Balances of China and the USA 1896–2026

Brief annotation

About the document

Comparison of long-term balances of China and the United States in the EQUILIBRIUM synchronisation model.

Presentation

Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_Equilibrium_Sinhronizatsiya.pptx

Page — from —

Width

Downloading the document...

Russia as a Third Circuit • EQUILIBRIUM • Meanings • Benefits of Synchronization

— Historical analysis by era and scenario calculation 2026–2035 —

27 August 2026

Prepared for Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

The actual horizon ends predominantly at 2025; 2026 is the cut-off date. All future effects are labeled as scenarios, not predictions.

Summary for decisions

$52,83 trillion Nominal GDP of three countries 44,6% World Peace, 2025	≈51% World military expenditures 2025	≈49% Territorial Emissions CO₂ 2024	$0,6–1,0 trillion Central Annual Dividend Scenario

	The full integration of the three powers is unrealistic and undesirable. The modular synchronization of measurable public goods is realistic: strategic stability, climate and methane, pandemics, fundamental science, civil nuclear energy, compatible technical standards and emergency logistics.

China for 130 The country has moved from the disintegration of monetary and territorial ties to the largest production and electrical system in the world; its new deficit is demographics, domestic demand, housing and feedback.
The United States has created the strongest link between federal science, entrepreneurship, capital, standards and allied networks; their weak point is debt, uneven infrastructure and the separation of financial and technological flows from social reproduction.
Russia adds resource depth, nuclear-space and heavy engineering competencies, geographical stability; limitation is the weak transformation of strategic reserves into diversified civilian flows.
The basic structural scenario ≈$1,00 trillion Net Annual Use 2035 the Year After 20%- his deduction of overlaps and ≈$4,49 trillion NPV the National Park 2026–2035. Conservative independent scrutiny ≈$0,60 trillion per year and ≈$4,02 trillion NPV.
Nuclear, climate, epidemiological and technological tail risk are not monetized. Therefore, the monetary model is deliberately incomplete and rather underestimates the social value of safe coordination.

How to read EQUILIBRIUM

EQUILIBRIUM - not equality of forces and not the absence of conflict. It is the ability of the system to reproduce itself without destroying its own reserves, legitimacy and environment.

Axis	What we measure	Typical gap
Reserves	Natural, productive, infrastructural, human, scientific, financial and institutional capital.	Resources do not become wealth.
Streams	Income, trade, investment, energy, productivity, diffusion of technology.	Rapid growth creates debt and critical dependencies.
Reproduction	Demography, health, education, R & D, depreciation, natural capital.	The current flow consumes the future.
Resilience	Diversification, reserves, food, energy, recovery time.	Efficiency normally turns into fragility in shock.
Legality	Trust, predictable rules, benefit sharing, feedback.	Coercion and one-off transactions replace sustained consent.
External effects	Emissions, depletion, future commitments, cross-border and military risks.	The benefits inside create more damage outside or in the future.

Author's analytical framework; indicators are normalized relative to a safe corridor.

The Index Formula

E = 100 × ∏(sᵢ / 100)ʷⁱ. Geometric mean deliberately makes a weak measurement significant: high GDP cannot fully compensate for demographic failure or strategic instability.

	DYNAMIC CONDITION Reproduction + stock gain ≥ depreciation + damage + accumulated risk.

Methods and limits of comparison

1896 is the beginning of the horizon, but the first hard points often refer to 1900, 1910 or 1913 years.
Until 1950, Chinese GDP was an academic reconstruction of Maddison Project Database 2023 rather than official statistics. International dollars 2011 should not be mixed with current dollars.
Mainland China, the Republic of China, the occupied territories, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan have different coverage in sources. The tables show the nearest comparable points.
For the United States, federal debt, gross government debt, public debt, and non-financial corporations are different perimeters; they are not summed up mechanically.
2026 is the date of the publication cut. The last complete annual fact in most series is 2025; the forecast IMF on 2026 is not used as an observation.
Scenario calculation of synchronization is a transparent model of the range, not a forecast, not an estimate of budget income and not a recommendation of a political union.

	Early figures are rounded; alternative reconstructions can change the sign of a short-term trend. Therefore, the key object of analysis is the order of magnitude, the balance mechanism and the direction of change, not the tenths of a percent.

China: map of 130-year transition

Period	Mechanism	Balance sheet
1896–1911	Late Qing: Modernization without Sovereign Control	Stocks of knowledge and infrastructure arose, but external dependence and low fiscal capacity did not allow them to turn into mass income.
1912–1927	Republic: faster than the state networks	Market flows accelerated, but the central state did not provide a single money, security and infrastructure standard.
1928–1936	Nanjing Decade: Short State Assembly	Investment and monetization accelerated, but the budget did not exceed about 8,8% GDP, and assets were concentrated on the coast.
1937–1949	War and hyperinflation: the destruction of capital and trust	The issue replaced the budget, the relocation replaced reproduction, and the military logic replaced investment.
1949–1957	Recovery and the Five-Year Plan	Production and human reserves were rapidly recovering; agriculture and consumption remained subservient to heavy industry.
1958–1962	Big jump: goal without feedback	Poor data validation and suppressed feedback have made planned acceleration a source of systemic damage.
1963–1965	Correction: V-shaped recovery	Proportions and incentives restored the flow without changing the political regime.
1966–1978	Fortress balance and strategic capacities	Autonomy and heavy infrastructure increased; services, labor mobility, and critical scientific environments lagged behind.
1978–1991	Reforms: Release of Hidden Productivity	The main resource is not new capital, but the removal of administrative blockages from labor, agricultural surplus and local initiative.
1992–2001	Institutional assembly before the WTO	Market institutions and infrastructure have prepared an export push; the price is layoffs, the regional gap and weak social protection.
2001–2008	WTO and Export-Investment Supercycle	The surpluses increased the external buffer, but low consumption and emissions carried some of the costs into the future and beyond the balance sheet.
2009–2019	Credit, infrastructure and digital platforms	Infrastructure has become a real asset; local debt and real estate a deferred liability.
2020–2026	Technological Maximum and Reproduction Deficit	Manufacturing and technology stock is record; bottlenecks are population, domestic demand, housing, debt, and household confidence.

Periodization is authorial; actual supports are given on subsequent pages.

Source: World Bank WDI [S08] Urbanization schedule is used for continuity WDI/UN; official NBS 2025 — 67,89%.

China: 1896–1911 — Late Qing: modernization without sovereign control

	Railways and new schools grew, but graduation per capita and manageability did not keep pace with demographics and external obligations.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Population	400,0 → 427,7 million	1900–1911; +6,9%	[S01]
Real GDP	388,8 → 387,0 billion intl$ 2011	1900–1911; −0,5%	[S01]
GDP per capita	972 → 905 intl$ 2011	−6,9%	[S01]
Railways	≈9,4 thousand km	1911; only ≈20% under Chinese control	[S01]
New schools	<7 thousands. → 1,6 Millions of students	1902–1909; ≈59 Thousands of schools	[S01]
Boxer indemnity	450 million Haiguanese lan	4% per annum, 39 years	[S01]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Stocks of knowledge and infrastructure arose, but external dependence and low fiscal capacity did not allow them to turn into mass income.

