Academic infrastructure "Revival of the Earth"

Brief annotation

About the document

Architecture of Academic Registers, Knowledge and Institutions of the “Revival of the Earth” programme.

Presentation

Возрождение_Земли_Академические_реестры.pptx

Page — from —

Width

Downloading the document...

JavaScript is required for built-in viewing. Open Document.

Prepared for Sergey Leonidovich	Working version 26 August 2026

SECTION 01

Action to be taken

To create a modern federal academic infrastructure that uses the strong system principles of the Academy of Sciences USSR without reproducing its administrative and political model.

“Rebirth of the Earth” — mission; academic institutions — execution infrastructure; academic registries — trust and management infrastructure.

Towards the end 36- a monthly cycle should operate a network of profile institutional contours and territorial nodes, combined 16 interconnected registers. For each solution, a traceable chain is maintained: source → Method → Data → Conclusion → Technology → Event → Measured effect → independent verification.

№	Decision	Contents
1	Approve Frame	It is not the legal restoration of the AN USSR, but a modern network based on its strong organizational principles.
2	Appointing owners	The Higher Academic Council, the Scientific and Methodological Council, the platform operator and the owners of domain registries.
3	Run 16 registers	Uniform identifiers, object passports, rules of evidence, versions and communications.
4	Choose a pilot	3–5 Territories, 5 priority issues, a single baseline and independent verification.
5	Consolidate the legal regime	Data, rights, access, security, conflict of interest and appeals.
6	Provide a long horizon	Separate funding of science, infrastructure and projects with public audit.

SECTION 02

Why new infrastructure is needed

Today, knowledge, equipment, projects, territories, and evidence often exist in separate circuits.

The problem is not the lack of science as such. The gap arises between the accumulated knowledge and the ability to turn it into coordinated programmes for the restoration of territories. Organizations describe themselves differently, methods are not always associated with data sets, pilots are associated with the baseline, and the claimed effect is with independent verification.

Fragmentation of institutions. Competencies and infrastructure are accounted for locally; inter-institutional search is built manually.
Evidence gap. Publication, data set, technology, pilot and confirmed effect are mixed as equivalent results.
A short project horizon. Fundamental research, observation series and operation of unique installations do not fit into the usual grant cycle.
opaque continuity. The history of institutions, collections, schools, and assets is rarely described as a chain of transformations with sources.
Difficulty scaling. Pilot success does not automatically turn into reproducible technology for another territory.

Target Chain

SECTION 03

Historical model of AN USSR

Functional reconstruction of mature architecture 1963–1991; names and composition changed over the periods.

The strength of the system lay not only in the number of institutions, but in the related contours of governance, disciplinary specialization, regional centres and common infrastructure. Charter 1963 called the Research Institute the main bodies of research activities; laboratories, stations, observatories, libraries, museums, botanical gardens, expeditions, auxiliary institutions and enterprises operated nearby. [H1]

Level	Function
State Contour	Council of Ministers USSR; prioritization and reporting of the Academy.
General Meeting	The highest body: the directions of science, elections, key organizational decisions.
Presidency	Plans, estimates, structure, specialization of institutions, coordination of councils and commissions.
Sections and offices	Disciplinary development of science and management of the relevant network of institutions.
Scientific advice	Inter-institutional and inter-agency complex problems; are not identical to research institutes.
Regional contours	Departments, research centers and branches for the tasks of macroregions.
Research Institutes and Units	Institutions, departments, laboratories, sectors and groups are direct research.

SECTION 04

Disciplinary departments and regional contours

The normative image of 1963 shows a combination of scientific-industrial and territorial principles.

Charter Section 1963	Branches
Physical, technical and mathematical sciences	Mathematics; general physics and astronomy; nuclear physics; physical and technical problems of energy; mechanics and control processes.
Chemical-technological and biological sciences	General and technical chemistry; physico-chemistry and technology of inorganic materials; biochemistry, biophysics and chemistry of physiologically active compounds; physiology; general biology.
Earth Sciences	Geology, geophysics and geochemistry; oceanology, atmospheric physics and geography.
Social sciences	History; philosophy and law; economics; literature and language.

