-N04-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N04-R | Development of the Resource node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | resource availability; deficit/surplus; efficiency of use; increase to the baseline | balance of resources; warehouse/ERP; energy balance; capacity | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N04-D, S13-N04-K, S13-N03-R, S13-N05-R, S12-N04-R, S01-N04-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N05-D | Diagnostics of the Signal node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; baseline | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N05-K, S13-N05-R, S13-N04-D, S13-N06-D, S12-N05-D, S01-N05-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N05-K | Coordination of the node "Signal" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | reliability of signals; signal delay; proportion of false alarms; consistency index | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N05-D, S13-N05-R, S13-N04-K, S13-N06-K, S12-N05-K, S01-N05-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N05-R | Development of the Signal node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | reliability of signals; signal delay; fraction of false alarms; increment to base line | sensors; event logs; appeals; media/network monitoring | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N05-D, S13-N05-K, S13-N04-R, S13-N06-R, S12-N05-R, S01-N05-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N06-D | Diagnosis of the Knowledge node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N06-K, S13-N06-R, S13-N05-D, S13-N07-D, S12-N06-D, S01-N06-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N06-K | Coordination of the node "Knowledge" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; consistency index | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N06-D, S13-N06-R, S13-N05-K, S13-N07-K, S12-N06-K, S01-N06-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N06-R | Development of the Knowledge node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | completeness of knowledge; relevance of knowledge; level of evidence; increase to the baseline | Research; knowledge bases; publications; expertise; archives | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N06-D, S13-N06-K, S13-N05-R, S13-N07-R, S12-N06-R, S01-N06-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N07-D | Diagnostics of the "Solution" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; baseline | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N07-K, S13-N07-R, S13-N06-D, S13-N08-D, S12-N07-D, S01-N07-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N07-K | Coordination of the node "Solution" in the contour of the protective field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | speed of decision; quality of decision; proportion of decisions executed; consistency index | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N07-D, S13-N07-R, S13-N06-K, S13-N08-K, S12-N07-K, S01-N07-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N07-R | Development of the "Solution" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | speed of decision; quality of decision; share of executed decisions; increase to the base line | EDMS; protocols; tasks; approval logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N07-D, S13-N07-K, S13-N06-R, S13-N08-R, S12-N07-R, S01-N07-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N08-D | Diagnostics of the Action node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N08-K, S13-N08-R, S13-N07-D, S13-N09-D, S12-N08-D, S01-N08-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N08-K | Coordination of the node "Action" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; consistency index | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N08-D, S13-N08-R, S13-N07-K, S13-N09-K, S12-N08-K, S01-N08-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N08-R | Development of the Action node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | intensity of actions; compliance with deadlines; effectiveness of actions; increase to the baseline | work plans; trackers; production systems; execution acts | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N08-D, S13-N08-K, S13-N07-R, S13-N09-R, S12-N08-R, S01-N08-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N09-D | Diagnosis of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; baseline | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N09-K, S13-N09-R, S13-N08-D, S13-N10-D, S12-N09-D, S01-N09-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N09-K | Coordination of the "Feedback" node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; proportion of closed deviations; consistency index | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N09-D, S13-N09-R, S13-N08-K, S13-N10-K, S12-N09-K, S01-N09-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N09-R | Development of the feedback node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | frequency of feedback; correction rate; the proportion of closed deviations; increase to the base line | user feedback; audits; telemetry; control measurements | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N09-D, S13-N09-K, S13-N08-R, S13-N10-R, S12-N09-R, S01-N09-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N10-D | Diagnosis of the Risk node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N10-K, S13-N10-R, S13-N09-D, S13-N11-D, S12-N10-D, S01-N10-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N10-K | Coordination of the node "Risk" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; consistency index | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N10-D, S13-N10-R, S13-N09-K, S13-N11-K, S12-N10-K, S01-N10-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N10-R | Development of the Risk node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | probability of risk; extent of