Meaning

Sovereignty without a mechanism for coordinating capital, territory and information remained declarative.

China: 1912–1927 — Republic: faster than the state networks

	Port cities, banks, schools and private industry developed with political fragmentation.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Population	437,1 → 487,3 million	Nearest points 1913–1929	[S01]
Real GDP	430,6 → 488,7 billion intl$	+13,5%	[S01]
GDP per capita	985 → 1 003 intl$	+1,8%	[S01]
Railways	≈8 → 12 thousands of km	1912–1927	[S01]
Students	≈3 → almost 7 million	1912–1922	[S01]
Modern industry	≈+13,8% per year	1912–1920, with very low base	[S01]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Market flows accelerated, but the central state did not provide a single money, security and infrastructure standard.

Meaning

The economic network is able to live at a weak center - but almost unable to amortize war and systemic shock.

China: 1928–1936 - Nanjing Decade: Short State Assembly

	National finance, scientific institutions and transport for the first time began to form a single contour.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Population	487,3 → 508,0 million	1929–1936	[S01]
Real GDP	488,7 → 541,0 billion intl$	+10,7%	[S01]
GDP per capita	1 003 → 1 065 intl$	+6,2%	[S01]
Modern industry	≈2% GDP	1933; island in agrarian economy	[S01]
Students	≈20 million	1936; primary and secondary schools	[S01]
Academia Sinica	founded in 1928	15 seasons of Yinshuya excavations up to 1937	[S30]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Investment and monetization accelerated, but the budget did not exceed about 8,8% GDP, and assets were concentrated on the coast.

Meaning

Institutions began to synchronize knowledge and the state; the margin of safety was less than the external threat.

China: 1937–1949 - War and hyperinflation: the destruction of capital and trust

	The military and civil divide have simultaneously destroyed physical assets, human capital and monetary coordination.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Population	510,6 → 541,7 million	1937–1949	[S01]
GDP per capita	1 034 → 799 intl$	1937–1950; −22,7%	[S01]
Total GDP	≈−17,3%	1937–1950	[S01]
Losses of War	≈15 Millions of dead	60–95 million refugees; academic estimates	[S01]
Working Railways	≈11 thousand km	from 21,8 thousand km laid to 1949	[S01]
Price level	≈×36 trillion prewar	May 1949; Bank of China retrospective	[S31]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

The issue replaced the budget, the relocation replaced reproduction, and the military logic replaced investment.

Meaning

Hyperinflation has turned the military deficit into a crisis of legitimacy: without trust, cash flow ceases to coordinate exchange.

China: 1949–1957 - Recovery and Five-Year Plan

	The industrial framework was created faster than consumer, but the restoration of health and basic production was real.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Population	541,7 → 646,5 million	+19,4%	[S04]
Real GDP	≈+9,27% per year	1953–1957; +55,8% cumulative	[S03]
Industry	≈+19,7% per year	I five-year plan	[S03]
Coal	32 → 131 million tons	1949–1957	[S05]
Electricity	4,3 → 19,3 TWT·h	1949–1957	[S05]
Steel	0,158 → 5,35 million tons	1949–1957	[S05]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Production and human reserves were rapidly recovering; agriculture and consumption remained subservient to heavy industry.

Meaning

Centralization proved to be effective for the collection of basic capital, but laid the risk of a single plan error.

China: 1958–1962 — Big jump: goal without feedback

	The mobilization of heavy industry has destroyed the food, demographic and information balance.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Real GDP	−9,3% to the level 1957	1958–1962; after +21,3% in 1958	[S03]
Grain	≈200 → 143,5 million tons	1958–1960; ≈−28%	[S32]
Grain for the soul	306 → 240 kg	1957–1962	[S32]
Mortality	25,4‰	1960; official series	[S04]
Population	662,1 → 658,6 million	1960–1961; −3,48 million	[S04]
Excess deaths	≈16,5–30 million	Academic Range	[S32]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Poor data validation and suppressed feedback have made planned acceleration a source of systemic damage.

Meaning

EQUILIBRIUM requires the right of reality to abolish a political goal; without this power turns into the destruction of reproduction.

China: 1963–1965 — Correction: V-shaped recovery

	The return of agricultural incentives and industry proportions has shown the value of adaptability even within the planned system.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Real GDP	≈+15,1% per year	1963–1965; +52,5% cumulative	[S03]
Sector A/L/H	37,3 / 32,3 / 30,4%	1965 vs 21,8 / 26,1 / 52,1% vs 1960	[S03]
Steel	6,67 → 12,23 million tons	1962–1965	[S05]
Electricity	45,8 → 67,6 TWT·h	1962–1965	[S05]
Grain for the soul	240 → 272 kg	1962–1965	[S32]
Oil	5,75 → 11,31 million tons	1962–1965	[S05]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Proportions and incentives restored the flow without changing the political regime.

Meaning

Sustainability is not determined by the absence of errors, but by the speed of recognizing the error and restoring feedback.

China: 1966–1978 — Fortress balance and strategic capabilities

	Energy, oil and defense science grew with almost frozen urbanization and damaged academic staff reproduction.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Real GDP	≈+6,25% per year	1966–1978; with recessions 1967, 1968, 1976	[S03]
Population	725,4 → 962,6 million	+32,7%	[S04]
Urbanization	17,98% → 17,92%	1965–1978; almost no shift	[S04]
Energy	188 → 628 million t.	1965–1978; ×3,34	[S05]
Oil	11,3 → 104,1 million tons	1965–1978; ×9,2	[S05]
Electricity	67,6 → 256,6 TWT·h	1965–1978; ×3,8	[S05]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Autonomy and heavy infrastructure increased; services, labor mobility, and critical scientific environments lagged behind.

Meaning

CAS helped create the atomic bomb, satellite, synthetic insulin and other results, but could not compensate for the closure of universities and the destruction of verification.

China: 1978–1991 — Reforms: Release of Hidden Productivity

	Family contract, rural and settlement enterprises and FEZ have transferred labor to more productive contours without dismantling the state.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Real GDP	≈+9,10% per year	1979–1991	[S08]
GDP	$0,150 → $0,385 trillion	1978–1991, current dollars	[S08]
Population	956 → 1 151 million	1978–1991	[S08]
Urbanization	17,92% → 26,94%	1978–1991	[S08]
Turnover	$20,6 → $135,6 billion	1978–1991	[S06]
Reserves	$0,167 → $21,7 billion	1978–1991	[S06]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

The main resource is not new capital, but the removal of administrative blockages from labor, agricultural surplus and local initiative.