Territorial Logic

Contour	Value
Central centres	Moscow - Presidium and a significant part of the institutions; Leningrad is a large complex of institutes, library and archival institutions. The Leningrad Scientific Center was established in 1983.
Siberian Branch	It was founded in 1957. Principles: comprehensiveness of research, practical implementation, training. Novosibirsk Akademgorodok is the core of a wide regional network. [H4]
Ural Branch	Branch with 1932 years → the Scientific Center 1971 years → the Department of 1987 years. Linking fundamental science, resources, industry and regional challenges. [H]5]
Far Eastern Branch	Branch in SB AN USSR → the Scientific Center 1970 years → the Department of 1987 years. Ocean, bioresources, geology, seismicity and macroregion development. [H]6]
Specialized centres	Pushchino, Chernogolovka, Troitsk: territorial clusters of independent institutions and common infrastructure.

SECTION 05

Common infrastructure of mature academic system

The long scientific cycle was supported not only by institutions, but also by common facilities, services and personnel.

Contour	Composition
Experimental	Unique installations, observatories, polygons, stations, stationary, fleet, expeditions, collections.
Computational	Computing centers and machine complexes for modeling, algorithms and collective access.
Engineering and Innovation	SKB, design and technological institutes, experimental plants and experimental production.
Information and memory	Libraries, archives, museums, collections, catalogues, reference and bibliographic systems.
Publishing House	Editorial and publishing board, magazines, publishing house "Science", printing houses, distribution.
Personnel and educational	Postgraduate studies, basic departments, universities, specialized schools and scientific seminars.
Territorial-household	Academgorodok, housing, medicine, transport and economic services - providing the contour.

Functional Heritage Formula

the Scientific School → fundamental research → experimental base → design development → Experienced sample → implementation → new research tasks

SECTION 06

What to preserve, modernize and not reproduce

Historical heritage is used as a set of verifiable organizational principles, not as a ready-made administrative form.

Mode	Decision
Save	Long horizon; scientific schools; fundamental research; interdisciplinary programs; regional bases; general installations; libraries and archives; science, engineering and education links.
Modernize	Federated network instead of a single departmental outline; open metadata standards; independent expertise; digital traceability; transparent funding; international interoperability.
Do not reproduce	Administrative monopoly; political dependence of scientific evaluation; closed assignments; non-transparent allocation of resources; formal KPI; prohibition of scientific disagreement.

SECTION 07

The Doctrine of Earth Revival

The object of management is not a separate industry, but the state of natural and anthropogenic systems of the territory.

The mission of the program is to create scientifically based, verifiable and scalable solutions for the restoration of natural systems, the sustainability of infrastructure and the quality of life. Each goal is translated into the observed indicators of the state of the atmosphere, waters, soils, biodiversity, environmental health, resource efficiency and man-made risks.

Principle	Practical rule
Systematicity	The decision is evaluated on a full set of interrelated implications, including the transfer of risk between environments and territories.
Evidence	Source, method, data, uncertainty and independent verification are recorded together with the conclusion.
Territoriality	Programs start with a territory passport and a baseline, not pre-selected technology.
Reproducibility	The pilot becomes the basis for scaling only after describing the conditions of applicability and re-checking.
Openness by default	Metadata and results are as open as law, security and ethics allow.
Scientific freedom	The Register retains competing hypotheses and status of the dispute; the administrative status does not declare scientific truth.

SECTION 08

Target architecture

Three levels link institutions, programs, and evidence.

Level	Function
I. Institutional level	Profile institutional contours, scientific schools, departments, territorial centers, laboratories, CSP, collections and personnel programs.
II. Programme level	Mission programs, projects, consortia, polygons, agreements, resources, timelines, risks and outcome indicators.
III. Register level	16 academic registers, a single core of identifiers, classifiers, passports, evidence, versions, and access.

The Federal Principle

Institutions retain responsibility for primary data and domain expertise.
A single academic core specifies identifiers, classifiers, and trust procedures.
Metadata is indexed centrally; private or big data can remain with the owner.
The platform operator provides accessibility and integration, but does not change the scientific conclusions.

