Brief annotation
About the document
A set of materials for discussion of the system of balances and programs with the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs.
Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.pptx
Downloading the document...
EQUILIBRIUM · ECO-PPA · SPECZASHCHITA · ESG-IR · SFERA
President of RSPP Alexander Shokhin
Initiator: Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · 29 August 2026
Status: Proposal for expert discussion; not a solution or standard of the RUIE
02 / OFFICIAL TREATMENT
the President of the Russian Union
Industrialists and Entrepreneurs
Shokhin Alexander Nikolaevich
Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich
About carrying out on the site of RSPP 90-day approbation of the contour of formation and verification of industrial, environmental and social projects
Dear Alexander Nikolaevich!
Russian business needs an agreed mechanism linking the strategic task of the company or territory with the project solution, the obligations of the parties, resources, calendar, primary data and independently verifiable result.
I propose to hold on the site of RSPP 90-day organizational and methodological approbation of the author 's design and analytical outline "EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA — ESG-IR — SFERAthe Materials of Voluntary Participating Companies and Industry Associations.
Limit of offer
Approbation does not create funding obligations for the RSPP, does not mean the acceptance of the methodology by the RSPP standard and does not replace audit, mandatory reporting, expertise or government regulation.
Support 90-day testing.
To instruct the RSPP staff to identify a coordinator and prepare the composition of the working group and the technical task within 15 calendar days.
Invite relevant committees and voluntarily participating companies to submit up to three project cases to test the methodology.
Following the test, consider the consolidated report and decide on a 12-month pilot, revision of the methodology or completion of the experiment.
I am ready to present the architecture of the system and the draft of the technical task at a working meeting at a convenient time for you.
With respect,
Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich
severa70@mail.ru
03 / SOLUTION CARD
One limited solution is required
Allow verification of the mechanism on voluntary cases - without financial and reputational advance from the RSPP.
Draft decision
To support 90-day organizational and methodological testing; to identify a coordinator; to form a working group; to select up to three cases; on 90-th day to take a decision GO / GO WITH CONDITIONS / NO-GO.
| Parameter | Proposed design |
|---|---|
| Playground | RSPP as an institutional coordinator of the business circuit. |
| Subject | Project passport, obligations, resources, data, risks, evidence and adjustment rules. |
| Participants | Up to three voluntary cases; preferably at least two companies and two industry contexts. |
| Timeframe | 90 calendar days from the approval of the technical specification. |
| Result | Proven methodology, demonstration register, expert opinions, list of gaps and decision on further status. |
| What is not required | RUIE financing, investment guarantee, acceptance of commercial or technological risk, preliminary recognition of the standard. |
Logic corresponds to the previously formulated principle: RSPP is proposed not to adopt the system, but to jointly test the model.
04 / CONFORMITY OF THE RUIE
The proposal meets the current business agenda of the RSPP
Approbation combines the tasks of investment, technological sovereignty, cooperation, digitalization and evidence-based sustainability.
| RUIE priority | Package pairing point | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Balanced growth and investment | Selection of projects on the completeness of the mandate, resources, risks and measurable results. | [1], [2] |
| Project and infrastructure financing | Preparation of a verifiable project dossier before attracting PPP instruments, credit or bonds. | [1], [3] |
| Technological Sovereignty | Accounting for R&D, software, technology rights, engineering, localization and independent expertise. | [4], [5] |
| Industrial cooperation | Assembling a consortium to the specific request of the enterprise and replicating only a proven solution. | [5] |
| Digitalization and productivity | Unified data passport, reproducible calculation and protected demonstration register. | [6], [7] |
| Responsible business practices | The project chain of evidence as a complement to the current indices and public assurance of the RSPP. | [8] |
| Ecology and climate | Measurable effect, adaptation, natural data and balance of environmental objectives with the capabilities of companies. | [9], [10] |
Positioning
Not a new comprehensive system, but a limited protocol for the preparation and verification of design solutions, compatible with the existing tools of companies and RSPP.