Meaning

The reform showed that a combination of the market and the strategic state can increase the flow without instantaneous loss of controllability.

China: 1992–2001 - Institutional assembly before the WTO

	The market has become the main mechanism of allocation, and the state has retained control over finances, land and command heights.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Real GDP	≈+10,42% per year	1992–2001	[S08]
GDP	$0,385 → $1,355 trillion	Current dollars	[S08]
Share of world GDP	1,60% → 4,02%	Denomination	[S08]
Urbanization	26,94% → 37,66%	1991–2001	[S08]
Turnover	$509,8 billion	2001	[S06]
R & D	0,93% GDP	2001	[S08]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Market institutions and infrastructure have prepared an export push; the price is layoffs, the regional gap and weak social protection.

Meaning

By the time China joined the WTO, it was already a system of market coordination and long-term state capital, not just a “cheap factory.”

China: 2001–2008 - WTO and Export-Investment Supercycle

	The maximum external efficiency has given reserves and technologies, while increasing dependence on demand and environmental burden.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Real GDP	≈+11,06% per year	2002–2008	[S08]
GDP	$1,355 → $4,667 trillion	2001–2008	[S08]
Trade	38,1% → 56,7% GDP	Peak External Dependency	[S08]
Current account	1,28% → 9,01% GDP	2001–2008	[S08]
Reserves	$212 billion → $1,946 trillion	2001–2008	[S08]
CO₂	3,72 → 7,49 Gt	2001–2008	[S29]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

The surpluses increased the external buffer, but low consumption and emissions carried some of the costs into the future and beyond the balance sheet.

Meaning

External demand is able to accelerate modernization, but does not replace internal reproduction of income and environment.

China: 2009–2019 — Credit, infrastructure and digital platforms

	After the crisis, the external imbalance decreased, but its place was taken by domestic credit, land and real estate.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Real GDP	≈+7,82% per year	2009–2019	[S08]
GDP	$4,667 → $14,56 trillion	2008–2019	[S08]
Share of the world	7,25% → 16,40%	Nominal GDP	[S08]
Trade	56,7% → 35,45% GDP	External macro-dependence has decreased	[S08]
R & D	2,20% GDP	2019	[S07]
VSM	≈35 thousand km	2019	[S07]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Infrastructure has become a real asset; local debt and real estate a deferred liability.

Meaning

China has moved from export dependence to domestic investment, while maintaining a high capacity for execution.

China: 2020–2026 — Technological maximum and reproduction deficit

	China’s weakness is not the ability to produce, but the ability to turn production into sustainable domestic well-being.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
GDP	140,19 trillion RMB / $19,50 trillion	2025; real growth +5,0%	[S02]
Population	1 404,89 million; −3,39 million per year	2025; birth rate 7,92 million	[S02]
Urbanization	67,89%	2025, definition NBS	[S02]
Turnover	$6,355 trillion	Exports $3,772 trillion; Surplus $1,189 trillion	[S02]
R & D	3,926 trillion RMB; 2,80% GDP	2025; basic science 7,08% R&D	[S02]
Generation	10 575 TWT·h; clean 40,2%	2025; Power 3,891 TW	[S02]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Manufacturing and technology stock is record; bottlenecks are population, domestic demand, housing, debt, and household confidence.

Meaning

The next stage requires shifting the center of gravity from “investment + exports” to income, social protection and productivity.

China: what the Academy of Sciences has changed

1949 Establishment of CAS Strategic Expert Center	>1 600 Research institutions in the middle 1960- Oh, the whole system	78 thousand international PCT-applications 2025, order of magnitude	2,80% R&D / GDP 2025

The Chinese Academy of Sciences has been particularly strong as an integrator of strategic tasks: fundamental physics, atomic and space programs, materials, biology, geology, and expert support for industrial policy. Its contribution was not to “create GDP in general” but to reduce the uncertainty and time between task, research, prototype, and scaling.

Strong institutional linkage: strategic challenge → academic institute → engineering circuit → industrial scaling.
The verifiable symbolic results of the Maoist period: the atomic bomb (1964), Crystalline insulin (1965), The hydrogen bomb (1967), satellite (1970), hybrid rice and artemisinin.
The main limit: the Academy cannot replace true statistics, autonomous verification and reproduction of personnel. The closure of universities and violations of 1966–1970 years showed this boundary.
Modern challenge: the share of basic research — 7,08% R & D 2025 year; an increase in the overall budget does not automatically mean an adequate supply of open basic science.

	The Academy increases strategic autonomy when embedded in the contour of task setting and implementation; it retains EQUILIBRIUM only with independent verification and long personnel reproduction.

USA: map of 130-year transition

Period	Mechanism	Balance sheet
1896–1916	Mass production and the national market	Industrial scale, immigration and national networks have created a flow faster than social protection and financial supervision.
1917–1929	Electrification, consumer credit and vulnerability	Electricity and mass consumption increased productivity; the credit superstructure became a source of instability.
1929–1945	Depression, New Deal and Mobilization	The state became the balancer of last resort; military mobilization restored output, but through emergency mode and debt.
1945–1971	Wide post-war EQUILIBRIUM	Productivity growth, mass education, infrastructure, science, and income distribution were synchronized better than in subsequent periods.
1971–2000	Dollar, financial and digital networks	After the abandonment of gold, trust was monetized through the dollar, capital markets, technology, and regulations; production gradually lost relative weight.
2001–2019	Global Option and Financial Leverage Price	The dollar, technology, and markets allowed the deficit to be financed; the crisis of 2008 showed the price of separating financial flows from asset quality.
2020–2026	Energy and scientific power in debt and aging	US preserves advanced science, energy, capital, and networks; constraints include debt, uneven infrastructure, aging, and rapid growth in energy demand AI.

Periodization is authorial; the ranks of population, education, R&D, energy, and debt have different sources.

USA: 1896–1916 — Mass production and national market

	Industrial scale, immigration and national networks have created a flow faster than social protection and financial supervision.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Population	76,2 → 92,2 million	1900–1910	[S12]
Urban share	39,6% → 45,6%	1900–1910	[S12]
Share of world GDP	≈16%	1900, reconstruction	[S01]
Secondary school	13.5% completed	1910	[S15]
Bachelor	2,7%	1910	[S15]
Institutions	FRS 1913; NACA 1915	Coordination of Money and Aviation Science	[S14]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Industrial scale, immigration and national networks have created a flow faster than social protection and financial supervision.

USA: 1917–1929 - Electrification, consumer credit and vulnerability

	Electricity and mass consumption increased productivity; the credit superstructure became a source of instability.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Population	106 million	1920	[S12]
Urban share	51,2%	1920	[S12]
Nominal GDP	$104,6 billion	1929	[S13]
New infrastructure	car, radio, power grid	mass diffusion 1920s	[S13]
Credit	Fast expansion	consumption and securities	[S14]
Financial summary	Crash 1929	Overestimated risk and weak protection	[S14]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Electricity and mass consumption increased productivity; the credit superstructure became a source of instability.