SECTION 09

Institute infrastructure: 19 contours

These are project competency profiles. They can be designed as new institutions, network centers or inter-institutional programs after a separate decision.

Cluster	Institutional contours
A. Earth System	01 Earth systems and geodynamics; 02 atmosphere and climate; 03 hydrosphere and water resources; 04 soil and land use; 05 biodiversity and biogeocenoses.
B. Ecosystems and health	06 Forests and landscapes; 07 Oceans and cryospheres; 08 Human ecology and public health; 09 Agrobiotechnologies and food.
C. Environmental technologies	10 Energy; 11 materials and chemical technologies; 12 cities, construction and infrastructure; 13 Transport and Logistics; 14 Robotics and Aerospace Monitoring.
D. Digital management	15 Mathematics, AI and digital twins; 16 Economics and Management; 17 Law, Standards and Security.
E. Civilization and continuity	18 education, culture and civilization studies; 19 heritage, archives and knowledge management.

Obligatory common platforms

a collective use center and metrological service;
unified library-archival and publishing infrastructure;
computing center, data storage and geoinformation circuit;
engineering and design and experimental production base;
academic postgraduate studies, basic departments and school of scientific leaders;
field service, stations, expeditions and long-term monitoring.

SECTION 10

Missionary programs

The institutional contours are unified around the measurable problem of territory, not just discipline.

Code	Programme	Focus
MP-01	Water and swimming pools	Water quality, hydrological regime, sources of pollution, water supply, restoration of rivers and swamps.
MP-02	Soils and productive landscapes	Degradation, erosion, fertility, carbon storage, reclamation and sustainable land use.
MP-03	Biodiversity and ecosystem connectivity	Inventory, protection of key territories, restoration of populations and ecological corridors.
MP-04	Climatic adaptation	Extreme events, forest fires, permafrost, coastal risks, sustainability of cities and infrastructure.
MP-05	Industrial areas and cities	Accumulated damage, waste, air, water, materials, energy efficiency and safe conversion.
MP-06	Environment health and food sustainability	Environmental health, food safety, agroecosystems and risk prevention.

SECTION 11

Academic registers: 16 domains

Not an archive of lists, but a linked infrastructure of identity, origin, and evidence.

Code	Register	Substantive content
AR-01	Organizations and units	Academy, branches, centers, institutes, laboratories, stations, branches; legal status, profile and powers.
AR-02	Researchers and collectives	Competences, qualifications, scientific schools, project and expert role, conflicts of interest.
AR-03	Councils, schools and consortia	Councils, commissions, interdisciplinary platforms and project consortia.
AR-04	Programs and projects	Problem, hypotheses, performers, stages, dependencies, results, timing, and status.
AR-05	Infrastructure and equipment	Laboratories, installations, ranges, ships, stations, CSPs, calibration and availability.
AR-06	Funding and commitments	Sources of funds, limits, contracts, deposits, co-financing and performance control.
AR-07	Methods and standards	Measurement methods, protocols, quality standards, dictionaries, ontologies, versions and applicability.
AR-08	Collections and samples	Biological, genetic, geological, soil and other collections; origin and preservation.

SECTION 11 • CONTINUATION

Registers of scientific knowledge and practical action

Code	Register	Substantive content
AR-09	Territories and ecosystems	Boundaries, system type, initial state, mode of use, loads and responsible.
AR-10	Monitoring and Measurements	Observation points, sensors, series, periodicity, calibration, quality, omissions and uncertainty.
AR-11	Data, models and software	Sources, structure, versions, licenses, inputs and outputs, limitations and validation.
AR-12	Publications and archives	Articles, reports, dissertations, maps, field journals, archival sources and peer review.
AR-13	Technology and Pilots	Scientific basis, developer, readiness, testing, safety and scaling.
AR-14	Rights, Licenses and Access	Patents, programs, databases, know-how, rights holders and mode of use.
AR-15	Risks, scenarios and recommendations	Risk sources, horizon, probability, uncertainty, scenarios and recommendation status.
AR-16	Activities and Confirmed Effects	Source line, target, territory, resources, event, indicators, result and independent verification.

