Home / Knowledge / Social Data Atlas EQUILIBRIUM

Primary document · 24 August 2026

EQUILIBRIUM Social Data Atlas

The material describes an architecture for observing, understanding and developing society through data, connections, decisions and measurable impact.

First page of the document "Atlas of social data EQUILIBRIUM"
Source front page: Atlas_social_data_EQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx.

Brief annotation

About the document

The material describes an architecture for observing, understanding and developing society through data, connections, decisions and measurable impact.

Presentation

Атлас_социальных_данных_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_презентация.pptx

Page — from —
Width

Downloading the document...

For viewing prepared PDF-copy of the presentation. PowerPoint animations and transitions are not played.

Scroll through the pages and change the scale on the viewbar.

EQUILIBRIUM

The Social Data Atlas is a digital system that combines information about people, families, territories, organizations, infrastructure, initiatives, resources, risks and outcomes into a single verifiable model of social reality. Its task is not just to store statistics, but to give grounds for decisions: where intervention is required, what resources are already available, who is able to act, what measures give results and how the quality of life changes.

System document • 2026

1. The Atlas Mission

The mission of Atlas is to create a single language of social data and move from disparate departmental datasets to a holistic picture of society, in which not only problems but also the potential for development are visible.

  • see the social reality at the level of the country, region, municipality, territory, community and project;
  • Compare the needs of the population with the infrastructure, financing, competencies and existing programs;
  • Identify risk areas prior to a crisis;
  • measure the effectiveness of social projects and government measures;
  • to form an evidence base for NGOs, business, authorities, development institutions and citizens;
  • support the design of new social services and targeted solutions.

2. The main principle: from statistics to the system of actions

Ordinary statistics answer the question "what happened?". The Atlas should answer six questions at once: what is happening, where, with whom, why, what resources are available and what action will have the greatest effect.

LevelQuestionResult
ObservationWhat's going on now?Events, indicators, dynamics
DiagnosticsWhere is the deviation and who has a problem?Risk and Vulnerability Map
CausalityWhat factors are related to the situation?Hypotheses and causal relationships
ResourcesWho and what can influence?Map of organizations, programs, finance, infrastructure
DecisionWhich action is preferable?Scenario of intervention
EvaluationHas the state changed after the action?Measurable social impact

3. Objects of social model

The core of the Atlas is built not around one registry, but around interconnected objects. Each object receives a unique identifier, a set of attributes, sources of confirmation, territorial binding and connections with other objects.

ObjectWhat we describeKey connections
Personsocio-demographic and life parameters in an impersonal/legal contourfamily, services, education, work, territory
Family / Householdcomposition, living conditions, load, access to serviceshousing, income, support measures
Territorypopulation, environment, infrastructure, risks, eventsorganizations, projects, facilities, indicators
OrganizationNPO, institution, enterprise, foundation, communityprojects, people, resources, partnerships
Project / Programpurpose, task force, budget, activities, KPIorganizations, territories, results
Resourcefinance, premises, equipment, competences, volunteersprojects, organizations, needs
Needdeficit, problem, request, risktarget group, territory, project
Eventchange, crisis, event, appeal, interventiontime, place, participants, consequences
Resultoutput, effect, change of stateproject, indicator, territory, group

4. 19 layers of the Social Data Atlas

№LayerContents
01Demographynumber, age, migration, household structure
02Income and welfareincome, expenditure, poverty, debt burden
03Employment and workemployment, professions, vacancies, unemployment, cooperation
04Educationaccessibility, trajectories, competencies, additional education
05Health and Well-beingaccessibility of infrastructure, prevention, social determinants
06Family and childhoodfamily support, children, parenthood, family infrastructure
07The older generationactive longevity, care, employment, accessibility of the environment
08Inclusion and accessibilitybarriers, special services, accessible environment
09Housing and environmenthousing, improvement, public accessibility
10Securitysocial risks, emergency events, prevention
11Culture and identityinstitutions, participation, heritage, local communities
12Sport and activityfacilities, availability, participation, mass programs
13Civic activityNGOs, volunteering, initiatives, self-organization
14Social servicessuppliers, capacities, queues, quality, result
15Digital accessibilitycommunication, digital services, skills, digital divide
16Environment and healthEnvironmental quality and social impacts
17Social economysocial entrepreneurship, cooperation, employment, procurement
18Financing for developmentbudgets, grants, donations, investments, PPA
19Social impactoutputs, results, sustainability, change in quality of life

5. Unified Register of NGOs and Social Initiatives

To work with the NGO ecosystem, Atlas should not become a copy of the catalog of organizations, but a “living passport” of the territory’s ability to solve social problems.