05 / VERIFIED PROBLEM
Initiative and report often exist separately from the proven result
- Break 1. The strategic task is not translated into a single passport with the owner, borders and initial condition.
- Break 2. Resources and obligations are accounted for in different systems and do not form a common chain of responsibility.
- Break 3. The result indicator is fixed without a pre-approved methodology, baseline and data source.
- Break 4. The executor, data owner and verifier may depend on each other.
- Break 5. Reporting appears after execution and does not manage adjustments during the project.
- Break 6. A successful case is difficult to replicate and scale without a common solution dossier.
Approbation Hypothesis
By linking mandate, passport, commitment, resources, primary data and independent verification in a single version chain, the decision to fund and scale will become more explainable and verifiable. This hypothesis must be confirmed or refuted by real cases.
06 / TRAVEL ROUTE
From enterprise request to scaling decision
Short formula
RSPP forms a request → EQUILIBRIUM Design Options → ECO-PPA consolidates the project and obligations → SPECZASHCHITA Collects execution → ESG-IR proves the result → SFERA Scaling a Verified Solution.
1. Request. A company or industry association formulates the problem, the owner of the solution and the boundaries of the case.
2. Diagnostics. EQUILIBRIUM Comparing the initial state, 19 Balance Sheets, Risks, Scenarios and Data Shortages.
3. Design. ECO-PPA converts the selected scenario into a passport, obligations, resource plan, calendar and result conditions.
4. Cooperation. SPECZASHCHITA forms performers, work packages, supply chain and evidentiary materials.
5. Verification. ESG-IR records the methods, origin of the data, independence of verification and status of each statement.
6. Portfolio. SFERA collects proven solutions and partners; The RSPP decides on further approbation or scaling.
Confirmed data is returned to EQUILIBRIUM for a new cycle of analysis and adjustment.
07 / PROJECT COUNTING SYSTEM
Eight related registries maintain the integrity of the project
This is not a replacement for accounting, ERP, EDMS or state information systems, but a connecting layer of project events.
R1 Mandate and authority - who is entitled to initiate, select, execute, own, verify and challenge data.
R2 Rights and Assets - What is owned, available, licensed, limited or encumbered.
R3 Obligations and risks - who, what, to whom and by what date should; who carries the risk of rejection.
R4 Resources and financing - sources, limits, reserves, conditions of use and actual consumption.
R5 Designs and solutions - options, selected scenario, feasibility study, calendar, assumptions and solution version.
R6 Actions and Executions - Work Packages, Deliveries, Checkpoints, and Deviations
R7 Data and evidence - source, owner, methodology, signature, measurement, origin and status of verification.
R8 Results and adjustments - change before/after, attribution, output, new version event and project lesson.
End-to-end identifier
One event identifier links records in all affected registries. An unrelated record cannot serve as the basis for a final calculation or statement of effect.
08 / UNIVERSAL PASSPORT
Passport of the project event — atom of approbation
| Block | Required fields | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ID, type, territory, time, version. | uniqueness, immutability |
| Basis | law, mandate, agreement, limit. | authority, term |
| Problem and baseline | boundaries, initial state, cut-off date. | materiality, comparability |
| Parties | initiator, owner, executor, beneficiary, validator. | Division of roles |
| Sign in | right, resource, data, obligation, risk. | ownership, quality, access |
| Decision | scenario, feasibility study, calendar, assumptions, stop conditions. | approval, version |
| Withdrawal | new condition, result, residue, side effect. | Attribution, double counting |
| Evidence | methodology, measurement, document, signature, expert verification. | origin, independence |
| Responsibility | owner of risk, SLA, dispute, correction. | Escalation, adjustment |
Version Rule
The error is not erased: a compensating event is created with a reference to the original record, the cause, the author, the time and a new version of the technique.