SECTION 12

Unified object passport and link graph

Each record receives a permanent identifier, origin, version, and verifiable relationship with other objects.

Block	Mandatory content
1. Identification	Code, type, official and short name, synonyms, classifiers.
2. Responsibility	Record holder, primary data custodian, supervisor, update operator, expert and reviewer.
3. Scientific content	Problem, subject, purpose, hypothesis, discipline, applicability, and limitations.
4. Space and Time	Territory, coordinates, scale, period, dates of creation and rechecking.
5. Methodology	Methodology and version, equipment, conditions, units, calibration and quality control.
6. Origin	Primary source, authorship, data, checksums, conversions, peer review and reproducibility.
7. Quality	Completeness, accuracy, error, omissions, assumptions, and uncertainty.
8. Contacts	Organizations, people, projects, territories, observations, data, publications, technologies, risks and indicators.
9. Law and Ethics	Copyright holder, license, access, personal and sensitive data, security.
10. Status and version	Record status, change grounds, previous version, replacement, signature and date.

Compatibility of identifiers

ORCID - for the stable identification of researchers and the connection with their contribution. [D2]
ROR - for the open identification of research organizations. [D3]
DOI/DataCite — for publications, datasets, models and other research results. [D4]
An internal academic identifier does not replace external identifiers, but links them together in a single graph.

SECTION 13

Evidence, status and life cycle

The register records the quality of the procedure and the origin of the information, but does not declare the scientific truth an administrative decision.

Parameter	Question to be checked
Origin	Is the author, source and custodian of the primary materials known?
Method	Are the methods, version, equipment and conditions for obtaining the result determined?
Quality	Are completeness, error, uncertainty and control indicated?
Verification	Was there an internal, external, or reproducible test?
Relevance	Does the date, territory and scope of the claimed scope correspond?

Recording Life Cycle

Project → Presented → Technically verified → Expertly considered → Ongoing → Requires updating → replaced → Archival

Additional statuses: challenged, restricted in use, withdrawn.
The fix creates a new version; history and reasons for the change persist.
The author of the result can not be its only examiner.
The recipient of the financing does not confirm the final social or environmental effect alone.
Principles FAIR apply to metadata and data: findability, availability, compatibility, and reuse. [D1]

SECTION 14

System Management

Separation of scientific, regulatory, technical, operational and verification responsibilities.

Participant	Credentials
the Higher Academic Council	Defines missions and scientific priorities; approves interdisciplinary programs.
Scientific and Methodological Council	Approves standards of evidence, classifiers, methods and rules of examination.
the Board of Registry Owners	Manage domains, data requirements and update procedures.
Platform Operator	Provides operation, integration, availability, protection, journaling and reservation.
Institutions and regional nodes	Create, store and update primary information; bear scientific responsibility.
Data Curators	Control the completeness, quality of metadata and timing of updating.
Independent experts	Check methods, results and claimed effects; independent of the project executor.
Ethics and Security Committee	Defines sensitive, personal, genetic and dual-use data.
Audit of registers	Verifies authority, compliance with procedures and the immutability of the history of records.

SECTION 15

Roles in the project ecosystem

Integrations are described as the proposed distribution of functions; legal powers are fixed by separate documents.

Contour	Proposed function
Academic Registers	Canonical identification, origin, techniques, expert statuses and evidence.
EQUILIBRIUM	Semantic integration, graph connections, monitoring, analytics, projections, and digital twins; the model is separate from the fact.
SFERA	Open and partner portal, initiatives, competitions, communication and knowledge dissemination.
ECO-PPA	Outline of software agreements: baseline, target, commitments, resources, indicators, report and verification.
SPECZASHCHITA	Pilot performance, production cooperation, organization of tests and transfer of actual data.

SECTION 16

Data, rights, ethics and security

Openness should be combined with protected access modes and responsibility for primary information.

Mode	Application
Open	Public metadata, publications, general indicators, open datasets and methodologies.
Academically Limited	The data is available to verified researchers on terms of use and citation.
Service	Materials of current examination, design and internal management.
Confidential	Commercial secrecy, personal data, contractual restrictions and sensitive technologies.
Special	Genetic data, dual-use data, biosecurity and other regimes by law.