  • NGO passport: legal status, directions, geography, team, competencies, experience;
  • portfolio of projects: goals, groups, budgets, calendar, results, partners;
  • Sources of funding and history of support;
  • material and intangible resources;
  • proven practices and replicable solutions;
  • needs of the NGO itself: financing, premises, personnel, IT, partners;
  • reputation and evidence profile: reporting, transparency, confirmed results.

6. Indicators: three-tier system

LevelMeaningExamples
A. StatusWhat Happens to Society and Territoryemployment, access to services, migration balance
B. ActionsWhat the system doesProgramme coverage, number of services, resources, partnerships
C. EffectWhat has changed as a result of actionincreasing independence, reducing the deficit, improving accessibility

For each indicator are fixed: definition, formula, unit of measure, source, periodicity, geography, acceptable level of data quality, owner, limitations of use and connection with development goals.

7. Map of social needs

The need should be an independent object of data, and not just the text of the appeal. This allows you to aggregate requests, compare them with the offer and automatically find deficits.

Parameter of needDescription
Typeservices, infrastructure, financing, employment, education, assistance, security, etc.
Mediatorperson, group, community, organization, territory
Geographylocation, address, municipality, region
IntensityThe extent and depth of the deficit
UrgencyNormal / High / Critical
Confirmationofficial data, appeals, survey, expert assessment
Possible solutionsexisting programmes, implementers, resources, new initiative

8. Map of resources and opportunities

Atlas should show not only "where is bad", but also "what is already there". The resource card turns social analytics into an operating system of cooperation.

  • financial resources: budgets, grants, donations, social investments, targeted programs;
  • infrastructure: premises, centers, sports and cultural facilities, transport, digital sites;
  • human capital: specialists, mentors, volunteers, experts;
  • organizational resource: NGOs, institutions, business, initiative groups;
  • technologies and data: digital services, platforms, methods, educational products;
  • Time and availability of the resource: when it is free and under what conditions it can be used.

9. Hypergraph of social connections

The basic form of Atlas presentation is the hypergraph. Nodes represent people, organizations, projects, territories, resources, needs, and indicators; connections show participation, funding, impact, service delivery, partnership, affiliation, and cause-and-effect relationships.

This approach allows you to see not separate tables, but the configuration of the social system: who is associated with whom, where overload occurs, which organizations are centers of trust, which resources are isolated and which projects are able to cover several needs at the same time.

10. Social passport of the territory

Passport BlockWhat includes
Peoplepopulation structure, groups, dynamics
Quality of lifeKey social indicators
NeedsDeficits and risks
Infrastructurefacilities and capacities
OrganizationsNPOs, institutions, businesses, communities
ProjectsCurrent and planned initiatives
Resourcesfinance, personnel, premises, technology
EventsSignificant changes and treatment
EffectProgramme results and dynamics
Forecastscenarios for 1/3/5 years

11. Analytical regimes

  • Deficit map - where the need exceeds the available resource.
  • Coverage map - which groups and territories receive services and which fall out.
  • Map of cooperation - who is already working on the topic and with whom it makes sense to unite.
  • Efficiency map - what practices give a measurable result per unit of resource.
  • Risk maps are early signs of a worsening situation.
  • Map of potential — unused assets of the territory and social capital.
  • Scenario mode - a forecast of the consequences of various management decisions.
  • Single window mode - selection of projects, programs and performers for a specific need.

12. Not as an analysis, but as a navigation

A uniform rating of territories or organizations is allowed only as the top navigation layer. Decomposing indicators and evidence should remain at the core. Otherwise, the complex social reality turns into a dispute about a singular number.