USA: 1929–1945 — Depression, New Deal, and Mobilization

	The state became the balancer of last resort; military mobilization restored output, but through emergency mode and debt.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Real Issue	≈−30%	1929–1933	[S13]
Unemployment	≈25%	the Great Depression Peak	[S14]
Population	132,2 million	1940	[S12]
Urban share	56,5%	1940	[S12]
Secondary school	24.5% completed	1940	[S15]
Federal debt	114,1% GDP	1945	[S17]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

The state became the balancer of last resort; military mobilization restored output, but through emergency mode and debt.

USA: 1945–1971 — Wide post-war EQUILIBRIUM

	Productivity growth, mass education, infrastructure, science, and income distribution have been synchronized better than in subsequent periods.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Population	151,3 → 203,2 million	1950–1970	[S12]
Urban share	64,0% → 73,6%	1950–1970	[S12]
Electricity	334 → 1 535 TWT·h	1950–1970	[S18]
R & D	1,33% → 2,45% GDP	1953–1970; peak 2,79% at 1964	[S16]
Debt	85,7% → 35,5% GDP	1948–1970	[S17]
Institutions	NSF 1950; NASA and DARPA 1958	Federal Science and Procurement	[S16]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

Productivity growth, mass education, infrastructure, science, and income distribution were synchronized better than in subsequent periods.

USA: 1971–2000 — Dollar, financial and digital networks

	After the abandonment of gold, confidence was monetized through the dollar, capital markets, technology, and regulations; production gradually lost relative weight.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Population	203,2 → 281,4 million	1970–2000	[S12]
Urban share	73,6% → 79,0%	1970–2000	[S12]
Electricity	1 535 → 3 802 TWT·h	1970–2000	[S18]
R & D	2,45% → 2,61% GDP	1970–2000	[S16]
Debt	35,5% → 54,9% GDP	1970–2000	[S17]
Bachelor	11,0% → 25,6%	1970–2000	[S15]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

After the abandonment of gold, trust was monetized through the dollar, capital markets, technology, and regulations; production gradually lost relative weight.

USA: 2001–2019 — Global optionality and the price of financial leverage

	The dollar, technology, and markets were able to finance the deficit; the crisis of 2008 showed the price of separating financial flows from asset quality.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Population	281,4 → 328 million	2000–2019	[S12]
Federal debt	54,5% → 105,2% GDP	2001–2019	[S17]
R & D	2,63% → 3,09% GDP	2001–2019	[S16]
Current account	−6,2% GDP	2006, maximum deficit	[S13]
Electricity	≈4 PWT·h	2019, order of magnitude	[S18]
Manufacturing industry	≈10–12% GDP	end of period	[S13]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

The dollar, technology, and markets allowed the deficit to be financed; the crisis of 2008 showed the price of separating financial flows from asset quality.

USA: 2020–2026 - Energy and scientific power in debt and aging

	US preserves advanced science, energy, capital, and networks; constraints include debt, uneven infrastructure, aging, and rapid growth in energy demand AI.

Indicator	Value	Period / Perimeter	Source
Population	331,45 → 341,78 million	2020–2025	[S34]
65+	≈61,2 million; about 18%	2024	[S12]
Electricity	≈4,43 PWT·h	2025	[S18]
R & D	$1,009 trillion by PPP; 3,44% GDP	2024	[S16]
Federal debt	≈121,5% GDP	2025	[S17]
Dollars in Reserves	≈57%	2026Q1, IMF COFER	[S13]

Numbers are control points; boundaries and techniques are given in the third column.

Diagnosis EQUILIBRIUM

US preserves advanced science, energy, capital, and networks; constraints include debt, uneven infrastructure, aging, and rapid growth in energy demand AI.

USA: scientific and innovative contour

≈$1,009 trillion PPP R & D costs 2024	3,44% R&D / GDP 2024	29% World R&D 2024	1950/1958 NSF / NASA and DARPA institutional anchors

The American model is not one “academy”, but a distributed ecosystem: federal agencies formulate missions and purchase results; universities produce fundamental knowledge and personnel; entrepreneurs and the capital market scale; standards and allied networks expand the foreign market.

The advantage is a high innovative option: a lot of parallel experiments and a quick transfer of a successful solution to capital and standards.
Vulnerability is the separation of financial valuation from the quality of a physical asset, demonstrated by the crisis of 2008.
A new balance sheet challenge is the energy intensity of computing and AI: scientific flow is growing, but requires power grids, generation, water, personnel and local consent.
Federal debt raises the cost of choice: innovative and defense commitments compete with debt service and an aging population.

Three Powers: The Scale That Makes Coordination Systemic

Source: World BankS19–S21] Nominal GDP — $52,829 trillion, or 44,6% world; PPP amount — $79,265 trillion, or about 37,5% World.

Contour	Amount of three countries	Share of the world	Date	Source
Nominal GDP	$52,829 trillion	44,6% World	2025	[S19–S20]
GDP by PPP	$79,265 trillion	≈37,5% World	2025	[S21]
Population	≈1,892 billion	≈23% World	2025	[S19]
Military expenditures	$1,480 trillion	≈51% World	2025	[S22]
Territorial CO₂	≈18,96 Gt	≈49,2% World	2024	[S29]
Primary energy	≈304,5 EJ	≈49% World	2024, rating	[S28]
Foreign trade turnover	≈$12,3 trillion	≈25% world turnover	2024, gross	[S26–S27]

Trade turnover counts exports and imports and therefore contains a double bill. The energy estimate depends on the substitution method.

Meanings of three systems: not character, but an optimized function

System	What optimizes	Strong sense	Risk
China	Scope and coordination	Sovereignty through organized development and material reproduction.	Investments outpace revenues, demographics, ecology, and feedback.
USA	Optionality and Networks	Freedom of action through innovation, capital, standards and allied networks.	Financial and technological flows break away from industrial and social reproduction.
Russia	Autonomy and Survival	Sovereignty through resource depth and the ability to withstand prolonged shock.	Defense and raw materials stocks dominate diversified civilian flows.

Analytical ideal types; not a statement of a fixed national character.

	The total EQUILIBRIUM occurs when Chinese scale, American option, and Russian resilience cease to mutually destroy each other.

Contour	USA	China	Russia	Synergy
Science and technology	Advanced Research, Software, Capital	Engineering Iteration and Scaling	Fundamental school, atom, space	Idea → prototype → mass system
Production	Capital-intensive high technologies	Completeness of chains and scale	Materials, energy, heavy engineering	Low Price + Backup
Energy and climate	Technology, Finance, Market	The largest electric power industry and cleantech	Resources, Atom, Arctic	Standards for networks, atom and methane
Global risks	Calculations, satellites, epidemiology	Scale of implementation and production	Strategic stability, the Arctic	Public goods outside a lone power

The benefits of synchronization: model and formulas

	Synchronization is not a union, not a single currency and not the removal of all restrictions. This is a limited, verifiable compatibility in projects where the public result is higher than the cost of dependency.