Right. For data, methods, software and technologies, the author, copyright holder, license and permissible use are fixed.
Origin. Files have checksums, versions, timestamps, and conversion logs.
Ethics. Consent, minimization of personal data, protection of vulnerable groups and work with biomaterials are regulated.
Security. Access is built on roles and attributes; critical operations are signed and logged.
Appeal. The author or organization may challenge the expert status; the dispute is maintained as a separate object with evidence of the parties.

SECTION 17

Financial model

Different types of activities require different funding horizons and rules.

Contour	Purpose
Basic institutional	Scientific schools, core staff, archives, collections, long series of observations and basic laboratories.
Infrastructure	Unique installations, CPU, calculations, expeditions, stations, repair and life cycle of equipment.
Competitive software	Mission Studies and Inter-Institutional Programs with Independent Expertise.
Project agreement	Pilots and implementation through ECO-PPA: objectives, baseline, commitments, resources, performance and verification.
Co-financing	Regions, companies, foundations and philanthropists - in case of a transparent conflict of interest and the publication of conditions.
Commercialization	Licenses, services, devices and technologies; revenue does not substitute for scientific evaluation and does not close the mandatory metadata.

SECTION 18

Pilot launch

The pilot checks not only the software, but also the institutional rules of trust.

Step	Result
1. Territories	Choose 3–5 territories of different types: urban agglomeration, industrial hub, river basin, agricultural and natural landscape.
2. Reference line	Agree on the territory passport, key indicators, data sources, quality and observation period.
3. Inventory	Describe institutions, experts, laboratories, facilities, data, methods, and existing projects.
4. Challenges	Approve 3–5 priority problems with hypotheses, risks and verifiable goals.
5. Registry Core	Start AR-01, 02, 04, 07, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 16 as a minimum sufficient set.
6. Consortiums	Form inter-institutional teams, data owners and independent reviewers.
7. Public result	Open maps of territories, methods, project progress, indicators and verification reports.

Pilot exit in 12 months

approved regulations and passport records;
A working metadata directory and link graph;
the first 10 registers with responsible owners;
portfolio of mission projects in pilot territories;
at least two completed independent verification cycles;
public report on data quality, duplicates, gaps and scaling solutions.

SECTION 19

Road map for 36 months

Scaling follows the rule check, not precedes it.

Timeframe	Stage	Result
0–3 months	Normative design	Concept, advice and operator; provisions; ontology; identifiers; passport; evidence; pilot criteria.
4–6 months	Inventory and prototype	Historical and modern organizations; data owners; classifiers; prototype cards and integrations.
7–12 months	MVP and pilot territories	The first 10 registers; consortia; baseline; observations; projects; independent verification; public portal.
13–24 months	Technological contour	All 16 Registers; CCP; rights; financing; models; ECO-PPA; SPECZASHCHITA; repeated measurements.
25–36 months	Scaling	New institutions and regions; regulatory consolidation; international interoperability; sustainable financing; audit.

SECTION 20

Outcome indicators

KPI measure the quality of the scientific and management contour, and not the formal completeness of the base.

Area of work	Indicator
Traceability	≥ 90% active records have source, owner, method/base and version history.
Identification	≥ 95% organizations, people and results are associated with sustainable external or internal identifiers.
Relevance	≥ 85% records are updated within the domain deadline; delays are visible publicly or to the auditor.
Independent verification	100% declared end effects have an external inspection and proof package.
Reuse	Increasing number of projects reusing data, methods and infrastructure of other institutions.
Inter-institutional connectivity	The share of programs with the participation of ≥ 3 independent institutional contours and territorial unit.
Infrastructure	CPU loading, open access share time, standby time and operation cost.
Scaling	The number of solutions reproduced in the second territory with a confirmed effect.
Workforce	Trained researchers, data engineers, curators and independent verifiers.

SECTION 21

Risks and controls

The key threats are at the intersection of science, management, data and financing.