damage; residual risk; increment to baseline | risk registers; incidents; insurance events; scenario models | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N10-D, S13-N10-K, S13-N09-R, S13-N11-R, S12-N10-R, S01-N10-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N11-D | Diagnostics of the "Trust" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N11-K, S13-N11-R, S13-N10-D, S13-N12-D, S12-N11-D, S01-N11-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N11-K | Coordination of the node "Trust" in the contour of the protective field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; consistency index | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N11-D, S13-N11-R, S13-N10-K, S13-N12-K, S12-N11-K, S01-N11-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N11-R | Development of the "Trust" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | trust index; share of confirmed commitments; stability of interactions; increase to baseline | history of obligations; ratings; contracts; trust surveys | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N11-D, S13-N11-K, S13-N10-R, S13-N12-R, S12-N11-R, S01-N11-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N12-D | Diagnostics of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N12-K, S13-N12-R, S13-N11-D, S13-N13-D, S12-N12-D, S01-N12-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N12-K | Coordination of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | number of active links; density of cooperation; proportion of joint projects; consistency index | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N12-D, S13-N12-R, S13-N11-K, S13-N13-K, S12-N12-K, S01-N12-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N12-R | Development of the "Cooperation" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | number of active links; density of cooperation; share of joint projects; increase to the baseline | graph links; agreements; consortia; joint projects | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N12-D, S13-N12-K, S13-N11-R, S13-N13-R, S12-N12-R, S01-N12-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N13-D | Diagnostics of the Infrastructure node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N13-K, S13-N13-R, S13-N12-D, S13-N14-D, S12-N13-D, S01-N13-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N13-K | Coordination of the node "Infrastructure" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; consistency index | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N13-D, S13-N13-R, S13-N12-K, S13-N14-K, S12-N13-K, S01-N13-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N13-R | Development of the "Infrastructure" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | infrastructure availability; reliability; capacity utilization; increase to base line | GIS; object passports; dispatching; operational logs | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N13-D, S13-N13-K, S13-N12-R, S13-N14-R, S12-N13-R, S01-N13-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N14-D | Diagnostics of the "Standard" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N14-K, S13-N14-R, S13-N13-D, S13-N15-D, S12-N14-D, S01-N14-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N14-K | Coordination of the node "Standard" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | standards coverage; compliance; number of deviations; consistency index | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N14-D, S13-N14-R, S13-N13-K, S13-N15-K, S12-N14-K, S01-N14-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N14-R | Development of the Standard node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | coverage standards; compliance; number of deviations; increase to baseline | normative documents; standards; checklists; audit results | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N14-D, S13-N14-K, S13-N13-R, S13-N15-R, S12-N14-R, S01-N14-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N15-D | Diagnosis of the "Finance" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N15-K, S13-N15-R, S13-N14-D, S13-N16-D, S12-N15-D, S01-N15-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N15-K | Coordination of the "Finance" node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | liquidity; resource cost; financial stability; consistency index | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N15-D, S13-N15-R, S13-N14-K, S13-N16-K, S12-N15-K, S01-N15-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N15-R | Development of the "Finance" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | liquidity; cost of resource; financial stability; growth to the baseline | accounting; budgets; treasury; banking and investment data | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N15-D, S13-N15-K, S13-N14-R, S13-N16-R, S12-N15-R, S01-N15-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N16-D | Diagnostics of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N16-K, S13-N16-R, S13-N15-D, S13-N17-D, S12-N16-D, S01-N16-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N16-K | Coordination of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | staff security; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; consistency index | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N16-D, S13-N16-R, S13-N15-K, S13-N17-K, S12-N16-K, S01-N16-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N16-R | Development of the "Personnel" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | staffing; level of competence; fluidity/continuity; increment to baseline | HRIS; competence registers; training; certifications | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N16-D, S13-N16-K, S13-N15-R, S13-N17-R, S12-N16-R, S01-N16-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N17-D | Diagnostics of the "Technology" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; base line | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N17-K, S13-N17-R, S13-N16-D, S13-N18-D, S12-N17-D, S01-N17-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N17-K | Coordination of the node "Technology" in the contour of the protective field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; consistency index | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N17-D, S13-N17-R, S13-N16-K, S13-N18-K, S12-N17-K, S01-N17-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N17-R | Development of the "Technology" node in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | technology readiness; technology efficiency; scalability; growth to the baseline | TRL/MRL; patents; tests; digital models; technical cards | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N17-D, S13-N17-K, S13-N16-R, S13-N18-R, S12-N17-R, S01-N17-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N18-D | Diagnosis of the "Wednesday" node in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | environmental quality; load on the environment; recovery potential; baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N18-K, S13-N18-R, S13-N17-D, S13-N19-D, S12-N18-D, S01-N18-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N18-K | Coordination of the node "Wednesday" in the contour of the protective field: coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; consistency index | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N18-D, S13-N18-R, S13-N17-K, S13-N19-K, S12-N18-K, S01-N18-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N18-R | Development of the node "Environment" in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | quality of the environment; load on the environment; recovery potential; increase to the baseline | environmental monitoring; GIS; meteo; biocenose observations | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N18-D, S13-N18-K, S13-N17-R, S13-N19-R, S12-N18-R, S01-N18-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
| S13-N19-D | Diagnostics of the node "Result" in the contour of the protective field: measure the current state and deviations. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T | S13-N19-K, S13-N19-R, S13-N18-D, S12-N19-D, S01-N19-D | Data coverage ≥ 90%; relevance in the given SLA; We trace the source; recalculation gives a deviation ≤ 5% |
| S13-N19-K | Coordination of the node "Result" in the contour of the protective field: to coordinate participants, restrictions and actions. | achievement of result; effect/costs; sustainability of result; consistency index | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R | S13-N19-D, S13-N19-R, S13-N18-K, S12-N19-K, S01-N19-K | ≥ 80% key actors agreed; roles and solutions fixed; critical conflicts closed; resource gap ≤ 10% |
| S13-N19-R | Development of the node "Result" in the contour of the protective field: change the state and increase the potential. | result achievement; effect/costs; result stability; increase to baseline | KPI; effects statistics; acceptance acts; impact assessment | R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V | S13-N19-D, S13-N19-K, S13-N18-R, S12-N19-R, S01-N19-R | target effect confirmed by data; improvement against base line ≥ 10% or reach an approved threshold; the effect is stable ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles |
Methodology of operation of the registry
1. Attachment to object. A set of relevant modules is selected for each project/territory/organization. A module without a designated data owner is considered not to be activated.
2. Base line. The D-modules are calculated first. Their data form the initial state and the list of deviations.
3. Harmonization. K-modules record participants, rights, decisions, resources and conflicts. Without K-validation, the transition to development is considered managerially unprepared.
4. Development. R-modules measure change against the baseline, effect stability, and reproducibility.
5. Verification. Each indicator is assigned a source, owner, update date, calculation method and level of trust. Critical indicators require independent verification.
6. NEUROSVOD. Passport connections form a hypergraph: nodes - modules, edges - dependencies of data, decisions, resources and effects. This allows you to calculate the coherence and detect field breaks.
Source materials
Originals and versions of the document
- Реестр_741_Полей_СОЮЗ-741.docxDOCX · main document
- Реестр_741_Полей_СОЮЗ-741.pptxPPTX · related version
Other editions in web format
Each version is disclosed separately; the sequence of the source document is saved.
SOYUZ-741Register_741_Other Organiser741.pptx · Web Text+
13 Family × 19 Node × 3 Status = 741 Module
Master Classifier · passport system · NEUROSVOD Union
Version 1.0 · 25 August 2026
Architecture SOYUZ-741
Strict decomposition of the number 741 into a controlled system of modules
13 families
19 knots
3 Status
Metapoles set the contour: management, meaning, time, resources, data, people, cooperation, sustainability, innovation, production, strategy, ecology, safety.
Single set of system nodes: subject → Objective → Border → resource → Signal → Knowledge → solution → Action → feedback → … → Result.
D - Diagnosis: Measure.
K - Coordination: agree.
R - Development: change and consolidate the effect.
13 × 19 × 3 = 741
Each module has a separate code and passport, but is associated with neighboring states, nodes and families.
Module Passport
Unified format makes the registry comparable and machine-readable
1. Code
2. Function
S05-N06-D
What it measures/coordinates/develops
3. Indicators
4. Data
3–4 Measurable Indicator
sources, owner, refresh rate
5. Formula
6. Contacts
Operating Index D/K/R
Neighbouring States, Nodes and Families
7. Validation
quality threshold and pass criterion
Three states of the field
Common logic of each node life cycle
D · Diagnostics
K · Coordination
R · Development
Task: to establish a baseline and deviations.