09 / MATRICA FULL
3 × 13 × 19 = 741 — The author's engineering hypothesis of completeness
Formula
Three Scales - Man, State, Planet - × thirteen phases of the life cycle × nineteen balances = 741 verification position. Each position answers: what is known, who is responsible, what is confirmed and whether an adjustment is required?
| Status | Meaning | Management action |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - no data | source is missing or unassigned | appoint the owner and term |
| 1 - observation | data is available, the threshold is not confirmed | check the quality |
| 2 - Risk | corridor is broken or insufficient evidence | Escalation to the owner of risk |
| 3 — management | mandate, resource and action recorded | Monitoring of execution |
| 4 — proven | The result is independently verified | calculation and possible replication |
| 5 — adjustment | conditions have changed or an error has been detected | create a new version event |
Limitation
The matrix 741 is not claimed to be an RUIE standard, company rating or regulatory requirement. In approbation, only its practical utility for identifying unknown critical areas is tested.
10 / ECO-PPA
ECO-PPA collects project, commitment and resources
The working mechanism of the project assembly - until the final legal design of each case is determined.
Passport. object, territory, problem, baseline, parties and version of the design solution
Commitments. who provides the resource, who performs the action, who accepts the result and who carries the risk
Economic sources, budget and extra-budgetary instruments, the price of the result, reserves and calculation conditions
Calendar. Checkpoints, conditions of beginning, stopping, revision and completion
Evidence. metrics, methodologies, primary data, quality control and independent verification
Adjustment. order of change of initial condition, price, volume, terms and responsibility
Legal disclaimer
ECO-PPA is not declared an independent type of contract established by law. In each case, the lawyers qualify the applicable design: supply contract, contract, service, offset, concession, PPP, project financing or their acceptable combination.
Approbation ends not with the signing of the transaction, but with a verified project dossier and a list of legal options.
11 / PROOF ESG-IR
Each significant statement passes one chain of verification
Chain
Indicator → Methodology → baseline → Primary data → Owner → date → calculation → Proof → independent verification → status.
Method to result. The unit, boundaries, formula, assumptions, periodicity and criterion of materiality are fixed in advance.
Origin of data. The source, access right, version, quality control and all conversions are retained.
Status of approval. “confirmed”, “waiting for verification”, “rejected” or “not applicable”; there are no significant unsigned findings.
Independence. The Contractor does not confirm its own result; the conflict of interest is disclosed and managed.
Reproduction. The expert can repeat the calculation according to the same version of the data and methodology.
Conjugation with RSPP practice
ESG-IR is proposed as an experimental project layer of evidence, complementing, rather than replacing, the existing indices, non-financial reporting and public certification of the RSPP [8].
ESG-IR does not replace audit, EIA, government review, mandatory reporting or supervisory procedures.
12 / DIVISION OF TERMS
No circuit selects, executes and confirms its result simultaneously
| Contour | Responsibility | Not |
|---|---|---|
| RSPP | platform, business mandate, companies, rules of approbation and final decision | an investor, operator or verifier of projects |
| EQUILIBRIUM | Diagnostics, Balances, Scenarios, Priorities and Analytical Options | the Corporate or State Decision Body |
| ECO-PPA | passport, obligations, resources, calendar, risks and contractual assembly | Independent type of contract without legal qualification |
| SPECZASHCHITA | consortium, organization, execution and supporting materials | Independent reviewer of own results |
| ESG-IR | indicators, data origin, verification rules and independent review | replacement of audit, reporting or state examination |
| SFERA | portfolio, communication, search for partners and replication of proven | Source of primary evidence or admission authority |
Formula of responsibility
RSPP sets the platform and business mandate; EQUILIBRIUM see and prepare options; ECO-PPA collects the project; SPECZASHCHITA organizes execution; ESG-IR proves; SFERA Distributes only verified.