Risk	Level	Control measure
Politicization of scientific assessment	High	Independent councils, publication of minority opinions, appeal, separation of scientific and administrative roles.
Bureaucratization	High	Minimum passport, automatic inheritance of metadata, measurement of time to maintain and remove unclaimed fields.
Duplication of systems	Medium	Integration audit, ROR/ORCID/DOI, metadata directory instead of copying all data.
Closed Expert Circle	High	Rotation, open criteria, conflict of interest, external reviewers and publication of decision statistics.
Formal KPI	High	Focus on reuse, reproducibility, and confirmed effect rather than number of records.
Disputes about IP	Medium	Rights and licenses prior to the start of the project; model agreements; separate register AR-14.
Sensitive data	High	Access classification, minimization, audit, protected computing and ethical expertise.
Unstable funding	High	Multi-year commitments to basic infrastructure and separate project accounting.

SECTION 22

Launch Solutions

Proposed package of the first management meeting.

№	Draft decision
01	Approve the concept and the legal reservation of the inheritance without a declaration of succession.
02	Approve the principles: federality, evidence, scientific freedom, versions, independent verification and openness by default.
03	To form the Higher Academic and Scientific-Methodological Councils; to approve the rules of conflict of interest.
04	To appoint the operator and owners of 16 domain registries; to fix the operator’s non-interference in scientific conclusions.
05	Approve classifiers of the first level, a single passport of the object and the model of evidence.
06	Select pilot territories, institutes and independent verifiers; appoint the owners of the baseline.
07	Approve the budget for 12 months, security audit, data rights and public reporting.
08	Assign a control point through 6 months and scaling decision through 12 months.

Result

The task of the project is not to collect another database and not to reproduce the historical vertical. The task is to restore the coherence of science: from school and institute to territory, technology and testable effect.

SECTION 23

Annex A. Types of historical register entities

The historical layer requires a particularly strict distinction of organizational forms.

Type	Definition for registry
Institute	Permanent Scientific Organization.
Scientific Center	A territorial or problem complex of several organizations.
Office	Management body on disciplinary or territorial principle.
Branch	A territorial subdivision or historical association of institutions; meaning depends on the period.
Scientific Council	Coordinating body without a mandatory own research base.
Commission	Permanent or temporary expert body.
Expedition	A temporary research program or organizational unit.
Station / Observatory	Scientific object or specialized institution; type is fixed separately.
Design Bureau	Engineering development and preparation of implementation.
Experienced factory	Production and verification of prototypes.
Archive / Library	Storage, description and provision of scientific heritage.

SECTION 24

Annex B. Sources and standards

Historical facts are based on primary and official materials; the digital model is based on open international principles of identification and data.

[H1] Statute of the Academy of Sciences USSR 1963 — digitized primary text
https://opentextnn.ru/old/history/historiografy/institut/ran/index.html%40id%3D3878

[H2] RAS: the history of the Academy in the Soviet period
https://www.ras.ru/about/history/sovietcountry.aspx

[H3] RAS: Official Status and Succession
https://www.ras.ru/about.aspx

[H4] SB RAS: history and education decree
https://web.sbras.ru/ru/cmn/general

[H5] UrO RAS: historical background
https://uran.ru/about/hist

[H6] DVO RAS: official history
https://new.ras.ru/structures/regionalnye-otdeleniya-ran/dalnevostochnoe-otdelenie-ran/

[H7] Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences: history of the institution
https://www.arran.ru/node/3

[H8] BEN RAS: the history of the academic library network
https://www.benran.ru/about-library/library-history/

[D1] GO FAIR: FAIR Principles
https://www.gofair.us/fair-principles

[D2] ORCID: Persistent Investigator Identifiers
https://info.orcid.org/what-is-orcid/

[D3] ROR: open identifiers of research organizations
https://ror.org/about/

[D4] DataCite: persistent research results identifiers
https://datacite.org/

Source materials

Originals and versions of the document

Академическая_инфраструктура_Возрождение_Земли.docxDOCX · main document
Download
Возрождение_Земли_Академические_реестры.pptxPPTX · related version
View Download

Other editions in web format

Each version is disclosed separately; the sequence of the source document is saved.