The basic economy of the three countries in 2025 the Year Y₂₅ = $52,829 trillion With real growth 2,2% Conditional scale per year 2035 years Y₃₅ = $65,672 trillion The net effect in 2035 the Year:

Net₃₅ = F + 0,8 × (EL + S) + D − C

Component	Formula	Low/Basic/High	Logic
F - Prevented fragmentation	Y₃₅ × f	0,5% / 1,2% / 2,5%	Calibration within the range IMF 0,2–almost 7% World Edition.
EL - Trade and Logistics	T×a×c×0,5 + 5%Y₂₅×e	a=40/50/60%; c=2/4/6%; e=1/3/5%	T≈$12,3 trillion; 0,5 removes double import/export account.
S - Scientific diffusion	R×q×m	q=5/10/15%; m=25/50/75%	R≈$1,52 trillion R&D; win only on compatible circuit.
D - less security duplication	M×d×0,5	d=2/6/12%	M=$1,48 trillion; only half is considered as a productive equivalent.
C - coordination costs	Y₃₅×k	0,05/0,08/0,12%	Verification, adaptation, cybersecurity, compensation, reservation.
20%th Deduction of Overlays	0,8×(EL+S)	Single for three scenarios	It is impossible to calculate trade and scientific productivity twice.

Parameters are the author's scenario assumptions; external sources only specify the order of the bases and the permissible range of damage.

How much synchronization

Author's model. Structural Scenarios - Effect to 2035; Conservative Cut - Independent verification of sustainable annual effect.

Scenario	Clean / year	NPV 2026–2035	Before the overlaps	Interpretation
Low	$0,386 trillion	$1,73 trillion	$0,405 trillion	Limited standards, security, separate logistics
Basic	$1,001 trillion	$4,49 trillion	$1,058 trillion	Functional synchronization; recommended reference point
High	$2,072 trillion	$9,29 trillion	$2,176 trillion	Wide discharge; high political and dependency price
Conservative Review	≈$0,600 trillion	≈$4,02 trillion	—	Other base and parameters; 3-year phase, rate 4%
Strict verification	$0,779 trillion	—	—	Basic scenario without EL and S — only F + D − C

NPV of the structural model: linear effect growth from 10% to 100%, real rate 3%; coefficient 4,4839.

Basic scenario: F=$0,788 trillion; EL=$0,202 trillion and S=$0,076 trillion to 20%- his deduction; D=$0,044 trillion; C=$0,053 trillion

	The central plausible dividend is approximately $0,6–1,0 trillion per year and $4,0–4,5 trillion NPV the National Park 2026–2035. Wide scenario range — $0,36–2,07 trillion per year. This is not a budget income or a guarantee.

What is not monetized

Risk	Synchronization mechanism	Why is important	How to count
Nuclear escalation	Hotlines, notifications, rules AI and human solution	Expected damage = probability × catastrophic cost; parameters are unreliable	Show separately, do not add to GDP
Climate and methane	Compatible measurements, satellite verification, leakage standards	Three countries ≈49% Territorial CO₂	Count by Prevented Tons and Local Health
Pandemics	Early warning, sample libraries, backup power	Rare but global systemic damage	Time-Scenarios for Vaccine Detection and Release
Technological accident	Common incident protocols AI, space and cyber systems	High uncertainty and dual purpose	Limit the contour, measure the recovery time

New START expired in February 2026; SIPRI highlights the rise in nuclear uncertainty [S23].

IMF Assesses long-term losses from geo-economic fragmentation in the range 0,2% — almost 7% technological gap for individual countries - up to 12% GDP. WTO It shows almost 7% long-term loss of world GDP in a rigid two-block scenario. These estimates set the upper frame, but do not mean that tripartite coordination automatically prevents all damageS24–S25]

Secure Synchronization Architecture

Contour	Minimum subject
1. Strategic sustainability	Hotlines; notifications of exercises and launches; rules of conduct in space and cyberspace; a mandatory human solution in the nuclear circuit.
2. Reproduction	Climate and methane; pandemics; food; Arctic; fundamental science; civil nuclear energy.
3. Compatibility	Metrology; technical standards; emergency logistics; insurance and payments for permitted projects - without a single currency and political union.

Protective conditions

The narrow subject of each agreement and the symmetry of the test result.
Common basic data set, independent verification and public methodology.
Step-by-step reversible pilots; automatic review or suspension in case of violation.
Preservation of the original intellectual property and pre-defined mode of project IP.
Civil-military firewall, export control and prohibition of transfer to agreed military categories.
Diversification of critical supplies: Cooperation should not create monopoly dependence.
Openness to third countries following the same rules; absence of a closed “directorate of three”.
Distribution of benefit by proven contribution and prevented damage, not just by political weight.
Ladder disputes: Technical group → independent examination → political level → proportional suspension.

Scripts 2026–2035

Scenario	What is synchronised	Economic result	Equilibrium
Block fragmentation	Only emergency contacts	Duplication of capacities, expensive standards and logistics	Local autonomy ↑; global externalities dramatically worse
Managed Rivalry	Nuclear incidents, epidemics, selected climate data	Small direct benefit, large optional value	The main benefit is less probability of disaster
Functional Synchronization	Security + Science + Energy + Methane + Standards + Logistic permitted	≈$0,6–1,0 trillion/year as central range	The best realistic balance of autonomy and overall result
Strategic détente	Broad markets, institutions and arms control	Up to the top of the model range	Maximum gross benefit but high risk of new addiction

	The third scenario is the most stable: cooperation where the result is measurable, dependence is limited, violation is detectable, and the output is reversible.

Conclusions

	01 EQUILIBRIUM — Reproduction without the accumulation of irreversible debts.

	02 For 130 years, the three powers have been breaking down not from lack of power, but from the gap between growth, feedback, and reproduction.

	03 China has turned scale into production capacity; the new deficit is demographics, household incomes, and confidence in the future.

	04 The United States has transformed innovation, capital and standards into global flows; the weak point is social and infrastructure reproducibility.

	05 Russia has retained strategic reserves and autonomy; the bottleneck is their transformation into diversified civil flows.

	06 1991–2008 The years were not a harmony, but an unmanageable triangular synchronization of demand, production, and resources.

	07 Breaking ties increases the autonomy of individual circuits, but multiplies duplication, cost of standards, and externalities.

	08 Complete integration is unrealistic; modular synchronization of measurable public goods is realistic.

	09 The central cash dividend is about $0,6–1,0 trillion Strategic benefits of reducing tail risks may be greater, but not honestly monetized.