13 / APPRECIATION BODIES
The working group manages the experiment, not the projects of the companies
Coordinator from RSPP. convenes a working group, fixes decisions, routes cases and monitors mandate compliance
Participating companies. provide the case voluntarily, appoint the owners of the decision and data, determine the confidentiality regime
Industry experts. check the applicability of the methodology, technological assumptions and industry restrictions
The operator of the technique. prepares passports, dictionaries, a demonstration register and methodological materials
Legal and information security. checks law, data, trade secrets, IP, intellectual rights and cyber risks
Independent reviewers. evaluate the reproducibility of calculations, the sufficiency of evidence and conflicts of interest
Recommended sites for routing by the decision of the RSPP Office:
- Committee on Environment and Climate Policy;
- Committee on Sustainable Development and Population Policy;
- Coordinating Council on Technological Leadership and Industrial Policy;
- profile financial, digital and industry contours of RSPP.
14 / PLAN 90 DAYS
Six steps lead to a testable solution on day 90
| Timeframe | Stage | Verified result |
|---|---|---|
| 1–10 | Mandate and perimeter | coordinator, working group, TK, restrictions, confidentiality |
| 11–25 | Selection of cases | up to three cases, owners, source materials, materiality criteria |
| 26–45 | Passports | passports ECO-PPA, baseline, roles, risks, indicators, data deficit |
| 46–65 | Evidence | data dictionary, methods, ESG-IR-chains, legal and information security check |
| 66–80 | End-to-end test | demonstration register, two consecutive sections, reproducibility test |
| 81–90 | Decision | final report, independent review, plan 12 months, GO / conditions / NO-GO |
Results 90 days
Regulations on the working group; a single dictionary; case passports; register of risks and obligations; protocol ESG-IR; conclusions on law, data and information security; demonstration register; project 12-month pilot.
It is recommended to complete at least two cases with a full end-to-end test; incomplete cases are documented as proven limitations of the technique.
15 / LAW, DATA AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Evidence is built without excessive data disclosure
- Minimization. Only the amount of data required for a specific check is transmitted.
- Possession. The source and legal owner of the data are recorded; participation does not change ownership automatically.
- Separation of access. Open, working, confidential and protected layers have different modes.
- Versionality. The original records, conversions, methodologies and adjustment decisions are retained.
- Publication. External disclosure is allowed only with the consent of the owner and after verification of trade secrets.
- Intellectual rights. The methodology, initial decisions of the companies and joint results are delimited by the agreement before the work begins.
Stop-conditions
Approbation is suspended if there is no legal basis for data processing; it is impossible to separate the operator from the verifier; critical infrastructure is disclosed; third-party rights are violated; there is no appeal mechanism.
Specific requirements are determined by lawyers, data owners and information security specialists for each case.
16 / TRANSITION CRITERIA
Transition to 12 months is possible only under critical conditions
- At least two companies confirm further participation in writing.
- Each case has a decision owner and data owner.
- Mandatory passport fields are filled or the data deficit is officially accepted by the working group.
- For key indicators, a unit, baseline, source, methodology, frequency and method of verification are determined.
- All significant statements have signed status; calculations are reproduced by an independent expert.
- At least two consecutive data slices are obtained.
- There are no unresolved critical legal, informational or ethical risks.
- The contractor does not confirm its own result.
- The companies approved a resource and organizational plan for a 12-month-old pilot.
| Decision | Condition |
|---|---|
| GO | All critical conditions are met |
| GO WITH CONDITIONS | There are only non-critical breaks with the owner and the approved deadline for elimination. |
| NO-GO / REDESIGN | no owner, the result is immeasurable, the calculation is irreproducible or a critical conflict of interest persists |
17 / CONTOUR 12-MONTH PILOT
Pilot Scales Proven Process, Not Promised Effect
| Period | Main objective | Result of period |
|---|---|---|
| Months 1–3 | Regulatory and technical architecture | contracts, data model, integration, independence rules |
| Months 4–6 | Production cycles of cases | operational events, control sections, deflection management |
| Months 7–9 | effect and reproducibility check | independent calculations, adjustments, industry comparison |
| Months 10–12 | Scaling Assessment | Final dossier, economic and legal assessment, decision of RSPP and companies |
Prior to the start of the pilot, a separate approval is required:
- perimeter of companies, cases, data and integrations;
- budget and sources of funding - without assuming that the RSPP finances the pilot;
- methods of indicators, independent reviewer and rules of conflict of interest;
- order of publication, protection of trade secrets and distribution of intellectual property rights;
- Stop conditions, order of dispute, adjustment and completion.