Revival of the EarthRebirth_Earth_Academic_Registries.pptx · web text

Institutional infrastructure and academic registers

Mission → Institutes → Program → Evidence → Confirmed Effect

Heritage as a source of principles,

and not the legal restoration of the USSR Academy of Sciences

Knowledge does not yet form the contour of action

PROJECT HYPOTHESIS

The gap arises not only because of a lack of research, but between knowledge, decision and result.

Institutions

Methods and data

Competencies and equipment are described locally

Difficult to compare origin and quality

Request for territory

Effect

It rarely becomes an inter-institutional program.

not always associated with the baseline and verification

Objective: Objective → Knowledge → solution → measurable effect → independent verification

What worked in the academic model USSR

HISTORICAL FACTS

The strong point was the connected infrastructure, not a separate organization.

General Meeting

and Bureau

STRATEGY

Sections, offices

and scientific advice

SCIENCE

Regional offices

and research centres

TERRITORIES

Institutes, laboratories,

Stations and Expeditions

EXECUTION

Installations, calculations,

libraries, archives, personnel

GENERAL BASE

Structure and names changed by periods - the registry stores dates and conversions

Preserve principles — change the model

DRAFT RECOMMENDATION

HERITAGE

NEW ENVIRONMENT

PROTECTORS

Save

Modernize

Do not reproduce

• scientific schools

• long horizon

• interdisciplinary

• territorial bases

• General installations

• federated network

• open identifiers

• compatible data

• independent examination

• transparent financing

• administrative monopoly

• politicization of evaluation

• closed appointments

• opacity of resources

• formal KPI

The modern system borrows connectivity — and introduces verifiable rules of trust.

Mission "Rebirth of the Earth"

PROJECT OFFER

Combine scientific activities around measurable restoration of life systems.

Natural systems

Sustainability of Territories

land, water, forests, biodiversity

Climate and technological risks

Health and safety

Proven Scaling

Environmental quality and food sustainability

decisions are postponed only after re-checking

Architecture of three levels

PROJECT OFFER

Institutions create knowledge, programs turn it into action, and registries provide trust.

INSTITUTES

Personnel • Research • Laboratories • Schools • Standards

PROGRAMMES

Tasks • consortia • polygons • resources • implementation

III

REGISTERS

IDs • Communications • evidence • Version • Access

Integrations: EQUILIBRIUM • SFERA • ECO-PPA • SPECZASHCHITA

Network of institutes: 19 functional contours

PROJECT OFFER

geodynamics • climate • water • soil • biodiversity

Earth System

Forests • Ocean • Health • Food

Ecosystems and health

Not necessarily 19 new legal entities is a network of competencies, centers and programs.

energy • materials • cities • transport • monitoring

Environmental technologies

Mathematics • AI • economy • Law • Security

Digital management

The shape of each contour is approved separately.

Education • Culture • Archives • Knowledge Management

Continuity

Common base: CCC • calculations • Archives • Engineering • Personnel • Field Networks

Academic Registers - Trust Infrastructure

PROJECT OFFER

16 domain registries work as a single knowledge graph, not as a set of tables.

AR-01—04

AR-05—08

Institutions

Resources and rules

organizations • researchers • tips • programs

Equipment • financing • methods • Collections

AR-09—12

AR-13—16

Scientific knowledge

Practical Action

Territory • monitoring • data • publications

Technology • Law • Risks • Confirmed effect

Unified digital passport of the object

PROJECT OFFER

Each object receives a verifiable, linked, and versioned history.

LINKS

• projects • territories

IDENTITY

PROOF

ID • type • status

source • method • data

PASSPORT

OBJECT

RESPONSIBILITY

RIGHTS AND RISKS

Owner • Keeper

Access • License • Ethics

VERSION

history • signature • substitution

ORCID • ROR • DOI/DataCite + Internal Academic ID

From the problem of territory to a scalable solution

PROJECT PROCESS

The register links the initial state, the scientific task, the pilot and the proven result.

Profile

Challenge

Consortium

Pilot

Validation

Status

and restrictions

Objective

and measurement

Competences

and resources

Protocol

and control

effect

and scale

Scaling is allowed only after independent verification and description of the conditions of applicability.