Index: D = 0,40·C + 0,35·Q + 0,25·T
C - completeness of coverage
Q - Quality/Credibility
T — relevance
Objective: To harmonize participants, constraints and resources.
Index: K = 0,40·A + 0,30·L + 0,30·R
A - Consistency
L - Connectivity
R - Resource security
The task: to change the state and consolidate the effect.
Index: R = 0,40·G + 0,30·S + 0,30·V
G - Increase
S - Sustainability
V - Reproduction
Formulas are project indexes. Their weights and thresholds are calibrated according to the empirical data of a specific application circuit.
S01 · Unity and Management
integrity, subjectivity and consistent management of · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S01-N01-D | S01-N01-K | S01-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S01-N02-D | S01-N02-K | S01-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S01-N03-D | S01-N03-K | S01-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S01-N04-D | S01-N04-K | S01-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S01-N05-D | S01-N05-K | S01-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S01-N06-D | S01-N06-K | S01-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S01-N07-D | S01-N07-K | S01-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S01-N08-D | S01-N08-K | S01-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S01-N09-D | S01-N09-K | S01-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S01-N10-D | S01-N10-K | S01-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S01-N11-D | S01-N11-K | S01-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S01-N12-D | S01-N12-K | S01-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S01-N13-D | S01-N13-K | S01-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S01-N14-D | S01-N14-K | S01-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S01-N15-D | S01-N15-K | S01-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S01-N16-D | S01-N16-K | S01-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S01-N17-D | S01-N17-K | S01-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S01-N18-D | S01-N18-K | S01-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S01-N19-D | S01-N19-K | S01-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S02 · Meaning and Values
Targeting, Values, Identity and Public Meaning · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S02-N01-D | S02-N01-K | S02-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S02-N02-D | S02-N02-K | S02-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S02-N03-D | S02-N03-K | S02-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S02-N04-D | S02-N04-K | S02-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S02-N05-D | S02-N05-K | S02-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S02-N06-D | S02-N06-K | S02-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S02-N07-D | S02-N07-K | S02-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S02-N08-D | S02-N08-K | S02-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S02-N09-D | S02-N09-K | S02-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S02-N10-D | S02-N10-K | S02-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S02-N11-D | S02-N11-K | S02-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S02-N12-D | S02-N12-K | S02-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S02-N13-D | S02-N13-K | S02-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S02-N14-D | S02-N14-K | S02-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S02-N15-D | S02-N15-K | S02-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S02-N16-D | S02-N16-K | S02-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S02-N17-D | S02-N17-K | S02-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S02-N18-D | S02-N18-K | S02-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S02-N19-D | S02-N19-K | S02-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S03 · Time and Cycles
rhythms, stages, terms, scenarios and cycles of development · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S03-N01-D | S03-N01-K | S03-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S03-N02-D | S03-N02-K | S03-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S03-N03-D | S03-N03-K | S03-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S03-N04-D | S03-N04-K | S03-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S03-N05-D | S03-N05-K | S03-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S03-N06-D | S03-N06-K | S03-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S03-N07-D | S03-N07-K | S03-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S03-N08-D | S03-N08-K | S03-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S03-N09-D | S03-N09-K | S03-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S03-N10-D | S03-N10-K | S03-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S03-N11-D | S03-N11-K | S03-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S03-N12-D | S03-N12-K | S03-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S03-N13-D | S03-N13-K | S03-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S03-N14-D | S03-N14-K | S03-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S03-N15-D | S03-N15-K | S03-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S03-N16-D | S03-N16-K | S03-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S03-N17-D | S03-N17-K | S03-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S03-N18-D | S03-N18-K | S03-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S03-N19-D | S03-N19-K | S03-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S04 · Energy and resources