	10 Success is measured by recovery time, capital renewal, and benefit sharing — not by the number of agreements signed.

Annex A. Verification of model arithmetic

Variable	Value	Verification
Y₂₅	$52,829 trillion	30,770 + 19,498 + 2,561
Y₃₅	$65,672 trillion	52,829 × 1,022¹⁰
Trade Base T	$12,3 trillion	gross export+import; double count factor 0,5
R&D Base R	$1,52 trillion	nominal approximation; do not mix with PPP-estimate NSF
Military Base M	$1,48 trillion	SIPRI 2025: 954 + 336 + 190 billion
Basic F	$0,788 trillion	65,672 × 1,2%
Basic EL	$0,202 trillion	before subtracting the overlaps
Basic S	$0,076 trillion	before subtracting the overlaps
Base D	$0,044 trillion	1,48 × 6% × 0,5
Base C	$0,053 trillion	65,672 × 0,08%
Basic Net	$1,001 trillion	0,788 + 0,8×(0,202+0,076) + 0,044 − 0,053
NPV	$4,49 trillion	Net × 4,4839; Linear phase, real rate 3%

The rounding may give a difference in the last sign.

Annex B. Sources

Primary and authoritative sources. Date of access: 27 August 2026.

[S01] Maddison Project Database 2023: Historical GDP and Population

[S02] NBS China: Statistical communiqué for 2025

[S03] NBS China: GDP and real rates 1952–1978

[S04] NBS China: demographic retrospective

[S05] China Statistical Yearbook: Industrial Products

[S06] NBS China: foreign trade, historical series

[S07] NBS China: Statistical communiqué for 2019

[S08] World Bank WDI: China, macroeconomic indicators

[S09] IMF: China 2025 Article IV Consultation

[S10] CAS: official profile of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

[S11] WIPO: PCT Yearly Review 2026

[S12] U.S. Census Bureau: Historical Tables of Population and Urbanization

[S13] BEA: National Income and Product Accounts

[S14] Federal Reserve History: The Creation of the Fed and the Great Depression

[S15] U.S. Department of Education/NCES: Digest of Education Statistics

[S16] NSF/NCSES: R&D and research publications, 2024

[S17] U.S. Treasury/Fiscal Data: Federal Government Debt

[S18] EIA: Monthly Energy Review and Electricity Data

[S19] World Bank: comparison of the USA, China and Russia

[S20World Bank: Global GDP and the Three Powers

[S21] World Bank: PPP GDP

[S22] SIPRI: World military expenditures in 2025

[S23] SIPRI Yearbook 2026: Nuclear Weapons and the End of the New START

[S24] IMF: the range of losses from geoeconomic fragmentation

[S25] WTO: The scenario of dividing the world economy into two blocks

[S26] WTO: Global Trade Outlook and Statistics 2025

[S27] BEA: U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, 2024

[S28] Energy Institute: Statistical Review of World Energy

[S29] Global Carbon Budget / Our World in Data: territorial emissions CO₂

[S30] Academia Sinica: Inshu's excavations

[S31] Bank of China: hyperinflation 1946–1949 years

[S32] PMC: Great Chinese Famine — Grain and Demographic Estimates

[S33] WIPO: World Intellectual Property Indicators 2025

[S34] U.S. Census Bureau: population clock/data

[S35] World Bank: Russia — macroeconomic profile

Annex C. Terms and reservations

Term	Value
GDP by PPP	Estimation of output adjusted for differences in domestic prices. It is not a market value of assets or a foreign exchange resource.
Current dollars	Nominal conversion at the current rate; sensitive to currency and deflators.
International dollar 2011	Maddison's historical reconstruction unit; does not mix with current dollars.
PPP R & D	Comparison of real research resources; not equal to nominal budget in dollars.
Scenario	Conditional calculation with given parameters. Not a promise, not a prediction, not a causal estimate.
NPV	The present value of the effect flow; depends on the implementation trajectory and discount rate.
Tail risk	A rare event with huge damage; the expected cost is extremely sensitive to probability.
Synchronization	Limited compatibility of data, standards, protocols and projects while maintaining political autonomy.

End of document

Source materials

Originals and versions of the document

Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_Equilibrium_Sinhronizatsiya.docxDOCX · main document
Download
Balansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_Equilibrium_Sinhronizatsiya.pptxPPTX · related version
View Download

Other editions in web format

Each version is disclosed separately; the sequence of the source document is saved.

EQUILIBRIUM Three PowersBalansy_Kitaya_SSHA_1896-2026_EQUILIBRIUM_Sinhronizatsiya.pptx · web text

China and the United States in 130 years

$0,6–1,0

trillion PER YEAR

$4,0–4,5 trillion

Russia as the third circuit • 1896–2026

NPV 2026–2035

Balances • Meanings • Synchronization Benefits

The script,

not forecast

Prepared for Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich

27 August 2026

Synchronization is able to $0,6–1,0 trillion per year

SUMMARY FOR DECISIONS

$0,60 trillion

$1,00 trillion

$4,49 trillion

$0,36–2,07 trillion

Conservative Cut

base scenario

NPV

Wide Uncertainty

sustainable annual effect

Effect to 2035

2026–2035, rate 3%

Low - High Scenario

This is not a union, not a budget income or a forecast. This is a scenario assessment of the prevented losses and compatible efficiency.

The main monetary channel is less fragmentation of standards, trade, energy and science.

Nuclear, climate and pandemic tail risk are not included.

The realistic format is modular, testable and reversible synchronization.

EQUILIBRIUM - reproduction without irreversible debts

CONCEPT

Not equality of forces. Not the absence of conflict. Not a maximum release.

REPRODUCTION + ΔRESERVES

AMORTIZATION + HUERB + DEPENDENT RISK

Growth is sustainable only if it does not deplete people, infrastructure, nature, trust and security.

Index E is the geometric mean of the six axes: a strong measurement cannot completely hide the failure of a weak one.

Six axes separate balance from growth illusion

RUBRIC

RESERVES

FLOWS

REPRODUCTION

Capital, resources, people, institutions

Revenue, Trade, Energy, Productivity

Demographics, health, education, research and development

SUSTAINABILITY

LEGALITY

EXTERNAL EFFECTS

Reserves, diversification, recovery time

Rules, trust, distribution, feedback

Emissions, risks, future liabilities

Rapid GDP can hide the depletion of the next cycle.

In 130 years, the three powers have built different power machines

COMPARATIVE LOGIC

CHINA

USA

RUSSIA

Scale

coordination

Optionality

Network

Autonomy

Survival Rate

RISK

Large scale error detected late

Financial Flows are Disrupted from Reproduction

Strategic reserves are poorly converted into civilian flows

EQUILIBRIUM occurs when these functions complement each other - without imposing a single model entirely.

1896–1949: China modernized faster than the state collected

CHINA • EARLY

1896–1911

1912–1927

1928–1936

1937–1949

Late Qing

Republic

Nanking

War

GDP/Soul 972→905; 9,4 thousand km railway; 1,6 Millions of new school students.

GDP/soul almost stood; w/d 8→12 thousand km; faster than the center.