Managing without conflict of roles

PROJECT OFFER

Strategy, execution, data and independent verification are separated.

Academic Council

Priorities and Scientific Integrity

KEY RULE

Registry owners

semantics, quality and actualization

The operator does not change the scientific conclusion

Program Office

portfolio, contracts and stage control

It provides identifiers, availability, protection, and version log.

The effect is confirmed by the independent side.

Independent Panels

Validation, appeals and conflict of interest

Territorial Councils

request, polygons and implementation

Pilot for 12 months

PROJECT OFFER

3–5 Territories

Different natural and economic conditions

Single reference line

Passports, indicators, sources and quality

months to prove the working capacity of the mechanism - not to create a big bureaucracy

5 priority calls

Hypotheses and measurable goals

MVP 10

Owners, protocols and link graph

Independent verification

public opinion and decision on the scale of

Output: Metadata directory • 10 Registries • Consortiums • Public Quality Report

Road map for 36 months

PROJECT OFFER

Scaling begins only after quality control points.

7–12

13–24

25–36

CONCEPT

PROTOTIP

MVP

Fields

MASSHTAB

Advice • operator • ontology

Regulations • passport • pilots

10 Registries • Consortiums

Tests • Integration • Audit

standards • regions • stability

Checkpoint 12 Months: Data Owners + Update + independent examination + Re-use

Launch decision

PROPOSED SOLUTIONS

Design and piloting are now required.

Approve the concept and basic principles

PACKAGE OF THE FIRST MEETING

RECONSTRUCTION

RELATIONSHIP

SCIENCE

Appointing an Employer and Academic Council

Define operator 16 academic registers

Approve passport, classifiers and data policy

the School and Institute

to the territory, technology

and testable effect

Select a pilot budget and independent audit

Sergey Leonidovich • working version • 26.08.2026

Sources indicated in the presentation 12

OpenAI ImageGen, generated for this deck, 2026-08-26.
Project synthesis prepared for this deck, 2026.
[/Sources]
The Charter of the Academy of Sciences USSR 1963 years: https://opentextnn.ru/old/history/historiografy/institut/ran/index.html%40id%3D3878
RAS, history of the Academy in the Soviet period: https://www.ras.ru/about/history/sovietcountry.aspx
SB RAS, official historical reference: https://web.sbras.ru/ru/cmn/general
BEN RAS, history of the academic library network: https://www.benran.ru/about-library/library-history/
GO FAIR, FAIR Principles: https://www.gofair.us/fair-principles
Archive RAS: https://db.isaran.ru/
ORCID: https://info.orcid.org/what-is-orcid/
ROR: https://ror.org/about/
DataCite: https://datacite.org/

About the document

Action to be taken

Why new infrastructure is needed

Target Chain

Historical model of AN USSR

Disciplinary departments and regional contours

Territorial Logic

Common infrastructure of mature academic system

Functional Heritage Formula

What to preserve, modernize and not reproduce

The Doctrine of Earth Revival

Target architecture

The Federal Principle

Institute infrastructure: 19 contours

Obligatory common platforms

Missionary programs

Academic registers: 16 domains

Registers of scientific knowledge and practical action

Unified object passport and link graph

Compatibility of identifiers

Evidence, status and life cycle

Recording Life Cycle

System Management

Roles in the project ecosystem

Data, rights, ethics and security

Financial model

Pilot launch

Pilot exit in 12 months

Road map for 36 months

Outcome indicators

Risks and controls

Launch Solutions

Result

Annex A. Types of historical register entities

Annex B. Sources and standards

Originals and versions of the document

Other editions in web format

Knowledge does not yet form the contour of action

What worked in the academic model USSR

Preserve principles — change the model

Mission "Rebirth of the Earth"

Architecture of three levels

Network of institutes: 19 functional contours

Academic Registers - Trust Infrastructure

Unified digital passport of the object

From the problem of territory to a scalable solution

Managing without conflict of roles

Pilot for 12 months

Road map for 36 months

Launch decision

Materials on the topic