IndexPurpose
Social Welfare IndexGeneral condition of the Territory
Accessibility IndexAccess to key services and infrastructure
Social activity indexdensity of initiatives, NGOs, volunteering, participation
Resource security indexAvailability and availability of resources
Vulnerability indexA combination of risk factors
Proven Effect IndexEffectiveness of programmes and projects
Cooperation indexConnectivity of participants and cross-sectoral partnerships

13. Data and trust contour

The Atlas should distinguish between published data, departmental data, organization data, user signals, and analytical findings. It is important for each fact to maintain the origin and level of trust.

Source classExamplesMonitoring
Official registriesstate statistics, registers, open datasource ID, date of update
Organizational dataReporting by NGOs and institutionsverification, documents, responsible
Project dataactivities, budgets, KPIPrimary evidence
Messages and Signalscitizens' requests, community messagesanti-duplication, moderation, geo-binding
Researchsurveys, monitoring, expert assessmentsMethodology and sampling
Estimatesindices, forecasts, modelsversion of the formula, calculation date, explicability

14. The rules of responsible work with data

  • privacy by design: personal data should not become a public layer of the Atlas;
  • Minimization: only the data required for a specific social task is collected;
  • separation of identification, analytical and public contours;
  • access control by roles and logging actions;
  • Depersonalization and aggregation for public cards;
  • the right to correct erroneous data in cases stipulated by law;
  • transparency of calculation methods and origin of indicators;
  • banning the automatic adoption of high-value decisions only on the basis of an opaque rating.

15. Integration layer

The Atlas is designed as a supersystem, not another closed base. Its key function is to connect external registers, platforms and information systems through API and a single object dictionary.

Integration circuitFunction
State systemsofficial indicators, support measures, infrastructure
the NGO Platformorganizations, projects, practices, support requests
Grant Systemscompetitions, applications, financing, results
Municipal and regional IPlocal infrastructure, appeals, programs
SFERAinitiatives, communities, events, cooperation
ECO-PPAresource and project contours, risk prevention
SPECZASHCHITAperformers, cooperation, pilots, production circuit
EQUILIBRIUManalytics, hypergraph, prediction, scenarios and results control

16. Platform architecture

  1. Layer 1 - data sources and connectors;
  2. Layer 2 - single data model and identifiers;
  3. Layer 3 - a repository of facts and time series;
  4. Layer 4 - graph of connections and ontology;
  5. Layer 5 - quality, verification and origin of data;
  6. Layer 6 - analytics, indices and models;
  7. Layer 7 - cards, dashboards and social passports;
  8. Layer 8 - design and cooperation contour;
  9. Layer 9 - API for external services;
  10. Layer 10 - Access management, security and audit.

17. User Roles

RoleWhat Gets
Citizenpublic card, available services, projects, opportunities for participation
NPOorganization passport, territory analytics, partners, grants and needs
MunicipalitySingle social passport and deficit card
Regioncomparison of territories, programs and dynamics
Federal levelsingle monitoring, scenarios, interregional imbalances
Businesssocial investment points and partnership projects
Foundation / Development Institutethe Initiatives funnel, evidence check and effect
Researcheranonymized data, methods and time series
Operator EQUILIBRIUMcross-cutting model of connections, risks, resources and solutions

18. Minimum viable product (MVP)

The first launch should not attempt to cover the entire country and all the data. One region or group of municipalities and five interconnected registries are sufficient.

  1. Register of NGOs and social organizations;
  2. register of social projects;
  3. register of needs and problems of the territory;
  4. Register of resources and infrastructure;
  5. Register of indicators and results.

MVP should be able to: show the map; open the passport of the territory; find an organization or project; compare the need with the resource; form a project card; build a basic dashboard; upload an analytical note.

19. Pilot "Atlas of NGOs and social activity"

The practical first module can be deployed around existing NPO platforms. Instead of competing with them, Atlas receives cataloguing from them and complements it with analytics, connectivity, and result measurement.