The criterion of success
At least one reproducible route from signal to adjustment where authority, resource, action, data, proof, and solution can be restored.
18 / DRAFT RESOLUTION
Draft order of the President of RSPP
1. Support
Conducting 90-day organizational and methodological testing without the obligations of the RSPP to finance projects and without prior recognition of the methodology as an instrument or standard of the RSPP.
2. RSPP, together with the interested committees and departments, shall submit within 15 calendar days:
- the candidate coordinator;
- Draft regulations on the working group;
- technical task;
- list of voluntarily participating organizations and cases;
- rules for working with data, trade secrets and approbation results.
3. The Working Group shall ensure:
- testing the methodology on a limited set of voluntary cases;
- independent legal, technical and methodological review;
- preservation of the right of companies to terminate participation in the manner prescribed by the terms of reference.
4. Upon completion 90 days
Submit to the President of the RSPP the final report and draft decision: go to the 12-month pilot; continue refining with the conditions; or complete the experiment.
The wording is a project for legal and organizational improvement by the RSPP.
19 / SET OF APPLICATIONS
Package ready for review at the first working meeting
- Annex 1. One-page solution card and testing limits.
- Annex 2. Draft regulation on the working group.
- Annex 3. Technical specifications for 90 days.
- Annex 4. Passport form of the project event / ECO-PPA.
- Annex 5. Dictionary of eight registers, 19 balances and 13 phases.
- Annex 6. Map of completeness 741 and status rules.
- Annex 7. Protocol ESG-IR and verification independence requirements.
- Annex 8. Form of voluntary consent of the company and confidentiality regime.
- Annex 9. Criteria for selection of cases and the template of the initial data.
- Annex 10. Register of risks, conflicts of interest and stop conditions.
- Annex 11. GO / GO Criteria WITH CONDITIONS / NO-GO.
- Annex 12. Contour 12-month pilot and a list of solutions before launch.
Proposed first step
30- minute working performance: 10 minutes - problem and contour; 10 minutes — passport and proof; 10 minutes — decision on the composition of the working group and cases.
20 / OFFICIAL SOURCES
Current agenda and status of the addressee checked on materials of RSPP and Kremlin
[1] Draft resolution XXXV of the Congress of the RUIE, 23.03.2026
[2] Results XXXV Congress of the RSPP, 27.03.2026
[3] Investments and structural shifts, RSPP, 19.08.2026
[4] Investments, cooperation, localization, RSPP, 24.08.2026
[5] Results of "Innoprom-2026", RSPP, 09.07.2026
[6] Digital Forum: Barriers to Development AI, RSPP, 24.02.2026
[7] Labor productivity, RSPP, 27.06.2026
[8] RSPP Responsible Business Practices Report 2022–2026
[9] RSPP Committee on Ecology and Climate Policy, 18.04.2026
[10] National Climate Agenda Report, RSPP, 04.06.2026
Structure of RSPP: President of RSPP A.N. Shokhin
Working meeting of the President of the Russian Federation with the President of RSPP A.N. Shokhin, 26.05.2026
Document status
Author's concept. Any legal, financial, technical, metrological and industry conclusions arise only after independent verification of specific cases. Access to sources verified 29 August 2026
Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · EQUILIBRIUM — ECO-PPA — SPECZASHCHITA — ESG-IR — SFERA
Source materials
Originals and versions of the document
- Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.docxDOCX · main document
- Paket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.pptxPPTX · related version
Other editions in web format
Each version is disclosed separately; the sequence of the source document is saved.
Package to A.N. ShokhinPaket_Shokhinu_AN_RSPP.pptx · web text+
Project Cycle Counting System
RSPP proposal to jointly test the model on voluntary cases - without funding commitments and without premature status of the standard.
Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich
29 August 2026
01 / 15
One solution runs a no-commitment test
COUNTING SYSTEM
Authorize joint testing of the counting model on a limited set of voluntary cases.
RSPP forms a request and a verification site.
NON-FINANCING
days
The method gets the status only after the facts and expertise.
NOT STANDARD
12 months are discussed only after a positive result.
NOT A PILOT A YEAR
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
02 / 15
RSPP sets the request and rules for verification
Role of RSPP
Intersectoral cooperation
RSPP
not the project operator
Compare cases from different companies and industries.
Investment and ESG-agenda
Its value is to unite companies, fix the business issue and take the result according to previously agreed criteria.
Link the economics of the project with verifiable data.
Productivity and Scaling
Separate the reproducible mechanism from the single practice.
Request → Rules → Conclusion
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
03 / 15
The project cycle is broken between documents
CYCLE DEVELOPMENT
Today
REQUEST
TECHMODELE
AGREEMENT
EXECUTION
DATA
DECISION
ROLES
DEVELOPMENTS
PROOF
Liability limits are not fixed
The contract and the actual event differ
Data is collected post-facto
We need a common counting circuit that links the decision, commitment, event, and confirmation.
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
04 / 15
Six functions form a cross-cutting contour
DISTRIBUTION OF FUNCTIONS
One circuit - different owners of functions
forms a request
Designing
RSPP
EQUILIBRIUM
unites and implements
Strengthens the economy
SPECZASHCHITA
ECO-PPA
proves the result
Scaling
ESG-IR
SFERA
Inquiry → Project → Implementation → Economy → Proof → Scale
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
05 / 15
Eight registers collect the project in a single ledger
WORKING MODEL
Request and mandate
ECO-PPA
What is being checked and who is authorized
Economic obligations and conditions
Participants and roles
Events
Responsibility, Access and Conflict of Functions
What happened, when and to what extent
Project solutions
ESG-IR
versions, assumptions and points of choice
chain of evidence and verification
Data
Decisions
source, owner, quality and period
GO, Conditions, Stop or Scaling
Registers are subject to verification, not a ready-made regulatory form.
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
06 / 15
ECO-PPA
ECONOMY
ECO-PPA enshrines economic logic in event passport
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANISM
WHAT IS AGREED
object · base · indicator · commitment
A working passport that links a condition, a measurable event, and an economic consequence.
WHAT HAPPENED
Event · Period · Deviation · Owner
WHAT IS CONFIRMED
It does not promise profitability. It does not replace the contract. Checks the model connectivity.
Source · Method · Verification · Conclusion
The passport becomes a common reference point for business, project and evidentiary function.
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
07 / 15
ESG-IR concludes reproducible, not declarative
EVALUATION CHARGE
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANISM · each total passes one chain of origin of data
REQUIREMENT
SOURCE
EVENT
What needs to be proved
Where the data came from
what happened and when
METHOD
VERIFICATION
CONCLUSION
How the indicator is calculated
Who and what checked
What can be asserted
If the link is not confirmed, the conclusion is marked as conditional or unproven.
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
08 / 15
741
MAP VERIFICATION
741 — completeness card, not standard
3 × 13 × 19
facility · enterprise · inter-industry circuit
3 scales
Test combination
Project and operational cycle sequence
13 Phases
The coating helps to see omissions and repetitions - it does not prove the applicability of each combination.
Economics, Resources, Commitments and Evidence
19 balances
On the 90-th day the map is revised on the actual cases.
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
09 / 15
Separation of Functions Protects Self-Esteem Verification
ROLES AND BORDERS
Each participant is responsible for his own site; the result is formed only by comparing independent contours.
| CONTOUR | FUNCTION | BORDER |
|---|---|---|
| RSPP | request and rules | Not an operator and not a verifier |
| EQUILIBRIUM | Architecture Models | does not confirm its own result |
| SPECZASHCHITA | Integration and execution | Not the only source of data |
| ECO-PPA | experimental economic passport | No guarantee of effect or funding |
| ESG-IR | Experimental chain of evidence | output only within the data |
| SFERA | Propagation | After the Go decision. |
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
10 / 15
Up to three voluntary cases are enough for the first check
CASE SELECTION
Minimum Variability
Criteria for admission
Case
- Volunteering. Written consent of the owner of the case.