GDP +10,7%; the Soul +6,2%; budget ≤8,8% GDP.

GDP/Soul −22,7%; ≈15 Millions of deaths; hyperinflation.

1900–1950: population +36,7%, Real GDP +12,4%, GDP per capita −17,8%.

Infrastructure and education grew from a low base.

Weak money, territory and taxes did not create a general outline.

War has destroyed capital; hyperinflation has destroyed trust.

1949–1978: Mobilization created power but damaged feedback

CHINA • MOBILIZATION CONTOUR

1949–1957

1958–1962

1963–1965

1966–1978

Recovery

Big Leap

Correction

Fortress balance

GDP +9,3%/year; industry ≈+19,7%; Steel 0,16→5,35 million tons.

GDP −9%; Grain −28%; mortality 25,4‰; 16,5–30 Millions of excess deaths.

GDP +15,1%/year; return of industry proportions; grain/soul 240→272 kg.

Energy ×3,3; Oil ×9,2; Urbanization ≈0 p.p.; higher education institutions violated.

CAS strengthened the atomic, space and biomedical contours - but could not replace truthful data and personnel reproduction.

The main lesson: the right of reality to cancel a political goal is a critical element of equilibrium.

1978–2001: Incentives turned numbers into productivity

CHINA • REFORMS

+9,1%/year

17,9% → 37,7%

$20,6 → $509,8 billion

Real GDP

Urbanization

Trade

1979–1991

1978–2001

The first source of the miracle is the removal of administrative blockages from labor and rural surplus.

The market has entered into a strong state.

FEZ and local enterprises have created a pilot circuit.

Price: layoffs, inequality, rip-off of the coast - inland areas.

2001–2019: external imbalance replaced by internal credit

CHINA • GLOBALIZATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

2001–2008

2009–2019

WTO: Maximum external efficiency

Credit, infrastructure, platforms

GDP $1,36→4,67 trillion; Trade 38,1→56,7% GDP; current account 9,0%; Reserves $1,95 trillion; CO₂ ×2.

GDP $4,67→14,56 trillion; share of the world 7,25→16,40%; Trade has declined to 35,45% GDP; R & D 2,20%; VSM ≈35 thousands of km.

China has reduced external macro-dependence but has suffered some of the imbalance in real estate, land and debt of local structures.

Infrastructure is a real asset. Funding commitments are a deferred balance sheet.

2020–2026: China's main deficit is reproduction

CHINA • CURRENT

$19,50 trillion

−3,39 million

2,80% GDP

10 575 TWT·h

Nominal GDP

Population change

R & D

Generation

+5,0% the Real World 2025

2025; 7,92 million births

3,926 trillion RMB

40,2% net

Contour	Fact 2025	Balance signal
Trade	$6,355 trillion; Surplus $1,189 trillion	External competitiveness is high
Real estate	Investments −17,2%	The old investment machine is shrinking.
Reserves	$3,358 trillion	External buffer remains large
Demography	65+ = 15,9%	The price of social protection and labor shortage is growing

Next transition: investment + export → household income + social protection + productivity.

China's balance: coordination strong, feedback vulnerable

CHINA • RESULTS

Axis	Strength Side	Limitation
Reserves	Industry, networks, infrastructure	Property and some debt overvalued
Streams	Export, electricity, scaling	Weak domestic demand
Reproduction	Education and R & D	Population reduction, ageing
Resilience	Reserves and chain completeness	Energy and trade external risks
Legality	Ability to execute	Late detection of scale error
External effects	Green Power	≈12,3 Gt CO₂ in 2024

Weakness is not the ability to produce; weakness is the ability to turn production into sustainable well-being.

Academy Strengthens Sovereignty — But Doesn't Replace Verification

CHINA •

1949

>1 600

≈78 thousands.

7,08%

creation CAS

Research Institutes

PCT-applications

basic science

Strategic Expert Center

the whole system by the middle of the 1960s

2025, order of magnitude

share in R&D, 2025

Strong Linkage: Problem → Institute → engineering circuit → scaling.

Testable results: atom, satellite, insulin, hybrid rice, artemisinin.

The limits of the system were shown by the Cultural Revolution: the closure of universities damaged personnel reproduction.

The budget of science does not compensate for weak statistics and suppressed criticism.

1896–1945: US Connects Industry, Standards, and State Risk

USA • Early

1896–1916

1917–1929

1929–1945

Mass production

Electrification and credit

Balanced State

Population 76,2→92,2 million; urban 39,6→45,6%; Fed 1913; NACA 1915.

V 1920 Most of them became urban. GDP 1929 ≈$104,6 billion; Credit risk ahead of supervision.

Release −≈30%; Unemployment ≈25%; C 1945 Debt ≈115–118% GDP.

The market did not restore balance automatically: the New Deal and mobilization transferred systemic risk to the federal state.

Scale became a system only after institutions of money, standard, science, and last resort.

1945–1971: U.S. closest to broad equilibrium

USA • AFTER EQUILIBRIUM

151 → 203 million

334 → 1 535

1,33% → 2,45%

≈86% → ≈35%

population

electricity, TWt·h

R&D / GDP

Federal Debt/GDP

1950–1970

1953–1970; peak 2,79%

1950–1971

Mass education and housing expanded productivity and demand.

Federal missions generated NSF, NASA, DARPA and technology procurement.

Infrastructure and production grew with households.

The debt load was reduced against the background of an increase in nominal output.

Peak EQUILIBRIUM: Science, infrastructure, production, and mass demand reinforced each other.

1971–2000: Dollar and digital networks have expanded the space of choice

USA • NETWORK OPTIONALITY

203 → 281 million

1 535 → 3 802

11,0% → 25,6%

population

electricity, TWt·h

Bachelor and above

1970–2000

After abandoning gold convertibility, the U.S. monetized confidence in the dollar, capital markets, technology, and rules.

R&D held about 2,5–2,6% GDP.

Debt has risen from about 35% to 55% GDP.

Production gradually lost relative weight to finance, software and services.

Option has grown, but has become dependent on trust in rules and global networks.

2001–2019: flows remained, reproduction began to diverge

USA • GLOBAL DISBALANCES

54,5% → 105%

2,63% → 3,09%

−6,2% GDP

≈11% GDP

Federal Debt/GDP

R&D / GDP

Current Account

manufacturing

2001–2019

2006, maximum deficit

End of period, order

The dollar allowed to finance the deficit; the crisis of 2008 showed the price of hidden leverage and weak asset quality.

Platforms and intangible assets have enhanced global flows.

The growth in electricity demand has almost stopped, the infrastructure has aged unevenly.

Regional and social gaps undermined the overall contract.