StageResult
1. InventoryMap of platforms, registries and open data sets
2. Normalizationcommon fields of organization, project, territory and result
3. Loading the pilot500–5000 organizations of one/several territories
4. Contactstopics, partnerships, financing, projects, territories
5. RequirementsCollection of requests from NGOs and territories
6. Analyticsmap of density, gaps, specializations, resources
7. CooperationFinding partners and collecting project consortia
8. EffectSingle minimum standard for reporting results

20. 20 Atlas Key Screens

  1. 1. Main country map
  2. 2. Passport of the region
  3. 3. Passport of the municipality
  4. 4. Map of NGOs
  5. 5. NPO Card
  6. 6. Project Map
  7. 7. Project Card
  8. 8. Map of needs
  9. 9. Need card
  10. 10. Resource map
  11. 11. Resource card
  12. 12. Infrastructure map
  13. 13. Map of social risks
  14. 14. Dashboard Quality of Life
  15. 15. Dashboard Grants and Funding
  16. 16. Partnerships graph
  17. 17. The Consortium Designer
  18. 18. Scenario forecast
  19. 19. Monitoring of social impact
  20. 20. Center for Reports and Analytical Notes

21. Management cycle

Atlas becomes a work system only when data is locked into a regular management cycle.

StepAction
1Collect and update data
2Identifying a change or deficit
3Identify the target group and territory
4Identify causes and related factors
5Compare available resources and performers
6Create a project solution
7Assign Result Indicators
8Run Execution
9Measure changes
10Maintain practice and scale with proven effect

22. EQUILIBRIUM As an analytical core

In the EQUILIBRIUM architecture, the Social Data Atlas is the outline of the observed social reality. It gives the system the actual basis for hypergraphing, forecasting, and decision design. SFERA provides a space for initiatives and participation; ECO-PPA provides a mechanism for resource concentration and threat prevention; and SPECZASHCHITA provides a cooperative execution circuit. The Atlas links all four elements through a single evidence-based data model.

23. What counts as success

  • data from different sources are comparable and have a clear origin;
  • For each territory, simultaneously visible needs, resources and performers;
  • NGOs and projects can be found not only by name, but by the ability to solve a specific task;
  • the manager sees not only expenses and activities, but a change in state;
  • the project can be traced from the problem to the resource, action, result and evidence;
  • Best practices become replicable, and repeated failures become visible.
  • The system helps to make decisions faster, more accurately and with less manual reconciliation.

24. Roadmap for deployment

PhaseContentsKey result
0. Designontology, dictionary, data policy, architectureTechnical and methodological specification
1. MVP5 registers, 1 pilot territory, base mapsworking prototype
2. Pilot of NPOintegration of catalogues and project dataMap of social activity
3. Social passportindicators, needs, infrastructureUnified Territory Profile
4. Cooperationsearch for resources, partners, consortiums gatheringProject Action Outline
5. EffectResults metrics and evidencePerformance assessment
6. Forecastrisks, scenarios, early warningAnalytical Core EQUILIBRIUM
7. ScalingInterregional and Federal Integrationthe National Atlas of Social Data

25. Final formula

DATA → RELATIONS → UNDERSTANDING → SOLUTION → ACTION → MEASURABLE EFFECT

The Social Data Atlas is not another portal or another registry. It is an infrastructure of public knowledge: a single environment in which the state of society becomes observable, resources visible, initiatives comparable, results demonstrable, and development manageable.

Annex. Minimum social object card

FieldPurpose
object_idstable unique identifier
object_typeType of ontology object
nameNormalized name
descriptionBrief and informative description
geo_idterritorial binding
time_from / time_toPeriod of fact
source_idData source
evidence_idproof/primary document
confidenceLevel of trust
ownerResponsible for data
relationsConnection with other objects
metricsindicators and values
access_classAccess Class
updated_atdate of last update

Source materials

Originals and versions of the document

  • Атлас_социальных_данных_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ.docxDOCX · main document
  • Атлас_социальных_данных_ЭКВИЛИБРИУМ_презентация.pptxPPTX · related version

Other editions in web format

Each version is disclosed separately; the sequence of the source document is saved.