resource provision, energy and material flows · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S04-N01-D | S04-N01-K | S04-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S04-N02-D | S04-N02-K | S04-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S04-N03-D | S04-N03-K | S04-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S04-N04-D | S04-N04-K | S04-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S04-N05-D | S04-N05-K | S04-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S04-N06-D | S04-N06-K | S04-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S04-N07-D | S04-N07-K | S04-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S04-N08-D | S04-N08-K | S04-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S04-N09-D | S04-N09-K | S04-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S04-N10-D | S04-N10-K | S04-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S04-N11-D | S04-N11-K | S04-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S04-N12-D | S04-N12-K | S04-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S04-N13-D | S04-N13-K | S04-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S04-N14-D | S04-N14-K | S04-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S04-N15-D | S04-N15-K | S04-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S04-N16-D | S04-N16-K | S04-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S04-N17-D | S04-N17-K | S04-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S04-N18-D | S04-N18-K | S04-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S04-N19-D | S04-N19-K | S04-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S05 · Information and data
data, knowledge, digital footprints and analytics · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S05-N01-D | S05-N01-K | S05-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S05-N02-D | S05-N02-K | S05-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S05-N03-D | S05-N03-K | S05-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S05-N04-D | S05-N04-K | S05-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S05-N05-D | S05-N05-K | S05-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S05-N06-D | S05-N06-K | S05-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S05-N07-D | S05-N07-K | S05-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S05-N08-D | S05-N08-K | S05-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S05-N09-D | S05-N09-K | S05-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S05-N10-D | S05-N10-K | S05-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S05-N11-D | S05-N11-K | S05-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S05-N12-D | S05-N12-K | S05-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S05-N13-D | S05-N13-K | S05-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S05-N14-D | S05-N14-K | S05-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S05-N15-D | S05-N15-K | S05-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S05-N16-D | S05-N16-K | S05-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S05-N17-D | S05-N17-K | S05-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S05-N18-D | S05-N18-K | S05-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S05-N19-D | S05-N19-K | S05-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S06 · Man and Consciousness
human potential, competence, perception and training · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S06-N01-D | S06-N01-K | S06-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S06-N02-D | S06-N02-K | S06-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S06-N03-D | S06-N03-K | S06-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S06-N04-D | S06-N04-K | S06-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S06-N05-D | S06-N05-K | S06-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S06-N06-D | S06-N06-K | S06-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S06-N07-D | S06-N07-K | S06-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S06-N08-D | S06-N08-K | S06-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S06-N09-D | S06-N09-K | S06-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S06-N10-D | S06-N10-K | S06-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S06-N11-D | S06-N11-K | S06-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S06-N12-D | S06-N12-K | S06-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S06-N13-D | S06-N13-K | S06-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S06-N14-D | S06-N14-K | S06-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S06-N15-D | S06-N15-K | S06-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S06-N16-D | S06-N16-K | S06-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S06-N17-D | S06-N17-K | S06-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S06-N18-D | S06-N18-K | S06-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S06-N19-D | S06-N19-K | S06-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S07 · Cooperation and Networks
Connectivity of subjects, trust, contracts and network interaction · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S07-N01-D | S07-N01-K | S07-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S07-N02-D | S07-N02-K | S07-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S07-N03-D | S07-N03-K | S07-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S07-N04-D | S07-N04-K | S07-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S07-N05-D | S07-N05-K | S07-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S07-N06-D | S07-N06-K | S07-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S07-N07-D | S07-N07-K | S07-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S07-N08-D | S07-N08-K | S07-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S07-N09-D | S07-N09-K | S07-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S07-N10-D | S07-N10-K | S07-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S07-N11-D | S07-N11-K | S07-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S07-N12-D | S07-N12-K | S07-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S07-N13-D | S07-N13-K | S07-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S07-N14-D | S07-N14-K | S07-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S07-N15-D | S07-N15-K | S07-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S07-N16-D | S07-N16-K | S07-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S07-N17-D | S07-N17-K | S07-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S07-N18-D | S07-N18-K | S07-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S07-N19-D | S07-N19-K | S07-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S08 · Balance and sustainability