2020–2026: US leadership remains strong, but becomes more expensive

USA • CURRENT

341,8 million

$1,009 trillion

≈4,43 PWT·h

≈121,5%

population

PPP R & D

utility-scale generation

Federal Debt/GDP

2025; 65+ ≈18,9%

2024; 3,44% GDP

2025; +Small Sun

2025

Contour	Current Power	Current Limitation
Energy	>103 quads; oil 13,2 million b/d	Networks and local permissions
Science	29% World R&D	Cost of calculations and personnel
Dollar	57,13% Distributed reserves	Evaluative effects and geopolitics
External balance	Deficit −2,9% GDP, 2026Q1	Dependence on external financing

Strengths are energy and R&D; constraints are debt, aging, and infrastructure load AI.

U.S. Balance: Option is strong, horizons are weak

USA • FINAL

Axis	Strength Side	Limitation
Reserves	Universities, capital, energy, technology	Uneven physical infrastructure
Streams	Dollar, data, finance, standards	Deficits and financial dependence
Reproduction	Immigration, education, research and development	Aging and high cost of services
Resilience	Alliances and diversification	Chain complexity and political polarization
Legality	Competition of Institutions	Difficulty of a long social contract
External effects	Innovative public goods	Military and financial extraterritoriality

The U.S. is quickly creating options — but harder to turn them into a long-term public contract.

Russia adds autonomy, depth of resources and ability to withstand shock

RUSSIA • THIRD CONTOUR

1896–1917

1917–1991

1991–2026

The Russian Empire

USSR

Russian Federation

Modernization of railways, banks and science; social and managerial contours did not have time to stabilize the system.

The scientific and industry system created industrial, nuclear and space power; the adaptability of the civilian circuit lagged.

Resources, defense, and fundamental school support autonomy; demography and civil commercialization limit reproduction.

Strong function: strategic autonomy and resource sustainability. Narrowing: transforming stocks into diversified civilian flows.

In the trilateral model, Russia is not a “bridge”, but an independent outline of energy, materials, the Arctic and strategic stability.

Scale, optionality and autonomy can complement each other

MEANINGS

CHINA

USA

RUSSIA

Sovereignty through

Organized development

Freedom of action through

Innovation and Networks

Sovereignty through

Autonomy and depth

RISK

Investments outpace revenues, demographics and the environment

Financial options break away from physical reproduction

Defense and resource reserve dominates the civil flow

Not a single model - compatibility of functions.

The three powers concentrate almost half of the key global flows

MASSHTAB 2024–2025

$52,83 trillion

Nominal GDP

44,6% world, 2025

≈1,89 billion

population

≈23% World Peace, 2025

Even the narrow coordination of standards and risks has a global effect.

Different years and methods; shares are shown as an order of scale.

Complementarity exists, but only with limited dependence

MAP SYNERGY

Contour	USA	China	Russia	Synergy
Science	Research, PO, capital	Scaling	Elementary School, Atom	Idea → system
Production	High technology	Completeness of chains	Materials and Energy	Price + reserve
Energy	Technology and Finance	Networks and cleantech	Resources, Atom, Arctic	Common standards
Global risks	Calculations and satellites	Scope of implementation	Strategic stability	Public goods

Cooperation is useful where the result is checked, the dependence is limited, the violation is detectable, and the output is reversible.

Dividend creates four channels - and reduces two amendments

MODEL

Net₃₅ = F + 0,8 × (EL + S) + D − C

F: Prevented fragmentation

EL: Trade and Logistics

S: scientific diffusion

D: Less conflict duplication

C: Verification, adaptation, compensation

0,8: EL and S overlap deduction

Baseline: $1,001 trillion in 2035.

The basic effect of c 2035 The year - about $1 trillion Annually

SCENARIUM AND VERIFICATION

Scenario	Year	NPV 2026–35
Low	$0,386 trillion	$1,73 trillion
Basic	$1,001 trillion	$4,49 trillion
High	$2,072 trillion	$9,29 trillion
Conservative	≈$0,600 trillion	≈$4,02 trillion

Protected Central Orientation: $0,6–1,0 trillion per year; NPV ≈$4,0–4,5 trillion

Strict inspection without trade and R&D: $0,779 trillion

The strongest result is a reduction in the risk of irreversible error

NON-MONITIZED USE

Nuclear escalation

Climate and methane

Pandemics

Technoavari

Hotlines, notifications, human solution in the nuclear circuit, rules AI.

Compatible measurements, satellite verification, leakage standards.

Early warning, samples, backup power and vaccine acceleration.

Incident protocols AI, space and cyber systems; recovery time measurement.

The rare risk of × catastrophic damage can not be honestly reduced to one "exact" amount - so it is shown separately.

New START The Expires February 2026; The greatest value is to reduce the likelihood of a false escalation.

Working synchronization should be modular and reversible

ARCHITECTURE

Strategic sustainability

Reproduction

Compatibility

Hotlines, notifications, space, cyberspace, rules AI and incidents.

Climate and methane, pandemics, food, the Arctic, basic science, civil atom.

Metrology, standards, emergency logistics, insurance and calculations of permitted projects.

General data set + independent verification

Phased reversible pilots

Protection of source and project intellectual property

Civil-Military Firewall and Export Control

Diversification of critical supplies

Openness to third countries under the same rules

Project criterion: the result is measurable, dependence is limited, violation is detectable, output is reversible.

Balance begins where forces stop destroying each other.

CONCLUSIONS

Scale achieved; the main limit is reproduction and feedback.

China

Option maximum; limit - long public and infrastructure contract.

USA

Autonomy is strong; the limit is a diversified civil flow.

Russia

$0,6–1,0 trillion/year - central monetary benchmark, not a guarantee.

Synchronization

Less likely nuclear, climate, pandemic and technological disaster.

Main use

Full integration is unrealistic; modular synchronization of measurable public goods is realistic and economically meaningful.

Sources indicated in the presentation 24

https://data.worldbank.org/?locations=US-CN-RU
https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2023/01/16/confronting-fragmentation-where-it-matters-most-trade-debt-and-climate-action
[/Sources]
https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news25_e/dgno_09apr25_e.htm
https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/releases/maddison-project-database-2023
https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202302/t20230203_1899178.html
https://www.stats.gov.cn/zt_18555/ztfx/qzxzgcl60zn/202303/t20230301_1920384.html
https://english.cas.cn/about-cas/
https://data.worldbank.org/country/china
https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202602/t20260228_1962661.html
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-country
https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/data/tables.html
https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/
https://www.bea.gov/itable/national-gdp-and-personal-income
https://www.federalreservehistory.org/
https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsbsep20261/discovery-r-d-activity-and-research-publications-2
https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/
https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/datasets/debt-to-the-penny/debt-to-the-penny
https://data.worldbank.org/country/russian-federation
https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2026/increasing-focus-nuclear-weapons-amid-heightened-escalation-risks-new-sipri-yearbook-out-now
https://data.worldbank.org/?locations=1W-US-CN
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.PP.CD
https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2026/global-military-spending-rise-continues-european-and-asian-expenditures-surge
https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review/resources-and-data-downloads