ATLAS SOCIAL DATA Architecture of observation, understanding and development of society EQUILIBRIUMAtlas_social_data_EQUILIBRIUM_presentation.pptx · web text

DATA → RELATIONS → UNDERSTANDING → SOLUTION → ACTION → MEASURABLE EFFECT

1. Why do we need Atlas?

From scattered statistics to a holistic social picture

• Unified language of social data for the state, NGOs, business and citizens.

• Simultaneous display of problems, resources, performers and results.

• Early identification of social risks prior to transition to crisis.

• Evidence-based assessment of social projects and government measures.

• Support for targeted solutions and design of new services.

2. Atlas answers six questions

The main transition: from the description of the past to the system of actions

What's going on?

Where?

With who?

Why not?

What resources are available?

What action will produce the result?

3. 19 layers of social reality

Atlas is not built around one base, but around interconnected layers

1. Population

2. Families

3. Health

4. Education

5. Revenues

6. Employment

7. Housing

8. Culture

9. Sport

10. Young people

11. The older generation

12. Inclusion

13. Security

14. Ecology

15. Mobility

16. NPO

17. Social projects

18. Resources

19. The social effect

4. Unified Register of NGOs and Initiatives

Not a directory of organizations, but a map of the territory’s ability to solve problems

• NPO passport: status, team, geography, competence, experience.

• Project portfolio: goals, groups, budgets, partners, results.

• Funding and support history.

• Material and intangible resources.

• Needs of the NGO itself: personnel, premises, IT, partners, financing.

• Evidence profile: transparency, reporting, confirmed effect.

5. Needs map + resource map

Social analytics becomes an operational system of cooperation

NEEDS

RESOURCES

• type of problem

• Task Force

• geography

• urgency

• scale

• Confirmation

• Finance

• infrastructure

• specialists

• NPOs and Institutions

• Technologies and Data

• availability in time

6. Hypergraph of social connections

Basic Atlas presentation form

NPO

RESOURCES

PEOPLE

PROJECT

TERRITORIES

NEEDS

INDICATORS

7. Social passport of the territory

One screen for manager, NPO, investor and analyst

State of population

Key risks

Needs

Infrastructure

NPOs and performers

Financing

Dynamics of indicators

Projects and effect

8. Analytical regimes

Atlas should show not only "what is", but also "what to do"

Deficit map

Coverage map

Map of cooperation

Performance Map

Risk map

Capacity map

Scenario mode

One Solution Window

9. Platform architecture

10 Technology Layers

1. Sources and connectors

2. Unified data model

3. The Fact Depository

4. Count and Ontology

5. Quality and Origin

6. Analytics and Models

7. Cards and Dashboards

8. Project outline

9. API external services

10. Security and audit

10. The contour of trust and responsible work with data

Atlas should be useful without becoming a system of total observation

• Privacy by design and minimization of collected data.

• Separation of identification, analytical and public contours.

• Depersonalization and aggregation for public cards.

• Role access and logging actions.

• Transparent origin of data and calculation methods.

• No high-value decisions on an opaque rating only.

11. MVP: first working circuit

One region / group of municipalities + 5 Interconnected registries

NGOs and social organizations

Social projects

Needs and challenges

Resources and infrastructure

Indicators and results

• Territory map

• NPO/project search

• Comparison of need and resource

• Project Card

• Basic Dashboard Effect

12. 20 key screens

The Atlas interface should guide the user from the map to the solution

1. Main map

2. Passport of the region

3. Passport of the municipality

4. Map of NGOs

5. NPO Card

6. Project Map

7. Project Card

8. Map of needs

9. Need card

10. Resource map

11. Infrastructure

12. Social risks

13. Quality of life

14. Grants and funding

15. Partnerships graph

16. The Consortium Designer

17. Scenario forecast

18. Effect monitoring

19. Reporting Center

20. Search for solutions

13. Roadmap for deployment

From the pilot of NGOs to the national social infrastructure

Pilot

Connectivity

Analysis

Scaling

EQUILIBRIUM

1 region / 5 registers

API + External Platforms

Risks, Deficits and Efficiency

regions and industry contours

a Single Analytical Core

Social Data Atlas = public knowledge infrastructure and navigation system to measurable social outcome.