Balance, stability, adaptation and recovery · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S08-N01-D | S08-N01-K | S08-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S08-N02-D | S08-N02-K | S08-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S08-N03-D | S08-N03-K | S08-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S08-N04-D | S08-N04-K | S08-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S08-N05-D | S08-N05-K | S08-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S08-N06-D | S08-N06-K | S08-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S08-N07-D | S08-N07-K | S08-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S08-N08-D | S08-N08-K | S08-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S08-N09-D | S08-N09-K | S08-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S08-N10-D | S08-N10-K | S08-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S08-N11-D | S08-N11-K | S08-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S08-N12-D | S08-N12-K | S08-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S08-N13-D | S08-N13-K | S08-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S08-N14-D | S08-N14-K | S08-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S08-N15-D | S08-N15-K | S08-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S08-N16-D | S08-N16-K | S08-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S08-N17-D | S08-N17-K | S08-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S08-N18-D | S08-N18-K | S08-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S08-N19-D | S08-N19-K | S08-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S09 · Evolution and innovation
updating, experiments, R&D and scaling · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S09-N01-D | S09-N01-K | S09-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S09-N02-D | S09-N02-K | S09-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S09-N03-D | S09-N03-K | S09-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S09-N04-D | S09-N04-K | S09-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S09-N05-D | S09-N05-K | S09-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S09-N06-D | S09-N06-K | S09-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S09-N07-D | S09-N07-K | S09-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S09-N08-D | S09-N08-K | S09-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S09-N09-D | S09-N09-K | S09-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S09-N10-D | S09-N10-K | S09-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S09-N11-D | S09-N11-K | S09-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S09-N12-D | S09-N12-K | S09-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S09-N13-D | S09-N13-K | S09-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S09-N14-D | S09-N14-K | S09-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S09-N15-D | S09-N15-K | S09-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S09-N16-D | S09-N16-K | S09-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S09-N17-D | S09-N17-K | S09-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S09-N18-D | S09-N18-K | S09-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S09-N19-D | S09-N19-K | S09-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S10 · Creation and production
value creation, production, services and infrastructure execution · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S10-N01-D | S10-N01-K | S10-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S10-N02-D | S10-N02-K | S10-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S10-N03-D | S10-N03-K | S10-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S10-N04-D | S10-N04-K | S10-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S10-N05-D | S10-N05-K | S10-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S10-N06-D | S10-N06-K | S10-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S10-N07-D | S10-N07-K | S10-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S10-N08-D | S10-N08-K | S10-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S10-N09-D | S10-N09-K | S10-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S10-N10-D | S10-N10-K | S10-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S10-N11-D | S10-N11-K | S10-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S10-N12-D | S10-N12-K | S10-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S10-N13-D | S10-N13-K | S10-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S10-N14-D | S10-N14-K | S10-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S10-N15-D | S10-N15-K | S10-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S10-N16-D | S10-N16-K | S10-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S10-N17-D | S10-N17-K | S10-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S10-N18-D | S10-N18-K | S10-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S10-N19-D | S10-N19-K | S10-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S11 · Navigation and strategy