- Availability of data. The source and the responsible are identified.
- Eventuality. There is a measurable change within 90 days.
- Legally verifiable. There is no prohibition on contour analysis.
- Comparability. There is a common minimum of fields between cases.
Managed Volume
Company
Not a single practice
Industry
tolerability check
Commercial data remains with the owners; access mode is agreed separately.
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
11 / 15
90 days divided into three test stages
SCHEDULE OF APROBATION
Each stage ends with an artifact and a decision to continue.
DAYS 1–30
DAYS 31–60
DAYS 61–90
Assembly
PROGON
CONCLUSION
Mandate · cases · data · basic passports
Events · Deviations · Proof Chain
reconciliation · criteria · solution GO/NO-GO
Transition between stages - only in the presence of the data owner and the permitted mode of operation.
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
12 / 15
Day 90: Six verifiable results
RESULTS OF THE APROBATION
Proven role scheme
Passport Cases
Who creates, transmits and confirms data
single minimum ECO-PPA for selected projects
Completed registers
Evidence Chains
consequences of decisions, events and deviations
ESG-IR marked with spaces
Legal Data Limitations
Outcome protocol
List of permits, risks and improvements
GO, conditional GO or NO-GO
The value of approbation is not a beautiful report, but the right to accept a negative conclusion on a verifiable basis.
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
13 / 15
Outcome: data, law, reproducibility
CRITERIUM RESULT
The same criteria apply to each case and to the model as a whole.
| CRITERIA | GO | CONDITIONAL GO | NO-GO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data traceability | Source and owner confirmed | There are closed gaps. | Key source not available |
| Legal capacity | mode applicable | Need to refine conditions | Model not applicable |
| Reproducibility | Repeat the result | Repeat with reservations | the conclusion depends on the manual interpretation |
| Practical load | proportional to the task | need to simplify the contour | Load Blocks Application |
| Readiness of participants | Owners are appointed | Need for additional commitments | No responsible parties |
A 12-month pilot is only possible after GO or an agreed conditional GO.
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
14 / 15
Resolution fixes limited next step
DECISION
"To support the joint 90-day testing of the project cycle counting system on voluntary cases of RSPP member companies. To instruct the working group to determine the composition of cases, the mode of working with data and the criteria for the final decision. The question of 12-month pilot to consider after the confirmation of the data, the legal and practical viability of the model.
Schedule a working meeting and agree on the owner of 90-day approbation
NEXT STEP
Sokolov Sergey Leonidovich · severa70@mail.ru
PACKAGE K A.N. Shokhin
15 / 15
Sources indicated in the presentation 7
- https://rspp.ru/about/structure/
- https://rspp.ru/events/news/na-sezde-rspp-s-uchastiem-prezidenta-rf-vladimira-putina-obsudili-perspektivy-vozvrashcheniya-ekonomiki-k-ustoychivomu-rostu-69c6a06a2db37/
- https://rspp.ru/events/news/investitsii-i-strukturnye-sdvigi-chto-biznes-zhdet-ot-donastroyki-gospodderzhki-itogi-zasedaniya-soveta-po-strategicheskomu-razvitiyu-6a85c4928270a/
- https://rspp.ru/events/news/investitsii-kooperatsiya-lokalizatsiya-koorsovet-rspp-v-tsfo-oboznachil-prioritety-promyshlennoy-politiki-6a8c04594bc28/
- https://rspp.ru/events/news/proizvoditelnost-truda-kak-osnova-razvitiya-o-chem-govorili-na-federalnom-sovete-rspp-6a3f9781490a4/
- https://rspp.ru/download/65ddb8db6f5289602e8d1aa18c76a1d934d4ce7093107c7f/
- [/Sources]