priorities, routes, portfolios and strategic choice · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S11-N01-D | S11-N01-K | S11-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S11-N02-D | S11-N02-K | S11-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S11-N03-D | S11-N03-K | S11-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S11-N04-D | S11-N04-K | S11-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S11-N05-D | S11-N05-K | S11-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S11-N06-D | S11-N06-K | S11-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S11-N07-D | S11-N07-K | S11-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S11-N08-D | S11-N08-K | S11-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S11-N09-D | S11-N09-K | S11-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S11-N10-D | S11-N10-K | S11-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S11-N11-D | S11-N11-K | S11-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S11-N12-D | S11-N12-K | S11-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S11-N13-D | S11-N13-K | S11-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S11-N14-D | S11-N14-K | S11-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S11-N15-D | S11-N15-K | S11-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S11-N16-D | S11-N16-K | S11-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S11-N17-D | S11-N17-K | S11-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S11-N18-D | S11-N18-K | S11-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S11-N19-D | S11-N19-K | S11-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S12 · Life and Ecology
biocenoses, environment, ecosystem health and natural reproducibility · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S12-N01-D | S12-N01-K | S12-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S12-N02-D | S12-N02-K | S12-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S12-N03-D | S12-N03-K | S12-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S12-N04-D | S12-N04-K | S12-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S12-N05-D | S12-N05-K | S12-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S12-N06-D | S12-N06-K | S12-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S12-N07-D | S12-N07-K | S12-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S12-N08-D | S12-N08-K | S12-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S12-N09-D | S12-N09-K | S12-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S12-N10-D | S12-N10-K | S12-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S12-N11-D | S12-N11-K | S12-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S12-N12-D | S12-N12-K | S12-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S12-N13-D | S12-N13-K | S12-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S12-N14-D | S12-N14-K | S12-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S12-N15-D | S12-N15-K | S12-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S12-N16-D | S12-N16-K | S12-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S12-N17-D | S12-N17-K | S12-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S12-N18-D | S12-N18-K | S12-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S12-N19-D | S12-N19-K | S12-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
S13 · Security and integrity
Threats, protection, continuity and control of critical states · 57 modules
| Node | D | K | R | Key indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N01 · Subject | S13-N01-D | S13-N01-K | S13-N01-R | Role / Responsibility |
| N02 · Objective | S13-N02-D | S13-N02-K | S13-N02-R | Measurability of Purpose |
| N03 · Border | S13-N03-D | S13-N03-K | S13-N03-R | Clarity of the outline |
| N04 · Resource | S13-N04-D | S13-N04-K | S13-N04-R | security |
| N05 · Signal | S13-N05-D | S13-N05-K | S13-N05-R | Signal Reliability |
| N06 · Knowledge | S13-N06-D | S13-N06-K | S13-N06-R | Completeness of knowledge |
| N07 · Decision | S13-N07-D | S13-N07-K | S13-N07-R | Quality of solution |
| N08 · Action | S13-N08-D | S13-N08-K | S13-N08-R | effectiveness |
| N09 · Feedback | S13-N09-D | S13-N09-K | S13-N09-R | correction speed |
| N10 · Risk | S13-N10-D | S13-N10-K | S13-N10-R | residual risk |
| N11 · Trust | S13-N11-D | S13-N11-K | S13-N11-R | Confidence Index |
| N12 · Cooperation | S13-N12-D | S13-N12-K | S13-N12-R | density of connections |
| N13 · Infrastructure | S13-N13-D | S13-N13-K | S13-N13-R | reliability |
| N14 · Standard | S13-N14-D | S13-N14-K | S13-N14-R | Conformity |
| N15 · Finance | S13-N15-D | S13-N15-K | S13-N15-R | Sustainability of Finance |
| N16 · Personnel | S13-N16-D | S13-N16-K | S13-N16-R | Competences |
| N17 · Technology | S13-N17-D | S13-N17-K | S13-N17-R | availability TRL/MRL |
| N18 · Wednesday | S13-N18-D | S13-N18-K | S13-N18-R | Quality of environment |
| N19 · Result | S13-N19-D | S13-N19-K | S13-N19-R | Effect / Cost |
Validation criteria
The module is considered working only after passing the control threshold
D · Data control
K · Harmonization control
R · Effect control
• Data coverage ≥ 90%
• relevance in specified SLA
• source traceable
• Re-calculation: rejection ≤ 5%
• ≥ 80% The key stakeholders agreed
• roles and solutions fixed
• Critical conflicts closed
• Resource gap ≤ 10%
• effect confirmed by data
• improvement ≥ 10% or reach the threshold
• Sustainability ≥ 2 Measurement Cycles
• scaling reproducible
NEUROSVOD: Register as a hypergraph
Passport is not a card in the archive, but an active node of the network of dependencies
S05-N06-D
Knowledge · Diagnosis
Neighborhood Node
Related Family
Data
Effect
Procedure for implementation
From the classifier to the working control circuit
01 · Outline Selection
02 · Activation D
03 · Passing K
territory / project / organization
Data sources and baseline
owners, roles, decisions, resources
04 · Run R
05 · Hypergraph
06 · Scaling
change of state and effect control
automatic analysis of connectivity and breaks
Replication of confirmed modules
741
Result
SOYUZ-741 turns Field Theory into a verifiable system of description, management and development
Modular Passports
the Field Families
Mandatory Passport Fields
Next Level: Digital Registry + graph links + API NEUROSVOD + Linking to real data and indicator owners.
